alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13



Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of EPCOS AG, a Germany company (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



The amended Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended September 30,
2004 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: July
26, 2005



/s/ Gerhard PegamGerhard PegamChief Executive Officer




---

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of EPCOS AG, a Germany company (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



The amended Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Date: July 26, 2005



/s/ Wilfried BackesDr. Wilfried BackesChief Financial Officer
#### W. G. Forsyth, plaintiff in error, *vs.*The Mayor and Council of Atlanta, defendant in error.

(By two judges.) — A declaration by one against an incorporated city, alleging that said city had, by an ordinance, prohibited the erection of wooden buildings in certain parts of said city, and that the City Council had afterwards authorized B to build a wooden building within said limits, and that B’s building, taking fire, had caused a building belonging to the plaintiff to be burned, is demurrable. 12th March, 1872.

*153Municipal Corporations. Negligence. Tried before Judge Hopkins. Fulton Superior Court. April Term, 1871.

Forsyth averred that he owned certain wooden buildings, in the fire limits of Atlanta, a corporate city, and that its Mayor and Council were bound to protect them against fire ; that they had, at the time, an ordinance forbidding the building of any but fire-proof buildings within said specified limits, and forbidding blacksmith’s shops to be built within certain distances from other houses. And yet, while said ordinance was of force, they permitted one Finney, by his special request, to build a wooden shop, and keep a blacksmith’s shop in said fire limits, and within a shorter distance from Forsyth’s buildings than was allowable by said ordinance ; that Finney’s said buildings took fire, and were destroyed, and communicated fire to *Ms*buildings and contents, whereby *they*were destroyed. He prayed that defendant be compelled to pay his loss. Upon demurrer, the Court dismissed the cause. That is assigned as error.

J. T. Glenn, for plaintiff in error.

W. T. Newman, City Attorney, for defendant.

Defendant is public corporation: R. Code, section 1672. It is not liable for a tort: 2 Tenn. R., 671; 2 Hill (S. C.) R., 571. It could exercise its discretion as to fire limits: 1 Denio, N. Y. R., 595; 19 Ga. R., 490; 20th, 635; 5 Am. Law Reg., 53; Abbott’s Dig. L. of Corp., 487; 1 Hill’s R. (N. Y.), 562.

McCay, Judge.

Were this a case when, after an ordinance of a city was adopted and published, one had built in accordance therewith and, on the faith that no wooden buildings would be permitted to be put up within the fire limits, and after thus acting and thus building, the city should permit a wooden. *154building to be erected, by the building of which, plaintiff's house was burned, the argument made in the hearing might have some force. But, as the case is put in the declaration, the plaintiff's own house was a wooden one, and must have been built either before the ordinance was passed, or in violation of it, or by the same permission as is complained of. In either case the plaintiff has come to no harm from the city. He did not build on the faith of the ordinance. If a dangerous structure was put up near his he had his remedy against the builder of it, by injunction. The permission of the city did not and could not justify any private person to erect a nuisance, its permission is a mere waiver of its rights. Persons damaged had their remedy, either preventive by injunction or remedial by abatement.

Judgment affirmed.
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-19 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-19 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-19 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 3 of 3
UNL'I'LL) S'l'A'l'LS IIISTRICT COUK'I' 

SOUTHERN DISTRIC'S 01: NEW YORK 

IN RE: 

i hl:ZSTER FILE 

FOSAMAX PKOLl1!C'TS LIABILITY L,lTIGA'I'lON 

1 106-M 11- 1 789 (JFK) 

'177i.~ Llocuntent Keicrles To All Ac1ion.c 

ORDER FOR .4DhIISSION PRO HAG VICE 

Considering the Cerlijicate 01' Good Standing and ol l othcr docut~~cnts rcquired by Case 

Management Order No. 5 submitted by counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

..ll-'pl icant's Name: Kathlccn Sullivan Hardway UC-' r;srz,L *--I--- ---- 

Firm N;~mt.: Venable LLP 

Address: -1'tvo I Iopkins Plaza. Suite 1 800 

1 

CityIStatclZip: Haltimore. Maryland 2 1201 . w ,--- -- , ) 

3 -/y-u3 f 

_--..--....-- ii L-.- - .' "---"--urn"- 

-- .AIWI 

.I TelephoneTax: (4 1 0) 244-7400/(4 10) 244-7742 

Email Address: k shard~~-ay51::ve11able.com 

is acimilted to practice pro har \ icc as counsel lbr hIt.1-c.k & Co.. Iric. in the ahoi r. c:iptioned case 

in the I!nited Statcs I)isrric~ C'our~ fill- the Southern District of New York. 

New Yorli. Neu 1'~lrk 

d' 

r - 

(/ Il'nited States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 23 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Good 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DISTRICT OF MARYLAND 

I, Felicia C. Cannon, Clerk of the United States District Court for the District 

of hlaryland, 

DO HEREBY CERTIFY that, KATHLEEY F. SCLLI17AN, 

ESQUIRE, BAR NUMBER 25406, was duly admitted to practice in the 

United States District Court for the District of Mar?land on September I I, 1998, 

and is currently in good standing as a member of the bar of this Court. 

Dated at Baltimore, Maryland FEI,ICIA C. CANNOY 

Clerk 

Tina Stavrou - Deputy Clerk 

Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 23 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of J Net Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William W. Priest, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  September 28, 2004              By: /s/ William W. Priest
                                            _________________________
                                            William W. Priest
                                            Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:06-cv-14977-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03542-LAK Document 7 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The First Years Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2002, as amended by Form
10-Q/A Amendment No. 1 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on
November 15, 2002 and as hereby further amended by Amendment No. 2 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Amended
Report"), I, Ronald J. Sidman, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     1.   The Amended Report fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

                                             By: /s/ Ronald J. Sidman,
                                                 -------------------------------
                                             Ronald J. Sidman,
                                             Chairman, President, and Chief
                                             Executive Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The First Years Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2002, as amended by Form
10-Q/A Amendment No. 1 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on
November 15, 2002 and as hereby further amended by Amendment No. 2 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Amended
Report"), I, John R. Beals, Senior Vice President - Finance and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     1.   The Amended Report fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

                                        By: /s/ John R. Beals,
                                            -------------------------------
                                        John R. Beals,
                                        Senior Vice President - Finance
                                        and Treasurer,
                                        (Chief Financial Officer and Chief
                                        Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lincoln International
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
     prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


                                              /s/ RICHARD FROCKT
                                              -----------------------------
                                              Name:  Richard Frockt
                                              Title: President
                                              Date:  July 14, 2004
#### STATE v. PARDUE

No. 248 PC.

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 768.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 August 1979.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
        
<S>                                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                        MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                                    8,277
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                             261,364
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                         15,031
<PP&E>                                                                9,536,147
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        2,955,224
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        6,961,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 6,681,250
<BONDS>                                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                             10,905,065
<OTHER-SE>                                                            8,082,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          6,961,583
<SALES>                                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                              0
<CGS>                                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        264,406
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      153,441
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        (414,581)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    (414,581)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                           (414,581)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                              (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              (.04)

        

</TABLE>
#### IN RE SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOC.

No. 10 PC.

Case below: 53 N.C. App. 326.

Petition by several loan associations for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 December. 1981.
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 13-2 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 13-2 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 13-2 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 13-2 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 13-2 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03525-PKL Document 9-4 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03525-PKL Document 9-4 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03525-PKL Document 9-4 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03525-PKL Document 9-4 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 4 of 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000055373
<NAME> KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      631,985
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      6,372
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          57,047
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         7,666
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  82,552
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 785,622
<COMMON>                                        50,450
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       88,750
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             86,749
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 225,949
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           293,162
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               5,200
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  28,050
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      9,086
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 2,747
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 221,428
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  785,622
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      245,818
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             6,008
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     207,958
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     213,966
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         31,852
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                (526)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  31,326
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        17,760
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,566
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   13,566
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        18,198
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       11,404
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          40,417
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> All common stock owned by parent company; no EPS required.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
5/6/2009 Schmidt Eric

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

VIACOM INTERNATIONAL INC. COMEDY FigueirdDecI.Tab

PARTNERS COUNTRY MUSIC 111

TELEVISION INC. PARAMOUNT

PICTURES CORPORATION and BLACK

ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION LLC

Plaintiffs

vs. NO. 07CV2203

YOUTUBE INC. YOUTUBE LLC

and GOOGLE INC.

10 Defendants.

11

THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION PREMIER

12 LEAGUE LIMITED BOURNE CO. et al.

on behalf of themselves and all

13 others similarly situated

14 Plaintiffs

vs. NO. 07CV3582

15

YOUTUBE INC. YOUTUBE LLC and

16 GOOGLE INC.

17 Defendants.

18 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF ERIC SCHMIDT

SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA

19 WEDNESDAY MAY 2009

20

JOB NO. 16802

21

22

23

24

25
5/6/2009 Schmidt Eric

SCHMIDT ERIC 111-0002

If you look below it you see the little

caret It says from. Then It would be civil

offense to create thats from the Wire.com website.

see. Okay.

So to be incredibly precise on these cmails

the only words that wrote were the Digital

Millennium Copyright Act.

see. Got it. Okay.

10 Now when Google purchased YouTube did you

11 instruct Mr. Hurley and Mr. Chen that their primary

12 goal at least immediate goal was to grow the user

13 base and reach one billion views per day

14 MR. MANCINI Objection lacks foundation.

15 THE WITNESS dont recall the very

16 specific goal.

17 MR. BASIKIN Q. Does it sound like generally

18 something you said to them that their that their

19 primary objective should be to grow the user base

20 Our our policy from acquisition was to

21 grow the user base. That is correct

22 And --

23 dont recall the specific numbers.

24 You dont recall that they should grow it to

25 playbacks of one billion day

109
Case 1:07-cv-03474-NRB Document 8 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03474-NRB Document 8 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03474-NRB Document 8 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 3
Order entered October 14 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00544
- CR
PAMELA DIANE CONTRER AS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 29541


### O RDER
The Court REINSTATES the appeal. On September 10, 2015, we denied appellant’s second motion to extend time to file her brief and ordered the trial court to make findings. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant
desires to pursue the appeal; (2) appellant is indigent and is represented by court

- appointed counsel Jason Duff; (3) counsel’s explanation for the delay in filing appellant’s brief is his workload; and (4) counsel assured the trial court that he would file appellan t’s brief by October 9, 2015. The Court has received appellant’s brief.
We ORDER appellant’s brief filed as of the date of this order
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE