Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 8, 2005 / Notices 67739 

undeveloped buffer area. The Campo 

Indian Reservation, which consists of 

15,580 acres in southeastern San Diego 

County, lies just north of the United 

States/Mexico border and 

approximately 45 miles inland from the 

Pacific Ocean. 

The Campo Band previously entered 

into a lease agreement with Muht-Hei, 

Inc. (MHI), pursuant to which MHI 

would lease a portion of the Campo 

Indian Reservation for the purpose of 

constructing and operating a solid waste 

landfill, recycling facility, and 

composting facility. The Campo Band 

originally authorized MHI in 1989 to 

enter into a sublease with MidAmerican Waste Systems, Inc. (MAWS) 

for the development of the solid waste 

landfill facility. The Campo Band 

requested the BIA approve the lease and 

sublease for the proposed project. An 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 

was prepared by BIA, in accordance 

with the requirements of the National 

Environmental Policy Act, to evaluate 

the environmental impacts of the 

proposed project prior to determining 

whether the proposed lease related to 

the project should be approved. A Final 

EIS (FEIS) was released on November 

24, 1992. The BIA issued a Record of 

Decision (ROD) with conditions on 

April 27, 1993, and approved the lease 

between the Campo Band and MHI and 

sublease between MHI and MAWS for 

the proposed solid waste landfill. The 

Campo Environmental Protection 

Agency (CEPA) issued a final Authority 

to Construct Permit (ATC) to MHI and 

MAWS on April 5, 1994, to construct 

the proposed solid waste landfill, 

subject to the conditions of the ROD and 

ATC. 

Subsequently, MAWS failed to 

proceed with construction of the project 

and MHI was found in default of the 

sublease terms. Since that time, MHI has 

solicited interest from other solid waste 

landfill developers. In early 2003, MHI 

began negotiations with BLT 

Enterprises, Inc. (BLT), Oxnard, 

California, on the terms of a sublease to 

develop the solid waste landfill 

described in the FEIS. Those 

negotiations were successfully 

concluded and on December 12, 2004, 

the Campo Band authorized MHI to 

enter into a sublease with BLT. 

The BIA has decided to prepare a 

SEIS to address changes in the proposed 

action, relevant information that has 

become available, or circumstances that 

have changed over the years since the 

FEIS was issued. Areas of concern 

addressed in the FEIS included land 

resources, water resources, air quality, 

living resources, cultural resources, 

socio-economics, transportation, land 

use, resource use patterns, noise and 

other values. The FEIS included five 

alternatives to the proposed action, as 

follows: (1) Alternative Site One, (2) 

Alternative Site Two, (3) Reduced Waste 

Stream at the Proposed Site, (4) 

Reduced Area of Disturbance at the 

Proposed Site, and (5) No Action. The 

SEIS will incorporate the proposed 

project description from the FEIS by 

reference, and will discuss aspects of 

the project that have changed since the 

FEIS was released in 1992, any changes 

in environmental impacts associated 

with those changes, and changes to 

alternatives. 

Public Comment Availability 

Comments, including names and 

addresses of respondents, will be 

available for public review at the BIA 

address shown in the ADDRESSES

section, during business hours, 8 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except holidays. Individual respondents 

may request confidentiality. If you wish 

us to withhold your name and/or 

address from public review or from 

disclosure under the Freedom of 

Information Act, you must state this 

prominently at the beginning of your 

written comment. Such requests will be 

honored to the extent allowed by the 

law. We will not, however, consider 

anonymous comments. All submissions 

from organizations or businesses, and 

from individuals identifying themselves 

as representatives or officials of 

organizations or businesses, will be 

made available for public inspection in 

their entirety. 

Authority 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 1503.1, 1506.6 

and 1508.22 of the Council on 

Environmental Quality Regulations (40 

CFR Parts 1500 through 1508) 

implementing the procedural 

requirements of the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as 

amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), 

Department of the Interior Manual (516 

DM 1–6), and is in the exercise of 

authority delegated to the Principal 

Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian 

Affairs by 209 DM 8.l. 

Dated: October 24, 2005. 

Michael D. Olsen, 

Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—

Indian Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 05–22173 Filed 11–7–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–W7–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[ID–300–1020–PH] 

Notice of Public Meeting, Idaho Falls 

District Resource Advisory Council 

Meeting 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of public meeting. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Federal Land Policy and Management 

Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. 

Department of the Interior, Bureau of 

Land Management (BLM) Idaho Falls 

District Resource Advisory Council 

(RAC), will meet as indicated below. 

DATES: The meeting will be held 

November 29–30, 2005 at the Hampton 

Inn, 2500 Channing Way, Idaho Falls, 

Idaho 83404. The meeting will start at 

1 p.m. November 29, with an orientation 

session for new members. This first day 

will be information only, and no 

decisions will be made. The second day, 

November 30, will be for the full 

Advisory Council, and the public 

comment period as the first agenda 

item, starting at 8 a.m. The meeting will 

adjourn at or before 3 p.m. At this 

meeting, the Advisory Council will set 

its agenda for the coming year, schedule 

meetings, and discuss current issues 

before the BLM Idaho Falls District. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15- 

member Council advises the Secretary 

of the Interior, through the Bureau of 

Land Management, on a variety of 

planning and management issues 

associated with public land 

management in the BLM Idaho Falls 

District (IFD), which covers eastern 

Idaho. At this meeting, topics we plan 

to discuss include: 

• Orientation for new members. 

• A discussion of recreational 

upgrades to the Blackfoot Reservoir 

campground and the need to set fees. 

RAC members will be asked for their 

input as to an appropriate range of fees 

for the site, in preparation for a broader 

public outreach campaign in December 

and January. 

• Updates on Idaho’s Sage Grouse 

Conservation strategy, if completed and 

released for public review. 

• A field trip to the Cress Creek Trail, 

weather permitting. If remaining 

indoors, the discussion will also include 

a brief update on the Upper Snake Field 

Office South Fork Activity Plan 

revision. 

• Updates on the latest litigation for 

BLM, and other current issues as 

appropriate. 

67740 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 8, 2005 / Notices 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

2 Vice Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun, 

Commissioner Charlotte R. Lane, and Commissioner 

Daniel R. Pearson dissenting. 

• The RAC will set an annual agenda. 

• Other items of interest raised by the 

Council. 

Transportation for the field trip will 

be provided for RAC members. Members 

of the public wishing to accompany the 

RAC on the field trip must furnish their 

own transportation. 

All meetings are open to the public. 

The public may present written 

comments to the Council. Each formal 

Council meeting will also have time 

allocated for hearing public comments. 

Depending on the number of persons 

wishing to comment and time available, 

the time for individual oral comments 

may be limited. Individuals who plan to 

attend and need special assistance, such 

as sign language interpretation, tour 

transportation or other reasonable 

accommodations, should contact the 

BLM as provided below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Howell, RAC Coordinator, Idaho 

Falls District, 1405 Hollipark Dr., Idaho 

Falls, ID 83401. Telephone (208) 524–

7559. E-mail: David_Howell@blm.gov. 

Dated: November 2, 2005. 

David Howell, 

RAC Coordinator, Public Affairs Specialist. 

[FR Doc. 05–22206 Filed 11–7–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–GG–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigations Nos. 731–TA–298 and 299 

(Second Review); Investigations Nos. 701–

TA–267 and 268 and 731–TA–304 and 305 

(Second Review)] 

Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware From 

China and Taiwan; Top-of-the-Stove 

Stainless Steel Cooking Ware From 

Korea and Taiwan 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year reviews, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (Commission) determines, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the 

Act), that revocation of the antidumping 

duty orders on porcelain-on-steel 

cooking ware from China and Taiwan 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. The 

Commission also determines that 

revocation of the antidumping and 

countervailing duty orders on top-ofthe-stove stainless steel cooking ware 

from Korea would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time,2 and that revocation of the 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

orders on top-of-the-stove stainless steel 

cooking ware from Taiwan would not be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. 

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

reviews on March 1, 2005 (70 FR 9974) 

and determined on June 6, 2005 that it 

would conduct expedited reviews (70 

FR 35708, June 21, 2005). 

The Commission transmitted its 

determinations in these reviews to the 

Secretary of Commerce on October 27, 

2005. The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 3808 

(October 2005), entitled Porcelain-onSteel Cooking Ware From China and 

Taiwan, and Top-of-the-Stove Stainless 

Steel Cooking Ware From Korea and 

Taiwan (Investigation Nos. 731–TA–298 

and 299 (Second Review) and 

Investigation Nos. 701–TA–267 and 268 

and 731–TA–304 and 305 (Second 

Review)). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: November 1, 2005. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 05–22158 Filed 11–7–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comments Requested 

Editorial Note: This document was 

inadvertently omitted from the issue of 

Thursday, November 3, 2005. 

ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information 

Collection Under Review: Application 

for Registration (DEA Form 225); 

Application for Registration Renewal 

(DEA Form 225a); Affidavit for Chain 

Renewal (DEA Form 225b). 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), Drug 

Enforcement Administration (DEA) has 

submitted the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection is 

published to obtain comments from the 

public and affected agencies. This 

proposed information collection was 

previously published in the Federal 

Register, Volume 70, Number 154, page 

46887 on August 11, 2005, allowing for 

a 60 day comment period. 

The purpose of this notice is to allow 

for an additional 30 days for public 

comment until December 8, 2005. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

regarding the items contained in this 

notice, especially the estimated public 

burden and associated response time, 

should be directed to the Office of 

Management and Budget, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention Department of Justice Desk 

Officer, Washington, DC 20503. 

Additionally, comments may be 

submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 

395–5806. Written comments and 

suggestions from the public and affected 

agencies concerning the proposed 

collection of information are 

encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of a currently approved 

collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: 

Application for registration (DEA Form 

225); Application for registration 

renewal (DEA Form 225a); Affidavit for 

chain renewal (DEA Form 225B). 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: