alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.2



I, Arnold J.M. van der Ven, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of ASM International N.V.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 17, 2006.













|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/    ARNOLD J.M. VAN DER
VEN                 
|Arnold J.M. van der Ven Chief Financial Officer
|
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certification of

Chief Financial Officer

of Supreme Industries, Inc. Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

This certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and accompanies the annual reporton Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) for the year ended December 31, 2005 of SupremeIndustries, Inc. (the “Company”). I, Jeffery D. Mowery, the Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify that, based on my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Form 10-K fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periodscovered in this report.

 

 
| Dated: March 30, 2006   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |
|                    |
| /s/ Jeffery D. Mowery   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Kreisler Manufacturing Corporation (the Company) does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
March 31, 2007 (the Report) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 15, 2007 |  | /s/ Michael D. Stern   
|                   |  | Michael D. Stern       
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                   | 
|Date: May 15, 2007 |  | /s/ Edward A. Stern    
|                   |  | Edward A. Stern        
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS     Document 156      Filed 06/04/2008     Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7469

TERICK MIKE JAMES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MS. RODRIQUES, Emergency Medical Technician,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, 

District Judge. (1:16-cv-00528-TDS-LPA)

Submitted: March 9, 2017 Decided: March 31, 2017

Before WYNN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terick Mike James, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Terick Mike James seeks to appeal the district court’s 

judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge 

and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 

U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the 

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. 

R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s judgment was entered on the docket on 

September 2, 2016. The notice of appeal was filed on October 

17, 2016.* Because James failed to file a timely notice of 

appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal 

period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

 * For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date 

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could 

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to 

the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 

(1988).
3

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

RONALD OCKIMEY, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 230 EAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 11th day of October, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (6.44 MB)

Tags:POW/MIA, DPAA, FMU, Family Member Update

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1440 

To discontinue a Federal program that authorizes State and local law enforcement officers to investigate, apprehend, and detain aliens in accordance 

with a written agreement with the Director of U.S. Immigration and 

Customs Enforcement and to clarify that immigration enforcement is 

solely a function of the Federal Government. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2019 

Mr. BOOKER (for himself, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. SCHATZ, Mr. 

SANDERS, and Ms. HARRIS) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To discontinue a Federal program that authorizes State and 

local law enforcement officers to investigate, apprehend, 

and detain aliens in accordance with a written agreement 

with the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and to clarify that immigration enforcement 

is solely a function of the Federal Government. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting the Rights 

5 Of Towns against federal Enforcement contrary to ConVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:42 May 23, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1440.IS S1440

pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1440 IS

1 stitutional Tenets for Immigration Act’’ or the ‘‘PRO2 TECT Immigration Act’’. 

3 SEC. 2. RESCISSION OF STATE AND LOCAL IMMIGRATION 

4 ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY. 

5 Section 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality 

6 Act (8 U.S.C. 1357(g)) is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(g) Except as provided in sections 103(a)(10) and 

8 274(c) of this Act and in section 439 of the Antiterrorism 

9 and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 

10 1252c), the authority to inquire about or verify immigra11 tion or citizenship status and to investigate, apprehend, 

12 arrest, or detain an individual for a violation of this Act 

13 or any regulation authorized by this Act is restricted to 

14 immigration officers and authorized employees of the De15 partment of Homeland Security and subject to limits set 

16 forth in other provisions of law.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
#### DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v. BRAGG

No. 670PA82.

Case below: 59 N.C. App. 344.

Petition by defendants Bragg for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 28 January 1983.
UNL'I'LL) S'l'A'l'LS IIISTRICT COUK'I' 

SOUTHERN DISTRIC'S 01: NEW YORK 

IN RE: 

i hl:ZSTER FILE 

FOSAMAX PKOLl1!C'TS LIABILITY L,lTIGA'I'lON 

1 106-M 11- 1 789 (JFK) 

'177i.~ Llocuntent Keicrles To All Ac1ion.c 

ORDER FOR .4DhIISSION PRO HAG VICE 

Considering the Cerlijicate 01' Good Standing and ol l othcr docut~~cnts rcquired by Case 

Management Order No. 5 submitted by counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

..ll-'pl icant's Name: Kathlccn Sullivan Hardway UC-' r;srz,L *--I--- ---- 

Firm N;~mt.: Venable LLP 

Address: -1'tvo I Iopkins Plaza. Suite 1 800 

1 

CityIStatclZip: Haltimore. Maryland 2 1201 . w ,--- -- , ) 

3 -/y-u3 f 

_--..--....-- ii L-.- - .' "---"--urn"- 

-- .AIWI 

.I TelephoneTax: (4 1 0) 244-7400/(4 10) 244-7742 

Email Address: k shard~~-ay51::ve11able.com 

is acimilted to practice pro har \ icc as counsel lbr hIt.1-c.k & Co.. Iric. in the ahoi r. c:iptioned case 

in the I!nited Statcs I)isrric~ C'our~ fill- the Southern District of New York. 

New Yorli. Neu 1'~lrk 

d' 

r - 

(/ Il'nited States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03294-JFK Document 19 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Good 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DISTRICT OF MARYLAND 

I, Felicia C. Cannon, Clerk of the United States District Court for the District 

of hlaryland, 

DO HEREBY CERTIFY that, KATHLEEY F. SCLLI17AN, 

ESQUIRE, BAR NUMBER 25406, was duly admitted to practice in the 

United States District Court for the District of Mar?land on September I I, 1998, 

and is currently in good standing as a member of the bar of this Court. 

Dated at Baltimore, Maryland FEI,ICIA C. CANNOY 

Clerk 

Tina Stavrou - Deputy Clerk 

Case 1:07-cv-03294-JFK Document 19 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Missile Defense Agency (MDA), DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of closed meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Missile Defense Advisory Committee will meet in closed session on December 1-2, 2005, in Washington, DC.

The mission of the Missile Defense Advisory Committee is to provide the Department of Defense advice on all matters relating to missile defense, including system development, technology, program maturity and readiness of configurations of the Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) to enter the acquisition process. At this meeting, the Committee will hold receive classified status reports on offensive-defensive integration; centralized and decentralized management; threat 2015-2025; capability-based acquisition; and cruise missile defense.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        COL David R. Wolf, Designated Federal Official (DFO) at                         *david.wolf@mda.mil*, phone/voice mail (703) 695-6438, or mail at 7100 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-7100.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been determined that this Missile Defense Advisory Committee meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the meeting will be closed to the public.

Dated: November 16, 2005.

L.M. Bynum,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Office, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 05-23065 Filed 11-21-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 85 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 85 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Iteris, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jack Johnson, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Dated: June 29, 2006 |   |                    |
|---------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                      |   |                    |
|                      |   | /s/ JACK JOHNSON        |
|                      |   | Jack Johnson,           |
|                      |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or anyother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Case 1:06-cv-15129-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of K-tel International, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Dennis Ward, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.       The report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.       The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

 
| By                                                                  | /s/ DENNIS WARD |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|--------|
| Dennis Ward                                                         |            |
| Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) and  Director |            |
| May 17, 2004                                                        |            |
|                                                                     |                 |        |  |

 

----
#### STATE v. PARKER

No. 88 PC.

Case below: 35 N.C. App. 412.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 May 1978.