alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.3



[NSA LETTERHEAD]



CONSENT OF NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.



We hereby consent to (i) the references in this Amendment No. 1 to the Form 10-K of Plains Resources Inc., as well as in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included in such Form 10-K/A, to our reserve reports to the interest of Plains Resources Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively the Company), relating to the estimated quantities of certain of the Companys proved
reserves of oil and gas and present values thereof for certain periods (the Reserve Reports), and (ii) the incorporation by reference of the Reserve Reports into Plains Resources Inc.s previously filed Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-48610, 33-53802, 33-06191, 333-45558, 333-45562 and 333-66602).



NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.By:

/s/    C.H. (Scott) Rees IIIC.H. (Scott) Rees IIIPresident and Chief Operating Officer




Dallas, Texas

April 26, 2004
#### STATE v. MASON

No. 139 PC.

Case below: 17 N.C. App. 44.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 March 1973. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 6 March 1973.
Case 1:06-cv-14954-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 (Periodic Report) to which this statement is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                     |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Johnson Controls, Inc. |

|                                                      |
|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                      |
|                                                 |
| /s/ Stephen A. Roell                                 |
| Stephen A. RoellChairman and Chief Executive Officer |

|                                                                      |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                      |
|                                                                 |
| /s/ R. Bruce McDonald                                                |
| R. Bruce McDonaldExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer |
Case 1:06-cv-15024-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### CONWAY v. TIMBERS, INC.

No. 3 PC.

Case below: 7 N.C. App. 10.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 3 February 1970.
<PAGE>

The Board of Directors
C-COR.net Corp.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 2-95959, 33-27440, 33-35208, 33-66590, 333-02505, 333-30982, 333-43592,
333-65805 and 333-89067) on Form S-8 and (Nos. 333-82697, 333-87909, 333-90011,
333-90589 and 333-32676) on Form S-3 of C-COR.net Corp. of our reports dated
August 11, 2000, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of C-COR.net
Corp. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2000 and June 25, 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and shareholders' equity for
each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2000, and related
schedule, which reports appear in the June 30, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K
of C-COR.net Corp.


KPMG LLP

State College, Pennsylvania
September 14, 2000

                                       1
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00076-CR

MUQTASID ABDUL QADIR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 213th District Court

of Tarrant County (0591998D)

September 10, 2020

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

----------------------------------------------------------------x

Viviana Vergara and Verter Vergara

Plaintiffs,

- against -

NOMURA HOLDING AMERICA INC. and

NOMURA SECURITIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

et al. (see Defendants’ List)

Defendants.

Index No.: 06-cv-15116-AKH

(AKH)

NOTICE OF THE NOMURA

PARTIES’ ADOPTION OF

ANSWER TO MASTER

COMPLAINT

_________________________

1:21-MC-00102

----------------------------------------------------------------x

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby appears as

attorneys for Nomura Holding America INC. and Nomura Securities

International, Inc., in this action.

Dated: November 1, 2007

New York, New York

Yours, etc.

STRONGIN ROTHMAN & ABRAMS, LLP

s/ Dror M. Bikel

________________________________

Dror M. Bikel, ESQ.

Attorneys for Defendant

NOMURA HOLDING AMERICA, INC.

50 Broadway, Suite 2003

New York, NY 10004

(212) 931-8300

TO:

SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST

Case 1:06-cv-15116-AKH Document 16 Filed 11/07/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-15116-AKH Document 16 Filed 11/07/2007 Page 2 of 3
SERVICE LIST

Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern , LLP

Attorneys for the: Plaintiff(s)

Office and Post Office Address and Telephone

115 Broadway, Twelfth Floor

New York, NY 10006

(212) 267-3700

Robert A. Grochow, Esq.

ROBERT A. GROCHOW, P.C

233 Broadway, 5

th

Floor

New York, NY 10279

(212) 608-4400

rgrochow@aol.com

Gregory J. Cannata, Esq.

LAW OFFICES OF GREGORY J. CANNATA

233 Broadway, 5

th

Floor

New York, NY 10279

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs

(212) 553-9206

cannata@cannatalaw.com

Case 1:06-cv-15116-AKH Document 16 Filed 11/07/2007 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 21**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY**Following is a list of the subsidiaries of the Company:     Jurisdiction ofName of Subsidiary Incorporation   Emulex Corporate Services Corporation California   Emulex Corporation California   Emulex Design & Manufacturing Corporation Delaware   Emulex Communications Corporation California   Aarohi Communications Private Limited Karnataka, Bangalore, India   Arcxel Technologies, Inc. California   Hyland Enterprise Development, Inc. California   Emulex Caribe, Inc. (in process of liquidation) Delaware   Emulex Europe Limited (inactive) United Kingdom   InterConnections, Inc. (inactive) Washington
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

# Soldier Accounted For From Korean War (Phy, H.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### JACK C. SENGBUSCH, Appellant, v. DIANE FULLER, and HAROLD FULLER, Husband and Wife, doing business as CAVE ROCK COURT, Respondents.

No. 17924

December 22, 1987

747 P.2d 240

*David G. Pumphrey,*Minden, for Appellant.

*581
      *Manoukian, Scarpello & Ailing*and *John P. Springgate,*Zephyr Cove, for Respondents.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Appellant Jack C. Sengbusch leased a space for his mobile home at the Cave Rock Court Mobile Home Park at Lake Tahoe in Douglas County, Nevada, under a monthly tenancy agreement entered into on October 1, 1984. Cave Rock was owned and operated by respondents Diane and Harold Fuller. Following some disagreements with Sengbusch, the Fullers delivered to him a document dated June 19, 1985, and entitled “Notice to Terminate Tenancy,” demanding he leave the park by July 20, 1985. Sengbusch moved his mobile home from the park on June 29, 1985. He brought an action against the Fullers on November 1, 1985.

The case proceeded to trial solely upon the issue of whether Sengbusch should be awarded damages under NRS Chapter 118B, the Nevada statute dealing with mobile home parks. In a judgment dated December 2, 1986, the jury found that Seng-busch’s tenancy had been wrongfully terminated and awarded him $113.33 plus interest.

The jury instruction on damages quoted NRS 118B.230, which reads as follows:

> If a landlord unlawfully terminates a tenancy, the tenant may recover not more than 6 months’ periodic rent or actual damages for the injury or loss sustained by him, whichever is greater.

We reject Sengbusch’s arguments that the word “may” in this statute should be construed as mandatory and that tenants are *582entitled to an award of at least six months’ periodic rent under the statute. “May” is to be construed as permissive, unless the clear intent of the legislature is to the contrary. *See*Givens v. State, 99 Nev. 50, 54, 657 P.2d 97, 100 (1983); Thomas v. State, 88 Nev. 382, 384, 498 P.2d 1314, 1315 (1972); Ewing v. Fahey, 86 Nev. 604, 607, 472 P.2d 347, 349 (1970). “May” is defined as permissive in Nevada Supreme Court Rule 2(9) and Nevada District Court Rule 2(6). Furthermore, it is clear that NRS 118B.230 provides for a maximum but not for a minimum penalty. We see no error in the jury’s interpretation of the statute.

Sengbusch also argues that the jury award is too small in view of his moving expenses and other costs. This court will not reverse a trial court’s determination of fact unless it is clearly erroneous or not based on substantial evidence. Kockos v. Bank of Nevada, 90 Nev. 140, 143, 520 P.2d 1359, 1360-61 (1974). Since the trial transcript is not in the record, we must assume the evidence supports the lower court’s findings. *Id.*at 1361. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is affirmed.
#### PENNY v. R. R. CO.

No. 48 PC.

Case below: 10 N.C. App. 659.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 10 June 1971.
Case 1:07-cv-03228-VM-GWG Document 6 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03228-VM-GWG Document 6 Filed 01/03/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### BALLINGER v. SECRETARY OF REVENUE

No. 701P82.

Case below: 59 N.C. App. 508.

Petition by plaintiff for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 28 January 1983.
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 3 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 3 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-15034-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15034-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15034-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15034-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15034-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15034-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15034-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15034-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15034-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15034-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15034-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15034-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15034-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

SONIA BAUTISTA,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 

 State.

 

§

§

§

 

§

§

§ 

 

§

'

'

No. 08-15-00362-CR

Appeal from the

120th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20130D03636)

 O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s fifth motion for extension of time to file the brief until 

August 15, 2016. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE 

APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Ruben P. Morales, the Appellant’s Attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 15, 2016.

If the Appellant’s brief is not filed with this Court by August 15, 2016, this Court will find 

it necessary to send this case back to the trial court for a hearing as to why the Appellant’s brief has 

not been filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 9

th day of August, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
#### STATE v. DAVIS

No. 153 PC.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 191.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 February 1974:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 20, 2014

NO. 03-13-00646-CV

C. L. J. and T. P., Appellants

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, ROSE AND GOODWIN

REVERSED AND RENDERED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the decree signed by the trial court on September 11, 2013. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in 

the court’s decree. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s decree and renders judgment 

that the evidence is insufficient to support the termination of appellants’ parental rights.

Appellee shall pay all costs of the appeal both in this Court and the court below.
<PAGE>
 
                                 Exhibit 10.9B


Schedule Identifying Material Differences Among Severance Protection Agreements
               Between Barrett Resources Corporation And Each Of
         Paul R. Rady, A. Ralph Reed, J. Frank Keller, And Peter A. Dea


                                   Continued Benefits
Name             Position           Period             Lump Sum Cash Payment
----             --------          ------------------  ---------------------   
                                                    

Paul M. Rady     President,        Three years         Three times              
                 Chief Executive                       annual                   
                 Officer, and                          compensation             
                 Director                                                      

A. Ralph Reed    Executive Vice    Three years         Three times              
                 President -                           annual                   
                 Operations, and                       compensation             
                 Director                                                      

J. Frank Keller  Executive Vice    Three years         Three times              
                 President,                            annual                   
                 Chief Financial                       compensation             
                 Officer, and                                                  
                 Director                                                      

Peter A. Dea     Senior Vice       Two years           Two times annual         
                 President -                           compensation             
                 Onshore                     
                 Exploration
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1542 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1542

   To amend title 37, United States Code, to standardize payment of 
 hazardous duty incentive pay for members performing parachute jumping 
     as an essential part of military duty, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 20, 2019

  Mr. Manchin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 37, United States Code, to standardize payment of 
 hazardous duty incentive pay for members performing parachute jumping 
     as an essential part of military duty, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STANDARDIZATION OF PAYMENT OF HAZARDOUS DUTY INCENTIVE PAY 
              FOR MEMBERS PERFORMING PARACHUTE JUMPING AS AN ESSENTIAL 
              PART OF MILITARY DUTY.

    (a) Payment to Reserve Component Members as if Duty Were Performed 
on Active Duty by Members Entitled to Basic Pay.--Section 301 of title 
37, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (f)(1), by inserting ``or to a member 
        covered by subsection (g)'' before the period in the last 
        sentence; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(g) A member of a reserve component of a uniformed service, or 
the National Guard, entitled to compensation under section 206 of this 
title who performs, under orders, duty described in subsection (a)(3) 
in a month is entitled to an increase in compensation for that month 
equal to the amount provided for in the second sentence of subsection 
(c)(1) as if such duty had been performed by the member while entitled 
to basic pay.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on October 1, 2019, and shall apply with respect to duty 
performed in any month beginning on or after that date.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PIONEER OIL
AND GAS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000351349
<NAME>                                         PIONEER OIL AND GAS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         246,681
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               474,219
<PP&E>                                       1,872,324
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,254,969
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,093,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          147,315
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,134
<OTHER-SE>                                     937,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,093,359
<SALES>                                      1,076,107
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,206,309
<CGS>                                          574,863
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,214,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (17,599)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,739
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,050
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,050
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,050
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00



</TABLE>
Case 7:07-cv-03249-CLB Document 1-5 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 1 of 1