alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed 11/2/22 P. v. Coleman CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

DARRICK ANTHONY COLEMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

 D079958

 (Super. Ct. No. SCD280153)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, 

Laura W. Halgren, Judge. Affirmed. 

Jason Szydlik, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for 

Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. 

Darrick Anthony Coleman pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by 

a felon (Pen. Code,1 § 29800, subd. (a)(1)) and admitted a prior strike (§ 667, 

subds. (b)-(i)). The remaining charge and allegations were dismissed. 

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code.
2

The court denied Coleman’s motion to dismiss the strike prior. 

(People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497.) The court 

sentenced Coleman to the mid-term of two years, doubled because of the prior 

strike. 

Coleman filed a timely notice of appeal challenging matters occurring 

after the plea. 

Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 

25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), indicating counsel has not been able to identify any 

arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Counsel asks the court to review the 

record for error as mandated by Wende. We offered Coleman the opportunity 

to file his own brief on appeal but, he has not responded.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

This appeal is from a guilty plea. Coleman admitted he possessed a 

firearm as a convicted felon. 

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks 

the court to review the record. To assist the court in its review, and in 

compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel 

has identified the following possible issues which were considered in 

evaluating the potential merits of this appeal:

1. Did the court err in denying Coleman’s motion to strike the prior 

conviction (Romero motion)?

2. Did the court err in accepting Coleman’s guilty plea when he was 

not physically present in court?

We have reviewed the entire record as required by Wende and Anders. 

We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. 

Competent counsel has represented Coleman on this appeal.
3

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

O’ROURKE, J.

BUCHANAN, J.
#### ADVERTISING CO. v. BRADSHAW, SEC. OF TRANSPORTATION

No. 12 PC

Case below: 48 N.C. App. 10

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 November 1980. Motion of defendant to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 November 1980.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2009 

d1019 

Order 

 

October 26, 2009 

136566 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136566 

 COA: 281537 

Wayne CC: 07-003404 

LEMAN DOUGLAS HARRIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of February 4, 2009, the application for leave to appeal the April 24, 

2008 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People 

v Jackson (Docket No. 135888). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on 

July 10, 2009, 483 Mich 271 (2009), the application is again considered, and it is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed 

by this Court.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Philip Services Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
L. Knauss, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Robert L. Knauss
-------------------------------

Robert L. Knauss
Principal Executive Officer
April 15, 2003
### r^L; unc^satfj u/^air&A/V,.&--£*e/tu^^gii ttoh 15 rC/lA/ft. ftD»/A82-/tf CQ/j/l/o' 0^/3'^337-Cg

/

### 'cJednCouriC^e..Ni. te-07- 07437-g^ RLFDIN /l^r>fjhfe Qco%T/y_

- C/ert^ RECEIVE6Wt dF'cAnal appeals COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEAR j g 20|5S 

### 2)(?.Ar /))r /^/g. f)costq; MAR 16ZUW Abe) Acosta, Clerk Abel Aflosta. Clerk 

### O// fl) o fornXt O OS /e//e.rjV/or/r^eei Ofo<j. /frsT c^V^ ' /?Art/ Afof rft nit fcrmnure. tuifh) rAg kurorfr)*.lbJ*M.-Qif*k

### 7)e.*y-«J(*«A>£ of^-/^e Ce>a,ri, Q/sfi"f /)/)e KbTt/^s /& Arre ^i ^a/ueK Q^(/e Q< 

### \S<*-/C T)<ze,t>^> thou.j5,/€T}ju>&®1^/^a/oA rVj^A^sA Qu/ o/la
H/a/o o/v a// 

### Vt^aAj ry^njs 

### k,ecasjs& its spQr&fcrtftMcd ?f iztY&cJ ^se^U'- Q&/^~<3 U^r o&gA »> *?> /vi &r c^fe geg@/
iii

### ^/edfe_r CJsOpP^r" ujdk //As Argys€^ feq Me SfU,



## C Ae.n^o .. //./W tfatih^ilui^shfejlcjoj^.ti'lrj ^.mti^^^jh oTle^fIn- Artci g-/cT) hss-cJi t ccJlWJ *r&f-i^*/au)'nba-atQ;re cur^f A t! Dj)t aJ^s, «Sa /^m Qat]<A/e; ^ Coci^r re>q^%) f •j&m^iai csi rtJLex .? Gv/i* / • I'll • &" u'^ '' ^ J/ a 

### '2jrtipj rjreA otf^e^e o/r--*^S *£r& B^Jcl.U^^cJfCtisr ^itd

T<rr f$ iS^/^ /^> 00 ^OC7\ llr^f^l pitted A^g/ j00S€Sg*e-fi'/]&tte ®*f rr\K* $>&r$6M fkejcd t-ftO} (*£ tA^s old fffif&itl)G<j@ (J&£cq*icet?. 

### P^e»jse/^V^^o*r/'-/ittfPDf^6oJaA&»w</^jf, __)<v ./, /^«are/^cft <^c/tt>i)r^ ^/%C.f)&&d GsofS/essli®^ $//
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK     Document 27      Filed 07/19/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK     Document 27      Filed 07/19/2007     Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 1 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 2 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 3 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 4 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 5 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 6 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 7 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 8 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 9 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 10 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 11 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 12 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 13 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 14 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 15 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 16 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 17 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 18 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 19 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 20 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 21 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 22 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 23 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 24 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 25 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 26 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 27 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 28 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 29 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 30 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 31 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 32 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-26 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 33 of 33
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk January 25, 2013

s0122 

# Order

January 25, 2013

145898

EDWARD GOLDBERG and MARIETTE

GOLDBERG,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v SC: 145898

COA: 301439

Wayne CC: 09

- 009067

- NH

JOHN WLEZNIAK, M.D., MARIO PASTORES,

R.N., and ST. MARY HOSPITAL OF LIVONIA,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 21, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 15 – Awareness Letter of Deloitte & Touche LLP










July 20, 2009





North American Galvanizing & Coatings, Inc.


5314 South Yale Avenue


Suite 1000


Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135





We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of North American
Galvanizing & Coatings, Inc. and subsidiary for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, as indicated in our report dated July 20, 2009; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.





We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, is incorporated by reference in
Registration Statements No. 333-133848 on Form S-8 and No. 333-61393 on Form S-3 of North American Galvanizing & Coatings, Inc. (formerly Kinark Corporation).





We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or
certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.











/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





Tulsa, Oklahoma
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2098 

To amend the Revised Statutes to grant State attorneys general the ability 

to issue subpoenas to investigate suspected violations of State laws that 

are applicable to national banks. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 11, 2019 

Mr. SCHUMER (for Ms. HARRIS (for herself, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Ms. WARREN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, and Mr. MERKLEY)) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Revised Statutes to grant State attorneys 

general the ability to issue subpoenas to investigate suspected violations of State laws that are applicable to 

national banks. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Accountability for Wall 

5 Street Executives Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2098 IS

1 SEC. 2. VISITORIAL POWERS. 

2 The sixth undesignated paragraph of section 5240 of 

3 the Revised Statutes (12 U.S.C. 484) is amended by strik4 ing subparagraph (B) and inserting the following: 

5 ‘‘(B) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A)— 

6 ‘‘(i) lawfully authorized State auditors and 

7 examiners may, at reasonable times and upon 

8 reasonable notice to a bank, review their 

9 records solely to ensure compliance with appli10 cable State unclaimed property or escheat laws 

11 upon reasonable cause to believe that the bank 

12 has failed to comply with such laws; 

13 ‘‘(ii) an attorney general (or other chief 

14 law enforcement officer) of a State may issue 

15 subpoenas to national banks or officers of na16 tional banks based upon reasonable cause to be17 lieve that the national bank or an officer of a 

18 national bank has failed to comply with applica19 ble State laws; and 

20 ‘‘(iii) an attorney general (or other chief 

21 law enforcement officer) of a State may require 

22 a national bank to provide aggregate data on 

23 loans and other financial products and services 

24 provided by the national bank in such State.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Keystone
Consolidated Industries, Inc.'s consolidated financial statements for the six
months ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                       648
<INVENTORY>                                     35,834
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,746
<PP&E>                                         271,333
<DEPRECIATION>                                 176,680
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 310,458
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          111,975
<BONDS>                                         15,306
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,994
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,616
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   310,458
<SALES>                                        192,381
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               192,823
<CGS>                                          170,592
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  170,592
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,061
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   179
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,736
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,255
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,284
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,971
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,971
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 7 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 7 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 23.1


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Ivax Diagnostics, Inc.
 (formerly b2bstores.com, Inc.)
Miami, Florida

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed Form
S-8 Registration Statement (No. 333-48316) of our report dated March 8, 2001,
except for Note 1 as to which the date is March 14, 2001, relating to the
financial statements of Ivax Diagnostics, Inc. (formerly b2bstores.com, Inc.),
appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 21, 2000.


/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

New York, New York
March 22, 2001
#### STATE v. VICKERS

No. 3 PC.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 282.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 30 August 1974.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (the Company) for the period ended July 31, 2011, I, D. Michael Parker, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended July 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended July 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 14, 2011



/s/ D. Michael ParkerD. Michael ParkerSenior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
#### LIGHT AND WATER COMRS. v. SANITARY DISTRICT

No. 151 PC

Case below: 49 NC App 421

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 27 January 1981.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

# ACTION: 

Notice of Partially Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

# TIME AND PLACE:

Thursday, September 27, 2007 at 9:30 a.m. The meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.

# OPEN AGENDA ITEM:

PEFCO Secured Note Issues Resolutions.

# PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:

The meeting will be open to public participation for Item No. 1 only.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Office of the Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571 (Telephone 202-565-3957).

Howard A. Schweitzer,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 07-4758  Filed 9-24-07; 12:00 pm]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
#### LYNCH v. CONSTRUCTION CO.

No. 188 PC.

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 127.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 September 1979.
Case 1:07-cv-03553-VM Document 8 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03553-VM Document 8 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03553-VM Document 8 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in the  Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-88687,  333-38766,  333-38768,  333-38874,
333-71944,  333-92391,  333-92409,  333-59096  and  333-101965)  of VA  Software
Corporation  of our report  dated  August 20,  2003,  relating to the  financial
statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
October 14, 2003


                                       64
#### STATE v. HOOKER

No. 119 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 457.

Application by defendant for further review denied 29 December 1978.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 2033

ANA Y MARTINEZ HERNANDEZ

P etitioner
,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND
, Attorney General
, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : April 20, 2023 Decided: June 1, 2023

Before WILKINSON and AGEE
, Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

ON BRIEF: Robert J. Harris
, Woodbridge, V irginia, for Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton , Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
, Daniel E. Goldman
, Senior Litigation Counsel, Robbin K. Blaya
, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent

.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-2033 Doc: 26 Filed: 06/01/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:

Ana Martinez Hernandez (Martinez) , a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions
for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to

reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and Martinez’s claims and find

no abuse of discretion. See Na rine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009); Jean v.

Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review
for the reasons stated by the Board

. See In re Martinez Hernandez (B.I.A. Sept. 1, 2022).
We dispense wi th oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED USCA4 Appeal: 22-2033 Doc: 26 Filed: 06/01/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
__________ 

__________ 

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE 

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING 

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

The State, Respondent, 

v. 

Jeffrey S. Evans, Petitioner. 

Appellate Case No. 2010-180746 

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS 

Appeal from Anderson County 

Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court Judge 

Memorandum Opinion No. 2012-MO-037 

Heard October 2, 2012 – Filed October 10, 2012 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED 

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of South 

Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, of Columbia, 

for Petitioner. 

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney 

General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy 

Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Deputy 

Attorney General David A. Spencer, all of Columbia, 
and, Solicitor Christina T. Adams, of Anderson, for 

Respondent. 

PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the 

court of appeals affirming the Petitioner's convictions. We now dismiss the 

writ as improvidently granted. 

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., 

concur.