alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 23.1


                      [MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP LETTERHEAD]




                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the April 24, 1996 
Registration Statement and related prospectus on Form S-2 of our report, 
dated February 7, 1997, which appears on page 22 of the annual report on Form 
10-K, relating to the financial statements of Richey Electronics, Inc. as of 
December 31, 1995 and 1996 and for each of the three years in the period 
ended December 31, 1996. We also consent to the reference to our Firm under 
the caption "Experts" appearing in the prospectus.

                                    MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

Pasadena, California
March 18, 1997
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1302

DERRICK ALLEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CORRECT CARE SOLUTION(S); NURSE SLADE; DURHAM CO. 

DETENTION FACILITY; SHERIFF CLARENCE F. BIRKHEAD; CAPTAIN 

RUSSELL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:21-cv-00146-TDS-LPA)

Submitted: July 20, 2021 Decided: July 22, 2021

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrick Michael Allen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Derrick Allen appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and dismissing Allen’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Allen v. Correct Care Sols., No. 1:21-

cv-00146-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Mar. 12, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.36

                               AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     This Agreement No. 3 is made as of September 11, 2000, by and between
Mercury Air Group, Inc., a New York corporation (hereinafter referred to as
"Employer"), and Mr. Joseph A. Czyzyk (hereinafter referred to as "Employee").

     WHEREAS, Employer and Employee entered into that certain Employment
Agreement dated November 15, 1994, as amended on October 15, 1998, and on April
12, 1999, (as amended, the "Employment Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS, Employer and Employee agree to amend the Employment Agreement to
reflect the wishes of the Compensation Committee of Employer to increase
Employee's Base Compensation by $250,000 and to enable the Employment Agreement
to continue in full force and effect.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree to amend the Employment Agreement
as follows:       The Base Compensation figure of $270,000 in Paragraph Third,
subparagraph (a) is hereby deleted and replaced by the Base Compensation figure
of $520,000.

     All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement remain
unchanged and in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day
and year first above written.

                                     MERCURY AIR GROUP, INC.


                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Dr. Phillip J. Fagan, Chairman of the Board




                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Joseph A. Czyzyk, Individually
#### Matthew A. LERMAN Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 04-7054.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 15, 2005.

*ORDER*

MAYER, Circuit Judge.

Matthew A. Lerman responds to the court’s order to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to *Richard v. West,*161 F.3d 719 (Fed.Cir.1998) (holding veteran’s claims for service-connected benefits do not survive veteran’s death). The Secretary of Veterans Affairs has not responded.

Lerman asks the court to direct the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims to vacate its decision and recall the judgment in *Lerman v. Principi,*00-145, and also direct the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims “to instruct the Board to vacate its decision.” “[Vjacateur must be decreed for those judgments whose review is, in the words of *Munsingwear,*‘prevented through happenstance.’” *U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Company v. Bonner Mall Partnership,*513 U.S. 18, 23, 115 S.Ct. 386, 130 L.Ed.2d 233 (1994) (quoting *United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.,*340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950)). Thus, here, where the veteran has died during the pendency of his appeal, the judgment on appeal must be vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims where any additional requests for relief should be pursued.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The case is vacated and remanded.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such a patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel, Contract Proposal Tech Review Panel on Meropenem.                    

*Date:*                         November 29, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         The Hotel Lombardy, 209 Pennsylvania Ave., Washington, DC 20006.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Kishena C. Wadhwani, PhD, MpH, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, 9000 Rockville Pike, MSC 7510, 6100 Building, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-7510. (301) 496-1485.                         *wadhwank@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 1, 2005.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-22486 Filed 11-9-05; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### HUNTWISE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MAT SPORTS, L.L.C. (doing business as Kodiak Island Series), Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-1476.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: March 18, 2005.

Before NEWMAN, MAYER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: *AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36
Exhibit
32.1






Section 1350 Certification
of Principal Executive Officer







The
undersigned, the Chairman, President and Treasurer of Jaco Electronics, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 (the “Quarterly Report”) accompanying
this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods presented as required by such report. The
foregoing certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities
as principal executive officer of the Company, my own due diligence and
representations made by certain other members of the Company’s senior
management.





Date:  November
18, 2008





/s/ Joel H.
Girsky


Joel H.
Girsky


Chairman,
President and Treasurer


(Principal
Executive Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BARBARA BASKIN,

Appellant,

v.

PRESIDIO COUNTY, TEXAS

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-24-00325-CV

Appeal from the

394th Judicial District Court

of Presidio County, Texas

(TC# 8244)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be 

dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. 

On September 3, 2024, the Clerk of this Court sent Appellant a letter requesting payment 

of the required filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless a 

party is excused by statute or by appellate rule from paying costs). The letter notified Appellant 

the appeal would be subject to dismissal if, on or after September 23, 2024, the fee remained 

unpaid, or Appellant failed to otherwise show an excuse from payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3 

(c) (authorizing an appellate court to dismiss an appeal where an appellant fails to comply with a 

notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time).
2

As of this date, Appellant has neither paid said fee nor shown she is excused. Accordingly, 

we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 43.3(c). 

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

September 27, 2024

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
Exhibit 23.3  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-65113, 333-84848, 333-96717, 333-110553 and 333-152296) on Forms S-8 of
Cache, Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2007, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule
of Cache, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph referring to the adoption of the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Cache, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 27, 2008.  /s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP  New
York, New York March 12,
2009
Exhibit(32)        Item 32 - Section 906 Certification.

KANSAS CITY LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY

SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION

                                                          First Quarter 2004

The undersigned certify
that the registrants Form 10-Q report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d)) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d) and that information contained in the report fairly represents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the registrant.

`/s/R. Philip Bixby           
R. Philip Bixby
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Vice Chairman of the Board




/s/Tracy W. Knapp            
Tracy W. Knapp
Senior Vice President, Finance`

Date:      May 7, 2004

A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Kansas City
Life Insurance Company and will be retained by Kansas City Life Insurance
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH     Document 18      Filed 06/28/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03340-RJH     Document 18      Filed 06/28/2007     Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cr-00356-RMB Document 12 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### IN RE MOORE

No. 67 PC.

Case below: 25 N.C. App. 36.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 May 1975.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED  PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated November 3, 2000 accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Oxboro Medical, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year end
September 30, 2000. As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of Oxboro Medical, Inc. on Form
S-3 (File No. 333-43616), filed August 11, 2000.

| |  | /s/LUND KOEHLER COX & ARKEMA, LLP
| |  | ---------------------------------

Minneapolis,
Minnesota
December 20, 2000

---

QuickLinks
# C_2007157EN.01000701.xml

| 10.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 157/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 157/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4344 — Lactalis/Nestlé/JV (II))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 157/05)

On 19 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4344. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4344. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
#### STATE v. CAUDLE

No. 42.

Case below: 7 N.C. App. 276.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 17 March 1970.
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
The X-Change Corporation
File No. 002-41703
Form 10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2010

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 -
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The X-Change Corporation (Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (Report),  I, Haviland  Wright,  Chief
Executive and Acting Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350,  adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Dated: August 12, 2010                    By: /s/ Haviland Wright
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Haviland Wright
                                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Acting Chief Financial Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to The  X-Change  Corporation  and will be  retained  by The  X-Change
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, v. Taiwan AUSTIN, Appellant.

No. 03-2659.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) Oct. 26, 2004.

Decided April 13, 2005.

William A. Behe, Office of United States Attorney, Harrisburg, PA, for United States of America.

Enid W. Harris, Harris *&*Van Jura, Kingston, PA, for Appellant.

Before SCIRICA, Chief Judge, FISHER and BECKER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCIRICA, Chief Judge.

Appellant Taiwan Austin pled guilty to unlawful possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The District Court sentenced Austin to 240 months in prison, three years supervised release, a $2000 fine, and a $100 special assessment. He does not contest his conviction or guilty plea.

Austin challenges his sentence under *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).1*454Having determined that the sentencing issues appellant raises are best determined by the District Court in the first instance, we will vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with *Booker.*

1

. We note that the government does not object to Austin’s request for resentencing. *See*Gov’t’s Letter of March 3, 2005 ("it would seem appropriate in this case that the district court, in light of *Booker,*be permitted to revisit the question of what would be an appropriate sentence to impose”).
Case 1:06-cv-14945-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14945-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14945-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14945-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14945-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14945-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14945-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14945-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14945-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14945-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14945-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14945-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14945-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
Exhibit 10.1.b

Amendment No. 1 to
[Restated] Severance Agreement

This Amendment No. 1 to the [Restated] Severance Agreement dated ____________ between Kansas City Power & Light Company, and _________________________, is being made effective as of October 1, 2001, to reflect the completion by Kansas City Power & Light Company, a Missouri corporation ("KCPL"), of a corporate restructuring to create a holding company structure. On October 1, 2001, KCPL entered into an agreement and plan of merger among KCPL, Great Plains Energy Incorporated, a Missouri corporation ("GPE"), and KCPL Merger Sub Incorporated, a Missouri corporation ("Merger Sub") and wholly owned subsidiary of GPE. As a result of the merger, KCPL became a direct wholly owned subsidiary of GPE. Immediately following the merger, GPE became the successor of KCPL with respect to the rights and obligations of Kansas City Power & Light Company under the (AgreementName) Agreement.

GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATEDBy:          /s/Bernard J. Beaudoin
                Bernard J. Beaudoin

KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANYBy:          /s/Bernard J. Beaudoin
                Bernard J. Beaudoin



OFFICER:______________________________________

Subscribed and Sworn to before me this 
_________ day of ___________________.
_________________________________
                   Notary Public
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 213 (Friday, November 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 67181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21991]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Targeting Inflammation.
    Date: November 21, 2005.
    Time: 3 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Maxine A. Lesniak, MPH, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of 
Health, Room 756, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, 
(301) 594-7792, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#422e27312c2b23292f02273a3630236c2c2b2626296c2c2b2a6c252d34"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fc90998f92959d9791bc9984888e9dd29295989897d2929594d29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 28, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-21991 Filed 11-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD     Document 1      Filed 04/25/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD     Document 1      Filed 04/25/2007     Page 2 of 2