alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1436 

To make technical corrections to the computation of average pay under 

Public Law 110–279. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 13, 2019 

Mr. SCHUMER (for Mr. BROWN (for himself, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, and Mr. 

BLUNT)) introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, 

read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To make technical corrections to the computation of average 

pay under Public Law 110–279. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO COMPUTATION 

4 OF AVERAGE PAY UNDER PUBLIC LAW 110– 

5 279. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1(c)(2)(A) of Public Law 

7 110–279 (2 U.S.C. 2051(c)(2)(A)) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘For purposes of’’ and all that 

9 follows through ‘‘(i) any period’’ and inserting the 

10 following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1436 CPS

1 ‘‘(i) TREATMENT OF SERVICE.—For 

2 purposes of chapters 83, 84, and 87 of 

3 title 5, United States Code, any period’’; 

4 (2) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and insert5 ing a period; and 

6 (3) in clause (ii)— 

7 (A) by inserting ‘‘TREATMENT OF PAY.— 

8 For purposes of chapter 87 of title 5, United 

9 States Code,’’ before ‘‘the rate of basic pay’’; 

10 and 

11 (B) by striking ‘‘the covered’’ and insert12 ing ‘‘a covered’’. 

13 (b) REGULATIONS.— 

14 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the Office of 

15 Personnel Management shall promulgate regulations 

16 to carry out this section. 

17 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The regulations pro18 mulgated under paragraph (1) shall take effect not 

19 later than 180 days after the date of enactment of 

20 this Act. 

21 (c) APPLICABILITY OF AMENDMENTS.— 

22 (1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection, the 

23 terms ‘‘contractor’’, ‘‘covered individual’’, and ‘‘food 

24 services contract’’ have the meanings given those 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 1436 CPS

1 terms in section 1(a) of Public Law 110–279 (2 

2 U.S.C. 2051(a)). 

3 (2) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made 

4 by this section shall apply with respect to— 

5 (A) a covered individual who separates 

6 from service as an employee of a contractor per7 forming services under the food services con8 tract before, on, or after the date of enactment 

9 of this Act; and 

10 (B) each payment to a covered individual 

11 under chapter 83 or 84 of title 5, United States 

12 Code, made on or after the effective date of the 

13 regulations promulgated under subsection (b). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 12.2

# KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT
COMPANY

# COMPUTATION OF RATIO
OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

|                                    |      |      |      |         |     
|----------------------------------- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ------- | ----
|September 30                       
|2003                                | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999    | 1998
|
|(Thousands)                        
|Income from continuing operations   |      |      |      |         |     
|before cumulative effect of changes |      |     
|in accounting principle             |      |      | $    | 113,556 |     
|Add:                                |      |     
|Equity investment (income) loss     |      |      |      | -       |     
|Minority interests in subsidiaries  |      |      |      | -       |     
|
|Income subtotal                     |      |      |      | 113,556 |     
|
|                                    |      |     
|Add:                                |      |     
|Taxes on income                     |      |      |      | 75,598  |     
|Kansas City earnings tax            |      |      |      | 789     |     
|
|Total taxes on income               |      |      |      | 76,387  |     
|
|                                    |      |     
|Interest on value of leased         |      |     
|property                            |      |      |      | 4,807   |     
|Interest on long-term debt          |      |      |      | 41,197  |     
|Interest on short-term debt         |      |      |      | 399     |     
|Mandatorily redeemable Preferred    |      |     
|Securities                          |      |      |      | 9,337   |     
|Other interest expense              |      |     
|and amortization                    |      |      |      | 3,032   |     
|
|Total fixed charges                 |      |      |      | 58,772  |     
|
|                                    |      |     
|Earnings before taxes on            |      |     
|income and fixed charges            |      |      |      | 248,715 |     
|
|                                    |      |     
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges  |      |      |      | 4.23    |     
|
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Soldier Accounted For From Korean War (Marquez, J.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Case 1:06-cv-15011-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6794
OORELL SHARRIEFF, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusCAPTAIN PARKER, Unknown; EARL P. HICKS; LIEUTENANT AKERS, Unknown; LIEUTENANT HARRISTON, Unknown; SERGEANT IRVING, Unknown; T. JONES,Correctional Officer; DARIN CUNNINGHAM, Correctional Officer; BOONE, Correctional Officer, Unknown; R. SKYES, Correctional Officer; HUNTER, Correctional Officer, Unknown, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-94-105) Submitted: November 21, 1995 Decided: January 4, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Oorell Sharrieff, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (1988). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order entering judgment on the jury's verdict finding in favor of Appellees. * We have reviewed the record before us and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the magistrate judge's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
================================================================================

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


               Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
       Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BSD Medical Corporation
(the "Company") for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hyrum
A. Mead, President (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



Date:    November 14, 2007

By:      /s/ Hyrum A. Mead
         ------------------
         Hyrum A. Mead
         President
         (Principal Executive Officer)








--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EX-10.40





 Exhibit 10.40 

THE FRESH MARKET HOLDINGS, INC. 

c/o Apollo Management VIII, L.P. 

9 West 57th Street 
 New
York, NY 10019 
 January 20, 2022 
 Kevin Miller

 Chief Marketing Officer 
 Re: Stock Option 

Dear Kevin: 
 We are pleased to inform you that we have made
certain favorable changes to the stock option that was previously granted to you pursuant to the Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) of The Fresh Market Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”). Specifically, your option to
purchase 300,000 shares that was granted on July 7, 2020 (“Option”) has been modified as follows: 
 (i) Effective
upon an IPO (as defined in the Plan) and provided you remain employed through the date of the IPO, your Option will vest as to 5% of the portion thereof that is unvested at the time of the IPO; and 

(ii) Effective upon an IPO, a number of shares equal to the shares underlying the portion of the Option that vests pursuant to the preceding
clause will be released from the transfer restrictions imposed by Section 9(a) of the Option Plan, provided that the foregoing will not be construed as releasing any shares that are non-transferable by
reason of a standstill agreement or related agreement entered into at the request of the managing underwriters of the IPO. 
 For the avoidance of doubt,
the shares released from the transfer restrictions will be treated as having been released pursuant to Section 5 of your option grant letter, and therefore will reduce the number of shares that may subsequently be released upon an Investor Sale
(as defined in such Section 5). 
 Except for these changes, your Option will remain in effect in accordance with its terms. 

Sincerely, 
 THE FRESH MARKET HOLDINGS, INC. 

 
 



 
 Jason Potter, CEO
# Airman Lost In 1942 Crash Is Identified (Mustonen)

/ Published March 9, 2006

The Department of Defense POW/Missing Personnel Office (DPMO) announced today that theremains of a U.S. Army Air Forces airman, missing since 1942, have been identified and will soon bereturned to his family for burial.

He is Aviation Cadet Leo Mustonen, 22, of Brainard, Minn. The family has not set a date forhis burial.

Mustonen was one of four men aboard a routine navigation training flight which departedMather Field, Calif., on November 18, 1942. Their AT-7 Navigator aircraft carried about five hours offuel, and when the plane did not return to base, a search was initiated. It was suspended about a monthlater with no results.

In 1947, several hikers on Darwin Glacier in the Sierra Nevada mountain range discovered theaircraft wreckage. Human remains of three of the crew found at the site were buried in the GoldenGate National Cemetery in San Bruno, Calif.

Several other hikers on Mendel Glacier (adjacent to Darwin Glacier) discovered frozen humanremains, circumstantial evidence and personal effects in October 2005. Park rangers from Sequoia andKings Canyon National Parks and a forensic anthropologist from the Joint POW/MIA AccountingCommand (JPAC) recovered the remains, which were later shipped to the JPAC laboratory in Hawaii.

Scientists from JPAC and the Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory (AFDIL) also usedmitochondrial DNA as one of the forensic tools in the process. U.S. Army Casualty and Mortuaryofficials located and briefed representatives of the families of all four crewmen.

For additional information on the Defense Department’s mission to account for missingAmericans, visit the DPMO web site at http://www.dtic.mil/dpmo or call (703) 699-1169.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1545 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs permits the display of Battlefield Crosses in national cemeteries, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 20, 2019 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure the Secretary of Veterans Affairs permits the display of Battlefield Crosses in national cemeteries, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fallen Warrior Battle5 field Cross Memorial Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1545 IS

1 SEC. 2. DISPLAY OF BATTLEFIELD CROSSES IN NATIONAL 

2 CEMETERIES. 

3 Section 2403 of title 38, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following new sub5 section: 

6 ‘‘(d)(1) The Secretary may not prohibit the display 

7 of a Battlefield Cross in any national cemetery. 

8 ‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘Battlefield Cross’ 

9 means a memorial monument in honor of fallen members 

10 of the Armed Forces that may include a replica of an in11 verted rifle, boots, helmets, and identification tag.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1410 

To amend the Federal share of the fishing safety standards grants. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2019 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. KING, Ms. 

COLLINS, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Ms. WARREN, Ms. HASSAN, and Mr. REED) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal share of the fishing safety standards 

grants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Funding Instruction 

5 for Safety, Health, and Security Avoids Fishing Emer6 gencies Act’’ or the ‘‘FISH SAFE Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF FEDERAL SHARE OF THE FISHING 

8 SAFETY STANDARDS GRANTS. 

9 (a) AMENDMENT.—Section 4502 of title 46, United 

10 States Code, is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1410 IS

1 (1) in subsection (i)(3), by striking ‘‘50’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘75’’; and 

3 (2) in subsection (j)(3), by striking ‘‘50’’ and 

4 inserting ‘‘75’’. 

5 (b) RETROACTIVE EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amend6 ment made by subsection (a) takes effect on the day after 

7 the date of enactment of the Frank LoBiondo Coast 

8 Guard Authorization Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–282). 

9 SEC. 3. REIMBURSEMENT. 

10 Amounts appropriated to carry out section 4502 of 

11 title 46, United States Code, under the Consolidated Ap12 propriations Act, 2017 (Public Law 115–31), shall be 

13 available until not later than September 30, 2020, in order 

14 for the Secretary of Health and Human Services to pro15 vide a reimbursement or supplement to a recipient of a 

16 grant under the Fishing Safety Training Grants Program 

17 under section 4502(i) of title 46, United States Code, or 

18 the Fishing Safety Research Grant Program under section 

19 4502(j) of title 46, United States Code, in an amount that 

20 is equal to, for any non-Federal share provided by such 

21 grant recipient under such Program that is more than 25 

22 percent, the amount of such excess non-Federal share ex23 pended or included in the approved budget by such grant 

24 recipient. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 1410 IS

1 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS AMEND2 MENTS. 

3 Section 4502 of title 46, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (i)(4), by striking ‘‘2019’’ and 

6 inserting ‘‘2021’’; and 

7 (2) in subsection (j)(4), by striking ‘‘2019’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘2021’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Paul Burgess, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  annual  report  on Form  10-KSB of  Science  Dynamics
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

     (a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that material  information  relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others,  particularly  during the period in which this  report is
being prepared;

     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business  issuer's  disclosure
controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  disclosed  in this  report any change in the small  business  issuer's
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of
the small  business  issuer's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the
equivalent functions);

     (a) all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.

March 31, 2005

 /s/ Paul Burgess
-----------------
Paul Burgess
Chief Executive Officer
#### Bill Max OVERTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 05-1207.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 31, 2005.

Before MAYER, RADER, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

We consider whether this appeal should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Bill Max Overton sued the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the United States Tax Court. Overton filed a motion for a jury trial. The Tax Court denied the motion and Overton filed a notice of appeal, seeking review of the Tax Court’s order in this court.

We have no jurisdiction to review cases filed in the Tax Court. 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1) (“The United States Courts of Appeals (other than the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) shall have exclusive jurisdiction to review the decisions of the Tax Court....”). Additionally, it is not appropriate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631 to transfer this case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which might otherwise have jurisdiction over an appeal from a final *1005decision in this matter. Overton seeks review of an interlocutory order of the Tax Court that was not certified for permissive appeal. See 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(2) (Tax Court may certify an interlocutory order for permissive review).

Thus, because the Fifth Circuit would not have appellate jurisdiction over an appeal of the interlocutory order, transfer of this appeal is not appropriate. 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (“Whenever a civil action ... or an appeal ... is noticed for or filed with such a court and that court finds that there is a want of jurisdiction, the court shall, if it is in the interest of justice, transfer such action or appeal to any other court in which the action or appeal could have been brought at the time it was filed or noticed. .. .”)•

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.