alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
瞭解您的權利

性取向和性別認同歧視

OFCCP 保護您免遭性取向和性別認

同歧視

聯邦合約規範遵循計劃辦公室施行第 11246 號行政命

令,於修訂後禁止聯邦承包商和分包商因員工和求職者

的性取向和性別認同而歧視此等人士。 

1. OFCCP 如何定義性取向和性別認同? 

「性取向」指的是個人的身體、愛戀,及/或情感

上,是傾向於同性及/或異性。性取向的範例包括:

異性戀、女同性戀、男同性戀和雙性戀。 

「性別認同」一詞,指的是個人內在對自己性別的

感覺。這也許能對應或未能對應個人出生時之性

別,且可能會或不會向他人顯露。 

2. 性取向和性別認同歧視是? 

就業歧視通常存在於:由於您的性取向或性別認同

的關係,僱主不合理地對待身為員工或求職者的

您。歧視也存在於:僱主看似公平的政策或程序,

卻因為員工或求職者的性取向或性別認同的關係,

而對此等人士帶來重大的負面影響。 

3. 我有哪些權利?

您有權在免遭歧視的環境下工作,包括不會因為性

取向或性別認同而受到騷擾。您不能因為性取向或

性別認同,而遭遇騷擾、降級、解僱、降低薪資、

拒絕僱用,或以其他方式遭受不合理待遇。此外,

承包商不得: 

• 要求員工或求職者提供任何資訊或身分證明,是

他們未向所有其他員工或求職者要求提供的,其

中包括:與其身份認同相關的醫療資訊; 

• 拒絕員工或求職者使用與他們性別認同一致的洗

手間;

• 因為員工或求職者的性取向或性別認同而騷擾

他們; 

• 拒絕給予同性配偶與異性結婚相同之

合法結婚福利;或

• 拒絕給予同性配偶與異性公民結合相

同之合法公民結合福利。

4. OFCCP 保護哪些人? 

OFCCP 保障與聯邦政府有業務往來的

公司之員工和求職者的權利,包括銀

行、資訊科技公司、肉品包裝工廠、零

售商店、製造廠、會計事務所和建築公

司等機構的員工。 

 5

若您認為您在工作或申請工作時受到歧

視,可提出投訴。就算不確定僱主是否為

聯邦承包商或分包商,亦可提出投訴。 

6. 如何向 OFCCP 提出投訴?

 您可透過以下方式提出歧視投訴:

• 透過 OFCCP 網站填寫並提交線上表格; 

• 親自到 OFCCP 辦公室填寫表格;或 

• 將填妥的表格郵寄、傳送電 

子郵件或傳 真至負責據稱存

在的歧視發生地點的 OFCCP 

辦公室。

您可造訪網站 http://www.dol.

gov/ofccp/regs/compliance/pdf/pdfstart.htm

存取線上表格,或前往任何 OFCCP 辦公室,索

取紙本格式的表格。欲搜尋您所在地附近的辦公

室,請造訪網站:http://www.dol.gov/ofccp/

contacts/ofnation2.htm。 

填妥投訴表後請別忘了簽名。如果忘記簽

名,OFCCP 仍會受理您的投訴,但 OFCCP 調查人

員會在後續訪談時要求您補簽。欲投訴因種族、

膚色、宗教、性別、性取向、性別認同或原國籍

而遭遇的歧視,必須在據稱存在的歧視發生日起 

180 天內提出,除非因充足理由延長提起投訴的期

限。相同的 180 天期限規定也適用於聲稱因討論、

揭露或詢問薪資而遭遇的歧視。

200 CONSTITUTION AVENUE NW | WASHINGTON, DC 20210 | 電話:1-800-397-6251 | TTY: 1-877-889-5627 | www.dol.gov/ofccp
7. 僱主可否因為我提出投訴而解僱我、降我的

職,或不合理地對待我?

不可以。僱主若因您提出投訴或參與調查而報復

您,即屬違法行為。OFCCP 法規保障您不因主張自

身權利而受到騷擾、恐嚇、威脅、強迫或報復。 

8. 我可以同時向 OFCCP 和平等就業機會委員

會 / Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 

(EEOC) 提出歧視投訴嗎?

可以。如果您同時向 OFCCP 和 EEOC 提出投訴,將

由適當的機構進行調查。在某些情況下,OFCCP 和 

EEOC 可能會決定合作調查您的投訴。 

OFCCP 一般會自行處理聲稱因個人性取向或性別

認同受歧視,而對聯邦承包商提出的投訴。OFCCP 

一般會自行處理聲稱因看似已形成影響某個員工或

求職者群體的歧視模式,而對聯邦承包商提出的投

訴。此外,OFCCP 也自行處理指向個人的身障或受

保護的退伍軍人身份之歧視行為。OFCCP 一般會自

行處理聲稱因討論、透露或詢問薪酬受歧視,而對

聯邦承包商提出的投訴。 

9. 如果發現我是就業歧視的受害者,會怎麼

樣? 

您有權獲得補償,獲得未發生歧視時您本可獲得的

職位。您有權受雇、獲得晉升、復職或重新派任。

您也有權獲得欠發的薪資、未來的薪資賠償、加薪

或綜合上述各項的補償。此外,若 OFCCP 發現聯邦

承包商或分包商歧視員工或求職者,OFCCP 未來可

將其列入聯邦合約禁止或拒絕往來戶、要求取消公

司目前合約,或取消合約之修改作業。 

如需更多資訊,請洽:

the u.s. department of labor

Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs

200 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20210

1-800-397-6251

TTY:1-877-889-5627

www.dol.gov/ofccp

請注意:本資訊表提供的是一般資訊,無法取代文中所述計劃的實際

相關法律與法規。

2016 年 9 月修訂

200 CONSTITUTION AVENUE NW | WASHINGTON, DC 20210 | 電話:1-800-397-6251 | TTY: 1-877-889-5627 | www.dol.gov/ofccp
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          22,806
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,618
<INVENTORY>                                     32,605
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               173,107
<PP&E>                                          39,407
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,720
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 232,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,806
<BONDS>                                          5,693
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           405
<OTHER-SE>                                     118,868
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   232,130
<SALES>                                        216,569
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               335,094
<CGS>                                          113,761
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  286,449
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,321
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,307
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,294
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,294
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.60


</TABLE>
# Soldier Killed In Korean War Accounted For (Giovanniello)

/ Published Nov. 3, 2016

The Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) announced today that the remains of a serviceman, killed during the Korean War, have been identified and will be returned to his family for burial with full military honors.

Army Pfc. William V. Giovanniello, 22, of Brooklyn, New York, will be buried Nov. 10 in Port Jervis, New York.  On April 25, 1951, Giovanniello was a member of Company F, 2nd Battalion, 35th Infantry Regiment, 25th Infantry Division, when his unit was situated along a defensive line west of Chorw’on, South Korea, and was attacked by the Chinese People’s Volunteer Force (CPVF) and Korea People’s Army (KPA).  The unit was forced to move south of the Yongpyong River and assemble near the town of Changgo-ri.  Giovanniello’s battalion established a roadblock to cover the movement and it was during this time it was found that Giovanniello was not with his unit and was reported missing in action.  

Giovanniello’s name did not appear on any prisoner of war lists provided by the CPVF or KPA, and no repatriated American prisoners of war had information regarding Giovanniello as a prisoner of war. 

Although the U.S. Army Graves Registration Service hoped to recover American remains that remained north of the Korean Demilitarized Zone after the war, administrative details between the United Nations Command and North Korea complicated recovery efforts. An agreement was made and in September and October 1954, in what was known as Operation Glory, remains were returned. However, Giovanniello’s remains were not included and he was declared non-recoverable.

In June 1951, an unidentified set of remains, previously recovered from Yang Mun-Ni, were buried in the Tanggok United Nations Military Cemetery and labeled “Unknown X-1219.”  

In Dec. 2014, the Department of Defense approved the disinterment of “Unknown X-1219.” The remains were disinterred May 16, 2016 and were sent to the DPAA laboratory for analysis. 

To identify Giovanniello’s remains, scientists from DPAA used circumstantial and anthropological evidence, as well as dental and chest radiograph comparison analysis, which matched his records.

Today, 7,784 Americans remain unaccounted for from the Korean War. Using advances in technology, identifications continue to be made from remains that were previously turned over by North Korean officials or recovered by American teams.

For additional information on the Defense Department’s mission to account for Americans who went missing while serving our country, visit the DPAA website at www.dpaa.mil, find us on social media at www.facebook.com/dodpaa or call (703) 699-1420.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 220 (Wednesday, November 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69579-69580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22683]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the

[[Page 69580]]

provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel, NIH-NIBIB P01-J3 Review 
Meeting.
    Date: November 18, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Park Hotel, 840 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Prabha L. Atreya, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Biomedical Imaging, and Bioengineering, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
496-8633, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91f0e5e3f4e8f0e1e3d1fcf0f8fdbffff8f9bff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d9b8adabbca0b8a9ab99b4b8b0b5f7b7b0b1f7beb6af">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel, NIBIB-R13 Conference Review 
Meeting.
    Date: December 7, 2005.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: II Democracy Plaza, Dem. II, 6707 Democracy Blvd. 223, 
Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Bonnie Dunn, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 
920, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-8633, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e6829388888489a68b878f8ac8888f8ec8818990"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0460716a6a666b4469656d682a6a6d6c2a636b72">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 7, 2005.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-22683 Filed 11-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<Page>




                                   EXHIBIT 12

           INTERNATIONAL MULTIFOODS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

             Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                   (unaudited)

                                 (in thousands)

<Table>
<Caption>

                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED      SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                      ------------------     ------------------
                                      Sept. 1,   Aug. 26,    Sept. 1,   Aug. 26,
                                         2001       2000        2001       2000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                   <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>
Earnings before income taxes          $ 4,506    $13,458     $ 7,871    $21,119
Plus: Fixed charges (1)                 6,696      6,554      13,332     12,915
Less: capitalized interest               (100)      (111)       (254)      (342)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings available to cover
   fixed charges                      $11,102    $19,901     $20,949    $33,692
===============================================================================


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges       1.66       3.04        1.57       2.61
===============================================================================

</Table>

(1) Fixed charges consisted of the following:

<Table>
<Caption>

                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED      SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                      ------------------     -------------------
                                      Sept. 1,   Aug. 26,    Sept. 1,   Aug. 26,
                                         2001       2000        2001       2000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                   <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>
Interest expense, gross                $4,131     $4,468     $ 8,290    $ 8,675
Rentals (Interest factor)               2,565      2,086       5,042      4,240
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Total fixed charges                 $6,696     $6,554     $13,332    $12,915
===============================================================================

</Table>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999,
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          88,513
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  274,834<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,066
<INVENTORY>                                     35,918
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               411,943
<PP&E>                                         309,126
<DEPRECIATION>                                 214,219
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 584,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          243,636
<BONDS>                                         51,379
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,736
<OTHER-SE>                                     270,964
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   584,944
<SALES>                                        623,451
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               914,880
<CGS>                                          436,254
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  624,945
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               357,375<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,900<F3>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (73,061)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (78,561)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   6,984
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (71,577)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.46)
<FN>
<F1>Accounts receivable in the Consolidated Balance Sheet is shown net of
allowances for doubtful accounts.
<F2>Other expenses include Product development expenses, Sales and marketing
expenses, General and administrative expenses, and Nonrecurring operating
charges.
<F3>The provision for doubtful accounts is included in Other expenses above.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# As China ties warm, US military resumes search to bring fallen heroes home

/ Published Feb. 12, 2024

The US military has completed two site surveys to recover World War II remains in China, the first in the country in nearly five years, in the latest effort to honour the legacy of Sino-American military cooperation eight decades ago.

A team with the US Defence POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) "spent several weeks surveying sites in southern China in order to provide vital information for future recovery missions", the agency said on its website last week.

For the full article, please click the link.
#### NORMAN H. BUTLER and MARY BUTLER, Appellants, v. LAHONTAN VALLEY NEWS, Respondent.

No. 7550

June 27, 1975

537 P.2d 320

[Rehearing denied July 25,1975]

*Seymour H. Patt,*Reno, for Appellants.

*Diehl, Recanzone, Evans & Smart,*Fallon, for Respondent.

*422OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

In 1973, respondent newspaper petitioned the district court to declare it qualified to publish legal notices or advertisements within Churchill County, pursuant to NRS Chapter 238. Appellants, owners of a competing newspaper, intervened alleging that respondent did not meet the statutory qualifications for publication of legal notices within the county. After a contested hearing, the district court declared respondent “a newspaper of general circulation within the purview of chapter 238, NRS; that by virtue thereof, said publication is fully competent to contain and publish all forms of legal notices and/or advertisements as may be required by law.”

NRS Chapter 238 delineates four requirements that a weekly newspaper must fulfill in order to be considered a newspaper of general circulation competent to publish legal notices and advertisements: (1) it must have a valid second-class mail permit; (2) it must be a newspaper of general circulation; (3) it must be published within the county for 104 consecutive weeks; and (4) it must be printed in whole or in part in the county in which the legal notice is required to be published.

Respondent’s compliance with the first three requirements is not challenged. Appellants’ sole contention is that the lower court erred in determining the Lahontan Valley News is “printed in whole or in part” in Churchill County, as required by NRS 238.030(1). We cannot agree.

Appellants argue that NRS 238.030(1) requires the actual duplication process be completed in whole or in part within Churchill County and since the Lahontan Valley News is duplicated in Sparks, it does not qualify. Appellants’ interpretation of the word printed would in the context of this statute be both unreasonable and unrelated to the objective of statutes such as NRS Chapter 238, that being, to require public notices to be published so as fairly to express them to the particular community intended to be reached. In re Lefavor, 169 P. 412 (Cal. 1917).

According to the record, the office of the respondent newspaper is located in Fallon, where some of the typesetting, some work on headlines and pictures, and preparation of the page layouts used for duplication takes place. From the testimony, *423we think the trial court could properly determine that the processes performed in Fallon, in their totality, constituted a substantial and integral part of the “printing.” Thus, the Lahontan Valley News is “printed in whole or in part” within Churchill County. Cf. Ruble v. Redden, 517 P.2d 1124 (Okl. 1973), which holds that a more restrictive interpretation would render a similar statute unconstitutional.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Recent News & Stories             
  -  News Releases             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

-  FIRST 
-   
-   
- 1
- 2 (current)
- 3
- 4
- 5
-   
-   
-  LAST
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David HERNANDEZ-BALVANA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-50805.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided April 20, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Alfred Van Sumpter, Law Office of Alfred V. Sumpter, Del Rio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, David Hernandez-Balvana raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.