alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           27448
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   390602
<ALLOWANCES>                                     17320
<INVENTORY>                                      65340
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                628510
<PP&E>                                         6163600
<DEPRECIATION>                                  390556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8609376
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           934410
<BONDS>                                        3292852
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        572088
<OTHER-SE>                                     1146199
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8609376
<SALES>                                        1030356
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1030356
<CGS>                                           657345
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   832486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   173
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              122869
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 118198
<INCOME-TAX>                                     47287
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              70911
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     70911
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62


</TABLE>
#### POYTHRESS v. J. P. STEVENS

No. 158 PC.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 376.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 27 January 1982.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1827 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude corporations 

operating prisons from the definition of taxable REIT subsidiary. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 13, 2019 

Mr. WYDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

corporations operating prisons from the definition of taxable REIT subsidiary. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ending Tax Breaks 

5 for Private Prisons Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CORPORATIONS OPERATING PRIS7 ON FACILITIES FROM DEFINITION OF TAX8 ABLE REIT FACILITY. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 856(l)(3) of the Internal 

10 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1827 IS

1 (1) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting 

2 the following: 

3 ‘‘(A) any corporation which— 

4 ‘‘(i) directly or indirectly operates or 

5 manages a lodging facility or a health care 

6 facility, or 

7 ‘‘(ii) directly or indirectly operates or 

8 manages a prison facility or provides serv9 ices at or in connection with a prison facil10 ity, and’’, 

11 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘any lodg12 ing facility or health care facility’’ and inserting 

13 ‘‘any lodging facility, health care facility, or prison 

14 facility’’, and 

15 (3) by striking the last sentence and inserting 

16 the following: ‘‘Subparagraph (B) shall not apply to 

17 rights provided to an eligible independent contractor 

18 to operate or manage a lodging facility, a health 

19 care facility, or a prison facility if such rights are 

20 held by such corporation as a franchisee, licensee, or 

21 in a similar capacity and such lodging facility, health 

22 care facility, or prison facility is either owned by 

23 such corporation or is leased to such corporation 

24 from the real estate investment trust.’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1827 IS

1 (b) DEFINITION OF PRISON FACILITY.—Section 

2 856(l)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend3 ed by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

4 ‘‘(C) PRISON FACILITY.—The term ‘prison 

5 facility’ means any correctional, detention, or 

6 penal facility.’’. 

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Order entered February 24, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 21 - 00005 - CV IN RE JUAN FRANCISCO TURCIOS, Relator O rigi n Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dalla s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F11 - 70886 - P & F11 - 70896 - P

ORDER Before Justices Myers, Partida

- Kipness, and Carlyle Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s January 5, 2021 petition for writ of mandamus.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTI CE
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ David V. Singer
    
    
    
    /s/ Rick D. PuckettDavid V. Singer
    
    
    
    Rick D. PuckettPresident and Chief
    
    
    
    Executive Vice President,Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Chief Financial Officer,July 26, 2007
    
    
    
    Treasurer and SecretaryJuly 26, 2007
#### BANK v. CRANFILL

No. 10 PC.

No. 114 (Fall Term).

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 182.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 4 October 1978.
Case 1:07-cv-03422-RJH Document 5 Filed 09/18/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03422-RJH Document 5 Filed 09/18/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03422-RJH Document 5 Filed 09/18/2008 Page 3 of 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

HANNA A. LAYTON,

1

Respondent Below,

Appellant,

v.

JACKSON P. LAYTON,

Petitioner Below,

Appellee.

§

§ No. 378, 2018

§ 

§ Court Below—Family Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ C.A. No. CN11-03412

§ Petition No. 18-02352

§

§

§

Submitted: December 28, 2018

Decided: February 27, 2019

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on 

appeal, we conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis 

of the Family Court’s well-reasoned order dated June 25, 2018. The 

appellant’s arguments regarding the rescission of the maternal grandmother’s 

guardianship, the award of sole custody to the appellee, and subsequent events 

are outside the scope of this appeal.2 

 

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).

2 The rescission of the guardianship and award of sole custody are the subject of another 

appeal, Layton v. Layton, No. 377, 2018.
2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the 

Family Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
#### HOWELL v. FISHER

No. 171PC

Case below: 49 N.C. App. 488

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S, 7A-31 denied 4 March 1981.
IJKITED STrZTES DISTRICT COUK'I' 

SOGTHERN DISTRICT OF YEW' 1-ORK 

........ ".......... 

IN RE: 

This Uocumen~ Relcz(e.s To .-Ill .-lzlions 

MLZSTER FILE 

1 106-Mn- 1 789 (JFK) 

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE 

C'onsidcrins thc C'ct-titic'atc' i1f Good Standing and ail other docunlc~~ts required by Case 

hla~~rlgcmcnt Ordcr No. 5 suht~~irrcd by counscl, IT JS HEREBY OKLIEKED that: 

Applicant's Namc: Dana Pctcrscn Moore 

Firm Name: Venablr. LLl' 

Address: 750 E. Pratl Street, Suite 900 

CilyIStateIZip: Baltimore, Maryland 2 1202 ._ ..._-.._. ! i . - 4-r-03 __ ,-__--. --r----,- 

TelephoneIFax: (4 10) 244-7799 (4 1 0) 244-7742 

li "- - . + -..-- --'- -- -- --' I- 

_ .& ._--- &--. 

Elnail Address: dpmoore3@ver1able.cam 

is admitted to practice pro hac vice as counsel for Merck LP. Cu.. lnc. in thc above captioncd cast 

Court for the Southern Districl of Ncw Yorli. 

Dated: b, 2008 

Ticw York. N~N: York \\ , - -7 

1- --. . . .- 

United Stales L)lstr~ct Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03296-JFK Document 32 Filed 09/02/2008 Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Good 

Standing 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DISTRICT OF MARYLAND 

I, Felicia C. Cannon, Clerk of the United States District Court for the District 

of hlaryland, 

DO HEREBY CERTIFY that DANA PETERSEN MOORE, ESQ., 

BAR NUMBER 03632, was duly admitted to practice in the United States 

District Court for the District of hlaryland on DECEMBER 9, 1983, and is currently 

in good standing as a member of the bar of this Court. 

Dated at Baltimore, Maryland 

Date: August 19,2008 

FELlClA C. CANNON 

Clerk 

Catherine Scaffidi - ~dput~aerk 

Case 1:07-cv-03296-JFK Document 32 Filed 09/02/2008 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Intermagnetics General Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending May 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Glenn H. Epstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Glenn H. Epstein*
----------------------------
Glenn H. Epstein
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
October 4, 2004

* These certifications are being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to
the liability of that Section. These certifications shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.
#### HAND v. HAND

No. 193 PC.

Case below: 46 N.C. App. 82.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 15 July 1980.
HOMELESS VETERANS’ REINTEGRATION PROGRAM

Total Funding Available: $12 MILLION

Funding Opportunity Announcement for the Homeless Veterans’ 

Reintegration Program (HVRP): Reintegrating homeless veterans into 

meaningful employment and addressing the complex problems facing 

homeless veterans.

WHAT IT DOES

HVRP is an employment-focused competitive grant program designed to enable America’s veterans who are 

experiencing homelessness, or at risk of becoming homeless, to reach their full employment potential and 

obtain high-quality career outcomes. Successful grant applicants must explain in their grant application the 

complex employment-related needs and support services necessary to assist eligible veterans in their service 

area in obtaining good jobs through direct services and/or a robust referral system, as well as explain the tools, 

resources, and partnerships in place to identify, recruit, support, and prepare these individuals to find 

meaningful and sustainable employment.

THE GOALS OF THE GRANT PROGRAM ARE TO:

 Provide career exploration, training, placement, and supportive services to veterans experiencing or at risk of 

homelessness, empowering them to secure good jobs in stable, high-demand occupations paying livable wages. 

 Establish strong partnerships between public, private, and nonprofit organizations, especially those that employ 

and partner with veterans who have experienced homelessness, to deliver equitable services to marginalized 

veterans experiencing or at risk of homelessness to assist in overcoming barriers to employment. 

WHO IT SERVES

 Veterans experiencing or at risk of homelessness

 Homeless women veterans and homeless veterans with children

 Justice-involved veterans 

WHO CAN APPLY

 Nonprofit organizations with or without 501(c)(3) status with the IRS

 For profit organizations 

 Faith-based organizations

 Small businesses

 Federally recognized Native American tribal governments 

 Native American tribal organizations (other than Federally recognized tribal governments)

 State, county, city, township, or special district governments, including U.S. Territories or Possessions 

 State and Local Workforce Development Boards (SWDB/LWDB) established under the Workforce 

Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) 

 Public housing authorities/Indian housing authorities 

 Other state and local government agencies 

 Public, private and state-controlled institutions of higher education

HOW TO APPLY?

 Grants.gov; Applications are due online by March 11, 2024, no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time

Stay informed by accessing dol.gov/grants
f;-& 

' * IJ SDC SDW. ! t 

t DOCUR.iE?X i 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 E[EC!'RC::ICi3A'Y T1B.D li 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YoRK I r nm +: I: 

i. -- I i 

---------------------------------- c- 

- X : ,..._..&.---,.,. ___"_., I.d.C_.*.-+.-~-d*-l_ 

IN RE: FOSADLqX PRODUCTS LIABILmTTY : 

LITIGATION 

MDL NO. 17E9 

1 : 06-md- 1789 (JFKj 

X 

This Document Relates to: ORDER 

All actlons 

- X 

JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District Judge: 

Oral argument on Plaintiffs' notior: to compel 

production ~f documents will tdke plat-e at 1O:OG a.m. on 

June 2, 2008 in Court.room 20-C. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: New York, New York 

May 21, 2008 

x, 1 JOHN F. KEENAN \ 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03459-JFK Document 30 Filed 05/21/2008 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03413-LAP Document 30 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 1 of 1
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 6719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2336]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Library of Medicine; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the PubMed Central National Advisory Committee.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: PubMed Central National Advisory Committee.
    Date: April 28, 2005.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: Review and analysis of systems.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 38, 2nd Floor, 
Board Room, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: David J. Lipman, MD, Director, Natl Ctr for 
Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, Department 
of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD 20894.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    In the interest of security, NIH has instituted stringent 
procedures for entrance into the building by non-government 
employees. Persons without a government I.D. will need to show a 
photo I.D. and sign-in at the security desk upon entering the 
building.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/about/nac.html, where an 
agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted 
when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 1, 2005.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-2336 Filed 2-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
Case 1:06-cv-15053-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### KENT v. HUMPHRIES

No. 125

Case below: 50 NC App 580

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 7 April 1981.
#### STATE v. BROGDEN

No. 215 PC.

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 118.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 29 August 1978.
Case 1:06-cv-15076-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15078-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15078-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15078-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15078-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15078-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15078-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15078-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15078-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15078-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15078-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15078-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15078-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15078-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 36 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 36 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### ROSE T. ROBERTS and husband JAMES ROBERTS v. DURHAM COUNTY HOSPITAL CORPORATION and JAMES E. DAVIS

No. 273PA82

(Filed 11 January 1983)

On discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 of the decision of the Court of Appeals, *Martin (Robert MJ, Judge,*with *Martin (Harry CJ, Judge,*and *Arnold, Judge,*concurring, reported at 56 Ñ.C. App. 533, 289 S.E. 2d 875 (1982), affirming judgment for defendants by *Herring, J.,*at the 6 April 1981 Civil Session of Durham Superior Court.

*McCain, Essen & Orcutt by Jeff Erick Essen and Grover C. McCain, Jr., for plaintiff appellants.*

*Young, Moore, Henderson & Alvis by Walter E. Brock, Jr., and Edward B. Clark, for defendant appellee James E. Davis.*

*Haywood, Denny & Miller by George W. Miller, Jr., and Michael W. Patrick, for defendant appellee Durham County Hospital Corporation.*

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

Justice Martin took no part in the decision of this case.
#### JOHNSON v. JOHNSON

No. 274 PC

Case below: 46 NC App 316

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 15 August 1980.
Case 1:06-cv-14854-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14854-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14854-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14854-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14854-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14854-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14854-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14854-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14854-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14854-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14854-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14854-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14854-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
#### HADDOCK v. SMITHSON

No. 31 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 228.

Petition by defendants Smithson and Moore-King-Sullivan for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 October 1976.
Exhibit 10.2

                               AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
                             FOUR OAKS FINCORP, INC.
                     EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE AND BONUS PLAN

         THIS  AMENDMENT NO. 1 of the Four Oaks  Fincorp,  Inc.  Employee  Stock
Purchase and Bonus Plan  (Amended and Restated  August 20, 2001) (the "Plan") is
effective as of September 1, 2009.

         WHEREAS, Four Oaks Fincorp, Inc. (the "Company") maintains the Plan;

         WHEREAS, after giving effect to prior stock splits, the Board of
Directors of the Company (the "Board") has reserved a total of 244,140 shares of
the Company's common stock for issuance under the Plan;

         WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is in the best interest of
the Company to increase the number of shares of common stock available for
issuance under the Plan by 100,000 shares; and

         WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13 of the Plan, the Board may make such
amendments to the Plan as it shall deem advisable.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows:

         1. The first sentence of Section 2 of the Plan shall be deleted in its
entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof:

         Subject to the  provisions of Paragraph 20 of the Plan, an aggregate of
         Three Hundred  Forty-Four  Thousand One Hundred Forty (344,140)  shares
         (the  "Shares") of the Holding  Company's  common stock,  par value one
         dollar  ($1.00) per share (the "Common  Stock"),  shall be reserved for
         issuance under the Plan.

         2. Except as herein amended, the terms and provisions of the Plan shall
remain in full force and effect as previously adopted.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hereby certifies that this
Amendment was duly adopted by the Board on June 22, 2009.

                                           FOUR OAKS FINCORP, INC.


                                           By: /s/ Wanda J. Blow
                                               -------------------------------
                                                 Wanda J. Blow, Secretary
#### MILLER v. CITY OF CHARLOTTE

No. 144 PC.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 584.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 25 August 1975.