alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel Special Emphasis Panel or Review of R25 Applications.                    

*Date:*                         March 30-31, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         6 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Wyndham City Center Hotel, 1143 New Hampshire Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20037.                    

*Contact Person:*                         David E. Maslow, PhD, Chief, Resources and Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard—Room 8117, Bethesda, MD 20892-7405, (301) 496-2330.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 2, 2005.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-2350 Filed 2-7-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### HERNDON v. ROBINSON

No. 353P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 318.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 August 1982. Motion by defendant to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 3 August 1982.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DEVENSON A. WALKER

, Appellant,

v.

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING , LLC, et al

., Appellee.

No. 4D 21

- 2948

[ May 5, 2022 ]

Appeal of nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Andrea Gundersen , Judge; L.T. Case

No . CACE18

- 01706

.

Devonson A. Walker, Sunrise, pro se.

Richard S. McIver of Kass Shuler, P.A.

, Tampa , for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, D AMOORGIAN and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### INSURANCE CO. v. CURRY

No. 55 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 286.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 April 1976.
#### MACHINERY CO. v. INSURANCE CO.

No. 112 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 85.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 28 January 1972.
#### IN RE McELWEE

No. 461P82.

Case below: 51 N.C. App. 163.

Petition by Taxpayers for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 21 September 1982.
#### STATE v. LUCKEY

No. 145.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 178.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 12 January 1982.
```

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Marc Baker, the Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer of Hunno
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1)      the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
         December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
         of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
         U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: May 14, 2003

                                              /s/    Marc Baker
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Name:  Marc Baker
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer &
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
```
Penelope 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 17, 2014

No. 04-13-00903-CV

John Edward SOTO II, a.k.a, Jonathan Herrasti,

Appellant

v.

Penelope Jo SOTO,

Appellee

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-00460

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due April 3, 2014. We granted appellant an extension

until June 3, 2014, to file his brief. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time has been 

filed.

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to file, on or before July 1, 2014, his appellant’s brief 

and a written response reasonably explaining (1) his failure to timely file the brief and (2) why 

appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. If appellant fails 

to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we will dismiss this appeal for want 

of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing 

involuntary dismissal if appellant has failed to comply with a court order).

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of June, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   9-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               SEP-30-1999
[CASH]                                         807,010
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                    8,636
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                               815,646
[PP&E]                                          68,437
[DEPRECIATION]                                 (7,481)
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                 880,756
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                          121,709
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                       614,648
[OTHER-SE]                                     476,687
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                   880,756
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                 3,877
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                               443,294
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                              (439,417)
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                                  0
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                 (439,417)
[EPS-BASIC]                                   (0.04)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                   (0.04)
</TABLE>
#### STATE v. MILLER

No. 135 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 770.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1977. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 13 June 1977.
# C_2011227EN.01000501.xml

| 2.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/5

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

2011/C 227/04

Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

Page 55

Page 55

The Explanatory Notes to subheading 0904 20 10 are amended as follows:

0904 20 10

‘0904 20 10   Sweet peppers

The peppers of this subheading (Capsicum annuum) are relatively large in size and have a sweet flavour (without a burning taste). They can have different colours. This subheading covers only dry peppers, whole or in pieces but neither crushed nor ground.’.

---

(1)  OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 137, 6.5.2011, p. 1.

2

---
Case 1:07-cv-03557-AKH     Document 5      Filed 01/17/2008     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03558-LAK Document 6 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03558-LAK Document 6 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03579-LTS-MHD Document 21 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03579-LTS-MHD Document 21 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES CONTAINED THEREIN
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          23,290
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,014
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    777,253
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,034,532
<ALLOWANCE>                                      8,820
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,886,153
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,118,881
<SHORT-TERM>                                    86,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             21,376
<LONG-TERM>                                    127,944
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           289
<OTHER-SE>                                     531,163
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,886,153
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 69,694
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               34,787
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,552
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               106,033
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              45,895
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              56,444
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           49,589
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,030
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               2,850
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 50,928
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,594
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,783
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,783
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.16
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,523
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 7,626
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      942
<RECOVERIES>                                       106
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                8,820
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             8,820
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS LEGEND  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE
CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COYOTE NETWORKS SYSTEMS, INC. AS
OF AND FOR THE  QUARTER  ENDED  DECEMBER  31,  1999,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                 613
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        20498
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (522)
<INVENTORY>                                           2249
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     24777
<PP&E>                                                9825
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (3116)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       46447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                29117
<BONDS>                                               1464
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                           5900
<COMMON>                                             14495
<OTHER-SE>                                          (12249)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         46447
<SALES>                                               6822
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      6822
<CGS>                                                 6319
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         6319
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      5149
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (5114)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (5114)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (5114)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.39)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.01

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Ali Jenab,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of VA
Software  Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005 fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that  information  contained  in such Annual  Report on
Form 10-K fairly presents in all material  respects the financial  condition and
results of operations of VA Software Corporation.


