alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 71852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23471]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Rescission of Order of 
Revocation

    Notice is hereby given that the Order revoking the following 
license is being rescinded by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant 
to sections 14 and 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) 
and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of 
Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.
    License Number: 018410NF.
    Name: Onebin.Com, Inc.
    Address: 3406 SE 26 Terrace, Unit C-10, Lauderdale, FL 33312.
    Order Published: FR: 09/28/05 (Volume 70, No. 187, Pg. 56691).

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 05-23471 Filed 11-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 45 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 45 Filed 10/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### UTILITIES COMM. v. INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 31 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 477.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 April 1979.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Global Precision Medical Inc. (the Company) on Form 10K-SB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lindsay Semple, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|By: | /s/ Lindsay Semple                                                                   
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | Lindsay Semple
Chief Executive Officer & Acting Chief Financial Officer
July 13, 2004
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-11 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-11 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-11 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-11 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-11 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-11 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-11 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-11 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-11 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-11 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-11 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 11 of 11
#### McGRADY v. QUALITY MOTORS

Nos. 118 PC and 63.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 256.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals improvidently granted 30 December 1974 (reported 286 N.C. 336) is denied 11 March 1975.
Reduzca el riesgo de explosión

por polvo en suspensión

Agregue un depurador húmedo alineado

¿Sabía usted?

Es posible lograr reducciones de más del 90% 

del polvo en suspensión al agregar un 

depurador húmedo alineado a un ventilador

de sección auxiliar*

Los operadores de minas de carbon pueden

usar esta combinación para reducir la 

posibilidad de una explosión por polvo de 

carbón en el retorno de aire

Foto de NIOSH

* Las conclusions se basan en estudios de campo de NIOSH.

Para obtener más información, visite

www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/works/coversheet1973.html
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO THE

PENNSYLVANIA INTEREST ON

LAWYERS TRUST ACCOUNT BOARD :

:

:

:

: No. 164

DISCIPLINARY RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11 th day of July , 2018, the Honorable Stephanie A. Domitrovich,

Erie County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Pennsylvania Interest on Lawyers

Trust Account Board for a term of three years, commencing September 1, 2018.
Opinion issued April 14, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01
- 15
- 00131
- CR

——————————— IME OKON EKWERE , Appella nt V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 232nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1446601

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Ime Okon Ekwere, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of theft. 1 The trial court found appellant guilty and, i n accordance with the terms of

1 See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 31.03(a ) , (e)(5) (West Supp. 201 4 ).2 a ppellant’s plea bargain agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to ten years’ confinement. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal. In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial
court’ s permission to appeal. T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN . art. 44.02 (West 2006); T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certificat ion showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been m ade part of the record. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2 (d). Here, the trial court’ s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id

. T he trial court ’s certification states t hat this is a plea bargain case and that the defendant has no right of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports the trial court’ s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal , we must dismiss this appeal

. See Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea

- bargained is permitt ed to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardl ess of the basis for the appeal.”)

. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.3 PER CURIAM Panel con sists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b).
#### New York Institution for the Instruction of the Deaf and Dumb, Appellant, *v.*The City of New York, Respondent.

*N. Y. Inst, for Deaf & Dumb*v. *City of New Yorh,*181 App. Div. 184, affirmed.

(Argued September 30, 1918;

decided October 15, 1918.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 18, 1918, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate and set aside the return by the defendant of a notice of exceptions and notice of filing the same, previously *610served upon said defendant. The following questions were certified: “ 1. In an action in the Supreme Court, brought under section 1638 of the Code of Civil Procedure to quiet title to real property, where an issue of fact is joined and defendant in its answer claims an estate in said property, and at the close of a trial had before a jury at defendant’s request, under the provisions of section 1642 of said Code, the evidence of both parties having been put in in full, should the trial court, who submitted two of the many material "questions of fact to the jury at defendant’s request, and thereafter, on defendant’s motion, set aside the jury’s findings in plaintiff's favor on the questions submitted and dismissed the complaint, the defendant asking no determination as to its estate in the property as set forth in its answer, have passed upon proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, which plaintiff deemed warranted by the evidence and duly submitted by the plaintiff before the complaint was dismissed? 2. Was it the duty of the trial court to have made findings of fact and conclusions of law as a basis for its decision in the above-entitled action? 3. Did plaintiff have the legal right to have the proposed findings of fact and. conclusions of law appearing in the record and submitted by it to the trial court passed upon by said court? 4. Should defendant be compelled to receive and retain the notice of exceptions duly filed and served by the plaintiff appearing in the record? ”

*Thomas F. Conway*and *Thomas E. O’Brien*for appellant.

*William P. Burr, Corporation Counsel (Charles J. Nehrbas, Terence Farley*and *John R. Salmon*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, and each one of the questions certified answered in the negative; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 8 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 8 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 8 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 3 of 3
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10173 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus AURLIANO CARDENAS, also known as Aureliano Cardenas, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:97-CR-112-9-A

- - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Aurliano Cardenas, also known as Aureliano Cardenas, appeals from his sentence following conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine. Cardenas argues that the district court erred in applying a two-level upward adjustment to his offense level, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c). A determination that a defendant is an organizer under § 3B1.1 is a finding of fact, which is reviewed for clear error. See United States v. Giraldo , 111 F.3d 21, 23 (5th Cir. 1997). Factual findings are notNo. 98-10173 -2- clearly erroneous if plausible in light of the record as a whole. See id. Examination of the evidence contained in the record indicates that the district court did not clearly err in applying the two-level organizer adjustment to Cardenas, pursuant to § 3B1.1(c). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 1 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 2 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 3 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 4 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 5 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 6 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 7 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 8 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 9 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 10 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 11 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 12 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 13 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 14 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 15 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 16 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 17 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 18 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 19 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 20 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 21 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 22 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 23 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 24 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-7 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 25 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03492-RJS Document 10 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
JOHNEKA JOHNSON

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 5441

Opinion filed February 9, 2016.

Petition for Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

-- Original

Jurisdiction

.

Johneka Johnson, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(5).

WOLF, ROWE, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Hildred K. Tallman et al., Respondents. *v.*Charles Wyand et al., Appellants.

Reported below, 179 App. Div. 958.

(Argued May 27, 1918;

decided June 4, 1918.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 10, 1917, modifying and *unanimously*affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at an Equity Term in an action to restrain defendants from violating certain building restrictions.

The motion was made upon the ground that the affirmance by the Appellate Division was unanimous; that the modification was in favor of the appellants and that permission to appeal had not been obtained.

*George J. Skivington*for motion.

*Frederick Wiedman*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
#### REALTY, INC. v. WHISNANT

No. 269 PC.

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 702

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 September 1979.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the (a)Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-91639) pertaining to the Expedia, Inc. 1999 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, (b) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-91623) pertaining to the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (c) RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-91631), pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, (d) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-51146) pertaining to the resale of 9,183,884 common shares, (e) Registration Statement (Form S-8No. 333-65138) pertaining to the Expedia, Inc. 401(k) Plan, (f) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-73168) pertaining to the issuance of 3,200,000 warrants and 6,700,000 common shares, (g) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-81240)pertaining to registration of 4,200,000 warrants and 4,200,000 common shares, (h) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-81646) pertaining to resale of 955,000 common shares, (i) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-101910) pertaining to theExpedia, Inc. 2001 Stock Plan and the Expedia, Inc. 1999 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, of our report dated February 5, 2003 (except for the second paragraph of Note 15, as to which the date is March 19, 2003 and except for Note 16, asto which the date is April 25, 2003), with respect to the consolidated financial statements (as restated) and schedule of Expedia, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

/s/    Ernst & YoungLLP 

 

Seattle, Washington

April 25, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (the Company) for the
period ending July 31, 2007, I, William A. Shumaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:



| | (1) | such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended July 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended July 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 10, 2007



/s/ William A. ShumakerWilliam A. ShumakerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Case 1:07-cv-03524-GEL Document 3 Filed 05/15/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03524-GEL Document 3 Filed 05/15/2007 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER GALLO,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2365 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 121 DB 2017

Attorney Registration No. 206972

(Fayette County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2 nd day of November , 2018, upon consideration of the Report

and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board, Michael Christopher Gallo is disbarred

fro m the bar of th is Commonwealth, and he shall comply with the provisions of

Pa.R.D.E. 217. Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to

Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2025 

To amend the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 1999 to modify 

the definition of agricultural commodities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 27, 2019 

Mr. PERDUE (for himself, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. CASSIDY, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, 

Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. RUBIO, and Mr. INHOFE) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 

1999 to modify the definition of agricultural commodities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Agricultural Trucking 

5 Relief Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES. 

7 Section 229(e) of the Motor Carrier Safety Improve8 ment Act of 1999 (49 U.S.C. 31136 note; Public Law 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2025 IS

1 106–159) is amended by striking paragraph (7) and in2 serting the following: 

3 ‘‘(7) AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY.—The term 

4 ‘agricultural commodity’ includes— 

5 ‘‘(A) agricultural, aquacultural, horti6 cultural, and floricultural commodities; 

7 ‘‘(B) fruits; 

8 ‘‘(C) vegetables; 

9 ‘‘(D) any non-human living animal and the 

10 products of that animal; and 

11 ‘‘(E) other agriculture products that are— 

12 ‘‘(i) sensitive to temperature or cli13 mate; and 

14 ‘‘(ii) at risk of perishing in transit.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# CE2012247EN.01001101.xml

| 17.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 247/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 247/11

---

Thursday 24 March 2011Appointment of the executive director of the European Banking Authority (EBA)

P7_TA(2011)0111

European Parliament resolution of 24 March 2011 on the appointment of the Executive Director of the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority)

2012/C 247 E/02

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the letter of 10 March 2011 from the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the letter of 10 March 2011 from the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority),

| — | having regard to Article 51(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority) (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 51(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority) (1),

1

| — | having regard to the fact that, at its meeting of 17 March 2011, the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs heard the candidate selected by the Board of Supervisors of the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the fact that, at its meeting of 17 March 2011, the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs heard the candidate selected by the Board of Supervisors of the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority),

| — | having regard to Rule 120 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 120 of its Rules of Procedure,

| A. | whereas Adam Farkas fulfils the criteria set out in Article 51(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010), |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas Adam Farkas fulfils the criteria set out in Article 51(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010),

| 1. | Approves the appointment of Adam Farkas as Executive Director of the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the appointment of Adam Farkas as Executive Director of the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority);

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority).

---

(1)  OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 12.

1

---
Case 1:07-cv-03384-JCF Document 19 Filed 01/10/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03384-JCF Document 19 Filed 01/10/2008 Page 2 of 2
September 12, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JOHN EARL HALL, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00373-CV V.

ELSIE MARTIN-SIMON, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on April 15, 2013. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, John Earl Hall.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.