alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23


       CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We  consent  to  the incorporation by reference  in  this  Annual
Report (Form 10-K) of Intergraph Corporation and subsidiaries  of
our  report  dated January 30, 2002, except for Note 14  and  the
eighth  paragraph of Note 15, as to which the date is  March  11,
2002,  included  in  the 2001 Annual Report  to  Shareholders  of
Intergraph Corporation.

Our  audits  also  included the financial statement  schedule  of
Intergraph Corporation listed in Item 14(a)(2).  This schedule is
the    responsibility   of   the   Company's   management.    Our
responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.   In
our  opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when  considered  in  relation to the basic financial  statements
taken  as  a whole, presents fairly in all material respects  the
information set forth therein.

We  also  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-25880) pertaining to  the
Stock  Bonus  Plan  dated December 22, 1988; in the  Registration
Statement  (Form S-8 No. 33-53849) pertaining to  the  Intergraph
Corporation  1992 Stock Option Plan dated May 27,  1994;  in  the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-57211) pertaining to  the
Assumption  of Options under the InterCAP Graphics Systems,  Inc.
1989  Stock  Option  Plan  and 1994   Nonqualified  Stock  Option
Program  dated  January  10, 1995; in the Registration  Statement
(Form   S-8  No.  33-59621) pertaining  to  the  1995  Intergraph
Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan dated May 26,  1995;  in
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-79129) pertaining to
the Intergraph Corporation Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan
dated  May 24, 1999; in the Registration Statement (Form S-8  No.
333-79137)  pertaining to the Intergraph Corporation  1997  Stock
Option  Plan dated May 24, 1999; and in the related Prospectuses,
of our report dated January  30, 2002, except for Note 14 and the
eighth  paragraph of Note 15, as to which the date is  March  11,
2002,  with  respect  to  the consolidated  financial  statements
incorporated herein by reference and our report included  in  the
preceding  paragraph  with  respect to  the  financial  statement
schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Intergraph
Corporation  and  subsidiaries for the year  ended  December  31,
2001.


                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Birmingham, Alabama
March 26, 2002
Case 1:06-cv-15129-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
AO 440 (Rev. 10/93) Summons in a Civil Action - SDNY WEB 4/99

Iinttei tate5 itrict court

Southern DISTRICT OF New York ;

Medtech Products, Inc.

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL CASE

V. CASE NUMBER:

Dentek Oral Care, Inc.

TO: (Name and address of defendant)

Dentek Oral Care, Inc.

307 Excellence Way

Maryville, Tennessee 37801

^ CV 3304

BIER

YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to serve upon PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY (name and address)

Karl Geercken, Esq.

Amy Manning, Esq.

Alston & Bird LLP

90 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10016

an answer to the complaint which is herewith served upon you, within 20 days after service of this

summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for

the relief demanded in the complaint. You must also file your answer with the Clerk of this Court within a reasonable period

of time after service.

J. MICHAEL 1-.IcMA.HON

R 2 4 2007

CLERK s .. DATEVxcGI

(BY) DEPUTY CLERK

Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 4 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
P 1

stands approximately 6 feet I inches tall, weighs approximately I% pounds with PePl4 fair,

is a (.tit,Z fo— v-tda-k , approximately 140 years of age,

MAY. 2.2007 DLS, INC. NO.950 P.2 4:16PM

Demovsky Lawyer Service

Premier Nationwide Document Retrieval

and Process Service Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

X

MEDTECH PRODUCTS INC.,

Plaintiff,

-againstDENTEK ORAL CARE, INC.,

Defendant.

X

STATE OF TENNESSEE )

S.S..

COUNTY OF KNOX )

R otefZ— &p b.1 , being duly sworn, deposes and says th• she is over the

age of eighteen years, is an agent of the attorney service, D.L.S., Inc., and is not a party to this action.

That on theZa day of April, 2007, at approximately the time of /;i5,4 deponent

served a true copy of the SUMMONS IN A CIVIL CASE; COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

AND MONEY DAMAGES; INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE CHARLES L. BRIEANT; AND

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE GEORGE A. YANTHIS upon DENTEK

ORAL CARE, INC. at 307 Excellence Way, Maryville, TN, by personally delivering and leaving the

same with (Pelt C. I'V's&E who informed deponent that 1 holds the position of

P it E i 2 D(r with that company and is authorized by appointment to receive service at that OPk7o

address.

Case No. 07 CV 3304

(Judge Brieant) ,

AFFIDAVIT OP SERVICE

PROCESS SERVER

Sworn to before me this

day of May, 2007

^$^nmscc®re^r®®e'##

/120 4,"i,

/ NOTARY •\ •

PLJSLIO. r;

AT

LARGE

alas

D.L.S., Inc,

401 Broadway

Ste 510

NY, NY 10013

212-92S-1220

wwwdlsny.com

Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 4 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                       Exhibit 8



                       TABLE OF REGISTRANT'S SUBSIDIARIES

Currently, Chartered has five subsidiaries, the particulars of which are as
follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Country of            Date of           Proportion of ownership
Name of subsidiary                                        incorporation       incorporation                interest
------------------                                      -----------------     -------------        -----------------------
<S>                                                     <C>                   <C>                  <C>
Chartered Silicon Partners Pte Ltd.                         Singapore           March 1997                   51%
Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Inc.                     U.S.             June 1991                   100%
Chartered Semiconductor Japan Kabushiki Kaisha                Japan            October 2000                 100%
Chartered Semiconductor Taiwan Ltd.                           Taiwan           August 2000                  100%
Chartered Semiconductor Europe Ltd.                     England and Wales       March 2001                  100%
</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 26 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 26 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 2 of 2
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

_________________________________________

B.M., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN 

SERVICES, INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE,

PHOENIX INDIAN MEDICAL CENTER,

Phoenix, AZ, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 22-1283

Issued: January 2, 2024

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

John A. Beaver, Jr., Esq., for the appellant1

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On September 2, 2022 appellant, through counsel, filed a timely appeal from an August 1, 

2022 merit decision of the Office of Workers Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the 

Appellate Boards assigned the appeal Docket No. 22-1283.

In a letter dated December 13, 2023 and received on December 28, 2023, counselrequested 

that the appeal be withdrawn as the matter has been settled with the Office of Workers’

Compensation Programs. 

1

In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for legal 

or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). 

No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board. Id. An attorney or 

representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, subject to fine or 

imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also 18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of fees to a 

representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation.
2

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that counsel’s request for the 

withdrawal of the appeal should be granted.2 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT counsel’s request for the withdrawal of the appeal is 

granted. The appeal docketed as No. 22-1283 is dismissed.

Issued: January 2, 2024

Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

2 The Board’s decisions and orders are final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance. 20 

C.F.R. § 501.6(d).
#### STATE v. SMEDLEY

No. 713P82.

Case below: 60 N.C. App. 1.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 February 1983. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 8 February 1983.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**FORM 10-Q**

 

**Section 1350Certifications**

 

**Quarterended June 30, 2008**

 

I, Herbert Lindo,Chairman, President and Principal Financial Officer of Kenilworth SystemsCorporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)               the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Companyfor the second quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)               the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

Dated:  July 29,2008

 
|        | /s/ Herbert Lindo                                                |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Herbert Lindo                                                    |
|   | Chairman, Chief  Executive Officer and Chief   Financial Officer |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------------------X 07 CV 3314

DR. JUDY WOOD on behalf of the

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Notice of Appearance

(GBD)

Plaintiff/Relator,

vs.

APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.;

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL

CORP., BOEING, NuSTATS; COMPUTER

AIDED ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.;

DATASOURCE, INC.; GEOSTAATS, INC.;

GILSANZ MURRAY STEFICEK LLP;

HUGHES ASSOCIATES, INC.; AJMAL

ABBASI; EDUARDO KAUSEL;

DAVID PARKS; DAVID SHARP; DANIELE

VENEZANO; JOSEF VAN DYCK; KASPAR

WILLIAM; ROLF JENSEN & ASOCIATES,

INC.; ROSENWASSER/GROSSMAN CONSULTING

ENGINEERS, P.C.; SIMPOSON GUMPERTZ &

HEGER, INC.; S.K. GHOSH ASSOCIATES,

INC.; SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL, LLP;

TENG & ASSOCIATES, INC;

UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES, INC.;

WISS, JANNEY, ELSTNER ASSOCIATES, INC.;

AMERICAN AIRLINES; SILVERSTEIN

PROPERTIES; and UNITED AIRLINES,

Defendants.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------X

COUNSEL:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that Donovan Hatem LLP, 1 Penn Plaza, Suite 3324,

New York, New York 10119, has been retained as counsel to represent the interests of

defendant Simpson Gumpertz & Heger, Inc. (“SGH”) and Computed Aided Engineering

Associates, Inc. (“CAEAI”) and hereby files a Notice of Appearance, without waiver of

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 97 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 1 of 2
its rights to assert any and all Affirmative Defenses including but not limited to all

jurisdictional defenses.

Dated New York, New York

March 28, 2008

Donovan Hatem LLP.

/s/ David M. Pollack

David M. Pollack (DP6143)

Attorney for Defendant

Simpson Gumpertz & Heger, Inc.

One Penn Plaza, Suite 3324

New York, New York 10119

(212) 244-3333

Donovan Hatem LLP.

David J. Hatem

Patricia B. Gary

World Trade Center East

Two Seaport Lane

Boston, MA 02210

To: All Parties via ECF

01136253/25550.144

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 97 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, A.L. Giannopoulos, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
MICROS Systems, Inc. (Registrant), certify that to the best of my knowledge,
based upon a review of the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2003 of the Registrant (the Report):

(1) The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



|      |  |                      
|----- |  | ---------------------
|      |  | /s/ A.L. Giannopoulos
|Name: |  | A.L. Giannopoulos    
|Date: |  | September 29, 2003   



---

Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Gary C. Kaufman, Executive Vice President of Finance and Administration
and the Chief Financial Officer of MICROS Systems, Inc. (Registrant), certify
that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the annual report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 of the Registrant (the
Report):

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

/s/ Gary C. KaufmanName:
    
    Gary C. KaufmanDate:
    
    September 29, 2003
# U n i ted S ta te s Cou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 22-5179 September Term, 2021 1: 22-cv -009 75-UNA Filed O n: August 24, 20 22 Helene T onique Lau rent Mill er,

App ellant
v . Josep h R. B iden , Jr., P residen t, e t al.,

App ellees
ON A PPE A L FROM THE UNITED STA TES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE: Kat sas a nd Rao, Circuit Judges, and Se nte lle, Se nior Circuit Jud ge J U D G M E N T T his ap pea l was co nside red o n th e reco rd f rom the United Sta tes District Cou rt for th e District of

Colum bia a nd on the brief f iled b y ap pellan t. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P

. 34(a )(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34 (j). It is ORDERED A ND A DJUDGED tha t th e d istrict court’s a me nde d o rder f iled Ju ne 15, 20 22, be af

f irmed . T he district cou rt correctly conclud ed tha t ap pellan t’s com plaint failed to co mp ly

w ith th e requirem ent s of Fed eral Rule of

Civ il Proced ure 8 (a). Se e Fed. R. Civ . P. 8(a) (requiring a com plaintto cont ain “a sho rt an d p lain sta tem entof the groun ds for th e co urt’s jurisdiction ,” “a sho rt an d p lain sta tem entof the claim sho w ing tha t th e p lead er is en titled to re lief ,” an d “a dem and for th e relief sou ght”). Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41

. Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Depu ty Cl erk
Exhibit 11

Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 13-12 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 1 of 3
OIG-RR-00173

Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 13-12 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 2 of 3
OIG-RR-00174

Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 13-12 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 23.1









Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To Bairnco Corporation:



We have issued our reports dated January 26, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule includedin the Annual Report of Bairnco Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Bairnco Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 33-36330, effective July 18, 1990 and File No. 33-41313, effective, June 19, 1991).





/s/ Grant Thornton LLP





Orlando, Florida

February 17, 2006
Case 1:06-cv-15131-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
®o ® ®

ININdINOF SIHL ININdINOF SIHL INFNdINOF SIHL
NVI1) HO F1VdId00L = =NVIDAOTVIIGOOL == NVI1) 40 71VdId0 OL
8174 ISAW NOA 8134 ISAW NOA 8174 ISAW NOA

ININdINOF SIHL ININdINOF SIL ININdINOF SIL
NVI1) YO F1VAIdGO OL «= NVFTD YO FVAFdOOL  — NV71) HO F1Va3d0 OL
8134 ISAW NOA 8134 ISNW NOA 8134 ISNW NOA
#### STATE v. JONES

No. 23P83.

Case below: 60 N.C. App. 116.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 25 January 1983.
Case 1:06-cv-15042-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1761 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1761

   To direct the Secretary of Defense to modernize certain forms and 
     surveys of the Department of Defense, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 10, 2019

 Ms. Duckworth (for herself, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Markey, Mr. Leahy, and Ms. 
  Klobuchar) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Secretary of Defense to modernize certain forms and 
     surveys of the Department of Defense, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODERNIZATION OF CERTAIN FORMS AND SURVEYS.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study to 
identify each form and survey of the Department of Defense, in use on 
the date of the enactment of this Act, that contains a term or 
classification that the Secretary determines may be considered racially 
or ethnically insensitive.
    (b) Reports.--
            (1) Interim reports.--On the date that is 90 days after the 
        date of the enactment of this Act, and on the date that is 180 
        days after such date of enactment, the Secretary shall submit 
        to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of 
        Representatives and the Senate a report on the status of the 
        study conducted under subsection (a).
            (2) Final report.--Not later than one year after the date 
        of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
        Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives 
        and the Senate a report on the results of the study conducted 
        under subsection (a) that includes--
                    (A) a list of each form and survey identified under 
                such study; and
                    (B) a plan for modernizing the terms and 
                classifications contained in such forms and surveys, 
                including legislative recommendations.
    (c) Modernization Required.--Not later than 18 months after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall carry out the 
plan included in the report submitted under subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
Motion for Extension of Time to Pay Filing Fee 1 

14-15-00648-CV

 

IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 

HOUSTON, TX 

 

GWENDOLYN JACKSON AND BILLY JACKSON 

v. 

CACH, LLC 

 

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law Number 3 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 1049215 

APPELLANTS’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO PAY FILING FEE 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS 

 Appellants, GWENDOLYN JACKSON and BILLY JACKSON, respectfully file this 

Motion for Extension of Time to Pay Filing Fee. 

1. The court previously provided notice to Appellants of the due date of the filing fee, however, 

Appellants were unable to pay the fee by the deadline because they are on a fixed income and other 

financial obligations prevented their paying the fee timely. 

2. This Motion seeks an extension of time to pay the filing fee, but does not require additional 

time because Appellants filing fee has now been paid.

3. Appellants’ counsel, Taura Spates requests that this Honorable Court accept Appellants’ 

filing fee which has now been paid to the court. 

ACCEPTED

14-15-00648-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

8/27/2015 11:10:18 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/27/2015 11:10:18 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Motion for Extension of Time to Pay Filing Fee 2

4. Appellants’ filing fee was not paid late in reckless disregard for the notice requesting that the 

fee be paid by August 21, 2015, but was submitted in good faith as soon as financially possible, 

without any negative consequence to Appellee.

5. For these reasons, Appellants respectfully requests that this court accept Appellants’ filing 

fee so that the appeal may go forward.

Respectfully submitted,

 /s/ Taura D. Spates

TAURA SPATES

State Bar No.: 24071745

P.O. Box 742393

Houston, Texas 77274

Tel: (713) 203 3861

Fax: (281) 206-2660

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS,

GWENDOLYN JACKSON AND

BILLY JACKSON
Motion for Extension of Time to Pay Filing Fee 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that the above and foregoing Motion for Extension of Time to Pay Filing Fee has

been served by delivery of a true copy on the August 27, 2015 to Appellee Cach, LLC by electronic 

transmission as follows:

Richard E. Clark

rclark@rclegal.net

Fallon Hamilton

fhamilton@rclegal.net

Shaun G. Brown

sbrown@rclegal.net

 /s/ Taura D. Spates

Taura Spates