alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Certifications**
I, Mack V. Traynor, III, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of HEI, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.      Mack V. Traynor, III
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Katy Industries,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Amir
Rosenthal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


___________________________
Amir Rosenthal
Chief Financial Officer
August 11, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Katy Industries, Inc. and will be
retained by Katy Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                      - 44 -
Case 1:06-cv-14992-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14992-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14992-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14992-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14992-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14992-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14992-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14992-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14992-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14992-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14992-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14992-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14992-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA APPEARANCE

V.

MUZAFFAR IQBAL Case Number: 07 MAG 647 (RLE)

To the Clerk of the Court and all parties of record:

Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for:

MUZAFFAR IQBAL

I certify that I am admitted to practice in this court.

Dated: May 3, 2007 ____________/s/__________________

Neil B. Checkman NC-9232

111 Broadway, Suite 1305

New York, New York 10006

(212) 264-9940 -office

(212) 346-4665- fax

Case 1:07-mj-00647-UA Document 8 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 16 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 16 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 21 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 21 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 21 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 21 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 21 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 21 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 21 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 21 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 21 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 9 of 9
#### UTILITIES COMM. v. FARMERS CHEMICAL ASSOC.

No. 199 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 433.

Petition by Utilities Comm, for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 August 1977 pursuant to Appellate Procedure Rule 15(h).
#### WRAY v. HUGHES

No. 89 PC.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 678.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 May 1980.
#### STATE v. ISLEY

No. 105 PC.

Case below: 8 N.C. App. 599.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 July 1970.
Case 1:06-cv-15014-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF DALLAS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 25th day of February, 2015, the 

cause on appeal to affirm between

BRIAN GLENN JORDAN, Appellant

No. 05-14-00358-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court

No. 2, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F09-33222-I.

Opinion delivered by Justice Evans, Chief 

Justice Wright and Justice Myers 

participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and executed.

WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with the 

Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 7

th day of May, 2015.

LISA MATZ, Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1561 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1561

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to provide to the 
  Secretary of Homeland Security certain information with respect to 
         unaccompanied alien children, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2019

Mrs. Blackburn (for herself, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Hawley, and Mr. Cotton) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to provide to the 
  Secretary of Homeland Security certain information with respect to 
         unaccompanied alien children, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Accountability for Care of 
Unaccompanied Alien Children Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. INFORMATION SHARING WITH RESPECT TO UNACCOMPANIED ALIEN 
              CHILDREN.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services shall provide to the Secretary 
of Homeland Security information relating to the sponsor, potential 
sponsor, and each member of the household of the sponsor or potential 
sponsor, of an unaccompanied alien child (as defined in section 462(g) 
of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 279(g)).
    (b) Use of Information.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, the Secretary of Homeland Security may use the information 
provided under subsection (a) to place in detention, remove, or refer 
for a decision whether to initiate removal proceedings or initiate 
removal proceedings against, the sponsor, potential sponsor, or any 
member of the household of the sponsor or potential sponsor, of an 
unaccompanied alien child.
    (c) Authority To Investigate.--Notwithstanding any other provision 
of law, Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies may 
investigate any suspected violation of law by a sponsor, potential 
sponsor, or a member of the household of a sponsor or potential 
sponsor, of an unaccompanied alien child.
                                 <all>
```
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 53-3 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 53-3 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 2 of 2
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

OP 23-0112 

JOHN BRYCE NEWKIRK, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

JAMES SALMONSEN, Warden, 

Montana State Prison, 

MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, 

Respondents. 

FILED 

FEB 11 2023 

BOVVe fl ,a.rivvr,•CCi 

ClerX of Supreme Court 

Stata of Montana 

ORDER 

John Bryce Newkirk, via counsel, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 

asserting that he is entitled to a hearing on medical parole by the Montana Board of Pardons 

and Parole (Board) pursuant to § 46-23-210, MCA. Newkirk has also filed supplemental 

documents, including a District Court Order Denying Motion for Order Approving 

Defendant for Medical Parole, the Board's letter denying him a hearing, and medical 

records. Upon review of his Petition and attachments, we deem it appropriate to require a 

response. Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that that the Attorney General or counsel for the Department of 

Correction is GRANTED thirty days from the date of this Order in which to prepare, file, 

and serve a written response to the petition for a writ of habeas corpus together with 

appropriate documentary exhibits. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to all counsel of record. 

DATED this /707 day of February, 2023. 

Justice 

02/17/2023

Case Number: OP 23-0112
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                   18 U.S.C. SS 1350,
                                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of The X-Change  Corporation  on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2002,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, K. Richard B. Niehoff,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/ Richard B. Niehoff
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
K. Richard B. Niehoff
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
EXHIBIT 31B**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Michael J. Rockenbach, certify that:     1.      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Emulex Corporation;     2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.     4.      The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13-a-15(f) (15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared; b) designed such internal control over financial reporting,or cause such internal control over financial reporting to be designed underour supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliabilityof financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples; c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     5.      The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date: September 15, 2005/s/ Michael J. Rockenbach
**Exhibit23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements of Supreme Industries, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos.333-118584, 333-104386 and 333-89867) and in the related Prospectus of ourreport dated January 27, 2006 on our audits of the consolidated financialstatements and financial statement schedule of Supreme Industries, Inc. and itssubsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and December 25, 2004 and for each of thethree years in the period ended December 31, 2005, which report is included inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 
|                | /s/Crowe Chizek and Company LLC |   |
|---------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                |                            |
|                |                            |
| South Bend, Indiana |                            |
| March 30, 2006      |                            |

 

----
#### STATE v. WILLIE LEE HOPKINS.

(Filed 23 March, 1966.)

Appeal by defendant from *Campbell, J.,*October 4, 1965 Criminal Session, Meciclenbubg Superior Court.

In this criminal prosecution the defendant was tried for the felony of armed robbery . and the forcible taking of $900.00 from the cash drawer of Morris E. Trotter & Son Realty Company, a sole proprietorship owned by James E. Trotter. The robbery was effected by the use of a pistol and by threatening and endangering the life of Joseph W. Terrell, the employee in charge.

The defendant, through counsel, moved to quash the indictment. He excepted to -the court’s order overruling the motion and entered a plea of not guilty.

The State offered evidence that the defendant and three others entered the Realty Company’s place of business described in the indictment. One of the party, in the presence of all, announced, "This is a robbery,” and at the point of a pistol compelled Terrell and Mr. Blackwell, also present, to lie upon the floor while the four ransacked the establishment and took approximately $900.00 from the cash drawer. The witness Terrell positively identified the defendant as being present and participating in the robbery. Mr. Blackwell, the other witness present, was not able to identify any of the parties.

•The defendant testified he was in Washington at the time of the robbery and knew nothing about it. He offered the evidence of Freddie Lee Norman, James Jacob Clinton, and Howard Grier, all of whom testified they participated in the robbery, had been tried, and were now serving time for the offense. Each stated the defendant was not present. Some of their statements to the officers tended *761to show each had made a statement implicating Willie Lee Hopkins or Bill Hopkins, or Hawkins. There was evidence tending to support the defendant’s contention that he was in Washington at the time of the holdup and other evidence tending to show that he was in Charlotte, where it occurred. From the verdict of guilty and judgment thereon, the defendant appealed.

*T. W. Bruton, Attorney General, Millard B. Rich, Jr., Assistant Attorney General for the State.*

*Lila Bellar for defendant appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The defendant finds fault with the jocularity on the part of the court during the preliminary proceedings before the selection of the jury. The lighter vein in which the court expressed its rulings on the preliminary motions is not shown to be prejudicial. The offense of robbery with firearms is properly alleged. The State’s evidence is positive in the identification of the defendant as one of the participants. The defendant and the three who are serving time for having taken part in the robbery testified the defendant was not a participant. The conflict in the evidence with respect to the presence and participation of the defendant presented a question for the jury. Under proper instructions from the court the jury found the defendant guilty.

No error.

Moore, J., not sitting.
#### STATE v. POTTER

No. 140 PC.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 292.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 5 February 1974.
Case 7:07-cv-03324-SCR Document 12 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 1 of 13
Case 7:07-cv-03324-SCR Document 12 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 2 of 13
Case 7:07-cv-03324-SCR Document 12 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 3 of 13
Case 7:07-cv-03324-SCR Document 12 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 4 of 13
Case 7:07-cv-03324-SCR Document 12 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 5 of 13
Case 7:07-cv-03324-SCR Document 12 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 6 of 13
Case 7:07-cv-03324-SCR Document 12 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 7 of 13
Case 7:07-cv-03324-SCR Document 12 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 8 of 13
Case 7:07-cv-03324-SCR Document 12 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 9 of 13
Case 7:07-cv-03324-SCR Document 12 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 10 of 13
Case 7:07-cv-03324-SCR Document 12 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 11 of 13
Case 7:07-cv-03324-SCR Document 12 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 12 of 13
Case 7:07-cv-03324-SCR Document 12 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 13 of 13
NO. 24997

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

IN RE: CLINTON ANDREW ENGLEHART (Deceased, Bar No. 2462)

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the March 2, 2021 motion, filed

by Bradley Tamm as Trustee Administrator at the Office of

Disciplinary Counsel (ODC), pursuant to Rule 2.20 of the Rules of

the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (2021), to securely

destroy the remaining, unclaimed original documents culled from

the files of the practice of deceased attorney Clinton Andrew

Englehart, and upon a review of the record in this matter, we

conclude that, in light of the passage of time, the previous

efforts to contact former clients, and the age of the documents

in question, granting the motion is warranted. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted. Tamm

may, at his discretion, proceed with the secure destruction of

the remaining client documents in this trusteeship.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 18, 2021.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

24997

18-MAR-2021

08:46 AM

Dkt. 11 ORD
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 53-6 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 53-6 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 2 of 2