alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FIRST NATIONAL BANCSHARES INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERNCE TO SUCH REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM SB-2 ORIGINALLY
FILED ON SEPTEMBER 21, 1999, FILE NO. 333-87503.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001095274
<NAME>                        First National Bancshares, Inc.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-14-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         126,121
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         11,197,367
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           11,172,547
<LOANS>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,468,458
<DEPOSITS>                                     0
<SHORT-TERM>                                   390,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            11,291,304
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       100
<OTHER-SE>                                     (212,946)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 11,468,458
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              33,077
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               33,077
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,866
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          25,211
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                238,157
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (212,946)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     (212,946)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (212,946)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.18)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 0
<LOANS-NON>                                    0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  0
<RECOVERIES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

HANNA A. LAYTON

, 1

Respondent Below,

Appellant,

v.

JACKSON P. LAYTON

,

Petitioner Below,

Appellee. §

§ No. 378, 2018

§

§ Court Below

— Family Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ C.A. No. C N 1 1

- 03412

§ Petition No. 18

- 02352

§

§

§

Submitted: December 28, 2018

Decided: February 27 , 2019

Before STRINE

, Chief Justice ; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR , Justices.

O RDER

After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on

appeal, we conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis

of the Family Court’s well

- reasoned order dated June 25, 2018. The

appellant’s arguments regarding the rescission of the maternal grandmother’s

guardianship, the award of sole custody to t he appellee, and subsequent events

are outside the scope of this appeal. 2

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d)

. 2 The rescission of the guardianship and award of sole custody are the subject of another

appeal, Layton v. Layton , No. 377, 2018.2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the

Family Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/ s / Karen L. Valihura

Justice
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Northern Border Pipeline
Company (the "Partnership") for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
William R. Cordes, as President of Northern Plains Natural Gas Company, Operator
(functional equivalent to the Partnership's principal executive officer), hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
            1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.

Dated:  March 6, 2006               /s/ William R. Cordes
                                    ----------------------------------
                                    William R. Cordes
                                    President, Northern Plains Natural
                                    Gas Company

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and
not for any other purpose.
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 2-5 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 2-5 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### MANESS v. BULLINS

No. 109 PC.

Case below: 11 N.C. App. 567.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 September 1971.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Global Precision Medical Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lindsay Semple, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|By: | /s/ Lindsay Semple                                      
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------
|    | Lindsay Semple
Chief Executive Officer
September 2, 2003
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of K-tel International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kimmy Lockwood, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                     Thereport fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
| By       |     | /s/ KIMMY LOCKWOOD            |   |   |
|----------|----------|-------------------------------|--------|--------|
|     |     | Kimmy Lockwood                |   |   |
| * * | * * | *Principal Financial Officer* |   |   |
|     |     | November 22, 2006             |   |   |

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-03239-RPP     Document 21      Filed 07/07/2008     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03239-RPP     Document 21      Filed 07/07/2008     Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31(b)
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
I, Mark J. Plush, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Keithley Instruments, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, andreport financial information; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: May 10, 2005 /s/ Mark J. Plush   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Soldier Accounted For From Korean War (Hash, B.J)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
form10kexh1022_082409.htm






EXHIBIT 10.22


 

 

Narrative Summary of American Consumers, Inc.

Executive Officer Cash Bonus Plan for Fiscal 2010





The following is a description of the Cash Bonus Plan applicable to the fiscal year ending in May 2010 for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of American Consumers, Inc. (the “Company”), the only executive officer of the Company who qualifies as a “named executive officer” pursuant to Item 402(m)(2) of Securities
and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K.  The Board of Directors of the Company, acting upon the recommendations of management and the Board’s Compensation Committee, has elected to leave this potential bonus percentage unchanged from the potential bonus percentage established for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for the Company’s 2009 fiscal year.





During fiscal 2010, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will be eligible to receive a discretionary cash bonus equal to the fixed percentage of the Company’s net income before taxes for such year set forth below for such officer:

 

 



	
Name:

 
	
Title:
	
Potential Bonus as a

Percentage of Pre-Tax Income:

	
Michael A. Richardson
	
Chairman of the Board, President

and Chief Executive Officer
	
6%









 

 





The amount of any bonus ultimately paid will be determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee.  In the usual case, if the Company is profitable bonuses will be paid at the targeted levels.  As reported in the Company’s proxy statement for its 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, such officer was paid
a bonus in the amount of $4,474 with respect the Company’s performance in fiscal 2009.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ALEXANDER BIVINS.

(Filed 20 May 1964.)

Obscenity—

The fact that a Venetian blind lacks some six to ten inches of reaching the window sill is entirely irrelevant in a prosecution of defendant for peeping into a room occupied by a female. G.S. 14-202.

Appeal by defendant from *Martin, S. J.,*October 14, 1963 Session of CumberlaND.

Defendant was charged with secretly peeping into a room occupied by a female, a misdemeanor, G.S. 14-202. The jury returned a verdict of guilty. A prison sentence of twelve months was imposed. Defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Sanders for the State.*

*Arthur L. Lane and Earl Whitted, Jr., for defendant.*

PeR Curiam.

Defendant has expressly abandoned all of his assignments of error except those based on his motion for nonsuit.

The evidence for the State is sufficient for the jury to find these facts: Defendant had on July 16, 1963 partaken of alcoholic beverages. Between 8:30 and 9:00 p.m. he parked his car across the street from the home of Othol Jackson. He got out of the car, crossed the street, and went to a window in the bedroom of the Jackson home. The room was *94occupied by Jackson and his wife. She was on the bed adjacent to the window. There was a wire screen in the window and on the inside of the window was a Venetian blind. The slats in the blind were drawn shut, but the bottom of the blind lacked six to ten inches of reaching the window sill. Defendant’s presence was discovered by the odor of alcohol which pervaded the bedroom. He was’seen with his face pressed against the wire screen peering into the room.

Defendant contends that looking into the room when the blind was not tightly pressed against' the window sill is not a “peeping” within the meaning of the statute. The word “peep” means to look cautiously or slyly — as if through a crevice- — -out from chinks and knotholes (Webster’s Third International Dictionary). The conduct described constitutes a peeping, hence the court properly overruled the motion for non-suit.

Affirmed.
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 30 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 30 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 30 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 9-10 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 9-10 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Microbiology, Infectious diseases and AIDS Initial Review Group, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research Committee.                    

*Date:*                         February 23-25, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Annie Walker-Abbey, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, RM. 3266, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-2671,                         *aabbey@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 1, 2005.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-2338 Filed 2-7-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**EXHIBIT32**

 

            Harry Lee WaterfieldII and Raymond L. Carr, being the President and Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer, respectively, of Investors Heritage Capital Corporation, hereby certify as of this____thday of December, 2009, that the Form 10-Q/A for the Quarter ended June 30, 2009fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q/Afairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Investors Heritage Capital Corporation.

 

 

|   | **INVESTORS			HERITAGE CAPITAL CORPORATION** 
  
BY:  /s/Harry			Lee Waterfield II 
Harry Lee			Waterfield II
DATE:			December ___, 2009
President 
  
			BY:  /s/Raymond L. Carr 
Raymond L.			Carr
DATE: December			___, 2009
Vice President			- Chief Financial Officer
  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### FOUST v. HUGHES

No. 94 PC.

Case below: 21 N.C. App. 268.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 June 1974.
Case 1:06-cv-15053-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03473-GEL Document 10-6 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03473-GEL Document 10-6 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03468-SCR     Document 4      Filed 06/12/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF     Document 52      Filed 07/10/2008     Page 1 of 1
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 13 Filed 08/01/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 13 Filed 08/01/2007 Page 2 of 2