alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JACKLYN,
INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             571
<SECURITIES>                                     1,628
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,625
<ALLOWANCES>                                        49
<INVENTORY>                                      9,028
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,966
<PP&E>                                           1,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,313
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,310
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,364
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,369
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,310
<SALES>                                         20,117
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,146
<CGS>                                           15,468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,365
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    209
<INCOME-TAX>                                        75
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                134
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       134
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21
 
 COMPANY
    

PLACE OF INCORPORATION
    

% OF VOTING STOCK OWNEDPetroleum Helicopters Angola Limitada
    
    Angola
    
    
    49
    %Energy Risk LTD
    
    Bermuda
    
    
    100
    %PHI International, LTD
    
    Cayman
    
    
    100
    %HELEX, LLC
    
    Florida
    
    
    100
    %International Helicopter Transport, Inc.
    
    Louisiana
    
    
    100
    %PHI Tech Services, Inc.
    
    Louisiana
    
    
    100
    %Air Evac Services, Inc.
    
    Louisiana
    
    
    100
    %PHI Air Medical, Inc.
    
    Louisiana
    
    
    100
    %Petroleum Helicopters International, Inc.
    
    Louisiana
    
    
    100
    %Helicopter Management, LLC
    
    Louisiana
    
    
    100
    %Helicopter Leasing, LLC
    
    Louisiana
    
    
    100
    %Gulf Aero Industries, LLC
    
    Louisiana
    
    
    100
    %Sky Leasing, LLC
    
    Montana
    
    
    100
    %Vertilease, LLC
    
    Montana
    
    
    100
    %Leasing Source, LLC
    
    Montana
    
    
    100
    %
Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 35-3      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 1 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 35-3      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 2 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 35-3      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 3 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 35-3      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 4 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 35-3      Filed 09/14/2007     Page 5 of 5
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 15, 2019

No. 04-19-00534-CV

EP ENERGY COMPANY,

Appellant

v.

STOREY MINERALS, LTD, Maltsberger/Storey Ranch, LLC, and Rene Barrientos, Ltd.,

Appellees

From the 81st Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-05-00083-CVL

The Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

EP Energy Corporation has filed a notice stating that it is in bankruptcy. The notice 

complies with Rule 8 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Accordingly, this appeal and 

all time periods are stayed from the date the bankruptcy petition was filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

8.2. 

It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal is ABATED. For administrative purposes, the 

appeal will be treated as a closed case, unless and until it is reinstated in accordance with Rule 

8.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of October, 2019.

___________________________________

LUZ ESTRADA,

Chief Deputy Clerk
Opinion filed August 3, 2017

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-17-00202-CR

__________

IN RE EDWARD FERNANDEZ MEDRANO

Original Mandamus Proceeding

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator, Edward Fernandez Medrano, has filed a pro se petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. He requests that we require Ross Bush, the district clerk of 

Midland County, to perform ministerial duties related to Article 11.07, section 3(c) 

of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, 

§ 3(c) (West 2015). Relator asserts that Bush has failed to transmit a copy of certain 

documents as required. We dismiss Relator’s petition for want of jurisdiction.

A court of appeals has no general writ power over a person other than a judge 

of a district or county court unless issuance of the writ is necessary to enforce the 

court’s jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (West 2004). A court of 

appeals has no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless 
2

necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the court of appeals. In re Washington, 7 

S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding). Relator 

has not shown that a writ of mandamus directed to the district clerk is necessary to 

enforce our jurisdiction. Therefore, we do not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of 

mandamus against the district clerk.

Additionally, Relator references the clerk’s duties to transmit copies of 

various documents to the Court of Criminal Appeals pursuant to Article 11.07, 

section 3(c). We have no jurisdiction to grant the relief requested by Relator with 

respect to a pending Article 11.07 writ. See Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Texas, 

Fifth Dist., 392 S.W.3d 115, 117–18 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (indicating that the 

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction when an Article 11.07 

application is pending). We have no authority to issue writs of mandamus in 

criminal law matters pertaining to proceedings under Article 11.07. In re McAfee, 

53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding).

Should an applicant find it necessary to complain about the processing of an 

Article 11.07 application for writ of habeas corpus, the applicant may seek 

mandamus relief from the Court of Criminal Appeals. See Benson v. District Clerk, 

331 S.W.3d 431 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). 

Relator’s petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

August 3, 2017

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
Case 1:07-cv-03294-JFK     Document 1      Filed 04/25/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03294-JFK     Document 1      Filed 04/25/2007     Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7699

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BARRY MCCORMICK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CR-94-39-H, CA-96-632-5-H)

Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: July 31, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry McCormick, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Charles Johnson, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We note that the record reveals no error of constitutional magnitude with regard to Appellant's counsel's decision not to argue that Appellant was entitled

to be sentenced for distribution of powdered cocaine as opposed to

crack cocaine. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT		ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE

Charles R. Deible 				Robert M. Green

Hammond, Indiana				TIMOTHY M. SWAN & ASSOCIATES

						Merrillville, Indiana

						Richard M. Davis	

						Kevin G. Kerr     				

						HOEPPNER, WAGNER & EVANS

						Valparaiso, Indiana

________________________________________________________________________

	IN THE

	SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA

________________________________________________________________________

KATHLEEN DEIBLE,                     

	Appellant (Plaintiff below), 

		v.

STEVEN POOLE,

	Appellee (Defendant below).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Supreme Court Cause No.

45S003-9812-CV-762       

Court of Appeals Cause No.

45A03-9706-CV-211

________________________________________________________________________

APPEAL FROM THE LAKE SUPERIOR COURT

The Honorable Jeffery J. Dywan, Judge

Cause No. 45D01-8904-CT-383

________________________________________________________________________

	ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

________________________________________________________________________

	December 10, 1998

PER CURIAM.

	This matter comes before the Court on Appellee's petition to transfer from Deible v. Poole, 691 N.E.2d 1313 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998).  Pursuant to Indiana Rule of Appellate Procedure 11(B)(3), we grant transfer and expressly adopt the majority opinion of the Court

of Appeals.  The case is remanded to the trial court in accord with that opinion.  

	Shepard, C.J., and Dickson, Sullivan, Selby adnand , Boehm, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
Seagull Energy Corporation:

         We  consent  to  the   incorporation  by  reference  in  the  following
Registration  Statements  of Seagull  Energy  Corporation  of our  report  dated
January 27, 1997, relating to the consolidated  balance sheets of Seagull Energy
Corporation  and  Subsidiaries  as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the related
consolidated  statements  of earnings,  shareholders'  equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, which report
appears or is  incorporated  by reference in the December 31, 1996 Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Seagull  Energy  Corporation.  Such  report on the  consolidated
financial  statements  refers to a change in the Company's  method of accounting
for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed
of.

             a.   Form S-8, Seagull Thrift Plan (2-72014).
             b.   Form S-8, Seagull Energy Corporation  1981  Non-Qualified  and
                  Incentive  Stock Option Plan (2-80834).
             c.   Form S-8, ENSTAR Natural Gas Company Thrift Plan (33-14463).
             d.   Forms S-8  and S-3,  Seagull  Energy  Corporation  1983  Stock
                  Option Plan (2-93087).
             e.   Forms  S-8  and S-3, Seagull  Energy  Corporation  1986  Stock
                  Option Plan (33-22475).
             f.   Form S-8, Seagull  Energy  Corporation  1990 Stock Option Plan
                  (33-43483).
             g.   Form S-8, Seagull Energy  Corporation  1993  Stock Option Plan
                  (33-50643).
             h.   Form S-8,   Seagull   Energy   Corporation   1993  Nonemployee
                  Directors'  Stock Option Plan 
                  (33-50645).
             i.   Form S-3,  $350,000,000  Debt  Securities  of  Seagull  Energy
                  Corporation (33-65118).
             j.   Form S-3,  ENSTAR  Alaska  Group of  Common  Stock  of Seagull
                  Energy Corporation (33-53729).
             k.   Form  S-8, Seagull Energy  Corporation 1995 Omnibus Stock Plan
                  (33-64041).
             l.   Form S-3,  $300,000,000  Debt  Securities,   Preferred  Stock,
                  Depositary  Shares,  Common  Stock  or  Securities Warrants of
                  Seagull Energy Corporation (33-64051).
             m.   Form S-8,  Global  Natural  Resources InC.  1989 Key Employees
                  Stock Option Plan and 1992 Stock Option Plan (333-13393).


Houston, Texas
March 27, 1997
#### STATE v. CRAWFORD AND MOSES

No. 157 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 421.

Petition by defendant Crawford for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 June 1976.
# United States Court of App eals F orth eSeve nt h Ci r c uit Chicago, Illin ois 60604 A ugust 7, 20 09 B efo re R IC H A R D D . C U D A H Y , Cir cu i tJudg e D A N IE L A . M A N IO N , Cir cu i tJudg e A N N C L A IR E W IL L IA M S, Cir cu i tJudg e N o. 0 8- 2354 JA Y ST A R K W E A T H E R, P et it ioner-App el lant, v. J UDY P. S M I TH, WA RD EN R espo nd ent-A pp ellee
. A pp ealfro m the U ni ted S tat es Dist ri ct Court f orthe Easter n Dis tr i ct o f W i sc o ns i n. N o. 07C 513 W i l l i am C. Gr i esba ch, J udg e . O R D E R The appell ant’ s peti ti on f orr ehear i ng i s D ENI ED . I t i s o r der ed th atthe f o l l o wi ng cor re cti ons be m ade i n the opi ni on o fthe cour t date d Jul y 2 3, 20 09: Sl i p opi ni on page 2: the l astse ntence ofthe seco nd fullpara gr aph i s a m ended to re ad “... fro m th e d ire c tio n of D em er y’s tra iler.” S l i p o p i n i o n p a g e s 1 1
- 1 2 : th e p a r a g r a p h s t a r i n go n p a g e 1 1 a n d b e g i n n i n g“ An a ddi t i o na l wo r d ab o utp r ej ud i c e . . . ” , t o g e t he r wi t h t he a pp e nd e d f o o t no t e 3 , i s o mi t t e d.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

                    The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) announces the persons who will serve on the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's Performance Review Board. This action is being taken in accordance with Title 5, U.S.C., Section 4314(c)(4), which requires that members of performance review boards be appointed in a manner to ensure consistency, stability, and objectivity in performance appraisals, and requires that notice of the appointment of an individual to serve as a member be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

The following persons will serve on the SAMHSA Performance Review Board, which oversees the evaluation of performance appraisals of SAMHSA's Senior Executive Service (SES) members:

Andrew C. Knapp, Chairperson,

Eric Broderick,

Curt Coy,

Daryl W. Kade.

For further information about the SAMHSA Performance Review Board, contact the Division of Management Systems, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Room 3-1017, Rockville, Maryland 20857, telephone (240) 276-1124 (not a toll-free number).

Dated: November 8, 2005.

Charles G. Curier,

Administrator, SAMHSA.

[FR Doc. 05-22538 Filed 11-10-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM FORT JAMES CORPORATION'S MARCH 29, 1998, FORM 10-Q
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000053117
<NAME> FORT JAMES CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                              59
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      762
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        812
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,810
<PP&E>                                           7,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,005
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,400
<BONDS>                                          4,290
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        738
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                          90
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,943
<SALES>                                          1,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,818
<CGS>                                            1,278
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,278
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  96
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    162
<INCOME-TAX>                                        65
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 97
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     (1)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        96
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43
        

</TABLE>
# L_2008108DE.01003301.xml

| 18.4.2008 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 108/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2008

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 108/33

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1577/2007 der Kommission vom 27. Dezember 2007 mit Durchführungsvorschriften zur Anwendung der Einfuhrzollkontingente für Baby-Beef-Erzeugnisse mit Ursprung in Kroatien, Bosnien und Herzegowina, der ehemaligen jugoslawischen Republik Mazedonien, Montenegro, Serbien und dem Kosovo im Jahr 2008

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 344 vom 28. Dezember 2007
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 344 vom 28. Dezember 2007

Seite 2, Artikel 1 Absatz 1 Buchstabe d:

anstatt:

| „d) | 9 175 Tonnen Baby-Beef, ausgedrückt in Schlachtgewicht, mit Ursprung in Serbien, Montenegro und dem Kosovo,“ |
| --- | --- |

„d)

9 175 Tonnen Baby-Beef, ausgedrückt in Schlachtgewicht, mit Ursprung in Serbien, Montenegro und dem Kosovo,“

muss es heißen:

| „d) | 9 175 Tonnen Baby-Beef, ausgedrückt in Schlachtgewicht, mit Ursprung in Serbien und dem Kosovo,“. |
| --- | --- |

„d)

9 175 Tonnen Baby-Beef, ausgedrückt in Schlachtgewicht, mit Ursprung in Serbien und dem Kosovo,“.

---
Exhibit
      32.2





**Certification
      of CEO and CFO Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kansas City
      Power & Light Company (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended
      June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the "Report"), William H. Downey, as President and Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, and Terry Bassham, as Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
      of
      his knowledge:





(1)       The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                William H. DowneyName:
              Title:
            William
                H. Downey
              President
                and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
            August
                3, 2007/s/
                Terry BasshamName:
              Title:
            Terry
                Bassham
              Chief
                Financial OfficerDate:
            August
                3, 2007





This
      certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      and
      is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
      document.  This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes
      of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to
      liability under that section.  This certification shall not be deemed
      to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of
      1933
      or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 except to the extent this Exhibit 32.2
      is
      expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such
      filing.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Kansas City Power & Light Company
      and will be retained by Kansas City Power & Light Company and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

FERNANDO FLORES, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 171 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 28th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.