alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1 **CERTIFICATIONS
   
I, Harry Lee Waterfield II, certify that:
  
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006 of Kentucky Investors, Inc.;
  
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and we have:
   
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared,
   
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation, and
   
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting; and
  
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:
   
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
   
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.
  

Date: August 8, 2006
By: /s/ Harry Lee Waterfield II 
Harry Lee Waterfield II 
President
********
Case 1:07-cv-03424-PKC Document 9 Filed 10/16/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       UT
<CIK> 0000861388
<NAME> LG&E ENERGY CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                    PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                         3,372,582
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         761,706
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                              785,902
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                            267,894
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5,188,084
<COMMON>                                            778,660 <F1>
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                              (142)<F2>
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                 540,053
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                    1,318,571
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                         135,328
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                              1,599,603
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  393,202
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                            0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       111,590
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                 0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                               0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                          0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                    1,629,790
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                     5,188,084
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                         2,088,312
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                116,843
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                        1,697,244 <F3>
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                        1,814,087
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                             274,225
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   15,650
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                      289,875
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             90,220
<NET-INCOME>                                        199,655
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           4,957
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                       194,698
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                            120,924
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            52,961
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                              258,630
<EPS-BASIC>                                          1.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          1.50
<FN>
<F1>Includes common stock expense of $(387).
<F2>Represents unrealized loss on marketable securities,
    net of taxes.
<F3>Includes equity in earnings of affiliates of
    $43,799.
</FN>



</TABLE>
1

The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-1799

___________

Patricia Thomas, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

MO Jackson County, * Western District of Missouri.

*

Defendant, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Circuit Court of Jackson County, *

Missouri, and all judges of the Circuit *

Court; State of Missouri, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: September 8, 2009

Filed: October 7, 2009

___________

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Patricia Thomas appeals the district court’s1

 dismissal without prejudice of her

civil rights action and denial of her motion for default judgment. After careful review,
-2-

we conclude that Thomas did not properly serve defendants, and that the district court

did not abuse its discretion in granting defendants’ motion to dismiss on that basis.

See Marshall v. Warwick, 155 F.3d 1027, 1030 (8th Cir. 1998) (standards of review);

see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d), (e), (m); Mo. Rev. Stat. § 506.150.4. In addition, we find

no abuse of discretion in the denial of default judgment. See Norsyn, Inc. v. Desai,

351 F.3d 825, 830 (8th Cir. 2003) (court did not abuse its discretion in denying

plaintiff’s motion for default judgment where defendants were never properly served,

and thus had no obligation to file answer). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT (10)(r)

                       AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                       ---------------------------------

    THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated January 18, 2000, by and
between  C-COR.net CORP., a Pennsylvania  corporation (the "Company"),  and
GERHARD B. NEDERLOF (the "Employee").

                                  BACKGROUND
                                  ----------

     A. The Employee and the Company entered into an Employment Agreement on
July 30, 1997 (the "Employment Contract").

     B. Section 5.01 of the Employment Contract provides certain measures and
protections for the Employee in the event of a change of control of the Company.

     C. The Company and the Employee have mutually determined that the Change of
Control Agreement used by the Company generally for its executive employees
should be modified and that an Amended and Restated Change of Control Agreement
should be entered into between the Company and the Employee.

     D. On even date herewith, the Company and the Employee have entered into an
Amended and Restated Change of Control Agreement.

     E. The Company and the Employee mutually desire to amend the Employment
Contract to delete Section 5.01 concerning change of control provisions which
will be replaced by the Amended and Restated Change of Control Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to this Amendment to Employment Agreement,
intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:

     1. Effective as of the date of this Amendment to Employment Agreement,
Section 5.01 of the Employment Contract concerning change of control, is deleted
and shall be of no
<PAGE>

further force and effect.

     2. In all other respects, the Employment Contract is ratified and affirmed
and shall continue in accordance with its terms.

     3. This Agreement shall be binding upon the successors, heirs, personal
representatives and assigns of each party.

                                    C-COR.net CORP.

                                 By: /s/ David A. Woodle
                                    ----------------------------------

                              Title: President & CEO
                                    ----------------------------------

                                    THE EMPLOYEE:

                                    /s/ Gerhard B. Nederlof
                                    ----------------------------------
                                    Gerhard B. Nederlof

                                       2
Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC Document 10-4 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC Document 10-4 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 1 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 2 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 3 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 4 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 5 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 6 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 7 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 8 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 9 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 10 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 11 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 12 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 13 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 14 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 15 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 16 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 17 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 18 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 19 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 20 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 21 of 22

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF     Document 7      Filed 05/10/2007     Page 22 of 22
Case 7:07-cr-00374-CLB Document 34 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 7:07-cr-00374-CLB Document 34 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 7:07-cr-00374-CLB Document 34 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 7:07-cr-00374-CLB Document 34 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 7:07-cr-00374-CLB Document 34 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 7:07-cr-00374-CLB Document 34 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 6 of 6
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**FORM 10-Q**

 

**Section 1350Certifications**

 

**Quarterended March 31, 2009**

 

I, Herbert Lindo,Chairman, President and Principal Financial Officer of Kenilworth SystemsCorporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)              the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofthe Company for the third quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)              the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  May 14,2009

 
|   | /s/ Herbert Lindo                                             |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Herbert Lindo                                                 |
|   | Chairman, Chief  Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 99.3
                                                                    ------------




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


           In connection with the Annual Report of CDKNet.Com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2002 (the "Report"), I,
Timothy J. Mayette, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

           (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/ Timothy J. Mayette
----------------------------
Timothy J. Mayette
Chief Financial Officer
November 15, 2002
Case 1:07-cv-03376-RLE Document 14 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15142-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15142-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15142-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15142-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15142-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15142-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15142-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15142-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15142-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15142-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15142-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15142-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15142-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
' 

ELE~'~RONIC~LLY FILED 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT C:O~T 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

ORDER 

IN KE: 

Fosarnax Products Liability Litigation 

This Docirment Rckutes to All Cases 

- 

I'I' IS HEREBY ORDERED that Mike Miller of the firm Solberg, Stewart, Millcr & 

Tjon, located at 1129 5"' Avenue South, Fargo, ND 58103, he, and in the sanic hcrchy is, 

Case No: 1 :Oh-MD-1789 

admitted Pro Hur I,'rr.ta as it pertains to the above-referenced ljtigatiorl of this Courl. 

DATED this .!L ' day of May. 20C)S. 

>, , -, -; .' 

BY: ,:( I< . b, , 77(' (- a c=/. ,i 

- ' JOHN F. KEENAN . 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:07-cv-03464-JFK Document 31 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 1 of 2
A0 13hA {Kcv.9!98) Certificate of Good Standing 

United States District Court 

District of North Dakota 

CERTIFICATE OF 

GOOD STANDING 

I, Robert Anslcy, Clerk of this Court, certif). thal 

Mike Miller was duly admitted to 

practicc in this Court on March 9, 1970, 

and is in good standing in this Court. 

Dated at Fargo. Nnrth Ihkota on May 1, 2008. 

Robert finslc\: , 

Clcrk 

, , -. ', ,& 

.C , ..-c ( . , ,: ; ; [. r 

! Dq' Deput), C:lcik - 1,cah Riveland-Foster 

Case 1:07-cv-03464-JFK Document 31 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 2 of 2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

# USS Oklahoma Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Lindsey, H.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Case 1:06-cv-15126-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-14848-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15031-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15031-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15031-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15031-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15031-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15031-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15031-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15031-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15031-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15031-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15031-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15031-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15031-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Description of Nonemployee Directors Compensation



 Exhibit 10.23.2 
 NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTORS COMPENSATION 
 Effective November 1, 2009 
  

			
	Annual retainer	  	$18,750 per quarter, payable in cash or as otherwise elected by a nonemployee director pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan (“Deferred Plan”).
		
	Annual RSU grant1	  	An annual restricted share unit (“RSU”) grant of the number of RSUs equal to $120,000 divided by the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the date of grant ( the
“Grant Date Closing Price”); one year cliff vest.
		
	Initial RSU grant1	  	Upon first appointment or election to the Board, each nonemployee director to receive an initial RSU grant of the number of RSUs equal to $120,000 divided by the Grant Date Closing Price; one
year cliff vest.
		
	Presiding Director	  	Additional retainer is $5,000 per quarter, payable in cash or as elected under Deferred Plan. Increase annual RSU grant value by $20,000.
		
	Audit Committee Chair	  	Additional retainer is $4,500 per quarter, payable in cash or as elected under Deferred Plan.
		
	Human Resources and Compensation Committee Chair	  	Additional retainer is $2,500 per quarter, payable in cash or as elected under Deferred Plan.
		
	Nominating and Governance Committee Chair	  	Additional retainer is $2,500 per quarter, payable in cash or as elected under Deferred Plan
		
	Audit Committee	  	Additional retainer is $500 per quarter for serving on Audit Committee, payable in cash or as elected under Deferred Plan.
		
	Per meeting fee	  	 Special meeting fee for attendance at “excess meetings”: $1,500 for a full day; $750 for a half day or less. An “excess meeting”
is a meeting attended after the nonemployee director has attended a number of meetings equal to the number of regular quarterly board meetings, plus the number of regular committee meetings associated with regular quarterly board meetings, plus two.
An excess meeting excludes meetings attended by a non-committee member and written actions.
  
 Prior to payment, any excess meeting fees must be approved by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of this Board.
  
 Total meeting fees in this category will not exceed $25,000 in any fiscal year. Payable in cash or as elected under the Deferred Plan.

		
	Ad hoc Committee retainer	  	When ad hoc committees are formed to address extraordinary events, the Board will determine an annual retainer to be paid to ad hoc committee members based upon expected effort required. Total
fees in this category will not exceed $25,000 in any fiscal year. Payable in cash or as elected under the Deferred Plan.

  

	1
	 Awards to be granted pursuant to the 2007 Nonemployee Directors’ Equity Incentive Plan.