alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 543 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 543

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the rate of the 
    tentative minimum tax for noncorporate taxpayers to 24 percent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2009

 Mr. Royce (for himself and Mr. Cantor) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the rate of the 
    tentative minimum tax for noncorporate taxpayers to 24 percent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``AMT Rate Reduction Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN RATE OF TENTATIVE MINIMUM TAX FOR NONCORPORATE 
              TAXPAYERS.

    (a) In General.--Clause (i) of section 55(b)(1)(A) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to noncorporate taxpayers) is amended to 
read as follows:
                            ``(i) In general.--In the case of a 
                        taxpayer other than a corporation, the 
                        tentative minimum tax for the taxable year is--
                                    ``(I) 24 percent of the taxable 
                                excess, reduced by
                                    ``(II) the alternative minimum tax 
                                foreign tax credit for the taxable 
                                year.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subparagraph (A) of section 55(b)(1) of 
such Code is amended by striking clause (iii).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
What can you do to create a mental health-friendly workplace?

1. Awareness

B uild awareness and a supportive culture by 

conducting mental-health training, anti-stigma 

campaigns, and informing all employees of 

available resources.

2. Accommodations

 Make it simple for employees to request and use 

3. Assistance

Adv ertise the services available to assist employees, 

such as an Employee Assistance Program (EAP), stressmanagement training, or other supports. In addition to 

increased employee productivity, the benefits of EAPs 

include reduced medical costs, turnover, and absences.

4. Access

 Ensure access to mental-health services by assessing 

Learn more at askearn.org/mentalhealth
Case 1:06-cv-14959-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 22      Filed 01/23/2008     Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report dated December 28, 2007accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Delphax Technologies Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the years ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference ofsaid report in the Registration Statements of Delphax Technologies Inc. and subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-69733 and 333-75504) and Forms S-3 (File No. 333-113081 and 333-146610). 

/*s*/ Grant Thornton LLP 

Grant Thornton LLP 

Minneapolis, Minnesota 

December 28, 2007
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION OF
THE TRUSTEE*
OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Lee Ann Anderson, Vice President and Trust
Officer of TexasBank, on behalf of TexasBank, the Trustee of the San Juan Basin
Royalty Trust (the Trust), not in its individual capacity but solely as
Trustee of the Trust, hereby certify that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies in all material respects with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (as explained in Note 3 to the Trusts financial
statements contained in the Trusts Annual Report to Unit Holders
for the year ended December 31, 2003, attached as Exhibit 13 to the
Report, in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 47, released September 16, 1982, the Trust
prepares its financial statements in a manner that differs from
generally accepted accounting principles; such presentation is
customary to other royalty trusts); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Trust. TEXASBANK, AS TRUSTEE OF THE
SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTBy:
    /s/ Lee Ann AndersonName:
    Lee Ann AndersonTitle:
    Vice President and Trust OfficerDate:
    March 15, 2004 *  The Trust has no executive officers.
<PAGE>


                                                                EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-80364, 333-01851, 33-84064, 333-42773, 333-
42767, 333-65939) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-43788, 33-48610, 33-53802, 33-06191,
333-27907, 333-45558, 333-45562) of Plains Resources Inc. of our report dated
March 29, 2000, relating to the consolidated financial statements which appear
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas

January 18, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<CIK>           0000351129
<NAME>          CDX Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>    1
<CURRENCY>      U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                               10,259
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                        37,045
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                           9,209
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     56,513
<PP&E>                                9,178
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      120,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               379,253
<BONDS>                             262,604
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             48,881
<OTHER-SE>                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        120,151
<SALES>                             318,260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    318,260
<CGS>                               169,711
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       326,877
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      6,363
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   21,863
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (14,980)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        (14,980)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (.003)




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          16,819
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  198,983
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     39,337
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               346,794
<PP&E>                                       1,750,723
<DEPRECIATION>                                 528,620
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,734,171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          471,809
<BONDS>                                        412,912
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,000
<COMMON>                                       156,717
<OTHER-SE>                                     394,250
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,734,171
<SALES>                                        847,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               847,320
<CGS>                                          643,187
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  783,483
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,174
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,899
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,669
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,230
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,230
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACOUNTING FIRM
   Registration Statement No. 33-47686 on Form S-8 dated May 5, 1992Citizens Banking Corporation Second Amended Stock Option Plan;Registration Statement No. 333-09455 on Form S-8 dated August 2, 1996Citizens Banking Corporation Amended and Restated Section 401(k) Plan;Registration Statement No. 333-86569 on Form S-8 to Form S-4 dated December 22, 1999F&M Bancorporation, Inc. Stock Option Plans;Registration Statement No. 333-40100 on Form S-8 dated June 26, 2000Citizens Banking Corporation All-Employee Stock Option Plan;Registration Statement No. 333-86326 on Form S-8 dated April 16, 2002Citizens Banking Corporation Stock Compensation Plan;Registration Statement No. 33-61197 on Form S-8 dated February 24, 2003Citizens Banking Corporation Stock Plan for Directors;Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-104472 dated June 9, 2003)pertaining to the registration of $125,000,000 of subordinated notes,
  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-2 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS Document 26-2 Filed 04/09/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. CASSELL

No. 66 PC.

Case below: 24 N.C. App. 717.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 May 1975. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 6 May 1975.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS Oklahoma Sailor Accounted For From World War II (George, G.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6532

MILTON N. WILLIAMS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Roderick Charles Young , Magistrate Judge. ( 3:15

- cv
- 00690

- RCY )

Submitted : June 20, 2017 Decided: June 23, 2017

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Milton N. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Elizabeth Baumgartner, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Milton N. Williams seek s to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on
Williams’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. ∗ The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that
reasonabl e jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on
pr ocedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed t he record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argumen t would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

∗ The parties co nsented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.02 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Cause No 01-13-00736-CV; In re Knight Refrigerated, LLC and Carroll Chapman, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus from Mensch v. Knight 

Refrigerated, LLC, Cause No. 13-CV-0470, in the 56th District Court of Galveston

County, Texas.

On August 28, 2013, relators Knight Refrigerated, LLC and Carroll Chapman filed a 

mandamus petition and a motion for emergency relief requesting a partial stay of discovery. 

The emergency motion for a temporary partial stay of discovery is GRANTED. Pending 

consideration of the mandamus petition by a full panel of this court, 

1. the trial court’s July 15, 2013 order compelling a response to Interrogatory No. 4 is 

stayed, and 

2. the trial court’s August 7, 2013 order compelling responses by St. Luke’s Physicians 

Center or Richard Sandison, M.D. to a deposition by written questions is also stayed.

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). Any party may move the court at any time to reconsider this grant of 

temporary relief. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(c). Moreover, nothing in this order shall be construed to 

prevent further proceedings in the trial court to narrow the scope of disagreement—should the 

parties wish to pursue them and should the trial court in its discretion choose to permit them—to 

include a request for in camera inspection of the medical records at issue. See TEX. R. EVID. 509; 

cf. R.K. v. Ramirez, 887 S.W.2d 836, 843 (Tex. 1994) (“when requested, the trial court must 

perform an in camera inspection of the documents produced to assure that the proper balancing of 

interests . . . occurs before production is ordered”). In the interest of judicial efficiency, all parties 

are requested to promptly inform this court of any developments which may have the effect of 

mooting the mandamus petition or limiting the scope of dispute.

Finally, the court ORDERS that the response to the mandamus petition by any real party in 

interest, if any, shall be due Wednesday, October 9, 2013.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: __/s/ Michael Massengale________________________________________

 Acting individually

Date: September 9, 2013
#### HASSELL v. WILSON

No. 25 PC.

No. 16 (Fall Term).

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 434.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 6 May 1980.
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE     Document 22      Filed 08/14/2007     Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RALPH ROGERS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 453 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of November, 2016

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
##### 



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

Following is a list of the subsidiaries of the Company:

|                                                |  |                
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------
|                                                |  | Jurisdiction of
|Name of Subsidiary                              |  | Incorporation  
|                                                |  |                
|Emulex Corporation                              |  | California     
|                                                |  |                
|Hyland Enterprise Development, Inc.             |  | California     
|                                                |  |                
|InterConnections, Inc. (inactive)               |  | California     
|                                                |  |                
|Emulex Caribe, Inc. (in process of liquidation) |  | Delaware       
|                                                |  |                
|InterConnections, Inc. (inactive)               |  | Washington     
|                                                |  |                
|Emulex Europe Limited (inactive)                |  | United Kingdom 

EXHIBIT 21
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 22, 2021 No. 04-20-00438-CV IN RE Luis and Olga ORTIZ and J.E.N., a minor child From the 63rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-099-CIV Honorable Enrique Fernandez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice - not participating

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Luz Elena Chapa, Justice Real Party In Interest’s motion for rehearing is DENIED.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of March, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court