72294 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 231 / Friday, December 2, 2005 / Notices 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: November 28, 2005. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 05–23563 Filed 12–1–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–552–801 

Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results of the First Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 2, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Irene Gorelik or Javier Barrientos, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 9, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–6905 and (202) 

482–2243, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 13, 2005, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published its notice of 

preliminary results for certain frozen 

fish fillets from the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam. See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets 

from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Preliminary Results and Preliminary 

Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 70 FR 54007 

(September 13, 2005). From October 10, 

2005, through October 14, 2005, the 

Department conducted a verification of 

questionnaire responses, sales, and cost 

data of Vinh Hoan Co., Ltd. (‘‘Vinh 

Hoan’’) and Can Tho Agricultural and 

Animal Products Import Export 

Company (‘‘CATACO’’). The verification 

report for CATACO was issued on 

November 1, 2005. The verification 

report for Vinh Hoan was issued on 

November 14, 2005. The final results are 

currently due on January 11, 2006. 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’), the Department shall issue final 

results in an administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order 120 days after 

the date on which the preliminary 

results are published. The Act further 

provides, however, that the Department 

may extend that 120-day period to 180 

days if it determines it is not practicable 

to complete the review within the 

foregoing time period. The Department 

finds that it is not practicable to 

complete the final results in the 

administrative review of certain frozen 

fish fillets from Vietnam within this 

time limit. Specifically, the Department 

needs additional time to consider the 

verification results and the resulting 

changes to the margin calculations. 

Additionally, the Department is 

extending the deadline for the final 

results to accommodate parties’ public 

hearing request so parties may address 

all issues. Accordingly, the Department 

finds that additional time is required to 

complete these final results. 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 

section 351.213(h)(2) of the 

Department’s regulations allow the 

Department to extend the deadline for 

the final results to a maximum of 180 

days from the publication date of the 

preliminary results. For the reasons 

noted above, we are extending the time 

for the completion of the final results of 

this review by 60 days, until no later 

than March 13, 2006. This notice is 

published in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and section 

351.213(h)(2) of the Department’s 

regulations. 

Dated: November 29, 2005. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 05–23564 Filed 12–1–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(A–357–812) 

Honey from Argentina: Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On February 4, 2005, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the initiation of 

a new shipper review of the 

antidumping duty order on honey from 

Argentina covering the period December 

1, 2003, to December 31, 2004. See 

Honey From Argentina: Initiation of 

New Shipper Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, (New Shipper 

Initiation), 70 FR 5965 (February 4, 

2005). This review covers one exporter, 

El Mana S.A. (El Mana) of Argentina. 

For the reasons discussed below and in 

an our accompanying Rescission 

Memorandum, we are rescinding this 

new shipper review in its entirety. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 2, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Cordell or Robert James, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482- 0408 and (202) 

482–0469, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is honey from Argentina. The products 

covered are natural honey, artificial 

honey containing more than 50 percent 

natural honey by weight, preparations of 

natural honey containing more than 50 

percent natural honey by weight, and 

flavored honey. The subject 

merchandise includes all grades and 

colors of honey whether in liquid, 

creamed, comb, cut comb, or chunk 

form, and whether packaged for retail or 

in bulk form. The merchandise is 

currently classifiable under subheadings 

0409.00.00, 1702.90.90, and 2106.90.99 

of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

the United States (HTSUS). Although 

the HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes, 

the Department’s written description of 

the merchandise subject to this order is 

dispositive. 

Background 

On December 30, 2004, the 

Department received a letter from El 

Mana, an exporter, requesting that the 

Department conduct a new shipper 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on honey from Argentina. On January 

31, 2005, the Department initiated this 

antidumping new shipper review 

covering the period December 1, 2003, 

to December 31, 2004. See Honey From 

Argentina: Initiation of New Shipper 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 70 FR 5965 (February 4, 2005). 

On February 8, 2005, the Department 

issued sections A–C of the Department’s 

antidumping questionnaire to El Mana. 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 231 / Friday, December 2, 2005 / Notices 72295 

El Mana responded to the Department’s 

questionnaires on March 3 and March 4, 

2005 (section A), and March 21, 2005 

(sections B and C) (QR). On February 8, 

2005, the Department issued a 

questionnaire to the importer of record 

for the U.S. sale at issue. The importer 

responded on March 21, 2005. 

On April 26, 2005, the Department 

issued its first supplemental 

questionnaire to El Mana. El Mana 

responded on May 19, 2005. The 

Department issued a second 

supplemental questionnaire to El Mana 

on May 24, 2005, to which El Mana 

responded on May 31, 2005. The 

Department then requested additional 

information on June 20, 2005, to which 

El Mana filed its response on July 5, 

2005. Petitioners submitted comments 

to the supplemental questionnaire 

responses (SQR) on July 8, 2005. On 

July 25, 2005, the Department issued a 

final supplemental questionnaire, to 

which El Mana responded on August 

12, 2005. 

On June 23, 2005, the Department 

published a notice of extension of the 

time limit for the completion of the 

preliminary results until November 28, 

2005. See 70 FR 36374. 

On September 26, the Department 

issued a memorandum ‘‘New Shipper 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 

on Honey from Argentina: Intent to 

Rescind the Review with Respect to El 

Mana. ‘‘ On October 6, 2005, both 

petitioners (the American Honey 

Producers Association and the Sioux 

Honey Association) and the respondent 

El Mana provided comments to our 

stated intent to rescind. On October 11, 

2005, both petitioners and respondent 

issued rebuttal comments. On October 

14, 2005, petitioners provided 

additional comments concerning new 

information in respondent’s rebuttal 

comments. On November 10, 2005, the 

Department rejected El Mana’s rebuttal 

comments dated October 11, 2005, and 

asked El Mana to resubmit the rebuttal 

comments without reference to the new 

information included in the October 11, 

2005, submission. At the same time, the 

Department rejected petitioners 

additional comments, dated October 14, 

2005, as they included references to the 

new information referenced by El Mana 

in its October 11, 2005, submission. El 

Mana refiled its rebuttal comments on 

November 15, 2005, and these were also 

rejected for the same reasons. 

Subsequently, El Mana refiled the 

comments on November 16, 2005. 

Analysis of New Shipper Review 

On September 26, 2005, the 

Department issued a memorandum 

detailing our intent to rescind this 

review because we preliminarily 

determined the cooperative that 

supplied El Mana with the subject 

merchandise knew, or should have 

known, that the final destination of the 

subject merchandise was the United 

States. See Memorandum to Barbara E. 

Tillman, entitled ‘‘New Shipper Review 

of the Antidumping Duty Order on 

Honey from Argentina: Intent to Rescind 

the Review with Respect to El Mana,’’

dated August September 26, 2005 

(Intent to Rescind Memorandum). 

The Department preliminarily 

determined the cooperative had in its 

possession at the time of sale of the 

subject merchandise to El Mana, labels 

indicating the final destination of the 

subject merchandise as the United 

States. The totality of the facts on the 

record led the Department to conclude 

that the cooperative had or should have 

had knowledge that the merchandise 

was destined for the United States. The 

Department stated that because there 

was no request for a review of the 

cooperative’s sale to El Mana and 

because El Mana made no other sales 

during the POR, the Department 

intended to rescind the current new 

shipper review of El Mana. 

Rescission of New Shipper Review 

For the reasons stated in the 

accompanying Rescission Memorandum 

and as outlined above, and pursuant to 

section 751(a)(2)(B) and 19 CFR 

351.214(f), we are rescinding this new 

shipper review. Parties can find a 

complete discussion of the issues raised 

in this new shipper review and the 

corresponding recommendations in this 

memorandum, which is on file in the 

Central Records Unit, room B–099 of the 

main Commerce Building. Since the 

Department is rescinding the new 

shipper review, we are not calculating a 

company–specific rate for El Mana. 

Notification 

The Department will notify U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

that bonding is no longer permitted to 

fulfill security requirements for 

shipments of Argentine honey by El 

Mana entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption in the 

United States on or after the publication 

of this rescission notice in the Federal 

Register, and that a cash deposit of 

30.24 percent ad valorem should be 

collected for any entries exported by El 

Mana. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

determination and notice in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i) of 

the Act. 

Dated: November 28, 2005. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix – Rescission Memorandum 

1. Cooperative’s knowledge of the 

destination of the merchandise at the 

time of sale. 

2. Date of sale of subject merchandise by 

El Mana to the U.S. customer. 

3. El Mana as a trading company or 

reseller 

4. Other Issues raised by petitioner 

[FR Doc. 05–23561 Filed 12–1–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–570–875 

Extension of Time Limit for the 

Preliminary Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review: Non–Malleable Cast Iron Pipe 

Fittings from the People’s Republic of 

China 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 2, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Holton or Will Dickerson, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 8, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1324, or 482–1778, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 1, 2005, the Department 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice for an opportunity to request an 

administrative review of non–malleable 

cast iron pipe fittings from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity to Request 

Administrative Review, 70 FR 16799 

(April 1, 2005). As a result of a request 

for a review filed by Myland Industrial 

Co., Ltd. and Buxin Myland (Foundry) 

Ltd. (collectively ‘‘Myland’’) on April 

25, 2005, the Department published in 

the Federal Register a notice of the 

initiation of the antidumping duty 

administrative review of non–malleable 

cast iron pipe fittings from the PRC for 

the period April 1, 2004, through March 

31, 2005. See Initiation of Antidumping