alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 6258

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. OSCAR ANTONIO GRANDE, a/k/a Pantera , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Rossie David Alston, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:04

- cr - 00283

- RDA

- 2 )

Submitted : December 15, 2022 Decided: December 19, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge , and WILKINSON and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

ON BRIEF: Lana Manitta, LAW OFFICE OF LANA MANITTA, PLLC, Purcellville, Virginia, for Appellant. Jessica D. Aber, United States Attorney, Joseph Attias, Assis tant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6258 Doc: 26 Filed: 12/19/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Oscar Antonio Grande appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release , brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239

. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its d iscretion in denying Grande’s motion. See United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (per curiam) (stating standard of review ) , cert. denied , 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021)

. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’ s order

. United States v. Grande , No. 1:04

- cr - 00283

- RDA

- 2 (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 8, 2022 & entered Feb. 10, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would n ot aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6258 Doc: 26 Filed: 12/19/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Opinion filed March 31, 2022



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

______ _

___ No. 11

- 22

- 00 061

- C R

__________ IN RE RONNY MARK ALDRIDGE

Original Mandamus Proceeding

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Relator, Ronny Mark Aldridge , has filed a pro se petit ion for writ of mandamus in this court

. He requests mandamus relief against the “Texas Board of Pardons & Paroles” and the “Texas Department of Criminal Justice Par ole Review Department

. ” We dismiss Relator ’ s petition for want of jurisdicti on

. A n intermediate court of appeals has no general writ power over a person other than certain judge s “in the court of appeals district”

— unless issuance of the writ is necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the court of appeals

. T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 22.221 (a) , (b) ( West Supp. 20 2 1 ). Relator has not asserted that a writ of mandamus directed to the respondents named in the petition is necessary to enforce this court’ s jurisdiction. Furthermore, we have no general writ power over2 the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles or the Parole Review Department of the TDCJ

. See id. § 22.221 (b) (general mandamus jurisdiction over certain judges only ); In re Wilson , No. 01

- 20

- 00557

- CR, 2020 WL 6140178, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 20, 2020, orig. proceeding ) (mem. op. , not designated for publication ) (holding that court of appeals had no jurisdiction to issue a mandamus against the Texas Board of Pardon s and Paroles)

. Because w e do not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against either of the respondents named in Relator’s petition , we must dismiss Relator’s petition

. Accordingly, Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for wan t of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

March 31, 2022 Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Bailey, C. J. , Trott er , J. , and W ill iams , J.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Louis Anderson against Johnson Lighterage Company et al., Respondents. State Industrial Commission, Appellant.

Workmen’s compensation — state industrial commission without jurisdiction to m.ake award to workmen injured while engaged on maritime contract.

A longshoreman employed in loading a vessel in navigable waters is engaged in the performance of a maritime contract and the state industrial commission has" no jurisdiction to make an award for an injury sustained by his slipping on the pier from which the cargo was being taken. *Matter of Doey*v. *Howland Co., Inc.,*224 N. Y. 30, followed.

*Anderson*v. *Johnson Lighterage Co.,*182 App. Div. 152, affirmed.

(Argued April 25, 1918;

decided June 4, 1918.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 8, 1918, reversing an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law and dismissing the claim.

*Merton E. Lewis, Attorney-General (E. C. Aiken*of counsel), for appellant.

*Bertrand L. Pettigrew*and *W. L. Glenney*for respondents.

McLaughlin, J.

The claimant, at the time he was injured, was a longshoreman in the employ of the Johnson Lighterage Company, which had a contract to load a vessel in navigable waters. While thus engaged he sustained an injury by slipping on a pier from which the cargo was being taken. He made a claim under the Workmen’s Compensation Law and the industrial commission allowed the same. Its award was reversed by *540the Appellate Division, the claim dismissed, and the commission appeals to this court.

In my opinion, for the reasons stated by me in *Matter of Doey*v. *Howland Co., Inc.,*decided herewith, Anderson, at the time he was injured, was engaged in performing a maritime contract. The industrial commission, therefore, had no-jurisdiction to make the award; it was properly vacated by the Appellate Division, and the claim dismissed.

The order of the Appellate Division, therefore, should be affirmed, with costs against the state industrial commission.

His cock, Ch. J., Chase and Collin, JJ., concur; Cuddeback, Hogan and Cardozo, JJ., dissent.

Order affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 13

                         O2 Micro International Limited

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of O2 Micro International Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of Sterling Du,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Perry Kuo, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of his knowledge:

                (1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of
                        Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
                        Exchange Act of 1934, and

                (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                        in all material respects, the financial condition and
                        results of operations of the Company at the dates and
                        for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: June 20, 2005                                /s/ STERLING DU
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                                      Sterling Du
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: June 20, 2005                                 /s/ PERRY KUO
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                                      Perry Kuo
                                               Chief Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cv-03248-JFK Document 43 Filed 08/12/2008 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03248-JFK Document 43 Filed 08/12/2008 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03248-JFK Document 43 Filed 08/12/2008 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03248-JFK Document 43 Filed 08/12/2008 Page 4 of 4
ex10_1.htm


 


(Translation)





Verification





It is verified hereto that the business license for a foreign invested enterprise (“FIE”) was issued to Heilongjiang
Weikang Bio-Technology Group Co., Ltd. (“Heilongjiang Weikang”) by Heilongjiang Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (“Heilongjiang SAIC”) on November 9, 2007. The license number is 230100100022961. The expiration date of business license will be extended to June 30, 2010 due to global financial crisis. During
this period, Heilongjiang Weikang’s operation complies with the laws.





























 













Heilongjiang Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (seal)

August 7,2009
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1653 

To amend section 3063 of title 18, United States Code, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23 (legislative day, MAY 22), 2019 

Mr. SULLIVAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend section 3063 of title 18, United States Code, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POWERS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTEC4 TION AGENCY. 

5 Section 3063 of title 18, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a)— 

8 (A) by striking paragraph (1); and 

9 (B) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and 

10 (3) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1653 IS

1 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(c) The guidelines approved under subsection (b) 

3 shall require that a law enforcement officer described in 

4 subsection (a) provide notice to appropriate State and 

5 local law enforcement agencies before executing and serv6 ing any warrant.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.41 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 99.2

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

The Partners
Lynndale Apartments, Ltd.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Lynndale Apartments, Ltd. (a
limited partnership) as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related
statements of profit and loss, partners' deficit, and cash flows for the years
then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Lynndale Apartments, Ltd. as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of its operations, changes in
partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


/s/ Dees, Jackson, Jackson & Associates, P.A.

Certified Public Accountants
Smithfield, North Carolina
February 17, 2006
ex99-2.htm


Exhibit 99.2

 

 

Case 3:09-cv-01337-JAP     Document 70      Filed 08/17/2009     Page 1 of 2

 

 

FOR PUBLICATION

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY





 


	  	  	  
	  	
:
	
Civil Action No. 09-1337 (JAP)

	
In re: CONGOLEUM CORPORATION,
	
:
	  
	  	
:
	  
	
Debtors.
	
:
	
ORDER

	  	
:
	  
	  	  	  







 

Before the Court is an appeal from two Orders of the Bankruptcy Court denying confirmation of an Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code dated November 14, 2008 (the “Plan”), submitted by the Plan Proponents1/Appellants,
and dismissing the Debtors’ bankruptcy cases.  This Court has jurisdiction to hear the instant appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(a). Oral argument was held on this matter on July 1, 2009.  For the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion,

IT IS on this 17th day of August, 2009,

ORDERED that the Order of the Bankruptcy Court dated February 27, 2009, granting summary judgment and denying confirmation of the Twelfth Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, is hereby AFFIRMED
IN PART and REVERSED IN PART, consistent with the accompanying Opinion; and it is,

FURTHER ORDERED that the Order of the Bankruptcy Court dated February 26, 2009, dismissing Debtors’ bankruptcy case is hereby REVERSED; and it is,

 

___________________________________

1   “Plan Proponents” shall be used to refer to the following parties: Congoleum Corp., Congoleum Sales, Inc., Congoleum Fiscal, Inc. (collectively, “Company,”
“Congoleum” or “Debtors”), the Asbestos Claimants’ Committee (the official committee of asbestos claimants appointed in the Debtors’ bankruptcy cases), and the Bondholders’ Committee (the official committee of bondholders appointed in the Debtors’ bankruptcy cases).





  



  







  





Case 3:09-cv-01337-JAP     Document 70      Filed 08/17/2009     Page 2 of 2

 

 

FURTHER ORDERED that this Court withdraws the reference for this proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(d)






	  	
/s/ JOEL A. PISANO   

	  	
United States District Judge
Case 1:07-cv-03360-GBD     Document 8      Filed 11/05/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-03360-GBD     Document 8      Filed 11/05/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-03360-GBD     Document 8      Filed 11/05/2007     Page 3 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-15146-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cr-00344-JGK Document 1 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 2 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 3 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 4 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 5 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 6 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 7 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 8 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 9 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 10 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 11 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 12 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 13 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 14 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 15 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 16 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 17 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 18 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 19 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 20 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 21 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 22 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 23 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 24 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 25 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 26 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 27 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 28 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 29 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 30 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 31 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 32 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 33 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 34 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 35 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 36 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 37 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 38 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 39 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 40 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 41 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 42 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 43 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 44 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 45 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 46 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 47 of 48
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 8-2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 48 of 48
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 16 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 1 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 2 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 3 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 4 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 5 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 6 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 7 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 8 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 9 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 10 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 11 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 12 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 13 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 14 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 15 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 16 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 17 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 18 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 19 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 20 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 21 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 22 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 23 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 24 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 25 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 26 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 27 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 28 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 29 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 30 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 31 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 32 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 33 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 34 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 35 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 36 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 37 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 38 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 39 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 40 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 41 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 42 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 43 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 44 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 45 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 46 of 47
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 8-6 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 47 of 47