alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. DAIS

No. 19 PC.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 379.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 30 August 1974. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 30 August 1974.
VANGUARD HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.



EXHIBIT 10.63





AMENDMENT NO. 4

TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


            This Amendment No. 4 (this “Amendment’) dated as of May 5, 2009, is made by and between Vanguard Health Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Ronald P.
Soltman (the “Executive”).


            WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive executed a certain Amended and Restated Employment  Agreement  dated as of September 23, 2004, as further amended  (collectively, the
“EA”),  to secure the services of the Executive as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary; and


            WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish the Executive’s base salary set forth in Section 6(a) of the EA to be increased to $549,040, effective as of April 1, 2009.


            NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, the Company and the Executive hereby agree that the EA is amended as follows:


            1.         Defined Terms.  Except for those terms defined above, the definitions of capitalized terms used in this Amendment are as provided in
the EA.


            2.         Amendment to Section 6(a).  Section 6(a) of the EA entitled “Base Salary” is hereby  deleted and replaced with
the following new Section 6(a):





                        “(a) Base Salary.  Effective April 1, 2009, the Executive’s base salary hereunder shall

                        be $549,040 per year, payable semi-monthly. Commencing July 1, 2010, the Board

                        shall review such base salary at least annually and make such adjustments from time

                        to time as it may deem advisable, but the base salary shall not at any time be reduced

                        from the base salary in effect from time to time.”


            3.         Ratification.  All other provisions of the EA remain unchanged and are hereby  ratified by the Company and the Executive.


1











            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by  ts duly authorized officer and the Executive has executed this Amendment, each as of the day and year first
set forth above.



                                                                       
Vanguard Health Systems, Inc.



                                                                       
By:/s/ Phillip W.
Roe                                        


                                                                                   
Phillip W. Roe

                                                                                   
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial

                                                                                   
Officer and Treasurer



                                                                       
Executive:






                                                                       
/s/ Ronald P. Soltman                                      


                                                                       
Ronald P. Soltman


2
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

EARL SHEPHERD and SANDRA SHEPHERD
, Appellant s ,

v.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as trustee for Structured Asset Investment Loan Trust Mortgage Pass

- Through Certificates

Series 2005

- 4

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 876

[ April 22, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Elizabeth Ann Metzger , Judge; L.T. Case No.

2018CA000942

.

Jeff Barnes of W.J. Barnes, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellants.

Kimberly S. Mello and Arda Goker of Greenberg, Traurig, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER
, D AMOORGIAN and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of Kreisler Manufacturing Corporation (the Company) does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 14, 2005 |  | /s/ Michael D. Stern   
|                        |  | Michael D. Stern       
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                        | 
|Date: November 14, 2005 |  | /s/ Edward A. Stern    
|                        |  | Edward A. Stern        
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
ex4_1.htm






Exhibit 4.1



 

 

Sparking Events, Inc. INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA CERTIFICATE NUMBER SHARES PAR VALUE $0.001 COMMON STOCK THIS CERTIFIES THAT IS THE OWNER OF FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK PAR VALE
OF $0.001 EACH OF SPARKING EVENTS, INC. TRANSFERABLE ON THE BOOKS OF THE CORPORATION IN PERSON OR BY DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY UPON SURRENDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE PROPERLY ENDORSED. THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT VALID UNTIL COUNTERSIGNED BY THE TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTERED BY THE REGISTRAR. WITNESS THE FACSIMILE SEAL ON THE CORPORATION AND THE FACSIMILE SIGNATURES OF ITS DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS. CARLO GIUSTO PRESIDENT ADAM GODOY BORGES DOS SANTOS Director DATED: COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED ISLAND STOCK TRANSFER Transfer
Agent Authorized signature 100 Second Avenue South, Site 705S, St. Petersburg, FL, 33701 727.289.0010 SPARKING EVENTS, INC. CORPORATE SEAL NEVADA SPECIMEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

-% 

In re Fosamax Froducts Liability : 

Lit lgdt ion 

- - - - - - - - . .. - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X 

This Gocutnent Re2ates to: 

All Actions. ----.----------------------------- -X 

JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District 3udge: 

After considering the letters subinltted 

the !:our-t w:ll r,ot enter M~rck's propc~ed order regarding rases 

filed by BeatFe and Osbdrrt, LLP that involve less t!~an three 

zcntinuous years of Fosamax use. Whether fir not Fcsa~nax call cause 

ONJ in anyone before three years of use remains an open quest-ion 

that should be resolved uniformly on the basla of the scientific 

evidence generated a£ ter a f gll opporturli tls for dir;covery. 

