alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      21.1**

**Significant      Subsidiaries of the Registrant**

|   |                                           |   |                       |   | **State                of** |     |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|----------|
|   | **Company**                                    |   | **%                Owned** |   | **Incorporation**           |     |
|   |                                           |   |                       |   |                        |     |   |
| 1)     | Epoch                Investment Partners, Inc. |   | 100.0%                     |   |                        | Delaware | Active |
|   |                                           |   |                       |   |                        |     |   |
| 2)     | J                Net Holdings, LLC             |   | 100.0%                     |   |                        | Nevada   | Inactive |
|   |                                           |   |                       |   |                        |     |   |
| 3)     | IW                Holdings, Inc.               |   | 100.0%                     |   |                        | Delaware | Inactive |
|   |                                           |   |                       |   |                        |     |   |
| 4)     | J                Net Ventures I, LLC           |   | 100.0%                     |   |                        | Delaware | Inactive |
|   |                                           |   |                       |   |                        |     |   |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

------------------------------------------------------------x 

DEVAL DENIZCILIK VE TICARET A.S., 

 Plaintiff, 07 CIV 3397 (JGK) 

 

-against- ECF CASE 

 

REPINTER INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING 

CO. S.A. and MIACHART CORPORATION 

LLC., 

 Defendants. 

-----------------------------------------------------------x 

DEFENDANTS’ REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER 

SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR VACATUR OF RULE B ATTACHMENT

KEANE & MARLOWE, LLP 

Attorneys for Defendants 

REPINTER INTERNATIONAL 

SHIPPING CO. S.A. and 

MIACHART CORPORATION LLC 

197 Route 18 South Suite 3000 

East Brunswick, New Jersey 08816 

(732) 951-8300 

Of Counsel: 

Mary Ann C. Marlowe (MM-0723) 

Christopher P. Keane (CPK-4394) 

Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 17 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 2 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### SHARPE v. PUGH

No. 70 PC.

Case below: 21 N.C. App. 110.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 4 June 1974.
Case 1:06-cv-15157-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Argued and submitted May 13, 1998,

affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for reconsideration March 24, 1999

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Consuelo Trujillo, Claimant. Consuelo TRUJILLO, *Petitioner, v.*PACIFIC SAFETY SUPPLY and SAIF Corporation, *Respondents.*

(WCB 96-10056; CA A99410)

978 P2d 1037

Max Rae argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

David Runner argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

*351Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Wollheim, Judges.

WOLLHEIM, J.

*352WOLLHEEM, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that awarded him 21 percent unscheduled permanent disability. Claimant makes two assignments of error. First, he argues that the procedure set forth in ORS 656.283(7) violates his right to due process under the Fourteen Amendment to the United States Constitution by not allowing him to testify at the hearing. This argument was addressed and rejected in *Koskela v. Willamette Industries,*159 Or App 229, 978 P2d 1018 (1999). Second, he argues that the Board’s findings regarding his base functional capacity are not consistent. We affirm on the first assignment of error, and reverse and remand on the second.

Claimant injured his neck, shoulders and chest pulling a piece of plywood. Claimant’s physician diagnosed cervical, thoracic, right scapula and right trapezius strains. After claimant became medically stationary, SAIF issued a notice of closure, awarding claimant 16 percent unscheduled disability. The worksheet attached to the notice indicated that claimant’s base functional capacity (BFC) was light and that his residual functional capacity (RFC) was also light.1 Claimant requested reconsideration and the reconsideration order affirmed the closure order.

The Board made inconsistent statements regarding claimant’s BFC. The Board stated that claimant’s BFC was both medium and light.2 Both statements cannot be correct. SAIF concedes error but argues that the error is harmless. We do not agree. If claimant’s BFC is medium, he would be entitled to additional permanent disability. If claimant’s BFC *353is light, claimant would not be entitled to additional permanent disability. Accordingly, remand to the Board is necessary to determine claimant’s correct BFC.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for reconsideration.

1

 OAR 436-035-0310(3)(a) defines BFC as “an individual’s demonstrated physical capacity before the injury or disease.” OAR 436-035-0310(3)(b) defines RFC as “an individual’s remaining ability to perform work-related activities despite medically determinable impairment resulting from the accepted compensable condition.”

2

 OAR 436-035-0310(3)(h) provides that medium level work “means the worker can occasionally lift 50 pounds and can lift or carry objects weighing up to 25 pounds frequently.” OAR 436-035-0310(3X1) provides that light level work “means the worker has the ability to occasionally lift 20 pounds and can frequently lift or carry objects weighing up to 10 pounds.”
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 6712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2335]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, International Collaborations in 
Infectious Disease Research.
    Date: March 8-10, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Georgetown Holiday Inn, 2101 Wisconsin Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20007.
    Contact Person: Gary S. Madonna, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge 
Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-3528, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#76111b47440136181f1e58111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2b4c461a195c6b454243054c445d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 1, 2005.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-2335 Filed 2-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 22 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### MITCHELL v. K.W.D.S., INC.

No. 15 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 409.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 25 August 1975.
Case 1:07-cv-03402-LAP-RLE     Document 6      Filed 05/14/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03402-LAP-RLE     Document 6      Filed 05/14/2007     Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
 
                                 Exhibit 10.8B

                                AMENDMENT NO. 1

     WHEREAS, Barrett Resources Corporation (the "Corporation") and William J.
Barrett have executed a Severance Protection Agreement dated February 6, 1998
(the "Agreement");

     WHEREAS, at that time of the execution of the Agreement it was assumed that
Mr. Barrett would retire on January 31, 1999;

     WHEREAS, at the request of the Board of Directors, Mr. Barrett has agreed
to remain as an employee of the Corporation through March 31, 2000; and

     WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing the parties desire to extend the term of
the Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Corporation and Mr. Barrett agree as follows:

     1.  Paragraph 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting January 31,
1999" and substituting "March 31, 2000".

     2.  This amendment shall be effective November 19, 1998.


ATTEST:                                 BARRETT RESOURCES CORPORATION



/s/ Eugene A. Lang, Jr.                 BY:  /s/ A. Ralph Reed
Secretary                                    A. Ralph Reed
                                             President and Chief 
                                             Operating Officer



                                        WILLIAM J. BARRETT
        

 
                                             /s/ William J. Barrett
Exhibit 21.1
  Name
    
    State of OrganizationCreditComm Services LLC
    
    DelawareIntersections Health Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareIntersections Insurance Services, Inc.
    
    IllinoisIntersections Business Services, LLC
    
    DelawareScreening International Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareScreening International, LLC
    
    DelawareAmerican Background Information Services, Inc.
    
    VirginiaControl Risks Screening, Ltd.
    
    United KingdomControl Risks Screening (S) Pte Ltd.
    
    SingaporeCaptira Analytical, LLC
    
    DelawareNet Enforcers, Inc.
    
    Florida
#### STATE v. FLYNT

No. 98 PC.

Case below: 8 N.C. App. 328.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 14 July 1970.
#### CONCRETE CO. v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

No. 93.

Reported: 299 N.C. 620.

Petition by plaintiff to rehear denied 15 July 1980.
Case 1:07-cv-03424-PKC Document 2 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. CLEMMONS

No. 144 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 101.

Application by defendant for further review denied 4 January 1979.
CC Filed by Filing Services Canada Inc. 403-717-3898


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT




This Amendment No. 1 to Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (“Amendment”) is entered into as of this 14th day of September 2006 by and between Micron Enviro Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and Stephen J. Amdahl.




RECITALS:




WHEREAS, the parties entered into the Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of February 22, 2006 (“Option Agreement”). Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Option Agreement; and




WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Option Agreement as set forth herein.




AGREEMENT:




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:




1.  In exchange for Grantee’s promise of continued service in his capacity as a director of the Corporation, Section 1 of the Option Agreement shall be amended to decrease the Option purchase price to $0.0151 per share.




2.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same document.




3. Except as so expressly amended, the Option Agreement is ratified and confirmed by the parties and, as hereby amended, shall be deemed and construed as a single instrument in full force and effect; provided, however, in the case of any conflict or inconsistency between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the prior Option Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 to Option Agreement as of the date set forth above.




Micron Enviro Systems, Inc.

Micron Enviro Systems, Inc.

   Stephen J. Amdahl







By:

/s/ Bradley Rudman

/s/ Stephen J. Amdahl

Name: 

/s/ Bradley Rudman

Title: 

President, Director, CFO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0071 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JUSTIN QUINLAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until October 14 , 2020 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 3 2020

09/03/2020
Case Number: DA 19-0071
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Gregory S. Furness, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Delphax Technologies
Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |     |  |                                                    
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Dated: December 29, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Gregory S. Furness                             
|                         |  |     |  | Gregory S. Furness                                 
|                         |  |     |  | Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
CC Filed by Filing Services Canada Inc. 403-717-3898


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT




This Amendment No. 1 to Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (“Amendment”) is entered into as of this 31st day of October 2008 by and between Micron Enviro Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and Stephen J. Amdahl under the 2006C Stock Nonqualified Stock Option Plan.

 

RECITALS:




WHEREAS, the parties entered into the Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of November 2, 2007 (“Option Agreement”).  Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Option Agreement; and




WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Option Agreement as set forth herein.




AGREEMENT:




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:




1.  In exchange for Grantee’s promise of continued service in his capacity as a consultant of the Corporation, Section 4 of the Option Agreement shall be amended to extend the Option expiry period to November 1, 2009.




2.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same document.




3. Except as so expressly amended, the Option Agreement is ratified and confirmed by the parties and, as hereby amended, shall be deemed and construed as a single instrument in full force and effect; provided, however, in the case of any conflict or inconsistency between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the prior Option Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 to Option Agreement as of the date set forth above.







Micron Enviro Systems, Inc.

  Stephen J. Amdahl







By:

/s/ Bradley Rudman

/s/ Stephen J. Amdahl

Name: 

/s/ Bradley Rudman

Title: 

President, Director, CFO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         876,533
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               917,134
<PP&E>                                      15,138,936
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,270,812
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,120,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          220,000
<BONDS>                                      4,170,474
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,781,624
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,120,097
<SALES>                                      2,293,836
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,689,001
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  325,891
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               108,840
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             308,878
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,945,392
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,945,392
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,945,392
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    84.77<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    84.77<F1>
<FN>
<F1>
EPS IS PER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 Chartered
Accountants
 PricewaterhouseCoopers
Place
 250 Howe
Street, Suite 700
 Vancouver,
British Columbia
 Canada
V6C 3S7
 Telephone
+1 604 806 7000
 Facsimile
+1 604 806 7806





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of
Platinum Group Metals Ltd. of our report dated November 21, 2008 relating to the
consolidated financial statements for the years ended August 31, 2008 and 2007
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of August
31, 2008 which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders.




Signed
“PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP”





Chartered
Accountants


Vancouver,
British Columbia


November
21, 2008
#### WILLIAMS v. GREENE

No. 135 PC.

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 80.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 14 July 1978. Motion of defendants to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 14 July 1978.
#### STATE v. ABERNATHY

No. 193 PC.

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 527.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 29 August 1978. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 29 August 1978.
#### FLORENCE KINSEY, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 10955

September 15, 1978

584 P.2d 158

*Jeffrey D. Sobel,*Las Vegas, for Appellant.

*Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *George E. Holt,*District Attorney, and *Geraldine Zucker,*Deputy, Clark County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

This is an appeal from an order denying a pretrial habeas *597corpus challenge to a justice court’s order denying Florence Kinsey’s motion for the production of certain records.

There is no provision in the habeas corpus statutes (NRS 34.360-NRS 34.680) which permits a pretrial challenge to an order denying a motion for discovery. Neither is there a provision for interlocutory appellate review of such orders.1 Therefore, the habeas petition was not cognizable in the district court. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order and remand this case with instructions to dismiss the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. *Cf.*Sheriff v. Toston, 93 Nev. 394, 566 P.2d 411 (1977).

1

*Cf.*Franklin v. District Court, 85 Nev. 401, 455 P.2d 919 (1969), where this court ruled that appellate review of such orders is postponed until entry of a final judgment of conviction.
Case 1:06-cv-15053-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 7:07-cv-03335-CLB Document 4 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03335-CLB Document 4 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. BRADY

No. 116 PC.

Case below: 16 N.C. App. 555.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 18 January 1973. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal allowed 18 January 1973.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 168 

To retitle Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore as Indiana Dunes National 

Park, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 16, 2019 

Mr. YOUNG (for himself and Mr. BRAUN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To retitle Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore as Indiana 

Dunes National Park, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Indiana Dunes Na5 tional Park Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE RETITLED 

7 AS INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL PARK. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Public Law 89–761 (16 U.S.C. 

9 460u et seq.) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 168 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘National Lakeshore’’ and ‘‘na2 tional lakeshore’’ each place it appears and inserting 

3 ‘‘National Park’’; and 

4 (2) by striking ‘‘lakeshore’’ each place it ap5 pears and inserting ‘‘Park’’. 

6 (b) NONAPPLICATION.—The amendment made by 

7 subsection (a)(1) shall not apply to the title of the map 

8 referred to in the first section of Public Law 89–761 (16 

9 U.S.C. 460u), or to the title of the maps referred to in 

10 section 4 of Public Law 89–761 (16 U.S.C. 460u–3). 

11 SEC. 3. PAUL H. DOUGLAS TRAIL. 

12 The 1.6 mile trail within the Indiana Dunes National 

13 Park designated the ‘‘Miller-Woods Trail’’ is hereby redes14 ignated as the ‘‘Paul H. Douglas Trail’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Case 1:07-cr-00366-JSR Document 13 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 1 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00366-JSR Document 13 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 2 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00366-JSR Document 13 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 3 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00366-JSR Document 13 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 4 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00366-JSR Document 13 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 5 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00366-JSR Document 13 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 6 of 6