alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>





                                                                      Exhibit 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 2-80041, 2-94701, 33-2517, 33-12762, 33-12763, 33-38145,
33-44693, 33-50598, 33-55092, 33-72160, 333-10553, 333-42163, 333-75269,
333-51776 and 333-64822) of Intermagnetics General Corporation of our report
dated July 16, 1999, relating to the consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows of
Intermagnetics General Corporation and subsidiaries for year ended May 30, 1999,
and the related schedule, which report appears in the May 27, 2001 annual report
on Form 10-K of Intermagnetics General Corporation.

                                                              /s/  KPMG LLP


Albany, New York
August 24, 2001
Order entered November 26, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 00480 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF B.Q.T., A CHILD On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 12 - 07404 - S



### O RDER We DENY appellant’s November 14, 2014 motion for reconsideration of our order granting appellee Thuy Nhu Nguyen’s first motion for an extension of time to file a brief. On the Court’s own motion, any reply brief to appellee Thuy Nhu Nguyen’s bri ef shall be due twenty days after the brief is filed.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
#### THOMAS v. POOLE

No. 98 PC.

Case below: 45 N.C. App. 260.

Petition by defendant for reconsideration of the case denied 3 June 1980.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statements of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 1999 and the
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         156,718
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  537,464
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    171,417
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               867,274
<PP&E>                                         340,631
<DEPRECIATION>                                 326,997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 880,908
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          509,953
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,000
<COMMON>                                       122,824
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   880,908
<SALES>                                      1,434,117
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,441,384
<CGS>                                          885,545
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,229,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,774
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,805
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                180,265
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            164,765
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   164,765
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .01


</TABLE>
#### WILLIAMSON v. WALLACE

No. 194 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 370.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 14 July 1976.
---

CONSENT OF EXPERT

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the
40-F) of Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended
August 31, 2013 to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the Annual Information Form (the AIF) and Managements Discussion
and Analysis(MD&A) of the Company for the year then ended, which
are incorporated by reference therein.

Each of the undersigned hereby consents to the references to,
and the information derived from, the report titled Updated Technical Report
(Updated Feasibility Study) Western Bushveld Joint Venture (Elandsfontein and
Frischgewaagd), dated November 20, 2009 with an effective date of October 8,
2009 and to the references, as applicable, to the undersigneds name, in each
case, included in or incorporated by reference in the 40-F, the AIF and the
MD&A.



Turnberry Projects (Pty) Ltd. By: Turnberry Projects
(Pty) Ltd. Name: Gordon Cunningham Title: Managing Director/Senior
Engineer Date: November 26, 2013



/s/ Gordon Cunningham Gordon I. Cunningham Date:
November 26, 2013



/s/ Timothy Spindler Timothy SpindlerDate:
November 26, 2013

---
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 38 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03344-DFE Document 38 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1



                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Biomet, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-65139, 333-00331, 33-75618, 33-65700,
33-50268, 33-37561, 33-26826 and 33-7361), on Form S-4 (File No. 333-88905) and
on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-50420, 33-27008 and 333-94959) and in the related
Prospectus of our report dated July 9, 2001, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Biomet, Inc. and
subsidiaries at May 31, 2001 and 2000, and for each of the three years in the
period ended May 31, 2001, which report is included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.

                                          /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chicago, Illinois
August 16, 2001
* District Judge of the Western District of Texas, sitting by

designation.

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 16, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-30727

 

IN THE MATTER OF: CAJUN ELECTRIC

POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.,

Debtor,

LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,

Appellant,

versus

RALPH R. MABEY, Trustee; RURAL UTILITIES

SVC; SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP

CORP.,

Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

(02-CV-243-B)

--------------------

Before WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges, and FURGESON,*

District Judge.

PER CURIAM:**

Plaintiff-Appellant Louisiana Public Service Commission

(“LPSC”) appeals the Bankruptcy Court’s denial of LPSC’s claim for

amounts due under the terms of a settlement agreement stemming from
2

the bankruptcy of Debtor Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.

(“Cajun”). The Bankruptcy Court grounded its rejection of LPSC’s

claim on the court’s contractual interpretation to the effect that,

under the terms of a settlement memorandum referred to as

“LPSC/RUS/Trustee Term Sheet,” Cajun was not required to continue

the so-called “interest rate escrow payments.” 

When distilled to its essence, the LPSC’s argument is that the

pre-existing orders of the LPSC are the law; that every contract ——

including the instant settlement as reflected in the term sheet and

other instruments and correspondence —— remain subject to the law;

and that the subsisting orders of the LPSC mandate that Cajun

continue to make full payment into the subject escrow account. The

Trustee’s position, oversimplified, is that in Louisiana the

contract is the law between the parties; the parties can contract

around or out of any laws that are not mandatory or do not embody

public policy; and that the parties to the settlement agreement ——

one being the LPSC, which issued the orders in question —— did so

in the instant settlement to the extent it is incompatible with

those orders.

We have reviewed the applicable portions of the record on

appeal, paying particular attention to the term sheet and related

correspondence and documentation, and we have reviewed the

excellent appellate briefs of counsel and listened carefully to

their equally excellent oral arguments. In the end, we are

satisfied that the Bankruptcy Court, as affirmed by the district
3

court, committed no reversible errors in its legal rulings, made no

clearly erroneous findings of fact, and did not abuse its

discretion in the exercise thereof. Consequently, the applicable

rulings and judgment of the Bankruptcy Court are, in all respects,

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1



                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                   State of                    Percent of Voting
Significant Subsidiaries                                         Incorporation                 Securities Owned
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                         <C>                                 <C> 
American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida                       Florida                     100%

American Bankers Life Assurance Company of
  Florida                                                           Florida                     100%

Bankers American Reinsurance Company                        Turks & Caicos Islands              100%

Caribbean American Life Assurance Company                         Puerto Rico                   100%

Voyager Group, Inc.                                                 Florida                     100%
</TABLE>



































                                      E-1
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NOS. WR-95,344-01 & WR-95,344-02
EX P ARTE SAMANTHA GARCIA, Applicant
ON AP P LICATIONS F OR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS. 2011CR1577A-W1 & 2011CR2193-W1 IN THE 290TH DISTRICT COURT F ROM BEXAR COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Applicant pleaded no contest to two charg es o f p ossession o f less than o n e gr a m of a controlled substance in Penalty Group One. In each c ase, she received deferred adjudication and was sentenced to 4 ye ars’ community supervision. On a djudication, she received sentences o f 1 year in the Tex as Department of Criminal J ustice–State J a il Division. Applicant filed these applications f or writs o f h ab e a s c orpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded them to this Court. See T EX . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . a rt. 11.07. Applicant contends that trial counsel w a s ineffective because he operate d u n d e r an actual conflict of interest, placing his p ersonal interests over Applicant’s interest. Specifically , trial counsel
r e p eatedly demanded sex ual performance from Applicant ag ainst her will. He did n ot discus s t h e2

facts o f her cases or any po ssible defenses, or interview p otential witnesses. Counsel f alsely told Applicant that he could sway the trial judg e’s decisions. He threatened to ex ercise his power with the judg e t o h u rt Applicant’s cases if she did not a ccede to his sex ual demands. He frightened Applicant into complying
. F ollowing a hearing , the habeas court made finding s of fact and conclusions of law in which it recommended that habeas relief be granted as to applicant’s claim that trial c ounsel labored under
an actual conflict of interest due to his sex ual misconduct towards applicant, thereby r e sulting in a denial of h er Six th Amendment r ig ht to the effective assistance of counsel. Counsel’s only interest in Applicant’s cases was as leverag e to demand Applicant’s sex ual performance. The trial court has determined that trial counsel’s performance was deficient and that Applicant was prejudiced. R e l i e f i s granted. Strickland v. W ashington , 466 U
. S. 668 (1984). The judg ments in cause numbers 2011CR1577A and 2011CR2193 in the 290th District Court of B ex ar County a re set aside. Applicant shall answer the charg es as set out in the indictments. T h e trial court shal l issue any necessary orders within ten days from the date of this Court’s mandate. C o p ies of this opinion shall be sent to the Tex as Department of Criminal Ju s t i c e
–C o r r e c t i o n a l Institutions Division and the B oard of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: J anuary

10, 2024 Do not publish
Order entered July 22, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00216-CR

NATHAN EARL BURGESS, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 001-86625-2012

ORDER

The Court has received a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s order 

granting Alan Kramer Taggart’s motion to withdraw and the order appointing William Schultz to 

represent appellant. Accordingly, we DIRECT the Clerk to substitute William Schultz as 

appellant’s appointed attorney of record in place of Alan Kramer Taggart.

We ORDER Mr. Schultz to file appellant’s brief within THIRTY DAYS of the date of 

this order.

The Court DENIES appellant’s July 17, 2014 pro se motion to extend time to file his 

brief. See Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981).

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to 

William Schultz, Alan Taggart, and the Collin County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
#### WILLIAM BRYSON DAVIS v. TOM B. SUMMITT and ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY.

(Filed 6 March 1963.)

Master and Servant § 63—

Evidence that claimant received 'an injury while attempting, alone, to elevate and hold a 175 pound cabinet in place while another workman secured it to the wall, and that .three men were usually assigned to the installation of such cabinets' on the construction job, *is held,*sufficient to sustain a finding that claimant suffered a compensable injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.

Appeal by defendants from *McConnell, S.J.,*November, 1962 Civil Term, Gaston Superior Court.

*58This proceeding originated as .a compensation claim filed before the North Carolina Industrial Commission to recover temporary total and permanent partial disability benefits for injury sustained in an industrial accident.

The evidence tended to show, and the Hearing Commissioner found that three men were usually assigned to the installation of cabinets on the employer’s construction jobs. On the occasion of claimant’s injury, he and one fellow employee (Adams) were given the assignment. A base cabinet had been installed. “Adams got up on the bottom cabinet while the plaintiff stood on the floor; both were handling the cabinet — approximately six and one-half feet long, forty-two inches tall, and weighed approximately 175 pounds.” The claimant alone was attempting to hold the cabinet in place while Adams secured it to the wall. According to plaintiff’s testimony, corroborated by Adams, the claimant suffered injury in attempting to elevate and hold the cabinet in place — a task usually assigned to two men. His medical testimony supported the claim of injury.

The Hearing Commissioner, the Full Commission, and the Superior Court approved the findings of fact and sustained the award of compensation. The defendants appealed.

*Whitener & Mitchem, by Basil Whitener, by Wade W. Mitchem, for defendants, appellants.*

*No counsel contra.*

Per Curiam.

The jurisdictional facts, including the average weekly wage, were stipulated. The evidence was sufficient to permit the finding that claimant suffered a compensable injury by accident arising out of and in the cqurse of his employment. The defendants’ objections go to the weight of the evidence rather than to its competency. The weight was for the Commission. The judgment awarding compensation is

Affirmed.
Case 1:06-cv-15140-AKH Document 6 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-15140-AKH Document 6 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 11

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                 BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE                            SHARES
                 ------------------------                            ------

                 Basic shares outstanding at March 31, 2000         1,955,379

                        NET EARNINGS            $159,959       $.08 per share
                 ------------------------      ---------
                 Basic shares outstanding      1,955,379


                 DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE                          SHARES
                 --------------------------                          ------

                 Basic shares outstanding at March 31, 2000         1,955,379
                 Stock Options-common stock equivalents               114,413
                                                                    ---------
                 Diluted shares outstanding at March 31,2000        2,069,792

                         NET EARNINGS           $156,959       $.08 per share
                 --------------------------     --------
                 Diluted shares outstanding     2,069,792
#### STATE v. CARTER

No. 16 PC.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 461.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 March 1974;
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-19865, 33-51840, 33-51838 and 333-59647)
of PharmaKinetics Laboratories, Inc. of our report, dated August 13, 1999,
except for the third paragraph of Note G, as to which the date is September 3,
1999, related to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of PharmaKinetics Laboratories, Inc. at June 30, 1999 and 1998, and for
each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 1999, which appears in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                          /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                          PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Baltimore, Maryland
September 28, 1999
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 8      Filed 06/26/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03312-PAC Document 7-6 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03312-PAC Document 7-6 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 28-7 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 28-7 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Eaton Vance Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Laurie G. Hylton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|DATE: December 21, 2018 |  |  | /s/ Laurie G. Hylton   
|----------------------- |  |  | -----------------------
|                        |  |  | (Signature)            
|                        |  |  | Laurie G. Hylton       
|                        |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Case 1:06-cv-15144-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15144-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15144-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15144-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15144-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15144-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15144-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15144-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15144-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15144-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15144-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15144-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15144-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Riggs National Corporation
(the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven
T. Tamburo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

By: /S/ STEVEN T. TAMBURO
Name: Steven T. Tamburo
Chief Financial Officer
March 11, 2004