alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Steven T. Tamburo, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Riggs NationalCorporation; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrantand have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 

 

**Exhibit 31.2** (d)  Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Case 1:06-cv-15080-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Platinum Group Metals Ltd. of our report dated November 29, 2010 relating to the consolidated balance sheets as of August 31, 2010 and 2009 and related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years ended August 31, 2010 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2010 which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (signed)

|                                                                                               | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants
Vancouver, British Columbia
November 29, 2010 | 
|                                                                                               | 





















---
[J-11-2018] [MO: Dougherty, J.]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, 

BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL 

ENFORCEMENT,

Appellant

v.

JET-SET RESTAURANT, LLC,

Appellee

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 61 MAP 2017

Appeal from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court dated April 13, 

2017 at No. 575 CD 2016 Affirming 

the Order of the Berks County Court of 

Common Pleas, Civil Division, dated 

March 15, 2016, docketed March 16, 

2016, at No. 15-17486.

ARGUED: May 17, 2018

DISSENTING OPINION

JUSTICE MUNDY DECIDED: August 21, 2018

I join Justice Baer’s dissenting opinion in full. As Justice Baer notes, the 2003 

amendments added four additional instances of the word “frequent” to 47 P.S. § 4-

493(14). Utilizing the definition of “frequent” set forth in Appeal of Speranza, 206 A.2d 

292 (Pa. 1965) results in a nonsensical construction of the statute as fully discussed by

Justice Baer. See Dissenting Op. of Baer, J. at 5-7. I write separately to emphasize that 

a reading contrary to that outlined by the dissent results in a law that allows violations to 

occur on two occasions without penalty, before a citation is issued on the third occasion. 

Section 4-493(14) clearly intends to penalize licensed establishments for allowing

the admission of minors unless one of the enumerated exceptions applies. To interpret 

the Act otherwise is to ignore the directive that it be construed to accomplish its purpose: 

“protection of the welfare, health, peace and morals of the people of the Commonwealth.” 

47 P.S. § 1-104. 
[J-11-2018, 61 MAP 2017] [MO: Dougherty, J.] - 2

Further, the Speranza definition is impractical to implement as it requires a system 

for tallying and tracking infractions prior to issuing a citation. Instantly, the 

Commonwealth Court noted that “Jet-Set was cited for permitting a minor to be present 

in a licensed premises on two occasions in 2014.” Cmwlth Ct. Op. at 5. Because it was 

not Jet-Set’s third known instance of allowing minors to be present, the Commonwealth 

Court determined no violation of Section 4-493(13) had occurred and the citation was 

improper. In my view, it is unlikely that the General Assembly intended to condone 

allowing licensed premises to knowingly admit minors into their establishments unless 

one of the Section 4-493(13) exceptions was met. For the foregoing reasons, I 

respectfully dissent.

Justice Baer joins this dissenting opinion.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## 

# Pilot Accounted For From World War II (Hadfield, L.)

By DPAA Public Affairs

                WASHINGTON  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

James Wayne Walsh, Appellant

No. 06-15-00059-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 196th District Court of 

Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 28,919). 

Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief 

Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, James Wayne Walsh, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 10, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EXHIBIT 11.

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                 BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE                              SHARES
                 ------------------------                              ------

                 Basic shares outstanding at December 31, 1998        1,950,046

                      NET EARNINGS              $  766,045        $.39 per share
                 ------------------------       ----------
                 Basic shares outstanding        1,950,046


                 DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE                            SHARES
                 --------------------------                            ------

                 Basic shares outstanding at December 31, 1998        1,950,046
                 Stock Options-common stock equivalents                  98,690
                 Diluted shares outstanding at December 31, 1998      2,048,736

                      NET EARNINGS               $ 402,140        $.37 per share
                 ------------------------        ---------
                 Diluted shares outstanding      2,048,736
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER 

SITE LITIGATION 

 21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 

VIVIANA VERGARA, 06-CV-15116 (AKH) 

 

Plaintiff, 

 

-againstNOTICE OF DEFENDANT VERIZON 

NEW YORK INC.’S ADOPTION OF 

ANSWER TO MASTER COMPLAINT 

VERIZON NEW YORK INC., 

et al.

 

 

Defendants. 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant Verizon New York Inc. (“Verizon”) 

hereby adopts as its Answer in the instant case its Answer to Plaintiffs’ Master Complaint which 

was filed and served on October 16, 2007 in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower 

Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 102 (AKH). In accordance with Case Management 

Order No. 4, the allegations of the instant Check-Off Complaint are deemed to be denied. 

Verizon also incorporates by reference all averments and denials of its Answer to Plaintiffs’ 

Master Complaint as though same were more fully set forth herein at length. Verizon further 

adopts the responses contained in any Amended Answer filed and served herein. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Verizon reserves the right to file and 

serve an amended answer and specifically reserves the right to interpose cross-claims and thirdparty claims. 

WHEREFORE, Verizon demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned 

action as against Verizon, together with its cost and disbursements. 

Case 1:06-cv-15116-AKH Document 18 Filed 12/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
 2 

Dated: November 26, 2007 /s/ Eric F. Leon 

Eric F. Leon 

Lee Ann Stevenson 

Andrew Dunlap 

Michael D. Reisman 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

Citigroup Center 

153 East 53rd Street 

New York, New York 10022-4611 

Telephone: (212) 446-4800 

Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 

Attorneys for Defendant Verizon New York Inc.

TO: Christopher LoPalo, Esq. 

WORBY GRONER EDELMAN & NAPOLI BERN, LLP 

115 Broadway, 12th Floor 

New York, New York 10006 

 Robert A. Grochow, Esq. 

ROBERT A. GROCHOW, P.C. 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

 Gregory J. Cannata, Esq. 

LAW OFFICES OF GREGORY J. CANNATA 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs 

 Marc D. Weinblatt, Esq. 

SANDERS, SANDERS, BLOCK, WOYICK, VIENER & GROSSMAN, P.C. 

100 Herricks Road 

Mineola, New York 11501 

 David Kremen, Esq. 

OSHMAN & MIRISOLA, LLP 

42 Broadway, 10th Floor 

New York, NY 10004 

 

All Defense Counsel (via ECF)

Case 1:06-cv-15116-AKH Document 18 Filed 12/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. FREEMAN

No. 8P83.

Case below: 60 N.C. App. 216.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 28 January 1983.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Soldier Accounted For From Korean War (Yanez, F.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Case 1:07-cv-03384-JCF Document 15 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03384-JCF Document 15 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### FIGURE EIGHT v. LAING

No. 249 PC

Case below: 46 NC App 606

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 and alternative petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 15 August 1980.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00636-CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

v.

CYNTHIA D. CLARK

On Appeal from the

329th District Court of Wharton County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CV49332

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered. The 

Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment

denying Clark's petition for expunction. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 2, 2018
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20

- 0479

_________________ AMANDA R. SAYLER,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v. STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee. O R D E R

_________________ This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with Rules 11 and 12 of the Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the Appellant’s opening brief filed electronically on December 4, 2020 , this Court has determined that the brie f does not comply with the below

-referenced Rule s and must be resubmitted. M.R. App. P. 12 (1)(d) requires that the brief contain a statement of facts rele vant to the issues presented for review , with spe cific references to the pages or the parts of the record at which material facts appear. Appellant’s opening brief cites only to the three

page District Court order being appealed without reference to other materials in the record

. M.R. App. P. 12(1)(g) requires that the brief contain citations to the authorities, statute s, and pages of the record relied on in the argument. Appellant ’ s opening brief lacks citation s to quoted references throughout the argument section

. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the reference d brief is rejected. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (1 0) days of the date of this Order the Appellant shall electronically file with the Clerk of this Court a revised brief containing the revisions necessary to comply with the specified R ule [**s** ] and that the Appellant shall serve copies of the revised brief on all parties of record ; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes, additions , or deletions other than those specified in this Order may be made to the brief as originally file d; and 12/07/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0479IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained

in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised brief. The Clerk is directed to provide a true copy of this Order to the Appellant and to all parties of record.
DATED this 7 th day of December, 2020. For the Court,

By_______________

__________ Justice Dirk Sandefur

Electronically signed by: Dirk Sandefur Justice, Montana Supreme Court December 7 2020
----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| *“R.                Michael                Jones”                                                                        *R.                Michael JonesPresident,                Chief Executive Officer and DirectorNovember                29, 2007 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |

----