alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

            Harry Lee Waterfield II and RaymondL. Carr, being the President and Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,respectively, of Kentucky Investors, Inc., hereby certify as of this 8th day ofMay, 2008, that the Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended March 31, 2008 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Kentucky Investors, Inc.

 

|   | **KENTUCKY			INVESTORS, INC.**   
BY:
/s/Harry Lee			Waterfield II  
Harry Lee			Waterfield II
DATE: May 8,			2008 
President    
BY:
/s/Raymond L.			Carr  
Raymond L.			Carr
DATE: May 8,			2008 
Vice President			- Chief Financial Officer
 

  |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
AN ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERVENTIONS THAT REDUCE KNEE 

INJURIES IN UNDERGROUND MINING 

MOORE S.M., POLLARD J.P. 

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA 

Aims: 

The 2007 United States Mine Safety and Health Administration database reported 227 knee injuries occurring in 

underground coal. From workers’ compensation data, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 

(NIOSH) determined that the average cost per knee injury in this industry was $13,121.29 yielding nearly three 

million dollars as an estimated financial burden of these injuries on the industry in 2007. Recently, NIOSH has 

investigated various types of interventions that underground coal mining companies may implement as means 

for decreasing mine workers’ risk for developing knee injuries. These interventions include a training program 

that instructs mine workers how to identify symptoms of knee injuries and seek medical attention, redesign their 

work areas to reduce twisting on the knees, routinely move their knee joints through their full range of motion 

when kneeling or squatting for extended periods of time, maintain good hygiene of clothing and kneepads to 

reduce injuries due to infected hair follicles, and implement at-home strengthening and stretching regimens for 

the leg muscles. To encourage mining companies to implement this training program and interventions currently 

in development, NIOSH performed an analysis of workers’ compensation data for one underground coal mine in 

Illinois and six in Pennsylvania. 

Methods: 

The data were for the 2004, 2005, and 2006 claim years of each mine and included medical and indemnity costs 

for injuries to each body part, the number of injuries per body part, and the annual audited payroll. The rating 

formulas for the respective states were utilized to determine workers’ compensation premiums for 2008 which 

require injury data from 2004 to 2006. For each mine, the cost of workers’ compensation premiums were 

determined for all the injuries reported. A second analysis was then performed whereby all knee injuries were 

excluded. 

Results: 

By eliminating knee injuries, the annual workers’ compensations premiums decreased by 1.1% to 9.3%. This 

translated to a savings of $4,206 to $1,379,876. 

Conclusion: 

The cost of implementing the NIOSH training program is minimal as mines are required to provide annual safety 

training whereby the NIOSH training program could easily be provided to the mine workers. Moreover, based on 

experimental data NIOSH collected during kneeling and crawling tasks, NIOSH is currently developing a 

kneepad for miners that are restricted to their knees. This kneepad will better distribute the forces applied to the 

knee decreasing the stress experienced at the knee and reducing injury risk.
Case 1:07-cv-03413-LAP     Document 19      Filed 10/18/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03413-LAP     Document 19      Filed 10/18/2007     Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 3 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 4 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 5 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 6 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 7 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 8 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 9 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 10 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 11 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 12 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 13 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 14 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 15 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 16 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 17 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 18 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 19 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 20 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 21 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 22 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 23 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 24 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 25 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 26 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 27 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 28 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 29 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 30 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 31 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 32 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 33 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 34 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 35 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 36 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 37 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 38 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 39 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 40 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 41 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 42 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 34-3 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 43 of 43
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1215

ASSEGID ASSEFA NADEW,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A75-374-330)

Submitted: September 30, 2003 Decided: October 7, 2003

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mikre-Michael Ayele, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D.

Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David V. Bernal, Assistant

Director, Jennifer Paisner, Office of Immigration Litigation,

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Assegid Assefa Nadew, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”). The order, entered on January 23, 2003, denied

Nadew’s motion to reconsider the Board’s June 24, 2002 order,

affirming without opinion, the immigration judge’s order denying

his applications for asylum and withholding of removal. Because

Nadew did not raise the denial of the motion for reconsideration in

his brief, we deem this issue abandoned. See Edwards v. City of

Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241 (4th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, we deny

the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### STATE v. REDDICK

No. 101P82.

Case below: 55 N.C. App. — (813SC705).

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 30 March 1982.
#### STATE v. BROADWAY

No. 278 PC.

Case below: 42 N.C. App. 257.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 September 1979.
#### STATE v. BUTCHER

No. 23 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 572.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 April 1977.
Exhibit 3.4

Delaware

---

The First State

I, HARRIET SMITH WINDSOR, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT OF WILLIAM LYON HOMES, FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH, A.D. 2007, AT 3:49 OCLOCK P.M.

A FILED COPY OF THIS CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN FORWARDED TO THE NEW CASTLE COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS.



|                        |  |      |                                           |      |                   | 
|----------------------- |  | ---- | ----------------------------------------- | ---- | ----------------- | 
|                        |  | LOGO |                                           | LOGO
|                        |  |      | Harriet Smith Windsor, Secretary Of State
|3070283 8100  070280136 |  |      | AUTHENTICATION:  DATE:                    |      | 5480773  03-05-07



---

State of DelawareSecretary of StateDivision of CorporationsDelivered 03:55 PM 03/05/2007FILED 03:49 PM 03/05/2007SRV 070280136 - 3070283 FILE\


CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

OF

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

WILLIAM LYON HOMES,

a Delaware corporation

William Lyon Homes, a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the Corporation), hereby certifies as follows:

1.
That Article IV, Paragraph (A) of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is amended to read in full as follows:

The total number of shares of stock which the corporation shall have authority to issue is Three Thousand (3,000) shares of Common Stock, having a par value of $.01 per share.

2. The foregoing amendment to the Corporations Certificate of Incorporation has been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242
of the Delaware General Corporation Law by approval of the Board of Directors of the Corporation and by the holders representing a majority of the voting power of the outstanding Common Stock of the Corporation and entitled to vote thereon.



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of
Incorporation to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 27th day of February, 2007.



William Lyon HomesBy:

LOGOName:

W. Douglass HarrisTitle:

Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller and Corporate Secretary




- 2 -
#### WAFF BROS., INC. v. BANK

No. 129 PC.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 517.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 25 August 1975.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2038 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the credit for 

alternative fuel vehicle refueling property, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 27, 2019 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO (for herself, Ms. SMITH, and Mrs. GILLIBRAND) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the credit for alternative fuel vehicle refueling property, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clean Fuel Infrastruc5 ture Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CREDIT FOR ALTERNATIVE FUEL 

7 VEHICLE REFUELING PROPERTY. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (g) of section 30C of 

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2038 IS

1 ‘‘December 31, 2017’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

2 2021’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

5 December 31, 2017. 

6 SEC. 3. MODIFICATION OF CREDIT LIMITATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 30C of 

8 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘with respect to all’’ and insert10 ing ‘‘with respect to any single item of’’, 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘at a location’’, and 

12 (3) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘a property’’ 

13 and inserting ‘‘any such item of property’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

16 December 31, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1886 

To restrict security assistance to Lebanon, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2019 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself and Mr. CRAMER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To restrict security assistance to Lebanon, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Countering Hezbollah 

5 in Lebanon’s Military Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORT ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEBANESE 

7 ARMED FORCES AND HEZBOLLAH. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the 

9 date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall sub10 mit a report to Congress— 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1886 IS

1 (1) identifying all military officers, com2 manders, advisors, officials, or other personnel with 

3 significant influence over the policies or activities of 

4 the Lebanese Armed Forces who are members of, 

5 paid by, or significantly influenced by Hezbollah; 

6 and 

7 (2) describing military activities conducted by 

8 the Lebanese Armed Forces to disarm Hezbollah 

9 pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolu10 tion (UNSCR) 1701 (2006). 

11 (b) FORM.—The report required under subsection (a) 

12 shall be submitted in unclassified form but may contain 

13 a classified annex. 

14 SEC. 3. RESTRICTION ON SECURITY ASSISTANCE. 

15 (a) IN GENERAL.—Of the amounts appropriated or 

16 otherwise made available for security assistance for the 

17 Government of Lebanon for a fiscal year, 20 percent may 

18 not be obligated or expended for such purpose until the 

19 President certifies to Congress that— 

20 (1) the Lebanese Armed Forces has taken 

21 measurable steps in the last year to limit the influ22 ence or expel anyone identified pursuant to section 

23 2(a)(1); 

24 (2) the activities described pursuant to section 

25 2(a)(2) demonstrate a serious commitment by the 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1886 IS

1 Lebanese Armed Forces to fulfill its obligation to 

2 disarm Hezbollah pursuant to UNSCR 1701; and 

3 (3) the Lebanese Armed Forces have not co4 operated, coordinated, or partnered with Hezbollah 

5 in any operation, campaign, or military exercise dur6 ing the last year. 

7 (b) NATIONAL SECURITY WAIVER.—The President 

8 may waive the certification requirements under para9 graphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) if the President cer10 tifies to Congress that it is in the national security interest 

11 of the United States. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          2,348,083
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  22,483,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                      446,681
<INVENTORY>                                    13,271,547
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               40,072,917
<PP&E>                                         63,926,292
<DEPRECIATION>                                 29,077,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 79,095,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          18,861,938
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                        9,390,268
<OTHER-SE>                                     26,803,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   79,095,753
<SALES>                                        80,037,720
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               80,037,720
<CGS>                                          61,490,520
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  61,490,520
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               12,863,268
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                305,778
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 5,378,154
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,831,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             3,547,154
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,547,154
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.66
        


</TABLE>
DON REED Appellant

vs. IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS COA# 02^15-00173-CR THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee * * * *

* * 

### RECEIVED IN \ COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALf SEP 28 2016 FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: COMES NOW, the Appellant, ProSe, and respectfully moves theCourt to 

### extend the time for filing* petitionforidis?retionary review inthis cause, and in support therefore would show theCourt as follows: I. 

### ThatAppellantwas fbundgunty of the offense of ImpedingBreath, Family Violence, Cause No.F-20l2-2654-C inthe 211th District Court ofDenton County, 

### Texas. Appellant was sentenced by the court and timely gave notice ofAppeal. II, 

### Appellant's petition for discretionary review is currently due on September 26,2016. III. Rl£D IN.-.' . COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Abel Acosta, Clerk

### Appellant hereby requests an extension oftime to file his Petition for 

### Discretionary Review until October 26, 2016, and as reasons therefore would show this cause as follows: 

### Appellantrequires additional time to consultwith aiidpotentially retain Counsel forrepresentation. 

### WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant respectfully requests this Honorable Court to extend the time for filing Appellant's Petition for Discretionary Review in this cause to October 26,2016. Respectfully submitted, Don Reed•, Pro Se 1605 Hemphill St Greenville, Tx. 75401 214-334-5070 Dreedl901 @ymail.corn CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifythat a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing motion was delivered to Paul Johnson, District Attorney for Denton County, Texas, on September26,2016. Don R^ed, Pro Se
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2099 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2099

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To redesignate the Sullys Hill National Game Preserve in the State of 
      North Dakota as the White Horse Hill National Game Preserve.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``White Horse Hill National Game 
Preserve Designation Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF WHITE HORSE HILL NATIONAL GAME PRESERVE, NORTH 
              DAKOTA.

    (a) Redesignation.--The first section of the Act of March 3, 1931 
(46 Stat. 1509, chapter 439; 16 U.S.C. 674a), is amended by striking 
``Sullys Hill National Game Preserve'' and inserting ``White Horse Hill 
National Game Preserve''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 2 of the Act of March 3, 1931 
(46 Stat. 1509, chapter 439; 16 U.S.C. 674b), is amended by striking 
``Sullys Hill National Game Preserve'' and inserting ``White Horse Hill 
National Game Preserve''.
    (c) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Sullys Hill National 
Game Preserve shall be considered to be a reference to the ``White 
Horse Hill National Game Preserve''.

            Passed the Senate November 14, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 2099

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To redesignate the Sullys Hill National Game Preserve in the State of 
      North Dakota as the White Horse Hill National Game Preserve.
```