alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.3

     

    AMENDMENT

    TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

    

    

    THIS AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) is entered into as of the 26th day of March, 2020 (the “Effective Date”) by and between U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. (the “Company”)

      and Glenn McDowell (“Executive”), for the purpose of amending that certain Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Executive, dated as of May 21, 2019 (the “Employment Agreement”). The parties hereby
      agree that the Employment Agreement is hereby modified as provided herein.

     

    
      
        	

              	5.	
                Effective as of the Effective Date, Section 4 of the Employment Agreement is amended to reduce Executive’s annualized salary by thirty five percent (35%) to an annualized salary of $331,500.00 per annum,
                  payable in accordance with the Company’s standard payroll practices and subject to ordinary course withholdings.

              


      

    

     

    
      
        	

              	6.	
                Except as provided herein, the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement remain intact and the Company and Employee hereby ratify such terms and conditions.

              


      

    

     

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties agree to the terms and conditions of this Amendment, both as to form and substance, and the parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and
      year first written above:

    
      

      

      	 	
              COMPANY:

            
	 	   
	 	U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc.  
	 	 
	 	
              By:

            	
              /s/ Richard Binstein

            
	 	 	
              Richard Binstein

              Vice President and General Counsel

            


      

      

      	 	
              EXECUTIVE:

            
	 	   
	 	
              By:

            	
              
                /s/ Glenn McDowell

              

            
	 	 	
              
                Glenn McDowell
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-10-00290-CR

IN RE LUTHER GABRIEL

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Luther Gabriel seeks a writ of mandamus compelling Respondent, the Honorable 

Deborah Oakes Evans, Judge of the 87th District Court of Freestone County, to rule on 

his motion for post-conviction DNA testing. The State has filed a response 

demonstrating that Respondent has ruled on Gabriel’s motion.

1 Therefore, the petition 

for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot. See In re Luna, 317 S.W.3d 484, 484 (Tex. 

App.—Amarillo 2010, orig. proceeding); In re Medrano, No. 13-10-00122-CR, 2010 Tex. 

App. LEXIS 1988, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Mar. 16, 2010, orig. proceeding) 

(per curiam) (not designated for publication).

 

1 The State attached a certified copy of the docket sheet in the underlying cause to its response 

which reflects that Respondent denied Gabriel’s motion for post-conviction DNA testing on October 4, 

2010 because “1) No evidence exists to be subjected to DNA [testing], and 2) There was never any 

biological evidence collected that still exists or ever existed that could be tested for DNA.”
In re Gabriel Page 2

FELIPE REYNA

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Petition dismissed as moot

Opinion delivered and filed October 20, 2010

Do not publish

[OT06]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of Prime
Rate Income and Dividend Enterprises, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the annual
report of the company on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2003, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the company's financial condition and
results of operations.


October 14, 2003


/s/ Peter G. Futro
---------------------------------------
Peter G. Futro, Chief Executive Officer
#### TAYLOR v. TRIANGLE PORSCHE-AUDI, INC.

No. 37 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 711.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 April 1976.
#### MORGAN, ATTY. GENERAL v. POWER CO.

No. 63.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 497.

Petition of Attorney General for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 24 September 1974¿ 'Motions of Utilities Comm, and Power Co. to dismiss appeal allowed 24 September 1974.

Justice Lake

dissenting: It is my view that the appeal of the Attorney General in this case presents a substantial question of law, neither heretofore nor now determined by this Coúrt, as to the authority of the Utilities Commission to grant, without a hearing, an interim increase in rates charged by a public utility for its service, that the public interest requires a prompt determination of this question and that to continue the increased rates in effect pending further consideration thereof by the Utilities Commission subjects the users of the service .to .the risk of substantial legal and economic injury. For these reasons, it is my view that the appeal should now be heard by this . Court and should not be summarily dismissed as premature.
ex_178328.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 


GENPREX, INC.


 


Amendment No. 1 to Stock Option Agreement


 


This Amendment No. 1 to Stock Option Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made as of March 18, 2020 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Genprex, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and David Friedman (the “Optionee”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the respective meanings assigned to them in the Company’s 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and the Option Agreement (as defined below) with respect to the Option (as defined below), each of which is made a part of this document.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, on December 30, 2019, the Company granted to Optionee an option to purchase 68,376 shares of the Company’s Common Stock under the Plan (the “Option”);


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Optionee have entered into a Notice of Stock Option Grant and Stock Option Agreement (the “Option Agreement”) setting forth the terms and conditions of the Option, including the Vesting Schedule (as set forth in the Option Agreement); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Optionee desire to amend the Vesting Schedule to accelerate the vesting of the Option so that the Option is fully vested on the Effective Date;


 


AGREEMENT


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.     Amendment of Option Agreement. The Vesting Schedule of the Option Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:


 


Vesting Schedule:


 


This Option will be exercisable to the extent vested on the following schedule:


 


One hundred percent (100%) of the Shares subject to the Option shall vest upon the date of grant of the Option.


 


2.     Miscellaneous. Any amendment, change, modification or termination of this Amendment may be made only in an express written contract executed by the Optionee and a duly authorized officer of the Company. Except as set forth herein, the Option Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Amendment is governed by the internal substantive laws but not the choice of law rules of the State of Delaware.


 


	
			GENPREX, INC.


			 


			By:


			      Rodney Varner, CEO

				
			OPTIONEE


			 


			 


			David Friedman
#### SHIELDS v. INSURANCE CO.

No. 135 PC.

Case below: 50 N.C. App. 355.

Petition by plaintiff for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 June 1981.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6686

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RYAN O’NEIL LITTLE, a/k/a LA, a/k/a Youngblood,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:95-cr-00105-MOC-1)

Submitted: January 20, 2022 Decided: January 24, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ryan O’Neil Little, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6686 Doc: 21 Filed: 01/24/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Ryan O’Neil Little appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and find that the district court did 

not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (stating 

standard of review), cert. denied, 142 S.Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s order. We deny Little’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6686 Doc: 21 Filed: 01/24/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
#### Allen, Preer *&*Ilges, plaintiffs in error, *vs.*Charles M. Smith, defendant in error.

(By two judges.) — Where S. furnished land and the necessary means to make a crop to a freedman, under a contract that the crop was to be the property of S. until his advances were returned, for which purpose he was to sell the crop, and return any surplus to the freedman, and the cotton made was carried to the gin house of S., there ginned and packed and left for several days, this constituted sufficient possession in S. to enable him to sue out a possessory warrant for the cotton, which had afterwards been secretly carried off by the negro and sold. 5th March, 1872.

Possessory Warrant. Before Judge Johnson. Muscogee Superior Court. May Term, 1871.

The facts are in the opinion.

Peabody *&*Brannon, for plaintiffs in error.

The judgment of a Justice of the Peace in possessory warrant revers-able, though some evidence to sustain it: 37 Ga. R., 580. The contract and possession was only for security, and gave no title: 43 Ga. R., 262. Such possession not good basis for possessory warrant: 40 Ga. R., 329.

Moses & Downing, for defendant.

*85Montgomery, Judge.

The defendant in error made a contract with a freedman, by which he was to furnish land, all necessary horse-power, provisions, etc., which the freedman was to use, in making a crop. The crop was to belong to Smith, until all his advances were paid. He was to sell the crop, pay himself, and give the surplus, if any, to the freedman. The crop was made, (three bales of cotton), gathered, carried to Smith’s gin-house by the freedman, ginned, packed and there left. It was worth less than the advances made by Smith to the freedman. The gin-house was half a mile off from the land on which the cotton was made. The cotton remained several days at the gin-house, when, during Smith’s absence from home, the freedman, without his knowledge or consent, carried it to Columbus, and sold it, and so it came into the possession of the plaintiffs in error. Smith took out a possessory warrant before a magistrate. The magistrate awarded the cotton to him. A *certiorari*was sued out, the judgment of the magistrate affirmed, and the case brought here.

We see no error in the ruling. The crop had been made and delivered according to the contract. Smith had possession at the time. It was unlawfully taken by the freedman.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                 
                       
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         3,031,449
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8,137,879
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    11,722,654
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               23,255,543
<PP&E>                                         7,533,041
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 33,615,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,224,763
<BONDS>                                        2,164,897
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,410
<COMMON>                                       118,762
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   33,615,035
<SALES>                                        40,889,061
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  21,960,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               13,834,321
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             313,952
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,780,249
<INCOME-TAX>                                   90,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,690,249
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,690,249
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.37
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 57518]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4972]



[[Page 57518]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Caribou-Targhee National Forest, Idaho; Smokey Canyon Mine, 
Panels F & G FEIS Update

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION:  Revision of the Revised Notice of Intent to prepare an 
Environmental Impact Statement for the Smoky Canyon Mine Panels F & G 
Project, as published in the Federal Register pages 77118 to 77120 on 
December 29, 2005 (Vol. 70, No. 249). This revision includes a change 
of the project schedule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The USDA, Forest Service, DOI, Bureau of Land Management and 
Idaho Department of Environmental Quality prepared a Draft 
Environmental Impact Statement that documented the analysis and 
disclosed the environmental impacts of the proposed Smoky Canyon Mine, 
Panels F and G Project, a phosphate mine expansion. The DEIS was 
released for comment in December 2005 and a Notice of Availability was 
published in the Federal Register on December 29, 2005.
    This revised Notice of Intent is to document a change in the 
schedule for the release of the FEIS. In the original NOI, dated 
September 15, 2003, the tentative date for release of the FEIS was 
September 2005; in the update to the NOI on December 29, 2005 the FEIS 
was scheduled for release in July, 2006. Due to scheduling changes, the 
release of the FEIS is now scheduled for October 2007.

DATES: A FEIS is expected to be completed by the end of October, 2007.

ADDRESSES: For further information, mail correspondence to Jeff Jones, 
Team Leader, Caribou-Targhee National Forest, 4350 Cliff Drive, 
Pocatello, ID 83204 or telephone (208) 236-7572.

    Dated: October 3, 2007.
Lawrence Timchak,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 07-4972 Filed 10-09-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE DIANA CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE 40
WEEKS ENDED JANUARY 4, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-04-1997
<CASH>                                            2800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     8341
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       3247
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 18313
<PP&E>                                            2317
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (229)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   35743
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5587
<BONDS>                                           1817
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          6007
<OTHER-SE>                                       21925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     35743
<SALES>                                           9224
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  9224
<CGS>                                             2438
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2438
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 10989
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  52
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4355)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       836
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3519)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (6175)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (227)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9921)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.89)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT E 

Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 18-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 18-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 18-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 18-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 18-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 18-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 18-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 18-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 18-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 9 of 9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          188829
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    40920
<ALLOWANCES>                                     19782
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                209967
<PP&E>                                         3490270
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2409386
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1290851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            87212
<BONDS>                                         387269
<COMMON>                                        780573
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       35797
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1290851
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 75783
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    87517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                8492
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (20226)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (20226)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (20226)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 2 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 3 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 4 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 5 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 6 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 7 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 8 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 9 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 10 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 11 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 12 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 13 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 14 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 15 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 16 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 17 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 18 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 19 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 20 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 21 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 22 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 23 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 24 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 25 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 26 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 27 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 28 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 29 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 30 of 31Case 1:07-cv-03587-MGC Document 17-3 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 31 of 31
#### JOHNSON v. LOCKMAN

No. 186 PC.

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 54.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 28 June 1979.