alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007240EN.01000401.xml

| 12.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4861 — KESA/EMH)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 240/03)

On 4 September 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4861. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4861. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
#### GORE v. GEORGE J. BALL, INC.

No. 8 PC.

Case below: 10 N.C. App. 310.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 3 March 1971.
# L_2007301EN.01002801.xml

| 20.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 301/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 301/28

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1347/2007 of 16 November 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 1725/2003 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 8

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 300 of 17 November 2007
  )

The publication of this Regulation in the above mentioned Official Journal is annulled.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6472

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ROBERT ANTHONY WILLIAMS, a/k/a Black Mikey,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, 

District Judge. (4:07-cr-00144-RAJ-JEB-1)

Submitted: July 13, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Anthony Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Anthony Williams appeals the district court’s order 

granting his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2)(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Williams, No. 

4:07-cr-00144-RAJ-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 16, 2015). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5238 

To exempt the State of Utah from Federal programs in the areas of education, transportation, and Medicaid so that the State of Utah can 

undertake innovative methods to manage these government programs 

using Utah’s portion of Federal revenues for these programs, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2010 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah (for himself and Mr. CHAFFETZ) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor, and 

in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by 

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To exempt the State of Utah from Federal programs in 

the areas of education, transportation, and Medicaid so 

that the State of Utah can undertake innovative methods 

to manage these government programs using Utah’s portion of Federal revenues for these programs, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5238 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Utah Laboratory of 

3 Democracy Act of 2010’’. 

4 SEC. 2. UTAH ADMINISTRATION OF FEDERAL EDUCATION, 

5 TRANSPORTATION, AND MEDICAID PRO6 GRAMS. 

7 (a) TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATION.—The Secretary 

8 of Education, the Secretary of Transportation, and the 

9 Secretary of Health and Human Services shall seek to 

10 enter into an agreement with the State of Utah under 

11 which the State will assume all responsibility for the ad12 ministration within the State of Federal programs in the 

13 areas of education, transportation, and Medicaid. The 

14 State’s administration of the programs shall not be subject 

15 to oversight or regulation by the Secretaries so as to per16 mit the State to undertake and evaluate innovative meth17 ods to manage the programs. The agreement shall take 

18 effect on the first day of the first calendar year beginning 

19 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

20 (b) RETURN OF TAX REVENUES TO STATE.—If the 

21 agreement authorized by subsection (a) is entered into by 

22 the State of Utah, at the beginning of each calendar year 

23 thereafter, the Secretary of the Treasury shall transfer to 

24 the State of Utah an amount equal to that portion of the 

25 estimated tax revenues to be paid by citizens of Utah for 

26 that calendar year that would be returned to the State 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5238 IH

1 through Federal education, transportation, and Medicaid 

2 programs in the absence of the agreement. If the estimate 

3 for a calendar year results in an overpayment or under4 payment to the State, the Secretary of the Treasury shall 

5 adjust the payment for the next calendar year to recover 

6 the amount of the overpayment or correct the under7 payment. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
Exhibit 23.1

                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of our report dated March 16, 2002
and in previously filed Registration Statement Nos. 2-92383, 2-94286, 33 52059,
33-52061, 33-52353, 33-52687, 33-58756, 33-58758, 33-58760, 33-66394, 333-3871,
333-02743, 333-03871, 333-13817, 333-25141, 333-51433, 333-80007, 333-91687 and
333-91689.

Arthur Andersen LLP

New York, New York
March 28, 2001
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

As independent Chartered Accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our report dated 20 March 2002 with respect to the financial statements of
VISaer (UK) Limited for the year ended 31 December 2000 included in this Form
10-K for the year ended 31 December 2002 into the previously filed Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-99432, No. 333-32157 and No. 33-58134) of
Intelligent Systems Corporation.

Yours faithfully





HACKER YOUNG
MANCHESTER, ENGLAND

March 26, 2003
Exhibit 32.2


                Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer


The undersigned, Executive Vice President, Finance and Secretary, of Jaco
Electronics, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Quarterly
Report") accompanying this certification fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the dates and for the periods presented as required by such
report. The foregoing certification is based upon, among other things, my
responsibilities as principal financial officer of the Company, my own due
diligence and representations made by certain other members of the Company's
senior management.


Date:  May 16, 2005

                             /s/ Jeffrey D. Gash
                             --------------------------------------------------
                             Jeffrey D. Gash
                             Executive Vice President, Finance and Secretary
                             (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000052532
<NAME> MERCURY AIR GROUP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                       904
<INVENTORY>                                      1,761
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,018
<PP&E>                                          36,095
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  65,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,729
<BONDS>                                         21,255
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            54
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    65,085
<SALES>                                         86,616
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,660
<CGS>                                           80,011
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  102,842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   631
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   495
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,393
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,775
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,618
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,618
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Robinson GUZMAN, Appellant.

No. 03-3068.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) Nov. 1, 2004.

Decided April 21, 2005.

Rehearing Granted May 20, 2005.

George S. Leone, Gail Zweig, Office of United States Attorney, Newark, NJ, for United States of America.

Carlos Perez-Olivo, Kew Gardens, NY, for Appellant.

Before ALITO, BARRY, and FUENTES Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

After pleading guilty pursuant to a plea agreement, the defendant in this case was sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines. The sentencing occurred prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Defense counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw. Our review of the record has disclosed only one non-frivolous issue that could be raised on appeal, namely, that the District Court erred in sentencing the defendant under the erroneous belief that the Sentencing Guidelines were mandatory rather than advisory. Moreover, having determined that issues with respect to *Booker*are best determined by the District Court in the first instance, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with that opinion.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6236
FRANK JOHNSON, a Former Undercover Agent of the State Attorney's Office of Allegheny County, Maryland, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusN.T.F. TROOPER KECKLER, Individually and Official Capacity, State Police Officer/Barrack-B; N.T.F. TROOPER UPDEGRAFFEE, Individually and Official Capacity, State Police/Barrack-B;BARRY LEVINE, Individually and Official Capacity as a State Attorney for the State Attorney Office of Allegheny County, Maryland; KENNETH LONG, JR., Individually and Official Capacity as a State Attorney for Washington County, Maryland; OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND; OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY FOR ALLEGHENY COUNTY, MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA95-274-CCB) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 7, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.2 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frank Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Holdsworth Bowen, AssistantAttorney General, Betty Stemley Sconion, Assistant Attorney General, Pikesville, Maryland; Daniel Karp, Kevin Bock Karpinski, ALLEN, JOHNSON, ALEXANDER & KARP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Keckler , No. CA-95-274-CCB (D. Md. Jan. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00267

- CV

In re Elizabeth Weston

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Relator Elizabeth Weston has filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion

for stay of s p ecified obligations under May 9, 2022 discovery order. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.1,

52.10(a). We grant the motion and temporarily stay the trial court ’ s May 9, 2022 discovery

ruling and the production of discovery purs uant to that ruling pending further or d er of this Court.

See id . 52.10(b). The Court orders real part ies in interest to file r esponse s to the petition for writ

of mandamus on or before May 12, 2022

.

It is ordered on May 10, 2022

.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Annual Report of Unified Western Grocers, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended September 27, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard J. Martin, Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:    December 15, 2003



/s/    RICHARD J.
MARTINRichard J. MartinExecutive Vice President, Finance andAdministration and Chief Financial Officer(principal financial and accounting
officer)




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6571

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus REGINALD HENRY BOLT, a/k/a Reginald Holt Bolt; a/k/a Saquan, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CR-89-249, CA-97-393-2) Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 26, 1998 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald Henry Bolt, Appellant Pro Se. David Bernard Smith, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Bolt , Nos. CR-89-249; CA-97-393-2 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### JENNIE WARNER AND ALEX WARNER, RESPONDENTS, v. PUBLIC SERVICE CO-ORDINATED TRANSPORT, APPELLANT.

Submitted October 16, 1931

Decided January 20, 1932.

Before Justices Campbell, Lloyd and Bodine.

Por the appellant, *Henry H. Fryling (Arthur C. Gillette,*of counsel).

Por the respondent, *David T. Wilentz.*

Per Curiam.

The defendant appeals from -a judgment rendered against it in the Perth Amboy District Court. The reasons urged for reversal are the refusal of the court to grant a nonsuit or to enter a judgment in favor of the defendant because of insufficiency of evidence to establish negligence.

The plaintiff’s proofs tended to show that Mrs. Warner was a passenger in one of the defendant’s buses, and as the bus was proceeding at a high rate of speed it struck a bump, a window broke and the flying glass struck and injured her. It was for this injury that the action was brought. Prom the facts proved the jury could infer negligence in operation. *Shay*v. *Camden Horse Railway Co.,*66 *N. J. L.*334; *Hughes*v. *Atlantic Railroad Co.,*85 *Id.*212; *Scilimbracca*v. *Central Railroad Co.,*7 *N. J. Mis. R.*635; 146 *Atl. Rep.*665; *affirmed,*107 *N. J. L.*192.

Whether in the present case such inference should be drawn in the first instance, and whether, if so drawn, it was rebutted by the countervailing proofs, were questions for the jury and not for the court.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs
**TKP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 1 9
- 03 26 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LAWRENCE MATTHEW BRASDA ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a n extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including Dec em

ber 11 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file the State’s response .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 5 2020

11/05/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0326
#### COX v. DICK

No. 16 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 565.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 31 January 1977.
<PAGE>
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

233 South 13th Street, Suite 1600
Lincoln, NE 68508-2041

Two Central Park Plaza
Suite 1501
Omaha, NE 68102

                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Lincoln Telecommunications Company:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement 
on Forms S-3 and S-8 of Lincoln Telecommunications Company of our report, 
dated February 2, 1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of 
Lincoln Telecommunications Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 
and 1994, and related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' 
equity and cash flows and relating to the schedules to Form 10-K for each 
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1995, which 
reports appear in the December 31, 1995 annual report on Form 10-K of 
Lincoln Telecommunications Company.


                                             /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

March 26, 1996
Lincoln, Nebraska

<PAGE>
#### DOGGETT v. WELBORN

No. 82 PC.

Case below: 18 N.C. App. 105.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 12 July 1973.
(b) (6)

(b) (6)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) by OptimumBank
Holdings, Inc. (the Company), I, Richard L. Browdy, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                                           
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard L. Browdy                     
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Richard L. Browdy, Chief Financial Officer
#### Cleo FIELDS and the Fields Law Firm, L.L.C. v. James R. DUGAN, II and Gauthier, Downing, Labarre, Beiser and Dean, A Professional Law Firm.

No. 2003-C-2059.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 2003.

In re Dugan, James R. et al.; Gauthier Downing Labarre Beiser and Dean a Professional Law Corp.;—Defendant(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. N, No. 495,-132; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2002 CA 2107.

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., recused.

TRAYLOR, J., would grant the writ.