alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.57 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 18 Filed 03/13/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 18 Filed 03/13/2008 Page 2 of 2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.47 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 7, 2009

p0430 

# Order

May 7, 2009

137527

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, as Trustee for BANKBOSTON HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1998-1, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137527 COA: 272431 Ct of Claims: 03-000057-MT DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and DEPARTMENT OF NA TURAL RESOURCES, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 9, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the plaintiff assignee of the mortgage on the property in question ha d standing to assert the due process rights of its assignor, which was formerly known as BankBoston, NA; and, if so, (2) whether BankBoston’s due process rights were violated by the defe ndants’ mailing of notic e to FNB – the entity into which BankBoston had merged and to which it had changed its name – at FNB’s address, rather than to the Boston address listed on BankBo ston’s mortgage assignment.
#### BRYANT v. KELLY

No. 3 PC.

Case below: 10 N.C. App. 208.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 3 March 1971.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           793,277
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          594,277
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            613,749
<EQUITIES>                                     113,028
<MORTGAGE>                                      11,793
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,688,410
<CASH>                                          23,257
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         310,879
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,987,734
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                275,250
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          1,178,867
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 404,745
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            7,113
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                235,981
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,384
<OTHER-SE>                                     492,613
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,987,734
<PREMIUMS>                                   1,240,713
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             99,400
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 721
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  20,014
<BENEFITS>                                   1,256,653
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                104,195
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,935
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             72,260
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    72,260
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.48
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 137,978
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            269,623
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                  332
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             173,937
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                71,654
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                162,342
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                         (5,507)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 214 (Monday, November 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 67501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22100]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB for 
Revision to a Currently Approved Collection; Comment Request

AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The NCUA is submitting the following information collection to 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35). This information collection is published to obtain 
comments from the public.

DATES: Comments will be accepted until January 6, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to 
the NCUA Clearance Officer listed below:
    Clearance Officer: Mr. Neil McNamara, National Credit Union 
Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428, Fax No. 
703-518-6669, E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1c717f727d717d6e7d5c727f697d327b736a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="137e707d727e726172537d7066723d747c65">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
a copy of the information collection request, should be directed to 
Tracy Sumpter at the National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke 
Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428, or at (703) 518-6444.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposal for the following collection of 
information:
    Title: Report of Officials.
    OMB Number: 3133-0053.
    Form Number: NCUA 4501.
    Type of Review: Revision to a currently approved collection.
    Description: 12 U.S.C. 1761--This statutory provision requires that 
a record of the names and addresses of the executive officers, members 
of the supervisory committee, credit committee, and loan officers shall 
be filed with the administration within 10 days of their election/
appointment.
    Respondents: Credit unions.
    Estimated No. of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 8,871.
    Estimated Burden Hours per Response: 1 hour.
    Frequency of Response: Annually.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 8,871 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: 0.

    By the National Credit Union Administration Board on November 1, 
2005.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-22100 Filed 11-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Jean Dufort BAPTICHON, Pla intiff-Cross-Claimant-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. NEVADA STATE BANK, Ronald Mulhall, Ian Clyne, Laura Doyle, Erik Kane Boyer, Ronald Plomgren, Richard Eberhart, Ronald Channels, Ron Carter, Yes Entertainment Network Inc., Tom Bosley, Defendants-Cross-Defendant-Appellees.

No. 04-4190-CV.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

April 13, 2005.

Jean Dufort Baptichon, Richmond Hill, NY, for Plaintiff-Cross-Claimant-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, pro se.

Jeffrey T. Golenbock, Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP, New York, N.Y. (Sydney R. Smith, Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP, New York, NY, on the brief, and Gardner Jolly and Martin A Little, Jolley Urga Wirth & Woodbury, Las Vegas, NV), for Defen*375dant-Appellee Nevada State Bank, of counsel.

PRESENT: CALABRESI, CABRANES Circuit Judges, and HALL, District Judge.*

*

The Honorable Janet C. Hall, United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-Appellant Jean Dufort Baptichon (“Baptichon”) appeals *from*an order of the district court (Garaufis, *J.)*granting Defendant-Appellee Nevada State Bank’s motion to dismiss and denying Baptichon’s motion to amend his complaint. We assume that the parties are familiar with the facts, the procedural history, and the scope of the issues presented on appeal.

Because the decision of the district court was based on the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Mann, *M.J.),*and because Baptichon did not file any timely objections to the report and recommendation, notwithstanding due notice by the magistrate judge that “[fjailure to file objections in a timely manner may waive a right to appeal the District Court order,” Baptichon has waived his right to appeal. *See DeLeon v. Strode,*284 F.3d 84, 86 (2d Cir.2000) (holding that failure to object in a timely fashion to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation generally constitutes a waiver of the defaulting party’s right to appeal, provided that the parties received clear notice of the consequences of their failure to object); *United States v. Male Juvenile (95-CR-1074-),*121 F.3d 34, 38-39 (2d Cir.1997); *see also Small v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs.,*892 F.2d 15, 16 (2d Cir.1989) (per curiam) (applying the waiver rule to *pro se*litigants). Because this waiver rule is non-jurisdictional, however, we may, in the interest of justice, excuse a party’s failure to object. *See Roldan v. Racette,*984 F.2d 85, 89 (2d Cir.1993); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 155, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Looking at the underlying claims in this case, we find no possibility of any injustice arising from our refusal to excuse Baptichon’s failure to object.

We have considered all of Baptichon’s contentions on appeal and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(n)


                     AMENDMENT OF 1992 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


1.  Article 8 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to
read as follows:

          8.  Awards to Non-employee Directors in Lieu of Regular Meeting
          Attendance Fees.

                 Each Non-employee Director shall have the right to make an
         annual election to receive Shares (a "Shares Election") in lieu of
         regular meeting attendance fees (excluding attendance fees for special
         meetings, committee meetings and telephonic meetings) earned for
         service on the Board in the year following receipt by the Company of a
         Shares Election.

                 8.1      Shares Election.  A Non-employee Director may make a
         Shares Election by written notice to the Secretary of the Company on
         or before each annual stockholders' meeting and such election shall be
         irrevocable and remain in effect for a one-year period which shall
         begin on the day of the annual stockholders' meeting and end on the
         day before the succeeding annual stockholders' meeting (the "Election
         Year").  Provided, however, a Non-employee Director who is elected or
         appointed to the Board at a time other than the annual stockholders'
         meeting may make a Shares Election by written notice to the Secretary
         of the Company within 10 days after the date his term begins and such
         election shall remain in effect for the remainder of the Election
         Year.

                 8.2      Issuance of Shares.  After each regular meeting of
         the Board, the Company shall award to each Non-employee Director who
         made a Shares Election and attended such meeting, a number of Shares
         (rounded to the nearest whole Share) determined by dividing the amount
         of the fee to which he would have otherwise been entitled for
         attendance at such meeting by the Fair Market Value of a Share on the
         date of such meeting.  Certificates for the Shares awarded shall be
         issued to the recipient Non-employee Director as soon as practicable
         and thereupon the recipient Non-employee Director shall have full
         voting, dividend and other ownership rights with respect to such
         Shares.

2.  Section 9.1 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to
read as follows:

                 9.1 The Plan shall terminate June 1, 2002, and no Options or
         awards of Shares may be granted thereafter.  The Board may sooner
         terminate or, except as otherwise provided herein, amend the Plan at
         any time and from time to time.




    ADOPTED BY PLAINS RESOURCES INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON FEBRUARY 6, 1997.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 219 (Tuesday, November 15, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69359-69360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22659]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting of the Board of Directors

Time and Date: The Board of Directors of the Legal Services Corporation 
will meet on November 28, 2005 via conference call. The meeting will 
begin at 12 p.m. (e.s.t.), and continue until conclusion of the Board's 
agenda.

Location: 3333 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20007, 3rd Floor 
Conference Room.

Status of Meeting: OPEN. Directors will participate by telephone 
conference in such a manner as to enable interested members of the 
public to hear and identify all persons participating in the meeting. 
Members of the public may observe the meeting by joining participating 
staff at the location indicated above.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Approval of the agenda.
    2. Consider and act on Board of Directors' response to the 
Inspector General's Semiannual Report to Congress for the period of 
October 1, 2004 through March 31, 2005.
    3. Consider and act on other business.
    4. Public comment.

Contact Person for Information: Patricia Batie, Manager of Board 
Operations, at (202) 295-1500.

[[Page 69360]]


Special Needs: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in 
alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend 
the meeting may notify Patricia Batie at (202) 295-1500.

    Dated: November 9, 2005.
Victor M. Fortuno,
Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Corporate 
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-22659 Filed 11-9-05; 4:29 pm]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
EXHIBIT
32(b)





Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C.
1350





In
connection with the Annual Report of MICROS Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Cynthia A. Russo,
Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration, and Chief Financial
Officer of MICROS Systems, Inc. (“Registrant”), certify that based on my
knowledge:




(1)  The
Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  The
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
      August 27, 2010
                /s/
                Cynthia A. RussoCynthia
      A. Russo
#### YOW v. NANCE

No. 185 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 419.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 June 1976.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6921

CHRISTOPHER ALAN BEAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

CHADWICK DOTSON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Roderick Charles Young, District Judge. (3:22-cv-00601-RCY-MRC)

Submitted: January 30, 2024 Decided: February 6, 2024

Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Alan Bean, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6921 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/06/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Alan Bean seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying Bean’s 

postjudgment motion for a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court’s order 

dismissing Bean’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as untimely. A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 

100, 115-17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that 

the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. 

Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bean has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6921 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/06/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
#### CABLE v. OIL CO.

No. 49 PC.

Case below: 10 N.C. App. 569.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 12 May 1971.