alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.1




 Exhibit 10.1 

Rambus Inc. 
 4453 North
First Street, Suite 100 
 San Jose, CA 94089 

March 11, 2022 
 Barington Companies Equity Partners, L.P.

 888 Seventh Avenue, 6th Floor 
 New York, NY 10019 

Attn: James A. Mitarotonda 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 

This letter amends the letter agreement, dated March 12, 2021 (the “Agreement”), between (a) Rambus Inc., a Delaware
corporation (“Company”), and (b) Barington Companies Equity Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Barington”), and each of the other related Persons (as defined below) set forth on the signature
pages to the Agreement (collectively with Barington, the “Barington Signatories”). Company and the Barington Signatories are collectively referred to as the “Parties.” 

It is agreed that the definition of Restricted Period in the Agreement is amended and restated as follows: 

“Restricted Period” means the period from the date of this Agreement until 11:59 p.m., Pacific time, on the first anniversary
of the date of the annual meeting of Company’s stockholders at which the Barington Designee’s term as a director of the Company expires. 

Except as expressly provided in this letter, the Agreement, as amended by this letter, remains in full force and effect. In the event of a
conflict between the terms of this letter and the Agreement, this letter will control. 
 [Signature page follows.] 











 
					
	Very truly yours,
	
	RAMBUS INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Chuck Kissner

		 	Name:	 	Charles Kissner
		 	Title:	 	Chairman of the Board of Directors


  

					
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED
	as of the date written above:
	
	BARINGTON COMPANIES EQUITY PARTNERS, L.P.
		
	By:	 	Barington Companies Investors, LLC
		 	its general partner
		
	By:	 	 /s/ James A. Mitarotonda

		 	Name:	 	James A. Mitarotonda
		 	Title:	 	Managing Member
	
	BARINGTON COMPANIES INVESTORS, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ James A. Mitarotonda

		 	Name:	 	James A. Mitarotonda
		 	Title:	 	Managing Member
	
	BARINGTON CAPITAL GROUP, L.P.
		
	By:	 	LNA Capital Corp.,
		 	its general partner
		
	By:	 	 /s/ James A. Mitarotonda

		 	Name:	 	James A. Mitarotonda
		 	Title:	 	President and CEO

 [Signature Page to Letter Agreement] 












					
	LNA CAPITAL CORP.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ James A. Mitarotonda

		 	Name:	 	James A. Mitarotonda
		 	Title:	 	President and CEO
	
	JAMES A. MITAROTONDA
	
	 /s/ James A. Mitarotonda


 [Signature Page to Letter Agreement]
Exhibit 10.62

AMENDMENT 2002-1  TO THE EARLE M. JORGENSEN COMPANY  EMPLOYEE CAPITAL ACCUMULATION PLAN

The Earle M. Jorgensen Employee Capital Accumulation Plan as amended and restated as of April 1, 2000 is hereby amended as follows:

1.    Effective
April 1, 2002 (except as otherwise provided), the following Appendix B is added to read as follows:

"APPENDIX B
GOOD FAITH EGTRRA COMPLIANCE





---



---





---



"APPENDIX C
MINIMUM DISTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS



---



---



---





***

Executed
this            day of                        , 2002.

|            |  | EARLE M. JORGENSEN COMPANY
|----------- |  | --------------------------
|            |  | By:                       
|Name:
Title |  |                           

---

QuickLinks
#### STATE v. RAY GIBSON SIMS, SR.

(Filed 4 May, 1966.)

Appeal by defendant from *McLaughlin, J.,*January Session 1966 of Cabarrus.

The bill of indictment charged that the defendant, on 19 May 1965, did feloniously steal $237.13 of the lawful money of the United States which belonged to the Tar Heel Oil Company, a corporation.

The State’s evidence tends to show that the defendant and a companion were in the filling station of the Tar Heel Oil Company in the afternoon of May 19, 1965, and that the money box was found missing shortly after they left. That same afternoon about 6 P.M. the money box of the Tar Heel Oil Company was found near the defendant’s parked Pontiac automobile which had been driven out on Rankin Road and left on a little dead-end road about 50 yards off the Rankin Road in the western edge of Kannapolis, in a wooded area. The box still contained $111 and the defendant when arrested had on his person $73.27, and his companion, who died before trial, had on his person $61.21.

The jury returned a verdict of guilty of the larceny of property *257of the value of under $200. From the judgment imposed the defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Goodwyn for the State.*

*B. W. Blackwelder for the defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The defendant’s assignments of error have been examined, and in our opinion they present no prejudicial error. In the trial below we find

No error.

Moore, J., not sitting.
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1

The X-Change Corporation
File No. 002-41703
Form 10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2012

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 -
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The X-Change Corporation (Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (Report),  I, R.  Wayne  Duke,  Chief
Executive and Acting Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350,  adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Dated: August 20, 2012                    By: /s/ R. Wayne Duke
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              R. Wayne Duke
                                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Acting Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to The  X-Change  Corporation  and will be  retained  by The  X-Change
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,496                  10,496
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                     46,742<F1>                  24,842<F1>
<COMMON>                                        84,230                  84,230
<OTHER-SE>                                   (141,468)<F2>               (119,568)<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,900                   9,068
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,900)                 (9,068)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)                   (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)                   (.08)
<FN>
<F1>Contributed Capital
<F2>Retained Earnings
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION





The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:



(1) The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  December 29, 2003



/s/  Kenneth W. Brimmer



Kenneth W. Brimmer,

Chief Executive Officer



Dated:  December 29, 2003



/s/  Mark Buckrey



Mark Buckrey,

Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           8,858
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  129,918
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,698
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,578
<PP&E>                                       2,821,575
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,536,810
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 416,393
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          542,204
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       799,187
<OTHER-SE>                                    (972,519)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   416,393
<SALES>                                        165,090
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               258,079
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               331,923
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,945
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (155,647)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (155,647)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (155,647)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.019)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.019)
        

</TABLE>
#### LINCOLN COUNTY v. SKINNER

No. 25 PC.

Case below: 19 N.C. App. 127.

. Petition for. writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 November 1973. • ■
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 208 (Friday, October 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 62130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21503]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1606-DR]


Texas; Amendment No. 6 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Texas (FEMA-1606-DR), dated September 24, 2005, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 14, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective October 14, 2005.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison,
Acting Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department 
of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 05-21503 Filed 10-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
New Jersey Headquarters
150 John F. Kennedy Parkway
Short Hills, NJ 07078






                          Independent Auditors' Report



The Partners
Kamine/Besicorp Carthage L.P.

We have audited the acompanying balance sheets of Kamine/Besicorp  Carthage L.P.
as of December  31, 1997 and 1996,  and the related  statements  of  operations,
partners'  equity  (deficiency),  and cash  flows  for each of the  years in the
three-year  period ended December 31, 1997.  These financial  statements are the
responsibility  of the general  partners.  Our  responsibility  is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We  conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  generally   accepted  auditing
standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the  accounting  principles  used and  significant  estimates  made by
management,  as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,  the financial  statements  referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects,  the financial position of Kamine/Besicorp  Carthage L.P.
as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year  period ended December 31, 1997 in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.



                                                       /s/KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP



February 24, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         163,861
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,516
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    134,641
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               407,550
<PP&E>                                       8,044,493
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,114,283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,342,662
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,081,948
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,184
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,056,941
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,342,662
<SALES>                                      1,525,382
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,282,390
<CGS>                                          924,670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,906,528
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                375,862
<INCOME-TAX>                                   140,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            235,862
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   235,862
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. WHITT

No. 743.

Case below: 2 N.C. App. 601.

Purported appeal from decision of North Carolina Court of Appeals dismissed 26 November 1968.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8389

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.
DARREN LEONARD IZARD, a/k/a Sld Dft 5:02CR37-4, a/k/a Twin, a/k/a Fat Boy,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:02-cr-00037-RLV-4)

Submitted: April 22, 2009 Decided: June 3, 2009

Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darren Leonard Izard, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Theodore Martens, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Darren Leonard Izard appeals the district court’s
order granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Izard , No. 5:02-cr-00037-RLV-4 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 15, 2008).
Further, as this court has recently issued its opinion in United

States v. Hood , 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2009), we deny Izard’s
motion to place this appeal in abeyance for Hood as moot. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 1:07-cv-03322-LBS Document 5 Filed 09/13/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03322-LBS Document 5 Filed 09/13/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to, and solely for purposes of, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), each of the undersigned hereby
certifies in the capacity and on the date indicated below that:

|/s/THOMAS E. REINCKENSThomas E. ReinckensChairman and Chief Executive Officer               | March 13, 2008
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------
|/s/MARGARET FEENEYMargaret FeeneyExecutive Vice President and
      Chief Financial Officer | March 13, 2008

---



QuickLinks
Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC     Document 7      Filed 03/09/2006     Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 11.1

CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

|                                                                               |  | 52 Weeks Ended |            | 52 Weeks Ended |   | 52 Weeks Ended |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -------------- | ---------- | -------------- | - | -------------- | -
|
|Earnings Per Share                                                             |  |                |            |                |   |                |  
|Net income applicable to common stockholders                                   |  | $              | 13,405,000 |                | $ | 8,271,000      |  
|                                                                               |  |                |            |                |   |                |  
|Basic Earnings Per Share                                                       |  |                |            |                |   |                |  
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                           |  |                | 15,726,000 |                |   | 15,849,000     |  
|                                                                               |  |                |            |                |   |                |  
|Basic earnings per share                                                       |  | $              | 0.85       |                | $ | 0.52           |  
|                                                                               |  |                |            |                |   |                |  
|Diluted Earnings Per Share                                                     |  |                |            |                |   |                |  
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                           |  |                | 15,726,000 |                |   | 15,849,000     |  
|Assuming conversion of outstanding stock options                               |  |                | 1,547,000  |                |   | 1,317,000      |  
|Less: assumed repurchase of common stock pursuant to the treasury stock method |  |                | (1,123,000 | )              |   | (948,000       | )
|                                                                               |  |                |            |                |   |                |  
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding as adjusted               |  |                | 16,150,000 |                |   | 16,218,000     |  
|                                                                               |  |                |            |                |   |                |  
|Diluted earnings per share                                                     |  | $              | 0.83       |                | $ | 0.51           |  
|                                                                               |  |                |            |                |   |                |  

---



QuickLinks
#### STATE v. MARTIN

No. 130 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 17.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 June 1976.