70612 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 224 / Tuesday, November 22, 2005 / Notices 

excluding the last three digits, in the 

docket number field to access the 

document. For assistance, please contact 

FERC, Online Support at 

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll 

free at (866) 208–3676, or for TTY, 

contact (202) 502–8659. 

Docket No. Date received Presenter or requester 

Prohibited: 

1. Project No. 382–000 ........................................................ 11–7–05 Amy L. Fesnock. 

2. Project Nos. 2539–000 and 12522–000 ......................... 10–31–05 Jude Pinelski 1.

Exempt: 

1. CP05–92–000 .................................................................. 11–3–05 Hon. Ron LeLeux. 

2. Project No. 2216–000 ...................................................... 11–2–05 Hon. Brian Higgins. 

3. Project Nos. 2602–000 and 2692–000 ........................... 10–28–05 Hon. Charles H. Taylor. 

4. Project No. 10395–000 .................................................... 11–2–05 Hon. Geoff Davis. 

1One of nineteen postcard ‘‘form’’ submittals in Docket Nos. P–2539–000 and P–12522–000 filed between 10/31/05 and 11/7/05. 

Magalie R. Salas, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E5–6418 Filed 11–21–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[IN 165–1; FRL–7999–6] 

Adequacy Status of Vigo County, IN, 8- 

Hour Ozone Redesignation and 

Maintenance Plan for Transportation 

Conformity Purposes 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of adequacy. 

SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is 

notifying the public that EPA has found 

that the motor vehicle emissions 

budgets in the Vigo County, Indiana 8- 

hour ozone redesignation request and 

maintenance plan are adequate for 

conformity purposes. On March 2, 1999, 

the DC Circuit Court ruled that 

submitted State Implementation Plans 

(SIPs) cannot be used for conformity 

determinations until EPA has 

affirmatively found them adequate. As a 

result of our finding, Vigo County can 

use the motor vehicle emissions budgets 

from the submitted 8-hour ozone 

redesignation request and maintenance 

plan for future conformity 

determinations. These budgets are 

effective December 7, 2005. The finding 

and the response to comments will be 

available at EPA’s conformity Web site: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/transp.htm, 

(once there, click on the ‘‘Conformity’’

button, then look for ‘‘Adequacy Review 

of SIP Submissions for Conformity’’). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Steven Rosenthal, Environmental 

Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section 

(AR–18J), Air Programs Branch, Air and 

Radiation Division, United States 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6052, 

rosenthal.steven@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. 

Background 

Today’s notice is simply an 

announcement of a finding that we have 

already made. EPA Region 5 sent a letter 

to the Indiana Department of 

Environmental Management on October 

25, 2005, stating that the motor vehicle 

emissions budgets for the year 2015, 

submitted in the Vigo County, Indiana 

8-hour ozone redesignation request and 

maintenance plan, are adequate. This 

finding has been announced on EPA’s 

conformity Web site: http:// 

www.epa.gov/otaq/transp.htm, (once 

there, click on the ‘‘Conformity’’ button, 

then look for ‘‘Adequacy Review of SIP 

Submissions for Conformity’’). 

Transportation conformity is required 

by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act. 

EPA’s conformity rule requires that 

transportation plans, programs, and 

projects conform to state air quality 

implementation plans and establishes 

the criteria and procedures for 

determining whether or not they do. 

Conformity to a SIP means that 

transportation activities will not 

produce new air quality violations, 

worsen existing violations, or delay 

timely attainment of the national 

ambient air quality standards. 

The criteria by which we determine 

whether a SIP’s motor vehicle emission 

budgets are adequate for conformity 

purposes are outlined in 40 CFR 

93.118(e)(4). Please note that an 

adequacy review is separate from EPA’s 

completeness review, and it also should 

not be used to prejudge EPA’s ultimate 

approval of the SIP. Even if we find a 

budget adequate, the SIP could later be 

disapproved. 

We’ve described our process for 

determining the adequacy of submitted 

SIP budgets in guidance (May 14, 1999 

memo titled ‘‘Conformity Guidance on 

Implementation of March 2, 1999 

Conformity Court Decision’’). We 

followed this guidance in making our 

adequacy determination. 

Dated: November 10, 2005. 

Bharat Mathur, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 05–23091 Filed 11–21–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

Change in Bank Control Notices; 

Acquisition of Shares of Bank or Bank 

Holding Companies 

The notificants listed below have 

applied under the Change in Bank 

Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and 

§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 

CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank 

holding company. The factors that are 

considered in acting on the notices are 

set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 

U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for 

immediate inspection at the Federal 

Reserve Bank indicated. The notices 

also will be available for inspection at 

the office of the Board of Governors. 

Interested persons may express their 

views in writing to the Reserve Bank 

indicated for that notice or to the offices 

of the Board of Governors. Comments 

must be received not later than 

December 6, 2005. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of 

Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 

Community Affairs Officer) 90 

Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, 

Minnesota 55480-0291: 

1. Paul J. Hanisch, Crosby, North 

Dakota; to acquire voting shares of 

Hanisch Bankshares, Ltd., Crosby, North 

Dakota and thereby indirectly acquire