alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                                5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the contained quarterly 10-Q and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                             1
       
<S>                                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               Jul-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                                  Aug-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                    Oct-31-1997
<CASH>                                                            1,252,666
<SECURITIES>                                                      2,665,558
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       364,605
<ALLOWANCES>                                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  4,953,591
<PP&E>                                                           49,052,666
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   20,910,007
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   40,736,730
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             2,778,896
<BONDS>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                                       28,371,143
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     40,736,730
<SALES>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  2,800,861
<CGS>                                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  2,124,022
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  216,031
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     535,011
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        190,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 345,011
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        345,011
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                          0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          0.00
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Whitney Information Network, Inc. (the "Company") for
the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I, Charles M. Peck, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ CHARLES M. PECK Charles M. Peck Chief Executive OfficerMarch 31, 2009


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 10.22

RETENTION AGREEMENT

This Retention Agreement (the "Agreement") is made and entered into effective as of December , 2000, by
and between  (the "Director") and NetRatings, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company").

R E C I T A L

In order to provide the Director with enhanced financial security and sufficient encouragement to remain with the Company, the Board of Directors of the
Company (the "Board") believes that it is imperative to provide the Director with certain benefits upon the involuntary termination of the Director's services as a board member of the Company provided
that such termination was not for cause.

A G R E E M E N T

In consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and the continued service of the Director to the Company, the parties agree as follows:

1.Benefits upon removal from Board.



1

---



2.Definition of Terms.The following terms referred to in this Agreement shall have the following
meanings:



Disability.  "Disability" shall mean the inability of the Director to perform his duties as a member of the Board as the result of his
incapacity due to physical or mental illness, and such inability, at least 26 weeks after its commencement, is determined to be total and permanent by a physician selected by the Company or its
insurers and reasonably acceptable to the Director (or the Director's legal representative).

2

---

3.Other Activities.



4.Successors.



5.Notices.Notices and all other communications contemplated by this Agreement shall be in writing and
shall be deemed to have been duly given when personally delivered or when mailed by U.S. registered or certified mail, return receipt requested and postage prepaid. In the case of the Director, mailed
notices shall be addressed to him at the home address which he most recently communicated to the Company in writing. In the case of the Company, mailed notices shall be addressed to its corporate
headquarters, and all notices shall be directed to the attention of its Secretary.

6.Miscellaneous Provisions.



3

---



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Agreement, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the day and year first above written.

|COMPANY:  |  | NETRATINGS, INC.
|--------- |  | ----------------
|          |  | By:             
|          |  |                 
|          |  | Title:          
|          |  |                 
|EMPLOYEE: |  | [DIRECTOR NAME] 
|          |  |                 
|          |  |                 

4

---

QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6052

HEZEKIAH BERNARD DRAYTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-03-3554)

Submitted: March 10, 2005 Decided: March 15, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hezekiah Bernard Drayton, Appellant Pro Se. William Kenneth

Witherspoon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

To the extent that Drayton seeks to appeal the district

court’s May 12, 2004 order, his notice of appeal is untimely.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Hezekiah B. Drayton appeals from the district court’s

order denying his second motion for leave to file a petition for a

certificate of appealability out of time. The district court

previously denied relief on Drayton’s motion filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (2000) and granted Drayton’s first motion for a thirty-day

extension in which to note an appeal or request a certificate of

appealability. 

The time in which to note an appeal is mandatory and

jurisdictional. See Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S. 257,

264 (1978) (stating the appeal periods established by Rule 4 are

mandatory and jurisdictional). Drayton had sixty days in which to

note an appeal from the district court’s order entered on May 12,

2004, and the court granted an extension of an additional thirty

days. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B). Drayton did not note an

appeal or request a certificate of appealability within that time

period.* Moreover, his second request for an extension of time in

November 2004 was made outside the time permitted under Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(5)(A). Accordingly, the district court did not err in

denying Drayton an additional extension, and we affirm the district

court’s order. Drayton v. United States, CA-03-3554 (D.S.C. Dec.

2, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
- 3 -

legal materials are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5619 

To amend the SAFE Port Act to provide for the eligibility of certain third 

party logistics providers for participation in the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2010 

Mr. OWENS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend the SAFE Port Act to provide for the eligibility 

of certain third party logistics providers for participation 

in the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism 

program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN THIRD PARTY LOGIS4 TICS PROVIDERS FOR PARTICIPATION IN C– 

5 TPAT PROGRAM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 212 of the SAFE Port 

7 Act (Public Law 109–347; 6 U.S.C. 962) is amended by 

8 inserting after ‘‘contract logistics providers,’’ the folVerDate Mar 15 2010 22:03 Jun 29, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5619.IH H5619

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5619 IH

1 lowing: ‘‘non-asset based third party logistics providers 

2 that arrange international transportation of freight, in3 cluding motor carrier brokers of property licensed by the 

4 Department of Transportation,’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by 

7 subsection (a) takes effect on the date of the enact8 ment of this Act and applies with respect to appli9 cants seeking to participate in the Customs–Trade 

10 Partnership Against Terrorism (‘‘C–TPAT’’) pro11 gram on or after the date on which the regulations 

12 published pursuant to paragraph (2) take effect. 

13 (2) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of Home14 land Security, acting through the Commissioner re15 sponsible for United States Customs and Border 

16 Protection of the Department of Homeland Security, 

17 shall publish in the Federal Register criteria for par18 ticipation in C–TPAT program of non-asset based 

19 third party logistics providers described in section 

20 212 of the SAFE Port Act, as added by subsection 

21 (a), not later than 60 days after the date of the en22 actment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1719

DEBRA L. RIPPEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN H. DALTON, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge; W. Curtis Sewell, Magistrate Judge. (CA-98-1441-A) Submitted: August 5, 1999 Decided: August 10, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Debra L. Rippey, Appellant Pro Se. Rachel Celia Ballow, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on March 23, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on March 24, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Debra L. Rippey appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Appellee and dismissing her employmentdiscrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Rippey v. Dalton , No. CA-98-1441-A (E.D. Va. Mar. 24, 1999). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         319,325
<SECURITIES>                                    12,931
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (397)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               335,691
<PP&E>                                           1,478
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (562)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 336,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,273
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            32
<OTHER-SE>                                     328,229
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   336,799
<SALES>                                          3,040
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,040
<CGS>                                            6,923
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,923
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,536
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   372
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 181
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,866)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,866)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,866)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (5.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.01)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.7

                                  CERTIFICATION

                          Chase Credit Card Owner Trust
                           Series 1999-3 (the "Trust")

I, Patricia M. Garvey, a vice president in charge of the reports of the
servicing function of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association for the
above-referenced Trust, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of the
         Trust;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
         pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement, for inclusion in
         these reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
         under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon
         my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under the
         pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement, and except as
         disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
         under the pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement; and

5.       These reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
         the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
         conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
         Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
         pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement, that is included
         in this annual report.





Date:    March 30, 2004


         /s/ Patricia M. Garvey
-------------------------------
Name:    Patricia M. Garvey
Title:   Vice President
Company: Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 10, 2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00829-CV

IOMNIS SURVEILLANCE SOLUTIONS, LLC AKA AND DBA IOMNIS 

SURVEILLANCE SOLUTIONS, AND IOMNIS SURVEILLANCE AND 

LOULA P. GATOURA, Appellants 

V.

NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Appellee 

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 4 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 1092072-101 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appellants have not paid the filing fee of $205.00. On October 25, 2018, we 

issued an order stating we would dismiss the appeal if appellants did not pay the 

filing fee by November 5, 2018. The fee was not paid. However, appellants paid for 

the clerk’s record, suggesting appellants intended to prosecute this appeal. For that 

reason, on November 27, 2018, we again issued an order stating we would dismiss 

the appeal if appellants did not pay the filing fee by December 7, 2018. We cautioned 
2

that if appellants did not timely pay the filing fee, the appeal would be dismissed. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 5. The filing fee has not been paid, and appellants have not 

asserted that they are excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 

from paying the filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5; Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 51.207. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing 

involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice 

from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time). 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Bourliot.
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 1 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 2 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 3 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 4 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 5 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 6 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 7 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 8 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 9 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 10 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 11 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 12 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 13 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 14 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 15 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 16 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 17 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 18 of 18
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Marine Accounted For From World War II (Gillen, J.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT