alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-3673

___________________________

Mark Parker; Gloria J. Payer, and those Similarly Situated

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

Thurston County, Nebraska; Caroline Frenchman; Darren Wolf; Georgia

Maymberry; Leonard Peters; Greg Jump; Dan Trimble; Mark English; Village of

Walthill, an Entity within the Omaha Reservation and within Thurston County,

Nebraska; Mike Grant; Gwen Porter; Vida Stabler; Drew Kingare; Michael Wolfe,

Sr.; Earlene Hradec; Randy Urbanec; Douglas L. Luebe; Nora H. Goll; Shelly

Perez; State of Nebraska

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

____________

 Submitted: July 20, 2016

Filed: July 21, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
In May 2015, Mark Parker and Gloria Payer filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C.

§§ 1983 and 1985 against the State of Nebraska; Thurston County, Nebraska; the

Village of Walthill; and various individuals associated with these entities. Plaintiffs

alleged that defendants violated their civil rights by questioning, arresting,

prosecuting, and jailing plaintiffs--without jurisdiction--for offenses they committed

while driving on roads within the Omaha Tribal Reservation. The district court

1

granted defendants’ unopposed Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) motions,

and denied plaintiffs’ Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(a)(2) postjudgment motion.

Following de novo review of the grant of the motion to dismiss, see Adams v.

Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., 813 F.3d 1151, 1154 (8th Cir. 2016), and careful review

of the parties’ submissions on appeal, we agree with the district court that the

complaint is untimely under the four-year limitations period set out in Neb. Rev. Stat.

§ 25-207, see Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 280 (1985), and we conclude also that

the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying postjudgment relief, see Stults

v. Am. Pop Corn Co., 815 F.3d 409, 414 (8th Cir. 2016); Arnold v. Wood, 238 F.3d

992, 998 (8th Cir. 2001).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________

The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of 1

Nebraska.

-2-
### U NITED 

### S TATES 

### A IR 

### F ORCE



### C OURT OF 

### C RIMINAL 

### A PPEALS

UNITED STATES ) No. ACM S32763

Appellee )
)

v. )
) ORDER
Jorge H. VILLANUEVA GONZALEZ )
Airman First Class (E

- 3) )

U.S. Air Force )

Appellant ) Panel 1

On 21 May 2024

, Appellant submitted a Motion to Withdraw from Appellant Review and Motion to Attach. Specifically, Appellant moved to attach a

DD Form 2330, Waiver/Withdrawal of Appellate Rights in General and Special

Courts

- Martial Subject to Review by a Court of Criminal Appeals , signed by

Appellant and Appellant’s counsel on 20 May 2024

.
The Government did not submit any opposition.

Accordingly, it is by the court on this 22d day of May

, 202 4

,

ORDERED:

Appellant’s Motion to Withdraw from Appellate Review and Motion to Attach are GRANTED. Appellant’s case is forwarded to the Appellate Records

Branch (JAJM) for further processing in accordance with Rules for Courts

Martial 1115(f)(3) and 1201, Manual for Courts

- Martial, United States (20 24

ed.).

FOR THE COURT

OLGA STANFORD, Capt, USAF

Commissioner
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7547

PAUL F. LEE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; RON ANGELONE; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-58-7) Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: January 7, 2003 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul F. Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Paul F. Lee, a Virginia prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice of judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 225 3(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1)’that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied , 122 S. Ct. 318 (2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Lee has not made the requisite showing. See Lee v. Department of Corr. , No. CA-02-58-7 (W.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 21.01

Exhibit 21.01List of Subsidiaries

Name of Subsidiary

Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or
OrganizationDomestic:American Home Buyers Alliance, Inc.

WyomingCoral Aviation, Inc.

DelawareTigrent Enterprises Inc.

NevadaTigrent Financial Inc.

FloridaSCB Building, LLC

FloridaTranquility Bay of Southwest FL, LLC

FloridaTigrent Communications Inc.

WyomingTigrent Group Inc.

FloridaTigrent Learning Inc.

FloridaWhitney Leadership Group, Inc.

FloridaTigrent Holdings Inc.

ColoradoTigrent Brands Inc.

ColoradoTigrent eLearning Inc.

ColoradoInternational:Tigrent Learning Australia PTY LTD

AustraliaTigrent Learning Canada Inc.

CanadaWhitney Development Limited

United KingdomWhitney Education Deutschland GmbH

GermanyWhitney International Limited

United KingdomWhitney International (Singapore) PTE. LTD

SingaporeTigrent Learning UK Limited

United Kingdom


---



QuickLinks
# L_2007310EN.01002201.xml

| 28.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 310/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 310/22

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1380/2007 of 26 November 2007 concerning the authorisation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase (Natugrain Wheat TS) as a feed additive

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 309 of 27 November 2007
  )

On page 23, in the first column of the table, ‘Identification number of the additive’:

for:

‘4d 62’,

read:

‘4a 62’.

---
Case 1:06-cv-15113-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit      21.1**

**LIST      OF SUBSIDIARIES**

| 1. | GuildMaster,                Inc., a Missouri corporation, doing business under the name                "GuildMaster". |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Faith                Walk Designs, Inc., a Missouri corporation, doing business under                the names                "Faith Walk" and "Faith Walk                Designs". |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | WestWay                Enterprises, Ltd., a Hong Kong corporation, doing business under                the name                ”WestWay”. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | P.T.                Niaga Merapi, an Indonesian corporation, doing business under the                name                ”Merapi”. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Case 1:06-cv-15136-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 13-3 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 13-3 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.3


 


PAYMENT WAIVER AGREEMENT


 


This Payment Waiver
Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of August 16, 2009
by and between Goldleaf Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Company”), and G. Lynn
Boggs (“Employee”).


 


W I T N E S S E T H:


 


WHEREAS,
Employee and Company previously entered into an Employment Agreement dated December 9,
2005 that was amended on May 10, 2007 (the “Employment Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, Company is
contemplating a merger with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Jack Henry &
Associates, Inc. (“JKH”) and (the “JKH Merger”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Board of
Directors of Company has requested and Employee has agreed to waive certain
contractual rights to receive cash and other consideration with an estimated fair
value of between $318,875 and $352,337 in connection with the JKH Merger; and


 


WHEREAS, Employee has done
so in order to induce JKH to directly increase the merger consideration payable
to the shareholders of the Company by $318,875; and


 


WHEREAS, as a condition precedent
to such merger consideration increase, JKH has required the execution of this Agreement
by Employee to confirm the agreements set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual promises and agreements made herein, and other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.             With respect to the payments set
forth in Section 5.c.(ii) of the Employment Agreement, Employee
agrees to waive the right to receive $235,077 of the amounts due thereunder.


 


2.             With respect to the right to
continuation of stock options as specified in Section 5.c.(iv) of the
Employment Agreement, Employee hereby agrees to forfeit the right to such
continuation, which, based upon a Black-Sholes valuation, has an estimated
value of between $83,798 and $117,260.


 


3.             The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that, except as
specifically set forth herein, this Agreement shall not affect Employee’s right
to receive the severance benefits set forth in the Employment Agreement as a
result of the JKH Merger to be paid at Closing. Except as expressly amended
hereby, the terms of the Employment Agreement are unmodified and remain in full
force and effect. The parties further agree that this waiver, agreed to in
connection with the JKH Merger, shall not operate as a waiver of Employee’s
payment rights in connection with any other transaction or event.


 

















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


 


	
   

  	
  /s/ Gregory Lynn Boggs

  
	
   

  	
  G.
  Lynn Boggs

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Goldleaf
  Financial Solutions, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/
  Scot Kees

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  Scot
  Kees

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title

  	
  SVP
  and General Counsel

  



 


2
#### MANN v. MANN

No. 343 PC.

Case below: 53 N.C. App. --- (8010DC1088).

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 October 1981.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**FORM 10-Q**

 

**Quarter ended September 30, 2008**

 

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I,Herbert Lindo, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Kenilworth Systems Corporation;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)     Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)     All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: October 15, 2008

 
|   | /s/  Herbert Lindo                     |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Herbert  Lindo                         |
|   | Chairman,  Chief Executive Officer and |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer               |

 

----
Order entered March 1 2 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 01538
- CR
DOMINGO SANCHEZ
- RODRIGUEZ, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Tr ial Court Cause No. 380
- 80148
- 2012



### O RDER
We REINSTATE this appeal. On December 5, 2013 we abated this appeal and ordered the trial court to make findings regarding the voluntariness of appellant’s statement admitted as State’s Exhibit No. 1. On January 6, 2014, w e received and filed a Second S upplemental C lerk’s R ecord containing the requested findings . We will dispose of the appeal in due course.

/s/ DAVID EVANS PRESIDING JUSTICE
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 1-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 1-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 1-6 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Core Center Grants (P30).                    

*Date:*                         December 12-13, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Yan Z. Wang, MD, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 820, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-4957,                         *wangy1@mail.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 18, 2005.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-23344 Filed 11-25-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-03359-NRB Document 3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03359-NRB Document 3 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03365-PAC Document 5-3 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03365-PAC Document 5-3 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03365-PAC Document 5-3 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03365-PAC Document 5-3 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03365-PAC Document 5-3 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 5 of 5
#### STATE v. PEARCE

No. 194 PC.

No. 96 (Fall Term).

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 652.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 29 August 1978. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 29 August 1978.
Case 1:06-cv-15067-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15067-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15067-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15067-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15067-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15067-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15067-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15067-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15067-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15067-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15067-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15067-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15067-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14865-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 14.2

Independent Auditors' Consent

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos.
333-12670, 333-12672, 333-98425, 333-101452 and 333-107975 of O//2//Micro
International Limited on Form S-8 of our report dated January 24, 2002,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of O2 Micro International Limited
for the year ended December 31, 2003.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche
-------------------------------------------------------
Deloitte and Touche
(TN Soong & Co and Deloitte & Touche (Taiwan)
established Deloitte & Touche effective June 1, 2003)
Taipei, Taiwan
Republic of China
June 10, 2004
#### STATE v. McALLISTER

No. 115 PC.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 359.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 30 December 1974.
**Exhibit
      21.1**


**LIST
      OF SUBSIDIARIES**





1.
      GuildMaster, Inc., a Missouri corporation, doing business under the name
      "GuildMaster".


2.
      Faith
      Walk Designs, Inc., a Missouri corporation, doing business under the names
      "Faith Walk" and "Faith
      Walk Designs".


3.
      WestWay Enterprises, Ltd., a Hong Kong corporation, doing business under the
      name ”WestWay”.


4.
      P.T.
      Niaga Merapi, an Indonesian corporation, doing business under the name
”Merapi”.
#### BUYERS CORP. v. UNDERWRITERS, INC.

No. 122 PC.

Case below: 38 N.C. App. 391.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 January 1979.
Case 1:07-cv-03248-JFK Document 25 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03248-JFK Document 25 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. DENNY

No. 345 PC

Case below: 47 NC App 207

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 September 1980.
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 15 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 1