alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Riggs National Corporation (the Company) for
the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence I. Hebert, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  (1)
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. By: /S/ LAWRENCE I. HEBERT
Name: Lawrence I. Hebert
Principal Executive Officer
March 29, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-7995-4] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Cost Recovery Settlement. 

# SUMMARY:

Under section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the Environmental Protection Agency has offered a cost recovery settlement at the Northeast Chemical Superfund Site (Site) located in Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina. EPA will consider public comments on the settlement until December 12, 2005. EPA may withdraw from or modify the proposed settlement should such comments disclose facts or considerations which indicate the proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. 

                        Copies of the proposed settlement are available from: Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Waste Management Division,  61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303, (404) 562-8887,  E-mail:                         *Batchelor.Paula@EPA.gov.*

Written or e-mail comments may be submitted to Paula V. Batchelor at the above address within 30 days of the date of publication. 

Dated: October 24, 2005.

Rosalind H. Brown,

Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Waste Management Division.

[FR Doc. 05-22374 Filed 11-9-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
<PAGE>

               Consent of Independent Auditors



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
C-COR.net Corp:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 2-
95959, 33-27440, 33-35208, 33-66590, 333-02505, 333-65805) on Form S-8 and (No.
333-82697) on Form S-3 of C-COR.net Corp. of our report dated August 16, 1999,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of C-COR.net Corp. as of June 25,
1999 and June 26, 1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
cash flows and shareholders' equity for each of the years in the three-year
period ended June 25, 1999, and related schedule which reports appear in the
June 25, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of C-COR.net Corp.


                                                        KPMG LLP


State College, Pennsylvania
September 22, 1999
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES W. VANDIVNER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 33 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) In connection with the Annual Report of Intergraph Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Larry
J. Laster, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350), that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. By:
    
    /s/ Larry J. LasterName:
    
    Larry J. LasterTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial OfficerDate:
    
    November 8, 2004
 [A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Intergraph Corporation and will be retained by Intergraph
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.]
Exhibit 99.1.a

           Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                    18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to
         Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Great Plains Energy Incorporated (the "Company") for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Bernard J. Beaudoin, as Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Andrea F. Bielsker, as Senior Vice President - Finance, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (Section symbol) 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


/s/Bernard J. Beaudoin
Bernard J. Beaudoin
Chairman of the Board, President
    and Chief Executive Officer
Date:  August 12, 2002


/s/Andrea F. Bielsker
Andrea F. Bielsker
Senior Vice President - Finance,
    Chief Financial Officer and
    Treasurer
Date:  August 12, 2002

     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to
(Section symbol) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
(Section symbol) 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Riggs National Corporation
(the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven
T. Tamburo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



By: /s/ Steven T. Tamburo
Name: Steven T. Tamburo
Chief Financial Officer
March 10, 2003
#### STATE v. BOONE

No. 51.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 378.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 23 August 1977.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Wardell Rodney JONES, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-4974.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 2005.

Decided April 7, 2005.

Robert Leonard Flax, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul Joseph McNulty, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia; Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAKLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Wardell Rodney Jones seeks to appeal his conviction and sentence. The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal as untimely. In criminal cases, the defendant must file his notice of appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. RApp. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, the district court may grant an extension of time to file of up to thirty days upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4); *United States v. Reyes,*759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.1985).

The district court entered its judgment in May 2004; the notice of appeal was not filed until October 2004. Because Jones failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we grant the Government’s motion and dismiss the appeal from Jones’ conviction and sentence.

Further, Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. Because the district court lacked jurisdiction to extend the appeal period, we affirm that order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART*
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.09 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 16, 2022

No. 04-22-00092-CV

IN RE THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Following a February 4, 2022 hearing, the trial court signed an order entitled “Order 

Following Hearing Regarding Placement” (the “February 4 order”).2 

On February 15, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the 

February 4 order. The Department also filed a motion asking this court to stay: the February 4

order, “any new or revised orders to the same effect,” and “the trial court from taking punitive 

and coercive action to enforce the provisions of [the February 9] order, including but not limited 

to incarceration and monetary sanctions.”

We GRANT the motion for temporary emergency relief in part as follows:

1. The following decretal paragraph in the trial court’s “Order Following Hearing 

Regarding Placement” rendered on February 4, 2022 and signed on February 8, 2022 is

STAYED pending further order of this court:

2.8. IT IS ORDERED that the DEPARTMENT shall enter a Child Specific 

Contract for [J.F.], at the rate of $500 per day, for the purpose of placement 

within Bexar County whether it is in a foster home, group home, or transitional 

living. Said Contract shall be circulated to the Attorneys no later than February 

11, 2022. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this portion of the Order shall be 

stayed until the next scheduled hearing as indicated below.

.

2. Any further proceedings, including but not limited to the rendition or creation of new 

or revised orders, regarding the creation of contracts or the payment of funds regarding the 

child’s placement are STAYED pending further order of this court.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020-PA-01628, styled In the Interest of V.F. and J.F., Children, pending 

in the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. The Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez signed the order at 

issue in this proceeding.

2 The trial court signed the order on February 8, 2022.
3. Any further contempt proceedings, sanctions, or incarceration of Department 

representatives arising from the underlying suit and any orders to incarcerate Department 

representatives arising from contempt proceedings in the underlying suit are STAYED pending 

further order of this court.

It is so ORDERED on February 16, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

 Clerk of Court
Case 1:07-cv-03238-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03238-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03238-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03238-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03238-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03238-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03238-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03238-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03238-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 9 of 9
Case 1:06-cv-15067-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-14960-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

-againstJAMES CUTLER, 

Defendant. 

No. 02-CR-441 (LAP) 

ORDER 

LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: 

The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) shall file a letter 

outlining the IRS’s view regarding (1) Mr. Cutler’s requests in 

his letters of January 7, 2018, (dkt. no. 428), November 13, 

2020 (dkt. no. 426), and June 28, 2021, (dkt. no. 433); and (2) 

the effects of the order entered at docket number 292 in In re 

Sage Ranch Estates, LLC, No. 06-50111 (GWZ) (Bankr. D. Nev. 

Sept. 26, 2013) vis-à-vis Erika Cutler’s tax liability for the 

years 2005 and 2006. That letter shall be filed no later than 

August 13, 2021. Counsel for the Government shall serve this 

order on the IRS and indicate such service on the docket. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 29, 2021 

New York, New York 

 __________________________________ 

 LORETTA A. PRESKA 

 Senior United States District Judge 

Case 1:02-cr-00441-LAP Document 434 Filed 07/29/21 Page 1 of 1
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 38 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 38 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-15116-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
0- , . . . , . . ,. .. . . . . . .. -.-.--- --..-...,-. _ . ---- ----.----- -"---dx 

j i:Sii\.<: SDNY "1 

1 fig (;l,!y$f<r 1 i l i 

I EI~~yg;tr.:.;e,~;,.~y F~I,;~D 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -A;..--.- 

IN RE: 

: MASTER i:11,E 

FOSAMAX PRODUCTS LIABII,ITY LITIGATION 

I I :06-MD-I 789 (JFK) 

This Document Relates 7b .4N ilctions 

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE ON ORAL MOTION 

Upon the oral motion of William .I. Beausolcil, attorney for defendant Merck &: Co., Inc., and 

said sponsor attorney's declaration that applicant James M. Doran, Jr. is a member in good 

standing of the bar of the United States District Court for the MiddIe District of Tennessee; 

and that applicant's contact information is as follows: 

Applicant's Name: James M. Doran, Jr. 

Firm Namc: Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis 

Addrcss: Nashville City Center, 51 1 Union Strcet, Suite 2700 

CityIStatclZip: Nashville. Tenncssee 372 19 

TeicphoneIFax: (6 15) 850-8843/(615) 244-6804 

Email Address: jim.doran@,wallerlaw.com 

said applicant having requested admission pro hac vice to appcar for all purposes as counsel for 

Merck & Co., Inc. in the above entitled action: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that James M. Doran, Jr, is admitted to practice pro hac vice in the 

above captioned case in the United States District Court fbr the Southern District of New York. 

All attorneys appearing before this Court are suhject to the Local Rules of this Court, including 

thc Rulcs governing discipline of attomcys. If this action is assigned to thc Electronic Case 

Filing (ECF) system, counscl shall immediately apply for an ECF password at 

Case 1:07-cv-03295-JFK Document 2 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 1 of 3
2 

\v\\w.n~~sd.uscourisb~o~~. Counsel shall immediately forward the pro hac vice fee to the Clerk of 

the Court. 

Dated: June 212007 

New York, New York 

--- 

-united States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03295-JFK Document 2 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 2 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DlSTRICT OF TENNESSEE 

CERTlFlCATE OF GOOD STANDlNG 

1. KEITH THROCKMORTON. Clerk ofthe llnited Stalcs District Court for the 

Middle District of'l'enncssee. do herebq certilicd that .JAMES M. DOHAN was duly 

admitted to practice in said Court on April 10, 1970, and is in good standing as a member 

of thc bar ofsaid Court. 

Dated at Nashville. 'l'enncssee on May 29, 2007 

KI;I'TI~I THKOCKMORTON, CI,EIU -- Deputy CI 

Case 1:07-cv-03295-JFK Document 2 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-15114-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15114-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15114-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15114-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15114-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15114-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15114-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15114-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15114-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15114-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15114-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15114-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15114-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15096-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15035-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15035-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15035-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15035-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15035-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15035-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15035-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15035-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15035-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15035-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15035-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15035-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15035-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
#### STATE v. THOMAS

No. 144 PC.

Case below: 20 N.C. App'. 255.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolind. Court of Appeals denied 5 February 1974.
Case 1:06-cv-15136-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15136-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15136-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15136-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15136-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15136-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15136-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15136-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15136-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15136-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15136-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15136-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15136-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15027-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 44 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 1 of 1