alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000059584
<NAME> ALIANT COMMUNICATIONS CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           18766
<SECURITIES>                                      6520
<RECEIVABLES>                                    29483
<ALLOWANCES>                                       298
<INVENTORY>                                       6496
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 67085
<PP&E>                                          503584
<DEPRECIATION>                                  290109
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  295378
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            59681
<BONDS>                                          44000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       4499
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                      133203
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    295378
<SALES>                                           2994
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                101306
<CGS>                                             1549
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    68782
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1984
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   139
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2263
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  30540
<INCOME-TAX>                                     11668
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              18872
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     18760 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                18759.951   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                18759.951
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03525-PKL Document 9 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03525-PKL Document 9 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03525-PKL Document 9 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03525-PKL Document 9 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03525-PKL Document 9 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03525-PKL Document 9 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03525-PKL Document 9 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 7 of 7
#### EQUILEASE CORP. v. HOTEL CORP.

No. 24 PC.

Case below: 42 N.C. App. 436.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1979.
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hollywood Casino Shreveport and
Subsidiaries and of Shreveport Capital Corporation (collectively, the Companies) for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Paul C. Yates, Chief Financial Officer of HCS I, Inc.,
Managing General Partner of the Companies, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the Companies
financial condition and results of operations.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



February 26, 2003



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/    PAUL C.
YATES                             
|Paul C. Yates Chief Financial Officer HCS I, Inc.
#### CONNER v. ROYAL GLOBE INSUR. CO.

No. 173P82.

Case below: 56 N.C. App. 1.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 July 1982.
International Association of

WILDLAND FIRE

November 21, 2022

Kenny Fent, PhD, CIH

National Firefighter Registry

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Dear Dr. Fent, 

On behalf of the International Association of Wildland Fire Board of Directors we 

are pleased to provide this letter of support for the National Firefighter Registry. 

We are committed to getting the word out to our community about this important opportunity designed to help all of us better understand cancer in the U.S. 

fire service. 

We know that firefighters have a greater risk for some types of cancer due to 

their exposure to smoke and hazardous chemical and we are grateful that the 

NFR will help us all better understand the connection between firefighting and 

cancer among all U.S. firefighters. 

Please continue to share your campaign materials will us and we will share them 

with our members. In addition, our communication committee will discuss our 

own campaign around the NFR. 

Thank you for your dedication to this very important issue, we look forward to 

our continued partnership.

Sincerely,

------------------------------------------------------

Joaquin Ramirez, Ph.D.

Founder

Technosylva Inc.

+1 (858)-729-3648

EXECUTIVE 

COMMITTEE

President

Chairman, Board of Directors

Joaquin Ramirez, USA

Vice President

Vice Chairman, Board of Directors

Steven Miller, USA

Secretary

Michele Steinberg, USA 

Treasurer

Sara McAllister, USA

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Amy Cardinal Christianson, Canada

Tom Harbour, USA

Sarah Harris, Australia

Travor Howard, Australia

Xinyan Huang, China

Adam Leavesley, Australia

Kelly Martin, USA

Michael Norton, Canada

Núria Prat-Guitart, Spain

Amber Soja, USA

Naomi Stevens, Australia

Johnny Stowe, USA

Gavriil Xanthopoulos, Greece

STAFF

Executive Director

Mikel Robinson, USA

execdir@iawfonline.org

Publishers of Wildfire Magazine®

and the scientific publication 

International Journal of Wildland Fire® . 

1418 Washburn Street • Missoula, Montana, USA 59801

(406) 531-8264 • (888) 440 – IAWF (4293) • www.iawfonline.org

UNITING THE GLOBAL WILDLAND FIRE COMMUNITY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          11,359
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,424
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,667
<INVENTORY>                                    140,437
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               281,237
<PP&E>                                         298,785
<DEPRECIATION>                                 178,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 425,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           79,741
<BONDS>                                         31,370
<COMMON>                                        37,444
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     267,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   425,243
<SALES>                                        439,957
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               439,957
<CGS>                                          305,017
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  305,017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,559
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 61,903
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,126
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,777
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,777
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                       AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Abazias, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jesus Diaz, acting in the
capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  April 11, 2005 |  | BY: /s/ Jesus Diaz
Jesus Diaz CEO and CFO
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
#### STATE v. JOHNSTON

No. 12 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 179.

Petition by defendant Johnston for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 March 1979. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 6 March 1979.
# C_2011244EN.01000101.xml

| 23.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/1

---

Commission communication on the body authorised to issue certificates of authenticity under Regulation (EC) No 620/2009

2011/C 244/01

Council Regulation (EC) No 617/2009 of 13 July 2009, published in
  Official Journal of the European Union L 182 of 15 July 2009, opened an import tariff quota for high-quality beef.

Official Journal of the European Union

Under Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 620/2009 of 13 July 2009, the release into free circulation of the products imported under that quota is conditional upon presentation of a certificate of authenticity.

The following authority is authorised to issue certificates of authenticity under the Regulation.

| Dirección General de Servicios Ganaderos |
| --- |
| División Industria Animal |
| Constituyente 1476, Piso 2 |
| Montevideo |
| URUGUAY |
| Tel. +598 24126369 |
| Fax +598 24126304 |
| E-mail: digesega@mgap.gub.uy |
| Internet: http://www.mgap.gub.uy/DGSG |

Dirección General de Servicios Ganaderos

División Industria Animal

Constituyente 1476, Piso 2

Montevideo

URUGUAY

Tel. +598 24126369

Fax +598 24126304

E-mail: digesega@mgap.gub.uy

Internet: http://www.mgap.gub.uy/DGSG

---
The Declaration of FTI (by Douglas E. Smith), dated

October 17, 2007, including Exhibit 1 To Be Filed

Under Seal.

Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 77 Filed 10/19/2007 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011172DE.01002201.xml

| 11.6.2011 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 172/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2011

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 172/22

---

Berichtigung der Mitteilung der Kommission — Leitlinien zur Anwendbarkeit von Artikel 101 des Vertrags über die Arbeitsweise der Europäischen Union auf Vereinbarungen über horizontale Zusammenarbeit

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 11 vom 14. Januar 2011
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 11 vom 14. Januar 2011

2011/C 172/11

Seite 48, Randnummer 223, Beispiel 3, letzter Satz:

anstatt:

„Es ist daher unwahrscheinlich, dass die Einkaufsgemeinschaft wettbewerbsbeschränkende Auswirkungen im Sinne von Artikel 101 Absatz 3 erfüllt.“

muss es heißen:

„Es ist daher unwahrscheinlich, dass die Einkaufsgemeinschaft wettbewerbsbeschränkende Auswirkungen im Sinne von Artikel 101 Absatz 1 hat.“

Seite 51, Randnummer 241:

anstatt:

„Beträgt der gemeinsame Marktanteil der Parteien mehr als 15 %, so fällt die Vermarktungsvereinbarung nicht mehr unter die Gruppenfreistellung von Randnummer 240 und muss sie auf ihre voraussichtlichen Auswirkungen auf den Wettbewerb geprüft werden.“

muss es heißen:

„Beträgt der gemeinsame Marktanteil der Parteien mehr als 15 %, so fällt die Vermarktungsvereinbarung nicht mehr in den geschützten Bereich von Randnummer 240 und muss auf ihre voraussichtlichen Auswirkungen auf den Wettbewerb geprüft werden.“

Seite 52, Randnummer 250, dritter Satz:

anstatt:

„Je mehr Marktmacht die an dem Informationsaustausch beteiligten Parteien haben, desto unwahrscheinlicher ist es, dass die Effizienzgewinne an die Verbraucher in einem Maße weitergegeben werden, das sie die wettbewerbsbeschränkenden Auswirkungen überwiegen.“

muss es heißen:

„Je mehr Marktmacht die Parteien haben, desto unwahrscheinlicher ist es, dass die Effizienzgewinne an die Verbraucher in einem Maße weitergegeben werden, dass sie die wettbewerbsbeschränkenden Auswirkungen überwiegen.“

---
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                ------------




                 K-V PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gerald R. Mitchell, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
         of the Company.



/s/ Gerald R. Mitchell
-----------------------------------------------------
Gerald R. Mitchell
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
Case 1:07-cv-03593-SAS Document 2 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
31.2





RULE
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS





I, Zhong Ya Li,
certify that:





1.I have reviewed this
Annual Report on Form 10-k of GFR Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”).





2.Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;





3.Based on my knowledge, the
financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;





4.The Company’s other
certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15d-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:





(a)Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the Company, including its consolidates subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;





(b)Evaluated the
effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and





(c)Disclosed in this report
any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting; and





5.The Company’s other
certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the
audit committee of Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):





(a)All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and





(b)Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date:
April 29, 2009





By:
              /s/Zhong Ya
  LiZhong Ya Li
#### SHIRLEY S. BEASLEY v. DWIGHT R. BEASLEY

No. 66

(Filed 5 February 1979)

Divorce and Alimony § 24.9— contempt for willful failure to comply with child support order

Decision of the Court of Appeals affirming an order of the district court holding defendant in contempt for willful failure to comply with a child support order is affirmed by the Supreme Court.

Justices Britt and Brock did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

APPEAL pursuant to G.S. 7A-30(2) by defendant from a decision of the Court of Appeals, 37 N.C. App. 255, 245 S.E. 2d 820, opinion by *Judge Morris,*now Chief Judge, in which *Judge Vaughn*concurred. *Judge Robert M. Martin*dissented. The decision affirmed a judgment of the district court entered by *Judge Beaman*on 22 July 1977, in which defendant was found in contempt of court for wilfully failing to comply with an order of the district court requiring him to provide support payments for his two minor children in the sum of $50.00 per week.

*Aldridge and Seawell, by Christopher L. Seawell and Daniel D. Khoury, Attorneys for plaintiff appellee.*

*Leroy, Wells, Shaw, Homthai, Riley & Shearin, P.A., by John G. Gaw, Jr., Attorneys for defendant appellant.*

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully studied the records in this case, the opinions filed in the Court of Appeals and the briefs of the parties. In defense of an order to show cause why he should not be held in contempt defendant husband testified that because of his personal expenses he could not afford to pay child support as ordered; therefore he had not wilfully violated the order. He also testified that from 20 October 1972 until the time of the hearing in district court on 17 June 1977 he had been able to pay $35.00 per week for the support of his two minor children under an earlier court order. Most of this time he earned only $90.00 per week take home pay. On 8 February 1977 the district court increased these support payments to $50.00 per week. At that time, the record *581indicates, defendant was, and has been since, earning $760.00 per month take home pay.

There is no difference between the parties or between the majority and dissenting opinions in the Court of Appeals as to the legal principles which govern this case. The differences lie in the application of the principles to the facts here presented. We believe the opinion of Judge, now Chief Judge, Morris correctly applies proper principles of law to these facts. The decision of the Court of Appeals is, therefore,

Affirmed.

Justices BRITT and BROCK did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
#### STATE v. MUSUMECI

No. 144 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 88.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1977.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2035 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2035

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 11, 2019

             Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To require the Transportation Security Administration to develop a 
   strategic plan to expand eligibility for the PreCheck Program to 
 individuals with Transportation Worker Identification Credentials or 
                   Hazardous Materials Endorsements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TSA Credential and Endorsement 
Harmonization Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. STRATEGIC PLAN TO EXPAND PRECHECK PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Transportation Security 
Administration shall develop a strategic plan to expand eligibility for 
the PreCheck Program under section 44919 of title 49, United States 
Code, to individuals who have--
            (1) a Transportation Worker Identification Credential 
        issued under section 70105 of title 46, United States Code; or
            (2) a Hazardous Materials Endorsement under the Hazardous 
        Materials Endorsement Threat Assessment Program on the State-
        issued commercial driver's license of the individual.
    (b) Elements.--In developing the strategic plan required by 
subsection (a), the Administrator shall ensure that the plan--
            (1) allows individuals described in subsection (a) to opt 
        in to the PreCheck Program; and
            (2) provides the Transportation Security Administration 
        with the discretion--
                    (A) to determine whether an individual described in 
                subsection (a) meets the eligibility requirements for 
                the Program; and
                    (B) to establish alternative fee structures for the 
                Program.
    (c) Briefing to Congress.--Not later than 30 days after developing 
the strategic plan required by subsection (a), the Administrator shall 
brief the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the 
Senate and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of 
Representatives on the strategic plan.

            Passed the Senate September 10, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### PERRY v. PERRY

No. 134 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 139.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1977.