alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6321

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WINCY JOSEPH, a/k/a Joseph Wincey,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Statesville. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (5:13-cr-00080-KDB-DSC-2; 5:17-cv00212-KDB)

Submitted: November 30, 2021 Decided: January 10, 2022

Before KING, AGEE, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wincy Joseph, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 20-6321 Doc: 14 Filed: 01/10/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Wincy Joseph seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 

759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that 

the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. 

Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Joseph has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 20-6321 Doc: 14 Filed: 01/10/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03547-SHS Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 1 of 12Case 1:07-cv-03547-SHS Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 2 of 12Case 1:07-cv-03547-SHS Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 3 of 12Case 1:07-cv-03547-SHS Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 4 of 12Case 1:07-cv-03547-SHS Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 5 of 12Case 1:07-cv-03547-SHS Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 6 of 12Case 1:07-cv-03547-SHS Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 7 of 12Case 1:07-cv-03547-SHS Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 8 of 12Case 1:07-cv-03547-SHS Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 9 of 12Case 1:07-cv-03547-SHS Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 10 of 12Case 1:07-cv-03547-SHS Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 11 of 12Case 1:07-cv-03547-SHS Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 12 of 12
**Exhibit 10.49**

 

**Description of Compensation Payable to Non-Employee Directors**

 

The following summarizes the current compensation and benefits received bythe Company’s non-employee directors. It is intended to be a summary of existing arrangements and is not intended to provide any additional rights to any director. 

 

Each non-employee director of the Company will receive an annual fee of $60,000 per year, payable $15,000 per calendarquarter, and $2,500 for each board meeting attended in person and $1,500 for each meeting attended via teleconference. In addition, the chair of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors will be paid a fee of $10,000 per year, payable $2,500 percalendar quarter, to serve in such capacity, the chair of each other committee of the Board of Directors will be paid a fee of $7,500 per year, payable $1,875 per calendar quarter, to serve in such capacity, and other committee members will be paida fee of $2,000 per year, payable $500 per calendar quarter, per committee for service on committees of the Board of Directors.
SHARON KELLER

 PRESIDING JUDGE

LAWRENCE E. MEYERS

CHERYL JOHNSON

MIKE KEASLER

BARBARA P. HERVEY

ELSA ALCALA

BERT RICHARDSON

KEVIN P. YEARY

DAVID NEWELL

 JUDGES

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK

(512) 463-1551

SIAN SCHILHAB

GENERAL COUNSEL

(512) 463-1597

SUPREME COURT BUILDING, 201 WEST 14TH STREET, ROOM 106, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701

WEBSITE WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/CCA.ASPX

January 21, 2015

Humberto Rodriguez Jr.

Hughes Unit - TDC # 1017893

Rt. 2, Box 4400

Gatesville, TX 76597

Re: RODRIGUEZ, HUMBERTO Jr.

CCA No. WR-81,853-01

Trial Court Case No. CR-0403-00-A (1)

Your letter has been received. Please be advised:

IMPORTANT: PLEASE INFORM THIS COURT OF ALL ADDRESS CHANGES IN 

WRITING.

Our records show that on January 21, 2015 your motion for rehearing, tendered as “In Banc 

Motion for Amended Opinion” was denied. The Court, however, rendered an opinion in which 

the prior opinion was withdrawn. Enclosed is a copy. Therefore, the Court will not be requiring 

any additional copies of your motion for rehearing filed December 10, 2014. 

Sincerely,

_____________________________

Abel Acosta, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      19,684,018
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,126,632
<ALLOWANCES>                                   300,000
<INVENTORY>                                 19,321,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            62,544,971
<PP&E>                                      15,895,954
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,362,970
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              69,077,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,934,935
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,043,641
<OTHER-SE>                                  51,282,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                69,077,955
<SALES>                                    103,219,645
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           103,611,233
<CGS>                                       61,038,625
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               90,489,752
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             13,120,631
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,313,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,806,831
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,806,831
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.73
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# AGENCY:

United States Election Assistance Commission.

# ACTION:

 Notice of public meeting (amended).

# Date & Time:

Thursday, October 4, 2007, 10 a.m.-1 p.m.

# Place:

U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave., NW., Suite 150, Washington, DC 20005, (Metro Stop: Metro Center).

# Agenda:

 Commissioners will receive the following presentations: Commissioners will receive updates on the next iteration of the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) and a report on a recommendation from the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP); Commissioners will consider an internal policy for handling State requests to change State-specific instructions to the National Voter Registration Form; Commissioners have granted a request from Secretary of State of Arizona to make a statement before the Commission; Commissioners will discuss other administrative matters.

This meeting will be open to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                         Bryan Whitener,                         *Telephone:*                         (202) 566-3100.                    

Thomas R. Wilkey,

Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commision.

[FR Doc. 07-4834  Filed 9-26-07; 2:44 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SheerVision, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Suzanne Puente, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.




Dated:
      December 15, 2009By:
                /s/
      Patrick AdamsPatrick
      AdamsChief
      Financial Officer





This
certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
SheerVision, Inc. and will be retained by SheerVision, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:07-cv-03557-AKH Document 2 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### BD. OF EDUCATION v. CONSTRUCTION CORP.

No. 24PC

No. 8 (Fall Term)

Case below: 50 NC App 238

Petition by plaintiff and by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 7 April 1981.
#### WACHOVIA BANK v. LIVENGOOD

No. 115 PC.

Now No. 86 PA 82.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 198.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 3 March 1982.
#### INSURANCE CO. v. COTTEN

No. 40 PC.

Case below: 12 N.C. App. 212.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 5 October 1971.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 226 (Friday, November 25, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71160-71161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23240]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

[FAI N03]


Federal Acquisition Institute/Defense Acquisition University 
Vendor Meeting

AGENCY: Office of the Chief Acquisition Officer, General Services 
Administration (GSA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Acquisition Institute (FAI) and the Defense 
Acquisition University (DAU) will hold

[[Page 71161]]

a vendor meeting to provide information on shared initiatives and 
activities, as well as recent policy developments in the area of 
acquisition training. FAI and DAU work together to address many of the 
acquisition workforce training needs of the Federal Government. 
Partnering with DAU enables FAI to build upon existing DAU training, 
develop Governmentwide curriculum, and promote a cohesive and agile 
workforce.
    FAI will describe plans and requirements for training-related 
services under the Acquisition Workforce Training Fund (AWTF). Of 
particular interest to vendors is a solicitation for core acquisition 
training that FAI plans to issue soon.
    DAU will discuss plans for the redesign of Contracting (CON) Level 
2 courses.

DATES: The meeting will be held December 9, 2005, from 10:00 a.m. to 12 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at GSA's auditorium located at 1800 
F Street, NW., Washington, DC. Register bye-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#137e72617a723d7b76617d727d777669537460723d747c65"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6d000c1f040c4305081f030c030908172d0a1e0c430a021b">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (703) 558-4795.

WHO SHOULD ATTEND? Training developers, vendors with Commercial-off-
the-Shelf (COTS) training products, vendors with capabilities related 
to the full Instructional System Design (ISD) methodologies, and 
acquisition training experts.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Maria Hernandez, by phone at 703-
558-4795, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dfb2beadb6bef1b7baadb1beb1bbbaa59fb8acbef1b8b0a9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6f020e1d060e41070a1d010e010b0a152f081c0e41080019">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 18, 2005.
Pat Brooks,
Director,Office of National and RegionalAcquisition Development.
[FR Doc. 05-23240 Filed 11-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### HENRY LANCE MOORE, by his Next Friend, CLYDE H. MOORE v. CHARLES THOMAS BROOKS, by his Guardian Ad Litem CARROLL F. GARDNER, and SEBERT MONROE BROOKS. and WILLIAM ALEX MILLER, by his Next Friend, THERON O. MILLER v. CHARLES THOMAS BROOKS, by his Guardian Ad Litem CARROLL F. GARDNER, and SEBERT M. BROOKS.

(Filed 16 December, 1964.)

Automobiles § 41n—

Plaintiff! passengers were injured when defendant driver struck a mule on the highway at nighttime while driving 50 to 55 miles per hour. The evidence tended to show that the driver avoided striking one mule by swerving to the left, then drove back on his right side of the highway without slackening speed and did not see the second mule until too late to avoid the collision. *Held:*The evidence was sufficient to be submitted to the jury on the issue of negligence.

Appeal by defendants from *McLaughlin,*</., September, 1964 Civil Session, Sueey Superior Court.

The two minor plaintiffs, through their respective Next Friends, instituted these civil actions to recover damages they sustained by reason of the actionable negligence of Charles Thomas Brooks in the operation of a family purpose automobile owned by the defendant Sebert M. Brooks. The plaintiffs were guest passengers in the vehicle when the driver wrecked it on Rural Road No. 1001, west of Dobson, in Surry County. The driver, according to his own evidence, was driving at night, 50 to 55 miles per hour, “When I first saw the mule it was four or five car lengths, or possibly six in front of me and I then swerved to the left. I did not run off the highway. Just as I came around that mule and then drove back into my lane, I was right on the other one before I saw it. That mule was standing facing west in *237my lane of the highway and I was right on top of the second mule when I saw it and hit it.”

The highway patrolman testified he found debris all over the road. The mule had been knocked or carried 231 feet and the automobile had stopped 282 feet from the debris. The mule was killed. The vehicle was a total loss. The two plaintiffs were injured.

The jury found the defendant was negligent and awarded the plaintiff Moore $5,000.00, and the plaintiff Miller $3,500.00, for their injuries. From judgments on the verdict, the defendants appealed.

*Blalock & Swanson by C. Orville Light for plaintiff Henry Lance Moore, appellee.*

*James J. Bandleman and M. Neil Finger for plaintiff William Alex Miller, appellee.*

*Barber & Gardner by John C. W. Gardner, Wilson Barber for defendant appellants.*

PeR CüRiam.

The evidence permitted an inference of speed in excess of that warranted by conditions on the highway. After discovering the first mule in the road, the driver did not reduce speed, but whipped around the mule back into his traffic lane and was “on top of the second mule” before he saw it. Up to that time he had not reduced speed.

The evidence fully justified the jury’s findings. Assignments of error other than to the failure to nonsuit are formal and require no discussion. In the judgments below, we find

No error.
#### STATE v. DAVIS

No. 64 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 696.

Petition by Defendant Davis for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 7 October 1975.
Case 1:07-cv-03253-JGK     Document 5      Filed 07/09/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-03253-JGK     Document 5      Filed 07/09/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-03253-JGK     Document 5      Filed 07/09/2007     Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56047-56048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4847]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Newspapers Used for Publication of Legal Notice of Appealable 
Decisions for the Northern Region; Northern Idaho, Montana, North 
Dakota, and portions of South Dakota and Eastern Washington

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 56048]]

SUMMARY: This notice lists the newspapers that will be used by all 
Ranger Districts, Forests, Grasslands, and the Regional Office of the 
Northern Region to publish legal notices for public comment and 
decisions subject to appeal and predecisional administrative review 
under 36 CFR 215, 217, and 218. The intended effect of this action is 
to inform interested members of the public which newspapers will be 
used to publish legal notices for public comment or decisions; thereby 
allowing them to receive constructive notice of a decision, to provide 
clear evidence of timely notice, and to achieve consistency in 
administering the appeals process.

DATES: Publication of legal notices in the listed newspapers will begin 
with decisions subject to appeal that are made on or after October 1, 
2007. The list of newspapers will remain in effect until another notice 
is published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Acting Regional Appeals Coordinator; 
Northern Region; P.O. Box 7669; Missoula, Montana 59807. Phone: (406) 
329-3381.
    The newspapers to be used are as follows:

Northern Regional Office

    Regional Forester decisions in Montana: The Missoulian, Great Falls 
Tribune, and The Billings Gazette.
    Regional Forester decisions in Northern Idaho and Eastern 
Washington: Coeur d'Alene Press and Lewiston Tribune.
    Regional Forester decisions in North Dakota: Bismarck Tribune.
    Regional Forester decisions in South Dakota: Bismarck Tribune.
    Beaverhead/Deerlodge NF - Montana Standard.
    Bitterroot NF - Ravalli Republic.
    Clearwater NF - Lewiston Tribune.
    Custer NF - Billings Gazette (Montana).
    Rapid City Journal (South Dakota).
    Dakota Prairie Grasslands - Bismarck Tribune (North and South 
Dakota).
    Flathead NF - Daily Inter Lake.
    Gallatin NF - Bozeman Chronicle.
    Helena NF - Independent Record.
    Idaho Panhandle NFs - Coeur d'Alene Press.
    Kootenai NF - Daily Inter Lake.
    Lewis & Clark NF - Great Falls Tribune.
    Lolo NF - Missoulian.
    Nez Perce NF - Lewiston Tribune.
    Supplemental notices may be placed in any newspaper, but time 
frames/deadlines will be calculated based upon notices in newspapers of 
record listed above.

    Dated: September 25, 2007.
Kathleen A. McAllister,
Deputy Regional Forester.
[FR Doc. 07-4847 Filed 10-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
---

---

Exhibit 14(a)

# Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of DirectorsECtel Ltd.Petach TikvaIsrael

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-83736) of ECtel Ltd. of our
report dated May 15, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Ectel Ltd.
as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2004, which report appears in the report on Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

Somekh ChaikinCertified Public Accountants (Israel)  A member of KPMG International

Tel Aviv, Israel June 27,
2005



---

---
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
                         388 Greenwich Street, 7th Floor
                          New York, New York 10013-2396




February 23, 2001


Bridgewater  Associates, Inc.
1 Glendinning Place
Westport, CT  06880

Attention:        Ms. Giselle Wagner,
                  Chief  Operating Officer

Re:      SB DIVERSIFIED 2000 FUTURES FUND L.P.
         SB DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND LP.

Dear  Ms. Wagner:

As I discussed with Joe Quinn  yesterday,  the Board of Directors has decided to
terminate  the  accounts  traded  by  Bridgewater  Associates.  As such,  please
liquidate  all of your  positions  in the above  referenced  funds in an orderly
fashion immediately. We would like to be flat by Wednesday, February 28, 2001.

Please acknowledge  receipt and acceptance by signing a copy and returning it to
me by fax at 212-723-8985.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 212- 723-5416.  Thank you.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT LLC.



Daniel R. McAuliffe
Director


DAD/sr


By:   ________________________________________       Date: ______________
         Signature

By:   _________________________________Title:_____________________________
         Print
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS [LOGO]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                   PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                                   Chartered Accountants
                                                   99 Bank Street, Suite 700
                                                   Ottawa, Ontario
                                                   Canada K1P 1K6
                                                   Telephone +1 (613) 237 3702
                                                   Facsimile +1 (613) 237 3963








Exhibit 23.1








                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated July 25,
2003 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Workstream Inc. in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Workstream Inc. for the year ended May 31, 2003.




/s/ PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
    PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chartered Accountants
Ottawa, Canada




PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
and the other member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each
of which is a separate and independent legal entity.
Case 1:05-cv-05098-MBM Document 2 Filed 05/27/2005 Page 1 of 1