alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

KINDER MORGAN, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Kinder Morgan, Inc. and will be retained by Kinder Morgan, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





|                           |  |                                                              
|-------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  November
		8, 2006 |  | /s/ Kimberly A. Dang                                         
|                           |  | Kimberly A. Dang
		Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In connection with the annual report of CDKNet.Com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending May 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 17, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Oleg
Logvinov, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/ Oleg Logvinov
--------------------------
Oleg Logvinov
Chief Executive Officer
September 17, 2004


A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          23,432
<SECURITIES>                                    11,331
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,486
<PP&E>                                          29,245
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,363
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 198,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,882
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,746 
<OTHER-SE>                                     162,780 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   198,191
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               394,961
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  361,196
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   175
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,814
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,561
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,253
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30 
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 223 (Monday, November 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 70061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22993]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 111405A]


U.S. Climate Change Science Program Synthesis and Assessment 
Product 1.1

AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of availability and request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration publish 
this notice to announce the availability of the U.S. Climate Change 
Science Program (CCSP) Synthesis and Assessment draft Product 1.1 
addressing the CCSP Topic: ``Temperature trends in the lower 
atmosphere-steps for understanding and reconciling differences'' for 
public comment. Following the public comment period, the lead authors 
will revise the Product, taking into consideration the submitted 
comments. The lead agency will then submit the revised Synthesis and 
Assessment Product to the CCSP Interagency Committee for approval and 
eventual release in accordance with the procedure described in the 
approved Prospectus for Synthesis and Assessment Product 1.1 that is 
posted on the CCSP Program Office web site: www.climatescience.gov.

DATES: Comments must be received by January 5, 2006.

ADDRESSES: The Synthesis and Assessment draft Product and detailed 
instructions for making comments on the draft Product are posted, along 
with the Prospectus, on the CCSP Program Office web site at 
www.climatescience.gov. Please make certain that submitted comments are 
prepared in accordance with these instructions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard H. Moss, Ph.D., Director, 
Climate Change Science Program Office, 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 
Suite 250, Washington, DC 20006, Telephone: (202) 419-3476.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CCSP was established by the President in 
2002 to coordinate and integrate scientific research on global and 
climate changes sponsored by 13 participating departments and agencies 
of the U.S. Government. The CCSP is charged with preparing information 
resources that support climate-related discussions and decisions, 
including scientific synthesis and assessment analyses that support 
evaluation of important policy issues. The Synthesis and Assessment 
draft Product addressing the CCSP Topic: ``Temperature trends in the 
lower atmosphere-steps for understanding and reconciling differences'' 
is one of 21 such products that will be produced by the CCSP.

    Dated: November 15, 2005.
James R. Mahoney,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, Director, 
Climate Change Science Program.
[FR Doc. 05-22993 Filed 11-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-KB-S
#### STATE v. WRAY

No. 124 PC.

Case below: 35 N.C. App. 682.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 June 1978. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 6 June 1978.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.2

                            RESOLUTIONS TO AMEND
                 RETIREMENT PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

         RESOLVED, That the first sentence of Section 2 of the Terms of
Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Laclede Gas Company is amended
effective October 1, 2004 by replacing the phrase "at the time of retirement
(or death in the case referred to in subclause (c)(ii) of the first sentence
of Paragraph 1 above" with "on November 1, 2002" so the first sentence shall
read as follows:

                  Benefits shall, following the Entitlement Date (as
         hereinafter defined), be payable to each Eligible Director
         annually, and each annual payment shall be based on the Eligible
         Director's annual Board retainer (but excluding fees for serving as
         a chairman or member of any committees of the Board, or for
         attending meetings of the Board or any committees thereof) in
         effect on November 1, 2002.

         RESOLVED, That management is authorized and directed to execute
such documents and take such actions as are necessary to implement the
intent of these resolutions.
OAO 458 (Rev. 10/95) Appearance

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF

APPEARANCE

Case Number:

To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record:

Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for

I certify that I am admitted to practice in this court.

Date Signature

Print Name Bar Number

Address

City State Zip Code

Phone Number Fax Number

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 11 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1
11. Statement re computation of per share earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         First quarter ended  First quarter ended
                                                          December 31, 1999    December 31, 1998
                                                          -----------------    -----------------

<S>                                                            <C>                 <C>
Net income in thousands                                        $    3,510          $    3,783


Weighted average shares outstanding                             7,094,289           7,780,105

Assumed exercise of stock options,
  weighted average of incremental shares                          520,122              96,135

Assumed purchase of stock under stock
  purchase plan, weighted average                                  31,318                  --
                                                               ----------          ----------

Diluted shares - adjusted weighted-average
  shares and assumed conversions                                7,645,729           7,876,240
                                                               ==========          ==========


Basic earnings per share                                       $     0.49          $     0.49

Diluted earnings per share                                     $     0.46          $     0.48
</TABLE>
Exhibit 1.9   Certificate of Name Change

|                                                           |                           |  |                                                          
|---------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|(Logo of                                                   | Ministry of               |  | Ontario Corporation NumberNumero de la societe en Ontario
|Ontario                                                    | Consumer and              |  |                                                          
|Government)                                                | Ontario Business Services |  | 268581                                                   
|C E R T I F I CA T E                                       |                           |  |                                                          
|This is to certify that these articles                     |                          
|are efffective on                                          |                          
|MARCH 26 MARS, 2003                                        |                          
|                                                           |                          
|                                                          
|/s/   SIGNATURE                                            |                          
|                                                          
|Director/Directrice                                        |                          
|Business Corporations Act/Loi sur les societes par actions |                          
|                                                           |                          

---

|             | 
|------------ | 
|             | 
|            
|            
|            
|FORM 3       | 
|            
|THE BUSINESS | 
|CORPORATIONS | 
|ACT          | 
|             | 
|            
|THE BUSINESS | 
|            
|             | 
|            
|             | 
|            
|             | 
|            
|             | 
|            
|<page>       | 
|             | 
|            
|             | 
|            
|             | 
|            
|             | 
|            
|            
|             | 
|            
|             | 
|            
|             | 
|             | 
|             | 
|            
|             | 
|            
|            
|             | 
|             | 
|             | 
|            
|             | 
|             | 
|             | 
|             |
#### STATE v. JACKSON

No. 157 PC.

Case below: 38 N.C. App. 628.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 January 1979.
#### STATE v. CHERRY

No. 130PC

No. 35 (Fall Term)

Case below: 51 NC App 118

Petition by State for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 5 May 1981.
**EXHIBIT 32A**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18            U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS            ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of AutoInfo, Inc. (the            “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as            filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the date            hereof (the “Report”), I, Harry M. Wachtel, President and Chief Executive            Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant            to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the            Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the            Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon            request.

 

Dated:            March 25, 2008

 

/s/ Harry M. Wachtel

Harry M. Wachtel

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

----
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-2580

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Stanford C. Griswold lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________ Submitted: January 24, 2024 Filed: February 7, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRUENDER, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Stanford Griswold appeals the within-Guidelines-range sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm

1 The Honorable David Gregory Kays, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.pursuant to a written plea agreement containing an appeal waiver. His counsel has

moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging, inter alia, the voluntariness of Griswold’s plea and his sentence. Griswold has filed a pro se brief challenging his plea, his sentence, and his counsels’ effectiveness; as well as a motion to proceed pro se. We conclude that Griswold’s involuntary-plea claim is not cognizable on direct appeal because he did not move below to withdraw his guilty plea. See United States v. Washington , 515 F.3d 861, 864 (8th Cir. 2008) (stating that a claim that a plea was involuntary or unknowingly entered is not cognizable on direct appeal where the defendant failed to move in the district court to withdraw the guilty plea). In addition, we decline to consider Griswold’s ineffective-assistance claim on direct appeal. See United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez , 449 F.3d 824, 826-27 (8th Cir. 2006) (establishing that ineffective-assistance claims are usually best raised in collateral proceedings where the record can be properly developed). We further conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable, and applicable to Griswold’s challenges to his sentence. See United States v. Scott , 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing de novo the validity and applicability of an appeal waiver); United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 890-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (enforcing appeal waiver if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the waiver, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice). We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, deny Griswold’s motion to proceed pro se as moot, and dismiss this appeal.

______________________________

-2-
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 180 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 180

 To streamline the oil and gas permitting process and to recognize fee 
 ownership for certain oil and gas drilling or spacing units, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 17, 2019

  Mr. Hoeven (for himself and Mr. Lee) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To streamline the oil and gas permitting process and to recognize fee 
 ownership for certain oil and gas drilling or spacing units, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPLIANCE WITH BLM PERMITTING.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law but 
subject to any State requirements, a Bureau of Land Management drilling 
permit shall not be required under the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty 
Management Act of 1982 (30 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) or section 3164.1 of 
title 43, Code of Federal Regulations (or a successor regulation), for 
an action occurring within an oil and gas drilling or spacing unit if--
            (1) less than 50 percent of the minerals within the oil and 
        gas drilling or spacing unit are minerals owned by the Federal 
        Government; and
            (2) the Federal Government does not own or lease the 
        surface estate within the boundaries of the oil and gas 
        drilling or spacing unit.
    (b) Effect.--Nothing in this Act affects the right of the Federal 
Government to receive royalties due to the Federal Government from the 
production of the Federal minerals within the oil and gas drilling or 
spacing unit.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.1

# CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Celanese AG (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Claudio Sonder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 26,  2003

| |  | By: /s/ CLAUDIO SONDER

Name: Claudio Sonder
Title: Chief Executive Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### STATE v. BUCK JUNIOR GOODMAN.

(Filed 20 January, 1967.)

Appeal by defendant from *May, Special Judge,*April 1966 Session of Robeson.

Defendant was charged, in each of three bills of indictment, with the felony of armed robbery defined in G.S. 14-87. The three cases were consolidated for trial; and, in each case, the jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged. The three cases were consolidated for judgment; and one judgment, imposing a prison sentence of 15-20 years, was pronounced. Defendant excepted and appealed.

*Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Bullock for the State.*

*F. D. Hackett for defendant appellant.*

Pee Cubiam.

There was plenary evidence to support the verdict.

The State's evidence tends to show: The robbery occurred at Usher’s Service Station in St. Pauls, Robeson County, about 11:30 on the night of Tuesday, January 4, 1966. Defendant and a confederate, at pistol point, made the service station attendant and two bystanders line up against the wall and later lie down on the floor. The money in the cash register was taken and also the money and billfold of the attendant and of each bystander. In the course of the robbery, defendant said: “Let’s kill them or take them with us.” The other replied, “No, let’s put them on the floor and go.” A witness testified: “They then made us lie down and said not to get up for five minutes or they would kill us.” Defendant was arrested on January 7, 1966.

Defendant did not testify. He offered evidence tending to show he went to his mother’s home in Pembroke, N. C., about 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday, January 4, 1966, and did not leave that night.

Defendant’s only assignment of error, based on his exception to the court’s instruction relating to alibi, is without merit. The instruction given complies with all requirements set forth in *S. v. Spencer,*256 N.C. 487, 124 S.E. 2d 175, the only case cited in defendant’s brief. Decisions in which similar instructions have been approved are cited in *S. v. Allison,*256 N.C. 240, 123 S.E. 2d 465. Indeed, the instruction appears to be in all respects quite favorable to defendant.

No error.