alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7353

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DEMOND ANDRE JACKSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers,

District Judge. (CR-99-15-3; CA-01-31-3)

Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 5, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey M. Brandt, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Michael Lee

Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Demond Jackson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. Jackson cannot

appeal this order unless a circuit judge or justice issues a

certificate of appealability, and a certificate of appealability

will not issue absent a “substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A habeas

appellant meets this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

326 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude Jackson has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
' 

ELE~'~RONIC~LLY FILED 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT C:O~T 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

ORDER 

IN KE: 

Fosarnax Products Liability Litigation 

This Docirment Rckutes to All Cases 

- 

I'I' IS HEREBY ORDERED that Mike Miller of the firm Solberg, Stewart, Millcr & 

Tjon, located at 1129 5"' Avenue South, Fargo, ND 58103, he, and in the sanic hcrchy is, 

Case No: 1 :Oh-MD-1789 

admitted Pro Hur I,'rr.ta as it pertains to the above-referenced ljtigatiorl of this Courl. 

DATED this .!L ' day of May. 20C)S. 

>, , -, -; .' 

BY: ,:( I< . b, , 77(' (- a c=/. ,i 

- ' JOHN F. KEENAN . 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:07-cv-03294-JFK Document 27 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 1 of 2
A0 13hA {Kcv.9!98) Certificate of Good Standing 

United States District Court 

District of North Dakota 

CERTIFICATE OF 

GOOD STANDING 

I, Robert Anslcy, Clerk of this Court, certif). thal 

Mike Miller was duly admitted to 

practicc in this Court on March 9, 1970, 

and is in good standing in this Court. 

Dated at Fargo. Nnrth Ihkota on May 1, 2008. 

Robert finslc\: , 

Clcrk 

, , -. ', ,& 

.C , ..-c ( . , ,: ; ; [. r 

! Dq' Deput), C:lcik - 1,cah Riveland-Foster 

Case 1:07-cv-03294-JFK Document 27 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-95615, No. 333-17725, No. 333-05125, No.
33-69782, No. 33-44481, No. 33-33535, No.333-52844, and No. 333-55816) of MICROS
Systems, Inc. of our report dated August 28, 2001 relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedule, which appear in this Form 10K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

McLean, Virginia
September 27, 2001





                                       56
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP     Document 22      Filed 10/26/2006     Page 1 of 2

Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP     Document 22      Filed 10/26/2006     Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. GILLESPIE

No. 1 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 520.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 31 January 1977. Notice of appeal withdrawn by defendant.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Strategic Internet
  Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
  March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
  hereof (the "Report"). I, Abbas Salih, Chief Financial Officer of the company,
  certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | 3. | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | 4. | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of the Company.

|Date: | May
      19, 2004 |  | /s/
      Abbas Salih     
|----- | ------------------ |  | --------------------------
|      |                    |  | Abbas Salih, CFO, Director



---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,981
<OTHER-SE>                                    (75,981)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0





</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                                 Grey Wolf, Inc.
                              List of Subsidiaries


<Table>
<Caption>
                                                         State or Jurisdiction of Formation
                                                         ----------------------------------
<S>                                                     <C>

Grey Wolf Drilling Company L.P.                                         Texas
Grey Wolf LLC                                                           Louisiana
Grey Wolf Holdings Company                                              Nevada
Murco Drilling Corp.                                                    Delaware
Grey Wolf International, Inc.                                           Texas
Grey Wolf Drilling International, Ltd.                                  Cayman Islands
Grey Wolf Drilling de Venezuela                                         Venezuela
Drillers Inc., DI de Venezuela                                          Venezuela
Grey Wolf Drilling de Mexico SRL de C.V.                                Mexico SRL
DI/Perfensa, Inc.                                                       Texas
Perforaciones Andinas, S.A.                                             Panama
DI Energy, Inc.                                                         Texas
</Table>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5565 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

5014 Gary Avenue in Lubbock, Texas, as the ‘‘Sergeant Chris Davis 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 22, 2010 

Mr. NEUGEBAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 5014 Gary Avenue in Lubbock, Texas, as 

the ‘‘Sergeant Chris Davis Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 5014 Gary Avenue in Lubbock, Texas, shall be 

6 known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Chris Davis Post 

7 Office’’. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5565 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘Sergeant Chris Davis Post Office’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 29, 2015

p0921 

# Order

Clerk September 29, 2015

150510(61)

TAMARA FILAS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 150510

COA: 316822

Wayne CC: 12

- 016693

- NF

MEEMIC INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant

- Appellee.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 28, 2015

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
#### SIMMS v. STORES, INC.

No. 113 PC.

Case below: 18 N.C. App. 188.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 12 July 1973.
#### JONES v. PRODUCTS, INC.

No. 65 PC.

Case below: 35 N.C. App. 170.

Petition by defendant Silver’s Enterprises, Inc. for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 May 1978.
#### STATE v. BOBBY LOWERY.

(Filed 21 September, 1966.)

Obscenity—

An intentional indecent exposure of tbe person while sitting in an automobile on a public street, in such manner as to be seen by members of the passing public using the street, constitutes the common law offence of indecent exposure.

Appeal by defendant from *Farthing, J.,*June 1966 Session of McDowell.

