alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 1 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 2 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 3 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 4 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 5 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 6 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 7 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 8 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 9 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 10 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 11 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 12 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 13 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 14 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 15 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 16 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 17 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 18 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 19 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 20 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 21 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 22 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 23 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 24 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 25 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 26 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 27 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 28 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 29 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 30 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 31 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 32 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 33 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 34 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 18 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 35 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 1 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 2 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 3 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 4 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 5 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 6 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 7 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 8 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 9 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 10 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 11 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 12 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 13 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 14 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 15 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 16 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 17 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 18 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 19 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 20 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 21 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 22 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 23 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 24 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 25 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 26 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 27 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 28 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20-4 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 29 of 29
Case 1:07-cr-00373-SHS Document 19 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 1 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00373-SHS Document 19 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 2 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00373-SHS Document 19 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 3 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00373-SHS Document 19 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 4 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00373-SHS Document 19 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 5 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00373-SHS Document 19 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 6 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03470-NRB Document 19 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7649

MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

CHRISTOPHER ZYCH, Warden, USP Lee,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:16-cv-00372-NKM-RSB)

Submitted: March 31, 2017 Decided: May 10, 2017

Before MOTZ, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael S. Gorbey, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael S. Gorbey, a District of Columbia Code offender incarcerated at USP 

Lee, seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2241 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012); see Madley v. U.S.

Parole Comm’n, 278 F.3d 1306, 1308-10 (D.C. Cir. 2002). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner 

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district 

court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When 

the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both 

that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gorbey has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Gorbey’s motion to amend his appeal 

to include a claim not presented below, deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 23.02 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-88208) pertaining to the ElantecSemiconductor, Inc. 1983 Stock Option Plan, Elantec Semiconductor, Inc. 1994 Equity Incentive Plan, Elantec Semiconductor, Inc. 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Elantec Semiconductor, Inc. 1995 Equity Incentive Plan and Elantec Semiconductor, Inc.2001 Equity Incentive Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-31094) pertaining to the Intersil Corporation 1999 Equity Compensation Plan and Intersil Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-50718) pertaining to the SiCOM, Inc. 1985 IncentiveStock Option Plan, SiCOM, Inc. 1996 Equity Incentive Plan and Option Issued to Robert W. Putnam, (Form S-8 No. 333-50722) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan of No Wires Needed B.V., (Form S-8 No. 333-65804) pertaining to the IntersilCorporation 1999 Equity Compensation Plan, (Form S-4 No. 333-35052) and (Form S-4 No. 333-46984) and the related Prospectuses of Intersil Corporation of our report dated January 28, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of Intersil Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended January 2, 2004. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 

June 21, 2004
Exhibit 4(b)(xxv)


 


Classification: Confidential


 


31 October 2019


 


Private & Confidential


Ms Catherine Woods


 


Dear Catherine,


 


Non-executive Director appointment
– Lloyds Banking Group plc


 


Further to my letter of 22 October, I
can now confirm that your appointment on the terms set out in that letter will commence on 1st March, 2020. I look forward
very much to having you with us.


 


Best regards


/s/ Norman Blackwell
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of One Voice Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Dean Weber, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


A signed original of this written statement required by section 9.06 has been
provided to One Voice and will be retained by One Voice and furnished to the
Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Dated: April 1, 2005

                                       /s/ Dean Weber
                                       -----------------------------
                                       Name: Dean Weber
                                       Title: President, Chief Executive Officer
                                              and Director
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C.  Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group; Function, Integration, and Rehabilitation Sciences Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         October 22, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Double Tree, 8120 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Anne Krey, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health, and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6908.                         *ak41o@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 20, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-4807 Filed 9-28-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Case 1:05-cv-04950-MBM Document 4-6 Filed 06/06/2005 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:05-cv-04950-MBM Document 4-6 Filed 06/06/2005 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:05-cv-04950-MBM Document 4-6 Filed 06/06/2005 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:05-cv-04950-MBM Document 4-6 Filed 06/06/2005 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:05-cv-04950-MBM Document 4-6 Filed 06/06/2005 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 31-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 31-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 31-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 31-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 31-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 31-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 31-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 31-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 31-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 9 of 9
#### CALDWELL v. ST. PAUL INSURANCE CO.

No. 128 PC.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 346.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 12 January 1982.
II 

Calendar No. 252 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2071 

[Report No. 116–132] 

To repeal certain obsolete laws relating to Indians. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 10, 2019 

Mr. ROUNDS (for himself, Ms. SINEMA, and Mr. LANKFORD) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

OCTOBER 22, 2019 

Reported by Mr. HOEVEN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To repeal certain obsolete laws relating to Indians. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Repealing Existing 

5 Substandard Provisions Encouraging Conciliation with 

6 Tribes Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2071 RS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CERTAIN OBSOLETE LAWS RELATING 

2 TO INDIANS. 

3 (1) Section 2080 of the Revised Statutes (25 

4 U.S.C. 72) is repealed. 

5 (2) Section 2100 of the Revised Statutes (25 

6 U.S.C. 127) is repealed. 

7 (3) Section 2 of the Act of March 3, 1875 (18 

8 Stat. 449, chapter 132; 25 U.S.C. 128), is repealed. 

9 (4) The first section of the Act of March 3, 

10 1875 (18 Stat. 424, chapter 132; 25 U.S.C. 129), 

11 is amended under the heading ‘‘CHEYENNES 

12 AND ARAPAHOES.’’ by striking ‘‘; that the Sec13 retary of the Interior be authorized to withhold, 

14 from any tribe of Indians who may hold any captives 

15 other than Indians, any moneys due them from the 

16 United States until said captives shall be surren17 dered to the lawful authorities of the United 

18 States’’. 

19 (5) Section 2087 of the Revised Statutes (25 

20 U.S.C. 130) is repealed. 

21 (6) Section 3 of the Act of March 3, 1875 (18 

22 Stat. 449, chapter 132; 25 U.S.C. 137), is repealed. 

23 (7) Section 2101 of the Revised Statutes (25 

24 U.S.C. 138) is repealed. 

25 (8) Section 7 of the Act of June 23, 1879 (21 

26 Stat. 35, chapter 35; 25 U.S.C. 273), is repealed. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2071 RS

1 (9) The first section of the Act of March 3, 

2 1893 (27 Stat. 612, chapter 209), is amended— 

3 (A) under the heading ‘‘MISCELLA4 NEOUS SUPPORTS.’’ (27 Stat. 628; 25 

5 U.S.C. 283), by striking the last 2 undesig6 nated paragraphs; and 

7 (B) under the heading ‘‘FOR SUPPORT 

8 OF SCHOOLS.’’ (27 Stat. 635; 25 U.S.C. 

9 283), by striking the second undesignated para10 graph. 

11 (10) Section 18 of the Act of June 30, 1913 

12 (38 Stat. 96, chapter 4; 25 U.S.C. 285), is amended 

13 by striking the tenth undesignated paragraph. 

14 (11) The Act of June 21, 1906 (34 Stat. 325, 

15 chapter 3504), is amended under the heading ‘‘COM16 MISSIONER.’’ under the heading ‘‘I. GENERAL 

17 PROVISIONS.’’ (34 Stat. 328; 25 U.S.C. 302) by 

18 striking the fourth undesignated paragraph. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 252 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2071 

[Report No. 116–132] 

A BILL 

To repeal certain obsolete laws relating to Indians. 

OCTOBER 22, 2019 

Reported without amendment 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 232 (Monday, December 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 72496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23632]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Public Notice for a Change in Use of Aeronautical Property at 
Pease International Tradeport, Portsmouth, NH

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is requesting public comment on the Pease Development 
Authority's request to sell a portion (11.57 acres) of Airport property 
from aeronautical use to non-aeronautical use. The property is located 
at 40 Oak Avenue, Portsmouth, New Hampshire and is currently used for 
revenue production. Upon disposition the property will be used for 
construction of a Federal building by the General Services 
Administration. The property was acquired under the Surplus Property 
Act under a Deed from the United States Air Force dated January 28, 
2004.
    The disposition of proceeds from the disposal of airport property 
will be in accordance with FAA's Policy and Procedures Concerning the 
Use of Airport Revenue, published in the Federal Register on February 
16, 1999.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 4, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review by appointment by 
contacting Ms. Lynn Hinchee, General Counsel, Pease Development 
Authority, at 360 Corporate Drive, Portsmouth, New Hampshire 03801, 
Telephone 603-766-9286 and by contacting Donna R. Witte, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 16 New England Executive Park, Burlington, 
Massachusetts, Telephone 781-238-7624.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna R. Witte at the Federal Aviation 
Administration, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, 
Massachusetts, Telephone 781-238-7624.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21) requires the 
FAA to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment to the 
``waiver'' or ``modification'' of a sponsor's Federal obligation to use 
certain airport property for aeronautical purposes.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on November 21, 2005.
LaVerne F. Reid,
Manager, Airports Division, New England Region.
[FR Doc. 05-23632 Filed 12-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16
- 7649

MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather

- Gorbey , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. CHRISTOPHER ZYCH, Warden, USP Lee , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Norman K. Moon , Senior District Judge. ( 7:16

- cv - 00372

- NKM

- RSB )

Submitted : March 31, 2017 Decided: May 10, 2017

Before MOTZ , FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Michael S. Gorbey , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael S. Gorbey , a District of Columbia Code offender incarcerated a t USP
Lee , seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012) ; s ee Madley v. U

. S

. Parole Comm’n , 278 F.3d 1306, 1308

- 10 (D.C. Cir. 2002). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court den ies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Mill er - El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the deni al of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gorbey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Gorbey’s motion to amend his appeal to include a claim not presented below, deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are a dequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Uso seguro de escaleras

En promedio, 172 mineros se lesionan

cada año cuando están usando escaleras.*

* Los datos se basan en un análisis de lesiones no mortales relacionadas con el uso de escaleras, notificadas a la Administración de Seguridad y Salud en

Minas (MSHA) entre el 2010 y el 2015. Las recomendaciones se basan en las normas CFR 30 56.11011, CFR 29 1926.1053 y ANSI ASC A14.3-2008.

Aproximadamente

19

días se pierden 

debido a 

lesiones

Use zapatos seguros

Use zapatos con tacones que tengan el borde de 

adelante definido.

Retire los contaminantes

Retire escombros, lodo, hielo o grasa que haya 

en la escalera y que tenga en los guantes y zapatos.

Inspeccione la escalera 

Antes de subirse, fíjese si tiene defectos, como partes rotas, 

sueltas o dobladas.

Úsela de frente

Use la escalera de frente al subir y bajar.

Suba y baje con cuidado

Nunca salte de una escalera ni suba más de un 

escalón a la vez.

Mantenga tres puntos de contacto

Cuando suba por la escalera no lleve nada 

en las manos. Use una mochila o una correa de hombro 

para las herramientas y los artículos personales.

Asegúrese de que la escalera tenga un 

ángulo seguro

Confirme que la escalera esté en un ángulo seguro 

para subir y bajar. Las ilustraciones son de NIOSH

Descargue la app de NIOSH "Uso seguro de escaleras", www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/falls/mobileapp.html, que incluye una 

herramienta para medir los ángulos, una lista de verificación para hacer inspecciones mecánicas y descripciones de accesorios 

para el uso seguro de escaleras.

Octubre del 2020

MLS - 323763

Descargo de responsabilidad: La mención de cualquier empresa o producto no constituye respaldo alguno del 

Instituto Nacional para la Seguridad y Salud Ocupacional de los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades.