alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**659 KA 10-01622**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
RAY D. POTTER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (MARY-JEAN BOWMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MICHAEL J. VIOLANTE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (THOMAS H. BRANDT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Matthew J. Murphy, III, J.), rendered July 12, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed ( see People v Lococo , 92 NY2d 825, 827).

Entered: June 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
#### STATE v. REISCH

No. 4 PC.

Case below: 20 N.C. App. 481.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 March 1974.
#### STATE v. BARNER

No. 89 PC.

Case below: 35 N.C. App. 412.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 May 1978.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF THORATEC LABORATORIES
CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT
ON FORM 10-K PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES & EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 1, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                       1,696,522
<SECURITIES>                                   276,464
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,485,982
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (32,795)
<INVENTORY>                                  6,611,487
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,462,977
<PP&E>                                      12,228,805
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,667,991)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,060,438
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,929,871
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    72,911,638
<OTHER-SE>                                (52,635,365)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,060,438
<SALES>                                     22,507,884
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,199,779
<CGS>                                        9,738,946
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,738,946
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,249,943
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,789,110)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,789,110)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,789,110)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03350-SAS Document 5 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03350-SAS Document 5 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03350-SAS Document 5 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cr-00338-WHP Document 13 Filed 08/22/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cr-00338-WHP Document 13 Filed 08/22/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2








KINDER MORGAN, INC.


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906


OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Kinder Morgan, Inc. and will be retained by Kinder Morgan, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








Dated:  August 11, 2009

/s/ Kimberly A. DangKimberly A. Dang
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE CRIMIN AL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF DALLAS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 25 th day of February , 201 5 , the cause on appeal to affirm between

BRIAN GLENN JORDAN , Appellant

No. 05

- 1 4

- 0 0 358

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Cr imin al District Court

No. 2 , Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F 0 9

- 33222

- I

. Opinion delivered by Justice Evans

, Chief

Justice Wright and Justice Myers participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and executed.

WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 7 th day of May

, 201 5

.

LISA MATZ, Clerk
* Pursuantto 5TH CIR.R.47.5,the court has determined thatthis opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances setforth

in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50739

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

versus

PEDRO BARRAZA-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(3:05-CR-1920-ALL)

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

Pedro Barraza-Rodriguez pleaded guilty to violating 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326 by reentering the United States after having been deported.

The district court sentenced him to 57 months in prison to be

followed by three years of supervised release. He contends his

sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to

consider his long ties to the United States and his alcoholism as

factors in mitigation of his sentence. He also challenges the

constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony
2

and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than

elements of the offense. 

Sentences imposed under 8 U.S.C. § 3553(a) are reviewed on

appeal for reasonableness. United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220,

261-262 (2005); United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir.

2005), cert denied, 546 U.S. 828 (2005). As Barraza-Rodriguez

concedes, his first contention, which challenges our precedent

holding sentences within properly calculated guidelines ranges are

presumed to be reasonable, fails in the light of Rita v. United

States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462 (2007).

Barraza-Rodriguez does not maintain his guidelines range was

improperly calculated. Moreover, a sentence within a properly

calculated guidelines range is entitled to great deference.

Mares, 402 F.3d at 520. In reviewing such a sentence, we merely

ask whether the district court abused its discretion in imposing

it. Rita, 127 S. Ct. at 2465. Barraza-Rodriguez has not shown an

abuse of discretion. 

Barraza-Rodriguez’s second claim challenges, in the light of

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the constitutionality

of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated

felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than as elements of

the offense that must be found by a jury. This issue is foreclosed

by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998).

Although Barraza-Rodriguez contends Almendarez-Torres was
3

incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would

overrule Almendarez-Torres in the light of Apprendi, we have

repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that

Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v.

Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 546

U.S. 919 (2005). Barraza-Rodriguez properly concedes his argument

is foreclosed in the light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit

precedent, but raises it here to preserve it for further possible

review.

AFFIRMED
#### STATE v. PAIVA

No. 141 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 186.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 June 1976.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflict Meeting.                    

*Date:*                         November 3, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         11 a.m. to 1 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         JoAnn McConnell, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NIH/NINDS/Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, Msc 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, (301) 496-5324,                         *mcconnej@ninds.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 28, 2005.

Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-21992 Filed 11-3-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
( 

----
/ 


-----





-\ 
-; 

j 

JEFF L ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE 

DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE 

BOB PEMBERTON, JUSTICE 

MELISSA OOODWIN, JUSTICE 

SCOTT K. FIELD, JUSTICE 

CINDY OLSON BOURLAND, JUSTICE 

Ms. Mary E_ Allen 

General Delivery 

823 Congress Suite 150 

Austin, TX 78701 

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 

Trial Court Case Number: 

Style: Mary E. Allen 

COURT OF APPEALS 

THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

P_O_ BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547 

www.txcourts.gov/3rdcoaaspx 

(512) 463-1733 

January 23, 2015 

03-14-00670-CV 

C-1-CV -14-00723 5 

JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK 

v. Wells Branch Self Storage 

Dear Ms. Mary E_ Allen: 

The Clerk of this Court filed appellant's notice of appeal on Wednesday, October 22, 2014. 

The clerk's and reporter's records were due in this Court on Monday, December 08, 2014 and 

December 15, 2014 respectively, and are overdue. Appellant has been found to be not indigent. 

Notice was received from the district clerk's office of Travis County, Texas on January 23, 2015, 

indicating appellant has neither paid, nor made arrangements for payment, for the clerk's record. 

Accordingly, the clerk's record will not be timely filed. 

Appellant is requested to make arrangements for the record and submit a status report 

regarding this appeal. A response regarding this matter is requested by this Court on or before 

Mondav, February 02, 2015_ Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this appeal for want 

of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). 

If appellant has not already done so, he is instructed to make a written request to the court 

reporter and make arrangements for payment of the record. If appellant does not wish to pursue this 

appeal, please file a motion to dismiss. 

Very truly yours, 

JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK 

Amy Strother, Deputy Clerk 

cc: Ms. Emily Newell 

/ . -"/'
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.07 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## 

# U.S. – Russia Joint Commission on POW/MIAs host 22nd Plenum in Washington D.C. 

By DPAA Public Affairs

                WASHINGTON  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Intergovernmental Advisory Committee (IAC), Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP), has scheduled a meeting on November 30, 2005 from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the Oregon Convention Center, downstairs conference room A106, 777 NE., Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Portland, OR 97232, 503-235-7575. The purpose of the meeting is to review progress on addressing key findings and trends from the April 19-20, 2005 Science and the Northwest Forest Plan, Knowledge Gained Over a Decade conference hosted by the USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, and to collect advice regarding the implementation improvement strategies being drafted.

The meeting is open to the public and fully accessible for people with disabilities. A 10-minute time slot is reserved for public comments at 9:10 a.m. Interpreters are available upon request at least 10 days prior to the meeting. Written comments may be submitted for the meeting record. Interested persons are encouraged to attend.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Questions regarding this meeting may be directed to Kath Collier, Management Analyst, Regional Ecosystem Office, 333 SW. First Avenue, P.O. Box 3623, Portland, OR 97208 (telephone: 503-808-2165).

Dated: October 31, 2005.

Anne Badgley,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 05-22723 Filed 11-15-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1486

THOMAS C. SMITH, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICAN AIR FORCE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith,

District Judge. (CA-04-121-4)

Submitted: June 23, 2005 Decided: June 28, 2005

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas C. Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Susan Lynn Watt, Assistant

United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Thomas C. Smith, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his civil complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. United

States of Am. Air Force, No. CA-04-121-4 (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 9 &

entered Feb. 10, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED