alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## 

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

VIDEO INFORMATION

** Details

** Share

# DPAA seeks families’ help for WWII Soldiers lost in Market Garden

By  Ashley M. Wright DPAA Public Affairs

                ARLINGTON, Va.  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

WWIIairborne
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Jackpot's
Consolidated Balance Sheets - June 30, 1999 and 1998 and its Consolidated
Statements of Income - years ended June 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          44,137
<SECURITIES>                                     7,292
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,716
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,274
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            99
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,721
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,403
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,063)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,085)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (978)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   5,581
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,603
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .53


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03359-NRB Document 10 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03359-NRB Document 10 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-15133-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
I-I'ED S'I'ATES L)IS'l'RICT COLlR'I' 

SOU'I'I IERN DIS'I'KICT OF YOKK 

................................................................. --4-.-- ." - 

IN RE: 

i I :06-MI)- I 789 1.1 FK) 

'/'his Dor-zlmrnr Hcllrres 721 ,l li .4c!ions 

........................... .....- -, 

OKIIFR FOR ADhIISSION I'RO HAC \'ICE 

Considering thc Certificate of Ciood Standitg and all other docu~nents rcqi~irrd by Case 

Managemcnt Order h'o. 5 submitled by counscl. 1'1 IS HERtiBY ORDEttELI that: 

Applicant's N,~me: Kobert U. Brock 

Firm Name: Iiushton. Siahely, Johnston & Gim'ctt, P.A. 

Address: Yvst Ot'ficc Box 271, 

C'il~ StatdZip: Monlgornery, Al, 16 101 

Telephonc/F3~: (334) 206-1 1 OU '(3-3 4 ) 48 1-080 1 

is adrnirrcd to praclice pro hac vice as counsel for Mercl. L Co., Inc. in the abovc captioned rase 

in the Unitcd States llisrrict Court for lhe Southern District of New York. 

Uuted: ~arch(Y2008 

Kcu. York. Ncm Yoth 

.! - 

United States District .ludgc. 

Case 1:07-cv-03248-JFK Document 34 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

OFFICE OF THE CLERK 

POST OFFICE BOX 71 1 

MONTGOMERY. ALABAMA 36101-07 1 1 

DEBRA P HACKETT 

CLERK 

TELEPHONE 

13341 954.3600 

CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING 

I, DEBRA P. HACKETT Clerk of the United States Distl-ict Court, Mjddle 

District of A lahama, 

DO HEREBY CERTIFY that Robert Carmichael Brock was duly 

admitted to practice in said Court on October 1, 1984 and is in good standing as 

a member of the bar of said Cnurt. 

Dated at Montgomery, Alabama, on March 4, 2008. 

DEBRA P. HACKETT, 

CLERK 

By: , .- . 

Deputy Clerk 

Case 1:07-cv-03248-JFK Document 34 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 2 of 2
Site Exposure Matrices


Using The Site Exposure Matrices (SEM)
  Case Development and Research
##### 



Exhibit 23.2 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Members
ARTISTdirect Records, LLC: 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-122027, No.
333-53208, No. 333-38104, No. 333-63572 and No. 333-68396) on Forms S-8 of ARTISTdirect, Inc. , of
our report dated April 6, 2004, except for Note 14, which is
March 1, 2005, with respect to the
balance sheet of ARTISTdirect Records, LLC (the Company) as of December 31, 2003, and the related
statements of operations, members deficit and cash flows for the year then ended, which report
appears in the December 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1 of ARTISTdirect, Inc. 
 Our report dated
April 6, 2004, except for Note 14, which is March 1, 2005, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has
incurred substantial operating losses and negative cash flows from operations to date and needs
additional capital to fund its operations, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty. 
 /s/ GUMBINER SAVETT INC. Santa Monica, California
July 26, 2005 
 114
Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 35      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 35      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 2 of 2
#### REA v. CASUALTY CO.

No. 38 PC.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 620.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 11 October 1972.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BEGNOVE VASQUEZ-GARCIA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-73258

Agency No. A089-853-916

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 24, 2016**

Before: REINHARDT, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Begnove Vasquez-Garcia, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal 

from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 31 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 12-73258 

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for 

substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 

1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006), and we deny the petition for review.

Vasquez-Garcia does not challenge the agency’s dispositive determination 

that his asylum application was time-barred. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 

F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a 

party’s opening brief are deemed waived). Thus, we deny his petition for review 

as to his asylum claim, including his humanitarian asylum claim.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that VasquezGarcia’s experiences in El Salvador did not rise to the level of persecution. See 

Gu v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 1014, 1019-21 (9th Cir. 2006); see also Prasad v. INS, 

47 F.3d 336, 340 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Although a reasonable factfinder could have 

found this incident sufficient to establish past persecution, we do not believe that a 

factfinder would be compelled to do so.”) (emphasis in original). Substantial 

evidence also supports the BIA’s determination that Vasquez-Garcia failed to 

demonstrate it is more likely than not that he will be persecuted in El Salvador. 

See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th Cir. 2003) (possibility of future 

persecution too speculative); Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 1179, 1185 (9th Cir. 
 3 12-73258 

2003) (to qualify for withholding of removal, petitioner must show that it is more 

probable than not that he would suffer future persecution). Thus, VasquezGarcia’s withholding of removal claim fails.

Finally, substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s denial of VasquezGarcia’s CAT claim because he failed to show it is more likely than not that he 

will be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of El 

Salvador. See Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir. 2008).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            5180
<SECURITIES>                                         0                     
<RECEIVABLES>                                       22
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  5202
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               53
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        5149
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5202
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   269
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   175
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     94
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 94
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        94
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.23
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 11


11. Statement re computation of per share earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                 First quarter ended     First quarter ended
                                                  December 31, 2001       December 31, 2000
                                                  -----------------       -----------------
<S>                                                     <C>                     <C>
Net income (loss) in thousands                          $   (1,634)             $     6,901


Weighted average shares outstanding                      15,624,502              15,574,631

Assumed exercise of stock options,
  weighted average of incremental shares                         --                 908,897

Assumed purchase of stock under stock
  purchase plan, weighted average                                --                  87,181
                                                         ----------              ----------

Diluted shares - adjusted weighted-average
  shares and assumed conversions                         15,624,502              16,570,709
                                                         ==========              ==========


Basic earnings (loss) per share                         $    (0.10)             $      0.44

Diluted earnings (loss) per share                       $    (0.10)             $      0.42

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. STALEY

No. 111 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 730.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 14 July 1976.
Case 1:07-cv-03427-NRB Document 16-2 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03427-NRB Document 16-2 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03427-NRB Document 16-2 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03427-NRB Document 16-2 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 3 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 4 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 5 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 6 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 7 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 8 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 9 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 10 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 11 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 12 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 13 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 14 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 15 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 16 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 17 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 18 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 1 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 19 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 11-2 Filed 08/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 11-2 Filed 08/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 1 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 2 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 3 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 4 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 5 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 6 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 7 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 8 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 9 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 10 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 11 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 12 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 13 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 14 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 15 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 16 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 17 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 18 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 19 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 20 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 21 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 22 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 23 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 24 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 25 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 26 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 27 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 28 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 29 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 30 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 31 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 32 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 33 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 34 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-11 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 35 of 35
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Rule13a-15(e)/15d-15(e)**

 

**I, Russell A. Whitney, the Chief Executive Officer of WhitneyInformation Network, Inc. (the “Company”), certify that:**

 

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K of the Company;

 

2.            Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.            Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

 

Dated:  June 2, 2004

 

 
|   | /s/Russell  A. Whitney          |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  Russell A. Whitney       |
|   | Title: Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
#### STATE v. CHURCH

No. 43 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 58.

Petition for defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 November 1977. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 1 November 1977.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14**

**OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Nicholas J. Malino, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this yearly report on Form 10-KSB of Amerex Group, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this yearly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this yearly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this yearly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this yearly report; 

 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and: 

 

(a) I am in the process of designing such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this yearly report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this yearly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

(c) presented in this yearly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and 

 

6. I have indicated in this yearly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

 

Date: May 17, 2007
#### LOUISE PHILLIPS v. HARRIE PARTON

No. 652A82

(Filed 8 March 1983)

Appeal by defendant pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-39(2) from the decision of the Court of Appeals *(Judges Hill*and *Hedrick*concurring, *Judge*(now Chief Judge) *Vaughn*dissenting), reported in 59 N.C. App. 179, 296 S.E. 2d 317 (1982), which affirmed the judgment entered by *Sitton, Judge,*at the 15 June 1981 Session of JACKSON Superior Court.

*Holt, Havre & Bridgers, by Ben Oshel Bridgers, for plaintiff appellee.*

*Herbert L. Hyde and G. Edison Hill for defendant appellant.*

*695PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.