alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extract from the
PrimeEnergy Corporation second quarter 1999 Form 10QSB, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to that document.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            2288
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4056
<ALLOWANCES>                                       127
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 10689
<PP&E>                                           51831
<DEPRECIATION>                                   31873
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   31594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            10001
<BONDS>                                          18500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           761
<OTHER-SE>                                        2314<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     31594
<SALES>                                           4471
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 11436
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    11273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 656
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (479)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (31)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (448)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (448)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.10)<FN>


<F1>Retained Earnings	 					(1169)
<F1>Treasury Stock								  (7419)
<F1>Paid In Capital								 10902

</FN>


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 10-14 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 10-14 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 10-14 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 10-14 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 10-14 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 10-14 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 10-14 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 10-14 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 10-14 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 9 of 9
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10362 Conference Calendar

THURMAN CHANDLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus LEE HANEY, Honorable; FRANK GRIFFIN; JOHN DOE; RICHARD ROE; WILLIAM ZOE; LESLIE VAUGHN, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:95-CV-80-C

- - - - - - - - - - August 21, 1996 Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Thurman Chandler, prisoner #668780, appeals the district court's dismissal as frivolous of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Brown County, Texas, District Attorney Lee Haney; assistant district attorneys, Frank Griffin and three unnamed persons; and retained counsel Leslie Vaughn. Chandler alleged that the defendants conspired to cause him to lose in aNo. 96-10362 - 2 - forfeiture proceeding $16,339 seized as property gained from the commission of a felony. We have examined Chandler's arguments and the record and affirm the district court’s decision on the grounds that Chandler’s conclusional allegations of a conspiracy are insufficient to state a claim under § 1983. See Mills v. Criminal Dist. Court No. 3 , 837 F.2d 677, 679 (5th Cir. 1988)(conclusional allegations of conspiracy without a sufficient factual basis will not support a claim of conspiracy). We do not reach the question of absolute immunity addressed by the district
court.
AFFIRMED.
Case 7:07-cv-03332-CLB-MDF Document 10 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. HARMON

No. 101 PC.

Case below: 21 N.C. App. 508.

Petition by defendant *in propria persona*for writ of certi-orari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 June 1974. Petition by counsel for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 July 1974.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00344-CV

Shawn Hizey, Appellant

v.

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee for Rali 2007 QS2, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY,

NO. 13-0180-CC4, HONORABLE JOHN MCMASTER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal stating that appellant no

longer wishes to pursue his appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App.

P. 42.1(a)(1).

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Rose, and Goodwin

Dismissed on Joint Motion

Filed: July 30, 2013
#### STATE v. WATTS

No. 148 PC.

Case below: 38 N.C. App. 561.

Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 January 1979.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 3, 2013

d0826 

# Order

Clerk September 3, 2013

147096

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147096

COA: 308410

Wayne CC: 11

- 009139

- 01

- FC

DERRICK BERNARD WESTBROOK,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 14, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### RAFTERY v. CONSTRUCTION CO.

No. 202 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 495.

Petition by defendant Clark Equipment Co. for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 14 July 1976.
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 12-5 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 1 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 12-5 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 2 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 12-5 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 3 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 12-5 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 4 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 12-5 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 5 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 12-5 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 6 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 12-5 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 7 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 12-5 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 8 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 12-5 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 9 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 12-5 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 10 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 12-5 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 11 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 12-5 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 12 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 12-5 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 13 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 12-5 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 14 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 12-5 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 15 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 12-5 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 16 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 12-5 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 17 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 12-5 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 18 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 12-5 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 19 of 19
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner 

v.

MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER GALLO,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2365 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 121 DB 2017

Attorney Registration No. 206972

(Fayette County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of November, 2018, upon consideration of the Report 

and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board, Michael Christopher Gallo is disbarred 

from the bar of this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with the provisions of 

Pa.R.D.E. 217. Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to 

Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
EXHIBIT 8.1

           Significant Subsidiaries of 02 MICRO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

0//2//Micro, Inc., a California corporation

0//2//Micro Electronics, Inc., a Taiwan company

0//2//Micro International Japan Limited, a Japanese company

0//2//Micro PTE Limited-Singapore, a Singapore company

Aotu Micro (Wuhan) Co., Ltd., a Chinese company

0//2//Micro (Beijing) Co., Ltd., a Chinese company

0//2//Micro (China) Co., Ltd., a Chinese company

0//2//Micro (Chengdu) Co., Ltd., a Chinese company

OceanOne Semiconductor (Ningbo) Limited, a Chinese company
#### BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION v. NEIL E. BROWN and wife, INGRID S. BROWN

No. 77

(Filed 29 December 1978)

On petition for further review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 of the Court of Appeals’ decision, 34 N.C. App. 266, 237 S.E. 2d 854 (1977), which found error in the trial before *Ervin, J.,*at the 20 July 1976 Session of BUNCOMBE Superior Court and awarded a new trial. This case was argued as No. 26 at the Spring Term 1978.

*Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General, by James B. Richmond, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State.*

*Lentz & Ball, P.A., by Ervin L. Ball, Jr., and Long, McClure & Dodd, by Robert B. Long, Jr., Attorneys for defendants.*

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined the Court of Appeals’ opinion by Clark, J., and the briefs and authorities on the points in question. We find the result reached by the Court of Appeals, its reasoning, and the legal principles enunciated by it to be altogether correct. Its decision is, therefore,

Affirmed.

Justice BRITT took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Case 7:07-cv-03456-KMK-MDF Document 4 Filed 05/10/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15124-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. WILLIS

No. 115 PC.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 43.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 9 January 1974. ’
Case 7:07-cv-03395-KMK-LMS Document 13 Filed 01/25/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 7:07-cv-03395-KMK-LMS Document 13 Filed 01/25/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03470-NRB Document 4 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03470-NRB Document 4 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03419-AKH Document 4 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03419-AKH Document 4 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### Hattie E. Buck v. Pacific Loan and Homestead Association of Illinois.

1. Fobmer *Case—Follows Conservative Building & Loan Association v. Cady, 55 Ill. App. 469.*

Memorandum..—Appeal from, the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. W. G. Ewing, Judge, presiding.

*543Chas. E. Reeve, attorney for appellant.

A. W. Martin, attorney for appellee.

Mr. J ustioe Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case involves no principle hot discussed in Conservative Building and Loan Association v. Cady, 55 Ill. App. 469, and it is therefore affirmed. Mechanics, etc., Ass’n v. Gilligan, No. 5337 this term. Affirmed.

Shepard, J., dissents.
#### KLEIN v. INSURANCE CO.

No. 22 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 452.

. Petition for writ of; certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 25 August 1975.
ex19f-bmoamendmentno3tos






Exhibit 10.19(f) CERTAIN INFORMATION, IDENTIFIED BY [*****], HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM  THE EXHIBIT BECAUSE IT IS BOTH NOT MATERIAL AND IS THE TYPE THAT  THE REGISTRANT TREATS AS PRIVATE OR CONFIDENTIAL. AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO SERVICING AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO SERVICING AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is  made as of December 7, 2021 (the “Effective Date”) by and between GreenSky, LLC, a Georgia  limited liability company (“Servicer”), and BMO Harris Bank N.A., a national banking  association (“Lender”).  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall  have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Servicing Agreement (as defined herein). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Lender and Servicer have previously entered into that certain Servicing  Agreement dated as of November 5, 2018, as amended (the “Servicing Agreement”);  WHEREAS, Lender and Servicer desire to amend the Servicing Agreement as set forth  herein;  NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of  which are hereby acknowledged, Lender and Servicer hereby agree as follows: 1. Effective December 7, 2021, the Servicing Agreement is hereby amended as  follows: a. Section 3.01(d)(v) of the Servicing Agreement is hereby amended to delete  subpart (A) of the definition of “[*****]” in its entirety and the following is substituted in lieu  thereof: “[*****]”  b. Schedule C of the Servicing Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and  Schedule C attached hereto is substituted in lieu thereof. 2. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Servicing Agreement shall remain in  full force and effect. 3. This Amendment may be executed and delivered by Lender and Servicer in  facsimile or PDF format and in any number of separate counterparts, all of which, when  delivered, shall together constitute one and the same document. [Signature page follows] 





 






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first  above written. SERVICER: GREENSKY, LLC By: /s/ Timothy D. Kaliban Name: Timothy Kaliban Title: President LENDER: BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. By: /s/ Mark Shulman Name: Mark Shulman Title: Head Consumer Lending & Chief CRA Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
PrimeEnergy Corporation third quarter 2000 Form 10QSB, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to that document.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   		 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            1599
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5430
<ALLOWANCES>                                       207
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 11049
<PP&E>                                           62053
<DEPRECIATION>                                   41180
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   32450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            10454
<BONDS>                                          17768
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           761
<OTHER-SE>                                        3471<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     32450
<SALES>                                          15971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 27632
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    21776
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4709
<INCOME-TAX>                                       565
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4144
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4144
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.83

<FN>
<F1>Retained Earnings	 	                      		 (1009)
<F1>Treasury Stock				                           (8031)
<F1>Paid In Capital				                          10902
</FN>



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 13.2


         CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER SECTION 906 OF
                            THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Chartered Semiconductor
Manufacturing Ltd. (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge
that:

     (i)  the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the
year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated : March 1, 2006

                               /s/ George Thomas
                               -----------------
                               George Thomas
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for the purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference to any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1833 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1833

  To transfer a bridge over the Wabash River to the New Harmony River 
Bridge Authority and the New Harmony and Wabash River Bridge Authority, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 2019

   Mr. Braun (for himself, Mr. Young, Ms. Duckworth, and Mr. Durbin) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To transfer a bridge over the Wabash River to the New Harmony River 
Bridge Authority and the New Harmony and Wabash River Bridge Authority, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restore the Harmony Way Bridge 
Act''.

SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF BRIDGE AND LAND.

    Notwithstanding any provision of the Act of April 12, 1941 (55 
Stat. 140, chapter 71), not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the White County Bridge Commission shall convey, 
without consideration, to the New Harmony River Bridge Authority and 
the New Harmony and Wabash River Bridge Authority, any and all right, 
title, and interest of the Commission in and to the bridge across the 
Wabash River at or near New Harmony, Indiana, the approaches to the 
bridge, and the land underneath or adjacent to the bridge and the 
approaches to the bridge.

SEC. 3. REPEAL.

    The Act of April 12, 1941 (55 Stat. 140, chapter 71), is repealed 
effective on the date that the White County Bridge Commission completes 
the conveyance described in section 2.
                                 <all>
```
#### SAWYER v. SAWYER

No. 95 PC.

Case below: 21 N.C. App. 293.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 June 1974.
Case 7:07-cr-00374-CLB Document 24 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cr-00374-CLB Document 24 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

ii .,.>.- !. 

I i 

L,.uL, 3: . --!I 

1: -~\ +,.1-,,2 :;ii,~,s;-): ,I i;. *i 2.. -I$--~I-o~ -- \! ! ' 

--.." ~.. ^."_.I.._ --- -' 

-_, 1'- -~.. 

.. 

IN RE: Fosamax Products Liability : 

Litigation 

1: 06-md-1789 (JFK) 

Order -------------------------------.--- X 

This Document Relates to: All Actions : 

--------.-----------------------.-- X 

JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District Judge: 

The Plaintiff's Steering Committee ("PSC") has 

requested an evidentiary hearing in advance of oral argument on 

the class certification motions that are currently pending before 

the Court. For the reasons discussed below, the PSC's request is 

DENIED. 

In determining whether to certify a class, a court must 

resolve any factual disputes relevant to each requirement of 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. In re Initial Public Offerinq 

Securities Litiqation, 471 F.3d 24, 41 (2d Cir. 2006). In 

connection with the instant class certification motion, the 

parties have created and the Court has reviewed an extensive 

evidentiary record. This record consists of the expert 

affidavits of plaintiff's dental experts, Robert E. Marx, D.D.S 

and Alistair N. Goss, D.D.Sc; plaintiff's claims administration 

expert Paul Mulholland, C.P.A., C.V.A.; defendant's medical 

expert, John Bilezikian, M.D.; defendant's expert Jeri W. Nieves, 

PH.D., an epidemiologist who specializes in osteoporosis; 

Case 1:07-cv-03464-JFK Document 13 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 2
defendant's oral and maxillofacial expert Robert S. Glickman, 

D.M.D.; and defendant's chemistry expert, Paul A. Bartlett. The 

parties have also submitted excerpts from the deposition 

transcripts of several of these experts; the interrogatory 

responses, deposition transcripts and plaintiff profile forms 

("PPF's") of the three putative class representatives, Mr. Trent 

Nichols, Jr., M.D., Ms. Aline Trahan, and Ms. Greta V. Murphy; an 

August 2004 post-marketing safety review from the FDA's Office of 

Drug Safety; and an FDA report showing the number of cases in 

which doctors reported adverse drug experiences associated with 

Fosamax in 1996. The parties have also brought to the Court's 

attention over forty articles and chapters from the oral and 

maxiilofacial, medical and dental scientific literature 

discussing osteonecrosis of the jaw ("ONJ") and its causes, 

diagnosis, treatment and relationship to oral bisphosphonates 

such as Fosamax. 

This record provides a sufficient factual basis to 

determine whether plaintiffs' motlons meet Rule 23's requirements 

and an evidentiary hearing will not be necessary. Accordingly, 

the PSC's request is denied. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: &2~Ccy~ 3 / ' G(? 7 

/ 

( JOHN F. KEENAN 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03464-JFK Document 13 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03329-HB Document 10 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03329-HB Document 10 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 2 of 2