alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. VANCE V. RICHMOND.

(Filed 14 January, 1966.)

Crime Against Nature §§ 1, 2—

Specific intent to commit an unnatural sexual act is an essential element of the offense defined by C.S. 14-202.1, and when there is evidence tending to show that defendant took immoral, improper and indecent liberties with a minor, but no evidence of the essential specific intent, nonsuit must be entered.

Appeal by defendant from *Bickett,*JApril 1965 Criminal Session of ORANGE.

Criminal prosecution on an indictment charging that defendant unlawfully and wilfully, with intent to commit an unnatural sexual act, did take immoral, improper and indecent liberties with. ., a child under the age of 16 years, he, the said defendant being over the age of 16 years, a violation of G.S. 14-202.1.

Plea: Not guilty. Verdict: Guilty as charged.

From a judgment of imprisonment defendant appeals.

*Attorney General T. W. Bruton and Staff Attorney Andrew A. Vanore, Jr., for the State.*

*Dalton and Long by W. R. Dalton, Jr., for defendant appellant.*

Per Curiam.

Defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion for judgment of compulsory nonsuit made at the close of the State’s case. Defendant offered no evidence.

The indictment is drawn in the language of G.S. 14-202.1, which reads in part: “Any person over 16 years of age who, with intent to commit an unnatural sexual act, shall take, or attempt to take, any immoral, improper, or indecent liberties with any child of either sex, under the age of 16 years, * * *, shall, for the first offense, be guilty of a misdemeanor “ * In order to convict a defendant for the offense charged the State’s evidence must show beyond a reasonable doubt not only that defendant committed immoral, improper and indecent liberties with the young girl named in the indictment, but also that he committed such liberties “with intent to commit an unnatural sexual act.”

The State’s evidence, which it would'serve no useful purpose to state, shows that defendant took immoral, improper and indecent liberties with the young girl named in the indictment, but the State has no evidence in the record before us, in our opinion, from which a jury might reasonably come to the conclusion that defendant committed such liberties “with intent to commit an unnatural sexual *358act” with her or upon her. Such intent is an essential element in the crime charged and must be proved by the State. At most, the circumstances raise a mere conjecture that defendant had such an intent, and that is an insufficient foundation for a verdict and the case should not have been submitted to the jury. *S. v. Langlois,*258 N.C. 491, 128 S.E. 2d 803; *S. v. Harvey,*228 N.C. 62, 44 S.E. 2d 472; *S. v. Massey,*86 N.C. 658; *S. v. Vinson,*63 N.C. 335.

The court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a judgment of compulsory nonsuit.

Reversed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.07 MB)

Tags:india, POW/MIA, DPAA

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### Albert G. Wheeler, Jr., Appellant, *v.*Claudia T. Wheeler, Respondent.

Reported below, 172 App. Div. 955.

(Submitted November 11, 1918;

decided November 19, 1918.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February .14, 1916, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict in an action of replevin.

The motion was made upon the grounds that the Appellate Division had unanimously held that the verdict was supported by the evidence and that no questions of law were raised which could be reviewed by the Court of Appeals.

*Jonah J. Goldstein*for motion.

*Mi J. Blair*opposed.

Motion denied.
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 4 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 4 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 2 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 3 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 4 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 5 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 6 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 7 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 8 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 9 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 10 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 11 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 12 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 13 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 14 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 15 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 16 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 17 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 18 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 19 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 20 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-7 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 21 of 21
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Katy Industries,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Amir
Rosenthal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Amir Rosenthal
------------------------
Amir Rosenthal
Chief Financial Officer
March 26, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Katy Industries, Inc. and will be
retained by Katy Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                     - 46 -
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 224 (Tuesday, November 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 70579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23052]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Ravalli County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Ravalli County Resource Advisory Committee will be meeting 
to discuss 2004 projects and hold a short public forum (question and 
answer session). The meeting is being held pursuant to the authorities 
in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the 
Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. 
L. 106-393). the meeting is open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on November 22, 2005, 6:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Ravalli County 
Administration Building, 215 S. 4th Street, Hamilton, Montana. Send 
written comments to Dan Ritter, Acting District Ranger, Stevensville 
Ranger District, 88 Main Street, Stevensville, MT 59870, by facsimile 
(406) 777-7423, or electronically to [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Ritter, Acting Stevensville 
District Ranger and Designated Federal Officer, Phone: (406) 777-5461.

    Dated: November 15, 2005.
David T. Bull,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 05-23052 Filed 11-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```
#### SHIPTON v. BARFIELD

No. 90 PC.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 58.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 November 1974.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Kreisler Manufacturing Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and the
results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                              
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Michael D. Stern         
|                        |  | Michael D. Stern             
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
|                        | 
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Edward A. Stern          
|                        |  | Edward A. Stern              
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                        |  | (Principal Financial Officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and will not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed (i) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise be subject to the liability of that section; or (ii) incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 whether made before or after the date of this Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates such certification by reference.
Case 1:06-cv-15065-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET/INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED INITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          23,077
<SECURITIES>                                     5,965
<RECEIVABLES>                                  203,544
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               243,851
<PP&E>                                          60,424
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,343
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 361,163
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           79,297
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,035
<OTHER-SE>                                     272,898
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   361,163
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               227,462
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  191,110
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   187
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  49
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,328
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,516
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,812
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        
 

</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-15049-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03175-HB Document 6-2 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03175-HB Document 6-2 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
PPE CASE Notes 

Personal Protective Equipment Conformity Assessment Studies and Evaluations Notes 

Respirators used in the workplace need to be approved by the National Institute 

for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). When users experience issues with 

NIOSH-approved respirators, NIOSH initiates a Certified Product Investigation 

Process to identify the root cause and develop corrective actions. Below is an example 

of a past issue that NIOSH addressed through this process. This example focuses 

on self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) facepiece sizing issues within fire 

departments. 

ISSUES IDENTIFIED 

• SCBA facepieces did not fit all firefighters in the department because it did not 

form a tight seal against the user's face. 

• Some fire departments only ordered a single size facepiece for everyone in their 

department.

• Fire departments felt they were not getting correct information from sales 

representatives regarding SCBA facepiece sizing. 

• Fire departments reported the sizing issues as a nonconformance to NIOSH. 

BEST PRACTICE REMINDERS 

• Evaluate sizing requirements for the department before making a purchase to 

ensure all users have a facepiece that fits correctly and forms a tight seal against 

the user's face. 

• Discuss sizing with sales representatives to make sure you purchase equipment 

that is both comfortable and correctly fits the user. 

• Remember that sizing issues are not a nonconformance and NIOSH cannot 

intervene for corrective action in these cases.

• Consult local, state, and federal regulations regarding correct fit of firefighter 

PPE.

• Refer to guidelines providing direction on facepiece selection in terms of sizing, 

as well as other important considerations—for example, NFPA 1852, Standard on 

Selection, Care, and Maintenance of Open-Circuit SCBA. 

Firefighter 

SCBA Facepiece 

Sizing Issues

Photo courtesy of Bundit Jonwises/Shutterstock 

Photo courtesy of BeautifulPicture/Shutterstock 

Fire department representatives responsible for purchasing SCBAs need to understand the sizing and fit testing 

requirements of SCBA facepieces. Care must be taken to purchase the correct sizes and ensure proper fit by those 

needing respiratory protection from these devices.

Bottom Line 

Get More Information 

Find NIOSH products and get answers to workplace safety and health questions: 

1-800-CDC-INFO (1-800-232-4636) | TTY: 1-888-232-6348 

CDC/NIOSH INFO: cdc.gov/info | cdc.gov/niosh 

Monthly NIOSH eNews: cdc.gov/niosh/eNews 

https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB2020107 

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2020-107 

December 2019
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1392 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1392

 To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct an 
  assessment of the responsibilities, workload, and vacancy rates of 
suicide prevention coordinators of the Department of Veterans Affairs, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 9, 2019

  Mr. Sullivan (for himself and Mr. Tester) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct an 
  assessment of the responsibilities, workload, and vacancy rates of 
suicide prevention coordinators of the Department of Veterans Affairs, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Support for Suicide Prevention 
Coordinators Act''.

SEC. 2. COMPTROLLER GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES, WORKLOAD, 
              AND VACANCY RATES OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
              SUICIDE PREVENTION COORDINATORS.

    (a) Assessment Required.--
            (1) In general.--The Comptroller General of the United 
        States shall conduct an assessment of the responsibilities, 
        workload, training, and vacancy rates of suicide prevention 
        coordinators of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
            (2) Elements.--The assessment under paragraph (1) shall 
        include a determination of--
                    (A) the extent to which the use and staffing of 
                suicide prevention coordinators varies between 
                facilities of the Department; and
                    (B) the extent to which the Secretary of Veterans 
                Affairs provides oversight of suicide prevention 
                coordinators.
    (b) Report to Congress.--Not later than one year after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the 
Committee on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on 
Veterans' Affairs of the House of Representatives a report containing 
the findings of the assessment required by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:06-cv-15148-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15148-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15148-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15148-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15148-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15148-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15148-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15148-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15148-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15148-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15148-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15148-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15148-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
#### STATE v. BOST

No. 21 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 673.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 August 1977.
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 66-9 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 66-9 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 2 of 2