alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

# Soldier Accounted For From World War II (Franco, P.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### ROMAG FASTENERS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MITZI INTERNATIONAL HANDBAG & ACCESSORIES, LTD., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-1229.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 31, 2005.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
SEC Form 10Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                         4268000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4640000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     37000
<INVENTORY>                                    2798000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              12897000
<PP&E>                                         6676000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6323000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                19694000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5561000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       1592000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     19694
<SALES>                                       16411000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              16411000
<CGS>                                         14468000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 16118000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               16000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 282000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    170000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             112000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    112000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10


</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-15060-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15155-AKH Document 25 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:06-cv-15155-AKH Document 25 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### BURKHIMER v. HARROLD

No. 141 PC.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 174.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 February 1974.
* Pursuant to 5 th Cir. Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 th Cir. Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-11306

ROBERT W. PRZYBYLSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

_______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(3:97-CV-1667-P)

_______________________________

November 2, 1999 Before GARWOOD, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appellant Robert W. Przybylski (“Przybylski”) appeals from the district court’s ruling granting appellee United States Elevator Corporation (“U.S. Elevator”) summary judgment. Specifically, Przybylski contends that the district court erred in holding that he had failed to state a prima facie case for age discrimination under the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act, Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 21.051. We have considered the parties’ arguments and the record,2

and we agree with the district court that Przybylski’s claim can be resolved as a matter of law. Przybylski’s claim based on his transfer fails because under the undisputed facts with respect to such transfer, the same did not constitute an adverse employment action. We therefore affirm, essentially for the same reasons as enunciated by the district court in its opinion issued on October 9, 1998. To the extent that Przybylski’s claim complains of his subsequent dismissal, Przybylski offered no evidence to raise a fact issue with respect to the legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for his firing advanced by U.S. Elevator.
AFFIRMED
#### STATE v. ROWE

No. 10 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 611.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 12 September 1977. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 12 September 1977.
Case 1:07-cv-03413-LAP     Document 26      Filed 01/14/2008     Page 1 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-03413-LAP     Document 26      Filed 01/14/2008     Page 2 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-03413-LAP     Document 26      Filed 01/14/2008     Page 3 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-03413-LAP     Document 26      Filed 01/14/2008     Page 4 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-03413-LAP     Document 26      Filed 01/14/2008     Page 5 of 5
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JEANNE PAUL and ELLEN VALCIN
, Appellant s ,

v.

HOMEOWNER CHOICE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE

COMPANY
,

Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 1

- 164

[ May 19 , 2021 ]

Appeal from the C ounty Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Giuseppina Miranda , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. C OCE 1 5

- 26883 and CACE 18

- 27515.

Melissa A. Giasi and Erin M. Berger of Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa , for appellant s

.

Marc J. Gutterman and Jordan E. Goldfar b o f Gutterman Trial Group

, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed. See Edwards v. Safepoint Insurance Co. , No. 4D21

- 107 (Fla.

4th DCA May 12, 2021).

G ROSS
, G ERBER and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Workstream Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K/A for the year ending May 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Polansky, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                       /s/ David Polansky
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       David Polansky
                                       Chief Financial Officer

Dated: November 1, 2004
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 0275

_____________________________
D EWEY W AYNE H AMM , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County

. John F. Simon , Judge

. May 11, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W ETHERELL , R AY , and O STERHAUS , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.33 1

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Having considered petitioner's arguments, we conclude that 

our extraordinary intervention is not warranted at this time. NRAP 

21(b)(1); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 

P.2d at 851. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

It 

Pickering 

reL.1)--a.„W 

Parraguirre 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge 

Danny L. Hughes 

Goedert & Associates 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 19474 e
Case 1:07-cv-03239-RPP     Document 17      Filed 06/10/2008     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03239-RPP     Document 17      Filed 06/10/2008     Page 2 of 2
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 of First National Bancshares, Inc pertaining to the First National
Bancshares, Inc. 2008 Restricted Stock Plan (No. 333-153162), First National
Bancshares, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan as amended August 2005 (No.
333-150243) and the First National Bancshares, Inc./Carolina National
Corporation 2003 Stock Option Plan (No. 333-150242) of our report dated April
29, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of First
National Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary included in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.  Our report dated
April 29, 2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements includes an
emphasis paragraph relating to an uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern.




/s/Elliott
      Davis, LLC




April 30,
2009


Greenville,
South Carolina
Case 1:07-cv-03376-RLE Document 17 Filed 06/23/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03376-RLE Document 17 Filed 06/23/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### TEAGUE v. ALEXANDER

No. 133 PC.

Case below: 38 N.C. App. 332.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 January 1979.
Norman C. Kleinberg 

Theodore V. H. Mayer 

William J. Beausoleil 

HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP 

One Battery Park Plaza 

New York, New York 10004-1482 

(212) 837-6000 

Attorneys for Defendant Merck & Co., Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

-----------------------------------------------------x 

IN RE: : 

Fosamax Products Liability Litigation : 

-----------------------------------------------------x 

This Document Relates to: : 1:06-md-1789 (JFK) 

Bronnie Lee. : 

v. Merck & Co., Inc. : 

 : 

Case No: 1:07-cv-3248-JFK : Rule 7.1 Statement

-----------------------------------------------------x 

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to enable 

Judges and Magistrate Judges of the Court to evaluate possible disqualification or 

recusal, the undersigned attorneys of record for Defendant Merck & Co., Inc. certify that 

it has no parent companies and are not aware of any beneficial owner of more than ten 

percent of its Common Stock. 

Dated: New York, New York 

January 30, 2008 

Respectfully submitted, 

HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP 

By: /s/ 

Norman C. Kleinberg 

Theodore V. H. Mayer 

William J. Beausoleil 

One Battery Park Plaza 

New York, New York 10004-1482 

(212) 837-6000 

beausole@hugheshubbard.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Merck & Co., Inc.

Case 1:07-cv-03248-JFK Document 27 Filed 01/30/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### DICKENS v. PURYEAR

No. 169 PC.

No. 42 (Fall Term).

Case below: 45 N.C. App. 696.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 3 June 1980.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 29, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71556-71557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23383]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Advisory 
Commission; Notice of Public Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act that a meeting of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National 
Historical Park Advisory Commission will be held at 9:30 a.m. on 
Friday, January 20, 2006, at park headquarters, 1850 Dual Highway, 
Hagerstown, Maryland.
    The Commission was established by Public Law 91-664 to meet and 
consult with the Secretary of the Interior on general policies and 
specific matters related to the administration and development of the 
Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park.
    The members of the Commission are as follows:

Mrs. Sheila Rabb Weidenfeld, Chairman.
Mr. Charles J. Weir.
Mr. Barry A. Passett.
Mr. Terry W. Hepburn.
Ms. JoAnn M. Spevacek.
Mrs. Mary E. Woodward.
Mrs. Donna Printz.
Mrs. Ferial S. Bishop.
Ms. Nancy C. Long.
Mrs. Reynolds.
Dr. James H. Gilford.
Brother James Kirkpatrick.

    Topics that will be presented during the meeting include:
    1. Update on park operations.
    2. Update on major construction/development projects.
    3. Update on partnership projects.
    The meeting will be open to the public. Any member of the public 
may

[[Page 71557]]

file with the Commission a written statement concerning the matters to 
be discussed. Persons wishing further information concerning this 
meeting, or who wish to submit written Statements, may contact Kevin 
Brandt, Superintendent, C&O Canal National Historic Park, 1850 Dual 
Highway, Suite 100, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740.
    Minutes of the meeting will be available for public inspection six 
weeks after the meeting at park headquarters, Hagerstown, Maryland.

    Dated: October 31, 2005.
Kevin D. Brandt,
Superintendent, Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park.
[FR Doc. 05-23383 Filed 11-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-56212, 333-32223, 333-11883, 33-35549, 33-35719, 33-72502, Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 2-97542, Post-Effective Amendment
No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 2-78926, and Post-Effective Amendment No. 3
to Registration Statement No. 2-78925 on Form S-8 of our report dated
February 14, 2001, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Thoratec
Corporation for the year ended December 30, 2000.

/s/  DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Francisco, California
January 22, 2002
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 70 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 70 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 70 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 3 of 3
IJKITED STrZTES DISTRICT COUK'I' 

SOGTHERN DISTRICT OF YEW' 1-ORK 

........ ".......... 

IN RE: 

This Uocumen~ Relcz(e.s To .-Ill .-lzlions 

MLZSTER FILE 

1 106-Mn- 1 789 (JFK) 

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE 

C'onsidcrins thc C'ct-titic'atc' i1f Good Standing and ail other docunlc~~ts required by Case 

hla~~rlgcmcnt Ordcr No. 5 suht~~irrcd by counscl, IT JS HEREBY OKLIEKED that: 

Applicant's Namc: Dana Pctcrscn Moore 

Firm Name: Venablr. LLl' 

Address: 750 E. Pratl Street, Suite 900 

CilyIStateIZip: Baltimore, Maryland 2 1202 ._ ..._-.._. ! i . - 4-r-03 __ ,-__--. --r----,- 

TelephoneIFax: (4 10) 244-7799 (4 1 0) 244-7742 

li "- - . + -..-- --'- -- -- --' I- 

_ .& ._--- &--. 

Elnail Address: dpmoore3@ver1able.cam 

is admitted to practice pro hac vice as counsel for Merck LP. Cu.. lnc. in thc above captioncd cast 

Court for the Southern Districl of Ncw Yorli. 

Dated: b, 2008 

Ticw York. N~N: York \\ , - -7 

1- --. . . .- 

United Stales L)lstr~ct Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03464-JFK Document 36 Filed 09/02/2008 Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Good 

Standing 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DISTRICT OF MARYLAND 

I, Felicia C. Cannon, Clerk of the United States District Court for the District 

of hlaryland, 

DO HEREBY CERTIFY that DANA PETERSEN MOORE, ESQ., 

BAR NUMBER 03632, was duly admitted to practice in the United States 

District Court for the District of hlaryland on DECEMBER 9, 1983, and is currently 

in good standing as a member of the bar of this Court. 

Dated at Baltimore, Maryland 

Date: August 19,2008 

FELlClA C. CANNON 

Clerk 

Catherine Scaffidi - ~dput~aerk 

Case 1:07-cv-03464-JFK Document 36 Filed 09/02/2008 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Decorize, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies that Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Annual Report
      on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended June 30, 2006 and filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





/s/
                Billie J. MontleBillie
                J. MontleInterim
                Vice President of Finance and Corporate Controller
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)
              October
                9, 2007
#### POTTS v. BURNETTE

No. 268

No. 108 (Fall Term)

Case below: 46 NC App 626

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 15 August 1980.
Case 1:06-cv-15103-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
1 The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-1799

___________ Patricia Thomas, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the MO Jackson County, * Western District of Missouri. * Defendant, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Circuit Court of Jackson County, * Missouri, and all judges of the Circuit * Court; State of Missouri, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 8, 2009 Filed: October 7, 2009

___________ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Patricia Thomas appeal s the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of her civil rights action and denial of her motion fo r default judgment. After careful review,-2- we conclude that Thomas did not properly serve defendants, and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting de fendants’ motion to di smiss on that basis. SeeMarshall v. Warwick , 155 F.3d 1027, 1030 (8th Cir. 1998) (standards of review); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d), (e), (m); Mo. Rev. Stat. § 506.150.4. In addition, we find no abuse of discretion in the deni al of default judgment. SeeNorsyn, Inc. v. Desai , 351 F.3d 825, 830 (8th Cir. 2003) (court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff’s motion for default judgment wher e defendants were ne ver properly served, and thus had no obligation to file answer). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 20 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 1 of 10Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 20 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 2 of 10Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 20 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 3 of 10Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 20 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 4 of 10Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 20 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 5 of 10Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 20 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 6 of 10Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 20 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 7 of 10Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 20 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 8 of 10Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 20 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 9 of 10Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 20 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 10 of 10
#### STATE v. ARMISTEAD

No. 14.

Case below: 19 N.C. App. 704.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 9 January 1974.