alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 224 (Tuesday, November 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 70623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23041]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 2005N-0343]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Guidance for Requesting an Extension 
to Use Existing Label Stock After the Trans Fat Labeling Effective Date 
of January 1, 2006

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Guidance for Requesting an 
Extension to Use Existing Label Stock after the Trans Fat Labeling 
Effective Date of January 1, 2006'' has been approved by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(the PRA). Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is 
publishing a notice announcing an opportunity for public comment on 
this collection of information. Since this collection received 
emergency approval that expires on January 1, 2006, FDA is following 
the normal PRA clearance procedures by issuing that notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Robbins, Office of Management 
Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of September 1, 2005 
(70 FR 52108), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0571. 
The approval expires on January 31, 2006. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: November 14, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-23041 Filed 11-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

---------------------------------------------------------------------X 

YVES ETIENNE, 

Plaintiff,

-againstTHE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., 

Defendants.

---------------------------------------------------------------------X 

07 Civ. 3361 (LAK) 

PROOF OF SERVICE

ROSE M. WEBER, an attorney duly admitted to practice in the State of New 

York and this Court, declares under penalty of perjury and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746 that the 

following statements are true. 

I am over 18 years of age and am not a party to this action. 

That on April 30, 2007, at 1:00 p.m., at the office of the Corporation Counsel of 

the City of New York, 100 Church Street, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10007, I served a Summons 

and Complaint upon the City of New York, defendant therein named, by delivering and leaving 

one true copy of the Summons and Complaint with Madelyn Santana personally. Declarant 

knew said individual to be authorized to accept service on behalf of defendant City of New York. 

Dated: New York, New York 

April 30, 2007 

By: /s 

Rose M. Weber (RW 0515) 

Case 1:07-cv-03361-LAK Document 2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-30412 Summary Calendar

RODNEY SANDERS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(No. 94-CV-1173-D)

January 8, 1996
Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, AND BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Rodney Sanders appeals from the district court's order

dismissing his medical malpractic e action, filed pursuant to the

Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2871, et seq., following a

non-jury trial. Sanders argues that the district court erred in

finding that he gave his informed consent to ear surgery. He also

argues that he did not consent to Dr. Stephen Metzinger as the

primary surgeon.2

Sander s' appeal raises challenges to the district court's

factual findings, which are reviewed only for clear error. Fed. R.

C iv. P. 52(a). This Court will set aside such findings only if,

based on the entire record, we are left with the definite and firm

conviction that a mistake has been made. B urlington Northern v.

Office of Inspector General , 983 F.2d 631, 639 (5th Cir. 1993).

Our review of t he record reveals that the district court's

findings of fact and conclusions of law were not clearly erroneous.

Accordingly, the district court's judgment of dismissal is

AFFIRMED.
#### STATE v. COX

No. 3 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 457.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 29 August 1978. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 29 August 1978.
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)

I, Philip Kives, certify that:

1.               I have reviewed this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 of K-tel International, Inc.;

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

a.               Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b.              Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c.               Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a.               All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.              Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 22, 2006 |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
|                    | /s/ Philip Kives |   |
|                    | Philip Kives |
|                    | President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Case 1:06-cv-14999-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
LIHIHX3 V

Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 21-2 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 2
lli: Veval v. KeprnterSubject: RE: Deval v. Repinter -

From: "UNGER, MICHAEL E." <UNGER@freehil1.com>

Date: Fri, 1 Jun 200717:22:08 -0400

To: <mmarlowe@keaneandmarlowe.com>

Dear Mary Ann,

Pursuant to the local court rules, we provide you notice that a payment

being sent by Miachart to Seacape Shipping, Inc. in the sum of

$223,000.00 was restrained at Bank of America on May 31.

Regards,

Mike Unger

Freehill Hogan & Mahar, LLP

80 Pine Street

New York, NY 10005-1759

Tel: (212) 425-1900

Fax: (212) 425-1901

Cell: (516) 857-0535

---------------------------------------------

PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this message is privileged and

confidential, and is intended only for the use of the individual named above and

others who have been specifically authorized to receive such. If you are not the

intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or

copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this

communication in error, or if any problems occur with transmission, please notify

us immediatelyby telephone- (212) 425-1900. Thankyou.

Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 21-2 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. SAMUELS

No. 129 PC.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 493.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 27 January 1982.
#### National Printing and Engraving Company v. Patrick J. Cook et al.

1. *"Verdicts—Conflicting*Testimony.—When a cause is tried before a jury upon conflicting testimony, the verdict is conclusive.

Memorandum.—Assumpsit. Appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding. Submitted at the October term, 1894.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 5, 1895.

Defrees, Brace *&*Bitter, attorneys for appellant.

Edward Maher and Charles C. Gilbert, attorneys for appellees.

Mr. Presiding Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was an action to recover for plumbing and gas fitting done by appellee for appellant.

So far as the plumbing is concerned, appellee once proposed to put in appellant’s building, ten closets, five urinals and five sinks for $420.

After this, appellee put in four closets, two urinals and two sinks, and for this charged, and has been allowed, $449.03, being $29.03 more than the sum for .which he proposed to put in ten closets, five urinals and five sinks.

Appellee has also recovered $153.60 for thirty-two days time of gas fitters. Appellant testified that the gas fitters idled away their time loafing and drinking beer.

The case was tried without a jury, and upon the conflicting testimony, appellee testifying that the prices charged were fair and reasonable, and that appellant had repeatedly promised to pay the bill, which promise appellant denies, we can not reverse the judgment. Appellee’s proposal was neither accepted nor. acted upon. Better work and material may have been given than would have been the case under the proposed contract. The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          18,501 
<SECURITIES>                                     2,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,902
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,297
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,646
<PP&E>                                          91,244
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,027
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,741
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           823
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,019
<SALES>                                         42,381
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,381
<CGS>                                           32,579
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,946
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,836
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (320)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (109)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (211)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (211)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Herbert Lindo, certify that:

 

1.                                       I have reviewed this quarter annualreport on Form 10-Q of Kenilworth Systems Corporation for the period ended June30, 2003;

 

2.                                       Based on my knowledge, this quarterannual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements are made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this quarter annual report;

 

3.                                       Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarter annualreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarter annual report;

 

4.                                       As registrant’s certifying officer I amresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and Ihave:

 

a)                                      designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarter annualreport is being prepared;

 

b)                                     evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 daysprior to the filing date of this quarter annual report (August 14, 2003); and

 

c)                                      presented in this quarter annual reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures based on my evaluation as of August 14, 2003;

 

5.                                       All significant deficiencies in thedesign or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial dataand have identified for the registrant’s auditor any material weaknesses ininternal controls; and

 

a)                                      any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.                                       The registrant’s other officers and Ihave indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significantchanges in internal controls or in other factors that could significantlyaffect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most  recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
| Date:  August 14,  2003 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Herbert Lindo                      |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                         |   |   |   | President and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

----
Case 1:06-cv-15092-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15092-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15092-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15092-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15092-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15092-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15092-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15092-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15092-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15092-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15092-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15092-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15092-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
#### INSURANCE CO. v. KNIGHT

No. 54 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 96.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 November 1977.
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 22-3 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 1 of 7
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 22-3 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 2 of 7
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 22-3 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 3 of 7
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 22-3 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 4 of 7
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 22-3 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 5 of 7
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 22-3 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 6 of 7
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 22-3 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 7 of 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-28-1998
<CASH>                                             350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      568
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,060
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,254
<PP&E>                                           9,609
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,757
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,561
<BONDS>                                          2,313
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              983
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           493
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,549
<SALES>                                         23,273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,273
<CGS>                                           18,198
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 220
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    286
<INCOME-TAX>                                        83
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                165
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       165
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. JOYNER

No. 24 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 447.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 September 1975.
Certificate of Trust of S&T Capital Trust III



 Exhibit (4)(l) 
 CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF 
 S&T CAPITAL TRUST III 
 THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST of S&T Capital Trust III (the “Trust”) is being duly executed and filed by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Delaware,
a Delaware banking corporation, as trustee, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. Section 3801 et seq.). 
 1. Name. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is “S&T Capital Trust III”. 
 2.
Delaware Trustee. The name and address of the trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware are Deutsche Bank Trust Company Delaware, 1011 Centre Road, Suite 200 Wilmington, Delaware 19805. 
 3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective on August 6, 2003. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the sole trustee of the Trust, has executed this Certificate of Trust. 
  

			
	 Deutsche Bank Trust Company Delaware,
 not in
its individual capacity, but solely as
 trustee

		
	By:	 	/s/ Donna Mitchell
	Name:	 	Donna Mitchell
	Title:	 	Vice President
Case 1:07-cv-03402-LAP-RLE Document 5 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) In connection with the Annual Report of Intergraph Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R.
Halsey Wise, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. By:
    
    /s/ R. Halsey WiseName:
    
    R. Halsey WiseTitle:
    
    President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    November 8, 2004
 [A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Intergraph Corporation and will be retained by Intergraph
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.]
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD     Document 24-6      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 1 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD     Document 24-6      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 2 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD     Document 24-6      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 3 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD     Document 24-6      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 4 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD     Document 24-6      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 5 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD     Document 24-6      Filed 06/19/2007     Page 6 of 6
#### THOMPSON v. WATKINS

No. 38 PC.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 717.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 2 April 1974.
# Soldier Accounted For From Korean War (Hummel, J.)

/ Published Dec. 17, 2019
WASHINGTON,