alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1896 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a presumption of 

service connected disability for certain veterans who served in Palomares, 

Spain, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 19, 2019 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself, Ms. WARREN, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a 

presumption of service connected disability for certain 

veterans who served in Palomares, Spain, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Palomares Veterans 

5 Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1896 IS

1 SEC. 2. PRESUMPTION OF SERVICE CONNECTED DIS2 ABILITY FOR CERTAIN VETERANS WHO 

3 SERVED IN PALOMARES, SPAIN. 

4 (a) DISABILITY COMPENSATION.—Section 

5 1112(c)(3)(B) of title 38, United States Code, is amended 

6 by adding at the end the following new clause: 

7 ‘‘(v) Onsite participation in the response 

8 effort following the collision of a United States 

9 Air Force B–52 bomber and refueling plane 

10 that caused the release of four thermonuclear 

11 weapons in the vicinity of Palomares, Spain, 

12 during the period beginning January 17, 1966, 

13 and ending March 31, 1967.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE AND APPLICABILITY.— 

15 (1) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made 

16 by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the 

17 enactment of this Act. 

18 (2) APPLICABILITY CONCERNING DEPENDENCY

19 AND INDEMNITY COMPENSATION.—For purposes of 

20 section 1310 of title 38, United States Code, the 

21 amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with 

22 respect to a death notwithstanding whether such 

23 death occurred before, on, or after such date. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Donald DOMINIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-30436.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 2, 2005.

Keith Michael Couture, Chalmette, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Henry Ernest Velte, III, Social Security Administration, Office of General Counsel, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before DAVIS, SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

*526PER CURIAM: *

Donald Dominio appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner’s decision denying in part his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits. Dominio challenges the administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s) determination that, given his capacity for light and sedentary work, and his age, education, and work experience, Dominio was able to perform a significant number of jobs that exist in the national economy during the time period June 17, 1993, through September 20, 1999, and therefore that he was not disabled during that period.

Dominio argues that the district court relied erroneously upon the ALJ’s finding that he was capable of performing a significant number of jobs through September 20, 1999, because the ALJ had stated the opposite conclusion during the administrative hearing. We review the ALJ’s decision, not the district court’s ruling. *See Ripley v. Chater,*67 F.3d 552, 555 (5th Cir.1995). The ALJ stated clearly in her written opinion that, during the period June 17, 1993, through September 20, 1999, Dominio was capable of performing a significant number of jobs that exist in the national economy.

Dominio also argues that the ALJ’s finding that he was not disabled prior to September 21, 1999, is not supported by substantial evidence in the record. Dominio contends that the ALJ should have used the date of the onset of his disability— June 17, 1993—because he proved that his disability began with his injury on that date. The ALJ’s finding regarding Dominio’s ability to perform substantial gainful activity was supported by substantial evidence and based on proper legal standards. *See id.*

Dominio asserts further that the ALJ’s use of the medical-vocational guidelines was inappropriate because he had non-exertional limitations. Because Dominio’s limitations exceed those in the medical-vocational guidelines, the ALJ properly utilized the testimony of a vocational expert (VE). *See Carey v. Apfel,*230 F.3d 131, 145 (5th Cir.2000). Dominio does not challenge the VE’s testimony or the hypothetical posed to the VE and the ALJ did not err in relying on the VE’s testimony. *See Bowling v. Shalala,*36 F.3d 431, 436 (5th Cir.1995).

Finally, Dominio’s claim that the ALJ should have obtained complete medical records or clarifications from two of his physicians fails because he has not shown that he was prejudiced by the ALJ’s failure to obtain the records. *See Kane v. Heckler,*731 F.2d 1216, 1220 (5th Cir.1984).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Case 1:07-cv-03476-GEL Document 8 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 1 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 2 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 3 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 4 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 5 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 6 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 7 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 8 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 9 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 10 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 11 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 12 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 13 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 14 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 15 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 16 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 17 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 18 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 19 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 20 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 21 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 22 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 23 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 24 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 25 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 26 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 27 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 28 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 29 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 30 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 31 of 32Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 23-7 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 32 of 32
Case 1:07-cr-00362-LBS Document 8 Filed 01/23/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 1:07-cr-00362-LBS Document 8 Filed 01/23/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 1:07-cr-00362-LBS Document 8 Filed 01/23/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 1:07-cr-00362-LBS Document 8 Filed 01/23/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 1:07-cr-00362-LBS Document 8 Filed 01/23/2008 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-15026-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### HOUCK v. OVERCASH

No. 24 PC.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 581.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 3 October 1972.
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION



### November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 5

- 0 0 348

- C V

Style: David Cole d/b/a Financial Funding Group

v

. Hung Nguyen

Date motion filed: September 16 , 201 4

Type of motion: Motion to Withdraw a s Attorney of Record

Party filing motion: Andre’ L. Ligon , counsel for appellant

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date:

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

Andre’ L. Ligon motion to withdraw as appellant’s counsel is granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.5. Counsel Andre’

L. Ligon is ordered to immediately notify the appellant in writing of all deadlines and settings of which counsel is

a ware, and file a copy of the notice with the Clerk of this Court. See T EX

. R. APP

. P. 6.5( C ).

Judge's signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd



Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date:

_ October 1, 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1886 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1886

  To restrict security assistance to Lebanon, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2019

 Mr. Cruz (for himself and Mr. Cramer) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To restrict security assistance to Lebanon, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Countering Hezbollah in Lebanon's 
Military Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEBANESE ARMED FORCES AND 
              HEZBOLLAH.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the President shall submit a report to 
Congress--
            (1) identifying all military officers, commanders, 
        advisors, officials, or other personnel with significant 
        influence over the policies or activities of the Lebanese Armed 
        Forces who are members of, paid by, or significantly influenced 
        by Hezbollah; and
            (2) describing military activities conducted by the 
        Lebanese Armed Forces to disarm Hezbollah pursuant to United 
        Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1701 (2006).
    (b) Form.--The report required under subsection (a) shall be 
submitted in unclassified form but may contain a classified annex.

SEC. 3. RESTRICTION ON SECURITY ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--Of the amounts appropriated or otherwise made 
available for security assistance for the Government of Lebanon for a 
fiscal year, 20 percent may not be obligated or expended for such 
purpose until the President certifies to Congress that--
            (1) the Lebanese Armed Forces has taken measurable steps in 
        the last year to limit the influence or expel anyone identified 
        pursuant to section 2(a)(1);
            (2) the activities described pursuant to section 2(a)(2) 
        demonstrate a serious commitment by the Lebanese Armed Forces 
        to fulfill its obligation to disarm Hezbollah pursuant to UNSCR 
        1701; and
            (3) the Lebanese Armed Forces have not cooperated, 
        coordinated, or partnered with Hezbollah in any operation, 
        campaign, or military exercise during the last year.
    (b) National Security Waiver.--The President may waive the 
certification requirements under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection 
(a) if the President certifies to Congress that it is in the national 
security interest of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
0- , . . . , . . ,. .. . . . . . .. -.-.--- --..-...,-. _ . ---- ----.----- -"---dx 

j i:Sii\.<: SDNY "1 

1 fig (;l,!y$f<r 1 i l i 

I EI~~yg;tr.:.;e,~;,.~y F~I,;~D 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -A;..--.- 

IN RE: 

: MASTER i:11,E 

FOSAMAX PRODUCTS LIABII,ITY LITIGATION 

I I :06-MD-I 789 (JFK) 

This Document Relates 7b .4N ilctions 

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE ON ORAL MOTION 

Upon the oral motion of William .I. Beausolcil, attorney for defendant Merck &: Co., Inc., and 

said sponsor attorney's declaration that applicant James M. Doran, Jr. is a member in good 

standing of the bar of the United States District Court for the MiddIe District of Tennessee; 

and that applicant's contact information is as follows: 

Applicant's Name: James M. Doran, Jr. 

Firm Namc: Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis 

Addrcss: Nashville City Center, 51 1 Union Strcet, Suite 2700 

CityIStatclZip: Nashville. Tenncssee 372 19 

TeicphoneIFax: (6 15) 850-8843/(615) 244-6804 

Email Address: jim.doran@,wallerlaw.com 

said applicant having requested admission pro hac vice to appcar for all purposes as counsel for 

Merck & Co., Inc. in the above entitled action: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that James M. Doran, Jr, is admitted to practice pro hac vice in the 

above captioned case in the United States District Court fbr the Southern District of New York. 

All attorneys appearing before this Court are suhject to the Local Rules of this Court, including 

thc Rulcs governing discipline of attomcys. If this action is assigned to thc Electronic Case 

Filing (ECF) system, counscl shall immediately apply for an ECF password at 

Case 1:07-cv-03462-JFK Document 4 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 1 of 3
2 

\v\\w.n~~sd.uscourisb~o~~. Counsel shall immediately forward the pro hac vice fee to the Clerk of 

the Court. 

Dated: June 212007 

New York, New York 

--- 

-united States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03462-JFK Document 4 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 2 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DlSTRICT OF TENNESSEE 

CERTlFlCATE OF GOOD STANDlNG 

1. KEITH THROCKMORTON. Clerk ofthe llnited Stalcs District Court for the 

Middle District of'l'enncssee. do herebq certilicd that .JAMES M. DOHAN was duly 

admitted to practice in said Court on April 10, 1970, and is in good standing as a member 

of thc bar ofsaid Court. 

Dated at Nashville. 'l'enncssee on May 29, 2007 

KI;I'TI~I THKOCKMORTON, CI,EIU -- Deputy CI 

Case 1:07-cv-03462-JFK Document 4 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03211-PKC Document 13 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03211-PKC Document 13 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03211-PKC Document 13 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              32
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      926
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        478
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,483
<PP&E>                                           1,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,111
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              920
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           159
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,183
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,103
<SALES>                                          4,353
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,353
<CGS>                                            1,695
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,690
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,032
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,036)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,036)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,036)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1794 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1794

 To amend title 31, United States Code, to permit the Secretary of the 
 Treasury to determine the metal composition of certain coins, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 12, 2019

   Ms. Ernst introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 31, United States Code, to permit the Secretary of the 
 Treasury to determine the metal composition of certain coins, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Currency Evolution Now To Save Act'' 
or the ``CENTS Act''.

SEC. 2. METAL COMPOSITION OF CERTAIN COINS.

    Section 5112(b) of title 31, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``(b)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the Secretary may prescribe a 
composition of materials in, and a construction of, the half dollar, 
quarter dollar, dime, or 5-cent coin that varies from the composition 
and construction required under that paragraph with respect to the coin 
(including by using different metals in the alloy for the coin than 
those required under that paragraph) if that action by the Secretary--
            ``(A) reduces the overall cost of minting the coin; and
            ``(B) does not affect--
                    ``(i) the diameter and weight of the coin specified 
                under subsection (a); or
                    ``(ii) the functionality of the coin, including the 
                electromagnetic signature with respect to the 
                acceptance of the coin.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 03-15-00348-CV

______________________________________

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

______________________________________

TODD ENRIGHT

Appellant,

v.

ASCLEPIUS PANACEA, LLC; ASCLEPIUS PANACEA GP, LLC; DAILY

PHARMACY, LLC; DAILY PHARMACY GP, LLC; AND TOTH

ENTERPRISES II, P .A. D/B/A VICTORY MEDICAL CENTER,

Appellees.

______________________________________

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF ADDITIONAL

COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT TODD ENRIGHT

______________________________________

On Appeal from the 98th Judicial District Court

of Travis County, Texas

Trial Court No. D-1-GN-14-004689

Hon. Gisela D. Triana of the 200th Judicial District Court, Presiding

__________________________________

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

Michael A. Heidler of Vinson & Elkins LLP hereby enters his appearance as

additional counsel of record for Appellant Todd Enright. The information required

by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.2 is as follows:

ACCEPTED

03-15-00348-CV

7436727

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

10/19/2015 2:52:32 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/19/2015 2:52:32 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
2

Michael A. Heidler

State Bar No. 24059921

VINSON & ELKINS LLP

2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100

Austin, Texas 78746-7568

Tel 512.542.8579

Fax 512.542.8612

mheidler@velaw.com

Jennifer B. Poppe of Vinson & Elkins LLP will remain lead counsel for Appellant

Todd Enright.

Respectfully submitted,

VINSON & ELKINS LLP

/s/ Michael A. Heidler

Jennifer B. Poppe

State Bar No. 24007855

Michael A. Heidler

State Bar No. 24059921

Jonah Jackson

State Bar No. 24071450

2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100

Austin, Texas 78746

Telephone: (512) 542-8400

Facsimile: (512) 542-8612

jpoppe@velaw.com

mheidler@velaw.com

jjackson@velaw.com

Attorneys for Appellant Todd Enright
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on the 19th day of October 2015, a true and

correct copy of this notice was served on the following attorneys in accordance

with the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure via electronic

filing or email.

Eric J. Taube

Paul Matula

Rola Daaboul

Taube Summers Harrison Taylor Meinzer

Brown LLP

100 Congress Avenue, 18th Floor

Austin, Texas 78701

etaube@taubesummers.com

pmatula@taubesummers.com

rdaaboul@taubesummers.com

/s/ Michael A. Heidler

Michael A. Heidler
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1693 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1693

          To reauthorize the National Flood Insurance Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 23 (legislative day, May 22), 2019

   Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice, 
              considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To reauthorize the National Flood Insurance Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Flood Insurance Program 
Extension Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM.

    (a) Financing.--Section 1309(a) of the National Flood Insurance Act 
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended by striking ``May 31, 2019'' and 
inserting ``June 14, 2019''.
    (b) Program Expiration.--Section 1319 of the National Flood 
Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is amended by striking ``May 31, 
2019'' and inserting ``June 14, 2019''.
    (c) Retroactive Effective Date.--If this Act is enacted after May 
31, 2019, the amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) shall take 
effect as if enacted on May 31, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 28 Filed 05/07/2008 Page 1 of 1
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 24 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 24 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 2 of 12
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 24 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 3 of 12
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 24 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 4 of 12
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 24 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 5 of 12
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 24 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 6 of 12
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 24 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 7 of 12
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 24 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 8 of 12
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 24 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 9 of 12
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 24 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 10 of 12
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 24 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 11 of 12
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 24 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 12 of 12