alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
O R D E R

After the Attorney Grievance Commission filed its petition for disciplinary or 

remedial action and request for temporary suspension, the Court issued an order 

requiring respondent to show cause why he should not be temporarily suspended 

pursuant to Rule 19-737(c). Respondent did not file a response.

Upon consideration of the petition for disciplinary or remedial action and 

request for temporary suspension, it is this 27th day of August 2024, by the Supreme 

Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 19-737(d), the Respondent, Brian David 

O’Neill, is temporarily suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland; 

and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Brian David 

O’Neill from the register of attorneys in this Court and shall send notice of this Order to 

the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all 

judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.

 /s/ Matthew J. Fader 

Chief Justice

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE 

COMMISSION

v.

BRIAN DAVID O’NEILL

*

*

*

*

*

*

 IN THE

 SUPREME COURT

 OF MARYLAND

 AG No. 5

 September Term, 2024
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-17 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-17 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-17 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2196 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2196

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 11158 Highway 146 North in Hardin, Texas, as the ``Lucas Lowe 
                        Memorial Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 22, 2019

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself and Mr. Cruz) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 11158 Highway 146 North in Hardin, Texas, as the ``Lucas Lowe 
                        Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LUCAS LOWE MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 11158 Highway 146 North in Hardin, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Lucas Lowe Memorial Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lucas Lowe 
Memorial Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.2
 BARCLAYCARD FUNDING PLCS OFFICERS CERTIFICATE
 GRACECHURCH RECEIVABLES TRUSTEE LIMITED
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
  1.
    
    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Director of the MTN Issuer;2.
    
    I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate on behalf of the MTN Issuer; and3.
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the MTN Issuer has complied with all conditions and covenants under the
Relevant Documents for the issue of the Investor Certificate for the period between January 1, 2005
and December 31, 2005.
   By:
    
    /s/ Paul Gerard TurnerName:   Paul Gerard TurnerTitle:     Director
 - 30 -
# EUR-Lex - 52011SC1372 - EN

*|*

# 52011SC1372

**COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER [...] /* SEC/2011/1372 final */**

			*

			*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ISSUER'S
INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, SET FORTH IN THE
ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U. S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                             132
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,382
<ALLOWANCES>                                       339
<INVENTORY>                                      4,686
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,076
<PP&E>                                          36,264
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,764
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,254
<BONDS>                                          9,948
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           819
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,726
<SALES>                                         34,542
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,542
<CGS>                                           25,399
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 522
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,542
<INCOME-TAX>                                       662
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                880
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       880
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. GREGORY

No. 128 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 762.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 June 1977.
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 90 Filed 10/23/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 90 Filed 10/23/2007 Page 2 of 2
# C_2011057EN.01002901.xml

| 23.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/29

---

Corrigendum to information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 37 of 5 February 2011
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 37 of 5 February 2011

2011/C 57/07

On page 16, first column, second case:

for:

‘Aid No: XA 210/10’,

read:

‘Aid No: XA 201/10’.

---
FALL PROTECTION: As Easy as 1-2-3

1. SELECT AND INSPECT

Select a stable anchorage and anchorage connector with the

required strength, a full body harness that fits your body, and a

lanyard type and length based on the work application and fall

distance. Inspect your harness and lanyard for cuts, tears, dirt,

grease, or burn marks. Remove all damaged items from service.

2. PUT ON

Put on your full body harness 

and make the necessary

adjustments for a correct fit.

A proper fit of the straps 

around the thighs, pelvis, waist, 

and shoulders is critical to the 

performance of the system.

3. TIE OFF

Attach the lanyard to the full body harness D-ring first and 

then connect the snap-hook of the lanyard to the anchorage 

connector or life line. 

! Ensure that the anchorage point is rated for 5,000 pounds for each person attached and that all necessary safety fall

prevention training is up to date.

On average annually, MSHA issued 111 fall-related imminent danger

orders for using the personal fall arrest system incorrectly or not at all.*

* Reported data based on an analysis of 1,057 imminent danger orders issued by MSHA between 

 2010 and 2017. Recommendations are based on OSHA 29 CFR 1910.140, Personal fall protection systems.

To learn more, visit cdc.gov/niosh/mining Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health

Disclaimer: Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. April 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,350
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       15,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (12,515)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,635
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,635)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,635)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,635)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,635)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)


</TABLE>
#### ALLTOP v. PENNEY CO.

No. 54 PC.

Case below: 10 N.C. App. 692.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 30 July 1971.
#### ANDERSON v. GOODING

No. 123 PC.

Case below: 43 N.C. App. 611.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 dismissed 18 December 1979 without prejudice to plaintiff to present any question which he properly presented for review to the Court of Appeals pursuant to Rule 16(a).
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 20 of 20
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6334
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM C. GAMBLE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (6:01-cr-00820-HMH-AL) Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 30, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William C. Gamble, Appellant Pro Se. Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: William C. Gamble appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gamble , No. 6:01-cr-00828-HMH-AL (D.S.C. Feb. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John G. Scanlon, Chief Financial Officer
of Intersections Inc. (the Company), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify as follows:



| | 1. | The amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in such amendment to the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification this 18th day of November 2011.



By:

/s/    John G. ScanlonName:

John G. ScanlonTitle:

Principal Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Intersections Inc.
and will be retained by Intersections Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 188 (Friday, September 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55183-55187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4782]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Revised Non-Foreign Overseas Per Diem Rates

AGENCY: DoD, Per Diem Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee.

ACTION: Notice of Revised Non-Foreign Overseas Per Diem Rates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Per Diem Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee is 
publishing Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 255. This 
bulletin lists revisions in the per diem rates prescribed for U.S. 
Government employees for official travel in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto 
Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands and Possessions of the United 
States. AEA changes announced in Bulletin Number 194 remain in effect. 
Bulletin Number 255 is being published in the Federal Register to 
assure that travelers are paid per diem at the most current rates.

EFFECTIVE DATES: October 1, 2007.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document gives notice of revisions in 
per diem rates prescribed by the for non-foreign areas outside the 
continental United States. It supersedes Civilian Personnel Per Diem 
Bulletin Number 254. Distribution of Civilian Personnel Per Diem 
Bulletins by mail was discontinued. Per Diem Bulletins published 
periodically in the Federal Register now constitute the only 
notification of revisions in per diem rates to agencies and 
establishments outside the Department of Defense. For more information 
or questions about per diem rates, please contact your local travel 
office. The text of the Bulletin follows:

    Dated: September 24, 2007.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 55184]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28SE07.342


[[Page 55185]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28SE07.343


[[Page 55186]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28SE07.344


[[Page 55187]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28SE07.345

[FR Doc. 07-4782 Filed 9-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Exhibit 10.3


 


Employment Agreement Addendum I


Addendum
to agreement dated February 17, 2019


 


This
first addendum to the employment agreement (the “Addendum”) is made this 10th day of March 2020, by and
between OptimizeRx, Corporation (the “Company”), a Nevada Company, and Douglas Baker (the “Executive”).


 


Base
Salary: The Executive will receive a base salary at the annualized rate of $260,000.00 (“Base Salary”), which
will be paid in accordance with normal Company payroll practices and subject to the usual and applicable required withholding(s).



 


Effective
Date: January 1, 2020


 


Acknowledgment:


 


Except
as expressly set forth herein, all other terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.


 





	OptimizeRx,
    Corporation	 	Douglas
    Baker
	 	 	 
	By:	Will
    Febbo	 	By:	Douglas
    P. Baker
	Its:	Chief
    Executive Officer	 	Date:	March
    10, 2020
	Date:	March
    10, 2020
Case 1:07-cv-03548-LAK Document 7 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03548-LAK Document 7 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### GARDNER v. GARDNER

No. 87 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 334.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 May 1979.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. SECTION 10A, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Thomas Cooke, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Saratoga Resources, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) [omitted in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];



c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                       |  |                         |  | 
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Date: January 25, 2006 |  | /s/ Thomas Cooke        |  | 
|                       |  | Thomas Cooke            |  | 
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer |  |