alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                  ------------



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Marc S. Hermelin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.




Date: June 25, 2008                               /s/ Marc S. Hermelin
                                          -------------------------------------
                                                    Marc S. Hermelin
                                          Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)
Dismiss; Opinion Filed September 17, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 20
- 00737
- CV J. CHRISTIAN CATHER, M.D. AND J. CHRISTIAN CATHER, M.D., PLLC , Appellants V. MADELYN DEAN , Appellee On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 20
- 06165 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Whitehill, Molberg, and Nowell

Opinion by Justice Nowell Before the Court is appellants’ motion for extension of time to file a petition for permissive appeal. See T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. & R EM
. C ODE A NN
. § 51.014(d) (authorizing trial court to permit interlocutory appeal from otherwise unappealable interlocutory order under certain circumstances), (f) (requiring party seeking to appeal to petition appellate court for permission); T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 28.3 (governing procedure for filing petition for permissive appeal). Appellants assert the extension is necessary because t he order to be appealed does not fully comply with the– 2

–

requirements of Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 168, which sets forth the process for initiating a permissive appeal. Under Rule 168, a trial court may permit an appeal from an otherwise unappealable interlocutory order. T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 168. To do so, the trial court must sign a written order stating, in relevant part, its permission to appeal. See id. The date the order stating the court’s permission is signed triggers the deadline for filing
the petition for permissive appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 28.3(c). Without a written order stating the trial court’s permission, no basis for filing a petition for permissive appeal exists. See Hebert v. JJT Constr. , 438 S.W.3d 139, 142 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14 th Dist.] 2014, no pet.). The clerk’s record that has been filed includes the order to be appealed as well as an amended order. Neither order includes a statement of permission. Accordingly, no basis for filing a petition for permissive appeal exists, a nd the motion for extension of time is premature. See id. We dismiss the motion and appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a).

200737 F

. P 05 /Erin A. Nowell/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE– 3

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT
J. CHRISTIAN CATHER, M.D. AND J. CHRISTIAN CATHER, M.D., PLLC, Appellants
No. 05

- 20

- 00737

- CV V. MADELYN DEAN, Appellee On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 20

- 06165. Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell, Justices Whitehill and Molberg participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
We ORDER that appellee Madelyn Dean recover her costs, if any, of this appeal from appellants J. Christian Cather, M.D. and J. Christian Cather, M.D., PLLC.
Judgment entered th is 17th day of September , 2020.
Debt Settlement Agreement



Between



San Antonios Resources Inc.



And



[name]





Whereas San Antonios Resources Inc. (Company) acknowledges that it is indebted to [name]  in the amount of  {US$xx] by virtue of the fact that [name] settled outstanding trade accounts of that amount owed by the company, the Company agrees to issue [number] of common shares to [name] to settle the debt.. The closing of the shares for debt settlement will take place at the election of the Company any time on or before [date] and such closing will be marked by the issuance of Treasury shares.





Agreed to on this 27th day of August, 2002 by:











_/s/ Antonios Kripotos___________________

Antonios Kripotos for

SAN ANTONIOS RESOURCES INC.













/s/ signature____________________________

[name]
#### George Henderson, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Louisa Greer *et al.,*defendants in error.

Practice Supreme Court. Equity from Terrell county.

Wright & Warren; C. B. Wooten; W. A. Hawkins, for plaintiff in error.

H. Morgan; A. Hood, for defendant.

Greer, one of the defendants in error, died after the bill of exceptions was sued out. His estate was unrepresented when the cause was called here, on the 8th of August, 1871. The Court granted an order that plaintiff in error, at the next term, might open the record and proceed to a trial, and ordered that said order be published sixty days before said next term. On July 26th, 1872, it was dismissed, and the judgment affirmed, because plaintiff in error had taken “no legal steps” to have Greer’s representative made a party defendant *ad interim.*He had failed to have said order of 1871 published, as required. 21st February, 1872.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

EUGENE D. JOHNSON,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent.

______________________ 

2014-3104

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. DC-3443-14-0150-I-1.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

The Department of Health and Human Services

(“HHS”) moves to reform the caption to designate the 

Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) as the respondent in this petition. HHS also moves for a 21-day extension of time for the Board to file its response to 

petitioner’s informal brief. 

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board’s decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The 

Case: 14-3104 Document: 12 Page: 1 Filed: 07/18/2014
2 JOHNSON v. MSPB

employing agency is designated as the respondent when 

the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. 

Here, the Board dismissed petitioner’s appeal for failure 

to make nonfrivolous allegations of Board jurisdiction. 

Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition 

for review.

Accordingly,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. 

(2) The Board’s informal response brief is due within 

21 days from the date of this order. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s26

Case: 14-3104 Document: 12 Page: 2 Filed: 07/18/2014
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB     Document 17      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 1 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB     Document 17      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 2 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB     Document 17      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 3 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB     Document 17      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 4 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB     Document 17      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 5 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB     Document 17      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 6 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB     Document 17      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 7 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB     Document 17      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 8 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB     Document 17      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 9 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB     Document 17      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 10 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB     Document 17      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 11 of 11
Presidential Documents

58467 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 198 

Monday, October 15, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8189 of October 10, 2007 

General Pulaski Memorial Day, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

More than two hundred years after the death of General Casimir Pulaski, 

we honor the life and legacy of a Polish patriot and American Revolutionary 

War soldier who made the ultimate sacrifice for freedom. 

Casimir Pulaski first demonstrated his devotion to the cause of liberty while 

defending his native Poland and earned a reputation for courage and resolve. 

He later met Benjamin Franklin in Paris and learned of America’s struggle 

for independence. Inspired by freedom’s call, Pulaski joined General George 

Washington in the American Revolution in 1777 and was soon commissioned 

as a Brigadier General. General Pulaski recruited and trained a special corps 

of American, Polish, Irish, French, and German troops, and he became 

known as ‘‘the Father of the American Cavalry.’’ Although he was mortally 

wounded at the siege of Savannah in 1779, his legacy lives on. 

As we celebrate General Pulaski Memorial Day, we honor a son of Poland 

who stood with our country at the dawn of our independence. Casimir 

Pulaski’s determined efforts in Poland and America remind us of the great 

contributions Polish Americans have made to our country. Today, we recognize the enduring bond between the Polish and American people, and we 

are grateful for Poland’s efforts in support of freedom and democracy in 

Afghanistan and Iraq and in the global war on terror. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 11, 2007, as 

General Pulaski Memorial Day. I urge Americans to commemorate this occasion with appropriate activities and ceremonies honoring General Casimir 

Pulaski and all those who defend our freedom. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES5
58468 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 198 / Monday, October 15, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this tenth day of 

October, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07–5108 

Filed 10–12–07; 8:53 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES5GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK \ 

, .I 

, , . , . . . --- ........................................................................ X : .. . .; :. .. .-. 

. I , 

..\ ,, . ,. . .,, .; ;..*. , -'-"? ----. " 

,. . , ,- .'. I.. .__ - , 

' ~-. ...>- .. . _>.% . 1 .- , 

NURIDEEN ISLAM, I . ._( . , .,. d 

. 8' . . . ! , ,- --- . 

Plaintiff, 

-against- ORDER 

FISHER, et a.l., 

Defendant. 

DEBRA FREEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge: 

It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant are directed to appear for 

an in-person status conference before the Court on August 20,2008, at 10:30 a.m. The 

conference will take place at the United States Courthouse. 500 Pearl Street, New York, New 

York. 10007, in Courtoom 17A. 

Dated: New York, New York 

June 30,2008 

SO ORDERED 

/- li[&f - ,,a,w 

DEBRA FREEMAN 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Copies to: 

Mr. Nurideen Islam 

C/O Ms. Jamie Bowens (Mother) 

875 Pennsylvania Avenue 

Brooklyn, NY 1 1207 

Jeb Harben, Esq. 

Assistant Attorney General 

100 Church Street 

New York, NY 10007 

Case 1:07-cv-03225-PKC-DCF Document 39 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Decorize, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended August 4, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), Alex Budzinsky., Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

       (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Alex Budzinsky
------------------------
Alex Budzinsky
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
September 30, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS REPORT ON FORM
10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          63,717
<SECURITIES>                                     3,421
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                              97
<DEPRECIATION>                                      59
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,085
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            45
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,044
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,654
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,693
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,565
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,995
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,194
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,801
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,801
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     8.64
        

</TABLE>
SCWC-17-0000206

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

JIHYUN SIM, Individually, and as Court-Appointed Personal 

Representative for the Estate of Her Sister JISU SIM, SANG KI 

SHIM, father of JISU SIM, and TIA SUK KIM, mother of JISU SIM, 

Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants,

vs.

KONA ISLANDER INN, ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF

KONA ISLANDER INN, KONA ISLANDER INN HOTEL, HAWAIIANA MANAGEMENT 

COMPANY LTD., ICHTHUS LAND COMPANY, CHRISTIAN VAN DYCK, 

Individually, as a member of the Association of Apartment

Owners of Kona Islander Inn, and owner of Rainbow

Plantation Bed & Breakfast,

Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-17-0000206; CIV. NO. 15-1-252K)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Application for Writ 

of Certiorari, filed on December 28, 2020, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, February 18, 2021.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-17-0000206

18-FEB-2021

08:04 AM

Dkt. 17 ODAC
**** **Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Skye International, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald
      O. Abernathy, Chief Executive Officer
      and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




|                                |                                                                                   |                                                
|------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: April
            2, 2007 | By:                                                                               | /s/ Ronald
            O.
            Abernathy
|                                | Ronald
            O. Abernathy                                                  
|                                | Title Chief
            Executive Officer and Chief Financial
            Officer
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 13 of 13
#### POPE v. DEAL

No. 202 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 196.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 March 1979.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PENSACOLA MOTOR SALES,

a Florida corporation, d/b/a

BOB TYLER TOYOTA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:09cv571/RS-MD

EASTERN SHORE TOYOTA, LLC, an

Alabama Limited Liability Company;

DAPHNE AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, an

Alabama Limited Liability Company;

SHAWN ESFAHANI, Individually;

and DAPHNE ENTERPRISES, INC.,

an Alabama corporation,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER

The relief requested by Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion For Limited Appearance By

Gustavo Sardiño (Doc. 141) will be granted upon Mr. Sardiño’s filing the required petition

for admission, to be followed promptly by a certificate of good standing..

ORDERED on September 23, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### STATE v. BARKSDALE

No. 122 PC.

Case below: 16 N.C. App. 559.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 February 1973.
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 8 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03462-JFK Document 7 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03462-JFK Document 7 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ALBERT CROWDER, JR.

No. 26 PC

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

INASMUCH as defendant did not assign as error on appeal the failure of the trial judge to place the burden of proving the absence of heat of passion or the absence of self-defense on the state, *see State v. Crowder,*285 N.C. 42 (1974), he has waived his right now to complain about such errors. *Hankerson v. North Carolina,*---- U.S. ---, 53 L.Ed. 2d 306, 316, n. 8 (1977). Now, therefore, it is

ORDERED by the Court in Conference that defendant’s motion for reconsideration be and it is hereby denied.

This the 12th day of September, 1977.

James G. Exum, Jr. Associate Justice

For the Court