alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 211 (Wednesday, November 2, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 66331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21553]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 05-2691, MB Docket No. 05-122, RM-11198]


Radio Broadcasting Services: Columbus and Monona, WI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: At Media Division dismisses the Petition for Rule Making filed 
by Good Karma Broadcasting, LLC, proposing the reallotment of Channel 
263A from Columbus to Monona, Wisconsin, and the modification of 
Station WTLX(FM)'s license accordingly. See 709 FR 17046, April 4, 
2005. It is not conducive to the efficient processing of petitions for 
rule making for the Commission to accept an ungranted construction 
permit application as a ``backfill'' to replace the prospective loss of 
a sole local service of a community.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MB Docket No. 05-122, adopted October 12, 2005, and 
released October 14, 2005. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and 
Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, 
Washington, DC 20054, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or http://www.BCPIWEB.com. This document is not subject to the Congressional 
Review Act. (The Commission, is, therefore, not required to submit a 
copy of this Report and Order to GAO, pursuant to the Congressional 
Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) because the proposed rule was 
dismissed.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 05-21553 Filed 11-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### STATE v. STARNES

No. 6 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 750.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 31 January 1977.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE HANOVER
DIRECT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND
STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 25, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-25-1999
<CASH>                                           2,849
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,587
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,300)
<INVENTORY>                                     54,816
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,492
<PP&E>                                          93,247
<DEPRECIATION>                                (46,360)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 191,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,502
<BONDS>                                         39,578
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,318
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       141,013
<OTHER-SE>                                    (93,466)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   191,419
<SALES>                                        549,852
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               549,852
<CGS>                                          228,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  554,226
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,382
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,817
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,784)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      530
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,314)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,314)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 11

             INTERNATIONAL MULTIFOODS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                Computation of Earnings (Loss) per Common Share
                                   (unaudited)

                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)




                                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                     ------------------
                                                      May 31,    May 31,
                                                       1998       1997
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Average shares of 
  common stock outstanding                            18,765     18,016
Common stock equivalents                                   -        103
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total common stock and equivalents
  assuming full dilution                              18,765     18,119
=======================================================================
Net earnings (loss)
  applicable to common stock                        $(24,301)   $ 2,000
=======================================================================
Earnings (loss) per
  share of common stock:
    Basic                                           $  (1.30)   $   .11
    Diluted                                         $  (1.30)   $   .11
=======================================================================
Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing net earnings (loss)
by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during 
the period.  

Diluted earnings per share are computed similar to basic earnings per share 
except that the weighted average shares outstanding are increased to include 
additional shares from the assumed exercise of stock options, if dilutive.  
The number of additional shares is calculated by assuming that outstanding 
stock options were exercised and the proceeds from such exercises were used 
to acquire shares of common stock at the average market price during the 
period.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 217 (Thursday, November 10, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68510-68511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22449]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Ex Parte No. 656 (Sub-No. 1)]


Investigation into the Practices of the National Classification 
Committee

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT.

ACTION: Extension of deadline for filing comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board is extending, by 14 days, the deadline for filing 
the comments requested in its decision served on October 13, 2005, and 
published in the Federal Register on October 19, 2005, at 70 FR 60881-
82.

DATES: The deadline for filing opening comments in this proceeding is 
extended to December 2, 2005. The deadline for filing a reply by the 
National Classification Committee is extended to December 22, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Any filing submitted in this proceeding must refer to STB Ex 
Parte No. 656 (Sub-No. 1) and must be submitted either via the Board's 
e-filing format or in the traditional paper format. Any person using e-
filing should comply with the instructions found on the Board's http://www.stb.dot.gov Web site, at the ``E-FILING'' link. Any person 
submitting a filing in the traditional paper format should send an 
original and 10 paper copies of the filing (and also an IBM-compatible 
floppy disk with any textual submission in any version of either 
Microsoft Word or WordPerfect) to: Surface Transportation Board, 1925 K 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. Because all comments will be 
posted to the Board's Web site, persons filing them with the Board need 
not serve them on other participants but must furnish a hard copy on 
request to any participant.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar (202) 565-1609. 
(Federal Information Relay Service for the hearing impaired: 1-800-877-
8339.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information appears in the 
Board's decision granting this deadline extension and in the Board's 
prior decision served on October 13, 2005, and posted on the Board's 
Web site at http://www.stb.dot.gov, both under

[[Page 68511]]

docket number STB Ex Parte No. 656 (Sub-No. 1). Board filings, 
decisions, and notices are available at this site.
    This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the 
human environment or the conservation of energy resources.

    Decided: November 4, 2005.

    By the Board, Vernon A. Williams, Secretary.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-22449 Filed 11-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Notice of Charter Renewal.

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory                               ( print page 67462)                            Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and in accordance with title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulations, section 102-3.65, and following consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat of the General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the National Coal Council has been renewed for a two-year period ending November 1, 2007. The Council will continue to provide advice, information, and recommendations to the Secretary of Energy on a continuing basis regarding general policy matters relating to coal issues.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Council members are chosen to assure a well-balanced representation from all sections of the country, all segments of the coal industry, including large and small companies, and commercial and residential consumers. The Council also has diverse members who represent interests outside the coal industry, including environmental interests, labor research, and academia. Membership and representation of all interests will continue to be determined in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and implementing regulations.

The renewal of the Council has been determined essential to the conduct of the Department's business and in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the Department of Energy by law. The Council will continue to operate in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and implementing regulations.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rachel M. Samuel at 202/586-3279.

Issued at Washington, DC on November 1, 2005.

James N. Solit,

Advisory Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-22118 Filed 11-4-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Interstate Power and Light Company (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ William D. Harvey

William D. Harvey

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

/s/ Patricia L. Kampling

Patricia L. Kampling

Vice President-Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

 

May 4, 2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6033

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CLARENCE EDWARD HAYNES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-90-30-A, CA-95-1109-AM)

Submitted: April 29, 1999 Decided: May 4, 1999

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Joseph Link, Jr., Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellant.

Bernard James Apperson, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,

Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Edward Haynes seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Haynes’

motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Haynes,

Nos. CR-90-30-A; CA-95-1109-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 17, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

Solely for the purposes of
complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Jilco Industries, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the quarter ended October 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 29, 2006                                                      
|                                                                           
|/s/ Martha Kretzmer                                                        
|Martha Kretzmer Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 216 (Wednesday, November 9, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 67905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22262]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 9222]
RIN 1545-BD49


Guidance Under Section 951 for Determining Pro Rata Share; 
Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to final regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects final regulations (TD 9222) that were 
published in the Federal Register on Thursday, August 25, 2005 (70 FR 
49864).
    The final regulations under section 951(a) of the Internal Revenue 
Code (Code) provide guidance for determining a United States 
shareholder's pro rata share of a controlled foreign corporation's 
(CFC's) subpart F income, previously excluded subpart F income 
withdrawn from investment in less developed countries, and previously 
excluded subpart F income withdrawn from foreign base company shipping 
operations.

DATES: This correction is effective August 25, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey L. Vinnik, (202) 622-3840 (not 
a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations (TD 9222) that are the subject of this 
correction are under section 951(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the final regulations (TD 9222) contain an error that 
may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

0
Accordingly, the publication of the final regulations (TD 9222), which 
was the subject of FR Doc. 05-16611, is corrected as follows:
0
On page 49864, column 2, in the preamble under the paragraph heading, 
``A. Amounts Determined Under Section 956 of the Code'' second 
paragraph, line 4, the language ``to section 956 under Sec.  1.951-
(1)(e).'' is corrected to read ``to section 956 under Sec.  1.951-
1(e).''.

Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing 
Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 05-22262 Filed 11-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 996/2004

of 18 May 2004         

amending the import duties in the cereals sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 of 28 June 1996 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 as regards import duties in the cereals sector (2), and in particular Article 2(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annexes I and II to Regulation (EC) No 985/2004 are hereby replaced by Annexes I and II to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 May 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 May 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Agriculture Director-General

----

(1)OJ L 181, 1.7.1992, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1104/2003 (OJ L 158, 27.6.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 161, 29.6.1996, p. 125. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1110/2003 (OJ L 158, 27.6.2003, p. 12).

(3)OJ L 180, 15.5.2004, p. 26.

----

ANNEX I

Import duties for the products covered by Article 10(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92

----

(1)  For goods arriving in the Community via the Atlantic Ocean or via the Suez Canal (Article 2(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96), the importer may benefit from a reduction in the duty of:

(2)  The importer may benefit from a flat-rate reduction of EUR 24 per tonne, where the conditions laid down in Article 2(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 are met.

----

ANNEX II

Factors for calculating duties

period from 14 May 2004 to 17 May 2004         

1.   
Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96:

2.   
Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96:
Freight/cost: Gulf of Mexico–Rotterdam: 27,71 EUR/t; Great Lakes–Rotterdam: 44,30 EUR/t.

3.   

----

(*1)  A discount of 10 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*2)  A discount of 30 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*3)  Premium of 14 EUR/t incorporated (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*4)  Fob Duluth.

----
NO. 12-18-00029-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

TONJA AUGMON, INDEPENDENT 

ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE 

OF OBANELYVIA CUNNINGHAM, 

DECEASED, 

APPELLANT

V.

LYDIA NANEZ,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT OF

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Tonja Augmon, Independent Administrator of the Estate of Obanelyvia Cunningham, 

deceased filed an agreed motion to dismiss this appeal. In her motion, Augmon states that the 

parties have reached a settlement agreement. The motion is signed by counsel for each party. 

Because Augmon has met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), we

grant the agreed motion, and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

Opinion delivered October 29, 2018.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

OCTOBER 29, 2018

NO. 12-18-00029-CV

TONJA AUGMON, INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR OF

THE ESTATE OF OBANELYVIA CUNNINGHAM, DECEASED,

Appellant

V.

LYDIA NANEZ,

Appellee

Appeal from the County Court 

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 42,220P)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the agreed motion of the Appellant to 

dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that the 

motion to dismiss be granted.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this 

appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed and that all costs of this appeal be, and the same are, 

adjudged against the party that incurred them; for which execution may issue; and that this decision 

be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
# C_2007114EN.01000301.xml

| 24.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4518 — Alcoa/Orkla/Soft Alloy Extrusion JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 114/05)

On 19 April 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4518. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4518. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---