alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

T.J., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE,

Jacksonville, FL, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0781

Issued: July 6, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On May 11, 2023 appellant filed an appeal from a January 18, 2022 merit decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 23-0781.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act.1 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance 

of OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the January 18, 2022 decision was July 17, 2022. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until May 11, 2023, more than 180 days after the

January 18, 2022 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 23-0781 is 

untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not 

explained his failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the 

date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.”
2

establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP 

within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed 

as No. 23-0781, must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-0781 is dismissed.

Issued: July 6, 2023

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id.

at § 501.6(d).
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Earle M. Jorgensen Company (EMJ) for the period ended September 29, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Maurice S. Nelson, Jr., as
Chief Executive Officer of EMJ, and I, William S. Johnson, as Chief Financial Officer of EMJ, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of EMJ as of and for the periods covered in this
Report.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2004                                       
|                                                              
|/s/    MAURICE S. NELSON, JR.                                 
|Maurice S. Nelson, Jr.                                        
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
|                                                              
|/s/    WILLIAM S.
JOHNSON                                     
|William S. Johnson                                            
|Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary         



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Earle M. Jorgensen Company and will be retained by Earle M. Jorgensen Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request. The foregoing certification is accompanying the Form 10-Q solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of title 18 United States Code and is not being filed as a part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
#### THE STATE OF NEVADA, Appellant, v. VICTOR ROWLAND HAVAS, Respondent.

No. 8309

September 30, 1975

540 P.2d 1060

*Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *George E. Holt,*District Attorney, and *H. Leon Simon,*Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Appellant.

*Jeffrey D. Sobel,*Las Vegas, for Respondent.

OPINION

By the Court,

Mowbray, J.:

Victor Rowland Havas, the respondent, was charged with rape. After a preliminary hearing, he was held to answer the charge in the district court. Thereafter, he petitioned that court for a writ of habeas corpus, which was granted. The State has appealed from the order granting the writ. The sole issue presented for our consideration is whether the record taken before the magistrate establishes “probable cause to believe that an offense [rape] has been committed and that the defendant has committed it.” NRS 171.206. State v. Fuchs, 78 Nev. 63, 368 P.2d 869 (1962); Ervin v. Leypoldt, 76 Nev. 297, *612352 P.2d 718 (1960); Raggio v. Bryan, 76 Nev. 1, 348 P.2d 156 (1960); Ex parte Liotard, 47 Nev. 169, 217 P. 960 (1923); In re Kelly, 28 Nev. 491, 83 P. 223 (1905).

After reading the transcript of the proceedings before the magistrate who saw and heard the witness, we conclude, as did the magistrate, that the record shows there was sufficient legal evidence presented at the preliminary hearing establishing probable cause to believe that a public offense, rape, had been committed and that the defendant had committed it. We, therefore, reverse the order of the district judge granting habeas, and we order the defendant to answer in the district court.

Batjer and Zenoff, JJ., concur.

Gunderson, C. J.,

concurring:

I can agree with the majority that, drawing all possible inferences in favor of the State, and rationalizing inconsistencies between the asserted victim’s story and other evidence, it is possible to find “probable cause” in the sense this court heretofore has recognized.

Weak as the case against respondent may be, still I have concluded one cannot declare the magistrate’s determination erroneous, absent a redefinition of “probable cause.”

Thompson, J.,

dissenting:

The State appeals from an order of the district court granting a petition for a writ of habeas corpus presented by Victor Havas. Havas was charged with having committed the crime of forcible rape (NRS 200.363). Following a preliminary examination, he was ordered to stand trial in the district court. The instant proceeding for habeas relief then was filed, and the district court released Havas from custody since, in its view, no evidence of force was introduced to sustain the charge.

Force is a necessary ingredient of the offense of forcible rape, State v. Lung, 21 Nev. 209, 28 P. 235 (1891). I find nothing in the record before us to suggest that the accused used force to cause the complainant to submit to sexual intercourse. I would affirm the district court’s order granting habeas relief.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Te xas

October 15, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00534

- CV

EP ENERGY COMPANY, Appellant

v.

STOREY MINERALS, LTD, Maltsberger/Storey Ranch, LLC, and Rene Barrientos, Ltd., Appellee s

From the 81st Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18

- 05

- 0 0083

- CVL The Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

EP Energy Corporation has filed a notice stating that it is in bankruptcy. The notice complies with Rule 8 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Accordingly, this appeal and all time periods are stayed from the date the bankruptcy petition was filed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 8.2.

It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal is ABATED. For administrative purposes, the appeal will be treated as a closed case, unless and until it is reinstated in accordance with Rule 8.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of October, 2019

.

___________________________________ LUZ ESTRADA

, Chief Deputy Clerk
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

James Wayne Walsh, Appellant

No. 06

- 15

- 00059

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 196th District Court of Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 28,919 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief

Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, James Wayne Walsh, has adequately indicated his inability to

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 10 , 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 217 (Thursday, November 10, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 68448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22373]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-7995-5]


Forty-Third Street Bay Drum Superfund Site; Notice of Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA) has entered into an Agreement for Recovery of 
Past Cost (Agreement) at the Forty-Third Street Bay Drum Superfund Site 
(Site) located in Tampa, Hillsborough County, Florida, with Kardol, 
Inc. and FMM Drum, Inc. EPA will consider public comments on the 
Agreement until December 12, 2005. EPA may withdraw from or modify the 
Agreement should such comments disclose facts or considerations which 
indicate the Agreement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. 
Copies of the Agreement are available from: Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Superfund Enforcement & 
Information Management Branch, Waste Management Division, 61 Forsyth 
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303, (404) 562-8887, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e5a78491868d80898a97cbb584908984a5809584cb828a93"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="46042732252e232a2934681627332a270623362768212930">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Written comments may be submitted to Ms. Batchelor at the above 
address within 30 days of the date of publication.

