alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### HOMER M. SHARPE, Administrator of the Estate of Brenda Adeline Sharpe v. DR. V. WATSON PUGH

No. 26

(Filed 26 November 1974)

Appeal and Error § 46 — Court evenly divided — judgment affirmed — no precedent

Where the Court was equally divided on the question presented and one Justice did not participate in the hearing or disposition of the case, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed without becoming a precedent.

Chief Justice Bobbitt not sitting.

The plaintiff, administrator of his infant daughter’s estate, instituted his civil action in the superior court against the defendant, her attending physician, alleging her death was proximately caused by the defendant’s negligence in administering Chloromycetin as treatment for tonsillitis when he knew, or should have known, the use of this powerful drug is often attended by dangerous side effects, including aplastic anemia, and that such use is not recommended by the manufacturer as treatment for intestate’s ailments; notwithstanding such knowledge, defendant administered the drug' without explaining the danger to the infant’s parents and that thereafter aplastic anemia developed from the use of the drug and caused intestate’s death.

The defendant, by answer, admitted the relationship of physician and patient and that he administered Chloromycetin without notifying the parents of his infant patient of the danger incident to the use of the drug. He denied all other material allegation of the complaint.

At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, which included the defendant’s adverse examination, Judge Bone sustained defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and entered judgment dismissing the action.

On plaintiff’s appeal, the North Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the superior court. (21 N.C. App. 110, 203 S.E. 2d 330.) On plaintiff’s application, this Court granted certiorari.

*210*Boyce, Mitchell, Bums & Smith by F. Kent Burns and Eugene Boyce for plaintiff appellant.*

*Maupin, Taylor & Ellis by W. W. Taylor, Jr. and Richard C. Titus; Manning, Fulton •& Skinner by Howard E. Manning for defendant appellee.*

Per Curiam

Chief Justice Bobbitt did not participate in the hearing or disposition of this case. The six members of the Court who heard the appeal were equally divided on the question whether the decision of the Court of Appeals should be affirmed or reversed. This equal division requires that the decision of the Court of Appeals be affirmed without becoming a precedent. *Parrish v. Piedmont Publishing Co.,*271 N.C. 711, 157 S.E. 2d 334; *James v. Rogers,*231 N.C. 668, 58 S.E. 2d 640; *Gardner v. McDonald,*223 N.C. 854, 25 S.E. 2d 397; *Smith v. McDowell Furniture Co.,*221 N.C. 536, 19 S.E. 2d 17.

Affirmed.

Chief Justice Bobbitt not sitting.
#### STATE v. BLACKMON

No. 140 PC.

Case below: 38 N.C. App. 620.

Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 January 1979.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       UT
<CIK> 0000055387
<NAME> KENTUCKY UTILITIES COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                    PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                         1,471,566
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          13,123
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                              154,231
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             55,034
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1,693,954
<COMMON>                                            307,545 <F1>
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                 0 <F2>
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                 287,462
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                      595,007
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                          40,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                546,330
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                        0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                            0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                            21
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                 0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                               0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                          0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                      512,596
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                     1,693,954
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                           376,298
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                 24,741
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                          288,420
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                          313,161
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                              63,137
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  (19,881)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                       43,256
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             19,326
<NET-INCOME>                                         23,930
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           1,128
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                        22,802
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             40,090
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            18,654
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                               90,862
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
<FN>
<F1>Includes common stock expense of $595.
<F2>Represents unrealized loss on marketable securities,
    net of taxes.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 70848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23178]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as a 
Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean 
Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR part 515).
    Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should 
not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, 
DC 20573.

Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation Intermediary 
Applicants

Maxfreight International Logistics, Inc., 708 S. Hindry Avenue, 
Inglewood, CA 90301, Officers: David Yasuo Miyamoto, CEO (Qualifying 
Individual), Barry Chiang, Director
Five Continent Line, L.L.C., 2065 S. Escondido Blvd., <greek-i>101, 
Escondido, CA 92025, Officer: Alycia Cerini, Managing Member 
(Qualifying Individual)
Logical Solution Services, Inc. dba Cruz World Shipping, 317 Brick 
Blvd., Brick, NJ 08723, Officers: Victor Cruz, President (Qualifying 
Individual)

Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder 
Transportation Intermediary Applicant

International Trade Management Group, LLC, 611 Live Oak Drive, McLean, 
VA 22101, Officers: Lahyan Diab, Member, Isahm Diab, Member

Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicant

World Wide International, Inc., 5900 Roche Drive, Suite LL 20, 
Columbus, OH 43229, Officers: Carolyn Sue Logan, President (Qualifying 
Individual), Melvin C. Logan, Vice President.

    Dated: November 18, 2005.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-23178 Filed 11-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Case 1:07-cv-03413-LAP Document 15 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03413-LAP Document 15 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03384-JCF Document 3 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03384-JCF Document 3 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03366-GEL Document 5-2 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03366-GEL Document 5-2 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03366-GEL Document 5-2 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03366-GEL Document 5-2 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03366-GEL Document 5-2 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03366-GEL Document 5-2 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 6 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-14863-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14863-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14863-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14863-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14863-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14863-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14863-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14863-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14863-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14863-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14863-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14863-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14863-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15077-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15077-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15077-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15077-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15077-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15077-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15077-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15077-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15077-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15077-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15077-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15077-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15077-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 2 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER 

SITE LITIGATION 

21MC102(AKH)

KRZYSZTOF SZCZEPANSKI (AND WIFE, ANNA 

SZCZEPANSKI), 

Plaintiff(s), 

-against100 CHURCH LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

06CV15084(AKH)

NOTICE OF ADOPTION BY 

100 CHURCH LLC OF 

AMENDED ANSWER TO 

MASTER COMPLAINT

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant 100 CHURCH LLC (hereinafter “100 

Church”), as and for its response to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption 

(Check-Off Complaint) related to the Master Complaint adding new defendants not previously 

served filed in the above-referenced action, herein adopts 100 Church's Amended Answer to 

Master Complaint dated August 30, 2007, which was filed in the matter of In re World Trade 

Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). 100 CHURCH has filed 

a Master Disclosure of Interested Parties in 21 MC 102 (AKH), and as such, is exempt from 

having to file such a disclosure in this specific matter, pursuant to the provisions of Case 

Management Order No. 4 (¶ J(2)). 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT defendant, 100 CHURCH reserves its 

right to assert any defenses to which it is entitled, including but not limited to those enumerated 

in Case Management Order No. 4 (¶¶ D(1)-(5)). 

Case 1:06-cv-15084-AKH Document 8 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 1 of 3
WHEREFORE, 100 Church demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned action 

as against it, together with its costs and disbursements. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 December 4, 2007 

HARRIS BEACH PLLC 

Attorneys for Defendant 

100 CHURCH LLC 

 /s/ 

 Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062) 

100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor 

New York, New York 10005 

(212) 687-0100 

TO: 

Paul Napoli, Esq. 

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP 

115 Broadway, 12th Floor 

New York, New York 10006 

Robert A. Grochow, Esq. 

Robert A. Grochow, P.C. 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq. 

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiff

James E. Tyrrell, Esq. 

Joseph Hopkins, Esq. 

Patton Boggs LLP 

One Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

Thomas Egan, Esq. 

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP 

One Liberty Plaza 

New York, New York 10006 

Liaison Counsel for the Defendants 

All Counsel via ECF 

Case 1:06-cv-15084-AKH Document 8 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATION AS TO SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on December 4, 2007, I caused to be filed and 

served the following document electronically via the Court’s ECF system upon the parties: 

1. Notice of 100 Church LLC's Adoption of Amended Answer to Master 

Complaint. 

Dated: December 4, 2007 

 /s/ 

 Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG 7062)

Case 1:06-cv-15084-AKH Document 8 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER 

SITE LITIGATION 

21MC102(AKH) 

KRZYSZTOF SZCZEPANSKI (AND WIFE, ANNA 

SZCZEPANSKI), 

Plaintiff(s), 

-against100 CHURCH LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

06CV15084(AKH) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby enters an appearance as counsel 

for Defendants 100 CHURCH LLC and ZAR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. n/k/a 

SAPIR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. in the above-captioned action and all future 

correspondence and papers filed or serviced in connection with the above-captioned action are to 

be directed to the undersigned. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 November 30, 2007 

Yours etc., 

HARRIS BEACH PLLC 

Attorneys for Defendant 

100 CHURCH LLC and ZAR REALTY 

MANAGEMENT CORP. n/k/a SAPIR 

REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP.

____________/s/________________

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG-7062) 

100 Wall Street 

New York, NY 10005 

212 687-0100 

212 687-0659 (Fax) 

Case 1:06-cv-15084-AKH Document 7 Filed 11/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on November 30, 2007, I caused the following document 

to be electronically via the Court’s ECF system: 

1. Notice of Appearance (of Defendants 100 Church LLC and Zar Realty 

Management Corp. n/k/a Sapir Realty Management Corp.). 

The undersigned further certifies that on November 30, 2007, I caused the aforesaid 

documents to be served via First Class Mail upon the following: 

Paul Napoli, Esq. 

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP 

115 Broadway, 12th Floor 

New York, New York 10006 

Robert A. Grochow, Esq. 

Robert A. Grochow, P.C. 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq. 

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs 

James E. Tyrrell, Esq. 

Joseph Hopkins, Esq. 

Patton Boggs LLP 

1 Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

Thomas Egan, Esq. 

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP 

One Liberty Plaza 

New York, New York 10006 

Liaison Counsel for the Defendants 

Dated: November 30, 2007 

 ___________/s/_______________

 Stanley Goos

Case 1:06-cv-15084-AKH Document 7 Filed 11/30/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### DARSIE v. DUKE UNIVERSITY

No. 23 PC

Case below: 48 N.C. App. 20

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 November 1980.
#### BROWN v. VICK

No. 134 PC.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 404.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 7 January 1975.
1 The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United St ates District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-1532

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Robert Francis, also known as Pete, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 7, 2007 Filed: June 15, 2007

___________ Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Robert Francis appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his motion for return of a Charles Schwab Brokerage acc ount containing $15,650.95. Francis asserted that his due process rights were violated because he did not receive actual notice of the forfeiture proceeding. We have carefully revi ewed the record, see Lobzun v. United States , 422 F.3d 503, 507 (7th Cir. 2005) (de novo standard of review), and we agree with the district-2- court that Francis was provided constituti onally adequate notice of the forfeiture proceeding, seeDusenbery v. United States , 534 U.S. 161, 168-70 (2002) (due process requires notice “reasonably calculated” to apprise interested parties of pendency of forfeiture action). In January 2001, while Francis was a fugitive, written notice of the intent to forfeit was sent to several addresses believed to be his and was published for three successive weeks in the New York Times. See Madewell v. Downs , 68 F.3d 1030, 1046-47 (8th Cir. 1995) (government’s e ndeavors to provide claimant, who was not in federal custody, with notice by sendi ng written notice to claimant’s last known address, and publishing notice in newspaper of general circulation, was reasonably calculated, under the circumstances, to ach ieve result required by due process). We reject Francis’s arguments that no tice should have been published in a local newspaper, see United States v. Robinson , 434 F.3d 357, 367-68 (5th Cir. 2005) (although local newspaper would have been more likely to provide claimant notice, government’s publication in New York Times comported with due process requirements), and that the government s hould have provided him notice in March 2001, after he was taken into custody: the government had already provided him constitutionally adequate no tice in January 2001, see Madewell , 68 F.3d at 1046 (adequacy of notice is measured at time it was sent). Accordingly, we affirm the judgmen t of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Movants' Purchases and Losses 

Shares Share Total Shares Share 

Name Date Purchased Price Cost Date Sold Price 

Spitz, John 11/16/2006 1,000 $14.75 $14,750.00 held 1,000 $7.61 Spitz, John 1,000 $14,750.00 1,000 Brickman Investments Inc. 11/17/2006 1,000 $14.18 $14,178.00 01/26/2007 1,000 $9.77 Brickman Investments Inc. 1,000 $14,178.00 1,000 Movants' Total 2,000 $28,928.00 2,000 *For shares held at the end of the class period, damages are calculatedby multiplying the shares held by the average share price during the 90calendar days after the end of the class period. The price used is $7.61as of May 01, 2007.

Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 15-3 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Strategic Internet
Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report"). I, Abbas Salih, Chief Executive Officer of the company,
certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





|Date: | August 12, 2009 |  | /s/ Abbas Salih            
|----- | --------------- |  | ---------------------------
|      |                 |  | Abbas .Salih, CEO, Director

---
Case 1:06-cv-15105-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03251-JSR     Document 10      Filed 06/26/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03251-JSR     Document 10      Filed 06/26/2007     Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1646 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1646

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the community-based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
 Veterans Affairs in St. Augustine, Florida, as the ``Leo C. Chase Jr. 
                Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF LEO C. CHASE JR. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS CLINIC.

    (a) Designation.--The community-based outpatient clinic of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs located at 207 Stratton Road, St. 
Augustine, Florida, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act 
be known and designated as the ``Leo C. Chase Jr. Department of 
Veterans Affairs Clinic'' or the ``Leo C. Chase Jr. VA Clinic''.
    (b) Reference.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference to 
the Leo C. Chase Jr. Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic.

            Passed the Senate September 17, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1646

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the community-based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
 Veterans Affairs in St. Augustine, Florida, as the ``Leo C. Chase Jr. 
                Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic''.
```