alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      UT
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000


<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      532,664
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     26,320
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         160,026
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       146,097
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 865,107
<COMMON>                                        20,744
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       61,814
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            216,187
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 298,668
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,763
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           204,365
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  93,100
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                          150
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 267,061
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  865,107
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      389,768
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            18,119
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     331,299
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     349,418
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         40,350
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 741
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  41,091
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        12,056
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,035
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         48
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   28,987
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        12,648
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        7,569
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          25,761
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.54

<FN>
Capital-surplus-paid-in is net of $24,017 of treasury stock.







                                 Page 28


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. SIMON

No. 162 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 71.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 25 August 1975.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL BROWN, a/k/a Michael A. Brown, a/k/a Michael Andrew 

Brown, a/k/a Karim Clark, a/k/a Karin Clark, a/k/a Jakari Wallace,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D17-3771 & 4D17-3772

[July 26, 2018]

Consolidated appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial 

Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, Judge; L.T. Case No. 01-

18623-CF-10A.

Michael Brown, Arcadia, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard 

Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**CERTIFICATIONS **Exhibit 31(i).1
   
I, Harry Lee Waterfield II, certify that:
  
1.
I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kentucky Investors, Inc.;
  
2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
  
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
  
4.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and we have:
   
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared,
   
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation, and
   
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
  
5.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:
   
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
   
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
  

Date: May 13, 2005
By: /s/ 
Harry Lee Waterfield II 
President
** 

 ******
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION





In connection with the quarterly report of Berry Plastics Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James M. Kratochvil, the Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
and Secretary of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 and is not being filed as part of the Report.








/s/ James M. Kratochvil


James M. Kratochvil


Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial


Officer, Treasurer and Secretary





Date:           August 10, 2009
ROBERT CARTER

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 2694

__________ ___________________/

Opinion filed August 14, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Michael C. Overstreet , Judge

.

Robert Carter, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AF FIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          20,417
<SECURITIES>                                     5,965
<RECEIVABLES>                                  194,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               232,642
<PP&E>                                          50,293
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,876
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 344,222
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,928
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,952    
<OTHER-SE>                                     270,010
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   344,222
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               214,962
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  180,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   129
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  49
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,972
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,046
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,926
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 3 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 4 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 5 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 6 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 7 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 8 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 9 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 10 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 11 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 12 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 13 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 14 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 15 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 16 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 17 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 18 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 19 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 20 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 21 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 22 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 23 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 24 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03472-SAS Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 25 of 25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT . I---- 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ~.. 

__C__-- 

...................................................... X 

1N RE: Fosamax Products Liability 

Litigation 1:06-rnd-1789 (JFK) 

...................................................... x ORDER FOR ADMISSION 

This Document Relates to: MDL-1789 : PRO HAC VICE 

Fredericku Allen v. Merck Cose Nu .l)6-cv-9452 

BricI,wr Arcernon1 v Merck (.>o.$e lli~.. 07-1.1.-3389 : 

I.i~,~iliill Bergesiin 1,. .Mr,!ck ('usc, Gi. , 06-~,-Y454 

.Shirio HO/L.I I ,Me~.ik i o.w i\r, 116-~~~94jj 

.\'hrri.i,ii Brotllorli I. .Me~.ck ( osr .'o O--LL-~T? 

1 I I. I! . .\/erck Citse Xu.. 107-cv- 14 13 : 

Rciher~o Brudin v. ,.M~rck C'use No : 07-cv-3466 

Ure~ldu Curpenrer 1,. Merck Cose Nu.: 07-cr-346-1 

Sonjd Doroff v. MrrcL Cose Ko.: 07-cv-3162 

Debro Flc~res r. Mgrck Case No.: 07-c1,-0211? 

Yo~idrii Huii 1,. Mrrck CIS@ No.: 07-~~3167 

Po~r.~o Hor4 v. .Merck C'use No.: 07-cv-797 

C'oru(vn Hester L.. hJer~.k Case ,No.:06-cr-9450 

f'anieiu Hir~es v. Merck Cose No.: O:-~v-180 

l(ocheiic Keni~ r,. Merck ibse No.: 07-~1'-00478 

Anriu A/eril'i~i Y. .L(t.rck Case No 0'-cv-3163 

.iu~lrcc, :Woe i Merck (as2 Yo.. 0'-ci:-00479 

, \I 1 ;b/erik Cu,\e (Vu 06-c,.-Yf j i 

I ii 1 Lferck i 'iis? 30 . 07-r1~-3465 

Tonilit, l'orle~. v. .Llrri.k Cuse n'u. 07-0-790 

..Murgurer Sizelure 1'. .b/t,r~,k Case ,Yo.: 07-cv-3459 : 

~\.fu.ritie Skilrrs 1, Merck Cose No.. 07-cv-3-16 i 

Edno Sykes v. Merck Cose No. :U7-cv-i1!2 

Kafhler.rr Tuelke v. Merck Cose No.. U6-~.v-7629 

Rgna Vun~le~.cur v. Meri.L Case No.06-cv-i 1329 : 

"V?~i!ie Wade r hlerck Cuse No.:06-cv-9453 

Carol Young I:. Merrk Case No. Ub-c1.-0531 

Bonnie L~~rglrlirr v. MrrcA Case No.:07-m-1827 

___________________-----------------------------------. 

Ccinsidering the Certilicate of Good Standing submitted by counsel, 1T IS 

HEREBY OROEKED that: 

Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 3 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 1 of 3
Meghnn M. Tans 

1.e~ in. Papantonio. Thomas. Mitchell. Echsner & Proctor. P.A. 

