alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS     Document 37      Filed 03/17/2008     Page 1 of 5

Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS     Document 37      Filed 03/17/2008     Page 2 of 5

Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS     Document 37      Filed 03/17/2008     Page 3 of 5

Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS     Document 37      Filed 03/17/2008     Page 4 of 5

Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS     Document 37      Filed 03/17/2008     Page 5 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-03456-KMK-MDF Document 11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03456-KMK-MDF Document 11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

AMERICAN PATENTS LLC,

Appellant

v.

UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC,

Appellee

______________________ 

2021-1635

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-

00482.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

LARRY D. THOMPSON, JR., Antonelli, Harrington & 

Thompson, LLP, Houston, TX, argued for appellant. Also 

represented by MATTHEW JAMES ANTONELLI, ZACHARIAH 

HARRINGTON, REHAN M. SAFIULLAH. 

 DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS, Haynes & Boone, LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by DAVID L.

MCCOMBS; RAGHAV BAJAJ, DAVID W. O'BRIEN, Austin, TX; 

ANGELA OLIVER, Washington, DC; ASHRAF FAWZY,

Case: 21-1635 Document: 54 Page: 1 Filed: 03/10/2022
JONATHAN RUDOLPH KOMINEK STROUD, Unified Patents, 

LLC, Chevy Chase, MD. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

March 10, 2022

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 21-1635 Document: 54 Page: 2 Filed: 03/10/2022
Case 1:06-cv-15112-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15155-AKH Document 19 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:06-cv-15155-AKH Document 19 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### J. F. Humphreys & Co. v. J. M. Roth et al.

1. *Freehold—When*involved.—A proceeding by bill in chancery, to transfer the legal title to real estate from one party to another, involves a. freehold.

Memorandum.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Champaign County; the Hon. Francis M. Wright, Judge, presiding.

Appeal dismissed as involving a freehold.

Opinion filed February 11, 1895.

J. O. Cunningham and E. Barry, attorneys for appellant.

Appellees’ Brief, Thomas J. Smith, Attorney.

By the original bill in this case, the appellant seeks to perfect title in itself to the property in controversy, and therefore the freehold estate is involved. A subject which is not within the jurisdiction of this court. Sec. 28, *41Chap. 37, S. *&*C. Statutes; Chicago R. Co. v. Watson, 105 Ill. 217; Neimeyer v. Knight, 7 Brad. 200; Bridges v. Rice, 99 Ill. 414; Oswald v. Wolfe, 126 Ill. 542; Farmers’ Nat. Bank v. Sperling, 113 Ill. 273.

The appeal, therefore, in this case should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction of this court to try the subject-matter of this litigation.

Me. Presiding Justice Wall

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellant sued out a writ of attachment and levied upon the lot in dispute as the property of J. M. Both. Such proceedings were had that the appellant obtained a judgment' and bought in the lot upon a sale under special execution.

Holding the certificate of purchase, appellant filed the bill in this case, alleging, in effect, that Savage held the legal title for the benefit of Both, and asking appropriate relief. Ida Both, wife of J. M. Both, who was made a party defendant, filed her cross-bill alleging that she was the owner of the equitable title and asking that Savage be required to convey to her. The court upon hearing the evidence orally, dismissed the original bill and granted the relief as prayed in the cross-bill. The question of fact was sharply contested, and as the evidence was oral, we must defer very largely to the conclusion reached by the chancellor. We are not able to say that his finding on the facts was erroneous. It is suggested, however, that a freehold is involved in the controversy.

The scope of thé bill was to transfer the legal title from Savage to complainant or to Both. The scope of the cross-bill was to transfer it to Mrs. Both.

If it was her money that paid for the lot, as she alleged and proved to the satisfaction of the court, the lot was hers. If it was the husband’s money then the title should have been vested in him, or in the complainant, if the time of redemption had expired.

It is not like the case where property is fraudulently conveyed by a debtor to hinder his creditor.

*42In. such case the conveyance is good as between the parties thereto, but the grantee takes the property subject to a lien for the debt. Here the legal title never was in the debtor, but it was sought to vest it in him as against another who asserted ownership. We are inclined to hold that the controversy involved a freehold, and therefore must dismiss the appeal. The appellant may withdraw record, abstracts and briefs. Appeal dismissed.
Case 7:07-cv-03232-CS-LMS Document 23 Filed 08/01/2008 Page 1 of 5Case 7:07-cv-03232-CS-LMS Document 23 Filed 08/01/2008 Page 2 of 5Case 7:07-cv-03232-CS-LMS Document 23 Filed 08/01/2008 Page 3 of 5Case 7:07-cv-03232-CS-LMS Document 23 Filed 08/01/2008 Page 4 of 5Case 7:07-cv-03232-CS-LMS Document 23 Filed 08/01/2008 Page 5 of 5
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1749 

To clarify seasoning requirements for certain refinanced mortgage loans, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2019 

Ms. SINEMA (for herself and Mr. TILLIS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To clarify seasoning requirements for certain refinanced 

mortgage loans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Affordable 

5 Mortgages for Veterans Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SEASONING REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN REFI7 NANCED MORTGAGE LOANS. 

8 (a) GINNIE MAE.—Section 306(g)(1) of the National 

9 Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1721(g)(1)) is amended by strik10 ing the second sentence. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1749 CPS

1 (b) VETERANS LOANS.—Section 3709(c) of title 38, 

2 United States Code, is amended— 

3 (1) in the matter before paragraph (1), by 

4 striking ‘‘is refinanced’’ and inserting ‘‘is a refi5 nance’’; and 

6 (2) by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and in7 serting the following new paragraphs: 

8 ‘‘(1) the date on which the borrower has made 

9 at least six consecutive monthly payments on the 

10 loan being refinanced; and 

11 ‘‘(2) the date that is 210 days after the first 

12 payment due date of the loan being refinanced.’’. 

13 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

14 may be construed to restrict or otherwise modify the au15 thorities of the Government National Mortgage Associa16 tion. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### George VASQUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lee BACA, Sheriff, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-55311.

D.C. No. CV-03-00951-DOC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 2005.*

Decided April 11, 2005.

George Vasquez, Atascadero, CA, pro se.

Cindy S. Lee, Jin S. Choi, Esq., Jennifer R. Hong, Esq., Franscell, Strickland, Roberts *&*Lawrence, Glendale, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

George Vasquez, a California civil detainee, appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing for failure to state a claim his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the conditions of his confinement during state civil confinement proceedings violated his constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. After de novo review, *Zimmerman v. City of Oakland,*255 F.3d 734, 737 (9th Cir.2001), we vacate and remand.

Under *Jones v. Blanas,*393 F.3d 918, 932 (9th Cir.2004), which was decided after the district court issued its order, Vasquez’s allegations that he was confined in conditions “identical to, similar to, or more restrictive than” those in which his criminal counterparts were being held at the jail, create a rebuttable presumption that there is a punitive purpose behind his treatment. Vasquez’s complaint therefore states a due process claim under the Fourteenth Amendment. *See id.*at 931-34.

We deny as moot Vasquez’s motion for appointment of counsel.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

VACATED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-120228 and 333-133394 on Forms S-8 of our report dated March 16, 2011, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Intersections Inc., and the effectiveness ofIntersections Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Intersections Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

McLean, Virginia 

November 18, 2011
Exhibit 12.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Perry Kuo, certify that:

      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of O2Micro International
Limited;

      1. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      2. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

      3. The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

            a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

            b) [Reserved];

            c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered
      by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
      to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

      4. The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

            b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal
      control over financial reporting.

Date: June 28, 2006
                               By:          /s/  PERRY KUO
                                  -------------------------------------
                                                Perry Kuo
                                         Chief Financial Officer
RUBENSTEIN & RYNECKI Case 2:06-cv-06540-JS-WDW Document 9 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 1 of 2 Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 1-12 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-06540-JS-WDW Document 9 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 2 of 2 Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 1-12 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03355-LTS Document 14 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03355-LTS Document 14 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03372-VM Document 6 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 6-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 6-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD     Document 8-15      Filed 05/31/2007     Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32(a)Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350I, Joseph P. Keithley, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of KeithleyInstruments, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2007which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Joseph P. Keithley Joseph P. Keithley
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERUNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the filing by ARTISTdirect, Inc. (the “Registrant”) of itsAnnual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the“Annual Report”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Robert N.Weingarten, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Annual Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theAnnual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Registrant.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Date:       April 25, 2006 | By:    | /s/ ROBERT N. WEINGARTEN       |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                                                     |   | Robert N. Weingarten           |
|                                                     |   | Chief Financial Officer        |
|                                                     |   | (Principal Financial  Officer) |

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 3 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 4 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 5 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 6 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 7 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 8 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 9 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 10 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 11 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 12 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 13 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 14 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 15 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 16 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 17 of 17
#### STATE v. JOHNSON

No. 688P82.

Case below: 59 N.C. App. 362.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 March 1983.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

# Soldier Accounted For From Korean War (Phillips, H.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
EXHIBIT 10.3



02 MICRO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED



Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act



In connection with the periodic report of 02Micro
International Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Sterling Du, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify
as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                 
|-----------------
|Date: May 7, 2003
|                 



---

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 21**

 

**Subsidiaries of the Registrant:**

 

Broadband Capital Corporation 

BroadbandRoyalty Corporation 

Broadband Network Services, Inc. [dba 

Worldbridge Broadband Services, Inc.] 

Worldbridge Broadband Services, S., de R.L., de C.V. 

Broadband Management Solutions LLC 

C-CORArgentina, S.R.L. 

C COR de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. 

C-COR Broadband Communications Europe GmbH 

C-COR Electronics Canada, Inc. 

C-COR Europe Holdings B.V. 

C-COR BroadbandGmbH 

C-COR Iberica, S.L. 

C-COR Australia PTY LTD 

C-COR Singapore PTE LTD 

nCUBE UK Limited 

Stargus, Inc. 

C-COR Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Case 1:06-cv-15132-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### FONVIELLE v. INSURANCE CO.

No. 171 PC.

No. 54 (Fall Term).

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 495.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 14 July 1978.
Case 1:07-cv-03011-LBS Document 18 Filed 07/15/2008 Page 1 of 1
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2009

p1019 

# Order

October 26, 2009

139355

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139355 COA: 283850 Wayne CC: 07-003451-FC JAMES L. NICHOLAS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 18, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                      ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-95533, 333-31004 and 333-31006) of Caminus
Corporation of our report dated February 22, 2000, relating to the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Caminus Corporation,
and of our report dated August 28, 1998, relating to the financial statements of
ZAI*NET Software, Inc., which appear in this Form 10-k.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, NY
March 28, 2000
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Decorize, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
      the year ended June 30, 2007 and filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.






*/s/
      Billie J.
      Montle*





Billie
      J.
      Montle


Interim
      Vice President of Finance and Corporate Controller


(Principal
      Financial Officer)


September
      28, 2007