alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**FORM 10-Q**

**Section 1350Certifications**

**Quarterended June 30, 2007**

I, Herbert Lindo,Chairman, President and Principal Financial Officer of Kenilworth SystemsCorporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of myknowledge:

(1)               theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the third quarter endedJune 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)               theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August14, 2007
|        | /s/ Herbert Lindo                                              |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Herbert Lindo                                                  |
|   | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00425-CV

In re Ronny Gene Smith

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Ronny Gene Smith, an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal 

Justice, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of miscellaneous issued related to 

his prosecution and conviction. Having reviewed the petition and the record provided, we deny 

the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

The petition does not make clear the precise nature of the relief sought or the 

person or persons to whom the requested writ should issue. To the extent Smith seeks relief 

that is within this Court’s jurisdiction to grant, it is the relator’s burden to properly request 

and establish entitlement to such relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex.

1992); In re Roberts, No. 03-12-00513-CV, 2012 WL 3629367, at *2 (Tex. App.—Austin 

Aug. 21, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.); see Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.—

Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (“Even a pro se applicant for a writ

of mandamus must show himself entitled to the extraordinary relief he seeks.”). “In this 

regard, the relator must provide the reviewing court with a record sufficient to establish his 
2

right to mandamus relief.” Roberts, 2012 WL 3629367, at *1 (citing Walker,

827 S.W.2d at 837; In re Blakeney, 254 S.W.3d 659, 661 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2008,

orig. proceeding)); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k) (specifying required contents for 

appendix), 52.7(a) (requiring relator to file with petition “a certified or sworn copy of every 

document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any 

underlying proceeding”). Smith, however, has not provided this Court with any copies of

his motions or any other documents, let alone file-stamped copies to show that a properly 

filed motion is pending before the trial court.

Based on the record that Smith has provided, we conclude that he has failed to 

show his entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny his petition for writ of 

mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Rosa Theofanis, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Theofanis

Filed: July 21, 2023
#### STATE v. COX

No. 706P82.

Case below: 59 N.C. App. 239.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 28 January 1983.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**FORM 10-Q**

 

**Section 1350Certifications**

 

**Quarterended September 30, 2009**

 

I, Herbert Lindo,Chairman, President and Principal Financial Officer of Kenilworth SystemsCorporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)             the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofthe Company for the third quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)             the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  November 12,2009

 
|   | /s/ Herbert Lindo                                              |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Herbert Lindo                                                  |
|   | Chairman, Chief  Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
### NUMBER 13 - 14 - 00 5 0 8 - C R 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ DAVID VASQUEZ , Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.

__________________________________ __________________________

On a ppeal from the 11 7 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________ 

## O R D E R

Be fore Justices Benavides , Perkes , and Longoria

Order Per Curiam This cause is before the Court on appellant’s motion to remand to trial court for new trial, the State’s response and motion to abate appeal, and appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the brief. Th e reporter’s record consisting of four volumes was filed with this Court on October 28, 2014. The reporter has notified this Court that volume 5, consisting of the exhibits, cannot be filed because the exhibits are not in her possession2

and cannot be located. Appellant states the lost exhibits were original exhibits and cannot be replaced by agreement. The State has responded that it may be possible to obtain duplicate exhibits , or the exhibits may be located. Because of the unknown status of the exhibits , we GRANT the State’s motion to
abate and remand. Appellant’s motion for new trial is CARRIED WITH THE CASE.
Th is appeal is ABATED and the matter is REMANDED to the trial court. In accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6(f)(4), the trial c ourt is directed to conduct a hearing to determine: (1) if the appellant has timely requested a reporter's record; (2) if, without the appellant's fault, a significant exhibit or a significant portion of the court reporter's notes and records has been los t or destroyed or

- if the proceedings were electronically recorded

- a significant portion of the recording has been lost or destroyed or is inaudible; (3) if the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the reporter's record, or the lost and destroyed ex hibit, is necessary to the appeal's resolution; and (4) if the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the reporter's record cannot be replaced by agreement of the parties, or the lost or destroyed exhibit cannot be replaced either by agreement of the par ties or with a copy determined by the trial court to accurately duplicate with reasonable certainty the original exhibit. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 34.6(f). The trial court is directed to forward the record of the proceedings, including any orders and findings, to this Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, or to notify this Court within such period indicating a date by which the trial court can comply. Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED pending
resolution o f the matter herein.
It is so ordered.3 PER CURIAM

D o not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
D elivered and filed th e 19th day of December, 2014.
<PAGE>

                                                              Exhibit 99(b)
EXHIBITS:
                                                         January 4, 2000
Jeffrey Erb

       This letter serves to confirm that Kenilworth Systems Corporation
("Kenilworth" or the "Company") will cause to be issued to you, or your
designee, one hundred thousand (100,000) shares of its Common Stock, par value
$.01 per share in full consideration for services you rendered and will render
as a consultant to the Company in connection with all its SEC EDGAR filings
during calendar years 1999 and 2000. This service includes all amended financial
and other statements the Company may have to file as a result of the audit for
the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1999.

       The shares to be issued will be duly and validly issued, fully paid and
non-assessable and will be issued as "Restricted Securities" as that term is
defined under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"),
pursuant to an exemption afforded under Section 4(2) of the Act.

