alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      UT
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       


<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      503,668
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     28,680
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         151,342
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       116,477
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 800,167
<COMMON>                                        19,494
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       38,949
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            216,328
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 274,771
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,960
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           179,280
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  86,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 258,156
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  800,167
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      356,652
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            17,345
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     300,828
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     318,173
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         38,479
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               2,178
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  40,657
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        10,812
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,845
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         49
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   29,796
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        11,811  
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        6,694
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          46,655
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.69

<FN>
Capital-surplus-paid-in is net of $24,017 of treasury stock.





                                 Page 30
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-8 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 20Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-8 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 2 of 20Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-8 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 3 of 20Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-8 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 4 of 20Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-8 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 5 of 20Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-8 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 6 of 20Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-8 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 7 of 20Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-8 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 8 of 20Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-8 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 9 of 20Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-8 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 10 of 20Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-8 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 11 of 20Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-8 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 12 of 20Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-8 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 13 of 20Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-8 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 14 of 20Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-8 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 15 of 20Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-8 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 16 of 20Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-8 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 17 of 20Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-8 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 18 of 20Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-8 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 19 of 20Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 7-8 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 20 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 3 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 4 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 5 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 6 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 7 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 8 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 9 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 10 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 11 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 12 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 13 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 14 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 15 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 16 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 17 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 18 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 19 of 19
atel_Ex4_1


		
			Exhibit 4.1
		

		
			DESCRIPTION OF COMPANY MEMBERSHIP INTEREST (“UNITS”)
		

		
			Fast Act Exhibit 4(vi) “Description of registrant’s securities”
		

		
			Summary
		

		
			The following description summarizes certain important terms of ATEL 17, LLC’s (the “Company”) membership interests (the “Units”). This description summarizes the provisions that are included in the Company’s Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement (the “Operating Agreement”).  This summary will not provide all the information relevant to the Units. For a complete description of the Units,  please refer to the applicable provisions of Company’s  Operating Agreement and relevant California governing law.
		

		
			Outstanding Units
		

		
			2,565,749 Units have been subscribed by the members of the Company as of December 31, 2019.
		

		
			General
		

		
			Liquidity. The Units were offered and sold pursuant to registration under the Securities Act of 1933.  However, the Units are subject to significant restriction on transferability in order to preserve the tax characterization of the Company and tax consequences for Unit holders.  Accordingly, the Units are not traded on any securities exchange and have limited liquidity.  Please review the rights of Unit holders for transfer of shares under the Operating Agreement.
		

		
			Voting Rights. The holders of Units are entitled to one vote per share on any matter to be voted upon by holders of Units in the Company’s Operating Agreement. Certain rights may only be exercised upon receiving at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by Unit holders
		

		
			Distributions. The holders of Units are entitled to distributions on a pro rata basis, if, as, and when distributed by the Manager.
		

		
			Other Rights. No holder of Units has any priority or preemptive right as to the Units.
		

		
			Dissolution and Winding Up. Upon any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, the Unit holders are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of creditors.
		

		
			Transfer Agent and Registrar. The transfer agent and registrar of the Units is Conduent Inc.
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 7-2 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 7-2 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 7-2 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 7-2 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 7-2 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 7-2 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 7-2 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 7-2 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 7-2 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 9 of 9
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-18-00276-CR

NO. 02-18-00277-CR

JOSEPH RAUCH APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 16TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NOS. F16-1106-16, F16-1107-16

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Joseph Rauch attempts to appeal two 2017 trial court 

judgments. Because we have no jurisdiction over these appeals, we dismiss 

them.

 1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

In trial court cause number F16-1106-16, Appellant pled guilty to firstdegree felony possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver—a 

lesser-included offense of his indicted offense (engaging in organized criminal 

activity), in exchange for a sentence of eight years’ confinement. See Tex. 

Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.113(d) (West 2017); Tex. Penal Code Ann. 

§ 12.32 (West 2011), § 71.02(a)(5), (b)(3) (West Supp. 2017). In trial court 

cause number F16-1107-16, Appellant pled guilty to money laundering in 

exchange for one year’s confinement in the state jail division. See Tex. Penal 

Code Ann. § 12.35 (West Supp. 2017), § 34.02(a)–(b), (e)(1) (West 2016). The 

trial court ordered the two sentences to run concurrently.

The trial court convicted and sentenced Appellant in both cases on March 

10, 2017, and Appellant did not file a motion for new trial. Accordingly, 

Appellant’s notice of appeal in each case was due by April 10, 2017, but he did 

not file his notice of appeal in either case until June 11, 2018. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 26.2(a) (providing that a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days of 

sentencing absent a timely motion for new trial). His notices of appeal were 

therefore filed approximately fourteen months too late. See id.

We informed Appellant by letter of our concern that we lack jurisdiction 

over these appeals because his notices of appeal, which were due April 10, 

2017, were untimely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a), 26.3(b). We stated that 

these appeals would be subject to dismissal absent a response showing grounds 

for continuing them. We have received no response.
3

A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of rule 26 is 

essential to vest this court with jurisdiction over an appeal. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 26.2. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has expressly held that without a 

timely filed notice of appeal, we cannot exercise jurisdiction over an appeal. 

Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

Because Appellant filed his pro se notices of appeal too late, we dismiss 

these appeals for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: PITTMAN, J.; SUDDERTH, C.J.; and BIRDWELL, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 23, 2018
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 29, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 71555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23452]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CA-310-0777-XX]


Notice of Public Meeting: Northeast California Resource Advisory 
Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
of 1976 (FLPMA), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 
the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 
Northeast California Resource Advisory Council will meet as indicated 
below.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday and Friday, Jan. 5 and 6, 
2006, in the Conference Room of the Bureau of Land Management Alturas 
Field Office, 708 W. 12 St., Alturas, CA. The meeting runs from 1 to 5 
p.m. Jan. 5 and from 8 a.m. to noon on Jan. 6. Time for public comment 
is reserved on Friday, Jan. 6.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Burke, BLM Alturas Field Office 
manager, (530) 233-4666; or BLM Public Affairs Officer Joseph J. 
Fontana, (530) 252-5332.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15-member council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning and 
management issues associated with public land management in Northeast 
California and the northwest corner of Nevada. At this meeting, agenda 
topics will include an update on draft resource management plans for 
the Alturas, Eagle Lake and Surprise field offices, a status report on 
development of the Sagebrush Steppe Ecosystem Restoration Plan and 
information on the Sierra Nevada Conservancy. All meetings are open to 
the public. Members of the public may present written comments to the 
council. Each formal council meeting will have time allocated for 
public comments. Depending on the number of persons wishing to speak, 
and the time available, the time for individual comments may be 
limited. Members of the public are welcome on field tours, but they 
must provide their own transportation and lunch. Individuals who plan 
to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language 
interpretation and other reasonable accommodations, should contact the 
BLM as provided above.

    Dated: November 22, 2005.
Joseph J. Fontana,
Public Affairs Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-23452 Filed 11-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-M
#### STATE v. MIMS

No. 78 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 326.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 December 1977. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 6 December 1977.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1913 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to establish a bollard installation 

grant program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 19, 2019 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to establish a 

bollard installation grant program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stopping Threats On 

5 Pedestrians Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘STOP Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BOLLARD INSTALLATION GRANT PROGRAM. 

7 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

8 (1) BOLLARD INSTALLATION PROJECT.—The 

9 term ‘‘bollard installation project’’ means a project 

10 to install raised concrete or metal posts on a sideVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:30 Jun 21, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1913.IS S1913

jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1913 IS

1 walk adjacent to a roadway that are designed to 

2 slow or stop a motor vehicle. 

3 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

4 the Secretary of Transportation. 

5 (b) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 1 year after 

6 the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall es7 tablish and carry out a competitive grant program to pro8 vide assistance to local government entities for bollard in9 stallation projects designed to prevent pedestrian injuries 

10 and acts of terrorism in areas used by large numbers of 

11 pedestrians. 

12 (c) APPLICATION.—To be eligible to receive a grant 

13 under this section, a local government entity shall submit 

14 to the Secretary an application at such time, in such form, 

15 and containing such information as the Secretary deter16 mines to be appropriate, which shall include, at a min17 imum— 

18 (1) a description of the proposed bollard instal19 lation project to be carried out; 

20 (2) a description of the pedestrian injury or ter21 rorism risks with respect to the proposed installation 

22 area; and 

23 (3) an analysis of how the proposed bollard in24 stallation project will mitigate those risks. 


jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1913 IS

1 (d) USE OF FUNDS.—A recipient of a grant under 

2 this section may only use the grant funds for a bollard 

3 installation project. 

4 (e) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the 

5 costs of a bollard installation project carried out with a 

6 grant under this section may be up to 100 percent. 

7 (f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

8 authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry 

9 out this section $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 

10 through 2029. 

Æ 


jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 14 Filed 01/16/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03477-LAK Document 14 Filed 01/16/2008 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 6708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2354]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Cancer Institute Director's Consumer Liaison Group.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Director's Consumer 
Liaison Group.
    Date: February 28-March 1, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: 1. Reports from NCI: Health Disparities; Planning; 
Survivorship; 2. Status of NCI Listens and Learns Web Site; 3. 
Listens and Learns Evaluation Plan and Summit Evaluation Plan; 4. 
Listens and Learns Working Group Meetings; 5. Meetings with NCI 
Deputy Director; 6. Public Comment; 7. Next steps.
    Place: Holiday Inn Select Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Ave, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Nancy Caliman, Executive Secretary, Office of 
Liaison Activities, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer 
Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Suite 220, MSC8324, Bethesda, 
MD 20892, (301) 496-0307, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ccafada0a5a1ada2a28ca1ada5a0e2a2a5a4e2aba3ba"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3d5e5c5154505c53537d505c545113535455135a524b">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is to be published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to scheduling conflicts.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institutes's/Center's home 
page: http://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/dclg/dclg.htm, where an 
agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted 
when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.932, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 2, 2005.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-2354 Filed 2-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE v. BATES

No. 66 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 276.

Application by defendant for further review denied 3 November 1978.
#### Star Brewery of Chicago v. Johanna Croake.

1. *Practice—Question of Excessive*Damages.—Neither a general exception to the finding, nor a motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict is against the evidence, raises the question of the excessive amount of the finding.

Memorándum.—In the County Court on appeal from a justice of the peace; the Hon. Charles H. Donnelly, County Judge of McHenry County, presiding. Submitted at the October term, 1894.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 10, 1895.

E. S. Cummings, attorney for appellant.

Oscar E. Leinen, attorney for appellee.

Mr. Justice Gary

delivered the opinion oe the Court.

The appellant was guarantor of the performance of all covenants by lessees of the appellee, among which covenants were one to pay rent and another to pay all attorney fees incurred by the appellee in enforcing the covenants of the lease. The rent was $55 per month.

The lease contained a provision that if the lessees abandoned the premises the appellee might relet them, and if, at. a loss, the lessees would pay the deficiency.

*288She sued for $50 deficiency on two months, and $110 attorney fees incurred in enforcing the covenants in former suits.

On the trial she testified that under written leases she had received $60 for the two months, and the appellant objected and excepted to such testimony without the production of the leases; but the covenant was *“*if a sufficient sum shall not be thus realized * * * to satisfy and pay all deficiency.”

The question therefore was, not what others had agreed to pajr, but how much she had realized, which the leases, if produced, had no tendency to show.

After the evidence on the part of the appelleee was all in, the appellant moved the court that the finding be for $60, which motion the court overruled, and later entered a finding for $160, to which the appellant excepted.

The appellant is not in a position, after such a motion, to complain generally of a finding for the appellee.

The case is, in substance, like that of giving instructions upon a principle concurred in by both parties, when neither can complain. Keeler v. Kerr, 54 Ill. App. 468.

Neither a'general exception to the finding, nor a motion for a new trial assigning as a reason that the finding is against the evidence, raises any question of excessive amount. Giffert v. McGuern, 51 Ill. App. 387.

We shall not, therefore, take the pains to' show that the amount is in fact right. The judgment is affirmed.
Case 1:07-cv-03430-BSJ-AJP Document 2 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 1 of 1