Criminal action charging one Bobby Lowery with indecent exposure. G.S. 14-190. The State offered evidence tending to show that Mrs. Judy Lytle was walking near Baldwin Avenue, in the city of Marion with her six-year old child. Defendant drove, his- car on Baldwin Avenue within three or four feet of Mrs. Lytle and engaged her in conversation. At the same time he slid over toward Mrs. Lytle and she observed that he did not have pants on. Defendant had his hand on his private part and shook it at her. Defendant offered evidence tending to establish an “alibi.”

Verdict: Guilty.

Defendant excepted and appealed to Supreme Court, assigning errors.

*Attorney General Bruton, Deputy Attorney General McGalliard, and Assistant Attorney General Bulloch for the State.*

*Everett C. Carnes and I. C. Crawford for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s principal contention is that the court should have granted his motion for nonsuit at the conclusion of the State’s evidence, principally on the ground that this was not a public place.

Intentional exposure of private parts while sitting in an. automobile on a public street in such manner that they could be seen by members of the passing public using the street, and were seen by a passerby, constitutes the common law offence of indecent exposure. *Noblett v. Commonwealth,*194 Va. 241, 72 S.E. 2d 241; *State v. Edwards,*233 N.C. 492, 64 S.E. 2d 421.

State’s witnesses positively identified the defendant as the person who exposed his private parts in a public place.

The defendant noted several exceptions to the court’s rulings on evidentiary matters and to portions of the charge to the jury. Upon examination we find none of them of substantial merit.

The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and we find

No error.
| Steven      Helmers, Esq.    | Christopher      Reitz, Esq. |
|------------------------------|------------------------------|
| Black      Hills Corporation | Aquila,      Inc.            |
| 625      Ninth Street        | 20      West Ninth Street    |
| Rapid      City, SD 57709    | Kansas      City, MO 64105   |

|   | Re: | Partnership      Interests Purchase Agreement and Asset Purchase Agreement (collectively,      the "Agreements") by and among Aquila, Inc. ("Aquila"), Black Hills      Corporation ("Black Hills"), Great Plains Energy Incorporated ("Great      Plains") and Gregory Acquisition Corp.  ("Gregory") |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Very      truly yours,Great      Plains Energy Incorporated                             |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  By:      /s/ Mark G. EnglishName:      Mark G. EnglishTitle:      General Counsel |

----

| Name:  | Steven      J. Helmers |
|--------|------------------------|
| Title: | General      Counsel   |

| Name:  | Christopher      Reitz |
|--------|------------------------|
| Title: | General      Counsel   |

| Name:  | Mark      G. English         |
|--------|------------------------------|
| Title: | Secretary      and Treasurer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          134,181
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,981
<OTHER-SE>                                   (210,162)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               134,181
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (134,181)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (138,181)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.001)



</TABLE>
# L_2007133EN.01002301.xml

| 25.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 133/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 133/23

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 572/2007

of 24 May 2007

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 38/2007

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 of 17 January 2007 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale for export of sugar held by the intervention agencies of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 of 17 January 2007 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale for export of sugar held by the intervention agencies of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 23 May 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 23 May 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 23 May 2007, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 shall be 403,00 EUR/tonne.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 May 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 May 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 247/2007 (OJ L 69, 9.3.2007, p .3).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 11, 18.1.2007, p. 4. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 203/2007 (OJ L 61, 28.2.2006, p. 3).

2

---
Case 1:07-cr-00352-PAC     Document 8      Filed 06/20/2007     Page 1 of 1
#### CHEATHAM v. DILLAHUNT

No. 136 PC.

Case below: 45 N.C. App. 713.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 June 1980.
#### STATE v. TURNAGE

No. 107 PC.

Case below: 35 N.C. App. 774.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 May 1978.
Document

Exhibit 10.18

FIFTH AMENDMENT OF CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL LEASE AGREEMENT


    THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT OF CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL LEASE AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into this 13th day of January 2022, by and between Spyglass Tesla, LLC (“Landlord”) and VIZIO, Inc. (formerly known as V, Inc.), a California corporation (“Tenant”).
    
Landlord and Tenant hereby agree as follows:


1.    The California Commercial Lease Agreement between the parties dated January 29, 2007 (the “Lease”), which relates to the Premises located at


39 Tesla
Irvine, CA  92618


is hereby amended as follows:


a.    In Paragraph 1.A of the Lease, Term, the expiration date of January 31, 2022, is deleted and replaced with January 31, 2027.


b.    All prior addendums are replaced by Exhibit “A” attached herewith.


2.    Except as expressly amended above, the Lease remains in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Standard Amendment of Lease on the date first written above.


LANDLORD                        TENANT






By:    /s/ Paul Wang                    By:     /s/ Adam Townsend            


Name:     Paul Wang                    Name: Adam Townsend


Title:     Manager                    Title: CFO


Date:     1/13/2022                    Date:     1/13/2022                









Exhibit 10.18

Exhibit “A”


ADDENDUM “A” (Effective February 1, 2022)


This revised addendum is for the California Commercial Lease Agreement Dated January 29, 2007, between VIZIO, Inc. (formerly V, Inc., the "Tenant") and Spyglass Tesla, LLC (the "Landlord") for property located at 39 Tesla, Irvine, California 92618.


Starting February 1, 2022, the new Monthly payment shall be as follows: