alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MARGUERITE DePOTTER, RELATOR, v. JAMES F. PATTEN, RESPONDENT.

Decided March 22, 1932.

*426Before Gtjmmeee, Chief Justice, and Justices Paekee and Case.

Por the relator, *William V. Herer.*

Por the respondent, *David T. Wilentz.*

Pee Cueiam.

The relator, Marguerite DePotter, is a resident, elector, taxpayer and freeholder in the city of Eahway, and seeks by this proceeding to have the office of police justice of that city, to which one James P. Patten, the respondent, was appointed by the common council of Eahway on the 1st of January, 1931, declared vacant. She claims to be entitled to the relief sought by virtue of the following provision of the charter of the city of Eahway, which was granted by the legislature in 1865, viz., “that no person shall be eligible to any office in said city unless he shall then be an elector and resident thereof.” She asserts in her information that at the time of his appointment Patten was neither an elector nor resident of Eahway, and that, consequently, under the charter provision just, recited, his appointment by the common council of the city was in violation of law, and therefore a nullity.

Whether or not Patten was a resident of Eahway at the time of his appointment is a matter in dispute. It is conceded, however, that he was not then an elector of that city. It is contended on his behalf that his eligibility to the office at the time of his appointment did not depend upon whether or not he was an elector of the municipality, but that mere residence therein at that time was sufficient to justify the action of the common council. This contention is based upon the statute of 1877 *(Comp. Stat., p.*3783), entitled “An act relative to offices, commissions and resignations.” This statute provides that “each and every person who shall hereafter hold any office in this state, under the authority thereof, shall reside within this state and execute such office; and also that every person holding an office, the authority *427and duties of which relate to a county only, shall reside in such county; and also that every person holding an office, the authority and duties of which relate to a city or township, shall reside within such city or township.” The relator contends that, although this statute was passed subsequent to the granting of the city charter, it does not affect the provision of that instrument which requires that an office holder shall be not only a resident, but also an elector at the time of his appointment.

In our opinion, this contention is sound. The legislature, by the act of 1877, did not attempt to prescribe the qualifications of a person for an office which is required to be filled by the common council of a municipality. It merely required the residence in the municipality of the appointee during the term for which he was appointed, leaving his qualifications as prescribed by earlier legislation unaffected thereby.

The charter provision of the city of Eahway prescribing the qualifications of persons who may be appointed to office in that municipality still remaining in force, the relator is entitled to judgment.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT .......... SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ...................................................... X 

IN RE: Fosarnas Products LiabiIity 

Litigation 1 :06-md-1789 (JFK) 

ORDER 

Tilts Document Re1art.s to: All Actions 

SEE ATTACHED 

Case 1:07-cv-03296-JFK Document 4 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03296-JFK Document 4 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

___________________________________ ) DAVID L. CALDWELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1084 (RLW) ) NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION On June 20, 2011, defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. In its June 22, 2011 Order, the Court advised the plaintiff, among other things, of his obligation to file an opposition or other response to the motion. Further, that Order expressly warned the plaintiff that, if he failed to file his opposition by July 22, 2011, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an opposition nor requested additional time to do so. The Court will treat defendant’s motion as conceded and will dismiss this action. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: July 29, 2011 ROBERT L. WILKINS United States District Judge /s/
#### STATE v. EARLEY

No. 179 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 636.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 14 July 1977.
Case 1:06-cv-14947-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14947-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14947-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14947-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14947-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14947-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14947-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14947-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14947-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14947-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14947-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14947-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14947-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--- ----------------------------------------------------X

CHARES RICHAS and JAY GEYWITS,

Individually and on Behalf of Al Others

Similarly Situated, as Class Representatives,

07 CV 3350 (SAS)(DC~)

Plaitiffs, JOINT STIPULATION OF

DISMISSAL WITH PREDICE

v.

LANG INUSTRIES, INC., WORlD CLASS

ON SITE MANAGEMENT, LLC, and LANG

WASTE SERVICES CORP.,

Defendants.

- ------------ ----- --- - -- ---- ---------- ------------------ X

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL \VIH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(l)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the paries in the

above-captioned action, by and through counsel, hereby stipulate to the dismissal oftbe action in

íts entirety with prejudice as to Jay Geywts's claims.

~ro~

-"Steven Bennet Blau (SB 40 )

Blau Brown & Leonard, LLC

Attorney for Plaintiff

54 West Street, Suite 1009

New York, New York 10010

(212) 725-7272

/~

Jo . Ho (JH 7831)

BO! d, Schoeneck & King, PLLC

Attorneys for Defendants

330 Madison Avenue, 39th Floor

New York, New York 10017

(646) 253-2320

SO ORDERED:

The Hon. Shira A. Scheíndlin

Dated:

18917.1 5112/2008

Case 1:07-cv-03350-SAS Document 36 Filed 08/04/2008 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JOSTENS,
INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTH
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                     3,240
<RECEIVABLES>                                  115,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,676)
<INVENTORY>                                     88,051
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               242,746
<PP&E>                                         224,887
<DEPRECIATION>                               (154,998)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,075
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          231,250
<BONDS>                                          3,589
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,947
<OTHER-SE>                                     118,049
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,075
<SALES>                                        556,832
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               556,832
<CGS>                                          274,095
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  274,095
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               206,901
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,255
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,498
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 71,338
<INCOME-TAX>                                    29,248
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             42,090
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    42,090
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 1 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 2 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 3 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 4 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 5 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 6 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 7 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 8 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 9 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 10 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 11 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 12 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 13 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 14 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 15 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 16 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 17 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 18 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 19 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 20 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 21 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 22 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 23 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 24 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 25 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 26 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 27 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 28 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 29 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 30 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 31 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 32 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 33 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 34 of 35
Case 1:07-cr-00274-WHP Document 3 Filed 03/05/09 Page 35 of 35
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00326-CR

Phillip Mark Bower, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 426TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 000597, HONORABLE JOHN GAUNTT, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Phillip Mark Bower filed a notice of appeal from the district court’s denial

of his motion to reduce bail. Subsequently, Bower’s counsel filed a motion to dismiss the appeal,

in which he represents that Bower was able to make bail, thus rendering the appeal moot. We grant

the motion and dismiss the appeal.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Field

Dismissed

Filed: July 19, 2013

Do Not Publish
​
Exhibit 10.8
​
Current Director Fee Arrangements
​
Directors of Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. ("Bancorp") receive a monthly fee of $1,500 per regular monthly meeting attended, which is the only compensation paid to directors by Bancorp, except for stock options which may be granted in the discretion of the Board of Directors under Bancorp's 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Directors of Great Southern Bank receive a monthly fee of $3,000 per regular monthly meeting attended. The directors of Bancorp and the directors of the Bank are the same individuals. The directors of Bancorp and its subsidiaries serving on the Audit Committee are paid a fee of $300 per meeting attended, except for the chairman of the Audit Committee, who is paid a fee of $350 per meeting attended.  Director Brown serves on the Bank’s Compliance Committee and is paid a fee of $300 per meeting attended.  The directors of Bancorp and its subsidiaries are not reimbursed for their costs incurred in attending Board and committee meetings.
Exhibit 10.7


 


ClimateRock


 


50 Sloane Avenue


London, SW3 3DD, United Kingdom 


 


[●], 2022


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing
on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration Statement”)
for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of the securities of ClimateRock (the “Company”)
and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination and (ii) the Company’s
liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination
Date”), U.N. SDG Support LLC shall make available to the Company certain office space and administrative and support services
as may be required by the Company from time to time, at 50 Sloane Avenue, London, SW3 3DD, United Kingdom. In exchange therefore, the
Company shall pay U.N. SDG Support LLC $10,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination
Date.


