alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Arkados Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andreas Typaldos, Chairman and Acting Chief  and Sole Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 April 4, 2011

/s/ ANDREAS TYPALDOS

Andreas Typaldos

Acting Chief and Sole Executive Officer(defacto chief financial officer)
 
 This certification accompanies the Report and shall not be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 38 Filed 08/17/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 38 Filed 08/17/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 38 Filed 08/17/2007 Page 3 of 3
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-11306

 

ROBERT W. PRZYBYLSKI,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

_______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:97-CV-1667-P)

_______________________________

November 2, 1999

Before GARWOOD, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Robert W. Przybylski (“Przybylski”) appeals from

the district court’s ruling granting appellee United States

Elevator Corporation (“U.S. Elevator”) summary judgment. 

Specifically, Przybylski contends that the district court erred

in holding that he had failed to state a prima facie case for age

discrimination under the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act,

Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 21.051.

We have considered the parties’ arguments and the record,
2

and we agree with the district court that Przybylski’s claim can

be resolved as a matter of law. Przybylski’s claim based on his

transfer fails because under the undisputed facts with respect to

such transfer, the same did not constitute an adverse employment

action. We therefore affirm, essentially for the same reasons as

enunciated by the district court in its opinion issued on October

9, 1998.

To the extent that Przybylski’s claim complains of his

subsequent dismissal, Przybylski offered no evidence to raise a

fact issue with respect to the legitimate, non-discriminatory

reasons for his firing advanced by U.S. Elevator.

AFFIRMED
Case 1:07-cr-00372-LBS     Document 5      Filed 07/03/2007     Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000055373
<NAME> KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      728,408
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     18,376
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         123,218
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         8,560
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  92,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 970,889
<COMMON>                                        50,450
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      158,750
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             67,770
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 276,970
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           271,228
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                 500
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  55,850
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   60,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     12,596
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 3,675
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 290,070
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  970,889
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      176,972
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             6,664
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     144,715
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     151,379
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         25,593
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                (155)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  25,438
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        14,234
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,204
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   11,204
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        14,886
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        6,840
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          24,601
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> All common stock owned by parent company; no EPS required.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Case 7:07-cv-03456-KMK-MDF     Document 13      Filed 07/27/2007     Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of DigitalFX International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Craig Ellins, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



---------------------------------------------
Craig Ellins
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
March 15, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------------- x 

In the Matter of the Application of C.B. on behalf of Z.G. 

her minor child, 

Plaintiff,

-againstDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF 

NEW YORK, 

Defendant.

----------------------------------------------------------------------- x 

NOTICE OF MOTION 

07 CV 3419 (AKH) (THK) 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the annexed Statement of Undisputed Facts 

pursuant to Rule 56.1 of the Local Rules of this Court, dated October 5, 2007, the exhibits 

submitted to the Court on August 17, 2007, and the accompanying memorandum of law in 

support of defendant’s motion for summary judgment dated October 5, 2007, and upon all prior 

pleadings and proceedings, defendant will move this Court, at the United States Courthouse for 

the Southern District of New York, located at 500 Pearl Street, New York, on a date to be 

determined by the Court, for an order pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure awarding it summary judgment, and granting such other and further relief as this 

Court deems just and proper. 

Case 1:07-cv-03419-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, pursuant to the briefing schedule 

entered in this matter on August 6, 2007, opposition papers, if any, shall be served no later than 

October 26, 2007. Reply papers, if any, shall be served no later than November 14, 2007. 

Dated: October 5, 2007 

New York, New York 

MICHAEL A. CARDOZO 

Corporation Counsel of the 

 City of New York 

Attorney for Defendant 

100 Church Street, Room 2-179 

New York, New York 10007 

212-788-0889 

By: /s 

Andrew J. Rauchberg (AR 2179) 

Assistant Corporation Counsel 

To: Neal H. Rosenberg, Esq. 

 Law Offices of Neal Howard Rosenberg 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 9 Murray Street, Suite 4 West 

 New York, New York 11235 

 212-732-9450 

 (via ECF) 

 

-2- 

Case 1:07-cv-03419-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
# Soldier returns home after 47 years

/ Published Nov. 19, 2014

He didn’t want to make a sound, but as U.S. Army Staff Sgt. James Van Bendegom’s heavy boots made way through the patrol route on the border between South Vietnam and Cambodia on July 12, 1967, there was no stopping the rustle of leaves as they made a closer marriage to the ground. And so he trudged along the path following the man in front of him and leading those behind, until they all heard the sound of enemy arms: “pop, pop, pop.”

Van Bendegom and his men were under attack, and though they fought valiantly, they were overrun by the enemy forces. Unable to navigate away from the melee, Van Bendegom was captured and sent to a prisoner of war camp. Through reports brought back by POWs who returned after the war, it was learned that Van Bendegom lost his life from wounds sustained during the attack.

For nearly 47 years, Van Bendegom’s whereabouts were unknown. Though his family understood he would not be returning home from Vietnam, the fact that his remains were unrecovered broadened the sense of hurt surrounding his death. 

That hurt was partially relieved in October 2014 when the scientist at the Central Identification Laboratory in Hawaii positively identified a set of remains in its possession as those belonging to Van Bendegom.

“It helped us in healing,” said Mike Van Bendegom, James’ brother, in regards to the news his brother was identified and would be returned to Wisconsin. Mike was surprised that the search for his brother continued years after his death, and views the efforts of his country and the personnel accounting community to account for his brother as “phenomal.”

James Van Bendegom was an All-American boy who grew up in Wisconsin. Interested in hunting and fishing, he was filled with love for life and love for his country. Dropping out of high school his junior year in order to enlist into the army, Van Bendegom continued the tradition of military service that his father, a World War II veteran, began. 

Mike, now 68, still remembers the time he spent with his brother when they shared bunk beds in his childhood home, and how they delivered newspapers together during their teenage years. Such memories flood back and mingle with the pronounced feeling of loss that he holds when he thinks of James.

"We miss him everyday, and [his identification] brings it to the surface,” said Mike. “[But] thanks to the military for doing this, and thanks for bringing closure to our family.”

It is that sense of closure that gently relieves the void left by losing his beloved brother. 

“He’s looking down on us and smiling that [we] finally got some closure,” said Mike.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Keane, Inc. for the periodended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John J. Leahy, the Executive VicePresident of Finance and Chief Financial Officer and Interim President andChief Executive Officer of Keane, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1.           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, our financial condition and results of operation.
| May 10, 2006 |   | /s/ JOHN J.  LEAHY                                                                                                                                    |
|-------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              |   | John J. Leahy  Executive Vice President of Finance and  Administration and Chief Financial Officer  and Interim President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-8 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-8 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-8 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit 31.1****KOSS CORPORATION****CERTIFICATION***I, Michael J. Koss, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Koss Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation;  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date: February 14, 2006     /s/ Michael J. Koss   Michael J. Koss  Chief Executive Officer, President andChief Financial Officer   * Since Michael J. Koss is both the principal executive officer and the principal financialofficer of the registrant, only one certification is provided.
Exhibit 13.1





Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to


section 906 of the sarbanes-oxley act of 2002





In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Portage Biotech Inc.. for the year ended March 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Declan Doogan as Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.








Date:  July 24, 2014








/s/ Declan Doogan





Declan Doogan


Chief Executive Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 3.3  CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF
THE AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS
OF
SYMYX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.a Delaware corporation  The undersigned, Jeryl L.
Hilleman hereby certifies that:  1.     She is the duly elected and acting
Secretary of Symyx Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company).  2.     Effective March 7, 2005, Article III, Section
3.10 of the Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company was amended to read in
its entirety as follows:  BOARD ACTION BY WRITTEN
CONSENT WITHOUT A MEETING.  Unless
otherwise restricted by the certificate of incorporation or these bylaws, any
action required or permitted to be taken at any meeting of the board of
directors or of any committee thereof may be taken without a meeting if all
members of the board or committee, as the case may be, consent thereto in
writing, or by electronic transmission and the writing or writings or
electronic transmission or transmissions are filed with the minutes of
proceedings of the board, or committee. Such filing shall be in paper form if
the minutes are maintained in paper form and shall be in electronic form if the
minutes are maintained in electronic form.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has set her hand hereto March 7 2005.   /s/ Jeryl L. HillemanJeryl L. Hilleman,Secretary
#### STATE v. GREEN

No. 111.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 86.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 27 November 1974.
Case 1:07-cv-03427-NRB Document 15-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03427-NRB Document 15-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03427-NRB Document 15-2 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 224 (Tuesday, November 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70653-70654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23016]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Policy Statement No. ANM-03-112-06]


Below Deck Cargo Compartment Smoke Penetration Into Occupied 
Areas

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of final policy.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces the 
availability of final policy on smoke penetration tests conducted under 
the provisions of Sec.  25.857.

DATES: The final policy was issued by the Transport Airplane 
Directorate on November 4, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Happenny, Federal Aviation

[[Page 70654]]

Administration, Transport Airplane Directorate, Transport Standards 
Propulsion and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANM-112, 1601 Lind Avenue 
SW., Renton, WA 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2147; fax (425) 227-
1320; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d9aaadbca9b1bcb7f7b1b8a9a9bcb7b7a099bfb8b8f7beb6af"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b0c3c4d5c0d8d5de9ed8d1c0c0d5dedec9f0d6d1d19ed7dfc6">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Disposition of Comments

    A notice of proposed policy was published in the Federal Register 
on February 19, 2003 (68 FR 8073). Seven (7) commenters responded to 
the request for comments.

Background

    The final policy further simplifies the certification process 
pertaining to the acceptable amount of smoke penetration permitted into 
the cabin during a below deck cargo compartment smoke penetration test. 
It clarifies the test criteria for the means of compliance addressed in 
AC 25-9A and supplements that material.
    The final policy as well as the disposition of comments received is 
available on the Internet at the following address: http://www.airweb.faa.gov/rgl. If you do not have access to the Internet, you 
can obtain a copy of the policy by contacting the person listed under 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 4, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-23016 Filed 11-21-05; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 1:07-cv-03465-JFK Document 28 Filed 05/07/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### WEYERHAEUSER CO. v. SUPPLY CO.

No. 204 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 235.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 14 July 1976.