alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 221 (Thursday, November 17, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 69744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22895]



[[Page 69744]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE AGREEMENTS


Extension of Period of Determination on Request for Textile and 
Apparel Safeguard Action on Imports from China

November 15, 2005.
AGENCY: The Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements (the 
Committee).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is extending through November 30, 2005, the 
period for making a determination on whether to request consultations 
with China regarding imports of women's and girls' cotton and man-made 
fiber shirts and blouses, not-knit (Category 341/641).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay Dowling, Office of Textiles and 
Apparel, U.S. Department of Commerce, (202) 482-4058.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Authority: Section 204 of the Agriculture Act of 1956, as 
amended; Executive Order 11651, as amended.

BACKGROUND:

    On July 11, 2005, the Committee received a request from the 
American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition, the National Council of 
Textile Organizations, the National Textile Association, and UNITE HERE 
requesting that the Committee limit imports from China of women's and 
girls' cotton and man-made fiber shirts and blouses, not-knit (Category 
341/641) due to market disruption.
    The Committee determined that this request provided the information 
necessary for the Committee to consider the request and solicited 
public comments for a period of 30 days. See Solicitation of Public 
Comments on Request for Textile and Apparel Safeguard Action on Imports 
from China, 70 FR 44566 (August 3, 2005).
    The Committee's Procedures, 68 FR 27787 (May 21, 2003) state that 
the Committee will make a determination within 60 calendar days of the 
close of the public comment period as to whether the United States will 
request consultations with China. If the Committee is unable to make a 
determination within 60 calendar days, it will cause to be published a 
notice in the Federal Register, including the date by which it will 
make a determination.
    The 60-day determination period for this case expired on November 
1, 2005. However, the Committee decided to extend until November 8, 
2005, the period for making a determination on this case. See Extension 
of Period of Determination on Request for Textile and Apparel Safeguard 
Action on Imports from China, 70 FR 67456 (November 7, 2005). The 
Committee is further extending the determination period through 
November 30, 2005.

D. Michael Hutchinson,
Acting Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile 
Agreements.
[FR Doc. 05-22895 Filed 11-15-05; 4:05 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS
|   | (a)    | To the best of my knowledge, the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                        |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | (b)    | To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Laclede Gas Company. |

| Date:  |   | April 29, 2011 |   |   | /s/ Douglas H. Yaeger            |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------|
|   |   |                     |   |   | Douglas H. Yaeger                |
|   |   |                     |   |   | Chairman of the Board, President |
|   |   |                     |   |   | and Chief Executive Officer      |
|   |   |                     |   |   |                             |

|   | (a)    | To the best of my knowledge, the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                        |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | (b)    | To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Laclede Gas Company. |

| Date:  |   | April 29, 2011 |   |   | /s/ Mark D. Waltermire                          |
|--------|--------|---------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                |   |   | Mark D. Waltermire                              |
|   |   |                |   |   | Senior Vice President and                       |
|   |   |                |   |   |     Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   |                |   |   |                                            |
Exhibit 13.2  Section 906 Certificate  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Luxfer Holdings PLC, a public limited company incorporated under English law (the company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:  The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Form 20-F) of the company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.   Date:   March 19, 2015
/s/   Andrew Michael BeadenAndrew   Michael Beaden
Group   Finance Director
#### CULLEN WALSTON, Employee, Plaintiff v. BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, Employer and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier, Defendants

No. 116A81

(Filed 8 March 1982)

THIS cause is before us upon plaintiff’s petition to rehear and reconsider the decision of this Court rendered in this case on 12 January 1982.

The petition to rehear is allowed for the limited purpose of entering this order in the cause:

Plaintiff contends that the following statement contained in the opinion filed on 12 January 1982 is erroneous:

> *297“Disability caused by and resulting from a disease is compen-sable when, and only when, the disease is an occupational disease, or is aggravated or accelerated by an occupational disease.”

Plaintiffs contention has merit. The statement is hereby corrected to read as follows:

> “Disability caused by and resulting from a disease is compen-sable when, and only when, the disease is an occupational disease, or is aggravated or accelerated by causes and conditions characteristic of and peculiar to claimant’s employment.”

This order will be printed in the official reports of decisions of this Court.

Done by the Court in Conference, this 8th day of March 1982.

Mitchell, J.

For the Court
----

EXHIBIT 4.17

 

Debt Settlement Agreement

Between

San Antonios Resources Inc.

And 

[name]

 

Whereas San Antonios Resources Inc. ("Company") acknowledgesthat it is indebted to [name] in the amount of {US$xx] by virtue of the factthat [name] settled outstanding trade accounts of that amount owed by thecompany, the Company agrees to issue [number] of common shares to [name] tosettle the debt.. The closing of the shares for debt settlement will take placeat the election of the Company any time on or before [date] and such closingwill be marked by the issuance of Treasury shares.

 

Agreed to on this 27th day of August, 2002 by:

 

_/s/ Antonios Kripotos___________________Antonios Kripotos for **SAN ANTONIOS RESOURCES INC.
 

 **
/s/ signature**____________________________[name]**
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 34-11 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 1 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 34-11 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 2 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 34-11 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 3 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 34-11 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 4 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 34-11 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 5 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 34-11 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 6 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 34-11 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 7 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 34-11 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 8 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 34-11 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 9 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 34-11 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 10 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 34-11 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 11 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 34-11 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 12 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 34-11 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 13 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 34-11 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 14 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 34-11 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 15 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 34-11 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 16 of 16
| By/s/David L. Cheek                                                                                  David L. CheekPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 3, 2010 | By/s/Bert E. Downing, Jr.                                                                                       Bert E. Downing, Jr.Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller and TreasurerNovember 3, 2010 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### STATE v. SIMMONS

No. 13P83.

Case below: 60 N.C. App. 440.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 March 1983.
Case 1:07-cr-00368-RWS Document 13 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 1 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00368-RWS Document 13 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 2 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00368-RWS Document 13 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 3 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00368-RWS Document 13 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 4 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00368-RWS Document 13 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 5 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00368-RWS Document 13 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 6 of 6
#### STATE v. WILLIAM ANDERSON.

(Filed 15 June 1962.)

Appeal by defendant from *Williams, J.,*and *Burgwyn, E.J.,*October 1961 Criminal Term of AlamaNCe.

Defendant is charged in bills of indictment in cases Nos. 32, 78, 80, 109, 133 and 200, variously with the criminal offenses of larceny and felonious breaking and entering. There are six counts of larceny (two of them misdemeanors) and three counts of breaking and entering. The indictments in cases 32, 133 and 200 were returned by the grand juries of Guilford, Orange and Durham Counties respectively. These cases were removed to Alamance for trial. The other three cases were instituted in Alamance County.

Defendant entered pleas of guilty in all the cases before Williams, J., who presided during the first week of the two-weeks term.

Judge Williams imposed active prison sentences as follows: Case No. 32, 5 years; No. 78, 5 years, to begin at the expiration of the *337sentence in 32; in each of the cases, Nos. 80, 109, 133 and 200, not less than 3 nor more than 5 years.

Defendant moved before Burgwyn, E.J., who presided during the second week of the term, to vacate the sentences imposed by Judge Williams on the grounds that they were irregularly entered and defendant’s constitutional rights were violated by the sentencing procedure. The motion was overruled.

Defendant appeals from the sentences imposed and from the ruling on the motion.

*Attorney General Bruton for the State.*

*Dalton, Long & Latham for defendant.*

Pee Cukiam.

This is a companion appeal with *State v. Poye, ante*326. Pleas were entered and sentences imposed at the same time as in the *Poye*case. Defendant herein and Pope made identical motions to vacate judgments, and rely on the same facts and legal principles to support the motions. Except for the indictments, sentences and the names of the defendants, the records and briefs in the two appeals are in all material respects the same.

On the authority of the opinion in the *Poye*case, the judgments entered by Judge Williams and the ruling and order of Judge Burgwyn are

Affirmed.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00271

- CR

Gemma Perez

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 371st District Court

o f Tarrant County (1352364D )

Febru ary 26, 2015

Opinion by Justice Sudderth

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECO ND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

_____________ Justice Bonnie Sudderth
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 188 

To make revenue from certain duties imposed on goods imported from the 

People’s Republic of China available for border security, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2019 

Mrs. HYDE-SMITH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To make revenue from certain duties imposed on goods imported from the People’s Republic of China available 

for border security, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Border, Law Enforce5 ment, Operational Control, and Sovereignty Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR BORDER SECURITY. 

7 (a) TRANSFER OF CERTAIN REVENUE FROM DUTIES

8 TO SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY.— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 188 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treas2 ury shall transfer to the Secretary of Homeland Se3 curity from the general fund of the Treasury 

4 amounts determined by the Secretary of the Treas5 ury to be equivalent to 50 percent of the amounts 

6 received into the general fund that are attributable 

7 to duties imposed under section 301 of the Trade 

8 Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2411) with respect to goods 

9 imported from the People’s Republic of China on or 

10 after July 6, 2018. 

11 (2) ADMINISTRATION OF TRANSFERS.— 

12 (A) IN GENERAL.—The amounts required 

13 to be transferred under paragraph (1) shall be 

14 transferred not less frequently than quarterly 

15 from the general fund of the Treasury to the 

16 Secretary of Homeland Security on the basis of 

17 estimates made by the Secretary of the Treas18 ury of the amounts described in paragraph (1) 

19 that are received into the Treasury. 

20 (B) ADJUSTMENTS.—Proper adjustments 

21 shall be made in the amounts described in para22 graph (1) subsequently transferred under that 

23 paragraph to the extent prior estimates were in 

24 excess of, or less than, the amounts required to 

25 be transferred. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 188 IS

1 (b) USE OF FUNDS FOR BORDER SECURITY.— 

2 Amounts transferred under subsection (a) shall be avail3 able, without further appropriation, to the Secretary of 

4 Homeland Security to install physical barriers and roads 

5 described in section 102 of the Illegal Immigration Reform 

6 and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (division C of 

7 Public Law 104–208; 8 U.S.C. 1103 note), including for 

8 the construction of fencing and road improvements de9 scribed in subsection (b) of that section. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.1





     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the filing of the Annual  Report on Form 10KSB for the
year ended  December  31,  2001 (the  "Report")  by Elution  Technologies,  Inc.
(formerly Nostalgia  Motorcars,  Inc.), each of the undersigned hereby certifies
that:

     1.   The Report complies in all material  respects with the requirements of
          section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
          amended, and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of  the
          operations of Registrant.


Dated:  September 3, 2002
                                      /s/ Thomas Kreitzer
                                      ------------------------------
                                      Name: Thomas Kreitzer
                                      Title: Interim Chief Executive Officer


                                      /s/ Thomas Kreitzer
                                      -------------------------------
                                      Name:  Thomas Kreitzer
                                      Title: Principal Accounting Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Form 10-Q
of The Lamson & Sessions Co. (the "Company") for the period ended July 5, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on July 30,
2003 (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies that, to
such officer's knowledge:

     (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
              expressed in the Report.

     A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and shall not be deemed to be a part of the Report or "filed" for any
purpose whatsoever.



Date:  July 30, 2003                     /s/ John B. Schulze
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         John B. Schulze
                                         Chairman of the Board, President and
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)
#### COLEMAN v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM

No. 341P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 137.

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 July 1982.
Exhibit 14.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-111303, 333-34420 and 333-73650), pertaining to the Jacada Ltd. 2003 Share Option and Incentive Plan and the Jacada Ltd. 1999 Share Option and Incentive
Plan, of our report dated June 30, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Jacada Ltd. and its subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2010.



|                 |  |                                 
|---------------- |  | --------------------------------
|Tel-Aviv, Israel |  | KOST, FORER, GABBAY and KASIERER
|                 | 
|June 30, 2011    |  | A member of Ernst & Young Global
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 1844** 

CHANDER KANT; ASHIMA K. KANT , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,

v.

JAY L. COHEN , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Roger W. Titus , District Judge. ( 8:08

- cv
- 00318

- RWT )

Submitted : January 6, 2012 Decided: March 8, 2012

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Chander Kant , Ashi ma K. Kant , Appellants Pro Se. Jay L. Cohen, Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Chander Kant and Ashima K. Kant appeal the district

court ’s order affirming the clerk’s order taxing costs. We ha ve reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons s tated by the district court. See

Kant v. Cohen , No. 8:08

- cv
- 00318

- RWT (D. Md. filed July 11,
2011; entered July 12, 2011). We dispense with oral argument

becaus e the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### BLACK v. INSURANCE CO.

No. 266 PC.

Case below: 42 N.C. App. 50.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 September 1979.