55738 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 189 / Monday, October 1, 2007 / Notices 

ADDRESSES: Submit written, faxed, or email comments by: (1) Mail—Travel 

Management Planning Team; 

Stevensville Ranger District; 88 Main; 

Stevensville, Montana 59870 (2) fax—

(406) 777–7423; (3) e-mail—commentsnorthern-bitterroot@fs.fed.us 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan 

Ritter, Stevensville District Ranger (406) 

777–5461 or Sandy Mack, Project Team 

Leader (406) 777–7415 (see ADDRESSES

above) 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Purpose 

The objectives of the project are to: 1. 

Change the existing motorized 

recreation designations provide quality 

motorized recreation experiences while 

protecting natural resources and 

providing non-motorized recreation 

opportunities. 

• Provide motorized loop routes that 

offer a quality recreational experience, 

with the focus on using old roads and 

linkages with only minor resource 

impacts. 

• Provide areas for non-motorized 

recreation experiences. 

• Close routes to motorized use that 

have resource concerns that can’t 

reasonably be mitigated. 

2. Close routes that offer little value 

as a motorized experience and have 

resource concerns. 

3. Clarify and simplify the motor 

vehicle use designations. 

4. Comply with the 2005 Travel 

Management Rule. 

Proposed Action 

The proposed action establishes clear, 

standardized designations of where 

motorized recreation is appropriate, 

sustainable and desirable on the 

Bitterroot National Forest. It would 

provide 2,487 miles of routes open to 

wheeled motorized use including: 25 

mi. of roads open to all vehicles, 

yearlong or seasonal (mixed-motorized); 

1,479 mi. of roads open to highway legal 

vehicles only, yearlong or seasonal; 746 

mi. of trails open to vehicles 50′′ or less 

in width, yearlong or seasonal; 237 mi. 

of trails open to motorcycles, yearlong 

or seasonal. It would also provide 

1,030,405 acres of non-motorized use 

(1⁄2 mile or more from wheeled 

motorized use designations) across the 

Forest. The proposed action would 

provide 58 miles of groomed 

snowmobile trails, 341 miles of open 

snowmobile routes and 608,031 acres 

open to snowmobile use. 

Alternatives to the proposed action 

will be developed based on public 

comments. 

Responsible Official 

The responsible official for the Travel 

Management Planning Project is Dave T. 

Bull, Forest Supervisor, Bitterroot 

National Forest 1801 N. First, Hamilton 

59840–3114. 

Nature of Decision To Be Made 

The Responsible Official will 

determine whether or not to proceed 

with the proposed motorized use 

designations. 

Scoping Process 

Comments will be accepted during 

the 60-day scoping period as described 

in this notice of intent. To assist in 

commenting, a coping package 

providing more detailed information on 

the project proposal has been prepared 

and is available to interested parties. 

Contact Sandy Mack, Project Leader at 

the address listed in this notice of intent 

if you would like to receive a copy. The 

information is also available on the web 

at www.fs.fed.us/r1/bitterroot/projects/ 

motorizedlrec.shtml, and at each 

District Office and at the public libraries 

in Darby, Hamilton, Stevensville and 

Missoula. the Forest will schedule 

public meetings in November, prior to 

the end of the public comment period. 

Meeting times and locations will be 

announced at a later date. 

Comment Requested 

This notice of intent initiates the 

scoping process that guides the 

development of the environmental 

impact statement. 

Early Notice of Importance of Public 

Participation in Subsequent 

Environmental Review: A draft 

environmental impact statement will be 

prepared for comment. The comment 

period on the draft environmental 

impact statement will be at least 45 days 

from the date the Environmental 

Protection Agency publishes the notice 

of availability in the Federal Register. 

The Forest Service believes, at this 

early stage, it is important to give 

reviewers notice of several court rulings 

related to public participation in the 

environmental review process. First, 

reviewers of draft environmental impact 

statements must structure their 

participation in the environmental 

review of the proposal so that it is 

meaningful and alerts an agency to the 

reviewer’s position and contentions. 

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. 

NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also, 

environmental objections that could be 

raised at the draft environmental impact 

statement stage but that are not raised 

until after completion of the final 

environmental impact statement may be 

waived or dismissed by the courts. City 

of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 

1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin 

Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 

1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of 

these court rulings, it is very important 

that those interested in this proposed 

action participate by the close of the 24 

day comment period so that substantive 

comments and objections are made 

available to the Forest Service at a time 

when it can meaningfully consider them 

and respond to them in the final 

environmental impact statement. 

To assist the Forest Service in 

identifying and considering issues and 

concerns on the proposed action, 

comments on the draft environmental 

impact statement should be as specific 

as possible. It is also helpful if 

comments refer to specific pages or 

chapters of the draft statement. 

Comments may also address the 

adequacy of the draft environmental 

impact statement or the merits of the 

alternatives formulated and discussed in 

the statement. Reviewers may wish to 

refer to the Council on Environmental 

Quality Regulations for implementing 

the procedural provisions of the 

National Environmental Policy Act at 40 

CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points. 

Comments received, including the 

names and addresses of those who 

comment, will be considered part of the 

public record on this proposal and will 

be available for public inspection. 

(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; 

Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section 

21) 

Dated: September 20, 2007. 

Barry Paulson, 

Deputy Forest Supervisor. 

[FR Doc. 07–4805 Filed 9–28–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–M 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Forest Service 

Inyo National Forest, California, Inyo 

National Forest Motorized Travel 

Management EIS 

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. 

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an 

Environmental Impact Statement. 

SUMMARY: The Inyo National Forest 

(INF) will prepare an Environmental 

Impact Statement to disclose the 

impacts associated with the following 

proposed actions: 1. The prohibition of 

wheeled motorized vehicle travel off 

designated National Forest System 

(NFS) roads, NFS trails and areas by the 

public except as allowed by permit or 

other authorization. 2. Changes in the 

INF Transportation System, including 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 189 / Monday, October 1, 2007 / Notices 55739 

the addition of approximately 925 miles 

of existing unauthorized (non-system) 

routes to the current system of National 

Forest System (NFS) roads and 

motorized trails and minor changes to 

existing motor vehicle restrictions. 

DATES: The comment period on the 

proposed action will extend 45 days 

from the date the Notice of Intent is 

published in the Federal Register. 

Completion of the Draft Environmental 

Impact Statement (DEIS) is expected in 

March 2008 and the Final 

Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) 

is expected in October 2008. 

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to: 

Travel Management Team, Inyo 

National Forest, 351 Pacu Lane, Suite 

200, Bishop, CA, 93514. Comments may 

also be mailed electronically to: 

comments-pacificsouthwestinyo@fs.fed.us. Please ensure that 

‘‘Route Designation’’ occurs somewhere 

in the subject line. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marty Hornick, Inyo National Forest, 

351 Pacu Lane, Suite 200, Bishop, CA, 

93514. Phone: (760) 873–2400. E-mail: 

comments-pacificsouthwestinyo@fs.fed.us. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Over the past few decades, the 

availability and capability of motorized 

vehicles, particularly off-highway 

vehicles (OHVs) and sport utility 

vehicles (SUVs) has increased 

tremendously. Nationally, the number 

of OHV users has climbed sevenfold in 

the past 30 years, from approximately 5 

million in 1972 to 36 million in 2000. 

California is experiencing the highest 

level of OHV use of any state in the 

nation. There were 786,914 ATVs and 

OHV motorcycles in California were the 

highest in the U.S. for the last 5 years. 

Four-wheel drive vehicle sales in 

California also increased by 1500% to 

3,046,866 from 1989 to 2002. 

Unmanaged OHV use has resulted in 

unplanned roads and trails, erosion, 

watershed and habitat degradation, and 

impacts to cultural resource sites. 

Compaction and erosion are the primary 

effects of OHV use on soils. Riparian 

areas and aquatic dependent species are 

particularly vulnerable to OHV use. 

Unmanaged recreation, including 

impacts from OHVs, os one of ‘‘Four 

Key Threats Facing the Nation’s Forests 

and Grasslands.’’

(USDA Forest Service, June 2004). 

On August 11, 2003, the Pacific 

Southwest Region of the Forest Service 

entered into a Memorandum of Intent 

(MOI) with the California Off-Highway 

Motor Vehicle Recreation Commission, 

and the Off-Highway Motor Vehicle 

Recreation Division of the California 

Department of Parks and Recreation. 

That MOI set in motion a region-wide 

effort to ‘‘Designate OHV roads, trails, 

and any specifically defined open areas 

for motorized wheeled vehicles on maps 

of the 19 National Forests in California 

by 2007.’’ On November 9, 2005, the 

Forest Service published final travel 

management regulations in the Federal 

Register (FR Vol. 70, No. 216–Nov. 9, 

2005, pp 68264–68291). This final 

Travel Management Rule requires 

designation of those roads, trails, and 

areas that are open to motor vehicle use 

on National Forests. Designations will 

be made by class of vehicle and, if 

appropriate, by time of year. The final 

rule prohibits the use of motor vehicles 

off the designated system as well as use 

of motor vehicles on routes and in areas 

that are not designated. 

On some NFS lands, long managed as 

open to cross-country motor vehicle 

travel, repeated use has resulted in 

unplanned, unauthorized, roads and 

trails. These routes generally developed 

without environmental analysis or 

public involvement, and do not have the 

same status as NFS roads and NFS trails 

included in the forest transportation 

system. Nevertheless, some 

unauthorized routes are well-sited, 

provide excellent opportunities for 

outdoor recreation by motorized and 

non-motorized users, and would 

enhance the National Forest system of 

designated roads, trails and areas. Other 

unauthorized routes are poorly located 

and cause unacceptable impacts. Only 

NFS roads and NFS trails can be 

designated for wheeled motorized 

vehicle use. In order for an 

unauthorized route to be designated, it 

must first be added to the forest 

transportation system. 

In accordance with the MOI, the INF 

recently completed an inventory of 

unauthorized routes on NFS lands and 

identified approximately 1830 miles of 

unauthorized routes. The INF then used 

an interdisciplinary process to conduct 

travel analysis that included working 

with the public to determine whether 

any of the unauthorized routes should 

be proposed for addition to the INF 

transportation system. Roads, trails and 

areas that are currently part of the INF 

transportation system and are open to 

wheeled motorized vehicle travel will 

remain designated for such use except 

as described below under Proposed 

Action. This proposal focuses only on 

the prohibition of wheeled motorized 

vehicle travel off designated routes and 

needed changes to the INF 

transportation system. These changes 

include minor changes to existing motor 

vehicle restrictions and the addition to 

the INF transportation system of some 

existing unauthorized routes that 

provide access to dispersed recreation 

opportunities and a diversity of 

motorized recreation opportunities. The 

proposed action is being carried forward 

in accordance with the Travel 

Management Rule (36 CFR Part 212). 

In accordance with the rule, following 

a decision on this proposal, the Inyo 

National Forest will publish a Motor 

Vehicle Use Map (MVUM) identifying 

all INF roads, trails and areas that are 

designated for motor vehicle use. The 

MVUM shall specify the classes of 

vehicles and, if appropriate, the times of 

year for which use is designated. 

Purpose and Need for Action 

The following needs have been 

identified for this proposal: 

1. There is a need for regulation of 

unmanaged wheeled motorized vehicle 

travel by the public. In their enjoyment 

of the National Forest, motorized 

vehicle users have created numerous 

unauthorized routes. The number of 

such routes continues to grow each year 

with many routes having environmental 

impacts and safety concerns that have 

not been addressed. Currently, motor 

vehicle use is restricted by a 2007 

Temporary Forest Order which limits 

the use of wheeled motorized vehicles 

by the public to existing routes shown 

on the forest order exhibit map. This 

includes routes that are currently on the 

INF transportation system, as well as 

others which have not yet been 

evaluated for suitability for continued 

motorized use. 

The Travel Management Rule, 36 CFR 

Part 212, provides policy for ending the 

trend of unauthorized route 

proliferation and managing the Forest 

transportation system in a sustainable 

manner through designation of 

motorized NFS roads, trails and areas, 

and the prohibition of cross-country 

travel. 

2. There is a need for limited changes 

and additions to the INF transportation 

system to: 

2.1. Provide wheeled motorized access 

to dispersed recreation opportunities, 

such as camping, hunting, fishing, 

hiking, horseback riding and others 

2.2. Provide a diversity of wheeled 

motorized recreational opportunities, 

such as travel in 4X4 vehicles, 

motorcycles, ATVs, passenger 

vehicles, etc. 

It is Forest Service policy to provide a 

diversity of road and trail opportunities 

for experiencing a variety of 

environments and modes of travel 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

55740 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 189 / Monday, October 1, 2007 / Notices 

consistent with the National Forest 

recreation role and land capability (FSM 

2353.03(2)). 

In meeting these needs the proposed 

action must also achieve the following 

purposes: 

A. Avoid impacts to cultural 

resources. 

B. Provide for public safety. 

C. Provide for a diversity of 

recreational opportunities. 

D. Assure adequate access to public 

and private lands. 

E. Provide for adequate maintenance 

and administration of designations 

based on availability of resources and 

funding to do so. 

F. Minimize damage to soil, 

vegetation and other forest resources. 

G. Avoid harassment of wildlife and 

significant disruption of wildlife 

habitat. 

H. Minimize conflicts between 

wheeled motor vehicles and existing or 

proposed recreational uses of NFS 

lands. 

I. Minimize conflicts among different 

classses of wheeled motor vehicle uses 

of NFS lands or neighboring federal 

lands. 

J. Assure compatibility of wheeled 

motor vehicle use with existing 

conditions in populated areas, taking 

into account sound, emisions, etc. 

K. Have valid existing rights of use 

and access (rights-of-way). 

Proposed Action 

1. Prohibition of wheeled motorized 

vehicle travel off the designated NFS 

roads, NFS trails and areas by the public 

except as allowed by permit or other 

authorization. 

2. Additions to the National Forest 

Transportation System—The Inyo 

National Forest curerntly manages and 

maintains approximately 1240 miles of 

NFS roads within Inyo National Forest 

boundaries. Based on the stated purpose 

and need for action, and as a result of 

the recent travel analysis process, the 

INF proposes the addition of 

approximately 870 miles of 

unauthorized routes to its NFS roads, 

which will be open to all vehicles types, 

and 53 miles to its NFS motorized trails, 

of which approximately 16 miles will be 

open to motorcycle only, and 37 miles 

will be open to motorcycles and ATVs 

(<50′′ width). Approximately 3 miles of 

the unauthorized routes proposed will 

be available for public motorized use 

only after mitigation measures have 

been completed, such as stabilization or 

reroutes away from areas of resource 

concern. 

3. Limited Changes to the National 

Forest Transportation System—The INF 

proposes the conversion of 11 miles of 

NFS roads to NFS motorized trails. 

Approximately 4 miles will be limited 

to motorcycle use only; and 7 miles will 

be open only to motorcycles and ATVs 

less than 50′′ in width. 

Maps and tables describing the 

proposed action can found at: http:// 

www.fs.fed.us/r5/inyo/projects/ 

ohvroute5.shtml. 

In addition, maps will be available for 

viewing at: 

Inyo National Forest Supervisor’s 

Office, 351 Pacu Lane, Bishop, CA 

Eastern Sierra Interagency Visitor 

Center, Junction Hwy 395 & SR 136 (1 

mile south of Lone Pine, CA) 

Mammoth Welcome Center, Hwy 203 

east of the Town of Mammoth Lakes, 

CA 

Mono Basin Scenic Area Visitor Center, 

Hwy 395, Lee Vining, CA 

Responsible Official 

Marlene Finley, Acting Forest 

Supervisor, 351 Pacu Lane, Suite 200, 

Bishop, CA 93514 

Nature of Decision To Be Made 

The responsible official will decide 

whether to adopt and implement the 

proposed action, an alternative to the 

proposed action, or take no action to 

make changes to the existing Inyo 

National Forest Transportation System 

and prohibit cross country wheeled 

motorized vehicle travel by the public 

off the designated system. Once the 

decision is made, the Inyo National 

Forest will publish a Motor Vehicle Use 

Map (MVUM) identifying the roads, 

trails and areas that are designated for 

motor vehicle use. The MVUM shall 

specify the classes of vehicles and, if 

appropriate, the times of year for which 

use is designated. 

Scoping Process 

Public participation will be especially 

important at several points during the 

analysis. The Forest Service will be 

seeking information, comments, and 

assistance from the federal, state, and 

local agencies and other individuals or 

organizations who may be interested in 

or affected by the proposed action. 

The Notice of Intent is expected to be 

published in the Federal Register on 

October 1, 2007. The common period on 

the proposed action will extend 45 days 

from the date the Notice of Intent is 

published in the Federal Register. 

The draft environmental impact 

statement is expected to be filed with 

the Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) and to be available for public 

review in March 2008. EPA will publish 

a notice of availability of the draft EIS 

in the Federal Register. The comment 

period on the draft EIS will extend 45 

days from the date the EPA notice 

appears in the Federal Register. At that 

time, copies of the draft EIS will be 

distributed to interested and affected 

agencies, organizations, and members of 

the public for their review and 

comment. It is very important that those 

interested in the management of the 

Inyo National Forest participate at that 

time. 

The final EIS is scheduled to be 

completed in October 2008. In the final 

EIS, the Forest Service will respond to 

comments received during the 45-day 

comment period that pertain to the 

environmental consequences discussed 

in the draft EIS and applicable laws, 

regulations, and policies considered in 

making the decision. Submission of 

comments in response to the draft EIS 

is a prerequisite for eligibility to appeal 

under the 36 CFR part 215 regulations. 

Comment Requested 

This notice of intent initiates the 

scoping process which guides the 

development of the environmental 

impact statement. 

Early Notice of Importance of Public 

Participation in Subsequent 

Environmental Review: A draft 

environmental impact statement will be 

prepared for comment. The comment 

period on the draft environmental 

impact statement will be 45 days from 

the date the Environmental Protection 

Agency publishes the notice of 

availability in the Federal Register. 

The Forest Service believes, at this 

early stage, it is important to give 

reviewers notice of several court rulings 

related to public participation in the 

environmental review process. First, 

reviewers of draft environmental impact 

statements must structure their 

participation in the environmental 

review of the proposal so that it is 

meaningful and alerts an agency to the 

reviewer’s position and contentions. 

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. 

NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also, 

environmental objections that could be 

raised at the draft environmental impact 

statement stage but that are not raised 

until completion of the final 

environmental impact statement may be 

waived or dismissed by the courts. City 

of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 

1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin 

Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 

1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of 

these court rulings, it is very important 

that those interested in this proposed 

action participate by the close of the 45 

day comment period so that substantive 

comments and objections are made 

available to the Forest Service at a time 

when it can meaningfully consider them 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 189 / Monday, October 1, 2007 / Notices 55741 

1Or the next business day, if the deadline falls 

on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day 

when the Department is closed. 

and respond to them in the final 

environmental impact statement. 

To assist the Forest Service in 

identifying and considering issues and 

concerns on the 

To assist Forest Service in identifying 

and considering issues and concerns on 

the proposed action, comments on the 

draft environmental impact statement 

should be as specific as possible. It is 

helpful if the comments refer to specific 

pages or chapters of the draft 

environmental impact statement. 

Comments may also address the 

adequacy for the draft environmental 

impact statement or the merits of the 

alternatives formulated and discussed in 

the statement. Reviewers may wish to 

refer to the Council on Environmental 

Quality Regulations for implementing 

the procedural provisions of the 

National Environmental Policy Act at 40 

CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points. 

Comments received, including the 

names and addresses of those who 

comment, will be considered part of the 

public record on this proposal and will 

be available for public inspection. 

(Authority; 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; 

Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section 

21) 

Dated: September 24, 2007. 

Marlene Finley, 

Acting Forest Supervisor, Inyo National 

Forest. 

[FR Doc. 07–4774 Filed 9–28–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–M 

DEPARTMENT OF ARCTIC RESEARCH 

COMMISSION 

Arctic Research Commission 

[Docket No. USARC 07–081] 

Notice of Meeting 

September 14, 2007. 

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. 

Arctic Research Commission will hold 

its 84th meeting in Nome, AK on 

October 8–9, 2007. the Business 

Session, open to the public, will 

convene at 9 a.m. Monday, October 8, 

2007 in Nome, AK. An Executive 

Session will follow adjournment of the 

Business Session. 

The Agenda items include: 

(1) Call to order and approval of the 

Agenda. 

(2) Approval of the Minutes of the 

83rd Meeting. 

(3) Reports from Congressional 

Liaisons. 

(4) Agency Reports. 

The focus of the meeting will be 

reports and updates on programs and 

research projects affecting the Arctic. 

Any person planning to attend this 

meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary 

aids, such as sign language interpreters, 

must inform the Commission in advance 

of those needs. 

Contact Person for More Information: 

John Farrell, Executive Director, US 

Arctic Research Commission 703–525–

0111 or TDD 703–306–0090. 

John Farrell, 

Executive Director. 

[FR Doc. 07–4830 Filed 9–28–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555–01–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity to Request 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sheila E. Forbes, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Unit, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230, 

telephone: (202) 482–4697. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Each year during the anniversary 

month of the publication of an 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspension of 

investigation, an interested party, as 

defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, may request, 

in accordance with section 351.213 

(2002), that the Department conduct an 

administrative review of that 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspended 

investigation. 

Opportunity to Request a Review: 

Not later than the last day of October 

20071, interested parties may request 

administrative review of the following 

orders, findings, or suspended 

investigations, with anniversary dates in 

October for the following periods: 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings Period 

BRAZIL: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod.

A–351–832 ................................................................................................................................................................. 10/1/06 - 9/30/07 

CANADA: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod.

A–122–840 ................................................................................................................................................................. 10/1/06 - 9/30/07 

INDONESIA: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod.

A–560–815 ................................................................................................................................................................. 10/1/06 - 9/30/07 

ITALY: Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape.

A–475–059 ................................................................................................................................................................. 10/1/06 - 9/30/07 

MEXICO: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod.

A–201–830 ................................................................................................................................................................. 10/1/06 - 9/30/07 

MOLDOVA: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod.

A–841–805 ................................................................................................................................................................. 10/1/06 - 9/30/07 

REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Polyvinyl Alcohol.

A–580–850 ................................................................................................................................................................. 10/1/06 - 9/30/07 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Barium Carbonate.

A–570–880 ................................................................................................................................................................. 10/1/06 - 9/30/07 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Barium Chloride.

A–570–007 ................................................................................................................................................................. 10/1/06 - 9/30/07 

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Helical Spring Lock Washers.

A–570–822 ................................................................................................................................................................. 10/1/06 - 9/30/07 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES