alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 227 (Monday, November 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 71332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23325]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Hearing of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of 
Civil Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on 
Rules of Civil Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of open hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The public hearing on proposed amendments to the Federal Rules 
of Civil Procedure, scheduled for December 2, 2005, in Washington, DC, 
has been canceled. [Original notice of hearing appeared in the Federal 
Register of July 14, 2005.]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee 
Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 
Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

    Dated: November 21, 2005.
John K. Rabiej,
Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.
[FR Doc. 05-23325 Filed 11-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
Exhibit
32.2






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Katy Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending
March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Amir Rosenthal, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Amir
Rosenthal


Amir
Rosenthal


Chief
Financial Officer


May 13,
2008











The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to
accompany this report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 32(b) Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  I, Mark J. Plush, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Keithley Instruments, Inc.
(the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:(1)
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2004
which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Mark J. PlushMark J. Plush
Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 9, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Keithley Instruments, Inc. and
will be retained by Keithley Instruments, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE v. WEBB

No. 10 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 526.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 25 August 1975.
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 8 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 8 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 2 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 8 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 3 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 8 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 4 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 8 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 5 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 8 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 6 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 8 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 7 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 8 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 8 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 8 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 9 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 8 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 10 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 8 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 11 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 8 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 12 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 8 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 13 of 14
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 8 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 14 of 14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

-------------------------------------------------------x 

ANTHONY FRATTIN on behalf of himself

and others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

 

v. 

WEST 44th STREET RESTAURANT LLC, 

d/b/a KELLARI TAVERNA, STAVROS 

AKTIPIS, and HARSHAD SHAH, 

 

Defendants. 

--------------------------------------------------------x 

INDEX NO: 07 CV 3383 (PAC) 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Upon the next affidavits of Anthony Frattin (and exhibit attached thereto), “John 

Doe,” and Maimon Kirschenbaum, and the accompanying memorandum of law, as well 

as other papers and prior proceedings in this action, it is hereby; 

ORDERED that Defendants or their attorneys show cause at a hearing before the 

honorable Judge A. Crotty, United States District Judge, in courtroom 20C of the United 

States Courthouse, New York, New York, on _____________, 2007, at ___:___ __M, or 

as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, why an order should not be entered granting 

Plaintiffs a preliminary injunction, pursuant to the Court’s inherent powers and Rule 

65(a) of the federal rules of civil procedure relief, (a) requiring Defendants to reinstate 

Plaintiff, (b) enjoining Defendants from further acts of retaliation, including but not 

limited to, terminating and/or threatening to terminate employees that join this lawsuit 

without giving prior notice to Plaintiff’s counsel, demonstrating legitimate nonCase 1:07-cv-03383-PAC Document 9 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
discriminatory reasons for such termination and (c) requiring Defendants to publish a 

letter and a poster to all employees at Kellari stating that retaliation for participating is 

illegal, together with the name , phone number and address of Plaintiff’s firm. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants, their agents and employees, and all 

other persons acting in concert with them, are hereby temporarily restrained and enjoined 

from retaliating against any Plaintiff for participating in this lawsuit and prohibited from 

firing or taking any other adverse employment action against any Plaintiff without 

providing Plaintiffs and this Court with advance notice of such action, and demonstrating 

to this Court a legitimate business reason for such adverse employment action. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is permitted to file a Declaration of a 

current non-Plaintiff employee with the name of the declarant redacted and refer to the 

declaration as the “John Doe” declaration. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDRED that Plaintiff shall serve by hand delivery upon 

Defendants’ counsel a copy of this Order To Show Cause and the papers upon which it is 

based no later than ___:___ __M on ________________, 2007; that Defendants shall 

serve by hand delivery upon Plaintiffs’ counsel any opposition to the above motion no 

later than ___:___ __M on ________________, 2007; and that Plaintiff shall serve by 

hand delivery upon Defendants’ counsel any reply in support of the above motion no later 

than ___:___ __M on ________________, 2007. 

 __________________________ 

 U.S.D.J. 

Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC Document 9 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03430-BSJ-AJP Document 7 Filed 07/19/2007 Page 1 of 1
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.17 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-2 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-2 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>
  
<ARTICLE>     9
<MULTIPLIER>  1000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                             30,887
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                134
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                   12,600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                        0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>       190,785
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>             23,128
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>               24,515
<LOANS>                           592,198
<ALLOWANCE>                        12,115
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    871,423
<DEPOSITS>                        750,224
<SHORT-TERM>                        3,260
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                11,419
<LONG-TERM>                        23,475
<COMMON>                           16,036
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                         67,009
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>    871,423
<INTEREST-LOAN>                    52,971
<INTEREST-INVEST>                  12,822
<INTEREST-OTHER>                    1,378
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                   67,171
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                 26,166
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 27,572
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>              39,599
<LOAN-LOSSES>                       1,800
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                   (137)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                    32,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    11,423
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>         11,423
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                        8,380
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        1.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                        1.75
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                       5.07
<LOANS-NON>                         4,571
<LOANS-PAST>                        1,203
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                      138
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                         0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                   18,752
<CHARGE-OFFS>                       9,538
<RECOVERIES>                        1,101
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                  12,115
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                    0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                     0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>            12,115

        

</TABLE>
Case 7:07-cv-03332-CLB-MDF Document 5 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to April 16, 2019)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

A-18-713 Lynn v. Saathoff

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-22 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-22 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, Plaintiff v. CLAYTON LUCK and Wife, ELOISE LUCK, W. D. LUCK, and Wife, FLORRIE B. LUCK, Defendants.

(Filed 2 December, 1964.)

Appeal by defendants from *Riddle, S.J.,*May 1964 Civil Session of Randolph.

Plaintiff instituted this action in March 1962 to acquire a perpetual easement across defendants’ lands for use in constructing a by-pass, around Asheboro, on U.S. 220. The by-pass is a controlled access highway. Plaintiff estimated $1,274.00 as fair compensation for the taking. It deposited this sum with the court.

Plaintiff took 6.86 acres. This left defendants with a triangular tract containing one acre on the west side of the highway. This area is served by a service road constructed by plaintiff. Defendants are also left with a triangular tract on the east side of the highway. This piece contains 3.48 acres. It has no immediate access to the by-pass, but does have access by means of a private road across a tract containing 1.30 *126acres .purchased by defendants in 1960 to afford access to their larger tract.

. The pleadings raise only one issue: What is fair compensation? This issue was submitted to the jury. It answered: $2,600.00. The court thereupon entered judgment for defendants for $1,326.00, the difference between, the amount fixed by the verdict and the $1,274.00 deposited with the declaration of taking, plus interest on $1,326.00 from March 9, 1962, the date of the taking, to the rendition of the judgment.

Defendants excepted and appealed.

*Ottway Burton for defendant appellants.*

*Attorney General T. W. Bruton, Assistant Attorney General Harrison Lewis, Trial Attorney Claude W. Harris for plaintiff appellee.*

Pee: Cueiam.

Defendants, conforming to the requirements of Rule 27% (254 N.C. 809; G.S. 4A, p. 184), propound this question: “Did the trial court make so many prejudicial errors in the rulings on the admissibility of evidence against the landowners that they were deprived of their property without due process of law as set out in the nine assignments of error and the first twenty-nine of the defendants’ exceptions?” We have examined each of defendants’ twenty-nine exceptions challenging the court’s rulings on evidentiary matters. Our examination discloses no prejudicial error in the admission or exclusion of evidence. This is true whether the exceptions be considered individually or in the aggregate..

Defendants insisted their property should be valued for use as a residential area and, if so valued, the evidence would justify an award in sums varying from $22,000.00, estimated by defendant C. W. Luck, to $8,950.00, estimated by defendants’ witness, Keeling.

>• .Plaintiff’s witnesses testified the property was not suitable for residential development. They based their estimates of value on an acreage basis. Their estimates of damage varied from a low of $940.00 to a high of $1,148.00. What was .fair compensation was a question of fact for jury determination. That determination was reached without error, prejudicial to defendants.

No error.
Case 1:06-cv-15121-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15121-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15121-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15121-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15121-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15121-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15121-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15121-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15121-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15121-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15121-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15121-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15121-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1



                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                     NAME                                  JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION
                     ----                                  ----------------------------
<S>                                                        <C>
               Caminus Limited                                     United Kingdom
        (subsidiary of the Registrant)

               DC Systems, Inc.                                        Texas
        (subsidiary of the Registrant)

            Caminus Energy Limited                                 United Kingdom
       (subsidiary of Caminus Limited)

           Zai*Net Software Limited                                United Kingdom
       (subsidiary of Caminus Limited)

         Caminus Consultants Limited                               United Kingdom
       (subsidiary of Caminus Limited)

           DCS Gas*Net Corporation                                      Texas
       (subsidiary of DC Systems, Inc.)

         Caminus/DC Acquisition Corp.                                 Delaware
        (subsidiary of the Registrant)

         Caminus (Canada) Corporation                                  Canada

        Altra Software Services, Inc.                                 Delaware
        (subsidiary of the Registrant)

      Altra Transaction Management Corp.                              Delaware
(subsidiary of Altra Software Services, Inc.)

  Altra Canada Transaction Management Corp.                            Canada
(subsidiary of Altra Software Services, Inc.)

          Unified Information, Inc.                                  Washington
(subsidiary of Altra Software Services, Inc.)
</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03475-LAP Document 7-4 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 7, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-11196

Summary Calendar

 

ELLEN M. ORTIZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:99-CV-212

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ellen M. Ortiz appeals the district court’s judgment

affirming the denial of her application for disability insurance

benefits and supplemental security income. Ortiz contends that

she is entitled to relief because (1) the Administrative Law

Judge (ALJ) should have found her disabled under § 1.05 of the

Listing of Impairments, 20 C.F.R. Pt. 404, Subpt. P., App. 1;

(2) the vocational expert (VE) committed perjury at her 1998
No. 02-11196

-2-

administrative hearing; (3) the ALJ’s hypothetical question

to the VE did not include all of her proven impairments; and

(4) the VE failed to identify a significant number of jobs in

the economy which she could perform.

We AFFIRM, essentially for the reasons stated in the

magistrate judge’s report, which the district court adopted. 

See Ortiz v. Barnhart, No. 2:99-CV-0212 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 20,

2002).

AFFIRMED.
Case 7:07-cv-03457-KMK Document 6 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### Frank Parmelee v. John L. Johnson.

1. *Deposition—Immaterial Questions.*

Memorandum.—Appeal from, the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. George W. Blanks, Judge, presiding.

Affirmed,

February 12, 1895.

Edmund Furthmann, attorney for appellant.

Mr. Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question made in this case is whether a deposition, to suppress which no motion was ever made, the witness testifying to the value of his luggage, consisting mostly of articles of wearing apparel, is competent as evidence of such value; which hardly rises to the dignity of a question. Lundberg v. Mackenhauser, 4 Ill. App. 603.

The judgment is affirmed.