70842 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2005 / Notices 

development and demonstration (RD&D) 

permits (69 FR 13242). This rule allows 

for variances from specified criteria for 

a limited period of time, to be 

implemented through State-issued 

RD&D permits. RD&D permits are only 

available in States with approved 

MSWLF permit programs which have 

been modified to incorporate RD&D 

permit authority. While States are not 

required to seek approval for this new 

provision, those States that are 

interested in providing RD&D permits to 

owners and operators of MSWLFs must 

seek approval from U.S. EPA before 

issuing such permits. Approval 

procedures for new provisions of 40 

CFR part 258 are outlined in 40 CFR 

239.12. 

Illinois MSWLF permit program was 

approved on January 3, 1994 (59 FR 86). 

On September 21, 2005, Illinois applied 

for approval of its RD&D permit 

provisions. Illinois submitted its rules 

under R05–1 for review. 

B. Decision 

After a thorough review, U.S. EPA 

Region 5 is proposing that Illinois’

RD&D permit provisions as defined 

under Illinois rule R05–1 are adequate 

to ensure compliance with the Federal 

criteria as defined at 40 CFR 258.4. 

Authority: This action is issued under the 

authority of section 2002, 4005 and 4010(c) 

of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended, 

42 U.S.C. 6912, 6945 and 6949(a). 

Dated: November 16, 2005. 

Norman Niedergang, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 05–23228 Filed 11–22–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Public Information Collections 

Approved by Office of Management 

and Budget 

November 10, 2005. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission (FCC) has received Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) 

approval for the following public 

information collections pursuant to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13. An agency may not 

conduct or sponsor and a person is not 

required to respond to a collection of 

information unless it displays a 

currently valid control number. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

J. Laurenzano, Federal Communications 

Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20554, (202) 418–1359 

or via the Internet at plaurenz@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control No.: 3060–0526. 

OMB Approval Date: 10/26/2005. 

Expiration Date: 10/31/2008. 

Title: Density Pricing Zone Plans, 

Expanded Interconnection with Local 

Telephone Company Facilities, CC 

Docket No. 91–141. 

Form No.: N/A. 

Estimated Annual Burden: 17 

responses; 816 total annual burden 

hours; approximately 48 hours average 

per respondent. 

Needs and Uses: The Commission 

requires Tier 1 Local Exchange Carriers 

(LECs) to provide expanded 

opportunities for third-party 

interconnection with their interstate 

special access facilities. The LECs are 

permitted to establish a number of rate 

zones within study areas in which 

expanded interconnection is 

operational. In the Fifth Report and 

Order in CC Docket No. 96–262, the 

Commission allows price cap LECs to 

define the scope and number of zones 

within a study area. These LECs must 

file and obtain approval of their pricing 

plans which will be used by FCC staff 

to ensure that the rates are just, 

reasonable and nondiscriminatory. 

OMB Control No.: 3060–0742. 

OMB Approval Date: 11/01/2005. 

Expiration Date: 11/30/2008. 

Title: Telephone Number Portability 

(47 CFR Part 52, Subpart C, Sections 

52.21–52.33) and CC Docket No. 95–

116. 

Form No.: N/A. 

Estimated Annual Burden: 2,027 

responses; 14,333 total annual burden 

hours; approximately 2–149 hours 

average per respondent. 

Needs and Uses: 47 CFR Part 52, 

Subpart C implements the statutory 

requirement that local exchange carriers 

(LECs) and Commercial Mobile Radio 

Service (CMRS) providers provide local 

number probability (LNP). This 

collection is being revised to include the 

implementation of wireless carriers 

providing LNP. Wireline carriers began 

providing LNP in 1998. In a 

Memorandum Opinion and Order (FCC 

02–215) in CC Docket No. 95–116, the 

Commission extended the deadline for 

CMRS providers to offer LNP. Long-term 

number portability must be provided by 

LECs and CMRS providers in switches 

for which another carrier has made a 

specific request for number portability, 

according to the Commission’s 

deployment schedule. Carriers that are 

unable to meet the deadlines for 

implementing a long-term number 

portability solution are required to file 

with the Commission at least 60 days in 

advance of the deadline a petition to 

extend the time by which 

implementation in its network will be 

completed. 

Incumbent LECs may recover their 

carrier-specific costs directly related to 

providing long-term number portability 

by establishing in tariffs filed with the 

Commission certain number portability 

charges. Incumbent LECs are required to 

include many details in their cost 

support that are unique to the number 

portability proceeding pursuant to the 

Cost Classification Order. For instance, 

incumbent LECs must demonstrate that 

any incremental overhead costs claimed 

in their cost support are actually new 

costs incremental to and resulting from 

the provision of long-term number 

portability. Incumbent LECs are 

required to maintain records that detail 

both the nature and specific amount of 

these carrier-specific costs that are 

directly related to number portability, 

and those carrier-specific costs that are 

not directly related to number 

portability. 

OMB Control No.: 3060–0989. 

OMB Approval Date: 11/01/2005. 

Expiration Date: 11/30/2008. 

Title: Procedures for Applicants 

Requiring Section 214 Authorization for 

Domestic Interstate Transmission Lines 

Acquired Through Corporate Control, 47 

CFR Sections 63.01, 63.03 and 63.04. 

Form No.: N/A. 

Estimated Annual Burden: 86 

responses; 959 total annual burden 

hours; approximately 1.5–12 hours 

average per respondent. 

Needs and Uses: Procedures for 

Applicants Requiring Section 214 

Authorization for Domestic Interstate 

Transmission Lines Acquired Through 

Corporate Control are set forth for 

common carriers requiring authorization 

under section 214 of the 

Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended (Act), 47 U.S.C. 214, to acquire 

domestic interstate transmission lines 

through a transfer of control. Under 

section 214 of the Act, carriers must 

obtain Federal Communications 

Commission (FCC) approval before 

constructing, acquiring, or operating an 

interstate transmission line. 

Acquisitions involving interstate 

common carriers therefore require 

affirmative action by the FCC before the 

acquisition can occur. 

OMB Control No.: 3060–0770. 

OMB Approval Date: 11/07/2005. 

Expiration Date: 11/30/2008. 

Title: Price Cap Performance Review 

for Local Exchange Carriers, CC Docket 

No. 94–1 (New Services). 

Form No.: N/A. 

Estimated Annual Burden: 34 

responses; 170 total annual burden 

hours; approximately 5 hours average 

per respondent. 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 23, 2005 / Notices 70843 

Needs and Uses: In the Fifth Report 

and Order, the Commission permits 

price cap LECs to introduce new 

services on a streamlined basis, without 

prior approval. The Commission 

modified the rules to eliminate the 

public interest showing required by 

Section 69.4(g) and to eliminate the new 

services test (except in the case of loopbased new services) required under 

Sections 61.49(f) and (g). These 

modifications eliminated the delays that 

existed for the introduction of new 

services as well as to encourage efficient 

investment and innovation. 

The Commission no longer requires 

an incumbent LEC to introduce a new 

service by filing a waiver under Part 69 

of the Commission’s rules. Instead, 

incumbent LECs are allowed to file a 

petition for the new service based on a 

public interest standard. After the first 

incumbent LEC has satisfied the public 

interest requirement for establishing 

new rate elements for a new switched 

access service, other incumbent price 

cap LECs can file petitions seeking 

authority to introduce identical rate 

elements for identical new services, and 

their petitions will be reviewed within 

ten days. If the Common Carrier Bureau 

(now the Wireline Competition Bureau) 

does not act within the prescribed time, 

authority to establish the rate elements 

in question are deemed granted. In the 

event the Bureau denies an incumbent 

LEC’s initial petition, or a subsequent 

petition filed by another incumbent 

LEC, the petitioner must file a Part 69 

waiver petition. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05–22841 Filed 11–22–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information 

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the 

Federal Communications Commission 

for Extension Under Delegated 

Authority 

November 9, 2005. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995, Public Law 104–13. 

An agency may not conduct or sponsor 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act that does not 

display a valid control number. 

Comments are requested concerning (a) 

whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; and (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) comments should be 

submitted on or before January 23, 2006. 

If you anticipate that you will be 

submitting comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contact listed below as soon 

as possible. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit your 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) 

comments by e-mail or U.S. postal mail. 

To submit you comments by e-mail send 

them to: PRA@fcc.gov. To submit your 

comments by U.S. mail, mark it to the 

attention of Judith B. Herman, Federal 

Communications Commission, 445 12th 

Street, SW., Room 1–C804, Washington, 

DC 20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information about the 

information collection(s) send an e-mail 

to PRA@fcc.gov or contact Judith B. 

Herman at 202–418–0214. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control No.: 3060–0900. 

Title: Compatibility of Wireless 

Services with Enhanced 911; Second 

Report and Order, CC Docket No. 

94–102. 

Form No.: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Individuals or 

households, business or other for-profit, 

not-for-profit institutions, and state, 

local or tribal government. 

Number of Respondents: 140. 

Estimated Time Per Response: 20 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement. 

Total Annual Burden: 2,190 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: N/A. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A. 

Needs and Uses: The rules in this 

proceeding requires that analog cellular 

phones include a separate capability for 

processing 911 calls that permits those 

calls to be handled, where necessary, by 

either cellular carrier in the area. This 

rule applies to new handsets 

manufactured for sale in the United 

States after 02/13/00. The rulemaking 

also sets forth guidelines for 911 call 

completion methods that satisfy the 

Commission’s rules and approved three 

methods for compliance with the call 

completion rules, Automatic A/B 

Roaming-Intelligent Retry, Adequate/ 

Strongest Signal, and Selective Retry. 

Manufacturers may satisfy their 

requirement by selecting any one of 

these methods, all of which entail 

software or hardware modifications. 

This information submitted by 

manufacturers or carriers wishing to 

incorporate new or modified E911 call 

processing modes will be used to keep 

the Commission informed of 

technological developments and thus to 

ensure that the Commission’s 

regulations are kept current and reflect 

the preferences of the industry in 

complying with E911 call completion 

regulations. The rulemaking also 

supported as a voluntary measure (not 

a requirement) industry efforts to 

educate users of analog phones with 

regard to capabilities of the A over B, B 

over A, (A/B, B/A) logic for 911 calls. 

This approach would provide that all 

analog cellular calls, including 911 

calls, would be routed to the customer’s 

preferred carrier if a usable channel is 

available. If a channel is not available, 

the handset would automatically switch 

to a usable channel on the other cellular 

carrier’s system. The industry program 

to educate users should also inform 

customers of the possibility that an 

A/B, B/A approach could produce 

unexpected and wanted roaming 

charges in the case of ordinary calls. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05–22842 Filed 11–22–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information 

Collection(s) Being Submitted for 

Review to the Office of Management 

and Budget 

November 10, 2005. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the