alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.1.1





Compensation
Arrangements with Directors and Named Executive Officers





Following
is a description of certain disclosed compensatory arrangements with Shahid
Malik.





In
January 2008, the Compensation and Development Committee of the Great Plains
Energy Board clarified the treatment of outstanding grants of restricted stock
and performance shares held by employees of Strategic Energy under Great Plains
Energy’s Long-Term Incentive Plan dated as of May 7, 2002 (Plan) in order to
provide that such awards would vest, and thus would become payable, in the event
that Great Plains Energy were to cease to own, directly or indirectly, more than
80% of the outstanding equity interest in Strategic Energy.  Shahid
Malik, who is Executive Vice President of Great Plains Energy and the President
and Chief Executive Officer of Strategic Energy, is a “named executive officer”
of Great Plains Energy (as defined in applicable SEC regulations) and a
participant in the Plan.





On April
1, 2008, the Management Committee of Strategic Energy took action determining
that the cash portion of the awards outstanding under the Strategic Energy
Executive Committee Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) for the performance
periods of 2006-2008 and 2007-2009 will be deemed fully earned and payable at
the target (100%) level as of the closing date of the sale of the membership
interests in Strategic Energy to Direct Energy Services, LLC (“Direct Energy”)
pursuant to the Purchase Agreement among Great Plains Energy, Direct Energy and
Custom Energy Holdings, L.L.C., dated as of April 1, 2008.  Mr. Malik
is a participant in the Plan.  The cash portion of Mr. Malik’s awards
under the Plan that would be payable on such closing date is approximately
$802,000.





On May 6,
2008, the independent members of the Great Plains Energy board of directors
authorized the payment, effective as of the closing date of the pending sale of
Strategic Energy to Direct Energy Services, LLC, of cash amounts to certain
Strategic Energy officers, including Mr. Malik.  These payments
reflect, for each recipient, the cash amount of incentive compensation that
would have been payable, at target performance, had customary grants been made
in 2008 pursuant to Strategic Energy’s annual and long term incentive
compensation plans, prorated for the period of time between the beginning of the
year and the sale closing date.  If the sale closes in the second
quarter of 2008, as expected, Mr. Malik’s pro rated payment would be about
$250,000, and would be in addition to any other compensation payable to Mr.
Malik as a result of the sale.
Case 1:06-cv-15020-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15114-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
      THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Epoch Holding Corporation (the "Company")
      on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), William
      W.
      Priest, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Adam Borak, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and
      for,
      the periods presented in the Report.








Dated:
      September 29, 2006


By:
      /s/
      William W. Priest




_______________________


William
      W. Priest


Chief
      Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)














Dated:
      September 29, 2006


By:
      /s/
      Adam Borak




_______________________


Adam
      Borak


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly Report of Strategic Internet Investments,
  Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September
  30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the "Report"). I, Abbas Salih, Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify,
  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sction
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

|Date: November 28, 2003 | Abbas Salih                              
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------------
|                        | Abbas Salih
        Chief Financial Officer

---
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
New Jersey Headquarters
150 John F. Kennedy Parkway
Short Hills, NJ 07078






                          Independent Auditors' Report



The Partners
Kamine/Besicorp Beaver Falls L.P.

We have audited the acompanying  balance sheets of Kamine/Besicorp  Beaver Falls
L.P. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related statements of operations,
partners'  equity  (deficiency),  and cash  flows  for each of the  years in the
three-year  period ended December 31, 1997.  These financial  statements are the
responsibility  of the general  partners.  Our  responsibility  is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We  conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  generally   accepted  auditing
standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the  accounting  principles  used and  significant  estimates  made by
management,  as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,  the financial  statements  referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects,  the financial  position of Kamine/Besicorp  Beaver Falls
L.P. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period  ended  December 31,
1997 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.



                                                        /s/KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP



February 24, 1998
Case 1:06-cv-15152-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
HEI, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-33322, 33-46928, 33-46929 and 333-49489) on Form S-8 of HEI, Inc. of
our reports dated October 5, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of HEI, Inc. and subsidiaries, as of August 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended August 31, 2001 and
the related financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the August 31,
2001 annual report on Form 10-K of HEI, Inc.


                                    KPMG LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 4, 2001
Case 7:07-cv-03318-CS     Document 32      Filed 12/11/2007     Page 1 of 1
#### THOMPSON v. CITY OF SALISBURY

No. 57. PC.

Case below: 24 N.C. App. 616.

. Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 May 1975.
Case 1:06-cv-15127-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-14991-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.2


                       Consent of Independent Accountants

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-55218) on Form S-3 and the registration statement (No. 333-45560) on Form
S-8 of Brek Energy Corporation (formerly First Ecom.com, Inc.) of our report
dated February 28, 2000 relating to the consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1999 and
the period from September 16, 1998 to December 31, 1998, which report appears in
the December 31, 2001, annual report on Form 10-K of Brek Energy Corporation.

Yours faithfully

KPMG

Hong Kong
April 8, 2002
#### Sabah A. RAHIM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-10648.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 2, 2005.

Ingram Law Firm, McAllen, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Henry Ernest Velte, III, Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Sabah A. Rahim appeals the district court’s affirmance of the Commissioner’s denial of his claim for Supplemental Secu*525rity Income benefits. Rahim contends that the Commissioner erred by finding (1) that he was not disabled during the relevant period and (2) that such a finding is improper without the Commissioner’s discussing in the written decision six evidentiary factors set forth in *Loza v. Apfel,*219 F.3d 378 (5th Cir.2000).

Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the Commissioner’s decision regarding Rahim’s complaints of pain and the severity of his impairments is supported by substantial evidence. The record also shows that the Administrative Law Judge fully developed the record and considered all of the medical evidence under the appropriate standard before rendering his decision, which the Commissioner adopted. *See Stone v. Heckler,*752 F.2d 1099, 1101 (5th Cir.1985).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Case 1:06-cv-15028-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### CIRRUS LOGIC, INC., Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee.

No. 05-1249.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 31, 2005.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).
#### STATE v. HALTOM

No. 105 PC and No. 107.

Case below: 19 N.C. App. 646.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 9 January 1974. Appeal dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question 9 January 1974.
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 6 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 6 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 6 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of The X-Change  Corporation on
Form  10-QSB/A  for the period  ending  September  30,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Sheriff,  President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael Sheriff
Michael Sheriff, President, Chief
Executive Officer , Treasurer and Chairman
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)


March 24, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Kenneth DRIESSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TEHAMA COUNTY; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-15183.

D.C. No. CV-03-00069-GEB/KJM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 2005.*

Decided April 4, 2005.

Kenneth Driessen, Hayward, WI, Pro se.

*179Laurence L. Angelo, Angelo, Kilday & Kilduff, Joseph E. Maloney, USSAC—Office of the U.S. Attorney, and Constance L. Picciano, AGCA—Office of the California Attorney General (SAC) Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA; and Dennis Halsey, Chico, CA, for Defendants—Appellees.

Before B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Kenneth Driessen appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising out of his arrest for transporting marijuana. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo dismissals for failure to state a claim. *Ramirez v. Galaza,*334 F.3d 850, 853 (9th Cir.2003). We affirm in part, and vacate and remand in part.

We agree with the district court that Driessen’s constitutional challenge to marijuana laws, and illegal search and unreasonable arrest claims, are barred by *Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), because a judgment in Driessen’s favor on these claims would necessarily impugn the validity of his guilty plea conviction, and Driessen failed to allege that his conviction has been invalidated. *See id.*at 486-87.

However, the district court improperly dismissed Driessen’s excessive force claim because success on the merits of this claim would not necessarily imply or demonstrate that Driessen’s earlier conviction was invalid. *See Smith v. City of Hemet,*394 F.3d 689, 699 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

Accordingly, we vacate and remand for further proceedings on Driessen’s excessive force claim, and affirm the district court’s dismissal of the remaining claims.

We decline to consider Dreissen’s contentions regarding issues he raised for the first time on appeal. *See Jiminez v. Rice,*276 F.3d 478, 481 (9th Cir.2001).

Appellee City of Coming’s November 10, 2004 motion to supplement the record and its request for judicial notice are granted.

Appellee County of Tehama’s November 12, 2004 motion to strike documents in the excerpts of record is denied.

Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal.

AFFIRMED in part, VACATED and REMANDED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### STATE v. CHEEK

No. 5 PC.

Case below: 10 N.C. App. 273.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 3 March 1971.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
               CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
Biomet, Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on
the date hereof:

(a)  The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the Fiscal Year Ended
     May 31, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
     Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Dane A. Miller
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Dane A. Miller, Ph.D.
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        August 22, 2003



                                        /s/ Gregory D. Hartman
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Gregory D. Hartman
                                        Senior Vice President - Finance,
                                        Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                        August 22, 2003



The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be deemed to be
considered filed as part of the Form 10-K.
Case 1:06-cv-14853-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 11 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15016-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-14955-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14955-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14955-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14955-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14955-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14955-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14955-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14955-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14955-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14955-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14955-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14955-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14955-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15046-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 21
  SUBSIDIARIES
    OF THE COMPANY
    Jurisdiction ofName of Subsidiary

IncorporationEmulex Corporate Services Corporation

CaliforniaEmulex Corporation

CaliforniaEmulex Design & Manufacturing Corporation

DelawareEmulex Communications Private Limited

Karnataka, Bangalore, IndiaArcxel Technologies, Inc.

CaliforniaHyland Enterprise Development, Inc.

CaliforniaEmulex Limited

United KingdomEmulex Europe Limited (in dissolution)

United KingdomInterConnections, Inc. (inactive)

WashingtonEmulex International Limited

Isle of ManEmulex Isle of Man Administration, Limited

Isle of ManEmulex Isle of Man Base Company

Isle of ManEmulex Ireland Company Limited

IrelandEmulex Luxembourg S.à r.l.

LuxembourgEmulex Germany GmbH (in formation)

Germany
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1646 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1646

To designate the community-based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
 Veterans Affairs in St. Augustine, Florida, as the ``Leo C. Chase Jr. 
                Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 23 (legislative day, May 22), 2019

   Mr. Rubio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the community-based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
 Veterans Affairs in St. Augustine, Florida, as the ``Leo C. Chase Jr. 
                Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF LEO C. CHASE JR. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS CLINIC.

    (a) Designation.--The community-based outpatient clinic of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs located at 207 Stratton Road, St. 
Augustine, Florida, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act 
be known and designated as the ``Leo C. Chase Jr. Department of 
Veterans Affairs Clinic''.
    (b) Reference.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference to 
the Leo C. Chase Jr. Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:06-cv-15043-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1