alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark Bristow, Acting Chief Executive Officer of Rockwell Diamonds Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 20-F/A2 of the Company for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | By:    | /s/ M. Bristow                
| | ------ | ------------------------------
| |        |                               
| |        |                               
| | Name:  | Mark Bristow                  
| | Title: | Acting Chief Executive Officer
| | Date:  | January 28, 2011              

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F. A2 signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

---
Exhibit 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Keystone  Consolidated  Industries,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bert
E. Downing,  Jr.,  Vice  President and  Corporate  Controller  (Chief  Financial
Officer) of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



/s/  Bert E. Downing, Jr.

Bert E. Downing, Jr.
Vice President and Corporate Controller (Chief Financial Officer)
August 14, 2002
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 8 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 8 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 8 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 8 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 4 of 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-25-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,045
<ALLOWANCES>                                       152
<INVENTORY>                                      3,194
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,372
<PP&E>                                           1,804
<DEPRECIATION>                                     451
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,850
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,373
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           172
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,851
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,850
<SALES>                                         21,794
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,794
<CGS>                                           20,422
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (51)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 136
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,561)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,561)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,561)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.36)
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03551-RWS     Document 8      Filed 11/06/2007     Page 1 of 1
#### DUKE v. INSURANCE CO.

No. 51 PC.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 392.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 24 September 1974.
#### Vermont Marble Company, Appellant, *v.*Chas. M. Gray Marble and Slate Company, Respondent, Impleaded with Others.

*Vermont Marble Co.*v. *Gray Marble & Slate Co.,*171 App. Div. 954, 955, affirmed.

(Submitted October 25, 1918;

decided November 12, 1918.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Cpurt in the first judicial department, entered January 13, 1916, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon verdict directed "by the court, Also appeal from an order of the said Appellate Division, entered January 11, 1916, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to reopen the case. The complaint alleged a cause of action on a promissory note, made and delivered by the respondent Chas. M. Gray Marble and Slate Company, for value received, to the order of the defendant Feeney & Devanny Company, payable three months after date, and thereafter and before maturity, for value received, indorsed by Feeney & Devanny Company and Patrick H. Feeney and delivered to the plaintiff," appellant, which at maturity was unpaid and protested for non-payment. The answer of respondent Chas. M. Gray Marble and Slate Company, after making certain denials, sets up four separate defenses: (1) Payment; (2) payment to the Feeney & Devanny Company with appellant’s consent and authority; (3) that after the note was protested, appellant charged it back to *676the defendant Feeney & Devanny Company, and that in June, 1913, there was an áecounting had between appellant and Feeney & Devanny Company, whereby an agreed balance was struck, and found to be due appellant, which balance included certain protested notes, the note in suit, and an amount due for merchandise on an open account, and that appellant agreed to, and did, accept in payment and full settlement and discharge of said indebtedness three promissory notes made or indorséd by the Feeney & Devanny Company, and indorsed by defendant Patrick H. Feeney, all dated June 12, 1913, maturing in one, two and three months, respectively, from date; that it was agreed between the defendant Feeney & Devanny Company and appellant that the note in suit should form a part of the consideration of the three notes referred to, and that their acceptance should be in full payment, settlement, satisfaction and discharge of the note in suit, and other protested notes indorsed and delivered by the Feeney & Devanny Company to plaintiff and for merchandise due on open account. The defendants Feeney & Devanny Company and Patrick H. Feeney did not defend.

*Merritt E. Haviland*for appellant.

*W. Bennett Marx*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.. Appeal from order denying motion to reopen case dismissed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback and Hogan, JJ. Not sitting: McLaughlin, J. Absent: Crane, J.
## NO. 12-09-00121-CR
IN THE COUR T OF APP EALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APP EALS D ISTRICT

TYLER, TEX AS

§ IN RE: DA V

IDGE OR GE

BAU GH , RELATOR § ORIGINAL PROCEE DING §
MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION PER CU RIAM David Ge org e B augh seeks r elea se fr om his confinement in the Cherokee County J ail. He complains that the trial cour t has ref used to r elea se him on a per sonal rec ognizance bond pending trial despite his proven indig ence
. Bau gh h as designate d his request for relief as an “ Emerg ency

Petition for Writof Mandamus.” H oweve r, it is the substance of a docume nt that gove rns, and not the title. Ex p arte Cal dwell , 58 S.W .3d 127, 130 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). Ba ugh is, in eff

ect, seekingpretria l habea s relief . There fore , we co n s t ru e t h e filed docume nt as an a pplication for a

pretria l writ of habe as corpus. Th e Te xas G ov e rnme nt C od e pr ov ide s a s f oll ow s:

