alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1728 

To require the United States Postal Service to sell the Alzheimer’s semipostal 

stamp for 6 additional years. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2019 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mrs. CAPITO, Ms. COLLINS, and Mr. VAN HOLLEN) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the United States Postal Service to sell the 

Alzheimer’s semipostal stamp for 6 additional years. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ALZHEIMER’S SEMIPOSTAL STAMP. 

4 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

5 (1) the term ‘‘Alzheimer’s semipostal stamp’’ 

6 means the Alzheimer’s semipostal stamp that the 

7 Postal Service began offering for sale on November 

8 30, 2017, under the discretionary authority under 

9 section 416(b) of title 39, United States Code; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1728 IS

1 (2) the term ‘‘Postal Service’’ means the United 

2 States Postal Service; and 

3 (3) the term ‘‘semipostal stamp’’ has the mean4 ing given the term ‘‘semipostal’’ in section 416(a)(1) 

5 of title 39, United States Code. 

6 (b) CONTINUED SALE.—In order to afford a conven7 ient way for members of the public to contribute to fund8 ing for medical research relating to Alzheimer’s disease, 

9 the Postal Service shall continue to sell the Alzheimer’s 

10 semipostal stamp for a 6-year period beginning on the 

11 date on which the Postal Service, but for the enactment 

12 of this Act, would have discontinued sales of the Alz13 heimer’s semipostal stamp. 

14 (c) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.— 

15 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in this 

16 subsection, the sale of the Alzheimer’s semipostal 

17 stamp during the period described in subsection (b) 

18 shall be governed by section 416 of title 39, United 

19 States Code, and regulations issued under that sec20 tion. 

21 (2) DISPOSITION OF PROCEEDS.—All amounts 

22 becoming available from the sale of the Alzheimer’s 

23 semipostal stamp (as determined under section 

24 416(d) of title 39, United States Code) during the 

25 period described in subsection (b) of this section 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1728 IS

1 shall be transferred to the National Institutes of 

2 Health, for the purpose described in that subsection, 

3 through payments which shall be made not less fre4 quently than 2 times a year. 

5 (3) LEGAL AUTHORITY AND EFFECT.—During 

6 the period described in subsection (b), the Alz7 heimer’s semipostal stamp shall be considered to be 

8 issued under this section and not under subsection 

9 (b) of section 416 of title 39, United States Code, 

10 including for purposes of any limitation under that 

11 section (including any regulation prescribed under 

12 subsection (e)(1)(C) of that section) relating to 

13 whether more than 1 semipostal stamp may be of14 fered for sale at the same time. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
State of New York ) 

 ss.: 

County of New York) 

 PRESTON A. LESCHINS, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 

 I am one of the defendants in the within action. I have read the foregoing 

Answer and know the contents thereof; and the same are true to my own knowledge, except 

as to those matters therein stated to be alleged upon information and belief, and as to those 

matters, I believe them to be true. 

 /s/ Preston A. Leschins 

PRESTON A. LESCHINS 

Sworn to before me this 

5th day of July, 2007 

 /s/ Elise G. Liebowitz 

 NOTARY PUBLIC 

 ELISE G. LIEBOWITZ 

Notary Public, State of New York 

 No. 02L14832276 

 Qualified in Queens County 

Commission Expires March 30, 2011 

Case 1:07-cv-03384-JCF Document 9-2 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. SMITH

No. 2 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 671.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 11 January 1978. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 11 January 1978.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

ISRAEL WASHINGTON, AKA Puck,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 21

- 10017

D.C. No. 2:13

- cr

- 00206

- MCE

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021 * *

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Israel Washington appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion

for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i)

. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291

. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, see United

States v. Keller

, 2 F.4th 1278, 1281 (9th Cir. 2021)

, we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 18 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 10017

Washington contends that the district court erred by relying on U.S.S.G.

§ 1B1.13 as an applicable policy statement in contravention of our holdi ng in

United States v. Aruda , 993 F.3d 797, 802 (9th Cir. 2021) . Though the record

supports this claim, any error was harmless because the court concluded that

—

regardless of whether Washington had demonstrated extraordinary and compelling

reasons for release

— it would deny Washington’s motion under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a)

. See Keller

, 2 F.4th at 1284 (a district court may deny compassionate

release based on the § 3553(a) factors alone )

.

Washington argues that the district court’s § 3553(a) analysis i s insufficient

to support the denial of relief because it was “cursory” and did not reflect that the

court actually weighed the sentencing factors. However, the district court

explained that it agreed with the government’s § 3553(a) analysis, and the record

as a whole makes clear why the court believed the § 3553(a) factors did not

support relief

. See United States v. Carty , 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en

banc). The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Washington’s

motion

. See United States v. Robertson , 895 F.3d 1206, 1213 (9th Cir. 2018)

(district court abuses its discretion only if its decision is illogical, implausible, or

not supported by the record).

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, William A. Shumaker, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: September 12, 2005 

 

/s/ William A. Shumaker

William A. Shumaker

President and Chief Executive Officer
Case 1:05-cv-05251-MBM Document 6 Filed 11/02/2005 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:05-cv-05251-MBM Document 6 Filed 11/02/2005 Page 2 of 2
The Football Association Premier League Limited et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al Doc. 135

Dockets.Justia.com
LOUIS GURIDI

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3977

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 1, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Franklin County

. Jackie L. Fulford , Judge

.

Louis Guridi, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kristen Bonjour, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS

, C.J., MARSTILLER

, and OSTERHAUS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
#### STATE v. CRAFT

No. 82 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 357.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 May 1977.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the First Quarter Report of The First Years, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John R.
Beals, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: May 15, 2003              By: /S/ JOHN R. BEALS
                                    John R. Beals, Treasurer and Senior Vice
                                    President - Finance (Chief Financial Officer
                                    and Chief Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The First Years Inc. and will be retained by The First Years Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Josephine Surleti, as Administratrix of the Estate of Pasquale Surleti, Deceased, Plaintiff, v Anthony G. Stigliano et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Nassau County,

December 31, 1986

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Furey & Furey*for Winthrop University Hospital, defendant. *Mooney, Perry & Hirschhom, P. C.,*for Paul Twist and others, defendants. *Michael T. Wolin, P. C.,*for plaintiff.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stanley Harwood, J.

Motion by defendant Winthrop University Hospital (Hospital) and the cross motion by defendants Twist, Greensher and Coryllos for orders "rejecting” plaintiff’s notice of medical malpractice action pursuant to CPLR 3406 are denied.

It is true that CPLR 3406 requires that a plaintiff in a dental or medical malpractice action file the requisite notice *457"[n]ot more than sixty days after issue is joined”; that rule also provides that the time for filing of the notice "may be extended by the court only upon a motion made” pursuant to CPLR 2004, i.e., "upon such terms as may be just and upon good cause shown, whether the application * * * is made before or after the expiration of the time fixed”. Although no date of filing is specified, plaintiff asserts without contradiction that she served the notice on July 16, 1986, just 69 days *(see,*CPLR 2103 [b] [2]) after defendant Hospital served its answer and 72 days (CPLR 2103 [b] [2]) after defendants Twist, Greensher and Coryllos served theirs. These defendants immediately, and apparently without appreciation of the applicable administrative rule, made these motions, thus engendering delay that recent legislative enactments were presumably designed to avoid. *(See,*L 1985, ch 294.)

Uniform Rules for the New York State Trial Courts (22 NYCRR) § 202.56 (a) provides that the notice of medical or dental malpractice shall be filed within "sixty days of joinder of issue by *all defendants”*(emphasis added). And inasmuch as it appears that defendant Stigliano, who does not appear on these motions, did not serve his answer, by mail, until May 16, 1986, there is no need for a motion pursuant to CPLR 2004, and there is no basis for the motions made by the other defendants.

Counsel for all parties are directed to report to my courtroom on Wednesday, January 28, 1987, at 3:00 p.m. for preliminary conference. If court is then in session, counsel shall report to the officer at the fourth floor information desk.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 57592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4982]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel, Review of K05 applications.
    Date: November 12, 2007.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Beata Buzas, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 
National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm 3041, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-0800, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#492b2b3c33283a092428202567272021672e263f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e58787909f8496a588848c89cb8b8c8dcb828a93">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 3, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-4982 Filed 10-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen A. Stamp, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                                     
|------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 9, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen A. Stamp                                                                
|                   |  |  |  | Stephen A. Stamp
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as our exhibit to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and shall not be deemed to be considered filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Case 1:07-cv-03492-RJS Document 7 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03492-RJS Document 7 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-29-1998
<CASH>                                             298
<SECURITIES>                                       258
<RECEIVABLES>                                      420
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,808
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,037
<PP&E>                                           8,303
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,652
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,825
<BONDS>                                          1,636
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              983
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           493
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,128
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,126
<SALES>                                          8,116
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,116
<CGS>                                            6,336
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  70
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    118
<INCOME-TAX>                                        38
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 80
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        80
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
 Form 10-Q/A
 (Amendment No. 1)
  þ
    
    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from to
 Commission file number 000-04065
 
 Lancaster Colony Corporation
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Ohio
    
    13-1955943(State or other jurisdiction of
    
    (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)incorporation or organization)
 37 West Broad StreetColumbus, Ohio
    
    43215(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 614-224-7141  (Registrants telephone number, including area code)
 þ o
  Large accelerated filer þ
    
    Accelerated filer o
    
    Non-accelerated filer o
    
    Smaller reporting company o(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 o þ




---



##### 



EXPLANATORY NOTE
   
 PART II  OTHER INFORMATION
 
 Item 5. Other Information
   
 Item 6. Exhibits




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  Lancaster Colony Corporation(Registrant)Date: August 28, 2008
    By:
    /s/ John L. BoylanJohn L. BoylanTreasurer, Vice President,
Assistant Secretary,
Chief Financial Officer
and Director
(Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer)




---



##### 



LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q/A
MARCH 31, 2008
 INDEX TO EXHIBITS
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description
    
    Located at10.1*
    
    Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for employees and
consultants under the Lancaster Colony Corporation 2005 Stock Plan
    
    Filed herewith10.2*
    
    Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Award Agreement for employees and
consultants under the Lancaster Colony Corporation 2005 Stock Plan
    
    Filed herewith31.1
    
    Certification of CEO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    
    Filed herewith31.2
    
    Certification of CFO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    
    Filed herewith32
    
    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    
    (a)
 
 *
    
    Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement in which any
Director or any Executive Officer participates.(a)
    
    Indicates the exhibit is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 32 to Lancaster Colony
Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (000-04065) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008.