alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.25 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

- Transmittal No. 14-02, PM Ch. 2-1600 Recommended Decisions
- PM Ch. 2-1600 Recommended Decisions
<PAGE>   1




EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES

                       MICROS SYSTEMS, INC. SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Jurisdiction
                                                        of
Name of Subsidiary                                 Incorporation
------------------                                 -------------
<S>                                             <C>
MICROS Fidelio Australia                             Australia

MICROS Foreign Sales Corporation                     Barbados

Merchant Information Solutions, Ltd.                  Canada

MICROS of Delaware, Inc.                             Delaware

MSI Delaware, Inc.                                   Delaware

MICROS-Fidelio Software Deutschland GmbH        Federal Republic of
                                                      Germany

MICROS Systems Holdings GmbH                    Federal Republic of
                                                      Germany

MICROS Systems Services GmbH                    Federal Republic of
                                                      Germany

Fidelio Cruise GmbH                             Federal Republic of
                                                      Germany

MICROS Fidelio Software GmbH & Co. KG.          Federal Republic of
                                                      Germany

Fidelio Technologies, Inc.                            Florida

Fidelio-MICROS France, S.A.                           France

Fidelio Hong Kong                                    Hong Kong

Fidelio India Private Ltd.                             India

MICROS Fidelio Italia S.r.l.                           Italy

Merchant Information Solutions, Inc.                 Maryland

Fidelio Nordic Norway A/S                             Norway

MICROS Fidelio Software Portugal, ULDA               Portugal

Fidelio Software (Pte) Ltd.                          Singapore

Fidelio South Africa (Pty.) Ltd.                   South Africa

MICROS-Fidelio Hispania                                Spain

Fidelio Nordic Sweden                                 Sweden

Fidelio Software China Ltd.                            China

MICROS Fidelio Software Thailand Co. Ltd.            Thailand

MICROS Fidelio U.K Limited                        United Kingdom

</TABLE>

The Company has additional subsidiaries, which considered in the aggregate as a
single subsidiary, do not constitute a significant subsidiary.
EXHIBIT 23A
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-34442 and 333-156289) pertaining to stock option plans of AutoInfo, Inc. of our report dated March 29, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of AutoInfo, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.
  /s/ Dworken, Hillman, LaMorte & Sterczala, P.C.Shelton, Connecticut

Dworken, Hillman, LaMorte & Sterczala, P.C.
 March 29, 2010
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.36 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
**Exhibit 10.8**

**AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE**

**to**

**AMENDED AND RESTATED 2004 STOCKOPTION PLAN**

**of**

**SUPREMEINDUSTRIES, INC.**

TheAmended and Restated 2004 Stock Option Plan (the “*Plan*”)of Supreme Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “*Company*”),was adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors effective as of February 7,2006.

Article9 of the Plan provides that the Board of Directors may, at any time, withoutthe consent of the Participants under the Plan, amend the Plan.

Afterreviewing the situation, the Board of Directors has determined that theAmendment below can be made by the Board of Directors in accordance with suchArticle 9 and without the need for shareholder approval of such amendment.

Accordingly,the Board of Directors hereby amends the Plan by deleting the fourth from lastsentence contained in Section 8.3(c) and substituting therefor the following:

*“The option period for a ReloadStock Option will commence on its Date of Grant and expire on such expirationdate as is determined by the Committee (provided that such expiration date isin compliance with the requirements of Section 7.1 of the Plan and is inaccordance with the requirements governing Incentive Stock Options), afterwhich period the Reload Stock Option cannot be exercised.”*

DATEDto be effective October 25, 2006.
|        |   | BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|   |   | SUPREME INDUSTRIES, INC. |
|   |   |                     |
|   |   |                     |
|   |   | By:                      |   | /s/ Herbert M. Gardner |
|   |   |                     |   | Herbert M. Gardner, Chairman of the Board |

 

----
**Exhibit 23.2**
NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”),provides that if any part of a registration statement at the time such partbecomes effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact or anomission to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary tomake the statements therein not misleading, any person acquiring a securitypursuant to such registration statement (unless it is proved that at the timeof such acquisition such person knew of such untruth or omission) may sue,among others, every accountant who has consented to be named as having preparedor certified any part of the registration statement, or as having prepared orcertified any report or valuation which is used in connection with theregistration statement, with respect to the statement in such registrationstatement, report or valuation which purports to have been prepared orcertified by the accountant.
Arthur Andersen LLP audited certain financial information included orincorporated in this Form 10-K. Our consolidated statements of income,comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows and associatedinformation contained in the footnotes to these financial statements for the2000 fiscal year were audited by Arthur Andersen LLP. In 2002, Arthur AndersenLLP ceased operations and we are unable to obtain their written consent to theincorporation by reference of its report on such financial statements, datedFebruary 5, 2001, into registration statements we have filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission. As a result, you may be limited in yourability to recover damages from Arthur Andersen LLP under Section 11 of theSecurities Act of 1933 if it is later determined that there are falsestatements contained in or incorporated by reference into any portions of thisForm 10-K that have been prepared in reliance on financial statements auditedby Arthur Andersen LLP.
NO. 12-09-00231-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

§

IN RE: CONTRACTOR’S SUPPLIES, INC.,

RELATOR § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

§

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

On August 17, 2009, this court delivered an opinion conditionally granting the petition for

writ of mandamus filed by John Oaks as relator. That opinion ordered Respondent to vacate his

order granting John Oaks’s petition for presuit deposition and request to shorten the required notice

period, signed on July 24, 2009, and issue an order denying John Oaks’s petition for presuit

deposition. On September 1, 2009, this court received an order from Respondent that complied with

this court’s order and opinion of July 24, 2009.

All issues attendant to this original proceeding having been disposed of, this mandamus

proceeding has now been rendered moot; therefore, the writ need not issue. Accordingly, this

original proceeding is dismissed.

Opinion delivered September 2, 2009.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
#### MRS. MYRTLE PORTER, by and through her Next Friend, GRADY PORTER v. MARY WILLIAMS JARRELL.

(Filed 22 May 1963.)

Appeal by defendant from *Copeland, S.J.,*October, 1962 Civil Term, RoCKingham Superior Court.

Civil action to recover damages for personal injury plaintiff sustained as a result of being hit by the defendant’s automobile at the intersection of east-west Highway No. 158 and north-south Highway No. 2351 in Rockingham County. The plaintiff, a pedestrian, with an armful of groceries, attempted to cross from the southwest to the northwest corner of the intersection. The evidence favorable to the plaintiff *506tended to show the defendant saw, or should have seen, the plaintiff, a partial cripple, in the act of crossing the intersection; nevertheless, negligently ran over her, proximately causing serious injury.

Issues of negligence, contributory negligence, and damages were submitted to the jury. All were 'answered in favor of the plaintiff. From the judgment in accordance with the verdict, the defendant appealed.

*Gwyn •<& Gwyn, by Allen H. Gwyn, Jr., for plaintiff appellee..*

*Jordan, Wright, Henson A Nichols, Karl N. Hill, Jr., by Karl N. Hill, Jr., for defendant appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The evidence, though conflicting in part, nevertheless was sufficient to go to the jury on the simple issues presented. The court sufficiently charged with respect to the rights and duties of the parties. The jury’s resolution of the disputed facts is conclusive. The record discloses neither valid reason to send the case back, nor likli-hood that another hearing would produce a substantially different result.

No error.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.02 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### LATHAM v. TAYLOR

No. 4 PC.

Case below: 10 N.C. App. 268.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 3 March 1971.
#### Anthony H. BARKATE, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 04-72839.

SEC No. 3-11250.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 2005.*

Decided April 11, 2005.

Anthony H. Barkate, Bakersfield, CA, pro se.

Jonathan G. Katz, Esq., Securities *&*Exchange Commission, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Anthony H. Barkate, a former securities salesperson, petitions pro se for review of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) order sustaining a disciplinary decision of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”) barring Barkate from association with any NASD member brokerage firm. We have jurisdiction under 15 U.S.C. § 78y(a). We review the SEC’s affirmance of the NASD’s imposition of sanctions for abuse of discretion, *McNabb v. SEC,*298 F.3d 1126, 1133 (9th Cir.2002), and the SEC’s factual findings for substantial evidence, *Eichler v. SEC, 757*F.2d 1066, 1069 (9th Cir.1985). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the SEC’s findings that Barkate violated NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040, that he did not submit an outside business activity disclosure form prior to the date upon which he started selling tax lien certificates outside the scope of his regular employment, and that he could not have reasonably believed that these certificates were not securities. *See McNabb,*298 F.3d at 1133.

The SEC did not abuse its discretion when it sustained the sanction, because it determined that Barkate failed to demonstrate mitigating factors for his conduct and the sanction was within the Sanction Guidelines for violation of NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040. *See id.*

Barkate’s remaining contentions are also without merit.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

AUGUSTUS FONTAINE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3855

[February 7, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Laura Johnson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502014CF012941A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Mara C. Herbert, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J. 

Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
U.S. Department of Labor news materials are accessible at http://www.dol.gov. The department’s Reasonable Accommodation 

Resource Center converts departmental information and documents into alternative formats, which include Braille and large print. For 

alternative format requests, please contact the department at (202) 693-7828 (voice) or (800) 877-8339 (federal relay).

 Media Advisory

U.S. Department of Labor | Oct. 13, 2016

US Labor Department announces meeting of advisory board

focused on nuclear weapons workers’ health, Oct. 17-19

Panel provides expert advice to serve industry workers better

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs will hold the 

second meeting of the Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health for the Energy Employees 

Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act, Oct. 17-19, 2016, in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The meetings are 

open to the public.

WHO: Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs

WHAT: Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health

WHERE: Comfort Inn Oak Ridge

433 Rutgers Ave.

Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

WHEN: Monday, Oct. 17, 2016: 3-5 p.m.

Tuesday, Oct. 18, 2016: 8:30 a.m.-6 p.m.

Wednesday, Oct. 19, 2016: 8:30 a.m.-2 p.m.

The advisory board will provide instructions on how to participate remotely by teleconference 

and/or Webex on its website no later than 72 hours before the meeting.

The meeting will include public comment sessions on Tuesday, Oct. 18, 2016, from 5 to 6 p.m., and on 

Wednesday, Oct. 19, 2016, from 1 to 2 p.m. To speak during public comments sessions, send a request 

EnergyAdvisoryBoard@dol.gov. Please identify the Advisory Board name and the meeting date of Oct. 17-19, 

2016. 

The 15-member board is comprised of five members from the scientific community, five from the medical 

community and five from the claimant community. The board meets at least twice per year. 

For more information on how to participate in the meeting, see the Federal Register notice. 

# # #

Media Contact:

Amanda McClure, 202-693-4672, mcclure.amanda.c@dol.gov

Release Number: 16-2031-NAT