alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2492

CLARENCE BRITT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PERRY WHITEHEAD MARTIN, SR.; JACK BENJAMIN

CRAWLEY, JR.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-97-1007-5-H)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 23, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Britt, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Ray Wooten, WARD &

SMITH, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina; Jack Benjamin Crawley, Jr.,

LAW OFFICES OF JACK B. CRAWLEY, JR., Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Britt appeals the district court’s orders dismissing

his civil diversity complaint as time-barred and denying his motion

for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Britt v. Martin,

No. CA-97-1007-5-H (E.D.N.C. June 30; Sept. 10, 1998). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31.1

         I, Scott Landow, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Parentech,
Inc.;
         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
         about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
         of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
         evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
          the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditor and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
          design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
          are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
          internal control over financial reporting.



Dated:  October 11, 2004

         /s/ Scott Landow
         ----------------
         Scott Landow, Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE v. CARRIKER

No. 182 PC.

Case below: 24 N.C. App. 91.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 4 February 1975.
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 13 Filed 02/19/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 13 Filed 02/19/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### IN RE BEATTY

No. 75 PC.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 563.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 24 September 1974. Motion of Employment Security Commission to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 24 September 1974.
Document

[NAME]








MARCH 15, 2017
PARENT-BASED 
AWARD LETTER




The Compensation and Management Succession Committee of the Company's Board of Directors has awarded you:




Parent-Based Award Valued at _______ 
Grant Date: March 15, 2017


This Parent-Based Award is subject to the terms and conditions contained in the 2017 Parent-Based Award Provisions (“Provisions”) set forth in Appendix A to this Award Letter. The Provisions contain terms and conditions regarding the vesting of this Parent-Based Award, termination of employment, tax withholding, non-solicitation of Company employees and customers, regulatory compliance and other matters, and I encourage you to read this document carefully.


Please retain these documents in your personal records.








_____________________________________
John D. Johns
Chairman of the Board and Chief 
Executive Officer of Protective Life 
Corporation
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-4 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-4 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-4 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 5-4 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-15131-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Enstar Group, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.

/s/ Nimrod T. Frazer
-----------------------------------------
Nimrod T. Frazer
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
August 9, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Enstar Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Enstar Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

                                       32
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 25-2 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 6-4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 6-4 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. BAUGUESS

No. 147 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 185.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 June 1976.
<TABLE>
                                                                                                 EXHIBIT 12

                     KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY
        Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                (in thousands except ratio data)
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                    Twelve
                                                                                                    Months
                                                              Year Ended December 31,               Ended
                                                  1994       1995       1996       1997      1998   3/31/99 
<S>                                             <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Fixed Charges:                                                                                    
  Interest on First Mortgage Bonds . . . . . .  $19,090    $19,090    $14,914   $14,867   $13,936   $13,893
  Interest on Other Long-term Debt . . . . . .     -         2,422      6,446     8,597    12,188    12,672
  Interest on Short-term Debt. . . . . . . . .    1,621      2,242      2,849     3,034     2,455     2,078
  Miscellaneous Interest Charges . . . . . . .      485        510        555       559       634       644
  Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals.      700        700        800     1,700     1,500     1,500
       Total Fixed Charges . . . . . . . . . .  $21,896    $24,964    $25,564   $28,757   $30,713   $30,787
                                                                                                  
Earnings:                                                                                         
  Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  $25,273    $25,128    $16,973   $20,746   $21,676   $24,868
  Plus Federal Income Taxes. . . . . . . . . .    2,178      3,914      5,119     9,415     9,785    11,963
  Plus State Income Taxes. . . . . . . . . . .    1,154      1,420        598     2,190     2,096     2,102
  Plus Fixed Charges (as above). . . . . . . .   21,896     24,964     25,564    28,757    30,713    30,787
       Total Earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . .  $50,501    $55,426    $48,254   $61,108   $64,270   $69,720

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges . . . . . .     2.30       2.22       1.88      2.12      2.09      2.26
</TABLE>
#### Anthony Parisi, Respondent, v Roy Hines, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

November 13,1986

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Friedman, Leeds, Shorenstein & Armenakis (Richard L. Forren*of counsel), for appellant. *Pruzan, Pruzan & Pruzan (Peter J. Pruzan*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order entered March 13, 1986 affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the decision of Tom, Housing Judge, at the Civil Court.

Sandifer, J. P., Parness and Ostrau, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001095855
<NAME> WORLDWIDE FLIGHT SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,525
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,572
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,428
<INVENTORY>                                        341
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,387
<PP&E>                                          45,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,185
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 246,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,938
<BONDS>                                         58,062
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          139,957
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   246,141
<SALES>                                        216,870
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               216,870
<CGS>                                          189,080
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  189,080
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,163
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,950
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,660)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (660)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,197)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,197)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### McCARLEY v. McCARLEY

No. 16 PC.

Case below: 24 N.C. App. 373.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 4 March 1975.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Francis Linton, Appellant.

(Argued June 13, 1918;

decided October 15, 1918.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Court of General Sessions of the Peace in the county of New York, rendered June 8, 1917, upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of murder in the first degree, and from an order entered April 5, 1918, denying a motion for a new trial.

*David C. Hirsch*and *Clark L. Jordan*for appellant.

*Edward*Swann, *District Attorney (Robert C. Taylor*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Collin, Cardozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting on ground that the verdict is against the weight of evidence: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan and Crane, JJ.
#### PELAEZ v. PELAEZ

No. 109 PC.

Case below: 16 N.C. App. 604.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 18 January 1973.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Skye International, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Perry Logan, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ Perry D. Logan 
 Perry D.
Logan
 Chief
Executive Officer
 
 
 
 Date:
March 26, 2009
Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC Document 10-5 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
Form of Certificate of Trust of SunTrust Capital XVI and XVII



 Exhibit 4.1.3 
 CERTIFICATE OF TRUST 
 OF 
 SUNTRUST CAPITAL              
 THIS Certificate of Trust of SunTrust Capital              (the “Trust”) is being duly executed and filed on behalf of the Trust by the
undersigned, as trustees, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del.C. § 3801 et seq.) (the “Act”). 
 1. Name. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is SunTrust Capital             . 
 2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware are U.S. Bank Trust National Association,
300 Delaware Avenue, 9th Floor, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, Attention: Corporate Trust Services Division. 
 3. Effective Date. This
Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing with the Secretary of State. 
 4. Counterparts. This Certificate of Trust may be
executed in one or more counterparts. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with
Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act. 
  

	
	
	  
	Raymond D. Fortin
	Administrative Trustee
	
	  
	Jerome T. Lienhard, II
	Administrative Trustee
	
	  
	Michael Spingler
	Administrative Trustee










			
	 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
 as Property
Trustee

		
	By:	 	 
	Name:	 	Earl W. Dennison Jr.
	Title:	 	Vice President


  

			
	 U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
 as
Delaware Trustee

		
	By:	 	 
	Name:	 	Earl W. Dennison Jr.
	Title:	 	Vice President
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 2 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 3 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 4 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 5 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 6 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 7 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 8 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 9 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 10 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 11 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 12 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 13 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 14 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 15 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 16 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 17 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 18 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 19 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 20 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 21 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 22 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 23 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 24 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 25 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 26 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 27 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 28 of 28
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00235-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF H.E.M., A 

CHILD

NO. 02-13-00236-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF D.L.M., A 

CHILD

------------

FROM THE 90TH DISTRICT COURT OF YOUNG COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered appellant’s unopposed “Motion To Dismiss Appeal”

filed for each of the above referenced appeals. It is the court’s opinion that the 

motions should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeals. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ. 

DELIVERED: July 25, 2013

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case 1:07-cv-03366-GEL Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03366-GEL Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03366-GEL Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03366-GEL Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 4 of 11
EXHIBIT A 

Case 1:07-cv-03366-GEL Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03366-GEL Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03366-GEL Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03366-GEL Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03366-GEL Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03366-GEL Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03366-GEL Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 11 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 35 Filed 08/12/2008 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 35 Filed 08/12/2008 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 35 Filed 08/12/2008 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 35 Filed 08/12/2008 Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the quarterly report of Berry Plastics Corporation (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 28, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
James M. Kratochvil, the Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.











/s/ James M.
Kratochvil


James M.
Kratochvil


Executive
Vice-President, Chief Financial


Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary





Date:                      August
7, 2008
Case 1:07-cv-03522-PKC     Document 2      Filed 05/02/2007     Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. MOORE

No. 6P82.

Case below: 55 N.C. App. 268.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 27 January 1982.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 41236 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. JOSE ALEXANDER QUINTEROS

- SORTO, also known as Jose Alexander Quintero

- Sorto, also known as Jose Alexander Quinteros , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:17

- CR

- 454

- 1

Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Alexander Quinteros

- Sorto has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Quinteros

- Sorto h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 12, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-41236 Document: 00514719354 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/12/2018No. 17

- 41236

2 record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-41236 Document: 00514719354 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/12/2018
#### STATE v. DUNN

No. 55 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 742.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 November 1978.
#### STATE v. HUNT

No. 421 PC

Case below: 48 N.C. App. 431

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 November 1980.