alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**12.1** **Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Paolo Scaroni, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Enel S.p.A.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the companyand have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of thecompany’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting.
June 30, 2004         /s/PAOLO SCARONI
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-91737, 333-34552, 333-45486,333-49842, 333-52012, 333-65192 , 333-82864 and 333-113544) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Plan, 1999 Director Option Plan, Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, 2000 Supplemental Stock Option Plan and Written CompensationAgreements of Blue Coat Systems, Inc.; the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan of Spring Bank Networks, Inc.; and the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan and 2000 Equity Incentive Plan of Entera, Inc. of our report dated May 25, 2004, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of Blue Coat Systems, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended April 30, 2004. 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Walnut Creek, California 

July 14, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                          54,587
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   30,056
<ALLOWANCES>                    (9,150)
<INVENTORY>                     310,762
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                496,042
<PP&E>                          468,073
<DEPRECIATION>                  (136,894)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  3,636,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,469,286
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        12,780
<OTHER-SE>                      (418,690)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    3,636,472
<SALES>                         2,544,402
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,544,402
<CGS>                           1,784,640
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,784,640
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                5,853,947
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              401,462
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (5,488,329)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (5,488,329)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (5,488,329)
<EPS-BASIC>                     (0.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.59)



</TABLE>
#### DEARMAN v. BRUNS

No. 98 PC.

Case below: 11 N.C. App. 564.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 September 1971.
# Waiver of Limitation on Obligation and Expenditure of $1,051.6 Million in Fiscal Year 2007 Economic Support Funds for Iraq

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 1314(c)(2) of the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007 (Public Law 110-28 ) (the “Act”), I hereby waive the requirements of section 1314(c)(1) for $1,051.6 million of Fiscal Year 2007 Economic Support Funds for Iraq and direct you to submit to the Congress this determination along with the certification in accordance with section 1314(c)(2) of the Act. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this determination in the Federal Register. 

[FR Doc. 07-4954

Billing code 4710-10-P
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

SourceForge, Inc.Mountain View, California

We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-92409;
333-92391; 333-38768; 333-38766; 333-38874; 333-59096; 333-71944; 333-101965;
and 333-116778) of SourceForge, Inc. of our report dated October 31, 2005,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule, before the effects of the adjustments to retrospectively account for
the software business as a discontinued operation as described in Notes 1 and 11
(the 2005 financial statements before the effects of the adjustments described
in Notes 1 and 11 are not presented separately herein), which appears in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1.

|/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP       | 
|-------------------------- | 
|                           | 
|San Jose,
      California | 
|October 17,
      2007     | 

---
#### ROY OTIS RESPESS v. MARVIN BRICKHOUSE and GORDON HODGES DAVENPORT.

(Filed 23 September, 1964.)

Automobiles § 41f—

Evidence *held*sufficient to be submitted to the jury in this action to recover for injuries sustained when defendant driver drove his truck into the *486rear of plaintiff's automobile, notwithstanding that the lights of the stationary vehicle were burning and a person was attempting to flag the truck down with a flashlight.

Appeal by defendants from *Cowper, J.,*January Civil Session 1964 of PasquotaNK.

This is a civil action to recover damages to the Cadillac automobile of plaintiff and for personal injuries sustained by him when a ten-wheeler GMC 61 model truck, owned by defendant Brickhouse and driven by defendant Davenport, carrying 28 or 30 head of cattle, ran into the rear of plaintiff’s automobile on 23 October 1962 about 5:30 p.m.

The plaintiff was driving in a southerly direction on the Albemarle Sound bridge, which is 3.8 miles in length. The bridge is 22 feet wide and has a drawbridge 331 feet long, located approximately in the center thereof. Just before plaintiff reached the drawbridge he heard a swishing sound and realized as he was entering the drawbridge that he had a flat tire. He did not stop his car until he left the drawbridge and then stopped as near the right-hand side of the bridge as he could in order to leave sufficient room to remove the wheel from the rear right side of the car. The head and rear lights were on in regular driving position.

The bridge tender testified that when he saw the Respess car stopped he got his flashlight and went to see if he could help. The car had been stopped under the gate which would be lowered if the drawbridge had to be put into operation. At his request the car was moved south a few feet to clear the gate. This witness further testified that the red lights on the rear of plaintiff’s car were burning; that he saw and heard the Brickhouse truck approaching from the north while he was walking back in a northerly direction from the plaintiff’s car. When he was about 40 feet from plaintiff’s car he took his flashlight, “with the red just like that and waved it back and forwards across the road.” The' truck was between 300 to 400 feet from the witness when he began to try to stop it. “I continued to wave the truck down until I had to jump out of the way to keep from getting run over myself.”

From a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendants appeal, assigning error. '• ' -n;

*McLendon, Brim, Holderness & Brooks, by L. P. McLendon, Jr. and Edgar B. Fisher, Jr.; and Frank B. Aycock, Jr., for. plaintiff apr, pellee,*... ,

. *LeBoy,- Wells & Shaw for defendant appellants.■ " ■*• ....

*487Pek CuRiam.

The defendants’ only assignment of error is to the failure of the court below to sustain their motion for judgment as of nonsuit made at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence.

In our opinion, plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient to carry the case to the jury and we so hold.

Affirmed.
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 2 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 3 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 4 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 5 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 6 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 7 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 8 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 9 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 10 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 11 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 12 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 13 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 14 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 15 of 15
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            DISTINCTIVE DEVICES, INC.

                       CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                          OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                          -----------------------------

     The undersigned, Sanjay Mody, the President, Chief Executive Officer,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Distinctive Devices, Inc. (the
"Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

     1.   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 19th day of November, 2003.

                                          /s/ SANJAY MODY
                                          ---------------
                                          Sanjay Mody
                                          President,
                                          Chief Executive Officer,
                                          Treasurer and
                                          Chief Financial Officer
Law Offices of Scott A. Lucas 

60 East 42nd Street, Suite 1001 

New York, New York 10165 

(212) 573-6906 

Scott A. Lucas, Esq. (SL-6316) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Barbara Rockmore 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

---------------------------------------------------------------X 

BARBARA ROCKMORE, 07-CV-3592 (DAB) 

 Plaintiff, 

 DECLARATION OF 

 -against- SCOTT A. LUCAS 

DARRICK E. ANTELL, 

DARRICK E. ANTELL, M.D., D.D.S., P.C., 

DARRICK E. ANTELL, M.D., D.D.S., P.C., F.A.C.S., 

DARRICK E. ANTELL, M.D., F.A.C.S. and 

DARRICK E. ANTELL, M.D., F.A.C.S., P.C., 

 Defendants. 

---------------------------------------------------------------X 

 Scott A. Lucas, an attorney duly admitted to practice before this Court, 

hereby declares under penalty of perjury: 

 1. I am Plaintiff’s counsel in the above action. I submit this 

Declaration for the purpose of annexing a true copy of Plaintiff’s Amended 

Complaint filed as of right on May 25, 2007. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 May 25, 2007 

 /s/ 

Scott A. Lucas (SL-6316) 

Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 10 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT “1” 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 10 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER R EINSTATING A PPEAL

Appellate case name: Darrell Glen Nervis

- Peters v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 17

- 00831

- CR

Trial court case number: 1519293

Trial court: 263rd District Court of Harris County

This appeal was abated and remanded to the trial court to issue findings of fact and

conclusions of law regarding its certification that appellant waived his right to appeal. A

supplemental clerk’s record has been filed con taining the requested findings of fact and

conclusions of law. Accordingly, we lift the abatement ordered by this Court and reinstate the

appeal on the Court’s active docket.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

Acting individually

Date: October 9 , 2018
Exhibit 13.2  Section 906 Certificate  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Luxfer Holdings PLC, a public limited company incorporated under English law (the company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:  The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the Form 20-F) of the company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.   Date: March 15,   2016

/s/ Andrew Michael   BeadenAndrew Michael BeadenGroup Finance Director
NIOSH
ALERT

Scaffolds Near Overhead Power Lines

WARNING!

