United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

H.D., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, NAVAL 

DISTRICT WASHINGTON, WASHINGTON 

NAVY YARD, Washington, DC, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0944

Issued: January 10, 2024

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Mary Sue Hafner, Esq., for the appellant1

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

JURISDICTION

On June 23, 2023 appellant, through counsel, filed a timely appeal from an April 13, 2023 

merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Pursuant to the 

Federal Employees’ Compensation Act2(FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board 

has jurisdiction over the merits of this case.3

1

In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for legal 

or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). 

No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board. Id. An attorney or 

representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, subject to fine or 

imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also 18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of fees to a 

representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation.

2

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.

3 The Board notes that,following the April13, 2023 decision, OWCP received additional evidence. However, the 

Board’s Rules of Procedure provides: “The Board’s review of a case is limited to the evidence in the case record that 

was before OWCP at the time of its final decision. Evidence not before OWCP will not be considered by the Board 

for the first time on appeal.” 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c)(1). Thus, the Board is precluded from reviewing this additional 

evidence for the first time on appeal. Id.
2

ISSUES

The issues are: (1) whether OWCP properly determined that appellant received an 

overpayment of compensation in the amount of $25,443.56 during the period January 1, 2010

through September 10, 2022, for which he was without fault, as he concurrently received Social 

Security Administration (SSA) age-related retirement benefits and FECA wage-loss 

compensation, without an appropriate offset; (2) whether OWCP properly denied waiver of 

recovery of the overpayment; and (3) whether OWCP properly required recovery of the 

overpayment by deducting $690.00 from appellant’s continuing compensation payments every 28 

days.

FACTUAL HISTORY

On December 21, 1988 appellant, then a 42-year-old insulator, filed a traumatic injury 

claim (Form CA-1) alleging that on December 19, 1988 he injured his back when lifting a ladder 

while in the performance of duty. He stopped work on December 22, 1988. OWCP accepted the 

claim for displacement of lumbar intervertebral disc without myelopathy. The record reflects that,

commencing June 16, 2002, OWCP paid appellant wage-loss compensation on the periodic rolls.

The Office of Personnel Management Retirement Operations Center completed a form 

report on January 31, 2021 indicating that appellant’s retirement system coverage was under the 

Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS). 

On August 19, 2022 OWCP provided SSA with a FERS/SSA dual benefits form to obtain 

further information regarding appellant’s receipt of SSA age-related retirement benefits.

On August 30, 2022, SSA completed the dual benefits form, reporting appellant’s SSA 

age-related retirement benefit rates with a FERS offset and without a FERS offset from 

January 2010 through December 2021 as follows: beginning January 2010, the SSA rate with 

FERS was $1,010.40 and without FERS was $858.00; beginning December 2010, the SSA rate 

with FERS was $1,010.40 and without FERS was $858.00; beginning December 2011, the SSA 

rate with FERS was $1,045.90 and without FERS was $888.80; beginning December 2012, the 

SSA rate with FERS was $1,063.90 and without FERS was $903.90; beginning December 2013, 

the SSA rate with FERS was $1,079.90 and without FERS was $917.40; beginning 

December 2014, the SSA rate with FERS was $1,097.90 and without FERS was $932.90;

beginning December 2015, the SSA rate with FERS was $1,097.90 and without FERS was 

$932.90; beginning December 2016, the SSA rate with FERS was $1,101.00 and without FERS 

was $935.70; beginning December 2017, the SSA rate with FERS was $1,124.00 and without 

FERS was $954.40; beginning December 2018, the SSA rate with FERS was $1,154.50 and 

without FERS was $981.10; beginning December 2019, the SSA rate with FERS was $1,173.60 

and without FERS was $996.80; beginning December 2020, the SSA rate with FERS was 

$1,188.50 and without FERS was $1,009.70 and beginning December 2021, the SSA rate with 

FERS was $1,259.10 and without FERS was $1,069.20.

