alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Katy Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending April 1, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James W. Shaffer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ James W. Shaffer


James W. Shaffer


Chief Financial Officer


May 16, 2011











The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany this report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 5 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 5 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 5 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 5 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 5 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 5 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 5 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 5 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 5 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 5 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 5 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 11 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 7-4 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 7-4 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 7-4 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 7-4 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 9-13 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 9-13 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 9-13 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 3 of 3
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Dawson Geophysical Company (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I Christina W. Hagan, Executive Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated December 8, 2004 /s/        Christina W. HaganExecutive Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer andChief Financial Officer
Case 7:07-cv-03232-CS-LMS Document 17 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 7:07-cv-03232-CS-LMS Document 17 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 2 of 2
U.S. Department of Labor 

September 3, 2009 

Employment Standards Administration 

Office of Workers' Compensation Programs 

Oivision o'. Longshore and 

Harbor Workers' Cornoensation 

Washington, D.C. 202·10 

File Number· 

INDUSTRY NOTICE No. 128 TO INSURANCE CARRIERS AND SELF-INSURED 

EMPLOYERS LONGSHORE AND HARBOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION ACT AND 

EXTENSIONS 

SUBJECT: COMMUNICATION AND POINTS OF CONTACT 

Current economic realities have caused corporate restructurings, 

downsizings, consolidations and office closings throughout the 

insurance and maritime industries. Each authorized carrier and 

self-insurer under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' 

Compensation Act and its extensions must keep both the 

OWCP/DLHWC National Office and the relevant District Offices 

informed of all such changes. 

We believe that delays in communications, reporting, mailings, 

dispute resolutions, and filings have resulted because changes 

in corporate structure and claims management assignments have 

not been reported. When the Division of Longshore and Harbor 

Workers' Compensation receives inquiries about a claim from 

claimants, employers, health care providers, attorneys and 

others it is important that we are able to quickly include the 

proper insurance claims managers in the communications. When we 

issue industry notices and other communications, we want to 

ensure that you receive such mailing timely. 

The DLHWC requests that you notify both the OWCP/DLHWC National 

Office and the relevant District Offices as soon as possible 

about: 

• A name, phone number and email address for all matters 

relating to: 

o Compliance and regulatory matters; and 

o Claims management, both national (and regional if 

appropriate). 

• All changes in corporate structure, such as mergers or 

acquisitions or the transfer of portfolios of claims. 

Reporting to your domiciliary regulator is not sufficient. 

• All changes in claims handling assignments with as much 

advance warning as possible. Please provide contact 
• details including the name and phone number of the adjuster 

in charge. 

These steps will allow us to keep you timely informed of 

information, inquiries, reports and orders and will allow us to 

include you promptly in claim resolution efforts and other 

communications. 

Please contact the DLHWC National Office for any questions about 

corporate matters and compliance, and your nearest District 

Director with any questions about claims management. The 

correct mailing addresses can be found on our website at 

http://www.dol.gov/esa/owcp/dlhwc/lscontac.htm. 

If you have any questions relating to this notice, please 

contact John A. Chamberlain of office on 202-693-0925 or 

Fax 202-693-1380. Thank you for your cooperation. 

Jtu;&JL.-

MICHAEL NISS 

Director, Division of 

Longshore and Harbor 

Workers' Compensation
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 6 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6867

EMMETT MADISON GRAHAM, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus JOHN D. ASHCROFT, Attorney General; HARLEY G. LAPPIN; K. J. WENDT; JANET BUNTS, Health Care Administrator; ABDULMALEK SABBAGH, Cardiologist; M. L. VELTRI, Unit Manager; DORIS WILLIAMS, Doctor, Medical Director, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (2:05-cv-00089-REM) Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 17, 2007 Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Emmett Madison Graham, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Emmett Madison Graham, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Graham v. Ashcroft , No. 2:05-cv-00089-REM (N.D.W. Va. May 24, 2007). We deny Graham’s motions for appointment of counsel and to stay the case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE KUHLMAN SEPTEMBER 1998 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,911
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  123,735
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,473
<INVENTORY>                                     76,653
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               220,301
<PP&E>                                         240,078
<DEPRECIATION>                                 118,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 475,308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          143,935
<BONDS>                                         97,444
<COMMON>                                        16,889
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     186,821
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   475,308
<SALES>                                        571,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               571,100
<CGS>                                          439,631
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  439,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   305
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,840
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,703
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             28,576
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,576
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.64
        

