alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.0--CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in  Registration  Statement
(Form  S-3 No.  33-58161),  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  33-61437),
Registration  Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-01735),  Registration  Statement (Form
S-3  No.   333-12433),   Registration   Statement  (Form  S-3  No.   333-39221),
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 2-94805),  Registration Statement (Form S-8
No.  33-40353),  Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No.  33-73620),  Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No.  333-41197) and in Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-67261)  of  our  reports  dated  February  11,  2000,  with  respect  to the
consolidated  financial  statements and schedule  included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) of Inter-Tel, Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 1999.


Phoenix, Arizona                            /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
March 15, 2000
#### RANDOLPH v. SCHUYLER

No. 128 PC.

Case below: 18 N.C. App. 393.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 2 October 1973.
LNH REIT, INC.
                        POWER OF ATTORNEY


     The undersigned Director of LNH REIT, Inc., a Maryland
Trust, hereby constitutes and appoints N. Keith McKey as the true
and lawful Attorney-in-fact and Agent of the undersigned to sign
on behalf of the undersigned:  (a)  the Annual Report of the
Company on Form 10-KSB  (or such other form as may be required)
for the year ended December 31, 1995 to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"); and (b) any and all
amendments to such Report as may be required to be filed with the
SEC.

                                             /s/ H.C. Bailey
                                        H.C. Bailey, Jr.
                                        Director

Date:     3-15-96

                         LNH REIT, INC.
                        POWER OF ATTORNEY


     The undersigned Director of LNH REIT, Inc., a Maryland
Trust, hereby constitutes and appoints N. Keith McKey as the true
and lawful Attorney-in-fact and Agent of the undersigned to sign
on behalf of the undersigned:  (a)  the Annual Report of the
Company on Form 10-KSB  (or such other form as may be required)
for the year ended December 31, 1995 to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"); and (b) any and all
amendments to such Report as may be required to be filed with the
SEC.

                                        /s/ George R. Farish
                                        George R. Farish
                                        Director

Date:     3-18-96

                         LNH REIT, INC.
                        POWER OF ATTORNEY


     The undersigned Director of LNH REIT, Inc., a Maryland
Trust, hereby constitutes and appoints N. Keith McKey as the true
and lawful Attorney-in-fact and Agent of the undersigned to sign
on behalf of the undersigned:  (a)  the Annual Report of the
Company on Form 10-KSB  (or such other form as may be required)
for the year ended December 31, 1995 to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"); and (b) any and all
amendments to such Report as may be required to be filed with the
SEC.

                                             /s/ Ted Enloe
                                        Ted Enloe
                                        Director

Date:     3-15-96
Exhibit 23

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.2-64879, 2-80037, 33-18081, 33-23793, 33-41485, 33-43459, 33-45479, 33-55825,33-58851, 33-64345, 333-8141, 333-38131, and 333-52056 of Sears, Roebuck andCo.; Registration Statement Nos. 33-58139, 33-64215, 33-9817, 333-30879, and333-62847 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears Roebuck Acceptance Corp.;Registration Statement Nos. 33-64775, 333-18591, and 333-43309 of Sears, Roebuckand Co. and Sears, Roebuck and Co. Deferred Compensation Plan; RegistrationStatement Nos. 33-57205, 333-11973, 333-53149, 333-92501, and 333-56272 ofSears, Roebuck and Co. and the Sears 401(k) Savings Plan (formerly, The Savingsand Profit Sharing Fund of Sears Employees and the Sears 401(k) Profit SharingPlan); Registration Statement No. 33-44671 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and SearsDC Corp.; and Registration Statement No. 333-72514 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. andthe 2001 Broad-Based Stock Option Plan; of our report dated February 8, 2002,appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sears, Roebuck and Co. for theyear ended December 29, 2001.

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

Chicago, IllinoisMarch 13, 2002
Exhibit 10.9.4

AMENDMENT NO. 4

TO THE

UNIFIED WESTERN GROCERS, INC.

EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN

Unified Western Grocers, Inc. (the Company) hereby amends the above-named plan (the Plan), effective as of October 1, 2004,
as follows:

1. The first two sentences of Section 9.1 of the Plan are hereby amended in their entirety to read as follows:

The Company, acting through the Board of Directors, or the Committee may amend the Plan from time to time and may amend or cancel any
such amendment. Each amendment must be set forth in a document that is signed by an officer of the Company, and the Plan shall be deemed to have been amended in the manner and at the time set forth in such document, and all Participants shall be
bound by it.

2. Section 8.6 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

Section 8.6: Administrative Expenses Of The Plan. All reasonable expenses of administering the Plan, including, but
not limited to, actuarial, administration, accounting, investment, recordkeeping, and legal fees and costs incurred in connection with such activities, shall be paid by the Trustee pursuant to the direction of the Committee and shall be a charge
against the trust estate, except to the extent that such expenses may be paid by the Company. The Committee, in the Committees sole discretion, shall determine whether each such charge shall be allocated pro rata or per capita to
Participants Accounts, and whether such a charge shall be allocated directly to the Accounts of the affected Participant. The expense of maintaining errors and omissions liability insurance, if any, covering members of the Committee, the
Trustee, or any other Fiduciary shall be paid by the Company.

* * * * *

The Company has caused this Amendment No. 4 to be signed on the date indicated below, to be effective as indicated above.



|                        |  |  |  |                               |  |                |  |                                
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------- |  | -------------- |  | -------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  | Company                    
|                        |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | UNIFIED WESTERN GROCERS, INC.
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: November 15, 2004 |  |  |  | By:                           |  | /s/ Don Gilpin
|                        |  |  |  |                               |  |                |  | Don Gilpin                     
|                        |  |  |  |                               |  | Its:           |  | Vice President, Human Resources
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

L.W., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE, 

Chicago, IL, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 22-0500

Issued: March 22, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On February 14, 2022 appellant filed an appeal from a July 14, 2021 merit decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 22-0500.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act.1 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance 

of OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the July 14, 2021 decision was January 10, 2022. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until February 14, 2022, more than 180 days after the

July 14, 2021 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 22-0500 is 

untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not 

explained his failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e).
2

establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP 

within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed 

as No. 22-0500, must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 22-0500 is dismissed.

Issued: March 22, 2022

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance. ” 

20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d).
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     
 (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for
the periods expressed in the Report.
  /s/ Jack A. HockemaJack A. HockemaChief Executive Officer
#### SAVINGS AND LOAN LEAGUE v. CREDIT UNION COMM.

No. 76 PC.

No. 17 (Fall Term).

Case below: 45 N.C. App. 19.

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 6 May 1980. Motion of respondents to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 6 May 1980.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions set forth
in SEC Release No. 34-47986]c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: November 14, 2005
    /s/ Jack A. HockemaJack A. HockemaChief Executive Officer
DISMISS and Opinion Filed June 8, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00074-CV

CVS PHARMACY, INC., Appellant

V.

FREEMAN EXPOSITIONS, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-12174

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Smith

Opinion by Justice Schenck

Before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal because it has 

resolved its dispute with appellee. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

220074f.p05 /David J. Schenck//

DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

CVS PHARMACY, INC., Appellant

No. 05-22-00074-CV V.

FREEMAN EXPOSITIONS, LLC, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-12174.

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Schenck. Justices Osborne and Smith 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED.

Subject to any agreement between the parties, it is ORDERED that appellee 

FREEMAN EXPOSITIONS, LLC recover its costs of this appeal from appellant 

CVS PHARMACY, INC.

Judgment entered this 8

th day of June, 2022.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7199

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DONNIE KEITH HOWELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-94-56-H) Submitted: December 12, 2001 Decided: December 20, 2001 Before MICHAEL and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donnie Keith Howell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Donnie Keith Howell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Howell , No. CR-94-56-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2000 & Dec. 14, 2000).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Order entered October 24, 2012

In The 

## Court of Ztppeat5 jfiftb 313i5tritt of 1lexa5 at 1Daffa5

No. 05-12-01103-CV NATIONSBUILDERS INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., Appellant V. HOUSTON INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE GROUP, LTD., ET AL., Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 12-06111 

### ORDER The Court has before it appellant's October 22, 2012 unopposed motion to seal redacted portions of appellant's brief on accelerated appeal of order vacating arbitration award. The Court GRANTS the motion and DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to place the unredacted version of appellant's reply brief under seal.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5609 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5609

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 to prohibit any person 
  from performing lobbying activities on behalf of a client which is 
     determined by the Secretary of State to be a State sponsor of 
                               terrorism.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES ON BEHALF OF STATE SPONSORS 
              OF TERRORISM.

    The Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 27. PROHIBITING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES ON BEHALF OF STATE SPONSORS 
              OF TERRORISM.

    ``No person may perform lobbying activities on behalf of a client 
which is a country the government of which the Secretary of State has 
determined, for purposes of section 6(j) of the Export Administration 
Act of 1979 (as continued in effect pursuant to the International 
Emergency Economic Powers Act), section 40 of the Arms Export Control 
Act, section 620A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, or any other 
provision of law, is a government that has repeatedly provided support 
for acts of international terrorism.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 1, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5609

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 to prohibit any person 
  from performing lobbying activities on behalf of a client which is 
     determined by the Secretary of State to be a State sponsor of 
                               terrorism.
```
# L_2007333EN.01006801.xml

| 19.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 333/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 333/68

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1507/2007

of 18 December 2007

on the issuing of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of December 2007 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 536/2007 for poultrymeat

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in poultrymeat (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 536/2007 of 15 May 2007 opening and providing for the administration of a tariff quota for poultrymeat allocated to the United States of America (2), and in particular Article 5(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 536/2007 opened import tariff quotas for poultrymeat products. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 536/2007 opened import tariff quotas for poultrymeat products.

| (2) | The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of December 2007 for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2008 do not cover the total quantity available. The quantities for which applications have not been lodged should therefore be determined and these should be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of December 2007 for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2008 do not cover the total quantity available. The quantities for which applications have not been lodged should therefore be determined and these should be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities for which import licence applications under quota 09.4169 have not been lodged under Regulation (EC) No 536/2007, to be added to the subperiod 1 April to 30 June 2008, are 12 498 750 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 December 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 December 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 77. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 679/2006 (OJ L 119, 4.5.2006, p. 1). Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 will be replaced by Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1) as from 1 July 2008.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 128, 16.5.2007, p. 6.

2

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-4757

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EFFAT NAJARZADEH, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CR-99-138-A) Submitted: March 14, 2000 Decided: August 23, 2000 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Matthew Alan Wartel, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Orin S. Kerr, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Effat Najarzadeh appeals from her jury conviction of immigration fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1546(a) (West Supp. 1999). We affirm. Najarzadeh argues that the district court denied her the constitutional right to present a defense when it excluded her proffered evidence as to abuse she suffered in Iran and as to her experiences in Canada. She further contends that the court abused its discretion when it excluded her polygraph examination report. See United States v. Ruhe, 191 F.3d 376, 387 (4th Cir. 1999). We find that the court acted within its discretion in excluding the evidence. See Montana v. Egelhoff , 518 U.S. 37, 41 (1996); Taylor v. Illinois , 484 U.S. 400, 408 (1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### OVERTON v. HENDERSON

No. 131 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 699.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 June 1976. Appeal dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21




                          SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



SUBSIDIARY                                 JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION

Atari Games Corporation                    California
Fun House Games Inc.                       Delaware
K.K. Time Warner Interactive (Japan)       Japan
Lenc-Smith Inc.                            Delaware
Midway Games Inc.                          Delaware
Midway Home Entertainment Inc.             Delaware
Midway Interactive Inc.                    Delaware
Midway/Nintendo Inc. - 50% owned           Delaware
Qingdao Wei Te Family Playland Co., Ltd.   People's Republic of China
Tengen, Inc.                               California
WMS Finance Inc.                           Delaware
WMS Games Asia Limited                     Hong Kong
WMS Games (Europe) GmbH                    Germany
WMS Gaming Inc.                            Delaware
WMS Games Sales Corporation                Barbados
WMS Gaming Inc.                            Delaware
WMS Gaming (Canada) Inc.                   New Brunswick, Canada
WMS Gaming (Nevada) Inc.                   Nevada
Williams Electronic Games, Inc.            Delaware