alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1989 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1989

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for 
transparency of Medicare secondary payer reporting information, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 26, 2019

Mr. Scott of South Carolina (for himself and Mr. Cardin) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for 
transparency of Medicare secondary payer reporting information, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Provide Accurate Information 
Directly Act'' or ``PAID Act''.

SEC. 2. TRANSPARENCY OF MEDICARE SECONDARY PAYER REPORTING INFORMATION.

    Section 1862(b)(8)(G) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
395y(b)(8)(G)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``information.--The Secretary'' and 
        inserting ``information.--
                            ``(i) In general.--The Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(ii) Specified information.--In 
                        responding to any query related to subparagraph 
                        (A)(i), the Secretary, notwithstanding any 
                        other provision of law, shall--
                                    ``(I) identify to the applicable 
                                plan whether a claimant subject to the 
                                query is, or during the preceding 3-
                                year period has been, entitled to 
                                benefits under the program under this 
                                title on any basis; and
                                    ``(II) to the extent applicable, 
                                identify by plan name and address any 
                                Medicare Advantage plan under part C 
                                and any prescription drug plan under 
                                part D in which the claimant is 
                                enrolled or has been enrolled during 
                                such period.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 2 shall apply with respect to 
queries submitted on or after the date that is one year after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:07-cv-03436-LTS     Document 13      Filed 11/08/2007     Page 1 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-03436-LTS     Document 13      Filed 11/08/2007     Page 2 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-03436-LTS     Document 13      Filed 11/08/2007     Page 3 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-03436-LTS     Document 13      Filed 11/08/2007     Page 4 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-03436-LTS     Document 13      Filed 11/08/2007     Page 5 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-03436-LTS     Document 13      Filed 11/08/2007     Page 6 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03389-RWS     Document 5      Filed 10/09/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03389-RWS     Document 5      Filed 10/09/2007     Page 2 of 2
#### GREEN v. EURE, SECRETARY OF STATE

No. 12 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 605.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 February 1976. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 3 February 1976.
Exhibit 10.01

                  EXTENSION OF RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN
                      FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS


     WHEREAS, this Corporation has previously adopted the Laclede Gas
Company Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors, which became
effective January 25, 1990 and was extended through January 26, 2000; and

     WHEREAS, this Corporation desires to extend the term of the Plan
through the period ending January 31, 2005, subject to further extension of
the Corporation's Board of Directors;

     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Section 3 of Article V of the Plan
is hereby amended, effective on December 16, 1999 by deleting the date
"January 26, 2000" in such section and substituting, in lieu of such deleted
date, the date "January 31, 2005," and

     FURTHER RESOLVED, that except as expressly amended and extended above,
the Plan is hereby ratified, confirmed and approved under the same terms and
conditions as existed immediately prior to the above amendments; and

     FURTHER RESOLVED, that the officers of the Corporation are hereby
authorized and directed, jointly and severally, for and in the name and on
behalf of the Corporation and without the need for any countersignatures,
unless otherwise required by applicable law, to execute and deliver any and
all certificates, agreements and other documents; take any and all steps and
do any and all things which they may deem necessary or appropriate to
effectuate the purposes of the foregoing resolutions and the extension and
amendment to the Plan set forth above.


























                                 Page 20
Unassociated Document


    CERTIFICATE
OF DESIGNATION

    OF
SERIES A PREFERRED SHARES

    OF
CEMTREX, INC.

    
      	
               

              Pursuant
      to Section 242 of the

              General
      Corporation Law of the State of Delaware

               

            


    

    The holders of the Series A Preferred
Shares par value $0.001 (the “Series A Preferred Shares”) of CEMTREX, INC. (the
“Company”) shall have the following rights and preferences:

    


    1.           Designation and
Amount. The number of shares constituting the series of Series A
Preferred Shares shall be 1,000,000.

