alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          17,382
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  129,696
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,193
<INVENTORY>                                    159,351
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               317,184
<PP&E>                                         399,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                 222,620
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 538,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          111,646
<BONDS>                                          3,575
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,584
<OTHER-SE>                                     362,522
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   538,656
<SALES>                                        791,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               791,897
<CGS>                                          549,827
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  549,827
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,115
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                113,799
<INCOME-TAX>                                    43,414
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             70,385
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    70,385
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.67
        

</TABLE>
Abatement Order filed August 1 , 2013.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00170

- CR

____________ CORNELIUS JACKSON , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No

. 2

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 12

- CCR

- 163243



### ABATEMENT ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due April 9, 2013

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. On May 14, 2013, this court ordered the court reporter to file the record within 30 days. When the court reporter failed to file the record as ordered, this court ordered the court reporter to file the record within 30 days, and in structed the court reporter that if the record was not filed, the court c ould order the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for failure to file the record. The recordhas not been filed with the court. The trial and appellate courts are jointly

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely as ordered, we issue the following order. We direct the judge of the County Court at Law No

. 2 to conduct a hearing at which the court reporter, appellant’s counsel, and the State ’s counsel shall participate (a) to determine the reason for failure to file the record; (b) to establish a date certain when the reporter’s record will be filed, and (c) to make findings as to whether the court reporter should be held in contempt of court for failing to file the reporter’s record timely as ordered. We order the court to prepare a record, in the form of a reporter’s record, of the hearing. The judge shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward to this court a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions. The hearing record and supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with the clerk of this court within 30 days of the date of this order.
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and re commendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. If the court reporter files the record prior to the date set for the hearing, the appeal will be reinstated and the trial court need not hold a hearing.

PER CURIAM
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Charles A. Runk et al., as Temporary Administrators of the Estate of Jessie Gillender, Deceased. Daniel J. Mooney, Individually and as Temporary Administrator, Appellant; Charles A. Runk, as Temporary Administrator, et al., Respondents.

*Matter of Runk,*181 App. Div. 461, affirmed.

(Argued May 29, 1918;

decided June 14, 1918.)

■ Appeal from so much of an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 8, 1918, as modifies a decree of the New York County Surrogate’s Court by reducing the amount of commissions allowed to appellant herein as temporary administrator of the estate of Jessie Gillender, deceased. There was but one question raised by this appeal: In a special proceeding for the settlement of the account of temporary administrators appointed pursuant to section 2596 of the Code of Civil Procedure, are commissions upon the value of the real estate of the decedent properly awarded to a temporary administrator, when the order appointing him conferred upon him authority under section 2600 to take possession of the real property affected by the will and to receive the rents and profits thereof, excluding the power to sell?

*Charles H. Tuttle*for appellant.

*Charles*■A. *Runk*respondent in person.

*Edward J. McGuire*for Missionary Society of St. Paul the Apostle, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

■ Concur: Chase, Hogan, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Not sitting: His cock, Ch. J.
#### STATE v. HOYLE

No. 109 PC

Case below: 49 NC App 98

Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 January 1981.
Gibb offs 

all the rights and liabilities of all the parties, and the district court did not 

certify its order as final. Thus, it did not appear that the challenged order 

was appealable pursuant to NRAP 3A(b)(1). See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 

Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000). In response, appellant agrees 

that the rights and liabilities of all the parties were not adjudicated by the 

district court. Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this 

appeal, and we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.' 

Saitta 

Pickering 

cc: Hon. Nancy L Allf, District Judge 

Agwara & Associates 

Eglet Prince 

Weller Law 

Clark County District Attorney/Civil Division 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

'Appellant's requests to remand this matter to the district court, 

waive any future filing fees, and dismiss this appeal without prejudice are 

denied. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) )947A
Foto de NIOSH

¿MUESTRAN SUS TRABAJADORES SIGNOS DE FATIGA? 

Si los trabajadores no duermen entre 7 y 9 horas por noche como se recomienda, podrían estar en peligro. En 

los EE. UU., uno de cada dos trabajadores de la extracción de minerales no duerme lo suficiente. Los trabajadores 

cansados pueden presentar un mayor número de consecuencias negativas para la salud, como diabetes, presión 

arterial alta, enfermedades cardiacas, accidentes cerebrovasculares y obesidad. Recuerde: El manejo correcto de 

la fatiga es una responsabilidad compartida que les permite a los trabajadores estar bien descansados y alertas en 

el trabajo. Tenga en cuenta la información a continuación para decidir cómo ayudar a los trabajadores a 

manejar la fatiga y asegúrese de que estén preparados para LEVANTARSE Y TRABAJAR EN LA MINA.

1. Shockey TM, Wheaton A G [2017]. Short sleep duration by occupation group—29 states, 2013–2014. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 66(8):207. https://dx.doi.org/10.15585%2Fmmwr.mm6608a2

La carga de la fatiga en los EE. UU.

Población de los EE. UU. Población minera

Promedio de horas trabajadas por semana2

34 44

Promedio de horas trabajadas por semana2

8.8 9.6

Porcentaje que trabaja más de 60 horas por semana3

7.2 17.3

2. Bureau of Labor Statistics [2019]. Employment, hours, and earnings from the current employment statistics survey. https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/dsrv?ce

3. Alterman T, Luckhaupt SE, Dahlhamer JM, Ward BW, Calvert GM [2013]. Prevalence rates of work organization characteristics among workers in the US: data from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Amer Journal Indust Medicine 56(6):647–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22108

¿Qué aumenta el riesgo de fatiga?

No dormir bien

13%de las lesiones en el

trabajo se pueden 

atribuir a problemas 

del sueño4

Horas de trabajo

Turnos largos + turnos de noche + sin descansos =

Riesgo de lesión 

incrementado más del doble5

4. Uehli K, Mehta AJ, Miedinger D, Hug K, Schindler C, Holsboer-Trachsler E, Leuppi JD, Künzli N [2014]. Sleep problems and work injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Reviews 18(1):61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2013.01.004

5. Fischer D, Lombardi DA, Folkard S, Willetts J, Christiani DC [2017]. Updating the “Risk Index”: A systematic review and meta-analysis of occupational injuries and work schedule characteristics. Chronobiology Int 34(10):1423–1438. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2017.1367305

¿Qué reduce el riesgo de fatiga?

Educar a los trabajadores 

sobre el sueño saludable

Programar bien los turnos

Pausas de descanso cada 

cierta cantidad de horas

Prueba voluntaria de 

trastornos del sueño

Reducir las tareas exigentes al final del 

turno y al final de la semana laboral

Servicios de traslado alternativos 

hacia el trabajo y de regreso a casa
#### WILLIAMS v. BISCUITVILLE, INC.

No. 101 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 405.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 June 1979.
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ronald W. Thiessen, Chief Executive Officer of Rockwell Ventures
  Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 20-F of
  the Company for the fiscal year ended 31 May 2005 (the “Annual Report”)
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the
  Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
  and results of operations of the Company.

Date: September 15, 2005

|       | /s/
      Ronald W. Thiessen | 
|------ | ---------------------------- | 
|By:    | Ronald W. Thiessen           | 
|Title: | Chief Executive Officer      | 

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
  and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on
  Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company
  and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
  20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
  except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
  purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
  "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated
  by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
  the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates
  it by reference.

---



---
#### Alexander S. Bacon, Respondent, *v.*Elizabeth Schlesinger, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Mark Schlesinger, Deceased, et al., Defendants, and Leo Schlesinger, Individually and as Executor of Abraham Schlesinger, Deceased, Appellant.

*Bacon*v. *Schlesinger,*171 App. Div. 503, affirmed.

(Argued October 31, 1918;

decided November 19, 1918.)

Appeal from a judgment entered March 20, 1916, upon an order of the Appellate Division of- the Supreme *691Court in the first judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term and directing judgment in favor of plaintiff. Plaintiff was retained *by Elizabeth Schlesinger, as administratrix of Mark Schlesinger, to represent her upon the accounting of the executors of Abraham Schlesinger and protect the rights of the estate of her intestate therein. There was a written retainer allowing plaintiff for. his services one-third the amount found due the estate. This action was brought to enforce the plaintiff’s lien upon the amount found due. The defendant Leo Schlesinger asserted a claim to this fund arising out of a contract in writing entered into between the said Leo Schlesinger and his four brothers of whom the decedent Mark Schlesinger was one. The trial justice held that the plaintiff’s lien upon the fund was inferior to that of Leo Schlesinger and granted judgment for the defendant. The Appellate Division reversed and held that unless Leo Schlesinger had a claim which was a valid charge against the share of Mark Schlesinger in his father’s estate at the time when the plaintiff’s lien attached, his claim was not entitled to priority over the attorney’s hen. It was not sufficient for such claim to be a general debt against the client. It must, in order to supersede the attorney’s hen, be a prior charge against the specific fund upon which the attorney’s hen had attached.

*Martin L. Stover*for appellant.

*Alexander S. Bacon,*respondent, in person.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ.
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 28 Filed 05/07/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### WATERS v. PHOSPHATE CORP.

No. 74 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 305.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 April 1977. .
#### HARRIS v. HARRIS

No. 122 PC.

Case below: 51 N.C. App. 103.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 June 1981.
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Franchise Holdings International, Inc (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, A. J. Boisdrenghien,  Chief Exercutive President, Secretary/Treasurer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:           December 15, 2010





/s/ A. J. Boisdrenghien


A. J. BoisdrenghienChief Executive Officer and President

(principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Siskiyou County Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Yreka, California, December 19, 2005. The meeting will include routine business, a discussion of larger scale projects, and the recommendation for implementation of submitted project proposals.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held December 19, 2005, from 4 p.m. until 6 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Yreka High School Library, Preece Way, Yreka, California.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Bob Talley, RAC Coordinator, Klamath National Forest, (530) 841-4423 or electronically at                         *rtalley@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Public comment opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

Dated: November 29, 2005.

Margaret J. Boland,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 05-23604 Filed 12-2-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Van Vliet, Interim President and Interim Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                                       
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 25, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/    David A. Van
Vliet                                                                             
|                     |  |  |  | David A. Van Vliet Interim President and Interim Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as our exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and shall not be deemed to be considered filed as part of the Quarterly Report Form 10-Q.
#### STATE v. SURGEON

No. 239P82.

Case below: 56 N.C. App. 632.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 July 1982.
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 3 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 201 (Thursday, October 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59081-59084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4828]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 07-60]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY:  Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 07-60 with attached transmittal, and 
policy justification.

    Dated: September 25, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 59082]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18OC07.000


[[Page 59083]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18OC07.001


[[Page 59084]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18OC07.002

[FR Doc. 07-4828 Filed 10-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 197 (Friday, October 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 58050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5040]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


California Coast Provincial Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The California Coast Provincial Advisory Committee (CCPAC) 
will meet on October 17, 2007, in Eureka, California. The purpose of 
the meeting is to discuss issues relating to implementing the Northwest 
Forest Plan (NWFP).

DATES: The meeting will be held from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Six Rivers National Forest, 
Supervisor's Office, 1330 Bayshore Way, Eureka, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Allen, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Six Rivers National Forest, 1330 Bayshore Way, Eureka, CA 95501, 
(707) 441-3557, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#375c5a565b5b525977514419515253194244"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="503b3d313c3c353e1036237e3635347e2523">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda topics to be covered include: (1) New 
Mexico Forest Restoration Principles; (2) Marijuana Cultivation; (3) 
Orleans Community Fuels Reduction Project; (4) Survey and Manage 
Update; (5) Northwest Forest Plan Update; and (6) Northern Spotted Owl 
Recovery Plan Update.
    The meeting is open to the public. Public input opportunity will be 
provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the 
Committee at that time.

    Dated: October 5, 2007.
Tyrone Kelley,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 07-5040 Filed 10-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
- Text206: 
    - Text207: 
    - Text208: 
    - Text209: 
    - Text210: 
    - Text211: 
    - Text212: 
    - Text213: 
    - Text214: