Exhibit 99.1
 I. INDIVIDUAL SMOKER CASES
 Florida
 Engle Progeny Cases
 Pursuant to the Florida Supreme Courts July 2006 ruling in Engle v. Liggett Group Inc.,
which decertified the Engleclass on a prospective basis, former class members had one year
from January 11, 2007 to file individual lawsuits. In addition, some individuals who filed
suit prior to January 11, 2007, and who claim they meet the conditions in Engle, are
attempting to avail themselves of the Engleruling. Lawsuits by individuals requesting the
benefit of the Engleruling, whether filed before or after the January 11, 2007 mandate, are
hereinafter referred to as the Engleprogeny cases. As of March 31, 2010, Liggett and/or
the Company were named in approximately 7,160 Engleprogeny cases in both state and federal
courts in Florida. These cases include approximately 8,500 plaintiffs, approximately 3,860
of whom have claims pending in federal court and 5,295 in state court. Duplicate cases were
filed in federal and state court on behalf of approximately 660 of these plaintiffs. The
majority of the cases pending in federal court are stayed pending the outcome of an appeal
to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals of several district court orders in which it was
found that the Florida Supreme Courts decision in Englewas unconstitutional. The total
number of cases will likely increase as courts may require multi-plaintiff cases to be
severed into individual cases. The total number of plaintiffs may increase as a result of
attempts by existing plaintiffs to add additional parties. For more information on the Engle
case, see Note 5. Contingencies. As of March 31, 2010, 38 alleged Engleprogeny cases,
where Liggett is currently a named defendant, were scheduled for trial in 2010 and 2011.
These cases, and cases that have been tried and are currently on appeal, or will be
appealed, are described below:
 Alexander v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 01-2008-CA-5067, Circuit Court of the
8th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Alachua County (case filed 01/10/08). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is
scheduled for trial starting 06/07/10.Allen v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 16-2007-CA-008311-AXXX-MA, Circuit
Court of the 4th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Duval County (case filed 09/18/07).
One individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case
is scheduled for trial starting 06/07/10.Allen v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 08-6848, Circuit Court of the
13th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Hillsborough County (case filed 03/28/08). One
smoker suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is set for
trial starting 10/04/10.Brock v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 01-2007-CA-5190, Circuit Court of the
8th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Alachua County (case filed 12/18/07). One
individual suing. The case is scheduled for trial starting 12/06/10.Bronstein v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 38-2007-CA-1190, Circuit Court of the
8th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Levy County (case filed 11/29/07). One individual
suing. The case is scheduled for trial starting 09/07/10.Campbell, et al. v. R.J. Reynolds., et al.,Case No. 2008-CA-2147, Circuit Court of
the 1st Judicial Circuit, Florida, Escambia County (case filed 07/08/08). This
is a wrongful death action
which proceeded to jury trial in July 2009. In August 2009, the jury returned a verdict in
favor of the plaintiff and awarded compensatory damages in the amount of $7,800,000. The
jury




---



##### 



apportioned damages as follows: plaintiff  57%, R.J. Reynolds  39%, Philip Morris
  2%, and Liggett  2% ($156,000). No punitive damages were awarded against Liggett.
Plaintiff moved for an award of attorneys fees against Liggett pursuant to the fee shifting
provisions of Floridas proposal for settlement statute based on a settlement offer that was
not accepted by Liggett. Entitlement to an attorney fee award, and the amount of such an
award, will be determined in a separate proceeding. Defendants appealed the verdict.Campbell, et al. v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 09-CA-000493, Circuit Court of
the 13th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Hillsborough County (case filed 01/09/09).
One individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is
presently scheduled for trial starting 10/04/10.Clay v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 2007-CA-003020, Circuit Court of the
1st Judicial Circuit, Florida, Escambia County (case filed 12/13/07). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. Trial
commenced on 03/22/10. On 04/13/10, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff
and awarded compensatory damages in the amount of $3,490,000. The jury apportioned damages
as follows: plaintiff  30%, Liggett  10% ($349,000), R.J. Reynolds  60%. The jury
found Liggett liable for $1,000,000 in punitive damages. Defendants intend to appeal the
verdict.Cohen v. Philip Morris, Inc., et al., Case No. 07-46336, Circuit Court of the
11th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Miami-Dade County (case filed 12/28/07). One
individual suing. The case is scheduled for trial starting 12/06/10.Cox v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 01-2008-CA-3712, Circuit Court of the
8th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Alachua County (case filed 07/25/08). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is
scheduled for trial in 12/06/10.Douglas v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 08-8108, Circuit Court of the
13th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Hillsborough County (case filed 11/02/07). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. On 03/10/10,
the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and awarded compensatory damages in
the amount of $5,000,000. The jury apportioned damages as follows: plaintiff  50%,
Liggett  27% ($1,350,000), Philip Morris  18% and R.J. Reynolds  5%. No punitive
damages were awarded. Plaintiff moved for an award of attorneys fees against Liggett
pursuant to the fee shifting provisions of Floridas proposal for settlement statute based
on a settlement offer that was not accepted by Liggett. Entitlement to an attorney fee
award, and the amount of such an award, will be determined in a separate proceeding.
Defendants intend to appeal the verdict. A hearing on post trial motions is scheduled for
06/03/10.Downs v. Philip Morris, et al., Case No. 07-46314, Circuit Court of the
11th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Miami-Dade County (case filed 12/28/07). One
individual suing. The case is scheduled for trial 09/13/10.Duque v. Philip Morris, et al., Case No. 07-46324, Circuit Court of the
11th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Miami-Dade County (case filed 12/28/07). One
individual suing. The case is scheduled for the two week trial period starting 09/20/10.Finley v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 2009-CA-32356, Circuit Court of the
7th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Volusia County (case filed 12/13/07). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is
presently scheduled for trial starting in 10/04/10.
 2




---



##### 



Friedman v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 38-2007-CA-1248, Circuit Court of
the 8th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Levy County (case filed 12/17/07). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is
scheduled for trial starting 08/02/10.Gafney v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 07-CA-020540, Circuit Court of
the 15th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Palm Beach County (case filed 11/14/07). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is
scheduled for trial starting 10/12/10.Haber v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 07-45748, Circuit Court of the
11th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Miami-Dade County (case filed 12/24/07). One
individual suing. The case is scheduled for trial starting 08/02/10.Haldeman v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 07-3798, Circuit Court of the
5th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Marion County (case filed 12/11/07). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is
scheduled for the two week trial period starting 11/08/10.Hall v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 01-2008-CA-3979, Circuit Court of the
8th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Alachua County (case filed 07/25/08). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is
scheduled for trial starting 10/04/10.Harewood v. Philip Morris, et al., Case No. 07-46331, Circuit Court of the
11th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Miami-Dade County (case filed 12/28/07). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is
scheduled for the four week trial period commencing 10/04/10.Harvey v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 01-2007-CA-5087, Circuit Court of the
8th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Alachua County (case filed 12/10/07). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is
scheduled for the two week trial period starting 08/30/10.Hetzner v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 2008-32278-CICI, Circuit Court of the
7th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Volusia County (case filed 06/30/08). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is
scheduled for trial in 09/13/10.Katz v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 2009-CA-004037, Circuit Court of the
15th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Palm Beach County (case filed 02/04/09). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is
presently scheduled for trial starting 11/29/10.Lowe v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 07-3801, Circuit Court of the 5th
Judicial Circuit, Florida, Marion County (case filed 12/07/07). One individual suing on
behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is scheduled for trial
starting 01/10/11.Lukacs v. R. J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 01-38-22 CA23, Circuit Court of the
11th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Miami-Dade County (case filed 12/15/01). One
individual suing on behalf of the
estate and survivors of a deceased smoker, as a decertified Engleclass member. In June
2002, the jury awarded $37,500,000 in compensatory damages, jointly and severally, which was
subsequently reduced by the court. The jury found Liggett 50% responsible. In August 2008,
the
 3




---



##### 



court entered judgment in the amount of $24,835,000, plus interest from June 2002. In
October 2008, plaintiff withdrew her request for punitive damages. In November 2008, the
court entered final judgment. In December 2008, the defendants appealed the decision to the
Third District Court of Appeal. On 03/17/10, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed
the award. Defendants moved for reconsideration. For more information on the Lukacscase,
see Note 5. Contingencies.Marraffino (formerly Talenfeld) v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 08-22565, Circuit
Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Broward County (case filed
05/20/08). One individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker.
The case is scheduled for the trial period of 06/28/10  09/24/10.Muhlig v. Philip Morris, et al., Case No. 07-46352, Circuit Court of the
11th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Miami-Dade County (case filed 12/28/07). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is
scheduled for trial starting 08/09/10.ODwyer-Harkins v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 16-2008-CA-000009-XXXX-MA,
Circuit Court of the 4th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Duval County (case filed
01/02/08). One individual suing as on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased
smoker. The case is scheduled for trial in 08/10.Palmieri v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 07-26287, Circuit Court of the
17th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Broward County (case filed 10/10/07). Two
individuals suing. The case is scheduled for the trial docket commencing 09/27/10 through
12/17/10.Perez v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 08-04304, Circuit Court of the
11th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Miami-Dade County (case filed 01/02/08). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is
set for trial in 09/20/10.Perry v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 01-2008-CA-150, Circuit Court of the
8th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Alachua County (case filed 07/25/08). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is
scheduled for the two week trial period starting 11/01/10.Putney v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 07-36668, Circuit Court of the
17th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Broward County (case filed 12/28/07). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. Trial commenced
on 03/29/10. On 04/26/10, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and awarded
compensatory damages in the amount of $15,000,000. The jury apportioned damages as follows:
plaintiff  35%, Liggett  20% ($3,017,338), Philip Morris  15% and R.J. Reynolds 
30%. No punitive damages were awarded against Liggett. Plaintiff moved for an award of
attorneys fees against Liggett pursuant to the fee shifting provisions of Floridas
proposal for settlement statute based on a settlement offer that was not accepted by
Liggett. Entitlement to an attorney fee award, and the amount of such an award, will be
determined in a separate proceeding. Defendants intend to appeal the verdict.Revels v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 38-2007-CA-1192, Circuit Court of the
8th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Levy County (case filed 11/29/07). Two
individuals suing. The case is scheduled for trial starting 10/04/10.
 4




---



##### 



Richter v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 50 2008-CA-038650, Circuit Court of the
15th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Palm Beach County (case filed 12/08/08). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is
scheduled for trial on or about 01/31/11.Rizzuto v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. H27-CA-2008-003318, Circuit Court of the
5th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Hernando County (case filed 05/21/08). The case
is scheduled for the three week trial period starting 10/25/10.Rohr v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 07-34472, Circuit Court of the
17th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Broward County (case filed 12/12/07). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is
scheduled for the trial period of 03/29/10  06/25/10.Santana v. Philip Morris, et al., Case No. 07-16279, Circuit Court of the
11th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Miami-Dade County (case filed 05/31/07). One
individual suing. The case is scheduled for the two week trial period starting 01/18/11.Simon v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 50 2008-CA-038812, Circuit Court of the
15th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Palm Beach County (case filed 12/08/08). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is
scheduled for the trial starting 05/05/11.Sotherden v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 01-2008-CA-3116, Circuit Court of the
8th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Alachua County (case filed 06/09/08). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is
presently scheduled for the two week trial period starting 08/02/10.Tullo v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Case No. 2008-CA-035457, Circuit Court of the
15th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Palm Beach County (case filed 11/14/08). One
individual suing. The case is presently scheduled for the six week trial period starting
11/01/10.Webb v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 38-2009-1285, Circuit Court of the
8th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Levy County (case filed 11/13/09). One individual
suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is scheduled for
trial starting 11/01/10.Weick v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 08-CA-006827, Circuit Court of the
13th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Hillsborough County (case filed 03/28/08). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors or a deceased smoker. The case is
scheduled for the three week trial period starting 07/26/10.Weingart v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 08-CA-038878, Circuit Court of the
15th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Palm Beach County (case filed 12/8/08). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. The case is
scheduled for trial starting 10/12/10.
 Other Individual Cases
 Beatty v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 50-2009-CA-032435 (AB), Circuit Court of
the 15th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Palm Beach County (case filed 09/24/09). Two
individuals suing.Bryant v. Philip Morris Inc., et al., Case No. 50-2008-CA-25429 (AJ), Circuit Court
of the 15th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Palm Beach County (case filed 08/25/08).
One individual suing as personal representative of the estate and survivors of a deceased
smoker.
 5




---



##### 



Caldwell v. Philip Morris Inc., et al., Case No. 08-000391 (AA), Circuit Court of
the 15th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Palm Beach County (case filed 01/07/08). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker.Cowart v. Liggett Group Inc., et al., Case No. 98-01483-CA, Circuit Court of the
4th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Duval County (case filed 03/16/98). One
individual suing. Liggett is the only tobacco company defendant in this case. The case is
dormant.Diamond v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 08-24533, Circuit Court of the
17th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Broward County (case filed 05/30/08). One
individual suing.Ferlanti v. Liggett Group LLC, Case No. 03-21697, Circuit Court of the
17th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Broward County (case filed 12/11/03). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker. Liggett was
the sole defendant in this action. Trial concluded in February 2009 and the jury returned
a verdict for plaintiff in the amount of $1,200,000 (plus $95,972 in economic damages) but
found plaintiff 40% at fault, which reduced the damages award to $815,972. No punitive
damages were awarded. The final judgment was entered on March 30, 2009. Liggett appealed
the verdict. In May 2009, the court granted plaintiffs motion for an award of attorneys
fees. A hearing is scheduled during the courts third quarter trial calendar.Fine v. Philip Morris, Inc., et al., Case No. 08-000383 (AA), Circuit Court of the
15th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Palm Beach County (case filed 01/07/08). One
individual suing on behalf of the estate and survivors of a deceased smoker.Grose v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 08-38276, Circuit Court of the
17th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Broward County (case filed 08/15/08). One
individual suing as personal representative of the estate and survivors of a deceased
smoker.Hikin, et al. v. Philip Morris Inc., et al., Case No. 08-57479, Circuit Court of the
17th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Broward County (case filed 11/21/08). Two
individuals suing.Laschke, et al. v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 96-8131-CI-008, Circuit Court of
the 6th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Pinellas County (case filed 12/20/96). Two
individuals suing. The dismissal of the case was reversed on appeal, and the case was
remanded to the trial court. An amended complaint was filed by the plaintiffs. In January
2006, defendants filed motions to dismiss the amended complaint.McKeever v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., et al., Case No. 09-87681, Circuit Court of
the 11th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Miami-Dade County (case filed 12/04/09). Two
individuals suing.Meckler v. Liggett Group Inc., Case No. 97-03949-CA, Circuit Court of the
4th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Duval County (case filed 07/10/97). One
individual suing. Liggett is the only tobacco company defendant in this case. The case is
dormant.Rawls v. Liggett Group Inc., Case No. 97-01354-CA, Circuit Court of the
4th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Duval County (case filed 03/06/97). One
individual suing. Liggett is the only tobacco company defendant in this case. The case is
dormant.
 6




---



##### 



Spivak v. Philip Morris Inc., et al., Case No. 08-19309 (AH), Circuit Court of the
15th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Palm Beach County (case filed 06/26/08). One
individual suing as personal representative of the estate and survivors of a deceased
smoker.Spry, et al. v. Liggett Group LLC, et al., Case No. 06-31216 CICI, Circuit Court of
the 7th Judicial Circuit, Florida, Volusia County (case filed 07/27/06). Two
individuals suing. Discovery is pending.
 Louisiana
 Dimm, et al. v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 53919, Circuit Court of the
18th Judicial District Court, Louisiana, Iberville Parish (case filed 07/25/00).
Seven individuals suing.Hunter, et al. v. R. J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 2002/18748m, Circuit Court of the
Civil District Court, Louisiana, Parish of Orleans (case filed 12/04/02). Two individuals
suing.Newsom, et al. v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 105838, Circuit Court of the
16th Judicial District Court, Louisiana, St. Mary Parish (case filed 05/17/00).
Five individuals suing.Oser v. The American Tobacco Co., et al., Case No. 97-9293, Circuit Court of the
Civil District Court, Louisiana, Parish of Orleans (case filed 05/27/97). One individual
suing.Reese, et al. v. R. J. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 2003-12761, Circuit Court of the
22ndJudicial District Court, Louisiana, St. Tammany Parish (case filed
06/10/03). Five individuals suing.
 Maryland
 Carder, et al. v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., et al., Case No. 24-X-09-000139,
Circuit Court, Maryland, Baltimore City (case filed 09/04/09). Plaintiff is suing
individually and as personal representative of the estate of a deceased smoker. Plaintiff
seeks damages allegedly caused to decedent by exposure to asbestos and cigarettes, with
claims against certain asbestos manufacturer defendants and certain tobacco company
defendants, including Liggett. Liggett filed a motion to dismiss on October 28, 2009. A
decision is pending.Slaughter, et al., v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., et al., Case No. 24-X-06-000394,
Circuit Court, Maryland, Baltimore City (case filed 02/10/09). Plaintiff is suing
individually and as personal representative of the estate of a deceased smoker. Plaintiff
seeks damages allegedly caused to decedent by exposure to asbestos and cigarettes, with
claims against certain asbestos manufacturer defendants and certain tobacco company
defendants, including Liggett. Liggett filed a motion to dismiss on January 8, 2010. A
decision is pending.
 Missouri
 Nuzum, et al. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, et al., Case No.
03-cv-237237, Circuit Court, Missouri, Jackson County (case filed 05/21/03). Two
individuals suing.
 New York
 Brantley v. The American Tobacco Company, et al., Case No. 114317/01, Supreme Court
of New York, New York County (case filed 07/23/01). One individual suing.
 7




---



##### 



Debobes v. The American Tobacco Company, et al., Case No. 29544/92, Supreme Court of
New York, Nassau County (case filed 10/17/97). One individual suing.Hausrath, et al. v. Liggett Group LLC, Case No. I2001-09526, Supreme Court of New
York, Erie County (case filed 01/24/02). Two individuals suing. Liggett is the only
defendant in this case.James v. The American Tobacco Company, et al., Case No. 103034/02, Supreme Court of
New York, New York County (case filed 04/04/97). One individual suing.Shea, et al. v. The American Tobacco Company, et al., Case No. 008938/03, Supreme
Court of New York, Nassau County (case filed 10/17/97). Two individuals suing. The trial
court granted defendants motion to dismiss plaintiffs claims for punitive damages as
barred by the prior settlement with the New York Attorney General, but denied the
defendants motion to dismiss the case. Both parties appealed. The case has been stayed,
by agreement of the parties, pending appeal. Oral argument was held on March 11, 2010. A
decision is pending.Standish v. The American Tobacco Company, et al., Case No. 18418-97, Supreme Court
of New York, Bronx County (case filed 07/28/97). One individual suing.Tomasino, et al. v. The American Tobacco Company, et al., Case No. 027182/97,
Supreme Court of New York, Nassau County (case filed 09/23/97). Two individuals suing. The
trial court granted defendants motion to dismiss plaintiffs claims for punitive damages as
barred by the prior settlement with the New York Attorney General, but denied the
defendants motion to dismiss the case. Both parties appealed. The case has been stayed,
by agreement of the parties, pending appeal. Oral argument was held on March 11, 2010. A
decision is pending.Tormey, et al. v. The American Tobacco Company, et al., Case No. 2005-0506, Supreme
Court of New York, Onondaga County (case filed 01/25/05). Two individuals suing.Yedwabnick v. The American Tobacco Company, et al., Case No. 20525/97, Supreme Court
of New York, Queens County (case filed 09/19/97). One individual suing. A Note of Issue
requesting a trial date is scheduled to be filed on May 28, 2010.
 Ohio
 Croft, et al. v. Akron Gasket & Packing, et al., Case No. CV04541681, Court of
Common Pleas, Ohio, Cuyahoga County (case filed 08/25/05). Two individuals suing.
 West Virginia
 Brewer, et al. v. The American Tobacco Company, et al., Case No. 01-C-82, Circuit
Court, West Virginia, Ohio County (case filed 03/20/01). Two individuals suing.Little v. The American Tobacco Company, et al., Case No. 01-C-235, Circuit Court,
West Virginia, Ohio County (case filed 06/04/01). One individual suing.
 8




---



##### 



II. CLASS ACTION CASES
 Smoking Related
 Brown, et al. v. Philip Morris USA Inc., et al., (In Re: Tobacco II Cases), Case No.
711400, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego (case filed 10/01/97). In April
2001, under the California Unfair Competition Laws and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, the
court granted in part the plaintiffs motion for certification of a class composed of
residents of California who smoked at least one of the defendants cigarettes from June 10,
1993 through April 23, 2001, and who were exposed to the defendants marketing and
advertising activities in California. The action was brought against the major U.S.
cigarette manufacturers, including Liggett, seeking to recover restitution, disgorgement of
profits and other equitable relief under California Business and Professions Code.
Certification was granted as to the plaintiffs claims that the defendants violated § 17200
of the California Business and Professions Code pertaining to unfair competition. The
court, however, refused to certify the class under the California Legal Remedies Act or the
plaintiffs common law claims. Following the November 2004 passage of a proposition in
California that changed the law regarding cases of this nature, the defendants moved to
decertify the class. In March 2005, the court granted the defendants motion. In May 2005,
the plaintiffs appealed. In September 2006, the California Court of Appeal affirmed the
order decertifying the class. In May 2009, the California Supreme Court reversed the order
of decertification and remanded the case for further proceedings regarding whether the class
representatives can demonstrate standing. In June 2009, the defendants filed a Petition for
Rehearing in the California Supreme Court, which was denied by the court in August 2009. In
September 2009, plaintiffs counsel informed the trial court that plaintiffs intend to seek
reconsideration of the trial courts order finding that plaintiffs allegations regarding
lights cigarettes were preempted by federal law. Plaintiffs contend that the recent decision
in Altria Group v. Good, by the United States Supreme Court, necessitates reconsideration of
the trial courts September 2004 preemption ruling. The defendants oppose the
reconsideration motion. A hearing was held on the motion on March 11, 2010. A decision is
pending. Following the decision on reconsideration, the court will address the issue of
standing, if necessary.Cleary, et al. v. Philip Morris, Inc., et al., Case No. 09-cv-01596, USDC Northern
District of Illinois (case was originally filed 06/03/98 in Circuit Court of Cook County,
Illinois). The action was brought on behalf of persons who have allegedly been injured by
(1) the defendants purported conspiracy pursuant to which defendants allegedly concealed
material facts regarding the addictive nature of nicotine; (2) the defendants alleged acts
of targeting their advertising and marketing to minors; and (3) the defendants claimed
breach of the publics right to defendants compliance with laws prohibiting the
distribution of cigarettes to minors. The plaintiffs seek disgorgement of all profits
unjustly received through defendants sale of cigarettes to plaintiffs. In March 2009,
plaintiffs filed a Third Amended Complaint replacing one named class representative with a
new plaintiff and adding new allegations regarding defendants sale of light cigarettes.
In March 2009, defendants filed a notice of removal to the United States District Court for
the Northern District of Illinois. In April 2009, plaintiffs filed a motion to remand the
case back to the Circuit Court of Cook County. In April 2009, plaintiffs in 11 lights
class actions, including Cleary, moved to consolidate these 11 actions in a Multidistrict
Litigation entitled In Re: Light Cigarettes Product Liability Litigation. The motion, as to
consolidation of the Clearycase, was denied by the court in September 2009. In November
2009, plaintiffs filed a revised motion for class certification. On February 1, 2010, the
court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants as to all claims, other than a
lights claim involving another cigarette manufacturer. On February 22, 2010, the court
denied plaintiffs motion for class certification as to each purported class of plaintiffs,
but, allowed plaintiffs an opportunity to reinstate the motion
 9




---



##### 



as to the conspiracy claim, if a new class representative was identified by April 10, 2010.
Plaintiffs have now filed a Fourth Amended Complaint in an attempt to resurrect their
addiction claims. The court is scheduled to rule on defendants motion to dismiss that
claim on or before June 9, 2010.In Re: Tobacco Litigation (Personal Injury Cases), Case No. 00-C-5000, Circuit
Court, West Virginia, Ohio County (case filed 01/18/00). Although not technically a class
action, the court consolidated approximately 750 individual smoker actions that were pending
prior to 2001 for trial on some common related issues. Liggett was severed from trial of
the consolidated action. Trial commenced on February 1, 2010, however, a mistrial was
granted due to the inability to seat a jury. Trial was continued until June 1, 2010.Parsons, et al. v. A C & S Inc., et al., Case No. 98-C-388, Circuit Court, West
Virginia, Kanawha County (case filed 04/09/98). This personal injury class action is
brought on behalf of plaintiffs decedent and all West Virginia residents who allegedly have
personal injury claims arising from their exposure to cigarette smoke and asbestos fibers.
The case is stayed as a result of the December 2000 bankruptcy petitions filed by three
defendants in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.Schwab [McLaughlin], et al. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., et al., Case No.
04-cv-01945, USDC, Eastern District of New York (case filed 05/11/04). This class action
sought economic damages on behalf of plaintiffs and all others similarly situated under the
RICO act challenging the practices of defendants in connection with the marketing,
advertising, promotion, distribution and sale of light cigarettes. In September 2006, the
court certified a nationwide class of light smokers. The defendants appealed the
certification and, in April 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
decertified the class. The case was remanded to the district court. The defendants have
until May 4, 2010 to answer the plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint. In April 2009,
plaintiffs in 11 lights class actions, including Schwab, moved to consolidate these 11
actions in a Multidistrict Litigation entitled In Re: Light Cigarettes Product Liability
Litigation. The motion, as to consolidation of the Schwabcase, was denied by the court in
September 2009.Young, et al. v. American Brands Inc., et al., Case No. 97-19984cv, Civil District
Court, Louisiana, Orleans Parish (case filed 11/12/97). This purported personal injury
class action is brought on behalf of plaintiff and all similarly situated residents in
Louisiana who, though not themselves cigarette smokers, have been exposed to secondhand
smoke from cigarettes which were manufactured by the defendants, and who suffered injury as
a result of that exposure. The plaintiffs seek to recover an unspecified amount of
compensatory and punitive damages. In October 2004, the trial court stayed this case
pending the outcome of the appeal in Scott v. American Tobacco Co.For more information on
the Scottcase, see Note 5. Contingencies.
 Price Fixing
 Smith, et al. v. Philip Morris, Inc., et al., Case No. 00-cv-26, District Court,
Kansas, Seward County (case filed 02/07/00). In this class action, plaintiffs allege that
defendants conspired to fix, raise, stabilize, or maintain prices for cigarettes in Kansas.
The court granted class certification in November 2001 and discovery is proceeding.
 10




---



##### 



III. HEALTH CARE COST RECOVERY ACTIONS
 City of St. Louis, et al. v. American Tobacco Company, Inc., et al., Case No.
cv-982-09652, Circuit Court, Missouri, City of St. Louis (case filed 11/16/98). City of St.
Louis and approximately 40 hospitals (over 50 hospitals originally filed suit, but some have
since dismissed their claims with prejudice) seek to recover past and future costs expended
to provide healthcare to charity and bad debt patients suffering from tobacco-related
illnesses, as well as the increased costs associated with the treatment of all patients,
from multiple defendants including Liggett Group LLC, Liggett & Myers Inc. and Vector Group
Ltd. In June 2005, the court granted defendants motion for summary judgment as to claims
for damages which accrued prior to November 16, 1993. The claims for damages which accrued
after November 16, 1993 are pending. Discovery is proceeding. In September and December
2009, defendants filed motions for summary judgment with respect to plaintiffs claims.
These motions are pending. Trial is scheduled to commence on January 10, 2011.Crow Creek Sioux Tribe v. The American Tobacco Company, et al., Case No.
cv-97-09-082, Tribal Court of the Crow Creek Sioux Tribe, South Dakota (case filed
09/26/97). The plaintiff seeks to recover actual and punitive damages, restitution,
funding of a clinical cessation program, funding of a corrective public education program
and disgorgement of unjust profits from sales to minors. The case is dormant.General Health Services (Kupat Holim Clalit) v. Philip Morris, Inc., et al., Case
No. 1571/98, District Court, Jerusalem, Israel (case filed 09/28/98). General Health
Services seeks to recover the past and future value of the total expenditures for
health-care services provided to residents of Israel resulting from tobacco related disease
along with interest, increased and/or exemplary damages and costs. Motions filed by the
defendants are pending before the Israel Supreme Court, seeking appeal from a lower courts
decision granting leave to plaintiff for foreign service of process. A hearing occurred in
March 2005. A decision is pending.National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, et al. v. Philip Morris
USA, Inc., et al., 08-cv-02021, USDC, Eastern District of New York (case filed
05/20/08). Plaintiffs filed this action pursuant to the Medicare as Secondary Payer statute
to recover for Medicare expenditures made from May 21, 2002 to the present. Defendants
Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment were filed in July
2008. In March 2009, the court granted the Defendants Motion to Dismiss the case. In April
2009, the court denied plaintiffs motion for reconsideration. Plaintiff appealed to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The representative plaintiff passed
away and a motion to substitute a new plaintiff is pending. Additionally, the merits
appeal has been fully briefed. Oral argument is scheduled for the week of May
20, 2010.
 11