alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernesto HERNANDEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-50751.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided April 20, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ernesto Hernandez-Garcia raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.32 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### TOWN OF BLADENBORO v. McKEITHAN

No. 76.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 459.

Motion of plaintiff to dismiss appeal for failure to comply with Rules allowed 22 April 1980.
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 1930

BRIEN O. HILL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. LEARNING EXPERIENCE , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Gerald Bruce Lee , District Judge. ( 1:15

- cv - 01593

- GBL

- TCB )

Submitted : October 17, 2017 Decided: October 19, 2017

Before FLOYD and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Brien O. Hill , Appellant Pro Se. Richard Maxwell Volin , VOLIN EMPLOYMENT LAW, PLLC , Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Brien O. Hill appeals the distr ict court’s order granting summary judgment to The Learning Experience (“TLE”) on Hill’s disability discrimination claim

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hill v. Learning Experience , No. 1:15

- cv - 01593

- GBL

- TCB (E.D. Va. filed July 28, 2017 & entered July 31, 2017)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument woul d not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 23.2


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Voice Control Systems, Inc.
Dallas, Texas

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-19309), pertaining to the Voice Processing
Corporation 1989 Stock Plan and the Voice Processing Corporation 1997 Stock
Plan of our report dated January 28, 1999, relating to the financial statements
of Voice Control Systems, Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                                     /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
      

Dallas, Texas
March 30, 1999
EXHIBIT 32B
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of AutoInfo, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William I. Wunderlich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
 
 Dated:March 17, 2011
 
 
 /s/ William I. Wunderlich
 William I. Wunderlich
 Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Financial Officer)
Order entered April 2 1 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 22 - 00031 - CR No. 05 - 22 - 0003 2 - CR No. 05 - 22 - 0003 3 - CR No. 05 - 22 - 0003 4 - CR No. 05 - 22 - 0003 5 - CR No. 05 - 22 - 0003 6 - CR DAVID RAY JAKUBIEC , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the Crimina l District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F 21 - 75233 - X , F 21 - 7523 4 - X , F 21 - 40264 - X , F 21 - 4026 5 -

X , F 21 - 4 8147 - X & F 21 - 7523 5 - X

O RDER Before t he Court is appellant ’ s April 19, 2022 second motion for an extension of time to file his brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant ’ s brief due by May 20, 2022. / s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 223 (Monday, November 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 70080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22934]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Review of Resource-Related Research Project 
Applications (R24s).
    Date: December 7, 2005.
    Time: 3 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Mark Roltsch, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, NHLBI, National Institutes of Health, 
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7192, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Review of Resource-Related Research Project 
Applications (R24s).
    Date: December 15, 2005.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Rockledge, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20814, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Mark Roltsch, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, NHLBI, National Institutes of Health, 
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7192, Bethesda, MD 20892.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 14, 2005.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-22934 Filed 11-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-03312-PAC     Document 3      Filed 08/01/2007     Page 1 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-03312-PAC     Document 3      Filed 08/01/2007     Page 2 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-03312-PAC     Document 3      Filed 08/01/2007     Page 3 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-03312-PAC     Document 3      Filed 08/01/2007     Page 4 of 4
# Soldier Missing From Korean War Accounted For (Conklin)

/ Published Nov. 6, 2013

The Department of Defense POW/Missing Personnel Office (DPMO) announced todaythat the remains of a U.S. serviceman, missing from the Korean War, have been identified andwill be returned to his family for burial with full military honors.

Army Cpl. George W. Conklin Jr., 18, of Phelps, N.Y., will be buried Nov. 9, in his hometown. In late November 1950, Conklin and members of Company I, 31st Regimental CombatTeam (RCT), historically known as Task Force Faith, were deployed along the eastern banks ofthe Chosin Reservoir, North Korea. From Nov. 27 to Dec. 1, Chinese forces encircled and overranthe U.S. positions forcing the 31st RCT to withdraw south along Route 5 to a more defensibleposition. Following the battle, on Dec. 3, 1950, Conklin was reported missing in action.

From Sept. 21-27, 2004, a Joint U.S./Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (D.P.R.K.)team surveyed a field south of the Pungnyuri-gang inlet of the Chosin Reservoir and a second sitelocated south of Route 5. They recovered human remains and material evidence, includinguniform insignia worn by the U.S. Infantry and Field Artillery personnel circa 1950.

To identify the remains, scientists from the Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command(JPAC) and the Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory (AFDIL) used circumstantialevidence and forensic identification tools, including mitochondrial DNA – which matchedConklin’s brother.

Using modern technology, identifications continue to be made from remains that wererecovered or previously turned over by North Korean officials. As of Nov. 5, there are 7,903Americans who remain unaccounted for from the Korean War.

For additional information on the Defense Department’s mission to account for missingAmericans, visit the DPMO web site at www.dtic.mil/dpmo or call (703) 699-1169.
#### HAZARD v. HAZARD

No. 202 PC

Case below: 46 NC App 280

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 15 August 1980.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Recent News & Stories             
  -  News Releases             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.19 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Document

EXHIBIT 10.5

AMENDMENT #1 
TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This AMENDMENT #1 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is effective as of March 23, 2020, by and between BALDWIN RISK PARTNERS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), and Bradford L. Hale (“Employee”).  


BACKGROUND


The Company employs Employee pursuant to that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Employee (the “Employment Agreement”), which became effective as of the IPO Closing Date (as defined in the Employment Agreement). 


The Company and Employee desire to amend the Employment Agreement on the terms set forth herein effective as of the date first written above.    


OPERATIVE TERMS


    The parties agree as follows:


1.The first sentence of Section 4(b)(i) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated as follows:
“For each calendar year during the Employment Period beginning with 2020, Employee shall be eligible to receive an annual bonus (the “Bonus”) with a target amount equal to at least 50% of the Base Salary for the year based on the success of the Company in achieving financial and/or non-financial targets, metrics, goals or other objectives for the year.”
2.Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 








[Signature Page Follows]
1


    
    







The parties hereto have executed this Amendment to be effective as of the date first written above.


COMPANY


BALDWIN RISK PARTNERS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 




By: /s/ Chris Stephens            
Name: Chris Stephens            
Title: General Counsel            




EMPLOYEE




/s/ Bradford L. Hale            
Name: Bradford L. Hale    




Signature page to Amendment #1 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement -- Hale
瞭解您的權利

性別歧視

OFCCP 保障您免於遭受性別歧視

聯邦合約規範遵循計劃辦公室 (OFCCP) 施

行第 11246 號行政命令,於修訂後禁止聯

邦承包商和分包商因員工和求職者的性別

而歧視此等人士。

1.	 什麼是性別歧視?

就業歧視通常存在於:由於您性別的關係,僱

主不合理地對待身為員工或求職者的您。歧視

也存在於:僱主看似公平的政策或程序,卻因

為員工或求職者的性別的關係,而對此等人士

帶來重大的負面影響。

2.	 承包商可否依照性別刻板印象而給員工不

同待遇?

不可。僱主不得依照您的性別給付您不同的薪

資或提供不同的附加福利。例如,他們不得因

您的性別而拒給加班、訓練、或者較高薪資或

較高薪資職位的機會。附加福利包括醫療、住

院、意外、壽險,及退休福利;分紅及獎勵方

案;放假,及其他就業條件、情形及優遇。

3.	 承包商可否依照性別刻板印象而給員工不

同待遇?

不可。承包商不得因您不遵從男女的外表或行

為應當如何,或男女應該做哪種工作,而憑刻

板印象待您不公。

4.	 照護者是否受到性別歧視保障?

是的。承包商不得基於對照護職責的刻板假

設,對您待遇不同。例如,承包商對身為父親

者開放的就業機會,不得拒絕給予身為母親

者;對母親提供的彈性工作安排,亦不可拒絕

實施於身為父親者。

5.	 我的僱主是否必須平等地為我提供工作與

發展機會?

是的。承包商必須平等地為您提供工作與發展

機會。除非承包商能說明僅限男性或

女性能完成此等要求,否則不得以性

別為依據訂定要求。此外,

承包商訂定的要求不得讓求職者因性

別而失利,除非此等要求與工作相關

並且為必需內容。承包商不得依性別而

決定拒絕向您提供可晉升至高薪職位的

訓練、工作指派或其他發展機會。

6.	 OFCCP 是否保障我免受承包商性騷

擾?

是的。性騷擾是性別歧視的一種形

式。OFCCP 保障您免受不受歡迎的性前

戲、求歡、就一人的性別口出冒犯言辭,

及其他基於性別的惱人言行。不得以這些

行徑作為您的就業條件或條件,禁止以屈

服或拒絕此等行為作為決定僱用的依據,

或讓此等行為無理干擾您的工作表現,亦不

可營造恫嚇、敵意或冒犯的工作環境。

7.	 OFCCP 如何保障懷孕婦女與新任母

親?

聯邦承包商的求職者以及員工受到保障,

免因懷孕、分娩或相關醫療情形遭受歧視,

包括失去工作、薪資及健康照護保險保障。

此外,承包商若為其他工作人員(例如失能或

工傷者)提供工作場所彈性,此類情況下也必

須為懷孕、分娩或有相關醫療情形的員工提供

相當的工總場所彈性。

8.	 跨性別的工作者如何受到 OFCCP 保障?

承包商不得因性別認同而有所歧視。承包商必須

允許員工和求職者使用其所認同性別的盥洗室、

更衣室、淋浴間及類似設施。此外,承包商提供

的健康照護福利方案不得因為性別認同或跨性別

情形而拒絕提供或限制健康照護保障。

9.	 OFCCP 保護哪些人?

OFCCP 保障與聯邦政府有業務往來的公司之員工

和求職者的權利,包括銀行、資訊科技公司、肉品

包裝工廠、零售商店、製造廠、會計事務所和建築

公司等機構的員工。

200 CONSTITUTION AVENUE NW | WASHINGTON, DC 20210 | 電話: 1-800-397-6251 | TTY: 1-877-889-5627 | www.dol.gov/ofccp
10.	若我認為僱主因為我的身障而歧視我,我該

怎麼做?

若您認為在就業或求職上遭受歧視,可向 OFCCP 

投訴。就算不確定僱主是否為聯邦承包商或分包

商,亦可提出投訴。

11.	如何向 OFCCP 提出投訴?

您可透過以下方式提出歧視投訴:

• 透過 OFCCP 網站填寫並提交線上表格;

• 親自到 OFCCP 辦公室填寫表格;或

• 將填妥的表格郵寄、傳送電子郵件或傳真至

負責據稱存在的歧視發生地點的 OFCCP 辦公

室。

此表格可線上取得,網址 http://www.dol.gov/

ofccp/regs/compliance/pdf/pdfstart.htm ,OFCCP 

所有辦公室亦備有紙本表格。欲搜尋您所在地附

近的辦公室,請造訪網站: http://www.dol.gov/

ofccp/contacts/ofnation2.htm. 瀏覽 OFCCP 辦公

室線上列表。

填妥投訴表後請別忘了簽名。如果忘記簽

名,OFCCP 仍會受理您的投訴,但 OFCCP 調

查人員會在後續訪談時要求您補簽。欲投訴因種

族、膚色、宗教、性別、性取向、性別認同或原

國籍而遭遇的歧視,必須在據稱存在的歧視發生

日起 180 天內提出,除非因充足理由延長提起投

訴的期限。相同的 180 天期限規定也適用於聲稱

因討論、揭露或詢問薪資而遭遇的歧視。

12.	僱主可否因為我提出投訴而解僱我、降我的

職,或不合理地對待我?

不可以。僱主若因您提出投訴或參與調查而報復

您,即屬違法行為。OFCCP 法規保障您不因主

張自身權利而受到騷擾、恐嚇、威脅、強迫或報

復。

13.	我可以同時向 OFCCP 和平等就業機會委員會

/ Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 

(EEOC) 提出歧視投訴嗎?

可以。如果您同時向 OFCCP 和 EEOC 提出投訴,將

僅由一所機構進行調查。

OFCCP 通常會自行處理和調查因求職者和員工的性

取向或性別認同受歧視,而對聯邦承包商提出的投

訴。OFCCP 一某個員工或求般也會自行處理聲稱因看

似已形成影響職者群體的歧視模式,而提出的投訴;

以及指向失能、具受保障的退伍軍人身分,或由於您

討論、透露或詢問薪酬而遭受的歧視行為。

14.	如果發現我是就業歧視的受害者,會怎麼樣?

您有權獲得補償,獲得未發生歧視時您本可獲得的職

位。您有權受雇、獲得晉升、復職或重新派任。您也

有權獲得欠發的薪資、未來的薪資賠償、加薪或綜合

上述各項的補償。此外,若 OFCCP 發現聯邦承包商

或分包商歧視員工或求職者,OFCCP 未來可將其列

入聯邦合約禁止或拒絕往來戶、要求取消公司目前合

約。

如需更多資訊,請洽:

the u.s. department of labor

Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs

200 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20210

1-800-397-6251

TTY: 1-877-889-5627

www.dol.gov/ofccp

請注意:本資訊表提供的是一般資訊,無法取代文中所述計劃的實際相關法律與法規。

200 CONSTITUTION AVENUE NW | WASHINGTON, DC 20210 | 電話: 1-800-397-6251 | TTY: 1-877-889-5627 | www.dol.gov/ofccp 2016 年 9 月修訂
#### STATE v. ALEXANDER

No. 120 PC.

Case below: 18 N.C. App. 460.

Second petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 November 1973.
#### Mark G. COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew J. PLATTS and Name Beads International, LLC, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 04-1595.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 15, 2005.

*ORDER*

Andrew J. Platts et al. (Platts) move without opposition to voluntarily dismiss their appeal of the September 14, 2004 order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri in *Collins v. Platts,*No. 02-CV-00886 (E.D.Mo. Sept. 14, 2004).

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The unopposed motion to dismiss is granted.*

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

*

 We note that Platts requests that this dismissal be with prejudice, however, it is not the practice of this court to dismiss with or without prejudice. 04-1595