Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 226 / Friday, November 25, 2005 / Notices 71085 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign–Trade Zones Board 

(Docket 57–2005) 

Foreign–Trade Zone 181 - Akron/ 

Canton, Ohio 

Application for Expansion 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: An 

application has been submitted to the 

Foreign–Trade Zones Board (the Board) 

by the Northeast Ohio Trade & 

Economic Consortium (NEOTEC), 

grantee of FTZ 181, requesting authority 

to expand and reorganize its zone in the 

seven–county northeast Ohio area, and 

to add two new sites in and adjacent to 

the Cleveland Customs port of entry. 

The application was submitted pursuant 

to the provisions of the Foreign–Trade 

Zones Act (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the 

regulations of the Board (15 CFR Part 

400). It was formally filed on November 

14, 2005. 

FTZ 181 was approved by the Board 

on December 23, 1991 (Board Order 546, 

57 FR 41; 1/2/92). On March 13, 1998, 

the grant of authority was reissued to 

NEOTEC (Board Order 965, 63 FR 

13837; 3/23/98). The zone was 

expanded in 1997 (Board Order 902, 62 

FR 36044; 7/3/97), in 1998 (Board Order 

968, 63 FR 16962; 4/7/98), in 1999 

(Board Order 1053, 64 FR 51291; 9/22/ 

99), in 2002 (Board Order 1260, 67 FR 

71933; 12/3/02), and in 2004 (Board 

Order 1334, 69 FR 30281; 5/27/04). FTZ 

181 currently consists of seven sites in 

the northeast, Ohio area covering the 

Counties of Summit, Trumbull, 

Mahoning, Columbiana, Stark, 

Ashtabula, and Portage. 

The applicant is now requesting 

authority to update, expand and 

reorganize the zone as described below. 

The proposal also requests authority to 

reduce certain existing sites, and to add 

several new industrial park sites. 

Overall, the zone would be increased by 

647 acres. 

Site 1 (Summit County) will be 

reorganized and expanded by 

transferring 12 acres from the 

northwestern and central portions 

of the Cuyahoga Falls Industrial 

Park to the southern portion of the 

Park; by deleting the 20–acre Terex 

Road parcel; and, adding 88 acres to 

the southwestern portion of the 

Hudson Drive/Prosper Industrial 

Park. Site 1 would cover 736 acres. 

Site 4 (Stark County) will be 

reorganized by deleting 9 acres from 

the southwestern portion of the 

819–acre Intermodal Facility, 

located at 5000 Maryland Avenue, 

SW, Navarre; and adding three new 

parcels (150 acres total) as follows: 

(5 acres) I–77 - SR 30 Center, 

located at 1411 Navarre Road, SW; 

(142 acres) Canton Commerce 

Development LLC, I–77 & Faircrest 

Road; and, (3 acres) Dillard 

Property/RRR Development, located 

at 8817 Pleasantwood Avenue, NW, 

Lake Township. Site 4 would cover 

1,338 acres. 

Site 5 (City of Mansfield) will be 

expanded by adding 29 acres at 20–

40 South Airport and 21 acres at 41 

Cairns Road, Mansfield. 

Proposed Site 8 (Medina County, 4 

Parcels, 247 acres total) would 

involve the Beacon Transportation 

Park (111 acres) between Interstate 

Routes 71 & 76, Seville; the 

Brunswick Commerce Center (38 

acres) on Interstate Parkway, 

Brunswick; the Portside Corporate 

Park (51 acres) 2200 Akron–Medina 

Road, Sharon Township; and, the 

Wadsworth Corporate Park (47 

acres), Wadsworth, Medina County, 

Ohio. 

Proposed Site 9 (Wayne County, 141 

acres) would involve the Route 30 

Industrial Park, State Route 30, 

Wooster, Wayne County, Ohio. 

No specific manufacturing requests 

are being made at this time. Such 

requests would be made to the Board on 

a case–by case basis. 

In accordance with the Board’s 

regulations, a member of the FTZ Staff 

has been designated examiner to 

investigate the application and report to 

the Board. 

Public comment on the application is 

invited from interested parties. 

Submissions (original and 3 copies) 

shall be addressed to the Board’s 

Executive Secretary at the address 

below. The closing period for their 

receipt is [60 days from date of 

publication]. Rebuttal comments in 

response to material submitted during 

the foregoing period may be submitted 

during the subsequent 15-day period (to 

[75 days from date of publication]). 

A copy of the application and 

accompanying exhibits will be available 

for public inspection at each of the 

following locations: 

U.S. Department of Commerce, Export 

Assistance Center, 600 Superior 

Avenue, East Suite 700,Cleveland, 

Ohio, 44114. 

Office of the Executive Secretary, 

Foreign–Trade Zones Board, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, FCB - 

Suite 4100W, 1099 14th St. NW, 

Washington, D.C. 20005. 

Dated: November 16, 2005. 

Dennis Puccinelli, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05–23282 Filed 11–23–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(A–549–812) 

Notice of Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review: Furfuryl 

Alcohol from Thailand 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 21, 2005, the 

Department of Commerce published the 

preliminary results of the administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on furfuryl alcohol from Thailand. The 

period of review is July 1, 2003, through 

June 30, 2004. The final results do not 

differ from the preliminary results of 

this review, in which we found that 

sales of the subject merchandise have 

not been made below normal value. We 

will instruct the U.S. Bureau of Customs 

and Border Protection not to assess 

antidumping duties on the subject 

merchandise exported by this company. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 25, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andrew Smith or Brandon Farlander, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1276 and (202) 

482–0182, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Since the July 21, 2005, publication of 

the preliminary results in this review 

(see Notice of Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review: Furfuryl Alcohol from 

Thailand, 70 FR 42029 (July 21, 2005) 

(‘‘Preliminary Results’’)), the following 

events have occurred: 

We invited parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Results of the review. On 

August 22, 2005, the respondent, 

Indorama Chemicals (Thailand) Ltd. 

(‘‘IRCT’’), and the petitioner, Penn 

Specialty Chemicals, Inc. (‘‘petitioner’’), 

each filed case briefs. On August, 29, 

2005, the respondent and petitioner 

each filed rebuttal briefs. On October 27, 

2005, the Department rejected the 

petitioner’s case brief and IRCT’s 

rebuttal brief on the basis that these 

briefs contained new factual 

71086 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 226 / Friday, November 25, 2005 / Notices 

information. The deadline for 

submission of new factual information 

was October 20, 2004. On November 2, 

2005, the petitioner and IRCT each filed 

a new case brief and rebuttal brief, 

respectively, absent the information the 

Department deemed to be new 

information. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by this 

order is furfuryl alcohol 

(C4H3OCH2OH). Furfuryl alcohol is a 

primary alcohol, and is colorless or pale 

yellow in appearance. It is used in the 

manufacture of resins and as a wetting 

agent and solvent for coating resins, 

nitrocellulose, cellulose acetate, and 

other soluble dyes. 

The product subject to this order is 

classifiable under subheading 

2932.13.00 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States 

(‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS 

subheading is provided for convenience 

and customs purposes, our written 

description of the scope of this 

proceeding is dispositive. 

Period of Review 

The period of review is July 1, 2003, 

through June 30, 2004. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case brief filed 

by parties to this review are addressed 

in the ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for 2003–2004 

Administrative Review of Furfuryl 

Alcohol from Thailand’’ from Stephen J. 

Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Import Administration to Joseph A. 

Spetrini, Acting Assistant Secretary for 

Import Administration, dated November 

18, 2005 (‘‘Decision Memo’’), which is 

hereby adopted by this notice. Attached 

to this notice as an appendix is a list of 

the issues that parties have raised and 

to which we have responded in the 

Decision Memo. Parties can find a 

complete discussion of all issues raised 

in this review and the corresponding 

recommendations in this public 

memorandum, which is on file in the 

Department of Commerce’s (‘‘the 

Department’’) Central Records Unit, 

located in Room B–099 of the main 

Department building (‘‘CRU’’). In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Decision Memo can be accessed directly 

on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/ 

index.html. The paper copy and 

electronic version of the Decision Memo 

are identical in content. 

Fair Value Comparisons 

To determine whether sales of 

furfuryl alcohol by IRCT to the United 

States were made at less than normal 

value (‘‘NV’’), we compared export price 

(‘‘EP’’) to NV. Our calculations followed 

the methodologies described in the 

Preliminary Results, except as noted 

below and in the final results 

calculation memorandum cited below, 

which is on file in the CRU. 

Export Price 

We calculated EP in accordance with 

section 772(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (‘‘the Act’’), because the 

merchandise was sold to the first 

unaffiliated purchaser in the United 

States prior to importation by the 

exporter/producer outside the United 

States and because constructed export 

price methodology was not otherwise 

warranted. We calculated EP based on 

the same general methodology described 

in the Preliminary Results. 

Normal Value 

Except as noted below, we used the 

same methodology as that described in 

the Preliminary Results to determine the 

cost of production and the NV. As 

discussed in the Decision Memo, we 

used IRCT’s reported interest expense 

ratio in these final calculations. 

Changes from the Preliminary Results 

Based on our review of the comments 

received, we have made certain changes 

to the calculations for the final results. 

Specifically, we re–calculated the cost 

of manufacture, general and 

administrative expenses, duty drawback 

adjustment, and U.S. packing expense 

for the final results. These changes are 

discussed in the Decision Memo and in 

the final results calculation 

memorandum. See ‘‘Final Results 

Calculation Memorandum for Indorama 

Chemicals (Thailand) Ltd.,’’ dated 

November 18, 2005, which is on file in 

the CRU. 

Final Results of the Review 

We determine that the following 

margin percentage exists for the period 

July 1, 2003, through June 30, 2004: 

Exporter/manufacturer Weighted–average 

margin percentage 

Indorama Chemicals 

(Thailand) Ltd. ........... 0.00 

Assessment Rates 

The Department shall determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries. In 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

we have calculated exporter/importer 

(or customer)-specific assessment rates 

for merchandise subject to this review. 

To determine whether the duty 

assessment rate is de minimis, in 

accordance with the requirement set 

forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we 

calculated importer–specific (or 

customer–specific) ad valorem rates by 

aggregating the dumping margins 

calculated for all U.S. sales to that 

importer (or customer) and dividing this 

amount by the total value of the sales to 

that importer (or customer). Where an 

importer–specific (or customer–specific) 

ad valorem rate is greater than de 

minimis, we calculated a per–unit 

assessment rate by aggregating the 

dumping margins calculated for all U.S. 

sales to that importer (or customer) and 

dividing this amount by the total 

quantity sold to that importer (or 

customer). 

The Department will issue 

appropriate assessment instructions 

directly to CBP within 15 days of 

publication of these final results of 

review. 

Cash Deposit Rates 

The following antidumping duty 

deposits will be required on all 

shipments of furfuryl alcohol from 

Thailand entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption, effective 

on or after the publication date of the 

final results of this administrative 

review, as provided by section 751(a)(1) 

of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for 

the reviewed company will be the rate 

listed above (except no cash deposit will 

be required if a company’s weighted–

average margin is de minimis, i.e., less 

than 0.5 percent); (2) for previously 

reviewed or investigated companies not 

listed above, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company–specific 

rate published for the most recent 

period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 

covered in this review, the previous 

review, or the original investigation, but 

the manufacturer is, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate established for the 

most recent period for the manufacturer 

of the merchandise; and (4) if neither 

the exporter nor the manufacturer is a 

firm covered in this or any previous 

reviews, the cash deposit rate will be 

7.82 percent, the ‘‘all others’’ rate 

established in Furfuryl Alcohol from 

Thailand: Notice of Amended Final 

Antidumping Duty Determination and 

Order, 60 FR 38035 (July 25, 1995). 

These cash deposit requirements shall 

remain in effect until publication of the 

final results of the next administrative 

review. See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 226 / Friday, November 25, 2005 / Notices 71087 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to Administrative 

Protective Order (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanctions. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and this notice in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act. 

Dated: November 18, 2005. 

Joseph A. Spetrini, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

APPENDIX I 

List of Comments in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

Comment 1: Certain Loss Related to 

General and Administrative Expenses 

(Cost Adjustment #1) 

Comment 2: Changes in Inventory (Cost 

Adjustment #2) 

Comment 3: Cost Adjustment #3 

Comment 4: Financial Expenses 

Comment 5: Technical Services 

Adjustment 

Comment 6: Duty Drawback 

Comment 7: Packing Costs 

[FR Doc. 05–23281 Filed 11–23–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

[I.D. 111605E] 

Receipt of an Application for Incidental 

Take Permit 1554 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration, 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice; application for permit. 

SUMMARY: NMFS has received an 

application from the Washington 

Department of Fish and Wildlife 

(WDFW) for an incidental take permit 

pursuant to the Endangered Species Act 

of 1973, as amended (ESA). The 

duration of the proposed Permit is 10 

years. NMFS is furnishing this notice in 

order to allow other agencies and the 

public an opportunity to review and 

comment on the document. All 

comments received will become part of 

the public record and will be available 

for review pursuant to the ESA. 

DATES: Written comments from 

interested parties on the Permit 

application must be received at the 

appropriate address or fax number no 

later than 5 p.m. Pacific standard time 

on December 27, 2005. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments on the 

application should be sent to Kristine 

Petersen, Salmon Recovery Division, 

NWR1, 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 

1100, Portland, OR 97232. Comments 

may also be sent via fax to (503) 872–

2737. The mailbox address for providing 

e-mail comments is 

UCRFisheries.nwr@noaa.gov. Include in 

the subject line the following document 

identifier: ‘‘Upper Columbia fisheries’’. 

Requests for copies of the permit 

application should be directed to the 

Salmon Recovery Division, 1201 N.E. 

Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100, Portland, OR 

97232. The documents are also available 

on the Internet at www.nwr.noaa.gov/ 

1srd. Comments received will be 

available for public inspection, by 

appointment, during normal business 

hours by calling (503) 230–5409. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kristine Petersen, Portland, OR (ph: 

(503) 230–5409, fax: (503) 872–2737, email: kristine.petersen@noaa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 9 

of the ESA and Federal regulations 

prohibit the ‘‘taking’’ of a species listed 

as endangered or threatened. The term 

‘‘take’’ is defined under the ESA to 

mean harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, 

wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or 

to attempt to engage in any such 

conduct. NMFS may issue permits, 

under limited circumstances, to take 

listed species if such taking is incidental 

to, and not the purpose of, the carrying 

out of an otherwise lawful activity. 

NMFS regulations governing permits for 

threatened and endangered species are 

promulgated at 50 CFR 222.307. 

Species Covered in this Notice 

The following evolutionarily 

significant units (ESUs) are included in 

the Permit application: 

Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss): 

endangered Upper Columbia River 

(UCR). 

Chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha): 

endangered Upper Columbia River 

spring-run and threatened Snake River 

spring/summer-run. 

Application received: 

On September 21, 2005, the WDFW 

submitted an application to NMFS for 

an ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) permit for the 

incidental take of ESA-listed 

anadromous fish species associated with 

recreational fisheries on non-ESA-listed 

fish species in the middle and upper 

Columbia River Basin in Washington 

State. 

This notice is provided pursuant to 

section 10(c) of the ESA. NMFS will 

evaluate the application, associated 

documents, and comments submitted 

thereon to determine whether the 

application meets the requirements of 

section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA. If it is 

determined that the requirements are 

met, a permit will be issued to the 

WDFW for the purpose of carrying out 

the proposed fisheries. NMFS will 

publish a record of its final action in the 

Federal Register. 

Dated: November 21, 2005. 

Angela Somma, 

Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office 

of Protected Resources, National Marine 

Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. 05–23285 Filed 11–23–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

[I.D. 102705A] 

Marine Mammals; File No. 774–1649–03 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Issuance of permit amendment. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

Permit No. 774-1649-02 issued to the 

Southwest Fisheries Science Center, 

National Marine Fisheries Service, 8604 

La Jolla Shores Drive, La Jolla, 

California 92038 (Principle Investigator: 

Rennie Holt, Ph.D.) has been amended. 

ADDRESSES: The permit and related 

documents are available for review 

upon written request or by appointment 

in the following office(s): 

Permits and Documentation Division, 

Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 

1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, 

Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone 

(301)713–2289; fax (301)713–0376; and