alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997
<CASH>                                             706
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                       371
<INVENTORY>                                     11,348
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,853
<PP&E>                                          21,939
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,667
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,966
<BONDS>                                          1,121
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,257
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,797
<SALES>                                         36,751
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,751
<CGS>                                           30,747
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,364
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   147
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  91
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (629)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       104
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (733)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (733)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. TRUESDALE

No. 21 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 579.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 February 1978.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lannett Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Arthur P. Bedrosian, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Keith R. Ruck, the Interim Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Controller of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                        The Report complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: May 12, 2009 | /s/Arthur P. Bedrosian                                   |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                                     |
|                     | Arthur P. Bedrosian,                                     |
|                     | President and Chief Executive Officer                    |
|                     |                                                     |
|                     |                                                     |
| Dated: May 12, 2009 | /s/Keith R. Ruck                                         |
|                     |                                                     |
|                     | Keith R. Ruck,                                           |
|                     | Interim Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Controller |
|                     |                                                     |

 

----
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Royal Quantum Group, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Ron Ruskowsky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Royal Quantum Group, Inc., and will be retained by Royal Quantum Group, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
  /s/
      Ron RuskowskyRon
      Ruskowsky
                    Chief
      Executive and Financial Officer
                    April
       6, 2009
Case 1:07-cv-03398-BSJ Document 3 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03398-BSJ Document 3 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
# C_2011043EN.01000102.xml

| 11.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 43/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 43/1

---

Communication concerning the entry into force, in trade between the European Union and the countries of the Common Market of the South (Mercado Común del Sur — Mercosur), of the provisions laid down in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93, concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ for the purpose of applying tariff preferences granted by the European Union to certain products from developing countries (regional cumulation of origin)

2011/C 43/02

Article 86 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 (1), provides for regional cumulation to apply, inter alia, to those countries which are parties to the Agreement establishing the Common Market of the South (Mercado Común del Sur — Mercosur), in the context of the European Union's rules of origin applicable to the generalised system of preferences (GSP).

1

In particular, paragraph 2 of Article 86 includes a provision for the members of each of the regional groups mentioned to transmit to the European Commission, through the Secretariat of the regional group concerned or another competent joint body representing all the members of the group in question, undertakings to comply with the GSP rules of origin and to provide the necessary administrative cooperation for the control of certificates of origin Form A and invoice declarations.

Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay have met this obligation, and the provisions of regional cumulation therefore apply to these countries from 1 January 2011.

---

(1)  OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,993
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                       350
<INVENTORY>                                     32,849
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,310
<PP&E>                                          60,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,445
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 127,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,817
<BONDS>                                         28,833
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,999
<COMMON>                                         1,334
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,468
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   127,776
<SALES>                                         95,894
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                98,258
<CGS>                                           60,209
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,209
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,180
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,744
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,991
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,753
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,753
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 15 Filed 05/15/2008 Page 1 of 1
OAO 458 (Rev. 10/95) Appearance

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF

APPEARANCE

Case Number:

To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record:

Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for

I certify that I am admitted to practice in this court.

Date Signature

Print Name Bar Number

Address

City State Zip Code

Phone Number Fax Number

Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 37 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffrey R. Binder, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Biomet, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

September 10, 2008



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       
|/S/ JEFFREY R. BINDER                                  
|Jeffrey R. Binder President and Chief Executive
Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            DISTINCTIVE DEVICES, INC.

                       CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                          OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                          -----------------------------


         The undersigned, Sanjay Mody, the President, Chief Executive Officer,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Distinctive Devices, Inc. (the
"Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

         1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 26th day of May, 2004.

                                           /s/ SANJAY MODY
                                           ---------------
                                           Sanjay Mody
                                           President,
                                           Chief Executive Officer,
                                           Treasurer and
                                           Chief Financial Officer


                                       25
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE 

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING 

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

South Carolina Public Interest Foundation and Edward 

D. Sloan, Jr., individually, and on behalf of all others 

similarly situated, Petitioners, 

v. 

James Rozier, as Chairman of the Commission on the 

Department of Transportation, James H "Jay" Lucas, as 

Speaker of the S.C. House of Representatives, Henry D. 

McMaster, as President of the S.C. Senate, and The State 

of South Carolina, Respondents. 

Hugh K. Leatherman, Sr., in his capacity as President Pro 

Tempore of the South Carolina Senate, Intervenor. 

Appellate Case No. 2015-001443 

IN THE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 

Memorandum Opinion No. 2016-MO-019 

Heard March 22, 2016 – Filed May 18, 2016 

RELIEF DENIED 

James G. Carpenter, of Carpenter Law Firm, PC, of 

Greenville, for Petitioners. 
 

Andrew F. Lindemann, of Davidson & Lindemann, PA 

of Columbia, for Respondent James Rozier; Michael J. 

Anzelmo and Blake Terence Williams, both of Nelson 

Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP; and Richard L. 

Pearce, Patrick G. Dennis and Charles Fennell Reid; all 

of Columbia, for Respondent James H. "Jay" Lucas, Jr.; 

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Deputy 

Solicitor General J. Emory Smith, Jr., both of Columbia, 

for Respondents State of South Carolina and Lieutenant 

Governor Henry D. McMaster. 

Kenneth M. Moffitt and Edward Houseal Bender, both of 

Columbia, for Intervenor Hugh K. Leatherman, Sr. 

CHIEF JUSTICE PLEICONES: We agreed to hear this constitutional challenge 

to 2007 Act No. 114, § 6, which provides the authority to appoint the Secretary of 

Transportation devolves upon the Department of Transportation Commission 

under certain circumstances. After careful consideration of the briefs, and after 

oral argument, we find no merit to petitioners' challenge and therefore decline to 

issue the declaratory relief they seek. 

RELIEF DENIED. 

BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur. FEW, J., dissenting in a 

separate opinion. 
JUSTICE FEW: For the reasons explained in my dissenting opinion in S.C. Pub. 

Interest Found. v. Lucas, Op. No. 27638 (S.C. Sup. Ct. filed May 18, 2016) 

(Shearouse Adv. Sh. No. 20 at 30), I would dismiss this petition as not of sufficient 

public interest to justify the Court hearing it in our original jurisdiction. See Key v. 

Currie, 305 S.C. 115, 116, 406 S.E.2d 356, 357 (1991) ("Only when there is an 

extraordinary reason such as a question of significant public interest or an 

emergency will this Court exercise its original jurisdiction.").
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2047 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2047

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To provide for a 2-week extension of the Medicaid community mental 
     health services demonstration program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE MEDICAID COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 
              DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

    Section 223(d)(3) of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 
(42 U.S.C. 1396a note) is amended by striking ``June 30, 2019'' and 
inserting ``July 14, 2019''.

SEC. 2. MEDICAID IMPROVEMENT FUND.

    Section 1941(b)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396w-
1(b)(1)) is amended by striking ``$6,000,000'' and inserting 
``$1,000,000''.

            Passed the Senate June 27, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 2047

