alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23 ---- CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


    We  consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) of Intergraph Corporation and subsidiaries of
our  report  dated January 29, 1998 (except for paragraph  2  of
Note 15, as to which the date is March 2, 1998), included in the
1997 Annual Report to Shareholders of Intergraph Corporation.

    Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of
Intergraph  Corporation listed in Item 14(a)(2).  This  schedule
is   the  responsibility  of  the  Company's  management.    Our
responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.  In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when  considered  in relation to the basic financial  statements
taken  as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects  the
information set forth herein.

    We  also  consent to the incorporation by reference  in  the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-25880) pertaining to the
Stock  Bonus  Plan dated December 22, 1988; in the  Registration
Statement  (Form S-8 No. 33-53849) pertaining to the  Intergraph
Corporation  1992 Stock Option Plan dated May 27, 1994;  in  the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-57211) pertaining to the
Assumption of Options under the InterCAP Graphics Systems,  Inc.
1989  Stock  Option  Plan  and 1994  Nonqualified  Stock  Option
Program  dated  January 10, 1995; in the Registration  Statement
(Form  S-8  No.  33-59621) pertaining  to  the  1995  Intergraph
Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan dated May 26, 1995; and
in  the  related Prospectuses, of our report dated  January  29,
1998 (except for paragraph 2 of Note 15, as to which the date is
March  2,  1998),  with  respect to the  consolidated  financial
statements   and   schedule   of  Intergraph   Corporation   and
subsidiaries included or incorporated by reference in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.


                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Birmingham, Alabama

March 27, 1998
#### Kheang Chhay TRAN, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-73473.

Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*150Submitted March 23, 2005.**

Decided April 4, 2005.

Kheang Chhay Tran, Ontario, CA, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, Esq., Anthony W. Nor-wood, Esq., DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto R. Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Kheang Chhay Tran, a native and citizen of Cambodia, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of a motion to reopen his removal proceedings based on changed circumstances in Cambodia. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, *see Singh v. INS,*213 F.3d 1050, 1052 (9th Cir.2000), we deny the petition.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the “changes claimed by the respondent do not establish that he is reasonably likely to suffer harm in a form different from the general population in [Cambodia].” The human rights reports submitted by Tran state that some of his political party’s candidates for office were harmed. They do not mention less prominent party affiliates, such as Tran claims to be, or individuals associated with Prince Norodom Ranariddh. The BIA was therefore justified in denying the motion to reopen. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1) (“A motion to reopen proceedings shall not be granted unless it appears to the Board that evidence sought to be offered is material....”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TRINIDAD TEPALE,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-73547

Agency No. A088-448-747

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 18, 2014** 

Before: LEAVY, FISHER, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Trinidad Tepale, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for withholding of

FILED

NOV 24 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition for

review and remand.

Tepale fears future persecution in Mexico by gangs. In denying Tepale’s

withholding of removal claim, the agency found Tepale failed to establish a fear of

future persecution on account of a protected ground. When the IJ and BIA issued

their decisions in this case, they did not have the benefit of this court’s decisions in

Henriquez-Rivas v. Holder, 707 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2013) (en banc), Cordoba v.

Holder, 726 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2013), and Pirir-Boc v. Holder, 750 F.3d 1077

(9th Cir. 2014), or the BIA’s decisions in Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 227

(BIA 2014), and Matter of W-G-R-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 208 (BIA 2014). Thus, we

remand Tepale’s withholding of removal claim to determine the impact, if any, of

these decisions. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

2 10-73547
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of HEI, Inc. (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mack
V. Traynor, III, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Mack V. Traynor, III
Mack V. Traynor, III
Chief Executive Officer and President Date: January 13, 2005   *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to HEI, Inc. and will be retained by HEI, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 3 of 3
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS Oklahoma Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Day, F.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
SOUTHWESTERN RESOURCES CORP.



[ex1000002.gif]



MEMORANDUM





|         |                                                               
|-------- | --------------------------------------------------------------
|To:      | All Southwestern Resources Insiders, Employees and Consultants
|         |                                                               
|From:    | Thomas W. Beattie                                             
|         |                                                               
|Date:    | June 27, 2007                                                 
|         |                                                               
|Subject: | Blackout Period for Trading in the Companys Shares           





Southwestern Resources advises, effective immediately, that all insiders, employees and consultants are prohibited from buying or selling the Companys shares or exercising stock options.



The Companys Disclosure and Stock Trading Policy, adopted by the Board in May 2007, states that:



Insiders (primarily directors and officers), employees and consultants with access to undisclosed material information concerning the Company are prohibited from trading in the Companys securities until the information has been fully disclosed and a reasonable period of time has passed for the information to be disseminated.



The Company will circulate another memorandum when the blackout period for trading in the Companys shares is lifted.



Please contact me should you have any questions regarding the prohibition on trading or require a copy of the Companys Disclosure and Stock Trading Policy.









P.O. Box 10102  #1650, 701 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, B.C.  Canada  V7Y 1C6

Telephone (604) 669 2525   Fax (604) 688 5175
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>              5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Jaclyn, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>           1
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             2,537
<SECURITIES>                                       3,582
<RECEIVABLES>                                      6,873
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                        5,620
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  21,495
<PP&E>                                             1,610
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     1,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              4,966
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           3,369
<OTHER-SE>                                        14,207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      24,725
<SALES>                                           13,778
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  13,855
<CGS>                                              9,758
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      3,982
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      114
<INCOME-TAX>                                          46
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   68
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                          68
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.02
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1422

LORIA A. PATTERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KATHLEEN BEETHAM, Manager of Interpreters,

Inc.; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, James B. Hunt,

Governor; JACKIE MCNEIL, Chief of Police of

Durham Police Department; ORVILLE POWELL, City

Manager of the City of Durham,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District

Judge. (CA-96-1061-5-BO-3)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 27, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Loria A. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying leave to

proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing her civil action. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. The district court's order is modified to reflect

that the dismissal is without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106

(1994). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court, as

modified. Patterson v. Beetham, No. CA-96-1061-5-BO-3 (E.D.N.C.

Feb. 25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
Loan Agreement


Exhibit 10.3

Loan Agreement




Between Epsom Investment Services NV (“Epsom”) and Rival Technologies Inc. (“Rival”)




The parties hereby agree as follows:




1.

Rival has an existing debt owing to Epsom of US$500,000 plus interest, payable ON DEMAND in accordance with the terms of the Convertible Promissory Note dated August 1, 2007, as amended.




2.

Epsom has agreed to extend to Rival an additional loan of up to US$100,000, as required over the coming 12 months to pay ongoing debts owing to auditors, legal counsel, transfer agent, and other creditors approved in writing by Epsom. This additional loan may be advanced in stages.




3.

The loans, including principal and interest outstanding, referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 above are herein referred to as the “Loan”.




4.

Epsom may secure the Loans at any time by registering same in a first secured position as a secured creditor of Rival and Rival hereby agrees to execute and register such documentation as may be required to give effect to this secured position of Epsom.




5.

Rival agrees that it will not issue any further capital stock (including warrants or options) or debt without the express written consent of Epsom, for such period of time as the Loans are outstanding.




This Amendment may be sign in counterpart and delivered by facsimile.




Dated July 2, 2009




Rival Technologies Inc.

Epsom Investment Services NV













Per: /s/Douglas Thomas

Per: ­­­­­­­­­­/s/ D. Craven
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.3


                     AMENDMENTS TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
                               BYLAWS OF HEI, INC.
                        (EFFECTIVE AS OF MARCH 19, 2003)


A new Section 3.14 has been added:

                  Section 3.14. Chairman of the Board. The Chairman of the
         Board, if one is elected by the Board of Directors, shall preside at
         all meetings of the shareholders and directors and shall have such
         other duties as may be prescribed, from time to time, by the Board of
         Directors. The Chairman of the Board shall not be deemed to be an
         officer or employee of the corporation solely by serving as the
         Chairman of the Board.

Section 4.01 has been deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

                  Section 4.01. Officers. The officers of the corporation shall
         consist of a Chief Executive Officer, a Chief Financial Officer, a
         Secretary and such other officers and agents as may, from time to time,
         be elected or appointed by the Board of Directors. Any number of
         offices may be held by the same person.

Section 4.04 of the Bylaws is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:

                  Section 4.04.  [Reserved.]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

BUTLER COUNTY REPUBLICAN 

COMMITTEE,

Respondents

v.

WILLIAM (BILL) HALLE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 97 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
S. 163 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

An Act 

To prevent catastrophic failure or shutdown of remote diesel power engines due 

to emission control devices, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alaska Remote Generator Reliability and Protection Act’’. 

SEC. 2. REVISION OF REGULATIONS REQUIRED. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the Environmental 

Protection Agency shall revise section 60.4216(c) of title 40, Code 

of Federal Regulations (as in effect on the date of enactment of 

this Act), by striking ‘‘that was not certified’’ and all that follows 

through ‘‘compared to engine-out emissions’’ and inserting ‘‘must 

have that engine certified as meeting at least Tier 3 PM standards’’. 

(b) EMISSIONS AND ENERGY RELIABILITY STUDY.—Not later than 

1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator 

of the Environmental Protection Agency, in consultation with the 

Secretary of Energy, shall submit to the Committee on Environment 

and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report assessing 

options for the Federal Government to assist remote areas in the 

State of Alaska in meeting the energy needs of those areas in 

an affordable and reliable manner using— 

(1) existing emissions control technology; or 
S. 163—2 

(2) other technology that achieves emissions reductions 

similar to the technology described in paragraph (1). 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1557 

To establish a grant program to incentivize States to reduce prison 

populations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2019 

Mr. BOOKER (for himself and Mr. BLUMENTHAL) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To establish a grant program to incentivize States to reduce 

prison populations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reverse Mass Incarcer5 ation Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GRANT PROGRAM. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title I of the Omnibus Crime 

8 Control and Safe Street Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10101 

9 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1557 IS

1 ‘‘PART OO—STATE PRISON POPULATION 

2 REDUCTION GRANT PROGRAM 

3 ‘‘SEC. 3051. GRANT PROGRAM. 

4 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General may make 

5 grants to States to assist States in reducing crime rates 

6 and incarcerations. 

7 ‘‘(b) ELIGIBILITY.—A State shall be eligible to re8 ceive a grant under this section if the State demonstrates 

9 that, during the 3-year period preceding the application 

10 for a grant under this section— 

11 ‘‘(1) the total number of individuals incarcer12 ated in correctional or detention facilities in the 

13 State was reduced by not less than 7 percent; and 

14 ‘‘(2) the rate of crime within the State did not 

15 increase by more than 3 percent. 

16 ‘‘(c) APPLICATION.—An eligible State seeking a 

17 grant under this section shall submit to the Attorney Gen18 eral an application in such form and manner and at such 

19 time as the Attorney General requires, which shall include 

20 a clear methodology based on population size and other 

21 factors. 

22 ‘‘(d) USE OF GRANT FUNDS.—A grant awarded 

23 under this section shall be used by a State to implement 

24 evidence-based programs designed to reduce crime rates 

25 and incarcerations.’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1557 IS

1 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

2 1001(a) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 

3 Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10261(a)) is amended by 

4 adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(29) There are authorized to be appropriated to 

6 carry out part OO $2,000,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

7 2020 through 2029.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Case 1:06-cv-15128-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1