alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET/INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0                  43,219
<SECURITIES>                                         0                  30,242
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                 102,564
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                 154,655
<PP&E>                                               0                  41,862
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                  28,286
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 251,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                  44,220
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                   6,917
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                 194,423
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 251,343
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               136,769                 504,500
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  123,791                 457,565
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   300                     741
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 151                     601
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,464                  48,269
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,939                  20,563
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,525                  27,705
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11                     .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11                     .40
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. CURRY

No. 90 PC.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 291.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 May 1975.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of HEI, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
J. Nesbit, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                    /s/ Douglas J. Nesbit
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Douglas J. Nesbit
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    December 16, 2003
Case 1:06-cv-15040-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15063-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

No. 97-6710

FENCEL O'HARA MARTIN, a/k/a

Festus,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.

J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge.

(CR-88-76-N, CA-97-410-2)

Submitted: July 30, 1998

Decided: August 19, 1998

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Robert Edward Frank, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Charles Dee

Griffith, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

Appellant's conviction became final in 1990. On April 23, 1997,

Appellant filed his § 2255 motion. The district court denied relief

because Appellant filed his motion outside the one-year limitation

period imposed by § 2255. Pursuant to our recent decision in Brown

v. Angelone, ___ F.3d ___, Nos. 96-7173, 96-7208, 1998 WL 389030

(4th Cir. July 14, 1998), Appellant had until April 23, 1997 to file a

timely motion. Appellant's § 2255 motion was therefore timely.

Accordingly, we grant a certificate of appealability on this issue,

vacate the district court's order, and remand this case for consideration on the merits. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

 2
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of K-tel International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Philip Kives, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| By                                   |        /s/ PHILIP  KIVES |   |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Philip Kives                         |                                                        |
| *Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,* |                                                        |
| *President and Director*             |                                                        |
| September 18, 2006                   |                                                        |

 

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Recent News & Stories             
  -  News Releases             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.17 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

MARK CASHMAN AND CIRO AIELLO, 

Individually and On Behalf All Others 

Similarly Situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MENU FOODS MIDWEST 

CORPORATION, et al., 

 Defendants. 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-03236-JSR 

RULE 7.1 CORPORATE 

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and to enable judges and magistrate 

judges of the Court to evaluate possible disqualification or recusal, the undersigned counsel for 

Defendants The Procter & Gamble Company (“Procter & Gamble”) and The Iams Company 

(“Iams”) state that Procter & Gamble is a publicly traded corporation and Iams is a whollyowned subsidiary of Procter & Gamble. No other publicly held corporation owns 10% or more 

of the stock of Procter & Gamble or Iams. 

Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 5-2 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 3
 

Dated: New York, New York 

 June 29, 2007 

 

GIBBONS P.C. 

One Penn Plaza, 37th Floor 

New York, New York 10119 

(212) 649-4700 

Attorneys for Defendants 

The Procter & Gamble Company and 

The Iams Company 

By: /s Kim M. Catullo________

 Kim M. Catullo (KC-2390) 

 Allison B. Neidoff (AN6716) 

Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 5-2 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 3
 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on the 29th day of June, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing 

Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement of The Iams Company and The Procter & Gamble 

Company with the Clerk of Courts using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of 

such filing to CM/ECF participants, and I hereby certify that I have mailed by United States 

Postal Service the document to the non-CM/ECF participants: 

Gregory Mark Nespole 

Martin E. Restituyo 

WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER 

FREEMAN & HERZ LLP 

270 Madison Avenue 

New York, NY 10016 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Mark Cashman and Ciro Aiello 

and I hereby certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service the document to the 

following non-CM/ECF participants: 

Carolyn A. Dizon, Esq. 

DLA Piper 

1251 Avenue of the Americans 

New York, NY 10020-1104 

Counsel for the Menu Foods 

Defendants 

Megan S. Wynne, Esq. 

Morris Polich & Purdy 

1055 W. Seventh Street, 24th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90017-2503 

Counsel for Defendant 

Chem Nutra Inc. 

 /s Kim M. Catullo

 Kim M. Catullo 

Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 5-2 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 3 of 3
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Annual Report of Brek Energy Corporation (“Brek”) on Form
      10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard N. Jeffs,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of Brek and a member of the Board of
      Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of the Company.








*/s/
      Richard N. Jeffs*


Richard
      N. Jeffs


Chief
      Executive Officer




October
      31, 2005






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Annual Report of Brek Energy Corporation (“Brek”) on Form
      10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard n. Jeffs,
      Chief Financial Officer of Brek and a member of the Board of Directors, certify,
      pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of the Company.








*/s/
      Richard N. Jeffs*


Richard
      N. Jeffs


Chief
      Financial Officer






October
      31, 2005
Case 1:06-cv-15146-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
KOLLMORGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES                   EXHIBIT 27
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED
      IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>        
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS      
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                            14,096 
<SECURITIES>                           0 
<RECEIVABLES>                     39,895 
<ALLOWANCES>                         586 
<INVENTORY>                       29,634 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  92,136 
<PP&E>                           111,913 
<DEPRECIATION>                   (84,235)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   138,965 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             63,273 
<BONDS>                                0 
<COMMON>                          26,912 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0 
<PREFERRED>                            0 
<OTHER-SE>                       (10,591)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     138,965 
<SALES>                          157,424 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 169,658 
<CGS>                            105,334 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    112,749 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  47,881 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 4,192 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    5,681 
<INCOME-TAX>                           0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                5,681 
<DISCONTINUED>                         0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0 
<CHANGES>                              0 
<NET-INCOME>                       5,681 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       0.54 
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.54 
        



</TABLE>
#### MAXWELL v. WOODS

No. 380PC

Case below: 47 N.C. App. 495

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 October 1980.
Case 1:06-cv-15104-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-15104-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-15104-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-15104-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-15104-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-15104-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-15104-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-15104-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-15104-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-15104-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-15104-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-15104-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-15104-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-15104-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 14 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-15104-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 15 of 15
#### POULTRY INDUSTRIES v. CLAYTON, COMR. OF REVENUE

No. 29 PC.

Case below: 9 N.C. App. 345.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 December 1970.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 22



                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       LOCATION OF INCORPORATION       PERCENT
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT              OR ORGANIZATION           OWNERSHIP
---------------------------------      -------------------------      ----------
<S>                                             <C>                      <C>
                                                                      
American Azide Corporation                      Nevada                   100%
                                                                      
AMPAC Development Company                       Nevada                   100%
                                                                      
AMPAC Development Company of Utah               Utah                     100%
                                                                      
AMPAC Technologies Corporation                  Nevada                   100%
                                                                      
Halotron, Inc.                                  Nevada                   100%
                                                                      
Pacific Engineering & Production                                      
Co. of Nevada                                   Nevada                   100%
                                                                      
PEPCON Production, Inc.                         Utah                     100%
                                                                      
PEPCON Systems, Inc.                            Nevada                   100%
                                                                      
Western Electrochemical Company                 Delaware                 100%
                                                                      
AMPAC Farms, Inc.                               Nevada                   100%
                                                                      
AMPAC Chemicals Corporation                     Nevada                   100%
                                                                      
Sun Country Homes, Inc.                         California               100%
</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-14855-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14855-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14855-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14855-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14855-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14855-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14855-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14855-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14855-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14855-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14855-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14855-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14855-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
#### Albert E. Duryea, as Executor of Eliza F. Duryea, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Jennie M. Knapp, as Administratrix of the Estate of Jane A. Conklin, Deceased, Respondent, Impleaded with Another. Same, Appellant, *v.*Same, Respondent. Same, Appellant, *v.*Same, Respondent. Mabel D. Polhemus, Appellant, *v.*Jennie M. Knapp, as Administratrix of the Estate of Jane A. Conklin, Deceased, Respondent, Impleaded with Another.

(Submitted June 10, 1918;

decided June 14, 1918.)

Motion to amend remittitur denied, without costs. (See 223 N. Y. 643.)
#### STATE v. EDWARDS

No. 63.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 718.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 1 November 1972.
#### BRITT v. BRITT

No. 186 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 132.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 27 August 1975. Appeal dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question 27 August 1975.
Case 1:07-cv-03312-PAC Document 5 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03312-PAC Document 5 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 2 of 2