alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
             PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lancaster Colony Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John B. Gerlach, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date:  February 13, 2003            By:  /s/JOHN B. GERLACH, JR.
                                         -----------------------
                                            John B. Gerlach, Jr.
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE v. RIALTO WILLIAM FARRINGTON.

(Filed 2 December, 1964.)

Appeal by defendant from *Crissman, J.,*March 11, 1963 Criminal Session of Guileoed (High Point Division).

Defendant was tried in the criminal division of the High Point Municipal Court upon a warrant charging that on December 27, 1962, he wilfully and unlawfully operated an automobile on South Wrenn Street, a public highway within the city limits of High Point, while under the influence of intoxicating liquors. Upon conviction and sentence, he appealed to the Superior Court, where he was tried *de novo*upon a plea of not guilty. The verdict was guilty as charged in the warrant. From a judgment that defendant pay a fine of $125.00 defendant appeals.

*Attorney General Bruton; Assistant Attorney General Ray B.. Brady; and Staff Attorney L. P. Homthal, Jr., for the State.*

*Boyan •& Wilson for defendant.*

PER CüRiam.

The State’s evidence was fully sufficient to support the verdict. Defendant offered no evidence. He was arrested immediately after he parked his automobile and attempted to walk down South Wrenn Street. Two police officers who observed him on the occasion in question testified, after describing his appearance, speech, and manner of walking, that in their opinion defendant was appreciably under the influence of an intoxicant. One said, “(H)e was drunk, plain drunk.” *129When asked why he was driving a car in his condition, defendant replied, according to the officer, “that he could not very well walk.”

The assignment of error directed to the court’s refusal to sustain defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit is overruled. The assignments addressed to the charge are likewise without merit. The remaining assignments do not charge errors which, in our opinion, could have affected the verdict. The burden is on the defendant to show not only error but also prejudicial error. *State v. Gibson,*233 N.C. 691, 65 S.E. 2d 508.

No error.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TERRANCE A. BARGNARE,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv43/MCR/MD

COUNTY OF SANTA ROSA,

Defendant.

___________________________________________________________________

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff commenced this

action on February 9, 2010 by filing a civil rights complaint. Plaintiff failed to file a motion

for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and on February 17, 2010, he was given twentyeight (28) days in which to do so (doc. 3). Plaintiff responded by filing motions to proceed

in forma pauperis (docs. 4 & 5). However, he failed to include a prisoner consent form and

was given thirty (30) more days to do so (doc. 6).

After receiving no response from plaintiff, this court entered an order on May 11,

2010 giving plaintiff fourteen (14) days to show why this case should not be dismissed for

failure to comply with an order of the court (doc. 7). To date, plaintiff has failed to comply

with this court’s orders or explain his inability to do so.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and

failure to comply with an order of the court.

2. That the clerk be directed to close the file.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 9 day of June, 2010.

th

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not control. A copy

of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope

of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858

F.2d 698, 701 (11 Cir. 1988). th

Case No: 3:10cv43/MCR/MD
Case 1:06-cv-15068-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk October 5, 2012 

# Order

October 5, 2012

144144

- 5(55)(56)

FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

and

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO.,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 144144

v COA: 298984

Mason CC: 09

- 000035

- NF

MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________________________

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO

., Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 144145

v COA: 298985

Mason CC: 09

- 000172

- NF

MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, motions by defendants

- appellees f or extension of

the time for filing their combined brief are considered and they are granted.
Heat Stress

Understand heat stress risk factors, prevention, and treatment

All photos by ©Thinkstock unless otherwise noted. 

Know your risk factors

Health Problems

• Diarrhea, vomiting, cold,

or the flu

• Chronic conditions, such as 

diabetes and heart disease

• Being overweight or obese

• Poor physical fitness

Activities

• High exertion

• Not enough rest breaks

• Repeated strenuous 

days in the heat

• Working through discomfort 

Photo by NIOSH

Environment

• High temperatures and 

humidity

• Direct sun exposure

• Lack of wind or breeze 

• Closeness to engines or hot equipment

Medications

Medications taken for: 

• muscle spasms 

• blood pressure 

• diarrhea

• urine production (diuretics)

• cold, allergies, and congestion

• dizziness/vertigo 

• psychosis

• depression Other Factors

• Dehydration

• Prior heat illness

• Age over 60

• Prolonged PPE use

• Non-breathable clothing

• Alcohol use in the past 24 hours

Poor Acclimatization

Those requiring acclimatization:

• New workers

• Experienced workers used to heat 

but returning from time away

• Any worker experiencing sudden 

temperature changes (e.g., chiller failure)

Stay hydrated

• Drink before feeling thirsty. By the time you feel thirsty, you 

are already behind in fluid replacement. 

