alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 230 (Thursday, December 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 72125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23574]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-05-044]


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: December 7, 2005 at 11 a.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. No. 731-TA-1098 (Preliminary) (Liquid Sulfur Dioxide from 
Canada)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to 
transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on or before 
December 8, 2005; Commissioners' opinions are currently scheduled to be 
transmitted to the Secretary of Commerce on or before December 15, 
2005.)
    5. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-639 and 640 (Second Review) (Forged Stainless 
Steel Flanges from India and Taiwan)--briefing and vote. (The 
Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and 
Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before 
December 16, 2005.)
    6. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: November 29, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-23574 Filed 11-29-05; 2:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### STATE v. PERRY

No. 47PC

Case below: 50 NC App 540

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 May 1981. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 May 1981.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

LISA-ATHENA S. ABU HANTASH, in her 

individual capacity and as mother and natural 

guardian of JORDAN-ANNETTEE JAZZMIN 

RICHARDSON, a minor, and JORDAN 

RICHARDSON, INC., a Virginia Corporation, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 

-against- 

 

V MODEL MANAGEMENT NEW YORK, INC. 

and VNY MODEL MANAGEMENT, LLC, 

 

 Defendants. 

 Docket No.: 07 Civ. 3363 (GBD) (KNF) 

 

AFFIRMATION OF GAVIN I. 

HANDWERKER, ESQ. IN SUPPORT 

OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION 

(ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED) 

 GAVIN I. HANDWERKER, ESQ., an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the state 

and federal courts of New York affirms the following to be true under penalty of perjury: 

1. I am a principal of the law firm Nissenbaum Law Group, LLC, attorneys for the 

Plaintiffs, Lisa–Athena S. Abu Hantash, in her individual capacity and as mother and natural 

guardian of Jordan-Annettee Jazzmin Richardson, a minor, and Jordan Richardson, Inc. As such, 

I am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances surrounding the within matter. 

2. I submit this affirmation in support of Plaintiffs’ motion for the entry of an Order: 

(a) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f), striking certain portions of paragraphs 22, 34, 35, 36, 65, 

66, 67, 73, 75, 77, 79, 89, 98, 99, 109, 110, 111 and 134 of Defendants’ verified answer; (b) 

pursuant to Rule 12(f), striking Defendants’ Eighth Affirmative Defense; (c) pursuant to Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 11(c), ordering sanctions against the Defendants and their counsel for violating, inter alia, 

Rule 8 and Rule 11; (d) awarding attorney’s fees, costs and disbursements for the within motion; 

and, (f) granting such other, further and different relief as to this Court seems just, equitable and 

proper under the circumstances. 

Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 10 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 1 of 2
-2-

3. The within matter was commenced by the filing of a summons and verified 

complaint on April 30, 2007. A true and accurate copy of Plaintiffs’ complaint (without exhibits) 

is annexed hereto as Exhibit A. 

4. Service of the summons and complaint on Defendants V Model Management and 

VNY Model Management were effectuated on May 9, 2007 and May 2, 2007, respectively. 

5. On May 24, 2007, my office received a copy of Defendants’ verified answer, 

affirmative defenses and counterclaim. A true and accurate copy of Defendants’ verified answer, 

affirmative defenses and counterclaim are annexed hereto as Exhibit B. 

6. No prior application for the relief sought herein has been made to this or any other 

court of competent jurisdiction. 

 WHEREFORE it is respectfully requested that the court grant the within application in its 

entirety together with such other, further and different relief as to the Court seems just, equitable 

and proper under the circumstances. 

Affirmed: May 31, 2007 

 /S/ GAVIN I. HANDWERKER 

GAVIN I. HANDWERKER (GIH6191)

Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 10 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 2 of 2
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 30, 2020

NO. 03-19-00792-CV

Z. B., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the final decree signed by the trial court on October 15, 2019. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s final decree. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s final decree. 

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
United States Securities & Exchange Commission EDGAR Filing


EXHIBIT 10.2

“Summary Sheet” of Employment Agreement

With Dennis McGuire

On May 5, 2009, the board of directors of Ecosphere Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) approved an amendment to the compensation arrangement with Dennis McGuire, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Mr. McGuire receives $250,000 per year for a two-year term beginning May 1, 2009 and terminating on April 30, 2009. He also receives a bonus of 3% of the Company’s revenues from operations, including licensing revenues from any transaction with Bledsoe Capital Group, LLC or a similar licensing arrangement. In addition, Mr. McGuire shall be eligible for an annual bonus at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ZANE LOVE.

(Filed 22 March, 1967.)

1. Criminal Law § 93—

Motion to sequester the witnesses is addressed to the discretion of the trial court, and the refusal of the motion is not reviewable.

S. Criminal Law § 162—

The exclusion of evidence is not shown to be prejudicial when the record fails to disclose the excluded evidence.

Appeal by defendant from *Fronebérger, J.,*September 5, 1966 Regular Criminal Session, MecKLENburg Superior Court.

The defendant, Zane Love, Stephen Vann Starnes, and Johnny Wayne Gurley, were indicted for the felony of robbery with firearms, and by their threatened use, the defendants did feloniously rob and forcibly take from Richard Lee Holshouser his wallet and contents of the total value of approximately $10.

The Court, upon a showing of indigency, appointed Mr. John G. Plumides attorney for the appellant. After trial, in which the defendants all testified, the jury returned verdicts finding each guilty of common law robbery. The Court imposed on each a prison sentence of 3 years. Zane Love appealed.

The State’s witness, Holshouser, testified the defendants assaulted him, struck him many times, inflicting wounds which required medical treatment. By the threatened use of knives, the defendants forcibly took from the witness his billfold and contents. The appellant, as well as his two co-defendants, testified, admitted they were *692out with Holshouser, but denied they took his pocketbook or any money from him. The jury returned verdicts of guilty as to all the defendants. From the sentence of 3 years, Zane Love appealed.

*T. W. Bruton, Attorney General, Harry W. McGalliard, Deputy Attorney General, for the State.*

*Plumides & Plumides by John G. Plumides and Jerry W. Whitley for the defendant appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The appellant’s first assignment of error challenges the Court’s refusal to sequester the witnesses upon the appellant’s motion. The refusal was in the Court’s discretion and not reviewable. *State v. Spencer,*239 N.C. 604, 80 S.E. 2d 670. Another assignment involved the admissibility of evidence. Any error in this respect was cured by the failure to place in the record the excluded evidence so the Court could determine its materiality. In one instance evidence of the same import was admitted without objection.

The record does not disclose any reason why the verdict and judgment should be disturbed.

No error.
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 36-18 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 36-18 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 36-18 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 36-18 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 36-18 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 36-18 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 36-18 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 36-18 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 36-18 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 36-18 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 36-18 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 36-18 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 36-18 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 36-18 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 36-18 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 36-18 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 16 of 16
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Blue Coat Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian NeSmith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/S/    BRIAN
NESMITHBrian NeSmithChief Executive OfficerBlue Coat Systems, Inc.July 28, 2003
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .


                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

Northern Border Pipeline Company
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               2002     2003       2004     2005       2006
                                             -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
<S>                                          <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Fixed charges:
Interest expensed and capitalized             51,550    44,903    41,374    42,792    43,218
Estimate of interest within rental expense       276       272       236       272       287
                                             -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
Total fixed charges                           51,826    45,175    41,610    43,064    43,505
                                             -------   -------   -------   -------   -------

Earnings:
Pretax income from continuing operations     142,719   148,200   166,777   152,246   129,845
Fixed charges                                 51,826    45,175    41,610    43,064    43,505
                                             -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
Total earnings                               194,545   193,375   208,387   195,310   173,350
                                             -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges              3.75      4.28      5.01      4.54      3.98
                                             =======   =======   =======   =======   =======
</TABLE>
Exhibit 15.8







| |                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | Gaffney,
                           Cline & Associates



(Consultants)
Pte. Ltd.



80
Anson Road



#31-01C
Fuji Xerox Towers



Singapore
079907



Telephone:
+65 6225 6951




www.gaffney-cline.com
| |                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| |                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | 29th
March, 2017                                                                                                                                                                                         









CNOOC
Limited



No.
25, Chaoyangmenbei Daijie



Dongcheng
District



Beijing
100010,



P.R.
China





Dear
Sir,



Consent
of Gaffney, Cline & Associates



As
independent reserve engineers for CNOOC Limited (CNOOC), Gaffney, Cline & Associates (GCA) hereby confirms that it has granted
and not withdrawn its consent to the references to GCA and to the inclusion of information contained in our reports entitled “Executive
Report for Reserves Estimation of the Missan Oil Fields in Eastern Iraq as at 31st December, 2016” and “Executive
Report for Reserves Estimation of the Greater Angostura Fields in Block 2C, Trinidad & Tobago as at 31st December,
2016” as of March, 2017 prepared for CNOOC, and to the annexation of our reports as an exhibit on Form 20-F in CNOOC’s
Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission Act of 1934.



