alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### DAVES v. INSURANCE CO.

No. 3 PC.

Case below: 3 N.C. App. 82.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 21 January 1969.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-41108 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOHN MARTIN GAY, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-293-1

- - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1999 Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for John Martin Gay has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Gay has not filed a response. We have independently reviewed counsel’s brief and the record and have found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# FOR INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 05-22275 Filed 11-3-05; 2:51 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Case 1:06-cv-14967-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM BAIRNCO'S 1996 ANNUAL
REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         855,000                 855,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,298,000              22,298,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   822,000                 822,000
<INVENTORY>                                 23,499,000              23,499,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            52,500,000              52,500,000
<PP&E>                                      84,531,000              84,531,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              46,255,000              46,255,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             102,600,000             102,600,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,159,000              22,159,000
<BONDS>                                     24,717,000              24,717,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       112,000                 112,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,352,000              49,352,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               102,600,000             102,600,000
<SALES>                                     38,665,000             150,234,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,665,000             150,234,000
<CGS>                                       25,330,000              97,698,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,330,000              97,698,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             460,000               1,725,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,157,000              13,231,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,068,000               4,896,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,089,000               8,335,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,089,000               8,335,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22                    0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22                    0.85
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-14975-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

 

(1)           The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSBfor the period ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the accompanyingReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: December 28, 2005 |   | /s/ Kenneth W. Brimmer               |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |   Chief  Executive Officer |
|                         |   |                                 |
|                         |   |                                 |
| Date: December 28, 2005 |   | /s/ Mark F. Buckrey                  |   |
|                         |   |   Chief  Financial Officer |
|                              |        |                                      |        |  |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       4,851,283
<SECURITIES>                                 4,959,023
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,632,350
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                  6,599,370
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,124,243
<PP&E>                                       3,829,172
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,675,559
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,277,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,813,755
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       623,773
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,784,713
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,408,486
<SALES>                                     24,718,974
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,718,974
<CGS>                                        9,578,116
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,603,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (453,309)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,542,713
<INCOME-TAX>                                   297,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,245,713
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,245,713
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
        

</TABLE>
EEOICPA MEMORANDUM

Date: 10/29/01

To: District Offices

From: Branch of Policies, Regulations and Procedures

Re: Renal Cancers – Covered SEC Cancer

Section 30.5 (dd) of the regulations lists the specific types of cancer a member of the 

Special Exposure Cohort must be diagnosed with in order to be considered eligible for 

benefits. These types of cancer are defined in Section 3621(17) of the Energy Employees 

Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act (EEOICPA).

On July 24, 2001, Public Law 107-20 was signed into law. Section 2403 of Public Law 

107-20 amended Section 3621(17) of the EEOICPA, effective October 1, 2001, by 

adding renal cancers to the list of SEC cancers. 

Thus, any Special Exposure Cohort claim for renal cancer filed should be developed to 

ensure 1) the employee was a member of the Special Exposure Cohort ; and 2) medical 

evidence from a qualified medical specialist has been submitted which confirms a 

diagnosis of renal cancer and provides the date of diagnosis. 

Inclusion in the Special Exposure Cohort precludes any need to establish causation 

between the renal cancer and covered employment through the dose reconstruction 

process. A causal relationship is presumed if the employee is included in the Special 

Exposure Cohort. However, a distinction is made between a diagnosis of renal cancer 

and a diagnosis of renal disease. The medical evidence submitted by the claimant should 

be carefully reviewed to determine which condition is being claimed. Renal cancer is 

defined as malignant tumors in all parts of the kidney including the renal pelvis. Renal 

disease is defined as a group of chronic conditions of the renal tissues that result in 

inflammation, fibrosis and ultimately may end in renal failure. Renal cancer is what is 

referred to in this amendment, rather than renal disease.

If it is determined the employee was not a member of the Special Exposure

Cohort, the claim for renal cancer should be processed through the dose reconstruction 

process.
ex_10-3.htm


 Exhibit 10.3





AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN
ROBERT C. BARRY, JR., FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK

AND FEDFIRST FINANCIAL CORPORATION









WHEREAS, Robert C. Barry, Jr. entered into an employment agreement with First Federal Savings Bank (the “Bank”) and FedFirst Financial Corporation (the “Company”) effective March 31, 2006 (the “Employment Agreement”); and





WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Bank has resolved to amend the Employment Agreement effective June 1, 2009, to reflect an adjustment made to Mr. Barry’s base salary.





NOW, THEREFORE, the Bank, the Company and Mr. Barry hereby agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:





Effective June 1, 2009, Section 4(a) shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following new Section 4(a):





“The Bank agrees to pay the Executive an annual base salary of $162,500, payable inaccordance with the customary payroll practices of the Bank.  Executive may have part ofhis compensation deferred if he chooses.”

 



	ATTEST: 	 	 	FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
/s/ Patrick G. O'Brien
	 	 	
/s/ John L. Lacarte
	 
	
 
	 	 	
 
	 
	
 
	 	 	
 
	 
	ATTEST: 	 	 	FEDFIRST FINANCIAL CORPORATION 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Patrick G. O'Brien 	 	 	/s/ John L. Lacarte 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	ATTEST: 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Patrick G. O'Brien 	 	 	/s/ Robert C. Barry, Jr. 	 
	 	 	 	Robert C. Barry, Jr.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Recent News & Stories             
  -  News Releases             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

-  FIRST 
-   
-   
- 3
- 4
- 5 (current)
- 6
- 7
-   
-   
-  LAST
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7177

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARY LOUISE FORNEY,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:97-cr-00310-LHT-10)

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 22, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claire J. Rauscher, Federal Defender, Charlotte, North Carolina; Matthew Segal, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Mary Louise Forney appeals the district court’s order
denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Forney , No. 1:97-cr-00310-LHT-10 (W.D.N.C. June 26, 2008). We
deny Forney’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### INDIAN TRACE CO. v. SANDERS

No. 190 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 386.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 August 1977.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BROWER and JOHNSON

No. 27 PC

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

INASMUCH as defendants did not assign as error on appeal the failure of the trial judge to place the burden of proving the absence of heat of passion or the absence of self-defense on the state, *see State v. Brower & Johnson,*289 N.C. 644 (1976), they have waived their right now to complain about such errors. *Hankerson v. North Carolina,*--- U.S. ---, 53 L.Ed. 2d 306, 316, n. 8 (1977). Now, therefore, it is

ORDERED by the Court in Conference that defendants’ motion for reconsideration be and it is hereby denied.

This the 12th day of September, 1977.

James G. Exum, Jr. Associate Justice

For the Court
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 13 Filed 03/11/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### McBRYDE v. FEREBEE

No. 207 PC.

Case below: 46 N.C. App. 116.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 15 July 1980.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 99-4463 MARGARET M. ADKINS, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (CR-98-194) Submitted: January 6, 2000 Decided: February 4, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Wayne D. Inge, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Karen L. Bleattler, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________OPINION PER CURIAM: Margaret M. Adkins appeals her conviction for being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (1994). On appeal, Adkins contends that the evidence adduced at trial was not sufficient to support her conviction and that the district court violated Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) by allowing certain testimony regarding her actions and demeanor on the evening of her offense. We have reviewed the evidence of record and find that it amply supports Adkins' conviction. See United States v. Hoyte , 51 F.3d 1239, 1245 (4th Cir. 1995); United States v. Brewer , 1 F.3d 1430, 1437 (4th Cir. 1993). Adkins' contentions amount to little more than an invitation to this court to revisit the credibility of the Government's witnesses, a course of action we routinely decline. See United States v. Murphy , 35 F.3d 143, 148 (4th Cir. 1994). Neither can we discern any error stemming from the district court's failure to exclude testimonydescribing Adkins' actions and appearance on the evening in question. United States v. Powers , 59 F.3d 1460, 1464-65 (4th Cir. 1995). Finding no merit to either of Adkins' contentions on appeal, we affirm the conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
2
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ANTHONY EDELL WILLIS

No. 546A82

(Filed 11 January 1983)

Appeal as of right pursuant to G.S. 7A-30Í2) from a decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, filed 17 August 1982, which affirmed the 5 March 1981 denial by *Judge Godwin,*in Wake County Superior Court, of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. Following Judge Godwin’s denial of the motion to suppress evidence defendant, pursuant to a plea bargain, entered a plea of guilty to simple possession of heroin from which *Judge Thomas Lee*entered judgment on 3 July 1981. Defendant preserved his right to appeal the ruling on his motion to suppress notwithstanding his plea of guilty.

*Attorney General Rufus L. Edmisten, by Assistant Attorney General Jane P. Gray, for the State.*

*Van Camp, Gill and Crumpler, P.A. by William B. Crumpler and Loflin and Loflin by Thomas F. Loflin, III and Robert S. Mahler for the defendant-appellant.*

PER CURIAM.

Having carefully reviewed the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals, the dissent, the briefs and authorities on this issue, we conclude that the result reached and the legal principles applied by the Court of Appeals are correct. Consequently, the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Case 1:07-cv-03301-SAS Document 5 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03301-SAS Document 5 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03301-SAS Document 5 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03301-SAS Document 5 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 4 of 4
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Marine Accounted For From World War II (Reeser, G.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT