alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VINCENT ASEERVATHAM,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-73666

Agency No. A089-245-077

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted October 16, 2012

Honolulu, Hawaii

Submission Deferred October 17, 2012

Resubmitted September 5, 2013

Before: REINHARDT, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Vincent Aseervatham petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal of the Immigration Judge’s

decision denying asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention

FILED

SEP 10 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Against Torture (“CAT”). Because the parties are familiar with the history of the

case, we need not recount it here. 

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Aseervatham

provided material support to a terrorist organization and is therefore ineligible for

asylum. 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3)(B)(iv)(VI). Aseervatham provided computer

support for the Liberation Tiger Tamil Eelam, a designated terrorist organization. 

Communications support is among the examples given in the statute of prohibited

support activities. Id. Aseervatham’s claim that the statute does not apply because

he acted under duress is foreclosed by Annachamy v. Holder, __F.3d __, 2013 WL

4405687, at *9 (9th Cir. July 3, 2012).

Aseervatham’s departure from the United States has rendered moot his

claims for withholding of removal and CAT relief. 8 CFR §§ 1241.7, 1208.16(f).1

PETITION DENIED.

1This case is hereby resubmitted for decision. Petitioner’s motion for

judicial notice is denied. See Fisher v. I.N.S., 79 F.3d 955, 963 (9th Cir. 1996). 

Respondent’s motion to exceed the word limit for the letter brief ordered by this

Court is denied as moot. See Ninth Cir. R. 32-3(1).

-2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted form the
unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 1997
and the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of earnings fo the
three months ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                 401,696
<SECURITIES>                           677,351
<RECEIVABLES>                       23,164,672
<ALLOWANCES>                           931,395
<INVENTORY>                         34,357,124
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    59,675,376
<PP&E>                               7,596,980
<DEPRECIATION>                       2,569,827
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      70,568,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               18,236,579
<BONDS>                             16,012,291
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                               397,572
<OTHER-SE>                          35,922,393
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        70,568,835
<SALES>                             36,878,534
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    36,878,534
<CGS>                               29,061,380
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       29,061,380
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     6,877,115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     272,009
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        668,030
<INCOME-TAX>                           270,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    398,030
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                           398,030
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.10
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of HEI, Inc. (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Douglas J. Nesbit, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Douglas J. Nesbit
Douglas J. Nesbit
Chief Financial Officer Date: January 13, 2005   *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to HEI, Inc. and will be retained by HEI, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
a103092021ltiprsu






« FORM OF »        2021 LTIP Award Letter   Last Name, First Name      May 11, 2021   2021 Long Term Incentive Award Letter  Dear First Name,  I am pleased to inform you that you have received a Grant of Units in the amounts set forth below. These  Units entitle you to receive Constellium Shares (or a cash equivalent, at Constellium’s discretion), subject  to the terms and conditions set forth in this Award Letter, in the Constellium 2021 Long Term Incentive  Award Agreement (the “2021 Award Agreement”) and the Constellium SE 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, as  may be amended from time to time (the “Plan”). Capitalized Terms used in this Award Letter, unless so  defined herein, shall have the meanings found in the 2021 Award Agreement or the Plan.  Grant Date May 11, 2021  Award Value $XX,XXX   Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) Y,YYY   Vesting Date May 11, 2024  Vesting Period From the Grant Date through the Vesting Date  Please note that, except as otherwise set forth in the 2021 Award Agreement, the vesting of the RSUs and  the delivery of Shares (or a cash equivalent in respect of such RSUs) is subject to the satisfaction of the  Continued Service Condition.   By electronic acceptance of this award, you acknowledge that you have received a copy of, or have online  access to, the 2021 Award Agreement and the Plan, and hereby accept the Units granted, subject to all the  terms and provisions of this Award Letter, the 2021 Award Agreement and the Plan. The Board or the  Committee shall determine whether an event has occurred resulting in the forfeiture of your Units and any  Shares issuable thereunder and all such determinations shall be final and conclusive. You also  acknowledge that this award and similar awards are made on a selective basis and are, therefore, to be  kept confidential.   Very truly yours              Ryan Jurkovic  Senior Vice President  Chief Human Resources Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 24, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 24, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19I0264. THOMAS F. CUFFIE et al. v. JOETTA ARMSTRONG, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND AS SURVIVING SPOUSE OF JOSEPH JOHNSON et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

18EV002786
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6087

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIE HORTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.

(CR-89-180-A, CA-93-439-AM)

Submitted: August 31, 1998 Decided: October 7, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Franklin West, Jr., RICHARDS, MCGETTIGAN, REILLY & WEST,

Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Debra Sue Straus, Assistant

United States Attorney, David Glenn Barger, OFFICE OF THE UNITED

STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Horton, Nos. CR-89-180-A; CA-93-439-AM

(E.D. Va. Jan. 31, 1995; Nov. 25, 1997) We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS Oklahoma Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Montgomery, C.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### STATE v. GRANT

No. 11 PC.

Case below: 18 N.C. App. 722.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals ■ denied 2 October 1973.
EXHIBIT 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



As of September 27, 2003 the Companys subsidiaries, all wholly-owned and incorporated in California (except where noted otherwise) were:



|    |  | Banner Marketing, Inc.                       
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|    |  | Certified Grocers of California, Ltd.        
|(4) |  | United Grocers, Inc.                         
|    |  | Grocers and Merchants Insurance Service, Inc.
|    |  | Grocers Capital Company                      
|    |  | Grocers Specialty Company                    
|    |  | Grocers Development Center, Inc.             
|    |  | Preferred Public Storage Company             
|    |  | Crown Grocers, Inc.                          
|    |  | Grocers General Merchandise Company          
|(1) |  | Unified International, Inc.                  
|(2) |  | Springfield Insurance Company                
|(3) |  | Sav Max Foods, Inc.                          
|(4) |  | Northwest Process, Inc.                      
|(4) |  | R&R Liquidating Corporation                  
|(4) |  | U.G. Resources, Inc.                         
|(4) |  | United Resources, Inc.                       
|(4) |  | Western Security Services, Ltd.              
|(4) |  | Western Passage Express, Ltd.                
|(5) |  | Springfield Insurance Company Limited        

---

|(1) |  | Incorporated in Delaware
|--- |  | ------------------------

|(2) |  | Outstanding capital shares are owned by Grocers and Merchants Insurance Services, Inc.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) |  | Outstanding capital shares are owned by Crown Grocers, Inc.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------

|(4) |  | Incorporated in Oregon
|--- |  | ----------------------

|(5) |  | Incorporated in Bermuda
|--- |  | -----------------------
#### FORD MARKETING CORP. v. INSURANCE CO.

No. 183 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 297.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 August 1977.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                         5

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                            0
<SECURITIES>                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                      0
<INVENTORY>                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  0
<PP&E>                            0
<DEPRECIATION>                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             0
<BONDS>                           0
<COMMON>                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0
<PREFERRED>                       0
<OTHER-SE>                        0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      0
<SALES>                           236686
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  236686
<CGS>                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  214142
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   22544
<INCOME-TAX>                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               22544
<DISCONTINUED>                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
<CHANGES>                         0
<NET-INCOME>                      22544
<EPS-BASIC>                     .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                     .00


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. WOODCOCK

No. 9 PC.

Case below: 17 N.C. App. 242.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 March 1973.
Case 1:07-cv-03303-CM-DCF Document 1 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03303-CM-DCF Document 1 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03303-CM-DCF Document 1 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03303-CM-DCF Document 1 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03303-CM-DCF Document 1 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03303-CM-DCF Document 1 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03303-CM-DCF Document 1 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03303-CM-DCF Document 1 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03303-CM-DCF Document 1 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 9 of 9
Opinion withdrawn by court order filed 5/14/02; another opinion will issue at later dateUNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-8108 JOHN MOCK, a/k/a Eric Washington, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-786-5) Submitted: March 12, 2002 Decided: May 9, 2002 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Mock, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: John Mock appeals from the district court’s order dismissing sua sponte his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001) petition as untimely. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Mock v. North Carolina , No. CA-01-786-5 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit
      10.1.2









July
      10,
      2007




Bank
      of
      America, N.A.


Agency
      Management


Attn.:
      Maria McClain


101
      N.
      Tryon Street


Mail
      Code: NC1-001-15-14 Charlotte, NC 28255




Bank
      of
      America, N.A.


Credit
      Service Rep, AVP


Attn.:
      Jacqueline Archuleta


901
      Main Street; 14th Floor


Dallas,
      Texas 75202




RE:
            Credit
                Agreement dated as of May 11, 2006, among Great Plains Energy
                Incorporated, Certain Lenders, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative
                Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent, and BNP Paribas,
                The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Limited, Chicago Branch and Wachovia
                Bank
                N.A., as Co-Documentation Agents (the "Great Plains Energy Credit
                Agreement").




Credit
      Agreement dated as of May 11, 2006, among Kansas City Power & Light Company,
      Certain Lenders, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, JPMorgan Chase
      Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent, and BNP Paribas, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi
      UFJ Limited, Chicago Branch and Wachovia Bank N.A., as Co-Documentation Agents
      (the "KCPL Credit Agreement").


Transfer
      of Unused Commitment


Ladies
      and Gentlemen:




As
      provided by Section 2.6(b)(i) of the Great Plains Energy Credit Agreement and
      the KCPL Credit Agreement, we give you notice that Great Plains Energy
      Incorporated and Kansas City Power & Light Company jointly elect to transfer
      $200 million of the unused Aggregate Commitment of the Great Plains Energy
      Credit Agreement to the KCPL Credit Agreement (the "Transfer"). The effective
      date of the Transfer is July 17, 2007. Upon the effective date of the Transfer,
      the Aggregate Commitment under the Great Plains Energy Credit Agreement will
      be
      $400 million and the Aggregate Commitment under the KCPL Credit Agreement will
      be $600 million.




All
      capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
      ascribed to them in the Great Plains Energy Credit Agreement and the KCPL Credit
      Agreement. Each of Great Plains Energy and KCPL represent and warrant that
      as of
      the date hereof the conditions contained in Sections 4.2(i) and 4.2(ii) of
      their
      respective Credit Agreement have been satisfied.




Sincerely,


Great
                  Plains Energy Incorporated/s/
                  Michael W. ClineMichael
                  W. ClineTreasurer
                  and Chief Risk OfficerKansas
                  City Power & Light Company/s/
                  Michael W. ClineMichael
                  W. Cline Treasurer




c:
            M.
                G. English
              J.
                P. Gilligan




/jpg
Exhibit
32.1








KNIGHT
INC.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906


OF
THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knight Inc. (the “Company”)
for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the
capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Knight Inc. and will be retained by Knight Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








Dated:  November
      12, 2008
            
            /s/
      Richard D. KinderRichard
      D. Kinder
              Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE v. FULLERTON

No. 298 PC

Case below: 46 NC App 837

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 September 1980. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 16 September 1980.
Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC     Document 9      Filed 12/31/2007     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC     Document 9      Filed 12/31/2007     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC     Document 9      Filed 12/31/2007     Page 3 of 3
#### BOOKER v. EVERHART

No. 141 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 1.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 14 July 1977.