alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 56777)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel; Conference Grants.                    

*Date:*                         November 27, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Democracy 2, Suite 200 Large Conference Room, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Prabha L. Atreya, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-8633,                         *atreyapr@mail.nih.gov.*

Dated: September 28, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 07-4918  Filed 10-3-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 25 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 20 of 20
#### SIMS v. MOBILE HOMES

No. 71 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 25.

Petition by défendant Virginia Homes Mfg. Corp. for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 November 1975.
# C_2011026EN.01003301.xml

| 28.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/33

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 26/17

| Member State | United Kingdom |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | — | Oban–Coll |

Member State

United Kingdom

Concerned routes

—

Oban–Coll

| — | Oban–Colonsay |
| --- | --- |

—

Oban–Colonsay

| — | Oban–Tiree |
| --- | --- |

—

Oban–Tiree

| — | Coll–Tiree |
| --- | --- |

—

Coll–Tiree

Period of validity of the contract

1 April 2011-31 March 2014

Deadline for submission of tenders

Two months after the date of publication of this notice

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the pubic tender and the modified public service obligations can be obtained

| Argyll and Bute Council |
| --- |
| Council Offices |
| Kilmory |
| Lochgilphead |
| Argyll |
| PA31 8RT |
| Scotland |
| UNITED KINGDOM |
| Tel. +44 1546604141 |
| Fax +44 1546606443 |
| Contact: Sandy Mactaggart, Development and Infrastructure Services |
| E-mail: sandy.mactaggart@argyll-bute.gov.uk |

Argyll and Bute Council

Council Offices

Kilmory

Lochgilphead

Argyll

PA31 8RT

Scotland

UNITED KINGDOM

Tel. +44 1546604141

Fax +44 1546606443

Contact: Sandy Mactaggart, Development and Infrastructure Services

E-mail: sandy.mactaggart@argyll-bute.gov.uk

---
#### STATE v. SCARBORO

No. 57 PC.

Case below: 38 N.C. App. 105.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 1978.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2342

ANTHONY E. SYDNOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior 

District Judge. (4:11-cv-00013-JLK-BWC)

Submitted: April 24, 2012 Decided: May 24, 2012

Before KING, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony E. Sydnor, Appellant Pro Se. Ameenah M. Lloyd, SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony E. Sydnor appeals the district court’s order 

rejecting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and affirming 

the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny Sydnor a 

period of supplemental security income benefits. We must uphold 

the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by 

substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See

Johnson v. Barnhart, 434 F.3d 650, 653 (4th Cir. 2005) (per 

curiam) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006)). We have thoroughly 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Sydnor v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 4:11-cv-00013-JLK-BWC (W.D. 

Va. Nov. 22, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

SourceForge, Inc.Mountain View, California

We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-92409;
333-92391; 333-38768; 333-38766; 333-38874; 333-59096; 333-71944; 333-101965;
and 333-116778) of SourceForge, Inc. of our reports dated October 8, 2007,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule and the effects of the adjustments to the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended July 31, 2005 to retrospectively apply the change
as discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, and the
related financial statement schedule, and managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of SourceForge, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting, which appears
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1.

|/s/ Stonefield Josephson, Inc.  | 
|------------------------------- | 
|                                | 
|San Francisco,
      California | 
|October 17,
      2007          | 

---
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-6 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-6 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-6 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-6 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-6 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-6 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 6 of 6
#### JUSTIN ROBINSON v. FREDERICK TAYLOR and LILLIAN E. ROBINSON v. FREDERICK TAYLOR.

(Filed 19 September 1962)

1. Appeal and Error § 20—

Appellant may not complain of error in regard to an issue answered in bis favor.

2. Trial § 52—

A motion to set aside the verdict for inadequacy of the award is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and the court’s ruling thereon is not reviewable when no abuse of discretion is shown.

Appeal by plaintiffs from *Parker, J.,*March 1962 Term of CaRteRet.

These two civil actions grew out of a collision between the automobile operated by defendant and the automobile owned and operated by the male plaintiff in which his wife, the *feme*plaintiff, was a passenger. Plaintiffs alleged that the collision occurred when the defendant lost control of his vehicle because of excessive speed and intoxication and drove his vehicle to his left of the center of the highway. Each seeks to recover his damages sustained in the collision. Mrs. Robinson alleged personal injuries in the amount of $15,000.00; Mr. Robinson, personal injuries of $3,000.00 and property damage in the amount of $1,950.00.

The defendant’s answer was a general denial; there was no plea of contributory negligence and no counterclaim. The two cases were consolidated for trial. Each plaintiff testified as to his injuries and offered in evidence the subpoena issued by the defendant for the doctor who had treated plaintiffs. The defendant offered no evidence.

The jury answered the issues of negligence in favor of the plaintiffs. Mrs. Robinson was awarded $1,000.00 for her personal injuries; Mr. Robinson recovered $50.00 for personal injuries and $1,050.00 for damages to his automobile. Both plaintiffs appealed. *Inter alia,*they assign as errors the failure of the trial judge to give a peremptory instruc*669tion on the issues of negligence and to set the verdict aside for inadequacy.

*Hamilton, Hamilton ■& Phillips for plaintiffs.*

*Claude R. Wheatly, Jr., and Thomas S. Bennett for defendant.*

PER CuRiam.

This case involved settled, uncomplicated rules of law. The answer raised issues of fact which the jury resolved in favor of the plaintiffs who, nevertheless, were disappointed in the amount of damages awarded them. If there were any errors in the rulings on evidence or in the charge with reference to the first issues they were rendered harmless when the jury answered them in favor of the plaintiffs. *Lyon v. R. R.,*165 N.C. 143, 81 S.E. 1. The assignments of error which relate to the issue of damages disclose no prejudicial error. The trial judge who heard the evidence and observed the parties declined to set the verdict aside. This was a matter within his discertion. *Dixon v. Young,*255 N.C. 578, 122 S.E. 2d 202. No abuse appears.

No error.
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

XXXXX, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 -againstXXXXX, 

 Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------------X 

 XX Civ. XXXX (AKH) 

INITIATING COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Case Management Order No. __ (“CMO __”) dated June __, 2007 by Hon. 

Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J., in In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site 

Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH), Plaintiff(s) hereby submit this Initiating Complaint against the 

above named Defendants and state: 

1. Plaintiff ____________ (XXXX) [Å last 4 digits of social security number] 

currently resides at ______________. 

2. Plaintiff(s) have a claim for injury against the Defendants named above that 

would be encompassed within the scope of the In Re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan 

Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

3. Plaintiffs will file a fully complete Check-Off Complaint under this docket 

number within 30 days of the filing of this Initiating Complaint. 

Case 1:07-cv-03480-AKH Document 4-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE TO CLERK OF COURT: Please accept this Initiating Complaint as an initial pleading 

pursuant to CMO __, dated ____________, of Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein in In Re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

Dated: _____ __, 200X 

{law firm name} 

Attorney(s) for 

Plaintiff(s)_______________________ 

By: ________ 

 {name} 

{law firm address} 

Telephone: _______________ 

Case 1:07-cv-03480-AKH Document 4-4 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. BROOKS

No. 63 PC.

Case below: 38 N.C. App. 48.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 November 1978. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 3 November 1978.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the filing of Franchise Holdings International, Inc.’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2016 (the “Report”), I, Michael Johnston, the Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                         |     |                                                  | 
|------------------------ | --- | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|Date: September 22, 2017 | By: | */s/ Michael Johnston*                           | 
|                         |     | Michael Johnston Interim Chief Financial Officer |
#### PARTIN v. POWER AND LIGHT CO.

No. 169 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 630.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 12 July 1979.
Case 1:07-cv-03469-PKL Document 8 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 1 of 6Case 1:07-cv-03469-PKL Document 8 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 2 of 6Case 1:07-cv-03469-PKL Document 8 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 3 of 6Case 1:07-cv-03469-PKL Document 8 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 4 of 6Case 1:07-cv-03469-PKL Document 8 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 5 of 6Case 1:07-cv-03469-PKL Document 8 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 6 of 6
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54697-54698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4759]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of Biomaxx Systems, Inc.; Order of Suspension of 
Trading

September 24, 2007.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that the 
market for securities of Biomaxx Systems, Inc. (``Biomaxx,'' trading 
symbol BMXSF), may be reacting to manipulative forces or deceptive 
practices and that there is insufficient current public information 
about the issuer upon which an informed investment decision may be 
made, particularly concerning (1) the identity of and prior securities 
fraud judgments against persons who appear to be involved in the offer 
and sale, or in connection with the purchase or sale, of Biomaxx 
shares; (2) the financial performance and business prospects of 
Biomaxx; and (3) offerings to foreign investors and any restrictions on 
the resale of shares.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed company.

[[Page 54698]]

    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed 
company is suspended for the period of 9:30 a.m. EDT, September 24, 
2007 through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on October 5, 2007.

    By the Commission.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-4759 Filed 9-24-07; 1:11 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Case 1:05-cv-05098-MBM Document 4 Filed 05/31/2005 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:05-cv-05098-MBM Document 4 Filed 05/31/2005 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-11 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 8Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-11 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 2 of 8Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-11 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 3 of 8Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-11 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 4 of 8Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-11 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 5 of 8Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-11 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 6 of 8Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-11 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 7 of 8Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-11 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 8 of 8
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Great Plains Energy Incorporated (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Michael J. Chesser, as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Terry Bassham, as Executive Vice President - Finance and Strategic Development and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Michael J. ChesserName:

Title:
Michael J. Chesser

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
May 6, 2010/s/ Terry BasshamName:

Title:
Terry Bassham

Executive Vice President – Finance and Strategic Development and Chief Financial OfficerDate:
May 6, 2010





This certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.  This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liability under that section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 except to the extent this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Great Plains Energy Incorporated and will be retained by Great Plains Energy Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 202 (Friday, October 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 59309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5153]



[[Page 59309]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Power 
Poles, Inc., United States District Court for the District of Puerto 
Rico, Civil No. 07-1802 (FAB) (Docket 2), was lodged with the United 
States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico on August 30, 
2007.
    This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the 
United States against Power Poles, Inc., pursuant to Section 301(a) of 
the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311(a), to obtain injunctive relief and 
impose civil penalties against the Defendant for violating the Clean 
Water Act by discharging fill material without a permit into waters of 
the United States. The proposed Consent Decree resolves these 
allegations by requiring the Defendant to pay a civil penalty. In 
addition, the Consent Decree requires the Defendant to deposit funds 
into an escrow account for use as In Lieu Fee Mitigation.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Isabel 
Mu[ntilde]oz Acosta, Torre Chard[oacute]n, Suite 1201, 350 Carlos 
Chard[oacute]n Ave., San Juan, Puerto Rico 00918, and refer to United 
States v. Power Poles, Inc., United States District Court for the 
District of Puerto Rico, Civil No. 07-1802 (FAB) (Docket 2).
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, 150 
Carlos Chard[oacute]n Street, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00918. In addition, 
the proposed Consent Decree may be viewed at http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html.

Isabel Mu[ntilde]oz Acosta,
Assistant United States Attorney, for the District of Puerto Rico.
[FR Doc. 07-5153 Filed 10-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 10 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 10 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 2 of 2