alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER ADOPTING NEW RULE 113.1, 

AMENDING RULES 560 AND 575 AND 

REVISING THE COMMENT TO RULE 

578 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES 

OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 500

CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES

DOCKET 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5

th day of January, 2018, upon the recommendation of the 

Criminal Procedural Rules Committee; the proposal having been published before 

adoption at 47 Pa.B. 4674 (August 12, 2017), and a Final Report to be published with 

this ORDER:

It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania 

that Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 113.1 is adopted, Rules of Criminal 

Procedure 560 and 575 are amended and the Comment to Pennsylvania Rule of 

Criminal Procedure 578 is revised, in the attached form. 

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall 

be effective January 6, 2018.

Additions to the rules are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rules are shown in bold and brackets.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT (10)(p)

                      AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                       ---------------------------------

    THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated January 18, 2000, by and
between  C-COR.net CORP., a Pennsylvania  corporation (the "Company"),  and
RICHARD E. PERRY (the "Employee").

                                  BACKGROUND
                                  ----------

     A. The Employee  and the Company  entered into an Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement on July 21, 1997 (the "Employment Contract").

     B. Section V of the Employment Contract provides certain measures and
protections for the Employee in the event of a change of control of the Company.

     C. The Company and the Employee have mutually determined that the Change of
Control Agreement used by the Company generally for its executive employees
should be modified and that an Amended and Restated Change of Control Agreement
should be entered into between the Company and the Employee.

     D. On even date herewith, the Company and the Employee have entered into an
Amended and Restated Change of Control Agreement.

     E. The Company and the Employee mutually desire to amend the Employment
Contract to delete Section V concerning change of control provisions which will
be replaced by the Amended and Restated Change of Control Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to this Amendment to Employment Agreement,
intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:

     1. Effective as of the date of this Amendment to Employment Agreement,
Section V of the Employment Contract concerning change of control, is deleted
and shall be of no further
<PAGE>

force and effect.

    2. In all other respects, the Employment Contract is ratified and affirmed
and shall continue in accordance with its terms.

    3. This Agreement shall be binding upon the successors, heirs, personal
representatives and assigns of each party.

                                   C-COR.net CORP.

                                By: /s/ James J. Tietjen
                                   ----------------------------------

                              Title: Chairman, Compensation Committee
                                    ---------------------------------

                                   THE EMPLOYEE:

                                   /s/ Richard E. Perry
                                   ----------------------------------
                                   Richard E. Perry

                                       2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Skeletal Muscle and Exercise Physiology Study Section, November 14, 2005, 8:30 a.m. to November 15, 2005, 4 p.m., Wyndham Washington, DC, 1400 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 1, 2005, 70 FR 65919-65922.                

The meeting will be held at the Marriott Crystal Hotel, 1999 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202. The meeting dates and time remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: November 4, 2005.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-22688 Filed 11-15-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Case 1:06-cv-14948-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### SCHAFRAN v. HARRIS

No. 87 PC.

Case below: 17 N.C. App. 500.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 12 July 1973.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1380 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1380

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to remind prosecutors 
           of their obligations under Supreme Court case law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Due Process Protections Act''.

SEC. 2. REMINDER OF PROSECUTORIAL OBLIGATIONS.

    Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following:
    ``(f) Reminder of Prosecutorial Obligation.--
            ``(1) In general.--In all criminal proceedings, on the 
        first scheduled court date when both prosecutor and defense 
        counsel are present, the judge shall issue an oral and written 
        order to prosecution and defense counsel that confirms the 
        disclosure obligation of the prosecutor under Brady v. 
        Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and the possible 
        consequences of violating such order under applicable law.
            ``(2) Formation of order.--Each judicial council in which a 
        district court is located shall promulgate a model order for 
        the purpose of paragraph (1) that the court may use as it 
        determines is appropriate.''.

            Passed the Senate May 20, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1380

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to remind prosecutors 
           of their obligations under Supreme Court case law.
```
# National Alzheimer's Disease Awareness Month, 2005

National Alzheimer's Disease Awareness Month is an opportunity to recognize the strength of family members, doctors, nurses, volunteers, and others who provide care for those living with this devastating disease. During this month, we also reaffirm our commitment to victims of this disease. We hope to enhance the quality of life for Alzheimer's patients and improve prevention and treatment.

Approximately 4.5 million Americans are affected by Alzheimer's disease. The disease gradually destroys parts of the brain that control memory, learning, communication, and reason. As it progresses, individuals may also experience changes in behavior and personality, leading to severely impaired cognitive abilities and the need for full-time care and assistance. Age remains the greatest risk factor—the National Institute on Aging estimates that the percentage of people who develop Alzheimer's disease doubles for each 5-year age group beyond 65. Alzheimer's affects nearly half of those over 85.

While there is no known cure or certain treatment, researchers are learning more about what causes this tragic disease and how to control its symptoms. My Administration remains committed to funding medical research programs to help prevent, treat, and find a cure for Alzheimer's disease. The National Institute on Aging has begun new initiatives to improve development and testing of medicines that may slow progression of the disease. The Department of Veterans Affairs is supporting research through its Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Centers, and the Administration on Aging is working to improve home and community-based services for Alzheimer's patients. By working together, we can learn more about treatment options and bring greater comfort to those afflicted with this disease.

Our Nation is grateful for the scientists, researchers, and health care professionals who are dedicated to treating Alzheimer's patients and finding a cure. We are also grateful for the hard work and compassionate spirit of family members and caregivers. Their efforts reflect the character and spirit of America.

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim November 2005 as National Alzheimer's Disease Awareness Month. I call upon all Americans to observe this month with appropriate programs and activities.                          ( print page 67640)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this third day of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth.

[FR Doc. 05-22298

Billing code 3195-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the Annual Report of Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 (the "Report"),
I, Michael J. McCann, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Petroleum Helicopters, Inc.


By: /s/ Michael J. McCann
    -----------------------------
    Michael J. McCann
    Chief Financial Officer
    March 15, 2004
#### STATE v. BRITT

No. 110 PC.

Case below: 8 N.C. App. 262.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 July 1970.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03 - 21 - 00079 - CR

Jose DeJesus Guel - Rivas, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 58060, THE HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On November 20 , 2006, i n tr ial

- court cause number 58060, a jury found appellant Jose DeJesus Guel

- Rivas g uilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child, see Tex. Penal Code § 22.021(a)(1)(B) , ( 2 ) (B) , and the trial court sentenced appellant to serve ninety years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 37.07(2)(b); Tex. Penal Code § 12.32. On direct appeal, this Court affirmed appellant’s conviction

. S ee Guel

- Rivas

v. State , No. 03

- 06

- 00762

- CR, 2 007 WL 4208341, at *4 (Tex. App.

— Austin Nov. 30, 2007, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not desig nated for publication) . T h e mandate affirming the trial court’s judgment of conviction was issued July 21, 2008

. 1

1 Appellant subsequently filed an application for postconviction writ of habeas corpus, see Tex. Code Crim Proc. art. 11.07, § 1, whi ch the Court of Crim in a l Appeals denied. See website of Court of Criminal Appeals, https://search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=WR

- 72,069

- 01&coa=coscca.2 On February 22, 2021, this Court received appellan t ’ s pro se notice of appeal

s eeking to appeal the judgment of conviction entered again st him in tr i a l

- court cause number 58060 . Appellant has already appealed his conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a chi ld, and mandate has issued. He is not enti tl e d to a second appeal of this conviction. See Hines

v. State , 70 S.W. 955, 957 (Tex. Crim. App. 1902) (“[O]nly one appeal can be made from a verdict and judgment of conviction in any case.”). Therefore, this C ourt lacks jurisdiction
to consider a secon d a ppeal from appellant’s final conviction. See McDonald v. State , 401 S.W.3d 360, 361

– 62 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 2013, pet. ref ’ d) ( concludi ng that court was without jurisdiction to entertain repeated attempts to appeal when defendant had already received
ap pe l late review of his co nviction ).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. 2 See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); see, e.g. , Wiggins v. State , No. 03

- 20

- 00401

- CR, 2020 WL 5884121, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin Sept. 29, 2020, pet. ref’d) (mem. op ., not designated for publication) (dismissing for want of jurisdiction defendant’s subsequent appeal of conviction that had previously been affirmed) ; Arabzadegan v. State , No. 03

- 19

- 00728

- CR, 2020 WL 370880, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin Jan. 23, 2020, pet. re f’ d ) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (same).

2 In connection with this attempted second appeal, appellant has filed several motions in this Court. All pending motions ar e d ismissed as moot.3 __________________________________________ Edward Smith , Justice Before Chie f Justice Byrn e, Justices Baker and Smith Dismissed for Want of Juri sdiction Filed: March 30, 2021 Do Not Publish
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service 

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Department of the Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Availability of Record of Decision on Final Environmental Impact Statement for General Management Plan, Boston Harbor Islands National Recreation Area. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Public Law 91-190, 83 Stat 852, as codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the National Park Service announces the availability of a record of decision on the abbreviated final environmental impact statement for the Boston Harbor Islands general management plan. On October 17, 2005 the Northeast Regional Director approved the Record of Decision for the project. The Record of Decision concludes the environmental analysis of the first general management for Boston Harbor Islands National Recreation Area and adopts the plan. The plan defines the park's mission and management direction and establishes a basic foundation for decision making in consultation with stakeholders. The primary action of the plan is to designate specific “management areas” for each area of the Boston Harbor Islands National Recreation Area. An extensive participatory process has characterized the development of the general management plan, including consultation with American Indian tribes. Implementation of the proposed general management plan would not result in the impairment of park resources and would enable the Boston Harbor Islands Partnership to protect park resources and provide for their enjoyment by visitors. The National Park Service commits to take all practicable measures to avoid or minimize environmental impacts that could result from implementation of the general management plan. 

Dated: October 17, 2005. 

Mary A. Bomar, 

Regional Director, Northeast Region. 

[FR Doc. 05-22530 Filed 11-10-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312-52-P
#### STATE v. CORBIN

No. 15 PC

Case below: 48 NC App 194

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 September 1980.
#### Hezekiah Bernard DRAYTON, Petitioner—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee.

No. 05-6052.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2005.

Decided March 15, 2005.

*481Hezekiah Bernard Drayton, Appellant pro se. William Kenneth Witherspoon, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAKLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Hezekiah B. Drayton appeals *from*the district court’s order denying his second motion for leave to file a petition for a certificate of appealability out of time. The district court previously denied relief on Drayton’s motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) and granted Drayton’s first motion for a thirty-day extension in which to note an appeal or request a certificate of appealability.

The time in which to note an appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional. *See Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (stating the appeal periods established by Rule 4 are mandatory and jurisdictional). Drayton had sixty days in which to note an appeal from the district court’s order entered on May 12, 2004, and the court granted an extension of an additional thirty days. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B). Drayton did not note an appeal or request a certificate of appealability within that time period.* Moreover, his second request for an extension of time in November 2004 was made outside the time permitted under Fed. RApp. P. 4(a)(5)(A). Accordingly, the district court did not err in denying Drayton an additional extension, and we affirm the district court’s order. *Drayton v. United States,*CA-03-3554 (D.S.C. Dec. 2, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal materials are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

*

 To the extent that Drayton seeks to appeal the district court's May 12, 2004 order, his notice of appeal is untimely.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF JACOBSON STORES INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES AS
OF, AND FOR THE THIRTEEN WEEK PERIOD ENDED, MAY 1, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ACCOMPANYING NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                              <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<CASH>                                                  2,645
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          31,142
<ALLOWANCES>                                              621
<INVENTORY>                                            91,925
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      131,109
<PP&E>                                                179,066
<DEPRECIATION>                                         94,947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        235,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  51,078
<BONDS>                                               100,356
<COMMON>                                                5,975
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                             67,606
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          235,352
<SALES>                                               113,959
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      113,959
<CGS>                                                  73,697
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          73,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      1,804
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         4,067
<INCOME-TAX>                                            1,423
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     2,644
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                            2,644
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.46


</TABLE>