alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. PERRY SANDERS

No. 104

(Filed 7 September 1971)

Homicide § 31; Criminal Law § 135— first-degree murder — death sentence — remand for sentence of life imprisonment

Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States, two first-degree murder cases in which the defendant received the death penalty in each case are remanded to the superior court with direction that the defendant be sentenced in each case to life imprisonment in the State’s prison.

Justices Higgins and Lake dissenting.

On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States.

MOORE, Justice.

Defendant, Perry Sanders, was indicted on two charges of murder in the first degree. At the trial at the November 17, 1969 Criminal Session of the Superior Court of Forsyth County, North Carolina, the cases were consolidated for trial. The jury returned a verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree in each case. Thereupon the court pronounced judgment in each case which imposed the death sentence. Upon defendant’s appeal, *390this Court found “No error” in the trial and judgments. *State v. Sanders,*276 N.C. 598, 174 S.E. 2d 487 (1970). On June 28, 1971, upon its consideration of defendant’s petition for writ of *certiorari,*the Supreme Court of the United States entered the following order: “The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgments, insofar as they impose the death sentence, are reversed, *United States v. Jackson,*390 U.S. 570 (1968), *Pope v. United States,*392 U.S. 651 (1968), and the cases are remanded for further proceedings.” *Perry Sanders, Petitioner v. North Carolina,*403 U.S. 948, 29 L. Ed. 2d 860, 91 S.Ct. 2290 (1971).

Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States, these cases are remanded to the Superior Court of Forsyth County with directions to proceed as follows:

1. The presiding judge of the Superior Court of Forsyth County will cause to be served on the defendant, Perry Sanders, and on his attorneys of record, notice to appear during a session of said superior court at a designated time, not less than ten days from the date of the order. At such time, in open court, the defendant, Perry Sanders, being present in person and being represented by his attorneys, the presiding judge, based on the verdicts of guilty of murder in the first degree returned by the jury at the trial at the November 17, 1969 Criminal Session, will pronounce judgment in each case that the defendant, Perry Sanders, be imprisoned for life in the State’s prison.

2. The presiding judge of the Superior Court of Forsyth County will issue a writ of *habeas corpus*to the official having custody of the defendant, Perry Sanders, to produce him in open court at the time and for the purpose of being present when the judgments imposing life imprisonment are pronounced.

Remanded for judgments.

Justices Higgins and Lake dissent for the reasons stated in their separate dissenting opinions filed this day in *State v. Hill, ante*371, 183 S.E. 2d 97 (1971).
#### HUNTER v. LIABILITY CO.

No. 228 PC.

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 496.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 August 1979.
#### STATE v. GARDNER

No. 78 PC

Case below: 49 NC App

Application by defendant for further review denied 2 December 1980.
Case 1:06-cv-15076-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. RICH

No. 60 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 458.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 1978.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           18822
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      712
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 19534
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   19534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              191
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       19343
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     19534
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 14782
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   637
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   285
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  13860
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              13860
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (574)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     13287
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   139.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   139.42
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. RAY BRYANT.

(Filed 19 September 1962.)

Appeal by defendant from *Fountain, Special Judge,*March Term 1962 of CeaveN.

This is a criminal action tried upon a bill of indictment charging the defendant with an assault with a deadly weapon with felonious intent to kill and murder Grover Lancaster, Jr., inflicting serious injuries not resulting in death.

The jury returned a verdict of guilty of assault with a deadly weapon. Judgment was pronounced on the verdict and the defendant appeals, assigning error.

*Attorney General Bruton, Asst. Attorney General Moody for the State.*

*Reginald L. Frazier, Samuel S. Mitchell for the defendant.*

PER Cueiam.

The evidence adduced by the State in the trial below was sufficient to carry the case to the jury, and the appellant has not shown error sufficiently prejudicial to justify upsetting the verdict of the twelve.

No error.
Case 1:07-cv-03251-JSR Document 6 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 1 of 1
Order entered May 29, 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 12

- 01347

- CR

RICHARD BIGGS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court At Law No. 1

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11CL

- 0993

- 2



### O RDER

T he Court GRANTS the State’s May 26, 2013 motion for extension of time to file the

State’s brief.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the State’s brief as of the date of this order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 10





                          [CNOOC Limited Letterhead]




May 23, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549


Re:  Representations by Arthur Andersen & Co in connection with the audit of
     CNOOC Limited


Ladies and Gentlemen:

On behalf of CNOOC Limited (the "Company"), please be advised that Arthur
Andersen & Co ("Andersen") has represented to the Company that its audit of
the Company's consolidated financial statements included in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2001, to which this
letter is an exhibit, was subject to Andersen's quality control system for the
U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the
engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there
was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit,
availability of U.S. national office consultation, and availability of
personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant portions
of the audit.

Sincerely,

/s/ Mark Qiu

Mark Qiu
CFO & Senior Vice President
# National POW/MIA Recognition Day, 2007

America has been blessed by the brave men and women of our Armed Forces who have answered the call to defend our country and protect liberty around the world. On National POW/MIA Recognition Day, we honor a special group of patriots: those who have been prisoners of war and those who are still missing in action. We remain forever in their debt, and we renew our commitment to them and to their families never to rest until we have accounted for every missing service member. 

To commemorate this day, the National League of Families POW/MIA flag is flown over the White House, the Capitol, the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, the Korean War Veterans Memorial, the World War II Memorial, and other locations across our country. This flag is an enduring symbol that reflects our solemn commitment to our courageous service members who have been imprisoned while serving in conflicts around the world and to those who remain missing. America will always remember these heroes, and we underscore our pledge to achieve the fullest possible accounting for every missing member of our Armed Forces. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim Friday, September 21, 2007, as National POW/MIA Recognition Day. I call upon the people of the United States to join me in honoring and remembering all former American prisoners of war and those missing in action who valiantly served our great country. I also call upon Federal, State, and local government officials and private organizations to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07-4766

Billing code 3195-01-P
| **EXHIBIT 32** 
     Harry Lee Waterfield II and			Raymond L. Carr, being the President and Vice President, Chief			Financial Officer, respectively, of Kentucky Investors, Inc., hereby			certify as of this 13th day of November, 2007, that the Form 10-Q			for the Quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the			requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange			Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q			fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition			and results of operations of Kentucky Investors, Inc.
 

 
 
**KENTUCKY			INVESTORS, INC.**   
BY:
/s/Harry Lee			Waterfield II  
Harry Lee			Waterfield II
DATE: November			13, 2007 
President    
BY:
/s/Raymond L.			Carr  
Raymond L.			Carr
DATE: November			13, 2007 
Vice President			- Chief Financial Officer
 

  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00037-CV

Stephen N. Lisson, Appellant

v.

Mary Padgett, Appellee

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. 282,786, HONORABLE ORLINDA NARANJO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Stephen N. Lisson’s brief was due on June 9, 2008.

On December 15, 2008, this Court notified Lisson that his brief was overdue and that his failure to

file a proper motion for extension of time by December 29, 2008, would result in the dismissal of

his appeal for want of prosecution. To date, Lisson has not filed a brief or a motion for extension

of time. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

___________________________________________

 Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: February 5, 2009
---

Exhibit 31.1





Certification





I, Isy Goldwasser, certify that:





1.     I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Symyx Technologies, Inc.; and





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report.











June 10, 2009
/s/ Isy GoldwasserIsy Goldwasser
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 190 

To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to prohibit assistance to 

nonprofits, foreign nongovernmental organizations, and quasi-autonomous 

nongovernmental organizations that promote or perform abortions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2019 

Mr. LEE (for himself, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. WICKER, 

Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. ROUNDS, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. 

BLUNT, Ms. ERNST, Mr. DAINES, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. 

MCCONNELL, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. SASSE, Mr. COTTON, Mr. RISCH, Mr. 

THUNE, Mr. BARRASSO, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. CRAPO, 

Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. MORAN, Mr. LANKFORD, Mrs. FISCHER, and Mr. ENZI) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to prohibit 

assistance to nonprofits, foreign nongovernmental organizations, and quasi-autonomous nongovernmental organizations that promote or perform abortions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Life in 

5 Global Health Assistance Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 190 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ASSISTANCE TO FOREIGN NON2 PROFITS, FOREIGN NONGOVERNMENTAL OR3 GANIZATIONS, AND QUASI-AUTONOMOUS 

4 NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS THAT 

5 PROMOTE OR PERFORM ABORTIONS. 

6 Chapter 1 of part III of the Foreign Assistance Act 

7 of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2351 et seq.) is amended by adding 

8 at the end the following new section: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 620N. PROHIBITION ON ASSISTANCE TO FOREIGN 

10 NONPROFITS, FOREIGN NONGOVERNMENTAL 

11 ORGANIZATIONS, AND QUASI-AUTONOMOUS 

12 NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS THAT 

13 PROMOTE OR PERFORM ABORTIONS. 

14 ‘‘No assistance may be furnished under this Act to 

15 any foreign nonprofit, foreign nongovernmental organiza16 tion, or quasi-autonomous nongovernmental organization 

17 that promotes or performs abortion, except in cases of 

18 rape or incest or when the life of the mother would be 

19 endangered if the fetus were carried to term.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-03480-AKH Document 2 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

           Harry Lee Waterfield II and Raymond L. Carr, being the President and VicePresident, Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Investors Heritage CapitalCorporation, hereby certify as of this 12th day of November, 2010, that the Form10-Q for the Quarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofInvestors Heritage Capital Corporation.

 

 

|   | **INVESTORS HERITAGE CAPITAL CORPORATION** 
  
BY:  /s/Harry Lee Waterfield II 
Harry Lee Waterfield II
DATE: November 12, 2010
President 
  
BY:  /s/Raymond L. Carr 
Raymond L. Carr
DATE: November 12, 2010
Vice President - Chief Financial Officer
 

 

  |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      10,569,485
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,494,912
<ALLOWANCES>                                   185,000
<INVENTORY>                                 19,790,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,502,835
<PP&E>                                      15,773,440
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,577,918
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,698,357
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,043,525
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       505,552
<OTHER-SE>                                  41,377,310
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,698,357
<SALES>                                     88,397,388
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            88,486,479
<CGS>                                       52,247,703
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               79,235,771
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,241
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,224,467
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,744,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,479,867
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,479,867
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ARTHUR ALAN WOLK, PHILIP 

BROWNDIES, AND CATHERINE 

MARCHAND,

Respondents

v.

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LOWER 

MERION,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 152 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-13-00344- CV

Shaw n Hizey, Appellan t

v. Deutsche Bank Trust Com pany Ame ricas as Trustee for Rali 2007 QS 2, Appellee

F ROM TH E CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO . 4 O F WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY , NO. 13- 0180 -CC4, HO NORAB LE JO HN MCM ASTER, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appea l stating that appellant no longe r wishes to pursue his appea l. We g rant the motion and dismiss the appea l. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)( 1).

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Jus tice Be fore J ustices Puryear , Rose, and Goodwin Dismissed on J oint Moti on Filed: Jul y

30, 2013
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0606 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. COR EY MICHAEL KELLY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 8 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 13 2023

04/13/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0606
(LOGO)CHARTER
Bank *  Mortgage *  Insurance


Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562
Attention: Master Servicing

RE: Officer's Certificate


Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1999 fiscal year:

(A) I have reviewed the activities and  performance of the Servicer during the
    preceding fiscal year under the terms of the  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust
    Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer Guide and
    to the best of these Officers' knowledge, the Servicer has fulfilled all of
    its  duties, responsibilities or obligations under these Agreements
    throughout such  year, or if there has been a default or  failure of the
    servicer to perform any of such duties, responsibilities or obligations, a
    description of each  default or failure and the nature and status  thereof
    has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(B) I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is currently an approved FNMA or FHLMC
    servicer in good standing;

(C) I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions Insurance
    Policy  and any other  bonds  required  under  the  terms of the  Servicing
    Agreement,   Trust  Agreement,   Pooling  and  Servicing  Agreement  and/or
    Seller/Servicer Guide are in full force and effect;

(D) All premiums for each Hazard Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance Policy (if
    applicable) and Primary Mortgage  Insurance  Policy (if  applicable),  with
    respect  to each  Mortgaged  Property,  have  been  paid  and that all such
    insurance policies are in full force and effect;

(E) All real estate taxes,  governmental  assessments  and any other  expenses
    accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or encumbrance on
    any Mortgaged  property,  have been paid, or if any such costs or expenses
    have not been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property,  the reason for
    the non-payment has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(F) All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

(G) All annual reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of Mortgage  Property
    required per section 6050H,  6050J and 6050P of the Internal  Revenue Code,
    respectively, have been prepared and filed.

Certified By:

Officer

SVP/CFO
Title

7/11/00
Date

2130 Eubank Blvd NE * P.O. Box 11519 * Albuquerque, NM 87192-0519 * 505-291-3700
(f) 505-296-7998

FDIC INSURED