alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16D0096. LORA BROOKS v. CHRISTINA BRISLIN.

Lora Brooksf/k/a Lora Brislin filed a petition againstChristina Brislin seeking

a change in child custody. The trial court entered judgment in favor of Brislin, and

Brooks filed a motion for new trial. The trial court granted the motion in part and

denied it in part, and Brooks filed this application for discretionary appeal.

Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (11), “[a]ll judgments or orders in child custody

cases awarding, refusing to change, or modifying child custody” are directly

appealable. A party seeking to challenge an order in a child custody case, therefore,

may file a direct appeal. See Cohen v. Cohen, 300 Ga. App. 7, 8 (1) (684 SE2d 94)

(2009); Taylor v. Curl, 298 Ga. App. 45 (679 SE2d 80) (2009). We will grant an

otherwise timely discretionary application if the lower court’s order is subject to

direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly, this application is hereby

GRANTED. Brooks shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of

appeal with the trial court. If, however, he has already filed a timely notice of appeal,

she need not file a second notice. The clerk of the trial court is DIRECTED to include

a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/09/2015

November 09, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Kellwood
Company and Subsidiaries Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at October 31,
1996, and from the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings and Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended October 31, 1996,
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                          40,982
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  263,460
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,213
<INVENTORY>                                    247,857
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               567,082
<PP&E>                                         173,109
<DEPRECIATION>                                 109,442
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 819,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          323,011
<BONDS>                                        118,996
<COMMON>                                        95,113
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     242,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   819,632
<SALES>                                        756,870
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               756,870
<CGS>                                          603,655
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  603,655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               107,693
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   673
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,566
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,956
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,256
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,256
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .94
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. THACKER

No. 342PC

Case below: 45 N.C. App. 102

Application by defendant for further review denied 7 October 1980.
#### STATE v. FRAZIER

No. 34 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 757.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 12 September 1977.
#### BROOKS v. BROOKS

No. 24 PC.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 507.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 3 September 1974.
Exhibit  32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)





I, Michael E. Kibler, as the President and Chief Executive Officer of US 1 Industries, Inc., certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of US 1 Industries, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.  The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.





Dated this 31st day of March 2011.





/s/ Michael E. KiblerMichael E. KiblerChief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to US 1 Industries, Inc. and will be retained by US 1 Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

JUDITH WHITTAKER, 

Appellant, 

-v.- 

VERIZON BUSINESS GLOBAL LLC, as 

successor to Reorganized Debtor, MCI 

COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, 

Appellee. 

S.D.N.Y. No. 1:07-cv 3408 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Jeffrey S. Margolin, do hereby certify that I am over the age of 18 and not a 

party to this action and that on the 10th day of August, 2007, I did cause to be served by 

Electronic Mail true and correct copies of Ms. Judith Whittaker’s Reply Brief on Appeal of the 

Bankruptcy Court’s Order Granting Reorganized Debtors' Objection to Proof of Claim No. 3785 

filed by Judith Whittaker on: 

Marcia L. Goldstein, Esq. 

Lori R. Fife, Esq. 

Alfredo Perez, Esq. 

Adam Strochak, Esq. 

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, New York 10153 

marcia.Goldstein@weil.com

lori.fife@weil.com

alfredo.perez@weil.com

adam.strochak@weil.com

I further certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 August 10, 2007 

 /s/ Jeffrey S. Margolin 

 Jeffrey S. Margolin 

 60007447_1.DOC 

Case 1:07-cv-03408-DLC Document 11 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-11098

Conference Calendar

 

JOE LOUIS BOOKER, JR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MIKE CATER,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:98-CV-1999

- - - - - - - - - -

April 15, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joe Louis Booker, Jr., Texas prisoner # 773213, is BARRED

from proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP) under the Prison

Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), because, on at

least three prior occasions while incarcerated, Booker has

brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that

was dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim upon

which relief could be granted. See Booker v. Worsham, No. 96-

40851 (5th Cir. November 29, 1996)(unpublished; dismissal of 
No. 98-11098

-2-

appeal as frivolous in case dismissed by the district court as

frivolous, so counts as two strikes); see Adepegba v. Hammons,

103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996); see also Booker v. Elder, 

No. 4:96cv157 (E.D. Tex. October 8, 1996)(unpublished; adoption

of magistrate judge’s recommendation that suit be dismissed as

frivolous) and Booker v. Driscoll, No. 4:96cv317 (E.D. Tex.

December 16, 1996)(same); see Adepegba, 103 F.3d at 387. One

Texas district court has already dismissed a civil rights

complaint filed by Booker on the three-strikes rule. See Booker

v. Milloy, No. H-98-CV-2885 (S.D. Tex. November 16, 1998).

Accordingly, Booker’s IFP status is DECERTIFIED, and he may

not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is

in prison unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical

injury. See § 1915(g). The appeal is DISMISSED.

Booker has 15 days from the date of this opinion to pay the

full appellate filing fee of $105 to the clerk of the district

court, should he wish to reinstate his appeal.

IFP DECERTIFIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 26, 2009 

jm 

Order 

 

February 26, 2009 

138039 

JOHN DANIEL ASHFORD, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 138039 

 CoA: 288471 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the 

partial filing fee as required by the order of January 9, 2009, the Clerk of the Court is 

hereby directed to close this file.
<PAGE>   1
                                                        Exhibit 11


11. Statement re computation of per share earnings
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            For The Three Months            For The Nine Months
                                               Ended June 30,                  Ended June 30,
                                            1997           1996             1997             1996
                                            ----           ----             ----             ----
<S>                                    <C>             <C>               <C>              <C>      
Shares outstanding at beginning of
  period                                 7,635,136       7,392,225        7,450,878        7,227,972

Net issuance of shares under stock
  award plans, weighted average                627          24,042          119,184          107,323
                                         ---------       ---------        ---------        ---------
Weighted average shares
  outstanding                            7,635,763       7,416,267        7,570,062        7,335,295

Assumed exercise of stock options,
  weighted average of incremental
  shares                                   242,045         451,068             --            469,047
                                         ---------       ---------        ---------        ---------
Average shares and common share
  equivalents outstanding                7,877,808       7,867,335        7,570,062        7,804,342
                                         ---------       ---------        ---------        ---------

Net income (loss) per share             $     0.10      $     0.10      $     (0.05)      $     0.43
                                        ==========      ==========      ===========       ==========

Net income (loss) in thousands          $      761      $      761      $      (415)      $    3,391
                                        ==========      ==========      ===========       ==========
</TABLE>
#### STATE v. MORGAN

No. 6.

Case below: 9 N.C. App. 624.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 January 1971.
#### STALLINGS v. STALLINGS

No. 197 PC.

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 643.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 1978.
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Bontan Corporation Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.





Date:  July 20, 2006





/s/ Kam Shah



Kam Shah

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE v. McKINNEY

No. 4 PC.

Case below: 24 N.C. App. 259.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina .Court of Appeals allowed 4 February 1975.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000055373
<NAME> KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      726,919
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     15,126
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         106,077
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         8,684
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  91,785
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 948,591
<COMMON>                                        50,450
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      148,750
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             72,218
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 271,418
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           296,089
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                 450
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  11,500
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   72,797
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     14,352
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 4,013
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 277,972
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  948,591
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       90,741
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             4,986
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      70,395
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      75,381
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         15,360
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                (114)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  15,246
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         7,037
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,209
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    8,209
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         7,443
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        3,466
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          24,642
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> All common stock owned by parent company; no EPS required.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

                          Independent Auditors' Consent

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements  No.
333-55218 and No. 333-45560 of Brek Energy Corporation (formerly First Ecom.com,
Inc.) on Form S-3 and on Form S-8,  respectively,  of our report dated March 20,
2002, except for note 20(f), as to which the date is April 8, 2002, appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Brek Energy  Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2001.


Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Hong Kong
May 13, 2002
Able Acosta~ Clerk 

Texas Court of Criminal 

Appeals ·at Austin 

June 11, 2015 

Station 

LPS (oU~- 03 

I 

P.O. Box 12308, Capitol 

Austin, Texas, -78711- ~rECE~VlED ~~~ · 

©OOAT OF CRiMINAl APPEALS 

RE: Ronald Dean Gilbert v. The State of Texas; 

CCA No •. WR-56, 645-03 

Trial Court No. W05-72651-V(A) 

Honorable Clerk: 

JUL 1 R 2015 

At. the present time, I'd like to request a Docket sheet 

Report on the above and forementioned cause numberI am in receipt of your letter dated 05/18/2015. in which 

this Honorable Court advised my person that my application for 

writ of habeas corpus was denied without a written order, however, I was not aware of the disposition, as I was never given 

the (White-card) here at the TDCJ- Polunsky unit mailroom. 

Furthermore, at the present time, the unit mailroom is not 

wanting to assist me in this manner, as they are requesting 

that my attorney request this information through the Texas 

Open Record Act, in order to obtai~ a date in whi~h this Honorable Court sent my person the white-notice of the dismissal 

of my post-conviction 11.07 pursuant to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. 

Thamk you for any and all assistance you may offer at this 

as I am 'now' well over my one year statute of limitation under 

AEDPA. should you have any questions please· contact my person 

at the addres below. 

3 '6\ L \= M "?:, S"b SaLt\-~ 

L\·--t~'""'<js-\u .. ~t<- '1'1 '3S\ 

Sincerely 

·~c,\c\C\j_ )j~~~± 

1.
Exhibit 32(a)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kansas Gas and Electric Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the
Report), which this certification accompanies, William B. Moore, in my capacity as Chairman of the Board and President (Principle Executive Officer) of the Company, and Mark A. Ruelle, in my capacity as Vice President and Treasurer (Principle
Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: |  | November 10, 2003 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ William B. Moore                                                                     
|----- |  | ----------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|      |  |                   |  |  |  |     |  | William B. Moore, Chairman of the Board and President (Principal Executive Officer)      
|      |  |                   |  | 
|Date: |  | November 10, 2003 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark A. Ruelle                                                                       
|      |  |                   |  |  |  |     |  | Mark A. Ruelle, Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Case 1:07-cv-03493-CM Document 6 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### MILLARD v. HOFFMAN, BUTLER & ASSOC.

No. 197 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 327.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 14 July 1976.
Case 1:07-cv-03413-LAP Document 31 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 6714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2343]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Initial Review Group, Biomedical Research and Research 
Training Review Subcommittee A.
    Date: March 3, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Four Points by Sheraton Bethesda, 8400 Wisconsin Avenue, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Carole H. Latker, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher 
Building, Room 3AN-18, Bethesda, MD 20892, (3010 594-2848, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#157974617e706776557b7c7278663b7b7c7d3b727a63"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5b373a2f303e29381b35323c362875353233753c342d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 1, 2005.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-2343 Filed 2-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE v. EVERHART

No. 22 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 260.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 1 September 1976.