alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 1 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 2 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 3 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 4 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 5 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 6 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 7 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 8 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 9 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 10 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 11 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 12 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 13 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 14 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 15 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 16 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 17 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 18 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 19 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 20 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 21 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 22 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 23 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 24 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 25 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 26 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 27 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 28 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 29 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 30 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 31 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 32 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 33 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 34 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 35 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 36 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 37 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 38 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 39 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 40 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 41 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 42 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 43 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-5 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 44 of 44
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The
Board of Directors
interWAVE Communications International, Ltd.

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (File Nos. 333-38690, 333-59310, 333-59308, 333-64854,
333-87142 and 333-96613) on Form S-8 of interWAVE Communications International, Ltd. of our report dated September 25, 2003, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of interWAVE Communications International, Ltd. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders' equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2003, and the related financial statement schedule, which
report appears in this annual report on Form 10-K of interWAVE Communications International, Ltd. for the year ended June 30, 2003.

Our
report dated September 25, 2003 contains an explanatory paragraph describing the Company's change in accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets.

| |  |            
| |  | -----------
| |  | /s/KPMG LLP

Mountain
View, California September 25, 2003

---

QuickLinks
#### SNOW v. POWER CO.

No. 23 PC.

No. 113 (Spring Term).

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 350.

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 6 March 1979.
#### LUMBER CO. v. SURETY CO.

No. 83 PC.

Case below: 12 N.C. App. 641.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 January 1972.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-51018 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. MANUEL DE JESUS HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, a lso known as Manuel Jesus Hernandez-Hernandez, also known as Rodolfo Loera, a l s o k n own as Manuel de Jesus Hernandez-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:10-CR-1981-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * M a n uel De Jesus Hernandez-Hernandez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States. He contends that the sentence is greater than necessary to achieve the sentencing goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), overstates the seriousness of his offense, results in U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D August 15, 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-51018 Document: 00511571689 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/15/2011No. 10-51018

unjust double counting , a n d f ails to take into account his personal characteristics, as well as his benign motive for reentry. Under the ordinary standard of review, we afford a s entence within a pro p e rly c alcul at e d gui d e lin e s r an ge a p r esumption of reasonableness. However, because Hernandez-Hernandez failed to object to the reasonableness of the sentence in the district court, review is limited to plain error. See United States

v. Peltier , 505 F.3d 389, 391-92 (5th Cir. 2007). To succeed under this standard, H e r n a n d ez-Hernandez must show an error that is clear or obvious and th a t affects his substantial rights. See Puckett v. United States , 129 S. Ct. 1423, 1429 (2009)

. Hernandez-Hernandez has not shown that the district court plainly erred in imposing his 60-month sentence. Thi s c o urt has previously rejected the argument that a sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 is unreasonable because it resulted from unjust double counting. United States v. Duarte , 569 F.3d 528, 529-31 (5th Cir. 2009). Moreover, the record demonstrates that the district court considered Hernandez-Hernandez’s arguments for a lesser sentence, including his personal history, characteristics, and motive. After weighing those factors, the d i s trict court concluded that the Guidelines provided the appropriate sentencing range. The district court’s decision to sentence within the Guidelines is entitled to deference. See United States v. Campos-Maldonado , 531 F.3d 337, 339 (5th C ir. 2008). Hernandez-Hernandez’s disagreement with the sentence does not suffice even to rebut the presumption of reasonableness that attaches to a sentence within the a dvi sory guidelines range. Thus, he has shown no reversible plain error. AFFIRMED. Case: 10-51018 Document: 00511571689 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/15/2011
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

BRUCE WAYNE NELOMES, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-469

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed December 6, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Polk County; Keith P. Spoto, Judge.

Bruce Wayne Nelomes, pro se. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and BADALAMENTI JJ., Concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 192 (Thursday, October 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 56776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4930]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Board of Scientific Counselor, NHLBI.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, including consideration of personnel 
qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual 
investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NHLBI.
    Date: October 29, 2007.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsic Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Robert S Balaban, PhD, Scientific Director, 
Division of Intramural Research, National Institutes of Health, 
NHLBI, Building 10, CRC, 4th Floor, Room 1581, 10 Center Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 301/496-2116.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http:///www.nhlbi.nih.gov/meetings/index.htm, where an agenda 
and any additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 27, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-4930 Filed 10-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
Subject: Letter of Support for the National Firefighter Registry for Cancer

On behalf of the Women’s Fire Alliance the NFRC has our wholehearted support for the establishment

and implementation of the National Firefighter Registry for Cancer. As an organization dedicated to the

empowerment and well-being of women in the firefighting profession, we recognize the critical

importance of addressing the unique challenges and health concerns faced by firefighters, particularly in

relation to cancer.

Firefighters are exposed to a myriad of hazardous substances and carcinogens in the line of duty, putting

them at an increased risk of developing various forms of cancer. The establishment of a comprehensive

and centralized registry is a crucial step towards understanding the prevalence, patterns, and potential

causes of cancer within the firefighting community. This registry will not only facilitate in-depth research

but will also contribute to the development of preventive measures, early detection strategies, and

improved treatment options.

We commend the initiative to create a dedicated registry that includes gender-specific data, recognizing

the distinct challengesfaced by women in the firefighting profession. Asthe number of women in the field

continues to grow, it is essential to tailor resources and support to address their unique needs and ensure

their health and safety. The Women’s Fire Alliance believes that the National Firefighter Registry for

Cancer will not only serve as a valuable tool for researchers and healthcare professionals but will also raise

awareness about the significant health risks associated with firefighting. By actively supporting and

participating in the registry, we hope to contribute to a safer and healthier environment for firefighters

across the nation.

We extend our gratitude to the National Firefighter Registry for Cancer for taking this crucialstep towards

safeguarding the well-being of our firefighting community. The Women’s Fire Alliance pledges its full

support and commitment to collaborating in any way possible to ensure the success of this vital initiative.

Thank you for your dedication to the health and safety of firefighters. We look forward to witnessing the

positive impact that the National Firefighter Registry for Cancer will undoubtedly have on the well-being

of those who risk their lives to protect our communities.

Sincerely,

Andrea Binley Tamara Chick Melissa Hillis Jaime Ellazar

Chairperson Vice-Chair Treasurer Secretary

WomensFireAlliance.com Women’s Fire Alliance WomensFireAlliance@gmail.com

 19425 Soledad Canyon Road #171

 Canton Country, CA 91351
#### PRESSLEY v. CAN COMPANY

No. 38 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 467.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 April 1979.
#### HUBBARD v. CASUALTY CO.

No. 28 PC.

Case below: 24 N.C. App. 493.

Petitiqn for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of’ Appeals denied 2 April 1975.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1984 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1984

 To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 
 to provide fisheries disaster relief for commercial fishery failures 
        that are due to certain duties, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 26, 2019

   Mr. Wyden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 
 to provide fisheries disaster relief for commercial fishery failures 
        that are due to certain duties, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FISHERIES DISASTER RELIEF FOR COMMERCIAL FISHERY FAILURES 
              DUE TO CERTAIN DUTIES.

    Section 312(a)(1)(B) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation 
and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1861a(a)(1)(B)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(i)'' before ``regulatory 
        restrictions''; and
            (2) by inserting ``or (ii) increases in duties on any 
        United States seafood products (within the meaning of the term 
        `fish' under section 3), or fish products, as retaliation for 
        increases in duties imposed by the United States pursuant to 
        section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (19 U.S.C. 1862) 
        or section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2411), 
        including increases in duties on seafood products pursuant to 
        such section 301'' after ``environment''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:07-cv-03555-BSJ-THK Document 3 Filed 08/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA
, Respondent
,

v.

J ON ANTHONY SCHWEDER
, Petitioner

.
No. 1 CA

- CR 2 2

- 0 26 7 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Navajo County

No. S0900CR20090633 The Honorable Melinda K. Hardy
, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL
Navajo County Attorney’s Office
, Holbrook By Bradley W. Carlyon Counsel for Respondent

J on Anthony Schweder, Florence Petitioner FILED 1-10-2023ST ATE v. SCHWEDER Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Maria Elena Cruz , Judge Angela K. Paton
, and Judge Peter B. Swann 1 delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM :

¶1 Petitioner J on Anthony Schweder seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief

. This is petitioner’s fifth successive petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 A riz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete
, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishi ng abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.

1 Judge Peter B. Swann was a sitting member of this court when the matter was assigned to this panel of the court. He retired effective November 28, 2022. In accordance with the authority granted by Article 6, Section 3, of the Arizona Constitution and pur suant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12

- 145, the Chief Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court has designated Judge Swann as a judge pro tempore in the Court of Appeals for the purpose of participating in the resolution of cases assigned to th is panel during his term in office and the period during which his vacancy remains open and for the duration of Administrative Order 2022

- 162.ST ATE v. SCHWEDER Decision of the Court

3 ¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
#### GLADSON v. PIEDMONT STORES

No. 371P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 579.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 25 August 1982.
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 1 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 2 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 3 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 4 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 5 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 6 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 7 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 8 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 9 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 10 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 11 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 12 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 13 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 14 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 15 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 16 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 17 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 18 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 19 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 20 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 21 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 22 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 23 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 24 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 25 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 26 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 27 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 28 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 29 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 30 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 31 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 32 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 33 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 34 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 35 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 36 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 37 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 38 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 39 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 40 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 41 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 42 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 1-3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 43 of 43
#### STATE v. HOSKINS

No. 290 PC.

Case below: 42 N.C. App. 108.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 September 1979.
Case 1:07-cv-03513-LAP     Document 3      Filed 05/03/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03513-LAP     Document 3      Filed 05/03/2007     Page 2 of 2