alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

I, David D. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of Koss Corporation (the “Company”),hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:

 

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company forthe quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany.

 

 
|   | /s/  David D. Smith             |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | David  D. Smith                 |
|   | Executive  Vice President and   |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer        |
|   | Date:   June 30, 2010 |

 

Note:  This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not be deemed filed, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Company for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

----
CC Filed by Filing Services Canada Inc. 403-717-3898


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO

NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT




This Amendment No. 2 to Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (“Amendment”) is entered into as of this 20th day of February 20, 2007 by and between Micron Enviro Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and Stephen J. Amdahl under the 2006C Stock Nonqualified Stock Option Plan.

 

RECITALS:




WHEREAS, the parties entered into the Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2006 (“Option Agreement”) and first amendment occurred on September 14, 2006.  Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Option Agreement; and




WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Option Agreement as set forth herein.




AGREEMENT:




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:




1 In exchange for Grantee’s promise of continued service in his capacity as a director of the Corporation, Section 2 and Section 4 of the Option Agreement shall be amended to extend the expiry date to May 21, 2007.




2.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same document.




3. Except as so expressly amended, the Option Agreement is ratified and confirmed by the parties and, as hereby amended, shall be deemed and construed as a single instrument in full force and effect; provided, however, in the case of any conflict or inconsistency between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the prior Option Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 2 to Option Agreement as of the date set forth above.







Micron Enviro Systems, Inc.

  Stephen J. Amdahl







By:

/s/ Bradley Rudman

/s/ Stephen J. Amdahl

Name: 

/s/ Bradley Rudman

Title: 

President, Director, CFO
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**FORM 10-Q**

 

**Section 1350 Certifications**

 

**Quarter ended March 31, 2011**

 

I, Dan W. Snyder, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director of Kenilworth Systems Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the third quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  May 13, 2011

 
|   | /s/   Dan W. Snyder                                |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Chief   Executive Officer, President, and Director |

 

----
- 81-110_Cover0001
- 81-110
- 81-110_BC0001
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Koss Corporation (the "Company") for the
quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Koss, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


                                                /s/ Michael J. Koss
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Michael J. Koss
                                                Chief Executive Officer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                Date:  May 8, 2003


Note: This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed, except to the extent
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Case 1:07-cv-03398-BSJ     Document 4      Filed 07/13/2007     Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. GATEWOOD

No. 163 PC.

Case below: 46 N.C. App. 28.

Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 15 July 1980.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK______________________________________x

LAWRENCE BURLEY and FRANKLYNJACKSON,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

THE CITY OF NEWBURG, POLICE OFFICERROBERT VASTA, POLICE OFFICERNICHOLAS CARDINALE and UNKNOWNPOLICE OFFICERS 1-5, 

Defendants.______________________________________x

07-CV-3336 (SR)

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF LAW OFFICE ADDRESS

DATED: Newburgh, NYJune 12, 2007 Respectfully,

COBB & COBB

By:                                             JOHN COBB (JC 9884)Attorneys for plaintiffs724 BroadwayNewburgh, NY  12550(845) 351-5612

Case 7:07-cv-03336-SCR     Document 5      Filed 06/12/2007     Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 70880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23301]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-05-042]


Sunshine Act; Meeting

Agency Holding The Meeting:  United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time And Date:  December 1, 2005 at 11 a.m.

Place:  Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436.

Telephone:  (202) 205-2000.

Status:  Open to the public.

Matters To Be Considered: 
    1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. No. 731-TA-287 (Review) (Raw In-Shell Pistachios from 
Iran)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to 
transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary 
of Commerce on or before December 15, 2005.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: November 21, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-23301 Filed 11-21-05; 3:10 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
SCPW

- 23-0000711

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I

CAMERON NICE and MARTHA NICE, Petitioners,

vs. THE HONORABLE RANDAL VALENCIANO, Judge of the Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit, State of Hawai ʻ i, Respondent Judge.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 5CCV-22-0000027)

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza JJ., and Circuit Judge Kawamura , in place of Devens, J., recused) Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration and “Motion to Compel,” both filed on April 19, 2024, and the record, we construe both the motion for reconsideration and “Motion to Compel” to seek reconsideration of this court’s April 2, 2024 order denying the petition. Petitioners’ reconsideration request is untimely because the request was filed more than ten days after the filing of this court’s Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-23-0000711 23-APR-2024 09:32 AM Dkt. 47 ODMR2 April 2, 2024 order denying the petition. See Hawai ʻ i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(a) (2000).

It is ordered that the motions are denied.

This case is closed. It is further ordered that the appellate clerk shall not accept additional filings from

Petitioners in this case. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, April 23 , 2024. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Shirley M. Kawamura
### FOR PUBLICATION


### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  T HE A TTORNEY G ENERAL OF G UAM ,

Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 03-15823 v. CV-03-00008 W ILLIAM R. T HOMPSON , in his 

#  District of Guam, official capacity as Executive Agana Manager of Guam Airport Authority, Defendant-Appellee. 

# 

 T HE A TTORNEY G ENERAL OF G UAM ,

Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-15999

v. CV-03-00008 W ILLIAM R. T HOMPSON , in his District of Guam,



#  official capacity as Executive Agana Manager of Guam Airport ORDER Authority, Defendant-Appellant. 

# 

Filed March 2, 2006

Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Consuelo M. Callahan, and

Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Subsequent to the issuance of our opinion affirming the district court’s dismissal of the Attorney General of Guam’s action, but prior to the our consideration of his petition for

2107rehearing, the Supreme Court denied certiorari to review the final decision of the Guam Supreme Court in A.B. Won Pat Guam International Airport Authority v. Moylan , 2005 WL 291577 (Guam Terr.,2005). A.B. Won Pat Guam International Airport Authority v. Moylan , ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 338 (Mem), 163 L.Ed.2d 50 (Oct. 3, 2005). The Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari concluded the litigation in the Guam courts that was parallel to this federal action. The district court’s decision to abstain and to dismiss this federal action was based on that pending action in the Guam courts. This appeal is from that decision.

We are of the opinion that the Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari in A.B. Won Pat Guam International Airport Authority v. Moylan moots the underlying litigation. The underlying questions concerning the interpretation of the 1998 Amendment to the Guam Organic Act have been resolved. Accordingly, as a matter of prudence, we hereby withdraw our August 16, 2005 opinion, vacate the district court’s April 1, 2003 decision dismissing the Attorney General’s action, and remand the case to the district court to dismiss the action
as moot.
The pending petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc are denied without prejudice to the filing of a petition for rehearing from this order. 2108 A TTORNEY G ENERAL OF G UAM v. T HOMPSONPRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.
Exhibit 12.1



I, Arthur H. del Prado, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of ASM International N.V.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 17, 2006.













|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|/s/    ARTHUR H. DEL
PRADO                 
|Arthur H. del Prado Chief Executive Officer
|
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In connection with the annual report of CDKNet.Com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending May 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 21, 2005 (the "Report"), I,
Oleg Logvinov, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/ Oleg Logvinov
----------------------------------
Oleg Logvinov
Chief Executive Officer
September 21, 2005


A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1
                                                                   ------------


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report included in this Form 10-K into Barrett Resources
Corporation's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-3, File Nos.
333-51985, 333-51461 and 333-85809 and on Form S-8, File Nos. 333-36594, 333-
29669, 333-18311, 333-29577, 333-02529 and 333-79849.


                                    /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

                                    ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Denver, Colorado
March 30, 2001
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. FR ANC ISC O VALLE M ANJAR REZ, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 12-50496

D.C . No. 3:12-c r-01449-B EN-1
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia R oge r T. B e nite z , Distric t Judge , Pre s iding Subm itte d July

7, 2014 ** Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia B e fore : SILVER

