alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10_7.htm




[ * ] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





Exhibit 10.7





AGREEMENT SUMMARY





On April 13, 2009, Procera Networks, Inc. entered into an oral agreement with Continuous Computing Corporation of San Diego, California to substantially outsource Procera’s operations and logistics functions, formerly handled in Procera’s Los Gatos, California facility, to Continuous Computing.  Under the terms of the
agreement, Continuous Computing will receive an up-front payment from Procera of $[ * ] and will be compensated by Procera based on an hourly rate of $[ * ] and/or fixed fee based on the existing OEM agreement between Procera and Continuous Computing for ATCA systems, or equipment price plus [ * ]% markup for non-ATCA systems, to load Procera’s software into servers and other hardware devices, perform testing and inspection services and ship directly to Procera’s customers.  Following an
initial evaluation period, the parties may, in their mutual discretion, negotiate a definitive written agreement.
Autumn Run - First Amendment

 
Exhibit 10.48

 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE CONTRACT
 
 
 
            This First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Contract (this “Amendment”) is made as of August 5, 2009 between
CENTURY PROPERTIES GROWTH FUND XXII, LP, a Delaware limited partnership ("Seller") and
AUTUMN RUN APARTMENTS, LLC (“Purchaser”).
 
W I T N E S S E T H:
            
WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser entered into that certain Purchase and Sale Contract, dated as of July 15, 2009, with respect to the sale of certain property described therein (the “
Agreement”); and
            
WHEREAS, Sellers and Purchaser desire to amend certain provisions of the Agreement.
            
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the sum of $10.00 and other good and valuable consideration, the mutual receipt and legal sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:


1.      
Capitalized Terms.     Capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the meanings given to them in the Agreement, except as expressly otherwise defined herein.


2.      
Feasibility Period.      The Feasibility Period, set forth in Section 3.1 of the Agreement, is hereby extended to 5:00 pm (EST) on August 7, 2009.


3.      
Loan Assumption Application Submittal Deadline.  The Loan Assumption Application Submittal Deadline, set forth in Section 4.5.3 of the Agreement, is hereby extended to 5:00 pm (EST) on August 7, 2009.


4.      
Miscellaneous.           This Amendment (a)  supersedes all prior oral or written communications and agreement between or among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and (b) may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute a single instrument and may be delivered by facsimile transmission, and any such facsimile transmitted Amendment shall have the same force and effect, and be as binding, as if original signatures had been delivered.  As modified hereby, all the terms of the Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed and shall continue in full force and effect.

[Signature Page to Follow]




            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date and year hereinabove written.

 
 
Seller:
  

CENTURY PROPERTIES GROWTH FUND XXII, LP, a Delaware limited partnership

 
 By:  FOX PARTNERS IV, a California general partnership, its general partner

 
 By:  FOX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a California corporation, its general partner

 
 By: 
/s/John Spiegleman
 Name:  John Spiegleman

Title:  Senior Vice President

 
 Purchaser:


AUTUMN RUN APARTMENTS, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company


By:  10 BOULEVARD LLC, a New York limited liability company, its sole member

By:  /s/ Peter S. Fazio

Name: Peter S. Fazio
Title:  Managing Member
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT .......... SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ...................................................... X 

IN RE: Fosarnas Products LiabiIity 

Litigation 1 :06-md-1789 (JFK) 

ORDER 

Tilts Document Re1art.s to: All Actions 

SEE ATTACHED 

Case 1:07-cv-03462-JFK Document 8 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03462-JFK Document 8 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 29, 2023

NO. 03

- 23

- 00350

- CV

Rickye Henderson, Top & Ball Properties, LLC, and Curtis Meeks , Appellant s

v.

Ali Arabzadegan , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COU RT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on May 30, 2023 . Having reviewed the

record , the Court holds that Rickye Henderson, Top & Ball Properties, LLC, and Curtis Meeks

ha ve not prosecuted their appeal and did not comply with a notic e f rom the C lerk of this C ourt

.

Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of prosecution. The appell ants shall pay all

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 17-10      Filed 02/01/2005     Page 1 of 3

Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 17-10      Filed 02/01/2005     Page 2 of 3

Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 17-10      Filed 02/01/2005     Page 3 of 3
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (3.29 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (4.25 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### CONGLETON v. CITY OF ASHEBORO

No. 117 PC.

Case below: 8 N.C. App. 571.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 July 1970.
#### STATE v. WARREN

No. 676PA82.

Case below: 59 N.C. App. 264.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 8 February 1983.
<TABLE>
Five-Year Financial Summary
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             2002       2001       2000      1999          1998
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands except per share amounts)

					      <c>	 <c>        <c>       <c>           <c>

Revenues                                   $501,177   $532,061   $690,454  $914,880    $1,005,007
Restructuring charges (credits)               2,106       (384)     8,498    15,596        15,343
Income  (loss) from operations                8,279      8,087    (23,641)  (67,440)     (100,998)
Patent litigation gain, net                 440,623        ---        ---       ---           ---
Gain on sales of assets                      17,214     11,243     49,546    13,223       112,533
Income (loss) from continuing operations    377,752     19,942     10,095   (78,561)       (6,728)
Discontinued operation (1)                      ---        ---        ---     6,984       (12,906)
Net income (loss)                           377,752     19,942     10,095   (71,577)      (19,634)
Net income (loss) from continuing
operations per share:
 Basic                                         7.87        .40        .20     (1.60)         (.14)
 Diluted                                       7.47        .39        .20     (1.60)         (.14)
Net income (loss) per share:
 Basic                                         7.87        .40        .20     (1.46)         (.41)
 Diluted                                       7.47        .39        .20     (1.46)         (.41)
Working capital                             520,728    177,638    184,051   168,307       216,520
Total assets                                835,640    458,010    514,908   584,944       695,974
Total debt                                      169      3,733     31,030    62,926        83,213
Shareholders' equity                        621,710    295,213    278,000   276,700       355,332


(1) In 1999, the Company sold its VeriBest, Inc. business segment to Mentor Graphics  Corporation.
The 1999 amount  includes  the  gain  on  the  sale  of  discontinued  operations.   See Note 4 of
Notes to  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  contained  in  the  Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K  for  the year ended December 31, 2001, for a complete discussion  of  this  transaction  and
its impact on the Company's results of operations and financial position.


Information contained in this report may include  statements  that  are  forward-looking as defined
in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Actual results could differ materially from
those projected in  the forward-looking statements.  Additional information concerning factors that
could  cause  actual results  to differ materially from those in the forward-looking  statements is
contained in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"
in this Annual Report.
</TABLE>
#### SYNCO, INC. v. HEADEN

No. 288PC

Case below: 47 N.C. App. 109

Petitions by plaintiffs and defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 October 1980.
Case 1:07-cr-00357-CM Document 43 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.3

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Thomas J. Madden, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of PFSweb, Inc.; and

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 

 

|        |        |                         |        |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | By:    | /s/Thomas J. Madden     |   |
|   |   | Thomas J. Madden        |   |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

Date: April 30, 2018
Case 1:07-cv-03251-JSR Document 9 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 10



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-56878) on Form F-3 of Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd of our
report dated February 1, 2002, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets
of Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2000 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive income (loss), shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, and our report dated
February 1, 2002, with respect to the balance sheets of Silicon Manufacturing
Partners Pte Ltd as of December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, and the related profit
and loss accounts, statements of changes in equity and cash flows for the three
years ended December 31, 2001, which reports appear in the December 31, 2001
annual report on Form 20-F of Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd.






KPMG
Singapore



March 11, 2002
#### LEASING, INC. v. DAN-CLEVE CORP.

No. 15.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 18.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals improvidently granted 6 May 1975 (reported 287 N.C. 260) is denied 30 July 1975.
Exhibit 10.2 






[NFEI LETTERHEAD] 




Samyak Veera
07-95A
Ubi Techpark
10 Ubi Crescent

Singapore 



	 	                  Re:  	Compensation
for consulting services and use of funds 







Dear Mr. Veera, 



        This
letter will confirm the agreement under which New Frontier Energy, Inc. has agreed to pay
you compensation for certain consulting services previously rendered by you to the Company
and as a structuring fee relating to the $500,000 that was required to be placed into a
segregated account in order to close the Entek transaction. 



        As
compensation for both the consulting services and as a structuring fee as discussed above,
the Company has agreed to grant you a restricted stock award of 2,056,500 shares of the
Company’s Common Stock. The Restricted Stock Award Notice of Grant is attached hereto
as Exhibit A. The Company has also agreed to grant you a two-year option to acquire
1,250,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a price of $0.20 per share. The
Stock Option Grant Award Notice is attached hereto as Exhibit B. Please execute both the
Restricted Stock Award Notice of Grant and the Stock Option Grant Award Notice
acknowledging the terms and conditions of such grants and the plan under which they were
granted and return them to me at the address above. 



        If
you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (303) 730-9994, ext. 225. 




Sincerely, 





/s/ Paul G. Laird

Paul G. Laird
Chief
Executive Officer  




Enclosures
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Katy Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending July 1, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James W. Shaffer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ James W. Shaffer









The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany this report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32(b)Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350I, Mark J. Plush, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Keithley Instruments, Inc.(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2005which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Mark J. Plush Mark J. Plush
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restricti ons on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations fr om the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEX ICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3

v. No. 34,149 4 CONRAD VILLEGAS, JR., 5 Defendant-Appellant, 6
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LUNA COUNTY 7 Daniel Viramontes, District Judge 8 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 9 Margaret McLean, Assistant Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM 11 for Appellee 12 Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defender 13 Will O’Connell, Assistan t Appellate Defender 14 Santa Fe, NM 15 for Appellant 16
MEMORANDUM OPINION 17 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. 182 {1} Defendant contends that he receive d an illegal sentence when, following a 1 probation violation, the trial court did not credit him with the time he served while 2 incarcerated on his original sentence. [DS 5] Our notice agreed with Defendant and 3 proposed to reverse and remand for resentencing. 4 {2} The State has responded to our notice, indicating that the State does not oppose 5 our proposed disposition. [MIO 2] Additionally, we note that the State suggests that 6 Defendant is entitled to 365 days of credit, as opposed to 364 days, as provided in our 7 notice. [MIO 2; DS 5; CN 2] 8 {3} Accordingly, for the reasons detailed in our notice and discussed above, we 9 reverse and remand to the district court for resentencing. 10 {4} IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12

_______________________________________ 13 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 14 WE CONCUR: 15
16 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge 17
18 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 19