alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE  SHEET OF MENTOR ON CALL,  INC. AS OF DECEMBER  31, 1999 AND THE RELATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)



</TABLE>
#### IN RE SIMMONS

No. 97 PC.

Case below: 43 N.C. App. 123.

Petition by caveators for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 January 1980.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1998
<CASH>                                             684
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,747
<ALLOWANCES>                                       313
<INVENTORY>                                     10,194
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,172
<PP&E>                                          22,533
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,531
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,688
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,733
<BONDS>                                          4,767
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,805
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,688
<SALES>                                          5,645
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,645
<CGS>                                            5,967
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,215
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    30
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  87
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,431)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (720)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,711)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,711)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.42)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.2

                    MODIFICATION OF SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE


WHEREAS this agreement is in reference to a loan which is evidenced by an
instrument entitled Secured Promissory Note, (NOTE), dated October 29, 1999
executed by LEE PHARMACEUTICALS for the original principal sum of Four
Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($400,000.00) and payable to the order
of FINOVA CAPITAL CORPORATION.

Principal balance outstanding on this Note as of this date is THREE HUNDRED
NINETY NINE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED SEVENTY EIGHT AND 00/100 DOLLARS
($399,778.00).

NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed by the undersigned parties that the Note shall be
amended in the following respect:


Maturity date of the Note shall be extended to May 21, 2002.


Except as noted above, all the terms, conditions and provisions of said Note
shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

Date:   May 19, 2000                     Loan Number: LEE08
     ----------------                                -------

FINOVA CAPITAL CORPORATION               LEE PHARMACEUTICALS
a Delaware corporation                   a California corporation
--------------------------               ------------------------


BY:      FARHAD MOTIA                    BY:    RONALD G. LEE
    ----------------------------             ------------------------
    Farhad Motia, Vice President             Ronald G. Lee, President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CALVIN BROWN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 518 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of March, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Case 3:10-cr-00030-MCR-EMT Document 330 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 11Case 3:10-cr-00030-MCR-EMT Document 330 Filed 10/28/11 Page 2 of 11Case 3:10-cr-00030-MCR-EMT Document 330 Filed 10/28/11 Page 3 of 11Case 3:10-cr-00030-MCR-EMT Document 330 Filed 10/28/11 Page 4 of 11Case 3:10-cr-00030-MCR-EMT Document 330 Filed 10/28/11 Page 5 of 11Case 3:10-cr-00030-MCR-EMT Document 330 Filed 10/28/11 Page 6 of 11Case 3:10-cr-00030-MCR-EMT Document 330 Filed 10/28/11 Page 7 of 11Case 3:10-cr-00030-MCR-EMT Document 330 Filed 10/28/11 Page 8 of 11Case 3:10-cr-00030-MCR-EMT Document 330 Filed 10/28/11 Page 9 of 11Case 3:10-cr-00030-MCR-EMT Document 330 Filed 10/28/11 Page 10 of 11Case 3:10-cr-00030-MCR-EMT Document 330 Filed 10/28/11 Page 11 of 11
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

BILLY ROGERS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00010-MP-AK

BELL, et al,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court upon the filing of a Response by Plaintiff to the Court’s

previous order directing him to file an amended complaint on the proper forms and provide

inmate account information. (See Docs.3, 7 and 8). In his response to the latest Court order,

Plaintiff seeks assistance from this Court to appoint counsel and to direct persons to assist him at

the correctional institution where he resides in Lucasville, Ohio. It has become obvious as the

result of this most recent filing that Plaintiff is seeking to bring claims against persons at the

institution where he is presently incarcerated and there is no connection either with the claims or

the parties with the Northern District of Florida.

A federal district court has the authority under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) to transfer a case to

another district or division "in which it could have been brought." A court may raise the issue of

defective venue sua sponte, but should not dismiss an improperly filed case for lack of venue

without giving the parties an opportunity to respond. Lipofsky v. New York State Workers

Comp. Bd., 861 F.2d 1257, 1259 (11th Cir. 1988). The Lipofsky court did not place the same

limitations on the court's ability to transfer a case to the appropriate forum pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:10-cv-00010-MP-AK

§ 1404(a). See Lipofsky, 861 F.2d at 1259, n. 2. Thus, it is recommended that the case be

transferred rather than dismissed. There is no need for a hearing on this transfer. Cf. Costlow v.

Weeks, 790 F.2d 1486, 1488 (9th Cir. 1986) with Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 934 (D.C.

Cir. 1974). 

Because Lucasville is in Scioto County Ohio, which is in the Western Division of the

Southern District of Ohio, this matter should be transferred to that court for all further

proceedings.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

That the Clerk of Court shall transfer this matter to the Western Division of the Southern 

District of Ohio.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of April, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-27 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-27 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 2 of 2
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: AMENDMENT OF § 81.505 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA INTEREST ON LA WYERS TRUST ACCOUNT REGULATIONS : : : : : : : NO. 134 DISCIPLINARY RULES DOCKET

**ORDER**
**PER CURIA M**  **AN D**  **NOW**, this 28th day of May, 201 5 , **IT IS**  **ORDERED** pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that Section 81.505 of the Pennsylvania Interest on Lawyers Trust Account Regulations is hereby amended as attached hereto. The Form for Pro Hac Vice Admission shall be modified to reflect the increase in the admission fee. To the extent that notice of the proposed amendment would be required by Pa.R.J.A. No. 103 or otherwise, the immediate amendment of Section 81.505 is required in the interest of justice and efficient administration. This **ORDER** shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall be effective on June 12, 2015

.
Additions are shown in bold and are underlined. Deletions are shown in bold and brackets.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             49,219
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                       193,414
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   54,758
<PP&E>                                          9,536,147
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3,075,304
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  6,813,280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           8,373,010
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                       10,927,063
<OTHER-SE>                                      8,693,415
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    6,813,280
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    3,768
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  392,089
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                605,867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (994,188)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (994,188)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (994,188)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.09)




</TABLE>
#### STATE v. WRIGHT

No. 241 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 166.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 July 1981.
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1

GRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 2) PLC
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002

I, Richard Francis Sommers, certify that:



|1. |  | I have reviewed this annual report on
Form 20-F, and all reports on Form 6-K
containing distribution or servicing
reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this
annual report, of Gracechurch Card
Funding (No. 2) PLC;                                                                                                                                               
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | Based on my knowledge, the information
in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading as
of the last day of the period covered
by this annual report;                                  
|  
|3. |  | Based on my knowledge, the distribution
or servicing information required to be
provided to the trustee by the servicer
under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in
these reports is included in these
reports;                                                                                                                                                     
|  
|4. |  | I am responsible for reviewing the
activities performed by the servicer
under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement and based upon my
knowledge and the annual compliance
review required under that agreement,
and except as disclosed in the reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under that agreement; and                                                          
|  
|5. |  | The reports disclose all significant
deficiencies relating to the servicers
compliance with the minimum servicing
standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public
accountant, after conducting a review
in compliance with the Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers or similar procedure, as set
forth in the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement.

By: /s/ Richard Francis SommersName: Richard Francis SommersTitle: DirectorDate: June 21, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS CONTAINED IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         261,235
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  291,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               558,521
<PP&E>                                         390,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                  71,502
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 973,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          361,305
<BONDS>                                        986,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,438
<OTHER-SE>                                   (466,952)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   973,776
<SALES>                                      3,543,516
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,543,516
<CGS>                                        3,237,548
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,820,833
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,546
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,285,776)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,285,776)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 15 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 15 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 15 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                                                                 EXHIBIT 12

                                                        KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY
                                           Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                                   (in thousands except ratio data)
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                    Twelve
                                                                                                    Months
                                                              Year Ended December 31,               Ended
                                                -------------------------------------------------
                                                  1996       1997       1998      1999      2000   6/30/01
                                                  ----       ----       ----      ----      ----   -------
<S>                                             <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>      <C>
Fixed Charges:
  Interest on First Mortgage Bonds . . . . . .  $14,914    $14,867    $13,936   $12,712   $ 9,503  $ 8,854
  Interest on Other Long-term Debt . . . . . .    6,446      8,597     12,188    13,525    16,367   16,306
  Interest on Short-term Debt. . . . . . . . .    2,849      3,034      2,455     2,552     3,295    2,682
  Miscellaneous Interest Charges . . . . . . .      555        559        634       869     2,523    2,529
  Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals.      800      1,700      1,500     1,200     1,700    1,700
                                                -------    -------    -------   -------   -------  -------
       Total Fixed Charges . . . . . . . . . .  $25,564    $28,757    $30,713   $30,858   $33,388  $32,071
                                                =======    =======    =======   =======   =======  =======

Earnings:
  Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  $16,973    $20,746    $21,676   $25,430   $20,763  $20,079
  Plus Federal Income Taxes. . . . . . . . . .    5,119      9,415      9,785    12,993    17,884   17,424
  Plus State Income Taxes. . . . . . . . . . .      598      2,190      2,096     2,784     2,457    3,514
  Plus Fixed Charges (as above). . . . . . . .   25,564     28,757     30,713    30,858    33,388   32,071
                                                -------    -------    -------   -------   -------  -------
       Total Earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . .  $48,254    $61,108    $64,270   $72,065   $74,492  $73,088
                                                =======    =======    =======   =======   =======  =======

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges . . . . . .     1.88       2.12       2.09      2.33      2.23     2.27
                                                   ====       ====       ====      ====      ====     ====
</TABLE>
#### STATE v. PERRY WHALEY.

(Filed 3 March, 1965.)

Criminal Law § 131; Constitutional Law § 36—

Sentence within the statutory maximum cannot be considered cruel or unusual in the constitutional sense.

Appeal by defendant from *Campbell, J.,*November, 1964 Session, ClevelaND Superior Court.

This appeal challenges the resentences imposed on the defendant pursuant to the order of this Court entered on a former appeal reported in 262 N.C. 536, 138 S.E. 2d 138. Judge Campbell imposed these prison sentences: In No. 5632A, Count 1, ten years; and on Count 2, five years, to run concurrently. In No. 5632B, Count 1, ten years, to begin at the expiration of the ten years sentence imposed in 5632A; and on Count 2, five years, to run concurrently.

At the conclusion of the trial the court permitted defendant’s counsel to resign; thereupon appointed his present attorney of record to prosecute this appeal.

*T. W. Bmton, Attorney General, Harry W. McGalliard, Deputy Attorney General for the State.*

*Joseph M. Wright for defendant appellant.*

Pee Curiam.

The record discloses the following as the defendant’s sole assignment of error:

> “1. The Court’s action in pronouncing judgment against the defendant in #5632A (Count One) and #5632B (Count One) for the reason that said sentences are cruel and unusual, excessive, harsh, and unreasonable punishment and in violation of defendant’s rights under the law of North Carolina.”

The sentence of five years imposed by Judge Campbell on the second count in each bill runs concurrently with the sentence on the first count. Hence the total term of imprisonment is -20 years. The statute permits a maximum of ten years on each of the four counts. The Court had discretionary power to make the sentences run concurrently or consecutively. The punishment imposed is within the limits authorized by statute. When punishment does not exceed the limits fixed by the statute, it cannot be considered cruel or unusual in a constitutional sense. *State v. Welch,*232 N.C. 77, 59 S.E. 2d 199; *State v. Stansbury,*230 N.C. 589, 55 S.E. 2d 185.

Affirmed.