alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
YOU MUST BE 18
TO OPERATE OR CLEAN
THIS EQUIPMENT
Case 1:06-cv-14948-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14948-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14948-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14948-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14948-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14948-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14948-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14948-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14948-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14948-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14948-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14948-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14948-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14951-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.2.4


                            NEGATIVE PLEDGE AGREEMENT

                                 April 30, 1998


Greyrock Business Credit
10880 Wilshire Blvd.  Suite 950
Los Angeles, CA  90024

Gentlemen:

        Reference is made to the Loan and Security Agreement between you ("GBC")
and us and certain of our affiliates dated of even date (the "Loan Agreement")
and the documents and instruments relating thereto (with the Loan Agreement,
collectively, the "Loan Documents"). (Capitalized terms used in this Letter
Agreement, which are not defined, shall have the meanings set forth in the Loan
Agreement.)

        This will confirm our agreement that we shall not permit our subsidiary,
Cerplex SAS, a French "societe anonyme simplifiee" organized under the laws of
France (the "French Subsidiary"), to encumber or grant security interests in any
of its assets of any kind or to permit any of its assets to be subject to any
liens or charges, except for "Permitted Liens" (as defined in the Loan
Agreement). Without limiting the foregoing, within 30 days after the date
hereof, we shall cause the general assembly of shareholders of the French
Subsidiary to adopt appropriate resolutions or take other corporate action to
require that any encumbrance, grant of a security interest, lien or charge on
any of its assets (other than Permitted) will require the unanimous consent of
the shareholders, in order to implement this Agreement (but this Agreement shall
be fully effective notwithstanding any failure to adopt such resolutions), and
we shall provide you with written evidence of the same within said 30-day
period.

        This Negative Pledge Agreement and the other Loan Documents set forth in
full all of the representations and agreements of the parties with respect to
the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior discussions, representations,
agreements and understandings between the parties. This Letter Agreement may not
be modified or amended, nor may any rights hereunder be waived, except in a
writing signed by the parties hereto. Upon termination of the Loan Agreement and
payment in full of all of the Obligations, this Negative Pledge Agreement shall
terminate and be of no further force or effect.

                               Sincerely yours,

                               Cerplex, Inc. (formerly The Cerplex Group, Inc.),
                               a Delaware corporation


                               By_____________________________________
                               Title__________________________________


Accepted and agreed:

Greyrock Business Credit, a Division of
NationsCredit Commercial Corporation



By____________________________________
Title_________________________________
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4938

_____________________________

JOHN GAY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Edward P. Nickinson, III, Judge.

April 6, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, KELSEY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

John Gay, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
**EXHIBIT
      23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
      FIRM**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (No. 333-140468, No. 333-131848, No. 333-123606, No. 333-112483, No.
      333-83014, No. 333-95615, No. 333-17725, No. 333-05125, No. 33-69782, No.
      33-44481, No. 33-33535, No. 333-52844, No. 333-69955, No. 333-07347, and No.
      333-55816) of MICROS Systems, Inc. of our report dated August 29, 2007 relating
      to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness
      of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form
      10-K.





/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers
                LLPBaltimore,
                MarylandAugust
                29, 2007
UNL'I'LL) S'l'A'l'LS IIISTRICT COUK'I' 

SOUTHERN DISTRIC'S 01: NEW YORK 

IN RE: 

i hl:ZSTER FILE 

FOSAMAX PKOLl1!C'TS LIABILITY L,lTIGA'I'lON 

1 106-M 11- 1 789 (JFK) 

'177i.~ Llocuntent Keicrles To All Ac1ion.c 

ORDER FOR .4DhIISSION PRO HAG VICE 

Considering the Cerlijicate 01' Good Standing and ol l othcr docut~~cnts rcquired by Case 

Management Order No. 5 submitted by counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

..ll-'pl icant's Name: Kathlccn Sullivan Hardway UC-' r;srz,L *--I--- ---- 

Firm N;~mt.: Venable LLP 

Address: -1'tvo I Iopkins Plaza. Suite 1 800 

1 

CityIStatclZip: Haltimore. Maryland 2 1201 . w ,--- -- , ) 

3 -/y-u3 f 

_--..--....-- ii L-.- - .' "---"--urn"- 

-- .AIWI 

.I TelephoneTax: (4 1 0) 244-7400/(4 10) 244-7742 

Email Address: k shard~~-ay51::ve11able.com 

is acimilted to practice pro har \ icc as counsel lbr hIt.1-c.k & Co.. Iric. in the ahoi r. c:iptioned case 

in the I!nited Statcs I)isrric~ C'our~ fill- the Southern District of New York. 

New Yorli. Neu 1'~lrk 

d' 

r - 

(/ Il'nited States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03295-JFK Document 21 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Good 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DISTRICT OF MARYLAND 

I, Felicia C. Cannon, Clerk of the United States District Court for the District 

of hlaryland, 

DO HEREBY CERTIFY that, KATHLEEY F. SCLLI17AN, 

ESQUIRE, BAR NUMBER 25406, was duly admitted to practice in the 

United States District Court for the District of Mar?land on September I I, 1998, 

and is currently in good standing as a member of the bar of this Court. 

Dated at Baltimore, Maryland FEI,ICIA C. CANNOY 

Clerk 

Tina Stavrou - Deputy Clerk 

Case 1:07-cv-03295-JFK Document 21 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.2.a



Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kansas City Power & Light Company (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Bernard J. Beaudoin, as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Andrea F. Bielsker, as Senior Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (Section symbol) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (Section symbol) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/Bernard J. Beaudoin                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Bernard J. Beaudoin
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer           
|Date:  November 13, 2002                                                        
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|/s/Andrea F. Bielsker                                                           
|Andrea F. Bielsker                                                              
|Senior Vice President - Finance, 
    Chief Financial Officer and 
    Treasurer
|Date:  November 13, 2002                                                        
|                                                                                

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to (Section symbol) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of (Section symbol) 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT

                                       OF

                             THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

                                       OF

                             GLOBAL GOLD CORPORATION

      The undersigned, being all of the directors of GLOBAL GOLD CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation, (the "Corporation"), hereby consent, pursuant to Section
141(f) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, to the adoption of the following
resolutions in lieu of meeting:

            RESOLVED, that the issuance of a certificate to Drury J. Gallagher
      for 1,000,000 shares of the Corporation's common stock in consideration of
      the cancellation by Mr. Gallagher of the debt owed to him by the
      Corporation of $100,000 representing the compensation due him for the
      period from July 1, 1995 through June 30, 1996 and cancellation of all of
      his outstanding stock options and stock appreciation rights granted to him
      by the Corporation (other than the warrants acquired by him pursuant to
      the offer made by the Corporation under the Confidential Private Placement
      Memorandum dated May 17, 1995, as amended), be, and it is hereby,
      approved, ratified and confirmed; and be it further

            RESOLVED, that the issuance of a certificate to Robert A. Garrison
      for 1,000,000 shares of the Corporation's common stock in consideration of
      the cancellation by Mr. Garrison of the debt owed to him by the
      Corporation of $100,000 representing the compensation due him for the
      period from July 1, 1995 through June 30, 1996 and cancellation of all of
      his outstanding stock option and stock appreciation rights granted to him
      by the Corporation be, and it is hereby, approved, ratified and confirmed;
      and be it further

            RESOLVED, that the appropriate officers of the Corporation be, and
      they hereby are, authorized and directed to take any and all action and to
      execute and deliver any and all instruments required in connection with
      the transactions contemplated by the foregoing resolutions.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this instrument,
effective as of the 3rd day of January, 1997.


                                                  /s/ Drury J. Gallagher
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                      Drury J. Gallagher


                                                  /s/ Robert A. Garrison
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                      Robert A. Garrison
#### OIL CO. v. OIL AND REFINING CO.

No. 82 PC.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 82.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina 'Court of Appeals denied 6 May 1975.
EXHIBIT 32.1





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First M&F Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hugh S. Potts, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:





A.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





B.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
March 15, 2011





/s/ Hugh S. Potts, Jr.Hugh S. Potts, Jr.Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (4.78 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40381

Conference Calendar

 

ERIC R. HINKLE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES N. PARSONS, Presiding Judge - 349th Judicial

District Court; TOM B. RAMEY, JR., Chief Justice -

12th Court of Appeals; ROBY HADDEN, Justice - 12th 

Court of Appeals; JIM WORTHEN, Justice - 12th Court

of Appeals; THOMAS R. PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, Texas

Supreme Court; NATHAN L. HECHT, Justice - Texas

Supreme Court; CRAIG T. ENOCH, Justice - Texas Supreme

Court; PRISCILLA R. OWENS, Justice - Texas Supreme

Court; JAMES A. BARKER, Justice - Texas Supreme Court;

GREG ABBOTT, Justice - Texas Supreme Court; DEBORAH G.

HANKINSON, Justice - Texas Supreme Court; HARRIET 

O’NEILL, Justice - Texas Supreme Court; ALBERTO R.

GONZALEZ, Justice - Texas Supreme Court,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:00-CV-311

- - - - - - - - - -

October 26, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eric R. Hinkle, a Texas prisoner (# 849430), appeals from

the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

civil rights complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a
No. 01-40381

-2-

claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). 

The district court concluded that the judicial defendants

were entitled to absolute judicial immunity and that, to the

extent that Hinkle sought injunctive relief, he was seeking

review of adverse state-court decisions, a remedy barred by the

“Rooker/Feldman” doctrine. See Davis v. Bayless, 70 F.3d 367,

376 (5th Cir. 1995); Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413

(1923); District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460

U.S. 462 (1983). The district court did not abuse its discretion

in concluding that, based on these grounds, Hinkle’s complaint

was frivolous. See Harper v. Showers, 174 F.3d 716, 718 (5th

Cir. 1998). 

Because Hinkle’s appeal is without arguable merit, the

appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2; see Howard v.

King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). The dismissal of the

instant appeal as frivolous and the district court’s dismissal of

his § 1983 complaint as frivolous each count as a “strike” under

the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba

v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 1996). Hinkle is

cautioned that, once he accumulates three strikes, he may not

proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is

incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under

imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,997
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,109
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,585)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,987
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,266
<PP&E>                                           4,851
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,156
<BONDS>                                          4,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         66
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,814)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,408
<SALES>                                         47,386
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,386
<CGS>                                           25,424
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   234
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (640)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,461)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       182
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,643)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)


</TABLE>
#### Henry J. Washburn, Appellant, *v.*The Ranier Company et al., Defendants, and John T. Ranier et al., Respondents.

*Washburn*v. *Ranier,*173 App. Div. 906, affirmed.

(Argued November 14, 1918;

decided December 3, 1918.)

Appeal from a judgment, entered March 23, 1916, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff and directing a dismissal of the complaint which alleged that the plaintiff was a creditor of the defendant Ranier Company and the respondents were directors from May 1, 1907, to November 1, 1907; that on the 31st day of October, 1907, the defendant corporation, by order of its board of directors, sold, assigned and transferred to the Ranier Motor Car Company all of its assets and property rights, privileges and franchises, for an alleged consideration of $800,000 worth of the common capital stock of the said Ranier Motor Car Company; that thereafter the Ranier Motor Car Company was- adjudged a bankrupt and was discharged of its debts; that the property transferred by the Ranier Company to the Ranier Motor Car Company constituted a trust fund in the hands of the defendants for the payment of plaintiff’s debt. The answers alleged as separate defenses that the plaintiff had consented to, ratified and confirmed all the acts of the Ranier Company and its board of directors in making the contract as aforesaid, by filing with the *724referee in bankruptcy and against the estate of the Ranier Motor Car Company a claim for the whole amount of-his judgment thereafter recovered, alleging and affirming as the basis of his said claim the aforesaid contract made in his behalf, whereby the Ranier Motor Car Company agreed to pay any judgment for any damages that the plaintiff might thereafter recover against the Ranier Company.

*Roy C. Gasset*and *Frederick W. Sparks*for appellant.

*Henry A. Rubino*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.