alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

GARY T. MARGIOTTA,

Plaintiff, ELECTRONICALLY FILED

- against - Civil Case No.: 6:07-cv-00560

(DNH/GHL)

THE CITY OF GLOVERSVILLE, TIMOTHY HUGHES, 

both individually and as Mayor of the City of Gloversville, 

JAMES HANDY, both individually and as Councilman at 

Large of the City of Gloversville, CYNTHIA MOREY, 

both individually and as Councilwoman of the City of

Gloversville, LANCE GUNDERSEN, SR., both

individually and as Councilman of the City of Gloversville, 

LOU ANN WARREN, both individually and as 

Councilman of the City of Gloversville,

Defendants. 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record:

Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for:

Defendant The City of Gloversville

Defendant Timothy Hughes 

Defendant James Handy

Defendant Cynthia Morey

Defendant Lance Gundersen, Sr.

Defendant Lou Ann Warren

I certify that I am admitted to practice in this court.

DATED: June 12, 2007

Case 7:07-cv-03381-GAY Document 5 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 1 of 2
GIRVIN & FERLAZZO, P.C.

By: /S/ Gregg T. Johnson 

Gregg T. Johnson

Bar Roll No.: 506443

Attorneys for Defendants

Office and P.O. Address

20 Corporate Woods Blvd.

Albany, New York 12211

Tel: 518-462-0300

Fax: 518-462-5037

Email: gtj@girvinlaw.com

TO: Elmer Robert Keach III, Esq.

Bar Roll No.: 601537

LAW OFFICES OF ELMER ROBERT KEACH III, P.C.

Attorney for Plaintiff

1040 Riverfront Center

P.O. Box 70

Amsterdam, New York 12010

Tel: 518-434-1718

Fax: 518-770-1558

Email: bobkeach@keachlawfirm.com

Case 7:07-cv-03381-GAY Document 5 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 2      Filed 12/02/2004     Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. §1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (the “Company”)
on Form 40-F for the period ended August 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frank R. Hallam,
Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.









//signed//
              Frank
      R. Hallam
              Chief
      Financial Officer and Director
              December
      1, 2008
Case 1:06-cv-14990-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14990-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14990-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14990-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14990-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14990-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14990-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14990-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14990-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14990-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14990-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14990-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14990-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15118-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-15118-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-15118-AKH Document 8 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### AIRPORT AUTHORITY v. STEWART

No. 49 PC.

Case below: 9 N.C. App. 505.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 8 December 1970.
#### GOLDSTON v. CONCRETE WORKS

No. 234 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 717.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 September 1976.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GREGORY GARMONG,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

NEVADA SUPREME COURT; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 17

- 15715

D.C. No. 2:16

- cv

- 00718

- APG

- VCF

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 18, 2017 **

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Gregory Garmong appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law claims arising from state

court proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo a dismissal under the Rooker

- Feldman doctrine. No el v. Hall , 341 F.3d 1148,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Garmong’s request for oral

argument, set forth in the reply brief, is denied. 

# FILED

FEB 23 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 15715

1154 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Garmong’s action as barred by the

Rooker

- Feldman doctrine because Garmong’s ac tion is a “de facto appeal” of prior

state court judgment s, and raises claims that are “ine xtricably intertwined” with

those judgment s

. See Cooper v. Ramos , 704 F.3d 772, 782 (9th Cir. 2012)

( Rooker

- Feldman doctrine barred claim that was “inextricably intertwined” with

the state court’s decision); Henrichs v. Valley View Dev. , 474 F.3d 609, 616 (9th

Cir. 2007) ( Rooker

- Feldman doctrine barred plaintiff’ s claim because alleged legal

injur ies arose from the “state court’ s purportedly erroneous judgment” and the

relief sought “would require the district court to determine that the state court's

decision was wrong and thus void”)

.

AFFIRMED.
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 2 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 3 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 4 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 5 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 6 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 7 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 8 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 9 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 10 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 11 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 12 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 13 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 14 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 15 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 16 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 17 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 18 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 19 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 20 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 21 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 22 of 23
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 23 of 23
#### BANK v. BANK

No. 97 PC.

Case below: 8 N.C. App. 333.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 14 July 1970.
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB     Document 2      Filed 04/23/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB     Document 2      Filed 04/23/2007     Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99
                   WINTHROP PARTNERS 81 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                              DECEMBER 31, 1997

Supplementary Information Required Pursuant to Section 9.4 of the Partnership
Agreement (Unaudited)

                                        Three Months Ended       Year Ended
                                         December 31, 1997    December 31, 1997
                                        ------------------    -----------------

1.       Statement of Cash Available for Distribution:

Net (Loss) Income                             $(28,000)            $27,000
Add:     Depreciation and amortization
         charged to income not affecting
         cash available for distribution        12,000              48,000

         Minimum lease payments received,
         net of interest income earned,
         on leases accounted for under
         the financing method                   10,000              38,000

         Cash from reserves                     13,000                   -

Less:    Other noncash item                     (7,000)            (29,000)
         Cash to reserves                            -             (84,000)
                                               -------            --------

         Cash Available for Distribution       $     -            $      -
                                               =======            ========

2.       Fees and other compensation paid or accrued by the Partnership  to the
         General Partners, or their affiliates, during the three months ended
         December 31, 1997:

Entity Receiving                           Form of
Compensation                             Compensation                   Amount
----------------                         ------------                   ------

Winthrop
Management LLC                    Property Management Fees              $ 371

WFC Realty Co., Inc.
(Initial Limited Partner)         Interest in Cash Available
                                    for Distribution                    $   -
Case 1:07-cv-03355-LTS Document 7 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03355-LTS Document 7 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 2 of 2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.47 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### CARTER v. INSURANCE CO.

No. 279 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 520.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 October 1981.
Case 1:06-cv-14855-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03312-PAC Document 11-2 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03312-PAC Document 11-2 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03312-PAC Document 11-2 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03312-PAC Document 11-2 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03312-PAC Document 11-2 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT 15

                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



To Jacobson Stores Inc.:

We are aware that Jacobson Stores Inc. has incorporated by reference in its
Form S-8 Registration Statements File No. 2-88295 and File No. 033-53469 and
Form S-2 File No. 33-10532 its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 26,
1997, which includes our report dated May 9, 1997, covering the unaudited
interim condensed consolidated financial information contained therein.
Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not
considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by our
firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                               Very truly yours,



                                               /s/  Arthur Andersen LLP
                                               ------------------------


Detroit, Michigan
June 5, 1997
Case 1:06-cv-15135-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15135-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15135-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15135-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15135-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15135-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15135-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15135-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15135-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15135-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15135-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15135-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15135-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of ARTISTdirect, Inc. (the
Registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), I, Jonathan V. Diamond, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my best knowledge: (1) the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant. Date: May 13, 2004 /s/  Jonathan V. DiamondJonathan V. DiamondChief Executive Officer
#### HOUSE OF CHEESE v. BD. OF TRADE

No. 37 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 259.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 October 1976.
# L_2007337EN.01009001.xml

| 21.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 337/90 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 337/90

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1554/2007

of 20 December 2007

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007 of 14 September 2007 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale for export of sugar held by the intervention agencies of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007 of 14 September 2007 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale for export of sugar held by the intervention agencies of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 19 December 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 19 December 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 19 December 2007, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007 shall be 409,99 EUR/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 December 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 December 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1260/2007 (OJ L 283, 27.10.2007, p. 1). Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 will be replaced by Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1) as from 1 October 2008.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 242, 15.9.2007, p. 8.

2

---
#### STATE v. WALKER AND FLEEMAN

No. 69 PC.

Case below: 6 N.C. App. 447.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals on behalf of defendant Fleeman only denied 14 July 1970.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Katy Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending July 3, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James W. Shaffer, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ James W. Shaffer


James W. Shaffer


Chief Financial Officer


August 13, 2009











The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany this report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
 
                                  Exhibit 23.3

           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS


     We hereby consent to the reference to our firm in the Form 10-K of Barrett
Resources Corporation (the "Company") for the years ended December 31, 1998 and
1997, and the incorporation by reference thereof of our reserve review letter
reports into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-3
(File Nos. 333-51985 and 333-51461) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-29669, 333-
02529 and 333-29577).

                                NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
 

Dallas, Texas
March 15, 1999
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

$1,608.00 in U.S. Currency and 2008
Mazda, VIN 1YVHP80C385M37457, Appellant s

No. 06

- 14

- 00084

- CV v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 6th District Court of Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 83560 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal.

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 31, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk