alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 32.1


                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                       THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of KV Pharmaceutical Company, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that, to the best of their
knowledge:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2003        /s/ Marc S. Hermelin
                             ---------------------------------------------
                             Marc S. Hermelin
                             Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 14, 2003        /s/ Gerald R. Mitchell
                             ---------------------------------------------
                             Gerald R. Mitchell
                             Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
                             Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to KV Pharmaceutical Company and will be retained by KV
Pharmaceutical Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Broadcasting Board of Governors

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Persons interested in obtaining more information should contact Carol Booker at (202) 203-4545.

Dated: October 9, 2007.

Carol Booker, 

Legal Counsel.

[FR Doc. 07-5118  Filed 10-12-07; 12:01 pm]

BILLING CODE 8610-01-M
#### Chris-Mac Co., Appellant, v Harvey Johnpoll et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

January 15,1987

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Finkelstein, Borah, Schwartz, Altschuler & Goldstein, P. C. (Steven L. Schultz*of counsel), for appellant. *Stolar, Alterman & Boop, P. C. (Marcia Levy*of counsel), for Harvey Johnpoll, respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order entered August 16, 1985 reversed, with $10 costs, and tenant’s motion to dismiss the petition is denied.

The tenant herein is presently incarcerated, and the landlord seeks to evict him on the ground that there has been a subletting and/or assignment to another without consent. *598Civil Court granted tenant’s preanswer dismissal motion, concluding that the person currently in possession of the apartment premises, one Martin McDonough, is a permitted additional occupant under Real Property Law § 235-f (the roommate law). We disagree. It is undisputed on this record that tenant has not resided in the apartment since at least September 1983, nor is it shown that tenant will be in a position to resume occupancy of the premises in the foreseeable future. Thus, even accepting tenant’s assertion that he and McDonough lived together in the apartment at one time, their present arrangement, however interpreted, is not one covered by Real Property Law § 235-f, which "was enacted to extend protection to unrelated persons *sharing*a dwelling [and] contemplates that the occupant reside in the apartment together with the tenant” *(305 E. 72nd St. Assocs. v Menocal,*NYLJ, Dec. 29, 1986, at 5, col 1 [App Term, 1st Dept]; emphasis in original). Since the sole predicate for the order of dismissal was Real Property Law § 235-f, and we find that statute inapplicable to the facts herein, we reverse and reinstate the petition.

Sandifer, J.

(dissenting). I respectfully dissent. In my opinion, the Civil Court correctly dismissed the petition. The fact that the tenant is presently incarcerated does not ipso facto alter the fact that the apartment in question is his primary residence; nor does it invalidate what would otherwise be a lawful roommate arrangement.

Parness, J. P., and Ostrau, J., concur; Sandifer, J., dissents in a separate memorandum.
#### Diamond’s Run Ltd., Plaintiff, v Rebel Fabrics, Inc., et al., Defendants.

Civil Court of the City of New York, Special Term, New York County,

January 29, 1987

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Marks, Murase & White*for defendants. *Herman Lieblich*for plaintiff.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard S. Lane, J.

In this action for money had and received arising out of a sale of goods, defendant Rebel Fabrics, Inc. moves to strike from the calendar and to stay pending arbitration.

With respect to the arbitration branch of the motion, the right thereto was asserted as an affirmative defense in the answer. It allegedly arose by reason of an arbitration clause *569contained in defendant’s salesman’s confirmation or acceptance of plaintiffs written purchase orders to which no objection was ever voiced by plaintiff until this motion. Plaintiff claims that it never received the salesman’s confirmation or acceptance.

Initially, plaintiff argues that this court has no jurisdiction to determine a motion pursuant to CPLR 7503. Plaintiff would be correct if this were a special proceeding prior to commencement of an action. Once an action has been commenced, however, CCA 206 specifically empowers determination by this court.

Secondly, plaintiff argues a waiver by defendant as a result of its participation in litigation. All defendant has done is to file an answer. It falls far short of the rule in *Sherrill v Grayco Bldrs.*(64 NY2d 261) and in *De Sapio v Kohlmeyer*(35 NY2d 402).

Finally, plaintiff argues that it is not bound by the arbitration clause because it materially alters the terms of the offer pursuant to UCC 2-207. Plaintiff is correct *(Matter of Marlene Indus. Corp. [Carnac Textiles],*45 NY2d 327).

Defendant seeks to avoid the *Marlene*rule *(supra)*by claiming that Federal substantive law governs this interstate contract and cites in support *Imptex Intl. Corp. v Lorprint*(625 F Supp 1572 [US Dist Ct, SDNY 1986]). Defendant has misread Judge Weinfeld’s opinion. He specifically relied on New York law. That Judge Weinfeld reaches a determination contrary to mine results from the fact that there the arbitration clause was contained not in an acceptance but in the initial contract document. State law was also applied by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in *Supak & Son Mfg. Co. v Pervel Indus.*(593 F2d 135).

The motion for a stay pending arbitration is denied.

With respect to the calendar branch of the motion, only four months intervened between joinder of issue and notice of trial. That is inadequate time especially where any disclosure proceeding by defendant would have jeopardized its arbitration position under the *Sherrill v Grayco Bldrs.*and *De Sapio*cases *(supra).*Now that the arbitration issue has been laid to rest, defendant should have an opportunity to seek disclosure, if so advised.

Motion to strike from the calendar is granted.
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-20 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-20 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-20 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-20 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-20 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-20 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-20 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-20 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-20 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 9 of 9
# C_2011093EN.01001501.xml

| 25.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/15

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 93/08

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | La Rochelle–Poitiers–Lyon |
| Period of validity of the contract | 1 November 2011-31 October 2015 |
| Deadline for submission of applications and tenders | | for applications (first step):
  6 May 2011 (12.00, local time) |

Member State

France

Route concerned

La Rochelle–Poitiers–Lyon

Period of validity of the contract

1 November 2011-31 October 2015

Deadline for submission of applications and tenders

for applications (first step):

6 May 2011 (12.00, local time)

| | for tenders (second step):
  17 June 2011 (12.00, local time) |
| --- | --- |

for tenders (second step):

17 June 2011 (12.00, local time)

Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

| Chambre de commerce et d’industrie de La Rochelle |
| --- |
| Rue de Jura |
| 17000 La Rochelle |
| FRANCE |

Chambre de commerce et d’industrie de La Rochelle

Rue de Jura

17000 La Rochelle

FRANCE

| Mr Thomas JUIN |
| --- |
| Director of La Rochelle — Île de Ré Airport |
| Chambre de commerce et d’industrie de La Rochelle |
| Rue de Jura |
| 17000 La Rochelle |
| FRANCE |
| Tel. +33 546423026 |
| Fax +33 546000484 |
| E-mail: t.juin@larochelle.aeroport.fr |

Mr Thomas JUIN

Director of La Rochelle — Île de Ré Airport

Chambre de commerce et d’industrie de La Rochelle

Rue de Jura

17000 La Rochelle

FRANCE

Tel. +33 546423026

Fax +33 546000484

E-mail: t.juin@larochelle.aeroport.fr

---
Case 1:06-cv-15119-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15119-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15119-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15119-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15119-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15119-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15119-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15119-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15119-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15119-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15119-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15119-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15119-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001096085

<NAME>                        Celexx Coropation

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS



<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                     522,471
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              2,212,298
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                422,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           3,391,340
<PP&E>                                     568,724
<DEPRECIATION>                             276,944
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             8,172,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      3,696,265
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   15,620
<OTHER-SE>                                 4,388,863
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               8,172,379
<SALES>                                    3,565,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           3,565,274
<CGS>                                      2,533,929
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              2,533,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           3,699,639
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           500,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         27,047
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,195,341)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,195,341)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,195,341)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.24)



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 60384)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         November 7-8, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Doubletree Hotel, 8120 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Roberta Binder, Ph.D., Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Room 3130, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-496-7966,                         *rbinder@niaid.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.956, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: October 17, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5234 Filed 10-23-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 04-50916

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 Plaintiff - Appellee

 v.

JOSE TRINIDAD GONZALEZ-CORTEZ

 Defendant - Appellant

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, El Paso

3:04-CR-1020-ALL-DB

---------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the

sentence is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to

remand case to the United States District Court for the Western

District of Texas, El Paso Division, for resentencing is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion in

the alternative to extend time to file appellee’s brief until 14

days from the Court’s denial of appellee’s motion to vacate and

remand is DENIED as moot.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 26, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
#### STATE v. PEREZ

No. 12P82.

Case below: 55 N.C. App. 92.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 May 1982.
#### STATE v. CARTER

No. 179P82.

Case below: 56 N.C. App. 435.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 June 1982.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000057497
<NAME> THE LAMSON & SESSIONS CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,754
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,951
<INVENTORY>                                     60,966
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               135,564
<PP&E>                                         131,014
<DEPRECIATION>                                  75,125
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 261,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,366
<BONDS>                                         77,722
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,369
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,017
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   261,379
<SALES>                                         88,291
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                88,291
<CGS>                                           65,424
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,462
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    37
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,410
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,434
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,976
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,976
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48


</TABLE>
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:10cr8-SPM

DONTAE PRATT, 

 

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Defendant proposed to enter a guilty plea to Counts One and Two of this

indictment. The district judge referred this matter to me for purposes of hearing

Defendant's proposed change of plea pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 and to enter a

report and recommendation as to whether to accept the change of plea. All parties

consented to this procedure, and the written consent has been entered. After hearing, it

is found that:

1. Defendant understands the nature of the charge or charges as to which the

plea is offered.

2. Defendant understands the right to trial by jury, to persist in a plea of not

guilty, to assistance of counsel at trial, and to confront and cross examine adverse

witnesses, and understands the right against compelled self-incrimination.
Page 2 of 3

3. Defendant understands the maximum possible sentence if the guilty plea is

accepted, including the effect of a supervised release term, understands that the

sentencing guidelines are advisory, and understands that the court has discretion to

depart from those guidelines and sentence up to the statutory maximum sentence.

4. The plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made,

and is not the result of force or threats, or of promises except for promises contained in

the written plea agreement between the parties.

5. Defendant is competent to plead guilty.

6. Defendant understands that answers given by the Defendant during the plea

colloquy, which were under oath, may be later used against the Defendant in

prosecution for perjury or false statement.

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant's guilty plea.

8. There is a plea agreement which should be accepted by the court. Defendant

understands the terms of the plea agreement.

9. Defendant has voluntarily consented to go forward with this plea of guilty

before me. Defendant knowingly and voluntarily has waived the ten day period for filing

objections to this report and recommendation, and agrees that written objections, if any,

must be filed within twenty-four hours from receipt of a copy of this report and

recommendation. The United States also consents to this procedure, including the

shorter period for objections.

Case No. 4:10cr8-SPM/WCS
Page 3 of 3

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court ACCEPT the plea agreement

and defendant's plea of guilty.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on April 2, 2010. 

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 24 hours after receiving a copy of this report and

recommendation.

Case No. 4:10cr8-SPM/WCS
Case 1:07-cv-03225-PKC-DCF     Document 30      Filed 01/23/2008     Page 1 of 1