alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(b)
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
I, Mark J. Plush, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of KeithleyInstruments, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and reportfinancial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 9, 2004 /s/ Mark J. Plush   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cr-00368-RWS Document 8 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1696 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1696

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to eliminate origination fees 
                        on Federal Direct loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 3, 2019

    Mr. Braun (for himself, Ms. Sinema, Mr. Coons, and Mr. Scott of 
   Florida) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to eliminate origination fees 
                        on Federal Direct loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Student Loan Tax Elimination Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF ORIGINATION FEES ON FEDERAL DIRECT LOANS.

    (a) Repeal of Origination Fees.--Subsection (c) of section 455 of 
the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(c)) is repealed.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to loans made under part D of title IV of the Higher 
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.) for which the first 
disbursement of principal is made, or, in the case of a Federal Direct 
Consolidation Loan, the application is received, on or after July 1, 
2019.
                                 <all>
```
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Part 510
 AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
 ACTION: Final rule.
 SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal drug regulations to reflect a change of sponsor's address for Schering-Plough Animal Health Corp.
 DATES: This rule is effective November 25, 2005.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David R. Newkirk, Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV-100), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 301-827-6967, e-mail: 
                        *david.newkirk@fda.gov*.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Schering-Plough Animal Health Corp., 1095 Morris Ave., Union, NJ 07083, has informed FDA of a change of address to 556 Morris Ave., Summit, NJ 07901.  Accordingly, the agency is amending the regulations in 21 CFR 510.600(c) to reflect the change. This rule does not meet the definition of “rule” in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because it is a rule of “particular applicability.” 
                    ( print page 70997)
                     Therefore, it is not subject to the congressional review requirements in 5 U.S.C. 801-808. List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 510 Administrative practice and procedure
Animal drugs
Labeling
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
 Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR part 510 is amended as follows: PART 510—NEW ANIMAL DRUGS
 1.The authority citation for 21 CFR part 510 continues to read as follows: Authority:
                        21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352, 353, 360b, 371, 379e. 2.Section 510.600 is amended in the table in paragraph (c)(1) by revising the entry for “Schering-Plough Animal Health Corp.”; and in the table in paragraph (c)(2) by revising the entry for “000061” to read as follows. § 510.600
 
 (c)  *     *     * (1)  *     *     * Firm name and address
Drug labeler code*    *    *    *    *Schering-Plough Animal Health Corp., 556 Morris Ave., Summit, NJ 07901
000061*    *    *    *    *
 (2)  *     *     * Drug labeler code
Firm name and address*    *    *    *    *000061
Schering-Plough Animal Health Corp., 556 Morris Ave., Summit, NJ 07901*    *    *    *    *
 Dated: November 15, 2005. Steven D. Vaughn, Director, Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation, Center for Veterinary Medicine.


[FR Doc. 05-23296 Filed 11-23-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
#### FINANCE CO. v. FINANCE CO.

No. 176 PC.

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 401.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 29 August 1978.
#### STATE v. GOLLETT

No. 253 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 585.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 October 1981.
EXHIBIT 21









BAIRNCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES



Subsidiaries of Registrant

as of March 20, 2001





|                                  | Percentage | State/Country of
|--------------------------------- | ---------- | ----------------
|                                  | Ownership  | Incorporation   
|                                  |            |                 
|                                  |            |                 
|Arlon, Inc.                       | 100%       | Delaware        
|Kasco Corporation                 | 100%       | Delaware        
|Bairnco Foreign Sales Corporation | 100%       | Barbados        
|MII International, Inc. (1)       | 100%       | Delaware        
|Arlon Adhesives & Films, Inc. (1) | 100%       | Texas           
|Arlon Partners, Inc. (1)          | 100%       | Delaware        
|Arlon Signtech, Ltd.(1)           | 100%       | Texas           
|Arlon Viscor, Ltd.(1)             | 100%       | Texas           
|Bertram & Graf GmbH(1)            | 100%       | Germany         
|Atlantic Service Co. Ltd.(1)      | 100%       | Canada          
|Atlantic Service Co. (UK) Ltd.(1) | 100%       | United Kingdom  
|EuroKasco S.A.(1)                 | 100%       | France          













(1) Indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Bairnco Corporation.
#### STATE v. FELMET

No. 306 PC

No. 129 (Fall Term)

Case below: 47 NC App 201

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 16 September 1980. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of public interest allowed 16 September 1980.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5539 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5539

    To apply the Freedom of Information Act to the Federal National 
  Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 
    during any period that such entities are in conservatorship or 
                             receivership.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 2010

 Mr. Chaffetz (for himself, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Issa, 
Mr. Bachus, Mr. Hensarling, Mr. Royce, Mr. Goodlatte, Mrs. Biggert, Mr. 
   Rooney, and Mrs. Lummis) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To apply the Freedom of Information Act to the Federal National 
  Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 
    during any period that such entities are in conservatorship or 
                             receivership.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac 
Transparency Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY OF FOIA DURING CONSERVATORSHIP OR RECEIVERSHIP.

    (a) Fannie Mae.--Section 309 of the Federal National Mortgage 
Association Charter Act (12 U.S.C. 1723a) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new subsection:
    ``(p) Applicability of FOIA.--Notwithstanding section 551 of title 
5, United States Code, during any period that the corporation is under 
conservatorship or receivership pursuant to section 1367 of the Federal 
Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 
U.S.C. 4617), the corporation shall be considered to be an agency for 
purposes of section 552 of such title.''.
    (b) Freddie Mac.--Section 307 of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage 
Corporation Act (12 U.S.C. 1456) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subsection:
    ``(h) Applicability of FOIA.--Notwithstanding section 551 of title 
5, United States Code, during any period that the Corporation is under 
conservatorship or receivership pursuant to section 1367 of the Federal 
Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 
U.S.C. 4617), the Corporation shall be considered to be an agency for 
purposes of section 552 of such title.''.
                                 <all>
```
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

I N RE STAN CIPKOWSKI

______________________

2012

- 1552

______________________

Appeal from the United State s Patent and Trademark

Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in

Serial No 08/981,665

.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

B. A ARON S CHULMAN , Stites & Harbison, PLLC, of A lexandria, Virginia, argued for the appellant

.

L ORE A. U NT , Associate Solicitor, United States P atent & Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued

for appellee. With her on the brief were R AYMOND T.

C HEN , Solicitor, and K RISTI L. R. S AWERT , Associate Solic itor.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE

, P LAGER

, and W ALLACH

, Circuit

Judges)

.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

March 1 4 , 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk
Case 1:06-cv-15139-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### UTILITIES COMM. v. TELEGRAPH CO.

No. 82 PC.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 714.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 8 November 1974.
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 10-8 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 10-8 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 10-8 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                              CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Metron Technology N.V.

    The audits referred to in our report dated July 6, 2000, included the
related financial statement schedule as of May 31, 2000, and for each of the
years in the three-year period ended May 31, 2000, included in the Form 10-K/A.
This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial
statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, this financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 333-93627) on Form S-8 of Metron Technology N.V. of our report dated
July 6, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Metron
Technology N.V. and subsidiaries as of May 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended May 31, 2000 and the related
schedule, which report appears in the May 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K/A
of Metron Technology N.V.

                                          /s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California
September 15, 2000
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jackie Webster Dennis, Appellant

No. 06-22-00069-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 4th District Court of Rusk

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR19-337). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

van Cleef, Chief Justice Stevens and Justice 

Rambin participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment (1) to reflect that 

the proper statute of offense is Section 22.01(b-3) and (2) by deleting the $450.00 assessment for 

court-appointed attorney fees. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Jackie Webster Dennis, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JANUARY 31, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
~ 

 ~~~~  .. .. .  .. , . ,. IljElll .:;,.;. -:, .. . .. - :. -.; LsL&;:,:.-<::* *:s *.-**.$.&: , -ps : , ," : , , j~~n~~A.,'-:d.--.--i- . ~ 

U. 1 3 2007 USDC SDWf 

D0rnhlEN-K 

S DlSTRlCT COURT ELECTRONIC" L.T,k' FILED 

SOUTHERN DlSTRICT OF NEW YORK 

-------.....-------------...-..----------------------- 

ES&G TRADING. INC.. 

Plaintiff, Case No. 07 CV 3371 (RPP) 

against - 

SUN CAPITAL. TNC., 

Defendant 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION 

PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a)( 1 ) 

TO COUNSEL: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that the instant action having been commenced b\ the filing of 

a complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, on March 14, 

2007 under Index Number 10350612007, and the matter having been removed to this Court by 

Notice of Removal filed herein on April 27, 2007, and no answer or motion for summary 

judgment having been filed by an adverse party, the Plaintiff hereb) voluntary dismisses the 

action pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(I) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 

Dated: New York, N.Y. 

July 1 I, 2007 

RICHARD L. KORAL, ESQ 

(RK 2498) 

60 East 4Td St., Suite 1336 

New York: N.Y. 10165 

682-1212 

Case 1:07-cv-03371-RPP Document 7 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. DURDEN

No. 25 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 405.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 September 1976 for lack of merit.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**FORM10-Q**

 

**Section 1350Certifications**

 

**Quarterended September 30, 2004**

 

I, Herbert Lindo, Chairman, President and PrincipalFinancial Officer of Kenilworth Systems Corporation (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)               the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the third quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)               the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Dated: November 13, 2004

 

 

|   |   | /s/  Herbert Lindo                                   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Herbert  Lindo                                       |
|   |   | Chairman,  President and Principal Financial Officer |

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-03417-DAB-DCF Document 13 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03417-DAB-DCF Document 13 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03417-DAB-DCF Document 13 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03417-DAB-DCF Document 13 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03417-DAB-DCF Document 13 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03417-DAB-DCF Document 13 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03417-DAB-DCF Document 13 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03417-DAB-DCF Document 13 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03417-DAB-DCF Document 13 Filed 07/25/2007 Page 9 of 9
Case 1:06-cv-15149-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
****Exhibit 31.1****


**CERTIFICATION**





|I, C. Michael Jacobi, certify that:
|-----------------------------------
|                                   
|1.                                 
|                                   
|2.                                 
|                                   
|3.                                 
|                                   
|4.                                 
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|5.                                 
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   




|Date: November 10, 2004 | By: | /s/ C. Michael Jacobi
C. Michael Jacobi
Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------



42
Case 1:07-cv-03364-LAK Document 5 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03364-LAK Document 5 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03364-LAK Document 5 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03364-LAK Document 5 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-15137-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### IN RE YORK

No. 134 PC.

Case below: 18 N.C. App. 425.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 August 1973.
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 15-8 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 15-8 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 15-8 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of ISA Internationale Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1.) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operation of the Company.  By: /s/ Bernard L. Brodkorb Bernard L. Brodkorb, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, Chairman of the Board  Dated: January 14, 2013
Case 1:06-cv-14967-AKH Document 6 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-14967-AKH Document 6 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 11-6 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 11-6 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 11-6 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 11-6 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 11-6 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 11-6 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 11-6 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 11-6 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 11-6 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 11-6 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 11-6 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 11-6 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 11-6 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 11-6 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 11-6 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 11-6 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 11-6 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 11-6 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 11-6 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 11-6 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 20 of 20