alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 4053** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ALONZO LEE JOHNSON, a/k/a Lil Zo , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court fo r the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Frank D. Whitney , District Judge. ( 3:07

- cr - 00061

- FDW

- 6 )

Submitted : August 30, 2010 Decided: September 10 , 2010

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published pe r curiam opinion
. Eric A. Bach, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney , Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
A lonzo Lee Johnson pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute fifty grams or more of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) , (b)(1)(A), 846 (2006) . The district court sentenced Johnson within the advisory Guidelines range t o 160 months’ imprisonment
. On appeal, counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), noting no meritorious issues for appeal, but questioning the voluntariness of Johnson’s plea and whether the sentence imposed was reason able. Johnson filed
a pro se supplemental brief raising the same issues and arguing that he is entitled to a sentence reduction based on the sentencing disparities involving cocaine powder and cocaine base. Finding no error, we affirm. We have review ed the record and conclude that the district court substantially complied with the requirements of Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 and ensured that Johnson’s plea was knowing and voluntary . We also conclude that the district court imposed a sentence that is procedura lly and substantively reasonable.
See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007) (review of sentence is for abuse of discretion). In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for
ap peal. We have considered the claims asserted in Johnson’s pro3 se supplemental brief and conclude they are without merit. We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. We also deny Johnson’s motion for substitution of counsel and to place this
appea l in abeyance
. This court requires that counsel inform Johnson , in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Johnson requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such filing would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that
a copy thereof was served on Johnson
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 22-5179 September Term, 2021

1:22-cv-00975-UNA

Filed On: August 24, 2022

Helene Tonique Laurent Miller,

Appellant

v.

Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President, et al.,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Katsas and Rao, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit Judge

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s amended order filed June

15, 2022, be affirmed. The district court correctly concluded that appellant’s complaint

failed to comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) (requiring a complaint to contain “a short and plain statement of the

grounds for the court’s jurisdiction,” “a short and plain statement of the claim showing

that the pleader is entitled to relief,” and “a demand for the relief sought”). 

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Cesar M. Garcia, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that the Annual Report of IRIS International, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IRIS International, Inc. 

 

Date: March 5, 2009 

 

This certification shall not bedeemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### STATE v. JONES

No. 9 PC.

Case below: 24 N.C. App. 280.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 May 1975.
Case 1:06-cv-00694-PKC Document 3 Filed 02/06/2006 Page 1 of 1
USLX: SDhT 

I 1 DOClJMl73T 

LWI'l'E1) STATES DISTRIC 1- COIIRI' I BLECTgG:;iC?,I,Z 

; E i I 

SOUTlIERN D1STRIC"I' i)F KEW YORK +-* 

iL$: ;-J: <? -f y- cJ, 

/ 1 ._ .......................................................................... ---- .,~y-._ ~i i -* 

IN KII: 

j LIXS'I'EK FILE 

FOSAMAX PKODUCTS LIABl [.IT Y L1'I~lGA'I''IC)N 

: 1 :06-M1)- 1789 (JFK) 

This Dorumeni Rel~ii~>s 7 '0 '11 I1 Act ions 

............................... ............_ I 

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO H.4C VICE 

C'onsidering the C'crtificate of Good Standing and all other documenls required by Casc 

Management Order No. 5 submitted b>- counsel. IT IS 1 1EKt:HY OKDERED that: 

Firn~ Name: Butler, Snow1 O'Mara, SIC\-C~S & Cannada. PLLC 

Address: AmSouth Pla7a. 2 10 Easl Capitol Strcet, Suite 1700 

Email Address: Christy.Jones~~bi~tlersuow.com 

is ddmittcd to practice pro hac vice as counsel li)r Merck & Co., Inc. in the above captioned case 

in the United States District Court for thc Southern District ofNc~\- l'c3rk. 

lie~v York, N~M J'ork 

Ad V -. -- 

~niicd ~[kc~ District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03296-JFK Document 20 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 1 of 3
cer-tfy that . - 

MISSISSIPPI 

Christy D. Jones 

CERTIFTCATE OF 

GO00 STANDlNCI 

, Bar # 

, Clerk qf this Court, 

~~as duly udmitted to practice h illis Court OH 

September 30, 1977 , nild is ill good standing 

as o nzemher ofthe Bar oj'this Court. 

Jackson. -- .- - Mississippi . . - - . -- - . - - . 011 March 4, 2008 . . - - -. - -. . -- -- 

/ (JC 11 770 1 1 I., 1 r.r ~ 

Dated (7t 

1. T. NOBLIN 

C'L ERK 

Case 1:07-cv-03296-JFK Document 20 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 2 of 3
1. David C:reivs, Clerk ul'tllc United Sratcs District CIourl lbr the Knrthern District of 

Mississippi, cei-ljfj the nttorncy idcrltilied below WJS ciuil aiiillitted tcj pwc~iz;: b~fbi~~ this 

Court vn the date s~atcd and is. 3s of the dart ul this certiti~atc, in good standing as a mcnlber of 

the Bar oi-lhc IJnitcd States Tlislrict Cou~l fur tllc Nort11~1-17 Ilistrict of' hlissis~ippi. 

~).\TL .A D.11 ITTE 11: OC-~ODLR 10,1978 

C;i~:en undcr m>- 11iind and Scal of this I'ourt. 

Case 1:07-cv-03296-JFK Document 20 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of the Company for the six months
ended June 30, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000054291
<NAME> KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              20
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      376
<ALLOWANCES>                                         6
<INVENTORY>                                        480
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   978
<PP&E>                                           2,024
<DEPRECIATION>                                     946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              639
<BONDS>                                            996
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               18
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                          78
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,204
<SALES>                                          1,108
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,108
<CGS>                                              924
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      924
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    40
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  57
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     36
<INCOME-TAX>                                        14
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 23
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        23
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 
                           SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ZiLOG, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Darin Billerbeck, as Chief Executive Officer of ZiLOG, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZiLOG, Inc.



| |                               
| | ------------------------------
| | Date: June 30, 2008           
| |                               
| | By:    /s/ Darin G. Billerbeck

| |                                                
| | -----------------------------------------------
| |                                                
| | Darin G. Billerbeck                            
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

In connection with the Annual Report of ZiLOG, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Perry J. Grace, as Chief Financial Officer of ZiLOG, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of ZiLOG, Inc.



| |                          
| | -------------------------
| | Date: June 30, 2008      
| |                          
| | By:    /s/ Perry J. Grace

| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| |                                                     
| | Perry J. Grace                                      
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---
#### APARTMENTS, INC. v. HANES

No. 126 PC.

Case below: 8 N.C. App. 894.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 28 August 1970.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet at March 31, 1999 and the Statement of Income for the three months ended
March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              43
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,001
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,242
<INVENTORY>                                     43,696
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,567
<PP&E>                                       3,658,170
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,147,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,035,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          151,636
<BONDS>                                        684,178
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,065,634
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,035,851
<SALES>                                        133,910
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,910
<CGS>                                           25,749
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  103,738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,262
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,655
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,905
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,905
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 19

- 15095 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5:16

- cr - 00020

- JDW

- PRL

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus CARLOS HUMBERTO MORENO

- HERNAN DEZ, a.k.a. Carlos Moreno Hernandez, a.k.a. Carlos Garcia Moreno, a.k.a. Jorge Cardenas Martinez, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the Un ited States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (Octo b er 6, 2020) Before NEWSOM , LAGOA and ANDERSON , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 19-15095 Date Filed: 10/06/2020 Page: 1 of 22 Meghan Ann Collins , appointed counsel for Carlos Humberto Moreno

Hernandez in this direct criminal appea l, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appea l is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Moreno

- Hernandez ’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 19-15095 Date Filed: 10/06/2020 Page: 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of the Suspension of RONALD L. WARREN, Attorney at Law

No. 12343

December 18, 1980,

effective January 17, 1981

ORDER

The State Bar of Nevada, Disciplinary Board, Southern District, has petitioned this court to impose the stated form of discipline contained in the conditional plea of guilty tendered by Ronald L. Warren, Attorney at Law. The conditional plea of guilty has been approved by six members of the Disciplinary Board. *See*SCR 113(1).

Good cause appearing, the conditional plea is approved and the petition is granted. Accordingly, we

ORDER that Ronald L. Warren, Attorney at Law, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of seven years, and that at the conclusion of this seven-year period, Ronald L. Warren may petition this court for reinstatement.

It is further

ORDERED that during the period of his suspension, Ronald L. Warren must comply with the following conditions:

1. That he violate no criminal law;

2. That he not take part in any conduct involving civil fraud, conversion, misrepresentation, dishonesty, deceit or moral turpitude;

3. That he not practice law; and that he not be employed in any capacity in any law office except with the prior approval of the Disciplinary Board, if it should hereafter appear that law office employment would further his rehabilitation;

4. That he comply with all provisions of Nevada Supreme Court Rule 116;

5. That he pay the costs of the investigation and prosecution of this matter, incurred by the State Bar of Nevada, including staff and Bar Counsel fees, in the amount of One *902Thousand Six Hundred Sixteen Dollars and Fifty Eight Cents ($1,616.58);

6. That said costs shall be paid within seven (7) years to the State Bar of Nevada at its Reno, Nevada, office; and

7. That he have no association of any kind with any of the individuals involved in the circumstances giving rise to these disciplinary proceedings.

Mowbray, C. J., and Thompson, Gunderson, Manou-kian, and Batjer, JJ.
EXHIBIT 21 – SUBSIDIARIES
MICROS SYSTEMS, INC. SUBSIDIARIES     Jurisdiction OfName of Subsidiary Incorporation Hospitality Technologies, S.A.  Argentina   HotelBANK Asia Pacific Pty Ltd.  Australia   MICROS-Fidelio Australia Pty Ltd.  Australia   MICROS Foreign Sales Corporation  Barbados   Merchants Information Solutions, Ltd.  Canada   MICROS-Fidelio Information Systems (Shanghai)      Co. Ltd.  China   Fidelio Software (China) Ltd.  China   MSI Delaware, LLC  Delaware   MICROS-Fidelio Software Deutschland GmbH  Federal        Republic of Germany   MICROS Systems Holding GmbH  Federal        Republic of Germany   Fidelio Cruise GmbH  Federal        Republic of Germany   MICROS-Fidelio Software GmbH & Co. KG  Federal        Republic of Germany   Indatec GmbH & Co.KG  Federal        Republic of Germany   MICROS- Fidelio (Ireland), Ltd.  Ireland   Fidelio Nordic Oy  Finland   Fidelio Cruise, Inc.  Florida   MICROS-Fidelio France, S.A.  France   MICROS-Fidelio Hong Kong, Ltd.  Hong Kong   Fidelio India Private Ltd.  India   MICROS-Fidelio Italia S.r.l  Italy   MICROS-Fidelio Japan Ltd.  Japan   MICROS-Fidelio Mexico S.A. de C.V.  Mexico   MICROS-Fidelio Worldwide, Inc.  Nevada   MICROS-Fidelio Southwest, Inc.  Nevada   Fidelio Nordic Norway A/S  Norway   Datavantage Corporation  Ohio   MICROS-Fidelio Software Portugal, ULDA  Portugal   MICROS-Fidelio Singapore Pte Ltd.  Singapore   MICROS-Fidelio España S.L  Spain   Fidelio Nordic Sweden A.B  Sweden   Hotelbk A.B  Sweden   MICROS-Fidelio Software (Thailand) Co. Ltd.  Thailand   MICROS-Fidelio U.K. Ltd.  United Kingdom
The Company has additional subsidiaries, which, considered in the aggregate asa single subsidiary, do not constitute a significant subsidiary.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

EMPLOYMENT STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION 

Office of Workmen's Compensation Programs Washington, D.C 2021 I 

No. 10 

April 2, 1973 

TO: INSURANCE CARRIERS ANO SELF-INSURED EMPLOYERS UNDER THE 

LONGSHOREMEN'S AND HARBOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION ACT, AS 

AMENDED 

SUBJECT: Regulations governing operations and rules of the Benefits 

Review Board 

Attached is a copy of regulations approved by the Secretary of Labor 

on March 1, 1973: 

"Establishment and Operation of the (Benefits 

Review] Board and Rules of Practice and 

Procedure," published March 7, 1973 in the 

Federal Register. Your attention is invited 

to three particular rules: 

a. §802.204 through §802.208--Notice of appeal. 

b. §802.403(b)--Decision of the Board. 

c. §802.405(a) and (b)--Remand. 

Please note further that this is the first distribution of amendment 

Notices No. 8 and No. 9, which are included in this mailing. 

~-eett-"' ~ • <;::~ ..,J (:Ji:_., (-3⁄4 el~ 

JOHN E. STOCKER 

Acting Deputy Director, Office of 

Workmen's Compensation Programs 

Attachment 

I11cl11de your address, ZIP wk, and jil, 111tmber on all correspondence
**Exhibit      32.2**

| (1)     | The              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)              of              the Securities  Exchange              Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)     | The              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the              Company. |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                 April                15 ,                2008 | By:   | /s/   Joe                Noto             |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                          |            | Joe                NotoChief                Financial Officer |
|                                                                          |            |                                                          |

----
Case 1:07-cv-03350-SAS     Document 9      Filed 05/23/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03350-SAS     Document 9      Filed 05/23/2007     Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-14940-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14940-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14940-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14940-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14940-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14940-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14940-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14940-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14940-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14940-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14940-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14940-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14940-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13