alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6795

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. KENNETH ROSHAUN REID , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill

. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. ( 0:04

- cr - 00353

- CMC

- 1 )

Submitted : July 16, 2019 Decided: July 19, 2019

Before MOTZ , WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by un published per curiam opinion

.

Kenneth Roshaun Reid , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth Roshaun Reid has noted an appeal from the district court’s or der construing his motions to produce the record, to correct, and to dismiss as brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) and dismissing them as successive and denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No.
115

- 391, § 404, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222 (2018)

. The portion of the district court’s order construing Reid’s motions as § 2255 motions and dismissing them as successive is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012).
A certificate of appealability will not issue absen t “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the distric t court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must d emonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Reid has no t made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss this portion of the appeal.3 With respect to the portion of the district court’s order denying Reid’s motion under the First Step Act of 2018, we confine our re view to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Reid’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Reid has forfeited appellate review
of the court’s ruling

. See Jackson v. Lightse y , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm this portion of the district court’s order

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED IN PART , AFFIRMED IN PART
##### 



Jurisdiction orOwnership
    
    Incorporation ofSubsidiaries
    
    Percentage
    
    OrganizationCitizens Bank
    
    
    100
    %
    
    MichiganCB Financial Services, Inc.
    
    
    100
    %
    
    MichiganCitizens Title Services, Inc.
    
    
    100
    %
    
    MichiganCitizens Bank Mortgage Company, LLC
    
    
    1
    %
    
    MichiganCitizens Service Company, Inc.
    
    
    100
    %
    
    MichiganCitizens Bank Mortgage Company, LLC
    
    
    99
    %
    
    MichiganPulaski Capital Corporation
    
    
    100
    %
    
    NevadaF&M BankIowa
    
    
    100
    %
    
    IowaCitizens Bank Wealth Management, N.A.
    
    
    100
    %
    
    National AssociationSecurity Bancservices, Inc.
    
    
    100
    %
    
    Iowa
 116
#### STATE v. MARTIN

No. 23 PC.

Case below: 17 N.C. App. 317.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 April 1973.
#### KACZALA v. RICHARDSON

No. 124 PC.

Case below: 18 N.C. App. 446.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 August 1973.
Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.333-97783, No. 333-72128, No. 333-61136, and No. 333-32684) and Registration Statements on Form S-8(No. 333-135047, No. 333-106238, 333-90768, 333-80807, 333-56212, 333-32223, 333-11883, 33-35549,33-72502), Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-90768, Post-EffectiveAmendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 2-97542, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 toRegistration Statement No. 2-78926, and Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to Registration StatementNo. 2-78925, of our report dated March 30, 2007 relating to the financial statements andfinancial statement schedule of Thoratec Corporation ( which report expresses anunqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “*Share-BasedPayment*”), and our report dated March 30, 2007 relating to management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Thoratec Corporation for the year endedDecember 30, 2006./s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPSan Francisco, CaliforniaMarch 30, 2007
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Recent News & Stories             
  -  News Releases             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.33 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### McCRAW v. BANCORP, INC.

No. 20 PC.

Case below: 19 N.C. App. 21.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 December 1973.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 22 (Thursday, February 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2206]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, January 25, 2005, 10 a.m. 
meeting closed to the public. This meeting was cancelled.
* * * * *

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, February 8, 2005, at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and title 26, 
U.S.C.
Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.
* * * * *

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
telephone (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-2206 Filed 2-1-05; 2:19 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
#### WATERS v. HUMPHREY

No. 169 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 185.

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 14 July 1977. Appeal dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question 14 July 1977.
# Soldier Accounted for from WWII (Herrick, J.)

/ Published March 25, 2024
Washington, 
The Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) announced today that U.S. Army Sgt. John O. Herrick, 19, of Emporia, Kansas, killed during World War II, was accounted for Aug. 21, 2023.

In June 1944, Herrick was assigned to Company B, 149th Engineer Combat Battalion in the European Theater. On June 6, “D-Day”, Herrick was aboard Landing Craft Infantry (Large) 92, along with roughly 200 other servicemembers, enroute to land on Omaha Beach, in Normandy, France. As LCI-92 steamed toward the shore, it struck an underwater mine which caused the craft to burst into flames. The craft was also hit by enemy artillery fire, causing an explosion that ignited the ships fuel stores and instantly killed everyone in the troop compartment. Due to the urgency of the situation, it was impossible for others to search for survivors. Herrick’s remains were not accounted for after the war.

Around June 10, members of the 500th Medical Collecting Company examined the wreckage of LCI-92 and noted the burnt remains of servicemen in the troop compartment, where Herrick and others were last seen. American Graves Registration Command (AGRC), the organization that searched for and recovered fallen American personnel in the European Theater, removed small amounts of remains from LCI-92 and buried them in the United States Military Cemetery (USMC) St. Laurent-sur-Mer.

Beginning in 1946, AGRC analyzed the remains found in LCI-92, segregating them into four separate Unknowns (X-53, X-83, X-83B, and X-83C). Despite their efforts, AGRC were unable to identify the Unknowns at the time and they were interred in Normandy American Cemetery, an American Battle Monuments Commission site in Normandy, France.

In June and August 2021, the Department of Defense and ABMC officials exhumed the comingled remains of the four Unknowns and transferred them to the DPAA Laboratory for analysis.

To identify Herrick’s remains, scientists from DPAA used anthropological analysis. Additionally, scientists from the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System used mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and Y-chromosome DNA (Y-STR) analysis.

Herrick’s name is recorded on the Walls of the Missing at Normandy American Cemetery in Colleville-sur-Mer, France, along with others still missing from WWII. A rosette will be placed next to his name to indicate he has been accounted for.

Sgt. Herrick will be buried November 11, 2024, in Emporia, Kansas.

For family and funeral information, contact the Army Casualty Office at (800) 892-2490.

For additional information on the Defense Department’s mission to account for Americans who went missing while serving our country, visit the DPAA website at www.dpaa.mil or find us on social media at www.facebook.com/dodpaa or https://www.linkedin.com/company/defense-pow-mia-accounting-agency.

Herrick’s personnel profile can be viewed at  https://dpaa-mil.sites.crmforce.mil/dpaaProfile?id=a0Jt0000000XmAlEAK.
#### REEVES v. JURNEY

No. 233 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 739.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 September 1976.
Unassociated Document












 



1







 







 



2







 







 



3







 







 



4







 







 



5







 







 



6







 







 



7







 







 



8
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

S.F., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, GRAHAM POST 

OFFICE, Graham, WA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0592

Issued: May 2, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On March 13 2023 appellant filed an appeal from a July 19, 2022 nonmerit decision of 

the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards 

assigned Docket No. 23-0592.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act.

1

 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance 

of OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the July 19, 2022 decision was January 15, 2023. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until March 13, 2023, more than 180 days after the July 19, 

2022 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 23-0592 is untimely filed. 

The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not explained her failure to 

timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to establish compelling 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e).
2

circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of 

the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 23 -0592, 

must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-0592 is dismissed.

Issued: May 2, 2023

Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id.

at § 501.6(d).
##### 



Exhibit 23.2 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-69733 and
333-75504) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-113081) on Form S-3 of our
report dated November 14, 2003, except for Note K, as to
which the date is February 24, 2004, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Delphax Technologies Inc. for the years ended September 30, 2003 and 2002,
included
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
  Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 28, 2004
SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED
#### NASH v. YOUNT

No. 86 PC.

Case below: 35 N.C. App. 661.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 May 1978.
Case 1:06-cv-14917-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14917-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14917-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14917-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14917-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14917-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14917-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14917-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14917-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14917-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14917-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14917-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14917-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
#### ADLER v. INSURANCE CO.

No. 45 PC.

Case below: 10 N.C. App. 720.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 12 May 1971.
Exhibit 99.1

Supplementary Information Required Pursuant to Section 9.4 of the Partnership
Agreement (Unaudited)

      1.Statement of Cash Available for Distribution for the:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                   Three
                                                                                   Months
                                                              Year Ended           Ended
                                                             December 31,       December 31,
                                                                 2005               2005
                                                             ------------       ------------
<S>                                                          <C>                <C>
      Net loss                                               $   (106,000)      $    (25,000)
      Add: Cash from reserves                                     106,000             25,000
                                                             ------------       ------------
      Cash Available for Distribution                        $         --       $         --
                                                             ============       ============

      Distributions allocated to the General Partners        $         --       $         --
                                                             ============       ============

      Distributions allocated to Limited Partners            $         --       $         --
                                                             ============       ============
</TABLE>

      2. Fees and other compensation paid or accrued by the Partnership to the
General Partners, or their affiliates, during the three months ended December
31, 2005:

         Entity                   Receiving Form of
      Compensation                  Compensation                    Amount
      ------------                -----------------                 -------

          None
YANGMING’S REPLY EXHIBIT 6 

Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 19-7 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 19-7 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Eye Institute Special Emphasis Panel. NEI Clinical applications.                    

*Date:*                         November 21, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Anne E. Schaffner, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Extramural Research, National Eye Institute, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, MSC 9300, Bethesda, MD 20892-9300. (301) 451-2020.                         *aes@nei.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 4, 2005.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-22691 Filed 11-15-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 26, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00256

- CR

Jeffrey LEE

,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appel lee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR6806

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The

Appellant ’ s brief is due October 9, 2014.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26th day of August, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
f;-& 

' * IJ SDC SDW. ! t 

t DOCUR.iE?X i 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 E[EC!'RC::ICi3A'Y T1B.D li 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YoRK I r nm +: I: 

i. -- I i 

---------------------------------- c- 

- X : ,..._..&.---,.,. ___"_., I.d.C_.*.-+.-~-d*-l_ 

IN RE: FOSADLqX PRODUCTS LIABILmTTY : 

LITIGATION 

MDL NO. 17E9 

1 : 06-md- 1789 (JFKj 

X 

This Document Relates to: ORDER 

All actlons 

- X 

JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District Judge: 

Oral argument on Plaintiffs' notior: to compel 

production ~f documents will tdke plat-e at 1O:OG a.m. on 

June 2, 2008 in Court.room 20-C. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: New York, New York 

May 21, 2008 

x, 1 JOHN F. KEENAN \ 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03295-JFK Document 30 Filed 05/21/2008 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 13 Filed 02/17/2006 Page 1 of 2Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 13 Filed 02/17/2006 Page 2 of 2
YANGMING’S REPLY EXHIBIT 2 

Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 19-3 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 19-3 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 2 of 2