alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

------------------------------------------------------------x 

RITCHIE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.L.C., 

RITCHIE RISK-LINKED STRATEGIES 

TRADING (IRELAND), LIMITED, RITCHIE 

RISK-LINKED STRATEGIES TRADING 

(IRELAND) II, LIMITED, WALKERS SPV 

LIMITED, as trustee for Ritchie Risk-Linked 

Life Strategies Trust I and Ritchie Life Strategies 

Master Trust, and RITCHIE RISK-LINKED 

STRATEGIES TRADING, LTD., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

COVENTRY FIRST LLC, THE COVENTRY 

GROUP, INC., MONTGOMERY CAPITAL, 

INC., LST I LLC, ALAN BUERGER, 

CONSTANCE BUERGER, REID S. 

BUERGER, ANTONIO MUNIZ, ALEX 

SELDIN, NEAL JACOBS, EILEEN SHOVLIN, 

and JIM DODARO, 

Defendants. 

------------------------------------------------------------x 

 

07 Civ. 3494 (DLC) 

ECF Case 

NOTICE OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the accompanying Memorandum of Law and all the 

prior proceedings herein, Plaintiffs Ritchie Capital Management, L.L.C., Ritchie Risk-Linked 

Strategies Trading (Ireland), Limited, Ritchie Risk-Linked Strategies Trading (Ireland) II, 

Limited, Walkers SPV Limited, and Ritchie Risk-Linked Strategies Trading, Ltd. will move this 

Court before the Honorable Denise L. Cote, United States District Judge, United States 

Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

59(e) and Local Civil Rule 6.3 for reconsideration of the Court’s Opinion and Order dated July 

17, 2007. 

Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 47 Filed 08/01/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

 

 

 

Dated: August 1, 2007 

Respectfully submitted, 

LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. PUCCIO 

Thomas P. Puccio (TPP-8403) 

230 Park Avenue 

New York, NY 10169 

Tel: (212) 883-6383 

Fax: (212) 883-6388 

ROBBINS, RUSSELL, ENGLERT, ORSECK & 

UNTEREINER LLP 

By: /s/ Lawrence S. Robbins 

Lawrence S. Robbins (LR-8917) 

Gary A. Orseck 

Rachel S. Li Wai Suen 

Daniel R. Walfish 

1801 K Street, N.W. 

Suite 411 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Tel: (202) 775-4500 

Fax: (202) 775-4510 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 47 Filed 08/01/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of the Claim of George P. Smith, Respondent, *v.*George W. Washburn & Co. et al., Appellants. State Industrial Commission, Respondent.

*Smith v.'Washburn & Co.,*183 App. Div. 911, affirmed.

(Argued October 2, 1918;

decided October 22, 1918.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 5, 1918, unanimously affirming-an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The claimant was employed by the defendant in the business of manufacturing brick, and while engaged in repairing machinery in the brick yard, in the regular course of his employ*620ment, was struck by an iron bar upon the head, which caused paralysis. As a result of the accident, and since the third day thereafter, he was rendered mentally incompetent, and has been totally disabled from that date. Written notice of the injury was not given the employer within ten days, but the industrial commission found that the accident was reported to the employer-superintendent, then in charge of the brick yard, after the accident, and that since the three days after the accident the condition of the claimant constituted a good and sufficient reason why notice could not have been given. It further found that written claim for compensation was not filed within the year, but that the claimant was mentally incompetent from the third day after the accident and during the period of one year after the injury. The industrial commission, therefore, excused the giving of the written notice and found that no limitation of time in respect to claimant’s failure to file a claim could run as against the claimant because of his mental incompetency.

*Bertram L. Pettigrew*and *W. L. Glenney*for appellants.

*Merton E. Lewis, Attorney-General (E. C. Aiken*of counsel), for State Industrial Commission, respondent.

*Leverett J. Luce*and *Henry C. Quinby*for claimant, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chase, Cuddeback, Hogan and Crane, Jj. Dissenting: His cock, Ch. J., Collin and McLaughlin, JJ.
<PAGE>   1


11. Statement re computation of per share earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              First quarter       First quarter
                                                                  ended                ended
                                                            December 31, 1997    December 31, 1996
                                                            -----------------    -----------------
<S>                                                             <C>                 <C>         
Net income (loss) in thousands                                  $    1,096          $      (838)
                                                                ==========          ===========

Shares outstanding at beginning of period                        7,664,253            7,450,878

Net issuance of shares under stock award
  plans, weighted average                                            2,974               21,698
                                                                ----------          ----------

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic earnings
per share calculation                                            7,667,227            7,472,576

Effect of dilutive securities:
Assumed exercise of stock options,
  weighted average of incremental shares                           294,649                   --

Assumed purchase of stock under stock
  purchase plan, weighted average                                   32,706                   --
                                                                ----------          ----------

Average shares and common share
  equivalents - diluted earnings per share calculation
                                                                 7,994,582            7,472,576
                                                                ==========          ===========

Basic earning (loss) per share                                  $      .14          $      (.11)
                                                                ==========          ===========

Diluted earnings (loss) per share                               $      .14          $      (.11)
                                                                ==========          ===========
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.1
 LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED
DEFERRED STOCK UNIT PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
  ARTICLE I
INTRODUCTION
 Purposes.
 Effective Date.
 ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
ADMINISTRATION
 In General.
 Plan Amendment and Termination
 2




---



##### 



ARTICLE IV
ELIGIBILITY AND AWARDS
  ARTICLE V
ACCOUNTS AND INVESTMENTS
 Accounts
 Hypothetical Nature of Accounts and Investments.
 Stock Units.
  3




---



##### 



Dividend Equivalents.
 Reports to Participants.
 4




---



##### 



ARTICLE VI
PAYMENTS
 Entitlement to Payment.
 Payment Commencement Date.
 Form and Amount of Payment.
   5




---



##### 



ARTICLE VII
MISCELLANEOUS
 Rights Not Assignable.
 Certain Rights Reserved.
 Withholding Taxes.
 Incapacity.
 Obligation to Provide Contact Information.
 Forfeitures.
 6




---



##### 



Successors.
 Compliance with Laws.
 Titles.
 Separability of Provisions.
 Governing Law.
   Kurt L. DarrowPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 7
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 1 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 2 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 3 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 4 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 5 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 6 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 7 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 8 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 9 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 10 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 11 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 12 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 13 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 14 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 15 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 16 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 17 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 18 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 19 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 20 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 21 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 22 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 23 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 24 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 25 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 26 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 27 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 28 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 29 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 30 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 31 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 32 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 33 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 34 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 35 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 36 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 37 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 38 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 39 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 40 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 41 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 42 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 43 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 44 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 7-2 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 45 of 45
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.3



                   Certificate Furnished Under Section 906
                      Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Barry C. Cooper, Chief Financial Officer of The Laclede Group, Inc.,
hereby certify that

       (a)    To the best of my knowledge, the accompanying report on Form
              10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with
              the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
              Exchange Act of 1934, and

       (b)    To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the
              accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
              31, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
              financial condition and results of operations of The Laclede
              Group, Inc.


Date:    April 22, 2003
     ---------------------





                              /s/ Barry C. Cooper
                              -----------------------------------------
                              Barry C. Cooper
                              Chief Financial Officer












A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Laclede Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Laclede
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 21.1



List of Subsidiaries



|                                      |  |                              
|------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Subsidiary Legal Name                 |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Blue Coat Systems Canada, Inc.        |  | Canada                       
|                                      | 
|Blue Coat Systems Ltd. (UK)           |  | UK                           
|                                      | 
|CacheFlow Australia Pty. Ltd.         |  | Australia                    
|                                      | 
|Blue Coat Systems International, Inc. |  | Delaware                     
|                                      | 
|Blue Coat Systems Hong Kong Ltd.      |  | Hong Kong                    
|                                      | 
|CacheFlow Netherlands B.V.            |  | Netherlands                  
|                                      | 
|Blue Coat Systems K.K. (Japan)        |  | Japan                        
|                                      | 
|Entera Corporation                    |  | Delaware                     
|                                      | 
|Blue Coat Systems Latvia, SIA         |  | Latvia                       
|                                      | 
|Blue Coat Systems, Belgium B.V.B.A.   |  | Belgium                      
|                                      | 
|Riga Corporation                      |  | Delaware                     
|                                      | 
|Cerberian, Inc.                       |  | Delaware
#### McKEE v. SPINNING COMPANY

No. 168 PC.

Case below: 54 N.C.'App. 558.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 March 1982.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Keystone
Consolidated Industries, Inc.'s consolidated financial statements for the three
months ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          46,261
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,728
<ALLOWANCES>                                       647
<INVENTORY>                                     39,418
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               144,397
<PP&E>                                         271,018
<DEPRECIATION>                                 174,915
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 366,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,958
<BONDS>                                        101,143
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,027
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   366,394
<SALES>                                        277,427
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               279,662
<CGS>                                          247,481
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  247,481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,733
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   178
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,151
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,481
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,670
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,670
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.00
        

</TABLE>
No. 1398, Misc.

#### Withers *v.*Nash, Warden.

Supreme Court of Missouri. Certiorari denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

JOHN E. ANDRUS MEMORIAL, INC. (d/b/a ANDRUS 

ON HUDSON),

Plaintiff,

-againstRICHARD F. DAINES, as Commissioner of the New York 

State Department of Health,

Defendant.

x

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

x

2007 Civ. 3432 (CLB)(MDF)

AFFIRMATION OF

SERVICE

STATE OF NEW YORK )

: ss.:

COUNTY OF NEW YORK )

BRIAN T. MCGOVERN, an attorney at law of the State of New York affirms, 

under penalty of perjury, that:

1) I am not a party to this action, am over 18 years of age and reside in Sea 

Cliff, New York.

2) On April 11, 2008, I caused to be served Plaintiff John E. Andrus 

Memorial, Inc.’s Notice of Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, Affidavit of Betsy Biddle in 

Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, Memorandum of Law in Support of

Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 28-6 Filed 04/15/2008 Page 1 of 2
-2-

Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, and Proposed Findings of Fact in Support of 

Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction by sending a true copy thereof via electronic mail 

to John Gasior, attorney for the defendant.

Dated: April 15, 2008

s/Brian T. McGovern

Brian T. McGovern

Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 28-6 Filed 04/15/2008 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Kellwood Company and Subsidiaries Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet at January 31, 1996, and from the Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Earnings and Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash
Flows for the nine months ended January 31, 1996, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                          13,485
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  198,636
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,620
<INVENTORY>                                    280,369
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               513,565
<PP&E>                                         169,538
<DEPRECIATION>                                 104,789
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 764,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          281,504
<BONDS>                                        126,178
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        94,374
<OTHER-SE>                                     223,136
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   764,873
<SALES>                                      1,054,750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,054,750
<CGS>                                          844,230
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  844,230
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               163,335
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,850
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,266
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,919
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,619
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,619
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .82
        

</TABLE>
Order entered October 15 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00755 - CV IN THE ESTATE OF RAF FAELE MARTINI PANDOZ Y On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR - 18 - 03717 - 1



### O RDER T his appeal was filed June 20, 2019, after the trial court pronounced its ruling but three months before t he court signed the c omplained - of order determining appellant lacks standing to challenge th e underlying heirship proceeding and determining the heirs of the Estate . Before the Court are the court reporter’s September 19, 2019 request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record , appellee’s July 9, 2019 motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely , and appellee’s October 11, 2019 motion to consolidate appellate cause numbers 05 - 19 - 01 0 50 - CV, 05 - 19 - 01181 - CV, and 05 - 19 - 01182 - CV, all of which stem from the same underlying heirship proceeding , with this appeal . We rule as follows. We DENY appel lee’s motion to dismiss. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 27.1(a). We also DENY the reporter’s extension request as moot as the reporter’s record has been received . We ORDER the reporter’s record received September 24, 2019 filed as of the date of this order.We GRAN T the motion to consolidate a nd CONSOLIDATE appellate cause number s

05 - 19 - 01050 - CV, 05 - 19 - 01181 - CV, and 05 - 19 - 01182 - CV into this appeal. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to transfer all documents from appellate cause numbers 05 - 19 - 01050 - CV, 05 - 19 - 01181 - CV , and 05 - 19 - 01182 - CV into this appeal. For administrative purposes, appellate cause numbers 05 - 19 - 01050 - CV, 05 - 19 - 01181 - CV, and 05 - 19 - 01182 - CV are treated as closed. The parties shall now use only cause number 05 - 19 - 007 55 - CV when referencing the appeal. As it appears the appellate record is complete, we ORDER appellant to file her opening brief no later than November 1 4 , 2019. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Dallas County Clerk John F. Warren; Jackie Galindo, Official Court Reporter for Probate Court No. 1; and, the parties. /s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Keystone
Consolidated Industries, Inc.'s consolidated financial statements for the nine
months ended September 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,443
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,233
<INVENTORY>                                     49,110
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               112,406
<PP&E>                                         339,691
<DEPRECIATION>                                 195,503
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 391,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,835
<BONDS>                                        102,033
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,560
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,113
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   391,877
<SALES>                                        289,148
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               290,027
<CGS>                                          265,217
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  265,217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,644
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,292
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,362
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,512
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,949
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,563
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,563
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
        

</TABLE>