alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER 

LOWER MANHATTAN DISASTER 

SITE LITIGATION 

21MC102(AKH) 

KRZYSZTOF SZCZEPANSKI (AND WIFE, ANNA 

SZCZEPANSKI), 

Plaintiff(s), 

-against100 CHURCH LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

06CV15084(AKH) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby enters an appearance as counsel 

for Defendants 100 CHURCH LLC and ZAR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. n/k/a 

SAPIR REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP. in the above-captioned action and all future 

correspondence and papers filed or serviced in connection with the above-captioned action are to 

be directed to the undersigned. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 November 30, 2007 

Yours etc., 

HARRIS BEACH PLLC 

Attorneys for Defendant 

100 CHURCH LLC and ZAR REALTY 

MANAGEMENT CORP. n/k/a SAPIR 

REALTY MANAGEMENT CORP.

____________/s/________________

Stanley Goos, Esq. (SG-7062) 

100 Wall Street 

New York, NY 10005 

212 687-0100 

212 687-0659 (Fax) 

Case 1:06-cv-15084-AKH Document 6 Filed 11/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on November 30, 2007, I caused the following document 

to be electronically via the Court’s ECF system: 

1. Notice of Appearance (of Defendants 100 Church LLC and Zar Realty 

Management Corp. n/k/a Sapir Realty Management Corp.). 

The undersigned further certifies that on November 30, 2007, I caused the aforesaid 

documents to be served via First Class Mail upon the following: 

Paul Napoli, Esq. 

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern LLP 

115 Broadway, 12th Floor 

New York, New York 10006 

Robert A. Grochow, Esq. 

Robert A. Grochow, P.C. 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq. 

Law Offices of Gregory J. Cannata 

233 Broadway, 5th Floor 

New York, New York 10279 

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs 

James E. Tyrrell, Esq. 

Joseph Hopkins, Esq. 

Patton Boggs LLP 

1 Riverfront Plaza, 6th Floor 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

Thomas Egan, Esq. 

Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP 

One Liberty Plaza 

New York, New York 10006 

Liaison Counsel for the Defendants 

Dated: November 30, 2007 

 ___________/s/_______________

 Stanley Goos

Case 1:06-cv-15084-AKH Document 6 Filed 11/30/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-15062-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### ABRAHAM LINCOLN MABE, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM CLYDE GREEN, RUTH TEAGUE O’QUINN, and DANIEL HALFORD O’QUINN, Defendants.

(Filed 3 May, 1967.)

1. Automobiles §§ 85, 43—

Allegations *held*to show that sole proximate cause of accident was negligence of one defendant in making left turn across line of travel of second defendant.

2. Pleadings § 21.1—

Upon sustaining a demurrer for failure of the complaint to allege a cause of action, the action should not be dismissed until the pleader has had opportunity to amend. G.S. 1-131.

*277Appeal by plaintiff from *Johnston, J.,*October 24, 1966 Civil Session of Rajstdolph.

Action for personal injuries, heard on a demurrer to the complaint.

Except as quoted, the complaint is summarized as follows: On January 29, 1965, at 2:30 p.m., plaintiff was a passenger in the Chevrolet automobile owned and operated by defendant Green, who was traveling northwardly on U. S. Plighway No. 220, approaching its intersection with N. C. Highway No. 705. At the same time, defendant Ruth Teague O’Quinn, operating the Ford automobile belonging to her husband, defendant Daniel Halford O’Quinn, was also approaching this intersection. She was traveling south. As a result of the joint and concurring negligence of Green and Mrs. O’Quinn, the two cars collided in the intersection, and plaintiff was injured. Defendant Green was negligent in that he operated his Chevrolet carelessly and heedlessly in violation of G.S. 20-140, without keeping it under proper control, without keeping a proper lookout, and at an illegal rate of speed. Mrs. O’Quinn was negligent in these same respects and also in that:

“She violated G.S. 20-154 ... in that while proceeding southward she ¡turned across the right hand lane of traffic proceeding north and more particularly she turned immediately in front of the automobile being operated by William Clyde Green at an excessive rate of speed without first giving the •proper signal and ascertaining that such a left hand movement could be made in safety.”

When this case was called for trial, defendant Green demurred *ore tenus*to the complaint for that it alleges no facts constituting actionable negligence on his part and affirmatively discloses that the conduct of Mrs. O’Quinn was the sole proximate cause of the collision and plaintiff’s resulting injuries. Judge Johnston sustained the demurrer and entered an order dismissing the action as to defendant Green. Plaintiff appeals.

*Ottway Burton for plaintiff appellant.*

*Cooke & Cooke for William Clyde Green, defendant appellee.*

PER Cueiam.

The ruling of the court sustaining the demurrer is affirmed under the authority of *Hout v. Harvell, ante,*at 274, .... S.E. 2d ..... The court erred, however, in dismissing the action as to defendant Green. Plaintiff was entitled to move under G.S. 1-131 for leave to amend. The record shows no such motion and contains *278no order denying such .permission. In the event plaintiff' fails to apply for and to obtain leave to amend within the time allowed by G.S. 1-131, defendant Green will then be entitled to a judgment dismissing the action as to him.

Error and remanded.
#### STATE v. CLARK

No. 49 PC.

Case below: 21 N.C. App. 35.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 April 1974.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant application, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Mid-Career Investigator Award in Patient-Oriented Research.                    

*Date:*                         December 8, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 10 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Barbara A. Woynarowska, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 754, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 402-7172.                         *woynarowskab@niddk.nih.gov.*

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 14, 2005.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-22931  Filed 11-18-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### HARRIS v. GUYTON

No. 156 PC.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 434.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 27 January 1982.
#### IN THE MATTER OF JUDGE JOSEPH A. WILLIAMS, DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

No. 216PC

(Filed 30 September 1980)

Order

This cause is before the Supreme Court of North Carolina upon petition and allegations of the District Attorney, Eighteenth Prosecutorial District, said petition being labeled “Petition for Writ of Prohibition.” Judge Williams has responded to the petition and does not deny the allegations of fact. Therefore, the allegations of fact in the petition are taken as true.

From an analysis of approximately fifty to sixty cases brought to our attention by the District Attorney, it appears that Judge Williams has exceeded his authority and has failed to follow recognized practice and procedure in the disposition of criminal cases. His particular digressions in handling the various cases brought to our attention will not be detailed here. We find no evidence of moral misconduct on the part of Judge Williams. We must conclude on the record before us that Judge Williams, in disposing of most of the fifty to sixty cases detailed in the record, failed to follow applicable statutes, rules, customs or practices, and the actions taken by him were not within the Judge’s inherent or discretionary powers.

*225However, this Court has been variously assured that the digressions complained of by the District Attorney in his petition to us have been discontinued by all District Judges in the Eighteenth Judicial District and in particular that Judge Williams, who will leave office in December 1980, will not follow such procedures again. We have concluded, therefore, that the questions raised in the petition before us are moot.

IT IS ORDERED by this Court in Conference that the petition by the district attorney of the Eighteenth Prosecuto-rial District be and the same is hereby DISMISSED.

By Order of the Court in Conference this 30th day of September, 1980.

Carlton, J.

For the Court

The foregoing order is issued over my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court this 1st day of October, 1980.

John R. Morgan

Clerk of the Supreme Court of North Carolina
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5233] 

# AGENCY:

Department of State. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 [79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459], Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 [112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*], Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999 [64 FR 56014], Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999 [64 FR 57920], as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition, “Picasso to Plensa: A Century of Art from Spain,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign lenders. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Albuquerque Museum, Albuquerque, New Mexico, from on or about December 18, 2005, to on or about April 16, 2006, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, such as a list of exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, 202/453-8052, and the address is United States Department of State, SA-44, Room 700, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: November 15, 2005. 

C. Miller Crouch, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 05-23013 Filed 11-18-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-18-P
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 217 (Thursday, November 10, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 68476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22559]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-05-040]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

DATE AND TIME:  November 17, 2005 at 11 a.m.

PLACE:  Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS:  Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-340-E and H (Second Review) (Solid Urea From 
Russia and Ukraine)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently 
scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to 
the Secretary of Commerce on or before December 2, 2005.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: November 8, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-22559 Filed 11-8-05; 2:56 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Case 1:06-cv-15139-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### IN RE GREER

No. 187 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 106.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 9 July 1975.
Case 1:07-cv-03427-NRB Document 14-4 Filed 10/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03427-NRB Document 14-4 Filed 10/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 1 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 2 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 3 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 4 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 5 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 6 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 7 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 8 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 9 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 10 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 11 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 12 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 13 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 14 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 15 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 16 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 17 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 18 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 19 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 20 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 21 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 22 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 23 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 24 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 25 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 26 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 27 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 28 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 29 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 30 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 31 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 32 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 33 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 34 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 35 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 36 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 37 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 38 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 39 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 40 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 16-6 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 41 of 41
Case 1:07-cv-03427-NRB Document 15-5 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03427-NRB Document 15-5 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03427-NRB Document 15-5 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 2 

Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 39-3 Filed 08/08/2008 Page 1 of 2
Notice of Effectiveness

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Notice of Effectiveness

Effectiveness Date: November 15, 2006 3:00 P.M. 

Form: F-1

CIK: 0001365767

Company Name: Allot Communications Ltd.

File Number: 333-138313

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1365767/999999999506002366/xslEFFECTX01/primary_doc.xml8/6/2008 8:36:42 PM

Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 39-3 Filed 08/08/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-15144-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03403-HB Document 1 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03403-HB Document 1 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03403-HB Document 1 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03403-HB Document 1 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03403-HB Document 1 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 5 of 5
---

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification

I, Frank R. Hallam, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Platinum
Group Metals Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f))for the issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over
financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to
be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change
in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the
issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

---

(a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 21, 2011

/s/ Frank R.
HallamFrank R. Hallam Chief Financial Officer and Director

2

---