alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Thoratec Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending January 1, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey M. McCormick,
Corporate Controller and principal financial officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Jeffrey M. McCormick
---------------------------

Jeffrey M. McCormick
principal financial officer
March 16, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1644

In Re: TERRENCE MAURICE WHITAKER,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:08-cv-00702-TDS-DPD)

Submitted: October 21, 2009 Decided: November 16, 2009

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrence Maurice Whitaker, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Terrence Maurice Whitaker petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) habeas corpus petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act.

Our review of the district court’s docket sheet reveals that the district court entered a final order and judgment granting summary judgment in favor of the respondent, dismissing the petition, and denying a certificate of appealability on September 30, 2009. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Whitaker’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### BRITT v. SMITH

No. 73 PC.

Case below: 6 N.C. App. 117.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 18 November 1969.
#### MCA, INC. v. TAPE CORP.

No. 40 PC.

Case below: 19 N.C. App. 218.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 November 1973.
1

The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-2866

___________

Michael Newhouse, *

*

Appellant, *

*

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Western

* District of Missouri.

Ford Motor Company, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: November 30, 2001

Filed: December 13, 2001 

___________

Before BOWMAN, BRIGHT, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Michael Newhouse appeals the district court's1

 order granting Ford Motor

Company's motion to enforce a settlement agreement. Because Newhouse failed to

carry his burden to show that his attorney lacked authority to enter into the settlement,

see Turner v. Burlington N. R.R. Co., 771 F.2d 341, 345-46 (8th Cir. 1985), we affirm

the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny appellee's pending

motion as moot.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 6, 2019

No. 04-19-00066-CV

IN RE ALLIED PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CV-02309

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

The Real Parties in Interests’ Unopposed Second Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Their Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus is hereby GRANTED. The response is 

deemed filed.

It is so ORDERED on March 6, 2019.

 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
#### STATE v. DOUGLAS

No. 58 PC.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 731.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 May 1980. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 6 May 1980.
CÁC NGƯỠNG GIỚI HẠN VỀ QUYỀN TÀI PHÁN

SẮC LỆNH 11246

VẬT TƯ VÀ DỊCH VỤ

Phạm Vi Áp Dụng Cơ Bản

Bất kỳ

số nhân viên

+Hợp đồng nào 

trị giá $10,000

Phạm vi áp dụng AAP

50

hoặc hơn 

nhân viên

+ Hợp đồng trị giá

$50,000 trở lên

XÂY DỰNG Phạm Vi Áp Dụng Cơ Bản

Bất kỳ

số nhân viên

+

Hợp đồng nào 

trị giá $10,000

16 QUY ĐỊNH

Bất kỳ

số nhân viên

+Hợp đồng nào 

trị giá $10,000

MỤC 503

VẬT TƯ VÀ DỊCH VỤ

Phạm Vi Áp Dụng Cơ Bản

Bất kỳ

số nhân viên

+

Hợp đồng trị giá 

hơn $15,000

Phạm vi áp dụng AAP

50

hoặc hơn

nhân viên

+ Hợp đồng trị giá

$50,000 trở lên

XÂY DỰNG Phạm Vi Áp Dụng Cơ Bản

Bất kỳ

số nhân viên

+

Hợp đồng trị giá

hơn $15,000

Phạm vi áp dụng AAP

hoặc hơn

50

nhân viên

+ Hợp đồng trị giá

$50,000 trở lên

VEVRAA

VẬT TƯ VÀ DỊCH VỤ

Phạm Vi Áp Dụng Cơ Bản

Bất kỳ

số nhân viên

+

Hợp đồng trị giá

$150,000 trở lên

Phạm vi áp dụng AAP

50

hoặc hơn

nhân viên

+

Hợp đồng trị giá

$150,000 trở lên

XÂY DỰNG Phạm Vi Áp Dụng Cơ Bản

Bất kỳ

số nhân viên

+Hợp đồng trị giá

$150,000 trở lên

Phạm vi áp dụng AAP

hoặc hơn

50

nhân viên

+ Hợp đồng trị giá

$150,000 trở lên

Vui lòng lưu ý các yêu cầu về phạm vi bảo hiểm đối với Mục 503 và VEVRAA không áp dụng cho các nhà thầu xây dựng 

được nhận trợ cấp của liên bang. Ngoài ra, cả Mục 503 và VEVRAA đều phải tuân thủ một điều luật của liên bang 

điều chỉnh một số ngưỡng giới hạn về số tiền liên quan đến trưng thu vì lạm phát.

Vui lòng lưu ý trang này chỉ cung cấp thông tin tổng quát. Chứ không nhằm mục đích thay thế cho 

luật lệ và các quy chế hiện hành về chương trình được mô tả trong tài liệu này. 

Nếu quý vị còn có thắc mắc về các ngưỡng giới hạn thẩm quyền pháp lý, 

vui lòng liên lạc với chúng tôi tại số 1-800-397-6251, TTY 1-877-889-5627.

OFFICE OF FEDERAL CONTRACT

COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS

U.S. Department of Labor Tháng Giêng 2016
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of The X-Change  Corporation on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2006 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Sheriff,  President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael L. Sheriff
Michael L. Sheriff, President, Chief
Executive Officer, and Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer)


November 20, 2006


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



<PAGE>
Case 1:07-cv-03222-RPP Document 41-2 Filed 08/22/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. RAINES

No. 160 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 303.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 June 1976.
#### STATE v. BLALOCK

No. 138 PC.

Case below: 9 N.C. App. 94.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 28 August 1970.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Bairnco Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Luke E. Fichthorn III, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Luke E. Fichthorn, III_

Luke E. Fichthorn, III

Chairman &

Chief Executive Officer



#
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 23

- 00246

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 48th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 048

- 341152

- 23

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion



### O LU 

### W HITEHEAD



### , Appellant

V



### .

B ARBARA 

### K AY 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “Appellant ’ s Motion to Withdraw Premature Notice of

Appeal Without Prejudice.” We grant the motion and dismiss the a ppeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered : August 3, 2023
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS Oklahoma Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Tranbarger, O.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### SHERMAN v. MYERS

No. 136 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 29.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 June 1976. Appeal dimissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question 17 June 1976.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Recent News & Stories             
  -  News Releases             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## News Release

# USS California Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Turk, P.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Case 1:06-cv-14995-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM OCEAN
BIO-CHEM, INC. FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             433,772
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,826,572
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (22,500)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,730,321
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,275,367
<PP&E>                                           5,676,618
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,161,313)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,547,452
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,477,659
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            38,225
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,879,236
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,547,452
<SALES>                                         14,317,485
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,337,120
<CGS>                                            9,915,216
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,311,235
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 414,785
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    695,884
<INCOME-TAX>                                       264,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                431,484
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       431,484
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .11


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cr-00357-CM     Document 30      Filed 12/21/2007     Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Form 10-Q of Koss Corporation (the Company) for the
quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Koss, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ Michael J. KossMichael J. KossChief Executive Officer andChief Financial OfficerDate: November 15, 2004
 Note: This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed, except to the extent
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 20 of 20
#### STANBACK v. STANBACK

No. 116 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 174.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 31 January 1977.
Case 1:07-cr-00349-DAB Document 4 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### MOREHEAD v. HARRIS

No. 51 PC.

Case below: 4 N.C. App. 235.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 18 June 1969.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

# USS Oklahoma Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Johnson, E.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### PARK v. CARROLL

No. 85 PC.

Case below: 18 N.C. App. 53.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 12 July 1973.
Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 15 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 15 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 12 Filed 03/10/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 12 Filed 03/10/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 20-7      Filed 02/02/2005     Page 1 of 3

Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 20-7      Filed 02/02/2005     Page 2 of 3

Case 7:04-cv-08928-KMK-LMS     Document 20-7      Filed 02/02/2005     Page 3 of 3
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 25 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 25 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### TURNER v. LEA

No. 76 PC.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 113.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina' Court of Appeals denied 6 May 1975.