alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6202** 

KEVIN RASHAAN HORSEY, SR. , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. SALISBURY POLICE DEPARTMENT; B. CATON, Officer; N. AMENDOLAGINE, Officer; DAVID UNDERWOOD, Officer; DRUG TASK FORCE , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. Ellen L. Hollander , District Judge. ( 1:14

- cv - 00147

- ELH )

Submitted : May 29, 2014 Decided: June 3, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Kevin Rashaan Horsey, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kevin Rashaan Horsey, Sr., appeals the district
court ’ s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice after concluding that his claims for damages were barred by Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477 (1994), and that his claims for injunctive relief were no t otherwise cognizable. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Horsey ’ s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Horsey has forfeited appell ate review of the court’s order. Accordingly , we affirm the district court ’ s judgment . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decis ional
process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7199

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DONNIE KEITH HOWELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CR-94-56-H)

Submitted: December 12, 2001 Decided: December 20, 2001

Before MICHAEL and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donnie Keith Howell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Donnie Keith Howell seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001)

and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States

v. Howell, No. CR-94-56-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2000 & Dec. 14, 2000).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

DOC U: , >. - :! I\ ..I. , "L TJ~F :.hl,i,l :: ,-. 3-z.,-d : 

_..*_--,_..+ -.-A cc----'- - ---...,,+--. -- -' 

------- -- -------------- ----X MDL No. 1789 

IN RE: Fosamax Products Liability : 

Lli t igat ion 

1: 07-cv-3395 (ZFF; 

Order 

-X 

;'his Docu-ent Relates KO: 

JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District Judge: 

Eefendant. Merck & '5. , Inc. [ "Merck" l mzTres 

pursuant TO Federal Rules of Civil Procedure I b If) , 

27 (b) !2) (c) , and 41 (b) to (lismiss t-he above--captioned Tase 

wl tk prejudice because of pl~int if f Jennifer Regarcif s 

(NPiLilntiff") fsilure to provide a Plair-tiff Profile Forn 

I "PPF" ) as i-equlre4 by Case Manag~?n~cnt Order NJ. 3 ( "CMO 

39 . Plaintlff has not opposei the mot~on. Fzr thc reaspns 

pro~~ided below, the mot io!~ is GliaiTED 

Sect~or! 10.3 of CMO 3 requires plalxtiffs In all 

cc~ses consn?idL~ted 11: thls multi-district lit~yatian to 

sub~ll t completed PPFs tc defense squrlsel within slxt;' 160) 

days from the date 'hat the plaintj ff's case 1s dii-ectl:~ 

filed with thls Co~yt or, for cases transferred to this 

2odrt, the date that the condlt~~r~al transfer order keccmcs 

firlal. 1;'MO 3 f~rther prqvides that Mpl-ck may send a 

deilciency l2tti.r to 2 plajntiff who has na: sukjmittcd a 

Case 1:07-cv-03295-JFK Document 25 Filed 03/20/2008 Page 1 of 2
cgmpleted PPF withir; sixty (6CJ days and, upon receipt of 

the def icie~cy letter, that plaint lf f has thirty days \ 30) 

to rure the def iclency . 

This case was transferred to this Court on April 

26, 2Od.7 and Plaintiff failed to submit a PPF with13 sixty 

(60) days of that transfer. Mcrck represents r hat it_ serlt 

d~fiui-ency ietLers to Plaintiff on July LO, 2007 and on 

Ailgusc i3, 2037 arid that plaint-iff still has not pro7/ided a 

PPF. OK Septembel- 5, 2037 Yerck filed and served Plaintiff 

w~~h the instant motion to dismiss the case with prejudice. 

Plalntif E has not opposed the motiarl. Accordingly, the 

moti~n is GWTED and the case is DISMISSEG WITH PREJUDllZE. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: New York, New York 

March 19, 2008 

V JOHN F. KEENAN 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03295-JFK Document 25 Filed 03/20/2008 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.14

M E M O R A N D U M
​
To:Tiffany Entsminger
​
From:George A. Mangiaracina
​
Date:October 7, 2020
​
Re:2020 Annual Salary and Bonus Target Summary
​
​
Base Salary:$400,000
​
Target Cash Bonus:$150,000
​
Target RSU Bonus
Award:Equivalent of $50,000 vesting over 3 years
​
Example:  $50,000 / $1.50 share price = 33,333 RSUs
​
Target Option Bonus
	Award:
	For every 1 RSU share awarded, 0.5 options will also be awarded with standard exercise price calculation


​
Example:  $50,000 / $1.50 share price = 33,333 RSUs
     33,333 RSUs / 2 = 16,666 options awarded vesting over 3 years
​
	Severance Terms:
	Change of Control: 12 months base salary and 12 months COBRA coverage.  Change of Control generally means an acquiring entity purchases more than 50% of the Common Stock of IMH and your position is eliminated within 12 months thereafter.


​
Termination without Cause: 6-12 months base salary at the discretion of the company and matching period for COBRA coverage.  Cause generally means a material reason to terminate your employment, such as a material violation of company policies and procedures.
​
Nothing contained herein modifies the at-will status of your employment with the company.
​
​
​
	​


	​



	/s/ Tiffany Entsminger 
	Date: October 7, 2020
​

	​
	​




​

​
EXHIBIT 32B


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of AutoInfo,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending  December 31, 2006 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  (SEC)  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  William
Wunderlich,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

A signed  original of this written  statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

/s/ William Wunderlich
----------------------
William Wunderlich
Chief Financial Officer
March 28, 2007
# L_2007148EN.01000501.xml

| 9.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 148/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 148/5

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 639/2007

of 8 June 2007

amending for the 78th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001 prohibiting the export of certain goods and services to Afghanistan, strengthening the flight ban and extending the freeze of funds and other financial resources in respect of the Taliban of Afghanistan (1) and in particular Article 7(1), first indent, thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 lists the persons, groups and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 lists the persons, groups and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation.

| (2) | On 1 June 2007, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to amend the list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. Annex I should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 1 June 2007, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to amend the list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. Annex I should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 June 2007.

For the Commission

Eneko LANDÁBURU

Director General for External Relations

---

(1)  
  OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p. 9. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 553/2007 (OJ L 131, 23.5.2007, p. 16).

1

---

ANNEX

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended as follows:

The entry ‘Abu Hafs the Mauritanian (aka Mahfouz Ould al-Walid, Khalid Al-Shanqiti, Mafouz Walad Al-Walid, Mahamedou Ouid Slahi); born 1.1.1975
  ’ under the heading ‘Natural persons’ shall be replaced by:

‘Mahfouz Ould Al-Walid (alias (a) Abu Hafs the Mauritanian, (b) Khalid Al-Shanqiti, (c) Mafouz Walad Al-Walid). Date of birth: 1.1.1975.’

---
**Exhibit 31(1)**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, David A. Woodle, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of C-COR Incorporated; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting,or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

 

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.24 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 217 (Thursday, November 10, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 68397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22490]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-821-802]


Extension of Time Limit for Sunset Review of the Agreement 
Suspending the Antidumping Investigation on Uranium from the Russian 
Federation

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 10, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sally Gannon, Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street & Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; (202) 482-0162.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Extension of Time Limit for Sunset Review:

    In accordance with section 751(c)(5)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 
as amended, (``the Act''), the U.S. Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') may extend the period of time for making its 
determination by not more than 90 days if it determines that the review 
is extraordinarily complicated. As set forth in section 751(c)(5)(C)(v) 
of the Act, the Department may treat a sunset review as extraordinarily 
complicated if it is a review of a transition order. A transition order 
is defined as any antidumping or countervailing duty order or 
suspension agreement that was in effect on January 1, 1995, the date on 
which the WTO Agreement entered into force with respect to the United 
States. See section 751(c)(6)(C) of the Act. The agreement suspending 
the antidumping investigation on uranium from the Russian Federation 
was in effect prior to January 1, 1995 and, as such, is a transition 
order. Therefore, the Department has determined, pursuant to section 
751(c)(5)(C)(v) of the Act, that the sunset review of the agreement 
suspending the antidumping investigation on uranium from the Russian 
Federation is extraordinarily complicated and requires additional time 
for the Department to complete its analysis. The Department will extend 
the deadlines in this proceeding and, as a result, intends to issue 
either the preliminary results of the full sunset review on January 17, 
2006 and the final results of the full sunset review on May 30, 2006, 
or the final results of the expedited review on January 27, 2006.
    This notice is issued in accordance with sections 751(c)(5)(B) and 
(C)(v) of the Act.

    Dated: November 3, 2005.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Director, Office of Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-22490 Filed 11-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 1 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 2 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 3 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 4 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 5 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 6 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 7 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 8 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 9 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 10 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 11 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 12 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 13 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 14 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 15 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 16 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 17 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 18 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 19 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 20 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 21 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 22 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 23 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 24 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 25 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 26 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 27 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 28 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 29 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 30 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 31 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 32 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 33 of 34

Case 1:07-cv-03343-RMB     Document 16-2      Filed 03/31/2008     Page 34 of 34
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 220 (Wednesday, November 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 69620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22736]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs; Public Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA), pursuant to the 
Veterans Entrepreneurship and Small Business Development Act of 1999 
(Pub. L. 106-50), Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs will 
host a second public meeting on November 15-17, 2005. The meeting will 
take place at the U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20416. The meeting on Tuesday, November 15, 2005 
and Wednesday, November 16, 2005 will start at 9 a.m. until 5 p.m., in 
the Eisenhower Conference Room, located on the 2nd floor. The meeting 
on Thursday, November 17, 2005 will start at 9 a.m. until noon, in the 
Administration's Conference Room, located on the 7th floor.
    Anyone wishing to attend must contact Cheryl Clark in writing or by 
fax. Cheryl Clark, Program Liaison, Office of Veterans Business 
Development, 409 3rd Street, SW., Washington, DC 204165, phone (202) 
205-6773), fax: (202) 481-6085, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b8dbd0ddcac1d496dbd4d9cad3f8cbdad996dfd7ce"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="45262d20373c296b262924372e053627246b222a33">[email protected]</span></a>.

Matthew K. Becker,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-22736 Filed 11-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>