alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Jay A. Herman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of Delphax Technologies Inc. (theRegistrant);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;3. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  January 25, 2006 /s/ Jay A. Herman   Jay A. Herman   Acting Chief Financial Officer
Argued and submitted May 8, 1998;

resubmitted En Banc March 3,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration March 17, 1999

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Linda K. Holcomb, Claimant. LIBERTY NORTHWEST INSURANCE CORPORATION and Alexander Mfg., Inc., *Petitioners, v.*Linda K. HOLCOMB, *Respondent.*

(96-08941; CA A99402)

978 P2d 395

Alexander D. Libmann argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

Robert E. Nelson argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before Deits, Chief Judge, and Edmonds, De Muniz, Landau, Haselton, Armstrong, Linder, Wollheim, Kistler, Judges, and Warren, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration in light of *Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy,*159 Or App 44, 978 P2d 385 (1999).
#### TRUST CO. v. ARCHIVES

No. 47 PC.

Case below: 10 N.C. App. 619.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 10 June 1971.
Case 1:06-cv-14849-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15097-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          14,339
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  785,798
<ALLOWANCES>                                   658,000
<INVENTORY>                                      8,968
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               153,158
<PP&E>                                       1,217,655
<DEPRECIATION>                                 535,487
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 838,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          158,266
<BONDS>                                        334,067
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              320
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     332,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   838,879
<SALES>                                        618,483
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               625,399
<CGS>                                          727,094
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  727,094
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,958
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,858
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (149,511)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (55,768)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             93,743
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (93,743)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.95)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



---

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-19865, 33-51840, 33-51838, 333-59647 and 333-31062) of PharmaKinetics Laboratories, Inc. of our report dated July 26, 2002 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2002. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading (Selected Consolidated Financial Data) in the Registration Statement on Form 10-K.

|                              |  | 
|----------------------------- |  | 
|/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |  | 
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    |  | 
|                              |  | 

Baltimore, MarylandAugust 2, 2002
#### STATE v. CRAVEN

No. 388 PC

Case below: 47 NC App 585

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 September 1980.
EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-19865, 33-51840, 33-51838, 333-59647 and
333-31062) of PharmaKinetics Laboratories, Inc. of our report dated July 26,
2002, except for Note 14, as to which the date is November 13, 2002 relating to
the financial statements and financial statement schedule which appears in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2002. We also consent
to the reference to us under the heading (Selected Consolidated Financial Data)
in the Registration Statement on Form 10-K/A.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
-----------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
June 30, 2003
#### STATE v. VINSON

No. 205 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 638.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. - 7A-31 denied 23 August 1977. Appeal dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question 23 August 1977.
Exhibit 31(a)
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
I, Joseph P. Keithley, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Keithley Instruments, Inc.;
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;
 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, andreport financial information; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.    Date:February 9, 2005 /s/ Joseph P. Keithley     Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
exv10w2






FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 2007 PET DRX CORPORATION

STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN




RECITALS:




     WHEREAS, Pet DRx Corporation (the “Company”) established the 2007 Pet DRx Corporation Stock
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) effective January 4, 2008, in order to provide the Company with
flexibility to grant equity-based compensation to certain officers, employees, directors and
consultants for the purpose of giving them a proprietary interest in the Company and providing the
Company with a means to attract and retain key personnel;



     WHEREAS, Section 5.9 of the Plan provides that the board of directors of the Company may amend
the Plan at any time, subject to the approval of the Company’s stockholders where necessary;



     WHEREAS, the board of directors of the Company has authorized the amendment of the Plan to
increase the number of shares of the Company’s stock that are available for purchase under the Plan
by 2,500,000 shares, resulting in a total of 5,200,000 shares available under the Plan; and



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended by restating Section 2.2 of the Plan in its
entirety as follows, effective July 28, 2009:



     2.2. Stock Subject to the Plan.




     Subject to adjustment in accordance with Section 5.2, five million two hundred thousand
(5,200,000) shares of Stock (the “Maximum Plan Shares”) are hereby reserved exclusively for
issuance upon exercise, settlement, or payment pursuant to Stock Incentives, all or any of which
may be pursuant to any one or more Stock Incentive, including without limitation, Incentive Stock
Options. The shares of Stock attributable to the nonvested, unpaid, unexercised, unconverted or
otherwise unsettled portion of any Stock Incentive that is forfeited or cancelled or expires or
terminates for any reason without becoming vested, paid, exercised, converted or otherwise settled
and shares of stock deducted or withheld to satisfy tax withholding (other than shares of Stock
that are withheld from a Stock Award upon vesting) will again be available for purposes of the
Plan.


Except as otherwise set forth herein, all other terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain
in full force and effect.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to the 2007 Pet DRx Corporation Stock
Incentive Plan to be duly executed and delivered as of the 28th day of July, 2009.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	PET DRX CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Gene E. Burleson
 	 
	 	 	Gene E. Burleson 	 
	 	 	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 1 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 2 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 3 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 4 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 5 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 6 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 7 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 8 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 9 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 10 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 11 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 12 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 13 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 14 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 15 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 16 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 17 of 18
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 18 of 18
Case 1:07-cr-00349-DAB     Document 6      Filed 09/26/2007     Page 1 of 1
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Airman Accounted For From World War II (Petersen, A.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### STATE v. KISTLE

No. 690P82.

Case below: 59 N.C. App. 724.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 January 1983.
#### First National Bank of Albany, Respondent, *v.*General Construction Company, Appellant.

*First Nat. Bank of Albany*v. *General Construction Co.,*180 App. Div. 743, reversed.

(Submitted October 21, 1918;

decided November 12, 1918.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 21, 1918, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to set aside *661the service of the summons and complaint, also motion to dismiss said appeal. Plaintiff attempted to get jurisdiction of defendant, a foreign corporation, by service upon one Aderenti, claiming that he was a managing agent within the state of New York. The affidavits in support of the motion to set aside this service showed that Aderenti never was an officer or agent of the General Construction Company and that his only relations with said corporation were as assignee of the contract existing between the General Construction Company and the state of New York.

The following question was certified: “ Upon the facts, was the service of the summons invalid?”

*John C. Wait*and *Howard G. Wilson*for appellant.

*James F. Tracey*for respondent.

Order reversed and motion granted, with costs, and question certified answered in' the affirmative on the dissenting opinion of Woodward, J., at the Appellate Division. Motion to dismiss appeal denied.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback and McLaughlin, JJ. Not voting: Hogan, J. Absent: Crane, J. .
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (4.25 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### FORSYTH COUNTY v. BARNEYCASTLE

No. 144 PC.

Case below: 18 N.C. App. 513.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 August 1973.
Douglas

J. Relying in part on 

### Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 132 S. Ct. 1309 (2012), appellant argued that he had good cause because he was not appointed counsel in the first post-conviction proceedings. We conclude that this argument lacked merit. The appointment of counsel was discretionary in the first post-conviction proceedings, 

### see NRS 34.750(1), and appellant failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion or provide an explanation for why he could not raise this claim earlier. Further, this court has recently held that 

### Martinez does not apply to Nevada's statutory post-conviction procedures. 

### See Brown v. McDaniel, Nev. , P.3d(Adv. Op. No. 60, August 7, 2014). Thus, the failure to appoint postconviction counsel and the decision in 

### Martinez would not provide good cause for this late and successive petition. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Hardesty

cc: Holt Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge Roy H Philson Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2
(0) 1947A citeP