alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Koss Corporation (the "Company") for the
quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Koss, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                     /s/ Michael J. Koss
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Michael J. Koss
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     Date: November 7, 2003
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 15 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 15 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 15 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 15 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 15 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 15 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 6 of 6
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

EDWARD L. DOMES, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 252 WAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 27th day of October, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135003 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices
V SC: 135003 COA: 267945 Kent CC: 04-012450-FC SHAWN WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 21, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007

Clerk
**CL** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 2 - 0 5 29 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. JASSIE LAYDELL WESTERMAN ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including March 2 1 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the State’s response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 12 2024

02/12/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0529
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 1997, and the Consolidated Statement
of Income for the period ending September 30, 1997, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           75800
<SECURITIES>                                       100
<RECEIVABLES>                                   296800
<ALLOWANCES>                                      5300
<INVENTORY>                                     161800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                591500
<PP&E>                                         4525200
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2557800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2958200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           459500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         54100
<OTHER-SE>                                     1358500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2958200
<SALES>                                        1281900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1281900
<CGS>                                           729400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1148200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (78800)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               33100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 212500
<INCOME-TAX>                                     63900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             148600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    148600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
The Chase Manhattan Bank
One Chase Manhattan Plaza
New York, NY  10081






                               April 30, 1997





Mr. Ronald L. Krutzman
Treasurer
Laclede Gas Company
720 Olive Street
St. Louis, MO  63101

Dear Ron:

The Chase Manhattan Bank (the "Bank") is pleased to advise you that it is
prepared to offer a line of credit to Laclede Gas Company (the "Company") up
to the maximum amount of $15,000,000.  The Bank will consider requests for
advances under the line of credit until June 30, 1997.  The purpose of the
line of credit is general corporate purposes.  Accordingly, our officers
may, at their discretion, make short term loans to the Company on such terms
as may be mutually agreed upon from time to time.

Notes issued under this arrangement shall mature not more than sixty days
(60) from date of issuance.  Interest shall be payable at maturity or on the
date of any prepayment.  Notes issued under this arrangement may be prepaid
at any time without penalty.

We ask that you continue to supply us with current financial and other
information, which current information will be furnished to the Bank as it
may from time to time reasonably request.

It is understood that any loans obtained by any subsidiary of the Company
whether or not they are guaranteed by the Company are excluded from this
arrangement and shall not be charged against the credit stated above.

Nothing in this letter is intended to alter the arrangement set forth in the
agreement dated January 17, 1997 or the availability of up to $10,000,000 of
advances thereunder from the Bank on the terms set forth in said January 17,
1997 Agreement.

 Please acknowledge your understanding of the above by signing and returning
the attached copy of this letter by April 30, 1997.

                               The Chase Manhattan Bank




                                 Page 40<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                               s/Paul V. Farrell
                               Paul V. Farrell
                               Vice President

Acknowledged:
Laclede Gas Company


By: s/Ronald L. Krutzman  4/30/97

Name: Ronald L. Krutzman
Title: Treasurer













































                                 Page 41
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.19 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
136289 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 136289 COA: 275508 Kent CC: 05-012514-FC JACINTO PENA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 13, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0721 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 29, 2008

Clerk
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-40177

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Kelvin Montgomery, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:22-CR-5-1

______________________________

Before Willett, Duncan, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Kelvin Montgomery has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Montgomery has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 22, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-40177 Document: 00517039388 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/22/2024
No. 23-40177

2

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-40177 Document: 00517039388 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/22/2024
Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC     Document 16      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 1 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC     Document 16      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 2 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC     Document 16      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 3 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC     Document 16      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 4 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC     Document 16      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 5 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC     Document 16      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 6 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC     Document 16      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 7 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC     Document 16      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 8 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC     Document 16      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 9 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC     Document 16      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 10 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC     Document 16      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 11 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC     Document 16      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 12 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC     Document 16      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 13 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC     Document 16      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 14 of 14
#### STATE v. STARR

No. 52 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 398.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 April 1979.
CoorsTek, Inc. And Subsidiaries
                         -------------------------------
                                  Of Registrant
                                  -------------

     The following table lists subsidiaries of the Registrant and the respective
jurisdictions  of their  incorporation as of December 31, 1999. All subsidiaries
are included in Registrant's consolidated financial statements.

        State/Country of
             Name                                                  Incorporation
--------------------------------------                             -------------
CoorsTek, Inc.                                                       Delaware
   Alumina Ceramics, Inc.                                            Arkansas
   Coors Ceramicon Designs, Ltd., dba
     Coors Tetrafluor, Inc.                                          Colorado
   Coors Ceramics Company Limited                                    Scotland
   CoorsTek GmbH                                                     Germany
   Coors Technical Ceramics Company                                  Tennessee
   Coors Wear Products, Inc.                                         Colorado
   Wilbanks International, Inc.                                      Oregon
   Edwards Enterprises                                               California
   CoorsTek Korea Co., Ltd.                                          Korea


                                       50
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 3 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 4 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 5 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 6 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 7 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 8 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 9 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 10 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 11 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 12 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 13 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 14 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 15 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 16 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 17 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 18 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 19 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 20 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 21 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 22 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 23 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 24 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 25 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 26 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 27 of 28
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-37 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 28 of 28
SIMMONS, JANNACE & STAGG, L.L.P. 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, N.A. 

