alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1  Section 906 Certificate  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Luxfer Holdings PLC, a public limited company incorporated under English law (the company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:  The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the Form 20-F) of the company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.   Date: March 15,   2016

/s/ Brian Gordon PurvesBrian Gordon PurvesChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32



                                CERTIFICATION OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, the undersigned, Richard Frockt, who
is the President of Lincoln International Corporation (the "Company"), and
Kenneth S. Berryman, who is the Treasurer of the Company, hereby certifies that
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31,
2004, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Sec.13(a) or
Sec.15(d) as applicable, of the Securities Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                              /s/ RICHARD FROCKT
                                              -----------------------------
                                              Name:  Richard Frockt
                                              Title: President
                                              Date:  July 14, 2004


                                              /s/ KENNETH S. BERRYMAN
                                              -----------------------------
                                              Name:  Kenneth S. Berryman
                                              Title: Treasurer
                                              Date:  July 14, 2004
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, the undersigned officer of Vision Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated March 18, 2005



By:

/s/ William E. BlackmonWilliam E. Blackmon,Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of William Lyon Homes (the Company) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Grubbs, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/    MICHAEL D. GRUBBS

---

Michael D. Grubbs

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial

Officer and Treasurer

July 14, 2004



A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to William Lyon Homes and will be retained by William Lyon Homes and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION

I, Derek L. Caldwell, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lincoln International
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

                                                    /s/ DEREK L. CALDWELL
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Name:  Derek L. Caldwell
                                                   Title: President
                                                   Date:  July 22, 2005
The Football Association Premier League Limited et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al Doc. 109

Dockets.Justia.com
**EXHIBIT 10.43**

 

**DESCRIPTION OF 2006 CASH BONUS PLAN**

 

On February 23, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board ofDirectors approved the 2006 Cash Bonus Plan (the “2006 Plan”) for all of its full-time, salaried employees, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Chief Operating Officer (“COO”), Executive Vice President(“EVP”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”). ****Under the terms of the 2006 Plan, the CEO and COO are eligible to receive bonuses of three percent of the Company’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income, the EVP is eligible toreceive a bonus based on 3% of the Northern California Regions pre-tax, pre-bonus income after corporate allocation and  3/4 of1% of the Company’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income (excluding the Northern California Region) and the CFO is eligible to receive a bonus based on a specified percentage of the Company’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income. Region presidents are eligibleto receive bonuses based upon specified percentages of their respective region pre-tax, pre-bonus income after corporate allocation, the president of the Company’s mortgage subsidiary is eligible to receive a bonus based upon the mortgagesubsidiary’s pre-tax, pre-bonus income if the mortgage subsidiary achieves a targeted profit amount, a targeted mortgage capture rate (subject to adjustment upward or downward if actual performance is above or below the target) and a targetedcustomer service score (subject to adjustment upward or downward if actual performance is above or below the target), and all other participants are eligible to receive bonuses based upon specified percentages of salary or specified percentages of abonus pool determined as a specified percentage of pre-tax, pre-bonus income. 

 

An employee’s right to receive a bonus under the 2006 Plan is generally conditioned upon his or her being actively employed by the Company or its divisions or subsidiaries on the date of payment. Awards will bepaid over two years, with 75% paid following the determination of the bonus awards, and 25% paid one year later, except for administrative staff bonuses and mortgage subsidiary bonuses which will be paid in full. The amounts payable one year laterare conditioned upon continued employment to the date of payment, except in the case of retirement, death or disability. 

 

The maximum aggregate amount of awards under the 2006 Plan will not exceed 20% of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax income before bonuses.

 

The Compensation Committee retains the discretion to increasethe bonus of a participant in the event of an extraordinary performance, or decrease it in the case of a substandard performance, and may make this determination on the basis of objective or subjective criteria, including, but not limited to, thepay levels of executives at other major homebuilders.
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |                         | Franchise      Holdings International, Inc.   |   |
|---------------------------|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      April 24, 2009 | By:                          | /s/ A.      J. Boisdrenghien                       |   |
|                      | A.      J. Boisdrenghien     |                                                    |
|                      | Chief      Executive Officer |                                                    |
|                      | Chief      Financial Officer |                                                    |
EXHIBIT 32.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Global Entertainment Holdings/Equities,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, on the date
hereof, the undersigned, Bryan Abboud, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC 1350, as adopted pursuant to 18 U.S.C,
Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                     /s/ Bryan Abboud
Dated: September 2, 2005                            -----------------------
                                                     Bryan Abboud
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent as shall be expressly set forth by
specific reference in such filing.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SHERRIE RUSSELL-BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00257-MP-AK

ROBERT H JERRY, II, LEVIN COLLEGE OF LAW, THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, THE

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Motion to Strike by Sherrie Russell-Brown, Doc. 91. 

In the Motion to Strike, Plaintiffs request several of Defendants’ attorney-time records be

stricken from the record. Plaintiffs allege the time records in question are untimely filed,

insufficiently specific, mis-titled, and otherwise scandalous. 

In response, Defendants explain how, because attorneys’ fees are an element of damages

on the counterclaims, evidence of Defendants’ attorneys’ fees and costs will necessarily need to

be introduced into evidence at trial on the counterclaims. Thus, Defendants argue, the filings in

question fall outside of the motions for attorney’s fees covered by Local Rule 54.1(A), which

describes the time for filing a motion for an award of attorney’s fees. In reply, Plaintiff takes

exception to some of the specific characteristics of the records themselves, noting how in her

opinion the records do not match with particular fidelity the history of the present litigation. 

Defendants are correct that the documents in question now are not a “motion for an

award of attorney’s fees” within the meaning of Local Rule 54.1(A). This is, however, a

“proceeding in which any party is seeking an award of attorney’s fees from the opposing party

Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP-AK Document 117 Filed 07/29/10 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:09-cv-00257-MP-AK

pursuant to... contract....” Therefore, Defendants must be sure to comply with the recordkeeping requirements of Local Rule 54.1(B). Should they fail to do so, one of the remedies the

Court may consider is to discount the improperly-recorded fees or hours, but that remedy is not

appropriate at this time. Motion to Strike, Doc. 91, is DENIED. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of July, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP-AK Document 117 Filed 07/29/10 Page 2 of 2
Are Your Guards Creating Hazards?

18,000 

days lost

Each year more than 400 miners miss an average of 

45 days from work due to improperly designed 

machine guards. That’s over 18,000 days a year lost!* 

* Data based on an analysis by NIOSH researchers of all injuries reported to MSHA 

 between 2004 and 2012 with the source of injury identified as metal covers and guards. 

Design the hazard out of the guard!

Design guards so 

they don’t need to be 

removed for inspections. 

Design guards in small, 

lightweight sections for 

easy removal by one person. 

Paint the guards a single 

bright color that contrasts 

with the surrounding 

area to make them 

easier to see.

Add handles or handholds 

to improve grip.

Illustrations by NIOSH

Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health

October 2020

Disclaimer: Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by the 

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Case 1:07-cv-03430-BSJ-AJP Document 14 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03430-BSJ-AJP Document 14 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. KIMBRELL

No. 370P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 372.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 August 1982.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      10,973,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               84,027,000<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                121,091,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           242,187,000
<PP&E>                                     169,986,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              34,602,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             486,530,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      100,803,000
<BONDS>                                    166,933,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       32,900,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,822,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 142,233,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               152,055,000
<SALES>                                    255,823,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           255,823,000
<CGS>                                      174,379,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              245,395,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,616,000<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,071,816
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,812,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,334,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,478,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,688,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     $ 0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   $ 0.20
<FN>
<F1>Net of Allowances
<F2>Includes equity in income of other operations to be disposed of, ($890,000).
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.2



AMENDMENT TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”), dated March 20, 2020 (the “Effective Date”), to the Employment Agreement, dated February 20, 2017 (the “Employment Agreement”), between KGH Intermediate Holdco II, LLC (the “Company”), and Phung Ngo-Burns, an individual (the “Employee”), is made and entered into by and among the Company and the Employee (each a “Party” and collectively the “Parties”).
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement to provide for Compensation Committee evaluation and adjustment from time to time of salary, similar to comparable NexTier executives; and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth herein, effective as of the Effective Date.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and conditions set forth herein, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
		
	1.
	Effective as of the Effective Date, a new sentence is added to the end of Section 3(a) to read as follows:


“The Base Salary will be subject to review at least annually by the Compensation Committee for increase, but not decrease below the amount set forth in this Section 3(a).” 
		
	2.
	Unless otherwise defined in this Amendment, terms used in this Amendment which are defined in the Employment Agreement shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Employment Agreement.  Except as specifically provided for in this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.  This Amendment and the Employment Agreement shall be read and construed as one instrument. From and after the Effective Date, each reference in the Employment Agreement, including the schedules and exhibits thereto and the other documents delivered in connection therewith, to the “Employment Agreement,” “this Agreement,” “hereunder,” “hereof,” “herein,” or words of like import, shall mean and be a reference to the Employment Agreement as amended by the Amendment. The provisions set forth in Section 9. Other Provisions of the Employment Agreement shall apply to this Amendment or as applicable, the Employment Agreement as amended by this Amendment, mutatis mutandis.


		
	3.
	This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.  By signing where indicated below you agree to the terms and conditions hereof.




[Signatures on Next Page]


	
		
	 
	 

	Phung Ngo-Burns

	 
	 

	 
	 /s/ Phung Ngo-Burns

	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	KGH Intermediate Holdco II, LLC

	 
	 

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Kenneth Pucheu

	Name:
	Kenneth Pucheu

	Title:
	Chief Financial Officer




 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Employment Agreement as of the date first above written.
#### AMERICAN FOODS, INC. v. FARMS, INC.

No. 107 PC.

No. 52 (Fall Term).

Case below: 50 N.C. App. 591.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 June 1981. Motion of plaintiff to dismiss defendant’s appeal as to all issues except that addressed by the dissenting opinion allowed 2 June 1981, and petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 June 1981.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CHARLES LITCHFIELD,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 1:09cv264-SPM/GRJ

PORTFOLIO RECOVERY

ASSOCIATES, LLC., 

Defendant.

_________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case has been dismissed with prejudice and with each party to bear

its own fees and costs, pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal with

Prejudice (doc. 14) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii). Accordingly,

the clerk shall close this case.

SO ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                  ------------



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Marc S. Hermelin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.




Date: June 27, 2008                               /s/ Marc S. Hermelin
                                          -------------------------------------
                                                    Marc S. Hermelin
                                          Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)