alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. LAWSON

No. 137 PC.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 171.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 5 February 1974.
Case 1:06-cv-14970-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. GARNETT

No. 111.

Case below: 24 N.C. App. 489.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 17 April 1975.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (3.28 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Case 1:07-cv-03327-DC     Document 22      Filed 10/26/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03327-DC     Document 22      Filed 10/26/2007     Page 2 of 2
Presidential Documents

69419 

Federal Register 

Vol. 70, No. 219 

Tuesday, November 15, 2005 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of November 10, 2005 

Determinations Under Section 1106(a) of the Omnibus Trade 

and Competitiveness Act of 1988—Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 

Memorandum for the United States Trade Representative 

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Saudi Arabia) is seeking to become a Member 

of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Saudi Arabia has concluded a 

bilateral agreement with the United States related to Saudi Arabia’s accession 

to the WTO. Saudi Arabia’s commitments under this bilateral agreement 

with the United States ensure: (1) that all state trading enterprises, as defined 

in section 1107(6) of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 

(the ‘‘Act’’) (19 U.S.C. 2906(6)), will make (a) purchases that are not for 

government use and (b) sales in international trade, in accordance with 

commercial considerations, including price, quality, availability, marketability, and transportation, and (2) that such state trading enterprises will 

afford U.S. business firms adequate opportunity, in accordance with customary practice, to compete for such purchases and sales. 

In accordance with section 1106(a)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2905(a)(1)), 

I determine that state trading enterprises account for a significant share 

of the exports of Saudi Arabia and the goods that compete with imports 

into Saudi Arabia. Further, I determine that, based on the bilateral agreement 

that Saudi Arabia has entered into with the United States, information 

provided and commitments set forth in the Report of the Working Party 

on the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s Accession to the WTO, and other information considered in connection with Saudi Arabia’s WTO accession negotiations including information in the United States National Energy Policy 

report, an affirmative determination under section 1106(a)(2) is not warranted. 

The determinations under section 1106(a) are intended solely to further 

the purpose of section 1106 and are not determinative for the purpose 

of any other statute or regulation. 

You are directed to publish this memorandum in the 

W 

Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, November 10, 2005. 

[FR Doc. 05–22798 

Filed 11–14–05; 11:32 am] 

Billing code 3190–01–P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan A. TREVINO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-20660.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 14, 2005.

*550James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Mikas Kalinauskas, Dora Beatriz Tognarelli, Baker Botts, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Juan A. Trevino challenges his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute marijuana. Specifically, he challenges the district court’s findings as to the drug quantity that was used to enhance his sentence. He argues that the key witness the government used to establish drug quantity was unreliable. The district court judge did not hear testimony from the informant after the government opposed the drug quantity and argued that the informant was not credible.

In an unpublished opinion, this court has dealt with this issue in the appeal of three of Trevino’s co-defendants. *See United States v. Jesus Lorenzo Ayala, Manuel Lorenzo Garcia and Armando Perez,*107 Fed.Appx. 410 (5th Cir.2004). In that ease, three of Trevino’s co-defendants objected to the district court’s finding of drug quantity on the identical ground raised by Trevino. The panel made it clear that the district court was not bound by the United States’ concession regarding drug quantity. However, it concluded that the district court committed clear error by basing its findings on drug quantity on statements of an informant identified by the government as unreliable without hearing the informant’s testimony. As the government concedes, there is no principled basis to reach a different result in this identical case.2

We therefore vacate Trevino’s sentence and remand his case for resentencing and to give the district court an opportunity to determine the credibility of the government informant after hearing his testimony. The district court may sentence Trevino either on the quantity of drugs seized or hear the informant’s testimony and sentence Trevino based on the court’s evaluation of his credibility with respect to drug quantities in addition to the drugs seized.

VACATED and REMANDED.

1

. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

2

. Although Trevino signed a plea agreement containing a waiver of this right to appeal, we need not enforce a waiver of appeal when the government does not ask us to do so. *United States*v. *Rhodes,*253 F.3d 800, 804 (5th Cir. 2001). Trevino also argues that his plea agreement should be vacated on the basis of Rule 11 violations by the district court and ineffective assistance of counsel. Given our disposition of this case, we need not address those issues.
#### MAYNARD ALVES and JACOLYN ALVES, Husband and Wife, Appellants, v. HORTON BUMGUARDNER and DARLENE BUMGUARDNER, Husband and Wife, Respondents.

No. 7921

December 22, 1975

544 P.2d 436

*James F. Sloan,*Reno, for Appellants.

C. *E. Horton,*Ely, for Respondents.

OPINION

. *Per Curiam:*

Appellants contend the district court erroneously determined that the parties intended certain small tools and equipment to be included in the sale of appellants’ ranch to respondents.

