alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 24 (Monday, February 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 6408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2274]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Siskiyou County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Siskiyou County Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Yreka, California, February 21, 2005. The meeting will include routine 
business, the review and recommendation for implementation of submitted 
project proposals, and presentations of large project concept papers.

DATES: The meeting will be held February 21, 2005, from 4 p.m. until 7 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Yreka High School Library, 
Preece Way, Yreka, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Don Hall, RAC Coordinator, Klamath 
National Forest, (530) 841-4468 or electronically at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d4b0bbbab5b8b0bcb5b8b894b2a7fab2b1b0faa1a7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="62060d0c030e060a030e0e2204114c0407064c1711">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Public 
comment opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the 
opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

    Dated: January 31, 2005.
Margaret J. Boland,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 05-2274 Filed 2-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>0000056583
<NAME>KOLLMORGEN CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,598
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,085
<ALLOWANCES>                                       502
<INVENTORY>                                     33,906
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,567
<PP&E>                                         126,428
<DEPRECIATION>                                  94,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,044
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,699
<BONDS>                                         29,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,950
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,512
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,044
<SALES>                                        167,147
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               182,367
<CGS>                                          117,929
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                52,820
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,956
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (62)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (92)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 30
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        30
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00

<FN>
(1)  EPS - Primary represents Earnings per share - Basic per SFAS 128
     EPS - Diluted represents Earnings per share - Diluted per SFAS 128
</FN>



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Human Development Training.                    

*Date:*                         December 7, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         10:30 a.m to 11:30 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Carla T. Walls, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6898,                         *wallsc@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 10, 2005.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-22940  Filed 11-18-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO





18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PrimeEnergy Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Beverly
A. Cummings, Chief Financial Officer of PrimeEnergy Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the
Corporation.











/s/ Beverly A. CummingsChief
      Financial OfficerMarch
      25,
2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7340

BILLY WHITE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SERGEANT TAYLOR,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

DEAN BROCHARD, Chief Psychologist,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-02-385)

Submitted: January 28, 2004 Decided: February 20, 2004

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy White, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Garrett Hill, Philip

Carlton Hollowell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA,

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Billy White appeals the magistrate judge’s orders denying

his motions for appointment of counsel in his suit under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2000).*

 We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

magistrate judge. See White v. Taylor, No. CA-02-385 (E.D. Va.

Sept. 22, 2002; July 24, 2003; Aug. 20, 2003). We also deny

White’s motion for appointment of counsel on appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of Kimball International,Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, James C. Thyen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 

| Date: February 5, 2010 |   |                                                    |
|------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | /s/ James C. Thyen                                      |
|                   |   | JAMES C. THYEN    President,    Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
PrimeEnergy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles E. Drimal Jr., Chief Executive
Officer of PrimeEnergy Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Charles E. Drimal, Jr.                    
|Charles E. Drimal, Jr. Chief
Executive Officer
|November 15, 2010
#### STATE v. BRAY

No. 180 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 43.

Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 29 August 1978.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed December 17, 2014.

________________

No. 3D12-2808

Lower Tribunal No. 09-84934

________________

Warren Lally,

Appellant,

vs.

City of Homestead, et. al.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, David C. Miller,

Judge.

Schuler, Halvorson, Weisser & Zoeller, P.A., Jason D. Weisser and David

M. Kerner (West Palm Beach); Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., Andrew A. Harris

and Bard D. Rockenbach (West Palm Beach), for appellant.

Weiss Serota Helfman Cole Bierman & Popok, P.L., Edward G. Guedes,

Laura K. Wendell, Kelly Rains Jesson, Michael Popok and Samuel I. Zeskind, for

appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
Based upon appellee’s confession of error, and in light of Masone v. City of

Aventura, 147 So. 3d 492 (Fla. 2014), we reverse the final judgment and remand to

the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

2
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. HARRY H. GOODMAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.

Submitted May 13, 1932

Decided October 19, 1932.

Before Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justices Bodine and Donges.

For the plaintiff in error, *Thomas B. Hall.*

For the defendant in error, *Sylvester C. Smith, Jr.,*prosecutor of the pleas.

Per Cueiam.

Plaintiff in error was convicted of embezzlement. It was alleged in the indictment that the defendant, being the servant and agent of three certain individuals, did feloniously and unlawfully embezzle and convert to his own use certain bonds and securities of the par value of $15,000 and $4,000 in money, which were committed to the defendant for the purpose of applying them to the purchase of Sherman’s Theatre in Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, with intent .to defraud, and did willfully retain and appropriate said securities and money to his own use.

Plaintiff in error urges, as a ground for reversal, the trial court’s refusal to direct a verdict of acquittal.

It was in evidence, both by written and parol evidence, that the securities and money were advanced to plaintiff in error upon the express agreement that the proceeds were to be used for the purchase of a theatre and not otherwise, and the testimony was susceptible of the interpretation that the Crouses, *1148whose money and securities were advanced, were to have an interest in the property purchased. Plaintiff in error asserts that the securities and money were advanced purely as a loan. He so testified and produced a receipt, signed by two of the three Crouses, on return of some of the securities, in which the word “loan” is used.

The Crouses testified to the arrangement as an advance for a specified purpose, as stated in the receipt of June 15th, 1931 *(Exhibit D-l),*and not as a loan, as stated in the receipt of August 11th, 1931 *(Exhibit D-&).*If, as they testified, the property was not turned over to Goodman as a loan, but as an advance of their share in a common enterprise, then clearly Goodman did not so use it but converted it to his own use and devoted it to his own purposes.

We are of opinion that there was raised upon the proofs a question of fact, which the court properly left to the jury.

This appears to be the only question argued in the brief of plaintiff in error and disposes of the question of the propriety of -submitting the case to the jury.

We have, however, examined the other questions raised in the bill of exceptions and assignments of errors, and conclude that there does not appear to be any harmful error in the rulings of the court.

The judgment under review is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ERIC D. RUTLEDGE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 59 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of July, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Caminus Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, William P. Lyons,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


          /s/ WILLIAM P. LYONS                                    April 7, 2003
     --------------------------------------
              William P. Lyons
               President and
          Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors

ARTISTdirect, Inc.

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the registration statements (No. 333-122027, No. 333-53208,No. 333-38104, No. 333-63572 and No. 333-68396) on Forms S-8 of ARTISTdirect, Inc., of our reportdated March 30, 2006, except for Note 9 as to which the date is April 7,2006 and Note 23 as to which the date is April 27, 2006, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of ARTISTdirect, Inc. and subsidiaries (the“Company”) as of December 31, 2004 and 2005, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity(deficiency) and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears inthe Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005of ARTISTdirect, Inc.

 
| /s/ GUMBINER SAVETT INC. |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
|                     |
| Santa Monica, California |
| April 27, 2006      |

 

----
FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-17-0000696

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

MJ, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CR, Defendant-Appellant

and

CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY,

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Defendant

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(FC-P NO. 16-1-6470)

ORDER OF CORRECTION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Opinion of the court,

filed on June 30, 2021, is hereby corrected as follows: 

At page 8, line 7 from the bottom, "Court" should be

"Family Court" so the line reads as follows: 

jurisdiction because the Family Court

made no specific finding that

At page 11, line 2 from the bottom, remove extraneous

quotation mark at the end of the sentence and replace with "[]"

so the line reads as follows:

the exercise of personal jurisdiction.[]

At page 14, line 7 within the block quote, add an open

parenthesis before the number 2 so the line reads as follows: 

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000696

06-AUG-2021

09:12 AM

Dkt. 99 OCOR
FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(2) the claim must be one which arises out of or

relates to

At page 16, line 8 from the top, replace "283-84" with

"284" so the line reads as follows: 

with the forum State." Id. at 284

(quoting Burger King Corp.

At page 17, line 17 from the bottom, "Court" should be

with a lower case "c" so the line reads as follows: 

grounds. The court in Miller held that

jurisdiction over the 

At page 18, line 6 from the bottom, replace "493" with

"494" so the line reads as follows: 

of the issue until as late as trial." 

Id. at 494. Rather, the 

At page 20, line 16 from the top, delete extraneous

underline from "Johnston" so the line reads as follows: 

Brewington, 836 F.3d 543, 548 (6th Cir.

2016); Johnston v.

At page 20, line 11 from the bottom, insert a comma

after "Shaw" so the line reads as follows: 

Shaw, 76 Hawai#i at 327, 876 P.2d at

1295 (emphasis added)

At page 24, line 6 from the bottom, replace "Id." with

"495 U.S." so the line reads as follows: 

justice.'" 495 U.S. at 619. In

Burnham, the U.S. Supreme Court held

At page 25, line 17 from the bottom, replace "Id." with

"495 U.S." so the line reads as follows: 

party or witness in unrelated judicial

proceedings. 495 U.S. at 613.

2
FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

At page 26, line 16 from the bottom, replace "Id." with

"641 F.Supp.2d" so the line reads as follows: 

641 F.Supp.2d at 481, 486. Glynn

rejected the plaintiff's theory of 

At page 26, line 5 from the bottom, delete the comma

after "also" so the line reads as follows: 

487-88; see also Stewart, 2015 WL 326424

at *6 (explaining that

At page 27, footnote 14, first line, replace "is" with

"has since been amended to" so the line reads as follows:

14 Hart cites to HRS § 576B-301(c), but the

pertinent provision has since been amended to

HRS

The clerk of the court is directed to take all

necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of these

changes. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 6, 2021. 

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

3
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Iteris, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James S. Miele, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date: June 29, 2006 |   |                    |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                     |   | /s/ JAMES S. MIELE      |
|                     |   | James S. Miele,         |
|                     |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or anyother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Case 1:07-cv-03347-DC Document 30 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. McCASKILL

No. 355 PC

Case below: 47 NC App 289

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 September 1980.
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Whitney Information Network, Inc. (the "Company") for
the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I, Anne M. Donoho, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ ANNE M. DONOHO Anne M. Donoho Chief Financial OfficerMarch 31, 2009


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks