alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
E2 Solutions Travel Voucher

Itinerary

Voucher Expense Totals

Accounting Information

Remarks

Audit/Approver Information

Traveler Official Duty Station Voucher Id

RENE A ACOSTA Washington, DC 9748130(1)

Voucher Status Type of Travel Document Number

Closed Voucher Informational Meeting A009748130

Travel Purpose Voucher Type

To represent the US Labor Department. Final

Arrive Depart Time Location Car Hotel Mode Notes

2018-11-08 2018-11-08 03:00 PM Washington, DC NONE No CP

2018-11-08 2018-11-09 07:00 PM Indianapolis, IN NONE Yes CP Temporary Duty, LDG $125, M&IE $56

2018-11-09 2018-11-09 10:00 PM Washington, DC NONE No NONE

Notes: CP = Commercial Plane

Transport Lodging M&IE Car Rental Local Transport POV Misc Total

522.41 146.25 84.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.05 832.71

Accounting String CBA Amount TCC Amount Traveler Amount Total Amount

15.10 733.61 84.00 832.71

15.10 733.61 84.00 832.71

Date/Time Author Remark

2018-11-20 01:48 PM Traveler - NORRIS, RONETTA Voucher Remarks - Voucher ID: 9748130(1) - I hereby assign to the United States any

right I may have against any parties in connection with reimbursable transportation

charges described below, purchased under cash payment procedures (41CFR 101-

41.203-2). I certify that this voucher is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and

belief, and that payment or credit has not been received by me.

Date/Time Official Action

2018-11-26 10:14 AM DEBUSK, THOMAS N [DEBU6102] Approved [OSEC-IMMEDIATE]

Requested By: Signature: Date:

Authorized By: Signature: Date:

Generated from E2 Solutions on: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 10:21:29 CST Page 1 of 1

(b) (6)
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

|Pioneer | Drilling Company:
|------- | -----------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statements on Form S-8 of Pioneer Drilling Company (Reg. Nos. 333-48286 and 333-110569) of our reports dated May 24, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Pioneer Drilling Company and subsidiaries as of
March 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2006 and all related
financial statement schedules, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2006,
which reports appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pioneer Drilling Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006.

San Antonio, Texas

May 24, 2006
#### STATE v. SMITH

No. 21.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 729.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal under Rules 14A, 14D(1), 14D(2), 17A and 25 allowed 1 June 1976.
#### CAUBLE v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE

No. 124 PC.

No. 21 (Fall Term).

Case below: 45 N.C. App. 152.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 6 May 1980. Motion of plaintiff to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 6 May 1980.
#### Delores D. Stewart *v.*Leroy Stewart

*Delores D. Stewart,*pro se, in support of the petition.

Decided May 26, 1993

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 920 (AC 10940), is denied.
SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED

SUPERSEDED
#### OVERMAN v. SAUNDERS

No. 9 PC.

Case below: 4 N.C. App. 678.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 29 August 1969.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                      13,720,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,820,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 18,911,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,273,000
<PP&E>                                      36,776,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              22,000,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,558,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,899,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        91,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,805,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,558,000
<SALES>                                    146,831,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           146,831,000
<CGS>                                       95,259,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               95,259,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            44,975,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (73,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,670,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,735,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,935,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,935,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
        

</TABLE>
#### Edward J. Backenstos, Respondent, *v.*Celia A. Holmes, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

*Backenstos*v. *Holmes,*183 App. Div. 908, appeal dismissed.

(Argued September 30, 1918;

decided October 8, 1918.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 15, 1918, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover a balance alleged to be due upon a stock trading account.

The motion was made upon the grounds that the exceptions were frivolous and raised no question for review by the Court of Appeals.

*Joseph M. Gazzam*for motion.

*O. B. Thomas*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 210 (Tuesday, November 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 65912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21664]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel. Review of 
Research Program Projects (P01s).
    Date: November 22, 2005.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIAMS Institute, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy, 
Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Yan Z Wang, PhD, MD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal 
and Skin Diseases, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 820, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 594-4957, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d8afb9b6bfa1e998b5b9b1b4f6b6b1b0f6bfb7ae"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ceb9afa0a9b7ff8ea3afa7a2e0a0a7a6e0a9a1b8">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 20, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-21664 Filed 10-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
unaudited condensed  consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 1999 and the
unaudited  condensed  consolidated  statement of operations for the three months
ended  September  30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>


 <S>                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                          JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                            SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                          936,178
<SECURITIES>                                                    817,869
<RECEIVABLES>                                                26,260,475
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    592,204
<INVENTORY>                                                  33,229,723
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             62,635,592
<PP&E>                                                       11,630,840
<DEPRECIATION>                                                4,789,067
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               74,922,920
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        20,492,857
<BONDS>                                                      19,355,989
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                        406,572
<OTHER-SE>                                                   34,667,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 74,922,920
<SALES>                                                      42,017,363
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             42,017,363
<CGS>                                                        34,081,758
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                34,081,758
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              7,248,597
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              322,933
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 364,075
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    150,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             214,075
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    214,075
<EPS-BASIC>                                                      0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0.06


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 7 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 7 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 7 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 7 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 7 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 7 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03289-PKL Document 7 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 7 of 7
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

# ACTION:

Notice of a partially open meeting of the Board of Directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States. 

# TIME AND PLACE:

Friday, November 4, 2005 at 9 a.m. The meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.

# OPEN AGENDA ITEM:

Ex-Im Bank Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee for 2006.

# PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:

The meeting will be open to public participation for Item No. 1 only.

# FURTHER INFORMATION:

For further information, contact: Office of the Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571. (Tele. No. 202-565-3957.)

Howard A. Schweitzer,

General Counsel (Acting).

[FR Doc. 05-22114 Filed 11-2-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
#### STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. 59 PC.

Case below: 6 N.C. App. 14.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 7 October 1969.
NO. 07-03-0463-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TE XAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL B JUNE 30, 2004

______________________________ IN THE INTEREST OF L.L., T.Y. AND D.C., CHILD REN

_________________________________ FROM THE 140TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUB BOCK COUNTY; NO. 2002- 517,011; HONORAB LE JIM BOB DARNEL L, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ.

ORDER ON ABATEMENT AND REMAN D On October 23, 2003 , the appellate clerk received and filed a copy of a notice of appeal from appellant Twila Young. Thenotice sought to appeal from an order signed on August29, 2003 . Young did not p ay the ap pellatefiling fee. This court abated the appeal pending payment of the fili ng fee an d determi nation o f appell ate jurisd iction. Subsequently, the reporter’s record of a jury trial in August 2003, a c ler k’s record, and a motion by Young have bee n filed. Young h as not pa id eithe r the app ellate filing fee or the fee due for filin g of her m otion. We note in the clerk ’s record an order by the district-2-

court determining that she is indigent and a su bsequent order by t he ass ociate judge presidin g over the

August 2 003, jury trial determining that she is not in digent. Based on the record bef ore us at th is time, we determine that Young’s notice of appeal i s suffici ent to in voke app ellate ju risdicti on over h er appea l. Accordingly, pursuant to Young’s motion, this matter is abated and the cause is remanded to the tri al court. T EX . R. A PP . P. 2. Upon remand, the judge of the trial court is directed to immediately cause notice to be given of and to conduct a hearing to determine: (1) whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal ; (2) if appellant desires to prosec ute this appea l , then wh ether app ellant i s indige nt; (3) if appella nt is ind igent an d desire s to prosecutethis app eal, whe ther appe llant’s present co unsel should continue to represent her pursuant to the court’s prior order appointing counsel; and (4) what orders, if any, should be entered to assure the filing of appropriate notices and documentation to dismiss appella nt’s app eal if ap pellant does not desire to prosecut e this ap peal. The trial co urtis directed to: (1) conduct any necessary hearings; (2) make and file appropri ate findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendations, and caus e them to be included in a supplemental clerk’s record; (3) cause the hearing proceedings, if any, to be transcribed and included in a supplemental reporter’s record; (4) cause the records of the proceedings to be sent to this court; and (5) make and enter an y orders a ppropria te to clarify appellant’s status as indigent or non-indigent, and the status of appellant’s app ointed counsel.-3-

In the abse nce of a r equest fo r exte nsio n of time from the trial court, the supplemental cle rk’s record, supplemental reporter’s record, and any additio nal proceedin g records, including any orde rs, findi ngs, conc lusionsand reco mmendatio ns, are to be sent so as to b e receive d by the c lerk of th is court n ot later t han July 28, 2004
.

