alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       498
<OTHER-SE>                                    (498)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              8000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (8000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
#### CALDWELL v. REALTY CO.

No. 129 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 676.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1977.
#### HENDERSON v. HENDERSON

No. 100PA82.

Case below: 55 N.C. App. 506.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 13 July 1982.
#### DRUMMOND v. DRUMMOND

No. 147 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 240.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1977.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the amended Annual Report of Expedia, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the
period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Erik C. Blachford, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: April     , 2003 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    ERIK C.
BLACHFORD                                                             
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Erik C. Blachford President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



[A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Expedia, Inc., and will be retained by Expedia, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

04-20-00404-CV

IN RE Aaron Michael COOK

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena Chapa, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 19, 2020

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On August 12, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the 

petition and the record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, 

the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019EM501414, styled In the Interest of B.M.C., a Child, pending in the 

438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. The Honorable Norma Gonzales signed the order at issue in this 

original proceeding.
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 3 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 3 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 3 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 3 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 3 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 5 of 5
#### ACCEPTANCE CORP. v. FEDER

No. 82 PC.

Case below: 12 N. C. App. 696.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 14 January 1972.
#### STATE v. BOZEMAN

No. 65 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 404.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 March 1976.
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   6-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-2000
[PERIOD-END]                               JUN-30-2000
[CASH]                                       1,453,292
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                        0
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                             1,757,292
[PP&E]                                         910,983
[DEPRECIATION]                                (72,716)
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                               2,665,513
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                           18,763
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                       858,170
[OTHER-SE]                                   1,788,680
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                 2,685,513
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                     0
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                             1,106,543
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                              24,095
[INCOME-PRETAX]                            (1,022,371)
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                        (1,022,371)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                               (1,022,371)
[EPS-BASIC]                                     (0.06)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                   (0.06)
</TABLE>
II 

116TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 2173 

To amend title 14, United States Code, to enhance the land-based unmanned 

aircraft system program of the Coast Guard, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 18, 2019 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida (for himself, Ms. SINEMA, and Mr. YOUNG) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend title 14, United States Code, to enhance the 

land-based unmanned aircraft system program of the 

Coast Guard, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coast Guard Drug De5 tection and Interdiction Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LAND-BASED UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM PRO7 GRAM OF THE COAST GUARD. 

8 (a) FUNDING FOR CERTAIN ENHANCED CAPABILI9 TIES.—Section 319 of title 14, United States Code, is 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2173 IS

1 amended by adding at the end the following new sub2 section: 

3 ‘‘(c) FUNDING FOR CERTAIN ENHANCED CAPABILI4 TIES.—In each of fiscal years 2020 and 2021, the Com5 mandant may provide additional funding for the land6 based unmanned aircraft system program in amounts, and 

7 for purposes, as follows: 

8 ‘‘(1) $2,000,000 in each fiscal year for assess9 ment of the expanded use of medium range un10 manned aircraft systems within the program. 

11 ‘‘(2) $5,000,000 in each fiscal year for addi12 tional long-range maritime patrol aircraft (MPA) 

13 within the program.’’. 

14 (b) REPORT ON USE OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYS15 TEMS FOR CERTAIN SURVEILLANCE.— 

16 (1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than March 

17 31, 2021, the Commandant of the Coast Guard shall 

18 submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a 

19 report setting forth an assessment of the feasibility 

20 and advisability of using unmanned aircraft systems 

21 (UAS) for surveillance of marine protected areas, 

22 the transit zone, and the Arctic in order to— 

23 (A) establish and maintain regular mari24 time domain awareness of such areas; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 2173 IS

1 (B) ensure appropriate response to illegal 

2 activities in such areas; and 

3 (C) collaborate with State, local, and tribal 

4 authorities, and international partners, in sur5 veillance missions over their waters in such 

6 areas. 

7 (2) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS

8 DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘appro9 priate committees of Congress’’ means— 

10 (A) the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

11 and Transportation and the Committee on 

12 Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

13 of the Senate; and 

14 (B) the Committee on Transportation and 

15 Infrastructure and the Committee on Homeland 

16 Security of the House of Representatives. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 13.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 (Section 906) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Pemex Finance Limited (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Ricardo Fernández DelgadoRicardo Fernández DelgadoPresident




Dated: June 30, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Pemex Finance Limited and will be retained by Pemex Finance Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### IN RE HUBER

No. 399P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 453.

Petition by Hazelwood for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 Denied 3 August 1982. Motion by Guardian ad Litem and Mecklenburg County DSS to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 3 August 1982.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 24 (Tuesday, February 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 5452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-494]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, Molecular Toxicology of DNA 
Adducts.
    Date: February 23, 2007.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Radisson Governor's Inn, I-40 at Davis Drive, Exit 
280, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
    Contact Person: Teresa Nesbitt, BS, PhD, DVM, Chief, Scientific 
Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research and Training, Nat'l 
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-
30, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, (919) 541-7571, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6f010a1c0d061b1b2f020e06034101060741080019"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="91fff4e2f3f8e5e5d1fcf0f8fdbffff8f9bff6fee7">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.115, 
Biometry and Risk Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental 
Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety 
Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic 
Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower Development 
in the Environmental Health Sciences; 93.113, Biological Response to 
Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied Toxicological Research 
and Testing, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 28, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-494 Filed 2-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 1 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 2 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 3 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 4 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 5 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 6 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 7 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 8 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 9 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 10 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 11 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 12 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 13 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 14 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 15 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 16 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 17 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 18 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 19 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 20 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 21 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 22 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 23 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 24 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 25 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 26 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 27 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 28 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 29 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 30 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 31 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 32 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 33 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 34 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 35 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 36 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 37 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 38 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 1 Filed 05/04/07 Page 39 of 39
| Name of Subsidiary                                                     |   | Jurisdiction of Incorporationor Organization |   | Percentage ofOwnership |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|--------|
| Xi`an Hua Long Yu Tian Scientific and Technological Industry Co., Ltd. |   | PRC                                                    |   |                   | 100    | % |
| New Century Scientific Investment  Ltd.                      |   | PRC                                                    |   |                   | 95     | % |
| Xi`an Jiaoda Bao Sai Bio-Technology Co., Ltd.                          |   | PRC                                                    |   |                   | 96.77  | % |

----
#### GOWER v. INSURANCE CO.

No. 16 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 368.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 7 March 1972.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DR. DARIOUS ALX-JACOBS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv29-SPM/WCS

TRUST FUND ADMINISTRATION,

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before me upon referral from the Clerk. In an order filed February

5, 2010, Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint by March 5, 2010. Plaintiff

was specifically warned that a recommendation would be made that this case be

dismissed if there was a failure to comply with that order. Doc. 7. To date, no response

has been received from the Plaintiff. 

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failure to obey a

court order. Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 838 and cases cited (11th Cir.), cert.
Page 2 of 2

denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989). Since Plaintiff has failed to comply with an order or to

prosecute this case, this complaint should now be dismissed without prejudice. 

Plaintiff shall have a 14 day period after service of this report and

recommendation in which to file objections. This will also afford Plaintiff a final

opportunity to show good cause for this failure to respond. Plaintiff may do so by filing a

motion for reconsideration which will be referred to me by the Clerk.

It is therefore, respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on March 18, 2010.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within

14 days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. A party may respond to

another party's objections within 14 days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific

objections limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:10cv29-SPM/WCS
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lannett Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Arthur P. Bedrosian, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Keith R. Ruck, the Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report complies with the requirementsof Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  February 11, 2010 | /s/Arthur  P. Bedrosian                               |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |                                                  |
|                           | Arthur  P. Bedrosian,                                 |
|                           | President  and Chief Executive Officer                |
|                           |                                                  |
|                           |                                                  |
| Dated:  February 11, 2010 | /s/Keith  R. Ruck                                     |
|                           |                                                  |
|                           | Keith  R. Ruck,                                       |
|                           | Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----