alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-03355-LTS Document 9 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 1 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03355-LTS Document 9 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 2 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03355-LTS Document 9 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 3 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03355-LTS Document 9 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 4 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03355-LTS Document 9 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 5 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03355-LTS Document 9 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 6 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03355-LTS Document 9 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 7 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03355-LTS Document 9 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 8 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03355-LTS Document 9 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 9 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03355-LTS Document 9 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 10 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03355-LTS Document 9 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 11 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03355-LTS Document 9 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 12 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03355-LTS Document 9 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 13 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03355-LTS Document 9 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 14 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03355-LTS Document 9 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 15 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03539-KMK Document 2 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03539-KMK Document 2 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### GUTHRIE v. STATE PORTS AUTHORITY

No. 97PA82.

Case below: 56 N.C. App. 68.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 4 May 1982.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 218 (Monday, November 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 69169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22585]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: [70 FR 67765, 
November 8, 2005].

Status: Closed Meeting.

Place:  100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC.

Date and Time of Previously Announced Meeting:  Thursday, November 10, 
2005 at 10 a.m.

Change in the Meeting:  Time change/deletion of items.
    The Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, November 10, 2005 at 10 
a.m. has been changed to Thursday, November 10, 2005 at 9:30 a.m.
    The following items will not be considered during the Thursday, 
November 10, 2005 Closed Meeting:
    Opinion; and
    Regulatory matter bearing enforcement implications.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: November 9, 2005.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-22585 Filed 11-9-05; 11:13 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                            Exhibit 32.1
                                                            ------------





                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Marc S. Hermelin, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results
          of operations of the Company.







Date:  March 25, 2008                    /s/ Marc S. Hermelin
       --------------             ------------------------------------
                                           Marc S. Hermelin
                                  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                      (Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 192 (Thursday, October 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 56778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4926]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, Pregnancy and HIV Prevention.
    Date: October 29-30, 2007.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Renaissance Mayflower Hotel, 1127 Connecticut Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20036.
    Contact Person: Carla T. Walls, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6898, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0374626f6f7060436e626a6f2d6d6a6b2d646c75"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9deafcf1f1eefeddf0fcf4f1b3f3f4f5b3faf2eb">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mother and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 27, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-4926 Filed 10-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE v. HICKS

No. 64 PC.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 554.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 24 September 1974.
#### IN RE WOMACK

No. 342 PC.

Case below: 53 N.C. App. 221.

Petition by caveator for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 November 1981.
#### CHARLIE ALBERT LAIL, minor, by his next friend, RUSSELL LAIL v. ULYSSES CHAPMAN, minor over 14 and W. A. ROBINSON. and BYNUM LAIL v. ULYSSES CHAPMAN and W. A. ROBINSON.

(Filed 17 October 1962.)

Automobiles § 41c—

Where the evidence discloses that defendant was driving a car in which plaintiff was riding as a passenger, that defendant was forced off the road by a car approaching from the opposite direction, half way over the center line of the highway to that driver’s left, that defendant lost control of his vehicle and ran off the road, resulting in the injury in suit, the fact that defendant, in the sudden emergency created by the negligence of the other driver, glanced back and inquired as to the *798identity of the other driver, *is held*insufficient to establish actionable negligence.

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Froneberger, J.,*March, 1962 Term, BurKE Superior Court.

In these civil actions, consolidated for trial, Charlie Albert Lail, minor, b.n.f., seeks to recover for his personal injuries, and Bynum Lail, father, seeks to recover medical expenses and loss of services allegedly caused by the negligent operation of a 1951 Ford automobile, owned by the defendant W. A. Robinson, and driven by the defendant Ulysses Chapman. Charlie A. Lail was a guest passenger at the time of the wreck which occurred about one o’clock on the afternoon of October 3,1959. The weather was clear. The concrete highway, 18 feet wide, was dry. As the defendant Chapman was driving at about 45-50 miles per hour, rounding a “blind curve,” slightly upgrade, he met an automobile “on the wrong side . . . about half way across the center line of the highway . . . Chapman cut to his right. . . got off the shoulder, lost control . . . careened back to the left . . . hit the bank and then turned over ... If he hadn’t cut to the right he would have hit that car . . . She (the driver) was across the white line in our lane of traffic . . . the car went by and he (Chapman) looked around and said, ‘Who was that?’ ”

At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, of which the above is the substance, the court entered judgments of nonsuit, from which the plaintiffs appealed.