The court’s determination is based on substantial evidence and will not be set aside on appeal. County of Clark v. Lucas, 91 Nev. 263, 534 P.2d 499 (1975); Kulik v. Albers Incorporated, 91 Nev. 134, 532 P.2d 603 (1975); Fletcher v. Fletcher, 89 Nev. 540, 516 P.2d 103 (1973); Picking v. Day and Night Elec., Inc., 87 Nev. 5, 479 P.2d 461 (1971).

*800Appellants argue that the Uniform Commercial Code is applicable to the transaction. In that this argument is first raised on appeal and supported by no authority, we will not entertain it. Solar, Inc. v. Electric Smith Constr., 88 Nev. 457, 499 P.2d 649 (1972); Howarth v. El Sobrante Mining Corp., 87 Nev. 492, 489 P.2d 89 (1971); Britz v. Consolidated Casinos Corp., 87 Nev. 441, 488 P.2d 911 (1971); Young Elec. Sign Co. v. Erwin Elec. Co., 86 Nev. 822, 477 P.2d 864 (1970).

Numerous other contentions of appellants being without merit, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
Case 1:07-cr-00345-SAS Document 3 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Katy Industries, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Amir Rosenthal,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/
      Amir Rosenthal


Amir
      Rosenthal


Chief
      Financial Officer


November
      14, 2006











The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany this report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section
      18 of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company whether made before
      or
      after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
      such
      filing. A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the
      Company and will
      be retained by the
      Company and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
get started

Motor vehicle-related incidents are a leading cause 

of line-of-duty deaths for law enforcement officers 

in the United States—they are also preventable. 

It is important to promote motor vehicle safety

among patrol officers so they can stay safe while 

working to make communities safer.

This toolkit provides one month of messages to encourage 

conversation about seat belt use, speeding, distraction, and 

stress response for patrol officers working behind the wheel. 

With 40 safety messages covering four topics, you and other law 

enforcement leaders can cover one message per day, one theme 

per week. Because there are extra messages, you can adapt the 

toolkit to your agency’s schedule, policies, and other needs.

Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health

Roll Call Talk about safety when you have 

the group’s attention at the start of the 

workday, or include a printed safety message 

in the roll call book. 

Posters Print safety messages and post 

them in a common area.

Dispatch On each shift, have dispatchers 

remind officers to drive safely. 

Mobile Data Terminal Display a safety 

message when officers access an MDT.

Decal Give officers the Drive to Arrive Alive

decal for their vehicle door or dashboard.

Toolkit Manager Sheet

For outdoor use, 

print on a white 

vinyl background 

with UV coating 

to make it last 

longer. A glossy 

sticker with UV coating will work 

for indoor use.

Printing: Most online printers 

allow JPG uploads for positioning 

and typically offer previews before 

ordering. Call or check with the 

vendor for details. Traditional, 

in-person printers can use a highresolution PDF for printing, and 

can print in sheets or on a roll. 

Ask how decals will be scored/cut 

for distribution. 

download

the toolkit

Visit www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/

leo to access safety messages 

and a decal to share with your 

patrol officers.

incorporate messaging into the workday

decal printing instructions

NIOSH

@NIOSH_MVSafety

involve your officers 

officer road code toolkit
U.S. Department of Labor Employment Standards Administration 

Office of Workers· Compensation Programs 

Otvision of Longshore and 

May 1, 2003 Harbor Workers' Compensation 

Washington, D.C. 2021 O 

File Number. Notice 10 8 

SELF-INSURANCE PRIVILEGE 

Longshore and Harbor 

Workers' Compensation Act 

Amount of Securities$ 

Letter of Credit$ 

Outer Continental Shelf 

Lands Act 

Amount of Securities$ 

Letter of Credit$ 

To Whom It May Concern: 

Defense Base Act 

Amount of Securities$ 

Letter of Credit$ 

Nonappropriated Fund 

Instrumentalities Act 

Amount of Securities$ 

Letter of Credit_$ 

In connection with your authorization as a self-insured employer 

under the Federal Act marked above, you are advised that the 

privilege of self-insurance has been renewed for the year 

beginning July 1, 2003, subject to the maintenance of adequate 

security. 

If your company is interested in exchanging its security in the 

Federal Reserve Bank with a letter of credit then you should 

contact the insurance branch of this Office. The telephone 

number is (202) 693-0910. 

Whenever in the opinion of this the amount of security 

posted by a self-insurer is insufficient to afford adequate 

security for the payment of compensation and medical expenses 

under the Act(s), the self-insurer shall, upon demand by this 

, file such additional amount of security as this Office 

may require (20 CFR 703.309). 

This self-insurance authorization cannot be transferred, and it 

cannot be assigned. Any change involving the corporate name, 

structure, ownership, organization, etc., may affect the selfinsurance authority and must be brought to the attention of this 

Office prior to the effective date of the event. 

Sincerely, r. 

I F I 

{lJLb;JJ G__:._ 

MICHAEL NISS, Director 

Division of Longshore and 

Harbor Workers' Compensation 

Working for America's Workforce
#### Giuseppe Macaluso, Appellant, *v.*Traube-Berger Company, Respondent.

*Macaluso*v. *Traube-Berger Co.,*172 App. Div. 898, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted November 1, 1918;

decided November 19, 1918.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 27, 1916, *unanimously*affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon an order of the court at a Trial Term setting aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff and directing a dismissal of the complaint in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained-by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant. Plaintiff while crossing Flatbush avenue, Brooklyn, from the east to the west side, not at a crossing but in the middle of the block between Newkirk avenue and Stephens court, passed directly in front of an approaching south-bound trolley car. When he left the track on which it was running it was only three or four feet away from him. He kept right on and was struck by the-defendant’s automobile, which was going southerly alongside of the trolley car three or four feet west of the car. The trial judge set aside the verdict in plaintiff’s favor and dismissed the complaint on the ground- that plaintiff had failed to affirmatively show his own freedom from contributory negligence or any negligent act or acts of the chauffeur in the operation and running of his *695automobile. The Appellate Division based its affirmance upon the ground that the evidence, as matter of law, affirmatively established that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence.

*Sydney A. Syme*for appellant.

*Henry Siegrist*and *Fred H. Bees*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ.
# Airman Accounted For From World War II (Uhrin, M.)

/ Published Dec. 13, 2022
WASHINGTON,
EXHIBIT 10.24

NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN ROBERT GARIN AND
OXBORO MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL, INC.

THIS AGREEMENT is made effective as of the 20th day of April, 1999, between Oxboro Medical International, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the
"Company"), and Robert S. Garin (the "Optionee") on the terms and conditions set forth below.

WHEREAS,
the Board of Directors of the Company has decided to permit Nonqualified Stock Options to be granted to certain individuals providing valuable services to the Company, and
any subsidiaries of the Company, to purchase common stock of the Company; and

WHEREAS,
the Company desires the Optionee to secure stock ownership in the Company in order to increase effectiveness and personal interest in the Company;

NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and of the covenants and agreements set forth below, it is mutually agreed as follows:







Notice of Exercise of Nonqualified Stock Options

Oxboro
Medical International, Inc. 
13828 Lincoln Street NE 
Ham Lake, MN 55304

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

The
undersigned is the holder of a nonqualified stock option (the "Option") to purchase shares of the common stock ("Stock") of Oxboro Medical International, Inc. (the
"Company"), pursuant to the Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between            and Oxboro Medical International, Inc., effective as of       
     , 1999. The undersigned
hereby irrevocably elects to exercise the Option to purchase            shares of Stock ("Option Shares"). Enclosed herewith is payment for the Option Shares as required under the Agreement.
The undersigned requests that the certificate representing the Option Shares be issued in the name of the undersigned and delivered to the address set forth below within five (5) business days.

In
connection with the issuance of the Option Shares to the undersigned, the undersigned hereby certifies and represents to the Company that the undersigned is acquiring such shares
for the purpose of investment and not with a view toward distribution. The undersigned understands that these securities have not been registered either under any applicable federal law and rules or
applicable state law and rules and that resale will not be permitted under state law unless the securities are first registered or the sale is a transaction exempt from registration under the
applicable state securities law.

The
undersigned further understands that no sale, offer to sell, or transfer of the Option Shares shall be made unless a registration statement under the federal Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the "Act"), with respect to the Option Shares is then in effect or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Act is then in fact applicable to the Option Shares. The
undersigned understands that a legend reciting this investment restriction shall be placed on any stock certificate that may be issued to the undersigned.

---

Optionee

---

---

---

Address

---

Social Security Number

|Dated: |  |  |  | 
|------ |  |  |  | 
|       |  |  |  |
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 223 (Monday, November 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70103-70104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22984]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB for 
Revision to a Currently Approved Information Collections; Comment 
Request

AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The NCUA intends to submit the following information 
collections to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).

[[Page 70104]]

This information collection is published to obtain comments from the 
public.

DATES: Comments will be accepted until January 20, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to 
NCUA Clearance Officer listed below:
    Clearance Officer: Mr. Neil McNamara, (703) 518-6447, National 
Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 
22314-3428. Fax No. 703-518-6489. E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83eee0ede2eee2f1e2c3ede0f6e2ade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="365b5558575b574457765855435718515940">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
a copy of the information collection request, should be directed to 
Tracy Sumpter at the National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke 
Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428, or at (703) 518-6444.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposal for the following collection of 
information:
    OMB Number: 3133-0143.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Title: 12 CFR part 760. Loans in Areas Having Special Flood 
Hazards.
    Description: Federally insured credit unions are required by 
statute and by 12 CFR part 760 to file reports, make certain 
disclosures and keep records. Borrowers use this information to make 
valid purchase decisions. The NCUA uses the records to verify 
compliance.
    Respondents: All federal credit unions.
    Estimated No. of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 5,350.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Response: 1 hour.
    Frequency of Response: Recordkeeping, Reporting, and on occasion.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 154,850.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: N/A.

    By the National Credit Union Administration Board on November 
14, 2005.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-22984 Filed 11-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>