alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PATTI L. HENRY DISTRICT CLERK



### 5/24/2018 POST OFFICE BOX NN ANAHUAC, TX 77514 TELEPHONE: 409-267-2432 FAX: 409-267-8209 e-mail: districtclerk@chamberstx.gov



### NOTICE OF APPEAL ASSIGNMENT OF COURT
TO: First Court ofAppeals 10th Floor 1307 San Jacinto Houston, Texas 77002 FROM: Patti L. 

### Henry, District Clerk, Chambers County, Texas RE: Cause No. 18876 THE STATE OF TEXAS Vs Pascal Dewayne Garriott DATE OF JUDGMENT 05/23/2018 NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED: 05/23/2018 The above case was assigned to your Court on the 24th day of May A. 

### D. 2018, by the Clerk ofthe District Court ofChambers County, Texas.

# ~~ PATTI L. 

### HENRY, DISTRICT CLERK CHAMBERS COUNTY, TEXAS P. 0. DRAWERNN ANAHUAC, TEXAS 77514 

### CC: Tom Abbate Attorney for Defendant on Appeal 2323 South Voss, Ste. 560 Houston, Texas 77057 Dane Listi Assistant District Attorney Hand DeliveredFiled 5/23/2018 4:51 PM Patti L. Henry District Clerk Chambers County, Texas ~""""1>9'42::r----'-F~~~"'l. Deputy CAUSE NO. 18876 STATE OF TEXAS V. PASCAL DEWAYNE GARRIOT § § § § § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF 253RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT CHAMBERS COUNTY, TEXAS NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Now comes PASCAL DEWAYNE GARRIOTT, Applicant, in the above styled and numbered cause, and gives this written notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals of the State of Texas from the judgment herein rendered against Applicant.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

This is to certify that service ofthe forgoing docu record as required by EMAIL on MAY 23, 2018.

## APPENDIX: CIRTIPICATION 

# orDEFENDANT'S RIGHT OP 

## APPEAL NO. \ 

# <o <o**~** 

## (.:. TBS STATE O'f

### TBXAS 

## vs. {I-S t-AJ;

# 0e:'-Y~ 1'1E 

# G'~t::-IZ..+:Q:S:S:

DBPIOO>ANT TRIAL C01JllT'8 CD.'l'D'IC4TION OP 

### DJt1'&NlWl'MI IIIGRl' 10

### AfflAL**~** o 

### I. JqD

### oltlll 

### 1dal oaart.
....

## dda crimiDIJ ae: 

# V ilaapln1*piaaa11mdilt8d 

### t :leatla111edpttoappeal.« ilapl11

# ..-.-.1R1t.-..... niled~wdllamodaafDlclm4111Wca 

### belllelllllnat...._..m--.111141119clth•••blatmdptof.a,plll,or 

# ii.,.. bccpbloae.

### battllldlloe.tllu pm.14ml\llbtto 

### appellm1119 d C tws 11111betlptof.applll. er 

### iiaplai 

### llllpin-.

# a 

# tlla_., khllNOlfabtofappell,«



## ..

T-,hn'Nmnl,er.~-~--~~--~ Ti ,.,.._.Mamba: ( :2 '61)**~** 0~ - 

### t, '7611 Bmailarldrea:
__________ _ 

### Bmlileddlml: /),1.~t:1~,,.,e,~p,vl·.!z 4 

## ;..f-11d 4?~

RS atlwOat~ls• 17,2011 I 

### ! 

# \ '
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000055373
<NAME> KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      671,984
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      6,439
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          64,217
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        10,783
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  88,992
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 842,415
<COMMON>                                        50,450
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      108,750
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             86,531
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 245,731
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           293,234
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              15,250
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  43,900
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      9,756
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 3,107
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 231,437
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  842,415
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       88,580
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             5,459
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      67,881
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      73,340
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         15,240
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                (141)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  15,099
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         5,968
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,131
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    9,131
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         6,690
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        3,509
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          15,148
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> All common stock owned by parent company; no EPS required.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00636

- CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

v. CYNTHIA D. CLARK

On Appeal from the 329th District Court of Wharton County , Texas

Trial Cause No. CV49332

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consider ed this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment
den ying Clark's petition for expunction . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 2, 2018
#### STATE v. MINOR

No. 34 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 85.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 3 February 1976.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20505 Summary Calendar

DANTE D’AGOSTINO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus PATERSON, Sergeant; D. MERRELL, DR.; JOHN DOE, #1, DR.; JOHN DOE, #2, DR.; CHANNEY, DR., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 96-CV-3826

- - - - - - - - - - June 9, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Dante D’Agostino, Texas prisoner # 688309, appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). He argues that the defendant prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. We have reviewed the record and D’Agostino’s brief, and we conclude that the district court abused its discretion by dismissing the complaint as frivolous as to two defendants. See Payne v. Lynaugh , 843 F.2d 177, 178 (5thNo. 98-20505 -2-

** Spears v. McCotter , 776 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985). Cir. 1988). D’Agostino’s allegations at the Spears ** hearing present a nonfrivolous claim of interference with prescribed medical care under the Eighth Amendment which, with further factual development, "may pass section 1915[e] muster." See Eason v. Thaler , 14 F.3d 8, 10 (5th Cir. 1994). D’Agostino’s testimony was that: 1) at least two physicians in the prison system prescribed a back brace for D’Agostino and that one of them, Dr. Thompson (defendant Dr. John Doe #1), conditioned the prescription on approval from nonmedical security personnel; 2) that Sergeant Patterson confiscated his prescribed back brace even though it contained no metal and even after D’Agostino showed him the prescription for it written by Dr. Thompson; and 3) that if the back brace did not contain metal, it was not a security threat. Any reliance on other evidence at the Spears hearing to counter D’Agostino’s testimony was error. See Wilson v. Barrientos , 926 F.2d 480, 483 (5th Cir. 1991). The facts to which D’Agostino testified are not irrational or wholly incredible, so they are not frivolous. See Denton v. Hernandez , 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992). Accordingly, the district court’s dismissal of the complaint as frivolous is VACATED as to defendants Patterson and Thompson, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED as to the remaining defendants. AFFIRMED in part; VACATED AND REMANDED in part.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 227 (Monday, November 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 71333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23320]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium, 
Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 31, 2005, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Network Centric Operations 
Industry Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Cubic Defense Applications, Inc., San 
Diego, CA; DCN, Paris, France; Association for Enterprise Integration, 
Arlington, VA; LynuxWorks, Inc., San Jose, CA; Instrumentointi Oy, 
Tampere, Finland; and OrderOne Networks, Orangeville, Ontario, Canada 
have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Bay Microsystems, 
Inc., Santa Clara, CA; Parametric Technology, Corporation, Needham, MA; 
and McDonald Bradley, Inc., Herndon VA have withdrawn as parties to 
this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Network Centric Operations Industry 
Consortium, Inc. intends to file additional written notification 
disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 19, 2004, Network Centric Operations Industry 
Consortium, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the 
Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 2, 
2005 (70 FR 5486).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 5, 
2005. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on August 26, 2005 (70 FR 50407).

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 05-23320 Filed 11-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 6707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2350]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel Special Emphasis Panel or Review of R25 Applications.
    Date: March 30-31, 2005.
    Time: 6 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Wyndham City Center Hotel, 1143 New Hampshire Ave., NW., 
Washington, DC 20037.
    Contact Person: David E. Maslow, PhD, Chief, Resources and 
Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National 
Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive 
Boulevard--Room 8117, Bethesda, MD 20892-7405, (301) 496-2330.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 2, 2005.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-2350 Filed 2-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Alithos Anesti, LLC ) ASBCA No. 63882

)

Under Contract No. W911RX-24-P-0009 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Aron C. Beezley, Esq.

 Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

 Washington, DC

Alex G. Thrasher, Esq.

 Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

 Birmingham, AL

Sarah S. Osborne, Esq.

 Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

 Huntsville, AL

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Dana J. Chase, Esq.

 Army Chief Trial Attorney

MAJ Heather M. Martin, JA

LTC Julie A. Glascott, JA

 Trial Attorneys

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The appeal has been withdrawn. Accordingly, it is dismissed from the Board’s 

docket with prejudice.

Dated: May 14, 2024

JOHN J. THRASHER 

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals
2

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63882, Appeal of Alithos Anesti, 

LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: May 14, 2024

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
EXHIBIT 10.7





SERVICES AGREEMENT



BETWEEN:



FAOUZI ZERROUK, an individual resident in the city of Richmond, British Columbia (the Advisor)



and



GLOBAL PRECISION MEDICAL INC. a corporation having a place of business at #536  1489 Marine Drive, West Vancouver, British Columbia V7T 1B8 (the Company)





WHEREAS the Company holds the right to use a technology known as the Uro-Stent which originates from Russia;



WHEREAS the Advisor possesses specialized technical know-how pertaining to the Uro-Stent and to the Russian market;



WHEREAS the Company wishes to retain the services of the Advisor as a member of its Scientific Advisory Board to advise on all matters pertaining to the further development, enhancement and manufacturing of the Uro-Stent as well as on matters pertaining to the Russian market;



WHEREAS the Advisor is prepared to become a member of the Companys Scientific Advisory Board for this purpose.



IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING, THE PARTIES AGREE:



1.

The Advisor shall become a member of the Companys Scientific Advisory Board and shall, in this capacity, provide advice from time to time (as requested) on the further development, enhancement and manufacturing of the Uro-Stent as well as on various matters pertaining to the Russian market. For this purpose, this advice shall be rendered during the meetings of the Board of Directors of the Company and occasionally outside such meetings.



2.

In consideration for the Advisors services in this respect, he shall receive share options representing the right for him to subscribe to 125,000 shares of the Companys capital stock at a price of US $0.40 per share, exercisable at the time and in accordance with terms established by the Board of Directors of the Company. In addition, the Advisor shall be reimbursed for any out of pocket costs (such as travel costs) incurred at the request of the Company.



3.

For greater certainty, it is provided that the time required from the Advisor shall be consistent with the time requirements from the members of the Board of Directors of the Company. In the event that the Advisor is required to devote significantly more time to his functions, the Advisor and the Company shall agree on appropriate additional consideration.



4.

This Agreement is not assignable by the Advisor.



5.

If this Agreement is terminated without cause by the Company, the Advisor shall be entitled to keep his share option rights.



6.

This Agreement is governed by the laws of British Columbia.



SIGNED this 14th day of April 2004





/s/ Faouzi Zerrouk__________________

Faouzi Zerrouk







GLOBAL PRECISION MEDICAL INC.







/s/ Lindsay Semple________________

Per: Lindsay Semple
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 232 (Monday, December 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 72468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23611]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993; ASTM international--Standards

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 16, 2005, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ASTM International--
Standards (``ASTM'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
additions or changes to its standards development activities. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ASTM has provided 
an updated list of current, ongoing ASTM standards activities 
originating between July 2005 and November 2005, designated as Work 
Items. A complete listing of ASTM Work Items, along with a brief 
description of each, is available at http://www.astm.org.
    On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65226).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 4, 
2005. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on August 26, 2005 (70 FR 50406).
    For additional information, please contact: Thomas B. O'Brien, Jr., 
General Counsel, at ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West 
Conshohocken, PA 19428, telephone 610-832-9597, e-mail address 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#691d060b1b000c0729081a1d0447061b0e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95e1faf7e7fcf0fbd5f4e6e1f8bbfae7f2">[email protected]</span></a>.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 05-23611 Filed 12-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### COMBS v. PETERS

No. 35 PC.

Case below: 53 N.C. App. 630.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 November 1981. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 3 November 1981.
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 1 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 2 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 3 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 4 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 5 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 6 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 7 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 8 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 9 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 10 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 11 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 12 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 13 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 14 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 15 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 16 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 17 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 18 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 19 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 20 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 21 of 22
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-5 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 22 of 22
EXHIBIT 31.2

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Thomas
Madden, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of PFSweb, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this report;



|      |  |                        
|----- |  | -----------------------
|Date: |  | April 30, 2015         
|      | 
|By:   |  | /s/ THOMAS J. MADDEN   
|      |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE v. HIGGINS

No. 115 PC.

Case below: 16 N.C. App. 581.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 January 1973. Appeal dismissed for lack of substantial constitutional question 2 January 1973.