• When working in the heat, drink 1 cup (8 ounces) every 

15–20 minutes (about 1 quart per hour).

How much water is that?

= approx

= 1 

quart

1/4 gallon

(32 oz)

4 cups = 1 

liter

• Hydrate before and after work.

• Replace electrolytes by eating regular meals. 

• Sports drinks can also replace electrolytes but are not 

usually necessary.

• Avoid energy drinks.

Urine

Color

Test

Well 

Hydrated Hydrated Dehydrated

Drink water!

Severely Dehydrated

Drink water immediately!

Get acclimatized to the heat

• Gradually get used to the heat over about 7–14 days.

• Remember that about one week away from work weakens 

your acclimatization.

• Remember that about one month away from work requires 

re-acclimatization when returning to the job.

Apply first aid for heat illness

• Heat stress: sit or rest in a cool place, slowly 

drink water or clear juice.

• Heat exhaustion: remove worker from hot area, 

give liquids, remove unnecessary clothing, cool with water, 

ice, fans, or whatever is available.

• Heat stroke: call for emergency care immediately, 

especially with any mental status change, cool with water, 

ice, fans, or whatever is available.

Heat stroke can be fatal if treatment is delayed. 

Cooling and emergency care are the priorities.

Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2018-116
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000057497
<NAME> THE LAMSON & SESSIONS CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                             587
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,352
<INVENTORY>                                     39,523
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,805
<PP&E>                                         117,396
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,749
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 174,004
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,484
<BONDS>                                         45,906
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,344
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   174,004
<SALES>                                         74,482
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,482
<CGS>                                           60,352
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,116
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,087
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (700)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,787
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,787
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

      ( print page 57579)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandra M. Peay, Contact Representative or Renee Hallman, Contact Representative.

Federal Trade Commission, Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room H-303, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3100.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 07-4969 Filed 10-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1826 

To modify the penalties for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection 

Act of 1993. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 13, 2019 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO (for herself, Mr. SCHUMER, Ms. HASSAN, and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To modify the penalties for violations of the Telephone 

Consumer Protection Act of 1993. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Deter Obnoxious, Ne5 farious, and Outrageous Telephone Calls Act of 2019’’ or 

6 the ‘‘DO NOT Call Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE TELEPHONE 

8 CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT OF 1993. 

9 (a) CRIMINAL PENALTIES.— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1826 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 227 of the Commu2 nications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227) is amended 

3 by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(i) CRIMINAL PENALTIES.— 

5 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para6 graph (2), any person who willfully and knowingly 

7 violates this section shall be imprisoned for not more 

8 than 1 year, fined under title 18, United States 

9 Code, or both. 

10 ‘‘(2) AGGRAVATED OFFENSE.—Any person who 

11 willfully and knowingly violates this section shall be 

12 imprisoned for not more than 3 years, fined under 

13 title 18, United States Code, or both if— 

14 ‘‘(A) the person has previously been con15 victed under this subsection; 

16 ‘‘(B) the offense involved initiating more 

17 than— 

18 ‘‘(i) 100,000 calls in a 24-hour period; 

19 ‘‘(ii) 1,000,000 calls in a 30-day pe20 riod; or 

21 ‘‘(iii) 10,000,000 calls in a 1-year pe22 riod; 

23 ‘‘(C) the person committed the offense 

24 with the intent to use the calls in furtherance 

25 of a felony or conspiracy to commit a felony; or 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1826 IS

1 ‘‘(D) the offense caused loss to 1 or more 

2 persons aggregating $5,000 or more in value 

3 during any 1-year period. 

4 ‘‘(3) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this sub5 section— 

6 ‘‘(A) the term ‘call’ includes a message or 

7 other communication; and 

8 ‘‘(B) the term ‘initiate’, with respect to a 

9 call, includes the act of sending, making, or 

10 transmitting a call, message, or other commu11 nication, as applicable.’’. 

12 (2) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMEND13 MENT.—Section 227(e)(5)(B) of the Communica14 tions Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227(e)(5)(B)) is 

15 amended, in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘sec16 tion 501’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (i)’’. 

