alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 17 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 17 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Alton Cleveland, Appellant.

(Argued October 30, 1918;

decided November 19, 1918.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, rendered June 17, 1918, at a Trial Term for the county of Kings, upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of murder in the first degree.

*Robert H. Elder*and *Otho S. Bowling*for appellant.

*Harry E. Lewis, District Attorney {Harry G. Anderson*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo and Pound, JJ. Absent: Andrews, J.
Bontan
      Corporation Inc.
                    47
      Avenue Road, Suite 200
                    Toronto,
      Ontario, Canada M5R 2G3
                    T:  416-860-0211
                    F:  416-361-6228
                    W:  www.bontancorporation.com


March 28,
2008                                                                                     Exhibit
4  ( c) 3








John
Robinson


11
McMaster Avenue


Toronto,
Ontario


M4V
1A8








Dear Mr.
Robinson:





We refer
to the consulting agreement dated April 1, 2003 that expired on June 30, 2004
and being extended on a year to year basis. The last extension is up to June 30,
2008.





We also
refer to our meeting this morning where you presented us with a proposal for
further services for another year at a cost of approx. $82,000 – same as last
year and  agreed to accept 350,000 common shares of Bontan valued at
the market price of US$0.23 or CDN$0.23 – being the market price of the shares
on March 28, 2008.





As a
result of an assessment of our current requirements, it appears that we will
need to retain your services for another year.  We therefore confirm
that your services contract is extended for another year to June 30, 2009 on the
same terms and conditions as outlined in the Agreement dated April 1, 2003,
except for the Work Fee (clause 3).





If you
accept the terms of our renewal, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter
and return it to our office.





Yours
truly,





BONTAN
CORPORATION INC.





Sd:  Kam
Shah





Kam Shah,
CA CPA


Chief
Executive Officer


Chief
Financial Officer





AGREED
AND ACCEPTED











Sd:  John
Robinson


_____________________


John
Robinson
Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 27-7      Filed 05/22/2008     Page 1 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 27-7      Filed 05/22/2008     Page 2 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 27-7      Filed 05/22/2008     Page 3 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 27-7      Filed 05/22/2008     Page 4 of 4
Dismiss and Opinion Filed July 29, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-15-00576-CR

ANGELA DAWN CLAMPITT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-81729-2014

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Schenck

Opinion by Justice Lang

Angela Dawn Clampitt was convicted by a jury of abandoning or endangering a child. 

See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.041(a), (b), (c), (d)(1) (West 2011). The trial court sentenced 

appellant to two years’ confinement in a state jail facility on April 9, 2015. On June 22, 2015, 

the trial court granted appellant’s motion for new trial.1 The trial court’s order granting 

appellant’s motion for new trial returned the case to its original position and the judgment is no 

longer in place to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 21.9(b); Waller v. State, 931 S.W.2d 640, 643–44 

(Tex. App.––Dallas 1996, no pet.).

 

1

The State’s appeal from the trial court’s order granting the motion for new trial is docketed as 05-15-00901-CR, The State of Texas v. 

Angela Dawn Clampitt.
–2–

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

150576F.U05

/Douglas S. Lang/

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

ANGELA DAWN CLAMPITT, Appellant

No. 05-15-00576-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District 

Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-81729-2014.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang,. Justices 

Bridges and Schenck participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 29th day of July, 2015.
#### STATE v. REDFERN

No. 106 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 230.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 28 January 1972.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ISSUER'S
INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, SET FORTH IN THE
ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U. S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                             152
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,027
<ALLOWANCES>                                       321
<INVENTORY>                                      4,129
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,330
<PP&E>                                          31,556
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,716
<BONDS>                                          9,138
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           819
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,902
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,756
<SALES>                                         37,280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,280
<CGS>                                           28,382
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,664
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (309)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 485
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,440
<INCOME-TAX>                                       665
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                775
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       775
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. ELLISON

No. 288 PC.

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 767.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 10 September 1979.
#### STATE v. WILKINS

No. 98 PC.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 691.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 November 1974.
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 1 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 2 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 3 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 4 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 5 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 6 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 7 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 8 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 9 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 10 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 11 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 12 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 13 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 14 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 15 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 16 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 17 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 18 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 19 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 20 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 21 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 22 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 23 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 24 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 25 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 26 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 27 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 28 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 29 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 30 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 31 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 32 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 33 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 34 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 35 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 36 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 37 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 38 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03558-LAK Document 9 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. LEE

No. 37 PC.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 560.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 April 1975.
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-41 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-41 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-41 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 3 of 3
#### STATE v. AUSTIN

No. 22 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 395.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 March 1976.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 29, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 71463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23410]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Alaska Saltwater Sport Fishing Economic Survey.
    Form Number(s): None.
    OMB Approval Number: None.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 1,380.
    Number of Respondents: 3,276.
    Average Hours Per Response: 25 minutes.
    Needs and Uses: The objective of this project is to collect data 
necessary for estimating the demand for saltwater fishing trips by 
Alaska saltwater anglers and for understanding the factors affecting 
this demand. This information is needed to improve federal management 
decisions affecting Alaska saltwater recreational fisheries, 
principally the halibut fishery. The data collection consists of 
conducting a formal pretest and full implementation of a mail survey 
using a random sample of U.S. residents who have purchased a license to 
fish in Alaska.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: One time only.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#44200c3d2a212f04202b276a232b32"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="93f7dbeafdf6f8d3f7fcf0bdf4fce5">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-7285, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bcf8ddcad5d8e3eed3cfc8d7d9cefcd3d1de92d9d3cc92dbd3ca"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="387c594e515c676a574b4c535d4a7857555a165d5748165f574e">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 22, 2005.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-23410 Filed 11-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Court of Appeals

First District of Texas

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Texas 77002-2066

SHERRY RADACK

 CHIEF JUSTICE

TERRY JENNINGS

EVELYN KEYES

LAURA CARTER HIGLEY

JANE BLAND

MICHAEL MASSENGALE

HARVEY BROWN

REBECA HUDDLE

RUSSELL LLOYD

 JUSTICES

CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT

JANET WILLIAMS

 CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

PHONE: 713-274-2700

FAX: 713-755-8131

 www.txcourts.gov/1stcoa.aspx

May 22, 2015

Khristel L. Samarripa

Admin. Asst. II

Office of the Attorney General

Criminal Appeals Division 

William P. Clements Bldg. 8th Floor

300w. 15th Street

Austin, Texas 78701

khristel.samarripa@texasattorneygeneral.gov 

(512) 475-3321

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 01-12-00888-CR Trial Court Case Number: 1359172

Style: Ricky Barnard Justice v. The State of Texas

We are forwarding the records for the above referenced cause via the FTP site.

Sincerely,

Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court

By Jesse Rodriguez, Deputy Clerk IV
#### STATE v. BYRD

No. 263 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 172.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 10 September 1979.
#### STATE v. HOLT

No. 1 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 339.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 February 1972.
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of IVAX Diagnostics, Inc.



|                          |  |  |  |                                                             
|------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary        |  |  |  | State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
|Delta Biologicals, S.r.l. |  |  |  | Italy                                                       
|                          |  | 
|Diamedix Corporation      |  |  |  | State of Florida                                            
|                          |  | 
|ImmunoVision, Inc.        |  |  |  | State of Florida
Case 1:07-cv-03528-CM     Document 6-6      Filed 06/05/2008     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03528-CM     Document 6-6      Filed 06/05/2008     Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23.1

                  INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Advanced BioPhotonics Inc. (F/K/A OmniCorder Technologies, Inc.) (A Development
Stage Enterprise) on Form S-8 (File No. 333-123883) of our report which includes
an explanatory paragraph as to the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern dated March 20, 2006 with respect to our audits of the financial
statements of Advanced BioPhotonics Inc. (F/K/A OmniCorder Technologies, Inc.)
(A Development Stage Enterprise) as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the period from February 7, 1997
(inception) to December 31, 2005, which report is included in this Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB of Advanced BioPhotonics Inc. (F/K/A OmniCorder Technologies,
Inc.) (A Development Stage Enterprise) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ Marcum & Kliegman LLP
Melville, New York

March 29, 2006
Exhibit
10.7


 


Administrative
Services Agreement


 


This
Administrative Service Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated
this           the day of           , 2022 is between Yotta Investment LLC, herein referred
to as “Service Provider” and Yotta Acquisition Corporation, herein referred to as “Customer”.


 


Service
Provider has agreed to provide services to the Customer on the terms and conditions set out in this Agreement, while Customer is of the
opinion that Service Provider has the proper and necessary qualifications, experience and abilities to provide services to Customer.


 


Therefore
in consideration of the matters described above, the receipt and sufficiency of which consideration is hereby acknowledged, the Customer
and the Service Provider agree as follows:


 


		1.	Scope
    of Work



 

The
Service Provider is to provide the Customer with the following services (the “Services”): general and administrative services,
including office space, administrative and support services, as may be reasonably required by the Company.


 


The
services will include any other tasks which the Customer and the Service Provider may agree on.


 


		2.	Term
    of Agreement



 

This
Agreement will begin on [_______], 2022 and will remain in full force and effect until the earlier of the consummation by the
Company of an initial business combination or the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration Statement
for the Company’s initial public offering) unless terminated earlier pursuant to the terms hereof. This Agreement may be extended
by mutual written agreement of the parties.


 


		3.	Trust
    Waiver



 

Yotta
Investment LLC hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set
aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO and will not seek
recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


		4.	Termination
   



 

If
either party seeks termination of this Agreement, the terminating party must provide a 30 days written notice to the other party.


 


		5.	Compensation
   



 

The
Customer will provide compensation to the Service Provider of $10,000 per month for the services rendered by the Service Provider as
required by this Agreement. Compensation is payable at the completion of services.


 






     


     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have duly affixed their signatures under hand on this [_______] day of [_______], 2022.


 


	 	Yotta
    Investment LLC
	 	 


	 	By:	 
	 	Name: 	Chen
    Chen
	 	Title:	Member
	 	 	 
	 	Yotta
    Acquisition Corporation
	 	 


	 	By:	 
	 	Name:	Hui
    Chen
	 	Title:	Chief
    Executive Officer



 


Signature
Page to Administrative Services Agreement
The Football Association Premier League Limited et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al Doc. 123

Dockets.Justia.com
#### LEA v. DUDLEY

No. 60 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 281.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 March 1976.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                           1,636,207
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,165,583
<ALLOWANCES>                                       626,334
<INVENTORY>                                     14,112,224
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,238,199
<PP&E>                                          72,342,040
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,800,057
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,552,829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,107,980
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         8,432,626
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,992,778
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,552,829
<SALES>                                        110,191,475
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               110,191,475
<CGS>                                           80,365,025
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,365,025
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,702,579
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   237,334
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,051,793
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,834,744
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,483,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,351,744
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,351,744
<EPS-BASIC>                                         1.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.49



</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-14976-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1