316 S. Baylen Street. Suite 400 

P.O. Hi>s 11308 (31591 ) 

Penjacol;i. FL 32502 

Phone: (850) 435-71 81 

Facsimile: (850) 436-6181 

Email: mtans~levinlaw.com 

is admitted to practice pro hac vice as counsel for the plaintiffs in the above-referenced 

MDL proceedlne 

Signed this day of 

Yorl. % . 2007. at w*. New 

Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 3 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 2 of 3
\(I :.:(I i<~. ','I<, l r8~~1cn~c 1 ll)~>d ~IJIIJIIIL. 

STATES DISTRICT COURT 

RIIDD12E DISTRICT OF FI>ORID.A 

CERTIFIC.4TE OF GOOD STANDING 

I. Siio:~ I I.. i.oesi.ii , ('1ei.k ($iiiis C'oiiri, 

i.wli/i . . rhii/ ;Ll~,,yliir~r ;2% T(iirs, Btii- Y 0088874.i. 

11 (1.y drili~ ~iiliiriii~~ii 10 /mr[,iic~, 111iiii.~ C01ii.1 oii 

.A/>ril 32, 200.5. ciiiil is iii good siciiitlii~g 

trs tr nrei~ihcr of [lie 8~11 ofilris C'oiii.~. 

Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 3 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Enstar Group, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



/s/ Cheryl D. Davis
----------------------------------------------------
Cheryl D. Davis
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Corporate
Taxes, and Secretary
August 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Enstar Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Enstar Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT 8

                            Prinicipal Subsidiaries

         As of December 31, 2001, we had direct or indirect interests in the
following principal subsidiaries. All of these entities are private limited
companies and were owned by CNOOC upon their incorporation/establishment
except for CNOOC International Limited which was owned by us upon its
incorporation:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                 Percentage of
                         Place and date of      equity interest
                          incorporation/         attributable       Issued and
   Name of entity          establishment             to us        paid up capital       Principal activities
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                     <C>                     <C>               <C>                   <C>

Directly held subsidiaries:

CNOOC China Limited   Tianjin, the PRC       100%               RMB10 billion      Offshore petroleum
                         September 15, 1999                                           exploration, development,
                                                                                      production and sales in
                                                                                      the PRC

CNOOC International   British Virgin Islands 100%               US$2               Investment holding
   Limited               August 23, 1999

China Offshore Oil    Singapore              100%               S$3 million        Sales and marketing of
   (Singapore)           May 14, 1993                                                 petroleum outside of the
   International                                                                      PRC
   Pte. Ltd.


Indirectly held subsidiaries*:

Malacca Petroleum     Bermuda                100%               US$12,000          Investment holding
Limited                  November 2, 1995

OOGC America, Inc.    State of Delaware,     100%               US$1,000           Investment holding
                         United States of
                         America
                         September 2, 1997

OOGC Malacca Limited  Bermuda                100%               US$12,000          Investment holding
                         November 2, 1995

CNOOC Southeast Asia  Bermuda                100%               US$12,000          Investment holding
   Limited**             May 16, 1997

*        Indirectly held through CNOOC International Limited.
**       Formerly known as OOGC Myanmar Limited
</TABLE>
#### KING v. LEE

No. 30 PC.

Case below: 9 N.C. App. 369.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 3 November 1970.
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 3 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 4 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 5 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 6 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 7 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 8 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 9 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 10 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 11 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 12 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 13 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 14 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 15 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 16 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 17 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 18 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 19 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 20 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 21 of 21
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 8 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 8 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 10 Filed 01/25/2008 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 10 Filed 01/25/2008 Page 2 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 10 Filed 01/25/2008 Page 3 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 10 Filed 01/25/2008 Page 4 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 10 Filed 01/25/2008 Page 5 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 10 Filed 01/25/2008 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 10 Filed 01/25/2008 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 10 Filed 01/25/2008 Page 8 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 10 Filed 01/25/2008 Page 9 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 10 Filed 01/25/2008 Page 10 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 10 Filed 01/25/2008 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 10 Filed 01/25/2008 Page 12 of 12
Case 1:06-cv-14850-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### WILLIAMS v. TRUST CO.

No. 228 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 18.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 1 September 1976.
#### NYE v. LIPTON

No. 20PC

Case below: 50 NC App 224

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 May 1981.
#### GILLESPIE v. DEWITT

No. 13 PC.

Case below: 53 N.C. App. 252.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 November 1981.
*Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 19, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41281 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAIME GARCIA-SANCHEZ, true name Gumaro Hernandez-Mar Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas

(5:04-CR-767) Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jaime Garcia-Sanchez appeals his 30-month sentence for being

an alien who was unlawfully found in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). Garcia challenges that constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be alleged in the indictment and found by a jury, in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Garcia’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 2352

(1998). Although Garcia contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule it in light of Apprendi , we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2000). Garcia properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed, but he raises it here to preserve for further review. Accordingly, Garcia’s conviction is affirmed. Garcia also contends that his sentence must be vacated and his

case remanded for resentencing because the district court erred by sentencing him under a mandatory Sentencing Guidelines regime, in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U. S. 220 (2005). Garcia preserved this contention at the district court; thus, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the district court would have imposed the same sentence had the Guidelines been advisory. See United States v. Walters, 418 F.3d 461, 463-64 (5th Cir. 2005). Here, the sentencing transcript is silent with regard to whether the district court would have imposed the same sentence had the Guidelines been advisory. As such, the government cannot show that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Accordingly, we REMAND to the district court to allow the district court to resentence Garcia-Sanchez if, in its discretion under the now-advisory Guidelines, it chooses to do so.3

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING .