# The Attorney General of Texas
November 30, 1978 JOHN L. HILL Attorney General
Honorable Peyton McKnight Senate Study to Replace AdValorem Taxes P. 0. Box12068 Austin, Texas 78711 Opinion No. H-1264 Re: Whether a tax on crude oil or onrefined products isa tax on motor fuels and special motor fuels. Dear Senator McKnight: You have requested our opinion regarding a proposed statute which would tax refinery production. Your first question is:

Would a tax imposed on the fair market value of refinery products, prior to their sale, use, transfer, or other disposition, be, as to that portion applicable to the value of motor fuels, considered a motor fuels tax which would be subject to the requirements ofArticles 9and 10ofTitle 122A,Taxation-General, R.C.S.? Chapters 9 and 10, title 122A, impose a tax on the “first sale, distribution, or use” of motor and special fuels. Attorney General Opinion WW-876(1960)(defining “first sale”). Tax.-Gen. arts. 9.02, 10.03. The motor fuel tax “shall be inlieu ofany other excise or occupation tax imposed

... on the sale, use, or distribution of motor fuel.” Tax.-Gen. art. 9.02(5). The proposed tax on refinery production would be before any “sale, use, transfer, or other disposition” of the motor fuels and therefore would not be a transaction which is taxable under chapters 9 or 10. Thus, the allocation provisions of those statutes would not apply to a refinery tax. However, article 8,section 7-a ofthe Texas Constitution provides inpart:

Subject to legislative appropriation, allocation and direction, all net revenues remaining after payment of all refunds allowed by law and expenses of collection derived from motor vehicle registration fees, and all taxes, except gross production and ad valorem taxes, on motor fuels and lubricants used to propel motor vehicles over public roadways, shall be used for the sole purpose of

... [public roads and highways];

P. 5007Honorable Peyton McKnight - Page 2 (~-1264)
provided, however, that one-fourth (l/4) of such net revenue from the motor fuel tax shall be allocated to the Available School Fund.

... (Emphasis added). If the proposed refinery tax isan ad valorem tax or atax ongross production, the revenue need not be allocated pursuant to article 8, section 7a. However, it appears that the proposed tax might be an occupation tax in which case one quarter of the tax revenue is allocated to education under article 7, section 3 of the constitution. Attorney General Opinion V-1027 (1950). As we have not been provided with the precise language of the contemplated statute, we cannot give a conclusive answer asto the character ofthe tax. Your second question is: If the answer to question (1)is in the negative, would the use of current contracts and other sales products make a difference such that the answer to question (1)wouldbecome affirmative? Wedonot believe that the use of “current contracts and other sales data” as evidence of the market value of refinery production would bring the tax within chapters 9 and 10, title 122A. We believe such information is relevant to a determination of market value. Cf. Tax.-Gen. art. 3.02; Attorney General Opinion M-968(1971).Arefinery’s produc=ould be assessable with or without information regarding sales and contracts. The tax would not be contingent on there being a sale, transfer or other distribution. Youalso ask: Would an ad valorem tax on the crude oil inputs into the refinery be a motor fuels tax such that the revenues therefrom would be subject to the requirements of Title 122A,Articles 9and lo? We do not believe that revenue from a tax on the crude oil received by a refinery for processing is subject to chapters 9 and 10,title 122A. Crude oil does not meet the definition of motor or special fuel and therefore is not taxed under chapters 9and 10. Tax.-Gen. arts. 9.01(l),10.02(l),(2). SUMMARY An ad valorem tax on refinery production or crude oil isnot subject to chapters 9and 10,title 122A,Taxation-General.

P- 5008. .

Honorable Peyton McKnight - Page 3 (H-1264)

yd$u&l /A

. ,flc-.--- ,/.,,“I’ / JOHN L.HILL :’ ..I Attorney General of Texas

ENDALL, First Assistant

C. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman Opinion Committee jsn

p. 5009