alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 156 Filed 03/04/2010 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 156 Filed 03/04/2010 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 156 Filed 03/04/2010 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 156 Filed 03/04/2010 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 156 Filed 03/04/2010 Page 5 of 5
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MINGYU WANG, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-72367 

Agency No. A205-192-796 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Mingyu Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of 

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-72367 

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the 

agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility 

determinations under the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 

1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination 

based on inconsistencies between Wang’s testimony, his declaration, his letters of 

support, and his household register. See id. at 1047-48 (adverse credibility finding 

reasonable under the totality of the circumstances). Wang’s explanations do not 

compel a contrary conclusion. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 

2000). Thus, in the absence of credible testimony, in this case, Wang’s asylum and 

withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 

(9th Cir. 2003). In light of this disposition, we need not reach his remaining 

contentions regarding the merits of his claims. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 

532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (courts and agencies are not required to decide issues 

unnecessary to the results they reach).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Wang’s claim was based on the same testimony the agency found not credible, and 

Wang does not point to any other evidence in the record that compels the 

conclusion that it is more likely than not he would be tortured in China. See

Farah, 348 F.3d at 1157.
3 15-72367 

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 10989 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
BERTON SHAWN PAYNE , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:08

- CR

- 37

- 2

Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Berton Shawn Payne has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Payne h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 17, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-10989 Document: 00512665982 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/17/2014No. 13

- 10989

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-10989 Document: 00512665982 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/17/2014
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

VICKI WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:10-cv-66-SPM/WCS

STATE, et. al,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation (doc. 3). Plaintiff has been mailed a copy and has been

afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code,

Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report

and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 3) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The case is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief

may be granted and because Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee or

submit an in forma pauperis motion.

DONE AND ORDERED this eighteenth day of March, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
Case 1:07-cv-03560-LAK     Document 33      Filed 11/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. 116 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 24.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 May 1976.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY,

successor in interest to COLONIAL BANK by

asset acquisition from the FDIC, as Receiver for

COLONIAL BANK,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 3:10cv10/MCR/EMT

NAVARRE 33, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated May 21, 2012 (doc. 125). The parties have been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. That BB & T’s motion for final summary judgment against Defendants

Navarre 33, Inc., Charles W. Clary, III, William R. McKelvy, and James D. McKelvy (doc.

94) is GRANTED.

3. The court finds no just reason for delay of entry of final judgment against

Defendants Navarre 33, Inc., Charles W. Clary, III, William R. McKelvy, and James D.

McKelvy, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Case 3:10-cv-00010-MCR-EMT Document 133 Filed 06/25/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

4. BB & T is directed to submit calculations of the current balances of the

outstanding indebtedness with principal, accrued interest, late fees and charges, real

estate taxes, and the accrued interest rate within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from the date of

docketing of this order.

5. BB & T is awarded its costs and attorney’s fees incurred in this action in an

amount to be determined by the court.

6. BB & T is directed to file a motion for attorney’s fees, in compliance with rule

54.1 of the Local Rules, within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from the date of docketing of this

order.

7. Upon BB & T’s filing its calculations of the current balances of the outstanding

indebtedness, the clerk is directed to enter final judgment in favor of BB & T and against

Defendants Navarre 33, Inc., Charles W. Clary, III, William R. McKelvy, and James D.

McKelvy, jointly and severally, in that amount.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of June, 2012.

s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:10cv10/MCR/EMT

Case 3:10-cv-00010-MCR-EMT Document 133 Filed 06/25/12 Page 2 of 2
#### PHILLIPS v. PHILLIPS

No. 114 PC.

No. 48 (Spring Term).

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 428.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 24 January 1978.
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 14 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 14 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 14 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 14 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 14 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 14 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 14 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 14 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 14 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 9 of 9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997
<CASH>                                             171
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,179
<ALLOWANCES>                                       149
<INVENTORY>                                     16,339
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,114
<PP&E>                                           4,325
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,805
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,424
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,095
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           156
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,424
<SALES>                                         21,492
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,492
<CGS>                                           16,805
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    70
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,506
<INCOME-TAX>                                       556
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                950
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       950
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 230 (Thursday, December 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 72107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23573]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting

Date and Time: Wednesday, December 7, 2005, 3 p.m.-5 p.m.

Place: Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave., SW., 
Washington, DC 20237.

Closed Meeting: The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors 
(BBG) will meet in closed session to review and discuss a number of 
issues relating to U.S. Government-funded non-military international 
broadcasting. They will address internal procedural, budgetary, and 
personnel issues, as well as sensitive foreign policy issues relating 
to potential options in the U.S. international broadcasting field. This 
meeting is closed because if open it likely would either disclose 
matters that would be properly classified to be kept secret in the 
interest of foreign policy under the appropriate executive order (5 
U.S.C. 552b.(c)(1)) or would disclose information the premature 
disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate 
implementation of a proposed agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(9)(B)) 
In addition, part of the discussion will relate solely to the internal 
personnel and organizational issues of the BBG or the International 
Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(2) and (6))

Contact Person For More Information: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Carol Booker at (202) 203-4545.

    Dated: November 28, 2005.
Carol Booker,
Legal Counsel.
[FR Doc. 05-23573 Filed 11-29-05; 2:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | NORTH      AMERICAN GALVANIZING & COATINGS, INC.(Registrant) |                                                                             |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                             |                                                                             |   |
|   | By:                                                              | /s/ Ronald      J. Evans                                                    |   |
|   |                                                             | President      andChief      Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer) |   |
|   |                                                             |                                                                             |   |
|   |                                                             |                                                                             |   |

|                                       |   |                                                                                  |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                       |   |                                                                                  |   |
|                                       | By:    | /s/      Beth B. Hood                                                                 |   |
|                                       |   | Vice      President andChief      Financial Officer(Principal      Financial Officer) |   |
|                                       |   |                                                                                  |   |
| Date:  April      21, 2008  |   |                                                                                  |   |
EXHIBIT
15 – Awareness Letter of Deloitte & Touche LLP










August
27, 2009





North
American Galvanizing & Coatings, Inc.


5314
South Yale Avenue


Suite
1000


Tulsa,
Oklahoma 74135





We have
reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information
of North American Galvanizing & Coatings, Inc. and subsidiary for the
three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, as indicated in our report
dated July 20, 2009; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion
on that information.





We are
aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, is incorporated
by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-133848 on Form S-8 and No.
333-61393 on Form S-3 of North American Galvanizing & Coatings, Inc. (formerly
Kinark Corporation).





We also
are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the
Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement
prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified
by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that
Act.











/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP





Tulsa,
Oklahoma
10 consejos para que los mineros duerman bien

ENTORNO

Limite la exposición a la luz

Limite su exposición a la luz al menos unas cuantas horas antes de dormir. Algunas fuentes comunes de luz 

son el sol, las lámparas y los dispositivos electrónicos. La luz posee un efecto natural de alerta y regula su reloj 

interno. Las persianas de oscurecimiento o bloqueo completo de la luz (blackout) pueden ayudar, en especial 

a los trabajadores del turno de noche que duermen durante el día.

Mantenga la habitación fresca y escoja una cama cómoda

El mantenimiento de una temperatura fresca, pero cómoda en la habitación y el uso de una cama y 

almohadas cómodas son esenciales para dormir bien. Dedique tiempo a buscar el colchón y la almohada 

más adecuados para usted.

Limite las fuentes de ruido

Limite las fuentes de ruidos desiguales y fuertes. Utilice una máquina de ruido blanco para ahogar los 

ruidos de fondo no deseados. Una habitación silenciosa mejora la calidad del sueño.

SALUD

Duerma entre 7 y 9 horas

Planee dormir entre 7 y 9 horas de manera constante para lo cual deberá programar la hora de 

acostarse según la hora a la que necesita despertarse. Dormir lo suficiente es importante para tener 

una buena salud del sueño.

Evite comidas grandes antes de acostarse

Evite comidas grandes o pesadas y alimentos muy condimentados entre 2 y 3 horas antes de acostarse. El 

consumo de este tipo de comidas antes de acostarse puede causar dificultad para conciliar el sueño y 

para mantenerse dormido.

Haga ejercicio con regularidad

Incluso caminar y hacer estiramientos ligeros benefician la calidad del sueño y la salud general. También

mejora el estado de alerta.

¿Usted ronca?

Si bien roncar es común, puede ser un signo de un trastorno del sueño. Hable con su médico si usted 

ronca o tiene otras inquietudes sobre su sueño.

PRODUCTOS DE CONSUMO

Evite la cafeína

Deje de consumir cafeína entre 5 y 6 horas antes de dormir. La cafeína lo puede mantener despierto 

muchas horas después de su consumo. Las fuentes comunes de cafeína comprenden el café, las bebidas 

energizantes y muchos tés y gaseosas.

Evite consumir alcohol

Evite consumir alcohol al menos cuatro horas antes de acostarse. El alcohol dificulta el mantenimiento 

de un sueño de buena calidad a lo largo de la noche.

CHEW

Evite consumir nicotina y productos de tabaco

Evite los productos de nicotina y tabaco antes de acostarse. La nicotina y el tabaco son sustancias 

estimulantes y aumentan la frecuencia cardiaca y el estado de alerta, con lo cual es difícil relajarse y 

prepararse para dormir.
#### STATE v. SHIRLEY

No. 55 PC.

Case below: 12 N.C. App. 440.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 7 December 1971.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             445,081
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,077,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                       621,113
<INVENTORY>                                     19,260,206
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,628,578
<PP&E>                                          81,986,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,730,760
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 125,386,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,617,239
<BONDS>                                         22,400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        11,814,036
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,420,416
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   125,386,583
<SALES>                                         44,658,302
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,658,302
<CGS>                                           33,154,397
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,154,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,214,268
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 409,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,867,026
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,397,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,470,026
<DISCONTINUED>                                     200,886
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,670,912
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.45
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. WALKER

No. 101 PC.

No. 45 (Spring Term).

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 501.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 24 January 1978.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            DISTINCTIVE DEVICES, INC.

                       CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                          OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                          -----------------------------

     The undersigned, Sanjay Mody, the President, Chief Executive Officer,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Distinctive Devices, Inc. (the
"Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

     1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 19th day of August, 2003.

                                         /s/ SANJAY MODY
                                         ---------------
                                         Sanjay Mody
                                         President,
                                         Chief Executive Officer,
                                         Treasurer and
                                         Chief Financial Officer