alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 / Presidential Documents 72063 

Proclamation 7966 of November 28, 2005 

National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day, 2005 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

On National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day, we pray for those lost on 

December 7, 1941, and we honor the courage of a generation of Americans 

who devoted themselves to one of the great missions in our country’s history. 

After the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor took more than 2,400 American 

lives, millions of our citizens answered the call to defend our liberty, and 

the world witnessed the power of freedom to overcome tyranny. 

Liberty’s ultimate triumph was far from clear in the early days of World 

War II. When our country was attacked at Pearl Harbor, America was emerging from the Great Depression, and several nations had larger armies than 

the United States. In Asia and Europe, country after country had fallen 

before the armies of militaristic tyrants. However, the brave and determined 

men and women of our Nation maintained their faith in the power of 

freedom and democracy. They fought and won a world war against two 

of the most ruthless regimes the world has ever known. In the years since 

those victories, the power of freedom and democracy has transformed America’s enemies in World War II into close friends. 

Today, our goal is to continue to spread freedom and democracy and to 

secure a more peaceful world for our children and grandchildren. We are 

grateful to the men and women who are defending our flag and our freedom 

in the first war of the 21st century. These patriots are protecting our country 

and our way of life by upholding the tradition of honor, bravery, and 

integrity demonstrated by those who fought for our Nation in World War 

II. The service and sacrifice of our World War II veterans continue to 

inspire people across our country, and we remain deeply grateful for all 

that these heroes have done for the cause of freedom. 

The Congress, by Public Law 103–308, as amended, has designated December 

7 of each year as ‘‘National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day.’’ 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim December 7, 2005, as National Pearl Harbor 

Remembrance Day. I encourage all Americans to observe this solemn occasion 

with appropriate ceremonies and activities. I urge all Federal agencies, interested organizations, groups, and individuals to fly the flag of the United 

States at half-staff this December 7 in honor of those who died as a result 

of their service at Pearl Harbor. 

72064 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-eighth 

day of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth. 

W 

[FR Doc. 05–23550 

Filed 11–29–05; 9:09 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. 

The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Human Genome Research Institute Initial Review Group; Genome Research Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         November 8-9, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         November 8, 2007, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Terrace Level Conference Room, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Time:*                         November 9, 2007, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hilton Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD  20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Keith McKenney, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, NHGRI, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, MSC 9306, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-594-4280,                         *mckenneyk@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: October 2, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-4977  Filed 10-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Chief Financial
Officer of Siena Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that:

      (1)   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
            December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


February 13, 2003                       By /S/ W. JOSEPH DRYER
                                             W. Joseph Dryer
                                          Chief Financial Officer
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ROBERT D. ALLEN,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv68-RH/WCS

THE CHRONICLE, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

There has been no action in this case since May 11, 2010, when I granted two

motions for extensions of time, docs. 10-11, for Defendants to file their answer to the

amended complaint. Doc. 12. Defendants are in default. See docs. 12, 13. Plaintiff,

who is pro se, has not filed anything since March 31, 2010. Docs. 6, 7. 

An order to show cause was entered on November 2, 2010, requiring Plaintiff to

demonstrate good cause as to why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to

prosecute. Doc. 13. Under N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 41.1(A), when no activity has occurred for

a period of more than ninety days, a party may be ordered to show cause why the case

should not be dismissed. Plaintiff was advised that failure to respond to the order by the

November 15th deadline would result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed

for want of prosecution. Doc. 13. Plaintiff did not respond.
Page 2 of 2

Plaintiff has the burden of proof in this case, and the responsibility to prosecute it

with diligence. Despite the fact that Defendants are also in default, the remedy is to

dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute.

In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be

DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and the Clerk of Court be directed to

administratively close this action.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on November 24, 2010.

 s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days

after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the

scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:10cv68-RH/WCS
#### ACCEPTANCE CORP. v. DAVID

No. 105 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 559.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 May 1977.
Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 27-24      Filed 05/22/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 27-24      Filed 05/22/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 27-24      Filed 05/22/2008     Page 3 of 3
| 1. | The Form 10-K report of Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. that this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Form 10-K report of Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. that this certification accompanies fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        | By:    | /s/ Christopher J. Calhoun |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
| Dated:  March 11, 2011 |   | Christopher J. Calhoun     |
|                        |   | Chief Executive Officer    |
|                        |   |                       |
|                        | By:    | /s/ Mark E. Saad           |
| Dated:  March 11, 2011 |   | Mark E. Saad               |
|                        |   | Chief Financial Officer    |

----
#### STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. 54 PC.

No. 23 (Spring Term).

Case below: 42 N.C. App. 662.

Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 6 November 1979.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Edward Hebert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Saratoga Resources, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Saratoga Resources, Inc.





| |        |                         
| | ------ | ------------------------
| | By:    | /s/ Edward Hebert       
| | Name:  | Edward Hebert           
| | Title: | Vice President  Finance
| | Dated: | April 15, 2009
Case 7:07-cv-03336-SCR Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03336-SCR Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 2 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03336-SCR Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 3 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03336-SCR Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 4 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03336-SCR Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 5 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03336-SCR Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 6 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03336-SCR Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 7 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03336-SCR Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 8 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03336-SCR Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 9 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03336-SCR Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 10 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03241-RJH-MHD Document 33 Filed 02/13/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03241-RJH-MHD Document 33 Filed 02/13/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### BULLARD v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.

No. 4 PC.

Case below: 42 N.C. App. 370.

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1979.
#### Cohen & Hargrove, plaintiffs in error, *vs.*The Rome Railroad Company, defendant in error.

The verdict in this case is not only not contrary to the testimony, but is the only verdict which, under the evidence, the jury ought to have found.

New trial. Tried before Judge Parrott. Floyd Superior Court. July Term, 1871.

Cohen & Hargrove sued the Rome Railroad Company for the non-delivery of certain goods which they averred were shipped to them from New York to Rome, over said railroad. They failed to prove that said goods were ever in possession of defendant, and the jury found for defendant. A motion for new trial upon the ground that the verdict was wrong was overruled.

Underwood & Rowell; C. D. Forsyth, for plaintiffs in error.

Printup & Fouche, for defendant.

McCay, Judge.

Whatever may be the law of the case, as argued at the hearing, on the liability of this road under the circumstances, if it were proven the lost goods had ever been in its posses*294sion, it is very clear from this record that the verdict of the jury is right. There is no proof that the Rome Railroad ever had or undertook to carry the goods sued for. Indeed, the proof is very strong, that the goods never came upon that road. It was the clear duty of the plaintiff to show this, and the judgment must therefore be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to
Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, David D. Clark, the Chief Financial Officer of Nutrisystem, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that based on the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | The Companys Form 10-K Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 5, 2010



/S/ DAVID D. CLARKExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 224 (Tuesday, November 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 70592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23066]



[[Page 70592]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee will meet in 
closed session at the Pentagon on December 8, 2005 from 0900 to 2000 
and December 9, 2005 from 0830 to 1400.
    The purpose of the meeting is to provide the Secretary of Defense, 
Deputy Secretary of Defense and Under Secretary of Defense for Policy 
with independent, informed advice on major matters of defense policy. 
The Board will hold classified discussions on national security 
matters.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law No. 92-463, as amended [5 U.S.C. App II (1982)], it has 
been determined that this meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 
552B(c)(1)(1982), and that accordingly this meeting will be closed to 
the public.

    Dated: November 15, 2005.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 05-23066 Filed 11-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-08-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1785

ILESANMI ODUNWOLE LAROJA,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A76-588-504)

Submitted: June 19, 2003 Decided: July 8, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joshua A. Moses, JOSHUA MOSES & ASSOCIATES, Silver Spring,

Maryland, for Petitioner. Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant

Attorney General, Mary Jane Candaux, Senior Litigation Counsel,

Audrey B. Hemesath, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ilesanmi Odunwole Laroja, a native and citizen of Nigeria,

petitions for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (Board) affirming without opinion the Immigration Judge’s

(IJ) denial of asylum and withholding of removal. 

Laroja challenges the IJ’s negative credibility finding,

asserting that the IJ misunderstood his testimony, placed too much

weight on minor inconsistencies, and that the IJ’s findings were

contrary to the evidence in the record. We have thoroughly reviewed

the record in light of the IJ’s findings and conclude that Laroja’s

assertions are without merit. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4) (2000);

Rusu v. INS, 296 F.3d 316, 323 (4th Cir. 2002); Matter of S-A-,

Int. Dec. 3433 (BIA 2000); Matter of A-S-, 21 I. & N. Dec. 1106

(BIA 1998).

Laroja also contends that the Board abused its discretion in

affirming the IJ’s findings without opinion and failed to properly

evaluate his appeal. As these claims are merely mentioned in

Laroja’s brief and are entirely undeveloped, we find that they have

been abandoned. Edwards v. City of Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241

n.6 (4th Cir. 1999).

We accordingly deny Laroja’s petition for review. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
3

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Southwark Towers
32 London Bridge Street
London SE1 9SY
Telephone +44 (0) 20 7583 5000
Facsimile +44 (0) 20 7833 4652 The Directors
Barclays Bank PLC
1234 Pavilion Drive
Northampton
NN4 7SG The Directors
Gracechurch Card Funding (No. 3) PLC
54 Lombard Street
London
EC3P 3AH The Directors
Barclaycard Funding PLC
54 Lombard Street
London
EC3P 3AH The Directors
Gracechurch Receivables Trustee Limited
26 New Street
St. Helier
Jersey
JE2 3RA February 28, 2005 Dear Sirs Report of Independent Accountants We have examined managements assertions that Barclays Bank PLC (the Servicer), a wholly owned
subsidiary of Barclays PLC, has complied with its obligations, in its capacity as Servicer, in
respect of the minimum servicing requirements for the credit card receivables




---



##### 



arising on designated
accounts as set forth in the clauses 2.1.d, 2.1.e, 2.1.f, 2.1.j, 2.2.a, 2.5.a and 2.5.b, using
definitions set forth in the Master Definitions schedule between Gracechurch Receivables Trustee
Limited, Barclays Bank PLC and Barclaycard Funding PLC dated 24 October 2002 of the Beneficiaries
Servicing Agreement between Barclaycard Funding PLC and Barclays Bank PLC dated 23 November 1999
(BSA) during the year ended 31 December 2004 . Management is responsible for the assertion. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the assertion based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting managements assertion about the Servicers compliance with those requirements
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide
a legal determination on the Servicers compliance with specified servicing requirements. In our opinion,managements assertion that the Servicer complied with the aforementioned
requirements during the year ended 31 December 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects.  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 28 February 2005 Yours faithfully, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  End of Filing
# C_2011105EN.01000701.xml

| 5.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 105/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 105/7

---

Communication

2011/C 105/04

In accordance with Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994, the Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic hereby submits for publication in the Official Journal of the European Union an application from the contracting entity Basgas Energia Czech s.r.o. for the establishment of an exploration area for the prospection of oil and natural gas deposits.

Official Journal of the European Union

The Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic has received an application from contracting entity Basgas Energia Czech s.r.o. for the establishment of the ‘Berounka’ exploration area for the prospection of oil and natural gas deposits. This application was submitted in accordance with Act No 62/1988 on geological works, as amended. The application concerns an area of irregular polygonal shape, measuring 92,62 km2, in central Bohemia. The area is demarcated by a line drawn approximately between the following settlements: Zbuzany, Beroun, Měňany, Srbsko, Karlštejn, Kosoř and Ořech.

2

The contracting entity is applying for a five-year authorisation to explore the area, starting from the date of entry into force of the relevant decision.

Competing applications for the establishment of an exploration area for the prospection of oil and natural gas deposits in the above mentioned area may be submitted, within 90 days of the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union, to the Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic, Department for Protection of the Geological and Soil Environment. Contact address: Vršovická 65, 100 10 Praha 10, Czech Republic.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
#### YATES MOTOR CO. v. SIMMONS

No. 161 PC.

Case below: 51 N.C. App. 339.

Petition by defendants Noells for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 July 1981.
This Survey Report and any recommendations made herein are for the specific facility evaluated and may not be universally applicable. Any 

recommendations made are not to be considered as final statements of NIOSH policy or of any agency or individual involved. Additional NIOSH 

Survey Reports are available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/surveyreports.