alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                                   PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Steven D. Goldby, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Symyx Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Symyx Technologies, Inc.

                                       By: /s/ Steven D. Goldby
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Steven D. Goldby
                                           Chairman of the Board,
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           March 8, 2004

     I, Jeryl L. Hilleman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Symyx Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Symyx Technologies, Inc.

                                       By: /s/ Jeryl L. Hilleman
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Jeryl L. Hilleman
                                           Senior Vice President,
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           March 8, 2004

                                       1
#### STATE v. JACKSON

No. 142 PC.

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 126.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 14 July 1978.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PrimeEnergy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles E. Drimal Jr., Chief Executive Officer of PrimeEnergy Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Charles E. Drimal, Jr.                    
|Charles E. Drimal, Jr. Chief
Executive Officer
|August 16, 2010
#### STATE v. HILL

No. 17 PC.

Case below: 9 N.C. App. 279.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 5 October 1970.
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-27 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-27 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-27 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                             265
<SECURITIES>                                        51
<RECEIVABLES>                                      483
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,263
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,534
<PP&E>                                           7,962
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,497
<BONDS>                                          1,839
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              980
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           488
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,891
<SALES>                                          7,263
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,263
<CGS>                                            5,637
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  98
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     37
<INCOME-TAX>                                        11
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 14
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        14
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. SANDERS

No. 188 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 284.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 August 1977.
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 3 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 4 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 5 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 6 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 7 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 8 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 9 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 10 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 11 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 12 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 13 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 14 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 15 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 16 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 17 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 18 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 19 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 20 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-15 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 21 of 21
**EXHIBIT32**

 

            Harry Lee WaterfieldII and Raymond L. Carr, being the President and Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer, respectively, of Kentucky Investors, Inc., hereby certify as of this 24thday of September, 2008, that the Form 10-Q/A for the Quarter ended June 30, 2008fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Kentucky Investors, Inc.

 

 

|   | **KENTUCKY			INVESTORS, INC.** 
  
BY:  /s/Harry			Lee Waterfield II 
Harry Lee			Waterfield II
DATE:			September 24, 2008
President 
  
			BY:  /s/Raymond L. Carr 
Raymond L.			Carr
DATE:			September 24, 2008
Vice President			- Chief Financial Officer
 

  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6780

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. FRANCISCO REZA, a/k/a Frankie, a/k/a Pancho , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:14

- cr
- 00185

- LMB

- 1 )

Submitted : September 18, 2018 Decided: September 21, 2018

Before WILKINSON and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Francisco Reza, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Francisco Reza appeals the district court ’s order denying his second motion for
sentence reduction

. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Reza , No. 1:14

- cr
- 00185

- LMB

- 1 (E.D. Va. June 19, 2018)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

* Although a district court lacks authority to reconsider its ruling on a n 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (201 2 ) motion, United States v. Goodwyn , 596 F.3d 233, 235

- 36 (4th Cir. 2010), “this prohibition [is] non

- jurisdictional, and thus waived when the government fail[s] to assert it below,” United States v. May , 855 F.3d 271, 274 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 138 S. Ct. 252 (2017).
#### INDUSTRIES, INC. v. RAILWAY CO.

No. 135 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 331.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 February 1976.
#### STATE v. MOORE

No. 192 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 193.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied'25 August 1975.
November 10 , 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

SEAN MICHAEL WHEEL ER , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00275

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
, Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal of a judgment in favor of appell ee, The State of Texas, signed February 19, 2015, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this app eal be paid by appellant, Sean Michael Wheeler. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Amend. #5 to Employee Stock Purchase Plan



 Exhibit 10.11.5 
 AMENDMENT NO. 5 
 TO 
 AMERICREDIT CORP. 
 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 
 Effective on May 15, 2009, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of AmeriCredit Corp. (the “ESP Plan”) is hereby amended as follows:

 Paragraph 2. Definitions. Sub-section (l), “Offering Period,” is hereby deleted and the following definition is
substituted in lieu thereof: 
 (l) “Offering Period” shall mean the twelve (12) months during which an option
granted pursuant to the Plan may be exercised, as described in paragraph 4. 
 Paragraph 3. Eligibility. Sub-section (b)(ii) is hereby
deleted and the following sub-section is substituted in lieu thereof: 
 (ii) Such option would permit such Employee’s
right to purchase stock under all employee stock purchase plans (described in Section 423 of the Code) of the Company and its Subsidiaries to accrue at a rate which exceeds Six Thousand Dollars ($6,000) of the fair market value of such stock
(determined at the time such option is granted) for each calendar year in which such option is outstanding at any time, in accordance with the provisions of Code Section 423(b)(8), subject to the limitations specified in Paragraph 6(a) hereof.

 Paragraph 4. Offering Periods. The last sentence of Paragraph 4 is hereby deleted and the following sentence is substituted in lieu
thereof: 
 Absent action by the Board, each Offering Period shall be for a period of twelve (12) months and new Offering
Periods shall commence on the Monday immediately following the completion of the first payroll period ending in December and June of each year. 
 Paragraph 6. Payroll Deductions. Sub-section (a) is hereby deleted and the following sub-section is substituted in lieu thereof: 
 (a) At the time a Participant files his or her Subscription Agreement, such Participant shall elect to have payroll deductions made on each pay date during the Offering Period at the rate not to exceed ten percent
(10%) of the Compensation which he or she receives on each pay date during the Offering Period, provided that the aggregate amount of such payroll deductions shall not exceed the lesser amount of (i) ten percent (10%) of the
Participant’s aggregate Compensation during said Offering Period, or (ii) $5,100 in any twelve (12) month period. An eligible Employee may participate in only one Offering Period at a time. An employee that reaches the maximum payroll
deduction in first Exercise Period of an Offering Period shall not be eligible to further participate until that Offering Period expires. 







 This Amendment No. 5 to the ESP Plan is executed and effective this 15th day of May, 2009, pursuant
to approval and authorization by the Board of Directors. 
  

	
	
	
	  
	 J. Michael May, Executive Vice President,
 Chief Legal
Officer and Secretary
#### AVIS v. INSURANCE CO.

No. 110 PC.

Case below: 16 N.C. App. 588.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 18 January 1973.
#### UTILITIES COMM. v. AMERICAN COURIER CORP.

No. 121 PC.

Case below: 8 N.C. App. 367.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 28 August 1970.
**Exhibit 15.13**

 

DeGolyer and MacNaughton

5001 Spring ValleyRoad

Suite 800 East

Dallas, Texas 75244

 

**Consent of DeGolyer and MacNaughton**

 

We consent to the referenceto our firm in the form and context in which it appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of CNOOC Limited, for the year endedDecember 31, 2015, herein, and to the incorporation by reference in any related Prospectus Supplements of CNOOC Limited for theregistration of debt securities and guarantees previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

/s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughton

 

DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON

Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716

 

Dallas, Texas 

March 31, 2016
#### STATE v. DAIL

No. 174 PC.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 552.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 25 August 1975.
Amendment to the Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT TO THE MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD. 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 1995 STOCK OPTION PLAN 

 The Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended effective
June 10, 2009, as follows: 
 1. The first sentence of Section 3 of the Plan is amended to provide in its entirety as follows:

 Subject to Section 14, Shares that may be issued with respect to Awards granted under the Plan shall not exceed an aggregate of
60,260,394 Shares of Common Stock; provided however, that on the first business day of each fiscal year starting January 31, 2010 or after, and continuing until the earlier of January 31, 2013 or termination of the Plan, there shall be
added to this Plan the lesser of an additional (i) 40,000,000 shares of Common Stock, or (ii) 5.0% of the outstanding shares of capital stock on such date, or (iii) an amount determined by the Board (provided that the amount approved
by the Board shall not be greater than (i) or (ii)).
EXHIBIT 31.1 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, William A. Shumaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kewaunee ScientificCorporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c)disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 16, 2004 

 

/s/ William A. Shumaker

William A. Shumaker

President

and Chief Executive Officer
Case 1:07-cv-03387-LBS Document 1 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03387-LBS Document 1 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03387-LBS Document 1 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71804-71805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23484]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by December 
30, 2005.
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: Department of Defense Standard tender 
of Freight Services; SDDC Form 364-R; OMB Control Number 0704-0261.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 434.
    Responses Per Respondent: 50 (average).
    Annual Responses: 21,563.
    Average Burden Per Response: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 5,391.
    Needs and Uses: The information derived from the DoD tenders on 
file with the Military surface Deployment and Distribution Command 
(SDDC) is used by SDDC subordinate commands and DoD shippers to select 
the best value carriers to transport surface freight shipments. Freight 
carriers furnish information in a uniform format so that the Government 
can determine the cost of transportation, accessorial, and security 
services, and select the best value carriers for 1.1 million Bill of 
Lading shipments annually. The DoD tender rate and other pertinent 
tender data are noted on the Bill of Lading at the time of shipment. 
The DoD tender is the source document for the General Services 
Administration post-shipment audit of carrier freight bills.
    Affected Public: Not-for-profit institutions.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Hillary Jaffe.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Jaffe at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777

[[Page 71805]]

North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 22209-2133.

    Dated: November 22, 2005.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 05-23484 Filed 11-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M