alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.23

RETENTION AGREEMENT

This Retention Agreement (the "Agreement") is made and entered into effective as of December , 2000, by
and between  (the "Employee") and NetRatings, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company").

R E C I T A L

In order to provide the Employee with enhanced financial security and sufficient encouragement to remain with the Company, the Board of Directors of the
Company (the "Board") believes that it is imperative to provide the Employee with certain benefits upon the involuntary termination of the Employee's employment provided that such termination was not
for cause.

A G R E E M E N T

In consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and the continued employment of the Employee by the Company, the parties agree as follows:

1.At-Will Employment.The Company and the Employee acknowledge that the Employee's
employment is and shall continue to be at-will, as defined under applicable law. If the Employee's employment terminates for any reason, the Employee shall not be entitled to any payments,
benefits, damages, awards or compensation other than as provided by this Agreement, or as may otherwise be established under the Company's then existing employee benefit plans or policies at the time
of termination.

2.Severance Benefits.



1

---



3.Definition of Terms.The following terms referred to in this Agreement shall have the following
meanings:



2

---



4.Other Activities.



5.Successors.



3

---



6.Notices.Notices and all other communications contemplated by this Agreement shall be in writing and
shall be deemed to have been duly given when personally delivered or when mailed by U.S. registered or certified mail, return receipt requested and postage prepaid. In the case of the Employee, mailed
notices shall be addressed to him at the home address which he most recently communicated to the Company in writing. In the case of the Company, mailed notices shall be addressed to its corporate
headquarters, and all notices shall be directed to the attention of its Secretary.

7.Miscellaneous Provisions.



4

---

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Agreement, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the day and year first above written.

|COMPANY:  |  | NETRATINGS, INC.
|--------- |  | ----------------
|          |  | By:             
|          |  |                 
|          |  | Title:          
|          |  |                 
|          |  |                 
|EMPLOYEE: |  | [EMPLOYEE NAME] 
|          |  |                 
|          |  |                 

5

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of Kimball International,Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, James C. Thyen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 

| Date: November 5, 2009 |   |                                                    |
|------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | /s/ James C. Thyen                                      |
|                   |   | JAMES C. THYEN    President,    Chief Executive Officer |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

MEDTECH PRODUCTS, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

RANIR, LLC, et al.,

 Defendants.

07 CV 03302-UA-LMS

RULE 7.1 STATEMENT

ECF Filed 

MEDTECH PRODUCTS, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

DENTEK ORAL CARE, INC.,

 Defendant.

 

MEDTECH PRODUCTS, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

POWER PRODUCTS, INC.,

 Defendant.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and to enable District Judges 

and Magistrate Judges of the Court to evaluate possible disqualification or recusal, 

the undersigned counsel for Dentek Oral Care, Inc. (a private nongovernmental party) certifies that Dentek Oral Care, Inc. has no parent corporation 

and that no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.

Date: May 30, 2007 s/ Alan Federbush

Alan Federbush (AF-5250)

PROSKAUER ROSE LLP

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036-8299

Tel.: (212) 969-3000

Fax: (212) 969-2900

Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 14 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

---------------------------------- -x 

IN RE: Fosamax Troducta Liability : YIlT.1 No. 1789 

Lit igat icn 

1 : 06-md-1789 (JFK) ---.--- - --------------- ---x Order 

I'hjs Document R~lates tu: All Actlons : 

---------------- - S 

JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District Judge: 

gefendant MFY-~k has requested that I hear the rrcltrion to 

cornrjel w'rllch PLaintiffs flled sr. April 18, 2CG8 tefore Magistrate 

Ju,~~P Francis. The mct lcjn 2pprars q,rl L ai~~ :ji ECL'\,-YT~; i 95~~3 t]-.ily 

may nave a broad inpact on this MDL and, therefore, T would 

prefer t3 resolve the motion. Per the parties' stipulated 

briefing sched~le, Mtrck' s response is due on May ;2, 2G08 and 

Plaintiff's reply is due an May 19, 2033 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: New York, New York 

April 24, 2008 

,/ JOHN F. KEENAN 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 27 Filed 04/25/2008 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          13,530
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,868
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,038
<INVENTORY>                                     10,183
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,906
<PP&E>                                          38,422
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,099
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,409
<BONDS>                                          3,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           197
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,694
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,099
<SALES>                                         71,215
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,215
<CGS>                                           28,520
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,520
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (104)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,885
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,506
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,379
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,379
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.35


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 19 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 19 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 19 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 19 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 19 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 19 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 6 of 6
C OURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RAYMUNDO CARRANZA

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 6

- 00 298

- C R

Appeal from the

409 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20150D00299 )

O R D E R

The Appellant’s brief was due with this Court on October 30, 2017 with t hree final

extensions having been granted

. Appellant’s attorney, Mr. Ruben P. Morales filed a sixth motion

for extension of time on November 1 , 201 7 requesting an additional 2 2 days to file his brief.

However, before the Court acts on the motion it will be necessary for the trial court to conduct a

hearing.

Therefore, it is ORDERED that the trial court conduct a hearing in order to determine if

appellant wishes to continue the appeal and if appellant has been deprived of effective assistance

of counsel.

Further, the trial court shall forward its findings to the District Clerk of El Paso County,

Texas, on or before November 22, 2017 . The District Clerk shall prepare and forward a

supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and forward the same to this Court on or

before December 2, 2017 . Further, the transcription of the hearing shall be prepared, certified

and filed with this Court on or before December 2, 2017

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2 nd d ay of November

, 20 1 7

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox , JJ.
Case 1:07-cv-03243-WHP-HBP Document 30 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03243-WHP-HBP Document 30 Filed 05/28/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 19-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 19-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 2 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 19-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 3 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 19-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 4 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 19-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 5 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 19-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 6 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 19-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 7 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 19-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 8 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 19-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 9 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 19-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 10 of 10
Case 1:06-cv-14941-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
"_ _-.- -. -- " -A-._-_A-.... .-- -1. ---'- 't \ r. -- ~ ~ 

: ,, . \.. r s :,.-I){, :,;..:.LJ::. ! :. 

i. 

:- '- : : 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK . . 

~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

IN RE: 

i MASTER FILE 

FOSAMAX PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION 

i I :06-MD-I 789 (SFK) 

Tliis Dorrl~nor~ Hclilres To ,411 Actiolis 

CASE MANAGEblENT ORDER NO. 14 

(Regarding Motions to Remand) 

SOHN F. KEENAh1, Unitcd States 1)istricl .ludgc: 

It has beconic apparent that motions to remand \\zl~icli wcre filed in transfcror 

courts and rcmain pending belorc this Court. as well as thosc which are expcctcd to be filed in 

this Court. \rill raise overlapping challenges to this Court's subject matter jurisdiction. In ordcr 

to resolve thcse jurisdiclional issues promptly and efficiently, it is hcreby ORDERED (hat: 

1. For cases transrerrcd to this Cou~t on or heforc March 1, 2008: All remand 

motions shall be served on the Defendant by March 31. 2008. DeTendant shall sen-c its responsc 

to thcse remand motions on or before April 21, 2008. Plaintiffs may servc a reply on or before 

May 2, 2008. On May 2, 2008, cach party shall file its molion papers and provide the Court 

\\it11 courtesy copies. Defendant also shall file on tlic master docket a list of all cascs with 

rcmand motions pending as of that datc. 

2. For cases transfcrred to this Court aftcr March 1, 2008: On thc last business 

day of Junc 2008 and aery sccond month thereafter, DeTendant shall notify thc Court of any 

ne\v remand motions that have been filed. Defcndant shall file and selvc papers in opposition 

thcreto within fourtecn days. PlaintiSfs affected by such motions may scrve and file rcply 

papers. and provide the Court with courtesy copies ofthcir motion papers, within fourteen days 

thereafter. 

SO ORDERED 

Daled: Ncw York. N.Y. 

Decenlbcr z./ , 200? 

- 

United States District Judse 

Case 1:07-cv-03464-JFK Document 19 Filed 12/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.4
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Thomas J. Madden, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of PFSweb, Inc.; and
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
 
 
 
 By:/s/Thomas J. MaddenThomas J. MaddenChief Financial Officer
 
 Date: April 29, 2020
Case 1:07-cv-03211-PKC     Document 10      Filed 06/20/2007     Page 1 of 1
#### F.D.I.C. v. LOFT APARTMENTS

No. 47 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 473.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 April 1979.
#### WILLIAMSON v. SALTER

No. 42 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 405.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 October 1976.
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 10-6 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 10-6 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 10-6 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 10 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 10 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 12 Filed 05/13/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 12 Filed 05/13/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 12 Filed 05/13/2008 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 29, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 71472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23371]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OBM Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by December 
29, 2005.
    Title and OMB Number: Corps of Engineers Civil Works 
Questionnaires--Generic Clearance; OMB Control Number 0710-0001.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 185,500.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 185,500.
    Average Burden Per Response: 5 minutes (average).
    Annual Burden Hours: 17,307.
    Needs and Uses: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers utilizes the data 
collected from the questionnaire items for planning data to formulate 
and evaluate alternative water resources development plans, to 
determine the effectiveness and evaluate the impacts of Corps projects, 
and in case of the flood damage mitigation, to obtain information on 
flood damage incurred, whether or not a project is being considered or 
exists. All survey questionnaires are administered either by face-to-
face, mail, or telephone methods. Public surveys are used to gather 
data for planning and operating Corps projects and facilities and to 
determine public preferences and satisfaction.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; business or other for-
profit; not-for-profit institutions; farms; and state, local or tribal 
government.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. James Laity. Written comments and 
recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent 
to Mr. Laity at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer for 
DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings. Written requests for 
copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Ms. 
Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management Division, 1777 North Kent 
Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 22209-2133.

    Dated: November 21, 2005.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 05-23371 Filed 11-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON D C

FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT

Under Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED
September 30, 1995
Commission File: 0-1999

KENTUCKY INVESTORS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in Charter)

            KENTUCKY                         61-6030333
(State of other jurisdiction               (IRS Employer 
of incorporation or organization)          Identification Number)

200 Capital Ave. P.O. Box 717 Frankfort KY 40602
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant's telephone number - (502) 223-2361


Securities registered pursuant to Section 13 (g) of the Act:

Common Capital Stock, par value $1.00 per share  (Title of Class)

Number of outstanding shares as of September 30, 1995 - 785,689
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES_X_   NO____
        
                                             
PART II  -  OTHER INFORMATION

         
ITEM 6.   Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
 
     
(b)  There were no reports filed on Form 8-K during the quarter ended September
30, 1995.

(c)  Exhibit 27 - Financial Data Schedule.


                                SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


KENTUCKY INVESTORS, INC.

November 14, 1995
DATE                                           \s\
                                           BY: Harry Lee Waterfield II
                                           President
November 14, 1995
DATE                                           \s\
                                           BY: Jimmy R. McIver, 
                                           Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-29-1998
<CASH>                                             268
<SECURITIES>                                       465
<RECEIVABLES>                                      403
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,884
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,261
<PP&E>                                           8,079
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,533
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,251
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,927
<BONDS>                                          1,696
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              982
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           492  
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,028
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,251
<SALES>                                          7,515
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,515
<CGS>                                            5,908
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,908
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  74
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     84
<INCOME-TAX>                                        24
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 47
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        47
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6646

BERNARD DRAYTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT, at Charleston, South

Carolina; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CA-95-379-2-8AJ)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 4, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Drayton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Drayton

v. United States Dep't of Justice, No. CA-95-379-2-8AJ (D.S.C. Apr.

6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED