alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 2 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 3 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 4 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 5 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 6 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 7 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 8 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 9 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 10 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 11 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 12 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 13 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 14 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 15 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 16 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 17 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 18 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 19 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 20 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 21 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 22 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 23 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 24 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 25 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-4 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 26 of 26
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00229

- CR

M ICHAEL D AVID C ORONADO

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 372nd District

Court

of Tarrant County ( 1672326 )

July 11, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Bassel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial cour t’s j udgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

Justice Dabney Bassel
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC     Document 12      Filed 12/21/2007     Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lancaster Colony Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
John B. Gerlach, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company and John L. Boylan,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial conditions and results of
            operations of the Company.

                                     By: /s/ JOHN B. GERLACH, JR.
                                         -------------------------------
                                             John B. Gerlach, Jr.
                                             Chief Executive Officer

                                     November 9, 2004

                                     By: /s/ JOHN L. BOYLAN
                                         -------------------------------
                                             John L. Boylan
                                             Chief Financial Officer

                                     November 9, 2004
#### STATE v. BAILEY

No. 158 PC

Case below: 49 NC App 377

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 February 1981.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,224,764
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,388
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,304,764
<PP&E>                                         276,880
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,542,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,061,377
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       157,658
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,695,498
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,542,230
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               801,540
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,636,919
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               396,438
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             212,501
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,245,858)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,245,858)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,245,858)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)


</TABLE>
If Mr. Schmitz, as counsel for defendant Becton, wishes to reply to the 

government submission of April 3, 2024, he shall do so no later than May 1, 2024. 

SO ORDERED.

Dated: New York, New York

April 10, 2024

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------x

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 02-cr-451 (PKC)

-against- ORDER

 

CHAROD BECTON,

Defendant(s).

-----------------------------------------------------------x

CASTEL, U.S.D.J.

Case 1:02-cr-00451-PKC Document 291 Filed 04/10/24 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. BURKE

No. 87 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 469.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 April 1976.
#### PARRIS v. DISPOSAL, INC.

No. 122 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 282.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 June 1979. Motion of plaintiff to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 June 1979.
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 4 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

SONERA CORPORATION

May 8, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.


Washington, D.C. 20549




|    |                                                                                
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Re: | Letter of Representation of Arthur Andersen
    Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

Steuerberatungsgesellschaft mbH, Berlin


Sonera Corporation (Sonera) holds a
material non-controlling interest in Group 3G UMTS Holding GmbH,
Munich, Germany (Group 3G). The consolidated
financial statements of Group 3G are included as part of the
Registration Statement on Form F-4 to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission by Telia AB
(Telia) in connection with Telias exchange
offer for all of the outstanding shares and American Depositary
Shares of Sonera Corporation.

Arthur Andersen
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft Steuerberatungsgesellschaft
mbH, Berlin, (Andersen) has audited the consolidated
financial statements of Group 3G and subsidiaries as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2001 according to generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States.

Andersen has represented to Sonera that its audit
was subject to Andersens quality control system for the
U.S. accounting and auditing practice in order to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in
compliance with professional standards and that there was
appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel performing the
audit, as well as the availability of U.S. national office
consultation. The availability of personnel at foreign
affiliates of Andersen was not relevant to the audit of Group 3G.



| |           
| | ----------
| | Sincerely,



| |     |                 
| | --- | ----------------
| | By: | /s/ KIM IGNATIUS

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Chief Financial Officer
| | Sonera Corporation
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 232 (Monday, December 5, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 72371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23633]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2005-21256; Airspace Docket No. 05-AGL-04]


Establishment of Class D Airspace; Eau Claire, WI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which establishes Class D airspace at Eau Claire, WI.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, October 27, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Davis, FAA Terminal Operations, 
Central Service Office, Airspace and Procedures Branch, AGL-530, 
Federal Aviation Administration, 2300 East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, 
Illinois 60018, telephone (847) 294-7131, or David Sapadin (847) 294-
7477.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on September 6, 
2005 (70 FR 52903). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure 
for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be 
no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public 
that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written 
adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an 
adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the 
regulation would become effective on that date.

    Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois, on November 1, 2005.
Nancy B. Kort,
Area Director, Central Terminal Operations.
[FR Doc. 05-23633 Filed 12-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                          1,796,579
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  20,492,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                      494,997
<INVENTORY>                                    12,448,574
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               36,236,401
<PP&E>                                         68,827,063
<DEPRECIATION>                                 32,603,787
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 80,840,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          19,216,848
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                        8,551,476
<OTHER-SE>                                     23,959,612
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   80,840,799
<SALES>                                        35,687,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               35,687,624
<CGS>                                          26,294,114
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  26,294,114
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                5,783,353
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  105,997
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                326,348
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,177,812
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,133,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,044,812
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,044,812
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.48


</TABLE>
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000344

18-AUG-2015

08:43 AM
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 193 (Friday, October 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 57057]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4942]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission; 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 552b of Title 5, 
United States Code, that a meeting of the John H. Chafee Blackstone 
River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission will be held on 
Thursday, November 15, 2007.
    The Commission was established pursuant to Public Law 99-647. The 
purpose of the Commission is to assist federal, state and local 
authorities in the development and implementation of an integrated 
resource management plan for those lands and waters within the 
Corridor.
    The meeting will convene on November 15, 2007 at 9 a.m. at Douglas 
Town Hall, located at 29 Depot Street, Douglas, MA for the following 
reasons:
    1. Approval of Minutes.
    2. Chairman's Report.
    3. Executive Director's Report.
    4. Financial Budget.
    5. Public Input.
    It is anticipated that about twenty-five people will be able to 
attend the session in addition to the Commission members.
    Interested persons may make oral or written presentations to the 
Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be made 
prior to the meeting to: Jan H. Reitsma, Executive Director, John H. 
Chafee, Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission, 
One Depot Square, Woonsocket, RI 02895, Tel.: (401) 762-0250.
    Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from 
Jan H. Reitsma, Executive Director of the Commission at the 
aforementioned address.

Jan H. Reitsma,
Executive Director, BRVNHCC.
[FR Doc. 07-4942 Filed 10-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P
LCS INDUSTRIES, INC.


                           Commission File No. 0-12329



                                     ------


                          Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

                                     for the

                         Nine Months Ended June 30, 1997




                                     EXHIBIT




<PAGE>

                                INDEX TO EXHIBIT


  Exhibit
    No.                             Description
    ---                             -----------

    11                Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings





<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                      LCS INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE AND
                             COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                  For the Three and Nine Months Ended June 30,
                                   (Unaudited)


                                                        Three Months                    Nine Months
                                                   -------------------------     ------------------------- 
                                                      1997           1996           1997           1996
                                                   ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
<S>                                                <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding ..........      4,654,374      4,399,717      4,612,317      4,299,128

Weighted average - dilutive stock options ....        359,968        636,540        372,048        681,877

Shares issuable in connection with the
   acquisition of Catalog Resources, Inc. ....        121,713        160,475        121,713        160,475
                                                   ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
                                                    5,136,055      5,196,732      5,106,078      5,141,480
                                                   ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========

Net income ...................................     $1,190,169     $1,752,695     $5,488,473     $6,035,790

Earnings per share and common equivalent share     $      .23     $      .34     $     1.07     $     1.17
                                                   ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========


</TABLE>
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40606

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

BRADEN THOMAS BARNES,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 688

Filed: October 2, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Timothy L. Hansen, District Judge. 

Order denying Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of 

sentence, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben Patrick McGreevy, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Braden Thomas Barnes pled guilty to robbery, Idaho Code § 18-6501. The district court 

sentenced Barnes to a unified term of fifteen years, with three years determinate.

1

 After Barnes 

completed a period of retained jurisdiction, the district court relinquished jurisdiction and 

executed a reduced sentence of a unified term of fifteen years, with one and one-half years 

 

1 Barnes also pled guilty to misdemeanor driving under the influence, and the district court 

imposed a sentence of sixty days in jail to run concurrently with Barnes’ sentence for robbery. 

Barnes’ conviction and sentence for misdemeanor driving under the influence are not at issue in 

this appeal.
2

determinate. Barnes filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of his sentence, which 

the district court denied. Barnes appeals.

A motion for reduction of sentence under Idaho Criminal Rule 35 is essentially a plea for 

leniency, addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton, 143 Idaho 318, 319, 

144 P.3d 23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee, 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of 

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the 

motion. State v. Huffman, 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the 

record, including the new information submitted with Barnes’ Rule 35 motion, we conclude no 

abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order denying Barnes’ Rule 

35 motion is affirmed.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gerhard Jacobs, Chief Financial Officer of Rockwell Diamonds
Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of
the Company for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009 (the Annual Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

| | By:    | /s/ G
      Jacobs     
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Gerhard Jacobs         
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| | Date:  | August 30, 2010        

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of DigitalFX International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Craig Ellins, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/  Craig Ellins
---------------------------------------------
Craig Ellins
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

March 19, 2007
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. THOMPSON

No. 122.

Case below: 53 N.C. App. 371.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 October 1981. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 6 October 1981.