alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.3

                           ARTICLES OF CORRECTION TO

                         ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF

                                 EXPEDIA, INC.


          THESE ARTICLES OF CORRECTION of the Articles of Incorporation of
Expedia, Inc. (the "Corporation") are herein executed by said Corporation,
pursuant to the provisions of RCW 23B.01.240, as follows:

          FIRST:  The documents filed with the Secretary of State to be
corrected are the Corporation's Articles of Incorporation, originally filed on
August 23, 1999 (the "Articles of Incorporation").

          SECOND:  Due to a typographical error in the Articles of
Incorporation, Article VIII erroneously refers to the Corporation's "Class B
Common Shares".

          THIRD:  Article VIII of the Articles of Incorporation is therefore
corrected to read as follows:

                        "SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETINGS"

          Special meetings of the shareholders of the Corporation for any
     purpose or purposes may be called at any time by the majority vote of the
     holders of Common Shares, by the Board of Directors, by a committee of the
     Board of Directors which has been duly designated by the Board of Directors
     and whose powers and authority, as provided in a resolution of the Board of
     Directors or in the bylaws of the Corporation, include the power to call
     such meetings, but such special meetings may not be called by any other
     person or persons."

          The foregoing is executed under penalty of perjury by the undersigned,
who is authorized to do so on behalf of the Corporation.

          DATED this 9th day of August, 2001.

                                       Expedia, Inc.


                                       By:  /s/ Mark S. Britton
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Mark S. Britton
                                            Sr. Vice President, General Counsel
                                            and Secretary

                                       1
The H onorable William Brevard Hand, United States District Judge for th e 1 Southern District of Alabama, sitting by designation. The Honorable Richard H. Battey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for 2 the District of South Dakota.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 98-1474

_____________ Kenneth J. McKee, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED] * * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: November 19, 1998 Filed: November 27, 1998

_____________ Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, LOKEN, Circuit Judge, and HAND, District Judge. 1

_____________ PER CURIAM. Kenneth J. McKee appeals the judgment of the District Court, which affirmed 2 the Commissioner's denial of McKee's claim for social security disability benefits.-2-

Having considered the appeal, we conclude that no error of law appears, and that the Commissioner's decision is supported by substant ial evidence in the record as a whole. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed. See8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
----

EXHIBIT 4.27

Consulting Agreement

Between:

Robert Tomjlenovic;

And

Global Precision Medical Inc. ("Global")

WHEREAS Robert Tomjlenovic has financial contacts in the United Statesthat are potential sources of capital for the Company in its ongoing operations,Global hereby enters into a limited consulting agreement whereby in return forarranging meetings and introductions, Tomjlenovic, on a case by case basis atthe sole discretion of Global, will be compensated in the following manner:

> - Telephone expenses.   
- Travel expenses in the event that Tomjlenovic is required to accompany    representatives of Global to meetings arranged by him.   
- Finders fees on verifiable capital contributions to the treasury of the    Company, such fees to be set by the Board of Directors of Global on a case    by case basis and in accordance with various regulatory requirements.

Undertakings

Tomilenovic undertakes to represent himself as an independent consultant andnot an officer, director or employee of Global and will use only informationfully disclosed to the public in informing potential investors of the Company ofthe merits of such an investment.

Agreed to this3rd day of October 2002 by:

/s/ Robert Tomjlenovic Robert Tomjlenovic 

/s/  Lindsay Semple      Lindsay SempleCEO - GLOBAL PRECISION MEDICAL

----
deficiency action. Specifically, petitioners contend that the district court

has indicated its intention to grant real party in interest's application for a deficiency judgment. Petitioners further contend that the district court has indicated its intention to deny petitioners' motion to continue an NRS 40.457 valuation hearing. In this writ petition, petitioners ask that this court order the district court to vacate these two anticipated orders.

A writ of mandamus is available to compel the performance of an act that the law requires or to control an arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion. NRS 34.160; Int? Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008). A writ of prohibition may be warranted when the district court exceeds its jurisdiction. NRS 34.320. Either writ is an extraordinary remedy, and whether such petitions will be considered is within our sole discretion. Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). Writ relief is not available when an adequate and speedy legal remedy exists, and the right to appeal is generally considered to be such a remedy. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004). Moreover, it is petitioners' burden to demonstrate that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. Id. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844.

Having considered petitioners' writ petition and appendix, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted at this time. Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Preliminarily, the absence of written orders makes it impossible to determine the extent to which the district court may have abused its discretion, Rust v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist., 103 Nev. 686, 688-89, 747 P.2d 1380, 1382 (1987) (recognizing that an oral ruling is ineffective for any purpose), and we are unable to otherwise infer from the documents in petitioners' appendix what the

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2J. 

## (: 

# ■ 5 2_2 1e„

,J. Saitta district court's reasoning may have been. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (requiring a petitioner's appendix to include all documents "that may be essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Moreover, with respect to the issues raised in the writ petition, petitioner has not demonstrated that an appeal would be an inadequate legal remedy. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 228, 88 P.3d at 841, 844. Accordingly, we deny the writ petition.

It is so ORDERED. 1

cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Connaghan Newberry Law Firm Mazur & Brooks, A PLC Eighth District Court Clerk

'In light of our order, petitioners' emergency motion for stay is denied as moot.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) I947A 3
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 6 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 6 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 6 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 6 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 6 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 6 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 6 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 6 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 6 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 6 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 6 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 11 of 11
#### BOWEN v. RENTAL CO.

No. 59 PC.

Case below: 16 N.C. App. 70.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 5 December 1972.
Case 1:07-cv-03210-PKC Document 22 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 23.2
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-148326 and 333-51468) and Form F-3 (No. 333-101502) of Workstream Inc. of our report dated November 14, 2008, relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Workstream Inc. for
the year ended May 31, 2009.  Our report dated November 14, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2008 included an emphasis paragraph relating to an uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
 
 /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
 Orlando, Florida
 September 14, 2009
Your health is priceless

You work hard to 

get ahead but...

Stand up for yourself! Protect your health and that of your co-workers.

cdc.gov/niosh/topics/protejase/ Cent

and 

Natio

Safet

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2023-118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB2023118

March 2023
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-1490

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Joshua Walker lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________ Submitted: December 09, 2020 Filed: December 14, 2020 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Joshua Walker appeals after he pleaded guilty, under a plea agreement containing an appeal waiver, to conspiring to transport stolen vehicles andfelon-in-possession charges, and the district court 1 imposed a within-Guidelines

sentence. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence as an abuse of discretion and as substantively unreasonable. We will enforce the appeal waiver in this case because Walker entered into the plea agreement and the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily, his arguments fall within the scope of the appeal waiver, and no miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the waiver. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (discussing enforcement of appeal waivers). Further, we have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal falling outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal based on the appeal waiver, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1904 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1904

    To prohibit the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development from 
 implementing, administering, or enforcing a proposed rule relating to 
                    verification of eligible status.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 19, 2019

Mrs. Gillibrand introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development from 
 implementing, administering, or enforcing a proposed rule relating to 
                    verification of eligible status.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keeping Families Together Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of 
Housing and Urban Development may not implement, administer, enforce, 
or in any manner make effective the proposed rule of the Department of 
Housing and Urban Development entitled ``Housing and Community 
Development Act of 1980: Verification of Eligible Status'' (84 Fed. 
Reg. 20589 (May 10, 2019)), or any final rule based substantially on 
such proposed rule.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE v. NELSON

No. 159 PC.

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 235.

Petition by defendant for disretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 14 July 1978.
#### STATE v. KAPLAN

No. 2.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 410.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 February 1975. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 February 1975.
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 1 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 2 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 3 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 4 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 5 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 6 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 7 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 8 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 9 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 10 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 11 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 12 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 13 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 14 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 15 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 16 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 17 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 18 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 19 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 20 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 21 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 22 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 23 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 24 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 25 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-8 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 26 of 26
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 224 (Tuesday, November 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70587-70591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23069]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 06-13]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604-
6575.

[[Page 70588]]

    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 06-13 with attached transmittal and policy 
justification.

    Dated: November 16, 2005.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 70589]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN22NO05.001


[[Page 70590]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN22NO05.002


[[Page 70591]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN22NO05.003

[FR Doc. 05-23069 Filed 11-21-05; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
<TABLE>
                                                                                                 EXHIBIT 12

                     KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY
        Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                (in thousands except ratio data)
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                    Twelve
                                                                                                    Months
                                                              Year Ended December 31,               Ended
                                                  1995       1996       1997       1998      1999   6/30/00
<S>                                             <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Fixed Charges:
  Interest on First Mortgage Bonds . . . . . .  $19,090    $14,914    $14,867   $13,936   $12,712   $10,624
  Interest on Other Long-term Debt . . . . . .    2,422      6,446      8,597    12,188    13,525    15,450
  Interest on Short-term Debt. . . . . . . . .    2,242      2,849      3,034     2,455     2,552     3,303
  Miscellaneous Interest Charges . . . . . . .      510        555        559       634       869     1,062
  Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals.      700        800      1,700     1,500     1,200     1,200
       Total Fixed Charges . . . . . . . . . .  $24,964    $25,564    $28,757   $30,713   $30,858   $31,639

Earnings:
  Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  $25,128    $16,973    $20,746   $21,676   $25,430   $24,727
  Plus Federal Income Taxes. . . . . . . . . .    3,914      5,119      9,415     9,785    12,993    12,572
  Plus State Income Taxes. . . . . . . . . . .    1,420        598      2,190     2,096     2,784     3,344
  Plus Fixed Charges (as above). . . . . . . .   24,964     25,564     28,757    30,713    30,858    31,639
       Total Earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . .  $55,426    $48,254    $61,108   $64,270   $72,065   $72,282

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges . . . . . .     2.22       1.88       2.12      2.09      2.33      2.28
</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-15066-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15066-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15066-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15066-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15066-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15066-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15066-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15066-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15066-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15066-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15066-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15066-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15066-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Case 7:07-cv-03232-CS-LMS     Document 9      Filed 02/25/2008     Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Professional Certification and Licensure Advisory Committee has scheduled a meeting for December 9, 2005, in Conference Room 542, Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Benefits Administration, 1800 G Street, NW., Washington, DC, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on the requirements of organizations or entities offering licensing and certification tests to individuals for which payment for such tests may be made under Chapters 30, 32, 34, or 35 of title 38, United States Code.

The meeting will begin with opening remarks by Ms. Sandra Winborne, Committee Chair. During the morning session, there will be a presentation on the usage of the license and certification test reimbursement benefit, and discussions about system updates and outreach activities. The afternoon session will include any statements from the public (scheduled for 1:30 p.m.) old business, and any new business.

Interested persons may file written statements to the Committee before the meeting, or within 10 days after the meeting, with Ms. Stacey St. Holder, Designated Federal Officer, Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Benefits Administration (225B), 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420. Anyone wishing to attend the meeting should contact Ms. Stacey St. Holder or Mr. Michael Yunker at (202) 273-7187.

Dated: November 17, 2005.

By direction of the Secretary.

E. Philip Riggin,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-23209  Filed 11-22-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
#### MOORE v. STEVENS & CO.

No. 47 PC

Case below: 47 N.C. App. 744

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 November 1980.
AVIGEN,
INC.


AMENDMENT 
TO

MANAGEMENT
TRANSITION PLAN


This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Avigen,
Inc. Management Transition Plan (the “Plan”) is effective as of August 20,
2009, provided that the majority of the Plan participants who are officers
subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
approves the Amendment in a manner satisfying the requirements of Section 11 of
the Plan. 

     WHEREAS, Section 11 of the
Plan provides that the Company may amend the Plan and any Management Transition
Plan Eligibility Notice at any time; and 

     WHEREAS, the Board deems it
advisable to amend the Plan and each Management Transition Plan Eligibility
Notice of each Plan participant, as set forth herein. 

     NOW, THEREFORE, Section 4(a)(ii)
of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety, to read as follows:


“Stock Option Vesting and
Exercisability. Any accelerated vesting and
extended exercisability of your outstanding stock options to acquire common
stock of the Company shall be as set forth in the Management Transition Plan
Eligibility Notice; provided,
however, that notwithstanding any term or
provision in any Management Transition Plan Eligibility Notice to the contrary,
in no event shall the exercisability of any stock option be extended beyond the
effective date of a corporate transaction in which the option will not be
assumed or substituted and as a result, pursuant to the terms of the equity
incentive plan under which such option was granted, will expire if not exercised
not later than immediately prior to such effective date.”