alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                       1,000
<CURRENCY>                                           US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                           105,768
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     78,751
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                      297,613
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 738,259
<PP&E>                                         2,440,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,287,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   896,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            807,828
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                      11,129,954
<OTHER-SE>                                   (11,009,545)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     896,998
<SALES>                                        1,294,838
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,294,838
<CGS>                                          1,271,216
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,271,216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 859,077
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (835,455)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (22,472)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (850,976)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (850,976)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (850,976)
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (850,976)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.39)




</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
-0476 IN THE MATTER OF: G.M., Respondent and Appellant. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 24, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 14 2022

07/14/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0476
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No.333-70426, 333- 40026, 333- 104830 333-113419 and 333-115982), and Form S-8 (File No. 333-86338,333-95529, 333-95551, 333-49489, 33-33322, 33-46928 and 33-46929) of HEI, Inc. and subsidiaries ofour report dated November 30, 2007, which appears on page 65 of this annual report on Form 10-K forthe year ended September 1, 2007.                    /s/ VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP         Minneapolis, Minnesota
#### STATE v. WOOTEN

No. 135 PC.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 139.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 February 1974.
Case 1:06-cv-14961-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
**OFFICE** OF THE **ATTORNEY GENERAL**  **OF TEXAS** 

**-. OROVCR**  **SELLERS Nrii#%~**  1946
**.-1** ***Tro ”“** **ri EmmAI.** 

Hon. L. A. wooas stat* Suporlntondont oi Publla fnatruotion Austin, Texas ~e6r or. 

### w00a8:

Tour reoent ooxuouniostioa to th "During the aummor or oi the 1944-45 aohool term of Coleman andR 

### rirty per0entt on8 year only. o a droreaaa In aaoredlted high t befors the beginning to ralaa the tax rate dlet the valuations 19&-45 aotlon. I from your offioe eatablIshIng tha 

### aaaeaaed

valuations **and** Iot In relation to the ultimate alpa as it applies to Art1019 ph 2 oi thr Rural Aid Law."

70~ 00t8i6m08tion, we

### raqueated0rYOW Inrormstlon. This haa beenfurnished by ounty Superintendent 0r Coleman County. I,your Mr. A. B. Martin reeds as follows: "In replying to your roqueat of Maroh4 ror InrormatIon regarding thetaluatlona of the Talpa Sohool Matrlot #O, rlrat I must say that the Telpa DIatrIot is an Iddependent District Instoed 

### oraoonmon. "TheTalpa Board of Trustees, after an eleotion was held and oerrled to raise the rata from $1.00 to $1.50, dismissed their assessor-oollsotor and authorized the oounty

### 450

Eon. L. A. 

### Woods- Paga 2

assessor-oollootor to 

### assessandoollrot Umlr l ohool tax on the basis of oounty +aluatlona and at the #l.50 rat.. Vhr amountof tax ralaod **by** tha prior tax system on the prior valuations amountrd to #11,65~.1?k (lOO$ oollrotIona) Tha &mountot tax to br rollroted this year et the $1.50 rate but with tha rrduoad valuations 

### la#ll,953.65 (100%oollootlona) IOUoan 

### assthat tha rhaagr 

### hasreSultad in a alight lnorraao in the refonue of 

### thisyear otorthatof last year. Tha aohool also saves the rxtra l xprnaa ot the 

### l

aaeaaIng and eollaotlng. “Should you need further Information, I shell be **p*lad**to furnish It.’ The Talpa Independent Sohool Dlatrlot wea originally oreated In 1923 by a spoolal mot, known as E. 8. Mo.‘293, Chapter 13, p. 59, Speolal Laws, 38th Lagialatura, Regular Session. The aeoond aragra h oi Seotlon 2of Art. I oi 5. B. lb7, Chapter 361, 49t.E Lag16 eture P , 1945, Regular Sosalon, oommonlyknown as the ourrent Rural Aid Law, prwldra as follows: 11 *lo aohool dlatrlot will be 

### l llglble fcis aid under tha

. protIaIona of thisAat whloh has raduord Itstax rate wIthIn the two years lnnnedlatrly praredIng the year ior whIoh aid 

### la appllad ror hrroundar oruhloh has rodmod Its tax valuation ln order to ahow budgatary meLa The County Superintendent*8 latter, above quoted, roreala that there vi11 be a slight lnoroaar in rWonuo this year OYarthat of last year. ThIa Inoreaaa (baaedon lOO$oolleotlona) will result from the raise in the tax rata on the roduoad raluatIon8. In view of these raota, It Is the opinion oi this department that tha tax valuation ot sold aohool dlatrlot was not raduord *In order to show budgetary ,nead.*Neither 

### isIts 

### l lIg~bllIty ior 

### l

qtiallzatlon aid aiiaotrd thereby. Very truly yours,

LIIF:V
#### STATE v. McCOY

No. 165 PC.

Case below: 45 N.C. App. 686.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 June 1980. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of significant public interest allowed 3 June 1980.
Case 1:06-cv-15027-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. DOOLEY

No. 127 PC.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 85.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 5 February 1974.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
HEI, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 33-33322, 33-46928 and 33-46929) of our report
dated October 4, 1996, on our audits of the financial statements of HEI, Inc. as
of August 31, 1996 and 1995, and for the years ended August 31, 1996, 1995 and
1994, which report is incorporated by reference in its Annual Report on Form 10-
KSB for the year ended August 31, 1996.



                                                  /S/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

                                                  COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Minneapolis, Minnesota
November 21, 1996
Case 1:06-cv-14972-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
|  Objectives                                     |  Weighting |  Threshold |  Target  |  Superior |
|------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|---------------|----------------|
|  **Core                  Financial Objectives** |
| SE                  Pre-tax Core Earnings            | 50%             |            |          |           |
|  **Key                  Business Objectives**   |
| Expected                  future margin              | 15%             |            |          |           |
| MWh                  under management                | 15%             |            |          |           |
|  **Individual                  Performance**    |
| Individual                  performance              | 20%             | Discretionary   | Discretionary | Discretionary  |

**Note:        Specific information regarding threshold, target and superior measures is        confidential and has been removed.**
EXHIBIT 32.2
 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ Michael J. McCannMichael J. McCannChief Financial Officer
#### HANSEN v. KESSING CO.

No. 23 PC.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 554.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 3 October 1972.
Case 1:06-cv-15023-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15023-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15023-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15023-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15023-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15023-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15023-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15023-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15023-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15023-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15023-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15023-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15023-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application. 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2005-22825.                 

*Date Filed:*                     October 24, 2005.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*                     TC23/TC123 Europe-South West Pacific. Geneva & Teleconference, 15-16 September 2005. (Memo 0099).                 

Intended effective date: 1 December 2005. 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2005-22848.                 

*Date Filed:*                     October 27, 2005.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*                     TC23 Mail Vote 462. Between Europe and South Asian Subcontinent. Geneva & Teleconference, 15-16 September 2005. (Memo 0141).                 

Intended effective date: 1 December 2005. 

Renee V. Wright,

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 05-22354 Filed 11-8-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
#### DELMER TAYLOR v. GREENSBORO NEWS COMPANY

No. 363PA82

(Filed 11 January 1983)

On 21 September 1982 we granted plaintiffs petition for discretionary review, G.S. 7A-31(c), of a decision of the Court of Apeáis, 57 N.C. App. 426, 291 S.E. 2d 852 (1982), affirming summary judgment for defendant entered by *Judge Collier*at the 18 June 1981 Session of Guilford Superior Court, Greensboro Division. We likewise denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs appeal grounded on plaintiffs contention that a substantial constitutional question was involved in the case. G.S. 7A-30G).

*Anne R. Littlejohn for plaintiff appellant.*

*Smith, Moore, Smith, Schell & Hunter by Richard W. Ellis and Alan W. Duncan, for defendant appellee.*

PER CURIAM.

This is an action for libel. Both parties moved for summary judgment in the trial court on stipulated facts. The stipulation is set out in full and verbatim in the Court of Appeals’ opinion. The Court of Appeals decided that the trial court correctly allowed defendant’s motion for summary judgment because on the stipulated facts plaintiff would not be able to show at trial that the allegedly defamatory statement was published with actual malice. After carefully reviewing the record and briefs and hearing oral arguments on the correctness of the Court of Appeals’ decision, we are satisfied that we improvidently granted plaintiffs petition for further review and likewise improvidently denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs appeal. Our orders granting discretionary review and denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal are vacated; and, because we discern no substantial constitutional question in the case, plaintiffs appeal is dismissed.

*460Discretionary review improvidently granted; plaintiffs appeal dismissed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IRCUIT R ULE 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IRCUIT R ULE 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 9, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT )))))))))))))))))))))))))) No. 04-60236 )))))))))))))))))))))))))) AMERICAN GUARANTEE AND LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY Plaintiff – Counter-Defendant – Appellee

vs. AMERISTAR CASINOS INC; ET AL

Defendants AMERISTAR CASINOS INC Defendant – Counter-Claimant – Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

(00-CV-257) Before GARWOOD, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * After hearing oral argument and considering the parties’ briefs and pertinent portions of the record, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of American Guarantee. AFFIRMED.
Case 1:06-cv-15004-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15004-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15004-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15004-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15004-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15004-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15004-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15004-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15004-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15004-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15004-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15004-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15004-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          22,899
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  144,242
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     22,912
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               233,926
<PP&E>                                       1,372,858
<DEPRECIATION>                                 495,585
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,160,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          238,943
<BONDS>                                        319,783
<COMMON>                                       139,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,143
<PREFERRED>                                      7,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     273,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,160,204
<SALES>                                        768,631
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               768,631
<CGS>                                          507,923
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  692,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,646
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,660
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,391
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,269
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,269
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                         SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION - CEO

In connection with the Annual Report of Plains Resources Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John T. Raymond,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.


Dated:  March 28, 2003.


                                                /s/ John T. Raymond
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        John T. Raymond
                                        Chief Executive Officer and President
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 221 (Thursday, November 17, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69763-69764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22783]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS


Updated OGE Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Office of Government Ethics (OGE).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the 
updated OGE Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board.

EFFECTIVE DATE:  November 17, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel D. Dunning, Deputy Director for 
Administration and Information Management, Office of Government Ethics, 
Suite 500, 1201 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20005-3917; 
Telephone: 202-482-9300; TDD: 202-208-9293; FAX: 202-482-9237.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 5 U.S.C. 4314(c) requires each agency to 
establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of 
Personnel Management at 5 CFR part 430, subpart C and Sec.  430.310 
thereof in particular, one or more Senior Executive Service performance 
review boards. As a small executive branch agency, OGE has just one 
board. In order to ensure an adequate level of staffing and to avoid a 
constant series of recusals, the designated members of OGE's SES 
Performance Review Board are being drawn, as in the past, in large 
measure from the ranks of other agencies. The board shall review and 
evaluate the initial appraisal of each OGE senior executive's 
performance by his or her supervisor, along with any recommendations in 
each instance to the appointing authority relative to the performance 
of the senior executive. This notice updates the membership of OGE's 
SES Performance Review Board as it was last published at 69 FR 59230-
59231 (October 4, 2004).

    Approved: November 10, 2005.
Marilyn L. Glynn,
General Counsel, Office of Government Ethics.
    The following officials have been selected as regular members of 
the SES Performance Review Board of the Office of Government Ethics:
    Jane S. Ley [Chair], Deputy Director for Government Relations and 
Special Projects, Office of Government Ethics;
    Daniel D. Dunning [Alternate Chair], Deputy Director for 
Administration and Information Management, Office of Government Ethics;
    Stephen Epstein, Director, Standards of Conduct Office, Department 
of Defense;
    Rosalind A. Knapp, Deputy General Counsel, Department of 
Transportation;

[[Page 69764]]

    Daniel L. Koffsky, Special Counsel, Office of Legal Counsel, 
Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 05-22783 Filed 11-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6345-02-P
#### STATE v. BETHUNE

No. 100 PC.

Case below: 23 N.C. App. 229.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 November 1974.