alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PORTAGE BIOTECH INC. AND ALL SUBSIDIARIES




Code of Conduct






Our Company's Board of Directors adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to, among other persons, our Company's Chief Executive Officer  and Chief Financial Officer (being our principal executive officers) and members of our audit committee and any future committees that may be established from time to time, all our key consultants, as well as persons performing similar functions. As adopted, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics sets forth written standards that are designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:






(1) honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;






(2) Full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we file with, or submit to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and in other public communications made by us;






(3) Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;






(4) the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; and






(5) Accountability for adherence to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.






Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requires, among other things, that all of our Company's personnel and consultants shall be accorded full access to our CEO/CFO and members of our audit committee with respect to any matter which may arise relating to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Further, all of our Company's personnel and consultants are to be accorded full access to our Company's board of directors if any such matter involves an alleged breach of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by our CEO or CFO.






In addition, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics emphasizes that all employees, and particularly managers and/or supervisors and our key consultants have a responsibility for maintaining financial integrity within our Company, consistent with generally accepted accounting principles, and federal, provincial and state securities laws. Any employee who becomes aware of any incidents involving financial or accounting manipulation or other irregularities, whether by witnessing the incident or being told of it, must report it to his or her immediate supervisor or to our Company's CEO. If the incident involves an alleged breach of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by the CEO, the incident must be reported to any
member of our Board of Directors. Any failure to report such inappropriate or irregular conduct of others is to be treated as a severe disciplinary matter. It is against our Company policy to retaliate against any individual who reports in good faith the violation or potential violation of our Company's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by another.
Case 1:07-cv-03527-DAB     Document 6      Filed 09/13/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 45 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CAESAR WHITE, JR.,

VS Case No. 3:09cv574/LAC/EMT

SUSAN NELMS, et al.,

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Magistrate Judge Timothy on February 8, 2010 

Type of Motion/Pleading: “Motion for Recusal or Judicial Disqualify [sic] of U.S. District

Judges Lacey A. Collier and U.S. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth M. Timothy” and request to

transfer action “to another judge, division, or U.S. district court system with jurisdiction”

 

Filed by: Plaintiff on 2/8/10 Document 7

( ) Stipulated/Consented/Joint Pleading

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

 /s/ Teresa Milstead 

Deputy Clerk: Teresa Milstead

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 12th day of

February, 2010, that:

The requested relief is DENIED. Plaintiff has failed to allege circumstances under

which a reasonable individual could conclude that the impartiality of the undersigned

or District Judge Collier might reasonably be questioned or that either of the

assigned judges has a personal bias or prejudice concerning Plaintiff.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
#### STATE v. BLACK

No. 180P82.

Case below: 56 N.C. App. 467.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 April 1982.
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -GRJ Document 174 Filed 01/14/11 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -GRJ Document 174 Filed 01/14/11 Page 2 of 2
heat stress

Risk Factors

Workers should be aware of the many factors 

 that can impact the risk of heat illness.

Environment

• High temperatures, especially

with high humidity, which 

makes sweating less effective

• Direct sun exposure

• Lack of wind or breeze to cool the body;

however, when ambient conditions are

higher than body temperature, warm

airflow can actually increase heat gain

• Proximity to engines or other hot equipment

Activities

• High exertion

• Not enough rest breaks

• Repeated strenuous days

in the heat

• High motivation to push through

discomfort from heat strain

Photo by NIOSH

Medications

Heat tolerance can 

be affected by 

medications taken for 

• cold, allergies, and congestion

• muscle spasms

• blood pressure

• urine production (diuretics)

• high blood pressure

• diarrhea

• dizziness/vertigo

• psychosis

• depression

Health 

Conditions

• Short-term illnesses,

such as diarrhea, vomiting, 

or respiratory infections

• Chronic conditions, such as

diabetes and heart disease

• Being overweight or obese

• Poor physical fitness

Other Factors

• Age over 60

• Non-breathable

clothing or personal

protective equipment

• Alcohol use in the

past 24 hours

Prior Heat 

Illness

• Increases the

risk of heat illness 

in the future

Dehydration

• One of the

most important 

risk factors 

No Acclimatization

• New employees

• Experienced employees

returning from time away

from the heat

• Acclimatized workers who experience a

sudden change in worksite temperature,

such as heat waves or mining in a new area

A worker may be affected by many 

risk factors at the same time. Talk 

to a healthcare provider about 

your personal risk factors.

All photos by ©Thinkstock unless otherwise noted. 
heat stress Risk Factors

Points to Remember

• Acclimatization is critical

Lack of acclimatization is a major factor in heat-related deaths on the job

• Hydration is critical

Dehydration greatly increases the risk of heat illness

• A recent illness can temporarily lower your heat tolerance

• Be aware of other personal risk factors for heat illness

Prior heat illness

Certain medications

Certain health conditions

Alcohol use within 24 hours of working in heat

Case showing hazards of heat illness even in acclimatized workers 

A 27-year-old employee with two years’ mining 

experience was coming to the end of a 12-hour shift 

at a mill in Arizona when he experienced muscle 

cramps and vomiting from dehydration. Although 

he did not lose consciousness, he missed two days 

of work due to the incident. The employee had been 

taking medication for high blood pressure.

Lessons Learned

Young, healthy, and experienced—anyone can get 

heat illness! This incident may have been related 

to the employee’s high blood pressure medication. 

Multiple factors together, such as certain medications, 

a recent illness, or repeated strenuous days in the 

heat, can increase the risk for heat illness. Photo by ©Thinkstock

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2017-125
Exhibit 10.5


 





Loans Extension Confirmation Letter


 


Reference is made to
the loans from Ms. Heung Mei Tsui to China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), the principal and accumulated interest
totaled USD1,354,567 and USD111,940.95 respectively as of December 31, 2019. Due to the fact the Company temporarily did not have
enough balance in its oversea account to repay the loans, both Ms. Tsui and the Company agreed to extend the loans to December
31, 2020, by which date the Company shall repay the principal and accumulated interest.


 


	 	Lender: 	/s/ Heung Mei Tsui


 


	 	Borrower:	China Pharma Holdings, Inc.


 


	 	By:	/s/ Zhilin Li, President & CEO
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 11-4 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 11-4 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 11-4 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 11-4 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 11-4 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 11-4 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 11-4 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 11-4 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 8 of 8
#### STATE v. DAVID CANUP.

(Filed 14 October, 1964.)

Criminal Daw §§ 139, 173—

Even though a post-conviction hearing is denied because petition therefor was not filed until more than five years after the trial, the Supreme Court will grant *certiorari*when it appears on the face of the record proper that defendant had been sentenced to imprisonment in excess of the maximum allowed by law for the offense charged, and the Court will vacate the judgment and remand the cause for proper judgment, with credit under such circumstances for time served, including any allowance for good behavior.

ON September 23, 1964, the defendant David Canup applied to this Court for writ of *certiorari*to review an order entered by *Judge Bundy*at the August, 1964 criminal session, New HaNOVek Superior Court, denying a post-conviction review of the defendant’s trial held at the May, 1958 Term, New Hanover Superior Court. At the Post-Conviction Hearing the solicitor moved to dismiss the application for review upon the ground the trial was held at the May Term, 1958 and the application was not filed until August, 1964, more than five years after the trial. Judge Bundy allowed the motion to dismiss for the reason assigned.

The defendant’s petition for *certiorari*and the Attorney General’s answer disclose that the defendant, at the May Term, 1958, entered a plea of *nolo contendere*to a charge of possessing burglary tools. The court imposed a sentence of not less than 15 nor more than 20 years in the State’s prison. The ground assigned for the review here is that the original sentence of 15 to 20 years is in excess, of the"authorized punishment for the offense charged. We grant the writ’.

*T. W. Bruton, Attorney General; Theodore C. Brown, Jr., Staff Attorney for the State. ■■■ ■*

*607
      *No counsel for the 'petitioner.*

PeR Cueiam.

The determinative facts alleged in the petition are admitted in the Attorney General’s answer. They appear upon the face of the record proper. The judgment of imprisonment for 15 to 20 years was in excess of the maximum permitted by law for the offense charged. *State v. Blackmon,*260 N.C. 352, 132 S.E. 2d 880. The judgment of imprisonment entered against the defendant at the May Term, 1958 of the Superior Court of New Hanover County is vacated and set aside. The Superior Court will cause the defendant forthwith to be brought before the court for the imposition of a sentence not to exceed a maximum of ten years. The defendant is entitled to credit for the time served, including any allowance for his good behavior.

*Certiorari*allowed.

Sentence vacated.

Case remanded for proper judgment.
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 2 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 3 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 4 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 5 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 6 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 7 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 8 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 9 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 10 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 11 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 12 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 13 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 14 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 15 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 16 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 17 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 18 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 19 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 20 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 21 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 22 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 23 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 24 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 25 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-12 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 26 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 15-2 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 15-2 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-15154-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 24 (Tuesday, February 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5487-5488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-505]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Special Committee 147: Minimum Operational Performance 
Standards for Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance Systems Airborne 
Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 147 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 147: Minimum Operational Performance 
Standards for Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance Systems Airborne 
Equipment.

DATES: The meeting will be held February 15, 2007 from 9 a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L St. NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

[[Page 5488]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 147 meeting. The agenda will 
include:
    <bullet> February 15:
    <bullet> Opening Session (Welcome and Introductory Remarks, Review/
Approve meeting agenda for 64th meeting, Review/Approve Summary of 
Previous Meeting)
    <bullet> FAA TCAS II Program Office activities and charter update
    <bullet> SC-147 Activity Reports
    <bullet> Operations Working Group (OWG) Report
    <bullet> Surveillance Working Group (SWG) Report
    <bullet> Requirements Working Group (RWG) Activities
    <bullet> Closing Session (Other Business, Future Actions/
Activities, Date and Place of Next Meeting, Adjourn).
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 31, 2007.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 07-505 Filed 2-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Order entered April 11, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01587-CR

EDWARD DERELL HARMON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-54013-I

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s April 9, 2014 pro se request for an extension of time to 

file his response to the Anders brief filed by counsel. We ORDER appellant to file his pro se 

response by JUNE 9, 2014. If the response is not filed by that date, the appeal will be submitted 

on the Anders brief alone.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first-class mail, to Edward Derell 

Harmon, TDCJ No. 1891908, Polunsky Unit, 3872 F.M. 350, Livingston, Texas 77351.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the amended Annual Report of One Voice Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Dean Weber, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by section 9.06 has been
provided to One Voice and will be retained by One Voice and furnished to the
Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                         Dated: February 12, 2007

                         /s/ Dean Weber
                         -----------------------------
                         Name: Dean Weber
                         Title: President, Chief Executive Officer
                             and Interim Chief Financial  Officer
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 20-11127

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:18-cr-00327-SCB-AEP-9

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HOMAR GUERRERO-HERNANDEZ, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(December 8, 2020)

Before MARTIN, BRANCH, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

USCA11 Case: 20-11127 Date Filed: 12/08/2020 Page: 1 of 2
2

Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Homar Guerrero-Hernandez in this 

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of 

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Guerrero-Hernandez’s convictions and sentence are 

AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 20-11127 Date Filed: 12/08/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 7-2 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 1 of 1
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 9, 2007 / Presidential Documents 57479 

Proclamation 8186 of October 4, 2007 

Columbus Day, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

In 1492, Christopher Columbus set sail on a journey that changed the course 

of history. On Columbus Day, we celebrate this voyage of discovery and 

honor an Italian explorer who shaped the destiny of the New World. 

Christopher Columbus’ bold journey across the Atlantic opened new frontiers 

of exploration and demonstrated the power of perseverance. His journeys 

inspired other risk-takers and dreamers to test the bounds of their imagination 

and gave them the courage to accomplish great feats, whether crossing 

the world’s oceans or walking on the moon. Today, a new generation of 

innovators and pioneers continues to uphold the finest values of our country—discipline, ingenuity, and unity in the pursuit of great goals. 

As we look back on the contributions of the great explorer from Genoa, 

we also celebrate the many contributions that generations of Italian Americans have made to our Nation. Their service to America and ties to family, 

faith, and community have strengthened our country and enriched our culture. 

In commemoration of Columbus’ journey, the Congress, by joint resolution 

of April 30, 1934, and modified in 1968 (36 U.S.C. 107), as amended, 

has requested that the President proclaim the second Monday of October 

of each year as ‘‘Columbus Day.’’ 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim October 8, 2007, as Columbus Day. I call 

upon the people of the United States to observe this day with appropriate 

ceremonies and activities. I also direct that the flag of the United States 

be displayed on all public buildings on the appointed day in honor of 

Christopher Columbus. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRD1
57480 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 9, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07–5007 

Filed 10–5–07; 8:55 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRD1GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit 23.2

> 
Deloitte & Touche LLP          P.O. Box 49279          Four Bentall Centre          2100 - 1055 Dunsmuir Street          Vancouver, British Columbia          V7X 1P4

Tel: (604) 669- 4466          Fax: (604) 685- 0395          www.deloitte.ca

**Deloitte          & Touche **
** 

IndependentAuditors' Consent

   

We consentto the inclusion and use of our report dated February 14, 2003, with respect tothe consolidated financial statements of Clean Energy of Clean Energy CombustionSystems, Inc. in that corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscalyear ended December 31, 2002.

/s/  *Deloitte & Touche LLP*

Chartered Accountants  Vancouver, British Columbia, CanadaApril 14,  2003** ****