alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. GRIFFITH

No. 10 PC.

Case below: 24 N.C. App. 250.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 March 1975.
**Exhibit 12.1**  **12.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to    Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**  I, Fulvio    Conti, certify that:          1.     I have reviewed this annual report on    Form 20-F/A    of Enel S.p.A;      2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact    necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;      3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other    financial information included in this report, fairly present in    all material respects the financial condition, results of    operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the    periods presented in this report.      Date:  November 13, 2007 /s/  Fulvio    Conti    Fulvio Conti    Chief Executive Officer
Case 1:06-cv-14978-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 2 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 3 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 4 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 5 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 6 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 7 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 8 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 9 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 10 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 11 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 12 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 13 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 14 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 15 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 16 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 17 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 18 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 19 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 20 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 21 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 22 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 23 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 24 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 25 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 26 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 27 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 28 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 29 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 30 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 31 of 31
|                            |                                                                                                                       |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|                            |                                                                                                                                                      |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|        |                                |                                       |
|--------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Dated:   February 4, 2011 | /s/CRAIG E. LaBARGE                   |
|   |                           | Craig E. LaBarge                      |
|   |                           | Chairman of the Board,                |
|   |                           | Chief Executive Officer and President |
#### STATE v. MURPHY

No. 1 PC.

Case below: 38 N.C. App. 118.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 March 1979.
United States District Court

Southern District of New York

Office of the Clerk

U.S. Courthouse

500 Pearl Street, New York, N.Y. 10007-1213

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X

 NEIL L. SCLATER-BOOTH

 V.

 SCOR S.A.

 

 

 ASSIGNMENT OF A 

 CIVIL CASE AS 

 RELATED 

07-CV-3346

 

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X 

 

Pursuant to the memorandum of the Case Processing Assistant, the above-entitled

action is reassigned to the calendar of

JUDGE LYNCH

 

All future documents submitted in this action are to be presented in the Clerk’s Office

of the Southern District Court for filing and shall bear the assigned judge’s initials after the

case number.

The attorney(s) for the plaintiff(s) are requested to serve a copy of the Notice of

Reassignment on all defendants. 

J. Michael McMahon, CLERK

Dated: 5/16/07

By: JULIAANN SCHEIB

 Deputy Clerk 

Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 7 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
 

 

cc: Attorneys of Record 

PS REASSIGNMENT FORM 

Data Quality Control Revised: March 9, 2001

Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 7 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       183,410,906
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   3,747,385
<MORTGAGE>                                  14,207,837
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             210,207,957
<CASH>                                       2,411,439
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             142,194
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      27,017,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             271,276,066
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            198,669,165
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         17,102,632
<POLICY-OTHER>                               1,729,899
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,829,851
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       843,346
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,798,521
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               271,276,066
<PREMIUMS>                                  20,338,601
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          6,850,593
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              78,916
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 368,553
<BENEFITS>                                   9,050,436
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     30,110
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        16,818,602
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,737,515
<INCOME-TAX>                                   449,725
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,287,790
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                358,600
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   929,190
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### HAMEL v. WIRE CORP.

No. 36 PC.

Case below: 12 N.C. App. 199.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 October 1971.
#### IN RE CONSTRUCTION OF HEALTH CARE FACILITY

No. 55P82.

Case below: 55 N.C. App. 313.

Petition by Wilkesboro Limited for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 30 March 1982.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000057497
<NAME> THE LAMSON & SESSIONS CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                             703
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,237
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     43,593
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,206
<PP&E>                                         115,565
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,668
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,422
<BONDS>                                         44,843
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,344
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   171,466
<SALES>                                         67,198
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,198
<CGS>                                           51,746
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,601
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 827
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,024
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (700)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,724
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,724
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.20
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 23.1


The Board of Directors
ARTISTdirect, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-53208, No. 333-38104, No. 333-63572 and No. 68396) on Forms S-8 of
ARTISTdirect, Inc., of our report dated April 6, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheet of ARTISTdirect, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity (deficiency) and cash flows for the
year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 Annual Report on
Form 10-K of ARTISTdirect, Inc.

Our report indicates a change in method of accounting for the company's
investment in its record label joint venture, ARTISTdirect Records, LLC.

Our report dated April 6, 2004 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has incurred substantial operating losses and negative cash
flows from operations to date, has funding commitments related to its record
label joint venture and needs additional capital to fund its operations and the
operations of the record label joint venture, which raises substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
that uncertainty.

/s/ GUMBINER, SAVETT, FINKEL, FINGLESON & ROSE, INC.





Santa Monica, California
May 12, 2004
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 20

- 00055

- CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 211th District Court

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. F18

- 3005

- 211

Before Womack , J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Wallach , J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### J OHN 

### D AVIS 

### III

, Appellant

V



### .

T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Appellant has moved to dismiss his appeal. Because we have not yet decided

this case, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a),

43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: November 19, 2020
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 26, 2010

p0719 

# Order

July 26, 2010

140731

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140731 COA: 287085 Shiawassee CC: 08-006622-FH STEVEN LOY LOCKWOOD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 2, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 99.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In  connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10KSB for the year ended  December  31, 2002 (the  "Report") by Elution Technologies, Inc. (formerly Nostalgia Motorcars, Inc.), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



1.   The Report complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and



2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  the operations of Registrant.





Dated:  May 15, 2003

/s/ Thomas Kreitzer

Name: Thomas Kreitzer

Title: Chief Executive Officer





/s/  Thomas Kreitzer

Name:  Thomas Kreitzer

Title: Principal Accounting Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ David V. Singer
    
    /s/ Rick D. PuckettDavid V. Singer
    
    Rick D. PuckettPresident and Chief
    
    Executive Vice President,Executive Officer
    
    Chief Financial Officer,November 2, 2007
    
    Treasurer and SecretaryNovember 2, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.2

\
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Global Entertainment
Holdings/Equities, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Clinton H. Snyder, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                              /s/ Clinton H. Snyder
Dated: September 2, 2005                     -----------------------
                                              Clinton H. Snyder
                                              Chief Financial Officer

This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent as shall be expressly set forth by
specific reference in such filing.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of Global Precision Medical Inc. (the Company) on Form 10K-SB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lindsay Semple, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   By:/s/ Lindsay SempleLindsay Semple
Chief Executive Officer & Acting Chief Financial Officer
March 12, 2007
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1881 

To provide PreCheck to certain severely injured or disabled veterans, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2019 

Mr. YOUNG (for himself and Ms. DUCKWORTH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To provide PreCheck to certain severely injured or disabled 

veterans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Expedited 

5 TSA Screening Safe Travel Act’’ or the ‘‘VETS Safe 

6 Travel Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1881 IS

1 SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY OF PRECHECK PROGRAM TO CER2 TAIN SEVERELY INJURED OR DISABLED VET3 ERANS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 44927 of title 49, United 

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(g) AVAILABILITY OF PRECHECK PROGRAM TO

8 CERTAIN SEVERELY INJURED OR DISABLED VET9 ERANS.— 

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—A veteran described in 

11 paragraph (2) is eligible for security screening under 

12 the PreCheck Program under section 44919 at no 

13 cost to the veteran if the veteran is able to meet the 

14 background check and other security requirements 

15 for participation in the program. 

16 ‘‘(2) VETERANS DESCRIBED.—A veteran de17 scribed in this paragraph is a veteran determined by 

18 the Secretary of Veterans Affairs— 

19 ‘‘(A)(i) to have had a loss, or loss of use, 

20 of a limb; 

21 ‘‘(ii) to have become paralyzed or partially 

22 paralyzed; or 

23 ‘‘(iii) to have incurred permanent blind24 ness; and 

25 ‘‘(B) as a result of that loss, paralyzation 

26 or partial paralyzation, or blindness, to require 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 1881 IS

1 the use of a wheelchair, prosthetic limb, or 

2 other assistive device to aid with mobility.’’. 

3 (b) COORDINATION ON IMPLEMENTATION.—Not later 

4 than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

5 the Administrator of the Transportation Security Admin6 istration and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall joint7 ly— 

8 (1) develop and implement a process for pro9 viding the Transportation Security Administration 

10 with access to the data needed to validate the eligi11 bility of a veteran for the PreCheck Program under 

12 section 44927(g) of title 49, United States Code, as 

13 added by subsection (a); and 

14 (2) submit to Congress a report on the status 

15 of implementing the process required by paragraph 

16 (1). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Order entered April 8, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 12

- 01 506

- CR

THERON WAYNE JOHNSON

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380 th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Co urt Cause No. 380

- 82005

- 2011



### O RDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any

other reason.

• The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect.

• If the trial court determines that appellant desires to pro secute the appeal, it shall next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it sha ll determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal.• The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can

be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a supplemental record, containing the written

findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Cour t within THIRTY

DAYS of the date of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It shall be

reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is received,

whichever is earlier.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE