alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Charles Stidham, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  form  10-QSB  of The  X-Change
Corporation,

2.Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3.Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,   and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.The small business  issuer's other  certifying  officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in exchange act rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and
have:

a)designed  such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to the small  business  issuer,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report on such evaluation; and

c)disclosed  in this report any change in the small business  issuer's  internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business  issuer's  fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual  report) that has  materially  affected,  or is
reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the small business  issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.The small business  issuer's other  certifying  officers and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a)all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or  other
employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.


Date: May 20, 2005


/By:/s/ Charles Stidham

Charles Stidham, President and Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Case 1:06-cv-15013-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **0 -**  **1647**

I n R e: VICTOR PERKINS , Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

. ( 5:92

- hc

- 00654

- BR )

Submitted : July 22, 2010 Decided: July 30, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Victor Perkins , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Victor Perkins petitions for a writ of mandamus , alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his May 3, 2010 motion to vacate and dismiss the civil commitment. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to
act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that th e
district court denied the motion on May 24, 2010. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Perkins’ motion , we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Case 1:07-cr-00357-CM Document 53 Filed 06/16/2008 Page 1 of 1
Norman C. Kleinberg 

Theodore V. H. Mayer 

William J. Beausoleil 

HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP 

One Battery Park Plaza 

New York, New York 10004-1482 

(212) 837-6000 

Paul F. Strain 

M. King Hill, III 

David J. Heubeck 

VENABLE LLP 

Two Hopkins Plaza, Suite 1800 

Baltimore, Maryland 21201 

(410) 244-7400 

Attorneys for Defendant Merck & Co., Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

IN RE: FOSAMAX PRODUCTS ) 

LIABILITY LITIGATION ) 

__________________________________________) MDL NO. 1789 

This document relates to: ) 1:06-md-1789 (JFK) 

Jennifer Bogard and Robert Bogard ) 

v. Merck & Co., Inc. ) 

Case No: 1:07-cv-03295-JFK ) 

__________________________________________) 

NOTICE OF MOTION OF DEFENDANT MERCK & CO., INC. TO DISMISS 

WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE PLAINTIFF PROFILE FORM

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the Notice of Motion of Defendant Merck & 

Co., Inc., the Declaration of Theodore V. H. Mayer, and the accompanying Memorandum of 

Law in Support of its Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice for Failure to Provide Plaintiff Profile 

Form, Defendant Merck & Co., Inc. will move this Court before the Honorable Judge John F. 

Keenan, in the United States Courthouse for the Southern District of New York, for an Order 

dismissing the above referenced case with prejudice for failure to provide Plaintiff Profile Form. 

Case 1:07-cv-03295-JFK Document 3 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
 Page 2 

Dated: New York, New York 

 September 5, 2007 

Respectfully submitted, 

HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP 

By: /s/ 

Norman C. Kleinberg 

Theodore V. H. Mayer 

William J. Beausoleil 

One Battery Park Plaza 

New York, New York 10004-1482 

(212) 837-6000 

Paul F. Strain 

M. King Hill, III 

David J. Heubeck 

VENABLE LLP 

Two Hopkins Plaza, Suite 1800 

Baltimore, Maryland 21201 

(410) 244-7400 

Attorneys for Defendant Merck & Co., Inc.

Case 1:07-cv-03295-JFK Document 3 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DONALD A. WILLIAMS O/B/O

CEDRIC WARREN,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D23-1172

LT Case No. 2001-34902-CFAES

CORRECTED

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 19, 2023

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,

A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Donald A. Williams, Lake City, pro se.

Cedric Warren, Lake City, pro se.

No Appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition is dismissed with prejudice. See Durocher v. Singletary, 

623 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 1993); Pancoast v. Crews, 128 So. 3d 815 (Fla. 1st 

DCA 2013).
2

In accordance with State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla.1999), Cedric 

Warren is hereby barred from filing any pleading or permitting anybody to file 

any pleading on his behalf in this Court in any action, case, or matter, unless 

signed by a member of the Florida Bar. Mr. Warren has repeatedly filed 

frivolous pleadings and has been Spencer banned previously in the 

underlying Volusia County Circuit Court Case No. 2001-34902-CFAES. By 

permitting Donald A. Williams, who is not a member of the Florida Bar, to file 

on his behalf, Mr. Warren has violated this Court’s previous Spencer ban 

order. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any filings from or on 

behalf of Cedric Warren except those signed and filed by a member of the 

Florida Bar. The Clerk will summarily reject any future filings regarding the 

referenced case unless filed by a member in good standing of the Florida 

Bar. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough 

is enough.”).

It is further ordered that the Clerk of our Court forward a copy of this 

opinion to the Department of Corrections for appropriate action. 

PETITION DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; PETITIONER 

SANCTIONED.

EDWARDS, HARRIS and SOUD, JJ., concur.
Case 1:06-cv-14952-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14952-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14952-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14952-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14952-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14952-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14952-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14952-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14952-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14952-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14952-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14952-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14952-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Exhibit
4.11


 


DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES


 


The
following description of certain terms of Oncocyte Corporation (“Oncocyte”) common stock is a summary and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to (i) Oncocyte’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended, (ii) Oncocyte’s Amended and Restated Bylaw,
and (iii) the California General Corporation Law.


 


Common
Stock


 


The
Oncocyte Articles of Incorporation currently authorize the issuance of up to 230,000,000 shares of common stock, no par value. Each holder
of record of common stock is entitled to one vote for each outstanding share owned, on every matter properly submitted to the shareholders
for their vote; provided, that if any shareholder entitled to vote at a meeting at which directors are to be elected gives timely notice
of their intention to cumulate votes in the election of directors, shareholders may cumulate votes for the election of directors.


 


Subject
to the dividend rights of holders of any preferred stock that may be issued from time to time, holders of common stock are entitled to
any dividend declared by the Oncocyte Board of Directors out of funds legally available for that purpose.


 


Subject
to the prior payment of the applicable liquidation preference to holders of any preferred stock that may be issued from time to time,
holders of common stock are entitled to receive on a pro rata basis all remaining assets available for distribution to the holders of
common stock in the event of the liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of Oncocyte’s operations.


 


Holders
of common stock do not have any preemptive, subscription, redemption, or conversion rights. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions
applicable to the common stock. The rights, powers, preferences and privileges of holders of Oncocyte common stock will be subject to
those of the holders of any shares of Oncocyte preferred stock that may be issued in the future.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of The X-Change  Corporation on
Form 10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2003,  as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Charles Stidham,
President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Charles Stidham
Charles Stidham
President and Chief Executive and Accounting Officer, Treasurer
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)


August 18, 2003


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:06-cv-14950-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
US, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

EMPLOYMENT STANDARDS An~nNISTRATION 

Office of Workers' Compensation Programs 

September 15, 1977 No. 33 

INSURANCE CARRIERS AND SELF-INSURED EMPLOYERS UNDER THE 

LONGSHOREMEN'S AND HARBOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION ACT, AS 

AMENDED 

Subject: Revised and Additional Regulations for Administering the LHWCA and Related Statutes 

Proposals were published in the Federal Register on August 13, 

1976, for a number of changes in the LHWCA regulations. 

Numerous comments were received as a result, which were carefully considered, and revisions were made in the proposed 

regulations. 

Attached is a copy of the final rules as published in the 

Federal Register on September 9, 1977. They become effective 

on October 11, 1977. A section by section summary of the 

comments received after publication of the proposed regulations 

and of the action taken in response is provided on pages 

45300 and 45301 under th~ heading Supplementary Information. 

In connection with the revised §702.404, expanding the meaning 

of the term "physician," Form LS-1, Request for Examination 

and/or Treatment, has been revised to include reference to the 

fact that chiropractors and other medical practitioners are 

authorized as treating physicians, with some limitations of 

the former. Complete information regarding the use of this 

form is being issued as a separate industry notice, No. 35. 

These regulations may be reproduced for distribution by head 

offices of firms receiving this notice to their field units 

affected by the changes. 

~-~T:L~ 

Associate Director for Longshore 

and Harbor Workers' Compensation 

Attachment 

Include your addreu 1 ZIP code, and file numher on alt corrupondmce
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5450 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5450

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 15, 2010

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 3894 Crenshaw Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the ``Tom 
                    Bradley Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TOM BRADLEY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3894 Crenshaw Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Tom Bradley Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Tom 
Bradley Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.

                               By Deborah M. Spriggs,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.1 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
* This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

** Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10825 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ARDELBERT MITCHELL, also known as Day Day, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:98-CR-23-1

- - - - - - - - - - February 10, 1999 Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. *
PER CURIAM: ** Ardelbert Mitchell appeals his sentence for distribution of cocaine base within 1,000 feet of a public housing facility. Mitchell contends that the district court abused its discretion by denying him a downward departure. We lack jurisdiction to review a defendant’s challenge to his sentence based upon mere dissatisfaction with the court’sNo. 98-10825 -2- refusal to grant a downward departure. United States v. DiMarco ,

46 F.3d 476, 477 (5th Cir. 1995). A refusal to depart downward is a violation of law only if the district court mistakenly assumed that it lacked the authority to depart. United States v. Burleson , 22 F.3d 93, 95 (5th Cir. 1994). The district court did not mistakenly assume that it lacked the authority to depart. Accordingly, his appeal is DISMISSED.
* The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-2044

___________ Wayne Allen Berry, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * Leonard Graves, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 15, 2003 Filed: January 22, 2003

___________ Before LOKEN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Wayne Allen Berry appeals the district court’s * denial of Berry’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas relief. Berry claims his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the prosecutor’s alleged references to Berry’s post-arrest silence during closing argument. Having carefully reviewed the record, we believe the district court correctly agreed with the state court’s decision that the prosecutor’s comments did not violate Berry’s right to silence. Three of the prosecutor’s-2- statements were permissible references to Berry’s pre-arrest silence. Vick v. Lockhart , 952 F.2d 999, 1003 (8 th Cir. 1991). The prosecutor’s fourth statement, that Berry had “eighty-eight days . . . in jail . . . to concoct his story and make it look goodwhen he gets up and testifies,” was not an impermissible reference to Berry’s postarrest silence. Catches v. United States , 582 F.2d 453,458 (8 thCir. 1978). Because the state court reasonably concluded that defense counsel’s failure to object to the prosecutor’s comments was not ineffective assistance, we affirm the judgment of the district court. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.