alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Marine Accounted For From Korean War (McAfee, J.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Unassociated Document












 



1







 







 



2







 







 



3







 







 



4







 







 



5







 







 



6







 







 



7







 







 



8







 







 



9







 







 



10







 







 



11







 







 



12







 







 



13
U.S. Department of Labor Employment Standards Administration 

 Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs

 Division of Longshore and 

 Harbor Workers’ Compensation 

 Washington, D.C. 20210

إشعار للموظفين

العمل آمتعاقد لدى الحكومة الأميرآية خارج أراضي الولايات المتحدة الأميرآية

ماذا يجب تعرفه قبل إصابتك في العمل

قانون الدفاع الأساسي يقدم تعويضات عن الإعاقة والعناية الطبية اللازمة والإصلاح

والتقويم المهني لهؤلاء الذين تمت إصابتهم أثناء العمل أو الوفاة. وتشمل هذه الحوافز

الناجين من الحادث إذا قتل العامل خلال القيام بعمله. وليس بالضرورة أن يكون مواطنا

أميرآيا أو مقيما شرعيا في الأراضي الأميرآية لكي يحصل على هذه التعويضات.

• اسأل الجهة الموظفة لك إذا آنت مشمولا بموجب تعويضات العمال لقانون الدفاع

الأساسي. اسأل تحت أي قانون تعويضات قد تم توظيفك عندما تعمل خارج

الأراضي الأميرآية.

• اسأل الجهة الموظفة لك عن اسم الشخص وعنوانه ورقم هاتفه والذي يفترض أن

تبلغه عن أية إصابة قد تحل بك. وقم بكتابة هذه المعلومات أدناه:

• اسأل الجهة الموظفة لك عن اسم وعنوان ورقم هاتف شرآة التامين التي يفترض

أن تقدم لها طلبات التعويض في حال إصابتك أثناء العمل وقم بكتابة هذه

المعلومات أدناه:

ما الذي عليك فعله في حال إصابتك

-1 إعلام مديرك بالأمر فورا. يجب أن تكون قد حصلت على معلومات هذا

الشخص في الفقرة المشار إليها أعلاها. وإذا أمكن أآمل الطلب -201LS وهو

إشعار بالإصابة ويمكنك الحصول عليه من مديرك.
U.S. Department of Labor Employment Standards Administration 

 Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs

 Division of Longshore and 

 Harbor Workers’ Compensation 

 Washington, D.C. 20210

-2 العلاج الطبي: اطلب إذن من مديرك لتلقي العلاج لدى الطبيب الذي تفضله. في

الحالات الطارئة وإذا لم تتمكن من الاتصال بمديرك، اذهب إلى اقرب عيادة أو

مستشفى. ولكن احرص على أن تخبر مديرك بأسرع وقت ممكن.

-3 الإعاقة: إذا أصابتك إعاقة لأآثر من ثلاثة أيام اتصل بمديرك أو شرآة التامين

الخاصة بك والتي تم الإشارة إليها أعلاه، لكي تتلقى التعويضات المستحقة،

والتي يجب أن تتم خلال 14 يوما من تاريخ أعلام مديرك بالأمر.

-4 هام: بموجب القانون يجب عليك في حالة الإصابة أن تبلغ مديرك ومكتب

تعويضات الموظفين بذلك خطيا خلال 30 يوما. ويمكن إعطاء وقت إضافي

لحالات فقدان السمع وطلبات أمراض العمل. يجب إرسال الإشعار إلى احد

العناوين التالية :

OWCP/DLHWC, P.O. Box 249, New York, NY 10014-0249, 

أو ,USA

OWCP/DLHWC, 300 Ala Moana, Box 50209, Honolulu, HI 

96850, USA 

-5 لمزيد من المساعدة والمعلومات: عند حاجتك لمعرفة المزيد فان مكتب برنامج

تعويضات الموظفين سيقوم بشرح الحوافز والإجراءات بموجب قانون الدفاع

الأساسي. آما يقوم الموظفون بتقديم المعلومات عن الخدمات الطبية والمهنية آما

يمكنهم مساعدتك للحصول على هذه الخدمات والحوافز. هذه المعلومات متاحة

عبر الانترنت على الموقع التالي:

http://www.dol.gov/esa/owcp/dlhwc/lstable.htm. 

