alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jean Ellen, (202) 434-9950/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,

Chief Docket Clerk.

[FR Doc. 05-22832 Filed 11-14-05; 3:31 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
October 9. 1975
The Honorable Joe Lassiter Opinion No. H- 712 Chairman, Texas Private Employment Agency Regulatory Board Re: Whether certain temporary P. 0. Box 12157 employment agencies are subject Austin, Texas 78757 to regulation under article 522la-6, V. T. C.S. Dear Chairman Lassiter: You have requested our opinion regarding whether certain temporary employment agencies are subject to regulation under article 5221a-6, V. T. C.S. That statute is applicable to every “private employment agency!’ as defined in section l(e), “except as . . .exempted from [its] provisions.
. . .” Section 2provides, however, that:

. . .~theprovisions ofthis Act shall not apply to any person conducting a business which consists of employing individuals directly for the purpose offurnishing part-time or~temporary help to others. You state that persons who are assigned to work bya temporary employment agency are, in the typical instance, directly employed and paid by the agency. Inmost cases, however, the terms ofthe agency’s contract with the contracting employer state that, if it should retain the employee ona permanent basis, the contracting employer, or in some cases the employee, is liable to the agency for a “liquidation fee. ” You inquire whether this procedure brings theetemporary employment agency within the regulatory purview of article 5221a-6. In **our** opinion, a temporary employment agency which occasionally offers other services, butwhose overriding business activity is that stated in the exception, does not thereby fall outside the exception. Where the employee is on the agency’s payroll and subsequently accepts a position with the contracting employer, payment to the agency would appear to be a kind of liquidated damages given in consideration ofthe agency’s loss ofits employee rather than the kind of “fee” contemplated by section l(b) ofthe statute.

p. 3064The Honorable Joe Lassiter - page 2 (H-712)

You have not provided us with any specific instances, and we believe that each such situation must bejudged onits particular facts. Indoing so, the Board should keep in mind the purposes ofthe Act, as expressed in Attorney General Opinion M-750 (1970). It should be vigilant to insure that no business which is in fact a “private employment agency” as defined in section l(e) is permitted to utilize the exception as a subterfuge by which to avoid regulation. SUMMARY Ingeneral, a temporary employment agency, whose business “consists of employing individuals directly for the purpose offurnishing part-time or temporary help to others, ” is excepted from regulation under article 5221a-6, V. T. C.S., but each case must bejudged onits particular facts. Very truly yours,

Attorney General of Texas

p. 3065
# USS Oklahoma Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Day, F.)

/ Published Nov. 27, 2019
WASHINGTON,
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER WITHDRAWING MEDIATION ORDER

Appellate case name: City of Houston and The Police Officers and Firefighters Civil Service 

Commission v. Lisa Simmons

Appellate case number: 01-12-00800-CV

Date motion filed: October 31, 2012

Type of Motion: Objection to Mediation

Party filing motion: Appellee

Trial court case number: 0444542

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

It is ORDERED that Appellee’s objection to mediation is granted. We withdraw 

our Mediation Order dated October 23, 2012.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Jennings

x Acting individually 

Date: November 8, 2012i

 

i

Absent emergency or a statement that the motion is unopposed, must wait ten days before acting on motion except for 

motion to extend time to file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a).

Note: Single justice may grant or deny any request for relief properly sought by motion, except in a civil case a single justice

should not: (1) act on a petition for an extraordinary writ or (2) dismiss or otherwise determine an appeal or a motion 

for rehearing. TEX. R. APP. P. 10.4(a).
#### STATE v. BLAND

No. 83 PC.

Case below: 19 N.C. App. 560.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 December 1973.
(b) (2)
(b) (2)
(b) (2)
(b) (2)
#### WILLIAM TERRELL MATHEWS, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 8018

October 30, 1975

541 P.2d 906

*683
      *Horace R. Goff,*State Public Defender, and *J. Thomas Susich,*Deputy Public Defender, Carson City, for Movant.

*Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *George E. Holt,*District Attorney, and *Dan M. Seaton,*Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Pursuant to a judgment of conviction and sentence in the Eighth Judicial District, Clark County, William Terrell Mathews is incarcerated in the Nevada State Prison. An appeal from the judgment is in progress.

Mathews had been represented by private counsel during trial, and in the early stages of the appeal; however, when Mathews’ financial resources were depleted, the office of the state public defender was appointed to continue the appeal.

The matter is before us at this time on motion of the State Public Defender to be relieved of the appointment because, he contends, representation of Mathews, in this instance, is not one of his statutory duties. We agree.

The office of the state public defender was created to provide competent legal representation for eligible indigents in the Nevada counties which did not have their own public defender system. See Stats, of Nev. 1971, ch. 622, p. 1410 et seq., which has been codified as NRS ch. 180.

The duties of the state public defender are delineated in NRS 180.060; and, § 3 of that statute contemplates, among other things, that, in counties which have a public defender, the state public defender is only required to prepare and present appeals in post-conviction proceedings.

The duties of county public defenders are set forth in NRS 260.050, and § 2 of that statute contemplates that county public defenders shall represent all eligible indigents at all stages of all appeals, except the post-conviction proceedings specified in NRS 180.060(3).

*684Under NRS ch. 260, when an eligible indigent takes an appeal from a judgment of conviction in counties having a public defender system, the appeal must be handled by the county public defender; except, of course, in those cases where the county defender cannot act or is otherwise disqualified; and, in such cases, private counsel should be appointed, pursuant to NRS 171.188 and, at the appropriate time, be compensated, as authorized by NRS 7.260.

Accordingly, we conclude the State Public Defender has no duty or responsibility to represent William Terrell Mathews in this direct appeal from the judgment of conviction. The motion to be relieved as counsel is granted; and, the Clark County Public Defender is hereby appointed to represent William Terrell Mathews in this appeal. Said counsel may, on or before November 24, 1975, serve and file a supplemental and/or reply brief. NRAP 2.

It is so ORDERED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7494

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee,

versus

GEORGE ALDEN BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CR-99-242, CA-01-2348-2-23)

Submitted: April 25, 2003 Decided: May 30, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Alden Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

George Alden Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. An appeal may not be

taken from the final order in a motion under § 2255 unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not

issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent

“a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude Brown has not made the requisite showing. See

Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S. , 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 23- 540 LT Case No. 2022

- CF

- 004693



### _____________________________

J OSHUA T YLER S TEPPS , Appellant 

### ,

v. S T ATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee



### .

_____________________________
On appea l from th e Circu it Court for Du va l County. R. Anthon y Salem, Ju dge.
Matthew J

. Me tz, Pub lic De fende r, and Andrew Mich , Assistan t Public Defender, Dayton a Beach, for Appe llant. Ashley Moody , Attorney G enera l, a nd B e njamin L

. Hoffman, Assistant Attorn ey Ge neral, Tallahassee , for Appellee.
Au gust 29, 2023
P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

. E DWARDS , C.J. , L AMBERT , and P RATT , JJ ., concur.2 _____________________________ N ot final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
No. 13

- 1876

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

CLIFFORD CHARLES TYLER

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

v.

HILLSDALE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, ET AL.

,

Defendants

- Appellees

. )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) O R D E R

BEFORE: COLE, Chief Judge; BOGGS, BATCHELDER, MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS,

ROGERS, SUTTON, COOK McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE,

STRANCH, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing

of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

“The effect of the granting of a hearing en b anc shall be to vacate the previous

opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore th e case

on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED , that the previous decision and judgment of this court is

vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for

oral argument as soon as possible.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Board Members and Executive Officers

Board of Directors                 Executive Officers

James F. Taylor, Jr.               Roger O. Coupland
Chairman of the Board and          President, Intergraph Public Safety, Inc.
Chief Executive Officer
                                   Graeme J. Farrell
Larry J. Laster                    Executive Vice President, Asia Pacific
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer            Preetha R. Pulusani
                                   President, Intergraph Mapping and
                                   Geospatial Solutions
Richard W. Cardin
                                   Gerhard Sallinger
Linda L. Green                     President, Intergraph Process, Power &
				   Offshore
Lawrence R. Greenwood
			           William E. Salter
Thomas J. Lee                      President, Intergraph Solutions Group

Sidney L. McDonald                 Edward A. Wilkinson
                                   Executive Vice President
Joseph C. Moquin
                                   Jack C. Ickes
                                   Vice President, Corporate Services

                                   David Vance Lucas
                                   Vice President and General Counsel
SECRETARY
                                   Larry T. Miles
David Vance Lucas                  Vice President, Finance

                                   Charlotte S. Shaw
                                   Vice  President and Chief Accounting Officer

                                   Eugene H. Wrobel
                                   Vice President and Treasurer
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 16 Filed 04/05/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 16 Filed 04/05/2006 Page 2 of 2
# EUR-Lex - 32007M4535 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32007M4535

**Commission Decision of 26/02/2007 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.4535 - CHARTERHOUSE / VIVARTE) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

Brussels, 26/02/2007

SG-Greffe(2007) D/200900

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No. COMP/M.4535 – Charterhouse / Vivarte

Notification of 25.01.2007 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1]

Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 23, 01/02/2007

1. On 25/01/2007 the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which Charterhouse Capital Limited (“Charterhouse”, United Kingdom) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation sole control of Novarte SAS ("Novarte"; France) the ultimate parent company of the Vivarte Group (“Vivarte", France), by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- Charterhouse : equity capital

- Vivarte : retailing of footwear and clothing

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph b of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

signed

Philip LOWE

Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32

--------------------------------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [Report No. 2691]

Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification have been filed in the Commission's Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). The full text of this document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). Oppositions to these petitions must be filed by February 22, 2005. See § 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions have expired.

*Subject:*                     In the Matter of Dismissed Modification Application for WHR901, Florida Atlantic University, Boynton Beach, Florida (WT Docket No. 03-66).                

Amendment of Parts 1, 21, 73, 74 and 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Provision of Fixed and Mobile Broadband Access, Educational and Other Advanced Services in the 2150-2162 and 2500-2690 MHz Bands (WT Docket No. 03-66, RM-10586).

Part 1 of the Commission's Rules—Further Competitive Bidding Procedures (WT Docket No. 03-67).

                    Amendment of Parts 21 and 74 to Enable Multipoint Distribution Service and the Instructional Television Fixed Service Amendment of Parts 21 and 74 to Engage in Fixed Two-Way                           ( print page 6441)                        Transmissions (MM Docket No. 97-217).                

Amendment of Parts 21 and 74 of the Commission's Rules With Regard to Licensing in the Multipoint Distribution Service and in the Instructional Television Fixed Service for the Gulf of Mexico (WT Docket No. 02-68, RM-9718).

Promoting Efficient Use of Spectrum Through Elimination of Barriers to the Development of Secondary Markets (WT Docket No. 00-230).

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     24.                

Marlene H. Dortch,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 05-2270  Filed 2-4-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
Document

Exhibit 10.8


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
2017 NEW HIRE EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


This Amendment No. 1 to the Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. 2017 New Hire Equity Incentive Plan (this “Amendment”) is effective as of November 1, 2021 and amends the Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. 2017 New Hire Equity Incentive Plan (as amended from time to time, the “Plan”) pursuant to Section 14.2 of the Plan.  Unless otherwise expressly provided for in this Amendment, all capitalized words or phrases or other defined terms used in this Amendment will have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Plan.
1.Section 3.1 of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:
“3.1 Basic Limitation. Common Shares issued pursuant to the Plan may be authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares. Subject to Article 11, the aggregate number of Common Shares issued under the Plan shall not exceed (a) 2,066,711 Common Shares; plus (b) the additional Common Shares described in Section 3.2. The number of Common Shares that are subject to Awards outstanding at any time under the Plan shall not exceed the number of Common Shares that then remain available for issuance under the Plan. Subject to Section 3.2, the number of Common Shares that may be awarded under the Plan shall be reduced by one share for every Award under the Plan.” 
Except as expressly amended hereby, the Plan shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed.






Adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors:     November 1, 2021
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.3 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery