alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 22

- 1301

_____________________________
T ERRY W ILLIAMS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County

. Robert R. Wheeler , Judge

. May 6, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
B ILBREY , N ORDBY , and T ANENBAUM , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Kathleen Pafford
, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Robert “ Charl ie” Lee
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 163-6 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 1 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 163-6 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 2 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 163-6 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 3 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 163-6 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 4 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 163-6 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 5 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 163-6 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 6 of 6
Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors
C-COR Electronics, Inc. and Subsidiaries:

The audits referred to in our report dated August 12, 1998, included the related
financial  statement  schedule as of June 26, 1998, and for each of the years in
the three-year period ended June 26, 1998, included in the annual report on Form
10-K. This financial  statement  schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management.  Our  responsibility  is to express  an  opinion  on this  financial
statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement
schedule,  when  considered  in  relation  to the basic  consolidated  financial
statements  taken as a whole,  presents  fairly  in all  material  respects  the
information set forth therein.

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  registration  statements
(Nos. 2-95959, 33-27440,  33-35208, 33-66590 and 333-02505) on Form S-8 of C-COR
Electronics,  Inc. and  Subsidiaries of our report,  related to the consolidated
balance sheets of C-COR  Electronics,  Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 26, 1998
and June 27, 1997, and the related consolidated  statements of operations,  cash
flows and shareholders' equity and related financial statement schedule for each
of the years in the  three-year  period  ended June 26,  1998,  which  report is
incorporated  by  reference  in the June 26, 1998 annual  report on Form 10-K of
C-COR Electronics, Inc. and Subsidiaries.

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
State College, Pennsylvania
September 24, 1998
The Officer Road Code Toolkit is designed to promote safe driving 

practices within an agency so that patrol officers operate by a unified 

code behind the wheel: Drive to Arrive Alive.

Manager Sheet for agency leadership (e.g., chiefs, command 

staff, supervisors) to use as a guide to incorporate the safety 1 messages and decal into the workplace.

Safety Messages that managers can adapt to their 2 agency’s needs and share with patrol officers.

Drive to Arrive Alive Decal that managers can give to 3 patrol officers as a visual reminder of the messages.

officer road code toolkit

Mention of any company or product does not constitute 

endorsement by the National Institute for Occupational Safety 

and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2019–100 

https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB2019100 • October 2018

Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health
EXHIBIT 32.1

                              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Science Dynamics Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Alan C. Bashforth, Chief Executive Officer, President and Acting Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.




Dated: April 8, 2004



                                         /s/ Alan C. Bashforth
                                         ----------------------------------
                                         Name: Alan C. Bashforth
                                         Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Acting Chief Financial Officer
Document

Exhibit 10.2

ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT FOR EMPLOYEES
2021 EQUITY AND INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of ABM Industries Incorporated has approved a grant to you (the “Grantee”) of Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) pursuant to the ABM Industries Incorporated 2021 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), as described below.
Grantee Name:        [ ]
Number of RSUs Granted:    XXX
Grant Date:            [ ]
Vesting Schedule:        [ ]
Provided you continue to provide services to the Company or any subsidiary or parent of the Company through the applicable vesting date, the RSUs will vest and restrictions will lapse as provided above.  Unvested RSUs may vest or be subject to forfeiture if you terminate employment before the vesting date, as set forth in the Plan and the Statement of Terms and Conditions attached hereto.  [Notwithstanding the preceding sentence and any provisions in the Statement of Terms and Conditions related to vesting upon termination for Retirement, Disability or death:
(A)    In the event of your voluntary Retirement from the Company at least one year following the Grant Date, after reaching the age of 60, and subject to your continued compliance with any applicable restrictive covenants, your unvested RSUs will continue  to vest in accordance with the Vesting Schedule above] [if applicable][; and
(B)    In the event of your termination due to death or Disability (as defined in your Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement), and in the case of Disability, subject to the execution of a release agreement in favor of the Company and your continued compliance with any applicable restrictive covenants, your unvested RSUs will immediately vest in full.] [insert for applicable Executive Officer Award Agreements]
By accepting this Award, the Grantee agrees that the RSUs are granted under and governed by this Restricted Stock Unit Agreement and by the provisions of the Plan and the Statement of Terms and Conditions attached hereto.  The Plan and the Statement of Terms and Conditions are incorporated herein by reference.  Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan or in the Statement of Terms and Conditions, as applicable.
The Grantee acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan, the Statement of Terms and Conditions and the Plan Prospectus, represents that the Grantee has carefully read and is familiar with their provisions, and hereby accepts the RSUs subject to all of their terms and conditions.  The Grantee acknowledges that there may be adverse tax consequences upon settlement of the RSUs or disposition of the shares, if any, received in connection therewith and that Grantee should consult a tax adviser prior to such settlement or disposition.
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Soldier Accounted For From World War II (Gunnoe, J.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### TAYLOR v. UNIVERSITY

No. 50 PC.

Case below: 16 N.C. App. 117.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 November 1972.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1486 

To amend title 11, United States Code, to include certain pensions as 

administrative expenses in bankruptcy, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2019 

Mr. MANCHIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend title 11, United States Code, to include certain 

pensions as administrative expenses in bankruptcy, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prioritizing Our Work5 ers Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ALLOWANCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 503(b) of title 11, United 

8 States Code, is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (8)(B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

10 the end; 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1486 IS

1 (2) in paragraph (9), by striking the period at 

2 the end and inserting a semicolon; and 

3 (3) by inserting after paragraph (9) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(10) notwithstanding section 507(a)(5), all un6 funded vested benefits in a defined benefit pension 

7 plan; and 

8 ‘‘(11) withdrawal liability determined under 

9 part 1 of subtitle E of title IV of the Employee Re10 tirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 

11 1381 et seq.).’’. 

12 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 507(a)(5) 

13 is amended by inserting ‘‘except as provided in section 

14 503(b)(10),’’ after ‘‘Fifth,’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 564 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the financing of 

the Superfund. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2009 

Mr. BLUMENAUER (for himself and Mr. PALLONE) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the financing of the Superfund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Superfund Reinvest5 ment Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SUPERFUND TAXES. 

7 (a) EXCISE TAXES.—Section 4611(e) of the Internal 

8 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(e) APPLICATION OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE

10 SUPERFUND FINANCING RATE.—The Hazardous SubVerDate Nov 24 2008 22:52 Jan 20, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H564.IH H564

jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 564 IH

1 stance Superfund financing rate under this section shall 

2 apply after December 31, 1986, and before January 1, 

3 1996, and after the date of the enactment of this sub4 section and before January 1, 2018.’’. 

5 (b) CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL INCOME TAX.— 

6 Section 59A(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

7 amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(e) APPLICATION OF TAX.—The tax imposed by this 

9 section shall apply to taxable years beginning after De10 cember 31, 1986, and before January 1, 1996, and to tax11 able years beginning after the date of the enactment of 

12 this subsection and before January 1, 2018.’’. 

13 (c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

14 (1) Section 4611(b) of the Internal Revenue 

15 Code of 1986 is amended— 

16 (A) by striking ‘‘or exported from’’ in 

17 paragraph (1)(A), 

18 (B) by striking ‘‘or exportation’’ in para19 graph (1)(B), and 

20 (C) by striking ‘‘AND EXPORTATION’’ in 

21 the heading. 

22 (2) Section 4611(d)(3) of such Code is amend23 ed— 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•HR 564 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘or exporting the crude oil, 

2 as the case may be’’ in the text and inserting 

3 ‘‘the crude oil’’, and 

4 (B) by striking ‘‘OR EXPORTS’’ in the 

5 heading. 

6 (d) EFFECTIVE DATES.— 

7 (1) EXCISE TAXES.—The amendments made by 

8 subsections (a) and (c) shall take effect on the date 

9 of the enactment of this Act. 

10 (2) INCOME TAX.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (b) shall apply to taxable years beginning 

12 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
#### LONNIE R. SPIVEY v. THE BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY.

(Filed 27 September, 1967.)

Appeal by defendant from *Parker, J.,*February 1967 Civil Session of New HaNOVer.

This civil action to recover personal injuries was before us at the Spring Term 1965, at which time we reversed the judgment of non-suit entered at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. See *Spivey v. Wilcox Company,*264 N.C. 387, 141 S.E. 2d 808, where the facts are stated.

Upon the retrial, issues of negligence, contributory negligence, and damages were submitted to the jury and answered in favor of plaintiff. From judgment entered upon the verdict, defendant appeals.

*Aaron Goldberg and James L. Nelson for plaintiff appellee.*

*Marshall & Williams for defendant appellant.*

*468Per Curiam.

We have examined the records and find that the evidence in the second trial was not essentially different from that in the first. The assignments of error disclose no flaws which, in our opinion, influenced the verdict or which would warrant us in setting it aside. The case was tried in accordance with the principles laid down in the former opinion.

No error.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6890** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. MICHAEL D. PAHUTSKI , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Martin K. Reidinger , District Judge. ( 3:07

- cr - 00211

- MR

- 1; 3:12

- cv - 00308

- MR )

Submitted : October 21, 2014 Decided: October 24, 2014

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Michael D. Pahutski, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael D. Pahutski seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certifica te of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reason able jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pahutski has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in t he materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### STATE v. TRAVIS

No. 182 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 330.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 14 July 1977.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 163 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 19
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 163

  To prevent catastrophic failure or shutdown of remote diesel power 
    engines due to emission control devices, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 16, 2019

 Mr. Sullivan (for himself and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

                            February 5, 2019

              Reported by Mr. Barrasso, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prevent catastrophic failure or shutdown of remote diesel power 
    engines due to emission control devices, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Alaska Remote Generator Reliability 
and Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. REVISION OF REGULATIONS REQUIRED.

    (a) In General.--The Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
Agency shall revise section 60.4216(c) of title 40, Code of Federal 
Regulations (as in effect on the date of enactment of this Act), by 
striking ``that was not certified'' and all that follows through 
``compared to engine-out emissions'' and inserting ``must have that 
engine certified as meeting at least Tier 3 PM standards''.
    (b) Emissions and Energy Reliability Study.--Not later than 1 year 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency, in consultation with the Secretary of 
Energy, shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of 
Representatives a report assessing options for the Federal Government 
to assist remote areas in the State of Alaska in meeting the energy 
needs of those areas in an affordable and reliable manner using--
            (1) existing emissions control technology; or
            (2) other technology that achieves emissions reductions 
        similar to the technology described in paragraph (1).
                                                        Calendar No. 19

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 163

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To prevent catastrophic failure or shutdown of remote diesel power 
    engines due to emission control devices, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            February 5, 2019

                       Reported without amendment
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Subsidiaries of the Registrant:                          State of Incorporation:

C-COR/Comlux, Inc.                                       Pennsylvania

Broadband Management Solutions, LLC                      Delaware

Broadband Capital Corporation                            Delaware

Broadband Royalty Corporation                            Delaware

Worldbridge Broadband Services, Inc.                     Delaware

Convergence.com Corporation                              Georgia

Convergence Systems, Inc.                                Georgia

Silicon Valley Communications, Inc.                      California

MobileForce Technologies, Inc.                           Delaware

MobileForce Technologies GmbH                            Foreign (Europe)

C-COR Electronics Foreign Sales Corporation              St. Thomas, V.I.

C-COR Europe, B.V.                                       Foreign (Europe)

C-COR Europe Holding B.V.                                Foreign (Europe)

C-COR Electronics Canada, Inc.                           Foreign (Canada)

C COR de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                            Foreign (Mexico)
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 20-13      Filed 02/02/2005     Page 1 of 3

Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 20-13      Filed 02/02/2005     Page 2 of 3

Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 20-13      Filed 02/02/2005     Page 3 of 3