Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 222 / Friday, November 18, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 69897 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2005–22006; Airspace 

Docket No. 05–ACE–30] 

Modification of Class E Airspace; 

Sheldon Municipal Airport, IA 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of 

effective date. 

SUMMARY: This document confirms the 

effective date of the direct final rule 

which revises Class E airspace at 

Sheldon Municipal Airport, IA. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, December 

22, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, 

Airspace Branch, ACE–502A, DOT 

Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 

Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, 

Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 

(816) 329–2524. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA 

published this direct final rule with a 

request for comments in the Federal 

Register on October 3, 2005 (70 FR 

57497). The FAA uses the direct final 

rulemaking procedure for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA 

believes that there will be no adverse 

public comment. This direct final rule 

advised the public that no adverse 

comments were anticipated, and that 

unless a written adverse comment, or a 

written notice of intent to submit such 

an adverse comment, were received 

within the comment period, the 

regulation would become effective on 

December 22, 2005. No adverse 

comments were received, and thus this 

notice confirms that this direct final rule 

will become effective on that date. 

Issued in Kansas City, MO on November 2, 

2005. 

Elizabeth S. Wallis, 

Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 05–22915 Filed 11–17–05; 8:45am] 

BILLING CODE 4929–13–M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2005–22005; Airspace 

Docket No. 05–ACE–29] 

Modification of Class E Airspace; 

Wellington Municipal Airport, KS 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of 

effective date. 

SUMMARY: This document confirms the 

effective date of the direct final rule 

which revises Class E airspace at 

Wellington Municipal Airport, KS. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, December 

22, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, 

Airspace Branch, ACE–520A, DOT 

Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 

Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, 

Kansas City, MO 64296; telephone: 

(816) 329–2524. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA 

published this direct final rule with a 

request for comments in the Federal 

Register on October 3, 2005 (70 FR 

57498). The FAA uses the direct final 

rulemaking procedure for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA 

believes that there will be no adverse 

public comment. This direct final rule 

advised the public that no adverse 

comments were anticipated, and that 

unless a written adverse comment, or a 

written notice of intent to submit such 

an adverse comment, were received 

within the comment period, the 

regulation would become effective on 

December 22, 2005. No adverse 

comments were received, and thus this 

notice confirms that this direct final rule 

will become effective on that date. 

Issued in Kansas City, MO on November 2, 

2005. 

Elizabeth S. Wallis, 

Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 05–22916 Filed 11–17–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4929–13–M 

NATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION AND 

PRIVACY COMPACT COUNCIL 

28 CFR Part 907 

[NCPPC 112] 

Compact Council Procedures for 

Compliant Conduct and Responsible 

Use of the Interstate Identification 

Index (III) System for Noncriminal 

Justice Purposes 

AGENCY: National Crime Prevention and 

Privacy Compact Council. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Compact Council, 

established pursuant to the National 

Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact 

(Compact), is publishing a rule that 

establishes procedures for ensuring 

compliant conduct and responsible use 

of the Interstate Identification Index (III) 

System for noncriminal justice purposes 

as authorized by Article VI of the 

Compact. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule is effective on 

December 19, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Donna M. Uzzell, Compact Council 

Chairman, Florida Department of Law 

Enforcement, 2331 Philips Road, 

Tallahassee, Florida 32308–5333, 

telephone number (850) 410–7100. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

document finalizes the Compact 

Council rule proposed in the Federal 

Register on February 17, 2005 (70 FR 

8050). The Compact Council requested 

that comments on the proposed rule be 

provided by March 21, 2005. Comments 

were not submitted; however, the 

Council made editorial changes. 

Administrative Procedures and 

Executive Orders 

Administrative Procedure Act 

This rule is published by the Compact 

Council as authorized by the National 

Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact 

(Compact), an interstate and FederalState compact which was approved and 

enacted into legislation by Congress 

pursuant to Pub. L. 105–251. The 

Compact Council is composed of 15 

members (with 11 state and local 

governmental representatives). 

The Compact Council is not a federal 

agency as defined in the Administrative 

Procedure Act. Accordingly, rulemaking 

by the Compact Council pursuant to the 

Compact is not subject to the Act. 

However, the Compact specifically 

provides that the Compact Council shall 

prescribe rules and procedures for the 

effective and proper use of the Interstate 

Identification Index (III) System for 

noncriminal justice purposes, and 

69898 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 222 / Friday, November 18, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 

mandates that such rules, procedures, or 

standards established by the Compact 

Council be published in the Federal 

Register. See 42 U.S.C. 14616, Articles 

II(4), VI(a)(1), and VI(e). This 

publication complies with those 

requirements. 

Executive Order 12866 

The Compact Council is not an 

executive department or independent 

regulatory agency as defined in 44 

U.S.C. 3502; accordingly, Executive 

Order 12866 is not applicable. 

Executive Order 13132 

The Compact Council is not an 

executive department or independent 

regulatory agency as defined in 44 

U.S.C. 3502; accordingly, Executive 

Order 13132 is not applicable. 

Nonetheless, this rule fully complies 

with the intent that the national 

government should be deferential to the 

States when taking action that affects 

the policymaking discretion of the 

States. 

Executive Order 12988 

The Compact Council is not an 

executive agency or independent 

establishment as defined in 5 U.S.C. 

105; accordingly, Executive Order 12988 

is not applicable. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

Approximately 75 percent of the 

Compact Council members are 

representatives of state and local 

governments; accordingly, rules 

prescribed by the Compact Council are 

not Federal mandates. No actions are 

deemed necessary under the provisions 

of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995. 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 

The Small Business Regulatory 

Enforcement Fairness Act (Title 5, 

U.S.C. 801–804) is not applicable to the 

Compact Council’s rule because the 

Compact Council is not a ‘‘Federal 

agency’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(1). 

Likewise, the reporting requirement of 

the Congressional Review Act (Subtitle 

E of the Small Business Regulatory 

Enforcement Fairness Act) does not 

apply. See 5 U.S.C. 804. 

List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 907 

Privacy, Accounting, Auditing. 

■ The National Crime Prevention and 

Privacy Compact Council is adding part 

907 to chapter IX of title 28 Code of 

Federal Regulations to read as follows: 

PART 907—COMPACT COUNCIL 

PROCEDURES FOR COMPLIANT 

CONDUCT AND RESPONSIBLE USE 

OF THE INTERSTATE IDENTIFICATION 

INDEX (III) SYSTEM FOR 

NONCRIMINAL JUSTICE PURPOSES 

Sec. 

907.1 Purpose and authority. 

907.2 Applicability. 

907.3 Assessing compliance. 

907.4 Methodology for resolving 

noncompliance. 

907.5 Sanction adjudication. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 14616. 

§ 907.1 Purpose and authority. 

Part 907 establishes policies and 

procedures to ensure that use of the III 

System for noncriminal justice purposes 

complies with the National Crime 

Prevention and Privacy Compact 

(Compact) and with rules, standards, 

and procedures established by the 

Compact Council regarding application 

and response procedures, record 

dissemination and use, response times, 

data quality, system security, accuracy, 

privacy protection, and other aspects of 

III System operation for noncriminal 

justice purposes. The rule is established 

pursuant to Article VI of the Compact, 

which authorizes the Compact Council 

to promulgate rules, procedures, and 

standards governing the use of the III 

System for noncriminal justice 

purposes. The rule requires responsible 

authorized access to the System and 

proper use of records that are obtained 

from the System. The rule provides 

comprehensive procedures for a 

coordinated compliance effort among 

the Compact Council, the FBI, and local, 

State and Federal government agencies, 

and encourages the cooperation of all 

affected parties. 

§ 907.2 Applicability. 

This rule applies to III System access 

for noncriminal justice purposes as 

covered by the Compact, see 42 U.S.C. 

14614 and 14616, and use of 

information obtained by means of the 

System for such purposes. The rule 

establishes procedures for ensuring that 

the FBI’s and Compact Party States’

criminal history record repositories 

carry out their responsibilities under the 

Compact, as set out in the National 

Fingerprint File (NFF) Qualification 

Requirements, and that local, State and 

Federal government agencies using the 

III System for noncriminal justice 

purposes comply with the Compact and 

with applicable Compact Council rules. 

§ 907.3 Assessing compliance. 

(a) The FBI CJIS Division staff 

regularly conducts systematic 

compliance reviews of state repositories. 

These reviews may include, as 

necessary, reviews of III System user 

agencies, including governmental and 

nongovernmental noncriminal justice 

entities that submit fingerprints to the 

State repositories and criminal justice 

and noncriminal justice agencies with 

direct access to the III System. These 

reviews may include, as necessary, the 

governmental and nongovernmental 

noncriminal justice entities authorized 

to submit fingerprints directly to the 

FBI. The reviews may consist of 

systematic analyses and evaluations, 

including on-site investigations, and 

shall be as comprehensive as necessary 

to adequately ensure compliance with 

the Compact and Compact Council 

rules. Violations may also be reported or 

detected independently of a review. 

(b) The FBI CJIS Division staff or the 

audit team established to review the 

FBI’s noncriminal justice use of the III 

System shall prepare a draft report 

describing the nature and results of each 

review and set out all findings of 

compliance and noncompliance, 

including any reasons for 

noncompliance and the circumstances 

surrounding the noncompliance. If the 

agency under review is the FBI or 

another Federal agency, the draft report 

shall be forwarded to the FBI Compact 

Officer. If the agency under review is a 

State or local agency in a Party State, the 

draft report shall be forwarded to the 

State Compact Officer. If the agency 

under review is a State or local agency 

in a Nonparty State, the draft report 

shall be forwarded to the chief 

administrator of the State repository. 

(c) The Compact Officer of the FBI or 

a Party State or the chief administrator 

of the State repository in a Nonparty 

State shall be afforded the opportunity 

to forward comments and supporting 

materials to the FBI CJIS Division staff 

or to the audit team. 

(d) The FBI CJIS Division staff or the 

audit team shall review any comments 

and materials received and shall 

incorporate applicable revisions into a 

final report. The final report shall be 

provided to the Compact Officer of the 

FBI or a Party State or the chief 

administrator of the State repository in 

a Nonparty State to whom the draft 

report was sent. If the agency under 

review is a State or local agency, a copy 

of the report shall be provided to the 

FBI Compact Officer. If the agency 

under review is being reviewed for the 

first time, the letter transmitting the 

report shall provide that sanctions will 

not be imposed regarding any 

deficiencies set out in the report. The 

letter shall also advise, however, that 

the deficiencies must be remedied and 

failure to do so before the agency is 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 222 / Friday, November 18, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 69899 

reviewed again will result in the 

initiation of remedial action pursuant to 

§ 907.4. 

§ 907.4 Methodology for resolving 

noncompliance. 

(a) Subsequent to each compliance 

review that is not a first-time agency 

review, the final report shall be 

forwarded to the Compact Council 

Sanctions Committee (Sanctions 

Committee). The Sanctions Committee 

shall review the report and if it 

concludes that no violations occurred or 

no violations occurred that are serious 

enough to require further action, it shall 

forward its conclusions and 

recommendations to the Compact 

Council Chairman. If the Compact 

Council Chairman approves the 

Sanctions Committee’s 

recommendations, the Compact Council 

Chairman shall send a letter to this 

effect to the FBI or Party State Compact 

Officer or the chief administrator of the 

state repository in a Nonparty State that 

has executed a Memorandum of 

Understanding. For all remaining states, 

the Compact Council Chairman shall 

forward the recommendations to the FBI 

Director or Designee who, upon 

approval of the recommendations, shall 

send a letter to this effect to the chief 

administrator of the state repository. If 

the agency under review is a state or 

local agency, a copy of the Compact 

Council Chairman’s or FBI Director’s or 

Designee’s letter shall be provided to the 

FBI Compact Officer. 

(b) Should the Sanctions Committee 

conclude that a violation has occurred 

that is serious enough to require redress, 

the Sanctions Committee shall 

recommend to the Compact Council a 

course of action necessary to bring the 

offending agency into compliance and 

require the offending agency to provide 

assurances that subsequent violations 

will not occur. In making its 

recommendation, the Sanctions 

Committee shall consider the minimal 

action necessary to ensure compliance 

or shall explain why corrective action is 

not required. This may include, but not 

be limited to, requiring a plan of action 

by the offending agency to achieve 

compliance, with benchmarks and 

performance measures, and/or requiring 

the agency to seek technical assistance 

to identify sources of the problem and 

proposed resolutions. If the Compact 

Council or, when applicable, the FBI 

Director or Designee approves the 

Sanctions Committee’s 

recommendations, progressive actions 

shall be initiated as set forth below. The 

letters referred to in this paragraph 

(907.4(b)) shall be from the Compact 

Council Chairman when the offending 

agency is the FBI or another federal 

agency, a state or local agency in a Party 

State, or a state or local agency in a 

Nonparty State that has executed a 

Memorandum of Understanding. The 

documentation and written responses 

from the aforementioned agencies to 

such letters shall be sent to the Compact 

Council Chairman. For all remaining 

states, the Compact Council Chairman 

shall forward the Compact Council’s 

recommendations to the FBI Director or 

Designee who, upon approval of the 

recommendations, shall send the letters; 

accordingly, all documentation and 

written responses relating to the FBI 

Director’s or Designee’s letters shall be 

sent to the FBI Director or Designee who 

shall make such letters available to the 

Compact Council Chairman. If the 

offending agency is an agency other 

than the FBI or a state repository, any 

response letters from the offending 

agency shall be sent to the Compact 

Officer of the FBI or Party State or the 

chief administrator of the state 

repository in a Nonparty State and shall 

outline the course of action the 

offending agency will undertake to 

correct the deficiencies and provide 

assurances that subsequent violations 

will not recur. 

(1) As noted above, a letter shall be 

sent to the Compact Officer of the FBI 

or Party State or the chief administrator 

of the state repository in a Nonparty 

State identifying the violations and 

setting out the actions necessary to 

come into compliance. The letter shall 

provide that if compliance is not 

achieved and assurances provided that 

minimize the probability that 

subsequent violations will occur, and 

non-compliance is not excused, the 

Compact Council may authorize the FBI 

to refuse to process requests for criminal 

history record checks for noncriminal 

justice purposes from the offending 

agency and, if the offending agency is a 

criminal justice agency, may request the 

Director of the FBI to take appropriate 

action against the offending agency 

consistent with the recommendations of 

the Compact Council. The letter shall 

direct the Compact Officer of the FBI or 

Party State or the chief administrator of 

the state repository in a Nonparty State 

to submit a written response within 30 

calendar days from the date of the letter, 

unless a more expeditious response is 

required. If the offending agency is a 

state or local agency, a copy of the 

Compact Council Chairman’s or FBI 

Director’s or Designee’s letter shall be 

provided to the FBI Compact Officer. 

The Compact Council Chairman shall 

refer the response letter to the Sanctions 

Committee for appropriate action. 

(2) If the Sanctions Committee deems 

the response letter under paragraph 

(b)(1) of this section to be insufficient, 

or if no response is received within the 

allotted time, the Sanctions Committee 

shall report its finding to the Compact 

Council. If the Compact Council agrees 

with the Sanctions Committee’s finding, 

a letter shall be sent to the Director of 

the FBI (if the offending agency is the 

FBI or another federal agency) or to the 

head of the state agency in which the 

state repository resides (if the offending 

agency is a state or local agency), 

requesting assistance in correcting the 

deficiencies. The letter shall provide 

that the offending agency is being 

placed on probationary status. A copy of 

the letter shall be sent to the Compact 

Officer of the FBI or Party State or the 

chief administrator of the state 

repository in a Nonparty State. If the 

offending agency is a state or local 

agency, a copy of the Compact Council 

Chairman’s or FBI Director’s or 

Designee’s letter shall be provided to the 

FBI Compact Officer. A written response 

to the letter shall be required within 20 

calendar days from the date of the letter 

unless a more expeditious response is 

required. The Compact Council 

Chairman shall refer the response letter 

to the Sanctions Committee for 

appropriate action. 

(3) If the Sanctions Committee deems 

the response letter under paragraph 

(b)(2) of this section to be insufficient, 

or if no response is received within the 

allotted time, the Sanctions Committee 

shall report its finding to the Compact 

Council. If the Compact Council agrees 

with the Sanctions Committee’s finding, 

a letter shall be sent to the U. S. 

Attorney General (if the offending 

agency is the FBI or another federal 

agency) or to the elected/appointed state 

official who has oversight of the 

department in which the state 

repository resides (if the offending 

agency is a state or local agency), 

requesting assistance in correcting the 

deficiencies. If the state official is not 

the Governor, a copy of the letter shall 

be sent to the Governor. A copy of the 

letter shall also be sent to the FBI 

Compact Officer and (if the offending 

agency is a state or local agency) to the 

State Compact Officer or the chief 

administrator of the state repository in 

a Nonparty State. The letter shall 

provide that a written response is 

required within 20 calendar days of the 

date of the letter, and that if a sufficient 

response is not received within that 

time, sanctions may be imposed that 

could result in suspension of the 

offending agency’s access to the III 

System for noncriminal justice 

69900 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 222 / Friday, November 18, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 

purposes. The Compact Council 

Chairman shall refer the response letter 

to the Sanctions Committee for 

appropriate action. 

(4) If no response letter is received 

under paragraph (b)(3) of this section 

within the allotted time, or if the 

Sanctions Committee deems the 

response to be insufficient, the 

Sanctions Committee shall report its 

finding to the Compact Council. If the 

Compact Council agrees with the 

Sanctions Committee’s finding, the 

Compact Council Chairman or the FBI 

Director or Designee shall direct the FBI 

Compact Officer to take appropriate 

action to suspend noncriminal justice 

access to the III System by the offending 

agency. If the offending agency is a 

criminal justice agency, the Compact 

Council Chairman shall request the 

Director of the FBI to take appropriate 

action to suspend noncriminal justice 

access to the III System by the offending 

agency. 

(5) Reinstatement of full service by 

the FBI shall occur after the Compact 

Officer of the FBI or a Party State or the 

chief administrator of the state 

repository in a Nonparty State provides 

satisfactory documentation that the 

deficiencies have been corrected or a 

process has been initiated to correct the 

deficiencies. Upon approval of the 

documentation by the Sanctions 

Committee in consultation with the 

Compact Council Chairman, the 

Compact Council Chairman or the FBI 

Director or Designee shall request the 

FBI Compact Officer to take appropriate 

action to reinstate full service. Letters to 

this effect shall be sent to all persons 

who have previously received letters 

relating to the deficiencies and resulting 

suspension of service. The decision to 

reinstate full service shall be considered 

for ratification by the Compact Council 

at its next regularly scheduled meeting. 

(c) For good cause, the Compact 

Council Chairman and the FBI Director 

or Designee shall be authorized to 

extend the number of days allowed for 

the response letters required by 

paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this 

section. 

§ 907.5 Sanction adjudication. 

(a) A Compact Officer of the FBI or a 

Party State or the chief administrator of 

the state repository in a Nonparty State 

may dispute a sanction under this Part 

by asking the Compact Council 

Chairman for an opportunity to address 

the Compact Council. 

(b) Unresolved disputes based on the 

Compact Council’s issuance of sanctions 

under this Part may be referred to the 

Compact Council Dispute Adjudication 

Committee when pertaining to disputes 

described under ARTICLE XI(a) of the 

Compact. 

(c) Nothing prohibits the Compact 

Council from requesting the FBI to 

exercise immediate and necessary 

action to preserve the integrity of the III 

System pursuant to Article XI(b) of the 

Compact. 

Dated: November 1, 2005. 

Donna M. Uzzell, 

Compact Council Chairman. 

[FR Doc. 05–22850 Filed 11–17–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–02–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 271 

[FRL–7998–8] 

Massachusetts: Extension of Interim 

Authorization of State Hazardous 

Waste Management Program Revision 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Immediate final rule. 

SUMMARY: The EPA is extending the 

expiration date from January 1, 2006 to 

January 1, 2011 for the interim 

authorization under the Resource 

Conservation and Recovery Act, of the 

Massachusetts program for regulating 

Cathode Ray Tubes (‘‘CRTs’’). 

Massachusetts was granted interim 

authorization to assume the 

responsibility under the Toxicity 

Characteristics Rule (‘‘TC Rule’’) for 

regulating CRTs, on November 15, 2000 

with an expiration date of January 1, 

2003. This expiration date was 

subsequently extended until January 1, 

2006. As this interim authorization is 

soon due to expire, an extension is 

needed for the reasons explained below. 

EPA is publishing this rule to authorize 

the extension without a prior proposal 

because we believe this action is not 

controversial and do not expect 

comments that oppose it. Unless we get 

written comments which oppose this 

extension during the comment period, 

the decision to extend the interim 

authorization will take effect. If we get 

comments that oppose this action, we 

will publish a document in the Federal 

Register withdrawing this rule before it 

takes effect and the separate document 

in the proposed rules section of this 

Federal Register will serve as the 

proposal to authorize the changes. 

DATES: This extension of the interim 

authorization will become effective on 

January 17, 2006 and remain in effect 

until January 1, 2011 unless EPA 

receives adverse written comment by 

December 19, 2005. If EPA receives such 

comment, it will publish a timely 

withdrawal of this immediate final rule 

in the Federal Register and inform the 

public that this extended authorization 

will not take immediate effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments by 

one of the following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions for submitting comments. 

2. E-mail: Robin Biscaia, 

biscaia.robin@epa.gov. 

3. Mail: Robin Biscaia, Hazardous 

Waste Unit (CHW), EPA New England, 

One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (CHW), 

Boston, MA 02114–2023; 

4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver 

your comments to Robin Biscaia, 

Hazardous Waste Unit, EPA New 

England, One Congress Street, Suite 

1100 (CHW), Boston, MA 02114–2023; 

Instructions: We must receive your 

comments by December 19, 2005. Do 

not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through regulations.gov, or email. The Federal regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an e-mail 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through regulations.gov, your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Dockets containing copies of the 

Commonwealth of Massachusetts’

revision application, the materials 

which the EPA used in evaluating the 

revision, and materials relating to the 

State-specific and site-specific Federal 

regulation changes, have been 

established at the following two 

locations: (i) Massachusetts Department 

of Environmental Protection, Business 

Compliance Division, One Winter 

Street—8th Floor, Boston, MA 02108, 

business hours Monday through Friday 

9 a.m. to 5 p.m., tel: (617) 556–1096; 

and (ii) EPA Region I Library, One