Workers may be electrocuted when erecting, moving, or working from metal or
conductive scaffolds near overhead power lines.

Take the following actions to protect yourself if you
are erecting, moving, or working from metal or
conductive scaffolds near overhead power lines.

© Be aware of overhead power lines in your work
area. Most overhead power lines are not
insulated.

© Conductinitial and daily surveys of the worksite
and implement control measures and training
to address hazards at the site.

e Recognize the hazards of moving, erecting, or
working from scaffolds near overhead power
lines.

e Restrict the use of electrically conductive tools
or materials where they may contact overhead
power lines.

¢ Be trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation
(CPR).

W

Metal scaffold contacting an overhead power line.

¢ Always maintain the following minimum
clearance between scaffolds and power lines:

— 2 feet for insulated power lines of less
than 300 volts

— 10 feet for insulated power lines of 300 volts
or more and for all uninsulated power lines

© If scaffolds must be moved in the area of
overhead power lines, appoint a competent
worker to observe the clearance between the
power lines and the scaffold and warn others
if the minimum distance is not maintained.

© If minimum clearance cannot be maintained
when scaffolds must be erected or moved near
overhead power lines, notify the utility company
to de-energize the power lines or provide ade-
quate insulation before any work is initiated.

For additional information, refer to the
NIOSH Alert on Scaffolds Near Overhead
Power Lines [DHHS (NIOSH) 91-110], or
call 1-800-35-NIOSH. Single copies are
available free from the following:

Publications Dissemination, DSDTT

National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health

4676 Columbia Parkway

Cincinnati, OH 45226

(513) 533-8287

==] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Public Health Service
Centers for Disease Control
National Institute for Occupational Safety
neeESt* and Health

Please tear out and post. Distribute copies to workers
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE  SHEET OF  eSportbike.com,Inc.  AS OF DECEMBER  31, 1999 AND THE RELATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0




</TABLE>
#### MRS. FRANK L. HALTIWANGER v. CHARLOTTE AMUSEMENT COMPANY T/A CAROLINA THEATRE.

(Filed 17 January 1964.)

Appeal -by plaintiff .from *MacRae, S. J.,*15 April 1963 Civil “B” Session of Mecklenburg.

C-ivil action 'by plaintiff, a paying patron of defendant’s theatre, to ■recover damages -f-or -personal injuries sustained by her when she fell in -descending -a ¡stairway from the second floor of the theatre where the rest room. was. She -alleges that -her fall and injuries' were proxinuately caused by defendant’s negligence in having the stairway inadequately lighted, in removing the carpet from the steps, and leaving ¡a raised wooden strip on the front edge of each step, and in maintaining a ¡fragile, -inadequate, and unstable railing along the -outer edge of the stains.

Each party offered evidence in support of the allegations in her or its pleading.

The trial court submitted to- .the jury the customary issues in such cases -oif negligence, contributory negligence, and damages. The jury answered the first issue, as to- whether plaintiff was injured by the -negligence of defendant as -alleged in the complaint, No.

*181From >a judgment that plaintiff recover nothing from defendant and taxing her with the costs, she appeals.

*Barnes & Olive by W. Faison Barnes for plaintiff appellant.*

*Helms, Mulliss, McMillan & Johnston by E. Osborne Ayscue, Jr.., for defendant appellee.*

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff’s sole assignment of error brought forward and set out in her -brief is the -failure of the court to- -comply with the provisions of G.S. 1-180. The'facts -are not -complicated. We have examined the charge in its entirety and sufficient prejudicial error has not (been made to appear therein to justify a new trial.

The verdict and judgment below will be upheld.

No error.