alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LIHIHX:I £

Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 20-5 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 2
From: LUDMILA KIPCHAKBAEVA <kipchakbaeva@bsc.minsk.by>

Date: Sun, 22 Apr 200719:03:06

To:belarus@bearbulk.com

Cc:operations@miachart.com, Mark Seward <MSeward@bentleys.co.uk>

Subject: Re. Orhan Deval

Tony-SergelLudmila

Re. Orhan Deval

Pis kindly pass to Owners.

Charterers refer to the recent attendances on board which have been reviewed with all attending repair crews.

Since the first attendance of suez yard and tms the Master has prevented charterers from repairing the damage

required prior to sailing. We are advised at the Master's request quote are given only for "full" repairs as he made it

clear to those attending that nothing else would suffice

When Miachart as disponent Owner, finally clarified what needed to be done, charterers sought to again request

more limited quotes. Suez yard, in view oftime wasted were not prepared to requote. TMS were, quoting $7500.

In the meantime, the master / C/O have yet again notified the TMS representative that they require full repairs

onboard / in bolds and will not accept / sign for any partial repairs. Owners seem on the one hand to ask charterers to

repair and at the same time prevent them doing so. Accordingly it seems that the TMS intends to quit

In further mitigation charterers had requested two other firms to quote for the required repairs (pSEW as affiliated to

SCA, and UMM Elkoura as private firm which was attending another vessel to finish her minor repairs in

accordance with class requirements) but unfortunately when both firms attended onboard, they have been notified

with same by Master. Ie he will not allow the repairs demanded by miachart to be performed. Indeed the firms found

difficulties with Master in a way as he informed them about all the reported damages to be repaired and also

yesterday when the 2 firms re-attended to check on certain items for their calculations of materials and their

quotation; the Master refuse their stay onboard.

In short, the masters conduct (back as far as Kandla) and since the surveyors first boarded has been designed to, and

has certainly had the effect of, preventing charterers from trading the ship for her final voyage and prevented them

from repairing the ship

In light of the master's interference and conduct, which charterers consider repdudiatory, they have no alternative

but to accept that repudiation hereby. Charterers consider the charter at an end and should be guided accordingly.

brgds,

Ludmila

LONDON-4340932.1.DMSemark 6121107 6:45 PM

Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 20-5 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
15 – Awareness Letter of Deloitte & Touche LLP










October
28, 2009





North
American Galvanizing & Coatings, Inc.


5314
South Yale Avenue


Suite
1000


Tulsa,
Oklahoma 74135





We have
reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information
of North American Galvanizing & Coatings, Inc. and subsidiary for the
three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, as indicated in
our report
dated October 28, 2009; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion
on that information.





We are
aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, is incorporated
by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-133848 on Form S-8 and No.
333-61393 on Form S-3 of North American Galvanizing & Coatings, Inc. (formerly
Kinark Corporation).





We also
are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the
Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement
prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified
by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that
Act.











/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP





Tulsa,
Oklahoma
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.5



                   Certificate Furnished Under Section 906
                      Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Douglas H. Yaeger, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Laclede Gas Company, hereby certify that

    (a)  To the best of my knowledge, the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for
         the quarter ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

    (b)  To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the
         accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
         fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
         results of operations of Laclede Gas Company.


Date: July 22, 2003
      -------------



                            /s/ Douglas H. Yaeger
                            --------------------------------
                            Douglas H. Yaeger
                            Chairman of the Board, President
                            and Chief Executive Officer






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Laclede Gas Company and will be retained by Laclede Gas Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





<PAGE>
<PAGE>





                   Certificate Furnished Under Section 906
                      Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Barry C. Cooper, Chief Financial Officer of Laclede Gas Company, hereby
certify that

    (a)  To the best of my knowledge, the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for
         the quarter ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

    (b)  To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the
         accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
         fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
         results of operations of Laclede Gas Company.


Date: July 22, 2003
      -------------



                                  /s/ Barry C. Cooper
                                  -----------------------
                                  Barry C. Cooper
                                  Chief Financial Officer






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Laclede Gas Company and will be retained by Laclede Gas Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### CARDWELL v. WARE

No. 167 PC.

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 366.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 29 August 1978.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Enstar Group, Inc.
(the "Corporation") for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,
certifies that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.


/s/ Nimrod T. Frazer
--------------------------------
Nimrod T. Frazer
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002


<PAGE>

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Enstar Group, Inc.
(the "Corporation") for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.


/s/ Cheryl D. Davis
-------------------------------
Cheryl D. Davis
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Corporate
Taxes, and Secretary
August 14, 2002
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT HIEYM I B AUTISTA-LOPEZ, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 13-74249 Age n c y No. A089-591-615 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 20, 2016 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, TASHIM A, a nd NGUYEN, C irc uit Judge s. Hie ym i B a

utista -Lope z , a

native an d

c itiz e n of M e x ic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B o ard of Im

m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny i ng he r m otion to re m and. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for a b use of 

# FIL ED JAN 27 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).disc re tion thede nia l of a m o tion to re m and. Rome ro-Ruiz v . Muk ase y , 538 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th C ir. 2008). W e de ny the pe tition for re v ie w. The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion in de ny ing the m otion to re m and whe re B a utista -Lope z fa ile d

to de m o n strate tha

t the ne w e vide nc e she subm itte d would like ly have c ha nge d the outc om e of he r c a se . Se e Shin v . Muk ase y , 547 F.3d 1019, 1025 (9th C ir. 2008) (“ Alie n s who se e k to re m and or re ope n proc e e d ings to pursue re lie f be ar a

‘ he avy burde n’ of proving tha t, if proc e e d ings we re re o pe ne d , the ne w e vide nc e would like ly

c ha nge the re sult in the

c a s e .” (c ita

tion omitte d)). In light of this disposition, we do not re a c h B a

utista -Lope z ’ s re m a ining c onte ntions. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 3 - 7 4 2 4 9 2
#### STATE v. HANFORD and STATE v. MARTINDALE

No. 73 PC.

Case below: 16 N.C. App. 353.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 13 December 1972.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-17-00018-CV

Maria Hernandez, Appellant

v.

Antonio Hernandez, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-FM-14-001709, HONORABLE DARLENE BYRNE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s brief was due on May 19, 2017. On June 21, the Court notified appellant

that her brief was overdue and that a failure to file a proper motion for extension of time by July 3,

2017, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not

filed a brief or a motion for extension of time. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of

prosecution.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Field, and Bourland

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: July 28, 2017
1

Filed 8/26/15 P. v. Williams CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ANTWINE THEODORE WILLIAMS,

Defendant and Appellant. C078337

(Super. Ct. No. 09F03756)

Defendant Antwine Theodore Williams appeals from an order denying a petition

to recall his so

- called “three strikes” sentence, brought pursuant to the provisions of the

Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012, codified at Penal Code section 1170.126. 1 (See

Teal v. Superior Court (2014) 60 Cal.4th 595.)

Defendant’s petition to recall his sentence and for resentencing was denie d, the

commitment offense being robbery. (See §§ 211, 667.5, subd. (c)(9), 1170.126,

subd. (e)(1), 1192.7, subd. (c)(19).)

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.2

Counsel was appointed to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an

opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and req uesting this court to review the

record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. ( People v. Wende

(1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Counsel advised defendant of his right to file a supplemental

brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed,

and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination

of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more

favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION

The judgment (order) is affirmed.

RAYE , P. J.

We concur:

BLEASE , J.

NICHOLSON , J.
Case 1:07-cv-03501-PKL Document 5 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03501-PKL Document 5 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. McBRIDE

No. 262 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 378.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 October 1981.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (the Company) for the
period ended October 31, 2008, I, William A. Shumaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:



| | (1) | such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended October 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended October 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 12, 2008



/s/ William A. ShumakerWilliam A. ShumakerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
tme-ex434_403.htm



 

Exhibit 4.34

Debt Assignment and Offset Agreement

 

This Debt Assignment and Offset Agreement (this “Agreement”) is entered into by and among Hu Mn (Identification No. [], the “Transferor”), Gu Dejun (Identification No. [], the “Transferee”), and Tencent Music (Beijing) Co. Ltd. (“Tencent Music”) as of September 12, 2019:

 

Whereas: Hu Min and Gu Dejun entered into a Share Transfer Agreement (the “Share Transfer Agreement”) as of September 12, 2019, pursuant to which the Transferor shall transfer to Transferee 50% of equity interest held by him in Xizang Qiming Music Co., Ltd. (the “VIE Company”) (representing RMB 5 million in its registered capital, the “Target Equity”). According to the Share Transfer Agreement, the consideration of the Target Equity is RMB 5 million (the “Transfer Price”).

 

Whereas: the Transferor and Tencent Music entered into a Loan Agreement on February 8, 2018 (the “Loan Agreement”), pursuant to which Tencent Music shall provide a loan in the amount of RMB 5 million to the Transferor.  In this regard, the Transferor intends to transfer the RMB 5 million debt (“Loan”) under the Loan Agreement to the Transferee.

 

In view of above, the Parties have now reached into the following agreement:

 


	
1.
	
The Transferor agrees to transfer his obligation to pay the Loan to the Transferee, and the Transferee agrees to undertake the obligation to pay the Loan. As the consideration that the Transferee agrees to undertake the obligation to pay the Loan, the portion of the Transfer Price equal to the Loan that the Transferee shall pay to the Transferor, shall be deemed paid.  When this Agreement comes into effect, the Transferee shall replace the Transferor and become the borrower under the Loan Agreement and the Transferee shall pay the Loan pursuant to the Loan Agreement and fulfill other obligations under the Loan Agreement.




 


	
2.
	
Tencent Music, as the creditor of the Loan, hereby agrees the assignment of the Loan under Article 1 hereof.




 


	
3.
	
This agreement shall come into force automatically upon the effective date of the Share Transfer Agreement.




 

[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank and below are signature pages to this Agreement]

1

 



 

[This page is the signature page of Debt Assignment and Offset Agreement. There is no text on this page]

 

 

Hu MinGu Dejun

Signed:/s/ Hu MinSigned: /s/ Gu Dejun

 

 

 

 

 

Tencent Music (Beijing) Co. Ltd.

/s/ Seal of Tencent Music (Beijing) Co. Ltd.

 

Legal Representative (Signature): /s/ Yang Qihu

2
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




CUSIP No. 67612W108




AGREEMENT CONCERNING JOINT FILING

OF AMENDMENT NO. 10 TO SCHEDULE 13D




          The undersigned agree as follows:




          (i) each of them is individually eligible to use Schedule 13D to which this Exhibit is
attached, and such Schedule 13D is filed on behalf of each of them; and




          (ii) each of them is responsible for the timely filing of such Schedule 13D and any amendments
thereto, and for the completeness and accuracy of the information concerning such person contained
therein; but none of them is responsible for the completeness or accuracy of the information
concerning the other person making the filing, unless such person knows or has reason to believe
that such information is inaccurate.




          This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to
be an original, but all of which, taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument.




          Dated September 8, 2009




 









 









	 	 	 	 	 
	 	V. PREM WATSA

 	 
	 	/s/ V. Prem Watsa
 	 
	 
	 	1109519 ONTARIO LIMITED

 	 
	 	By  	/s/ V. Prem Watsa
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	V. Prem Watsa 	 
	 	 	Title:  	President 	 
	 
	 	THE SIXTY TWO INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ V. Prem Watsa
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	V. Prem Watsa 	 
	 	 	Title:  	President 	 
	 
	 	810679 ONTARIO LIMITED

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ V. Prem Watsa
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	V. Prem Watsa 	 
	 	 	Title:  	President 	 



 









 






	 	 	 	 	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	FAIRFAX FINANCIAL HOLDINGS LIMITED

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ V. Prem Watsa 	 
	 	 	Name:  	V. Prem Watsa 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 	 
	 
	 	FFHL GROUP LTD.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ V. Prem Watsa
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	V. Prem Watsa 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Vice President 	 
	 
	 	FAIRFAX INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Bradley P. Martin
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Bradley P. Martin 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Corporate Secretary 	 
	 
	 	TIG HOLDINGS, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ John J. Bator
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	John J. Bator 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer 	 



 









 






	 	 	 	 	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	TIG INSURANCE GROUP, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ John J. Bator
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	John J. Bator 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 	 
	 
	 	TIG INSURANCE COMPANY

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ John J. Bator
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	John J. Bator 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 	 
	 
	 	ORH HOLDINGS INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Bradley P. Martin
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Bradley P. Martin 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Vice President 	 
	 
	 	UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Paul W. Bassaline
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Paul W. Bassaline 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Vice President
#### STATE v. BUZZELLI

No. 61 PC.

Case below: 11 N.C. App. 52.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 30 July 1971.
71810 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

Revised Non-Foreign Overseas Per 

Diem Rates 

AGENCY: DoD, Per Diem, Travel and 

Transportation Allowance Committee. 

ACTION: Notice of revised non-foreign 

overseas per diem rates. 

SUMMARY: The Per Diem, Travel and 

Transportation Allowance Committee is 

publishing Civilian Person Per Diem 

Bulletin Number 242. This bulletin lists 

revisions in the per diem rates 

prescribed for U.S. Government 

employees for official travel in Alaska, 

Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the Northern 

Mariana Islands and Possessions of the 

United States. AEA changes announced 

in Bulletin Number 194 remain in effect. 

Bulletin Number 242 is being published 

in the Federal Register to assure that 

travelers are paid per diem at the most 

current rates. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 1, 2005. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

document gives notice of revisions in 

per diem rates prescribed by the Per 

Diem Travel and Transportation 

Allowance Committee for non-foreign 

areas outside the continental United 

States. It supersedes Civilian Personnel 

Per Diem Bulletin Number 241. 

Distribution of Civilian Personnel Per 

Diem Bulletins by mail was 

discontinued. Per Diem Bulletins 

published periodically in the Federal 

Register now constitute the only 

notification of revisions in per diem 

rates to agencies and establishments 

outside the Department of Defense. For 

more information or questions about per 

diem rates, please contact your local 

travel office. The text of the Bulletin 

follows: 

Dated: November 23. 2005. 

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, DoD. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 / Notices 71811 


EN30no05.072</GPH>
71812 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 / Notices 


EN30no05.073</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 / Notices 71813 


EN30no05.074</GPH>
71814 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 05–23482 Filed 11–29–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001—06–C 


EN30no05.075</GPH>
#### STATE v. BROWN

No. 74 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 548.

Application by defendant for further review denied 1 May 1979.