C o ncurrent l y wi t h t he suprem e co urt , t he co urt of ap p e a ls o f a co urt of ap p eal s d i st ri ct i n whi ch a p ers o n i s res t rai ned i n hi s l i b ert y , or a jus t i ce o f t he co urt of ap p eal s, m ay i ss ue a wri t of hab eas corp us wh en i t a ppea r s t h at t h e r es t r ai n t of l i ber t y i s by v i r t u e of

a n or der , pr oce s s , or c ommi t men t i s s u ed by
a cou r t or j u dg e bec au s e of t h e v i ol at i on of an or der , j u dg men t , or de cr ee pr ev i ou s l y ma de, r en der ed, or e n t er ed by t h e cou r t or j u dge i n a c i v i l c as e. Pen di n g t h e h ea r i n g of a n a ppl i ca t i on f

or a w r i t of h a b e a s c o rp u s, the c o u rt o f ap p e a ls o r a ju stice o f t h e c o u rt o f ap p e a ls m a y a d m it to b a il a p e rs o n to wh om t h e wr i t of

h abe as c or pu s ma y be g r an t ed.

T EX
. G OV ' T C ODE ANN . § 22.221(d) ( Ver non 2004). Thus, the orig inal jur i s d i ct i o n of cour ts of2

app e a l s t o i s s u e a wr i t o f h a b e a s c o r p u s i s l i m i t e d t o th o s e c a s e s i n wh i c h a p e r s o n ' s l i b e rty is restra ined bec ause the person has violated an or der, judgment, or dec ree enter ed in a c ivil case. Id. Conseque ntl y , c o urts o f a p p e a ls d o n o t h av e o r ig in a l h a b e a s c o r p u s ju r is d ic ti o n in c r im in a l law

matters. Dods on v

. St ate , 988 S.W .2d 833, 835 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1999, no pet.); Ex p arte Hawkin s , 885 S.W .2d 586, 588 (Tex. App.–El Paso 1994, no pet.). In such matters, the ir jurisdiction is appellate only

. Dodson , 98 8 S

. W

. 2 dat 835. B eca use B augh seeks ha

beas r elief in a

n orig inal proce eding , we a

re w ithout jurisdi ction to c onsider his a pplication. Acc ording ly , we dis miss Bau gh 's application for

want of jurisdiction. Opinion delivere d J une 17, 2009. P an elconsi s t ed of

W ort hen, C. J. , G r i

f f i t h, J. , and H oyl e, J.

(DO N OT PUBL I SH)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                            290,912
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   7,080,344
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                    26,125,051
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               33,527,554
<PP&E>                                          1,009,326
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 34,536,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,811,979
<BONDS>                                        29,667,572
<COMMON>                                           88,741
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      2,057,329
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   34,536,880
<SALES>                                         9,080,994
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                9,636,151
<CGS>                                           6,679,329
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   8,355,962
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                413,530
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,280,189
<INCOME-TAX>                                      486,088
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               794,101
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      794,101
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .89
        








</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 29, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 71608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23447]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Office of Research and Development


Government Owned Invention Available for Licensing

AGENCY: Office of Research and Development, VA.

ACTION:  Notice of Government Owned Invention Available for Licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The invention listed below is owned by the U.S. government as 
represented by the Department of Veterans Affairs, and is available for 
licensing in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 207 and 37 CFR part 404 and/or 
Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADA) Collaboration 
under 15 U.S.C. 3710a to achieve expeditious commercialization of 
results of Federally-funded research and development. Foreign patents 
are filed on selected inventions to extend market coverage for U.S. 
companies and may also be available for licensing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Technical and licensing information on 
the invention may be obtained by writing to: Amy E. Centanni, 
Department of Veterans Affairs, Director, Technology Transfer Program, 
Office of Research and Development, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20420; fax: 202-254-0255; e-mail at: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ea8b8793c4898f849e8b848483aa878b8386c49c8bc48d859c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="86e7ebffa8e5e3e8f2e7e8e8efc6ebe7efeaa8f0e7a8e1e9f0">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Any request for information should include the Number and Title for 
the relevant invention as indicated below. Issued patents may be 
obtained from the Commissioner of Patents, U.S. Patent and Trademark 
Office, Washington, DC 20231.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The invention available for licensing is: 
U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/690,696 ``Compositions and 
Methods for Osteogenic Gene therapy.''

    Dated: November 22, 2005.
Gordon H. Mansfield,
Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 05-23447 Filed 11-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Presidential Documents

54807 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 186 

Wednesday, September 26, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8177 of September 20, 2007 

National POW/MIA Recognition Day, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

America has been blessed by the brave men and women of our Armed 

Forces who have answered the call to defend our country and protect 

liberty around the world. On National POW/MIA Recognition Day, we honor 

a special group of patriots: those who have been prisoners of war and 

those who are still missing in action. We remain forever in their debt, 

and we renew our commitment to them and to their families never to 

rest until we have accounted for every missing service member. 

To commemorate this day, the National League of Families POW/MIA flag 

is flown over the White House, the Capitol, the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, 

the Korean War Veterans Memorial, the World War II Memorial, and other 

locations across our country. This flag is an enduring symbol that reflects 

our solemn commitment to our courageous service members who have been 

imprisoned while serving in conflicts around the world and to those who 

remain missing. America will always remember these heroes, and we underscore our pledge to achieve the fullest possible accounting for every missing 

member of our Armed Forces. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim Friday, September 21, 

2007, as National POW/MIA Recognition Day. I call upon the people of 

the United States to join me in honoring and remembering all former American prisoners of war and those missing in action who valiantly served 

our great country. I also call upon Federal, State, and local government 

officials and private organizations to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRD0
54808 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 26, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day 

of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtysecond. 

[FR Doc. 07–4766 

Filed 9–25–07; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRD0GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document









































 
 

  Exhibit 10.3    
    


         

  


December 26,
2008 


Timothy
Bixler 


Dear
Tim: 


        Reference
is made to the (change-in-control) Severance Agreement entered into by and between you and International Rectifier Corporation (the
"Severance Agreement"). 


        The
purpose of this letter is to supplement the terms of the Severance Agreement to include terms and conditions designed to make any payments pursuant to the Severance Agreement
compliant with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (including the Treasury Regulations and other published guidance related thereto)
("Section 409A"). 


        Your
Severance Agreement is hereby modified as follows; capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Severance Agreement: 


        1.    Severance.    Subject to the conditions of payment described in Section 10 relating to specified
employees, any Cash Severance payable pursuant to Section 2(b) of the Severance Agreement shall be paid in a cash lump sum on the 60th day following your "separation from
service," provided you have promptly executed and delivered (and not revoked) a Release Agreement within 50 days of your termination; provided, however, that if you fail to execute and deliver
such release, or you revoke such release, you shall not be paid any Cash Severance pursuant to the Severance Agreement. For this purpose, a "separation from service" shall be defined within the
meaning of Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(h)(1), without regard to the optional alternative definitions available thereunder. 


        Except
as modified hereby, your Severance Agreement remains unmodified. Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing by signing where indicated below. 


Regards,



INTERNATIONAL
RECTIFIER CORPORATION



By:

Its: Assistant Secretary 


Acknowledged
and agreed: 



	
	 
	





  Timothy Bixler













QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.3
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 4 Filed 08/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 4 Filed 08/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

Morris Ackerman, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

- against - 

Collins & Aikman Corporation, et al., 

Defendants. 

 

Case No.: 05 CV 05098 (MBM) 

APPEARANCE

ECF CASE 

To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record: 

Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for defendant Collins & Aikman 

Corporation. 

I certify that I am admitted to practice in this court. 

Dated: November, 28, 2005 

 /S/ 

Vickie Reznik (VR 1897) 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

Citigroup Center 

153 East 53rd Street 

New York, New York 10022-4611 

Telephone: (212) 446-4800 

Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 

Attorneys for Defendant Collins & Aikman 

Corporation 

Case 1:05-cv-05098-MBM Document 10 Filed 11/28/2005 Page 1 of 1
#### DIXON v. KINSER and KINSER v. DIXON

No. 106 PC.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 94.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 12 January 1982.
Exhibit 10.1


 





FIRST AMENDMENT TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment
to Employment Agreement (“Amendment”) is entered into as of March 25, 2020 (the “Effective Date”),
by and between Deluxe Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, whose address is 3680 Victoria Street North, Shoreview, MN 55126 (the
 “Company”), and Barry C. McCarthy, an individual (“Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement effective October 14, 2018 (the “Agreement”).


 


WHEREAS, in response
to the potential effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on Deluxe’s revenue, the Company has decided to reduce Executive Leadership
Team members’ base salaries by 20% during the second calendar quarter of 2020;


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and Executive would like to amend the Agreement to temporarily reduce Executive’s Base Salary, as defined in the Agreement
and in effect on the date this Amendment is executed, for the second calendar quarter of 2020; and


 


WHEREAS, this Amendment
shall supplement the Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, as
of the Effective Date, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


 


1.     
Executive’s Base Salary, as defined in the Agreement, shall be temporarily reduced by 20 percent for the second quarter
of 2020, starting April 1, 2020 and through June 30, 2020 (the “Temporary Pay Reduction”).


 


2.     Any
Incentive Pay or Payments Upon Termination, as defined in the Agreement, provided to Executive will be calculated based on Executive’s
regular Base Salary, without regard to the Temporary Pay Reduction.


 


3.     
The Agreement remains unchanged except as set forth in this Amendment.


 


IN WITNESS THEREFORE,
the undersigned have executed this First Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the date set forth above.


 


	DELUXE CORPORATION 	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/ Jeffrey L. Cotter	 	/s/ Barry C. McCarthy
	By Jeffrey L. Cotter	 	Barry C. McCarthy
	Its: Chief Administrative Officer