Thc parties are directed tc7 agree upsn and submit to the 

Court by October 7, 20ila a case managemuilt order Froposlng: (1) a 

sckdule to con~plete all generic expert discovery In this MDL; and 

(2) a schedule for summary judqn-tent mot-ions. In the event that the 

parties cannot reach agreement, by the same date each shall submit 

~ts own PI-oposal dlcng with a letter brief In support of it, and 

appear for a conference in ~ourtrooni 20C on Octobei- 16, 2005 at 

1G:30 am. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: New York, New York 

September 9, 2008 

I 

1 

JOHN F. KEENAN 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 37 Filed 09/09/2008 Page 1 of 1
UL Research Institutes

6200 Old Dobbin Lane, Suite 150

Columbia, MD 21045

T +1.847.664.6999

UL.org © 2022 Underwriters Laboratories Inc.

November 9, 2022

CDR Kenny Fent, PhD, CIH

National Firefighter Registry

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Dear Kenny, 

On behalf of the Fire Safety Research Institute at UL Research Institutes I would like to provide our full support for 

the National Firefighter Registry. Through our research and partnership with NIOSH through the years we know 

we share the goals of protecting the fire service from developing cancer, lessening the impact of cancer, 

developing new health and safety measures to keep future firefighters safe and improving the understanding of 

cancer risk among all groups within the fire service. We will dedicate resources to support recruitment for 

firefighters to join the NFR and support other tactics that will enable this tool to fulfill its critical mission. Please do 

not hesitate to reach out for any additional support you need.

Sincerely,

Steve Kerber

Vice President & Executive Director

Fire Safety Research Institute
Case 1:06-cv-14858-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------------- X

JOSEPH STEVENS & COMPANY, INC.

Petitioner,

-againstDAVID CIKANEK,

Respondent.

---------------------------------------------------------------- X

No. 07 CV 3385

Honorable Barbara Jones

DECLARATION OF RENAN SUGARMAN

IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER

I, RENAN I. SUGARMAN, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and

correct:

1. I am an attorney admitted to practice before the courts of the states of New York and

Illinois. I represented David Cikanek in the underlying arbitration proceeding, David Cikanek v.

Joseph Stevens & Co., Inc., Kevin Brody, Leonard Inserra and Ross Inserra, NASD Case

No. 06-01868 (the “Arbitration”), in which the award Petitioner Joseph Stevens & Company,

Inc. (“Joseph Stevens”) now seeks to vacate was rendered.

2. I submit this declaration in support of David Cikanek’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of

personal jurisdiction or alternatively to transfer the proceeding to the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Illinois.

3. Although requested by both Mr. Cikanek and the Arbitration panel, at no time did Joseph

Stevens ever produce, furnish or provide a copy of any new account agreement(s) executed or

signed by Mr. Cikanek.

4. There is nothing in the record of the Arbitration which supports or evidences that any

new account agreement Mr. Cikanek signed contained the provisions quoted in paragraphs 6 and

7 of Joseph Steven’s Application.

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 15 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

5. Under the arrangement between my office and Mr. Cikanek, he is responsible for all

costs and expenses incurred in connection with opposing Joseph Steven’s Application to Vacate.

6. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1746, I declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and

correct.

Executed this 14th day of June, 2007

_____/S/RENAN I SUGARMAN

RENAN I SUGARMAN 

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 15 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-3 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-3 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-3 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-3 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-3 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-3 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-3 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-3 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-3 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-3 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-3 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 11 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 10-6 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:05-cr-00369-VM Document 72 Filed 05/21/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:05-cr-00369-VM Document 72 Filed 05/21/2008 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PrimeEnergy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles E. Drimal Jr., Chief Executive Officer of PrimeEnergy Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Charles E. Drimal, Jr.                    
|Charles E. Drimal, Jr. Chief
Executive Officer
|May 17, 2010
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Northern Border Pipeline
Company (the "Partnership") for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Jerry
L. Peters, Vice President, Finance and Treasurer, of Northern Plains Natural Gas
Company, Operator (functional equilavent to the Partnership's principal
financial and accounting officer), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
            1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.

Dated:  March 6, 2006              /s/ Jerry L. Peters
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                       Jerry L. Peters
                                       Vice President, Finance and Treasurer
                                       Northern Plains Natural Gas Company

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and
not for any other purpose.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   8-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-29-1998             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,770,538                 661,502
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,472,662               7,663,316
<ALLOWANCES>                                   228,644                 303,644
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,321,330              10,972,642
<PP&E>                                         948,832               2,280,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                 168,756                 634,476
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,069,002              41,477,937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,971,720              15,738,518
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        97,292                 110,579
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,062,490              25,628,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,069,002              41,477,937
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,626,003              26,910,653
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,490,050               7,617,578
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                 295,450
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,036,457)             (7,963,169)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,735                 645,766
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,371,188)             (8,608,935)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,371,188)             (8,608,935)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.41)                  (1.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.41)                  (1.01)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

------------------------------X

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

NOTICE OF MOTION

- V - :

07 Cr. 366 (JSR)

ROBERTO ORTIZ :

Defendant. :

------------------------------X

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the annexed affirmation of

ROBERT M. BAUM, ESQ., the defendant herein, ROBERTO ORTIZ, will

move before the HONORABLE JED S. RAKOFF, United States District

Judge for the Southern District of New York, at the United States

Courthouse located at 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York, on

June 13, 2007, for an Order, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3)(C) of the

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the Fourth and Fifth

Amendments to the United States Constitution, suppressing

physical evidence and statements and granting such other relief

as the Court may deem just and proper. 

Dated: New York, New York

June 11, 2007

Respectfully submitted,

LEONARD F. JOY, ESQ.

Federal Defenders of New York

By: ____________________________

ROBERT M. BAUM, ESQ.

Attorney for Defendant

ROBERTO ORTIZ

52 Duane Street - 10 Floor th

New York, New York 10007

TO: MICHAEL J. GARCIA, ESQ.

United States Attorney

Southern District of New York

One St. Andrew’s Plaza

Case 1:07-cr-00366-JSR Document 6 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
New York, New York 10007

Attn: MARSHALL A. CAMP, ESQ.

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 1:07-cr-00366-JSR Document 6 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF     Document 38      Filed 05/05/2008     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 78 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 1 of 1
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5366 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To require the proposal for debarment from contracting with 

the Federal Government of persons violating the Foreign 

Corrupt Practices Act of 1977. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sroberts on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5366 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Overseas Contractor 

3 Reform Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO PROPOSE FOR DEBARMENT PER5 SONS VIOLATING THE FOREIGN CORRUPT 

6 PRACTICES ACT. 

7 (a) REQUIREMENT TO PROPOSE FOR DEBARMENT.— 

8 Unless waived by the head of a Federal agency under sub9 section (b), any person found to be in violation of the For10 eign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 shall be proposed for 

11 debarment from any contract or grant awarded by the 

12 Federal Government within 30 days after a final judgment 

13 of such violation. 

14 (b) WAIVER.—The head of a Federal agency may 

15 waive this section for a Federal contract or grant. Any 

16 such waiver shall be reported to Congress by the head of 

17 the agency concerned within 30 days from the date of the 

18 waiver, along with an accompanying justification. 

19 (c) FINAL JUDGMENT.—For purposes of this section, 

20 a judgment becomes final when all appeals of the judg21 ment have been finally determined, or all time for filing 

22 such appeals has expired. 

23 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

24 (1) CONTRACT.—The term ‘‘contract’’ means a 

25 binding agreement entered into by a Federal agency 

26 for the purpose of obtaining property or services. 


sroberts on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5366 RFS

1 (2) PERSON.—The term ‘‘person’’ includes— 

2 (A) an individual; 

3 (B) a partnership; and 

4 (C) a corporation. 

5 (3) FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT OF

6 1977.—The term ‘‘Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 

7 1977’’ means— 

8 (A) section 30A of the Securities Exchange 

9 Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78dd–1); and 

10 (B) sections 104 and 104A of the Foreign 

11 Corrupt Practices Act (15 U.S.C. 78dd–2). 

12 SEC. 3. GOVERNMENTAL POLICY. 

13 It is the policy of the United States Government that 

14 no Government contracts or grants should be awarded to 

15 individuals or companies who violate the Foreign Corrupt 

16 Practices Act of 1977. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 15, 

2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


sroberts on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 25, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 25, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16I0200. STRAVIOUS JOHNSON v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

ST15CR2090