alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 23 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 23 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 23 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 23 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 23 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 23 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 23 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 23 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 23 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 23 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 23 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 23 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 23 Filed 04/11/2008 Page 13 of 13
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 1, 2014

s0924

Order 

Clerk

October 1, 2014

148156

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148156

COA: 312889

Saginaw CC: 11-035390-FH

DENNIS LEE MATZKE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of January 31, 2014, the application for leave to appeal the November 

19, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

People v McKinley (Docket No. 147391). On order of the Court, the case having been 

decided on June 26, 2014, 496 Mich 410 (2014), the application is again considered, and 

it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be 

reviewed by this Court.
[ARTICLE] 9
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   12-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1996
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1996
[CASH]                                       6,863,559
[INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS]                       1,886,000
[FED-FUNDS-SOLD]                            11,983,000
[TRADING-ASSETS]                                     -
[INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE]                 13,449,288
[INVESTMENTS-CARRYING]                       2,363,744
[INVESTMENTS-MARKET]                        15,815,120
[LOANS]                                     89,046,526
[ALLOWANCE]                                  1,781,013
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                             132,290,583
[DEPOSITS]                                 116,693,583
[SHORT-TERM]                                         -
[LIABILITIES-OTHER]                            905,472
[LONG-TERM]                                  3,507,279
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                -
[PREFERRED]                                          -
[COMMON]                                       403,500
[OTHER-SE]                                  10,780,749
[TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY]             132,290,583
[INTEREST-LOAN]                              9,479,255
[INTEREST-INVEST]                            1,599,830
[INTEREST-OTHER]                                27,623
[INTEREST-TOTAL]                            11,106,708
[INTEREST-DEPOSIT]                           4,512,373
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                           4,823,086
[INTEREST-INCOME-NET]                        6,283,622
[LOAN-LOSSES]                                  201,589
[SECURITIES-GAINS]                            (15,708)
[EXPENSE-OTHER]                              5,585,944
[INCOME-PRETAX]                              2,092,402
[INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY]                   2,092,402
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      -
[CHANGES]                                            -
[NET-INCOME]                                 1,430,324
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                     3.54
[EPS-DILUTED]                                     3.54 
[YIELD-ACTUAL]                                       -
[LOANS-NON]                                    553,000
[LOANS-PAST]                                   226,000
[LOANS-TROUBLED]                                     -
[LOANS-PROBLEM]                                 35,000
[ALLOWANCE-OPEN]                               994,027
[CHARGE-OFFS]                                  259,264
[RECOVERIES]                                   273,954
[ALLOWANCE-CLOSE]                            1,781,013
[ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC]                         1,781,013
[ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN]                                  - 
[ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED]                              -
</TABLE>
BOSTON SAFE DEPOSIT AND TRUST COMPANY

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

Annual  Statement as to  Compliance  pursuant to Section 3.16 of the Pooling and
Servicing  Agreement  ("the  Agreement")  Dated as of  September  1, 1999  [MRFC
1999-TBC3]


I, William Connell,  being Senior Vice President of Dovenmuehle Mortgage,  Inc.,
as  Sub-Servicer  of Boston Safe Deposit and Trust  Company,  hereby  certify as
follows:

(i) a review of the activities of the Master  Servicer during the period October
1, 1999 through  December 31, 1999 and of the performance of the Master Servicer
under this Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;

(ii) to the best of such officer's  knowledge,  based on such review, the Master
Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement  throughout such
period,  or,  if  there  has  been a  default  in the  fulfillment  of any  such
obligations,  specifying  each such default known to such officer and the nature
and status  thereof and the action  being  taken by the Master  Servicer to cure
such default.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 31st
day of March, 2000.

By:

Name:     William J. Connell
Title:    Senior Vice President
          Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of December 5, 2005: 

A closed meeting will be held on Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 2 p.m. 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be present. 

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (3), (5), (7), (9)(B), and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a), (3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10) permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting. 

Commissioner Glassman, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the closed meeting in closed session. 

The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled for Thursday, December 8, 2005 will be:

Formal orders of investigations; 

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; 

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature; and an 

Adjudicatory matter. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. 

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: November 29, 2005. 

