alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cr-00366-JSR Document 6-5 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cr-00366-JSR Document 6-5 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cr-00366-JSR Document 6-5 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cr-00366-JSR Document 6-5 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 4 of 4
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71851-71852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23473]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Reissuance

    Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary license has been reissued by the Federal Maritime 
Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping

[[Page 71852]]

Act of 1984, as amended by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998 (46 
U.S.C. app. 1718) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to 
the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              License No.                         Name/address                         Date reissued
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
003735FF..............................  Macro Trans Corporation, 7 Dey    September 12, 2005.
                                         Street, New York, NY 10007.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 05-23473 Filed 11-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### GLENN v. GLENN

No. 8 PC.

Case below: 53 N.C. App. 515.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 November 1981.
Case 7:07-cv-03337-CLB-MDF Document 20 Filed 02/19/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 7:07-cv-03337-CLB-MDF Document 20 Filed 02/19/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 21 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 21 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 21 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 21 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 4 of 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    UT
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      455,582
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     25,074
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         216,147
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        64,503
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 761,306
<COMMON>                                        19,423
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       37,188
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            194,607
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 251,218
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,960
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           179,363
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  92,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 236,765
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  761,306
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      193,865
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             9,393
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     163,929
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     173,322
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         20,543
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 531
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  21,074
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         4,968
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,106
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         24
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   16,082
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         5,706  
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        3,542
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         (12,929)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .92

<FN>
Capital-surplus-paid-in is net of $24,017 of treasury stock.



                                 Page 23
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. KELLER

No. 23PC

Case below: 50 NC App 364

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 April 1981. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 7 April 1981.
|   | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CNOOC Limited. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            |
|---------------------------------|
| By:                             | /s/ Fanrong Li |
|                            | Name: | Fanrong Li |
|                            | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and President |
|        |
| By:                             | /s/ Hua Zhong |
|                            | Name: | Hua Zhong |
|                            | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert N. Weingarten, Chief Financial Officer of ARTISTdirect, Inc., certify
that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ARTISTdirect, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the Evaluation Date); and c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date; 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and 6. The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: May 13, 2004 /s/ Robert N. WeingartenRobert N. WeingartenChief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8537

DAVID M. KISSI, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

GARY WILSON, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District 

Judge. (8:08-cv-01638-PJM) 

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 4, 2009 

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

David M. Kissi, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

David M. Kissi appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his civil complaint for lack of subject matter 

jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Kissi’s motion for 

appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Kissi v. Wilson, No. 8:08-cv-01638-PJM (D. Md. 

Aug. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 1-2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 1-2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 2 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 1-2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 3 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 1-2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 4 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 1-2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 5 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 1-2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 1-2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 1-2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 8 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 1-2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 9 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 1-2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 10 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 1-2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 1-2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 12 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03382-HB     Document 11      Filed 12/26/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 1 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 2 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 3 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 4 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 5 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 6 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 7 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 8 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 9 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 10 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 11 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 12 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 13 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 14 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 15 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 16 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 17 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 18 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 19 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 20 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 21 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 22 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 23 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 24 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 25 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 26 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 27 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 28 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 29 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 30 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 31 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-29 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 32 of 32
#### STATE v. HAITH

No. 35 PC

Case below: 48 N.C. App. 319

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 November 1980. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 November 1980.
#### The German National Bank, Respondent, *v.*Carnegie Trust Company et al., Appellants.

*German Nat. Bankv. Carnegie Trust Co.,*172 App. Div. 158, affirmed.

(Argued May 17, 1918;

deicded June 11, 1918.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 11, 1916, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. The respondent, the German National Bank, is a national banking corporation, doing business in the city of Cincinnati, Ohio, and the appellant, Carnegie Trust Company, up to January 7, 1911, was engaged in a banking business in the city of New York. The German National Bank and Carnegie Trust Company had entered into an agreement under which each bank was to act as agent for the other bank in its respective city for the collection of checks and drafts. Under this arrangement the respondent was to remit daily for any checks drawn on -banks in Cincinnati or contiguous territory sent to it by the Carnegie Trust Company, whether or not it had actually collected the checks. On January 3, 1911, the trust company sent *553to the plaintiff in Cincinnati for collection checks and drafts amounting to $2,955.40. Immediately upon receipt of these items and on January 5, 1911, the plaintiff mailed to the trust company its check for $2,953.92, the amount of the remitted checks less commissions. The check was received at the trust company’s office on January 7, 1911, after the superintendent of banks had taken possession of the trust company. The superintendent, finding this check in the mail, immediately caused it to be certified by the First National Bank. After suit brought by the superintendent of banks against the First National Bank on its certification the amount of the check was paid to the superintendent of banks and the plaintiff thereafter reimbursed the First National Bank. On January 7, 1911, the trust company owed the plaintiff $11,900.16 and the plaintiff owed the trust company $2,953.92, the amount of the checks and drafts remitted by the trust company for collection, thus leaving a balance of indebtedness of $8,946.24 in favor of the plaintiff against the trust company. In this action the question is whether the plaintiff bank has preserved its right to discharge its debt to the trust company by the application of the principle of equitable setoff, and whether it. can recover from the superintendent of banks the amount of the check mailed by it on January 5, 1911.

*Samuel S. Koenig*and *Oliver L. Goldsmith*for appellants.

*Joseph M. Hartfield*and *Ernest G. Fifield*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Not sitting: McLaughlin, J.
#### McANINCH v. McANINCH

No. 63 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 665.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 May 1979.
#### DUKE v. INSURANCE CO.

No. 101.

Reported: 286 N.C. 244.

Petition by plaintiff to rehear denied 4 February 1975.
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 28 Filed 01/02/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 28 Filed 01/02/2008 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                           3,040
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,184
<ALLOWANCES>                                       150
<INVENTORY>                                     19,048
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,691
<PP&E>                                          11,549
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,096
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,896
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,953
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              156
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,896
<SALES>                                         24,667
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,667
<CGS>                                           19,289
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    23
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 309
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,635
<INCOME-TAX>                                       603
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,032
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,032
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Recent News & Stories             
  -  News Releases             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## News Release

# Soldier Accounted For From Korean War (Thompson, D.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-34 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-34 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-34 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ECF CASE

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

) NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST

v. ) FOR ELECTRONIC NOTIFICATION

) 05 Cr. 369 (VM)

OSCAR WALDHEIM-TORON et al., )

)

 Defendant. )

TO: Clerk of Court

United States District Court

Southern District of New York

The undersigned attorney respectfully requests the Clerk to note his appearance in this case

and to add him as a Filing User to whom Notices of Electronic Filing will be transmitted in this case.

Respectfully submitted,

MICHAEL J. GARCIA

United States Attorney for the

Southern District of New York

By: /s/ 

Michael Q. English

Assistant United States Attorney

(212) 637-2594

Michael.English@usdoj.gov

TO: Elizabeth Fink, Esq.

Case 1:05-cr-00369-VM Document 46 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 1