alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ASHE v. MOTOR LINES

No. 125 PC.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 657.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 June 1975.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           3,803
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,235
<INVENTORY>                                     46,553
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,667
<PP&E>                                         155,485
<DEPRECIATION>                                  86,531
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 237,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,931
<BONDS>                                         76,336
<COMMON>                                        13,239
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   237,001
<SALES>                                        318,301
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               318,301
<CGS>                                          256,136
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  256,136
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   994
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,574
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,127
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,911
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,216
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,861
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,355
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-14861-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 19th day of October, 2007, I caused a copy of

Plaintiff’s Notice of Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Memorandum of Law in Support

its Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Appendix, the Declaration of Michael Lesser,

the Declaration of Charles Schrank, the Declaration of FTI (by Douglas E. Smith), the

Declaration of Karen Costa-Strachan, the Declaration of Lieven Nuytens, the Declaration

of Gerard Butler, the Declaration of Amy S. Manning, Esq., and Plaintiff’s Motion to

Seal Documents to be served upon the following counsel and Defendants in Medtech

Products Inc. v. Ranir, LLC, Civil Action No. 07 CV 3302 (KMK)(LMS), via overnight

mail postage-paid:

Ray Duane

7741 Broadwing Drive

North Las Vegas, NV 89084-2432

C.D.S. Associates, Inc.

2441 East Rockledge Road

Phoenix, AZ 85048-4308

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

By: s/ David Eklund

David Eklund

Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 82 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 73 Filed 03/07/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 73 Filed 03/07/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 73 Filed 03/07/2008 Page 3 of 3
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                 |                                |
|--------------|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|    |                            |                           |
|         |                                 | /s/ Stephen              Lerch |
|         | Stephen              Lerch           |
|         | Chief              Financial Officer |
|         |                                 |
|         |                                 |
|         | Date:                July 28, 2006   |
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-7 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-7 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
11. Statement re computation of per share earnings
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             Second Quarter Ended                     Six Months Ended
                                                                  March 31,                              March 31,
                                                           2000                1999               2000               1999
                                                           ----                ----               ----               ----

<S>                                                  <C>                 <C>                <C>                <C>
Net income in thousands                                    $4,826              $1,984             $8,336             $5,767

Weighted average shares outstanding
                                                        7,172,929           7,504,111          7,146,043          7,664,545
Assumed exercise of stock options,
weighted average of incremental shares
                                                          709,272             171,723            668,988            141,219
Assumed purchase of stock under stock
purchase plan, weighted average
                                                           33,407              19,488             23,694             13,760
                                                        ---------           ---------          ---------          ---------
Diluted shares - adjusted weighted-average
shares and assumed conversions                          7,915,608           7,695,322          7,838,725          7,819,524
                                                        =========           =========          =========          =========

Basic earning per share                                    $  .67              $  .26            $  1,17             $  .75
                                                           ======              ======            =======             ======

Diluted earnings per share                                 $  .61              $  .26            $  1.06             $  .74
                                                           ======              ======            =======             ======
</TABLE>
exv10w50






Exhibit 10.50




YYB Share Transfer Agreement




Party A: JJB




Party B: Liu Kai




Whereas YYB that is funded on the 13th July 1998 is solely hold by party A, with
registered capital of USD602,400 (RMB5million);




Whereas Party A is willing to transfer its 100% shareholding of YYB to party B, and Party B is
willing to take over YYB;




Whereas both parties fully understand its own rights and liabilities, risks in this transaction.
Both parties agree to conduct this share transfer in according to relevant laws and regulations.





	1.	 	Conditions for signing this agreement:






	1.1	 	party A transfers YYB’s 100% shareholding, all tangible
and intangible assets;






	1.2	 	party B is responsible for the debt liabilities as indicated in debt statement in appendix2;
other debts besides appendix 2 shall be taken by party A;






	1.3	 	party B shall pay the loans and interests at ICBC pledged by the plant facilities of No.245
Avenue Tumen, and land use right;






	2.	 	according to article 1 in this agreement, party A transfer 100% shareholding of YYB to party
B; party B agrees to take over party A’s 100% shareholding of YYB.






	3.	 	party A guarantees that the shares transferred to party B is legally owned by party A, and
party A has complete and efficient disposition right. Otherwise, party A shall take all the
economic and legal liabilities incurred by the disposition. Within one month upon signing this
agreement, party A shall deliver the qualification notary certificates for signing this
agreement to party B.






	4.	 	the payment method and time for party B to pay the debt listed in appendix 2 shall be agreed
between party B and various debtors. The payment method and time for party B to pay back the
bank loan and interests in total of RMB16million shall be agreed between party B and the bank.






	5.	 	Party A has reminded the fact that relevant real estate and land use right have been pledged
at the bank; party B completely noticed that fact this fact, and take the legal liability for
it.






	6.	 	upon signing this agreement, party A shall immediately pass YYB’s business license to party
B, and WOFE certificate and all relevant GMP and other licenses.




1









 












	7.	 	party B shall be responsible for relevant registration fee. Party a will assist in providing
relevant documents.






	8.	 	within 30 days upon signing this agreement, party A will be responsible for cancellation
registration of YYB as a subsidiary to the US public company.






	9.	 	once this agreement takes effect, either party breaches the agreement and prohibited the
share transfer, the default party shall pay the other party RMB2million fee. The default party
shall compensate the other party for its economic lose made by the default.





	 	 	 
	Party A: JJB 

Legal Representative: Xia YuanDa

	 	Party B: Liu Kai

Legal Representative: Liu Kai
	/s/ Xia YuanDa

	 	/s/ Liu Kai
	 

	 	 
	Date: June 25, 2009
	 	 






2
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Biomet, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-65139, 333-00331, 33-26826, 33-75618,
33-65700, 33-50268, 33-37561, 33-26826 and 33-7361) and on Form S-3 (File Nos.
33-50420 and 33-27008) and in the related Prospectus of our report dated July 3,
1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of Biomet, Inc. and subsidiaries at May 31, 1999 and 1998,
and for each of the three years in the period ended May 31, 1999, which report
is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                                  /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


South Bend, Indiana
July 27, 1999
#### STATE v. WATSON

No. 109 PC.

Case below: 21 N.C. App. 374.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 July 1974.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (IDENTIFY
SPECIFIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              11
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      825
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1
<INVENTORY>                                      3,639
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,871
<PP&E>                                           2,507
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,191
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,239
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,258
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,906
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,055
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,239
<SALES>                                          1,167
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,167
<CGS>                                              870
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     1
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  38
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (45)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (45)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (45)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
MICHAEL J. GARCIA

United States Attorney for the 

Southern District of New York

By: LARA K. ESHKENAZI

Assistant United States Attorney

86 Chambers Street, 3rd Floor

New York, New York 10007

Tel.: (212) 637-2758 

Fax: (212) 637-2702

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------- x

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND

EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,

Defendant.

07 Civ. 3378 (GEL)

ECF CASE

NOTICE OF MOTION

------------------------------------------------------------- x

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the Declarations of J. Bryan Howell and Darlene

Hall, the exhibits attached thereto, the accompanying memorandum of law, and all prior pleadings

and proceedings herein, defendant United States Department of Housing and Urban Development

(the “Government”), by its attorney Michael J. Garcia, United States Attorney for the Southern

District of New York, shall move this Court, before the Honorable Gerard E. Lynch, United States

District Judge, in the United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York, for

partial summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. 

Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 16 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to pursuant to Local Civil Rule

6.1, answering papers, if any, are to be served no later than August 30, 2007, and the

Government’s reply, if any, shall be served no later than five (5) business days thereafter.

Dated: New York, New York

August 16, 2007

MICHAEL J. GARCIA

United States Attorney for the

Southern District of New York

Attorney for Defendant

By: /s/ Lara K. Eshkenazi 

LARA K. ESHKENAZI

Assistant United States Attorney

86 Chambers Street, 4 Floor th

New York, New York 10007

Tel. No.: (212) 637-2758

Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 16 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1534 

To require the Secretary of Defense to conduct an assessment of quantum 

computing technology to address problems associated with exposure to 

PFAS, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2019 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Ms. ERNST) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Defense to conduct an assessment of quantum computing technology to address problems associated with exposure to PFAS, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ASSESSMENT OF QUANTUM COMPUTING TECH4 NOLOGY TO ADDRESS PFAS EXPOSURE. 

5 (a) ASSESSMENT REQUIRED.—Not later than one 

6 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec7 retary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of 

8 Defense for Research and Engineering and in consultation 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1534 IS

1 with the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations, 

2 Environment, and Energy, shall complete an assessment 

3 of quantum computing and how it may be used to address 

4 problems associated with exposure to PFAS. 

5 (b) ELEMENTS.—The assessment required by sub6 section (a) shall include the following: 

7 (1) Analysis of the potential of hybrid quantum 

8 classical computing to utilize the unique attributes 

9 of such computing for addressing issues of chemical 

10 contamination such as that caused by PFAS. 

11 (2) Assessment of the potential of quantum 

12 computing to address problems of exposure to 

13 PFAS, to remediate solutions, and to develop alter14 natives to PFAS for materials that otherwise con15 tain PFAS. 

16 (3) An inventory of the existing and potential 

17 work on exposure to PFAS and possible partnership 

18 opportunities with academic institutions, private sec19 tor technology and chemical companies, and other 

20 Federal and State government entities. 

21 (4) Assessment of the availability of current 

22 and near-term quantum computing resources such 

23 as cloud based quantum systems, as well as a road24 map for long-term quantum development. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1534 IS

1 (5) An assessment of the current quantum com2 puting efforts of the Department and how each ex3 isting quantum computing effort may assist or serve 

4 as a model for the Department. 

5 (6) A description of the amount of funding that 

6 would be required to take initial steps to leverage 

7 near term quantum computing to address problems 

8 relating to exposure to PFAS. 

9 (c) PFAS DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

10 ‘‘PFAS’’ means the group of chemicals known as ‘‘per11 and polyfluoroalkyl substances’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### STATE v. CREECH

No. 59.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 261.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 29 August 1978.
#### DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION v. PELHAM

No. 4PC

No. 120 (Spring Term)

Case below: 50 N.C. App.212

Petition by Dept, of Transportation for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 4 March 1981.
#### STATE v. ALLEN

Case No. 73PC

Case below: 50 NC App 173

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 7 April 1981.
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-18-00075-CR 

AARON MICHAEL FRANKS, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the County Court 

Deaf Smith County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2017-0010, Honorable D.J. Wagner, Presiding 

 

August 17, 2018 

 

ORDER 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ. 

Pending before this court is appellant Aaron Michael Franks’ Motion for 

Reinstatement. We dismissed this appeal for want of prosecution on July 31, 2018,

because appellant failed to pay for the appellate record after the trial court found he was 

not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). Appellant 

has now paid for the clerk’s and reporter’s records and seeks to reinstate the appeal. 

Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion, vacate the dismissal, and restore the appeal to 

the court’s docket.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

** Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

I, Michael J. Koss, Chief Executive Officer of Koss Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:

 

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Michael J. Koss                          |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   | Michael J. Koss                              |
|   | Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief |
|   | Operating Officer                            |
|   | Date: January 28, 2011                  |

 

 

Note:  This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

----
Case 1:06-cv-15145-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03377-CM Document 7 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03377-CM Document 7 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03379-RWS     Document 5      Filed 09/28/2007     Page 1 of 1
#### IN RE DEW

No. 16 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 232.

Petition by petitioner for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 1978.
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 15 Filed 01/18/2005 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 15 Filed 01/18/2005 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. ASHE

No. 9 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 74.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 September 1976.