alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Voice Control Systems, Inc.
Dallas, Texas

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-55845), pertaining to the Voice Control Systems, 
Inc. 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated January 28, 1999, 
relating to the financial statements of Voice Control Systems, Inc. appearing 
in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 
1998.



                                       /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP



Dallas, Texas
March 30, 1999
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20959 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DENNIS ALEXIA LANZA-GUILLEN, also known as Dennis Lanza, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-83-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Dennis Alexia Lanza-Guillen appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2) by being found in the United States without permission, following deportation. Lanza-Guillen challenges as unconstitutional § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury.No. 05-20959 -2- Lanza-Guillen’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Lanza-Guillen contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Lanza-Guillen properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. AFFIRMED.
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 8 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 1 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 8 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 2 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 8 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 3 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 8 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 4 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 8 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 5 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 8 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 6 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 8 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 7 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 8 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 8 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 8 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 9 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 8 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 10 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 8 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 11 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 8 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 12 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 8 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 13 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 8 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 14 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 8 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 15 of 15
**Exhibit 31.1**
**KOSS CORPORATION**
**CERTIFICATION***
I, Michael J. Koss, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Koss Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 17, 2004 /s/ Michael J. KossMichael J. KossChief Executive Officer, President andChief Financial Officer
* Since Michael J. Koss is both the principal executive officer and theprincipal financial officer of the registrant, only one certification isprovided.
Page 20 of 21
Exhibit 32.1


            Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer


The undersigned, the Chairman, President and Treasurer of Jaco Electronics, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the "Quarterly Report") accompanying
this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods presented as required by such report. The
foregoing certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities
as principal executive officer of the Company, my own due diligence and
representations made by certain other members of the Company's senior
management.

Date:  November 14, 2006

                          /s/ Joel H. Girsky
                          ------------------------
                          Joel H. Girsky
                          Chairman, President and Treasurer
                          (Principal Executive Officer)
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

E.H., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

MICHAEL E. DeBAKEY VA MEDICAL 

CENTER, Houston, TX, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0486

Issued: July 25, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On February 23, 2023 appellant filed a timely appeal from a January 25, 2023 merit 

decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate 

Boards assigned Docket No. 23-0486.

In a letter dated June 6, 2023, and received on June 21, 2023, appellant requested that the 

appeal be withdrawn.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that appellant’s request for the 

withdrawal of the appeal should be granted. Accordingly, 
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the withdrawal of the appeal 

is granted. The appeal docketed as No. 23-0486 is dismissed.

Issued: July 25, 2023

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 24 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 20 of 20
#### INSURANCE CO. v. CHANTOS

No. 126 PC.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 482.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 June 1975.
Case 1:06-cv-15004-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF JACOBSON STORES INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES AS
OF, AND FOR THE THIRTY-NINE WEEK PERIOD ENDED, OCTOBER 28, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ACCOMPANYING NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-28-2000
<CASH>                                             943
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                       351
<INVENTORY>                                    115,724
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               155,144
<PP&E>                                         190,080
<DEPRECIATION>                                 103,470
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 261,633
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,053
<BONDS>                                        121,716
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,975
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,452
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   261,633
<SALES>                                        305,648
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               305,648
<CGS>                                          203,216
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  203,216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,547
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,178)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,162)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,016)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,016)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.69)


</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

# USS Oklahoma Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Conway, E.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
# USS Oklahoma Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Flaherty, F.)

/ Published Sept. 10, 2020
WASHINGTON,
#### INSURANCE CO. v. KEITH

No. 28 PC.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 551.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 3 October 1972.
​
Exhibit 10.7
​
Current Named Executive Officer Salary and Bonus Arrangements for 2022
​
Base Salaries
​
The base salaries for 2022 for the following executive officers of Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. (the”Company”) and Great Southern Bank (the “Bank”) currently are as follows:
​
	Name and Title
	Base Salary

	​

	​
	​

	William V. Turner
	$200,000

	Chairman of the Board of

	the Company and the Bank

	​

	Joseph W. Turner
	$415,000

	President and Chief

	Executive Officer of the

	Company and the Bank

	​

	Rex A. Copeland
	$415,000

	Treasurer of the Company

	and Senior Vice President and

	Chief Financial Officer of the Bank

	​

	Kevin L. Baker
	$400,000

	Vice President and Chief

	Credit Officer of the Bank

	​

	John M. Bugh
	$400,000

	Vice President and Chief

	Lending Officer of the Bank

	​

	Mark Maples
	$160,000

	Vice President and Chief Operations

	Officer of the Bank

	​



​
Description of Bonus Arrangements
​
Pursuant to his employment agreement with the Company, Mr. Joseph W. Turner is entitled to an annual cash bonus equal to one percent of the Company's fiscal year pre-tax earnings.  Mr. William V. Turner is not entitled to an annual cash bonus pursuant to his employment agreement.  For certain executive officers whose bonus arrangements are not governed by contract, the Company has maintained an incentive bonus arrangement under which the officers may earn a cash bonus of up to 17.85% of the officer's annual base salary, with up to 9.35% based on the extent to which the Company achieves targeted earnings per share results and up to 8.50% based on the officer's individual performance.
Exhibit 99.1.a



Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Great Plains Energy Incorporated (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Bernard J. Beaudoin, as Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Andrea F. Bielsker, as Senior Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (Section symbol) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (Section symbol) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/Bernard J. Beaudoin                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Bernard J. Beaudoin
Chairman of the Board, President
    and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:  November 13, 2002                                                            
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|/s/Andrea F. Bielsker                                                               
|Andrea F. Bielsker                                                                  
|Senior Vice President - Finance, 
    Chief Financial Officer and 
    Treasurer    
|Date:  November 13, 2002                                                            

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to (Section symbol) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of (Section symbol) 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 24 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH Document 24 Filed 08/03/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America; v. Daniel RIVERA, Appellant.

No. 03-3097.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) Oct. 25, 2004.

Decided April 5, 2005.

*452Anne W. Chain, Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for United States of America.

William T. Lawson, III, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant.

Before SCIRICA, Chief Judge, FISHER and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

FISHER, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), appointed counsel for the Appellant Daniel Rivera originally filed a motion to withdraw from representation and an *Anders*brief, concluding, *inter alia,*that the sentence imposed on Appellant by the District Court was legal. The appeal was held C.A.V. pending *United States v. Booker,*— U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and Appellant’s counsel subsequently informed us by letter dated February 22, 2005, that Appellant now challenges his sentence under *Booker.*We interpret this letter to withdraw counsel’s earlier filed motion to withdraw from representation, and accordingly do not address whether the *Anders*brief previously submitted met the *Anders*standard.1

Having determined that the sentencing issues Appellant raises are best determined by the District Court in the first instance, we will vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with *Booker.*

1

. We note, however, some dissatisfaction with the fact that the *Anders*brief failed to even acknowledge the U.S.S.G § 3B1.2 issue, which wás clearly important at sentencing and which formed the basis for the informal brief submitted by Appellant after the *Anders*brief was filed.
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 1-5 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 1-5 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Steve MULLEN, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-50275.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 2005.*

Decided April 4, 2005.

Sean Lokey, USLA—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Steve Mullen, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Steve Mullen appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate his conviction pursuant to Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Rule 60 is an improper vehicle to challenge a criminal conviction. *See*Fed. R.Civ.P. 1. Moreover, Mullen fails to show extraordinary circumstances sufficient to excuse the untimely filing of his motion, regardless of how it is construed. *See Hamilton v. Newland,*374 F.3d 822, 825 (9th Cir.2004) (Rule 60(b)(6) is available only where extraordinary circumstances prevented a party from taking timely action to correct an erroneous judgment); *see*28 U.S.C. § 2255 (a 1-year period of limitation shall be applied to a § 2255 motion).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as,provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.