alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1633 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1633

 To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit employers to pay 
                    higher wages to their employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 23 (legislative day, May 22), 2019

 Mr. Rubio (for himself, Mr. Cornyn, and Mr. Barrasso) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit employers to pay 
                    higher wages to their employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rewarding Achievement and 
Incentivizing Successful Employees Act'' or the ``RAISE Act''.

SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF HIGHER WAGES.

    Section 9(a) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 159(a)) 
is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``(a)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) Notwithstanding a labor organization's exclusive 
representation of employees in a unit, or the terms and conditions of 
any collective bargaining contract or agreement then in effect, nothing 
in either--
            ``(A) paragraph (1) or (5) of section 8(a), or
            ``(B) a collective bargaining contract or agreement renewed 
        or entered into after the date of enactment of the RAISE Act,
shall prohibit an employer from paying an employee in the unit greater 
wages, pay, or other compensation for, or by reason of, his or her 
services as an employee of such employer, than provided for in such 
contract or agreement.''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 3 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 4 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 5 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 6 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 7 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 8 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 9 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 10 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 11 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 12 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 13 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 14 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 15 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 16 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 17 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 18 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 19 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 20 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 21 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 22 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 23 of 23
Case 1:06-cv-15108-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. GREEN

No. 215 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 574.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 September 1976.
Case 1:06-cv-15116-AKH Document 6 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-15116-AKH Document 6 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tigrent Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I, Anne M. Donoho, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ ANNE M. DONOHO Anne M. Donoho Chief Financial OfficerApril 15, 2010


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.28 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION** I, Jay A. Herman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Delphax Technologies Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Delphax Technologies Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis annual report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.        Dated:     December 7, 2005 By:  /s/ Jay A. Herman    Jay A. Herman    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Keane, Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Brian T. Keane,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)          the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

 
|                           | /s/ Brian T. Keane                    |   |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:  May 12, 2003 | Brian T. Keane                        |
|                           | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit23.1**

Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

ARTISTdirect, Inc.

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-122027, No.333-53208, No. 333-38104, No. 333-63572 and No. 333-68396) on Forms S-8 ofARTISTdirect, Inc., of our report dated March 30, 2006, except for Notes 1, 6,9, 14, 20, 21, and 22 as to which the date is March 15, 2007, with respectto the consolidated balance sheets of ARTISTdirect, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”)as of December 31, 2004 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity (deficiency) and cashflows for the years then ended, which report appears in the Annual Report onForm 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 of ARTISTdirect, Inc.
| /s/ GUMBINER SAVETT INC. |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|
|                     |   |
|                     |   |
| Santa Monica, California |   |
| April 19, 2007           |   |

 

----
#### STATE v. CLEARY

No. 6 PC.

Case below: 9 N.C. App. 189.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 October 1970.
#### STATE v. BATEMAN

No. 693P82.

Case below: 59 N.C. App. 738.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 28 January 1983.
Case 1:06-cv-14967-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03047-WHP Document 35 Filed 05/23/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03047-WHP Document 35 Filed 05/23/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-15153-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Argued and submitted February 5,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration March 10, 1999

#### OREGON OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH DIVISION, *Petitioner, v.*B & G EXCAVATING, *Respondent.*

(SH95176; CA A101912)

976 P2d 574

Jas. Jeffrey Adams, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

No appearance for respondent.

Before Warren, Senior Judge pro tempore, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*29PER CURIAM

The Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Division (OSHD) seeks remand of a decision by an administrative law judge (ALJ) in which she ruled, as a matter of law, that a supervisor’s knowledge of a serious violation of a state occupational safety rule could not be imputed to the supervisor’s employer for the purpose of the imposition of a penalty under ORS 654.086. The ALJ relied on our opinions in *OR-OSHA v. Tom O’Brien Construction Co., Inc.,*148 Or App 453, 941 P2d 550, *rev allowed*326 Or 151 (1997), and *OR-OSHA v. Don Whitaker Logging, Inc.,*148 Or App 464, 941 P2d 1025, *rev allowed*326 Or 151 (1997), for that proposition. Contrary to the ALJ’s understanding, we held in those cases that, when a supervisor commits a violation, OAR 437-001-0760(3)(c) does not *require*that the supervisor’s knowledge of that violation be imputed to the employer. Our holdings do not *preclude*the imputation of a supervisor’s knowledge of a violation to an employer under every circumstance.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

          - 12 CFR Part 627
          - RIN 3052-AC26

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Farm Credit Administration (FCA) published a final rule under part 627 on September 22, 2005 (70 FR 55513). This final rule gives certainty to Farm Credit System institutions regarding how the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation will treat qualifying participations and securitizations if the institution is subsequently placed in conservatorship or receivership. In accordance with 12 U.S.C. 2252, the effective date of the final rule is 30 days from the date of publication in the                         **Federal Register**                         during which either or both Houses of Congress are in session. Based on the records of the sessions of Congress, the effective date of the regulations is November 14, 2005.                    

# DATES:

The regulation amending 12 CFR part 627, published on September 22, 2005 (70 FR 55513) is effective November 14, 2005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert E. Donnelly, Senior Accountant, Office of Policy and Analysis, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA 22102-5090, (703) 883-4498, TTY (703) 883-4434; or Rebecca S. Orlich, Senior Attorney, Office of General Counsel, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA 22102-5090, (703) 883-4020, TTY (703) 883-4020.

(12 U.S.C. 2252(a)(9) and (10))

Dated: November 15, 2005.

Jeanette C. Brinkley,

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.

[FR Doc. 05-23001 Filed 11-18-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          298079
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5261554
<ALLOWANCES>                                    195298
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5939053
<PP&E>                                           52996
<DEPRECIATION>                                   12682
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6261246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7306746
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     753254
<COMMON>                                      40844296
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6261246
<SALES>                                       25421806
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              25475698
<CGS>                                         25843166
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 25843166
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              435042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (802510)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (802510)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 610318
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (192192)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
exv10w10






Exhibit 10.10




AMENDMENT TO THE

SEVERANCE PAY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF

DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.

AND PARTICIPATING DIVISIONS AND SUBSIDIARIES




     This amendment to the Severance Pay Plan for Employees of Dole Food Company, Inc. and
Participating Divisions and Subsidiaries, as amended and restated January 1, 2006 (the “Plan”), as
described below, is intended to clarify that the severance pay provided under the Plan will not
exceed the limits of the “separation pay” exception under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code
and IRS guidance thereunder and consequently will not be subject to the requirements of such
Section.




The changes in this amendment are effective January 1, 2005.




	1.	 	A new Section 1.3 is added to read as follows:
	 	 	 
	 	 	Section 1.3 Code Section 409A.






(a) The Plan is not intended to provide for any “deferral of compensation,” as defined
in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and authoritative IRS guidance thereunder.
Instead, the Plan is intended to fall within the exception for “separation pay due to
involuntary separation from service or participation in a window program,” as set forth in
Treasury Regulations section 1.409A-1(b)(9)(iii). The Plan shall be interpreted and
administered, to the extent possible, in accordance with these intentions.



(b) Accordingly, notwithstanding any other provision in this Plan, the Severance Pay
Benefit payable to an Eligible Employee pursuant to this Plan shall not exceed the amount
set forth in Treasury Regulations section 1.409A-1(b)(9)(iii)(A), or any successor
thereto, and the entire Severance Pay Benefit must be paid to an Eligible Employee no later
than the deadline set forth in Treasury Regulations section 1.409A-1(b)(9)(iii)(B), or any
successor thereto.




	2.	 	Section 3.1 (“Severance Pay Benefits Payable under the Plan”) is amended by modifying
subsection (e) to read, in its entirety, as follows:






(e) In no event shall the Severance Pay Benefit of any Eligible Employee exceed an amount
equal to a total of 104 weeks of Weekly Base Compensation, including any amount received
under subsection 3.1(a), (c), and/or (d).



Date: December 30, 2008



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Dole Food Company, Inc.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/
Sue Hagen
 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	Title:  	SVP HR
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1716 

To provide for the issuance of a ‘‘Gold Star Families Forever Stamp’’ to 

honor the sacrifices of families who have lost a loved one who was 

a member of the Armed Forces in combat. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2019 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself, Mr. MANCHIN, and Mrs. MURRAY) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for the issuance of a ‘‘Gold Star Families Forever 

Stamp’’ to honor the sacrifices of families who have 

lost a loved one who was a member of the Armed Forces 

in combat. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GOLD STAR FAMILIES FOREVER STAMP. 

4 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that— 

5 (1) Gold Star families are true national heroes, 

6 who deserve our deepest gratitude and respect; and 

7 (2) the extraordinary contribution of Gold Star 

8 families is beyond measure, not merely for their loss, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1716 IS

1 but the comfort they selflessly provide others and 

2 their model of service and sacrifice. 

3 (b) IN GENERAL.—In order to continue to honor the 

4 sacrifices of families who have lost a loved one who was 

5 a member of the Armed Forces in combat, the Postmaster 

6 General shall provide for the issuance of a forever stamp 

7 suitable for that purpose. 

8 (c) FOREVER STAMP DEFINED.—In this section, the 

9 term ‘‘forever stamp’’ means a definitive stamp that— 

10 (1) meets the postage required for first-class 

11 mail up to 1 ounce in weight; and 

12 (2) retains full validity for the purpose de13 scribed in paragraph (1) even if the rate of that 

14 postage is later increased. 

15 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The stamp described in sub16 section (b) shall be issued beginning as soon as practicable 

17 after the date of enactment of this Act and shall not there18 after be discontinued. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS