alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


To the Board of Directors of
eChapman, Inc.:

We have audited in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States, the consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations,
changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31,
2001 of eChapman, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) included in this Form 10-K
and have issued our report thereon dated May 15, 2002. Our audits were made for
the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a
whole. The schedule listed in the accompanying index is the responsibility of
the Company's management and is presented for purposes of complying with the
Securities Exchange Commission's rules and is not part of the basic financial
statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied
in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly
state, in all material respects, the financial data required to be set forth
therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.


/s/ Wilkins McNair, PC
-----------------------
Wilkins McNair, PC

May 15, 2002
#### STATE v. BAILEY

No. 71 PC.

Case below: 12 N.C. App. 494.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 7 December 1971.
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-10 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-10 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 2 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-10 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 3 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-10 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 4 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-10 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 5 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-10 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 6 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-10 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 7 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-10 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 8 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-10 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 9 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-10 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 10 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-10 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 11 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-10 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 12 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-10 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 13 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-10 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 14 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-10 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 15 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-10 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 16 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-10 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 17 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-10 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 18 of 18
#### STATE v. RICH

No. 29.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 60.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 February 1972. Appeal dismissed for lack of substantial constitutional question 1 February 1972.
#### BURGESS v. BREWING CO.

No. 43 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 481.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 4 April 1979.
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM

PART I. TRANSCRIPT ORDER INFORMATION

Appellant to complete and file with the District Court Clerk within 10 days of the filing of the notice of appeal in all cases, including 

those in which there was no hearing or for which no transcript is ordered.

Short Case Style: vs

District Court No.: Date Notice of Appeal Filed: Court of Appeals No.:

(If Available)

CHOOSE ONE:  No hearing  No transcript is required for appeal purposes  All necessary transcript(s) on file

 I AM ORDERING A TRANSCRIPT OF THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS:

Check appropriate box(es) and provide all information requested:

 HEARING DATE(S) JUDGE/MAGISTRATE COURT REPORTER NAME(S) 

 Pre-Trial Proceedings

 Trial 

 Sentence

 Other

METHOD OF PAYMENT:

 I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONTACTED THE COURT REPORTER(S) AND HAVE MADE SATISFACTORY

 ARRANGEMENTS WITH THE COURT REPORTER(S) FOR PAYING THE COST OF THE TRANSCRIPT.

 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT. Attached for submission to District Judge/Magistrate is my completed CJA Form 24 requesting authorization

for government payment of transcript. [A transcript of the following proceedings will be provided ONLY IF SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED

in Item 13 on CJA Form 24: Voir Dire; Opening and Closing Statements of Prosecution and Defense; Prosecution Rebuttal; Jury Instructions.]

Ordering Counsel/Party: 

Name of Firm: 

Street Address/P.O. Box: 

City/State/Zip Code: Phone No. :

I certify that I have completed and filed PART I with the District Court Clerk, sent a copy to the appropriate Court Reporter(s) if ordering a

transcript, mailed a filed copy to the Court of Appeals Clerk, and served all parties.

DATE: SIGNED: Attorney for: 

PART II. COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Court Reporter to complete and file with the District Court Clerk within 10 days of receipt. The Court Reporter shall send

a copy to the Court of Appeals Clerk and to all parties.

Date Transcript Order received:

 Satisfactory arrangements for paying the cost of the transcript were completed on: 

 Satisfactory arrangements for paying the cost of the transcript have not been made.

No. of hearing days: Estimated no. of transcript pages: Estimated filing date: 

DATE: SIGNED: Phone No. :

NOTE: The transcript is due to be filed within 30 days of the date satisfactory arrangements for paying the cost of the

transcript were completed unless the Court Reporter obtains an extension of time to file the transcript.

PART III. NOTIFICATION THAT TRANSCRIPT HAS BEEN FILED IN DISTRICT COURT

Court Reporter to complete and file with the District Court Clerk on date of filing transcript in District Court. The Court

Reporter shall send a copy to the Court of Appeals Clerk on the same date.

This is to certify that the transcript has been completed and filed with the district court on (date): 

Actual No. of Volumes and Hearing Dates: 

Date: Signature of Court Reporter:

Rev. 2/06

Sherrie Russell-Brown University of Florida Board of Trustees et al

1:09-cv-00257-MP-GRJ 09/14/10 10-14328D

✔

✔

09/23/10 /s/ Lennox S. Hinds Sherrie Russell-Brown

✔
#### STATE v. ALSTON

No. 182 P.C.

