1

Filed 7/30/13 In re Kris P. CA1/3 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS 

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT 

DIVISION THREE 

In re KRIS P., a Person Coming Under the 

Juvenile Court Law. 

THE PEOPLE, 

 Plaintiff and Respondent, 

v. 

KRIS P., 

 Defendant and Appellant. 

 A138042 

 (Contra Costa County 

 Super. Ct. No. J11-01427) 

 The 17-year-old minor appeals from a dispositional order increasing his period of 

commitment following his admission of a probation violation. His attorney has asked this 

court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable 

issues for review. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, 744; People v. Kelly (2006) 

40 Cal.4th 106, 119; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441-442.) The minor was 

informed of his right to file a supplemental brief, which he has not done. Upon 

independent review of the record, we conclude no arguable issues are presented for 

review and affirm the judgment. 

Discussion 

 In December 2011, the minor was declared a ward of the court following his 

admission to grand theft of a computer laptop. (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (c).) The court 

committed the minor to the Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Facility (Facility) for a 

period not to exceed nine months followed by an additional 90-day conditional release 
2

parole period. The minor was required as a condition of probation to obey all laws and 

Facility rules. We affirmed the jurisdictional and dispositional orders. (In re K.P. (July 

20, 2012, A134131) [nonpub. opn.].) 

 In May 2012, the minor admitted violating probation by engaging in a physical 

altercation with a Facility resident. An additional 15 days were added to the original 

Facility commitment for grand theft. 

 In October 2012, while on parole, the minor was found carrying a concealed 

firearm. (Pen. Code, § 25400, subd. (a)(2).) The minor was continued as a ward of the 

court and committed to the Facility for a second nine-month period. 

 In February 2013, the minor admitted violating probation by “obstruct[ing] the 

view of institutional staff before the commencement of a physical altercation involving 

two other residents.” The court found the altercation to be a gang fight and that the minor 

“helped to set it up.” The court noted that the minor was observed “giving a thumbs-up 

sign behind [his] back so that the fight could begin.” The court added 45 days to the 

minor’s commitment. 

 The minor filed a timely notice of appeal. 

 The minor was represented by retained counsel in the probation violation 

proceedings. No error appears in the acceptance of his admission of the probation 

violation and we find no abuse of discretion with regard to the court’s imposition of 

additional commitment time. 
3

Disposition 

 The dispositional order is affirmed. 

 _________________________ 

 Pollak, Acting P.J. 

We concur: 

_________________________ 

Siggins, J. 

_________________________ 

Jenkins, J.