alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

-------------------------------------------------------x

In re

Kollel Mateh Efraim, LLC, a/k/a

Debtor 07cv3407 (GBD)

Kollel Mateh Efraim, LLC AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER

Appellant

Kollel Mateh Efraim, LLC

- against -

Helen-May Holdings, LLC

Appellee.

-------------------------------------------------------x

GEORGE B DANIELS, District Court Judge:

An appeal of the Order of the Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of New York

having been filed and both appellant and appellee having submitted their designation of record

on appeal; 

A Scheduling Order having been issued by this Court, dated May 1, 2007, ordering that

appellant’s memorandum of law in support of its appeal shall be submitted by July 11, 2007,

appellee’s opposition shall be submitted by August 8, 2007, and appellant’s reply shall be

submitted by September 5, 2007, it is hereby, 

ORDERED, that the Scheduling Order is Amended, and pursuant to the Amended

Scheduled Order, appellant’s memorandum of law in support of its appeal shall be submitted by

August 10, 2007, appellee’s opposition shall be submitted by September 10, 2007, and

appellant’s reply shall be submitted by October 10, 2007.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that when filing any papers with the Court, the parties shall

provide one courtesy copy to United States Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, Rm 410, New York,

New York 10007. 

Case 1:07-cv-03407-GBD Document 5-2 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

Dated: New York, New York

July , 2007

SO ORDERED

 

 

George B. Daniels, USDJ

Case 1:07-cv-03407-GBD Document 5-2 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-15053-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15053-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15053-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15053-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15053-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15053-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15053-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15053-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15053-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15053-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15053-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15053-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15053-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
#### Mel M MARIN, aka Mel M Marinkovic, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GARY’S TOWING; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-15174.

D.C. No. CV-02-00545-CKJ.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 2005.*

Decided April 4, 2005.

Mel M. Marin, San Diego, CA, pro se.

Lawrence E. Condit, Esq., Lawrence E. Condit, P.C., Daniel G. Knauss, AUSA, Nathan D. Leonardo, Esq., USTU—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Kristin A. Green, Esq., AGAZ—Office of the Arizona Attorney General (Tucson), Liability Management Section, Tucson, AZ, for Defendants—Appellees.

*161Before B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Mel M. Marin, aka Mel M. Marinkovie, appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment for Gary’s Tawing, Ruben Varalia and the United States in Marin’s action alleging that Defendants improperly towed his truck from the Davis-Monthan Air Force Base and detained it without his permission. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s September 26, 2003 order.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### RUCKER v. HOSPITAL

No. 40 PC.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 650.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 2 April 1974.
#### BOWLING v. COMBS

No. 73P83.

Case below: 60 N.C. App. 234.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 March 1983.
#### STATE v. JORDAN

No. 39 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 529.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 September 1976.
Case 1:06-cv-15042-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Katy Industries,
Inc. (the registrant) for the period ended March 31, 2007;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    [Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986 Section III.E];(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: August 17, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Amir RosenthalAmir RosenthalChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
 
                              BUFFTON CORPORATION
                              -------------------


                                  EXHIBIT 21



The following schedule lists the subsidiaries of Buffton Corporation as of
September 30, 1996:

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
Corporate Name                              Organization     Ownership Percent
--------------                              ------------     -----------------
<S>                                         <C>              <C>              
Buffton Corporation                           Delaware             Parent
 Summatronix, Inc.                            Delaware                100
   Current Technology, Inc.                   Delaware                100
 BFX Hospitality Group, Inc.                  Nevada                  100
   Main Street Realty, Inc.                   Nevada                  100
   American Food Classics, Inc.               Nevada                  100
     Lucile's Stateside Bistro-Texas, Inc.    Texas                   100
   BFX-LA, Inc.                               Louisiana               100
     Cat's Meow, Inc.                         Louisiana               100
     St. Louis & Bourbon E. C., Inc.          Louisiana               100
   Cabo-Shepherd, Inc.                        Texas                   100
   Cabo-Travis, Inc.                          Texas                   100
   Boutique Inns, Inc.                        Nevada                  100
     Stockyards Hotel, Inc.                   Texas                   100
</TABLE>
exv10w40









EXHIBIT 10.40




Handelsbanken




Undertaking concerning loan payment

— for purposes other than personal consumption




Branch

Frölunda




	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 

	 	 	Loan number
 	 
	 	Borrower

MOBITEC AKTIEBOLAG
 

	 	 	Customer number	 
	 




Provided that Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ)/Stadshypotek AB grants extension of the loan period,
at least the below amount must be amortised each...



Other terms for the loan remain unchanged




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	From

2010-03-31

	 	 	Amount

375,000
	 	 	SEK

X
	 	 	EUR
	 	 	From

2010-06-30
	 	 	Amount

500,000
	 	 	SEK

X
	 	 	EUR	 
	 





In addition to this, interest due must be paid each time the loan period is extended.





 Other comments
 







Automatic payment




	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Account number

	 	 	If an account number is stated, it implies an agreement
that amounts due are paid by the bank debiting the account
on the due date. The agreed due date will apply even if it
is not a business day. The borrower is responsible for the
required amount being available on the account on the due
date.	 
	 





Signature




	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Date

2009-06-16

	 	 	Signature of borrower

MOBITEC AB


/s/ Agne Axelsson	 
	 




Approval by guarantor and/or pledger who is
not the borrower if the amortisation plan is
changed




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Date

2009-06-16	 	 	Signature of borrower/pledger

DRI EUROPA AB


/s/ Agne Axelsson	 
	 	Date	 	 	Signature of borrower/pledger

	 
	 	Date	 	 	Signature of borrower/pledger

	 
	 	Date	 	 	Signature of borrower/pledger

	 
	 	Date	 	 	Signature of borrower/pledger

	 
	 	Signature of branch manager or

equivalent	 	 	The documentation is correct	 	 	The change has been registered for the loan	 
	 	 

	 	 	Date
	 	Signature
	 	 	Date
	 	 	Signature
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 215 (Tuesday, November 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67773-67774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22240]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority 285]


Delegation by the Deputy Secretary to the Director and the Deputy 
Director of the Office of Foreign Missions of Authority Regarding 
Certification Under the Internal Revenue Code

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State, 
including Section 1 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act, as 
amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), and delegated to the Deputy Secretary of 
State pursuant to Delegation of Authority 245 of April 23, 2001, I 
hereby delegate to the Director and Deputy Director of the Office of 
Foreign Missions the certification function vested in the Secretary of 
State by 26 U.S.C. 893(b) (section 893(b) of the Internal Revenue Code 
regarding the ``Compensation of employees of foreign governments or 
organizations'').

[[Page 67774]]

    Any function covered by this delegation may also be exercised by 
the Secretary of State, the Deputy Secretary of State or the Under 
Secretary for Management.
    Any act, executive order, regulation or procedure subject to, or 
affected by, this delegation shall be deemed to be such act, executive 
order, regulation, or procedures as amended from time to time.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: October 31, 2005.
Robert B. Zoellick,
Deputy Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05-22240 Filed 11-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Nicolina Gingliano, Respondent, against Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Appellant. State Industrial Commission, Respondent.

*Gingliano*v. *Lehigh Valley B. B. Co.,*185 App. Div.-, affirmed.

(Argued November 12, 1918;

decided November 26, 1918.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 11,-1918, affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant’s husband while employed as a laborer around the Buffalo terminal of the defendant railroad received burns from which he died. At the time of the happening of the accident the deceased was in a little shanty where coal oil or kerosene was stored. He had taken signal lamps into the shanty, and it is believed that while in the process of filling these his clothes caught on fire. The defendant contended that the character of the employment of the deceased at the time of his death was interstate, and that the state industrial commission, therefore, could not have jurisdiction of this claim. It was shown by claimant that the duties of the deceased employee were to keep the station premises clean, tend to the switch lamps in Scot street yards and pick up the waste paper; that the Scot street yards do not contain the main tracks but tracks branching off from the main line, and that no trains go into those *714yards directly but the cars are pushed in there by the yard engines.

*Thomas R. Wheeler*for appellant.

*Merton E. Lewis, Attorney-General (E. C. Aiken*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  balance sheets and statements of operations for Telos  Corporation
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000320121
<NAME>                        Telos Corporation
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                             408,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,522,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       739,000
<INVENTORY>                                      8,662,000 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,724,000
<PP&E>                                          38,480,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,159,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,251,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,451,000
<BONDS>                                         54,651,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           37,360,000
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            78,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (45,999,000)   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    95,251,000
<SALES>                                        101,736,000 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               207,086,000
<CGS>                                           93,153,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  182,915,000 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    39,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,555,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,068,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,103,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9,171,000) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9,171,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. MOORE

No. 161 PC.

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 388.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 14 July 1978.
`Exhibit 31(b)
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Alex Budzinsky, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Decorize, Inc., certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB/A of Decorize, Inc.;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
         statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
         to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
         such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
         covered by this report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
         information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
         material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
         cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
         this report; and

     4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
         establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
         defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the
         registrant and have:

                  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
                  that material information relating to the registrant,
                  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
                  by others within those entities, particularly during the
                  period in which this report is being prepared;

                  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
                  controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
                  the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

                  (c) presented in this report our conclusions about the
                  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based
                  on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
         on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
         audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons
         performing the equivalent functions):

                  (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
                  internal controls which could adversely affect the
                  registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
                  financial data and have identified for the registrant's
                  auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

                  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
                  management or other employees who have a significant role in
                  the registrant's internal controls; and


Date: December 5, 2003


/s/ Alex Budzinsky
-----------------------------------------
Alex Budzinsky
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)`
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 70782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23158]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Natapoc Ridge Forest Restoration Project, Okanogan-Wenatchee 
National Forests, Chelan County, WA

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Revised notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact 
statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 15, 2005, the USDA, Forest Service, Okanogan-
Wentachee National Forests, published a Notice of Intent in the Federal 
Register (70 FR 69308) to prepare an environmental impact statement 
(EIS) for the Natapoc Ridge Forest Restoration Project. The Notice of 
Intent is being revised to change the expected filing and review date 
of the draft environmental impact statement (EIS) to April 2006 and the 
final EIS to July 2006. The original Notice of Intent identified these 
dates incorrectly as April 2005 and July 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Willet, Natapoc Project Leader, 
USDA Forest Service, Wenatchee River Ranger District, 600 Sherbourne, 
Leavenworth, Washington 98826; phone (509) 548-6977, Ext. 288.

    Dated: November 16, 2005.
James L. Boynton,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 05-23158 Filed 11-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```
Case 1:07-cv-03413-LAP     Document 10      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03413-LAP     Document 10      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-15057-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. THOMPSON

No. 53 PC.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 416.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 November 1972.
#### BELL v. MARTIN

No. 62.

Reported: 299 N.C. 715.

Petition by plaintiff to rehear denied 3 June 1980.
EXHIBIT 23 ---- CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



    We  consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) of Intergraph Corporation and subsidiaries of
our  report dated January 31, 1996, included in the 1995  Annual
Report to Shareholders of Intergraph Corporation.

    Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of
Intergraph  Corporation listed in Item 14(a)(2).  This  schedule
is   the  responsibility  of  the  Company's  management.    Our
responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.  In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when  considered  in relation to the basic financial  statements
taken  as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects  the
information set forth herein.

    We  also  consent to the incorporation by reference  in  the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-25880) pertaining to the
Stock  Bonus  Plan dated December 22, 1988; in the  Registration
Statement  (Form S-8 No. 33-10614) pertaining to the  Intergraph
Corporation  Amended and Restated 1987 Employee  Stock  Purchase
Plan  dated  December  31, 1992; in the  Registration  Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-53849) pertaining to the Intergraph Corporation
1992  Stock  Option Plan dated May 27, 1994; in the Registration
Statement  (Form S-8 No. 33-57211) pertaining to the  Assumption
of  Options under the InterCAP Graphics Systems, Inc. 1989 Stock
Option  Plan  and 1994 Nonqualified Stock Option Program,  dated
January 10, 1995; and in the related Prospectuses, of our report
dated  January  31,  1996,  with  respect  to  the  consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Intergraph Corporation  and
subsidiaries included or incorporated by reference in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1995.


                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Birmingham, Alabama

March 20, 1996