alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

August 26, 2011

Mr. Harry Lloyd Scarborough

Faubus & Scarborough LLP

1010 Lamar Street, Suite 1020

Houston, TX 77002

Mr. Glenn Richard Legge

Legge Farrow Kimmitt McGrath & Brown, LLP

6363 Woodway, Suite 400

Houston, TX 77057

Ms. S. Shawn Stephens

Baker & Hostetler, LLP

1000 Louisiana, Suite 2000 

Houston, TX 77002-5018

RE:Case Number:  08-0890

Court of Appeals Number:  14-07-00970-CV

Trial Court Number:  2004-61582

Style:THE HOUSTON EXPLORATION CO. AND OFFSHORE SPECIALTY FABRICATORS, INC.

v.

WELLINGTON UNDERWRITING AGENCIES, LTD., ET AL.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinion in the above-referenced cause.  You may obtain a copy of the opinion at: http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/082611.asp.  If you would like the opinion by email, please contact Claudia Jenks at claudia.jenks@txcourts.gov or call (512)463-1312 ext. 41367.

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 08-0890Page 2**
April 30 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals WILLIAM C. WEBB , Appellant NO. 14 - 13 - 00278 - CR NO. 14 - 13 - 00279 - CR NO. 14 - 13 - 00280 - CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1388 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1388

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 8, 2019

           Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To manage supply chain risk through counterintelligence training, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supply Chain Counterintelligence 
Training Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. COUNTERINTELLIGENCE TRAINING PROGRAM TO MANAGE SUPPLY CHAIN 
              RISK.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in 
coordination with the Director of National Intelligence, the Secretary 
of Homeland Security, and the Administrator of General Services, shall 
establish and implement a counterintelligence training program for 
officials with supply chain risk management responsibilities at 
executive agencies (including programmatic, information communications 
technology, and acquisition officials). The program shall be designed 
to prepare such personnel to identify and mitigate counterintelligence 
threats that arise during the acquisition and use throughout the 
lifecycle of information and communications technology.

SEC. 3. REPORTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF PROGRAM.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, and every 180 days for the next three years, the Director of the 
Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with the Director of 
National Intelligence, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the 
Administrator of General Services, shall submit to the appropriate 
congressional committees and leadership a report on implementation of 
the program required under section 2.

SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Appropriate congressional committees and leadership; 
        information and communications technology.--The terms 
        ``appropriate congressional committees and leadership'' and 
        ``information and communications technology'' have the meanings 
        given the terms in section 4713(k) of title 41, United States 
        Code.
            (2) Executive agency.--The term ``executive agency'' has 
        the meaning given the term in section 133 of title 41, United 
        States Code.

            Passed the Senate November 7, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
# EXHIBIT  99.2

# Certification
Of Chief Financial Officer Of Ocean Energy, Inc.Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As
Adopted Pursuant ToSection  906 Of The SarbanesOxley Act Of 2002

I,
William L. Transier, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Ocean Energy, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the
Companys amendment to its annual report on Form 10K for the period ended December 31, 2002
and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 24, 2003
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Report) by the Company fully complies with the requirements of that
section.

I
further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ William L.
Transier Name: William L. TransierTitle: Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer Date: April 24, 2003
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t, a n dw e th e r e f o r e d e n yS p ic e r ’s r e q u e s t f o ro r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T TH O M A S O . SPI CER, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. C I T Y O F S I MI VA L L E Y, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 08- 56262 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 7 - c v - 0 4 9 7 3 - A H MFFM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia A . H ow a r d M a t z , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l5, 2010 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , M cK E O W N , P A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. T ho m as O . S pi ce r app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ctcourt ’ s s um m ary ju d g m e n t in h is A m e r ic a n s w ith D is ab ilitie s A c t ( “A D A ” ) a c tio n a lle g in g th e C ity 

# FI LED APR20 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 56262 2 of S i m i V al l eydi sc ri m i nat ed agai nsthi m by i ss ui ng hi m ci t at i on s f or i l l egal pa rki ng. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on pur s ua ntt o 28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de novo, U ni v e rs al H e al th Se rvs . , I

nc . v . T hom ps on , 36 3 F . 3d 10 13 , 10 19 (9th C i r. 20 04 ), a n dw e a f

f i rm. T h e d i s tr i c tc o u rtp r o p e r l yg r a n t e ds u m m a ryj u d g m e n to n S p i c e r ’ s AD A c l a i m be c aus e , a s s um i ng S pi c e rw a s di s abl e d w i thi n the m e a ni ng of the A D A , he f a i l e d t o r a i s e atr i abl e i s s ue a s t o w he the rhe w a s e xc l ude d f r om pa rt i c i pa t i ng i n, o rb e n e f ittin g f r o m , a n ys e rv ic e o rp r o g r a m b e c au s e o f h is d is ab ility . See McG a ry v . C i t yof P or t land , 38 6 F . 3d 12 59 , 12 65 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( l i st i ng el em ent s f or a c la im u n d e rT itle I I o f

th e A D A ) . T o th e e x te n t S p ic e rs e e k s to o v e rtu rn th e s ta te courtj ud gm ent , w e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on pu rs uantt o the R ooke r - Fe ldm an d o c tr in e . See E xx on Mobi l

C or p. v . SaudiB as i c I

ndus . C or

p. , 54 4 U . S . 28 0, 28 4 (20 05 ). S pi ce r’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. A FFI R M ED .
1

Exhibit 11

<TABLE>
IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                

                         Three Months Ended      Six Months Ended
                               June 30,              June 30,
                         1997       1996        1997       1996
                         ----       ----        ----       ----

PRIMARY

<S>                      <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>
Average number of shares
 outstanding             11,166,426  11,353,306  11,238,743  11,345,632

Assumed exercise of stock
 options                    296,611     259,880     308,948     263,980
                         ----------------------------------------------

Total shares             11,463,037  11,613,186  11,547,691  11,609,612
                         ==============================================

Net income               $5,768,395  $5,027,737 $10,964,671 $10,015,973
                         ==============================================

Net income per share          $0.50       $0.43       $0.95       $0.86
                             ======      ======      ======      ======

FULLY DILUTED

Average number of shares
 outstanding             11,166,426  11,353,306  11,238,743  11,345,632

Assumed exercise of stock
 options  (Note 1)          316,550     259,880     329,717     263,980
                          ---------------------------------------------

Total shares             11,482,976  11,613,186  11,568,460  11,609,612
                         ==============================================

Net income               $5,768,395  $5,027,737 $10,964,671 $10,015,973
                         ==============================================

Net income per share          $0.50       $0.43       $0.95       $0.86
                             ======      ======      ======      ======
</TABLE>
(1)  The dilutive effect of stock options is based on the
treasury stock method using the higher of the average market price for the
period or the period-end market price.

XXX   PAGE 38   XXX
Exhibit 31.4





CERTIFICATION





I, Robert S. Vaters, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of NeoStem, Inc.; and





2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: April 30, 2015








/s/ Robert S. Vaters


Name: Robert S. Vaters


Title: President and Chief Financial Officer of NeoStem, Inc.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to NeoStem, Inc. and will be retained by NeoStem, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5605 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

47 East Fayette Street in Uniontown, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘George 

C. Marshall Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2010 

Mr. CRITZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 47 East Fayette Street in Uniontown, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘George C. Marshall Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GEORGE C. MARSHALL POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 47 East Fayette Street in 

6 Uniontown, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated 

7 as the ‘‘George C. Marshall Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5605 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘George C. Marshall 

3 Post Office’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
# CP Completed
#### Estherline PENDLETON v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN, INC.

No. 91 C 227.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

April 25, 1991.

Frank W. Petro, F. Daniel Petro, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Robert J. Prendergast, Kenneth J. Wyso-glad & Associates, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

ORDER

BUA, District Judge.

Plaintiff Estherline Pendleton has filed a FELA action for injuries she allegedly received while operating a pin lifter in the course of uncoupling railroad cars in a Burlington Northern railroad yard. She seeks $900,000 for her injuries.

Defendant has moved to transfer the suit from this district to the Central District of Illinois, Peoria Division. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.

28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) provides that for the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.

In this case, venue is proper in both this forum and the forum where defendant seeks to transfer the case, the Central District of Illinois. The relevant question, then, is whether transfer is more convenient for the parties as well as the witnesses, and in the interests of justice.

The convenience of parties and witnesses appears to favor transfer of the case. Defendant has named three testifying witnesses who reside in the Central District of Illinois. In addition, the site of the events leading to plaintiff’s injury is located in the Central District. Plaintiff also resides in the Central District. Although plaintiff has named two doctors from this district who have examined her, she has not indicated whether they will testify at trial.

*1360The interests of justice, though, favor this district. Since plaintiff chose her place of venue pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 56, her choice of this district as the forum court should be given added weight. In addition, a firm trial date has already been set in this court. At the present time, this court has a mere 140 cases on its docket, unlike the backlog of cases in other courts. The parties can be assured, then, of an expeditious trial. Nor has defendant identified any prejudice it would suffer if the case were heard in this district. Defendant has not represented that its witnesses would be unavailable to testify if the action were brought in this district.

Although it is a close question, the court finds that the interests of justice outweigh concerns about the convenience of parties and witnesses. Therefore, defendant’s motion to transfer is denied.
Careview Communications, Inc. 8-K


Exhibit 10.35


 


HEALTHCOR HYBRID OFFSHORE MASTER FUND,
L.P.


 


ALLONGE NO. 4
TO SENIOR SECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTE 


(issued April 21, 2011)


 


March 8, 2022


 


This Allonge No. 4 to Senior Secured Convertible
Note (this “Allonge”) shall be affixed to that certain Senior Secured Convertible Note dated April 21, 2011
(as amended by Allonge No. 1 to Senior Secured Convertible Note dated June 26, 2015, Allonge No. 2 to Senior Secured Convertible
Note, dated July 10, 2018, and Allonge No. 3 to Senior Secured Convertible Note, dated April 20, 2021, the “Note”),
issued in the original principal amount of $10,684,000, made by CareView Communications, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”)
and payable to the order of HealthCor Hybrid Offshore Master Fund, L.P. (the “Holder”), and shall become a permanent
part thereof and shall amend the Note as provided herein.


 


	1.	Amendment to Maturity Date. The second sentence
of Section 1 of the Note is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:



 


The “Maturity Date” shall be the
earlier to occur of (a) April 20, 2023 or (b) 120 calendar days following a written demand for payment by the Holder to the Company;
provided, that such written demand may not be given prior to the twelve month anniversary of the date on which the obligations
of the Company under the PDL Credit Agreement are repaid in full.


 


2.           No Further Amendments;
Authorization to Affix to Note. Except as specifically amended hereby, the Note shall remain in full force and effect. The
Company hereby authorizes the Holder to affix this Allonge to the Note and it shall for all purposes henceforth be part of the
Note.


 


[signature page follows]


 




     


     


    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused
this Allonge to be executed by its officer thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first above written.


 


	 	COMPANY:
	 	 	 
	 	CAREVIEW COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
	 	a Nevada corporation
	 	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Steven G. Johnson
	 	Name:  Steven Johnson
	 	Title:    Chief Executive Officer


 


	AGREED AND ACCEPTED:	 
	 	 	 
	HOLDER:	 
	 	 	 
	HEALTHCOR HYBRID OFFSHORE MASTER FUND, L.P.	 
	By:	HealthCor Hybrid Offshore G.P., LLC, as General Partner 	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Laurie Hadick	 	 
	Name:	Laurie Hadick	 
	Title:	CCO	 


 


[Signature Page
to Allonge No. 4 to CareView Communications Inc. Secured Convertible Note

Issued April 21, 2011 (Hybrid Fund)]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Business Board (DBB) will meet in open session on Thursday, December 1, 2005, at the Pentagon, Washington, DC from 9:45 a.m. until 12 p.m. (noon). The mission of the DBB is to advise the Secretary of Defense on effective strategies for implementation of best business practices of interest to the Department of Defense. At this meeting, the Board will deliberate on their findings and recommendations related to: Healthcare for Military Retirees; Military Postal Service; and Business Management Modernization Program (BMMP).

# DATES:

Thursday, December 1, 2005, 9:45 a.m. to 12 p.m. (noon).

# ADDRESSES:

1155 Defense Pentagon, 3C288, Washington, DC 20301-1155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting must contact the Defense Business Board no later than Tuesday, November 22nd for further information about escort arrangements in the Pentagon. Additionally, those who wish to make oral comments or deliver written comments should also request to be scheduled, and submit a written text of the comments by Monday, November 21st to allow time for distribution to the Board members prior to the meeting. Individual oral comments will be limited to five minutes, with the total oral comment period not exceeding 30 minutes.

                        The DBB may be contacted at: Defense Business Board, 1155 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C288, Washington, DC 20301-1155, via e-mail at                         *defensebusinessboard2@osd.mil*                         or via phone at (703) 697-2168.                    

Dated: November 4, 2005.

L.M. Bynum,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 05-22410 Filed 11-9-05; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1286

THADDEUS MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. DR. HECTOR COLLISON, Estate of, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00286-JFM)

Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 1, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thaddeus Moore, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Thaddeus Moore appeals the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim of Moore’s medical malpractice practice suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Estate of Collison , Case No. 1:09-cv-00286-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### CITIZENS ASSOC. v. CITY OF WASHINGTON

No. 91 PC.

Case below: 45 N.C App. 7.

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 May 1980.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Express
Certificate Company (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Paula R. Meyer, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and
Brian J. McGrane, as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d)
              of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



    /s/ Paula R. Meyer
    --------------------
Name:   Paula R. Meyer
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
Date:   May 10, 2004




    /s/ Brian J. McGrane
    ----------------------
Name:   Brian J. McGrane
Title:  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date:   May 10, 2004


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
and is not being "filed" as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to liability under that
section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically
incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.