Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 69649 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. It, therefore—(1) is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a 

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this a 

routine matter that will only affect air 

traffic procedures and air navigation, it 

is certified that this rule will not have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle 1, section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. 

This rulemaking is promulgated 

under the authority described in subtitle 

VII, part A, subpart 1, section 40103, 

Sovereignty and use of airspace. Under 

that section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to ensure the 

safe and efficient use of the navigable 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority because it creates 

Class E airspace sufficient in size to 

contain aircraft executing instrument 

procedures for the Nenana Municipal 

Airport and represents the FAA’s 

continuing effort to safely and 

efficiently use the navigable airspace. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND 

CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; 

AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING 

POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 

part 71 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9N, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated September 1, 2005, and 

effective September 15, 2005, is 

amended as follows: 

* * * * * 

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace extending 

upward from 700 feet or more above the 

surface of the earth. 

* * * * * 

AAL AK E5 Nenana, AK [Revised] 

Nenana Airport, AK 

(Lat. 64°32′50′′ N., long. 149°04′26′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile 

radius of the Nenana Municipal Airport and 

within 3 miles each side of the 239° bearing 

of the Ice Pool Nondirectional Beacon (NDB) 

extending from the 6.5-mile radius to 10.3 

miles West of the airport. 

* * * * * 

Issued in Anchorage, AK, on November 8, 

2005. 

Michael A. Tarr, 

Manager, Operations Support. 

[FR Doc. 05–22767 Filed 11–16–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2005–22023; Airspace 

Docket No. 05–AAL–22] 

Revision of Class E Airspace; Egegik, 

AK 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action modifies Class E 

airspace at Egegik, AK to provide 

adequate controlled airspace to contain 

aircraft executing two revised Standard 

Instrument Approach Procedures 

(SIAPs). This rule results in revised 

Class E airspace upward from 700 feet 

(ft.) above the surface at Egegik Airport, 

AK. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, February 16, 

2006. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary 

Rolf, AAL–538G, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 222 West 7th Avenue, 

Box 14, Anchorage, AK 99513–7587; 

telephone number (907) 271–5898; fax: 

(907) 271–2850; e-mail: 

gary.ctr.rolf@faa.gov. Internet address: 

http://www.alaska.faa.gov/at. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On Friday, September 9, 2005, the 

FAA proposed to amend part 71 of the 

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 

part 71) to amend the Class E airspace 

upward from 700 ft. above the surface 

at Egegik, AK (70 FR 53595). The action 

was proposed in order to create Class E 

airspace sufficient in size to contain 

aircraft while executing two revised 

SIAPs for the Egegik Airport. The 

approaches are (1) Area Navigation 

(Global Positioning System) (RNAV 

(GPS)) Runway (RWY) 12, Amendment 

(Amdt) 1; (2) RNAV (GPS) RWY 30, 

Amdt 1. Class E controlled airspace 

extending upward from 700 ft. above the 

surface in the Egegik Airport area is 

modified by this action. Interested 

parties were invited to participate in 

this rulemaking proceeding by 

submitting written comments on the 

proposal to the FAA. No public 

comments have been received; thus the 

rule is adopted as proposed. 

The area will be depicted on 

aeronautical charts for pilot reference. 

The coordinates for this airspace docket 

are based on North American Datum 83. 

The Class E airspace areas designated as 

700/1,200 ft. transition areas are 

published in paragraph 6005 of FAA 

Order 7400.9N, Airspace Designations 

and Reporting Points, dated September 

1, 2005, and effective September 15, 

2005, which is incorporated by 

reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E 

airspace designation listed in this 

document will be published 

subsequently in the Order. 

The Rule 

This amendment to 14 CFR part 71 

revises Class E airspace at Egegik, 

Alaska. This Class E airspace is 

modified to accommodate aircraft 

executing two revised SIAPs and will be 

depicted on aeronautical charts for pilot 

reference. The intended effect of this 

rule is to provide adequate controlled 

airspace for Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) 

operations at Egegik Airport, Egegik, 

Alaska. 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. It, therefore—(1) is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a 

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this a 

routine matter that will only affect air 

traffic procedures and air navigation, it 

is certified that this rule will not have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

69650 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle 1, section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. 

This rulemaking is promulgated 

under the authority described in subtitle 

VII, part A, subpart 1, section 40103, 

Sovereignty and use of airspace. Under 

that section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to ensure the 

safe and efficient use of the navigable 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority because it creates 

Class E airspace sufficient in size to 

contain aircraft executing instrument 

procedures for the Egegik Airport and 

represents the FAA’s continuing effort 

to safely and efficiently use the 

navigable airspace. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND 

CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; 

AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING 

POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 

part 71 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9N, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated September 1, 2005, and 

effective September 15, 2005, is 

amended as follows: 

* * * * * 

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace extending 

upward from 700 feet or more above the 

surface of the earth. 

* * * * * 

AAL AK E5 Egegik, AK [Revised] 

Egegik Airport, AK 

(Lat. 58°11′08′′ N., long. 157°22′32′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile 

radius of the Egegik Airport. 

* * * * * 

Issued in Anchorage, AK, on November 8, 

2005. 

Michael A. Tarr, 

Manager, Operations Support. 

[FR Doc. 05–22766 Filed 11–16–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

28 CFR Part 45 

[OAG Docket No. 112; AG Order No. 2789–

2005] 

RIN 1105–AB11 

Procedures To Promote Compliance 

With Crime Victims’ Rights Obligations 

AGENCY: Department of Justice. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This final rule implements 

section 102(f) of the Justice for All Act, 

establishing procedures to promote 

compliance with crime victims’ rights 

statutes by Department of Justice 

employees. 

DATES: This final rule becomes effective 

December 19, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Battle, Director, Executive 

Office for United States Attorneys, 

United States Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC 20530, (202) 514–2121. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Justice for All Act 

Congress enacted, and the President 

signed, the Justice for All Act (‘‘Act’’), 

which became effective October 30, 

2004. Section 102 of the Act, 18 U.S.C. 

3771 (‘‘section 3771’’), codifies crime 

victims’’ rights, requires officers and 

employees of the Department of Justice 

(‘‘Department’’) and other government 

departments and agencies to exercise 

best efforts to accord victims those 

rights, establishes enforcement 

measures for those rights, and requires 

the Attorney General to promulgate 

regulations to promote compliance by 

responsible Department of Justice 

officials with their obligations regarding 

victims’ rights. Section 3771(f) states 

that the regulations must: (a) Designate 

an administrative authority within the 

Department to receive and investigate 

complaints relating to the provision or 

violation of the rights of a crime victim 

by Department employees; (b) require a 

course of training for Department 

employees and offices that fail to 

comply with their obligations regarding 

victims’ rights; (c) contain disciplinary 

sanctions for willful and wanton failure 

to comply with obligations regarding 

victims’ rights; and (d) provide that the 

Attorney General or his designee shall 

be the final arbiter of a complaint. See 

18 U.S.C. 3771(f). 

Proposed Rule 

In order to implement section 102 of 

the Act, the Department published a 

proposed rule on July 7, 2005, that 

proposed to create a new section in part 

45, Employee Responsibilities, of title 

28, Judicial Administration, of the Code 

of Federal Regulations. 70 FR 39206–01. 

The proposed rule provided for the 

creation of the office of the Victims’

Rights Ombudsman (VRO) within the 

Executive Office for United States 

Attorneys (EOUSA) as the designated 

administrative authority within the 

Department to receive and investigate 

complaints relating to the provision or 

violation of the rights of a crime victim. 

The proposed rule delineated the 

powers and duties of the VRO as well 

as the basic procedures of its operations. 

The proposed rule authorized the 

VRO to designate points of contact 

(POCs) in each office of the Department 

to perform initial investigations and 

review of complaints, in order to allow 

for complaints to be addressed at the 

most local level. 

The proposed rule then established a 

procedure for filing complaints, 

investigations of those complaints, and 

imposition of disciplinary sanctions 

against employees where warranted. 

The proposed rule required that a 

complaint be in writing and contain 

sufficient information to enable an 

investigation of the complaint by the 

POC. Complaints were to be filed within 

30 days of the alleged violation of a 

victim’s rights, unless the victim 

demonstrated good cause for the delay. 

The precise requirements for the 

investigation were to be established by 

internal Department policy guidance. At 

the end of the investigation, the POC 

was to prepare a written report of the 

results of the investigation, including a 

signed statement by the victim as to 

whether or not he was satisfied that his 

complaint had been resolved. In either 

case, however, the report was to be 

forwarded to the VRO for review. The 

VRO would then decide whether (a) no 

further action was necessary; (b) further 

investigation, to be conducted by the 

VRO, was necessary; or (c) the employee 

would be required to undergo training 

or be subject to disciplinary sanctions. 

The VRO’s determination was not to be 

dependent on the victim’s satisfaction, 

although it could be taken into account. 

The VRO would be the final arbiter of 

whether the complaint had been 

adequately addressed.