alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 28-5 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 28-5 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 2 of 11 Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 26 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 28-5 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 3 of 11 Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 26 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 28-5 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 4 of 11 Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 26-2 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 28-5 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 5 of 11 Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 26-2 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 28-5 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 6 of 11 Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 26-2 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 28-5 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 7 of 11 Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 26-2 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 28-5 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 8 of 11 Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 26-2 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 28-5 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 9 of 11 Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 26-2 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 28-5 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 10 of 11 Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 26-2 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 28-5 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 11 of 11 Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 26-2 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 8 of 8
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 223 (Monday, November 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 70082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22940]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Human Development Training.
    Date: December 7, 2005.
    Time: 10:30 a.m to 11:30 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Carla T. Walls, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6898, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d5a2b4b9b9a6b695b8b4bcb9fbbbbcbdfbb2baa3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8afdebe6e6f9e9cae7ebe3e6a4e4e3e2a4ede5fc">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 10, 2005.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-22940 Filed 11-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          10,687,475
<SECURITIES>                                     4,892,199
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,638,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (15,725,390)
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,818,720
<PP&E>                                           2,077,919
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (352,145)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,451,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,718,901
<BONDS>                                         60,404,791
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            79,458
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,247,841
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,451,081
<SALES>                                         13,185,123
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,185,123
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,102,384
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,193,328
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                13,351,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,989,912
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (23,451,501)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (4,352,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (19,099,501)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (19,099,501)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (2,410)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (2,410)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.25
 AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED SEPARATION BENEFITS AGREEMENT
 Amendment Effective Date Executive Company
 RECITALS
 Agreement
  Section 409A
 AGREEMENT
  Amendment
 Release; Payments upon Termination of Employment
 Definition of Good Reason
 Section 7 of the Agreement




---



##### 



Section 409A
 separation from service
    Termination of Executive After a Change of Control
 2




---



##### 



Tax Withholding
  Other Terms and Conditions
  EXECUTIVE
    
    THORATEC CORPORATION/s/
David A. Lehman
    
    By:
    /s/ Gerhard F. BurbachDavid A. Lehman
    
    
    Name:
    Gerhard F. BurbachTitle:
    President & Chief Executive Officer
 3
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-1084

___________ Everick Lovosier Monk, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * District Court for the Department of Correction; Claud e * Eastern District of Arkansas. Wilburn, OCS: Printing & Graphic * Arts Supervisor, Wrightsville Unit, * Arkansas Department of Correction; * [UNPUBLISHED] David Guntharp, Assistant Director, * Arkansas Department of Correction; * Clifford Terry, Warden, Wrightsville * Unit, Arkansas Department of * Correction, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 28, 1999 Filed: June 7, 1999

___________ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The HONORABLE HENRY WOODS, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the HONORABLE HENRY L. JONES, JR., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- Arkansa s inmate Everick Lovosier Monk appeals from the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After carefully reviewing the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude dismissal was proper for the reasons the district court stated and an extended discussion is not warranted. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of Mosaic Nutriceuticals Corp. (“Mosaic”). The Commission is concerned that Mosaic and/or certain of its shareholders may have unjustifiably relied on Rule 144(k) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) in conducting an unlawful distribution of its securities that failed to comply with the resale restrictions of Rules 144 and 145 of the Securities Act. Mosaic, a company that has made no public filings with the Commission or the NASD, is quoted on the Pink Sheets under the ticker symbol MCNJ, and has been the subject of a spam e-mail touting the company's shares.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above listed company.

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. e.s.t. February 2, 2005 through 11:59 p.m. e.s.t., on February 15, 2005.

By the Commission.

Jill M. Peterson,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 05-2264 Filed 2-2-05; 1:19 pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Case 1:06-cv-15008-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### DAVE GODFREY, Administrator of the Estate of BRENDA MAE THOMAS v. *WILLIE*RUFUS SMITH.

(Filed 4 February, 1966.)

Appeal by defendant from *Nimocks, E.J., 5*April 1965 Civil Session of HARNETT.

Civil action by the duly appointed and qualified administrator of the estate of Brenda Mae Thomas to recover damages for the *403alleged wrongful prenatal death of Brenda Mae Thomas, a viable child *en ventre sa mere,*heard upon a demurrer to the complaint and the amended complaint.

The complaint and amended complaint allege in substance: On 5 July 1963 Brenda Mae Thomas was a viable child in her eighth month of gestation *en ventre sa mere;*that on that day there was a collision between an automobile driven by her mother and an automobile driven by defendant; that said collision was caused by the negligence of defendant in the operation of his automobile, and the acts of negligence by defendant are specifically alleged; and that as a proximate result of such collision Brenda Mae Thomas was killed, and was born dead on 9 July 1963.

Defendant demurred to the complaint and amended complaint on the following ground: The complaint and amended complaint do not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against defendant, in that it appears upon the face of the complaint and upon the face of the amended complaint that plaintiff’s alleged intestate was an unborn *foetus*at the time of her alleged death by wrongful act. The trial court overruled the demurrer and allowed defendant 30 days thereafter in which to answer. Defendant appealed.

*Teague, Johnson and Patterson by Robert M. Clay for defendant appellant.*

*Morgan and Williams by Ben T. DeBerry for plaintiff appellee.*

PARKER, J.

Defendant has ignored Rule 4(a), Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 254 N.C. 783, 784, in appealing instead of petitioning this Court for a writ of *certiorari.*However, under the particular circumstances here we have decided to pass on the appeal.

Decision in the instant case is controlled by the decision in *Gay, Administrator v. Dr. G. R. C. Thompson,*266 N.C. 394, 146 S.E. 2d 425, the opinion in which is filed contemporaneously with the opinion in this case. Upon authority of the decision in that case, the learned judge below erred in overruling the demurrer in the instant case. He should have sustained it, and dismissed the action. The judgment below is

Reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           Sep-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                             PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>               2,268,220
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>               364,030
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                    255,933
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                  158,257
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          3,046,440
<COMMON>                                  449,697
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                  (1,668)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                       438,284
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>            885,727
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          62
<PREFERRED>                                39,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                      696,684
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                         16,774
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>             84,900
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>             189,248
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                  50,000
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>          1,083,459
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>           3,046,440
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                 708,339
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                       54,767
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                532,625
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                587,392
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                   120,947
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                          4,173
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>            125,120
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   50,642
<NET-INCOME>                               74,478
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                 2,875
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>              71,603
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                   77,063
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                  39,009
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                     74,696
<EPS-BASIC>                                1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                1.16


</TABLE>
# Airman Accounted for from WWII (Stevens, H.)

/ Published Jan. 30, 2024
WASHINGTON, 
The Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) announced today that U.S. Army Air Forces Staff Sgt. Henry L. Stevens, 23, of Monroe, Louisiana, killed during World War II, was accounted for Sept 15, 2023.

In late 1944, Stevens was assigned to the 557th Bombardment Squadron, 387th Bombardment Group, Ninth U.S. Air Force, in the European Theater of Operations. On Dec. 23, Stevens was a crewmember aboard a B-26F “Marauder” aircraft, nicknamed *Shirley D*, which was shot by anti-aircraft fire over Bitburg, Germany, while returning from a bombing raid. Witness reported *Shirley D* took damage to the right engine, resulting in a massive fire which forced crewmen to bail out. Survivors watched *Shirley D* crash near Winville, Belgium, with several crewmembers, including Stevens, still onboard.

A few days after the crash, several Belgian residents recovered one set of remains from the crash site near Houmont and turned them over to American forces operating in the area. American Graves Registration Service (AGRS) personnel initially identified the pilot, while the other set of remains remained Unknown. By Dec. 26, 1944, everyone from Stevens’s aircraft had been identified and accounted for except for Stevens, and he was declared non-recoverable.

In 2013, DPAA personnel returned to the crash site near Winville, Belgium, where they recovered materials associated with the crashed B-26. Later in 2019, while working in conjunction with researchers from the University of Wisconsin, possible remains were located and sent to the DPAA laboratory for testing and possible identification.

To identify Stevens’s remains, scientists from DPAA used anthropological analysis. Additionally, scientists from the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System used mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and autosomal DNA (auSTR) analysis.

Stevens’s name is recorded on the Tablets of the Missing at the Ardennes American Cemetery, an American Battle Monuments Commission site in Neupré, Belgium, along with others still missing from WWII. A rosette will be placed next to his name to indicate he has been accounted for.

Stevens will be buried on March 8, 2024, in Bushnell, Florida.

For family and funeral information, contact the Army Casualty Office at (800) 892-2490.

For additional information on the Defense Department’s mission to account for Americans who went missing while serving our country, visit the DPAA website at www.dpaa.mil or find us on social media at www.facebook.com/dodpaa or https://www.linkedin.com/company/defense-pow-mia-accounting-agency.

Stevens’s personnel profile can be viewed at https://dpaa-mil.sites.crmforce.mil/dpaaProfile?id=a0Jt000001nzat1EAA.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-13,444-13

IN RE DARIUS DURON ELAM, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 380350 IN THE 232nd DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contended that he obtained post-conviction DNA testing pursuant

to Chapter 64 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, that the results of such testing were returned

on February 19, 2014, but that the trial court has not conducted a hearing or made findings as to

whether, had the results been available during the trial of the offense, it is reasonably probable that

Relator would not have been convicted of the offense, as required by Article 64.04 of the Texas

Code of Criminal Procedure. Relator sought reliefin the Fourteenth Court of Appeals, which denied

Relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus because Relator had not demonstrated that a motion for
2

a hearing or findings was pending in the trial court or had been presented to the trial court, or that

the trial court has had reasonable time in which to rule on said motion. In re Elam, No. 14-14-

00826-CR (Tex. App. — Houston [14th Dist.] October 20, 2014).

On December 17, 2014, this Court held in abeyance and ordered the Harris County District

Clerk to respond as to whether or not Relator had filed a motion for the trial court to conduct a

hearing and make findings under Article 64.04 in Harris County. On January 6, 2015, this Court

received a motion from Relator, who is now represented by counsel, requesting that his mandamus

application be withdrawn. Because the Harris County District Clerk has not yet responded to this

Court’s abeyance order, Relator’s request to withdraw the mandamus application is hereby granted. 

No further response from the District Clerk is necessary. A copy of this order shall be sent to the

Harris County District Clerk.

 

Filed: May 20, 2015

Do not publish
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AutoInfo, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Wunderlich,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ William Wunderlich
------------------------
William Wunderlich
Chief Financial Officer
March 24, 2003
Exhibit 10.27
​
SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE
This is a Second Amendment to Lease dated as of October 1, 2021 by and between Bulfinch Square Limited Partnership, a Massachusetts limited partnership ("Landlord") and Leap Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Tenant").
WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease dated November 13, 2018, as amended by First Amendment to Lease dated August 17, 2021 (as so amended, the "Lease") with respect to certain premises at 47 Thorndike Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts; and
WHEREAS, Tenant wishes to delay until May 31 , 2022 the date by which it can give an Election Notice to extend the term of the Lease for the Extended Term; and
WHEREAS, Landlord is willing to agree to such a delay in return for an extension of the Original Tenn until January 31, 2023.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:
1.Capitalized terms used herein without definition, including in the foregoing recitals, shall have the meanings ascribed to them by the Lease.
2.Notwithstanding Section 2.3 of the Lease, the Election Notice may be given on or before May 31, 2022.
3.The Original Term shall be extended to expire on January 31, 2023.
4.Annual Fixed Rent for the period of May 2022 through January 2023 shall be $444,686.00 per annum (i.e. $37,057.17 for each month).
5.Tenant warrants and represents that it has dealt with no broker in connection with this Second Amendment to Lease, and that in the event of any brokerage claims or liens against Landlord or the Property predicated on dealings with Tenant, Tenant agrees to defend the same and to indemnify and hold Landlord harmless from any such claim and to discharge any such lien.
6.Except as herein amended the Lease is ratified and affirmed.
​




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have executed this First Amendment to Lease as of the date first set forth above.
	​


	​


	​



	​
	LANDLORD:

	​
	​

	​
	Bulfinch Square Limited Partnership

	​
	​

	​
	By:
	Courthouse Associates, Inc., its general partner

	​


	​


	​



	​


	​


	By:


	/s/ Kenneth Krozy



	​
	​
	Kenneth Krozy 

	​
	​
	Vice President



​
	​
	TENANT:

	​
	​

	​
	Leap Therapeutics, Inc.

	​
	​

	​
	BB By:
	/s/ DOUGLAS E. ONSI

	​
	​
	Nam . ouglas E. Onsi

	​
	​
	Title: President & CEO



​