alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.05 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 14 Filed 11/30/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 14 Filed 11/30/2007 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Riggs National Corporation
(the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert
L. Allbritton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

By: /S/ ROBERT L. ALLBRITTON
Name: Robert L. Allbritton
Chief Executive Officer
March 11, 2004
#### WATCH CO. v. BRAND DISTRIBUTORS and WATCH CO. v. MOTOR MARKET

No. 67.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 648.

Motion of plaintiff to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 26 March 1974.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5664 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5664

 To amend title I of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to 
permit certain individuals losing their COBRA continuation coverage to 
have access to the high-risk health insurance pool program established 
                           under such title.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 2010

  Mr. Ellsworth (for himself and Mr. Doyle) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title I of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to 
permit certain individuals losing their COBRA continuation coverage to 
have access to the high-risk health insurance pool program established 
                           under such title.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``High-Risk Pool Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANDING ACCESS TO HIGH-RISK HEALTH INSURANCE POOL PROGRAM TO 
              CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS LOSING THEIR COBRA CONTINUATION 
              COVERAGE.

    Section 1101(d)(2) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
Act (Public Law 111-148) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(2) has'' and inserting ``(2)(A) has'';
            (2) by striking at the end of subparagraph (A), as 
        designated by paragraph (1) of this section, ``and'' and 
        inserting ``or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
            ``(B) is a qualified beneficiary for purposes of COBRA 
        continuation coverage (as defined in subparagraph (B) of 
        section 3001(a)(10)(B) of division B of the American Recovery 
        and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-5)) who has 
        elected such coverage and with respect to whom the date of the 
        expiration of the maximum period of such coverage required 
        under the applicable COBRA continuation coverage provision (as 
        defined in subparagraph (C) of such section)--
                    ``(i) occurred during the 6-month period prior to 
                the date on which such individual is applying for 
                coverage through the high risk pool; or
                    ``(ii) will occur during the 30-day period 
                following the date described in clause (i); and''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of section 371(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the lessee(s), Culbertson Management Trust, Dan W. Irwin, and Kathleen Irwin Schuster, timely filed a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease NMNM 13277 in Lea County, NM. The lessees paid the required rental accruing from the date of termination, June 1, 2002. 

                        No leases were issued that affect these lands. The lessee agrees to the new lease terms for rentals and royalties of ($25 per acre) and 24                        2/3                         percent rate. The lessees paid the $500 administration fee for the reinstatement of the lease and $158 cost for publishing this Notice.                     

The lessees met the requirements for reinstatement of the lease per Sec. 31(e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188(e)). We are proposing to reinstate the lease, effective the date of termination subject to: 
      - The original terms and conditions of the lease;
      - The increased rental of ($25) per acre;
      - The increased royalty of 242/3                         percent or 4 percentages above the existing competitive royalty rate; and                     
      - The $158 cost of publishing this Notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gloria Baca, BLM, New Mexico State Office, (505) 438-7566. 

Dated: November 4, 2005. 

Gloria Baca, 

Land Law Examiner. 

[FR Doc. 05-22978 Filed 11-18-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P
Unassociated Document










 

SECOND MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT

 

 


WHEREAS, OxySure Systems, Inc. ("OxySure") and Scott T. Freeman ("Freeman") (OxySure and Freeman jointly, the "Parties") entered into that certain Employment Agreement ("Agreement") dated September 6, 2006, and as first amended on August 30, 2008; and

 

WHEREAS, The Parties have agreed that it is in their best interests to modify the terms of the Agreement.

 

NOW, WHEREFORE, FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, THE SUFFICIENCY OF WHICH IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

 

Exhibit A, Section 2(a) - "Base Salary" shall be amended, and Exhibit A, Section 2(a) shall read as follows:

 

(2) Salary, Bonus and Benefits

 

(a) Base Salary: For the period commencing January 15,2009 through July 15,2009: (a) The monthly base salary shall be $3,000 per month subject to $9,000 in monthly sales margin contribution, (b) OxySure shall pay Freeman's medical insurance benefits; (c) OxySure shall issue Freeman stock options totaling 6,167 options per month, "and the stock
options shall have an exercise price of $.82 per share, (d) OxySure shall pay Freeman commissions on product sales, generated by him in accordance with the following:

 


	
■  
	
On the first $9,000 of monthly margin contribution, commission is 0%. The monthly margin contribution requirement is cumulative, starting on January 15, 2009.




 


	
■  
	
For every dollar above $9,000 of monthly margin contribution, the commission rate is 50% of the margin contribution. If a sales transaction is shared with the Company or another sales person, then the commission rate after first $9,000 in monthly margin contribution is 25% of the margin contribution. Payment of commissions is based on funds received.




 


	
■  
	
In the case of sales produced by distributors introduced and managed by Freeman, only the first 4 months of sales produced by the distributor is commissionable in accordance with the above.








 

All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.





  



  







  




 

 

 

 

 

Agreed to and accepted: By:.



 



	 	 	 	 	 
	
By:  
	 	 	
By:  
	 
	
Mr. Julian T. Ross, CEO
	 	 	
Mr. Scott T. Freeman, Executive
	 
	
For: OxySure Systems, Inc.
	 	 	
 
	 
	Date: January 15, 2009	 	 	Date: January 15, 2009
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-77,157-01 and WR-77,157-02

EX PARTE DANIEL LEE LOPEZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR POST-CONVICTION WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

AND MOTIONS TO STAY THE EXECUTION IN CAUSE NO. 09-CR-787-B

IN THE 117 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

TH

NUECES COUNTY

Per curiam. ALCALA, J., filed a concurring statement in which JOHNSON, J.,

joins.

O R D E R

This is a subsequent application for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the

provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.071 § 5 and two motions to

stay applicant’s execution.

In March 2010, a jury found applicant guilty of the offense of capital murder. The

jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure
Lopez - 2

Article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set applicant’s punishment at death.

1

This Court affirmed applicant’s conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Lopez v.

State, No. AP-76,327 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 31, 2012)(not designated for publication).

Shortly after he was convicted and sentenced to death, applicant waived the appointment

of counsel to represent him in a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus under Article

11.071, and he expressed his desire to waive habeas review altogether. No writ

application was filed in the convicting court on or before the statutory due date of January

27, 2012. Because no writ application was filed, and because applicant consistently and

repeatedly expressed his desire to waive habeas review, this Court accepted his habeas

waiver and noted in the order issued that the waiver constituted a waiver of all grounds

for relief that were available to him before the last date on which his application could

have been timely filed. Ex parte Lopez, No. WR-77,157-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Apr. 18,

2012)(not designated for publication).

On July 27, 2015, counsel for applicant filed in this Court a suggestion that we

reconsider on our own motion our acceptance of applicant’s waiver of habeas review. In

the suggestion to reconsider, counsel asserts that the Court should reconsider its order

accepting applicant’s waiver of state habeas review because the process by which he was

allowed to waive did not comport with the dictates of due process.

On July 28, 2015, counsel filed in the trial court a subsequent application for a writ

 Unless otherwise indicated all references to Articles refer to the Code of Criminal 1

Procedure.
Lopez - 3

of habeas corpus. In the subsequent application, counsel asserts that applicant is actually

innocent of the crime for which he was convicted.

After reviewing applicant’s subsequent application, we find that he has failed to

satisfy the requirements of Article 11.071 § 5. Accordingly, the application is dismissed

as an abuse of the writ without reviewing the merits of the claim, and his motion to stay

the execution is denied. Art. 11.071 § 5(c). Further, we decline to reconsider our

determination to accept applicant’s waiver of habeas review, and we deny the motion to

stay filed in conjunction with that pleading.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 4 DAY OF AUGUST, 2015.

th

Do Not Publish
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 29 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 29 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. MARTIN and PADGETT

No. 119 PC.

Case below: 18 N.C. App. 398.

Petition by defendant Padgett for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 August 1973.
**EXHIBIT 23 **

 

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:
| (1)    (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
Form S-8 Registration Statement No.   33-53849Form S-8 Registration Statement No.   33-57211Form S-8 Registration Statement No.   33-59621Form S-8 Registration Statement No.  333-79129Form S-8 Registration Statement No.  333-79137Form S-8 Registration Statement No.  333-100923Form S-8 Registration Statement No.  333-115479Form S-8 Registration Statement No.  333-124891

of our reports dated March 13, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Intergraph Corporation and subsidiaries, Intergraph Corporation and subsidiaries management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Intergraph Corporation and subsidiaries, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Birmingham, Alabama March 13, 2006

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Case 7:07-cv-03352-CLB Document 7 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 23

 

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 

 

 

TO BAIRNCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES:

 

 

As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 22, 2002 on the consolidated financial statements of Bairnco Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001, incorporated by reference into the Company's Form 10-K dated March 15, 2002, into the following registration statements previously filed by the Company: Form S-8 (File No. 33-36330); Form S-8 (File No. 33-41313).

 

 

 

 

					ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Orlando, Florida

March 15, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0529

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JASSIE LAYDELL WESTERMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 29, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 17 2023

11/17/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0529
EXHIBIT 21.1


                SUBSIDIARIES OF JACKPOT ENTERPRISES, INC.


<TABLE>
                                                                  
                                                      STATE OF
             COMPANY                  %OWNED       INCORPORATION
<S>                                   <C>          <C>

1.Cardivan Company                     100%            Nevada

2.Corral Coin, Inc.                    100%            Nevada

3.Corral Country Coin, Inc.            100%            Nevada

4.Corral United, Inc.                  100%            Nevada

5.Jackpot Gaming, Inc.                 100%            Nevada

6.Jackpot Owl, Inc.                    100%            Nevada

7.Jackpot's Highway 93 Casino, Inc.    100%            Nevada


</TABLE>
United States District Court

Southern District of New York

Office of the Clerk

U.S. Courthouse

500 Pearl Street, New York, N.Y. 10007-1213

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X

 

 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

United States

V.

07-cr-348

Raveendra Puttaramu

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X 

 

Pursuant to the memorandum of the Case Processing Assistant, the above-entitled action is

reassigned to the calendar of

Judge Patterson

 

All future documents submitted in this action are to be presented in the Clerk’s Office of the

Southern District Court for filing and shall bear the assigned judge’s initials after the case number.

The attorney(s) for the plaintiff(s) are requested to serve a copy of the Notice of

Reassignment on all defendants.

J. Michael McMahon, CLERK

Dated: 5/2/7

By: Lourdes Aquino

 Deputy Clerk 

 

 

cc: Attorneys of Record 

PS REASSIGNMENT FORM 

Data Quality Control Revised: March 9, 2001

Case 1:07-cr-00348-RPP Document 14 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03331-MGC Document 6 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-03331-MGC Document 6 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-03331-MGC Document 6 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-03331-MGC Document 6 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-03331-MGC Document 6 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-03331-MGC Document 6 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-03331-MGC Document 6 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 7 of 7
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 29, 2010 

0125 

Order 

 

January 29, 2010 

139946 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139946 

 COA: 293542 

Kent CC: 04-005169-FC 

JUAN VILLAFANE MARTINEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 5, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case 1:06-cv-15137-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03327-DC Document 23 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03327-DC Document 23 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### CITY OF BREVARD v. RITTER

No. 6 PC.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 380.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 2 April 1974.