Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 223 / Monday, November 21, 2005 / Notices 70099 

RHODE ISLAND 

Providence County 

Wayland Historic District, Roughly bounded 

by Arlington and Laurel Aves. Weymouth 

St., Blackstone Blvd., Butler Ave., Angell 

and S. Angell Sts., Providence, 05001399. 

TEXAS 

Bexar County 

Floore Country Store, 14492 Old Bandera 

Rd., Helotes, 05001402. 

Hood County 

Baker—Carmichael House, 226 E. Pearl St., 

Granbury, 05001401. 

Smith County 

Cotton Belt Building, (Tyler, Texas MPS), 

1517 W. Front St., Tyler, 05001405. 

Martin Hall at Texas College, (Tyler, Texas 

MPS), 2404 N. Grand Ave., Tyler, 

05001404. 

St. John’s AF & AM Lodge, 323 W. Front St., 

Tyler, 05001403. 

TEXAS 

Starr County 

Guerra, Fred and Nell Kain, House, (Rio 

Grande City, Starr County, Texas MPS), 

800 Blk. W Main, Rio Grande City, 

05001400. 

A request for REMOVAL has been for the 

following resources: 

SOUTH CAROLINA 

Anderson County 

McFall House, SR 247, Anderson vicinity, 

82003829. 

Prevost, Nick, House, 105 N. Prevost St., 

Anderson, 84002020. 

Berkeley County 

Calais Milestones, On CR 98 and 44, Cainhoy 

vicinity, 73001677. 

Charleston County 

Savannah (nuclear ship), W of Mt. Pleasant 

on E side of Charleston Harbor, Mount 

Pleasant vicinity, 82001518. 

Edgefield County 

Big Stevens Creek Baptist Church, About 8 

mi. NW of North Augusta on SC 230, North 

Augusta vicinity, 71000774. 

Simkins, Paris, House, 202 Gary St., 

Edgefield, 84002044. 

Fairfield County 

Beard, James, House, (Fairfield County 

MRA), W of Ridgeway, Ridgeway vicinity, 

84000585. 

Furman Institution Academic Building, 

(Fairfield County MRA), SW of Winnsboro, 

Winnsboro vicinity, 84000600. 

Greenville County 

Cherrydale, 1500 Poinsett Hwy., Greenville, 

76001702. 

Greenwood County 

Mays, Benjamin, Birthplace, 0.5 mi NW of 

jct. Of U.S. 179 and Scott Ferry Rd., 

Epworth vicinity, 98000414. 

Lancaster County 

Kilburnie, 204 N. White St., Lancaster, 

79002385. 

Lexington County 

Timmerman Law Office, (Lexington County 

MRA), 207 E. Main St., Lexington vicinity, 

83003922. 

Newberry County 

Oakhurst, 2723 Main St., Newberry, 

79002389. 

Orangeburg County 

Gilmore House, S of intersection of State St. 

And Eutaw Rd., Holly Hill, 88001470. 

Richland County 

South Carolina Penitentiary, 1511 Williams 

St., Columbia, 95001489. 

Spartanburg County 

Ingleside, 1 mi. N of Campobello on U.S. 176, 

Campobello vicinity, 73001729. 

[FR Doc. 05–22943 Filed 11–18–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–51–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Reclamation 

Information Collection Activities Under 

OMB Review 

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of Data Collection 

Submission. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

3501 et seq.), this notice announces that 

the Information Collection Request (ICR) 

abstracted below has been forwarded to 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for approval. The ICR describes 

the nature of the information collection 

and its expected cost and burden. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before December 21, 2005. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments 

regarding the burden estimate, or any 

other aspect of the information 

collection, including suggestions for 

reducing the burden, to the Desk Officer 

for the Department of the Interior at the 

Office of Management and Budget, 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, via facsimile at 202–395–6566 

or via e-mail to 

oira_docket@omb.eop.gov. A copy of 

your comments should also be directed 

to the Bureau of Reclamation, Northern 

California Area Office, Attention: 

Natalie L. Wolder, PO Box 988, 

Willows, California 95988. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

further information or a copy of the 

proposed collection of information 

form, contact Natalie Wolder at 530–

934–1356. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments 

are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of 

Reclamation’s functions, including 

whether the information will have 

practical use; (b) the accuracy of 

Reclamation’s estimated time and cost 

burdens of the proposed collection of 

information, including the validity of 

the methodology and assumptions used; 

(c) ways to enhance the quality, use, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including increased use 

of automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

Title: Summary of Water 

Requirements for Crops Grown on 

Eligible Land, 43 CFR part 426. 

Abstract: Reclamation developed 

Form LS–924, Summary of Water 

Requirements for Crops Grown on 

Eligible Land, to facilitate and 

standardize the submission of data from 

the Sacramento River settlement 

contractors that divert water from 

Sacramento River sources. The 

information requested is required to 

ensure the proper implementation of 43 

CFR 426.15 and the commingling 

provisions in the Sacramento River 

settlement contracts. 

Description of respondents: There are 

approximately 44 Sacramento River 

settlement contractors (individuals/ 

districts) that are required to file Form 

LS–924 for the purpose of contract 

administration. 

Frequency: Annually. 

Estimated completion time: An 

average of 60 minutes per respondent. 

Annual responses: 44 respondents. 

Annual burden hours: 44. 

An Agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. Reclamation will 

display a valid OMB control number on 

the form. 

A Federal Register notice with a 60- 

day comment period soliciting 

comments on this collection of 

information was published on April 14, 

2005 (70 FR 19780). Reclamation did 

not receive any comments on this 

collection of information during the 

comment period. 

OMB has up to 60 days to approve or 

disapprove this information collection, 

but may respond after 30 days; 

therefore, public comment should be 

submitted to OMB within 30 days in 

order to assure maximum consideration. 

70100 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 223 / Monday, November 21, 2005 / Notices 

Our practice is to make comments, 

including names and home addresses of 

respondents, available for public 

review. Individual respondents may 

request that we withhold their home 

address from public disclosure, which 

we will honor to the extent allowable by 

law. There also may be circumstances in 

which we would withhold a 

respondent’s identity from public 

disclosure, as allowable by law. If you 

wish us to withhold your name and/or 

address, you must state this 

prominently at the beginning of your 

comment. We will make all submissions 

from organizations or businesses, and 

from individuals identifying themselves 

as representatives or officials of 

organizations or businesses, available 

for public disclosure in their entirety. 

Natalie L. Wolder, 

Acting Chief, Water and Lands Division, 

Northern California Area Office, Mid Pacific 

Region. 

[FR Doc. 05–22966 Filed 11–18–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

Program: Training and Employment 

Guidance Letter 

The Employment and Training 

Administration interprets federal law 

requirements pertaining to Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (TAA). These 

interpretations are issued in Training 

and Employment Guidance Letters 

(TEGLs) to the State Workforce 

Agencies. The TEGL described below is 

published in the Federal Register in 

order to inform the public. 

TEGL 32–04 

TEGL 32–04 provides guidance to 

states on meeting Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 

goals for the TAA and NAFTA–TAA 

programs. 

The information contained in TEGL 

32–04 is issued to States and the 

cooperating state workforce agencies 

(SWAs) as guidance provided by the 

Department of Labor (DOL) in its role as 

the principal in the TAA program. As 

agents of the Secretary of Labor, the 

states and cooperating SWAs may not 

vary from the instructions in TEGL 32–

04 without prior approval from the 

Department. 

Dated: November 14, 2005. 

Emily Stover DeRocco, 

Assistant Secretary of Labor. 

Employment and Training 

Administration Advisory System 

U.S. Department of Labor, 

Washington, DC 20210 

Classification: TAA/NAFTA–TAA 

Correspondence Symbol: ONR 

Date: May 17, 2005 

Training and Employment Guidance 

Letter No. 32–04 

To: All State Workforce Agencies; All 

State Workforce Liaisons; All State 

Trade Coordinators /s/ 

From: Emily Stover DeRocco, Assistant 

Secretary 

Subject: State Accomplishment of 

Performance Goals for Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and 

North American Free Trade 

Agreement Transitional Adjustment 

Assistance (NAFTA–TAA) 

Participants 

1. Purpose. To provide guidance on 

meeting the Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 goals 

for the TAA and NAFTA–TAA 

programs. 

2. References. Trade Act of 1974 (Pub. 

L. 93–619), as amended; Trade Act of 

2002 (Pub. L. 107–210); Workforce 

Investment Act; Government 

Performance and Results Act of 1993 

(GPRA), as amended; Training and 

Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL) 7–

99, ‘‘Core and Customer Satisfaction 

Performance Measures for the 

Workforce Investment System;’’ TEGL 

11–00, ‘‘Operating Instructions for 

Implementing the Amendments to the 

Trade Act of 1974 Enacted by the Trade 

Act of 2002;’’ TEGL 6–03, ‘‘Fiscal Year 

(FY) 2004 State Planning Estimates and 

Process for Requesting Additional Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (TAA) Funds for 

Training and Administration.’’

3. Background. The Trade Act 

programs, TAA and NAFTA–TAA, were 

established to provide workers 

adversely affected by trade with 

assistance to return them to sustainable 

employment as quickly as possible. 

While many trade-affected workers will 

be able to find reemployment without 

assistance, the Trade Act programs 

provide an array of benefits for those 

who need additional help. 

Performance measures were 

established for the Trade Act programs 

to measure the programs’ success in 

returning individuals to sustainable 

employment. National goals are set each 

year for the reemployment rate, 

retention rate, and wage replacement 

rate to be achieved by participants 

exiting the TAA and NAFTA–TAA 

programs. Although there are no 

individual state goals, states are 

responsible for meeting the national 

goals for the Trade Act programs as 

required by the Agreement between the 

Governor of each state and the Secretary 

of Labor. 

Performance in FY 2004 indicates 

considerable improvement in outcomes 

must be realized if the national goals are 

to be achieved in FY 2005. To the extent 

that these shortfalls are related to 

reporting deficiencies, the suggestions 

provided in section 6 of this TEGL 

emphasize the need for fully accounting 

for all TAA and NAFTA–TAA 

participants who enter employment in 

FY 2005. Moreover, since performance 

is an ongoing emphasis, the 

performance principles included in 

section 6 will be extremely helpful to 

states in ensuring that program 

performance is at acceptable levels in 

future years. 

This TEGL provides guidance to states 

on FY 2005 goals as well as actions 

needed to achieve those goals. 

4. Performance Goals. 

The Trade Act programs’ national 

performance goals for FY 2005 are: 

• 70 percent of program exiters will 

be employed in the first quarter after 

program exit; 

• 89 percent of those who were 

employed in the first quarter after 

program exit will be employed in the 

third quarter after program exit; and 

• Those who are employed in the 

second and third quarters after program 

exit will earn, on average, not less than 

80 percent of their pre-separation 

earnings. 

5. Reported Past Performance. As 

outlined in TEGL 11–00, states are 

required to submit a quarterly Trade Act 

Participant Report (TAPR), Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

approval number 1205–0392. Based on 

the outcomes reported in the TAPR, the 

TAA program has not met national 

performance goals in the past several 

years. In the most recent complete fiscal 

year, FY 2004, the reported outcomes 

fell short of the national goals on two of 

the three measures.