alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Abatement Order filed August 1, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00170-CR

____________

CORNELIUS JACKSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-CCR-163243

ABATEMENT ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due April 9, 2013. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. On May 14, 2013, this court ordered the court reporter to file the record 

within 30 days. When the court reporter failed to file the record as ordered, this 

court ordered the court reporter to file the record within 30 days, and instructed the 

court reporter that if the record was not filed, the court could order the trial court to 

conduct a hearing to determine the reason for failure to file the record. The record 
has not been filed with the court. The trial and appellate courts are jointly 

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.3(c). Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely as ordered, we 

issue the following order.

We direct the judge of the County Court at Law No. 2 to conduct a hearing 

at which the court reporter, appellant’s counsel, and the State’s counsel shall 

participate (a) to determine the reason for failure to file the record; (b) to establish 

a date certain when the reporter’s record will be filed, and (c) to make findings as 

to whether the court reporter should be held in contempt of court for failing to file 

the reporter’s record timely as ordered. We order the court to prepare a record, in 

the form of a reporter’s record, of the hearing. The judge shall make findings of 

fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward to this court a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions. The hearing 

record and supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with the clerk of this court 

within 30 days of the date of this order. 

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will 

also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or 

the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. If the court reporter files the 

record prior to the date set for the hearing, the appeal will be reinstated and the trial 

court need not hold a hearing.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, William A. Shumaker, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying
officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 10, 2007



/s/ William A. ShumakerWilliam A. ShumakerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Case 1:07-cv-03273-RJH Document 15 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03273-RJH Document 15 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from Keytone
Consolidated Industries,  Inc.'s consolidated financial statements for the three
months ended March 31, 2000 and is  qualified  in its  entirety by reference to
such.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  52,594
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,390
<INVENTORY>                                    60,135
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               128,507
<PP&E>                                         358,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                 210,645
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 421,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          145,158
<BONDS>                                        100,525
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       10,790
<OTHER-SE>                                     34,387
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   421,070
<SALES>                                        96,422
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               96,570
<CGS>                                          89,981
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  89,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,995
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               93
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,243)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,320)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,932)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,932)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.19)



</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATIONS **Exhibit 31.1
   
I, Harry Lee Waterfield II, certify that:
  
1.
I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kentucky Investors, Inc.;
  
2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
  
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
  
4.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and we have:
   
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared,
   
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation, and
   
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
  
5.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:
   
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
   
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
  

Date: August 11, 2004
By: /s/ Harry Lee Waterfield II 
Harry Lee Waterfield II 
President
** ******
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 2 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 3 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 4 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 5 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 6 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 7 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 8 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 9 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 10 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 11 of 11
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 99.1
                                  ------------

                Letter Regarding Arthur Andersen Representations

To the Securities and Exchange Commission:

     We received a letter from Arthur Andersen LLP, dated May 15, 2002,
representing that the audit as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001, was
subject to their quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing
practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in
compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of
Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit and availability of national
office consultation, and availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of
Arthur Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Steven M. Kantor
----------------------------
Steven M. Kantor

Vice President, Finance (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)


Date  May 16, 2002
    ----------------
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, T exas** 

January 9, 2023

No. 04

- 22

- 00671

- CR

Taylor Eugene KREGEAR

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court

, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 2572

- CR

- C

Honorable Jessica Crawford , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s court

- appointed attorney has filed a brief and motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel certifies he served copies of the brief and motion on appellant, informed appellant of his right to review the record and file his own brief, informed a ppellant of his right to seek discretionary review should the court of appeals declare the appeal frivolous, and provided appellant with a form for requesting the record and explained to appellant the procedure for obtaining the record. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State

, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.). As of the date of this order, appellant has not filed the r ecord

- request motion provided to him by his counsel.

If appellant desires to file a pro se brief, we ORDER that he do so by February 8, 2023

. If appellant files a timely pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later th an thirty days after appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court.

We further ORDER the motion to withdraw filed by appellant’s counsel held in abeyance pending further order of the court. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80

– 82 (1988) (holding that mo tion to withdraw should not be ruled on before appellate court independently reviews record to determine whether counsel’s evaluation that appeal is frivolous is sound);

Schulman v. State , 252 S.W.3d 403, 410

– 11 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (same).

Enter ed on this 9 th day of January 2023.PER CURIAM

Attested to:

________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 6738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2324]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Meeting of the National Museum and Library Services Board

AGENCY: Institute of Museum and Library Services.

ACTION: Notice of meeting, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects a notice published in the Federal 
Register on February 2, 2005, at 70 FR 5494. In that notice, the time 
and date of the Fourth Meeting of National Museum and Library Services 
Board was inadvertently published as 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. on Wednesday, 
February 9, 2005. The correct date of the Fourth Meeting of National 
Museum and Library Services Board is 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. on Wednesday, 
February 16, 2005. This action corrects that error. The agenda and 
address of the meeting remain as announced on February 2, 2005, at 70 
FR 5494.

DATES: 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. on Wednesday, February 16, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Lyons, Special Assistant to 
the Director, Institute of Museum and Library Services, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 510, Washington, DC 20506--(202) 606-
4649.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Institute of Museum and Library 
Services' notice of meeting published on February 2, 2005, at 70 FR 
5494, the date of the Fourth Meeting of National Museum and Library 
Services Board has been corrected as set forth in the Time/Date section 
of this notice. No other information has been changed. Notice of this 
meeting is required under the Sunshine in Government Act.

    Dated: February 2, 2005.
Teresa LaHaie,
Administrative Officer, National Foundation on the Arts and the 
Humanities, Institute of Museum and Library Services.
[FR Doc. 05-2324 Filed 2-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7036-01-M
```
---

CONSENT OF EXPERT

The undersigned hereby consents to the inclusion in the Annual
Report on Form 20-F (Annual Report) of Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (the
Company) for the year ended August 31, 2017 of references to, and the
information derived from, the report titled Independent Technical Report on the
Waterberg Project Including Mineral Resource Update and Pre-Feasibility Study,
dated effective October 17, 2016, and to the references, as applicable, to the
undersigneds name included in or incorporated by reference with respect to the
disclosure of technical and scientific information contained in the Annual
Report (the Technical Information). The undersigned further consents to the
incorporation by reference in the Companys Registration Statement on Form F-10
(No. 333-213985), as amended and supplemented, filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission, of the references to the undersigneds name
and the Technical Information in the Annual Report.

/s/ Robert L.
GoosenRobert L.
Goosen           
Date: December 29, 2017

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 13.1

                          O2Micro International Limited

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of O2Micro International Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F/A for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of Sterling Du,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Perry Kuo, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


Date: May 26, 2005                                    /s/ STERLING DU
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                        Sterling Du
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: May 26, 2005                                    /s/ PERRY KUO
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                         Perry Kuo
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.3

Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350

Solely for the purposes of complying
with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wisconsin
Power and Light Company (the Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge,
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Erroll B. Davis, Jr. Erroll B. Davis, Jr.  Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer

/s/ Eliot G. Protsch Eliot G. Protsch  Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer

November 13, 2003
1 The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beverly Stites Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-2593

___________ Mark Randall Davis, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Frank Atkinson, Sheriff, Sebastian * Western District of Arkansas. County, Arkansas; John Doe, Jailer, * [UNPUBLISHED] Sebastian County Detention Center, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: August 29, 2003 Filed: September 4, 2003

___________ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Arkansas inmate Mark Randall Davis appeals from the district court’s 1 preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon careful review of the-2- record, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons the district court stated. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Case 7:07-cr-00374-CLB Document 19 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
4.11


 


DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES


 


The
following description of certain terms of OncoCyte Corporation (“Oncocyte”) common stock is a summary and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to (i) Oncocyte’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended, (ii) Oncocyte’s Amended and
Restated Bylaw, and (iii) the California General Corporation Law.


 


Common
Stock


 


The
Oncocyte Articles of Incorporation currently authorize the issuance of up to 85,000,000 shares of common stock, no par value.
Each holder of record of common stock is entitled to one vote for each outstanding share owned, on every matter properly submitted
to the shareholders for their vote; provided, that if any shareholder entitled to vote at a meeting at which directors are to
be elected gives timely notice of their intention to cumulate votes in the election of directors, shareholders may cumulate votes
for the election of directors.


 


Subject
to the dividend rights of holders of any preferred stock that may be issued from time to time, holders of common stock are entitled
to any dividend declared by the Oncocyte Board of Directors out of funds legally available for that purpose.


 


Subject
to the prior payment of the applicable liquidation preference to holders of any preferred stock that may be issued from time to
time, holders of common stock are entitled to receive on a pro rata basis all remaining assets available for distribution to the
holders of common stock in the event of the liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of Oncocyte’s operations.


 


Holders
of common stock do not have any preemptive, subscription, redemption, or conversion rights. There are no redemption or sinking
fund provisions applicable to the common stock. The rights, powers, preferences and privileges of holders of Oncocyte common stock
will be subject to those of the holders of any shares of Oncocyte preferred stock that may be issued in the future.
#### STATE v. McCOY

No. 26 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 524.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 March 1977.