alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary license has been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984, as amended by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515. License No.
Name/Address
Date reissued004286NF
Joseph Esposito, dba Mondo Comm., International Ltd., 17 Main Street, Bloomingdale, NJ 07403.
September 25, 2005.
 Dated: November 10, 2005. Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Consumer Complaints and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 05-22746 Filed 11-15-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

ii .,.>.- !. 

I i 

L,.uL, 3: . --!I 

1: -~\ +,.1-,,2 :;ii,~,s;-): ,I i;. *i 2.. -I$--~I-o~ -- \! ! ' 

--.." ~.. ^."_.I.._ --- -' 

-_, 1'- -~.. 

.. 

IN RE: Fosamax Products Liability : 

Litigation 

1: 06-md-1789 (JFK) 

Order -------------------------------.--- X 

This Document Relates to: All Actions : 

--------.-----------------------.-- X 

JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District Judge: 

The Plaintiff's Steering Committee ("PSC") has 

requested an evidentiary hearing in advance of oral argument on 

the class certification motions that are currently pending before 

the Court. For the reasons discussed below, the PSC's request is 

DENIED. 

In determining whether to certify a class, a court must 

resolve any factual disputes relevant to each requirement of 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. In re Initial Public Offerinq 

Securities Litiqation, 471 F.3d 24, 41 (2d Cir. 2006). In 

connection with the instant class certification motion, the 

parties have created and the Court has reviewed an extensive 

evidentiary record. This record consists of the expert 

affidavits of plaintiff's dental experts, Robert E. Marx, D.D.S 

and Alistair N. Goss, D.D.Sc; plaintiff's claims administration 

expert Paul Mulholland, C.P.A., C.V.A.; defendant's medical 

expert, John Bilezikian, M.D.; defendant's expert Jeri W. Nieves, 

PH.D., an epidemiologist who specializes in osteoporosis; 

Case 1:07-cv-03295-JFK Document 11 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 2
defendant's oral and maxillofacial expert Robert S. Glickman, 

D.M.D.; and defendant's chemistry expert, Paul A. Bartlett. The 

parties have also submitted excerpts from the deposition 

transcripts of several of these experts; the interrogatory 

responses, deposition transcripts and plaintiff profile forms 

("PPF's") of the three putative class representatives, Mr. Trent 

Nichols, Jr., M.D., Ms. Aline Trahan, and Ms. Greta V. Murphy; an 

August 2004 post-marketing safety review from the FDA's Office of 

Drug Safety; and an FDA report showing the number of cases in 

which doctors reported adverse drug experiences associated with 

Fosamax in 1996. The parties have also brought to the Court's 

attention over forty articles and chapters from the oral and 

maxiilofacial, medical and dental scientific literature 

discussing osteonecrosis of the jaw ("ONJ") and its causes, 

diagnosis, treatment and relationship to oral bisphosphonates 

such as Fosamax. 

This record provides a sufficient factual basis to 

determine whether plaintiffs' motlons meet Rule 23's requirements 

and an evidentiary hearing will not be necessary. Accordingly, 

the PSC's request is denied. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: &2~Ccy~ 3 / ' G(? 7 

/ 

( JOHN F. KEENAN 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03295-JFK Document 11 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-15114-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1543 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that floor plan 

financing includes the financing of certain trailers and campers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 20, 2019 

Ms. ERNST (for herself and Mr. KING) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

that floor plan financing includes the financing of certain 

trailers and campers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Travel Trailer and 

5 Camper Tax Parity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FLOOR PLAN FINANCING APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN 

7 TRAILERS AND CAMPERS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 163(j)(9)(C) of the Inter9 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 

10 end the following new flush sentence: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1543 IS

1 ‘‘Such term shall also include any trailer or 

2 camper which is designed to provide temporary 

3 living quarters for recreational, camping, or 

4 seasonal use and is designed to be towed by, or 

5 affixed to, a motor vehicle.’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

8 December 31, 2017. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC
Form 10Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                         6778000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4123000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     35000
<INVENTORY>                                    3469000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              15435000
<PP&E>                                         5782000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5503000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                21482000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6771000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        692000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  21482000
<SALES>                                       13559000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              13559000
<CGS>                                         12585000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 14111000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               53000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  91000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     38000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              53000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     53000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of ISA Internationale Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed
 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Bernard L. Brodkorb, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
in the capacities and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1.) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the
periods presented.


By: /s/ Bernard L. Brodkorb
Bernard L. Brodkorb,
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: September 29, 2011

Note: This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the 10-K as a
separate disclosure statement.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff per request.
Argued and submitted May 27, 1998,

appeal dismissed April 14, 1999

#### MARK D. EAMES, *Appellant, v.*Dan JOHNSON, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, *Respondent.*

(97-04-28696-M; CA A98676)

978 P2d 451

Bob Pangburn argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Christine A. Chute, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Deits,* Chief Judge, and Wollheim, Judge.

*

 Deits, C. J., *vice*Riggs, P. J., resigned.

PER CURIAM

Appeal dismissed. *Hamel v. Johnson,*158 Or App 276, 974 P2d 260 (1999); *Jones v. Thompson,*156 Or App 226, 968 P2d 380 (1998).
#### MORSE v. CURTIS

No. 145 PC.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 96.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 March 1974. Appeal dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question 5 March 1974.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1972
WILLIAM E. BENSTON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus DONALD L. EVANS, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (CA-05- 364-RWT) Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 1, 2006 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William E. Benston, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Neil Ray White, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: William E. Benston, Jr., appeals the district court’s order substituting the United States of America in place of Donald L. Evans, Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce, and dismissing his civil action for lack of jurisdiction. We affirm. Benston’s claim is controlled by the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2000), which provides the exclusive remedy for torts committed by a government employee in the scope of his employment. SeeUnited States v. Smith , 499 U.S. 160, 165-66 (1991). We find the United States was appropriately substituted in the place of Donald L. Evans because federal employees who are sued for actions within the scope of their office or employment are immunized, and the United States is substituted in their place. 28 U.S.C. § 2679 (2000). Turning to the dismissal of Benston’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, we find Benston’s complaint was properly dismissed because he failed to exhaust administrative remedies as required before bringing a FTCA action. 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a) (2000). Moreover, even if Benston had properly exhausted his administrative remedies, the district court lacked jurisdiction because the FTCA specifically excludes the tort of false imprisonment from claims for which the United States has waived sovereign immunity. 28 U.S.C. § 2680(h) (2000).- 3 - Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 15
                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP










To Jacobson Stores Inc.:

We are aware that Jacobson Stores Inc. has incorporated by reference in its
Form S-8 Registration Statements File Nos. 033-53469, 333-31989 and 333-59031
and Form S-2 File No. 33-10532 its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October
30, 1999, which includes our report dated November 12, 1999, covering the
unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial information contained
therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that report
is not considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified
by our firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning
of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                                     Very truly yours,



                                                     /s/  Arthur Andersen LLP
                                                     ------------------------
                                                     ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Detroit, Michigan
December 10, 1999
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Salomon Smith Barney Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jennifer Magro                                 Jennifer Magro Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officer and Director

March 30, 2007                                                     Date

----
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-4 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-4 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-4 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-4 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-4 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-4 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-4 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 7 of 7
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Cubic Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, asC.F.O., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: September 29, 2008

 
| Signature: | /s/  Scott D. Guffey    |   |
|------------|-------------------------|--------|
|       | Scott D. Guffey, C.F.O. |

 

----
Case 1:06-cv-15079-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1580 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve consultation by the 

Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Siting Clearinghouse with 

installations affected by windfarm projects, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2019 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself and Mr. TILLIS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve consultation by the Military Aviation and Installation Assurance 

Siting Clearinghouse with installations affected by 

windfarm projects, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Service Pilot Protec5 tion Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1580 IS

1 SEC. 2. CONSULTATION BY MILITARY AVIATION AND IN2 STALLATION ASSURANCE SITING CLEARING3 HOUSE WITH INSTALLATIONS AFFECTED BY 

4 WINDFARM PROJECTS. 

5 Section 183a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following new para7 graph: 

8 ‘‘(4) With respect to an application described in para9 graph (1) for a windfarm project, in ensuring that affected 

10 local military installations are consulted under such para11 graph, the Clearinghouse shall— 

12 ‘‘(A) verify whether the commander of the ap13 propriate major command or forces command, in 

14 consultation with each such installation, approved or 

15 objected to the application; 

16 ‘‘(B) publish on an publicly available internet 

17 website of the Department of Defense the proce18 dures for notifying each such installation of the ap19 plication; and 

20 ‘‘(C) not less frequently than annually, submit 

21 to the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

22 on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, and the 

23 Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the 

24 Senate and the Committee on Armed Services and 

25 the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the 

26 House of Representatives— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 1580 IS

1 ‘‘(i) a list of approvals and objections 

2 under subparagraph (A) during the year cov3 ered by the report; and 

4 ‘‘(ii) an assessment of whether approved 

5 windfarm projects, either individually or collec6 tively, impacted the training capabilities, oper7 ations, or readiness of the military department 

8 concerned during such year.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-03384-JCF Document 5 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 53-12 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 53-12 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 53-12 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03377-CM Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03377-CM Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03377-CM Document 4 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 3 of 3
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 5, 2022

NO. 03-22-00402-CR

Jamie Eugene Cotton, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay 

costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
<PAGE>
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in each of the Registration Statements and related prospectuses on
Form S-8 (No. 333-18311) pertaining to the 1990 Stock Option Plan, 1994 Stock
Option Plan and Non-Discretionary Stock Option Plan of Barrett Resources
Corporation, on Form S-8 (No. 333-02529) pertaining to the Retirement Savings
Plan of Barrett Resources Corporation, and on Form S-8 (No. 33-61097) pertaining
to the 1985 Stock Option Plan, 1985 Stock Option Plan For Non-Employee
Directors, 1989 Stock Option Plan, and 1992 Stock Option Plan of Plains
Petroleum Company (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Barrett Resources Corporation)
of our report dated February 28, 1997, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Barrett Resources Corporation included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.

                                        /s/Arthur Andersen LLP
                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 27, 1997
#### FIKE v. BD. OF TRUSTEES

No. 306 PC.

Case below: 53 N.C. App. 78.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 October 1981.
#### WOJSKO v. STATE

No. 396PC

Case below: 47 N.C. App. 605

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 October 1980. Motion of the Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 7 October 1980.
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD     Document 8-7      Filed 05/31/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD     Document 8-7      Filed 05/31/2007     Page 2 of 2