alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NYC W ~PFIRTMEM Fax :2127880940 Oct 22 2007 2:36 P. 02 

:i no- 

; \)" ,< h. E~~Q~~~~LFmm 

w ii 

: : x-". iyf-b 4g* - : - ,,f.:,~v w* ,' 

: , ; > 5-3 .iq,-E m: THE CITY OF NEW YORK + 

- A ! L.*~--~--~' 

LAW DEPARTMENT --+'" TOM G= 

October 22,2007 

Courthouse 

d.4- &wu 63 

Re: Bush V. 07 Civ. 3231 .@JS) 0 

d I am the Assistant Corporation Counsel assigned to "present Deparbment of 

Cdon ommissioner Martin F- Hom and Assistant Duputy Wda Clayton N. Augustus, 

City defendants in the abav~rcfawwd rnm. 

1 write to request pdsion to serve a We mer on behalf of defet 

date to respond was June 20, 2007. I respedblly ask that the Court 

defemhnt Augustus's request for 

plaintiff will not be prejudiced. This is the ' such request 

Although 1 have been unable to contact plaintiff, who is 

se, rming chis rqW, he had prcvio~sly ccrnmted to 

anma on or before October 3 1,2007 (a stipulation to 

review *nd sndorscmmxt}. I mpm1y request 

defendant Augustus on the same data. The 

with him regarding plainws allegations, to 

raponse. 

Thank you for your cmi-on of tbis reque. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Toni Ean~s: 

Assistant Corporation Couml 

Case 1:07-cv-03231-RJS-FM Document 24 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 1 of 1
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Dawson Geophysical Company (the Company) on Form
10-K/A for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I L. Decker Dawson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: February 28, 2005 /s/ L. Decker DawsonChairman and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Pacific Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:     December 20, 2010
    By:
    /s/  DANA M. KELLEYDana M. Kelley, Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer and Treasurer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael REDE-TORRES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-51102.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided April 20, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*623Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Rafael Rede-Torres raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 212 (Thursday, November 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66902-66903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22016]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: United States Institute of Peace.

Date/Time: Thursday, November 17, 2005, 9:15 a.m.-3:30 p.m.

location: 1200 17th Street, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036-3011.

Status: Open Session--Portions may be closed pursuant to subsection (c) 
of section 552(b) of Title 5, United States Code, as provided in 
subsection 1706(h)(3) of the United States Institute of Peace Act, 
Public Law 98-525.

Agenda: November 2005 Board Meeting; Approval of Minutes of the One 
Hundred Twentieth Meeting (September 22, 2005) of the Board of 
Directors; Chairman's Report; President's Report; Fiscal Year 2007 
Budget Submission to OMB; Selection of NPEC topic; Grants Program 
Restructure; Other General Issues.

[[Page 66903]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tessie Higgs, Executive Office, 
Telephone: (202) 429-3836.

    Dated: October 31, 2005.
Patricia P. Thomson,
Executive Vice President, United States Institute of Peace.
[FR Doc. 05-22016 Filed 11-1-05; 12:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M
EXHIBIT 11







BAIRNCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES



CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE



FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001, 2000 AND 1999





|                                           | 2001              | 2000             | 1999            
|------------------------------------------ | ----------------- | ---------------- | ----------------
|BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:    |                   |                  |                 
|                                           |                   |                  |                 
|Net Income (Loss)                          | $  (308,000)      | $  8,233,000     | $  8,641,000    
|                                           |                   |                  |                 
|Weighted-average common shares outstanding | 7,321,000         | 7,567,000        | 7,965,000       
|                                           |                   |                  |                 
|Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share     | $        (0.04)   | $           1.09 | $           1.08
|                                           |                   |                  |                 
|                                           |                   |                  |                 
|DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:  |                   |                  |                 
|                                           |                   |                  |                 
|Net Income (Loss)                          | $  (308,000)      | $  8,233,000     | $  8,641,000    
|                                           |                   |                  |                 
|Weighted-average common shares outstanding | 7,321,000         | 7,567,000        | 7,965,000       
|Common shares issuable in respect to       |                   |                  |                 
|Options issued to employees                |                   |                  |                 
|with a dilutive effect                     | --                | 111,000          | 73,000          
|Total common shares assuming full dilution | 7,321,000         | 7,678,000        | 8,038,000       
|                                           |                   |                  |                 
|Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share   | $          (0.04) | $           1.07 | $           1.08
|                                           |                   |                  |                 





Basic earnings (loss) per common share were computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each year. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share includes the effect of all dilutive stock options except in 2001 because to do so would be antidilutive.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 223 (Monday, November 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 70084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22975]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection


Annual User Fee for Customs Broker Permit and National Permit; 
General Notice

AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of Due Date for Customs Broker User Fee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is to advise Customs brokers that the annual fee of $125 
that is assessed for each permit held by a broker whether it may be an 
individual, partnership, association or corporation, is due by January 
20, 2006. This announcement is being published to comply with the Tax 
Reform Act of 1986.

DATES: Due date for payment of fee: January 20, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Russell Morris, Broker Management 
Branch, (202) 344-2717.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 13031 of the Consolidated Omnibus 
Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (Pub. L. 99-272) established that an 
annual user fee of $125 is to be assessed for each Customs broker 
permit and National permit held by an individual, partnership, 
association or corporation. This fee is set forth in the Customs 
Regulations in section 111.96 (19 CFR 111.96).
    Customs Regulations provide that this fee is payable for each 
calendar year in each broker district where the broker was issued a 
permit to do business by the due date which will be published in the 
Federal Register annually. Broker districts are defined in the General 
Notice published in the Federal Register, Volume 60, No. 187, September 
27, 1995.
    Section 1893 of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-514) 
provides that notices of the date on which the payment is due for each 
broker permit shall be published by the Secretary of the Treasury in 
the Federal Register by no later than 60 days before such due date.
    This document notifies brokers that for 2006, the due date of the 
user fee is January 20, 2006. It is expected that the annual user fees 
for brokers for subsequent years will be due on or about the twentieth 
of January of each year.

    Dated: November 14, 2005.
Jayson P. Ahern,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations.
[FR Doc. 05-22975 Filed 11-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
Case 1:06-cv-15031-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15027-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT **COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**JEFFREY CRISTINA,**

**Petitioner :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **No. 183 WAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the**  Published Opinion and Order **of the Superior Court at No. 601 WDA 2013,**  **at 114**  **A.3d 419**  **(Pa. Super. 2015)**  **exited** April 14 , 201 5 **,** reversing **the Order**  **of the**  **Allegheny County**  **Court of Common**  **Pleas at**  **Nos. CP-02-CR-0001478-1976,**  **CP-02-CR-0002462-1976 and**  **CP-02**

- **0002464-1976 exited**  **March 20,**  2013.

ORDER

P E R CURIAM AND NOW **, this 11th day of February, 2016, The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is**  GRANTED **on the issue of whether Petitioner’s sentence violates the prohibition against mandatory life sentences for juvenile offenders announced by the Supreme**  **Court of the United States in** Miller v. Alabama **, 567 U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012). As a result of the recent holding by that Court that**  Miller **must be applied retroactively by the States,**  see Montgomery v. Louisiana **, 2016 WL 280758 (U.S. Jan. 25, 2016), the Superior Court’s order is**  VACATED **, and the case is** REMANDED **for further proceedings consistent with**  Montgomery

**. To the extent necessary, leave is to be granted to amend the post-conviction**  **petition to assert the jurisdictional provision of the Post Conviction Relief Act extending to the recognition of constitutional rights by the Supreme Court of the United States**  **which it deems to to be retroactive.** See **42 Pa.C.S. §9545(b)(1)(iii). Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this**  **matter.**
Exhibit 32.2 KNIGHT INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 
OF THE 
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knight Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Knight Inc. and will be retained by Knight Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   Dated:  August
	9, 2007/s/ Kimberly A. DangKimberly A. Dang
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide              
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.04 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
# L_2007064EN.01002901.xml

| 2.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 64/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 64/29

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 227/2007

of 1 March 2007

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 936/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/2006 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/2006 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 23 February to 1 March 2007 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 936/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 2 March 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 March 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 172, 24.6.2006, p. 6.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
Motion Denied; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 2 , 2012

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00078

- CV

LINDA BRUEGGEBORS , Appellant

V.

KINGWOOD SENIOR VILL AGE , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law #4 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11

- 25,852



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 9 , 201 2 . The clerk’s record was
filed March 21 , 2012. No reporter’s record was filed.
Appellant’s brief was originally due May 14, 2012

. We granted three extensions of time to file appellant’s brief until August 13, 2012. No brief was filed. On August 14, 2012, appellant filed a further request for extension of time to file her brief. On August 23, 2012, the request was denied and appellant was ordered to file a brief with the clerk of this court within thirty (30) days. Appellant was informed that if she did not2

timely file the brief as ordered, the court w ould dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App . P. 42.3(b).
On September 24, 2012, appellant filed another request to extend time to file her
brief. Appellant’s motion is denied.

T he appeal is ordered dismissed for want of prosecution

.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christophe r , and Jamison.