    


    2.           Voting.

    


    (a)           Each
issued and outstanding Series A Preferred Share shall be entitled to the number
of votes equal to the result of: (i) the number of shares of common stock of the
Company (the "Common Shares") issued and outstanding at the time of such vote
multiplied by 1.01; divided by (ii) the total number of Series A Preferred
Shares issued and outstanding at the time of such vote, at each meeting of
shareholders of the Company with respect to any and all matters presented to the
shareholders of the Company for their action or consideration, including the
election of directors. Holders of Series A Preferred Shares shall vote together
with the holders of Common Shares as a single class.

    


    (b)           The
Company shall not amend, alter or repeal the Series A Preferred Shares, special
rights or other powers of the Series A Preferred Shares so as to affect
adversely the Series A Preferred Shares, without the written consent or
affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the then outstanding
aggregate number of shares of such adversely affected Series A Preferred Shares,
given in writing or by vote at a meeting, consenting or voting (as the case may
be) separately as a class.

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, CEMTREX, INC. has caused this Certificate of Designation of the
Series A Preferred Shares to be signed and attested to by its duly authorized
officers as of the 8th day of September, 2009.

     

    
      
        	 	
                CEMTREX,
      INC.

              	 
	 	 	 	 
	
              	
                By:
      

              	/s/ 	 
	 	Name: 	

                Arun
      Govil

              	 
	 	Title:
      	

                Chairman,
      CEO and President
Order entered September 9, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00479-CV

SHARLET O. MITCHELL, ET AL., Appellants

V.

NUGGEHALI NEIL SATYU, MD AND ZAHOUR AHMED, MD, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-03855-D

ORDER

We GRANT appellee Zahoor Ahmed, M.D.’s unopposed motion for extension of time

and ORDER his brief be filed no later than September 18, 2014. No further extensions will be 

granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
#### CEDAR WORKS v. MFG. CO. and EDWARDS v. CHESSON

No. 205 PC.

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 233.

Petition by defendant Chesson for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 August 1979.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,299
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,698
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,286
<PP&E>                                      27,040
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,146
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,843
<BONDS>                                        287
<COMMON>                                     6,550
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,146
<SALES>                                     47,045
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,045
<CGS>                                       36,532
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               36,532
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             311
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,477
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (365)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,842
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,842
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.78
        

</TABLE>
#### CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM v. CONCRETE CO.

No. 13 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 186.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 1978.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-19-00392-CV

Elisa SAUKKO and all other occupants,

Appellants

v.

Lois MORGADO,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CV04005

Honorable John Longoria, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 11, 2019

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellants Elisa Saukko and all other occupants filed a pro se notice of appeal from a 

judgment of eviction signed on June 6, 2019. Their brief was originally due July 22, 2019. Neither 

the brief nor a motion for extension of time was filed. On August 2, 2019, we ordered appellants

to file, not later than August 12, 2019, their brief and a written response reasonably explaining 

their failure to timely file the brief. We advised appellants that if they failed to file a brief and the 

written response by the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See
04-19-00392-CV

- 2 -

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). Appellants have not filed a brief or the written response as ordered by this

court.

We therefore order this appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. We further order that no 

costs be assessed against appellants because they are indigent.

PER CURIAM
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Nathan Altenhofen, * From the 446th District Court

of Ector County,

Trial Court No. CC2

- 24,836.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 8

- 00 168

- CV * August 9, 2018

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

Christina Bush, (Panel consists of: W illson

, J.;

Bailey, J. ; and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction

. Therefore, in accordance with this

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
#### STATE v. CHAMBERS

No. 126 PC.

Case below: 21 N.C. App. 450.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 July 1974.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM KINARK
CORP.'S INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, SET FORTH IN THE
ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             489
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,243
<ALLOWANCES>                                       263
<INVENTORY>                                      4,559
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,554
<PP&E>                                          32,421
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,702
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,452
<BONDS>                                          6,401
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           819
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,127
<SALES>                                         36,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,465
<CGS>                                           28,630
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,922
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 603
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    940
<INCOME-TAX>                                       403
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                537
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       537
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
13.1



CERTIFICATIONS



The certifications
set forth below are being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017 as
amended by Amendment No.1 thereto (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code.



Guangyu Yuan,
the Chief Executive Officer and Weizhi Xie, the Chief Financial Officer of CNOOC Limited, each certifies that, to the best of
his knowledge:



| | 1. | the
                                         Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
                                         Act; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the
                                         information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                                         condition and results of operations of CNOOC Limited.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 19, 2018



|   
|---
|By:
|   
|   

|   
|---
|By:
|   
|
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS     Document 20      Filed 06/12/2008     Page 1 of 1
### The Honorable R. E. Longstaff, United States District Judge 1 

### for the Southern District of Iowa. ___________ No. 96-1793

___________ David Hill, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States State of Iowa; Steve McCoy; * District Court for the Michael Moorland; Sam Erhart, * Southern District of Iowa. Judge; Clerk of Court of * Wapello County; Wapello County * [UNPUBLISHED] Sheriff's Department; Unnamed * Defendants, Unknown Agents of * Government/State, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: April 3, 1996 Filed: May 3, 1996

___________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Iowa pri soner David Hill appeals the dismissal as frivolous of hi s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint by the District Court for the South ern District 1 of Iowa. Hill compla ined he did not receive preliminary notice of a 1991 state replevin proceeding. Upon initial review and before service of process, the district court held that under Iowa law the cause of action accrued in 1991 when service of the replevin notice gave Hill knowledge of al l the facts supporting his claim. The district court determined

### -2-

the two -year Iowa statute of limitations applicable to § 1983 action s bar redthe suit, concluded Hill's complaint lacked an arguable basis i n law, denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and summarily dismissed th e complaint without prejudice as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d).
Adis trict court may dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint unde r § 1915(d) when it is apparent the statute of limitations has run. Myers v. Vogal , 960 F.2d 750, 751 (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam). We agree Hill knew all the facts supporting his claim upon ser vice of replevin papers in 1991 and Iowa's applicable two-year statute of l imitations barred his 1996 suit. See Wycoff v. Menke , 773 F.2d 983, 984 (8th Cir. 1985), cert . denied , 475 U.S. 1028 (1986). Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. See 8t h Cir. R. 47A(a). A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### LYNCH v. LYNCH

No. 90

Reported: 302 NC 189

Petition by defendant to rehear allowed 7 April 1981 for the limited purpose of considering the points raised in such petition.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Mentored Training Grant Review.                    

*Date:*                         December 21, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         2:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         John F. Connaughton, Ph.D., Scientific Review Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 757, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-7797,                         *connaughton@extra.niddk.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 23, 2005.

Nancy Middendorf,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-23593 Filed 12-2-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### McRORIE v. SHINN

No. 110 PC.

Case below: 11 N.C. App. 475.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 September 1971.
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 5-4 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 5-4 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 2 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 5-4 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 3 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 5-4 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 4 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 5-4 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 5 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 5-4 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 6 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 5-4 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 7 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 5-4 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 8 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 5-4 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 9 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03498-AKH Document 5-4 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 10 of 10
<PAGE>   1
Centrum Industries, Inc.
Exhibit 21 - Subsidiaries of the Registrant

The direct and indirect subsidiaries of Centrum Industries, Inc. and their state
or territory of incorporation are as follows as of June 10, 2000:

Name of Subsidiary                           State or Territory of Incorporation

McInnes Steel Company                        Pennsylvania
McInnes Services, Inc.                       Delaware
Erie Bronze & Aluminum Company               Pennsylvania
Eballoy Glass Products Company               Pennsylvania
McInnes International, Inc.                  U.S. Virgin Islands
Taylor Forge Company                         Tennessee
American Handling, Inc.                      Ohio
Northern Steel Company                       Washington
Micafil, Inc.                                Delaware
LaSalle Exploration, Inc.                    Ohio
Micafil - Axis, LLC (50% equity ownership)   Delaware
#### STATE v. ROGERS

No. 149 PC

Case below: 49 NC App

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 December 1980.