On September 30, 2022 OWCP prepared a FERS offset overpayment calculation 

worksheet, wherein it explained that, for the period January 1, 2010 through September 10, 2022, 

appellant received an overpayment in the total amount of $25,443.48. For the period January 1, 

2010 through November 30, 2011, appellant received an overpayment of $3,511,90; for the period 

December 1, 2011 through November 30, 2012, appellant received an overpayment of $1,895.56;
3

for the period December 1, 2012 through November 30, 2013, appellant received on overpayment 

of $1,925.27; for the period December 1, 2013 through November 30, 2014, appellant received an 

overpayment of $1,955.36; for the period December 1, 2014 through November 30, 2016, 

appellant received an overpayment of $3,976.32; for the period December 1, 2016 through 

November 30, 2017, appellant received an overpayment of $1,989.05; for the period December 1, 

2017 through November 30, 2018, appellant received an overpayment of $2,040.79; for the period 

December 1, 2018 through November 30, 2019, appellant received an overpayment of $2,086.52; 

for the period December 1, 2019 through November 30, 2020, appellant received an overpayment 

of $2,133.26; for the period December 1, 2020 through November 30, 2021, appellant received an 

overpayment of $2,151.49; and for the period December 1, 2021 through September 10, 2022, 

appellant received an overpayment of $1,777.96.

By letter dated September 30, 2022, OWCP advised appellant that, effective September 11, 

2022, his FECA wage-loss compensation would be offset by his SSA age-related retirement 

benefits, every 28 days, in the amount of $175.29. Appellant’s new net wage-loss compensation 

payment every 28 days would be $2,615.77. 

On March 8, 2023 OWCP issued a preliminary overpayment determination, finding an 

overpayment of compensation in the amount of $25,443.56 had been created for the period 

January 1, 2010 through September 10, 2022 because appellant concurrently received SSA agerelated retirement benefits and FECA wage-loss compensation without an appropriate offset. It 

found that he was without fault in the creation of the overpayment. OWCP requested that appellant 

submit a completed overpayment recovery questionnaire (Form OWCP-20) to determine a 

reasonable recovery method and advised him that he could request a waiver of the overpayment. 

It further requested that he provide financial documentation, including copies of income tax 

returns, bank account statements, bills, pay slips, and any other records to support h is reported 

income and expenses. Additionally, OWCP further provided an overpayment action request form 

and notified appellant that, within 30 days of the date of the letter, he could request a final decision 

based on the written evidence or a prerecoupment hearing. No response was received.

By decision dated April 13, 2023, OWCP finalized its preliminary overpayment 

determination that appellant had received an overpayment of compensation in the amount of 

$25,443.56 during the period January 1, 2010 through September 10, 2022 as he concurrently 

received SSA age-related retirement benefits and FECA wage-loss compensation without an 

appropriate offset. It found that he was without fault in the creation of the overpayment, but denied 

waiver of recovery of the overpayment. OWCP required recovery of the overpayment by 

deducting $690.00 from appellant’s continuing compensation payments every 28 days.

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 1

Section 8102 of FECA provides that the United States shall pay compensation for the 

disability of an employee resulting from personal injury sustained while in the performance of 

duty.4 Section 8116 limits the right of an employee to receive compensation. While an employee 

4

5 U.S.C. § 8102(a).
4

is receiving compensation, he or she may not receive salary, pay, or remuneration of any type from 

the United States.5

Section 10.421(d) of the implementing regulations requires that OWCP reduce the amount 

of compensation by the amount of SSA benefits that are attributable to federal service of the 

employee.6 FECA Bulletin No. 97-09 provides that FECA benefits have to be adjusted for the 

FERS portion of SSA benefits because the portion of the SSA age-related retirement benefit earned 

as a federal employee is part of the FERS retirement package, and the receipt of FECA benefits 

and federal retirement concurrently is a prohibited dual benefit. 7

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 1

The Board finds that OWCP properly determined that appellant received an overpayment 

of compensation in the amount of $25,443.56 during the period January 1, 2010 through 

September 10, 2022, for which he was without fault, as he concurrently received SSA age-related 

retirement benefits and FECA wage-loss compensation, without an appropriate offset.

As explained above, a claimant cannot concurrently receive FECA wage-loss 

compensation and SSA age-related retirement benefits attributable to federal service for the same 

period.8 The information provided by SSA on August 30, 2022 accurately indicated that appellant 

had received SSA age-related retirement benefits that were attributable to his own federal service 

while he remained in receipt of wage-loss compensation from OWCP’s periodic compensation 

rolls. Thus, the record establishes fact of the overpayment.9

To determine the amount of the overpayment, the portion of the SSA benefits that were 

attributable to federal service must be calculated. OWCP received documentation from SSA with 

respect to the specific amount of appellant’s SSA age-related retirement benefits that were 

attributable to his federal service. SSA provided its benefit rates with FERS and without FERS. 

