alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.7
 (Lance Logo)
    
    Lance, Inc.
P.O. Box 32368
Charlotte, NC 28232-2368
Phone: 704/554-1421
  
   Compensation
 
    
    Base pay  $330,000 annually
    
    Participation in the Corporate Annual Incentive Plan with a target incentive
potential of 50% of your annual base salary. If goals are exceeded, theres an
opportunity to earn one times annual salary.
    
    Guaranteed Incentive  for fiscal year 2007, a guarantee of 25% of salary paid in
2007.
    
    Signing Bonus  $20,000 payable within the first month of employment.
    
    Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)Currently the Long-Term Incentive Plans are as follows:
 A.
    
    Three year plan with new plan rolled out each year.
 
    
    Target value will be 45% of base pay with payout potential to be
greater if targeted goals are exceeded.
    
    Measure is Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
 B.
    
    A Five-Year LTIP funded with restricted stock.
 
    
    Your opportunity is 48,000 shares, which represents four (4) years of
participation




---



##### 




    
    Measure is stock appreciation vs. Russell 2000 Index
    
    Time horizon is 5 years (2006  2010).
 Benefits and Perquisites
 
    
    Auto allowance  $1,200.00 per month, subject to applicable withholdings.
    
    Four (4) weeks vacation.
    
    Equity
 
    
    20,000 restricted grant shares with three (3) year cliff vesting.
    
    25,000 stock options at market price, based on closing price
on first day of employment. (Vest 25% per year over four (4) years.)
 Other Benefits
 
    
    Executive Severance Agreement which provides one (1) year base pay, plus target
incentive of Annual Incentive Plan for termination without cause. Medical benefits
would continue during the severance period, provided no other employer coverage is
available and provided the former employee pays the employee cost for the coverage.
    
    Employee Health Plan includes medical, dental, life and AD&D.
    
    Profit Sharing and Retirement Plan after one year eligibility.
    
    401(k) Plan.
    
    Change in Control (CIC) Benefit  we are reviewing our policy, but will provide
CIC benefits that are reasonable.
    
    Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
    
    Employee Assistance Program.




---



##### 



Relocation
 
    
    Will relocate family and household goods to Charlotte, North Carolina area, per the
companys relocation program. Temporary living arrangements are available if needed.
       Sincerely,/s/ Earl D. LeakeE. D. Leake
Vice President  Human ResourcesACCEPTED:/s/ Glenn A. Patcha
    
    1/29/2007Glenn A. Patcha
    
    Date
| 1.   | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CNOOC Limited. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                 |                                 |   |
|--------|----------------------|--------------------------------------|--------|
| By:    |  /s/ Chengyu Fu |                                 |
|   | Name:                | Chengyu Fu                           |   |
|   | Title:               | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |                 |                                 |   |

|   |               |                                                      |   |
|--------|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| By:    |  /s/ Hua Yang |                                                      |
|   | Name:              | Hua Yang                                                  |   |
|   | Title:             | Executive Director, President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |               |                                                      |   |

----
#### STATE v. WILLIAM D. WITHERSPOON.

(Filed 1 November, 1967.)

Appeal by defendant from *McLaughlin, J.,*27 February 1967 Session of Foesyth.

Defendant, represented by court-appointed counsel, was tried upon a bill of indictment which charged that, on 20 January 1967, he endangered and threatened the lives of Florence B. Bates and Mrs. Raymond B. Martin with the use of a pistol and did unlawfully and feloniously take, steal, and carry away from the place of business known as Hunter’s Moon $10.00, the property of Florence B. Bates, the owner of Hunter’s Moon.

Evidence for the State tended to show: Mrs. Florence B. Bates operates Hunter’s Moon, a used clothing store at 216 North Trade Street in Winston-Salem. About 4:00 p.m. on 20 January 1967, defendant, who had been in the store three or four times prior to that day, came in and shook hands with Mrs. Bates. He then took a pair of pants from the rack, went into the dressing room to try them on, and emerged a few minutes later to report that they did not fit. At that time, Mrs. Bates was standing behind the counter and when she turned toward defendant, she saw that he had a pistol in his hand. He told her to give him “the money,” or he would blow her head off. She handed him between ten and twenty one-dollar bills, and he began calling her vile names. He then shot her in the forehead, and she fell behind the counter. Mrs. Raymond Martin, the *715assistant manager, ran out of the store and called the police. Three days later, at the hospital, Mrs. Bates picked defendant from a group of photographs submitted to her by the police.

At the trial, both Mrs. Bates and Mrs. Martin positively identified defendant as the man who shot Mrs. Bates and took the money from the store. Defendant did not testify but offered evidence which tended to show that at the time of the alleged robbery he was asleep in his home. The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged. Judge McLaughlin imposed a sentence of not less than 28 nor more than 30 years, and defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Bruton and Deputy• Attorney General McGal-liard for the State.*

*Richard C. Erwin, Sr., for defendant appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The State’s evidence was more than sufficient to establish defendant’s guilt of the crime specified in the bill of indictment. The judge, in his charge to the jury, correctly applied the law to the evidence and fairly presented the contentions of both the State and defendant. The jury resolved the only contested issue of fact, the identity of the person who robbed and shot Mrs. Bates, against defendant. The judge imposed a sentence, which was within the statutory maximum. G.S. 14-87. It therefore does not constitute the cruel and unusual punishment forbidden by Article I, § 14 of the Constitution of North Carolina. *State v. LePard,*270 N.C. 157, 153 S.E. 2d 875.

No error.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1910 

To rename the Homestead National Monument of America near Beatrice, 

Nebraska, as the Homestead National Historical Park. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 19, 2019 

Mr. SASSE (for himself and Mrs. FISCHER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To rename the Homestead National Monument of America 

near Beatrice, Nebraska, as the Homestead National 

Historical Park. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HOMESTEAD NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first section of the Act of 

5 March 19, 1936 (49 Stat. 1184, chapter 157; 16 U.S.C. 

6 450u) is amended by striking ‘‘designated’’ and all that 

7 follows through the end and inserting ‘‘designated as the 

8 ‘Homestead National Historical Park’.’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1910 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the unit of the National Park System known 

4 as ‘‘The Homestead National Monument of America’’ 

5 shall be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Homestead 

6 National Historical Park’’. 

7 (c) EFFECT.—Nothing in this Act or an amendment 

8 made by this Act authorizes a change in the management 

9 of the Homestead National Historical Park redesignated 

10 under subsection (a). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Enstar Group, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:


         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.


/s/ Cheryl D. Davis
----------------------------------------------------
Cheryl D. Davis
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Corporate
Taxes, and Secretary
May 10, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Enstar Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Enstar Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                       26
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PrimeEnergy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles E. Drimal Jr., Chief Executive Officer of PrimeEnergy Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Charles E. Drimal Jr.                     
|Charles E. Drimal, Jr. Chief Executive
Officer
|September 3, 2009
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                   NAME -- STATE OF INCORPORATION OR FORMATION


<Table>
<Caption>
COMPANY                                   STATE OF INCORPORATION OR FORMATION
-------                                   -----------------------------------
<S>                                       <C>
American Down and Textile, LLC                         Delaware
Brawn of California, Inc.                              California
Clearance World Outlets, LLC                           Delaware
D.M. Advertising, LLC                                  Delaware
Domestications, LLC                                    Delaware
Gump's By Mail, Inc.                                   Delaware
Gump's Corp.                                           California
Hanover Company Store, LLC                             Delaware
Hanover Gifts, Inc.                                    Virginia
Hanover Home Fashions Group, LLC                       Delaware
Hanover Realty, Inc.                                   Virginia
Keystone Internet Services, LLC                        Delaware
LaCrosse Fulfillment, LLC                              Delaware
Scandia Down, LLC                                      Delaware
Silhouettes, LLC                                       Delaware
The Company Office, Inc.                               Delaware
The Company Store Factory, Inc.                        Delaware
The Company Store Group, LLC                           Delaware
The Horn & Hardart Company, Inc.                       New York
</Table>
Case 1:07-cr-00372-LBS Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cr-00372-LBS Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cr-00372-LBS Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X 

TRUSTEES OF THE TEAMSTERS LOCAL 456 

PENSION, HEALTH & WELFARE, ANNUITY, 

EDUCATION & TRAINING, S.U.B. INDUSTRY 

ADVANCEMENT AND LEGAL SERVICES FUNDS and 

THE WESTCHESTER TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 

456, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 -againstREALIFE LAND IMPROVEMENT, INC., 

 Defendant. 

Docket No. 07CV3468 (SCR) 

RULE 7.1 STATEMENT

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X 

 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 [formerly Local General Rule 1.9] and to 

enable District Judges and Magistrate Judges of the Court to evaluate possible disqualification or 

recusal, the undersigned counsel for Realife Land Improvement, Inc. ("Realife") (a private nongovernmental party) certifies that the following are corporate parents, affiliates and/or 

subsidiaries of said party, which are publicly held: 

 1. Realife has no parent corporation. 

 2. No publically held corporation owns 10 percent or more of Realife’s 

 stock. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 June 21, 2007 

 

 PECKAR & ABRAMSON, P.C. 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 By: /s/Sergey Leonidov 

 Sergey Leonidov (SL-4579) 

 546 Fifth Avenue, 17th Floor 

 New York, NY 10036 

 (212) 382-0909 

Case 7:07-cv-03468-SCR Document 5 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
Filed 6/4/14 In re C.R. CA2/5 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS 

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT 

DIVISION FIVE 

In re C.R., a Person Coming Under the 

Juvenile Court Law. 

 B251171 

 (Los Angeles County 

 Super. Ct. No. FJ47413) 

THE PEOPLE, 

 Plaintiff and Respondent, 

 v. 

C.R., 

 Defendant and Appellant. 

 APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Robert 

Totten, Judge. Affirmed. 

 Arielle Bases, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and 

Appellant. 

 No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. 
2 

 Appellant C.R. admitted the allegation that he had committed a robbery in 

violation of Penal Code section 211. The juvenile court sustained the petition, found 

appellant was a person described by Welfare and Institutions Code section 602, adjudged 

appellant to be a ward of the court, and ordered appellant to camp placement for a term of 

six months, with a maximum term of confinement of 4 years. 

 Following his release from camp, appellant failed to report to his probation officer 

and failed to attend a court hearing. Appellant admitted his violation of probation, the 

court found the Welfare and Institutions Code section 777 notice of violation true and 

ordered suitable placement in Rite of Passage of Sierra Ridge. 

 Appellant appeals from the juvenile court’s order. Finding no error, we affirm. 

Facts 

 Because appellant admitted committing the robbery, the facts of the robbery are 

not found in the record. Similarly, appellant admitted violating probation by not 

reporting to his probation officer and no further details are found in the record. 

Discussion 

Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal, and we appointed counsel to represent 

him on appeal. Appellant’s counsel filed an opening brief pursuant to People v. Wende

(1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, and requested this court to independently review the record on 

appeal to determine whether any arguable issues exist. 

On January 23, 2014, we advised appellant he had 30 days in which to personally 

submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. No response has been 

received to date. 

 We have examined the entire record and are satisfied appellant’s attorney has fully 

complied with her responsibilities and no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende, supra, 

25 Cal.3d at p. 441.) 
3 

Disposition 

 The juvenile court’s order is affirmed. 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS 

 MINK, J.

We concur: 

 MOSK, ACTING P. J. 

 KRIEGLER, J. 

 

 Retired Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice 

pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
#### GOLDEN v. REGISTER

No. 103PC

Case below: 50 NC App 650

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 May 1981.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Leisure Hosts, Ltd.,
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert L. Walker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Robert L. Walker

Robert L. Walker
Chief Executive Officer

January 31, 2003
                                  Page 15 of 18
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1892 

To require tribal liaisons to submit to Congress reports on missing and 

murdered Indians. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 19, 2019 

Mr. DAINES introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To require tribal liaisons to submit to Congress reports on 

missing and murdered Indians. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Reporting and 

5 Accountability to Congress Act’’ or the ‘‘TRAC Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORT ON MISSING AND MURDERED INDIANS. 

7 Section 13 of the Indian Law Enforcement Reform 

8 Act (25 U.S.C. 2810) is amended by adding at the end 

9 the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1892 IS

1 ‘‘(e) REPORT ON MISSING AND MURDERED INDI2 ANS.—Each tribal liaison appointed under this section 

3 shall submit to Congress an annual report that includes, 

4 with respect to the district— 

5 ‘‘(1) the number of open missing Indians cases; 

6 ‘‘(2) the number of open murdered Indians 

7 cases; 

8 ‘‘(3) the number of missing and murdered Indi9 ans cases resolved; 

10 ‘‘(4) the number of missing and murdered Indi11 ans cases reported each year; 

12 ‘‘(5) the number of missing and murdered Indi13 ans cold cases; 

14 ‘‘(6) the number of individuals the Department 

15 of Justice has actively working on missing and mur16 dered Indians cases; 

17 ‘‘(7) the number of cases referred to the De18 partment of Justice for prosecution from the Bureau 

19 of Indian Affairs and Tribal law enforcement agen20 cies; and 

21 ‘‘(8) the number cases declined to be prosecuted 

22 by the Department of Justice and the reasons why 

23 each case was not prosecuted.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 10.1





Exhibit 10.1




FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT




This FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as the “First Amendment”) is
made as of the 1st day of June 2009 by and between ISC PROPERTIES, LLC (hereinafter
referred to as “Landlord”) and INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS CORPORATION (hereinafter referred to a
“Tenant”).



WITNESSETH:




WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant are parties to that certain Lease Agreement (hereinafter referred to
as the “Lease”) dated June 1, 2004 for the lease of 61,000 square feet of office and warehouse
space at 4355 Shackleford Road, Norcross Georgia 30093, Gwinnett County, Building 2 in Gwinnett
Park (hereinafter the “Premises”).



WHEREAS, the Lease was to have expired by its terms on May 31, 2009 and Tenant desires to continue
to occupy the Premises beyond the expiration date; and



WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant desire to enter into this First Amendment in order to provide for an
extension of the Lease by Tenant upon terms and conditions mutually acceptable to Landlord and
Tenant;



NOW THEREFORE, Landlord and Tenant amend the Lease as follows:




	 	1.	 	The Lease is hereby extended to May 31, 2012 on all of the same terms, covenants and
conditions as the Lease.






	 	2.	 	Except as expressly modified by this First Amendment, all provisions, terms and
conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.






	 	3.	 	The parties agree that there exist no defaults or events of default under the Lease.






	 	4.	 	In the event a provision of this First Amendment conflicts with a provision of the
Lease, the First Amendment shall supersede and control.






	 	5.	 	All terms and phrases used herein shall have the same meaning as assigned to them in
the Lease.




 


 









 











	 	6.	 	This First Amendment shall not be of any legal effect or consequence unless signed by
Landlord and Tenant, and once signed by Landlord and Tenant it shall be binding upon and
inure to the benefit of Landlord, Tenant and their respective legal representatives,
successors and assigns.






	 	7.	 	This First Amendment has been executed and shall be construed under the laws of the
State of Georgia.





In witness whereof, the undersigned have caused this First Amendment to be executed under seal and
delivered as of the day and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Signed, sealed and delivered as
to 
LANDLORD in the presence of:	 	 	 	ISC PROPERTIES, LLC	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ J. Leland Strange
 

	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	J. Leland Strange	 	 
	/s/ Rebecca Cox	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Notary Public	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Signed, sealed and delivered as
to 
TENANT in the presence of	 	 	 	INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS CORPORATION	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ Bonnie L. Herron
 

	 	 
	Witness:

	 	/s/ Marcy Powers
 

	 	 	 	 	 	Bonnie L. Herron, CFO
Case 1:07-cv-03475-LAP     Document 10      Filed 11/26/2007     Page 1 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-03475-LAP     Document 10      Filed 11/26/2007     Page 2 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-03475-LAP     Document 10      Filed 11/26/2007     Page 3 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-03475-LAP     Document 10      Filed 11/26/2007     Page 4 of 4