alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                    14,552
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,522
<PP&E>                                           9,478
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,543
<OTHER-SE>                                     763,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,955
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   166
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,757
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (12,591)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,591)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.306)


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-29 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-29 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-29 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-29 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-29 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-29 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-29 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-29 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-29 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-29 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-29 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-29 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-29 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-29 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-29 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-29 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 16 of 16
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-3669

___________

Jo Ann Hoffmann, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Western

* District of Arkansas.

Benton County, Administration; * [UNPUBLISHED]

Benton County Attorney, Robin *

Greene; Clyde Cummings, County *

Judge; David Greene, Arresting *

Officer, Bentonville Police *

Department; Bentonville City *

Police Department; Bobby Fanning; *

John Skaggs, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: December 24, 2001 

 Filed: January 23, 2002

___________

Before HANSEN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1

The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the

Honorable Beverly S. Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District

of Arkansas. 

-2-

JoAnn Hoffmann appeals the district court’s1 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000b(b) and 1985 action. Having carefully reviewed

the record, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (de

novo review), we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons the district court

stated. We note that even if Hoffmann filed her complaint on August 13, 2001, her

claims arising in August 1998 would still fail because the relevant defendants would

be entitled to absolute immunity. See Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12 (1991) (per

curiam) (judicial immunity); Brodnicki v. City of Omaha, 75 F.3d 1261, 1266-67 (8th

Cir.) (prosecutorial immunity), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 867 (1996). We also note that

the magistrate judge could screen the complaint without Hoffmann’s consent. See 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R.

47A(a).

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### STATE v. HENRY

No. 294P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 168.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 August 1982.
Exhibit 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                      TREASURER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Sec.1350,  the  undersigned,  Samir N. Masri,  who is the
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Lincoln International  Corporation (the
"Company"),  hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended April 30, 2006,  (the  "Report")  fully  complies with the
requirements  of Sec.13(a) or Sec.15(d) as applicable,  of the Securities Act of
1934 and that the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

                               /s/ Samir N. Masri
                                   --------------
                                   Name:  Samir N. Masri
                                   Title:  Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
                                   Date:  May 24, 2006
#### STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. 30.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 502.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 24 January 1978.
ex_178901.htm


Exhibit 4.2


 


DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK


 


The common stock of McorpCX, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) is traded in the United States on the OTCQB Venture Marketplace, operated by the OTC Markets Group under the symbol “MCCX.” and on the TSX Venture Exchange in Canada under the symbol “MCX”. All outstanding shares of common stock are validly issued, fully-paid and nonassessable.


 


The following is a summary of the terms of our common stock. This summary does not purport to be complete, and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by the full text of our Articles of Incorporation, as amended (the “Articles”) and the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), each of which is incorporated by reference as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K. We encourage you to read our Articles, our Bylaws and the applicable provisions of the California Corporations Code (the “Act”).


 


Voting Rights. Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held of record on the applicable record date on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders. A corporate action voted on by shareholders generally is approved, provided a quorum is present, if the action receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote on such action. Holders of our common stock are not entitled to cumulate their votes in the election of directors.


 


Dividend Rights. Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the Company’s board of directors out of funds legally available for that purpose.


 


Rights upon Liquidation. In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, whether voluntary or involuntary, the holders of our common stock are entitled to share ratably in all remaining assets available for distribution to shareholders after payment of, or provision for, our liabilities, subject to prior distribution rights of shares of the preferred stock, if any, then outstanding.


 


Preemptive Rights. Holders of our common stock do not have any preemptive rights to purchase, subscribe for or otherwise acquire any unissued or treasury shares or other of our securities.


 


Authorized but Unissued Shares of Common Stock


 


We are authorized under our articles of incorporation, as amended, to issue up to 500,000,000 shares of common stock.
#### STATE v. BEST

No. 93 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 204.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 9 February 1972.
#### SADIE L. LEDBETTER v. GRADY JUNIOR THOMAS.

(Filed 14 October, 1964.)

Appeal by defendant from *Brock, S. J.,*3 February 1964 Schedule “D” nonjury Session of MeCKlenbueg.

*Hollowell & Stott; Bailey & Booe for plaintiff appellee.*

*Carpenter, Webb & Golding; Childers Fowler for defendant appellant.*

Pee Cueiam.

The factual situation and the legal question involved in this appeal are identical to those in the case of *Deaton v. Thomas,*decided this day, *ante,*565.

On authority of the foregoing case, the judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2151 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2151

To amend section 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit 
immigration officers and agents of the Department of Homeland Security 
   from wearing clothing or other items bearing the word ``police''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2019

  Mr. Booker introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit 
immigration officers and agents of the Department of Homeland Security 
   from wearing clothing or other items bearing the word ``police''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Combating Deceptive Immigration 
Enforcement Practices Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON IMMIGRATION OFFICER UNIFORMS.

    Section 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1357) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Immigration officers and agents of the Department of Homeland 
Security, including officers and agents of U.S. Immigration and Customs 
Enforcement or U.S. Customs and Border Protection, may not wear any 
clothing, accessories, or other items on their person that bear the 
word `police' while performing duties under the immigration laws.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lannett Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Arthur P. Bedrosian, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Brian Kearns, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1. |   | The Report complies with the requirements of  Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              |
|----|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. |   | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

 

 
| Dated: February 11, 2009 | /s/Arthur P. Bedrosian                                            |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                                              |
|                     | Arthur P. Bedrosian,                                              |
|                     | President and Chief Executive Officer                             |
|                     |                                                              |
|                     |                                                              |
| Dated: February 11, 2009 | /s/Brian Kearns                                                   |
|                     |                                                              |
|                     | Brian Kearns,                                                     |
|                     | Vice President of Finance, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer |
#### Lynne Blake, Claimant, v State of New York, Defendant.

(Claim No. 73079.)

Court of Claims,

March 2,1987

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Lynne Blake,*claimant *pro se. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (William P. Kleen*of counsel), for defendant.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gerard M. Weisberg, J.

Uniformly, in tort actions against the State of New York, its answers and bills of particulars are verified by the Assistant Attorney-General assigned to the defense of the claim.

By this motion for an order of preclusion on the ground that the bill of particulars of the State’s verified answer was not sworn to by a person with actual knowledge of the facts, this long-standing practice is drawn into question.

A bill of particulars "shall” be verified if the pleading which it amplifies is also verified (CPLR 3044). It has been held that the rules applicable to verification of pleadings should be utilized in the case of a bill of particulars. *(See, Baldwin v Tinker,*48 Misc 2d 362; *Matter of Ross,*34 Misc 2d 1018; *893
      *Lipsky v Commerce-Pacific,*134 NYS2d 147; 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac |f 3044.03.)

CPLR 3020 (d) deals with by whom the required affidavit shall be made. Specifically, CPLR 3020 (d) (2) states: "if the party is the state, a governmental subdivision, board, commission, or agency, or a public officer in behalf of any of them, the verification may be made by any person *acquainted*with the facts” (emphasis added). This requirement has been satisfied. The Assistant Attorney-General deposes, upon information and belief, that its contents are true. In addition, his sources are averred as being "records and statements of officers, agents and employees of defendant”.

This is sufficient to demonstrate that he is "acquainted with the facts”, a standard which is not synonymous with "personal knowledge”. The latter has been compared to "firsthand” or "independent” knowledge of the facts. *(Davidowitz v Dixie Assocs.,*59 AD2d 659; Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3020:8, at 381.) It is required only in the limited instances specified in CPLR 3020 (d) (3).

In contrast, a pleader may become "acquainted” with facts through secondary sources, provided he identifies them. (CPLR 3021, 3020 [a]; *cf, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v State Div. of Human Rights,*48 AD2d 391; *Matter of D’Elia [Doreen H.] v Sandy B.,*132 Misc 2d 60.) This was done in the instant case. Claimant’s motion is, therefore, denied.
**Exhibit10.41**

 

Preparer                        **NathanH. Sevilla, Esq., Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP, 1675 Broadway, New York, NY10019, (212) 506-2196**

Information

 

**SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE**

**FOR RECORDER**

 

**RELEASE OF REAL ESTATE MORTGAGE**

 

The undersigned, thepresent owner of the mortgage hereinafter described, does hereby acknowledgethat a certain mortgage bearing date of the 13th day of May, 2005,made and executed by **DIAMOND JO WORTH, LLC**to **WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL, INC., AS AGENT**and recorded in the records of the office of the Recorder of the County of Worth,State of Iowa, as document number **20051170** on the16th Day of May, 2005 and encumbering the land set forth on ExhibitA attached hereto is redeemed, paid off, satisfied and discharged in full.

 

Words and phrases herein,including acknowledgment hereof, shall be construed as in the singular orplural number, and as masculine, feminine or neuter gender, according to thecontext.

 

Dated this 19thday of July, 2005.

 

 

 
|   | **WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL, INC.,**                    |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | a California corporation, as Agent and as a Lender |
|   |                                               |   |
|   | By:                                                | /s/ Larissa Megerdichian |
|   | Name:                                              | Larissa Megerdichian |
|   | Title:                                             | Vice President |
|        |                                                    |  |  |  |

 

----

 

EXHIBIT A

 

Legal Description of RealProperty

 

Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 in Block 1 and lot 5 in Block2, Top of Iowa Addition, Worth County, Iowa, according to the recorded platthereof.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Qorus.com,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year  ending  December  31,  2004,  (the  "Report"),  I, Kevin R.
Keating, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)    The Report fully  complies with the  requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.


Date:  March 14, 2005                                /s/ Kevin R. Keating
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ISSUER'S
INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, SET FORTH IN THE
ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U. S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                              99
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,935
<ALLOWANCES>                                       300
<INVENTORY>                                      4,573
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,856
<PP&E>                                          32,606
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,391
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,611
<BONDS>                                         17,627
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           819
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,393
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,450
<SALES>                                         29,374
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,374
<CGS>                                           20,753
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,095
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (157)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   313
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 708
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,415
<INCOME-TAX>                                       649
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                766
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (2,107)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,341)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03547-SHS     Document 9      Filed 06/18/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-03547-SHS     Document 9      Filed 06/18/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-03547-SHS     Document 9      Filed 06/18/2007     Page 3 of 3
#### WHITE v. RASCOE

No. 7 PC.

Case below: 53 N.C. App. 372.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 December 1981.
#### S. F. McCOTTER & SONS v. O.H.A. INDUSTRIES

No. 107 PC.

Now No. 7 PA 82.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 151.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 12 January 1982.
Case 1:07-cv-03478-AKH Document 13 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03478-AKH Document 13 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 13 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 13 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 13 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 2 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 3 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 4 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 5 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 6 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 7 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 8 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 9 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 10 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 11 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 12 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 13 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 14 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 15 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 16 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 17 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 18 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 19 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 20 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 21 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-38 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 22 of 22