alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### William H. Barrett and Charles R. Barrett v. Nicholas V. Boddie.

1. *Eviction—Smolcing Chimney—Landlord and*Tenant.—The chimney smoked badly. The landlord promised to fix it, but neglected to do so. He said thepremises were worth more than the tenant was paying, and the tenant replied i'f the chimney was not fixed he should have to move out. *Held,*not tending to prove an eviction.

Memorandum.—Action for rent. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Abner Smith, Judge, presiding.

Affirmed in this court.

Opinion filed January 10, 1895.

Statement of the Case.

These were actions in assumpsit brought by Fichólas V. Boddie, appellee, against William H. Barrett and Charles B. Barrett, copartners as Barrett *&*Barrett, appellants, as guarantors of a certain lease made by appellee to one Fie. Baquet. The lease in question was executed by appellee through Boddie Brothers, as agents, appellee being a nonresident. Two actions were brought against the appellants, one for the rent due prior to Fovember 1, 1893, and the other for the rent for the month of Fovember, 1893.

On the trial, the two actions were consolidated and tried as one canse, a separate verdict in each case, however, being returned by the jury. The record of the two causes are substantially alike, except in the amounts of rent sought to be recovered.

Hollett & Tinsman, attorneys for appellants.

Woolfolk & Browning, attorneys for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Upon the trial the tenant testified that he left the premises because the chimney broke down and he could not cook any more.

*227This testimony being objected to, appellants’ counsel went on to say that they would show that it was the purpose of the landlord to evict the tenant; but they offered no such evidence, and conceding as they did, that all that was done, was done by Boddie Bros., through whom the premises were leased, appellant not only failed to show that Boddie Bros, were authorized to do anything toward evicting the tenant but did not offer to show acts of Boddie Bros., that if done by appellee would have amounted to an eviction.

The utmost shown or offered in this direction was that the chimney smoked badly, and that Boddie Bros., appellee’s agents, often promised to fix it, but neglected to do so. Also, that there was some talk with Boddie Bros, to the effect that the premises were worth much inore than the tenant was paying, and that he told Boddie Bros, that if the chimney was not fixed he should have to move out.

This evidence did not tend to prove an eviction, and was properly excluded from the jury. The plaintiff was fairly entitled to recover, and the judgments of the Circuit Court are affirmed.
#### IN RE FARMER

No. 255 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 97.

Petition by Osie Farmer for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 October 1981.
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR Document 13 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6847
JOHN PATRICK MCSHEFFREY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus MARK A. HENRY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-98- 1543-AMD) Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 24, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Patrick McSheffrey, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McSheffrey v. Henry , No. CA-98-1543-AMD (D. Md. May 22 & June 2, 1998). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 1 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 2 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 3 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 4 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 5 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 6 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 7 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 8 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 9 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 10 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 11 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 12 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 13 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 14 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 15 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 16 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 17 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 3-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 18 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-29 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-29 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-29 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-29 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-29 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-29 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 6 of 6
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.6



Report of Independent Accountants


Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. (the "Bank"),
Administrator of the Chase Credit Card Owner Trust Series 1999-3



We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Report on Internal Control over the Administration of the Chase Credit Card
Owner Trust Series 1999-3 (the "Owner Trust"), that Chase Manhattan Bank USA NA
(the "Bank") maintained effective internal control over its administration of
the Certificates held by the Owner Trust and the Notes issued by the Owner Trust
(the "Administration" of the Owner Trust) as of December 31, 2003, based upon
the criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal Control -
Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. The Bank's management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over the Administration of the Owner Trust. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included obtaining an understanding of internal control over the
Administration of the Owner Trust, testing and evaluating the design and
operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatement due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of internal control over the Administration of the Owner Trust to
future periods are subject to the risk that the internal control may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Bank maintained effective
internal control over Administration of the Certificates held by the Owner Trust
and the Notes issued by the Owner Trust as of December 31, 2003, is fairly
stated, in all material respects, based upon the criteria for effective internal
control established in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 29, 2004
Case 1:06-cv-15111-AKH Document 6 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-15111-AKH Document 6 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.1

                              AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS


RESOLVED, that the Bylaws of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation are hereby amended,
effective August 26, 1999, in the following respects:

Section 3.02 is amended to insert the words "Chairman of the Board, the,"
immediately preceding the word President in the first sentence.

Section 4.03 is amended to insert the words "Chairman of the Board, the,"
immediately prior to the word "President."

Section 4.09 is amended by changing the first sentence to begin:  "The Chairman
of the Board or, in his absence, the President shall call to order . . . "

Section 5.03 is amended to insert the words, "Chairman of the Board, the"
immediately prior to the word "President."

Section 5.08 is amended to insert the words, "Chairman of the Board, the"
immediately prior to the word "President."

Section 5.10 is amended by changing the first sentence to read:  "At each
meeting of the Board, the Chairman of the Board or, in his absence, the
President, shall preside."

Section 7.01 is amended to insert the words "Chairman of the Board, a"
immediately prior to the word "President."

Section 7.05 is amended by changing the word "President" to read "Chairman of
the Board."

A new Section 7.06 is added, reading as follows:

     Section 7.06.  The President shall be the chief operating officer of the
     corporation and shall be in charge of its day-to-day business operations,
     subject to the Chairman of the Board and the Board.  The President shall
     have such duties and responsibilities as are incident to the position of
     Chief Operating Officer or as are assigned to him by the Chairman of the
     Board or the Board.  In the event of the absence or disability of the
     Chairman of the Board, the President shall perform the duties and exercise
     the powers of the Chairman of the Board.
<PAGE>

Sections 7.07, 7.08, 7.09 and 7.10 are amended to change the word "President"
wherever it appears to read "Chairman of the Board."

Sections 7.06, 7.07, 7.08, 7.09, 7.10 and 7.11 (as numbered prior to this
amendment) are renumbered as Sections 7.07, 7.08, 7.09, 7.10, 7.11, 7.12.
Exhibit 15.1



Deloitte.

Deloitte Accountants B.V.

Oostmaaslaan 71

3063 AN
Rotterdam

P.O. Box 4506

3006 AM Rotterdam

Netherlands



Tel: +31 (10) 8801400

Fax: +31 (10) 8801616

www.deloitte.nl



ASM International N.V.

Jan van Eycklaan 10

3723 BC BILTHOVEN



|                    |  |                    |  |                         
|------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | ------------------------
|Date March 29, 2005 |  | From K.J.N. Bakkes |  | Reference 1142900/le9982



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement No. 33-07111, 33-07109, 333-87262, 333-11060, 33-6184, 33-6185, 33-6186, 33-78628 and 33-93026 of ASM International N.V. on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-08080, 333-11502, 333-11234 and 333-107339 of ASM International N.V. on
Form F-3 of our report dated February 24, 2005, except for Note 28, as to which the date is March 16, 2005 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion), appearing in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of ASM
International N.V. for the year ended December 31, 2004.



/s/ Deloitte Accountants
B.V.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1414 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1414

          To provide bankruptcy relief for student borrowers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 9, 2019

 Mr. Durbin (for himself, Ms. Warren, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. 
 Brown, Ms. Harris, Ms. Hirono, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Markey, 
 Mr. Merkley, Mr. Reed, Mr. Sanders, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. 
 Whitehouse, and Ms. Hassan) introduced the following bill; which was 
       read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To provide bankruptcy relief for student borrowers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Student Borrower Bankruptcy Relief 
Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Exception to Discharge.--Section 523 of title 11, United States 
Code, is amended in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (8).
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1328(a)(2) of title 11, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``(8),''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Effective Date.--Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act 
and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date of 
enactment of this Act.
    (b) Application of Amendments.--The amendments made by this Act 
shall apply only with respect to cases commenced under title 11, United 
States Code, on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Pilot Accounted For From World War II (Mitchell, H.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 13-3 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 5 of 5
**EXHIBIT
      10.34**


**Oleg
      Logvinov**


**27
      Beacon Hill Drive**


**East
      Brunswick, NJ 08816**











October
      10,
      2006








Kirk
      Warshaw, CFO


Arkados
      Group,, Inc.


220
      Old
      New Brunswick Road, Suite 202


Piscataway,
      NJ 08854





Re:  Employment
      Agreement dated as of May 23, 2004





Dear
      Kirk:





I
      refer
      you to the above referenced agreement. Pursuant to Section 3c) of the agreement,
      a bonus of $65,333 was payable to me as of December 28, 2005. I hereby agree
      to
      temporarily waive this default for a period of 30 days ending November 9,
      2006





The
      temporary waive is made with full reservation of any rights I have under the
      employment agreement and applicable law and does not alter my letter dated
      July
      19, 2006 relating to the payment of deferred payroll.





Please
      confirm your receipt of this letter by signing below and returning a copy to
      me
      by facsimile or e-mail, original by mail.






Very
              truly yours,/s/ Oleg
              LogvinovOleg
              Logvinov






cc:      
      Herbert H. Sommer, Esq.


Len
      Breslow,
      Esq.







Receipt
      confirmed:






CDKNET.COM,
      INC.








By:
      _________________________________


Kirk Warshaw, CFO
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DEVENSON A. WALKER,

Appellant,

v.

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, et al.,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2948

[May 5, 2022]

Appeal of nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrea Gundersen, Judge; L.T. Case 

No. CACE18-01706.

Devonson A. Walker, Sunrise, pro se.

Richard S. McIver of Kass Shuler, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### STATE v. SPRINGS

No. 124 PC.

Case below: 16 N.C. App. 641.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 18 January 1973.
Case 1:07-cv-03522-PKC Document 7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03522-PKC Document 7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 7332

DANIEL ERIC COBBLE , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. KENNY ATKINSON; MATTHEW G. WHITAKER; US BUREAU OF PRISONS; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF GEORGIA; DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BALDWIN COUNTY GEORGIA; DISTRICT ATTORNEY, COBB COUNTY GEORGIA; DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CHEROKEE COUNTY GEORGIA; US MARSHALS; GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WILCOX COUNTY GEORGIA; NC ATTORNEY GENERAL , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appe al from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:17

- hc

- 02153

- D )

Submitted : December 20, 2018 Decided: December 27, 2018

Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges, a nd TRAXLER , Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Daniel Eric Cobble , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Daniel Eric Cobble appeals the distri ct court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition . On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Cobble ’ s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’ s disposition, Cobble has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”) . Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We deny Cobble’s motion for reconsideration of our order substit uting a
party. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2005 / Notices 71609 

Dated: November 22, 2005. 

Gordon H. Mansfield, 

Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 05–23448 Filed 11–28–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320–01–M 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS 

Office of Research and Development 

Government Owned Invention 

Available for Licensing 

AGENCY: Office of Research and 

Development, VA. 

ACTION: Notice of Government Owned 

Invention Available for Licensing. 

SUMMARY: The invention listed below is 

owned by the U.S. Government as 

represented by the Department of 

Veterans Affairs, and is available for 

licensing in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 

207 and 37 CFR part 404 and/or 

Cooperative Research and Development 

Agreements (CRADA) Collaboration 

under 15 U.S.C. 3710a to achieve 

expeditious commercialization of 

results of Federally-funded research and 

development. Foreign patents are filed 

on selected inventions to extend market 

coverage for U.S. companies and may 

also be available for licensing. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Technical and licensing information on 

the invention may be obtained by 

writing to: Amy E. Centanni, 

Department of Veterans Affairs, 

Director, Technology Transfer Program, 

Office of Research and Development, 

810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20420; fax: 202–254–0255; e-mail at: 

amy.centanni@mail.va.gov. 

Any request for information should 

include the Number and Title for the 

relevant invention as indicated below. 

Issued patents may be obtained from the 

Commissioner of Patents, U.S. Patent 

and Trademark Office, Washington, DC 

20231. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

invention available for licensing is: U.S. 

Provisional Patent Application No. 60/ 

702,874 ‘‘Agents for Inhibiting 

Lymphocyte or Tumor Proliferation and 

Methods Thereof.’’

Dated: November 22, 2005. 

Gordon H. Mansfield, 

Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 05–23463 Filed 11–28–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320–01–M
EXHIBIT
10.1

    

    


    


    “ARTICLE
V

    


    SHARES
SUBJECT TO THE PLAN

    


    A.           Subject
to the provisions of Article XII A hereof, an aggregate of 6,000,000 Shares
shall be reserved for issuance upon the grant of Stock Rights or the exercise of
Options granted under the Plan.”