alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          20,557
<SECURITIES>                                    11,597
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,777
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     24,193
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,349
<PP&E>                                          58,238
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,746
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,699
<BONDS>                                          2,474
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,362
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,746
<SALES>                                        158,576
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               162,297
<CGS>                                          114,391
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  144,806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,120
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 326
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,045
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,694
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,351
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,351
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.28
        

</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DI MITRA COGDELL , A ppellant ,
v. Cas e No

. 5D 23

- 1319 LT Cas e No. 2013- CF

- 11169- A

S TATE OF FLORIDA , A ppellee

.

_

_______________________________/ D ecision filed May 16, 2023 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County , Tatiana Salvador , Judge. Dimitra Cogdell, Florida City, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.

P ER CURIAM. A FFIRMED.

E ISNAUGLE, KILBANE and MACIVER , JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lancaster Colony Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
John B. Gerlach, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company and John L. Boylan,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial conditions and results of
                operations of the Company.

                                                By: /s/ JOHN B. GERLACH, JR.
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                        John B. Gerlach, Jr.
                                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                                November 12, 2003

                                                By: /s/ JOHN L. BOYLAN
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                        John L. Boylan
                                                        Chief Financial Officer

                                                November 12, 2003
USLX: SDhT 

I 1 DOClJMl73T 

LWI'l'E1) STATES DISTRIC 1- COIIRI' I BLECTgG:;iC?,I,Z 

; E i I 

SOUTlIERN D1STRIC"I' i)F KEW YORK +-* 

iL$: ;-J: <? -f y- cJ, 

/ 1 ._ .......................................................................... ---- .,~y-._ ~i i -* 

IN KII: 

j LIXS'I'EK FILE 

FOSAMAX PKODUCTS LIABl [.IT Y L1'I~lGA'I''IC)N 

: 1 :06-M1)- 1789 (JFK) 

This Dorumeni Rel~ii~>s 7 '0 '11 I1 Act ions 

............................... ............_ I 

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO H.4C VICE 

C'onsidering the C'crtificate of Good Standing and all other documenls required by Casc 

Management Order No. 5 submitted b>- counsel. IT IS 1 1EKt:HY OKDERED that: 

Firn~ Name: Butler, Snow1 O'Mara, SIC\-C~S & Cannada. PLLC 

Address: AmSouth Pla7a. 2 10 Easl Capitol Strcet, Suite 1700 

Email Address: Christy.Jones~~bi~tlersuow.com 

is ddmittcd to practice pro hac vice as counsel li)r Merck & Co., Inc. in the above captioned case 

in the United States District Court for thc Southern District ofNc~\- l'c3rk. 

lie~v York, N~M J'ork 

Ad V -. -- 

~niicd ~[kc~ District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 1 of 3
cer-tfy that . - 

MISSISSIPPI 

Christy D. Jones 

CERTIFTCATE OF 

GO00 STANDlNCI 

, Bar # 

, Clerk qf this Court, 

~~as duly udmitted to practice h illis Court OH 

September 30, 1977 , nild is ill good standing 

as o nzemher ofthe Bar oj'this Court. 

Jackson. -- .- - Mississippi . . - - . -- - . - - . 011 March 4, 2008 . . - - -. - -. . -- -- 

/ (JC 11 770 1 1 I., 1 r.r ~ 

Dated (7t 

1. T. NOBLIN 

C'L ERK 

Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 2 of 3
1. David C:reivs, Clerk ul'tllc United Sratcs District CIourl lbr the Knrthern District of 

Mississippi, cei-ljfj the nttorncy idcrltilied below WJS ciuil aiiillitted tcj pwc~iz;: b~fbi~~ this 

Court vn the date s~atcd and is. 3s of the dart ul this certiti~atc, in good standing as a mcnlber of 

the Bar oi-lhc IJnitcd States Tlislrict Cou~l fur tllc Nort11~1-17 Ilistrict of' hlissis~ippi. 

~).\TL .A D.11 ITTE 11: OC-~ODLR 10,1978 

C;i~:en undcr m>- 11iind and Scal of this I'ourt. 

Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 188 (Friday, September 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55182-55183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4795]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[No. DoD-2007-HA-0073]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by October 
29, 2007.
    Title and OMB Number: Public Perceptions of Military Health Care; 
OMB Control Number 0720-TBD.
    Type of Request: New.
    Number of Respondents: 2,400.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 2,400.
    Average Burden per Response: 8 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 319.
    Needs and Uses: The purpose of this survey effort is to determine 
the public's perceptions of Military Health Care and compare and 
contrast that with their perceptions of U.S. Health Care.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. John Draemer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Kraemer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer

[[Page 55183]]

for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at OHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    Dated: September 11, 2007.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-4795 Filed 9-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 23, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-40169

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LUIS MANUEL HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-1418-ALL 

--------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Luis Manuel Hernandez-Gonzalez (Hernandez) pleaded guilty

without the benefit of a plea agreement to reentry into the

United States following deportation. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a),

(b).

Hernandez argues for the first time on appeal that the

district court erred in ordering him to cooperate in the

collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release

and that this condition should therefore be vacated. Hernandez’s
No. 05-40169

-2-

claim is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because it is not

ripe for review. See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu, 428 F.3d

1100, 1102 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Jan. 9,

2006) (No. 05-8662). 

 Hernandez also challenges the constitutionality of 

§ 1326(b). His constitutional challenge is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). 

Although Hernandez contends that Almendarez-Torres was

incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court

would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such

arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. 

See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Hernandez properly concedes

that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and

circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for

further review. 

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-8 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-8 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 2 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-8 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 3 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-8 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 4 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-8 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 5 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-8 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-8 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-8 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 8 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-8 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 9 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-8 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 10 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-8 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-8 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 12 of 12
#### IN RE ARTHUR

No. 106 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 227.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 17 December 1975. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 17 December 1975.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350), the undersigned, Seth L. Van Voorhees, Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of American Pacific Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to his knowledge,
that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.




                                              /s/   SETH L. VAN VOORHEES
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Seth L. Van Voorhees
                                             Executive Vice President, Chief
                                             Financial Officer, Secretary and
                                             Treasurer
                                             January 11, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Office of the Secretary

      ( print page 56103)    
                    Title 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4) provides that Notice of the Appointment of an individual to serve as a member of the Performance Review Board of the Senior Executive Service shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

The following individuals are hereby appointed to a three-year term on the Department's Performance Review Board:

Cheryl Atkinson.

Michael Connors.

Patrick Pizzella.

*For Further Information Contact:*                     Ms. Andrea Burckman, Director, Office of Executive Resources and Personnel Security, Room C5508, U.S. Department of Labor, Frances Perkins Building, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210, telephone: (202) 693-7628.                

Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of September, 2007.

Elaine L. Chao,

Secretary of Labor.

[FR Doc. 07-4853 Filed 10- 1-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-23-P
#### STATE v. BARKER

No. 93.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 729.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 15 April 1976.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

WILLIAM A. GADD,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:09cv562/LAC/EMT

WALTER A. McNEIL, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal of the instant

civil rights case filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 23).

Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) provides that an action may be dismissed without an order of the court

by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before the adverse party serves an answer or files a motion

for summary judgment. Because Defendants have not yet been served in the instant case, it is clear

that Plaintiff is automatically entitled to a voluntary dismissal at this time. Dismissal should be

without prejudice.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That Plaintiff’s motion to voluntary dismiss (Doc. 23) be GRANTED and this case be

DISMISSED without prejudice.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 6th day of April 2011.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon the magistrate judge and all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope

of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d

698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No.: 3:09cv562/LAC/EMT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          23,391
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,089
<PP&E>                                       9,536,147
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,836,780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,207,095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,129,898
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,920,791
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,207,095
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               175,621
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             211,977
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (391,422)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (391,422)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (391,422)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7259

JOSEPH EUGENE HOWARD, Petitioner – Appellant,

v. DAVID BALLARD, Warden, Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00112-FPS-JSK)

Submitted: January 7, 2010 Decided: January 15, 2010

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Eugene Howard, Appellant Pro Se. R. Christopher Smith, Charleston, West Virginia; Dawn Ellen Warfield, Deputy Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Eugene Howard seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Howard has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### STATE v. WINFREY

No. 100 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 266.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 May 1979.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Christopher Hildebrand v. Dodi Marie Hildebrand

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 00933

- CV

Trial court case number: 16

- 1905

- CV

Trial court: 25 th District Court of Guadalupe County

Appellant, Christopher Hildebrand, has filed a motion for bench warrant or to appear by telephone to provide testimony to this Court “for the final hearing

. ” The Clerk

of this Court issued a notice on February 10, 2020

, stating, “ T he Court will not hear oral argument” in this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 39.1 (providing that court of appeals may “decide[] that oral argument is unnecessary” for certain reasons). Moreover, t his Court may only consider evidence that was pres ented to the trial court and appears in the record on appeal. See Ginn v. Forrester , 282 S.W.3d 430, 43 2

– 3 3 (Tex. 2009) (stating that , in restricted appeal, error must appear on face of record and extrinsic evidence will not support restricted appeal); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.1 (“The appellate record consists of the clerk’s record and, if necessary to the appeal, the reporter’s record.”); see also T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5 (clerk’s record), 34.6 (reporter’s record) , 38.1(g) (providi ng that statement of facts in appellant’s brief “must be supported by record references), 38.1 ( i ) (providing that argument in appellant’s brief must be supported “with appropriate citations . . . to the record.”).

Accordingly, we deny appell ant ’s motion.

I t is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: March 24, 2020