*C. David Swift, for 'plaintiffs, appellants.*

*Patton & Ervin, by Sam J. Ervin, III, for defendants, appellees.*

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs’ evidence makes out a clear case of sudden emergency. That Chapman was curious as to the identity of the woman driver who forced him off the road, gave voice to that curiosity, and a fleeting glance in the direction of her departure, are not enough to establish actionable negligence. The judgments of non-suit are

Affirmed.
#### IN RE FORECLOSURE OF DEED OF TRUST

No. 242 PC.

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 563.

Petition by respondents for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 September 1979.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 8, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00297

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF F.A.S.,

From the 289th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Co urt No. 2012

- JUV

- 01811 The Honorable Carmen Kelsey, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed in this appeal on July 2, 2014. On July 9, 2014, this court notified appellant that the brief was late. On July 21, 2014, this court granted appellant’s motion requesting an extension of time to file his brief, extending the deadline to

S eptember 2, 2014. This court’s order stated no further extensions of time would be granted absent extenuating circumstances. The brief has not been filed. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant’s brief be filed in this court no later September 18, 2014. If appellant’s brief is not filed by September 18, 2014, this appeal will be abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing, and the trial court will be requested to consider whether sanctions should be imposed against appellant’s appointed attorne y.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 8th day of September, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of C ourt
#### MORGAN v. McLEOD

No. 134 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 467.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 28 June 1979.
Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-5 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-5 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DAVRON D. DADAMURATOV, 

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:10cv18-SPM/MD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the magistrate

judge’s Order and Amended Report and Recommendation dated February 8,

2010. Doc. 8. Petitioner has been furnished a copy and has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the report and recommendation, I have determined

that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 8) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The § 2241 petition (doc. 1) is recharacterized as a motion to
Page 2 of 2

vacate, set aside, or correct a sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

3. The Clerk shall file in Petitioner’s criminal case (Case Number

5:08cr18/RS) a copy of the following: the construed § 2255 motion (petitioner’s

habeas petition, doc. 1), the Order and Amended Report and Recommendation

(doc. 8), and this order.

4. All further proceedings shall be filed and maintained in the criminal

case file (Case Number 5:08cr18/RS) and the Clerk shall administratively close

this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of March, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO. 5:10cv18-SPM/MD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN T)ISTRIC:T OF NEW YORK 

Dominic Difiisco and Susan Dif'risco, 

ORDER OF REFERENCE 

TO A MAGTSTRATE JLJDGE 

Marriott lntcrnationnl. Inc., 

The above enli tled action is rcferred to the Honorable Debra C. Freeman, Uni tcd States 

Magistrate Judge for the following purpose(s): 

-- Genzral Pretrial (includes schcdu li ng, -- Consent under 28 U.S.C. 

discovery. ~lon-dispositive pretrial motions, $63ti( c) for all purposes 

and settlcn~elll (including lrial) 

J Specific Non-Dispositivr MotiodDispure: * .- -- - Consent under 28 U.S.C. 

$h?rj(c) for limited purpose 

(e.g., dispositive motion, 

- preliniinary injunction 

If re terra1 is for discovery displ~tes when ,- Habeas ('orpus 

thc District Judge is unavailable, the time 

periotl u EHc rci'en'al: Social Security 

/ 

Settlement* -- Llisposilive Motion (i .e.. motion 

requiring a Report and 

PA- l~qi~est Afier L)efault/~arnages Hearing Recnmrnendation 

Particular hlo1ion:- 

.A I1 such molions :- 

* Do not check if already assigned for gcneral pretrial. 

Dated: 7 /13 /m'~ 

New. Y ork, New York 

n. Collcen McMahon 

United States District .I udge 

USDS SDNY 

DOCUMENT 

ELECTRONICALLY FLED 

DOC #: 

DATEFILED: /+,I' <,- 

/ 

* 

Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-19 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-19 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-19 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-19 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-19 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-19 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-19 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-19 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 8 of 8
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 32.1


                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                       THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of K-V Pharmaceutical Company, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that, to the best of their
knowledge:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: February 9, 2005            /s/ Marc S. Hermelin
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                  Marc S. Hermelin
                                  Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Date: February 9, 2005            /s/ Gerald R. Mitchell
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                  Gerald R. Mitchell
                                  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to K-V Pharmaceutical Company and will be retained by K-V
Pharmaceutical Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE v. BLAYLOCK

No. 101 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 134.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 February 1972.
#### OSBORNE v. WALKER

No. 36 PC

Case below: 48 N.C. App. 627

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 November 1980.
#### FURR v. PINOCA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT.

No. 40 PC.

Case below: 53 N.C. App. 458.

Petition by plaintiffs and defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 December 1981.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40606

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff-Respondent

,

v.

BRADEN THOMAS BARNES

,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 688

Filed: October 2, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Timothy L. Hans en , District Judge.

Order denying Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of

sentence, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben Patrick McGreevy, Deputy Appellate Public Defende r, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Braden Thomas Barnes pled guilty to robbery, Idaho Code § 18

- 6501

. The district court

sentenced Barnes to a unified term of fifteen years , with three years determinate

. 1 After Barnes

completed a period of retained jurisdiction, the district court relinquished jurisdiction and

execut ed a reduced sentence of a unified term of fifteen years, with one and one

- half years

1 Barnes also pled guilty to misdemeano r driving under the influence, and the district court imposed a sentence of sixty days in jail to run concurrently with Barnes’ sentence for robbery

. Barnes’ conviction and sentence for misdemeano r driving under the influence are not at issue in this appeal.2 determinate. Barnes filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of his sentence, which

the district court denied. Barnes appeals.

A motion for reduction of sen tence under Idaho Criminal Rule 35 is essentially a plea for

leniency, addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319,

144 P.3d 23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee , 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the

motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2 007). Upon review of the

record, including the new information submitted with Barnes’ Rule 35 motion, we conclude no

abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order denying Barnes’ Rule

35 motion is affirmed.
Case 1:07-cr-00368-RWS Document 9 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 5 Filed 04/05/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### SHELLHORN v. BRAD RAGAN, INC.

No. 113 PC.

Case below: 38 N.C. App. 310.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1978.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The First Years Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2002, as amended by Form
10-Q/A Amendment No. 1 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
November 15, 2002, Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 2 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 19, 2002 and as hereby further amended by
Amendment No. 3, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Amended Report"), I, Ronald J. Sidman, Chairman, President,
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     1.   The Amended Report fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


                               By: /s/ Ronald J. Sidman
                                  ---------------------------
                                  Ronald J. Sidman,
                                  Chairman, President, and
                                  Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The First Years Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2002, as amended by Form
10-Q/A Amendment No. 1 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
November 15, 2002, Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 2 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 19, 2002 and as hereby further amended by
Amendment No. 3, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Amended Report"), I, John R. Beals, Senior Vice President -
Finance and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

     1.   The Amended Report fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


                               By: /s/ John R. Beals
                                  ---------------------------
                                  John R. Beals,
                                  Senior Vice President - Finance and Treasurer,
                                  (Chief Financial Officer and
                                  Chief Accounting Officer)
#### STATE v. LITTLE

No. 78 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 54.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 November 1975.