alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1388 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1388

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To manage supply chain risk through counterintelligence training, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supply Chain Counterintelligence 
Training Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. COUNTERINTELLIGENCE TRAINING PROGRAM TO MANAGE SUPPLY CHAIN 
              RISK.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in 
coordination with the Director of National Intelligence, the Secretary 
of Homeland Security, and the Administrator of General Services, shall 
establish and implement a counterintelligence training program for 
officials with supply chain risk management responsibilities at 
executive agencies (including programmatic, information communications 
technology, and acquisition officials). The program shall be designed 
to prepare such personnel to identify and mitigate counterintelligence 
threats that arise during the acquisition and use throughout the 
lifecycle of information and communications technology.

SEC. 3. REPORTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF PROGRAM.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, and every 180 days for the next three years, the Director of the 
Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with the Director of 
National Intelligence, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the 
Administrator of General Services, shall submit to the appropriate 
congressional committees and leadership a report on implementation of 
the program required under section 2.

SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Appropriate congressional committees and leadership; 
        information and communications technology.--The terms 
        ``appropriate congressional committees and leadership'' and 
        ``information and communications technology'' have the meanings 
        given the terms in section 4713(k) of title 41, United States 
        Code.
            (2) Executive agency.--The term ``executive agency'' has 
        the meaning given the term in section 133 of title 41, United 
        States Code.

            Passed the Senate November 7, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1388

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To manage supply chain risk through counterintelligence training, and 
                          for other purposes.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                         23,668
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  68,271
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,131
<INVENTORY>                                    14,255
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               118,465
<PP&E>                                         471,984
<DEPRECIATION>                                 145,744
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 552,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          63,898
<BONDS>                                        205,221
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    5,792
<COMMON>                                       4,247
<OTHER-SE>                                     135,571
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   552,744
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               148,363
<CGS>                                          82,934
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  133,403
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,183
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,593
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,668
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,925
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,925
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.05



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       192,324,585
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   3,385,169
<MORTGAGE>                                  14,986,939
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  372,555
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             221,423,817
<CASH>                                       3,225,285
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             376,741
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      29,254,790
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             292,297,256
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            215,224,527
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         22,428,481
<POLICY-OTHER>                               1,879,534
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,817,036
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,447,850
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,829,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               292,297,256
<PREMIUMS>                                  22,674,887
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          7,540,310
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                            (86,133)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 201,003
<BENEFITS>                                  11,763,951
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  (872,631)
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        17,459,249
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,979,498
<INCOME-TAX>                                   554,259
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,425,239
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,425,239
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2
 
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,as adopted pursuant toSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Irwin Financial Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the "Report"), I, Gregory F. Ehlinger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 14, 2002
______/s/___________________________ 
Gregory F. Ehlinger 
Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE v. DIAL

No. 176 PC.

Case below: 46 N.C. App. 122.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 June 1980.
#### William B. MCDERMOTT; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 04-16974.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 2005.*

Decided April 4, 2005.

William B. McDermott, Phoenix, AZ, pro se.

Donna McDermott, Phoenix, AZ, pro se.

Sara A. Ketehum, Esq., Jennifer A. Giaimo, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

William B. McDermott and Donna McDermott appeal pro se the district court’s dismissal of their complaint challenging the Internal Revenue Service’s notices of determination approving collection actions with respect to their unpaid 1996 and 2001 income taxes.

The district court did not err in dismissing the McDermotts’ action pursuant to U.S. Dist. Ct. Rules D. Ariz., Rule 1.10, for failure to file an opposition to the United States’ motion to dismiss, because the district court advised the McDermotts of the consequences of failing to respond and granted them an enlargement of time to file their response. *Ghazali v. Moran,*46 F.3d 52, 53-4 (9th Cir.1995). In addition, the McDermotts waived any challenge to the district court’s determination that their action should be dismissed, because they have not addressed the district court’s determination on appeal. *Paladin Assocs., Inc. v. Montana Power Co.,*328 F.3d 1145, 1164 (9th Cir.2003).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-3 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 1 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-3 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 2 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-3 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 3 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-3 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 4 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-3 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 5 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-3 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 6 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-3 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 7 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-3 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 8 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-3 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 9 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-3 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 10 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-3 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 11 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-3 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 12 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-3 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 13 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-3 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 14 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-3 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 15 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-3 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 16 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-3 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 17 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-3 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 18 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 36-3 Filed 02/15/2008 Page 19 of 19
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly Report of Strategic Internet
  Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
  June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
  hereof (the "Report"). I, Ralph Shearing, Chief Executive Officer of the company,
  certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sction
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

|Dated: August 19, 2003 | /s/ Ralph Shearing 
|---------------------- | -------------------
|                       |                    
|                       | Ralph Shearing, CEO

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CRAIG S. SLAVIN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

REBECCA MONET; LAURENCE F. 

HAINES, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-55549 

D.C. No. 

3:19-cv-01786-JM-MDD 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Jeffrey T. Miller, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 3, 2021**

Pasadena, California

Before: KLEINFELD, TALLMAN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Craig Slavin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for 

failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). 

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 5 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

1. The district court correctly determined that Slavin failed to state a 

claim for malicious prosecution under California law because the defendants in this 

matter had probable cause to pursue their libel claim against Slavin in the prior 

proceedings. See Roberts v. McAfee, 660 F.3d 1156, 1163 (9th Cir. 2011) (noting 

that the second element of a California malicious prosecution claim is that the prior 

proceedings were brought without probable cause). “Probable cause is present 

unless any reasonable attorney would agree that the action is totally and 

completely without merit.” Roberts v. Sentry Life Ins., 90 Cal. Rptr. 2d 408, 412

(Ct. App. 1999) (citation and emphasis in original omitted). That some of the 

factual allegations in the prior libel complaint were later disproved does not vitiate 

the probable cause to continue the claim supported by the other factual allegations 

in the prior complaint. Slavin’s argument to the contrary is not supported by the

legal authority to which he cites. 

2. The district court properly determined that Slavin failed to adequately 

allege the malice element of a malicious prosecution claim against Defendant 

Haines. To state a California malicious prosecution claim, “[t]he plaintiff must 

plead and prove actual ill will or some improper ulterior motive,” ranging 

“anywhere from open hostility to indifference.” Downey Venture v. LMI Ins. Co., 

78 Cal. Rptr. 2d 142, 151 (Ct. App. 1998) (citations and emphasis in original 

omitted). Although Slavin’s complaint alleges Monet demonstrated malice by 
3 

filing the libel suit to harass Slavin and gain an unfair business advantage over 

him, it fails to specifically allege Haines’ ill will or other improper motive. 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Kenneth W. Brimmer, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of Sterion Incorporated;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  December 29, 2003

/s/  Kenneth W. Brimmer



Kenneth W. Brimmer,

Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

TheBoard of Directors

PioneerDrilling Company:

 

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8of Pioneer Drilling

Company(Reg. Nos. 333-48286 and 333-110569) and the registration statement on Form S-3(Reg. No. 333-113036) of our reports dated May 27, 2005, with respectto the consolidated balance sheets of Pioneer Drilling Company and subsidiariesas of March 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows foreach of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2005 and allrelated financial statement schedules, management’s assessment of the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2005 and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31,2005, which reports appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PioneerDrilling Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005.

 

 

SanAntonio, Texas

May 31,2005

 

----
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.033-64047, 333-157017, 333-143369, 333-118584, 333-104386 and 333-89867pertaining to the Supreme Industries, Inc. Form S-3 Registration,Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Option Plan, 2001 Stock Option Plan and 1998Stock Option Plan of our report dated March 24, 2010, on the consolidatedfinancial statements and financial statement schedule of Supreme Industries, Inc.and its subsidiaries, which report is included in Form 10-K for SupremeIndustries, Inc. for the year ended December 26, 2009.

 

 
|                | /s/ Crowe Horwath LLP |
|---------------------|-----------------------|
|                |                  |
| South Bend, Indiana |                  |
| March 24, 2010 |                  |

 

1

----
Case 1:07-cv-03312-PAC Document 7-2 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03312-PAC Document 7-2 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROBERT K. HUDNALL and SHARON E. 

HUDNALL,

Appellants,

v.

SMITH and RAMIREZ RESTORATION, 

LLC,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00260-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 6

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2021DCV4380)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We 

further order Appellant to pay all costs of this appeal and that this decision be certified below for 

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
Case 1:07-cv-03284-AKH Document 2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### ASSOCIATES, INC. v. MYERLY and EQUIPMENT CO. v. MYERLY

No. 149 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 85.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 June 1976. Appeal dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question.
22



Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-43601) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan and
Consultants Option Plan of AFP Imaging Corporation of our report dated August
10, 2004, except for the third paragraph of Note 4, as to which the date is
September 21, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of AFP Imaging Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended June 30, 2004.




GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP

New York, New York


September 24, 2004
Case 1:07-cv-03329-HB     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 1 of 1