alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 226 (Friday, November 25, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71087-71088]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23288]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 102705A]


Marine Mammals; File No. 774-1649-03

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of permit amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Permit No. 774-1649-02 issued to 
the Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries 
Service, 8604 La Jolla Shores Drive, La Jolla, California 92038 
(Principle Investigator: Rennie Holt, Ph.D.) has been amended.

ADDRESSES: The permit and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following office(s):
    Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; 
phone (301)713-2289; fax (301)713-0376; and

[[Page 71088]]

    Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long 
Beach, CA 90802-4213; phone (562)980-4001; fax (562)980-4018;

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ruth Johnson or Tammy Adams (301)713-
2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 3, 2005, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (70 FR 57566) that an amendment of Permit No. 774-
1649-02 had been requested by the above-named organization. The 
requested amendment has been granted under authority of the Marine 
Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), and 
the Regulations Governing the Taking and Importing of Marine Mammals 
(50 CFR part 216).
    The amended permit authorizes the Holder to administer isotopes 
(doubly-labeled water (DLW)) to and collect serial blood samples from 
up to 15 Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus gazelle) females and 30 pups 
to study female/pup energetics and maternal investment.

    Dated: November 21, 2005.
Stephen L. Leathery,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of 
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05-23288 Filed 11-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
#### Samuel H. Lummis, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of J. Spencer Crosby & Co., Appellant, *v.*J. Spencer Crosby et al., Defendants, and Anna H. Stier, Respondent.

*Lummis*v. *Crosby,*181 App. Div. 884, affirmed.

(Argued September 30, 1918;

decided October 15, 1918.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 2, 1917, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion by defendant, respondent, for judgment on the pleadings. This action was brought under sections 90, 91 and 91-a of the General Corporation Law, to compel the defendants (other than the defendant corporation) to account for their official conduct in the management and disposition of the funds of the corporation of J. Spencer Crosby & Company, and compelling them to pay to the corporation or its creditors any money', and value of any property which they had illegally acquired to themselves or transferred to others through any neglect of or failure to perform or of any other violation of their duties. The complaint alleged that the respondent Stier some six months before the defendant Crosby & Co. was adjudicated bankrupt was an officer and stockholder thereof, and that the president of said corporation purchased her stock paying her therefor out of the funds of the corporation. The complaint was held insufficient on the ground that it failed to allege that any of the creditors were such at the time of the diversion of the corporate property. The following questions were certified: “ 1. Does the complaint in this action set forth a cause of action? 2. Is the order of the court below sustaining judgment in favor of the respondent on the pleadings correct? ”

*Irving L. Ernst*for appellant.

*Lynn C. Norris*and *Arthur P. Hilton*for respondent.

*612Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan and McLaughlin, JJ. Not sitting: Crane, J.
Case 1:07-cv-03372-VM Document 5 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03372-VM Document 5 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### FITCH v. FITCH

No. 35 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 570.

■ Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 September 1975.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,081,607
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,031,863
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 12,163,224
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,510,009
<PP&E>                                      14,215,291
<DEPRECIATION>                            (12,440,773)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,463,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,945,816
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,111
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,436,530
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,463,641
<SALES>                                      8,393,253
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,393,253
<CGS>                                        4,913,277
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,913,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,830,587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (16,799)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,940,820
<INCOME-TAX>                                   757,203
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,183,617
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43


</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-15127-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15127-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15127-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15127-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15127-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15127-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15127-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15127-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15127-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15127-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15127-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15127-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15127-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Case 1:07-cr-00332-HB Document 10 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 1 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00332-HB Document 10 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 2 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00332-HB Document 10 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 3 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00332-HB Document 10 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 4 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00332-HB Document 10 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 5 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00332-HB Document 10 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 6 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03232-CS-LMS     Document 25      Filed 09/02/2008     Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50565

Summary Calendar

 

SALLY BARNES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(SA-01-CV-613)

- - - - - - - - - -

January 2, 2003

Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant Sally Barnes appeals the district court’s

affirmance of the Social Security Commissioner’s decision to deny

her disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. 

Barnes contends that the Commissioner’s decision was not

supported by “substantial evidence”; specifically, that the

Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred in determining that her

impairments did not meet or equal the listing at 11.14, 20 C.F.R.,

Appendix 1, Subpart P, Regulations No. 4 (Pt. 404), for “peripheral

neuropathies.” That listing requires a showing of “[s]ignificant
2

and persistent disorganization of motor function in two

extremities.” The isolated reference by one treating physician to

the need for surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome in “both arms” was

not sufficient to show the severity required by the regulation for

Barnes’s right arm and hand. Barnes failed to sustain her burden

of proof with respect to this step of the Commissioner’s five-step

sequential analysis. See Sullivan v. Zebley, 493 U.S. 521, 531-32

(1993); McQueen v. Apfel, 168 F.3d 152, 154 (5th Cir. 1999).

For the first time on appeal, Barnes conclusionally asserts

that the ALJ failed to address, at the fifth step of sequential

analysis, whether she could maintain “proffered alternative

employment.” We do not ordinarily review issues raised for the

first time on appeal. Chambliss v. Massanari, 269 F.2d 520, 523

(5th Cir. 2001). “In exceptional circumstances, we may, in the

interests of the justice, review an issue that was not raised in

the district court.” Kinash v. Callahan, 129 F.3d 736, 738 n.10

(5th Cir. 1997). Barnes has not established “exceptional

circumstances”; indeed, she has not even countered the alternative

jobs proffered by the vocational expert with proof that she cannot

in fact perform or maintain such jobs. See Boyd v. Apfel, 239 F.3d

698, 705 (5th Cir. 2001).

The decision of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
Case 1:07-cv-03390-SHS-MHD Document 6 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03390-SHS-MHD Document 6 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Joe Bergera, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Iteris, Inc. for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 (this “Report”); and

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report.

 

Date: July 30, 2018

 
|     | /s/ JOE BERGERA                 |
|----------|---------------------------------|
|     | Joe Bergera                     |
| * * | *Chief Executive Officer*       |
| * * | *(Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

----
#### STATE v. WILHELM

No. 668P82.

Case below: 59 N.C. App. 298.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 March 1983.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.09 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### STATE v. LOCKLEAR

No. 111.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 37.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 18 October 1977.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; CNS and Cerebrovascular Aging.                    

*Date:*                         December 12, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging/NIH, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Alessandra M. Bini, PhD, Scientific Review Office, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7708,                         *binia@nia.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 14, 2005.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-22930  Filed 11-18-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09

- 12

- 00563

- CV



### _________________
C ROSSTEX NGL P IPELINE , L.P. , Appellant

V.

R EINS R OAD F ARMS

- 1, L TD

. , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 60 th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. D

- 192,430

________________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM TO CLERK

You are directed to make the following correction in the Opinion dated May

23, 2013:
On page 5, the first full paragraph, the first sentence that reads, “First, we
evaluate Crosstex’s claim that the evidence established that pipeline is a crude
petroleum line .” should be changed to read, “First, we evaluate Crosstex’s claim
that the evidence established that its pipeline is a crude petroleum line.”2 You will give notice of this correction in the original Opinion by sending a
copy of the corrected page accompan ied by this memorandum to all interested
parties who received a copy of the original Opinion.
Entered this the 14th day of October, 2013.

PER CURIAM
Case 1:06-cv-15157-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**FORM 10-Q**

 

**Section 1350Certifications**

 

**Quarterended March 31, 2010**

 

I, Herbert Lindo,Chairman, President and Principal Financial Officer of Kenilworth SystemsCorporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)             the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofthe Company for the third quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)             the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  June 9,2010

 
|   | /s/ Herbert Lindo                                              |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Herbert Lindo                                                  |
|   | Chairman, Chief  Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Case 1:07-cr-00352-PAC     Document 12      Filed 11/28/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cr-00352-PAC     Document 12      Filed 11/28/2007     Page 2 of 2
#### JOHNSON v. BROOKS

No. 113 PC.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 321.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 3 December 1974.
#### IN RE PALMER

No. 15 PC.

No. 115 (Fall Term).

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 220.

Petition by the State for writ of certiorari to the North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 4 October 1978.
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 66-7 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 66-7 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 2 of 2
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Platinum Group Metals
Ltd. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended August 31, 2015, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Frank R. Hallam, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

| | /s/
      Frank R. Hallam           
| | ------------------------------------
| | Frank R. Hallam                     
| | Chief Financial Officer and Director
| | November 24, 2015                   

---
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 20-5 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03258-VM Document 20-5 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 2 of 2
|  | 1. | The      annual report of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2009, as      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the      “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      March 10, 2010 | By:    | /s/      J. Barry Mason                                                 |
|---------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   | J.      Barry MasonPresident      and Chief Executive Officer           |
|                      |   |                                                                    |
| Date:      March 10, 2010 | By:    | /s/      Kitty B. Payne                                                 |
|                      |   | Kitty      B. PayneExecutive      Vice President/Chief FinancialOfficer |

----
Case 1:06-cv-14857-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03365-PAC Document 5 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03365-PAC Document 5 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03365-PAC Document 5 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03365-PAC Document 5 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 4 of 4