alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.02

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Kathleen R. McElwee,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report of VA  Software  Corporation  on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July
31, 2005 fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that  information  contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K  fairly  presents in all  material  respects  the  financial
condition and results of operations of VA Software Corporation. .


                                   By:     /s/  KATHLEEN R. MCELWEE
                                      ------------------------------------
                                   Name: Kathleen R. McElwee
                                   Title: Chief Financial Officer and
                                          Senior Vice President


                                       82
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Gideon A. Schor (GS-5932) 

Kenneth M. Murray (KM-8728) 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

1301 Avenue of the Americas, 40th Floor 

New York, NY 10019 

Tel.: (212) 999-5800 

Fax: (212) 999-5899 

Nina F. Locker (admitted pro hac vice) 

Jennifer J. Lee (JL-6985) 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Tel.: (650) 493-9300 

Fax: (650) 493-6811 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Allot Communications Ltd., Yigal Jacoby, 

Rami Hadar, and Adi Sapir 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE ALLOT COMMUNICATIONS LTD. 

SECURITIES LITIGATION 

This Document Relates To: 

ALL ACTIONS 

MASTER FILE 

07 Civ. 3455 (RJH) 

DECLARATION OF GIDEON A. SCHOR 

IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED 

CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION 

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF 

FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS 

I, Gideon A. Schor, declare that: 

1. I am an attorney with the New York, New York, office of the law firm of Wilson 

Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation, counsel for defendants Allot 

Communications Ltd. (“Allot”), Yigal Jacoby, Rami Hadar, and Adi Sapir (collectively, 

“Defendants”). I submit this declaration in support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Amended 

Consolidated Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws. Unless 

 -1- 

Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 39 Filed 08/08/2008 Page 1 of 2
otherwise stated, the following facts are within my personal knowledge or are based on review of 

public records. 

1. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of Allot’s registration 

statement on Form F-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on October 

31, 2006. The filing included Allot’s preliminary prospectus; Exhibit 1 includes the cover page 

of the preliminary prospectus. 

 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the November 15, 2006 

Notice of Effectiveness for the filing of Allot’s registration statement on Form F-1. 

 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of Allot’s final prospectus 

dated November 15, 2006. 

4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of Allot’s Form 6-K, filed 

with the SEC on February 14, 2007, attaching Allot’s February 13, 2007 earnings release. 

5. Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of the Form 8-K of 

Packeteer, Inc. (“Packeteer”), filed with the SEC on April 4, 2007, attaching Packeteer’s April 4, 

2007 earnings release. 

6. Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of the April 2007 stock 

price data for Packeteer from www.streetinsider.com. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true 

and correct. 

Executed this 8th day of August, 2008, at New York, New York. 

/s/ Gideon A. Schor 

Gideon A. Schor 

 -2- 

Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 39 Filed 08/08/2008 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 13.1**13.1** **Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of ENEL S.p.A. (the“Company”), does hereby certify to such officer’s knowledge, that:The Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Form20-F”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: June 28, 2007                                              /s/   Name:  Fulvio Conti   Title:  Chief Executive Officer                                            /s/   Name:  Luigi Ferraris   Title:  Chief Financial Officer                                            /s/   Name:  Claudio Machetti   Title:  Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) has beenprovided to Enel S.p.A. and will be retained by Enel S.p.A. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Bray, Annunziata and Overton 

BILLY B. HARMAN 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 1832-98-3 PER CURIAM 

 JANUARY 19, 1999 

B & P CONSTRUCTION AND 

 HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Ginger Jonas Largen; Morefield, Kendrick, 

Hess & Largen, on brief), for appellant. 

 (Michael F. Blair; Penn, Stuart & Eskridge, 

on brief), for appellees. 

 Billy B. Harman ("claimant") contends that the Workers' 

Compensation Commission ("commission") erred in finding that 

B & P Construction and its insurer (hereinafter referred to as 

"employer") proved that claimant was capable of performing his 

pre-injury work. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the 

parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. 

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. See

Rule 5A:27. 

 On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable 

to the prevailing party below. See R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v. 

Mullins, 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990). "[I]t 

is fundamental that a finding of fact made by the Commission is 

conclusive and binding upon this court on review. A question 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, recodifying Code § 17-116.010, 

this opinion is not designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

raised by conflicting medical opinion is a question of fact." 

Commonwealth v. Powell, 2 Va. App. 712, 714, 347 S.E.2d 532, 533 

(1986). 

 In granting employer's application, the commission accepted 

the opinions of Drs. Jim Brasfield and John Jane, treating 

neurosurgeons, who opined that claimant was capable of returning 

to his regular employment. The commission also accepted the 

opinion of Dr. Paul Kelley, who evaluated claimant and determined 

that claimant's psychological problems did not prevent him from 

engaging in his regular employment. 

 In so ruling, the commission rejected the contrary opinions 

of Drs. Calvin Johnson, Barry Friedman, and Neil Dubner. The 

commission articulated legitimate reasons for giving more weight 

to the opinions of Drs. Brasfield, Jane, and Kelly. Those 

opinions provide credible evidence to support the commission's 

findings, which are binding upon us on appeal. See James v. 

Capitol Steel Constr. Co., 8 Va. App. 512, 515, 382 S.E.2d 487, 

488 (1989). "The fact that there is contrary evidence in the 

record is of no consequence if there is credible evidence to 

support the commission's finding." Wagner Enters., Inc. v. 

Brooks, 12 Va. App. 890, 894, 407 S.E.2d 32, 35 (1991). 

 For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision. 

 Affirmed.
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 32 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 32 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 32 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 24 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 2 of 2
FIRE AERIAL LADDERS:

IMPROVING EASE AND SAFETY WITH SMALLER RUNG SPACING

Currently, fire aerial ladders have 14” rung spacing, which may not be 

the best ergonomic design for firefighters. Researchers tested 12” rung 

spacing and compared it to 14” rung spacing.

Reduced rung spacing resulted in:

Increased climbing speed 

Increased toe/foot clearance

Reduced ankle twisting

Reduced hand forces

Reduced foot forces

Potential benefits:

Lower muscle/joint stress

Lower risk of tripping

Better climbing efficiency

Better climbing safety

12” vs 14”

Photo courtesy of: Emily Renner and 

The Granville Volunteer Fire Department 

For more information visit: WWW.CDC.GOV/NIOSH/FIREFIGHTERS/ 

JUNE 2022

Simeonov P, Hsiao H, Armstrong T, Fu A, Woolley C, Kau T-Y. (2020). Effects of aerial ladder 

rung spacing on firefighter climbing biomechanics. Applied Ergonomics 82, 102911. 

 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102911
Exhibit 32.1


                                CERTIFICATION OF
                      PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, the undersigned, Derek L. Caldwell, who
is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Lincoln International
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2005, (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Sec.13(a) or Sec.15(d) as applicable, of
the Securities Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ Derek L. Caldwell
                                           -------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Derek L. Caldwell
                                   Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
                                    Date:  December 9, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group; Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Biology Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         October 23, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Gaithersburg Hilton, 620 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, MD 20877.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Gopal M. Bhatnagar, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, National  Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 6100 Bldg Rm 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 435-6889.                         *bhatnagg@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 20, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-4808 Filed 9-28-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Enstar Group, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,
certifies that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

                                          /s/ Nimrod T. Frazer
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Nimrod T. Frazer
                                          Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)

November 9, 2005

   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Enstar Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Enstar Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                       30
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lindsay Semple, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, of Global Precision Medical Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's  ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's  internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  July 13, 2004

/s/ Lindsay Semple

Lindsay Semple

Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer



1
#### STATE v. HUNT

No. 47 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 315.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 November 1978. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 3 November 1978.
Case 1:06-cv-15154-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
KNICKERBOCKER VILLAGE INC. FORM 10 QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         721,944
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  444,418
<ALLOWANCES>                                   304,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,045,942
<PP&E>                                       7,411,383
<DEPRECIATION>                                 262,441
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,133,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,543,341
<BONDS>                                      6,018,866
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       317,048
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,568,159
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,133,216
<SALES>                                      5,242,797
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,256,112
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,730,536
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             272,491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                525,576
<INCOME-TAX>                                   236,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            289,576
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   289,576
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOHN TRIPODI

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 658

[ May 21, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; Sherwood Bauer , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 432016CF000692A

.

John Tripodi, Perry, pro se.

No brief filed for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., G ROSS and F ORST

, JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### ELLER v. PORTER-HAYDEN CO.

No. 64 PC

Case below: 48 NC App 508

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 December 1980.
#### CHURCH v. PARSONS TRUCKING

No. 321 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 164.

Petition by defendant for certiorari is allowed and cause is remanded to the North Carolina Court of Appeals for appropriate proceedings and hearing on the merits 6 October 1981.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 70784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23255]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Materials Technical Advisory Committee; Notice of Closed Meeting

    The Materials Technical Advisory Committee will meet on December 8, 
2005, at 10:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 3884, 14th 
Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The Committee 
advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration 
with respect to technical questions that affect the level of export 
controls applicable to materials and related technology.
    The Committee will meet only in closed session to discuss matters 
determined to be exempt from the provisions relating to public meetings 
found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 sections 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The Assistant 
Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of the delegate of 
the General Counsel, formally determined on November 18, 2005, pursuant 
to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 
U.S.C. app. 2 section (10)(d)), that the portions of this meeting 
dealing with pre-decisional changes to the Commerce Control List and 
U.S. export control policies and the portions of this meeting 
disclosing privileged and confidential business information shall be 
exempt from the provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 
U.S.C. app. 2 sections 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The entire meeting will 
include discussion concerning these matters.
    For more information, contact Yvette Springer on 202-482-4814.

    Dated: November 18, 2005.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-23255 Filed 11-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-M
#### BATISTE v. HOME PRODUCTS CORP.

No. 55 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 1.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 April 1977.