alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2005-21256; Airspace Docket No. 05-AGL-04]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date. 

# SUMMARY:

This document confirms the effective date of the direct final rule which establishes Class D airspace at Eau Claire, WI.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

0901 UTC, October 27, 2005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Steve Davis, FAA Terminal Operations, Central Service Office, Airspace and Procedures Branch, AGL-530, Federal Aviation Administration, 2300 East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois 60018, telephone (847) 294-7131, or David Sapadin (847) 294-7477.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 6, 2005 (70 FR 52903). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on that date.                

Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois, on November 1, 2005.

Nancy B. Kort,

Area Director, Central Terminal Operations.

[FR Doc. 05-23633 Filed 12-2-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Case 1:07-cv-03479-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03479-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03479-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03479-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03479-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03479-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03479-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03479-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03479-AKH Document 10 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 9 of 9
Case 7:07-cv-03544-KMK-LMS     Document 11      Filed 01/17/2008     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cr-00379-LTS     Document 5      Filed 07/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1631 

To establish criminal penalties for aliens who fail to depart before the 

expiration of their visas. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23 (legislative day, MAY 22), 2019 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To establish criminal penalties for aliens who fail to depart 

before the expiration of their visas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR ALIENS WHO FAIL 

4 TO DEPART FROM THE UNITED STATES BE5 FORE THE EXPIRATION OF THEIR VISAS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 274D of the Immigration 

7 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324d) is amended to read 

8 as follows: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1631 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 274D. PENALTIES FOR FAILURE TO DEPART. 

2 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITED CONDUCT.—It is unlawful for any 

3 alien who is subject to a final order of removal— 

4 ‘‘(1) to willfully fail or refuse— 

5 ‘‘(A) to depart from the United States pur6 suant to such order; 

7 ‘‘(B) to make a timely application in good 

8 faith for travel or other documents necessary 

9 for departure; or 

10 ‘‘(C) to present for removal at the time 

11 and place required by the Secretary of Home12 land Security; or 

13 ‘‘(2) to conspire to or take any action designed 

14 to prevent or hamper the alien’s departure pursuant 

15 to such order. 

16 ‘‘(b) CIVIL PENALTIES.—Any person who violates 

17 subsection (a) shall pay a civil penalty of not more than 

18 $500 to the Secretary of Homeland Security for each day 

19 the alien remains in violation of such subsection. 

20 ‘‘(c) CRIMINAL PENALTIES.—Any alien who is re21 quired to depart from the United States as a result of 

22 the expiration of the alien’s visa and fails to depart the 

23 United States within the prescribed period shall be fined 

24 under title 18, United States Code, imprisoned for not 

25 more than 1 year, or both. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 1631 IS

1 ‘‘(d) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall 

2 be construed to diminish or qualify any penalties to which 

3 an alien may be subject for activities proscribed under sec4 tion 243(a) or any other section of this Act.’’. 

5 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

6 for the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 

7 note) is amended by striking the item relating to section 

8 274D and inserting the following: 

‘‘Sec. 274D. Penalties for failure to depart.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
DLD

- 262 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 17

- 1966

___________ IN RE: LARRY CHARLES , Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the U nited States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Related to E.D. Pa Civ. Nos. 2

- 13

- cv - 07548 & 2

- 14

- cv - 00189 )

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

May 25, 2017 Before: CHAGARES, VANASKIE, and KRAUSE , Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: J u ne 14, 2017 )

_________ OPINION *

_________ PER CURIAM In this mandamus petition, Larry Charles “seeks an Order to compel the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to issue a Certificate of App ealability” in connection with a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petitio n he filed in 2013. Because

ma n damus may “not be used as a substitute for the regular appeals process ,” Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court , 542 U.S. 367, 380

– 81, (2004) , we will deny Charles’ petition.

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constit ute binding precedent.2

C harles filed a § 2254 petition in 2013 , seeking to attack a 25

– 50 year sentence imposed after he pleaded no contest to various sex crimes in Philadelphia County. The District Court denied his petition and his request for a certificate of appealability. W e denied his request for a certificate of appealability

— concluding that “jurists of reason would not debate the District Court’s assessme nt of his constitutional claims ”

— and also denied his request for rehearing. C.A. No. 15

- 3064. The Supreme Court deni ed his petition for a writ of certiorari, and also his petition for rehearing. Charles v. Harry , 137 S. Ct. 671 , reh’g denied , 137 S. Ct. 1369 (2017)

. Charles has exhausted all avenues to appeal the District Court’s denial of his request for a certificate of appealability

— and has lost. He may not now use mandamus

as yet another attempt at an appeal

. Cheney , 542 U.S. at 380

– 81. We will deny his petition. 1

1 In the alternative, Charles asks us to recall our mandate denying his request for a certificate of appealability

— a request that is “regarded as a second or successive application for purposes of [28 U.S.C.] § 2244(b).” Calderon v. Thompson , 523 U.S. 538, 553 (1998). Because Charles cannot meet § 2244(b)’s gatekeeping requirements

— he does not claim to have newly discovered evidence of his actual innocence, or rely on a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on co llateral review

— we will not recall our mandate. See United States v. Winkelman , 746 F.3d 134, 135 (3d Cir. 2014).
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-2 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-2 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-2 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 72 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 72 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 72 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 72 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 72 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 72 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 72 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 72 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 8 of 8
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                            500  
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                  16,456     
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                     3,580
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               22,242      
<PP&E>                                         29,988     
<DEPRECIATION>                                 18,245
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 35,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,750
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        6,550    
<OTHER-SE>                                     14,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   35,026
<SALES>                                        57,281  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               57,281
<CGS>                                          44,733         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  53,841 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   33
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 63
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,344
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,338
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,006
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,006
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.81   
        


</TABLE>
# CE2013168EN.01013201.xml

| 14.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 168/132 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 168/132

---

Wednesday 14 December 2011Numerical strength of delegations

P7_TA(2011)0571

European Parliament decision of 14 December 2011 on the numerical strength of the interparliamentary delegations, delegations to joint parliamentary committees and delegations to parliamentary cooperation committees and multilateral Parliamentary Assemblies (2011/2839(RSO))

2013/C 168 E/20

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the proposal by the Conference of Presidents, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the proposal by the Conference of Presidents,

| — | having regard to its Decision of 14 September 2009 on the numerical strength of the interparliamentary delegations, delegations to joint parliamentary committees and delegations to parliamentary cooperation committees and multilateral Parliamentary Assemblies (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to its Decision of 14 September 2009 on the numerical strength of the interparliamentary delegations, delegations to joint parliamentary committees and delegations to parliamentary cooperation committees and multilateral Parliamentary Assemblies (1),

1

| — | having regard to Rule 198 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 198 of its Rules of Procedure,

| A. | whereas there is a need for continuity in its business, |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas there is a need for continuity in its business,

| B. | whereas, following the entry into force of the protocol amending Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, new Members are entitled to sit in the European Parliament and on its bodies in full enjoyment of their rights, |
| --- | --- |

B.

whereas, following the entry into force of the protocol amending Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, new Members are entitled to sit in the European Parliament and on its bodies in full enjoyment of their rights,

| 1. | Decides to amend the number of Members in the interparliamentary delegations as follows: | Delegation for relations with the Arab Peninsula: 18 members |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

Decides to amend the number of Members in the interparliamentary delegations as follows:

Delegation for relations with the Arab Peninsula: 18 members

| | Delegation for relations with India: 28 members |
| --- | --- |

Delegation for relations with India: 28 members

| | Delegation for relations with the Korean Peninsula: 17 members |
| --- | --- |

Delegation for relations with the Korean Peninsula: 17 members

| | Delegation for relations with South Africa: 17 members |
| --- | --- |

Delegation for relations with South Africa: 17 members

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information.

---

(1)  OJ C 224 E, 19.8.2010, p. 36.

1

---
#### LORDEON v. PETERS

No. 110 PC.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 191.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 12 January 1982. Motion of Commissioner to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 12 January 1982.
#### STATE v. BROWN

No. 50 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 234.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 April 1977.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2011 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2011

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to reduce the credit hour 
requirement for the Edith Nourse Rogers STEM Scholarship program of the 
        Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 2019

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Manchin, Ms. Sinema, and Mr. 
Cruz) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
                 to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to reduce the credit hour 
requirement for the Edith Nourse Rogers STEM Scholarship program of the 
        Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veteran STEM Scholarship Improvement 
Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN CREDIT HOUR REQUIREMENT FOR EDITH NOURSE ROGERS 
              STEM SCHOLARSHIP.

    Section 3320(b)(4)(A)(i) of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ``more than the standard 128 semester (or 192 
quarter) credit hours'' and inserting ``at least the standard 120 
semester (or 180 quarter) credit hours''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:07-cv-03451-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 1 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03451-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 2 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03451-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 3 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03451-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 4 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03451-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 5 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03451-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 6 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03451-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 7 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03451-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 8 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03451-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 9 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03451-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 10 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03451-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 11 of 11
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 2004N-0535]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “MedWatch: Food and Drug Administration Medical Products Reporting Program” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Nelson, Office of Management Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1482.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of December 27, 2004 (69 FR 77256), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0291.                

As requested by the agency, in addition to the approval of the revised forms, the existing forms are approved for continued use for the next 12 months to allow for the industry to make necessary changes to their computerized systems.

                    The approval expires on October 31, 2008. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets*.                

      ( print page 72844)    
Dated: November 30, 2005.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-23676 Filed 12-6-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Blancheri, W.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-37 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-37 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-37 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-37 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-37 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-37 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-37 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 7 of 7