alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### W. D. GOLDSTON, JR., Administrator of the Estate of RICHARD GOLDSTON, Deceased v. CHARLES EDWIN WRIGHT.

(Filed 23 May 1962.)

1. Appeal and Error § 46; Trial § 48—

The action of the trial court in setting aside the verdict in its discretion is not subject to review in the absence of manifest abuse of discretion.

3. Appeal and Error § 3; Trial § 46.1—

When the trial court sets aside the verdict in its discretion and orders a new trial, the case remains on the civil issue docket for trial *de novo,*unaffected by rulings made during the trial, and therefore rulings during trial on motions to nonsuit are no longer pertinent, and the correctness of such rulings cannot be presented for review, there being no final judgment or interlocutory order from which an appeal can be taken.

Appeal by defendant from *Phillips, J.,*November 1961 Civil Term Of ROCKINGHAM.

Administrator’s action to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of an eight-year-old boy, who died as a result of injuries received when struck by an automobile driven by defendant.

Issues of negligence, contributory negligence, and damages were submitted to the jury, who answered the first issue (negligence), No. Whereupon, plaintiff moved the trial court to set aside the verdict. The court stated “this verdict shocks the conscience of the court,” and, in its discretion, set aside the verdict and ordered a new trial.

Defendant excepted and appealed.

*Brown, Scurry, McMichael & Griffin by Hugh P. Griffin, Jr., for defendant appellant.*

*Fagg, Vaughn, Harrington ■& Fagg by Thomas S. Harrington, and Jordan, Wright, Henson & Nichols by Luke Wright for plaintiff ap-pellee.*

PER Cubiam.

The rule is thoroughly established in this jurisdiction that when a trial court sets aside a verdict in its discretion, as here, its action in so doing is not subject to review by appeal to the Supreme Court, in the absence of a manifest abuse of discretion. *Walston v. Greene,*246 N.C. 617, 99 S.E. 2d 805; *Veazey v. Durham,*231 N.C. 357, 57 S.E. 2d 377; *Goodman v. Goodman,*201 N.C. 808; 161 S.E. 686; *Bird v. Bradburn,*131 N.C. 488, 42 S.E. 936; *Brink v. Black,*74 N.C. 329. The record discloses no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court. The appeal is without substance and will be dismissed. *Goodman v. Goodman, supra.*

Defendant assigns as error the denial by the trial court of his mo*280tion for a judgment of involuntary nonsuit made at the close of plaintiff’s evidence; defendant offered no evidence. This question is not presented. When the trial court, in its discretion, set aside the verdict, and ordered a new trial, the case remained on the civil issue docket for trial *de novo,*unaffected by rulings made therein during the trial conducted by Judge Phillips. *Gillikin v. Mason,*256 N.C. 533, 124 S.E. 2d 541. Defendant, in respect to the denial of his motion for a judgment of involuntary nonsuit, has nothing to appeal from, for the very simple reason that in this respect there is neither a final judgment nor any interlocutory order of the superior court affecting his rights. *Veazey v. Durham, supra;*G.S. 1-277-278.

Appeal dismissed.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Dominique de la Roche, Chief Financial Officer of Rockwell
Diamonds Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)          
The Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended May 31,
2007 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)          
The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:        /s/ D. de la Roche
            
____________________________________________Name:  Dominique de la
Roche Title:    Chief Financial Officer

Date: December 14, 2007

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A

signed original of this statement has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
40-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
#### HOFFMAN v. TRUCK LINES, INC.

No. 148 PC.

Now No. 89 PA 82.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 643.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 3 March 1982.
#### EGGIMANN v. BOARD OF EDUCATION

No. 50 P.C.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 459.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 24 September 1974.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 3.1(C)

                            CERTIFICATE OF MERGER OF

                             IVAX DIAGNOSTICS, INC.

                                  WITH AND INT0

                               B2BSTORES.COM, INC.

     Pursuant to the provisions of Title 8, Section 252 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law governing the merger of one or more domestic business
coporations with a foreign business corporation, the undersigned surviving
corporation hereby files this certificate of merger with the Secratary of State
of Delaware.

     FIRST: The names of the merging corporations are IVAX Diagnostics, Inc.,
which is a business corporation organized under the laws of the State of
Florida, and b2bstores.com, Inc., which is a business corporation organized
under the laws of the State of Delaware.

     SECOND: A merger agreement for merging IVAX Diagnostic, Inc., with and into
b2bstores.com, Inc., has been approved, adopted, certified, executed, and
acknowledged by each of said corporations.

     THIRD: The surviving corporation shall be b2bstores.com, Inc., but the name
of such surviving corporation shall be changed to IVAX Diagnostics, Inc.

     FOURTH: The Certificate of Incorporation of the surviving corporation shall
be the Certificate of Incorporation of b2bstores.com, Inc., but the First and
Fourth Articles shall be amended and restated as follows:

          "FIRST:   The name of the Corporation is IVAX Diagnostics, Inc."
           -----
                                       and

          "FOURTH:  The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation is
           ------
                    authorized to issue is 55,000,000 shares, which are to be
                    divided into two classes consisting of (i) 50,000,000 shares
                    of common stock, par value $.01 per share, and (ii)
                    5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.01 per
                    share, issuable in series as may be provided from time to
                    time by resolution of the Board of Directors."

     FIFTH: The executed merger agreement is on file at an office of the
surviving corporation located at 2140 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida 33127.

     SIXTH: A copy of the merger agreement will be furnished by the surviving
corporation, on request and without cost, to any stockholder of either
constituent corporation.

                                       1
<PAGE>

     SEVENTH: The authorized capital of constituent corporation which is not a
corporation of Delaware is as follows: IVAX Diagnostics, Inc. is authorized to
issue 30,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share.

     Executed on this 14th day of March 2001.

                                                     B2BSTORES.COM, INC.


                                   By: /s/ Richard Kandel,
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                           Richard Kandel, Chairman of the Board

                                       2
#### STATE v. CLARK

No. 46.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 81.

Appeal dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 19(3) of the Rules of this Court and Rule 3(b) of the Supplementary Rules of this Court, as interpreted in *In re Will of Adams,*268 N.C. 565, and *State v. Staten,*271 N.C. 600, 12 September 1974.
----

**EXHIBIT 1.03**

 

NUMBER: **382518 
BRITISHCOLUMBIA

 

CERTIFICATE

OF

CHANGE OF NAME
*COMPANY ACT

 

I Hereby Certify *that
 *
SAN ANTONIOS RESOURCES INC.

 

has this day changed its name to

 
**GLOBAL PRECISION MEDICAL INC.

 

                    [SEAL] *                                               Issued**under my hand at Victoria, British Columbia                                                                                                          on October 15, 2002
 *
/s/ J.S. Powell 

JOHN S. POWELL*Registrar of Companies*PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIACANADA*****
#### STATE v. McLEAN & McFAYDEN

No. 17 P 82.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 191.

Application by defendants for further review denied 3 March 1982.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Rahoul Sharan, the Chief Financial Officer of One Voice
Technologies, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of One Voice Technologies,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions
         about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
         of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
         evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
         registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
         quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
         or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting.

April 1, 2005

/s/ Rahoul Sharan
-----------------
Chief Financial Officer
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1734 

To amend the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 to allow the District 

of Columbia to receive Federal funding under such Act, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2019 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 to 

allow the District of Columbia to receive Federal funding 

under such Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flood Prevention Act 

5 of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1734 IS

1 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FOR FED2 ERAL FUNDING UNDER THE COASTAL ZONE 

3 MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1972. 

4 Section 304(4) of the Coastal Zone Management Act 

5 of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1453(4)) is amended by inserting ‘‘the 

6 District of Columbia,’’ after ‘‘the term also includes’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-03556-LTS Document 4 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03556-LTS Document 4 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. REID

No. 133 PC.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 217.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 February 1975.
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 1 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 2 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 3 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 4 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 5 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 6 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 7 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 8 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 9 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 10 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 11 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 12 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 13 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 14 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 15 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 16 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 17 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 18 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 19 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 20 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 21 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 22 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 23 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 24 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 25 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-35 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 26 of 26
EXHIBIT
(32)




CERTIFICATION
OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS*




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, each of the undersigned officers of La-Z-Boy
Incorporated (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that
the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 22,
2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Kurt L. DarrowKurt
      L. DarrowPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary
      15, 2011/s/ Louis M. Riccio, Jr.Louis
      M. Riccio, Jr.Senior
      Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary
      15, 2011




*The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
Exhibit 15.13





[LETTERHEAD OF MCDANIEL & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD.]




Consent of Independent Consultant







We consent to the reference to our firm in the form and context in which they appear in this Annual Report on Form 20-F, the inclusion of our reports herein, and to the incorporation by reference in any Registration Statement on Form F-3 and related Prospectus Supplements of CNOOC Limited for the registration of debt securities and guarantees previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.









MCDANIEL & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD.By:
/s/P. A. Welch, P. Eng.Name:
P. A. Welch, P. Eng.Title:
President & Managing Director






McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd.


2200, Bow Valley Square 3,


255 - 5 Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta,


T2P 3G6 Canada




April 22, 2015
Case 1:07-cv-03553-VM Document 9 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03553-VM Document 9 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### ERVIN CO. v. HUNT

No. 63 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 755.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 November 1975.
Case 7:07-cr-00374-CLB Document 26 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### IN RE DALE

No. 4 P.C.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 390.

Petition by respondent for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1979. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 February 1979.
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-40 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-40 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-40 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-40 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-40 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 5 of 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                         191,987
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,173,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                   231,050
<INVENTORY>                                 35,159,193
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,294,011
<PP&E>                                      12,992,468
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,453,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,810,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,200,947
<BONDS>                                     27,793,456
<COMMON>                                       143,873
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,823,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                54,810,602
<SALES>                                     15,697,592
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,324,262
<CGS>                                       12,565,971
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,770,423
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             220,002
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,583,883
<INCOME-TAX>                                   596,015
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            987,868
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   987,868
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .69
        























</TABLE>
#### STATE v. ZIMMERMAN

No. 142 PC.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 396.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 February 1975.
Exhibit 31.1

 

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Michael Willoughby, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of PFSweb, Inc.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this report;

 

 

Date: April 29, 2016

 

By: /s/ MICHAEL WILLOUGHBY

Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE v. PILKINGTON

No. 25PC

No. 153 (Fall Term)

Case below: 48 N.C. App. 431

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 7 October 1980.