alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6096

BRUCE W. KOENIG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.; COLIN OTTEY; AVA JOUBERT-CURTIS; 

GREG FLURY; UNKNOWN TRIAGE NURSES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. 

(1:13-cv-03599-JFM)

Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015

Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce W. Koenig, Appellant Pro Se. Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS, 

RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bruce W. Koenig appeals the district court’s order denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Koenig v. Wexford 

Health Sources, Inc., No. 1:13-cv-03599-JFM (D. Md. Dec. 30, 2014). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
               
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         3,712,583
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15,574,172
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    16,527,739
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               36,769,614
<PP&E>                                         13,798,927
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 53,932,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,622,668
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,410
<COMMON>                                       121,110
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   53,932,672
<SALES>                                        40,091,929
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  22,649,059
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               10,919,107
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             206,676
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,317,087
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,294,088
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,022,999
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,022,999
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .31
        


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 10-9 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 10-9 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 10-9 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 10-9 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 10-9 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 10-9 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 10-9 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 7 of 7
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Form 10-Q
of The Lamson & Sessions Co. (the "Company") for the period ended July 2, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on July 27,
2005 (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies that, to
such officer's knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
            Report.

      A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and shall not be deemed to be a part of the Report or "filed" for any
purpose whatsoever.

July 27, 2005

                                     /s/ James J. Abel
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    James J. Abel
                                    Executive Vice President, Secretary,
                                    Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Principal Financial Officer)
#### COSTIN v. SHELL

No. 329 PC.

Case below: 53 N.C. App. 117.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 October 1981.
#### IN RE WILL OF ROSE

No. 59 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 38.

Petition by First Baptist Church of Arlington for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 April 1976.
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 8 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 8 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
Reduzca su exposición al polvo

Quítele el polvo a la ropa de trabajo

¿Sabía usted?

Si usa las tecnologías de limpieza de ropa a 

lo largo del día laboral, puede reducir su 

exposición al polvo respirable en hasta un 88%

Lave su ropa después de su turno laboral, 

incluidas las sudaderas y chaquetas, y use 

guantes de cuero o piel (no de tela) para evitar 

la acumulación de polvo

Los hallazgos se basan en estudios de campo de NIOSH

Para obtener más información, visite go.usa.gov/xRkXu
#### STATE v. YOUNG

No. 71 PC

Case below: 48 NC App 743

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 December 1980.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly  unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, MIDARP Review.                     

*Date:*                         November 14, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mark Swieter, PhD, Chief, Training and Special Projects Review Branch, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Suite 220, Bethesda, MD 20892-8401, (301) 435-1389,                         *ms80x@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 27, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-4931 Filed 10-03-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-03525-PKL Document 2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:

/s/ John B. Gerlach, Jr.John B. Gerlach, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 11, 2008By:
    /s/ John L. BoylanJohn L. BoylanChief Financial OfficerFebruary 11, 2008 28
Release of Guarantee of Warner Chilcott Limited, dated August 20, 2009



 Exhibit 4.6 
 RELEASE OF GUARANTEE OF WARNER CHILCOTT LIMITED 
 1. Reference is hereby made to the Indenture, dated
as of January 18, 2005 (as amended, supplemented, waived or otherwise modified, the “Indenture”), by and between Warner Chilcott Corporation, the Guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee.
Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Indenture. 
 2. Pursuant to
Section 11.05(a)(1)(f), of the Indenture, Warner Chilcott Limited shall be released from its Guarantee under the Indenture if it requests such release at any time. 
 3. Warner Chilcott Limited hereby requests to be released from its Guarantee under the Indenture. 
 4. The
Issuer has delivered an Officers’ Certificate and an Opinion of Counsel to the Trustee certifying (a) compliance with Section 9.01, Section 11.05 and Section 12.04 of the Indenture and (b) that all conditions precedent
provided for in the Indenture to be performed or effected by the Issuer relating to the release of Warner Chilcott Limited from its Guarantee have been complied with. 
 5. The Trustee hereby acknowledges the termination and release of Warner Chilcott Limited from its Guarantee. 
 6. The parties hereto may sign one or more copies of this Release of Guarantee in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, but all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. 
 7. This Release of Guarantee is dated as of the date set forth below, and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
New York. 








					
	WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee
		
	 By:
	 	/s/ Martin Reed
		 	Name:	 	Martin Reed
		 	Title:	 	Vice President










			
	WARNER CHILCOTT LIMITED
		
	 By:
	 	/s/ Roger Boissonneault
	Name:	 	Roger Boissonneault
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer and President










			
	WARNER CHILCOTT CORPORATION
		
	 By:
	 	/s/ Roger Boissonneault
	Name:	 	Roger Boissonneault
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer


 Dated: August 20, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

Notice is hereby given that the Order revoking the following license is being rescinded by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to sections 14 and 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.

*License Number:*                     018410NF.                

*Name:*                     Onebin.Com, Inc.                

*Address:*                     3406 SE 26 Terrace, Unit C-10, Lauderdale, FL 33312.                

*Order Published:*                     FR: 09/28/05 (Volume 70, No. 187, Pg. 56691).                

Sandra L. Kusumoto,

Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.

[FR Doc. 05-23471 Filed 11-29-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSE OLIVO-NOBLE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 713 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-02-2000
<CASH>                                           8,543
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,443
<ALLOWANCES>                                       117
<INVENTORY>                                      8,146
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,873
<PP&E>                                          21,417
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,138
<BONDS>                                          4,413
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,713
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,599
<SALES>                                         21,302
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,302
<CGS>                                           16,534
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,534
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,368
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    12
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    635
<INCOME-TAX>                                       197
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                438
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       438
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11


</TABLE>
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2052 

To authorize the honorary promotion of Colonel Charles E. McGee to 

brigadier general in the United States Air Force. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 28 (legislative day, JUNE 27), 2019 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the honorary promotion of Colonel Charles E. 

McGee to brigadier general in the United States Air Force. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR HONORARY PROMOTION OF 

4 COLONEL CHARLES E. MCGEE TO BRIGADIER 

5 GENERAL IN THE UNITED STATES AIR 

6 FORCE. 

7 The President is authorized to issue an appropriate 

8 honorary commission promoting to brigadier general in 

9 the Air Force Colonel Charles E. McGee, United States 

10 Air Force (retired), a distinguished Tuskegee Airman 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2052 IS

1 whose honorary promotion to that grade has the rec2 ommendation of the Secretary of the Air Force in accord3 ance with the provisions of section 1563 of title 10, United 

4 States Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
October 13, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EX PARTE ALICIA BRUMANT

NO. 14-15-00337-CR

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 6 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 6 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 6 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 3 of 3
DWAYNE A. DEBOSE

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 2748

_______ ______________________/

Opinion filed November 13, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

.

Dwayne A. Debose, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURI AM.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
Case 1:07-cv-03429-DCF Document 14 Filed 02/11/2008 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH (B) ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,154
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,063
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    184,271
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           6,350
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,167
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 278,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        176,630
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           104
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   278,483
<SALES>                                        439,981
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               439,981
<CGS>                                          370,376
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  370,376
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,955
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,153
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,497
<INCOME-TAX>                                       220
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,277
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  4,200
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,477
<EPS-BASIC>                                     4.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.55


</TABLE>
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except underthe limited circumstancessetforth inLocalRule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50166

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KEITH VERNON HOSTER,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(W-91-CR-168-1)

September 23, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOLLY and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Keith Vernon Hoster appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to

vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and the
1

Jones v. Estelle, 693 F.2d 547 (5th Cir. 1982) (case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

because habeas petitioner failed to file notice of appeal until 13 months after entry of

judgment), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1072 (1983).

2

116 S.Ct. 2135 (1996) (a forfeiture under 21 U.S.C. § 881 is civil in nature and is an in

rem proceeding).

2

subsequent denial of his “Supplemental Addendum to Movant’s 2255 Motion.”

This court lacks jurisdiction to consider Hoster’s appeal from the denial of

hissection 2255 motion because the notice of appeal is untimely, and Hoster failed

to file an appropriate motion under Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(6).1 Accordingly, that

portion of the appeal is DISMISSED.

Assuming without deciding that the district court had jurisdiction over the

“Supplemental Addendum,” we conclude that the district court did not err in

rejecting same. Hoster’s contention that the administrative forfeiture violated the

double jeopardy clause is foreclosed by the recent opinion of the Supreme Court

in United States v. Ursery.

2

 An in rem civil forfeiture was held to be neither

punishment nor criminal for purposes of the double jeopardy clause. The appeal

from the district court’s denial of Hoster’s “Supplemental Addendum” istherefore

AFFIRMED.

Hoster’s motion for leave to file a reply brief out-of-time is DENIED.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.
#### STATE v. STINSON

No. 22 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 313.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 March 1979.