Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 232 / Monday, December 5, 2005 / Notices 72503 

Specifications for Screening Devices to 

Measure Alcohol in Bodily Fluids (59 

FR 39382). These specifications 

established performance criteria and 

methods for testing alcohol screening 

devices to measure alcohol content. The 

specifications support State laws that 

target youthful offenders (e.g., ‘‘zero 

tolerance’’ laws) and the Department of 

Transportation’s workplace alcohol 

testing program. NHTSA published its 

first Conforming Products List (CPL) for 

screening devices on December 2, 1994 

(59 FR 61923, with corrections on 

December 16, 1994 in 59 FR 65128), 

identifying the devices that meet 

NHTSA’s Model Specifications for 

Screening Devices to Measure Alcohol 

in Bodily Fluids. Five (5) devices 

appeared on that first list. Thereafter, 

NHTSA amended the CPL on August 15, 

1995 (60 FR 42214) and on May 4, 2001 

(66 FR 22639), adding seven (7) devices 

to the CPL in those two (2) actions. 

On September 19, 2005, NHTSA 

published an updated CPL (70 FR 

54972), adding several devices to the list 

and removing several other devices. 

Since that publication of the CPL, 

NHTSA discovered an error regarding 

the name of the device listed on the CPL 

for the manufacturer Varian, Inc. This 

Notice serves to correct the error by 

republishing the CPL in its entirety with 

the accurate name of the device. 

The Notice published on September 

19, 2005 explained that Varian, Inc. of 

Lake Forest, California acquired the 

‘‘On-Site Alcohol’’ saliva-alcohol 

screening device previously owned by 

Roche Diagnostics Systems. Varian, Inc. 

certified that the ‘‘On-Site Alcohol’’

device it sells is identical to the device 

previously sold by Roche. The Roche 

Diagnostics device was removed from 

the CPL because none of the Roche 

devices exist in the marketplace. 

However, NHTSA intended to list on 

the CPL the Varian, Inc. ‘‘On-Site 

Alcohol’’ saliva-alcohol screening 

device but instead listed the ‘‘Q.E.D. 

A150 Saliva Alcohol Test.’’

Accordingly, NHTSA amends the CPL 

to correct this error. The CPL is 

reprinted in its entirety below. 

CONFORMING PRODUCTS LIST OF ALCOHOL SCREENING DEVICES

Manufacturer Device(s) 

AK Solutions, Inc., Palisades Park, NJ 1 .................................................. Alcoscan AL–2500, AlcoChecker, AlcoKey, AlcoMate, AlcoMate Pro, 

Alcoscan AL–5000, Alcoscan AL–6000. 

Alco Check International, Hudsonville, MI ............................................... Alco Check 3000 D.O.T., Alco Check 9000. 

Chematics, Inc., North Webster, IN ......................................................... ALCO–SCREEN 02TM 2

Guth Laboratories, Inc., Harrisburg, PA ................................................... Alco Tector Mark X, Mark X Alcohol Checker, Alcotector WAT89EC–1. 

Han International Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea 3 .............................................. A.B.I. (Alcohol Breath Indicator). 

OraSure Technologies, Inc., Bethlehem, PA ........................................... Q.E.D. A150 Saliva Alcohol Test. 

PAS Systems International, Inc., Fredericksburg, VA ............................. PAS Vr. 

Q3 Innovations, Inc., Independence, IA4 ................................................. Alcohawk Precision, Alcohawk Elite, Alcohawk ABI, Alcohawk 

PRO. 

Repco Marketing, Inc., Raleigh, NC ......................................................... Alco Tec III. 

Seju Co. of Taejeon, Korea ...................................................................... Safe-Slim. 

Sound Off, Inc., Hudsonville, MI .............................................................. Digitox D.O.T. 

Varian, Inc., Lake Forest, CA ................................................................... On-Site Alcohol 5

1The AlcoMate was manufactured by Han International of Seoul, Korea, but marketed and sold in the U.S. by AK Solutions. 

2While the ALCO–SCREEN 02TM saliva-alcohol screening device manufactured by Chematics, Inc. passed the requirements of the Model 

Specifications when tested at 40 °C (104 °F), the manufacturer has indicated that the device cannot exceed storage temperatures of 27 °C (80 

°F). Instructions to this effect are stated on all packaging accompanying the device. Accordingly, the device should not be stored at temperatures 

above 27 °C (80 °F). If the device is stored at or below 27 °C (80 °F) and used at higher temperatures (i.e., within a minute), the device meets 

the Model Specifications and the results persist for 10–15 minutes. If the device is stored at or below 27 °C (80 °F) and equilibrated at 40 °C 

(104 °F) for an hour prior to sample application, the device fails to meet the Model Specifications. Storage at temperatures above 27 °C (80 °F), 

for even brief periods of time, may result in false negative readings. 3 Han International does not market or sell devices directly in the U.S. market. Other devices manufactured by Han International are listed 

under AK Solutions, Inc. and Q–3 Innovations, Inc. 4The AlcoHawk ABI is the same device as that listed under Han International as the ‘‘ABI’’ and is manufactured for Q–3 Innovations by Han 

International. The Alcohawk PRO is the same device as the AlcoMate marketed and sold by AK Solutions, and also manufactured by Han International. 5While this device passed all of the requirements of the Model Specifications, readings should be taken only after the time specified by the 

manufacturer. For valid readings, the user should follow the manufacturer’s instructions. Readings should be taken one (1) minute after a sample 

is introduced at or above 30 °C (86 °F); readings should be taken after two (2) minutes at 18 °C–29 °C (64.4 °F–84.2 °F); and readings should 

be taken after five (5) minutes when testing at temperatures at or below 17 °C (62.6 °F). If the reading is taken before five (5) minutes has 

elapsed under the cold conditions, the user is likely to obtain a reading that underestimates the actual saliva-alcohol level. 

The devices manufactured by 

Chematics, Inc., OraSure Technologies, 

Inc., and Varian, Inc. are all single-use, 

disposable saliva alcohol test devices. 

All of the other devices listed on the 

CPL are electronic breath testers. The 

device called the ‘‘Alcotector 

WAT89EC–1’’ manufacturered by Guth 

Laboratories, Inc. and the PAS Vr device 

manufactured by PAS Systems 

International, Inc. use fuel-cell sensors, 

whereas all other electronic devices 

listed on the CPL use semi-conductor 

sensors. 

Marilena Amoni, 

Associate Administrator for Program 

Development and Delivery. 

[FR Doc. E5–6848 Filed 12–2–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–59–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials 

Safety Administration 

Office of Hazardous Materials Safety; 

Notice of Delays in Processing of 

Special Permit Applications 

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous 

Materials Safety Administration, DOT. 

ACTION: List of application delayed more 

than 180 days. 

72504 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 232 / Monday, December 5, 2005 / Notices 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5117(c), 

PHMSA is publishing the following list 

of special permit applications that have 

been in process for 180 days or more. 

The reason(s) for delay and the expected 

completion date for action on each 

application is provided in association 

with each identified applications. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann 

Mazzullo, Office of Hazardous Materials 

Special Permits and Approvals, Pipeline 

and Hazardous Materials Safety 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, 

SW., Washington, DC 20590–0001, (202) 

366–4535. 

Key to ‘‘Reason for Delay’’

1. Awaiting additional information 

from applicant 

2. Extensive public comment under 

review 

3. Application is technically complex 

and is of significant impact or 

precedent-setting and requires 

extensive analysis 

4. Staff review delayed by other 

priority issues or volume of special 

permit applications 

Meaning of Application Number 

Suffixes 

N—New application 

M—Modification request 

X—Renewal 

PM—Party to application with 

modification request 

Issued in Washington, DC, on November 

29, 2005. 

R. Ryan Posten, 

Chief, Special Permits Program, Office of 

Hazardous Materials Safety Speceial Permits 

& Approvals. 

Application No. Applicant Reason for 

delay 

Estimated date 

of completion 

NEW SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATIONS 

13281–N ........... The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI .............................................................................. 4 01–31–2006 

13266–N ........... Luxfer Gas Cylinders, Riverside, CA ........................................................................................ 4 01–31–2006 

13309–N ........... OPW Engineered Systems, Lebanon, OH ............................................................................... 4 01–31–2006 

13341–N ........... National Propane Gas Association, Washington, DC .............................................................. 3 01–31–2006 

13347–N ........... ShipMate, Inc., Torrance, CA ................................................................................................... 4 01–31–2006 

13302–N ........... FIBA Technologies, Inc., Westboro, MA .................................................................................. 4 01–31–2006 

13314–N ........... Sunoco Inc., Philadelphia, PA .................................................................................................. 4 01–31–2006 

13346–N ........... Stand-By-Systems, Inc., Dallas, TX ......................................................................................... 1 01–31–2006 

13547–N ........... CP Industries, McKeesport, PA ................................................................................................ 4 01–31–2006 

14175–N ........... Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., Allentown, PA ........................................................................ 4 01–31–2006 

14167–N ........... Trinityrail, Dallas, TX ................................................................................................................ 4 01–31–2006 

14163–N ........... Air Liquide America L.P., Houston, TX .................................................................................... 4 01–31–2006 

14162–N ........... BSCO Incorporated, Forest Hills, MD ...................................................................................... 4 01–31–2006 

14151–N ........... ChevronTexaco, Houston, TX .................................................................................................. 4 01–31–2006 

14141–N ........... Nalco Company, Naperville, IL ................................................................................................. 4 01–31–2006 

14138–N ........... INO Therapeutics, Inc., Port Allen, LA ..................................................................................... 4 01–31–2006 

14038–N ........... Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI ..................................................................................... 1 01–31–2006 

13999–N ........... Kompozit-Praha s.r.o., Dysina u Plzne, Czech Republic, CZ .................................................. 4 01–31–2006 

14218–N ........... Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc., Fairbanks, AK ............................................................................. 4 01–31–2006 

14205–N ........... The Clorox Company, Pleasanton, CA .................................................................................... 4 02–28–2006 

14197–N ........... GATX Rail Corporation, Chicago, IL ........................................................................................ 4 02–28–2006 

14199–N ........... RACCA, Plymouth, MA ............................................................................................................. 4 02–28–2006 

14190–N ........... Cordis Corporation, Miami Lakes, FL ....................................................................................... 4 01–31–2006 

14189–N ........... PPG Industries, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA ........................................................................................ 4 01–31–2006 

14185–N ........... U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC .......................................................................... 4 01–31–2006 

14184–N ........... Global Refrigerants, Inc., Denver, CO ..................................................................................... 4 01–31–2006 

14178–N ........... Brider Fire Inc., Bozeman, MT ................................................................................................. 4 01–31–2006 

13957–N ........... T.L.C.C.I., Inc., Franklin, TN ..................................................................................................... 4 12–31–2005 

13582–N ........... Linde Gas LLC (Linde), Independence, OH ............................................................................. 4 01–31–2006 

13563–N ........... Applied Companies, Valencia, CA ........................................................................................... 4 01–31–2006 

MODIFICATION TO SPECIAL PERMITS 

7277–M ............. Structural Composites Industries, Pomona, CA ....................................................................... 4 12–31–2005 

10019–M ........... Structural Composites Industries, Pomona, CA ....................................................................... 4 12–31–2005 

10878–M ........... Tankcon FRP Inc., Boisbriand, Qc ........................................................................................... 1, 3 12–31–2005 

11241–M ........... Rohm and Haas Co., Philadelphia, PA .................................................................................... 1 12–31–2005 

12284–M ........... The American Traffic Safety Services Assn. (ATSSA), Fredericksburg, VA ........................... 1 12–31–2005 

11321–M ........... E.I. Du Pont, Wilmington, DE ................................................................................................... 4 12–31–2005 

12412–M ........... Los Angeles Chemical Company, South Gate, CA ................................................................. 4 01–31–2006 

12412–M ........... Hawkins, Inc., Minneapolis, MN ............................................................................................... 3, 4 01–31–2006 

11903–M ........... Comptank Corporation, Bothwell, ON ...................................................................................... 4 12–31–2005 

13229–M ........... Matheson Tri-Gas, East Rutherford, NJ ................................................................................... 4 12–31–2005 

9659–M ............. Kaiser Compositek Inc., Brea, CA ............................................................................................ 4 12–31–2005 

13327–M ........... Hawk FRP LLC, Ardmore, OK ................................................................................................. 1 12–31–2005 

13488–M ........... FABER INDUSTRIES SPA (U.S. Agent: Kaplan Industries, Maple Shade, NJ) ..................... 4 12–31–2005 

10319–M ........... Amtrol, Inc., West Warwick, RI ................................................................................................. 4 12–31–2005 

6263–M ............. Amtrol, Inc., West Warwick, RI ................................................................................................. 4 12–31–2005 

11579–M ........... Dyno Nobel, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT ....................................................................................... 4 12–31–2005 

10915–M ........... Luxfer Gas Cylinders (Composite Cylinder Division), Riverside, CA ....................................... 1 12–31–2005 

7280–M ............. Department of Defense, Ft. Eustis, VA .................................................................................... 4 12–31–2005 

8162–M ............. Structural Composites Industries, Pomona, CA ....................................................................... 4 12–31–2005 

8718–M ............. Structural Composites Industries, Pomona, CA ....................................................................... 4 12–31–2005 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 232 / Monday, December 5, 2005 / Notices 72505 

Application No. Applicant Reason for 

delay 

Estimated date 

of completion 

RENEWAL TO SPECIAL PERMITS 

9649–X ............. U.S. Department of Defense, Fort Eustis, VA .......................................................................... 1 12–31–2005 

[FR Doc. 05–23638 Filed 12–2–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–60–M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials 

Safety Administration 

[Docket No. RSPA–04–19914; Grant 2] 

Pipeline Safety: Grant of Waiver; 

Enstar Natural Gas Company 

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous 

Materials Safety Administration 

(PHMSA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice; grant of waiver. 

SUMMARY: Enstar Natural Gas Company 

(Enstar) petitioned PHMSA for a waiver 

of the pipeline safety regulation that 

prohibits tracer wire from being 

wrapped around the pipe. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

The pipeline safety regulation at 49 

CFR 192.321(e), Installation of plastic 

pipe, requires plastic pipe that is not 

encased to have an electric conducting 

wire or other means of locating the pipe 

while it is underground. Tracer wire 

may not be wrapped around the pipe 

and contact with the pipe must be 

minimized but is not prohibited. Tracer 

wire or other metallic elements installed 

for pipe locating purposes must be 

resistant to corrosion damage, either by 

use of coated copper wire or by other 

means. Enstar requested a waiver from 

§ 192.321(e) because it is uncommon for 

lightning strikes to occur in the service 

area of its pipeline. Enstar contends 

wrapping tracer wire around its plastic 

pipe allows utilities to be accurately 

located and thus reduces the risk of 

third-party damage to its pipeline. 

In support of its waiver request, 

Enstar provided information from the 

Bureau of Land Management (BLM) who 

is responsible for tracking lightning 

strike occurrences and monitoring forest 

fire activity. BLM determined that 

lightning strikes are most frequent north 

and west of the Alaska Range. 

Accordingly, BLM installed lightning 

detection systems with electrical 

sensors at nine stations in Alaska where 

lightning strikes are most common. BLM 

did not install electrical sensors to the 

south and east of the Alaska Range 

where Enstar facilities are located, 

because it determined lightning strikes 

are uncommon in those areas. 

Enstar’s service area is located in 

south central Alaska. Because of the 

unique geographical and climatic 

conditions of Enstar’s pipeline, Enstar 

has been able to demonstrate that in 32 

years, it has recorded only one 

confirmed pipeline incident due to 

lightning strikes. 

On April 6, 2005, PHMSA published 

a notice in Federal Register seeking 

public comment on Enstar’s waiver 

request (70 FR 17509); no comments 

were received. 

Grant of Waiver 

Based on the information presented 

by Enstar showing that lightning strikes 

are rare in the service area of its 

pipeline, PHMSA finds that granting 

this waiver request is not inconsistent 

with pipeline safety. Therefore, Enstar’s 

request for waiver from the regulatory 

requirements of § 192.321(e) is granted. 

If, however, PHMSA determines the 

terms of this waiver are no longer 

appropriate or the overall effect of the 

waiver is inconsistent with pipeline 

safety, PHMSA may revoke this waiver 

and require Enstar to comply with the 

regulatory requirements of § 192.321(e). 

This waiver is granted on the 

condition that Enstar: 

• Apply this waiver only to its 

pipeline facilities located south of the 

Alaska Range in the state of Alaska; 

• Protect its pipelines from ground 

faults—in particular, those pipelines 

that may be located in an electric power 

corridor; and 

• Place tracer wire in proximity to, 

but not in direct contact with, its 

pipeline whenever and where possible. 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60118(c) and 49 CFR 

1.53. 

Issued in Washington, DC on November 28, 

2005. 

Joy Kadnar, 

Acting Deputy Associate Administrator for 

Pipeline Safety. 

[FR Doc. 05–23641 Filed 12–2–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–60–P 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS 

[OMB Control No. 2900–0613] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities Under OMB Review 

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits 

Administration, Department of Veterans 

Affairs. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 

(44 U.S.C. 3501–3521), this notice 

announces that the Veterans Benefits 

Administration (VBA), Department of 

Veterans Affairs, has submitted the 

collection of information abstracted 

below to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for review and comment. 

The PRA submission describes the 

nature of the information collection and 

its expected cost and burden; it includes 

the actual data collection instrument. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before January 4, 2006. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY OF

THE SUBMISSION CONTACT: Denise 

McLamb, Records Management Service 

(005E3), Department of Veterans Affairs, 

810 Vermont Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20420, (202) 565–8374, 

FAX (202) 565–6950 or e-mail: 

denise.mclamb@mail.va.gov. Please 

refer to ‘‘OMB Control No. 2900–0613.’’

Send comments and 

recommendations concerning any 

aspect of the information collection to 

VA’s OMB Desk Officer, OMB Human 

Resources and Housing Branch, New 

Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 

Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395–7316. 

Please refer to ‘‘OMB Control No. 2900–

0613’’ in any correspondence. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: Recordkeeping at Flight 

Schools. 

OMB Control Number: 2900–0613. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Abstract: Flight schools are required 

to maintain records on students to 

support continued approval of their 

courses. VA uses the data collected to 

determine whether the courses and 

students meet the requirements for 

flight training benefits and to properly 

pay students. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to