alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
The X-Change Corporation
File No. 002-41703
Form 10-Q/A
Quarter ended June 30, 2011

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 -
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The X-Change Corporation (Company) on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (Report),  I, Arthur Molina,  Jr., Chief
Executive and Acting Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350,  adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Dated: October 11, 2011                  By: /s/ Arthur Molina, Jr.
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                              Arthur Molina, Jr.
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Acting Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to The  X-Change  Corporation  and will be  retained  by The  X-Change
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honomblm John D. RI& 

Coulerloner, Bureau of Labor Stiatlrtios 

Aurria, Poser 

Dam Sir: 

II on April 24, 

r towa la ImuA . 

or mom that 

8 l p p l80 p mid 

o p la ll u+ o n tha 

Atiial. 1573 of 

1573, Panal Coda, 

r 8!Aplayea of any PtWWA, 

rartrr 8mplot a4 0hila 

hbm in or bout w 

Xn Speare v. City of San Antonia, 223 9.Y. 166, lt 

we6 selQ by the 3uprear Court ot Terasr 

“l%ofa 16 but ona rulr of OOn8tZ’UOt~OA, aAd that I# 

that the Lep,islatirr intent ram8 &OV8rZIem 
Hoaorable John Ii. kee4, p8ge 2 

Thus * statute *roulQ _. _. _. . . 

to it8 lcfenaec aaope 

i 

lte gOnera purpose, end Oh8 8Ad QC 

object sou&t tu be e telnmd , all of %&lob are osttere OS 

leglrlnti*a Lnt*nt. 

The pnreaoeat 6~11 wh!~oh Jrttole 1573, eupP~, 

emnireatlg *‘wht to prerrat woe injury to ehlldrrn under 

15 yenta of ngc< remultl~ frmi the oooupetion 3f l m& 

children la UAAS~ labor Ln or sbmt faotorler, rille, 

rorkehops and lronarlea, thle regmrdleee of the rim bi 

the oity or town in ublah l uob l peollisd setablirhAeAtA 

might be situated. The alar at the city ox' town in *hioh 

eueh l otabllehmrtit 8i&ht be eltoa%oQ eouid hate 110 off+ 

on the evil sopght to ba prerenQe4 lo this r88plOtr The 

uorur ". . . or in reosrager rervlor In towns or oltira 

or sore then 15,000 po Alatioa. 

l laplO$Wsnt OS 8UOh Ohi P 

. . .* l ~ply only to t&o 

dr8A :A A8#88ng8r 88rviOO iA tURAA 

or altlea of 100m then 15,000 popoleblon, l aoordlw %a the 

preer~l~ redera oeaeua. Wml~er tly the 1 r&l. ttirr OOA- 

~*:uerra met weeenger rerrlor -is oft&e* or towlu hetin& 

TV pOplet:OA 0s AOre theA x5s000 WnU WI8 hiD43erOUb tiem 

IA oft188 havhg a lewer pepaletioab By 80 llnltio(c Bh%r 

feature of the Aot thaw effect la to p&&t tha l aplO~ojrrat 

at ohildren onder 15 fears OS ofid lo mesee~er aenlor Jm 

tome &ohg a populetlaa of 15,000 br Letr. 

A0 Oitt AOr'tiOUD :A &m &oOty bsViIl& l 

more than 15,000, ohil6ren uader the age 

lawfully be empleefed in 0ee#eager rervloe Ln eAY slty or 

tOWA :A BFOUA COAAtY. However, rash oblldren uy mot bo 

amlored to labor fa’mw f6OtO?y, alUs wmbbop or bundrF 

COMMIl76L 

. - .
Case 1:07-cv-03315-RMB Document 5 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 1 of 7Case 1:07-cv-03315-RMB Document 5 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 2 of 7Case 1:07-cv-03315-RMB Document 5 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 3 of 7Case 1:07-cv-03315-RMB Document 5 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 4 of 7Case 1:07-cv-03315-RMB Document 5 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 5 of 7Case 1:07-cv-03315-RMB Document 5 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 6 of 7Case 1:07-cv-03315-RMB Document 5 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 7 of 7
#### Gussie MINUS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Dak AMERICAS, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 04-2544.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 2, 2005.

Decided April 6, 2005.

Gussie Minus, Appellant pro se.

Stacy Kaplan Wood, Parker, Poe, Adams *&*Bernstein, L.L.P., Charlotte, North Carolina; James Walker Coleman, IV, Parker, Poe, Adams *&*Bernstein, *504L.L.P., Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Gussie Minus appeals the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge recommending summary judgment in favor of DAK Americas in Minus’ employment discrimination action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The report and recommendation from which Minus appeals does not constitute an order over which this court may exercise jurisdiction. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We deny all pending motions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 1 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 2 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 3 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 4 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 5 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 6 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 7 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 8 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 9 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 10 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 11 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 12 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 13 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 14 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 15 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 16 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 17 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 18 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 19 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 20 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 21 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 22 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 23 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP Document 1-2 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 24 of 24
#### WARD v. G. E. CO. and INVESTMENT BUILDERS v. G. E. CO. and COLVIS CO. v. G. E. CO. and SUPER MARKETS v. G. E. CO.

No. 96 PC.

Case below: 35 N.C. App. 495.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 May 1978.
# L_2007146EN.01001801.xml

| 8.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 146/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 146/18

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 636/2007

of 7 June 2007

derogating from the Annex to Council Regulation No 79/65/EEC, as regards the divisions of Romania

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania,

Having regard to the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania, and in particular Article 41(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Annex to Council Regulation No 79/65/EEC of 15 June 1965 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Economic Community (1) lays down a list of divisions within the meaning of Article 2(d) of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Annex to Council Regulation No 79/65/EEC of 15 June 1965 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Economic Community (1) lays down a list of divisions within the meaning of Article 2(d) of that Regulation.

| (2) | According to that Annex, Romania is divided into eight divisions. Following a request by Romania, for the purposes of Regulation No 79/65/EEC, Romania should be considered as a single division for the first three years after its accession to the European Union in order to facilitate the definition of a realistic selection plan. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

According to that Annex, Romania is divided into eight divisions. Following a request by Romania, for the purposes of Regulation No 79/65/EEC, Romania should be considered as a single division for the first three years after its accession to the European Union in order to facilitate the definition of a realistic selection plan.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Community Committee for the Farm Accountancy Data Network, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Community Committee for the Farm Accountancy Data Network,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

By way of derogation from the Annex to Regulation No 79/65/EEC, for the purposes of the application of that Regulation, Romania constitutes a single division until 31 December 2009.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from the 2007 accounting year.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 June 2007.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ 109, 23.6.1965, p. 1859/65. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1791/2006 (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p. 1).

1

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

January 5, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00577

- CV

Clarissa Nicole LOPEZ

, Appellant

v.

Alberto Luis CAVAZOS

, Appellee

From the County Court

, Jim Wells County, Texas Trial Court No. 20

- 02

- 60230

- CV Honorable Michael Ventura Garcia , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On December 30, 2020, we ordered appellant to file written proof that she properly requested the court reporter to prepare the record by designating the portions of the proceedings and the exhibits to be included. In that order, we informed the court reporter that she must file the record no later than thirty days after appellant filed her written pro of. That same day, appellant filed written proof that she requested the record on November 20, 2020. Accordingly,

we ORDER the court reporter to file the reporter’s record by January 29, 2021

. Further extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WH EREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 5th day of January, 2021

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,817
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,819
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (13,526)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,895
<PP&E>                                       2,358,252
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,227,650
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          585,948
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       799,187
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,266,535)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   171,547
<SALES>                                         69,984
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,123
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,979
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               182,541
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,833
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (127,397)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (127,397)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (127,397)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.016)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.016)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Al A. Gonsoulin, Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 1.  the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and  2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for theperiod covered by such Report.
Dated: March 15, 2005      By: /s/ Al A. Gonsoulin       Al A. Gonsoulin   Chief Executive Officer
Order entered August 26 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 00565
- CV
JW GST EXEMPT TRUST , ET AL., Appellant s V. WRENO S. WYNNE , ET AL. , Appellee s On Appeal from the 86th District Court Kaufman County, Texas Tr ial Court Cause No. 84117
- 86 

### O RDER Before the Court is appellants’ August 21, 2014 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file their brief pending supplementation of the clerk’s record. A 2,562 page clerk’s record was filed on June 4, 2014. On Au gust 20, 2014, the parties filed a joint motion in the trial court requesting preparation of a supplemental clerk’s record to correct “numerous errors in the record, including an incorrectly numbered Index, hundreds of missing pages of exhibits, and

severa l motions and briefs placed out of order in the record.” On August 21, 2014, the Court received a 4

- volume corrected clerk’s record totaling 2,578 pages. Because the corrected clerk’s record is only 16 pages longer than the original clerk’s record, it do es not properly address the parties’ joint motion.Accor dingly, we GRANT appellants’ motion as follows: We STRIKE the clerk’s records filed on June 4, 2014 and August 21, 2014. We ORDER Rhonda Hughey, Kaufman County District Clerk, to file ON OR BEFORE SEPTEMBER 25, 2014 , a clerk’ s record correcting each error raised in the parties’ joint motion. Appellants’ brief will be due fifteen days after the clerk’s record is filed.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order by electronic
tran smission to the Honorable Howard Tygrett, Judge of the 86th Judicial District Court of Kaufman County, Texas, Rhonda Hughey, and all counsel of record.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
#### BROWNING v. LEVIEN & CO.

No. 83 PC.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 701.

Petitions by plaintiffs and defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 June 1980.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.77 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
U.S. Department of Labor 

JUL - I 1993 

Employment S:andards Admlnistratron 

Ofi:ce of Wor~ers' Cornoensa1 on Proc·a:T1s 

Division ol ~ongshor~ a'nd " 

Harbor Workers' Compensation 

Wasr:1·ng:-J;',, D.C. 20210 

Notice No. 81 

NOTICE TO INSURANCE CARRIERS AND SELF-INSURED EMPLOYERS UNDER THE 

LONGSHORE AND HARBOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION ACT, AND OTHER 

INTERESTED PERSONS 

SUBJECT: Restructuring of the Longshore Program in the San 

Francisco Region of OWCP 

Effective July 1, 1996, the operation of the Longshore Program in 

the San Francisco Region of OWCP will be restructured. One 

District Director will direct and oversee all Longshore program 

operations for the 13th, 15th and 18th Longshore compensation 

districts. The district offices currently located in San 

Francisco and Honolulu, Hawaii are being redesignated as 

suboffices in accordance with 20 CFR 702.102(c) (see 60 FR 51348 

dated October 2, 1995). This restructuring is necessary due to 

budgetary constraints and will result in a more efficient 

allocation of limited resources throughout the Longshore program. 

No changes are being made at this time in the jurisdictional 

areas comprising the 13th, 15th and 18th compensation districts 

and the offices will remain at their current addresses. 

Therefore, all injury claims for the 13th and 15th compensation 

districts should continue to be filed with the San Francisco and 

Honolulu offices, respectively. Injury claims for the 18th 

compensation district should also continue to be filed with the 

Long Beach district office. 

Joyce Terry, who is currently the district director for the 18th 

compensation district, has also been designated as acting 

district director for the 13th and 15th compensation districts. 

She will oversee all work carried out by staff in the three 

compensation districts. All questions concerning the processing 

of claims under this restructuring should be directed to District 

Director Terry in the Long Beach office at Area Code (310) 980-

3578. 

All forms, documents, and correspondence for claims arising in 

the San Francisco, Honolulu and Long Beach compensation districts 

should continue to be filed with those offices as is currently 

done. 

/, 

.· 0 

Di ector, 

Longshore 

Workers' Compensation 

/
# L_2010084DE.01005901.xml

| 31.3.2010 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 84/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2010

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 84/59

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 646/2007 der Kommission vom 12. Juni 2007 zur Durchführung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2160/2003 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über ein Gemeinschaftsziel zur Senkung der Prävalenz von Salmonella enteritidis und Salmonella typhimurium bei Masthähnchen und zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1091/2005

Salmonella enteritidis

Salmonella typhimurium

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 151 vom 13. Juni 2007
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 151 vom 13. Juni 2007

Auf Seite 23, im Anhang in Nummer 1 Buchstabe b erster Gedankenstrich:

anstatt:

„drei Wochen vor dem Transport“

muss es heißen:

„innerhalb von drei Wochen vor dem Transport“.

---