alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000052617
<NAME> IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          46,423
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          18,318
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                12,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                42,772
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      5,462
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          40,961
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            41,300
<LOANS>                                        570,873
<ALLOWANCE>                                     10,213
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,630,465
<DEPOSITS>                                     949,316
<SHORT-TERM>                                   399,375
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             77,472
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,719
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           48,017
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,965
<OTHER-SE>                                     123,601
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,630,465
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 11,658
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,078
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                18,993
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                31,729
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,661
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,803
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           17,926
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,201
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 55,111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,262
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      16,262
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,972
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41<F1>
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     .05<F2>
<LOANS-NON>                                     12,339
<LOANS-PAST>                                       335
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,888
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      515
<RECOVERIES>                                        76
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               10,213
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            10,213
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,352
<FN>
<F1>Information no in 1,000 and earnings per shares reportd
in basic and diluted.
<F2>Information no in 1,000
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
The Cerplex Group, Inc.:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements (No.
333-60027, 333-87643) on Form S-8, of The Cerplex Group, Inc. (formerly known as
Aurora Electronics, Inc.) of our report dated December 20, 1999, relating to the
consolidated  balance sheets of The Cerplex Group,  Inc. and  subsidiaries as of
September 25, 1999 and September 30, 1998, the related  consolidated  statements
of operations, stockholders' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended and
related  schedule,  which report appears in the September 25, 1999 annual report
on Form 10-K of The Cerplex Group, Inc.

Our report dated  December  20, 1999,  contains an  explanatory  paragraph  that
states that the Company has suffered  recurring losses from operations,  has net
stockholders' and working capital  deficiencies,  is in default on substantially
all of its  debt  obligations  and does  not  have  the  necessary  funds to pay
substantially  all of its debt obligations  which are in default or which mature
in fiscal year 2000, which raise  substantial  doubt about the Company's ability
to  continue as a going  concern.  The  consolidated  financial  statements  and
financial  statement  schedule do not include any adjustments  that might result
from the outcome of this uncertainty.


                                                                    KPMG LLP


Orange County, California
January 10, 2000
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Jaclyn,  Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned  each hereby  certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and (2) the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 14, 2007                     /s/ Robert Chestnov
                                             --------------------
                                             Robert Chestnov, President
                                             (Chief Executive Officer)

Dated: November 14, 2007                     /s/ Anthony Christon
                                             --------------------
                                             Anthony Christon, Chief Financial
                                             Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Jaclyn,  Inc. and will be retained by Jaclyn,  Inc. and forwarded to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       24
#### STATE v. FAIR

No. 151 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 147.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 17 June 1976.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                                         29,777
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  77,004
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,079
<INVENTORY>                                    19,909
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               138,166
<PP&E>                                         485,796
<DEPRECIATION>                                 153,339
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 575,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          111,996
<BONDS>                                        174,818
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          4,250
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5,792
<OTHER-SE>                                     147,148
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   575,645
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               486,099
<CGS>                                          280,367
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  431,635
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             12,660
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                15,873
<INCOME-TAX>                                   5,577
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            10,296
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   10,296
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.31



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-41251

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEONEL BALDERAS-ALVARADO, 

also known as Ricardo Silva,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:00-CR-45-ALL

--------------------

June 15, 2001

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Leonel

Balderas-Alvarado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Balderas-Alvarado has filed a response to counsel’s motion.

Our independent review of the brief, the record, and the

response of Balderas-Alvarado discloses one possible nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. His offense level and sentence were increased

for his having been deported after a prior aggravated-felony

conviction that was not alleged in his indictment. An argument
No. 00-41251

-2-

that the prior conviction should have been alleged in the

indictment is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224 (1998). However, the continuing validity of

Almendarez-Torres has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 489 (2000)(finding it “arguable that

Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided”). Counsel could have

raised the issue on appeal in order to preserve it for Supreme

Court review in light of Apprendi.

In light of this possible nonfrivolous issue for appeal, we

deny counsel’s motion to withdraw. By our denying the motion to

withdraw, Balderas-Alvarado preserves the Almendarez-Torres issue

for further review. We pretermit further briefing, however, and

AFFIRM the judgment of the district court because Apprendi did

not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 490;

see also United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir.

2000)(noting that the Supreme Court in Apprendi expressly

declined to overrule Almendarez-Torres), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct.

1214 (2001). This court must follow the precedent set in

Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself

determines to overrule it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal

quotation and citation omitted). 

Finally, the record has not been adequately developed for us

to consider Balderas-Alvarado’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel

arguments on direct appeal. See United States v. Haese, 162 F.3d

359, 363 (5th Cir. 1998). 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

DENIED, and the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### STATE v. BROWN

No. 178 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 409.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 14 July 1976.
<TABLE>
                                                           Exhibit 12

                    KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
          Computations of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                        (Dollars in Thousands)
<CAPTION>

                                     Unaudited
                                      Twelve
                                      Months    
                                      Ended                                                   
                                     March 31,                    Year Ended December 31,                 
                                       1999        1998        1997        1996        1995        1994   
<S>                                  <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C> 
Net Income. . . . . . . . . . . . .  $ 94,255    $103,765    $ 52,128    $ 96,274    $110,873    $104,526 
Taxes on Income . . . . . . . . . .    42,619      44,971      17,408      36,258      51,787      55,349 
     Net Income Plus Taxes. . . . .   136,874     148,736      69,536     132,532     162,660     159,875 
                                             
Fixed Charges:                               
  Interest on Long-Term Debt. . . .    45,954      45,990      46,062      46,304      47,073      47,827 
  Interest on Other Indebtedness. .     3,307       3,368       4,388      11,758       5,190       5,183 
  Interest on Corporate-owned                
    Life Insurance Borrowings . . .    31,515      32,368      31,253      27,636      25,357      20,990 
  Interest Applicable to Rentals. .    24,961      25,106      25,143      25,539      25,375      25,096 
      Total Fixed Charges . . . . .   105,737     106,832     106,846     111,237     102,995      99,096 
                                              
Earnings (1). . . . . . . . . . . .  $242,611    $255,568    $176,382    $243,769    $265,655    $258,971 
                                              
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.      2.29        2.39        1.65        2.19        2.58        2.61 



                                

     (1)  Earnings are deemed to consist of net income to which has been added income taxes (including net 
     deferred investment  tax  credit)  and  fixed  charges.  Fixed charges consist of all interest on
     indebtedness, amortization of debt discount and expense, and the portion of rental expense which
     represents an interest factor.
</TABLE>
#### CARRADINO PERGOLA AND ALFRED DONNARUMMA, PLAINTIFFS, v. BERNARD LOBERMANN AND MARY T. LOBERMANN, DEFENDANTS.

Decided December 10, 1931.

Before Justices Campbell, Lloyd and Bodine.

For the motion, *Philip Sherman.*

*Contra, A. Michael Lepore.*

Memorandum.

An examination and consideration of the proofs before us in this matter brings us to the conclusion that the judgments should not be permitted to be opened.

The application is therefore denied, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                             5
<LEGEND>
      This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from
      TimeOne,  Inc. December 31, 1999 financial  statements and is qualified in
      its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                  0000350133
<NAME>                                 TimeOne, Inc.
<CURRENCY>                             US

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                        1.00

<CASH>                                          421,046
<SECURITIES>                                    1,604,725
<RECEIVABLES>                                   389
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                2,041,904
<PP&E>                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  2,100,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           105,840
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        826
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,994,328
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    2,100,994
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                548,667
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   320,175
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,186
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              9,529
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 198,777
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,933
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             196,844
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    196,844
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .02



</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (5.61 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Approval of Compromise of Third

Person Cause of Action U.S. Department of Labor

Claimant OWCP Case No. V.

Employer

Insurance Carrier

The above named employer and its insurance carrier, having liability for disability/death benefits under the

Act in the above captioned case, and being advised that the claimant or representative above named has

compromised the cause of action against

third person(s), which arose out of the injury/death on

in the case, in the gross amount of $ , and the net amount of $

dated herewith approves said compromise on the date shown below, pursuant to the

Employer 

By 

Title Date

Insurance Carrier 

By 

Title Date

Claimant 

By 

Title Date

Filed on

Da District Director te

This form, or a signed statement in lieu thereof containing language of the same intent, must be filed in the

office of the District Director having jurisdiction of the subject injury or death within 30 days after

compromise is made in order to insure that the employer shall be liable for compensation as provided

in section 33.

Form LS-33

Rev. Jan. 2003

2IILFHRI:RUNHUV
&RPSHQVDWLRQ3URJUDPV



provisions of Sec. 33(g) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. 933(g).

District 

in the Office of the District Director for the Compensation
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Jaclyn, Inc.
(the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report"), the
undersigned each hereby certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 16, 2005                    /s/ ROBERT CHESTNOV
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Robert Chestnov, President
                                       (Chief Executive Officer)


Dated: May 16, 2005                    /s/ ANTHONY CHRISTON
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Anthony Christon, Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Jaclyn, Inc. and will be retained by Jaclyn, Inc. and forwarded to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG Document 1 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG Document 1 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 2 of 2
# U.S. Soldier MIA From Korean War Identified (Moore)

/ Published June 1, 2011

The Department of Defense POW/Missing Personnel Office announced today that theremains of a U.S. serviceman, missing in action from the Korean War, have been identified andreturned to his family for burial with full military honors.

Army Cpl. Harold B. Moore, 19, of Wood County, W.Va., will be buried June 2 atArlington National Cemetery near Washington, D.C. On Nov. 1, 1950, Moore’s unit, the 8thCavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division, occupied a defensive position along the Kuryong River,near Unsan, North Korea. Chinese units attacked the area and forced a withdrawal. Almost 600men, including Moore, were reported missing or killed in action following the battle.

In 2001, a joint U.S-Democratic People’s Republic of Korea team, led by the JointPOW/MIA Accounting Command (JPAC), excavated a common grave discovered in UnsanCounty, south of the area known as “Camel’s Head.” The team recovered remains of twoindividuals as well as military equipment.

Analysts from DPMO and JPAC developed case leads with information spanning morethan 58 years. They evaluated the circumstances surrounding the soldier’s death and researchedwartime documentation on the movements of U.S. and enemy forces on the battlefield.

Among forensic identification tools and circumstantial evidence, scientists from JPACused dental comparisons and the Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory usedmitochondrial DNA comparisons in the identification.

With this identification, 7,993 service members still remain missing from the conflict.

For additional information on the Defense Department’s mission to account for missingAmericans, visit the DPMO web site at www.dtic.mil/dpmo or call (703) 699-1420.