alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2007312EN.01001601.xml

| 30.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 312/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 312/16

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1407/2007

of 29 November 2007

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Třeboňský kapr (PGI))

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, and pursuant to Article 17(2) of that Regulation, the Czech Republic’s application to enter the name ‘Třeboňský kapr’ in the register was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, and pursuant to Article 17(2) of that Regulation, the Czech Republic’s application to enter the name ‘Třeboňský kapr’ in the register was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no objections within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 were received by the Commission, that name should be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no objections within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 were received by the Commission, that name should be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 November 2007.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1791/2006 (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ C 66, 22.3.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

| Class 1.7. | — | Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom |
| --- | --- | --- |

Class 1.7.

—

Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom

CZECH REPUBLIC

Třeboňský kapr (PGI).

---
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ameriprise Certificate Company (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Abu M. Arif , as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Jason S. Bartylla , as Principal and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                              
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:August 6, 2018By:/s/ Abu M. ArifAbu M. ArifChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date:August 6, 2018By:/s/ Jason S. BartyllaJason S. BartyllaChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00218-CV

JACQUETTA LOMOSI, Appellant

V.

WOODFAM MANG, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Court at 

Law No. 1

of Tarrant County (2018-003129-1)

March 21, 2019

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. We vacate the trial court’s judgment and dismiss the

appeal as moot.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

 Justice Wade Birdwell
The Honorable William G. Cambridge, Chief Judge, United States Distric t 1 Court for the District of Nebraska. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-1894

___________ John Jozaitis, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Company, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: July 1, 1997 Filed: July 7, 1997

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. John Jozaitis appeals the distr ict court’s judgment for defendant Fort Dearborn

1 Life Insurance Company following a bench trial in h is action brought under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1 132. Having carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record, w e conclude that the district court did not err and that an extended opinion would have no precedent ial value. We decline to address the issues Jozaitis did not preserve below. Se e McKeel v. City of Pine Bluff , 73 F.3d 207, 211 (8th Cir. 1996). As to Jozaitis’s-2-

allegations regarding his counsel’s representation below, we note that a ci vil litigant has no constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel. See Glick v. Henderson , 855 F.2d 536, 541 (8th Cir. 1988). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,490
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        648
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,851
<PP&E>                                           2,126
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,927
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,297
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,579
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,927
<SALES>                                         23,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           12,838
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,893
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,254
<INCOME-TAX>                                         3
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,239
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,239
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### S & S CARPETS, Appellant, v. VALLEY BANK OF NEVADA, a Corporation; FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF NEVADA, a Corporation, Respondents.

No. 9424

April 6, 1978

576 P.2d 750

*Edmund S. Barnett,*Crystal Bay, for Appellant.

*Hale, Lane, Peek, Dennison and Howard,*and *Gregg Zive,*Reno, for Respondents.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

In the instant case, appellant failed to file its statement of lien within the ten-day time period specified by NRS 108.239(2).1 Although the plaintiffs’ third notice was published *166on June 27, 1975, appellant's statement of lien was not filed until July 15, 1975-eight days late. Therefore, on motion of respondents, the district court entered a judgment striking the statement, from which this appeal is taken.

1. Appellant contends his statement of lien should be deemed timely because he filed affidavits indicating the statement was mailed on July 3, allegedly received by the Washoe County Clerk sometime before July 7, and negligently filed late on July 15. We reject that contention.

Appellant mistakenly relies on the so-called "mail-box" rule of contract formation to support his contention that the statement was timely filed when mailed. See, e.g., McCone v. Eccles, 42 Nev. 451, 181 P. 134 (1919). However, NRS 108.239 contemplates filing, not mailing. "A document is not filed when it is deposited in the mails and the risk of loss or delay in transit is on the sender." Wirtz v. Local Union 169, International Hod Carriers, Etc., 246 F.Supp. 741, 750 (D.Nev. 1965). Filing means the actual "delivery of the paper or document in question to the proper officer and its receipt by him to be kept on file." Ibid. In any event, the record is devoid of any evidence (other than appellant's unconfirmed belief) showing when the clerk actually received the statement of lien. Under `such circumstances, we cannot say the district court erred in not finding that it was received before its filing on July 15, and we affirm the order striking the statement.2

2. Appellant also attacks the respondent's motion to strike as not being timely filed. From the record it does not appear this contention was raised in the court below, and we therefore decline to consider the issue on appeal. See, e.g., Nevada State Bank v. Snowden, 85 Nev. 19, 449 P.2d 254 (1969).

The decision of the district court is affirmed.

1

NRS 108.239(2) provides in pertinent part:

> “At the time of filing the complaint and issuing the summons, the plaintiff shall cause a notice to be published at least once a week for 3 successive weeks, in one newspaper . . . notifying all persons holding or claiming liens ... on the *166premises to file with the clerk and serve on the plaintiff and also on the defendant, . . . written statements of the facts constituting their liens, together with the dates and amounts thereof. The statements shall be filed within 10 days of the last publication of notice."

2

No contention has been made that the trial court, as a matter of discretion, should have relieved appellant of its default.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.10(k)



                                  AMENDMENT TO
                    INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT


        This AMENDMENT TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT (this
"Amendment") amends and shall be considered a part of that certain Intellectual
Property Security Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of May 5, 1998, entered
into between PERCEPTIVE SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, INC., a Delaware corporation
("Old PSI") and FOOTHILL CAPITAL CORPORATION, a California corporation
("Lender"), which was filed and recorded with the United States Patent and
Trademark Office on May 20, 1998, in Reel 9245/0547 (for patents) and in Reel
1735/0540 (for trademarks). Old PSI has merged into PERCEPTIVE SCIENTIFIC
INSTRUMENTS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Debtor"). Debtor and
Lender agree as follows:

        1. The introductory paragraph is hereby amended by deleting the same in
its entirety and replacing it with the following:

               "This INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT ("Agreement"),
dated as of May 5, 1998, is entered into between PERCEPTIVE SCIENTIFIC
INSTRUMENTS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Debtor") and FOOTHILL
CAPITAL CORPORATION, a California corporation ("Foothill"), in light of the
following:"

        2. Except as expressly amended or modified pursuant to this Amendment,
the Agreement shall remain otherwise unchanged and in full force and effect.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Debtor and Lender have executed this Amendment as of
the 23 day of March, 1999.

                            FOOTHILL CAPITAL CORPORATION,
                            a California corporation


                            By:    /s/ STEPHEN SCHWARTZ
                               -------------------------------------------------
                            Title:  Assistant Vice President
                                  ----------------------------------------------


                            PERCEPTIVE SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, LLC,
                            a Delaware limited liability company

                            By:     Statspin, Inc.,
                                    a Massachusetts corporation


                            By:   /s/ MARTIN S. McDERMOT
                               -------------------------------------------------
                            Title:  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                                  ----------------------------------------------
#### MOSS v. RAILWAY CO.

No. 527

Case below: 2 N.C. App. 50.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 October 1968.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 217 (Thursday, November 10, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 68470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22486]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health And Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such a 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, Contract Proposal Tech Review 
Panel on Meropenem.
    Date: November 29, 2005.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: The Hotel Lombardy, 209 Pennsylvania Ave., Washington, DC 
20006.
    Contact Person: Kishena C. Wadhwani, PhD, MpH, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, 9000 Rockville Pike, 
MSC 7510, 6100 Building, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-7510. (301) 
496-1485. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b5c2d4d1ddc2d4dbdef5d8d4dcd99bdbdcdd9bd2dac3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c7b0a6a3afb0a6a9ac87aaa6aeabe9a9aeafe9a0a8b1">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 1, 2005.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-22486 Filed 11-9-05; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE v. JONES

No. 31 PC.

Case below: 3 N.C. App. 455.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 1 April 1969.
* District Judge of the Eastern District of Louisiana,

sitting by designation. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-20895

 

TRANS CHEMICAL, LTD.; ET AL,

Plaintiffs

TRANS CHEMICAL, LTD.

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHINA NATIONAL MACHINERY IMPORT AND EXPORT CORPORATION; ET AL,

Defendants,

CHINA NATIONAL MACHINERY IMPORT AND EXPORT CORPORATION;

MOHAMMED H. HALIPOTO, M.D.; ZAREENA HALIPOTO;

UNITED INTERNATIONAL

Defendants-Appellees,

versus

SARDAR A. DUAD KHAN; SHAHWAR DUAD KHAN,

Movants-Appellants.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas 

(H-95-CV-4114)

 

June 11, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges, and DUPLANTIER*,

District Judge.
** Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

2

PER CURIAM:**

We affirm for essentially the same reasons stated by the able

district court. 

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN FORM 10-Q FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,225
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,344
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,627
<INVENTORY>                                      2,812
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,351
<PP&E>                                          98,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 138,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,920
<BONDS>                                         65,266
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,015
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   138,489
<SALES>                                        115,286
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               158,173
<CGS>                                          100,289
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  140,284
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,052
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   928
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,796
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,837
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,276
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,561
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    979
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,582
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

233 South 13th Street, Suite 1600
Lincoln, NE 68508-2041

Two Central Park Plaza
Suite 1501
Omaha, NE 68102
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

                           ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Aliant Communications Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Forms S-3 and S-8 of Aliant Communications Inc. of our report dated
February 7, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Aliant
Communications Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and
the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 1996, and all related schedules, which report appears in the December
31, 1996, annual report on Form 10-K of Aliant Communications Inc.

                                    /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Lincoln, Nebraska
March 25, 1997
Appeal No. 2022AP1215 Cir. Ct. No. 2021GN120

STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS

DISTRICT IV

IN THE MATTER OF THE CONDITION OF R. S.:

J. C.,

 PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

 V.

R. S.,

 RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

FILED

Feb. 16, 2023

Sheila T. Reiff

Clerk of Court of Appeals

ERRATA SHEET

Sheila T. Reiff

Clerk of Court of Appeals

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District I

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District III

Electronic Notice

Christina Plum, Sarah Motiff

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District II

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District IV

Electronic Notice

Hon. Rhonda L. Lanford

Circuit Court Judge

Electronic Notice

Carlo Esqueda

Clerk of Circuit Court

Dane County Courthouse

Electronic Notice

Joseph W. Kryshak

Electronic Notice

Megan Elizabeth Lyneis

Electronic Notice

Randi L. Othrow

Electronic Notice
No. 2022AP1215

2

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that corrections were made to footnote 3 

and to paragraph 24 in the above-captioned opinion which was released on 

February 16, 2023. A corrected electronic version in its entirety is available on the 

court’s website at www.wicourts.gov. 
No. 2022AP1215

3
September 21, 1998


JACO ELECTRONICS, INC.
145 Oser Avenue
Hauppauge, NY  11788

NEXUS CUSTOM ELECTRONICS, INC.
Prospect Street
Brandon, VT  05733

Gentleman:

         Reference  is made to (a) the  Second  Restated  and  Amended  Loan and
Security Agreement between Jaco Electronics,  Inc. and Nexus Custom Electronics,
Inc. as Debtor, and our predecessor-in-interest, The Bank of New York Commercial
Corporation,  as Lender, and each other Lender a party thereto,  dated September
13, 1995, as amended and supplemented  (the "Loan Agreement") and (b) the letter
agreement and amendment dated as of April 10, 1996 among the parties to the Loan
Agreement (the "Letter Agreement").

It is hereby agreed that,  effective as of September 21, 1998, clause (b)(ii) of
the Letter Agreement shall be amended to read in its entirety a follows:

     "(ii)any such  repurchase  occurs  before  September  14,  2000 at the very
          latest; and "

Except as  hereinabove  specifically  set forth,  the Loan  Agreement and Letter
Agreement  shall remain  unmodified  and in full force and effect in  accordance
with their terms.

         If you are in  agreement  with the  foregoing,  please so  indicate  by
signing and returning to us the enclosed copy of this letter.

                                        Very truly yours,

                       BNY FINANCIAL CORPORATION f/k/a THE
                                        BANK OF NEW YORK COMMERCIAL CORPORATION,
                                        as Agent and Lender

                                        By: Frank Imperato
                                        Title: Vice President

                                        FLEET BANK, N.A.,
                                        NATWEST BANK N.A., as Lender

                                        By: Alice Adleberg 
                                        Title: Vice President


AGREED:

JACO ELECTRONICS, INC.

By: Jeffrey D. Gash                       
     Title:  Vice President/Finance

NEXUS CUSTOM ELECTRONICS, INC.

By: Jeffrey D. Gash                       
     Title:  Vice President/Finance