alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. SMITH

No. 2 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 511.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 12 September 1977. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 12 September 1977.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Katy Industries,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony
T. Castor III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By  /s/ Anthony T. Castor III
  ---------------------------
Anthony T. Castor III
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 15, 2005

A signed original of this written statement or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
Katy Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Katy Industries, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       47
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 21, 2019

No. 04-19-00312-CV

Marcel MARTINEZ,

Appellant

v.

Jesse TORRES, Gold Standard Plumbing, LLC and Edy Jonathan Pech-Guamuch,

Appellees

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-17644

The Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was due June 14, 2019, but has not been filed. On June 18, 2019, 

the court reporter filed a notification of late record, requesting until August 19, 2019, to file the 

reporter’s record. After consideration, we GRANT IN PART the court reporter’s requested 

extension and ORDER the court reporter to file the reporter’s record in this court on or before 

July 15, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c) (providing that each extension to the deadline to file a

record may not exceed thirty days in ordinary or restricted appeals and ten days in accelerated 

appeals).

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of June, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
#### DANTZIC v. STATE

No. 15 PC.

Case below: 10 N.C. App. 369.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 6 April 1971 for sole purpose of determining whether or not Court of Appeals has authority to issue writ of error *coram nobis.*
Case 1:06-cv-15095-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15095-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15095-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15095-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15095-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15095-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15095-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15095-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15095-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15095-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15095-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15095-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15095-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 8 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 8-16 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 99(c)

EXHIBITS:                                                       May 23, 2000

Gordon Coplein, Esq.

       This letter serves to confirm that Kenilworth Systems Corporation
("Kenilworth" or the "Company") will cause to be issued to you, or your
designee, one hundred thousand (100,000) shares of its Common Stock, par value
$.01 per share as additional consideration for services you rendered and will
render as a consultant to the Company in connection with the research required
to file for patents, copyrights or other similar protection for Kenilworth's
"Play along with live casino table games" technology. The Company will pay all
disbursements and fees that may be charged by you or others that will assist or
actually file and prosecute the required documents.

       The shares to be issued will be duly and validly issued, fully paid and
non-assessable and will be issued as "Restricted Securities" as that term is
defined under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"),
pursuant to an exemption afforded under Section 4(2) of the Act.

       All corporate action necessary for the issuance for the shares has been
made. The Certificates represented by the Shares will be issued as promptly as
possible. Each certificate to be issued for the Shares will bear the following
legend:

              "The Shares represented by the certificates have not been
       registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Shares have
       been acquired for investment and may not be sold, transferred or assigned
       in the absence of an effective registration statement for the Shares
       under the Securities Act of 1933 or an opinion of the Company's counsel
       that registration is not required under the Act".

       If the aforementioned terms meet with your approval, please execute this
letter agreement and return a copy to us.


KENILWORTH SYSTEMS CORPORATION                ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

/s/ Herbert Lindo                             /s/ Gordon Coplein,Esq.
-------------------------                     -----------------------
Herbert Lindo, President                      Gordon Coplein, Esq.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS Oklahoma Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Nicoles, F.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### SIDDEN v. TALBERT

No. 121 PC.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 300.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 3 December 1974.
Case 1:06-cv-15081-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15081-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15081-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15081-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15081-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15081-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15081-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15081-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15081-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15081-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15081-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15081-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15081-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
**Exhibit32.2(a)**

CERTIFICATIONS OFTHE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICERUNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe filing by ARTISTdirect, Inc. (the “Registrant”) of its Annual Report onForm 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Annual Report”)with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Rene Rousselet, CorporateController of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           TheAnnual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in theAnnual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Registrant.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theRegistrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| Date:     April 30,  2007 | By:    | /s/ RENE ROUSSELET             |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                                                    |   | Rene Rousselet                 |
|                                                    |   | Corporate Controller           |
|                                                    |   | (Principal Accounting Officer) |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           Jun-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                             PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>               2,347,826
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>               327,330
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                    183,779
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                  199,753
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          3,058,688
<COMMON>                                  449,697
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                  (1,665)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                       412,890
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>            866,007
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                89,062
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                      934,767
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                          1,400
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>              63,513
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>          1,109,024
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>           3,058,688
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                 410,164
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                       22,366
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                322,835
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                345,201
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                    64,963
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                        (22,115)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>             42,848
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   33,851
<NET-INCOME>                                8,997
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                 1,914
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>               7,083
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                   50,136
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                  32,144
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                     73,042
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.11


</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-15086-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ETHAN W. RIPPEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 165 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
KOLLMORGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES                    EXHIBIT 27
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
     CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          12,798
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,098
<ALLOWANCES>                                       852
<INVENTORY>                                     28,124
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,337
<PP&E>                                         115,173
<DEPRECIATION>                                  85,793
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,279
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,313
<BONDS>                                         38,340
<COMMON>                                        26,902
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           22,625
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,329)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,279
<SALES>                                        161,071
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               166,971
<CGS>                                          106,982
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,885
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,243
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,511
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,511
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,511
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7116

TONY A. MCFARLIN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE TRENT, Warden, Mount Olive Correctional

Complex,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (CA-95-25-3)

Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: January 13, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony A. McFarlin, Appellant Pro Se. Scott E. Johnson, Dawn Ellen

Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Tony McFarlin seeks to appeal the district court's order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994)

(current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. McFarlin v. Trent, No. CA-95-25-3 (N.D.W. Va.

July 17, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568

(U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We further deny McFarlin's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1767 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1767

 To prohibit the manufacture for sale, offer for sale, distribution in 
commerce, or importation into the United States of any inclined sleeper 
                  for infants, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 10, 2019

Mr. Blumenthal introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the manufacture for sale, offer for sale, distribution in 
commerce, or importation into the United States of any inclined sleeper 
                  for infants, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Sleep Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SALE OF INCLINED SLEEPERS FOR INFANTS.

    (a) Prohibition on the Sale of Inclined Sleepers for Infants.--
Beginning on the date that is 180 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act, it shall be unlawful for any person to manufacture for sale, 
offer for sale, distribute in commerce, or import into the United 
States any inclined sleeper for infants.
    (b) Treatment of Violation.--A violation of subsection (a) shall be 
treated as a violation of section 19(a)(1) of the Consumer Product 
Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(1)).

SEC. 3. FUTURE CPSC ACTION.

    (a) In General.--The Consumer Product Safety Commission, in 
accordance with section 104 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement 
Act of 2008 (15 U.S.C. 2056a) may promulgate a consumer product safety 
standard for a product category intended, marketed, or designed to 
provide sleeping accommodations for an infant up to one year old only 
if such standard is consistent with safe sleep best practices as agreed 
upon by representatives of consumer groups, nationally recognized 
organization representing pediatricians, juvenile product 
manufacturers, and independent child product engineers and experts.
    (b) Interpretation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to 
prohibit the Consumer Product Safety Commission from promulgating, in 
accordance with section 104 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement 
Act of 2008 (15 U.S.C. 2056a), consumer product safety standards for 
products not intended, marketed or designed to provide sleeping 
accommodations for an infant up to one year old.

SEC. 4. DEFINITION.

    In this Act, the term ``inclined sleeper for infants'' means a 
product with an inclined sleep surface greater than ten degrees that is 
intended, marketed, or designed to provide sleeping accommodations for 
an infant up to one year old.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE v. WEST

No. 43 PC.

Case below: 21 N.C. App. 58.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 May 1974.
Case 1:06-cv-14849-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15022-AKH     Document 7      Filed 09/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**





We
      hereby
      consent to the inclusion in Platinum Group Metals Ltd.’s Annual Report on
      Form 40-F of our audit report dated November 16, 2007 relating to the
      consolidated financial statements for the year ended August 31, 2007 and the
      effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of August 31,
      2007.







*(signed)
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP*





**Chartered
      Accountants**


Vancouver,
      British Columbia





November
      16, 2007


PricewaterhouseCoopers
            refers to the Canadian firm of
            PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the other member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers
            International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal
            entity.
Case 1:07-cr-00332-HB Document 14 Filed 05/14/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cr-00332-HB Document 14 Filed 05/14/2008 Page 2 of 2