alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 07-35]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 07-35 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: October 3, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 57915)          ( print page 57916)          ( print page 57917)          ( print page 57918)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 07-5015 Filed 10-10-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
#### AMERICAN TRAVEL CORP. v. CENTRAL CAROLINA BANK

No. 390P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 437.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 25 August 1982.
#### LINDER v. INSURANCE CO.

No. 39 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 486.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 May 1979.
POWER OF ATTORNEY
OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS OF
CLEAN ENERGY COMBUSTION SYSTEMS, INC.

The undersigned officer and/or director of Clean Energy
Combustion Systems, Inc.,  a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), which anticipates filing, with respect to its fiscal year ending December 31, 2001, an Annual Report on Form 10-K ("Annual Report") with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., hereby constitutes and appoints
John P. Thuot and Barry A. Sheahan, and each of them, severally, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, as attorneys or attorney to sign the Annual Report for the undersigned in any and all capacities, and any and all applications or other documents to be filed pertaining to the Annual Report with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever required and necessary to be done in the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned could do if personally present. The undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

EXECUTED this 26th day of March, 2002.



|    |                   
|--- | ------------------
|/s/ | John P. Thuot     
|    | John P. Thuot     
|    |                   
|/s/ | Barry A. Sheahan  
|    | Barry A. Sheahan  
|    |                   
|/s/ | John D. Chato     
|    | John D. Chato     
|    |                   
|/s/ | R. Dirk Stinson   
|    | R. Dirk Stinson   
|    |                   
|/s/ | William D. Jackson
|    | William D. Jackson
|    |                   
|/s/ | John Howard       
|    | John Howard       
|    |
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 7, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72730-72731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23728]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

18 CFR Parts 41, 158, 286 and 349

[Docket No. RM06-2-000]


Procedures for Disposition of Contested Audit Matters

November 30, 2005.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking: Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 20, 2005, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding procedures for the 
disposition of contested audit matters (70 FR 65866, November 1, 2005). 
The Commission is

[[Page 72731]]

extending the date for filing reply comments at the request of the 
Interstate Natural Gas Association.

DATES: Reply comments are due on or before December 9, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Reply comments may be filed electronically via the eFiling 
link on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov. Commenters 
unable to file comments electronically must send an original and 14 
copies of their comments to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
Office of the Secretary, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. 
Refer to the Comment Procedures section of the preamble for additional 
information on how to file comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John R. Kroeger, Office of Market 
Oversight and Investigations, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. (202) 502-8177.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Notice of Extension of Time

    On November 29, 2005, the Interstate Natural Gas Association of 
America (INGAA) filed a motion for an extension of time to file reply 
comments in response to the Commission's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
issued October 20, 2005, in the above-docketed proceeding. Procedures 
for Disposition of Contested Audit Matters, 113 FERC ] 61,069 (2005). 
The motion states that because of the extensive and substantial initial 
comments that were filed in this proceeding, the intervening 
Thanksgiving holiday and the press of the significant Commission 
proceedings in which INGAA is participating, INGAA requires additional 
time to consult with its members and prepare well-developed and 
responsive reply comments.
    Upon consideration, notice is hereby given that an extension of 
time for filing reply comments in this proceeding is granted to and 
including December 9, 2005, as requested by INGAA.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-23728 Filed 12-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### TAYLOR v. CP&L CO.

No. 113 PC

Case below: 49 NC App 205

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 January 1981.
Sixth Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Sixth Amendment to Employment Agreement 
 This Sixth Amendment to Employment Agreement (“Sixth
Amendment”) is entered into as of July 29, 2009, by and between DEL MONTE FOODS COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, with its principal place of business in San Francisco, California (“Company”) and RICHARD G. WOLFORD,
an individual residing in the State of California (“Executive”), to amend the Employment Agreement dated March 16, 1998 between the Company and Executive (“Employment Agreement”), as amended by the Second Amendment to
Employment Agreement entered into as of March 26, 2002 (“Second Amendment”), the Third Amendment to Employment Agreement entered into as of September 1, 2004 (“Third Amendment”), the Fourth Amendment to Employment
Agreement entered into as of September 1, 2005 (“Fourth Amendment”) and the Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement entered into as of August 1, 2007 (“Fifth Amendment”), as follows: 
 1. Sections 3(c)(ii), 3(d)(i)(2) and 3(e)(i)(2) shall be amended to add the phrase “and adjusted for performance” immediately after the phrase
“a pro rata portion of Executive’s target Bonus for the year in which Executive’s termination occurs, prorated for Executive’s actual employment period during such year” as it appears therein. 
 Except as expressly provided in this Sixth Amendment, all other provisions of the Employment Agreement and the Second through Fifth Amendments shall
remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Sixth Amendment as of the date set forth below.

  

					
	EXECUTIVE:	  		 	
			
	 /s/    Richard G. Wolford
	  		 	 July 29, 2009

	Richard G. Wolford	  		 	Date

  

							
	COMPANY:	  		 	
			
	DEL MONTE FOODS COMPANY	  		 	
				
	By:	 	 /s/    David L. Meyers
	  		 	 July 29, 2009

	Name:	 	David L. Meyers	  		 	Date
	Title:	 	 Executive Vice President
 Administration & Chief Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 3 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 4 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 5 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 6 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 7 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 8 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 9 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 10 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 11 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 12 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 13 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 14 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 15 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 16 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 17 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 18 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 19 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 20 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 21 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 22 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 23 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 24 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 25 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 26 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 27 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 28 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 29 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 30 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 31 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 32 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 33 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 34 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 35 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 36 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 37 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 38 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 39 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 40 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 41 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 42 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 43 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 44 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 37-6 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 45 of 45
#### STATE v. WOODS

No. 45.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 77.

Appeal dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 19(3) of the Rules of this Court and Rule 3(b) of the Supplementary Rules of this Court as interpreted in *In re Will of Adams,*268 N.C. 565, and *State v. Staten,*271 N.C. 600, 12 September 1974.
#### DAVIS v. McREE

No. 212 PC.

No. 121 (Fall Term).

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 238.

Petition by plaintiffs for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 10 September 1979 for the limited consideration of the trial judge’s instructions on the amount of credit, if any, the lessee is entitled on the purchase price for rental payments.
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 1 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 2 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 3 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 4 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 5 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 6 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 7 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 8 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 9 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 10 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 11 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 12 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 13 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 14 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 15 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 16 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 17 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 18 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 19 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 20 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 21 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 22 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 23 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 24 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 25 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-14 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 26 of 26
#### STATE v. TISE

No. 35 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 495.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 April 1979.
eChapman, INC.
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE  PRESENTS  that the  undersigned  Directors  and Executive
Officers of  eChapman,  INC.,  a Maryland  corporation,  hereby  constitute  and
appoint NATHAN A. CHAPMAN,  JR., and EARL U. BRAVO,  SR. and either of them, the
true and lawful agents and  attorney-in-fact  of the undersigned with full power
and  authority  in  either  said  agent  and  attorney-in-fact,  to sign for the
undersigned and in their respective names as Directors and Executive Officers of
eChapman,  Inc.,  the  Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB,  and any and all  further
amendments to said Report,  hereby  ratifying and  confirming  all acts taken by
such agent and attorney-in-fact, as herein authorized.

                                      DATE





/S/ NATHAN A. CHAPMAN, JR.                                April 15, 2002
---------------------------------------
Nathan A. Chapman, Jr., President and
Director (Principal Executive Officer)

/S/ DEMETRIS B. BROWN                                     April 15, 2002
---------------------------------------
Demetris B. Brown, Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Accounting and
Financial Officer)

/S/ EARL U. BRAVO, SR.                                    April 15, 2002
---------------------------------------
Earl U. Bravo, Sr., Director

/S/ DONALD V. WATKINS                                     April 15, 2002
---------------------------------------
Donald V. Watkins, Director

/S/ LOTTIE H. SHACKELFORD                                 April 15, 2002
---------------------------------------
Lottie H. Shackelford, Director

/S/ RAYMOND HAYSBERT                                      April 15, 2002
---------------------------------------
Raymond Haysbert, Director

/S/ MARK JEFFERSON                                        April 15, 2002
---------------------------------------
Mark Jefferson, Director

/S/ ADOLPH D. WASHINGTON                                  April 15, 2002
---------------------------------------
Adolph D. Washington, Director

/S/ THERON STOKES                                         April 15, 2002
---------------------------------------
Theron Stokes, Director
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1603 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the standard 

charitable mileage rate for delivery of meals to elderly, disabled, frail, 

and at-risk individuals. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2019 

Mr. KING (for himself, Mr. CORNYN, and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the standard charitable mileage rate for delivery of meals 

to elderly, disabled, frail, and at-risk individuals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Delivering Elderly 

5 Lunches and Increasing Volunteer Engagement and Reim6 bursements Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘DELIVER Act of 

7 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1603 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN STANDARD MILEAGE RATE FOR DE2 LIVERY OF MEALS TO ELDERLY, DISABLED, 

3 FRAIL, AND AT-RISK INDIVIDUALS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (i) of section 170 of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following: ‘‘In the case of use of such an 

7 automobile for the delivery of meals to homebound individ8 uals who are elderly, disabled, frail, or at risk, the mileage 

9 rate used shall be the standard business mileage rate spec10 ified by the Internal Revenue Service for the taxable year 

11 in which such miles are driven.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 subsection (a) shall apply to miles driven on or after the 

14 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 2 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 3 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 4 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 5 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 6 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 7 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 8 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 9 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 10 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 11 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 12 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 13 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 14 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 15 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 16 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 17 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 18 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 19 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 20 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-6 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 21 of 21
#### TEACHY v. COBLE DAIRIES, INC.

No. 174 PC.

Now No. 90 PA 82.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 688.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 3 March 1982.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-111303, 333-34420 and
333-73650), pertaining to the Jacada Ltd. 2003 Share Option and Incentive Plan, Jacada Ltd. 1999 Share Option and Incentive Plan, the Jacada Ltd. 1996 Share Option Plan and to the Jacada Ltd. 1994 Stock Option Plan, of our report, dated February 3,
2004 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Jacada Ltd. included in its Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                 |  |                                 
|---------------- |  | --------------------------------
|Tel-Aviv, Israel |  | KOST, FORER, GABBAY and KASEIRER
|June 27, 2004    |  | A member of Ernst & Young Global
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Veraso Medical Supply Corp., as Assignee of Vega, Carlos, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant.Abrams, Cohen &amp; Associates, P.C. (Frank Piccininni of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Katherine A. Levine, J.), entered April 19, 2016. The order, insofar as appealed from as limited by the brief, granted the branch of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the second cause of action.</p><p>ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, with $30 costs, and the branch of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the second cause of action is denied.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Civil Court as granted the branch of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the second cause of action on the ground that plaintiff had failed to provide requested verification.</p><p>Plaintiff correctly argues that the affidavit it submitted in opposition to defendant's motion was sufficient to give rise to a presumption that the requested verification had been mailed to, and received by, defendant (<i>see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co.</i>, 50 AD3d 1123 [2008]) and thus that there is a triable issue of fact as to whether the verification had been provided.</p><p>Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed and the branch of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the second cause of action is denied.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>July 12, 2019<br>Decision Date: July 12, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>