75 Jackson Avenue 

Syosset, New York 11791 

(516) 357-8100 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

DANIEL KURZ, 

Plaintiff,

- against - 

CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A., 

Defendant. 

 Docket No. 

 03 Civ. 5678 (WCC) 

 NOTICE OF 

 CHANGE OF ADDRESS

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that as of April 18, 2005, Simmons, Jannace 

& Stagg, L.L.P., counsel for Defendant CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, 

N.A., has a new address: 

 75 Jackson Avenue 

 Syosset, New York 11791 

 The telephone and fax numbers are unchanged. 

Dated: East Meadow, New York 

 April 13, 2005 

 Simmons, Jannace & Stagg, L.L.P. 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A. 

 By: s/ Andrew Kazin 

 Andrew Kazin (ak-9932) 

TO: 

Daniel Kurz 

Plaintiff Pro Se 

11 Dover Terrace 

Monsey, New York 10952 

Case 7:03-cv-05678-WCC Document 20 Filed 04/13/2005 Page 1 of 2
-2-

Clerk of the Court 

United States District Court 

Southern District of New York 

300 Quarropas Street 

White Plains, New York 10601 

not address chg ecf

Case 7:03-cv-05678-WCC Document 20 Filed 04/13/2005 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. CRANDALL

No. 54.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 625.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 February 1975.
Specimen Common Stock Certificate



 Exhibit 4.1 
 

 
 NUMBER CHELSEA THERAPEUTICS SHARES cusIp 163428 10 5 see reverse for certaIn defInItIons Chelsea
TherapeuTiCs inTernaTional, lTd. Incorporated under the Laws of the state of deLaware 60,000,000 shares authorIzed This Certifies That is the owner of Fully Paid and Non-Assessable Shares of Common Stock, Par Value $0.0001 Per Share, of Chelsea
TherapeuTiCs inTernaTional, lTd. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate and the shares represented hereby are
issued and shall be subject to all the provisions of the Articles of Incorporation, to all of which the holder by acceptance hereby assents. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed in facsimile by its duly
authorized officers and the facsimile seal of the Corporation to be duly affixed hereto. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. Dated: Countersigned: Corporate stock Transfer, inC. 3200 Cherry Creek
south drive, suite 430 denver, Co 80209 By Transfer Agent and Registrar Authorized Officer 1750 President UTICS INT A P E ER R PO NA E OR RA T H C TE I T O A N E A L S L, E T L H . D C DELAWAR E chief financial officer 







 

 
 Chelsea TherapeuTiCs inTernaTional, lTd. CORPORATE STOCK TRANSFER, INC. TRANSFER FEE: AS
REQUIRED The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM - as tenants in common TEN ENT - as
tenants by the entireties UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - Custodian JT TEN - as joint tenants with right (Cust) (Minor) of survivorship and not as under Uniform Gifts to Minors tenants in common Act Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the
above list. (State) PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE FOR VALUE RECEIVED, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto PLEASE PRINTOR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CO DE OF ASSIGNEE Shares of the Common
Stock represented by the within Certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated:20, Signature: X
Signature(s) Guaranteed: Signature: X THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. THE SIGNATURE(S)
SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions) WITH MEMBERSHIPIN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
1 ... T h i s pr oce edi n g a r i s es ou t of Cau s e N o. 2009- CR
- 6326 , s t y l ed T h e S t a t e o

f T e x a s v . J o s e p h u s D uncan , p end i ng i n t he 2 2 7 t h Jud i ci al D i st ri ct C o urt , B exar C o unt y , T exas , t he H o no rable P hi l i p K azen p res i d i ng. i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 9- 00 71 0- CR IN RE Jose phus DUNCA N Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Kar en Ang elini , J ustice

Rebec ca Simmons , J ustice Marialy n Ba rnar d , J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: November 11, 2009 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DEN I ED Relator Josephus Duncan ha s filed a pr o se petit ion for wr it of mandamus, see king to c ompel the trial cour

t to rule on his pro s e “Motion i n L imine - Enhanc ement Counts,” “Motion for Qu anti tativ e Wei g ht A na ly sis ,” and “ Mo tio n to Se t A sid e Ind ic tme nt. ” Ho we ve r, Dunc an is
re pr e se nte d b y

re ta ine d c ouns e l in

the c ri min a l pr oc e e din gpe nd ingin t he tr ia l c ourt

fo r wh ic h h e is
curr ently confine d. A cr im inal defe ndant is not entitled to hy brid repr esentation. See R obinson v. Sta te , 240 S.W .3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). A trial court has no leg al duty to r ule on a pro se motion filed with reg ard to a cr i m i n al proceedingin which the def endant is re prese nted by04
- 09
- 00 71 0- CR

- 2- counsel. Id. Consequently , the trial court did not abuse its discr etion by decliningto rule on re lator’s pr o s e mot ion s that re late dir e c tly to h is c on fi ne me nt b a se d o n th e c ri min a l pr oc e e din g pe nd ingin the trial cour

t. Accor dingly , relator’s petition for wr it of mandamus is denied. T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(a)
.
PER C URI AM DO NO T PU B L I SH
#### AMDAR, INC. v. SATTERWHITE

No. 45 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 410.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 1978.
#### STATE v. PUGH

No. 8 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 534.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 25 August 1975.