alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Deparbnent of Labor Employment Standards Administration 

Office of Workers' Compensation Programs 

Division of Longshore and 

Hdrbor workers' Compensation 

Washington, O.C. 20210 

File Number: 

Notice No. 89 

NOTICE TO INSURANCE CARRIERS AND SELF-INSURED EMPLOYERS UNDER THE 

LONGSHORE AND HARBOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION ACT 

SUBJECT: Revision of Forms LS-1, LS-200, LS-201, LS-202, LS-203, 

LS-204, LS-205, LS-208, LS-210 & LS-262 

Enclosed are copies of the above recently revised forms which are 

used under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act and 

its extensions, the Defense Base Act, the Nonappropriated Fund 

Instrumentalities Act and the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act. 

These forms have been revised to comply with the new display 

requirements for collections of information required by 5 CFR 

1320.8(b}. This regulation provides, in part, that collections 

of information must display the 0MB number; indicate the reason 

for the information collection and its use; advise whether the 

response is mandatory, required to obtain a benefit or voluntary; 

and to advise that persons are not required to respond to the 

collection of information unless it displays a currently valid 

0MB control number. The reporting requirements of the forms and 

their general formats have not been changed. 

With the exception of the multi-carbon Form LS-208, these forms 

have been printed on white paper. If the LS-208 is reproduced 

electroni~ally, it may also be filed on white paper provided that 

the required number of copies are also submitted. We are unable 

at this time to accept direct electronic filings of any of the 

forms. 

Prior versions of these forms are now obsolete and should no 

longer be used. If you decide to print and stock these forms, 

the printed copies must conform in every respect to the enclosed 

originals. You may, however, purchase supplies from any of the 

following printing companies: 

Uniform Printing and Supply, Inc. 

210 s. Progress Drive East 

P.O. Box 189 

Kendallville, IN 46755 

Telephone: 1-800-382-2424 

Paragon Graphics 

8131 West 10th Street 

Indianapolis, IN 46214 

Telephone: (317) 271-7310 

\lbrldng for Americas Workforce 
You may call this Office at Area Code (202) 693-0038 if you have 

any questions concerning the use or printing of these forms. 

'!ifcL~-~ 

Acting Director, Division of 

Longshore and Harbor 

Workers' Compensation 

Enclosures
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-80364, 333-01851, 33-84064, 333-42773,
333-42767, 333-65939, 333-33804) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-43788, 33-48610,
33-53802, 33-06191, 333-27907, 333-45558, 333-45562, 333-66602) of Plains
Resources Inc. of our report dated March 13, 2002, relating to the consolidated
financial statements, which appear in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
March 20, 2002
[Cite as Mantell v. Cuyahoga Cty. Prosecutor's Office , 2023

- Ohio

- 3619.]

IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO

{¶1} In this public

- records case , a S pecial Master has issued a R e port and

Recommendat i o n (R&R)

. The Special Master recommends that judgment be entered for

R e spondent and that Requester bear the costs of this c ase. (R&R, 1 , 10 .)

{¶2} Neithe r Requester nor Resp ondent has filed timely written objectio ns to the

Rep o rt and Recommendation in accord ance with R.C. 2 743.75(F)(2)

. Pursuant to R.C.

2743.7 5 (F)(2), i f neither part y timely objects, the n this Court “ shall promptly issue a final

order adopting the report and recommendation, unless it determines th at there is a n error

of law or other defect e vide nt on the fa ce of the report and recommendation. ” Upon

inde pen dent review, the Court finds that there is n o error of law or o ther defect evident

on the face of the Re port and Recom mendation . The Court ther efore adopt s the Report

and Recommendation. GREG MANTELL

Requester

v.

CUYAHOGA COUNTY PROSECUTOR ’ S

OFFICE

Respondent Case No. 2023

- 00225PQ

Judge Lisa L. Sadler

JUDGMENT ENTRYCase No. 2023

- 00225PQ

- 2

- ENTRY

{¶3} In accorda nce wi th the Sp ecial Master ’ s recommendation s

, judgment is

entered in favor of Responden t. Court costs are assessed to Requester. The Clerk shall

serve upon all parties noti ce of this judgment and its date of ent ry upon the journal.

LIS A L. SADLER

Judge

Filed September 14 , 2023

Sent to S.C. Reporter 10 / 5 /23
COV KEV TXWV TSIS PUB DHAU KEV TXIAV TXIM CAI

COV LUS CHIV HAUJLWM 11246

TEJ YAM MUAJ & KEV PAB CUAM

Qhov Kev Pib Pab

Cov neeg

ua haujlwm pes 

tsawg leej los tau

+ Cov ntawv cog

lus ua haujlwm

tshaj $10,000

Ntawv Pab Them AAP

50

Los tshaj tus 

neeg ua haujlwm

+

Daim ntawv cog 

lus ua haujlwm 

$50,000 los

yog tshaj

KEV KHO VAJ KHO TSEV

Qhov Kev Pib Pab

Cov neeg

ua haujlwm pes 

tsawg leej los tau

+ Cov ntawv cog 

lus ua haujlwm 

tshaj $10,000

16 HOM TEEV NTXAWG

Cov neeg

ua haujlwm pes 

tsawg leej los tau

+

Cov ntawv cog 

lus ua haujlwm 

tshaj $10,000

TSHOOJ CAI 503

TEJ YAM MUAJ & KEV PAB CUAM

Qhov Kev Pib Pab

Cov neeg

ua haujlwm pes 

tsawg leej los tau

+Daim ntawv cog

lus ua haujlwm 

tshaj $15,000

Ntawv Pab Them AAP

50

Los tshaj tus 

neeg ua haujlwm

+

Daim ntawv cog 

lus ua haujlwm 

$50,000 los yog 

tshaj

KEV KHO VAJ KHO TSEV

Qhov Kev Pib Pab

Cov neeg

ua haujlwm pes 

tsawg leej los tau

+

Daim ntawv cog 

lus ua haujlwm 

tshaj $15,000

Ntawv Pab Them AAP

L

50

os tshaj tus 

neeg ua haujlwm

+

Daim ntawv cog 

lus ua haujlwm 

$50,000 los yog 

tshaj

VEVRAA

TEJ YAM MUAJ & KEV PAB CUAM

Qhov Kev Pib Pab

Cov neeg

ua haujlwm pes 

tsawg leej los tau

+

Daim ntawv cog 

lus ua haujlwm 

$150,000 los 

yog tshaj

AAP Ntawv Pab Them AAP

50

Los tshaj tus 

neeg ua haujlwm

+

Daim ntawv cog 

lus ua haujlwm 

$150,000 los 

yog tshaj

KEV KHO VAJ KHO TSEV

Qhov Kev Pib Pab

Cov neeg

ua haujlwm pes 

tsawg leej los tau

+

Daim ntawv cog 

lus ua haujlwm 

$150,000 los 

yog tshaj

Ntawv Pab Them AAP

L

50

os tshaj tus 

neeg ua haujlwm

+

Daim ntawv cog 

lus ua haujlwm 

$150,000 los 

yog tshaj

Thov ceeb toom hais tias cov kev xov lus uas yuav tsum muaj rau tshooj cai Section 503 thiab VEVRAA siv tsis tau los rau cov 

chaw haujlwm uas tau txais kev pab rau cov haujlwm muab ntawm nom tswv loj los ua. Ntxiv mus, OFCCP tau muab cov kev 

txhim kho txog tej kev ntsig txog kev yuav lag luam coj los siv rau tshooj cai Section 503 thiab VEVRAA.

Thov ceeb toom hais tias daim ntawv teev cov lus tseeb no muab ib co lus qhia tawm rau sawvdaws. Nws tsis yog los siv mus 

hloov chaw txoj cai muaj tseeb thiab cov kev cai tswj hais txog txoj kev pab cuam uas tau muab piav qhia nyob rau hauv no.

Yog tias koj muaj lus noog dabtsi ntxiv txog cov kev txwv tsis ua tshaj txoj kev txiav txim cai, thov tiv tauj peb nyob rau ntawm 

1-800-397-6251, TTY 1-877-889-5627.

OFFICE OF FEDERAL CONTRACT

COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS

U.S. Department of Labor Lub Ib Hlis Ntuj 2016
# Soldier Accounted for from Korean War (Turba, S.)

/ Published Sept. 7, 2023
WASHINGTON, 
The Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) announced today that U.S. Army Sergeant Stanley Turba, 27, of Russellton, Pennsylvania, killed during the Korean War, was accounted for June 30, 2023.

In April 1951, Turba was a member of Charlie Company, 1st Battalion, 32nd Infantry Regiment, 7th Infantry Division, Eighth U.S. Army. He went missing in action after his unit engaged in a firefight with Chinese People’s Volunteer Forces in the vicinity of the Hwachon Reservoir, near the village of Yang-gu, South Korea, on April 26. Due to the fighting, his body could not be recovered at that time, and there was never any evidence that he was a prisoner of war. The Army issued a presumptive finding of death on Feb. 23, 1954.

After the implementation of the Korean War Armistice, the Republic of Korea began efforts to account for war losses. The Ministry of National Defense Agency for Killed in Action Recovery and Identification (MAKRI) was developed to work alongside DPAA. Over the years several investigations into various locations were conducted, including the search for missing men associated with site FSC 479-F, where Turba is believed to have fallen.

Between 2013 and 2017, FSC 479-F was investigated several times, with no positive matches for Sgt. Turba. In April 2021, MAKRI returned to the site and came across remains near Hill 909. The remains were carefully exhumed and sent to a lab for testing. The following October, MAKRI turned over these remains to DPAA where they were sent to our laboratory for analysis and possible identification.

To identify Turba’s remains, scientists from DPAA used anthropological analysis and circumstantial evidence. Additionally, scientists from the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System used Y-chromosome DNA (Y-STR) analysis.

Turba’s name is recorded on the Courts of the Missing at the Punchbowl, along with the others who are still missing from the Korean War. A rosette will be placed next to his name to indicate he has been accounted for.

Turba will be buried in Columbus, Ohio, on a date to be determined.

For family and funeral information, contact the Army Casualty Office at (800) 892-2490.

To see the most up-to-date statistics on DPAA recovery efforts for those unaccounted for from the Korean War, go to the Korean War Accounting page on the DPAA website at: https://dpaa-mil.sites.crmforce.mil/dpaaFamWebKorean.

For additional information on the Defense Department’s mission to account for Americans who went missing while serving our country, visit the DPAA website at www.dpaa.mil, find us on social media at www.facebook.com/dodpaa or https://www.linkedin.com/company/defense-pow-mia-accounting-agency.

Turba’s personnel profile can be viewed at https://dpaa-mil.sites.crmforce.mil/dpaaProfile?id=a0Jt000000yPQSdEAO.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

___________________________________

)

DAVID L. CALDWELL, ) 

)

Plaintiff, ) 

)

 v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1084 (RLW) 

)

NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART, ) 

)

Defendant. ) 

___________________________________ ) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 On June 20, 2011, defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. In its June 22, 2011 

Order, the Court advised the plaintiff, among other things, of his obligation to file an opposition 

or other response to the motion. Further, that Order expressly warned the plaintiff that, if he 

failed to file his opposition by July 22, 2011, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. To 

date, the plaintiff neither has filed an opposition nor requested additional time to do so. The 

Court will treat defendant’s motion as conceded and will dismiss this action. 

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. 

DATE: July 29, 2011 ROBERT L. WILKINS 

United States District Judge 

/s/
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Thoratec Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 28, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, D.
Keith Grossman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

|                                                                                  |  |                     
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|By: /s/ D. Keith Grossman

Name: D. Keith Grossman
Title: Chief Executive Officer |  | Date: March 19, 2003

In connection with the Annual Report of Thoratec Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 28, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, M.
Wayne Boylston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

|                                                                                  |  |       |  |               
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----- |  | --------------
|By: /s/ M. Wayne Boylston

Name: M. Wayne Boylston
Title: Chief Financial Officer |  | Date: |  | March 19, 2003
#### BRYAN v. PROJECTS, INC.

No. 190 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 453.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 14 July 1976.
#### SUTTON v. DUKE

No. 13 PC.

Case below: 7 N.C. App. 100.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 3 March 1970.
#### GLOBE, INC. v. SPELLMAN

No. 166 PC.

Case below: 45 N.C. App. 618.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 June 1980.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Selwyn Realty Corporation, Appellant, for Cancellation and Discharge of a Mechanic’s Lien. Jeromel Realty and Construction Company, Respondent.

*Matter of Selwyn Realty Corpn.,*184 App. Div. 355, affirmed.

(Argued May 28, 1918;

decided June 11, 1918.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 3, 1918, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate a mechanic’s lien. The *560notice of lien was filed on December 10, 1917. On February 5, 1918, the owner, Selwyn Realty Corporation, served upon the lienor, the respondent' herein, a notice “ to commence an action to enforce the alleged hen * * * not later than Monday, March 11th, 1918,” or to show cause at Special Term on March 12, 1918, why the hen should not be vacated and canceled of record. On. March 9, 1918, the henor lodged with the sheriff of New York county summonses in an action to foreclose the hen, with instruction's that the same be. served upon the respective defendants therein named. Petitioner alleged that service had never been made. The Appellate Division held: “It is the settled law of this state that in ah actions or proceedings in a court of record the delivery of process to the sheriff of the proper county within the time limited by statute or by contract, with the intention to have the same served, is equivalent to the commencement of the action or proceeding within said time; that the lienor in the matter at bar complied with the notice requiring him to commence the action to enforce his lien, and that, therefore, the order appealed from was right and should be affirmed.”

*Melville H. Cane*for appellant.

*John Kadel*and *Herbert A. Knox*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
#### GADDY v. KEARN

No. 72 PC.

Case below: 17 N.C. App. 680.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 June 1973.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MANUEL M.M. ROSE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 390 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 9th day of January, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### Felipe LOPEZ GOMEZ; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-72019.

Agency Nos. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 4, 2005.**

Decided April 11, 2005.

Walter Rafael Pineda, Law Offices of Walter Rafael Pineda, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners.

Regional Counsel, Western Region, Laguna Niguel, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, Paul Fiorino, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*866Before KOZINSKI, HAWKINS, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM***

Felipe Lopez Gomez, his wife Maria Mercedes Lopez Venegas, and their four children, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision summarily affirming an immigration judge’s denial of their application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We have jurisdiction to review due process challenges, and review *de novo. Jimenez-Angeles v. Ashcroft,*291 F.3d 594, 599 (9th Cir.2002). We deny the petition.

Petitioners’ first contention that the BIA’s summary affirmance process violates due process is foreclosed by *Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 850-51 (9th Cir.2003).

Petitioners’ contention that the transitional rules of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (“IIRIRA”) apply to them because they applied for asylum before the effective date of the permanent rules of the IIRIRA and that it was a denial of due process to place them in removal proceedings is foreclosed by *Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft,*324 F.3d 1105, 1108 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that an alien does not have a settled expectation of being in deportation proceedings if the INS filed the charging document after April 1, 1997, and that placing an alien in removal proceedings does not violate his due process rights). *See also Jimenez-Angeles,*291 F.3d at 602 (holding that alien did not have settled expectation of being placed in deportation rather than removal proceedings).

The voluntary departure period was stayed, and that stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate. *See Salvador-Calleros v. Ashcroft,*389 F.3d 959 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
1. Express Recovery Systems, Inc. filed a motion for summary

disposition on other theories, which we do not address.

2013 UT App 43

_________________________________________________________

THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS

EXPRESS RECOVERY SERVICES, INC.,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

STAT COCHRON,

Defendant and Appellant.

Per Curiam Decision

No. 20120882‐CA

Filed February 22, 2013

Third District, West Jordan Department

The Honorable Andrew H. Stone

The Honorable Su Chon

No. 110415299

Stat Cochron, Appellant Pro Se

Edwin B. Parry, Attorney for Appellee

Before JUDGES ORME, THORNE, and ROTH.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Stat Cochron appeals the judgment entered against him on

September 11, 2012. This matter is before the court on its own

motion for summary disposition.1 This court cannot review the

issues raised because Cochron has not provided an adequate
Express Recovery Systems, Inc. v. Cochron

2. Cochron’s certification indicated that he lacked the resources to

pay for the transcripts. Accordingly, in this court’s sua sponte

motion for summary disposition the court indicated to Cochron

that if he could not afford a transcript, he could file a statement of

evidence and proceedings in compliance with rule 11(g) of the

Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure. The court further noted that if

the statement of evidence was properly filed and served,

consideration of the motion for summary disposition would be

stayed pending review of the statement by the district court.

Cochron failed to file such a statement.

20120882‐CA 2013 2 UT App 43

record on appeal. See Utah R. App. P. 11 (discussing the record

requirements on appeal).

¶2 Cochron’s docketing statement sets forth numerous issues

relating to rulings,findings offact, and conclusions oflaw made by

the district court during the course oftrial. However, Cochron filed

a certification stating that a transcript of the proceeding was not

necessary.2

¶3 When a defendant predicates error to this Court, he

has the duty and responsibility of supporting such

allegation by an adequate record.Absentthatrecord,

defendant’s assignment of error stands as aunilateral

allegation which the reviewing court has nopowerto

determine. This Court simply cannot rule on a

question which depends for its existence upon

alleged facts unsupported by the record.

State v. Wulffenstein, 657 P.2d 289, 293 (Utah 1982). All issues raised

by Cochron in his docketing statement and in his response to this

court’s motion for summary disposition involve rulings made

during the course of his trial. Cochron has failed to provide this

court with a transcript of those proceedings. Without such a

transcript, we must presume the correctness of the underlying

decisions. See State v. Mead, 2001 UT 58, ¶ 48, 27 P.3d 1115 (stating
Express Recovery Systems, Inc. v. Cochron

20120882‐CA 2013 3 UT App 43

that in the absence of an adequate record on appeal, we presume

the correctness of the disposition and cannot address the issues

raised).

¶4 Affirmed.
#### STATE v. ROBERTS

No. 137 PC.

Case below: 18 N.C. App. 388.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 August 1973. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal allowed 31 August 1973.
Case 1:06-cv-15158-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/26/2006 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of The X-Change  Corporation on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Michael  Sheriff,
President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael L. Sheriff
Michael L. Sheriff, President, Chief
Executive Officer, and Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer)


August 21, 2006


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.