alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(LOGO)ARTHUR ANDERSEN

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.:

We  have  examined  management's  assertion  about  SUNTRUST  MORTGAGE,   INC.'S
compliance  with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Banks ("USAP") and that the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and
omissions policy in the amounts of $100,000,000  and $28,500,000,  respectively,
as of and for the year ended  December  31, 1999,  included in the  accompanying
management  assertion.  Management is responsible  for the Company's  compliance
with those minimum  servicing  standards and for maintaining a fidelity bond and
errors and  omissions  policy.  Our  responsibility  is to express an opinion on
management's  assertion about the entity's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards and  maintenance  of a fidelity  bond and errors and omissions  policy
based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that the  Company  complied  with the
aforementioned  minimum servicing standards and that the Company had in effect a
fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amounts of $100,000,000 and
$28,500,000,  respectively,  as of and for the year ended  December 31, 1999 is
fairly stated in all material respects.

Arthur Andersen LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
February 10,2000
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-12 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-12 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-12 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-12 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-12 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-12 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-12 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-12 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-12 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 9 of 9
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-30485 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

GERALD SMITH,
DefendantAppellant.

------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 99-CR-30015-3

--------------------------------------------------------

February 9, 2001 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges:
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Gerald Smith has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Smith has received a copy of counsel’s
motion and brief, and he has filed a pro se brief of his own. Our review of the briefs filed by counsel
and Smith and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous point for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL
IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.
<PAGE>   1
11. Statement re computation of per share earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Third Quarter Ended               Nine Months Ended
                                                           June 30,                         June 30,
                                                    2000             1999             2000             1999
                                                -----------      -----------      -----------      -----------

<S>                                             <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
Net income in thousands                         $     5,783      $     4,612      $    14,119      $    10,379

Weighted average shares outstanding
                                                 14,834,479       14,628,174       14,487,438       15,087,774
Assumed exercise of stock options,
weighted average of incremental shares
                                                  1,290,676          372,448        1,405,326          330,624
Assumed purchase of stock under stock
purchase plan, weighted average
                                                     88,498            4,564           70,602               --
                                                -----------      -----------      -----------      -----------
Diluted shares - adjusted weighted-average
shares and assumed conversions                   16,213,650       15,005,186       15,963,366       15,418,398
                                                ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========

Basic earning per share                         $      0.39      $      0.32      $      0.97      $      0.69
                                                ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========

Diluted earnings per share                      $      0.36      $      0.31      $      0.88      $      0.67
                                                ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10.12(d)**

 

**AWARD OF LTIP UNITS**

**PURSUANT TO THE 2006 CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER HOLDINGS LLC**

**LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN**

 

THIS AWARD (the “Award”) is made as of January 1, 2006, byConsolidated Container Holdings LLC (the “Company”) to                                 (the “Participant”) pursuant to the2006 Consolidated Container Holdings LLC Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”). Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meanings given to such terms in the 2006 Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto.

 

1. Grant of Award. Pursuant to and subject to the termsand conditions of the 2006 Plan, the Company hereby grants to Participant an Award of                                 LTIP-B Units. 

 

2. Terms of Award. As more fully described in the 2006 Plan, eachLTIP-B Unit equates to one percent (1%) of Bonus Pool-B, provided, however, that such percentage shall be subject to adjustment (up or down) based on several factors set forth in the 2006 Plan. The amount of Bonus Pool-B and the amount of theAward shall be established upon the occurrence of a Liquidity Event. This Award shall be payable in cash within one hundred twenty (120) days of the Liquidity Event, subject to any applicable restrictions in any Company Debt Instruments.

 

3. Vesting. The LTIP-B Units granted hereunder shallcommence vesting as of January 1, 2006, and shall vest at a rate of twenty percent (20%) on each one-year anniversary of such date while the Participant remains employed with the Company. 

 

4. Non-transferability. This Award may not be assigned, alienated,pledged, attached, sold or otherwise transferred or encumbered except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. 

 

5. Forfeiture. Subject to certain exceptions provided in the 2006 Plan, all or a portion of this Award shall be forfeited in the event oftermination of your employment with the Company prior to the occurrence of a Liquidity Event. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Consolidated Container Holdings LLC, acting by and through its duly authorized officers, has caused this Award to be executed as of the date set forth above.
Order entered May 29, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01347-CR

RICHARD BIGGS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court At Law No. 1

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11CL-0993-2

ORDER

The Court GRANTS the State’s May 26, 2013 motion for extension of time to file the 

State’s brief.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the State’s brief as of the date of this order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
1

Filed 8/26/15 P. v. Williams CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ANTWINE THEODORE WILLIAMS,

Defendant and Appellant.

C078337

(Super. Ct. No. 09F03756)

Defendant Antwine Theodore Williams appeals from an order denying a petition 

to recall his so-called “three strikes” sentence, brought pursuant to the provisions of the 

Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012, codified at Penal Code section 1170.126.1 (See 

Teal v. Superior Court (2014) 60 Cal.4th 595.)

Defendant’s petition to recall his sentence and for resentencing was denied, the 

commitment offense being robbery. (See §§ 211, 667.5, subd. (c)(9), 1170.126, 

subd. (e)(1), 1192.7, subd. (c)(19).)

 

1

 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.
2

Counsel was appointed to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an 

opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and requesting this court to review the 

record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende

(1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Counsel advised defendant of his right to file a supplemental 

brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, 

and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination 

of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more 

favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION

The judgment (order) is affirmed.

 RAYE , P. J.

We concur:

 BLEASE , J.

 NICHOLSON , J.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1816 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1816

 To prohibit the manufacture for sale, offer for sale, distribution in 
commerce, or importation into the United States of any crib bumper, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 12, 2019

Ms. Duckworth (for herself, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Brown, 
 Mr. Durbin, and Mr. Cardin) introduced the following bill; which was 
  read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the manufacture for sale, offer for sale, distribution in 
commerce, or importation into the United States of any crib bumper, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Cribs Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SALE OF CRIB BUMPERS.

    (a) Prohibition on the Sale of Crib Bumpers.--Beginning on the date 
that is 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, it shall be 
unlawful for any person to manufacture for sale, offer for sale, 
distribute in commerce, or import into the United States any crib 
bumper.
    (b) Treatment of Violation.--A violation of subsection (a) shall be 
treated as a violation of section 19(a)(1) of the Consumer Product 
Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(1)).
    (c) Crib Bumper Defined.--In this section, the term ``crib 
bumper''--
            (1) means any material that is intended to cover the sides 
        of a crib to prevent injury to any crib occupant from impacts 
        against the side of a crib or to prevent partial or complete 
        access to any openings in the sides of a crib to prevent a crib 
        occupant from getting any part of the body entrapped in any 
        opening; and
            (2) includes a padded crib bumper, a supported and 
        unsupported vinyl bumper guard, a mesh crib liner, and vertical 
        crib slat covers.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration    Statements on    Form S-3    (File    No. 333-70426,    333- 40026, 333- 104830    333-113419    and    333-115982),    and    Form S-8    (File    No. 333-86338,333-95529,333-95551,333-49489,33-33322,33-46928 and    33-46929) of    HEI, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated November 29,    2007, which appears on page 65 of this annual report on    Form 10-K    for the year ended September 1, 2007. /s/ VIRCHOW,    KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP         Minneapolis, Minnesota    November 30, 2007
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-36910, 333-36912, 333-36914, 333-36918, 333-36934, 333-40904, 333-63012
and 333-63022 of T/R Systems, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated
February 25, 2002, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
T/R Systems, Inc. for the year ended January 31, 2002.



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Atlanta, GA
April 22, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PrimeEnergy Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles E. Drimal Jr., Chief Executive Officer of PrimeEnergy Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Charles E. Drimal Jr.

-----------------------------

Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2006

 

 

 

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PrimeEnergy Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Beverly A. Cummings, Chief Financial Officer of PrimeEnergy Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.

 

 

 

/s/ Beverly A. Cummings

------------------------------

Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2006
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-22-00480-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV-2022-03594-JP

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

JACQUELINE WALDROUP, Appellant

V.

SOMERSET APARTMENTS, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Appellant’s brief was due on May 12, 2023. On May 23, 2023, we notified her

that her brief had not been filed as the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure require. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We warned that we could dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution unless, within ten days, Appellant filed a brief and an accompanying

motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimeliness. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). More than twenty days have passed, but we have not received a

response.

Because Appellant has failed to file a brief, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: June 22, 2023
#### TRAVEL AGENCY v. DUNN

No. 39 PC.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 706.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 April 1974.
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 40 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 2 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 3 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 4 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 5 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 6 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 7 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 8 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 9 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 10 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 11 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 12 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 13 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 14 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 15 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 16 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 17 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 18 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 19 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 20 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 21 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 22 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 23 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 24 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 25 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 1-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 26 of 26
#### MARSHALL v. MILLER

No. 3 PC

Case below: 47 N.C. App. 530

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 November 1980.
Case 1:07-cv-03417-DAB-DCF Document 12-4 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03417-DAB-DCF Document 12-4 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03470-NRB Document 3 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03470-NRB Document 3 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03470-NRB Document 3 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03470-NRB Document 3 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03470-NRB Document 3 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03470-NRB Document 3 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 6 of 6
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

###### Office of Research and Development

# AGENCY:

Office of Research and Development, VA.

# ACTION:

 Notice of Government Owned Invention Available for Licensing.

# SUMMARY:

The invention listed below is owned by the U.S. government as represented by the Department of Veterans Affairs, and is available for licensing in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 207 and 37 CFR part 404 and/or Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADA) Collaboration under 15 U.S.C. 3710a to achieve expeditious commercialization of results of Federally-funded research and development. Foreign patents are filed on selected inventions to extend market coverage for U.S. companies and may also be available for licensing.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Technical and licensing information on the invention may be obtained by writing to: Amy E. Centanni, Department of Veterans Affairs, Director, Technology Transfer Program, Office of Research and Development, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420; fax: 202-254-0255; e-mail at:                         *amy.centanni@mail.va.gov.*

Any request for information should include the Number and Title for the relevant invention as indicated below. Issued patents may be obtained from the Commissioner of Patents, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC 20231.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The invention available for licensing is: U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/690,696 “Compositions and Methods for Osteogenic Gene therapy.”

Dated: November 22, 2005.

Gordon H. Mansfield,

Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

[FR Doc. 05-23447  Filed 11-28-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0232

JAMES DAVID SIMPSON, ) 

 Petitioner/Appellant, ) 

vs. ) ORDER GRANTING FIRST

) EXTENSION OF TIME TO

) FILE APPELLEE’S ANSWER

MUSSELSHELL COUNTY BOARD ) BRIEF 

OF COMMISSIONERS, ) 

Respondent/Appellee. )

_______________________________)

Respondent/Appellee has moved the Court pursuant to M.R.App.P. 26 for an 

extension of time up to and including December 17, 2020 to file and serve the 

Appellee’s Answer Brief. This is the first request for an extension of time. 

Opposing counsel for Petitioner/Appellant has been contacted and does not object 

to the extension of time.

Pursuant to Rule 26, M.R.App.P. 26, and good cause appearing, Appellee 

Musselshell County Board of Commissioners is granted an extension of time up to 

and including December 17, 2020 to file its Answer Brief.

_____________________________________

Montana Supreme Court Justice

cc: Counsel of Record

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

November 12 2020

11/12/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0232
Case 1:07-cv-03364-LAK Document 5-4 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 1 of 1