alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2  Section 906 Certificate  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Luxfer Holdings PLC, a public limited company incorporated under English law (the company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:  The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Form 20-F) of the company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.   Date: March 14,   2017
/s/ Andrew Michael   BeadenAndrew Michael BeadenGroup Finance Director
#### ALTON B. BELL v. MARY LOU SMITH.

(Filed 30 September, 1964)

Insane Persons § 10; Process § 6—

Where service of process in a civil action is made upon defendant who is *non compos mentis,*the court correctly refuses to quash the summons and vacate the service, but the court should see to it that defendant is properly represented before any action is taken which is detrimental to his interests.

Appeal by defendant from *Riddle, S. J.,*March 2, 1964 Non-Jury Civil Term, Gaston Superior Court.

The plaintiff instituted this civil action against the defendant for actual and punitive damages based on her alleged “false, slanderous, and malicious charges" which are detailed in the complaint. The Sheriff of Wake County served the summons and copy of the complaint on the defendant who at the time was confined in the State Hospital for the Insane, to which institution she had been committed by order of the Superior Court of Gaston County upon a jury finding that she did not have sufficient mental capacity to plead .to a bill of indictment charging her with the crime of murder. Defendant’s counsel undertook to enter a special appearance and moved to quash the summons and vacate the service because of her incompetency. From the order overruling the motion, the defendant appealed.

*William N. Puett, Berlin H. Carpenter, Jr., for plaintiff appellee.*

*Hollowell ■& Stott, and Frank P. Cooke, by Grady B. Stott for defendant appellant.*

Per Curiam.

If a defendant in a civil action is *non compos mentis,*he must defend by general or testamentary guardian if he has one within the State, otherwise by guardian *ad litem*to be appointed by the court. *Hood v. Holding,*205 N.C. 451, 171 S.E. 633. The court may not quash the service on an incompetent, but should see to it that he is properly represented before any action is taken which is detrimental to his interests. Either party, or the court upon its own motion, may initiate proceedings for the appointment of a guardian *ad litem*before any hearing on the merits.

Affirmed.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1861 

To provide for the treatment of a pharmacy counter refusal as a coverage 

determination under Medicare part D. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 13, 2019 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself and Mr. CORNYN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide for the treatment of a pharmacy counter refusal 

as a coverage determination under Medicare part D. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Streamlining Part D 

5 Appeals Process Act’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1861 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROVIDING FOR THE TREATMENT OF A PHARMACY 

2 COUNTER REFUSAL AS A COVERAGE DETER3 MINATION UNDER MEDICARE PART D. 

4 Section 1860D–4(g) of the Social Security Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 1395w–104(g)) is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(3) TREATMENT OF PHARMACY COUNTER RE8 FUSAL AS COVERAGE DETERMINATION.—For plan 

9 years beginning on or after January 1, 2020, the re10 fusal by a pharmacy to fill a prescription for a cov11 ered part D drug under a prescription drug plan 

12 shall be treated as a coverage determination subject 

13 to reconsideration and appeal pursuant to this sub14 section and subsection (h).’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-9      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 1 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-9      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 2 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-9      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 3 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-9      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 4 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-9      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 5 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-9      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 6 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-9      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 7 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-9      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 8 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-9      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 9 of 9
#### STATE v. SHACKLEFORD

No. 466P82.

Case below: 56 N.C. App. 815.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 25 August 1982.
Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-27      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-27      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 2 of 2
---

---

Exhibit 14(a)

# Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors ECtel Ltd. Rosh Haayin Israel

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-83736) on Form F-3 and registration
statement on form S-8 of ECtel Ltd. (No. 333-127576) of our report dated June 7, 2006,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of ECtel Ltd. as of December 31, 2005 and
2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders
equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2005, which report appears in the December 31, 2005 Annual Report on form 20-f of ECtel
Ltd.

Somekh ChaikinCertified Public Accountants (Israel)A member firm of KPMG International

Tel Aviv, IsraelJune 15, 2006



---

---
# C_2011085EN.01001301.xml

| 18.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/13

---

Corrigendum to the information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 78 of 11 March 2011
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 78 of 11 March 2011

2011/C 85/08

On page 20:

for:

| ‘Reference number of the State Aid | SA.31163’, |
| --- | --- |

‘Reference number of the State Aid

SA.31163’,

read:

| ‘Reference number of the State Aid | X 282/10 (SA.31163)’. |
| --- | --- |

‘Reference number of the State Aid

X 282/10 (SA.31163)’.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel Management of Information Resources on Therapeutic Agents.                    

*Date:*                         November 12, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         North Bethesda Marriott, 5701 Marinelli Road, Bethesda, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ileana M. Ponce-Gonzalez, MD, MPH, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-3679,                         *ipgonzalez@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research, 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 15, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5204 Filed 10-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### STATE v. RIDDLE

No. 79 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 280.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 June 1979. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 June 1979.
#### Thomas A. Terpening, Plaintiff, v David A. Wait, as Saratoga County District Attorney, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Saratoga County,

March 30,1987

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*John M. Hogan, Jr.,*for plaintiff. *David A. Wait, District Attorney,*defendant *pro se (Donna J. Arnold*of counsel), for David A. Wait, defendant.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Loren N. Brown, J.

This action was brought to recover a sum of money, seized by law enforcement officers as allegedly evidence of illegal drug sales. The plaintiff has served a summons, and now seeks summary judgment in lieu of complaint (CPLR 3213) on the grounds that forfeiture proceedings were not commenced in a timely fashion. The defendant has opposed the motion, in part, on the grounds that CPLR 3213, proceeding by summons in lieu of complaint, is not procedurally proper.

On October 20, 1986, the plaintiff was arrested and charged with drug and firearm related offenses. In his possession and seized was $5,045. After the seizure, the plaintiff was given an *1044inventory receipt for the money, and because of that receipt, the plaintiff, claiming that it is an instrument for the payment of money only, has chosen to proceed by a motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint.

A motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint is available when the "action is based upon an instrument for the payment of money only or upon any judgment”. (CPLR 3213.) In order to qualify as "an instrument for the payment of money only”, the instrument must establish on its face a prima facie case. *(Seaman-Andwall Corp. v Wright Mach. Corp.,*31 AD2d 136.) If extrusion evidence is necessary to prove the plaintiff’s case, the instrument does not qualify. *(Channel Excavators v Amato Trucking Corp.,*48 Misc 2d 429.) An inventory receipt would not, on its face, establish a case for repayment of the amount received. The plaintiff’s motion papers reflect the need to prove more than that which appears on the face of the receipt.

Accordingly, the court finds that CPLR 3213 is inappropriate, and summary judgment is denied, without costs. The complaint shall be served within 20 days after the entry of the order on this motion; the answer shall be served within 20 days of receipt of the complaint.
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 23-4 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 23-4 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
form10kexh1023_082409.htm


EXHIBIT 10.22

 

 

 

Narrative Summary of American Consumers, Inc.

Director Compensation Arrangements





The following is a description of the current director compensation arrangements for American Consumers, Inc. (the “Company”).





During fiscal 2009, all Company directors (including both employee and non-employee directors) received cash payments of $300.00 per month for service as directors, plus reimbursement for reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board of Directors and any Board committee on which a director serves (applicable only to certain
non-employee directors who must travel to attend such meetings).  Directors who are members of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors do not receive any additional compensation for such committee service.





The Board of Directors of the Company, acting upon the recommendations of management and the Board’s Compensation Committee, voted on July 30, 2009 to make the following changes to the director compensation arrangements described above:






	
  
	
·
	
Effective September 1, 2009, the directors’ compensation will increase to $325 per month, plus reimbursement for reasonable expenses incurred in attendance at meetings (applicable only to certain non-employee directors who must travel to attend such meetings).  As in prior years, directors who are members of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors will not receive
additional compensation for such committee service.









	
  
	
·
	
Additionally, director Paul R. Cook, who also serves as ACI’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (the Company’s principal financial officer), was eligible in fiscal 2009 and prior fiscal years to receive a discretionary cash bonus equal to the fixed percentage (4%) of the Company’s net income before taxes for such year.  For fiscal 2010, Mr. Cook will be eligible to receive
a discretionary cash bonus equal to five percent (5%) of the Company’s net income before taxes for such year.








The amount of any bonus ultimately paid to Company officers will be determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee.  In the usual case, if the Company is profitable bonuses will be paid at the targeted levels.  As reported in the Company’s proxy statement for its 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Mr.
Cook was paid a bonus in the amount of $2,983 with respect the Company’s performance in fiscal 2009.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MITCHELL M. MONTEVERDI,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:10-cv-77-SPM-WCS

DENNIS A. WILLIAMSON,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation (doc. 21). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy and has been

afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code,

Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report

and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 21) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The Motion to Dismiss (doc. 12) is granted, and the case is

dismissed as moot.

3. The Motion for Temporary Injunction (doc. 1) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this seventh day of October, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
Exhibit 32.2



Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, James D. Brown, the Chief Financial Officer of NutriSystem, Inc.
(the Company), hereby certifies that based on the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | The Companys Form 10-K Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: March 28, 2005 |  | /S/ JAMES D. BROWN                   
|                      |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
#### VAUGHN v. COUNTY OF DURHAM

No. 100 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 416.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 24 January 1978.
Case 1:07-cr-00356-RMB Document 14 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cr-00356-RMB Document 14 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cr-00356-RMB Document 14 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 192 (Thursday, October 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 56727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4948]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 2 p.m., Wednesday, October 23, 2007.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: Enforcement Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-4948 Filed 10-2-07; 11:22 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
#### STATE v. WEST

No. 136 PC.

Case below: 17 N.C. App. 5.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 February 1973.
CERTIFICATION OF
                      TREASURER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, the undersigned, Samir N. Masri, who is
the Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Lincoln International Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2007, (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Sec.13(a) or Sec.15(d) as applicable, of the Securities
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                           /s/ Samir N. Masri
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Samir N. Masri
                                           Title: Treasurer and Chief Financial
                                                  Officer
                                           Date:  March 9, 2007
**EXHIBIT 31**

I, Eric Montandon certify that: 

1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB (“Report”) of Asia4Sale.com, Inc.; 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the period presented in this Report; 

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared; 

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and 

c)     Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: April 9, 2007 

/s/ Eric Montandon 

Eric Montandon 

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer 

**25**

----