alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SCWC-14-0001151
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. RYAN NAKAMITSU, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-14-0001151; 1DTA-14-02783)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C
. J
. , N a k a y a m a , M c K e n n a , P o l l a c k a n d W i l s o n , J J
. )



### Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Ryan Nakamitsu’s application for writ of certiorari filed on April 25, 2016, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, June 6, 2016 Alen M. Kaneshiro for petitioner Sonja P. McCullen for respondent /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0001151 06-JUN-2016 09:16 AM
#### STATE v. NELSON

No. 9.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 458.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 30 December 1974.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

October 22, 2012

s1015

Order 

October 22, 2012

145281

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145281

COA: 308572

Kent CC: 04-001615-FC

JERRY LOUIS DAVID,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 20, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 70859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23200]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, Estrogen and Neural Pathways in 
Female Pain Syndromes.
    Date: November 30, 2005.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Jon M. Ranhand, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892. (301) 435-6884. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83f1e2edebe2ede7e9c3eee2eaefadedeaebade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7b091a15131a151f113b161a121755151213551c140d">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.864, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: November 8, 2005.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-23200 Filed 11-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 55 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 1 of 10Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 55 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 2 of 10Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 55 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 3 of 10Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 55 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 4 of 10Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 55 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 5 of 10Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 55 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 6 of 10Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 55 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 7 of 10Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 55 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 8 of 10Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 55 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 9 of 10Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 55 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 10 of 10
#### CASEY v. WAKE COUNTY

No. 150 PC.

Case below: 45 N.C. App. 522.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 June 1980.
#### STATE v. BOARD

No. 50 PC.

No. 120 (Fall Term).

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 581.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 4 October 1978.
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 1 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 2 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 3 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 4 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 5 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 6 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 7 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 8 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 9 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 10 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 11 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 12 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 13 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 14 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 15 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 16 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 17 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 18 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 19 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 20 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 21 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 22 of 23Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 48 Filed 07/03/2008 Page 23 of 23
Construction

Toolbox Talk Electrical Safety: Power

Working near or with electricity can be hazardous. A 

mistake around electricity could easily be your last. Even 

experienced electricians and electrical power installers 

must stay on guard. The main types of electrical injuries 

are electric shock, burns, falls caused by coming in contact 

with electrical energy, and electrocution.

Vinny’s Story 

Vinny and two co-workers were installing individual 

electrical units in an apartment building under 

construction. The circuit breaker protecting the 

main breaker box for the entire building had been 

labeled but not locked out. The crew began wiping 

down the individual units before a pre-startup 

inspection by the building department. They did 

not know that the utility workers had energized the 

internal circuit. As Vinny wiped down one of the 

units, his right hand contacted an electrical circuit 

and his left contacted a bar on the electrical circuit. 

This created a path for electrical current to flow. He 

died from electrocution. 

# What caused this incident? 

# How could this have been prevented?

# Have you ever been electrically shocked and 

injured on the job, or do you know someone 

who has? If so, what happened? 

Remember This

• Always make sure circuits are de-energized before 

doing any type of work on electrical circuits or around 

electricity, by testing with an AC voltage detector.

• Always use lockout devices to prevent a circuit from 

becoming live.

• Always put a tag on the locked electrical circuit to 

warn others that they should not turn it on.

• Always be aware of equipment marked high-voltage, 

which can store lethal energy even when disconnected 

from the power source.

How can we stay safe today?

What will we do at the worksite to prevent injuries or deaths from electrical power?

OSHA Standards: 1926.416 and 1026.417
Construction

Toolbox Talk Electrical Safety: Power

; Always de-energize, lock out, and tag all electrical systems before working on electrical circuits.

; Always verify that electrical systems are de-energized, by testing with an AC voltage detector.

GET 

INFORMATION

CDC/NIOSH INFO: 1-800-CDC-INFO (1-800-232-4636) | TTY: 1-800-232-6348 | cdc.gov/info | cdc.gov/niosh

CPWR: Contact 301-578-8500 | cpwr-r2p@cpwr.com | www.cpwr.com/toolbox-talks

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2022-141 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB2022141 | August 2022
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 7 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 7 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 7 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

         I, Scott Landow, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Parentech,
Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
         caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

                  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
         about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
         of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
         evaluation; and

                  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
         registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
         quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
         or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditor and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

                  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
         the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
         which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
         ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
         and

                  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
         management or other employees who have a significant role in the
         registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


Dated:  June 24, 2004


         /s/ Scott Landow
         ----------------
         Scott Landow, Chief Executive Officer
| 1.     | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and                                                     |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.     | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CNOOC Limited. |

|   |         |
|--------|--------------|
| By:    | /s/ Hua Yang |   |
|   | Name:        | Hua Yang |   |
|   | Title:       | Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |   |

|   |          |
|--------|---------------|
| By:    | /s/ Hua Zhong |   |
|   | Name:         | Hua Zhong |   |
|   | Title:        | Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
Case 1:07-cv-03376-RLE Document 12 Filed 03/11/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03376-RLE Document 12 Filed 03/11/2008 Page 2 of 2
Construction

Toolbox Talk

Repetitive Motion:

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a repetitive-motion 

injury. It occurs when an important nerve is regularly 

pinched and compressed. Workers with CTS commonly 

feel pain, weakness, and tingling, usually in the first 

three fingers of the hand and the base of the thumb. 

Symptoms are often most severe during sleep. Serious 

cases can be disabling. 

Ann’s Story 

Ann first noticed symptoms of CTS when her fingers 

would tingle and her hand and wrist would begin 

to feel numb the longer she held a tool. She went 

to her doctor and explained the type of work she 

performed and the problems she was having 

holding tools. The doctor did some tests and told 

Ann that she had CTS. 

# What caused the CTS? 

# How could this have been prevented?

# Have you ever had symptoms of CTS or do you 

know someone who has? If so, what happened?

Remember This

• Use tools designed for the job.

• Use tools that keep your wrist in a neutral position, 

rather than a forward or backward bend, to minimize 

force. 

• Use a two-handled tool that has a spring return so the 

handle automatically returns to the starting position, 

and has a locking position if continuous force is 

required. 

• Wear gloves or use anti-vibration wraps to improve 

grip strength and lessen the shock of vibrating tools.

• Rest your hands periodically. 

• Reduce repetitive movements. 

• Vary your arm’s position when performing an activity.

How can we stay safe today?

What will we do at the worksite to prevent repetitive motions that can cause carpal tunnel syndrome?

OSHA General Duty Clause, Section 5(a)(1) of the OSH Act
Construction

Toolbox Talk

Repetitive Motion:

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Learn more at 

Choose Hand 

Safety website.

; Use tools designed for the job.

; Wear gloves or use anti-vibration wraps to lessen shock and vibration.

; Rest your hands periodically.

; Keep your wrists in a neutral position. 

GET 

INFORMATION 

CDC/NIOSH INFO: 1-800-CDC-INFO (1-800-232-4636) | TTY: 1-800-232-6348 | cdc.gov/info | cdc.gov/niosh

CPWR: Contact 301-578-8500 | cpwr-r2p@cpwr.com | www.cpwr.com/toolbox-talks

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2022-131 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB2022131 | August 2022
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 14, 2005, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Specialty Vehicle Institute of America (“SVIA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Specialty Vehicle Institute of America, Irvine, CA. The nature and scope of SVIA's standards development activities are: For the development of a proposed voluntary standard (ANSI/SVIA-1-2006) addressing the design, configuration and performance aspects of four wheel all-terrain vehicles (“ATVs”), as a revision to the current voluntary standard (ANSI/SVIA-1-2001).

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 05-23257 Filed 11-23-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
#### TRUST CO. v. MURPHY

No. 178 PC.

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 760.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 29 August 1978. Motion of plaintiff to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 29 August 1978.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 224 (Tuesday, November 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 70652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23110]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5234]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Masterpieces From an English Country House: The 
Fitzwilliam Collection''

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
[79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459], Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 [112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.], Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999 [64 FR 56014], Delegation of 
Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999 [64 FR 57920], as amended, and 
Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I 
hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition, 
``Masterpieces from an English Country House: The Fitzwilliam 
Collection,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign lender. I also determine 
that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Chrysler 
Museum of Art, Norfolk, Virginia, from on or about April 28, 2006, to 
on or about August 13, 2006, the Memphis Brooks Museum of Art, Memphis, 
Tennessee, from on or about September 15, 2006, to on or about December 
3, 2006, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. Public Notice of these determinations is ordered 
to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, such as a 
list of exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, 202/453-8052, and the address is United 
States Department of State, SA-44, Room 700, 301 4th Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: November 15, 2005.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05-23110 Filed 11-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40530 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EVERETT NEIL AUSTIN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-96-CR-286-1

- - - - - - - - - - December 4, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Everett Neil Austin appeals his conviction for possession of 919 kilograms of marijuana with intent to distribute. He contends that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to support the verdict in that the Government failed to prove that he knew the marijuana was concealed in his tractor-trailer. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and hold that the evidence was sufficient to support the elements of2

possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979); United States v. Gonzales , 121 F.3d 928, 936 (5th Cir. 1997). Besides showing that Austin had control of the truck that contained the drugs, the Government produced additional indicia of proof permitting an inference that Austin knew he was carrying the marijuana. See United States v. Lopez , 70 F.3d 575, 577 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 1867 (1996); United States v. Pennington , 20 F.3d 593, 598 (5th Cir. 1994). AFFIRMED.