alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MORGAN, ATTY. GENERAL v. POWER CO.

Nos. 56 and 28 PC.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 300.

Petition of Attorney General for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 24 September 1974. Motions of Utilities Comm. and Power Co. to dismiss appeal allowed 24 September 1974.

justice Lake

dissenting: It is my view that the appeal of the Attorney General in this case presents a substantial question of law, neither heretofore nor now determined by this Court, as to the authority of the Utilities Commission to grant, without a hearing, an interim increase in rates charged by a .public utility for its service, that the public interest requires a prompt determination of this question and that to continue the increased rates in effect pending further consideration thereof by the Utilities Commission subjects the users of the service to the risk of substantial legal and economic injury. For these réasons, it- is my view that the appeal should now be heard by this Court and should not be summarily dismissed as premature.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000

Commission File Number: 333-53859

Commercial Mortgage Acceptance Corporation issuer in
respect of Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 1999-C2
(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware      			13-3672337
(State or Other Juris-		(I.R.S. Employer
diction of Incorporation)     Identification No.)

Two World Financial Center, Building B 21st Floor,
New York, NY 10281
(Address of Principal Executive Office)

212-667-9300
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:     None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:     None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed  by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  X   No _

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.

Not applicable.

Aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of
the Registrant as of December 31, 2000.

Not applicable.

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31,
2000.

Not applicable.
#### SELBY v. TAYLOR

No. 321P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 119.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 July 1982.
Case 1:07-cv-03413-LAP Document 2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PrimeEnergy Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles E. Drimal Jr., Chief Executive Officer of PrimeEnergy Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Charles E. Drimal Jr.

-----------------------------

Chief Executive Officer

May 15, 2006

 

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PrimeEnergy Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Beverly A. Cummings, Chief Financial Officer of PrimeEnergy Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.

 

 

 

/s/ Beverly A. Cummings

------------------------------

Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2006
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2000 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove an institutional 

bias by making permanent the protection for recipients of home and 

community-based services against spousal impoverishment. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 27, 2019 

Mr. CASEY (for himself, Ms. SMITH, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. BROWN, Ms. STABENOW, and 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove 

an institutional bias by making permanent the protection 

for recipients of home and community-based services 

against spousal impoverishment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2000 IS

1 SECTION 1. MAKING PERMANENT THE PROTECTION 

2 UNDER MEDICAID FOR RECIPIENTS OF HOME 

3 AND COMMUNITY-BASED SERVICES AGAINST 

4 SPOUSAL IMPOVERISHMENT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1924(h)(1)(A) of the So6 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–5(h)(1)(A)) is amend7 ed by striking ‘‘or who (at the option of the State) is de8 scribed in section 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(VI)’’ and inserting 

9 the following: ‘‘or who, before October 1, 2019, at the op10 tion of the State, is described in section 

11 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(VI) or, beginning October 1, 2019, is 

12 eligible for medical assistance for home and community13 based services provided under subsection (c), (d), or (i) 

14 of section 1915, under a waiver approved under section 

15 1115, or who is eligible for such medical assistance by rea16 son of being determined eligible under section 

17 1902(a)(10)(C) or by reason of section 1902(f) or other18 wise on the basis of a reduction of income based on costs 

19 incurred for medical or other remedial care, or who is eligi20 ble for medical assistance for home and community-based 

21 attendant services and supports under section 1915(k)’’. 

22 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in section 

23 2404 of Public Law 111–148 (42 U.S.C. 1396r–5 note), 

24 section 1924 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r– 

25 5), or section 1902(a)(17) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

26 1396a(a)(17)) shall be construed as prohibiting a State 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2000 IS

1 from applying an income or resource disregard authorized 

2 under section 1902(r)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

3 1396a(r)(2))— 

4 (1) to the income or resources of individuals de5 scribed in section 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(VI) of such Act 

6 (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(10)(A)(ii)(VI)) (including a 

7 disregard of the income or resources of such individ8 ual’s spouse); or 

9 (2) on the basis of an individual’s need for 

10 home and community-based services authorized 

11 under subsection (c), (d), (i), or (k) of section 1915 

12 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396n) or under section 

13 1115 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1315). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### MACK TRUCKS, INC. v. W. B. LASATER.

(Filed 10 October 1962.)

Appeal by defendant from *Sink, E. J.,*March 12, 1962, Special “A” Term, Meciclenbueg Superior Court.

This civil action originated as a claim and delivery proceeding instituted by the plaintiff to recover a specifically described Mack truck upon which it held a conditional sales contract. The respondent executed a replevy bond. By stipulation of the parties the only disputed issue of fact is the reasonable market value of the truck on *773January 12,1960, when the replevy bond was filed. The jury answered $4,500. Judgment was drawn, fixing the rights of the parties based on the jury’s finding and taking into account stipulated matters. The defendant excepted and appealed.

*Francis M. Fletcher, Jr., for 'plaintiff, appellee.*

*Neill McK. Ross; Boyle, Alexander Wade, for defendant, appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The parties stipulated the vehicle was reasonably worth $3,000 on November 14, 1960. The plaintiff introduced evidence the reasonable market value shortly before the seizure was $5,500. Apparently the defendant’s son had been permitted to replevy the vehicle and retain possession until November 14, 1960. The defendant did not offer evidence. There is nothing in the record to indicate the vehicle was damaged or that its value changed other than by ordinary depreciation. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict. The record disclosed

No error.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT/SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Attorney: MYERS & GALIARDO, LLP

., .

DARRYL AMIKER

Plaintiff(s)

Index # 07 CV 3554 (PATTERSON)

-against -

Purchased May 3, 2007

THE CITY OF NY, ETAL

Defendant( s )

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF NEW YORK 55:

ANDERSON CHAN BEING DUL Y SWORN DEPOSES AND SAYS DEPONENT IS NOT A PARTY TO THIS ACTION, OVER THE AGE

OF EIGHTEEN YEARS AND RESIDES IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

That on May 17, 2007 at 01 :40 PM at

NARCOTIC BORO

MANHATTAN NORTH

1 POLICE PLAZA

ROOM 1100

NEW YORK, NY 10038

deponent served the within SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT on P.O. CHRISTIAN MCBREARTY therein named,

SUITABLE by delivering thereat a true copy of each to MR. PAYNE a person of suitable age and discretion. Said premises is

AGE Defendant's actual place of business within the state. He identified himself as the CO-WORKER of the Defendant.

Deponent further states that he describes the person actually served as follows:

Skin Color Weight (Approx)

BROWN

Hair Color

BALD

Age (Approx.)

40

Height (Approx.)

6'0 200

Sex

MALE

Deponent enclosed a copy of same in a postpaid wrapper properly addressed to the Defendant at the Defendant's actual

place of business at

MAILING

NARCOTIC BORO

MANHATTAN NORTH

1 POLICE PLAZA

ROOM 1100

NEW YORK, NY 10038

and deposited said wrapper in a post office or official depository under exclusive care and custody of the United States

Postal Service within New York State on May 17. 2007 by REGULAR FIRST CLASS MAIL in an envelope marked

PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL and not indicating on the outside thereof, by return address or otherwise, that the

communication is from an attorney or concerns an action against the person to be served.

Person spoken to was asked whether the Defendant was in the military service of the State of New York or the United

States and received a negative reply. Upon information and belief based upon the conversation and observation as

aforesaid deponent avers that the Defendant is not in the military service of the State of New York or the United States as

that term is defined in the statutes of the State of New York or the Federal Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act.

MILITARY

SERVICE

That at the time of such service deponent knew the person so served as aforesaid to be the same person mentioned and

described as the Defendant in this action.

\

Sworn to me on" Mav__1\2007

:L SMITH JONATHAN GRABER

..~ State of New York Notary Public, State of New York ~DERSON CHAN

No.01GR6156780 .

0- , ., ., ~ ~, Qualified in New York County License #: 1220482

Comm. Expires December 4, 2010 Invoice #: 440140

INC., 3RD FLOOR, 315 BROADWAY, NEW YORK, NY 10007- (212) 619-0728

JOELGRABER

Notary Public, State of New

No. 02GR4699723

Qualified in New York County

Comm. Expires February 10, 2010

UNITED PROCESS

Case 1:07-cv-03554-RPP Document 2 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 54698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4760]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of Evolution Global Capital Partners, Inc.; Order 
of Suspension of Trading

September 24, 2007.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that the 
market for the securities of Evolution Global Capital Partners, Inc. 
(``Evolution,'' trading symbol EGCA), may be reacting to manipulative 
forces or deceptive practices and that there is insufficient current 
public information about the issuer upon which an informed investment 
decision may be made, particularly concerning (1) The identity of and 
prior securities fraud judgments against persons who appear to be 
involved in the offer and sale, or in connection with the purchase or 
sale, of Evolution shares; (2) the financial performance and business 
prospects of Evolution; and (3) offerings to foreign investors and any 
restrictions on the resale of shares.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed 
company is suspended for the period of 9:30 a.m. EDT, September 24, 
2007 through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on October 5, 2007.

    By the Commission.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-4760 Filed 9-24-07; 1:11 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
#### EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION v. LACHMAN

No. 36 PC.

No. 146 (Fall Term).

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 368.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 3 November 1981.
#### MILLER v. HOUPE

No. 51 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 103.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 March 1977. Motion of plaintiffs to dismiss appeal allowed 7 March 1977.
#### STATE v. HUNTER

No. 77 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 465.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 March 1976. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 2 March 1976.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Form 10-Q of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation
(the "Company") for the period ending October 31, 2002, I, D. Michael Parker,
Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended October 31, 2002,
          fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in such Form 10-Q of the Company for the
          period ended October 31, 2002, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company.

Date:  December 13, 2002

                                                /s/ D. Michael Parker
                                                ------------------------------
                                                D. Michael Parker
                                                Senior Vice President, Finance
                                                and Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determine d that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________________________

No. 96-20599 (Summary Calendar)

__________________________________

JAN CHRISTOPHER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; JESSE BROWN, Secretary, Defendants-Appellees.

_______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

Houston Division (CA-H-95-453)

_______________________________________________

February 19, 1997 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * In this employment case, Plaintiff-Appellant Jan Christopher appeals the decision of the magistrate judge that granted Defendants-Appellees’ motion for summa ry judgment. Based on our
review of the record, the briefs submitted by the parties, and the memorandum and order of the magistrate judge, we find, as did the magistrate judge, that the record is devoid of evidence submitted2

b y Christopher in opposition to Defendants-Appellees’ motion fo r

summary judgment. In light of the conspicuous absence of any opposing evidence, we conclude that the magistrate judge properly granted Defendants-Appellees’ motion. For the foregoing reasons,
we affirm the order of the district court in full.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,769
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   94,652
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,629
<INVENTORY>                                     63,225
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               171,252
<PP&E>                                         215,614
<DEPRECIATION>                                  76,284
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 563,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          107,315
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       100,624
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   563,102
<SALES>                                        508,633
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               508,633
<CGS>                                          315,324
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  458,128
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     6
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,652
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,139
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,708
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .97
<FN>
<F1>trtytyu
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Third Quarter Report of The First Years, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
J. Sidman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: November 14, 2003            By: /S/ RONALD J. SIDMAN
                                       Ronald J. Sidman, Chief Executive Officer
                                       Chairman of the Board of Directors, and
                                       President

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The First Years Inc. and will be retained by The First Years Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### HALSEY v. CHOATE

No. 87 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 49.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 December 1975.
# National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day, 2005

On National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day, we pray for those lost on December 7, 1941, and we honor the courage of a generation of Americans who devoted themselves to one of the great missions in our country's history. After the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor took more than 2,400 American lives, millions of our citizens answered the call to defend our liberty, and the world witnessed the power of freedom to overcome tyranny.

Liberty's ultimate triumph was far from clear in the early days of World War II. When our country was attacked at Pearl Harbor, America was emerging from the Great Depression, and several nations had larger armies than the United States. In Asia and Europe, country after country had fallen before the armies of militaristic tyrants. However, the brave and determined men and women of our Nation maintained their faith in the power of freedom and democracy. They fought and won a world war against two of the most ruthless regimes the world has ever known. In the years since those victories, the power of freedom and democracy has transformed America's enemies in World War II into close friends.

Today, our goal is to continue to spread freedom and democracy and to secure a more peaceful world for our children and grandchildren. We are grateful to the men and women who are defending our flag and our freedom in the first war of the 21st century. These patriots are protecting our country and our way of life by upholding the tradition of honor, bravery, and integrity demonstrated by those who fought for our Nation in World War II. The service and sacrifice of our World War II veterans continue to inspire people across our country, and we remain deeply grateful for all that these heroes have done for the cause of freedom.

The Congress, by Public Law 103-308, as amended, has designated December 7 of each year as “National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day.”

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim December 7, 2005, as National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day. I encourage all Americans to observe this solemn occasion with appropriate ceremonies and activities. I urge all Federal agencies, interested organizations, groups, and individuals to fly the flag of the United States at half-staff this December 7 in honor of those who died as a result of their service at Pearl Harbor.                          ( print page 72064)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-eighth day of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth.

[FR Doc. 05-23550

Billing code 3195-01-P