alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1521 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1521

  To amend section 327 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
  Emergency Assistance Act to clarify that National Urban Search and 
   Rescue Response System task forces may include Federal employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2019

   Mr. Hawley (for himself, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Scott of Florida, and Ms. 
    Hassan) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend section 327 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
  Emergency Assistance Act to clarify that National Urban Search and 
   Rescue Response System task forces may include Federal employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL EMPLOYEES AND NATIONAL URBAN SEARCH AND RESCUE 
              RESPONSE SYSTEM TASK FORCES.

    Section 327 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5165f) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(p) Federal Employees.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to mean that a task force may not include Federal employees. 
In the case of a Federal employee detailed to a task force, the 
sponsoring agency shall enter into an agreement with the relevant 
employing Federal agency.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### WHITESELL v. WHITESELL

No. 696P82.

Case below: 59 N.C. App. 552.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 February 1983.
Case 1:07-cr-00363-PKC Document 1 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cr-00363-PKC Document 1 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cr-00363-PKC Document 1 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### ORMOND v. CRAMPTON

No. 60 PC.

Case below: 16 N.C. App. 88.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 November 1972.
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 1 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 2 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 3 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 4 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 5 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 6 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 7 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 8 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 9 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 10 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 11 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 12 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 13 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 14 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 15 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 16 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 17 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 18 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 19 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 20 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 21 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 22 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 23 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 24 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 25 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 26 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 27 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 28 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 29 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 30 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 31 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 32 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 33 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 34 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 35 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 36 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 37 of 38
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-10 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 38 of 38
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 16 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03248-JFK Document 18 Filed 11/20/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03248-JFK Document 18 Filed 11/20/2007 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>


<TABLE>


                                                             Exhibit 11


                                  KOLLMORGEN CORPORATION
                              COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
               (Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
                                 (unaudited)


<CAPTION>
                                        For the               For the
                                  Three Months Ended    Nine Months Ended
                                    September 30,         September 30, 
                                  ------------------   -------------------
<S>                               <C>       <C>        <C>       <C>     
                                    1996      1995       1996      1995  
                                  --------  --------   --------  --------
Net income                        $ 1,804   $ 1,501    $ 5,681   $ 4,511 
     
Less preferred stock dividends
     and accretion of discount          0      (582)      (285)   (1,746)
                                  --------  --------   --------  --------
Earnings applicable to 
     primary common shares          1,804       919       5,396    2,765 

Number of shares:
  Weighted average number of 
     shares outstanding:
  Primary                          10,044     9,670     10,036     9,659 
  Fully diluted                    10,056     9,670     10,082     9,659 
                                  --------  --------   --------  --------
Earnings per common share:
  Primary                         $  0.18   $  0.10    $  0.54   $  0.29 
                                  ========  ========   ========  ========
  Fully diluted                   $  0.18   $  0.10    $  0.54   $  0.29 
                                  ========  ========   ========  ========




<FN>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.  
</TABLE>
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 170 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to limit the amount of certain 

qualified conservation contributions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 16, 2019 

Mr. DAINES (for himself and Ms. STABENOW) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to limit the 

amount of certain qualified conservation contributions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Charitable Conserva5 tion Easement Program Integrity Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 170 IS

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON PARTNER’S DEDUCTION FOR 

2 QUALIFIED CONSERVATION CONTRIBUTIONS 

3 MADE BY PARTNERSHIP. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 170(h) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(7) LIMITATION ON PARTNERSHIP ALLOCA8 TION OF CONTRIBUTIONS.— 

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any 

10 qualified conservation contributions of any part11 nership (whether directly or as a distributive 

12 share of such contributions of another partner13 ship), no amount of such contributions may be 

14 taken into account under this section by any 

15 partner of such partnership as a distributive 

16 share of such contributions if the aggregate 

17 amount so taken into account by such partner 

18 for the taxable year would (but for this para19 graph) exceed 2.5 times such partner’s adjusted 

20 basis in such partnership (determined as of the 

21 close of such taxable year and without regard to 

22 such contributions). The preceding sentence 

23 shall apply only with respect to the first 3 tax24 able years of such partner which end after the 

25 date on which such partner first became a part26 ner in the partnership. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 170 IS

1 ‘‘(B) EXCEPTION FOR FAMILY PARTNER2 SHIPS.—Subparagraph (A) shall not apply with 

3 respect to any partnership if substantially all of 

4 the partnership interests in such partnership 

5 are held by individuals who are related within 

6 the meaning of section 152(d)(2). 

7 ‘‘(C) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary shall 

8 prescribe such regulations or other guidance as 

9 may be necessary to carry out, and prevent the 

10 avoidance of, the purposes of this paragraph.’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply to 

12 contributions made in taxable years ending after Decem13 ber 23, 2016. No inference is intended as the appropriate 

14 treatment of contributions made in taxable years ending 

15 on or before such date or as to any activity not described 

16 in section 170(h)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

17 1986, as added by this section. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### IN RE SOUTHERN RAILWAY

No. 650PA82.

Case below: 59 N.C. App. 119.

Petition by Railway Companies for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 11 January 1983.
EXHIBIT 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Arkados Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Larry L Crawford, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
  /s/ Larry L Crawford





Larry L Crawford


Chief Financial Officer


September 13, 2010
#### STATE v. PEELE

No. 67 PC.

Case below: 16 N.C. App. 227.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 December 1972.
exv4w2





Exhibit 4.2




COMPANY ORDER







Pursuant to the provisions of the Indenture dated October 23, 1995 between Advanta Corp. (the
“Company”) and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank (formerly, The
Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.)), successor trustee, the Company hereby issues this Company Order to be
effective concurrent with the effective date of the Registration Statement on Form
S-3/A being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or
about August 21, 2009.







The terms and conditions applicable to the following securities shall be as set forth in the
Company’s prospectus, and any applicable prospectus supplement, relating to such securities:



RediReserve Variable Rate Certificates



Investment Notes with Maturities of 91 Days to Ten Years




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	Advanta Corp.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	


	Dated
as of August 21, 2009

	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ Philip M. Browne
 

Philip M. Browne
	 	 
	


	[Corporate Seal]

Officer

	 	 	 	 	 	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ Jay A. Dubow	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	Jay A. Dubow 


Secretary	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Attest:
	 	/s/ Liane Browne	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	Liane Browne

Assistant Secretary
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kellwood Company (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended October 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the
undersigned hereby individually certify that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

         and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
         of the Company as of and for the period covered in the Report.





/s/ Robert C. Skinner, Jr.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert C. Skinner, Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

December 6, 2006



/s/ W. Lee Capps III
------------------------------------------------------------------------
W. Lee Capps III, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

December 6, 2006
Case 1:06-cv-15140-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

----------------------------------------------------------------x

Guy Zammitt

Plaintiffs,

- against -

NOMURA HOLDING AMERICA INC. and

NOMURA SECURITIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

et al. (see Defendants’ List)

Defendants.

Index No.: 06-cv-15155-AKH

(AKH)

NOTICE OF THE NOMURA

PARTIES’ ADOPTION OF

ANSWER TO MASTER

COMPLAINT

_________________________

1:21-MC-00102

----------------------------------------------------------------x

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby appears as

attorneys for Nomura Holding America INC. and Nomura Securities

International, Inc., in this action.

Dated: November 1, 2007

New York, New York

Yours, etc.

STRONGIN ROTHMAN & ABRAMS, LLP

s/ Dror M. Bikel

________________________________

Dror M. Bikel, ESQ.

Attorneys for Defendant

NOMURA HOLDING AMERICA, INC.

50 Broadway, Suite 2003

New York, NY 10004

(212) 931-8300

Case 1:06-cv-15155-AKH Document 18 Filed 11/07/2007 Page 1 of 3
TO:

SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST

Case 1:06-cv-15155-AKH Document 18 Filed 11/07/2007 Page 2 of 3
SERVICE LIST

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern , LLP

Attorneys for the: Plaintiff(s)

Office and Post Office Address and Telephone

115 Broadway, Twelfth Floor

New York, NY 10006

(212) 267-3700

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

ROBERT A. GROCHOW, P.C

233 Broadway, 5

th

Floor

New York, NY 10279

(212) 608-4400

rgrochow@aol.com

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

LAW OFFICES OF GREGORY J. CANNATA

233 Broadway, 5

th

Floor

New York, NY 10279

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs

(212) 553-9206

cannata@cannatalaw.com

Case 1:06-cv-15155-AKH Document 18 Filed 11/07/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-15116-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-15116-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-15116-AKH Document 11 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-15155-AKH Document 26 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:06-cv-15155-AKH Document 26 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 2
**Significant      Subsidiaries of the Registrant**

|   |                                             |   |                     |   | State                  of |     |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|---------------------------|----------|
|   | Company                                          |   | %                  Owned |   | Incorporation             |     |
|   |                                             |   |                     |   |                      |     |   |
| 1)     | J                  Net Ventures I, LLC           |   | 100.0%                   |   |                      | Delaware | Inactive |
|   |                                             |   |                     |   |                      |     |   |
| 2)     | J                  Net Holdings, LLC             |   | 100.0%                   |   |                      | Nevada   | Inactive |
|   |                                             |   |                     |   |                      |     |   |
| 3)     | IW                  Holdings, Inc.               |   | 100.0%                   |   |                      | Delaware | Inactive |
|   |                                             |   |                     |   |                      |     |   |
| 4)     | Epoch                  Investment Partners, Inc. |   | 100.0%                   |   |                      | Delaware |   |
|   |                                             |   |                     |   |                      |     |   |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

LISA-ATHENA S. ABU HANTASH, in her 

individual capacity and as mother and natural 

guardian of JORDAN-ANNETTEE JAZZMIN 

RICHARDSON, a minor, and JORDAN 

RICHARDSON, INC., a Virginia Corporation, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 

-against- 

 

V MODEL MANAGEMENT NEW YORK, INC. 

and VNY MODEL MANAGEMENT, LLC, 

 

 Defendants. 

 Docket No.: 07 Civ. 3363 (GBD) (KNF) 

 

AFFIRMATION OF GAVIN I. 

HANDWERKER, ESQ. IN SUPPORT 

OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION 

(ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED) 

 GAVIN I. HANDWERKER, ESQ., an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the state 

and federal courts of New York affirms the following to be true under penalty of perjury: 

1. I am a principal of the law firm Nissenbaum Law Group, LLC, attorneys for the 

Plaintiffs, Lisa–Athena S. Abu Hantash, in her individual capacity and as mother and natural 

guardian of Jordan-Annettee Jazzmin Richardson, a minor, and Jordan Richardson, Inc. As such, 

I am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances surrounding the within matter. 

2. I submit this affirmation in support of Plaintiffs’ motion for the entry of an Order: 

(a) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f), striking certain portions of paragraphs 22, 34, 35, 36, 65, 

66, 67, 73, 75, 77, 79, 89, 98, 99, 109, 110, 111 and 134 of Defendants’ verified answer; (b) 

pursuant to Rule 12(f), striking Defendants’ Eighth Affirmative Defense; (c) pursuant to Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 11(c), ordering sanctions against the Defendants and their counsel for violating, inter alia, 

Rule 8 and Rule 11; (d) awarding attorney’s fees, costs and disbursements for the within motion; 

and, (f) granting such other, further and different relief as to this Court seems just, equitable and 

proper under the circumstances. 

Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 7-2 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 1 of 2
-2-

3. The within matter was commenced by the filing of a summons and verified 

complaint on April 30, 2007. A true and accurate copy of Plaintiffs’ complaint (without exhibits) 

is annexed hereto as Exhibit A. 

4. Service of the summons and complaint on Defendants V Model Management and 

VNY Model Management were effectuated on May 9, 2007 and May 2, 2007, respectively. 

5. On May 24, 2007, my office received a copy of Defendants’ verified answer, 

affirmative defenses and counterclaim. A true and accurate copy of Defendants’ verified answer, 

affirmative defenses and counterclaim are annexed hereto as Exhibit B. 

6. No prior application for the relief sought herein has been made to this or any other 

court of competent jurisdiction. 

 WHEREFORE it is respectfully requested that the court grant the within application in its 

entirety together with such other, further and different relief as to the Court seems just, equitable 

and proper under the circumstances. 

Affirmed: May 31, 2007 

 /S/ GAVIN I. HANDWERKER 

GAVIN I. HANDWERKER (GIH6191)

Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 7-2 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     FOR CURRENT FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
</LEGEND>
<CIK>0000056583
<NAME>KOLLMORGEN CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           8,951
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,427
<ALLOWANCES>                                       584
<INVENTORY>                                     29,914
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,850
<PP&E>                                         112,772
<DEPRECIATION>                                  83,237
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173,693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,339
<BONDS>                                         29,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,945
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,661
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   173,693
<SALES>                                        108,268
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               119,383
<CGS>                                           76,624
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   84,877
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,278
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,914
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,462)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (580)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (882)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (882)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.09)

<FN>
(1)  EPS - Primary represents Earnings per share - Basic per SFAS 128
     EPS - Diluted represents Earnings per share - Diluted per SFAS 128

</FN>




</TABLE>