alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5551 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5551

 To require the Secretary of the Treasury to make a certification when 
    making purchases under the Small Business Lending Fund Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 2010

  Ms. Kosmas (for herself and Mr. Driehaus) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of the Treasury to make a certification when 
    making purchases under the Small Business Lending Fund Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTIFICATION UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS LENDING FUND PROGRAM.

    Each time the Secretary of the Treasury makes a purchase (including 
a commitment to purchase) or a modification of a purchase under the 
Small Business Lending Fund Program established under the Small 
Business Jobs and Credit Act of 2010, the Secretary shall certify, 
under oath, to the Inspector General of the Department of the Treasury, 
with a copy to the Comptroller General of the United States, that the 
Secretary of the Treasury is acting solely on the basis of economic 
fundamentals and not because of any political considerations.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP










To Jacobson Stores Inc.:

We are aware that Jacobson Stores Inc. has incorporated by reference in its Form
S-8 Registration Statements File Nos. 033-53469, 333-31989 and 333-59031 and
Form S-2 File No. 33-10532 its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 28, 2000,
which includes our report dated November 13, 2000, covering the unaudited
interim condensed consolidated financial information contained therein. Pursuant
to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a
part of the registration statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report
prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the
Act.


                                           Very truly yours,



                                            /s/  Arthur Andersen LLP
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Detroit, Michigan
December 8, 2000
PROMISSORY NOTE


US $_________________

_______________________
City, State





FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned Grant Hartford Corporation ("Borrower"),
located at 619 SW Higgins Ave., Missoula, MT  59803, promises to pay to the order of
______________________________ ("Note Holder"), the principal sum of ______________________
Dollars ($_______________) with ______________ percent (_____%) interest per annum.  Said
principal, plus accrued interest shall be payable in full on or before ________ months
and ______ years from the date of the Note.  All payments required to be made by the terms of
this Note shall be remitted to the Note Holder's designated address,
_______________________________________________, or such other address, as the Note Holder may
hereafter give notice to the Borrower in writing.


If said sum is not paid when due, the indebtedness shall bear interest at the
rate of 15% per annum from the date of default, or declaration of default, whichever shall first
occur.  The Note Holder shall be entitled to collect all reasonable costs and expenses of
collection and/or suit, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees.


It is specifically acknowledged that time is of the essence, and if payment
hereunder shall not actually be received by Note Holder, on a timely basis, the within Note
shall be in default.


Presentment notice of dishonor, and protest are hereby waived by Borrower
and all other makers, sureties, guarantors and indorses and their successors and assigns.


Any notice to Borrower provided for in this Note shall be in writing and
shall be given and be effective upon (1) delivery to Borrower or (2) mailing such notice by
certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to Borrower at the Borrower's address
stated herein, or to such other address as Borrower may designate by notice to the Note Holder.
Any notice to the Note Holder shall be in writing and shall be given and be effective upon
delivery to Note Holder or (2) by mailing such notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
to the Note Holder at the address stated in the first paragraph of this Note, or to such other
address as Note Holder may designate by notice to Borrower.

 

Grant Hartford Corporation

 


__________________________

Eric Sauve, President & CEO
#### CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM v. CONCRETE CO.

No. 386PC

Case below: 47 N.C. App. 405

Petition by plaintiff and intervenors for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 October 1980.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the annual  Report of Gameplan,  Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the
period  ended  December  31,  2003 as filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
dates indicated below,  hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.     the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.


Dated:  March 26, 2004                         /s/ Robert G. Berry
                                               ------------------------------
                                               Name: Robert G. Berry
                                               Title: Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  March 26, 2004                         /s/ Robert G. Berry
                                               ------------------------------
                                               Name: Robert G. Berry
                                               Title: Chief Financial Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Soldier Accounted-For From The Korean War (Lindquist, C.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BENNY L. JACKSON

No. 38 PC

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

INASMUCH as defendant did not assign as error on appeal the failure of the trial judge to place the burden of proving the absence of heat of passion or the absence of self-defense on the state, *see State v. Jackson,*284 N.C. 383 (1973), he has waived his right now to complain about such errors. *Hankerson v. North Carolina,*--- U.S. ---, 53 L.Ed. 2d 306, 316, n. 8 (1977). Now, therefore, it is

ORDERED by the Court in Conference that defendant’s motion for reconsideration be and it is hereby denied.

This the 12th day of September 1977.

James G. Exum, Jr. Associate Justice

For the Court
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-13 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-13 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 12-13 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 3 of 3
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1406 

To revise the boundaries of a unit of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 

Resources System in Topsail, North Carolina, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2019 

Mr. TILLIS (for himself and Mr. BURR) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

A BILL 

To revise the boundaries of a unit of the John H. Chafee 

Coastal Barrier Resources System in Topsail, North 

Carolina, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CORRECTION TO MAP. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the 

5 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 

6 shall make such corrections to the map described in sub7 section (b) as are necessary to exclude lots from unit L06 

8 of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 

9 in North Topsail Beach, North Carolina, that were servVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:38 May 17, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1406.IS S1406

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1406 IS

1 iced by infrastructure, as described in subsection (c), in2 stalled along North Carolina Highway 210 and New River 

3 Inlet Road as of the date of enactment of the Coastal Bar4 rier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). 

5 (b) MAPS DESCRIBED.—The map referred to in sub6 section (a) is a map that— 

7 (1) is included in a set of maps as part of the 

8 John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 

9 entitled ‘‘John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 

10 System’’ and dated December 21, 2018; and 

11 (2) relates to unit L06 of the John H. Chafee 

12 Coastal Barrier Resources System. 

13 (c) INFRASTRUCTURE DESCRIBED.— 

14 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), 

15 the infrastructure referred to in subsection (a) is in16 frastructure that meets the criteria described in sec17 tion 4(g)(1)(B) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act 

18 (16 U.S.C. 3503(g)(1)(B)). 

19 (2) INCLUSION.—For purposes of paragraph 

20 (1), North Carolina Highway 210 and New River 

21 Inlet Road shall be considered to meet the criteria 

22 described in section 4(g)(1)(B)(i) of the Coastal 

23 Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(g)(1)(B)(i)). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-03238-AKH Document 20 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03238-AKH Document 20 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 88 Filed 10/23/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 88 Filed 10/23/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-15049-AKH Document 11 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:06-cv-15049-AKH Document 11 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### Robert E. Dooley, Respondent, *v.*The Press Publishing Company, Appellant.

*Dooley*v. *Press Publishing Co.,*170 App, Div. 492, affirmed.

(Argued October 14, 1918;

decided October 29, 1918.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 11, 1916, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action for libel. Defendant was the publisher of the *World,*a newspaper published in New York city. The complaint alleged that said newspaper published an article falsely charging plaintiff, a police officer, with accepting and using a free pass issued to him by a taxicab company. The defense was that the article complained of was a fair and substantially true report of a public, official and judicial proceeding and the publication was made without malice.

*641
      *Howard Taylor*and *Charles B. Brophy*for appellant.

*Henry F. Cochrane*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, Pound and McLaughlin, JJ. Not voting: Andrews, J.
Case 1:06-cv-14975-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14975-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14975-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14975-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14975-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14975-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14975-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14975-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14975-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14975-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14975-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14975-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14975-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Exhibit 32(a)Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350I, Joseph P. Keithley, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of KeithleyInstruments, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2007which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Joseph P. Keithley Joseph P. Keithley  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer  May 10, 2007  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Keithley Instruments, Inc. andwill be retained by Keithley Instruments, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41231 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOE LOYCE FORD, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:95-CV-481

- - - - - - - - - - November 12, 198 Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1 Joe Loyce Ford, inmate # 04138-078, challenges the denial of his motion to vacate his sentence filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Ford’s claims that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel and ineffective assistance of appellate counsel are raised for the first time on appeal and do not entitle him to
§ 2255 relief. S trickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); Highlands Ins. v. National Union Fire Ins. , 27 F.3d 1027, 1032 (5th Cir . 1994). Nor does his claim that his direct appeal should be reinstated entitle him to such relief. Myers v. Collins , 8 F.3d 249, 252 (5th Cir. 1993).The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**KOSS CORPORATION**
**CERTIFICATION***
I, Michael J. Koss, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Koss Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation;  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: November 17, 2004     /s/ Michael J. Koss    Michael J. Koss  Chief Executive Officer, President and  Chief Financial Officer  
* Since Michael J. Koss is both the principal executive officer and theprincipal financial officer of the registrant, only one certification isprovided.
 21 of  22
#### STATE v. HILL

No. 214 PC.

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 652. .

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 29 August 1978.
#### RAILWAY CO. v. WERNER INDUSTRIES

No. 71 PC.

Case below: 21 N.C. App. 116.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 8 May 1974.
<PAGE> 1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.2
                                                                  ------------

                                   AMENDMENT
                                   ---------
                                      OF
                                      --
                             EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                             --------------------

This Amendment Agreement made this 26th day of November, 1996, between
Kellwood Company (the "Corporation") and William J. McKenna (the
"Executive");

WHEREAS, the Corporation and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement
dated December 9, 1992 (the "Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of this company effective May 1, 1996,
agreed to amend the Agreement to increase Executive's compensation to Eight
Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($850,000) per annum; and

WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of this company agreed to amend the
Agreement to extend its term for one more year until November 30, 1997; and

WHEREAS, the Corporation and Executive desire to amend the Agreement
accordingly.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises and undertakings,
the parties hereby amend the Agreement as follows:

1.    By deleting from paragraph 1 all references to the title "President"
      and inserting in their place the title "Chairman".

2.    By deleting from paragraph 1 the words "November 30, 1996" and
      inserting in their place "November 30, 1997".

3.    By deleting from paragraph 2 the amended amount of "Eight Hundred
      Twenty Thousand Dollars ($820,000)" and inserting in its place "Eight
      Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($850,000)".  This change shall be
      effective as of May 1, 1996.

4.    By deleting from paragraph 15 the words "November 30, 1996, the month
      in which Executive will reach age 70." and inserting in their place
      "November 30, 1997."

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment of Employment
Agreement the day and year first above written.

                              KELLWOOD COMPANY
Secretary

/s/ Thomas H. Pollihan        By:   /s/ James S. Marcus
----------------------            ---------------------------------
                                  James S. Marcus, Chairman,
                                  Compensation Committee

                              EXECUTIVE


/s/ Thomas H. Pollihan        /s/ William J. McKenna
----------------------        -------------------------------------
Witness                       William J. McKenna