alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION PREMIER 

LEAGUE LIMITED, et al.. 

Plaintiffs, 

YOUTUBE, INC., et al.. 

Defendants 

Case No. 1 :07-cv-3582 (LLS) (FM) 

ORDER FOR ADMISSION OF 

KEVIN MICHAEL DOHERTY 

PRO HAC VICE 

ON WRITTEN MOTION 

Up011 the motion of Louis M. Solomon, attorney for Lead Plaintiffs The Football 

Association Premier League Limited and Bourne Co.. Named Plaintiffs Murbo Music 

Publishing, Inc.. Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company, Inc., Robert Tur d/b/a Los Angeles 

News Service. X-Ray Dog Music, Inc., Federation Fraqaise de Tennis, and The Scottish 

Premier League Limited. and for the Prospective Class (collectively, "Plaint~ffs") and said 

sponsor attorney's affidavit in support; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 

Applicant's Name: Kevin Michael Doherty 

Firm Name: Burr & Forman LLP 

Address: 700 Two American Center 

3 1 02 West End Avenue 

CitylStateiZip: Nashville, Tennessee 37203 

TelephoneIFax: (615) 724-321 1 / (615) 724-33 11 

Email Address: kdohertyoburr.con~ 

is admitted to practice pro huc vice as counsel for Cal IV Entertainment. LLC in the abovecaptioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All 

attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the 

Rules governing discipline of attorneys. This action has been assigned to the Electronic Case 

Filing (ECF) system and as such, counsel shall immediately register for an ECF password 

The Football Association Premier League Limited et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al Doc. 100

Dockets.Justia.com
lrNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRlCT OF NEW YORK 

THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION PREMIER 

LEAGUE LIMITED. et al., 

Plaintiffs. 

YOUTUBE, INC., et al., 

Defendants. 

ECF Case 

Case No. 1:07-cv-3582 (LLS) (FM) 

ORDER FOR ADMISSION OF 

GERALD E. MARTIN 

PRO HAC VICE 

ON WRITTEN MOTION 

Upon the motion of Louis M. Solomon. attorney for Lead Plaintiffs The Football 

Association Premier League Limited and Bourne Co.. Named Plaintiffs Murbo Music 

Publishing, Inc., Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company, Inc.. Robert Tur d/b/a Los Angeles 

News Service, X-Ray Dog Music, Inc.. Federation Fran~aise de Tennis, and The Scottish 

Premier League Limited, and for the I'rospective Class (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and said 

sponsor attorney's affidavit in support; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 

Applicant's Nanle: Gerald E. Martin 

Fir111 Name: Barrett Johnston & Parsley 

Address: 3 17 Second Avenue North 

CitylStateIZip: Nashville, Tennessee 37201 

TelephoneIFax: (6 15) 244-2202/(615) 25 1-3798 

Email Address: itiial-tin8;barrettiohnston.com 

is admitted to practice pro huc vrcr as counsel for Cal IV Entertainment LLC in the abovecaptioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All 

attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the 

Rules governing discipline of attorneys. This action has been assigned to the Electronic Case 

Filing (ECF) system and as such, counsel shall immediately register for an ECF passuord.
Exhibit 4.4 Description of Company’s Securities


 

Exhibit 4.4

 

Description of Company’s Securities

 

As of March 24, 2020, Mentor Capital, Inc. has one class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: our Common Stock. 

 

The following description of our Common Stock is a summary and does not include all terms and conditions applicable to such shares. The description is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) and our Bylaws, each of which are incorporated by reference as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2019, to which this description is attached, and the Delaware General Corporation Law. We encourage you to read the Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws, and the applicable provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law for additional information. 

 

Authorized Capital Shares

 

Our authorized capital shares consist of 75,000,000 shares of Common Stock, each with a par value of $0.0001, and 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, each with a par value of $0.0001, of which 200,000 shares of Preferred Stock have been designated as Series Q Preferred Stock. 

 

Voting Rights

 

The holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters voted on by shareholders, including the election of directors. The Company’s Board of Directors is not classified and each member is elected annually. The Common Stock does not have cumulative voting rights. Holders of Common Stock may act by unanimous consent. 

 

Dividend Rights

 

Subject to the rights of holders of outstanding shares of Preferred Stock, including shares of Series Q Preferred Stock, the holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive dividends when and if declared by the Company’s Board of Directors in its discretion out of funds legally available for payment of dividends. 

 

Liquidation Rights

 

Subject to any preferential rights of outstanding shares of Preferred Stock, including shares of Series Q Preferred Stock, holders of Common Stock will share ratably in all assets legally available for distribution to our stockholders in the event of dissolution or liquidation. 

 

Other Rights and Preferences

 

All of the issued shares of Common Stock of the Company are fully paid and non-assessable. Our Common Stock has no sinking fund provision and no preemptive, conversion, or exchange rights. Except as allowed by Delaware General Corporation Law, the shares of Common Stock are not subject to any redemption provisions.  

 

Trading

 

The Company’s shares of Common Stock are traded on the Over-the-Counter OTCQX Best Market (“OTCQX”) under the trading symbol “MNTR”.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JANUARY 31, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,562
<SECURITIES>                                    15,750
<RECEIVABLES>                                  709,725
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    593,149
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,802,609
<PP&E>                                       1,576,148
<DEPRECIATION>                               (940,192)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,571,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,652,572
<BONDS>                                        489,988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,053
<COMMON>                                        46,159
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,075,378
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,571,233
<SALES>                                      2,102,850
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,102,850
<CGS>                                        1,541,224
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,541,224
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,559
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,299
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                140,109
<INCOME-TAX>                                    56,044
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             84,065
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    84,065
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.77
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

-% 

In re Fosamax Froducts Liability : 

Lit lgdt ion 

- - - - - - - - . .. - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X 

This Gocutnent Re2ates to: 

All Actions. ----.----------------------------- -X 

JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District 3udge: 

After considering the letters subinltted 

the !:our-t w:ll r,ot enter M~rck's propc~ed order regarding rases 

filed by BeatFe and Osbdrrt, LLP that involve less t!~an three 

zcntinuous years of Fosamax use. Whether fir not Fcsa~nax call cause 

ONJ in anyone before three years of use remains an open quest-ion 

that should be resolved uniformly on the basla of the scientific 

evidence generated a£ ter a f gll opporturli tls for dir;covery. 

Thc parties are directed tc7 agree upsn and submit to the 

Court by October 7, 20ila a case managemuilt order Froposlng: (1) a 

sckdule to con~plete all generic expert discovery In this MDL; and 

(2) a schedule for summary judqn-tent mot-ions. In the event that the 

parties cannot reach agreement, by the same date each shall submit 

~ts own PI-oposal dlcng with a letter brief In support of it, and 

appear for a conference in ~ourtrooni 20C on Octobei- 16, 2005 at 

1G:30 am. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: New York, New York 

September 9, 2008 

I 

1 

JOHN F. KEENAN 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 37 Filed 09/09/2008 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - RIN 0648-XD03

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of Availability of Record of Decision.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, NMFS announces availability of the Record of Decision (ROD) for amending the Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan (ALWTRP). NMFS approves Alternative 6 Final Preferred, which includes broad-based, coast-wide gear modifications and seasonal restrictions.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Copies of the ROD and Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)/Regulatory Impact Review for amending the ALWTRP can be obtained from the ALWTRP website listed under the Electronic Access portion of this document or by contacting staff listed under the                         **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                         section of this document. For additional                         **ADDRESSES**                         and Web sites for document availability see                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         section.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Diane Borggaard, NMFS, Northeast Region, 978-281-9300 Ext. 6503,                         *diane.borggaard@noaa.gov*; Kristy Long, NMFS, Office of Protected Resources, 301-713-2322,                         *kristy.long@noaa.gov*; or Barb Zoodsma, NMFS, Southeast Region, 904-321-2806,                         *barb.zoodsma@noaa.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic Access

                    The ROD and the FEIS are available electronically from the following Web site:                     *http://www.nero.noaa.gov/​whaletrp/​*.                

Dated: September 27, 2007.

Samuel D. Rauch III,

Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 07-4913 Filed 10-1-07; 11:33 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 14-5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 14-5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 14-5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 14-5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 14-5 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cr-00382-JFK Document 29 Filed 03/06/2008 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS     Document 3      Filed 05/22/2007     Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Ernest C. Hunt, Appellant, *v.*William A. Prendergast, as Comptroller of the City of New York, Respondent.

*People ex rel. Hunt*v. *Prendergast,*173 App. Div. 984, affirmed.

(Argued May 28, 1918;

decided June 11, 1918.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered July 26, 1916, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel defendant to audit and certify a payroll containing the name of relator as secretary of Hunter College for the months of January to June, 1915. The question involved is whether, for the year 1915, he is entitled to be paid a salary at the rate of $3,000 a year, which was the amount fixed by the board of trustees of. the. College, on the 16th day of September, 1914, or at the rate of $2,400 a year, which was the rate fixed by the board of estimate and apportionment and the board of aldermen, pursuant to section 56 of the charter.

*John M. O’ Neill*for appellant.

*William P.*Burr, *Corporation Counsel (Terence Farley*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Case 7:07-cv-03544-KMK-LMS Document 9 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 7:07-cv-03544-KMK-LMS Document 9 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 7:07-cv-03544-KMK-LMS Document 9 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 3 of 3
# C_2011146EN.01001101.xml

| 17.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/11

---

Commission Communication concerning the implementation of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 552/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network (1)

1

(Text with EEA relevance)

(Publication of titles and references of Community specifications under the Regulation)

2011/C 146/05

| Organisation | Reference | Edition number | Title of the Community specifications | Edition date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Eurocontrol (2) | Spec-0106 | 4.2 | Eurocontrol Specification for On-Line Data Interchange (OLDI) (3) | 16.12.2010 |

Organisation

Reference

Edition number

Title of the Community specifications

Edition date

Eurocontrol (2)

2

Spec-0106

4.2

Eurocontrol Specification for On-Line Data Interchange (OLDI) (3)

3

16.12.2010

---

(1)  OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 26.

1

(2)  European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation: rue de la Fusée 96, 1130 Brussels, BELGIUM, Tel. +32 27299011, Fax +32 27295190.

2

(3)  http://www.eurocontrol.int/ses/public/standard_page/oldi_spec.html

3

---
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DIMITRA COGDELL, 

Appellant, 

v.

Case No. 5D23-1319

LT Case No. 2013-CF-11169-A 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed May 16, 2023

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Duval County, 

Tatiana Salvador, Judge.

Dimitra Cogdell, Florida City, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EISNAUGLE, KILBANE and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
#### MARGARET E. SKIPPER v. HAMORE CORP., d/b/a HOWARD JOHNSON'S MOTOR LODGE.

(Filed 4 November, 1964.)

Negligence § 37f—

Evidence *held*insufficient to show negligence on the part of the proprietor causing fall of patron when she failed to observe the difference of five inches in elevation between the floor and door of a motel room and the walk.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of nonsuit entered by *McConnell, J.,*at the May 25, 1964 Session, Fohsyth Superior Court.

Plaintiff alleged that as an invitee she entered the defendant’s motel room No. 105 as the guest of the occupants, Mr. and Mrs. Grice. The entrance to the room was from the outside and elevated about five inches above the concrete walk constructed along the building and as a part of it. After remaining in the room for about 30 minutes, she attempted to leave but failed to observe the difference in elevation between the door and the walk, lost her balance, fell, and was injured. She testified the lights were somewhat dim and there was little or no contrast in the colors of the floor of the room and the walk. However, the evidence disclosed there was an outside light on the wall between rooms 105 and 104. Also, there were lights on the top of the building illuminating the parking area which bordered the walkway. She introduced evidence of rather serious injuries necessitating the payment of hospital bills and causing loss of time from work.

The defendant answered, denied negligence, and affirmatively alleged the building and entrance to the rooms were constructed according to standard building plans and practices, and that ample light on the outside of room No. 105 disclosed the difference in elevation between the walk and the room; that plaintiff’s fall was a result of her own failure to look where she was placing her feet, although 30 minutes be*742fore her fall she had entered the room by the same door. Hence she was, or should have been, familiar with the difference in the elevations.

From the judgment dismissing the action, plaintiff appealed.

*Harold B. Wilson, Alvin A. Thomas for plaintiff appellant.*

*Deal, Hutchins and Minor, by John M. Minor, Thomas W. Moore, Jr., for defendant appellee.*

PER Cueiam.

If we concede the complaint states a cause of action, the evidence fails to show the plaintiff's fall and injury in stepping down from the level of the room to the level of the walk resulted from defendant’s negligence. The plaintiff had stepped from the walk to the door only 30 minutes before her fall. Neither the light nor the color of the walk had changed. Hence she was charged with notice of the difference in the elevations. Evidence of actionable negligence is lacking. The judgment of nonsuit is

Affirmed.
# C_2011024EN.01000701.xml

| 26.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/7

---

Information from Latvia concerning the implementation of Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

2011/C 24/06

The Republic of Latvia has informed the Commission according to Annex II, Section II.2.8 to Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on the inland transport of dangerous goods that:

| — | In accordance to the requirements set out in Annex II, Section II.2.8 to Directive 2008/68/EC Latvia uses Annex II to SMGS regarding the transport of dangerous goods by rail from and to contracting parties of the OSJD which are not Member States of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

—

In accordance to the requirements set out in Annex II, Section II.2.8 to Directive 2008/68/EC Latvia uses Annex II to SMGS regarding the transport of dangerous goods by rail from and to contracting parties of the OSJD which are not Member States of the European Union.

---
#### STATE v. ROMERO

No. 145P82.

Case below: 56 N.C. App. 48.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 July 1982.
#### STATE v. JEFFUS

No. 71 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 734.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 May 1979.
!
 "#

	








#


  
 

 	











	






 $ !%

&$!'



 %"	







 #

	


	

(
"	




 

 
 )
	 *#

 
  )

   





#


)
 



# 
	

#


   

 
    	






$+,


#




 %"	
#



#


	+

 



	



	+
#



	



 
	




  	+
 









	!


#
 	+
#

 
  
   



)

  -  " 





)
#



 


	
 
   



	



 
   
 #


"	


	




	

	
	
			

					

			
 !	"		#

.
 
#
	+


"	







"	
")
-

)
	

)
 	
)


)		

	



/0$
	
#


 
	


	#

   )
 	
   


 

)"	




#
	+








	




 %"	




#

1




 %)
	"	
#


 
	




+#





 %	

"	






	


	


	"#

)"



 
	+
"

)
	





	 
	 


!
)		

&!0'

	
)

)
	

)
 

!0   
	 
 
 









)
 )
	



	




)


   
 
 	
  


 %
+



 



 %"#

	

$!#	



   	
 
 




 %
 


 


)

	
		 

  


	
")	




/0$



"



 

		


 
	


		




&1
2'

 "
 )
) 


	 		
 
  	 


!0			

)


   	  
   


	
)!0


  	   
 


#
	+








+	


 
 
  
   


  	
 + 
 
 

) /
   
   


 %"	


	
#


)




	




 
 	+
 	
 
 
 



 %	

"	

$!#	
#



		

				

	
		
	











	





	
	
	

/0$  )   
	



  	 
 #
 	+





#

   
 
  
  


 



"	
#

 
   
 #


	+
&1
3' 





4

 ")

)



	



 
 


	


 !0 
	
))
	



)
 

 5			

!0


 	
)  
 
   




 

 %
 	


)
 #

)
	 
   	
)  

!0


	

		


$+,
#


!.,

	
	






	







 
 	 
 
 














	





56

7898,
5 

,$7228:;;<

	
4		


&:<:38:7897'

1"4 3:33:<93

=#4 	>

)


)/0$(





		
		



	

 
  
  
	 

! " # $ 
 % 	 & 

'()))*+		


	+

,-	

.())) ./0.1+

	



		

	
	+2

	
3	!







		

4+


5	

	

		2



42
		

6
+"3	!
 	2



	

4447



3	


2


	
	+ 





	
	
	
			

					

			
 !	"		#

$%&%	'(	)*"

 +	
	$,--%./001

2		#	3	!'4

"		##		*)			!!

#2#	 #		!

	




	

.
 
#
	+


 "	
 






"	
")
#

-)
	

)
 	
#

)
)