 


U.N. SDG Support LLC hereby agrees that it does
not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust
Account”) that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account
for any reason whatsoever.


 


This agreement may not be amended, modified or
waived as to any particular provision, except by a written instrument executed by the parties hereto.


 


No party hereto may assign this agreement or any
rights, interests or contracted obligations hereunder without the prior written approval of the other party. Any purported assignment
in violation of this paragraph shall be void and ineffectual and shall not operate to transfer or assign any interest or title to the
purported assignee.


 


This agreement shall be governed by, construed
in accordance with, and interpreted pursuant to the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to its choice of law principles.


  


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	ClimateRock
	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	 	Name:	Per Regnarsson
	 	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer and Director


 


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:


 


	U.N. SDG SUPPORT LLC	 
	 	 
	By:	 	 
	 	Name:	Charles Ratelband	 
	 	Title:	Managing Member	 


  


[Signature page to Administrative Services Agreement]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 2, 2020

No. 04

- 18

- 00512

- CR

EX PARTE Steven ROBLES

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR1302

- W1

Honorable Catherine Torres

- Stahl, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. M a rtinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, J u s tice

Irene Rios, Justice

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Emergency Relief and to Recall Mandate is hereby DENIED.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of April, 2020

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz

, Clerk of Court
Case 1:07-cv-03317-SHS Document 6 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-10301 Summary Calendar

WESTERN OIL & GAS JV, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LLOYD PETROLEUM CORPORATION, ETC., ET AL.,

Defendants, JOHN L. GRIFFITHS, an individual,

Defendant- Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas (3:97-CV-1990-P)

January 3, 2000

Before POLITZ, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Lloyd Petroleum Corporation and John L. Griffiths appeal trial court rulings

on their claims of res judicata

, collateral estoppel and election of remed ies, and

they contend that the trial court has permitted double recovery. Our review of the

record and briefs persuades beyond peradventure that this appeal presents no2

reversible error and, accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is, in all respects,

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION



The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:



(1)

The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended October 1, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  December 21, 2006

/s/ Kenneth W. Brimmer



Chief Executive Officer





Date:  December 21, 2006

/s/ Mark Buckrey



Chief Financial Officer
onct-ex10193_738.htm



Exhibit 10.19.3

 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO

ONCTERNAL THERAPEUTICS, INC.

2021 EMPLOYMENT INDUCEMENT INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN

 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE ONCTERNAL THERAPEUTICS, INC. 2021 EMPLOYMENT INDUCEMENT INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN (this “Amendment”) is made and adopted by Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan (as defined below).

 

WHEREAS, the Company has adopted the Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc. 2021 Employment Inducement Incentive Award Plan (the “Plan”).

 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan as set forth below.

 

WHEREAS, the Board has approved this Amendment pursuant to resolutions adopted on December 16, 2021, effective immediately.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Company hereby amends the Plan as follows:

 


	
1.
	
Section 11.28 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:




 

11.28 “Overall Share Limit” means 2,800,000 Shares.

 


	
2. 
	
This Amendment is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Plan. All other terms of the 




 

Plan shall remain unchanged except as specifically modified herein. The Plan, as amended by this Amendment, is hereby ratified and confirmed.

 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Amendment was duly adopted by the Board on December 16, 2021.

 


			
	
By:
	
/s/ Chase C. Leavitt
	
 

	
Name: Chase C. Leavitt

	
Title: Secretary
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.94 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 32.1


            Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer


The undersigned, Chairman, President and Treasurer, of Jaco Electronics, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended December 31, 2005 (the "Quarterly Report") accompanying
this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods presented as required by such report. The
foregoing certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities
as principal executive officer of the Company, my own due diligence and
representations made by certain other members of the Company's senior
management.

Date:  February 14, 2006

                                      /s/ Joel H. Girsky
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      Joel H. Girsky
                                      Chairman, President and Treasurer
                                      (Principal Executive Officer)