alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-01-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,933
<ALLOWANCES>                                       200
<INVENTORY>                                      4,538
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,671
<PP&E>                                           2,106
<DEPRECIATION>                                     795
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,193
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           172
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,851
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,050
<SALES>                                         18,237
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,237
<CGS>                                           16,239
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,006
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 150
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (159)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (159)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (159)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)



</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 18 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 18 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 18 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03423-SCR Document 3 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03423-SCR Document 3 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 3 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 4 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 5 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 6 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 7 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 8 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 9 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 10 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 11 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 12 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 13 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 14 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 15 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 16 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 17 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 18 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 19 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 20 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 21 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 22 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 23 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 24 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-33 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 25 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-18 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-18 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-18 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 3 of 3
#### BENJAMIN ANTHONY SALAS, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 8540

December 24, 1975

543 P.2d 1343

*Morgan D. Harris,*Public Defender, and *Kelly H. Swanson,*Deputy, Clark County, for Appellant.

*803
      *Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *George E. Holt,*District Attorney, and *H. Leon Simon,*Deputy, Clark County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Benjamin Anthony Salas duly and timely appeared in a magistrate’s court in Las Vegas for a scheduled preliminary examination on a burglary charge.

Although the criminal complaint alleged that Salas had, during the night, broken and entered a “shed” in the backyard of premises occupied by the alleged victim, and removed certain goods therefrom, the only evidence of record showed that the “goods” were picked up by Salas from a nearby vacant lot at midday.

The chief prosecution witness was the occupant of the premises where the alleged burglary took place. She testified that she was not the owner of the goods which were allegedly taken and that she could not identify them.

At this juncture the prosecuting attorney, under the ostensible authority of Bustos v. Sheriff, 87 Nev. 622, 491 P.2d 1279 (1971), gave sworn testimony that he was “surprised” that the occupant of the premises was not the victim of the “alleged” burglary. On the basis of the sworn statement the magistrate granted, over objection, the prosecuting attorney’s motion to continue the hearing.

Salas then sought, but was denied, habeas and in this appeal he contends we must reverse. We agree.

In McNair v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 434, 514 P.2d 1175 (1973), we charted the case history of the court’s concern “that criminal accusations should proceed or terminate on principles compatible with judicial economy, fair play and reason; . . .” Id., 89 Nev. at 438, 514 P.2d at 1177. There, we also noted that our opinion in *Bustos,*allowed a continuance to be granted for legitimate emergencies. For example: “. . . if surprised by absence of a subpoenaed witness, a prosecutor may orally move *804for continuance on his own sworn testimony.” Id., 89 Nev. at 438, 514 P.2d at 1177.

Here the necessary *witness had not been subpoenaed*and the prosecutor offered no legal reason for his failure to arrange for the appearance of the necessary witness and to have been prepared to go forward with the preliminary examination.

The magistrate should not have granted the continuance; accordingly, we reverse and remand this case to the district court with instructions to grant the petition for the writ of habeas corpus.
#### BOYER v. BOYER

No. 34 PC.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 637.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 April 1974.
Case 7:07-cv-03336-SCR     Document 6      Filed 07/09/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 3 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 4 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 5 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 6 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 7 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 8 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 9 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 10 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 11 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 12 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 13 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 14 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 15 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 16 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 17 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 18 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 19 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 20 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 21 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-16 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 22 of 22
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 9- 00 36 8- CV IN THE I NT ER EST OF M .L. H. , A Chi ld Fr om the 166th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-CI -04068 Honora ble Andy Mireles, Judge Pre siding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Phy lis J . Speedlin, J ustice

Rebec ca Simmons, J ustice Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Deliver ed and F iled: Aug ust 26, 2009 DI SMI SSED FOR L ACK OF J URI SDI CTI ON The trial court signed a final j udg ment on Marc h 10, 2009. There fore , the notice of appea l was due to be fil ed on Apr il 9, 2009, thirty day s after

the date the judgme nt was sig ned. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.1. A motion fo r ex t en s i o n of time to file the notice of appea l was due on A

pril 24, 2009, fiftee n day s after

the dea dline for f

iling notice of

appea l. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.3. Appellant filed her notice of appea l, and a motion for ex tension of t ime to file the notice of appea l, on J une 22, 2009, well af

ter the f ifteen- day g rac e per iod allowed by

Rule 26.3. T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.3. On July 22 , 2 00 9, a ft e r t

he cle rk ’s re c or d w a s f

ile d, we or de re d a

pp e lla nt t o s ho w c a

us e in writing why

this appeal should not be dismissed for lac k of jurisdiction. Appellant responds that she04
- 09
- 00 36 8- CV

- 2- is now proce ed i n g pro se a nd was not ser

ved with notice of

any court da tes. Howe ver, “ once the period for

g ranting a motion for extension of time under Rul e [ 2 6
. 3 ] h as passed, a party can no longe r inv o k e t h e appe llate cour t’s jurisdiction.” See V

erburgt v. Dorne r , 959 S.W .2d 615, 617 (T e x. 19 97 ) (c on str

uin g the pr e de c e sso r t o Ru le 26 ); In re Es tat e of P ad ill a , 103 S.W .3d 563, 567 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). Ac cording ly , we deny appellant’ s motion t o extend the time to file the notice of appea l a nd dismiss the appe al for la ck of jurisdiction. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42 .3 (a ). Cos ts o f a

pp e a l a re ta xed

a g a ins t a pp e lla nt.

PER C URI AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,084
<SECURITIES>                                    73,338
<RECEIVABLES>                                       22
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                              78
<DEPRECIATION>                                      50
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,732
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            43
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,472
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   495
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   899
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 318
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (722)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (722)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (722)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.99)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. JEFFERIES

No. 88 PC.

Case below: 16 N.C. App. 235.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 December 1972.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32(b)
-------------

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     I, Mark J. Plush, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Keithley
Instruments, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:

     (1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
     December 31, 2003 which this certification accompanies fully complies with
     the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
     of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



/s/ Mark J. Plush
--------------------------------------------
Mark J. Plush
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
February 13, 2004


A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Keithley
Instruments, Inc. and will be retained by Keithley Instruments, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## NO. 12

- 18

- 00231

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE:

MICHAEL L. D ORSETT §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO

. 2

HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM
This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).

On August 24, 2018, the C lerk of this Court notified Appellant that the filing fee in this
appeal is due. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5. Appellant was informed that failure to remit the filing fee

on or before September 4, 2018 , would result in the Court’s taking appropriate action, including

dismissal of the case without further notice. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c). The date for remitting
the filing fee has passed, and Appellant has not complied with the Court’s request.
Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).
Opinion delivered September 26 , 2018. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

( PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

SEPTEMBER 26 , 2018

NO. 12

- 18

- 00231

- CV

IN RE: MICHAEL L. DO RSETT

Appeal from the County Court at Law No

. 2
of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 00122

- CCL2

- 18)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being
considered, it is the opinion of this C ourt that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this
appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed ; and that this decision be certified to the court below

for observance.

By per curiam opinion

.

Pan el consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
exhibit10rsunonassociate.htm


Exhibit 10.4



 

J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC. 2009 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN









NOTICE OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD

-- NON-ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR ANNUAL GRANT --









                                             Name:





 

Restricted Stock Unit Grant

A restricted stock unit grant for -------- units was granted to you on -----------.   Each restricted stock unit shall at all times be deemed to have a value equal to the then-current fair market value of one share of J. C. Penney Company, Inc. Common Stock of 50¢ par value (“Common
Stock”).  This grant is subject to all the terms, rules, and conditions of the J. C.  Penney Company, Inc. 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“Plan”).  In the event of a change in capitalization of the Company or other similar event, the number of units shall be adjusted as provided in the Plan.





You will be credited with a quarterly distribution of an amount equivalent to the dividend declared on Common Stock on the restricted stock units until such time as the units are converted to shares of Common Stock.  Any such dividends shall be converted into a number of additional restricted stock units equal to the aggregate
dividend which would have been paid with respect to the number of restricted stock units then credited to you under this grant divided by the closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the day on which such dividends are paid. Any such additional restricted stock units shall vest at the same time as the restricted stock units granted hereunder.





Payment Date

Upon your separation from Board service, the restricted stock units will vest. Your vested restricted stock units shall be paid out in shares of Common Stock as soon as practicable following the date of your separation from Board service.  You shall not be allowed to defer the payment of your shares of Common Stock to a
later date.  If your separation from Board service is for any reason other than a Qualifying Termination as defined in the Plan, the restricted stock units will be forfeited. The beneficiary listed on your J. C. Penney Company, Inc. Beneficiary Designation Form will receive the vested shares upon separation due to death.





Taxes

At the time the Company issues to you, in cancellation of the restricted stock units, shares of Common Stock, the fair market value of the shares on the vesting date (the closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange, or if the Common Stock does not trade on such date, the closing price reported in the composite
transaction table on the last trading date immediately preceding such date) multiplied by the number of vested shares will be reported to the Internal Revenue Service on a Form 1099.  The fair market value is subject to Federal Income Tax and Social Security Self-Employment Tax.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the quarterly report of Berry Plastics Corporation (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 29, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, James M. Kratochvil, the Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.








/s/ James M.
Kratochvil


James M.
Kratochvil


Executive
Vice-President, Chief Financial


Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary





Date:                      February
11, 2008
Construction

Toolbox Talk Aerial Lifts Safety 

Aerial lifts include scissor lifts, boom lifts, and bucket 

trucks. Here are some reasons why construction workers 

are killed or injured every year while using this equipment:

• They were not wearing a harness and fell off the equipment.

• They fell with the equipment when it tipped over.

• They were electrocuted when the equipment touched

a power line or electrical wires.

Al’s Story 

Al was working in a boom lift to reach a sign he 

needed to repair. The sign was located near some 

electrical wires. Al was not provided with a body 

harness. While he was working, the truck shifted. Al 

lost his balance, fell 20 feet to the ground, and died. 

# What caused this incident? 

# How could this have been prevented?

# Have you ever been injured while using an aerial 

lift or do you know someone who has? If so, 

what happened?

Remember This

Before operating an aerial lift:

• Check operating and emergency controls.

• Follow the manufacturer’s instructions and set

outriggers, brakes, and wheel chocks, even if on a level

surface that won’t shift. Never exceed manufacturer’s

slope limits.

• Look for potential hazards such as potholes, bumps, or

debris that could cause the lift to tip over.

• Avoid contact with overhead hazards such as electrical

wires or power lines.

• Ask your supervisor to make sure that electrical wires or

power lines near the work area have been de-energized.

• Close lift-platform chains/bars or gates, and check

guardrails. OSHA requires guardrails on scissor lifts.

• Check personal fall protection equipment. If there are

signs of damage, your employer should give you new

equipment.

• Look for leaks of air, hydraulic fluid, and fuel.

• Always follow the procedures in the user manual.

• Set up cones and signs as work zone warnings, if working

near traffic.

While operating an aerial lift: 

• Always close lift-platform chains/bars or gates.

• Always wear fall arrest equipment with a lanyard

attached to a designated anchor point.

• Always stand on the floor of the bucket. Do not climb

on or lean over the guardrails.

• Do not exceed the load limits. Do not drive an aerial

lift with the lift extended, unless it is designed for that

purpose.

How can we stay safe today?

What will we do at the worksite to prevent injuries from aerial lifts?

OSHA Standard: 1926.453. OSHA considers aerial lifts to be supported scaffolds.
Construction

Toolbox Talk Aerial Lifts Safety 

; Always set outriggers, brakes, and wheel chocks – even if on a level surface.

; Always stand on the floor of the bucket. Do not climb on or lean over the guardrails.

; Always wear fall arrest equipment with lanyard attached to a designated anchor point.

; Avoid contact with overhead hazards like electrical wires or power lines.

GET 

INFORMATION

CDC/NIOSH INFO: 1-800-CDC-INFO (1-800-232-4636) | TTY: 1-800-232-6348 | cdc.gov/info | cdc.gov/niosh

CPWR: Contact 301-578-8500 | cpwr-r2p@cpwr.com | www.cpwr.com/toolbox-talks

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2022-127 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB2022127 | August 2022
Allonge to Promissory Note to Joseph Hines



 Exhibit 10.54 
 ALLONGE TO 
 PROMISSORY NOTES 
 TO JOSEPH HINES 
 This Allonge (the “Allonge”), dated as of
September 30, 2009, is attached to and forms a part of the following Promissory Notes (collectively, the “Notes”), made by SPHERIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), payable to the order
of JOSEPH HINES, an individual residing in the state of Arizona (the “Holder”): 
  

	 	1.	Promissory Note dated March 1, 2009, in the original principal amount of $60,000. 

  

	 	2.	Promissory Note dated May 1, 2009, in the original principal amount of $10,000. 

 The Notes are hereby amended to provide that they are due and payable in full on December 31, 2009. 
 In all other respects, the Notes are confirmed, ratified, and approved and, as amended by this Allonge, shall continue in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Holder have caused this Allonge to Promissory Note to be executed and delivered by their respective duly authorized officers as of the date and year first above written. 

 

			
	SPHERIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Michael Kirksey
		 	Michael Kirksey
	Its:	 	Executive Vice President and COO


  

	
	JOSEPH HINES
	
	/s/ Joseph Hines