alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X 

TRUSTEES OF THE TEAMSTERS LOCAL 456 

PENSION, HEALTH & WELFARE, ANNUITY, 

EDUCATION & TRAINING, S.U.B. INDUSTRY 

ADVANCEMENT AND LEGAL SERVICES FUNDS and 

THE WESTCHESTER TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 

456, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 -againstREALIFE LAND IMPROVEMENT, INC., 

 Defendant. 

Docket No. 07CV3468 (SCR) 

ANSWER

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X 

 Defendant, by its attorneys Peckar & Abramson, P.C., for its answer to the complaint of 

plaintiff, states the following, on information and belief. 

As To Jurisdiction And Venue

1. Denies knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations

contained in paragraph 4. 

As To Parties

2. Denies knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations

contained in paragraphs 5 through 9. 

3. No response is required to allegations contained in paragraph 8 as the allegations 

make conclusions of law. 

4. Denies knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations

contained in paragraph 9. 

5. No response is required to allegations contained in paragraph 10 as the allegations 

make conclusions of law. 

Case 7:07-cv-03468-SCR Document 6 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

As To The First Claim For Relief

6. Denies the allegations contained in paragraphs 12 and 13 as they call for an 

interpretation of a written document and refers the Court to said document. 

7. Denies the allegations contained in paragraphs 14 through 17. 

8. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 18 as they call for an interpretation 

of a written document and refers the Court to said document. 

9. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 19. 

As To The Second Claim For Relief

10. Repeats the above responses to the allegations incorporated in paragraph 20. 

11. Refers the Court to the law cited in paragraphs 21 and 23 for a determination of 

the allegation. 

12. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 22. 

13. Denies the allegations contained in paragraphs 24 through 26. 

As To The Third Claim For Relief

14. Repeats the above responses to the allegations incorporated in paragraph 27. 

15. Refers the Court to the law and documents cited in paragraph 28 for a 

determination of the allegation. 

16. Denies the allegations contained in paragraphs 29 and 30. 

As To The Fourth Claim For Relief

17. Repeats the above responses to the allegations incorporated in paragraph 31. 

18. Denies the allegations contained in paragraphs 32 through 35. 

 

Case 7:07-cv-03468-SCR Document 6 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

WHEREFORE, plaintiffs’ complaint should be dismissed in its entirety, with such other 

and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 June 21, 2007 

 

 PECKAR & ABRAMSON, P.C. 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 By: /s/Sergey Leonidov 

 Sergey Leonidov (SL-4579) 

 546 Fifth Avenue, 17th Floor 

 New York, NY 10036 

 (212) 382-0909 

Case 7:07-cv-03468-SCR Document 6 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### In the Matter of PHYLLIS LAVERNE ELDRIDGE, 141 Ridge Avenue Born: October 15, 1954

No. 7021DC544

(Filed 18 November 1970)

Infants § 10— undisciplined child — unlawful absence from school — lack of error in proceedings

The district court committed no prejudicial error in proceedings in which a juvenile was adjudged an undisciplined child for being unlawfully absent from school, was placed on probation after each of the first two hearings, and was assigned to the North Carolina Board of Juvenile Correction as provided by G.S. 7A-286(4) (e) after the third hearing.

Appeal from *Alexander, District Judge,*12 June 1970 Session of Forsyth County District Court.

Respondent, a juvenile, was adjudged an undisciplined child by order entered in Forsyth County District Court on 13 February 1970. The adjudication followed a hearing held pursuant to G.S. 7A-285, and was based upon a finding that respondent had been unlawfully absent from school at least 26 days during the 1969-70 school year. The court thereupon ordered respondent placed on probation. One of the conditions of probation was that the child regularly attend school — if not excused for reasons of poor physical or mental health. At a subsequent hearing, respondent was found to have violated this condition; however, she was continued on probation under the additional condition that she not miss any future classes or be tardy to school. On 26 May 1970 a petition was filed seeking review of the case on the ground the child had again violated the terms of her probation by being absent from school without legitimate excuse. On 12 June 1970, after proper notice and hearing, the court made findings to this effect and ordered respondent assigned to the North Carolina Board of Juvenile Correction as provided by G.S. 7A-286 (4) (c). Respondent appealed.

*Attorney General Robert Morgan by L. Philip Covington, Staff Attorney, for the State.*

*R. Glenn Key for respondent appellant.*

*724GRAHAM, Judge.

It is the constant duty of the District Court “to give each child subject to its jurisdiction such oversight and control as will conduce to the welfare of the child and to the best interest of the State.” *In re Burma,*275 N.C. 517, 169 S.E. 2d 879. It' appears that the juvenile here was carefully afforded all constitutional safeguards at every stage of the three separate hearings. *In re Winship,*397 U.S. 358, 25 L.Ed. 2d 368, 90 S.Ct. 1068; *In re Gault,*387 U.S. 1, 18 L. Ed. 2d 527, 87 S.Ct. 1428. Appellant’s contention that the order of 12 June 1970 is unsupported by evidence and based upon improper conclusions is overruled. In all the proceedings affecting this juvenile we find no prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Brock and Morris concur.
Case 1:07-cv-03374-GEL Document 5 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03374-GEL Document 5 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-14994-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

The Board of DirectorsInterwave Communications International Ltd.

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the registration statements (File Nos. 333-38690, 333-59310, 333-59308,333-64854, 333-87142 and 333-96613 and 333-109831) on Form S-8 ofInterwave Communications International Ltd. of our report datedSeptember 25, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets ofInterwave Communications International Ltd. and subsidiaries as ofJune 30, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations,shareholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of theyears in the two-year period ended June 30, 2003, and the relatedfinancial statement schedule, which report appears in this annual report onForm 10-K of Interwave Communications International Ltd. for the yearended June 30, 2003.

 

Our report dated September 25, 2003contains an explanatory paragraph describing the Company’s change in accountingfor goodwill and other intangible assets.

 
|   | /s/ KPMG LLP |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|

 

Mountain View, California*September 25,2003*

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 20 of 20
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL J. PENCE; TAUNI R. PENCE, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

 v. 

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-16607 

D.C. No. 2:14-cv-02587-ROS 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 9, 2017**

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Michael J. Pence and Tauni R. Pence appeal pro se from the district court’s 

order dismissing their diversity action alleging state law claims arising out of the 

foreclosure sale of their property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 

We review for an abuse of discretion the dismissal of an action for failure to 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

FILED

AUG 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-16607 

comply with a court order. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir.

1992). We affirm.

In their opening brief, plaintiffs fail to address how the district court erred by 

dismissing their action for failing to comply with the district court’s order to file an 

amended complaint. As a result, plaintiffs have waived their challenge to the 

district court’s order. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) 

(“[O]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed 

waived.”); Greenwood v. FAA, 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (“We review only 

issues which are argued specifically and distinctly in a party’s opening brief.”).

Because we affirm the district court’s order dismissing plaintiffs’ action for 

failure to comply with the district court’s order, we do not consider plaintiffs’

arguments addressing the underlying merits of the action.

All pending requests and motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of First National Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company"), each certify that, to his knowledge on the date of
this certification:



|Date: March 31, 2008 | By: | /s/ Jerry L. CalvertJerry L. Calvert
President and Chief Executive Officer       
|-------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |     |                                                                                  
|Date: March 31, 2008 | By: | /s/ Kitty B. PayneKitty B. Payne
Executive Vice President/Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
' 

ELE~'~RONIC~LLY FILED 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT C:O~T 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

ORDER 

IN KE: 

Fosarnax Products Liability Litigation 

This Docirment Rckutes to All Cases 

- 

I'I' IS HEREBY ORDERED that Mike Miller of the firm Solberg, Stewart, Millcr & 

Tjon, located at 1129 5"' Avenue South, Fargo, ND 58103, he, and in the sanic hcrchy is, 

Case No: 1 :Oh-MD-1789 

admitted Pro Hur I,'rr.ta as it pertains to the above-referenced ljtigatiorl of this Courl. 

DATED this .!L ' day of May. 20C)S. 

>, , -, -; .' 

BY: ,:( I< . b, , 77(' (- a c=/. ,i 

- ' JOHN F. KEENAN . 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:07-cv-03465-JFK Document 31 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 1 of 2
A0 13hA {Kcv.9!98) Certificate of Good Standing 

United States District Court 

District of North Dakota 

CERTIFICATE OF 

GOOD STANDING 

I, Robert Anslcy, Clerk of this Court, certif). thal 

Mike Miller was duly admitted to 

practicc in this Court on March 9, 1970, 

and is in good standing in this Court. 

Dated at Fargo. Nnrth Ihkota on May 1, 2008. 

Robert finslc\: , 

Clcrk 

, , -. ', ,& 

.C , ..-c ( . , ,: ; ; [. r 

! Dq' Deput), C:lcik - 1,cah Riveland-Foster 

Case 1:07-cv-03465-JFK Document 31 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 16 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03398-BSJ Document 1 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03398-BSJ Document 1 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03398-BSJ Document 1 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 23 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 23 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 28-5 Filed 04/15/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 28-5 Filed 04/15/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-15124-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15124-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15124-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15124-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15124-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15124-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15124-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15124-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15124-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15124-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15124-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15124-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15124-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Ofvo/ft c>iuk> "iP(n%-oi^2. sl&l&oib

l fapn tA)Yvmnq \ki taucxsuo (j& gay umjpt r^ nk\(6U\S 6>wipijU>>

Cmj^l mo's (0/1-7^/7-7?-07 akjO h;fl-?9,???-<3Z,» rtoz (j*rzr

VotA T)rttj P/OTifAJ&L /Quo tori <zio ZAjorioiO-tfrvL Pv/U7di7tM ApnnffjrfCTn

FoFGRIMIMAlATOMS t^/fatf&r /%^g^^^^ ^

FEB Ofi 2015 (T(A4f^J MtoM/QU.< P</£

Aidn& i fcixo Ufijvr .

H>°]l fin, "53 £%

•i^fiiaini i run
AMENDMENT TO


Exhibit 10.7




SECOND AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) dated May 5, 2009 by and between Money4Gold Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), and Daniel Brauser (the “Executive”). 




WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive entered into an employment agreement as of July 23, 2008 (the “Agreement”); and 




WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to amend offices which the Executive holds.




NOW, THEREFORE, the Corporation and the Executive, each intending to be legally bound hereby, do mutually covenant and agree as follows: 




1.

The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:




A.

The first sentence of Section 2 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and the following inserted in lieu thereof:




The Executive shall serve as the Chief Financial Officer with such duties, responsibilities, and authority as are commensurate and consistent with his position, as may be, from time to time, assigned to him by the Board of Directors of the Corporation. 




2. 

The term of the Agreement shall expire on May 5, 2012 unless renewed as provided in the Agreement.




3.

In the event of any conflict between the Agreement and this Amendment, the terms as contained in this Amendment shall control. In all other respects the Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed. 




4.

This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be one and the same agreement. Facsimile signatures shall be treated in all respects and for all purposes as originals.




















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written. 




			
	 
	CORPORATION:


	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	Money4Gold Holdings, Inc.


	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:

	/s/ Hakan Koyuncu


	 
	 
	Hakan Koyuncu


	 
	 
	Chief Executive Officer


	 
	 
	 

	 
	EXECUTIVE:


	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:

	/s/ Daniel Brauser


	 
	 
	Daniel Brauser,












2
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 33 Filed 11/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. CARLISLE

No. 64 PC.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 23.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 May 1975.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of Kimball International,Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Robert F. Schneider, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 

| Date: February 5, 2010 |   |                                                                        |
|------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | /s/ Robert F. Schneider                                                     |
|                   |   | ROBERT F. SCHNEIDER    Executive Vice President,    Chief Financial Officer |
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

# USS Oklahoma Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Furr, T.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### THOMPSON v. WARD

No. 182 PC.

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 593.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 29 August 1978.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS Oklahoma Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Mulick, J.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### STATE v. VIETTO

No. 103 PC.

Case below: 38 N.C. App. 99.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 28 November 1978.
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD     Document 23      Filed 02/04/2008     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03473-GEL     Document 7      Filed 12/12/2007     Page 1 of 1