alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release of Guarantee



 Exhibit 4.2 
 RELEASE OF GUARANTEE OF WARNER CHILCOTT LIMITED 
 1. Reference is hereby made to the Indenture, dated
as of January 18, 2005 (as amended, supplemented, waived or otherwise modified, the “Indenture”), by and between Warner Chilcott Corporation, the Guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee.
Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Indenture. 
 2. Pursuant to
Section 11.05(a)(1)(f), of the Indenture, Warner Chilcott Limited shall be released from its Guarantee under the Indenture if it requests such release at any time. 
 3. Warner Chilcott Limited hereby requests to be released from its Guarantee under the Indenture. 
 4. The
Issuer has delivered an Officers’ Certificate and an Opinion of Counsel to the Trustee certifying (a) compliance with Section 9.01, Section 11.05 and Section 12.04 of the Indenture and (b) that all conditions precedent
provided for in the Indenture to be performed or effected by the Issuer relating to the release of Warner Chilcott Limited from its Guarantee have been complied with. 
 5. The Trustee hereby acknowledges the termination and release of Warner Chilcott Limited from its Guarantee. 
 6. The parties hereto may sign one or more copies of this Release of Guarantee in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, but all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. 
 7. This Release of Guarantee is dated as of the date set forth below, and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
New York. 








			
	WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee
		
	By:	 	/s/ Martin Reed
		 	Name: Martin Reed
		 	Title: Vice President










			
	WARNER CHILCOTT LIMITED
		
	By:	 	/s/ Roger Boissonneault
	Name:	 	Roger Boissonneault
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer and President










			
	WARNER CHILCOTT CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Roger Boissonneault
	Name:	 	Roger Boissonneault
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer


 Dated: August 20, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  UT
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      462,351
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     25,647
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         122,400
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        97,373
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 707,771
<COMMON>                                        19,423
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       37,188
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            205,464
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 262,075
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,960
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           179,397
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  34,500
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 229,839
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  707,771
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      542,087
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            22,101
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     468,536
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     490,637
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         51,450
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,458
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  52,908
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        14,484
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,424
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         73
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   38,351
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        17,119  
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       10,627
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          72,505
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.18

<FN>
Capital-surplus-paid-in is net of $24,017 of treasury stock.

                                 

                                 Page 44
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, William Pulver,President and Chief Executive Officer of NetRatings, Inc. (the “Registrant”),do hereby certify in accordance with Rule 13a-14(b) under the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)                                  theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certificationis attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

Dated: March 16, 2005

 

 
|   | /s/ William Pulver                       |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | William Pulver                           |   |
|   | *President  and Chief Executive Officer* |   |

 

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toNetRatings and will be retained by NetRatings and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Auditors

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-38030) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Plan of
NetRatings, Inc. and 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of NetRatings, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-98857) pertaining to the
1998 Stock Plan of NetRatings, Inc., 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of NetRatings, Inc. and Options Assumed by NetRatings, Inc. and Granted Under the ACNielsen eRatings.com
2002 Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-90160) dated June 10, 2002, the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-99283) dated September 6, 2002 and
in the related Prospectuses, of our report dated February 14, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of NetRatings, Inc. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

|San Jose, California
March 25, 2003 |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|----------------------------------- |  | ---------------------

---

QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, D. Michael Parker, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: September 12, 2005 

 

/s/ D. Michael Parker

D. Michael Parker

Senior Vice President, Finance and

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Qorus.com, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2005, (the "Report"), I, Kevin R.
Keating, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)    The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.


Date:  March 22, 2006

                                               /s/ Kevin R. Keating
                                               -------------------------------
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               and Chief Financial Officer
#### RANKIN v. RINK and DRESSER v. RINK

No. 72 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 734.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 May 1979.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NELSON JUVINI GARCIA, AKA Nelson 

Garcia Juvini, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-71132 

Agency No. A046-056-905 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 12, 2018**

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Nelson Juvini Garcia, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions pro se for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal 

from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 19 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-71132 

§ 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Padilla-Martinez v. Holder, 770 F.3d 

825, 830 (9th Cir. 2014). We grant the petition for review.

The agency ordered Garcia removed for having been convicted of an 

aggravated felony crime of violence as described in 18 U.S.C. § 16(b). However, 

the BIA did not have the benefit of the Supreme Court’s decision in Sessions v. 

Dimaya, 138 S. Ct. 1204 (2018), holding that 18 U.S.C. § 16(b) is impermissibly 

vague. Accordingly, we remand to the BIA to consider Garcia’s removability in 

light of that decision.

Respondent’s motion to take judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 17) is denied 

as moot. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
Dealcheck.com Inc.
History of the name changes since inception

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     DATE
                                     INCORPORATED/
       NAME  OF  THE  COMPANY        NAME  CHANGED      MAIN  ACTIVITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1    Kamlo Gold Mines Limited        April 9, 1973      Mining exploration
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2    NRT Research Technologies Inc.  October 29, 1985   Development of a
                                                        new technology in
                                                        marine propulsion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3    NRT Industries Inc.             December 15,       Development of a
                                     1987               new technology in
                                                        marine propulsion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4    CUDA Consolidated Inc.           March 4, 1991     Distribution and
                                                        manufacturing of
                                                        snack food
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5    Foodquest Corp.                 September 27,      Distribution and
                                     1994               manufacturing of
                                                        snack food
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6    Foodquest International Corp.   November 18,       Distribution and
                                     1994               manufacturing of
                                                        snack food
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7    Dealcheck.com Inc.              December 31,       Internet
                                     1998               development
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


<PAGE>
#### STATE v. COGDELL

No. 30 PC.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 327.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 30 August 1974.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

William E. Webster III, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 1248 C.D. 2018

:

Lehigh County Adult :

Probation and Parole, :

Respondent :

O R D E R

NOW, April 25, 2019

, upon consideration of petitioner’s

application for re argument

, and respondent’s answer in response thereto, the

application is denied.

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

President Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ISSUER'S
INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED JUNE 30, 1998, SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING
FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                             304
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,705
<ALLOWANCES>                                       305
<INVENTORY>                                      4,469
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,617
<PP&E>                                          34,057
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,057
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,715
<BONDS>                                          8,908
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           819
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,473
<SALES>                                         25,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,074
<CGS>                                           18,871
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (309)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 326
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,348
<INCOME-TAX>                                       625
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                723
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       723
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
#### WATSON v. DEPT. OF CORRECTION

No. 423PC

Case below: 47 N.C. App. 718

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 October 1980.
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-9 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-9 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-9 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 3 of 3
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 31, 2017

s0524 

# Order

Clerk May 31, 2017

153309

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 153309

COA: 321551

Genesee CC: 13

- 033003

- FC

ANDREW MAURICE RANDOLPH,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 24, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this o rder

addressing: (1) whether a defendant’s failure to demonstrate plain error precludes a

finding of ineffective assistance of trial counsel; and, in particular, (2) whether the

prejudice standard under the third prong of plain error, People v Carines , 46 0 Mich 750,

763

- 764 (1999) (“affecting substantial rights”), is the same as the Strickland prejudice

standard, Strickland v Washington , 466 US 668, 694 (1984) (“reasonable probability” of

a different outcome). See United States v Dominguez Benitez , 542 US 74, 83 (2004);

People v Fackelman , 489 Mich 515, 537 n 16 (2011); People v Kowalski , 489 Mich 488,

510 n 38 (2011). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application

papers.
Order entered October 22, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00696-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF I. L. S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-09-7655

ORDER

We DENY appellant’s October 7, 2013 second motion for reconsideration of the 

dismissal order and the jurisdictional brief filed. This appeal is now proceeding under appellate 

cause number 05-13-00958-CV.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
##### 



EMULEX CORPORATION
 EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN
 Plan Purpose
   General Plan Description
  Eligibility
  Participation and Term
  Target Bonus Opportunity
     
  1 of 4




---



##### 



Bonus Award Criteria
   Chairman/CEO, President/COO,
officers, vice presidents senior directors
    
    EVP WW
SalesNet revenue performance
    
    
    45
    %
    
    
    50
    %Net operating income
    
    
    55
    %
    
    
    50
    %
  1.
    
    The target bonus percentage times the participants quarterly gross base salary equals
the overall award target.Example : 35% x $25,000 (quarterly salary) = $8,750 target award2.
    
    The weighting factors for net revenue, net operating income, and subjective as stated above
times the overall target award potential give the bonus target for each weighting factor.
 Example :
    
    45% x $8,750 = $3,938.00 (net revenue target)55% x $8,750 = $4,812.00 (net operating income target)
 3.
    
    An accelerator formula of 1.5 x % of performance less 50% (EVP, worldwide sales: 2.0 x % of
performance less 100%) will be used for each part of the quantitative bonus award calculation
to reinforce over-achievement opportunity as well as to minimize any bonus payments for
performance below fiscal AOP planned levels.Using the Example if the first quarter performance is 105% of net revenue and 110% of net
income:
 (105% x 1.50) less 50% = 157.5%  50% = 107.5% of net revenue target:1.075x $3,938.00 = $4,233.35 net revenue bonus payment(110% x 1.50) less 50% = 165%  50% = 115% of net operating income target:1.15% x $4,812.00 = $5,533.80 net operating income bonus paymenttotal first quarter bonus award for revenue and income = $9,767.15.
  2 of 4




---



##### 



(90% x 1.50) less 50% = 135%  50% = 85% of net revenue target:.85 x $3,938.00= $3,347.30 net revenue bonus payment(80% x 1.50) less 50% = 120%  50% = 70% of net operating income target:.70% x $4,812.00 = $3,368.40 net operating income bonus paymenttotal second quarter bonus award for revenue and income = $6,715.70
 4.
    
    Regardless of the award formula, no bonus payments will be granted unless 80% of both the net
revenue and net operating income goals for the quarter are achieved as identified by the Board
of Directors approved AOP.
 Discretionary Bonuses
  Payment of Awards
   Plan Administration
      3 of 4




---



##### 



Plan Term
  Foreign Currency Considerations
  Definitions
 Active Regular Full-time Employee
 Gross Base Salary
 Net Revenue:
 Net Operating Income:
 Termination for Cause:
 4 of 4