70096 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 223 / Monday, November 21, 2005 / Notices 

a sensitive nature are collected. The 

requirement to respond is voluntary. 

Frequency of Response: Annually. 

Estimated Number and Description of 

Respondents: 125 Federal and Indian oil 

and gas and solid mineral royalty 

payors. 

Estimated Annual Reporting and 

Recordkeeping ‘‘Hour’’ Burden: 32 

hours. We estimate that each response 

will take 15 minutes. 

Estimated Annual Reporting and 

Recordkeeping ‘‘Non-hour Cost’’

Burden: We have identified no ‘‘nonhour cost’’ burden associated with the 

collection of information. 

Public Disclosure Statement: The PRA 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) provides that an 

agency may not conduct or sponsor, and 

a person is not required to respond to, 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. 

Comments: Before submitting an ICR 

to OMB, PRA Section 3506(c)(2)(A) 

requires each agency ‘‘* * * to provide 

notice * * * and otherwise consult 

with members of the public and affected 

agencies concerning each proposed 

collection of information * * *.’’

Agencies must specifically solicit 

comments to: (a) Evaluate whether the 

proposed collection of information is 

necessary for the agency to perform its 

duties, including whether the 

information is useful; (b) evaluate the 

accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the 

burden of the proposed collection of 

information; (c) enhance the quality, 

usefulness, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and (d) 

minimize the burden on the 

respondents, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

The PRA also requires agencies to 

estimate the total annual reporting 

‘‘non-hour cost’’ burden to respondents 

or recordkeepers resulting from the 

collection of information. If you have 

costs to generate, maintain, and disclose 

this information, you should comment 

and provide your total capital and 

startup cost components or annual 

operation, maintenance, and purchase 

of service components. You should 

describe the methods you use to 

estimate major cost factors, including 

system and technology acquisition, 

expected useful life of capital 

equipment, discount rate(s), and the 

period over which you incur costs. 

Capital and startup costs include, 

among other items, computers and 

software you purchase to prepare for 

collecting information; monitoring, 

sampling, and testing equipment; and 

record storage facilities. Generally, your 

estimates should not include equipment 

or services purchased: (i) Before October 

1, 1995; (ii) to comply with 

requirements not associated with the 

information collection; (iii) for reasons 

other than to provide information or 

keep records for the Government; or (iv) 

as part of customary and usual business 

or private practices. 

We will summarize written responses 

to this notice and address them in our 

ICR submission for OMB approval, 

including appropriate adjustments to 

the estimated burden. We will provide 

a copy of the ICR to you without charge 

upon request. The ICR also will be 

posted on our Web site at http:// 

www.mrm.mms.gov/Laws_R_D/ 

FRNotices/FRInfColl.htm. 

Public Comment Policy: We will post 

all comments in response to this notice 

on our Web site at http:// 

www.mrm.mms.gov/Laws_R_D/ 

FRNotices/FRInfColl.htm. We also will 

make copies of the comments available 

for public review, including names and 

addresses of respondents, during regular 

business hours at our offices in 

Lakewood, Colorado. Upon request, we 

will withhold an individual 

respondent’s home address from the 

public record, as allowable by law. 

There also may be circumstances in 

which we would withhold a 

respondent’s identity, as allowable by 

law. If you request that we withhold 

your name and/or address, state your 

request prominently at the beginning of 

your comment. However, we will not 

consider anonymous comments. We 

will make all submissions from 

organizations or businesses, and from 

individuals identifying themselves as 

representatives or officials of 

organizations or businesses, available 

for public inspection in their entirety. 

MMS Information Collection 

Clearance Officer: Arlene Bajusz, (202) 

208–7744. 

Cathy J. Hamilton, 

Acting Associate Director for Minerals 

Revenue Management. 

[FR Doc. 05–22954 Filed 11–18–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

Notice of Availability of a Draft 

Environmental Impact Statement for 

the Fort King Special Resource Study 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) 

of the National Environmental Policy 

Act of 1969, the National Park Service 

(NPS) announces the availability of a 

Draft Environmental Impact Statement 

(DEIS) for the Fort King Special 

Resource Study. The document 

describes ways that the NPS may assist 

in preserving the Fort King site by 

outlining four management alternatives 

for consideration by Congress, including 

a no-action alternative. The DEIS 

analyzes the environmental impacts of 

those alternatives considered for the 

future protection, interpretation, and 

management of the site’s cultural 

resources. The 37-acre study area is 

located in the city of Ocala, Marion 

County, Florida. 

DATES: There will be a 60-day comment 

period beginning with the 

Environmental Protection Agency’s 

publication of its notice of availability 

in the Federal Register. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of the DEIS are 

available by contacting Tim 

Bemisderfer, Planning and Compliance 

Division, Southeast Region, National 

Park Service, 100 Alabama Street, SW., 

1924 Building, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. 

An electronic copy of the DEIS is 

available on the Internet at http:// 

www.nps.gov/sero/planning. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim 

Bemisderfer, 404–562–3124, extension 

693. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NPS 

held a series of community and 

stakeholder meetings in 2002 and 2003 

to gather advice and feedback on 

desired outcomes of the study. The 

meetings assisted the NPS in developing 

alternatives for managing associated 

cultural and natural resources and 

creating interpretive and educational 

programs. Responses from the meetings 

were incorporated into the four 

alternatives described in the study. 

Alternative A is the no-action 

alternative. For the purposes of this 

study, it is assumed that the Fort King 

site would continue to be owned and 

managed cooperatively by the city of 

Ocala, Marion County, and the Ocala 

Chapter of the Daughters of the 

American Revolution. The site would 

remain predominantly undeveloped, 

public access would be restricted, and 

the site’s archaeological resources 

would be protected and preserved in an 

undisturbed condition. Under 

Alternative B, the site’s archaeological 

resources would be preserved and 

interpreted in-situ. Alternative B, takes 

a conservative approach to site 

development that favors a simple and 

low cost implementation strategy. 

Under Alternative C, existing site 

infrastructure would be used as a base 

to quickly and efficiently provide public 

access and interpretive services. 

Alternative C favors a development 

strategy that builds upon a modest 

initial investment that can be expanded 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 223 / Monday, November 21, 2005 / Notices 70097 

over time as additional funding and 

resources are secured. 

Under Alternative D, Fort King would 

highlight the site’s strong association 

with nationally significant historical 

events and interpretive themes. 

Alternative D takes an aggressive 

approach to site development. Its larger 

initial investment in cultural landscape 

rehabilitation and visitor service 

infrastructure is intended to quickly 

establish the name recognition and 

credibility necessary to attract higher 

profile partners and compete for private 

and public financing. 

It is the practice of the NPS to make 

comments, including names and home 

addresses of respondents, available for 

public review during regular business 

hours. Anonymous comments will not 

be considered. We will make 

submissions from organizations or 

businesses, and from individuals 

identifying themselves as 

representatives or officials of 

organizations or businesses, available 

for public inspection in their entirety. 

However, individual respondents may 

request that we withhold their names 

and addresses from the public record, 

and we will honor such requests to the 

extent allowed by law. If you wish to 

withhold your name/address, you must 

state that request prominently at the 

beginning of your comment. 

The responsible official for the DEIS 

is Patricia A. Hooks, Regional Director, 

Southeast Region, National Park 

Service, 100 Alabama Street, SW., 1924 

Building, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. 

Dated: October 11, 2005. 

Patricia A. Hooks, 

Regional Director, Southeast Region. 

[FR Doc. 05–22946 Filed 11–18–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–M 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

Notice of Availability of a Record of 

Decision for the Selma to Montgomery 

National Historic Trail Comprehensive 

Management Plan and Final 

Environmental Impact Statement 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) 

of the National Environmental Policy 

Act of 1969, the National Park Service 

(NPS) announces the availability of the 

Record of Decision (ROD) for the Selma 

to Montgomery National Historic Trail 

Comprehensive Management Plan and 

Final Environmental Impact Statement 

(CMP/EIS). The ROD provides the 

background of the CMP/EIS, other 

alternatives considered, the basis for the 

decision, the environmentally preferable 

alternative, and public involvement in 

the decision-making process. The ROD 

was approved by the Southeast Regional 

Director on August 30, 2005. The CMP/ 

EIS provides a framework for the 

management, use, and development of 

the National Historic Trail by the NPS 

and its partners over the next 15 to 20 

years. Beginning at Brown Chapel AME 

Church in Selma, Alabama, the trail 

follows the route of the March 1965 

Selma to Montgomery voting rights 

march, traveling through Lowndes 

County along U.S. Highway 80, and 

ending at the Alabama State Capitol in 

Montgomery. The CMP/EIS describes 

four management alternatives for 

consideration and analyzes the 

environmental impacts of those 

alternatives. As soon as practicable, the 

NPS will begin to implement the plan 

and the preferred alternative, known as 

Alternative C. Of the four alternatives 

presented in the plan, Alternative C 

stresses the broadest range of 

interpretive themes relating to the 

events of March 1965 and provides an 

extensive plan for resource preservation, 

protection, and commemoration. Among 

its priorities is the coordinated 

protection of historically intact 

viewsheds along US Highway 80, the 

most extensive certification of 

commemorative sites and streetscapes, 

design proposals for new park spaces, 

and marked walking and biking rails. 

Alternative C also outlines a strategy for 

establishing interpretive centers and 

development of corresponding 

interpretive programs in Selma, 

Montgomery, and Lowndes County. 

DATES: The ROD was signed by the 

Southeast Regional Director on August 

30, 2005. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of the ROD are 

available by contacting John Barrett, 

National Park Service, 100 Alabama St., 

SW., Atlanta, GA 30303. An electronic 

copy of the ROD is available on the 

Internet at http://www.nps.gov/sero/ 

planning/semo_cmp/ 

semo_cmpdraft.htm. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Barrett, 404–562–3124, extension 637. 

The responsible official for the ROD 

and the CMP/EIS is Patricia A. Hooks, 

Regional Director, Southeast Region, 

National Park Service, 100 Alabama 

Street SW., 1924 Building, Atlanta, 

Georgia 30303. 

Dated: September 21, 2005. 

Patricia A. Hooks, 

Regional Director, Southeast Region. 

[FR Doc. 05–22947 Filed 11–18–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–52–M 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

Boston Harbor Islands Advisory 

Council; Notice of Meeting 

Notice is hereby given in accordance 

with the Federal Advisory Committee 

Act (PL 92–463) that the Boston Harbor 

Islands Advisory Council will meet on 

Wednesday, December 7, 2005. The 

meeting will convene at 4 p.m. at the 

Boston Children’s Museum, 300 

Congress Street, Dewey Room, Boston, 

MA. 

The Advisory Council was appointed 

by the Director of National Park Service 

pursuant to Public Law 104–333. The 28 

members represent business, 

educational/cultural, community and 

environmental entities; municipalities 

surrounding Boston Harbor; Boston 

Harbor advocates; and Native American 

interests. The purpose of the Council is 

to advise and make recommendations to 

the Boston Harbor Islands Partnership 

with respect to the development and 

implementation of a management plan 

and the operations of the Boston Harbor 

Islands national park area. 

The Agenda for this meeting is as follows: 

1. Call to Order, Introductions of Advisory 

Council members present 

2. Review and approval of minutes of the 

September meeting 

3. Analysis of 5-year Strategic Plan 

4. Preparation for the March Elections 

5. Park Update 

• Summer Review 

• Outer Brewster 

1. New Business 

2. Public Comment 

3. Adjourn 

The meeting is open to the public. Further 

information concerning Council meetings 

may be obtained from the Superintendent, 

Boston Harbor Islands. Interested persons 

may make oral/written presentations to the 

Council or file written statements. Such 

requests should be made at least seven days 

prior to the meeting to: Superintendent, 

Boston Harbor Islands NRA, 408 Atlantic 

Avenue, Boston, MA, 02110, telephone (617) 

223–8669. 

Dated: October 11, 2005. 

Bruce Jacobson, 

Superintendent, Boston Harbor Islands NRA. 

[FR Doc. 05–22945 Filed 11–18–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P