alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 221 (Thursday, November 17, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 69746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22883]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, December 30, 2005.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
Surveillance matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-22883 Filed 11-15-05; 12:20 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-03222-RPP Document 27 Filed 01/18/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03222-RPP Document 27 Filed 01/18/2008 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
KOLLMORGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES                   EXHIBIT 27
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED
      IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>        
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS      
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                            10,913 
<SECURITIES>                           0 
<RECEIVABLES>                     47,054 
<ALLOWANCES>                         916 
<INVENTORY>                       30,289 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  95,888 
<PP&E>                           109,889 
<DEPRECIATION>                    80,329 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         0 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             71,372 
<BONDS>                           31,090 
<COMMON>                          26,929 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0 
<PREFERRED>                            0 
<OTHER-SE>                        26,388 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     168,149 
<SALES>                          165,917 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 179,024 
<CGS>                                   113,037 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    123,464 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  47,493 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 2,574 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   19,496 
<INCOME-TAX>                       8,539 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               10,957 
<DISCONTINUED>                         0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0 
<CHANGES>                              0 
<NET-INCOME>                      10,957 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       1.09 
<EPS-DILUTED>                       1.04 
        



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------ x

JAMIE CHACON,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANDREA QUARANTILLO,

Defendant.

ECF CASE

07 Civ. 03375 (LAP)

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

------------------------------------------------------------ x

TO: Clerk of Court

United States District Court

Southern District of New York

The undersigned attorney respectfully requests the Clerk to note his appearance in this case

and to add him as a Filing User to whom Notices of Electronic Filing will be transmitted in this case.

Date: New York, New York

April 14, 2008

Respectfully submitted,

MICHAEL J. GARCIA

United States Attorney for the

Southern District of New York

By: /s/ 

F. JAMES LOPREST, JR.

Special Assistant United States Attorney

86 Chambers Street, 3 Floor rd

New York, New York 10007

Telephone: (212) 637-2728

Facsimile: (212) 637-2786 

Email: james.loprest@usdoj.gov

TO: Spiro Serras, Esq.

Wilens & Baker, P.C.

450 Seventh Avenue

New York, NY 10123

Case 1:07-cv-03375-LAP Document 5 Filed 04/14/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### PURDY v. BROWN

No. 243PA82.

Case below: 307 N.C. 93.

Petition by defendant to rehear denied 11 January 1983.
# C_2007262EN.01000901.xml

| 1.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4904 — Lite-On/Perlos)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 262/07)

On 8 October 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4904. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4904. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Case 7:07-cv-03311-KMK Document 10 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03311-KMK Document 10 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 32-2 Filed 03/24/2008 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 32-2 Filed 03/24/2008 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 32-2 Filed 03/24/2008 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 32-2 Filed 03/24/2008 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 32-2 Filed 03/24/2008 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 1 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 2 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 3 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 4 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 5 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 6 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 7 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 8 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 9 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 10 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 11 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 12 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 13 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 14 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 15 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 16 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 17 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 18 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-3 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 19 of 19
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1370 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat certain military survivor benefits as earned income for purposes of the kiddie tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1370 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gold Star Family Tax 

3 Relief Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CERTAIN MILITARY SURVIVOR BENEFITS TREATED 

5 AS EARNED INCOME FOR KIDDIE TAX. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1(g)(4) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following new subparagraph: 

9 ‘‘(D) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN MILITARY

10 SURVIVOR BENEFITS.—For purposes of this 

11 subsection, any benefit under laws administered 

12 by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of 

13 Veterans Affairs which— 

14 ‘‘(i) is received by a child by reason of 

15 the child being the survivor of a deceased 

16 member of the Armed Forces or of a de17 ceased veteran, and 

18 ‘‘(ii) is included in the gross income of 

19 such child, 

20 shall be considered earned income of such 

21 child.’’. 
3 

†S 1370 ES

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2017. 

Passed the Senate May 21, 2019. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1370 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

income for purposes of the kiddie tax. treat certain military survivor benefits as earned
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of Section 371(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the lessee, Del-Rio Resources, Inc., timely filed a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease UTU18726 in Uintah County, Utah. The lessee paid the required rental accruing from the date of termination, June 1, 2002.

                        No leases were issued that affect these lands. The lessee agrees to new lease terms for rentals and royalties of $5 per acre and 16                        2/3                         percent, respectively. The lessee paid the $500 administration fee for the reinstatement of the lease and $155 cost for publishing this notice.                    

The lessee met the requirements for reinstatement of the lease per Sec. 31(e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 [30 U.S.C. 188(e)]. We are proposing to reinstate the lease, effective the date of termination subject to:
      - The original terms and conditions of the lease;
      - The increased rental of $5 per acre;
      - The increased royalty of 162/3                         percent; and                    
      - The $155 cost of publishing this notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David H. Murphy, Acting Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals at (801) 539-4122.

David H. Murphy,

Acting Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals.

[FR Doc. 05-22776 Filed 11-16-05; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 4310-DK-M
Case 1:06-cv-15040-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS Oklahoma Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Flanagan, J.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Case 1:06-cv-15092-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15037-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03380-JGK     Document 5      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-10084 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROBERTO ANTONIO MUNOZ-PEREZ, also known as Javier Castaneda-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:02-CR-92-1-C

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Roberto Antonio Munoz-Perez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Munoz-Perez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should haveNo. 03-10084 -2- been alleged in his indictment. Munoz-Perez maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the maximum sentence which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Munoz-Perez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
EXHIBIT 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



As of October 1, 2005 the Companys subsidiaries, all wholly-owned and incorporated in California (except where noted otherwise) were:



|         |  |                                              
|-------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|         |  | Banner Marketing, Inc.                       
|         |  | Certified Grocers of California, Ltd.        
|(4)      |  | United Grocers, Inc.                         
|         |  | Grocers and Merchants Insurance Service, Inc.
|         |  | Grocers Capital Company                      
|         |  | Grocers Specialty Company                    
|         |  | Grocers Development Center, Inc.             
|         |  | Preferred Public Storage Company             
|         |  | Crown Grocers, Inc.                          
|         |  | Grocers General Merchandise Company          
|(1)      |  | Unified International, Inc.                  
|(2)      |  | Grocers and Merchants Management Company     
|(2)      |  | Springfield Insurance Company                
|(3)      |  | SavMax Foods, Inc.                           
|(4)      |  | Northwest Process, Inc.                      
|(4)      |  | R&R Liquidating Corporation                  
|(4)      |  | U.G. Resources, Inc.                         
|(4)      |  | United Resources, Inc.                       
|(4)      |  | Western Security Services, Ltd.              
|(4)      |  | Western Passage Express, Ltd.                
|(2), (5) |  | Springfield Insurance Company Limited        

---

|(1) |  | Incorporated in Delaware
|--- |  | ------------------------

|(2) |  | Outstanding capital shares are owned by Grocers and Merchants Insurance Services, Inc.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) |  | Outstanding capital shares are owned by Crown Grocers, Inc.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------

|(4) |  | Incorporated in Oregon
|--- |  | ----------------------

|(5) |  | Incorporated in Bermuda
|--- |  | -----------------------
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 1-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 1-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 1-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 1-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 1-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 1-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 1-9 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 7 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03334-LBS Document 2 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
Filed 7/1/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2015 ND 159

Spencer Kerry Curtiss, Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20150007

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Lee Michael Grossman, 341 Central Avenue North, Suite 3, P.O. Box 475, Valley City, N.D. 58072, for petitioner and appellant; on brief.

Pamela Ann Nesvig, Assistant State’s Attorney, Burleigh County Courthouse, P.O. Box 5518, Bismarck, N.D. 58506-5518, for respondent and appellee; on brief.

Curtiss v. State

No. 20150007

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Spencer Curtiss appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief on his conviction for gross sexual imposition.  Curtiss claims he was entitled to post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel.  He also argues that by allowing the introduction of testimony regarding his religious beliefs, the district court denied him his constitutional rights and prejudiced him throughout the trial proceedings.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding that after holding an evidentiary hearing, the district court denied Curtiss’s post-conviction relief application on the basis of findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Carol Ronning Kapsner
EXHIBIT 21
      [Annual Report on Form 10-K]

      EVERGREEN BANCORP, INC.
1997 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

 Name of Significant Subsidiary<F1>     % Owned      Jurisdiction of Incorporation
<S>                                     <C>          <C>
Evergreen Bank, National Association    100          United States
Evergreen Realty Funding Corp.<F2>      100          New York

<FN>

<F1>  Subsidiaries of the Registrant that are inactive have been omitted.
<F2>  Entity is a Subsidiary of Evergreen Bank, National association.
</FN>
</TABLE>
Case 7:07-cv-03249-CLB Document 5 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03249-CLB Document 5 Filed 07/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
** Exhibit      32.1**

|                                        |                                       |                                    |
|---------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                        |                                       |
|                                   |                                  |                               |
| Dated: September              12, 2007 | By:                              | /s/ William              W. Priest |
|                                        | William              W. Priest             |
|                                        | Chief              Executive Officer       |
|                                        | (Principal              Executive Officer) |

|                                        |                                       |                             |
|---------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                                   |                                  |                        |
| Dated: September              12, 2007 | By:                              | /s/ Adam              Borak |
|                                        | Adam              Borak                    |
|                                        | Chief              Financial Officer       |
|                                        | (Principal              Financial Officer) |

----
Case 1:07-cv-03347-DC Document 19 Filed 04/21/2008 Page 1 of 1