alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Marine Accounted For From World War II (Langan, J.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
**
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**THE TRUSTEE***

**OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Joshua R. Peterson, Vice President and Senior Trust Officer of Compass Bank, on behalf of Compass Bank, the Trustee of the San Juan Basin Royalty Trust (the “Trust”), not in its individual capacity butsolely as Trustee of the Trust, hereby certify that: 

 
 1.
The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (as explained in Note 3 to the Trust’s financial statements, in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 12:E, Financial Statements of Royalty Trusts, the Trust prepares itsfinancial statements in a manner that differs from generally accepted accounting principles; such presentation is customary to other royalty trusts); and 

 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theTrust. 

 

COMPASS BANK, AS TRUSTEE OF THE

SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
/s/ Joshua R. Peterson
By:
 
Joshua R. Peterson
 
Senior Vice President and Trust Officer

Date: March 18, 2019

 
*
The Trust has no executive officers. 
**
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 223 (Monday, November 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 70079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22932]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Gene Therapy Clinical Trial.
    Date: November 21, 2005.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Sheraton Gateway Hotel Los Angeles Airport, 6101 W 
Century Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90045.
    Contact Person: Samuel Rawlings, PhD, Chief, Scientific Review 
Branch, Division of Extramural Research, National Eye Institute, 
5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, MSC 9300, Bethesda, MD 20892-9300, 
301-451-2020.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.867, Vision 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: November 14, 2005.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-22932 Filed 11-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### HILTON GREEN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 10194

December 7, 1978

587 P.2d 38

*Morgan D. Harris,*Public Defender, and *Robert P. Dickerson,*Deputy Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellant.

*George E. Holt,*District Attorney, and *H. Leon Simon,*Chief Appellate Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

We are requested to set aside the appellant’s conviction for robbery and for the use of a deadly weapon in the commission *732of a crime. He asserts that the evidence of his guilt is insufficient; that evidence of another crime was improperly admitted; and that remarks of the prosecutor during argument were prejudicial.

1. His first contention, that of insufficient proof, is rejected summarily since the evidence clearly allowed the jury conclusion of guilt and presented a fact determination beyond our power to disturb. Nev. Const. art. 6, § 4; Washington v. State, 94 Nev. 181, 576 P.2d 1126 (1978).

2. Evidence of another robbery committed by the defendant-appellant the day before the robbery for which he was being tried was received, over objection, as relevant to prove identity. NRS 48.045(2). Proof of the other robbery was clear and convincing, thus satisfying the mandate of Tucker v. State, 82 Nev. 127, 412 P.2d 970 (1966). We cannot conclude that the court erred in receiving such evidence since the defendant’s primary defense was that of mistaken identity, and the State’s evidence to prove identity was not conclusive since two of the three eyewitnesses were unable positively to identify the accused. Consequently, it was permissible for the court to reason that the probative value of the evidence outweighed its prejudicial effect. Jones v. State, 85 Nev. 4, 448 P.2d 702 (1969); Bails v. State, 92 Nev. 95, 545 P.2d 1155 (1976).

3. During summation the prosecutor said: “What you just heard was the mistaken identity defense which is commonly referred to by the defense community as the so-d defense. It stands for somebody.............” Objection was interposed and sustained. The meaning of the so-d defense was never expressed. To assume that the innocuous statement, unexplained, was in some fashion prejudicial to the rights of the accused is an assumption we are unwilling to entertain.

Affirmed.
#### STATE v. BERGER

No. 214 PC.

Case below: 46 N.C. App. 348.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 June 1980. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 3 June 1980.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Recent News & Stories             
  -  News Releases             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.1 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET AND THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          14,840
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  113,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,017
<INVENTORY>                                    191,947
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               322,446
<PP&E>                                         173,126
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,848
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 462,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          130,812
<BONDS>                                        293,901
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,027
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   462,582
<SALES>                                        259,933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               259,933
<CGS>                                          187,928
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  187,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,285
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   286
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,028
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,053
<INCOME-TAX>                                       500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,553
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,553
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.5
 
 Amendment Agreement Borrower Holding Banks Agent
 W I T N E S S E T H
 FIFL
    Definitions
 Amendments
 The Loans
 Revolving Credit Loan Revolving Credit Loans provided that pro rata




---



##### 



Notice of Borrowing
  Notice of Borrowing
 Notice of Borrowing Borrowing Date provided that
 2




---



##### 



The Notes.
 The Notes
 Revolving Credit Note
   Mandatory Prepayments of Revolving Credit Loans
 less
 3




---



##### 



Rate of Interest
 Rate of Interest
 Interest Payment Dates
 Interest Payment Dates
 Obligations
 Obligations
 4




---



##### 



Conditions Precedent Amendment Effective Date
 Default etc
 Documents
   Proceedings and Documents
 Approvals and Consents
 Fees and Expenses
 Representations,Warranties and Covenants
  5




---



##### 



Agreement in Full Force and Effect as Amended
 Counterparts
 Governing Law
  6




---



##### 



FURMANITE LIMITEDBy:
    
    /s/ Howard C. WadsworthName:
Title:
    
    Howard C. Wadsworth
 DirectorFURMANITE WORLDWIDE, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Howard C. WadsworthName:
Title:
    
    Howard C. WadsworthVice PresidentFURMANITE INTERNATIONAL FINANCE LIMITEDBy:
    
    /s/ Howard C. WadsworthName:
Title:
    
    Howard C. Wadsworth
 DirectorBANK OF SCOTLAND, in its capacity as Agent and as a BankBy:Name:Title:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5


<LEGEND>                 THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
                         INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORT JAMES
                         CORPORATION'S SEPTEMBER 26, 1999,
                         FORM 10-Q FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
                         QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
                         SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<NAME>                   FORT JAMES CORPORATION
<CIK>                    0000053117
<MULTIPLIER>              1,000,000

<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-26-1999
<CASH>                                                 8
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        965
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                          819
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   1,924
<PP&E>                                             7,706
<DEPRECIATION>                                     3,456
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     7,276
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              1,548
<BONDS>                                            2,877
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                              22
<OTHER-SE>                                         1,329
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       7,276
<SALES>                                            5,127
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   5,127
<CGS>                                             (3,518)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     (4,456)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      19
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  (176)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      514
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (167)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  348
<DISCONTINUED>                                        (6)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      199
<CHANGES>                                            (22)
<NET-INCOME>                                         518
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       2.35


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cr-00351-DAB Document 1 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cr-00351-DAB Document 1 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cr-00351-DAB Document 1 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### STATE v. BOYD

No. 68.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 475.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 March 1974.
Case 1:06-cv-14998-AKH Document 9-2 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 D0 19 0 . ERMA J EAN W I LLI AMS et a l . v . AMERI C AN HOMES 4 RENT

PROPERTI ES EI GHT LLC.

In t h i s d is p os s es s o ry act i o n

, Am eri can Ho m es 4 Re n t P ro p ert ies Ei g h t

, LLC

fi led a m ot i o n t o co m

p el p ay m en t o f ren t i n to t h e reg i s t ry o f t h e co u rt

, wh ich t h e t ri al

co u rt g ran t ed o n No v em

b er 3 0, 2 0 1 5

. On Decem

ber 1 5

, 2 0 1 5

, t h e ap p l i can t s fi l ed t h i s

ap p li cat io n fo r d i s cret io n ary ap p eal

, arg u i n g t h at t h e s up eri o r co u rt erred wh en i t

g ran t ed a wri t of p o s s es s i o n an d co m p el l ed t he p ay m en t o f ren t. W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n.

Th e o n ly o rd er su b m i tt ed i n th e ap p l i cat i o n m a t e r i al s i s t h e o rd er g ran t i n g

Am eri can H o m e s 4 Ren t ’ s m o t i o n t o co m p el p ay m en t o f ren t an d p ro v i d i n g t h at a

wri t o f p o s s es s i o n wo u l d b e en t ered i n s t an t er s h o u l d t h e d efen d an ts fai l t o co m p l y

. As t o t hat o rd er, t h e ap p l i c at i o n i s un t i m el y

. Gen eral l y

, an ap p li cat i o n fo r

d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal m

u st b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s o f en t ry o f t he o rd er s o u g h t t o b e

ap p eal ed

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (d ). Bu t t h e u nd erl y in g s u b ject m at t e r of an ap p eal

co n tro l s o v er t h e rel i ef s o u g h t i n d et erm i ni n g t h e p ro p er ap p el l at e p ro ced u re. Reb i ch

v. Mi l es

, 2 64 Ga. 46 7

, 4 67 -4 68 (4 4 8 SE2 d 1 9 2 ) (1 9 9 4 ). O CGA § 44 -7 -5 6 p ro v i d es

t h at an ap p eal fro m an y

d i s p o s s es s o ry

ju d g m en t m

u s t b e fi l ed wi t h in s ev en d ay s o f

t h e d at e t h e ju d g m e n t w as en t ered

. See R ay M. W ri g h t, In c. v. Jo n es

, 2 3 9 Ga. Ap p.

5 2 1 (5 2 1 SE2 d 4 5 6 ) ( 1 9 9 9 ). Here, t h e ap p l i cat i o n was n ot fi l ed u n t i l 1 5 d ay s aft er

en t ry o f t h i s ord er. Acco rd i n g l y

, t h i s ap p l i cat i o n i s u n t i m el y

, an d it i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 01/07/2016 January 07, 2016
Case 7:07-cv-03324-SCR Document 11 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03324-SCR Document 11 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15** 

**- 1561** 

LEVI MBAWE MBONI ,
Petitioner
,

v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General ,
Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : December 15, 2015 Decided: December 21, 2015

Before DUNCAN and WYNN , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

John E. Gallagher, Catonsville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, John W. Blakeley, Assistant Director, Christina J. Martin
, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublish ed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Levi Mbawe Mboni, a native and citizen of Cameroon,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s

denial of Mboni ’s requests for asylum, withholding of removal,

and protection under the Convention Against Torture.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the

report describing the investigation conducted by the U.S.

Embassy’s Regional Security Office in Yao undé, Cameroon, the

affidavit submitted by Dairou Yaouba, and all other supporting

evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel

a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings,

see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and tha t substantial

evidence supports the Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias

–

Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Specifically, we reject

Mboni ’s claim that the agency unreasonably relied on the

investigative report and further conclude t hat consideration of

th e report was not fundamentally unfair. See Anim v. Mukasey
,
535 F.3d 243, 256 (4th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we deny the

petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In

re: Mboni (B.I.A. Apr. 28, 2015). *

* Before the Board, Mboni merely claimed that the immigration judge’s decision was “erroneous and contrary to the record and settled law” and “contrary to the Fourth Circuit (Continued)3 We dispense with oral argument bec ause the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIE D

decision in Anim v. Mukasey .” (J .A. 8). Although we have considered Mboni’s general claims on appeal, as addressed by the Board, we lack jurisdiction over many of the specific contentions raised in Mboni’s brief on the ground that he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (2012) ; Kporlor v. Holder , 597 F.3d 222, 226 (4th Cir. 2010).
#### INGRAM v. SMITH

No. 57 PC.

Case below: 16 N.C. App. 147.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 November 1972.