ملاحظة هامة

القسم 31 – a - 1 من قانون لونغشور 33 C.S.U. 931 a 1 ينبهك إلى الأمور التالية: 

أي طلب يقدم من احد الأشخاص أو من الممثلين عنهم ويتبين أن الطلب مزيف عن

سابق إصرار بغرض الحصول على التعويضات والحوافز، بموجب هذا القانون يتم

تجريم الشخص بارتكاب جريمة جنائية وفي حال الإدانة يتم الحكم عليه بغرامة قدرها

10 الألف دولار أميرآي أو السجن لمدة لا تتجاوز الخمس سنوات، أو الحكم عليه بكلا

العقوبتين معا.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Lattice, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joe Noto, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section   1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|Date:   March 31, 2015 | By: | /s/ Joe Noto            | 
|---------------------- | --- | ----------------------- | 
|                       |     | Joe Noto                | 
|                       |     | Chief Financial Officer | 
|                       |     |                         |
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-10140

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DONALD LEE MCLEAN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:10-CR-136-1

Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Donald Lee McLean raises

arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Brown, 920 F.2d

1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir. 1991), abrogated on other grounds by United States v.

Candia, 454 F.3d 468, 472-73 (5th Cir. 2006), which held that a district court has

the discretion under 18 U.S.C. § 3584 to order a federal sentence to run

consecutively to a yet-to-be-imposed state sentence. See Setser v. United States,

132 S. Ct. 1463, 1466-73 (2012). The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 21, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-10140 Document: 00511963453 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012
No. 11-10140

of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 11-10140 Document: 00511963453 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/21/2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Winthrop
Partners 81 Limited Partnership and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                518,000
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            0
<PP&E>                              2,406,000
<DEPRECIATION>                       (906,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      2,039,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       0
<BONDS>                                     0
<COMMON>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                          1,989,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        2,039,000
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      173,000
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          95,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        27,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    27,000
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           27,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                            1.00



</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 9 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 9 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-15011-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15011-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15011-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15011-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15011-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15011-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15011-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15011-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15011-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15011-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15011-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15011-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15011-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
#### STATE v. BENNETT

No. 664PA82.

Case below: 59 N.C. App. 418.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 11 January 1983.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 4- 13 39

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Mat th ew T. Whi te ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v. Caro lyn W . Col vi n, Act in g C omm is si on er o f So ci al Secu rit y Adm in is tra ti on ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll ee

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ctof M is so ur i - St . Jo se ph

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Octo be r 23 , 20 14 Fi le d: Octo be r 29 , 20 14 [Un publ is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, BYE, and SMITH, Ci rcu it Ju dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.
Mat th ew T. Whi te ap p e a l s th e di st ric t co ur t’s or de r affi rm in g th e de ni al of 1 ch il d’s in su ran ce be ne fit s. Upo n de no vo rev ie w, we co nc lu de th at th e ad m in is tra ti ve
The Hon or ab l e D e a n Whi pp le , Un it ed St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e W es te rn 1 Dis tri ctof M is so ur i.la w jud ge ’s (ALJ’s) op in io n is su pp or te d by su bs ta nt ia l ev id en ce o n th e reco rd as a w ho le , in cl ud in g ne w ev id en ce th e App eal s Co un ci l co ns id ered

. See Dav id so n v . Ast ru e, 50 1 F.3 d 98 7, 98 9- 90 (8 th Ci r. 20 07 ). Sp eci fic al ly, we fin d no va li di ty to th e ch al le ng es Whi te rai se s to th e ALJ’s de te rm in at io n of hi s res id ua l fu nc ti on al cap aci ty (RFC ). See Eich el be rg er v. Barn ha rt, 39 0 F.3 d 58 4, 59 1 (8 th Ci r. 20 04 ) (cl ai m an t ha s bu rd en of es tabl is hi ng RFC; fact o r s i n RFC de te rm in at io n)

. The jud gm en t of th e di st ric t co ur t i s af

fir m ed

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

August 3, 2016

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

No. 15‐1720

Kimberly Hively,

Plaintiff‐Appellant,

v.

Ivy Tech Community College,

South Bend,

Defendant‐Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Indiana,

South Bend Division

No. 3:14‐cv‐1791

Rudy Lozano, Judge

O R D E R

This Court’s opinion of July 28, is amended as follows:

On page 7 of the opinion, the word “discrimination” should be inserted between

the words “orientation” and “in” so that the complete sentence which begins on page 6

and carries over to page 7 reads as follows:

Moreover, Congress has not acted to amend Title VII even in the face of an

abundance of judicial opinions recognizing an emerging consensus that

sexual orientation discrimination in the workplace can no longer be

tolerated.
# C_2007113EN.01000101.xml

| 23.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4601 — KarstadtQuelle/MyTravel)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 113/01)

On 4 May 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4601. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4601. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. RUFUS J. SUTTON.

(Filed 21 September, 1966.)

Appeal by defendant from *Farthing, J.,*March 1966 Session of Ruthereord.

Defendant escaped from the custody of the North Carolina Prison Department while serving a 2-year sentence imposed upon him by the Superior Court of Haywood County for the crime of nonsupport. *166At the November 1965 Session of Rutherford, he was indicted for the escape (a misdemeanor), pled guilty, and received a sentence of 9 months to begin at the expiration of the uncompleted 2-year term. G.S. 148-45. Thereafter, while still serving the nonsupport sentence, defendant instituted proceedings under G.S. 15-217 *et seq.*to vacate the escape sentence on the ground that he had not been represented by counsel at the time he entered his plea of guilty. Judge Riddle heard defendant’s petition and vacated the sentence. He ordered a new trial and appointed defendant’s present counsel to represent him. At the March 1966 Session, defendant, through his attorney, James H. Burwell, Jr., Esquire, entered a plea of guilty to the escape charged in the bill of indictment. Judge Farthing, in open court, fully examined defendant with reference to the voluntariness of his plea and informed him in minute detail of the possible consequences of it. Defendant reaffirmed his plea of guilty, and Judge Farthing imposed a sentence of 9 months. Defendant was then remanded to the custody of the Prison Department to complete the nonsupport sentence before beginning the escape sentence. The next day, March 12, 1966, defendant, acting for himself and without the advice of counsel, by letter, gave notice of appeal to this Court. Judge Farthing ordered his attorney to prosecute his appeal.

*T. W. Bruton, Attorney General, Theodore C. Brown, Jr., Staff Attorney for the State.*

*J. H. Burwell, Jr., for defendant appellant.*

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s case on appeal contains no exception or assignment of error. The appeal itself, however, constitutes an exception to the judgment and presents for review any error appearing on the face of the record. 1 Strong, N. C. Index, Criminal Law § 154. No error appears. This case is another exemplification of the manner in which many defendants, at public expense, are abusing the unlimited right of appeal which this State grants to all who have been sentenced for crime — either upon a plea of guilty or a verdict of guilty.

No error.
LAW OFFICES OF 

CICHANQWICZ, CALLAN, KEANE, VENGROW h T %TOR, ELP 

61 BROADWAY, SUITE 3000 

E 

June 20,2007 

NEW JERSETOFFlcE 

75 MONTGOME~Y STREET. SUITE 200 

JERSEY CIN. NJ 07302 

1201) 209-0960 

A.J. MARINO 

OF COUNSEL 

BY HAND MEMO ENWED 

Hon. P. Kevin Caste1 

Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse 

500 Pearl Street, Room 2260 

New York, New York 10007 

Re: Nippon Express USA (Illinois), Inc. v. 

CHIANG JIANG BRIDGE 

06 CIV 694 

Our reference no.: 8740PMK 

Honorable Sir: I 

We are the attorneys for defendant, YANG h4ING TRANSPORT 

CORP., in the above captioned matter. We write to object to of a 

sur-reply memorandum without prior leave of court (see 

memoranda are not provided for by the Federal or Local 

prior leave of Court. That does not mean that counsel 

along with the request as plaintiff has done. As Judge 

The proposed ... papers should not accompany the request or leave to 

submit them. To permit the ... papers to accompany the reques . as they do 

in the instant case, is to enable the requesting party to accom I lish its goal 

of placing the papers before the court, thereby reducing the question of 

whether the papers should be accepted for filing to relative portance. 

Therefore, the ... papers themselves shall not be submitted un .t- il the court, 

having received and reviewed the application to file, invites th 

Travelers Ins. Co. v. Buflalo Reinsurance Co., 735 p. 492, 495 - 96 

(S.D.N.Y.) vacated on other grounds 739 F.Supp. 209 1990). Under the 

Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 20 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 2
Hon. P. Kevin Castel June 20,2007 

CHANG JIANG BRIDGE I Page 2 

circumstances, we respectfully request permission to respond with supplemental brief of 

our own with the understanding that briefing be closed as to any er submissions for 

which prior leave of court has not been obtained. 

Paul M. Keane 

PMK/am 

Cc: David MalooUMaloof & Browne 

Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 20 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

# Marine Accounted For From World War II (Fahy, J.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Case 1:06-cv-15018-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15018-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15018-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15018-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15018-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15018-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15018-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15018-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15018-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15018-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15018-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15018-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15018-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13