alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

IN ADMIRALTY

In the Matter of: 

Capt. A III, Inc., owner of the 

vessel Capt. Anderson III, in 

cause of action for exoneration

from, or limited liability,

CASE NO. 5:10-cv-002/RS-MD

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Motion to Close Monition Period filed by Capt. A. III, Inc. as 

owner of the vessel Capt. Anderson III, with respect to all claims arising out of the 

incident occurring on June 29, 2009, as more fully set forth in the Complaint for 

Exoneration or for Limitation of Liability (Doc. 1).

Pursuant to Supplemental Rules F(4) and F(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure and this Court’s Order of January 20, 2010 (Doc. 9), potential claimants were

properly notified of the pendency of this action and admonished to file their respective 

claims, and should they wish to contest the complaint, to file their answers on or before 

April 20, 2010.

Two claimants, Chris Fields and Marla Miller, appeared and filed claims as well 

as answers to the complaint. These two claims have now been settled. No other 

claimants have appeared and filed claims and filed answers to contest the complaint.
IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Motion to Close Monition Period (Doc. 40) is GRANTED. 

2. The monition period is now closed.

3. Capt. A. III, Inc., as the owner of the vessel Capt. Anderson III, is discharged

from all liability arising out of the incident of June 29, 2009.

4. The security issued by Great American Insurance Company is discharged,

and the surety is released.

ORDERED on November 1, 2010

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2011102EN.01001401.xml

| 2.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/14

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 102/07

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 13.1.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 13.1.2011-31.12.2011 |
| Member State | France |
| Stock or Group of stocks | DWS/56789- |
| Species | Deep-sea sharks |
| Zone | EU and international waters of V, VI, VII, VIII and IX |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 45903 |

Date and time of closure

13.1.2011

Duration

13.1.2011-31.12.2011

Member State

France

Stock or Group of stocks

DWS/56789-

Species

Deep-sea sharks

Zone

EU and international waters of V, VI, VII, VIII and IX

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

45903

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
#### STATE v. McMANUS

No. 20 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 751.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 March 1978.
March 28, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KATHERINE MARCUM, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00197-CV V.

DOW CORNING CORPORATION, DOW CORNING WRIGHT 

CORPORATION, CHRIS ROBINSON MD, JAMES R. CULLINGTON MD, 

FRANCIS BURTON MD, SIMON FREDERICKS MD, TOLBERT WILKINSON 

MD, 21 INTERNATIONAL HOLDINS FKA KNOLL INTERNATIONAL, 

MILTON ROWLEY MD, WESLEY WASHBURN MD, PRESTON CHANDLER 

MD, WILSHIRE FOAM PRODUCTS INC., ERNEST CRONIN MD, JAMES 

PETERSON MD, FRANK J. GEROW MD, THOMAS CRONIN MD, BAXTER 

HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, DOW 

CHEMICAL COMPANY AND MEC SUBSIDIARY INC., Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

order signed by the court below on January 29, 2013. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Katherine Marcum, now known as Katherine Marcum Spiars.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TIMOTHY LEE QUALLS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv54/MCR/MD

SANTA ROSA COUNTY JAIL,

Defendant.

 /

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge filed on March 4, 2010, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after

reviewing objections to the Recommendation, if any, the Recommendation is

adopted as the opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and the clerk is directed to close the file.

3. The clerk is further directed to send plaintiff a copy of the form for use

in Section 2254 cases, as well as a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and a

Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of March, 2010.

 s/M. Case Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 1:07-cv-03552-LAP-DFE Document 5 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03552-LAP-DFE Document 5 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03552-LAP-DFE Document 5 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03552-LAP-DFE Document 5 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03552-LAP-DFE Document 5 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 5 of 5
#### CONSTRUCTION CO. v. HIGHWAY COMMISSION

No. 112 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 593.

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 June 1976.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1759 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

456 North Meridian Street in Indianapolis, Indiana, as the ‘‘Richard 

G. Lugar Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 10, 2019 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself and Mr. YOUNG) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 456 North Meridian Street in Indianapolis, 

Indiana, as the ‘‘Richard G. Lugar Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RICHARD G. LUGAR POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 456 North Meridian Street in 

6 Indianapolis, Indiana, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Richard G. Lugar Post Office Building’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1759 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Richard G. Lugar 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         114,878
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    306,664
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,549
<PP&E>                                       9,536,147
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,887,256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,218,104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,878,956
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,502,065
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,332,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,218,104
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               356,113
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             141,788
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (495,882)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (495,882)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (495,882)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        




</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

O MNIBUS AMEND MENTS TO THE

R EGULATIONS OF THE

PENNSYLVANIA JUDICIAL ETHICS

ADVISORY BOARD :

:

:

:

:

:

: NO

. 614

JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28 th day of February , 20 2 4

, pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of

the Constitution of Pennsylvania, IT IS ORDERED that:

The Regulations of the Pennsylvania Judicial Ethics Advisory Board are amended

in the attached form.

This ORDER shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. 10 3(b) and shall be

effective immediately.

Additions to the rule s are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule s are shown in bold and in brackets.
KAHN GAUTHIER SWICK, LLC 

Michael A. Swick (MS-9970) 

Kim E. Miller (KM-6996) 

12 East 41st Street, 12th Floor 

New York, NY 10017 

Telephone: (212) 696-3730 

Fax: (504) 455-1498 

KAHN GAUTHIER SWICK, LLC 

Lewis S. Kahn 

650 Poydras Street, Suite 2150 

New Orleans, LA 70130 

Telephone: (504) 455-1400 

Fax: (504) 455-1498 

Counsel for the Chen Group and 

Proposed Lead Counsel for the Class 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

BRICKMAN INVESTMENTS, INC., 

Individually And On Behalf of All Others 

Similarly Situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ALLOT COMMUNICATIONS, LTD., YIGAL 

JACOBY, RAMI HADAR AND ADI SAPIR,

 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

DOCKET NUMBER: 07-cv-3455 

HON. RICHARD J. HOLWELL 

(Caption continued on the following page) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING RELATED ACTIONS; APPOINTING LEAD 

PLAINTIFF; AND TO APPROVE PROPOSED LEAD PLAINTIFF’S CHOICE OF 

COUNSEL 

Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 11-2 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 3
GERALD BILGER, Individually And On Behalf 

of All Others Similarly Situated, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ALLOT COMMUNICATIONS, LTD., YIGAL 

JACOBY, RAMI HADAR AND ADI SAPIR,

 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

DOCKET NUMBER: 07-cv-3815 

HON. RICHARD J. HOLWELL 

ELIYAHU MOKHTAR, Individually And On 

Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ALLOT COMMUNICATIONS, LTD., YIGAL 

JACOBY, RAMI HADAR AND ADI SAPIR,

 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

DOCKET NUMBER: 07-cv-5456 

HON. RICHARD J. HOLWELL 

SHANNON VINSON, Individually And On 

Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ALLOT COMMUNICATIONS, LTD., YIGAL 

JACOBY, RAMI HADAR AND ADI SAPIR,

 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

DOCKET NUMBER: 07-cv-5457 

HON. RICHARD J. HOLWELL 

Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 11-2 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 2 of 3
Having considered the motion of the Chen Group to consolidate all related cases, to be 

appointed Lead Plaintiff, and to approve proposed Lead Plaintiff’s choice of counsel, and all 

papers in support thereof and in opposition thereto, and oral argument, if any, and good cause 

appearing therefor: 

1. The Actions are hereby consolidated; 

2. The Chen Group is hereby appointed Lead Plaintiff for the Class pursuant to Section 

27(a)(3)(B) of the Securities Act of 1933; and 

3. The law firm of Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC is hereby appointed Lead Counsel for 

Lead Plaintiff and the Class. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ___________________ 

THE HONORABLE RICHARD J. HOLWELL 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 11-2 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
KNICKERBOCKER VILLAGE, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   484093
<ALLOWANCES>                                    249000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1401848
<PP&E>                                        16824951
<DEPRECIATION>                                10130127
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9407913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1480517
<BONDS>                                        6048261
<COMMON>                                        317048
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      941999
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9407913
<SALES>                                        6951938
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6981904
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6898213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 20596
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              483726
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  83691
<INCOME-TAX>                                     29000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              54691
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     54691
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. SPELLMAN

No. 150 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 591.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 12 July 1979.
#### BURKHEAD v. WHITE

No. 52 P.C.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 432.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 24 September 1974.
#### STATE v. HOYLE

No. 299P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 288.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 July 1982.
#### STATE v. CARSWELL

No. 172 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 752.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 12 July 1979.
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 5 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 5 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 2 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 5 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 3 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 5 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 4 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 5 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 5 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 5 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 6 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 5 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 7 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 5 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 8 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 5 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 9 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 5 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 10 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 5 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 11 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 5 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 12 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 5 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 13 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 5 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 14 of 14
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1996
<CASH>                                          282373
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    43465
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                325838
<PP&E>                                         3591506
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2456901
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1460443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            81474
<BONDS>                                           9043
<COMMON>                                        816160
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      173275
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1460443
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 87493
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    94451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               16516
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 693614
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             693614
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    693614
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
- Text56: 
    - Text57: 
    - Text58: 
    - Text61: 
    - Text62: 
    - Text63: 
    - Text65: 
    - Text66: 
    - Text67: 
    - Text68: 
    - Text69: 
    - Text70: 
    - Text71: 
    - Text72: 
    - Text73: 
    - Text74:
Case 1:05-cv-04950-MBM Document 4-2 Filed 06/06/2005 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:05-cv-04950-MBM Document 4-2 Filed 06/06/2005 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:05-cv-04950-MBM Document 4-2 Filed 06/06/2005 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard R. Walters, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(a)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and will be retained by Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: May 12, 2006







By   /s/ Richard R. Walters

Richard R. Walters, President













































1
#### SNIDER v. DICKENS

No. 84 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 388.

Petition by third party defendant Kenneth Douglas Snider for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 3 May 1977.
#### RAGLAND v. MOORE

No. 236 PC.

No. 122 (Fall Term).

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 588.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 25 September 1979.
Case 1:07-cv-03556-LTS Document 3 Filed 05/10/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03556-LTS Document 3 Filed 05/10/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03556-LTS Document 3 Filed 05/10/2007 Page 3 of 3
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2
 
 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
      Report of Independent Accountants
       - 33 -




---



##### 



Appendix A
 The DirectorsGracechurch Card Funding (No. 2) PLC1 Churchill PlaceLondonE14 5HPThe DirectorsGracechurch Card Funding (No. 4) PLC1 Churchill PlaceLondonE14 5HPThe DirectorsGracechurch Card Funding (No. 6) PLC1 Churchill PlaceLondonE14 5HPThe DirectorsGracechurch Card Funding (No. 8) PLC1 Churchill PlaceLondonE14 5HPThe DirectorsGracechurch Card Funding (No. 10) PLC1 Churchill PlaceLondonE14 5HPThe DirectorsGracechurch Receivables Trustee Limited26 New StreetSt. HelierJerseyJE2 3RA
 The DirectorsGracechurch Card Funding (No. 3) PLC1 Churchill PlaceLondonE14 5HPThe DirectorsGracechurch Card Funding (No. 5) PLC1 Churchill PlaceLondonE14 5HPThe DirectorsGracechurch Card Funding (No. 7) PLC1 Churchill PlaceLondonE14 5HPThe DirectorsGracechurch Card Funding (No. 9) PLC1 Churchill PlaceLondonE14 5HPThe DirectorsGracechurch Card Funding (No. 11) PLC1 Churchill PlaceLondonE14 5HPThe DirectorsBarclaycard Funding PLC1 Churchill PlaceLondonE14 5HP
   End of Filing
 - 34 -
Law Offices

MITCHELL &

INCANTALUPO

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The Metro Building

98-20 Metropolitan Avenue

Forrest Hills, New York 11375

Tel (718) 997-1000

Fax (718) 575-1600

June 6, 2007

Hon. Jed S. Rakoff

U.S. District Court Judge

500 Pearl Street

New York, NY 10007

Re: Helal Ahmed et al. v. Devi Restaurant, et al.

Case Number 07-CV-3512

Dear Judge Rakoff:

This office has been retained by Devi Restaurant, Ltd., and Rakesh Aggarwal,

the defendants in the above-referenced action. Plaintiffs, who are waiters at the

defendant’srestaurant,allegecausesofactionforunpaidminimumwageandovertime

in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 294 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. and the

comparable New York State provisions, as well as for other alleged employment related

violations.

Defendants respectfully request that the court extend their time to appear and

answer the complaint until June 22, 2007, which I believe is an extension of

approximatelyoneweek.TusharSheth,oneofplaintiffs’attorneys,hasconsentedto

this request.

This is the first request for such as extension of time.

Thank you for your consideration.

Very truly yours,

MITCHELL & INCANTALUPO

By: /S/

Arthur H. Forman

AHF/td

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 3 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

BARTHOLOMEW JONES,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv76-RH/WCS

WARDEN: MRS. IUBRE et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER FOR TRANSFER

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation (document 4). No objections have been filed. Upon

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle

District of Georgia, Macon Division. The clerk must take all steps necessary to

effect the transfer.

SO ORDERED on April 2, 2010.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 3 of 3