alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 163 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.163

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen

                                 An Act

 
   To prevent catastrophic failure or shutdown of remote diesel power 
    engines due to emission control devices, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Alaska Remote Generator Reliability 
and Protection Act''.
SEC. 2. REVISION OF REGULATIONS REQUIRED.
    (a) In General.--The Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
Agency shall revise section 60.4216(c) of title 40, Code of Federal 
Regulations (as in effect on the date of enactment of this Act), by 
striking ``that was not certified'' and all that follows through 
``compared to engine-out emissions'' and inserting ``must have that 
engine certified as meeting at least Tier 3 PM standards''.
    (b) Emissions and Energy Reliability Study.--Not later than 1 year 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency, in consultation with the Secretary of 
Energy, shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of 
Representatives a report assessing options for the Federal Government 
to assist remote areas in the State of Alaska in meeting the energy 
needs of those areas in an affordable and reliable manner using--
        (1) existing emissions control technology; or
        (2) other technology that achieves emissions reductions similar 
    to the technology described in paragraph (1).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Biomet, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-65139, 333-00331, 33-75618, 33-65700,
33-50268, 33-37561, 33-26826 and 33-7361), on Form S-4 (File No. 333-88905) and
on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-50420, 33-27008 and 333-94959) and in the related
prospectus of our report dated July 1, 2002, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Biomet, Inc. and its
subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended May
31, 2002.

                                                  Ernst & Young LLP

Fort Wayne, Indiana
August 14, 2002
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6585

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

ALBERT CHARLES BURGESS, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior 

District Judge. (1:09-cr-00017-GCM-DLH-1; 1:12-cv-00375-GCM) 

Submitted: July 23, 2015 Decided: July 28, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard 

Ascik, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Asheville, North Carolina; Kimlani M. Ford, Cortney Randall, 

Edward R. Ryan, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charlotte, 

North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion seeking an extension of time to file a 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. On appeal, we confine our review to 

the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). 

Because Burgess’ informal briefs do not challenge the basis for 

the district court’s disposition, Burgess has forfeited appellate 

review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
#### HARRISON v. LEWIS

No. 57.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 26.

Motion of defendant to withdraw appeal allowed 22 September 1972.
#### HAMILTON v. HAMILTON

No. 204 PC.

No. 99 (Fall Term).

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 755.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 29 August 1978.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>


<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>            DEC-31-1999

<CASH>                           5,589,641
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                       25,788
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 5,615,429
<PP&E>                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   5,615,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               22,554
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                       5,592,875
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     5,615,429
<SALES>                          6,941,998
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 7,326,484
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    4,059,816
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   659,941
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               3,773,184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (1,166,457)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (1,152,443)
<DISCONTINUED>                  31,131,464
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 16,821,666
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                    46,800,687
<EPS-BASIC>                       337.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                       337.44




</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-15121-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1785 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to exclude authorized generic 

drugs from calculation of the average manufacturer price for purposes 

of the Medicaid drug rebate program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2019 

Ms. HASSAN (for herself, Mr. CASSIDY, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. 

CARDIN, and Mr. YOUNG) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to exclude 

authorized generic drugs from calculation of the average 

manufacturer price for purposes of the Medicaid drug 

rebate program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair and Accurate 

5 Medicaid Pricing Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘Fair AMP Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1785 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUDING AUTHORIZED GENERIC DRUGS FROM 

2 CALCULATION OF AVERAGE MANUFACTURER 

3 PRICE UNDER THE MEDICAID DRUG REBATE 

4 PROGRAM; EXCLUDING MANUFACTURERS 

5 FROM DEFINITION OF WHOLESALER. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (C) of section 

7 1927(k)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r– 

8 8(k)(1)) is amended— 

9 (1) in the subparagraph heading, by striking 

10 ‘‘INCLUSION’’ and inserting ‘‘EXCLUSION’’; 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘a new drug application’’ and 

12 inserting ‘‘the manufacturer’s new drug applica13 tion’’; and 

14 (3) by striking ‘‘inclusive’’ and inserting ‘‘exclu15 sive’’. 

16 (b) EXCLUDING MANUFACTURERS FROM DEFINI17 TION OF WHOLESALER.—Section 1927(k)(11) of the So18 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–8(k)(11)) is amend19 ed— 

20 (1) by striking ‘‘manufacturers,’’; and 

21 (2) by striking ‘‘manufacturer’s and’’. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall take effect on the first day of the first 

24 fiscal quarter that begins after the date of enactment of 

25 this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

*Summary:*                     Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and  the regulations promulgated by the Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR Part 1505.2), the Department of the Interior, National Park Service has prepared and approved a Record of Decision for the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Final SEIS) for Elwha River ecosystem restoration at Olympic National Park. The Final SEIS supplements the 1996 implementation EIS, and will serve as a blueprint in guiding implementation of the Elwhat River ecosystem restoration initiative as called for in the 1992 Elwha River Ecosystem and Fisheries Restoration Act. The Environmental Protection Agency's                     **Federal Register**                     published notification of the filing of the Final EIS on September 2, 2005.                

*Decision:*                     As soon as practical Olympic National Park will begin to implement the restoration strategies, mitigations, and projects identified and analyzed as the Preferred Alternative contained in the Final SEIS. This course of action and alternative options were addressed in the Final and Draft SEIS (the availability of the latter for public review was announced  in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 16, 2004). The full range of foreseeable environmental consequences were assessed, and appropriate mitigation measures identified. Both a No Action alternative and  “environmentally preferred” options were identified and analyzed.                

*Copies:*                     Interested parties desiring to review the Record of Decision may obtain a copy by contacting the Superintendent, Olympic National Park, 600 East Park Ave., Port Angeles, WA 98362; or via telephone request at (360) 565-3000.                

Dated: October 21, 2005.

Jonathan B. Jarvis,

Regional Director, Pacific West Region.

[FR Doc. 05-23398  Filed 11-28-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4312-KS-M
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 10



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-56878) on Form F-3 of Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd of our
report dated March 13, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2001 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive income (loss), shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, and our report dated
March 13, 2003, with respect to the balance sheets of Silicon Manufacturing
Partners Pte Ltd as of December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, and the related profit
and loss accounts, statements of changes in equity and cash flows for the three
years ended December 31, 2002, which reports appear in the December 31, 2002
annual report on Form 20-F of Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd.





KPMG
Singapore


March 13, 2003
#### STATE v. BRYANT

No. 135 PC.

Case below: 19 N.C. App. 55.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 26 June 1975.
Case 1:07-cv-03355-LTS Document 15 Filed 05/15/2007 Page 1 of 1
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 50242 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
FERNANDO BARRAZA

- REVELES , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:13

- CR

- 1106

- 1

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Fernando Barraza

Reveles has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Barraza

- Reveles h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 14, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-50242 Document: 00513758729 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/14/2016No. 16

- 50242

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-50242 Document: 00513758729 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/14/2016
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.4 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Soldier Accounted For From Korean War (Hiltibran, C.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 26 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 1 of 11Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 26 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 2 of 11Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 26 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 3 of 11Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 26 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 4 of 11Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 26 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 5 of 11Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 26 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 6 of 11Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 26 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 7 of 11Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 26 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 8 of 11Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 26 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 9 of 11Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 26 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 10 of 11Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 26 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 11 of 11
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

-againstJAMES CUTLER, 

Defendant. 

No. 02-CR-441 (LAP) 

ORDER 

LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: 

The Court is in receipt of the Government’s letters of 

August 20, 2021. (See dkt. nos. 437 & 438.) Mr. Cutler may 

respond no later than September 3, 2021. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 23, 2021 

New York, New York 

 __________________________________ 

 LORETTA A. PRESKA 

 Senior United States District Judge 

Case 1:02-cr-00441-LAP Document 439 Filed 08/23/21 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ Michael R. StanfieldName:
    Michael R. StanfieldTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Intersections Inc. and will be retained by Intersections Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.