Jerry V. Leaphart #JL4468

Jerry V. Leaphart & Assoc., P.C.

8 West Street, Suite 203

Danbury, CT 06810

(203) 825-6265 – phone

(203) 825-6256 – fax

jsleaphart@cs.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------x

DR. JUDY WOOD on behalf of the :

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : EFC Case

:

Plaintiff/Relator, :

:

vs. :

:

APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. et al : DOCKET NO.

: 07 CV 3314 (GBD)

Defendants. :

----------------------------------------x

AFFIDAVIT

 United Kingdom)

 ss:

County of --- Derbyshire )

ANDREW JOHNSON, being duly sworn, deposes and says:

1. I am of full age and legal capacity and make this affidavit in support of Dr.

Judy Wood’s contentions that the effects of the use of directed energy weaponry are still

ongoing at the site of the World Trade Center in New York, NY, also known as Ground

Zero (GZ). I understand this affidavit is to be used in the above captioned case. All

representations herein are true to the best of my knowledge, are based on personal

observation, including the taking of a videographic record, made by me, from which still

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 60 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 1 of 6
2

photographs were extracted. As to all such data and information, they are accurate

representations of the conditions therein shown, based upon my personal observation.

2. I hereby reaffirm my review of and agreement with the state of facts and of

affairs articulated in plaintiff’s amended complaint, which I have read.

3. I assert that I am a Bachelor of Science Graduate in Computer Science and

Physics, and have worked in a Software Engineering Discipline for the greater part of 20

years.

4. I assert that at a basic level, the stated combination of jet fuel and/or gravity

does not pulverize buildings and that a person competent in physics must know that to be

the case.

5. I assert that the evidence collected by Dr. Judy Wood shows the effects of a

Directed Energy Weapon rather than the effects of hydrocarbon fires, let alone fires

generated by a mere combustible (non-flammable) middle distillate like jet fuel.

6. I assert that I completed a study of New York City “First Responder

Accounts” and I found accounts which indicate the use of directed energy weapons in the

destruction of the World Trade Centre.

7. I assert that, because of assertions 4 and 5, the government and its contractors

intentionally participated in a blatantly false and misleading project that was to have

determined why and how the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center was destroyed in

which project, the defendants herein each had contracts that required them to provide

various professional services in furtherance of determining what caused the destruction of

the WTC. The importance of that work and the importance of doing it, absent fraud

cannot be overstated. As a result of the fraud committed by the defendants herein, the

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 60 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 2 of 6
3

fact that the WTC was destroyed by use of exotic weapons systems, known generically as

“DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS” (DEW) has been withheld and hidden, such that, to

this day, meaning the day and time this affidavit is submitted and filed, there exists, at the

site of the WTC, in New York, NY, a clear and present danger to the public in that the

after-effects of the use of DEW has not been rectified and is still ongoing.

8. The type of DEW used to destroy the WTC had certain characteristics and

properties that mandate a certain kind of cleanup process. In the case of the DEW used to

destroy the WTC, the cleanup necessitates the use of enormous quantities of dirt over an

extended period of time, measured in years, rather than days, weeks or months.

9. I visited the site of the WTC on 17th January 2008 and photographed and

videoed hosing-down operations on the site of the WTC and videoed trucks removing dirt

from the site.

10. I photographed painted beams in the PATH train station where rust had come

through the paint, which in such an environment, should not be rusting to the degree that

they are.

11. I videoed possible fuming effects caused during ongoing site work on 17th Jan

2008.

12. In recognition of the fact that the after effects of the use of DEW are ongoing

and have not been controlled or contained, let alone fully remediated, I have caused a

copy of this affidavit to be served on the US Attorney who had been handling this case as

and for notification that a clear and present danger continues to exist at the WTC site as a

result of and by virtue of the non-disclosure and the continuing fraud of not

acknowledging that the WTC was destroyed by DEW.

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 60 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 3 of 6
4

13. I assert that photos from the deconstruction of the Deutsche Bank (or Banker’s

Trust) building show anomalous levels of rusting and that I witnessed the ongoing

dismantling of the building in NYC.

14. I assert that the contamination of the WTC site and effects seen nearby pose a

clear and present danger to the public.

15. I assert that in November 2005, SAIC was hired by NY Gov Pataki to help

manage the security of the WTC site.

16. I assert that only a portion of the WTC site has been turned over to developer

Silverstein Properties.

NYC First Responder Witness Account Portions in Support of this Affidavit

On page 13 of his account, Paramedic Robert Ruiz (File No. 9110333) describes a

spontaneous car fire:

Like things weren't bad enough already, the car that's parked right on that corner catches

on fire. I don't mean a little fire, the entire thing. Don't ask me how. The entire car caught

on fire. You would think maybe just a motor part or just the engine part. But this entire

car just goes up in fire.

Also, Account of Paul Curran, Fire Patrolmen - File No 9110369

At that time I went back to the north tower again, and they were stretching a line. A lot of

car fires erupted. All of a sudden cars were blowing up everywhere. ... it was bad from

the beginning, and it went totally haywire when the other tower collapsed. It was just

nothing but carnage and debris. It was just bodies, body parts everywhere, a shoe with a

leg in it. It was just horrible, you know.

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 60 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 4 of 6
5

Photographs in Support of this Affidavit

Figure 1 – Rusting/Corroded Beam on Path Train Station Stairway

17th Jan 2008, Canon A540 Digital Camera

Figure 2 – Fuming effects seen at NYC WTC Site 17th Jan 2008. Still

image from Samsung MX10 Video Camera

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 60 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 5 of 6
6

Figure 3 – Hosing down of a suspended cable at NYC WTC Site, 17th Jan

2008. Still image from Samsung MX10 Video Camera.

/s/ Andrew Johnson

 Andrew Johnson

ad.johnson@ntlworld.com

+441332 674271

Subscribed and Sworn to before

me this 29th Day of February 2008

___________________________________

Jerry V. Leaphart #JL4468

Jerry V. Leaphart & Assoc., P.C.

8 West Street, Suite 203

Danbury, CT 06810

(203) 825-6265 – phone

(203) 825-6256 – fax

jsleaphart@cs.com

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 60 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 6 of 6