alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:06-cv-15129-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15129-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15129-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15129-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15129-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15129-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15129-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15129-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15129-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15129-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15129-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15129-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15129-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-16 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Global Precision Medical Inc. (the Company) on Form 10K-SB/Amendment No. 1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lindsay Semple, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|By: | /s/ Lindsay Semple                                                                        
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | Lindsay Semple
Chief Executive Officer & Acting Chief Financial Officer
September 23, 2005
#### Percy W. Steele, Plaintiff, v State Board of Equalization & Assessment, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Fulton County,

October 31,1986

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Joseph T. Wilkinson*for plaintiff. *Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Steven H. Schwartz*of counsel), for defendant.

OPINION OF THE COURT

James N. White, J.

The plaintiff in this proceeding is seeking a declaration that RPTL 310 (5) and (10) and the regulations enacted thereunder are unconstitutional.

With the enactment of section 310, the Legislature requires that an assessor possess basic minimum knowledge and skills pertaining to the assessment of real property. To insure compliance with this requirement, RPTL 310 (5) provides that a person who is appointed or elected to the office of assessor after November 1, 1982, shall, within one year after the commencement of his term, be certified as having met the prescribed educational and training requirements. In the event he is not certified, the State Board of Equalization and *821Assessment can, after a hearing, declare the office of an elected assessor vacant (RPTL 310 [5] [c]).

In this instance, plaintiff was elected assessor of the Town of Broadalbin in November 1983. Thereafter, on October 9, 1985, a hearing was held to determine whether he had complied with the training requirements established by section 310 (10) and the regulations (9 NYCRR part 188). The Hearing Officer found that he had not and recommended that plaintiff’s office be declared vacant. The finding and recommendation were accepted by the State Board of Equalization and Assessment on June 18, 1986. This proceeding ensued.

It is well settled that when the Legislature establishes a public office, like an assessor’s *(see, Rubino v City of Mount Vernon,*563 F Supp 907 [US Dist Ct, SD NY]), it may prescribe qualifications for holding that office *(see,*18 NY Jur 2d, Civil Servants, § 30). The only limitation on its power is that the qualifications it establishes must have a rational basis, such as age, integrity, training, or, perhaps, residence *(see, Landes v Town of N. Hempstead,*20 NY2d 417, 420; 63A Am Jur 2d, Public Officers and Employees, § 37). Since an assessor plays a pivotal role in the taxation process, it is imperative that he be familiar with the various assessment theories and procedures. Accordingly, the court finds that the qualifications for the office of assessor established in RPTL 310 have a rational basis. Based on that finding, the court will issue a declaration that RPTL 310 (5) and (10) and the regulations enacted thereunder (9 NYCRR part 188) are constitutional.
#### LEASING, INC. v. DAN-CLEVE CORP.

No. 40 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 634.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 March 1977.
Case 1:07-cv-03478-AKH Document 12 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03478-AKH Document 12 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03478-AKH Document 12 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 11

11. Statement re computation of per share earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    FIRST QUARTER ENDED     FIRST QUARTER ENDED
                                                     DECEMBER 31, 2000       DECEMBER 31, 1999
                                                     -----------------       -----------------

<S>                                                        <C>                      <C>
Net income in thousands                                     $     6,901             $     3,510


Weighted average shares outstanding                          15,574,631              14,188,578

Assumed exercise of stock options,
  weighted average of incremental shares                        908,897               1,040,244

Assumed purchase of stock under stock
  purchase plan, weighted average                                87,181                  62,636
                                                                 ------                  ------

Diluted shares - adjusted weighted-average
 shares and assumed conversions                              16,570,709              15,291,458
                                                             ==========              ==========


Basic earnings per share                                    $      0.44             $      0.25

Diluted earnings per share                                  $      0.42             $      0.23
</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 1 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 2 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 3 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 4 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 5 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 6 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 7 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 8 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 9 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 10 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 11 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 12 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 13 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 14 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 15 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 16 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 17 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 18 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 19 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 20 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 21 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 22 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 23 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 24 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 25 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 26 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 27 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 28 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 29 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 30 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 31 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 32 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 33 of 34
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-20 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 34 of 34
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 30, 2023.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 30, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24D0141. GA BIOSCIENCE RESEARCH, INC. v. GEORGIA ACCESS TO MEDICAL 

CANNABIS COMMISSION et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2023CV383107
#### STATE v. JONES

No. 7 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 467.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 25 August 1975.
**Exhibit 10.10**

**EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TERM SHEET**

The Compensation Committee for Vision Bancshares, Inc. met onJanuary 11, 2005, unanimously making the following recommendations which were approved by the Company’s Board of Directors at its regular meeting on January 31, 2005: J. Daniel Sizemore, Chairman and CEO, received a salary increase of$36,500 for a total annual compensation of $275,000 and William E. Blackmon, CFO received a salary increase of $10,000 for a total annual compensation of $131,900. Robert S. McKean, President, Vision Bank (Alabama), received a one time bonus in theamount of $16,700 in lieu of an annual salary increase. 

Incentive bonuses were approved for the following executive officers of theCompany and its subsidiaries: J. Daniel Sizemore, Chairman and CEO, $78,705; William E. Blackmon, CFO, $40,227; Robert S. McKean, President, Vision Bank (Alabama), $45,375; and Joey W. Ginn, President, Vision Bank (Florida), $17,025. 

Stock options were granted, effective January 31, 2005, under the Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan to the following executive officers ofCompany and its subsidiaries: J. Daniel Sizemore, Chairman and CEO, was granted 4,000 shares; William E. Blackmon, CFO, was granted 2,500 shares; Robert S. McKean, President, Vision Bank (Alabama), was granted 2,500 shares; and Joey W. Ginn,President, Vision Bank (Florida), was granted 2,500 shares. These options were granted at a strike price of $27.75 per share, were 100% vested at the date of grant and expire ten years from the date of grant. 

Stock options were granted, effective January 31, 2005, under the Director Stock Option Plan. Each non-employee director of Vision Bancshares, Inc.was granted 2,500 shares. These options were granted at a strike price.
#### STATE v. CLAY

No. 98 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 118.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 December 1975.
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-12 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-12 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-12 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-12 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-12 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-12 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-12 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-12 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 38-12 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 9 of 9
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF WILLIAM LYON HOMES, A DELAWARE CORPORATION**

William Lyon Homes 

(formerly The Presley Companies) (a Delaware corporation) 

Presley Homes 

(a California corporation) 

California Equity Funding, Inc. 

(a California corporation) 

Sycamore CC, Inc. 

(a California corporation) 

Presley CMR, Inc. 

(a California corporation) 

Duxford Financial, Inc. (formerly Presley Mortgage Company) 

(a California corporation) 

Bayport Mortgage, L.P. 

(a California limited partnership)

Duxford Title Reinsurance Company 

(a Vermontcorporation) 

PH—LP Ventures 

(aCalifornia corporation) 

PH-Rielly Ventures, Inc. 

(a California corporation) 

Silver Creek Preserve 

(a California corporation) 

HSP, Inc. 

(a California corporation) 

PH Ventures-San Jose 

(a California corporation) 

Cerro Plata Associates, LLC

(a Delaware limited liability company) 

HenryRanch, LLC 

(a Delaware limited liability company) 

William Lyon Southwest, Inc. 

(an Arizona corporation) 

PLC/Lyon Waterfront Residential, LLC 

(a Delaware limited liability company) 

Lyon Waterfront, LLC 

(a Delaware limited liability company) 

Tustin Villas Partners, LLC 

(a Delaware limited liability company) 

Tustin Vistas Partners, LLC 

(a Delaware limited liability company) 

Marble MountainPartners, LLC 

(a Delaware limited liability company) 

East Garrison Partners I, LLC 

(a California limited liability company) 

Lyon East Garrison Company I, LLC 

(a California limitedliability company) 

Spectrum 90 Investors, LLC 

(a Delaware limited liability company) 

4S Ranch Planning Area 38, LLC 

(a Delaware limited liability company) 

San Miguel Village ,LLC 

(a Delaware limited liability company) 

Lyon Treviso, LLC 

(a Delaware limited liability company) 

Covenant Hills P-30B, LLC 

(a Delaware limited liability company) 

WLH Enterprises (formerly The Ranch Golf Club Co. which was formerly Carmel Mountain Ranch) 

(a California general partnership) 

Laguna Big Horn, LLC 

(a Delaware limited liability company) 

Mountain Falls, LLC

(a Nevada limited liability company) 

Mountain Falls Golf Course, LLC 

(a Nevada limited liability company) 

Whitney Ranch Village 5, LLC 

(a Delaware limited liabilitycompany) 

Queen Creek Joint Venture, LLC 

(anArizona limited liability company) 

 

- 2 - 

Lyon Vista Del Mar 533, LLC 

(a Delaware limited liability company) 

Circle G at the Church Farm North Joint Venture, LLC 

(an Arizona limited liability company) 

WLH/WB RainbowValley Properties JV, LLC 

(an Arizona limited liability company) 

Duxford Insurance, LLC 

(a California limited liability company) 

Moffet Meadows Partners, LLC 

(a Delaware Limited LiabilityCompany) 

Duxford Escrow, Inc. 

(a CaliforniaCorporation) 

Lyon Montecito, LLC. 

(aCalifornia Limited Liability Company) 

Nobar Water Company 

(a California Company) 

Tustin Coventry, LLC 

(a Delaware Limited Liability Company) 

 

- 3 -
Document

[NAME]






MARCH 15, 2017
PERFORMANCE UNITS  
AWARD LETTER






The Compensation and Management Succession Committee of the Company's Board of Directors has awarded you:




_______ Performance Units 
Award Period: January 1, 2017 – December 31, 2019 
Grant Date: March 15, 2017




These Performance Units are subject to the terms and conditions contained in the 2017 Performance Units Provisions (“Provisions”) set forth in Appendix A to this Award Letter. The Provisions contain terms and conditions regarding the payment of these Performance Units, termination of employment, tax withholding, non-solicitation of Company employees and customers, regulatory compliance and other matters, and I encourage you to read this document carefully.




Please retain these documents in your personal records.














__________________________________
John D. Johns
Chairman of the Board and Chief 
Executive Officer of Protective Life 
Corporation
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Global Precision
Medical Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Michel Coderre, President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|By: | /s/ Michel Coderre                                
|--- | --------------------------------------------------
|    | Michel Coderre
    President
    September 2, 2003
#### STATE v. VAIL

No. 171 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 73.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 25 August 1975.
#### POWER CO. v. CITY OF HIGH POINT

No. 6 PC.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 91.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 30 August 1974.
#### STATE v. PHILLIPS

No. 94 PC

Case below: 49 N.C. App.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 30 October 1980.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket Nos. 45088/45089

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

TORY ALLEN HOWARD ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2018 Unpublished Opinion No. 446

Filed: May 14, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Bannock County. Hon. Robert C. Naftz , District Judge.

Judgments of conviction and consecutive unified sentences of twenty

- two years, with a minimum period of confinement of seven years, for delivery of a controlled substance and twenty

- eight years, with a minimum period of confinement of eight years, for trafficking in heroin, affirmed

.
Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W. Reynolds

, Deputy Appel late Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
In consolidated cases, Tory Allen Howard was found guilty of one count of delivery of a

controlled substance , Idaho Code § 37

- 2732(a)(1)(A), and trafficking in heroin, I.C. § 37

- 2732B(a)(6)(A), both with persis tent violator enhancements, I.C. § 19

- 2514. The district court
imposed a unified sentence of twenty

- two years, with a minimum period of confinement of seven

years , for delivery and twenty

- eight years, with a minimum period of confinement of eight years,2 for trafficking

. The sentences were ordered to run consecutively. Howard appeals, contending

that his sentences are excessive.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 1 14, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Howard ’s judg ments of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
Exhibit 10.6


 








[TRANSLATION FROM HEBREW]


State of Israel


Energy Ministry


 


 


Oil & Gas


23 Adar 1 5769


28 February, 9


     Oil_321_2019       


To:


Mr. Dustin Guinn


Zion Oil & Gas Inc.


 


Greetings,


 


Re: License Extension to license "Megiddo-Jezreel"
/ 401 and Revision to work plan


Reference: Your letter of the 24th
and 26 of February 2019


 


In response to your referenced request I hereby
approve an extension to the "Megiddo-Jezreel" license / 401.up to December 2, 2020.This extension is up to the maximum
license period by law, and there will be no further extensions.


 


I note that at the end of the license period the
license shall expire and confidentiality shall not apply to information relating to the license pursuant to the Petroleum Law .


 


In addition, I also approve the updated work plan
as follows:


 


	Number	Activity description	Execution by:
	1	Submission of seismic survey plan to the Commissioner and execution of an agreement with a contractor to perform	30 April 2019
	2	Commence 3D seismic survey in an area of approximately 50 square kilometers	1 August 2019
	3	Transfer of field material configuration  and processed material to the Ministry pursuant to Ministry guidelines 	15 December  2019
	4	Submit interpretation report 	20 February 2019





 


Please note that you are required to comply with
all the provisions of the Petroleum Law, 5712-1952, and the regulations thereunder, including submission of all the reports detailed
in the Petroleum Law and in the Regulations.


 


Sincerely,


 


Yossi Wurtzburger


Petroleum Commissioner


 


Copy: Oil Unit
---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---
**Exhibit 10.8**

 

SYMYX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 

2006 CASH BONUS PLAN FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

TheSymyx Technologies, Inc. 2006 Cash Bonus Plan for Executive Officersprovides for an annual cash bonus target of up to 75% of an executive’s basesalary, with the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of SymyxTechnologies, Inc. (the “Company”) retaining authority, in its discretion,to increase the cash bonus to a total of 100% of an executive’s base salary,based upon the attainment by the Company of certain specified annual financialand other performance targets as well as certain non-financial factors relatedto the individual executive’s performance. The annual financial and othertargets for the program are set by the Compensation Committee and are based onthe Company’s overall financial performance, including revenue and operatingincome targets and other non-financial objectives.

 

Bonus payments will be made in one annual paymentshortly after the end of each calendar year.

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 15 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 15 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 15 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 3 of 3