Jonathan G. Katz, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05-23612 Filed 11-30-05; 11:33 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2012 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2012

       To provide that certain regulatory actions by the Federal 
        Communications Commission shall have no force or effect.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 2019

 Mrs. Feinstein (for herself, Mr. Schumer, Ms. Harris, Mr. Bennet, Mr. 
 Wyden, Mr. Cardin, and Mr. Blumenthal) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To provide that certain regulatory actions by the Federal 
        Communications Commission shall have no force or effect.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restoring Local Control Over Public 
Infrastructure Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

    In this Act, the term ``Commission'' means the Federal 
Communications Commission.

SEC. 3. PRESERVATION OF RIGHTS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.

    The following regulatory actions of the Commission shall have no 
force or effect:
            (1) The Declaratory Ruling in the ``Third Report and Order 
        and Declaratory Ruling in the matter of Accelerating Wireline 
        Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure 
        Investment and Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by 
        Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment'' adopted by the 
        Commission on August 2, 2018 (FCC 18-111).
            (2) The ``Declaratory Ruling and Third Report and Order in 
        the matter of Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by 
        Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment and Accelerating 
        Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to 
        Infrastructure Investment'' adopted by the Commission on 
        September 26, 2018 (FCC 18-133).
            (3) The rule adopted by the Commission entitled 
        ``Accelerating Wireless and Wireline Broadband Deployment by 
        Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment'' (83 Fed. Reg. 
        51867 (October 15, 2018)).
                                 <all>
```
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1718 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to reinstate criminal penalties for 

persons charging veterans unauthorized fees, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2019 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. BLUNT, and Mr. YOUNG) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to reinstate criminal 

penalties for persons charging veterans unauthorized 

fees, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Our Disabled 

5 Heroes Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF PENALTIES FOR CHARGING 

7 VETERANS UNAUTHORIZED FEES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5905 of title 38, United 

9 States Code, is amended to read as follows: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1718 IS

1 ‘‘§ 5905. Penalty for certain acts 

2 ‘‘Except as provided in section 5904 or 1984 of this 

3 title, whoever— 

4 ‘‘(1) in connection with a proceeding before the 

5 Department, knowingly solicits, contracts for, 

6 charges, or receives any fee or compensation in con7 nection for— 

8 ‘‘(A) the provision of advice on how to file 

9 a claim for benefits under the laws adminis10 tered by the Secretary; or 

11 ‘‘(B) the preparation, presentation, or 

12 prosecution of such a claim before the date on 

13 which a notice of disagreement is filed in a pro14 ceeding on the claim; 

15 ‘‘(2) attempts to solicit, contract, charge, or re16 ceive as described in paragraph (1); 

17 ‘‘(3) unlawfully withholds from any claimant or 

18 beneficiary any part of a benefit or claim under the 

19 laws administered by the Secretary that is allowed 

20 and due to the claimant or beneficiary, or attempts 

21 to do so; 

22 ‘‘(4) commits an offense punishable by this 

23 chapter, or aids, abets, counsels, commands, or pro24 cures the commission of such an act; or 

25 ‘‘(5) causes an act to be done, which if directly 

26 performed would be punishable by this chapter, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1718 IS

1 shall be fined as provided in title 18, or imprisoned for 

2 not more than one year, or both.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to acts committed 

5 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Case 1:07-cr-00376-VM Document 9 Filed 11/05/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cr-00376-VM Document 9 Filed 11/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 1364** 

In re: ROSARIO A. FIORANI, JR., a/k/a R oss A. Fiorani, Jr. , Petitioner
.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
. ( 4:11

- cv - 00038

- RAJ

- TEM )

Submitted : May 31, 2012 Decided: June 5, 2012

Before DIAZ and THACKER , Circuit Judges. ∗

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
.
Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

∗ The opinion is filed by a quorum pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).2 PER CURIAM: Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., petitions this court for a writ of mandamus seeking an order vacating and /or reversing various orders on the ground they were the product of judicial corruption and/or bias. We conclude that Fiorani is not entitled to mandamus rel ief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976) ; United States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003) . Further, mandamus relief is av ailable only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. I n re First Fed. Sav. & Loan
Ass’ n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988)
. Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). The relief sought by Fiorani is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because th e facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Case 1:07-cv-03525-PKL Document 11 Filed 06/03/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### VeELLA MASSEY v. CALVIN GASTON SMITH.

(Filed 14 October, 1964.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Patton, J.,*May 1964 Civil Session of MeCKlenbueg.

Plaintiff was injured when struck by an automobile operated by defendant. The collision occurred at night as plaintiff was crossing Hawkins Place, a street in Derita. Plaintiff, to support her claim for damages, alleged the collision was caused by defendant’s negligent failure: (1) to keep a proper lookout, (2) to maintain control over his vehicle, (3) to give warning of his approach, and (4) driving on the wrong side of the street.

Defendant denied plaintiff’s allegation of negligence. As an additional defense, he pleaded plaintiff’s negligence as a contributing cause of the collision.

The jury, on appropriate issues, found the collision was caused by the negligence of both parties. Judgment was entered that plaintiff recover nothing. Plaintiff excepted and appealed.

*Charles V. Bell for appellant.*

*Haynes, Graham & Bernstein for appellee.*

Pee Cueiam.

Plaintiff has only one exception, that is to the charge covering eleven pages of the record. The exception is broadside. It is *612not sufficient to raise the question: Did the court comply with G.S. 1-180? *Rigsbee v. Perkins,*242 N.C. 502, 87 S.E. 2d 926. Hence there is no exception on which to base an assignment of error. Error is not shown by an assignment not supported by appropriate exception. *Clifton v. Turner,*257 N.C. 92, 125 S.E. 2d 339; *Holden v. Holden,*245 N.C. 1, 95 S.E. 2d 118.

No error.
Case 1:07-cv-03241-RJH-MHD Document 25 Filed 01/14/2008 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03241-RJH-MHD Document 25 Filed 01/14/2008 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03241-RJH-MHD Document 25 Filed 01/14/2008 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03241-RJH-MHD Document 25 Filed 01/14/2008 Page 4 of 4
1 Local Rule 47.5 provides: “The publication of opinions that have

no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the

basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on

the public and burdens on the legal profession.” Pursuant to that

Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-40572

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

TONY RAY MARTIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Texas

(6:95-CR-15)

December 12, 1995

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

A ppellant, Tony Ray Martin, pleaded guilty to one co unt of

making false statements in connection with renewal of a loan from

the Agricultural Productio n Credit Association. Over Martin’s

objection, the district court increased his base offense level two

points for more than minimal planning. Appellant contends that the2

district court erred because, in so doing, it relied on other false

statements regarding the collateral for the loan which he made

during a seven month period preceding the renewal of the loan. We

disagree and affirm.

Whether a defendant has engaged in more than minimal planning

is a question of fact which we review for clear error. U nited

States v. McCord

, 33 F.3d 1434, 1454 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied

,

115 S.Ct. 2558 (1995). Appellant does not contend that the

district court’s factual findings are clearly erroneous but only

that his earlier conduct does not relate to the crime to which he

pled. The sentencing guidelines define more than minimal planning

as “more planning than is typical for commission of the offense in

a simple form.” Section 1B1.1, comment. More than minimal

planning “is deemed present in any case inv olving repeated acts

over a period of time, unless it is clear that ea ch was purely

opportune.” Id.

Martin first represented to the APCA that he owned twenty-nine

head of cattle, which he did not. He later falsely represented to

the APCA that he was leasing in connection with his operation two

tracts of land, one containing 125 acres and one containing 60

acres. As a result of these representations, he was given the

initial loan. He received three advances on that loan. Later he

represented that he owned forty-three head of cattle on each of the

two tracts. He owned none of the cattle. As a result of that

representation he obtained a third advance. He then renewed the

loan making further misrepresentations to which he pleaded guilty.3

The misrepresentations made in securing the loan and obtaining the

advances were repeated acts over a period of time which resulted in

part in the renewal for which he plead guilty.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Decorize, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies that Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Annual Report
      on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended June 30, 2006 and filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.




/s/
                Stephen R. CrowderStephen
                R. CrowderPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)
              October
                9, 2007
**EXHIBIT32**

 

            Harry Lee WaterfieldII and Raymond L. Carr, being the President and Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer, respectively, of Investors Heritage Capital Corporation, hereby certify as of this____thday of December, 2009, that the Form 10-Q/A for the Quarter ended March 31, 2009fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q/Afairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Investors Heritage Capital Corporation.

 

 

|   | **INVESTORS			HERITAGE CAPITAL CORPORATION** 
  
BY:  /s/Harry			Lee Waterfield II 
Harry Lee			Waterfield II
DATE:			December ___, 2009
President 
  
			BY:  /s/Raymond L. Carr 
Raymond L.			Carr
DATE: December			___, 2009
Vice President			- Chief Financial Officer
  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|