alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Dunlop Standard Aerospace
Holdings plc (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
David W. Shaw, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David E. Unruh,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ DAVID W. SHAW
-------------------------------
Name:  David W. Shaw
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  July 3, 2003


/s/ DAVID E. UNRUH
-------------------------------
Name:  David E. Unruh
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  July 3, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 9 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-32 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense Office of Inspector General.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the appointment of the members of the Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board (PRB) for the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General (DoD OIG), as required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB provides fair and impartial review of SES performance appraisals and makes recommendations regarding performance ratings and performance awards to the Inspector General.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

October 4, 2007.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Phyllis Hughes, Director, Human Capital Advisory Services, Administration and Management, DoD OIG, 400 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA 22202, (703) 602-4516.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the following executives are appointed to the DoD OIG, PRB:

Charles E. Coe, Jr., Assistant Inspector General for Information Technology Audits and Computer Crime Investigations, Department of Education.

Andrew Patchan, Assistant Inspector General for Auditing, General Services Administration.

                    Dennis S. Schindel, Acting Inspector General, Department of the Treasury.                          ( print page 56339)    

Linda Snider, Assistant Inspector General for Resource Management, Department of Energy.

Norbert E. Vint, Deputy Inspector General, Office of Personnel Management.

Dated: September 27, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 07-4876 Filed 10-2-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
EXHIBIT 12.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Apostolos Tamvakakis, certify that:

Date: June 23, 2011

/s/ APOSTOLOS TAMVAKAKIS Apostolos Tamvakakis Chief Executive Officer


---



CERTIFICATION

I,
Anthimos Thomopoulos, certify that:

Date: June 23, 2011

/s/ ANTHIMOS THOMOPOULOS Anthimos Thomopoulos Deputy Chief Executive Officer


---



CERTIFICATION

I,
Charalampos Mazarakis, certify that:

Date: June 23, 2011

/s/ CHARALAMPOS MAZARAKIS Charalampos Mazarakis Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
`[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 192 (Thursday, October 4, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 56871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4952]



[[Page 56869]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part III





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Memorandum of September 28, 2007--Assignment of Specified Reporting and 
Determination Functions Relating to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi 
Arabia, and Certain Education Abroad



Presidential Determination No. 2007-34 of September 28, 2007--
Presidential Determination on Energy Assistance for the Democratic 
People's Republic of Korea



Presidential Determination No. 2007-35 of September 28, 2007--Waiver of 
Limitation on Obligation and Expenditure of $1,051.6 Million in Fiscal 
Year 2007 Economic Support Funds for Iraq
 
 
                         Presidential Documents 
 
 

  Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 192 / Thursday, October 4, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents  

 ___________________________________________________________________

 Title 3--
 The President

[[Page 56871]]

                Memorandum of September 28, 2007

                
Assignment of Specified Reporting and 
                Determination Functions Relating to Afghanistan, 
                Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Certain Education Abroad

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary 
                of Defense[, and] the Director of National Intelligence

                By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by 
                the Constitution and the laws of the United States, 
                including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I 
                hereby assign to the Secretary of State the functions 
                of the President under sections 2041(d)(3), 2042(c)(1), 
                2042(d), and 2043(c)(1) of the Implementing 
                Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 
                (Public Law 110-53)(the ``9/11 Act'') and section 
                7114(b)(6) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism 
                Prevention Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-458), as 
                amended.

                The Secretary of State shall consult with:

(1) the Secretary of Defense in the performance of the functions in section 
2041(d)(3) of the 9/11 Act; and

(2) the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence in 
the performance of the functions in section 2043(c)(1) of the 9/11 Act.

                The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to 
                publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
                
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, September 28, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-4952
Filed 10-3-07; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P`
EXHIBIT  99.6
                                                                   -------------

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,  Jerry  Collazo,  certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Worldwide Wireless Networks, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the annual period
ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such  Form  10-KSB  fairly  presents  in  all  material  respects  the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Worldwide  Wireless  Networks, Inc.



By:           /S/
        -----------------
Name:   Jerry  Collazo
        --------------
Title:  Acting  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer
        -----------------------------------------------------------------


                                        1
<PAGE>
#### MANUFACTURING CO. v. LOGAN TONTZ CO.

No. 117 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 496.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 June 1979.
#### STATE v. HATTIE BELL BURTON.

(Filed 28 February, 1962.)

1. Appeal and Error § 41; Criminal Law § 155—

Where all of the evidence of a particular character is stricken except evidence first elicited by defendant on cross-examination, with respect to which there is no objection or exception, defendant cannot complain.

a. Appeal and Error § 19; Criminal Law § 154—

An assignment of error which fails to present the error relied on without the necessity of going beyond the assignment itself is ineffective.

Winborne, C.J., not sitting.

Appeal by defendant from *Copeland, S.J.,*August 1961 Special Term Of CRAVEN.

This is a criminal action. The bill of indictment charges that defendant, Hattie Bell Burton, assaulted Frank Burton (her husband) with a deadly weapon, with intent to kill, inflicting serious injury not resulting in death. Defendant pleads not guilty.

The State’s evidence tends to show: On 28 May 1961 a police officer was called to the Burton home. He met Frank on the porch and went in the house with him in order for Frank to get some clothes. In the officer’s presence defendant told Frank that if he came back in the house that night she was going to kill him. The officer left as Frank was leaving the house. About 45 minutes later the officer went to the hospital in response to a call. He found Frank at the hospital with a pistol wound in his wrist. The officer obtained a warrant and arrested defendant. At the time of the arrest defendant stated to the officer that she had shot Frank with a pistol and should have killed him.

Defendant offered no evidence. The court submitted the case to the jury on the lesser and included offense of assault with a deadly weapon. The jury returned a verdict of guilty.

The court entered judgment and imposed an active 12 months prison sentence.

Defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General McGal-liard for the State.*

*Charles L. Abernethy, Jr., for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The assignments of error are without merit. The crucial assignments relate to the admission of certain testimony of the arresting officer as to what Frank Burton told him in the absence of defendant. The only testimony of this character admitted and not *465stricken was first elicited by defendant on cross-examination, and with respect to which there was no objection or exception. Furthermore, these assignments are not sufficient in form to present the errors relied on without the necessity of going beyond the assignments themselves to learn what the questions are. Rule 21, Rules of Practice in Supreme Court; *Lowie & Co. v. Atkins,*245 N.C. 98, 95 S.E. 2d 271. See 1 Strong: N.C. Index, Appeal and Error, s. 19, p. 90.

The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. The punishment is not in excess of that provided by law.

No error.

WiNBORN®, C.J., not sitting.
Case 1:07-cv-03480-AKH     Document 8      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03480-AKH     Document 8      Filed 09/06/2007     Page 2 of 2
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2105 

To amend the Clean Air Act to clarify when a physical change in, or change 

in the method of operation of, a stationary source constitutes a modification, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 11, 2019 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Clean Air Act to clarify when a physical 

change in, or change in the method of operation of, 

a stationary source constitutes a modification, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF MODIFICA4 TION. 

5 Section 111(a)(4) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 7411(a)(4)) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘(4) The term ‘modification’ 

8 means’’ and inserting the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2105 IS

1 ‘‘(4) MODIFICATION.— 

2 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘modifica3 tion’ means’’; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(B) ASSOCIATED DEFINITION.—For pur6 poses of subparagraph (A), a physical change 

7 in, or change in the method of operation of, a 

8 stationary source shall be considered to increase 

9 the amount of any air pollutant emitted by the 

10 stationary source only if the maximum achiev11 able hourly emissions rate of the stationary 

12 source after the change will be higher than— 

13 ‘‘(i) the maximum achievable hourly 

14 emissions rate of the stationary source as 

15 the stationary source was originally de16 signed; and 

17 ‘‘(ii) the maximum hourly emissions 

18 rate of the stationary source that was ac19 tually achieved during the 10-year period 

20 preceding the change.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### STATE v. CHAUFFE

No. 98 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 501.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 24 January 1978. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 24 January 1978.
EXHIBIT
32.1

















CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the quarterly report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Marc S. Hermelin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




















Date:  September
      24, 2008
            /s/ Marc S. Hermelin
              Marc
      S. Hermelin
              Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)
#### JONES v. NEW HANOVER HOSPITAL

No. 104P82.

Case below: 55 N.C. App. 545.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 May 1982.
Case 1:07-cr-00362-LBS Document 7 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### ROBERSON v. GRIFFETH

No. 359P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 227.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 August 1982.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

-- -- -- --

NO. 16-0035

IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.M., A

CHILD

§

§

§

§

§

§

Dallas County,

5th District.

February 26, 2016

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.M., A CHILD, pay all

costs incurred on this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 7th day of April, 2016.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Broadcasting Board of Governors

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Persons interested in obtaining more information should contact Carol Booker at (202) 203-4545.

Dated: November 30, 2005.

Carol Booker,

Legal Counsel.

[FR Doc. 05-23685 Filed 12-1-05; 3:26 pm]

BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
#### STATE v. SIMMONS

No. 50 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 165.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 12 January 1982.
# or,lciroAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 18-0282
IN RE THE PARENTING OF D.I.B., a Minor Child, NICHOLAS R.BRACCIALE,

Petitioner and Appellant,
v. GAIL A.SULLIVAN,f/k/a GAIL ANN INGELS,

Respondent and Appellee. 

# FILED JUN 1 6 2020 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Thismatter is an appeal from the Thirteenth Judicial District Court's March 23,2018 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order amending the parenting plan for the parties'now fifteen-year-old daughter,D.I.B. By order dated July 3,2018,this Courtstayed the District Court's order through the pendency of the appeal. Since that time, we have entered two orders holding the appeal in abeyance while the parties attempted to work with D.I.B.'s therapist in a reintegration process. Our lastorder for abeyance directed the filing of status reports by September 18, 2020. Appellee Gail Sullivan now seeks to modify the stay to permit her to "seek enforcement in District Court ofthe parties'mediated agreement that was to serve as the parties' parenting plan pending appeal." Appellant Nicholas Bracciale responds that D.I.B.'s condition has not improved and thathertreating psychiatristhasrecommended that D.I.B. be placed in a residential treatment facility, which may occur by July. Nicholas represents that "Mlle argumenthere,from Nick's pointofview,is entirely factual. Assuch, maybe it would be more appropriate for theDistrict Courtto deal with it." The Courtagrees. This matter has been pending for more than two years, and it now appears that the parties are at an impasse regarding the next step forward. As such,it is appropriate that the District Court consider any factual disputes about D.I.B.'s arrangements with her parents. 06/16/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0282IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the stay previously entered by this Court is

MODIFIED to allow the District Courtto considerD.I.B.'s currentcondition and the parties' circumstances to determine whether enforcement or further amendments to the amended parenting plan are appropriate. This Court's order requiring status reports by September 18, 2020,remains in effect. The parties are directed to address in that report whether this appeal should be dismissed without prejudice to their right to appeal further parenting orders entered in this matter. The Clerk is directed to provide immediate notice of this Order to all counsel of record in Yellowstone County Cause No. DR 06-60 and to the Thirteenth Judicial District Court,the Hon.Donald L.Harris,presiding. Dated this I L day ofJune, 2020.

ChiefJustice
Case 1:07-cv-03409-THK     Document 3      Filed 05/15/2007     Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of One Voice Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dean
Weber, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








May
      18, 2009/s/
      Dean WeberPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)interim
      Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      accounting and financial officer),Chairman
      of the Board and Secretary






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
One Voice Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by One Voice Technologies,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon
request.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                  ------------



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Marc S. Hermelin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.




Date: June 25, 2008                         /s/ Marc S. Hermelin
                                   -----------------------------------------
                                               Marc S. Hermelin
                                     Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer)