alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 30, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71790-71791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23354]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 05-2944; MB Docket No. 04-161; RM-10961, RM-11111]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Baltimore, Mount Sterling, 
Wilmington, and Zanesville, OH

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In response to a Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 69 FR 29255 
(May 21, 2004), this Report and Order downgrades Channel 273B, Station 
WHIZ-FM, Zanesville, Ohio, to Channel 273B1, reallots that channel to 
Baltimore, Ohio, and modifies the license of Station WHIZ-FM 
accordingly. The coordinates for Channel 273B1 at Baltimore, Ohio, are 
39-47-51 NL and 82-36-07 WL, with a site restriction of 5.3 kilometers 
(3.3 miles) south of Baltimore. This allotment is made contingent upon 
concurrence by the Canadian government. These changes in the FM Table 
of Allotments were made pursuant to a settlement agreement in this 
rulemaking proceeding, by which the licensee of Station WKLN(FM), 
Channel 272A, Wilmington, Ohio, withdrew its Petition for Rule Making 
which sought to reallot Channel 272A to Mount Sterling, Ohio. Station 
WKLN(FM)'s proposal was mutually exclusive with the proposal of Station 
WHIZ-FM.

DATES: Effective December 27, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R. Barthen Gorman, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

[[Page 71791]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MB Docket No. 04-161, adopted November 9, 2005, and 
released November 10, 2005. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC's Reference Information Center at Portals II, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The document may also be 
purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and 
Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, 
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or http://www.BCPIWEB.com. The Commission will send a copy of this Report and 
Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government 
Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 
U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio, Radio broadcasting.

0
Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as 
follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

0
1. The authority citation for part 73 reads as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec.  73.202  [Amended]

0
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Ohio, is amended 
by removing Zanesville, Channel 273B, and by adding Baltimore, Channel 
273B1.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 05-23354 Filed 11-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### STATE v. HARPER

No. 64 PC.

Case below: 21 N.C. App. 30.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 May 1974.
Case 7:07-cv-03410-CLB Document 5 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 7:07-cv-03410-CLB Document 5 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 11 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15116-AKH Document 6-2 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 6 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 7 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 8 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 9 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 10 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 11 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 12 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 13 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 14 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 15 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 16 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 17 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 18 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 19 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 20 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 21 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 22 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 23 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 24 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 25 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 26 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 27 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 28 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 29 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 30 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 31 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 32 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 33 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 34 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 35 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 36 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 37 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 38 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 39 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 40 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 41 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 42 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 43 of 44
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-3 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 44 of 44
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

..................................................................... X 

IN RE: Fosamax Products Liability 

Litigation, 1:06-md-1789 (JFK) Order ----------------------.------------.-- X 

This Document Relates to: All Actions : 

...................................... x 

JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District Judge: 

Section 2(a) of the Court's practices generally 

requires a pre-motion conference before a party may make any 

motion. This requirement is hereby waived with respect to 

motions to remand filed in this multi-district litigation because 

the jurisdictional issues typically raised by such motions can be 

resolved more efficiently without a conference. Accordingly, it 

is ORDERED that plaintiffs may file motions to remand without 

first requesting a pre-motion conference. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: New York, New York 

November / 4, 2007 

\, 

JOHN F. KEENAN 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03459-JFK Document 14 Filed 11/14/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15134-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
**UN PUBLISHED**  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7068** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. MOHAMMAD ASHRAF MOHAMMAD

- OMAR , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for t he Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Claude M. Hilton , Senior District Judge. ( 1:07

- cr - 00425

- CMH

- 3; 1:10

- cv - 01112

- CMH )

Submitted : February 9 , 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismisse d by un published per curiam opinion
.
Mohammad Ashraf Mohammad

- Omar, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER C URIAM: Mohammad Ashraf Mohammad

- Omar seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying him leave to amend his previously denied 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2011 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificat e of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the meri ts, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional r ight. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mohammad

- Omar has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument be cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-3 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 1 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-3 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 2 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-3 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 3 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-3 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 4 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-3 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 5 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-3 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 6 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-3 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 7 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-3 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 8 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-3 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 9 of 10
Case 7:07-cv-03305-KMK-LMS Document 12-3 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 10 of 10
Exhibit 32

             Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
   As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Louisville Gas and Electric
Company and Kentucky Utilities Company (the "Companies") on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned does
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's
knowledge,

1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Companies as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.


August 14, 2006

                         /s/  Victor A. Staffieri
                     Chairman of the Board, President
                        and Chief Executive Officer
                    Louisville Gas and Electric Company
                        Kentucky Utilities Company




                          /s/  S. Bradford Rives
                          Chief Financial Officer
                    Louisville Gas and Electric Company
                        Kentucky Utilities Company


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 67 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 67 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 67 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 3 of 3
# -71,33?-' jf_e]oimfy_ iQj %6tr .,_.' TV\i> fo V ;a resf>w \o uour letter ^tU feU^i/y Sjl^\% .iXttt you J-k»\l fVftft'fr' ON^ Slf 1> U< <Vn 1*1- W^> cW«l u^.TUtrtleyJK. . ._ • ,, . _3vAct<*ly olc3

Y\Ua. W»lV.<^ttiT3M^3> 

### -COURTOFCRIMiwaribB---—•• — — --—-.Jkfe^b-FLX&tDl 17 111 %

.^-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT . I---- 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ~.. 

__C__-- 

...................................................... X 

1N RE: Fosamax Products Liability 

Litigation 1:06-rnd-1789 (JFK) 

...................................................... x ORDER FOR ADMISSION 

This Document Relates to: MDL-1789 : PRO HAC VICE 

Fredericku Allen v. Merck Cose Nu .l)6-cv-9452 

BricI,wr Arcernon1 v Merck (.>o.$e lli~.. 07-1.1.-3389 : 

I.i~,~iliill Bergesiin 1,. .Mr,!ck ('usc, Gi. , 06-~,-Y454 

.Shirio HO/L.I I ,Me~.ik i o.w i\r, 116-~~~94jj 

.\'hrri.i,ii Brotllorli I. .Me~.ck ( osr .'o O--LL-~T? 

1 I I. I! . .\/erck Citse Xu.. 107-cv- 14 13 : 

Rciher~o Brudin v. ,.M~rck C'use No : 07-cv-3466 

Ure~ldu Curpenrer 1,. Merck Cose Nu.: 07-cr-346-1 

Sonjd Doroff v. MrrcL Cose Ko.: 07-cv-3162 

Debro Flc~res r. Mgrck Case No.: 07-c1,-0211? 

Yo~idrii Huii 1,. Mrrck CIS@ No.: 07-~~3167 

Po~r.~o Hor4 v. .Merck C'use No.: 07-cv-797 

C'oru(vn Hester L.. hJer~.k Case ,No.:06-cr-9450 

f'anieiu Hir~es v. Merck Cose No.: O:-~v-180 

l(ocheiic Keni~ r,. Merck ibse No.: 07-~1'-00478 

Anriu A/eril'i~i Y. .L(t.rck Case No 0'-cv-3163 

.iu~lrcc, :Woe i Merck (as2 Yo.. 0'-ci:-00479 

, \I 1 ;b/erik Cu,\e (Vu 06-c,.-Yf j i 

I ii 1 Lferck i 'iis? 30 . 07-r1~-3465 

Tonilit, l'orle~. v. .Llrri.k Cuse n'u. 07-0-790 

..Murgurer Sizelure 1'. .b/t,r~,k Case ,Yo.: 07-cv-3459 : 

~\.fu.ritie Skilrrs 1, Merck Cose No.. 07-cv-3-16 i 

Edno Sykes v. Merck Cose No. :U7-cv-i1!2 

Kafhler.rr Tuelke v. Merck Cose No.. U6-~.v-7629 

Rgna Vun~le~.cur v. Meri.L Case No.06-cv-i 1329 : 

"V?~i!ie Wade r hlerck Cuse No.:06-cv-9453 

Carol Young I:. Merrk Case No. Ub-c1.-0531 

Bonnie L~~rglrlirr v. MrrcA Case No.:07-m-1827 

___________________-----------------------------------. 

Ccinsidering the Certilicate of Good Standing submitted by counsel, 1T IS 

HEREBY OROEKED that: 

Case 1:07-cv-03462-JFK Document 3 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 1 of 3
Meghnn M. Tans 

1.e~ in. Papantonio. Thomas. Mitchell. Echsner & Proctor. P.A. 

316 S. Baylen Street. Suite 400 

P.O. Hi>s 11308 (31591 ) 

Penjacol;i. FL 32502 

Phone: (850) 435-71 81 

Facsimile: (850) 436-6181 

Email: mtans~levinlaw.com 

is admitted to practice pro hac vice as counsel for the plaintiffs in the above-referenced 

MDL proceedlne 

Signed this day of 

Yorl. % . 2007. at w*. New 

Case 1:07-cv-03462-JFK Document 3 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 2 of 3
\(I :.:(I i<~. ','I<, l r8~~1cn~c 1 ll)~>d ~IJIIJIIIL. 

STATES DISTRICT COURT 

RIIDD12E DISTRICT OF FI>ORID.A 

CERTIFIC.4TE OF GOOD STANDING 

I. Siio:~ I I.. i.oesi.ii , ('1ei.k ($iiiis C'oiiri, 

i.wli/i . . rhii/ ;Ll~,,yliir~r ;2% T(iirs, Btii- Y 0088874.i. 

11 (1.y drili~ ~iiliiriii~~ii 10 /mr[,iic~, 111iiii.~ C01ii.1 oii 

.A/>ril 32, 200.5. ciiiil is iii good siciiitlii~g 

trs tr nrei~ihcr of [lie 8~11 ofilris C'oiii.~. 

Case 1:07-cv-03462-JFK Document 3 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### STATE v. INNMAN

No. 76 PC.

Case below: 11 N.C. App. 202.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals' denied 10 June 1971.
#### STATE v. HARRELSON

No. 131 PC.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 349.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 27 January 1982. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 27 January 1982.
Case 1:07-cv-03386-LBS     Document 9      Filed 03/04/2008     Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
               CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
Biomet, Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that to his knowledge on
the date hereof:

(a)  The Form 10-K of the Company for the Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 2002 filed
     on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
     "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                          /s/ Dane A. Miller
                                          ----------------------
                                          Dane A. Miller, Ph.D.
                                          April 4, 2003

                                          /s/ Gregory D. Hartman
                                          ----------------------
                                          Gregory D. Hartman
                                          April 4, 2003
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Bontan Corporation Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The annual report on Form 20-F of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bontan Corporation Inc.








Date:  July 24, 2012








/s/ Kam Shah





Kam Shah


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL     Document 3      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL     Document 3      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 58-4 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 1 of 3
Reconstituted Text (With Graphic on Next Page)

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 58-4 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 2 of 3
FAX COVER SHEET

To: Jerry V, Leaphart

Attorney-at-Law

Phone Number. (2030-825-6265

FAX Number: (203) 825-6256

From:

Juventíno R. "Rich" Garcia

Air Force Research Laboratory/DEO-F A

3550 Aberdeen Avenue SE

Kirtland AFB NM 87117-5776

Commercial (Voice): (505) 846-1911

FAX: (505)846-0423

Number of Pages (including cover): 1

Date Sent May 4 2007

MESSAGE: I received your fax yesterday and your FedEx package today, and had a chance to review the

materials you sent. During our telephone conversation I outlined a variety of directed energies that might

have future weapons applications but I'm not aware of any that are mature enough to cause the damage at

the World Trade Center. Lasers are the most likely candidates for nearer-term weapons use and, to that enc,

we have conducted laboratory tests to evaluate the effects of laser energy on different materials. For the

most part, those materials have been metals, not concrete structures. Effects on metals are from the heat

generated by an intense beam of coherent light, which cause the metals to weaken and split. Given

sufficient heat, metals would melt (become liquids) and, given significantly more heat, could turn to gases.

Since we haven't tested concrete I don't know if the effect would be dust. You report phenomena that we

cannot explain here, either because we don't have enough data or because the phenomena are not within our

area of expertise. While on a personal level I may find Dr Wood's investigation interesting and worthy of

further consideration, on a professional level we are unable to devote our limited resources to activities

outside of our charter, I wish you success in your endeavor and am available to answer whatever directed

energy questions may arise.

Respectfully,

JUVEISTTINO R GARCÍA

Director of Public Affairs

Directed Energy Directorate

Air Force Research Laboratory

Kirtland AFB, NM 87117-6776

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 58-4 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 3 of 3
✎AO 85 (Rev. 8/98) Notice, Consent, and Order of Reference — Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

District of

NOTICE, CONSENT, AND ORDER OF REFERENCE —

EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES

Plaintiff MAGISTRATE JUDGE

V.

Case Number:

Defendant

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

TO EXERCISE JURISDICTION

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(c), and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73, you are notified that a United States

magistrate judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or nonjury trial,

and to order the entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by a magistrate judge is, however, permitted only if all

parties voluntarily consent.

You may, without adverse substantive consequences, withhold your consent, but this will prevent the court’s jurisdiction

from being exercised by a magistrate judge. If any party withholds consent, the identity of the parties consenting or withholding

consent will not be communicated to any magistrate judge or to the district judge to whom the case has been assigned.

An appeal from a judgment entered by a magistrate judge shall be taken directly to the United States court of appeals for

this judicial circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of this district court.

CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73, the parties in this case consent to have a United

States magistrate judge conduct any and all proceedings in this case, including the trial, order the entry of a final judgment, and

conduct all post-judgment proceedings.

Party Represented Signatures Date

ORDER OF REFERENCE

IT IS ORDERED that this case be referred to

United States Magistrate Judge, to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

§636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73.

Date United States District Judge

NOTE: RETURN THIS FORM TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT ONLY IF ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED 

ON THIS FORM TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 4-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 1 of 1