alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. SORRELLS

No. 196 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 374.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 August 1977.
#### STATE v. LITTLE

No. 290A82.

Case below: 56 N.C. App. 765.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 13 July 1982.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

    CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of North American
Galvanizing & Coatings, Inc. (the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the
Company.


                               NORTH AMERICAN GALVANIZING & COATINGS, INC.
                               -------------------------------------------
                                              (Registrant)



Date:  August 13, 2004                         /s/ Paul R. Chastain
                                               ---------------------------
                                               Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer
                                               (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Bontan Corporation Inc.. for the year ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bontan Corporation Inc.








Date:  July 29, 2011








/s/ Kam Shah





Kam Shah


Chief Executive Officer  and Chief Financial Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130663 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130663 COA: 266476 Wayne CC: 04-007491-01 ERIC CREIGHTON JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 23, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t0619 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2006

Clerk
Case 1:07-cr-00371-PKC Document 10 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cr-00371-PKC Document 10 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cr-00371-PKC Document 10 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cr-00371-PKC Document 10 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cr-00371-PKC Document 10 Filed 06/09/2008 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03521-DAB     Document 6      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 1 of 1
Norman C. Kleinberg 

Theodore V. H. Mayer 

William J. Beausoleil 

HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP 

One Battery Park Plaza 

New York, NY 10004-1482 

(212) 837-6000 

Paul F Strain 

David J. Heubeck 

VENABLE LLP 

750 E. Pratt Street 

Suite 900 

Baltimore, MD 21202 

(410) 244-7400 

Attorneys for Defendant Merck & Co., Inc.

-----------------------------------------------------x 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

-----------------------------------------------------x 

IN RE: 

Fosamax Products Liability Litigation 1:06-md-01789 (JFK) 

-----------------------------------------------------x 

This Document Relates to ALL CASES NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

-----------------------------------------------------x 

TO: Attorney Admission Clerk and All Other Parties 

 Pursuant to Local Rule 1.3 of this Court, please take notice of the following attorney 

information change for Venable LLP. The mailing address for the Venable attorneys listed 

below should be changed to: 750 E. Pratt Street, Suite 900, Baltimore, MD 21202. All phone 

numbers, fax numbers and e-mail addresses for these attorneys remain the same. 

Paul F. Strain 

David J. Heubeck 

Christina L. Gaarder 

James E. Gray 

Case 1:07-cv-03459-JFK Document 33 Filed 06/02/2008 Page 1 of 3
Kathleen Sullivan Hardway 

M. King Hill, III 

Michael B. MacWilliams 

Stephen E. Marshall 

Randolph S. Sergent 

Craig A. Thompson 

All are Pro Hac Vice attorneys. 

Dated: June 2, 2008 

 New York, New York Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ 

Paul F. Strain 

VENABLE LLP 

750 E. Pratt Street 

Suite 900 

Baltimore, MD 21202 

(410) 244-7400 

Fax: (410) 244-7742 

pfstrain@venable.com 

2 

Case 1:07-cv-03459-JFK Document 33 Filed 06/02/2008 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on June 2, 2008, the foregoing NOTICE OF CHANGE OF 

ADDRESS was filed electronically and served electronically, pursuant to the Court's Case 

Management Order via the Court's CM/ECF system. 

 /s/ 

Paul F. Strain 

VENABLE LLP 

750 E. Pratt Street 

Suite 900 

Baltimore, MD 21202 

(410) 244-7400 

Fax: (410) 244-7742 

pfstrain@venable.com 

3 

Case 1:07-cv-03459-JFK Document 33 Filed 06/02/2008 Page 3 of 3
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: THERESA CABALLERO,

 Relator.

'

'

'

'

No. 08-13-00069-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The court has considered this cause on the Relator=s petition for writ of mandamus 

against the Honorable George D. Gilles, Presiding Judge of the 448th District Court of El Paso, 

Texas, and conditionally grants relief, in accordance with the opinion of this court. The writ will 

issue only if the trial court fails to comply with this opinion.

All costs herein having been paid, no further order is made with respect thereto.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 23RD DAY OF APRIL, 2014.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice 

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, J., and Barajas, C.J. (Senior Judge)

Barajas, C.J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
| By/s/David L.      Cheek                              David      L. CheekPresident      and Chief Executive OfficerMay      6, 2009 | By/s/  Bert E. Downing,      Jr.                       Bert      E. Downing, Jr.Vice      President, Chief Financial Officer,Corporate      Controller and TreasurerMay      6, 2009 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC     Document 5      Filed 06/26/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC     Document 5      Filed 06/26/2007     Page 2 of 2
American Tissue Inc.

Calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

Amounts in 000s

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                               1996       1997       1998        1999         2000
                                             --------   --------   --------    --------     --------
<S>                                            <C>         <C>       <C>         <C>          <C>
Pretax income from
continuing operations ..................       13,182      6,873     (1,474)     18,883       24,483
Fixed charges ..........................       10,077     14,070     17,496      20,622       37,620
Less: Interest capitalized .............           --         --        599         966        1,100
                                             --------   --------   --------    --------     --------
Earnings ...............................       23,259     20,943     15,423      38,539       61,003
                                             --------   --------   --------    --------     --------
Fixed charges ..........................       10,077     14,070     17,496      20,622       37,620

Ratio ..................................          2.3        1.5        (a)         1.9          1.6
                                                 times      times                  times        times
Calculation of Fixed Charges:
Interest expense .......................        9,175     12,272     14,672      17,058       31,318
Capitalized interest ...................           --         --        599         966        1,100
Amortization of deferred
debt costs .............................          355      1,128      1,537       1,161        1,810
Estimated interest portion of
rent expense ...........................          547        670        688       1,137        3,392
                                             --------   --------   --------    --------     --------
                                               10,077     14,070     17,496      20,622       37,620
                                             --------   --------   --------    --------     --------
</TABLE>

     (a) Earnings during fiscal year 1998 were insufficient to cover fixed
charges by $2,073.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    In accordance with § 271.25 of its rules regarding availability of information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below the domestic policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market Committee at its meeting held on November 20, 2005.[1] 

The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. to further its long-run objectives, the Committee in the immediate future seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with increasing the federal funds rate to an average of around 4 percent.

The vote encompassed approval of the paragraph below for inclusion in the statement to be released shortly after the meeting:

The Committee perceives that, with appropriate monetary policy action, the upside and downside risks to the attainment of both sustainable growth and price stability should be kept roughly equal. With underlying inflation expected to be contained, the Committee believes that policy accommodation can be removed at a pace that is likely to be measured. Nonetheless, the Committee will respond to changes in economic prospects as needed to fulfill its obligation to maintain price stability.

By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, November 28, 2005.

Vincent R. Reinhart,

Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.

# Footnotes

1.                             Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee Meeting on November 1, 2005, which includes the domestic policy directive issued at the meeting, are available upon request to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551. The minutes are published in the Federal Reserve Bulletin and in the Board's annual report.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 05-23622 Filed 12-2-05; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-M
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of IVAX Diagnostics, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin D. Clark, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  March 30, 2011





/s/ Kevin D. ClarkKevin D. Clark,Principal Executive Officer
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 98-30755

Summary Calendar

BEN CHARLES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC 97-CV-1406

April 14, 1999

Before WISDOM, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The plaintiff-appellant, Ben Charles, appeals the district court’s judgment that the

Commissioner of Social Security properly denied his claim for disability and supplemental security

income benefits. Charles first applied for these benefits in February 1991, on the basis that he

became disabled in June 1986 as a result of an injury to his right hand. On appeal, Charles argues

that the (1) administrative law judge (ALJ) assigned to this case did not afford proper weight to a

psychologist’s opinions regarding his mental status; (2) ALJ denied him due process of law by

failing to issue a subpoena compelling the presence of the Commissioner’s consulting

psychologist; (3) ALJ improperly expunged the consulting psychologist’s report from the record;
 

1 Anthony v. Sullivan, 954 F.2d 289, 292 (5th Cir. 1992).

 

2 Villa v. Sullivan, 895 F.2d 1019, 1022 (5th Cir. 1990).

 

3 See Charles v. Apfel, No. 97-CV-1406 (W.D. La. May 27, 1998).

2

(4) ALJ’s step 5 hypothetical questions to the vocational expert were defective; (5) vocational

expert’s step 4 responses to the ALJ’s step 5 questions were defective; and (6) ALJ’s introduction

of Charles’s vocational factors into the hypothetical questions posed to the vocational expert

propelled the sequential evaluation process into step 5, thereby requiring alternative or “other”

work testimony from the vocational expert to carry the Commissioner’s step 5 burden. Charles

further argues that the Commissioner’s finding that he could perform his past relevant work was

not supported by substantial evidence in the record.

We limit our review of a denial of disability benefits to two inquiries: (1) whether the

Commissioner’s decision is supported by substantial evidence in the record; and (2) whether the

Commissioner applied the proper legal standards in evaluating the evidence.1 Although we review

the entire record, we do not reweigh the evidence or substitute our judgment for the judgment of

the Commissioner.2

We have reviewed the record and the briefs filed by the parties, and find no error in the

judgment of the district court. We agree with the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation,

which was adopted by the district court, that the Commissioner’s decision is supported by

substantial evidence in the record and is consistent with relevant legal standards.3 Accordingly,

we affirm.

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6047

JAMES EDWARD PRINCE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN, JR., Warden; J. JOSEPH

CURRAN, JR., Attorney General,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District

Judge. (CA-97-1464-H)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 22, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Edward Prince, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney General,

Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Prince v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-1464-H (D. Md.

Dec. 17, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Sales Company Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10(x) 
 PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION 
 SALES COMPANY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 Participants:        Certain Group Presidents and certain other management personnel 
  

	Terms:	Participants will receive two Return on Net Asset (“RONA”) bonus shares based on the average net assets of the local sales companies and a cash bonus equal to 1 percent
(or fraction thereof) of base salary for each 1 percent (or fraction thereof) of sales by which the local sales companies exceed their sales for the prior year. Acquisitions are excluded from this calculation. Participants are limited to an overall
maximum annual bonus equal to 30 percent of base salary.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Katy  Industries,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the period  ending  March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Amir
Rosenthal,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Amir Rosenthal
------------------
Amir Rosenthal
Chief Financial Officer
May 9, 2005

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Katy Industries,
Inc.  and  will be  retained  by Katy  Industries,  Inc.  and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                     - 37 -
#### GILES v. TRI-STATE ERECTORS

No. 106 PC.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 148.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 4 February 1975.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 226 (Friday, November 25, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71175-71176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23375]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Notice of Meeting; Sunshine Act

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Tuesday, November 29, 2005.

[[Page 71176]]


Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Request from a Federal Credit Union to Convert to a Community 
Charter.
    2. NCUA's Operating Budget for 2006/2007.
    3. NCUA's Overhead Transfer Rate.
    4. NCUA's Operating Fee Scale for 2006.
    5. Interim Final Rule and Request for Comments: Part 707 of NCUA's 
Rules and Regulations, Truth in Savings.
    6. Final Rule: Part 796 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Post-
Employment Restrictions for Certain NCUA Examiners.

Recess: 11:15 a.m.

Time and Date: 11:30 a.m., Tuesday, November 29, 2005.

Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: 
    1. Part 703 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Pilot Program Request. 
Closed pursuant to Exemption (4).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-23375 Filed 11-22-05; 3:20 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M