alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jagroop SINGH, Petitioner, v. *901Alberto R. GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-74715.

Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 2005.**

Decided April 12, 2005.

Jagroop Singh, Sacramento, CA, Pro se.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA; and Richard M. Evans, Esq., Paul Fiorino, Esq., DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto R. Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Jagroop Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings based on changed circumstances. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. *Ordonez v. INS,*345 F.3d 777, 782 (9th Cir.2003). We grant the petition for review.

The BIA abused its discretion in denying Singh’s motion to reopen because his *902evidence is sufficient to establish prima facie eligibility for asylum and withholding of removal. *See Malty v. Ashcroft,*381 F.3d 942, 947 (9th Cir.2004) (facts in support of motion to reopen must be accepted as true unless inherently unbelievable); *Hernandez-Ortiz v. INS,*777 F.2d 509, 513 (9th Cir.1985) (prima facie eligibility established when evidence, if true, would satisfy requirements for relief).

According to Singh, the police twice arrested and beat him, and threatened his life, because he and his family assisted a pro-Khalistan political group. His brother was killed by police for his political activity, and his father, mother and wife have been arrested and mistreated. The police are again interested in his whereabouts and threaten to “not spare” him if he returns.

Taking these facts as true, there is no question Singh demonstrates a “reasonable likelihood” of establishing past persecution, a well-founded fear of future persecution, and a clear probability of future persecution, on account of political opinion. *See Ordonez,*345 F.3d at 785 (petitioner need not demonstrate conclusively his eligibility for relief to prevail in a motion to reopen). Accordingly, we grant the petition for review and remand to the BIA with instructions to reopen proceedings. *See Malty,*381 F.3d at 948.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED with instructions.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
The Honorable Michael James Davis, United States District Judge for the

1

District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable John

M. Mason, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-3892

___________

Stiletto Carlucci Luciano, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Walter Sass, Lt., * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: February 2, 1998

Filed: February 6, 1998

___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit

Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Stiletto Carlucci Luciano appeals from the district court’s adverse grant of

1

summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having reviewed the record and

the submissions on appeal, we conclude that the judgment of the district court was
-2-

correct and that an extended opinion is not warranted. Accordingly, the judgment is

affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES W. VANDIVNER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 33 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of July, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5605 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5605

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 47 East Fayette Street in Uniontown, Pennsylvania, as the ``George 
                       C. Marshall Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GEORGE C. MARSHALL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 47 East Fayette Street in Uniontown, Pennsylvania, shall be 
known and designated as the ``George C. Marshall Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``George C. 
Marshall Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 30 
      (legislative day September 29), 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5605

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 47 East Fayette Street in Uniontown, Pennsylvania, as the ``George 
                       C. Marshall Post Office''.
```
# L_2007289EN.01001301.xml

| 7.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 289/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 289/13

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 30 October 2007

appointing a German member of the European Economic and Social Committee

(2007/715/EC, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 259 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 167 thereof,

Having regard to the nomination submitted by the German government,

After receiving the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | By Decision 2006/524/EC, Euratom appointing Czech, German, Estonian, Spanish, French, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Luxembourg, Hungarian, Maltese, Austrian, Slovenian and Slovak members of the European Economic and Social Committee (1), the Council appointed the German members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2006 to 20 September 2010. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By Decision 2006/524/EC, Euratom appointing Czech, German, Estonian, Spanish, French, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Luxembourg, Hungarian, Maltese, Austrian, Slovenian and Slovak members of the European Economic and Social Committee (1), the Council appointed the German members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2006 to 20 September 2010.

| (2) | A German member’s seat on that Committee has fallen vacant following the resignation of Mr Heiko STEFFENS, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A German member’s seat on that Committee has fallen vacant following the resignation of Mr Heiko STEFFENS,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Gerd BILLEN, Vorstand des Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverbands, is hereby appointed a member of the European Economic and Social Committee in place of Mr Heiko STEFFENS for the remainder of the latter’s term of office, which ends on 20 September 2010.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 30 October 2007.

For the Council

The President

F. NUNES CORREIA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 207, 28.7.2006, p. 30. Decision amended by Decision 2007/622/EC, Euratom (OJ L 253, 28.9.2007, p. 39).

1

---
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Perry J. Grace, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of ZiLOG, Inc.;
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | [Intentionally omitted]
|-- | -----------------------



|4. | [Intentionally omitted]
|-- | -----------------------



|5. | [Intentionally omitted]:
|-- | ------------------------



Date: August 5, 2005



/S/    PERRY J. GRACEPERRY J. GRACEChief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to ZiLOG, Inc. and will be retained by ZiLOG, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1011

DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. TRENTON TOWN COUNCIL; MAYOR OF TRENTON; TOWN CLERK; BOARD OF ELECTIONS; WILL BROCK, as Chairman, and/or their successors , Respondents

.

No. 18
- 1013

DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. TOWN OF TRENTON; DARLENE SPIVEY, as Mayor; CHARLES C. JONES, Town Council Members; ROBERT HORVATH, Town Council Member; GLEN SPIVEY, as Town Clerk; WILL BROCK, In his official capacity, chairman of the Board of Elections, and/or their Successors , Respondents

.2 No. 18
- 1014

DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. EASTERN CAROLINA HEART INSTITUTE; DONNA EDWARDS, and/or their successors; COTTINA GODDARD, and/or their successors; MARQUITA HALL, and/or their successors , Respondents

.

No. 18
- 1015

DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. TRENTON TOWN COUNCIL; DARLENE SPIVEY, as Mayor; CHARLES C. JONES, and/or their successors; ROBERT W. HORVATH, and/or their successors; GLENN SPIVEY, as Town Clerk, and/or th eir successors; JONES COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, and/or their successors; WILL H. BROCK, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Board of Elections, and/or their successors , Defendants

.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Greenville

. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. ( 4:17

- mc
- 00002

- H; 4:17

- mc
- 00003

- H; 4:17

- mc
- 00004

- H; 4:17

- mc
- 00005

- H )3 Submitted : April 24, 2018 Decided: May 31 , 2018

Bef ore MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Daniel Johnson Willis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.4 PER CURIAM:
Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court’s order denying him leave to file civil complaints for failure to comply with a prefiling injunction . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court

. Willis v. Trenton Town Council , Nos. 4:17

- mc
- 00002

- H; 4:17

- mc
- 00003

- H; 4:17

- mc
- 00004

- H; 4:17

- mc
- 00005

- H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 2017)

. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We deny Willis’s motion and supplemental motion titled

“ Appeal

- Extra Ordinary Delay Complaint for En Banc Hearing Declaratory and Injunctive Relieve Reverse and Remand.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argume nt would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Opinion filed July 22 , 2010



## In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________



### No. 11

- 10

- 00 14 1

- CR

__________

MARVIN RAY HAILE
, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 259 t h District Court

Jones County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No . CR023913

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Marvin Ray Haile pleaded guilty on December 17, 2008, to the offense of terroristic

threat. The trial court sentenced him to confinement for a term of sixty days in jail. We dismiss

the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

The trial court imposed the sentence in open court on December 17 , 2008. Appellant

filed his pro se notice of appeal in the trial court on June 8, 2010, over seventeen months after

the date the sentence was imposed. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.2 requires that a notice of appeal must be

filed with in thirty days after the sentence is imp osed in open court or within ninety days after the2

sentence is imposed in open court if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial. 1

Accordingly, t he notice of appeal is not timely. 2 Furthermore, a m otion for extension of time to

file the notice o f appeal was not filed in compliance with T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.3. Absent a timely

notice of appeal or compliance with Rule 26.3, this court lacks jurisdiction to entertain an appeal.

Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 209

- 10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d

519, 522

- 24 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State , 860 S.W.2d 108, 109

- 10 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1993); Shute v. State , 744 S.W.2d 96, 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988).

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. All pending motions in this appeal are

overruled

.

PER CURIAM

July 22 , 2010

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Strange, J.

1 A motion for new trial must be filed within thirty days after the trial court imposes sentence in open court. T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 21.4.

2 Appellant states in his docketing statement that he also filed notices of appeal on Feb ruary 5, 2010 ; April 2, 2010 ; and May 11, 2010. These purported notices of appeal are also untimely filed.
```

Exhibit 21

                                             SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY**Subsidiary                     Business Line       Jurisdiction    % Ownership            Owner**
-------------------------------------- ------------------------ -------------- --------------- -----------------------
Merchants and Farmers Bank             Commercial Bank          Mississippi         100        First M & F
                                                                                               Corporation

M & F Financial Services, Inc.         Finance Company          Mississippi         100        Merchants and Farmers
                                       (inactive)                                              Bank

First M & F Insurance Company, Inc.    Life Insurance Company   Mississippi         100        Merchants and Farmers
                                                                                               Bank
M & F Insurance Agency, Inc.           Insurance Agency         Mississippi         100        Merchants and Farmers
                                                                                               Bank

M & F Insurance Group, Inc.            Insurance Agency         Mississippi         100        Merchants and Farmers
                                                                                               Bank

Merchants and Farmers Bank             Real Estate              Mississippi         100        Merchants and Farmers
Securities Corporation                                                                         Bank

M & F Business Credit, Inc.            Asset-Based Lending      Mississippi         100        Merchants and Farmers
                                                                                               Bank

Merchants Financial Services Group,    Accounts Receivable      Mississippi          51        Merchants and Farmers
LLC                                    Factoring                                               Bank

MS Statewide Title, LLC                Title Insurance Agency   Mississippi          55        Merchants and Farmers
                                                                                               Bank
```
**Exhibit 31.1 Section 302 Certifications**I, Michael Sheriff, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the X-Change Corporation,     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis quarterly report;     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterlyreport based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date: August 13, 2007/s/ Michael Sheriff
#### HARRY D. HILL, PROSECUTOR, v. CITY OF WILDWOOD ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Argued December 23, 1931

Decided December 24, 1931.

Before Justices Teenchakd, Daly and Dongbs.

Bor the prosecutor, *Augustine B. Bepetio.*

Bor the defendants, *Clarence L.*Cole, *Jonathan Hand*and *George A. Bourgeois.*

*75Pee Cubiam.

Application is made for a writ of *certiorari*to review a certain resolution of the commissioners of the city of Wild-wood, adopted December 16th, 1931, providing for the sale of certain beach front park bonds of the city of Wildwood, and, likewise, for permission to take additional depositions to be used on said application for a writ of *certiorari.*

We have considered the merits of these applications and conclude that both should be denied.

The applications are therefore denied, with costs.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of K-tel International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis Ward, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                     Thereport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 
| By                                                         | /s/ DENNIS WARD |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
| Dennis Ward                                                |
| Chief  Financial Officer (principal financial officer) and |
| Director                                                   |
| February 13, 2004                                          |

 

----