alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15109-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-0275

_____________________________

DEWEY WAYNE HAMM,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

John F. Simon, Judge.

May 11, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-30003 Summary Calendar

__________________ DR. MICHAEL FOX et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 92-CV-1123
- - - - - - - - - - July 26, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The plaintiffs have filed a motion to dismiss their appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. The Government's plea of lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is rejected. See Frantz v. United States , 29 F.3d 222, 224 (5th Cir. 1994)("This court has not required plaintiffs to specifically enumerate legal theories of recovery in their administrative claims.").No. -2-
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Keane, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Brian T. Keane, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|                         |  |                                                                       
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:    August 5, 2004 |  | /s/ Brian T. KeaneBrian T. Keane
President and Chief Executive Officer

---



QuickLinks
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 3 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 4 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 5 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 6 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 7 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 8 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 9 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 10 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 11 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 12 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 13 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 14 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 15 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 16 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 17 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 18 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 19 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 20 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 21 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 22 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 23 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 24 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 25 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 26 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 27 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 28 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 29 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 30 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 31 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 32 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 33 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 34 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 35 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 36 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 37 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 38 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 39 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 40 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 41 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 42 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 43 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 44 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-33 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 45 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 39 Filed 01/15/2008 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 39 Filed 01/15/2008 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 39 Filed 01/15/2008 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 39 Filed 01/15/2008 Page 4 of 4
#### GOLDING v. TAYLOR

No. 102 PC.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 171.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 3 December 1974.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

M.D.F., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-2965

[November 9, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Kathleen J. Kroll, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2016-CJ001137-XXXX-MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Virginia Murphy, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph D. 

Coronato, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### STATE v. WRIGHT

No. 114 PC.

Case below: 16 N.C. App. 562.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 18 January 1973.
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 32

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Kellwood Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
each of the undersigned hereby individually certify that, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

         and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
         of the Company as of and for the period covered in the Report.


/s/ Hal J. Upbin
---------------------------------------------------
Hal J. Upbin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

December 8, 2004


/s/ W. Lee Capps, III
---------------------------------------------------
W. Lee Capps, III, Executive Vice President Finance
and Chief Financial Officer

December 8, 2004

    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
    other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
    signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
    written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kellwood
    Company and will be retained by Kellwood Company and furnished to the
    Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

    The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and
    Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be
    considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1858 

To ensure the Chief Information Office of the Consumer Product Safety 

Commission has a significant role in decisions related to information 

technology, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 13, 2019 

Mr. MORAN (for himself and Mr. BLUMENTHAL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To ensure the Chief Information Office of the Consumer 

Product Safety Commission has a significant role in decisions related to information technology, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘CPSC CIO Parity 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CIO AUTHORITY. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Consumer Product Safety 

8 Commission (in this section referred to as the ‘‘CommisVerDate Sep 11 2014 16:10 Jun 15, 2019 Jkt 034408 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1858.IS S1858

pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1858 IS

1 sion’’) shall ensure that the Chief Information Officer of 

2 the Commission has a significant role in— 

3 (1) the decision-making process for annual and 

4 multi-year planning, programming, budgeting, and 

5 execution decisions, related reporting requirements, 

6 and reports related to information technology; 

7 (2) the management, governance, and oversight 

8 processes related to information technology; and 

9 (3) the hiring of personnel with information 

10 technology responsibilities. 

11 (b) CIO APPROVAL.—The Chief Information Officer 

12 of the Commission, in consultation with the Chief Finan13 cial Officer of the Commission and budget officials, shall 

14 specify and approve the allocation of amounts appro15 priated to the Commission for information technology, 

16 consistent with the provisions of appropriations Acts, 

17 budget guidelines, and recommendations from the Direc18 tor of the Office of Management and Budget. 

19 (c) ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL.—The Chairman of the 

20 Commission, in consultation with the Chief Information 

21 Officer of the Commission, and subject to the approval 

22 of the Commission, shall appoint— 

23 (1) a Chief Data Officer to serve at the Asso24 ciate Executive Director level; and 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1858 IS

1 (2) a Chief Technologist, to serve on a full- or 

2 part-time basis. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 27, 2014

No. 04-14-00551-CV

Pablo SOLIZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Brooks County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-02-16542-CV

Honorable David Wellington, III, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In this accelerated appeal, the clerk’s record and reporter’s record were originally due on 

August 14, 2014. The court reporter has filed a Notification of Late record stating that the 

reporter’s record was not filed because appellant had failed to pay or make arrangements to pay 

the reporter’s fee for preparing the record and that appellant was not entitled to appeal without 

paying the fee. The reporter also stated she has not been asked to produce the record.

Accordingly, if appellant desires a reporter’s record, he is hereby ORDERED to (1) 

request in writing, no later than September 8, 2014, that a reporter’s record be prepared and (2) 

designate in writing, no later than September 8, 2014, the exhibits and those portions of the 

record to be included in the reporter’s record. Id. The appellant is hereby ORDERED to file a 

copy of the request with both the trial court clerk, id. at 34.6(b)(2), and this court no later than 

September 8, 2014.

It is further ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court no later than 

September 8, 2014 that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been 

made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s 

fee. If appellant fails to provide such written proof within the time provided, this court will only 

consider those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record 

for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

Appellant is reminded that pursuant to our order dated August 22, 2014, he must provide written 

proof to this court no later than September 2, 2014, that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or 

arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without 
paying the clerk’s fee. If appellant fails to file such written proof within the time provided, this 

appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of August, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 2 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 2 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 2 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 3 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 4 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 5 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 6 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 7 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 8 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 9 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 10 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 11 of 11
#### GAYMON v. BARBEE

No. 261 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 627.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 October 1981.
Exhibit 32

             Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
   As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Louisville Gas and
Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company (the "Companies") on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned does hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge,

1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Companies as of the dates and for the period expressed in the Report.


November 12, 2004

                                 /s/  Victor A. Staffieri
                                 Chairman of the Board, President
                                 and Chief Executive Officer
                                 Louisville Gas and Electric Company
                                 Kentucky Utilities Company


                                 /s/  S. Bradford Rives
                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                 Louisville Gas and Electric Company
                                 Kentucky Utilities Company


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       UT
<CIK> 0000055387
<NAME> KENTUCKY UTILITIES COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                    PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                         1,474,479
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          14,641
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                              250,629
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             53,630
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1,793,379
<COMMON>                                            307,545 <F1>
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                 0 <F2>
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                 319,424
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                      626,969
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                          40,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                484,830
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                        0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                            0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        61,500
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                 0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                               0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                          0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                      580,080
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                     1,793,379
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                           443,143
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                 33,221
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                          337,959
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                          371,180
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                              71,963
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                    4,162
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                       76,125
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             18,740
<NET-INCOME>                                         57,385
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           1,128
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                        56,257
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             37,128
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            18,519
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                               81,319
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
<FN>
<F1>Includes common stock expense of $595.
<F2>Represents unrealized loss on marketable securities,
    net of taxes.
</FN>



</TABLE>
Slip Op. 12 - 43

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

 

:

DIAMOND SAWBLADES :

MANUFACTURERS COALITION, :

:

Plaintiff, :

:

 v. : Before: R. Kenton Musgrave, Senior Judge

: Court No. 09-00110

UNITED STATES, :

:

Defendant, :

 :

JUDGMENT

Upon consideration of Plaintiff Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition’s final

itemization of fees and costs awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C.

§ 2412, pursuant to slip opinion 12-12, 816 F. Supp. 2d 1342 (Jan. 26, 2012), and upon others papers

and proceedings, it is hereby:

ORDERED that Defendant pay Plaintiff a total of $73,213.97 within 60 days.

 /s/ R. Kenton Musgrave 

 R. Kenton Musgrave, Senior Judge

Dated: March 27, 2012

 New York, New York
| By/s/ David L.      Cheek                                                                         David      L. CheekPresident      and Chief Executive OfficerNovember      5, 2009 | By/s/  Bert E. Downing,      Jr.                                                                      Bert      E. Downing, Jr.Vice      President, Chief Financial Officer,Corporate      Controller and TreasurerNovember      5, 2009 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Case 1:06-cv-15155-AKH     Document 7      Filed 08/09/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:06-cv-15155-AKH     Document 7      Filed 08/09/2007     Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. HARRIS

No. 190 PC.

No. 113 (Fall Term).

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 652.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 4 October 1978.