alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                             9,901
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                            3,761
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                              3,820
<EQUITIES>                                         902
<MORTGAGE>                                       1,587
<REAL-ESTATE>                                       73
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  17,681
<CASH>                                              18
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               1,533
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           1,380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,818
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 16,864
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                 47
<POLICY-OTHER>                                     172
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                              200
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    742
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              353
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            92
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,818
<PREMIUMS>                                         836
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                805
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 108
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     156
<BENEFITS>                                       1,032
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                         68
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             (146)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    462
<INCOME-TAX>                                       154
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                308
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       290
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.09
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-15013-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7283

DUSTIN A. TURNER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-961-2) Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 12, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.David Bernard Hargett, HARGETT & WATSON, P.L.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Dustin A. Turner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Angelone , No. CA-00-961-2 (E.D. Va. July 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 35 Filed 05/04/2005 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS Document 35 Filed 05/04/2005 Page 2 of 2
****

****

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with the Annual Report of Intergraph Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R. Halsey Wise,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

          (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                     of the Company.

By:         /s/ R. Halsey WiseName:    R. Halsey Wise                                 Title:       President and Chief Executive Officer     Date:      March 10, 2004       

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Intergraph Corporation and will be retained by Intergraph Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
H. R. 5606 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 47 South 

7th Street in Indiana, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘James M. ‘Jimmy’ Stewart Post 

Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JAMES M. ‘‘JIMMY’’ STEWART POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 47 South 7th Street in Indiana, Pennsylvania, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘James M. ‘Jimmy’ Stewart 

Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘James M. ‘Jimmy’ Stewart Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Airman Accounted For From World War II (Holeman, D.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Case 1:06-cv-15032-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Intermagnetics General Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending May 26, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Glenn
H. Epstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


   /s/ Glenn H. Epstein
---------------------------
Glenn H. Epstein
Chief Executive Officer
August 23, 2002
EXHIBIT 23.1











Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To Bairnco Corporation:



We have issued our reports dated January 27, 2005, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule incorporated by referencein the Annual Report of Bairnco Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Bairnco Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 33-36330, effective July 18, 1990 and File No. 33-41313, effective, June 19, 1991).



/s/ Grant Thornton LLP



Orlando, Florida

March 4, 2005
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-59585, 33-
62993, 333-01295, 333-00803 and 333-00247) of our report dated November 5, 1998
appearing on page F-2 of BFX Hospitality Group, Inc's Form 10-K for the year
ended September 30, 1998.  We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Experts" in such Prospectus.





/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP



Fort Worth, Texas
December 23, 1998
#### Hector FRANCO-ORTIZ, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Alberto GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 04-16662.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 2005.**

Decided April 4, 2005.

Hector Franco-Ortiz, Florence, AZ, pro se.

Cynthia M. Parsons, USPX—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Hector Franco-Ortiz, a native and citizen of the Dominican Republic, appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Franco-Ortiz contends that his due process rights were violated because he did not receive notice of the October 27, 1999 hearing at which he was ordered removed in absentia. However, the notice of hearing was sent to Franco-Ortiz’s proper address and was thus reasonably calculated to ensure that it reached Franco-Ortiz. *See Farhoud v. INS,*122 F.3d 794, 796 (9th Cir.1997). This is all that due process requires. *See id.*Accordingly, the district court properly denied this claim.

We have reviewed Franco-Ortiz’s Motion to Implement a Court Order, filed on March 8, 2005. This court granted Franco-Ortiz’s unopposed motion for a stay of removal pending appeal on December 6, 2004. The government, in direct contravention of this order, removed Franco-Ortiz on January 13, 2005. However, in light of the disposition of this appeal, Franco-Ortiz’s motion is denied as moot.

The government’s motion to submit a physical exhibit is also denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 15 Filed 03/11/2008 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 15 Filed 03/11/2008 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 15 Filed 03/11/2008 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 15 Filed 03/11/2008 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 15 Filed 03/11/2008 Page 5 of 5
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 16, 2014

NO. 03-10-00016-CV

TJFA, L.P. and Concerned Citizens and Landowners, Appellants

v.

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Waste Management of Texas, Inc., 

Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PEMBERTON, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on December 9, 2009. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The 

appellants shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
#### LASSITER v. JONES

No. 115 PC.

Case below: 8 N.C. App. 506.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 28 August 1970.
#### STATE v. VERBAL

No. 39 PC.

Case below: 5 N.C. App. 517.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 29 August 1969.
#### WILHITE v. VENEER CO.

No. 390 PC

No. 136 (Fall Term)

Case below: 47 NC App 434

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 16 September 1980.
ex_343550.htm


Exhibit 10.13


 


 


Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy


 


Compensation for our non-employee directors consists of cash, restricted stock unit awards (“RSUs”) and stock options. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the compensation paid to non-employee directors for their service on the Board and its committees and recommends any changes considered appropriate to the full Board for its approval. Each member of our Board who is not our employee receives an annual retainer of $40,000. In addition, our non-employee directors receive the following cash compensation for Board services, as applicable:


 


	 	
			●

				
			the Board Chair receives an additional annual retainer of $30,000;

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			the Audit Committee Chair receives an additional annual retainer of $20,000;

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			the Finance and Strategic Transactions Committee (“FAST Committee”) Chair receives an additional annual retainer of $20,000;

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			the Compensation Committee Chair receives an additional annual retainer of $15,000;

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair receives an additional annual retainer of $10,000;

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			an Audit Committee member receives an additional annual retainer of $10,000;

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			a FAST Committee member receives an additional annual retainer of $10,000;

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			a Compensation Committee member receives an additional annual retainer of $7,500; and

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee member receives an additional retainer of $5,000.

			



 


Beginning in February 2022, upon election or appointment to our Board, a new non-employee director will be granted an initial stock option to purchase 46,500 shares of our common stock, which will vest as to 1/3rd of the shares subject to the option on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant and as to the remaining shares subject to the option on an equal monthly basis over the following two-year period, and 23,250 RSUs, which will vest as to 1/3rd of the RSUs on each anniversary of the date of grant over a three-year period. Each non-employee director who is then serving as a director or who is elected to our Board on the date of an annual meeting will be granted a stock option to purchase 31,000 shares of our common stock, which will vest in full on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant, and 15,500 RSUs, which will vest in full on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant.


 


All Board and committee retainers accrue and are payable on a quarterly basis at the end of each calendar quarter of service. We continue to reimburse our non-employee directors for travel, lodging and other reasonable expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at Board or committee meetings.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LANCE SALTZMAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-4181

[December 17, 2014]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 502006CF008164.

Lance M. Saltzman, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s untimely and 

successive rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. We reject 

appellant’s claim that the trial court was required to consider the 

“supplemental ground” that he filed before the State had responded to his 

motion. The supplemental ground was unauthorized because, effective 

July 1, 2013, appellant needed leave of Court to file an amendment after 

the court had issued an order requiring a response. Fla. R. Crim. P. 

3.850(e); In re Amendments to Fla. Rules of Criminal Procedure, 132 So. 3d 

734 (Fla. 2013).

Further, we have reviewed the “supplemental ground” and find that it 

raises a frivolous and procedurally barred claim regarding an alleged 

defect in the charging information. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.140(o). Appellant is 

cautioned that the filing of frivolous postconviction proceedings may result 

in the sanction of the courts no longer accepting his pro se filings and 

referral to prison officials for disciplinary procedures. See State v. Spencer, 

751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999); § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2014). 

Affirmed. 
2

TAYLOR, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit
      23.1**




Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Form S-8
      Nos. 333-121457 of Epoch Holding Corporation and 33-86078 of Jackpot
      Enterprises, Inc., and Registration Statement Form S-3 Nos. 333-139443 and
      333-143163 of Epoch Holding Corporation, of our report dated September 15,
      2008
      appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Epoch Holding Corporation
      (formerly known as J Net Enterprises, Inc. and Jackpot Enterprises, Inc.) for
      the year ended June 30, 2008.




/s/
                CF & Co., L.L.P.CF
                & Co., L.L.P.




Dallas,
      Texas


September
      15, 2008
#### STATE v. SETZER

No. 116 PC.

Case below: 35 N.C. App. 734.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 June 1978.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          16,356
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       66
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         79
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,563
<PP&E>                                           6,417
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,970
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,766
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           389
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,717
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,084
<SALES>                                         10,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,518
<CGS>                                            2,277
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (193)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (11,397)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,543
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7,854)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  14,512
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,658
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.96
        

</TABLE>