alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**FORM 10-Q**

 

**Quarter endedSeptember 30, 2010**

 

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Dan W. Snyder, certify that:

 

1.     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kenilworth SystemsCorporation;

 

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

 

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)    Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)    Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: November 15,2010

 
|   | /s/ Dan W. Snyder                                 |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, |
|   | President, Treasurer and Director                 |

 

1

----
<TABLE>
                                                                                                 EXHIBIT 12

                     KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY
        Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                (in thousands except ratio data)
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                    Twelve
                                                                                                    Months
                                                              Year Ended December 31,               Ended
                                                  1993       1994       1995       1996      1997   9/30/98 
<S>                                             <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Fixed Charges:                                                                                    
  Interest on First Mortgage Bonds . . . . . .  $17,472    $19,090    $19,090   $14,914   $14,867   $13,979
  Interest on Other Long-term Debt . . . . . .    2,033       -         2,422     6,446     8,597    11,914
  Interest on Short-term Debt. . . . . . . . .    1,001      1,621      2,242     2,849     3,034     2,401
  Miscellaneous Interest Charges . . . . . . .      523        485        510       555       559       625
  Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals.      800        700        700       800     1,700     1,700
       Total Fixed Charges . . . . . . . . . .  $21,829    $21,896    $24,964   $25,564   $28,757   $30,619
                                                                                                  
Earnings:                                                                                         
  Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  $18,031    $25,273    $25,128   $16,973   $20,746   $19,895
  Plus Federal Income Taxes. . . . . . . . . .    1,620      2,178      3,914     5,119     9,415     8,871 
  Plus State Income Taxes. . . . . . . . . . .    1,116      1,154      1,420       598     2,190     2,051
  Plus Fixed Charges (as above). . . . . . . .   21,829     21,896     24,964    25,564    28,757    30,619
       Total Earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . .  $42,596    $50,501    $55,426   $48,254   $61,108   $61,436

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges . . . . . .     1.95       2.30       2.22      1.88      2.12      2.00
</TABLE>
#### WYATT v. HAYWOOD

No. 32 PC.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 267.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 30 August 1974.
# EXHIBIT 32.2

| | I,
Leslie J. Cummings, Vice President of Finance and Treasurer of Knape & Vogt
Manufacturing Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended October 1, 2005
                    which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three
                    months ended October 1, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
                    financial condition and results of operations of Knape & Vogt Manufacturing
                    Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:
October 31, 2005

| |  | /s/ Leslie J. Cummings
Leslie J. CummingsVice President of Finance andTreasurer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 172 

To delay the reimposition of the annual fee on health insurance providers 

until after 2021. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 16, 2019 

Mr. GARDNER (for himself, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. JONES, Mr. 

SCOTT of South Carolina, and Ms. SINEMA) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To delay the reimposition of the annual fee on health 

insurance providers until after 2021. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Insurance Tax 

5 Relief Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DELAY OF REIMPOSITION OF ANNUAL FEE ON 

7 HEALTH INSURANCE PROVIDERS UNTIL 

8 AFTER 2020. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 9010(j)(3) of the Patient 

10 Protection and Affordable Care Act is amended by strikVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:00 Jan 25, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S172.IS S172

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 172 IS

1 ing ‘‘December 31, 2019’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

2 2021’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 this section shall apply to calendar years beginning after 

5 December 31, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the December
31, 1997 10-K of Ocean Bio-Chem, Inc. and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         787,411
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,193,233
<ALLOWANCES>                                    35,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,237,207
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,472,639
<PP&E>                                       4,738,735
<DEPRECIATION>                                 597,704
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,276,542
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,496,122
<BONDS>                                      4,370,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,530
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,372,890
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,276,542
<SALES>                                     12,849,507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,086,026
<CGS>                                        8,331,510
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,768,216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             427,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (264,094)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (95,588)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (168,506)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (168,506)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)




</TABLE>
#### COMR. OF INSURANCE v. RATE BUREAU

No. 85

Reported: 300 NC 381

Petition by plaintiff to rehear denied 16 September 1980.
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATIONS

I, Charles E. Drimal, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of PrimeEnergy Corporation, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PrimeEnergy Corporation.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

          a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit  committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);

          a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of  internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

August 13, 2004  
/s/ Charles E. Drimal Jr.   
-------------------------------------
  
Charles E. Drimal Jr   
Chief Executive Officer   
PrimeEnergy Corporation
Case 1:06-cv-14982-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### WILLIFORD v. WILLIFORD

No. 173 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 61.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 25 August 1975'.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Enstar Group, Inc.
(the "Corporation") for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,
certifies that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



/s/ Nimrod T. Frazer
---------------------------------------
Nimrod T. Frazer
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003






























A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Enstar Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Enstar Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<PAGE>
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Enstar Group, Inc.
(the "Corporation") for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



/s/ Cheryl D. Davis
----------------------------------------------------
Cheryl D. Davis
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Corporate
Taxes, and Secretary
May 15, 2003






























A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Enstar Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Enstar Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated November 8, 2006 relating to the consolidated statement of operations and cash flows for the year ended August 31, 2006 of Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (which report on the financial statements expenses an unqualified opinion and includes separate report titled Comments by Independent Registered Chartered Accountants of Canada  United States of America reporting differences referring to Platinum Group Metals Ltd.s ability to continue as a going concern and appearing in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Platinum Group Metals Ltd. for the year ended August 31, 2006).



[ex999001.jpg]



|                                                                                  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Independent Registered Chartered Accountants
Vancouver, Canada
September 11, 2009 | 
|                                                                                  |
#### Venancio RAMOS-MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-72469.

Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 4, 2005.**

Decided April 11, 2005.

David-Blake, Oceanside, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Executive Office of Immigration Review, Office of Immigration Judge, San Diego, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, John L. Davis, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immi-' *865gration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before KOZINSKI, HAWKINS, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto R. Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM***

Venancio Ramos-Mendoza, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. We have partial jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review in part and deny it in part.

The BIA concluded that Ramos-Mendoza was ineligible for cancellation of removal because he “failed 'to demonstrate that his removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his children.” We lack jurisdiction to review this determination, *see Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003), and therefore need not reach Ramos-Mendoza’s claim concerning continuous physical presence.

Ramos-Mendoza contends that the BIA’s allegedly erroneous determination that he did not establish continuous physical presence deprived him of the opportunity to file a meaningful motion to reopen. To the extent that this argument alleges a due process violation, it fails because Ramos-Mendoza has not demonstrated prejudice from the alleged violation. *See Ramirez-Perez v. Ashcroft,*336 F.3d 1001, 1006-07 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1816 

To prohibit the manufacture for sale, offer for sale, distribution in commerce, 

or importation into the United States of any crib bumper, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 12, 2019 

Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. 

BROWN, Mr. DURBIN, and Mr. CARDIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To prohibit the manufacture for sale, offer for sale, distribution in commerce, or importation into the United States 

of any crib bumper, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Cribs Act of 

5 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SALE OF CRIB BUMPERS. 

7 (a) PROHIBITION ON THE SALE OF CRIB BUMP8 ERS.—Beginning on the date that is 180 days after the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1816 IS

1 date of enactment of this Act, it shall be unlawful for any 

2 person to manufacture for sale, offer for sale, distribute 

3 in commerce, or import into the United States any crib 

4 bumper. 

5 (b) TREATMENT OF VIOLATION.—A violation of sub6 section (a) shall be treated as a violation of section 

7 19(a)(1) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 

8 2068(a)(1)). 

9 (c) CRIB BUMPER DEFINED.—In this section, the 

10 term ‘‘crib bumper’’— 

11 (1) means any material that is intended to 

12 cover the sides of a crib to prevent injury to any crib 

13 occupant from impacts against the side of a crib or 

14 to prevent partial or complete access to any openings 

15 in the sides of a crib to prevent a crib occupant from 

16 getting any part of the body entrapped in any open17 ing; and 

18 (2) includes a padded crib bumper, a supported 

19 and unsupported vinyl bumper guard, a mesh crib 

20 liner, and vertical crib slat covers. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 21.1

interWAVE COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, LTD.    LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

|Subsidiary                                       |  | Incorporated   
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------
|interWAVE Communications, Inc.                   |  | Delaware, USA  
|interWAVE Communications Australia Pty. Ltd.     |  | Australia      
|interWAVE Communications B.V.                    |  | Netherlands    
|interWAVE Communications India Private Limited   |  | India          
|interWAVE Communications Ireland, Ltd.           |  | Ireland        
|interWAVE Communications Lanka (Private) Limited |  | Sri Lanka      
|interWAVE Communications Networks, S.A.          |  | Uruguay        
|interWAVE Communications International S.A.      |  | France         
|interWAVE Communications (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.    |  | P.R. China     
|interWAVE Communications UK, Ltd.                |  | United Kingdom 
|Microcellular Systems Limited                    |  | Ireland        
|Microcellular Systems USA                        |  | California, USA
|Wireless, Inc.                                   |  | Delaware, USA  
|interWAVE Advanced Communications, Inc.          |  | Delaware, USA  
|International Wave Communications Networks, Inc. |  | Philippines    

---

QuickLinks
Case 1:06-cv-14999-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### MANUFACTURING CO. v. MANUFACTURING CO.

No. 62 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 726.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 November 1978. Motion of plaintiff to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 3 November 1978.