alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-148326 and 333-51468) and Form F-3 (No. 333-101502) of Workstream Inc. of our report dated September 14, 2009, relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Workstream Inc. for
the year ended May 31, 2009.  Our report dated September 14, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2009 included an emphasis paragraph relating to an uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
 
 /s/ Cross, Fernandez & Riley, LLP
 Orlando, Florida
 September 14, 2009
#### HARRIS v. HARRIS

No. 34PC

Case below: 50 NC App 305

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 April 1981. Motion of plaintiff to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 7 April 1981.
Case 1:06-cv-14848-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14848-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14848-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14848-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14848-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14848-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14848-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14848-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14848-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14848-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14848-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14848-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14848-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15031-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. WEBB

No. 139 PC.

Case below: 38 N.C. App. 628.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 January 1979.
Case 1:06-cv-15020-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15020-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15020-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15020-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15020-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15020-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15020-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15020-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15020-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15020-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15020-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15020-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15020-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS Oklahoma Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Hiskett, D.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
exhibit4-2.htm




Exhibit 4.2

 





 

FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

 

RIGHTS AGREEMENT

 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), dated as of August 20, 2009, is between CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and COMPUTERSHARE
TRUST COMPANY, N.A., a federally chartered trust company (the “Rights Agent”).

 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Rights Agent entered into the Rights Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2007 (the “Rights Plan”);

 

WHEREAS, Section 27 of the Rights Agreement permits the amendment of the Rights Agreement by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”); and

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution duly adopted on August 19, 2009, the Board has determined that it is desirable and in the best interest of the Company to amend the Rights Agreement as set forth below.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

 

1. AMENDMENT OF SECTION 7(a)(i).  Section 7(a)(i) of the Rights Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

 

(i) the Close of business on August 31, 2009 (the “Final Expiration Date”), or

 

2. EFFECTIVENESS.  This Amendment shall be effective as of the date hereof, and all references to the Rights Agreement shall, from and after such time, be deemed to be references to the Rights Agreement as amended hereby.

 

3. GOVERNING LAW.  This Amendment shall be deemed to be a contract made under the laws of the State of Delaware and for all purposes shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of such State applicable to
contracts made and to be performed entirely within such State.

 

4. COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and each of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original, and all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument.

 

5. SEVERABILITY.  If any term, provision, covenant or restriction of this Amendment is held by a court of competent jurisdiction or other authority to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the terms, provisions,
covenants and restrictions of this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated.

 

6. DEFINED TERMS.  Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meaning given such terms in the Rights Agreement.

 

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

 






 


  



  







  





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date and year first above written.

 





 


	  	
CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

	  	  
	  	
By:                                                                                        

	  	
 Name:       

	  	
 Title:    













	  	
COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY, N.A.

	  	  
	  	
By:                                                                                           

	  	
 Name:     

	  	
 Title:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7177

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

MARY LOUISE FORNEY, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Lacy H. Thornburg, 

District Judge. (1:97-cr-00310-LHT-10) 

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 22, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Claire J. Rauscher, Federal Defender, Charlotte, North Carolina; 

Matthew Segal, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Asheville, 

North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Mary Louise Forney appeals the district court’s order 

denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Forney, No. 1:97-cr-00310-LHT-10 (W.D.N.C. June 26, 2008). We 

deny Forney’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10


Exhibit 10.1       




INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY

Summary of Named Executive Officer and Director Compensation Arrangements

Exhibit to Form 10Q for period ended June 30, 2009




Executive Officers

In addition to the annual base salaries noted in the table below, compensation arrangements for our executive officers include benefits paid under any applicable employment contracts, other IGT Plans for Management Bonus (including Cash Sharing), Stock Incentives, Profit Sharing, and Deferred Compensation as more fully described in exhibits to our annual report on Form 10-K or interim quarterly Form 10-Q filed with the SEC.  These individuals also receive certain perquisites as explained in our annual proxy statement.  Except for employment contracts that are on file with the SEC, these are at-will employment arrangements.




						
	Name

	 
	Title

	 
	Base

Salary (1)


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Patti S. Hart

	 
	President, Chief Executive Officer

	 
	$

	800,000


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Thomas J. Matthews

	 
	Chairman of the Board

	 
	$

	840,000


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Patrick Cavanaugh

	 
	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

	 
	$

	300,000


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	David D. Johnson

	 
	Executive Vice President, General Counsel

	 
	$

	525,000







(1) Amounts reported in our proxy statement may vary depending on the timing of pay period during the fiscal year




Directors

Annual Retainer 

a

$65,000 paid in quarterly installments

a

Prior to the beginning of each fiscal year, members may elect to receive all or a part of the total retainer in the form of a restricted stock award




Board and Committee Meeting Fees

a

Board - $1,500 per meeting attended after 8 meetings have been held and attended

a

Audit - $1,500 per meeting attended after 10 meetings have been held and attended

a

Compensation, Nominating & Corporate Governance, and Compliance - $1,500 per meeting attended after 4 meetings have been held.  Special Committee - $1,500 for each in-person meeting plus travel expenses.




Additional Annual Retainer for Board Committee Members (payable in quarterly installments)

a

Lead Independent Director - $70,000 cash and an additional grant of restricted shares having a grant-date value of $30,000

a

Chair:  Audit - $35,000; Compensation, Nominating & Corporate Governance, and Compliance - $20,000

a

Member: Audit - $17,500; Compensation, Nominating & Corporate Governance, Compliance, Special Committee - $10,000




Equity Grants 

a

Upon election to the board:  20,000 stock options and 5,000 restricted shares vesting ratably over 3 years

a

Annual grant:  11,000 stock options and 2,750 shares restricted shares with 1-year vesting
Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 4 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 4 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 4 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 7:07-cv-03368-SCR Document 4 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 4 of 4
#### STATE v. ELAM

No. 86.

Case below: 19 N.C. App. 451.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 November 1973. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal allowed 1 November 1973.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

IN THE MATTER OF 

ERNEST PAUL FRANCIS 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 2284 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 

Board File No. C1-16-466 

(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, No. 

15-BG-293) 

Attorney Registration No. 41031

(Out of State) 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

 AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2016, upon consideration of the responses 

to a Notice and Order directing Respondent to provide reasons against the imposition of 

reciprocal discipline, Ernest Paul Francis is suspended from the practice of law for a 

period of thirty days, the suspension is stayed in favor of a six-month probation, 

consistent with the Order of the District of Columbia dated April 28, 2016.
Case 1:07-cr-00367-HB Document 2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cr-00367-HB Document 2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cr-00367-HB Document 2 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 3 of 3
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Excel Medical &amp; Diagnostic, P.C., as Assignee of Jyotsna Patel, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Park Ins. Co., Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Gullo &amp; Associates, LLP (Cristina Carollo of counsel), for appellant.Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Joseph Padrucco of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Harriet L. Thompson, J.), entered November 4, 2016. The order, insofar as appealed from and as limited by the brief, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based upon plaintiff's assignor's failure to appear for duly scheduled independent medical examinations (IMEs). The Civil Court denied defendant's motion but, in effect pursuant to CPLR 3212 (g), limited the issue for trial to whether plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for the scheduled IMEs.</p><p>In support of its motion, defendant submitted an affirmation from the doctor who was to perform the IMEs, which affirmation was sufficient to establish that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for the scheduled IMEs (<i>see Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.</i>, 35 AD3d 720 [2006]). In view of the foregoing, and as plaintiff has not challenged the Civil Court's finding, in effect, that defendant is otherwise entitled to judgment, the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur. </p><br><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: June 14, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert N. Weingarten, Chief Financial Officer of ARTISTdirect, Inc., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
of ARTISTdirect, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal controls; and Date:  May 13, 2005
    By:
    /s/ ROBERT N. WEINGARTENRobert N. WeingartenChief Financial Officer 114
Case 7:07-cv-03336-SCR Document 9 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 7:07-cv-03336-SCR Document 9 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 7:07-cv-03336-SCR Document 9 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 3 of 3
STAND 

TOGETHER

Join your brothers and sisters in a 

groundbreaking effort to understand and 

reduce cancer. Together, we can have a 

lasting impact on the fire service. 

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2023-108 (revised 06/2023)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB2023108revised062023

June 2023

JOIN THE NATIONAL FIREFIGHTER 

REGISTRY FOR CANCER

NFR.CDC.GOV
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 24 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 24 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 24 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 24 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 24 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 24 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 6 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-15050-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### CENTRAL SYSTEMS v. HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING CO.

No. 6 PC

Case below 48 N.C. App. 198

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 November 1980.
#### STATE v. HEBERT

No. 199 PC.

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 783.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 29 August 1978.
EXHIBIT 11.1


                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE



First Ecom.com
Year ended December 31, 2000
Computation of loss per share



Date                     Shares issued       No of days        Weighted average
                                             outstanding       No. of shares


1-Jan-00                   14,956,667            366              14,956,667
6-Mar-00                    3,228,500            301               2,655,133
31-Mar-00                      24,870            276                  18,754
26-Jul-00                   1,000,000            159                 434,426

Total (Basic)              19,210,037                             18,064,980

Loss for the year                                              $  17,809,461

Loss per share- basic                                          $        0.98
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC
FORM 10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,367,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,478,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    42,000
<INVENTORY>                                  6,001,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,127,000
<PP&E>                                       6,798,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,913,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,979,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,024,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,592,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,979,000
<SALES>                                     13,819,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,819,000
<CGS>                                       12,918,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,101,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,183,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (265,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (108,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (157,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (157,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-15136-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1