alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Soldier Accounted for from WWII (Hartwick, E.)

/ Published Feb. 12, 2024
WASHINGTON, 
The Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) announced today that U.S. Army Tech. 4th Grade (TECH4) Elmo F. Hartwick, 38, of Onaga, Kansas, killed during World War II, was accounted for Aug. 21, 2023.

In June 1944, Hartwick was assigned to Company C, 149th Engineer Combat Battalion in the European Theater. On June 6, Hartwick was aboard Landing Craft Infantry (Large) 92, along with roughly 200 other servicemembers, enroute to land on Omaha Beach, in Normandy, France. As LCI-92 steamed toward the shore, it struck an underwater mine which caused the craft to burst into flames. The craft was also hit by enemy artillery fire, causing an explosion that ignited the ships fuel stores and instantly killed everyone in the troop compartment. Due to the urgency of the situation, it was impossible for others to search for survivors. Hartwick’s remains were not accounted for after the war.

Around June 10, members of the 500th Medical Collecting Company examined the wreckage of LCI-92 and noted the burnt remains of servicemen in the troop compartment, where Hartwick and others were last seen. American Graves Registration Command (AGRC), the organization that searched for and recovered fallen American personnel in the European Theater, removed small amounts of remains from LCI-92 and buried them in the United States Military Cemetery (USMC) St. Laurent-sur-Mer.

Beginning in 1946, AGRC analyzed the remains found in LCI-92, segregating them into four separate Unknowns (X-53, X-83, X-83B, and X-83C). Despite their efforts, AGRC were unable to identify the Unknowns at the time and they were interred in Normandy American Cemetery, an American Battle Monuments Commission site in Normandy, France.

In June and August 2021, the Department of Defense and ABMC officials exhumed the comingled remains of the four Unknowns and transferred them to the DPAA Laboratory for analysis.

To identify Hartwick’s remains, scientists from DPAA used anthropological analysis. Additionally, scientists from the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System used mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) analysis.

Hartwick’s name is recorded on the Walls of the Missing at Normandy American Cemetery in Colleville-sur-Mer, France, along with others still missing from WWII. A rosette will be placed next to his name to indicate he has been accounted for.

TECH4 Hartwick will be buried in Onaga, Kansas, on a date to be determined.

For family and funeral information, contact the Army Casualty Office at (800) 892-2490.

For additional information on the Defense Department’s mission to account for Americans who went missing while serving our country, visit the DPAA website at www.dpaa.mil or find us on social media at www.facebook.com/dodpaa or https://www.linkedin.com/company/defense-pow-mia-accounting-agency.

Hartwick’s personnel profile can be viewed at  https://dpaa-mil.sites.crmforce.mil/dpaaProfile?id=a0Jt0000000XmAbEAK.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                                November 11, 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q by Kaiser Aluminum &
Chemical Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for the period
ending September 30, 2002 (the "Report"), as filed on the date hereof with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the undersigned, John T. La Duc, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to such officer's knowledge:

      (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
           78o(d)); and

      (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
           Report.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of
the date first above written.

                                                     /s/ John T. La Duc
                                                     John T. La Duc
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
```
Case 1:07-cv-03286-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03286-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 2 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03286-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 3 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03286-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 4 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03286-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 5 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03286-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03286-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03286-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 8 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03286-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 9 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03286-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 10 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03286-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:07-cv-03286-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 12 of 12
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)

I, Philip Kives, certify that:

1.               I have reviewed this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 of K-tel International, Inc.;

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

a.               Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b.              Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c.               Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a.               All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.              Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 14, 2007
|   | /s/ Philip Kives                       |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Philip Kives                           |
|   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1406 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1406

   To revise the boundaries of a unit of the John H. Chafee Coastal 
  Barrier Resources System in Topsail, North Carolina, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 9, 2019

 Mr. Tillis (for himself and Mr. Burr) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To revise the boundaries of a unit of the John H. Chafee Coastal 
  Barrier Resources System in Topsail, North Carolina, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORRECTION TO MAP.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall make such corrections 
to the map described in subsection (b) as are necessary to exclude lots 
from unit L06 of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System in 
North Topsail Beach, North Carolina, that were serviced by 
infrastructure, as described in subsection (c), installed along North 
Carolina Highway 210 and New River Inlet Road as of the date of 
enactment of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3501 et 
seq.).
    (b) Maps Described.--The map referred to in subsection (a) is a map 
that--
            (1) is included in a set of maps as part of the John H. 
        Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System entitled ``John H. 
        Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System'' and dated December 
        21, 2018; and
            (2) relates to unit L06 of the John H. Chafee Coastal 
        Barrier Resources System.
    (c) Infrastructure Described.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the 
        infrastructure referred to in subsection (a) is infrastructure 
        that meets the criteria described in section 4(g)(1)(B) of the 
        Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(g)(1)(B)).
            (2) Inclusion.--For purposes of paragraph (1), North 
        Carolina Highway 210 and New River Inlet Road shall be 
        considered to meet the criteria described in section 
        4(g)(1)(B)(i) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 
        3503(g)(1)(B)(i)).
                                 <all>
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5525 

To terminate the moratorium on deepwater drilling issued by the Secretary 

of the Interior. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2010 

Mr. OLSON (for himself, Mr. PENCE, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. MCCAUL, 

Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. POE of 

Texas, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. HARPER, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. 

MELANCON, Mr. PAUL, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. SHADEGG, 

and Mr. CASSIDY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To terminate the moratorium on deepwater drilling issued 

by the Secretary of the Interior. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF MORATORIUM ON DEEP4 WATER DRILLING. 

5 The moratorium set forth in the Minerals Manage6 ment Service Notice to Lessees No. 2010–N04, dated May 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5525 IH

1 30, 2010, and any suspension of operations issued in con2 nection with the moratorium, shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EX-10.25




 Exhibit 10.25 

SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS 

Independent non-employee directors of Mastech Digital, Inc. (the “Company”) will receive an
annual retainer fee of $65,000 in 2022, other than the Chair of the Audit Committee who will receive an annual retainer fee of $69,000 in 2022. In addition, independent non-employee directors of the Company
are eligible to participate in the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Stock Incentive Plan”). On January 30, 2022, our independent non-employee directors each received a
restricted share grant under the Stock Incentive Plan of 3,768 restricted shares, which shares vest over a one-year period. 

Non-independent directors of the Company will not receive any compensation for their service as
directors of the Company. 
 All of the Company’s directors are reimbursed for reasonable travel expenses incurred in connection with
attending Board of Directors and committee meetings.
Case 1:07-cv-03310-LLS Document 6 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03310-LLS Document 6 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03310-LLS Document 6 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03310-LLS Document 6 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03310-LLS Document 6 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03310-LLS Document 6 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 6 of 6
#### STATE v. PITTS

No. 20 PC.

Case below: 10 N.C. App. 355.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 April 1971.
#### SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, Appellant, v. NICHOLAS FRED KRAVETZ, Respondent.

No. 12720

December 29, 1980

620 P.2d 868

*Richard H. Bryan,*Attorney General, Carson City; *Robert J. Miller,*District Attorney, and *Gregory C. Diamond,*Deputy District Attorney, Las Vegas, for Appellant.

*Morgan D. Harris,*Public Defender, and *Robert H. Thompson,*Deputy Public Defender, Clark County, for Respondent.

*920OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

On June 10, 1980, respondent filed a pretrial petition for a writ of habeas corpus upon the ground that there was insufficient evidence presented during the preliminary hearing to support a finding that the alleged offense was committed in Clark County, Nevada. On June 27, 1980, the district court granted the petition and the state has appealed.

A review of the preliminary hearing transcript reveals testimony that the alleged crime occurred “at the parking lot of the Safeway store at Tropicana and Maryland Parkway.” Beyond question, this intersection is located in Clark County, Nevada, a matter of common knowledge to any one at all familiar with Las Vegas, Nevada. This fact, not reasonably open to dispute, should be judicially noticed. Ex Rel. Blake v. County Commissioners, 48 Nev. 299, 231 Pac. 384 (1924) (Sanders, J., concurring opinion); NRS 47.130. Therefore, this court takes judicial notice of the fact that the aforementioned intersection is situated within Clark County, Nevada. *See, e.g.,*Duran v. Mueller, 79 Nev. 453, 386 P.2d 733 (1963); Kramer v. State, 60 Nev. 262, 108 P.2d 304 (1940); Crayne v. Crayne, 54 Nev. 205, 13 P.2d 222 (1932).

Consequently, we find that the evidence presented at the preliminary hearing was sufficient to support a finding that the alleged offense was committed within the jurisdiction of the lower court. Accordingly, the district court’s order granting respondent’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is reversed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymundo ALCALA-CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 04-51157, 04-51159.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided April 20, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Philip J. Lynch, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Raymundo Aleala-Chavez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350*596(1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *596published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Sarah RAMIREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-15438.

D.C. No. CV-03-00930-VRW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 2005.*

Decided April 4, 2005.

Sarah Ramirez, Fresno, CA, pro se.

Before B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Sarah Ramirez appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of her action for failure to serve the summons and complaint. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, *Oyama v. Sheehan (In re Sheehan),*253 F.3d 507, 511 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the action for failure to serve. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). The district court informed Ramirez that she was required to serve the summons and complaint on the defendant and such service was long overdue. Yet, she failed to file a *178proof of service and failed to appear at the next case management conference.

Ramirez’s contentions are without merit.

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### McEACHERN v. MILLER

No. 64 PC.

Case below: 6 N.C. App. 42.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 18 November 1969.
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
of CEO and CFO Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kansas City
Power & Light Company (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), Michael J. Chesser, as Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Terry Bassham, as Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Michael J. ChesserName:
              Title:
            Michael
      J. Chesser
              Chairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
            November
      7, 2008/s/
      Terry BasshamName:
              Title:
            Terry
      Bassham
              Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:
            November
      7, 2008





This
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.  This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to
liability under that section.  This certification shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 except to the extent this Exhibit 32.2 is
expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such
filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Kansas City Power & Light Company
and will be retained by Kansas City Power & Light Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 32.2


            Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer


The undersigned, Executive Vice President, Finance and Secretary, of Jaco
Electronics, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of the Company for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2005 (the "Quarterly
Report") accompanying this certification fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the dates and for the periods presented as required by such
report. The foregoing certification is based upon, among other things, my
responsibilities as principal financial officer of the Company, my own due
diligence and representations made by certain other members of the Company's
senior management.


Date:  February 14, 2006

                        /s/ Jeffrey D. Gash
                         ----------------------------------------
                         Jeffrey D. Gash
                         Executive Vice President,
                         Finance and Secretary
                        (Principal Financial Officer)
# L_2008011EN.01002301.xml

| 15.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 11/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 11/23

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1359/2007 of 21 November 2007 laying down the conditions for granting special export refunds on certain cuts of boned meat of bovine animals (Codified version)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 304 of 22 November 2007
  )

On page 25, Annex 1, under point 8 ‘Certificate of Issuing Authority’ should read as follows:

for:

‘The undersigned hereby declares that the meat described hereon comes from the forequarters of adult male cattle.’,

read:

‘The undersigned hereby declares that the meat described herein comes from the hindquarters of adult male cattle.’.

---