alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



SUBSIDIARIES OF
CITIZENS REPUBLIC BANCORP, INC.
 Jurisdiction orOwnership
    
    Incorporation ofSubsidiaries
    
    Percentage
    
    OrganizationCitizens Bank
    
    
    100
    %
    
    MichiganCB Financial Services, Inc.
    
    
    100
    %
    
    MichiganCitizens Title Services, Inc.
    
    
    100
    %
    
    MichiganCitizens Bank Mortgage Company, LLC
    
    
    1
    %
    
    MichiganCitizens Service Company, Inc.
    
    
    100
    %
    
    MichiganCitizens Bank Mortgage Company, LLC
    
    
    99
    %
    
    MichiganPulaski Capital Corporation
    
    
    100
    %
    
    NevadaF&M BankIowa
    
    
    100
    %
    
    IowaSecurity Banc Services Group, Inc.
    
    
    100
    %
    
    IowaCitizens Bank Wealth Management, N.A.
    
    
    100
    %
    
    National AssociationCitizens Funding Trust I
    
    
    100
    %
    
    Michigan
 120
#### STATE v. SPRINGS

No. 154 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 61.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 14 July 1977.
#### MANUFACTURING CO. v. MANUFACTURING CO.

No. 10 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 97.

Petition by Powell Manufacturing Co. for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed for limited purpose. Motion of Harrington Manufacturing Co. to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 1 September 1976.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM BAIRNCO'S ANNUAL
REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         660,000                 660,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               30,243,000              30,243,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,136,000               1,136,000
<INVENTORY>                                 25,204,000              25,204,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            63,209,000              63,209,000
<PP&E>                                     101,672,000             101,672,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              61,990,000              61,990,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             119,145,000             119,145,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,953,000              29,953,000
<BONDS>                                     26,591,000              26,591,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       112,000                 112,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,055,000              50,055,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               119,145,000             119,145,000
<SALES>                                     41,436,000             168,881,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            41,436,000             168,881,000
<CGS>                                       28,208,000             113,734,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,208,000             113,734,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             506,000               2,104,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,051,000              12,898,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,007,000               4,257,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,044,000               8,641,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,044,000               8,641,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.26                    1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26                    1.08


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



KREISLER MANUFACTURING CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kreisler Manufacturing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Stern, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 10, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael D. Stern   
|                   |  |  |  | Michael D. Stern       
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer





18
EXHIBIT 99.1





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Bairnco Corporation:



We have audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) the consolidated financial statements of Bairnco Corporation and subsidiaries referred to in our report dated January 26, 2006, which is included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.  Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole.  The Schedule II is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements.  This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.





/s/ Grant Thornton LLP





Orlando, Florida

January 26, 2006
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
HEI, Inc.:

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-386338, 33-395529, 33-395551, 33-349489, 33-370426, 33-340026,
33-33322, 33-46928, 33-46929) on Form S-8 of HEI, Inc. of our reports dated
October 3, 2002, except as to notes 1, 2, 6 and 7 which are as of
December 13, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of HEI, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of August 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended August 31, 2002 and the related
financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the August 31, 2002 annual
report on Form 10-K/A of HEI, Inc.


                                        /s/ KPMG LLP



Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 7, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1504 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1504

    To amend section 3606 of title 18, United States Code, to grant 
   probation officers authority to arrest hostile third parties who 
 obstruct or impede a probation officer in the performance of official 
                                duties.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2019

  Mr. Tillis introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend section 3606 of title 18, United States Code, to grant 
   probation officers authority to arrest hostile third parties who 
 obstruct or impede a probation officer in the performance of official 
                                duties.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Probation Officer Protection Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF PROBATION OFFICERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 3606 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in the heading, by striking ``and return of a 
        probationer'' and by inserting ``authority of probation 
        officers'';
            (2) by striking ``If there'' and inserting ``(a) If 
        there''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) A probation officer, while in the performance of his or her 
official duties, may arrest a person without a warrant if there is 
probable cause to believe that the person has forcibly assaulted, 
resisted, opposed, impeded, intimidated, or interfered with the 
probation officer, or a fellow probation officer, in violation of 
section 111. The arrest authority described in this subsection shall be 
exercised under such rules and regulations as the Director of the 
Administrative Office of the United States Courts shall prescribe.''.
    (b) Table of Sections.--The table of sections for subchapter A of 
chapter 229 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking the 
item relating to section 3606 and inserting the following:

``3606. Arrest authority of probation officers.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE v. DAUGHTRY

No. 89 PC.

Case below: 8 N.C. App. 318.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 14 July 1970.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Christina W. HaganChristina W. HaganExecutive Vice President, Secretary
and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


        We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-17806, 33-39627, 33-46687, 33-81986, 33-60947,
333-08597, 333-59509, 333-83563 and 333-95589) of Xicor, Inc. of our report
dated January 24, 2000, relating to the financial statements, which appears in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
San Jose, California
March 10, 2000
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of ASM International N.V. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Charles D. del Prado, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Arnold J.M. van der Ven, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                            
|--- |  | ---------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ CHARLES D. DEL PRADO   
|    |  | Charles D. del Prado       
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer    
|    |  | April 1, 2008              
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ ARNOLD J.M. VAN DER VEN
|    |  | Arnold J.M. van der Ven    
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer    
|    |  | April 1, 2008              



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Unassociated Document








EXHIBIT 10.1









CREDIT LINE AGREEMENT

 

 

This Credit Line Agreement is entered into between Omega Financial, Inc., hereafter, “Lender” and Ascot Funding, Inc., hereafter, “borrower” and is as follows.

 


 


	1.	Purpose.  The purpose of this agreement is to provide a credit line that may be drawn on by borrower for its financial needs for the term of this agreement. Lender is willing to extend credit pursuant to the terms of this agreement.
	 	 
	2.	Amount of Line.  Lender agrees to provide credit up to the amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) for the term of this agreement. Said credit shall be provided by direct payment of expenses, cash advances, guarantees of borrowings or any combination of said methods. Credit shall be provided within 24 hours of the same being requested by the
borrower.
	 	 
	3.	Terms of Repayment.  All amounts advanced or guaranteed under the agreement shall bear interest at the rate of four percent (4%) per annum from the date paid or advanced to the date or repayment or end of this agreement whichever comes first. Interest shall be accrued. Borrower may pay all or a portion of the borrowed amounts, from time to time, in its discretion. Payments shall first be applied towards any accrued interest
and then principal. All amounts that have been paid or guaranteed are due on a date that is 36 months from the date of signing of this agreement. At that time all sums that remain unpaid will be due including any accrued interest. If any sums due are not paid within 10 days after a date that is 36 months from the date of signing this agreement and the borrower will be in default as a result of the non-payment.
	 	 
	4.	Entire Agreement.  The parties warrant and acknowledge that they have read and understand the terms of this agreement. The parties have had an opportunity to consult with their own independent legal advisors concerning the agreement. Neither party has relied on the other party for any representation or legal advice concerning this agreement. This agreement represents the entire agreement and there are no oral understandings
or other side agreements that vary the terms of the agreement. The parties warrant that they have received the necessary corporate approvals to enter into this agreement and proceed therewith.
	 	 
	5.	Amendment.  This agreement may only be changed by a writing signed by both parties. If any litigation arises over this agreement the losing party agrees to pay the prevailing party his costs and attorney fees in a reasonable amount. This agreement shall be construed according to California law. Venue for any action regarding this agreement shall in be Los Angeles County, California.



 


 

Dated: August 16, 2008

  


	
  
	
/s/ Nancy Israel
	 	
/s/ Patrick C. Brooks

	  	
Omega Financial, Inc.
	 	
Ascot Funding, Inc.

	  	
(“the Lender”)
	 	
(“the Borrower”)
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 223 (Monday, November 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70058-70059]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23009]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket 49-2005]


Foreign-Trade Zone 22 -- Chicago, Illinois, Area, Application for 
Expansion, Correction

    The Federal Register notice (70 FR 61429-61430, 10/24/05) 
describing the request submitted by the Illinois International Port 
District, grantee of FTZ 22, requesting authority to expand its zone in 
the Chicago area, is corrected as follows:
    Paragraph 8 should read ``A copy of the application and 
accompanying exhibits will be available during this

[[Page 70059]]

time for public inspection at the address Number 1 listed above, and at 
the U.S. Department of Commerce Export Assistance Center, 200 W. Adams 
Street, Suite 2450, Chicago, IL 60606.''

    Dated: November 14, 2005.
Dennis Puccinelli,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-23009 Filed 11-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 11 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 11 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03369-AJP Document 11 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-5 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-5 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-5 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-5 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-5 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 5 of 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM OCEAN
BIO-CHEM, INC. FORM 1O-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                             123,515
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,440,827
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (23,000)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,506,987
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,498,870
<PP&E>                                           7,068,418
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,464,860)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,410,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,845,527
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            41,060
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,631,232
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,410,264
<SALES>                                         16,139,256
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,153,601
<CGS>                                           11,852,435
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,112,107
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 573,882
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (384,823)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (140,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (244,823)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (244,823)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.06)



</TABLE>
#### HENRY MOSER, PROSECUTOR, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE TOWN OF NORTH BERGEN ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Argued October 6, 1931

Decided March 2, 1932.

Before Justices Trenchard, Daly and Donges.

For the prosecutor, *William George.*

For the defendants, *William JE. Sewell (Nicholas S. .Schloeder,*of counsel).

*316Per Curiam.

This writ brings up the action of the board of commissioners of North Bergen and the director of public safety in abolishing prosecutor’s office of lieutenant of the police force and reducing him to the rank of sergeant.

The case is closely related to those of Abraham Spears et al. and Herbert Beck et al. *v.*Town of North Bergen, Nos-210 and 211 of the October term, 1931. On December 31st,. 1930, at the sarnie time the ordinances enlarging the police force were passed, an ordinance was adopted increasing the-number of lieutenants from three to five, and prosecutor was-appointed to one of the new positions, having theretofore-been a sergeant. When the board of commissioners in June, 1931, reduced the force to its previous strength, it also-abolished the two offices of lieutenant created on December 31st, 1930. On June 16th, 1931, the director of public-safety appointed the prosecutor to the office of sergeant.

Prosecutor is an exempt fireman and claims he could not-be reduced in rank except upon a hearing after charges. It has repeatedly been held that the governing body of a municipality, acting in good faith, and in the public interest,, has the power to abolish an office or position. *Paddock*v. *Hudson Tax*Board, 82 *N. J. L.*360; *Harker*v. *Bayonne,*85 *Id.*176; *Colgarry*v. *Water*Commissioners, *Ibid.*583; *Buckley*v. *Guttenberg,*87 *Id.*434.

The purpose of the change here was clearly shown to be economy. When the force was substantially reduced, the-need of five lieutenants naturalty ceased. Prosecutor fails-to show that the action taken with respect to his position was not in good faith. In fact the contrary clearly appears.

The action of the board of commissioners is affirmed, andi the writ dismissed, with costs.
#### STATE v. ALLEN

No. 98 PC.

Case below: 35 N.C. App. 577.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 May 1978.