alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Lancer
Orthodontics, Inc.'s third quarter 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                         101,739
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,395,899
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (97,075)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,174,319
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,580,383
<PP&E>                                       2,383,540
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,178,005)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,120,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          803,105
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    185,242
<COMMON>                                     4,701,761
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,569,888)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,120,220
<SALES>                                      4,381,358
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,381,358
<CGS>                                        2,790,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,790,957
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,677
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (83,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (83,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (83,800)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      23.1 INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S
      CONSENT**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
      Advanced BioPhotonics Inc. (A Development Stage Enterprise) on Form S-8 (File
      No. 333-123883) of our report which includes an explanatory paragraph as to
      the
      Company’s ability to continue as a going concern dated -April 9, 2007 with
      respect to our audits of the financial statements of Advanced BioPhotonics
      Inc.
      (A Development Stage Enterprise) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the
      years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the period from February 7,
      1997
      (inception) to December 31, 2006, which report is included in this Annual Report
      on Form 10-KSB of Advanced BioPhotonics Inc. (A Development Stage Enterprise)
      for the year ended December 31, 2006.


/s/
                Marcum & Kliegman LLPMelville,
                New YorkApril
                11, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 189 (Monday, October 1, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 55704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4832]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 648

[Docket No. 061109296-7009-02]
RIN 0648-XC67


Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Bluefish 
Fishery; Quota Transfer

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Temporary rule; inseason quota transfer.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS announces that State of Florida is transferring 
commercial bluefish quota to the State of New Jersey from its 2007 
quota. By this action, NMFS adjusts the quotas and announces the 
revised commercial quota for each state involved.

DATES: Effective September 26, 2007 through December 31, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Bryant, Fishery Management 
Specialist, (978) 281-9244, fax (978) 281-9135.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulations governing the Atlantic bluefish 
fishery are found at 50 CFR part 648. The regulations require annual 
specification of a commercial quota that is apportioned among the 
coastal states from Florida through Maine. The process to set the 
annual commercial quota and the percent allocated to each state is 
described in Sec.  648.160.
    Two or more states, under mutual agreement and with the concurrence 
of the Administrator, Northeast Region, NMFS (Regional Administrator), 
can transfer or combine bluefish commercial quota under Sec.  
648.160(f). The Regional Administrator is required to consider the 
criteria set forth in Sec.  648.160(f)(1) in the evaluation of requests 
for quota transfers or combinations.
    Florida has agreed to transfer 309,125 lb (140,160 kg) of its 2007 
commercial quota to New Jersey. The Regional Administrator has 
determined that the criteria set forth in Sec.  648.160(f)(1) have been 
met. The revised bluefish quotas for calendar year 2007 are: New 
Jersey, 1,579,605 lb (716,496 kg); and Florida, 553,488 lb (251,057 
kg).

Classification

    This action is taken under 50 CFR part 648 and is exempt from 
review under Executive Order 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: September 25, 2007.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 07-4832 Filed 9-26-07; 2:07 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 4 of 4
|   | 1. | The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ David L. Brown                                |   | By:    | /s/ Kevin M. Carney                                                   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | David L. Brown                                    |   |   | Kevin M. Carney                                                       |
|   | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board |   |   | Chief Financial  Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer)                     |   |   |  Officer)                                                        |

----
#### STATE v. TANT

No. 43 PC.

Case below: 16 N.C. App. 113.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 December 1972.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<CASH>                                143
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                      42,808
<ALLOWANCES>                        2,207
<INVENTORY>                       100,760
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  141,931
<PP&E>                            245,335
<DEPRECIATION>                    122,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    347,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              68,491
<BONDS>                           114,991
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                            83
<COMMON>                           54,081
<OTHER-SE>                        (40,022)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      347,504
<SALES>                           251,041
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  251,041
<CGS>                             240,139
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     245,969
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   10,538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       83
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  8,336
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (13,802)
<INCOME-TAX>                       (5,336)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (8,466)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                       (8,466)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (2.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (2.09)

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. HAMRICK

No. 166 PC.

Case below: 55 N.C. App. 132.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 30 March 1982.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1] 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that the market for the securities of Evolution Global Capital Partners, Inc. (“Evolution,” trading symbol EGCA), may be reacting to manipulative forces or deceptive practices and that there is insufficient current public information about the issuer upon which an informed investment decision may be made, particularly concerning (1) The identity of and prior securities fraud judgments against persons who appear to be involved in the offer and sale, or in connection with the purchase or sale, of Evolution shares; (2) the financial performance and business prospects of Evolution; and (3) offerings to foreign investors and any restrictions on the resale of shares. 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. 

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed company is suspended for the period of 9:30 a.m. EDT, September 24, 2007 through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on October 5, 2007. 

By the Commission. 

Nancy M. Morris,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 07-4760 Filed 9-24-07; 1:11 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
EXHIBIT 12

KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY Computation of Ratios of Earnings to
Fixed Charges (in thousands except ratio data)

|                                            | Year Ended December 31, | Twelve
Months
Ended
|------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | -------------------
|
|Fixed Charges:                              |                         |                    
|Interest on First Mortgage Bonds            |                         | $13,936            
|Interest on Other Long-term Debt            |                         | 12,188             
|Interest on Short-term Debt                 |                         | 2,455              
|Miscellaneous Interest Charges              |                         | 634                
|Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals |                         | 1,500              
|                                            |                         |                    
|Total Fixed Charges                         |                         | $30,713            
|                                            |                         |                    
|Earnings:                                   |                        
|Net Income Before Cumulative Effect         |                        
|of Accounting Change                        |                         | $21,676            
|Plus Federal Income Taxes                   |                         | 9,785              
|Plus State Income Taxes                     |                         | 2,096              
|Plus Fixed Charges (as above)               |                         | 30,713             
|                                            |                         |                    
|Total Earnings                              |                         | $64,270            
|                                            |                         |                    
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges          |                         | 2.09               
|                                            |                         |
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1833 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1833

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To transfer a bridge over the Wabash River to the New Harmony River 
Bridge Authority and the New Harmony and Wabash River Bridge Authority, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restore the Harmony Way Bridge 
Act''.

SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF BRIDGE AND LAND.

    Notwithstanding any provision of the Act of April 12, 1941 (55 
Stat. 140, chapter 71), not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the White County Bridge Commission shall convey, 
without consideration, to the New Harmony River Bridge Authority and 
the New Harmony and Wabash River Bridge Authority, any and all right, 
title, and interest of the Commission in and to the bridge across the 
Wabash River at or near New Harmony, Indiana, the approaches to the 
bridge, and the land underneath or adjacent to the bridge and the 
approaches to the bridge.

SEC. 3. REPEAL.

    The Act of April 12, 1941 (55 Stat. 140, chapter 71), is repealed 
effective on the date that the White County Bridge Commission completes 
the conveyance described in section 2.

            Passed the Senate July 17, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1833

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To transfer a bridge over the Wabash River to the New Harmony River 
Bridge Authority and the New Harmony and Wabash River Bridge Authority, 
                        and for other purposes.
```
#### STATE v. BUFF

No. 91 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 395.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 29 March 1977.
#### IN RE DUKE POWER CO.

No. 20 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 138.

Petition by High Rock Lake Assoc, for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 1978. Motion of Utilities Commission and Duke Power Co. to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 October 1978.
Andrew S.



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

May 6, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00175

- CV

TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

, Appellant

v.

Andrew S. MCGAHEY

, Appellee

From the 131st Judicial Distric t Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 12185 Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Texas Mutual Insurance Company appeals the trial court’s orders on cross

- motions for summary judgment signed February 27, 2015. Our review of the clerk’s record raises questions regarding our jurisdiction over this appeal.

A summary judgment order “ is final for purposes of appeal if and only if either it actually disposes of all claims and parties then before the court

... or it states with unmistakable clarity that it is a final judgment as to all claims and all parties. Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 192

- 93 (Tex. 2001). The record before us reflects that Texas Mutual Insurance Company

sued Andrew S. McGahey and the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation, seeking review of a f inal decision of the workers’ compensation division awarding income benefits to McGahey and seeking a declaratory judgment regarding the Department’s interpretation and application of a section of the Texas Labor Code

. Texas Mutual

filed a motion for summ ary judgment . The Department filed a plea to the jurisdiction, and both the Department and McGahey filed cross motion s for summary judgment

. The trial court referred the case to an associate judge. The record contains a handwritten associate judge’s

rep ort that indicates the judge’s rulings would be rendered in separate signed orders. Our record contains two orders signed on February 27, 2015 : an order that denies Texas Mutual’s motion for summary judgment and an order that grants McGahey’s motion for s ummary judgment

. However, neither order expressly disposes of any issue or party in the case and neither order contains any finality language. Moreover, although McGahe y ’s motion for summary judgment prayed for attorney’s fees and costs, the order granti ng his motion for summary judgment doesnot dispose of the claims for fees and costs. Finally, nothing in the record before us purports to dispose o f Texas Mutual’s claims against the Dep artment.

We therefore order appellant to show cause in writing to this court no later than May 21,

2015 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If a supplemental clerk ’ s record is required to demonstrate our jurisdi ction, appellant must (a) ask the trial court clerk to prepare the record, and (b) notify this court that such a request was made. If necessar y, the court will entertain a motion to briefly abate the appeal to allow the trial court to sign a final judgmen t,
if suc h was the trial court’s intent. We further order the appellate deadlines suspended until

further order of this court.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 6th day of May, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 16, 2013

NO. 03

- 11

- 00065

- CV

CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC, Appellant

v.

Public Utility Commission of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVI S COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, RO SE, AND GOODWIN

REVERSED AND REMANDED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS , having

heard this cause on appeal and having considered the record of the court below, the briefs, and

counsels’ argument, concludes that the district court’s judgment should be reversed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED , in accordance with the Court’s opinion, that:

(1) The judgment of the district court is reversed;

(2) The parts of the Public Utility Commission’s order regarding CenterPoint’s

2008 performance bonus and carrying costs are reversed;

(3) The cause is remanded to the Public Utility Commission for further

proceedings consistent with this Court’s opinion;

(4) The Public Utility Commission pay all costs relate d to this appeal; and

(5) This decision be certified below for observance.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Edward D. Segal, Chief Executive Officer of Metron Technology N.V. (the "Company"), and Douglas J. McCutcheon, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of this 11th day of August, 2004.

|/s/EDWARD D. SEGALEdward D. Segal,
Chief Executive Officer             |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/DOUGLAS J. MCCUTCHEONDouglas J. McCutcheon,
Chief Financial Officer |  | 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of Metron Technology N.V. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
#### STATE v. HALL

No. 269 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 492.

Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 October 1981. Motion of defendant to dismiss appeal for lack of significant public interest allowed 6 October 1981.