alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 71858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23491]



[[Page 71858]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality


Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), announcement is made of a Health Care 
Policy and Research Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting.
    A Special Emphasis Panel is a group of experts in fields related to 
health care research who are invited by the Agency for Healthcare 
Research and Quality (AHRQ), and agree to be available, to conduct on 
an as needed basis, scientific reviews of applications for AHRQ 
support. Individual members of the Panel do not attend regularly-
scheduled meetings and do not serve for fixed terms or a long period of 
time. Rather, they are asked to particpate in particular review 
meetings which require their type of expertise.
    Substantial segments of the upcoming SEP meeting listed below will 
be closed to the public in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(6). Grant applications for ``The Building Research 
Infrastructure Capacity'' (BRIC) RFA, are to be reviewed and discussed 
at this meeting. These discussions are likely to reveal personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications. 
This information is exempt from mandatory disclosure under the above-
cited statutes.

    SEP Meeting on: The Building Research Infrastructure Capacity 
(BRIC) RFA.
    Date: December 15-16, 2005 (Open on December 15 from 8 a.m. to 
8:15 a.m. and closed for the remainder of the meeting).
    Place: Doubletree Hotel, Executive Meeting Center, Rockville, 
Maryland 20850.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, 
agenda or minutes of the non-confidential portions of this meeting 
should contact Mrs. Bonnie Campbell, Committee Management Officer, 
Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority Populations, 
AHRQ, 540 Gaither Road, Room 2038, Rockville, Maryland 20850, 
Telephone (301) 427-1554.
    Agenda items for this meeting are subject to change as 
priorities dictate.

    Dated: November 21, 2005.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 05-23491 Filed 11-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10607 Summary Calendar

JAMES PRESTON HOPEWELL, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:95-CV-965-X

- - - - - - - - - - April 26, 1999 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * James Preston Hopewell, Texas prisoner # 300023, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. Hopewell alleged that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his trial attorney allowed him to be tried on six felony charges before one jury. We have reviewed thoroughly the briefs, the record, and the applicable law, and hold that Hopewell has failed to show thatNo. 97-10607 -2- counsel’s alleged errors were both deficient and prejudicial. See Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). Accordingly, he is not entitled to habeas relief on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel. AFFIRMED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Recent News & Stories             
  -  News Releases             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS Oklahoma Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Jones, F.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7914

RODNEY MOUCELL JONES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; JONATHAN E. OZMINT, Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections; HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-05-865-0) Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 30, 2006 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney Moucell Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General; Samuel Creighton Waters, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Rodney Moucell Jones, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss Jones’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as untimely filed. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Sl ack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JOHN RHODES

No. 152A81

(Filed 3 March 1982)

DEFENDANT appeals from a decision by a divided panel of the Court of Appeals1 affirming his conviction of resisting an officer in violation of G.S. § 14-223 upon which he was sentenced to a term of six months imprisonment at the 3 November 1980 Session of Superior Court, GUILFORD County.

*Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General by Daniel F. McLawhorn, for the State.*

*Malcolm R. Hunter, Jr., Assistant Appellant Defender, for the Defendant-Appellant.*

1

. *State v. Rhodes,*54 N.C. App. 193, 282 S.E. 2d 809 (1981).

*295PER CURIAM.

An adequate review of the evidence is contained in the opinion by the Court of Appeals. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in (1) failing to instruct the jury on the defendant’s right to resist an arrest pursuant to an illegal entry into his home, (2) instructing the jury that the defendant’s right to resist excessive force was conditioned on their finding that both Officer Hastings and Officer Workman used excessive force against the defendant, and (3) failing to instruct the jury on defendant’s right to resist an arrest by an officer who does not inform the defendant that he is under arrest.

We have carefully reviewed the opinion of the Court of Appeals and the briefs and authorities relating to the defendant’s contentions set out above. We conclude that the result reached by the Court of Appeals, its reasoning, and the legal principles enunciated by it are correct and adopt that opinion as our own.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Case 1:07-cv-03413-LAP Document 20 Filed 10/25/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03413-LAP Document 20 Filed 10/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (the Company) for the period ended October 31, 2009, I, D. Michael Parker, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended October 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended October 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 11, 2009



/s/ D. Michael ParkerD. Michael Parker Senior
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
#### COOKE v. COOKE

No. 71 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 124.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 December 1977.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2316

OLGA PANKINA; DMITRIJS HOHLOVS,

Petitioners,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A95-450-025; A95-450-026)

Submitted: August 27, 2007 Decided: September 12, 2007

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

H. Raymond Fasano, MADEO & FASANO, New York, New York, for

Petitioners. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M.

Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Jonathan Robbins, Office

of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*Although the Petitioners filed their motion as a “motion for

reconsideration,” the Board properly found that the motion was in

substance a motion to reopen.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Olga Pankina, a native of the former Soviet Republic and

a stateless citizen, and her husband, Dmitrijs Hohlovs, a native

and citizen of Latvia, petition for review of an order of the Board

of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying their motion to reopen*

their immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the

Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion

in denying the Petitioners’ motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a)

(2007); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly,

we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the

Board. See In Re: Pankina, Nos. A95-450-025; A95-450-026 (B.I.A.

Nov. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.18 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended August 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Michael Jones, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



R. Michael Jones
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
November
30, 2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANDREW THOMAS TUBBS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 200 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
CC Filed by Filing Services Canada Inc. 403-717-3898


AMENDMENT NO.  TO

NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT




This Amendment No. 1 to Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (“Amendment”) is entered into as of this 31st day of October 2008 by and between Micron Enviro Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and Bradley Rudman.




RECITALS:




WHEREAS, the parties entered into the Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of November 2, 2007 (“Option Agreement”). Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Option Agreement; and




WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Option Agreement as set forth herein.




AGREEMENT:




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:




1.  In exchange for Grantee’s promise of continued service in his capacity as a director and president of the Corporation, Section 4 of the Option Agreement shall be amended to extend the Option expiry period to November 1, 2009.




2.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same document.




3. Except as so expressly amended, the Option Agreement is ratified and confirmed by the parties and, as hereby amended, shall be deemed and construed as a single instrument in full force and effect; provided, however, in the case of any conflict or inconsistency between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the prior Option Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 to Option Agreement as of the date set forth above.




Micron Enviro Systems, Inc.

Micron Enviro Systems, Inc.

  Bradley Rudman







By:

/s/ Stephen J. Amdahl

/s/ Bradley Rudman

Name:  Stephen J. Amdahl

Title: 

Director
#### YODER v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

No. 62 PC.

Case below: 7 N.C. App. 712.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 12 June 1970.
Order entered March 8, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00784
- CV
TONYA PARKS AND PARK S REALTY FIRM, LLC, Appellant s V. AFFILIATED BANK , Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 15
- 04540
- C



### O RDER The Court abated this appeal on December 20, 2017, so that the trial court could make findings relating to whether Tonya Parks, individually and on behalf of Parks Realty Firm, LLC (PRF), voluntarily entered into an agreement under rule of civil procedure 11, pursuant to which Parks and PRF forfeited their right to bring this appeal, and whether any agreement is enforceable. The trial court held a hearing o n February 16, 2018, and entered findings of fact and conclusions of law on February 27, 2018. Following the hearing, Parks and PRF requested the opportunity to brief and argue issues relating to (1) the trial court’s rulings on objection s made during the February 16, 2018 hearing , and findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (2) this Court’s orders of December 20, 2017, and February 18, 2018, relating to the abatement of this appeal.We REINSTATE this appeal. We GRANT , in part, Parks and PRF’s reques t for

additional briefing. By March 23, 2018 , Parks and PRF may file a brief, not exceeding fifteen pages, raising only issues relating to the trial court’s rulings on obj ections at the February 16, 2018 hearing and the trial court’s February 27, 2018 fin dings of fact and conclusions of law. Affiliated Bank may file any response, not exceeding fifteen pages, by April 9, 2018 . Parks and PRF may file any reply, not exceeding five pages, by April 16, 2018 . No extensions to these deadlines will be entertain ed. Oral argument on the supplemental issues will not be permitted.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS PRESIDING JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32**

 

**FORM 10-Q**

 

**Section 1350 Certifications**

 

**Quarter ended September 30, 2005**

 

I, Herbert Lindo, Chairman,President and Principal Financial Officer of Kenilworth Systems Corporation(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)     the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the third quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)     the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Dated:   November 18,2005

 

 
|   | /s/  Herbert Lindo                                    |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Herbert  Lindo                                        |
|   | Chairman,  President and Principal  Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 23.1



                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Form
S-3 Nos. 33-22990, 33-38210, 33-51588 and 33-61624 and the Registration
Statement Form S-8 Nos. 33-86078, 33-27288 and 33-38209 of Jackpot Enterprises,
Inc. of our report dated October 4, 2001, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedules of J Net Enterprises, Inc. (formerly known
as Jackpot Enterprises, Inc.) included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended June 30, 2001.


                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

                              New York, NY
                              October 15, 2001
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 16 Filed 03/12/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 16 Filed 03/12/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 16 Filed 03/12/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 16 Filed 03/12/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 16 Filed 03/12/2008 Page 5 of 5