alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 163 

To prevent catastrophic failure or shutdown of remote diesel power engines 

due to emission control devices, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 16, 2019 

Mr. SULLIVAN (for himself and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 

and Public Works 

A BILL 

To prevent catastrophic failure or shutdown of remote diesel 

power engines due to emission control devices, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alaska Remote Gener5 ator Reliability and Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REVISION OF REGULATIONS REQUIRED. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the Envi8 ronmental Protection Agency shall revise section 

9 60.4216(c) of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (as 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 163 IS

1 in effect on the date of enactment of this Act), by striking 

2 ‘‘that was not certified’’ and all that follows through 

3 ‘‘compared to engine-out emissions’’ and inserting ‘‘must 

4 have that engine certified as meeting at least Tier 3 PM 

5 standards’’. 

6 (b) EMISSIONS AND ENERGY RELIABILITY STUDY.— 

7 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this 

8 Act, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

9 Agency, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy, 

10 shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public 

11 Works of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and 

12 Commerce of the House of Representatives a report as13 sessing options for the Federal Government to assist re14 mote areas in the State of Alaska in meeting the energy 

15 needs of those areas in an affordable and reliable manner 

16 using— 

17 (1) existing emissions control technology; or 

18 (2) other technology that achieves emissions re19 ductions similar to the technology described in para20 graph (1). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
6754 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 8, 2005 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

Program; Designation of Certifying 

Officers

AGENCY: Employment and Training 

Administration; Labor.

ACTION: Notice of designation of 

certifying officers. 

SUMMARY: The trade adjustment 

assistance program operates under the 

Trade Act of 1974 to furnish program 

benefits to domestic workers adversely 

affected in their employment by imports 

of articles which are like or are directly 

competitive with articles produced by 

the firm employing the workers. The 

Trade Adjustment Assistance Reform 

Act of 2002 amended the Trade Act of 

1974, to extend eligibility to those 

workers whose firm shifted production 

to certain foreign countries; to workers 

of upstream supplier firms selling 

components to firms whose workers 

have received a certification of 

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 

assistance; to workers of downstream 

producer firms engaged in assembly or 

finishing for firms whose workers have 

received a certification of eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance 

based on a shift in production or 

increased imports from Mexico or 

Canada; and added the program option 

of alternative trade adjustment 

assistance for older workers over age 50 

years. Workers become eligible for 

program benefits only if the worker 

group is certified under the Act as 

eligible to apply for adjustment 

assistance and/or alternative trade 

adjustment assistance. From time to 

time the agency issues an Order 

designating or redesignating officials of 

the agency authorized to act as 

certifying officers, responsible for 

reviewing and signing adjustment 

assistance determinations. Employment 

and Training Order No. 1–05, was 

issued to revise the listing of officials 

designated as certifying officers, 

superseding the previous Order. 

Employment and Training Order No. 1–

05, is published below.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 31st day of 

January 2005. 

Emily Stover DeRocco, 

Assistant Secretary of Labor, Employment 

and Training Administration.

BILLING CODE 4510–30–P

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 8, 2005 / Notices 6755


EN08FE05.000</GPH>
6756 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 8, 2005 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 05–2305 Filed 2–7–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–30–C


EN08FE05.001</GPH>
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 59 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP     Document 5      Filed 11/14/2005     Page 1 of 2

Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP     Document 5      Filed 11/14/2005     Page 2 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

FRANCISCO VALLE MANJARREZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-50496

D.C. No. 3:12-cr-01449-BEN-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 7, 2014** 

Pasadena, California

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Francisco Valle Manjarrez appeals the 46-month sentence imposed by the

district court following his guilty plea to importing 11.03 kilograms of cocaine into

FILED

AUG 01 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
the United States from Mexico in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We

affirm.

The district court properly refused to consider hypothetical participants

when it found that the defendant was not a minor participant for purposes of

United States Sentencing Guideline § 3B1.2(b). United States v. Rojas-Millan, 234

F.3d 464, 473 (9th Cir. 2000). The district court also properly considered the facts

of the crime. United States v. Hurtado, No. 13-50170, 2014 WL 3720241, at *3

(9th Cir. July 7, 2014); United States v. Rodriguez-Castro, 641 F.3d 1189, 1193

(9th Cir. 2011). The mere fact that the defendant was a courier did not entitle him

to a minor role adjustment. Id. The district court did not clearly err in finding that

the defendant was a run-of-the-mill drug smuggler for money, no better, no worse. 

The defendant accepted payment and a vehicle in exchange for importing a large

quantity of drugs, 11 kilograms of cocaine, into the country. Id.

Nor did the district court abuse its discretion when it sentenced the

defendant to the minimum guideline sentence after considering all of the relevant

sentencing factors.

AFFIRMED.

2
Case 1:06-cv-15090-AKH Document 6 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-15090-AKH Document 6 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09-12-00563-CV

_________________

CROSSTEX NGL PIPELINE, L.P., Appellant

V.

REINS ROAD FARMS-1, LTD., Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 60th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. D-192,430

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM TO CLERK

You are directed to make the following correction in the Opinion dated May 

23, 2013:

On page 5, the first full paragraph, the first sentence that reads, “First, we 

evaluate Crosstex’s claim that the evidence established that pipeline is a crude 

petroleum line.” should be changed to read, “First, we evaluate Crosstex’s claim 

that the evidence established that its pipeline is a crude petroleum line.”
2

You will give notice of this correction in the original Opinion by sending a 

copy of the corrected page accompanied by this memorandum to all interested 

parties who received a copy of the original Opinion.

Entered this the 14th day of October, 2013.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Winthrop Residential Associates I,
A Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-KSB for the annual period
ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.


Date: March 30, 2006                                   /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Michael L. Ashner
                                                       Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 30, 2006                                   /s/ Thomas Staples
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Thomas Staples
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-4699

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DESMAL ALBRIGHT HAIRSTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-98-121) Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 20, 1999Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Stanley Powell, Arlington Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F.Fahey, United States Attorney, Andrew James McKenna, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Desmal Hairston appeals his conviction by a jury for operating a motor vehicle while an habitual offender under the Assimilated Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 13 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999) and Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-357(B)(3) (Michie 1998). Hairston contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of an illegal search and seizure. We conclude that the district court properly found that the search and seizure conducted on a closed military base was proper. See United States v. Jenkins , 986 F.2d 76, 78 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we affirm Hairston’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3(No. 333-131966) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 2-80041, 2-94701, 33-2517, 33-12762, 33-12763, 33-38145, 33-44693, 33-50598, 33-55092, 33-72160, 333-10553, 333-42163, 333-75269, 333-64822 and 333-126818) of Intermagnetics General Corporation of our report dated August 10, 2006  relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedules, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form10-K. 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Albany, New York

August  10, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PLAINS
RESOURCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,714
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,597
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     22,802
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,780
<PP&E>                                         593,587
<DEPRECIATION>                                 180,279
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 556,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          132,791
<BONDS>                                        285,728
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     20,671
<COMMON>                                         1,670
<OTHER-SE>                                     110,852
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   556,819
<SALES>                                        861,925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               862,244
<CGS>                                          785,528
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  809,306
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,012
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,586
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,327
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,259
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,259
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .77
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 13 Filed 04/10/2008 Page 1 of 1
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 94-3 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 94-3 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 2 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 94-3 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 3 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 94-3 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 4 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 94-3 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 5 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 94-3 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 6 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 94-3 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 7 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 94-3 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 8 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 94-3 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 9 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 94-3 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 10 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 94-3 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 11 of 11
Case 1:06-cv-15089-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03222-RPP Document 29 Filed 02/25/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03222-RPP Document 29 Filed 02/25/2008 Page 2 of 2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Soldier Accounted For From Korean War (Murphy, D.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### STATE v. EUELL BALLARD GIBBS.

(Filed 2 March, 1966.)

Appeal by defendant from *McLean, J.,*July 1965 Session of Buncombe.

Defendant was tried on a two-count bill of indictment. The first count charged that defendant forged a certain check dated April *64822, 1965, for $72.00, purportedly drawn by “E. Y. Ponder” on the Citizens Bank of Marshall, North Carolina, payable to the order of defendant. The second count charged that defendant uttered said check. After trial, the jury, as to each count, returned a verdict of guilty “as charged in the bill of indictment.” As to each count, the court pronounced judgment imposing a prison sentence of not less than nine nor more than ten years, the two sentences to run concurrently. Defendant excepted and appealed.

*Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Rich for the State.*

*B. B. Worsham for defendant appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The State offered evidence tending to show the name “E. Y. Ponder” is a forgery; that defendant either wrote “E. Y. Ponder” or was present, aiding and abetting, when another person did so; and that defendant took the check, endorsed it and delivered it to Sams Motor Sales, Inc., which credited $50.00 on defendant’s debt to it and gave defendant $22.00 in cash.

There was plenary evidence to require submission to the jury and to support the verdict as to each count. Moreover, careful consideration of defendant’s assignments discloses no error deemed of such prejudicial nature as to justify a new trial or to require particular discussion.

It is noted that the prison sentences imposed are within the maximum limits provided by G.S. 14-119 and by G.S. 14-120. Whether defendant should be granted relief by way of reduction of the sentences is a matter for decision by the Board of Paroles.

No error.

Moore, J., not sitting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Winthrop
Residential Associates I, A Limited Partnership and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1998       
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1998       
<PERIOD-END>                     DEC-31-1998       
<CASH>                               455,000       
<SECURITIES>                               0       
<RECEIVABLES>                              0       
<ALLOWANCES>                               0       
<INVENTORY>                                0       
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           0       
<PP&E>                                     0       
<DEPRECIATION>                             0       
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       891,000       
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      0       
<BONDS>                              289,000       
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0       
<PREFERRED>                                0       
<COMMON>                                   0       
<OTHER-SE>                           554,000       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         891,000       
<SALES>                                    0       
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      27,000<F1>
<CGS>                                      0       
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          5,000       
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0       
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    27,000       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (86,000)      
<INCOME-TAX>                               0       
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (86,000)      
<DISCONTINUED>                             0       
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0       
<CHANGES>                                  0       
<NET-INCOME>                         (86,000)      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (3.24)      
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (3.24)      
<FN>
<F1>
Includes a $23,000 loss on sale of investment in a Local Limited Partnership.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 5, 2022

NO. 03

- 22

- 00402

- CR

Jamie Eugene Cotton , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the tr i a l court. Having reviewed

the r ecord, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal . Therefore, the Court

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay

costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.