M AN, TALLM AN, a

nd R AW L INSON, C irc uit Judge s. Franc isc o Va lle M anja

rre z a ppe a ls the 46-m onth se nte nc e im pose d by the distric t c o urt following his guilty ple a to im porting 11.03 kilogra

m s of c oc a ine into 

# FIL ED
AUG 01 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S

. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).the U nite d State s from M e xic o in viola t ion of 21 U.S.C . §§ 952 a nd 960. W e
a ffirm
. The distric t c ourt prope rly re fuse d to c onside r hy

pothe tic a l pa

rtic ipa nts whe n it found tha

t the de fe nda

nt wa s not a

m inor pa rtic ipa nt for purpose s of Unite d State s Se nte nc i ng Guide line § 3B 1.2(b). Unite d State s v . Rojas-Millan , 234 F.3d 464, 473 (9th C ir. 2000). Thedistric t c o urt a l so prope rly

c onside re d the fa c ts of the c rim e . Unite d State s v . Hurtado , No. 13-50170, 2014 W L 3720241, a

t *3 (9th C ir. July

7, 2014) ; Unite d State

s v . Rodrigue

z-C astro , 641 F.3d 1189, 1193 (9th C ir. 2011). Them e re fa c t tha t the de fe nda

nt wa s a c ourie r did not e ntitlehim to a m inor role a djustm e nt. Id. The distric t c ourt did not c le a rly e rr in finding tha

t the d e fe nda

nt wa s a run-of-the -m i ll drug sm uggle r for m one y , no be tte r, no worse . The de fe nda

nt a c c e pte d

pa ym e nt a nd a ve hic le in e xc ha

nge for im

porting a la rge qua ntity of drugs, 11 kilogra

m s of c oc a ine , into thec ountry . Id. Nor did the distric t c ourt a buse its disc re t ion whe n it se nte nc e d the de fe nda n t to them inim

um guide line se nt e nc e a fte r c onside ring a ll of there le va nt
se nte nc ing fa c t ors. AFFIRM E D.

2
|Exhibit 12.2                       
|-----------------------------------
|
|
|                                   
|
|                                   
|Income from continuing operations  
|before cumulative effect of changes
|in accounting principle            
|Add:                               
|Equity investment (income) loss    
|Minority interests in subsidiaries 
|                                   
|Income subtotal                    
|                                   
|Add:                               
|Taxes on income                    
|Kansas City earnings tax           
|                                   
|Total taxes on income              
|                                   
|Interest on value of leased        
|property                           
|Interest on long-term debt         
|Interest on short-term debt        
|Mandatorily redeemable Preferred   
|Securities                         
|Other interest expense             
|and amortization                   
|                                   
|Total fixed charges                
|                                   
|Earnings before taxes on           
|income and fixed charges           
|                                   
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges 
|
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 2-7 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 2-7 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 2-7 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 2-7 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 2-7 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 2-7 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 2-7 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 2-7 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 2-7 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 2-7 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03438-PKC Document 2-7 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 11 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-4 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-4 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-4 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-4 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-4 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-4 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-4 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-4 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-4 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-4 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 18-4 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 11 of 11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

GARY T. MARGIOTTA,

Plaintiff, ELECTRONICALLY FILED

- against - Civil Case No.: 6:07-cv-00560

(DNH/GHL)

THE CITY OF GLOVERSVILLE, TIMOTHY HUGHES, 

both individually and as Mayor of the City of Gloversville, 

JAMES HANDY, both individually and as Councilman at 

Large of the City of Gloversville, CYNTHIA MOREY, 

both individually and as Councilwoman of the City of

Gloversville, LANCE GUNDERSEN, SR., both

individually and as Councilman of the City of Gloversville, 

LOU ANN WARREN, both individually and as 

Councilman of the City of Gloversville,

Defendants. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on June 13, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing Notice of

Appearance with the Clerk of the District Court using the CM/ECF system, which sent notification

of such filing to the following:

1. Elmer Robert Keach III, Esq., Attorney for Plaintiff

 at bobkeach@keachlawfirm.com.

 /S/ Loretta M. Glogowski 

Loretta M. Glogowski for

Gregg T. Johnson, Esq.

Bar Roll No.: 506443

Case 7:07-cv-03381-GAY Document 6 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03239-RPP     Document 10      Filed 02/22/2008     Page 1 of 1