alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1984 

To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 

to provide fisheries disaster relief for commercial fishery failures that 

are due to certain duties, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 26, 2019 

Mr. WYDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 

Management Act to provide fisheries disaster relief for 

commercial fishery failures that are due to certain duties, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FISHERIES DISASTER RELIEF FOR COMMER4 CIAL FISHERY FAILURES DUE TO CERTAIN 

5 DUTIES. 

6 Section 312(a)(1)(B) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fish7 ery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 

8 1861a(a)(1)(B)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1984 IS

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘(i)’’ before ‘‘regulatory restric2 tions’’; and 

3 (2) by inserting ‘‘or (ii) increases in duties on 

4 any United States seafood products (within the 

5 meaning of the term ‘fish’ under section 3), or fish 

6 products, as retaliation for increases in duties im7 posed by the United States pursuant to section 232 

8 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (19 U.S.C. 

9 1862) or section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 

10 U.S.C. 2411), including increases in duties on sea11 food products pursuant to such section 301’’ after 

12 ‘‘environment’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 13.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Southwestern Resources Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.





Date:  March 28, 2008





/s/ Timo Jauristo

Timo Jauristo

Interim President and Chief Executive Officer









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
June 4, 2007 

Via: ECF & Regular Mail

United States District Court 

Southern District of New York 

500 Pearl Street 

New York, NY 10007-1312 

Attn.: Clerk of the Court 

 Re: USA v. Jose Roberto Zumaya aka “Rocky” 

 Docket No.: 1:07-mj-00643 

Dear Sir/Madam: 

 Please be advised that this office has been retained to represent the above named 

defendant. 

 Kindly note my appearance in this matter. 

 Thank you for your attention. 

 Very truly yours, 

 ADDABBO & GREENBERG 

 s/Todd D. Greenberg, Esq.

TDG:id 

Case 1:07-mj-00643 Document 7 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### D. H. BOWEN v. ANCHOR ENTERPRISES, INC.

(Filed 20 September, 1961.)

Negligence § 37f—

Evidence that defendant-proprietor mopped tbe floor of its restaurant witb a damp mop, tbe moisture from wbicb dried witbin three or four minutes, that plaintiff knew tbe mopping operation was going on, and that be fell when his crutch slipped on a damp spot on tbe floor, *is held*insufficient to warrant recovery.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Clarkson, J.,*April-May Term, 1961, RutheepoRD Superior Court.

The plaintiff instituted this civil action to recover damages for personal injury he sustained as a result of a fall while he was a customer in the Howard Johnson Restaurant operated by the defendant.

At the close of all the evidence the court entered judgment of non-suit, from which the plaintiff appealed.

*Hamrick & Hamrick, By: J. Nat Hamrick, for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Jones & Jones, By: Robert A. Jones, Hamrick & Jones, for defendant, appellee.*

*360Per Curiam.

*The*evidence disclosed that the plaintiff, using -crutches because of a recent leg amputation, slipped on the floor of defendant’s restaurant. In the fall he sustained injury. It was defendant’s custom to mop the floor three times daily, using a mop pulled through a pressure wringer. Any moisture left by the mop dries within three or four minutes. After the mop goes through the wringer, “It was not a wet mop, it is a damp mop, it does not leave residuary water on the floor.” Plaintiff knew the mopping operation was going on. He testified: “I saw the place on the floor where the crutch slipped, it was spotted damp and showed the skid marks of the crutch.”

In the light of applicable law in this State, evidence of actionable negligence is lacking. *Harris v. Montgomery Ward & Co.,*230 N.C. 485, 53 S.E. 2d 536.

The judgment of nonsuit is

Affirmed.
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH     Document 41      Filed 01/30/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH     Document 41      Filed 01/30/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH     Document 41      Filed 01/30/2008     Page 3 of 3
Exhibit
32.1






CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




PURSUANT
TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Annual Report of Symyx Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Isy Goldwasser, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United Stated Code, that
to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates and for the periods
indicated.





This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.





By:
            /s/
      Isy GoldwasserIsy
      GoldwasserChief
      Executive OfficerMarch
      17, 2008
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7242

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. RICKY MCKINLEY INGRAM , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Thomas D. Schroeder , Chief District Judge. ( 1:06

- cr - 00460

- TDS

- 1 )

Submitted : April 16, 2020 Decided : April 20, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Louis C. Allen, Federal Public Defender, Eric D. Placke, First Assistant Federal Public Defender, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Matthew G.T. Martin, United States Attorne y, Angela H. Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Through counsel, Ricky McKinley Ingram app eals the district court’s order denying his motion, filed pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, § 404, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222, for a reduction in Ingram’s 262

- month sentence. We have considered Ingram’s arguments on appeal in conjunct ion with the record and find the court did not abuse its discretion in declining to reduce Ingram’s custodial sentence. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ingram , No. 1:06

- cr 00460

- TDS

- 1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 2 1, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-10408 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RICKEY LACARDO MCGEE, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:00-CR-416-1-G

-------------------- December 14, 2001 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rickey Lacardo McGee on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Goodman has received a copy of counsel’s brief and has filed no response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous appellate issue. Consequently, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel isNo. 01-10408 -2- excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32(a)
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
I, Joseph P. Keithley, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of KeithleyInstruments, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2005which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Joseph P. Keithley    Joseph P. Keithley  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer  May 10, 2005  
A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Keithley Instruments, Inc. andwill be retained by Keithley Instruments, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Marine Accounted For From World War II (Pellerito, A.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### STATE v. WATKINS

No. 121 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 171.

Appeal dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question 17 December 1975.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000059544
<NAME> LINCOLN INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                                          280089
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    10299
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                300088
<PP&E>                                         3605330
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2359327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1546091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           452705
<BONDS>                                        1048431
<COMMON>                                        816160
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (451964)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1546091
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 74931
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   103865
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 23000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (46502)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (46502)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (46502)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Katy Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending
April 3, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, David J. Feldman, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ David J.
Feldman


David J.
Feldman


Chief
Executive Officer


May 14,
2009











The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to
accompany this report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### STATE v. JACKSON

No. 349P82.

Case below: 56 N.C. App. 607.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 13 July 1982.
The Football Association Premier League Limited et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al Doc. 114

Dockets.Justia.com
#### WRIGHT v. O’NEAL MOTORS

No. 305P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 49.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 July 1982.
United States District Court

Southern District of New York

Office of the Clerk

U.S. Courthouse

500 Pearl Street, New York, N.Y. 10007-1213

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X

 

 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

NATIONAL UTILITY SERVICE, INC.

V. 07-CV-3345

 

TIFFANY & CO. ET AL

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X 

 

Pursuant to the memorandum of the Case Processing Assistant, the above-entitled action

is reassigned to the calendar of

JUDGE SULLIVAN

 

All future documents submitted in this action are to be presented in the Clerk’s Office of

the Southern District Court for filing and shall bear the assigned judge’s initials after the case

number.

The attorney(s) for the plaintiff(s) are requested to serve a copy of the Notice of

Reassignment on all defendants.

J. Michael McMahon, CLERK

Date: 9/10/07

By: Kristin Cox

 Deputy Clerk 

 

 

cc: Attorneys of Record 

PS REASSIGNMENT FORM 

Data Quality Control Revised: March 9, 2001

Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 8 Filed 09/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
### The Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, Chief Judge, United States 1 

### District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the rep ort and recommendation of the Honorable John F. Forster, Jr. , Un itedStates Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District o f Arkansas. ___________ No. 95-2089

___________ Walter A. McCullough, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Barbara J. Fisher, Certified * Eastern District of Arkansas. Court Reporter, Craighead * County, Arkansas, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 7, 1996 Filed: March 8, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Walter A. McCullough appeals the adverse grant of summary judgmen t bythe District Court in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action. Havin g 1 reviewedthe record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the judgment of the District Court wa s correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny McCullough's motion to supple ment the record on appeal.

### -2- A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-20031

Summary Calendar

 

DORIS LEE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN J. CALLAHAN, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-96-CV-774

- - - - - - - - - -

July 18, 1997

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Doris Lee appeals the district court’s summary judgment in

favor of the Commissioner of Social Security. She contends that

the district court should have applied an equitable tolling

provision and permitted her to file a complaint challenging the

denial of disability insurance benefits, even though she did not

meet the deadline to seek judicial review.
No. 97-20031

- 2 -

We have reviewed the brief and the record and conclude that

thee is no error. For the reasons stated by the district court,

this is not the rare case that merits equitable tolling of the

limitations period. Lee v. Callahan, No. H-96-CV-774 (S.D. Tex.

Dec. 23, 1996). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Case 1:07-cv-03367-RPP Document 6-9 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, William Pulver, President and Chief Executive Officer of NetRatings, Inc. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with
Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:



Dated:
March 15, 2004

| |  |  | /s/WILLIAM PULVERWilliam Pulver President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NetRatings and will be retained by NetRatings and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
#### STEVENS v. STEVENS

No. 18 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 509.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 7 October 1975.
#### STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. 97 PC

Case below: 49 NC App 184

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 27 January 1981. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 27 January 1981.
#### IN RE SARVIS

No. 196 PC.

No. 97 (Fall Term).

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 476.

Petitions by plaintiff Sarvis and defendant Sprinkler Co. for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 29 August 1978.
#### STATE v. MOORE

No. 139 PC.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 365.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 30 March 1982.