alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011199EN.01001301.xml

| 7.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/13

---

Corrigendum to Commission opinion concerning a notice of initiation of an anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof originating in India

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 142 of 13 May 2011
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 142 of 13 May 2011

2011/C 199/08

As regards the title of the act,

for:

read:

---
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |                         | Franchise      Holdings International, Inc.  |
|---------------------------|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
| Date:      April 29, 2009 | By:                          | /s/ A.      J. Boisdrenghien                 |
|                      | A.      J. Boisdrenghien     |
|                      | Chief      Executive Officer |
|                      | Chief      Financial Officer |
Case 1:07-cv-03522-PKC     Document 5      Filed 05/07/2007     Page 1 of 1
# C_2011060EN.01000701.xml

| 25.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/7

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 60/03

| Date of adoption of the decision | 12.10.2010 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | N 97/10 |
| Member State | France |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Mesure de réduction du coût d’usage de la musique en ligne |
| Legal basis | Projet de décret relatif à la «Carte musique» |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Sectoral development |
| Form of aid | Transactions not on market terms |
| Budget | | Annual budget: EUR 25 million |

Date of adoption of the decision

12.10.2010

Reference number of State Aid

N 97/10

Member State

France

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Mesure de réduction du coût d’usage de la musique en ligne

Legal basis

Projet de décret relatif à la «Carte musique»

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Sectoral development

Form of aid

Transactions not on market terms

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 25 million

| | Overall budget: EUR 75 million |
| --- | --- |

Overall budget: EUR 75 million

Intensity

50 %

Duration (period)

Until 25.10.2012

Economic sectors

Media

Name and address of the granting authority

| Ministère de la Culture et de la communication |
| --- |
| 3 rue de Valois |
| 75033 Paris Cedex 01 |
| FRANCE |

Ministère de la Culture et de la communication

3 rue de Valois

75033 Paris Cedex 01

FRANCE

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

| Date of adoption of the decision | 11.1.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | N 498/10 |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Film production in South Tyrol |
| Legal basis | Legge provinciale n. 66/2010 |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Culture |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | | Annual budget: EUR 5 million |

Date of adoption of the decision

11.1.2011

Reference number of State Aid

N 498/10

Member State

Italy

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Film production in South Tyrol

Legal basis

Legge provinciale n. 66/2010

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Culture

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 5 million

| | Overall budget: EUR 15 million |
| --- | --- |

Overall budget: EUR 15 million

Intensity

80 %

Duration (period)

1.1.2011-31.12.2013

Economic sectors

Media

Name and address of the granting authority

Provincia autonoma di Bolzano

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7**  **533**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , P laintiff

- Appell ee ,
v. JERMOL CHIN , Defendant

- Appell ant .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Mar yland , at Baltimore
. William D. Quarles, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:06

- cr - 00552

- WDQ

- 1; 1:10

- cv - 02093

- WDQ )

Submitted : January 18, 2011 Decided: January 28, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Jermol Chin , Appellant Pro Se. Debra Lynn Dwyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jermol Chin seeks to appeal the district cou rt’s order treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28
U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28
U.S .C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) ; Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court de nies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Mil ler

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denia l of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Chin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.3 Additionally, we con strue Chin ’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive
§ 2255 motion. United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisone r must assert claims based on either: (1) newly discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would hav e found the movant guilty of the offense; or (2) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review. 28 U.S.C. A. § 22 55(h ) (West Supp. 2010)
. Chin ’s claims do not satisfy either o f these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to fi le a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisio nal
process. DISMISSED
#### HARRIS v. HODGES

No. 357P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 360.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 July 1982.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Rahoul Sharan, the Chief Financial Officer of One Voice
Technologies, Inc., certify that:


1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of One Voice
Technologies, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions
         about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
         of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
         evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
         registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
         quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
         or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting.



July 1, 2005



/s/ Rahoul Sharan
------------------
Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    
    /s/
John B. Gerlach, Jr.John B. Gerlach, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerMay 10, 2007By:
    
    /s/ John L. BoylanJohn L. BoylanChief Financial OfficerMay 10, 2007
 27
Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-7 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-7 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-7 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-7 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 4 of 4
#### LUMBER CO. v. BROOKS, COMR. OF LABOR

No. 22PC

Case below: 50 NC App 294

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 April 1981. Motion of Comr. of Labor to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 7 April 1981.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2003 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2003

To require the Federal Communications Commission to designate a 3-digit 
                  dialing code for veterans in crisis.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 2019

  Mr. Manchin (for himself, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Tester, Mr. Cramer, Mr. 
Blumenthal, and Mr. Sullivan) introduced the following bill; which was 
  read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Federal Communications Commission to designate a 3-digit 
                  dialing code for veterans in crisis.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Suicide Prevention by Eliminating 
Excessive Digits Act of 2019'' or the ``SPEED Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF 3-DIGIT DIALING CODE FOR VETERANS IN CRISIS.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``Commission'' means the Federal 
        Communications Commission; and
            (2) the term ``covered dialing code'' means a simple, easy-
        to-remember, 3-digit dialing code.
    (b) Designation.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Commission, in consultation with the 
Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use and the 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall designate a covered dialing code 
that veterans may use to reach a national suicide prevention and mental 
health crisis hotline system, which system may be--
            (1) the Veterans Crisis Line;
            (2) the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline; or
            (3) another hotline.
    (c) Incorporation of Study Findings.--
            (1) In general.--In designating a covered dialing code 
        under subsection (b), the Commission shall incorporate the 
        findings of the study conducted under section 3(a) of the 
        National Suicide Hotline Improvement Act of 2018 (Public Law 
        115-233; 132 Stat. 2424).
            (2) Prioritizing implementation speed.--Nothing in 
        paragraph (1) shall be construed to authorize the Commission to 
        delay the designation of a covered dialing code under 
        subsection (b) until after the Commission submits the report 
        under section 3(b) of the National Suicide Hotline Improvement 
        Act of 2018 (Public Law 115-233; 132 Stat. 2424).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1 

 

Independent Auditor’s Consent

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

Nutri/System, Inc. 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-44908) on Form S-8 of Nutri/System, Inc. of our report dated February10, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Nutri/System, Inc as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operation, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2002, which reportappears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Nutri/System, Inc. 

 

Our report dated February 10, 2003 on the consolidated financial statements of Nutri/System, Inc. contains an explanatory paragraph that the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwilland Other Intangible Assets,” as of January 1, 2002. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 17, 2003
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of William Lyon Homes (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Grubbs, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/    MICHAEL D. GRUBBS

---

Michael D. Grubbs

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial

Officer and Treasurer

March 11, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to William Lyon Homes and will be retained by William Lyon Homes and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       UT
<CIK> 0000055387
<NAME> KENTUCKY UTILITIES COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                    PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                         1,560,139
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          14,575
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                              147,373
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             54,866
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1,776,953
<COMMON>                                            307,545 <F1>
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                 0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                 324,080
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                      631,625
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                          40,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                430,830
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                        0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                            0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       115,500
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                 0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                               0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                          0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                      558,998
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                     1,776,953
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                           217,778
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                 11,366
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                          177,659
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                          189,025
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                              28,753
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                    1,325
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                       30,078
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              9,904
<NET-INCOME>                                         20,174
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             564
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                        19,610
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             25,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                             8,735
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                               37,369
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
<FN>
<F1>Includes common stock expense of $595.
</FN>



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         21,394,149
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12,994,185
<ALLOWANCES>                                   204,987
<INVENTORY>                                    22,079,932
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               59,480,101
<PP&E>                                         31,987,659
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (16,826,117)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 77,956,863
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          17,082,607
<BONDS>                                        4,402,222
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,410
<COMMON>                                       183,083
<OTHER-SE>                                     53,759,493
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   77,956,863
<SALES>                                        79,097,246
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               80,174,432
<CGS>                                          43,306,435
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  20,782,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               124,575
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               68,528
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             331,857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                15,560,187
<INCOME-TAX>                                   5,907,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            9,652,687
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   9,652,687
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .48
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. BYRD

No. 55.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 718.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 March 1975. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 March 1975.
EXHIBIT
(32)




CERTIFICATION
OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS*




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, each of the undersigned officers of La-Z-Boy
Incorporated (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that
the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 23,
2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Kurt L. DarrowKurt
      L. DarrowPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerNovember
      23, 2010/s/ Louis M. Riccio, Jr.Louis
      M. Riccio, Jr.Senior
      Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerNovember
      23, 2010




*The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 27-27      Filed 05/22/2008     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 27-27      Filed 05/22/2008     Page 2 of 2