alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 1 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 2 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 3 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 4 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 5 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 6 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 7 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 8 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 9 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 10 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 11 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 12 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 13 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 14 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 15 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 16 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 17 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 18 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 19 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 20 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 21 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 22 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 23 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 24 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 25 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 26 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 27 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 28 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 29 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 30 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 31 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-3 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 32 of 32
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 24-10058

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Kyung Heo, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:23-CR-212-1

______________________________

Before Graves, Willett, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Kyung Heo has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Heo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 1, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 24-10058 Document: 43-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/01/2024
No. 24-10058

2

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 24-10058 Document: 43-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/01/2024
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below,hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

     (1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Kinder Morgan, Inc. and will be retained by Kinder Morgan, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

| Dated:  November 4, 2003 |  | /s/ C. Park    Shaper                                                   |  |
|------------------------------------|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|                                    |  | C. Park Shaper    Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |

----

----
#### STATE of Maine v. ROBERT M.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Submitted on Briefs March 22, 1991.

Decided April 11, 1991.

Stephanie Anderson, Dist. Atty., Diane Powers, Asst. Dist. Atty., Portland, for plaintiff.

Richard W. Elliott, II, Elliott & Elliott, Boothbay Harbor, for defendant.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and ROBERTS, WATHEN, CLIFFORD, COLLINS and BRODY, JJ.

COLLINS, Justice.

Defendant Robert M. appeals the decision of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, *Lipez, J.)*denying his appeal from convictions as an accomplice, 17-A M.R. S.A. § 57(3)(A) (1983), to criminal mischief, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 806(1)(A) (1983), and theft, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 353 (1983), following a juvenile adjudication hearing in District Court (Bath, *Westcott, J.).*The only issue presented on appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the convictions. Finding that there was, we affirm.

We review the record of the District Court directly. *State v. Flint,*544 A.2d 739, 741 (Me.1988). In reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, the judgment will stand if, based on the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom, “viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any trier of fact rationally could find beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offense charged.” *State v. Barry,*495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985).

The court found that the primary actor had committed the crimes beyond a reasonable doubt. It based this finding on eyewitness testimony of the commission of the crimes and the primary actor’s possession of the stolen property. The court found further that defendant had aided in the commission of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. It based this finding on the testimony that defendant was with the primary actor before, during and after the crime; on a reasonable inference from the testimony that defendant was the lookout; and on its disbelief of defendant’s story. *See Flint,*544 A.2d at 742; *State v. Ifill,*572 A.2d 476, 477 (Me.1990); *State v. Langill,*567 A.2d 440, 444 (Me.1989). The court’s decision was supported by facts on the record and reasonable inferences therefrom.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring:
Case 1:07-cv-03312-PAC Document 7-9 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03312-PAC Document 7-9 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                                5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the contained quarterly 10-Q and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                             1
       
<S>                                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              Jul-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                                 Aug-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                   Apr-30-1997
<CASH>                                                             742,082
<SECURITIES>                                                     2,728,583
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      254,077
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 4,542,340
<PP&E>                                                          48,707,816
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  20,435,929
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  39,693,039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            2,727,388
<BONDS>                                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      25,213,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    39,693,039
<SALES>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 7,343,860
<CGS>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 6,634,501
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 520,435
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    378,890
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       161,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                217,890
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                       217,890
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                          0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          0.00
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,036
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      286
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        208
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          10,407
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,930
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,993
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,102
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           389
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,993
<SALES>                                         17,212
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,212
<CGS>                                            4,185
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,940
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  92
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,682)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       897
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,785)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,785)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.44)


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03331-MGC     Document 5      Filed 07/09/2007     Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                5
                                                                     
                              
<LEGEND>                       THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
                               INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORT JAMES
                               CORPORATION'S SEPTEMBER 28, 1998,
                               FORM 10-Q FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
                               QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
                               SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
 <NAME>                        FORT JAMES CORPORATION
<CIK>                          0000053117
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000,000
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              Dec-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   Sep-27-1998
<CASH>                                                             20
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     967
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                       869
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                2,043
<PP&E>                                                          8,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  3,476
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  7,871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           1,517
<BONDS>                                                         3,933
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                           22
<OTHER-SE>                                                        940
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    7,871
<SALES>                                                         5,495
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                5,495
<CGS>                                                           3,751
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   3,751
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  (32)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   620
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      216
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               405
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    (3)
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      402
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    1.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    1.83
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 15 Filed 06/22/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 1 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 2 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 3 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 4 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 5 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 6 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 7 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 8 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 9 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 10 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 11 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 12 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 13 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 14 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 15 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 16 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 17 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 18 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 19 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 20 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 21 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 22 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 23 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 24 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 25 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 26 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 27 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 28 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 29 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 30 of 31
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-4 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 31 of 31
#### In re Harold W. VAN ALLEN, Petitioner.

Misc. No. 787.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: March 7, 2005.

Before LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

Harold W. Van Allen petitions for a writ of mandamus to direct the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims to accept his notice of appeal and docket his case.

Van Allen submitted a notice of appeal to the Veterans Court related to “1983, 1987, 2001, other dates of BVA ‘TBI’ decisions.” Counsel to the clerk spoke with Van Allen by telephone and wrote two letters to him asking him to identify the BVA decision or decisions that he was appealing. Counsel also noted that Van Allen had three previous appeals and that the court was aware that Van Allen had a case pending before the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board). Van Allen did not clarify his notice of appeal. He now asks us to direct the Veterans Court to docket his appeal.

The traditional use of the writ of mandamus in aid of appellate jurisdiction, *see*28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), “has been to confine an inferior court to a lawful exercise of its prescribed jurisdiction or to compel it to exercise its authority when it is its duty to *300do so.” *Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass’n,*819 U.S. 21, 26, 68 S.Ct. 938, 87 L.Ed. 1185 (1943). A party who seeks a writ bears the burden of proving that he has no other means of attaining the relief desired, *Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Southern Dist. of Iowa,*490 U.S. 296, 309, 109 S.Ct. 1814, 104 L.Ed.2d 318 (1989), and that the right to issuance of the writ is “clear and indisputable.” *Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.,*449 U.S. 33, 35, 101 S.Ct. 188, 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980).

Van Allen does not satisfy the first prong of the test. He has an alternate means of attaining the relief required, i.e., identifying the Board decision or decisions that he is seeking to appeal. Even when looking to the all the circumstances surrounding the notice of appeal, it does not identify an appealable decision. Thus mandamus is not warranted.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The petition is denied.
Exhibit 10.13

M E M O R A N D U M
​
To:Justin Moisio
​
From:George A. Mangiaracina
​
Date:October 7, 2020
​
Re:2020 Annual Salary and Bonus Target Summary
​
​
Base Salary:$360,000
​
Target Cash Bonus:$135,000
​
Target RSU Bonus
Award:Equivalent of $45,000 vesting over 3 years
​
Example:  $45,000 / $1.50 share price = 30,000 RSUs
​
Target Option Bonus
	Award:
	For every 1 RSU share awarded, 0.5 options will also be awarded with standard exercise price calculation


​
Example:  $45,000 / $1.50 share price = 30,000 RSUs
     30,000 RSUs / 2 = 15,000 options awarded vesting over 3 years
​
	Severance Terms:
	Change of Control: 12 months base salary and 12 months COBRA coverage.  Change of Control generally means an acquiring entity purchases more than 50% of the Common Stock of IMH and your position is eliminated within 12 months thereafter.


​
Termination without Cause: 6-12 months base salary at the discretion of the company and matching period for COBRA coverage.  Cause generally means a material reason to terminate your employment, such as a material violation of company policies and procedures.
​
Nothing contained herein modifies the at-will status of your employment with the company.
​
Receipt Acknowledged:
​
​
​
	​


	​



	/s/ Justin Moisio 
	Date: October 7, 2020
​

	​
	​




​
#### SAMS v. SARGENT

No. 89 PC.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 219.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 May 1975.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 217 (Thursday, November 10, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68469-68470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22485]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute Of Child Health And Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, Urban Agriculture as a Primary 
Source for Childhood Lead Exposure in Kenya.
    Date: November 28, 2005.
    Time: 12:30 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Michele C. Hindi-Alexander, Division of 
Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, National Institute 
of Child Health And Development, 1600 Executive Boulevard, R. 5B01, 
Bethesda, MD 20812-7510. (301) 435-8382. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#492120272d20282524092428202567272021672e263f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="036b6a6d676a626f6e436e626a6f2d6d6a6b2d646c75">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 68470]]


    Dated: November 1, 2005.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-22485 Filed 11-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>