alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0                  28,933
<SECURITIES>                                         0                   2,189
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                 200,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                 248,903
<PP&E>                                               0                  96,160
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                   7,024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 480,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                  88,995
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                   7,245
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                 382,259
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 480,625
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               219,671                 657,678
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  207,252                 626,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   236                     689
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,884                  36,549
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,624                  14,803
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,260                  21,746
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .12                     .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12                     .31


</TABLE>
Case 7:07-cv-03232-CS-LMS     Document 24      Filed 08/05/2008     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cr-00363-PKC Document 9 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:07-cr-00363-PKC Document 9 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:07-cr-00363-PKC Document 9 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:07-cr-00363-PKC Document 9 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:07-cr-00363-PKC Document 9 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:07-cr-00363-PKC Document 9 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:07-cr-00363-PKC Document 9 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:07-cr-00363-PKC Document 9 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:07-cr-00363-PKC Document 9 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:07-cr-00363-PKC Document 9 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:07-cr-00363-PKC Document 9 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:07-cr-00363-PKC Document 9 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:07-cr-00363-PKC Document 9 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 13 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 7 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 7 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 7 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 7 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-03410-CLB Document 2 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-14857-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14857-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14857-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14857-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14857-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14857-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14857-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14857-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14857-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14857-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14857-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14857-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14857-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          38,117
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,667
<PP&E>                                      21,419,260
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,321,927
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,857
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        434
<COMMON>                                         7,212
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,912,808
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,321,927
<SALES>                                      1,850,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,950,428
<CGS>                                        1,213,415
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,444,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            505,816
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   505,816
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .105
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .105


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Terry Smith v. The State of Texas

Appellate case numbers: 01-12-00661-CR, 01-12-00662-CR, 01-12-00663-CR

Trial court case number: 10DCR055807A (Counts I, II, III)

Trial court: 400th District Court of Fort Bend County

Appellant’s motion for en banc reconsideration is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

 Acting for the Court

En Banc Court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, 

Sharp, Massengale, Brown, and Huddle.

Date: April 10, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                                5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the contained quarterly 10-Q and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                             1

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               Jul-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                                  Aug-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                    Apr-30-1999
<CASH>                                                            1,989,511
<S>
<SECURITIES>                                                        139,447
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       252,911
<ALLOWANCES>                                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                          0
<PP&E>                                                           50,769,435
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   22,361,703
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   41,783,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             2,110,798
<BONDS>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                          2,178,297
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                                       28,678,540
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     41,783,360
<SALES>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  7,971,401
<CGS>                                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  6,358,997
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  517,963
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   1,299,496
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        475,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 824,496
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        824,496
<EPS-BASIC>                                                          0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          0.00


</TABLE>
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 18 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 18 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 18 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 18 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 18 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 5 of 5
#### DEW v. SHOCKLEY

No. 128 PC.

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 87.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 14 July 1978.
. . .

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF 'MCAB **AUSTIN** .~~ WPP ,

Honorable U. P..Sexton county Attorney Orange, Texas
Dear Sir: opinion NO. 0-372s Re: Whether oounty treasurer is entitled&o reoeive oommissionfor the oolleotionand disbursementof Road District Funds in addition to the maximum compensationof $2,000~.00

per year. In your letter 0r June 29, 1941, you request our opinion in response to the following question8

"Is the County Treasurer of a county having a populationof 15,545, aooording to the last Federal Census and a valuation of $12,183,570.00,according to the last approved tax roll, authorized to deduct a oommissionfor the collectionand disbursementof Road District Funds. in addition to the maximum comnensation of $Z;OOO.OOper annum, provided for in Article 3943, R.C.S.?" Article 3941, Revised Civil Statutes,reads as r0ii0ws: Vhe county treasurer shall receive commissions on the moneys reoeivedand paid out by him, said aommissions to be fixed by order of the commissionersoourt as follows: For reoeiving all moneys, other than school funds, for the county, not exceeding two and one-halfper cent, and not exceeding two and one-hallper cent for paying out the same; provided, that he ,shall receive no commissionsfor receivingmoney from his predecessornor for paying over money to his suooessor in office.*Honorable1. P. Sexton, Page 2

By Artiole 3943.,

Revised Civil Statutes, as amended, the oommissionsallowed to the oount treasurer of Orange County are limitedto a maximum of $2,ooo.oo per year, none of the exoeptionsto that aunt provided in said Article 3943 and in Articles 3943a and 3943b, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes,being epplioable. While the county treasurer is made the oustodianof the funds of road districtsby Article 7529, Vernon'sAnnotated Givil Statutes, the prOViSiOnSof Article 3941, as limited by Article 3943, are nowhere added to nbr changed in anyrespect, the road district statutesoontainingno provision for additionalcompensationfor the oounty treasurer. In our opinionNo. o-1450, a copy of whioh is enclosed herewith, we held that the county treasurerof San taba county could not retain commissionsout of the proceedsof the sale of road bonds after he had received the (2,OOO.OO maximum providedby Article 3943. We refer also to the oases of Red River County v. Graves, 288,s.W. 544, and Harris County v. Chaklton, 243 S. v, UO. In our opinion your question should be answered in the negative.

Kindly permit us to thank you for the comprehensive brief accompanyingyour request.
Yours very truly
APPROVED JUL 23, 1941 /e/ Grover Sellers
FIRST ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL ATTORNEY GRNKML OF TEXAS
BY Glenn R. Lewis

Assistant

GRL:LM APPROVZD OPIXIONCOXUITTRR BY BWB CIjAIFUN
RWCLOSURR
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 8 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 8 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 8 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 8 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 8 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 8 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 8 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 7 of 7
#### Edward NICASTRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-2134.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 14, 2005.

Edward Nicastro, Brooklyn, NY, for Appellant, pro se.

Susan Choi-Hausman, Assistant Corporation Counsel, City of New York Law Department, New York, NY, for Appellee.

Present: OAKES, KEARSE, and SACK, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.

*358Edward Nicastro appeals, *pro se,*from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Nicholas G. Garaufis, *Judge),*granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee in an action brought by Nicastro under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e *et seq.*

We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment *de novo,*“drawing] all reasonable inferences against the party whose motion is under consideration” where cross-motions for summary judgment are filed, *Boy Scouts of America v. Wyman,*335 F.3d 80, 88 (2d Cir.2003) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Summary judgment is proper “if ... there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c).

Upon review of the record and the applicable law, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court.

We note at the outset that Nicastro appeals from the district court’s decision only as to his retaliation claim. Nicastro has failed to meet his burden—which, to survive a summary judgment motion, is “de minimis,” *Slattery v. Swiss Reinsurance Am. Carp.,*248 F.3d 87, 94 (2d Cir. 2001) (internal quotation marks, citation, and brackets omitted)—of establishing a *prima facie*case of retaliation, because he has not shown a causal connection between his protected activity and the subsequent adverse employment action taken against him. Nicastro was subject to adverse employment actions well before he engaged in protected activity, and his demotion and salary reduction occurred almost ten months after this activity. Although “temporal proximity can demonstrate a causal nexus,” *id.*at 95, such proximity must be close, *see Cifra v. G.E. Co.,*252 F.3d 205, 217 (2d Cir.2001). And “[wjhere timing is the only basis for a claim of retaliation, and gradual adverse job actions began well before the plaintiff had ever engaged in any protected activity, an inference of retaliation does not arise,” *Slattery,*248 F.3d at 95. Moreover, even if a *prima facie*case were established, Nicastro has failed to offer sufficient evidence to raise a genuine issue as to whether the legitimate non-retaliatory reasons given by the defendantappellee for the ultimate adverse action were pretextual.

We have reviewed Nicastro’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. The judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.
Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 24 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 13 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 13 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. DUVALL

Case No. 72PC

Case below: 50 NC App 684

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 7 April 1981.
Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 1 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 2 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 3 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 4 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 5 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 6 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 7 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 8 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 9 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 10 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 11 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 12 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 13 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 14 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 15 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 16 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 17 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 18 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 19 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 20 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 21 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 22 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 23 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 24 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 25 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 26 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 27 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 28 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 29 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 30 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 31 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 32 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 33 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 34 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 35 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 36 of 37Case 7:07-cv-03432-CS-MDF Document 11-7 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 37 of 37
-,.

'

1m'

~

. DISTRICT COURT

OLl'" RICTOFNEWYORK 07. C\T

J(

JOSE CARO, Docket No.:

Plaintiff,

-against3380

RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE

STATEMENT

,..; ,}. j,- j' \

AMERICAN AIRLINES INC.!) ~~ -I \,'i/ !:-:-~ , , , , : :1 ~ : I I

. . .~! :~

i-Ii' :j

Defendant. ;Ii I: APR272007 );1 J( llU!

. .

.

.

.

-

.

..'. . -. I

..~ r,. ~. '. ~ S:'tIo"'.~'\.o ';>,'" ~ 1, .

I, DAVID S. RUTHERFORD, attorney for defendant, ericantJdrHnes;'IiIc':1h~vi!1t filed

an initial pleading in the above-captioned matter, makes the following disclosure to the Court

pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, identifying anycorporate parents, and

any publicly held corporation that owns ten percent or more of the defendant's stock:

AA 2002 CLASS C CERTIFICATE CORP.

M 2002 CLASS D CERTIFICATE CORP.

AA 2003-1 CLASS C CERTIFICATE CORP.

AA 2003-1 CLASS D CERTIFICATE CORP.

AA DEPOSITOR CORP.

AA REAL ESTATE HOLDING, OP LLC

AA REAL ESTATE HOLDING, LP

AAV TOURS, LLC

AAV/UK.TOURS, LLC

ADMIRALS CLUBS, INC. -(Massachusetts only)

AEROSAN S.A.

AEROSAN AIRPORT SERVICES S.A.

AMERICAN AIRLINES DE ME)(!CO, S.A.

AMERICAN AIRLINES DE VENEWELA, S.A.

AMERICAN AIRLINES REALTY (NYC) - HOLDING, INC.

AMR TRAINING GROUP, INC.

AMR VENTURES ill, INC.

ONEWORLD ALLIANCE, LLP

ONEWORLD MANAGEMENT COMPANY LTD.

TEXAS AERO ENGINE SERVICES, L.L.C. dba -

TAESL (50/50 AAJROLLS-ROYCE)

TW A AIRLINES, LLC

TW A STOCK HOLDING COMPANY, LLC

TRANS WORLD PARS, LLC

AMERICAS GROUND SERVICES, INC.

AERODESP ACHOS COLOMBIA, S.A.

CARIBBEAN DISPATCH SERVICES, LTD.

DISPATCH SERVICES 93, S.A.

DSA

INTERNATIONAL GROUND SERVICES, - S.A. DE C.V.

PANAMA DISPATCH

PERU DISPATCH COMPANY

AMR EAGLE HOLDING CORPORATION

AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC.

AMR LEASING CORPORATION

AERO PERLAS

EAGLE AVIATION SERVICES, INC.

EXECUTIVE AIRLINES, INC.

AMR FOREIGN SALES CORPORATION LTD

AMR INVESTIGATION SERVICES, INC.

AMERICAN PRIVATE EQUITY -

MANAGEMENT, LLC

AVION ASSURANCE LTD.

PMA INVESTMENT SUBSIDIARY, INC.

SC INVESTMENT, INC.

- - - -

Case 1:07-cv-03380-JGK Document 2 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. HAMRICK

No. 21 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 518.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 25 August 1975.
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 5 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 5 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 5 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 5 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 4 of 4