alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John Gamble v. Mary E. Gamble.

1. *Divorce—Alimony—When the Husband Must*Pay.—In marital litigation, apparently conducted on the part of the wife in good faith, the husband must provide, if he can, the means for her support and with which to litigate.

2. *Alimony—Ability to*Pay, *a Question of*Faet.—The ability of a defendant in a divorce proceeding to pay alimony is in the nature of a question of fact to be settled in the court below.

Memorandum.—Divorce and alimony. Error to and appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Samuel P. McConnell, Judge, presiding. Two cases. Heard in this court at the October term, 1894, and affirmed.

Opinion filed December 20, 1894.

McMurdy & Job, attorneys for plaintiff in error.

Mb. Justice Gaby

delivebed the opinion of the Ooubt.

March 27, 1894, Mary filed a bill for a divorce against John, alleging a marriage between them November 6,1890; *184birth of a daughter July 31, 1891, and still living; such conduct by him as entitles her to a divorce; parting from him, taking, the child with her. As to his ability to pay, there is some question, but we regard the opinion of the court below as settling it, at least to the very moderate extent required of him.

The marriage, birth of child, separation, and possession of the child by the wife, are not in dispute.

On this state of facts the court below, on the 23d day of April, 1894, entered an order that he pay $25 for her solicitor’s fees within thirty days, and $5 per week alimony, commencing five days thereafter. From that order he appealed to this court, filing his bond April 30, Í894.

Then, on the 14th of May, 1894, the court entered an order that he pay her $5 per week pending the appeal. The Harding case, 144 Ill. 588, has settled the question that in marital disputes, apparently conducted on the part of the wife in good faith, the husband must provide, if he can, the means for her support and Avith which to litigate. Whatever he has paid on the second order will, no doubt, be a satisfaction *pro tanto*of the first. The second order was authorized by Sec. 15, Ch. 40, Divorce. Both orders are affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40283
GUILLERMO MUNGIA, ERMINIA MUNGIA Plaintiffs-Appellants v. STATE FARM LLOYDS Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(02-CV-115)
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Guillermo and Erminia Mungia appeal from the district court’s ruling on summary judgment that their Texas homeowner’s policy does not provide coverage for mold damage to their dwelling that arises f rom an accidental discharge of water. The Mungias argue that the mold exclusion found in their policy is not applicable because ofan “exclusion repeal” provision. They rely on the Texas Supreme Court’s decision in Balandran v. Safeco Ins. Co. ofAm. , 972 S.W.2d 738 (Tex. 1998). We have recently addressed this identical issue, United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 28, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-40283

2 concluding that Balandran is inapplicable and that mold damage tothe dwelling is not covered under the policy language at issue here. See Carrizales v. State Farm Lloyds, 518 F.3d 343 (5th Cir. 2008). The Mungias’s arguments are thus foreclosed by our precedent. AFFIRMED.
## ***EXHIBIT 32.2***

 

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, As Adopted**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

 

 

**In connection with the Annual Report of Whitney Information Network,Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Ronald S. Simon, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

 

(1)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated:  June 2, 2004

 

 
|   |   |   |   |   | /s/Ronald S.  Simon             |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   |   |   | Name: Ronald  S. Simon          |   |
|   |   |   |   |   | Title: Chief  Financial Officer |   |

 

----
#### LAIL v. WOODS

No. 181 PC.

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 590.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 29 August 1978.
Case 1:06-cv-15000-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15000-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15000-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15000-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15000-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15000-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15000-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15000-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15000-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15000-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15000-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15000-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15000-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ADELBERTO OMAR SILVA

- ANGON,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 13

- 73123

Agency No. A075

- 121

- 249

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 9, 2019 **
San Francisco, California

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Adelberto Omar Silva

- Angon, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal and denial of his motion to

suppress. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 13 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

The BIA did not err in concluding that the evidence of Silva

- Angon’s alienage

that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) obtained during the raid of Sun

Valley Floral Farms was not obtained in violation of Sil va

- Angon ’ s constitutional

rights or any laws or regulations . Silva

- Angon was not entitled to advisement of his

rights under 8 C.F.R. § 287.3(c) because the raid, and the subsequent questioning at

McKinleyville Coast Guard Station (“McKinleyville Station ”) , took place well

before formal removal proceedings were commenced against him. See Samayoa

Martinez v. Holder , 558 F.3d 897, 901

– 02 (9th Cir. 2009). Nor does Silva

- Angon

present evidence compelling the conclusion that the administrative search warrant

p ursuant to which ICE conducted the raid egregiously violate d his Fourth

Amendment rights by improperly authorizing his arrest. See Orhorhaghe v. I.N.S.

,

38 F.3d 488, 493 (9th Cir. 1994); Int’l Molders and Allied Workers’ Local Union

No. 164 v. Nelson , 799 F.2d 547 , 552

– 53 (9th Cir. 1986) . Finally, Silva

- Angon

presents no evidence compelling the conclusion that conditions during the raid or at

McKinleyville Station were so coercive that Silva

- Angon’s “will was overborne

, ”

thus admitting the Form I

- 213 would not violate his Fifth Amendment rights. See

Ortiz v. Uribe , 671 F.3d 863, 869 (9th Cir. 2011) (citation omitted).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,358,506
<SECURITIES>                                   110,909
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,881,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                   150,000
<INVENTORY>                                    740,084
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,081,466
<PP&E>                                       6,063,792
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,241,419
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,107,478
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,998,821
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        12,281
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,937,500
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,923,802
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,107,478
<SALES>                                     12,326,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,469,179
<CGS>                                        8,930,681
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,709,262
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             128,970
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                630,947
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            622,747
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   622,747
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT TYRONE TERRY, DOC# 527778, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1120 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 1, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Salomon Smith Barney Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jennifer Magro
Jennifer Magro
Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
Chief Financial Officer and Director

March 28, 2008
Date

---
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1688 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the full disclosure 

of billing and service information to patients. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23 (legislative day, MAY 22), 2019 

Mr. ENZI (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 

and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for 

the full disclosure of billing and service information to 

patients. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PATIENT DISCLOSURES. 

4 Part P of title III of the Public Health Service Act 

5 (42 U.S.C. 280g et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 399V–7. PATIENT DISCLOSURES. 

8 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall require— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1688 IS

1 ‘‘(1) health care facilities and practitioners to 

2 provide to patients a list of services rendered during 

3 the visit to such facility or practitioner upon dis4 charge; and 

5 ‘‘(2) health care facilities and practitioners to 

6 send all bills to the patient within 30 business days. 

7 ‘‘(b) PAYMENT AFTER BILLING.—No patient may be 

8 required to pay a bill for health care services any earlier 

9 than 30 business days after receipt of a bill for such serv10 ices. 

11 ‘‘(c) EFFECT OF VIOLATION.— 

12 ‘‘(1) NOTIFICATION AND REFUND REQUIRE13 MENTS.—If a facility or practitioner bills a patient 

14 after the 30-business-day period described in sub15 section (a)(2), such facility or practitioner shall— 

16 ‘‘(A) report such bill to the Secretary; and 

17 ‘‘(B) refund the patient for the full 

18 amount paid in response to such bill with inter19 est, at a rate determined by the Secretary. 

20 ‘‘(2) CIVIL MONETARY PENALTIES.— 

21 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may 

22 impose civil monetary penalties of up to 

23 $10,000 a day on any facility or practitioner 

24 that submits more than 10 bills outside of the 

25 period described in subsection (a)(2), beginning 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 1688 IS

1 on the date on which such facility or practi2 tioner sends the tenth such bill. 

3 ‘‘(B) PROCEDURE.—The provisions of sec4 tion 1128A of the Social Security Act, other 

5 than subsections (a) and (b) and the first sen6 tence of subsection (c)(1) of such section, shall 

7 apply to civil money penalties under this sub8 section in the same manner as such provisions 

9 apply to a penalty or proceeding under section 

10 1128A of the Social Security Act.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 32(a)

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Joseph P. Keithley, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Keithley Instruments, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:



| |  | (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
ended June 30, 2003 which this certification accompanies fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.                                                                               

/s/ Joseph P. Keithley

Joseph P. Keithley
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2003

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Keithley
Instruments, Inc. and will be retained by Keithley Instruments, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## ***EXHIBIT 32.2***

 

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, As Adopted**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

 

 

**In connection with the Annual Report of Whitney Information Network,Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Ronald S. Simon, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

 

(1)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated:  March 29, 2004

 

 
|   |   |   |   |   | /s/Ronald S.  Simon             |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   |   |   | Name: Ronald  S. Simon          |   |
|   |   |   |   |   | Title: Chief  Financial Officer |   |

 

----
KEANE & MARLOWE, LLP

Attorneys for Defendants

REPINTER INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING

CO. S.A and MIACHART CORPORATION LLC

197Route 18 South Suite 3000

East Brunswick, New Jersey 08816

(732) 951-8300

Mary Ann C. Marlowe (MM-0723)

Christopher P. Keane (CPK-4394)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

x

DEVAL DENIZCILIK VE TICARET AS.,

Plaintiff, Rule 7.1 Certification

-against- 07 Civil 3397 (JGK)

REPINTER INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING

CO. S.A and MIACHART CORPORATION

LLC.,

ECF CASE

Defendants.

-- -- - -- - --- - -- - -- - - -- - -- - - -- - - --- - -- -- -- - - -- - - -- -- - - -- - - -- - x

Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 7.1 of the Local General Rules of this

Honorable Court, in order to enable the judges and magistrate judges of this Court to

evaluate possible disqualification or refusal, I, Mary Ann C. Marlowe, a member of the

Bar of this Court and a member of the firm of Keane & Marlowe, LLP, attorneys for

Defendants, REPINTER INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING CO. S.A and MIACHART

CORPORATION LLC., certify upon information and beliefthat said Defendants are not

publicly held corporations in the United States and that there are no corporate parents,

subsidiaries, or affiliates which are otherwise publicly held in the United States.

Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 5 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 1 of 2
Dated: New York, New York

May 22, 2007

TO: Freehill, Hogan & Mahar, LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Deval Shipping & Trading Co.

80 Pine Street

New York, New York 10005

Attn: Michael Unger, Esq. (MU 0045)

Lawrence Kahn, Esq (LK 5215)

KEANE & MARLOWE

Attorneys for Defendants

Repinter International Shipping Co. S.A.

Mary

S;;aa~ Ami C. Marlowe (MM 0723)

A Member of the Firm

197Route 18 South, Suite 3000

East Brunswick, New Jersey 08816

(732) 951-8300

300 Park Avenue - 17thFI

New York, New York 10022

Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 5 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Form 10-Q of Koss Corporation (the Company) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Koss, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ Michael J. KossMichael J. KossChief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial OfficerDate: May 17, 2004
 Note: This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed, except to the extent
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Page 19 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03389-RWS Document 4 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03389-RWS Document 4 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03389-RWS Document 4 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03389-RWS Document 4 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03389-RWS Document 4 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03389-RWS Document 4 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 6 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 29 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 29 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 2 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 29 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 3 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 29 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 4 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 29 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 5 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 29 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 6 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 29 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 7 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 29 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 8 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 29 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 9 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 29 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 10 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 29 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 11 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 29 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 12 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 29 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 13 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 29 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 14 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 29 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 15 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 29 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 16 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03363-GBD Document 29 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 17 of 17
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 224 (Tuesday, November 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 70637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23212]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agenda

Time and Date: 9:30 a.m., Tuesday, November 29, 2005.

Place: NTSB Board Room, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington DC 20594.

Status: The two items are open to the public

Matters to be Considered: 
    7710A Railroad Accident Report--Collision of Norfolk Southern 
Freight Train 192 with Standing Norfolk Southern Local Train P22 with 
Subsequent Hazardous Materials Release at Graniteville, South Carolina, 
January 6, 2005.
    7505A Safety Study--Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition 
(SCADA) in Liquid Pipelines

News Media Contact: Telephone: (202) 314-6100.
    Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact 
Christopher Bisett (202) 314-6305 by Friday, November 25, 2005.
    The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by 
accessing a link under ``News & Events'' on the NTSB home page at 
http://www.ntsb.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314--6410.

    Dated: November 15, 2005.
Vicky D'Onofrio,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-23212 Filed 11-18-05; 2:37 pm]
BILLING CODE 7533--01--M
Exhibit 10

Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 13-11 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
OIG-RR-00155

Case 1:07-cv-03378-GEL Document 13-11 Filed 07/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-15149-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1