alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

831 

KA 13-01178 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROBERT D. SCOTT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ALAN WILLIAMS OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Genesee County Court (Robert C.

Noonan, J.), dated May 28, 2013. The order determined that defendant

is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he

is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act

([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Contrary to defendant’s

contention, County Court properly agreed with the recommendation of

the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders that an upward departure from

the presumptive risk level was warranted based upon aggravating

factors not taken into account by the risk assessment guidelines,

i.e., those relating to his risk of re-offense. Contrary to

defendant’s contention, the court properly concluded that the

guidelines did not adequately take into account his lack of insight

into the inappropriateness of his conduct (see People v Cruz, 111 AD3d

685, 685-686, lv denied 22 NY3d 860), and that defendant’s California

felony conviction, while not a “sex offense” under SORA (see § 168-a

[2] [d] [i], [ii]), nevertheless had a sexual component (see People v

Faver, 113 AD3d 662, 663, lv denied 22 NY3d 865; People v Galindo, 107

AD3d 603, 604). In addition, the evidence supports the court’s

conclusion that those factors are causally related to defendant’s risk

of re-offense (see People v Abraham, 39 AD3d 1208, 1209). Finally, we

conclude that defendant received effective assistance of counsel at

the SORA hearing (see People v Russell, 115 AD3d 1236, 1236). 

Entered: July 3, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 22 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 22 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 22 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 22 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 22 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 22 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 22 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 22 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 22 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 22 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 22 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 22 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 22 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 22 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 22 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP Document 22 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 16 of 16
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 2179** 

MITCHELL JONES , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CRISFIELD, c/o Charles Goldsborough , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. J. Frederick Motz , Senior District Judge. ( 1:14

- cv
— 00847

- JFM )

Submitted : January 15, 2015 Decided: January 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Mitchell Jones, Appel lant Pro Se. Carrie Blackburn R iley, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Mitchell Jones appeals the district court ’ s order
grant ing summary judgment to D efendant in Jones’ housing

discrimination suit

. On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

Because Jones ’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for
the district court’s disposition, Jones has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order. Accordingly , we affirm the

district court ’ s judgment . We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and lega l contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Soldier Accounted For From Korean War (Lee, C.)

/ Published Nov. 10, 2021
WASHINGTON,
# EUR-Lex - 32007M4537 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32007M4537

**Commission Decision of 16/02/2007 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.4537 - LBO FRANCE / CONSOLIS) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

Brussels, 16.02.2007

SG-Greffe(2007) D/200718

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No. COMP/M.4537 – LBO France/Consolis

Notification of 15.01.2007 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1]

Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 19, dated 27/01/2007, page. 17.

1. On 15.01.2007, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the aforementioned Council Regulation by which the undertaking LBO France Gestion SAS ("LBO France", France) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of Consolis SAS ("Consolis", France) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for LBO: investment fund;

- for Consolis: design and manufacture of prefabricated concrete elements.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5 (b) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

signed

Philip LOWE

Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32

--------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,948
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,736
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,253
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,285
<PP&E>                                           2,433
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,373
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,273
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,318
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,373
<SALES>                                         18,792
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           10,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (159)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,131)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        54
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,077)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.37)
        


</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-14948-AKH Document 6 Filed 11/15/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-14948-AKH Document 6 Filed 11/15/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 23.0--CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in  Registration  Statement
(Form  S-3 No.  33-58161),  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  33-61437),
Registration  Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-01735),  Registration  Statement (Form
S-3  No.   333-12433),   Registration   Statement  (Form  S-3  No.   333-39221),
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 2-94805),  Registration Statement (Form S-8
No.  33-40353),  Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No.  33-73620),  Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No.  333-41197) and in Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-67261)  of  our  report  dated  February  13,  2002,  with  respect  to  the
consolidated  financial  statements and schedule  included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) of Inter-Tel, Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 2001.


Phoenix, Arizona             /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
March 22, 2002
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Annual Report of IRIS International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the Report), I, Martin G. Paravato, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 3. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of the period covered
by the Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 11, 2005



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ MARTIN G. PARAVATO 
|Martin G. Paravato     
|Chief Financial Officer



This certification shall not be deemed
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Ace. Such certification sharll not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### IN RE FORESTRY FOUNDATION

No. 101 PC.

Case below: 35 N.C. App. 414.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 6 June 1978.
#### STATE v. VANDYKE

No. 115 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 619.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 June 1976. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 1 June 1976.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF JACOBSON STORES INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES AS
OF, AND FOR THE THIRTY-NINE WEEK PERIOD ENDED, OCTOBER 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                                        <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                               OCT-30-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              9-MOS
<CASH>                                                                 622
<SECURITIES>                                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       28,035
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           446
<INVENTORY>                                                        104,479
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   138,953
<PP&E>                                                             179,769
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      96,807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     241,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               58,300
<BONDS>                                                            108,805
<COMMON>                                                             5,975
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                                          61,522
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       241,987
<SALES>                                                            302,525
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   302,525
<CGS>                                                              202,990
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      202,990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   5,274
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     (5,293)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        (1,853)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 (3,440)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        (3,440)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                        (0.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        (0.59)


</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.04 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Order entered February 14, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01169-CV

JAMES PHELPS, ET AL., Appellants

V.

EFRAIN GARCIA, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-10-07686

ORDER

The Court has before it appellant James Phelps’s February 11, 2013 third motion to 

extend time to file appellant’s brief and appellees’ February 12, 2013 response to that motion. 

The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS appellant James Phelps to file his brief by 

February 18, 2013. No further extensions will be granted absent a showing of exceptional 

circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KENNETH ARTHUR HALL, JR.

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee.

No. 4D 1 9

- 791

[ June 27, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 0 0 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Robert E. Belanger

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 56

- 200 6

- CF

- 00 5213 A

.

Kenneth Arthur Hall, Jr., Crawfordville

, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR

, D AMOORGIAN and C IKLIN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.15 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery