alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Grey Wolf, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Nos.
33-34590, 33-75338, 333-19027, 333-65049, and 333-41334 of Grey Wolf, Inc. on
Form S-8 and Registration Statements Nos. 333-14783, 333-06077, 333- 26519,
333-20423, 333-36593, 333-39683, 333-86949, and 333-40874 of Grey Wolf, Inc. on
Form S-3, of our report dated January 25, 2002, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Grey Wolf, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and
2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'
equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2001 and the related financial statement
schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form
10-K of Grey Wolf, Inc.






Houston, Texas
March 15, 2002
#### STATE v. WISE

No. 93 PC.

Case below: 18 N.C. App. 151.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 12 July 1973.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 213 (Friday, November 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 67182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21996]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, Stem Cells: Promise and Peril in 
Regenerative Medicine.
    Date: November 10, 2005.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Jon M. Ranhand, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6884, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d4f5c53555c5359577d505c545113535455135a524b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d0f1c13151c1319173d101c141153131415531a120b">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 28, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-21996 Filed 11-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE v. SMEDBERG

No. 19 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 585.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 31 January 1977. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 31 January 1977.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1046

JOHN SZYKA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FARM BUREAU, Hendersonville, North Carolina; KIM BANKS, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-98-88-1-T) Submitted: February 26, 1999 Decided: April 1, 1999 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Szyka, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Dale McInnes, CLONINGER, BARBOUR & ARCURI, P.A., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Szyka appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Appellees, Farm Bureau and Kim Banks, have filed a motion to dismiss this appealasserting that Appellant’s, John Szyka, notice of appeal was untimely filed. Although the district court’s judgment was marked as “filed” on October 27, 1998, it was not entered on the district court’s docket sheet until November 2, 1998. See Wilson v. Murray , 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986) (pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the date of the judgment that was entered on the docket sheet is the date we take as the effective date of the district court's decision). Thus, Szyka timely filed his notice of appeal on November 27, 1998. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). Accordingly, we deny Appellees’ motion to dismiss this appeal. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Szyka v. Farm Bureau , No. CA-98-88-1-T (W.D.N.C. Nov. 2, 1998). We also deny Szyka’s motion to remand this case to the district court and deny Szyka’s motion for a tenday extension to file an additional supplemental brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions3 are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Strategic Internet
Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"). I, Ralph Shearing, Chief Executive Officer of the
company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: | October 31, 2006 |  | /s/ Ralph Shearing           
|----- | ---------------- |  | -----------------------------
|      |                  |  | Ralph Shearing, CEO, Director

---
Exhibit 2.3
  
 Re: Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement dated July 21, 2008
  Seller Purchaser Purchase Agreement Agreement
 Uncertified
Files Pay Proceeds Files
 Uncertified Files
 Uncertified Portion
of Purchase Price




---



##### 



Certified File plus
  Pay Proceeds Files
 provided however Unpaid Portion of Purchase Price
 plus
 2




---



##### 



Certain Liabilities of Seller
 Additional Assumed Liabilities
 Insurance Indemnification
 Uninsured Property
 Closing Date
  Amendment
  [Signature page follows]
 3




---



##### 



Sincerely,PURCHASER:EQ Acquisitions 2003, Inc.By:
    
    /s/ Gary SilverhardtName:
    
    Gary SilverhardtTitle:
    
    President & CEOPURCHASER GUARANTOR:Equilease Financial Services, IncBy:
    
    /s/ Gary SilverhardtName:
    
    Gary SilverhardtTitle:
    
    President & CEO
 30th
 SELLER:
  By:
    
    /s/ Jody A. LittrellName:
    
    Jody A. LittrellTitle:
    
    VP - Treasurer
 GUARANTOR:
  By:
    
    /s/ Matt SouzaName:
    
    Matt SouzaTitle:
    
    VP, CAO & Secretary
 4




---



##### 



Schedule A
 Uncertified Files
 5




---



##### 



Schedule B
 Pay Proceeds Files
 6




---



##### 



Schedule C
 Additional Assumed Liabilities
 7
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

A.D., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, 

U.S. SECRET SERVICE, Washington, DC, 

Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 22-0416

Issued: February 8, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On January 27, 2022 appellant filed an appeal from a purported January 13, 2022 decision 

of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards 

assigned the appeal Docket No. 22-0416.

The Board, having duly considered the matter, notes that its jurisdiction is limited to the 

review of final adverse OWCP decisions issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.1 

This jurisdiction encompasses any final decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the date 

appellant filed this appeal.2 The January 13, 2022 decision was a Board decision, not a decision 

of OWCP.3 The most recent final adverse decision issued by OWCP was dated March 11, 2021, 

which is more than 180 days from the date appellant filed this appeal. As there is no final adverse 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2 20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the 

date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.”

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” 20 

C.F.R. § 501.6(d). To the extent that this appeal constitutes a timely petition for reconsideration of the Board’s 

January 13, 2022 decision in Docket No. 21-1205, the Board will address the petition by separate order.
2

OWCP decision over which the Board may properly exercise jurisdiction, the Board concludes

that the appeal docketed as No. 22-0416 must be dismissed. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 22-0416 is dismissed.

Issued: February 8, 2023

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Delegation of Authority 285] 

                    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State, including Section 1 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), and delegated to the Deputy Secretary of State pursuant to Delegation of Authority 245 of April 23, 2001, I hereby delegate to the Director and Deputy Director of the Office of Foreign Missions the certification function vested in the Secretary of State by 26 U.S.C. 893(b) (section 893(b) of the Internal Revenue Code regarding the “Compensation of employees of foreign governments or organizations”).                           ( print page 67774)    

Any function covered by this delegation may also be exercised by the Secretary of State, the Deputy Secretary of State or the Under Secretary for Management. 

Any act, executive order, regulation or procedure subject to, or affected by, this delegation shall be deemed to be such act, executive order, regulation, or procedures as amended from time to time. 

                    This delegation of authority shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

Dated: October 31, 2005. 

Robert B. Zoellick, 

Deputy Secretary of State, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 05-22240 Filed 11-7-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
DOL Reentry Update – Phase 1 Date Moved to

February 28

This message is intended for all DOL employees and contractors.

Colleagues,

I hope you and your loved ones are having a safe and healthy start to the new year.

Based on various factors, including operational considerations and current COVID-19 case trends and transmission

rates, the Coordination Team is adjusting the timeline for increasing the return of Federal staff, onsite contractor staff, and

visitors to DOL workspaces. Phase 1 will now begin no earlier than Monday, February 28, 2022 (rather than the

previous planned reentry date of January 31, 2022). Mission critical onsite work will continue. Thus, employees

performing essential work that cannot be completed from an approved telework site should continue to work

onsite as determined by their agency.

Agencies should ensure that staff identified for Phase 1 reentry who are not currently performing onsite work

but were planning to return beginning January 31 are informed of the changed timing of Phase 1. Agencies have

been planning for a future state of their workforce, including increased use of telework. Consistent with that planning,

managers and employees should engage in discussions about telework agreements regardless of Phase.

As a reminder, the current Resumption of On-Premises Work MOUwhich includes expanded Work Schedule

flexibilities, is in place through the first business day of Phase 1.

Additional details about our reentry schedule, including dates for Phases 2 and 3, can be found on LaborNet. Recently

released guidance on testing and other helpful resources can also be found on LaborNet.

We strongly encourage all eligible individuals to receive a COVID-19 booster dose as soon as possible. Medical experts

continue to stress that the best way to protect yourself and others is by being fully vaccinated and receiving a booster as

soon as you are eligible. The CDC has a new page with helpful information on staying up to date with your COVID-19

vaccine.

Employees will continue to be granted administrative leave to obtain an additional dose of the COVID-19 vaccine and/or

a COVID-19 booster, or to accompany a family member who is receiving any dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Full

guidance on the Department’s leave policies related to the vaccine, including administrative leave for employees who

experience side effects, can be found on LaborNet under Employee Messages.

Please be assured that our commitment to employee safety and health is our priority. We will continue to communicate

with you about our plans and any further changes. As always, please visit the DOL COVID-19 page on LaborNet for more

information and reach out to with questions.

Thank you,

LABORNET

■
Rachana Desai Martin (she/her)

Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management 

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management

U.S. Department of Labor

Questions? View the LaborNet page or email us at 

Posted: January 20, 2022
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5641 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to enter into contracts for the transfer of veterans to nonDepartment adult foster homes for veterans who are unable to live 

independently. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 30, 2010 

Mr. BUYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to enter into contracts 

for the transfer of veterans to non-Department adult 

foster homes for veterans who are unable to live independently. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Heroes at Home Act’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5641 IH

1 SEC. 2. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS CONTRACT AU2 THORITY FOR TRANSFER OF VETERANS NON3 DEPARTMENT ADULT FOSTER HOMES. 

4 Section 1720 of title 38, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following new sub6 section: 

7 ‘‘(h)(1) At the request of a veteran who is eligible 

8 to be transferred to a non-Department nursing home 

9 under this section, the Secretary may transfer the veteran 

10 to an adult foster home that meets Department standards 

11 at the expense of the United States pursuant to a contract 

12 entered into between the Secretary and the adult foster 

13 home for such purpose. A veteran who is transferred to 

14 an adult foster home under this subsection shall agree, 

15 as a condition of such transfer, to accept home health 

16 services furnished by the Secretary under section 1717 of 

17 this title. 

18 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘adult 

19 foster home’ means a home designed to provide non-insti20 tutional, long-term, supportive care for veterans who are 

21 unable to live independently and prefer a family setting.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Louis DiNardo, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed the report on Form 10-K/A filed on March 29, 2004of Xicor, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors:
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date: March 29, 2004 /s/ Louis DiNardo   Louis DiNardo, Co-Chairman of the Board,   President and Chief Executive Officer
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

R.B., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, GREAT BRIDGE 

POST OFFICE, Chesapeake, VA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0712

Issued: September 14, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On April 23, 2023 appellantfiled a timely appeal from an April 14, 2023 nonmerit decision 

of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards 

assigned the appeal Docket No. 23-0712.

The Board notes that the April 14, 2023 nonmerit decision denied appellant’s request for 

reconsideration of a December 8, 2022 merit decision. However, on January 14, 2023, appellant 

had filed a timely appeal before the Board from the December 8, 2022 merit decision. That appeal 

was assigned Docket No. 23-0361. As the appeal of the OWCP merit decision in Docket No. 23-

0361 was pendingon April 14, 2023 the OWCP nonmerit decision that is the subject of this appeal

is null and void.1

As OWCP’s April 14, 2023 nonmerit decision is null and void, appellant did not appeal 

from a final adverse decision. As there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP over which 

1 The Board and OWCP may not simultaneously exercise jurisdiction over the same issue(s). 20 C.F.R. 

§§ 501.2(c)(3), 10.626; see D.P., Docket No. 20-1330 (issued February 19, 2021); J.C.,Docket No. 19-1849, n.2 

(issued November 17, 2020); RussellE. Lerman, 43 ECAB 770 (1992); Douglas E. Billings, 41 ECAB 880 (1990).
2

the Board may properly exercise jurisdiction, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No.

23-0712 must be dismissed. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-0712 is dismissed.

Issued: September 14, 2023

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board