alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered August 14 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 01317 - CV THE ESTATE OF MAX D. HOPPER, DECEASED On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1

Dallas Count y, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR - 11 - 03238 - 1



### O RDER By order dated July 23, 2019, we struck volumes 10, 12

- 15, 17

- 18, and 20 of the reporter’s record and ordered the court reporter to file, by August 12, 2019, corrected volumes incorporating into each of those volumes the contents of the video clips as identified by the parties in their stipulation. Before the Court is the request of Jackie Galindo, Official Court Reporter for Probate Court No. 1, for a two

- week extension of time to comply with this Court ’s July 23rd order. We GRANT the request and extend the time to August 26, 2019
. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Galindo and all parites. /s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.2
Section 302 Certifications

I, Scott R. Thompson, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on form 10-QSB of The X-Change
Corporation,

     2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
exchange act rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 for the registrant and have:

     a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

     a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
control which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

     6.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have indicated
in this quarterly  report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls  or  in  other  factors  that  could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation,
including any corrective  actions  with  regard  to significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses.

Date: May 20, 2006


/s/ Scott R. Thompson
______________________________
Scott R. Thompson, Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Case 1:07-cv-03251-JSR Document 12 Filed 12/19/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03251-JSR Document 12 Filed 12/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cr-00326-RWS Document 1 Filed 04/19/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cr-00326-RWS Document 1 Filed 04/19/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cr-00326-RWS Document 1 Filed 04/19/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cr-00326-RWS Document 1 Filed 04/19/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cr-00326-RWS Document 1 Filed 04/19/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cr-00326-RWS Document 1 Filed 04/19/2007 Page 6 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03354-SAS     Document 8      Filed 10/04/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03354-SAS     Document 8      Filed 10/04/2007     Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5331 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5331

 To revise the boundaries of John H. Chaffee Coastal Barrier Resources 
System Sachuest Point Unit RI-04P, Easton Beach Unit RI-05P, Almy Pond 
       Unit RI-06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI-07 in Rhode Island.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 2010

 Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To revise the boundaries of John H. Chaffee Coastal Barrier Resources 
System Sachuest Point Unit RI-04P, Easton Beach Unit RI-05P, Almy Pond 
       Unit RI-06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI-07 in Rhode Island.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES 
              SYSTEM MAP.

    (a) In General.--The map subtitled ``Sachuest Point Unit RI-04P, 
Easton Beach Unit RI-05P, Almy Pond Unit RI-06, Hazards Beach Unit RI-
07'', included in the set of maps entitled ``John H. Chafee Coastal 
Barrier Resources System'' referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal 
Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to certain John 
H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System units in Rhode Island, is 
hereby replaced by another map relating to the units entitled ``John H. 
Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System Sachuest Point Unit RI-04P, 
Easton Beach Unit RI-05P, Almy Pond Unit RI-06, and Hazards Beach Unit 
RI-07'' and dated September 30, 2009.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
replacement map referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for 
inspection in accordance with the provisions of section 4(b) of the 
Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 13-2 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 13-2 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 2 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 13-2 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 3 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 13-2 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 4 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 13-2 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 5 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 13-2 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 6 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 13-2 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 7 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 13-2 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 8 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 13-2 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 9 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 13-2 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 10 of 10
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                                KMART CORPORATION
                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Kmart
Corporation for the period ended July 31, 2002, I, James B. Adamson, Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Kmart Corporation, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         1. this Form 10-Q/A for the period ended July 31, 2002 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

         2. the information contained in this Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
July 31, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Kmart Corporation.


         Date:   January 14, 2003


    /s/ James B. Adamson
    -------------------------
    James B. Adamson
    Chairman of the Board and
    Chief Executive Officer
#### INVESTMENT CO. v. GREENE

No. 24PC

Case below: 48 N.C. App. 29

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 October 1980.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20166 Summary Calendar

ROGELIO MUNOZ, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus RAUL MORA, Correctional Officer III; CLYDE MORALES, Correctional Officer III, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CV-1482

-------------------- November 9, 2000 Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Rogelio Munoz (#585137) has appealed the jury verdict for the defendants in this civil rights action. Because the right to counsel does not apply in civil proceedings, this court will not review Munoz' claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv. , 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986). Munoz challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, arguing that the defendants presented perjurious and erroneous testimony. We review this issue for plain error. See United States ex rel.No. 00-20166 -2- Wallace v. Flintco, Inc. , 143 F.3d 955, 963-64 (5th Cir. 1998); Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(a). Because his argument turns on the credibility of a witness, Munoz cannot show plain error. See Flintco , 143 F.3d at 964. Munoz contends that he should have been provided with a free transcript and that counsel should have been appointed to represent him on appeal. Munoz failed to satisfy the standard for obtaining a free transcript. See Harvey v. Andrist , 754 F.2d 569, 571 (5th Cir. 1985). Munoz never requested appointment of counsel on appeal. To the extent that Munoz' argument may be construed liberally as moving this court for appointment of counsel, the motion is DENIED. See Cooper v. Sheriff, Lubbock County, Tex. , 929 F.2d 1078, 1084 (5th Cir. 1991). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v.

Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). We caution Munoz that once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
#### STATE v. EASTERLING

No. 143 PC.

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 155.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 14 July 1978.
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 24-2 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 24-2 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 2 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 24-2 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 3 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 24-2 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 4 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 24-2 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 5 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 24-2 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 6 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 24-2 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 7 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 24-2 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 8 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 24-2 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 9 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 24-2 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 10 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 24-2 Filed 06/06/2007 Page 11 of 11
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





This Certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report of Kreisler Manufacturing Corporation (the company) on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the report), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. To the best of my knowledge,
the undersigned, in my capacities as set forth below, hereby certifies that:





| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/     EDWARD L.
STERN



Date: November 14 , 2002Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 39      Filed 08/07/2008     Page 1 of 1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor RIOS-CASTILLO, also known as Ivan Castillo, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-11202.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided April 20, 2005.

Denise B. Williams, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Helen Miller Liggett, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Victor Rios-Castillo raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Katy Industries, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Amir Rosenthal, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/
      Amir Rosenthal


Amir
      Rosenthal


Chief
      Financial Officer


May
      10,
      2007











The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany this report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section
      18 of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company whether made before
      or
      after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
      such
      filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
      or
      other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
      signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
      written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
      and
      will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40283

GUILLERMO MUNGIA, ERMINIA MUNGIA

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

STATE FARM LLOYDS

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(02-CV-115)

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Guillermo and Erminia Mungia appeal from the district court’s ruling on

summary judgment that their Texas homeowner’s policy does not provide

coverage for mold damage to their dwelling that arises from an accidental

discharge of water. The Mungias argue that the mold exclusion found in their

policy is not applicable because of an “exclusion repeal” provision. They rely on

the Texas Supreme Court’s decision in Balandran v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am., 972

S.W.2d 738 (Tex. 1998). We have recently addressed this identical issue,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 28, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-40283

2

concluding that Balandran is inapplicable and that mold damage to the dwelling

is not covered under the policy language at issue here. See Carrizales v. State

Farm Lloyds, 518 F.3d 343 (5th Cir. 2008). The Mungias’s arguments are thus

foreclosed by our precedent.

AFFIRMED.
Case 1:06-cv-14866-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31.1



CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, Robert G. Berry, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Gameplan, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 26, 2008 |  | /s/ Robert G. Berry    
|                     |  | Robert G. Berry        
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Katy Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending
April 3, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, James W. Shaffer, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ James W.
Shaffer


James W.
Shaffer


Chief
Financial Officer


May 14,
2009











The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to
accompany this report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.