       All corporate action necessary for the issuance for the shares has been
made. The Certificates represented by the Shares will be issued as promptly as
possible after March 30, 2000, the Company's audit reporting date with the SEC.
Each certificate to be issued for the Shares will bear the following legend:

              "The Shares represented by the certificates have not been
       registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Shares have
       been acquired for investment and may not be sold, transferred or assigned
       in the absence of an effective registration statement for the Shares
       under the Securities Act of 1933 or an opinion of the Company's counsel
       that registration is not required under the Act".

       If the aforementioned terms meet with your approval, please execute this
letter agreement and return a copy to us.


KENILWORTH SYSTEMS CORPORATION                ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

/s/ Herbert Lindo                             /s/ Jeffrey Erb
------------------------                      ---------------------
Herbert Lindo, President                      Jeffrey Erb
#### STATE v. NEWCOMB

No. 44 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 595.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 September 1975.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (the Company) for the period ended January 31, 2011, I, D. Michael Parker, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 15, 2011



/s/ D. Michael ParkerD. Michael ParkerSenior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE v. EVANS

No. 365PC

Case below: 46 N.C. App. 607

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss defendant’s appeal for lack of a substantial constitutional question allowed 7 October 1980.
**EXHIBIT32**

 

            Harry Lee WaterfieldII and Raymond L. Carr, being the President and Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer, respectively, of Kentucky Investors, Inc., hereby certify as of this 24thday of September, 2008, that the Form 10-Q/A for the Quarter ended March 31, 2008fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Kentucky Investors, Inc.

 

 

|   | **KENTUCKY			INVESTORS, INC.** 
  
BY:  /s/Harry			Lee Waterfield II 
Harry Lee			Waterfield II
DATE:			September 24, 2008
President 
  
			BY:  /s/Raymond L. Carr 
Raymond L.			Carr
DATE:			September 24, 2008
Vice President			- Chief Financial Officer
  |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXTENSION
AGREEMENT

     

    Arnold
Blair holds a $1,250,000 note made by Nutrition 21, Inc. dated August 25, 2006.
The maturity date of the note is extended through September 14,
2009.

     

    Nutrition
21, Inc. confirms all other provisions of the note and of the security for the
note, including provisions for accelerated maturity on certain
events.

     

    Nutrition
21, Inc. further confirms that the granting of this extension is not a waiver of
any rights under the note or a related security agreement or otherwise available
to you at law or in equity.

     

    This
extension is effective only if and when Mark Stenberg signs an identical
extension agreement for a $1,250,000 note by Nutrition 21, Inc. that he
holds.

     

    Dated:
September 1, 2009

     

    
      
        	
                /s/ Arnold Blair

              	 
      
	
                Arnold
      Blair

              	 
      


      

    

     

    NUTRITION
21, INC.

     

    
      
        
          
            
              
                
                  
                    	
                            By 

                          	
                            /s/ Benjamin Sporn

                          	 
	 	 	 
	 
      	
                            Benjamin
      Sporn

                          	 
	 	 	 
	 
      	
                            Vice
      President
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 11-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 11-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 2 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 11-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 3 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 11-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 4 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 11-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 5 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 11-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 11-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 11-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 8 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 11-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 9 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 11-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 10 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 11-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 11-3 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 12 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 7 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 7 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### SIBBETT v. LIVESTOCK, INC.

No. 79 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 704.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 November 1978.
#### STATE v. FINN

No. 170

Case below: 1 N.C. App. 257.

Petition for writ of *certionari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 23 August 1968.
EXHIBIT 32.2
   CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
  AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PrimeEnergy Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Beverly A.
Cummings, Chief Financial Officer of PrimeEnergy Corporation, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the
Corporation.
     /s/ Beverly A.
Cummings
  Chief
Financial Officer
  March 25, 2009
Case 1:07-cv-03422-RJH Document 4 Filed 05/19/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. NORRIS

No. 191 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 259.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 25 August 1975. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 25 August 1975.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual Report of Gameplan, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated:  March 26, 2008

/s/ Robert G. Berry

Name: Robert G. Berry

Title:  Chief Executive Officer



Dated:  March 26, 2008

s/ Robert G. Berry

Name: Robert G. Berry

Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The ACRS Subcommittees on Reliability and Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) and on Human Factors will hold a joint meeting on December 15-16, 2005, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

The entire meeting will be open to public attendance.

The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

*Thursday, December 15, 2005—8:30 a.m. until the conclusion of business.*

*Friday, December 16, 2005—8:30 a.m. until the conclusion of business.*

The joint subcommittees will examine the current status of human reliability analysis including ATHEANA, SPAR-H, and industry approaches (if available). The Subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff and industry regarding this matter. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.

Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. Eric A. Thornsbury, (Telephone: 301-415-8716) or Dr. John H. Flack, Senior Technical Advisor (Telephone: 301-415-0426) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted.

Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Official between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individuals at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

Dated: November 21, 2005.

Michael R. Snodderly,

Acting Branch Chief, ACRS/ACNW.

[FR Doc. 05-23321 Filed 11-25-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### STATE v. MOORE

No. 104.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 643.

Motion of defendant to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 April 1979.
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC     Document 65      Filed 10/05/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC     Document 65      Filed 10/05/2007     Page 2 of 2
#### McADAMS v. FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO.

No. 37 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 750.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 7 March 1977.
Exhibit 32.1








KINDER MORGAN, INC.


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906


OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Kinder Morgan, Inc. and will be retained by Kinder Morgan, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








Dated:  August 11, 2009

/s/ Richard D. KinderRichard D. Kinder
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Case 1:07-cr-00376-VM     Document 14      Filed 05/14/2008     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-6 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-6 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-6 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 3 of 3