United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

D.M., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT 

OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF 

PRISONS, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL 

INSTITUTION JESUP, Jesup, GA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0609

Issued: October 10, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER REMANDING CASE

Before:

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On March 21, 2023 appellant filed a timely appeal from December 12, 2022 and March 7, 

2023 merit decisions of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of 

the Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 23-0609.

On November 30, 2022 appellant, then a 48-year-old medical officer, filed a traumatic 

injury claim (Form CA-1) alleging that on October 25, 2022 he contracted COVID-19 while in the 

performance of duty. On the reverse side of the claim form, appellant’s supervisor, R.B., stated 

that appellant was entitled to continuation of pay (COP), noting that although appellant “start[ed] 

the [filing] process within 30 days,” appellant had been trying to complete the Form CA-1 for the 

past 40 days, but the Employees’ Compensation Operations and Management Portal (ECOMP)

would not process the form because he had previously worked at another institution. The form did 

not indicate when appellant stopped work. 

Appellant submitted a laboratory test, dated October 25, 2022, which revealed that he

tested positive for COVID-19. 

By decision dated December 12, 2022, OWCP denied appellant’s claim for COP, finding 

that he had not reported his injury on an OWCP-approved form within 30 days of the October 25, 
2

2022 employment injury. It further noted that the decision affected only his entitlement to COP 

and did not affect his entitlement to other compensation benefits. 

On January 5, 2023 appellant requested reconsideration. In a statement of even date, he

explained that he submitted the required forms via ECOMP on October 27, 2022 while out sick at 

home. On October 31, 2022 appellant received an e-mail from his previous duty station in Atlanta

indicating that the form was incorrectly sent to that institution. He resubmitted the form, and 

ECOMP still automatically populated the form with information for the Atlanta duty station. 

Appellant notified ECOMP, as well as personnel of his previous and current duty stations, Atlanta 

and Jesup, respectively. He returned to work on November 7, 2022 and subsequently e-mailed 

employing establishment officials at his current duty station as he had not heard back from 

ECOMP. Appellantmaintained that he was told to resubmit the form a third time on November 30, 

2022 and then receivedconfirmation that it was accepted. He submitted multiple e-mail exchanges 

with officials from the Atlanta and Jesup institutions corroborating this timeline, including an 

October 31, 2022 e-mail from A.A., a safety administrator for the Atlanta institution, to appellant,

and R.B., his supervisor, providing details of a Form CA-1 filed on October 27, 2022. 

In a letter dated January 25, 2023, OWCP requested that the employing establishment 

provide additional information regarding whether appellant had withdrawn his initial ECOMP 

submissions of the Form CA-1. 

A January 5, 2023 memorandum from S.S., an employing establishment safety 

administrator, explained that appellant filed his Form CA-1 twice before the system took the third 

one. He stated that the local institution could not see or process the first two Form CA-1 claims 

within the correct time frames. S.S. requested that appellant’s case be accepted because the failure 

to comply with the time frame was not his fault. 

A.A., a safety administrator for the Atlanta institution, responded to OWCP’s letter on 

February 13, 2023 indicating that appellant withdrew both initial ECOMP submissions because of 

a clerical error. He explained that appellant transferred from Atlanta to Jesup in 2021 . In a 

memorandum of even date, A.A. noted that the earlier submissions went to the Atlanta institution, 

where appellant no longer worked.

By decision dated March 7, 2023, OWCP denied modification of its December 12, 2022 

decision.

The Board, having duly considered the matter, finds that this case is not in posture for 

decision.

Section 8118(a) of FECA authorizes COP, not to exceed 45 days, to an employee who has 

filed a claim for a period of wage loss due to a traumatic injury with his or her immediate superior 

on a form approved by the Secretary of Labor within the time specified in section 8122(a)(2) of 
3

this title.1 This latter section provides that written notice of injury shall be given within 30 days. 2 

The context of section 8122 makes clear that this means within 30 days of the injury. 3

OWCP’s regulations provide, in pertinent part, that, to be eligible for COP, an employee 

must: (1) have a traumatic injury which is job related and the cause of the disability and/or the 

cause of lost time due to the need for medical examination and treatment; (2) file Form CA-1 

within 30 days of the date of the injury (but if that form is unavailable, using another form would 

not alone preclude receipt); and (3) begin losing time from work due to the traumatic injury within 

45 days of the injury.4

FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 at subsection II.2, however, provides that, “The FECA program 

considers COVID-19 to be a traumatic injury since it is contracted during a single workday or shift 

(see 20 C.F.R. § 10.5(ee)), and considers the date of last exposure prior to the medical evidence 

establishing the COVID-19 diagnosis as the Date of Injury since the precise time of transmission 

may not always be known due to the nature of the virus.”

5

In denying appellant’s claim for COP, OWCP failed to consider the date of last exposure 

as the date of injury in accordance with the guidance in FECA Bulletin No. 21-09. This case will 

therefore be remanded for application of FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 with regard to appellant’s claim 

for COP. Following this and other such further development as deemed necessary, OWCP shall 

issue a de novo decision. Accordingly,

1

5 U.S.C. § 8118.

2

Id. at § 8122(a)(2).

3 E.M.,Docket No. 20-0837 (issued January 27 2021); RobertM. Kimzey, 40 ECAB 762-64 (1989); Myra Lenburg, 

36 ECAB 487, 489 (1985).

4

20 C.F.R. § 10.205(a)(1-3); see also T.S., Docket No. 19-1228 (issued December 9, 2019); J.M., Docket No. 

09-1563 (issued February 26, 2010); Dodge Osborne, 44 ECAB 849 (1993); WilliamE. Ostertag, 33 ECAB 

1925 (1982).

5 FECA Bulletin No. 21-09.II.2 (issued April29, 2021). On March 11, 2021 the American Rescue Plan Act of 

2021 (ARPA) was signed into law. Pub. L.No. 117–2. OWCP issued FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 to provide guidance 

regarding the processing of COVID-19 FECA claims as set forth in the ARPA. Previously, COVID-19 claims under 

FECA were processed under the guidelines provided by FECA Bulletin No. 20-05 (issued March31, 2020) and FECA 

Bulletin No. 21-01 (issued October 21, 2020). FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 supersedes FECA Bulletin Nos. 20-05 and 

21-01.
4

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the March 7, 2023 and December 12, 2022 merit 

decisions of the Office of Workers’Compensation Programs are set aside and the case is remanded 

for further proceedings consistent with this order of the Board.

Issued: October 10, 2023

Washington, DC

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board