alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.5**
TERM NOTE
$                              ,       
     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, VERIDIAN CORPORATION, a corporationorganized under the laws of the state of Delaware (the“Borrower”), herebypromises to pay to the order of               ,(the “Lender”), at the place and timesprovided in the Credit Agreement referred to below, the principal sumof               DOLLARS($          ) or, if less, the unpaid principal amount of all Term Loans made tothe Borrower by the Lender pursuant to that certain Credit Agreement, dated asof June 10, 2002 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified, the“Credit Agreement”) by and among the Borrower, the lenders who are or maybecome a party thereto (collectively, the “Lenders”) and Wachovia Bank,National Association, as Administrative Agent. Capitalized terms used hereinand not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the CreditAgreement.
     The unpaid principal amount of this Term Note from time to timeoutstanding is subject to mandatory repayment from time to time as provided inthe Credit Agreement and shall bear interest as provided in Section 5.1 of theCredit Agreement. All payments of principal and interest on this Term Noteshall be payable in lawful currency of the United States of America inimmediately available funds to the account designated in the Credit Agreement.
     This Term Note is entitled to the benefits of, and evidences Obligationsincurred under, the Credit Agreement, to which reference is made for adescription of the security for this Term Note and for a statement of the termsand conditions on which the Borrower is permitted and required to makeprepayments and repayments of principal of the Obligations evidenced by thisTerm Note and on which such Obligations may be declared to be immediately dueand payable.
     THIS TERM NOTE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED AND ENFORCED INACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, WITHOUT REFERENCE TOTHE CONFLICTS OR CHOICE OF LAW PRINCIPLES THEREOF.
     The Debt evidenced by this Term Note is senior in right of payment to allSubordinated Debt referred to in the Credit Agreement.
     The Borrower hereby waives all requirements as to diligence, presentment,demand of payment, protest and (except as required by the Credit Agreement)notice of any kind with respect to this Term Note.

 

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower has caused this Term Note to be executedunder seal by a duly authorized officer as of the day and year first abovewritten.
 VERIDIAN CORPORATION[CORPORATE SEAL]
 By:
#### PAGITT v. PAGITT

No. 117 PC.

Case below: 43 N.C. App. 619.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 January 1980.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ANNA RUILOBA,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00123-CR

Appeal from the

171st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20140D02097)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s sixth motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until December 7, 2018. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Ruben P. Morales, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before December 7, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of November, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1

                           Section 302 Certifications

I, Richard Pierce, certify that:

         1. I have  reviewed  this  annual  report  on  form  10-KSB  of  Laredo
Investment Corp.

         2. Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any
untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary
to make the  statements  made,  in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report.

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

         4.  I  am  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
the registrant and have:

         a) Designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared.

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and  procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the  filing  date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c)  Presented  in this  quarterly  report  our  conclusions  about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. I have  disclosed,  based  on our  most  recent  evaluation,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) All significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls; and

Date: April 13, 2004

By: /s/ Richard Pierce
Richard Pierce, CEO, Director
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1785
ILESANMI ODUNWOLE LAROJA, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A76-588-504) Submitted: June 19, 2003 Decided: July 8, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joshua A. Moses, JOSHUA MOSES & ASSOCIATES, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jane Candaux, Senior Litigation Counsel, Audrey B. Hemesath, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ilesanmi Odunwole Laroja, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming without opinion the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of asylum and withholding of removal. Laroja challenges the IJ’s negative credibility finding, asserting that the IJ misunderstood his testimony, placed too much weight on minor inconsistencies, and that the IJ’s findings were contrary to the evidence in the record. We have thoroughly reviewed the record in light of the IJ’s findings and conclude that Laroja’s assertions are without merit. See8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4) (2000); Rusu v. INS , 296 F.3d 316, 323 (4th Cir. 2002); Matter of S-A- , Int. Dec. 3433 (BIA 2000); Matter of A-S- , 21 I. & N. Dec. 1106 (BIA 1998). Laroja also contends that the Board abused its discretion in affirming the IJ’s findings without opinion and failed to properly evaluate his appeal. As these claims are merely mentioned in Laroja’s brief and are entirely undeveloped, we find that they have been abandoned. Edwards v. City of Goldsboro , 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999). We accordingly deny Laroja’s petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are3 adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### STATE v. CHAMBERS and HICKS and DUNN

No. 230 PC.

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 380.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 30 July 1979. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 30 July 1979.
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 5 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 5 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 2 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 5 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 3 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 5 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 4 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 5 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 5 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 5 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 5 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 5 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 8 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 5 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 9 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 5 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 10 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 5 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 5 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 12 of 12
# C_2011172EN.01001701.xml

| 11.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/17

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 172/07

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Strasbourg–Copenhagen |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | Suspension of the current PSOs until 5 December 2011 inclusive
  Entry into force of the new PSOs on 6 December 2011 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | Decree of 16 May 2011 amending the public service obligations imposed on regular air services between Strasbourg and Copenhagen
  NOR: DEVA1111228A
  http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do
  For further information please contact:





  Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile |
| DTA/SDT/T2 |
| 50 rue Henry Farman |
| 75720 Paris Cedex 15 |
| FRANCE |
| Tel. +33 158094321 |
| E-mail: osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr |

Member State

France

Route concerned

Strasbourg–Copenhagen

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

Suspension of the current PSOs until 5 December 2011 inclusive

Entry into force of the new PSOs on 6 December 2011

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

Decree of 16 May 2011 amending the public service obligations imposed on regular air services between Strasbourg and Copenhagen

NOR: DEVA1111228A

http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do

For further information please contact:

Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile

DTA/SDT/T2

50 rue Henry Farman

75720 Paris Cedex 15

FRANCE

Tel. +33 158094321

E-mail: osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr

---
#### T. N. Beall, administrator, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Edward J. Coats, principal, and W. E. Carswell and John Smith, securities, defendants in error.

An affidavit to open a judgment, upon the sole ground that the defendant is willing to return to the plaintiff *in fi. fa.*the property, the purchase of which created the debt on which the judgment is founded, should have been dismissed and the sheriff ordered to proceed with the sale.

Relief. Tender. Motion to open judgment. Before Judge Robinson. Wilkinson Superior Court. April Term, 1871.

On the 29th day of November, 1869, an execution issued from Wilkinson Superior Court, in favor of plaintiff in error, *513against defendants in error, for the sum of $2471.00, besides interest and costs. This execution was levied upon a certain tract of land, as the property of Edward J. Coats, on February 27th, 1868. On the 11th day of February, 1869, Edward J. Coats made affidavit that “said *fi. fa.*was issued upon a judgment entered upon a contract made prior to June 1st, 1865, and that defendant makes this affidavit in order to obtain the benefits of ‘An Act for the relief of debtors, and to authorize the adjustment of debts upon the principles of equity/” At the April Term, 1869, said defendant in error moved to have said judgment opened, upon three grounds,, the second of which was as follows: “Defendant further states that said contract was a note given for land purchased by defendant from plaintiff; that this defendant still has said land in possession, in his own right, and that he is and has been willing to return the same, with just and reasonable compensation for the use, rents and profits thereof) for the time the same has been in the possession of this defendant.” The Court overruled the first and third grounds and sustained the second, whereupon plaintiff in execution excepted.

J. Rutherford; J. Wingfield; E. Cumming, for plaintiff in error.

J. G. Ockington; F. Chambers, by brief, for defendants.

Montgomery, Judge.

This was an effort made by one of the defendants, (the principal in the debt sued.on,) to avail himself of the provisions of the third section of the Relief Act of 1868. That section does not vary essentially, so far as defendant in this case attempts to avail himself of it, from the proviso to the fifteenth section to the Relief Act of 1870. That has been declared by this Court to be unconstitutional, in Abercrombie *vs.*Baxter, decided October 17th, 1871. The third section of the Relief Act of 1868, so far as applicable to cases like the present, must share the same fate. See, also, 42 Georgia, 61.

*514Our judgment, therefore, is that an affidavit to open a judgment upon the sole ground that the defendant is willing to return to the plaintiff in *fi. fa.*the property, the purchase of which created the debt on which the judgment is founded, should have been dismissed and the sheriff ordered to proceed with the sale.

Judgment reversed.
CERTIFICATION

I, Samir N. Masri, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lincoln International
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


                                           /s/ Samir N. Masri
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Samir N. Masri
                                           Title: Treasurer and Chief Financial
                                                  Officer
                                           Date:  March 9, 2007
#### STATE v. ROBINSON

No. 163 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 502.

Application by defendant for further review denied 12 July 1979.
#### STATE v. MARTIN

No. 224 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 326.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 19 June 1981.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00340-CR

MARCOS ENRIQUE URDANETA,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 371st District 

Court

of Tarrant County (1566970)

October 3, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------



               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of North American Galvanizing &
Coatings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned hereby certifies in his or her capacity as an office of the Company,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to his or her knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and the results of
          operations of the Company.


                   NORTH AMERICAN GALVANIZING & COATINGS, INC.
                                  (Registrant)



                               /s/ Ronald J. Evans
                               -----------------------------
                               President and
                               Chief Executive Officer
                               (Principal Executive Officer)



                               /s/ Beth B. Hood
                               -----------------------------
                               Vice President and
                               Chief Financial Officer
                               (Principal Financial Officer)


Date:   April 27, 2006
|   | Exhibit 32.1 |
|--------|--------------|

| /s/  Steven L. Watson                 |   | /s/  Bobby D. O’Brien              |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Steven L. WatsonPresident and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 6, 2009                                                             |   | Bobby D. O’BrienVice President andChief Financial OfficerAugust 6, 2009                                       |
# C_2011367EN.01000101.xml

| 16.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 9 December 2011

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of De Nederlandsche Bank

(ECB/2011/22)

2011/C 367/01

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of De Nederlandsche Bank’s external auditors will end following the audit for the financial year 2011. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2012. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of De Nederlandsche Bank’s external auditors will end following the audit for the financial year 2011. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2012.

| (3) | De Nederlandsche Bank has selected Deloitte Accountants BV as its external auditors for the financial years 2012 to 2018, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

De Nederlandsche Bank has selected Deloitte Accountants BV as its external auditors for the financial years 2012 to 2018,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Deloitte Accountants BV should be appointed as the external auditors of De Nederlandsche Bank for the financial years 2012 to 2018.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 9 December 2011.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 10-5 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 10-5 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 2 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 10-5 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 3 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 10-5 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 4 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 10-5 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 5 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 10-5 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 10-5 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 10-5 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 8 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 10-5 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 9 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 10-5 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 10 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 10-5 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 10-5 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 12 of 12
Case 1:07-cr-00257-SAS Document 2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 1 of 1