alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 2 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 3 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 4 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 5 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 6 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 7 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 8 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 9 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 10 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 11 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 12 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 13 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 14 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 15 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 16 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 17 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 18 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 19 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 20 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 21 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 22 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 23 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 24 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 25 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 26 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-47 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 27 of 27
#### STATE v. ALSTON

No. 238 PC.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 72.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 December 1981.
Case 7:07-cv-03511-CLB-MDF Document 2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,578,609
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,835,817
<ALLOWANCES>                                   185,000
<INVENTORY>                                 20,279,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,020,978
<PP&E>                                      14,999,508
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,925,826
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,094,660
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,699,526
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       496,275
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,126,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,094,660
<SALES>                                     27,822,044
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,836,946
<CGS>                                       16,644,939
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,049,138
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,777,502
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,111,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,666,502
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,666,502
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
        

</TABLE>
#### LAND CO. v. WHITE

No. 36 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 548.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 7 October 1975.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE ENSTAR GROUP, INC., CONTAINED IN ITS
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          70,832
<SECURITIES>                                     3,733
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             153
<DEPRECIATION>                                      88
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,029
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              633
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,625
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,029
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,600
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,835
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,756
<INCOME-TAX>                                       172
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,584
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,584
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48


</TABLE>
#### MEDFORD v. MOODY

No. 20 PC.

Case below: 53 N.C. App. 371.

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 November 1981.
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 9 Filed 11/28/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 9 Filed 11/28/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-20 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-20 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-20 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-20 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-20 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03430-BSJ-AJP Document 4 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03430-BSJ-AJP Document 4 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03430-BSJ-AJP Document 4 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03430-BSJ-AJP Document 4 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03430-BSJ-AJP Document 4 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03430-BSJ-AJP Document 4 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 6 of 6
IJNI'l'bXI STATES DISTRIC'I' COl.rRT 

SOU'l'HERN DlSTRIC-S OF NEW YORK 

1. 1 

USDCSDNY i 

\ 

1 DOCUMENT 1 

1' 1, ELECTRONICALLY FIEE 

JU RE: 

j \,lASl'ER F1I.F 

FOSAMAX PKOII1;C''I'S LlrIB1LLI'Y L,ITIGATION 

i 1106-hII1-1789 (JFK) 

Thi.7 110cum~nt Ke1lrtv.s To '4 11 Actions 

ORDER FOR AnbIISSlOh' I'HO H.AC VICE 

Considering the Ccl-t i ticntc of Ciood Standing and all othcr docu~ncnts rcquired by case 

Managemen1 Order Nu. 5 subrnittcd by counsel. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

:\p~.>licant's Name: Herbert G. Smith 11 

Firm Narnc: Venable LLP 

City/Statc//.ip: Washington. DC 20004 

Email Address: hgsrnith~~venable.corn 

is admitted to practice prv hau \,ice as counsel Ibr llerck & Co.. luc. in tl~c LZ~CIL'C captiilncd C~SC 

in the United Stales District Court ti~r Ihe Suulheru District of Kcw York. 

Dated: ~arcdY 2008 

Ncw York. Neu \I'ot-k 

V United States District ~ud& 

Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 25 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

for the District of Columbia 

CLERK'S OFFICE 

333 Constitution Avenue, NFV 

Washington, DC 20001 

I, NANCY M. MAYER-WHITTINCTON, Clerk nf the United St;itc\ 

Dir;triot CO~II? i;)r the District of Columbia, clo hereby ccrlil'y thac: 

HERBERrI' G. SMITH, I1 

was, on thc 5"' day of May A.D. 1907 ;~drnj~tcd tu practice as an Attorney 

211 Law at the Bar ol- thik Court, and is. ;lccorcliug to the records of this Court, a 

mernber of haid Bur ill pod branding. 

In T'htin~uny Whereof, 1 hcrcunto suhscri bc my name :~nd affix thc sci~l or said Court 

in the City ul' Washington this 29''' day oi' February A.U. 2008. 

Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 25 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 2 of 2
`Exhibit 32(a)

                                  CERTIFICATION

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of
  Decorize, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Annual
  Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully
  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
  Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
  results of operations of the Company.



/s/ James K. Parsons
-----------------------------------------
James K. Parsons
President and Chief Executive Officer
September 26, 2003`
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS LEGEND  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE
CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COYOTE NETWORKS SYSTEMS, INC. AS
OF AND FOR THE  QUARTER  ENDED  JUNE 30,  1999,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                1344
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         2601
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (160)
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     15096
<PP&E>                                                7619
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (1196)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       34748
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                13399
<BONDS>                                               1464
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                           7595
<COMMON>                                             13290
<OTHER-SE>                                          (12256)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         34748
<SALES>                                               1860
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      1860
<CGS>                                                 1413
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         1413
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      2456
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (2177)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (2177)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       (1498)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (3675)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.34)


</TABLE>
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed April 28, 2021

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D 21

- 6 2 6 Lower Tribunal No. 19

- 4354

________________



### Walter Alexandre Houck Cruz , Appellant,

vs. 

### Richard A. Neely, et al. , Appellee s

.

A n A ppeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Milton Hirsch , Judge.

Walter Alexandre Houck Cruz , in proper person

. Chepenik Trushin LLP, and Daniel F. Bachman and Danielle Birman , for appellee s

.

Before SCA LE S , MIL L E R and L OBRE E , JJ.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

PER CURIAM.2 In this probate appeal , appellant Walter Alexandre Houck Cruz seeks

review of the trial court’s February 17, 2021 Distribution Order. 1 Appellees Richard A. Neely and Carolyn S. Neely, as personal representatives of the estate of Daniel Alen Neely, argue in their motion to dismiss that appellant does not have standing in this Court to seek re view of the Distribution Order. We agree and dismiss the appeal.

For appellant to have standing in this Court to seek review of the Distribution Order, he must be an “interested person” as defined by chapter 731 of the Florida Statutes, Florida’s Probate Code. Section 731.201(23) of

the Florida Statutes (2021) defines an “interested person” as “any person who may reasonably be expected to be affected by the outcome of the particular proceeding involve d.” See also Fla. R. App. P. 9.170(b) (“ [ A ] ppeals of orders rendered in probate

. . . cases shall be limited to orders that finally determine a right or obligation of an interested person as defined in the Florida Probate Code.”).

1 The February 17, 2021 order is titled : “ Corrected* Order Vacating April 30, 2020 Order on Amended Motion to Stay or Vacate Court Orders; Reentering March 2, 2020 Order Authorizing Distribution and Plan of Distribution Nunc Pro Tunc as of March 2, 2020; and Authorizing Distribution of Decedent’s E*Trade Investment Account.”3 A ppellant’s claim that he is an “interested person” in th is probate proceeding is based exclusively on a purported 2017 will. This 2017 will, however, was determined to be a forgery and was invalidated by the lower court’s January 15, 2021 final judgment. This January 15, 2021 final judgment was not appealed, and therefore, appellant no longer has an interest in, and will not be affected by the outcome of, any proceeding in this probate action. Because a ppellan t is not an “interested person ,” we grant appellee’s motion and dism iss appellant’s appeal for lack of standing. Appeal dismissed.
Yonorabi::: Jse X. Webb 

Cofnty Attorney 

Madison County 

i%disonville, Texas 

Gear Sir: 

Opinion No. O-1349 

I-h?: State Ss.nks -- County depository -- F. D. I. C. -- Insurance -- Maximum insurance of 

individual accounts. 

We have your letter of February 71'1$+0, in ribich yo;~ ask the ruling of this department upon questions therein stated, as follows, to-xit: 

"The County depository of Madisor,County, Texas, was the '~ 

North Zulch State Bank, located in Madison County.in the town 

of North .Zulch. Deposits up to $5000.00 were guaranteed by 

the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. This bank closed 

on January 4, 1940, and a. liquidating agent of the State Banking Department and officials of the Federal Deposit I~sursnc$,.~ 

Corporation immediately took charge. 

"The F. D. I. C., as guarantor, has offen:d .L:, the county 

Superintendeat the sum of $5000.00, takirrg the pos;fion that 

the several account balances of various schools azd of various 

other funds for school purposes comprise only one insurable account within the meaning of the F. D. I. C. Act, anal that, 

therefore, the payment of $5000.00 by the F. D. I. C. completely discharges its insurance liability as to schwl funds. The 

County Superintendent has declined to accept tllis $50X.00 offered by the F. D. I. C. Each and all of the s~2:ools affected 

as well as the school funds under consideration are commoa 

school districts. 

'!A list of all accounts involved is attxied hereto and 

made a part hereof. The names of the se\reral accounts are the 

same as appear on the bank books and the recxds of tKe County 

School officials. Each of these accounts was c%rrid &%perstely, a.nd on a separate sheet by the bank, also by -tLe Cox?ty 

School officials. 
Honorable Joe 2. Webb - page 2 - (O-1949) 

"Is each Cosmon School District a separate governmental 

ent ItyP 

"Is each Independent School District a separate governmental entity? 

"Does the money in any account listed under Madison County 

Board of Education held in trust or otherwise, enjoy such actual 

separate ownership a8 to entitle it to separate insurance under 

the terms of the F. D. I. C. Act? In this connection the term 

'County Board of Education' means the same as 'Board of County 

School Trustess'," 

Gur opinion No. O-1948 recently rendered to you has discussed quite 

fully the principles of law applicable to the questions propounded by you in 

this particular inquiry, and a further discussion is not thought to be necessary. 

In this, as in your other letter of inquiry, you state that each 

of these accounts was carried separately, and on a separate sheet by the bank. 

Our opinion No. O-1948 answers, we think, all of your inquiries, 

and no useful purpose could be subserved by making a detailed application of 

the law, as therein snnounced, to the particular fund or account listed in 

the sheet appended to your letter of inquiry. 

Very truly yours 

ATTOBNEYGENERALOFTEXAS 

By /s/ Ocie Speer 

Ocie Speer 

Assistant 

OS-MR-Ial 

APPROVED FEB 15, 1940 

IS/ Gerald C. Mann 

ATTOBNEYGEEEBALOFTEXAS 

APPROVED 

OPINION 

COMMITTEE 

BY /s/ BWB 

CHAIRMAN
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 16      Filed 10/29/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 16      Filed 10/29/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 16      Filed 10/29/2007     Page 3 of 3
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

April 23, 2010

Mr. Ken Slavin

Kemp Smith, LLP

221 North Kansas, Suite 1700

El Paso, TX 79901

Mr. Daniel L. Geyser

Asst. Solicitor General

Office of the Attorney General of Texas 

P.O. Box 12548 (MC 059)

Austin, TX 78711-2548

RE:Case Number:  08-0958

Court of Appeals Number:  03-07-00319-CV

Trial Court Number:  D-1-GV-06-1362

Style:PRESIDIO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

v.

ROBERT SCOTT, AS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinion in the above-referenced cause.  You may obtain a copy of the opinion at: http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/recent.asp.  If you would like the opinion by email, please contact Claudia Jenks at claudia.jenks@courts.state.tx.us or call (512)463-1312 ext. 41367.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Kathy Sandoval, Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 08-0958Page 1**
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 231 (Friday, December 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 72307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23466]



[[Page 72307]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4980-N-48]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 2, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: November 23, 2005.
Mark R. Johnston,
Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.
[FR Doc. 05-23466 Filed 12-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (the Company) for the
period ending January 31, 2006, I, William A. Shumaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 13, 2006



/s/ William A. ShumakerWilliam A. ShumakerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### ROBINSON v. McMAHAN

No. 102 PC.

Case below: 11 N.C. App. 275.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 September 1971.