alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.19

[Oxboro Letterhead]

February 10,
1999

Matthew
E. Bellin
8270 Havelock Court
Apple Valley, Minnesota 55337

Dear
Matthew:

I
am pleased to confirm this offer of employment at Oxboro-Medical International Incorporated. A summary of your offer is:

Position;

The
position being offered is President/Chief Operating Officer. This position will report to the Oxboro Board of Directors.

Compensation:

Your
salary will be $3,846.16 per pay period, $100,000 annualized. Your salary will be reviewed one year after your start date.

You
will be eligible for a annual performance bonus of 20 percent of your base pay based on mutually acceptable objectives.

Benefits:

After
30 days of full time employment, certain benefits will be available to you. I have included information for your review. You will receive 3 weeks paid vacation per year.

Employee
Non-Compete and Confidentiality Agreement;

I
have enclosed a copy of the non-compete and confidentiality agreement. Signing this agreement is a condition of your employment with the Company. We encourage you to review the agreement
or obtain a legal opinion of you so desire.

You
will be required to represent and warrant that as of the date when you commence the employment, you are not a party to any agreement which would restrict or prohibit you from undertaking or
performing any of the duties of your employment at Oxboro. Such provision will also require you to warrant that, by virtue of entering into your in non-compete and confidentiality
agreement, you will not be in breach of any agreement binding upon you. If you to the best of your knowledge, will not be able to make these representations and warranties to the company, you should
not execute this offer letter.

Stock
Options;

During
your employment, you will receive options to purchase 100,000 shares of Oxboro common stock over a five year vesting. The price for the options will be $1.50 per share The vesting schedule is
as follows;

20,000
shares after 12 full months of employment
                        20,000 shares after 24 full months of employment
                        20,000 shares after 36 full months of employment
                        20,000 shares after 48 full months of employment
                        20,000 shares after 60 full months of employment

Start
Date

Your
start date will be February 15, 1999

Please
acknowledge your acceptance to this offer by signing below and returning it to me. On behalf of the Board of Directors we are looking forward to having you join our company and working with
you. I believe

it will be a mutually rewarding relationship. If you have any questions you can telephone me at (612) 753-0594.

Sincerely
yours,

Robert
S. Garin
Chairman of the Board

|Enclosures: |  | Benefits information
Employee Non-Compete/Confidentiality Agreement
|----------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------

I
agree to accept this offer of employment as stated and understand that this offer is for employment at will.

|/s/ Matthew E. BellinMatthew E. Bellin |  | February 10, 1999Date
|-------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
# C_2007311EN.01000401.xml

| 21.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4908 — STV Fund/Smith/@Balance)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 311/03)

On 17 December 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4908. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4908. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1440 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1440

 To discontinue a Federal program that authorizes State and local law 
 enforcement officers to investigate, apprehend, and detain aliens in 
     accordance with a written agreement with the Director of U.S. 
  Immigration and Customs Enforcement and to clarify that immigration 
      enforcement is solely a function of the Federal Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 14, 2019

   Mr. Booker (for himself, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Schatz, Mr. 
Sanders, and Ms. Harris) introduced the following bill; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To discontinue a Federal program that authorizes State and local law 
 enforcement officers to investigate, apprehend, and detain aliens in 
     accordance with a written agreement with the Director of U.S. 
  Immigration and Customs Enforcement and to clarify that immigration 
      enforcement is solely a function of the Federal Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting the Rights Of Towns 
against federal Enforcement contrary to Constitutional Tenets for 
Immigration Act'' or the ``PROTECT Immigration Act''.

SEC. 2. RESCISSION OF STATE AND LOCAL IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT 
              AUTHORITY.

    Section 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1357(g)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(g) Except as provided in sections 103(a)(10) and 274(c) of this 
Act and in section 439 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty 
Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1252c), the authority to inquire about or verify 
immigration or citizenship status and to investigate, apprehend, 
arrest, or detain an individual for a violation of this Act or any 
regulation authorized by this Act is restricted to immigration officers 
and authorized employees of the Department of Homeland Security and 
subject to limits set forth in other provisions of law.''.
                                 <all>
```
OFCCP 保护你在工作中免遭歧视

1. 何谓就业歧视? 

就业歧视一般指雇主仅因个人种族、肤色、宗教、

性别、性取向、性别认同、国籍、残疾或受保护退

役军人身份而差别对待求职者或员工。雇主因讨

论、披露或询问薪酬而处分、解雇或差别对待员工

或求职者,也视为歧视。就业歧视会针对个人或群

体。

2. 我有哪些权利?

你有权在无歧视的环境中工作。不得因个人种族、

肤色、宗教、性别、性取向、性别认同、国籍、残

疾或受保护退役军人身份而遭受拒绝就业、骚扰、

降职、解雇、减薪或差别对待。你也有权讨论、披

露或询问个人工资、同事工资以及求职者的工资或

报酬。

3. OFCCP 是否施行反就业歧视法?

是的。OFCCP 施行第 11246 号行政命令、《康复

法》(Rehabilitation Act) 第 503 条和《帮助越

南退役军人重新就业法》(Vietnam Era Veterans’ 

Readjustment Assistance Act)。总的来说,这些

法律规定,如果与联邦政府有业务往来的公司对受

上述法律保护的员工和求职者有歧视行为,则视为

违法。还禁止歧视员工或求职者询问、讨论或披露

其工资。

4. OFCCP 的保护对象有哪些? 

OFCCP 保护与联邦政府有业务往来的企业的雇员和

求职者的权利,包括银行、IT 公司、肉类包装厂、

零售店、制造厂、会计师事务所和建筑公司等机构

的雇员。

 

5. 如何知道我是否受到歧视?

歧视有多种形式,可能并不是有意违法。一般来

说,法律禁止的歧视有两种类型:

差别待遇,雇主因个人种族、肤色、宗教、性别、

性取向、性别认同、国籍、残疾或受保护退役军人

身份而不合理地对待求职者或员工,即为差别待

遇。

差别影响,雇主的政策或做法看似公平且平等推

行,但对特定性别、种族或族裔群体的成员、残疾

人或其他受保护群体有负面影响,即为差别影响。

6. 非法就业歧视有哪些示例?

就业歧视示例包括:

• 将所有西班牙裔员工分配到特定工作区;

• 相同工作女性工资低于男性;

• 取笑有口音的员工,且并非偶尔为之;

• 仅根据性别或种族晋升员工;

• 要求接受与工作无关但可以过滤掉特定

群体求职者的测试,如数学测验或负重规

定;

• 拒绝产后复职的女性员工休带薪病假,但

允许膝盖手术后复职的员工休带薪病假;

以及

• 解雇与同事讨论薪酬的员工。

7. 如果我认为雇主歧视我,该怎么办?

如果你认为由于种族、肤色、宗教、性别、性

取向、性别认同、国籍、残疾、受保护退役军

人身份,或者因询问、讨论或披露薪酬等原因

在就业或求职时受到歧视,可以向 OFCCP 投

诉。即使不确定雇主是否是联邦承包商或分包

商,也可提出投诉。 

8. 如何向 OFCCP 投诉?

可以通过以下方式提出歧视投诉:

• 在 OFCCP 的网站在线填写并提交表格;

• 亲自到 OFCCP 办公室填写表格;或

• 通过邮寄、邮件或传真的方式将填写完整的表格

交至歧视发生地的 OFCCP 地区办公室。

可访问 http://www.dol.gov/ofccp/regs/compliance/pdf/

pdfstart.htm 下载表格,或在任一 OFCCP 办公室领取

纸质表格。如需寻找最近的办公室,请访问 

http://www.dol.gov/ofccp/contacts/ofnation2.htm,

查看 OFCCP 办公室清单。 

务必在填写完整的投诉表格上签名。如未签名,OFCCP 

仍会受理您的投诉,但调查员会在后续面谈中要求您

在表格中签名。指控歧视种族、肤色、宗教、性别、

性取向、性别认同、国籍的投诉需在指控后的 180 天

内呈交,出于正当理由延迟呈交的情况除外。180 天

的时限同样适用于针对讨论、公开或询问薪酬等歧视的

投诉。指控歧视受保护军人身份或残疾的诉状需在指控

后的 300 天内呈交,出于正当理由延迟呈交的情况除

外。

了解您的权利

工作场所权利

200 CONSTITUTION AVENUE NW | WASHINGTON, DC 20210 | 电话:1-800-397-6251 | TTY:1-877-889-5627 | www.dol.gov/ofccp
9. 雇主可以因为我的投诉而解雇、降职或差别

对待我吗?

不可以。雇主因您投诉或参与调查而报复是违法

的。OFCCP 的规定能保护您免受骚扰、恐吓、威胁、

胁迫或报复,从而维护您的权利。

10.能否同时向 OFCCP 及美国公平就业机会委员

会 / Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 

(EEOC) 投诉?

可以。如果您同时向 OFCCP 及 EEOC 投诉,将由合适

的机构展开调查。在某些情况下,OFCCP 及 EEOC 可

能会决定联手进行调查。 

OFCCP 通常会保留针对联邦承包商的惯例歧视部分雇

员或求职者的投诉。OFCCP 通常会保留针对联邦承包

商的关于性取向或性别认同、残疾或受保护退役军人

身份歧视的投诉。一般来说,OFCCP 会保留针对联邦

承包商歧视询问、讨论或披露工资的员工的投诉。

11.如果发现我是就业歧视受害者会怎样?

您将有权获得补偿,被分配在应有的职位(如果没有

发生歧视,已经就职的职位)。您将有权被雇用、升

职、复职或调岗。您也会有权获取欠薪、预支工资、

加薪或上述补偿中的多项。此外,如果 OFCCP 发现联

邦承包商或分包商违反其法律规定,OFCCP 会考虑将

公司从未来的联邦合同中撤销或除名,或撤销公司的

现有合同或合同修改版。

如需其它信息,请联系

the u.s. department of labor

Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs

200 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20210

1-800-397-6251

TTY: 1-877-889-5627

www.dol.gov/ofccp

请注意,本情况说明书仅提供基本信息,无法取代与此处所述项目相关

的现行法律和法规。

200 CONSTITUTION AVENUE NW | WASHINGTON, DC 20210 | 电话:1-800-397-6251 | TTY:1-877-889-5627 | www.dol.gov/ofccp 2016 年 9 月修订
U.S.DepartmentofLabor Employment Standards Ad~nistraUon 

Olfice of Workers' Compensation Programs 

Division of Longshore and 

FEB - 2 1998 

H1:1rbOrWorkers' Compensation 

Washington, D.C. 2021 D 

File Number: 

Notice No .. 85 

NOTICE TO INSURANCE CARRIERS AND SELF-INSURED EMPLOYERS UNDER THE 

LONGSHORE AND HARBOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION ACT 

SUBJECT: Revision of Forms LS-18, LS-206, LS-207, LS-222, LS-265 

& LS-266 

Enclosed are copies of the recently revised Forms LS-18, LS-206, 

LS-207, LS-222, LS-265 and LS-266 which are used under the 

Longshore and Harbor Workers• Compensation Act and its 

extensions, the Defense Base Act, the Nonappropriated Fund 

Instrumentalities Act and the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act. 

These forms have been revised to comply with the new display 

requirements for collections of information required by 5 CFR 

1320.8{b). This regulation provides, in part, that collections 

of information must display the 0MB number; indicate the reason 

for the information collection and its use; advise whether the 

response is mandatory, required to obtain a benefit or voluntary; 

and to advise that persons are not required to respond to the 

collection of information unless it displays a currently valid 

0MB control number. The reporting requirements of the forms and 

their general formats have not been changed. 

Prior versions of these forms are now obsolete and should no 

longer be used. If you decide to print and stock these forms, 

the printed copies must conform in every respect to the enclosed 

originals. You may, however, purchase supplies from any of the 

following printing companies: 

Uniform Printing·and Supply, Inc. 

30 Montgomery Street 

Jersey City, NJ 07302 

Paragon Graphics 

8131 West 10th Street 

Indianapolis, IN 46214 

this Office at Area Code (202} 219-8721 if you have 

earning the use or printing of these forms. 

IM 0 

Divisi n of 

Longshore and Harbor 

Workers' Compensation 

Working for America's Wbrkforre
Case 1:07-cr-00352-PAC Document 2 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
Essex County Court of Common Pleas.

#### STATE v. JOHN T. COOPER.

Decided June 29, 1932.

Eor the state, *Leon W. Kapp*and *Harold*Fisher, special assistant prosecutors.

Eor the defendant, *Thomas Brunetto.*

Elannagan, J.

The complaint is definite and specific charging that defendant did “operate a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor” on Grove and Walnut streets, Montclair. The complaint is endorsed “guilty.” The “summary of testimony,” signed and returned by the recorder, in its concluding paragraph says: “I thereupon found the defendant guilty of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.”

While this falls short of what a conviction and return should contain as indicated in *State*v. Whitaker, 7 *N. J. Mis. R.*395; 146 *Atl. Rep.*42, it is definite and clear and does not leave open to question that defendant was convicted of the charge laid in the complaint. It therefore is at least equal to the minimum requirements as indicated in that case where it is said “if a complaint is definite and specific, it will suffice if the judgment finds the defendant 'guilty as charged/ ”

The motion to discharge defendant is therefore denied.

I have no difficulty in reaching the conclusion on the evidence that the defendant is guilty as charged.
Exhibit 21
Petroleum Helicopters Inc.
Subsidiaries of the Registrant at April 30, 1999

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                          PLACE OF                % OF VOTING
COMPANY                                   INCORPORATION           STOCK OWNED
-------                                   -------------          -------------
<S>                                      <C>                     <C>

International Helicopter Transport, Inc.  Louisiana              100%

Evangeline Airmotive, Inc.                Louisiana              100%

Petroleum Helicopters De Bolivia, Inc.    Delaware               100%

Heli-Tours, Inc.                          Louisiana              100%

Acadian Composites, Inc.                  Louisiana              100%

Transnational Transit LTD                 Trinidad               20%

Asia Aircraft Overseas Philippines        Philippines            30%

Siam Aerospace Technology                 Thailand               48%

Clintondale Aviation                      New York               50%

Air Evac Services, Inc.                   Louisiana             100%

PHI Aeromedical Services, Inc.            Louisiana             100%

Petroleum Helicopters International,Inc   Louisiana             100%


</TABLE>
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 11094 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Christopher Williams,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:07

- CR

- 54

- 1

Before **King, Higginson,**  and **Willett,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
Christopher Williams, federal prisoner # 35731

- 177, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel defense counsel to surrender his case file regarding his conviction, after a jury trial , of possessing a controlled substance, possessing wi th the intent to distribute more than five

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 1, 2022
Lyle W. C ayce Clerk Case: 21-11094 Document: 00516456591 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/01/2022No. 21

- 11094

2 grams of crack cocaine , unlawfully possessing a firearm in connection with a drug

- trafficking offense, and being a felon in possession of a firearm

. Williams stated that he sought his case files in order to prepare a motion to
vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

We must first examine the basis of our jurisdiction to hear this appeal

. See Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). We may only exercise jurisdiction over final orders and certain interloc utory orders. See 28 U.S.C. § § 1291 , 1292 ; Dardar v. Lafourche Realty Co. , 849 F.2d 955, 957 (5th Cir. 1988)

. Discovery orders generally are not appealable. Goodman v. Harris

C

n ty. , 443 F.3d 464, 467 (5th Cir. 2006). Here, because t he district court’s order denying Williams’s motion to compel is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, we lack jurisdiction to consider
his appeal from that order. See Dardar , 849 F.2d at 957.

Williams’s pro se brief su ggests that he seeks authorization to file a successive § 225 5 motion . In order to do so, Williams must first show that his proposed claim s w ere not raised in a prior § 2255 motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1); § 2255(h). He also must make a prima facie showing that the
claim s rely on either “newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found [him] guilty of the offense” or “a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.” § 2255(h)(1)

- (2) ; see § 2244(b) (3)(C) . Williams has not made such a showing.
Accordingly, **IT IS ORDERED** that the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. Williams’s motion for authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion and
his motion for appoint ment of counsel are **DENIED**

. Case: 21-11094 Document: 00516456591 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/01/2022
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00225-CV

In re Patrick Earl Tarkington

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Edward Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith

Filed: May 5, 2022
# Airman Accounted for from WWII (Hall, F.)

/ Published Nov. 27, 2023
WASHINGTON, 
The Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) announced today that U.S. Army Air Force Staff Sgt. Franklin P. Hall, 21, of Leesburg, Florida, killed during World War II, was accounted for July 13, 2023.

In January 1944, Hall was assigned to the 66th Bombardment Squadron, 44th Bombardment Group (Heavy) in the European Theater. On Jan. 21, Hall, a left waist gunner on board a B-24D Liberator *Queen Marlene*, was killed in action when his plane was attacked by German air forces near Équennes-Éramecourt, France. German forces quickly found the crash site and recovered nine sets of remains, which were then interred them in the French cemetery at Poix-de-Picardie. Hall’s remains were not accounted for after the war.

Beginning in 1945, the American Graves Registration Command (AGRC), the organization that searched for and recovered fallen American personnel in the European Theater, searched the area around Équennes-Éramecourt. None of the investigations uncovered any leads regarding the disposition of Hall’s remains. He was declared non-recoverable on March 01, 1951.

DPAA historians have been conducting on-going research into Soldiers missing from combat around Équennes-Éramecourt and found that X-391 St. Andre (X-391) and X-393 St. Andre (X-393), buried in Normandy American Cemetery, an American Battle Monuments Commission site, could be associated with Hall. X-391 and X-393 were disinterred in April 2018 and transferred to the DPAA Laboratory for analysis where it was later determined the remains of X-393 belonged to Hall.

To identify Hall’s remains, scientists from DPAA used anthropological analysis. Additionally, scientists from the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System used mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and Y-chromosome DNA  (Y-STR) analysis.

Hall’s name is recorded on the Tablets of the Missing at Ardennes American Cemetery, France, along with others still missing from WWII. A rosette will be placed next to his name to indicate he has been accounted for.

Hall will be buried in Leesburg, Florida, on a date to be determined.

For family and funeral information, contact the Army Casualty Office at (800) 892-2490.

For additional information on the Defense Department’s mission to account for Americans who went missing while serving our country, visit the DPAA website at www.dpaa.mil or find us on social media at www.facebook.com/dodpaa or https://www.linkedin.com/company/defense-pow-mia-accounting-agency.

Hall’s personnel profile can be viewed at  https://dpaa-mil.sites.crmforce.mil/dpaaProfile?id=a0Jt0000000cc5REAQ.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JOSEPH EMANUEL THOMPSON

No. 329A82

(Filed 3 November 1982)

Appeal of right pursuant to G.S. 7A-30Í2) from a decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 57 N.C. App. 142, 291 S.E. 2d 266 (1982), awarding the defendant a new trial.

*Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General, by William R. Shenton and Robert L. Hillman, Assistant Attorneys General, for the State.*

*Adam Stein, Appellate Defender, by Ann B. Petersen, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellee.*

PER CURIAM.

The majority of the panel of the Court of Appeals which decided this case correctly concluded that the trial court expressed an opinion on the evidence and thereby violated G.S. 15A-1232. Consequently, the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals awarding the defendant a new trial must be affirmed. It is unnecessary for this Court to consider the other matters discussed in the majority opinion in the Court of Appeals, as they are not likely to arise again during a retrial of this case.

Affirmed.