United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

C.M., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, 

Philadelphia, PA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0285

Issued: June 6, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

JURISDICTION

On December 21, 2022 appellant filed a timely appeal from a June 28, 2022 merit decision 

and a November 22, 2022 nonmerit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs 

(OWCP). Pursuant to the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act1(FECA) and 20 C.F.R. 

§§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board has jurisdiction over the merits of this case.

ISSUES

The issues are: (1) whether appellant has met his burden of proof to establish entitlement 

to continuation of pay (COP); and (2) whether OWCP properly determined that appellant had 

abandoned his request for an oral hearing before a representative of OWCP’s Branch of Hearings 

and Review.

FACTUAL HISTORY

On May 17, 2022 appellant, then a 43-year-old collect and delivery employee, filed a 

traumatic injury claim (Form CA-1) alleging that on November 12, 2021 he injured his lower back 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.
2

delivering a package while in the performance of duty. He indicated by checkmark that he was 

claiming COP. On the reverse side of the claim form, the employing establishment indicated that 

it had received notice of the injury on May 17, 2022. Appellant stopped work on 

November 12, 2021.

In a development letter dated May 24, 2022, OWCP informed appellant of the deficiencies 

of his claim. It advised him of the medical evidence necessary to establish his claim. OWCP 

afforded appellant 30 days to submit the necessary evidence.

Thereafter, OWCP received medical evidence. 

On June 28, 2022 OWCP accepted appellant’s claim for a sprain of the ligaments of the 

thoracic spine. 

By decision dated June 28, 2022, OWCP denied appellant’s claim for COP, finding that he 

had failed to report the November 12, 2021 employment injury on a form approved by OWCP 

within 30 days, as required. It advised him that the denial of COP did not affect his entitlement to 

compensation and that he could, therefore, file a claim for compensation (Form CA-7) for lost 

wages due to his accepted employment injury.

In a statement dated July 22, 2022, W.L., a supervisor, asserted that at the time of the

November 2021 incident, another supervisor was in charge who failed to turn in the proper 

paperwork.

On July 23, 2022 appellant requested an oral hearing before a representative of OWCP’s 

Branch of Hearings and Review. 

In an October 7, 2022 notice, OWCP’s hearing representative informed appellant that a 

telephonic hearing was scheduled for November 10, 2022 at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Standard Time 

(EST). The notice provided a toll-free number and the required passcode to participate in the 

telephone hearing. OWCP’s hearing representative instructed appellant to call the toll-free number 

provided and enter the passcode when prompted. She mailed the letter to his last known address 

of record.

Appellant did not call for the scheduled hearing and there is no indication that he requested 

postponement.

By decision dated November 22, 2022, OWCP found that appellant had abandoned his 

request for an oral hearing. It determined that he had failed to appear at the telephonic hearing 

scheduled for November 10, 2022 and had failed to contact OWCP either before or after the 

scheduled hearing to request a postponement or explain his failure to appear.

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 1

Section 8118(a) of FECA2 authorizes continuation of pay, not to exceed 45 days, to an 

employee who has filed a claim for a period of wage loss due to a traumatic injury with his or her 

2

5 U.S.C. § 8118(a).
3

immediate superior on a form approved by the Secretary of Labor within the time specified in 

section 8122(a)(2) of this title. This latter section provides that written notice of injury shall be 

given within 30 days.3 The context of section 8122 makes clear that this means within 30 days of 

the injury.4

OWCP regulations provide, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for continuation of pay, an 

employee must: (1) have a traumatic injury which is job related and the cause of the disability 

and/or the cause of lost time due to the need for medical examination and treatment; (2) file a Form 

CA-1 within 30 days of the date of the injury (but if that form is not available, using another form 

would not alone preclude receipt); and (3) begin losing time from work due to the traumatic injury 

within 45 days of the injury.5

The employee must provide a written report on a Form CA-1 to the employing 

establishment within 30 days of the injury.6 OWCP’s procedures provide that another OWCPapproved form, such as CA-2, CA-2a, or CA-7 forms, which contains words of claim, can be used 

to satisfy timely filing requirements.7

The Board has held that section 8122(d)(3) of FECA,8 which allows OWCP to excuse 

failure to comply with the time limitation provision for filing a claim for compensation because of 

exceptional circumstances, is not applicable to section 8118(a), which sets forth the filing 

requirements for continuation of pay. Thus, there is no provision in the law for excusing an 

employee’s failure to file a claim within 30 days of the employment injury. 9

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 1

The Board finds that appellant has not met his burden of proof to establish entitlement to 

COP.

Appellant filed written notice of his traumatic injury on May 17, 2022, more than 30 days 

after his November 12, 2021 employment injury. As he filed his claim on May 17, 2022, the Board 

finds that it was not filed within 30 days of the accepted November 12, 2021 injury, as specified 

in sections 8118(a) and 8122(a)(2) of FECA.10 Accordingly, the Board finds that OWCP properly 

3

Id. at § 8122(a)(2).

4

See T.N., Docket No. 21-0402 (issued January 31, 2022); M.B., Docket No. 17-1782 (issued February 5, 2018).

5

20 C.F.R. § 10.205(a)(1-3); see also M.B., id.

6

Id. at § 10.210(a).

7 Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 2 --Claims, Continuation of Pay and Initial Payments, Chapter 2.807.5b 

(June 2012).

8

5 U.S.C. § 8122(d)(3).

9

See E.M., Docket No. 20-0837 (issued January 27, 2021); William E. Ostertag, 33 ECAB 1925 (1982). 

10 5 U.S.C. §§ 8118(a), 8122(a)(2).
4

denied COP as appellant did not file written notice of injury on an approved form within the 

requisite 30 days from the date of injury.11 

Appellant may submit new evidence or argument with a written request for reconsideration 

to OWCP within one year of this merit decision, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 8128(a) and 20 C.F.R. 

§§ 10.605 through 10.607.

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 2

A claimant who has received a final adverse decision by OWCP may obtain a hearing by 

writing to the address specified in the decision within 30 days of the date of the decision for which 

a hearing is sought.12 Unless otherwise directed in writing by the claimant, OWCP’s hearing 

representative will mail a notice of the time and place of the hearing to the claimant and any 

representative at least 30 days before the scheduled date. 13 OWCP has the burden of proof to 

establish that it properly mailed to a claimant and any representative of record a notice of a 

scheduled hearing.14

A claimant who fails to appear at a scheduled hearing may request in writing, within 10 

days after the date set for the hearing, that another hearing be scheduled. Where good cause for 

failure to appear is shown, another hearing will be scheduled and conducted by teleconference. 

The failure of the claimant to request another hearing within 10 days, or the failure of the claimant 

to appear at the second scheduled hearing without good cause shown, shall constitute abandonment 

of the request for a hearing.15

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 2

The Board finds that OWCP properly determined that appellant had abandoned his request 

for an oral hearing before a representative of OWCP’s Branch of Hearings and Review.

Following OWCP’s June 28, 2022 decision denying appellant’s claim for COP, he filed a 

timely request for an oral hearing before a representative of OWCP’s Branch of Hearings and 

Review. In an October 7, 2022 letter, OWCP’s hearing representative notified him that a 

telephonic hearing was scheduled for November 10, 2022 at 11:00 a.m., EST. The hearing 

representative properly mailed the hearing notice to appellant’s last known address of record16 and 

provided him with a toll-free number and a pass code to use at the time of the scheduled hearing. 

There is no evidence of nondelivery of the hearing notice. Appellant, however, failed to appear 

11 D.R., Docket No. 22-0361 (issued July 8, 2022); A.G., Docket No. 20-0942 (issued February 14, 2022).

12 20 C.F.R. § 10.616(a).

13 Id. at § 10.617(b).

14 T.R., Docket No. 19-1952 (issued April24, 2020); M.R., Docket No. 18-1643 (issued March 1, 2019); MichelleR. 

Littlejohn, 42 ECAB 463 (1991).

15 20 C.F.R. § 10.622(f); Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 2 --Claims, Hearings and Reviews of the Written 

Record, Chapter 2.1601.6(g) (September 2020); A.J., Docket No. 18-0830 (issued January 10, 2019).

16 R.J., Docket No. 18-1701 (issued May 18, 2020); E.S., Docket No. 19-0567 (issued August 5, 2019).
5

for the scheduled hearing and he did not request a postponement or provide an explanation to 

OWCP for his failure to attend the hearing within 10 days of the scheduled hearing. 17 The Board 

thus finds that OWCP properly determined that appellant abandoned his request for an oral 

hearing.18

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that appellant has not met his burden of proof to establish entitlement to 

COP. The Board further finds that OWCP properly determined that appellant had abandoned his 

request for an oral hearing before a representative of OWCP’s Branch of Hearings and Review.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the June 28 and November 22, 2022 decisions of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs are affirmed.

Issued: June 6, 2023

Washington, DC

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

17 R.J., id.; A.J., Docket No. 18-0830 (issued January 10, 2019).

18 E.M., Docket No. 29-0837 (issued January 27, 2021).