alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-4 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-4 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-4 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-4 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-4 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-4 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-4 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-4 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-4 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-4 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-4 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-4 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-4 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-4 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-4 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-4 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-4 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-4 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-4 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03341-CM-RLE Document 14-4 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 20 of 20
#### Ronald G. BEAGLES, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Maggie MILLER-STOUT, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 02-36004.

D.C. No. CV-02-00203-MJP.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 2005.*

Decided April 4, 2005.

Ronald G. Beagles, Seattle, WA, pro se.

John Joseph Samson, Esq., Christine O. Gregoire, Esq., Office of the Washington Attorney General, Olympia, WA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Washington state prisoner Ronald G. Beagles appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition, challenging his 1998 conviction for second degree assault. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we vacate and remand.

After the district court determined that the instant § 2254 petition was a mixed petition, the district court erred by affirmatively foreclosing the option of proceeding with the exhausted claim and requesting a stay. *See Rose v. Lundy,*455 U.S. 509, 510, 102 S.Ct. 1198, 71 L.Ed.2d 379 (1982); *Kelly v. Small,*315 F.3d 1063, 1069-70 (9th Cir.2003) (requiring district court to offer petitioner the opportunity to dismiss unexhausted claims, and to consider the alternative of staying the petition after dismissal of unexhausted claims, in order to permit petitioner to exhaust those claims and add them by amendment to his stayed federal petition); *cf. Pliler v. Ford,*542 U.S. 225, 124 S.Ct. 2441, 2447, 159 L.Ed.2d 338 (2004) (holding that district court is not required to give specific advisements as to the availability and wisdom of these alternatives).

VACATED AND REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 31B**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Michael J. Rockenbach, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Emulex Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13-a-15(f) (15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting,or cause such internal control over financial reporting to be designed underour supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliabilityof financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date: September 14, 2006       /s/ Michael J. Rockenbach Michael J. Rockenbach    Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE v. WALKER

No. 45 PC.

Case below: 7 N.C. App. 548.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 12 May 1970.
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 21 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 21 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 21 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 21 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 21 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 21 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 21 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 7 of 7
U.S. Department of Labor 

"-'CN 2 1999 

Employment Standards Administration 

Office of Workers' Compensation Programs 

Division of Longshore and 

Harbor Workers' Compensation 

Washington, D.C, 20210 

File Number: 

INDUSTRY NOTICE NUMBER #93 

SUBJECT: District of Columbia Special Fund Assessment 

This notice is to advise all authorized District of Columbia insurance carriers 

and self-insurers that the D.C Special Fund has experienced a shortfall in 

calendar year 1999 collections due to erroneous initial reporting of payments 

by several participants. The District of Columbia Special Fund will be 

unable to meet its biweekly disbursement roll to about 700 recipients in 

January 2000. This situation has necessitated an emergency mailing of 

the advance assessment for calendar year 2000. 

Bills for Collection will be mailed prior to December 1, 1999, with payment 

due no later than December 30, 1999. 

This early collection is a manifestation of what will no doubt become a 

chronic problem for the D.C. Special Fund. On this occasion it has been 

caused by the initial erroneous filing of CY98 reports of payments by certain 

insurance carriers which were not corrected until after the final billing had 

been calculated and mailed. 

There is, however, a long term problem with the District of Columbia 

Special Fund assessment. Assessments in D.C. are running at over 

200% of paid indemnity and medical. This rate will grow as the 

assessment base continues to decrease in relation to the needs of the D.C. 

Special Fund. In fact, the divergence will accelerate in the future. 

Please carefully consider the implications of this notice and consider it 

to be a warning of steadily increasing D.C. Special Fund assessments. 

Please direct any questions or comments to Carl Abildso at (202) 693-0801. 

You may also fax your comments to (202) 693-1380. 

/4;/JL 

MICHAEL NISS 

Director, DLHWC 

Working for America's Workforre
#### INSURANCE CO. v. INGRAM, COMR. OF INSURANCE

No. 4 PC.

No. 15 (Fall Term).

Case below: 43 N.C. App. 621.

Petition by Wake Anesthesiology Assoc, and its employees for rehearing is allowed, orders of 1 April 1980 (299 N.C. 736) denying discretionary review and dismissing appeal are rescinded, and petition for discretionary review is now allowed and motion to dismiss appeal is dismissed 6 May 1980.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Unified Western Grocers Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard J. Martin, Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C
Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
the Report.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:    December 15, 2006



/s/    RICHARD J. MARTINRichard J. MartinExecutive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

- PM Ch. 2-1800, FAB Decisions
- Transmittal 13-02, Ch. 2-1800 FAB Decisions
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A0185. DEBORAH SIMMS v. MARK BUTLER, COMMISSIONER OF

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al.

Deborah Simms filed this direct appeal from a superior court order reviewing

a decision by the Georgia Department of Labor’s Board of Review. However, under

OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1), appeals from orders of superior courts reviewing decisions

of state administrative agencies must be initiated by filing an application for

discretionary review. See Dunlap v. City of Atlanta, 272 Ga. 523, 524 (531 SE2d

702) (2000). Simms’s failure to follow the required appellate procedure deprives us

of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

September 27, 2017

09/27/2017
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL

OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter March 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard L. Browdy, President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of and for the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                                         
|------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Richard L. Browdy                                   
|                   |  |  |  | Richard L. Browdy, President and Chief Financial Officer
|                   |  |  |  | (Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of The X-Change Corporation on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Sheriff, President of the X-Change Corporation (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.May 14, 2007/s/ Michael L. Sheriff
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## 

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Uncle Steve returns home from World War II

By Mark OlsenNew Jersey National Guard

                Wrightstown, NJ  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AS
OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           8,973
<SECURITIES>                                     1,891
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,508
<INVENTORY>                                     23,855
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107,750
<PP&E>                                          34,599
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,303
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 163,550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           79,912
<BONDS>                                         10,135
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,527
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   163,550
<SALES>                                        148,801
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               228,169
<CGS>                                           72,070
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,626
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,616
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,332
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,332
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.03
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1






                                   EXHIBIT 23
               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.33-77564) and in
the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-28936, No. 33-40802 and No.
33-82342) of American Bankers Insurance Group, Inc. of our report dated March
12, 1997 appearing on page 40 of this Form 10-K.



/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP


PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP


Miami, Florida
March 28, 1997







                                      E-3
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 216 (Wednesday, November 9, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 68087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22361]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. 
California Olive Ranch, (E.D. Cal.) 2:05-cv-02205-LKK-PAN, was lodged 
with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 
California on November 2, 2005.
    This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the 
United States against California Olive Ranch pursuant to section 309(b) 
and (d) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1319(b) and (d), to obtain 
injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties against the Defendant 
for violating the Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants without a 
permit into the waters of the United States. The proposed Consent 
Decree resolves these allegations by requiring Defendant to mitigate 
the environmental impacts by purchasing mitigation credits at the Dove 
Ridge Conservation Bank and to pay a civil penalty.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Pamela S. 
Tonglao, Trial Attorney, United States Department of Justice, 
Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 23986, Washington, 
DC 20026-3986 and refer to United States v. California Olive Ranch, 
(E.D. Cal.), 2:05-cv-02205-LKK-PAN, DJ <greek-i>90-5-1-1-17457.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be viewed at http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html.

Stephen Samuels,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment & Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 05-22361 Filed 11-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M