alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 26, 2007 / Presidential Documents 54811 

Proclamation 8179 of September 21, 2007 

Gold Star Mother’s Day, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

The gift of liberty is secured by heroes who have answered the call to 

serve when America needed them most. On Gold Star Mother’s Day, we 

honor the mothers of the service men and women who have given their 

lives in the defense of our great Nation. 

America’s Gold Star Mothers are remarkable patriots who serve their communities by demonstrating good citizenship, providing support and services 

to our troops and veterans, and helping comfort the families whose loved 

ones have made the ultimate sacrifice. Their sense of duty and deep devotion 

to our country inspire our Nation, and we thank them for their compassion, 

determination, and strength. Though they carry a great burden of grief, 

these courageous mothers help ensure that the legacy of our fallen heroes 

will be forever remembered. On this day, we offer our deep gratitude and 

respect to our Nation’s Gold Star Mothers; we honor the sons and daughters 

who died while wearing the uniform of the United States; and we pray 

for God’s blessings on them, their mothers, and their families. 

The Congress, by Senate Joint Resolution 115 of June 23, 1936 (49 Stat. 

1895 as amended), has designated the last Sunday in September as ‘‘Gold 

Star Mother’s Day’’ and has authorized and requested the President to issue 

a proclamation in its observance. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim Sunday, September 30, 2007, as Gold Star 

Mother’s Day. I call upon all Government officials to display the flag of 

the United States over Government buildings on this solemn day. I also 

encourage the American people to display the flag and hold appropriate 

ceremonies as a public expression of our Nation’s sympathy and respect 

for our Gold Star Mothers. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRD2
54812 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 26, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-first 

day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of 

the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and 

thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07–4768 

Filed 9–25–07; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRD2GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
EXHIBIT 31



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Edward L. Stern, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Kreisler Manufacturing Corporation certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Kreisler Manufacturing
Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) [Intentionally Omitted];



c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and;



d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and;



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|/s/    Edward L. Stern, |  | Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer |  | Date: November 11, 2003
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           19714
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   531800
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1712
<INVENTORY>                                      31072
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                834613
<PP&E>                                         6151253
<DEPRECIATION>                                  371672
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8848933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1131474
<BONDS>                                        3293168
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        566462
<OTHER-SE>                                     1150217
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8848933
<SALES>                                         480512
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                480512
<CGS>                                           276577
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   366116
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   255
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               60399
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  76811
<INCOME-TAX>                                     30727
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              46084
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     46084
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------- -X 

MERVYN FRANKEL, 

Plaint iff, 

- against - PI;'4z7KfM AND 

ORDER 

not ECF cases 

NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMEIdT OF 

ENVIRONMENTAL FKOTECTION, et dl., 

DOUGLAS F. EATON, United States Magistrate Jud e. gi I 

In a fax letter tc7 n:e dited January d, plalntlff said 

that he would be sending 

Accordingly, at the end of rn-1 1/17/~~ I set 

forth an amended briefing sched~le 

by March 7 and plaintiff's 

surprise, plaintiff 

motlon was four 

conference wlth amended the 

briefing schedule as follows : 

Any dispositive motions must be dir 

Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 

on February 13, 2008. Defendants' oppos 

cross-motion, if any) must be served and 

before March 14, 2008. Plaintiff's rep1 

opposition to any cross-motion) must be 

filed on or before March 31, 2008; Plain 

reply memorandum must contain no more pa 

50% of the number of pages in defendants 

memorandum; Plaintiff's memorandum oppos 

cross-motion must contain no more pages t 

the number of pages in defendantsf memora 

supporting the cross-motion. Defendants 

file any "surreply" as to plaintiff's mo 

however, if defendants have made a cross 

then they may serve reply papers (limited 

cross-motion) on or before April 14, 200 

reply memorandum must contain no more pa 

50% of the number of pages in plaintiff's 

Case 1:07-cv-03436-LTS Document 20 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 1 of 2
I now turn to Mr. Madden's February 25 lett 

Frankel's February 26. In essence, Mr. Frankel 

or seal those portions of his February 13 papera 

"personal information such as social security in 

can leave me open to identity theft." I direct 

send me a letter specifying each page and line 

information appears. Mr. Madden should use his 

avoid mention of such information (or to redact 

public filings and submit it to me in a side le 

I will hold the February 13 papers in my chambe 

make arrangements to redact (a) pages TO0 0 1 -TO0 

from Exhibit 3, and (b) the information specifi 

papers. I will then write a Report and 

to Judge Swain. 

Dated: New York, New York 

February 28, 2008 

Recornmendation 

DOUGL* F. EATON 

United States Ma i trate Judge 

500 Pearl Street, oom 1360 

New York, New Yo k 10007 

Telephone: (212) 8 5-6175 

Fax: (212) 805-618 : i 

Copies of this Memorandum and Order are being e t by mail to: 7 t 

Mervyn Frankel 

144-16 68 Drive 

Flushing, NY 11367 

(also by fax to 718-263-4564) 

Kevin A. Madden, Esq. 

New York City Law Department 

100 Church Street, Room 2-108 

New York, NY 10007 

(also by fax to 212-788-8877) 

Case 1:07-cv-03436-LTS Document 20 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03459-JFK Document 35 Filed 08/12/2008 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03459-JFK Document 35 Filed 08/12/2008 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03459-JFK Document 35 Filed 08/12/2008 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03459-JFK Document 35 Filed 08/12/2008 Page 4 of 4
## NUMBER 13 - 1 8 - 00 4 48 - CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ JOANN RIVERA , Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________ On A ppeal from the 148 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________ 

## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Valdez Appellant entered a plea of guilty to possession of a controlled substance. On June 14, 2016 t he trial court deferred adjudication of her guilt and placed her on community supervision. The appellant did not file a notice of appeal at that time, but2 instead brought this appeal of the trial court’s subsequent order of July 3, 2018 imposing
sanctions and increasing community supervision for a year

. We dismiss the appeal. The right to appeal is conferred by the legislature, and a party may appeal only that which the legislature has authorized. Marin v. State , 851 S.W.2d 275, 278 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993). A defendant has a right to appeal when his community supervision is revoked and he is adjudicated guilty and sentenced. See T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. art. 42.12, § 23(b) . To the contrary, t here is no statutory basis for an appeal of an order modifyin g a term or condition of probation. See Christopher v. State , 7 S.W.3d 224, 225 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. ref’d). Case law has long held that an order modifying or refusing to modify probation is not subject to appeal. See Basaldua v. St ate , 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977); Perez v. State , 938 S.W.2d 761, 762

- 63 (Tex. App.

— Austin 1997, pet. ref’d); Eaden v. State 901 S.W.2d 535, 536 (Tex. App.

— El Paso 1995, no pet.). In this case, the record does not contain any order revoking Riv era’s community supervision, adjudicating h er guilt, or assessing a jail or prison sentence. Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the order from which the appeal was taken was not an appealable or der and requested correction of this defect within ten days or the appeal would be dismissed. On August 31, 2018, counsel filed a
letter brief with this Court concluding this Court lacks jurisdiction. The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, i s of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a).3 /s/ Rogelio Valdez ROGELIO VALDEZ Chief Justice

Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 27th day of September, 2018.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 D0 33 1 . W I LHY HARPO v . MORDENA BOLT.

On M arch 2 3

, 2 0 15

, W i l h y Harp o fi l ed t h i s ap p l i cat io n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal

fro m a st at e co u rt ord er d i s m i s s i n g h i s de n o vo ap peal i n t hi s d i s p o s s es so ry cas e. 1 W e

l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

Harp o ’ s ap p l i cat i o n s t at es t h at h e i s ap p eal i n g fro m an o rd er “ fi l ed an d en t ered

o n Feb ru ary 6

, 2 0 1 5 wh i ch d is m i s s ed Harp o ’ s s ai d d irect d e n o v o ap p eal .” Harp o

i n cl u d ed a co p y o f t he t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er, s ig ned o n Feb ru ary 6

, bu t it was n o t a

s t am p ed “ fi l ed ” co p y as req ui red b y Co urt o f Ap p eal s Ru l e 3 1 (e). A s tam ped “ fi l ed ”

co p y i s req u i red i n o rd er fo r t h i s C o u rt t o as cert ai n th at t he ap p l icat i o n was fi l ed

wi t h i n s ev en d ay s

, w h ich i s a ju ri s d i ct i o n al p rereq u i s i t e. OCGA § 4 4-7 -5 6 ; Ra y M.

W r ig h t

, In c. v. Jo n es

, 2 3 9 Ga. Ap p

. 5 2 1 (5 2 1 SE2 d 4 5 6 ) (1 99 9 ). On M arch 25

, 2 0 1 5

t h i s Co u rt o rd ered Harp o t o s u p p l em en t hi s ap p l i cat i o n wi t h i n 1 0 d ay s wi t h a s t am p ed

“ fi l ed ” co p y o f t h e o rd er t o b e ap p eal ed

. W e n ot ed t h at fai l u re t o co m p ly w i t h t h i s

d i rect i v e wo u l d res ul t i n d i s m i s s al o f t h e ap p l i cat i o n

. M o re t han 1 0 d ay s hav e p as s ed

s i n c e w e i s s u ed t he March 2 5

, 2 0 15 ord er, b u t Harp o h as n o t su b m i tt ed a s t am p ed

“ fi l ed ” co p y o f t h e t r i a l c o u rt ’ s o rd er. Acco rd i n g l y

, h i s ap p l i cat i o n i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

1 W e n o t e t h at t h e t ri al co urt ap p aren t ly h as l i s t ed th e ap p el lee a s M o rd en a

B o l t

, M o rd en a Bel t an d M o rd en a Bo l d en o n v ari o u s co urt ord ers an d i t s ca s e

s u m m ary d o ck et s h eet

. April 17, 2015C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 04/17/2015
#### STATE v. SHAW

No. 79 PC.

Case below: 53 N.C. App. 772.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 December 1981.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

# AGENCY:

National Archives and Records Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) announces a meeting of the Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress. The committee advises NARA on the full range of programs, policies, and plans for the Center for Legislative Archives in the Office of Records Services.

# DATES:

November 30, 2005 from 10 a.m. to 11 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

National Archives and Records Administration Building, Archivist's Board Room (Room 119), Washington, DC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Richard H. Hunt, Director; Center for Legislative Archives; (202) 501-5350.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Agenda

Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress Fourth Report Symposium on Presidential and Public Papers at the John Brademas Center for the Study of Congress 

Activities Report of the Center for Legislative Archives 

Other current issues and new business 

The meeting is open to the public.

This notice is published less than 15 calendar days before the meeting because of scheduling difficulties.

Dated: November 18, 2005.

Mary Ann Hadyka,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-23205 Filed 11-21-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EAST EL PASO PHYSICIANS 

MEDICAL CENTER, L.L.C..,

 Appellant,

v.

OLIVIA VARGAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-13-00358-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2011-DCV00117)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment and all 

costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Larsen, J. (Senior Judge)

Larsen, J. (Senior Judge, sitting by assignment)
exv10w40






Exhibit 10.40




Fiscal Year 2010 Key Management Bonus Program




The Compensation Committee (“Compensation Committee”) of the Board of Directors (“Board”) approved
a cash bonus plan for fiscal year 2010 (the “2010 Key Management Bonus Program”) pursuant to which
certain key management personnel of the Company will participate, including Sydney Franchuk and Roy
Hibberd, who are each named executive officers of the Company. The 2010 Key Management Bonus
Program sets forth target bonus amounts as a percentage of base compensation, which are measured
based upon the achievement of certain earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (“EBITDA”) goals of the overall company and of the performance of the business unit in
which each participant operates, and/or achievement of Strategic Objectives established by the
Board. As for Mr. Franchuk, his percentage is measured based upon the performance of National Money
Mart Company, which is the business unit in which he operates. As for Mr. Hibberd, his percentage
is measured based upon the performance of the overall Company.



The target bonus award and maximum bonus award for Mr. Franchuk pursuant to the 2010 Key
Management Bonus Program are 60% and 120%, respectively. The target bonus award and maximum bonus
award for Mr. Hibberd pursuant to the 2010 Key Management Bonus Program are 45% and 90%,
respectively.



The Compensation Committee and/or the Board will determine the EBITDA operating targets and
methodology on which the bonuses are paid pursuant to the 2010 Key Management Bonus Program based
upon methods used historically by the Company. The Compensation Committee and/or the Board retain
the right to amend, alter or terminate the 2010 Key Management Bonus Program at any time. The
bonuses under the 2010 Key Management Bonus Program will be calculated and paid after finalizing
the Company’s audited annual financial results for fiscal year 2010. Each employee must be
employed in good standing on date of payment in order to receive payment under the arrangement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS LEGEND  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE
CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COYOTE NETWORKS SYSTEMS, INC. AS
OF AND FOR THE  QUARTER  ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30,  1999,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                1036
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        19969
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (522)
<INVENTORY>                                           2392
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     24775
<PP&E>                                                9691
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (2751)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       44188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                27975
<BONDS>                                               1464
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                           6000
<COMMON>                                             13678
<OTHER-SE>                                           (3191)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         44188
<SALES>                                               7518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      7518
<CGS>                                                 6384
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         6384
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      6538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     482
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        397
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    401
<DISCONTINUED>                                          (4)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           397
<EPS-BASIC>                                          .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .03


</TABLE>
#### INDUSTRIES, INC. v. CONSTRUCTION CO.

No. 3 PC.

Case below: 42 N.C. App. 259.

Petition by additional defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 25 September 1979.