JERRY V. LEAPHART 

Attorney-at-Law 

8 WEST Street 

Suite 203 

DANBURY, CT 06810 

P-203-8256265 F-203-825-6256 

May 3, 2007 

Via Fedex and Facsimile

AFRL / DEO – PA 

3550 Aberdeen Avenue S.E. 

Kirtland Air Force Base, NM 87117-5776 

 Attn. Rich Garcia 

Dear Rich Garcia: 

This is in furtherance of the telephone conference between you, Dr. Judy Wood and I 

held on April 27th. That conversation was in response to Dr. Wood's letter to Ms. 

Susan Thornton, dated April 7th that you indicated had been passed to you for reply to 

Dr. Wood. 

The central query of the April 7th letter was whether or not certain demonstrated 

effects shown to exist in photographs of the destruction of the World Trade Center on 

11 September 2001 were consistent with directed energy weapons having been used? 

We acknowledged the startling nature of the inquiry. We did not expect an immediate 

answer; and, indeed, no immediate answer was given. 

In our thirty (30) minute conversation of April 27th, the issue was plainly left open with 

neither a definitive 'yes' nor definitive 'no' answer to the query having been given. 

Instead, the possibilities were discussed and left at that. 

Both Dr. Wood and I greatly appreciated the opportunity to discuss directed energy 

weaponry and their effects in conjunction with the theory that the World Trade Center 

complex (WTC) was destroyed, in whole or in part, by such weapons. 

The photographic, videographic, seismographic and atmospheric data all lend support 

to the hypothesis. Currently, Dr. Wood is assessing lethality information that is in the 

public domain. 

She is aware that ablation of steel, molecular dissociation and the creation of 

perpendicular holes, all as seen below, are consistent with DEW. 

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 58-3 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 1 of 15
STEEL-TO-DUST: 

Figure 1

2 

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 58-3 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 2 of 15
Figure 2

Figure 3

3 

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 58-3 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 3 of 15
Figure 4

Figure 5

4 

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 58-3 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 4 of 15
Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8

All the above (pgs. 2 – 5) depict steel being visibly turned to dust

5 

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 58-3 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 5 of 15
CRUMPLED BEAMS:

Figure 9

Figure 10

Figure 11

Each of the above depict crumpled beams 

6 

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 58-3 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 6 of 15
PERPENDICULAR CYLINDRICAL AND GEOMETRICAL HOLES:

Figure 12

Figure 13

7 

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 58-3 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 7 of 15
Figure 14

Figure 15

8 

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 58-3 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 8 of 15
Figure 16

All of the above (pgs 7 – 9) demonstrate perpendicular, regularized holes 

PAPER DID NOT BURN:

Figure 17

Unburned paper 

9 

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 58-3 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 9 of 15
INSTANTANEOUS PULVERIZATION OF STEEL OF CONCRETE AND MORE:

Figure 18 Utter annihilation, caused by DEW? 

Dr. Wood relies on information available at the website of and through publications of 

the Directed Energy Professional Society in support of the ablation and other effects 

mentioned above. 

Another way of assessing this matter is the timing of the destructive interval; <10 

seconds. This claim is supported in the first instance by the video of the event and by

the official governmental reports. What can be seen and what the reporting agencies 

have all uniformly concluded is that the destructive interval was approximately 10 

seconds for WTC2 and less than <9 seconds for WTC 1. As to the latter, the timing 

was faster than that of free-fall in a vacuum from the height of the tower. That is all but

inexplicable, absent directed energy weaponry because there were simply too many

completely undamaged floors for none of them to have created some resistance. 

Faster than free-fall in a vacuum is simply untenable. 

Below is the seismic data that Dr. Wood further relies on in confirmation of the timing 

issue: 

10 

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 58-3 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 10 of 15
SEISMIC DATA: 

Figure 19

Figure 20

11 

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 58-3 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 11 of 15
Figure 21

Eyewitnesses also report phenomena consistent with DEW; including, by way of

example, steel bars disappearing; and, more ominously, people disappearing. They

also report hearing sound that is frequently described (by multiple witnesses) as that 

of a high pitched "jet engine." They also experienced what was described alternatively

as high winds and/or hurricane force winds. 

The Space Shuttle sent back photographs showing the extent to which the process of 

destruction resulted in the creation of a very high plume of particulate matter that Dr. 

Wood refers to, colloquially, as "dustification," as seen here:

12 

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 58-3 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 12 of 15
DUSTIFICATION SEEN FROM SPACE SHUTTLE:

 

Figure 22

On behalf of Dr. Wood, I would appreciate an opportunity to present other of the rather 

voluminous data that Dr. Wood has compiled and/or invite you and appropriate 

representatives of the Air Force Research Lab, Directed Energy Directorate, to 'surf'

Dr. Wood's website where a significant portion of data has been compiled and laid out 

in explanatory categories. 

That website is:

http://janedoe0911.tripod.com 

Upon doing so, I think you and your colleagues may well wish to have further 

discussions with us. 

Respectfully, 

Jerry V. Leaphart 

13 

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 58-3 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 13 of 15
Epilogue:

Picture of Edna Cintron as she stood in the epicenter of where a jetliner is said to have

crashed into WTC 1: 

Figure 23

Figure 24

14 

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 58-3 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 14 of 15
Figure 25

The perpendicular holes are found in several buildings and in the streets.

15 

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 58-3 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 15 of 15