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To provide for a 2-week extension of the Medicaid community mental 
     health services demonstration program, and for other purposes.
```
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2106 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit smoking on the premises 

of any facility of the Veterans Health Administration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 11, 2019 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. BROWN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. 

MARKEY, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. REED, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. CARPER, Mr. 

MERKLEY, Ms. HIRONO, and Mr. KAINE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit smoking 

on the premises of any facility of the Veterans Health 

Administration, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON SMOKING IN FACILITIES OF 

4 THE VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1715 of title 38, 

7 United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2106 IS

1 ‘‘§ 1715. Prohibition on smoking in facilities of the 

2 Veterans Health Administration 

3 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—No person (including any vet4 eran, patient, resident, employee of the Department, con5 tractor, or visitor) may smoke on the premises of any facil6 ity of the Veterans Health Administration. 

7 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

8 ‘‘(1) The term ‘facility of the Veterans Health 

9 Administration’ means any land or building (includ10 ing any medical center, nursing home, domiciliary 

11 facility, outpatient clinic, or center that provides re12 adjustment counseling) that is— 

13 ‘‘(A) under the jurisdiction of the Depart14 ment of Veterans Affairs; 

15 ‘‘(B) under the control of the Veterans 

16 Health Administration; and 

17 ‘‘(C) not under the control of the General 

18 Services Administration. 

19 ‘‘(2) The term ‘smoke’ includes— 

20 ‘‘(A) the use of cigarettes, cigars, pipes, 

21 and any other combustion or heating of to22 bacco; and 

23 ‘‘(B) the use of any electronic nicotine de24 livery system, including electronic or e-ciga25 rettes, vape pens, and e-cigars.’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2106 IS

1 (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sec2 tions at the beginning of subchapter II of chapter 17 

3 of such title is amended by striking the item relating 

4 to section 1715 and inserting the following new 

5 item: 

‘‘1715. Prohibition on smoking in facilities of the Veterans Health Administration.’’. 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 526 of the 

7 Veterans Health Care Act of 1992 (Public Law 102–585; 

8 38 U.S.C. 1715 note) is repealed. 

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this section take effect on October 1, 2019. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10.1(q)

Eyecity.com, Inc., 79 Express Street, Plainview, NY  11803
Phone:  516-822-5000   Fax:  516-822-5520

                                                               December 29, 1999

James J. Armenakis
65 Bleecker Street
New York, NY  10012

                           FINDERS AGREEMENT AMENDMENT

Dear Jim:

This will constitute and confirm our amendment to the Finders Agreement dated
March 16, 1999 for James J. Armenakis (the "Armenakis") to act as a finder for
Eyecity.com, Inc. (the "Company"), in accordance with the terms, provisions and
conditions of the Finders Agreement.

1.    Section 2 Compensation, shall be amended to have the following sentence
      added thereto:

      Armenakis shall have the right to have the compensation due under this
      Finders Agreement payable in cash and Company stock options as follows:
      ten (10%) percent of the funds invested on an equity basis payable in
      cash, and the stock options issued in accordance with this Section 2
      reduced by fifty (50%) percent. This payment would be in lieu of all the
      compensation payable in Company stock options.

2.    All other terms and conditions of the Finders Agreement remain in full
      force and effect.

If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding, will you kindly
signify same by signing this Finders Agreement Amendment in the space provided
below.

                                          Sincerely,
Agreed and Accepted                       EYECITY.COM, INC.
as of the above date

James J. Armenakis                        Mark H. Levin
                                          President
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 16 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 16 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 3, 2013

d0826

Order 

Clerk

September 3, 2013

147096

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147096

COA: 308410

Wayne CC: 11-009139-01-FC

DERRICK BERNARD WESTBROOK,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 14, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 99-40726 

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-40726

Conference Calendar

 

WILLIAM STANLEY FRY,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-98-CV-196

--------------------

April 12, 2000

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Texas prisoner William Stanley Fry, through counsel,

challenges the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254

habeas corpus petition as time-barred, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2244(d). Specifically, he contends that the district court

erred in failing to conclude that the limitations period was

tolled, pursuant to § 2244(d)(2), during the 90-day period in 

which he could have sought a writ of certiorari from the United 
No. 99-40726 

-2-

 

** This decision was rendered after the district court

granted a certificate of appealability in the instant case.

States Supreme Court. His argument is without merit. See Ott v.

Johnson, 192 F.3d 510, 513 (5th Cir. 1999).**

Fry has abandoned his argument that the limitations period

should have been equitably tolled during the pendency of his

unsuccessful motions for leave to file an untimely petition for

discretionary review and during the time he could have sought

reconsideration of those denials. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d

222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). He argues instead, for the first

time on appeal, the limitations period should have been tolled

during the time he could have sought reconsideration of the state

appellate court’s denial of his habeas application. Fry moves to

have the question certified to the Texas Court of Criminal

Appeals. Because the argument is raised for the first time on

appeal, we will not consider it. See Leverette v. Louisville

Ladder Co., 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999). The motion to

certify questions to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals is

DENIED. 

Fry’s appeal is without arguable merit and is therefore

DISMISSED. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED.