# C_2008073EN.01001001.xml

| 19.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/10

---

COUNCIL OPINION

COUNCIL OPINION

of 4 March 2008

on the stability programme of Cyprus, 2007-2011

(2008/C 73/03)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 of 7 July 1997 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies (1), and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,

1

Having regard to the recommendation of the Commission,

After consulting the Economic and Financial Committee,

HAS DELIVERED THIS OPINION:

| (1) | On 4 March 2008, the Council examined the first stability programme of Cyprus, which covers the period 2007 to 2011 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 4 March 2008, the Council examined the first stability programme of Cyprus, which covers the period 2007 to 2011 (2).

2

| (2) | Over the last ten years, Cyprus has been characterised by solid economic growth, albeit with fluctuations in some years, which reflect exposure of the small open economy to external shocks.
  Fiscal policy has not always taken advantage of favourable cyclical conditions to achieve budgetary targets close-to-balance or in surplus, which would provide a safety margin to normal fluctuations, and allow automatic stabilizers to operate fully in economic downturns. This highlights the need for avoidance of pro-cyclical stance in good times. In the last four years the Cypriot authorities embarked on a successful, mainly, revenue-based fiscal consolidation, which brought the general government deficit from 6,5 % of GDP in 2003 to 1,2 % in 2006. On the back of a likely transitory tax-rich composition of growth, which brought about exceptionally high government receipts, the budget balance is currently estimated at a surplus of 1,5 % of GDP in 2007. Furthermore, debt declined from a 69 % of GDP in 2003 down to about 60 % in 2007. The limited primary current expenditure restraint and the likely transitory character of composition effects in the recent increase in tax revenues, highlight the need for further improvements in expenditure control. This would help to stabilise the economy in the new context of euro area membership. The reform of the pension system and a timely implementation of the adopted reforms in health care would also contribute to the control of primary spending, while underpinning the sustainability of public finances in the long run. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Over the last ten years, Cyprus has been characterised by solid economic growth, albeit with fluctuations in some years, which reflect exposure of the small open economy to external shocks.

Fiscal policy has not always taken advantage of favourable cyclical conditions to achieve budgetary targets close-to-balance or in surplus, which would provide a safety margin to normal fluctuations, and allow automatic stabilizers to operate fully in economic downturns. This highlights the need for avoidance of pro-cyclical stance in good times. In the last four years the Cypriot authorities embarked on a successful, mainly, revenue-based fiscal consolidation, which brought the general government deficit from 6,5 % of GDP in 2003 to 1,2 % in 2006. On the back of a likely transitory tax-rich composition of growth, which brought about exceptionally high government receipts, the budget balance is currently estimated at a surplus of 1,5 % of GDP in 2007. Furthermore, debt declined from a 69 % of GDP in 2003 down to about 60 % in 2007. The limited primary current expenditure restraint and the likely transitory character of composition effects in the recent increase in tax revenues, highlight the need for further improvements in expenditure control. This would help to stabilise the economy in the new context of euro area membership. The reform of the pension system and a timely implementation of the adopted reforms in health care would also contribute to the control of primary spending, while underpinning the sustainability of public finances in the long run.

| (3) | The macroeconomic scenario underlying the programme envisages that real GDP growth will moderate slightly from 4,2 % in 2007 to some 4 % on average over the rest of the programme period. Assessed against currently available information (3), this scenario appears to be based on plausible growth assumptions until 2009, while they appear to be slightly on the high side thereafter. The programme's projections for inflation appear realistic but on the backdrop of the latest developments in oil and food prices at international level, the balance of risks is somewhat tilted on the upside. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The macroeconomic scenario underlying the programme envisages that real GDP growth will moderate slightly from 4,2 % in 2007 to some 4 % on average over the rest of the programme period. Assessed against currently available information (3), this scenario appears to be based on plausible growth assumptions until 2009, while they appear to be slightly on the high side thereafter. The programme's projections for inflation appear realistic but on the backdrop of the latest developments in oil and food prices at international level, the balance of risks is somewhat tilted on the upside.

3

| (4) | For 2007, the stability programme estimates the general government surplus at 1,5 % of GDP, more than 3 percentage points of GDP better than the target of a deficit of 1,6 % of GDP set in the last update of the convergence programme. The marked turnaround in 2007 is attributed to exceptional rise in total revenues, due to especially high tax receipts brought by the strong profitability of the financial sector and the booming investment in real estate. Part of the increase in tax bases and in the associated revenues does not appear to be permanent. The 2007 estimated outturn respects the invitation in the Council opinion of 27 February 2007 on the last update of the convergence programme (4) to ‘implement the fiscal consolidation path as foreseen in the programme’. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

For 2007, the stability programme estimates the general government surplus at 1,5 % of GDP, more than 3 percentage points of GDP better than the target of a deficit of 1,6 % of GDP set in the last update of the convergence programme. The marked turnaround in 2007 is attributed to exceptional rise in total revenues, due to especially high tax receipts brought by the strong profitability of the financial sector and the booming investment in real estate. Part of the increase in tax bases and in the associated revenues does not appear to be permanent. The 2007 estimated outturn respects the invitation in the Council opinion of 27 February 2007 on the last update of the convergence programme (4) to ‘implement the fiscal consolidation path as foreseen in the programme’.

4

| (5) | In view of the better-than-expected 2007 outturn, the budgetary targets presented in the stability programme are much improved compared to those in the last update of the convergence programme against a broadly unchanged macroeconomic background. The stability programme puts forward a more ambitious medium-term objective (MTO) of a balanced position in structural terms (i.e. in cyclically-adjusted terms net of one-off and other temporary measures), compared to a structural deficit of 0,5 % of GDP previously. The budgetary strategy in the stability programme aims at maintaining this new MTO, which has already been over-achieved in 2007, over the programme period. The general government surplus is planned to decline to 0,7 % of GDP by 2011, from 1,5 % in 2007; in primary terms, the drop is more pronounced, to 2,8 % of GDP in 2011 from 4,7 %. The narrowing of the surplus mainly reflects a fall in the share of total revenues in GDP by 1,25 percentage points as total expenditure is planned to decline by just 0,25 of a percentage point of GDP.
  The latter mainly reflects important savings on interest expenditure as primary expenditure is set to increase by 0,25 of a percentage point, as a containment of expenditure on compensation of employees, subsidies and public investment is more than offset by increases in social payments and other expenditure. The fall in total revenues is concentrated in 2008 (1,5 percentage points of GDP), as half of the extraordinary increase of revenues in 2007, amounting to 1,5 % of GDP, is not expected to continue in 2008. Government gross debt, estimated at 60 % of GDP in 2007, is projected to decline by 11,5 percentage points of GDP in 2008 to 48,5 % of GDP. This is mainly due to a high primary surplus and a large debt-decreasing stock-flow adjustment, resulting from a large decumulation of financial assets associated with the sinking funds. Thereafter, debt-to-GDP ratio is projected to decline further by 8 percentage points of GDP over the programme period to 40,5 % by 2011. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

In view of the better-than-expected 2007 outturn, the budgetary targets presented in the stability programme are much improved compared to those in the last update of the convergence programme against a broadly unchanged macroeconomic background. The stability programme puts forward a more ambitious medium-term objective (MTO) of a balanced position in structural terms (i.e. in cyclically-adjusted terms net of one-off and other temporary measures), compared to a structural deficit of 0,5 % of GDP previously. The budgetary strategy in the stability programme aims at maintaining this new MTO, which has already been over-achieved in 2007, over the programme period. The general government surplus is planned to decline to 0,7 % of GDP by 2011, from 1,5 % in 2007; in primary terms, the drop is more pronounced, to 2,8 % of GDP in 2011 from 4,7 %. The narrowing of the surplus mainly reflects a fall in the share of total revenues in GDP by 1,25 percentage points as total expenditure is planned to decline by just 0,25 of a percentage point of GDP.

The latter mainly reflects important savings on interest expenditure as primary expenditure is set to increase by 0,25 of a percentage point, as a containment of expenditure on compensation of employees, subsidies and public investment is more than offset by increases in social payments and other expenditure. The fall in total revenues is concentrated in 2008 (1,5 percentage points of GDP), as half of the extraordinary increase of revenues in 2007, amounting to 1,5 % of GDP, is not expected to continue in 2008. Government gross debt, estimated at 60 % of GDP in 2007, is projected to decline by 11,5 percentage points of GDP in 2008 to 48,5 % of GDP. This is mainly due to a high primary surplus and a large debt-decreasing stock-flow adjustment, resulting from a large decumulation of financial assets associated with the sinking funds. Thereafter, debt-to-GDP ratio is projected to decline further by 8 percentage points of GDP over the programme period to 40,5 % by 2011.

ratio

| (6) | The budgetary outcomes in 2008 and 2009 could be better than projected in the programme but worse thereafter. The programme assumes that only part of the better-than-expected revenues in 2007 is carried over to subsequent years. Although uncertain in the absence of more detailed data, there seems to be scope for a higher degree of carryover, especially in 2008 and 2009. A negative risk to revenues stems from the fact that the macroeconomic scenario embodies favourable projections for private consumption growth in the outer programme years. The reliance on expenditure ceilings, which were introduced as recently as 2006, constitutes a further risk as their coverage is not complete and in particular enforcement mechanisms are not fully specified. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

The budgetary outcomes in 2008 and 2009 could be better than projected in the programme but worse thereafter. The programme assumes that only part of the better-than-expected revenues in 2007 is carried over to subsequent years. Although uncertain in the absence of more detailed data, there seems to be scope for a higher degree of carryover, especially in 2008 and 2009. A negative risk to revenues stems from the fact that the macroeconomic scenario embodies favourable projections for private consumption growth in the outer programme years. The reliance on expenditure ceilings, which were introduced as recently as 2006, constitutes a further risk as their coverage is not complete and in particular enforcement mechanisms are not fully specified.

| (7) | In view of this risk assessment, the budgetary stance in the programme seems sufficient to maintain the new MTO throughout the programme period, as envisaged in the programme. The 1,5 % of GDP in revenues considered by the programme as temporary, although likely transitory in nature, does not qualify as a one-off and it is not considered as such by the Commission services. Given the good times, the structural surplus reduction by more than 1 percentage points of GDP in 2008, from 1,75 % of GDP the previous year, may imply a pro-cyclical fiscal stance, which would not be in line with the Stability and Growth Pact. However, the consideration by the Government that the rise in revenues in 2007 may be only partially permanent reflects a prudent budgetary approach, according to which revenues from a particularly tax-intensive composition of growth should not trigger additional permanent expenditure. Although the planned deterioration of the budgetary position compared to 2007 reflects to a large extent an expected normalisation of tax revenues, there is a risk that the stance in 2008 may turn out to be pro-cyclical, given the risks associated to the enforcement of the expenditure ceilings. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

In view of this risk assessment, the budgetary stance in the programme seems sufficient to maintain the new MTO throughout the programme period, as envisaged in the programme. The 1,5 % of GDP in revenues considered by the programme as temporary, although likely transitory in nature, does not qualify as a one-off and it is not considered as such by the Commission services. Given the good times, the structural surplus reduction by more than 1 percentage points of GDP in 2008, from 1,75 % of GDP the previous year, may imply a pro-cyclical fiscal stance, which would not be in line with the Stability and Growth Pact. However, the consideration by the Government that the rise in revenues in 2007 may be only partially permanent reflects a prudent budgetary approach, according to which revenues from a particularly tax-intensive composition of growth should not trigger additional permanent expenditure. Although the planned deterioration of the budgetary position compared to 2007 reflects to a large extent an expected normalisation of tax revenues, there is a risk that the stance in 2008 may turn out to be pro-cyclical, given the risks associated to the enforcement of the expenditure ceilings.

| (8) | Cyprus appears to be at high risk with regard to the sustainability of public finances. The long-term budgetary impact of ageing is among the highest in the EU, influenced notably by a very large increase in pension expenditure as a share of GDP. The budgetary position in 2007 as estimated in the programme contributes to offsetting part of the projected considerable long-term budgetary impact of an ageing population but it is not sufficient to cover it. Maintaining high primary surpluses and adopting pension reform measures aimed at containing the significant increase in age-related expenditures, as currently envisaged, would contribute to reducing risks to the sustainability of public finances. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

Cyprus appears to be at high risk with regard to the sustainability of public finances. The long-term budgetary impact of ageing is among the highest in the EU, influenced notably by a very large increase in pension expenditure as a share of GDP. The budgetary position in 2007 as estimated in the programme contributes to offsetting part of the projected considerable long-term budgetary impact of an ageing population but it is not sufficient to cover it. Maintaining high primary surpluses and adopting pension reform measures aimed at containing the significant increase in age-related expenditures, as currently envisaged, would contribute to reducing risks to the sustainability of public finances.

| (9) | The stability programme is fully consistent with the October 2007 implementation report of the national reform programme. In particular, the budgetary projections incorporate the budgetary cost of the various projects and measures included in the national reform programme, for example to foster a knowledge-based economy, to promote R&D, to enhance human capital development. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

The stability programme is fully consistent with the October 2007 implementation report of the national reform programme. In particular, the budgetary projections incorporate the budgetary cost of the various projects and measures included in the national reform programme, for example to foster a knowledge-based economy, to promote R&D, to enhance human capital development.

| (10) | The budgetary strategy in the programme is broadly consistent with the country-specific broad economic policy guidelines included in the integrated guidelines and the guidelines for euro area Member States in the area of budgetary policies issued in the context of the Lisbon strategy. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

The budgetary strategy in the programme is broadly consistent with the country-specific broad economic policy guidelines included in the integrated guidelines and the guidelines for euro area Member States in the area of budgetary policies issued in the context of the Lisbon strategy.

| (11) | As regards the data requirements specified in the code of conduct for stability and convergence programmes, the programme provides all required and most of the optional data (5). |
| --- | --- |

(11)

As regards the data requirements specified in the code of conduct for stability and convergence programmes, the programme provides all required and most of the optional data (5).

5

The overall conclusion is that the budgetary strategy in the programme should be sufficient to maintain a sound budgetary position and macroeconomic stability throughout the period. The programme puts forward a more ambitious MTO of a balanced position in structural terms (compared to a deficit of 0,5 % of GDP previously), which has already been over-achieved in 2007. This is the result of an unexpected increase in total revenues by over 3 percentage points of GDP, largely explained by composition effects associated to the strong profitability of the financial sector and the buoyant investment in real estate, which are projected by the programme to return to historical trends in the coming years. The budgetary targets, which are significantly better than in the previous programme, could be overachieved in 2008 and 2009 given the better 2007 base.

Thereafter, they could be worse given the favourable growth assumptions. Although the planned reduction of the budgetary surplus compared to 2007 reflects to a large extent an expected normalisation of tax revenues, there is a risk that the stance in 2008 may turn out to be pro-cyclical. The level of debt is projected to decline significantly, especially in 2008. Given the projected increase in age-related spending, the reform of the pension system and a timely implementation of adopted reforms in health care, would have a positive effect on the long-term sustainability of public finances, which appears to be at high risk.

In view of the above assessment, Cyprus is invited to:

| (i) | avoid pro-cyclical fiscal policies by further improving the control of current expenditures, while using revenue windfalls to further reduce debt; |
| --- | --- |

(i)

avoid pro-cyclical fiscal policies by further improving the control of current expenditures, while using revenue windfalls to further reduce debt;

| (ii) | contain public expenditure, notably by reforming the pension system and timely implementing the adopted reforms in health care in order to improve the long-term sustainability of the public finances. |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

contain public expenditure, notably by reforming the pension system and timely implementing the adopted reforms in health care in order to improve the long-term sustainability of the public finances.

Comparison of key macroeconomic and budgetary projections

| | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Real GDP
  (% change) | SP Dec 2007 | 3,8 | 4,2 | 4,1 | 4,0 | 4,0 | 4,0 |
| COM Nov 2007 | 3,8 | 3,8 | 3,9 | 3,9 | n.a. | n.a. |
| CP Dec 2006 | 3,7 | 3,9 | 4,1 | 4,1 | 4,1 | n.a. |
| HICP inflation
  (%) | SP Dec 2007 | 2,2 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
| COM Nov 2007 | 2,2 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 2,1 | n.a. | n.a. |
| CP Dec 2006 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 2,0 | 2,0 | n.a. |
| Output gap (6)

  (% of potential GDP) | SP Dec 2007 | – 1,0 | – 0,7 | – 0,6 | – 0,6 | – 0,4 | 0,0 |
| COM Nov 2007 (7) | – 1,4 | – 1,1 | – 0,8 | – 0,6 | n.a. | n.a. |
| CP Dec 2006 | – 1,0 | – 1,1 | – 1,1 | – 1,1 | – 1,1 | n.a. |
| Net lending/borrowing vis-à-vis the rest of the world
  (% of GDP) | SP Dec 2007 | – 5,9 | – 6,6 | – 6,5 | – 6,3 | – 5,9 | – 5,6 |
| COM Nov 2007 | – 5,7 | – 5,8 | – 5,7 | – 5,5 | n.a. | n.a. |
| CP Dec 2006 | – 6,4 | – 5,8 | – 5,4 | – 4,8 | – 4,2 | n.a. |
| General government balance
  (% of GDP) | SP Dec 2007 | – 1,2 | 1,5 | 0,5 | 0,5 | 0,7 | 0,7 |
| COM Nov 2007 | – 1,2 | – 1,0 | – 0,8 | – 0,6 | n.a. | n.a. |
| CP Dec 2006 | – 1,9 | – 1,6 | – 0,7 | – 0,4 | – 0,1 | n.a. |
| Primary balance
  (% of GDP) | SP Dec 2007 | 2,1 | 4,7 | 3,4 | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,8 |
| COM Nov 2007 | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,2 | 2,2 | n.a. | n.a. |
| CP Dec 2006 | 1,4 | 1,4 | 2,1 | 2,1 | 2,2 | n.a. |
| Cyclically-adjusted balance (6)

  (% of GDP) | SP Dec 2007 | – 0,8 | 1,8 | 0,7 | 0,7 | 0,8 | 0,7 |
| COM Nov 2007 | – 0,7 | – 0,6 | – 0,5 | – 0,4 | n.a. | n.a. |
| CP Dec 2006 | – 1,5 | – 1,2 | – 0,3 | 0,0 | 0,3 | n.a. |
| Structural balance (8)

  (% of GDP) | SP Dec 2007 | – 0,8 | 0,3 | 0,7 | 0,7 | 0,8 | 0,7 |
| COM Nov 2007 | – 0,7 | – 0,6 | – 0,5 | – 0,4 | n.a. | n.a. |
| CP Dec 2006 | – 1,9 | – 1,2 | – 0,3 | 0,0 | 0,3 | n.a. |
| Government gross debt
  (% of GDP) | SP Dec 2007 | 65,2 | 60,0 | 48,5 | 45,3 | 43,8 | 40,5 |
| COM Nov 2007 | 65,2 | 60,5 | 53,3 | 49,6 | n.a. | n.a. |
| CP Dec 2006 | 64,7 | 60,5 | 52,5 | 49,0 | 46,1 | n.a. |
| Convergence programme (CP); Stability programme (SP); Commission services' autumn 2007 economic forecasts (COM); Commission services' calculations. |

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

Real GDP

(% change)

SP Dec 2007

SP Dec 2007

3,8

3,8

4,2

4,2

4,1

4,1

4,0

4,0

4,0

4,0

4,0

4,0

COM Nov 2007

3,8

3,8

3,9

3,9

n.a.

n.a.

CP Dec 2006

CP Dec 2006

3,7

3,7

3,9

3,9

4,1

4,1

4,1

4,1

4,1

4,1

n.a.

n.a.

HICP inflation

(%)

SP Dec 2007

SP Dec 2007

2,2

2,2

2,2

2,2

2,5

2,5

2,0

2,0

2,0

2,0

2,0

2,0

COM Nov 2007

2,2

2,0

2,3

2,1

n.a.

n.a.

CP Dec 2006

CP Dec 2006

2,4

2,4

2,5

2,5

2,4

2,4

2,0

2,0

2,0

2,0

n.a.

n.a.

Output gap (6)

6

(% of potential GDP)

SP Dec 2007

SP Dec 2007

– 1,0

– 1,0

– 0,7

– 0,7

– 0,6

– 0,6

– 0,6

– 0,6

– 0,4

– 0,4

0,0

0,0

COM Nov 2007 (7)

7

– 1,4

– 1,1

– 0,8

– 0,6

n.a.

n.a.

CP Dec 2006

CP Dec 2006

– 1,0

– 1,0

– 1,1

– 1,1

– 1,1

– 1,1

– 1,1

– 1,1

– 1,1

– 1,1

n.a.

n.a.

Net lending/borrowing vis-à-vis the rest of the world

vis-à-vis

(% of GDP)

SP Dec 2007

SP Dec 2007

– 5,9

– 5,9

– 6,6

– 6,6

– 6,5

– 6,5

– 6,3

– 6,3

– 5,9

– 5,9

– 5,6

– 5,6

COM Nov 2007

– 5,7

– 5,8

– 5,7

– 5,5

n.a.

n.a.

CP Dec 2006

CP Dec 2006

– 6,4

– 6,4

– 5,8

– 5,8

– 5,4

– 5,4

– 4,8

– 4,8

– 4,2

– 4,2

n.a.

n.a.

General government balance

(% of GDP)

SP Dec 2007

SP Dec 2007

– 1,2

– 1,2

1,5

1,5

0,5

0,5

0,5

0,5

0,7

0,7

0,7

0,7

COM Nov 2007

– 1,2

– 1,0

– 0,8

– 0,6

n.a.

n.a.

CP Dec 2006

CP Dec 2006

– 1,9

– 1,9

– 1,6

– 1,6

– 0,7

– 0,7

– 0,4

– 0,4

– 0,1

– 0,1

n.a.

n.a.

Primary balance

(% of GDP)

SP Dec 2007

SP Dec 2007

2,1

2,1

4,7

4,7

3,4

3,4

2,9

2,9

2,9

2,9

2,8

2,8

COM Nov 2007

2,1

2,2

2,2

2,2

n.a.

n.a.

CP Dec 2006

CP Dec 2006

1,4

1,4

1,4

1,4

2,1

2,1

2,1

2,1

2,2

2,2

n.a.

n.a.

Cyclically-adjusted balance (6)

6

(% of GDP)

SP Dec 2007

SP Dec 2007

– 0,8

– 0,8

1,8

1,8

0,7

0,7

0,7

0,7

0,8

0,8

0,7

0,7

COM Nov 2007

– 0,7

– 0,6

– 0,5

– 0,4

n.a.

n.a.

CP Dec 2006

CP Dec 2006

– 1,5

– 1,5

– 1,2

– 1,2

– 0,3

– 0,3

0,0

0,0

0,3

0,3

n.a.

n.a.

Structural balance (8)

8

(% of GDP)

SP Dec 2007

SP Dec 2007

– 0,8

– 0,8

0,3

0,3

0,7

0,7

0,7

0,7

0,8

0,8

0,7

0,7

COM Nov 2007

– 0,7

– 0,6

– 0,5

– 0,4

n.a.

n.a.

CP Dec 2006

CP Dec 2006

– 1,9

– 1,9

– 1,2

– 1,2

– 0,3

– 0,3

0,0

0,0

0,3

0,3

n.a.

n.a.

Government gross debt

(% of GDP)

SP Dec 2007

SP Dec 2007

65,2

65,2

60,0

60,0

48,5

48,5

45,3

45,3

43,8

43,8

40,5

40,5

COM Nov 2007

65,2

60,5

53,3

49,6

n.a.

n.a.

CP Dec 2006

CP Dec 2006

64,7

64,7

60,5

60,5

52,5

52,5

49,0

49,0

46,1

46,1

n.a.

n.a.

Convergence programme (CP); Stability programme (SP); Commission services' autumn 2007 economic forecasts (COM); Commission services' calculations.

Convergence programme (CP); Stability programme (SP); Commission services' autumn 2007 economic forecasts (COM); Commission services' calculations.

---

(1)  OJ L 209, 2.8.1997, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1055/2005 (OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 1). The documents referred to in this text can be found at the following website:

1

http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/about/activities/sgp/main_en.htm

(2)  The update was submitted 1 week beyond the 1 December deadline set in the code of conduct.

2

(3)  The assessment takes into account notably the Commission services' autumn 2007 forecast and the Commission assessment of the October implementation report of the national reform programme.

3

(4)  OJ C 71, 28.3.2007, p. 16.

4

(5)  In particular, the capital account data for the years 2007-2011 in the table of sectoral balances are not provided, which have the effect of making the assessment more difficult.

5

(6)  Output gaps and cyclically-adjusted balances from the programmes as recalculated by Commission services on the basis of the information in the programmes.

6

(7)  Based on estimated potential growth of 3,5 %, 3,5 %, 3,6 % and 3,7 % respectively in the period 2006-2009.

7

(8)  Cyclically-adjusted balance excluding one-off and other temporary measures. There are no one-off and other temporary measures according to the Commission services' autumn forecast. The stability programme considers revenues in 2007 amounting to 1,5 % of GDP as one-offs. Although transitory in nature, this amount of revenues does not qualify as a one-off according to the Commission services.

8

Sources:

Convergence programme (CP); Stability programme (SP); Commission services' autumn 2007 economic forecasts (COM); Commission services' calculations.

Convergence programme (CP); Stability programme (SP); Commission services' autumn 2007 economic forecasts (COM); Commission services' calculations.

---