alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC 10Q and
is qualified in its intirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,982,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,424,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,540,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,603,000
<PP&E>                                       6,711,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,372,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,361,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,592,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,372,000
<SALES>                                     16,831,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,831,000
<CGS>                                       15,317,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,746,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 90,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    55,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
#### WOOD v. WOOD

No. 39 PC.

No. 118 (Fall Term).

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 570.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 4 October 1978.
#### JOHNSON v. HOOKS

No. 136 PC.

Case below: 21 N.C. App. 585.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 30 August 1974.
Case 1:06-cv-15129-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### McLEAN v. SALE

No. 181 PC.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 538.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 3 March 1982. Cross petition by plaintiff for writ of certiorari on the issue of punitive damage denied 3 March 1982.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Katy Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending April 1, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David J. Feldman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ David J. Feldman


David J. Feldman


Chief Executive Officer


May 16, 2011











The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany this report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15


                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP






To Jacobson Stores Inc.:

We are aware that Jacobson Stores Inc. has incorporated by reference in its Form
S-8 Registration Statements File Nos. 033-53469, 333-31989 and 333-59031 and
Form S-2 File No. 33-10532 its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 3, 2001,
which includes our report dated November 14, 2001, covering the unaudited
interim condensed consolidated financial information contained therein. Pursuant
to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a
part of the registration statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report
prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the
Act.


                                                     Very truly yours,



                                                     /s/  Arthur Andersen LLP
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Detroit, Michigan
December 18, 2001
#### STATE v. JEFFUS

No. 18 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 501.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 April 1979. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 April 1979.
#### STATE v. PETERS

No. 109PC

Case below: 50 NC App 746

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 May 1981.
#### STATE v. ALLEN

No. 74.

Case below: 16 N.C. App. 159.

Motion of defendant to dismiss appeal of State for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 1 November 1972.
United States District Court

Southern District of New York

Broadcast Music, Inc. et al. ) Case No.: 07 CV 3507

Plaintiff ) AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

v.

299 Restaurant, Inc. et al.

Defendants

STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF NEW YORK ss:

I, MARVIN COHEN, being duly sworn deposes and says deponent is not a party to this action and is over the age of eighteen years

and resides in the state of NEW YORK. That on JUNE 07, 2007 at 8:47 AM at 425 MONTEREY AyE, PELHAM, NY 10803,

deponent served the within SUMMONS IN A CIVIL CASE, COMPLAINT and JUDGES RULES on STEVEN JULIANO therein

named (the intended recipient).

SUITABLE AGE PERSON: By delivering a true copy of each to NICOLE JULIANO, the DAUGHTER of STEVEN JULIANO,

a person of suitable age and discretion. Said premises is intended recipient's residence within the state.

On 6/8/2007 deponent also enclosed a copy of same in a postpaid sealed wrapper marked "personal and confidential" properly

addressed to the above intended recipient at 425 MONTEREY AyE, PELHAM, NY 10803 and deposited said wrapper in a official

depository under exclusive care and custody of the United States Postal Service within NEW YORK State.

DESCRIPTION: Deponent further states that the description of the person actually served is as follows:

Gender: Female Race/Skin: White Hair: Black Glasses: No Approx. Age: 25 Height: 5'2" Weight: 110

COMMENTS: Recipient represented to me that she is authorized to accept service of process on behalf of Steven Juliano.

I declare under penalties of perjury that the

informa

contained herS is the

besify

knowledge.

arge esearch LLC ExecUted on:

20 Vesey Street, PH

New York, NY 10007

(212)227-9600

Su1cite4and swi to bere me, a notary public, on this J. day of t — , 2007. . / My Commission Expires: , /

NiY'Public

cflSTlNA OSULLVAN

OTARY PUB STATE OF NE OPK

O. O1OS6I68

New Yotk OouY uaIfed fl MaCh 26 1imS$0fl Exp

Case 1:07-cv-03507-PAC Document 3-3 Filed 06/22/2007 Page 1 of 1
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 5, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00237

- CR

Flanzo Lafonte TOWNES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009CR0764

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On July 2, 2018, appellant filed a motion alleging the appellate record is incomplete.

Specifically, appellant refers to the attachments to the Petition for Writ of Mandamu s appellant

filed on November 17, 2014. The attachments, which are referred to in the petition, are not

included in the clerk’s record. We therefore ORDER the trial court clerk to supplement the

appellate record in this appeal on or before July 15, 2018 with the attachments to the Petition

for Writ of Mandamus filed on November 17, 2014, which is included in the clerk’s record at

pages 168 through 171.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my h and and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 5th day of July, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### IN RE COLLINS v. B & G PIE CO.

No. 672P82.

Case below: 59 N.C. App. 341.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 11 January 1983.
Case 1:07-cv-03248-JFK Document 17 Filed 1112012007 Page 1 of 3 

2 13 1 Magnolia Avenue 

Birmingham, AL 35205 

(205) 328-2200 L ' ... ;I 

... ,. . , . . . 

