alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32(b)

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Mark J. Plush, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Keithley
Instruments, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:



| |  |  | (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
ended June 30, 2003 which this certification accompanies fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.                                                                               

/s/ Mark J. Plush
Mark J. Plush
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2003

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Keithley
Instruments, Inc. and will be retained by Keithley Instruments, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:07-cv-03365-PAC Document 5-7 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03365-PAC Document 5-7 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. DALTON

No. 625P82.

Case below: 59 N.C. App. 238.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 11 January 1983.
Order entered April 15, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01042-CV

THANESTATE HD PLANO INVESTMENT INC., Appellant

V.

COLLIN CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-03884-2016

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s April 11, 2019 unopposed motion for an extension of time 

to file its reply brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to Monday, May 6, 2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
Case 1:07-cv-03329-HB     Document 1-2      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 21 MC 102 (AKH)

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER

SITE LITIGATION

VIRGINIA VILLA (and husband, RAFAEL VILLA), 06-CV- 15118 (AKH)

Plaintiffs, NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

-against100 CHURCH LLC, ET AL.,

Defendants.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby enters an appearance as counsel

for Defendants 100 CHURCH LLC and ZAR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. n/k/a

SAPIR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. in the above-captioned action and all future

correspondence and papers filed or serviced in connection with the above-captioned action are to

be directed to the undersigned.

Dated: New York, New York

September 10, 2007

Yours etc.,

HARRIS BEACH PLLC

Attorneys for Defendant

100 CHURCH LLC and ZAR REALTY

MANAGEMENT CORP. n/k/a SAPIR

REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP.

Is!

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG-7062)

100 Wall Street

New York, NY 10005

212 687-0100

212 687-0659 (Fax)

Case 1:06-cv-15118-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on September 10, 2007, I caused the following document

to be electronically via the Courts ECF system:

1. Notice of Appearance (of Defendants 100 Church LLC and Zar Realty

Management Corp. n/k/a Sapir Realty Management Corp.).

The undersigned further certifies that on September 10, 2007, I caused the aforesaid

documents to be served via First Class Mail upon the following:

Paul Napoli, Esq.

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP

115 Broadway, 12th Floor

New York, New York 10006

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

Robert A. Grochow, P.C.

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata

233 Broadway, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10279

Liaison Counselfor laint?fs

Dated: September 10, 2007

James E. Tyrrell, Esq.

Joseph Hopkins, Esq.

Patton Boggs LLP

1 Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor

Newark, New Jersey 07102

Thomas Egan, Esq.

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP

One Liberty Plaza

New York, New York 10006

Liaison Counselfor the Defendants

is!

Stanley Goos

Case 1:06-cv-15118-AKH Document 11 Filed 09/10/2007 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the filing by ARTISTdirect, Inc. (the Registrant) of its Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the Annual Report) with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, I, Robert N. Weingarten, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. Date:  May 13, 2005
    By:
    /s/ ROBERT N. WEINGARTENRobert N. WeingartenChief Financial Officer 116
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The U.S. Small Business Administration, Wisconsin District Advisory Council will be hosting a public meeting to discuss such matters that may be presented by members, and staff of the U.S. Small Business Administration, or others present. The meeting will be held on Tuesday, December 13, 2005 starting at 1:30 p.m. The meeting will be held at the U.S. Small Business Administration, Wisconsin-Milwaukee District Office, 310 West Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 400, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

                    Anyone wishing to attend must contact Cindy Merrigan in writing or by fax. Cindy Merrigan, Computer Specialist, U.S. Small Business Administration, 740 Regent Street, Suite 100, Madison, Wisconsin 53715, phone (608) 441-5560, fax (202) 481-0815, e-mail:                     *cindy.merrigan@sba.gov.*

Matthew K. Becker,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-23125 Filed 11-22-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 66-21 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 66-21 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 66-21 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### Carl Schwarze v. Henry Sierks.

1. Questions of *Fact—For the*Jury.—Questions of fact are for the determination of the jury.

Memorandum.—Assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Righakd S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 10, 1895.

Statement of the Case.

