alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### MANDATE



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00094

- CV

James Stearns, Appellant

v.

Lisa Martens and Stearns Pools and Spas, Inc., Appellee s Appealed from the 268th District Court of Fort Bend County. (Tr. Ct. No. 09

- DCV

- 169484). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Frost. Justices Christopher and Busby also participating.

TO THE 268TH DISTRICT COURT OF FORT BEND COUNTY,
GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals on August 27, 2015 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment was determined. Our Court of Appeals made its
order in these words:

This cause, an appeal from the divorce decree signed on November 8, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find
error in the divorce decree. We render judgment as follows:

(1) We order that the portions of the divorce decree in which the trial court grant s divorce and di ssolution of the marriage are AFFIRMED ; (2) We order the remainder of the divorce decree REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with this court’s opinion, including
(a) a new jury trial as to the characterization of all one million shares of stock in appellee Stearns Pools and Spas, Inc. (“Stearns Pools”)

, (b) a new bench trial as to the value of Stearns Pools,(c) a just and right division of the community estate in light of the

jury findings as to the characterization of all shares of Stearns Pools stock, the trial court’s new finding s as to the value of Stearns Pools, and the trial court’s other findings at the first bench trial on issues other than the characterization of the Stearns Pools shares or the value of Stearns Pools, and
(d ) rendition of a new divorce decree, which may include a new sanctions order in which the trial court sanctions Jim

, in an amount not to exceed $1,200 as to Lisa and $1,200 as to Stearns Pools

, for failing to appear personally at the court

- ordered mediatio n

. We order appellee s , Lisa Martens and Stearns Pools and Spas, Inc., jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this
decision certified bel ow for observance.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS , the Hon. Kem Thompson Frost , Chief Justice of our Fourteenth Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of H ouston, November 06, 2015.
Case 1:06-cv-15108-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

No. 13

- 626C

(Filed September 22 , 2014 )

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

*

*

MICHAEL ROTH & ASSOC IATES

, *

ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS, INC.

, *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

v. *

*

THE UNITED STATES, *

*

Defendant. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ORDER

Pending before the Court are plaintiff’s motion s to compe l production of

documents and to enlarge the period of time in which to conduct discover y. As

discussed during today ’ s oral hearing, the C ourt orders as follows:

Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to depose Mr. Clifford F arrel l by written

questions pursuant to RCFC 31(a)(2)(A)(ii)

. Plaintiff must serve written q uestions

for Mr. Farrel l on or by September 2 6 , 2014

. Defendant shal l serve Mr. Farrell ’ s

responses on or by October 10, 2014.

Regarding plaintiff ’ s requested deposition of Mr. Eric M i ll er, p laintiff is to file

a supplemental paper with the Court on or by September 26, 2014

, including an y

exhibits in support

, and explaining his need for this additional deposition . The

government shall file its response on or by October 3, 2014.

Plaintiff ’ s request that the government be ordered to prod uce bid documents

relating to the construction project is DENIED o n the ground that the documents,

even if relevant to the plaintiff ’ s claim

, would be unduly burdensome to produce and

duplicative of other evidence ( namely the cost s of the contracts actually awarded).To facilit ate the second dep osition of Mr. Farrell, and further consideration of

the motion to depose Mr. Miller, the Court GRANTS plaintiff ’ s motion for an

enlargement of the period in which to conduct discovery. T he expert disclosure date

shall be O ctober 2 0

, 2014

. T h e close of expert discovery, including depositions,

shall be November 20, 2014

. T he parties shall file a joint status report on or by

D ecember 4 , 2014

, p roposing a schedule for f urther proceeding.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Victor J. Wolski

VICTOR J. WOLSKI

Judge

- 2

-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          18,881
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,164
<PP&E>                                          23,201
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,887
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,685
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           829
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,722
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,081
<SALES>                                         44,050
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,050
<CGS>                                           36,420
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  102,150
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,001
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (58,786)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (10,101)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (48,685)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (48,685)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (6.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (6.01)
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03354-SAS Document 5 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 1 of 1
# Fourth Court **of Appeals San Antonio, Texas** 

MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 13

- 00 272

- CV IN RE QR FIRE PROTECTION, INC. and Ari BIMSTEIN Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice Delivered and Filed: May 15, 2013
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On April 29, 2013, Relators QR Fire Protection, Inc. and Ari Bimstein filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for temporary relief complaining of the trial court’s Order on Petitioner’s Motion to Compel and Order on QR Fire Protection, Inc.’s Motion to Quash and For Protective Order. On May 1, 2013, this court issued an order denying without prejudice the petition for writ of mandamus and indicated that an opinion will follow. However, on May 3, 2013, Relators filed an amended petition for writ of man damus, an amended emergency motion for temporary relief, and an amended record. Therefore, we withdraw the order dated May 1, 2013.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009

