alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 172 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 172

    To delay the reimposition of the annual fee on health insurance 
                      providers until after 2021.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 16, 2019

 Mr. Gardner (for himself, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Jones, Mr. 
Scott of South Carolina, and Ms. Sinema) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To delay the reimposition of the annual fee on health insurance 
                      providers until after 2021.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Health Insurance Tax Relief Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. DELAY OF REIMPOSITION OF ANNUAL FEE ON HEALTH INSURANCE 
              PROVIDERS UNTIL AFTER 2020.

    (a) In General.--Section 9010(j)(3) of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act is amended by striking ``December 31, 2019'' and 
inserting ``December 31, 2021''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to calendar years beginning after December 31, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:06-cv-15071-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15056-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15056-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15056-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15056-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15056-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15056-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15056-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15056-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15056-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15056-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15056-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15056-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15056-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Voice Control Systems, Inc.
Dallas, Texas

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-65842), pertaining to the Voice Control Systems,
Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan (formerly Scott Instruments Corporation 1992 Stock
Option Plan), of our report dated January 28, 1999, relating to the financial
statements of Voice Control Systems, Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                                  /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 30, 1999
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 3.3C
                                                                    ------------


                          AMENDMENTS TO THE BYLAWS OF
                         BARRETT RESOURCES CORPORATION
                             DATED MARCH 22, 2001



     At a meeting of the Board Of Directors of the Registrant (the "Board") held
on March 22, 2001, the following resolution was adopted by the Board:

          "RESOLVED, that Section 4(a) of Article II of the Bylaws of the
     Corporation shall be amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

          (a)  Meetings.  In order that the corporation may determine the
          stockholders entitled to notice of or to vote at any meeting of
          stockholders or any adjournment thereof, or entitled to receive
          payment of any dividend or other distribution or allotment of any
          rights, or entitled to exercise any rights in respect of any change,
          conversion or exchange of stock or for the purpose of any other lawful
          action, the board of directors may fix a record date, which record
          date shall not precede the date upon which the resolution fixing the
          record date is adopted by the board of directors, and which record
          date:  (1) in the case of determination of stockholders entitled to
          vote at any meeting of stockholders or adjournment thereof, shall,
          unless otherwise required by law, not be more than sixty (60) nor less
          than ten (10) days before the date of such meeting; and (2)  in the
          case of any other action, shall not be more than sixty (60) days prior
          to such other action.  If no record date is fixed:  (1) the record
          date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of or to vote at
          a meeting of stockholders shall be at the close of business on the day
          next preceding the day on which notice is given, or, if notice is
          waived, at the close of business on the day next preceding the day on
          which the meeting is held; and (2)  the record date for determining
          stockholders for any other purpose shall be at the close of business
          on the day on which the board of directors adopts the resolution
          relating thereto.  A determination of stockholders of record entitled
          to notice of or to vote at a meeting of stockholders shall apply to
          any adjournment of the meeting; provided, however, that the board of
          directors may fix a new record date for the adjourned meeting."
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1638 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to increase the maximum limit 

on the number of special masters allowed in the United States Court 

of Federal Claims, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23 (legislative day, MAY 22), 2019 

Mr. CASEY (for himself and Mr. ISAKSON) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to increase the 

maximum limit on the number of special masters allowed 

in the United States Court of Federal Claims, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Vaccine In5 jury Compensation Program Improvement Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1638 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM LIMIT ON NUMBER OF SPE2 CIAL MASTERS ALLOWED IN UNITED STATES 

3 COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS. 

4 Section 2112(c)(1) of the Public Health Service Act 

5 (42 U.S.C. 300aa–12(c)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘not 

6 more than 8 special masters’’ and inserting ‘‘not more 

7 than 16 special masters’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-7 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 1 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-7 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 2 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-7 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 3 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-7 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 4 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-7 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 5 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-7 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 6 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-7 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 7 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-7 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 8 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-7 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 9 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-7 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 10 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-7 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 11 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-7 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 12 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-7 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 13 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-7 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 14 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-7 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 15 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-7 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 16 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-7 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 17 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-7 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 18 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 1-7 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 19 of 19
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-4378

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CARLA GWENNETT GRAHAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(CR-02-599)

Submitted: October 23, 2003 Decided: October 29, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jessica Salvini, SALVINI & BENNETT, L.L.C., Greenville, South

Carolina, for Appellant. Elizabeth Jean Howard, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Carla G. Graham appeals from the seventy-month sentence

imposed after she pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent

to distribute and to distribute more than five grams of crack

cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000). Her counsel has

filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), raising two issues, but stating that, in her view, there

are no meritorious issues for appeal. Graham was informed of her

right to file a pro se supplemental brief but has not done so. We

affirm.

Counsel raises as potential issues the district court’s

assessment of a two-level enhancement under U.S. Sentencing

Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1(b)(1) (2001), based upon Graham’s

possession of a firearm and the court’s refusal to adjust Graham’s

offense level under USSG § 3B1.2 based upon her role in the

offense. Our review of the record leads us to conclude that the

district court did not clearly err in either regard. See United

States v. Sayles, 296 F.3d 219, 224 (4th Cir. 2002) (providing

standard of review for role in offense adjustment); United States

v. McAllister, 272 F.3d 228, 234 (4th Cir. 2001) (providing

standard of review for possession of a weapon). 

As required by Anders, we have examined the entire record and

find no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm

Graham’s conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel
3

inform her client, in writing, of her right to petition the Supreme

Court of the United States for further review. If the client

requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such

a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court

for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must

state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Opinion issued O ctober 26, 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 22 - 00820 - CV

——————————— DAWNELL WIL LIAMS , Appella nt

V. K. D. UPA DHYAYA , Appell e e On Appeal from County Court at Law No . 1

Fort Bend County, Texa s Trial Court Ca se No. 22 - CCV - 070379

MEMORANDU M OPINION T h e parties , repre senting that they have reached a settlement agreement resolving the i r underl ying dispute, h a ve fi led a n agre ed motion to dismiss the app e a l
. The parties have agreed that they will bear their own appellate costs. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(d)
. Counsel for both parties have signed the motion
. No cross2

appeal has been filed , an d no opinion has issued
. See T EX . R
. A PP . P. 42. 1 ( c )
. Accor d ingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal
. See T EX . R. A PP . P
. 42 .1( a)(1), 43.2(f

)
. We direct the Clerk for this Court that costs are to be taxed against the part ies who incurred the sam e. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1 (d). We d ismiss any p en d i ng motions as moot. P ER CURIA M Panel consists of Ju stice s K elly, Hightower, and Gue rra.
#### STATE v. GRADY

No. 117 PC.

Case below: 38 N.C. App. 152.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 28 November 1978. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 28 November 1978.
# USS Oklahoma Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Casinger, E.)

/ Published Aug. 17, 2022
WASHINGTON,
#### SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. ADM MILLING CO.

No. 571P82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 667.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 December 1982.
#### O’GRADY v. BANK

No. 82 PC.

No. 25 (Fall Term).

Case below: 35 N.C. App. 315.

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 8 May 1978.
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 17 Filed 06/03/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 17 Filed 06/03/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### GOLDING v. TAYLOR

No. 33 PC.

Case below: 19 N.C. App. 245.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 October 1973.
Case 1:07-cv-03354-SAS Document 4 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
# C_2007294EN.01000501.xml

| 6.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4803 — RBS/Sempra)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 294/02)

On 30 November 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4803. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4803. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
#### STATE v. HADDOCK

No. 106 PC.

Case below: 19 N.C. App. 714.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 9 January 1974. . -
---

CONSENT OF EXPERT

The undersigned hereby consents to the references to, and the
information derived from, the report titled An Independent Technical Report on
the Maseve Project (WBJV Project areas 1 and 1A) located on the Western Limb of
the Bushveld Igneous Complex, South Africa, dated effective July 15, 2015, the
report titled Independent Technical Report on the Waterberg Project Including
Mineral Resource Update and Pre-Feasibility Study, dated effective October 17,
2016 and to the references, as applicable, to the undersigneds name included in
or incorporated by reference in the Form 40-F being filed by Platinum Group
Metals Ltd. (the Company) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for
the fiscal year ended August 31, 2016, the Annual Information Form and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of the Company for the year then ended,
which are incorporated by reference therein, and the Companys registration
statement on Form F-10 (No. 333-213985).

/s/ Gordon I. CunninghamGordon I.
Cunningham Date: November 29, 2016

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6340
ROY LEE PERRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE F. ALLEN, Governor, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-11-M) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 5, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roy Lee Perry, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for clarification. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          20,417
<SECURITIES>                                     5,965
<RECEIVABLES>                                  194,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               232,642
<PP&E>                                          50,293
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,876
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 344,222
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,928
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,952
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     270,010
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   344,222
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               214,962
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  180,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   129
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  49
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,972
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,046
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,926
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-15140-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15055-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet at March 31, 1998 and the Statement of Income for the three months ended
March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              42
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,826
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,012
<INVENTORY>                                     42,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               160,008
<PP&E>                                       3,624,730
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,075,236
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,059,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          126,747
<BONDS>                                        684,064
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,065,634
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,059,749
<SALES>                                        134,566
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               134,566
<CGS>                                           25,920
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,533
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,517
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,102
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,415
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,415
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-15107-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15107-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15107-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15107-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15107-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15107-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15107-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15107-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15107-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15107-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15107-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15107-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15107-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13