alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Kellwood
Company and subsidiaries Condensed Consolidated Balance sheet at July 31,
1997, and from the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings and Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended July 31, 1997,
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                          19,421
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  258,168
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,328
<INVENTORY>                                    362,120
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               662,113
<PP&E>                                         180,360
<DEPRECIATION>                                 118,182
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 915,499
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          405,539
<BONDS>                                        106,480
<COMMON>                                       106,032
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     250,855
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   915,499
<SALES>                                        400,604
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               400,604
<CGS>                                          321,602
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  321,602
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                59,699
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,141
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,887
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,416
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,216
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,216
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
        

</TABLE>
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF     Document 11      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF     Document 11      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF     Document 11      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 3 of 3
#### STATE v. TEAT

No. 38 PC.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 484.

Petition' for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of. Appeals denied 3 September 1974.
#### GEORGE v. OPPORTUNITIES, INC.

No. 62 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 732.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 7 October 1975.
CERTIFICATION
   2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: August 10, 2011
    /s/ Robert A. Frist, Jr.Robert A. Frist, Jr.Chief Executive Officer
exv10w3






Exhibit 10.3




SANDERSON FARMS, INC. AND AFFILIATES

EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN

(As Amended and Restated Effective August 1, 2006)



WHEREAS, Sanderson Farms Inc. (the “Corporation”) maintains the Sanderson Farms, Inc. and
Affiliates Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of the employees of the
Corporation and its participating affiliates;



WHEREAS, Section 12.1 of the Plan provides that the Corporation, through action of its Board of
Directors, may amend the Plan at any time; and



WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Plan in certain respects.



NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that, effective August 1, 2006, the Plan shall be amended as follows:





	 	1.	 	Restate 6.3(f) in its entirety as follows:






	(f)	 	If a portion of a Participant’s Accounts are forfeited under (c) or (d) above, Qualifying
Employer Securities allocated to the Participant’s Stock Account pursuant to Section 8.4
hereof must be forfeited only after other Account assets.






	 	2.	 	Restate Section 7.2(a) in its entirety as follows:






	(a)	 	Distribution of a Participant’s vested Account balances shall be in the form of (i)
Qualifying Employer Securities, with the value of any fractional share paid in cash, to the
extent of the shares of Qualifying Employer Securities allocated to the Participant’s
vested Stock Account, and (ii) cash, to the extent of cash allocated to the Participant’s
vested Cash Account; provided, however, that the Participant shall have the right to demand
that his Account balances be distributed in whole shares of Qualifying Employer Securities,
with the value of any fractional shares paid in cash.






	 	3.	 	Restate Section 7.12(c) in its entirety as follows:
	 
	 	4.	 	 






	An 	in-service distribution under this Section shall be distributed in whole shares of
Qualifying Employer Securities, with the value of any fractional share paid in cash, and
cash in proportion to the Participant’s Stock Account balance and Cash Account balance;
provided, however, that the Participant shall have the right to demand that his Account
balances be distributed in whole shares of Qualifying Employer Securities, with the value
of any fractional share paid in cash. An election for distribution of Accounts pursuant to
this Section shall not terminate the Participant’s right to participate in allocations of
Contributions or Forfeitures hereunder.





               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment to the Sanderson Farms, Inc.
and Affiliates Employee Stock Ownership Plan on this 23rd day of July, 2009.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	SANDERSON FARMS, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

###### Office of Research and Development

# AGENCY:

Office of Research and Development, VA.

# ACTION:

Notice of Government Owned Invention Available for Licensing.

