alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 11, 2015

No. 04-14-00814-CR

Jacob Randall SONGER,

Appellant

v.

The State of TexasAppellee/s

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-272-CR

Honorable Bill R. Palmer, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The State’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received and 

filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the State’s brief is this 

date GRANTED. Time is extended to July 10, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Nicole S. Bishop

Kendall County Attorney's Office

201 E San Antonio Ave Ste 306

Boerne, TX 78006-2013

Harold J. Danford

Danford Law Firm

813 Barnett Street

Kerrville, TX 78028
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Garrick L. WILSON, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-6991.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 4, 2005.

Decided April 7, 2005.

*513Garrick L. Wilson, Appellant pro se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Garrick L. Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000). In criminal cases, the defendant must file his notice of appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); *see United States v. Alvarez,*210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir.2000) (holding that § 3582 proceeding is criminal in nature and ten-day appeal period applies). With or without a motion, the district court may grant an extension of time to file of up to thirty days upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4); *United States v. Reyes,*759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.1985). We previously remanded this appeal to the district court to determine whether Wilson could demonstrate excusable neglect or good cause to excuse his untimely notice of appeal. After giving Wilson an opportunity to provide information supporting a finding of good cause or excusable neglect, to which Wilson did not respond, the district court denied an extension of the time to file a notice of appeal.

The district court entered its order denying the motion for reduction of sentence on April 15, 2004; the notice of appeal was filed on May 25, 2004. Because Wilson failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We also deny Wilson’s motion for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of The X-Change  Corporation on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2003,  as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
Stidham,  President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Charles Stidham
Charles Stidham
President and Chief Executive and Accounting Officer, Treasurer
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)


November 12, 2003


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
管轄門檻標準

行政命令 11246 號

供應與服務

基本保障

任意

員工人數

+ 高於 $10,000 

的合約

AAP 保障

50

或更多員工

一份達 $50,000 

+ 或更高的合約

營建

基本保障

任意

員工人數

+ 高於 $10,000 

的合約

16 項細則

任意

員工人數 +

高於 $10,000 

的合約

第 503 節

供應與服務

基本保障

任意

員工人數

+ 一份高於 $15,000

的合約

AAP 保障

50

或更多員工 + 一份達 $50,000 

或更高的合約

營建

基本保障

任意

員工人數

+ 一份高於 

$15,000 的合約

AAP 保障

50

或更多員工 + 一份達 $50,000 

或更高的合約

VEVRAA

供應與服務

基本保障

任意

員工人數

+ 一份達 $150,000

或更高的合約

AAP 保障

50

或更多員工 + 一份達 $150,000 

或更高的合約

營建

基本保障

任意

員工人數

+ 一份達 $150,000 

或更高的合約

AAP 保障

50

或更多員工 + 一份達 $150,000 

或更高的合約

請注意,第 503 節與 VEVRAA 的保障要求不適用於聯邦補助的營建承包商。此外,第 503 節與 VEVRAA 兩者皆受聯邦法管轄,該

法隨通貨膨脹調整某些與徵用相關的門檻金額數值。

請注意,本頁所提供為一般資訊。無法取代文中所述計劃的實際相關法律與法規。

如您對於管轄門檻標準有其他疑問,請與我們聯繫;請撥 1-800-397-6251,文字電話號碼:1-877-889-5627。

OFFICE OF FEDERAL CONTRACT

COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS

U.S. Department of Labor

2016 年 1 月
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                       5
<CIK>                                  0000320573
<NAME>    International Thoroughbred Breeders, Inc
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1
<CURRENCY>                            U S Dollars

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                              271,119
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       427,654
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3,234,558
<PP&E>                                            1,413,381
<DEPRECIATION>                                      387,404
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   58,166,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            21,027,298
<BONDS>                                          19,078,709
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                      36,248,375
<COMMON>                                         23,768,539
<OTHER-SE>                                      (26,146,062)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     58,166,739
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    446,588
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3,656,018
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3,771,401
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (6,980,831)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (6,980,831)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (6,980,831)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.78)




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000052617
<NAME> IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          74,849
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          14,362
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                13,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                29,796
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     25,134
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          56,266
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            56,730
<LOANS>                                        553,042
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,464
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,728,470
<DEPOSITS>                                     873,452
<SHORT-TERM>                                   582,840
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             82,636
<LONG-TERM>                                      9,716
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           47,963
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,965
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,898
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,728,470
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 30,389
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,498
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                27,463
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                61,350
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,028
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,552
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           30,798
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,674
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                113,116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,671
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      23,671
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,110
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .65<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64<F1>
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     .05<F2>
<LOANS-NON>                                      9,776
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,249
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,464
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,330
<RECOVERIES>                                       251
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,464
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,464
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,915
<FN>
<F1>Information not in 1,000 and earnings per share reported in basic and 
diluted.
<F2>Information not in 1,000
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6472** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. ROBERT ANTHONY WILLIAMS, a/k/a Black Mikey , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News
. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 4:07

- cr - 00144

- RAJ

- JEB

- 1 )

Submitted : July 13, 2015 Decided: July 20 , 2015

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Robert Anthony Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert Anthony Williams appeals the district court ’ s order granting his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 358 2 (c)(2)(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affi rm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams , No. 4:07

- cr - 00144

- RAJ

- JEB

- 1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 16, 2015) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### FOUST v. CITY OF GREENSBORO

No. 310 PC

Case below: 47 NC App 159

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 September 1980.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Elder, Fe lton and Senior Judge Willis

TERRENCE ANTONIO HOLT MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 0513-04-4 PER CURIAM JULY 13, 2004 FAIRFAX COUNTY SHER IFF’S DEPARTMENT

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Terrence Antonio Holt, on briefs), pro se. (David P. Bobzien, County Atto rney; Peter D. Andreoli, Jr., Deputy County Attorney, on br ief), for appellee.
Terrence Antonio Holt (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission denying his clai m for medical benefits and tempor ary total and partial disability benefits related to his hip replacement surgery, and finding that he fail ed to prove that his avascular necrosis was causally related to hi s compensable August 5, 1996 left knee injury. We have reviewed the record and the commissi on’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stat ed by the commission in its final opinion. See Holt v. Fairfax County Sheriff’s Office , VWC File No. 182-05-98 (Feb. 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because th e facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid th e decisional process.
See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the nine
months ended September 30, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000054291
<NAME> KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              47
<SECURITIES>                                        00
<RECEIVABLES>                                      383
<ALLOWANCES>                                         6
<INVENTORY>                                        434
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   969
<PP&E>                                           2,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                     969
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,313
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              663
<BONDS>                                            958
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               18
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                          61
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,313
<SALES>                                          1,645
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,645
<CGS>                                            1,357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,357
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   116
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    00
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  84
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      7
<INCOME-TAX>                                         3
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  7
<DISCONTINUED>                                      00
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     00
<CHANGES>                                           00
<NET-INCOME>                                         7
<EPS-BASIC>                                         00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       00


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO ALFREDO JESUS-JOSE, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-70321 

Agency No. A205-063-156 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 15, 2019**

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Francisco Alfredo Jesus-Jose, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions 

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his 

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for 

withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 18 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-70321 

Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008), except to the extent that 

deference is owed to the BIA’s interpretation of the governing statutes and 

regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004). We review 

for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 

1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not err in finding that Jesus-Jose failed to establish 

membership in a cognizable social group. See Reyes v. Lynch, 842 F.3d 1125, 

1131 (9th Cir. 2016) (in order to demonstrate membership in a particular group, 

“[t]he applicant must ‘establish that the group is (1) composed of members who 

share a common immutable characteristic, (2) defined with particularity, and (3) 

socially distinct within the society in question’” (quoting Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 

I. & N. Dec. 227, 237 (BIA 2014))). 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Jesus-Jose 

otherwise failed to demonstrate a nexus between the harm he fears in Guatemala 

and a protected ground. See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) 

(an applicant’s “desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft 

or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”). 

Thus, Jesus-Jose’s withholding of removal claim fails. 

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Jesus-Jose failed to show it is more likely than not that he would be tortured by or 
3 16-70321 

with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Guatemala. See 

Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1067-68 (9th Cir. 2009) (no likelihood of 

torture established).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# In the Missouri Court of Appeals

Eastern District

SEPTEMBER 16, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED99767 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V BRANDON D. JACKSON,

APP

2. ED100209 FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT ET AL, APP V CITY OF STL, RES

3. ED100314 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MICHAEL GRIMES, APP

4. ED100608 JASON W. O'BARR, APP V. DAVID COBBLE, JR., RES

5. ED100725 COLLECTOR OF REVENUE, RES V. PARCELS OF LAND,

DFT

6. ED100808 SAUNDRA HENNINGS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

7. ED100957 RONALD HERBERT, RES V SECOND INJURY FUND, APP

8. ED101128 ADAM L. DERBY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

WITHDRAWALS

1. ED97810 PATRICK BLANKS, RES V FLUOR CORPORATION, APP
#### PEASELEY v. COKE CO.

No. 89.

Reported: 282 N.C. 585.

Petition by Coke Company to rehear denied 1 June 1973.
# Soldier Accounted For From Korean War (Thompson, D.)

/ Published Dec. 1, 2022
WASHINGTON ,
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of ORS Automation, Inc. ( the "Company"),
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ( the "Report"). I, James
R. Solakian, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the
Company, certify, that pursuant to 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of section
     13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Act of 1934, and
2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material aspects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.

/s/ James R. Solakian
CEO and CFO
March 27, 2003
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00396

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF A.S., A C HILD §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 393rd District

Court

of Denton County ( 22

- 8031

- 367 )

Fe bruary 1, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

Justice Dabney Bassel
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                 Exhibit 11.1


                              EARNINGS PER SHARE
                              PRIMARY COMPUTATION
              ($ in millions except share and per share amounts)


<CAPTION> 
                                              Six Months Ended
                                                December 31,
                                             1995           1994
--------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                          <C>            <C>
Basis for computation of earnings per 
  common and common equivalent shares:
    Earnings from continuing operations      $ 74.0         $ 65.8
    Deduct dividends on 4 Percent 
      cumulative preferred stock                (.2)           (.2)
                                             --------       --------
    Earnings from continuing operations
      available to common shareholders         73.8           65.6
    Discontinued operations                    22.5            7.9
                                             --------       --------
   Available for common shareholders         $ 96.3         $ 73.5
                                             ========       ========



Number of shares:
  Weighted average shares outstanding        76,098,488     76,757,943
  Shares issuable upon exercise of 
    stock options, net of shares assumed
    to be repurchased                         1,062,758        645,205
                                             ----------     ----------
                                             77,161,246     77,403,148
                                             ==========     ==========




Earnings per common share:
  Continuing operations                        $ .96          $.85
  Discontinued operations                        .29           .10
                                               -----         -----
  Net earnings                                 $1.25          $.95
                                               ======        ======


</TABLE>