alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNDERWOOD v. HOWLAND, COMR. OF MOTOR VEHICLES

No. 357

Case below: 1 N.C. App. 560.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 23 August 1968. Case set with appeals from the 8th, 24th and 25th Districts.
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)

I, Philip Kives, certify that:

1.     I have reviewedthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 ofK-tel International, Inc.;

2.     Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.     Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.     Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.     All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b.     Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 18, 2006
|   | /s/ Philip Kives                       |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Philip Kives                           |
|   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5595 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5595

   To amend section 214(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to 
     create, for an alien seeking to enter the United States as a 
nonimmigrant to care for a relative with a serious health condition, an 
     exemption from the presumption that the alien is an immigrant.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2010

 Mr. Ellison introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend section 214(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to 
     create, for an alien seeking to enter the United States as a 
nonimmigrant to care for a relative with a serious health condition, an 
     exemption from the presumption that the alien is an immigrant.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM PRESUMPTION THAT AN ALIEN IS AN IMMIGRANT.

    Section 214(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1184(b)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(b) Every alien (other than'' and 
        inserting the following:
    ``(b)(1) Every alien (except for a nonimmigrant described in 
paragraph (2),'';
            (2) by striking ``and other than'' and inserting ``and''; 
        and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) An alien is described in this paragraph if the alien--
            ``(A) is a family member of an individual who--
                    ``(i) is suffering from a serious health condition 
                (as such term is defined in section 101(11) of the 
                Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (29 U.S.C. 
                2611(11)); and
                    ``(ii) is a citizen of the United States or an 
                alien lawfully admitted to the United States for 
                permanent residence;
            ``(B) seeks to enter the United States to provide care to 
        the individual described in subparagraph (A); and
            ``(C) submits an attestation from a health care provider 
        (as such term is defined in section 101(6) of the Family and 
        Medical Leave Act of 1993 (29 U.S.C. 2611(6)) of the individual 
        described in subparagraph (A) that includes--
                    ``(i) a diagnosis statement, which includes the 
                treatment being provided; and
                    ``(ii) the expected time period during which such 
                care will be required.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            (In 000's, except per share
                                                                     amounts)       

                                                               TWELVE MONTHS ENDED   
                                                             DEC. 28,         DEC. 30,
                                                               1996             1995
                                                            ---------------------------
<S>                                                         <C>              <C>      
Income (loss) before extraordinary item                     $(103,895)       $(28,153)
Extraordinary item                                             (1,134)         (1,837)
                                                            ---------        --------
Net income (loss)                                            (105,029)        (29,990)
Preferred stock dividends                                        (225)           (240)
Net income (loss) applicable to Common Shareholders         $(105,254)       $(30,230)
Average shares of common stock outstanding during
   the period                                                 111,441          93,030
Incremental shares from assumed exercise of stock
   options (primary)                                              950             111

Total shares used to calculate PEPS*                          111,441          93,030

Primary earnings per share before extraordinary item        $   (0.93)       $  (0.30)
Extraordinary item                                              (0.01)          (0.02)
                                                            ---------        --------
Primary earnings per share                                  $   (0.94)       $  (0.32)

Average shares of common stock outstanding during
   the period                                                 111,441          93,030
Incremental shares from assumed exercise of stock
   options (fully diluted)                                        950             111

Total shares used to calculate FDEPS*                         111,441          93,030

Fully diluted earnings per share before extraordinary
   item                                                     $   (0.93)       $  (0.30)
Extraordinary item                                              (0.01)          (0.02)
                                                            ---------        --------
Fully diluted earnings per share                            $   (0.94)       $  (0.32)

Average shares of common stock outstanding during
   the period                                                 111,441          93,030
Basic earnings per share                                    $   (0.94)       $  (0.32)
</TABLE>

*  Per APB 15, when a net loss is reported, exercise or conversion is not to be
   assumed.
EX-10.18


   

  Exhibit 10.18

   

  ZEVIA LLC

  2011 UNIT INCENTIVE PLAN
 

  THIRD AMENDMENT TO UNIT OPTION AGREEMENT

  This Third Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Unit Option Agreement by and between 			 (the “Participant”) and Zevia LLC dated 				, as amended by the Global Amendment to Unit Option Agreements effective June 2, 2021 and the Second Amendment to Unit Option Agreement effective 			, 2021 and as assumed by Zevia PBC (the “Company”) and adjusted to reflect stock options of the Company on July 21, 2021 (collectively, the “Option Agreement”), is hereby entered into between the Participant and the Company effective as of November 19, 2021 (the “Amendment Effective Date”). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Option Agreement or the Zevia LLC 2011 Unit Incentive Plan (as amended from time to time), as applicable.

  	WHEREAS, the Company and the Participant desire to amend the Option Agreement on the terms set forth herein.

  	NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, effective as of the Amendment Effective Date, the Option Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

  1.Part I of the Option Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the end of the section entitled “Termination Period”: 


   

  “Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Participant ceases to be a Service Provider as a result of a termination due to Participant’s Retirement on or after January 17, 2022, this Option shall be exercisable until the earlier of (i) the Term/Expiration Date provided above or (ii) the fifth anniversary of the date Participant ceases to be a Service Provider. 

  2.Except as expressly amended hereby, the Option Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. 


   

  3.This Amendment is governed by the internal substantive laws, but not the choice of law rules, of Delaware.


   

  4.	This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement, it being understood that all parties need not sign the same counterpart. 

   

   

   

  

   

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Amendment, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized representatives.

   

  		
	[                                  ]
	ZEVIA PBC

	 
_________________________________
	By:  ________________________

	 
	Name:

	 
	Title:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 209 (Monday, October 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 62368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21600]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Public Federal Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Hearing Region VI 
Regulatory Fairness Board

    The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) Region VI Regulatory 
Fairness Board and the SBA Office of the National Ombudsman will hold a 
public hearing on Thursday, November 10, 2005, at 9 a.m. The meeting 
will take place at the State Capitol, Old Supreme Court Room, Fifth and 
Woodlane, Little Rock, AR to receive comments and testimony from small 
business owners, small government entities, and small non-profit 
organizations concerning regulatory enforcement and compliance actions 
taken by Federal agencies.
    Anyone wishing to attend or to make a presentation must contact 
Carol Silverstrom, in writing or by fax, in order to be put on the 
agenda. Carol Silverstrom, Public Information Officer, SBA, Arkansas 
District Office, 2120 Riverfront Drive Suite 250, Little Rock, AR 
72202-1796, phone (501) 324-7379 Ext. 227, fax (501) 324-7395, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c487a5b6aba8eab7ada8b2a1b6b7b0b6aba984b7a6a5eaa3abb2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="efac8e9d8083c19c8683998a9d9c9b9d8082af9c8d8ec1888099">[email protected]</span></a>.
    For more information, see our Web site at http://www.sba.gov/ombudsman.

Matthew K. Becker,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-21600 Filed 10-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          20,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,710
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,708
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,638
<PP&E>                                         575,280
<DEPRECIATION>                                 190,919
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 452,846
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,285
<BONDS>                                        249,354
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              305
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,516
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,061
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   452,846
<SALES>                                        147,203
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,203
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  175,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   577
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,054
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (56,818)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (15,976)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (40,842)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (420)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (41,262)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.25)


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2






Section 1350 Certification
of Principal Financial Officer







The
undersigned, the Executive Vice President, Finance and Secretary of Jaco
Electronics, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 (the “Quarterly
Report”) accompanying this certification fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the dates and for the periods presented as required by such
report. The foregoing certification is based upon, among other things, my
responsibilities as principal financial officer of the Company, my own due
diligence and representations made by certain other members of the Company’s
senior management.







Date: May
20, 2009





/s/ Jeffrey D.
Gash


Jeffrey
D. Gash


Executive
Vice President, Finance and Secretary


(Principal
Financial Officer)
Order entered November 21 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 01235
- CR No. 05
- 13
- 01237
- CR JOHN CLOUD, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, T exas Trial Court Cause No s. F93
- 61603
- N , F93
- 61604
- N



### O RDER
The Court DENIE S appellant’s November 13, 2013 “supplement” to the motion to reconsider our October 16, 2013 order and appellant’s November 19, 2013 objection to our November 8, 2013 order.
We DI RECT the Clerk to send a cop y of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first

- class mail, to John Cloud, TDCJ No. 749521, Powledge Unit, 1400 F.M. 3452, Palestine, Texas 75803.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
#### Gregory WILLIAMS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Gail LEWIS, Warden; et al., Respondents—Appellees.

No. 03-56120.

D.C. No. CV-02-00589-SVW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*180Submitted March 9, 2005.*

Decided April 5, 2005.

Gregory Williams, Coalinga, CA, pro se.

William S. Harris, Esq., Stewart *&*Harris, South Pasadena, CA, Jeffrey J. Koch, Esq., Office of the California Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for RespondentsAppellees.

Before HALL, PAEZ, Circuit Judges, and BEISTLINE, District Judge.**

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

The Honorable Ralph R. Beistline, United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Petitioner Gregory Williams seeks habeas relief based upon his allegation that the state court of appeal arbitrarily interpreted a state statute, thereby denying him a state-created right to have a jury determine whether he suffered a prior conviction for purposes of his sentencing under California’s three strikes law. Because the state court did not arbitrarily deny Williams’ state-created right, we affirm the district court’s denial of his petition.

The state court did not deprive Williams of his federal due process rights. At the time of his conviction and direct appeal, the California Supreme Court had not yet interpreted California Penal Code section 1025. Even after the California Supreme Court addressed the issue, the scope of the right remained unclear. *People v. Epps,*25 Cal.4th 19, 104 Cal.Rptr.2d 572, 18 P.3d 2, 6 (Cal.2001) (noting that the right to a jury determination of whether a prior conviction occurred exists only “in an appropriate case,” and that “depending on the circumstances, the question might well be for the court” rather than the jury). Therefore, petitioner did not have a “substantial and legitimate expectation” that he would receive a jury trial such that his federal due process rights would be implicated. *Hicks v. Oklahoma,*447 U.S. 343, 346-47, 100 S.Ct. 2227, 65 L.Ed.2d 175 (1980) (granting habeas relief because the state court violated petitioner’s “substantial and legitimate expectation” to a jury sentence and made a “wholly incorrect” finding that the error was harmless). Because the California Court of Appeal’s interpretation of section 1025 was not arbitrary, its decision that Williams was not entitled to a jury determination of whether he suffered a prior conviction was not “contrary to” or “an unreasonable application of’ *Hicks.*28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1).

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

              We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following (i)
Registration Statement No. 2-82186 on Form S-8 filed March 3, 1983; (ii)
Registration Statement No. 33-37187 on Form S-3 filed February 27, 1991; (iii)
Registration Statement No. 33-48363 on Form S-8 filed June 3, 1992; (iv)
Registration Statement No. 33-79146 on Form S-8 filed May 19, 1994; (v)
Registration Statement No. 333-06021 on Form S-8 filed June 14, 1996; (vi)
Registration Statement No. 333-48697 on Form S-8 filed March 26, 1998; and (vii)
Registration Statement No. 333-57585 on Form S-8 filed June 24, 1998, and in the
related Prospectuses, of our report dated August 17, 1998 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of WMS Industries Inc. and
subsidiaries, included and/or incorporated by reference, in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) of WMS Industries Inc. for the year ended June 30, 1998.


                                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
September 22, 1998
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Grey Wolf, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report), as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Thomas P. Richards,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and David W.
Wehlmann, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Thomas P. RichardsThomas P. RichardsChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer /s/ David W. WehlmannDavid W. WehlmannExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Date: August 9, 2004
#### STATE v. COLLINS

No. 113 PC.

Case below: 45 N.C. App. 555.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 May 1980.