Per Curiam
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

KAREN TATIANA SIDWELL , Appellant

,

v.

JAMES EARL SIDWELL , Appellee

.

No

. 4D2 2

- 2267

[ July 20, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nine teent h Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Brett M. Waronicki

, Judge ; L.T. Case No. 432021DR000383

.
Matthew S. Nugent and Adam M. Zborowski of The Law Offices of Nugent Zborowski, North Palm Beach, for appellant

.
Karen O’Brien Steger of Steger Law, Stuart

, for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

G ROSS , G ERBER and L EVINE , J J ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Exhibit 11
                   The Advest Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
                                      
                 Computation of Net Income Per Common Share

                                   For the years ended September 30,
                        -----------------------------------------------------
                                                              Assuming
                                (Primary)                   Full dilution
In thousands, except    -----------------------------------------------------
per share amounts       1997     1996      1995        1997     1996     1995
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                  <C>      <C>        <C>        <C>      <C>       <C>
Net income           $14,932  $11,260    $6,387     $14,932  $11,260   $6,387

Interest expense
  on debentures, net      --       --        --         249      814    1,001
                     --------------------------------------------------------
Net income applicable to
  common stock       $14,932  $11,260    $6,387     $15,181  $12,074   $7,388
                     ========================================================

Average number of common
  shares outstanding during
  the period           8,512    8,426     8,501       8,512    8,426    8,501

Additional shares assuming:
  Exercise of stock
   options               366      322       234         416      329      270
  Conversion of
   debentures             --       --        --         466    1,515    1,527
                     --------------------------------------------------------
Average number of common
  shares outstanding   8,878    8,748     8,735       9,394   10,270   10,298
                     ========================================================

Net income per share $  1.68   $ 1.29   $  0.73     $  1.62  $  1.18  $  0.72
                     ========================================================

                                     -72-

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. BILLY JAMES POTTS.

(Filed 15 December, 1965.)

1. Criminal Law § 106—

The court is not required to define “reasonable doubt” in its charge to the jury.

2. Criminal Law § 148—

A defendant who has obtained a *certiorari*must perfect his appeal and file a proper case on appeal within the time required or the proceedings will be dismissed.

This case was tried at the July Criminal Session 1964 of MeCK-LENBURG. No appeal was perfected pursuant to the appeal entries. We allowed *certiorari*22 September 1965.

The defendant was convicted of breaking and entering and the larceny of property of the value of less than $200.00, and of the larceny of six automobiles of the value of more than $200.00 each. The cases were consolidated for trial.

When we allowed *certiorari*we set the case for argument at the call of the Fourteenth and Seventeenth Districts. Cases to be argued *118at the call of those districts were required, under our Rules, to be docketed in this Court on or before Tuesday, 2 November 1965. No case, in compliance with our Rules, has been docketed.

*Attorney General Bruton,*Assf. *Attorney General James F. Bullock for the State.*

*Charles V. Bell for defendant.*

Per CuRiam.

Defendant, through his counsel, instead of preparing a case on appeal in accord with the Rules of this Court, merely brings forward the charge of the court below.

Defendant undertakes to assign as error the failure of the court below to charge the jury as to the meaning of “reasonable doubt.” Defendant made no request that the court below define the phrase “reasonable doubt.” Therefore, if we had a valid case on appeal and an exception to the charge in this respect, it would be feckless. *S. v. Browder,*252 N.C. 35, 112 S.E. 2d 728.

The defendant having failed to perfect his appeal within the time required, and having failed to file a proper case on appeal within the time required, on motion of the Attorney General that the judgments of the lower court be affirmed and the appeal dismissed, as provided by Rules 5, 17 and 19, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 254 N.C. 786, *et seq.,*the judgments entered below are affirmed and the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.