alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.15 

    

    

     

    Dr. Moshe Eliash

    Barrister-at-law, Advocate and Notary

    2 Hasoreg St., POB 433

    Telephone 651681, 6054281

    Faximilia 6254282

    Jerusalem 91003

    Eliash7@bezeqint.net

    

    

    Tuesday, 12 November 2019

    

    

    To: Sol-Gel

    Golda Meir 7

    Ness Ziona

    Re: Extension of the lease periods

    

    

    The owners of the property agree to extend the lease period in accordance with the lease agreement of 10/10/2007, as last amended in documents dated 30/3/16 and 22/09/16, and also the lease period in accordance with the
      lease agreement dated 30/01/17, as was last amended in documents dated 03/07/2018, so that the aforementioned lease periods end on December 31, 2023.

     

    The extended lease periods are subject to all provisions of the aforementioned agreements, mutatis  mutandis  including provisions regarding the lease fee and management fee.

     

    The owners guarantee that if any lessee evacuates parking spaces, the owners will inform you of such and you will be entitled to lease all or some of those parking space, upon a 14 day notice period, on the same terms as
      are customary at that time.

     

    If you agree to extend the lease periods as stated above, please confirm your approval on a copy of this letter and return to me.

     

    Respectfully,

     

    /s/ Moshe Eliash

    Dr. Moshe Eliash, Adv.

     

    We agree and confirm

     

    /s/ Gilad Mamlok

    Gilad Mamlok, CFO

    Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd.
EXHIBIT 13



Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of EPCOS AG, a Germany company (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended September 30, 2003 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 29, 2004



/s/    Gerhard PegamGerhard Pegam Chief Executive
Officer




---

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of EPCOS AG, a Germany company (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended September 30, 2003 (the Report) of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: March 29, 2004



/s/    Wilfried BackesDr. Wilfried Backes Chief Financial
Officer
#### STATE v. PARKS

No. 5 PC.

Case below: 24 N.C. App. 314.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 February 1975.
#### STATE v. CHISHOLM

No. 22 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 334.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 March 1977.
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM Document 5-10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM Document 5-10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM Document 5-10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM Document 5-10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM Document 5-10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM Document 5-10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM Document 5-10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM Document 5-10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM Document 5-10 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 9 of 9
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-30485

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GERALD SMITH,

 DefendantAppellant.

-------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CR-30015-3

--------------------------------------------------------

February 9, 2001

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Gerald Smith has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Smith has received a copy of counsel’s

motion and brief, and he has filed a pro se brief of his own. Our review of the briefs filed by counsel

and Smith and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous point for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
#### MORTGAGE CO. v. REAL ESTATE, INC.

No. 193 P.C.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 1.

Petition by defendant construction company for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 5 February 1979.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DOROTEO ANTONIO-HERNANDEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-70402

Agency No. A076-611-065

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Doroteo Antonio-Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

FILED

MAR 09 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-70402

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS,

321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for review.

To the extent we have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of AntonioHernandez’s motion to reopen, see Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 601 (9th

Cir. 2006), we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in determining

that the evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening, see Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d

1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002) (BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed if

it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law”).

To the extent Antonio-Hernandez contends that the BIA failed to consider

all of the evidence he submitted with the motion to reopen, he has not overcome

the presumption that the BIA did review the record. See Fernandez, 439 F.3d at

603. 

Finally, Antonio-Hernandez’s contentions that the BIA failed to accept his

mother’s statement as true and violated 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1) are not supported

by the record.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MINGYU WANG,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 72367

Agency No. A205

- 192

- 796

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 17, 2022 * *

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Mingyu Wang

, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeal s’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 15

- 72367

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the

agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility

determinations under the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder , 590 F.3d 1034,

1039

- 40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on inconsistencies between Wang ’s testimony , his declaration, his letters of

support, and his household register. See id. at 104 7

- 4 8 ( adverse credibility finding

reasonable under the totality of the circumstances ). Wang ’s explanation s do not

compel a contrary conclusion. See Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir.

2000). Thus, i n the absence of credible testimony, in this case, Wang ’s asylum and

withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156

(9th Cir. 2003). In light of this disposition, we need not reach his remaining

contentions regarding the merits of his claims. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d

532, 53 8 (9th Cir. 2004) (courts and agencies are not required to decide issues

unnecessary to the results they reach).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because

Wang ’s claim was based on the same testimony the agency found not credible, and

W ang does not point to any other evidence in the record that compels the

conclusion that it is more likely than not he would be tortured in China

. See

Farah , 348 F.3d at 1157.3 15

- 72367

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Doc 

United States District Court

Southern District of New York

Office of the Clerk

U.S. Courthouse

500 Pearl Street, New York, N.Y. 10007-1213

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -X

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT

07cv3464

Carpenter v. Merck & Co., Inc.

 

 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X 

 

Pursuant to the memorandum of the Case Processing Assistant, the above-entitled action is 

reassigned to the calendar of

Judge Keenan

All future documents submitted in this action are to be presented in the Clerk=s

Office of the Southern District Court for filing and shall bear the assigned judge=s

initials after the case number.

The attorney(s) for the plaintiff(s) are requested to serve a copy of the Notice of

assignment on all defendants.

J. Michael McMahon, CLERK

Dated: 5/09/2007

By: Jenny R. Horne

 Deputy Clerk 

 

 

cc: Attorneys of Record 

PS REASSIGNMENT FORM 

 

Data Quality Control 

Revised: March 9, 2001

Case 1:07-cv-03464-JFK Document 2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (the Company) for the
period ended July 31, 2009, I, D. Michael Parker, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended July 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended July 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 11, 2009



/s/ D. Michael ParkerD. Michael Parker Senior Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 8 Filed 01/22/2008 Page 1 of 4Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 8 Filed 01/22/2008 Page 2 of 4Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 8 Filed 01/22/2008 Page 3 of 4Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 8 Filed 01/22/2008 Page 4 of 4
#### TUCKER v. TUCKER

No. 44 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 502.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 April 1979.
#### STATE v. TAYLOR

No. 85 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 709.

Application by defendant for further review denied 3 November 1978.
Exhibit 32.1

       CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Woodstock Financial
Group,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
December  31,  2007  as  filed with the Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), William  J.  Raike,
III,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  and  Melissa  L.
Whitley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do
each  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  that
to his and her knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully complies with  the  requirements  of
     Section  13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act  of
     1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
     in  all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and
     results of operations of the Company.



/s/ William J. Raike, III
-------------------------
William J. Raike, III
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 24, 2008



/s/ Melissa L. Whitley
----------------------
Melissa L. Whitley
Chief Financial Officer
March 24, 2008
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF     Document 10      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF     Document 10      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF     Document 10      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 3 of 3
#### HUFF v. TRENT ACADEMY

No. 327 PC.

Case below: 53 N.C. App. 113.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 October 1981.
Case 1:07-cv-03495-SHS Document 4 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03495-SHS Document 4 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5474 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5474

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act with respect to 
   reclassification of hospitals as rural referral centers under the 
                           Medicare Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 28, 2010

 Mr. Schauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act with respect to 
   reclassification of hospitals as rural referral centers under the 
                           Medicare Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hospital Reclassification Correction 
Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. RECLASSIFICATION OF HOSPITALS AS RURAL REFERRAL CENTERS UNDER 
              THE MEDICARE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1886(d)(10)(D)(iii) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(10)(D)(iii)) is amended by inserting ``or a 
hospital which is the only subsection (d) hospital in its Metropolitan 
Statistical Area'' after ``under paragraph (5)(C)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to the application of guidelines to applications 
filed before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act for 
reclassifications for periods beginning on or after October 1, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Keane, Inc. for the period endedJune 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, John J. Leahy, the Executive Vice President ofFinance, Chief Financial Officer and Interim President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Keane, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1.           the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.           the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, ourfinancial condition and results of operation.
| August 8, 2006 |   | /s/ JOHN J. LEAHY                                 |
|---------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                |   | John J. Leahy                                     |
|                |   | Executive Vice President of Finance and           |
|                |   | Administration, Chief Financial Officer           |
|                |   | and Interim President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
NIOSH • 1000 Frederick Lane, Morgantown, WV 26508 • 304-285-5916

Trooper Crashes on Roadway While 

Responding to Reckless Driver Complaint—

Kentucky

(NIOSH LEO 2016-02)

FACE IT: Report Slides
2

Summary

• A 23-year-old state police 

trooper was fatally injured 

when he lost control of his 

vehicle in a curve and was 

struck by an oncoming tractor 

trailer. 

• The trooper was responding to 

a complaint of a reckless 

driver whom Dispatch had 

advised was traveling ahead of 

him. 

• Using his cell phone, the 

trooper called Dispatch to get 

an update on the location of 

the reckless driver. 

Photo taken at scene of crash.

(Photo courtesy of Kentucky State Police.)
3

Summary • As the trooper entered a curve in the 

road, he lost control of his patrol car, 

which rotated counterclockwise, and 

crossed into the path of oncoming 

traffic. 

• Seeing the out-of-control patrol unit, 

the driver of an oncoming tractor 

trailer applied his brakes and steered 

toward the shoulder in attempt to 

avoid crashing into the trooper. 

• The patrol unit had spun 

approximately three-fourths of a full 

rotation, placing the driver’s side 

door in front of the oncoming tractor 

trailer as the collision occurred. 

• The trooper died on impact.

Photo. Patrol unit at scene, post-crash.

(Photo courtesy of Kentucky State Police.)
4

Counterclockwise rotation of patrol unit as trooper lost control and was struck by 

oncoming tractor trailer.
5

Contributing Factors

• Vehicle speed

• Use of a cell phone while driving

• Roadway conditions and/or weather
6

Recommendations

• Law enforcement agencies should establish and enforce standard 

operating procedures for the use of onboard vehicle equipment and 

other electronic devices, such as cell phones, when operating vehicles. 

• Law enforcement agencies should establish and enforce standard 

operating procedures for the maximum miles per hour over the posted 

speed limit a law enforcement officer may use when responding to a 

call.
7

Recommendations

• Law enforcement agencies and training academies should emphasize the 

driving skills of matching vehicle speed with roadway and environmental 

conditions.

• Law enforcement agencies and training academies should consider 

including in the training curriculum techniques for managing adrenaline 

surge. 

• Departments of transportation should consider the use of supplemental 

traffic control devices in addition to the minimum specified by the 

Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUCTD) to warn motorists of 

upcoming curves.
8

Trooper Crashes on 

Roadway While 

Responding to 

Reckless Driver 

Complaint—Kentucky

(NIOSH LEO 2016-02)

Download the full report: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/FACE/pdfs/L201602.pdf
9

Contact Us

Fatality Assessment and Control Evaluation 

Surveillance and Field Investigations Branch

Division of Safety Research, NIOSH

1000 Frederick Lane, M/S 1808

Morgantown, West Virginia 26505-2888

FACE Web Site: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/face/

Follow FACE on Twitter @NIOSHFACE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
KNICKERBOCKER VILLAGE INC.'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998, 
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998 
<CASH>                                           49708
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   451426
<ALLOWANCES>                                    282000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1649723
<PP&E>                                         7522743
<DEPRECIATION>                                  130527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                10402901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1896652
<BONDS>                                        6133688
<COMMON>                                        317048
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1207046
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  10402901
<SALES>                                        2521389
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2523366
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2355965
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              137924
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 167401
<INCOME-TAX>                                     95000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              72401
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     72401
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03495-SHS     Document 18      Filed 01/03/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-03495-SHS     Document 18      Filed 01/03/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-03495-SHS     Document 18      Filed 01/03/2008     Page 3 of 3
#### STATE v. STEPTOE

No. 121.

No. 8 (Spring Term)

Case below: 38 N.C. App. 243.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 3 November 1978.