alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Strategic Internet Investments,
  Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September
  30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the "Report"). I, Ralph Shearing, Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify,
  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.

|Date: | November 19, 2004 |  | /s/ Ralph Shearing      
|----- | ----------------- |  | ------------------------
|      |                   |  | Ralph Shearing, Director

---
##### 



Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Intelligent Systems Corporation
Norcross, GA

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (Form S-8 No. 333-58134, No. 333-32157 and No. 33-99432) of our
report dated March 28, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Intelligent Systems Corporation and Subsidiaries appearing in
the companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP



BDO Seidman, LLP





Atlanta, Georgia
March 28, 2003
#### STATE v. HENRY BERRY CASON.

(Filed 11 May, 1966.)

Indictment and Warrant § 1—

The waiver of preliminary hearing by a defendant without benefit of counsel cannot amount to a *deprivation of*defendant’s constitutional rights when no plea is entered upon such preliminary hearing.

Moobe, J., not sitting.

Appeal by defendant from *McLaughlin, J.,*October 18, 1965 Criminal Session of Guilfobd (Greensboro Division).

The defendant was tried upon a bill of indictment charging that he did unlawfully, wilfully and feloniously commit the abominable and detestable crime against nature with one ., a female of the age of ten years.

The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged in the bill of indictment.

From the judgment imposed the defendant appeals, assigning error.

*Attorney General Bruton and Staff Attorney Vanore for the State.*

*Wallace C. Harrelson for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The State's evidence was ample to carry the case to the jury and to support the verdict returned by the jury.

The defendant waived preliminary hearing on 16 August 1965 in the Municipal County Court of Guilford County. He now contends that his constitutional right was violated when he was permitted to waive the preliminary hearing without the benefit of counsel. The defendant was furnished with court-appointed counsel to represent him at his trial in the Superior Court.

Since the hearing was waived and no plea was entered, in our opinion the case of *White v. Maryland,*373 U.S. 59, 10 L. Ed. 2d 193, and similar cases relied on by the defendant are not applicable to the factual situation in this case. In *White v. Maryland, supra,*a preliminary hearing was held and the defendant entered a plea of guilty, and such plea was admitted in evidence at the trial of the case.

In our opinion the defendant’s assignments of error present no prejudicial error that would justify disturbing the result of the trial below. We find

No error.

Moore, J., not sitting.
# L_2007188EN.01001401.xml

| 20.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 188/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 188/14

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 855/2007

of 19 July 2007

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 38/2007

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 of 17 January 2007 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale for export of sugar held by the intervention agencies of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 of 17 January 2007 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale for export of sugar held by the intervention agencies of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 18 July 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 18 July 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 18 July 2007, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 shall be 45,236 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 July 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 July 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 247/2007 (OJ L 69, 9.3.2007, p. 3).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 11, 18.1.2007, p. 4. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 203/2007 (OJ L 61, 28.2.2006, p. 3).

2

---
#### LAS VEGAS SUN, INC., a Nevada Corporation, Appellant, v. DOUGLAS T. NELSON, Guardian ad Litem for TERRY NELSON, LLOYD H. LEANY, Guardian ad Litem for LLOYD S. LEANY, Respondents.

No. 10990

November 19, 1980

619 P.2d 534

*826*Beckley, Singleton, DeLanoy & Jemison,*Las Vegas, for Appellant.

*Steffen & Simmons,*Las Vegas, for Respondent Nelson.

*George D. Frame,*Las Vegas, for Respondent Leany.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Appellant has filed its opening, brief in this matter. Respondents have been granted two extensions of time, within which to file their answering brief, the last extension having expired on December 17, 1979. To this date respondents have failed to file an answering brief.

Pursuant to NRAP 31(c) we elect to treat respondents’ failure to file their answering brief as a confession of error. *See also,*State of Rhode Island v. Prins, 96 Nev. 565, 613 P.2d 408 (1980); Kitchen Factors, Inc. v. Brown, 91 Nev. 308, 535 P.2d 677 (1975); Toiyabe Supply Co. v. Arcade, 74 Nev. 314, 330 P.2d 121 (1958). Accordingly, we vacate oral argument, NRAP 31(c), and reverse the judgment without consideration of the merits.

Reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,160
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,314
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,018
<PP&E>                                         105,868
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,550
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           173
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,171
<SALES>                                         75,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,862
<CGS>                                           57,936
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,936
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,245
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,504
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,676
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,828
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,828
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00449-CR

Dustin Cole Clearman

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 78th District Court

of Wichita County (57,414-B)

May 24, 2018

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ISOMET CORP
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,542
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,624
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,149
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,742
<PP&E>                                           2,496
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,097
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,361
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,928
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,148
<SALES>                                          2,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,654
<CGS>                                            1,798
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,163
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    491
<INCOME-TAX>                                       185
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                306
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       306
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 217 (Thursday, November 10, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68477-68478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22389]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 05-151]


NASA Advisory Council; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council.

[[Page 68478]]


DATES: Tuesday, November 29, 2005, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.; and Wednesday, 
November 30, 2005, 8 a.m. to 2 p.m.

ADDRESSES: On Tuesday, November 29, 2005, the meeting will be held at 
the Rayburn House Office Building (RHOB), Room 2318.
    The RHOB is located southwest of the Capitol on a site bounded by 
Independence Avenue, South Capitol Street, First Street, and C Street, 
SW., (Use the Independence Avenue entrance.) On Wednesday, November 30, 
2005, the meeting will be held at the Senate Dirksen Office Building 
(SDOB), Room 562. The SDOB is located northeast of the Capitol, 
adjoining the Hart Senate Office Building on a site bounded by 
Constitution Avenue, Second Street, First Street, and C Street, NE., 
(Use the Constitution Avenue entrance.)

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Christopher Blackerby, Designated 
Federal Official, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 
Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-4688.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting includes 
the following topics:
    <bullet> Welcoming remarks.
    <bullet> Council organizational structure and membership.
    <bullet> Exploration Systems Architecture Study Overview.
    <bullet> Shuttle/Station Operations Overview.
    <bullet> Science Overview.
    <bullet> Aeronautics Research Overview.
    <bullet> Workforce Overview (including Minority Business, 
Education).
    <bullet> Audit and Finance Overview.
    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

    Dated: November 3, 2005.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 05-22389 Filed 11-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
67150 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 05–22027 Filed 11–3–05; 8:45am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal No. 06–04] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604–

6575. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittal 06–04 with 

attached transmittal, policy justification, 

and Sensitivity of Technology. 

Dated: October 31, 2005. 

L.M. Bynum, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


EN04NO05.007</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Notices 67151 


EN04NO05.008</GPH>
67152 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Notices 


EN04NO05.009</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Notices 67153 


EN04NO05.010</GPH>
67154 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 05–22028 Filed 11–3–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Notice of Proposed Information 

Collection Requests 

AGENCY: Department of Education. 

SUMMARY: The Leader, Information 

Management Case Services Team, 

Regulatory Information Management 

Services, Office of the Chief Information 

Officer, invites comments on the 

proposed information collection 

requests as required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Interested persons are invited to 

submit comments on or before January 

3, 2006. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires 

that the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) provide interested 

Federal agencies and the public an early 


EN04NO05.011</GPH>
Order entered November 21, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01235-CR

No. 05-13-01237-CR

JOHN CLOUD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F93-61603-N, F93-61604-N

ORDER

The Court DENIES appellant’s November 13, 2013 “supplement” to the motion to 

reconsider our October 16, 2013 order and appellant’s November 19, 2013 objection to our 

November 8, 2013 order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first-class mail, to John Cloud, 

TDCJ No. 749521, Powledge Unit, 1400 F.M. 3452, Palestine, Texas 75803.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER<F1>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-10-1999
<CASH>                                         5,380
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  110,354
<ALLOWANCES>                                   5,318
<INVENTORY>                                    18,429
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               149,422
<PP&E>                                         204,911
<DEPRECIATION>                                 282,697
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 608,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          147,097
<BONDS>                                        5,494
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,600
<OTHER-SE>                                     450,810
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        573,766
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               573,766
<CGS>                                          300,601
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  488,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                89,371
<INCOME-TAX>                                   36,617
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            52,754
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   52,754
<EPS-BASIC>                                  1.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.92
<FN>
<F1>  10 ACCOUNTING PERIODS
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN FORM 10-Q FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,689
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,911
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,400
<INVENTORY>                                      4,026
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,319
<PP&E>                                         120,189
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,073
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 157,338
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,621
<BONDS>                                         70,519
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,017
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   157,338
<SALES>                                         89,676
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               112,801
<CGS>                                           80,810
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  103,613
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,294
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   799
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,950
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,894
<INCOME-TAX>                                       738
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,156
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,156
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17


</TABLE>