alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Recent News & Stories             
  -  News Releases             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

-  FIRST 
-   
-   
- 2
- 3
- 4 (current)
- 5
- 6
-   
-   
-  LAST
#### ODOM v. ODOM

No. 358 PC

Case below: 47 NC App 486

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 September 1980.
#### Baldev SINGH, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-74178.

Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 4, 2005.**

Decided April 11, 2005.

Richard E. Oriakhi, Esq., Roman *&*Singh, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA; and Regina Byrd, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before KOZINSKI, HAWKINS, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

**The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Baldev Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reconsider its dismissal as untimely of his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider. *See Cano-Merida**889*v. INS,*311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002). We deny the petition for review.

The time limit for filing a notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.38(b) (a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 calendar days from the IJ’s oral decision or mailing of a written decision); *Da Cruz v. INS,*4 F.3d 721, 722 (9th Cir.1993). Given that Singh did not demonstrate the type of unique circumstances that could excuse the untimely filing of the notice of appeal, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. *See Hernandez-Rivera v. INS,*630 F.2d 1352, 1355 (9th Cir.1980). Singh’s due process contention therefore lacks merit.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Order filed December 13 , 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00066

- CV

____________ THOMAS RAMAGE AND ELIZABETH BURKHARDT , Appellants

V.

SUGAR BRANCH CONDOMI NIUM ASSOCIATION, RA MON L. SOLANO, GLENDA MARTI NEZ, ELIA SALINA, AN NIE BUTLER,

C.J. HERMS, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015

- 31884



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record 1 was filed February 19, 2016. Our review has determined
that relevant item s ha ve been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain the notice of expedited de novo appeal; the

1 Although designated as the Clerk’s Record, it was filed in this court as a “1 st Supplemental Clerk’s Record.”order of partial non

- suit signed J anuary 12, 2016; the notice of non

- suit without

prejudice; and the order denying motion to dismiss and attorney’s fees, signed January 5, 2016.
The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file an Original Clerk’s R ecord
on or before January 3, 2017 , co ntaining the notice of expedited de novo appeal; the order of partial non

- suit signed January 12, 2016 ; the notice of non

- suit without prejudice; and the order denying motion to dismiss and attorney’s fees, signed January 5, 2016.

If the omitted item s are not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item s are not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
69378 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 219 / Tuesday, November 15, 2005 / Notices 

Streets, 23rd and C Streets, or 22nd 

Street and Constitution Avenue. One of 

the following means of identification 

will be required for admittance: any 

U.S. driver’s license with photo, a 

passport, or any U.S. Government 

agency identification card. 

Questions concerning the briefing 

may be directed to Mr. Dennis 

Delehanty at (202) 647–4197 or via email at delehantydm@state.gov. 

Dated: October 27, 2005. 

Dennis M. Delehanty, 

Director for Postal Affairs, Department of 

State. 

[FR Doc. 05–22627 Filed 11–14–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–19–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Public Notice for the Sale of 

Aeronautical Property at Manchester 

Airport, Manchester, NH 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Request for Public Comments. 

SUMMARY: The FAA is requesting public 

comment on the City of Manchester, 

New Hampshire’s request to sell a 

portion (3.98 acres) of Airport property. 

The property is located in the area of the 

Northeast Ramp off Perimeter Road and 

is identified as Tax Map 721, Lot 17E. 

The land is currently unimproved. The 

parcel will be swapped with another 

parcel of equal value needed for Airport 

development. Upon sale, the land will 

be utilized for hangar development. A 

portion of the property (2.58 acres) was 

acquired under the Surplus Property 

Act via deed dated August 16, 1968. 

The disposition of proceeds from the 

disposal of airport property will be in 

accordance with FAA’s Policy and 

Procedures Concerning the Use of 

Airport Revenue, published in the 

Federal Register on February 16, 1999. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before December 15, 2005. 

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for 

review by appointment by contacting 

Mr. David Bush, Assistant Airport 

Director at Manchester Airport, One 

Airport Road, Manchester, New 

Hampshire 03103, Telephone 603–624–

6539 or by contacting Donna R. Witte, 

Federal Aviation Administration, 16 

New England Executive Park, 

Burlington, Massachusetts, Telephone 

781–238–7624. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Donna R. Witte at the Federal Aviation 

Administration, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, 

Massachusetts 01803, Telephone 781–

238–7624. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation 

Investment and Reform Act for the 21st 

Century (AIR 21) requires the FAA to 

provide an opportunity for public notice 

and comment to the ‘‘waiver’’ or 

‘‘modification’’ of a sponsor’s Federal 

obligation to use certain airport property 

for aeronautical purposes. 

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts on 

October 31, 2005. 

LaVerne F. Reid, 

Manager, Airports Division, New England 

Region. 

[FR Doc. 05–22577 Filed 11–14–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________ NO. 09
- 17
- 00079
- CV



### ________________ IN RE BBX OPERATING, LLC

__________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding 1st District Court of Jasper County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 35,155

__________________________________________________________________ ORDER
Relator , BBX Operating, LLC , filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for emergency relief . The relator seeks a writ compelling the H onorable Craig Mixson, Judge of the 1 st District Court of Jasper County, Texas, to vacate his orders of January 24, 2017, a nd March 1, 2017, which require BBX to make certain payments pursuant to a Rule 11 agreement. We note our jurisdiction over this matt er and the parties. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004).
The Court finds that temporary relief is nece ssary to protect its jurisdiction of
this matter . It is ORDERED that the trial court’s orders of January 24, 2017, and March 1, 2017, are STAYED until our opinion issues or until further order of this2

Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b). No bond is required of the relator as a condition to any relief herein granted. The response of the real parties in interest is due to be filed on or b efore Monday, March 27, 2017.
MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF GRANTED. ORDER ENTERED March 16, 2017.
PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
~AO 458 (Rev 10/95) Appeamnce

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF

CHARLES RICHARDS and JAY GEYWITS,

Individually and on Behalf of All Others

similarly situated, as Class Representatives,

Plaintiffs,

NEW YORK

APPEARANCE

v.

LANG INDUSTRIES, INC., WORLD

CLASS ON SITE MANAGEMENT, LLC

and LANG WASTE SERVICES CORP.,

Case Number: I 07 Civ. 3350(SAS)(DCF)

Defendants.

To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record:

Please enter our appearance as counsel in this case for

Defendants: ALL NAMED DEFENDANTS

Lang Industries, Inc.;

World Class On Site Management, LLC; and

Lang Waste Services Corp.

We certify that we are admitted to practice in this court.

I May 22, 2007

Date

sl

John S. Ho

7831

Bar Id. No.

sl

Mark Reinharz

6201

Bar Id. No.

Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC

330 Madison Avenue, 39th Floor

New York, New York 10017-5001

(646) 253-2300

Case 1:07-cv-03350-SAS Document 6 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF JILCO INDUSTRIES FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                             290
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   290
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          130,208
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       749,950
<OTHER-SE>                                   (879,868)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       290
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,500)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit No. 32.1
The X-Change Corporation
File No. 002-41703
Form 10-Q
Quarter ended March 31, 2011

                    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                       as adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                       of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 -
               Chief Executive and Acting Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The X-Change Corporation (Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (Report),  I, Haviland  Wright,  Chief
Executive and Acting Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350,  adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Dated: May 16, 2011                           By: /s/ Haviland Wright
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                                 Haviland Wright
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Acting Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to The  X-Change  Corporation  and will be  retained  by The  X-Change
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

S.T., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE,

Edison, NJ, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0596

Issued: May 2, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On March 17, 2023 appellant filed an appeal from a February 28, 2022 merit decision of 

the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 23-0596.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act.

1

 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance 

of OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the February 28, 2022 decision was August 27, 2022. As 

appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until March 17, 2023, more than 180 days after 

the February 28, 2022 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 23-0596

is untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not 

explained her failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to 

establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e).
2

within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed 

as No. 23-0596, must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-0596 is dismissed.

Issued: May 2, 2023

Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id.

at § 501.6(d).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1213

JOHN COOKE WILSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PRESIDENT, TIME, INCORPORATED; BRIAN WOLFE,

Director of Consumer Marketing Time,

Incorporated; E. MATTHEWS, Director of

Sweepstakes Time, Incorporated; W. J. MILLER,

Director of Sweepstakes Time, Incorporated;

PRESIDENT, VENTURA ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED;

PRESIDENT, SPORTS ILLUSTRATED MAGAZINE;

GUARANTEED & BONDED SWEEPSTAKES III; TIME

CUSTOMER SERVICE, INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Aiken. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-00-2293-1-13AK)

Submitted: May 21, 2002 Decided: June 11, 2002

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

John Cooke Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Rogers Ellerbee, III,

ROBINSON, MCFADDEN & MOORE, P.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Wilson raised several other claims in his original

complaint, but he failed to raise those claims on appeal.

Therefore, he has waived review of those claims. See 4th Cir. R.

34(b).

3

PER CURIAM:

John Cooke Wilson appeals the district court’s order adopting

the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge granting

Appellees’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing Wilson’s

action. On appeal, Wilson contends that the district court erred

by dismissing his claims of fraud, perjury, and conspiracy stemming

from a magazine sweepstakes promotion.* Finding no error, we

affirm.

We review an award of summary judgment de novo. Higgins v. E.

I. Dupont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir. 1988).

Summary judgment is appropriate when "the pleadings, depositions,

answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with

the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to

any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment

as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c); Anderson v. Liberty

Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-49 (1986). In determining whether

the moving party has shown that there is no genuine issue of

material fact, we assess the factual evidence and all inferences to

be drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the non-moving

party. Id. at 255; Smith v. Va. Commonwealth Univ., 84 F.3d 672,

675 (4th Cir. 1996).
4

We have reviewed Wilson’s claims and find them meritless.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Wilson v. President, Time, Inc., No. CA-00-2293-1-13AK (D.S.C.

Dec. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Siskiyou County Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Yreka, California, February 21, 2005. The meeting will include routine business, the review and  recommendation for implementation of submitted project proposals, and presentations of large project concept papers.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held February 21, 2005, from 4 p.m. until 7 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Yreka High School Library, Preece Way, Yreka, California.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Don Hall, RAC Coordinator, Klamath National Forest, (530) 841-4468 or electronically at                         *donaldhall@fs.fed.us*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Public comment opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

Dated: January 31, 2005.

Margaret J. Boland,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 05-2274  Filed 2-4-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Case 1:07-cv-03350-SAS     Document 39      Filed 08/11/2008     Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. WILHITE & RANKIN

No. 569A82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 654.

Petition by defendant Wilhite for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 3 November 1982. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of significant public interest allowed 3 November 1982.
#### BERRY v. CITY OF WILMINGTON

No. 2 PC.

Case below: 4 N.C. App. 648.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 10 July 1969.