alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.2





**Certification
      of CEO and CFO Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kansas City
      Power & Light Company (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended
      March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
      date
      hereof (the "Report"), William H. Downey, as President and Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, and Terry Bassham, as Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
      of
      his knowledge:





(1)       The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                William H. DowneyName:
              Title:
            William
                H. Downey
              President
                and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
            May
                9, 2007/s/
                Terry BasshamName:
              Title:
            Terry
                Bassham
              Chief
                Financial OfficerDate:
            May
                9, 2007





This
      certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      and
      is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
      This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liability under that
      section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
      into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 except to the extent this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and specifically
      incorporated by reference in any such filing.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Kansas City Power & Light Company
      and will be retained by Kansas City Power & Light Company and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

# Airman Accounted For From World War II (Best, W.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Exhibit
10.21


 


Certain
personally identifiable information contained in this document, marked by brackets as [***], has been omitted from this exhibit pursuant
to Item 601(a)(6) under Regulation


S-K.








 


Amendment
to Employment Agreement


 


	Between	 	and	






	 	MoonLake
    Immunotherapeutics AG	 	Arnout
    Ploos van Amstel	 
	 	Untermüli
    7 / Postfach 7444	 	[***]	 
	 	6302
    Zug, Switzerland	 	 	 
	 	(“Employer”)	 	(“Employee”)	 



 


(together
hereinafter referred to as the “Parties”)


 


The
employee hereby agrees and accepts the following terms with regards to the Swiss employee benefit schemes put in place by the employer.
The herewith stated terms shall clarify or, if specified, substitute the previously agreed terms of the Employment Agreement that was
signed by the Parties on April 30, 2021.


 


	Clarification	to
                                            Section 6 – Pension fund:



 





	-	The
                                            Employer enrols the Employee as per the starting date of the employment into the “AXA
                                            - Basis Management” pension plan (pension scheme provided as Annex 1).



 


	Clarification	to
                                            Section 10 – Salary payment in the event of illness or accident:



 





	-	The
                                            Employer has taken out daily sickness benefits insurance with the following terms:



 


	 	○	Insured
                                            salary up to maximum of 300’000 CHF






	 	○	Daily
                                            sick leave allowance in the amount of 80% of the max. insured salary after a 30 days waiting
                                            period for a maximum of 730 days






	 	○	Premium
to be borne by employer/employee at 50%/50% split



 


	-	The
                                            Employer has taken out occupational and non-occupational accident insurance with the following
                                            terms:



 


	 	○	Insured
salary up to maximum of 400’000 CHF per person






	 	○	Daily
accident allowance in the amount of 80% of the max. insured salary after a 2 days waiting period






	 	○	Premium
for occupational accident insurance to be solely borne by employer, premium for non-occupational accidents insurance to be solely borne
by employee



 


	-	The
                                            above stated terms shall substitute the terms laid out in Section 10 of the employment agreement.



 


The
Employer may unilaterally amend or supplement the company benefits scheme at any time but will inform the employee accordingly.


 


	Basel,
21-9-21		/s/ Arnout
                                            Ploos van Amstel






	Place
and date		Arnout
                                            Ploos van Amstel
Case 1:07-cv-03328-CM-HBP     Document 57      Filed 07/11/2008     Page 1 of 1
prdo-ex102_58.htm





 

Exhibit 10.2

DATE

PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

EMPLOYEE NAME

ADDRESS

ADDRESS

Dear EMPLOYEE NAME,

[Intro language regarding purpose of the Retention Bonus Award].  

Specifically, in consideration for your continued active employment in good standing with CEC Employee Group, LLC (“CEG”), providing services for PEC, which services shall include but not be limited to the successful performance of your day-to-day responsibilities, as well as such additional duties as may be assigned to you through the date below, you will be eligible for retention bonus payment(s) under the terms and conditions set forth below.

Retention Bonus Award

You have been granted the following Retention Bonus Award:

[Amount of retention bonus]

[Payment terms of retention bonus]

This award will vest in accordance with the terms set forth above and shall be paid in cash within fifteen (15) days of the date(s) listed above, so long as you are still employed in good standing by CEG as of the vesting date.

If you leave the Company for any reason (including by voluntary resignation or involuntary termination by the Company), at any time prior to the time any of the above contingencies have been met, you will not be entitled to any portion of the Retention Bonus Award which did not vest prior to your separation from the Company.    

In addition, notwithstanding anything contained herein, you will remain an employee-at-will.  This means you are free to terminate your employment at any time, for any reason, and the Company retains the same right.

By signing this letter and returning a copy [DATE], you acknowledge that you have read, understand and agree to the terms set forth herein.  We appreciate your continued dedication to the Company.

Sincerely,

[Name]

[Title]





 



 

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:

 

 

_______________________________________________

NameDate
#### LaROQUE v. LaROQUE

No. 220 PC.

Case below: 46 N.C. App. 578.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 15 July 1980.
Case 1:07-cv-03288-RPP Document 20 Filed 03/13/2008 Page 1 of 1
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (1.67 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROSA SERRANO D/B/A 

THE LENS FACTORY,

 Appellant,

v.

PELLICANO BUSINESS PARK, L.L.C.,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-13-00201-CV

Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 7

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2012DCV06341)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Rosa Serrano d/b/a The Lens Factory is attempting to appeal an order removing a lien. 

Finding that this is not an appealable interlocutory order, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction and deny as moot Serrano’s motion to reconsider her request for emergency relief. 

Appellate courts generally have jurisdiction over final judgments, and such interlocutory 

orders as the Legislature deems appealable by statute. See TEX.CIV.PRAC.&REM.CODE ANN. 

§ 51.014 (West Supp. 2012); Ruiz v. Ruiz, 946 S.W.2d 123, 124 (Tex.App.--El Paso 1997, no 

pet.). Serrano is attempting to appeal an order vacating a lien entered pursuant to Section 

53.160(e) of the Texas Property Code. See TEX.PROP.CODE ANN. § 53.160 (West Supp. 2012). 

Section 53.160(e) expressly prohibits an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order. 

TEX.PROP.CODE ANN. § 53.160(e)(“A party to the proceeding may not file an interlocutory 

appeal from the court’s order.”). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
- 2 -

October 30, 2013

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
**Exhibit 32 (2)**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the AnnualReport of C-COR Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William T. Hanelly, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

September 13, 2006 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Past Conflicts             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns             
  -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing 
-  News & Stories    -  Recent News & Stories             
  -  News Releases             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## News Release

# USS Oklahoma Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Overley, L.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### David BROWN and Rita Brown, Plaintiffs, v. RAUSCHER PIERCE REFSNES, INC.; William H. Brashears, Defendants.

No. 91-376-CIV-T-17(A).

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division.

June 19, 1991.

Stanley Theodore Padgett, Trenam, Simmons, Kemker, Scharf, Barkin, Frye & O’Neill, P.A., Tampa, Fla., for plaintiffs.

Bruce W. Collins, Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, Dallas, Tex., for defendants.

ORDER

KOYACHEVICH, District Judge.

This cause is before the court on Plaintiffs’ motion to vacate or modify an arbitration award before the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).

The arbitration panel awarded $16,000 in damages and $4,000 in forum fees to Plaintiffs without explanation. This has led to sharp dispute between the parties. Plaintiffs contend that the award ignores the statutory damages formulas provided for their claim under Fla.Stat. §§ 517.12 and 517.211. They ask the court to vacate the award and grant damages consistent with the statutory formula which they calculate as $721,762.91. Defendants suggest, however, a number of bases on which the arbitrators may have made a smaller award.

In light of the confusion surrounding this award, the Court remands this case to the arbitration panel for clarification pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 10(e). *Ainsworth v. Skurnick,*909 F.2d 456, 457 (11th Cir.1990) (“When an arbitration award can be interpreted in a variety of ways, it is normal to *1083remand for clarification.”).1 is Accordingly,

ORDERED that this case be remanded for clarification to the original NYSE arbitration panel.

DONE and ORDERED.

1

. The court notes with dismay the confusion in the 11th Circuit on this issue. *See Raiford v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.,*903 F.2d 1410, 1413 (11th Cir.1990) (“We think that recommitting cases such as this to the arbitration panel for explanation would defeat the policy in favor of expeditious arbitration. When the parties agreed to submit to arbitration, they also agree to accept whatever reasonable uncertainties might arise from the process.")
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5176 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to prohibit States and Territories 

from classifying self-employed individuals as employees under State collective bargaining laws. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2010 

Mr. HOEKSTRA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to prohibit 

States and Territories from classifying self-employed individuals as employees under State collective bargaining 

laws. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family and Inde5 pendent Business Protection Act of 2010’’. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5176 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CLASSIFICATION OF SELF-EM2 PLOYED INDIVIDUALS AS EMPLOYEES. 

3 Section 14 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

4 U.S.C. 164) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, 

7 no State or territory may define or classify any person 

8 as an employee of the State or Territory for purposes of 

9 the employment, labor relations, or collective bargaining 

10 laws or regulations of that State or territory, by reason 

11 of such person’s receipt of or eligibility for any payment 

12 or subsidy funded in whole or in part by the United 

13 States.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP     Document 20      Filed 10/02/2006     Page 1 of 2

Case 2:05-cv-09559-VM-HBP     Document 20      Filed 10/02/2006     Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Science  Dynamics  Corporation (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Alan C. Bashforth,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


March 31, 2005                          /s/ Alan Bashforth
                                        ----------------------
                                        Alan C. Bashforth
                                        Chief Financial Officer