alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 227 (Monday, November 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 71323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23344]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Core 
Center Grants (P30).
    Date: December 12-13, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Yan Z. Wang, MD, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal 
and Skin Diseases, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 820, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 594-4957, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7f081e1118064e3f121e16135111161751181009"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fb8c9a959c82cabb969a9297d5959293d59c948d">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 18, 2005.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-23344 Filed 11-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from Kellwood Company and Subsidiaries Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheet at July 31, 2000, and from the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Earnings and Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended July 31,
2000, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                          14,347
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  326,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,408
<INVENTORY>                                    450,961
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               817,258
<PP&E>                                         259,533
<DEPRECIATION>                                 154,236
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,096,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          258,971
<BONDS>                                        370,537
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       167,554
<OTHER-SE>                                     268,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,096,682
<SALES>                                      1,118,723
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,118,723
<CGS>                                          880,273
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  880,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               179,508
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (38)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,506
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 58,942
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,642
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,642
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.46


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Northern Border Pipeline
Company (the "Partnership") for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
William R. Cordes, as President--Northern Border Pipeline, ONEOK Partners GP,
L.L.C., Operator (functional equivalent to the Partnership's principal executive
officer), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
          and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.


Dated: February 28, 2007                /s/ William R. Cordes
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        William R. Cordes
                                        President--Northern Border Pipeline,
                                        ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and
not for any other purpose.
Exhibit 32.1


                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of ISA Internationale Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Bernard L. Brodkorb, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, in
the capacities and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1.) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the
periods presented.


By: /s/ Bernard L. Brodkorb
Bernard L. Brodkorb,
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: January 13, 2010

Note: This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the 10-K as a
separate disclosure statement.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff per request.
Case 1:07-cv-03238-AKH Document 22 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03238-AKH Document 22 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 10240 and # 10241]
 AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of North Carolina, dated November 4, 2005. *Incident:*
                         Tropical Storm Tammy. *Incident Period:*
                         10/07/2005 through 10/09/2005. *Effective Date:*
                         11/04/2005. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         01/03/2006. *EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         08/04/2006.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: Small Businesss Administration, National Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: Primary Counties: Beaufort, Brunswick. Contiguous Counties: North Carolina: Columbus, Martin, Pender, Craven, New Hanover, Pitt, Hyde, Pamlico, Washington. South Carolina, Horry. The Interest Rates are: PercentHomeowners with credit available elsewhere
5.375Homeowners without credit available elsewhere
2.687Businesses with credit available elsewhere
6.557Businesses & small agricultural cooperatives without credit available elsewhere
4.000Other (including non-profit organizations) with credit available elsewhere
4.750Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit available elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10240 6 and for economic injury is 10241 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are North Carolina, South Carolina. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: November 4, 2005. Hector V. Barreto, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 05-22536 Filed 11-10-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Case 1:06-cr-00477-LBS Document 15 Filed 05/16/2008 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:06-cr-00477-LBS Document 15 Filed 05/16/2008 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:06-cr-00477-LBS Document 15 Filed 05/16/2008 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:06-cr-00477-LBS Document 15 Filed 05/16/2008 Page 4 of 4
#### STATE v. PASSMORE

No. 202 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 5.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 29 August 1978.
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

In the Matter of N.B., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, PORTLAND 

PERFORMANCE CLUSTER, Portland, OR, 

Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 22-0092

Issued: October 27, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Daniel Goodkin, Esq., for the appellant

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER GRANTING FEE PETITION

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

Counsel for appellant has filed a fee petition in the amount of $4,360.00.

1

 The Board notes 

that all petitions for approval of fees for representatives’services are considered under the Board’s 

statutory authority found at section 8127 of the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act2(FECA) 

and under its Rules of Procedure found at 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e).3

As required by the Board’s regulations, appellant has been afforded written notice of the 

fee requested and provided an opportunity to comment on the fee petition. 4 Attached to the fee 

petition is a signed acknowledgement by appellant consenting to the fee in the amount of 

$4,360.00.

1 FECA (5 U.S.C. § 8127(b)) and its implementing regulations (20 C.F.R. § 501.9) require the Board to review each 

fee petition on its own merits and with regard to the unique facts and issues of each appeal. 

2

5 U.S.C. § 8127.

3

20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e).

4

Id. 
2

The Board has reviewed the fee petition and finds it is in compliance with the Board’s 

Rules of Procedure.

5

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THATthe fee petition is granted in the amount of $4,360.00.

Issued: October 27, 2023

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

5

Id.
* Circuit Judge of the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.

* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________ No. 00-60070

_______________________

CONTINENTAL GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff,
MARY ANN ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant,

versus WOOLF ESTATE, Estate of Mary Ann Woolf, Defendant-Appellee,
ANDREA JUPE FRANKLIN, Intervenor Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Civil Docket #4:98-CV-94-LN

_________________________________________________________________ November 9, 2000
Before GOODWIN * , GARWOOD, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *2 After hearing oral argument in this case and studying the
briefs and pertinent portions of the record, we are persuaded that
the district court’s thorough and painstaking opinion contains
neither clear factual error nor any error of law. The judgment is

AFFIRMED essentially for the reasons stated by the district court.
- 

DOCUMENT 

P.C. 

BY TELCOPIER (212) 805-7917 

May 24.2007 

Honorable Robert P Patterson, I? 

Unitcd States Judne 

United States ~lsrrict Court 

500 Pearl. Street 

New York, New York 10007 

Re: ES&G Tradlng, Inc. v. Sun Capital, Tnc. 

Un;ted States District Court: Southern D~strict ofNcw York Case No. 07CV 3371 (Re) 

Dear Judge Panerson: 

On May 10. 2007 1 adv!sed you that according to 1;Iorida counsel for Sun Capital, Tnc., a 

settlement has been reached betwcen the partics. By this line I had hoped to have a wrirlcn 

settlsmenl agreenlcnt which provides for a discontinuance of this action to follow shortly 

~hereaftcr. 

It appears hat settlement negotiations remain on track. I have just spoken with both Florida 

counscl for Sun Capital, Inc. and Peta tIon, Esq. [who represents ES&G Trading, Inc. - 

although not yet in this action]. Mr. Hon advised me that he hoped and expects the settlement 

would be docu~nented soon [the alternative being bankruptcy for ES&G. something whicll he ii 

trying to avoid]. 

Mr. Hort further advised me that he expects to substitute in on this matter, if necessary, but 

cannot naw do so because of a personal family emergency and requested my indulgence in 

attempting to adjourn this matter to allow for a resolution. 

Currently, a conference is scheduled for tomorrow, May 24,2007 at 9:30 a.m. I have orally 

advised Mr. Monteagudo of the impending settlemcnt and Mr. Hort's personal situation and I:? 

requested I write this letter, nnd suggest tha~ we give ourselves several weeks to [hopefully 

finally] document the settlement. 

f 

If an adjourned date for he confcl~cnce is required, 1 am n\railabie June 5,6, 7, or 14, 2007. 

Unfortunately Mr. Nort was not in a position to cxatnine his oaleniar whec we spoke. 

contact mc regard~ng anyth~ng further that 15 requ~rcd. 

Case 1:07-cv-03371-RPP Document 4 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 19      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 1 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 19      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 2 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 19      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 3 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 19      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 4 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 19      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 5 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 19      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 6 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 19      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 7 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 19      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 8 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 19      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 9 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 19      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 10 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 19      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 11 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 19      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 12 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 19      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 13 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 19      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 14 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 19      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 15 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 19      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 16 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 19      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 17 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 19      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 18 of 19

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 19      Filed 11/02/2007     Page 19 of 19
#### Thomas Bradwell, Administrator De Bonis Non of Charles Daberko v. Samuel R. Wilson, Administrator of Leonard North, with Will Annexed.

1. justices of the *Peace—Jurisdiction in Actions Against Executors and*Administrators.—Justices of the peace have no jurisdiction in actions against executors or administrators as such.

Memorandum.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Abner Smith, Judge, presiding. Heard in that court on appeal from a justice of the peace. Heal'd in this court at the October term, 1894, and affirmed.

Opinion filed December 20, 1894.

James A. Peterson, attorney for appellant.

Walter Sayler, attorney for appellee.

Mr. Justioe Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The appellant is the administrator of one estate, and the *163appellee of another. The intestate represented by the appellant, recovered a judgment against the appellee as administrator before a justice of the peace, which the justice directed should be paid “ as a claim of the seventh class in due course of administration.”

This judgment was presented to the Probate Court by petition, praying that it be allowed as a claim of that class against the estate. The Probate Court and the Circuit Court on appeal denied the prayer, and the appellant has appealed to this court.

The only question is, has a justice of the peace jurisdiction of an action against an administrator upon an alleged cause of action against his intestate ?

It is not inconsistent with the letter of any statute to affirm or deny such jurisdiction, nor does a review of former legislation-help us to an answer; but the premises upon which the Supreme Court in Darling v. McDonald, 101 Ill. 340, base- the argument by which the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court of suits against executors and administrators is affirmed, do not exist when the inquiry is as to the jurisdiction of a justice. The chapter “Abatement,” relates only to courts of record, and the provision in Sec. 18 of the chapter “ Garnishment,” for bringing in the legal representatives of a deceased garnishee, clearly refers to Sec. 11 of the “Abatement” chapter. There is no constitutional provision as to the jurisdiction of justices. In but two counties of the State are there Probate Courts; in all the other counties the probate business pertains to the County Courts, and also they have jurisdiction of appeals from justices. The gross inconsistency of permitting the inferior tribunal in one line to dictate to the superior tribunal in that line what its action shall be in another line is manifest, and the great inconvenience of subdividing the settlement of estates among more than a hundred justices of this county would be intolerable. Klokke v. Dodge, 103 Ill. 125.

Our judgment is that justices of the peace have no jurisdiction of actions against executors or administrators, and the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
1The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3779

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Ronald Lee Williams, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: March 4, 1999

 Filed: March 9, 1999

___________

Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Ronald Lee Williams appeals from the district court’s1

 order

denying his request for waiver of the fine imposed as part of his 1990 sentence. After

careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm, substantially for the

reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.1

         CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Raike Financial
Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), William J. Raike,
III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Melissa L.
Whitley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do
each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to his and her knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and
     results of operations of the Company.



/s/William J. Raike
--------------------------------------
William J. Raike, III
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 26, 2004



/s/Melissa L. Whitley
--------------------------------------
Melissa L. Whitley
Chief Financial Officer
March 26, 2004
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOEL MORENO,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 

 State.

 

§

§

§

 

§

§

§ 

 

§

'

'

No. 08-16-00003-CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20090D03245)

 O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief 

until August 19, 2016. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE 

APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime E. Gandara, the Appellant’s Attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 19, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 19

th day of July, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.