alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1405 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1405

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the credit for 
                      production of refined coal.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 9, 2019

  Mr. Daines (for himself, Mr. Cramer, Mrs. Capito, and Mr. Gardner) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the credit for 
                      production of refined coal.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF REFINED COAL PRODUCTION TAX CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 45(e)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``10-year period'' 
        each place it appears and inserting ``12-year period'', and
            (2) in subparagraph (D)(ii)(II), by striking ``10-year 
        period'' and inserting ``12-year period''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to coal produced and sold after December 31, 2018.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 101-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 101-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 101-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 101-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 101-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 5 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03303-CM-DCF Document 7 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03303-CM-DCF Document 7 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03303-CM-DCF Document 7 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03303-CM-DCF Document 7 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit
      No. 32.2





**Certification
      of CEO and CFO Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kansas City
      Power & Light Company (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended
      September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the "Report"), William H. Downey, as President and Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, and Terry Bassham, as Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
      of
      his knowledge:





(1)       The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                William H. DowneyName:
              Title:
            William
                H. Downey
              President
                and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
            November
                7, 2006/s/
                Terry BasshamName:
              Title:
            Terry
                Bassham
              Chief
                Financial OfficerDate:
            November
                7, 2006





This
      certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      and
      is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
      This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liability under that
      section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
      into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 except to the extent this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and specifically
      incorporated by reference in any such filing.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Kansas City Power & Light Company
      and will be retained by Kansas City Power & Light Company and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
C3378/216 

06/11/2007 2178738.01 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

DIRECT INVESTMENT PARTNERS AG, 

 

Plaintiff, 07 Civ. 3310 (LLS) (RLE)

-againstCERBERUS GLOBAL INVESTMENTS, LLC, 

CERBERUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P., 

CERBERUS PARTNERS, L.P., and CERBERUS 

GLOBAL INVESTMENT ADVISORS, LLC, 

Defendants. 

 FILED VIA ECF 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Notice is hereby given of the appearance of the counsel listed below on behalf of 

Defendants Cerberus Global Investments, LLC, Cerberus Capital Management, L.P., Cerberus 

Partners, L.P., and Cerberus Global Investment Advisors, LLC. 

All notices and/or pleadings in this matter should be served upon: 

Lawrence M. Rolnick, Esq. 

Lowenstein Sandler PC 

1251 Avenue of the Americas 

18th Floor 

New York, New York 10020 

Tel: 212.262.6700 

Fax: 212.262.7402 

-and65 Livingston Avenue 

Roseland, New Jersey 07068 

Tel: 973.597.2500 

Fax: 973.597.2400 

Email: LRolnick@lowenstein.com 

LEAD ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED 

 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED 

Case 1:07-cv-03310-LLS Document 8 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

Dated: June 11, 2007 LOWENSTEIN SANDLER PC 

By: s/ Lawrence M. Rolnick 

Lawrence M. Rolnick (LR-0546) 

1251 Avenue of the Americas 

18th Floor 

New York, New York 10020 

Tel: 212.262.6700 

Fax: 212.262.7402 

-and65 Livingston Avenue 

Roseland, New Jersey 07068 

Tel: 973.597.2500 

Fax: 973.597.2400 

Attorneys for Defendants Cerberus Global 

Investments, LLC, Cerberus Capital 

Management, L.P., Cerberus Partners, L.P., 

and Cerberus Global Investment Advisors, 

LLC 

Case 1:07-cv-03310-LLS Document 8 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### Batukram Anandram HARIYANI; Ranjanben Hariyani, Petitioners, v. Alberto GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

Nos. 03-70470, [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 4, 2005.**

Decided April 13, 2005.

Ashwani K. Bhakhri, Esq., Burlingame, CA, for Petitioners.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Linda S. Wendtland, Esq., John S. Hogan, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before KOZINSKI, HAWKINS, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Batukram Anandram 'Hariyani and his wife, Ranjanben Hariyani, natives and citizens of India, petition for review of the *903decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), affirming an Immigration Judge’s denial of their requests for asylum and withholding of removal.1

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the BIA’s decision on whether the petitioner has established eligibility for asylum under the substantial evidence standard. *See Hasan v. Ashcroft,*380 F.3d 1114, 1119 (9th Cir. 2004) (citing *Singh v. INS,*134 F.3d 962, 966 (9th Cir.1998)). We review questions of law regarding the Immigration and Nationality Act under the de novo standard. *Singh v. Ilchert,*69 F.3d 375, 378 (9th Cir.1995) (per curiam). We deny the petition.

After carefully reviewing the record, we agree with the BIA that Hariyani failed to demonstrate past persecution on account of a qualifying ground for asylum or withholding of removal. *See Dinu v. Ashcroft,*372 F.3d 1041, 1044-45 (9th Cir.2004).

We do not consider Hariyani’s Convention Against Torture claim because he failed to exhaust this issue before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Ms. Hariyani claims refugee status derivatively if asylum is granted to Mr. Hariyani.
#### INSURANCE CO. v. SUPPLY CO.

No. 36 PC.

Case below: 19 N.C. App. 302.

. Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 November 1973, . ...
# C_2007242EN.01000101.xml

| 16.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4653 — MBDA/Bayern-Chemie)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 242/01)

On 31 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4653. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4653. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Case 1:06-cv-14957-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### Manolito C. FALLORE, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 05-3095.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: March 4, 2005.

*291ORDER

Order Vacated, See 128 Fed.Appx. 149.

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
Securitiesand Exchange CommissionWashington,D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

QuarterlyReport Under Section 13 or 15 (d) of theSecuritiesExchange Act of 1934

For theQuarter ended June 30, 2002

CommissionFile No. 2-40764

Kansas CityLife Insurance Company3520 BroadwayKansas City,Missouri 64111-2565

Phone: (816) 753-7000

IRS Number:44-0308260

Incorporatedin the State of Missouri

**The Registrant (1) hasfiled all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15 (d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject tosuch filing requirements for the past 90 days.**

```
**Yes    X                       No______****Indicate the number of
shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of
the most recent date available.***Class**Outstanding August 2, 2002*
Common Stock, $1.25 par value                       11,981,260 shares

Part I
Financial Information
```
Skip to page content

United States Department of Labor

A to Z
Site Map
FAQs
Forms
About DOL
Contact Us
Español
DOL Home

# Page Not Found 

The page you requested wasn't found on our website. If you followed the link from another website, the link they provided may be outdated. Please check our Topics area or our A-Z Index to find what you are looking for.

Freedom of Information Act
Privacy & Security Statement
Disclaimers
Important Website Notices
Plug-Ins Used on DOL.gov
U.S. Department of Labor
TTY
Contact Us
##### 



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Each of the undersigned, Alan J. Lacy, Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Sears, Roebuck and Co. (the Company)
and Glenn R. Richter, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys annual report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2004 (the Report).

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

March 10, 2004



|                                                                          | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Alan J. Lacy                                                          | 
|Alan J. Lacy                                                              | 
|Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|/s/ Glenn R. Richter                                                      | 
|Glenn R. Richter                                                          | 
|Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer                         | 
|
#### COMR. OF INSURANCE v. ATTORNEY GENERAL

No. 77 PC.

Case below: 18 N.C. App. 23.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 June 1973.
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09

- 22

- 00138

- CV

__________________ SARAH WISENBAKER , Appellant
V.
TIFFANY THORN , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 137,501

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION
On Ma y 4 , 2022, the trial court signed a judgment for possession in favor of Tiffany Thorn in a forcible detained suit

. Sarah Wisenbaker, Appellant, filed a notice of appeal . The reporter’s record was filed on May 26, 2022, and the clerk’s record
was filed on J une 17, 2022

. The brief of the a ppellant was due on July 20, 2022.
On August 2 , 2022, we notified the parties that Appellant ’ s brief was past due. We warned the parties that unless we received a brief and motion for extension of time by August 12 , 2022, t he Court would submit the appeal on the record without2 a brief. We warned Appellant that the failure to file a brief could result in dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant
failed to file a brief. 1 In the absence of a brief assigning error for appellate review, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b) , 43.2(f)

. APPEAL DISMISSED

. PER CURIAM
Submitted on September 14, 2022 Opinion Delivered Septem ber 29, 2022 Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

1 On August 24, 2022, we also notified the parties that the Court was submitting the appeal on the record alone without briefs as of September 14, 2022.
# L_2007337EN.01008901.xml

| 21.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 337/89 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 337/89

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1553/2007

of 20 December 2007

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 900/2007

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 of 27 July 2007 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2007/08 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 of 27 July 2007 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2007/08 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 20 December 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 20 December 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 20 December 2007, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 shall be 35,810 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 December 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 December 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1260/2007 (OJ L 283, 27.10.2007, p. 1). Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 will be replaced by Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1) as from 1 October 2008.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 196, 28.7.2007, p. 26. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1298/2007 (OJ L 289, 7.11.2007, p. 3).

2

---
#### STATE v. RICE

No. 150 PC.

Case below: 18 N.C. App. 575.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 August 1973.
Case 1:06-cv-14957-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 34-4 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 1 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 34-4 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 2 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 34-4 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 3 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 34-4 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 4 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 34-4 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 5 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 34-4 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 6 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 34-4 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 7 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 34-4 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 8 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 34-4 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 9 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 34-4 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 10 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 34-4 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 11 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 34-4 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 12 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 34-4 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 13 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 34-4 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 14 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 34-4 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 15 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 34-4 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 16 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 34-4 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 17 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 34-4 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 18 of 19
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 34-4 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 19 of 19
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1371 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1371

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
  conduct a study on the effects of oxybenzone and octinoxate on the 
         environment and public health, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2019

Mr. Merkley (for himself and Ms. Hirono) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
  conduct a study on the effects of oxybenzone and octinoxate on the 
         environment and public health, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Oxybenzone and Octinoxate Impact 
Study Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF OXYBENZONE AND OCTINOXATE ON THE 
              ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC HEALTH.

    (a) Study.--
            (1) In general.--The Administrator of the Environmental 
        Protection Agency (referred to in this section as the 
        ``Administrator'') shall conduct a study on the impact of 
        oxybenzone and octinoxate on--
                    (A) the environment, including lethal and sublethal 
                impacts on aquatic ecosystems; and
                    (B) public health.
            (2) Inclusion.--The study under paragraph (1) shall include 
        analysis, documentation, and determinations on the impact of 
        oxybenzone and octinoxate on the protection and propagation 
        of--
                    (A) coral reefs; and
                    (B) marine life.
            (3) Consultation.--In conducting the study under paragraph 
        (1), the Administrator shall consult with--
                    (A) marine biology research centers located in the 
                United States on the shores of large bodies of water; 
                and
                    (B) the Director of the Centers for Disease Control 
                and Prevention.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to Congress and make 
publicly available on the website of the Environmental Protection 
Agency a report that describes the results of the study conducted under 
subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE v. DAVIS.

No. 42 PC.

Case below: 10 N.C. App. 712.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 May 1971.