alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 12-23-00298-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

EAST TEXAS RANCH, LP, 

APPELLANT

V.

ARLIS A. JONES,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 173RD 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant, East Texas Ranch, LP, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal in which it states 

that it no longer desires to pursue the appeal. The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is 

dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Costs are taxed against the party incurring same.

Opinion delivered March 28, 2024.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MARCH 28, 2024

NO. 12-23-00298-CV

EAST TEXAS RANCH, LP,

Appellant

V.

ARLIS A. JONES,

Appellee

Appeal from the 173rd District Court

of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CV20-0498-173)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss 

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and 

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and 

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance. Costs are taxed against the party 

incurring same.

By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J
Exhibit
31.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


ABAZIAS,
INC..


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(CHAPTER
98, TITLE 15 U.S.C. SS. 7241)




I, Oscar
Rodriguez, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Abazias, Inc..;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) and we
have:




a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;




c)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




d)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):




a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and




b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.




Date:
      August 4, 2008/s/
      Oscar RodriquezOscar
      Rodriquez Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of GFR Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-KSB
for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc Casavant,  Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



By: /s/ Marc Casavant

Marc Casavant, CFO, Director
(Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: December 28, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying the Company's Form 10-KSB soley
pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section  1350,  chapter 63 of title 18,  United  States  Code) and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1
 GRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 7) PLC
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, and all reports on
Form 6-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Gracechurch Card Funding (No. 7) PLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
reports is included in these reports;4.
    
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and
based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required
under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and5.
    
    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicers compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement.
 Name:    Paul Gerard Turner
Title:      Director
Date:      June 23, 2006
 - 26 -
#### SMITH v. AMERICAN & EFIRD MILLS

No. 191 PC.

Case below: 51 N.C. App. 480.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 October 1981. Motion of plaintiff to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 6 October 1981.
Case 1:07-cv-03480-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-03480-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-03480-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-03480-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-03480-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-03480-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-03480-AKH Document 9 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 7 of 7
#### STRICKLAND v. KING and SELLERS v. KING

No. 62 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 222..

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 5 April 1977.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of IVAX Diagnostics, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Giorgio DUrso, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 25, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Giorgio DUrso     
|Giorgio DUrso,        
|Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certificate is provided
solely for the purpose of complying with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and for no other purpose whatsoever. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein or in any of the Companys previous filings under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate the Companys future filings, including this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in whole or in part, this certificate shall not be
incorporated by reference into any such filings. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

QUICK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and

SAGE SOFTWARE, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

V.

SAGE BUSINESS PRODUCTS, LLC,

Defendant.

RULE 7. 1 DISCLOSURE

STATEMENT

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and to enable District

Judges and Magistrate Judges of the Court to evaluate possible disqualification or recusal, the

undersigned, counsel of record for Plaintiffs Quick Technologies, Inc. and Sage Software, Inc.

(private non-governmental parties), certifies that the following are corporate parents, subsidiaries

and/or affiliates of said party, which are publicly held:

Sage Group PLC

Dated: New York, New York

April 30, 2007

Respectfully submitted,

COZEN O'CONNOR, a Professional Corporation

By:

Brian A. Bloom (BB 5722)

Scott M. Kessler (SK 5510)

909 Third Avenue, 17th Floor

New York, New York 10022

(212) 509-9400

Attorneysfor Plaintiffs

Quick Technologies, Inc. and Sage Software, Inc.

NE W YORK_MIDTO W N\617656\ 1 203301.000

Case 1:07-cv-03425-RLE Document 2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000057055
<NAME>                        gk@w2brr
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         2,376,649
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,509,115
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    10,141,961
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               20,275,932
<PP&E>                                         7,508,259
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 30,577,822
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,702,213
<BONDS>                                        2,496,563
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,410
<COMMON>                                       118,758
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   30,577,822
<SALES>                                        26,162,265
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  13,779,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               9,288,172
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             151,285
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,943,246
<INCOME-TAX>                                   60,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,883,246
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,883,246
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .23
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. WOLFE

No. 16 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 464.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 25 August 1975.
#### MAX MICHAEL RICHARDSON, by Next Friend, MAX B. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff v. ROCKINGHAM RAILROAD COMPANY and JOHN ARTHUR McKENZIE, Defendants.

(Filed 28 April, 1965.)

Appeal by defendant, John Arthur McKenzie, from *Brock, S.J.,*November 1964 “A” Civil Session of RICHMOND.

Action for damages for personal injuries.

On 6 October 1961 plaintiff, a minor 8 years of age, was riding as a guest passenger in an automobile owned and operated by defendant McKenzie. The automobile was proceeding northwardly on North Lee Street in the town of Rockingham at the intersection of said street with the tracks of Rockingham Railroad Company. The automobile collided with a train engine which was proceeding eastwardly. Plaintiff was injured; he instituted this action against McKenzie and the Railroad Company, alleging that their concurrent negligence caused his injury.

At the close of the evidence the motion of the Railroad Company for nonsuit was allowed. The trial proceeded against defendant McKenzie and resulted in a verdict of $10,000 for plaintiff. From judgment entered on the verdict, defendant McKenzie appeals.

*368
      *Webb, Lee and Davis for plaintiff.*

*Henry & Henry for defendant McKenzie.*

Pee Cukiam.

Appellant complains of the admission, over his objection, of evidence of medical expenses incurred on account of plaintiff’s injuries, and of the judge’s charge permitting recovery of such expenses by infant plaintiff. Plaintiff’s father had a separate cause of action for such expenses. *Ellington v. Bradford,*242 N.C. 159, 86 S.E. 2d 925. His father served as Next Friend in the prosecution of this action. The allegations of the complaint respecting medical expenses are in general terms, but are sufficient to support a recovery for such expenses. *Kizer v. Bowman,*256 N.C. 565, 124 S.E. 2d 543. Where the father, in whom the cause of action for medical expenses exists, is Next Friend and participates in the trial in which an award is made to the infant for medical expenses, the participation is a waiver of the father’s right to recover such expense's. *Doss v. Sewell,*257 N.C. 404, 125 S.E. 2d 899. According to the decided cases it is error under certain circumstances for the court to permit recovery of medical expenses by an un-emancipated infant, over the objection of defendant made in apt time and form. Upon consideration of the entire record, we are of the opinion that if it was error in the instant case, the error was not sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial.

Appellant assigns as error the charge of the court that the jury might award damages for future or permanent injury. He contends that there is no evidence to support such instruction. The assignment is overruled. The record contains some evidence of permanent injury.

No error.
#### DELLINGER v. BELK

No. 104 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 488.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 24 January 1978.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

July Term 2014

JOAN HERRING,

Appellant,

v.

CHRISTOPHER RINALDI, RALPH RINALDI and

MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA,

Appellees.

No. 4D12-3358

[July 9, 2014]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; David E. French, Judge; L.T. Case No.

502010CA019977XXXMB.

Edmund Gonzalez of Gonzalez & Henley P.L., West Palm Beach, for 

appellant. 

Neal Rose of Bernstein, Chackman, Liss and Rose, Hollywood, for 

appellee, Ralph Rinaldi.

On Confession of Error

PER CURIAM.

The appellee concedes that this case should be reversed and remanded 

based on the Florida Supreme Court’s opinion in Christensen v. Bowen, 

39 Fla. L. Weekly S214 (Fla. Apr. 10, 2014).

Reversed and remanded.

GERBER, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
STAND 

TOGETHER

Join the 

National Firefighter 

Registry (NFR)

for Cancer

A new effort to understand 

and reduce cancer 

JOIN AT 

NFR.CDC.GOV
The more firefighters 

that join the NFR, the 

more questions we 

can answer about 

firefighting and cancer.

All firefighters can join – paid or 

volunteer, active or retired, with or 

without cancer.

By joining the NFR, you can:

 Help protect your brothers 

and sisters in the fire service 

from developing cancer

 Help lessen the impact of cancer 

on firefighters’ families and friends 

 Pave the way for new health and 

safety measures to keep the next 

generation of firefighters safe

 Improve understanding of cancer 

risk among minority, female, and 

volunteer firefighters, as well as 

groups like wildland firefighters

LEARN MORE AT CDC.GOV/NFR
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 196 (Thursday, October 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57940-57941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5054]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, October 11, 2007, at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

THE FOLLOWING ITEM HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE AGENDA: Draft Advisory Opinion 
2007-21: U.S. Representative Rush Holt, by counsel, Caroline P. 
Goodson.

THE FOLLOWING ITEM HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN FROM THE AGENDA: Report of the 
Audit Division on Edwards for President.

[[Page 57941]]


PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-5054 Filed 10-9-07; 2:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
#### STATE v. HUNTER and GRAY

No. 69 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 534.

Petition by defendant Gray for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 2 March 1976.
Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 18 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 18 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Global Entertainment Holdings/Equities
Inc., (the "Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jacob Dadon, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the
Registrant, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss..1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss..906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Registrant.

Date: May 17, 2007

By: /s/ Jacob Dadon
    -------------------------------------
    Jacob Dadon
    Chief Executive and Financial Officer
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 13 Filed 09/18/2007 Page 1 of 1
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2035 

AN ACT 

To require the Transportation Security Administration to 

develop a strategic plan to expand eligibility for the 

PreCheck Program to individuals with Transportation 

Worker Identification Credentials or Hazardous Materials Endorsements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2035 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TSA Credential and 

3 Endorsement Harmonization Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. STRATEGIC PLAN TO EXPAND PRECHECK PRO5 GRAM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

7 date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of 

8 the Transportation Security Administration shall develop 

9 a strategic plan to expand eligibility for the PreCheck Pro10 gram under section 44919 of title 49, United States Code, 

11 to individuals who have— 

12 (1) a Transportation Worker Identification Cre13 dential issued under section 70105 of title 46, 

14 United States Code; or 

15 (2) a Hazardous Materials Endorsement under 

16 the Hazardous Materials Endorsement Threat As17 sessment Program on the State-issued commercial 

18 driver’s license of the individual. 

19 (b) ELEMENTS.—In developing the strategic plan re20 quired by subsection (a), the Administrator shall ensure 

21 that the plan— 

22 (1) allows individuals described in subsection 

23 (a) to opt in to the PreCheck Program; and 

24 (2) provides the Transportation Security Ad25 ministration with the discretion— 
3 

†S 2035 ES

1 (A) to determine whether an individual de2 scribed in subsection (a) meets the eligibility re3 quirements for the Program; and 

4 (B) to establish alternative fee structures 

5 for the Program. 

6 (c) BRIEFING TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 30 

7 days after developing the strategic plan required by sub8 section (a), the Administrator shall brief the Committee 

9 on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate 

10 and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House 

11 of Representatives on the strategic plan. 

Passed the Senate September 10, 2019. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2035 

AN ACT 

To require the Transportation Security Administradentials or Hazardous Materials Endorsements. with Transportation Worker Identification Cre- bility for the PreCheck Program to individuals tion to develop a strategic plan to expand eligi-