alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 15-4 Filed 01/18/2005 Page 1 of 12
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 15-4 Filed 01/18/2005 Page 2 of 12
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 15-4 Filed 01/18/2005 Page 3 of 12
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 15-4 Filed 01/18/2005 Page 4 of 12
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 15-4 Filed 01/18/2005 Page 5 of 12
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 15-4 Filed 01/18/2005 Page 6 of 12
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 15-4 Filed 01/18/2005 Page 7 of 12
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 15-4 Filed 01/18/2005 Page 8 of 12
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 15-4 Filed 01/18/2005 Page 9 of 12
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 15-4 Filed 01/18/2005 Page 10 of 12
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 15-4 Filed 01/18/2005 Page 11 of 12
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 15-4 Filed 01/18/2005 Page 12 of 12
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1876 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1876

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to direct the Secretary of 
 the Treasury to establish uniform standards for the use of electronic 
 signatures with respect to any request for disclosure of a taxpayer's 
            return or return information to a practitioner.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2019

Mr. Portman (for himself and Mr. Bennet) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to direct the Secretary of 
 the Treasury to establish uniform standards for the use of electronic 
 signatures with respect to any request for disclosure of a taxpayer's 
            return or return information to a practitioner.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Electronic Signature Standards 
Act''.

SEC. 2. UNIFORM STANDARDS FOR THE USE OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES FOR 
              DISCLOSURE AUTHORIZATIONS TO, AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 
              OF, PRACTITIONERS.

    Section 6061(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 
to read as follows:
            ``(3) Published guidance.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall publish 
                guidance as appropriate to define and implement any 
                waiver of the signature requirements or any method 
                adopted under paragraph (1).
                    ``(B) Electronic signatures for disclosure 
                authorizations to, and other authorizations of, 
                practitioners.--Not later than 6 months after the date 
                of the enactment of this subparagraph, the Secretary 
                shall publish guidance to establish uniform standards 
                and procedures for the acceptance of taxpayers' 
                signatures appearing in electronic form with respect to 
                any request for disclosure of a taxpayer's return or 
                return information under section 6103(c) to a 
                practitioner or any power of attorney granted by a 
                taxpayer to a practitioner.
                    ``(C) Practitioner.--For purposes of subparagraph 
                (B), the term `practitioner' means any individual in 
                good standing who is regulated under section 330 of 
                title 31, United States Code.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


The Board of Directors
ARTISTdirect Records, LLC:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-53208, No. 333-38104, No. 333-63572 and No. 68396) on Form S-8 of
ARTISTdirect, Inc. of our report dated February 14, 2003, with respect to the
balance sheets of ARTISTdirect Records, LLC as of December 31, 2001 and 2002,
and the related statements of operations, changes in members' deficit and cash
flows for the period from May 31, 2001 (inception) through December 31, 2001 and
the year ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002,
Annual Report on Form 10-K of ARTISTdirect, Inc.


                                        /s/ KPMG LLP



Los Angeles, California
March 31, 2003
#### STATE v. LUCAS

No. 73 PC.

Case below: 21 N.C. App. 343.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 June 1974.
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17-6 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 1 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17-6 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 2 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17-6 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 3 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17-6 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 4 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17-6 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 5 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17-6 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 6 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17-6 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 7 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17-6 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 8 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17-6 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 9 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17-6 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 10 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17-6 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 11 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17-6 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 12 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17-6 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 13 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17-6 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 14 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17-6 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 15 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 4 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 4 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### CANNADY v. WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMM.

No. 33 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 247.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 October 1976. Appeal dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question 5 October 1976.
Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 2 of 14
Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 3 of 14
Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 4 of 14
Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 5 of 14
Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 6 of 14
Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 7 of 14
Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 8 of 14
Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 9 of 14
Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 10 of 14
Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 11 of 14
Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 12 of 14
Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 13 of 14
Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 17 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 14 of 14
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (the Company) for the period ending July 31, 2003, I, D. Michael Parker, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended July 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended July 31, 2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: September 15, 2003



/s/    D. MICHAEL PARKERD. Michael Parker Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 184 

To authorize the appropriation of funds to the Centers for Disease Control 

and Prevention for conducting or supporting research on firearms safety 

or gun violence prevention. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2019 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. CASEY, Ms. HASSAN, Ms. WARREN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. 

CARDIN, Mr. UDALL, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. REED, Mr. SCHUMER, Ms. STABENOW, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Ms. HARRIS, Mr. MURPHY, Ms. CORTEZ

MASTO, Mr. COONS, Mr. LEAHY, Ms. BALDWIN, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. SCHATZ, Mr. KAINE, Ms. SMITH, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. 

BROWN, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. CARPER, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. BOOKER, 

Mr. BENNET, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. WARNER, Mr. 

MENENDEZ, Mr. WYDEN, Ms. ROSEN, and Mr. PETERS) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To authorize the appropriation of funds to the Centers for 

Disease Control and Prevention for conducting or supporting research on firearms safety or gun violence prevention. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 184 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gun Violence Preven3 tion Research Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR RESEARCH BY CDC ON FIREARMS 

5 SAFETY OR GUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION. 

6 There is authorized to be appropriated to the Centers 

7 for Disease Control and Prevention $50,000,000 for each 

8 of fiscal years 2020 through 2025 for the purpose of con9 ducting or supporting research on firearms safety or gun 

10 violence prevention under the Public Health Service Act 

11 (42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.). The amount authorized to be ap12 propriated by the preceding sentence is in addition to any 

13 other amounts authorized to be appropriated for such pur14 pose. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Keystone  Consolidated  Industries,
Inc.  (the  Company)  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Bert E.  Downing,  Jr.,  Vice  President,  Chief  Financial  Officer,  Corporate
Controller, and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Keystone  Consolidated  Industries,  Inc.  and will be retained by
Keystone  Consolidated  Industries,  Inc. and  furnished to the SEC or its staff
upon request.




/s/  Bert E. Downing, Jr.
-----------------------------------------
Bert E. Downing, Jr.
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Corporate Controller and Treasurer
May 20, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 1999 and the Consolidated Statement
of Income for the periods ending September 30, 1999 and 1998, and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                  184400                       0
<SECURITIES>                                 0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                           561900                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0                       0
<INVENTORY>                             265200                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1096700                       0
<PP&E>                                10858100                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                         6795700                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         5873700                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   826800                       0
<BONDS>                                      0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                  0                       0
<COMMON>                                 93500                       0
<OTHER-SE>                             1350700                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           5873700                       0
<SALES>                                1895600                 1663800<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       1895600                 1663800<F1>
<CGS>                                   773000                  771100<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          1821400                 1687300<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       (13800)                 (13300)<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      140900                  114200<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          88000                 (10200)<F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                             51500                   10100<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      36500                 (20300)<F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                               0                  277400<F1>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0                       0
<CHANGES>                               (4100)                       0
<NET-INCOME>                             32400                  257100<F1>
<EPS-BASIC>                              .37                    2.96<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .37                    2.96<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Amount restated as the result of the merger with Oryx Energy Company accounted
for using the pooling of interests method of accounting.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. JOYNER

No. 112.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 27.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal denied 26 November 1974. . .
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7088

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

AL-LAIN DELONT NORMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior

District Judge. (2:08-cr-00034-RGD-FBS-1)

Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Al-Lain Delont Norman, Appellant Pro Se. Damion J. Hansen,

Special Assistant United States Attorney, Kevin Michael 

Comstock, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Al-Lain Delont Norman appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion to preserve his right to challenge his 

sentence under Alleyne v United States, 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013). 

Because Norman previously filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion, we conclude that the district court properly determined 

that it lacked the authority to grant his request. Norman must 

first obtain authorization from this court before raising a 

“second or successive” collateral attack on his sentence. 28 

U.S.C. § 2255(h); United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 205 

(4th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s 

judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Case 1:07-cv-03427-NRB Document 14-6 Filed 10/18/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03427-NRB Document 14-6 Filed 10/18/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03427-NRB Document 14-6 Filed 10/18/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03473-GEL Document 3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03473-GEL Document 3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03473-GEL Document 3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03473-GEL Document 3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03473-GEL Document 3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03473-GEL Document 3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03473-GEL Document 3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03473-GEL Document 3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03473-GEL Document 3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 9 of 9
#### FUR CO. v. WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMM.

No. 109 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 609.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 May 1979.
# DPAA, Vietnam Delegation Conduct Annual Tech Talks 

/ Published Sept. 19, 2023
WASHINGTON, D.C., 
A Vietnamese Office for Seeking Missing Persons (VNOSMP) delegation participated with their Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) counterparts in the Annual U.S.-Vietnam Technical Talks in Washington D.C., Sept. 13, 2023.  

Conducted for the first time in the U.S. capital, the technical talks allowed representatives from DPAA and the VNOSMP to discuss increased joint field operations throughout Vietnam for the upcoming year; policy and operational initiatives; and exploring how to increase mission effectiveness and efficiency to account for U.S. personnel who are still missing from the Vietnam War.

“Building upon a 35-year record of cooperation on accounting for Americans missing from the Vietnam War, these talks reinforced DPAA’s operational priority of field activities in Vietnam and the VNOSMP’s critical support to those,” said Kelly McKeague, DPAA director. “

During President Biden’s recent visit to Vietnam, the partnership relationship between the Vietnam and the U.S. was upgraded to a comprehensive strategic partnership, the foundation of which was the MIA accounting mission that began in the early 1980s. The President committed to Vietnamese government leaders the resolve and unwavering cooperation in the collective pursuit of both nations to continue addressing war legacy issues, according to a White House statement.

This year’s talks also aligned with several milestone anniversaries including the 50th Anniversary of the VNOSMP and the 35th Anniversary of sustained joint field activities between the two nations for the recovery of missing Americans.

Acidic soil conditions, aging witnesses, and urban development at potential recovery sites can hinder the success of the accounting mission in Vietnam.  “Vietnam’s Vice Foreign Minister Ngoc described the challenges perfectly when he stated the next 3-5 years provides a ‘golden window’ with which to pursue efforts to search for and recover remains”, McKeague added.

For more information on DPAA’s efforts to account for the missing around the world, visit the Agency’s website atwww.dpaa.miland view the “Our Missing” section.
#### STATE V. RUCKER

No. 387 PC

Case below: 47 NC App 585

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 September 1980. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 16 September 1980.
#### STATE v. McCARN

No. 9 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 458.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 1978.
Case 1:07-cv-03417-DAB-DCF Document 6 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03417-DAB-DCF Document 6 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03388-MGC Document 3 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 40 of 42

Case 1:07-cv-03388-MGC Document 3 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 42 of 42
#### WHITTEN v. AMC/JEEP, INC.

No. 18 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 161.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 5 October 1976. Petition by Defendant King for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 October 1976.
Exhibit 13.1









CERTIFICATIONS



The certifications
set forth below are being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the
“Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Guangyu Yuan,
the Chief Executive Officer and Hua Zhong, the Chief Financial Officer of CNOOC Limited, each certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with
                                         the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in
                                         the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
                                         of operations of CNOOC Limited.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:
April21,
2017





|   
|---
|By:
|   
|   







|
|





|   
|---
|By:
|   
|   









|
|
#### STATE v. KING and McDOUGALD

No. 44 PC.

Case below: 21 N.C. App. 549.

Petition of McDougald for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 3 September 1974.
ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 12-13-00343-CR OFFENSE: 3

Richard Earl Hartsfield v: The State

STYLE: ofTexas COUNTY: Smith

147*-/¥

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 241st District Court

DATE: 12/3/2014 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 241-1150-13

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Richard Earl Hartsfield v. Tl

STYLE: ofTexas

ie State

Petition

!47q-;«/

PRO SE CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

y&?vs&> JUDGE:

DATE: ^//^>/^/r

JUDGE: f/K CbAAbrC-,

SIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD