alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement  No.  33-15674  on  Form  S-3,  Post-  Effective  Amendment  No.  2 to
Registration Statement No, 33-21565 on Form S-8, Post-Effective  Amendment No. 1
to Registration  Statement No. 33-30321 on Form S-8, Registration  Statement No.
33-36887  on  Form  S-8,  Registration  Statement  No.  33-52898  on  Form  S-8,
Registration Statement No. 33-53898 on Form S-8, Amendment No. 2 to Registration
Statement No. 33-52196 on Form S-3, Registration  Statement No. 33-11467 on Form
S-3 and  Registration  Statement No.  333-11469 on Form S-8 of American  Pacific
Corporation  of our report dated  November  14,  1997,  appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A  Amendment No. 2 of American  Pacific  Corporation for the
year ended September 30, 1997.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
June 11, 1998
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Raymond LUNA, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-10339.

D.C. No. CR-03-00105-ECR/RAM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Feb. 14, 2005.

Decided March 7, 2005.

Sue P. Fahami, U.S. Attorney Office, Reno, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael K. Powell, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Reno, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before D.W. NELSON, W. FLETCHER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*135MEMORANDUM*

Raymond Luna pled guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2), felon in possession of an illegal firearm. He appeals the calculation of the base offense level, arguing that the district court erroneously counted a prior conviction under California Penal Code §§ 182 and 245(a)(2) as a “prior felony conviction,” when calculating the base offense level under the Sentencing Guidelines. *See*U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) (2003). We conclude that the district court properly calculated the base offense level, but vacate the sentence on other grounds and remand for resentencing.

Luna’s prior conviction was an adult conviction for more than one year and one month and therefore was appropriately considered by the district court. U.S.S.G. §§ 2K2.1, cmt. n. 15; 4Al.l(a); 4A1.2(d) (2003). Although Luna was a minor when he was previously convicted, he was sentenced as an adult to two years in state prison. The judge allowed him to serve that sentence in the custody of the California Youth Authority, noting on the Abstract of Judgment that Luna was “to be housed at C.Y.A. per Section 1731.5(e)W.I.C.” *See*Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 1731.5(c) (providing that a court may order a person under 18 years old to be “transferred to the custody of the Youth Authority ... solely for purposes of housing the inmate” who remains “committed to the Department of Corrections”). Because Luna was not “committed” to the Youth Authority, neither of the California statutory provisions relating to the special treatment of offenders subsequent to Youth Authority commitments applies. *See*Cal.Penal Code. § 17(c); Cal. Welf. & Inst.Code § 1737. The sentence pronounced, not the time actually served, determines the length of a prior sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines. *See United States v. Carrillo,*991 F.2d 590, 593 (9th Cir.1993). Luna’s parole does not alter his original sentence of two years in prison.

We vacate Luna’s sentence and remand for discretionary reconsideration of the sentence in light of *United States v. Boo*ker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 769, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005); and *United States v. Ameline,*400 F.3d 646 (9th Cir.2005).

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### WING v. TRUST CO.

No. 78 PC.

Case below: 35 N.C. App. 346.

Petitions by plaintiffs and defendant Alex B. Andrews III for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 May 1978.
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 12 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 12 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 1 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 2 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 3 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 4 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 5 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 6 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 7 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 8 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 9 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 10 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 11 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 12 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 13 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 14 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 15 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 16 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 17 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 18 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 19 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 20 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 21 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 22 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 23 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 24 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 25 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 26 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 27 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 28 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 29 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 30 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 31 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 32 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 33 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 34 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-2 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 35 of 35
#### Yolanda MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PERSONAL-TOUCH OF VIRGINIA, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-1124.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 31, 2005.

Before MAYER, RADER, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

Personal Touch of Virginia, Inc. moves to “strike” Yolanda Miller’s notice of appeal. We consider whether Miller’s appeal should be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Miller appealed from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granting Personal-Touch of Virginia’s motion for summary judgment. *Miller v. Personal-Touch of Virginia, Inc.,*No. 2:04cv110 (E.D.Va. Nov. 2, 2004). It appears that the underlying matter involved the Family Medical Leave Act and is not within this court’s limited jurisdiction. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1295.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Personal Touch’s motion is denied.

(2) The appeal is transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**RONALD OCKIMEY,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 230 EAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 11th day of October, 2016, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Housing Finance Board

      ( print page 6006)    

# Time and Date:

The open meeting of the Board of Directors is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, February 9, 2005. The closed portion of the meeting will follow immediately the open portion of the meeting. 

# Place:

Board Room, Second Floor, Federal Housing Finance Board, 1777 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006. 

# Status:

The first portion of the meeting will be open to the public. The final portion of the meeting will be closed to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered at the Open Portion of the Meeting: 

*Capital Plan Amendment for the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas.*

*Final Rule Updating the Minority Contractors Outreach Program.*

*Proposed Rule Establishing a Data Directive Manual (DDM).*

# Matter to be Considered at the Closed Portion of the Meeting: 

*Periodic Update of Examination Program Development and Supervisory Findings.*

# Contact Person for More Information:

                        Shelia Willis, Paralegal Specialist, Office of General Counsel, at (202) 408-2876 or                         *williss@fhfb.gov.*

Dated: February 2, 2005. 

By the Federal Housing Finance Board. 

Mark J. Tenhundfeld, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 05-2311 Filed 2-2-05; 3:11 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
Case 1:06-cv-15126-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15126-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15126-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15126-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15126-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15126-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15126-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15126-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15126-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15126-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15126-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15126-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15126-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,530,631
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,222,358
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                         132,422,398
<DEPRECIATION>                                  89,791,443
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,490,380
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,490,380
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,375,950
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,756,992
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,261,110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    611,700
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,467,421
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        



</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cr-00353-PKC Document 130 Filed 09/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-14852-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15041-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 19-7 Filed 10/24/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS Document 19-7 Filed 10/24/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, J. David Berkley, the President of Sterion Incorporated (the Company) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Companys Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    J. David Berkley

Title:  President, Sterion Incorporated

Dated:  January 7, 2002



I, Mark Buckrey, the Chief Financial Officer of Sterion Incorporated (the Company) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that the Company s Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    Mark Buckrey

Title:  Chief Financial Officer, Sterion Incorporated

Dated:  January 7, 2002
#### STATE v. CREECH

No. 348 PC

Case below: 47 NC App 207

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 16 September 1980.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 224 (Tuesday, November 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 70580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23063]



[[Page 70580]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Plumas County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC)

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Plumas County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will hold 
a meeting on December 2, 2005, in Quincy, CA. The primary purpose of 
the meeting is to review, discuss and refine Cycle 6 timelines and 
application materials, view a presentation on national RAC survey 
findings and consider recommending the Corridor Fuelbreak project to 
the Plumas National Forest Supervisor for funding approval.

DATES & ADDRESSES: The December 2, 2005 meeting will take place from 9-
12 at the Mineral Building-Plumas/Sierra County Fairgrounds, 208 
Fairgrounds Road, Quincy, CA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lee Anne Schramel Taylor, Forest 
Coordinator, USDA, Plumas National Forest, P.O. Box 11500/159 Lawrence 
Street, Quincy, CA 95971; (530) 283-7850; or by e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94f1f5e0f5edf8fbe6d4f2e7baf2f1f0bae1e7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="086d697c697164677a486e7b266e6d6c267d7b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda items for the December 2 meeting 
include: (1) Forest Service Update; (2) Review, discuss, and refine 
Cycle 6 timelines and application materials; (3) Review Corridor 
project, discuss, and make a recommendation; (4) Presentation: national 
RAC survey findings; and (5) Future meeting schedule and agenda. The 
meetings are open to the public and individuals may address the 
Committee after being recognized by the Chair. Other RAC information 
including previous meeting agendas and minutes may be obtained at 
http://wwwnotes.fs.fed.us:81/r4/payments_to_states.

    Dated: November 14, 2005.
Robert G. Macwhorter,
Deputy Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 05-23063 Filed 11-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
U.S. Department of Labor 

March 12, 1991 

Employment Standards Administration 

Office of Workers' Compensation Programs 

Division of '....ongshcre and 

Harbor Workers' Compensation 

Washingloo, D.C. 20210 

Notice No. 71 

NOTICE TO INSURANCE CARRIERS, SELF-INSURED EMPLOYERS UNDER THE 

LONGSHORE AND HARBOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION ACT, AND OTHER 

INTERESTED PERSONS 

SUBJECT: Application of the Longshore Act to the Virgin Islands 

The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in 

denying the petition for rehearing in Peter v. Hess Oil Virgin 

Islands Corp., 903 F.2d 935, .uw, • .illill• 910 F.2d 1179, 1180 n.2 

(3d Cir. 1990), ~ . .illl..(l. January 22, 1991 (59 U.S.L.W. 3500), 

recommended that the Department of Labor clarify its position 

concerning the application of the Longshore Act to the Virgin 

Islands. 

Upon further review of the statutory language set forth in 

sections 2(9) and 3(a) of the Longshore Act, the Office has 

determined that the Act does apply in the Virgin Islands. This 

conclusion is based on the plain language of the Act which covers 

disabilities and deaths resulting from injuries on the navigable 

waters of the United States and in certain adjoining shoreside 

areas. As noted by the Third Circuit the navigable waters of the 

United States includes navigable waters of its territories such 

as the Virgin Islands. 

This notice is intended to advise all interested parties of the 

Department's policy regarding this issue and to notify covered 

employers in the Virgin Islands of the obligation to secure their 

compensation liability as required by sections 4 and 32 of the 

Longshore Act. The Department has also issued a program directive to all district offices setting forth the Department's 

position and expressly rescinding LS/HW Program Memorandum No. 24 

zz:~,~~ 

/

Dir ctor, Division of 

Longshore and Harbor , Workers' Compensation f
0- , . . . , . . ,. .. . . . . . .. -.-.--- --..-...,-. _ . ---- ----.----- -"---dx 

j i:Sii\.<: SDNY "1 

1 fig (;l,!y$f<r 1 i l i 

I EI~~yg;tr.:.;e,~;,.~y F~I,;~D 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -A;..--.- 

IN RE: 

: MASTER i:11,E 

FOSAMAX PRODUCTS LIABII,ITY LITIGATION 

I I :06-MD-I 789 (JFK) 

This Document Relates 7b .4N ilctions 

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE ON ORAL MOTION 

Upon the oral motion of William .I. Beausolcil, attorney for defendant Merck &: Co., Inc., and 

said sponsor attorney's declaration that applicant James M. Doran, Jr. is a member in good 

standing of the bar of the United States District Court for the MiddIe District of Tennessee; 

and that applicant's contact information is as follows: 

Applicant's Name: James M. Doran, Jr. 

Firm Namc: Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis 

Addrcss: Nashville City Center, 51 1 Union Strcet, Suite 2700 

CityIStatclZip: Nashville. Tenncssee 372 19 

TeicphoneIFax: (6 15) 850-8843/(615) 244-6804 

Email Address: jim.doran@,wallerlaw.com 

said applicant having requested admission pro hac vice to appcar for all purposes as counsel for 

Merck & Co., Inc. in the above entitled action: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that James M. Doran, Jr, is admitted to practice pro hac vice in the 

above captioned case in the United States District Court fbr the Southern District of New York. 

All attorneys appearing before this Court are suhject to the Local Rules of this Court, including 

thc Rulcs governing discipline of attomcys. If this action is assigned to thc Electronic Case 

Filing (ECF) system, counscl shall immediately apply for an ECF password at 

Case 1:07-cv-03296-JFK Document 3 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 1 of 3
2 

\v\\w.n~~sd.uscourisb~o~~. Counsel shall immediately forward the pro hac vice fee to the Clerk of 

the Court. 

Dated: June 212007 

New York, New York 

--- 

-united States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03296-JFK Document 3 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 2 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DlSTRICT OF TENNESSEE 

CERTlFlCATE OF GOOD STANDlNG 

1. KEITH THROCKMORTON. Clerk ofthe llnited Stalcs District Court for the 

Middle District of'l'enncssee. do herebq certilicd that .JAMES M. DOHAN was duly 

admitted to practice in said Court on April 10, 1970, and is in good standing as a member 

of thc bar ofsaid Court. 

Dated at Nashville. 'l'enncssee on May 29, 2007 

KI;I'TI~I THKOCKMORTON, CI,EIU -- Deputy CI 

Case 1:07-cv-03296-JFK Document 3 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                    JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                              5,033,986
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                       2,177,383
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                         2,282,479
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   10,213,085
<PP&E>                              3,698,660
<DEPRECIATION>                      3,088,442
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     11,825,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               2,056,003
<BONDS>                                     0
<COMMON>                              244,757
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                          8,264,544
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       11,825,304
<SALES>                             8,038,127
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    8,038,127
<CGS>                               7,326,412
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       7,326,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       540,487
<INCOME-TAX>                          215,363
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                          325,124
<EPS-BASIC>                               .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                             .16


</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-14997-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 53-4 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 53-4 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. DIXON

No. 62

Case below: 47 NC App 207

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 September 1980. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 16 September 1980.
Case 1:06-cv-14974-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1