alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011010EN.01000301.xml

| 14.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/3

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 10/03

| Member State | Germany |
| --- | --- |
| Route | Hof/Plauen–Frankfurt am Main |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligation | 1.5.2011 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained | Bavarian Ministry of Economic Affairs, Infrastructure, Transport and Technology (Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wirtschaft, Infrastruktur, Verkehr und Technologie) |
| Prinzregentenstraße 28 |
| 80538 München |
| DEUTSCHLAND |
| Tel. +49 892162-2392 / 892162-2350 |
| Fax +49 892162-2588 |

Member State

Germany

Route

Hof/Plauen–Frankfurt am Main

Date of entry into force of the public service obligation

1.5.2011

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained

Bavarian Ministry of Economic Affairs, Infrastructure, Transport and Technology (Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wirtschaft, Infrastruktur, Verkehr und Technologie)

Prinzregentenstraße 28

80538 München

DEUTSCHLAND

Tel. +49 892162-2392 / 892162-2350

Fax +49 892162-2588

---
#### STATE v. MAVROGIANIS

No. 275P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 178.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 August 1982.
#### MARVIN McGAHA v. SMOKY MOUNTAIN STAGES, INC., and GORDON CLARK.

(Filed 24 February, 1965.)

Appeal by defendants from *Froneberger, J.,*October, 1964 Session, HeNdeRSON Superior Court.

The plaintiff in this case is the husband of the plaintiff in the companion case, No. 27 — Brenda McGaha against the same defendants. The two cases were tried together before the General County Court of Henderson County and resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff awarding him $1,500.00 for his personal injury and $350.00 for the damage to his Oldsmobile. The Superior Court on appeal affirmed the judgment. The defendants appealed to the Supreme Court.

*Redden, Redden ■& Redden by Arthur J. Redden, M. F. Toms for plaintiff appellee.*

*Whitmire •& Whitmire for defendant appellants.*

PeR Curiam.

The pleadings, the evidence, the findings of the General County Court of Henderson County, and the confirming order of the Superior Court are the same in this as in the companion case, *773Brenda McGaha against the same defendants, decided this day. That decision is controlling on this appeal. On its authority the order of the Superior Court affirming the judgment of the General County Court is reversed. The cause will be remanded to the General County Court of Henderson County for a new trial.

Reversed.
#### RAILWAY CO. v. FIBRES, INC.

No. 268 PC.

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 694.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 25 September 1979.
#### STATE v. CUMMINGS

No. 61 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 742.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 November 1978.
**Exhibit 21**

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

**As of December 31, 2005**

Subsidiaries of Consolidated Container Company LLC: 

Consolidated Container Capital, Inc. (Delaware) 

Consolidated Container Company LP (Delaware) 

Plastic Containers LLC (Delaware) 

ReidPlastics Group LLC (Delaware) 

Subsidiaries of Consolidated Container Capital, Inc: 

None 

Subsidiaries of Consolidated Container Company LP:

STC Plastics, Inc. (California) 

Subsidiariesof Plastic Containers LLC: 

None. 

Subsidiaries of Reid Plastics Group LLC: 

Reid Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (Districto Federal de Mexico) 

Consolidated Plastics, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Cuautitlán Izcalli, State of Mexico) 

Reid Canada, Inc. (Ontario, Canada)
Case 1:07-cv-03542-LAK Document 8 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03542-LAK Document 8 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03542-LAK Document 8 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03542-LAK Document 8 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03542-LAK Document 8 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03542-LAK Document 8 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03542-LAK Document 8 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03542-LAK Document 8 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 8 of 8
Dismissed; Opinion Filed February 22, 2018.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-17-01185-CV

IN RE FITZROY ZIGGY WALKER, Appellant

On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-18466

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Fillmore, and Schenck

Opinion by Justice Lang

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated January 16, 2018, we notified 

appellant the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file a brief and an 

extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an 

extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, 

appellant has not filed a brief, filed an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court 

regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

171185F.P05

/Douglas S. Lang/

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN RE FITZROY ZIGGY WALKER, 

Appellant

No. 05-17-01185-CV 

On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-18466.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang. Justices 

Fillmore and Schenck participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

Judgment entered this 22nd day of February, 2018.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DENNIS HANNAH

No. 108A82

(Filed 13 July 1982)

APPEAL pursuant to 6.S. 7A-30(2) from a decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 55 N.C. App. 583, 286 S.E. 2d 363 (1982), which found no error in the entry of judgment by *Judge Robert M. Burroughs*at the 1 April 1981 Session of Superior Court, GASTON County, upon the defendant’s conviction for felonious larceny and felonious breaking or entering.

*Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General, by John R. B. Matthis, Special Deputy Attorney General and John F. Maddrey, Associate Attorney, for the State.*

*Malcolm R. Hunter, Assistant Appellate Defender, for the defendant-appellant.*

PER CURIAM.

The sole issue presented to this Court is whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of misdemeanor breaking or entering. The Court of Appeals found no error in the trial. Having carefully reviewed the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals, the dissent, the briefs and authorities on this issue, we conclude that the result reached and the legal principles applied by the Court of Appeals are correct. Consequently, the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals is

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7147

DONNELL M. DYER-EL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; MARK J. BOLSTER, Acting Warden; 

FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, Medium, Petersburg, VA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:19-cv-00365-JAG-RCY)

Submitted: December 17, 2020 Decided: December 22, 2020

Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donnell M. Dyer-El, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Donnell M. Dyer-El, a District of Columbia Code offender, incarcerated at FCI 

Petersburg, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability.*

 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue 

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 

(2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 

134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dyer-El has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

* Because Dyer-El was convicted in a District of Columbia court, he is required to 

obtain a certificate of appealability in order to appeal the denial of his § 2241 petition. See 

Madley v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 278 F.3d 1306, 1310 (D.C. Cir. 2002).
#### HARRINGTON v. HARRINGTON

No. 49 PC.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 419.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 24 September 1974.
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-24 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-24 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-24 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           27291
<SECURITIES>                                     13637
<RECEIVABLES>                                    49901
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      27369
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                122067
<PP&E>                                           76767
<DEPRECIATION>                                   33812
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  180826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            40832
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         14042
<OTHER-SE>                                      113284
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    180826
<SALES>                                         171907
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                175632
<CGS>                                           118005
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   153758
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1565
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 513
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  19796
<INCOME-TAX>                                      5623
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              14173
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     14173
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10
        

</TABLE>
Case 7:07-cr-00374-CLB Document 32 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-4      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 1 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-4      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 2 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-4      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 3 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-4      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 4 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-4      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 5 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-4      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 6 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-4      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 7 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-4      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 8 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-4      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 9 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-4      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 10 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-4      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 11 of 12

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-4      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 12 of 12
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Annual Report of Abazias, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jesus
Diaz, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
       Company.


                /s/ Jesus Diaz
                ---------------------------
                Jesus Diaz
                CEO and CFO


March 27, 2006
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 19-7 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 19-7 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 19-7 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 19-7 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 19-7 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 19-7 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 19-7 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 19-7 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 8 of 8
#### STATE v. THORNTON

No. 150P82.

Case below: 55 N.C. App. 133.

Peittion by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 May 1982.
#### COBB v. COBB

No. 149 PC.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 230.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 12 January 1982. Motion of plaintiff to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 12 January 1982.
# U n i t e d S t a t e s C o u r t o f A pp e a l s For the Eig hth Circu it

_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
No . 1 9 -1 2 93

_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
M ark Dan i el Cro wl ey ,
l l ll l ll l l l l l l l ll l ll l l Pl a i n t i

f f - Ap p el l a n t ,

v

.

M aq ez D. Nai lo r, Serg ean t , Cu m m i n s Un it , ADC (Ori g i n al l y n am ed as Nai l o r); LaTo y a W o o d s , Co rp o ral , Cu m m i n s Un i t , ADC (Ori g i n al l y n am ed as W o o d s ); Ken n et h St ark s , Cap t ai n , Cu m m i n s Un i t , ADC (Ori g i n al l y n am ed as St ark ); W i l li am St rau g h n , W ard en , Cu m m i n s Un i t , ADC (Ori g i n al l y n am ed as St rau g h n ); Pat ri ck Pi erre, Serg ean t , Cu m m in s Un i t , ADC (Ori g i n al l y n am ed as Pi erre),

ll l l l l l l l l l ll l l l l l l l l Def

en da n t s - Ap p el l ees

.

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Ap p eal fro m

Un i t ed St at es Di s t ri ct Co u rt fo r t h e Eas tern Di s t ri ct o f Ark an s as - Pi n e Bl u ff

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Su b m i t t ed : Oct o b er 1 6 , 2 0 1 9 Fi l ed : No v em

b er 4 , 2 0 1 9 [Un pu b l is h ed ]

_ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ Befo re COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, an d ERICKSON, Ci rcu i t J u d ges

.

_ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _

PER CURIAM

.Ark an s as i n m at e Mark Cro wl ey ap peal s an o rd er an d ju d g m en t o f t h e d i s t ri ct

c o u r t 1 d i s m i s s i ng h i s act io n u n d er 4 2 U.S.C. § 19 8 3 fo r fai l ure t o ex h au s t ad m i n is t rat i v e rem ed ies

. W e ag ree t h at Cro wl ey fai led t o ex h au s t hi s cl ai m s b efo re b ri n g i n g s u i t as req ui red by 4 2 U.S.C. § 1 9 9 7 e(a). W h et her Cro w l e y’s g ri ev an ces

were d eem ed em erg e n t o r n on -em erg en t , th e p ri s o n ’ s p o l i cy al lo wed i n m at es to
ap p eal ev en i f t hey recei v ed n o res p o n s e t o th ei r g ri ev an ce s

. A s Cro w l ey d i d n ot
ap p eal aft er h i s g ri ev an ces wen t u n an s wered , an d h e was n o t p rev en ted fro m d o i n g

s o , h e d i d n o t ex h au s t th e p ro ces s

. S ee Po rt er , 7 8 1 F.3 d at 4 5 2

. Cro wl ey ’ s m i s t ak en b el i ef t h at an ap peal o f an u n an s wered g ri ev an ce co u l d b e su b m i t t e d o n l y on a g ri ev an ce d eci s i o n fo rm d i d n o t s h o w t h at t h e p ro ces s was u n av ai l ab l e t o h i m

. He

o ffered no ev i d en ce t o t h e d i s t ri ct co u rt t h at p ri s on o ffi ci al s p rev e n t e d h i m fro m ap p eal i n g

. See S

er g en t v. No r r i s , 3 3 0 F.3 d 10 8 4, 1 0 8 5-8 6 (8 t h Ci r. 2 0 0 3 ) ( p e r

cu r i a m ) ; Ch el et t e v. Ha r r i s , 2 2 9 F.3 d 6 8 4, 6 8 8 (8 t h Ci r. 2 0 0 0 ). Th e ju d g m en t i s affi rm ed

. S

ee 8 t h Ci r. R. 4 7B.

__ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _

1 Th e Ho n orab l e K

ri s t i n e G. Bak er, U n i t ed St at es D i s t ri ct J u d g e fo r t h e Eas t ern Di s t ri ct o f Ark an s as , ad o p t i n g t h e rep o rt an d reco m m en d ations of t h e Ho n orab l e Bet h Deere, Un i t ed St at es M ag i s trat e J u d g e fo r t he Eas t ern Di s t ri ct o f Ark an s as

. -2

-
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 1 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 2 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 3 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 4 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 5 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 6 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 7 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 8 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 9 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 10 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 11 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 12 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 13 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 14 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 15 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 16 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 17 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 18 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 19 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 20 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 21 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 22 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 23 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 24 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 25 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 26 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 27 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 28 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 29 of 30
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-2 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 30 of 30
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 8.1

          Significant Subsidiaries of O2 MICRO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

O//2//Micro, Inc., a California corporation

O//2//Micro Electronics, Inc., a Taiwan company

O//2//Micro International Japan Limited, a Japanese company

O//2//Micro PTE Limited-Singapore, a Singapore company

Aotu Micro (Wuhan) Co., Ltd., a Chinese company

O//2//Micro (Beijing) Co., Ltd., a Chinese company

O//2//Micro (China) Co., Ltd., a Chinese company

O//2//Micro (Chengdu) Co., Ltd., a Chinese company

OceanOne Semiconductor (Ningbo) Limited, a Chinese company

International Asset Holding Company, a Cayman Islands company