alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel. SBIR Topic 203: Development of a Database & Software for Tobacco-Related Disease.                    

*Date:*                         March 10, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Joyce C. Pegues, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Special Review and Logistics Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Blvd. 7149, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/594-1286,                         *peguesj@mail.nih.gov.*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 2, 2005.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-2358 Filed 2-7-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# \~ Tira Misu, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

# FILED MAY 262009 Clerk 

### Us Bank

. . District and rUPtcy

### Courts

v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 

# 09 0970 Suthpin Courthouse, Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on plaintiffspro se complaint and application to proceed informapauperis. The Court will grant plaintiffs application and dismiss the complaint for lack ofsubject matterjurisdiction. The subject matterjurisdiction ofthe federal district courts is limited and is set forth generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federaljurisdiction is available only when a "federal question" is presented or the parties are ofdiverse citizenship and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking reliefin the district court must at least plead facts that bring the suit within the court'sjurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to plead such facts warrants dismissal ofthe action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). Plaintiff, a resident ofCollege Point, NewYork, sues a defendant based in New York for negligence and defamation. She demands $10 million in monetary damages. The complaint neither presents a federal question nor provides a basis for diversityjurisdictionbecause the parties are not ofdiverse citizenship. Accordingly, the complaint will be dismissed. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. I I Date: May

# +, 2009 

### !unitedStat District Judge
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-10 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-10 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 2 of 7
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-10 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 3 of 7
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-10 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 4 of 7
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-10 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 5 of 7
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-10 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 6 of 7
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-10 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 7 of 7
#### VAUGHN v. DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES

No. 24 PC.

No. 116 (Fall Term).

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 86.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 4 October 1978.
#### MATHIAS v. BRUMSEY

No. 128 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 558.

Petition by Plaintiff Taylor for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 January 1976.
Exhibit 32

             Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
   As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Louisville Gas and Electric
Company and Kentucky Utilities Company (the "Companies") on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officer's knowledge,

1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Companies as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.


November 9, 2005

                         /s/  Victor A. Staffieri
                     Chairman of the Board, President
                        and Chief Executive Officer
                    Louisville Gas and Electric Company
                        Kentucky Utilities Company




                          /s/  S. Bradford Rives
                          Chief Financial Officer
                    Louisville Gas and Electric Company
                        Kentucky Utilities Company


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-8 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 1 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-8 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 2 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-8 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 3 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-8 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 4 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-8 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 5 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-8 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 6 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-8 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 7 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-8 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 8 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-8 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 9 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-8 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 10 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-8 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 11 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-8 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 12 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-8 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 13 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-8 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 14 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-8 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 15 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-15000-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### BROOKS, COMR. OF LABOR v. ENTERPRISES, INC.

No. 42 PC.

No. 37 (Fall Term).

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 529.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 1 May 1979. Defendants’ notice of appeal allowed 1 May 1979.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-29-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,708<FN>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,080
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,968
<PP&E>                                           2,438
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,205
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,475
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           172
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,205
<SALES>                                         19,131
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,131
<CGS>                                           17,131
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,952
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (169)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (40)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (129)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (129)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
<FN>
<F1>Receivables net of allowances
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32.1







**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Annual Report of Workstream Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-K/A for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Deepak Gupta, the
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that, to the best of my knowledge:




|1. | the
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------






/s/ Deepak GuptaDeepak GuptaChief Executive OfficerDate: August 24, 2007








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Annual Report of Workstream Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-K/A for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen Lerch, the
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.






/s/ Stephen LerchStephen LerchChief Financial OfficerDate: August 24, 2007
The Depository Trust Company 

A subsidiary of the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation



BLANKET ISSUER LETTER OF REPRESENTATIONS 


ETFS GOLD TRUST


June 25, 2009

(Date)


Attention: Underwriting Department

The Depository Trust Company 

55 Water Street, 1SL 

New York, NY 10041-0099 



Ladies and Gentlemen: 


          This letter sets forth our understanding with respect to all issues (the “Securities”) that Issuer shall request to be made eligible for deposit by the Depository Trust Company (“DTC”). 


Issuer is formed under the laws of the State of New York. 


          To induce DTC to accept the Securities as eligible for deposit at DTC, and to act in accordance with DTC’s Rules with respect to the Securities, Issuer represents to DTC that issuer will comply with the requirements stated
in DTC’s Operational Arrangements, as they may be amended from time to time. 

	
Note:    	    	
      Very truly yours,    
	
Schedule A contains statements that DTC believes    	    	 	   
	
accurate describe DTC, the method of effecting      	    	
      ETFS GOLD TRUST,    
	
book-entry transfers of securities distributed      	    	 	   
	
through DTC, and certain related matters.   	    	
      by ETF Securities USA LLC, as sponsor        
	     
	
Received and Accepted      	    	By:	/s/
            Greg Burgess
	
THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY        	    	 	
(Authorized Officer’s Signature”) 
	     
	
By:        	/s/ The Depository Trust Company	    	 	Greg
        Burgess 
	       	 	 	 	(Print Name)
	 	 	 	 	 
	         	    	 	Ordnance
            House, 31 Pier Road, St. Helier JE48 PW
	       	 	 	 	(Street Address)
	 	 	 	 	 
	         	    	 	Jersey,
            Channel Islands
	                                   	 	 	(City, State, Country, Zip)
	 	 	 
	    	 	011-44-77-997-8005
	 	 	(Phone Number)
	 	 	 
	    	 	Greg.Burgess@etfsecurities.com
	    	 	
(Email Address)
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-20 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-20 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-20 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03224-KMK-GAY Document 17 Filed 04/02/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 7:07-cv-03224-KMK-GAY Document 17 Filed 04/02/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC     Document 67      Filed 10/15/2007     Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. OWENS

No. 58 PC.

Case below: 9 N.C. App. 727.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 January 1971.
#### GOODMAN v. GOODMAN

No. 317P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 371.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 July 1982.
#### MEWBORN v. HADDOCK

No. 25 PC.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 285.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 30 August 1974.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kellwood Company (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended October 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the
undersigned hereby individually certify that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of our knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

         and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
         of the Company as of and for the period covered in the Report.



/s/ Robert C. Skinner, Jr.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Robert C. Skinner, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer


January 13, 2006



/s/ W. Lee Capps III
---------------------------------------------------------------------
W. Lee Capps III, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer


January 13, 2006



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kellwood
Company and will be retained by Kellwood Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be
considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
J

- S59034

- 16

NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENN SYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. MELVIN METZ Appellant No. 3463 EDA 2015

Appeal from the PCRA Order October 13, 2015 in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Criminal Division

at No(s): CP

- 51

- CR

- 0903491

- 1996 BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., OLSO N, J. , and FITZGERALD, * J. JUDGMENT ORDER BY FITZGERALD, J.: FILED AUGUST 31, 2016
Pro se Appellant, Melvin Metz, appeals from the order dismissing his fourth Post Conviction Relief Act 1 (“PCRA”) petition. Appellant claims that Alleyne v. United States , 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013), applies retroactively to his 1998 sentence. We affirm. We adopt the facts and procedural history set forth by the PCRA court. See PCRA Ct. Op., 12/11/15, at 1

- 2. Appellant timely appealed and the court did not order him to comply with Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b). Appellant contends the court erred by not correcting his illegal sentence. As noted above, he asserts Alleyne applies retroactively to his case.

* Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.

1 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541

- 9546.J

- S59034

- 16

- 2

-

Before addressing the merits of Appellant’s claim, our Supreme Court has required this Court to examine whether we have jurisdiction to entertain the underlying P CRA petition. See Commonwealth v. Fahy , 737 A.2d 214, 223 (Pa. 1999). “Our standard of review of a PCRA court’s dismissal of a PCRA petition is limited to examining whether the PCRA court’s determination is supported by the evidence of record and free of legal error.” Commonwealth v. Wilson , 824 A.2d 331, 333 (Pa. Super. 2003) ( en banc ) (citation omitted). A PCRA petition “must normally be filed within one year of the date the judgment becomes final . . . unless one of the exceptions in § 9545(b)(1)(i)

- (iii) applies and the petition is filed within 60 days of the date the claim could have been presented.” Commonwealth v. Copenhefer , 941 A.2d 646, 648 (Pa. 2007) (citations and footnote omitted). After careful review of the parties’ briefs, the certified record, and the PCRA court’s decision, we affirm on the basis of that decision. See PCRA Ct. Op. at 3

- 4 (holding that Alleyne has no retroactive effect to cases in which judgments of sentence had become final (citing Commonwealth v. Miller , 102 A.3d 998, 995 (Pa. Super. 2014)). More recently and definitively, our Supreme Court held “ Alleyne does not apply retroactively to cases pending on collateral review . . . .” Commonwealth v. Washington , ___ A.3d ___, 2016 WL 3909088 at *8 (Pa. July 19, 2016). Havi ng discerned no abuse of discretion or law, we affirm the order below. See Wilson , 824 A.2d at 333.J

- S59034

- 16

- 3

-

Order affirmed. Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary
Date: 8/31/2016
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 85 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 85 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 85 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 85 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 4 of 4
#### GRIMES v. GUARANTY CO.

No. 31 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 457.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 1978.
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 14

- 00006

- CV

INLINE OPERATING LIMITED D/B/A

INLINE DIGITAL IMAGE, Appellant

V.

HEALTHMARKETS LEAD MARKETING GROUP, INC.

AND HEALTHMARKETS, L.L.C., Appellee s

On Appeal from the 67th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 067

- 259145

- 12

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Inline Operating Limited , d/b/a/ Inline Digital Image, has filed a n unopposed motion

asking this C ourt to dismiss its appeal with prejudice, with each party to pay its own costs. 1

Pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure , the motion is granted.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.1(a)(1).

We dismiss t he appeal.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: July 1 , 2014

Date Decided: July 2 , 2014

1 Originally appealed to the Second Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme

Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 73.001 (West 2013). We are

unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Second Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant

issue. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 41.3.
#### BOWEN v. JONES

No. 80 PC.

Case below: 21 N.C. App. 224.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 June 1974.
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-26 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-26 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-26 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cr-00326-RWS Document 15-2 Filed 02/11/2008 Page 1 of 1
Order filed January 28, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00958

- CR

____________ JAIRO UMANZOR , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 228th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1349385



### ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's Exhibit 69, video
of the defendant.The clerk of the 228th District Court is directed to deliv er to the Clerk of this

court the original of State's Exhibit 69, video of the defendant, on or before February 06, 2015. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this c ourt for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of State's Exhibit 69, video of the defendant, to the clerk of the 228th District Court.

PER CURIAM
Case 1:07-cv-03398-BSJ Document 2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03398-BSJ Document 2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 2 of 2