alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7744

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSE FERREIRA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District

Judge. (CR-90-432-A, CA-97-637-AM)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 31, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Ferreira, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jose Ferreira seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ferreira, No. CR-90-432-A (E.D. Va.

Oct. 14, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.2


 





 


April 1, 2008


 


Leslie Goldmann


 


Dear Leslie:


 


This letter will serve as confirmation of the updated terms of your
compensation.


 


Compensation:


 


	
  INCREASE

  	
   

  	
  CURRENT

  	
   

  	
  NEW

  	
   

  
	
  BASE
  SALARY:

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  475,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  550,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  IC TARGET %:

  	
   

  	
  60

  	
  %

  	
  60

  	
  %

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  TOTAL COMP:

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  760,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  880,000

  	
   

  



 


Your new Base Salary will be effective immediately.


 


Since IC can range from %0 to 200%, at your new base salary, you will
receive a minimum total compensation of $550,000 and
a maximum of $1,210,000, over the course of
the next 12 months.


 


In addition, you will receive 100,000
option shares of New York & Company common stock.  70,000 will
be issued at a strike price of $4.74 and 30,000 at a strike price equal to
closing price on the date of the next Board of Directors meeting.  These options are subject to the terms and
conditions as set forth in our Option Plan.


 


You will also be eligible for a one-time bonus of $500,000
two years from the date of this letter (April 1, 2008). This bonus will be
repayable to the company, if you should choose to leave the business within 1
year of the payment date.


 


Leslie, I hope
that this compensation change demonstrates our commitment to you. I look
forward to working together to build a great future. If you have any questions
please let me know or contact Sandra.


 


	
  Sincerely,

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Richard P. Crystal

  	
   

  
	
  Richard P. Crystal

  	
   

  
	
  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Ending Soon – American Rescue Plan

Emergency Paid Leave

This message is intended for all DOL Federal Employees.

Dear Colleagues:

This is a reminder that the Emergency Paid Leave (EPL) provided under the American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act is

scheduled to end on September 30, 2021. EPL provides a source of paid leave for Federal employees who are unable

to work (including telework) due to specific qualifying reasons related to the COVID-19 pandemic. EPL may be claimed

retroactively to March 11, 2021, for those in limited leave circumstances.

It is important to note that the ARP created a fund of $570 million to be shared by Federal agencies to cover the costs of

EPL. Because of this limit, the use of EPL by employees is conditional on the availability of funding. Additionally, the ARP

requires that the use of EPL will reduce an employee’s creditable service when their retirement benefit is calculated. It is,

therefore, important that employees carefully consider if using EPL is the best option for their situation.

More information on EPL can be found on LaborNet.

If you have questions regarding EPL, please send an email to 

Sydney T. Rose | Chief Human Capital Officer

Posted: September 17, 2021

LABORNET
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------X

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

-against- NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

 

NILESH RAJANIKANT SHAH 07 Cr. 357 (CM)

Defendant. 

------------------------------------------------X

TO: THE CLERK

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SIR: You are hereby notified that I appear for the Defendant NILESH RAJANIKANT SHAH

in the above-captioned action.

I am appearing in this action as retained counsel and was admitted to practice in this

Court in October 1988.

I do hereby certify that I have filed or will file a certificate of good standing from the New

York State Court, Second Department, pursuant to Criminal Rule 1 of the local rules for

the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York.

Dated: New York, New York

May 3, 2007 

 

JOYCE C. LONDON

Attorney for Defendant

MILESH RAJANIKANT SHAH

20 Vesey Street, Suite 400

New York, New York 10007

(212) 964-3700

cc: Honorable Colleen McMahon (By First Class Mail)

AUSA William J. Stellmach (By Fax: 212: 637-2527)

Richard B. Lind, Esq. (By First Class Mail)

 

Case 1:07-cr-00357-CM Document 20 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-22 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-22 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-22 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 3 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-22 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 4 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-22 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 5 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-22 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 6 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-22 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 7 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-22 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 8 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-22 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 9 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-22 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 10 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-22 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 11 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-22 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 12 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-22 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 13 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-22 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 14 of 14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------X 

HELAL AHMED, PARVEZ ALI, MD. G. MIAH, : 

ENAMUL SHAKUR, CARLOS ORTIZ, GRZEGORZ : 

KOCIECKI, MAHBUBUL KARIM, TANVIR SHAHID, : 

ADRIAN DOMINGUEZ RESENDIZ, CESAR : 

ABAMBARI, HORACIO HERNANDEZ, JOSE REYES, : 

PATRICIO GONZALEZ, SHAILENDRA SHRESTHA, : 

ROHIT TALWAR, MARCOS REYES, ROBERTO : 

SEGUNDO, FELIX SEGUNDO, and AUGUSTIN : 

REYES, on behalf of themselves and other similarly : 07-CV-3512 (JSR) (FM) 

situated current and former restaurant workers employed : 

by Defendants, : NOTICE OF MOTION 

 : 

 Plaintiffs, : 

 : 

 v. : 

 : 

DEVI RESTAURANT, LTD., RAKESH AGGARWAL, : 

SUVIR SARAN, and HEMANT MATHUR, : 

 : 

 Defendants. : 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------X 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the accompanying Memorandum of 

Law in Support of the Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint on Behalf of 

Suvir Saran and Hemant Mathur, dated December 7, 2007, Defendants Suvir Saran and 

Hemant Mathur will move this Court before the Honorable Jed S. Rakoff on a date to be 

set by the Court, in the United States Courthouse, Southern District of New York, 500 

Pearl Street, New York, New York, for an Order pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing the Third Amended Complaint in its entirety with 

prejudice and for such further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. 

 PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 6.1(b) of the 

Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New 

York, answering papers, if any, must be served and filed by December 21, 2007. 

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 21 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York 

 December 7, 2007 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

THOMPSON WIGDOR & GILLY LLP 

By: /s/ ___________ 

Scott B. Gilly (SG-6861) 

 

350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5720 

New York, New York 10118 

Telephone: (212) 239-9292 

Facsimile: (212) 239-9001 

Attorneys for Defendants Suvir Saran 

and Hemant Mathur 

TO: Suyin So, Esq. 

Pryor Cashman LLP 

410 Park Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Tushar Sheth 

Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund 

99 Hudson Street 

New York, New York 100113 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Arthur Forman, Esq. 

 98-20 Metropolitan Avenue 

 Forest Hills, New York 11375 

Attorney for Defendants Devi 

Restaurant, Ltd. and Rakesh 

Aggarwal 

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 21 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03391-CLB-GAY     Document 15      Filed 11/08/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03211-PKC Document 6 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03211-PKC Document 6 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
- Disclaimer
- Preface
- Abstract
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Glossary
- Acronyms
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Discussion of the Hazard and Exposure Criteria
- 3. Site and Process Description
- 4. Methodology
- 5. Results and Discussion
- 6. Conclusions and Recommendations
#### STATE v. WHITTED

No. 125 PC.

Case below: 21 N.C. App. 649.

Petition of defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 July 1974. Petition of Attorney General for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 30 August 1974.
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**INTERWAVE COMMUNICATIONSINTERNATIONAL LTD.LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

 
| **Subsidiary**                                   |   | **Incorporated** |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------|
|                                             |   |             |
| interWAVE Communications, Inc.                   |   | Delaware, USA    |
| interWAVE Communications Australia Pty. Ltd.     |   | Australia        |
| interWAVE Communications B.V.                    |   | Netherlands      |
| interWAVE Communications India Private Limited   |   | India            |
| interWAVE Communications Ireland, Ltd.           |   | Ireland          |
| interWAVE Communications Lanka (Private) Limited |   | Sri Lanka        |
| interWAVE Communications Networks, S.A.          |   | Uruguay          |
| interWAVE Communications International S.A.      |   | France           |
| interWAVE Communications (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.    |   | P.R. China       |
| interWAVE Communications UK Limited.             |   | United Kingdom   |
| Microcellular Systems (Ireland) Limited          |   | Ireland          |
| Microcellular Systems USA                        |   | California, USA  |
| Wireless, Inc.                                   |   | Delaware, USA    |
| interWAVE Advanced Communications, Inc.          |   | Delaware, USA    |
| International Wave Communications Networks, Inc. |   | Philippines      |

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-03237-RMB Document 2 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### MUNCHAK CORP. v. CALDWELL

No. 37 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 240.

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 1978.
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 7, 2015

No. 04-14-00911-CR

Jacob ADAME,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR1530A

Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

The trial court=s certification in this appeal states that Athis criminal case is a plea-bargain 

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.@ The clerk=s record contains a written plea 

bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the 

prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court=s certification accurately 

reflects that the criminal case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Rule 

25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, AThe appeal must be dismissed if a 

certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record 

under these rules.@ TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal will be 

dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless appellant

causes an amended trial court certification to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of 

this order showing appellant has the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also 

Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.CSan Antonio 2003, order). All other appellate 

deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the certification issue.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Keystone
Consolidated Industries, Inc.'s consolidated financial statements for the three
months ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,466
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,765
<INVENTORY>                                     50,054
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,647
<PP&E>                                         350,826
<DEPRECIATION>                                 194,815
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 419,149
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          124,718
<BONDS>                                        101,394
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,656
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,795
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   419,149
<SALES>                                         91,717
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,920
<CGS>                                           83,663
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,663
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,269
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   115
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,516
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (643)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (295)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (348)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (348)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1818 

To require the Secretary of Transportation to publish a notice of proposed 

rulemaking concerning seat belts on school buses, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 12, 2019 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself and Mr. BOOKER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Transportation to publish a 

notice of proposed rulemaking concerning seat belts on 

school buses, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secure Every Child 

5 Under the Right Equipment Standards Act of 2019’’ or 

6 the ‘‘SECURES Act of 2019’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PROPOSED RULEMAKING. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

9 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of TransporVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:22 Jun 14, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1818.IS S1818

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1818 IS

1 tation shall publish a notice of proposed rulemaking on 

2 new Federal standards for school bus seat belt require3 ments on all school buses, regardless of gross vehicle 

4 weight rating. 

5 (b) CONSIDERATIONS.—In the proposed rulemaking 

6 under subsection (a), the Secretary of Transportation 

7 shall consider— 

8 (1) the safety benefits of lap/shoulder belt sys9 tem (also known as a ‘‘Type 2 seat belt assembly’’); 

10 (2) the conclusions of the National Transpor11 tation Safety Board that— 

12 (A) ‘‘lap/shoulder belts provide the highest 

13 level of protection for school bus passengers’’; 

14 and 

15 (B) ‘‘properly worn lap belts provide some 

16 benefit’’ while ‘‘properly worn lap/shoulder belts 

17 provide greater benefit by reducing injuries re18 lated to upper body flailing’’; 

19 (3) the 2015 announcement by the Adminis20 trator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Ad21 ministration, Mark Rosekind, stating that the agen22 cy believes that ‘‘every child on every school bus 

23 should have a three-point seat belt’’; 

24 (4) any innovative approaches to seat belt de25 tection, seat belt reminder systems, and seat belt 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 1818 IS

1 violation alert systems that could be incorporated 

2 into school bus designs; and 

3 (5) existing experience from States that have 

4 already required school buses to be equipped with 

5 seat belts. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-03495-SHS Document 8 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      554,533
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     27,912
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         348,897
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       170,250
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,101,592
<COMMON>                                        20,744
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       61,820
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            212,595
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 295,159
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,763
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           234,394
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 198,800
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           21
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 371,455
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,101,592
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      345,025
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            10,630
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     309,278
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     319,908
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         25,117
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 992
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  26,109
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         7,592
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,517
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         22
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   18,495
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         6,324
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        4,377
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         (48,989)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .98
<FN>
Capital-surplus-paid-in is net of $24,017 of treasury stock.
                            Page 98

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 23 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 1 of 6Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 23 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 2 of 6Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 23 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 3 of 6Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 23 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 4 of 6Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 23 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 5 of 6Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 23 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 6 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03417-DAB-DCF Document 12 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03417-DAB-DCF Document 12 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03417-DAB-DCF Document 12 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03417-DAB-DCF Document 12 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Bontan Corporation Inc.. for the year ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bontan Corporation Inc.





Date:  May 10, 2007





/s/ Kam Shah



Kam Shah

Chief Executive Officer  and Chief Financial Officer







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.