alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Construction

Toolbox Talk

Arc Welding and

Electrical Safety

Arc welding is safe if the unit is properly inspected and 

used. You can receive a shock, however, from the primary 

(input) voltage if you touch a lead or other electrically 

“hot” component inside the welder while touching the 

welder case or grounded metal.

Marc’s Story 

Marc was using an arc welder to install metal 

subflooring on a balcony at a construction site. He 

touched exposed wires on the welding cables and 

was electrocuted. Investigators found that earlier 

repairs to the welding cables had been done wrong, 

leaving them frayed and exposed.

# What caused this incident? 

# How could this have been prevented?

# Have you ever been injured while welding, or 

do you know someone who has? If so, what 

happened? 

Remember This

Before starting:

• Inspect the arc welder. Look for frayed welding leads 

and damage to the cable insulation and welder.

• Read all warning labels and instruction manuals.

• Ground the welder case so that if a problem develops 

inside it, a fuse will blow and disconnect the power. 

• Insulate your body from the metal you are welding. 

While working:

• Do not rest your body, arms, or legs on the metal 

being welded, especially if your clothing is wet or your 

skin is exposed. 

• Use mats of plywood, rubber, or some other dry 

insulation to stand or lie on.

• Do not touch the electrode or metal parts of the

electrode holder with bare skin or wet clothing. 

• Wear dry gloves in good condition when welding. 

• Avoid welding in wet or damp areas, to prevent 

electrical shock. 

• Always wear long sleeves and appropriate protective 

clothing, eye protection, gloves, and footwear to 

protect skin from burns due to ultraviolet light, sparks, 

and molten metal. 

How can we stay safe today?

What will we do at the worksite to prevent injuries from electrical hazards while arc welding?

OSHA Standard: 1926.351
Construction

Toolbox Talk

Arc Welding and

Electrical Safety

; Look for frayed welding leads and damage to the cable insulation and welder.

; Ground the welder case so that if a problem develops inside it, a fuse will blow and disconnect the power.

; Use mats of plywood, rubber, or some other dry insulation to stand or lie on.

; Wear dry gloves in good condition, eye protection, long sleeves, and footwear when welding.

GET 

INFORMATION 

CDC/NIOSH INFO: 1-800-CDC-INFO (1-800-232-4636) | TTY: 1-800-232-6348 | cdc.gov/info | cdc.gov/niosh

CPWR: Contact 301-578-8500 | cpwr-r2p@cpwr.com | www.cpwr.com/toolbox-talks

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2022-128 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB2022128 | August 2022
#### STATE v. MARION (BUDDY) HOOKS.

(Filed 1 November, 1967.)

Appeal by defendant from *Gwyn,*J., March 13, 1967 Mixed Session of Davidson.

Defendant was arrested on a warrant issued October 14, 1966, by the Davidson County Court, charging the felony of assault with intent to commit rape. In said Davidson County Court, probable cause was found; and defendant was bound over to the next session of Davidson Superior Court. At November 14, 1966 Mixed Session of Davidson Superior Court, the grand jury returned as a true bill an indictment charging that defendant on October 14, 1966, “unlawfully, wilfully, and feloniously did assault one Vera Macemore, a female, with intent, her the said Vera Macemore, unlawfully, feloniously, by force and against her will to ravish and carnally know Vera Macemore,” etc., being the felony charged in said warrant.

On November 16, 1966, the court, based on defendant’s affidavit of indigency, appointed Walter F. Brinkley, Jr., Esq., a member of the Davidson County Bar, to represent defendant. On December 10, 1966, defendant was committed to the Dorothea Dix Hospital at Raleigh for a period of sixty days’ observation and examination pursuant to the provisions of G.S. 122-91. On or about February 2, 1967, the Hospital physicians reported that defendant was “Without Psychosis (Not Insane)”; that he was able to plead to the bill of indictment and understood the charges against him; and that he knew the difference between right and wrong.

Upon arraignment on said indictment at March 13, 1967 Mixed Session of Davidson Superior Court, defendant, a male person twenty-eight years of age, through his said counsel, tendered a plea of guilty to an included crime of less degree, namely, assault on a female, a misdemeanor, which plea was accepted by the State.

The court, after hearing the testimony of Mrs. Macemore and of defendant and after consideration of the report of said Hospital physicians, pronounced judgment as follows:

“Let the defendant be confined in the common jail of Davidson County for a term of two (2) years to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Prison Department. It is requested as a part of this judgment the defendant be given such examination and treatment and care as he is physically nervous *(sic)*and has an emotional condition, *(sic)*This treatment is to be given while he is in prison.”

Defendant excepted and appealed.

*714
      *Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Rich for the State.*

*Walser, Brinkley, Walser & McGirt for defendant appellant.*

Per Curiam.

Although defendant’s court-appointed counsel has perfected his appeal in compliance with defendant’s wishes, the record does not show error prejudicial to defendant or of sufficient substance to warrant particular discussion. The impression prevails that the State’s acceptance of the misdemeanor plea should be attributed to the efforts of defendant’s able and conscientious counsel in bringing to the court all circumstances tending to explain in some measure defendant’s anti-social behavior. Hence, the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Case 1:07-cr-00373-SHS Document 14 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. PERRY

No. 42.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 185.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 25 August 1975. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 25 August 1975.
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-21 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-21 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Jacada Ltd. (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Thomas H. Clear, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert C.
Aldworth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 31, 2010



|    |  |                                                                                                           
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Thomas H. Clear                                                                                       
|    |  | Thomas H. Clear Chief
Executive Officer  /s/ Robert C. Aldworth Robert C. Aldworth Chief Financial
Officer
#### STATE v. LONG

No. 82 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 662.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 November 1978. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 3 November 1978.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71806-71809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23483]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 06-15]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 06-15 with attached transmittal and policy 
justification.

    Dated: November 23, 2005.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 71807]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30NO05.069


[[Page 71808]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30NO05.070


[[Page 71809]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30NO05.071

[FR Doc. 05-23483 Filed 11-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael J. Gennaro, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Blue Coat Systems, Inc.; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 26, 2009



/s/    MICHAEL J. GENNAROMichael J. GennaroPrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer
----

| 1.  | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cytori Therapeutics, Inc.; |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 30, 2013    |
|-------------------------|
| /s/ Mark E. Saad        |   |
| Mark E. Saad,           |
| Chief Financial Officer |

----
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM     Document 3      Filed 05/02/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM     Document 3      Filed 05/02/2007     Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00122-CV

Heriberto Martinez Gonzalez

v.

EC Lewisville, LLC, d/b/a Elite Care 

Emergency Center; Greater Houston 

Emergency Physicians, PLLC, d/b/a 

Elite Care Emergency Center; and 

Dr. Harvey Castro

§

§

§

§

From the 158th District Court

of Denton County (15-04212-158)

March 8, 2018

Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the 

trial court is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for further 

proceedings consistent with this opinion. 

It is further ordered that appellees EC Lewisville, LLC, d/b/a Elite Care 

Emergency Center; Greater Houston Emergency Physicians, PLLC, d/b/a Elite 

care Emergency Center/ and Dr. Harvey Castro shall pay all of the costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Sue Walker___________________

 Justice Sue Walker
#### STATE v. THOMPSON

No. 36PC

Case below: 50 NC App 484

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 May 1981.
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM Document 5-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM Document 5-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 2 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM Document 5-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 3 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM Document 5-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 4 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM Document 5-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 5 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM Document 5-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 6 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM Document 5-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 7 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM Document 5-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 8 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM Document 5-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 9 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM Document 5-2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 10 of 10
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 7 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 1 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 7 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 2 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 7 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 3 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 7 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 4 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 7 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 5 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 7 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 6 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 7 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 7 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 7 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 8 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 7 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 9 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 7 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 10 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 7 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 11 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 7 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 12 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 7 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 13 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 7 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 14 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 7 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 15 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 7 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 16 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 7 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 17 of 18
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 7 Filed 05/29/2008 Page 18 of 18
#### HOSPITAL v. DAVIS

No. 1 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 479.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 3 February 1976.
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 1 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 2 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 3 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 4 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 5 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 6 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 7 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 8 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 9 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 10 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 11 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 12 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 13 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 14 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 15 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 16 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 17 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 18 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 19 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 20 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 21 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 22 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 23 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 24 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 25 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 26 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 27 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 28 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 29 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 30 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 31 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 32 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 33 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 34 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 35 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 36 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 37 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 38 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 39 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 45-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 40 of 40
#### COMR. OF INSURANCE v. AUTOMOBILE RATE OFFICE

No. 7 PC.

Case below: 24 N.C. App. 223.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 February 1975.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's financial statements for the fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         136,311
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  168,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (20,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    129,861
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               453,175
<PP&E>                                       1,390,408
<DEPRECIATION>                               (447,750)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,490,899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,596,452
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,800
<OTHER-SE>                                   (119,583)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,490,899
<SALES>                                      1,980,203
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,980,203
<CGS>                                          972,802
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,533,472
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,181
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,895
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,551,252)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,551,252)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,551,252)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**FORM10-Q**

 

**Section 1350Certifications**

 

**Quarterended June 30, 2004**

 

I, Herbert Lindo, Chairman, President and PrincipalFinancial Officer of Kenilworth Systems Corporation (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)               the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company forthe second quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)               the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

Dated: August 11, 2004

 

 
|   | /s/ Herbert Lindo                                    |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Herbert Lindo                                        |
|   | Chairman, President and Principal  Financial Officer |

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 3 of 3
WILLIAM GOMILLION,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-3297

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 4, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Marianne L. Aho, Judge.

William Gomillion, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
#### ANDERSON v. WILLIARD

No. 71 PC.

Case below: 11 N.C. App. 70.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 30 July 1971.
#### STATE v. BARBOUR

No. 39 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 259.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 March 1976. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 2 March 1976.
##### 



Exhibit 23.2 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Members
ARTISTdirect Records, LLC: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-122027, No.
333-53208, No. 333-38104, No. 333-63572 and No. 333-68396) on Forms S-8 of ARTISTdirect, Inc. , of
our report dated April 6, 2004, except for Note 14, which is
March 1, 2005, with respect to the
balance sheet of ARTISTdirect Records, LLC (the Company) as of December 31, 2003, and the related
statements of operations, members deficit and cash flows for the year then ended, which report
appears in the December 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K of ARTISTdirect, Inc. Our report dated
April 6, 2004, except for Note 14, which is March 1, 2005, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has
incurred substantial operating losses and negative cash flows from operations to date and needs
additional capital to fund its operations, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty. /s/GUMBINER SAVETT INC. Santa Monica, California
May 13, 2005 112
#### THORPE v. INSURANCE CO.

No. 96 PC

Case below: 49 NC App

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 December 1980.
#### McLEAN v. SALE

No. 163 P.C.

Case below: 38 N.C. App. 520.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1979.
been resolved. Accordingly we conclude we lack jurisdiction over this

appeal and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Saitta



# tekeit Pickering P

cc: Hon. Elliott A. Sattler, District Judge David P. Woods Karen L. Woods Akerman LLP/Las Vegas Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) I 947 A ° C/Z

1 P