alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7799

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALEXIS ANTONIO GARCIA-RIVAS, a/k/a Alex A.

Garcia,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CR-95-101, CA-97-168-2)

Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 15, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alexis Antonio Garcia-Rivas, Appellant Pro Se. Timika Shafeek,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). Appellant's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Appellant that failure to

file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate

review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate

judge's recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review

by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. We

accordingly deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### WILLIAMS v. POWER & LIGHT CO.

No. 139 PC.

No. 52 (Fall Term).

Case below: 36 N.C. App. 146.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 14 July 1978.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 223 (Monday, November 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70110-70111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23012]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5232]


Shipping Coordinating Committee; Notice of Meetings

    The Working Group on Radio Communications and Search and Rescue of 
the Subcommittee on Safety of Life at Sea will conduct open meetings at 
9:30 a.m. on Thursday, December 8, 2005 at the Radio Technical 
Commission for Maritime Services, 1800 North Kent Street, Suite 1060, 
Arlington, VA 22209. The purpose of this meeting is to prepare for the 
Tenth Session of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) 
Subcommittee on Radiocommunications and Search and Rescue, which is 
scheduled for the week of March 6-10, 2006, at IMO headquarters in 
London, England.
    The primary matters to be considered are:

--Maritime Safety Information for GMDSS
--Development of a procedure for recognition of mobile satellite 
systems
--Large passenger ship safety
--Emergency radiocommunications, including false alerts and 
interference
--Issues related to maritime security
--Matters concerning Search and Rescue
--Developments in maritime radiocommunication systems and technology
--Planning for the 11th session of COMSAR

    Members of the public may attend these meetings up to the seating 
capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information or by 
writing: Mr. Russell S. Levin, U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, 
Commandant (CG-622), Room 6611, 2100 Second Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20593-0001, by calling: (202) 267-1389, or by sending Internet 
electronic mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#186a747d6e7176587b77757c6c366d6b7b7f36757174"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="51233d3427383f11323e3c35257f242232367f3c383d">[email protected]</span></a> and viewing http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/marcomms/imo/meetings.htm.


[[Page 70111]]


    Dated: November 10, 2005.
Clay Diamond,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 05-23012 Filed 11-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 1:06-cv-15125-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### Gurpreet Singh BRAR, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-74250.

Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 2005.**

Decided April 4, 2005.

Hardeep Singh Rai, George T. Heridis, Rai & Associates, PC, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, WWS-District Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Office of the District Counsel, Seattle, WA, Elizabeth J. Stevens, Jeffrey Charles Parker, Esq., DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before B. FLETCHER, TROTT and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM***

Gurpreet Singh Brar, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmation of the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and review for substantial evidence. *See Gonzalez-Hernandez v.**836*Ashcroft,*336 F.3d 995, 998 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.

The IJ provided an individualized analysis of Brar’s situation and rationally construed the country reports in the record, which state that conditions have improved in India for Sikhs and that persecution on account of political opinion has diminished. *See Gonzalez-Hernandez,*336 F.3d at 1000. Therefore, even taking Brar’s factual contentions as true, substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that changed country conditions indicate that Brar no longer has a well-founded fear of future persecution in India. *See id.*at 999-1000.

Because Brar does not meet the lower standard for asylum, it follows that he does not qualify for withholding of removal. *See id.*at 1001 fn. 5.

Finally, the IJ’s finding of changed country conditions also supports the denial of Brar’s CAT claim. *See El Himri v. Ashcroft,*378 F.3d 932, 938 (9th Cir.2004) (finding no CAT eligibility where most of the government violence against stateless Palestinians had ended).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### CLARY v. BOARD OF EDUCATION

No. 87 PC.

Case below: 19 N.C. App. 637.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 4 December 1973.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

# Funeral Announcement For USS Oklahoma Sailor Killed During World War II (Wilcox, G.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          95,379
<SECURITIES>                                    42,154
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,480
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,148
<INVENTORY>                                     31,760
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               230,921
<PP&E>                                          73,305
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 273,039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,622
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,761
<OTHER-SE>                                     225,897
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   273,039
<SALES>                                        281,135
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               281,135
<CGS>                                          208,546
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,398
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (4,596)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 814
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,973
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,512
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,461
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,063
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,524
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46


</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-15099-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15099-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15099-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15099-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15099-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15099-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15099-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15099-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15099-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15099-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15099-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15099-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15099-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
#### STATE v. MIDGETT

No. 14.

Case below: 8 N.C. App. 230.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal allowed and petition for stay of execution denied 24 June 1970.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement No. 33-15674 on Form S-3, Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to
Registration Statement No. 33-21565 on Form S-8, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1
to Registration Statement No. 33-30321 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No.
33-36887 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-52898 on Form S-8, Amendment
No. 2 to Registration Statement No. 33-52196 on Form S-3, Registration Statement
No. 333-11467 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-11469 on Form S-8
of American Pacific Corporation of our report dated November 19, 1996 appearing
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Pacific Corporation for the year
ended September 30, 1996.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche

Las Vegas, Nevada
December 18, 1996
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            10,537
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                            3,689
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                              3,813
<EQUITIES>                                       1,037
<MORTGAGE>                                       1,798
<REAL-ESTATE>                                       80
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  18,612
<CASH>                                              38
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               1,409
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           1,393
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,834
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 16,991
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                 48
<POLICY-OTHER>                                     181
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                              207
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    978
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              303
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           133
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,834
<PREMIUMS>                                         555
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                602
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  61
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     129
<BENEFITS>                                         686
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    337
<INCOME-TAX>                                       111
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                226
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       213
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.99
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        


</TABLE>
Certification of Funeral Expenses

Office of Workers' Compensation Programs 

Division of Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation

U.S. Department of Labor

The information provided on this form will be used to determine the amount of funeral expenses that are payable. Completion of the 

form is required to obtain payment for services performed (20 C.F.R. § 702.121.) The DOL makes no assurances of confidentiality to 

respondents. As a practical matter, the DOL would only disclose information collected under these requests in accordance with the 

provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552; the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a; and related regulations, 29 C.F.R. 

parts 70, 71.

OMB No. 1240-0040 

Expires: 11/30/2026

3. Name of deceased

2. Carrier's No.

1. OWCP No.

4. Funeral Director (Name, address, ZIP code)

5. Services Performed

(itemize below and enter costs)

Total Bill $

Amount Paid $

Amount Due $

Comments

(If additional space is required continue on reverse)

6. I was informed Enter name, address, and relationship to deceased.

that the above

bill would be

paid by

Enter name, address, and relationship to deceased. 7. This amount,

$ , of the

bill was paid by

Certification

I certify that this company performed the above services and that no further part of this bill has been paid.

It is therefore requested that payment, in accordance with the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act or

its extensions, be paid for the services indicated above.

8. Signature and title (Type and sign) Phone Number 9. Date signed

Please be sure to include the OWCP Case Number and mail this form to the OWCP/DLHWC Central Mail Receipt site at the following address: U.S. Department 

of Labor Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Division of Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation 400 West Bay Street, Suite 63A, Box 28 

Jacksonville, FL 32202. Or upload the claim directly to the case file using the Secure Electronic Access Portal (SEAPortal). Access the SEAPortal directly at: 

https://seaportal.dol.gov/portal/

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a a valid OMB 

control number. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including time for reviewing 

instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Use of this 

form is optional, however furnishing the information is required in order to obtain and/or retain benefits (20CFR 702.121). Send comments regarding the burden 

estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, N.W., Room S-3229, Washington, D.C. 20210, and reference the OMB Control Number. DO NOT SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS OFFICE.

Public Burden Statement

Form LS-265

Rev. August 2020
Case 1:07-cv-03356-PKC Document 2 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15101-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Order entered February 26, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 19 - 01589 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF E .W.M., A CHILD On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Col lin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219 - 53699 - 2018

ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s February 23, 2020 first motion for extension of time to file his brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than March 2 7 , 2020. We note appellant’s motion does not include the required certificate of conference. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 10. 1 ( a ) (5)

. We caution appellant that all further motions shall include the certificate. /s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
1 TheHonorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri, sitting by designation.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-3136

___________ In re Craig Petersen, * * Debtor. * *

____________________________ * * * James Edward Bachman, * * Appeal from the United States Appellant, * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel * for the United States Court of v. * Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. * Joel Pelofsky, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: May 18, 2001 Filed: July 13, 2001

___________ BeforeMORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD and BYE, Circuit Judges, and GAITAN, 1 District Judge.

___________ PER CURIAM.2 The Honorable John C. Minahan, Jr., United States Bankruptcy Judge for the

District of Nebraska. -2- James Edward Bachman, Esq., appeals from the order of the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirming the bankruptcy court's 2 award of attorney's fees to Mr. Bachman in an amount less than he requested. Mr. Bachman argues that the panel erredin holding that there was no error of law or fact in the bankruptcy court's fee award and that in rejecting his claim the bankruptcy court denied him due process. Having carefully considered the matter, we conclude that an extended discussion of the matter is unnecessary and that there was no error in the panel's holding. We therefore affirm on the basis of the panel's well-reasoned opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 34-5 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 1 of 1