alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[J

- 11

- 2018] [MO: Dougherty, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT,

Appellant

v.

JET

- SET RESTAURANT, LLC,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 61 MAP 2017

Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court dated April 13, 2017 at No. 575 CD 2016 Affirming the Order of the Berks County Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division, dated March 15, 2016, docketed March 16, 2016, at No. 15

- 17486.

ARGUED: May 17, 2018

DISSENTING OPINION

JUSTICE MUNDY DECIDED: August 21, 2018

I join Justice Baer’s dissenting opinion in full. As Justice Baer notes, the 2003

amendments added four additional instances of the word “frequent” to 47 P .S. § 4

-
493(14). Utilizing the definition of “ frequent ” set forth in Appeal of Speranza , 206 A.2d

292 (Pa. 1965) results in a nonsensical construction of the statute as fully discussed by

Justice Bae r

. See Dissenting Op

. of Baer, J. at 5

- 7. I write separately to emphasize that

a reading contrary to that outlined by the dissent results in a law that allows violations to

occur on two occasions without penalty, before a citation is issued on the third occasion

.

Section 4

- 493(14) clearly intends to penalize licensed establishment s for allowing

the admission of minors unless one of the enumerated exceptions applies

. To interpret

the Act otherwise is to ignore the directive that it be con strued to accomplish its purpose:

“ protection of the welfare, health, peace and morals of the people of the Commonwealth.”

47 P.S. § 1

- 104.[ J

- 11

- 2018, 61 MAP 2017 ] [MO: Dougherty, J.]

- 2

Further, the Speranza definition is impractical to implement as it requires a system

for tallying and tracking infractions prior to issuing a citation. Instantly, the

Commonwealth Court noted that “Jet

- Set was cited for permitting a minor to be present

in a licensed premises on two occasions in 2014.” Cmwlth Ct. Op. at 5. Because it was

not Jet

- Set’s third known instance of allowing minors to be present , the Commonwealth

Court determined no violation of Section 4

- 49 3(13) had occurred and the citation was

improper. In my view, it is unlikely that the General Asse mbly intended to condone

allowing licensed premises to knowingly admit m inors into their establishments unless

one of the Section 4

- 493(13) exceptions was met

. For the foregoing reasons, I

respectfully dissent.

Justice Baer joins this dissenting opinion

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1995
<CASH>                                          35,876
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,979
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 473,524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,508
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        130
<COMMON>                                        52,721
<OTHER-SE>                                     394,165
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   473,524
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,463
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,179
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,284
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,284
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,284
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


            SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


The undersigned, Executive Vice President, Finance and Secretary of Jaco
Electronics, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Quarterly
Report") accompanying this certification fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the dates and for the periods presented as required by such
report. The foregoing certification is based upon, among other things, my
responsibilities as principal financial officer of the Company, my own due
diligence and representations made by certain other members of the Company's
senior management.


Date: May 15, 2006

                               /s/ Jeffrey D. Gash
                               -----------------------------------------------
                               Jeffrey D. Gash
                               Executive Vice President, Finance and Secretary
                               (Principal Financial Officer)
U.S. Department of Labor Employment Standards Administration 

 Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs

 Division of Longshore and 

 Harbor Workers’ Compensation 

 Washington, D.C. 20210

 

Working for America’s Workforce 

January 3, 2003 

Notice No. 106 

NOTICE TO INSURANCE CARRIERS AND SELF-INSURED EMPLOYERS UNDER THE 

LONGSHORE AND HARBOR WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ACT, AND OTHER INTERESTED 

PERSONS 

SUBJECT: Consolidation of the Longshore Program in the 

 Midwest Region of the Office of Workers’ 

Compensation Programs (OWCP) 

Effective January 20, 2003, the operation of the Longshore Program 

in the Midwest Region of the OWCP will be restructured. The claims 

management and dispute resolution functions of the Longshore Program 

district office currently located in Chicago, Illinois (District 

10), will be consolidated into the Longshore district office located 

in Houston, Texas (District 8) of the Southwest Region. This 

restructuring is made in accordance with 20 CFR § 701.102(a)(see 60 

FR 51348 dated October 2, 1995), and will result in a more efficient 

allocation of limited resources within the Longshore Program. 

Effective with this change the Longshore Program’s Houston District 

Office has jurisdiction over past and future cases under the 

Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act and its extensions 

arising in the States of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, 

Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, Kansas, and Nebraska. The 

Chicago sub-office, under the supervision of the Houston Longshore 

District Director, will continue to receive forms, filings, and 

correspondence at the same address: 

Chris Gleasman, District Director 

 U.S. Department of Labor, ESA 

 Longshore & Harbor Workers’ Compensation Office 

 230 South Dearborn St., Room 872 

 Chicago, IL 60604 

 Telephone: (312) 596-7153 

All questions concerning the processing of claims under this 
U.S. Department of Labor Employment Standards Administration 

 Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs

 Division of Longshore and 

 Harbor Workers’ Compensation 

 Washington, D.C. 20210

 

Working for America’s Workforce 

restructuring should be directed to OWCP Regional Director 

E. Martin Walker at (972) 850-2410. 

MICHAEL NISS 

Director, Division of 

Longshore and Harbor 

Workers’ Compensation
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ameriprise Certificate Company (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2022, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Abu M. Arif, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James R. Hill, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:May 2, 2022By:/s/ Abu M. ArifAbu M. ArifChief Executive Officer


Date:May 2, 2022By:/s/ James R. HillJames R. HillChief Financial Officer
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

EMPLOYMENT STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION 

Office of Workers' Compensation Programs W'ashington, D.C. 2021 l 

July 15, 1976 Notice No. 25 

Notice to Insurance Carriers, Self-Insured Employers 

Under the Longshoremen's Compensation Act, and Other 

Interested Parties 

Subject: Rehabilitation, New Reporting Procedure under the 

Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation 

Act, as Amended 

This notice is to advise interested parties that effective 

October 1, 1976, the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs 

(OWCP), Employment Standards Administration, will begin 

implementing the procedures described herein, and in the 

attached information paper, concerning rehabilitation under 

the amended Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation 

Act. These procedures will be followed in all instances 

described below in which an injury of a covered employee 

was sustained after August 1, 1976. The objective of this 

procedure is the early identification of permanently disabled 

employees in need of rehabilitation, and to insure a structured 

and comprehensive approach to assist them in the swiftest 

restoration to employment with a minimum residual disability. 

It is vital that every Longshore Act claim be reviewed by 

the insurance carrier or self-insurer as soon as it is 

filed with them, to determine whether a rehabilitation 

program is indicated and if so, to promptly initiate the 

program. A three-part Form, LS-222, "Carrier's or SelfInsurer's Report on Rehabilitation to Deputy Commissioner" 

(R Form) will be utilized and will reflect the positive 

steps taken by the carrier or self-insurer toward the 

consideration and implementation of a rehabilitation program. 

This form (LS-222) must be submitted in duplicate to the 

Deputy Commissioner, whose address will be shown in item 14, 

in all cases in which medical rehabilitation services have 

been initiated, as rehabilitation services are deemed 

necessary, but in any event, in all cases in which the 

injured employee has received compensation payments for more 

than two months and has not returned to work. 
- 2 -

A copy of the Form LS-222 is also attached for your information. A limited initial supply of the forms may be 

obtained from the district offices of the Office of Workers' 

Compensation Programs. Carriers and self-insurers are 

authorized to print the forms and are responsible for 

maintaining an adequate supply to serve their needs. 

JOHN E. STOC:KER 

Associate Director for Longshore 

and Harbor Workers' Compensation 

Attachments
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 17 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 17 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 217 (Thursday, November 10, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68449-68450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22565]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act; Meetings

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 at 9:30 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (ninth floor).

STATUS: This hearing will be open to the public.

MATTER BEFORE THE COMMISSION: 
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Definitions of ``Solicit'' and 
``Direct.''

    Note: This meeting will begin at 2:30 p.m.


DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 at 2:30 p.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 
Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C.
Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, November 17, 2005 at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (ninth floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 
Correction and Approval of Minutes.
Advisory Opinion 2005-16: Fired Up! LLC, by counsel, Marc E. Elias and 
Brian G. Svoboda.
Advisory Opinion 2005-18: U.S. Representative Silvestre Reyes.
Routine Administrative Matters.

[[Page 68450]]


PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-22565 Filed 11-8-05; 3:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M