Yours
faithfully,



Gaffney,
Cline & Associates (Consultants) Pte Ltd



|/s/
                                         Stephen M. Lane
|------------------------------------------------------------
|Stephen
    M. Lane                                         
|Technical
    Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,538
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,538)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               107,599
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                107,599
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            107,599
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   107,599
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .001
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .001



</TABLE>
#### CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM v. SUTCLIFFE

No. 45 PC.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 748.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 May 1974.
#### ANN THOMAS DAWSON v. ROBERT WAYNE DAWSON.

(Filed 23 September, 1964.)

Divorce and Alimony § 14-

Testimony of a witness by deposition that defendant bad sexual intercourse with her forcibly and against her will, and was prosecuted therefor, is sufficient to be submitted to the jury in plaintiff's action for divorce on the ground of adultery.

Appeal by plaintiff from *McLaughlin, J.,*April 27, 1964, Session of Moore.

Action for absolute divorce on the ground of adultery and for custody of the child of the marriage. Defendant did not file answer. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, the court, “on its own motion,” being of the opinion the evidence “as to the charge of adultery was not sufficient to be submitted to the jury,” entered judgment of non-suit. Plaintiff excepted and appealed.

*H. F. Seawell, Jr., for plaintiff appellant.*

*No counsel contra.*

Per Curiam.

The evidence offered by plaintiff and admitted by the court was sufficient to require submission of the case to the jury. It includes the testimony of the woman with whom plaintiff alleged defendant had committed adultery. She testified, by deposition, that de*495fendant had sexual intercourse with her forcibly and against her will and was prosecuted therefor. This testimony was in accord with and supports plaintiff's allegations. Hence, the judgment of nonsuit is reversed.

Reversed.
Exhibit 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Keystone Consolidated Industries,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Bert E. Downing, Jr., Vice President and Corporate Controller (Chief Financial
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



/s/  Bert E. Downing, Jr.
--------------------------------------------------
Bert E. Downing, Jr.
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Treasurer
November 14, 2002
**Exhibit 10.47A**

**KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION**

**RESOLUTION TO AMEND**

**FISCAL YEAR 2008 INCENTIVE BONUS PLAN**

**TO ADDRESS CHANGE OF CONTROL**

**December 5, 2007**

The following Resolution related to the Company’s Fiscal Year 2008 Incentive Bonus Plan was approved by the Board of Directors on December 5, 2007: 

RESOLVED, that the Kewaunee Scientific Corporation Fiscal Year 2008 Incentive Bonus Plan be amended to add the following new section: 

Section 6. Immediately prior to a Change of Control, as such term is defined in the Company’s 2000 Key Employee Stock Option Plan, the Fiscal Year 2008Incentive Bonus Plan will terminate and the bonus amounts earned under the Plan will be paid to each participant at that time. The bonus amounts will be calculated as shown in Attachment A, giving consideration to the level of year-to-datepretax earnings for each applicable operational unit through the most recent month-end in which the financial results have been calculated and reported by management. Such results will be compared to the operational unit pretax earnings goalsthrough the related month-end and the bonus amount prorated based on the percentage of the performance period passed immediately before the Change of Control date. The year-to-date pretax earnings shall exclude the positive or negative impact of anyfinancial adjustments related to the Change of Control. A participant must be an employee of the Company immediately prior to the Change of Control to be eligible for the bonus.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 11

11. Statement re computation of per share earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Second Quarter Ended          Six Months Ended
                                                        March 31,                  March 31,
                                                  1998          1997           1998          1997
                                                  ----          ----           ----          ----

<S>                                           <C>           <C>            <C>           <C>         
Net income (loss) in thousands                $       779   $      (338)   $     1,875   $    (1,176)

Shares outstanding at beginning of period
                                                7,667,227     7,537,169      7,664,253     7,450,878
Net issuance of shares under stock award
plans, weighted average                           131,271        72,750         77,126        90,952
                                              -----------   -----------    -----------   -----------

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic
earnings per share calculation                  7,798,498     7,609,919      7,741,379     7,541,830

Effect of dilutive securities:
Assumed exercise of stock options,
  weighted average of incremental shares
                                                  184,398            --        235,518            --
Assumed purchase of stock under stock
purchase plan, weighted average
                                                   24,668            --         38,430            --
                                              -----------   -----------    -----------   -----------
Weighted average shares and common share
  equivalents - diluted earnings per share      8,007,564     7,609,919      8,015,327     7,541,830
                                              ===========   ===========    ===========   ===========
calculation

Basic earning (loss) per share                $       .10   $      (.04)   $       .24   $      (.16)
                                              ===========   ===========    ===========   ===========

Diluted earnings (loss) per share             $       .10   $      (.04)   $       .23   $      (.16)
                                              ===========   ===========    ===========   ===========
</TABLE>