17 (b) INCREASED PENALTIES FOR PROVISION OF INAC18 CURATE CALLER IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION.—Sec19 tion 227(e)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 

20 U.S.C. 227(e)(5)) is amended— 

21 (1) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking 

22 ‘‘$10,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$20,000’’; and 

23 (2) in subparagraph (B), in the first sentence, 

24 by striking ‘‘$10,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$20,000’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC Document 10 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC Document 10 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC Document 10 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC Document 10 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC Document 10 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC Document 10 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC Document 10 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC Document 10 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC Document 10 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC Document 10 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC Document 10 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC Document 10 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC Document 10 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 13 of 13
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of
the United States Code

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Joseph M. Redling, the Chief Executive Officer of Nutrisystem, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that based on the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | The Companys Form 10-K Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 7, 2011

/S/ JOSEPH M. REDLINGChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
*

VtORECEIED'4PPhTED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CLERK RTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

'EP 1 6 2010 '

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SOWN lOuuuul432SD

VS USDC NO. 1:09-cv-00257-MP -AK

USCA NO. __________

THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES,THE UNIVERSITY OF

FLORIDA,LEVIN COLLEGE OF LAW,ROBERT H JERRY, II

TRANSMITTAL OF NOTICE OF APPEAL

The following documents are hereby transmitted to the Clerk, U. S. Court of Appeals.

The Certified copy of the appeal notice, docket entries, judgment/opinion/order appealed from

are enclosed.

First Appeal Notice.

Judge appealed from: Maurice M. Paul

Court Reporter(s): Christine Bordenave

Please acknowledge receipt on the enclosed copy of this transmittal to: GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SHEILA HURST-RAYBORN,

ACTING CLERK OF COURT

s/JUDY STONE

By: Judy Stone

Deputy Clerk

401 SE 1St Avenue, Ste 243

September 14, 2010 Gainesville, Florida 32601

Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -GRJ Document 152 Filed 09/20/10 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE>
                                                                                                 EXHIBIT 12

                     KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY
        Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                (in thousands except ratio data)
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                    Twelve
                                                                                                    Months
                                                              Year Ended December 31,               Ended
                                                  1992       1993       1994      1995      1996    6/30/97 
<S>                                             <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Fixed Charges:                                                                                    
  Interest on First Mortgage Bonds . . . . . .  $13,275    $17,472    $19,090   $19,090   $14,914   $14,038
  Interest on Other Long-term Debt . . . . . .    7,668      2,033       -        2,422     6,446     8,188
  Interest on Short-term Debt. . . . . . . . .      413      1,001      1,621     2,242     2,849     2,979
  Miscellaneous Interest Charges . . . . . . .      861        523        485       510       555       542
  Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals.      800        800        700       700       800       800
       Total Fixed Charges . . . . . . . . . .  $23,017    $21,829    $21,896   $24,964   $25,564   $26,547
                                                                                                  
Earnings:                                                                                         
  Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  $26,537    $18,031    $25,273   $25,128   $16,973   $20,120
  Plus Federal Income Taxes. . . . . . . . . .    1,465      1,620      2,178     3,914     5,119     7,811
  Plus State Income Taxes. . . . . . . . . . .    1,891      1,116      1,154     1,420       598     1,396
  Plus Fixed Charges (as above). . . . . . . .   23,017     21,829     21,896    24,964    25,564    26,547
       Total Earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . .  $52,910    $42,596    $50,501   $55,426   $48,254   $55,874

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges . . . . . .     2.29       1.95       2.30      2.22      1.88      2.10
</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-15155-AKH Document 6 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-15155-AKH Document 6 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-15155-AKH Document 6 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-15155-AKH Document 6 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 32.1

        Joint Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal
            Financial Officer Required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b)

      In connection with the Annual Report of Advanced BioPhotonics Inc. F/K/A
OmniCorder Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), we, Denis O'Connor, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Celia
I. Schiffner, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2003, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

March 30, 2005

                                  /s/ Denis A. O'Connor
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Denis A. O'Connor
                                  President and Chief Executive Officer


                                  /s/ Celia I. Schiffner
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Celia I. Schiffner
                                  Controller and Principal Accounting Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129919 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129919 

 COA: 261758 
 Marquette CC: 82-014434

EARL PAUL PLEAU,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d0123 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 30, 2006 

Clerk