alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 1996, and to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 2-77496, 33-10631, 33-82560 and
333-19265) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-02001) of our report dated March 21, 1997
(except for Note 8 and Note 14, for which the dates are April 10, 1997 and April
6, 1997, respectively) on our audits of the consolidated balance sheets of
International Remote Imaging Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
1996 and 1995, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996.

/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

Los Angeles, California
April 11, 1997
United States District Court

Southern District of New York

Office of the Clerk

U.S. Courthouse

500 Pearl Street, New York, N.Y. 10007-1213

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X

 BETTY DORCE EXUME.

 V.

 CAYETANO A. MORAN SR.

 

 

 ASSIGNMENT OF A 

 CIVIL CASE AS RELATED 

 

07-CV-3289

 

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X 

 

Pursuant to the memorandum of the Case Processing Assistant, the above-entitled

action is reassigned to the calendar of

JUDGE LEISURE

 

All future documents submitted in this action are to be presented in the Clerk’s

Office of the Southern District Court for filing and shall bear the assigned judge’s initials

after the case number.

The attorney(s) for the plaintiff(s) are requested to serve a copy of the Notice of

Reassignment on all defendants. 

J. Michael McMahon, CLERK

Dated: 5/4/07

By: JULIAANN SCHEIB

 Deputy Clerk 

 

 

Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
cc: Attorneys of Record 

PS REASSIGNMENT FORM 

Data Quality Control Revised: March 9, 2001

Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN INSURANCE CORPORATION as Receiver for First Southern Savings Association of Jackson County v. Willie Mae Spears SHORTER, Wife of/and Willie B. Shorter.

Civ. A. No. 88-522-A.

United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana.

May 1, 1989.

Kurt D. Englehardt, Little & Metzger, New Orleans, La., for FSLIC.

Yvette Mansfield Alexander, Baton Rouge, La., for Willie Mae Spears Shorter and Willie B. Shorter.

RULING ON MOTION TO CONFIRM UNITED STATES MARSHAL’S SALE

JOHN V. PARKER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff has secured a judgment against the defendants and has caused a Writ of Fieri Facias to issue herein and has caused the property described in the judgment to be seized and sold at public auction by the United States Marshal. Plaintiff was the purchaser at the sale.

Plaintiff now has filed a “Motion to Confirm U.S. Marshal’s Sale.”

The purpose of the motion is uncertain although the proposed order attempts to direct the Marshal to issue a bill of sale to the plaintiff and the order further attempts to cancel certain “inferior liens.”

No authority for such an order has been cited to the court and the court is aware of none.

Under Rule 69, Fed.R.Civ.P., a federal district court follows the procedure established by the state in which it sits in matters of this nature and articles 2342 and 2376 of the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure provide for the issuance of acts of sale as well as for the release of inferior liens — procedures which do not involve the court.

LSA-R.S. 13:4941 et seq. establishes a procedure for monitions and it may be that plaintiff is attempting a monition. If that is the case, plaintiff has failed to follow the procedures set forth by the statute. In the absence of any authority having been submitted to the court which would authorize the issuance of such an order, the “Motion *1377to Confirm U.S. Marshal’s Sale” is hereby DENIED.
AUTHORIZED INSURANCE COMPANIES UNDER THE LONGSHORE AND HARBOR 

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ACT AND EXTENSIONS: 

The U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, Division of 

Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation (DLHWC), renews the authority of each 

authorized insurance company effective July 1 of each year. 

For these renewals, each insurance carrier is requested to acknowledge and agree to meet the 

following conditions for continuing authority: 

1. comply with all statutory and regulatory obligations, including meeting timeliness for 

paying benefits and reporting information [Section 14(a) – (i)]; 

2. utilize the informal dispute resolution mechanisms in good faith by bringing only issues 

that are ready for resolution (i.e. all documentation is available) and sending 

representatives who are both prepared to and have authority to resolve issues; 

3. participate and cooperate with all efforts by professional and trade associations to selfpolice industry compliance; 

4. monitor and be held responsible for the performance in numbers 1 – 2 above of their 

Third Party Administrator (TPA) or other claims handlers; 

5. respond to all penalty assessments in a timely manner. 

6. Full compliance with the provisions of the Longshore Act 33 U.S.C. 901, et. seq.); 

[specifically on the performance of administrative duties and the timeliness of meeting all 

reporting requirements under the Regulations Governing the Administration of the 

Longshore Act at 20 CFR 702.147(a)]; and 

7. Compliance with data reporting and proof of coverage processes. Please contact NCCI 

and the applicable Independent Rating Bureaus to establish and test the reporting 

requirements. 

This statement, signed by a corporate officer, should be returned to this Office prior to July 1st

(each year). Please complete all of the required information and send it to the address at the top 

of this letter. 

Any questions may be referred to the insurance branch of this Office at (202) 693-0038. 

Miranda Chiu, Director 

Division of Longshore and 

Harbor Workers’ Compensation 

 Acknowledged: _________________________________ 

 Signature of Officer 

 _________________________________ 

 Typed Name of Officer 

 Title of Officer 

 Company Name
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 12, 2013

t0409 

# Order

April 12, 2013

144875 (52)

BETH HOFFMAN, Personal Representative

of the Estate of EDGAR BROWN, Deceased,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144875

COA: 289011

Calhoun CC: 2003

- 003576

- NH

DR. PETER BARRETT,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration is considered, and it is

DENIED. We reaffirm the principle stated more than 100 years ago in Peoples v Evening

News Ass’n , 51 Mich 11, 21 (1883), that “rehearing will not be ordered on the ground

merel y that a change of members of the bench has either taken place, or is about to

occur.” The same is true for reconsideration. Likewise, we elect to apply MCR

2.119(F)(3) to these cases, which states, “[A] motion for rehearing or reconsideration

which mere ly presents the same issues ruled on by the court, either expressly or by

reasonable implication, will not be granted.” MCR 2.119(F)(3). Instead, the moving

party must demonstrate “a palpable error by which the court and the parties have been

misled and show that a different disposition of the motion must result from correction of

the error.” Id . In this case, the moving party has failed to satisfy either of these

requirements and has, therefore, failed to demonstrate grounds for reconsideration.

Fu rther, the Court has published for comment proposed amendments of MCR

7.313(E) and MCR 7.313(F) to incorporate into the Court’s rules the standards set forth

in MCR 2.119(F)(3) with regard to motions for rehearing and reconsideration. The

publication orde r that contains the proposed rule changes is attached.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 11 (C)



                                    EXHIBIT
                       Computation of Earnings Per Share
                          Year Ended December 31, 1994
                     (in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               Assuming
                                                               Primary       Full Dilution   
                                                           -------------    --------------
<S>                                                        <C>              <C>
Weighted average common shares outstanding                        11,576            11,576
Other dilutive securities                                             49             1,694
                                                           -------------    --------------

Total shares outstanding for calculation                          11,625            13,270
                                                           =============    ==============

Net income - as reported                                   $         571    $          571
Deduct:  Dividends on Cumulative
  Convertible Preferred Stock                                        (62)              (62)
                                                           -------------    -------------- 

Net income for calculation                                 $         509    $          509
                                                           =============    ==============

Net income per share                                       $         .04    $          .04
                                                           =============    ==============
</TABLE>
# L_2007329EN.01000501.xml

| 14.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 329/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 329/5

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1469/2007

of 13 December 2007

amending the Annex to Council Regulation No 79/65/EEC as regards the list of divisions

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation No 79/65/EEC of 15 June 1965 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Economic Community (1), and in particular Article 2a thereof,

Having regard to the request of Portugal,

Whereas:

| (1) | A list of divisions within the meaning of Article 2(d) of Regulation No 79/65/EEC is laid down in the Annex to that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

A list of divisions within the meaning of Article 2(d) of Regulation No 79/65/EEC is laid down in the Annex to that Regulation.

| (2) | According to that Annex, Portugal is divided into five divisions. For the purposes of Regulation No 79/65/EEC Portugal has requested to reduce the number of divisions by merging the divisions ‘Entre Douro e Minho e Beira Litoral’ and ‘Trás-os-montes e Beira Interior’ into one division ‘Norte e Centro’. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

According to that Annex, Portugal is divided into five divisions. For the purposes of Regulation No 79/65/EEC Portugal has requested to reduce the number of divisions by merging the divisions ‘Entre Douro e Minho e Beira Litoral’ and ‘Trás-os-montes e Beira Interior’ into one division ‘Norte e Centro’.

| (3) | Regulation No 79/65/EEC should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation No 79/65/EEC should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Community Committee for the Farm Accountancy Data Network, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Community Committee for the Farm Accountancy Data Network,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex to Regulation No 79/65/EEC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from the 2008 accounting year.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 2007.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ 109, 23.6.1965, p. 1859. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1791/2006 (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p. 1).

1

---

ANNEX

In the Annex to Regulation No 79/65/EEC, the part concerning Portugal is replaced by the following:

‘Portugal

| 1. | Norte e Centro; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Ribatejo-Oeste; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Alentego e Algarve; |
| --- | --- |

3.

| 4. | Açores e Madeira.’ |
| --- | --- |

4.

---
Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 24      Filed 04/25/2007     Page 1 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 24      Filed 04/25/2007     Page 2 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 24      Filed 04/25/2007     Page 3 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 24      Filed 04/25/2007     Page 4 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 24      Filed 04/25/2007     Page 5 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 24      Filed 04/25/2007     Page 6 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 24      Filed 04/25/2007     Page 7 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 24      Filed 04/25/2007     Page 8 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 24      Filed 04/25/2007     Page 9 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 24      Filed 04/25/2007     Page 10 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 24      Filed 04/25/2007     Page 11 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 24      Filed 04/25/2007     Page 12 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 24      Filed 04/25/2007     Page 13 of 14

Case 1:07-cv-03308-TPG     Document 24      Filed 04/25/2007     Page 14 of 14
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 24 (Monday, February 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 6441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2263]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than February 22, 2005.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Patrick Wilder, Assistant Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Michael J. Rivers, Winona, Minnesota; to acquire voting shares 
of Central Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc., Wausau, Wisconsin, and 
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Bank of Wausau, Wausau, 
Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 1, 
2005.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-2263 Filed 2-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode)

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code), I, Wm. Stacy Locke, President and Chief Executive Officerof Pioneer Drilling Company, a Texas corporation (the “Company”), herebycertify, to my knowledge, that:

 

(1)           the Company’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: | June 28, 2004 | /s/ Wm. Stacy Locke                   |   |
|--------|--------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |               | Wm. Stacy Locke                       |
|   |               | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY

COMPANY OF AMERICA, a

Connecticut corporation,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KB HOME COASTAL, INC., a California

corporation; KB HOME NORTH BAY,

INC., a California corporation; KB HOME

CENTRAL VALLEY, INC., a California

corporation; KB HOME SACRAMENTO,

INC., a California corporation,

 Defendants - Appellants.

No. 13-55161

D.C. No. 2:12-cv-07198-DSF-JC

ORDER*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 8, 2014

Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, BEA, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

FILED

NOV 20 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Defendants-Appellants’ motion to voluntarily dismiss the above-captioned

appeal is GRANTED. Costs are awarded to the Plaintiff-Appellee.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
Travelers Property Casualty Company v. KB Home Coastal, Inc., No. 13-55161

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the order granting dismissal.

For the reasons stated in Plaintiff-Appellee’s opposition to the motion to

dismiss, I respectfully dissent from the order granting the opposed dismissal. As the

parties are engaged in numerous ongoing district court proceedings and, given the

nature of the parties’ businesses, will likely face again the issuesraised on appeal, the

panel should provide a ruling that gives direction to the district courts. In addition,

asthis appeal has been pending for almost two years, Defendants-Appellants’ motion

has been made at the eleventh hour for no other reason than a fear of losing its appeal

after having heard the tenor of panel questioning at oral argument. Granting dismissal

at this late stage further encourages improper gamesmanship by parties. That

Defendants-Appellants would rather withdraw the appeal than face a potential loss

reinforces the conclusion that this issue is likely to reappear. One can only conclude

that Defendants-Appellants are motivated purely by a fear that the Ninth Circuit will

issue controlling authority that will negatively impact future litigation. 

FILED

NOV 20 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                         28,349
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  77,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,063
<INVENTORY>                                    17,270
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               134,579
<PP&E>                                         472,261
<DEPRECIATION>                                 149,497
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 563,663
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          107,055
<BONDS>                                        172,531
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    5,792
<COMMON>                                       4,248
<OTHER-SE>                                     138,029
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   563,663
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               317,278
<CGS>                                          182,113
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  283,603
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8,352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                9,348
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,889
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,459
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,459
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.16



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 24.1--POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW  ALL MEN BY THESE  PRESENTS,  that  each  person  whose  signature
appears  below  constitutes  and  appoints  Steven G. Mihaylo and Kurt R. Kneip,
jointly  and  severally,   his   attorneys-in-fact,   each  with  the  power  of
substitution,  for him in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this
Report on Form  10-K,  and to file the same,  with  exhibits  thereto  and other
documents in connection therewith,  with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact,  or his
substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
this  Report has been  signed  below by the  following  persons on behalf of the
Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

         Signature                            Title                      Date

/S/ Steven G. Mihaylo        Chairman and Chief                  March 23, 1998
---------------------        Executive Officer
Steven G. Mihaylo

/S/ Kurt R. Kneip            Vice President and                 March 23, 1998
---------------------        Chief Financial Officer
Kurt R. Kneip

/S/ J. Robert Anderson       Director                           March 23, 1998
---------------------
J. Robert Anderson

/S/ Gary D. Edens            Director                           March 23, 1998
---------------------
Gary D. Edens

/S/ Maurice H. Esperseth     Director                           March 23, 1998
------------------------
Maurice H. Esperseth

/S/ C. Roland Haden          Director                           March 23, 1998
---------------------
C. Roland Haden

/S/ Norman Stout             Director                           March 23, 1998
---------------------
Norman Stout