alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of William Lyon Homes (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William Lyon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/    WILLIAM LYON

---

William Lyon

Chief Executive Officer

March 11, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to William Lyon Homes and will be retained by William Lyon Homes and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### STATE v. COPELAND

No. 43 PC.

Case below: 11 N.C. App. 516.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 October 1971.
#### HOLLAND v. WALDEN

No. 90 PC.

Case below: 11 N.C. App. 281.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 30 July 1971.
#### FERGUSON v. FERGUSON

No. 93P82.

Case below: 55 N.C. App. 341.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 July 1982.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1025

LARRY WELLMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, and JERRIE LYNN WELLMAN, and on behalf of her brother; LARRY WELLMAN, JR., Plaintiffs, versusAPPALACHIAN RESEARCH & DEFENSE FUND, INCORPORATED, a/k/a Applered Legal Aid Services; WEST VIRGINIA LEGAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; WEST VIRGINIA STATE BAR, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-222-2) Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 22, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Larry Wellman, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas V. Flaherty, Scott H. Kaminski, FLAHERTY, SENSABAUGH & BONASSO, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia; James Patrick Martin, WEST VIRGINIA LEGAL SERVICES PLAN, INCORPORATED, Charleston, West Virginia; David James Mincer, BAILEY & WYANT, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Larry Wellman appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wellman v. Appalachian Research & Defense Fund, Inc. , No. CA-00- 222-2 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### CONNER v. INSURANCE CO.

No. 243 PC.

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 610.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 September 1979.
#### FUNGAROLI v. FUNGAROLI

No. 29.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 397.

Motion of defendant to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 June 1979.
#### HARMON v. PUGH

No. 165 P.C.

Case below: 38 N.C. App. 438.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1979.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.69 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001095588
<NAME> NBG BANCORP,INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   7-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         684,299
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 700,007
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                    48,968
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            869,066
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   (218,028)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 700,007
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                     0
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,297
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          (1,297)
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                216,731
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (218,028)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (218,028)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (218,028)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### John Martinkovics, Respondent, *v.*Lehigh Coal and Navigation Company, Appellant.

*Martinkovics*v. *Lehigh Coal & Nav.. Co.,*171 App. Div. 952, affirmed.

(Argued October 22, 1918;

decided November 26, 1918.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 5, 1916, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant, his employer. *704Plaintiff suffered the loss of his eyes through accidently striking some dynamite or a powder cap with his pick, while working in defendant's anthracite coal mine in Pennsylvania. It was alleged that the miner made a careless inspection after a blast, and then ordered plaintiff, his assistant, to go to work at the face of the breast. Defendant contended that there was no evidence of negligence on the part of the miner; that under the Pennsylvania law the defendant was not liable for any negligence of a certified miner, since it had no control over him; that there were fundamental errors in the charge as to- liability; and that there were vitally prejudicial errors in the admission of evidence.

*Herbert C. Smyth*and *Roderic Wellman*for appellant.

*Roger Foster,*L. *B. Treadwell*and *Richard W. Darling*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chase, Collin, Hogan and McLaughlin, JJ. Dissenting: Cuddeback, J. Not voting: Hiscock, Ch. J. Absent: Crane, J.
#### STATE v. LESLIE

No. 68 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 591.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 March 1976.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES THOMAS LEACH and ARTHUR LEROY LEGETTE.

(Filed 16 December, 1964.)

Criminal Law § 107—

Where defendant introduces evidence of an alibi, it is prejudicial error for the court to fail to charge the law applicable thereto.

*243Appeal by defendants from *Burgwyn, J.,*September 1964 Criminal Session of Dubham.

Defendants were jointly charged in one bill of indictment with the crime of common-law robbery. The State’s evidence tended to show that on the night of August 24, 1964, sometime before 10:50 p.m., on a dark street in Haiti in the City of Durham, the two defendants “jumped” the prosecuting witness, Clarence Spencer; that while defendant Leach held Spencer, defendant Legette took his pocketbook containing $20.00; and that both defendants then ran. Each defendant denied his guilt of the crime charged and offered evidence tending to show him, at the time of the alleged robbery, in the company of other persons at another place so far distant that he could not have been involved in it. The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged. From a judgment of imprisonment in the State’s prison each defendant appeals.

*Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Richard T. Sanders for the State.*

*Rudolph L. Edwards for James Thomas Leach defendant.*

*Lina Lee S. Stout for Arthur Leroy Legette defendant.*

Pee Curiam.

Although defendants’ primary defense was an alibi, his Honor inadvertently failed to charge on this substantive feature of the case. Defendants are entitled to have had the court apply the law to their evidence with respect to alibi. Under the authority of *State v. Gammons,*258 N.C. 522, 128 S.E. 2d 860, and *State v. Spencer,*256 N.C. 487, 124 S.E. 2d 175, defendants have the right to a new trial and it is so ordered.

New trial.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERUNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the filing by ARTISTdirect, Inc. (the “Registrant”) of itsAnnual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the“Annual Report”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Jonathan V.Diamond, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Annual Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theAnnual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Registrant.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Date:       April 25, 2006 | By:    | /s/ JONATHAN V. DIAMOND        |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                                                     |   | Jonathan V. Diamond            |
|                                                     |   | Chief Executive Officer        |
|                                                     |   | (Principal Executive  Officer) |

 

----
#### COCKRELL v. TRANSPORT CO.

No. 58 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 172.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 5 April 1977.
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 1 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 2 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 3 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 4 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 5 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 6 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 7 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 8 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 9 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 10 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 11 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 12 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 13 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 14 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 15 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 16 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 17 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 18 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 19 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 20 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 21 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 22 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 23 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 24 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 25 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 26 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 27 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 28 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 29 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 30 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 31 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 32 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 33 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 34 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 35 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 36 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 37 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 38 of 39
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 39 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-8 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-8 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 2 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-8 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 3 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-8 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 4 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-8 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 5 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-8 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 6 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-8 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 7 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-8 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 8 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-8 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 9 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-8 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 10 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-8 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 11 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-8 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 12 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-8 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 13 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-8 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 14 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03558-LAK Document 7 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03558-LAK Document 7 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
April 18, 2023 

Dr. Kenneth Fent, PhD, CIH 

Team Lead, National Firefighter Registry for Cancer

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

RE: National Firefighter Registry for Cancer

Dear Dr. Fent,

On behalf of the more than 334,000 members of the International Association of Fire Fighters 

(IAFF), allow me to offer this letter in support of the creation, implementation, and stewardship 

of the National Firefighter Registry (NFR) for Cancer. 

The IAFF’s mission has always focused on improving the health and safety of fire fighters across 

the United States who place their lives on the line every day in service to others. When the alarm 

is struck, our members answer the call without hesitation and with the knowledge that the 

occupational exposures they face may ultimately take their lives.

Cancer is the number one killer of fire fighters. Only through monumental endeavors, like the 

NFR for Cancer, will we be able to track, understand, and turn the tide on fire fighter cancer. The 

NFR for Cancer’s goal to enroll more than 200,000 fire fighters is a goal the IAFF stands behind. 

We support our members’ participation in the Registry, as it will be the generations of fire 

fighters who follow us that ultimately sit in the shade of this tree you are planting.

Your efforts, through the NFR for Cancer, with help protect our brother and sister fire fighters, 

help lessen the impact of cancer within our membership, improve our understanding of cancer 

within all sub-groups and demographics in the fire service, and pave the way for improvements 

to the health and wellbeing of our nation’s next generation of fire fighters. 

On behalf of the IAFF, I share my utmost support for the National Firefighter Registry for 

Cancer and look forward to the positive outcomes it will provide for fire fighters today and into 

the future. 

Sincerely,



Edward A. Kelly 

General President
vir-ex1034_1063.htm



 

Exhibit 10.34

 

CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY [***], HAS BEEN OMITTED BECAUSE IT IS BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED.

 


		
	
AMENDMENT INFORMATION

	
Agreement to be Amended:
	
Grant agreement between the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Vir Biotechnology, Inc. effective March 16, 2018 and bearing Investment ID OPP1182112

	
Amendment Purpose:
	
Reporting & Payment Schedule Change

	
Amendment Date:
	
Date of this email




 

THIS AMENDMENT amends, and is made part of, the above-referenced Agreement and is effective as of the date of this email. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment will have the meaning provided in the Agreement. Except as modified by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. In the event    of a conflict between the Agreement and this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment will prevail.

 

 



 

UPDATED REPORTING & PAYMENT SCHEDULE

This Amendment notifies You that the reporting and/or payment schedule for Your grant has changed. Your updated Reporting & Payment Schedule is deleted and replaced with the following:

 


	
REPORTING & PAYMENT SCHEDULE

	
Investment Period
	
Target, Milestone, or

Reporting Deliverable
	
Due By
	
Payment Date
	
Payment Amount

(U.S.$)

	
 
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]

	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]

	
 
	
[***]
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]

	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]

	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
 
	
 

	
Amended Total Grant Amount
	
Up to $14,882,418.08