alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Presidential Documents 58751 

Proclamation 8191 of October 12, 2007 

White Cane Safety Day, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Our country upholds the value of every person, and all Americans deserve 

an opportunity to realize the American dream. Many citizens who are blind 

or visually impaired use white canes to achieve greater independence and 

increase mobility and productivity. On White Cane Safety Day, we celebrate 

the symbolism of the white cane, and we underscore our dedication to 

ensuring more individuals have the ability to lead active lives and achieve 

their personal and professional goals. 

My Administration is committed to helping Americans with disabilities 

live and work with greater freedom. Through the New Freedom Initiative, 

we are building on the progress of the Americans with Disabilities Act 

and helping our citizens who are blind or visually impaired gain greater 

access to the workplace, school, and community life. By working to tear 

down barriers, we are creating a society where all people are encouraged 

to reach their full potential and where the promise of our great Nation 

is accessible for everyone. 

The Congress, by joint resolution (Public Law 88–628) approved on October 

6, 1964, as amended, has designated October 15 of each year as ‘‘White 

Cane Safety Day.’’ 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim October 15, 2007, as White Cane Safety 

Day. I call upon public officials, business leaders, educators, and all the 

people of the United States to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies, 

activities, and programs. 


ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with MISCELLANEOUS
58752 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twelfth day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07–5140 

Filed 10–15–07; 8:53 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with MISCELLANEOUSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (the Company) for the
period ending July 31, 2007, I, D. Michael Parker, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended July 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended July 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 10, 2007



/s/ D. Michael ParkerD. Michael ParkerSenior Vice President, Financeand Chief Financial Officer
# C_2011032EN.01002001.xml

| 1.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/20

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 32/14

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 16.11.2010 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 16.11.2010-31.12.2010 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or Group of stocks | GHL/N3LMNO |
| Species | Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) |
| Zone | NAFO 3LMNO |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 834785 |

Date and time of closure

16.11.2010

Duration

16.11.2010-31.12.2010

Member State

Spain

Stock or Group of stocks

GHL/N3LMNO

Species

Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides)

Reinhardtius hippoglossoides

Zone

NAFO 3LMNO

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

834785

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2046 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to protect the health care 

benefits of retired public safety officers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 27, 2019 

Mr. PETERS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to protect 

the health care benefits of retired public safety officers, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Health Care 

5 for Retired Public Safety Officers Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF HEALTH CARE BENEFITS OF RE7 TIRED PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS. 

8 Title XX of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 

9 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is amended— 

10 (1) in section 2001 (6 U.S.C. 601)— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2046 IS

1 (A) by redesignating paragraphs (12), 

2 (13), and (14) as paragraphs (14), (15), and 

3 (16), respectively; 

4 (B) by redesignating paragraphs (6) 

5 through (11) as paragraphs (7) through (12), 

6 respectively; 

7 (C) by inserting after paragraph (5) the 

8 following: 

9 ‘‘(6) HEALTH CARE BENEFITS.—The term 

10 ‘health care benefits’ means health, dental, vision, 

11 prescription, and other insurance benefits.’’; and 

12 (D) by inserting after paragraph (12), as 

13 so redesignated, the following: 

14 ‘‘(13) PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER.—The term 

15 ‘public safety officer’ means an employee of a public 

16 agency— 

17 ‘‘(A) who is a law enforcement officer, fire18 fighter, or an emergency medical services re19 sponder; and 

20 ‘‘(B) whose conditions of employment are 

21 determined in accordance with a collective bar22 gaining agreement.’’; and 

23 (2) in section 2004(b)(2) (6 U.S.C. 

24 605(b)(2))— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 2046 IS

1 (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

2 ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

3 (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking the 

4 period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(D) a written certification stating that 

7 the State shall not— 

8 ‘‘(i) unilaterally modify or eliminate 

9 the health care benefits for a public safety 

10 officer retiree, as established pursuant to 

11 the collective bargaining agreement in ef12 fect at the time of retirement of the public 

13 safety officer; or 

14 ‘‘(ii) allocate grant funds to a local 

15 government or Indian tribe that has not 

16 certified to the State that the health care 

17 benefits for a public safety officer retiree, 

18 as established pursuant to the collective 

19 bargaining agreement in effect at the time 

20 of retirement of the public safety officer, 

21 shall not be unilaterally modified or elimi22 nated.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
IC 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2096 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 23, 2019 

Referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize States 

and tribal organizations that receive grants from the 

National Cemetery Administration for establishment, expansion, or improvement of a veterans’ cemeteries to 

use amounts of such grants for State and tribal organization cemetery personnel to train at the training center 

of the National Cemetery Administration, and for other 

purposes. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

S 2096 RFH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRAINING OF STATE VETERANS CEMETERY 

4 PERSONNEL BY NATIONAL CEMETERY AD5 MINISTRATION. 

6 Section 2408 of title 38, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (b)(1)— 

9 (A) in subparagraph (A)— 

10 (i) by striking ‘‘and (ii) the cost’’ and 

11 inserting ‘‘(ii) the cost’’; and 

12 (ii) by inserting ‘‘; and (iii) training 

13 costs, including travel expenses, associated 

14 with attendance at training provided by 

15 the National Cemetery Administration’’ be16 fore the semicolon; and 

17 (B) in subparagraph (B)— 

18 (i) by striking ‘‘and (ii) the cost’’ and 

19 inserting ‘‘(ii) the cost’’; and 

20 (ii) by inserting ‘‘; and (iii) training 

21 costs, including travel expenses, associated 

22 with attendance at training provided by 

23 the National Cemetery Administration’’ be24 fore the period; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

S 2096 RFH

1 (2) by redesignating subsections (c) through (f) 

2 as subsections (d) through (g), respectively; and 

3 (3) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol4 lowing new subsection (c): 

5 ‘‘(c) A grant under this section for a purpose de6 scribed in subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (a)(1) 

7 may be used, solely or in part, for training costs, including 

8 travel expenses, associated with attendance at training 

9 provided by the National Cemetery Administration.’’. 

Passed the Senate December 19, 2019. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
5/6/2009 Schmidt Eric

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

VIACOM INTERNATIONAL INC. COMEDY FigueirdDecI.Tab

PARTNERS COUNTRY MUSIC 110

TELEVISION INC. PARAMOUNT

PICTURES CORPORATION and BLACK

ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION LLC

Plaintiffs

vs. NO. 07CV2203

YOUTUBE INC. YOUTUBE LLC

and GOOGLE INC.

10 Defendants.

11

THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION PREMIER

12 LEAGUE LIMITED BOURNE CO. et al.

on behalf of themselves and all

13 others similarly situated

14 Plaintiffs

vs. NO. 07CV3582

15

YOUTUBE INC. YOUTUBE LLC and

16 GOOGLE INC.

17 Defendants.

18 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF ERIC SCHMIDT

SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA

19 WEDNESDAY MAY 2009

20

JOB NO. 16802

21

22

23

24

25
5/6/2009 Schmidt Eric

SCHMIDT ERIC 110-0002

MR. MANCINI Objection to form.

THE WITNESS dont remember the exact

board conversation but explained the explained

my reasoning to them absolutely.

MR. BASKIN Okay.

And as best you can recall can you tell us

what reasoning you explained

Sure.

10 This is company with very little revenue

11 growing quickly with user adoption growing much

12 faster than Google Video which was the product that

13 Google had. And they had indicated to us that they

14 would be sold and we believed that there would be

15 competing offer that because of who Google was pay

16 much more than they were worth.

17 In the deal dynamics the price remember is

18 not set by my judgment or by financial model or

19 discounted cash flow. Its set by what people are

20 willing to pay.

21 And we ultimately concluded that 1.65 billion

22 included premium for moving quickly and making sure

23 that we could participate in the user success of

24 YouTube.

25 And that was the analysis that you

53
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

MANUEL EVERETT ALVAREZ,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-00001-RH -GRJ

ROBERT DAFFIN, et al

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Extension of Time to file a

response to the Complaint. (Doc. 52.) Defendants request an additional thirty (30)

days to file a response to the Complaint so that counsel may complete the investigation

of Plaintiff’s claims necessary to frame an appropriate response. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Defendants’ Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. 52) is GRANTED. Defendants

shall file a response to the Complaint on or before January 28, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28 day of December, 2010. th

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
CERTIFICATION

I, Samir N. Masri, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lincoln International
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

                                    /s/ SAMIR N. MASRI
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Samir N. Masri

                                    Title: Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
                                    Date:  July 22, 2005
THIRD AMENDMENT TO SERVICES AGREEMENT

    

    

    This Third Amendment to the Services Agreement, dated December 8, 2019, to the Services Agreement, dated December 14, 2017 between  Ariel Scientific Innovations Ltd., a company organized under the
      laws of Israel ("Ariel"), and Qrons Inc., a Wyoming corporation (the “Company”). as amended by First Amendment to Services Agreement, dated April 12, 2018 and a Second Amendment to Services Agreement dated Dec. 14, 2018 (collectively, the “Services
      Agreement”)

    WHEREAS, the Company and Ariel are parties to the Services Agreement; and

    

    

    WHEREAS, the Company and Ariel desire to amend the Services Agreement to extend the term thereof for an additional twelve months as provided herein.

    

    

    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

    

    

    

    

    1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined herein shall have the
      meanings ascribed to such terms in the Services Agreement.

    

    

    2.         Amendment.
      The Services Agreement shall be hereby amended as follows:

    

    

           The Service Period as defined in Section 1.2 of the Services Agreement is hereby extended for an
    additional twelve-month period and shall terminate on December 14, 2020.
    

    

    3. Fees. In consideration for the performance of the Services, the Company shall pay Ariel $17,250
      within 30 days of the date hereof and an additional $17,250 on or before May 1, 2020.

    

    

    3. Ratification. Except as specifically amended hereby, all of the terms and conditions of the
      Services Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and approved.

    

    

    4. Counterparts. This Third Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts each of whch when
      executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.

    

    

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Third Amendment has been executed by the parties hereto as of December 8, 2019.

    

    

    	
            Ariel Scientific Innovations Ltd.

            By: /s/Larry Loev

            

            Name: Larry Loev

            

            Title: Chief Executive Officer

            

          	
            Qrons Inc.

            By: /s/ Jonah Meer

            

            Jonah Meer

            Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

F.D. MITCHELL, J.A. FISCHER, S.A. DOMINGUEZ

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

TRAVIS M. SOOTOO

PRIVATE (E-1), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201400109

GENERAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 16 December 2013.

Military Judge: CAPT J.J. Sullivan, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commanding General, 1st Marine 

Logistics Group, Camp Pendleton, CA.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LtCol E.J. Peterson, 

USMC.

For Appellant: CAPT Bree A. Ermentrout, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian K. Keller, Esq.

20 May 2014

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
#### STATE v. WILLIAM LARRY DANIEL, and JERRY MITCHUM GULLEDGE.

(Filed 22 November, 1961.)

1. Automobiles § 84—

A warrant charging that defendant did, on a specified date, unlawfully and willfully engage in a speed competition on a public highway with another motor vehicle is sufficient to inform defendant of the offense with which he is charged and is adequate to protect him against further prosecution for the same offense.

*7182. Indictment and Warrant § 9—

A warrant which is sufficient .to inform a person of the offense with which he is charged and which is adequate to protect him against further prosecution for that offense is sufficient. G.S. 15-153.

S. Automobiles § 84—

Evidence tending to show a prearrangement between defendants to race on the highway and that in engaging in such speed competition they operated their respective vehicles at an unlawful rate of speed is sufficient to support a verdict of guilty of violating G.S. 20-141 (b).

Appeals by defendants from *Hooks, S.J.,*April 1961 Term of Cabae-RUS.

Defendants were tried and convicted in the Recorder’s Court of Cabarrus County on warrants which charged the named defendant, on or about 18 March 1961, “unlawfully, wilfully and feloniously did operate a motor vehicle upon the public highways of North Carolina and did willfully engage in speed competition with another motor vehicle in Vio. G.S. 20-141.3 against the form of the Statute in such cases made and provided . . .” They appealed to the Superior Court. There the cases were consolidated for trial. The jury found defendants guilty. After the verdict defendants moved in arrest of judgment, contending the warrants failed to charge a criminal offense, merely charging two unrelated noncriminal acts. The motion was overruled. Judgment was entered on the verdict. Defendants appealed.

*Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Rountree for the State.*

*B. W. Blackwelder for defendant appellants.*

Pee Cueiam.

The record does not disclose any challenge to the warrant in the Recorder’s Court nor in the Superior Court until after the verdict. G.S. 20-141.3 (b) makes it “unlawful for any person to operate a motor vehicle on a street or highway wilfully in speed competition with another motor vehicle.” We think there can be no doubt that defendants understood the warrants to charge a violation of this statute. A warrant sufficient to inform a person of the offense with which he is charged and adequate to protect him against further prosecution for that offense is sufficient. G.S. 15-153; *S. v. Hammonds,*241 N.C. 226, 85 S.E. 2d 133.

Defendants’ motion for nonsuit was properly overruled. The evidence was adequate to support the verdict because sufficient to show a prearrangement between defendants to race on the highway, reaching a speed of 55 m.p.h. in a 35 m.p.h. speed zone. The case was submitted to the jury on a charge to which no exception was taken.

No error.