alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of IVAX Diagnostics, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Deutsch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



|1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 30, 2006



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|                                       
|/s/    Mark S. Deutsch                 
|Mark S. Deutsch Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1504 

To amend section 3606 of title 18, United States Code, to grant probation 

officers authority to arrest hostile third parties who obstruct or impede 

a probation officer in the performance of official duties. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2019 

Mr. TILLIS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 3606 of title 18, United States Code, 

to grant probation officers authority to arrest hostile 

third parties who obstruct or impede a probation officer 

in the performance of official duties. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Probation Officer Pro5 tection Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF PROBATION OFFICERS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3606 of title 18, United 

8 States Code, is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1504 IS

1 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘and return 

2 of a probationer’’ and by inserting ‘‘authority 

3 of probation officers’’; 

4 (2) by striking ‘‘If there’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) If 

5 there’’; and 

6 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(b) A probation officer, while in the performance of 

8 his or her official duties, may arrest a person without a 

9 warrant if there is probable cause to believe that the per10 son has forcibly assaulted, resisted, opposed, impeded, in11 timidated, or interfered with the probation officer, or a 

12 fellow probation officer, in violation of section 111. The 

13 arrest authority described in this subsection shall be exer14 cised under such rules and regulations as the Director of 

15 the Administrative Office of the United States Courts 

16 shall prescribe.’’. 

17 (b) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections for 

18 subchapter A of chapter 229 of title 18, United States 

19 Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 

20 3606 and inserting the following: 

‘‘3606. Arrest authority of probation officers.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
HEI, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-33322, 33-46928, 33-46929 and 333-49489) on Form S-8 of HEI, Inc. of our
report dated October 6, 1999, except as to Note 5 which is as of October 22,
1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of HEI, Inc. and subsidiary,
as of August 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then
ended, which report appears in the August 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-KSB
of HEI, Inc.



KPMG LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
November 24, 1999
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7334

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT KOGER, a/k/a Rick Thompson, a/k/a John Stern,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cr-00018-LO-1)

Submitted: February 17, 2022 Decided: February 23, 2022

Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Koger, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Koger appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of 

error coram nobis, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), and his motions to unseal and for 

discovery. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Koger, No. 1:14-cr00018-LO-1 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 31, 2021 & entered Sept. 1, 2021). We grant Koger’s 

motions to exceed page limitations and to seal his informal brief, and we dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1999
<CASH>                                           6,561
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,307
<ALLOWANCES>                                       335
<INVENTORY>                                      7,286
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,937
<PP&E>                                          20,586
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,332
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,631
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,002
<BONDS>                                          4,588
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,631
<SALES>                                         18,242
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,242
<CGS>                                           13,723
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,723
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,944
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    26
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 169
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    547
<INCOME-TAX>                                        81
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                466
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       466
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. KEARNEY

No. 67 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 616.

Application by defendant for further review denied 3 November 1978.
Case 1:07-cv-03473-GEL Document 11 Filed 01/24/2008 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMAATION EXTRACTED FROM
KNICKERBOCKER VILLAGE INC.'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          54,537
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  506,261
<ALLOWANCES>                                   270,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,570,805
<PP&E>                                       7,412,420
<DEPRECIATION>                                 252,009
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,049,117
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,596,304
<BONDS>                                      6,196,967
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       317,048
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,083,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,049,117
<SALES>                                      4,919,746
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,922,800
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,635,271
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             284,257
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                287,529
<INCOME-TAX>                                   147,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            140,529
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   140,529
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31.2

         I, Scott Landow, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Parentech, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
         caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

                  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
         about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
         of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
         evaluation; and

                  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
         registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
         quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
         or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditor and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

                  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
         the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
         which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
         ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
         and

                  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
         management or other employees who have a significant role in the
         registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated:  March 30, 2004


         /s/ Scott Landow
         ------------------------------------
            Scott Landow,
            Chief Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE KUHLMAN SEPTEMBER 1997 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,396
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  101,407
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,689
<INVENTORY>                                     63,514
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,665
<PP&E>                                         219,768
<DEPRECIATION>                                 100,914
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 420,217
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          122,014
<BONDS>                                        101,830
<COMMON>                                        16,553
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     150,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   420,217
<SALES>                                        468,733
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               468,733
<CGS>                                          361,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  361,343
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   322
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,532
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,168
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,364
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,364
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.24
        

</TABLE>
#### POWER & LIGHT CO. v. MERRITT

No. 217 PC.

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 438.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 August 1979.
# Court of Appeals

First District of Texas

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Texas 77002

- 2066 S HERRY R ADACK

C HIEF J USTICE

T ERRY J ENNINGS

E VELYN K EYES

L AURA C ARTER H IGLEY

J ANE B LAND

M ICHAEL M ASSENGALE

H ARVEY B ROWN

R EBECA H UDDLE

R USSELL L LOYD

J USTICES C HRISTOPHER A. P RINE

C LERK OF THE C OURT

J ANET W ILLIAMS

C HIEF S TAFF A TTORNEY

P HONE : 713

- 274

- 2700

F AX : 713

- 755

- 8131

www.txcourts.gov/1stcoa.aspx



## May 22, 2015

Khristel L. Samarripa

Admin. Asst. II

Office of the Attorney General

Criminal Appeals Division

William P. Clements Bldg. 8 th 

## Floor

300w. 15 th 

## Street

Austin, Texas 78701

k hristel.samarripa@texasattorneygeneral.gov



## (512) 475

- 3321

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 01

- 1 2

- 00 888

- CR Trial Court Case Number: 1359172

Style: Ricky Barnard Justice v. The State of Texas

We are forwarding the records for the above referenced cause via the FTP site.

Sincerely,

Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court

By Jesse Rodriguez, Deputy Clerk IV
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH     Document 9      Filed 08/09/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH     Document 9      Filed 08/09/2007     Page 2 of 2
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1749 

AN ACT 

To clarify seasoning requirements for certain refinanced 

mortgage loans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1749 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Affordable 

3 Mortgages for Veterans Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SEASONING REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN REFI5 NANCED MORTGAGE LOANS. 

6 (a) GINNIE MAE.—Section 306(g)(1) of the National 

7 Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1721(g)(1)) is amended by strik8 ing the second sentence. 

9 (b) VETERANS LOANS.—Section 3709(c) of title 38, 

10 United States Code, is amended— 

11 (1) in the matter before paragraph (1), by 

12 striking ‘‘is refinanced’’ and inserting ‘‘is a refi13 nance’’; and 

14 (2) by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and in15 serting the following new paragraphs: 

16 ‘‘(1) the date on which the borrower has made 

17 at least six consecutive monthly payments on the 

18 loan being refinanced; and 

19 ‘‘(2) the date that is 210 days after the first 

20 payment due date of the loan being refinanced.’’. 

21 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

22 may be construed to restrict or otherwise modify the au-
3 

†S 1749 ES

1 thorities of the Government National Mortgage Associa2 tion. 

Passed the Senate June 5, 2019. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1749 

AN ACT 

To clarify seasoning requirements for certain 

refinanced mortgage loans, and for other purposes.
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 1 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 2 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 3 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 4 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 5 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 6 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 7 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 8 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 9 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 10 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 11 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 12 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 13 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 14 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 15 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 16 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 17 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 18 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 19 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 20 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 21 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 22 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 23 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 24 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 25 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 32 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 26 of 26
#### Edward M. Miller et al., Respondents-Appellants, v Herbert Daub, Appellant-Respondent, Capitol Enterprises Jewelry Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

January 20,1987

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Jurón & Minzner, P. C. (Albert A. Jurón*of counsel), for appellant-respondent. *Moore, Wohl & Newman, P. C. (Louis I. Newman*and *Gary M. Gash*of counsel), for respondents-appellants.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order entered May 31, 1985 and judgment entered June 7, 1985 modified by granting judgment in favor of appellant *614Daub against plaintiffs on the first counterclaim in the sum of $2,500; as modified, order and judgment affirmed, with $25 costs to the appellant.

Based upon defendant Daub’s exhibit C and the testimony received at trial, defendant should have been awarded judgment on the first counterclaim. As to the main cause, we think the court should have admitted and considered the deposition testimony of the absent nonparty witness Padrusch. It appears from the record that the witness’ attendance was unable to be procured despite diligent efforts by plaintiffs as well as by the trial court (CPLR 3117 [a] [3] [iv]). Nonetheless, even after allowing for this evidence, we are in agreement with the determination below that plaintiffs’ case was not made by a preponderance of the evidence. Accordingly, so much of the order and judgment as dismissed the complaint is affirmed.

Hughes, P. J., Riccobono and Sandifer, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of William Lyon Homes (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period endingDecember 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William Lyon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company. 

 

/s/    WILLIAM LYON                

William Lyon 

Chief Executive Officer 

February 18, 2003
#### HANKINS v. SOMERS

No. 66 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 617.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 May 1979.
Exhibit 15.14




[LETTERHEAD OF DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON]




Consent of DeGolyer and MacNaughton







We consent to the reference to our firm in the form and context in which they appear in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of CNOOC Limited, the inclusion of our report dated February 28, 2015, herein, and to the incorporation by reference in any Registration Statement on Form F-3 and related Prospectus Supplements of CNOOC Limited for the registration of debt securities and guarantees previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.








/s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughton

DeGolyer and MacNaughton

Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716





Dallas, Texas




April 22, 2015