alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM KNICKERBOCKER VILLAGE INC. AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          59,695
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  446,318
<ALLOWANCES>                                   265,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,655,157
<PP&E>                                       7,422,063
<DEPRECIATION>                                 122,635
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,107,662
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,781,142
<BONDS>                                      6,216,639
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          317,048
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     948,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,107,662
<SALES>                                      2,401,871
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,404,384
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,378,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             145,465
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,747
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,747
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,747
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

______________________________________

GUY CARPENTER & COMPANY, LLC and 

MARSH & McLENNAN COMPANIES, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JULIAN SAMENGO-TURNER, RON 

WHYTE, and MARCUS HOPKINS,

Defendants.

______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 07 – CV- 3580 (DC)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

(ECF Case)

I, Mark A. Saloman, hereby certify that on the below date, I caused true and correct 

copies of Defendant’s Order to Show Cause, pursuant to Local Rule 6.3 and Rules 26(c) and 

54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and memorandum of law and declaration with 

annexed exhibits submitted in support thereof, to be served by e-mail and overnight delivery, as 

well as by electronic filing in accordance with the Southern District’s Local Civil Rules, and/or 

the Southern District’s Procedures for Electronic Case Filing on the following parties:

Robert N. Holtzman, Esq.

KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP

1177 Avenue of the Americas

New York, New York 10036

Counsel for Plaintiff

Hon. Denise L. Cote U.S.D.J.

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York

U.S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street

New York, New York 10007-1312

(Two Courtesy Copies Via Hand Delivery)

Dated: June 6, 2007

 New York, New York 

__/s/ Mark A. Saloman_________

Mark A. Saloman (MS 5764)

Proskauer Rose LLP

Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 25 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 233 (Tuesday, December 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 72692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23617]



[[Page 72692]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board


Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from 
Covington & Burling on behalf of Union Pacific Corporation (WB468-7-11/
23/05), for permission to use certain data from the Board's Carload 
Waybill Samples. A copy of the request may be obtained from the Office 
of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics, 
Environmental Analysis, and Administration within 14 calendar days of 
the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are 
codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.
    Contact: Mac Frampton, (202) 565-1541.

Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-23617 Filed 12-5-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Lancer
Orthodontics, Inc.'s first quarter 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                         136,358
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,460,496
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (157,581)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,982,706
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,449,580
<PP&E>                                       2,406,129
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,298,352)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,781,266
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          810,013
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,815,074
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,843,821)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,781,266
<SALES>                                      1,331,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,331,099
<CGS>                                          925,582
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  925,582
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,207
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (102,781)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (102,781)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (102,781)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
Doc 

United States District Court

Southern District of New York

Office of the Clerk

U.S. Courthouse

500 Pearl Street, New York, N.Y. 10007-1213

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X

 

NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

 

Akerman

 v. Collins & Aikman Corp.

 05cv5098

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X 

 

Pursuant to the memorandum of the Case Processing Assistant, the aboveentitled action is reassigned to the calendar of

 JUDGE Mukasey

 

All future documents submitted in this action are to be presented in the

Clerk=s Office of the Southern District Court for filing and shall bear the assigned

judge=s initials after the case number.

The attorney(s) for the plaintiff(s) are requested to serve a copy of the Notice

of Reassignment on all defendants.

J. Michael McMahon, CLERK

Dated: 

07/7/05

By: Jenny R. Horne

 Deputy Clerk 

 

 

 

cc: Attorneys of Record 

Case 1:05-cv-05098-MBM Document 6 Filed 07/07/2005 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15094-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
| /s/  David L.      Cheek                                           David      L. CheekPresident      and Chief Executive OfficerNovember      6, 2008 | /s/  Bert E.      Downing,      Jr.                                                                                         Bert      E. Downing, Jr.Vice      President, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate      Controller and TreasurerNovember      6, 2008 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Herman Lempp, Respondent, *v.*John R. Voorhis et al., Respondents, William N. George, Appellant, and Samuel J. Mitchell, as Sheriff of the County of Queens, Respondent.

*People ex rel. Lempp v. Voorhis,*185 App. Div.-, affirmed.

(Argued October 22, 1918;

decided October 24, 1918.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 18, 1918, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus directed to the defendants John R. Voorhis, Moses M. McKee, James Kane and Jacob Livingston, as and constituting the board of elections of the city of New York, requiring said board, in the preparation of the ballots, stationery and other paraphernalia to be used at the general election to be held within the county of Queens on November 5, 1918, to disregard the title of the office of sheriff and names of purported candidates for said office of sheriff, and to prepare said ballots, stationery and other paraphernalia in such manner that the title of the office of sheriff and the names of William N. George, Peter B. Campbell and Benjamin Katz, purported candidates to fill the said office, shall not appear thereon.

*Edgar Weaver*and *George H. Alexander*for appellant.

*William P. Burr, Corporation Counsel {William B. Cars-well*of counsel), for John R. Voorhis et al., respondents.

*John B. Merrill*for relator, respondent.

*Philip Frank*for Samuel J. Mitchell, respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan and McLaughlin, JJ. Absent: Crane, J.
#### ROOFING CO. v. DEPT. OF REVENUE

No. 283 PC.

Case below: 42 N.C. App. 248.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 September 1979.
Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE Document 7 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
No. 1273, Misc.

#### Brabson *v.*New York.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Order entered January 19, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 01277
- CV HAROLD HASWELL, Appellant

V. CACH, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at La w No. 4

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 004
- 01615
- 2016



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s January 17, 2017 motion to extend time to file appellant’s brief. Appellant’s motion does not comply with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.5, 10.1. However , to expedite the decision in this case, we suspend the rules governing requirements for motions and GRANT appellant’s motion

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 2. We ORDER the brief received on January 17, 2017 filed as of the date of t his order.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-26 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-26 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-26 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ali Jenab,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of VA
Software  Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 27, 2002 fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that  information  contained  in such Annual  Report on
Form 10-K fairly presents in all material  respects the financial  condition and
results of operations of VA Software Corporation.


                                            By: /s/ ALI JENAB
                                                --------------------------------
                                          Name: Ali Jenab
                                         Title: Chief Executive Officer

                                       70
Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-25      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 1 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-25      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 2 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-25      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 3 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-25      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 4 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-25      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 5 of 5
----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  July      28, 2008 |               /s/      Ronald J.      Kanterman                       Ronald      J. KantermanVice      President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal      Financial Officer)  |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
FALL PROTECTION: As Simple as A-B-C

On average annually, MSHA issued 111 fall-related imminent danger

orders for using the personal fall arrest system incorrectly or not at all.*

* Reported data based on an analysis of 1,057 imminent danger orders issued by MSHA between 

2010 and 2017. Recommendations are based on OSHA 29 CFR 1910.140, Personal fall protection systems.

A ANCHOR

Ensure that the tie-off point, consisting 

of either an anchorage and anchorage 

connector or a life line, is directly 

overhead.

B BODY 

HARNESS

Be certain to use a full body harness 

that is sized to fit your height and 

weight, with a D-ring on the back 

to attach the lanyard snap-hook. The 

correct fit adjustments of the straps 

around the thighs, pelvis, waist, and 

shoulders are critical to the

performance of the system. 

C CONNECTING 

DEVICE

Select the appropriate connecting device 

between the anchorage connector or life 

line and the D-ring of the full body harness 

that best suits the conditions of the work 

environment. Consider the fall distance 

and the work activity to be performed 

when making the selection. 

! Ensure that the anchorage point is rated for 5,000 pounds for each person attached and that all necessary safety fall

prevention training is up to date.

To learn more, visit cdc.gov/niosh/mining Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health

Disclaimer: Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. April 2020
## IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________



### m 02-30338

_______________



### S YLVESTER 

### B LAZE 

### , Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS



### U NITED 

### S TATES 

### P OSTAL 

### S ERVICE

AND 

### J OHN 

### E. P OTTER 

### , Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana ( 

### m 00-CV-2165)

_________________________ August 28, 2002

Before H IGGINBOTHAM , S MITH , and C LEMENT , Circuit Judges.

P ER C URIAM : *

Sylvester Bla ze appeals a summary judgmen t in this action claiming race discrimination. His brief is almost unintelligible, but he claims he was treated diffe r ently from white employees when h e was fired by the United States Postal Service after striking another employee. We affirm, essentially for the reasons given by the district court in its comprehensive Memorandum Ruling entered on February 28, 2002.

The judgment is AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is
not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-10 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-10 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### MOODY v. TOWN OF CARRBORO

No. 28

Reported: 301 NC 318

Petition by defendant to rehear denied 6 January 1981
B S

2

100 RMR

100 [Unal 1984] (4) L = 



 



  −



 





PRSUP Lb*Nb*C

14.5 * Sb * We

= (10a)

ERRATA

Page 118, Table 3 should read:

Table 3.—Load carrying capacities for mine roof bolts

Roof Bolt Material Minimum Yield

kN (lbs)

Minimum Ultimate Tensile,

kN (lbs)

A 5/8 Grade 55 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 (12,400) 85 (19,200)

B 5/8 Grade 75 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 (17,000) 101 (22,600)

C 3/4 Grade 75 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 (25,100) 149 (33,400)

D #6 Rebar Grade 40 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 (17,600) 137 (30,800)

E #6 Rebar Grade 60 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 (26,400) 176 (39,600)

F #7 Rebar Grade 40 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 (24,000) 187 (42,000)

G #7 Rebar Grade 60 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 (36,000) 240 (54,000)

H #5 Rebar Grade 60 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 (18,400) 124 (27,600)

Page 118, Equation (4) should read:

Page 126, Equation (10a) should read:
Case 1:07-cv-03579-LTS-MHD Document 20 Filed 11/01/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03579-LTS-MHD Document 20 Filed 11/01/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### POAG v. POWELL, COMR. OF MOTOR VEHICLES

No. 14 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 363.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 March 1979.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 135747 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 135747 COA: 272630 Wayne CC: 06-003041-01 CARLOS DURRELL SIMMONS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 11, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0421 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2008

Clerk
Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 15 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB     Document 5      Filed 09/19/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB     Document 5      Filed 09/19/2007     Page 2 of 2
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1454 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to add a representative 

of the Department of Homeland Security from the Cybersecurity and 

Infrastructure Security Agency on the Technical Guidelines Development 

Committee. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2019 

Mr. PETERS (for himself, Mr. LANKFORD, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, and Mr. JOHNSON) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to add a 

representative of the Department of Homeland Security 

from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security 

Agency on the Technical Guidelines Development Committee. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Voting System Cyber5 security Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1454 IS

1 SEC. 2. ADDITION OF REPRESENTATIVE OF DEPARTMENT 

2 OF HOMELAND SECURITY FROM CYBERSECU3 RITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY 

4 AGENCY ON TECHNICAL GUIDELINES DEVEL5 OPMENT COMMITTEE. 

6 Section 221(c)(1) of the Help America Vote Act of 

7 2002 (52 U.S.C. 20961(c)(1)) is amended— 

8 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), 

9 by striking ‘‘14’’ and inserting ‘‘15’’; 

10 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as sub11 paragraph (F); and 

12 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the fol13 lowing new subparagraph: 

14 ‘‘(E) A representative of the Department 

15 of Homeland Security from the Cybersecurity 

16 and Infrastructure Security Agency who has 

17 operational expertise in cybersecurity.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 12 Filed 05/15/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 12 Filed 05/15/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 12 Filed 05/15/2008 Page 3 of 3
#### STATE v. KING

No. 60 PC.

Case below: 12 N.C. App. 568.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 14 December 1971.