alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       UT
<CIK> 0000861388
<NAME> LG&E ENERGY CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                    PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                         3,177,897
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         469,464
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                              733,896
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                            145,531
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4,526,788
<COMMON>                                            776,010 <F1>
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                               277 <F2>
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                 728,942
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                    1,505,229
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                         138,353
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                              1,360,701
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  205,515
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                            0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        20,021
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                 0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                               0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                          0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                    1,296,969
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                     4,526,788
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                           450,724
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                 23,479
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                          357,217 <F3>
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                          380,696
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                              70,028
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                     (803)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                       69,225
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             24,370
<NET-INCOME>                                         44,855
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           1,687
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                        43,168
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             36,810
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            18,108
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                              142,355
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.33
<FN>
<F1>Includes common stock expense of $2,263.
<F2>Represents unrealized loss on marketable securities,
    net of taxes.
<F3>Includes equity in earnings of affiliates of
    $5,981.
<F4>The Company restated this schedule to reflect
    its merger with KU Energy Corporation and to
    reclassify discontinued operations.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (the Company) for the period ending October 31, 2003, I, William A. Shumaker, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended October 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended October 31, 2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: December 15, 2003



/s/    WILLIAM A. SHUMAKERWilliam A. Shumaker President and Chief Executive Officer
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 1 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 2 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 3 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 4 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 5 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 6 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 7 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 8 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 9 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 10 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 11 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 12 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 13 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 14 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 15 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 16 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 17 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 18 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 19 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 20 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 21 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 22 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 23 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 24 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 25 of 25
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1





Gordon A. Ulsh


President and


Chief Executive Officer




Exide Technologies


Corporate Headquarters


13000 Deerfield Parkway, Bldg. 200


Milton, GA 30004


678-556-9000 tel


678-566-9171 fax


www.exide.com



August 27, 2009



To the Board of Directors of Exide Technologies


13000 Deerfield Parkway


Building 200


Milton, Georgia 30004



Gentlemen:



As you know, under the terms of my Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (“Employment
Agreement”), dated January 31, 2008, and as amended by letter agreement dated January 29, 2009
(“First Amendment”), Section 5(a) provides a base salary of $950,000 effective April 1, 2009. Given
the current economic environment, I believe it is appropriate to voluntarily assume a temporary ten
percent (10%) reduction in base salary for the period September 1, 2009 through February 28, 2010.
Any Bonus or Equity Award, as such terms are defined in my Employment Agreement, would be
unaffected by this temporary reduction in base salary.



Defined terms are used as defined in the Employment Agreement unless otherwise defined in this
letter. If this amendment to the Employment Agreement is acceptable to the Board of Directors,
please sign and date below.



EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES



By:       /s/ John P. Reilly—


NAME: JOHN P. REILLY


TITLE: CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD



GORDON A. ULSH



By:       /s/ Gordon A. Ulsh—


EXECUTIVE
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 November 29, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

Honorable Gregory A. Presnell, United States District Judge for the Middle District of *

Florida, sitting by designation.

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-16293

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-03056-CV-BBM-1

EDUARDO DIAZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DR. MARCUS MOSELEY, M.D., 

JOHN DOE #1,

JOHN DOE #2,

Defendants-Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(November 29, 2006)

Before BIRCH and BLACK, Circuit Judges, and PRESNELL, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM:
This Court is aware that on October 30, 2006, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in

1

the cases of Jones v. Bock, No. 03-2576, 2005 WL 1400205 (6th Cir. Jun. 15, 2005), cert.

granted 126 S. Ct. 1462 (2006), argued Oct. 30, 2006, and Williams v. Overton, No. 03-2507

2005 WL 1513102, (6th Cir. Jun. 22, 2005), cert. granted 126 S. Ct. 1463 (2006), argued Oct.

30, 2006.

For example, we are not able to determine the factual basis for the exhaustion issues 2

from the current record on appeal.

2

Eduardo Diaz, proceeding pro se, filed this § 1983 suit alleging civil rights

violations by Defendant, Dr. Moseley, and other unidentified Defendants. He

appeals the district court’s (1) grant of summary judgment for Dr. Moseley,

(2) dismissal of the claim for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies,

(3) denial of his motion for appointment of counsel, and (4) denial of his motion to

compel discovery.1

After hearing oral argument and reviewing the record developed by

Appellant proceeding pro se before the district court, we have determined the

record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to review the issues in this case.2

Where appellate review is “hampered because the record is ambiguous due to
The Court appreciates the fine representation of appellate appointed counsel and hopes

3

he would consider accepting appointment to continue to represent Appellant in subsequent

proceedings.

3

inadequate development of the critical facts,” we have held it proper to remand to

the district court. United States v. Robinson, 625 F.2d 1211, 1217 n.7 (11th Cir.

1980) (citations omitted).3

VACATED AND REMANDED.
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-13 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-13 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-13 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 3 of 3
#### STATE v. JONES

No. 26 PC.

Now No. 3 PA 82.

