alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Perth Amboy District Court.

#### GEORGE W. TYRRELL, PLAINTIFF, v. STANDARD UNDERGROUND CABLE COMPANY, DEFENDANT.

Decided June 4, 1932.

For the plaintiff, *David T. Wilentz.*

For the defendant, *John G. Btockel.*

Goldberger, J.

The summons in this case was issued in 1927 by the plaintiff, who is a physician in the city of Perth Amboy, to recover the sum of $184 which represents his bill for services rendered to one James Kozak, an employe of the defendant corporation.

The facts as I remember them are that in May, 1927, Kozak was injured in an accident during the course of his employment, and he was removed to the Perth Amboy City Hospital in an unconscious condition. Dr. Tyrrell, a member of the staff, was present at the time. A hurried examination of the patient caused the plaintiff to get in touch with the defendant corporation through its superintendent, Mr. Hawley, and the plaintiff advised Mr. Hawley that the patient was in a very bad way, and would require an unusual amount of care, including special nurses, in order to bring about a recovery. The plaintiff was requested by Mr. Hawley to give all the attention necessary to bring about the recovery of the patient, who had been injured by reason of his clothes having come in contact with a rapidly revolving shaft, which shaft caused his clothes to strangle him for several minutes before the machine could be stopped. The patient had hemorrhages of the brain and odema of both lungs, and a part of his flesh was torn away from his body.

*808The defendant corporation resists payment on two grounds, (1) that the agreement should have been in writing, and (2) that the plaintiff comes within the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation act.

The defendant relies mainly upon the ease of *Moore*v. *Derees,*97 *N. J. L.*378; 117 *Atl. Rep.*480. I do not agree with such contention because in that case the services were rendered by the physician to the employe, at the request of the employe; but in this case, the evidence is that the physician acted at the request of the defendant corporation through its superintendent, who was the manager in charge of the plant at the time of the accident, and as such, would have a right to bind the company.

The compensation statute is only binding upon the parties to the statutory contract, and they and they only are entitled to its benefits and are bound by its terms. The plaintiff is not bound by the Compensation act. *Dias*v. *New Jersey Manufacturing Co.,*4 *N. J. Mis. R.*102; 132 *Atl. Rep.*101; *Rosecrans*v. *Reiner,*4 *N. J. Mis. R.*769.

There will be a judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $184 and interest from July-3d, 1927, in the sum of $54.30.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on this 5th day of September, 2007, I caused a copy of the foregoing 

NOTICE OF MOTION OF DEFENDANT MERCK & CO., INC. TO DISMISS WITH 

PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE PLAINTIFF PROFILE FORM, DECLARATION 

OF THEODORE V. H. MAYER, and MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION 

OF DEFENDANT MERCK & CO., INC. TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE 

TO PROVIDE PLAINTIFF PROFILE FORM to be served via first-class mail, postage prepaid, 

on the following: 

HERSH & HERSH 

A Professional Corporation 

Nancy Hersh, Esq. 

Mark E. Burton, Esq. 

Rachel Abrams, Esq. 

2080 Opera Plaza 

601 Van Ness Avenue 

San Francisco, CA 94102-6388 

LEVIN PAPANTONIO THOMAS 

MITCHELL ECHSNER & PROCTOR PA 

Timothy O’Brien 

316 South Baylen Street, Suite 600 (32502) 

P.O. Box 12308 

Pensacola, FL 32591 

SEEGER WEISS LLP 

Christopher A. Seeger 

One William Street 

New York, NY 10004 

 The above addresses have appeared on the prior papers in this action as the office address 

of the attorneys for Plaintiff. 

 Deponent is over the age of 18 years and not a party to this action. 

 I further certify under penalty of perjury that under the laws of the United States of 

America the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on September 5, 2007 

 /s/ 

 Theodore V.H. Mayer 

Case 1:07-cv-03295-JFK Document 5-2 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Under the provisions of Section 371(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the lessee, Chief Oil and Gas LLC, timely filed a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease TXNM 100506 in Wise County, TX. The lessee paid the required rental accruing from the date of termination, March 1, 2002.                              ( print page 69351)    

                        No leases were issued that affect these lands. The lessee agrees to the new lease terms for rentals and royalties of $10 per acre and 16                        2/3                         percent or 4 percentages above the existing competitive royalty rate. The lessee paid the $500 administration fee for the reinstatement of the lease and $166 cost for publishing this Notice.                    

The lessee met the requirements for reinstatement of the lease per Sec. 31(e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188(e)). We are proposing to reinstate the lease, effective the date of termination subject to:
      - The original terms and conditions of the lease;
      - The increased rental of $10 per acre;
      - The increased royalty of 162/3                         percent or 4 percentages above the existing competitive royalty rate; and                    
      - The $166 cost of publishing this Notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lourdes B. Ortiz, BLM, New Mexico State Office, (505) 438-7586.

Dated: October 26, 2005.

Lourdes B. Ortiz,

Land Law Examiner.

[FR Doc. 05-22621 Filed 11-14-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
Case 1:06-cv-14946-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14946-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14946-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14946-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14946-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14946-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14946-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14946-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14946-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14946-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14946-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14946-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14946-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5656 

To amend the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to extend 

the period for which certain nutrition assistance may be provided under 

the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 30, 2010 

Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin (for herself, Mr. STARK, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. MEEKS

of New York, Mr. FILNER, Ms. KILPATRICK of Michigan, Ms. LEE of 

California, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. CLAY, Ms. 

FUDGE, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. OLVER, Ms. WATSON, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, and Mr. DAVIS of Illinois) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 

of 2009 to extend the period for which certain nutrition 

assistance may be provided under the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supplemental Nutri5 tion Assistance Program for the Jobless Act of 2010’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5656 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

2 Section 101(e) of the Recovery and Reinvestment Act 

3 of 2009 (Public Law 111–5; 123 Stat. 121) is amended— 

4 (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘2010’’ and in5 serting ‘‘2011’’, and 

6 (2) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘2010’’ the 

7 last place it appears and inserting ‘‘2011’’. 

8 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

9 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

10 take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, or 

11 on September 30, 2010, whichever occurs earlier. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### IN RE CONFINEMENT OF HAYES

No. 138 PC.

Case below: 18 N.C. App. 560.

Petition by Attorney General for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 September 1973. Appeal dismissed 1 September 1973.
!y F{y Y1'Y ': l ELKC;':*'.:: ~:c;,L., 1 *-& !; C'NITEU STATES DIS'I'RICT COIJRT ? i ! ! DOC 2: ;r S(lU'l'1 IERN DISTRICT Ol NEW YORK i _.__._l.r_ _ E, i \\;~gr~;~-{i,i:,-;:): --- 5:3&-cR ..," 7; I. - t 

:,__ .--" .--.- ---. .u.-,rrF---"-' .,'+--., .-. .I <.- ' 

IK RE: 

j MAS-I'EK FlLE 

FOSAhl,AX PRODTJCTS LI;\131LI'l'Y I I I'IG.4TION 

I 1 106-MD- 1789 (Jl'K) 

l'hir. Ur)c./,nrr.n~ Kt~/tr!c.s Tu All Acriotw 

OKI)EK FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC \'1C E 

Considcring thc Ccrtiticate oS Good Sta~ldi~~g and all nthcr documents required by Case 

Managenlent Order No. 3 submitted by counsel. IT IS HFREI31' 0RT)ERE':T) that: 

Applicant's Name: S. Lccnan C';irter 

Firm Name: iVnllcr. Lansden. Dortch & Davis, I .I .P 

Address: 51 1 1 Inion Streil.l. Suite 2700 

is adulirtcd to practice pro hac \.ice as cou~lsel for hlcrck & Co., lnc, in the above captionrd case 

\ in the United States District Court for the Suulhel.n Ilistrict of Ncw Ynrk. 

A 

'" Jlaled: ~a~'.. 7008 

New Yorli. Kt.\v I'rlrh 

. . . . . . .- . LfA, - . 

llnitcd Status Ilist rid Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03294-JFK Document 28 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 1 of 2
CEItTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING 

; ss, 

.\.lIUULE DISTRICT OF TENNKSSI'II 

1. KEI'I'H 'I'HIIOClihlOII'I'I~.U. Clerk ui' the L'nilcd Slates Ilistrict C:ourt for the Middle 

1)istr.icl of'l'cnncsscc. 

110 I Il-,KIX3Y C'ER'I I1 Y I hat S. KEENAN CARTER lvas duly ndmittcd li! jlrdct~cc in said 

('our1 on ,lutlc 2Sih, 2004, :ind IS in good standing as a rneu~bcr 01' ~hu b;~r 01-said Courr. 

Case 1:07-cv-03294-JFK Document 28 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 2 of 2
ltco_ex107.htm

EXHIBIT 10.7
  
 LONG TERM CARE OPERATIONS 360, INC. 
 SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT
  
  
 Long Term Care Operations 360, Inc.
 5522 New Peachtree Rd., Suite 122
 Chamblee, GA 30341
  
 RE: Long Term Care Operations 360, Inc. Common Stock
  
 Ladies and Gentlemen:
  
 The undersigned investor in this Subscription Agreement hereby acknowledges receipt of the Prospectus, dated __________________, 2022, of Long Term Care Operations 360, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and subscribes for the following number of shares upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Prospectus.
  
 The Investor agrees that this Subscription Agreement is subject to availability and acceptance by the Company.
  
 The Investor hereby subscribes for ____________ shares of the Company’s common stock (“Common Stock”) at $1.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $____________. 
  
 Payment of $____________ as payment in full of the purchase price is being made via check directly to the Company. 
  
 If this subscription is rejected by the Company, in whole or in part, for any reason, all funds will be returned within three business days of the Company’s receipt of such funds, without interest or deduction of any kind.
  
 Purchaser Information:
  
 	 Printed Name: 
	  
	 ____________________________

	  
	  
	  

	 Signature: 
	  
	 ____________________________

	  
	  
	  

	 Date:
	  
	 ____________________________

	  
	  
	  

	 Address:
	  
	 ____________________________

	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	 ____________________________

	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	 ____________________________


   
 The foregoing Subscription is hereby accepted in full on behalf of Long Term Care Operations 360, Inc.
  
  
 Date: ___________________
  
 	 LONG TERM CARE OPERATIONS 360, INC.:
	  

	  
	  
	  

	 By: 
	  
	  

	 Name: 
	 Sameer Shah
	  

	 Title: 
	 President & CEO
Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health

February 16, 2018

Mr. R. Alexander Acosta
Secretary of Labor
Department of Labor

200 Constitution Ave.
Washington, DC NW 20210

Honorable Secretary Acosta:

On behalf of the Department of Labor Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker
Health, I submit the attached revised Advisory Board recommendations and comments in
relation to the Department’s responses to the recommendations that the Advisory Board made at
our October 2016 and April 2017 meetings. We also provide a list of issues that may help guide
the next Board. These recommendations and comments are within the scope of the chartered
mission of the Advisory Board and represent our best efforts to address multiple aspects of the
current Energy Employees Occupational IIIness Compensation Program.

We are pleased by the continued support and enthusiastic cooperation of Ms. Hearthway,
Mr. Steinberg, Ms. Leiton and the rest of the leadership and staff of the Office of Workers
Compensation Program and the Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness
Compensation.

We sincerely hope that our advice is useful to the Department. We thank you for the
opportunity to serve as Board members and wish the Program continued success in meeting the
needs of the United States energy employees. Please let us know if there are questions.

i a

teven Markowitz MD, DrPH
Chair
Advisory Board on Toxic Substances
and Worker Health
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-65113, 333-84848, 333-96717 and
333-110553) on Forms S-8 of Cache, Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial
statement schedule of Cache, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph referring to the adoption of the provisions of Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment"), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Cache, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 30, 2006.

/s/DELOITTE AND TOUCHE LLPNew York, New York
March 13, 2008

---



QuickLinks
#### Scott M. LANDESMAN; et al., Plaintiffs—Appellees, v. THE KEYS CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-17386.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 2005.*

Decided March 30, 2005.

D. Scott Chang, Esq., D. Scott Chang, Esq., Belmont, CA, Kerry M. Gough, Esq., Gough & Cohen, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

John Joseph Stander, Esq., Max A. Truax, Esq., Paul P. Terry, Esq., Angius *&*Terry, LLP, Walnut Creek, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

This preliminary injunction appeal comes to us for review under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

We subject a district court’s order regarding preliminary injunctive relief only to limited review. *Walczak v. EPL Prolong, Inc.,*198 F.3d 725, 730 (9th Cir.1999). Our review of an order regarding a preliminary injunction “is much more limited than review of an order involving a permanent injunction, where all conclusions of law are freely reviewable.” *Id.*A decision regarding a preliminary injunction is reviewed for abuse of discretion, which occurs only if the district court based its decision on either an erroneous legal standard or clearly erroneous factual findings. *Id.*

The district court has not abused its discretion here. We therefore affirm the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part the preliminary injunction. Our disposition will affect the rights of the parties only until the district court renders final judgment. *Sports Form, Inc. v.**147*United Press International,*686 F.2d 750, 752 (9th Cir.1982).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7717
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARK PAUL SARNO, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-133, CA-96-97) Submitted: March 31, 1997 Decided: April 25, 1997 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Paul Sarno, Appellant Pro Se. Sherry L. Muncy, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no re versible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sarno , Nos. CR-91-133; CA-96-97 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (2.29 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery