alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 1 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 2 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 3 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 4 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 5 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 6 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 7 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 8 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 9 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 10 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 11 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 12 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 13 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 14 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 15 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 16 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 17 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 18 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 19 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 20 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 21 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 22 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 23 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 24 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-13 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 25 of 25
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 1, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00268

- CR

Quinton Ramon WILLIAMSON

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR0283

Honorable Maria Teresa (Tessa) Herr , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant's motion for an extension until March 29, 2021, to file a brief is granted.

____ _____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 1st day of April, 2021

.

_ __________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
##### 



Exhibit 8.1

SUBSIDIARIES

Advanced Semiconductor Materials (Netherlands Antilles N.V.)

ASM Pacific Technology Limited (subsidiary of ASM Netherlands Antilles N.V.)

ASM Assembly Automation Limited (subsidiary of ASM Pacific Technology Limited)

ASM Assembly Materials Limited (subsidiary of ASM Pacific Technology Limited)

ASM Assembly Products B.V. (subsidiary of ASM Pacific Technology Limited)

ASM Assembly Technology Co. Limited (subsidiary of ASM Pacific Technology
Limited)

ASM Pacific International Marketing Limited (subsidiary of ASM Pacific
Technology
Limited)

ASM Pacific Investments Limited (subsidiary of ASM Pacific Technology Limited)

ASM Pacific KOR Limited (subsidiary of ASM Pacific Technology Limited)

ASM Assembly Equipment Bangkok Limited (subsidiary of ASM Pacific Technology
Limited)

ASM Technology Singapore Pte. Limited (subsidiary of ASM Pacific Technology
Limited)

ASM Technology (M) Sdn. Bhd. (subsidiary of ASM Pacific Technology Limited)

Capital Equipment Distribution Limited (subsidiary of ASM Pacific Technology
Limited)

Shenzhen ASM Micro Electronic Technology Co. Limited (subsidiary of ASM Pacific
Technology Limited)

Shenzhen ASM Precision Machinery Manufactory Limited (subsidiary of ASM Pacific
Technology Limited)

ASM Assembly Equipment (M) Sdn. Bhd. (subsidiary of ASM Pacific Technology
Limited)

ASM Assembly Equipment Trading (Shanghai Co. Limited) (subsidiary of ASM
Pacific
Technology Limited)

ASM Pacific (Bermuda) Limited (subsidiary of ASM Pacific Technology Limited)

ASM Asia Limited (subsidiary of ASM Pacific Technology Limited)





---



##### 



ASM America Inc.

ASM Pacific Assembly Products Inc. (subsidiary of ASM America Inc.)

ASM Japan K.K.

ASM Microchemistry Oy

NanoPhotonics AG

ASM Europe B.V.

ASM France SARL (subsidiary of ASM Europe B.V.)

ASM Belgium N.V. (subsidiary of ASM Europe B.V.)

ASM United Kingdom Sales B.V. (subsidiary of ASM Europe B.V.)

ASM Germany Sales B.V. (subsidiary of ASM Europe B.V.)

ASM Italia SRL (subsidiary of ASM Europe B.V.)

ASM China Limited

ASM Wafer Process Equipment Limited

ASM Far East Marketing Limited (subsidiary of ASM Wafer Process Equipment
Limited)

ASM Korea Limited
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 19-9 Filed 10/24/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 19-9 Filed 10/24/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 19-9 Filed 10/24/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 19-9 Filed 10/24/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 19-9 Filed 10/24/2007 Page 5 of 5
#### John Aff v. John P. Hopkins, Mayor, etc.

1. Appellate Court *Practice—Supposititious*Cases.—The Appellate Court is not authorized to consider supposititious cases.

2. *Mandamus—The Writ—When Not to be*Issued.—A peremptory writ of mandamus will not be awarded where the right sought to be enforced is a mere abstract right, the enforcement of which, by reason of some change of circumstances since the commencement of the suit, can be of no substantial or practical benefit to the petitioner.

Memorandum.—Mandamus. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. John Gibbons, Judge, presiding.

Appeal dismissed in this court.

Opinion filed February 12, 1895.

Bobbins S. Mott, attorney for appellant.

George A. Trude, attorney for appellee; George A. Du-put, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

September 21, 1893, the appellant filed a petition for a mandamus to compel the late Carter H. Harrison, whose tragic death shocked the nation as that of Carnot did the world, then mayor of the city of Chicago, to issue a dram-shop license for a term to end December, 1893.

*530April 28, 1894, by stipulation, John P. Hopkins, successor as mayor, was substituted as defendant or respondent, and the prayer changed to apply to a term to end before the record in this case was filed in this court.

Under the constitution and statutes of this State, this court is authorized to decide many questions of law in real controversies between parties as to their existing rights; but not, as we hold, to instruct or advise as to the law applicable to supposititious cases. What is really sought on this appeal is not a decision of what the law was as to dramshop licenses in 1893 and 1894, but what it is to be in 1895 or thereafter. The court does not. consider such questions. Loven v. People, 46 Ill. App. 306; Washburn v. People, 50 Ill. App. 93.

On demurrer the court dismissed the petition. To reverse the judgment would be, if of any effect at all, to direct the court to issue the mandamus.

“ It is a well recognized principle that courts, in exercising their jurisdiction in mandamus, will not award the peremptory writ where the right sought to be enforced is or has become a mere abstract right, the enforcement of which, by reason of some change of circumstances since the commencement of the suit, can be of no substantial or practical benefit to the petitioner.” Gormley v. Day, 114 Ill. 185. All of which means that we won’t hold a moot court. Bartemeyer v. Iowa, 18 Wallace 129.

If the appellant wants to keep a dramshop hereafter, his license must be upon an application and terms not alluded to in this record. The appeal is dismissed.
**Exhibit
        32(a)**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Decorize, Inc. (the
        “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
        the year ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
        of 1934
        and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.
 
 
 Stephen
        R. Crowder
 
 Stephen
        R. Crowder
 President
        and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal
        Executive Officer)
 September
        28, 2005
#### COLVIN v. SHERMAN

No. 10.

Case below: 46 N.C. App. 348.

Motion of defendants to dismiss plaintiff’s appeal allowed 3 June 1980 without prejudice to plaintiff to petition Court of Appeals for writ of certiorari.
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




Second Allonge to Demand Note




     This Second Allonge to Demand Note is attached to and made a part of that certain Demand Note
(“Note") executed by Lighting Science Group Corporation (the “Borrower"), dated July 25, 2008,
payable to the order of Bank of Montreal (the “Bank”), in the original principal amount of Twenty
Million and No/100 Dollars ($20,000,000.00).



     For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:



     1. The Note is hereby amended as follows:




The date “August 24, 2009” appearing in the first paragraph of the
Note shall be deleted and replaced with the date
“August 24, 2010”.



     2. This Allonge to Demand Note amends the Note as specifically provided herein. All other
provisions of the Note shall not be modified hereby except as expressly set forth herein.



     3. The Borrower hereby directs the Bank to affix this Allonge to Demand Note whereupon the
Note and this Allonge to Demand Note will become and constitute a single instrument.



     4. References in the Note to the Bank of Montreal Loan Authorization Agreement dated as of
July 25, 2008 between the Borrower and the Bank (the “Loan Agreement") shall be deemed to refer to
the Loan Agreement, as amended and as the same may be amended from time to time.



[Signature Page to Follow]




 









 








Dated: As of August 24, 2009




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Lighting Science Group Corporation

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/
Kathryn L. Reynolds
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Kathryn L. Reynolds 	 
	 	 	Its: Chief Financial Officer 	 
	 



Accepted and Agreed:




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Bank of Montreal

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/
Brett M. Sanchez
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Brett M. Sanchez 	 
	 	 	Its: Vice President
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 16, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00250-CV

BETTYE GREER DANDRIDGE, Appellant

V.

JAMES DANDRIDGE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 310th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-33584

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

According to information provided to this court, this appeal is from a 

judgment signed December 6, 2012. Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial 

on January 7, 2013. The clerk’s record was due April 5, 2013, but it has not been 

filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1(a). On April 9, 2013, this court notified the parties 

and the clerk that the record was past due. The clerk responsible for preparing the 

record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to 

pay for the record. 
2

On April 24, 2013, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s 

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, 

appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court 

with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not provided 

this court with proof of payment for the record or filed any other response to this 

court’s notice. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Christopher, and McCally.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      11,473,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               97,256,000<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                124,177,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           253,474,000
<PP&E>                                     172,507,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              38,178,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             497,021,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      114,558,000
<BONDS>                                    157,850,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       32,900,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,822,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 146,084,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               497,021,000
<SALES>                                    401,371,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           401,371,000
<CGS>                                      273,357,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              380,893,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (136,000)<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,459,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,155,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,904,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,996,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,996,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     $ 0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   $ 0.71
<FN>
<F1>Net of allowances of $ 3,637,000
<F2>Includes equity in loss of other operations to be disposed of, $ 922,000.
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 6711]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2346]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel Review of Education Project Training 
Applications (R-25s).
    Date: March 3, 2005.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Judy S. Hannah, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 
7190, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-0287.
    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel Specialized Centers for Cell-based Therapy 
and Data and Coordinating Center.
    Date: March 10-11, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Loews Hotel Annapolis, 126 West Street, Annapolis, MD 
21401.
    Contact Person: David A. Wilson, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Affairs, 
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7204, MSC 7924, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 435-0929.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS.)

    Dated: February 2, 2005.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-2346 Filed 2-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00028

- CV

Abelardo ZAMORA and Janet Zamora,

Individually and as Next Friends of Abelardo Zamora Jr., a Minor Child,

Appellants

v.

Jacob James DAVILA

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 387082

Honorable Tina Torres, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the t rial court is

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellee, Jacob James Davila, recover his costs of this appeal

from appellants, Abelardo Zamora and Janet Zamora.

SIGNED December 9, 2015.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
#### STATE v. CURRY

No. 148 PC.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 101.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 26 June 1975.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 6712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2338]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Microbiology, Infectious diseases and AIDS 
Initial Review Group, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research 
Committee.
    Date: February 23-25, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Annie Walker-Abbey, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge 
Drive, RM. 3266, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-2671, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fb9a9a99999e82bb95929a929fd5959293d59c948d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7415151616110d341a1d151d105a1a1d1c5a131b02">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 1, 2005.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-2338 Filed 2-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### SPENCER v. SPENCER

No. 51 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 481.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 28 November 1978. Appeal dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question 28 November 1978.
#### STATE v. SHAW

No. 119PC

Case below: 51 NC App 248

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 April 1981.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1859 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1859

 To prohibit the indefinite detention of persons by the United States, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 2019

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the indefinite detention of persons by the United States, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sixth Amendment Preservation Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE INDEFINITE DETENTION OF PERSONS BY THE 
              UNITED STATES.

    (a) Limitation on Detention.--Section 4001 of title 18, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following:
    ``(a) No person shall be imprisoned or otherwise detained by the 
United States except consistent with the Constitution.'';
            (2) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b)(1) A general authorization to use military force, a 
declaration of war, or any similar authority, on its own, shall not be 
construed to authorize the imprisonment or detention without charge or 
trial of a person apprehended in the United States.
    ``(2) Paragraph (1) applies to an authorization to use military 
force, a declaration of war, or any similar authority enacted before, 
on, or after the date of the enactment of the Sixth Amendment 
Preservation Act.
    ``(3) This section shall not be construed to authorize the 
imprisonment or detention of any person who is apprehended in the 
United States.''.
    (b) Repeal of Authority of the Armed Forces of the United States To 
Detain Covered Persons Pursuant to the Authorization for Use of 
Military Force.--Section 1021 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 10 U.S.C. 801 note) is 
repealed.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES ) No. ACM 40461

Appellee )

)

v. )

) ORDER

Brandon P. CLARK )

Airman Basic (E-1) )

U.S. Air Force )

Appellant ) Special Panel

On 17 July 2024, Appellant submitted a Motion to Withdraw from Appellant Review and Motion to Attach. Specifically, Appellant moved to attach a 

DD Form 2330, Waiver/Withdrawal of Appellate Rights in General and Special 

Courts-Martial Subject to Review by a Court of Criminal Appeals, signed by 

Appellant and Appellant’s counsel on 17 July 2024.

The Government did not submit any opposition.

Accordingly, it is by the court on this 22d day of July, 2024,

ORDERED:

Appellant’s Motion to Withdraw from Appellate Review and Motion to Attach are GRANTED. Appellant’s case is forwarded to the Appellate Records 

Branch (JAJM) for further processing in accordance with Rules for CourtsMartial 1115(f)(3) and 1201, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024

ed.). 

FOR THE COURT

OLGA STANFORD, Capt, USAF

Commissioner