Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 189 / Monday, October 1, 2007 / Notices 55833 

Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration, 

Houston, TX 77058–3696 

Location 6 

John F. Kennedy Space Center, National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration, 

Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899–0001 

Location 7 

Langley Research Center, National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration, 

Hampton, VA 23681–2199 

Location 8 

John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis 

Field, National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration, 21000 Brookpark Road, 

Cleveland, OH 44135–3191 

Location 9 

George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, 

National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration, Marshall Space Flight 

Center, AL 35812–0001 

Location 10 

HQ NASA Management Office-JPL, 

National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, 

Pasadena, CA 91109–8099 

Location 11 

John C. Stennis Space Center, National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration, 

Stennis Space Center, MS 39529–6000 

Location 12 

JSC White Sands Test Facility, National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration, 

P.O. Drawer MM, Las Cruces, NM 

88004–0020 

Location 13 

GRC Plum Brook Station, National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration, 

Sandusky, OH 44870 

Location 14 

MSFC Michoud Assembly Facility, 

National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration, P.O. Box 29300, New 

Orleans, LA 70189 

Location 15 

NASA Independent Verification and 

Validation Facility (NASA IV&V), 100 

University Drive, Fairmont, WV 26554 

Location 16 

Edison Post of Duty, c/o DCIS, P.O. 1054, 

Edison, NJ 08818 

Location 17 

Western Field Office, Glenn Anderson 

Federal Building, 501 West Ocean Blvd., 

Long Beach, CA 90802–4222 

Location 18 

NASA Shared Services Center (NSSC), 

Building 5100, Stennis Space Center, MS 

39529–6000 

Appendix B—Standard Routine Uses—

NASA 

The following routine uses of information 

contained in SORs, subject to the Privacy Act 

of 1974, are standard for many NASA 

systems. They are cited by reference in the 

paragraph ‘‘Routine uses of records 

maintained in the system, including 

categories of users and the purpose of such 

uses’’ of the Federal Register Notice on those 

systems to which they apply. 

Standard Routine Use No. 1—LAW 

ENFORCEMENT—In the event this system of 

records indicates a violation or potential 

violation of law, whether civil, criminal, or 

regulatory in nature, and whether arising by 

general statute or particular program statute, 

or by regulation, rule or order issued 

pursuant thereto, the relevant records in the 

SOR may be referred, as a routine use, to the 

appropriate agency, whether Federal, State, 

local or foreign, charged with the 

responsibility of investigating or prosecuting 

such violation or charged with enforcing or 

implementing the statute, or rule, regulation 

or order issued pursuant thereto. 

Standard Routine Use No. 2—

DISCLOSURE OF REQUESTED 

INFORMATION—A record from this SOR 

may be disclosed as a ‘‘routine use’’ to a 

Federal, State, or local agency maintaining 

civil, criminal, or other relevant enforcement 

information or other pertinent information, 

such as current licenses, if necessary to 

obtain information relevant to an agency 

decision concerning the hiring or retention of 

an employee, the issuance of a security 

clearance, the letting of a contract, or the 

issuance of a license, grant, or other benefit. 

Standard Routine Use No. 3—

DISCLOSURE OF REQUESTED 

INFORMATION—A record from this SOR 

may be disclosed to a Federal agency, in 

response to its request, in connection with 

the hiring or retention of an employee, the 

issuance of a security clearance, the reporting 

of an investigation of an employee, the letting 

of a contract, or the issuance of a license, 

grant, or other benefit by the requesting 

agency, to the extent that the information is 

relevant and necessary to the requesting 

agency’s decision on the matter. 

Standard Routine Use No. 4—

DISCLOSURE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE FOR USE IN LITIGATION: 

It shall be a routine use of the records in 

this system of records to disclose them to the 

Department of Justice when (a) The Agency, 

or any component thereof; or (b) any 

employee of the Agency in his or her official 

capacity; or (c) any employee of the Agency 

in his or her individual capacity where the 

Department of Justice or the Agency has 

agreed to represent the employee; or (d) the 

United States, where the Agency determines 

that litigation is likely to affect the Agency 

or any of its components, is a party to 

litigation or has an interest in such litigation, 

and the use of such records by the 

Department of Justice or the Agency is 

deemed by the Agency to be relevant and 

necessary to the litigation provided, however, 

that in each case it has been determined that 

the disclosure is compatible with the purpose 

for which the records were collected. 

Standard Routine Use No. 5—ROUTINE 

USE FOR AGENCY DISCLOSURE IN 

LITIGATION—It shall be a routine use of the 

records in this system of records to disclose 

them in a proceeding before a court or 

adjudicative body before which the agency is 

authorized to appear, when: (a) The Agency, 

or any component thereof; or (b) any 

employee of the Agency in his or her official 

capacity; or (c) any employee of the Agency 

in his or her individual capacity where the 

Agency has agreed to represent the employee; 

or (d) the United States, where the Agency 

determines that litigation is likely to affect 

the Agency or any of its components, is a 

party to litigation or has an interest in such 

litigation, and the use of such records by the 

Agency is deemed to be relevant and 

necessary to the litigation, provided, 

however, that in each case, the Agency has 

determined that the disclosure is compatible 

with the purpose for which the records were 

collected. 

Standard Routine Use No. 6—SUSPECTED 

OR CONFIRMED CONFIDENTIALITY 

COMPROMISE—A record from this SOR may 

be disclosed to appropriate agencies, entities, 

and persons when (1) NASA suspects or has 

confirmed that the security or confidentiality 

of information in the system of records has 

been compromised; (2) NASA has 

determined that as a result of the suspected 

or confirmed compromise there is a risk of 

harm to economic or property interests, 

identity theft or fraud, or harm to the security 

or integrity of this system or other systems 

or programs (whether maintained by NASA 

or another agency or entity) that rely upon 

the compromised information; and (3) the 

disclosure made to such agencies, entities, 

and persons is reasonably necessary to assist 

in connection with NASA’s efforts to respond 

to the suspected or confirmed compromise 

and prevent, minimize, or remedy such 

harm. 

[FR Doc. E7–19278 Filed 9–28–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510–13–P 

OFFICE OF NAVAJO AND HOPI INDIAN 

RELOCATION 

Performance Review Board and 

Membership 

AGENCY: Office of Navajo and Hopi 

Indian Relocation. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the 

appointments of members to a 

performance review board for the Office 

of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael J. McAlister, Deputy Director, 

Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian 

Relocation, 201 E. Birch Ave., Room 11, 

Flagstaff, AZ 86001, Telephone (928) 

779–2721. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

4314(c) of Title 5, U.S.C., requires each 

agency to establish, in accordance with 

regulations, one or more Senior 

Executive Service (SES) performance 

review boards. The function of the 

boards is to review and evaluate the 

initial appraisal of senior executives’

performance and make 

recommendations to the appointing 

authority relative to the performance of 

these executives. Because of its small 

size, the Office of Navajo and Hopi 

Indian Relocation has appointed SES 

appointees from other Federal agencies 

to serve on its performance review 

board. The members of the performance 

review board for the Office of Navajo 

and Hopi Indian Relocation are: 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

55834 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 189 / Monday, October 1, 2007 / Notices 

1 If the request/petition is filed by e-mail or 

facsimile, an original and two copies of the 

document must be mailed within 2 (two) business 

days thereafter to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–

0001, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications 

Staff. 

Ronald Linz, Deputy Director, International 

Broadcasting Bureau. 

John Farrell, Executive Director, U.S. Arctic 

Research Commission. 

Ernest Garcia, Deputy Director, Selective 

Service System. 

Dated: September 24, 2007. 

Michael J. McAlister, 

Deputy Director, Office of Navajo and Hopi 

Indian Relocation. 

[FR Doc. 07–4802 Filed 9–28–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7560–01–M 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., 

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 

Nos. 2 and 3; Notice of Opportunity for 

Hearing Regarding Renewal of Facility 

Operating License Nos. DPR–26 and 

DPR–64 for an Additional 20-Year 

Period: Extension of Time for Filing of 

Requests for Hearing or Petitions for 

Leave To Intervene in the License 

Renewal Proceeding 

AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: License renewal: Extension of 

time for the filing of requests for hearing 

or petitions for leave to intervene in the 

license renewal proceeding. 

SUMMARY: On August 1, 2007 (72 FR 

42134), the Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) announced its 

acceptance for docketing of the 

application and notice of opportunity 

for hearing for the renewal of Operating 

License Nos. DPR–26 and DPR–64, 

which authorize Entergy Nuclear 

Operations, Inc. to operate Indian Point 

Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, 

respectively, at 3216 megawatts thermal 

(MWt) for each unit. A sixty-day period 

was provided for the filing of written 

requests for a hearing or petitions for 

leave to intervene with respect to the 

renewal of the license. The period for 

the filing of requests for a hearing or 

petitions for leave to intervene was to 

have expired on October 1, 2007. 

The period for the filing of requests 

for a hearing or petitions for leave to 

intervene has been extended and now 

expires on November 30, 2007. The 

period for filling answers to such 

requests or petitions has also been 

extended. 

DATES: The period for the filing of 

requests for a hearing or petitions for 

leave to intervene has been extended 

and now expires on November 30, 2007. 

Answers to such requests or petitions 

are now due on January 11, 2008, and 

replies to those answers are due on 

January 18, 2008 (see 10 CFR 2.309(h)). 

Non-timely requests and/or petitions 

and contentions will not be entertained 

absent a determination of the 

Commission, the presiding officer, or 

the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 

that the petition, request and/or 

contentions should be granted based on 

a balancing of the factors specified in 10 

CFR 2.309(a)(1)(i)–(viii). 

ADDRESSES: A request for a hearing or a 

petition for leave to intervene must be 

filed by: (1) First class mail addressed 

to the Office of the Secretary of the 

Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Washington, DC 20555–

0001, Attention: Rulemaking and 

Adjudications Staff; (2) Courier, express 

mail, and expedited delivery services to 

the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth 

Floor, One White Flint North, 11555 

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 

20852, Attention: Rulemaking and 

Adjudications Staff; (3) E-mail 

addressed to the Office of the Secretary, 

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

HEARINGDOCKET@NRC.GOV; or (4) 

facsimile transmission addressed to the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, 

DC, Attention: Rulemaking and 

Adjudications Staff at 301–415–1101 

(verification number: 301–415–1966).1

A copy of the request for hearing or 

petition for leave to intervene must also 

be sent to the Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Washington, DC 20555–

0001, and it is requested that copies be 

transmitted either by means of facsimile 

transmission to 301–415–3725 or by email to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov. A copy 

of the request for hearing or petition for 

leave to intervene should also be sent to 

the Assistant General Counsel, Entergy 

Nuclear Operations, Inc., 440 Hamilton 

Avenue, White Plains, NY 10601. 

Detailed information about the license 

renewal process can be found under the 

Nuclear Reactors icon at http:// 

www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ 

licensing/renewal.html on the NRC’s 

Web site. Copies of the application to 

renew the operating licenses for Indian 

Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 

and 3 are available for public inspection 

at the Commission’s Public Document 

Room (PDR), located at One White Flint 

North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), 

Rockville, Maryland 20852–2738. The 

same documents may also be viewed 

and downloaded electronically via the 

applications Web site, http:// 

www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ 

licensing/renewal/applications.html, 

while the application is under review. 

The application may be accessed in 

ADAMS through the NRC’s Public 

Electronic Reading Room on the Internet 

at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ 

adams.html under ADAMS Accession 

Numbers ML071210507, ML071280700, 

and ML071800318. Persons who do not 

have access to ADAMS or who 

encounter problems in accessing the 

documents located in ADAMS may 

contact the NRC PDR Reference staff at 

1–800–397–4209 or 301–415–4737 or by 

e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov. 

The NRC staff has verified that a copy 

of the license renewal application is 

also available to local residents near 

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 

Nos. 2 and 3 at the White Plains Public 

Library, 100 Martine Avenue, White 

Plains, NY 10601; the Field Library, 4 

Nelson Avenue, Peekskill, NY 10566; 

and the Hendrick Hudson Free Library, 

185 Kings Ferry Road, Montrose, NY 

10548. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day 

of September 2007. 

For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

Annette L. Vietti-Cook, 

Secretary of the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–19311 Filed 9–28–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. 40–8838–MLA; ASLBP No. 00–

776–04–MLA] 

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; in 

the Matter of: U.S. Army (Jefferson 

Proving Ground Site); Notice of 

Hearing (Application for a License 

Amendment) 

September 20, 2007. 

Before Administrative Judges: Alan S. 

Rosenthal, Chairman; Dr. Paul B. 

Abramson, Dr. Richard F. Cole. 

This Atomic Safety and Licensing 

Board hereby gives notice that, pursuant 

to 10 CFR Part 2, Subpart L, it will 

convene an evidentiary hearing on 

October 22, 2007 to receive testimony 

and exhibits concerning the adequacy of 

the Field Sampling Plan (FSP) in the 

application submitted by the 

Department of the Army (Licensee) for 

an amendment to its NRC materials 

license (License No. SUB–1435) for an 

alternate decommissioning schedule. 

See 10 CFR 40.42(g)(2). 

Between 1983 and 1994, under the 

auspices of that license, the Licensee 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES