alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132383 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

NATHAN R. OPHOFF, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices 

v SC: 132383 

 COA: 267921 

Macomb CC: 04-001225-NP 

HOME DEPOT, assumed name for HOME 

DEPOT USA, INC., and JAMES HARDIE

BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC., 

Defendants, 

Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees,

and 

RIVERSIDE EXTERIORS, L.L.C., 

 Third-Party Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 26, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0122 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 29, 2007 

 Clerk
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NO. WR-86,503-01

EX P ARTE BOB BY JOE HI CK MAN, Appl icant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 09-02-01908-C R-(1) IN THE 9T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM MONTG OMERY COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Art i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of injury to a child and sente nced to se ven year s’ imprisonment. Applicant contends that he was denied the opportunity to file an appea l. Counsel filed an aff idavit with the trial court. The trial court found h er aff idavit cre dible and deter mined that Applicant did not ha

ve the opportunity to f

ile an appea l. We conclude that there was a brea kdown in the sy stem. Ex parte Riley , 193 S.W .3d 900, 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).2

We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-ti m e appea l of the judgme nt of conviction in Cause No. 09-02-01908- CR-(1) fr om the 9th District Court of Montgome ry County
. Applicant is order ed return ed to that time at which he may g ive a written notice of a

ppeal so that he may

then, with the aid of c ounsel, obtain a mea ningf ul appeal. It appea rs that Appli cant is repr esente d by counsel. W ithin ten days of the is suance of this opinion, the trial court shall deter mine if Applicant is repr esente d by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indigent and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall immediately

appoint an attorne y

to repre sent Applicant on dire ct appe al. All time limit s shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc e had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosec ute an appea l, he must take aff

irmative steps to file a written notice of appea l in the trial court within 30 day s afte r the mandate of

this Court i ssues. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Crimin al Justice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Marc h 29, 2017 Do not publish
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-12 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-12 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-12 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### HOCKADAY v. MORSE

No. 336P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 109.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 July 1982.
✎AO 85 (Rev. 8/98) Notice, Consent, and Order of Reference — Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

District of

NOTICE, CONSENT, AND ORDER OF REFERENCE —

EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES

Plaintiff MAGISTRATE JUDGE

V.

Case Number:

Defendant

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

TO EXERCISE JURISDICTION

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(c), and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73, you are notified that a United States

magistrate judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or nonjury trial,

and to order the entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by a magistrate judge is, however, permitted only if all

parties voluntarily consent.

You may, without adverse substantive consequences, withhold your consent, but this will prevent the court’s jurisdiction

from being exercised by a magistrate judge. If any party withholds consent, the identity of the parties consenting or withholding

consent will not be communicated to any magistrate judge or to the district judge to whom the case has been assigned.

An appeal from a judgment entered by a magistrate judge shall be taken directly to the United States court of appeals for

this judicial circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of this district court.

CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73, the parties in this case consent to have a United

States magistrate judge conduct any and all proceedings in this case, including the trial, order the entry of a final judgment, and

conduct all post-judgment proceedings.

Party Represented Signatures Date

ORDER OF REFERENCE

IT IS ORDERED that this case be referred to

United States Magistrate Judge, to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

§636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73.

Date United States District Judge

NOTE: RETURN THIS FORM TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT ONLY IF ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED 

ON THIS FORM TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Case 7:07-cv-03509-SCR-LMS Document 4-3 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
       Name of subsidiary                    Place of incorporation              Percent Owned
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                          <C>                                 <C>
Las Vegas Reservation Systems, Inc.*            Nevada, USA                        100.0%

Professional Travel Services, Inc.*             Nevada, USA                        100.0%

Travelscape.com, Inc.*                          Delaware, USA                      100.0%

Travelscape.com, Inc.                           Nevada, USA                        100.0%

Expedia Canada Corp.                            Ottawa, Canada                     100.0%

Expedia France s.a.s.                           Paris, France                      100.0%

Expedia s.a.                                    Brussels, Belgium                  100.0%

Expedia.com GmbH                                Munich, Germany                    100.0%

Expedia.com Limited                             London, United Kingdom             100.0%
</TABLE>

* wholly owned by Travelscape.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation
#### STATE v. CONARD

No. 11 P 82.

Case below: 55 N.C. App. 63.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 March 1982. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 3 March 1982.
EXHIBIT 32
 LANCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ David V. Singer
    
    
    
    /s/ Rick D. PuckettDavid V. Singer 
President and Chief Executive Officer
October 30, 2009
    
    
    
    Rick D. Puckett
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary
October 30, 2009
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 1 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 2 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 3 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 4 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 5 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 6 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 7 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 8 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 9 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 10 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 11 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 12 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 13 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 14 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 15 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 16 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 17 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 18 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-2 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 19 of 19
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1979 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide for the minimum size 

of crews of freight trains, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 26, 2019 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. WARREN, Mr. 

KING, Ms. SMITH, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. BROWN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and 

Mr. MERKLEY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide for the 

minimum size of crews of freight trains, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Freight Act of 

5 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FREIGHT TRAIN CREW SIZE. 

7 (a) AMENDMENT.—Subchapter II of chapter 201 of 

8 title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

9 end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1979 IS

1 ‘‘§ 20169. Freight train crew size 

2 ‘‘Beginning on the date that is 30 days after the date 

3 of the enactment of the Safe Freight Act of 2019, no 

4 freight train or light engine used in connection with the 

5 movement of freight may be operated without a crew con6 sisting of at least 2 individuals of whom— 

7 ‘‘(1) at least 1 crew member is certified under 

8 regulations promulgated by the Federal Railroad 

9 Administration as a locomotive operator pursuant to 

10 section 20135; and 

11 ‘‘(2) at least 1 other crew member is certified 

12 under regulations promulgated by the Federal Rail13 road Administration as a conductor pursuant to sec14 tion 20163.’’. 

