alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

# Soldier Accounted For From World War II (Alexander, R.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Case 1:07-cv-03359-NRB Document 2 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### McCAULEY v. AUSTIN

No. 562P82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 821.

Petition by defendants Thomas for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 December 1982.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [UT-030-06-1610—PH-241A] 

# AGENCY:

Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (GSENM), Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Department of the Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Cancellation of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Advisory Committee (GSENMAC) Meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Advisory Committee (GSENMAC) meeting scheduled for November 15 and 16, 2005 is cancelled. 

# DATES:

Two days of meetings were scheduled for November 15 and 16, 2005, at the GSENM Visitor Center, Conference Room, 745 HWY 89 East, Kanab, Utah. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Larry Crutchfield, Public Affairs Officer, GSENM Headquarters Office, 190 East Center, Kanab, Utah 84741; phone (435) 644-4310, or email                         *larry_crutchfield@blm.gov*.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the GSENMAC was scheduled to meet on November 15 and 16, 2005, in Kanab, Utah, at the GSENM Visitor Center, 745 HWY 89 East, Kanab, Utah. The meeting has been cancelled and will be rescheduled at a later date. 

Dated: November 10, 2005. 

Dave Hunsaker, 

Monument Manager, Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. 

[FR Doc. 05-22787 Filed 11-16-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-P
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 10-8 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 10-8 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 10-8 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### MUNCHAK CORP. v. CALDWELL

No. 147 PC.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 652.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 26 June 1975.
Unassociated Document








MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT









 

WHEREAS., OxySure Systems, Tug, ("OxySure") and Julian T, Ross ("Ross") (OxySure and Ross jointly, the "Parties") entered into that certain Employment Agreement ("Agreement"'') dated January 15,2009; and





WHEREAS, The Parties have agreed that it is in their best interests to modify the terms of the Agreement.





NOW, WHEREFORE, FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, THE SUFFICIENCY OF WHICH IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:





Exhibit A, Section 2(b) - "Financing Bonus" shall be removed, and Exhibit A, Section 2(b) shall read as follows:

 

(b) Annual Bonus: Sales Bonus: The company will pay a Sales Bonus (the "Sales Bonus") at the end of the Term if the company achieves certain Target Net Revenues ("TNR") during the 2009 Fiscal Year (January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009), in accordance with the
following: (i) If TNR is < $1,0 million, then the Sales Bonus is zero; (ii) If TNR is between $1.0 million and $2.0 million, then the Sales Bonus is $75,000; (iv) If TNR is between $2.0 million and $3.0 million, then the Sales Bonus is $100,000; or (v) If TNR is greater than $3.0 million, then the Sales Bonus is $125,000 plus 1% of TNR in excess of $3.0 million. Stock Performance Bonus: The company will pay a Stock Performance Bonus
(the "Stock Performance Bonus"), which shall be paid in unrestricted shares of Common Stock of the Company or in Cash, at the Executive's sole discretion, in accordance with the following: If the Company's stock price maintains a 6-month average during any period in the Term of $1.50 or higher, then the Stock Performance Bonus shall be $100,000.





 



	 	 	 	 	 
	
By: /s/   
	 	 	
By:  /s/   
	 
	
Mr.Don Reed, Director 
	 	 	
Mr.Julian Ross, Executive
	 
	For: OxySure Systems, Inc. 	 	 	 	 
	
Date: 6-23-09
	 	 	
Date: 6-23-09
Case 1:06-cv-14948-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03008-PKC-RLE Document 12 Filed 08/22/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03008-PKC-RLE Document 12 Filed 08/22/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03008-PKC-RLE Document 12 Filed 08/22/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### STATE v. JOHNSON

No. 20.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 53.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 February 1974.
Submitted on record and briefs June 30, 1998,

reversed March 10, 1999

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*PAUL LESLIE OVENS, *Appellant.*

(96D109281; CA A98082)

976 P2d 573

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Hari Nam S. Khalsa, Deputy Public Defender, filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Robert B. Rocklin, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Warren, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM

Reversed. *State v. Brust,*158 Or App 455, 974 P2d 734 (1999).
#### BLACK v. BLACK

No. 45 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 403.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 October 1976. Appeal dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question 5 October 1976.
Construction

Toolbox Talk Eye Protection

Eye injuries from dust and particles, welding light, and 

chemicals are common on jobsites. Often these injuries 

occur because workers are wearing the wrong eye 

protection or none at all. Although some eye injuries 

are minor, even a simple scratch from wood, cement, 

or drywall dust can cause lasting pain. Metal slivers 

from a grinding wheel or rebounding nails from routine 

hammering and carpentry can puncture the eye and 

lead to vision loss. Welding light can cause “welders’ 

flash” that burns eyes and surrounding tissue. Nearby 

workers and bystanders are also at risk. Work-related eye 

injuries can have life-long consequences. 

William’s Story 

William was hand-grinding a small section of a 

cement floor. He had not been provided with safety 

glasses. William was finishing up the job when he 

felt a sharp pain in his right eye. 

# What caused this incident? 

# How could this have been prevented?

# Have you ever suffered a work-related eye injury, 

or do you know someone who has? If so, what 

happened? 

Remember This 

• Identify eye hazards before you start work. 

• Always wear the correct eye protection for those hazards. 

• Wear safety glasses marked with “Z87+” on the frame 

or lenses, as an indicator of impact protection.

• Use vented goggles for dust, such as cement dust, and 

non-vented goggles for chemicals.

• Use face shields with safety glasses or goggles for 

protection from flying objects or chemical splashes.

• When welding, use a welding helmet or goggles with 

the correct lens shade for the job (shade 10–14 for arc 

welding; 4–8 for gas welding; and 3–6 for torch brazing). 

Helpers and bystanders also need UV protection. 

• Take care of your eye protection and replace it when 

damaged.

• Do not rub your eyes if injured by small particles such 

as wood, cement or drywall dust, or chemicals. Use the 

eyewash station. Rinse with clean water for at least 15 

to 20 minutes. 

• Get medical help for cuts, punctures, and objects in 

the eyes such as metal slivers, rebounding nails, or 

wood shavings. Do not wash out your eyes or try to 

remove objects yourself.

How can we stay safe today?

What will we do at the worksite to prevent eye injuries?

OSHA Standard: 1926.102
Construction

Toolbox Talk Eye Protection

; Make sure your safety eyewear has “Z87+” marked on the frame or a lens, indicating its impact resistance.

; Wear the correct eye protection for the hazard present. 

; If small dust particles or chemicals get in your eye, use the eyewash station. Rinse with clean water for at least 15 to 20 minutes. Do 

not rub your eyes.

; Get medical help for cuts, punctures, and objects in your eyes such as metal slivers or wood shavings. Do not wash out your eyes or try to 

remove the object yourself.

CDC/NIOSH INFO: 1-800-CDC-INFO (1-800-232-4636) | TTY: 1-800-232-6348 | cdc.gov/info | cdc.gov/niosh

CPWR: Contact 301-578-8500 I cpwr-r2p@cpwr.com | www.cpwr.com/toolbox-talks

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2022-136 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB2022136 | August 2022

GET 

INFORMATION
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 87 Filed 10/23/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 87 Filed 10/23/2007 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERUNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the filing by ARTISTdirect, Inc. (the“Registrant”) of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,2008 (the “Annual Report”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I,Dimitri Villard, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheAnnual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Date:     April 15,  2009 | By:    | /s/ DIMITRI VILLARD           |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                                               |   | Dimitri Villard               |
|                                               |   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|                                               |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
EXHIBIT 11

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE                                       SHARES

Basic shares outstanding at March 31, 1999                    1,950,046

 NET EARNINGS                            $1,179,879          $.60 per share
--------------                           ----------
Basic shares outstanding                  1,950,046

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE                                     SHARES
--------------------------                                     ------

Basic shares outstanding at March 31, 1999                    1,950,046
Stock Options-common stock equivalents                           98,690
Diluted shares outstanding at March 31, 1999                  2,048,736

NET EARNINGS                             $1,179,879          $.57 per share
--------------                           ----------
Diluted shares outstanding                2,048,736
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Mark Buckrey, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of Sterion Incorporated;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date  December 28, 2004 | /s/ Mark Buckrey       
|----------------------- | -----------------------
|                        | Chief Financial Officer
#### HEARNE v. SMITH

No. 94 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 111.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 November 1974.
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-6 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 1 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-6 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 2 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-6 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 3 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-6 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 4 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-6 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 5 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-6 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 6 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-6 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 7 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-6 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 8 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-6 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 9 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-6 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 10 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-6 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 11 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-6 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 12 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-6 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 13 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-6 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 14 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-6 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 15 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-6 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 16 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-6 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 17 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 6-6 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 18 of 18
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JOHNNY FRAZIER

No. 22

(Filed 10 October 1973)

Appeal by defendant from *Grist, J.,*at the 2 April 1973 Regular Schedule B Session of Mecklenburg Superior Court.

*Attorney General Robert' Morgan and Special Counsel Ralph Moody for the State.*

*Edward T. Cook for defendant appellant.*

Per Curiam.

On 14 March 1973, this Court remanded this cáse to the Superior Court of Mecklenburg County for judgment imposing a life sentence for the first degree murder of Carla Jean Underwood. *State v. Frazier,*283 N.C. 99, 195 S.E. 2d 33. Judge Grist pronounced judgment in exact accord with the directions of this Court in its order of remand. Upon defendant’s appeal therefrom, the judgment pronounced by Judge Grist is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 18 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 18 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 18 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 18 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 18 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 18 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 6 of 6
#### STATE v. PEVIA

No. 245 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 79.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 October 1976. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 October 1976.
EXHIBIT C

Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 42-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 42-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 42-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      on Form 10-Q of Katy Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending
      September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the “Report”), I, Amir Rosenthal, Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/
      Amir Rosenthal


Amir
      Rosenthal


Chief
      Financial Officer


November
      13, 2007











The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany this report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not
      to
      be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company whether made before
      or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language
      in
      such filing.  A signed original of this written statement required by
      Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
      adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
      of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
      Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:06-cv-15078-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-14963-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1