U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                          Washington, DC 20549

                              FORM 10-KSB/A

(Mark One)
[x] Annual report under Section 13 or 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
    of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000

[ ] Transition report under section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934 for the transition period from _____________ to ____________.

Commission File Number: 0-10690

                        SCIENCE DYNAMICS CORPORATION
               (Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter)

                   DELAWARE                         22-2011859
    (State of Other Jurisdiction        (IRS Employer Identification Number)
     Incorporation or organization )

                           1919 Springdale Road
                    Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08003-1609
                 (Address of principal executive offices)

Issuer's telephone number: 856-424-0068

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

  Title of each Class                Name of each exchange on which registered
----------------------              -------------------------------------------
        None                                         N/A


Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

                     COMMON STOCK, $0.01 PAR VALUE
                          (Title of Class)

Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for past 90 days.
Yes [X]  No [ ]

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405
of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained,
to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any
amendment to this Form 10-KSB.  [X]

The issuer's revenues for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2000 were
$5,269,377.

As of September 5, 2001, the aggregate market value of the voting and
non-voting common stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the
registrant computed by reference to the average bid and asked price of
such common equity on that date was $1,369,599 million

As of September 5, 2001, the issuer had 17,657,901 outstanding shares of
Common Stock.

Transitional small business format  Yes ___    No  X

<PAGE>

PART I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS



GENERAL OVERVIEW
----------------

Science Dynamics Corporation (the "Company", "SciDyn" or "Science Dynamics")
was incorporated in the State of Delaware May 1973 and commenced operations
in July 1977.  During the past 23 years the Company has developed, designed
and marketed a variety of Telecommunications systems, including intelligent
call processing platforms, which provide telecommunications service
capabilities to the public switched telephone network (PSTN).  These
platforms are sophisticated software based systems, which satisfy a wide
range of computer telephony integration applications.  In November 1996, the
Company acquired the intellectual property of Innovative Communications
Technology (ICT) and embarked on transforming the Company into a
predominately software design and system integration company.

Over the past few years, the challenge was to expand the product offerings
and migrate into additional markets within the Computer Telephony
Integration (CTI) industry.  The Company believes that communicating via
packet networks such as ATM, Frame Relay and the Internet is becoming the
preferred strategy for both public networks and business enterprises. The
Company's focus is to address niche market opportunities in Data Network
Companies, Telephone Service Distributors and Regional Bell Operating
Companies (RBOC's), and large independent telephone operating companies.

The Company's development is driven by user needs for cost effective, easy
to use, multi-service products that provide an array of telecommunications
solutions and services to the customers. These opportunities are primarily
in the areas of Voice over Internet Protocol ("VoIP"), Inmate Systems, Video
over Frame Relay, Voice Announcements, Interactive Communications,
Intelligent Network Control, and Administration.  The Company's strategy
today is to deliver quality software products and services that empower its
customers to improve their applications and deploy quality services
worldwide.


BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
--------------------

Science Dynamics is continuing to focus it's strategy on becoming a key
provider of enabling technologies required for the convergence of
traditional and new communications media infrastructures.

The telecommunications industry continues to move forward with the shifting
of traditional circuit-switched traffic such as voice and fax to new packet-
based networks.  The market for products and technology needed to enable the
shift of these established services to lower cost and more advanced data
networks has dampened in recent quarters, with general consensus that the
telecom capital expenditure rate will be weak until the second half of 2001.
 It will take many years to displace a major portion of the currently
installed circuit-switched infrastructure.  This provides two major
challenges in the next few years.  First a need to bridge the old circuit-
switched networks with newer packet-based networks.  This challenge demands
high quality dependable gateway equipment and services.  Second new emerging
carriers building from the ground up on these advanced packet-based networks
require equipment that can help them offer the services and features that
are currently deployed in the existing circuit-switched networks.  Certainly
the deciding factor will be up to the public and corporate users of these
networks.  Traditional telecom carriers are currently in an intense battle
to keep customers and prevent costly churning of user accounts.  Offering
more advanced features with realizable benefits to the end user is the key
to winning this battle.  This will hold true as packet-based network
providers attempt to lure customers to their new technology.  One key factor
here is the ability to provide new features at a faster pace then
competition. Packet based networks and much of the technology supporting
these networks relies more heavily on software driven systems. These systems
along with the inherent ability of these networks to overcome distance and
access obstacles means a greater ability to provide features quickly and
more creatively then ever before.

-2-
<PAGE>


Management believes that current products and development strategy teamed
with SciDyn's strong telecommunications background will provide a solid
product to penetrate niche markets and provide VoIP solutions that will
drive out fixed and operational costs for their clients thus increasing
profitability in the very competitive telecom space.

PRODUCTS
--------

IP Telephony

One of the current impacts of IP Telephony is the way it is driving the
convergence of the IT and telecom markets.  Both of these traditional
markets are now seeing a paradigm shift to IP Telephony.  IP Telephony is
crossing traditional parameters and amalgamating historically separated
disciplines on an IP network.  This means the carriers and companies of the
world are starting to send voice over the packet networks that previously
were used only for data.   This is an opportunity for dynamic companies to
take their experience and expertise and apply it in markets not
traditionally open to them.

By crossing borders, IP Telephony allows companies like Science Dynamics to
diversify from their traditional core technology and enhance and develop
bridges between the existing data and telecom infrastructures.

The difference between the current circuit-switched PSTN, which provides a
dedicated end-to-end connection, and the packet switched IP network, which
provides a virtual connection, is the enhancement of bandwidth utilization.
 By sharing bandwidth as data networks do, new operators should have the
potential to provide a reduction in cost as compared to traditional circuit-
switched PSTN operators.  The focus in today's market is to integrate these
two very different forms of communication throughout the world.

SciDyn's IP Telephony products aim to enhance the new operators' abilities to
combine the technologies of the new IP-based networks with the traditional
feature-rich circuit networks without forfeiting the key functionality of IP
network-adaptability.

The SciDyn system features a modular architecture that permits our customers
to add new product and service features without significant cost or
development time. Based on publicly available data provided by large
telecommunications service providers, we believe our modular architecture
enables the provision of new and existing communications services at a lower
cost than the provision of communications services by traditional telephone
companies. The IP Integrator gateway product line addresses the various
market segments.  The IntegratorC-2100(R) Series focus is corporate
enterprises, the IntegratorC-2300(R) Series focus is large ISPs and Telco
Carriers and the IntergratorC-2500(R) Series focus is intended to address the
needs of PTT/Telco Carriers.

SciDyn offers its proprietary BubbleLink(R) software architecture throughout
its current IP Telephony Gateway product line. This includes our high
capacity versatile IntegratorC-2308(R), which has one of the smallest
footprints in the industry.

Commander Inmate Telephone Control System (ITCS)

The Commander product lines are built on the Company's unique BubbleLINK(R)
software architecture.  This open system platform is a combination of
integrated Computer Telephony (CTI) hardware and software, which can handle
thousands of call transactions per hour and provide correctional facility
officials with effective tools to manage and control inmate telephone calls
using the Commander system software.

The Commander I products are designed for the small to mid sized municipal
and county correctional facilities requiring control for up to 40 inmate
telephone lines.  The Commander I base system provides telephone control for
4 lines and can be expanded in 4 line increments. This modular design
provides a cost effective solution with an abundance of inmate phone control
features.

-3-
<PAGE>

SciDyn has recently introduced its VoIP technology to its Commander call
control system.  This enhancement reduces the hardware and operation costs
of running the SciDyn solution.  The new configuration allows all of
SciDyn's technology to be housed at one central location reducing the amount
of lines that SciDyn clients will have to use in order to move the same
traffic, moreover, the VoIP component allows for a reduction in the per
minute charges incurred by our client which enhances profitability.

The Commander I and II call control systems can be configured using one or
more AdminManager workstations. The AdminManager provides real-time
administration of the Commander through an Ethernet Local Area Network (LAN)
or a Wide Area Network (WAN).

In 1999, the company released a new Commander II AdminManager software
module. This new software module provides the Commander II with a
sophisticated Graphical User Interface (GUI) with new inmate phone control
features. These new features were based on recommendations by several of the
Company's customers. The Company expects to complete the Commander II
Integrated Recording and Inmate debit systems by the end of the second
quarter 2001. The Company continues to explore opportunities with the major
telephone companies in providing the Commander II inmate phone control
system with call transaction (price per call) programs.


Video over Frame Relay

In 1997, SciDyn launched its new way to carry video conferencing.  The VFX-
250S is a hardware based Frame Relay Access Device (FRAD) designed to carry
video streams through the frame relay network.  As the largest data network
protocol in the world, frame relay seemed an obvious choice for adding video
connectivity to its wide complement of features.

Traditionally, video conferencing has been carried via leased lines or ISDN
circuits.  In the US market, due to the proliferation of ISDN availability,
video conferencing has been able to take off with a relatively high growth
curve.  This is not true in the international markets where leased lines and
ISDN circuits are either not readily available or prove to be rather costly.
 Video conferencing suite manufacturers such as PictureTel, the industry
leader, found markets outside of ISDN enabled networks have proven to be
slow and tedious.

By leveraging the proliferation of frame relay networks throughout the
world, SciDyn intends to market the VFX-250S products in markets where ISDN
and leased line services are not available.  This has proven very successful
in the past in markets such as Brazil.

Three countrywide frame relay networks are presently under construction in
China. Trials are continuing and we continue to anticipate possible business
opportunities in the mid part of 2001.

Sales of the VFX-250S have been slow throughout 2000.   There are a number
of large-scale projects quoted late last year, which have not yet been
awarded.  These include opportunities in China and Russia.  Brazil continues
to proceed steadily and is anticipated to provide sales. With some expected
further development of the VFX family and some investment in the promotion
of the product line we continue to anticipate an overall increase in sales
over the next twelve months.

-4-
<PAGE>

Error Correction Algorithm

In 1999, the Company acquired the "Error Detection and Correction System for
Use with Address Translation Memory Controller" patent, in exchange for
172,029 shares of common stock then valued at $100,000.  Such a patent
provides the Company with the ability to embed in certain technology an
error correction method that should substantially reduce data transmission
errors.  This correction device is designed to reduce costly retransmission
and can be utilized across various data transport mediums.

The patent, which we intend to make available to others on a royalty basis,
can be utilized on virtually any data transmitting system, from fiber optics
to satellite transmission.  Since both transmitting and receiving stations
must utilize the same algorithm, the Company's primary task is to initially
convince new or redesigned applications to utilize SciDyn's patent for each
end of the application.  As stated in previous quarterly reports SciDyn
continues to pursue a third party to undertake the implementation of this
algorithm.  To date a suitable entity has not been identified to exploit
this new technology in the near term.  Since SciDyn's near term strategy and
capital priorities preclude it from investing additional time and funds into
exploiting this patent independently, its carrying value of $89,700 has been
written off.  SciDyn believes that the underlying patent may still have
practical applications and is pursuing the outright sale of the patent to
interested third parties.

The Patent, which has been issued in the United States with application in
many foreign countries, is for a data transmission system for use in a mass
memory system, which includes an EDAC that corrects all single component
errors and detects all double component errors.  High-speed operation
permits use of the EDAC on address and control lines as well as on data
lines.  In memory systems, which use virtual memory addressing, further
efficiency and economy is achieved by incorporating a partial implementation
of the EDAC encoding in the same virtual memory address translation unit in
which the virtual memory address is calculated.

At the present time there is one issued patent. There are many upgrades to
the patented material that can be patented, which are now trade secrets.
These include both revisions to the algorithm and implementation approaches.

Voice Response System

The Company's Voice Response System (VRS) is an automatic intercept product
designed to provide a cost-effective solution for implementing announcement
capabilities at the central office location.  This product has reached its
mature stage of the product life cycle and has been discontinued.  A base
line revenue stream will be generated from support of this product.

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
-------------------

The Company's products have primarily been designed and developed by its
internal engineering staff.   The Company considers the features and
performance of its products to be generally competitive to those of other
available applications.

We believe that continual enhancements of our products will be required to
enable the Company to maintain its competitive position. The Company intends
to focus its principal future product development efforts on developing new,
innovative, technical products and updating existing products in the
communications arena to enable the Company to take advantage of
opportunities resulting from the expected direction of technology.

The Company continues to refine its core BubbleLINK(R) software architecture.
 This software architecture provides the foundation for hosting applications
for various Telephony and transaction oriented processes.  Currently the
BubbleLINK(R) architecture supports existing Company products such as the
Commander family of inmate products, and the IntegratorC-2000(R) Series of IP
Telephony gateway products.  Management believes that the product design
strategy will keep the Company competitive in the emerging Internet
Telephony market.


-5-
<PAGE>

INTEGRATION OF PRODUCTS
-----------------------

The Company's primary effort is the software design of products, limited
hardware design and system integration of purchased products.  The Company
purchases OEM equipment then integrates its custom software providing
quality solutions for the industry.  The purchasing philosophy has been to
establish relationships with industry leaders in the Networking, Telecom,
and PC environments providing quality modules and sub-systems and prompt
delivery and service.

Crystal Group, Inc. has been selected as the hardware integration source for
SciDyn's entire range of IP Telephony gateways.  Crystal Group's CS900
computer chassis provides the Carrier Class high-level quality of hardware
and integration services required by SciDyn for their VoIP infrastructure.
 By integrating SciDyn products with Crystal Group's hardware platform, the
two companies will be capable of a high level of service and support to
telecommunications companies worldwide.


SOURCES AND AVAILABILITY OF MATERIAL
------------------------------------

Although most materials are available from a number of different suppliers on
an off-the-shelf basis, several suppliers are the sole source of each of
certain components.  If a supplier should cease to deliver a component,
another source would have to be developed.  The Company believes it would be
able to do so by acquiring a substitute part or module that could require a
hardware or software change in the unit in order to provide satisfactory
performance, although added costs and delays of unknown amount and duration
could be experienced.


SALES AND MARKETING
-------------------

The Company has significantly increased its sales and marketing staff,
launched new web initiatives and implemented a complete sales automation
process.  This has increased the Company's efficiency and effectiveness to
evaluate a significant number of opportunities generated from web inquiries,
trade shows, press releases, and partner relationships.  The end result of
these actions is a robust sales funnel and diversification of customer base,
thereby limiting the business risk of only having several key customers.

In addition, the Company has undertaken a new marketing initiative to brand
SciDyn as the de-facto standard of reliability for new telecommunication
applications.  This is further reinforced by the Company's 23-year
reputation for delivering specialized, high quality solutions.  Independent
of the new marketing effort, the Company has also seen an increased number
of legacy customer inquiries for new releases, upgrades, and special
projects.  This is a direct indication of the market trend from the old
circuit-switched mindset to the new packet-switched paradigm.  The Company
feels it is well positioned to take advantage of this trend and capitalize
on its overall intellectual property portfolio and industry expertise.

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
----------------------

The majority of the research and development activities are conducted at the
Company's facility using its array of telephony resources and the technical
expertise of its engineering staff.  The Company has fourteen employees
currently engaged in engineering and research and development. The Company
plans to devote a substantial portion of its resources to research and
development and to continue utilizing subcontractors to enhance the
engineering staff.

We anticipate that an increase in future research and development
expenditures will be necessary to remain competitive in the rapidly changing
telecommunications industry and that more development work will be
outsourced to accelerate the introduction of new product offerings.

-6-
<PAGE>

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
---------------------

It is the Company's practice to apply for patents as new products or
processes appropriate for patent protection as developed.  The Company made
application for a patent on the three-way Call Detection System and on
January 21, 1998, received a Notice of Allowance from the U.S. Patent
Office.  The formal United States Patent was received in June 1998.  The
Company holds other patents related to some of its other products. No
assurance can be given as to the scope of the patent protection.

We believe that the rapid technological developments in the
telecommunications industry may limit the protection afforded by patents.
Since a patent generally defines what and how to competitors, that
information often allows mutations by rivals to circumvent the original
patent. Accordingly, we believe that our success will be dependent upon our
engineering competence, service, and the quality and economic value of our
products.

The Company also owns trademarks, copyrighted material and intellectual
property relating to proprietary technology utilized in the development of
some of the products.


CUSTOMER SUPPORT
----------------

The Company's technical support staff provides telephone support to our
customers using a computerized call tracking and problem reporting system.
The Company also provides initial installation and training for its
products.  The Company has instituted an annual maintenance contract
entitling customers to software updates, technical support and technical
bulletins.


INDUSTRY
--------

The overall growth in the telecommunications sector including equipment and
services generated over $609 billion last year growing by more than 12.5
percent over the previous year.  According to the Telecommunications
Industry Association (TIA), growth in telecommunication equipment sales
reached double digits again, outperforming last year by over 13 percent,
reaching in excess of $160 billion in sales.

The United Nation's International Telecommunications Union (ITU) research
has found that within the Organization of Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) member states competition has progressed further than
others in allowing competition within their national markets.  Based on
telecommunication revenues, 96 percent of the market was open to
unrestricted competition.  Liberalization continues to accelerate throughout
the world, increasing competition and fueling the double-digit growth in the
equipment supplier market.

According to TIA, over the 2000-2004 period, spending in the US
telecommunications industry will continue its double-digit growth at a
projected rate of 12%.  International telecommunications spending, including
the export of professional services will total an estimate of $2.1 trillion
in 2004.

Although it has been possible to transmit voice over Internet-Protocol, or
IP, data networks since 1995, only recently has the technology improved such
that phone-to-phone calls can be transmitted over data networks with quality
approaching that of traditional voice networks. In addition, International
Data Corporation projects that worldwide Internet telephony will grow from
$0.5 billion in 1999, to $18.7 billion in 2004, approximately half of which
would be generated by new services, including voice-enabled e-commerce and
other enhanced services. International Data Corporation estimates that
revenues from unified communications services will grow to $5.7 billion in
2004. Many telecommunications carriers are realizing the need to offer
enhanced services to their customers in an effort to reduce customer
turnover and increase the minutes of voice traffic carried on their network.
We believe it has become increasingly important for telecommunications
carriers to offer more than just network infrastructure. Using Internet
telephony to complete calls offers communications service providers
comparable quality call completion along with the ability to offer new
enhanced services.

-7-
<PAGE>


Despite the anticipated growth of the telecommunications industry over the
next five years, recent economic conditions have significantly weakened the
demand for telecommunications equipment.  The length and breadth of this
downturn will determine our performance in the coming year.  We believe that
the second half of 2001 will provide the bulk of our activity for the year.

COMPETITION
-----------

Due to the nature of the IP telephony market, we recognize that we have
chosen to address a highly competitive market place.  The competition
continues to grow considerably with over 100 gateway products presently
offered in the market place.  The majority of those competing in the
industry today trace their roots back to the data world.  With their
traditional focus on data networking, the competition has found difficulty
in meeting all of the telecommunication requirements the new and existing
operators have for operating a full network.  Conversely, SciDyn has
attacked the market with its twenty-three years of telecom experience.

Companies like Clarent have begun to address these issues.  They are
increasing port densities and providing the types of services traditional
telcos offer.  On the other side, Nortel and Lucent have bought data
networking expertise with the purchase of Bay Networks and Ascend
respectively and continue adapting their telecommunications know how to the
new technologies.

With the introduction of the large players like Lucent and Nortel, price per
port becomes a major market driver.  Cisco, known in the industry for
creative financing packages also pushes the price envelope by providing pay
as you grow funding for new carriers.

The Commander marketplace has significant competition, however, the
introduction of our VoIP technology to the Commander call control series has
the potential to change the way future inmate networks are configured and
implemented.  SciDyn is forging new alliances in this area and believes that
it can provide a feature rich and completely VoIP solution to a niche market
in which SciDyn is very familiar.  If successful, these feature rich VoIP
solutions can be rolled out to other vertical markets.  This is significant,
in that, SciDyn's VoIP technology is not just transferring minutes but
actually providing turn key cost effective solutions to its customers,
thereby, harnessing the true value of packet-based communication, that is,
providing the most cost efficient way of delivering feature rich solutions.

The video over frame relay market has little direct competition.  Rather, it
must address the alternative solutions such as ISDN availability within the
international markets.  The proliferation of ISDN has been a major driver
within the US market and has forced the Company to focus primarily on the
international market where frame relay is far more prolific.

CUSTOMERS
---------

During 2000, two customers accounted for 83% and 15% of total sales. With the
introduction of the new product lines and the expansion of the sales team
from two to 10 people, SciDyn anticipates less reliance on any single
customer or market in the future.

EMPLOYEES
---------

As of March 21, 2001, the Company employed 37 persons on a full time basis.
 The Company supplements full-time employees with subcontractors and part-
time individuals, consistent with workload requirements.   The Company's
continued success depends heavily upon its ability to retain highly
qualified and competent personnel. The Company is operating in a high growth
industry, which is experiencing fierce competition for experienced and
talented personnel.  The Company continues to provide its employees with
appropriate equity-linked incentives to advance the interests of the Company
and its stockholders.


-8-
<PAGE>


GOVERNMENT APPROVAL
-------------------

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requires that some of the
Company's products meet Part 15 and Part 68 of the code of Federal
Regulations (CFR).  Part 15 (subpart B) deals with the suppression of radio
frequency and electro-magnetic radiation to specified levels.  Part 68 deals
with protection of the telephone network.  Other than FCC requirements, there
is no known Company effect resulting from existing or probable Government
regulations requiring approval.

COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS
----------------------------------

Company operations do not pollute nor involve discharge of material into the
environment.  As a result, no expenditure is budgeted or required for
environment protection or restoration.  The Company is concerned about
protecting the environment and participates in recycling programs.

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

The Company has leased for ten years commencing May 1, 1995, a 50,000 square
foot freestanding masonry building in an industrial park in Cherry Hill, New
Jersey, utilized for office space and testing of its products and other
corporate activities.  In the latter part of 1998, the Company subleased
25,645 square feet of the building to a printed circuit board manufacturer.
  Such sublease is currently in default, and the Company has engaged legal
counsel who has filed a complaint to evict such tenant.  Such tenant is
currently in negotiations with the Company to cure such default and reinstate
the sublease.


ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is not now a party to any litigation and no action against the
Company has been threatened or is known to be contemplated by any
governmental agency or subdivision or any other entity.



ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matter was submitted during the Fourth Quarter of the Fiscal Year covered
by this report, to a vote of security holders through solicitation of proxies
or otherwise.


-9-
<PAGE>


PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The Registrant's Common Stock resumed being traded on the Nasdaq Small
Cap(SM) Market effective September 20, 2000.   The symbol for the Company's
Common Stock is "SIDY".  The Company's Common Stock has been traded publicly
since April 22, 1981.  The "high" and "low" bid quotations for the Company's
Common Stock for each quarterly period for the fiscal years ended December
31, 1999 and December 31, 2000 were as follows:

 Calendar Quarter          High Bid Price            Low Bid Price
 ----------------          --------------            -------------

    1999
    ----
    First                        $.88                     $.38
    Second                        .91                      .69
    Third                        1.47                      .75
    Fourth                       6.00                     1.19


    2000
    ----
    First                      $21.00                    $5.00
    Second                      14.25                     7.50
    Third                       10.88                     6.88
    Fourth                      10.38                      .75


The above listed quotes reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up,
markdown, or commissions and are not necessarily representations of actual
transactions or the true value of the Common Stock.

As of December 31, 2000, there were approximately 350 holders of record of
the Common Stock of the Company.  However, registrant has reason to believe
that there are more than 850 shareholders because of stock held in street
name by various broker-dealers.

The Company has paid no cash dividends since its inception.  The Company
presently intends to retain any future earnings for use in its business and
does not presently intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Holders of the Common stock are entitled to share ratably in dividends when
and as declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available
therefore.

The market price of the Company's common stock, like that of other
technology companies, is highly volatile and is subject to fluctuations in
response to variations in operating results, announcements of technological
innovations or new products by the Company, or other events or factors. The
Company's stock price may also be affected by broader market trends
unrelated to the Company's performance.


-10-
<PAGE>


ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
        RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

GENERAL BUSINESS OVERVIEW
-------------------------

Overview

In 1998, management made a strategic decision to divert most of our
development efforts towards the IP system.  Advances in public and private
IP-based networks now enable businesses to use the Internet Protocol  to by-
pass the Public Switched Telephone Network for national and international
long distance voice, fax, and video communications.


We continue to gain knowledge and experience in enhancing the development of
the system for IP Telephony.  We have revised our  development and
implementation of the products according to the direction of the
marketplace.  Management believes that the penetration of the IP Telephony
market along with renewed interest and development in the Commander II call
control series will provide significant growth potential.

During the year, we changed the size and structure of our sales force.  The
sales team has increased from two UK based sales people in 1999 to a 10-
person team (8 in the US and 2 in the UK) led by our new Vice President of
Sales and Marketing.  This team was fully in place by October 2000.  Given
typical sales lead times and the current state of the Telco market, we do
not anticipate significant revenues to be generated by the new team until
the second half of 2001.


Our net sales results for the year ended December 31, 2000 were $5,269,377,
an increase of $2,921,393 from sales of $2,347,984 for the year ended
December 31, 1999. Our  revenue in 2000 was predominantly derived from
the Integrator Product Line.  The results were largely due to the beginning
of the deployment of the Cascadent supply agreement during 2000.  This
agreement provided $4,370,520 in revenue for the year 2000. This agreement
was terminated upon our receipt of official word that Cascadent was placed
into receivership.  Our former president, chief executive officer and
chairman of the board, Alan Bashforth, became president of Cascadent
subsequent to his service as an officer of Science Dynamics.  Mr. Bashforth
continues to serve as a member of our board of directors.

The strategy for 2001 is to generate sales revenue from the IP system via
the efforts of our expanded sales team and to reinvigorate the Commander I
and II product lines, as well as, to exploit the VFX-250S product. Although
the sales of the VFX-250S did not reach the anticipated level, the market
awareness of the functionality and quality of the product has been
recognized.  The sales for this product, while immaterial to total revenues,
have been primarily in South America, with future sales opportunities
generating from China and Russia.  All sales made outside of the United
States are denominated in US dollars, so currency fluctuations are not a
factor.

We are continuously exploring new niche opportunities, introducing new
product offerings and marketing and sales initiatives to increase market
share and value for our customers.  The focus of our strategy included
providing the core technology needed  to deliver a broad range of telephony
services; targeting key growth markets worldwide; promoting strategic
relationships between our customers; delivering added value through customer
support and services; and continuing to actively pursue business alliance
candidates that complement or support our core competencies.

-11-
<PAGE>

Subsequent Events

On March 15, 2001, the Company signed an agreement to receive up to $40
million in equity financing from Alpha Venture Capital Inc., a member of the
Alpha Group of Funds.  The Alpha Group is a $750 million private equity fund
specializing in providing financing to emerging small-cap and mid-cap
companies in domestic and global markets.

Under the terms of the equity line agreement, SciDyn will have the right to
sell up to $40 million of its common stock to Alpha Venture Capital Inc.
SciDyn has sole discretion, subject to certain volume limitations and
conditions, to draw down upon such funds as its capital needs dictate.  The
stock will be sold at a maximum discount of ten percent of the average
closing bid price at the time of each sale.  In connection with such
financing, Alpha Venture Capital Inc. has been issued warrants to purchase
500,000 shares of SciDyn's common stock at an exercise price of five dollars
per share.  Additional warrants to purchase up to 500,000 shares of SciDyn
common stock at exercise prices equal to the current bid price will be
issued on a pro rata basis at the time of each sale.  The term of the equity
line is for eight months with an automatic one-year extension if at least
ten percent or $4 million is drawn down during the initial eight-month
period.

The equity financing draw downs are subject to a limit of 300 percent of the
"Average Daily Trading Volume", defined as the dollar amount of the average
daily trading volume of shares of the Company's common stock, calculated
based upon the average bid price and average daily trading volume traded over
the twenty trading days preceding multiple put dates.  As such, SciDyn's
ability to access these funds in sufficient amounts will be directly related
to the average daily trading volume as defined.  The agreement contains other
provisions, which may have the potential to limit SciDyn's ability to draw
down funds.  The agreement can be accessed in its entirety as an exhibit to
an 8-K filing made with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Company plans to use the proceeds for research and development as well
as for other general corporate purposes, and is available for potential
acquisitions and investments in complementary businesses, products, or
technologies.

Funding under the agreement is also subject to completion of certain terms
and conditions, including the filing of a registration statement with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.  No public offering of the Company's
common stock will be made except by means of a prospectus under an effective
registration statement.

The Company is currently negotiating a necessary bridge loan to subsidize
its working capital needs for the period preceding the effective date of the
registration statement.  Management cannot give assurance as to the success
of this effort, but believes that negotiations to date have been promising.


-12-
<PAGE>


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
---------------------

The following table sets forth income and certain expense items as a
percentage of total revenue and the change in dollar amounts of such items
compared to the previous fiscal year:


                            For the Years Ending December 31,
                                     2000               1999
                                     ----               ----

Sales                          $5,269,377         $2,347,984

Net Loss                      $(1,339,262)      $(2,054,886)

Net Loss Per Share                 $(0.08)           $(0.12)


                                OPERATING EXPENSES        PERCENT OF SALES
                                ------------------        ----------------
                                2000          1999        2000        1999
                                ----          ----        ----        ----

Cost of Goods Sold          $1,891,484  $1,330,886        35.9%       56.7%

Research & Development       1,141,656   1,331,521        21.7%       56.7%

Selling, General & Admin     3,605,768   1,728,244        68.4%       73.6%

Total Operating Costs
and Expenses                $6,638,908  $4,390,651       126.0%      187.0%



 Sales for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 were $5,269,377
compared to sales of $2,347,984 in the 1999 fiscal year.  The sales revenue
consists of sales primarily of our Integrator and Commander products, as
well as revenue generated from the maintenance and support of those products.
The primary factor that affected the increased sales performance was
initiation of the roll out of the Cascadent supply agreement, which provided
$4,370,520 of sales for the year.  In the fourth quarter, at the request of
Cascadent, we did not supply any further products to them.  The
unanticipated lack of revenue from Cascadent led to a loss of $1,693,774 in
the fourth quarter of 2000.  We  committed our resources to the continual
research and development of the IP Telephony Integrator gateway product.
Management believes the effect of this strategy, as well as, the
introduction of IP technology to its existing Commander call control product
will provide changes in the composition of our customer base resulting in
sales growth, customer advantage, and ultimately increased shareholder
value.

     Sales of our Integrator product in 2000 were $4,370,520 or 83% of total
revenue compared to zero in 1999, as the product was introduced in 2000.
Sales of the Commander product in 2000 were $507,989 or 10% of total revenue
compared to $1,024,098 or 44% of total revenue in 1999, this decrease was
due to decreased sales to Bell South during 2000 and our emphasis on
promoting our Voice over internet protocol solutions.  Sales of our VFX
product in 2000 were $116,235 or 2.2% of total revenue compared to $360,024
or 15% of total revenue in 1999.  This decrease is due to an unusually large
sale of $250,000 in 1999 to a Brazilian  company.

     Maintenance and support is billed hourly at varying rates per hour
depending on the expertise of the technician required to resolve the issue.
 In addition, any equipment needed to resolve a problem is also billed to
the client.   There were no maintenance contracts in place during 2000 or
1999, nor is maintenance and support included in our software license.
Maintenance revenues for 2000 and 1999 were $58,046 and $138,282,
respectively. Equipment sales related to maintenance for 2000 and 1999 were
$41,407 and $399,752, respectively.

-13-
<PAGE>

Cost of Goods Sold decreased 20.8% as a percentage of sales from 56.7% for
the year ended December 1999 to 35.9% for the year ended December 2000.
This decrease is related to the difference in the sales mix in the year
2000, with higher margin Integrator gateway sales replacing lower margin
Commander call control sales.

Research and Development expenses decreased from  $1,331,521 in 1999 to
$1,141,656 in 2000, a decrease of $189,865.  Research and development
expenses consist of payroll and related expenses for research and
development personnel, costs related to systems infrastructure and
expenses for testing facilities and equipment.  The dollar decreases in
research and development expenses were attributable to an increase and
reallocation of the number of research and development personnel and
expenses related to establishing a new testing facility during 1999.
We believe that the research and development activities are crucial to
maintaining a competitive edge in the rapid growth of the
telecommunications marketplace.  We expect to continue to make substantial
investments in the research and development team to maintain a highly
skilled force of design engineers for new product development, the key
to the future.


 Selling, general and administration expenses decreased to 68.4% as a
percentage of sales in 2000 to $3,605,768 as compared to $1,728,244 or 73.6%
as a percentage of sales in 1999.  Sales and marketing expenses consist
primarily of compensation and related costs for sales personnel, marketing
personnel, sales commissions, marketing programs, public relations,
promotional materials, travel expenses and trade show exhibit expenses.
This decrease on a percentage basis is due to the significant increase in
sales during 2000.  The actual dollar increase of $1,877,524 is attributed
to the addition of eight sales and marketing personnel along with increased
trade show and advertising activity during 2000. We expect to incur
substantial expenditures related to sales and marketing activities, the
recruitment of additional sales and marketing personnel, and the expansion
of our domestic and international distribution channels.

Sales, General and  Administration increased nearly $612,000 during the
fourth quarter of 2000 over the third quarter of  2000.  This increase was
due to the following: write-off of bad debt of $151,560, the write-off of
the forward error correction patent in the amount of $89,700, an increase in
sales and marketing expenses mainly salaries and tradeshows in the amount of
$145,000, an increase in consulting of $92,224, an increase in employment
placement fees of $65,000, and the write-off of obsolete inventory in the
amount of $65,078, these increases were offset by immaterial fluctuations in
other areas.

Bad debts for the year were $151,559.  As a result of the Cascadent issue,
we wrote off $100,159 in receivables, the receiver recently informed us that
it is unlikely that we will recover any of this amount.  We also reserved
an amount of $51,400 against a receivable due from a sub-tenant, Pro-
Circuits, Inc.  Science Dynamics has recently entered into a payment
agreement with the sub-tenant and believe that the amount is probable of
collection.  There were no bad debt write offs in 1999.


LIQUIDITY & CAPITAL RESOURCES
-----------------------------

 Net cash used for operating activities for the years ended December 31,
2000 and 1999 was $628,040 and $874,925 respectively.  The use of cash in
operating activities in 2000 resulted primarily from the net loss of
$1,339,262 and a decrease in accounts payable of $163,207, offset by
decreases in accounts receivable of $54,846, inventory of $273,416, and
other assets of $108,413.

Net cash used in investing activities was $704,246 in 2000 and $123,555 in
1999. The increase in cash used for investing activities in 2000 was
primarily attributable to capital expenditures for the purchase of computers
and software for development of our current and new products and for
leasehold improvements. We expect to increase its capital expenditures to
maximize development efforts of our new products and applications as
necessary.  We had no significant commitments as of December 31, 2000 for
capital expenditures.

-14-
<PAGE>

Net cash provided by financing activities was $2,009,134 for the year ended
December 31, 2000.   This amount is related to the sale of 200,650 common
shares at $8.50 per share which netted $1,570,149, the finders fee from this
transaction included the issuance of 13,115 warrants to purchase common
shares.  The remaining increase in financing activities of $438,985 was
related to the exercise of stock options by our employees, the sale of net
operating losses, offset by the payment on the capitalized lease.

At December 31, 2000, the Company had $1,351,641 in cash and cash equivalents
and $1,142,948 in working capital, compared with  $674,793 in cash and cash
equivalents and $666,648 in working capital at December 31, 1999. Current
liabilities at December 31, 2000 were $534,477, compared to 640,086 at
December 31, 1999.   The increase in the cash and cash equivalents and the
working capital for the year ended December 31, 2000 are attributable to the
proceeds derived from the private placements.  The decrease in the current
liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2000 resulted from the reduction
in overall sales activity during the 4th quarter of 2000.

The Company is currently negotiating a necessary bridge loan to subsidize its
working capital needs for the period preceding the effective date of the
registration statement related to the $40 million Equity line of credit.
Management cannot give assurance as to the success of this effort, but
believes that negotiations to date have been promising.

Although we have no material commitments for capital expenditures,
management anticipates a substantial increase in the need for working
capital and capital expenditures consistent with our anticipated growth
plan.  By means of the growth plan, we seek to retain the services of
persons who are now employees and consultants, to secure and retain the
services of new employees and/or consultants as needed and to provide
incentives for such persons to exert maximum efforts for the success of
Science Dynamics. The amounts and timing of these expenditures will vary
depending on a number of factors, including the amount of cash generated
by our operations, competitive and technological developments and the
rate of growth of our business.

-15-
<PAGE>


Forward Looking Statements
--------------------------

The Company is making this statement in order to satisfy the "safe harbor"
provisions contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995.

This Form 10-KSB includes forward-looking statements relating to the
business of the Company.  Forward-looking statements contained herein or in
other statements made by the Company are made based on management's
expectations and beliefs concerning future events impacting the Company and
are subject to uncertainties and factors relating to the Company's
operations and business environment, all of which are difficult to predict
and many of which are beyond the control of the Company, that could cause
actual results of the Company to differ materially from those matters
expressed in or implied by forward-looking statements.  The Company believes
that the  following factors, among others, could affect its future
performance and cause actual results of the Company to differ materially
from those expressed in or implied by forward-looking statements made by or
on behalf of the Company:  (a) the effect of technological changes; (b)
increases in or unexpected losses; (c) increased competition; (d)
fluctuations in the costs to operate the business; (e) uninsurable risks;
and (f) general economic conditions.


ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Financial Statements are listed at "Index to Consolidated Financial
Statements".


ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
        FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There were no disputes or disagreements of any nature between the Company or
its management and its public auditors with respect to any aspect of
accounting or financial disclosure.

PART III

ITEM 9.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS;
         COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

The directors and executive officers of the registrant were:


  Name                        Age        Position with the Company
  ----                        ---        -------------------------

  Sheldon Hofferman           56         Chairman of the Board since
                                         November 30, 2000 and Director
                                         since September 17, 1997

  Joy C. Hartman              52         President and Chief Executive
                                         Officer since January 28, 2000,
                                         and Director since May 7, 1991

  Kenneth P. Ray              67         Director since May, 1990

  Alan C. Bashforth           51         Director since November 7, 1996

  Anand Kumar                 55         Director from July 1999 to
                                         January 2001

  John Innes                  68         Director since October 12, 2000

  L. Michael  Hone            50         Director since October 12, 2000

  Louis Padulo                64         Director since January 17, 2001

  James L. Koley              70         Director since January 17, 2001

  Robert O'Connor             39         Vice President of Finance and
                                         Administration since May 15, 2000

  Joseph Giegerich            34         Vice President of Sales and
                                         Marketing since October 10, 2000

  Thomas Spadaro              40         Vice President of Technology
                                         since December 12, 2000


There were five board meetings during 2000.  All the directors had 100%
attendance. except for Anand Kumar who was unable to attend 3 meetings.  Mr.
Kumar resigned from the Board on January 17, 2001.

None of the above persons is related to any other of the above-named persons
by blood or marriage.

Based upon a review of filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and written representations that no other reports were required, the Company
believes that all of the Company's directors and executive officers complied
during fiscal 2000 with the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the
Securities Exchange Acts of 1934.

BIOGRAPHIES
-----------

Sheldon, C. Hofferman, has been an Attorney and Private Investor since 1971.
Mr. Hofferman graduated from the University of Pennsylvania in 1966 and
Temple University Law School in 1971.  He was in private law practice in
Washington, D.C., specializing in communications law, from 1971 to 1974.  He
served as Senior Trial Attorney for the Federal Trade Commission from 1974 to
1983, and re-entered private law practice thereafter.  Mr. Hofferman has also
served as General Partner of Golden Phoenix Limited Partnership, an
investment concern, since 1983.

 Joy C. Hartman became President and Chief Executive Officer in January
2000, and continues to serve as Assistant Secretary and Treasurer. Ms.
Hartman joined us in January 1982. In addition to holding these positions,
other positions she has held with us include CFO, Treasurer, Corporate
Secretary, and Executive Vice President. Her prior experiences included
TeleSciences, Inc., and Peat Marwick Mitchell. Ms. Hartman is a graduate of
The Wharton School of Business of the University of Pennsylvania. She is a
member of the Financial Executives Institute, the National Association of
Corporate Directors, and the American Society of Corporate Secretaries.


Kenneth P. Ray has been President of DelRay, Inc., an active
telecommunications consulting firm, for more than the past five years.  From
1964 to 1987, he was associated with ITT in various responsible positions
and in 1976 became Vice President of ITT Telecommunications, with
responsibility for engineering, marketing and sales departments.  In 1981,
he became Vice President and Director of Operations for the Transmission
Division of ITT Space Communications.  In January 1987,

-17-
<PAGE>

ITT's telecommunications group was acquired by Alcatel and Mr. Ray became
Vice President of Marketing and Development for Alcatel Network Systems.
From 1988 to 1991, he was Vice President for Technology and Business
Development for Alcatel North America, a telecommunications company.  Mr. Ray
received a BSEE from Polytechnic Institute of New York in 1954 and a
Masters in Economics from North Carolina State University in 1970.


 Alan C. Bashforth, President and Chief Executive Officer of SciDyn until
January 2000, relinquished those positions and served as Chairman of the
Board until November 15, 2000.  He was President of Cascadent
Communications, a major customer of SciDyn until December 15, 2000.
Previously he was President of Innovative Communications Technology, LTD.
(ICT), a data communications company, located in Jersey, Channel Islands,
until the acquisition of the intellectual property of ICT by us in November
1996.  Prior experience included ownership of the CSL Group of companies
from its inception in 1975.  CSL is a Communications and Computer
engineering group and employed over 100 people in 1992 when Mr. Bashforth
sold the company.  From 1970 to 1975, Mr. Bashforth was employed by
Automaten CI, LTD., an office equipment and telecommunications company, in
various engineering and sales positions leading to the position of General
Manager.  Mr. Bashforth was educated in electronic engineering at Mid Herts
Polytechnic College in England and holds a Higher National Diploma in
Electronic Engineering.  Mr. Bashforth also serves as a
Director of Satellite Media Services Ltd.

Anand Kumar received a Ph.D. Candidacy degree in Communications and a M.S.
degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Connecticut.  He
also received a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering (Honors) from Jadavpur
University, India.  In 1980, Mr. Kumar founded Communications Strategies
Group, a technology-consulting firm serving clients in North America, Europe
and Asia, for which he continues to serve as principal.  He has thirty years
of experience in the telecommunications and electronics industries
including: Executive Vice President of FaciliCom International; Washington
International Teleport - Founder and Chief Executive Officer from 1986 -
1992; General Telephone & Electronics - Manager Marketing Services and
Product Development from 1978 - 1980.


 John Innes, has been Chairman since December 1997 of ACHP, a company
started to meet the need of electronic banking/funds transfer marketing and
processing.  From 1994 through December 1997, he was engaged in his own
practice as an attorney, investor and consultant.  He has 30 years of
experience managing, reorganizing, and financing public and private
companies. Since 1971, he has been an attorney, consultant and investor in
companies in various industries including investment banking, media,
aviation, waste management and electronic commerce.  From 1992 to 1994, Mr.
Innes was Chairman of Commonwealth Associates, a New York based investment-
banking firm. Mr. Innes served as Vice-Chairman of Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel
Corporation; Managing Director of Sabre Insurance Company Limited from
1986 - 1991; he also served as General Counsel of Gulfstream Aerospace
Corporation from 1976 - 1986.  Mr. Innes graduated from Williams College
and from Temple University Law School.


 L. Michael Hone, was the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Centennial Technologies, Inc., a publicly traded company, from August 1997
through June 2001. Previously he was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
PSC, Inc., a publicly held manufacturer of hand-held and fixed-position
laser-based bar code scanners, scan engines and other scanning products from
1992 to 1997.  Mr. Hone also served as director of Rochester Healthcare
Information Group, Inc., a company principally engaged in providing data
processing management to the healthcare industry.  Mr. Hone served as
director of the Association for the Blind and Visually Impaired, Inc., which
is principally engaged in assisting the blind and visually impaired to
achieve vocational and social independence.  Mr. Hone was previously
chairman of AIM USA and AIM International.  Mr. Hone is a named inventor on
six United States patents. He attended Ohio State University where he
majored in Business.


 Louis Padulo, a President Emeritus of University City Science Center in
Philadelphia Pennsylvania since 1997, served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of the non-profit consortium of leading universities and
organizations, between 1991 and 1996.  Previously, he served as President of
the University of Alabama in Huntsville and has held a number of
administrative and faculty positions with Boston University, Stanford
University, Morehouse College, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and
the University of Tokyo among others.  Additionally, Mr. Padulo possesses
extensive industry and consulting experience, and has held and continues to
hold a number of board and directorship positions with both public and
private organizations.  Mr. Padulo received a Bachelor of Science degree
from Fairleigh Dickinson University, a Master of Science degree in
Electrical Engineering from Stanford University, and a Ph.D. from the
Georgia Institute of Technology.

-18-
<PAGE>


James L. Koley has served as an Attorney in general law practice since 1974,
as well as during the periods of 1956 to 1959 and 1961 to 1963.  He
currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Koley Jessen P.C., a
professional corporation engaged in the practice of law.  Between 1963 and
1974, Mr. Koley served as Secretary and Vice President of Peter Kiewit Sons'
Inc., a major international construction firm, and as a Secretary and
Director overseeing its 37 subsidiaries.  Mr. Koley has served and continues
to serve on a number of boards of both public and private entities,
including Arts-Way Manufacturing Co. Inc., and Dover Corporation.  Mr. Koley
received both a B.A. and Doctor of Laws degree from Creighton University,
and is a member of the Nebraska and Omaha Bar Associations.

Robert O'Connor came to us from PricewaterhouseCoopers, L.L.P in
Philadelphia, PA, where he served from January 1998 to May 2000, as a manager
of middle market advisory services.  Form May 1996 to June 1997, he served as
controller of Optic Image Software Corporation.   Mr. O'Connor served as
vice president of finance and administration at AW Computer Systems from
May 1993 to September 1996.  Mr. O'Connor received his MBA from
Rutgers-Graduate School of Management, BS from Kean University in Union, NJ,
and he is a Certified Public Accountant.

Joseph Giegerich brings to SciDyn more than 11 years of product marketing,
product introduction, and marketing strategy experience in the
telecommunications field, specializing in advanced and emerging
technologies. He has been involved in all aspects of new business
development, including two startups, an acquisition, and a successful IPO.
Most recently, he served as Vice President of Sales for iFace.com, a
telecommunications equipment provider specializing in Internet and Computer
Telephony applications. Previously, He served as Director of Key Accounts
with Philips Speech Processing, a division of Philips Electronics NA, where
he directly managed $40 million in strategic channel relationships for
Philips core speech technology. He was one of the original founders of Voice
Systems Technology (VST), a company offering network-based enhanced service
platforms and pre-paid wireless applications. VST was subsequently sold to
Boston Communications Group and went public shortly after. Earlier in his
career, He built and launched a successful voice messaging service bureau.
He earned a degree from Rutgers University in Economics, with a minor in
Computer Science.

Thomas Spadaro leads the design and development of telephony solutions that
facilitate the transition from a circuit-switched network to a digital,
packet-based communications environment. Since joining SciDyn in 1983,
Thomas has managed the development and design of all major product offerings
for the company including the Integrator Series of IP gateways, the Call
Control System for correctional facilities and the VFX-250S, Video over
Frame Relay Access Device. Thomas previously served as SciDyn's Director of
Engineering.


-19-
<PAGE>


ITEM 10. MANAGEMENT REMUNERATION AND TRANSACTIONS

Executive Compensation Summary Table

The following table sets forth all information concerning total
compensation earned or paid to the Company's Chief Executive Officer and
the two other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company
who served in such capacities as of December 31, 2000 for services
rendered to the Company during each of the last three fiscal years.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

                           Annual Compensation      Long term compensation
                          -----------------------  --------------------------
Name and            Year  Salary     Bonus  Other            Awards                 All
Principal                   ($)       ($)   Annual     Restrict-  Options/  LTIP    Other
Position                                    Compen-    ed Stock   SARs(#)   Pay-    Compensa-
                                            sation ($)    ($)               outs($) tion ($)
----------          ----  ------     -----  ---------- --------- ---------- ------  --------
<S>                <C>   <C>        <C>    <C>        <C>       <C>        <C>     <C>
Joy C.Hartman,      2000  161,185     -0-    1,666        -0-   100,000       -0-      -0-
President and       1999  113,237     -0-       -0-       -0-    10,000       -0-      -0-
CEO (1)             1998  111,000     -0-    5,632        -0-        -0-      -0-      -0-

Thomas Spadaro      2000   87,151     -0-    1,104        -0-    25,000       -0-      -0-
Vice President(2)


Robert O'Connor     2000   67,842     -0-       -0-       -0-    20,000       -0-      -0-
Vice President(3)


Joseph Giegerich    2000   24,038     -0-       -0-       -0-    60,000       -0-      -0-
Vice President(4)


</TABLE>


(1)      Ms. Hartman was appointed President and CEO of SciDyn in January 2000.

(2)      Mr. Spadaro was appointed Vice President on December 17, 2000;
         previously he was the Company's Director of Engineering.

(3)      Mr. O'Connor was appointed Vice President on May 18, 2000.

(4)      Mr. Giegerich was appointed Vice President on October 17, 2000.


-20-
<PAGE>


The outside Directors receive $250.00 per meeting as standard compensation
for service as directors.  The Company has an employment agreement with one
officer, who is also a director of the company.  The employment agreement
contains change in control provisions that would entitle the officer to
receive up to 2.99 times the annual salary if there is a change in control
in the Company (as defined) and a termination of employment. The maximum
contingent liability under this agreement in such event is approximately
$523,250.

Options Grants for Fiscal 2000

100,000 options were granted to Ms. Hartman during 2000.
20,000 options were granted to Mr. O'Connor during 2000.
25,000 options were granted to Mr. Spadaro during 2000.
60,000 options were granted to Mr. Giegerich during 2000.




ITEM  11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
          MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information as of March 21, 2001 with
respect to the beneficial ownership of the common stock by each beneficial
owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares thereof, by each director,
each nominee to become a director and each executive officer named in the
Summary Compensation Table and by all executive officers, directors and
nominees to become directors of the Company as a group. Under the rules of
the Commission, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of a security
if such person has or shares the power to vote or direct the voting of such
security or the power to dispose or direct the disposition of such security.
A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities if that
person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days.
Accordingly, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of
the same securities.  Unless otherwise indicated by footnote, the named
entities or individuals have sole voting and investment power with respect
to the shares of common stock beneficially owned. There are no arrangements
known to the Company including pledges of securities, which might, at a
subsequent date, result in any change of control of the Company.



<Table>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Shares of
                                                             Common
                                                              Stock
  Name and Address of                                        Beneficially        Percent of
  Beneficial Owner               Title                       Owned      Outstanding Shares(1)
  ----------------               -----                    ---------     ------------------
 <S>                            <C>                        <C>           <C>

Sheldon C. Hofferman,            Chairman                 2,619,921(2)        14.82%
PO Box 350
Fairfax Station, VA  22039

Alan C. Bashforth                Director                 1,520,000(3)         8.60%
Le Virage
La Route de Sainte Marie,
St. Mary, Jersey, UK
JE3 3DB

Edwin S. Marks                   5% Owner                 1,129,000            6.40%
135 East 57th Street
27th Floor
New York, New York  10022

-21-
<PAGE>

Charles Bresler                  5% Owner                 1,322,666            7.50%
401 M Street SW
Washington, DC

Joy C. Hartman                   CEO/President              215,185(4)         1.2%
27 Hogan Way                     commencing
Moorestown, NJ   08057           Jan 28, 2000
                                 CFO, Treasurer,
                                 Secretary, Director

Kenneth P. Ray                   Director                    46,300(5)         0.26%
909 Darfield Drive
Raleigh, NC   27615


Joseph Giegerich                 Vice President of           25,000            0.14%
46 Longbridge Dr.                Sales and Marketing
Mount Laurel, NJ  08054

Thomas Spadaro                   Vice President of           82,455(6)         0.47%
41 Fountain Blvd                 Engineering
Burlington, NJ  08016


Robert O'Connor                  Vice President of           20,000(7)         0.11%
53 Sorrel Run                    Finance and
Mt. Laurel, NJ  08054            Administration

James L. Koley                   Director as of             142,000            0.80%
Suite 800, One Pacific Place     January 17, 2001
1125 S. 103 Street
Omaha, NE  68124-1079

All Directors, 5% owners
and Officers As a group                                   7,112,527           40.30%

</TABLE>

(1)	Based upon a total number of 17,657,901 shares outstanding as of
      March 30, 2001.
(2)	The total includes 2,619,921 shares owned by Golden Phoenix, LP., of
      which Mr. Hofferman is General Partner.

(3)	Shares in the name of Innovative Communications Technology, LTD., a
      corporation, controlled by Mr. Bashforth.

(4)	The 215,185 shares in Ms. Hartman's name include incentive options,
      exercisable within sixty days to acquire 155,000 shares, and 20,000
      warrants, and 300 shares owned by Ms. Hartman's children.

(5)	The 46,300 shares owned by Mr. Ray include incentive options,
      exercisable within sixty days to acquire 30,000 shares.

(6)	The 82,455 shares owned by Mr. Spadaro include incentive options,
      exercisable within sixty days to acquire 56,200 shares.

(7)	The 20,000 shares owned by Mr. O'Connor include incentive options,
      exercisable within sixty days to acquire 20,000 shares.


-22-
<PAGE>


ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

In January, the Company entered into an agreement for consulting services
with Alan Bashforth.  The consulting services primarily related to
identifying, evaluating, and recommending business strategies for the
Company.  This Agreement will expire on April 30, 2001 and will not be
renewed.

The Company sold $4,370,146 of its Integrator gateway product to Cascadent
Communications.  Alan Bashforth, one of Cascadent's principals, is a member
of the Company's Board of Directors.


ITEM 13. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:

1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 Report of Independent Accountants dated March 10, 2001............Page 26
 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000
 and 1999..........................................................Page 27
 Consolidated Statements of Operations, two years ended
 December 31, 2000.................................................Page 28
 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, two years ended
 December 31, 2000.................................................Page 29
 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders'
 Equity, two years ended December 31, 2000.........................Page 30
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements........................Page 31-38


2.	INDEX OF EXHIBITS

 Exhibit No.  Description of Exhibit
 3.1(1)       The Articles of Incorporation
 3.2(1)       By-Laws
 4.1(2)       1992 Incentive Stock Option Plan of the Registrant
 10.01(3)     Common Stock Purchase Agreement between Registrant and
              Alpha Venture Capital, Inc.
 10.01(3)     Registration Rights Agreement between Registrant and
              Alpha Venture Capital, Inc.
 10.01(3)     Escrow Agreement between Registrant and Alpha Venture
              Capital, Inc.
 10.01(3)     Warrant "A" between Registrant and Alpha Venture
              Capital, Inc.
 10.01(3)     Warrant "B" between Registrant and Alpha Venture
              Capital, Inc.

 10.14        Agreement between the Registrant and @IPBell Inc, dated
              February 11, 2000


1	Filed as like-numbered exhibits to Registration Statement,
      Form S-18, File Number 33-20687, effective April 21, 1981,
      incorporated by reference.
2     Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Quarterly Report on
      Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 1996).
3     Incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Form 8-K filed
      March 15, 2001.

(b)   Reports on Form 8-k:
      None


-23-
<PAGE>

                                     SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, the
registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.

SCIENCE DYNAMICS CORPORATION


BY:    /s/Joy C. Hartman
       -----------------
       CEO/President


DATED: September 6, 2001
       -----------------



In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the date indicated.


      Signature                        Title                    Date
      ---------                        -----                    ----


BY:  /s/ Sheldon C. Hofferman   Chairman of the Board of      September 6, 2001
     ------------------------   Directors                     -----------------
     Sheldon C. Hofferman


BY:  /s/ Joy C. Hartman         CEO/President                 September 6, 2001
     ------------------------                                 -----------------
     Joy C. Hartman


BY:  /s/ Alan C. Bashforth      Director                      September 6, 2001
     ------------------------                                 -----------------
     Alan C. Bashforth


BY:  /s/ Kenneth P. Ray         Director                      September 6, 2001
     ------------------------                                 -----------------
     Kenneth P. Ray


BY:  /s/ L. Michael Hone        Director                      September 6, 2001
     ------------------------                                 -----------------
     L. Michael Hone


BY:  /s/ John Innes             Director                      September 6, 2001
     ------------------------                                 -----------------
     John Innes


BY:  /s/ Louis Padulo           Director                      September 6, 2001
     ------------------------                                 -----------------
     Louis Padulo

BY:  /s/Robert O'Connor         Vice President of Finance     September 6, 2001
     ------------------------   and Administration and        -----------------
     Robert O'Connor            Chief Financial Officer







                          SCIENCE DYNAMICS CORPORATION
                          ----------------------------

                  Index to Consolidated Financial Statements



Report of Independent Accountants dated March 10, 2001.............Page 26

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999.......Page 27

Consolidated Statements of Operations, two years ended
December 31, 2000 .................................................Page 28

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, two years ended
December 31, 2000 .................................................Page 29

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity,
two years ended December 31, 2000 .................................Page 30

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements .......................Pages 31-38

-25-
<PAGE>


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


To the Board of Directors
Science Dynamics Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Science
Dynamics Corporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash
flows for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999.  These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material resects, the consolidated financial position
of Science Dynamics Corporation and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2000 and
1999 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows
for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.




Peter C. Cosmas Co., CPAs

370 Lexington Avenue
Suite 1205
New York, NY 10017



March 10, 2001, except for notes: (1 H), (3), (7), (11) for which the date is
September 6, 2001.





<TABLE>
                           SCIENCE DYNAMICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
                                  CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                               AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2000 AND 1999

<CAPTION>
                        ASSETS
                                                                    December 31,
                                                             2000                   1999
                                                             ----                   ----

<S>                                                   <C>                     <C>
Current assets:
   Cash and cash equivalents                           $1,351,641              $  674,793
   Accounts receivable - trade                            102,194                 157,040
   Accounts receivable - other                             51,401                  63,677
   Inventories                                             87,623                 361,039
   Other current assets                                    84,566                  50,185
                                                       ----------               ---------
      Total current assets                              1,677,425               1,306,734
                                                       ----------               ---------

Property and equipment, net                             1,005,364                 260,543
Deferred income taxes                                           -                 308,000
Intangible Assets, net of accumulated
 amortization of $1,200,000 in 2000 and
 $900,000 in 1999.                                        300,000                 600,000
Other assets                                               25,363                 133,776
                                                       ----------               ---------
      Total assets                                     $3,008,152              $2,609,053
                                                       ==========               =========

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
   Current portion of capital lease obligation         $   57,598              $        -
   Accounts payable                                       358,820                 215,409
   Accrued expenses                                       118,059                 424,677
                                                       ----------               ---------
      Total current liabilities                           534,477                 640,086
                                                       ----------               ---------

Non current portion of capital lease obligation           128,413                       -
                                                       ----------               ---------
      Total liabilities                                   662,890                 640,086

Commitments

Shareholders' equity -
   Common stock - .01 par value,
      45,000,000 shares authorized,
      17,783,700 and 17,286,278 issued
      17,657,900 and 17,160,478 outstanding
      in 2000 and 1999 respectively.                      177,837                 172,862
   Additional paid-in capital                          14,266,787              12,556,205
   (Deficit)                                          (11,701,529)            (10,362,267)
                                                       ----------               ---------
                                                        2,743,095               2,366,800
   Common stock held in treasury,
    at cost                                              (397,833)               (397,833)
                                                       ----------               ---------
   Total shareholders' equity                           2,345,262               1,968,967
                                                       ----------               ---------
   Total liabilities and shareholders'
    Equity                                             $3,008,152              $2,609,053
                                                       ==========               =========


   The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

-27-
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
                           SCIENCE DYNAMICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
                              CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                         FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 AND 1999

<CAPTION>

                                                    2000                             1999
                                                    ----                             ----
<S>                                         <C>                              <C>

 NET SALES                                   $5,269,377                       $2,347,984



Operating costs and expenses:

      Cost of sales                           1,891,484                        1,330,886
      Research and development                1,141,656                        1,331,521
      Selling, general
          and administrative                  3,605,768                        1,728,244
                                             ----------                       ----------

                                              6,638,908                        4,390,651
                                             ----------                       ----------

Operating Loss                               (1,369,531)                      (2,042,667)

Other income (expenses):
   Interest income                               40,647
   Interest expense                             (10,378)                         (12,219)
                                             ----------                       ----------


Net Loss                                    $(1,339,262)                     $(2,054,886)
                                             ==========                       ==========



Net Loss per common share
  basic and diluted                         $     (0.08)                     $     (0.12)
                                             ==========                       ==========


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

-28-
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
                                SCIENCE DYNAMICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
                                  CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                               FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,2000 AND 1999

<CAPTION>

                                                             2000                   1999
                                                             ----                   ----
<S>                                                    <C>                  <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
   Net Loss                                             $(1,339,262)         $(2,054,886)
                                                        -----------          -----------

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to
 net cash used for
 operating activities:
   Depreciation                                             159,859               94,101
   Amortization of capitalized software                           -              138,996
   Amortization of Intangible assets                        300,000              300,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
   (Increase) decrease in:
    Accounts receivable                                      54,846              109,363
    Other receivable                                         12,276              596,223
    Inventories                                             273,416              117,455
    Other current assets                                    (34,381)              (3,919)
    Other assets                                            108,413                7,642
   Decrease in:
     Accounts Payable and
        accrued expenses                                   (163,207)            (179,900)
                                                        -----------          -----------

Total adjustments                                           711,222            1,179,961
                                                        -----------          -----------

 Net cash used for
  operating activities                                     (628,040)            (874,925)
                                                        -----------          -----------

Cash flows from investing activities:

 Purchase of property and equipment - net                  (704,246)            (123,555)
                                                        -----------          -----------

   Net cash used in investing activities                 (704,246)              (123,555)
                                                        -----------          -----------

Cash flows from financing activities:
 Increase (decrease) in:
  Payment on loan payable                                         -             (100,000)
  Payment on capitalized lease                              (14,423)                   -
  Proceeds from sale of income tax NOL                      308,000                    -
 Issuance of common stock and warrants                    1,715,557            1,741,024
                                                        -----------          -----------

   Net cash provided
    by financing activities                               2,009,134            1,641,024
                                                        -----------          -----------

Net increase in
 cash and cash equivalents                                  676,848              642,544

Cash and cash equivalents -
 beginning of period                                        674,793               32,249
                                                        -----------          -----------

Cash and cash equivalents -
 end of period                                            1,351,641              674,793
                                                        ===========          ===========

Noncash transactions:
Increase in Capital Lease Obligations                   $   200,434           $        -
                                                        ===========          ===========


    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

-29-
</TABLE>

<TABLE>

                                                SCIENCE DYNAMICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
                                         CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
                                             FOR THE TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 AND 1999
<CAPTION>


                                    Common Stock                    Additional                          Treasury
                                    ------------                      Paid-In                           --------
                                       Shares         Amount          Capital          (Deficit)         Shares       Amount
                                       ------         ------          -------          ---------         ------       ------
<S>                                <C>             <C>           <C>               <C>                 <C>         <C>


Balance
 December 31, 1998                  15,861,449      $158,614      $ 10,729,429      $ (8,307,381)       125,800     $397,833
                                    ----------      --------      ------------      -------------       -------     -------

Exercise of Stock Options               34,800           348            26,984                 -              -           -
Issuance of common stock
 net of related expenses             1,218,000        12,180         1,701,512                 -              -           -
Common Stock issued
 for patent                            172,029         1,720            98,280


Net loss                                     -             -                 -        (2,054,886)             -           -


Balance
 December 31, 1999                  17,286,278      $172,862      $ 12,556,205      $(10,362,267)       125,800    $397,833
                                    ----------      --------      ------------      -------------       -------     -------


Exercise of Stock Options              283,673         2,838           151,069                 -              -           -
Issuance of common stock
 net of related expenses               213,749         2,137         1,559,513                 -              -           -

Net loss                                     -             -                 -        (1,339,262)             -           -
                                    ----------      --------      ------------      -------------       -------     -------



Balance
 December 31, 2000                  17,783,700      $177,837       $14,266,787       (11,701,529)       125,800    $397,833
                                    ==========      ========      ============      =============       =======     =======

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

-30-
</TABLE>



             SCIENCE DYNAMICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
             NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1)	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

  a)  Principles of Consolidation:

      The consolidated financial statements include the Company's
      wholly owned subsidiary. All intercompany transactions have been
      eliminated in consolidation.

  b)	Organization and Description of Business:

      The Company, which was incorporated in May, 1973 and commenced
      operations in July 1977, is engaged in the design, development,
      integration and marketing of advanced telecommunications products
      and applications.   All the Company's operations are considered
      to be in one industry.

  c)	Use of Estimates:

      The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
      generally accepted accounting principles require management to
      make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
      of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
      liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
      reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
      periods.  Actual results could differ from those estimated.

  d)	Inventories:

      Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost
      determined on a first-in, first-out basis.

  e)	Property and Equipment:

      Property and equipment are stated at cost, depreciation of
      property and equipment is computed generally using the straight-
      line method based on estimated useful lives of five years for
      machinery and equipment and seven years for furniture and
      fixtures. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the life of
      the related lease or their estimated useful lives, whichever is
      shorter, using the straight-line method.  Costs of major
      additions and betterment's are capitalized; maintenance and
      repairs which do not improve or extend the life of respective
      assets are charged to expenses as incurred.  When an asset is
      sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost of the property and the
      relate d accumulated depreciation is removed from the respective
      accounts and any resulting gains or losses are reflected in
      income.

  f)	Cash and Cash Equivalents:

      The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments
      purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash
      equivalents.

  g)	Income Taxes:

      The Company elected to adopt the provisions of Statement of
      Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109 "Accounting for
      Income Taxes", (SFAS No. 109) in 1992.  Under SFAS No. 109,
      deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in

-31-
<PAGE>

      future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and
      liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-
      end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable
      to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect
      taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when
      necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to
      be realized. Income tax expenses (credit) is the tax payable
      (receivable) for the period and the change during the period in
      deferred tax assets and liabilities.

  h)	Revenue Recognition:

       Revenue is generally recognized when all significant
      contractual obligations have been satisfied and collection of the
      resulting receivable is reasonably assured.  Revenue from product
      sales is recognized  at time of delivery and acceptance and after
      consideration of all the terms and conditions of the customers
      contract.  Sales of services are recognized at time of
      performance.  The Company follows SOP 97-2, "Software Revenue
      Recognition," as such the Company recognizes product revenue upon
      shipment if a signed contract exists, the fee is fixed or
      determinable, collection of resulting receivables is probable and
      product returns are reasonable estimable.


  i)	Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:

      Effective January 1, 1996, the Company adopted SFAS No. 121,
      "Accounting for the Impairment of long-lived Assets and for long-
      lived Assets to be Disposed of." SFAS No. 121 requires the Company
      to review the recoverability of the carrying amounts of its long-
      lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
      that the carrying amount of the asset might not be recoverable.

      In the event that facts and circumstances indicate that the
      carrying amount of long-lived assets may be impaired, an
      evaluation of recoverability would be performed.  If an evaluation
      is required, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows
      associated with the asset would be compared to the assets'
      carrying amount to determine if a write-down to fair value is
      required.  Fair value may be determined by reference to discounted
      future cash flows over the remaining useful life of the related
      asset.  In 2000, the Company wrote off the carrying value of one
      of its patents in the amount of $89,706.

  j)	Fair Value Disclosures:

      The carrying amounts reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
      for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts
      payable and accrued expenses, approximate fair value because of
      the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial
      instruments.

  k)	Stock Options:

      The Company accounts for its stock options in accordance with the
      provisions of Accounting principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,
      Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related
      interpretations.  As such, compensation expense would be recorded
      on the date of grant only if the current market price of the
      underlying stock exceeded the exercise price.  On January 1,
      1996, the Company adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No.
      123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation. Had the company
      determined compensation cost based on fair value at the grant
      date for stock options under SFAS No. 123 the effect would have
      been immaterial.

-32-
<PAGE>

  l)  New Accounting Pronouncements:

      In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
      issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
      Hedging Activities"  and in June 2000 issued SFAS No. 138,
      accounting for certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging
      Activities, an amendment of SFAS No. 133.  These new standards
      require companies to record derivative financial instruments on
      the balance sheet as assets or liabilities, measured at fair
      value.  Gains or losses resulting from changes in the fair value
      of those derivatives would be accounted for based on the use of
      the derivative and whether the instrument qualified for hedge
      accounting, as defined in SFAS 133 and 138.  The Company is
      required to implement these statements in the first quarter of
      fiscal 2001.   The company has not used derivative instruments and
      believes the impact of adoption of this statement will not have a
      significant effect on the financial statements.

      In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")
      issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in
      Financial Statements" ("SAB No. 101"), which provided guidance on
      the recognition, presentation and disclosure of revenue in
      financial statements. SAB No. 101 did not impact the Company's
      revenue recognition policies.

      In March 2000, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, released
      FASB Interpretation No. 44, "Accounting for Certain Transactions
      involving Stock Compensation, an interpretation of APB Opinion No.
      25," which provides clarification of Opinion No. 25 for certain
      issues, such as the determination of who is an employee, the
      criteria for determining whether a plan qualifies as a non-
      compensatory plan, the accounting consequence of various
      modifications to the terms of a previously fixed stock option or
      award, and the accounting for an exchange of stock compensation
      awards in a business combination.  The Company believes that its
      practices are in conformity with this guidance, and therefore
      Interpretation No. 44 will have no impact on its financial
      statements.

  2)	Accounts Receivable:

The Company evaluates its accounts receivable on a customer-by-customer
basis and has determined that no allowance for doubtful accounts is
necessary at December 31, 2000 and 1999.

  3)	Property and Equipment:

A summary of the major components of property and equipment is as follows:

       Computers, fixtures
       And equipment                          $1,452,454      $ 547,775

       Less accumulated Depreciation            (447,090)      (287,232)
                                              ----------      ---------

       Totals                                 $1,005,364      $ 260,543
                                              ==========      =========


The computer and software includes $221,862 of capitalized software which
was related to contracted labor to provide SNMP, an additional feature, to
our 2308 Gateway series. SNMP is widely used in the industry and the project
was to integrate its functionality into our existing software using known
integration techniques. Detailed plans for the integration were provided by
the vendor and the requirement of technological feasibility as defined under
Financial Accounting Standard 86 was satisfied. The SNMP feature will be
included in all future shipments of the 2308 series and is being amortized
over 24 months. Amortization expense related to this capitalized software
will begin in 2002 as the new release containing the SNMP feature became
available in January.

-33-
<PAGE>



  4)	Income Taxes:

In 1992, the Company adopted SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income taxes.
Under the provision of SFAS No. 109, the Company elected not to restate prior
years due to immateriality.  Inc. 1992, the effect of the change was to
decrease the net loss by $308,000 (.10 per share).  The deferred tax asset
recognized in the accompanying balance sheet a December 31, 1999 was
recovered through the sale of New Jersey State net-operating loss carryovers
as permitted by the State in the amount of $308,000.

At this time, the Company does not believe it can reliably predict
profitability for the long-term.  Accordingly, the deferred tax asset
applicable to 2000 and 1999 operations has been reduced in its entirety by
the valuation allowance.

As a result of the operating losses for the years ended December 31, 1990
and 1992-2000 the Company has available to offset future taxable income a
net operating loss of $12,722,364 expiring 2005-2020. In addition, research
credits expiring 2005-2014 are available to offset future taxes.

The components of the provision (credit) for income taxes from continuing
operations is as follows:


                                     2000	       1999
                                     ----        ----

          Deferred
            Federal                $    -      $    -

          Current
            Federal                     -           -
            State                       -           -
                                   ------      ------
                                   $    -      $    -
                                   ------      ------


Differences between the tax provision computed using the statutory federal
income tax rate and the effective income tax rate on operations is as
follows:

                                     2000	       1999
                                     ----        ----
          Federal
          Statutory rate        $(455,349)    $(698,661)

          Research tax
          Credits                       -             -

          Tax benefit not
          Provided due
          To valuation
          Allowance               455,349       698,661
                                ---------     ---------
                                        -             -
                                =========     =========

-34-
<PAGE>


Components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities are as
follows:


                                      December 31,
                                  2000            1999
                                  ----            ----

Deferred tax assets:
Tax benefits related
To net operating
Loss carry forwards
And research tax
Credits                         $4,298,635    $3,843,286
                                ----------    ----------


Total deferred tax
Asset                            4,298,635     3,843,286

Valuation
Allowance for
Deferred tax
Assets                           4,298,635     3,843,286
                                ----------    ----------

Net deferred tax
Assets                              $   -0-         $ -0-
                                ----------    ----------


5)	Commitments:


      a) Leases

         The Company leases their office, sales and manufacturing
         facilities and certain vehicles under non-cancelable operating
         leases with varying terms.  The leases generally provide that the
         Company pay the taxes, maintenance and insurance expenses related
         to the leased assets.  Future minimum lease payments required
         under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-
         cancelable lease terms in excess of one year, as of December 31,
         2000 are as follows:

                             2001        $193,622
                             2002         185,483
                             2003         185,483
                             2004         183,052
                             2005         181,836
                      After  2005          60,612
                                         --------

           Total minimum lease payments  $990,088


b)	Employment Agreement:

The Company has an employment agreement with one officer, who is
also a director of the company.  The employment agreement contains
change in control provisions that would entitle the officer to
receive up to 2.99 times the annual salary if there is a change in
control in the Company (as defined) and a termination of
employment. The maximum contingent liability under this agreement
in such event is approximately $523,250.


-35-
<PAGE>



6)	Intangible Assets:

On November 7, 1996, the Company acquired "Intellectual Property", issuing
1,500,000 shares of its common stock. Based on technical reviews of the
property and the business potential of the technology, the Company valued the
"Intellectual Property" at $1,500,000.  The Company began amortizing the
property on January 1, 1997 over a period of five years.  The amortization
for 2000 and 1999 was $300,000 for each year.


7)	Stock Options and Warrants:

 On November 17, 1999 the Company amended the Incentive Stock Option
Plan,  authorizing an additional 1,088,000 shares, which increased the total
 number of shares available under the Plan to 1,378,950.  Options may be
granted under the Plan to employees and directors at no less than 100%  of
the fair value on the date of grant.  The options expire ten years  after
the date of grant.

Changes in shares under the Plan were as follows:


                                         Shares           Weighted
                                         Under            Average
                                         Option           per Share



Balance January 1, 1999                 177,500         $     0.81

Options Granted                          60,000         $     0.50
Options Terminated
Options Exercised                       (34,800)        $     0.79

Balance December 31, 1999               202,700         $     0.97

Options Granted                         587,173         $     3.83
Options Terminated                         (500)        $     7.62
Options Exercised                      (283,673)        $     0.54

Balance December 31, 2000               505,700         $     4.76


The total amount of shares granted and not exercised at December 31, 2000
amount to 505,700 at exercise prices ranging from 0.50 to 10.75 per share.
The total amount of shares exercisable at the end of the year was 293,200
with a weighted average exercise price of  $6.94.  The weighted average
remaining contractual life of the options at the end  of the year was 7
years.

As allowed by FASB No. 123, The Company has elected to continue to follow
Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 23, " Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees" (APB No. 25) in accounting for its stock option plans.
 Under APB No. 25, the Company does not recognize compensation expense on
the issuance of its stock options because the options terms are fixed and
the exercise price equals the market price of the underlying stock on the
grant date.

-36-
<PAGE>

As required by FASB No. 123, the Company has determined the pro-forma
information as if the Company had accounted for stock options granted since
January 1, 1996, under the fair value method of FASB No. 123. An  option
pricing model similar to the Black-Sholes was used with the following
weighted average assumptions used for grants in the year 2000 and 1999,
respectively: expected volatility of 80 percent; risk free interest rate of
7% and 6% respectively and expected lives of 5 years.  The pro-forma effect
of these options on net earnings was not material.  These pro-forma
calculations only include the effect of 1999 and 2000 grants.  As such, the
impacts are not necessarily indicative of the effects on reported net income
of future years.

8)	Major Customers:

During 2000 two customers accounted for 83% and 15% of total sales.  During
1999 three customers and their operating subsidiaries accounted for 64.63%,
10.31% and 9.71% of total sales.

9)	Earnings (Loss) Per Share:

In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No.
128.  "Earnings Per Share" applicable for financial statements issued for
periods ending after December 15, 1997.  As required the Company adopted SFAS
No. 128 for the year ended December 31, 1997 and restated all prior period
earnings per share figures.  The Company has presented basic earnings per
share.  Basic earnings per share excludes potential dilution and is
calculated by dividing income available to common stockholders by the
weighted average number of outstanding common shares.  Diluted earnings per
share incorporates the potential dilutions from all potentially dilutive
securities that would have reduced earnings per share.  Since the potential
issuance of additional shares would reduce loss per share they are considered
anti-dilutive and are excluded from the calculation.

The weighted average number of shares used to compute basic loss per share
was 17,549,993  in 2000 and 16,777,070 in 1999.

10)	Related Party Transactions

During 2000, Scidyn began the deployment of the Cascadent Supply Agreement,
this Agreement provided $4,370,520 in revenue for the year.  The Agreement
was terminated on January 4, 2001, upon  receiving official word that
Cascadent was placed into receivership.   does not have information as to
when or if Cascadent will emerge from receivership as a going concern.  Alan
Bashforth, one of Cascadent's principals, is a member of the Company's Board
of Directors.

-37-
<PAGE>



11)	Subsequent Events

In March 2001 the Company entered into a $40,000,000 Equity line of Credit
arrangement with the Alpha Group. Under the terms of the equity line
agreement, the Company will have the right to sell up to $40 million of its
common stock.  The Company has sole discretion, subject to certain volume
limitations and conditions, to draw down upon such funds as its capital needs
dictate.  The sale price of the common stock will not exceed ten percent of
an average closing bid price to be calculated at the time of each sale. In
connection with such financing Alpha has been issued warrants to purchase up
to 500,000 shares of the Company's common stock at exercise prices of $5.00
per share. Additional warrants to purchase up to 500,000 shares of the
Company's common stock at an exercise price equal to the current bid price
will be issued on a pro rata basis at the time of each sale.  The term of the
equity line is for eight months with an automatic one-year extension if at
least ten percent or $4 million is drawn down during the initial eight-month
period.

The equity financing draw downs are subject to a limit of 300 percent of the
"Average Daily Trading Volume", defined as the dollar amount of the average
daily trading volume of shares of the Company's common stock, calculated
based upon the average bid price and average daily trading volume traded over
the twenty trading days preceding multiple put dates.  As such, SciDyn's
ability to access these funds in sufficient amounts will be directly related
to the average daily trading volume as defined.  The agreement contains other
provisions, which may have the potential to limit SciDyn's ability to draw
down funds.  The agreement can be accessed in its entirety as an exhibit to
an 8-K filing made with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Funding under the agreement is also subject to completion of certain terms
and conditions, including the filing of a registration statement with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.  No public offering of the Company's
common stock will be made except by means of a prospectus under an effective
registration statement.

 On May 21, 2001, an agreement was executed to cancel all provisions of
the $40,000,000 Equity Line of Credit arrangement with the Alpha Group.  The
agreement with Alpha was a good deal in which all parties were ready to move
ahead.  However, the Company had immediate capital requirements, which would
not be satisfied by the Alpha agreement.  In particular, funds would only be
provided to the Company by Alpha after the effective date of a registration
statement.  In order to obtain other financing, the Company was required to
cancel the Alpha deal.  Alpha was contacted and agreed to cancel the
agreement, in exchange for a payment of $30,000 to Alpha to cover its
expenses.  The 500,000 warrants that were issued to Alpha on March 2, 200l,
were terminated.


-38-
<PAGE>