62094 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 208 / Friday, October 28, 2005 / Notices 

Association (‘‘C.D.A.’’) 200 Series or the 

Unified Numbering System (‘‘U.N.S.’’) 

C2000. This order does not cover 

products with chemical compositions 

that are defined by anything other than 

either the C.D.A. or U.N.S. series. In 

physical dimensions, the product 

covered by this order has a solid 

rectangular cross section over 0.0006 

inches (0.15 millimeters) through 0.1888 

inches (4.8 millimeters) in finished 

thickness or gauge, regardless of width. 

Coiled, wound–on-reels (traverse 

wound), and cut–to-length products are 

included. The merchandise is currently 

classified under Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States 

(‘‘HTSUS’’) item numbers 7409.21.00 

and 7409.29.00. The HTSUS numbers 

are provided for convenience and 

customs purposes. The written 

description of the scope of this order 

remains dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this sunset review 

are addressed in the ‘‘Issues and 

Decision Memorandum for the Sunset 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 

on Brass Sheet and Strip from Germany; 

Preliminary Results,’’ from Gary 

Taverman, Acting Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Import Administration, to 

Joseph A. Spetrini, Acting Assistant 

Secretary for Import Administration, 

dated October 18, 2005 (‘‘Decision 

Memo’’), which is hereby adopted by 

this notice. The issues discussed in the 

Decision Memo include the likelihood 

of continuation or recurrence of 

dumping and the magnitude of the 

margin likely to prevail if the 

antidumping duty order were revoked. 

Parties can find a complete discussion 

of all issues raised in this sunset review 

and the corresponding 

recommendations in this public memo, 

which is on file in room B–099 of the 

main Department Building. In addition, 

a complete version of the Decision 

Memo can be accessed directly on the 

Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn, under 

the heading ‘‘October 2005.’’ The paper 

copy and electronic version of the 

Decision Memo are identical in content. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

The Department preliminarily 

determines that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on brass sheet 

and strip from Germany is likely to lead 

to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping at the following weighted–

average margins: 

Manufacturers/Producers/Exporters Weighted–Average 

Margin (Percent) 

Wieland–Werke AG ...... 3.81 

Manufacturers/Producers/Exporters Weighted–Average 

Margin (Percent) 

All Others ...................... 7.30 

Any interested party may request a 

hearing within 30 days of publication of 

this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.310(c). Interested parties may 

submit case briefs no later than 30 days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(1)(i). Rebuttal briefs, which 

must be limited to issues raised in the 

case briefs, may be filed no later than 5 

days after the case briefs, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1). Any hearing, 

if requested, will be held two days after 

rebuttal briefs are due, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.310(d)(1). The 

Department will issue a notice of final 

results of this sunset review, which will 

include the results of its analysis of 

issues raised in any such briefs, no later 

than February 27, 2006. 

This five-year (‘‘sunset’’) review and 

notice are in accordance with sections 

751(c), 752,and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: October 17, 2005. 

Joseph A. Spetrini, 

Acting Assistant Secretaryfor Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E5–5987 Filed 10–27–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–533–809 

Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges 

from India; Final Results of New 

Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On August 3, 2005, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of new shipper review of certain 

forged stainless steel flanges from India. 

The review covers one manufacturer/ 

exporter, Hilton Forge (Hilton). 

Although interested parties had an 

opportunity to comment on our 

preliminary results, we received no 

comments. The Department has not 

made any changes in its analysis 

following publication of the preliminary 

results. Therefore, the final results of 

review are unchanged from those 

presented in the preliminary results of 

review. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 28, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred 

Baker or Robert James, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–2924 and (202) 

482–0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 3, 2005, the Department 

published its preliminary results of new 

shipper review of certain forged 

stainless steel flanges from India. See 

Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges 

from India; Preliminary Results of New 

Shipper Review, 70 FR 44560 (August 3, 

2005). No party submitted comments on 

the preliminary results. 

Period of Review 

The period of review (POR) is 

February 1, 2004, through July 31, 2004. 

Scope of the Review 

The products covered by this order 

are certain forged stainless steel flanges, 

both finished and not finished, 

generally manufactured to specification 

ASTM A–182, and made in alloys such 

as 304, 304L, 316, and 316L. The scope 

includes five general types of flanges. 

They are weld–neck, used for butt–weld 

line connection; threaded, used for 

threaded line connections; slip–on and 

lap joint, used with stub–ends/butt–

weld line connections; socket weld, 

used to fit pipe into a machined 

recession; and blind, used to seal off a 

line. The sizes of the flanges within the 

scope range generally from one to six 

inches; however, all sizes of the above–

described merchandise are included in 

the scope. Specifically excluded from 

the scope of this order are cast stainless 

steel flanges. Cast stainless steel flanges 

generally are manufactured to 

specification ASTM A–351. The flanges 

subject to this order are currently 

classifiable under subheadings 

7307.21.1000 and 7307.21.5000 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS). 

