alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch

,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 5 , 2021 

# Order

Clerk May 5 , 2021

160813( 10 5 )

GRANT BAUSERMAN, KARL WILLIAMS

and TEDDY BROE, on Behalf of Themselves

and All Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

SC: 160813

v COA: 333181

Ct of Claims: 15

- 000202

- MM

UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE AGENCY,

Defendant

- Appellant

.

_______ ______________________________ ___ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the joint motion of the American Civil Liberties Union

of Michigan and the National Lawyers Guild to file a brief amicus curiae i s GRANTED.

The amicus brief submitted on May 4 , 2021 , is accepted for filing

.
#### SOLESBEE v. BROWN

No. 123 PC.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 476.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 June 1975.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1577 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to prohibit certain contracts between 

health insurance plans or issuers and health care providers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2019 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself and Mr. BENNET) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to prohibit certain 

contracts between health insurance plans or issuers and 

health care providers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Know the Price Act 

5 of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE ACT. 

7 Subpart II of part A of title XXVII of the Public 

8 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg–11 et seq.) is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1577 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 2729A. PROVIDER CONTRACTS. 

2 ‘‘(a) INFORMATION ON PROVIDER ALTERNATIVES.— 

3 A group health plan or a health insurance issuer offering 

4 group or individual health insurance coverage shall not 

5 enter into an agreement with a provider, network or asso6 ciation of providers, third-party administrator, or other 

7 service provider that would, directly or indirectly— 

8 ‘‘(1) restrict the group health plan or health in9 surance issuer from providing price or quality infor10 mation, through a consumer engagement tool or any 

11 other means, to providers or the sponsor, enrollees, 

12 or potential enrollees of the plan or coverage; or 

13 ‘‘(2) restrict the group health plan or health in14 surance issuer from sharing data described in para15 graph (1) with a third party, for plan management 

16 purposes.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.83 MB)

Tags:Asia Pacific, National Memorial Cemetery of the Pacific, Dec. 7, 1941, USS Oklahoma, unknown, Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency, NMCP, identify, December 7, Pacific Command, World War II, U.S. Navy, Pacific, PACOM, Hawaii, dignified transfer, DPAA, PACFLT, Pacific Fleet, Honolulu, Oahu, Veteran, Indo-Asia-Pacific region, disinterment

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL REPORTS

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

I, William S. Johnson,certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of EARLE M. JORGENSEN COMPANY (“EMJ”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of EMJ as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.             EMJ’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for EMJ and have:

 

(a)                                  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)                                 Evaluated the effectiveness of EMJ’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)                                  Disclosed in this report any changes inEMJ’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during EMJ’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, EMJ’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                 EMJ’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to EMJ’s auditors and the audit committee ofEMJ’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)                                  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect EMJ’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)                                 Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in EMJ’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: February 16, 2004

 

 
| /s/ William S. Johnson                                |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| William S. Johnson                                    |
| Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |

 

----
#### STATE v. NORTON

No. 2P83.

Case below: 60 N.C. App. 217.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 11 January 1983.
<PAGE>   1




EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                     MICROS SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                for the years ended June 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996
                     (in thousands, except per share data)

The following table has been retroactively restated to reflect a two-for-one
stock split, effected in the form of a stock dividend, paid June 23, 1998:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 1998       1997        1996
                                                              ----------  ---------  ---------
         <S>                                                     <C>       <C>          <C>
         Weighted-average number of common shares                 16,027     15,918     15,794
         Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options                663        183        218
                                                                  ------     ------     ------
         Weighted-average number of common and common
           equivalent shares outstanding                          16,690     16,101     16,012
                                                                  ======     ======     ======
         Net income                                              $19,641    $16,332     $2,392
                                                                 =======    =======     ======
         Basic net income per common share                         $1.23      $1.03      $0.15
                                                                   =====      =====      =====
         Diluted net income per common share                       $1.18      $1.01      $0.15
                                                                   =====      =====      =====

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. LOGUE

No. 349 PC

Case below: 47 NC App 585

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 15 August 1980.
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03320-SHS Document 8 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:07-cr-00357-CM Document 51 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 1 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00357-CM Document 51 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 2 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00357-CM Document 51 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 3 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00357-CM Document 51 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 4 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00357-CM Document 51 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 5 of 6Case 1:07-cr-00357-CM Document 51 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 6 of 6
#### AUMAN v. DAIRY PRODUCTS

No. 32 PC.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 599.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 April 1974.
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 1 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 2 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 3 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 4 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 5 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 6 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 7 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 8 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 9 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 10 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 11 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 12 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 13 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 14 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 15 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 16 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 17 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 18 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 19 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 20 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 21 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 22 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 23 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 24 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 25 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 26 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 27 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 28 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 29 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 30 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 31 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 32 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 33 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 34 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 35 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 36 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 37 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 38 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 39 of 40
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB Document 11-8 Filed 03/28/2008 Page 40 of 40
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 45-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 45-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 2 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 45-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 3 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 45-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 4 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 45-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 5 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 45-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 6 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 45-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 7 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 45-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 8 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 45-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 9 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 45-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 10 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 45-3 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 11 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 35 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 35 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 35 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 3 of 3
# Remains of WWII sailor, soldier identified, will receive US burials

/ Published April 2, 2024
Washington, 
The remains of two World War II veterans who went missing in action were recently accounted for by the Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency, and will have U.S. burials later this year.

U.S. Navy Mess Attendant 3rd Class David Walker, 19, of Norfolk, Va., was accounted for Nov. 27, 2023, and U.S. Army Cpl. Frank V. Benak, 24, of Scottsville, Mich., was accounted for Feb. 2, the DPAA announced Thursday.Read the full story here: https://www.stripes.com/history/2024-04-01/wwii-remains-accounted-for-13466977.html
#### STATE v. BLIZZARD

No. 40 PC.

Case below: 7 N.C. App. 395.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 14 April 1970.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1903

DAVID M. KISSI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COLDWELL BANKER; DAVID MUCHOW,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 08-1904

DAVID M. KISSI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DK&R CHAPTER 7 ESTATE, AMMENDABLE TRUST; RICHARD M. KREMEN; 

DLA PIPER OF BALTIMORE, MD; RICHARD E. GREENBERG,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District 

of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District 

Judge. (8:08-cv-01593-PJM; 8:08-cv-01663-PJM)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 2, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD Circuit Judges.
2

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David M. Kissi, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Anne Manuelides, 

SAUL EWING, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; James Patrick Ulwick, 

KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, David Kissi appeals 

from two orders entered by the district court for Northern 

District of Ohio transferring his cases to the district court 

for the District of Maryland. Because appeals from those orders 

must be filed in the Sixth Circuit, which has already issued an 

opinion dismissing one of these appeals, we dismiss the appeals 

for lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1294 (2006). 

Further, we decline to transfer the appeals to the 

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit as we do not find that 

such a transfer is in the interest of justice. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1631 (2006). Accordingly, we deny Kissi’s motion for 

appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeals. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 1:06-cv-15042-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1434 

To prohibit the use of reverse auctions for design and construction services 

procurements, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 13, 2019 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself and Ms. HIRONO) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of reverse auctions for design and 

construction services procurements, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Construction Con5 sensus Procurement Improvement Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1434 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF A REVERSE AUCTION FOR 

2 THE AWARD OF A CONTRACT FOR DESIGN 

3 AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES. 

4 (a) FINDING.—Congress finds that, in contrast to a 

5 traditional auction in which the buyers bid up the price, 

6 sellers bid down the price in a reverse auction. 

7 (b) PROHIBITION.—Not later than 180 days after the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition 

9 Regulation shall be amended to prohibit the use of reverse 

10 auctions for awarding contracts for design and construc11 tion services. 

12 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

13 (1) The term ‘‘design and construction serv14 ices’’ means— 

15 (A) site planning and landscape design; 

16 (B) architectural and engineering services 

17 (as defined in section 1102 of title 40, United 

18 States Code); 

19 (C) interior design; 

20 (D) performance of substantial construc21 tion work for facility, infrastructure, and envi22 ronmental restoration projects; 

23 (E) delivery and supply of construction 

24 materials to construction sites; or 

25 (F) construction or substantial alteration 

26 of public buildings or public works. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 1434 IS

1 (2) The term ‘‘reverse auction’’ means, with re2 spect to any procurement by an executive agency— 

3 (A) a real-time auction conducted through 

4 an electronic medium among 2 or more offerors 

5 who compete by submitting bids for a supply or 

6 service contract, or a delivery order, task order, 

7 or purchase order under the contract, with the 

8 ability to submit revised lower bids at any time 

9 before the closing of the auction; and 

10 (B) the award of the contract, delivery 

11 order, task order, or purchase order to the of12 feror, in whole or in part, based on the price 

13 obtained through the auction process. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 1 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 2 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 3 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 4 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 5 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 6 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 7 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 8 of 9

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 9 of 9