alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ferch’s License.

*Liquor law*— Wholesale *license*— Bottler’s *license*— Townships—Act *of July*30, 1897, *sec.*1, P. *L.*464.

The court of quarter sessions does not abuse its discretion by refusing an application for a wholesale liquor license in a township, where it appears, that, in addition to the ordinary business of a wholesaler of vinous, spirituous, malt and brewed liquors, the applicant intends to set up or conduct under cover of the same license an establishment in which the business of a bottler in all its branches is to be carried on.

Argued Oct. 25, 1904.

Appeal, No. 34, Oct. T., 1904, by Charles Ferch, from order of Q. S. Lebanon Co., Jan. T., 1904, No. 106, refusing a liquor license in re application of Charles Ferch for wholesale liquor license.

Before Rice, P. J., Beaver., Orlady, Smith, Porter, Morrison and Henderson, JJ.

Affirmed.

Petition for a wholesale liquor license.

Before Ehrgood, P. J.

From the record it appeared that the place for which the application was filed had been licensed for a number of years for the purpose of carrying on the business of a bottler. It was stated in the opinion of the court below that it was the intention of the applicant, if the license was granted, to carry on the *93business of a wholesale dealer, and also of a bottler under the same license.

January 17, 1905:

The court refused the license.

*JError assigned*was the order of the court.

*George B.*Woomer, for appellant,

cited: Donoghue’s License, 5 Pa. Superior Ct. 1; Berg’s Petition, 139 Pa. 354; Doberneck’s App., 1 Pa. Superior Ct. 637; Johnson’s License, 1 Dauphin County Rep. 40; Kiehl & Kieffer’s License, 15 Lane. Law Rev. 311.

No appearance entered nor paper-book filed for appellee.

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from an order refusing the application of the appellant for a wholesale liquor license in a township. The statute makes a distinction, as to the fee, between such a license and a bottler’s license; in townships, the fee for the latter being $125, and for the former $100: Act of July 30, 1897, sec. 1, P. L. 464. We cannot say that the court abused the discretion committed to it in taking this distinction into consideration, if it appeared, that, in addition to the ordinary business of a wholesaler of vinous, spirituous, malt and brewed liquors, the appellant intended to set up or conduct, under cover of the same license, an establishment in which the business of a bottler in all its branches was to be carried on; for which business the law requires payment of a larger fee than that imposed for the license for which he applied.

The proceedings being regular and no abuse of discretion being shown the order is affirmed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Recent News & Stories             
  -  News Releases             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.18 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 1 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 2 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 3 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 4 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 5 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 6 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 7 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 8 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 9 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 10 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 11 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 12 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 13 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 14 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 15 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 16 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 17 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 18 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 19 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 20 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 21 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 22 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 23 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 24 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 25 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 26 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 27 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 28 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 29 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 30 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 31 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 32 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 33 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 34 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 35 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 36 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 37 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 38 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 39 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 40 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 41 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 42 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 43 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 44 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 45 of 46
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 14-5 Filed 03/31/2008 Page 46 of 46
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1633 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit employers to pay 

higher wages to their employees. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23 (legislative day, MAY 22), 2019 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. CORNYN, and Mr. BARRASSO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit 

employers to pay higher wages to their employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rewarding Achieve5 ment and Incentivizing Successful Employees Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘RAISE Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF HIGHER WAGES. 

8 Section 9(a) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

9 U.S.C. 159(a)) is amended— 

10 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(a)’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1633 IS

1 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(2) Notwithstanding a labor organization’s exclusive 

3 representation of employees in a unit, or the terms and 

4 conditions of any collective bargaining contract or agree5 ment then in effect, nothing in either— 

6 ‘‘(A) paragraph (1) or (5) of section 8(a), or 

7 ‘‘(B) a collective bargaining contract or agree8 ment renewed or entered into after the date of en9 actment of the RAISE Act, 

10 shall prohibit an employer from paying an employee in the 

11 unit greater wages, pay, or other compensation for, or by 

12 reason of, his or her services as an employee of such em13 ployer, than provided for in such contract or agreement.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 23





The Board of Directors
HEI, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-33322, 33-46928, 33-46929, and 333-49489) on Form S-8 of HEI, Inc. of our
report dated October 12, 1998, relating to the balance sheet of HEI, Inc. as of
August 31, 1998 and for the year ended August 31, 1998, and the related
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
the year ended August 31, 1998, which report appears in the August 31, 1998,
annual report on Form 10-KSB of HEI, Inc.




                                   KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
November 25, 1998
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Hiram Cole, Appellant.

*People*v. *Cole,*173 App. Div. 956, appeal dismissed.

(Argued May 27, 1918;

decided June 4, 1918.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered April 19, 1916, which affirmed a judgment of the Steuben County Court rendered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of rape in the first degree.

The motion was made upon the ground of failure to file the return.

*Edwin S. Brown*for motion.

No one opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-58,097] 

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 7, 2005, in response to a petition filed by a State agency representative on behalf of workers of Agilent Technologies, Inc., Wireless Business Unit, a division of the Electronics Measurements Group, Loveland, Colorado. 

The petitioning group of workers is covered by a current certification (TA-W-57,742J) issued on September 30, 2005, applicable to all workers of Agilent Technologies, Inc., Electronics Measurement Group, Loveland, Colorado. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC this 20th day of October, 2005. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 05-22328 Filed 11-8-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 6 Filed 01/02/2008 Page 1 of 10Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 6 Filed 01/02/2008 Page 2 of 10Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 6 Filed 01/02/2008 Page 3 of 10Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 6 Filed 01/02/2008 Page 4 of 10Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 6 Filed 01/02/2008 Page 5 of 10Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 6 Filed 01/02/2008 Page 6 of 10Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 6 Filed 01/02/2008 Page 7 of 10Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 6 Filed 01/02/2008 Page 8 of 10Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 6 Filed 01/02/2008 Page 9 of 10Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 6 Filed 01/02/2008 Page 10 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 31 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 31 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 31 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 31 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 31 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 5 of 5
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 17-7      Filed 02/01/2005     Page 1 of 4

Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 17-7      Filed 02/01/2005     Page 2 of 4

Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 17-7      Filed 02/01/2005     Page 3 of 4

Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 17-7      Filed 02/01/2005     Page 4 of 4
#### FIRST CITIZENS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. NORMAN A. POWELL and wife, DONNA C. POWELL

No. 462PA82

(Filed 11 January 1983)

WE granted defendants’ petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 (1981) on 21 September 1982 to review the decision of the Court of Appeals. The decision of *Judge Arnold,*with which *Judges Hedrick*and *Wells*concurred, held the trial court did not abuse its discretion in striking defendants’ answer and entering default judgment against them. 58 N.C. App. 229, 292 S.E. 2d 731 (1982). In so doing the court affirmed the judgment of *Barefoot, Judge,*entered 30 July 1981 during the 27 July 1981 Term of Civil Superior Court, ONSLOW County.

*Ward and Smith, P.A., by Robert H. Shaw, III, for plaintiff*

*Fred W. Harrison for defendants.*

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          40,434
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,859
<INVENTORY>                                      9,577
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,192
<PP&E>                                          26,340
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,086
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,104
<BONDS>                                         67,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           847
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,357
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,882
<SALES>                                         72,834
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,834
<CGS>                                           45,834
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,363
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,613
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,613
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    174
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,439
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.39


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 2 1-0 14

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JACK WARREN MAXVILL, JR.

,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time,

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension

of time to and including March 2 , 202 2 , within which to prepare, file,

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 24 2022

01/24/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0014
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-18-00004-CV

IN RE DON HUTTO

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.1

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed January 24, 2018

[OT06]

 

1

In light of our disposition, we dismiss relator’s emergency motion to stay the orders of the 413th 

Judicial District Court as moot.
In re Hutto Page 2
#### STATE v. DEAS

No. 97 PC.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 294.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 June 1975.
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 1 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 2 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 3 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 4 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 5 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 6 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 7 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 8 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 9 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 10 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 11 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 12 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 13 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 14 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 15 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 16 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 17 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 18 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 19 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 20 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 21 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 22 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 23 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 24 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 25 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 26 of 27

Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 17      Filed 07/12/2007     Page 27 of 27
Case 1:07-cv-03321-PKC Document 5 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 3 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 39      Filed 04/27/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-14998-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
(32)    Item 32  Section 906 Certification.

KANSAS CITY
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

                                                          Third Quarter 2004

The undersigned certify
that the registrants Form 10-Q report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the registrant.

`/s/R. Philip Bixby           
R. Philip Bixby
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Vice Chairman of the Board




/s/Tracy W. Knapp            
Tracy W. Knapp
Senior Vice President, Finance`

Date:     November 5, 2004

A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Kansas City
Life Insurance Company and will be retained by Kansas City Life Insurance
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### TAYLOR v. DELIVERY SERVICE

No. 157 PC.

Case below: 45 N.C. App. 682.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 June 1980.
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 44 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 44 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 44 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 44 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 44 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 44 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 44 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 7 of 7