    Dated: October 24, 2005.
Rosalind H. Brown,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch.
[FR Doc. 05-22373 Filed 11-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
The Honorable William G. Cambridge, Chief Judge, United States District

1

Court for the District of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-1894

___________

John Jozaitis, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Company, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: July 1, 1997

Filed: July 7, 1997

___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

John Jozaitis appeals the district court’s judgment for defendant Fort Dearborn 1

Life Insurance Company following a bench trial in his action brought under ERISA, 29

U.S.C. § 1132. Having carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record, we

conclude that the district court did not err and that an extended opinion would have no

precedential value. We decline to address the issues Jozaitis did not preserve below.

See McKeel v. City of Pine Bluff, 73 F.3d 207, 211 (8th Cir. 1996). As to Jozaitis’s
-2-

allegations regarding his counsel’s representation below, we note that a civil litigant has

no constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel. See Glick v. Henderson, 855

F.2d 536, 541 (8th Cir. 1988). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 23.2  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (Nos. 333-65113, 333-84848, 333-96717, 333-110553 and 333-152296) on
Forms S-8 of Cache, Inc. of our report dated March 10, 2008, relating
to the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement
schedule of Cache, Inc. and subsidiaries, appearing in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Cache, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 29,
2007.  /s/ Mahoney Cohen and Company, CPA, P.C.  New York, New York March 12, 2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

DR. JUDY WOOD on behalf of the

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff/Realtor,

VS.

APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.;

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL

CORP., BOEING; NuSTATS; COMPUTER

AIDED ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.,

DATASOURCE, INC.; GEOSTAATS, INC.;

GILSANZ MURRAY STEFICEK LLP;

HUGHES ASSOCIATES, INC.; AJMAL

ABBASI; EDUARDO KAUSEL;

DAVID PARKS; DAVID SHARP; DANIELE

VENEZANO; JOSEF VAN DYCK; KASPAR

WILLIAM; ROLF JENSEN & ASSOCIATES,

INC; ROSENWASSER/GROSSMAN CONSULTING

ENGINEERS, P.C.; SIMPSON GUMPERTZ &

HEGER, INC.; S.K. GHOSH ASSOCIATES,

INC.; SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL,

LLP; TENG & ASSOCIATES, INC.;

UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES, INC.;

WISS, JANNEY, ELSTNER ASSOCIATES,

INC.; AMERICAN AIRLINES; SILVERSTEIN

PROPERTIES; and UNITED AIRLINES,

Defendants.

Case No. 07-CV-3314

RULE 7.1 STATEMENT

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Defendant Teng &

Associates, Inc. ("Teng"), by and through the undersigned and its attorneys, hereby certifies that

Teng has no parent corporation and no corporation that owns more than 10% of its stock.

Dated: Chicago, Illinois

February It , 2008

1

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 45 Filed 02/22/2008 Page 1 of 2
CONWAY & MROWIEC

By:

Edward B. Keidan

Conway & Mrowiec

20 South Clark Street

Suite 1000

Chicago, Illinois 60603

(312) 658-1100 Tel.

(312) 658-1201 Fax

2

Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 45 Filed 02/22/2008 Page 2 of 2
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

A.H., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, 

Bolivar, MO, Employer

_________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0953

Issued: October 30, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Alan J. Shapiro, Esq., for the appellant1

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On July 10, 2023 appellant through counsel, filed a timely appeal from a June 14, 2023,

merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the 

Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 23-0953.

In a letter dated and received October 12, 2023, counsel requested that the appeal be 

dismissed.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that counsel’s request for the 

dismissal of the appeal should be granted.2 Accordingly, 

1

In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for 

legal or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 20 

C.F.R. § 501.9(e). No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board. Id.

An attorney or representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, 

subject to fine or imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of 

fees to a representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation.

2 The Board’s decisions and orders are final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance. 20 

C.F.R. § 501.6(d).
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the dismissal of the appeal 

is granted. The appeal docketed as No. 23-0953 is dismissed.

Issued: October 30, 2023

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                  5
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          23,716
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,952
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,401
<INVENTORY>                                     61,807
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,042
<PP&E>                                          31,859
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,498
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 196,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,294
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,586
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   196,585
<SALES>                                        196,971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               196,971
<CGS>                                          149,006
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,007
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   609
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,655
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,149
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,556
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,776
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,776
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.87





</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of the Company for the six months ended
June 30, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000054291
<NAME> KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             113
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      300
<ALLOWANCES>                                         6
<INVENTORY>                                        507
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,066
<PP&E>                                           1,160
<DEPRECIATION>                                      45
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              565
<BONDS>                                            963
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               20
<PREFERRED>                                          2
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                         135
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,016
<SALES>                                          1,212
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,212
<CGS>                                            1,006
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,006
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   106
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  55
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     44
<INCOME-TAX>                                        15
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 30
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        30
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>