alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm





Board of
Directors and Stockholders


First M
& F Corporation


Kosciusko,
Mississippi





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
First M & F Corporation on Form S-8 (Files No. 333-46590, No. 333-76615, No.
333-124050 and No. 333-124844) and Form S-3D (File No. 333-76611) of
our report dated March 4, 2009, on our audit of the consolidated statement
of condition of First M & F Corporation as of December 31, 2008, and
the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,
stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended, which report is
included in the December 31, 2008, annual report on Form 10-K of First
M & F Corporation.  We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated March 4, 2009, on the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting of First M & F Corporation as of
December 31, 2008, which report is included in the December 31,
2008, annual report on Form 10-K of First M & F
Corporation.





/s/ BKD, LLP


Jackson,
Mississippi


March 10,
2009
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMPANY                                                            INCORPORATION
-------                                                            -------------
<S>                                                                <C>    
Aegis Safety Holdings, Inc.                                        Delaware
American Down & Textile Company                                    Wisconsin
Brawn of California, Inc.                                          California
Company Store Holdings, Inc.                                       Delaware
Gump's By Mail, Inc.                                               Delaware
Gump's Corp.                                                       California
Hanover Direct Pennsylvania, Inc.                                  Pennsylvania
Hanover Direct Virginia, Inc.                                      Delaware
Hanover Ventures, Inc.                                             Pennsylvania
LWI Holdings, Inc.                                                 Delaware
Scandia Down Corporation                                           Delaware
Tweeds, Inc.                                                       Delaware
</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.4 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### SMITH v. EXPRESS CO.

No. 22 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 694.

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 8 May 1978. Judgment vacated and case remanded to Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of *Wiles v. Construction Co.,*295 N.C. 81, 8 May 1978.
Michigan Supreme Court
Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr.
Stephen J. Markma n

Diane M. Hathawa y
A lton Thomas Davis,

J ustices 

# Order

September 9, 2010

140960

RON DEXTROM, KEVIN HEITGER, CORY DANFORD, AIMEE DA NFORD, BARBARA HOFSTRA, JACK KIMBLE, ROBERT JAMES LOHMAN, STEVEN MCCORMICK, MARK MCGUCKIN, DIANE MC GUCKIN, WILLIAM MEAD, SHIRLEY MEAD, LAURA SMITH, EDWARD BRICKHEIMER, NORMA BRICKHEIMER, JU STIN PAQUETTE, TAMARA PAQUETTE, GERALD K. ROOT, JANICE M. ROOT, KENNETH BOISSEAU, CHRISTINE BOISSEAU, DAVID E. JOHNSON, KARIN U. JOHNSON, DANIEL P. BIRGY, DOREEN MARIE BIRGY, ERIC BIRDSALL, JUDITH BIRDSALL, RICHARD ANSTETT, BARBARA ANSTETT, HAL HAGADORN, BARBARA HAGADORN, SUZANNE BOERMA, PHILIP BOERMA, JR., CARL A. PHILLIPS, TINA C. PHILLIPS, CHARLES MCGAHA, JOYCE MCGAHA, RITA MCNAMARA, J ONATHON BENNETT, DANIEL A. SUTTON, BE VERLY J. SUTTON, KIMBERLY SULLIVAN, LINDA MOHLER, WALTER MOHLER, GUY MOCABY, JILL MOCABY, LARRY WASHBURN, DEBORAH WASHBURN, RICHARD A. PILON, SALLY E. PILON, JONATHON PIKE, TERRY SUMMERLEE, BECKY SUMMERLEE, RAMEY ROOSE, and LAURA S. HEITGER, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

and SC: 140960

COA: 281020

Wexford CC: 06-019912-CE TONY CASSONE, DONOTA CASSONE, ROGER GRAMES, ELIZABETH ANN GRAMES, JOEL M. YONKMAN, REBECCA F. YONKMAN, CRAIG HANEY, JILL HANEY, JOHNA A. WINCHESTER, DOREEN M. WINCHESTER, SABRINA C. LESTER, ANTHONY VANHEE, MARGARET VANHEE,

MARIANNE ALLISON HOWES, DONALD BIGGER, SCOTT HARANDA, MATTHEW J.I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 9, 2010

p0830 2

CLARK, BETTY L. CLARK, JOE F. BURLSON, CHERYL N. BURLSON, MICHAEL B. JONES, BRIAN SULLIVAN, RO BERT BLACKLEDGE, RACHELLE BLACKLEDGE, PAUL E. CONNER, TERRY L. CONNER, ALBERT WILLIAMS, and FR ANCES WILLIAMS, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v

WEXFORD COUNTY, WEXFORD COUNTY LANDFILL, and WEXFORD COUNTY

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2010
judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not
persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

D AVIS

, J., not participating. I recuse myse lf and am not participating because I
was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5614 

To impose certain requirements on the expenditure of funds by the National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration for the Constellation program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2010 

Mr. ADERHOLT (for himself, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. BONNER, 

Mr. CHAFFETZ, Mr. COFFMAN of Colorado, Mr. DAVIS of Tennessee, Mr. 

GRIFFITH, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. LATTA, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. 

OLSON, Mr. POSEY, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, and Mr. BRIGHT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science 

and Technology 

A BILL 

To impose certain requirements on the expenditure of funds 

by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

for the Constellation program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Human 

5 Space Flight Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPENDITURE LIMITATIONS. 

7 (a) Notwithstanding section 1341 of title 31, United 

8 States Code (commonly referred to as the Anti-Deficiency 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5614 IH

1 Act), amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2010 (or for 

2 prior fiscal years that remain available) to the National 

3 Aeronautics and Space Administration for the Constella4 tion program shall be expended only for carrying out the 

5 Constellation program, including through contracts and 

6 necessary support activities. The Administrator of the Na7 tional Aeronautics and Space Administration shall not ter8 minate or descope contracts for the Constellation program. 

9 (b) The National Aeronautics and Space Administra10 tion shall expend at least 90 percent of all funds described 

11 in subsection (a) no later than September 30, 2010. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
*Pursuant to 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-10301

Summary Calendar

WESTERN OIL & GAS JV, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LLOYD PETROLEUM CORPORATION, ETC., ET AL.,

 Defendants,

JOHN L. GRIFFITHS, an individual,

Defendant- Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:97-CV-1990-P)

January 3, 2000

Before POLITZ, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lloyd Petroleum Corporation and John L. Griffiths appeal trial court rulings

on their claims of res judicata, collateral estoppel and election of remedies, and

they contend that the trial court has permitted double recovery. Our review of the

record and briefs persuades beyond peradventure that this appeal presents no
2

reversible error and, accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is, in all respects,

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1429 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1429

 To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require publication on 
     the internet of the basis for determinations that species are 
   endangered species or threatened species, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 2019

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Lankford, 
 Mr. Risch, and Mr. Sullivan) introduced the following bill; which was 
  read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 
                                 Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require publication on 
     the internet of the basis for determinations that species are 
   endangered species or threatened species, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``21st Century Endangered Species 
Transparency Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO PUBLISH ON INTERNET BASIS FOR LISTINGS.

    Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 
1533(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(9) Publication on internet of basis for listings.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Except as provided in 
                subparagraph (B), the Secretary shall make publicly 
                available on the internet the best scientific and 
                commercial data available that are the basis for each 
                regulation, including each proposed regulation, 
                promulgated under subsection (a)(1).
                    ``(B) Exception.--At the request of a Governor or 
                legislature of a State, the Secretary shall not make 
                available under subparagraph (A) information regarding 
                which the State has determined public disclosure is 
                prohibited by a law of that State relating to the 
                protection of personal information.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE v. HARRINGTON

No. 135 PC.

Case below: 17 N.C. App. 221.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 6 March 1973.
#### STATE v. VANCE

No. 80 PC.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 92.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 May 1975.
Exhibit 99.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted),  Michael P. Perikly,  Chief Financial Officer of International Leisure
Hosts,  Ltd.  (the  "Company"),  hereby  certifies  that,  to  the  best  of his
knowledge:

1.       The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June
         30, 2003, to which this  Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the
         "Quarterly  Report"),  fully complies with the  requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.       The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,  in
         all  material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
         operations  of the  Company  at the end of the  period  covered  by the
         Quarterly  Report and  results of  operations  of the  Company  for the
         period covered by the Quarterly Report.




/s/ Michael P. Perikly

Michael P. Perikly
President and Chief Financial Officer
August 4, 2003













                                  Page 17 of 19
jf otirtlj Court of

&art Sliitomo,

March 27, 2014

No. 04-13-00468-CR

Thomas Joseph Keating.

Appellant

v.

The Slate ofI'cxas,

Appellee

Trial Court Case No. 201 1-1925-C2

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and has determined that oral

argument will not significantly aid il in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and [he

cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on May 7. 2014, to the following panel: Justice

Angelini, Justice Marion, and Justice Alvarez. All parlies will be notified of the Court's decision

in this appeal in accordance with Tr.x. R. API1. P. 48.

Either party may (11c motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that

oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues

presenled in the appeal. See Tex. R. Al'P. I1. 39.8. Such motion should be fded within ten (10)

days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on March 27. 2014.

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, have hereunto set my hand and a/fixed the seal court on this March 27, 2014.the said

e. Clerk;

vfoF^y
<PAGE>

Exhibit 3(c)


As adopted by the Board of
Directors of The Advest Group,
Inc. on September 28, 1995


                             SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                             RESTATED BY-LAWS OF
                            THE ADVEST GROUP, INC.
                                      


     RESOLVED, that Article III, Section 4 of the Bylaws of the Corporation
be, and it hereby is, amended in its entirety to read as follows:

          SECTION 4.  Qualification.  Directors shall be stockholders.  Any
     person elected as a Director who is not at the time of election a
     stockholder, shall have a period of six months from the date of election
     to satisfy the requirement of stock ownership.  If, at the end of said
     six month period, the Director has not become an owner of the common
     stock of the Corporation, he shall cease to be a Director.  No person
     shall be eligible for election or reelection as a Director after such
     person has reached his or her 71st birthday.  Nor shall any person be
     appointed as a Director to fill any vacancy after such person has
     reached his or her 71st birthday.

                                  -29-
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 19

- 00170

- CV

_ ___________________

_______

On Appeal from the 67th District Court Tarra nt County, Texas Trial Court No

. 067

- 306116

- 19

AND 

### C RUZ 

### V ENZOR AND 

### J UANA 

### M UNOZ 

### , Appellants

V



### . AMG BT N OTE 

### O NE 

### , LLC AND 

### A UGUST 

### REI H OLDINGS 

### , LLC , Appell ees2 _ __________________________ No. 02

- 19

- 00177

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 67th District Co u rt Tarrant Co unty, Texas Trial Cour t No. 067

- 297732

- 18

Before Womack J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Wall ach, J

. P er Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### C RUZ 

### V ENZOR AND 

### J UANA 

### M UNOZ 

### , Appellants

V



### . AMG BT N OTE 

### O NE 

### , LLC , Appe l lee3 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
This court has previously dismissed these now

- consolidated appeals in separate opini o n s issued on July 30, 2019

. Venzor v. AMG BT Note One, LLC , No. 02

- 19

- 00170

- CV, 2019 WL 34 36608 , at *1 (Tex. A pp.

— Fort Worth July 30, 2019 , no pet. ) ; Venzor v. AMG BT Note One, LLC , No. 02

- 19

- 0017 7

- CV, 2019 WL 343660 9 , at *1 (Tex. App.

— For t Worth July 30, 2019 )

. In our previous opinions, we stated that we

were dismiss ing these appeals because after we had informed appellants that they had not arranged to pay for the clerk ’s record , as appellate rules required , these appeals
would be dismissed for want of p rose cuti on . A ppellants still made no arran gements to pay for the clerk ’s record in either appeal . Thus, w e dis missed them both for want of prosec ution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). On August 14, 20 19, a ppellant s filed motions for re h eari ng i n both appeals , and this court, ov er expressed reservations regarding the explana tions given by
ap pella nts , reinstated both appeals “in the interest of justice

. ” Shortly afte r, appellants
filed a motion to consolidate bot h appeals, which this cou r t gr ante d. In our order

cons olidating these cases, we instructed appellants that it was incumbent upon appellant s to pay for a single clerk ’s record to be filed for the se appeals by Sep tembe r 25, 2019. The clerk’s record was paid for, received by th is c o urt on S eptember 24, 2019 , and a ppellants’ briefing deadline for these appeals was set for October 24, 2019.4

Appel lants did not file a brief on or before October 24, 2019

. On October 31, 2019, a ppellee s filed a motion asking this court to dismiss th ese cons olid ated appeal s for want of prosecution. App ell ants h ave not responded to t his motion , and
app ellants have still not filed a brief

. Because appellant s ha ve failed to file a brief , we dismiss the se appeal s for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P . 38 .8(a )(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: November 2 1 , 2019
SECRETARY OF LABOR
SEP 23 2004 WASHINGTON

MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND
AGENCIES

FROM: ELAINE. HATS Charo

SUBJECT: — Safety, Health and Return-to-Employment (SHARE) Initiative

We are nearing the close of the first year of the three-year SHARE initiative, promoting
the Safety, Health and Return-to-Employment of Federal workers injured on the job. In
January, President Bush committed the administration to improved safety and health in
the Federal workplace and asked me to lead the initiative across government. On
January 15, I announced the four SHARE goals that would be the focus of our efforts:

¢ Reduction in total case rates for injuries and illnesses

¢ Reduction in case rates for lost time injuries and illnesses

* Improvement of the timeliness of filing notices of injury and illness

¢ Reduction in the rates of lost production days due to injuries and illnesses.

Federal agencies were invited to set their own challenging annual targets for the three
years of the initiative against FY 2003 baselines. The Occupational Safety and Health
Administration and the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP) have
worked closely to raise awareness and understanding of the four SHARE goals, help
agencies measure their progress, and give assistance in the form of training and
information. Many Federal agencies have made significant improvements against the
targets they chose, especially in timely reporting of injuries and illnesses to OWCP. At
the end of the 34 quarter, agencies overall were well ahead of the target improvement
of 5% over the FY 2003 mark in timely reporting.

As I prepare to report our first year’s progress to the White House -- and as all Federal
agencies engage in planning for FY 2005 and beyond -- I urge you to look at your
agency’s performance under each of the SHARE goals and recommit to significant
improvement in the next two years. With the experience of the last eight months, we
are all now in an excellent position to reach for a greater measure of accomplishment in
the coming years. The need has not diminished. The most recent chargeback bills sent
to agencies for their injury compensation costs totaled $2.5 billion, and injuries continue
at a pace of over 160,000 each year.


By September 30, 2004, I am asking each of you to notify John L. Henshaw, Assistant
Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health (202-693-2000), of any increases
you believe would be appropriate in your SHARE targets for FY 2005 and FY 2006. I
strongly urge that you challenge your organizations to reach for substantially greater
improvements against these critical goals than the minimum levels set forth in my
memorandum of January 15, 2004 (attached). In light of the successes most agencies
have already achieved, and in light of the critical importance of the health, safety and
productivity of the Federal workforce, I hope you will give serious attention to raising
some or all of your goals for the coming two years.

Attachment

cc: Designated Safety and Health Officials
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF
THE TRUSTEE*
OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as explained in Note 3
to the Trusts financial statements, in accordance with Securities and Exchange
Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 47, released September 16, 1982, the Trust
prepares its financial statements in a manner that differs from generally accepted
accounting principles; such presentation is customary to other royalty trusts); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
 COMPASS BANK, AS TRUSTEE OF THE
SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTBy:
Name:
    
    /s/ Lee Ann Anderson

Lee Ann AndersonTitle:
    
    Vice President and Senior Trust OfficerDate:
    
    March 1, 2011
 
 *
    
    The Trust has no executive officers.