Although the HTS subheading is 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise under review is dispositive 

of whether or not the merchandise is 

covered by the scope of the order. 

Final Results of Review 

We determine that a margin of 0.89 

percent exists for Hilton for the period 

February 1, 2004, through July 31, 

2004. 

Assessment 

The Department will determine, and 

the U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 208 / Friday, October 28, 2005 / Notices 62095 

on all appropriate entries, pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.212(b). We have calculated 

importer–specific duty assessment rates 

on the basis of the ratio of the total 

amount of antidumping duties 

calculated for the examined sales to the 

total entered value of the examined 

sales for each importer. We will direct 

CBP to assess the resulting assessment 

rates against the entered customs values 

for the subject merchandise on each of 

the importer’s entries during the review 

period. The Department will issue 

appropriate assessment instructions 

directly to the CBP within 15 days of 

publication of these final results of 

review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Bonding is no longer permitted to 

fulfill security requirements for 

shipments from Hilton of stainless steel 

flanges from India entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of these final results of new shipper 

review. The following cash–deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

new shipper review for all shipments of 

subject merchandise entered or 

withdrawn from warehouse for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date as provided for by section 751(a)(1) 

and 751 (a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act): 

• for subject merchandise manufactured 

and exported by Hilton the cash deposit 

rate shall be 0.89 percent; 

• for subject merchandise exported by 

Hilton but not manufactured by Hilton 

the cash–deposit rate will continue to be 

the ‘‘all others’’ rate or the rate 

applicable to the manufacturer, if so 

established; 

• the cash deposit rate for exporters who 

received a rate in a prior segment of the 

proceeding will continue to be the rate 

assigned in that segment of the 

proceeding; 

• if the exporter is not a firm covered 

in this review or in any previous 

segment of this proceeding, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be that established for the 

manufacturer in the most recent 

segment of these proceedings in which 

that manufacturer participated; 

• if neither the exporter nor the 

manufacturer is a firm covered in this 

review or in any previous segment of 

this proceeding, the cash deposit rate 

will be 162.14 percent, the all others 

rate established in the less–than-fair–

value investigation. (See Amended Final 

Determination and Antidumping Duty 

Order; Certain Forged Stainless Steel 

Flanges from India, 59 FR 5994 

(February 9, 1994)). 

These deposit requirements shall 

remain in effect until publication of the 

final results of the next administrative 

review. 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR § 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this review period. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Secretary’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR § 351.305. Timely written 

notification of return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 

violation. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

new shipper review and notice in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(2)(B) 

and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: October 21, 2005. 

Joseph A. Spetrini, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 05–21580 Filed 10–27–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–803] 

Heavy Forged Hand Tools, Finished or 

Unfinished, With or Without Handles, 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Extension of Time Limit for the 

Preliminary Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) is extending the 

time limit for the preliminary results of 

the review of Heavy Forged Hand Tools, 

Finished or Unfinished, With or 

Without Handles (‘‘HFHTs’’) from the 

People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). 

This review covers the period February 

1, 2004 through January 31, 2005. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 28, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Hallie Noel Zink, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 9, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–3208. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Statutory Time Limits 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

requires the Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) to make a 

preliminary determination within 245 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month of an order for which a review 

is requested and a final determination 

within 120 days after the date on which 

the preliminary determination is 

published. However, if it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within these time periods, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend the time limit for 

the preliminary determination to a 

maximum of 365 days after the last day 

of the anniversary month. 

Background 

On March 23, 2005, the Department 

published a notice of initiation of a 

review of HFHTs from the PRC covering 

the period February 1, 2004 through 

January 31, 2005. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Requests 

for Revocation in Part, 70 FR 14643 

(March 23, 2005). 

Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary 

Results 

The Department determines that 

completion of the preliminary results of 

this review within the 245-day period is 

not practicable. This review covers four 

companies, and to conduct the sales and 

factor analyses for each requires the 

Department to gather and analyze a 

significant amount of information 

pertaining to each company’s sales 

practices, manufacturing methods and 

corporate relationships. The Department 

also requires additional time in order to 

analyze complicated potential affiliation 

issues between some of the companies 

participating in this review. 

Therefore, given the number and 

complexity of issues in this case, and in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act, we are extending the time 

period for issuing the preliminary 

results of review by 120 days until 

February 28, 2006. The final results 

continue to be due 120 days after the 

publication of the preliminary results.