alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 16, 2014

NO. 03

- 10

- 00016

- CV

TJFA, L.P. and Concerned Citizens and Landowners, Appellant s

v.

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Waste Management of Texas, Inc., App ellee s

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PEMBERTON, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judg ment signed by the tr i a l court on December 9, 2009. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. The

app ellant s shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
#### HODGES v. WELLONS

No. 3 PC.

Case below: 9 N.C. App. 152.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 October 1970.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  OF EPOCH HOLDING CORPORATION

I,
Adam Borak, certify that:

(1)   I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Epoch Holding Corporation (the "Registrant");

(2)   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial position,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)   The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a - 15(f) and
15d -15(f)) for the registrant and have:



(5)   The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Dated: September 8, 2010

By:

/s/ ADAM BORAK Adam Borak Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


---



QuickLinks
Argued and submitted August 27, 1998,

reversed and remanded April 14, 1999

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Appellant, v.*RAMONA E. JOHNSON, *Respondent.*

(9702-40877; CA A97244)

978 P2d 454

Robert M. Atkinson, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the opening brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General,. and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General. With him on the reply brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Garrett A. Richardson argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Multnomah Defenders.

Before De Muniz, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Haselton, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded. *State v. Lhasawa,*159 Or App 667, 979 P2d 774 (1999).
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 17-11      Filed 02/01/2005     Page 1 of 3

Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 17-11      Filed 02/01/2005     Page 2 of 3

Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 17-11      Filed 02/01/2005     Page 3 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-15097-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15097-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15097-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15097-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15097-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15097-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15097-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15097-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15097-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15097-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15097-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15097-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15097-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
#### STATE v. GRANT

No. 54 PC and No. 87.

Case below: 19 N.C. App. 401.

. Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 November 1973. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 1 November 1973.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000052617
<NAME> IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          56,960
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          28,444
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                47,589
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     26,235
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          18,266
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            18,365
<LOANS>                                        613,087
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,812
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,620,873
<DEPOSITS>                                     908,103
<SHORT-TERM>                                   384,123
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             73,832
<LONG-TERM>                                     54,030
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           48,035
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,965
<OTHER-SE>                                     122,785
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,620,873
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 24,197
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,128
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                35,739
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                62,064
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,413
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,356
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           35,708
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,531
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                109,934
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,409
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      30,409
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,585
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.77<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.76<F1>
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     .05<F2>
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,652
<LOANS-PAST>                                       374
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,888
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,036
<RECOVERIES>                                       331
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,812
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,812
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,833
<FN>
<F1>Information not in 1,000 and earnings per share reported in basic and
diluted.
<F2>Information not in 1,000.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Dimas Meza MEZA, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-72106.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 2005.**

Decided April 4, 2005.

Dimas Meza Meza, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, San Francisco, CA, Stephen J. Flynn, Julia K. Doig, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Dimas Meza Meza, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the BIA’s summary affirmance without opinion of an IJ’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l). We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Meza’s contention that the BIA erred in concluding that his removal to Mexico would not cause “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” to his United States citizen son. See *Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Intermagnetics General Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending May 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael K. Burke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Michael K. Burke*
------------------------------
Michael K. Burke
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2004


* These certifications are being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to
the liability of that Section. These certifications shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.
Exhibit 10.17
​

关于欺诈发行上市的股份购回的承诺函
Letter of Commitment on Share Repurchase for Fraudulent Listing
鉴于北京通美晶体技术股份有限公司(以下简称“公司”)拟申请首次公开发行股票并在科创板上市(以下简称“本次发行上市”),公司及公司控股股东承诺如下:
In view that Beijing Tongmei Xtal Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the Company”) plans to apply for an IPO (initial public offering) and be listed on the Science and Technology Innovation Board (hereinafter referred to as “this Listing”), the Company and the Company’s controlling shareholder undertake as follows:
一、保证公司本次发行上市不存在任何欺诈发行的情形。
I. To guarantee that there is no fraud in this Listing of the Company.
二、如公司不符合发行上市条件,以欺骗手段骗取发行注册并已经发行上市的,公司及公司控股股东将在中国证券监督管理委员会等有权部门认定并生效(如涉及诉讼的,以司法机关最终判决为准)后5个工作日内启动股份回购程序,回购公司本次公开发行的全部新股,具体回购责任承担以中国证券监督管理委员会等有权部门最终认定为准。
II. If the Company does not meet the listing conditions, but fraudulently obtains the issuance registration and has been listed, the Company and the Company’s controlling shareholder will start the share repurchase procedure within 5 working days upon the effective affirmation made by the authorities such as China Securities Regulatory Commission (if any litigation is involved, the final judgment made by the juridical authority shall prevail) to repurchase all new stocks issued by the Company publicly this time. Assumption of specific repurchase responsibilities shall be subject to the final affirmation made by the authorities such as China Securities Regulatory Commission.
​
(本页以下无正文)
(There is no text below this page)
​
​

3/10/2022  9:15 AM  译文-10.17_、400-关Share repurchase if deemed to be fraudulent.docx  Folder-        1 of 3
​




Exhibit 10.17
​

(本页无正文,为《关于欺诈发行上市的股份购回的承诺函》的签署页)
(Without text, this page is a signing page of Letter of Commitment on Share Repurchase for Fraudulent Listing)
​
北京通美晶体技术股份有限公司
Beijing Tongmei Xtal Technology Co., Ltd.
(盖章)
(Sealed)
日期:年月日
Date: MM/DD/YY
​
​

3/10/2022  9:15 AM  译文-10.17_、400-关Share repurchase if deemed to be fraudulent.docx  Folder-        2 of 3
​




Exhibit 10.17
​

(本页无正文,为《关于欺诈发行上市的股份购回的承诺函》的签署页)
(Without text, this page is a signing page of Letter of Commitment on Share Repurchase for Fraudulent Listing)
​
控股股东:
Controlling shareholder:
	​
	AXT, Inc.
(盖章)
(Sealed)
​
签署:
Signed by:
姓名:MORRIS SHEN-SHIH YOUNG
Name: MORRIS SHEN-SHIH YOUNG
职务:授权代表
Title: authorized representative
​
日期:年月日
Date: MM/DD/YY



​

3/10/2022  9:15 AM  译文-10.17_、400-关Share repurchase if deemed to be fraudulent.docx  Folder-        3 of 3
​
Case 1:06-cv-15032-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 34      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 1 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 34      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 2 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 34      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 3 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 34      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 4 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 34      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 5 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 34      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 6 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 34      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 7 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 34      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 8 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 34      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 9 of 10

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 34      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 10 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-03360-GBD     Document 6      Filed 07/26/2007     Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. WATLINGTON

No. 70.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 101.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 September 1976. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 1 September 1976.
Case 1:06-cv-15133-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15100-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15107-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
全国劳资关系法(THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT,NLRA)保障劳工拥有组

织和集体同埋距地雇主嘅谈判嘅权利, 保障劳工拥有组织和集体与其雇主进行谈判的权

利,拥有参加其它受保护集体行动的权利。全国劳资关系法保护劳工免受来自雇主或

工会特定类型不正当行为的侵害。本宣传材料针对全国劳工关系法赋予您的权利,和

雇主与工会应履行的义务向您做简要介绍。如果您对适用您所在的具体工作岗位的具

体权利具有任何疑问,请通过以下联系信息联系国家劳资关系委员会(National Labor 

Relations Board)。国家劳资关系委员会是根据全国劳资关系法负责调查和解决相关控

诉的联邦机构。

根据全国劳资关系法,您拥有

以下权利:

• 组织成立工会,以与您的雇主就您

的工资、工作时间、和与雇佣相关

的其他条件条款进行谈判。

• 组织,参加或支持工会。

• 通过劳工代表与雇主进行集体

谈判,有权选择与您的雇主就您的

工资、权益、工作时间,和其他工

作条件签订合同。

• 与由一起工作的同事或工会就工作

与组织条件条款进行讨论。

• 与一个或更多同事,通过向您的雇

主或政府机构直接提起与工作相

关的控诉,或通过其他诸多方式途

径,并寻求工会组织的帮助,一

起采取行动改善您的工作条件。

• 根据罢工或纠察的方式与目的进行

罢工和纠察。

• 选择拒绝进行以上任何活动,包括

参加或退出工会组织。

劳工权利

根据全国劳资关系法

严禁违法行为。严禁违法行为的发生。

如果您认为您的权利,或者其他人的权利受

到了侵犯,您应及时联系全国劳工关系局

(NLRB)以保护您的权利,一般应在违法行

为发生后 6 个月内进行联系。您可以就可能

的违法行为进行查询,而不需要通知您的雇

主或其他人获悉此项查询。任何人均可以书

写提交控诉,并且可以不需要被违法行为直

接影响的劳工书写提交。全国劳工关系局可

以要求发生违法行为的雇主重新雇佣被解雇

的工人,并且向工人支付因解雇损失的薪资

和收益,也可以要求雇主或工会停止违犯法

律的行为。劳工可以从最近的全国劳工关系

局地方办公室寻求帮助,可以通过全国劳工

关系局的网站获得这些办公室的信息,网址

www.nlrb.gov.

如果您或您的同事选择了工会代表您们进行集体劳

资谈判,您的雇主和工会应被要求真诚地进行谈

判,付出真正的努力以达成一个书面的、对双方均

具有约束力的协议,约定您的工作条件条款。工会

应被要求公平地代表您进行谈判,认真落实协议。

您也可以拨打免费电话联系国家劳资关系委

员会 (NLRB):1-844-762-NLRB (6572)。

我們可提供語言協助。希望与 NLRB 

代表通话的听障人士应发送电子邮件至

relay.service@nlrb.gov。NLRB 代表将通过

电子邮件向请求者发送有关如何安排中继服

务呼叫时间的说明。 

*国家劳资关系法对大多数私人雇主均有约束力。

政府公共部门嘅雇主、农业和家庭劳动者,独立经营

嘅承包商、由父母或配偶雇佣嘅工人,由铁路劳动法

管辖嘅航空和铁路承运部门嘅工人和管理者(尽管曾

经因拒绝违犯全国劳资关系法而受到歧视嘅管理者可

以被涉及)等,不属全国劳资关系法管辖范围。

根据全国劳资关系法,如果 

某工会或代表您与您的雇主 

进行谈判的工会有以下行为系

违法:

• 威胁您,除非您支持工会,您将丢

失工作。

• 因为您曾经批评过工会官员或者因

为您不是工会成员,拒绝处理您的

控诉。

• 在对来自职业介绍所的人员进行工

作推荐时,采用或具有歧视性标准

或程序。

• 因为您的与工会相关活动,导致或

试图导致雇主对您产生歧视。

• 因为您参加或支持工会,采取其他

不利您的针对性行为。

根据全国劳资关系法,您雇主

的以下行为系违法:

• 阻止您在非工作时间,比如上班时间

前或上班时间后,或休息时间寻求工

会帮助,参加工会活动;或者在非工

作时间,非工作区域,比如停车场或

休息间,分发工会文件资料。

• 就您得到的工会帮助或您参加的工会

活动对您进行任何形式的盘问,阻止

您参加这些活动。

• 因为您参加或支持工会,或者因为您

参加了统一的互助或保护行动,或者

因为您选择不参与任何类似行动,您

被解雇、降级,或调换岗位,或减少

工作时间,或调换值班时间,或与此

相反,您受到了对自身不利的对待,

或被威胁将被采取以上任何形式的

对待。

• 如果劳工选择工会来代表自己,威胁

要撤销您们的工作岗位。

• 承诺或保证给与升职、加薪,或其他

利益以阻碍或鼓励工会的帮助。

• 阻止您在工作场所佩戴具有工会标志

的帽子、饰扣、T 恤和胸针,但特殊

情况除外。

• 监视或拍摄和平的工会活动或集会,

或试图进行此类行为。

此为政府公告,任何人不得污损。 Technical Revision Date: 05/02/22

扫描了解更多
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As
Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Unified Grocers, Inc. (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alfred A. Plamann, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: December 10, 2010



/S/ ALFRED A. PLAMANNAlfred A. Plamann President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal executive
officer)




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE v. O’NEAL

No. 67 PC.

Case below: 17 N.C. App. 644.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 June 1973.
#### Maria GONZALEZ-REYES, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-72323, [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 4, 2005.**

Decided April 11, 2005.

Maria Gonzalez-Reyes, Orange, CA, pro se.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Mark C. Walters, Esq., Anh-Thu P. Mai, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before KOZINSKI, HAWKINS and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 43(c)(2).

**

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Maria Gonzalez-Reyes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Where, as here, the BIA affirms without opinion, we review the IJ’s decision. *See Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 849 (9th Cir.2003). We review constitutional issues de novo. *See Ram v. INS,*243 F.3d 510 (9th Cir.2001). We deny the petition for review.

Petitioner contends that she was denied equal protection because she was not allowed to apply for suspension of deportation. Petitioner’s argument is without merit because Congress comported with equal protection when it repealed suspen*190sion of deportation for aliens, such as petitioner, who were placed in removal proceedings on or after April 1, 1997, while permitting aliens placed in deportation before that date to maintain their applications for suspension of deportation. *See Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft,*324 F.3d 1105, 1108 (9th Cir.2003); *Hernandez-Mezquita v. Ashcroft,*293 F.3d 1161, 1163-65 (9th Cir.2002).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 jjjjg disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Platinum Group Metals
Ltd. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended August 31, 2013, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, R. Michael Jones, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





| | /s/R. MICHAEL JONES                            
| | -----------------------------------------------
| | R. Michael Jones                               
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
| | November 26, 2013                              

---
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-2 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-2 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 2 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-2 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 3 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-2 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 4 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-2 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 5 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-2 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 6 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-2 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 7 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-2 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 8 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-2 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 9 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-2 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 10 of 11
Case 7:07-cv-03302-KMK-LMS Document 46-2 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 11 of 11