alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 23 (Monday, February 5, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 5149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-512]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 23 / Monday, February 5, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 5149]]

                Memorandum of January 25, 2007

                
Assignment of Functions Under the Darfur Peace 
                and Accountability Act of 2006

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and laws of the United States, including 
                section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby 
                assign to you the functions of the President under 
                sections 6(a), 6(b), and 6(f) of the Darfur Peace and 
                Accountability Act of 2006 (Public Law 109-344). In 
                performing such functions, you shall consult with other 
                heads of departments and agencies, as appropriate.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, January 25, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-512
Filed 2-2-07; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
#### WYATT v. HAYWOOD

Nos. 71 and 32 PC.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 267.

285 N.C. 669, cert. allowed.

Motion of defendants to withdraw appeal allowed 26 September 1974.
1

The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-2026

___________

Kevin L. Chambers, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Joan M. Gilmer, Clerk, St. Louis *

County Circuit Court; Robert * [UNPUBLISHED]

McCulloch, St. Louis County *

Prosecutor, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: April 5, 2007

Filed: April 9, 2007

___________

Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Chambers appeals the district court’s1

 preservice dismissal of his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against a county prosecutor and a circuit court clerk. He

alleged that, as permitted under state law, he submitted to the circuit court a document

detailing criminal conduct by St. Louis County police officers, see Mo. Rev. Stat.
-2-

§ 545.250 (private citizen with knowledge of commission of crime may file sworn

affidavit “with the clerk of the court having jurisdiction of the offense, for the use of

the prosecuting attorney, or deposit it with the prosecuting attorney”); that the clerk

(acting in concert with the prosecutor) refused to “process” the document; and that this

refusal violated his right of access to the courts. We conclude Chambers did not state

a section 1983 claim, because the alleged actions did not violate his constitutional

rights. See West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988) (to state § 1983 claim, plaintiff

must allege violation of right secured by Constitution or federal law). Specifically

with regard to his access-to-courts claim, defendants’ alleged actions did not prevent

Chambers from asserting his rights in a lawsuit against the police officers who

allegedly mistreated him, and Chambers did not allege the requisite actual injury from

defendants’ actions to state such a claim in any event. See Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S.

343, 351-354 (1996) (plaintiff must allege actual injury in access-to-courts claim).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000057497
<NAME> THE LAMSON & SESSSIONS CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. CURRENCY
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-05-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,301
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,023
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     51,843
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               110,809
<PP&E>                                         115,778
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 181,743
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,358
<BONDS>                                         48,842
<COMMON>                                         1,331
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,916
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   181,743
<SALES>                                         68,844
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,844
<CGS>                                           53,951
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,457
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (700)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,157
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,157
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03542-LAK Document 13 Filed 08/22/2007 Page 1 of 1
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **2 -**  **8021**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. DONALD LAMONT POSTELL , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Frank D. Whitney , District Judge. ( 3: 88

- cr - 00 136

- FDW

- 1 ; 3:12

- cv - 00322

- FDW )

Submitted : March 28, 2013 Decided: April 3, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Donald Lamont Postell , Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray , Assistant United States Attorney , Asheville, North Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Donald Lamont Postell seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1 ) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Postell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument be cause the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Construction

Toolbox Talk

Equipment Safety:

Forklifts

OSHA estimates that hundreds of thousands of injuries 

and fatalities involving forklifts occur in the United States 

each year. 

Ricky and Bill’s Story 

Ricky was using a forklift to move a load of drywall 

panels. Bill, another worker, noticed materials on the 

ground that he thought were blocking the forklift’s 

path. He stepped out in front of the forklift, forcing 

Ricky to stop suddenly. When the forklift stopped, 

the drywall panels fell off and struck Bill, breaking 

his leg. 

# What caused this incident? 

# How could this have been prevented?

# Have you ever been injured around a forklift, 

or do you know someone who has? If so, what 

happened? 

Remember This

• Do not operate a forklift unless you have been trained 

and certified.

• Inspect the forklift every day before use. If damage or 

problems occur with the forklift during your shift, tell 

your supervisor.

• Use seat belts if they are available.

• Exit from a rear-entry, stand-up forklift by stepping 

backward, in case of a lateral tip-over.

• Use extreme caution on grades and ramps. On 

grades, tilt the load back and raise it only as far as 

needed to clear the road surface.

• Do not raise or lower the forks while the lift is moving.

• Do not drive up to anyone standing in front of a bench 

or other fixed object. Travel backward with the load if 

you cannot see in front of you. Also, look toward the 

travel path and keep a clear view of it.

• Sound the horn as you approach and while turning 

corners where you cannot see.

• Band or secure loads if they could fall. 

How can we stay safe today?

What will we do at the worksite to prevent forklift injuries?

OSHA Standard: 1910.178 (applies to construction)
Construction

Toolbox Talk

Equipment Safety:

Forklifts

; Do not operate a forklift unless you have been trained and certified.

; Use extreme caution on grades and ramps.

; Do not raise or lower the forks while the forklift is moving.

GET 

INFORMATION 

CDC/NIOSH INFO: 1-800-CDC-INFO (1-800-232-4636) | TTY: 1-800-232-6348 | cdc.gov/info | cdc.gov/niosh

CPWR: Contact 301-578-8500 | cpwr-r2p@cpwr.com | www.cpwr.com/toolbox-talks

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2022-147 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB2022147 | August 2022
Exhibit 32.2



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of IVAX Diagnostics, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Deutsch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 31, 2005



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Mark S. Deutsch    
|Mark S. Deutsch,       
|Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

BRICE BUILDING COMPANY, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv31/RS-MD

SUANN LEE and GLENDA E. LEE,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Joint Motion To Vacate Order (Doc. 24). 

IT IS ORDERED that the Judgment which was entered by the Order 

(Doc. 23) dated October 22, 2010, is vacated.

ORDERED on November 16, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

KEITH SILFIES,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 139 MM 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of November, 2016, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Extraordinary, King’s Bench, or 

Habeas Corpus Relief is DENIED.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SHERRIE RUSSELL-BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00257-MP -GRJ

ROBERT H JERRY, II, LEVIN COLLEGE OF LAW, THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, THE

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 181, Consent Motion to Appear Telephonically

for Status Conference. Plaintiff Russell-Brown requests that counsel appear telephonically at the

status conference scheduled for Wednesday, March 2, 2011. The Court has determined that an

in-court hearing is required. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Motion to Appear Telephonically for Status Conference, Doc. 181, is

DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of February, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Exhibit 32.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF TEHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  Thomas  Cooke,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report of Saratoga  Resources,  Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December
31, 2001 fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and that  information  contained  in such Form
10-KSB  fairly  presents in all material  respects the  financial  condition and
results of operations of Saratoga Resources, Inc.


                                           By:   /S/ Thomas Cooke
                                                 ____________________________
                                           Name: Thomas Cooke
                                           Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                           Dated: July 8, 2005
Case 1:07-cv-03542-LAK Document 10 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03542-LAK Document 10 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03542-LAK Document 10 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03542-LAK Document 10 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03542-LAK Document 10 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 5 of 5
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 232 (Monday, December 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 72424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23625]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-580-816]


Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Korea: 
Extension of Time Limits for the Final Results of Antidumping 
Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victoria Cho at (202) 482-5075, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On September 22, 2004, the Department published a notice of 
initiation of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order 
on corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat products from Korea, covering 
the period August 1, 2003, to July 31, 2004, (the ``eleventh review'') 
(69 FR 56745). On April 7, 2005, the Department fully extended the 
preliminary results of the eleventh administrative review by 120 days 
(70 FR 17648). On September 7, 2005, the Department published the 
preliminary results of the eleventh administrative review (70 FR 
53153). The final results of this review are currently due no later 
than January 5, 2006.

Extension of Time Limits

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act), requires the Department to issue (1) the preliminary results of a 
review within 245 days after the last day of the month in which occurs 
the anniversary of the date of publication of an order or finding for 
which a review is requested, and (2) the final results within 120 days 
after the date on which the preliminary results are published. However, 
if it is not practicable to complete the review within that time 
period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend 
the time limit for the preliminary results to a maximum of 365 days and 
to extend the time limit for the final result to a maximum of 180 days. 
See also 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).
    We determine that it is not practicable to complete the final 
results of this review within the original time limit of complex model-
match issues that cuts across all of the antidumping duty orders on the 
subject merchandise. Therefore, the Department is extending the 
deadline for the final results of the above referenced review by 32 
days until February 6, 2006.This extension is in accordance with 
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).

    Dated: November 28, 2005.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 05-23625 Filed 12-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# Date and Time:

Friday, October 12, 2007; 9:30 a.m. 

# Place:

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Rm. 540, Washington, DC 20425. 

## Meeting Agenda 

I. Approval of Agenda. 

II. Approval of Minutes of September 21, Meeting. 

III. Announcements. 

IV. Staff Director's Report. 

V. Management and Operations. 
    - Strategic Plan.
    - Establishment of Briefing and Meeting Schedule for 2008.
    - Celebration of Commission's 50th Anniversary.
    - Information Quality Guidelines.
    - Involvement of Commissioners in Staff Activities.

VI. Program Planning. 
    - Consideration of Proposed Debate on Race and Intelligence.

VII. State Advisory Committee Issues. 
    - South Carolina SAC.
    - Involvement of Commissioners on State Advisory Committees.

VIII. Future Agenda Items. 

IX. Adjourn. 

# Contact Person for Further Information:

Manuel Alba, Press and Communications, (202) 376-8582. 

Dated: October 2, 2007. 

David Blackwood, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 07-4949 Filed 10-2-07; 12:32 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
#### FOODS, INC. v. SUPER MARKETS

No. 18 PC.

Case below: 24 N.C. App. 447.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 2 April 1975.
Case 7:07-cv-03537-CLB Document 8-2 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CHRISTOPHER MILLER

,

Petitioner

,

v. Case No. 5D 1 8

- 213 2

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent

. ________________________________/

Opinion filed July 20, 2018

Petition for Belated Appeal A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Robert Wesley, Public Defender, Orlando,
and Peter C . Schmer, Assistant Public Defender, Orlando, for P etitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed

with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the May 30, 2018

judgment and sentence s rendered in C ase N o. 2016

- CF

- 7640

- A

- O

, in the Circuit Court

in and for Orange County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)( 6 )(D).

PETITION GRANTED

.

PALMER, LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE

, JJ., concur.