alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-8 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-8 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-8 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-8 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-8 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-8 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-8 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-8 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-8 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-8 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-8 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-8 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-8 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-8 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-8 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-8 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-8 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-8 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-8 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-8 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 20 of 20
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 45-2 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 45-2 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Earle M. Jorgensen Company (“EMJ”) for theperiod ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Maurice S. Nelson, Jr., as ChiefExecutive Officer of EMJ, and I, William S. Johnson, as Chief Financial Officerof EMJ, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          ThisReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of EMJ as of and for the periodscovered in this report.

 

Date:  August 13, 2004

 

 
| /s/ Maurice  S. Nelson, Jr.                                     |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Maurice S. Nelson, Jr.                                          |
| President,  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer |

 

 
| /s/ William  S. Johnson                                |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| William S. Johnson                                     |
| Vice  President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or another document authenticating,acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to Earle M. Jorgensen Company and will be retained byEarle M. Jorgensen Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its Staff upon request. The foregoing certification isaccompanying the Form 10-Q solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of title 18United States Code and is not being filed as a part of the Form 10-Q or as aseparate disclosure document.

 

----
#### STATE v. RICHARDSON

No. 92 PC.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 33.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 November 1974'. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 8 November 1974.
Case 1:07-cv-03436-LTS Document 14 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03436-LTS Document 14 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03436-LTS Document 14 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03436-LTS Document 14 Filed 01/07/2008 Page 4 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 17 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 17 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
      THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Epoch Holding Corporation (the "Company")
      on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), William
      W.
      Priest, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Adam Borak, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and
      for,
      the periods presented in the Report.








Dated:
      September 28, 2006


By:
      /s/
      William W. Priest




_______________________


William
      W. Priest


Chief
      Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)














Dated:
      September 28, 2006


By:
      /s/
      Adam Borak




_______________________


Adam
      Borak


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
HC 26

Controlling Formaldehyde Exposures During Embalming

Embalmers are exposed to formaldehyde at concentrations averaging up to 9 parts per million

(ppm) during embalming. Short-term exposures to this strong-smelling gas cause eye, nose,

and throat irritation at levels up to 5 ppm. At levels from 10 to 20 ppm, it causes cough, chest

tightness, and unusual heart beat; and from 50 to 100 ppm, fluid on the lungs, followed by

death. Exposure to formaldehyde over a long time may also cause cancer. 

NIOSH engineers designed and evaluated a local exhaust ventilation [LEV] system that

effectively reduces embalmer’s exposure to formaldehyde below the OSHA permissible limit of

0.75 ppm, as an 8-hr time-weighted average exposure. 

LOCAL EXHAUST VENTILATION

The LEV system consists of a pair of 6-ft-long slot hoods placed on each side of the

embalming table. These slot hoods capture formaldehyde by means of an exhaust fan

placed outside the embalming room. The exhaust fan maintains an optimum airflow of 700

cubic feet per minute. For a slot width of 1 inch, the slot velocity is 720 feet per minute.

Embalming equipment manufacturers and distributors can provide LEV systems for

existing tables, or a sheet metal contractor can custom build the LEV system [see Figure

1.].

General room (dilution) ventilation is another way to exhaust formaldehyde from the

embalming room. Depending on how well the air in a room is mixed, 4 to 13 times more 

exhaust air is needed to achieve the same control as from the LEV system. Make-up air

costs for heating or cooling are considerably less for the LEV system than for dilution

ventilation. Therefore, NIOSH recommends that the primary control be the LEV system.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Public Health Service

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
For More Information

Figure 1. Diagram of Local Exhaust Ventilation Slot Hood

— call NIOSH* at 1-800-35-NIOSH (1-800-356-4674), or

— visit the NIOSH Home Page on the World Wide Web at

http://www.cdc.gov/niosh

Acknowledgments

This document is in the public domain and may be freely copied or reprinted. NIOSH encourages all readers of this

HAZARD CONTROLS to make it available to all interested employers and workers.

To obtain more free information about controlling this hazard or for information about other

occupational health and safety issues:

A technical report on this subject has been published: Effective Local Exhaust Ventilation for

Controlling Formaldehyde Exposures During Embalming [Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 7(12):840-

845]. 

*NIOSH is the Federal agency responsible for conducting research and making recommendations for preventing work-related

illnesses and injuries. All HAZARD CONTROLS are based on research studies that show how worker exposures to hazardous

agents or activities can be significantly reduced.

The principal contributors to this publication are Michael G. Gressel, Anne Votaw, Rosmarie T.

Hagedorn, and Jerome P. Flesch. Drawing by Dick Carlson.

October 1998 DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 98-149
#### IN RE HOGAN

No. 154 PC.

Case below: 24 N.C. App. 51.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 February 1975.
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-3 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 16 of 16
CONSENT
OF EXPERT








Reference
is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Platinum Group Metals
Ltd. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2008 to be filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United
States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information
Form (the “AIF”) and Management’s Discussion and Analysis(“MD&A”) of the
Company for the year then ended, which are incorporated by reference
therein.





Each of
the undersigned hereby consents to the references to, and the information
derived from, the reports titled “Technical Report (Feasibility Study) Project 1
(Elandsfontein and Frischgewaagd)” dated July 7, 2008, “Competent Persons Report
on Project 3 of the Western Bushveld Joint Venture (WBJV) Located on the Western
Limb of the Bushveld Igneous Complex, South Africa” dated June 9, 2008 and
“Competent Persons Report on Project Area 1 and 1A of the Western Bushveld Joint
Venture (WBJV) Located on the Western Limb of  the Bushveld Igneous
Complex, South Africa” dated September 7, 2007 and to the references, as
applicable, to the undersigned’s name in the 40-F, the AIF and the
MD&A.








Minxcon
      (Pty) Ltd
              By:
      C J
      Muller
              Title:
      Director
              
              Date:
      November 30, 2008
            //signed//
              Charles
      J. Muller
              BSc
      (Hons), Pr.Sc.Nat.
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 22 Filed 12/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 22 Filed 12/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### LITTLE v. FOOD SERVICE

No. 42 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 742.

Petition by plaintiff for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 1 November 1977.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of ISA Internationale Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1.) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operation of the Company.  By: /s/ Bernard L. Brodkorb  Bernard L. Brodkorb President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chairman of the Board  Dated: January 14, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1604 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1604

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize certain 
    programs relating to nonpoint source management, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2019

  Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Rubio) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize certain 
    programs relating to nonpoint source management, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Local Water Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. NONPOINT SOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS.

    Section 319 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 
1329) is amended by striking subsection (j) and inserting the 
following:
    ``(j) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            ``(1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
        to carry out subsections (h) and (i) $200,000,000 for each of 
        fiscal years 2020 through 2024, of which not more than 
        $7,500,000 for each fiscal year may be used to carry out 
        subsection (i).
            ``(2) Availability.--Amounts made available under paragraph 
        (1) shall remain available until expended.''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 21


Subsidiaries of the Registrant


|       |           |  |            |                        |           |  |                        |                 |  |  |           | 
|------ | --------- |  | ---------- | ---------------------- | --------- |  | ---------------------- | --------------- |  |  | --------- | 
|       |           |  |            | Percentage of          |           |  | State of Incorporation |                
|Parent |           |  | Subsidiary |                        | Ownership |  |                        | or Organization | 
|       |           |  |            |                        |           |  |                        |                 | 
|       | HEI, Inc. |  |            | Cross Technology, Inc. |           |  | 100%                   |                 |  |  | Minnesota |
Case 1:07-cv-03210-PKC Document 4 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03210-PKC Document 4 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03210-PKC Document 4 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### STATE v. JOE HUGHES.

(Filed 20 January, 1967.)

Appeal by defendant from *Bickett, J.,*at February 1966 Criminal Session of Alamance.

The defendant was convicted of assaults with a deadly weapon, a knife, on his son-in-law, Elwyn Lee King, and the latter’s father, Walter L. King. Upon sentences of 18 months pronounced in both cases, to be served concurrently, he appealed.

The State’s evidence tended to show that Elwyn Lee King had been separated from his wife Mary Jo, the daughter of the defendant, Joe Hughes, for some time. On 3 December, 1965, the Kings went from their home in Kure Beach to Burlington to pay Elwyn’s wife for the support of their baby. At a parking lot where the wife worked they had trouble with her father. In the ensuing fight both the Kings were cut by Hughes, and these prosecutions resulted.

*Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General, Harrison Lewis, Deputy Attorney General, Donald M. Jacobs, Staff Attorney for the State.*

*Boss, Wood & Dodge for defendant appellant.*

PER Cuexam.

The defendant asserts no error except that the Judge’s charge is not sufficient with regard to defendant's right of self-defense, both real and apparent.

An examination of the charge shows that it is carefully and completely worded in excellent form and is in almost identical words with those approved in *S. v. Anderson,*230 N.C. 54 (56), 51 S.E. 2d 895, and *S. v. Fletcher,*268 N.C. 140, 150 S.E. 2d 54.

Whatever the shortcomings or derelictions of his son-in-law the defendant should let the courts adjudicate them. When he attempted to usurp their functions with his knife he was clearly in the wrong.

No error.
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 31-2 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 31-2 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

APR 8 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD VAUGHN KELLER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM ALBRIGHT,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 97-4205

(Dist. of Utah)

(D.C. No. 94-CV-579-S)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BALDOCK, EBEL, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The court therefore

honors the parties’ requests and orders the cause submitted without oral argument.
-2-

This court has conducted a de novo review of the parties’ appellate briefs

and contentions, the district court’s Memorandum Decision, and the entire record

on appeal. Based upon that de novo review, we affirm for substantially those

reasons set out in the district court’s thorough Memorandum Decision dated

November 17, 1997.

The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Utah is

hereby AFFIRMED .

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Michael R. Murphy

Circuit Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,908
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 9,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     36,206
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,846
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,851
<LOANS>                                         73,980
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,136
<DEPOSITS>                                      95,688
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,744
<LONG-TERM>                                     18,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        111
<COMMON>                                           317
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 140,136
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,387
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,395
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,782
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,778
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 633
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,371
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  (1,627)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,907
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,982
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,982
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,042
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     4.7
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,200
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                        52
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,625
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,625
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>