alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

I, David D. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of Koss Corporation (the “Company”),hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:

 

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company forthe quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany.

 

 
|   | /s/  David D. Smith                                   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   | David  D. Smith                                       |
|   | Executive  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Date:  June 30, 2010                             |

 

 

Note:  This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not be deemed filed, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Company for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WEI LIN, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting 

Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 20-73093 

Agency No. A087-957-919 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 17, 2021**

Before: FERNANDEZ, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Wei Lin, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration 

judge’s decision denying his application for deferral of removal under the 

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 24 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-73093 

§ 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. GarciaMilian v. Holder, 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny the petition for 

review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of Lin’s CAT claim 

because he did not establish that it is more likely than not he would be tortured by 

or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to China. See

Zheng v. Holder, 644 F.3d 829, 835-36 (9th Cir. 2011) (claims of possible torture 

were speculative); Go v. Holder, 640 F.3d 1047, 1054 (9th Cir. 2011) (country 

reports and credible testimony were insufficient to compel conclusion that 

petitioner was more likely than not to be tortured).

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate. The motion for a stay of removal (Docket Entry No. 1) is otherwise 

denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          50,674
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  342,817<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,700
<INVENTORY>                                     89,411
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               503,920
<PP&E>                                         481,755
<DEPRECIATION>                                 307,536
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 756,347
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          273,116
<BONDS>                                         29,764
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,736
<OTHER-SE>                                     441,527
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   756,347
<SALES>                                        725,828
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,095,333
<CGS>                                          465,645
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  691,908
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               472,149<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (2,049)<F3>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,137
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (66,112)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (69,112)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (69,112)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.46)
<FN>
<F1>Accounts receivable in the Consolidated Balance Sheet is shown net of 
allowance for doubtful accounts.
<F2>Other expenses include Product development expenses, Sales and marketing
expenses, General and administrative expenses, and Nonrecurring operating
charges.
<F3>The provision for doubtful accounts is included in Other expense above.  The
Company provides its allowance for doubtful accounts on a specific
identification basis.  In 1996, significant improvement in collection prospects
on several large accounts occurred, resulting in reversal of amounts previously
provided in the allowance for doubtful accounts.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 1 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 2 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 3 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 4 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 5 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 6 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 7 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 8 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 9 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 10 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 11 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 12 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 13 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 14 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 15 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 16 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 17 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 18 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 19 of 20

Case 1:07-cv-03351-RWS     Document 1      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 20 of 20
I-I'ED S'I'ATES L)IS'l'RICT COLlR'I' 

SOU'I'I IERN DIS'I'KICT OF YOKK 

................................................................. --4-.-- ." - 

IN RE: 

i I :06-MI)- I 789 1.1 FK) 

'/'his Dor-zlmrnr Hcllrres 721 ,l li .4c!ions 

........................... .....- -, 

OKIIFR FOR ADhIISSION I'RO HAC \'ICE 

Considering thc Certificate of Ciood Standitg and all other docu~nents rcqi~irrd by Case 

Managemcnt Order h'o. 5 submitled by counscl. 1'1 IS HERtiBY ORDEttELI that: 

Applicant's N,~me: Kobert U. Brock 

Firm Name: Iiushton. Siahely, Johnston & Gim'ctt, P.A. 

Address: Yvst Ot'ficc Box 271, 

C'il~ StatdZip: Monlgornery, Al, 16 101 

Telephonc/F3~: (334) 206-1 1 OU '(3-3 4 ) 48 1-080 1 

is adrnirrcd to praclice pro hac vice as counsel for Mercl. L Co., Inc. in the abovc captioned rase 

in the Unitcd States llisrrict Court for lhe Southern District of New York. 

Uuted: ~arch(Y2008 

Kcu. York. Ncm Yoth 

.! - 

United States District .ludgc. 

Case 1:07-cv-03296-JFK Document 22 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

OFFICE OF THE CLERK 

POST OFFICE BOX 71 1 

MONTGOMERY. ALABAMA 36101-07 1 1 

DEBRA P HACKETT 

CLERK 

TELEPHONE 

13341 954.3600 

CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING 

I, DEBRA P. HACKETT Clerk of the United States Distl-ict Court, Mjddle 

District of A lahama, 

DO HEREBY CERTIFY that Robert Carmichael Brock was duly 

admitted to practice in said Court on October 1, 1984 and is in good standing as 

a member of the bar of said Cnurt. 

Dated at Montgomery, Alabama, on March 4, 2008. 

DEBRA P. HACKETT, 

CLERK 

By: , .- . 

Deputy Clerk 

Case 1:07-cv-03296-JFK Document 22 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 2 of 2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Marine Accounted For From World War II (Miller, C.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### STATE v. FULCHER

No. 149 PC.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 259.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina, Court of Appeals denied 5 March 1974.
Hardesty 

, 

Parraguirre 

,J. 

344, 348, 871 P.2d 950, 953 (1994); see also Arajakis v. State, 108 Nev. 

976, 983, 843 P.2d 800, 805 (1992) ("NRS 207.010 makes no special 

allowance for non-violent crimes or for the remoteness of convictions."). 

Blackwell also contends that the district court improperly 

adjudicated him a habitual criminal because it failed to consider the 

factors set forth in O'Neill v. State, 123 Nev. 9, 153 P.3d 38 (2007). 

However, the only factor the district court considers when adjudicating a 

defendant a habitual criminal is the existence of prior felony convictions. 

See id. at 15, 153 P.3d at 42 ("NRS 207.010 only grants a district court the 

discretion to dismiss a count of habitual criminality, not the discretion to 

adjudicate that status based on factors other than prior convictions."). 

Here, the record on appeal reveals that the district court considered 

Blackwell's six prior felony convictions, knew that habitual criminal 

adjudication was discretionary, and declined to exercise its discretion to 

dismiss the habitual criminal count. Accordingly, we conclude that the 

district court properly adjudicated Blackwell a habitual criminal. 

Having considered Blackwell's contentions and concluded that 

he is not entitled to relief, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 
EMMEffM1 011ZMcflffi 

cc: Eighth Judicial District Court Dept. 4 

Keith C. Brower 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) I947A 

3
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed December 17, 2014.

________________

No. 3D12-2808

Lower Tribunal No. 09-84934

________________ 

### Warren Lally

, Appellant,

vs.



### City of Homestead, et. al.

,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, David C. Miller

, Judge.

Schuler, Halvorson, Weisser & Zoeller, P.A., Jason D. Weisser and David

M. Kerner (West Palm Beach); Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., Andrew A. Harris

and Bard D. Rockenbach (West Palm Beach)

, for appellant.

Weiss Serota Helfman Cole Bierman & Popok, P.L., Edward G. Guedes,

Laura K. Wendell, Kelly Rains Jesson

, Michael Popok and Samuel I. Zeskind, for

appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

ON CONFESSION OF ERRORBased upon appellee’s confession of error, and in light of Masone v. City of

Aventura, 147 So. 3d 492 (Fla. 2014), we reverse the final judgment and remand to

the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

2
# Soldier Accounted for from WWII (Pitsor, R.)

/ Published Feb. 2, 2024
WASHINGTON, 
The Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) announced today that U.S. Army Pfc. Richard G. Pitsor, 18, of Ft. Bayard, New Mexico, who was captured and died as a prisoner of war during World War II, was accounted for March 20, 2023.

In late 1941, Pitsor was a member of G Company of the 200th Coast Artillery Regiment, when Japanese forces invaded the Philippine Islands in December. Intense fighting continued until the surrender of the Bataan peninsula on April 9, 1942, and of Corregidor Island on May 6, 1942.

Thousands of U.S. and Filipino service members were captured and interned at POW camps.  Pitsor was among those reported captured when U.S. forces in Bataan surrendered to the Japanese. They were subjected to the 65-mile Bataan Death March and then held at the Cabanatuan POW camp. More than 2,500 POWs perished in this camp during the war.

According to prison camp and other historical records, Pitsor died Aug. 28,1942, and was buried along with other deceased prisoners in the local Cabanatuan Camp Cemetery in Common Grave 305.

Following the war, American Graves Registration Service (AGRS) personnel exhumed those buried at the Cabanatuan cemetery and relocated the remains to a temporary U.S. military mausoleum near Manila. In 1947, the AGRS examined the remains in an attempt to identify them. Three of the sets of remains were recovered from Common Grave 305 but were declared unidentifiable. The unidentified remains were buried at the Manila American Cemetery and Memorial (MACM) as Unknowns.

In January 2019, the remains associated with Common Grave 305 were disinterred and sent to the DPAA laboratory at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, for analysis.

To identify Pitsor’s remains, scientists from DPAA used dental and anthropological analysis. Additionally, scientists from the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System used mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) analysis.

Although interred as an Unknown in MACM, Pistor’s grave was meticulously cared for over the past 70 years by the American Battle Monuments Commission (ABMC).

Pitsor will be buried in Ft. Bayard, New Mexico, on a date to be determined.

For family and funeral information, contact the Army Casualty Office at (800) 892-2490.

DPAA is grateful to the ABMC and the United States Army for their partnership in this mission.

For additional information on the Defense Department’s mission to account for Americans who went missing while serving our country, visit the DPAA website at www.dpaa.mil, find us on social media at www.facebook.com/dodpaa or https://www.linkedin.com/company/defense-pow-mia-accounting-agency.

Pitsor’s personnel profile can be viewed at https://dpaa-mil.sites.crmforce.mil/dpaaProfile?id=a0Jt0000000Llo2EAC.
Case 2:06-cv-06540-JS-WDW Document 1-2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 1-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 1 of 11Case 2:06-cv-06540-JS-WDW Document 1-2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 1-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 2 of 11Case 2:06-cv-06540-JS-WDW Document 1-2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 1-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 3 of 11Case 2:06-cv-06540-JS-WDW Document 1-2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 1-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 4 of 11Case 2:06-cv-06540-JS-WDW Document 1-2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 1-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 5 of 11Case 2:06-cv-06540-JS-WDW Document 1-2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 1-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 6 of 11Case 2:06-cv-06540-JS-WDW Document 1-2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 1-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 7 of 11Case 2:06-cv-06540-JS-WDW Document 1-2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 1-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 8 of 11Case 2:06-cv-06540-JS-WDW Document 1-2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 1-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 9 of 11Case 2:06-cv-06540-JS-WDW Document 1-2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 1-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 10 of 11Case 2:06-cv-06540-JS-WDW Document 1-2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 1-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 11 of 11
Exhibit
32.2








KNIGHT
INC.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906


OF
THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knight Inc. (the “Company”)
for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity
and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Knight Inc. and will be retained by Knight Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








Dated:  May
      13, 2009
            
            /s/
      Kimberly A. DangKimberly
      A. Dang
              Vice
      President and Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit
10.1.11





Discretionary
Bonus Agreement





This
Agreement is entered into effective as of May 5, 2009, by and between Great
Plains Energy Incorporated (the “Company”) and Terry Bassham (the
“Executive”).





WHEREAS,
the independent members of the Board of Directors of the Company on May 5, 2009,
authorized the payment of certain discretionary cash bonuses (the “Bonuses) to
the Executive; and





WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive wish to memorialize the terms and conditions of
the Bonuses.





NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, and of other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
Company and the Executive agree as follows:





1.  Payment of
Bonuses.  The Company shall pay the Executive a Bonus of
$92,500 in cash, less all applicable employment, payroll and other withholdings,
on each of February 10, 2010 and February 10, 2011.





2.  Payment Not Conditioned On
Continued Employment.  Except as set forth in this Agreement,
the Company’s obligation to pay the Bonuses is absolute, and is not conditioned
on the Executive’s continued employment with the Company.





3.  Bonuses Subject to
Reimbursement Obligations.  Executive acknowledges that awards
under the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan and Long-Term Incentive Plan (the
“Plans”) are subject to reimbursement if and to the extent the awards reflected
the achievement of financial results that were subsequently the subject of a
restatement, or the achievement of other objectives that were subsequently found
to be inaccurately measured, and a lower award would have occurred based on the
restated financial results or inaccurately measured
objectives.  Executive further acknowledges that in the event the
Executive is required to reimburse the Company for awards under the Plans, the
Company may, among other actions it may take in its discretion, reduce or
eliminate the amount of the Bonuses payable to Executive as may be required to
satisfy Executive’s reimbursement obligations.




4.  Choice of
Law.  This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the
laws of the State of Missouri. Any dispute relating to this Agreement shall be
brought in an appropriate Circuit Court of Missouri or the U.S. District Court
for the Western District of Missouri.






5.  Entire
Agreement.  This Agreement contains the entire agreement
between the Executive and Company concerning the foregoing matters and no
change, modification, or waiver of any provision hereof will be valid unless in
writing and signed by the parties to be bound.




[signature
page follows]








In
witness whereof, the Company and the Executive have signed this Agreement as of
the date first written above.





Great
      Plains Energy Incorporated
            ExecutiveBy:/s/
      Michael J. Chesser
              Michael
      J. Chesser
              Chairman
      of the Board and
              Chief
      Executive Officer
            /s/
      Terry Bassham
              Terry
      Bassham