67432 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 214 / Monday, November 7, 2005 / Notices 

of trade adjustment. Nevertheless, we 

considered whether home market sales 

were at a more advanced LOT than the 

CEP sales, thus warranting a CEP offset 

under section 773(a)(7)(B) of the Act. In 

order to determine whether NV is at a 

more advanced LOT than the CEP 

transactions, the Department compared 

home market selling activities with 

those for CEP transactions after 

deducting the expenses identified in 

section 772(d) of the Act. After making 

these deductions, the Department 

determined that the differences between 

the home and U.S. market selling 

activities support a finding that DSM’s 

sales in the home market were at a more 

advanced LOT than the CEP sales. See 

Memorandum from Malcolm Burke to 

the File, concerning Level of Trade and 

CEP Offset Analysis, dated concurrently 

with this notice. Thus, in calculating 

NV, we reduced DSM’s home market 

sales prices in accordance with the CEP 

offset provision. 

Currency Conversion 

Pursuant to section 773A(a) of the 

Act, we converted amounts expressed in 

foreign currencies into U.S. dollar 

amounts based on the exchange rates in 

effect on the dates of the relevant U.S. 

sales, as certified by the Federal Reserve 

Bank. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

As a result of this review, we 

preliminarily determine that the 

following weighted- average dumping 

margin exists for the period February 1, 

2004, through January 31, 2005: 

Manufacturer/Exporter Margin (percent) 

Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., 

Ltd. ............................ 0.51 

Public Comment 

Within 10 days of publicly 

announcing the preliminary results of 

this review, we will disclose, to 

interested parties, any calculations 

performed in connection with the 

preliminary results. See 19 CFR 

§ 351.224(b). Any interested party may 

request a hearing within 30 days of the 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. See 19 CFR § 351.310(c). If 

requested, a hearing will be held 44 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register, or the 

first workday thereafter. Interested 

parties are invited to comment on the 

preliminary results of this review. The 

Department will consider case briefs 

filed by interested parties within 30 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register. Also, 

interested parties may file rebuttal 

briefs, limited to issues raised in the 

case briefs. The Department will 

consider rebuttal briefs filed not later 

than five days after the time limit for 

filing case briefs. Parties who submit 

arguments are requested to submit with 

each argument: (1) a statement of the 

issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and, (3) a table of authorities 

cited. Further, the Department requests 

that parties submitting written 

comments provide the Department with 

a diskette containing the public version 

of those comments. Unless the deadline 

for issuing the final results of review is 

extended, the Department will issue the 

final results of this administrative 

review, including the results of its 

analysis of issues raised in the written 

comments, within 120 days of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. 

Assessment Rates 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

§ 351.212(b)(1), in these preliminary 

results of review we calculated 

importer–specific assessment rates for 

DSM’s subject merchandise. Within 15 

days of publication of the final results 

of review, the Department will issue 

instructions to CBP directing it to assess 

the final importer–specific assessment 

rates (if above de minimis) uniformly on 

the entered value of all entries of subject 

merchandise made by the relevant 

importer during the POR. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(1) of the Act. In the 

instant matter: (1) the cash deposit rate 

for the reviewed company will be the 

rate established in the final results of 

this review (except that if that rate is de 

minimis, i.e., less than 0.5 percent, no 

cash deposit will be required); (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed 

companies not listed above, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company–specific rate published for the 

most recent period; (3) if the exporter is 

not a firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the less–than-fair–value 

(LTFV) investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent period for the manufacturer of 

the subject merchandise; and (4) the 

cash deposit rate for all other 

manufacturers or exporters will 

continue to be the ‘‘all others’’ rate of 

0.98 percent, which is the ‘‘all others’’

rate established in the LTFV 

investigation, adjusted for the export 

subsidy rate in the companion 

countervailingduty investigation. These 

cash deposit rates, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until publication of the 

final results of the next administrative 

review. See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

§ 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of the antidumping 

duties occurred and the concomitant 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: October 31, 2005. 

Joseph A. Spetrini, 

Acting Assistant Secretaryfor Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 05–22137 Filed 11–4–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(A–357–802, A–583–803) 

Light–Walled Welded Rectangular 

Carbon Steel Tubing from Argentina 

and Taiwan; Final Results of the 

Expedited Sunset Reviews of the 

Antidumping Duty Orders 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 1, 2005, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated the second sunset 

reviews of the antidumping duty orders 

on light–walled welded rectangular 

carbon steel tubing from Argentina and 

Taiwan pursuant to section 751(c) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

On the basis of a notice of intent to 

participate and adequate substantive 

responses filed on behalf of domestic 

interested parties and no responses from 

respondent interested parties, the 

Department conducted expedited (120- 

day) sunset reviews. See section 

751(c)(3)(B) of the Act. As a result of 

these sunset reviews, the Department 

finds that revocation of the antidumping 

duty orders would lead (or likely lead) 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 214 / Monday, November 7, 2005 / Notices 67433 

to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping at the levels listed in the 

‘‘Final Results of Reviews’’ section 

below. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 7, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zev 

Primor or Edythe Artman, AD/CVD 

Enforcement 5, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street & Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4114 or (202) 482–3931. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background: 

On July 1, 2005, the Department 

initiated the second sunset reviews of 

the antidumping duty orders on light–

walled welded rectangular carbon steel 

tubing from Argentina and Taiwan 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. 

See Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Reviews, 70 FR 38101 (July 1, 2005). 

The Department received a notice of 

intent to participate from Allied Tube 

and Conduit, Hannibal Industries, 

Leavitt Tube Company, Northwest Pipe 

Company, Searing Industries, and 

Western Tube and Conduit (collectively 

the domestic interested parties) within 

the deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i) pertaining to sunset 

reviews. The domestic interested parties 

claimed interested–party status under 

section 771(9)(C) of the Act as 

manufacturers of a domestic like 

product in the United States. We 

received complete substantive responses 

from the domestic interested parties 

within the 30-day deadline specified in 

19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). We received no 

responses from the respondent 

interested parties. As a result, pursuant 

to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the 

Department has conducted expedited 

(120-day) sunset reviews of these orders. 

Scope of the Orders: 

The product covered by these orders 

is light–walled welded carbon steel 

pipes and tubes of rectangular 

(including square) cross-section having 

a wall thickness of less than 0.156 inch. 

This merchandise is classified under 

item number 7306.60.50.00 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States. It was formerly classified 

under item number 610.4928 of the 

Tariff Schedules of the United States. 

Analysis of Comments Received: 

All issues raised in these reviews are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum from Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, to Joseph A. Spetrini, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, dated October 31, 2005, 

which is hereby adopted by this notice. 

The issues discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum include the 

likelihood of continuation or recurrence 

of dumping and the magnitude of the 

margins likely to prevail if the orders 

were to be revoked. Parties can find a 

complete discussion of all issues raised 

in these reviews and the corresponding 

recommendations in this public 

memorandum which is on file in room 

B–099 of the main Commerce building. 

In addition, a complete version of the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly on the Web at 

http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy 

and electronic version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Final Results of Reviews: 

We determine that revocation of the 

antidumping duty orders on light–

walled welded rectangular carbon steel 

tubing from Argentina and Taiwan 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of dumping at the 

following weighted–average percentage 

margins: 

Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers 

Weighted–

Average 

Margin 

(percent) 

Argentina.

All Manufacturers/Producers/Exporters ..................................... 56.26 

Taiwan.

Ornatube Enterprise ................... 5.51 

Vulcan Industrial Corp. ............... 40.97 

Yieh Hsing Industries, Ltd. ......... 40.97 

All Other Manufacturers/Producers/Exporters ..................... 29.15 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective orders (APO) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective orders 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: October 31, 2005. 

Joseph A. Spetrini, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 05–22152 Filed 11–4–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Paper Clips from the People’s Republic 

of China; Notice of Final Results of 

Expedited Sunset Review of 

Antidumping Duty Order 

A–570–826 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 1, 2005, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) initiated the sunset 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on paper clips from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘China’’). See 

Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Reviews, 70 FR 38101 (July 1, 2005). On 

the basis of Notices of Intent to 

Participate, adequate substantive 

responses filed on behalf of domestic 

interested parties, and a lack of response 

from respondent interested parties, the 

Department conducted an expedited 

(120-day) sunset review. As a result of 

this sunset review, the Department finds 

that revocation of the antidumping duty 

order would likely lead to the 

continuation or recurrence of dumping. 

The dumping margins are identified in 

the Final Results of Review section of 

this notice. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 7, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Hilary Sadler, Esq. or Maureen 

Flannery, AD/CVD Operations, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street & Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4340 or (202) 482–3020, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 1, 2005, the Department 

published the notice of initiation of the 

sunset review of the antidumping duty 

order on paper clips from China 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). 

See Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Reviews, 70 FR 38101 (July 1, 2005). On 

July 11, 2005 and July 16, 2005, the 

Department received a Notice of Intent 

to Participate from Officemate 

International Corporation and ACCO 

Brands, Inc., the domestic interested