Case below: 53 N.C. App. 466.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 12 January 1982
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7744

RICKY WAYNE BOBLETT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RON ANGELONE; LISA EDWARDS; MAJOR PEROTELLI;

EDWARD C. MORRIS; MR. CARR,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

LARRY D. HUFFMAN; DAN T. MAHON; GENE JOHNSON,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CA-95-1009)

Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 5, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky Wayne Boblett, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Boblett v. Angelone, No. CA-95-1009 (W.D. Va. Oct. 16, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

PHILLIP NELSON BURNS, MIRJANA 

PAVKOVICH, Administrator of the Estate of

Rade Pavkovich, Deceased, and Warren 

Elmer Halpap, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 -againstGRUPO MÉXICO, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican 

Corporation, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 1:07-CV-3496(WHP) 

DECLARATION OF ALBERTO DE LA 

PARRA ZAVALA IN SUPPORT OF GRUPO 

MÉXICO, S.A. DE C.V.'S MOTION TO 

REMAND OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO 

DISMISS THE COMPLAINT FOR IMPROPER 

SERVICE AND LACK OF PERSONAL 

JURISDICTION

I, Alberto de la Parra Zavala, declare as follows: 

1. I am the General Counsel of Grupo México S.A. B. de C.V. (“Grupo 

México”), a named defendant in Burns v. Grupo México S.A. de C.V., Index No.:04114728 filed 

in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (the “Action”). ASARCO 

LLC recently attempted to remove the Action to the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of New York and captioned 1:07-CV-3496. 

2. As General Counsel, I am responsible for knowing the contents of Grupo 

México’s business records pertaining to the items described herein. 

3. Based on my employment as General Counsel for Grupo México, I have 

personal knowledge and information regarding the matters contained herein. 

4. Grupo México is a corporation organized under the laws of Mexico, and 

its principal place of business is Mexico City, Mexico. 

5. Grupo México, being a Mexican corporation, conducts its business in 

Spanish, the language of Mexico. 

Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 19-3 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 1 of 3
 

-2-

6. Grupo México is not a resident of New York or Texas, is not registered to 

conduct business in New York or Texas, and does not conduct business operations in New York 

or Texas. 

7. Grupo México does not maintain a registered agent for service of process 

in New York or Texas. 

8. Grupo México does not maintain an office or warehouse, or any other 

facilities in New York or Texas, nor does it have a mailing address or any telephone numbers in 

New York or Texas. 

9. Grupo México owns no real estate in New York or Texas, and is not 

required to pay any real estate taxes, personal property taxes, or other taxes in New York or 

Texas. 

10. Grupo México has no agents, sales representatives, or any employees 

whatsoever in New York or Texas. 

11. Grupo México does no direct advertising in New York or Texas with any 

New York or Texas media. 

12. Grupo México has never purchased, sold, provided, or received any goods 

at any time or in any place in New York or Texas. 

13. Grupo México acquired ASARCO in 1999 under an Agreement and Plan 

of Merger dated October 25, 1999, whereby Grupo México acquired all of ASARCO’s common 

stock. 

 The foregoing is affirmed under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of 

America pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746. 

Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 19-3 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 19-3 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation

# AGENCY:

 Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY: 

Notice is hereby given of the appointments of members to a performance review board for the Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Michael J. McAlister, Deputy Director, Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation, 201 E. Birch Ave., Room 11, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, Telephone (928) 779-2721.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 Section 4314(c) of Title 5, U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations, one or more Senior Executive Service (SES) performance review boards. The function of the boards is to review and evaluate the initial appraisal of senior executives' performance and make recommendations to the appointing authority relative to the performance of these executives. Because of its small size, the Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation has appointed SES appointees from other Federal agencies to serve on its performance review board. The members of the performance review board for the Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation are:
      ( print page 55834)    
Ronald Linz, Deputy Director, International Broadcasting Bureau.

John Farrell, Executive Director, U.S. Arctic Research Commission.

Ernest Garcia, Deputy Director, Selective Service System.

Dated: September 24, 2007.

Michael J. McAlister,

Deputy Director, Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation.

[FR Doc. 07-4802 Filed 9-28-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7560-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-6 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-6 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 2 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-6 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 3 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-6 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 4 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-6 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 5 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-6 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 6 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-6 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 7 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-6 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 8 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-6 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 9 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-6 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 10 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-6 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 11 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-6 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 12 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-6 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 13 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-6 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 14 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-6 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 15 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-6 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 16 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-6 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 17 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-6 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 18 of 18
#### PEELE v. SMITH

No. 108 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 274.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 December 1975.
#### STATE v. BUTNER

No. 203P82.

Case below: 56 N.C. App. 642.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 May 1982.
#### PIERCE v. BLOCK CORP.

No. 114 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 276.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 December 1975.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ISSUER'S INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED MARCH 31, 1998, SET FORTH IN THE
ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                              87
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,017
<ALLOWANCES>                                       284
<INVENTORY>                                      4,175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,766
<PP&E>                                          33,084
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,393
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,492
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,149
<BONDS>                                          8,876
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           819
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,467
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,492
<SALES>                                         12,164
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,164
<CGS>                                            9,355
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,701
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    596
<INCOME-TAX>                                       256
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                340
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       340
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, D. Michael Parker, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 15, 2007 

 
/s/ D. Michael ParkerD. Michael Parker
Senior Vice President, Finance and

Chief FinancialOfficer
#### LOWE’S v. HUNT

No. 236 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 84.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 September 1976.