alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: July 2, 2015 105978 

________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

NEW YORK,

Respondent,

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BOBBY T. JENKINS,

Appellant.

________________________________

Calendar Date: May 27, 2015

Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Garry and Devine, JJ.

__________

Linda B. Johnson, West Sand Lake, for appellant.

Weeden A. Wetmore, District Attorney, Elmira (John R.

Thweatt of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Devine, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung

County (Hayden, J.), rendered April 12, 2013, convicting

defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale

of a controlled substance in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a six-count indictment related to the

sale and possession of cocaine on three occasions, defendant

pleaded guilty to one count of criminal sale of a controlled

substance in the third degree. He was sentenced, as an admitted

second felony offender, to the agreed-upon prison term of four

years with three years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now

appeals.
-2- 105978 

We affirm. Defendant's contention that he did not receive

the effective assistance of counsel is not preserved for our

review as the record does not reflect that he made an appropriate

postallocution motion (see People v Moses, 110 AD3d 1118, 1118

[2013]). In any event, "[i]t is well settled that in the context

of a guilty plea, a defendant has been afforded meaningful

representation when he or she receives an advantageous plea and

nothing in the record casts doubt on the apparent effectiveness

of counsel" (People v Wares, 124 AD3d 1079, 1080 [2015] [internal

quotation marks and citation omitted], lv denied 25 NY3d 993

[2015]). Counsel pursued appropriate pretrial motions and

discovery, and ensured that the controlled substance lab reports,

which reflected that the substances tested positive for the

presence of cocaine, were received before proceeding with the

plea agreement. Were this issue properly before us, we would

find that the record reflects that defendant received meaningful

representation (see id.). Any challenge to counsel's preplea

motion practice or discovery efforts was forfeited by defendant's

guilty plea (see People v Hansen, 95 NY2d 227, 230-231 [2000];

People v Trombley, 91 AD3d 1197, 1201 [2012], lv denied 21 NY3d

914 [2013]). Finally, to the extent that defendant makes

arguments addressed to matters outside the record, such as what

counsel investigated, they are more properly raised in a motion

to vacate pursuant to CPL article 440 (see People v Brown, 125

AD3d 1049, 1050 [2015]).

Peters, P.J., Lahtinen and Garry, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 70858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23196]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, Communication of People With 
Mental Retardation.
    Date: December 2, 2005.
    Time: 10:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Marita R. Hopmann, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Building, Room 5B01, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6911, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 8, 2005.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-23196 Filed 11-22-05; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
Case 1:06-cv-15045-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### SMITH v. HOUSE OF KENTON CORP.

No. 152 PC.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 439.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 30 December 1974.
#### STATE v. BENFIELD

No. 59 PC.

Case below: 9 N.C. App. 657.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 5 January 1971.
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/23/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/23/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 27 Filed 10/23/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### MANUFACTURING CO. v. MANUFACTURING CO.

No. 17 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 414.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 September 1975.
185729.1 6/29/2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

ARMAND CORLEW, VINCENT RIGGI, STEPHEN

CERNAK, JR., RUTH DEPAOLO and ANGELO RIGGI,

individually and on behalf of a class similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, MONSANTO

COMPANY, PHARMACIA CORPORATION and SOLUTIA,

INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 07-CV-3258

(VM)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on June 29, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of the District Court using the CM/ECF system, which sent notification of such filing to the

following:

James K. Leader jkleader@leaderberkon.com

Thomas K. Richards trichards@leaderberkon.com

Leader & Berkon, LLP

Attorneys for Solutia, Inc.

Carol A. Rutter carol.rutter@husch.com

Adam E. Miller adam.miller@husch.com

Husch & Eppenberger, LLC

Attorneys for Monsanto Company and Pharmacia Corporation

Lawrence P. Biondi lbiondi@lpblawfirm.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Law Offices of Lawrence P. Biondi

s/Arthur J. Siegel

_____________________________

Arthur J. Siegel

Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 24-2 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cr-00371-PKC     Document 8      Filed 01/08/2008     Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PrimeEnergy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Beverly A. Cummings, Chief Financial Officer of PrimeEnergy Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|/s/ Beverly A. Cummings                    
|Beverly A. Cummings Chief Financial
Officer
|May 20, 2009
Case 1:06-cv-15125-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 11-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 11-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 11-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 11-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 4 of 4
#### McKINNEY v. BOARD OF ALCOHOLIC CONTROL

No. 114 PC.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 369.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 3 December 1974.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5672 

To protect the use of traditional hunting and fishing equipment on Federal 

lands and to prevent unnecessary and unwarranted restrictions on the 

implements and equipment used by hunting and fishing communities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 1, 2010 

Mr. BROUN of Georgia (for himself, Mr. BOREN, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. 

ALTMIRE, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. CHILDERS, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. 

REHBERG, Mr. ROSS, and Mr. SCALISE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To protect the use of traditional hunting and fishing equipment on Federal lands and to prevent unnecessary and 

unwarranted restrictions on the implements and equipment used by hunting and fishing communities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS. 

4 (a) LIMITATION.—Except as provided by subsection 

5 (b), no Federal funds appropriated or made available to 

6 the Department of the Interior or the Department of AgriVerDate Mar 15 2010 22:59 Jul 02, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5672.IH H5672

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5672 IH

1 culture, and any of their agencies or bureaus, may be used 

2 to prohibit, limit, or control, based on material composi3 tion, the type of firearm ammunition or fishing tackle used 

4 on Federal lands managed by the Department of the Inte5 rior or the Department of Agriculture. 

6 (b) EXCEPTIONS.—Nothing in section 1 shall affect 

7 the use of Federal funds to continue to prohibit, limit or 

8 control, based on material composition, the type of firearm 

9 ammunition or fishing tackle used for hunting and fish10 ing— 

11 (1) to the extent that a specific regulation is in 

12 effect on the date of the enactment of this Act; or 

13 (2) if the best scientific evidence available dem14 onstrates that the material composition of the am15 munition or fishing tackle to be prohibited, limited, 

16 or controlled is having or is likely to have a substan17 tially detrimental effect on the health of a local fish 

18 or wildlife population. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 20-7 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 20-7 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 20-7 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 20-7 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 20-7 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 5 of 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             928
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,922
<ALLOWANCES>                                       128
<INVENTORY>                                      9,293
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,556
<PP&E>                                          12,930
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,697
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,858
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,350
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,533
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,800
<SALES>                                         22,108
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,108
<CGS>                                           14,904
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,904
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,577
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 687
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,997)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (534)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,463)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,463)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)
        

</TABLE>
Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 10-4 Filed 05/13/2008 Page 1 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 10-4 Filed 05/13/2008 Page 2 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 10-4 Filed 05/13/2008 Page 3 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 10-4 Filed 05/13/2008 Page 4 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 10-4 Filed 05/13/2008 Page 5 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 10-4 Filed 05/13/2008 Page 6 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 10-4 Filed 05/13/2008 Page 7 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 10-4 Filed 05/13/2008 Page 8 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 10-4 Filed 05/13/2008 Page 9 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 10-4 Filed 05/13/2008 Page 10 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 10-4 Filed 05/13/2008 Page 11 of 11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER 

SITE LITIGATION 

 21MC102(AKH)

KRZYSZTOF SZCZEPANSKI (AND WIFE, ANNA 

SZCZEPANSKI), 

Plaintiff(s), 

-against100 CHURCH LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

 06CV15084(AKH)

NOTICE OF ADOPTION BY 

ZAR REALTY 

MANAGEMENT CORP. OF 

ANSWER TO MASTER 

COMPLAINT

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant ZAR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. 

n/k/a SAPIR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. for the building located at 100 Church 

Street, (hereinafter “Zar/Sapir”) as and for its response to the allegations set forth in the 

Complaint by Adoption (Check-Off Complaint) related to the Master Complaint adding new 

defendants not previously served filed in the above-referenced action, herein adopts Zar/Sapir 's 

Answer to Master Complaint dated August 1, 2007, which was filed in the matter of In re World 

Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). ZAR/SAPIR has 

filed a Master Disclosure of Interested Parties in 21 MC 102 (AKH), and as such, is exempt from 

having to file such a disclosure in this specific matter, pursuant to the provisions of Case 

Management Order No. 4 (¶ J(2)). 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT defendant, Zar/Sapir reserves its right to 

assert any defenses to which it is entitled, including but not limited to those enumerated in Case 

Management Order No. 4 (¶¶ D(1)-(5)). 

Case 1:06-cv-15084-AKH Document 10 Filed 12/05/2007 Page 1 of 3
WHEREFORE, Zar/Sapir demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned action as 

against it, together with its costs and disbursements. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 December 4, 2007 

HARRIS BEACH PLLC 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ZAR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. n/k/a 

SAPIR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. 

 /s/ 

 Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062) 

100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor 

New York, New York 10005 

(212) 687-0100 

TO: 

Paul Napoli, Esq. 

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP 

115 Broadway, 12th Floor 

New York, New York 10006 

Robert A. Grochow, Esq. 

Robert A. Grochow, P.C. 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq. 

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiff

James E. Tyrrell, Esq. 

Joseph Hopkins, Esq. 

Patton Boggs LLP 

One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

Thomas Egan, Esq. 

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP 

One Liberty Plaza 

New York, New York 10006 

Liaison Counsel for the Defendants 

All Counsel via ECF 

Case 1:06-cv-15084-AKH Document 10 Filed 12/05/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATION AS TO SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on December 4, 2007, I caused to be filed and 

served the following document electronically via the Court’s ECF system upon the parties: 

1. Notice of Zar Realty Management Corp.’s Adoption of Answer to Master 

Complaint. 

Dated: December 4, 2007 

 /s/ 

 Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062) 

Case 1:06-cv-15084-AKH Document 10 Filed 12/05/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03211-PKC Document 14 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### GODWIN SPRAYERS v. UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.

No. 694P82.

Case below: 59 N.C. App. 497.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 28 January 1983.
Case 1:06-cv-15033-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 23.2





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.'s
33-22990, 33-38210, 33-51588, 33-61624 of Jackpot Enterprises, Inc. on Form
S-3 and Registration Statement No.'s 2-83273, 2-98984, 33-27288, 33-38209 and
33-86078 of Jackpot Enterprises, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated
September 25, 2000, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of J Net
Enterprises, Inc. formerly known as Jackpot Enterprises, Inc. for the year
ended June 30, 2001.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
October 12, 2001
#### STANSFIELD v. MAHOWSKY

No. 284 PC

Case below: 46 NC App 829

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 15 August 1980.
#### CHAVIS v. REYNOLDS

No. 81 PC.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 734.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 November 1974.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

ii .,.>.- !. 

I i 

L,.uL, 3: . --!I 

1: -~\ +,.1-,,2 :;ii,~,s;-): ,I i;. *i 2.. -I$--~I-o~ -- \! ! ' 

--.." ~.. ^."_.I.._ --- -' 

-_, 1'- -~.. 

.. 

IN RE: Fosamax Products Liability : 

Litigation 

1: 06-md-1789 (JFK) 

Order -------------------------------.--- X 

This Document Relates to: All Actions : 

--------.-----------------------.-- X 

JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District Judge: 

The Plaintiff's Steering Committee ("PSC") has 

requested an evidentiary hearing in advance of oral argument on 

the class certification motions that are currently pending before 

the Court. For the reasons discussed below, the PSC's request is 

DENIED. 

In determining whether to certify a class, a court must 

resolve any factual disputes relevant to each requirement of 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. In re Initial Public Offerinq 

Securities Litiqation, 471 F.3d 24, 41 (2d Cir. 2006). In 

connection with the instant class certification motion, the 

parties have created and the Court has reviewed an extensive 

evidentiary record. This record consists of the expert 

affidavits of plaintiff's dental experts, Robert E. Marx, D.D.S 

and Alistair N. Goss, D.D.Sc; plaintiff's claims administration 

expert Paul Mulholland, C.P.A., C.V.A.; defendant's medical 

expert, John Bilezikian, M.D.; defendant's expert Jeri W. Nieves, 

PH.D., an epidemiologist who specializes in osteoporosis; 

Case 1:07-cv-03465-JFK Document 13 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 2
defendant's oral and maxillofacial expert Robert S. Glickman, 

D.M.D.; and defendant's chemistry expert, Paul A. Bartlett. The 

parties have also submitted excerpts from the deposition 

transcripts of several of these experts; the interrogatory 

responses, deposition transcripts and plaintiff profile forms 

("PPF's") of the three putative class representatives, Mr. Trent 

Nichols, Jr., M.D., Ms. Aline Trahan, and Ms. Greta V. Murphy; an 

August 2004 post-marketing safety review from the FDA's Office of 

Drug Safety; and an FDA report showing the number of cases in 

which doctors reported adverse drug experiences associated with 

Fosamax in 1996. The parties have also brought to the Court's 

attention over forty articles and chapters from the oral and 

maxiilofacial, medical and dental scientific literature 

discussing osteonecrosis of the jaw ("ONJ") and its causes, 

diagnosis, treatment and relationship to oral bisphosphonates 

such as Fosamax. 

This record provides a sufficient factual basis to 

determine whether plaintiffs' motlons meet Rule 23's requirements 

and an evidentiary hearing will not be necessary. Accordingly, 

the PSC's request is denied. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: &2~Ccy~ 3 / ' G(? 7 

/ 

( JOHN F. KEENAN 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03465-JFK Document 13 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 21**

 

**Subsidiaries**

 

ACNielsen eRatings.com (Delaware)

Netcrawling Deutschland GmbH (Germany)

Netcrawling UK Limited (United Kingdom)

Mediametrie NetRatings (France)

NetRatings Japan (Japan)

NetRatings Australia Pty Ltd (Australia)

NetRatings (Shanghai) Company, Ltd. (China)

NetRatings Spain, S.L. (Spain)

NetValue Ltd (United Kingdom)

NetValue Deutschland GmbH (Germany)

NetValue Internet Measurement SA (Spain)

NTRT eRatings India Private Limited (India)

Red Sheriff Ltd (United Kingdom)

Red Sheriff Ltd (Bermuda)

Red Sheriff New Zealand Limited (New Zealand)

Red Sheriff Pte Ltd (Singapore)

Red Sheriff Inc. (Delaware)

Red Sheriff Kabushiki Kaisha (Japan)

Red Sheriff S.r.l. (Italy)

Red Sheriff Australian Pty Ltd (Australia)

Red Sheriff Europe Pty Ltd (Australia)

Red Sheriff Asia Pty Ltd (Australia)

Red Sheriff BV (The Netherlands)

Traffion Technologies Pty Limited (Australia)

 

----
#### WILLIAMS v. WILLIAMS

No. 207 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 509.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 September 1976.
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 37 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 37 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 37 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 37 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 37 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03243-WHP-HBP Document 36 Filed 07/22/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03243-WHP-HBP Document 36 Filed 07/22/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-15032-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15032-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15032-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15032-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15032-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15032-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15032-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15032-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15032-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15032-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15032-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15032-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15032-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13