alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered July 2, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 00404
- CV ROBERT T. O'DONNELL, Appellant
V. JULIA L. VARGO, Appellee On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Ca use No. DF
- 86
- 15027 

### O RDER
T he clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated May 7, 2014, we notified the Dallas County District Clerk that the clerk’s record was overdue and directed the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s recor d within thirty days. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed and we have not received any correspondence from the Dallas County District Clerk’s office regarding the status of the clerk’s record. Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Cl erk to file the clerk’s record within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, toGary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              SEP-3-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                           6,451
<SECURITIES>                                    27,541
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,305
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (9,881)
<INVENTORY>                                    136,303
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               251,159
<PP&E>                                         155,699
<DEPRECIATION>                                  82,128
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 373,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          188,051
<BONDS>                                         75,617
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,809
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,897
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   373,360
<SALES>                                      1,948,919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,948,919
<CGS>                                        1,770,339
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,919,417
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (366)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,262
<INCOME-TAX>                                       745
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,517
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,517
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### ZAHREN v. MAYTAG CO.

No. 7 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 143.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 29 August 1978.
Case 1:07-cv-03250-JGK Document 4 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03250-JGK Document 4 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03250-JGK Document 4 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03250-JGK Document 4 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03250-JGK Document 4 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03250-JGK Document 4 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03250-JGK Document 4 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03250-JGK Document 4 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03250-JGK Document 4 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 9 of 9
Exhibit 23

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference  of our report  included  in this Form 10-K,  into the Riggs  National
Corporation's previously filed registration statements, listed as follows:


         Form                                 Registration Statement Number
         ----                                 -----------------------------

         S-8                                  333-76281
         S-8                                  333-50185
         S-8                                  333-50181
         S-3                                  333-26447, 333-26447-01
         S-3                                  333-21297, 333-21297-01
         S-8                                  333-14609
         S-8                                  33-56485
         S-8                                  33-52451
         S-8                                  33-51711



/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Vienna, VA
March 23, 2001
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Digital Impact, Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), William
Park, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                    /s/ William Park
                                    -----------------------
                                    William Park
                                    Chief Executive Officer

                                    June 12, 2003
#### WRIGHT v. AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INS. CO.

No. 19P83.

Case below: 59 N.C. App. 591.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 February 1983.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET/INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          14,421
<SECURITIES>                                     5,965
<RECEIVABLES>                                  192,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               223,829
<PP&E>                                          49,721
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,876
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 334,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,797
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,690
<OTHER-SE>                                     263,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   334,627
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               209,162
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  176,664
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   131
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  49
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,473
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,393
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,080
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. SPRINKLE

No. 254 PC.

Case below: 46 N.C. App. 802.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 15 July 1980.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995             JAN-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995             JAN-01-1994
<CASH>                                           7,529                  12,348
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,290                  34,746
<ALLOWANCES>                                       201                     224
<INVENTORY>                                        554                     643
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,746                  48,612
<PP&E>                                         449,979                 377,714
<DEPRECIATION>                                 149,313                 116,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 340,412                 310,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,060                  46,146
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           251                     247
<OTHER-SE>                                     191,577                 187,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   340,412                 310,952
<SALES>                                        125,550                 106,908
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               128,016                 109,458
<CGS>                                           95,616                  78,173
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,616                  78,173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,175                  13,906
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,631                     942
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (406)                  16,437
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,834                   5,138
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,240)                  11,299
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,240)                  11,299
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)                     .46
        

</TABLE>
#### HUFFMAN v. INSURANCE CO.

No. 24 PC.

Case below: 17 N.C. App. 292.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 April 1973.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert N. Weingarten, Chief Financial Officer of ARTISTdirect, Inc., certify
that: 1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of ARTISTdirect, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the Evaluation Date); and c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date; 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and 6. The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: May 21, 2004 /s/ Robert N. WeingartenRobert N. WeingartenChief Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 9-7 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 9-7 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted),  Robert L. Walker,  Chief Executive  Officer of International  Leisure
Hosts,  Ltd.  (the  "Company"),  hereby  certifies  that,  to  the  best  of his
knowledge:

1.       The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June
         30, 2003, to which this  Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the
         "Quarterly  Report"),  fully complies with the  requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.       The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,  in
         all  material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
         operations  of the  Company  at the end of the  period  covered  by the
         Quarterly  Report and  results of  operations  of the  Company  for the
         period covered by the Quarterly Report.


/s/ Robert L. Walker

Robert L. Walker
Chief Executive Officer
August 4, 2003














                                  Page 16 of 19
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated June 28,2006 relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements andfinancial statement schedule appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Iteris, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2006 in the previouslyfiled Registration Statement of Iteris, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-121942)and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-126834, 333-75728, 333-05735,333-44907 and 333-30396).
| /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP |   |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Irvine, California                   |   |   |
| June 29, 2006                   |   |   |

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-03365-PAC Document 5-5 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ DORI CONTRERAS GARZA GINA M. BENAVIDES GREGORY T. PERKES NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE 901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR CORPUS C HRISTI, TEXAS 78401 361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL) 361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BLDG. 100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9 956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL) 956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

April 02, 2015

Hon. Charles Walker Bailey 1108 Lavaca St Ste 700 Austin, TX 78701

- 2180

Hon. Dolores A. Hibbs 1700 N. Congress 11th Floor Austin, TX 78701 * DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Hon. Cynthia Woelk Assistant Attorney General Environmental P rotection Division MC 066 P. O. Box 12548 Austin, TX 78711

- 2548 * DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL * Hon. Priscilla M. Hubenak Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Division

- MC 066 P. O. Box 12548 Austin, TX 78711

- 2548 * DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Hon. Do uglas G. Caroom Bickerstaff, Heath, Delgado, Acosta, LLP 3711 S. Mopac, Bldg. 1, Ste. 300 Austin, TX 78746 * DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 13

- 00415

- CV Tr.Ct.No. D

- 1

- GN

- 12

- 003937 Style: TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY v. TEXAS FARM

BU REAU, FRANK VOLLEMAN, FRANK DESTEFANO, DAVID AND MARY BALLEW, RON AND SHERIE BURNETTE, SAM JONES, THEODORE AND MARY KALLUS, GLEN MARECEK, JOHN GAULDING, AND CHARLES AND KATHERINE HARLESS

Enclosed please find the opinion and judgment issued by the Court o n this date.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER: ch Enc.

cc: 53 rd District Court Hon. Amalia Rodriguez

- Mendoza , Travis County District Clerk (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL) Hon. Billy Ray Stubblefield , Presi ding Judge, Third A d ministrative Judicial Region (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)
#### STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. 114 PC.

Case below: 38 N.C. App. 138.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 28 November 1978.
EXHIBIT 99.1

             Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
              Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Alan C. Bashforth, the Chief Executive Officer of Science Dynamics
Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
    year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.



Dated: April 14, 2003



                                    /s/ Alan C. Bashforth
                                    ---------------------
                                    Name: Alan C. Bashforth
                                    Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### ROBBINS v. BOWMAN

No. 31 PC.

Case below: 9 N.C. App. 416

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 3 November 1970.
April 19, 2012



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JOHN FRANGIAS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 10

- 01090

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED , that the appellant pay all costs expended in this

app eal, and that this decision be certified below for observance.
Order entered March 8, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00784-CV

TONYA PARKS AND PARKS REALTY FIRM, LLC, Appellants

V.

AFFILIATED BANK, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-04540-C

ORDER

The Court abated this appeal on December 20, 2017, so that the trial court could make 

findings relating to whether Tonya Parks, individually and on behalf of Parks Realty Firm, LLC 

(PRF), voluntarily entered into an agreement under rule of civil procedure 11, pursuant to which 

Parks and PRF forfeited their right to bring this appeal, and whether any agreement is 

enforceable. The trial court held a hearing on February 16, 2018, and entered findings of fact 

and conclusions of law on February 27, 2018. Following the hearing, Parks and PRF requested 

the opportunity to brief and argue issues relating to (1) the trial court’s rulings on objections 

made during the February 16, 2018 hearing, and findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (2) 

this Court’s orders of December 20, 2017, and February 18, 2018, relating to the abatement of

this appeal.
We REINSTATE this appeal. We GRANT, in part, Parks and PRF’s request for 

additional briefing. By March 23, 2018, Parks and PRF may file a brief, not exceeding fifteen 

pages, raising only issues relating to the trial court’s rulings on objections at the February 16, 

2018 hearing and the trial court’s February 27, 2018 findings of fact and conclusions of law. 

Affiliated Bank may file any response, not exceeding fifteen pages, by April 9, 2018. Parks and 

PRF may file any reply, not exceeding five pages, by April 16, 2018. No extensions to these 

deadlines will be entertained. Oral argument on the supplemental issues will not be permitted.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
#### STATE v. FORNEY

No. 150 PC.

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 388.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 14 July 1978.
**Exhibit 31.01**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Charles M. Peck,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K/Aof Whitney Information Networks, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report.

 

 
| /s/ Charles M. Peck         |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
|                        |   |
| Charles  M. Peck            |   |
| ** **                  |   |
| **Chief Executive Officer** |   |

 

Dated:  May 29, 2009

 

----
#### IN RE ASHLEY

No. 108 PC.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 176.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 3 December 1974.