alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR~ 

SOUTHERN DlSTRlCT OF NEW YOM __I__________________*___r*_____"_*_____--"---- 1 ..--*----r----- X 

CtWW~ J;, ZfUuf- La -1 ORIGINAL 

I 

It having been reported Court that the above tntitIed action has been 

settled, and the parties and their consented to the undersignad exercising 

jurisdiction over this case for of entering this Order of Discontinuance, it is 

hereby 

ORDERED that and hereby is, discontinued @&aut prejudice 

and weosrs; provided, that within 30 days of this dai c of the order, counsel 

for plsintiff may apply by letter or the action to the active calendar of rbe court, in 

which event the action will be restored. 

I 

DATED: N~W York, New York o&*b 1 g . zoor 1 

7 i 

FMMAAS 

States Magistrate Judge 

1 

1. I AttorneAs) for Defe dant %,, ~-f? 

%& TJ. ~L$J %?"fPZ 9SC1) 

B&kB wtU WJ Qy l EI ;re=, 

Agreed and Consented to: Agreed and Consented to; 

Case 1:07-cv-03398-BSJ Document 11 Filed 10/19/2007 Page 1 of 2
OCT-18-2007 THU 03: 59 PM BAD IAK W l LL AND RUDDY FAX NO, 12123766778 

lO/la/2a 07 15 : 13 FAX 2128056724 YUaGE WMS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WUTHERN D'LSTMm OF NEW YORK 

Plaintifqs), ORDER OF DISCONTINUANCE 

It having been repod to this C&ud that the above entilled action has been 

sstled, and the parties and their counsel having mnserlted to the undersigned exercising 

ji ~risdiclion over this case for the limited purpose of entering this Order of Discontinuance, it is 

htreby 

ORDERED that raid action bc and hereby is, discontinued &&hut prejudice 

and ~~ortr; pmvidd, bowever, that vi~hin 30 days of this date of ihc order, counsel 

€ca plaintifhay apply by letter for restoration of the ariion to the active calendar of the court, in 

which evcnr the action will be restored. 

* 

FRANK MMS 

United States Magistrate Judge 

ArromeAs) lor Dcfendanc fif %+, c.P. 

fkb 3. Zprn1;b.l a. 

Ag reed and Consenred to: Agrcd and Consented LO: 

Case 1:07-cv-03398-BSJ Document 11 Filed 10/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-3 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-3 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-3 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 3 of 3
ex10_2.htm


 


 

 

Extracted of

Office and factory building

Leasing agreement

 

Party A:                      Mr. Li Jian Jun

Party B:                      Weifang Xinsheng Food Co., Ltd


	
·  
	
Party B is agreed to lease a factory and office premise situated at Linghe industrial park, Anqiu City, Shandong province for a period of one year starting from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.





	
·  
	
Annual rental charge is RMB900,000 and is payable on December 31, 2009.





	
·  
	
Party B is responsible for all repair and maintenance of the premise;





	
·  
	
Party B is allowed to alter the structure of the building; and
Case 1:07-cv-03419-AKH Document 25 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

ii .,.>.- !. 

I i 

L,.uL, 3: . --!I 

1: -~\ +,.1-,,2 :;ii,~,s;-): ,I i;. *i 2.. -I$--~I-o~ -- \! ! ' 

--.." ~.. ^."_.I.._ --- -' 

-_, 1'- -~.. 

.. 

IN RE: Fosamax Products Liability : 

Litigation 

1: 06-md-1789 (JFK) 

Order -------------------------------.--- X 

This Document Relates to: All Actions : 

--------.-----------------------.-- X 

JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District Judge: 

The Plaintiff's Steering Committee ("PSC") has 

requested an evidentiary hearing in advance of oral argument on 

the class certification motions that are currently pending before 

the Court. For the reasons discussed below, the PSC's request is 

DENIED. 

In determining whether to certify a class, a court must 

resolve any factual disputes relevant to each requirement of 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. In re Initial Public Offerinq 

Securities Litiqation, 471 F.3d 24, 41 (2d Cir. 2006). In 

connection with the instant class certification motion, the 

parties have created and the Court has reviewed an extensive 

evidentiary record. This record consists of the expert 

affidavits of plaintiff's dental experts, Robert E. Marx, D.D.S 

and Alistair N. Goss, D.D.Sc; plaintiff's claims administration 

expert Paul Mulholland, C.P.A., C.V.A.; defendant's medical 

expert, John Bilezikian, M.D.; defendant's expert Jeri W. Nieves, 

PH.D., an epidemiologist who specializes in osteoporosis; 

Case 1:07-cv-03462-JFK Document 13 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 2
defendant's oral and maxillofacial expert Robert S. Glickman, 

D.M.D.; and defendant's chemistry expert, Paul A. Bartlett. The 

parties have also submitted excerpts from the deposition 

transcripts of several of these experts; the interrogatory 

responses, deposition transcripts and plaintiff profile forms 

("PPF's") of the three putative class representatives, Mr. Trent 

Nichols, Jr., M.D., Ms. Aline Trahan, and Ms. Greta V. Murphy; an 

August 2004 post-marketing safety review from the FDA's Office of 

Drug Safety; and an FDA report showing the number of cases in 

which doctors reported adverse drug experiences associated with 

Fosamax in 1996. The parties have also brought to the Court's 

attention over forty articles and chapters from the oral and 

maxiilofacial, medical and dental scientific literature 

discussing osteonecrosis of the jaw ("ONJ") and its causes, 

diagnosis, treatment and relationship to oral bisphosphonates 

such as Fosamax. 

This record provides a sufficient factual basis to 

determine whether plaintiffs' motlons meet Rule 23's requirements 

and an evidentiary hearing will not be necessary. Accordingly, 

the PSC's request is denied. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: &2~Ccy~ 3 / ' G(? 7 

/ 

( JOHN F. KEENAN 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03462-JFK Document 13 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER 

SITE LITIGATION 

 21MC102(AKH)

KRZYSZTOF SZCZEPANSKI (AND WIFE, ANNA 

SZCZEPANSKI), 

Plaintiff(s), 

-against100 CHURCH LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

 06CV15084(AKH)

NOTICE OF ADOPTION BY 

ZAR REALTY 

MANAGEMENT CORP. OF 

ANSWER TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant ZAR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. 

n/k/a SAPIR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. for the building located at 100 Church 

Street, (hereinafter “Zar/Sapir”) as and for its response to the allegations set forth in the 

Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) related to the Master Complaint adding new 

defendants not previously served filed in the above-referenced action, herein adopts Zar/Sapir 's 

Answer to Master Complaint dated August 1, 2007, which was filed in the matter of In re World 

Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). ZAR/SAPIR has 

filed a Master Disclosure of Interested Parties in 21 MC 102 (AKH), and as such, is exempt from 

having to file such a disclosure in this specific matter, pursuant to the provisions of Case 

Management Order No. 4 (¶ J(2)). 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT defendant, Zar/Sapir reserves its right to 

assert any defenses to which it is entitled, including but not limited to those enumerated in Case 

Management Order No. 4 (¶¶ D(1)-(5)). 

Case 1:06-cv-15084-AKH Document 9 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 1 of 3
WHEREFORE, Zar/Sapir demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned action as 

against it, together with its costs and disbursements. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 December 4, 2007 

HARRIS BEACH PLLC 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ZAR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. n/k/a 

SAPIR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. 

 /s/ 

 Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062) 

100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor 

New York, New York 10005 

(212) 687-0100 

TO: 

Paul Napoli, Esq. 

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP 

115 Broadway, 12th Floor 

New York, New York 10006 

Robert A. Grochow, Esq. 

Robert A. Grochow, P.C. 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq. 

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiff

James E. Tyrrell, Esq. 

Joseph Hopkins, Esq. 

Patton Boggs LLP 

One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

Thomas Egan, Esq. 

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP 

One Liberty Plaza 

New York, New York 10006 

Liaison Counsel for the Defendants 

All Counsel via ECF 

Case 1:06-cv-15084-AKH Document 9 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATION AS TO SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on December 4, 2007, I caused to be filed and 

served the following document electronically via the Court’s ECF system upon the parties: 

1. Notice of Zar Realty Management Corp.’s Adoption of Answer to Master 

Complaint. 

Dated: December 4, 2007 

 /s/ 

 Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062) 

Case 1:06-cv-15084-AKH Document 9 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

..................................................................... X 

IN RE: Fosamax Products Liability 

Litigation, 1:06-md-1789 (JFK) Order ----------------------.------------.-- X 

This Document Relates to: All Actions : 

...................................... x 

JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District Judge: 

Section 2(a) of the Court's practices generally 

requires a pre-motion conference before a party may make any 

motion. This requirement is hereby waived with respect to 

motions to remand filed in this multi-district litigation because 

the jurisdictional issues typically raised by such motions can be 

resolved more efficiently without a conference. Accordingly, it 

is ORDERED that plaintiffs may file motions to remand without 

first requesting a pre-motion conference. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: New York, New York 

November / 4, 2007 

\, 

JOHN F. KEENAN 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03467-JFK Document 14 Filed 11/14/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15120-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Revised 6/30/05

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On [DATE] and [DATE], we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:

DELIVERED:

	COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO.

	APPELLANT

	V.

	APPELLEE

	------------

	FROM THE COURT OF  COUNTYNO. 2-08-037   -        -CV

LiInNdDsSeEyY V. JoOhHnNsSoOnN aAnNdD AlLlL OcCcCuUpPaAnNtTsS	APPELLANT	

AND ALL OCCUPANTS

	V.

JeEaAnNnNiIeE NiIxX	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM COUNTY THE        DISTRICT COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT            COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On ___________  fEBRUARYFebruary 1, 2008 and February 13, 2008. ,  __________, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 75[or $175 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $1275 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court'’s order of Auaugusgust 28, 2007July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d)43.4..

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:   CAYXCE, C.J.; LIVINSGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DELIVERED:  February 278 March 6, 2008
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS Oklahoma Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Spangler, M.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOSE SANCHEZ , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No s . 4D 19

- 888 and 4D19

- 1220

[ November 27, 2019 ]

Consolidated a ppeal s of orders denying rule 3.850 motions from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Daliah H. Weiss , Judge; L.T. Case No. 502007CF017817LXXXMB

.
Jose Sanchez, Cross City, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J. Concepcion, Assistan t Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

W ARNER , G ERBER and C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Jay A. Herman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of Delphax Technologies Inc. (theRegistrant);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;3. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  January 25, 2006 /s/ Jay A. Herman   Jay A. Herman   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Soldier Accounted For From World War II (McCurley, B.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DON WILLIAM JACKSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 23-474

D.C. No. 2:13-cr-00531-PA-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 26, 2024**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Don William Jackson appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 60-month sentence imposed upon the fourth revocation of his 

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 23-474

Jackson contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to 

consider or address his mitigating arguments concerning his personal 

circumstances, employment and criminal history, letters of support from family 

and friends, and addiction issues. We review for plain error, see United States v. 

Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and conclude there is 

none. The record reflects that the district court considered Jackson’s mitigating 

arguments and explained that the within-Guidelines sentence was warranted in 

light of Jackson’s repeated violations and breaches of the court’s trust, his failure 

to take advantage of the support offered to him, his ongoing criminal behavior, and 

the danger he poses to himself and the public. Contrary to Jackson’s argument, 

this explanation is sufficient to allow for meaningful appellate review. See United 

States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). Moreover, Jackson 

has not shown a reasonable probability that the district court would have imposed a 

lower sentence had it more explicitly weighed Jackson’s mitigating arguments

against the aggravating circumstances it cited. See United States v. Dallman, 533 

F.3d 755, 762 (9th Cir. 2008).

AFFIRMED.
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 7 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 7 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 7 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 7 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 7 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 7 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 7 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 7 of 7