</TABLE>
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 2 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 3 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 4 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 5 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 6 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 7 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 8 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 9 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 17-9 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 10 of 10
Case 1:06-cv-15065-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. PENLAND

No. 21.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 73.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 9 January 1974.
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 18-2 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 18-2 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 18-2 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### STATE v. DODD

No. 35 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 260.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 October 1976.
Case 1:07-cv-03384-JCF     Document 23      Filed 04/17/2008     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03384-JCF     Document 23      Filed 04/17/2008     Page 2 of 2
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1632 

To terminate the Diversity Immigrant Visa Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23 (legislative day, MAY 22), 2019 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To terminate the Diversity Immigrant Visa Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Visa Lottery Repeal 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF DIVERSITY IMMIGRANT VISA 

7 PROGRAM. 

8 (a) REPEAL.—Section 203 of the Immigration and 

9 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153) is amended by striking 

10 subsection (c). 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1632 IS

1 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

2 Title II of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

3 1151 et seq.) is amended— 

4 (1) in section 201— 

5 (A) in subsection (a)— 

6 (i) in paragraph (1), by adding ‘‘and’’ 

7 at the end; 

8 (ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘; 

9 and’’ and inserting a period; and 

10 (iii) by striking paragraph (3); and 

11 (B) by striking subsection (e); 

12 (2) in section 203— 

13 (A) by striking subsection (c); 

14 (B) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘sub15 section (a), (b), or (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub16 section (a) or (b)’’; 

17 (C) in subsection (e)— 

18 (i) by striking paragraph (2); and 

19 (ii) by redesignating paragraph (3) as 

20 paragraph (2); 

21 (D) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘sub22 section (a), (b), or (c) of this section’’ and in23 serting ‘‘subsection (a) or (b)’’; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 1632 IS

1 (E) in subsection (g), by striking ‘‘sub2 sections (a), (b), and (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub3 sections (a) and (b)’’; and 

4 (F) in subsection (h)(2)(B), by striking 

5 ‘‘subsection (a), (b), or (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub6 section (a) or (b)’’; and 

7 (3) in section 204— 

8 (A) in subsection (a)(1), by striking sub9 paragraph (I); 

10 (B) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘sub11 section (a), (b), or (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub12 section (a) or (b)’’; and 

13 (C) in subsection (l)(2)(B), by striking 

14 ‘‘section 203 (a) or (d)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub15 section (a) or (d) of section 203’’. 

16 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

17 The amendments made by section 2 shall take effect 

18 on the first day of the first fiscal year beginning on or 

19 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### STATE v. WIGGINS

No. 11.

Case below: 21 N.C. App. 441.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 1 July 1974.
Case 1:06-cv-15034-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 1 of 21Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 2 of 21Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 3 of 21Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 4 of 21Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 5 of 21Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 6 of 21Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 7 of 21Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 8 of 21Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 9 of 21Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 10 of 21Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 11 of 21Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 12 of 21Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 13 of 21Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 14 of 21Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 15 of 21Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 16 of 21Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 17 of 21Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 18 of 21Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 19 of 21Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 20 of 21Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 48 Filed 06/18/2008 Page 21 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 31 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 31 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1.07-cv-03343-RMB Document 17 F~led o~/MFM BgEflfJB 

LAW OFFICES OF 

AMBROSE WOTORSON 

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

Via ECF 

Honorable Judge Berman 

United States District Court 

Southern District of New York 

COURT STREET 

OKLYN, N.Y. 11242 GC 1- J (N v/OJ/@r 

02: 38 w @% ) b~b - 

C rluur*u b,m*t t' 

April 9,2008 

500 Pearl Street 

New York, New York 10007 

-. 

e: Vargas et al. v. M $#@ft$ifim~~

U.S.D. J. 

U 1 Lv. 3543 (KMLI) 

Dear Honorable Judge Berman: 

This office represents the plaintiffs in the above referenced action. 

We write to request a two (2) week extension of time from April 1 1,2008 to April 

25, 2008 in which to respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment in this 

matter. This is plaintiffs' first request for an extension of time to respond to defendant's 

motion for summary judgment. 

