alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF WMS INDUSTRIES INC.



The following is a list of all direct and indirect subsidiaries of the Company and their jurisdictions of incorporation as of June 30, 2009. The name
of each indirect subsidiary is indented under the name of its parent company.



|                                     |  |                                        
|------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------
|Subsidiary                           |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation/Formation
|                                     | 
|WMS Gaming Inc.                      |  | Delaware                               
|WMS Gaming (Canada) Ltd.             |  | New Brunswick, Canada                  
|WMS Gaming International, S.L.       |  | Spain                                  
|WMS Gaming Australia PTY Ltd.        |  | Australia                              
|WMS Gaming Africa (Pty) Ltd.         |  | South Africa                           
|WMS Gaming (UK) Limited              |  | United Kingdom                         
|WMS Gaming Slovakia, s.r.o.          |  | Slovakia                               
|WMSGaming Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. |  | Mexico                                 
|Lenc-Smith Inc.                      |  | Delaware                               
|Williams Electronics Games, Inc.     |  | Delaware                               
|WMS Finance Inc.                     |  | Delaware                               
|WMS International Holdings Inc.      |  | Delaware                               
|Orion Financement Company B.V.       |  | Netherlands                            
|Orion Real Estate B.V.               |  | Netherlands                            
|Orion Assembly B.V.                  |  | Netherlands                            
|Mercur Holland B.V.                  |  | Netherlands                            
|Orion Gaming B.V.                    |  | Netherlands                            
|WMS Gaming Services Europe, S.L.     |  | Spain                                  
|Systems in Progress Holding GmbH     |  | Austria                                
|WMS Asia Holdings Inc.               |  | Delaware                               
|WMS International (Macau) Limited    |  | Macau                                  
|WMS Alderney 1 Limited               |  | Alderney                               
|WMS Alderney 2 Ltd.                  |  | Alderney                               
|WMS Marketing UK Ltd.                |  | United Kingdom
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 14 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 14 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 6 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 7 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 8 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 9 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 10 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 11 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 12 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 13 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 14 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 15 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 16 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 17 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 18 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 19 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 20 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 21 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 22 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 23 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 24 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 25 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 26 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 27 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 28 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 29 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 30 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 31 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 32 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 33 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 34 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 35 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 36 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 37 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 38 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-4 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 39 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03348-AKH Document 2 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03322-LBS     Document 8      Filed 03/26/2008     Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Katy Industries,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Amir
Rosenthal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Amir Rosenthal
------------------------
Amir Rosenthal
Chief Financial Officer
November 7, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Katy Industries, Inc. and will be
retained by Katy Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                     - 44 -
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6532

MILTON N. WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Roderick Charles Young, Magistrate Judge. (3:15-cv-00690-RCY)

Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: June 23, 2017

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Milton N. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Elizabeth Baumgartner, OFFICE OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Milton N. Williams seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on 

Williams’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition.∗ The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) 

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the 

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court 

denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED

 ∗ The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).
#### STATE BAR v. HALL

No. 119 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 166.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 31 January 1977. Motion of plaintiff to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 31 January 1977.
Order entered October 13, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 01425

- CV

ALBERT MORRIS AND TI LDA MORRIS, ET AL., Appellant s

V.

UNIFIED HOUSING FOUN DATION INC., ET AL., Appellee s
On Appeal from the 14th Judicial D istrict Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 11

- 15358



### O RDER

W e GRANT the October 10, 2014 second unopposed extension motion of appellees
Unified Housing Foundation, Inc., Unified Housing of Inwood, LLC d/b/a Inwood on The Park
Apts., and S unchase American, Ltd. and ORDER their brief be filed no later than October 17,
2014. No further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
#### MEEKS v. ATKESON

No. 61 PC.

Case below: 7 N.C. App. 631.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 12 June 1970.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM BAIRNCO'S 1995 ANNUAL
REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         608,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,235,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   763,000
<INVENTORY>                                 23,736,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,342,000
<PP&E>                                      77,792,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              43,343,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              98,196,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,992,000
<BONDS>                                     21,236,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       111,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  47,913,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                98,196,000
<SALES>                                    150,507,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           150,507,000
<CGS>                                       97,190,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               97,190,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,026,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,607,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,826,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,781,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,781,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.75
        

</TABLE>
Case 7:07-cv-03324-SCR Document 7 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03324-SCR Document 7 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-14985-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. GOINS

No. 29 PC.

Case below: 24.N.C. App. 468.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 May 1975.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 218 (Monday, November 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 69185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22533]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 10205 and <greek-i> 10206]


Louisiana Disaster Number LA-00004

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 8.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1607-DR), dated 09/24/
2005.
    Incident: Hurricane Rita.
    Incident Period: 09/23/2005 and continuing through 11/01/2005.
    Effective Date: 11/01/2005.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/11/2006.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/26/2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, National Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 
Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 
6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Louisiana, dated 09/24/2005, is hereby 
amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 
09/23/2005 and continuing through 11/01/2005.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Cheri L. Cannon,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 05-22533 Filed 11-10-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 147 Filed 04/02/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 147 Filed 04/02/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 147 Filed 04/02/2008 Page 3 of 3
#### LAUTENSCHLAGER v. BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION

No. 88 PC.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 228.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 May 1975. ■ '
#### STATE v. WALLACE

No. 99 PC.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 360.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 June 1975.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Recent News & Stories             
  -  News Releases             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS Oklahoma Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Banks, L.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>


THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF JACOBSON STORES INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES AS
OF, AND FOR THE THIRTY-NINE WEEK PERIOD ENDED, OCTOBER 26, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                              <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                JAN-25-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                     OCT-26-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<CASH>                                                  3,926
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          37,229
<ALLOWANCES>                                              701
<INVENTORY>                                           106,794
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      156,381
<PP&E>                                                171,879
<DEPRECIATION>                                         78,985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        272,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  54,326
<BONDS>                                               137,787
<COMMON>                                                5,966
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                             65,801
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          272,346
<SALES>                                               291,293
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      291,293
<CGS>                                                 196,928
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         196,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      6,806
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (11,818)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           (4,136)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (7,682)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (7,682)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (1.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (1.33)
        

</TABLE>
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-50386

 

ELSIE J. CHURCH, Deceased;

MARSHALL B. MILLER, JR.,

Independent Co-Executor; MARY

ELISE NEWTON, Independent

Co-Executor,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Western District of Texas

(USDC No. SA-97-CV-774)

_______________________________________________________

July 18, 2001

Before KING, Chief Judge, REAVLEY and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the following reasons.
2

The only issue of the estate’s valuation is whether the transfer of the assets was

restricted at the time of Church’s death. Different legal theories have been argued during

the course of this proceeding, but that has always been the dispositive question – as it was

the basis for the different valuations given the assets by the appraiser (not now

questioned). Regardless of the status of the limited partnership due to the certificate not

being filed on that date, the documents that Church had signed imposed restrictions on the

assets that necessarily caused their value to be discounted even if no limited partnership

was then formed.

We reject the government’s argument that the 1999 revision of the Texas statute

made the filing of the certificate an absolute prerequisite to the creation of a limited

partnership and rendered an agreement between the parties unenforceable until the time of

filing. A Texas court has held that a written partnership agreement constitutes an

enforceable contract and governs the rights of the parties. Hoagland v. Finholt, 773

S.W.2d 740, 742-43 (Tex. App.–Dallas 1989, no writ). Further, the Bar Committee’s

commentary to the 1999 revision of section 2.01 states that the revision was not meant to

overturn Garrett v. Koepke, 569 S.W.2d 568 (Tex. App.–Dallas 1978, writ ref’d n.r.e.),

which held that an entity could operate as a limited partnership before filing a certificate. 

TEX. REV. CIV. STAT. ANN. art. 6132a-1 § 2.01, Source and Comment–Bar Committee

(Vernon Supp. 2001).

The estate stated in its pleadings that the discounts for lack of control applied

without the formation of a limited partnership, and in its refund claim it stated that it was
3

entitled to a “discount for lack of control and marketability.” The IRS was apprised of the

nature of the refund claim.

AFFIRMED.