alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffrey R. Mason, Chief Financial Officer of Rockwell Ventures
  Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i)      the
  Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended 31 May 2005
  (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)    the information
  contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: September 15, 2005

|       | /s/
      Jeffrey R. Mason | 
|------ | -------------------------- | 
|By:    | Jeffrey R. Mason           | 
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer    | 

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
  and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on
  Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company
  and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
  20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
  except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
  purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
  "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated
  by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
  the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates
  it by reference.

---



---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PENSACOLA MOTOR SALES,

a Florida corporation, d/b/a

BOB TYLER TOYOTA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:09cv571/RS-MD

EASTERN SHORE TOYOTA, LLC, an

Alabama Limited Liability Company;

DAPHNE AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, an

Alabama Limited Liability Company;

SHAWN ESFAHANI, Individually;

and DAPHNE ENTERPRISES, INC.,

an Alabama corporation,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Agreed Motion To Extend The Dispositive Motion Deadline By Two 

(2) Weeks (Doc. 56).

IT IS ORDERED that the deadline to file dispositive motions is extended to August

6, 2010.

ORDERED on June 28, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      17,595,134
<SECURITIES>                                14,029,589
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,361,448
<ALLOWANCES>                                   532,000
<INVENTORY>                                    186,780
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            50,773,987
<PP&E>                                      20,139,329
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,698,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              65,131,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,701,094
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,582
<OTHER-SE>                                  44,215,871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                65,131,583
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            71,653,799
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               49,577,715
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,282,338
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               110,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             257,605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,958,924
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,419,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,539,924
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,539,924
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.27
        

</TABLE>
Presidential Documents

57477 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 194 

Tuesday, October 9, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8185 of October 4, 2007 

German-American Day, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Generations of German Americans have helped shape our national culture 

and advance our legacy of freedom. On German-American Day, we recognize 

the many contributions that Americans of German descent have made to 

our vibrant country. 

German immigrants, in search of a brighter future, were among the first 

pioneers to settle in Jamestown. Since then, German Americans have influenced our society in all walks of life and helped expand our democratic 

heritage and our deeply held belief in individual liberty. The leadership 

and strong spirit of German Americans have helped shape our country 

and advance the great blessings of our Nation. 

German-American Day is also an opportunity to honor the strong ties between 

the United States and Germany and to celebrate our friendship. On this 

day, we underscore our commitment to working together to promote peace 

and making the world a more hopeful place. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 6, 2007, as 

German-American Day. I encourage all Americans to celebrate the many 

contributions German Americans have made to our Nation’s liberty and 

prosperity. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRD0
57478 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 9, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07–5006 

Filed 10–5–07; 8:55 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRD0GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     UT
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       

<S>                                        <C>      
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      476,821
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     30,562
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         169,355
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        87,955
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 764,693
<COMMON>                                        19,459
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       38,130
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            214,129
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 271,718
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,960
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           179,128
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  34,500
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   25,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 252,387
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  764,693
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      413,493
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            18,578
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     353,379
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     371,957
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         41,536
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,589
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  43,125
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        11,122
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,003
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         49
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   31,954
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        11,600  
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        7,802
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          49,411
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.82

<FN>
Capital-surplus-paid-in is net of $24,017 of treasury stock.



                                 Page 25
        

</TABLE>
#### John Thompson, plaintiff in error, *vs.*J. B. Fischesser and Thomas J. Heard, garnishee, defendants in error.

When a garnishee does not admit in his answer that he is *indebted,*to the defendant, or that he had any effects in his hands *belonging to*him, but states the fact that a sum of money was placed in his hands to indemnify him as security on a bail bond for the defendant, without stating who placed the money in his hands, and that he had been sued by a third party who claimed the money:

*Held,*That it was not error in the Court to refuse to allow the plaintiff to enter up a judgment against the garnishee upon the statement of facts disclosed in his answer. If the plaintiff had thought proper to have done so, he could have traversed the answer of the garnishee, and have shown that the money in his hands was the property of the defendant.

Garnishment. Before Judge Andrews. Elbert Superior Court. March Adjourned Term, 1871.

For the facts of this case, see the decision.

Robert Toombs, for plaintiff in error.

J. D. Mathews, for defendants.

Warner, Chief Justice.

In this ease Heard was served with a summons of garnishment, at the instance of Thompson, a creditor of Fischesser, requiring him to answer what he was indebted to Fischesser, or what effects he had in his hands belonging to him. Heard, the garnishee, answered that he had in his hands $500 In gold, which was placed in his hands to indemnify him against any loss or damage he might sustain in going the security of Fischesser in a bail case, at the instance of Thompson, against Fischesser; that before he was exonerated and relieved from his securityship he was served with the summons of garnishment, that since the service of the garnishment he had been sued by one Margaret Fischesser for the said $500 in gold,, which she claims to be her property, which suit is now pend*370ing in Elbert Superior Court; that the bail process against Fischesser had been dismissed.

Upon this answer of the garnishee the plaintiff moved the Court to enter up judgment for the $500 in gold, which motion was refused, and the plaintiff excepted. The garnishee does not admit in his answer that he is *indebted*to Fischesser, or that he had any effects in his hands *belonging to him,*but states the fact that the money was placed in his hands to indemnify him as security for Fischesser on his bail bond, without stating who placed the money in his hands. In our judgment it was not error in the Court below in refusing to order a judgment to be entered against the garnishee on the statement of facts contained in his answer. If the plaintiff had thought proper to do so, he could have traversed the answer of the garnishee, and have shown that the money in his bands was *the property of Fischesser.*

Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           65581
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      186
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 65767
<PP&E>                                         3502355
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2470253
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1097869
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            84780
<BONDS>                                         362634
<COMMON>                                       1281998
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (631543)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1097869
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 66018
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    87616
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               11524
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (33122)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (33122)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (33122)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (8.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (8.31)
        

</TABLE>
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-2 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 1 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-2 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 2 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-2 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 3 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-2 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 4 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-2 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 5 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-2 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 6 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-2 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 7 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-2 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 8 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-2 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 9 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-2 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 10 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-2 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 11 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-2 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 12 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-2 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 13 of 14
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-2 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 14 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03528-CM     Document 6-3      Filed 06/05/2008     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03528-CM     Document 6-3      Filed 06/05/2008     Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. LEISY

No. 155 PC

Case below: 49 NC App 546

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 January 1981. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of significant public interest allowed 6 January 1981.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2117 

To limit the authority of the Secretary of Commerce to remove Huawei 

Technologies Co. Ltd. from the entity list maintained by the Bureau 

of Industry and Security. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2019 

Mr. ROMNEY (for himself, Mr. RUBIO, and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To limit the authority of the Secretary of Commerce to 

remove Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. from the entity 

list maintained by the Bureau of Industry and Security. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Huawei Prohibition 

5 Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2117 IS

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON REMOVAL OF HUAWEI TECH2 NOLOGIES CO. LTD. FROM ENTITY LIST OF 

3 BUREAU OF INDUSTRY AND SECURITY. 

4 The Secretary of Commerce may not remove Huawei 

5 Technologies Co. Ltd. (in this section referred to as 

6 ‘‘Huawei’’) from the entity list maintained by the Bureau 

7 of Industry and Security and set forth in Supplement No. 

8 4 to part 744 of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, 

9 until the Secretary certifies to Congress that— 

10 (1) neither Huawei nor any senior officers of 

11 Huawei have engaged in actions in violation of sanc12 tions imposed by the United States or the United 

13 Nations in the 5-year period preceding the certifi14 cation; 

15 (2) Huawei has not engaged in theft of United 

16 States intellectual property in that 5-year period; 

17 (3) Huawei does not pose an ongoing threat to 

18 United States telecommunications systems or critical 

19 infrastructure; and 

20 (4) Huawei does not pose a threat to critical in21 frastructure of allies of the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### STATE v. WATKINS

No. 90 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 17.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 May 1979.
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.3 GRACECHURCH RECEIVABLES TRUSTEE LIMITED
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 I, Paul Gerard Turner, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, and all reports on
Form 6-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Gracechurch Receivables Trustee Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
reports is included in these reports;4.
    
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and
based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required
under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and5.
    
    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicers compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement. By: /s/ Paul Gerard TurnerName:
    
    Paul Gerard TurnerTitle:
    
    DirectorDate:
    
    June 30, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT DO- ' I 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF mOMCAU,Y mFT 

...... ~ .... ~~ ..... ~ .... ~~ .................... ~~ ..-. ~ .... ~ ........ ~~ ........... .~...~....~ -...~ .-.. ~~. 

SHlRE LLC, i Doc& 

. . ., ..-- 

Plaintiff, Ci"iT P;ctibj.woSo: .- ' ,.---- .- .. - 

07 Civ. 3526 (MGC) 

v. 

JOINT STIPULATION 

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. : AND ORDER FOR 

and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., EXTENSIOK OF TIME 

Defendants. ~ ..------...-.......-. ~ ...... ~ ...... ~~~~ ...... ~ ...... .~ ...... ~~~ ...... ~~ ....... ~~ ...... ~~ ..... ~~ ...... ~~... 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff Shire LLC 

("Shire") and Defendant Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. ("Teva USA"), by and through the 

undersigned counsel, subject to the Court's approval, the date for Shire's Reply to Teva USA's 

Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims is hereby extended to November 6,2007. 

There is currently no Scheduling Order in this action. Accordingly, no other dates will be 

affected by this extension. 

By: 

Edgar H. Haug (EH 6243) William J. Manning, Jr. (WM 3191) 

Porter F. Fleming (PF 1510) LOEB & LOEB. LLP 

Sandra Kuzmich (SK 5484) 345 Park Avenue 

Chiemi Suzuki (CS 41 12) New York, New York 101 54 

FROMhlER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP (212) 407-4000 

745 Fifth Avenue 

New York, New York 101 5 1 Edward H. Rice, Esq. 

(212) 588-0800 LOEB & LOEB, LLP 

321 North Clark Street 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Suite 2300 

Shire LLC Chicago, Illinois 60610 

(3 12) 464-3 129 

Attorney for Defendants, 

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and 

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. 

SO ORDERED. 

United States District Judge 

00492434 DOC 

Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 12 Filed 10/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      16,607,744
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,571,709
<ALLOWANCES>                                   270,000
<INVENTORY>                                 19,879,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            62,152,486
<PP&E>                                      18,771,450
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,330,693
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              71,593,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,573,047
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,052,524
<OTHER-SE>                                  54,169,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                71,593,243
<SALES>                                     35,246,190
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,412,886
<CGS>                                       20,520,597
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,424,155
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,988,731
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,020,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,698,331
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,968,331
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28
        

</TABLE>
#### WILMAR, INC. v. LILES and WILMAR, INC. v. POLK

No. 117 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 71.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 28 January 1972.