alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10-c

               AMENDMENT 2 TO CREDIT AGREEMENT

     This Amendment 2 to Credit Agreement (the "Amendment")
is entered into as of June 4, 2001, by and between KLT
Telecom Inc. (the "Lender") and Digital Teleport, Inc. (the
"Borrower").

     Whereas, Lender and Borrower have entered into a
certain Credit Agreement dated as of February 21, 2001,
providing for revolving credit loans of up to $25 million in
the aggregate, which was amended by Amendment 1 dated as of
April 30, 2001, to provide, among other things, an increase
in the available commitment to $35 million (as so amended,
the "Credit Agreement"), and

     Whereas, Borrower has requested to increase the maximum
borrowing amount under the Credit Agreement, and Lender is
willing to increase such amount on the terms and conditions
herein.

         Therefore, in consideration of the of the
undertakings set forth herein and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

1.   Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined
shall have the meanings attributed to such terms in the
Credit Agreement.

2.   The definition of "Commitment" in Article I of the
Credit Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as
follows:

          "Commitment" means the obligation of the Lender to
     make Loans not exceeding Forty Five Million Dollars
     ($45,000,000.00) in aggregate principal amount at any
     time outstanding.

3.   This Amendment shall take effect on the last to occur
of (i) the execution and delivery of this Amendment by
Borrower and Lender, and (ii) Lender executing and
delivering to Borrower a Second Amended and Restated Demand
Promissory Note, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.

4.   To induce the Lender to enter into this Amendment, the
Borrower represents and warrants that:

     (a)  The representations and warranties set forth in
Article IV of the Credit Agreement are true, correct and
complete on the date hereof as if made on and as of the
dated hereof.

     (b)  No Default exists on the date hereof.

5.   The Credit Agreement, as amended hereby, is hereby
ratified, approved and confirmed in all respects.

<PAGE>

In witness whereof, Lender and Borrower have executed this
Amendment as of the date first above written.

                   Digital Teleport, Inc.

                   By:           /s/ Gary W. Douglass

                   Name:         Gary W. Douglass

                   Title:        Senior Vice President
                                 and Chief Financial
                                 Officer

                   8112 Maryland Avenue, Suite 400
                   St. Louis, MO 63105

                   Telecopier:   (314) 253-1999


                   KLT Telecom Inc.

                   By:           /s/ Mark Schroeder

                   Name:         Mark Schroeder

                   Title:        Vice President

                   10740 Nall, Suite 230
                   Overland Park, KS 66211

                   Telecopier:   (913) 967-4340
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 7

- 00 542

- CR

Style: Michael Deion Trammell v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : July 3 , 201 7

Type of motion: M otion to Withdraw a nd Substitute C ounsel

Part y filing motion: Appell ant ’s Appointed Counsel Shannon Hooks and new counsel

Christopher M. Perri

Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No

.

Ordered that motion i s :

 Granted

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

Appellant’s appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw and substitute counsel is granted

because it was signed by both withdrawing and new counsel and complies with Rule

6.5(d). See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.3 (c)

, 6.5( b), (d). Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is

directed to remove Shannon Hooks as attorney for appellant and to add Christopher

M. Perri as lead counsel for appellant

.

Judge ’ s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes



Date: July 25, 2017
SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>          MAR-31-1998

<CASH>                       6,016,049 
<SECURITIES>                      0    
<RECEIVABLES>                  415,052 
<ALLOWANCES>                      0    
<INVENTORY>                       0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             6,431,101 
<PP&E>                       4,860,403 
<DEPRECIATION>                    0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>              11,511,597 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          763,595 
<BONDS>                      1,730,999 
<COMMON>                          0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0    
<PREFERRED>                       0    
<OTHER-SE>                   6,577,497 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>11,511,597 
<SALES>                        867,424 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               936,566 
<CGS>                             0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  395,549 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                66,017 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              57,634 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                417,366 
<INCOME-TAX>                      0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            327,018 
<DISCONTINUED>                    0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0    
<CHANGES>                         0    
<NET-INCOME>                   327,018 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    16.02 
<EPS-DILUTED>                    16.02 

        

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. TILLEY

No. 102 PC.

Case below: 18 N.C. App. 291.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 12 July 1973. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for. lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 12 July 1973.
HORACE YOUNG,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2495

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 22, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

Ross M. Goodman, Judge.

Horace Young, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk February 6, 2013

t0130 

# Order

February 6, 2013

146047

- 8 & (44)

DEBRA L. HAGERTY, Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF DEBRA LOUISE HAGERTY

- KRAEMER, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146047

- 8 COA: 304369, 304439 Manistee CC: 10

- 014081

- NI BOARD OF MANISTEE COUNTY ROAD COMMISSIONERS, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the September 11, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to ap peal, we REVERSE that portion of the Court of Appeals judgment which held that the defendant is not entitled to the protection of governmental immunity, and we VACATE the remainder of the court’s analysis because it is unnecessary to the disposition of the case. The plaintiff’s decedent was fatally injured when the vehicle she was driving left an unpaved road in Manistee County and hit a tree. The plaintiff alleged that this accident occurred when an oncoming motorist caused a cloud of dust to rise

from t he roadway, causing the decedent to lose her orientation, drive into soft sand on the edge of the road, and veer off the roadway. This theory of causation failed to point to a condition of the highway in need of repair. A dust cloud rising from an unpave d road is not a defect in the physical structure of the roadbed, as required for liability to arise under the Governmental Tort Liability Act highway exception, MCL 691.1402(1). Nawrocki v
Macomb Co Rd Comm, 463 Mich 143, 176

- 177 (2000). Moreover, a plai ntiff cannot recover in a claim where the sole proximate cause of the injury is a natural substance that has accumulated over a highway. See Haliw v Sterling Heights, 464 Mich 297, 311 (2001). An accumulation of gravel, whether natural or otherwise, does not implicate the defendant’s duty to maintain the highway in “reasonable repair.” Paletta v Oakland Co
Rd Comm, 491 Mich 897 (2012); Estate of Buckner v City of Lansing, 480 Mich 1243 (2008). We REMAND this case to the Manistee Circuit Court for entry of an order granting summary disposition to the defendant pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7).
# Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

# SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of The X-Change Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Sheriff, President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Michael SheriffMichael Sheriff,
President, ChiefExecutive Officer , Treasurer and Chairman(Principal Executive
and Financial Officer)

August 9, 2004

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

F-25

---
SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 23.3

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Voice Control Systems, Inc.
Dallas, Texas

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-28721) of our report dated January 30, 1998,
relating to the financial statements of Voice Control Systems, Inc. appearing in
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1997.




                                                       /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
                                                       --------------------
                                                       BDO Seidman, LLP



Dallas, Texas
March 26, 1998


                                       27
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5598 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5598

   To exclude from gross income compensation provided by BP, PLC for 
victims of the explosion on and sinking of the mobile offshore drilling 
 unit Deepwater Horizon and the discharge of oil in the Gulf of Mexico 
     caused by such explosion and sinking, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2010

Mr. Melancon (for himself and Mr. Boyd) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To exclude from gross income compensation provided by BP, PLC for 
victims of the explosion on and sinking of the mobile offshore drilling 
 unit Deepwater Horizon and the discharge of oil in the Gulf of Mexico 
     caused by such explosion and sinking, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Oil Spill Tax Relief Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. GULF OIL SPILL COMPENSATION EXCLUDED FROM GROSS INCOME.

    For purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986--
            (1) the explosion on and sinking of the mobile offshore 
        drilling unit Deepwater Horizon and the discharge of oil in the 
        Gulf of Mexico caused by such explosion and sinking shall be 
        treated as a qualified disaster under section 139(c) of such 
        Code, and
            (2) any compensation provided by BP, PLC to a victim of 
        such disaster shall be treated as a qualified disaster relief 
        payment under section 139(b) of such Code.
                                 <all>
```
#### ROBERTS CO. v. MILLS, INC.

No. 135 PC.

Case below: 8 N.C. App. 612.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 September 1970.
#### CASUALTY CO. v. GRIFFIN

No. 282 PC

Case below: 46 NC App 826

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 15 August 1980.
# C_2007193EN.01000101.xml

| 21.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4612 — Accor/Pierre et Vacances/Newcity JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 193/01)

On 4 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4612. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4612. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JACLYN,
INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,101
<SECURITIES>                                     3,480
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,142
<ALLOWANCES>                                       626
<INVENTORY>                                      4,995
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,884
<PP&E>                                           4,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,775
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,433
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,369
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,994
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,931
<SALES>                                         54,697
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,896
<CGS>                                           41,310
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,662
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    742
<INCOME-TAX>                                       282
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                460
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       460
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Recent News & Stories             
  -  News Releases             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.01 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
#### STATE v. OWEN

No. 60 PC.

Case below: 24 N.C. App. 598.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 May 1975.
NUMBER 13-98-00374-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

PEDRO MONTANO, M.D., Appellant,

v.

DOLORES POGUE, Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 139th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This appeal was abated by this Court on December 3, 1998, due to the bankruptcy

of one of the parties to this appeal. See 11 U.S.C. § 362; see generally TEX. R. APP. P.

8. Since the abatement there has been no activity in this appeal. On April 16, 2009, the

Court ordered the parties to file an advisory regarding the status of the appeal and, if
2

applicable, a motion to reinstate the appeal or a motion to dismiss the appeal. The order

notified the parties that failure to respond to the order would result in reinstatement and

dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. 

The parties have failed to respond. Accordingly, we reinstate and dismiss the

appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this the 14th day of May, 2009.