- CVH

- 000345

- D4 , In the Matter of the Marriage of Linda Rae Bimstein and Ari Bimstein , pending in the 406 th Judicial District Court , Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr. presiding.04

- 13

- 00272

- CV

- 2

- The court has considered R elators ’ amended petition for writ of manda mus and is of the opinion that R elator s are not enti tled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the amended petition for writ of mandamus and the amended emergency motion for temporary relief are DENIED. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 21




              BAIRNCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   Subsidiaries of Registrant
                      as of March 27, 2000


                                   Percentage    State/Country of
                                   Ownership     Incorporation


Arlon, Inc.                        100%          Delaware
Kasco Corporation                  100%          Delaware
Bairnco Foreign Sales Corporation  100%          Barbados
MII International, Inc. (1)        100%          Delaware
Arlon Adhesives & Films, Inc. (1)  100%          Texas
Arlon Partners, Inc. (1)           100%          Delaware
Arlon Signtech, Ltd. (1)           100%          Texas
Bertram & Graf Gmbh (1)            100%          Germany
Atlantic Service Co. Ltd. (1)      100%          Canada
Atlantic Service Co. (UK) Ltd. (1) 100%          United Kingdom
EuroKasco S.A. (1)                 100%          France





(1) Indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Bairnco Corporation.
#### SHEILA LOCKLEAR BECK, Administratrix of the Estate of Daryl Ivan Beck, Deceased v. CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

No. 398A82

(Filed 7 December 1982)

Appeal and Error § 64— evenly divided court — decision affirmed — no precedent

Where one member of the Supreme Court did not participate in the consideration or decision of a case and the remaining six Justices are equally divided, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed without becoming a precedent.

Justice Martin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Appeal by defendant pursuant to G.S. 7A-30(2) and Rule 14 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure from a decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 57 N.C. App. 373, 291 S.E. 2d 897 (1982), which found no error in trial before *Godwin, Judge,*at the 17 February 1981 Session of WAKE Superior Court.

*Thorp, Anderson, Slifkin, Roten & Clayton, P.A., by Anne R. Slifkin and William L. Thorp; Locklear, Brooks & Jacobs by Dexter Brooks, Attorneys for plaintiff appellee.*

*Fred D. Poisson; Manning, Fulton & Skinner by Howard E. Manning and Michael T. Medford, Attorneys for defendant appellant.*

*Harris, Bumgardner and Carpenter by Seth H. Langson, Attorneys for North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, amicus curiae.*

*Golding, Crews, Meekins, Gordon & Gray, by John G. Golding; Grier, Parker, Poe, Thompson, Bernstein, Gage & Preston, by Irvin W. Hankins, III, Attorneys for North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys, amicus curiae.*

PER CURIAM.

The facts in this case are fully stated in the decision of the Court of Appeals. Judge (now Justice) Harry C. Martin participated in the decision of this case as a member of the Court of Appeals and therefore took no part in the consideration or deci*268sion of the appeal before this Court. The remaining members of this Court were equally divided, three members voting to affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals and three members voting to reverse. Therefore the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed as the law of the case but stands without precedential value.

Affirmed.

Justice MARTIN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 53-14 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 53-14 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 53-14 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 3 of 3
exv10w2











Exhibit 10.2




August 13, 2009




Mr. Donald P. Bunnell




          Re:   Extension of Employment Agreement




Dear Don:




     This letter relates to your employment agreement with us dated July 14, 2006. The employment
period, as specified in paragraph 1 of your employment agreement, expired on April 18, 2009. By
execution of this letter, you acknowledge and agree that the employment period in your employment
agreement shall be extended to August 31, 2010. This letter does not affect any other terms of
your employment agreement except that your base salary has previously been increased by the
Compensation Committee to $15,000 per month. If you have any questions regarding this matter,
please let me know.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.

 	 
	 	/s/ Robert Rigdon
 	 
	 	Robert Rigdon 	 
	 	President and Chief Executive Officer 	 
	 



ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED

as of August 13, 2009




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/ Donald P. Bunnell
 	 	 
	Donald P. Bunnell
Case 1:06-cv-15119-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 06 Civ. 0694 PKC) 

 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

DEFENDANT, YANGMING MARINE 

TRANSPORT CORP.’S NOTICE OF MOTION 

TO DISMISS THE CLAIMS AGAINST IT ON 

GROUND OF A MANDATORY AND 

EXCLUSIVE FOREIGN FORUM SELECTION 

CLAUSE 

 Please take notice that defendant, YANGMING MARINE TRANSPORT CORP., will 

move this Court before the P. Kevin Castel in Courtroom 12-C at the U.S. Courthouse at 500 

Pearl Street, New York, NY for an order dismissing the claims against it on grounds of a 

mandatory and exclusive foreign forum selection agreement. 

 Please take further notice that your answering papers and opposing memoranda must be 

served and filed within the time provided for in Local Civil Rule 6.1(b). 

Dated: New York, NY CICHANOWICZ CALLAN KEANE VENGROW 

 & TEXTOR, LLP, 61 Broadway, Ste. 3000 

 May 18, 2007 New York, NY 10006 – Tel. 212-344-7042 

 By: /s/_____Paul M. Keane_________________ 

 Paul M. Keane [PK-5934] 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 YANGMING MARINE TRANSPORT CORP. 

TO: Opposing Counsel 

NIPPON EXPRESS U.S.A. 

(ILLINOIS), INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 - against - 

M/V CHIANG JIANG BRIDGE et 

ano., 

 Defendants. 

Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 12 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
      32.2





**Certification
      of CEO and CFO Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kansas City
      Power & Light Company (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended
      March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
      date
      hereof (the "Report"), William H. Downey, as President and Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, and Terry Bassham, as Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
      of
      his knowledge:





(1)       The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                William H. DowneyName:
              Title:
            William
                H. Downey
              President
                and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
            May
                5, 2006/s/
                Terry BasshamName:
              Title:
            Terry
                Bassham
              Chief
                Financial OfficerDate:
            May
                5, 2006





This
      certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      and
      is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
      This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liability under that
      section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
      into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 except to the extent this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and specifically
      incorporated by reference in any such filing.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Kansas City Power & Light Company
      and will be retained by Kansas City Power & Light Company and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
#### KALE v. KALE

No. 78 PC.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 99.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 May 1975.
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Katy Industries, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony T. Castor III,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/
      Anthony T. Castor III


Anthony
      T. Castor III


Chief
      Executive Officer


May
      10,
      2007











The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany this report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section
      18 of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company whether made before
      or
      after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
      such
      filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
      or
      other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
      signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
      written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
      and
      will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
AMENDMENT TO GRANT HARTFORD OPTION AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT TO OPTION AGREEMENT is made as of
the 24th day of January, 2008.


	
  BETWEEN

  	
   COMMONWEALTH RESOURCES, L.L.C, (hereinafter referred to as "Commonwealth", a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Montana, whose mailing address is 619 S.W. Higgins Ave., Suite O, Missoula, Montana 59803;

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  AND

  	
  GRANT HARTFORD CORPORATION (hereinafter referred to as "GHC", a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Montana, whose mailing address is 619 S.W. Higgins Ave., Suite O, Missoula, Montana 59803.

  




WHEREAS, the parties hereto
entered into an Option Agreement on or about the 1st
day of June, 2007; and



WHEREAS, the parties believe
it is in their mutual best interests to amend Article 3.1(d) of said Option
Agreement to revise the number of shares of the capital stock of GHC being
issued pursuant to said Option Agreement;



NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing premises, the mutual covenants herein contained
and other good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree that Article
3.1(d) of the said Option Agreement shall be amended to read as follows:


	
  "(d)

  	
  Upon the execution of this Agreement issue to Commonwealth 19,000,000 common shares of the capital stock of GHC;"

  




All other provisions of said
Option Agreement shall remain as originally executed.


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day
and year first above written.


	
  COMMONWEALTH RESOURCES, L.L.C.:

  	
  GRANT HARTFORD CORPORATION:

  




 


	
  By: /s/Aaron L. Charlton   
      Aaron L. Charlton, Member
  Manager

  	
  By: /s/Eric Sauve   
      Eric Sauve,
  President
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 17-21      Filed 02/01/2005     Page 1 of 4

Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 17-21      Filed 02/01/2005     Page 2 of 4

Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 17-21      Filed 02/01/2005     Page 3 of 4

Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 17-21      Filed 02/01/2005     Page 4 of 4
#### IN RE TRUCKING CO.

No. 66.

Reported: 281 N.C. 375.

Petition by McLean Trucking Company to rehear denied 9 August 1972.
Case 1:07-cv-03350-SAS     Document 40      Filed 08/08/2008     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03350-SAS     Document 40      Filed 08/08/2008     Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. COBLE

No. 626P82.

Case below: 59 N.C. App. 238.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 11 January 1983.
Order filed August 11, 2022. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-22-00521-CV

____________

CHRISTOPHER TROY BUSHLOW, Appellant

V.

KIMBERLY TRICKETT BUSHLOW, Appellee

On Appeal from the 231st District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 231-633972-18

ORDER

Appellant has filed a motion challenging the trial court’s denial of his request 

for a free reporter’s record on appeal. Pursuant to Rule 145(g)(3) of the Texas Rules 

of Civil Procedure, we order the Tarrant County District Clerk and the court reporter 

for the 231st District Court to prepare and file with this court the record of all trial 

court proceedings on appellant’s claim of indigence. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(g)(3). 

The record of the trial court proceedings on appellant’s claim of indigence must be 

provided without charge and filed with this court on or before August 25, 2022.
2

Any response to appellant’s motion challenging the ruling by the trial court is 

due on or before September 1, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Spain, Poissant, and Wilson.