alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

# Soldier Accounted For From Korean War (Lacsamana, M.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Case 1:06-cv-14915-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
| 1.   | The Report is not in compliance with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the reasons discussed in Note 1B of the financial statements; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in theAnnual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Somerset International Group, Inc. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                  | SOMERSET INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. |                                |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                                                                                  |                               |                                |   |
| Date:           March 31, 2011 | By:                                | /s/ John X. Adiletta                |   |
|                                                                                  |                               | John X. Adiletta                    |   |
|                                                                                  |                               | President, Chief Executive Officer, |   |
|                                                                                  |                               | Chief Financial Officer             |   |

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50439 Summary Calendar

J.C. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MARGO FRASIER, Sheriff; TEXAS COMMISSION OF JAIL STANDARDS; TRAVIS COUNTY COMMISSIONER’S COURT; TRAVIS COUNTY HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-00-CV-402-SS

-------------------- August 30, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * J. C. Carter (“Carter”), Texas prisoner # 56736, has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on appeal following the district court’s decision granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. By moving for IFP status, Carter is challenging the district court’s certification that IFP status should not beNo. 01-50439 -2- granted on appeal because his appeal is not taken in good faith.
See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Carter failed to produce evidence showing that the defendants had deprived him of the products necessary to meet his basic hygienic needs. See Hare v. City of Corinth , 74 F.3d 633, 650 (5 th Cir. 1996)(en banc). Thus, he has failed to show that his appeal of the district court’s dismissal of his complaint is taken in good faith. Accordingly, Carter’s request for IFP status is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh , 117 F.3d at 202 & n.24; 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Carter was previously warned that he had accumulated two strikes for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that if he accumulated three strikes, he would not be allowed to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal while he was incarcerated or detained unless he was under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See Carter v. Fraiser , No. 00-51313 (5th Cir. June 13, 2001). The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous constitutes a third strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). Carter is BARRED from proceeding IFP in any civil action or appeal while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) BAR IMPOSED.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Strategic Internet
Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"). I, Abbas Salih, Director of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

| | Date: May 19,
      2011 | /s/
      Abbas Salih          
| | ------------------------ | -------------------------------
| |                          | Abbas Salih, Director, CEO, CFO

---
<PAGE>   1




                                                                    EXHIBIT 10




                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



         THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("Amendment") is entered into as
of May 26, 2000, between JACOBSON STORES INC., a Michigan corporation of
Jackson, Michigan (the "Company"), and THEODORE R. KOLMAN, of Jackson, Michigan
("Kolman").

         THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE that the Executive Employment Agreement
between them dated as of April 11, 2000 (the "Agreement"), is amended effective
April 16, 2000, as follows:

                  COMPENSATION. The annual rate of $185,000 in paragraph 2 of
the Agreement is amended to read an annual rate of $200,000.

         Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue in
full force and effect.


IN THE PRESENCE OF:                JACOBSON STORES INC.


/s/  Paul W. Gilbert               By:   /s/  P. Gerald Mills
---------------------                  ----------------------------------------
                                         P. Gerald Mills
                                   Its:  Chairman of the Board and
                                         Chief Executive Officer


/s/  Dana J. Collins                     /s/  Theodore R. Kolman
---------------------                   ---------------------------------------
                                         Theodore R. Kolman
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                                [NSA LETTERHEAD]

                CONSENT OF NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.

         We hereby consent to (i) the references in this Form 10-K of Plains
Resources Inc., as well as in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included in such Form 10-K, to our reserve reports to the interest
of Plains Resources Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively the "Company"),
relating to the estimated quantities of certain of the Company's proved
reserves of oil and gas and present values thereof for certain periods (the
"Reserve Reports"), and (ii) the incorporation by reference of the Reserve
Reports into Plains Resources Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statements
on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-80364, 33-84064, 333-01851, 333-42773, 333-42767,
333-65939 and 333-33804) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-43788, 33-48610, 33-53802,
33-06191, 333-27907, 333-45558, 333-45582 and 333-66602).


                                      NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.



                                      By:  /s/ J. Carter Henson, Jr.
                                         --------------------------------------
                                               J. Carter Henson, Jr.
                                               Senior Vice President

Houston, Texas
March 26, 2003
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, J. David Berkley, the President of Sterion Incorporated (the Company) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    J. David Berkley

Title:  President, Sterion Incorporated

Dated:  December 30, 2002



I, Mark Buckrey, the Chief Financial Officer of Sterion Incorporated (the Company) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that the Company s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    Mark Buckrey

Title:  Chief Financial Officer, Sterion Incorporated

Dated:  December 30, 2002
Exhibit
32.1








KNIGHT
INC.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906


OF
THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knight Inc. (the “Company”)
for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity
and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Knight Inc. and will be retained by Knight Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








Dated:  May
      15, 2008
            
            /s/
      Richard D. KinderRichard
      D. Kinder
              Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION

I, William I. Miller, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Irwin Financial Corporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
          c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

_______/s/ William I. Miller_________________WILLIAM I. MILLER
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 12, 2003
#### GREGORY LEWIS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. SAMUEL CULVERSON, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 9850

No. 9994

December 7, 1978

588 P.2d 541

*728*Houston & Moran,*Las Vegas, for Appellant Lewis.

*Swanson & Momot, Ltd.,*Las Vegas, for Appellant Culver-son.

*Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *George E. Holt,*District Attorney, and *H. Leon Simon,*Chief Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Appellants stand convicted, by jury verdict, of robbery (NRS 200.380) and having used a deadly weapon in the commission of that crime (NRS 193.165).1 Appellants contend we are compelled to reverse their convictions because (1) their constitutional rights to due process of law were violated; (2) the district court erred in instructing the jury; and, (3) the district court erred in denying their motions for a new trial. We disagree.

*7291. Appellants contend (a) they were denied due process of law because the prosecuting attorney knowingly allowed perjured testimony to be admitted at trial and, (b) the prosecuting attorney suppressed material evidence which would have impeached the victim’s testimony. Appellants have failed to present any facts to support these contentions.

2. Appellants failed to object to the alleged improper instruction at the time it was given to the jury. Where, as here, the giving of an instruction to the jury does not constitute plain error, the failure to object precludes appellate consideration. Cutler v. State, 93 Nev. 329, 566 P.2d 809 (1977).

3. Finally, appellants contend they were entitled to a new trial because three jurors discussed the testimony and evidence adduced at trial before the case had been submitted to them for deliberation.

At the hearing on the motion for a new trial, the three jurors each testified that his or her decision was based solely upon the evidence presented at trial. In addition, the record fails to indicate that the discussion either affected the jurors’ deliberations or otherwise prejudiced appellants’ right to a fair trial. Under these circumstances, we perceive no abuse of the trial court’s discretion in denying appellants’ motion for a new trial. *See*Atwell v. State, 354 So.2d 30 (Ala.Crim.App. 1977). *Cf.*Sorce v. State, 88 Nev. 350, 497 P.2d 902 (1972).

The judgments are affirmed.

1

Pursuant to stipulation of counsel, these cases were consolidated for appeal.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7566

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

REGINALD LEVI AVENT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:99-cr-00011-RAJ-1)

Submitted: February 5, 2016 Decided: February 25, 2016

Before KEENAN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Levi Avent, Appellant Pro Se. Dana James Boente, 

Acting United States Attorney, Kevin Michael Comstock, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Levi Avent appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence 

reduction pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual, App. C. 

Amend. 782 (2015). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error because Amendment 782 is not applicable to 

sentences, such as Avent’s sentence, derived from the career 

offender provisions in the Sentencing Guidelines. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United 

States v. Avent, No. 2:99-cr-00011-RAJ-1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 27, 

2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
#### In re Hans PANNEKOEK, Cornelis L. Verweij, Paul J. Diergaarde, and Margaretha H.L. Hart.

No. 04-1426.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: March 2, 2005.

*ORDER*

The Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“Director” and “USPTO”) moves unopposed to revise the official caption and to participate in the appeal since the appeal is now in the nature of an *ex parte*challenge of a Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences decision. The Director also moves jointly to remand the case to the USPTO for further proceedings.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motions are granted.

(2) The revised official caption is reflected above.

(3) Each party will bear its own costs.
#### STATE v. MARTIN

No. 2

Case below: 2 N.C. App. 148.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 29 October 1968.
#### IN RE HENNIS

No. 6 PC.

Case below: 6 N.C. App. 683.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 11 February 1970.
#### STITH v. PERDUE

No. 30 PC.

Case below: 7 N.C. App. 314.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 April 1970.