Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 2, 2007 / Notices 56047 

data from eight states. FNS proposes to 

conduct four data collection activities: 

Interviews with State CN and Medicaid 

agencies; survey of LEAs; administrative 

data collection from LEAs and State 

agencies; and telephone interviews with 

LEAs. Without the data FNS will not be 

able to assess the effectiveness of NSLP 

direct verification, and FNS will not be 

able to disseminate information about 

DV–M implementation to assist agencies 

that do not currently use DV–M. 

Description of Respondents: State, 

Local, or Tribal Government. 

Number of Respondents: 364. 

Frequency of Responses: 

Recordkeeping; Report: Annually. 

Total Burden Hours: 379. 

Ruth Brown, 

Departmental Information Collection 

Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. E7–19439 Filed 10–1–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–30–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Agricultural Marketing Service 

[Docket No. AMS–FV–07–0120; FV–07–331] 

Notice of Request for Extension and 

Revision of a Currently Approved 

Information Collection 

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, 

USDA. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. Chapter 35), this notice 

announces the intention of the 

Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) to 

request an extension for and revision to 

a currently approved information 

collection in support of the Regulations 

Governing Inspection and Certification 

of Processed Fruits and Vegetables and 

Related Products. 

DATES: Comments may be submitted on 

or before December 3, 2007. 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR COMMENTS: 

Contact Terry B. Bane, Processed 

Products Branch, Fruit and Vegetable 

Programs, Agricultural Marketing 

Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 

STOP 0247, 1400 Independence 

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–

0247; fax (202) 690–1527; or e-mail 

‘‘terry.bane@usda.gov’’. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: ‘‘Regulations Governing 

Inspection and Certification of 

Processed Fruits and Vegetables and 

Related Products—7 CFR 52’’. 

OMB Number: 0581–0123. 

Expiration Date of Approval: February 

29, 2008. 

Type of Request: Extension and 

revision of a currently approved 

information collection. 

Abstract: The Agricultural Marketing 

Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621—et seq.) 

(AMA) directs and authorizes the 

Department to develop standards of 

quality, grades, grading programs, and 

other services to facilitate trading of 

agricultural products and assure 

consumers of quality products which 

are graded and identified under USDA 

programs. Section 203(h) of the AMA 

specifically directs and authorizes the 

Secretary of Agriculture to inspect, 

certify, and identify the grade, class, 

quality, quantity, and condition of 

agricultural products under such rules 

and regulations as the Secretary may 

prescribe, including assessment and 

collection of fees for the cost of the 

service. The regulations for such 

services for processed fruits and 

vegetables and related products may be 

found at 7 CFR Part 52. 

AMS also provides other types of 

voluntary services under the same 

regulations, e.g., contract and 

specification acceptance services, 

facility assessment services and 

certifications of quantity and quality. 

Grading services are available on a 

resident basis or a lot-fee basis. 

Respondents may request resident 

service on a continuous basis or on an 

as-needed basis. The service is paid for 

by the user (user-fee). The AMA and 

these regulations do not mandate the 

use of these services; they are provided 

only to those entities that request or 

apply for a specific service. 

In order for the Agency to satisfy 

those requests for service, the Agency 

must request certain information from 

those who apply for service. The 

information collected is used only by 

Agency personnel and is used to 

administer services requested by the 

respondents. The information request 

requires personal data, such as, name of 

the product, name and address of the 

packer or plant, location of the product, 

type and size of containers, and 

designation of services requested. 

Affected public may include any 

partnership, association, business trust, 

corporation, organized group, and State, 

County or Municipal government, and 

any authorized agent that has a financial 

interest in the commodity involved and 

requests service. 

Estimate of Burden: Public reporting 

burden for this collection of information 

is estimated to average 0.05 hours per 

response (1124 total hours divided by 

21,068 total annual responses). 

Respondents: Applicants who are 

applying for grading and inspection 

services. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

1,437. 

Estimated Number of Responses: 

21,068. 

Estimated Number of Responses per 

Respondent: 0.07. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden on 

Respondents: 1,124. 

Comments are invited on: (1) Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; (3) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (4) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on those who are to respond, including 

the use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

Comments may be sent to Mr. Terry B. 

Bane, Processed Products Branch, Fruit 

and Vegetable Programs, Agricultural 

Marketing Service, U.S. Department of 

Agriculture, STOP 0247, 1400 

Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20250–0247; fax (202) 

690–1527; or e-mail 

‘‘terry.bane@usda.gov’’. 

All comments received will be 

available for public inspection during 

regular business hours at the same 

address. 

All responses to this notice will be 

summarized and included in the request 

for OMB approval. All comments will 

become a matter of public record. 

Dated: September 27, 2007. 

Kenneth C. Clayton, 

Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Service. 

[FR Doc. E7–19418 Filed 10–1–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Forest Service 

Newspapers Used for Publication of 

Legal Notice of Appealable Decisions 

for the Northern Region; Northern 

Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, and 

portions of South Dakota and Eastern 

Washington 

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. 

ACTION: Notice. 


rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
56048 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 2, 2007 / Notices 

SUMMARY: This notice lists the 

newspapers that will be used by all 

Ranger Districts, Forests, Grasslands, 

and the Regional Office of the Northern 

Region to publish legal notices for 

public comment and decisions subject 

to appeal and predecisional 

administrative review under 36 CFR 

215, 217, and 218. The intended effect 

of this action is to inform interested 

members of the public which 

newspapers will be used to publish 

legal notices for public comment or 

decisions; thereby allowing them to 

receive constructive notice of a 

decision, to provide clear evidence of 

timely notice, and to achieve 

consistency in administering the 

appeals process. 

DATES: Publication of legal notices in 

the listed newspapers will begin with 

decisions subject to appeal that are 

made on or after October 1, 2007. The 

list of newspapers will remain in effect 

until another notice is published in the 

Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Acting Regional Appeals Coordinator; 

Northern Region; P.O. Box 7669; 

Missoula, Montana 59807. Phone: (406) 

329–3381. 

The newspapers to be used are as 

follows: 

Northern Regional Office 

Regional Forester decisions in 

Montana: The Missoulian, Great Falls 

Tribune, and The Billings Gazette. 

Regional Forester decisions in 

Northern Idaho and Eastern 

Washington: Coeur d’Alene Press and 

Lewiston Tribune. 

Regional Forester decisions in North 

Dakota: Bismarck Tribune. 

Regional Forester decisions in South 

Dakota: Bismarck Tribune. 

Beaverhead/Deerlodge NF - Montana 

Standard. 

Bitterroot NF - Ravalli Republic. 

Clearwater NF - Lewiston Tribune. 

Custer NF - Billings Gazette 

(Montana). 

Rapid City Journal (South Dakota). 

Dakota Prairie Grasslands - Bismarck 

Tribune (North and South Dakota). 

Flathead NF - Daily Inter Lake. 

Gallatin NF - Bozeman Chronicle. 

Helena NF - Independent Record. 

Idaho Panhandle NFs - Coeur d’Alene 

Press. 

Kootenai NF - Daily Inter Lake. 

Lewis & Clark NF - Great Falls 

Tribune. 

Lolo NF - Missoulian. 

Nez Perce NF - Lewiston Tribune. 

Supplemental notices may be placed 

in any newspaper, but time frames/ 

deadlines will be calculated based upon 

notices in newspapers of record listed 

above. 

Dated: September 25, 2007. 

Kathleen A. McAllister, 

Deputy Regional Forester. 

[FR Doc. 07–4847 Filed 10–1–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–807] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip from the Republic of 

Korea: Preliminary Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review and Intent To 

Reinstate Kolon Industries, Inc. in the 

Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On November 14, 1996, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) revoked in part the 

antidumping duty order on 

polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet 

and strip (PET film) from the Republic 

of Korea (Korea) with respect to subject 

merchandise manufactured and 

exported by Kolon Industries, Inc. 

(Kolon). See Polythylene Terephthalate 

Film, Sheet, and Strip from the Republic 

of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and Notice 

of Revocation in Part, 61 FR 58734 

(November 14, 1996) (Revocation). As 

the result of an adequate allegation from 

domestic interested parties in this 

proceeding, the Department, pursuant to 

section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act), is now 

conducting a changed circumstances 

review to determine whether Kolon has 

resumed dumping PET film and 

whether the antidumping order should 

be reinstated for PET film manufactured 

and exported by Kolon. See Initiation of 

Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review: Polyethylene 

Terephthalate Film Sheet and Strip 

from Korea, 72 FR 527 (January 5, 2007) 

(CCR Initiation). We preliminarily 

determine that Kolon has sold PET film 

at less than normal value (NV) and that 

the order on PET film from Korea 

should be reinstated with respect to PET 

film manufactured and exported by 

Kolon. We will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend 

liquidation of all entries of PET film 

manufactured and exported by Kolon 

and entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date of publication of this notice in 

the Federal Register. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 2, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael J. Heaney or Robert James, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4475 or (202) 482–

0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 5, 1991, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

antidumping duty order on PET film 

from Korea. See Antidumping Duty 

Order: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film 

Sheet and Strip From Korea, 56 FR 

25660 (June 5, 1991). On November 14, 

1996 , the Department revoked the order 

with respect to Kolon after having 

determined that Kolon sold the 

merchandise at not less than normal 

value for a period of at least three 

consecutive years. See Revocation. The 

three administrative reviews forming 

the basis of the revocation are the June 

1, 1992 through May 31, 1993, review; 

the June 1, 1993, through May 31, 1994, 

review; and the June 1, 1994, through 

May 31, 1995, review. The final results 

of the June 1992 through May 31, 1993, 

and the June 1993 through May 31, 

1994, administrative reviews were 

published on July 5, 1996. See 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film Sheet 

and Strip from Korea; Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Notice of Revocation in Part 

61 FR 35177, (July 5, 1996) (Second and 

Third Final Results). The final results of 

the June 1994 through May 31, 1995, 

administrative review were published 

on November 14, 1996. See Polyethylene 

Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip 

from Korea; Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Notice of Revocation in Part 

61 FR 58374, (November 14, 1996) 

(Fourth Final Results). Pursuant to 19 

CFR 353.25(b) of the regulations in 

effect at the time, and as part of its 

request for revocation, on June 28, 1996, 

Kolon agreed to immediate 

reinstatement in the Order should the 

Department conclude that subsequent to 

the revocation, Kolon sold the subject 

merchandise at less than normal value 

(NV). (19 CFR 353.25(b) has been 

superceded by 19 CFR 

351.222(b)(2)(i)(B).) However, the 

language in 19 CFR 351.222(b)(2)(i)(B) is 

largely unchanged from 19 CFR 353.25. 

See CCR Initiation at 530. 

Due to allegations of resumed 

dumping submitted by DuPont Teijin 

Films (DuPont), Mitsubishi Polyester 


rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES