alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       144,302,703
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   2,666,739
<MORTGAGE>                                  13,127,328
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             168,312,759
<CASH>                                       1,760,811
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             199,900
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      28,467,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             218,906,383
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            167,766,713
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          8,411,741
<POLICY-OTHER>                               1,531,818
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,967,002
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       815,591
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,946,590
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               218,906,383
<PREMIUMS>                                  25,158,342
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          8,493,609
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           (294,448)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 413,022
<BENEFITS>                                  11,533,853
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    472,923
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        20,351,499
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,412,250
<INCOME-TAX>                                   271,065
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,141,185
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                305,275
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   835,910
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
USLX: SDhT 

I 1 DOClJMl73T 

LWI'l'E1) STATES DISTRIC 1- COIIRI' I BLECTgG:;iC?,I,Z 

; E i I 

SOUTlIERN D1STRIC"I' i)F KEW YORK +-* 

iL$: ;-J: <? -f y- cJ, 

/ 1 ._ .......................................................................... ---- .,~y-._ ~i i -* 

IN KII: 

j LIXS'I'EK FILE 

FOSAMAX PKODUCTS LIABl [.IT Y L1'I~lGA'I''IC)N 

: 1 :06-M1)- 1789 (JFK) 

This Dorumeni Rel~ii~>s 7 '0 '11 I1 Act ions 

............................... ............_ I 

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO H.4C VICE 

C'onsidering the C'crtificate of Good Standing and all other documenls required by Casc 

Management Order No. 5 submitted b>- counsel. IT IS 1 1EKt:HY OKDERED that: 

Firn~ Name: Butler, Snow1 O'Mara, SIC\-C~S & Cannada. PLLC 

Address: AmSouth Pla7a. 2 10 Easl Capitol Strcet, Suite 1700 

Email Address: Christy.Jones~~bi~tlersuow.com 

is ddmittcd to practice pro hac vice as counsel li)r Merck & Co., Inc. in the above captioned case 

in the United States District Court for thc Southern District ofNc~\- l'c3rk. 

lie~v York, N~M J'ork 

Ad V -. -- 

~niicd ~[kc~ District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03462-JFK Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 1 of 3
cer-tfy that . - 

MISSISSIPPI 

Christy D. Jones 

CERTIFTCATE OF 

GO00 STANDlNCI 

, Bar # 

, Clerk qf this Court, 

~~as duly udmitted to practice h illis Court OH 

September 30, 1977 , nild is ill good standing 

as o nzemher ofthe Bar oj'this Court. 

Jackson. -- .- - Mississippi . . - - . -- - . - - . 011 March 4, 2008 . . - - -. - -. . -- -- 

/ (JC 11 770 1 1 I., 1 r.r ~ 

Dated (7t 

1. T. NOBLIN 

C'L ERK 

Case 1:07-cv-03462-JFK Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 2 of 3
1. David C:reivs, Clerk ul'tllc United Sratcs District CIourl lbr the Knrthern District of 

Mississippi, cei-ljfj the nttorncy idcrltilied below WJS ciuil aiiillitted tcj pwc~iz;: b~fbi~~ this 

Court vn the date s~atcd and is. 3s of the dart ul this certiti~atc, in good standing as a mcnlber of 

the Bar oi-lhc IJnitcd States Tlislrict Cou~l fur tllc Nort11~1-17 Ilistrict of' hlissis~ippi. 

~).\TL .A D.11 ITTE 11: OC-~ODLR 10,1978 

C;i~:en undcr m>- 11iind and Scal of this I'ourt. 

Case 1:07-cv-03462-JFK Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 3 of 3
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Recent News & Stories             
  -  News Releases             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS Oklahoma Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Flaherty, F.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Exhibit 13

                          O2Micro International Limited

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of O2Micro International Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of Sterling Du,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Perry Kuo, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of his knowledge:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: June 18, 2007

                                        By: /s/ STERLING DU
                                        -------------------
                                        Sterling Du
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: June 18, 2007

                                        By: /s/ PERRY KUO
                                        -------------------
                                        Perry Kuo
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.1


  


CERTAIN INFORMATION
HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THIS EXHIBIT BECAUSE IT IS NOT MATERIAL


AND THE TYPE THE REGISTRANT
TREATS AS PRIVATE OR CONFIDENTIAL.


[***] INDICATES THE
REDACTED PORTION OF THIS EXHIBIT.


  





 



     


     


    

 





 



     


     


    

 





 


Fees and Expenses


 


[***]


 



    Page 3 of 9


     


    

 





 


[***]


 



    Page 4 of 9
#### STATE v. MELVIN CLOER.

(Filed 9 March, 1966.)

Assault and Battery § 13—

In a prosecution for assault, it is error for the court to place the burden upon defendant to prove self-defense.

Mooee, J., not sitting.

Appeal by defendant from *Falls, J.,*August 30, 1965 Criminal Session Gaston Superior Court. The defendant was charged in a warrant with an assault on Robert David Mitchell on August 4, 1965. Upon his conviction in the Municipal Court of Gastonia, he appealed to the Superior Court and upon trial before a jury was found guilty of the charge.

In support of his plea of not guilty, the defendant testified that he acted in self-defense after having been attacked by Mitchell.

The court charged the jury “Applying the principle of self-defense which the Court just read to you, apply that to the evidence in this case; and if you find that — And the defendant is not required to satisfy you of any right of self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt. The only thing he is required to do is to satisfy this Jury that what he did was in self-defense of himself.”

Upon his conviction, sentence was imposed and the defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Millard R'. Rich, Jr., for the State.*

*Frank P. Cooke and Tom D. Efird for the defendant appellant.*

PeR Cubiam.

The defendant was not charged with murder, but an assault. It was error to place on him the burden of proving that *673he acted in self-defense. *S. v. Sandlin,*251 N.C. 81, 110 S.E. 2d 481 and cases there cited.

The defendant is entitled to a

New trial.

Mooee, J., not sitting.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1511 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1511

 To require a mechanism for the regular evaluation by the Air Force of 
justifications for the continuing maintenance of non-operational staff 
        positions in the Air Force that require pilot expertise.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2019

 Ms. Cortez Masto introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
            and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require a mechanism for the regular evaluation by the Air Force of 
justifications for the continuing maintenance of non-operational staff 
        positions in the Air Force that require pilot expertise.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supporting Our Pilots Act''.

SEC. 2. MECHANISM FOR REGULAR EVALUATION BY THE AIR FORCE OF 
              JUSTIFICATIONS FOR THE CONTINUING MAINTENANCE OF NON-
              OPERATIONAL STAFF POSITIONS REQUIRING PILOT EXPERTISE.

    (a) Mechanism Required.--The Secretary of the Air Force shall 
establish a mechanism for the regular evaluation by the Air Force of 
justifications for the continuing maintenance in the Air Force of non-
operational staff positions requiring pilot expertise.
    (b) Report.--Not later than one year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on 
Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report 
on the mechanism established pursuant to subsection (a). The report 
shall include the following:
            (1) A description of the mechanism.
            (2) An assessment of the use and utility of the mechanism 
        through the date of the report.
                                 <all>
```
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 185 

To require certain financial assistance under the State energy program and 

the Weatherization Assistance Program to be distributed without undue 

delay to support State and local high-impact energy efficiency and renewable energy initiatives. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2019 

Mrs. SHAHEEN (for herself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. COONS, and Mr. REED) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require certain financial assistance under the State energy program and the Weatherization Assistance Program to be distributed without undue delay to support 

State and local high-impact energy efficiency and renewable energy initiatives. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Investing in State En5 ergy Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 185 IS

1 SEC. 2. TIMING FOR DISTRIBUTION OF CERTAIN FINANCIAL 

2 ASSISTANCE UNDER THE STATE ENERGY 

3 PROGRAM AND THE WEATHERIZATION AS4 SISTANCE PROGRAM. 

5 (a) TIMING FOR DISTRIBUTION OF FINANCIAL AS6 SISTANCE UNDER THE WEATHERIZATION ASSISTANCE

7 PROGRAM.—Section 417(d) of the Energy Conservation 

8 and Production Act (42 U.S.C. 6867(d)) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘(d) Payments’’ and inserting 

10 the following: 

11 ‘‘(d) METHOD AND TIMING OF PAYMENTS.— 

12 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), 

13 any payments’’; and 

14 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(2) TIMING.—Notwithstanding any other pro16 vision of law (including regulations), not later than 

17 60 days after the date on which funds have been 

18 made available to provide assistance under this part, 

19 the Secretary shall distribute to the applicable re20 cipient the full amount of assistance to be provided 

21 to the recipient under this part for the fiscal year.’’. 

22 (b) TIMING FOR DISTRIBUTION OF FINANCIAL AS23 SISTANCE UNDER THE STATE ENERGY PROGRAM.—Sec24 tion 363 of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 

25 U.S.C. 6323) is amended by adding at the end the fol26 lowing: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 185 IS

1 ‘‘(g) TIMING FOR DISTRIBUTION OF FINANCIAL AS2 SISTANCE.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law 

3 (including regulations), not later than 60 days after the 

4 date on which funds have been made available to provide 

5 financial assistance under this section, the Secretary shall 

6 distribute to the applicable State the full amount of assist7 ance to be provided to the State under this section for 

8 the fiscal year.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### People of the State of Illinois ex rel. Chas. E. Reeve v. James H. Gilbert, Sheriff.

1. Habeas Corpus—Appeal.—An appeal or writ of error does not lie to review an order on habeas corpus.

Memorandum.—Habeas corpus. Appeal from the Superior Court: the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding. Submitted at the October term, 1894, and dismissed.

Opinion filed February 12, 1895.

A. P. Ingram and A. J. Bedard, attorneys for appellant.

P. T. Keily, attorney for appellee.

Mr. Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal from an order made on habeas corpus, refusing to discharge the relator from the custody of the sheriff, holding him under a *cap. ad res.*

For two reasons—either sufficient—the appeal is dismissed.

First. As the relator has appealed from the final judgment in the case in which the process issued, and given good *506security to pay that judgment (Reeve v. Peppard, 57 Ill. App. 556), there is no probability that he remains in custody, and we won’t hold a moot court. Aff v. Hopkins, 57 Ill. App. 529.

Second. An appeal or writ of error does not lie to review an order on habeas corpus. Napier v. People, 9 Ill. App. 523.

Appeal dismissed
f;-& 

' * IJ SDC SDW. ! t 

t DOCUR.iE?X i 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 E[EC!'RC::ICi3A'Y T1B.D li 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YoRK I r nm +: I: 

i. -- I i 

---------------------------------- c- 

- X : ,..._..&.---,.,. ___"_., I.d.C_.*.-+.-~-d*-l_ 

IN RE: FOSADLqX PRODUCTS LIABILmTTY : 

LITIGATION 

MDL NO. 17E9 

1 : 06-md- 1789 (JFKj 

X 

This Document Relates to: ORDER 

All actlons 

- X 

JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District Judge: 

Oral argument on Plaintiffs' notior: to compel 

production ~f documents will tdke plat-e at 1O:OG a.m. on 

June 2, 2008 in Court.room 20-C. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: New York, New York 

May 21, 2008 

x, 1 JOHN F. KEENAN \ 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 30 Filed 05/21/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### UTILITIES COMM. v. COACH CO.

No. 101 PC.

Case below: 19 N.C. App. 597.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 9 January 1974.
Case 7:07-cv-03381-GAY     Document 4      Filed 06/20/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 7:07-cv-03381-GAY     Document 4      Filed 06/20/2007     Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. LANCASTER and FLACK

No. 49 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 528.

Petition by defendant Flack for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 1978.
Case 1:06-cv-15045-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03376-RLE Document 14-2 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03376-RLE Document 14-2 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03376-RLE Document 14-2 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03376-RLE Document 14-2 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03376-RLE Document 14-2 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 5 of 5
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1818 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1818

   To require the Secretary of Transportation to publish a notice of 
  proposed rulemaking concerning seat belts on school buses, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 12, 2019

  Mr. Menendez (for himself and Mr. Booker) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of Transportation to publish a notice of 
  proposed rulemaking concerning seat belts on school buses, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Secure Every Child Under the Right 
Equipment Standards Act of 2019'' or the ``SECURES Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. PROPOSED RULEMAKING.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall publish a 
notice of proposed rulemaking on new Federal standards for school bus 
seat belt requirements on all school buses, regardless of gross vehicle 
weight rating.
    (b) Considerations.--In the proposed rulemaking under subsection 
(a), the Secretary of Transportation shall consider--
            (1) the safety benefits of lap/shoulder belt system (also 
        known as a ``Type 2 seat belt assembly'');
            (2) the conclusions of the National Transportation Safety 
        Board that--
                    (A) ``lap/shoulder belts provide the highest level 
                of protection for school bus passengers''; and
                    (B) ``properly worn lap belts provide some 
                benefit'' while ``properly worn lap/shoulder belts 
                provide greater benefit by reducing injuries related to 
                upper body flailing'';
            (3) the 2015 announcement by the Administrator of the 
        National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Mark Rosekind, 
        stating that the agency believes that ``every child on every 
        school bus should have a three-point seat belt'';
            (4) any innovative approaches to seat belt detection, seat 
        belt reminder systems, and seat belt violation alert systems 
        that could be incorporated into school bus designs; and
            (5) existing experience from States that have already 
        required school buses to be equipped with seat belts.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 25-6 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### MILLING Co. v. HETTIGER

No. 103 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 76.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 January 1976.
#### STATE v. SEAY

No. 22P83.

Case below: 59 N.C. App. 667.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 March 1983. Motion for Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 8 March 1983.
Case 1:07-cv-03377-CM Document 8 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cv-03377-CM Document 8 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cv-03377-CM Document 8 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cv-03377-CM Document 8 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cv-03377-CM Document 8 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 5 of 5
#### NOLAN v. BOULWARE

No. 111 PC.

Case below: 21 N.C. App. 347.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 July 1974.