alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk October 22, 2012

s1015 

# Order

October 22, 2012

145281

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145281

COA: 308572

Kent CC: 04

- 001615

- FC

JERRY LOUIS DAVID,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 20, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Case 7:07-cr-00374-CLB Document 22 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit
        21.1**
 **LIST
        OF SUBSIDIARIES**
 
 1.
        GuildMaster, Inc., a Missouri corporation, doing business under the name
        "GuildMaster".
 
 2.
        Faith
        Walk Designs, Inc., a Missouri corporation, doing business under the names
        "Faith Walk" and "Faith
        Walk Designs".
  3.
        WestWay Enterprises, Ltd., a Hong Kong corporation, doing business
        under the name "WestWay".
  4.
        P.T.
        Niaga Merapi, an Indonesian corporation, doing business under
        the name
        "Merapi".
Exhibit 32




             Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
   As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Louisville Gas and
Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company (the "Companies") on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned does hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge,

1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Companies as of the dates and for the period expressed in the Report.


May 13, 2004



                                 /s/  Victor A. Staffieri
                                 Chairman of the Board, President
                                 and Chief Executive Officer
                                 Louisville Gas and Electric Company
                                 Kentucky Utilities Company





                                 /s/  S. Bradford Rives
                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                 Louisville Gas and Electric Company
                                 Kentucky Utilities Company





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
#### STIREWALT v. SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOC.

No. 85 PC.

Case below: 11 N.C. App. 241.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 30 July 1971.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-27-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-26-2000
<CASH>                                             350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,290
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,375
<PP&E>                                          11,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,330
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,190
<BONDS>                                          1,844
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              891
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           481
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,148
<SALES>                                          8,195
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,195
<CGS>                                            6,494
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,494
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  69
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     51
<INCOME-TAX>                                        18
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 22
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        22
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of ISA Internationale Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1.) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operation of the Company.  By: /s/ Bernard L. Brodkorb Bernard L. Brodkorb, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, Chairman of the Board  Dated: February 17, 2012
#### STATE v. PIERCE

No. 18.

Case below: 21 N.C. App. 451.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 13 August 1974.
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 4 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Active Care Medical Supply Corp., as Assignee of Yvonne, Frazer, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>American Transit Ins. Co., Respondent. </font></b></div><br><br><p>The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant.Law Office of Daniel J. Tucker (Joshua M. Goldberg of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Mary V. Rosado, J.), entered September 5, 2017. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath, and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.</p><p>For the reasons stated in<i> Allay Med. Servs., P.C., as Assignee of Mills, Keith A. v Metropolitan Gen. Ins. Co.</i> (___ Misc 3d ___, 2019 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2017-2389 K C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.</p><br><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: October 11, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A1755. WILLIE S. JENKINS, JR. v. WILLIE MUNFORD, ON BEHALF

OF NEW WILLOW GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH et al.

Plaintiffs Willie Munford, Ginneski Munford, and Tracey Cheevers, on behalf

of New Willow Grove Baptist Church filed a complaint for, inter alia, declaratory

judgment against Willie S. Jenkins, Jr., in this property dispute. The plaintiffs

thereafter amended their complaint to add a claim for quiet title, and the court

appointed a special master to conduct a title abstract. The plaintiffs then filed a

motion to bifurcate the action, and the matter proceeded to a bench trial only asto the

claims raised in the original complaint. Following the bench trial, the court entered

an order granting declaratory judgment to the plaintiffs, canceling Jenkins’s deed, and

awarding the plaintiffs attorney fees. Jenkins then filed this direct appeal. We lack

jurisdiction. 

“In a case involvingmultiple parties or multiple claims, a decision adjudicating

fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of less than all the parties is not

a final judgment.” Johnson v. Hosp. Corp. of Am., 192 Ga. App. 628, 629 (385 SE2d

731) (1989) (punctuation omitted). In such circumstances, there must be either an

express determination that there is no just reason for delay under OCGA § 9-11-54

(b) or compliance with the interlocutory appeal requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). 

See id. “Where neither of these code sections [is] followed, the appeal is premature

and must be dismissed.” Id. (punctuation omitted).

The order on appeal resolved the declaratory judgment action and canceled

Jenkins’s deed. However, the order did not resolve the quiet title claim. See OCGA

§ 23-3-66 et seq. Further, the order did not direct the entry of final judgment in

January 16, 2020
accordance with OCGA § 9-11-54 (b). Under these circumstances, Jenkins’s failure

to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures deprives us of jurisdiction over

this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

01/16/2020
#### WHITLEY v. REDDEN

No. 62 PC.

Case below: 5 N.C. App. 705.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 16 October 1969.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         185,424
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               29,165,559
<ALLOWANCES>                                   456,000
<INVENTORY>                                 28,792,650
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            60,234,709
<PP&E>                                      50,030,906
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,688,584
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              94,071,054
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,948,765
<BONDS>                                     18,303,207
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,157,898
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                94,071,054
<SALES>                                    223,727,921
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           223,727,921
<CGS>                                      184,433,390
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              184,433,390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            20,655,625
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,647,878
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             16,991,028
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,700,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,291,028
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,280,115
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,010,913
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.78
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 5 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 5 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 5 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03364-LAK Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03364-LAK Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03364-LAK Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03364-LAK Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 4 of 9
EXHIBIT A 

Case 1:07-cv-03364-LAK Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03364-LAK Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03364-LAK Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03364-LAK Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03364-LAK Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 9 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 4 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 4 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 4 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATIONS

I, Beverly A Cummings., Chief Financial Officer of PrimeEnergy Corporation, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PrimeEnergy Corporation.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by  this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

          a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit  committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);

          a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of  internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

August 13, 2004  
/s/ Beverly A. Cummings.   
-------------------------------------
  
Beverly A Cummings   
Chief Financial Officer   
PrimeEnergy Corporation
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 35 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 23











Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants





To Bairnco Corporation and Subsidiaries:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8, File No. 33-36330) pertaining to the Bairnco Corporation 1990 Stock Incentive Plan of Bairnco Corporation and subsidiaries and (Form S-8, File No. 33-41313) pertaining to the Bairnco Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan and Trust of Bairnco Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated January 29, 2004 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Bairnco Corporation and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.



Our audits also included the financial statement schedules of Bairnco Corporation and subsidiaries listed in Item 15(a)2. This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.





/s/ Ernst &Young LLP





Tampa, Florida

March 18, 2004
EXHIBIT 31.1 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, William A. Shumaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kewaunee ScientificCorporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c)disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: September 15, 2003 

 

/s/    WILLIAM A. SHUMAKER
William A. ShumakerPresidentand Chief Executive Officer