alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 16, 2021

b0713 

# Order

Clerk July 16, 2021

161004 & (18)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 161004

COA: 350440

Wayne CC: 91

- 004698

- FC

ZEBADIAH MENDEL HOLLAND,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of July 28, 2020, the application for leave to appeal the January 16, 2020

order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pendin g the decision in People v

Manning (Docket No. 160034). On order of the Court, the case having been denied on

December 28, 2020, 506 Mich 1033 (2020), the application is again considered and, it

appearing to this Court that the case of People v Poole (Doc ket No. 161529) is pending on

appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in

the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in

ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case. The motion to remand remains pending.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-11202 (Summary Calendar)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EJOOR PATRICK EKWEREKWU,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (USDC No. 3:93-CR-270-H)

- - - - - - - - - - September 16, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ejoor Patrick Ekwerekwu a ppeals from his conviction and

sentence for conspiracy to import heroin. Ekwerekwu argues that he

was denied both his constitutional and his statutory right to a
speedy trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Because the district court extended the period for retrial

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(e ) and because Ekwerekwu’s retrial

commenced within the 180-day period, Ekwerekwu’s statutory right to2

a speedy trial was not violated. S ee United States v. Holley
, 986

F.2d 100, 103 (5th Cir.), cert. denied
, 510 U.S. 821 (1993).

Further, the five-month delay was not “presumptively prejudicial”

for purposes of Barker v. Wingo
, 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972). S ee

Robinson v. Whitley
, 2 F.3d 562, 567 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied
,
510 U.S. 1167 (1994). Accordingly, the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.
# CE2012247EN.01001301.xml

| 17.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 247/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 247/13

---

Thursday 24 March 2011Appointment of the executive director of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)

P7_TA(2011)0113

European Parliament resolution of 24 March 2011 on the appointment of the Executive Director of the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority)

2012/C 247 E/04

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the letter of 28 February 2011 from the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the letter of 28 February 2011 from the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority),

| — | having regard to Article 51(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 51(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) (1),

1

| — | having regard to the fact that, at its meeting of 17 March 2011, the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs heard the candidate selected by the Board of Supervisors of the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the fact that, at its meeting of 17 March 2011, the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs heard the candidate selected by the Board of Supervisors of the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority),

| — | having regard to Rule 120 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 120 of its Rules of Procedure,

| A. | whereas Verena Ross fulfils the criteria set out in Article 51(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010), |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas Verena Ross fulfils the criteria set out in Article 51(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010),

| 1. | Approves the appointment of Verena Ross as Executive Director of the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the appointment of Verena Ross as Executive Director of the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority);

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority).

---

(1)  OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 84.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7242

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RICKY MCKINLEY INGRAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:06-cr-00460-TDS-1)

Submitted: April 16, 2020 Decided: April 20, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis C. Allen, Federal Public Defender, Eric D. Placke, First Assistant Federal Public 

Defender, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, for Appellant. Matthew G.T. Martin, United States Attorney, Angela H. Miller, 

Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Through counsel, Ricky McKinley Ingram appeals the district court’s order denying 

his motion, filed pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 404, 132 

Stat. 5194, 5222, for a reduction in Ingram’s 262-month sentence. We have considered 

Ingram’s arguments on appeal in conjunction with the record and find the court did not 

abuse its discretion in declining to reduce Ingram’s custodial sentence. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ingram, No. 1:06-cr00460-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 21, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### PRESNELL v. PELL

No. 69 PC.

No. 38 (Fall Term).

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 538.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 1 May 1979.
#### STATE v. AIKENS

No. 155 PC.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 310.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 3 September 1974.
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 5 Filed 08/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 5 Filed 08/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-7 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-7 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-7 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-7 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-7 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-7 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-7 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 7 of 7
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    /s/ John B. Gerlach, Jr.John B. Gerlach, Jr.Chief Executive Officer February 9, 2009
 By:
    /s/ John L. BoylanJohn L. BoylanChief Financial Officer February 9, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1827 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1827

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude corporations 
   operating prisons from the definition of taxable REIT subsidiary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 2019

   Mr. Wyden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude corporations 
   operating prisons from the definition of taxable REIT subsidiary.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ending Tax Breaks for Private 
Prisons Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CORPORATIONS OPERATING PRISON FACILITIES FROM 
              DEFINITION OF TAXABLE REIT FACILITY.

    (a) In General.--Section 856(l)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) any corporation which--
                            ``(i) directly or indirectly operates or 
                        manages a lodging facility or a health care 
                        facility, or
                            ``(ii) directly or indirectly operates or 
                        manages a prison facility or provides services 
                        at or in connection with a prison facility, 
                        and'',
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``any lodging facility 
        or health care facility'' and inserting ``any lodging facility, 
        health care facility, or prison facility'', and
            (3) by striking the last sentence and inserting the 
        following: ``Subparagraph (B) shall not apply to rights 
        provided to an eligible independent contractor to operate or 
        manage a lodging facility, a health care facility, or a prison 
        facility if such rights are held by such corporation as a 
        franchisee, licensee, or in a similar capacity and such lodging 
        facility, health care facility, or prison facility is either 
        owned by such corporation or is leased to such corporation from 
        the real estate investment trust.''.
    (b) Definition of Prison Facility.--Section 856(l)(4) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Prison facility.--The term `prison facility' 
                means any correctional, detention, or penal 
                facility.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
10 SLEEP TIPS FOR MINERS 

ENVIRONMENT 

Limit light exposure 

Limit your light exposure at least a few hours before sleep. Common sources of light include the sun, 

lamps, and electronic devices. Light has a natural alerting e ̃ect and regulates your internal clock. 

Darkening or blackout shades can help, especially for night-shift workers who sleep during the day. 

Keep the room cool and choose a comfortable bed 

Keeping the bedroom a cool but comfortable temperature and using a comfortable bed and pillow 

are critical for good sleep. Spend some time ÿnding a mattress and pillow best suited to you. 

Limit noise sources 

Limit sources of inconsistent and loud noises. Use a white noise machine to drown out unwanted 

background noises. A quiet bedroom improves sleep quality. 

HEALTH 

Get your 7–9 hours of sleep 

Plan on getting 7–9 hours of sleep consistently by scheduling your bedtime based on when you need 

to wake up. Su ̨cient sleep is important for good sleep health. 

Avoid big meals before bed 

Avoid large or heavy meals and spicy foods 2–3 hours before bed. Eating these before bed can make it 

di ̨cult to fall asleep and stay asleep. 

Exercise regularly 

Even walking and light stretching beneÿts your sleep quality and overall health. It also improves alertness. 

Do you snore? 

Although common, snoring can be a sign of a sleep disorder. Talk to your doctor if you snore or have 

other concerns about your sleep. 

CONSUMABLES 

Avoid ca ̃eine 

Stop consuming ca ̃eine 5–6 hours before sleep. Ca ̃eine can keep you awake many hours after 

consumption. Common sources of ca ̃eine include co ̃ee, energy drinks, and many teas and sodas. 

Refrain from alcohol 

Avoid alcohol at least four hours before bedtime. Alcohol makes it harder to maintain good quality 

sleep throughout the night. 

CHEW 

Avoid nicotine and tobacco products 

Avoid nicotine and tobacco products before bedtime. Nicotine and tobacco are stimulants and 

increase heart rate and alertness, making it di ̨cult to relax and get ready for sleep.
Exhibit 23.2


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-198576) and Form S-8 (No. 333-183465) of iStar Financial Inc. of our report dated February 20, 2015 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Marina Palms, LLC and Subsidiaries, appearing in Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of iStar Financial Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2014 .





/s/ Gerson, Preston, Robinson & Co., P.A.





Miami Beach, Florida


March 27, 2015
Case 1:06-cv-15010-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15139-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### ANDREWS v. PETERS

No. 33P82.

Case below: 55 N.C. App. 124.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 30 March 1982.
#### ROSE v. MOTOR SALES

No. 156 PC.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 494.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 4 February 1975.
NO. 07-09-0311-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	DECEMBER 14, 2009

	______________________________

	CLIFFORD FAIRFAX,

										Appellant

	v.

	PHYLLIS LARUE, NURSE PRACTITIONER, TEXAS

	DEPT. OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE - PAROLE DIVISION,

	W.P. (BILL) BATEN INTERMEDIATE SANCTION FACILITY,

										Appellees		_________________________________

	FROM THE 223RD DISTRICT COURT OF GRAY COUNTY;

	NO. 34,669; HONORABLE LEE WATERS, JUDGE

	_______________________________

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

			     _________________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

	Clifford Fairfax (appellant) filed a pro se notice of appeal seeking to contest the trial court’s order dismissing his mandamus proceeding.  We dismiss the appeal.  

	The clerk’s record was filed with this court on September 24, 2009, and a supplemental clerk’s record was filed on October 13, 2009.  There is no reporter’s record to file.  Thus, appellant’s brief fell due on November 12, 2009.  On October 21, 2009, he moved for extension of time to file his brief.  We granted the motion and informed appellant that his brief was due November 30, 2009.  So too was he notified in writing that no further extensions would be granted and that the failure to file his brief would result in the dismissal of his appeal for want of prosecution.  No brief has been received from him, and the November 30th deadline has lapsed.  And, instead of filing the requisite brief, he moved for another extension of the deadline.  The extension was purportedly needed so that the trial court could rule on a recently filed motion to reinstate his suit, a motion that we calculate to be untimely.  

	Appellant having failed to file his appellate brief as directed by this court and having failed to proffer any other acceptable reason for further extending the briefing deadline, we deny his motion and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b).

							Per Curiam
#### SHOPPING CENTER v. GLENN

No. 198 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 67.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 March 1979.
+ I am a wildland fire fighter.

+ I am at increased risk for rhabdomyolysis.

ATTENTION: HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention urges 

healthcare providers to be alert for rhabdomyolysis 

in wildland fire fighters. Check serial serum creatine 

phosphokinase (CPK or CK) levels when any of the following 

signs and symptoms are present: 

heat-related illness, dark urine, muscle 

pain, or exercise intolerance.

Emergency Contact Name and Phone:

Name: Phone:

Medical Condition(s) Current Medication(s) Allergies
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A1739. TYREEK THOMAS v. THE STATE.

Tyreek Thomas wassentenced as a first offender. Following a hearing, the trial

court revoked Thomas’s first offender status and entered a sentencing judgment. 

Thomas then filed this appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

Contrary to his assertion in his notice of appeal, Thomas was required to file

an application for discretionary appeal to obtain review in this Court because the

underlying subject matter of Thomas’s appeal is the revocation of his first offender

probation. Dean v. State, 177 Ga. App. 123,(338 SE2d 711) (1985) (OCGA § 5-6-35

(a) (5) applies to revocation of first offender status). His failure to do so deprives us

of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

June 05, 2020

06/05/2020
EX-10.5(d)





 Exhibit 10.5(d) 

June 1, 2019 
 Campbell & Company, L.P. 

2850 Quarry Lake Drive 
 Baltimore, MD 21209 

Attn: Mr. Thomas Lloyd 
 Re:
  Management Agreement Renewal 
 Dear Mr. Lloyd: 

We are writing with respect to your management agreement concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management
Agreement”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreement through June 30, 2020 and all other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain unchanged. 
  

	 	•	 	 Potomac Futures Fund L.P. 



Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of
Mr. Patrick T. Egan at 522 Fifth Avenue – 7th Floor, New York, NY 10036. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 212-296-6808. 

 

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	  	/s/ Patrick T.
Egan                                         
       
		  	Patrick T. Egan
		  	President and Director


			
	
	CAMPBELL & COMPANY, L.P.
		
	 By:
	  	/s/ Thomas P. Lloyd     /s/ Gabriel A. Morris
		
	Print Name:	  	Thomas P. Lloyd         Gabriel A. Morris     

 PE/tr
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 3 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 3 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 3 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,701,888
<SECURITIES>                                 2,582,475
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,496,982
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                 10,225,421
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,351,593
<PP&E>                                       4,105,447
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,137,533
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,319,507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,717,322
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       617,812
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,949,314
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,319,507
<SALES>                                     23,739,528
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,739,528
<CGS>                                       10,078,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,908,054
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (485,298)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,910
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                297,862
<INCOME-TAX>                                    99,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            198,862
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   198,862
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>