alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                          31,103
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,209
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    847,123
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               922,435
<PP&E>                                         283,499
<DEPRECIATION>                                (44,434)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,943,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          201,228
<BONDS>                                        938,355
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,607
<OTHER-SE>                                     771,916
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,943,847
<SALES>                                        708,992
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               935,267
<CGS>                                          573,287
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  653,390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               142,208
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,387
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                114,282
<INCOME-TAX>                                    44,570
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             69,712
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    69,712
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.92
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cr-00257-SAS Document 9 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense; National Defense University.

# ACTION:

Notice of “Open Meeting.”

# SUMMARY:

                        The National Defense University (NDU), Designated Federal Officer, has scheduled a meeting of the Board of Visitors.  Request subject notice be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .  The National Defense University Board of Visitors is a Federal Advisory Board.  The Board meets twice a year in proceedings that are open to the public.                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on November 19-20, 2007 from 11:00 to 17:00 on the 19th and continuing on the 20th from 8:30 to 13:30.

*Location:*                         The Board of Visitors meeting will be held at Building 62, Marshall Hall, Room 155, National Defense University, 300 5th Avenue, Fort McNair, Washington, DC 20319-5066.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The point of contact for this notice of an “Open Meeting” is Jeanette Tolbert at (202) 685-3955, Fax (202) 685-3328 or                         *TolbertJ@ndu.edu*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

State of the University, National Security Professional Development, Accreditation, and Federal Policy.  The meeting is open to the public; limited space is made available for observers and will be allocated on a first-come, first-serve basis.

Dated: October 17, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.

[FR Doc. 07-5217 Filed 10-22-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

QUEEN MILLER,

Appellant,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00039-MP-WCS

EDNY SAINT FELIX,

Appellee.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Appellee's motion for a 7-day extension of time to file

a response to Appellant's Brief. The motion is granted, and Appellee shall file a response by

March 16, 2010.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of March, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2011 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to reduce the credit hour requirement 

for the Edith Nourse Rogers STEM Scholarship program of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 27, 2019 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. MANCHIN, Ms. SINEMA, and Mr. 

CRUZ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to reduce the credit 

hour requirement for the Edith Nourse Rogers STEM 

Scholarship program of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veteran STEM Schol5 arship Improvement Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2011 IS

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN CREDIT HOUR REQUIREMENT FOR 

2 EDITH NOURSE ROGERS STEM SCHOLARSHIP. 

3 Section 3320(b)(4)(A)(i) of title 38, United States 

4 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘more than the standard 

5 128 semester (or 192 quarter) credit hours’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘at least the standard 120 semester (or 180 quarter) cred7 it hours’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### JOHNNIE O. BURGESS v. C. G. TATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY.

(Filed 17 March, 1965.)

Appeal and Error § 39—

The burden is on appellant not only to show error but also that the alleged error is prejudicial.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Martin, S. J.,*October 26, 1964 Civil Session of Nash.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover damages for personal injuries which he alleges were caused by ’ defendant’s actionable negligence. On September 1, 1962, defendant, a highway contractor, was engaged in construction work on Highway 64 between Nashville and Rocky Mount. About 11:55 p.m., plaintiff, who was operating a pickup truck, collided with an unlighted barricade which defendant’s employees had placed across that highway at a detour. In the collision, plaintiff was injured and his truck damaged. Issues of negligence, contributory negligence, and damages were submitted to the jury. The verdict established that plaintiff was injured by the negligence of defendant as alleged in the complaint and that plaintiff, by his own *83negligence, contributed to his injuries and damage. From the judgment that he recover nothing, plaintiff appeals, assigning errors in the judge’s charge to the jury.

*William L. Thorp, Jr.; William D. Etheridge for plaintiff.*

*Fields & Cooper for defendant.*

Pek Cuei&m.

We have examined the record and considered each of plaintiff’s assignments of error. We find no error which, in our opinion, affected the verdict. *“*‘Verdicts and judgments are not to be set aside for harmless error or for mere error and no more . . .”’ *Collins v. Lamb,*215 N.C. 719, 720, 2 S.E. 2d 863, 864. The burden is on appellant to show not only that there was error in the trial but also that there is a reasonable probability that “the result was materially affected thereby to his hurt.”' *Garland v. Penegar,*235 N.C. 517, 519, 70 S.E. 2d 486, 488. We find no reason to disturb the result of the trial.

No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-QSB FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE 
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,754,758
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,877,426
<PP&E>                                       2,049,756
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,061,119
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,776,739
<BONDS>                                        842,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       139,188
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,261,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,061,119
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,158,748
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,050,130
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             288,306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,304,830
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,304,830
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,304,830
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1992 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 168
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1992

         To amend the FAST Act to repeal a rescission of funds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 26, 2019

  Mr. Barrasso (for himself, Mr. Carper, Mrs. Capito, and Mr. Cardin) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

                             July 31, 2019

              Reported by Mr. Barrasso, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To amend the FAST Act to repeal a rescission of funds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF RESCISSION.

    (a) In General.--Section 1438 of the FAST Act (Public Law 114-94; 
129 Stat. 1432) is repealed.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents in section 1(b) of 
the FAST Act (Public Law 114-94; 129 Stat. 1312) is amended by striking 
the item relating to section 1438.
                                                       Calendar No. 168

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1992

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

         To amend the FAST Act to repeal a rescission of funds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 31, 2019

                       Reported without amendment
```
**EXHIBIT 99.1**
ANNUAL SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE
BARCLAYS BANK PLC
GRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 4) PLC
     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Barclay Bank PLC (the “Bank”), asServicer, pursuant to the Beneficiaries Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 23, 1999 ( the“Agreement”), among the Bank, as Servicer and Barclaycard Funding PLC, as Investor Beneficiary,does hereby certify that:
     1. The Bank is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective meanings asset forth in the Agreement.
     2. The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate.
     3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar year ended December 31, 2004 was conducted under my supervision.
     4. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreementthroughout such calendar year and no material default in the performance ofsuch obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in theParagraph 5 below.
     5. The following is a description of each material default in the performanceof the Servicer’s obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known tothe undersigned to have been made by the Servicer during the calendar yearended December 31, 2004, which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each suchdefault, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each suchdefault and (iii) the current status of each such default:
None.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Annual Servicer’s Certificate this30th day of June, 2005.       Barclays Bank PLC
#### STATE v. HEAD

No. 101 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 592.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-81 denied 6 April 1976. Appeal dismissed 6 April 1976.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

      ( print page 56074)    

# ACTION:

 Notice of partially open meeting of the Board of Directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

# TIME AND PLACE:

 Thursday, October 4, 2007 at 9:30 a.m. The meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.

# OPEN AGENDA ITEM:

 Medium-Term Delegated Authority Program (MTDAP).

# PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:

 The meeting will be open to public participation for Item No. 1 only.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 For further information, contact: Office of the Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571 (Telephone 202-565-3957).

Howard A. Schweitzer

General Counsel

[FR Doc. 07-4892 Filed 9-28-07; 1:17 pm]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
#### STATE v. JOYNER

No. 73 PC.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 129.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 12 January 1982.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket Nos. 45088/45089

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

TORY ALLEN HOWARD,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2018 Unpublished Opinion No. 446

Filed: May 14, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Bannock County. Hon. Robert C. Naftz, District Judge. 

Judgments of conviction and consecutive unified sentences of twenty-two years, 

with a minimum period of confinement of seven years, for delivery of a controlled 

substance and twenty-eight years, with a minimum period of confinement of eight 

years, for trafficking in heroin, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W. Reynolds, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

In consolidated cases, Tory Allen Howard was found guilty of one count of delivery of a 

controlled substance, Idaho Code § 37-2732(a)(1)(A), and trafficking in heroin, I.C. § 37-

2732B(a)(6)(A), both with persistent violator enhancements, I.C. § 19-2514. The district court 

imposed a unified sentence of twenty-two years, with a minimum period of confinement of seven 

years, for delivery and twenty-eight years, with a minimum period of confinement of eight years,
2

for trafficking. The sentences were ordered to run consecutively. Howard appeals, contending 

that his sentences are excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Howard’s judgments of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

STANLEY DELORD MARTIN,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No.: 3:10cv28/MCR/EMT

WALTER McNEIL, 

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER

This matter is before the court on Petitioner’s motion for leave to amend his petition for writ

of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 11).

Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, “a party may amend the party’s

pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served . . .” In the

instant case, although service of the petition on Respondent has been directed (see Doc. 10),

Respondent has not yet served a responsive pleading; therefore, Petitioner is entitled to amend the

petition. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Petitioner’s motion for leave to amend his habeas petition (Doc. 11) is GRANTED.

2. The court’s previous order (Doc. 10) directing Respondent to file a response to the

original habeas petition is VACATED. Respondent shall not respond to the amended petition until

ordered to do so by the court. 

3. The clerk shall provide Petitioner a petition form for use in habeas cases filed under

§ 2254. This case number shall be written on the form.

4. Within SIXTY (60) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order, Petitioner shall

file an amended petition on the court-approved form. Additionally, Petitioner shall provide two (2)

service copies of the amended petition, any attachments thereto, and any supporting memorandum.
Page 2 of 2

5. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this action for failure to

comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 31 day of March 2010. st

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No: 3:10cv28/MCR/EMT
Exhibit 23.1 

 

> **MSI

Staley, Okada          & Partners          Chartered Accountants

3rd Floor,          10190 152A Street          Surrey, BC Canada          V3R 1J7          Phone: (604) 585-8300          Fax: (604) 585-8377          info@staleyokada.com          www.staleyokada.com

**Clean Energy Combustion Systems, Inc.**
****Independent  Auditors' Consent
 

We consent  to the inclusion and use of our report dated March 12, 2003, with respect to  the consolidated financial statements of Clean Energy of Clean Energy  Combustion Systems, Inc. in that corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for  its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.

/s/ *Staley, Okada & Partners*     
Surrey, British Columbia, Canada14 April      2003
STALEY, OKADA & PARTNERS      CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS******
**** **Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Skye International, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas
      Kreitzer, Chief Executive Officer
      and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







|                                |                                                                                    |                                
|------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------
|                                |                                                                                   
|                                |                                                                                    |                                
|Date: June
            30, 2006 | By:                                                                                | /s/ Thomas
            Kreitzer
|                                | Thomas
            Kreitzer                                                       
|                                | Title: Chief
            Executive Officer and Chief Financial
            Officer