Case below: 38 N.C. App. 219.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 February 1979.
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SheerVision, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2008 filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Suzanne Lewsadder, Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
      and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
      presented.




Dated:
                November 21, 2008By:
            /s/
                Suzanne LewsadderSuzanne
                LewsadderChief
                Executive Officer




This
      certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to SheerVision, Inc. and will be retained by SheerVision, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

William Lyon Homes, Inc.

  State of Incorporation: California

Presley Homes

  State of Incorporation: California

California Equity Funding, Inc.

  State of Incorporation: California

PH Institutional Ventures

  State of Incorporation: California

Duxford Interiors

  State of Incorporation: California

PH Ventures -- San Jose

  State of Incorporation: California

Presley CMR, Inc.

  State of Incorporation: California

HSP Inc.

  State of Incorporation: California

Duxford Financial, Inc.

  State of Incorporation: California

The Presley Companies

  State of Incorporation: California

Presley Southwest, Inc.

  State of Incorporation: Arizona

William Lyon Southwest, Inc.

  State of Incorporation: Arizona

Mountain Gate Ventures, Inc.

  State of Incorporation: Arizona
<PAGE>   2

PH - LP Ventures

  State of Incorporation: California

PH - Rielly Ventures

  State of Incorporation: Arizona

Duxford Title Reinsurance Co.

  State of Incorporation: Vermont

Other names under which William Lyon Homes conducts business:

     William Lyon Homes - Southern California Division
     William Lyon Homes - Northern California Division
     William Lyon Homes - San Diego Division
     William Lyon Homes - Arizona Division
     William Lyon Homes - Nevada Division
     Horsethief Canyon Partners
     Oakhurst Country Club
     Presley Homes - Thousand Oaks, L.P.
     Presley Torrey I Associates, LLC
     Presley Torrey II Associates, LLC
     Presley Mercy Associates, LLC
     Cerro Plata Associates, LLC
     Stonecrest - San Diego, L.P.
     White Cloud Estates - Simi Valley, L.P.
     Meadowlark - San Marcos, L.P.
     CP at Forster Ranch, L.P.
     East Grove, L.P.
     Fairway Farms, LLC
     PHI Otay Ranch Associates, LLC
     PHI Castle Creek Associates, LLC
     Lyon Manor at Thomas Ranch, LLC
     Lyon Plantation at Thomas Ranch, LLC
     Lyon Ridge, LLC
     LP Homes #1, LLC
     St. Helena Westminster Estates, LLC
     Laurel Creek Associates, LLC
     Summerlane - HB, L.P.
     Atlanta & Beach, L.P.
     Woodlake, L.P.
     Stonebriar L.P.
     Reston Associates, LLC
     Hampton Road Associates, LLC
     Henry Ranch, LLC
     Otay R-29, LLC
     4S Lot 12, LLC
     Presley - Rielly Orange Groves, LLC
     Bayport Mortgage, L.P.
- Text129: 
    - Text130:
Case 7:07-cv-03510-SCR Document 2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 12 Filed 08/13/2007 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 12 Filed 08/13/2007 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 12 Filed 08/13/2007 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 12 Filed 08/13/2007 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 12 Filed 08/13/2007 Page 5 of 5
#### STATE v. NUNNERY

No. 51 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 756.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 December 1977.
Exhibit 32.1

Furnished (but not filed) as an exhibit to the periodic report identified in the Certification.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gentiva Health Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 28, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Tony Strange, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 12, 2009



/s/ Tony StrangeTony StrangeChief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                          100995
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    51306
<ALLOWANCES>                                     40331
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                112311
<PP&E>                                         3500473
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2440327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1172457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            63417
<BONDS>                                         382905
<COMMON>                                       1300019
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (573884)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1172457
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 76766
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    96089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9695
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (29018)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (29018)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (29018)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

v. Case No. 3:09cr94/MCR

ART CASTILLO, JR.

_______________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed.

R. Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to Count One of the Second Superseding

Indictment. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning

each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was

knowing and voluntary and that the offenses charged are supported by independent

bases in fact containing each ofthe essential elementsthereof. I therefore recommend

that the plea of guilty be accepted and that the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and

have sentence imposed accordingly.

Dated: October 29, 2013

/s/Charles J. Kahn, Jr. 

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITEDSTATESMAGISTRATEJUDGE
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be

filed within twenty four (24) hours after being served a copy thereof. Any

different deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s

internal use only, and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served

upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review

of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698,

701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No. 3:09cr94/MCR
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      14,951,215
<SECURITIES>                                11,813,825
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,283,964
<ALLOWANCES>                                   524,000
<INVENTORY>                                    180,389
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,054,017
<PP&E>                                      17,956,776
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,772,277
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,456,162
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,785,541
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,385
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,731,606
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                66,456,162
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            51,070,353
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,307,290
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,938,661
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                60,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             234,039
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,276,304
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,978,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,298,304
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,298,304
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84
        

</TABLE>
#### HATHCOCK v. LOWDER

No. 77 PC.

Case below: 16 N.C. App. 255.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 December 1972.
Exhibit 10.10





EXHIBIT 10.10




FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE




LSI INDUSTRIES INC. RETIREMENT PLAN

(Amended and Restated as of February 1, 2006)




This FOURTH AMENDMENT made as of this 19th day of August, 2009, by LSI Industries
Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the “Corporation”).



W I T N E S S E T H:




WHEREAS, the Corporation maintains the LSI Industries Inc. Retirement Plan amended and
restated as of February 1, 2006 (the “Plan”);



WHEREAS, Section 12.1 of the Plan allows the Corporation to modify or amend the Plan in whole
or in part; and



WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Plan to reduce the amount of the Annual Employer
Contribution from 4% to 2% for the Plan Year that begins on July 1, 2009 and ends on June 30, 2010
and for each Plan Year thereafter, unless subsequent amendments are made.



NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:



1. Effective for the Plan Year ending June 30, 2010 and subsequent Plan Years, Section 4.3(a)
is amended by adding a sentence at the end thereof to read as follows:




Except as provided in an Adoption Agreement, each Employer shall contribute for each
Plan Year beginning on or after July 1, 2009, an amount equal to the sum of 2% of
Annual Earnings plus 2% of Excess Earnings (hereinafter the “Annual Employer
Contribution”) for such Plan Year paid by such Employer to each Participant who
satisfies the requirements of Section 4.3(b).



2. Effective for the Plan Year ending June 30, 2010 and subsequent Plan Years, Section 4.3(c)
is amended by adding a sentence at the end thereof to read as follows:




The allocation formula described above shall be amended by replacing “4%” each place
it appears with “2%” effective for Plan Years ending on or after June 30, 2010.



3. Effective for the Plan Year ending June 30, 2010 and subsequent Plan Years, Section 5.3(b)
is amended by adding a sentence at the end thereof to read as follows:




Effective for Plan Years beginning on or after July 1, 2009, this provision shall be
applied on the basis of the Annual Employer Contribution being 2% of Annual Earnings
plus 2% of Excess Earnings.


 


 









 





LSI Industries Inc. has signed this Fourth Amendment and otherwise ratifies and approves the
Plan in all other respects on the date and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	LSI INDUSTRIES INC.

 	 
	 	BY:  	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	ITS:
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

September 23, 2015

Hon. Stephen A. Doggett

Attorney At Law

201 South Eleventh Street

Richmond, TX 77469

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Mr. Timothy Williams

TDCJ #01960910

Alfred Hughes Unit

Rt. 2, Box 4400

Gatesville, TX 76597

Hon. Ross M. Kurtz

District Attorney

100 S. Fulton, Suite 100

Wharton, TX 77488

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-14-00669-CR

Tr.Ct.No. 15,273

Style: Timothy Williams v. The State of Texas

The above-referenced cause has been set for submission without oral argument 

on Wednesday, October 14, 2015, before a panel consisting of Chief Justice Rogelio 

Valdez, Justice Nelda V. Rodriguez and Justice Gregory T. Perkes. 

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch
Case 1:07-cv-03551-RWS Document 11 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03551-RWS Document 11 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03551-RWS Document 11 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03551-RWS Document 11 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03551-RWS Document 11 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03551-RWS Document 11 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03551-RWS Document 11 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03551-RWS Document 11 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 8 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 16 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 16 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 16 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 3 of 3
# C_2011047EN.01001001.xml

| 15.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/10

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2011/C 47/05

1.   The European Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below, as provided for in Article 2 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1202/2009 (1) imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of furfuryl alcohol originating in the People's Republic of China.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 4/92, 1049 Brussels (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (3).

3

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Furfuryl alcohol | People's Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1202/2009 (OJ L 323, 10.12.2009, p. 48) | 10.12.2011 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Furfuryl alcohol

People's Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1202/2009 (OJ L 323, 10.12.2009, p. 48)

10.12.2011

---

(1)  OJ L 323, 10.12.2009, p. 48.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

(3)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

3

---