alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 226 (Friday, November 25, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 71175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23232]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 05-154]


NASA Advisory Committee; Renewal of NASA's Aerospace Safety 
Advisory Panel Charter

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of Renewal and amendment of the Charter of the Aerospace 
Safety Advisory Panel.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to sections 14(b)(1) and 9(c) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), and after consultation with the 
Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, the 
Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has 
determined that a renewal of the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel is in 
the public interest in connection with the performance of duties 
imposed upon NASA by law. The structure and duties of this panel is 
unchanged.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. P. Diane Rausch, Office of 
External Relations, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 
Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-4510.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Information regarding the Aerospace Safety 
Advisory Panel is available on the world wide web at: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/codeq/asap/index.htm.

    Dated: November 17, 2005.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 05-23232 Filed 11-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-U
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       UT
<CIK> 0000060549
<NAME> LOUISVILLE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                    PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                         1,709,144
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                           1,092
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                              317,407
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             68,651
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2,096,294
<COMMON>                                            424,334 <F1>
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                               106 <F2>
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                 260,790
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                      685,230
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                          95,328
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                626,800
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                        0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                            0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                             0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                 0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                               0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                          0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                      688,936
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                     2,096,294
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                           664,618
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                 53,485
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                          491,758
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                          545,243
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                             119,375
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  (23,466)<F3>
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                       95,909
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             27,629
<NET-INCOME>                                         68,280
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           3,400
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                        64,880
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             63,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            25,891
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                              140,071
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
<FN>
<F1>Includes common stock expense of $836.
<F2>Represents unrealized gain/loss on marketable securities,
    net of taxes.
<F3>Includes $34,134 Merger costs to achieve.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### BENTLEY v. LANGLEY

No. 200 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 20.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 March 1979.
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-13-00991-CR

JOSE FRANCO CAMPUZANO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 176th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1315240).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on October 

15, 2013. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly 

raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible 

error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered March 26, 2015.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Massengale. Opinion 

delivered by Justice Jennings.
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    
    /s/
    
    John B. Gerlach, Jr.John B. Gerlach, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 9, 2006By:
    
    /s/
    
    John L. BoylanJohn L. BoylanChief Financial OfficerFebruary 9, 2006
 24
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE DIANA CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR
THE 40 WEEKS ENDED JANUARY 6, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-06-1996
<CASH>                                            3473
<SECURITIES>                                      2204
<RECEIVABLES>                                    17650
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (500)
<INVENTORY>                                      11081
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 34765
<PP&E>                                            8956
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (4910)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   47636
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            14455
<BONDS>                                           8396
<COMMON>                                          5006
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       14639
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     47636
<SALES>                                         203493
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                203940
<CGS>                                           196087
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   196087
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  7518
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 788
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (853)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (853)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (853)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 1 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 2 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 3 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 4 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 5 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 6 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 7 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 8 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 9 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 10 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 11 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 12 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 13 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 14 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 15 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 16 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 17 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 18 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 40-2 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 19 of 19
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

DoD, Per Diem Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee.

# ACTION:

Notice of Revised Non-Foreign Overseas Per Diem Rates. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Per Diem Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee is publishing Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 255. This bulletin lists revisions in the per diem rates prescribed for U.S. Government employees for official travel in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands and Possessions of the United States. AEA changes announced in Bulletin Number 194 remain in effect. Bulletin Number 255 is being published in the                         **Federal Register**                         to assure that travelers are paid per diem at the most current rates.                    

# EFFECTIVE DATES:

October 1, 2007.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This document gives notice of revisions in per diem rates prescribed by the for non-foreign areas outside the continental United States. It supersedes Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 254. Distribution of Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletins by mail was discontinued. Per Diem Bulletins published periodically in the                     **Federal Register**                     now constitute the only notification of revisions in per diem rates to agencies and establishments outside the Department of Defense. For more information or questions about per diem rates, please contact your local travel office. The text of the Bulletin follows:                

Dated: September 24, 2007.

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 55184)          ( print page 55185)          ( print page 55186)          ( print page 55187)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 07-4782 Filed 9-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
----

|   | 1. | I      have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of Symyx Technologies,  Inc.; |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      annual report; |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      April 28, 2008 | By:    | /s/      Rex S. Jackson        |   |
|---------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                      |   | Rex      S. Jackson            |
|                      |   | Executive      Vice President, |
|                      |   | Chief      Financial Officer   |

----
#### STATE v. WRIGHT

No. 112 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 263.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 December 1975.
#### KIDDIE KORNER v. BOARD OF EDUCATION

No. 34 P 82.

Case below: 55 N.C. App. 134.

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 March 1982. Motion of defendant to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 3 March 1982.
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 4-2 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 16 of 16
5TAT£ 0FT£XA^> IM 1u£ 6oort ^ OF ^K\niMAL

To TrtE HOMoaAG>u£ 6odfVT OF 6RWIMAI. APPEALS Abe! Acosta, Clerk 

### ^HjUci £<iU5e, ^"0 te£pe*4"full$ pr^iirM Vs,6 Motion -vo 6o&j>««i Role ^3£bb o^ fV>c Te-*a5 Rl>W c* Appe\W PrcsLeclurc ai\<J \B\Mk>$MiC\ 

## W'.U 6W> +W ftWouliruy COURTOFCRiM^ALAPPEALS

_ . OCT 2 3 2315 Abel Acosta, Clerk Appellant \5 appealli^ his towi^fron \Vo<*\ -Hnd 11 ObtffcV 

### ^-<7ur+, (Ad\enoaf\ £ou/\fc^,7e*rtS, 6ai>5e Alo. ^0O-H6~6\, His rj*»red" ctppfezA wos die/iled ku tW ^.cwrt- o£ Appeals in Wado, Texas , COUrTl OFCRIMINALAPPEALS OCT 19 2015



### A<ppel\aAJr <W-3 not Ka\/£ detect Ha 6c7po> rv*^V>d \Q make 6op*»<r2 an^ »> \nh\acrft an&, Wiere&xc, DAa&le ioWzU£ o_n<^ /Aftk \©c h'i/^. 

### WHEkE^O^ti A^elW ow^6 VWH Wrti V>o*ocable £ocM araM 4-V\'^ pne^rori -Vo 5u5f-eA<i Ri>\£ ^^>6V>> oa^ app-eUaA^ to 5ob 

### Tse5p^6-f¥Uil^,
HÁGASE CARGO

La seguridad de los trabajadores durante la 

construcción de muros de bloques es importante

Recomendaciones para prevenir lesiones

Durante una ráfaga de 

viento de 33 millas por 

hora un muro de bloques 

de 24 pies de altura se 

derrumbó, lo que causó la 

muerte de un obrero y un 

instalador de cañerías y 

lesionó a un capataz de 

servicios públicos. 8'

Siga los diseños de ingeniería e instale 

apuntalamientos temporales adecuados

Elabore un plan para el apuntalamiento de los muros 

y capacite a los trabajadores para que sigan el plan

Establezca una zona de acceso limitado que 

corresponda a la altura de la pared más cuatro pies

Monitoree las velocidades del viento

Mantenga el apuntalamiento temporal en muros 

de más de ocho pies de altura, hasta que se hayan 

instalado elementos de soporte permanentes

Vea el Informe FACE 2014-02 

para obtener más información:

www.cdc.gov/spanish/niosh/face/face2014-02.html

Noviembre de 2020
#### STATE v. WALKER

No. 63 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 389.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 March 1976.
1The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendation of the

Honorable Sarah W. Hays, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of

Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-1091

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Western District of Missouri.

*

James L. Flippen, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: February 13, 2001

Filed: February 16, 2001

___________

Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, BOWMAN and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,

Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

James L. Flippen pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, an

offense established by 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (1994). As provided for in his plea

agreement, he appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. For reversal, he

argues that the District Court1 erred in finding that the officer who detained him and
-2-

discovered the firearm (a loaded .45 caliber Ruger) on his person had a reasonable,

articulable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot. Instead, Flippen contends, he was

simply a victim of racial profiling.

Having reviewed the case, we are satisfied that Flippen's claims lack substance

and that his motion to suppress was properly denied. We agree with the District Court,

for the reasons stated in that court's thorough and well-reasoned opinion, that the

investigative stop leading to discovery of the firearm was proper under Terry v. Ohio,

392 U.S. 1 (1968). No error of fact or law appears, and an opinion by this Court in this

well-traveled area of the law would add nothing of value to what the District Court has

written. Accordingly, without further discussion the order of the District Court is

AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

-% 

In re Fosamax Froducts Liability : 

Lit lgdt ion 

- - - - - - - - . .. - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X 

This Gocutnent Re2ates to: 

All Actions. ----.----------------------------- -X 

JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District 3udge: 

After considering the letters subinltted 

the !:our-t w:ll r,ot enter M~rck's propc~ed order regarding rases 

filed by BeatFe and Osbdrrt, LLP that involve less t!~an three 

zcntinuous years of Fosamax use. Whether fir not Fcsa~nax call cause 

ONJ in anyone before three years of use remains an open quest-ion 

that should be resolved uniformly on the basla of the scientific 

evidence generated a£ ter a f gll opporturli tls for dir;covery. 

Thc parties are directed tc7 agree upsn and submit to the 

Court by October 7, 20ila a case managemuilt order Froposlng: (1) a 

sckdule to con~plete all generic expert discovery In this MDL; and 

(2) a schedule for summary judqn-tent mot-ions. In the event that the 

parties cannot reach agreement, by the same date each shall submit 

~ts own PI-oposal dlcng with a letter brief In support of it, and 

appear for a conference in ~ourtrooni 20C on Octobei- 16, 2005 at 

1G:30 am. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: New York, New York 

September 9, 2008 

I 

1 

JOHN F. KEENAN 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03462-JFK Document 37 Filed 09/09/2008 Page 1 of 1
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 133111(19) Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 133111 COA: 274277 St. Clair CC: 05-001460-FH; 05-002669-FC ALBERT MARQUE-ELLIS DENNIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s May 30, 2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

p0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00180-CR

RON EASTON D/B/A ACE BAIL BONDS,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the County Court

Freestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5526

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Ron Easton d/b/a Ace Bail Bonds appealed the trial court’s entry of a 

default judgment. Appellant now files a motion to dismiss his appeal, stating that the 

appeal is moot because the trial court granted a motion for new trial and amended its 

judgment. 

The motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). 

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
Easton v. State of Texas Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted

Opinion delivered and filed July 16, 2015

[CV06]
Case 1:07-cv-03540-LTS-JCF     Document 23      Filed 08/11/2008     Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 April 11, 2014 

s0408 

Order 

 

Clerk

April 11, 2014 

148749 

 SC: 148749 

In re J. McCARRICK, Minor. COA: 317403 

Chippewa CC Family Division: 

13-014227-NA 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 16, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the September 16, 2013 and January 10, 2014 

orders of the Court of Appeals, and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

its plenary consideration of the respondent’s jurisdictional issue, especially in light of In 

re White, unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals, issued December 19, 

2013 (Docket No. 313770); In re McClain/Waters/Skinner, unpublished opinion per 

curiam of the Court of Appeals, issued December 20, 2011 (Docket No. 302460); and In 

re Klemkow, unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals, issued September 

16, 2010 (Docket No. 295488). We direct the Court of Appeals’ attention to the fact that 

we have also remanded In re McCarrick/Lamoreaux (Docket No. 148966) to the Court of 

Appeals for reconsideration of the same issue. 

 We do not retain jurisdiction.