alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas S. McHugh, Interim Chief Financial Officer, Interim
Treasurer, Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President of Finance and Corporate Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                                                                                                 
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 25, 2010 |  | /s/    Thomas S.
McHugh                                                                                                         
|                     |  | Thomas S. McHugh                                                                                                                
|                     |  | Interim Chief Financial Officer, Interim Treasurer, Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President of Finance and Corporate Controller
|                     |  | (Principal Financial Officer)                                                                                                   

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as our exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and shall not be deemed to be considered filed as part of the
Quarterly Report Form 10-Q.
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 2 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 3 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 4 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 5 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 6 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 7 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 8 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 9 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 10 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 11 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 12 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 13 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 14 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 15 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 16 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 17 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 18 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 19 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 20 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-23 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 21 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 2 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 3 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 4 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 5 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 6 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 7 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 8 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 9 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 10 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 11 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 12 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 13 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 14 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 15 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 16 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 17 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 18 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 19 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 20 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 21 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 22 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 23 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-3 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 24 of 24
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Tehama County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in Red Bluff, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Introductions, (2) Approval of Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) Discussion of the Modoc Speaker Last Meeting, (5) Subcommittee Reports, (6) Chairman's Perspective, (7) General Discussion, (8) County Update, (9) Next Agenda.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on December 8, 2005 from 9 a.m. and end at approximately 12 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Lincoln Street School, Conference Room A, 1135 Lincoln Street, Red Bluff, CA. Individuals wishing to speak or propose agenda items must send their names and proposals to Jim Giachino, DFO, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Bobbin Gaddini, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, P.O. Box 164, Elk Creek, CA 95939. (530) 968-5329; E-mail                         *ggaddini@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting. Public input sessions will be provided and individuals who made written requests by December 4, 2005 will have the opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.

Dated: November 28, 2005.

James F. Giachino,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 05-23704 Filed 12-6-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### STATE v. MOORE

No. 63 PC.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 679.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 24 September 1974.
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.3
 RECEIVABLES TRUSTEES OFFICERS CERTIFICATE
 GRACECHURCH RECEIVABLES TRUSTEE LIMITED
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
  1.
    
    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Director of the Receivables Trustee;2.
    
    I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate on behalf of the Receivables Trustee; and3.
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the Receivables Trustee has complied with all conditions and covenants under the
Relevant Documents for the issue of the Investor Certificate for the period between January 1, 2006 and
December 31, 2006.
  th
 Name: Jonathon William Albright  Title: Director
 - 31 -
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-50014

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LUIS MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ-LICEA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:14-CR-521-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Luis Miguel Rodriguez-Licea appeals his 70-month within-guidelinesrange sentence for illegal reentry into the United States following removal. 

Rodriguez-Licea argues that his sentence is substantively unreasonable 

because the sentence was greater than necessary to achieve the goals of 18 

U.S.C. § 3553(a). He asserts that a presumption of reasonableness should not 

be applied to his within-guidelines-range sentence because the Guideline on 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 10, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-50014 Document: 00513188204 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/10/2015
No. 15-50014

2

which it was based, U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, is not empirically based, but he 

acknowledges that this argument is foreclosed. He asserts that his guidelines 

range was greater than necessary because § 2L1.2 double counted his prior 

convictions and because his offense was a mere trespass. He maintains that 

the sentence failed to reflect his personal history and characteristics because 

he and his mother are both ill and because he wishes to return to Mexico where 

work opportunities are available to him.

A discretionary sentence imposed within the advisory guidelines range 

is presumptively reasonable. United States v. Campos-Maldonado, 531 F.3d 

337, 338 (5th Cir. 2008). As Rodriguez-Licea acknowledges, his assertion that 

we should not apply a presumption of reasonableness because § 2L1.2 is not 

empirically based is foreclosed. See United States v. Duarte, 569 F.3d 528, 529-

31 (5th Cir. 2009).

The district court weighed the sentencing factors, rejected RodriguezLicea’s personal arguments, and imposed a within-guidelines-range sentence 

based primarily on Rodriguez-Licea’s criminal history. The internationaltrespass and double-counting-of-prior-convictions arguments that RodriguezLicea raises have both been previously rejected. See Duarte, 569 F.3d at 529-

31; United States v. Aguirre-Villa, 460 F.3d 681, 683 (5th Cir. 2006). As 

Rodriguez-Licea was sentenced within the guidelines range, the sentence is 

entitled to a presumption of reasonableness, and Rodriguez-Licea has not 

shown sufficient reason for us to disturb that presumption. See United States 

v. Gomez-Herrera, 523 F.3d 554, 565-66 (5th Cir. 2008).

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-50014 Document: 00513188204 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/10/2015
Case 1:07-cv-03521-DAB Document 4 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03521-DAB Document 4 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03521-DAB Document 4 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03521-DAB Document 4 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03521-DAB Document 4 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03521-DAB Document 4 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03521-DAB Document 4 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03521-DAB Document 4 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03521-DAB Document 4 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03521-DAB Document 4 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03521-DAB Document 4 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 11 of 11
#### STATE v. RHODES

No. 22.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 247.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of a substantial constitutional question allowed 28 January 1972.
EXHIBIT 8.1 

Significant Subsidiaries of O2MICRO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 

O2Micro, Inc., a California corporation 

O2Micro Electronics, Inc., a Taiwan company 

O2MicroInternational Japan Limited, a Japanese company 

O2Micro PTE Limited-Singapore, a Singapore company 

Aotu Micro (Wuhan) Co., Ltd., a Chinesecompany 

O2Micro (Beijing) Co., Ltd., a Chinese company 

O2Micro (China) Co., Ltd., a Chinese company 

O2Micro (Chengdu) Co., Ltd., a Chinese company 

O2SecurityLimited, a Cayman Islands company 

International Asset Holding Company, a Cayman Islands company 

O2Security(Wuhan) Co., Ltd., a Chinese company
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2047 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2047

  To provide for a 2-week extension of the Medicaid community mental 
     health services demonstration program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 2019

   Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice, 
              considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for a 2-week extension of the Medicaid community mental 
     health services demonstration program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE MEDICAID COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 
              DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

    Section 223(d)(3) of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 
(42 U.S.C. 1396a note) is amended by striking ``June 30, 2019'' and 
inserting ``July 14, 2019''.

SEC. 2. MEDICAID IMPROVEMENT FUND.

    Section 1941(b)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396w-
1(b)(1)) is amended by striking ``$6,000,000'' and inserting 
``$1,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lincoln International
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



                                                   /s/ KENNETH S. BERRYMAN
                                                   __________________________
                                                   Name:  Kenneth S. Berryman
                                                   Title: Treasurer
                                                   Date:  July 21, 2004
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Recent News & Stories             
  -  News Releases             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

-  FIRST 
-   
-   
- 1 (current)
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
-   
-   
-  LAST
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-31163

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

DENAIR RILEY,

Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:11-CR-235-11

Before BARKSDALE, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Denair Riley pleaded guilty to conspiracy 

to distribute, and to possess with intent to distribute, 280 grams or more of 

cocaine base, and 500 grams or more of cocaine hydrochloride, in violation of 

21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A) and (B), and 846; and use of a communication 

facility (telephone) to facilitate that crime, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b). 

The plea agreement contained, inter alia, a provision that, if Riley cooperated 

 

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. 

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 7, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-31163 Document: 00513456412 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/07/2016
No. 14-31163

2

and provided “substantial assistance”, the Government could, “in its 

discretion”, move for a sentence reduction. 

At sentencing, the Government declined to exercise that discretion, 

citing Riley’s lack of cooperation. The court sentenced him to the statutory 

mandatory minimum of 240 months’ imprisonment. In challenging that 

sentence, Riley does not contend his plea agreement was unknowing or 

involuntary. Instead, he asserts only that the Government breached the 

agreement by failing, based on his substantial assistance, to move for a 

downward departure. He acknowledges, however, that the Government 

retained discretion to move for such a departure.

A court cannot grant a downward departure for substantial assistance 

unless the Government so moves. E.g., United States v. Krumnow, 476 F.3d 

294, 297 (5th Cir. 2007). “The refusal to move for downward departure is 

reviewable only for unconstitutional motivation when [the Government’s] sole 

discretion is retained.” United States v. Aderholt, 87 F.3d 740, 743 (5th Cir. 

1996). Riley fails to claim an unconstitutional motivation, asserting only that 

his refusal to cooperate was because he feared for his safety. 

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 14-31163 Document: 00513456412 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/07/2016
#### STATE v. McDONALD

No. 97 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 457.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 April 1977.