alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21

         Set forth below is a list of MEDIQ's subsidiaries, as of December 13,
1995, with their respective states of incorporation, names under which they do
business and the percentage of their voting securities owned by the Company as
of such date.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          State of                Percentage
         Name                                                          Incorporation             of Ownership
         ----                                                          -------------             ------------
<S>                                                                      <C>                         <C> 

Alpha Health Consultants, Inc.(1)                                           DE                   100
ATS Medical Services, Inc.(2)                                               PA                   100
Health Examinetics, Inc.                                                    DE                   100
Healthquest, Inc.(3)                                                        DE                    67
Jersey Kidney Specialists, Inc.(4)                                          NJ                   100
MCHC, Inc.                                                                  DE                   100
MDTC Haddon, Inc.(5)                                                        DE                   100
MEDIQ Diagnostic Centers Inc.                                               DE                   100
MEDIQ Diagnostic Centers-I Inc.(5)                                          DE                   100
MEDIQ Healthcare, Inc.                                                      DE                   100
MEDIQ Investment Services, Inc.                                             DE                   100
MEDIQ Management Services, Inc.                                             DE                   100
MEDIQ Marin, Inc.                                                           DE                   100
MEDIQ Mobile X-Ray Services, Inc.                                           DE                   100
MEDIQ/PRN Life Support Services, Inc.(6)                                    DE                   100
MEDIQ/PRN Life Support Services - I, Inc.(6)                                DE                   100
MEDIQ Services, Inc.                                                        DE                   100
P. I. Corporation (3)                                                       DE                   100
PRN Holdings, Inc.                                                          DE                   100
Thera-Kinetics Acquisition Corporation                                      NJ                   100
MEDIQ Surgical Equipment Services, Inc.                                     DE                   100
</TABLE>


----------
(1)      Subsidiary of MEDIQ Management Services, Inc.
(2)      Subsidiary of MEDIQ Mobile X-Ray Services, Inc.
(3)      Subsidiary of MEDIQ Investment Services, Inc.
(4)      Subsidiary of MICD, Inc.
(5)      Subsidiary of MEDIQ Diagnostic Centers Inc.
(6)      Subsidiary of PRN Holdings, Inc.


<PAGE>
Case 1:07-cv-03303-CM-DCF Document 5 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15033-AKH Document 6 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-15033-AKH Document 6 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 23, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70742-70743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22836]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 05-2901, MM Docket No. 01-107, RM-10057]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Hemlock and Mount Pleasant, MI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; denial of petition for reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The staff denied a petition for reconsideration filed by 
MacDonald Broadcasting Company of a decision in this proceeding, 
reallotting and changing the community of license for Station WCEN-FM, 
Channel 233C1, from Mount Pleasant, MI, to Hemlock MI. The staff 
determined that the reconsideration petition did not demonstrate any 
errors of fact or law. Specifically, because Hemlock is not located 
inside the Saginaw, MI, Urbanized Area and because the station will not 
place a city-grade signal over 50 percent or more of that Urbanized 
Area, a Tuck showing was not required to demonstrate that Hemlock is 
sufficiently independent of the Saginaw Urbanized Area to warrant a 
first local service preference. See 66 FR 55598 (November 2, 2001).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew J. Rhodes, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order, MM Docket No. 01-107, adopted November 2, 
2005, and released November 4, 2005. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th 
Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased

[[Page 70743]]

from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 
Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20054, 
telephone 1-800-378-3160 or http://www.BCPIWEB.com. This document is 
not subject to the Congressional Review Act. (The Commission, is, 
therefore, not required to submit a copy of this Report and Order to 
GAO, pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 
801(a)(1)(A) because the petition for reconsideration was denied.)

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 05-22836 Filed 11-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<MULTIPLIER> 1

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                          747,667
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   968,540
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     1,573,614
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                18,404
<PP&E>                          2,881,828
<DEPRECIATION>                  2,692,628
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  4,021,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           495,691
<BONDS>                         0
<COMMON>                        242,756
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      3,283,361
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    4,021,808
<SALES>                         1,830,841
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,830,841
<CGS>                           1,812,250
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,812,250
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 24,635
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    24,635
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.00
        


</TABLE>
INTERGRAPH
----------

                                                  Memorandum
------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Office of the CEO


Date:          June 7, 1999

To:            Manfred Wittler

From:          Jim Meadlock

Subject:       Employee Agreement/Addendum to U.S. Contract

------------------------------------------------------------

Manfred,

The following summarizes our agreement:

1.   Your annual salary base will be increased by $10,000
     per month effective May 31, 1999.

2.   Intergraph will pay reasonable relocation costs for
     essential household goods to be shipped from Germany.

3.   Your housing allowance will be discontinued in the
     Netherlands and will be replaced by the same amount
     (after conversion to U.S. dollars).

4.   At termination of employment with Intergraph,
     Intergraph will ensure that you did not lose money on
     the buying and reselling of the residence that you
     currently have under contract.

5.   You will be provided a company car.

6.   Your overseas travel will be business class.

7.   In the event that your employment is terminated by
     Intergraph prior to your retirement, you will receive
     one (1) year severance.

Additionally, I will recommend to the Intergraph Board that
you receive a seat on the Intergraph Board.

Apart from the above, all other employment conditions remain
in effect.


/s/  Jim Meadlock                   /s/  Manfred Wittler
-----------------                   --------------------
Jim Meadlock                        Manfred Wittler


------------------------------------------------------------
#### YOUNG v. MARSHBURN

No. 52 PC.

Case below: 10 N.C. App. 729.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 10 June 1971.
---

CONSENT OF EXPERT

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the
40-F) of Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended
August 31, 2015 to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the Annual Information Form (the AIF) and Managements Discussion
and Analysis(MD&A) of the Company for the year then ended, which
are incorporated by reference therein.

The undersigned hereby consents to the references to, and the
information derived from, the reports titled Technical Report on Project 3
Resource Cut Estimation of the Western Bushveld Joint Venture (WBJV) Located on
the Western Limb of the Bushveld Igneous Complex, South Africa, dated August
31, 2010, An Independent Technical Report on the Maseve Project (WBJV Project
areas 1 and 1A) located on the Western Limb of the Bushveld Igneous Complex,
South Africa, dated effective July 15, 2015, and An Independent Technical
Report on the Waterberg Project located in the Bushveld Igneous Complex, South
Africa, dated effective July 20, 2015, and to the references to the
undersigneds name included in or incorporated by reference in the 40-F, the AIF
and the MD&A.

|/s/ Charles J.
      Muller | 
|--------------------------- | 
|Charles J. Muller           | 
|Date: November 24, 2015     | 

---
Case 1:06-cv-15101-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### WILLIS v. WILLIS

No. 94 PC.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 732.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 May 1980.
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

ARCTIC CAT INC. 2007 OMNIBUS STOCK AND INCENTIVE PLAN


August 7, 2009


 


RECITALS:


 


A.                                    The Arctic Cat
Inc. 2007 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted by the
Board of Directors of Arctic Cat Inc. (the “Company”) on June 20, 2007,
and was approved by the shareholders of the Company on August 8, 2007.


 


B.                                    The
shareholders of the Company amended the Plan on August 6, 2009 to increase
the number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Plan.


 


C.                                    The Board of
Directors of the Company, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee and
the Governance Committee, amended the Plan on August 6, 2009 to modify the
terms of the annual automatic option grants to non-employee directors of the
Company and adopted this First Amendment to the Arctic Cat Inc. 2007 Omnibus
Stock and Incentive Plan incorporating the amendments adopted by the
shareholders and the Board of Directors.


 


AMENDMENT:


 


THEREFORE,
the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


 


1.                                      Section 4(a) of
the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:


 


“(a)         Shares
Available.  Subject to
adjustment as provided in Section 4(c) of the Plan, the aggregate
number of Shares that may be issued under the Plan shall be 3,785,000.”


 


2.             The first paragraph of Section 6(d) of
the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:


 


“(d)         Directors Who
Are Not Employees. Each person who is not an employee of the Company
or its Subsidiaries and who is serving as a director of the Company on April 1
of each year, shall as of each April 1 automatically be granted an Option
to purchase 11,000 shares of the Company’s Stock at an exercise price per share
equal to 100% of the Fair Market Value of a share of the Company’s Stock on the
date of the grant of the Option; provided that any such Director may decline
receipt of said Option; provided, further, that any person who is not an
employee of the Company or its Subsidiaries and who is appointed as a director
of the Company by action of the Board after April 2 may, at the discretion
of the Board, be granted an Option with such terms as the Board determines at
the time of such appointment.  All such
Options shall be designated as Non-Qualified Stock Options, shall include a
three (3) year vesting requirement, and shall expire ten (10) years from
the date of grant.”


 


3.                                      This First
Amendment to the Arctic Cat 2007 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan shall be
effective as of August 7, 2009.
Case 1:06-cv-15099-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-14458-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 17 Filed 06/26/2008 Page 1 of 11Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 17 Filed 06/26/2008 Page 2 of 11Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 17 Filed 06/26/2008 Page 3 of 11Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 17 Filed 06/26/2008 Page 4 of 11Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 17 Filed 06/26/2008 Page 5 of 11Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 17 Filed 06/26/2008 Page 6 of 11Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 17 Filed 06/26/2008 Page 7 of 11Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 17 Filed 06/26/2008 Page 8 of 11Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 17 Filed 06/26/2008 Page 9 of 11Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 17 Filed 06/26/2008 Page 10 of 11Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 17 Filed 06/26/2008 Page 11 of 11
Case 1:06-cv-15063-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STAT ES DIS TRICT COURT F OR THE D ISTRIC T OF CO LU M BIA MOAMM AR BADAWI DOK HAN, P etitioner , v. Ci vilAc ti on N o. 08 -0 98 7 ( JD B) BARACK

OBAMA, et

al., Re spo nde nt s. OR DE R Respondents in this case a re r equire d to produce upon reque st a dec lassified fa ctual re tur n. Se e Ca se Mana g e me nt O rd e r ( Ma rc h 3 , 2 00 9) at § I .A(d

kt. e nt. #8 7) . A c c or din gto re sp on de nts , th e de c la ssi fi e d r e tur n ma y be sh are d o nly

wi th t he pe tit ion e r h ims e lf

in l ig ht o f i ts "pr otected" status. At present, then, pe titioner' s counsel may not share the decla ssified retur n wi th o the r i nd ivi du a ls - - f or e xamp le , e xpe rt s o r o the r w itn e sse s - - who may ne e d to re vie w i t in pre- hear ing pr epar ations. Respondents appea r to have rec og nized the difficulty with this posi tion an d th e y h av e r e p r e s e n t e d

th atth e y ar e r e e v a l u at i n gi t . A c c o r d i n g l y, i ti s h e r e b y OR DE RE D that responde nts shall provide a status re port, in writing a nd by not later than Ma

rch 11, 2009, updatingthe Court with reg ard to their position on this matter. SO OR DE RE D . / s / J OHN D. B ATES Un i t edS t at es Di s tri ctJ u d ge Date: Ma

rch 4, 2009
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.0



                        INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS CORPORATION

       LIST OF PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES AND OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS
                              AS OF MARCH 18, 1997



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

      SUBSIDIARY NAME                                      STATE OF ORGANIZATION
---------------------------------------------------------  ---------------------
<S>                                                             <C>
ChemFree Corporation                                            Georgia
Intelligent Enclosures Corporation                              Georgia
INP L.P.                                                        Delaware
InterQuad Services Limited                                      United Kingdom
INTS Holdings, Inc.                                             Delaware
Public Health Software Systems, LLC                             Georgia
PsyCare America, LLC dba Rapha or Rapha Treatment Centers       Georgia
PsyCare L.P.                                                    Delaware
PsyCare U.S.A., LLC                                             Georgia
Quadram Corporation                                             Georgia
</TABLE>
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 34-3 Filed 05/02/2005 Page 1 of 5
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 34-3 Filed 05/02/2005 Page 2 of 5
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 34-3 Filed 05/02/2005 Page 3 of 5
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 34-3 Filed 05/02/2005 Page 4 of 5
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 34-3 Filed 05/02/2005 Page 5 of 5
#### ARCHAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-1130, 05-1131, 05-1132.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 31, 2005.

Before MAYER, RADER, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

Kevin P. Miller submits a “Request for Leave to Proceed on Original Record” and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, purportedly on behalf of Archay Financial Corporation. We consider whether Archay’s appeals from the decisions of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in *Archay Financial Corp. v. General Motors Corp.,*No.2:04-X-70092, should be dismissed as untimely.

Miller filed three notices of appeal, purportedly on behalf of Archay, on Novem*1004ber 22, 2004. The notice of appeal in 05-1130 reflects that Archay seeks to appeal a September 3, 2004 order, and the notices of appeal in 05-1131 and 05-1132 state that Archay seeks to appeal from actions purportedly taken by the district court on October 5 and October 8, 2004, respectively.*

An appeal from a decision of a district court must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order appealed from. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). Because the notices of appeal were filed on November 22, 2004, more than 30 days after the decisions Archay seeks to appeal, they are untimely and must be dismissed.

Furthermore, we note that counsel for Archay has not filed an entry of appearance. A corporation may not appear in this court without counsel. *See*U.S.C. § 1654; Fed. Cir. R. 47.3; *Rowland v. California Men’s Colony,*506 U.S. 194, 201-201, 113 S.Ct. 716, 121 L.Ed.2d 656 (1993) (“It has been the law for the better part of two centuries ... that a corporation may appear in the federal courts only through licensed counsel.”); *Richdel, Inc. v. Sunspool Corp.,*699 F.2d 1366 (Fed.Cir. 1983) (“only a lawyer, and not a corporate officer or stockholder, may appear for the corporation in litigation before the court”).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The appeals are dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

(3) The revised official caption is reflected above.

(4) All pending motions are moot.

*

 We note that the district court’s docket sheet does not reflect that any orders or judgments were issued on October 5 or October 8.
Case 1:06-cv-15113-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

STEPHEN H. STETLER,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 276 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of October, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
DOCSNY-267214v01 

Robert J. Higgins, Esq. (RH-6477) 

Judith R. Cohen, Esq. (JC-8614) 

Kenneth H. Frenchman, Esq. (KF-3635) 

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036-2714 

(212) 277-6500 

Attorneys for Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER LOWER 

MANHATTAN DISASTER SITE LITIGATION 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

21 MC 102 (AKH) 

 : 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

VIVIANA VERGARA (AND HUSBAND, 

VERTER VERGARA), 

 Plaintiffs, 

 - against - 

ALAN KASMAN DBA KASCO, et al., 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

06-CV-15116-AKH 

NOTICE OF ADOPTION 

OF ANSWER 

TO MASTER COMPLAINT 

BY MERRILL LYNCH 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED 

----------------------------------------------------------------X 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (“Merrill 

Lynch”), as and for its responses to the allegations set forth in the Complaint by Adoption 

(Check-Off Complaint) Related to the Master Complaint filed in the above-referenced action, 

hereby adopts Merrill Lynch’s Answer to Master Complaint, dated August 3, 2007, which was 

filed in the matter of In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 21 

MC 102 (AKH). 

Case 1:06-cv-15116-AKH Document 9 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
2 

DOCSNY-267214v01 

WHEREFORE, Merrill Lynch demands judgment dismissing the above-captioned 

action as against it, together with its costs and disbursements and for such other and further relief 

as this Court deems just and proper. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 September 14, 2007 

 By:

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

/s/ Judith R. Cohen______________________ 

Robert J. Higgins (RH-6477) 

Judith R. Cohen (JC-8614) 

Kenneth H. Frenchman (KF-3635) 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Phone: (212) 277-6500 

Fax: (212) 277-6501 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. 

Case 1:06-cv-15116-AKH Document 9 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 2 of 2