alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       UT
<CIK> 0000861388
<NAME> LG&E ENERGY CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                    PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                         3,133,963
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         180,958
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                              665,170
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                            112,238
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4,092,329
<COMMON>                                            772,617 <F1>
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                (4)<F2>
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                 690,883
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                    1,463,496
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                         135,328
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                              1,193,209
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  187,900
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                            0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                            21
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                 0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                               0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                          0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                    1,112,375
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                     4,092,329
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                         1,162,684
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                 78,558
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                          873,693 <F3>
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                          952,251
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                             210,433
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   17,636 <F4>
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                      228,069 <F4>
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             65,401
<NET-INCOME>                                        162,668
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           5,130
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                       157,538
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                            104,651
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            58,354
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                              276,667
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          1.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          1.22
<FN>
<F1>Includes common stock expense of $1,852.
<F2>Represents unrealized loss on marketable securities,
    net of taxes.
<F3>Includes equity in earnings of affiliates of
    $11,960.
<F4>Includes income from discontinued operations
    of $7,910, net of income taxes.
<F5>The Company restated this schedule to reflect
    its merger with KU Energy Corporation and to
    reclassify discontinued operations.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-15082-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
William J. Smith (WJS-9137) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE: WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

DAVID REYNOLDS (AND WIFE, KATHERINE 

REYNOLDS) 

NOTICE OE THE 

BROOKFIELD 

V. PARTIES' ADOPTION OF 

AMENDED ANSWER 

TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT 

ALAN KASMAN DBA KASCO, ET. AL., 

CASE NUMBER: (AKH) 

07 CV 3446 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendants Brookfield Financial Properties, 

Inc., Brookfield Financial Properties, L.P., Brookfield Properties One WFC Co. LLC 

f/k/a WFP Tower A Co. L.P., Brookfield Properties One WFC G.P. Corp. f/k/a WFP 

Tower A Co. GP Corp., WFP Tower B Co L.P., WFP Tower B Co. GP Corp., BFP 

Tower C Co. LLC, BFP Tower C MM LLC, and WFP Retail Co. L.P. (collectively the 

"Brookfield Parties"), as and for their responses to the allegations set forth in the 

Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master Complaint filed in 

the above referenced action, hereby adopt the Brookfield Parties' Amended Answer to 

Master Complaint, dated October 16, 2007, which was filed in the matter of~n re World 

Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 

WHEREFORE, the Brookfield Parties demand judgment dismissing the above 

captioned action as against each ofthem, together with their cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 26 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York 

October IS 2007 

Faust, Goetz, Schenker & Blee, LLP 

B~p~ Wil~am J~Smithl(gd~ 37) 

rney for the Brookfield Parties 

Tvko R Street, 20fh Floor 

New~drk. NY 10006 

(212) 363-6900 

Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 26 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03413-LAP Document 21 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03413-LAP Document 21 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-12 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-12 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. HAWKINS

No. 651P82.

Case below: 59 N.C. App. 190.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 11 January 1983.
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 2-3 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 2-3 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 2-3 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### STATE v. CHAVIS

No. 240 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 75.

• Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 October 1976.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 222 (Friday, November 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 69937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22925]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1417]


Expansion/Reorganization of FTZ 147, Reading, Pennsylvania, Area

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zone Corporation of Southeastern 
Pennsylvania, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 147, submitted an 
application to the Board for authority to reorganize and expand FTZ 147 
to modify existing Sites 4 and 5 and to include nine additional sites 
in south eastern and south central Pennsylvania, adjacent to the 
Harrisburg Customs port of entry (FTZ Docket 12-2005; filed 3/1/05);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (70 FR 11611, 3/9/05), and the application has been processed 
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand/reorganize FTZ 147 is approved, subject 
to the Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, and 
subject to the 2,000-acre activation limit.
    Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of November 2005.

Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
Dennis Puccinelli,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-22925 Filed 11-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 34-13 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 34-13 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Annual Report of Workstream Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-K/A for the year  ending  May 31,  2003,  as filed with the  Securities
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Mullarkey, the
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                             /s/ Michael Mullarkey
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Michael Mullarkey
                                             Chief Executive Officer



                                             Date: September 26, 2003


<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Annual Report of Workstream Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-K/A for the year  ending  May 31,  2003,  as filed with the  Securities
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David Polansky,  the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                                  /s/ David Polansky
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  David Polansky
                                                  Chief Financial Officer



                                                  Date: September 26, 2003

                                       2
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH     Document 32      Filed 04/22/2008     Page 1 of 1
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-4 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-4 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-4 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-4 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-4 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-4 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 6 of 6
#### STATE v. WOODWARD

No. 158 PC.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 679.

. Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 25 August 1975.
Case 1:06-cv-15157-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03429-DCF Document 3 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 1 of 1
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 5, 2018

No. 04-18-00237-CR

Flanzo Lafonte TOWNES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009CR0764

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On July 2, 2018, appellant filed a motion alleging the appellate record is incomplete.

Specifically, appellant refers to the attachments to the Petition for Writ of Mandamus appellant 

filed on November 17, 2014. The attachments, which are referred to in the petition, are not 

included in the clerk’s record. We therefore ORDER the trial court clerk to supplement the 

appellate record in this appeal on or before July 15, 2018 with the attachments to the Petition 

for Writ of Mandamus filed on November 17, 2014, which is included in the clerk’s record at 

pages 168 through 171.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of July, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
_____________ No. 95-3714EA

_____________ William Lloyd White, also known * as Lloyd Nelson White, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: June 28, 1996 Filed: July 9, 1996

_____________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. William Lloyd White appeals the district court's denial of his motion for return of propert y and currency. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(e). Having carefullyreviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude th e judgment of the distr ict court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BEGNOVE VASQUEZ

- GARCIA,

Petitioner,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 12

- 73258 Agency No. A089

- 853

- 916

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted May 24, 2016 ** Before: REINHARDT, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges. Begnove Vasquez

- Garcia , a native and citizen of El Salvador , petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denyin g his application for asylum, withholding of removal , and protection under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 31 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 12

- 73258

(“CAT”). We have jurisdict ion under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th Cir. 2006), and we deny the petition for review. Vasquez

- Garcia does not challenge the agency’s dispositive deter mination that his asylum application was time

- barred. See Martinez

- Serrano v. INS , 94 F.3d 1256, 1259

- 60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are deemed waived). Thus, we deny his petition for review
as to his asylum claim, including his humanitarian asylum claim. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Vasquez

Garcia’s experiences in El Salvador did not rise to the level of persecution. See Gu v. Gonzales , 454 F.3d 1014, 1019

- 21 (9th Ci r. 2006 ) ; see also Prasad v. INS , 47 F.3d 336, 340 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Although a reasonable factfinder could have found this incident sufficient to establish past persecution, we do not believe that a factfinder would be compelled to do so

. ”) (emphasis in o riginal). Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s determination that Vasquez

- Garcia failed to demonstrate it is more likely than not that he will be persecuted in El Salvador. See Nagoulko v. INS , 333 F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th Cir. 2003) (possibility of future persecution too speculative); Hoxha v. Ashcroft , 319 F.3d 1179, 1185 (9th Cir.3 12

- 73258

2003 ) (to qualify for withholding of removal, petitioner must show that it is more probable than not that he would s uffer future persecution ). Thus, Vasquez

Garcia’s withholding of removal claim fail s . Finally, substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s denial of Vasquez

Garcia’s CAT claim because he failed to show it is more likely than not tha t he will be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of El Salvador. See Silaya v. Mukasey , 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir. 2008).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
**Exhibit      21.1**

**LIST      OF SUBSIDIARIES**

| 1. | GuildMaster,                Inc., a Missouri corporation, doing business under the name                "GuildMaster". |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Faith                Walk Designs, Inc., a Missouri corporation, doing business under                the names                "Faith Walk" and "Faith Walk                Designs". |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | WestWay                Enterprises, Ltd., a Hong Kong corporation, doing business under                the                name”WestWay”. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | P.T.                Niaga Merapi, an Indonesian corporation, doing business under the                name”Merapi”. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 20 of 20
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

NOVA MUD, INC.,

 Appellant,

v.

SANDRA H. STALEY, Individually, As 

Independent Executrix of THE ESTATE 

OF GEORGE G. STALEY, Deceased, and 

as Trustee of the TAX FREE TRUST FOR 

SANDRA H. STALEY,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

§

No. 08-17-00147-CV

Appeal from the

109th District Court

of Winkler County, Texas

(TC# 15,683-B)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment and all 

costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for 

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Rodriguez, J., Palafox, J., and Larsen, Senior Judge

Larsen, Senior Judge (Sitting by Assignment)
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 6-3 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 6-3 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 6-3 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 6-3 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 31, 2016

NO. 03-14-00594-CV

Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas, Appellant

v.

Texas Department of State Health Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

REVERSED AND RENDERED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on August 28, 2014. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in 

the district court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court reverses the district court’s judgment and 

renders judgment that the public information at issue in this case is not confidential under 

Government Code Section 531.1021. The appellee shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both 

in this Court and the court below.
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 66-4 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 66-4 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### LEONARD v. JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORP.

No. 697PA82.

Case below: 59 N.C. App. 454.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 8 March 1983.
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 2 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 3 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 4 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 5 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 6 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 7 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 8 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 9 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 10 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 11 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 12 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 13 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 14 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 15 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 16 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 17 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 18 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 19 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 20 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 21 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 16-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 22 of 22