alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21-2301V

UNPUBLISHED

ALYSSA WILFONG,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: August 16, 2022

Withdrawal of petition; Order 

concluding proceedings

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On December 17, 2021, Alyssa Wilfong filed a petition for compensation the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—10 through 34.

2

Petitioner alleged that she suffered injuries after receiving a human papillomavirus 

vaccination on December 19, 2018. ECF No. 1.

Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified in Vaccine 

Rule 10(b), a notice issued advising that “that the petitioner may withdraw the petition 

under section 300aa—21(b) of this title or the petitioner may choose under section 

300aa—21(b) of this title to have the petition remain before the special master.” 42 

U.S.C. § 300aa—12(g). On August 15, 2022, Petitioner timely filed a notice to withdraw 

the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—21(b). 

In light of Petitioner’s election to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa—21(b) (promulgated as Vaccine Rule 10(d)), Petitioner’s request to withdraw the

petition is GRANTED. Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that 

proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment 

“on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk’s Office.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United 

States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal 

Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available 

to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, 

I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.
2

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5551 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to make a certification when making purchases under the Small Business 

Lending Fund Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5551 EH

1 SECTION 1. CERTIFICATION UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS 

2 LENDING FUND PROGRAM. 

3 Before the Secretary of the Treasury makes the first 

4 purchase (including a commitment to purchase) under the 

5 Small Business Lending Fund Program under the Small 

6 Business Jobs and Credit Act of 2010, the Secretary shall 

7 certify, under oath, to the Inspector General of the De8 partment of the Treasury, with a copy to the Comptroller 

9 General of the United States, that the purchase-decision 

10 process has been designed so that each purchase decision 

11 is made solely on the basis of economic fundamentals and 

12 not because of any political considerations. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 23, 2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5551 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to make 

Small Business Lending Fund Program. a certification when making purchases under the
EXHIBIT 23.0--CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the  incorporation by reference on page 35 in this Annual
Report  (Form 10-K) of our report dated  February 26, 1999  included in the 1998
Annual Report to Shareholders of Inter-Tel, Incorporated.

         Our audit also included the financial  statement schedule of Inter-Tel,
Incorporated  listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is the  responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based upon our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered  in  relation  to the basic  financial  statements  taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

         We also  consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  Registration
Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  33-58161),  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-3  No.
33-61437),  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  333-01735),   Registration
Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  333-12433),  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-3 No.
333-39221),   Registration  Statement  (Form  S-8  No.  2-94805),   Registration
Statement  (Form  S-8  No.  33-40353),  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-8  No.
33-73620),  Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-41197) and in Registration
Statement  (Form S-8 No.  333-67261) of our report dated February 26, 1999, with
respect  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements   incorporated  herein  by
reference and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the
financial  statement  schedule  included  in this Annual  Report  (Form 10-K) of
Inter-Tel, Incorporated.

                                                  /s/  Ernst & Young LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
March 26, 1999

                                       54
# L_2007122EN.01001701.xml

| 11.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 122/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 122/17

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 513/2007

of 10 May 2007

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 958/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 10 May 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 10 May 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 10 May 2007, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 shall be 35,085 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 May 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 May 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 247/2007 (OJ L 69, 9.3.2007, p. 3).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 49. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 203/2007 (OJ L 61, 28.2.2007, p. 3).

2

---
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wisconsin Power and Light Company (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ William D. Harvey

William D. Harvey

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

/s/ Eliot G. Protsch

Eliot G. Protsch

Chief Financial Officer

 

May 1, 2008
#### BIBICOFF & ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant, v. STAN FULTON, Respondent.

No. 22691

October 22, 1992

839 P.2d 133

*Hale, Lane, Peek, Dennison & Howard*and *Richard L. Elmore,*Las Vegas, for Appellant.

*Lionel Sawyer & Collins*and *David N. Frederick,*Las Vegas, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Appellant, Harvey Bibicoff, claims that he and respondent, Stan Fulton, entered into an oral contract whereby Fulton agreed to pay to Bibicoff a fee if Bibicoff successfully obtained a buyer for Fulton’s stock. Fulton denies any such agreement was made. There are many issues of fact relating to the existence of the claimed contract, and, as well, to Bibicoff’s claim based on *quantum meruit*and to his claim for fraud based on Fulton’s making a promise that he did not intend to keep. Summary judgment should not have been granted under these circumstances; therefore, we reverse the judgment of the district court.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 210 (Tuesday, November 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 65909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21656]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel Review of Research Project (R01) Applications
    Date: November 30, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Loews Annapolis Hotel, 126 West Street, Annapolis, MD 
21401.
    Contact Person: Katherine M. Malinda, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Affairs, 
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7198, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/
435-0297.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel Review of Research Project (RO1) Applications
    Date: November 30, 2005.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center 
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Patricia A. Haggerty, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/NIH, 
Clinical Studies & Training Studies Rev. Grp., Division of 
Extramural Affairs/Section Chief, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7194, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/435-0288.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)


    Dated: October 20, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-21656 Filed 10-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-1084

___________

Everick Lovosier Monk, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

* Appeal from the United States

Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * District Court for the

Department of Correction; Claude * Eastern District of Arkansas.

Wilburn, OCS: Printing & Graphic *

Arts Supervisor, Wrightsville Unit, *

Arkansas Department of Correction; * [UNPUBLISHED]

David Guntharp, Assistant Director, *

Arkansas Department of Correction; *

Clifford Terry, Warden, Wrightsville *

Unit, Arkansas Department of *

Correction, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: May 28, 1999

 Filed: June 7, 1999

___________

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1The HONORABLE HENRY WOODS, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the

HONORABLE HENRY L. JONES, JR., United States Magistrate Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-

Arkansas inmate Everick Lovosier Monk appeals from the district court’s1

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After carefully reviewing the record and the

parties’ submissions, we conclude dismissal was proper for the reasons the district

court stated and an extended discussion is not warranted. Accordingly, we affirm the

judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**EXHIBIT      32 – SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

**Certification      of Principal Executive Officer **

**Pursuant      to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C.      1350**

|   | (1) | The                Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                August 29, 2008 | /s/                A.L. Giannopoulos          |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                 |                   A.L. Giannopoulos |

----

**Certification      of Principal Executive Officer **

**Pursuant      to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C.      1350**

|   | (1) | The                Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                August 29, 2008 | /s/                Gary C. Kaufman          |
|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                 |                   Gary C. Kaufman |

----
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 27, 2013

NO. 03

- 12

- 00572

- CR

Elisa Gonzales Condarco, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYE AR, PEMBERTON AND RO SE

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s

order : IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that the order of the

trial court is in all things affirmed; and it appearing that the appellant is indigent and unable to

pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certi fied below for

observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN FORM 10-Q FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,912
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,043
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,188
<INVENTORY>                                      2,274
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,475
<PP&E>                                          93,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,932
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 130,978
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,599
<BONDS>                                         63,166
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            67
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   130,978
<SALES>                                         53,040
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,640
<CGS>                                           45,747
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,758
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   359
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,251
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,389
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,322
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,067
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    928
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,089
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14


</TABLE>
# L_2007222EN.01002301.xml

| 28.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 222/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 222/23

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 964/2007 of 14 August 2007 laying down detailed rules for the opening and administration of the tariff quotas for rice originating in the least developed countries for the marketing years 2007/2008 and 2008/2009

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 213 of 15 August 2007
  )

On page 27, Article 2 (4):

for:

‘Licence applications shall be lodged with the competent authority in the Member State concerned during the first seven working days of the marketing year concerned and, where applicable, in the event of an additional period as referred to in paragraph 7, in the first seven days of the month of February of the same marketing year.’,

read:

‘Licence applications shall be lodged with the competent authority in the Member State concerned during the first seven days of the marketing year concerned and, where applicable, in the event of an additional period as referred to in paragraph 7, in the first seven days of the month of February of the same marketing year.’.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF G.N., A CHILD,

 Appellant.

 

 

§

§

§

 

§

§

§ 

 

§

'

'

No. 08-16-00077-CV

Appeal from the

65th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2014DCM1769)

 O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s first motion for extension of time to file the brief until 

July 12, 2016. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE 

APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Felix Valenzuela, the Appellant’s Attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before July 12, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of June, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
# C_2007116EN.01000701.xml

| 26.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4559 — Balfour Beatty/Galaxy/Exeter Airport)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 116/05)

On 12 March 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4559. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4559. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---