The Board finds that OWCP properly determined the amount of the overpayment. It found that, 

since SSA benefits were paid monthly and FECA benefits were paid every 28 days, the monthly 

offset had to be adjusted to a 28-day payment cycle amount. OWCP provided its calculations for 

each relevant time period based on the SSA dual benefits form and properly calculated that the 

lack of offset from January 1, 2010 through September 10, 2022 resulted in an overpayment 

totaling $25,443.56. 

The Board has reviewed OWCP’s calculations and finds that it properly determined that 

appellant received prohibited dual benefits totaling $25,443.56 for the period January 1, 2010

through September 10, 2022.

5

Id. at § 8116.

6

20 C.F.R. § 10.421(d); see S.O., Docket No. 18-0254 (issued August 2, 2018); L.J., 59 ECAB 264 (2007).

7 FECA Bulletin No. 97-09 (issued February 3, 1997).

8 DW., Docket No. 23-0137 (issued June23, 2023); A.C., Docket No. 18-1550 (issued February 21, 2019); N.B., 

Docket No. 18-0795 (issued January 4, 2019). 

9

Id.
5

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 2

Section 8129 of FECA provides that an individual who is without fault in creating or 

accepting an overpayment is still subject to recovery of the overpayment unless adjustment or 

recovery would defeat the purpose of FECA or would be against equity and good conscience. 10 

The waiver or refusal to waive an overpayment of compensation by OWCP is a matter that rests 

within OWCP’s discretion pursuant to statutory guidelines.11

Recovery of an overpayment will defeat the purpose of FECA if such recovery would cause 

hardship to a currently or formerly entitled beneficiary because the beneficiary from whom OWCP 

seeks recovery needs substantially all of his or her current income, inc luding compensation 

benefits, to meet current ordinary and necessary living expenses, and the beneficiary’s assets do 

not exceed a specified amount as determined by OWCP. 12 An individual is deemed to need 

substantially all of his or her current income to meet current ordinary and necessary living expenses 

if monthly income does not exceed monthly expenses by more than $50.00. 13

Additionally, recovery of an overpayment is considered to be against equity and good 

conscience when an individual who received an overpayment would experience severe financial 

hardship in attempting to repay the debt or when an individual, in reliance on such payment or on 

notice that such payments would be made, gives up a valuable right or changes his or her position 

for the worse.14

OWCP’s regulations provide that the individual who received the overpayment is 

responsible for providing information about income, expenses, and assets as specified by OWCP. 

This information is needed to determine whether or not recovery of an overpayment would defeat 

the purpose of FECA or be against equity and good conscience. The information is also used to 

determine the repayment schedule, if necessary.15 Failure to submit the requested information 

within 30 days of the request shall result in a denial of waiver of recovery, and no further request 

for waiver shall be considered until the requested information is furnished. 16

10 5 U.S.C. § 8129; 20 C.F.R. §§ 10.433, 10.434, 10.436, and 10.437; A.F., Docket No. 19-0054 (issued 

June 12, 2019).

11 A.C., Docket No. 18-1550 (issued February 21, 2019); Robert Atchison, 41 ECAB 83, 87 (1989).

12 20 C.F.R. § 10.436(a)(b). For an individual with no eligible dependents the asset base is $6,200.00. The base 

increases to $10,300.00 for an individual with a spouse or one dependent, plus $1,200.00 for each additional 

dependent. Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 6 -- Debt Management, Final Overpayment Determinations, 

Chapter 6.400.4a(2) (September 2020).

13 N.J., Docket No. 19-1170 (issued January 10, 2020); M.A., Docket No. 18-1666 (issued April26, 2019); id. at 

Chapter 6.400.4.a(3).

14 20 C.F.R. § 10.437(a)-(b).

15 Id. at § 10.438(a); M.S., Docket No. 18-0740 (issued February 4, 2019).

16 Id. at § 10.438(b).
6

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 2

The Board finds that OWCP properly denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment.

As OWCP found appellant without fault in the creation of the overpayment, waiver of 

recovery of the overpayment must be considered, and repayment is still required unless adjustment 

or recovery of the overpayment would defeat the purpose of FECA or be against equity and good 

conscience.17 Appellant had the responsibility to provide financial information to OWCP, 18 but 

failed to do so.

In its preliminary overpayment determination, dated March 8, 2023, OWCP requested that 

appellant provide a completed Form OWCP-20 and supporting financial documentation, including 

income tax returns, bank account statements, bills, and cancelled checks, pay slips, and any other 

records to support his reported income and expenses. It afforded him 30 days to submit the 

necessary information. Appellant did not submit a Form OWCP-20 or otherwise submit the 

financial information necessary for OWCP to determine if recovery of the overpayment would 

defeat the purpose of FECA or be against equity and good conscience. Accordingly, as appellant 

has not submitted the information required under 20 C.F.R. § 10.438 of OWCP’s regulations to 

determine his eligibility for waiver, OWCP properly denied waiver of recovery of the 

overpayment.19

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 3

The Board’s jurisdiction over recovery of an overpayment is limited to reviewing those 

cases where OWCP seeks recovery from continuing compensation under FECA. 20

Section 10.441 of OWCP’s regulations provides that, when an overpayment of 

compensation has been made to an individual who is entitled to further payments, the individual 

shall refund to OWCP the amount of the overpayment as soon as the error is discovered or his or 

her attention is called to the same. If no refund is made, OWCP shall decrease later payments of 

compensation, taking into account the probable extent of future payments, the rate of 

compensation, the financial circumstances of the individual, and any other relevant factors so as 

to minimize hardship.21

When an individual fails to provide requested information regarding income, expenses, and 

assets, OWCP should follow minimum collection guidelines. The Federal (FECA) Procedure 

17 Id. at § 10.436.

18 Id. at § 10.438; S.P., Docket No. 19-1318 (issued July 31, 2020).

19 R.S., Docket No. 20-0624 (issued February 9, 2022); B.G., Docket No. 20-0541 (issued April28, 2021); G.G., 

Docket No. 19-0684 (issued December 23, 2019).

20 Id. at § 10.441; see M.P., Docket No. 18-0902 (issued October 16, 2018).

21 Id.
7

Manual provides that, in these instances, OWCP should set the rate of repayment at 25 percent of 

the 28-day net compensation amount until the balance of the overpayment is paid in full. 22

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 3

The Board finds that OWCP properly required recovery of the overpayment by deducting 

$690.00 from appellant’s continuing compensation payments every 28 days.

OWCP provided appellant a Form OWCP-20 with its March 8, 2023 preliminary 

overpayment determination. It afforded him the opportunity to provide appropriate financial 

information to OWCP. Appellant, however, did not complete the Form OWCP-20 or otherwise 

provide the necessary financial information to support his income and expenses prior to the final 

April 13, 2023 overpayment decision.23 The overpaid individual is responsible for providing 

information about income, expenses, and assets as specified by OWCP. 24 When an individual fails 

to provide requested financial information, OWCP should follow minimum collection guidelines 

designed to collect the debt promptly and in full.25 As appellant did not submit financial 

information as requested, the Board finds that OWCP reasonably required recovery by deducting 

$690.00 from his continuing compensation payments every 28 days.26

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that OWCP properly determined that appellant received an overpayment 

of compensation in the amount of $25,443.56 during the period January 1, 2010 through 

September 10, 2022, for which he was without fault, as he concurrently received SSA age-related 

retirement benefits and FECA wage-loss compensation, without an appropriate offset. The Board 

further finds that OWCP properly denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment and properly 

required recovery of the overpayment by deducting $690.00 from his continuing compensation 

payments every 28 days.

22 Supra note 12 at Chapter 6.500.8c(1) (September 2020).

23 See supra note 3.

24 20 C.F.R. § 10.438(a).

25 J.A., Docket No. 19-1946 (issued July 13, 2020); Frederick Arters, 53 ECAB 397 (2002); supra note 12 at 

Chapter 6.500.2 (September 2018).

26 E.K., Docket No. 18-0587 (issued October 1, 2018); S.B., Docket No. 16-1795 (issued March 2, 2017).
8

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the April 13, 2023 decision of the Office of Workers’

Compensation Programs is affirmed.

Issued: January 10, 2024

Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board