15 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec16 tions for chapter 201 of title 49, United States Code, is 

17 amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘20169. Freight train crew size.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-03322-LBS Document 1 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03322-LBS Document 1 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03322-LBS Document 1 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03322-LBS Document 1 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 4 of 4
#### STATE v. STANLEY

No. 12 PC.

Case below: 24 N.C. App. 323.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 4 March 1975.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 14, 2015

No. 04

- 15

- 00296

- CV

IN RE Stacey SCOTT

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On May 13, 2015

, relator Stacey Scott filed a petition for writ of mandamus an d motion

for emergency stay pending a ruling on the mandamus petition. The court has considered the

petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and mo tion for emergency stay are DENIED. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on May 14, 2015

.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Just ice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14th day of May, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk o f Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Ca use No. 2013

- CV

- 0227, styled Patrick D enn, Attorney in Fact for Juanit a Denn v.

Stacey Jo Scott and All Occupants , pending in the County Court at Law, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable

Robin V. Dwyer presiding.
Case 1:07-cv-03354-SAS     Document 9      Filed 04/30/2008     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03354-SAS     Document 9      Filed 04/30/2008     Page 2 of 2
#### BURKHIMER v. GEALY

No. 46 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 450.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 May 1979.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

I, David D. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of Koss Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:

 

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ David D. Smith                 |
|--------|------------------------------------|
|   | David D. Smith                     |
|   | Executive Vice President and Chief |
|   | Financial Officer                  |
|   | Date: October 28, 2011        |

 

 

Note:  This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

1

----
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1783 

To establish responsibility for the International Outfall Interceptor. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2019 

Ms. MCSALLY (for herself and Ms. SINEMA) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To establish responsibility for the International Outfall 

Interceptor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nogales Wastewater 

5 Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INTERNATIONAL OUTFALL INTERCEPTOR REPAIR, 

7 OPERATIONS, AND MAINTENANCE. 

8 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

9 (1) AGREEMENT.—The term ‘‘Agreement’’ 

10 means the memorandum of agreement between the 

11 United States Section of the International Boundary 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1783 IS

1 and Water Commission and the City of Nogales, Ar2 izona, dated January 20, 2006. 

3 (2) CITY.—The term ‘‘City’’ means the City of 

4 Nogales, Arizona. 

5 (3) NOGALES SANITATION PROJECT.—The term 

6 ‘‘Nogales sanitation project’’ means the project 

7 owned by the City and the United States Section of 

8 the International Boundary and Water Commission 

9 and includes— 

10 (A) the International Outfall Interceptor 

11 (IOI) and the trunkline; and 

12 (B) the Nogales International Wastewater 

13 Treatment Plant (NIWTP). 

14 (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con15 gress that, pursuant to the Act of July 27, 1953 (22 

16 U.S.C. 277d–10 et seq.), and notwithstanding the Agree17 ment, an equitable proportion of the costs of operation and 

18 maintenance of the Nogales sanitation project to be con19 tributed by the City should be based on the average daily 

20 volume of wastewater originating from the City. 

21 (c) CAPITAL COSTS EXCLUDED.—Pursuant to the 

22 Agreement and the Act of July 27, 1953 (22 U.S.C. 

23 277d–10 et seq.), the City shall have no obligation to con24 tribute to any capital costs of repairing or upgrading the 

25 Nogales sanitation project. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 1783 IS

1 (d) OVERCHARGES.—Notwithstanding the Agree2 ment, the United States Section of the International 

3 Boundary and Water Commission shall not charge the 

4 City after the date of enactment of this Act for operations 

5 and maintenance costs in excess of an equitable proportion 

6 of the costs, as described in subsection (b). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### STATE v. RAMSEY

No. 41PC

Case below: 50 NC App 746

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 April 1981. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 7 April 1981.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Cal R. Hoagland, Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer of interWAVE Communications International, Ltd.(the “Company”) hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheCompany’s Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period endedJune 30, 2004, and to which this certification is attached asExhibit 32.2 (the “Periodic Report Amendment”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report Amendment fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Date:  October 28, 2004 | /s/ CAL R. HOAGLAND                                |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Cal R. Hoagland                                    |
|                         | Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### FORCE v. SANDERSON

No. 240P82.

Case below: 56 N.C. App. 423.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 13 July 1982.
Exhibit 32.1

       CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
                              2002


      In  connection  with the Annual Report of  Raike  Financial
Group,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
December  31,  2004  as  filed with the Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), William  J.  Raike,
III,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  and  Melissa  L.
Whitley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do
each  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  that
to his and her knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully complies with  the  requirements  of
     Section  13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act  of
     1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
     in  all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and
     results of operations of the Company.



/s/ William J. Raike, III
-------------------------------------
William J. Raike, III
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 23, 2005



/s/ Melissa L. Whitley
-------------------------------------
Melissa L. Whitley
Chief Financial Officer
March 23, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                              7
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15,127
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                     4,283
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               20,837 
<PP&E>                                         27,142
<DEPRECIATION>                                 17,615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 31,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,041
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        6,550
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   31,051
<SALES>                                        53,437 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               53,437
<CGS>                                          41,003         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  41,003 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                9,525
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                136
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,805
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,122
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,683
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,683 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .68
        


</TABLE>