Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 214 / Monday, November 7, 2005 / Notices 67433 

to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping at the levels listed in the 

‘‘Final Results of Reviews’’ section 

below. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 7, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zev 

Primor or Edythe Artman, AD/CVD 

Enforcement 5, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street & Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4114 or (202) 482–3931. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background: 

On July 1, 2005, the Department 

initiated the second sunset reviews of 

the antidumping duty orders on light–

walled welded rectangular carbon steel 

tubing from Argentina and Taiwan 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. 

See Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Reviews, 70 FR 38101 (July 1, 2005). 

The Department received a notice of 

intent to participate from Allied Tube 

and Conduit, Hannibal Industries, 

Leavitt Tube Company, Northwest Pipe 

Company, Searing Industries, and 

Western Tube and Conduit (collectively 

the domestic interested parties) within 

the deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i) pertaining to sunset 

reviews. The domestic interested parties 

claimed interested–party status under 

section 771(9)(C) of the Act as 

manufacturers of a domestic like 

product in the United States. We 

received complete substantive responses 

from the domestic interested parties 

within the 30-day deadline specified in 

19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). We received no 

responses from the respondent 

interested parties. As a result, pursuant 

to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the 

Department has conducted expedited 

(120-day) sunset reviews of these orders. 

Scope of the Orders: 

The product covered by these orders 

is light–walled welded carbon steel 

pipes and tubes of rectangular 

(including square) cross-section having 

a wall thickness of less than 0.156 inch. 

This merchandise is classified under 

item number 7306.60.50.00 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States. It was formerly classified 

under item number 610.4928 of the 

Tariff Schedules of the United States. 

Analysis of Comments Received: 

All issues raised in these reviews are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum from Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, to Joseph A. Spetrini, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, dated October 31, 2005, 

which is hereby adopted by this notice. 

The issues discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum include the 

likelihood of continuation or recurrence 

of dumping and the magnitude of the 

margins likely to prevail if the orders 

were to be revoked. Parties can find a 

complete discussion of all issues raised 

in these reviews and the corresponding 

recommendations in this public 

memorandum which is on file in room 

B–099 of the main Commerce building. 

In addition, a complete version of the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly on the Web at 

http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy 

and electronic version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Final Results of Reviews: 

We determine that revocation of the 

antidumping duty orders on light–

walled welded rectangular carbon steel 

tubing from Argentina and Taiwan 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of dumping at the 

following weighted–average percentage 

margins: 

Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers 

Weighted–

Average 

Margin 

(percent) 

Argentina.

All Manufacturers/Producers/Exporters ..................................... 56.26 

Taiwan.

Ornatube Enterprise ................... 5.51 

Vulcan Industrial Corp. ............... 40.97 

Yieh Hsing Industries, Ltd. ......... 40.97 

All Other Manufacturers/Producers/Exporters ..................... 29.15 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective orders (APO) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective orders 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: October 31, 2005. 

Joseph A. Spetrini, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 05–22152 Filed 11–4–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Paper Clips from the People’s Republic 

of China; Notice of Final Results of 

Expedited Sunset Review of 

Antidumping Duty Order 

A–570–826 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 1, 2005, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) initiated the sunset 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on paper clips from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘China’’). See 

Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Reviews, 70 FR 38101 (July 1, 2005). On 

the basis of Notices of Intent to 

Participate, adequate substantive 

responses filed on behalf of domestic 

interested parties, and a lack of response 

from respondent interested parties, the 

Department conducted an expedited 

(120-day) sunset review. As a result of 

this sunset review, the Department finds 

that revocation of the antidumping duty 

order would likely lead to the 

continuation or recurrence of dumping. 

The dumping margins are identified in 

the Final Results of Review section of 

this notice. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 7, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Hilary Sadler, Esq. or Maureen 

Flannery, AD/CVD Operations, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street & Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4340 or (202) 482–3020, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 1, 2005, the Department 

published the notice of initiation of the 

sunset review of the antidumping duty 

order on paper clips from China 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). 

See Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Reviews, 70 FR 38101 (July 1, 2005). On 

July 11, 2005 and July 16, 2005, the 

Department received a Notice of Intent 

to Participate from Officemate 

International Corporation and ACCO 

Brands, Inc., the domestic interested 

67434 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 214 / Monday, November 7, 2005 / Notices 

parties, within the deadline specified in 

section 351.218(d)(1)(i) of the 

Department’s regulations. The domestic 

interested parties claimed interested 

parties status under section 771(9)(C) of 

the Act, as manufacturers, producers, or 

wholesalers in the United States of a 

domestic like product. On July 29, 2005, 

and August 1, 2005, the Department 

received complete substantive responses 

from the domestic interested parties 

within the deadline specified in section 

351.218(d)(3)(i) of the Department’s 

regulations. The Department did not 

receive a response from any respondent 

interested parties to this proceeding. As 

a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) 

of the Act and section 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) of the 

Department’s regulations, the 

Department conducted an expedited 

review of this order. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this order 

are certain paper clips, wholly of wire 

of base metal, whether or not 

galvanized, whether or not plated with 

nickel or other base metal (e.g., copper), 

with a wire diameter between 0.025 

inches and 0.075 inches (0.64 to 1.91 

millimeters), regardless of physical 

configuration, except as specifically 

excluded. The products subject to this 

order may have a rectangular or ring–

like shape and include, but are not 

limited to, clips commercially referred 

to as No. 1 clips, No. 3 clips, Jumbo or 

Giant clips, Gem clips, Frictioned clips, 

Perfect Gems, Marcel Gems, Universal 

clips, Nifty clips, Peerless clips, Ring 

clips, and Glide–On clips. The products 

subject to this order are currently 

classifiable under subheading 

8305.90.3010 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States 

(‘‘HTSUS’’). 

Specifically excluded from the scope 

of this order are plastic and vinyl 

covered paper clips, butterfly clips, 

binder clips, or other paper fasteners 

that are not made wholly of wire of base 

metal and are covered under a separate 

subheading of the HTSUS. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

scope of this order is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this review are 

addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum’’ (‘‘Decision Memo’’) 

from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD 

Operations, to Joseph A. Spetrini, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, dated October 31, 2005, 

which is hereby adopted by this notice. 

The issues discussed in the Decision 

Memo include the likelihood of 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and the magnitude of the margins likely 

to prevail if the order were revoked. 

Parties can find a complete discussion 

of all issues raised in this review and 

the corresponding recommendations in 

this public memorandum which is on 

file in room B–099 of the main 

Commerce building. 

In addition, a complete version of the 

Decision Memo can be accessed directly 

on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/. 

The paper copy and electronic version 

of the Decision Memo are identical in 

content. 

Final Results of Review 

We determine that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on paper clips 

from China would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

at the following weighted–average 

percentage margins: 

Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers Weighted Average 

Margin (percent) 

Shanghai Lansheng 

Corporation ............... 57.64 

Zhejiang Light Industrial 

Products Import & Export Corporation ........ 46.01 

Zhejiang Machinery and 

Equipment Import & 

Export Corporation .... 60.70 

China–wide Rate .......... 126.94 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with section 351.305 of the 

Department’s regulations. Timely 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation which is subject to sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: October 31, 2005. 

Joseph A. Spetrini, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 05–22144 Filed 11–4–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–570–879 

Polyvinyl Alcohol from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) is conducting the 

first administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on polyvinyl 

alcohol (‘‘PVA’’) from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) covering the 

period August 11, 2003, through 

September 30, 2004. We have 

preliminarily determined that sales have 

been made below normal value. If these 

preliminary results are adopted in our 

final results of this review, we will 

instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to assess 

antidumping duties on entries of subject 

merchandise during the period of 

review (‘‘POR’’) for which the importer–

specific assessment rates are above de 

minimis. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

We will issue the final results no later 

than 120 days from the date of 

publication of this notice. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 7, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit 

Astvatsatrian, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 8, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–6412. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 1, 2003, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

antidumping duty order on PVA from 

the PRC. See Antidumping Duty Order: 

Polyvinyl Alcohol from the People’s 

Republic of China, 68 FR 56620 

(October 1, 2003). On October 1, 2004, 

the Department published a notice of 

opportunity to request an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on PVA from the PRC for the period 

March 20, 2003, through September 30, 

2004. See Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 

Suspended Investigation: Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 69 

FR 58889 (October 1, 2004). On October