Skip directly to site content Skip directly to search


Español  Other Languages


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
 Search
		×
			NIOSH
			NIOSH
				All CDC
				Submit
			For a full list of topics:A-Z Index
			Advanced Search
		Advanced Search


The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)








Study Syllabus for Classification of Radiographs of Pneumoconioses						Print
																Related Pages
										Radiograph ClassificationSubset 1Section 1: Image Quality
Assessment of image technical quality is critically important prior to performing an ILO classification. Quality appraisals are therefore appropriately the first items recorded on the classification form. Historically, variations in image quality have been shown to have an important effect on the small opacity profusion category selected by the reader. The quality of modern digital chest radiographs is often better than film images, especially with appropriate use of window and level functions. However, regardless of the imaging modality, readers completing ILO classifications should assess the quality of the image in each lung zone. Depending on the type of opacities being evaluated, the appearance and perception may be altered, accentuated, or diminished. Quality effects may be generalized throughout the image, or limited to specific lung zones.
Factors that can influence perception of opacities may be related to the image contrast, resolution, exposure, or gray scale, as well degree of inflation, body position, or movement during the examination. Localized effects may be due to superimposed bony structures, soft tissues, or foreign bodies (e.g., pacemakers, tubing, clothing, etc.). Digital radiographic systems should be monitored to avoid linear artifacts, or noise/mottle, which can suggest small pneumoconiotic opacities, and post processing software functions should be set to the minimum edge enhancement permitted by the system, to facilitate comparisons to ILO digital standard radiographs.
After selecting the one or two standard images that visually appear to most closely match the subject radiograph, the reader should weigh the potential impact of any quality factors on the appearance of parenchymal opacities. When deemed necessary, an adjustment of the profusion category may be appropriate, based upon the anticipated influence of quality factors on the comparison of the subject radiograph and the ILO standard. If more than a minor adjustment is judged necessary, consideration should be given, whenever possible, to obtaining a better quality radiograph, and classifying the imperfect image as unreadable.
There are four grades of radiographic quality:
good–free of technical imperfections or artifacts;
acceptable with no technical defects or artifacts likely to impair classification of the radiograph for pneumoconiosis;
acceptable, with technical defects or artifacts but still adequate for classification purposes;
“U/R”, unreadable or unacceptable for classification purposes.Minor errors in positioning and handling artifacts that do not overlie the heart or lungs would usually be classified “2.” Minor degrees of over- or underexposure and minor departures from proper radiographic contrast that do not preclude the classification of the radiograph should be classified as “3.” Images with gross over- or underexposure, gross unsharpness, and gross departures from proper radiographic contrast should all be classified “U/R” (see appended reprint from the Federal Register for radiographic quality standards). If the technical quality is not grade 1, an indication of the technical defect(s) must be made.
Check the box (“1,” “2,” “3,” or “U/R”) that best indicates the quality of the radiograph. You may wish to wait until you have attempted to classify the radiograph before deciding whether its “quality” is such that it may affect your interpretation. If boxes “2,” “3,” or “U/R” are checked, indicate the reason(s) by marking all boxes that apply, and specify “other defects” on the adjacent lines.
1. Image Quality form sampleRADIOGRAPH IDENTIFICATIONPage 1 of 1PARENCHYMAL ABNORMALITIES
							
					
							Last Reviewed:  April 26, 2023						Source: 	National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
					Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate homeStudy Syllabus for Classification of Radiographs of Pneumoconioses
Introductionplus icon
Preface
Appreciation to Contributors
Intent of the Self-study Syllbus
Getting Started
Clinical Overviewplus icon
Major Occupational Lung Diseasesplus icon
Pneumoconioses
Central Role of Diagnostic Imagingplus icon
Role of CT
Overview of Nonimaging Clinical Tools in Lung Disease Diagnosis
Appendix A
References
Pathology Overviewplus icon
Pulmonary Silicosis
Coal Workers’ Pneumoconiosis
Asbestos Pleuropulmonary Disease
Pathological-Clinical Correlations
References
Radiograph Classificationplus icon
SUBSET 1 – Radiograph Classification, #1 to #19plus icon
Introduction
Radiograph Identification
Section 1: Image Quality
Section 2: Parenchymal Abnormalities, #1 to #14
Section 3: Pleural Abnormalities, #15 to #19
Section 4: Any Other Abnormalities
Section 5
SUBSET 2 – Radiograph #20 to #27plus icon
Radiograph #20
Radiograph #21
Radiograph #22
Radiograph #23
Radiograph #24
Radiographs #25 to #27
SUBSET 3 – Radiograph #28 to #38plus icon
Radiographs #28 to #30
Radiographs #31 to #32
Radiographs #33 to #35
Radiographs #36 to #38
SUBSET 4 – Radiograph #39 to #46 (Small and Large Opacities)plus icon
Radiographs #39 to #40
Radiographs #41 to #42
Radiographs #43 to #44
Radiograph #45
Radiograph #46
SUBSET 5 – Classifications and Answer Keys, Radiographs #47 to #83
Quiz Follow NIOSH Facebook
Pinterest
Twitter
YouTube
 NIOSH Homepage NIOSH A-Z
Workplace Safety & Health Topics
Publications and Products
Programs
Contact NIOSH


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue