alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2011170DE.01004302.xml

| 30.6.2011 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 170/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2011

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 170/43

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1451/2007 der Kommission vom 4. Dezember 2007 über die zweite Phase des Zehn-Jahres-Arbeitsprogramms gemäß Artikel 16 Absatz 2 der Richtlinie 98/8/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über das Inverkehrbringen von Biozid-Produkten

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 325 vom 11. Dezember 2007
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 325 vom 11. Dezember 2007

In Anhang I, Seite 23, und in Anhang II, Seite 47:

anstatt:

„Natriumhypochlorid“

muss es heißen:

„Natriumhypochlorit“.

---
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 144 

To designate the mountain at the Devils Tower National Monument, 

Wyoming, as Devils Tower, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 16, 2019 

Mr. ENZI (for himself and Mr. BARRASSO) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To designate the mountain at the Devils Tower National 

Monument, Wyoming, as Devils Tower, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF DEVILS TOWER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The mountain at the Devils 

5 Tower National Monument, Wyoming, located at 

6 44°35′26′′N, by 104°42′55′′W, and the area located at 

7 44°35′21′′N, by 104°41′48′′W, shall be known and des8 ignated as ‘‘Devils Tower’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 144 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, map, 

2 regulation, order, document, paper, or other record of the 

3 United States to the mountain and area described in sub4 section (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to ‘‘Devils 

5 Tower’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
July 14, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KINGS HIGH RANCH, L. L.C. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00514

- CV V.
ULTIMATE KOBE BEEF, L.L.C., ALLIS ON MAE GODWIN AND BR UCE R. HEMMINGSEN , Appellee s

________________________________ Today the Court heard the parties ’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on October 3, 2014. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal. We further order that mandate be issued immediately. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 219 (Tuesday, November 15, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 69350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22623]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
NMNM 9023

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Section 371(a) of the Energy Policy 
Act of 2005, the lessee(s), Anderson Oil Ltd., John M. Beard Trust, and 
Patina Oklahoma Corp., timely filed a petition for reinstatement of oil 
and gas lease NMNM 9023 in Lea County, NM. The lessee paid the required 
rental accruing from the date of termination, March 1, 2003. No leases 
were issued that affect these lands. The lessee agrees to the new lease 
terms for rentals and royalties of $5 per acre and 16\2/3\ percent or 4 
percentages above the existing competitive royalty rate. The lessee 
paid the $500 administration fee for the reinstatement of the lease and 
$166 cost for publishing this Notice.
    The lessee met the requirements for reinstatement of the lease per 
Sec. 31(e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188(e)). We 
are proposing to reinstate the lease, effective the date of termination 
subject to:
    <bullet> The original terms and conditions of the lease;
    <bullet> The increased rental of $5 per acre;
    <bullet> The increased royalty of 16\2/3\ percent or 4 percentages 
above the existing competitive royalty rate; and
    <bullet> The $166 cost of publishing this Notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lourdes B. Ortiz, BLM, New Mexico 
State Office, (505) 438-7586.

    Dated: October 27, 2005.
Lourdes B. Ortiz,
Land Law Examiner.
[FR Doc. 05-22623 Filed 11-14-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
| **Fixed                  ChargeCoverage Ratio**  | **ABR                  Spread**  | **Eurodollar                  Spread**  | **Commitment                  Fee**  |
|-------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| ³                  1.75x                    | 0.25%                            | 1.75%                                   | 0.25%                                |
| ³                  1.50x but < 1.75x     | 0.50%                            | 2.00%                                   | 0.25%                                |
| ³                  1.25x but < 1.50x     | 0.75%                            | 2.25%                                   | 0.25%                                |
| <                  1.25x                      | 1.00%                            | 2.50%                                   | 0.375%                               |

³        1.75x

**[SIGNATURE        PAGE FOLLOWS]**

**THE      CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC.**

** **

**JACO      ELECTRONICS, INC.**

**INTERFACE      ELECTRONICS      CORP.**

**BANK      OF AMERICA, N.A.,**

**THE      CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC.**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FOR 10-Q FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           443,608
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                            4,658
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                              4,439
<EQUITIES>                                       2,594
<MORTGAGE>                                      11,055
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   48,525
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 658,476
<CASH>                                           3,257
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              13,617
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          28,032
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,276,122
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                123,394
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              8,718
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 523,609
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            5,509
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 20,364
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,175
<OTHER-SE>                                     118,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,276,122
<PREMIUMS>                                       4,760
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             29,081
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   1,197
<BENEFITS>                                      18,327
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      1,079
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             7,977
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,679
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,037
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,642
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,642
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.13
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# L_2007179EN.01005601.xml

| 7.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 179/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 179/56

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 275/2007 of 15 March 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 1825/2000 laying down detailed rules for the application of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the labelling of beef and beef products

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 76 of 16 March 2007
  )

On page 15, in Article 1 (4) of Regulation (EC) No 275/2007, in the second sentence of the second subparagraph of paragraph 2 of the Article 5c inserted into Regulation (EC) No 1825/2000:

for:

‘Information shall be displayed in the sale outlet by such meats so as to allow the final consumer to distinguish easily between meat from different origins.’,

read:

‘Information shall be displayed in the sale outlet near such meats so as to allow the final consumer to distinguish easily between meat from different origins.’.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

Order 

September 9, 2010 

140960 

RON DEXTROM, KEVIN HEITGER, CORY 

DANFORD, AIMEE DANFORD, BARBARA 

HOFSTRA, JACK KIMBLE, ROBERT JAMES 

LOHMAN, STEVEN MCCORMICK, MARK 

MCGUCKIN, DIANE MCGUCKIN, WILLIAM 

MEAD, SHIRLEY MEAD, LAURA SMITH, 

EDWARD BRICKHEIMER, NORMA 

BRICKHEIMER, JUSTIN PAQUETTE, 

TAMARA PAQUETTE, GERALD K. 

ROOT, JANICE M. ROOT, KENNETH 

BOISSEAU, CHRISTINE BOISSEAU, 

DAVID E. JOHNSON, KARIN U. JOHNSON, 

DANIEL P. BIRGY, DOREEN MARIE 

BIRGY, ERIC BIRDSALL, JUDITH BIRDSALL, 

RICHARD ANSTETT, BARBARA ANSTETT, 

HAL HAGADORN, BARBARA HAGADORN, 

SUZANNE BOERMA, PHILIP BOERMA, 

JR., CARL A. PHILLIPS, TINA C. PHILLIPS, 

CHARLES MCGAHA, JOYCE MCGAHA, 

RITA MCNAMARA, JONATHON BENNETT, 

DANIEL A. SUTTON, BEVERLY J. SUTTON, 

KIMBERLY SULLIVAN, LINDA MOHLER, 

WALTER MOHLER, GUY MOCABY, 

JILL MOCABY, LARRY WASHBURN, 

DEBORAH WASHBURN, RICHARD A. 

PILON, SALLY E. PILON, JONATHON PIKE, 

TERRY SUMMERLEE, BECKY SUMMERLEE, 

RAMEY ROOSE, and LAURA S. HEITGER, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

and SC: 140960 

 COA: 281020 

Wexford CC: 06-019912-CE 

TONY CASSONE, DONOTA CASSONE, 

ROGER GRAMES, ELIZABETH ANN 

GRAMES, JOEL M. YONKMAN, REBECCA 

F. YONKMAN, CRAIG HANEY, JILL 

HANEY, JOHNA A. WINCHESTER, DOREEN 

M. WINCHESTER, SABRINA C. LESTER, 

ANTHONY VANHEE, MARGARET VANHEE, 

MARIANNE ALLISON HOWES, DONALD 

BIGGER, SCOTT HARANDA, MATTHEW J. 
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 9, 2010 

p0830 

 

2

CLARK, BETTY L. CLARK, JOE F. BURLSON, 

CHERYL N. BURLSON, MICHAEL B. JONES, 

BRIAN SULLIVAN, ROBERT BLACKLEDGE, 

RACHELLE BLACKLEDGE, PAUL E. 

CONNER, TERRY L. CONNER, ALBERT 

WILLIAMS, and FRANCES WILLIAMS, 

 Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v 

WEXFORD COUNTY, WEXFORD COUNTY 

LANDFILL, and WEXFORD COUNTY 

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, 

 Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

DAVIS, J., not participating. I recuse myself and am not participating because I 

was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
#### FORTE v. PAPER CO.

No. 67 PC.

Case below: 35 N.C. App. 340.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 May 1978.
#### STATE v. ENGLE

No. 74 PC.

Case below: 5 N.C. App. 101.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 18 November 1969.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                             455
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      229
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,972
<PP&E>                                           4,760
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,618)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,217
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         8,399
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,692
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (35,082)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,496
<SALES>                                         10,401
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,401
<CGS>                                            5,320
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,320
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,125
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,734
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,666)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,666)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,666)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-50418

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAUL FRIAS-TRUJILLO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:09-CR-2804-1

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The attorney appointed to represent Defendant-Appellant Raul FriasTrujillo (Frias) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Frias has filed a

response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this

time of Frias’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; such claims generally

“cannot be resolved on direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the

district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 9, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-50418 Document: 00511405220 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/09/2011
No. 10-50418

the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006)

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Included in Frias’s response is a pro se motion to file a pro se appellate

brief. This motion is unauthorized and untimely; accordingly, it is DENIED.

See United States v. Ogbonna, 184 F.3d 447, 449 & n.1 (5th Cir. 1999); United

States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Frias’s response

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 10-50418 Document: 00511405220 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/09/2011
#### STATE v. HENSLEY

No. 125 PC.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 8.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 June 1976.
Exhibit 3  NAVISTAR FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES  ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BY-LAWS  The following documents of Navistar Financial Corporation are incorporated herein by reference:   3.1
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Navistar Financial Corporation (as amended and in effect on December 15, 1987). Filed on Form 8-K dated December 17, 1987. Commission File No. 001-04146.  3.2
The By-Laws of Navistar Financial Corporation (as amended February 29, 1988). Filed on Form 10-K dated January 19, 1989. Commission File No. 001-04146.  3.3
Amendment to the By-Laws of Navistar Financial Corporation. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 on Form 10-K dated December 18, 2003. Commission File No. 001-04146.    E-1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>          SEP-30-1997

<CASH>                       5,357,355 
<SECURITIES>                      0    
<RECEIVABLES>                  352,657 
<ALLOWANCES>                      0    
<INVENTORY>                       0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             5,710,012 
<PP&E>                       4,851,001 
<DEPRECIATION>                    0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>              10,787,693 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          812,377 
<BONDS>                      1,998,330 
<COMMON>                          0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0    
<PREFERRED>                       0    
<OTHER-SE>                   5,764,680 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>10,787,693 
<SALES>                      2,173,214 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             2,341,139 
<CGS>                             0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                1,442,548 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               126,188 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             199,245 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                573,158 
<INCOME-TAX>                      0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            347,765 
<DISCONTINUED>                    0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0    
<CHANGES>                         0    
<NET-INCOME>                   347,765 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    17.04 
<EPS-DILUTED>                    17.04 
        


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 MERCURY AIR GROUP, INC CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 CERTIFICATION I, Robert Schlax, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on SEC Form 10-Q of Mercury Air
Group, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, nor misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have; a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c. disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrants internal controls over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing similar functions); a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. /s/ Robert SchlaxRobert SchlaxChief Financial Officer
 November 12, 2004 29
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 30, 2013

p0923

Order 

Clerk

September 30, 2013

147118

UNITED FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147118

COA: 309356

Berrien CC: 2011-000342-CZ

HUGH O. TAPP,

Defendant,

and 

KATHERINE M. TAPP,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 14, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Terri Dickerson, Press and Communications (202) 376-8582.

Kenneth L. Marcus,

Staff Director, Acting General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 05-22573 Filed 11-8-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-M