alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO						18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350						AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO						SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, James Farinella, certify that:			     1.   I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB  of  SoftNet  Technology Corporation;			     2.   Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue  statement of a material  fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements  made, in light of the  circumstances under which such  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;			     3.   Based on my knowledge,  the financial statements,  and other financial information  included in this quarterly report,  fairly present in all material respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods  presented in this quarterly report;			     4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and  procedures  (as defined in Exchange  Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:			          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;			          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and			          c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;			     5.   I  have  disclosed,  based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons  performing  the  equivalent  function):			          a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and			          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and			     6.   I have  indicated in this  quarterly  report whether or not there were significant  changes in  internal  controls or in other  factors  that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including  any  corrective  actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 22, 2006/s/ James Farinella                     			James Farinella			Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

----
<TABLE>
                                     EXHIBIT 11

                                IONICS, INCORPORATED

                          COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                  (Amounts in thousands, except earnings per share)
<CAPTION>
                                            Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended
                                               September 30,          September 30,  
                                              1997       1996        1997       1996 
<S>                                         <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>
Net income                                  $ 7,196    $ 6,853     $21,437    $19,378

Earnings per common and common
  equivalent share:

  Weighted average number of shares          15,957     15,563      15,914     15,467
   outstanding

  Incremental shares for stock options
    under treasury stock method                 436        481         500        575

  Weighted average number of common and  
    common equivalent shares outstanding     16,393     16,044      16,414     16,042

  Earnings per common and common
    equivalent share                        $   .44    $   .43     $  1.31    $  1.21

Earnings per common and common equivalent 
   share - assuming full dilution:

  Weighted average number of shares                                
    outstanding                              15,957     15,563      15,914     15,467

  Incremental shares for stock options                             
    under treasury stock method                 449        554         504        609

  Weighted average number of common and 
    common equivalent shares outstanding -
      assuming full dilution                 16,406     16,117      16,418     16,076

  Earnings per common and common
    equivalent share - assuming             $   .44    $   .43     $  1.31    $  1.21
      full dilution                                                           

</TABLE>

                                          -13-
/14
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated March 20, 2002 with respect to the financial statements of VISaer
(IRL) Limited for the year ended December 31, 2000 included in this Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 into Intelligent Systems
Corporation's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No.
33-99432, No. 333-32157 and No. 333-58134).



/s/ Arthur Andersen


Dublin, Ireland
March 20, 2002
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of K-tel International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Philip Kives, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
|                                      |             |     |
|--------------------------------------|------------------|----------|
|                                 |             |     |
| By                                   | /s/ PHILIP KIVES |     |   |
| Philip Kives                         |             |     |
| *Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,* | * *         | * * |
| *President and Director*             | * *         | * * |
| November 22, 2006                    |             |     |
|                                      |                  |          |  |

 

----
#### STATE v. ANDERSON

No. 99 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 113.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 December 1976. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 7 December 1976.
#### Glenn D. FERREN, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Gale A. NORTON, Secretary of United States Department of the Interior; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 03-35811.

D.C. No. CV-02-00050-H-CCL.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 4, 2005.*

Decided April 7, 2005.

Glenn D. Ferren, Superior, MT, pro se.

Lori Harper Suek, Esq., USGF—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, Susan R. Oxford, Esq., EEOC-OSC/Appellate Services, Joshua Waldman, Esq., *185DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Associate Attorney General, Marleigh Dover, Esq., DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Appellate Staff, Washington, DC, for Defendants—Appellees.

Before KOZINSKI, HAWKINS, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Glenn D. Ferren appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the Department of the Interior (“DOI”) and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal for lack of standing, construing all material allegations in favor of the plaintiff. *Schmier v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit,*279 F.3d 817, 820 (9th Cir.2002). We affirm.

The district court did not err in holding that Ferren failed to establish standing because Ferren is no longer employed by the DOI, and therefore has no personal stake in the declarative and injunctive relief he seeks. *See Scott v. Pasadena Unified School District,*306 F.3d 646, 656 (9th Cir.2002) (“A plaintiff may allege a future injury in order to comply with [the standing] requirement, but only if he or she is immediately in danger of sustaining some direct injury as the result of the challenged official conduct and the injury or threat of injury is both real and immediate, not conjectural or hypothetical.” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)). Ferren cannot cure this deficiency by contending that the personnel directive will discriminate against all present and future employees of the DOI, because he can only plead on behalf of himself, not others. *See Schmier,*279 F.3d at 821-22 (finding no standing where plaintiff did not allege a violation of a right personal to himself, but rather a violation of others’ rights).

Similarly, the district court properly held that Ferren could not bring this suit as a class action because pro se plaintiffs do not have the authority to appear on behalf of others. *See C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States,*818 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir.1987).

Ferren’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                  NAME -- STATE OF INCORPORATION OR FORMATION

<Table>
<Caption>
COMPANY                                                    STATE OF INCORPORATION OR FORMATION
-------                                                    -----------------------------------
<S>                                                        <C>
American Down and Textile, LLC                                       Delaware
Brawn of California, Inc.                                            California
Clearance World Outlets, LLC                                         Delaware
D.M. Advertising, LLC                                                Delaware
Domestications, LLC                                                  Delaware
Gump's By Mail, Inc.                                                 Delaware
Gump's Corp.                                                         California
Hanover Company Store, LLC                                           Delaware
Hanover Gifts, Inc.                                                  Virginia
Hanover Home Fashions Group, LLC                                     Delaware
Hanover Realty, Inc.                                                 Virginia
Keystone Internet Services, LLC                                      Delaware
LaCrosse Fulfillment, LLC                                            Delaware
Scandia Down, LLC                                                    Delaware
Silhouettes, LLC                                                     Delaware
The Company Office, Inc.                                             Delaware
The Company Store Factory, Inc.                                      Delaware
The Company Store Group, LLC                                         Delaware
The Horn & Hardart Company, Inc.                                     New York
</Table>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Irwin Financial Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the Report), I,
Gregory F. Ehlinger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Dated: July 30, 2004
    
    /s/ Gregory F. EhlingerGregory F. EhlingerChief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS CANCHOLA-JUAREZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 19-72717 

Agency No. A206-784-664 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 15, 2022**

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Carlos Canchola-Juarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying a motion to remand 

and dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his 

application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-72717 

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to remand. 

Taggar v. Holder, 736 F.3d 886, 889 (9th Cir. 2013). We dismiss in part and deny 

in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review Canchola-Juarez’s challenges to the BIA’s 

denial of cancellation of removal where the IJ denied relief as a matter of 

discretion. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); see also Lopez-Castellanos v. 

Gonzales, 437 F.3d 848, 854 (9th Cir. 2006) (the court lacks jurisdiction to review 

the agency’s discretionary good moral character determination). Although the 

court retains jurisdiction over questions of law and constitutional claims, 

Canchola-Juarez’s contentions do not amount to colorable claims that would 

invoke our jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D); Lopez-Castellanos, 437 

F.3d at 854.

1 Canchola-Juarez waived his challenge to the agency’s consideration 

of evidence before the ten-year period for good moral character because he raised 

it for the first time in his reply brief. See Nguyen v. Barr, 983 F.3d 1099, 1102 (9th 

Cir. 2020) (petitioner waived a claim first challenged in the reply brief).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Canchola-Juarez’s motion to 

remand for failure to show how the newly submitted evidence would have changed 

the result in the case. See Shin v. Mukasey, 547 F.3d 1019, 1025 (9th Cir. 2008)

1 Canchola-Juarez’s reliance on Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr, ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. 

Ct. 1062 (2020), is misplaced. See Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 650, 656 

(9th Cir. 2007).
3 19-72717 

(applicants “who seek to remand or reopen proceedings to pursue relief bear a 

‘heavy burden’ of proving that, if proceedings were reopened, the new evidence 

would likely change the result in the case” (internal citation omitted)). 

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
Exhibit 32.1


            Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer


The undersigned, the Chairman, President and Treasurer of Jaco Electronics, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended December 31, 2006 (the "Quarterly Report") accompanying
this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods presented as required by such report. The
foregoing certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities
as principal executive officer of the Company, my own due diligence and
representations made by certain other members of the Company's senior
management.

Date:  February 14, 2006

                                      /s/ Joel H. Girsky
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                       Joel H. Girsky
                                      Chairman, President and Treasurer
                                      (Principal Executive Officer)


<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 215 (Tuesday, November 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 67782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22280]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Art Advisory Panel--Notice of closed meeting

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of closed meeting of Art Advisory Panel.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held in 
Washington, DC.

DATES: The meeting will be held November 30, 2005.

ADDRESSES: The closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held on 
November 30, 2005, in Room 4200E beginning at 9:30 a.m., Franklin Court 
Building, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Carolan, C:AP:AS, 1099 14th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. Telephone (202) 435-5609 (not a toll 
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., that a 
closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held on November 30, 
2005, in Room 4200E beginning at 9:30 a.m., Franklin Court Building, 
1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.
    The agenda will consist of the review and evaluation of the 
acceptability of fair market value appraisals of works of art involved 
in Federal income, estate, or gift tax returns. This will involve the 
discussion of material in individual tax returns made confidential by 
the provisions of 26 U.S.C. 6103.
    A determination as required by section 10(d) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act has been made that this meeting is concerned 
with matters listed in section 552b(c)(3), (4), (6), and (7), and that 
the meeting will not be open to the public.

David B. Robison,
Chief, Appeals.
[FR Doc. 05-22280 Filed 11-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
AM I A PROTECTED VETERAN?

The Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974 (VEVRAA), as amended 

(38 U.S.C. § 4212), prohibits discrimination against protected veterans. 

Under VEVRAA, a veteran may be classified as a ‘‘disabled veteran,’’ ‘‘recently separated veteran,’’ 

‘‘active duty wartime or campaign badge veteran,’’ or ‘‘Armed Forces service medal veteran.’’

DETERMINE YOUR VETERAN STATUS

1 Did you serve on 

active duty* in the 

U.S. Military? 

*See 38 USC § 101(21) for a 

full list of service that may 

be counted as active duty.

2 Were you discharged 

or released from 

service under 

conditions other 

than dishonorable?

If you answered “yes” to the above questions, continue to the questions below. 

If you answered “no” to any of the questions, you may not be considered a protected veteran.

DETERMINE IF YOU ARE 

PROTECTED UNDER VEVRAA

DISABLED 

VETERAN

• Are you a 

veteran of the 

U.S. Military who 

is entitled to 

compensation (or 

who but for the 

receipt of military 

retired pay would 

be entitled to 

compensation) 

under laws 

administered by 

the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs?

 or 

• Were you 

discharged 

or released 

from active 

duty because 

of a serviceconnected 

disability?

RECENTLY

SEPARATED

VETERAN

• Were you 

discharged or 

released from 

active duty 

within the last 

three years?

ACTIVE DUTY

WARTIME OR

CAMPAIGN 

BADGE VETERAN

• Did you serve 

on active duty 

during one or 

more of the 

periods of war 

outlined in 38 

U.S.C. § 101?†

• Did you serve 

on active duty 

in any campaign 

or expedition for 

which a campaign 

badge has been 

authorized 

under the laws 

administered by 

the Department 

of Defense?

ARMED 

FORCES

SERVICE 

MEDAL

VETERAN

• Did you serve 

on active duty 

in a U.S. military 

operation 

for which an 

Armed Forces 

Service Medal 

was awarded 

pursuant to 

Executive Order 

12985 (61 FR 

1209) and were 

you awarded the 

Armed Forces 

Service Medal?

• If you were 

awarded the 

Armed Forces 

Service Medal, is 

it listed on your 

DD Form 214?

If you answer “yes” to any questions in the above categories, you may 

be protected under VEVRAA. A veteran may qualify in more than one category. 

If you do not fall into any of the categories, you may not be a protected veteran.

Please note that this page provides general information. It is not intended to substitute for 

the actual law and regulations regarding the program described herein.

†Period of War Dates: Korean Conflict June 27, 1950 – January 31, 1955; Vietnam Era February 28, 1961 – May 7, 1975 for veterans 

serving in the Republic of Vietnam or August 5, 1964 – May 7, 1975 for all other cases; Persian Gulf War August 2, 1990 – current.

If you do not have a DD-214 Form, or have additional questions about your veteran status, please contact 

the Department of Veterans Affairs at 1-800-827-1000.

OFFICE OF FEDERAL CONTRACT

COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS

U.S. Department of Labor

200 CONSTITUTION AVENUE NW | WASHINGTON, DC 20210 | tel: 1-800-397-6251 | TTY: 1-877-889-5627 | www.dol.gov/ofccp Revised September 2016