A//or.iiey for. Plniii~iflBroi~iiie Lee . . . , . . :. .~.-. ~! . . ., ,.< c '~ 

. . c. . _ . . , .. ,~. ...... ... . . 

-. , . ?' ., LWTED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~. *, .- .......... __ . i ... SOUTHERN DISTFUCT OF NEW YORK ! 

..... ... ...... .. ... 

IN RE: Fosamax Products 1 

Liability Litigation 

2 

1 

T11i.s Document Relates To: 1 

MDL NO. 1789 

1:06-MD-1789 (mK) 

Bronnie Lee 

1:07-CV-03248-JFK 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION 

FILED ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFF BRONNIE LEE 

PURSUANT TO FED. R CN. P. 25(a)(l) 

The Personal Representatives of Bronnie Lee move the Court to substitute them 

as the Plaintiffs in this civil action as follows: 

I. Bronnie Lce passed away on June 7,2007. A Suggestion of Death and 

accompanying documents were filed onNovember 20,2007. 

2. Under North Carolina law, the claim of Bronnie Lee survives to her 

Personal Representatives. N.C. Gen. Stat. 5 28.4-1 8-1 

3. Mrs. Lee did not leave a Will. Mrs. Lee's children, Rayford Yates Lee, Jr. 

aud Walter Michael Lee, were appointed as co- administrators of Mrs. Lee's estate by the 

State of NOI-th Carolina in tile General Court of Justice Superior Court Division. A copy 

of the Letters of Administration are attached to the Declaration of Annesley H. DeGaris 

filed with this Court on November 20, 2007. 

Case 1:07-cv-03248-JFK Document 20 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1 :07-cv-03248-JFK Document 17 Filed 1112012007 Page 2 of 3 

4. The Personal Representatives request tile Court to grant this motion and 

alloiv their substitution, in place and instead of Bromie Lee and further allow for the 

amendment oithe Complaint to state a claim for wrongiul death. 

5. This motion is not opposed by the Defendant. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

- lsl 

Ah'NESLEY 1-1. DEGARIS 

CORY WATSON CROWDER & 

DEGAFUS, P.C. 

2131 Magnolia .4venue, STE 200 

Birmingham, AL 35205 

Telephone: 205-328-2200 

Facsimile: 205-324-7896 

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS 

Having been advised by plaintiff's 

counsel that defendant does not oppose 

the motion, the motion is granted. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: New York, N.Y. 

December 4, 2007 

Case 1:07-cv-03248-JFK Document 20 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<MULTIPLIER>                         1
       
<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                                JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                  DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                        3,135,745
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 2,028,721
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   2,240,913
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              7,595,117
<PP&E>                                                        3,185,786
<DEPRECIATION>                                                2,850,950
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                7,929,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         1,143,359
<BONDS>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                      242,756
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    6,543,839
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  7,929,954
<SALES>                                                       7,115,109
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              7,115,109
<CGS>                                                         5,907,002
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 5,907,002
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               1,276,542
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  510,497
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  766,045
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.37
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cr-00477-LBS Document 14 Filed 05/19/2008 Page 1 of 1
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO . A

- 0776

- 17T3

SUJIN YOO,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

NAIYA J. PATEL and

BOROUGH O F FAIRVIEW,

Defendants

- Respondents.

______________________________

Submitted September 24, 2018

– Decided

Before Judges Messano and Fasciale.

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law

Division, Bergen County, Docket No. L

- 0 764

- 16.

Jae Lee Law, PC, attorneys for appellant (Shane A.

Sullivan, of counsel and on the briefs).

Keenan & Doris, LLC, attorneys for respondents

(Joanne M. Venino, of counsel and on the brief).

PER CURIAM NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the

internet

, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36

- 3.

December 18, 20182 A

- 0776

- 17T3

The matter having been amicably adjusted and the parties having

stip ulated to the dismissal of this appeal, it is hereby ordered that the appeal is

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dismissed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 7, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-11196 Summary Calendar

ELLEN M. ORTIZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:99-CV-212

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ellen M. Ortiz appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Ortiz contends that she is entitled to relief because (1) the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) should have found her disabled under § 1.05 of the Listing of Impairments, 20 C.F.R. Pt. 404, Subpt. P., App. 1; (2) the vocational expert (VE) committed perjury at her 1998No. 02-11196 -2- administrative hearing; (3) the ALJ’s hypothetical question to the VE did not include all of her proven impairments; and (4) the VE failed to identify a significant number of jobs in the economy which she could perform. We AFFIRM, essentially for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s report, which the district court adopted.
See Ortiz v. Barnhart , No. 2:99-CV-0212 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 20, 2002).
AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

JOHN E. ANDRUS MEMORIAL, INC. (d/b/a ANDRUS ON 

HUDSON),

Plaintiff,

-againstRICHARD F. DAINES, as Commissioner of the New York 

State Department of Health,

Defendant.

2007 Civ. 3432 (CLB)(MDF)

AFFIDAVIT OF BRIAN T. 

McGOVERN IN 

OPPOSITION TO 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT

STATE OF NEW YORK )

: ss.:

COUNTY OF NEW YORK )

BRIAN T. McGOVERN, being duly sworn, deposes and says:

1. I am a member of the bar of this Court and am employed by Cadwalader, 

Wickersham & Taft LLP, attorneys for the plaintiff John E. Andrus Memorial, Inc. d/b/a Andrus 

on Hudson (the “Andrus”) in this action.

2. The purpose of this affidavit is to place before the Court true copies of the 

following documents, submitted in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment:

(a) Annexed as Exhibit A is a true copy of Defendant’s Responses and 

Objections to Plaintiff’s First Request for Production of Documents and Interrogatories dated 

July 2, 2007 and served on July 2, 2007;

(b) Annexed as Exhibit B is a true copy of a letter from David Sandman of the 

Commission on Health Care Facilities in the 21st Century to Dan Heim of the New York 

Association of Homes and Services for the Aging dated March 17, 2006 with attachment, 

Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 17 Filed 08/13/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

bearing bates stamp numbers “AND 0615” through “AND 0619”, and produced by defendant in 

response to Plaintiff’s First Request for Production of Documents and Interrogatories on July 2, 

2007; 

(c) Annexed as Exhibit C is a true copy of the Complaint of St. Joseph 

Hospital of Cheektowaga filed in the action entitled St. Joseph Hospital of Cheektowaga v.

Antonia Novello, New York State Supreme Court, Erie County Index No. 11568/06; and

(d) Annexed as Exhibit D is a true copy of the order of Judge Orazio

Bellantoni in the action entitled Community Hospital at Dobbs Ferry v. Antonia Novello, New 

York State Supreme Court, Westchester County Index No. 24650/06, dated July 10, 2007. 

WHEREFORE, I respectfully request that the Court deny defendant’s motion for 

summary judgment.

s/Brian T. McGovern

Brian T. McGovern

Sworn to before me this

13th day of August, 2007.

______________________________________

Notary Public

Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 17 Filed 08/13/2007 Page 2 of 2
J

- S64037

- 18

NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

DALLAS RAY VAVRA

Appellant : : : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 3918 EDA 2017 Appeal from the Order November 3, 2017 In the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County Criminal Division

at No(s): CP

- 48

- CR

- 0000809

- 2011

BEFORE: BOWES, J., OLSON, J., and KUNSELMAN, J.
CONCURRING STATEMENT BY OLSON, J.: FILED DECEMBER 20 , 2018 I agree with the learned majority that the serial petition filed by Appellant under the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) was properly denied by the PCRA court. I write separately as I do not believe that this Court should
consid er the most recent appeal. Pursuant to a Judgment Order filed by this
Court on June 18, 2015 in another appeal filed by Appellant involving Appellant’s judgment of sentence at trial court docket number CP

- 48

- CR

0000809

- 2011 , Appellant is prohibited “ from submitting any additional filings for relief in this case without prior permission from this Court .”
Commonwealth v

. Vavra , 2015 WL 6957472 (Pa. Super. 2015), unpublished judgment order, at 3 (emphasis in original). As Appellant failed to obtain the requ isite prior approval from this Court to file this appeal, we should summarily dismiss the appeal.
#### STATE v. BELL

No. 89 PC

Case below: 48 NC App 356

Petition by defendant for further review denied 2 December 1980. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 2 December 1980.
EXHIBIT 8.1
 
 
 Significant Subsidiaries of O2MICRO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
 
 O2Micro, Inc., a California corporation
 O2Micro Electronics, Inc., a Taiwan company
 O2Micro International Japan Limited, a Japanese company
 O2Micro PTE Limited-Singapore, a Singapore company
 O2Micro (Wuhan) Co., Ltd., a Chinese company
 O2Micro (Beijing) Co., Ltd., a Chinese company
 O2Micro (China) Co., Ltd., a Chinese company
 O2Micro (Chengdu) Co., Ltd., a Chinese company
 International Asset Holding Company, a Cayman Islands company
 O2Security (Wuhan) Limited, a Chinese company
USDS SDNY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

ELECTRONICAUY 

SOUTHERN DISTRJCT OF NEW YORK ........................................................... x DATE FILED: - d4 -O 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

07 CR 363 (PKC) 

-againstORDER 

CHEREESE STEVENS, 

Defendant. 

........................................................... X 

P. KEVM CASTEL, U.S.D.J. 

Upon the application of defense counsel, the conference previously scheduled 

for July 27,2007 is adjourned until September 11,2007 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 12C. 1 find 

that the ends of justice will be served by granting a continuance and that taking such action 

outweighs the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. My reasons for this 

finding are that the grant of the continuance is needed because of the impending departure of 

counsel who is assigned the case and entry of new counsel. Accordingly, the time between 

today and September 11,2007 is excluded. 

SO ORDERED. 

Y 

, 

P. Kevin Castel 

United States District Judge 

Dated: New York, New York 

July 24,2007 

Case 1:07-cr-00363-PKC Document 8 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03433-TPG Document 11-3 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03433-TPG Document 11-3 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. MONTIETH

No. 153 PC.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 498.

■ Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 February 1975.