This is based on the fact that one of the plaintiffs in this action, Simon Norales, 

was out of the country until April 2, 2008 and has not had a chance to review Defendants' 

Motion for Summary Judgment documents. As well, we are attempting to contact another 

plaintiff, Felix Bonilla, who has not, as of this writing, returned our call, and who may 

also be out of the country temporarily. 

Although we have scheduled time with the plaintiffs to review defendants' 

motion, this office is unable to properly to respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary, 

without the benefit of all plaintiffs' input, on or before April 25, 2008. 

Accordingly, we have spoken with opposing counsel, Eric Stuart, Esq., who 

consents to this request to the extent that plaintiffs are granted until April 18, 2008 to 

respond, in light of the looming trial date of April 28, 2008. However, given our inability 

to confirm Mr. Bonilla's presence in the United States, we ask that the court alternatively, 

extend all the existing deadlines to accommodate the rearrangement of the motion 

schedule and our extension of time to respond. We have attached a Proposed Revised 

Scheduling Order stating the same. 

Respectfully, 

Is/ 

Ambrose W. Wotorson, Jr. (AWW -2412) 

cc: Eric Stuart, Esq. 

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 18 Filed 04/10/2008 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 12 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 12 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03236-JSR Document 12 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 3 of 3
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

No. 13-626C

(Filed September 22, 2014)

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

 *

 *

MICHAEL ROTH & ASSOCIATES, *

ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS, INC., *

 *

Plaintiff, *

 *

v. *

 *

THE UNITED STATES, *

 *

Defendant. *

 *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ORDER

Pending before the Court are plaintiff’s motions to compel production of 

documents and to enlarge the period of time in which to conduct discovery. As 

discussed during today’s oral hearing, the Court orders as follows:

Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to depose Mr. Clifford Farrell by written 

questions pursuant to RCFC 31(a)(2)(A)(ii). Plaintiff must serve written questions 

for Mr. Farrell on or by September 26, 2014. Defendant shall serve Mr. Farrell’s 

responses on or by October 10, 2014.

Regarding plaintiff’s requested deposition of Mr. Eric Miller, plaintiff is to file 

a supplemental paper with the Court on or by September 26, 2014, including any 

exhibits in support, and explaining his need for this additional deposition. The 

government shall file its response on or by October 3, 2014.

Plaintiff’s request that the government be ordered to produce bid documents 

relating to the construction project is DENIED on the ground that the documents, 

even if relevant to the plaintiff’s claim, would be unduly burdensome to produce and 

duplicative of other evidence (namely the costs of the contracts actually awarded).
To facilitate the second deposition of Mr. Farrell, and further consideration of 

the motion to depose Mr. Miller, the Court GRANTS plaintiff’s motion for an 

enlargement of the period in which to conduct discovery. The expert disclosure date 

shall be October 20, 2014. The close of expert discovery, including depositions, 

shall be November 20, 2014. The parties shall file a joint status report on or by 

December 4, 2014, proposing a schedule for further proceeding.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Victor J. Wolski

VICTOR J. WOLSKI

Judge

- 2 -
Case 7:07-cv-03456-KMK-MDF Document 3-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03456-KMK-MDF Document 3-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03456-KMK-MDF Document 3-2 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 3 of 3
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
                         388 Greenwich Street, 7th Floor
                          New York, New York 10013-2396

June 11, 2001



Graham Capital Management, L.P.
Stamford Harbour Park
333 Ludlow Street
Stamford, Ct. 06902

Attention:  Mr. Kenneth G.  Tropin

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewal

Dear Mr. Tropin:

We are  writing  with  respect  to  your  management  agreement  concerning  the
commodity pool to which reference is made below (the "Management Agreement"). We
are extending the term of the Management Agreement through June 30, 2002 and all
other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain unchanged.

o        Smith Barney Global Markets Futures Fund
o        Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II
o        Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
o        Salomon Smith Barney Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P.

Please  acknowledge  receipt of this  modification  by signing  one copy of this
letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel  McAuliffe at the address
above or fax to  212-723-8985.  If you have any  questions  I can be  reached at
212-723-5435.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT LLC


By:
      /s/Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         Chief Financial Officer & Director

AGREED AND ACCEPTED
GRAHAM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 3 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 4 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 5 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 6 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 7 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 8 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 9 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 10 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 11 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 12 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 13 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 14 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 15 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 16 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 17 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 18 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 19 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 20 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 21 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 22 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 23 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 24 of 25
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 12 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 25 of 25