alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Furnished (but not filed) as an exhibit to the periodic report identified in the Certification.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Gentiva Health Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ronald A. Malone, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: March 13, 2008

/s/    Ronald A. MaloneRonald A. MaloneChairman and Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 13, 2017

a0110 

# Order

Clerk January 13, 2017

153661

DONALD J. RHODA Guardian/Conservator of

TREVOR RHODA, and TAMMIE WALKER,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 153661

COA: 321363

Marquette CC: 13

- 051044

- NI

PETER E. O’DOVERO, INC. d/b/a

MARQUETTE MOUNTAIN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 24, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

M ARKMAN , C.J. ( dissenting ).

I would grant leave to consider whether the Court of Appeals correctly interpreted

the Ski Area Safety Act, MCL 408.321 et seq . First, I would assess whether MCL

408.326a(d), which requires a ski operator to “ [m]ark the top of or entrance to each ski

run, slope, and trail which is closed to skiing with an appropria te symbol indicating that

the run, slope, or trail is closed, as prescribed by rules promulgated under [MCL

408.340(3)]” applies to the closing of only an individual feature along a run, slope, or

trail

— in this case a snowboarding rail. Second, I would as sess whether the correct legal

standard was applied in addressing whether the rail constituted a ski hazard that

“inhere[s] in the sport” and is thus “obvious and necessary” under MCL 408.342(2).

Compare Anderson v Pine Knob Ski Resort, Inc , 469 Mich 20 ( 2003).
#### STATE v. PEARSON

No. 88 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 83.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 December 1975.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TIMOTHY OLIVER BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 19

- 00074

- CR

Appeal from the

109th District Court

of Crane County, Texas

(TC# 1818)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2020.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and P alafox, JJ.
Case 1:05-cv-04950-MBM Document 8 Filed 10/24/2005 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:05-cv-04950-MBM Document 8 Filed 10/24/2005 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 2 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 2 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
Letter of Intent 

Between

CLEAN ENERGY & JIE LI

 

 

January 25, 2001

Mr. John P. Thuot, President

Clean Energy Combustion Systems Inc. ("Clean Energy")

7087 MacPherson Ave.

Burnaby, B.C.

Dear Sir:

RE: PULSE BLADE COMBUSTION PRODUCT/TECHNOLOGY

As outlined in our previous letter of intent dated for reference May 31, 2000, Clean Energy and Jie Li International Environmental Technologies Group Ltd. ("Jie Li") have agreed to undertake a marketing program for Clean Energy's high-frequency pulseblade coal-burning combustion units ("burners") in the People's Republic of China ("PRC" or "China") under a licensing agreement.  In order to obtain that license, Jie Li has provided Clean Energy with assurances that they have sufficient contacts in theAsia Pacific region that will provide numerous potential channels through which Clean Energy products and/or technology may be distributed.  

After a number of contact meetings between Clean Energy, Jie Li and some of the many contacts available to us as potential customers for the technology in China, and having received expressions of interest and/or letters of intent from one or morepotential customers in the PRC, Jie Li is now able to provide Clean Energy with an initial Letter of Intent for purchase of burners:

Jie Li has secured a partner in China who has agreed to supply Jie Li and Clean Energy with an industrial test site (the "test site") at which to install and test Clean Energy's burners.
Jie Li wishes to secure Clean Energy's services in conducting this burner installation and test in the PRC.
The test site will involve the providing of two burner units and the retrofitting of one 10 tonne steam boiler.
Pending the successful installation of the PBC burners, and a period of testing and monitoring of emission levels and burning efficiencies, Jie Li intends to make burner purchases from Clean Energy and to provide retro-fitting services to itscustomers in the PRC.

 

 
Jie Li intends to make an initial purchase of sufficient burners to allow for the retrofitting of up to 500 boilers, such purchases to be scheduled as mutually agreed between the parties.  Payment for the burners shall be FOB Vancouver, B.C. ondelivery.  Price shall be mutually agreed upon at a later date, but shall be in the approximate range of US$20,000 per 12.5 million BTU burner, as previously agreed.

We trust this outlines the intent and agreement between Jie Li and Clean Energy.  We remind you that this letter of intent is issued for the express purpose of providing assurance to assist Clean Energy in its efforts to raise equity capital throughthe sale of Class "C" preference shares in a private placement.  Any use of the information provided in this letter for any other purpose is prohibited.

Yours very truly,

/s/  Michael C. Gau

Michael C. Gau, President

Jie Li International Environmental Technologies Group Ltd.
#### STATE v. FERGUSON

No. 24P83.

Case below: 59 N.C. App. 738.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 March 1983.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2036 

To amend the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to provide grants 

to States for summer employment programs for youth. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 27, 2019 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself and Mr. VAN HOLLEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act 

to provide grants to States for summer employment programs for youth. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Youth Summer Jobs 

5 and Public Service Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2036 IS

1 SEC. 2. GRANTS TO STATES FOR SUMMER EMPLOYMENT 

2 FOR YOUTH. 

3 Section 129 of the Workforce Innovation and Oppor4 tunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3164) is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘(d) GRANTS TO STATES FOR SUMMER EMPLOY7 MENT FOR YOUTH.— 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

9 provision of this Act, from the amount appropriated 

10 under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall award 

11 grants to States to provide assistance to local areas 

12 that have high concentrations of eligible youth to en13 able such local areas to carry out programs de14 scribed in subsection (c)(1) that provide summer 

15 employment opportunities for eligible youth, which 

16 are directly linked to academic and occupational 

17 learning, as described in subsection (c)(2)(C). In 

18 awarding grants under this subsection, a State 

19 shall— 

20 ‘‘(A) partner with private businesses to the 

21 extent feasible to provide employment opportu22 nities at such businesses; and 

23 ‘‘(B) prioritize jobs and work opportunities 

24 that directly serve the community. 

25 ‘‘(2) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

26 There is authorized to be appropriated 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 2036 IS

1 $100,000,000 to carry out this subsection for each 

2 of fiscal years 2020 through 2024.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### STATE v. CHURCH

No. 163 PC.

Case below: 55 N.C. App. 132.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 22 December 1981.
Case 1:06-cv-15133-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15133-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15133-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15133-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15133-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15133-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15133-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15133-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15133-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15133-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15133-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15133-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15133-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03445-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 1 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03445-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 2 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03445-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 3 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03445-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 4 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03445-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 5 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03445-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 6 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03445-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 7 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03445-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 8 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03445-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 9 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03445-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 10 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03445-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 11 of 11
**Exhibit 10.20**
**AMENDMENT TO SALE AND ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT**
              This Amendment to Sale and Assignment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is madeas of this 24th day of September, 2002, by and between Scott Goss, an individual,residing at 11414 Brook Run Drive, Germantown, MD 20876 (hereinafter referred to as “Owner”),and Veridian Corporation, its subsidiaries and affiliates, with a principalplace of business at 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, Virginia (collectivelythe “Purchaser”). Unless otherwise defined, capitalized terms used in thisAmendment shall have the meanings given to them in the Sale and AssignmentAgreement (the “Agreement”) by and between Owner and Purchaser dated as ofAugust 12, 2002.
              **WHEREAS**, the Owner are Purchaser are parties to the Agreement; and
              **WHEREAS**, the Owner and Purchaser desire to amend the Agreement as setforth herein;
              **NOW, THEREFORE**, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt andsufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
     1.     Section 2 of the Agreement is amended by adding the following sentencesto the end thereof:
     “Purchaser and Owner acknowledge and agree that Two Hundred ThousandDollars ($200,000) of each payment to be made by Purchaser to Owner on thefirst, second and third anniversaries of the Closing pursuant to Section 3.2shall be allocated as consideration for the covenants and agreements set forthin this Section 2, and the remainder shall be allocated as consideration forthe Business, including the Software. The parties further agree that suchallocation is fair and reasonable given the scope and duration of thelimitations set forth in this Section 2, and that, for purposes of any taxreturn, they will report all payments made or received hereunder consistentwith such allocation.”
     2.     Except as amended above, the Agreement remains in full force andeffect.
     3.     This Amendment may be signed in counterparts by telecopy.

 

     **IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the parties have executed and delivered this Amendmentas of the date above written.
**SCOTT GOSS****VERIDIAN CORPORATION**
/s/ ScottGoss                                   By /s/ James P.Allen
Exhibit
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  PURSUANT
TO
  18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Symyx Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, to which this Certification is
attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Report”), I, Rex S. Jackson, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, pursuant to Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
 
 
 By:
                /s/ Rex S. JacksonRex
      S. JacksonExecutive
      Vice President,Chief
      Financial OfficerMarch
      13, 2009
 
 
 This
certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of Symyx Technologies, Inc. under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed December 29, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1914

Lower Tribunal No. F16-11280A

________________

Mackenson Cherisme,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. Fernandez, Judge.

Mackenson Cherisme, in proper person. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, HENDON, and MILLER, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See State v. Gray, 633 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); 

Woods v. State, 314 So. 3d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 203 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 203

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
       railroad track maintenance credit, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2019

Mr. Crapo (for himself, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Thune, 
 Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Casey, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. 
 Moran, and Mr. Wicker) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
       railroad track maintenance credit, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Building Rail Access for Customers 
and the Economy Act of 2019'' or the ``BRACE Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. RAILROAD TRACK MAINTENANCE CREDIT MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 45G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by striking subsection (f).
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
        apply to expenditures paid or incurred during taxable years 
        beginning after December 31, 2017.
            (2) Safe harbor assignments.--Assignments, including 
        related expenditures paid or incurred, under paragraph (2) of 
        section 45G(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for taxable 
        years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, and before January 
        1, 2019, shall be treated as effective as of the close of such 
        taxable year if made pursuant to a written agreement entered 
        into not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of 
        this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### M A N D A T E

TO THE 332ND DISTRIC T COURT of HIDALGO COUNTY, GREE TINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 11th day of September, 2014 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Steven Patrick Jones , et al., Appellant s ,

v. Lydia Tummel, et al. Appellee s

. CAUSE NO. 13

- 14

- 00349

- CV (Tr.Ct.No. C

- 0034

- 13

- F)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consi dered this cause on

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION in accordance with its opinion . Costs of

the appeal are adjudged against appellant s

.

We further order this decision certif ied below for observance.

September 11, 2014.



WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof affixed , at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 30th day of December, 2014.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000059479
<NAME>                        Lilly Industries, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         7,484
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  94,220
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,960
<INVENTORY>                                    55,827
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,864
<PP&E>                                         112,643
<DEPRECIATION>                                 64,607
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 539,311
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,825
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       98,996
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     79,255
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   539,311
<SALES>                                        317,514
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               317,514
<CGS>                                          194,340
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  283,228
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               493
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8,012
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                25,781
<INCOME-TAX>                                   10,570
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   15,211
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .41



</TABLE>