alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT VINC ENT ASEER

VATHAM , Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 10-73666 Age n c y No. A089-245-077 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Argue d a nd Subm itte d Oc tobe r 16, 2012 Honolulu, Ha

wa ii Subm ission De fe rre d Oc tobe r 17, 2012 R e subm itte d Se pte m

b e r 5, 2013 B e fore : REINHAR

DT, THOM AS, and PAEZ, C irc uit Judge s. Pe titione r Vinc e nt Ase e rvatha m pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m i gration Appe a l s ’ (“ B IA” ) dism issa l of his a ppe a l of the Im

m igrat ion Judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing a sy lum , withholding of re m ova l , a nd re lie f unde r the C onve ntion



# FIL ED SEP 10 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3.Aga inst Torture(“ C AT” ). B e c a use the pa rtie s a re fam ilia r with thehistory

of the c a se , we ne e d not re c ount it here . Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the B IA’ s c onc lusion tha

t Ase e rvatha

m provide d m ate ria l support to a te rrorist orga

niz ation a n d is the re fore ine l igiblefor a sy lum . 8 U.S.C . § 1182(a )(3)(B )(iv)(VI). Ase e rvatha m provide d c om

pute r support for the Libe ra tion Tige r Tam il Ee lam , a de signa te d te rrorist orga

niz ation. C om m unic ations support is a

m o ng the e xam

ple s give n in thesta

tute of prohibite d support a c tivitie s. Id. Ase e rvatha m ’ s c la im tha t the sta tute doe s not a

pply be c a u se he a c te d unde r dure ss is fore c lose d by Annac hamy v . Holde r , __F.3d __, 2013 W L 4405687, a

t *9 (9th C ir. July

3, 2012). Ase e rvatha

m ’ s de pa rture from

the Unite d State s ha s re nde re d m oot his c la im s for withholding of re m ova l a n d C AT re l ie f. 8 C FR

§§ 1241.7, 1208.16(f). 1
PE T IT IO N DE NIE D.

1 This c a se is he re b y

re subm itte d for de c ision. Pe titione r’ s m otion for judic ia l notic e is de n i e d. Se e Fishe r v . I.N .S. , 79 F.3d 955, 963 (9th C ir. 1996). R e sponde nt’ s m otion to e x c e e d the word limit for the le tte r brie f orde re d by this C ourt is de nie d a s m oot. Se e Ninth C ir. R . 32-3(1). -2-
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 219 (Tuesday, November 15, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69350-69351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22621]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
TXNM 100506

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Section 371(a) of the Energy Policy 
Act of 2005, the lessee, Chief Oil and Gas LLC, timely filed a petition 
for reinstatement of oil and gas lease TXNM 100506 in Wise County, TX. 
The lessee paid the required rental accruing from the date of 
termination, March 1, 2002.

[[Page 69351]]

    No leases were issued that affect these lands. The lessee agrees to 
the new lease terms for rentals and royalties of $10 per acre and 16\2/
3\ percent or 4 percentages above the existing competitive royalty 
rate. The lessee paid the $500 administration fee for the reinstatement 
of the lease and $166 cost for publishing this Notice.
    The lessee met the requirements for reinstatement of the lease per 
Sec. 31(e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188(e)). We 
are proposing to reinstate the lease, effective the date of termination 
subject to:
    <bullet> The original terms and conditions of the lease;
    <bullet> The increased rental of $10 per acre;
    <bullet> The increased royalty of 16\2/3\ percent or 4 percentages 
above the existing competitive royalty rate; and
    <bullet> The $166 cost of publishing this Notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lourdes B. Ortiz, BLM, New Mexico 
State Office, (505) 438-7586.

    Dated: October 26, 2005.
Lourdes B. Ortiz,
Land Law Examiner.
[FR Doc. 05-22621 Filed 11-14-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1126

THEODORE JUSTICE,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DR. TIMOTHY FARLEY, Granville County School Superintendent,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior

District Judge. (5:11-cv-00099-BR)

Submitted: March 29, 2012 Decided: April 3, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore Justice, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Teresa Scheef, 

Kenneth Alexander Soo, THARRINGTON, SMITH, LLP, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Theodore Justice seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order granting in part and denying in part the Defendant’s 

motion to dismiss this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(2006) alleging violations of the First and Fourteenth 

Amendments. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over 

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory 

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 

545-46 (1949). The order Justice seeks to appeal is neither a 

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# L_2007258EN.01004401.xml

| 4.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 258/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 258/44

---

Corrigendum to Commission Directive 2007/54/EC of 29 August 2007 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC, concerning cosmetic products, for the purpose of adapting Annexes II and III thereto to technical progress

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 226 of 30 August 2007
  )

On page 27, Annex, point 2(a) should read as follows:

| ‘(a) | Part 1 is amended as follows:






  (i) | in column b of reference number 8, the words ‘p-Phenylenediamine, its N-substituted derivatives and its salts; N-substituted derivatives of o-Phenylenediamine (5), with exception of those derivatives listed elsewhere in this Annex’ are replaced by the following ‘p-Phenylenediamine, its N-substituted derivatives and its salts; N-substituted derivatives of o-Phenylenediamine (5), with the exception of those derivatives listed elsewhere in this Annex and under reference numbers 1309, 1311, and 1312 in Annex II’. |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘(a)

Part 1 is amended as follows:

(i)

in column b of reference number 8, the words ‘p-Phenylenediamine, its N-substituted derivatives and its salts; N-substituted derivatives of o-Phenylenediamine (5), with exception of those derivatives listed elsewhere in this Annex’ are replaced by the following ‘p-Phenylenediamine, its N-substituted derivatives and its salts; N-substituted derivatives of o-Phenylenediamine (5), with the exception of those derivatives listed elsewhere in this Annex and under reference numbers 1309, 1311, and 1312 in Annex II’.

5

5

| (ii) | in column b of reference number 9, the words ‘Methylphenylenediamines, their N-substituted derivatives and their salts (1) with the exception of substance No 364 in Annex II’ are replaced by the following ‘Methylphenylenediamines, their N-substituted derivatives and their salts (1) with the exception of substances under reference numbers 364, 1310 and 1313 in Annex II’.’ |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

in column b of reference number 9, the words ‘Methylphenylenediamines, their N-substituted derivatives and their salts (1) with the exception of substance No 364 in Annex II’ are replaced by the following ‘Methylphenylenediamines, their N-substituted derivatives and their salts (1) with the exception of substances under reference numbers 364, 1310 and 1313 in Annex II’.’

1

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## 

# DPAA Marks 30 Years of Sustained Joint Field Activities with Vietnam

By DPAA Public Affairs

                WASHINGTON  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Opinion withdrawn by court order

filed 5/14/02; another opinion

will issue at later date
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-8108

JOHN MOCK, a/k/a Eric Washington,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (CA-01-786-5)

Submitted: March 12, 2002 Decided: May 9, 2002

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Mock, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

John Mock appeals from the district court’s order dismissing

sua sponte his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001) petition

as untimely. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See Mock v. North Carolina, No.

CA-01-786-5 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 1:06-cv-14988-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14988-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14988-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14988-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14988-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14988-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14988-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14988-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14988-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14988-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14988-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14988-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14988-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15025-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### IN RE TAXABLE STATUS OF PROPERTY

No. 156 PC.

Case below: 45 N.C. App. 632.

Petition by Board of Commissioners for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 June 1980.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Soldier Accounted For From World War II (Dickson, M.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    JUN-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                         JUN-27-1997
<CASH>                                                           452
<SECURITIES>                                                     359
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 19,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     510
<INVENTORY>                                                   19,140
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              43,759
<PP&E>                                                        46,732
<DEPRECIATION>                                                21,672
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                71,119
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         21,014
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                         963
<OTHER-SE>                                                    40,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  71,119
<SALES>                                                      131,941
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             131,941
<CGS>                                                        104,702
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 21,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                (250)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               318
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                5,703
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   1,446
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            4,257
<DISCONTINUED>                                               (10,435)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (6,178)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  (0.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (0.65)
        

</TABLE>
#### CAMERON-BROWN v. SPENCER

No. 10 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 499.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 31 January 1977.
EXHIBIT 21


                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant


<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 21

     Set forth below is a list of MEDIQ Incorporated's subsidiaries as of
December 7, 1998, with their respective states of incorporation, names under
which they do business and the percentage of their voting securities owned by
the Company as of such date.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                     State of        Percentage of
Name                                               Incorporation       Ownership  
----                                               -------------     -------------
<S>                                                     <C>               <C>
MEDIQ/PRN Life Support Services, Inc.                    DE               100
American Cardiovascular Imaging Labs, Inc. (1)           PA               100
MDTC Haddon, Inc.  (2)                                   DE               100
MEDIQ Diagnostic Centers, Inc. (4)                       DE               100
MEDIQ Diagnostic Centers-I, Inc. (2)                     DE               100
MEDIQ Imaging Services, Inc. (3)                         DE               100
MEDIQ Investment Services, Inc. (3)                      DE               100
MEDIQ Management Services, Inc. (3)                      DE               100
MEDIQ Mobile X-Ray Services, Inc. (3)                    DE               100
Value-Med Products, Inc. (3)                             NJ               100
</TABLE>
----------
(1)  Subsidiary of MEDIQ Imaging Services, Inc.
(2)  Subsidiary of MEDIQ Diagnostic Centers, Inc.
(3)  Subsidiary of MEDIQ/PRN Life Support Services, Inc.
(4)  Subsidiary of MEDIQ Management Services, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           22527
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9553781
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                   15494639
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              26723132
<PP&E>                                        13919927
<DEPRECIATION>                              (11996413)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                29655400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1895245
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         31773
<OTHER-SE>                                    29623627
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  29655400
<SALES>                                        8386879
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8843283
<CGS>                                          5052274
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5052274
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2049987
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (4249)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1736773
<INCOME-TAX>                                    703158
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    703158
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03321-PKC Document 7 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2696

GARY J. WINTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

AM-PRO PROTECTIVE AGENCY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CA-95-65-A)

Submitted: November 30, 1995 Decided: April 19, 1996

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary J. Winton, Appellant Pro Se. Bernard Phillip Jeweler,

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, Washington, D.C., for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting

summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging discrimination on the basis of race, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5

(1988). The record reveals that Appellant failed to meet his burden

of establishing a prima facie case of discrimination. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Winton v. Am-Pro

Protective Agency, No. CA-95-65-A (E.D. Va. Aug. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for production of documents is denied.

AFFIRMED