alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### DUKE POWER COMPANY, Petitioner v. GERA P. SYKES and Wife, RUBY E. SYKES, Respondents.

(Filed 12 June 1964.)

Appeal by petitioner from *Hall, J.,*January 1964 Civil Session of ORANGE.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment imposing liability for the amount fixed by a jury as fair compensation for easements acquired in the construction of petitioner’s electric transmission line from Jamestown to Eno.

*William I. Ward, Jr., Carl Horn, Jr., Sawyer & Loftin and Graham & Levings for petitioner appellant.*

*Bryant, Lipton, Bryant & Battle for respondent appellees.*

PeR Curiam.

All of the assignments of error are directed to this question: What is the rule which a jury should use when determining the compensation a public service corporation must pay when it takes an easement in the property of another? The rule was concisely stated in *Proctor v. Highway Commission,*230 N.C. 687, 55 S.E. 2d 479. The rule there stated has been reiterated in many subsequent cases. 2 N.C. Index 203, n. 64. Tersely stated, the gauge for measurement is the difference in market value before and after the taking. The court so instructed the jury.

Petitioner does not assign as error the rule as given. It merely contends the jury might have misunderstood and used a rule of measurement more favorable to defendants. When the charge is considered as an entirety, rather than as detached sentences, it is, in our opinion, in*306conceivable that a jury should have misunderstood. Petitioner has not shown prejudicial error. *Redevelopment Commission v. Hinkle,*260 N.C. 423, 132 S.E. 2d 761.

No error.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Katy Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending
October 2, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, James W. Shaffer, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ James W.
Shaffer


James W.
Shaffer


Chief
Financial Officer


November
13, 2009
#### STATE v. ALLRED

No. 88 PC.

Case below: 21 N.C. App. 229.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 June 1974. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 June 1974.
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 5 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### TELEGRAPH CO. v. HOUSING AUTHORITY

No. 149 PC.

Case below: 38 N.C. App. 172.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 January 1979.
Case 1:07-cv-03364-LAK Document 3 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70879-70880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23180]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-1098 (Preliminary)]


Liquid Sulfur Dioxide From Canada

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Revised schedule for the subject investigation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 17, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Russell Duncan (202-708-4727), Office 
of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street 
SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need 
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact 
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information 
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its 
Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this 
investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket 
(EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted the subject 
investigation in response to a petition filed on September 30, 2005, by 
Calabrian Corporation, Kingwood, Texas (70 FR 58747, October 7, 2005). 
Subsequently, the U.S. Department of Commerce (``Commerce'') extended 
the date for its initiation of the investigation (70 FR 61937, October 
27, 2005). Commerce's Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigation: 
Liquid Sulfur Dioxide from Canada was published in the Federal Register 
on November 17, 2005 (70 FR 69735), thereby providing notice to the 
Commission of its initiation of the subject investigation. Accordingly, 
the Commission will transmit its determination in the preliminary phase 
of this investigation to Commerce within 25 days of November 17, 2005. 
The Commission's views are due at Commerce within five business days 
thereafter.
    For further information concerning this investigation see the 
Commission's notice cited above and the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201) and 
part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207).

    Authority: This investigation is being conducted under authority 
of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 
pursuant to section 207.12 of the Commission's rules.


[[Page 70880]]


    Issued: November 18, 2005.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-23180 Filed 11-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<TABLE>
                                                                                                 EXHIBIT 12

                     KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY
        Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                (in thousands except ratio data)
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                    Twelve
                                                                                                    Months
                                                              Year Ended December 31,               Ended
                                                  1991       1992       1993       1994      1995   9/30/96 
<S>                                             <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Fixed Charges:                                                                                    
  Interest on First Mortgage Bonds . . . . . .  $11,064    $13,275    $17,472   $19,090   $19,090   $16,176
  Interest on Junior Subordinated 
    Deferrable Interest Debentures . . . . . .     -          -          -         -        2,422     3,488
  Interest on Other Long-term Debt . . . . . .    9,345      7,668      2,033      -         -        1,681
  Interest on Short-term Debt. . . . . . . . .      856        413      1,001     1,621     2,242     2,692
  Miscellaneous Interest Charges . . . . . . .    1,027        861        523       485       510       539
  Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals.      800        800        800       700       700       700
       Total Fixed Charges . . . . . . . . . .  $23,092    $23,017    $21,829   $21,896   $24,964   $25,276
                                                                                                  
Earnings:                                                                                         
  Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  $28,465    $26,537    $18,031   $25,273   $25,128   $22,332
  Plus Federal Income Taxes. . . . . . . . . .    5,662      1,465      1,620     2,178     3,914     6,496
  Plus State Income Taxes. . . . . . . . . . .    2,389      1,891      1,116     1,154     1,420     1,561
  Plus Fixed Charges (as above). . . . . . . .   23,092     23,017     21,829    21,896    24,964    25,276
       Total Earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . .  $59,608    $52,910    $42,596   $50,501   $55,426   $55,665

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges . . . . . .     2.58       2.29       1.95      2.30      2.22      2.20
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.02**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Whitney InformationNetwork, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2007as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K”),I, Anne M. Donoho, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Form 10-K fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Form 10-Kfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Anne M. Donoho      |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Anne M. Donoho          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | January 15, 2009        |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-03273-RJH Document 9 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03273-RJH Document 9 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03273-RJH Document 9 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03273-RJH Document 9 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03273-RJH Document 9 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03273-RJH Document 9 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03273-RJH Document 9 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03273-RJH Document 9 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03273-RJH Document 9 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 9 of 9
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Symyx Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Steven D. Goldby, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely forpurposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United Stated Code,that to the best of my knowledge:

1)               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates andfor the periods indicated.

ThisCertification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with theSecurities and Exchange Commission.
|        | By:    | /s/ STEVEN D. GOLDBY    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Steven D. Goldby        |
|   |   | Chairman of the Board,  |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | March 6, 2006      |

 

----
Case 1:06-cv-15155-AKH Document 6-2 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of DirectorsinterWAVE Communications International, Ltd.:

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the registration statements (No. 333-109831, 333-101427,333-96613, 333-87142, 333-63854, and 333-38690) on Form S-8 of interWAVECommunications International, Ltd. (interWAVE) of our report datedSeptember 25, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of interWAVECommunications International, Ltd. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2003,and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity andcomprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year periodended June 30, 2003, and the related financial statement schedule, whichreport appears in the June 30, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of interWAVE.

 

Our report datedSeptember 25, 2003 contains an explanatory paragraph describing theCompany’s change in accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets.

 
|   | /s/ KPMG LLP |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|

 

Mountain View, CaliforniaOctober 11, 2004

 

----
#### JERNIGAN v. LEE

No. 44 PC.

Case below: 9 N.C. App. 582.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 16 December 1970.
#### STATE v. McKOY

No. 70 PC.

Case below: 16 N.C. App. 349.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 January 1973.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,231
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,765<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    118,477
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               236,435
<PP&E>                                         191,272
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,961
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 480,950
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,251
<BONDS>                                        155,789
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           32,900
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,822
<OTHER-SE>                                     143,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   480,950
<SALES>                                        413,466
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               413,466
<CGS>                                          294,599
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  405,025
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,799<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,457
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,913)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,183)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,183)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)
<FN>
<F1>Net of Allowances
<F2>Includes equity in Loss of operations to be disposed of, ($897)
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. ABSHER

No. 64 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 197.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 December 1977.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 13.2
                                                                    ------------

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Celanese AG (the
"Company") for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report"), the
undersigned, Peter Jakobsmeier, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 30, 2005

  By:  /s/ Peter Jakobsmeier
----------------------------
Name: Peter Jakobsmeier
Title: Chief Financial Officer
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Kreisler Manufacturing Corporation (the Company) does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
December 31, 2007 (the Report) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                         |  | 
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Date: February 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Michael D. Stern    |  | 
|                        |  | Michael D. Stern        |  | 
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|                        |  |                        
|Date: February 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Edward A. Stern     |  | 
|                        |  | Edward A. Stern         |  | 
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer |  | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



33
Case 1:07-cv-03388-MGC     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 1 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-03388-MGC     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 2 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-03388-MGC     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 3 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-03388-MGC     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 4 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-03388-MGC     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 5 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-03388-MGC     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 6 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-03388-MGC     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 7 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-03388-MGC     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 8 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-03388-MGC     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 9 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-03388-MGC     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 10 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-03388-MGC     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 11 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-03388-MGC     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 12 of 13

Case 1:07-cv-03388-MGC     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 13 of 13
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Marine Accounted For From Korean War (Johnson, B.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 29, 2010 

s0322 

Order 

 

March 29, 2010 

139849 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139849 

 COA: 291500 

Wayne CC: 02-000556-01 

ANTONIO HINTON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 27, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).