                                By:      /s/ ALI JENAB
                                   ------------------------------------
                                Name:  Ali Jenab
                                Title:   Chief Executive Officer and President


                                       81
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                          229042
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    41846
<ALLOWANCES>                                     19782
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                251106
<PP&E>                                         3597246
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2482018
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1366334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           119365
<BONDS>                                         385244
<COMMON>                                        780573
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       81152
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1366334
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 73814
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    83026
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               10099
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17140)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17140)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17140)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
#### ELIZABETH F. GORRELL, Plaintiff v. C. PAUL GORRELL, Defendant.

(Filed 5 May, 1965.)

Contempt of Court § 3—

In order to support a commitment for contempt for failure to pay into court sums directed by prior order, the court must find facts in regard to defendant’s assets and liabilities and his ability to pay and work, sufficient to support a finding that the failure to pay was wilful.

Appeal by defendant from *Gambill, J.,*in chambers in Guilfoed.

Action for alimony without divorce.

On June 26, 1964, Judge Gwyn entered an order requiring, *inter alia,*that defendant pay $20.00 each Monday to the office of the Domestic Relations Court for the use of plaintiff *pendente lite.*He further ordered defendant to pay plaintiff’s counsel a fee of $125.00. On August 10, 1964, plaintiff filed an affidavit in which she averred that defendant had made no payment. Pursuant to an order to show cause why he should not be adjudged in contempt, on September 8, 1964, defendant appeared with his counsel • before Judge Gambill. Plaintiff did not appear. The record discloses the following proceedings only: “The defendant exhibited to the Court the record of his income, showing that he had not been financially able to make the payments required in the order entered by the Hon. Allen H. Gwyn, and that he had not wil-fully violated the court order. No further evidence was presented.”

On September 11, 1964, Judge Gambill, acting under G.S. 5-8, found that defendant has refused, and still refuses, to make the payments specified in the order of June 26, 1964, “and has failed to show cause why he should not be cited for contempt.” He committed defendant to jail, “there to remain” until the sums due under Judge Gwyn’s order and the costs of the contempt proceeding “shall be paid” and “until he be thence discharged according to law.” From this “warrant for commitment,” defendant appeals.

*John F. Comer for plaintiff appellee.*

*Cahoon ■& Swisher for defendant appellant.*

PER Cueiam.

The order attaching defendant for contempt is fatally defective in that it is not supported by a finding of fact that defendant’s failure to make the required payments was wilful. “Our decisions uniformly hold that in contempt proceedings it is necessary for the court to find the facts supporting the judgment and especially the facts as to the purpose and object of the contemner, since nothing short of ‘willful disobedience’ will justify punishment.” *Smith v. Smith,*247 N.C. 223, *404225, 100 S.E. 2d 370, 372; *accord, Smith v. Smith,*248 N.C. 298, 103 S.E. 2d 400; *Yow v. Yow,*243 N.C. 79, 89 S.E. 2d 867.

Before the court may determine whether a husband’s failure to pay is a wilful disobedience of its orders, *i.e.,*done “knowingly and of stubborn purpose,” *Lamm v. Lamm,*229 N.C. 248, 250, 49 S.E. 2d 403, 404, the judge must “find what are his assets and liabilities and his ability to pay and work — an inventory of his financial condition,” *Vaughan v. Vaughan,*213 N.C. 189, 193, 195 S.E. 351, 353.

The order of arrest must be struck. The cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Error and remanded.
#### RHODES v. BOARD OF EDUCATION

No. 468P82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 130.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 21 September 1982. Appeal dismissed 21 September 1982.
#### PRINTERY, INC. v. SCHINHAN

No. 43.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 637.

Appeal by defendant dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question 7 March 1978.
#### LENZ v. RIDGEWOOD ASSOCIATES

No. 35 P 82.

Case below: 55 N.C. App. 115.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 March 1982.