alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40970 Summary Calendar

DOUGLAS JAMES DURHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:96-CV-431

- - - - - - - - - - April 18, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM: * Douglas J. Durham, Texas inmate # 574899, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) requires a prisoner appealing in forma pauperis to pay the full filing fee, $105. Durham has insufficient funds to pay the full fee. Durham shall pay to the Clerk of the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas an initial partial filing fee of $3.82 which is 20 percent of hisNo. 96-40970 - 2 - average monthly balance. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)(A). Additionally, Durham is required to make monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month’s income credited to his account until the full filing fee is paid. See § 1915(b)(2). The agency having custody of Durham shall collect the remainder of the $105 filing fee and forward payment to the Clerk of the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2) each time the amount in Durham’s account exceeds $10, until the full $105 filing fee is paid. To establish his failure-to-protect claim, Durham must have shown that he was “incarcerated under conditions posing a substantial risk of serious harm and that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his need for protection.” Neals v. Norwood , 59 F.3d 530, 533 (5th Cir. 1995). Durham’s own allegations show that prison officials have twice transferred him to different units and placed him in segregated portions of those units for his protection. These efforts to protect Durham were not only reasonable, but they were effective as Durham had not been assaulted for over six months prior to the hearing held in this matter. This appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983).
IFP GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case 1:07-cr-00356-RMB Document 20 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 1 of 1
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Recent News & Stories             
  -  News Releases             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.96 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-22-00031-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

153rd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 153-321452-20

Before Wallach, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE MILTON FABER, Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, real parties in 

interests’ responses, relator’s reply, and real party in interest’s reply and is of the 

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: February 17, 2022
#### Patricia ZAMBRYSKI, Josef S. Schell, Jean P.E.C. Hernalsteens, Marc C. Van Montague, Luis R.H. Estrella, and Jan J.A. Leemans, Appellants, v. Stephen G. ROGERS, Robert B. Horsch, and Robert T. Fraley, Cross Appellants.

No. 05-1166, 05-1212.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 17, 2005.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the joint motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal and cross-appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Exhibit
32.2








KINDER
MORGAN, INC.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906


OF
THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in
the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Kinder Morgan, Inc. and will be retained by Kinder Morgan, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.








Dated:  November
      13, 2009
            
            /s/
      Kimberly A. DangKimberly
      A. Dang
              Vice
      President and Chief Financial
Officer
<PAGE>   1







                                   EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.33-77564) and in
the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-28936, No. 33-40802, No.
33-82342 and 333-28557) of American Bankers Insurance Group, Inc. of our report
dated March 25, 1998 appearing on page 45 of this Form 10-K.




/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP



Miami, Florida
March 30, 1998


                                      E-3
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 222 (Friday, November 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 69985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22857]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Renewal of the Advisory Committee on Water Information 
Charter

    Summary: Following consultation with the General Services 
Administration, notice is hereby given that the Secretary of the 
Interior is renewing the Advisory Committee on Water Information 
(ACWI).
    The ACWI has been established under the authority of the Office of 
Management and Budget and Budget Memorandum No. M-92-01 and the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act. The purpose of this Presidential Committee is 
to represent the interests of water-information users and professionals 
in advising the Federal Government on Federal water-information 
programs and their effectiveness in meeting the Nation's water-
information needs. Member organizations help to foster communications 
between the Federal and non-Federal sectors on sharing water 
information.
    Membership represents a wide range of water resources interests and 
functions. Representation on the ACWI includes all levels of 
government, academia, private industry, and professional and technical 
societies. Member organizations designate their representatives and 
alternates. Membership is limited to a maximum of 35 organizations.
    The Committee will function solely as an advisory body, and in 
compliance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. 
The Charter will be filed under the Act, 15 days from the date of 
publication of this notice.
    For Further Information Contact: Ms. Toni M. Johnson (Executive 
Secretary), Chief, Water Information Coordination Program, U.S. 
Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, MS 417, Reston VA 20192. 
Telephone: 703-648-6810; Fax: 703-648-5644.

    Dated: November 7, 2005.
Gale A. Norton,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 05-22857 Filed 11-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-Y7-M
Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 3 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 1 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 3 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 2 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 3 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 3 of 4Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 3 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 4 of 4
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.76 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
**Exhibit32.1**

 

Certification of

Chief Executive Officer

of Supreme Industries, Inc. Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

This certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and accompanies the annual reporton Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) for the year ended December 31, 2005 of SupremeIndustries, Inc. (the “Company”). I, Herbert M. Gardner, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify that, based on my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Form 10-K fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for theperiods covered in this report.

 

 
| Dated: March 30, 2006   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |
|                    |
| /s/ Herbert M. Gardner  |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                         |        |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 220 (Wednesday, November 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 69565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22748]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Notice of Agreement Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit 
comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, 
Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears 
in the Federal Register. Copies of agreements are available through the 
Commission's Office of Agreements (202-523-5793 or 
[email protected]).
    Agreement No.: 011924.
    Title: CSAL/CMA CGM Cross Slot Charter Agreement.
    Parties: China Shipping Container Lines Co., Ltd.; China Shipping 
Container Lines (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd., and CMA CGM, S.A.
    Filing Party: Paul M. Keane, Esq.; Cichanowicz, Callan, Keane, 
Vengrow & Textor LLP; 61 Broadway, Suite 3000; New York, NY 10006-2802.
    Synopsis: The agreement allows the parties to charter space to each 
other on separate strings in the trades between U.S. Gulf and West 
Coast ports and ports in the Far East.

    By order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: November 10, 2005.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-22748 Filed 11-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
```
# L_2007316EN.01000301.xml

| 4.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 316/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 316/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1416/2007

of 3 December 2007

fixing the time limit for the submission of applications for private storage aid in respect of pigmeat

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in pigmeat (1), and in particular Article 4(6) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Private storage aid granted pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1267/2007 of 26 October 2007 on special conditions for the granting of private storage aid for pigmeat (2) has had a favourable effect on the pigmeat market. A temporary stabilisation of prices is expected. The granting of private storage aid for pigmeat should therefore be ended. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Private storage aid granted pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1267/2007 of 26 October 2007 on special conditions for the granting of private storage aid for pigmeat (2) has had a favourable effect on the pigmeat market. A temporary stabilisation of prices is expected. The granting of private storage aid for pigmeat should therefore be ended.

| (2) | The Management Committee for Pigmeat has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Management Committee for Pigmeat has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The time limit for the submission of applications for private storage aid for pigmeat shall be 4 December 2007.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 December 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 December 2007.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 283, 27.10.2007, p. 53.

2

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7828

CHARLES PATRICK MAMANUS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE; MAJOR REDMAN; LIEUTENANT BOYERS; D. CAMPBELL, Lieutenant; ASSISTANT WARDEN HOLLER; ASSISTANT WARDEN DAY; L. M. SAUNDERS; L. W. HUFFMAN; SERGEANT SAMPSON; M. PETERS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RIDGEWAY; OFFICER BURDETTE; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SNEAD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-817-7) Submitted: April 18, 2003 Decided: May 6, 2003 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Patrick McManus, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Charles Patrick McManus appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. The district court dismissed the complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). Because McManus may amend his complaint to state a viable claim, the dismissal order is not final and thus is not subject to appellate review. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument wold no aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
S. 1436 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

An Act 

To make technical corrections to the computation of average pay under Public 

Law 110–279. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO COMPUTATION OF AVERAGE PAY UNDER PUBLIC LAW 110–279. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1(c)(2)(A) of Public Law 110–279 (2 

U.S.C. 2051(c)(2)(A)) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘For purposes of’’ and all that follows 

through ‘‘(i) any period’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘(i) TREATMENT OF SERVICE.—For purposes of chapters 83, 84, and 87 of title 5, United States Code, 

any period’’; 

(2) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and inserting a period; 

and 

(3) in clause (ii)— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘TREATMENT OF PAY.—For purposes 

of chapter 87 of title 5, United States Code,’’ before ‘‘the 

rate of basic pay’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘the covered’’ and inserting ‘‘a covered’’. 

(b) REGULATIONS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the Office of Personnel 

Management shall promulgate regulations to carry out this 

section. 

(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The regulations promulgated under 

paragraph (1) shall take effect not later than 180 days after 

the date of enactment of this Act. 

(c) APPLICABILITY OF AMENDMENTS.— 

(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection, the terms ‘‘contractor’’, ‘‘covered individual’’, and ‘‘food services contract’’ have 

the meanings given those terms in section 1(a) of Public Law 

110–279 (2 U.S.C. 2051(a)). 

(2) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by this section 

shall apply with respect to— 

(A) a covered individual who separates from service 

as an employee of a contractor performing services under 

the food services contract before, on, or after the date 

of enactment of this Act; and 

(B) each payment to a covered individual under chapter 

83 or 84 of title 5, United States Code, made on or after 
S. 1436—2 

the effective date of the regulations promulgated under 

subsection (b). 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### PAUL v. COMR. OF MOTOR VEHICLES

No. 53 PC.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 731.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 May 1980.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CHRISTIN BILOTTI,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-683

[August 25, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 08-003720-CF-10B.

Matthew R. McLain of McLain Law, P.A., Longwood, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Case 1:07-cr-00356-RMB Document 26 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 1 of 1