alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 52011PC0716 - EN

*|*

# 52011PC0716

**Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on a European Union position concerning the decision by the WTO General Council on the extension of the WTO waiver in order to implement the EU autonomous trade preferential regime for the Western Balkans /* COM/2011/0716 final - 2011/0316 (NLE) */ **

*

*

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

In 2010 t he European Union (EU) launched the process of renewing the autonomous preferential regime for the Western Balkans until 31 December 2015. The legislative procedure necessary for the adoption of the renewal of the regime has now been completed..

To permit the EU to provide preferential treatment for the application of autonomous preferential regime to the Western Balkans, without being required to extend the same preferential treatment to the like products of any other Member of the WTO, the EU needs to present a request for the extension of the waiver from the provisions GATT 1994 Article I:1 until 31 December 2016.

1. 2011/0316 (NLE)

Proposal for a

COUNCIL DECISION

on a European Union position concerning the decision by the WTO General Council on the extension of the WTO waiver in order to implement the EU autonomous trade preferential regime for the Western Balkans

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207(4), first subpragraph, in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

2. The European Union has adopted legislation renewing the autonomous preferential regime for the Western Balkans until 31 December 2015. In the absence of a waiver from the European Union's obligations under paragraph 1 of Article I of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT 1994) the treatment provided for in the autonomous preferential regime would need to be extended to all other WTO Members. It is therefore appropriate to seek a waiver of Article I.1 GATT 1994 pursuant to Article IX:3 of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organisation (WTO Agreement)

3. The European Union submitted such a request on 26 October 2011.

4. The General Council of the World Trade Organisation will deliberate on this request.

5. It is appropriate, therefore, that the position of the European Union in the deliberations of the WTO General Council is to favour adoption of the request,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The position of the European Union in the General Council of the World Trade Organisation is to approve the extension of the WTO waiver for the Western Balkans until 31 December 2016. This position shall be expressed by the Commission.

Article 2

This decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at [...],

For the Council

The President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ENSTAR
GROUP, INC.'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS REPORT ON FORM
10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          63,713
<SECURITIES>                                     3,595
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             110
<DEPRECIATION>                                      73
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               91
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,014
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,776
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,540
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,956
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,575
<INCOME-TAX>                                        84
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,491
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,491
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. SAMPSON

No. 84 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 305.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 24 January 1978.
#### HALL v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP.

No. 113 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 202.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 December 1975.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ARTHUR ALAN WOLK, PHILIP BROWNDIES, AND CATHERINE MARCHAND,

Respondents

v.

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LOWER MERION,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 152 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of October, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Case 1:07-cv-03548-LAK Document 5-2 Filed 05/10/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03548-LAK Document 5-2 Filed 05/10/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03548-LAK Document 5-2 Filed 05/10/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:10-cr-00003-SPM-AK Document 1 Filed 01/19/10 Page 1 of 4Case 1:10-cr-00003-SPM-AK Document 1 Filed 01/19/10 Page 2 of 4Case 1:10-cr-00003-SPM-AK Document 1 Filed 01/19/10 Page 3 of 4Case 1:10-cr-00003-SPM-AK Document 1 Filed 01/19/10 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cr-00257-SAS Document 11 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Lannett Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Arthur P. Bedrosian,the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Keith R. Ruck,the Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                        The Report complies with the requirementsof Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                        The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: May 13,  2010 | /s/Arthur P. Bedrosian |
|---------------------------|------------------------|
|                      |                   |
|                      |                   | Arthur P. Bedrosian, |
|                      |                   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|                      |                   |
|                      |                   |
| Dated: May 13,  2010 | /s/Keith R. Ruck       |
|                      |                   |
|                      |                   | Keith R. Ruck, |
|                      |                   | Vice President of  Finance and Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Alzheimer Pathogenesis.                    

*Date:*                         October 24, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20814 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         William Cruce, PhD, Health Scientist Administrator, Scientific Review Office, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Room 2C212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-402-7704,                         *crucew@nia.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 58672)    
Dated: October 5, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5086 Filed 10-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2103 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2103

                To improve access to affordable insulin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 2019

  Mr. Durbin (for himself, Mr. Cramer, and Ms. Smith) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                To improve access to affordable insulin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Affordable Insulin Approvals Now 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEEMED APPROVAL UNDER SECTION 351.

    Section 7002(e)(4) of the Biologics Price Competition and 
Innovation Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-148) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``An amended'' and inserting the following:
                    ``(A) In general.--An amended''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Treatment of certain pending applications.--
                With respect to an application for an insulin 
                biological product submitted under subsection (b)(2) or 
                (j) of section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
                Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355) with a filing date that is 
                not later than December 31, 2019, until the Secretary 
                makes a determination on final approval with respect to 
                such application, the Secretary shall continue to 
                review and approve (as appropriate) such application 
                under such section 505, even if such review and 
                approval process continues after March 23, 2020. For 
                purposes of completing the review and approval process 
                for such an application, any listed drug referenced in 
                the application shall be treated as a listed drug under 
                section 505(j)(7) of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
                Cosmetic Act, even if such listed drug is deemed 
                licensed under section 351 of the Public Health Service 
                Act during such review and approval process. Effective 
                on the later of March 23, 2020, or the date of approval 
                under subsection (c) or (j) of section 505 of the 
                Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of any such 
                application, such approved application shall be deemed 
                to be a license for the biological product under 
                section 351 of the Public Health Service Act.''.
                                 <all>
```
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2128 

To exempt for an additional 4-year period, from the application of the meanstest presumption of abuse under chapter 7 of title 11, United States 

Code, qualifying members of reserve components of the Armed Forces 

and members of the National Guard who, after September 11, 2001, 

are called to active duty or to perform a homeland defense activity 

for not less than 90 days. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 16, 2019 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. TILLIS, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. 

CORNYN, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. 

ERNST, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To exempt for an additional 4-year period, from the application of the means-test presumption of abuse under chapter 7 of title 11, United States Code, qualifying members 

of reserve components of the Armed Forces and members 

of the National Guard who, after September 11, 2001, 

are called to active duty or to perform a homeland defense activity for not less than 90 days. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2128 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Guard and 

3 Reservists Debt Relief Extension Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVISTS DEBT RELIEF 

5 AMENDMENT. 

6 Section 4(b) of the National Guard and Reservists 

7 Debt Relief Act of 2008 (11 U.S.C. 707 note; Public Law 

8 110–438) is amended by striking ‘‘11-year’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘15-year’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### STATE v. MAHER

No. 144 PC.

Now No. 11 PA 82.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 639.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 12 January 1982. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 12 January 1982.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 30, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71789-71790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23356]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 05-2942; MB Docket No. 05-188; RM-11240]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Bass River Township and Ocean City, 
NJ

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In response to a Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 70 FR 31409 
(June 1, 2005), this Report and Order substitutes Channel 293A for 
Channel 292A, Station WKOE(FM), Ocean City, New Jersey; reallots 
Channel 293A, from Ocean City to Bass River Township; and modifies 
Station WKOE's license accordingly. The coordinates for Channel 293A at 
Bass River Township, New Jersey, are 39-39-00 NL and 74-21-20 WL, with 
a site restriction of 10.4 kilometers (6.4 miles) northeast of Bass 
River Township.

DATES: Effective December 27, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R. Barthen Gorman, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MB Docket No. 05-188, adopted November 9, 2005, and 
released November 10, 2005. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC's Reference Information Center at Portals II, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The document may also be 
purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor,

[[Page 71790]]

Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room 
CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or http://www.BCPIWEB.com. The Commission will send a copy of this Report and 
Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government 
Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 
U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio, Radio broadcasting.

0
Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as 
follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

0
1. The authority citation for part 73 reads as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec.  73.202  [Amended]

0
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under New Jersey, is 
amended by removing Channel 292A at Ocean City, and adding Bass River 
Township, Channel 293A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 05-23356 Filed 11-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### ROSA ELLA D. WHITTINGTON, Employee, Plaintiff, v. A. J. SCHNIERSON & SONS, INC., Employer, and EMPLOYERS MUTUAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF WISCONSIN, Carrier, Defendants.

(Filed 22 November, 1961.)

Master and Servant § 60—

An injury sustained by an employee while going to or from work does not arise in the course of his employment and is not compensable when the employer is not under contractual duty to transport employee -to or from work or furnish the means of transportation as an incident of the contract of employment.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Bone, J.,*May 29,1961, Term of RaNdolph.

Plaintiff filed claim with the Industrial Commission for an award of compensation for injury by accident, which she alleges arose out of and in the course of her employment by A. J. Schnierson & Sons, Inc.

Plaintiff was an employee of Schnierson. She worked from 7:00 A.M. to 3:35 P.M. On 11 December 1958 it began to snow and the “floor boss” came around and told plaintiff and other employees to go home before the weather got so bad they would be unable to get home. Plaintiff left the plant about 12:00 noon. At this hour she had no means of conveyance to her home — she customarily rode with others who worked elsewhere in town. Her employer (Schnierson) provided no transportation for its employees either to or from work and had not contracted to provide transportation for them; each employee pro*725vided his or her own transportation. On the day in question plaintiff arranged to ride home in the car of a fellow employee. Because of the condition of the road to plaintiff’s home they took another route. Plaintiff got out of the car about 1/2 mile from her home with the intention of walking the remaining distance. As she got out of the car her feet slipped and she fell. As a result of the fall her hip was broken. She was hospitalized and has not been able to work since the accident.

The Hearing Commissioner concluded that the injury did not arise in the course of plaintiff’s employment and denied compensation. Upon appeal to the Full Commission the opinion and award of the Hearing Commissioner was affirmed. Plaintiff appealed to Superior Court and that court affirmed the opinion and award of the Full Commission.

Plaintiff appealed to Supreme Court and assigned errors.

*Ottway Burton and Linwood T. Peoples for plaintiff.*

*Walser & Brinkley and Charles H. McGirt for defendants.*

Peb CüRiam.

It has been repeatedly declared by this Court that an injury sustained by an employee while going to or from work does not arise in the course of his employment and is not compensable unless the employer is under a contractual duty to transport employee or furnishes the means of transportation as an incident of the contract of employment. *Smith v. Gastonia,*216 N.C. 517, 5 S.E. 2d 540; *Lassiter v. Telephone Co.,*215 N.C. 227, 1 S.E. 2d 542; *Dependents of Phifer v. Dairy,*200 N.C. 65, 156 S.E. 147.

The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

Consent of Independent Auditors 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-50232 and Form S-8 No. 333-82448) of our report dated February 13, 2004 withrespect to the consolidated financial statements of William Lyon Homes and our report dated February 15, 2002 with respect to the combined financial statements of the Significant Subsidiaries of William Lyon Homes, both of which are included in thisAnnual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Irvine, California 

March 8, 2004
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 14 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 14 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 2 of 2