# SUMMARY:

The invention listed below is owned by the U.S. Government as represented by the Department of Veterans Affairs, and is available for licensing in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 207 and 37 CFR part 404 and/or Cooperative Research and Development Act (CRADA) Collaboration under 15 U.S.C. 3710a to achieve expeditious commercialization of results of Federally-funded research and development. Foreign patents are filed on selected inventions to extend market coverage for U.S. companies and may also  be available for licensing.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Technical and licensing information on the invention may be obtained by writing to: Amy E. Centanni, Department of Veterans Affairs, Director, Technology Transfer Program, Office of Research and Development, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420; fax: 202-254-0255; e-mail at:                         *amy.centanni@mail.va.gov.*

Any request for information should include the Number and Title for the relevant invention as indicated below. Issued patents may be obtained from the Commissioner of Patents, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC 20231.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The invention available for licensing is: VHA No. 03-127 “Cyclic Peptides of MUC1 and Methods of use Thereof.”

      ( print page 71609)    
Dated: November 22, 2005.

Gordon H. Mansfield,

Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

[FR Doc. 05-23448 Filed 11-28-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kansas Gas and Electric Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the Report),
which this certification accompanies, William B. Moore, in my capacity as Chairman of the Board and President (Principle Executive Officer) of the Company, and Mark A. Ruelle, in my capacity as Vice President and Treasurer (Principle Financial and
Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|      |  |              |  |  |  |     |  |                                    
|----- |  | ------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------
|Date: |  | May 10, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ William B. Moore               
|      |  |              |  |  |  |     |  | William B. Moore,                  
|      |  |              |  |  |  |     |  | Chairman of the Board and President
|      |  |              |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)      



|      |  |              |  |  |  |     |  |                                             
|----- |  | ------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | May 10, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark A. Ruelle                          
|      |  |              |  |  |  |     |  | Mark A. Ruelle,                             
|      |  |              |  |  |  |     |  | Vice President and Treasurer                
|      |  |              |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 15-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 15-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 15-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 15-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 15-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 15-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 15-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 15-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 15-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 15-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 15-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 11 of 11
#### In the Matter of Derek A. Szemplinski, an Infant, by Diane R. Szemplinski, His Mother and Natural Guardian, to Change His Name to Derek A. Raccuglia.

Civil Court of the City of New York, Special Term, Richmond County,

December 12,1986

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Anthony R. Caputo*for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Alexander Graves, J.

This is an application to change the surname of a 3 Vi-year-old child to that of a person who is asserted to be his father *163and who is now deceased. It appears that the child’s mother (who makes the application) and the asserted father were married on March 16, 1983, the child was born on September 19, 1983, and the asserted father died on October 11, 1985. The child’s birth certificate sets forth that the child’s surname is the same as the mother’s maiden name. The certificate does not set forth the name of the father nor the marriage name of the mother. The grounds for the application are stated to be that the infant "wishes to assume the name of his deceased father * * * and to otherwise permit said infant to share and to participate in Social Security benefits made available upon the decease of his father”.

It is rather obvious to the court that petitioner mother anticipates that, when applying for decedent’s benefits under Social Security, no question will be raised if the infant’s surname is the same as the surname of the deceased. It is not the proper function of a legal change of name to enable one to avoid inquiry by a government agency responsible for dispersing public funds which, during the period of the infant’s minority, may well total a substantial amount. Let the Social Security Administration inquire. If it can be established that the infant is indeed the child of the deceased, the proper benefits will no doubt be authorized. If said kinship cannot be established, the benefits should not be paid.

The petition is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350



In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, (the "Report") by Tankless Systems Worldwide, Inc., (formerly Elution Technologies, Inc.), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



1.

The Report complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Registrant.





Dated:  April 21, 2004



/s/ Thomas Kreitzer



Name:  Thomas Kreitzer

Title: Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Thomas Kreitzer



Name:  Thomas Kreitzer

Title: Principal Accounting Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Kellwood Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned hereby individually certify that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

         and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
         of the Company as of and for the period covered in the Report.

/s/ Hal J. Upbin
--------------------------------------------------
Hal J. Upbin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

September 3, 2004



/s/ W. Lee Capps, III
--------------------------------------------------
W. Lee Capps, III, Executive Vice President
Finance and Chief Financial Officer

September 3, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kellwood
Company and will be retained by Kellwood Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be
considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 9, 2023

No. 04-22-00671-CR

Taylor Eugene KREGEAR,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-2572-CR-C

Honorable Jessica Crawford, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a brief and motion to withdraw pursuant to 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to 

raise on appeal. Counsel certifies he served copies of the brief and motion on appellant, 

informed appellant of his right to review the record and file his own brief, informed appellant of 

his right to seek discretionary review should the court of appeals declare the appeal frivolous, 

and provided appellant with a form for requesting the record and explained to appellant the 

procedure for obtaining the record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2014); Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 

924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). As of the date of this order, 

appellant has not filed the record-request motion provided to him by his counsel. 

If appellant desires to file a pro se brief, we ORDER that he do so by February 8, 2023. 

If appellant files a timely pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than thirty 

days after appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court.

We further ORDER the motion to withdraw filed by appellant’s counsel held in 

abeyance pending further order of the court. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80–82 (1988) 

(holding that motion to withdraw should not be ruled on before appellate court independently 

reviews record to determine whether counsel’s evaluation that appeal is frivolous is sound); 

Schulman v. State, 252 S.W.3d 403, 410–11 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (same). 

Entered on this 9th day of January 2023.
PER CURIAM

Attested to: ________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

Clerk of Court
.- :-- T..-,. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ,I 8. 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

............................................................... S 

IN RE: Fosamax Products Liability : 

Lltlgation 

1:06-md-1789 (JFK) 

Order -------.--------------------------- X 

This Document Relates to: All Actions : 

--.--------.----------------.-.---- X 

JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District Judge: 

Anthony G. Brazil's application for admission pro hac 

vice is DENIED because the applicant has not submitted a 

certificate of good standing "which has been issued within thirty 

(30) days" by a court in the state to which he is a member of the 

bar, as requlred by Rule 1.3(c) of the Local Rules of the United 

States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of 

New York. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: New York, New York 

November LL, 2007 

JOHN F. KEENAN '. 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 16 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, STACIE BRYCE FELDMAN, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of Defendant, 

PAX Ventures, LLC’s Answer has been furnished by U.S. mail and by email delivery on 

July 6, 2007, to: 

J.Justin Griffin, Esq. 

64 Oriole Street 

Pearl River, New York 10965 

jj10@hotmail.com

Brian Ku, Esq. 

Ku & Mussman, P.A. 

11098 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 301 

Miami, Florida 33161 

brian@kumussman.com

Dated: July 6, 2007 

 New York, New York S/ Stacie Bryce Feldman 

Stacie Bryce Feldman, Esq. (SF2055) 

Case 1:07-cv-03273-RJH Document 7 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 1 of 1
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
AMERICAN PATENTS LLC, Appellant

v.

UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC, Appellee

______________________

2021

- 1635

______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019

- 00482.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

L ARRY D. T HOMPSON
, J R
., Antonelli, Harrington & Thompson, LLP, Houston, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by M ATTHEW J AMES A NTONELLI
, Z ACHARIAH H ARRINGTON
, R EHAN M. S AFIULLAH

.

D EBRA J ANECE M C C OMAS
, Haynes & Boone, LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for appellee. Also r epresented by D AVID L.
M C C OMBS ; R AGHAV B AJAJ
, D AVID W. O'B RIEN , Austin, TX; A NGELA O LIVER
, Washington, DC; A SHRAF F AWZY
, Case: 21-1635 Document: 54 Page: 1 Filed: 03/10/2022J ONATHAN R UDOLPH K OMINEK S TROUD , Unified Patents, LLC, Chevy Chase, MD.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN
, L OURIE
, and T ARANTO
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

March 10, 2022 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 21-1635 Document: 54 Page: 2 Filed: 03/10/2022
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-41 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-41 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-41 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 3 of 3
#### EVANS v. EVANS

No. 83.

Case below: 12 N.C. App. 17.

Motion of counsel for defendant to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 7 September 1971.