alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-3452

___________

Leonardo Cabera De Leon, *

*

Petitioner, *

* Petition for Review of

v. * an Order of the Board

* of Immigration Appeals.

Alberto Gonzales, United States *

Attorney General, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Respondent. *

___________

Submitted: June 13, 2006

Filed: June 16, 2006

___________

Before ARNOLD, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Leonardo Cabera De Leon (petitioner), a native and citizen of Guatemala,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), affirming

the decision of the immigration judge (IJ), who denied his requests for asylum and

withholding of removal.

Because the BIA summarily affirmed without an opinion, we review the IJ’s

decision as the final agency decision, applying the substantial-evidence standard of

review. See Mamana v. Gonzales, 436 F.3d 966, 968 (8th Cir. 2006). We treat the

IJ’s credibility findings as conclusive unless contrary to what a reasonable adjudicator
-2-

would have been compelled to find, and we will reverse only if petitioner has shown,

based on the evidence, that no reasonable adjudicator could have reached the same

decision. See id. 

Upon review, we hold that the evidence reasonably supports the IJ’s adverse

credibility determination. We further agree with the IJ that the evidence fails to show

past persecution or a likelihood of future persecution on account of political opinion,

much less a likelihood of future persecution throughout Guatemala on account of

political opinion. See Mohamed v. Ashcroft, 396 F.3d 999, 1002-06 (8th Cir. 2005)

(denying petition for review where evidence suggested that attacks on petitioner’s

home were part of generalized looting and banditry, and not on account of her

membership in her social clan, and where petitioner failed to proffer evidence that she

would be persecuted on account of her clan membership throughout her homeland).

The petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1865 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to make certain changes with respect 

to bringing a civil action for the misappropriation of a trade secret, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 13, 2019 

Ms. HARRIS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to make certain 

changes with respect to bringing a civil action for the 

misappropriation of a trade secret, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Deterring Espionage 

5 by Foreign Entities through National Defense Act of 

6 2019’’ or the ‘‘DEFEND Act’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1865 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF TRADE SECRETS. 

2 Chapter 90 of title 18, United States Code, is amend3 ed— 

4 (1) in section 1836— 

5 (A) in subsection (b)(3)(C), by striking ‘‘2 

6 times’’ and inserting ‘‘3 times’’; and 

7 (B) in subsection (d), in the first sentence, 

8 by striking ‘‘3 years’’ and inserting ‘‘5 years’’; 

9 and 

10 (2) in section 1837— 

11 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

12 the end; 

13 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking the pe14 riod at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

15 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(3) the offense causes substantial economic 

17 harm in the United States.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Construction

Toolbox Talk Preventing Falling Objects

Being struck by falling objects is a leading cause of 

construction fatalities. Even a small object can cause 

serious or fatal injuries if it falls from a higher level.

Ted and Sara’s Story 

Ted was working on a scaffold. He laid down his 

hand tool and it slipped off the edge of the scaffold 

and hit Sara on the shoulder. Sara suffered cuts and 

bruises.

# What caused this incident? 

# How could this have been prevented?

# Have you ever been struck by a falling object on 

a jobsite, or do you know someone who has? If 

so, what happened? 

Remember This

• Always secure all tools in elevated work areas if they 

are close to leading edges.

• Secure hand tools, such as with a tool lanyard or 

holster, to prevent them from falling to a lower level.

• Secure loads before lifting and moving them with lifts 

or cranes.

• Do not hoist or pass loads over people.

• Stack materials neatly to keep them from toppling 

over. 

• Ask your employer to use a debris net or place toe 

boards on all scaffolding and open edges to prevent 

tools and materials from falling onto workers below.

• Always wear a hard hat and other appropriate personal 

protective equipment. 

How can we stay safe today?

What will we do at the worksite to prevent injuries from falling objects?

OSHA Standard: 1926.501(c)
Construction

Toolbox Talk Preventing Falling Objects

; Secure all tools close to leading edges in elevated work areas.

; Secure hand tools with a tool lanyard or holster to prevent them from falling.

; Always wear a hard hat.

GET 

INFORMATION 

CDC/NIOSH INFO: 1-800-CDC-INFO (1-800-232-4636) | TTY: 1-800-232-6348 | cdc.gov/info | cdc.gov/niosh

CPWR: Contact 301-578-8500 | cpwr-r2p@cpwr.com | www.cpwr.com/toolbox-talks

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2022-134 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB2022134 | August 2022
#### ENTERPRISES, INC. v. EQUIPMENT CO.

No. 213 PC.

No. 97 (Fall Term).

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 204.

Petition by third-party plaintiff Equipment Co. for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 23 August 1979.
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATIONS

I, Charles E. Drimal, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of PrimeEnergy Corporation, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PrimeEnergy Corporation.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

          a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit  committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);

          a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of  internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

August 11, 2005  
/s/ Charles E. Drimal Jr.   
-------------------------------------
  
Charles E. Drimal Jr   
Chief Executive Officer   
PrimeEnergy Corporation
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

ANTONIO L. GREEN , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 190

[ August 18, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Caroline C. Shepherd

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2000

- CF

- 009683

- AXXX

- MB

.
Louis G. Carres, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed. See Brooks v. State , 969 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 2007).

C ONNER , C.J., W ARNER and L EVINE , JJ., CONCUR

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7828

CHARLES PATRICK MAMANUS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE; MAJOR REDMAN; LIEUTENANT

BOYERS; D. CAMPBELL, Lieutenant; ASSISTANT

WARDEN HOLLER; ASSISTANT WARDEN DAY; L. M.

SAUNDERS; L. W. HUFFMAN; SERGEANT SAMPSON; M.

PETERS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RIDGEWAY; OFFICER

BURDETTE; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SNEAD,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-02-817-7)

Submitted: April 18, 2003 Decided: May 6, 2003

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Patrick McManus, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Patrick McManus appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action.

The district court dismissed the complaint without prejudice

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). Because McManus may

amend his complaint to state a viable claim, the dismissal order is

not final and thus is not subject to appellate review. See Domino

Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67

(4th Cir. 1993).

We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument wold no

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

**Exhibit 31.1**

 

            I, HarryLee Waterfield II, certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2007 of Kentucky Investors,Inc.;

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.         The registrant's othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and we have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared,

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation, and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal controls overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.         The registrant's othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

 

(a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financialinformation; and

 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 

| Date:			August 10, 2007
By:			
/s/Harry			Lee Waterfield II  
Harry Lee			Waterfield II  
President
 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, Predoctoral Research Training Grant in Biostatistics.                    

*Date:*                         March 4, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                              ( print page 6714)    

*Place:*                         Four Points by Sheraton Bethesda, 8400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Carole H. Latker, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Room 3AN-18, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-2848,                         *latkerc@nigms.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 1, 2005.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-2342 Filed 2-7-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### STATE v. HALL

No. 111.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 616.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 October 1978.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 227 (Monday, November 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71333-71334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23389]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act; Proposal Review; Notice of Meetings

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces its 
intent to hold proposal review meetings throughout the year. The 
purpose of these meetings is to provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support. The 
agenda for each of these meetings is to review and evaluate proposals 
as part of the selection process for awards. The review and evaluation 
may also include assessment of the progress of awarded proposals. The 
majority of these meetings will take place at NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, Virginia 22230.
    These meetings will be closed to the public. The proposals being 
reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, 
including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) 
of the Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF will continue to review the 
agenda and merits of each meeting for overall compliance of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act.
    These closed proposal review meetings will no longer be announced 
on an individual basis in the Federal Register. NSF intends to publish 
a notice similar to this on a quarterly basis. For an advance listing 
of the closed proposal review meetings that include the names of the 
proposal review panel and the time, date, place, and any information on 
changes, corrections, or cancellations, please visit the NSF Web site: 
http://www.nsf.gov/events/advisory.jsp. This information may also be 
requested by telephoning 703/292-8182.


[[Page 71334]]


    Dated: November 22, 2005.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-23389 Filed 11-22-05; 4:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 70898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23250]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following meetings during the week of 
November 28, 2005:

    An Open Meeting will be held on Tuesday, November 29, 2005 at 10 
a.m. in Room L-002, the Auditorium, and a Closed Meeting will be 
held on Wednesday, November 30, 2005 at 10 a.m.

    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c),(3), (5), (7), (9)(B), and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a), (3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10) permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Atkins, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session.
    The subject matter of the Open Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, 
November, 29, 2005 will be:

    The Commission will consider whether to propose amendments to 
the proxy rules under Section 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934. The proposed amendments would provide an alternative model by 
which companies conducting proxy solicitations could satisfy the 
Rule 14a-3 requirement to furnish proxy materials by posting those 
proxy materials on an Internet Web site and providing shareholders 
with notice of the Internet availability of the materials. Other 
soliciting persons also would be permitted to follow the proposed 
alternative model.

    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, 
November 30, 2005 will be:
    Formal orders of investigations; Institution and settlement of 
injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature;
    Opinions; and a
    Regulatory matter bearing enforcement implications.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: November 18, 2005.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-23250 Filed 11-18-05; 4:07 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P