This is a suit commenced by appellee against appellant before a justice of the peace, and brought by appeal to the Circuit Court, upon a balance claimed to be due on a contract between appellant and appellee, the terms of which provided that appellee should render services as an architect in and about the construction of a certain block of buildings, in consideration of which services appellee should receive two and one-half per cent of the entire cost of such buildings. It is claimed by appellant that this contract, after being executed, was superseded by a new agreement which provided that instead of appellant receiving two and one-half per cent, he should receive the agreed sum of 0350, *216The issues were found against appellant for the full amount of appellee’s claim, $200.

Kraft, Williams & Kraft, attorneys for appellant.

George W. Plummer, attorney for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

We see no sufficient reason for interfering with the verdict y>f the jury upon the question of fact. The burden of proof under the contention of appellant was upon him, and we fail to find .any preponderance of the evidence in his favor. While we do not approve of the argument made by counsel for appellee in his address to the jury nor of the comments of the court thereon, yet we can not therefor reverse the judgment rendered, it being under the evidence no more than what the plaintiff was fairly entitled to, and it is therefore affirmed.
**Exhibit 99.10**

 

**CONSENT OF EXPERT**

 

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2014 to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) and Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of the Company for the year then ended, which are incorporated by reference therein.

 

The undersigned hereby consents to the references to, and the information derived from, the report titled “Technical Report for the Update on Exploration Drilling at the Waterberg Joint Venture and Waterberg Extension Projects, South Africa (Latitude 23° 14’ 11”S, Longitude 28° 54’ 42”E),” with an exploration drilling update effective date of October 21, 2014 and a mineral resource estimate effective date of June 12, 2014, and to the references, as applicable, to the undersigned’s name, in each case, included in or incorporated by reference in the 40-F, the AIF and the MD&A.

 

Coffey Mining South Africa Pty Ltd

 
| By:                            | /s/   Kenneth Lomberg |   |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Name:   Kenneth Lomberg        |                  |
| Title:   Senior Principal      |                  |
| Date:   November 24, 2014 |                  |
|                           |                  |
|                           |                  |
| /s/   Kenneth Lomberg          |                  |
| Kenneth   Lomberg              |                  |
| Date:   November 24, 2014 |                  |
|                           |                  |
|                           |                  |
| /s/   Alan Goldschmidt         |                  |
| Alan   Goldschmidt             |                  |
| Date:   November 24, 2014 |                  |

 

----
EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
            BAIRNCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
     CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
    FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
<CAPTION>
                              

                                    1997         1996         1995
<S>                                 <C>          <C>          <C> 
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Net Income                          $8,771,000   $8,335,000   $ 7,781,000

Average common shares outstanding    9,151,000    9,753,000    10,433,000

Basic Earnings Per Common Share     $     0.96   $     0.85   $      0.75


DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Net Income                          $8,771,000   $8,335,000   $ 7,781,000

Average common shares outstanding    9,151,000    9,753,000    10,433,000
Common shares issuable in respect
  to options issued to employees
  with a dilutive effect               199,000       98,000         7,000
Total common shares assuming full
  dilution                           9,350,000    9,851,000    10,440,000

Diluted Earnings Per Common Share   $     0.94   $     0.85   $      0.75


Basic  earnings per common share were computed  by  dividing
net  income  by  the weighted average number  of  shares  of
common stock outstanding during each year.  Diluted earnings
per  common  share include the effect of all dilutive  stock
options.
</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03011-LBS Document 17 Filed 06/25/2008 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-5 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-5 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-5 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-5 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-5 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-5 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-5 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-5 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-5 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 9 of 9
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5604 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5604

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2010

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To rescind amounts authorized for certain surface transportation 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Surface Transportation Savings Act 
of 2010''.

SEC. 2. SAFETY BELT PERFORMANCE GRANTS.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b), of the amounts 
authorized for fiscal year 2010 by section 2001(a)(4) of SAFETEA-LU 
(119 Stat. 1519) to carry out section 406 of title 23, United States 
Code, $80,994,029 is rescinded.
    (b) Limitation.--The amount rescinded pursuant to subsection (a) 
shall be decreased as necessary to ensure that not less than 
$28,505,971 is available for fiscal year 2010 to carry out section 406 
of title 23, United States Code.

SEC. 3. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.

    Of the amounts authorized for fiscal year 2010 by section 
2001(a)(11) of SAFETEA-LU (119 Stat. 1520), $6,547,000 is rescinded.

SEC. 4. NATIONAL DRIVER REGISTER.

    Of the amounts authorized for fiscal year 2010 by section 
2001(a)(7) of SAFETEA-LU (119 Stat. 1520) for the National Driver 
Register authorized under chapter 303 of title 49, United States Code, 
$78,000 is rescinded.

SEC. 5. NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION OPERATIONS AND 
              RESEARCH.

    Of the amounts authorized for fiscal year 2010 by section 
2001(a)(2) of SAFETEA-LU (119 Stat. 1519) to carry out section 403 of 
title 23, United States Code, $1,829,000 is rescinded.

SEC. 6. TRANSIT FORMULA AND BUS GRANTS.

    Of the amounts authorized for fiscal year 2010 by section 
5338(b)(1) of title 49, United States Code, to carry out sections 5305, 
5307, 5308, 5309, 5310, 5311, 5316, 5317, 5320, 5335, 5339, and 5340 of 
title 49, United States Code, and section 3038 of the Federal Transit 
Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 392), $17,394,000 is rescinded.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 20, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Case 1:06-cv-14849-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14849-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14849-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14849-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14849-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14849-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14849-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14849-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14849-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14849-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14849-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14849-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14849-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 13

- 00375

- CR Todd Andrew MAY , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CR2283B Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: August 21, 2013
DIS MISSED The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this c riminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; the refore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the underlying case is a plea

- bargain case. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure states “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part04

- 13

- 00375

- CR

of the record under these rules.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(d). On June 25, 2013, we ordered that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification showing that the appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record by July 25, 2013. Se e T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). No response was filed. In the absence of an amended trial court certification showing that the appellant has the right of appeal, R ule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2

-
##### 



Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors
Riggs National Corporation and subsidiaries:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-86590 on Form S-8 dated April 19, 2002, Registration Statement No.
333-76281 on Form S-8 dated April 14, 1999, Registration Statement No.
333-50185 on Form S-8 dated April 15, 1998, Registration Statement No.
333-50181 on Form S-8 dated April 15, 1998, Registration Statement No.
333-26447 on Form S-3 dated May 2, 1997, Post-effective Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement No. 333-26447 on Form S-3 dated June 3, 1997,
Registration Statement No. 333-21297 dated April 4, 1997, Post-effective
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-21297 on August 26, 1997,
Registration Statement No. 333-14609 on Form S-8 dated October 22, 1996,
Registration No. 33-56485 on Form S-8 dated November 15, 1994, Registration No.
33-52451 on Form S-8 dated March 1, 1994, Registration No. 33-51711 on Form S-8
dated December 28, 1993, and Registration Statement No. 333-74644 on Form S-8
dated December 6, 2001 of Riggs National Corporation and subsidiaries of our
report dated January 28, 2003, relating to the consolidated statement of
condition of Riggs National Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, which report
appears in the December 31, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K of Riggs National
Corporation and subsidiaries.



| | /s/ KPMG LLP
| | ------------

McLean, Virginia
March 10, 2003
#### HILL v. JONES

No. 182 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 168.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 25 August 1975.
Case 1:07-cv-03377-CM Document 6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03377-CM Document 6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF JACOBSON STORES INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES AS
OF, AND FOR THE THIRTY-NINE WEEK PERIOD ENDED, OCTOBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                                        <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                               OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              9-MOS
<CASH>                                                               3,980
<SECURITIES>                                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       29,424
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           471
<INVENTORY>                                                        105,044
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   142,849
<PP&E>                                                             175,722
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      91,637
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     247,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               59,094
<BONDS>                                                            118,060
<COMMON>                                                             5,975
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                                          57,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       247,429
<SALES>                                                            305,717
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   305,717
<CGS>                                                              206,045
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      206,045
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   5,807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     (8,235)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        (2,882)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 (5,353)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        (5,353)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                        (0.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        (0.93)
        

</TABLE>
#### MARTIN v. AMUSEMENTS OF AMERICA, INC.

No. 107 PC.

Case below: 38 N.C. App. 130.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 28 November 1978.