alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                          14,865
<SECURITIES>                                    14,162
<RECEIVABLES>                                   94,341
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               128,238
<PP&E>                                          30,180
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,720
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 199,981
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,405
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,766 
<OTHER-SE>                                     169,894 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   199,981
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               109,436
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   99,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   145
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  96
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,060
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,636
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,424
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09 
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                                                               EXHIBIT 12

KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in thousands except ratio data)

<CAPTION>

                                                                                                  Twelve
                                                                                                  Months
                                                             Year Ended December 31,              Ended
                                                  1997      1998      1999      2000     2001     6/30/02
<S>                                            <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Fixed Charges:
  Interest on First Mortgage Bonds              $14,867   $13,936   $12,712   $ 9,503   $ 6,178   $ 4,032
  Interest on Other Long-term Debt                8,597    12,188    13,525    16,367    18,300    19,925
  Interest on Short-term Debt                     3,034     2,455     2,552     3,295     2,329     2,301
  Miscellaneous Interest Charges                    559       634       869     2,523     1,059       905
  Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals     1,700     1,500     1,200     1,700     1,200     1,200
     Total Fixed Charges                        $28,757   $30,713   $30,858   $33,388   $29,066   $28,363

Earnings:
  Net Income                                    $20,746   $21,676   $25,430   $20,763   $21,565   $27,240
  Plus Federal Income Taxes                       9,415     9,785    12,993    17,884     9,553    12,983
  Plus State Income Tax Expense (Credit)          2,190     2,096     2,784     2,457       489    (1,889)
  Plus Fixed Charges (as above)                  28,757    30,713    30,858    33,388    29,066    28,363
     Total Earnings                             $61,108   $64,270   $72,065   $74,492   $60,673   $66,697

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                 2.12      2.09      2.33      2.23      2.09      2.35
</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-2931

___________________________

Sharon L. Meeks

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Department of Human Services

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

____________

Submitted: July 19, 2018

Filed: July 24, 2018 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Sharon Meeks appeals from the order of the District Court granting summary 1

judgment to her former employer the Arkansas Department of Human Servicesin her

The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States DistrictJudge for the Eastern 1

District of Arkansas. 
Title VII retaliation action. After de novo review, we conclude that the District Court

did not err. See Hutton v. Maynard, 812 F.3d 679, 683–84 (8th Cir. 2016) (setting

forth the evidence necessary to survive a motion for summary judgment on a Title VII

retaliation claim); see also Conolly v. Clark, 457 F.3d 872, 876 (8th Cir. 2006) (“[A]

properly supported motion for summary judgment is not defeated by self-serving

affidavits.”).

We affirm the judgment of the District Court. 

______________________________

-2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       UT
<CIK> 0000055387
<NAME> KENTUCKY UTILITIES COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                    PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                         1,554,826
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          14,364
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                              127,815
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             32,399
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1,729,404
<COMMON>                                            307,545 <F1>
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                 0 <F2>
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                 322,467
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                      630,012
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                          40,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                484,830
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   29,942
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                            0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                             0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                 0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                               0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                          0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                      544,620
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                     1,729,404
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                           639,087
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                 34,554
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                          507,408
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                          541,962
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                              97,125
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                      859
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                       97,984
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             27,795
<NET-INCOME>                                         70,189
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           1,692
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                        68,497
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             75,500
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            25,146
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                              177,981
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
<FN>
<F1>Includes common stock expense of $595.
<F2>Represents unrealized loss on marketable securities,
    net of taxes.
</FN>



</TABLE>
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.11.3 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Second Amendment (the
“Second Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of April 17, 2006, as amended as of September 21, 2007, and by an amendment dated September 26, 2008, by and
between Cardinal Health, Inc. (the “Company”) and R. Kerry Clark (the “Executive”), is made and entered into as of the 4th day of August, 2009, by and between the Company and Executive. 
 1. Section 5(a)(viii) of the Agreement is hereby amended to add the following proviso at the end thereof: 
 and provided further, however, that if an individual insurance policy providing such coverage is not available at a reasonable commercial
cost (not exceeding 150% of the cost of coverage of the Company’s medical and dental benefits for active employees), and if such coverage is not otherwise provided to the Executive by the Company on a nontaxable basis, the Welfare Benefits may,
at the option of the Company, instead be provided on a basis under which the costs and premiums thereof are included in the Executive’s income for federal income tax purposes and, in that event, the Executive shall be entitled to receive one or
more additional annual payments (each a “Tax Reimbursement”) in an amount such that, after payment by the Executive of all taxes due for each calendar year during which the Welfare Benefits are provided, including, without
limitation, any income taxes imposed upon each Tax Reimbursement, the Executive retains an amount of each Tax Reimbursement equal to all taxes due on the cost of the Welfare Benefits for the applicable calendar year. The Tax Reimbursement due for
each calendar year for which an amount is included in the Executive’s taxable income as a result of the Welfare Benefits shall be paid to the Executive no later than 60 days after the end of the calendar year for which such income amount is
reported on a form W-2 to the Executive; provided, however, that the payment due for each calendar year shall in all events be made no later than the end of the Executive’s taxable year next following the taxable year in which the
Executive remits the income tax due on the Welfare Benefits for such calendar year; and 
 2. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment,
all terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect and are unmodified hereby. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and
the Company have executed this Amendment as of the day and year set forth above. 
  

			
	EXECUTIVE
	
	 /s/ R. Kerry Clark

	R. Kerry Clark
	
	CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Gregory B. Kenny

	Name:	 	Gregory B. Kenny
	Title:	 	Chairman, Human Resources and Compensation Committee
#### Jerry KUMAR, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Stewart ANDREE; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-16360.

D.C. No. CV-03-00486-LRH/RAM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 4, 2005.*

Decided April 11, 2005.

Jerry Kumar, Reno, NV, pro se.

Eugene J. Wait, Jr., Wait Law Firm, Reno, NV, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before KOZINSKI, HAWKINS, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Jerry Kumar appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing his action for defamation and interference in business. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Dole Food Co. v. Watts,*303 F.3d 1104, 1108 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.

*869Because Kumar appears only to be challenging the district court’s denial of his motion for entry of default judgment against defendant Canada Stockwatch, he has waived the right to challenge any other rulings in the district court’s May 12, 2004 order. *See Indep. Towers of Washington v. Washington,*350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.2003).

The district court properly denied as *moot*Kumar’s request *for*entry of default against Canada Stockwatch. *See Foster v. Carson,*347 F.3d 742, 745 (9th Cir.2003).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### HILL v. PARRISH

No. 50 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 405.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 October 1976.
Case 1:07-cv-03453-GBD Document 7 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gregory Schoepfle, Acting Director, Office of International Economic Affairs; Phone: (202) 693-4887.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of November 2005.

Martha Newton,

Acting Deputy Under Secretary, International Labor Affairs.

[FR Doc. 05-22526 Filed 11-10-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-28-P
"_ _-.- -. -- " -A-._-_A-.... .-- -1. ---'- 't \ r. -- ~ ~ 

: ,, . \.. r s :,.-I){, :,;..:.LJ::. ! :. 

i. 

:- '- : : 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK . . 

~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

IN RE: 

i MASTER FILE 

FOSAMAX PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION 

i I :06-MD-I 789 (SFK) 

Tliis Dorrl~nor~ Hclilres To ,411 Actiolis 

CASE MANAGEblENT ORDER NO. 14 

(Regarding Motions to Remand) 

SOHN F. KEENAh1, Unitcd States 1)istricl .ludgc: 

It has beconic apparent that motions to remand \\zl~icli wcre filed in transfcror 

courts and rcmain pending belorc this Court. as well as thosc which are expcctcd to be filed in 

this Court. \rill raise overlapping challenges to this Court's subject matter jurisdiction. In ordcr 

to resolve thcse jurisdiclional issues promptly and efficiently, it is hcreby ORDERED (hat: 

1. For cases transrerrcd to this Cou~t on or heforc March 1, 2008: All remand 

motions shall be served on the Defendant by March 31. 2008. DeTendant shall sen-c its responsc 

to thcse remand motions on or before April 21, 2008. Plaintiffs may servc a reply on or before 

May 2, 2008. On May 2, 2008, cach party shall file its molion papers and provide the Court 

\\it11 courtesy copies. Defendant also shall file on tlic master docket a list of all cascs with 

rcmand motions pending as of that datc. 

2. For cases transfcrred to this Court aftcr March 1, 2008: On thc last business 

day of Junc 2008 and aery sccond month thereafter, DeTendant shall notify thc Court of any 

ne\v remand motions that have been filed. Defcndant shall file and selvc papers in opposition 

thcreto within fourtecn days. PlaintiSfs affected by such motions may scrve and file rcply 

papers. and provide the Court with courtesy copies ofthcir motion papers, within fourteen days 

thereafter. 

SO ORDERED 

Daled: Ncw York. N.Y. 

Decenlbcr z./ , 200? 

- 

United States District Judse 

Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 19 Filed 12/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-14863-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1557

NATHAN STEVENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL H. HOLLAND, Chairman; MARTY D. HUDSON, Trustee; ELLIOT A. SEGAL, Trustee; JOSEPH H. STAHL, II, Trustee; UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CA-99-54-1) Submitted: January 31, 2001 Decided: February 13, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence L. Moise, III, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellant. Glenda S. Finch, Deputy General Counsel, Christopher F. Clarke, Assistant General Counsel, UMWA HEALTH & RETIREMENT FUNDS, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Nathan Stevens appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stevens v. Holland , No. CA-99-54-1 (W.D. Va. Apr. 4, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

            I, Raymond L. Carr, certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterending June 30, 2007 of Kentucky Investors, Inc.;

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.         The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and we have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared,

 

(b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation, and

 

(c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant's internal controls over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal controls over financial reporting; and

 

5.         The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, tothe registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors:

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, andreport financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 

| Date: August 10, 2007
By:
 /s/Raymond L. Carr  
Raymond L. Carr  
Vice President -- Chief Financial Officer 
 

  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

STEVE RICHARD MCCOLLUM, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 50 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of June, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### STATE v. LEFFINGWELL

No. 80 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 736.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 29 March 1979. Appeal dismissed 29 March 1979.
#### HUMPHRIES v. CONE MILLS CORP.

No. 287 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 612.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 November 1981.
Exhibit 31.2

I,
Douglas J. McCutcheon, certify that:

1.    I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Metron Technology N.V.;

2.    Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.    The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: August 29, 2003                                                                            |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|/s/ DOUGLAS J. McCUTCHEONDouglas J. McCutcheon
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 

---