alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS | Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation (DEEOIC)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation (DEEOIC)

Enroll as an OWCP Physician Provider

Help OWCP serve current and former workers who suffered 

work-related illnesses.

• The Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation

(DEEOIC) understands the importance of developing and

maintaining solid relationships with healthcare providers, as well as

the barriers that former nuclear weapons workers face in accessing

healthcare services for covered conditions. We’re committed to

supporting healthcare providers in providing quality care and services.

As an enrolled provider, you can access eligibility, claim status, and

authorizations information online.

• Claimants may use the doctor of their choosing, including their

primary care physician. Once you enroll and begin submitting bills, you 

can choose to have potential future patients find you through our

provider search feature on the web portal.

• Once registered, electronic payment is seamless.  We

process more than half of all bills within 15 days, 80% of bills

in 28 days.

• OWCP pays better than Medicare, typically 47% higher. The fee

schedule is published online at: www.dol.gov/agencies/owcp/regs/

feeschedule/fee.

• You can submit bills electronically via Electronic Data Interchange

(EDI) and online through the web portal. A paper option is also

available.

• Easy to enroll at: https://owcpmed.dol.gov/. Just fill out

an enrollment form to show you are licensed to provide care in the

state you work in and other basic information.

• The web portal (https://owcpmed.dol.gov/) provides access

to training and tutorials.

• Medical bill call center support is available at

(866) 272-2682. Additional support is also available

to triage complex billing issues through DEEOIC Resource Center staff 

(http://www.dol.gov/EnergyProgramResourceCenters).

• Most accepted claims provide permanent medical benefits for

claimants to treat approved conditions. Treatments for the conditions

are covered without extensive reassessments from the physician.

www.dol.gov/agencies/owcp/energy/medicalproviders
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 17-3      Filed 02/01/2005     Page 1 of 6

Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 17-3      Filed 02/01/2005     Page 2 of 6

Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 17-3      Filed 02/01/2005     Page 3 of 6

Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 17-3      Filed 02/01/2005     Page 4 of 6

Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 17-3      Filed 02/01/2005     Page 5 of 6

Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 17-3      Filed 02/01/2005     Page 6 of 6
****Exhibit 31.2****
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 I, Amir Rosenthal, certify that:1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10--Q of Katy Industries, Inc.;2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a--15(e) and 15d--15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
[Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33--8238; 34--47986 Section III.E.];(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and5.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 
 
 Date: November 10, 2004
By:
/s/ Amir Rosenthal
Amir Rosenthal
Chief Financial Officer 
 
 43
Case 1:07-cr-00352-PAC     Document 9      Filed 07/19/2007     Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 11







BAIRNCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES



CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE



FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2002 AND 2001





|                                           | 2003             | 2002             | 2001             
|------------------------------------------ | ---------------- | ---------------- | -----------------
|BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:    |                  |                  |                  
|                                           |                  |                  |                  
|Net Income (Loss)                          | $  2,649,000     | $  1,361,000     | $  (308,000)     
|                                           |                  |                  |                  
|Weighted-average common shares outstanding | 7,338,000        | 7,332,000        | 7,321,000        
|                                           |                  |                  |                  
|Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share     | $           0.36 | $           0.19 | $        (0.04)  
|                                           |                  |                  |                  
|                                           |                  |                  |                  
|DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:  |                  |                  |                  
|                                           |                  |                  |                  
|Net Income (Loss)                          | $  2,649,000     | $  1,361,000     | $  (308,000)     
|                                           |                  |                  |                  
|Weighted-average common shares outstanding | 7,338,000        | 7,332,000        | 7,321,000        
|Dilutive Effect of Restricted Stock        | 32,000           | --               | --               
|Common shares issuable in respect to       |                  |                  |                  
|Options issued to employees                |                  |                  |                  
|with a dilutive effect                     | 21,000           | 5,000            | --               
|Total common shares assuming full dilution | 7,391,000        | 7,337,000        | 7,321,000        
|                                           |                  |                  |                  
|Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share   | $          0.36  | $          0.19  | $          (0.04)
|                                           |                  |                  |                  





Basic earnings (loss) per common share were computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each year. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share includes the effect of all dilutive stock options except in 2001 because to do so would be antidilutive.
E2 Solutions Travel Authorization

Itinerary

Estimated Expense Totals

Accounting Information

Remarks

Audit/Approver Information

Traveler Official Duty Station Authorization Id

PATRICK PIZZELLA Washington, DC 10490818

Trip Status Type of Travel Document Number

Revoked Authorization Informational Meeting A010490818

Travel Purpose

Travel with VPOTUS via AF2.

Arrive Depart Time Location Car Hotel Mode Notes

2019-08-01 2019-08-01 07:00 AM Washington, DC NONE No GP

2019-08-01 2019-08-01 Hagerstown, MD GOV No GA Temporary Duty, LDG $94, M&IE $55

2019-08-01 2019-08-01 03:00 PM Washington, DC NONE No NONE

Notes: GA = Govt Auto, GP = Govt Plane

Transport Lodging M&IE Car Rental Local Transport POV Misc Total

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.51 15.51

Accounting String CBA Amount TCC Amount Traveler Amount Total Amount

15.51 0.00 0.00 15.51

15.51 0.00 0.00 15.51

Date/Time Author Remark

2019-08-30 01:08 PM Approver - DEBUSK, THOMAS

N

Voucher Remarks - Voucher ID: 10490818 - No expenses incurred. No need to

voucher. No cost to DOL.

2019-08-29 08:16 PM Traveler - PIZZELLA, PATRICK Voucher Remarks - Voucher ID: 10490818(1) - I hereby assign to the United States any

right I may have against any parties in connection with reimbursable transportation

charges described below, purchased under cash payment procedures (41CFR 101-

41.203-2). I certify that this voucher is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and

belief, and that payment or credit has not been received by me.

Date/Time Official Action

Requested By: Signature: Date:

Authorized By: Signature: Date:

Generated from E2 Solutions on: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:46:42 CDT Page 1 of 1

(b) (5)
E2 Solutions Travel Authorization

Itinerary

Estimated Expense Totals

Accounting Information

Remarks

Audit/Approver Information

Traveler Official Duty Station Authorization Id

PATRICK PIZZELLA Washington, DC 10558719

Trip Status Type of Travel Document Number

Revoked Authorization Informational Meeting A010558719

Travel Purpose

Travel with VPOTUS via AF2.

Arrive Depart Time Location Car Hotel Mode Notes

2019-08-26 2019-08-26 12:00 PM Washington, DC NONE No GP

2019-08-26 2019-08-26 Anderson, SC NONE No GP Temporary Duty, LDG $94, M&IE $55

2019-08-26 2019-08-26 09:00 PM Washington, DC NONE No NONE

Notes: GP = Govt Plane

Transport Lodging M&IE Car Rental Local Transport POV Misc Total

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 65.51 65.51

Accounting String CBA Amount TCC Amount Traveler Amount Total Amount

15.51 0.00 50.00 65.51

15.51 0.00 50.00 65.51

Date/Time Author Remark

No Remarks found for this or associated documents.

Date/Time Official Action

Requested By: Signature: Date:

Authorized By: Signature: Date:

Generated from E2 Solutions on: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:47:59 CDT Page 1 of 1

(b) (5)
### 21- 

## ZgZ 9 Z

# FILED OCT012021 No. 83496

ELVA TH A. BROWN OLE 0 -UPREME COURT BY E Ty cLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion to quash or cancel restitution. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michael Villani, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion to quash or cancel restitution, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

J.

cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Michael Anthony Gonzalez Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

At,

--- SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA i0) I947A MICHAEL ANTHONY GONZALEZ, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
**Exhibit 31.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Andrew C. Schmidt, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Iteris, Inc. for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 (this “Report”); and

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report.

 

Date: July 30, 2018

 
|     | /s/ ANDREW C. SCHMIDT           |
|----------|---------------------------------|
|     | Andrew C. Schmidt               |
| * * | *Chief Financial Officer*       |
| * * | *(Principal Financial Officer)* |

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 10-3 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 10-3 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 10-3 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 10-3 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 10-3 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 10-3 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 10-3 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 10-3 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 8 of 8
UNL'I'LL) S'l'A'l'LS IIISTRICT COUK'I' 

SOUTHERN DISTRIC'S 01: NEW YORK 

IN RE: 

i hl:ZSTER FILE 

FOSAMAX PKOLl1!C'TS LIABILITY L,lTIGA'I'lON 

1 106-M 11- 1 789 (JFK) 

'177i.~ Llocuntent Keicrles To All Ac1ion.c 

ORDER FOR .4DhIISSION PRO HAG VICE 

Considering the Cerlijicate 01' Good Standing and ol l othcr docut~~cnts rcquired by Case 

Management Order No. 5 submitted by counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

..ll-'pl icant's Name: Kathlccn Sullivan Hardway UC-' r;srz,L *--I--- ---- 

Firm N;~mt.: Venable LLP 

Address: -1'tvo I Iopkins Plaza. Suite 1 800 

1 

CityIStatclZip: Haltimore. Maryland 2 1201 . w ,--- -- , ) 

3 -/y-u3 f 

_--..--....-- ii L-.- - .' "---"--urn"- 

-- .AIWI 

.I TelephoneTax: (4 1 0) 244-7400/(4 10) 244-7742 

Email Address: k shard~~-ay51::ve11able.com 

is acimilted to practice pro har \ icc as counsel lbr hIt.1-c.k & Co.. Iric. in the ahoi r. c:iptioned case 

in the I!nited Statcs I)isrric~ C'our~ fill- the Southern District of New York. 

New Yorli. Neu 1'~lrk 

d' 

r - 

(/ Il'nited States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03296-JFK Document 19 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Good 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DISTRICT OF MARYLAND 

I, Felicia C. Cannon, Clerk of the United States District Court for the District 

of hlaryland, 

DO HEREBY CERTIFY that, KATHLEEY F. SCLLI17AN, 

ESQUIRE, BAR NUMBER 25406, was duly admitted to practice in the 

United States District Court for the District of Mar?land on September I I, 1998, 

and is currently in good standing as a member of the bar of this Court. 

Dated at Baltimore, Maryland FEI,ICIA C. CANNOY 

Clerk 

Tina Stavrou - Deputy Clerk 

Case 1:07-cv-03296-JFK Document 19 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 2 of 2
Order entered August 14, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01317-CV

THE ESTATE OF MAX D. HOPPER, DECEASED

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR-11-03238-1

ORDER

By order dated July 23, 2019, we struck volumes 10, 12-15, 17-18, and 20 of the 

reporter’s record and ordered the court reporter to file, by August 12, 2019, corrected volumes 

incorporating into each of those volumes the contents of the video clips as identified by the 

parties in their stipulation. Before the Court is the request of Jackie Galindo, Official Court 

Reporter for Probate Court No. 1, for a two-week extension of time to comply with this Court’s 

July 23rd order. We GRANT the request and extend the time to August 26, 2019.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Galindo and all 

parites.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
#### STATE v. REAVES

No. 12 PC.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 476.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 3 October 1972.
#### Jerry GUYTON; Mark Ebner; Wayne Guyton; Dale Brown; Garry Krueger; Randy Rhodes, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Appellants, v. THE SCHWAN FOOD COMPANY, INC.; Schwan’s Home Service, Inc.; Schwan’s Sales Enterprises, Inc., Appellees.

No. 04-1790.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 17, 2004.

Decided Feb. 7, 2005.

*85Frank Vogl, Best & Flanagan, Minneapolis, MN, Mark R. Thierman, Micheline N. Fairbank, Thierman Law Firm, Reno, NV, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

H. Allen Blair, III, Greene & Espel, Minneapolis, MN, Alan L. Rupe, Kutak & Rock, Wichita, KS, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before WOLLMAN, MAGILL, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Jerry Guyton, Mark Ebner, Wayne Guyton, Dale Brown, Garry Krueger, and Randy Rhodes, sales managers for Schwan’s Home Service, Inc., a subsidiary of The Schwan Food Company, Inc. (collectively “Schwan”), appeal the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in their action seeking overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) for time worked over forty hours per week. *See*29 U.S.C. § 207(a)(1). The district court granted summary judgment to Schwan on the basis that sales managers are exempt from overtime pay under the Motor Carrier Act exemption to the FLSA. *See id.*§ 213(b)(1); 29 C.F.R. § 782.2(a). Specifically, the district court found that (1) Schwan’s “fixed and persisting intent at the time of shipment” is to transport property in interstate commerce, *Roberts v. Levine,*921 F.2d 804, 813 (8th Cir.1990), and (2) sales managers are called upon to perform safety-affecting activities “from time to time,” 29 C.F.R. § 782.2(b)(3).

Having carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs, the record, and the applicable law, we conclude that this case is directly controlled by *Roberts*and that the district court properly granted summary judgment to Schwan. Because we have nothing to add to the district court’s explanation, we affirm on the basis of the district court’s memorandum and order. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Recent News & Stories             
  -  News Releases             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Soldier Accounted For From Korean War (Lee, C.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Exhibit 10.24**EMULEX CORPORATION****Description of Compensation Arrangements with Non-Employee Directors**     The following is a description of the compensation arrangements for the non-employee directorsof Emulex Corporation (the “Company”).     *Directors’ Fees.*Directors who are not employees of the Company receive a quarterly retainerof $7,500 and reimbursement for travel expenses. In addition, the chairmen of theNominating/Corporate Governance and Compensation Committees receives an additional quarterlyretainer of $1,250, while committee members receive an additional quarterly retainer of $1,000, andthe chairman of the Audit Committee receives an additional quarterly retainer of $2,500 whilecommittee members receive an additional quarterly retainer of $2,000. Directors who are employeesof the Company receive no additional compensation for serving on the Board of Directors. Directorsare entitled to reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attendance at Board andcommittee meetings.     *Stock Options.*Upon becoming a director of the Company, a non-employee director receives anautomatic grant of an option under the Emulex Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan for Non-EmployeeDirectors (the “Director Plan”) to purchase 60,000 shares of common stock of the Company at apurchase price equal to the fair market value per share of that stock on the date of grant of theoption. Under the terms of the Director Plan, the option would vest as to one-third of the shareson each anniversary of the grant date if the director is still a director on those dates and willexpire one year after she or he ceases to be a director. In addition, the Director Plan providesfor automatic annual option grants to non-employee directors of 20,000 shares of common stock,which grants will occur on each yearly anniversary of the director’s commencement date as adirector. The Director Plan is incorporated by reference to Appendix C to the Company’s DefinitiveProxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on November 18, 2004.     *Indemnification*. In addition to the indemnification afforded to directors under Delaware lawand the Company’s Bylaws, the Company typically enters into an indemnification agreement with a newdirector upon his or her appointment as a director. The form of the indemnification agreement isattached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 17, 2005. TheCompany also maintains directors and officers liability insurance.