alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,121
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,121
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          172,311
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       749,950
<OTHER-SE>                                   (921,140)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,121
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,724
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,724)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       972
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,696)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,696)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
全国劳资关系法(THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT, NLRA)保障劳工拥有组织

和集体与其雇主进行谈判的权利,拥有参加其它受保护集体行动的权利。全国劳资关系

法保护劳工免受来自雇主或工会特定类型不正当行为的侵害。本宣传材料针对全国劳工

关系法赋予您的权利,和雇主与工会应履行的义务向您做简要介绍。如果您对适用您所

在的具体工作岗位的具体权利具有任何疑问,请通过以下联系信息联系国家劳资关系委

员会(National Labor Relations Board)。国家劳资关系委员会是根据全国劳资关系法

负责调查和解决相关控诉的联邦机构。

根据全国劳资关系法,您拥有

以下权利:

• 组织成立工会,以与您的雇主就您

的工资、工作时间、和与雇佣相关

的其他条件条款进行谈判。

• 组织,参加或支持工会。

• 通过劳工代表与雇主进行集体谈

判,有权选择与您的雇主就您的工

资、权益、工作时间,和其他工作

条件签订合同。

• 与由一起工作的同事或工会就工作

与组织条件条款进行讨论。

• 与一个或更多同事,通过向您的雇

主或政府机构直接提起与工作相

关的控诉,或通过其他诸多方式途

劳工权利

根据全国劳资关系法

根据全国劳资关系法,如果某工

会或代表您与您的雇主进行谈判

的工会有以下行为系违法:

• 威胁您,除非您支持工会,您将丢

失工作。

• 因为您曾经批评过工会官员或者因

为您不是工会成员,拒绝处理您的

控诉。

• 在对来自职业介绍所的人员进行工

作推荐时,采用或具有歧视性标准

或程序。

• 因为您的与工会相关活动,导致或

试图导致雇主对您产生歧视。

• 因为您参加或支持工会,采取其他

不利您的针对性行为。

根据全国劳资关系法,您雇主的

以下行为系违法:

• 阻止您在非工作时间,比如上班时间

前或上班时间后,或休息时间寻求工

会帮助,参加工会活动;或者在非工

作时间,非工作区域,比如停车场或

休息间,分发工会文件资料。

• 就您得到的工会帮助或您参加的工

会活动对您进行任何形式的盘问,

阻止您参加这些活动。

• 因为您参加或支持工会,或者因为

您参加了统一的互助或保护行动,

或者因为您选择不参与任何类似行

动,您被解雇、降级,或调换岗

位,或减少工作时间,或调换值班

时间,或与此相反,您受到了对自
径,并寻求工会组织的帮助,一起

采取行动改善您的工作条件。

• 根据罢工或纠察的方式与目的进行

罢工和纠察。

• 选择拒绝进行以上任何活动,包括

参加或退出工会组织。

严禁违法行为。严禁违法行为的发生。

如果您认为您的权利,或者其他人的权利受

到了侵犯,您应及时联系全国劳工关系局

(NLRB)以保护您的权利,一般应在违法行

为发生后 6 个月内进行联系。您可以就可能

的违法行为进行查询,而不需要通知您的雇

主或其他人获悉此项查询。任何人均可以书

写提交控诉,并且可以不需要被违法行为直

接影响的劳工书写提交。全国劳工关系局可

以要求发生违法行为的雇主重新雇佣被解雇

的工人,并且向工人支付因解雇损失的薪资

和收益,也可以要求雇主或工会停止违犯法

律的行为。劳工可以从最近的全国劳工关系

局地方办公室寻求帮助,可以通过全国劳工

关系局的网站获得这些办公室的信息,

网址:www.nlrb.gov.

如果您或您的同事选择了工会代表您们进行集体劳资

谈判,您的雇主和工会应被要求真诚地进行谈判,付

出真正的努力以达成一个书面的、对双方均具有约束

力的协议,约定您的工作条件条款。工会应被要求公

平地代表您进行谈判,认真落实协议。

您也可以拨打免费电话联系国家劳资关系

委员会 (NLRB): 1-844-762-NLRB (6572). 

我們可提供語言協助。希望与 NLRB 代表

通话的听障人士应发送电子邮件至

relay.service@nlrb.gov。 NLRB 代表将

通过电子邮件向请求者发送有关如何安

排中继服务呼叫时间的说明。

*国家劳资关系法对大多数私人雇主均具有约束力。

政府公共部门的雇主、农业和家庭劳动者,独立经营

的承包商、由父母或配偶雇佣的工人,由铁路劳动法

管辖的航空和铁路承运部门的工人和管理者(尽管曾

经因拒绝违犯全国劳资关系法而受到歧视的管理者可

以被涉及)等,不属全国劳资关系法的管辖范围。

身不利的对待,或被威胁将被采取

以上任何形式的对待。

• 如果劳工选择工会来代表自己,

威胁要撤销您们的工作岗位。

• 承诺或保证给与升职、加薪,或其

他利益以阻碍或鼓励工会的帮助。

• 阻止您在工作场所佩戴具有工会标

志的帽子、饰扣、T 恤和胸针,

但特殊情况除外。

• 监视或拍摄和平的工会活动或

集会,或试图进行此类行为。

此为政府公告,任何人不得污损。 Technical Revision Date: 05/02/22

扫描了解更多
#### STATE v. GREEN

No. 65 PC.

Case below: 17 N.C. App. 595.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 June 1973.
#### CONSTRUCTION CO. v. COAN

No. 94 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 731.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 December 1976.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7674

RONALD FLOYD JACKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL MOORE; WILLIAM R. DAVIS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-97-1116-6-23AK) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 2, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Floyd Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Eric Petersen,William Ansel Collins, Jr., SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days withinwhich to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The district court entered its order on October 8, 1997; Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on November 14, 1997, which is beyond the thirty-day appeal period. Appellant’s failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leavesthis court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant’s appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
U.S DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

EMPLOYMENT ST.A'NDARDS ADMIN1ST:RAT10N 

Office of Workers' Compensation Program;; 

August 26, 1977 No. 32 

NOTICE TO INSURANCE CARRIERS, SELF-INSURED EMPLOYERS 

THE LONGSHOREMEN'S AND HARBOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION ACT, 

AS EXTENDED, AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS 

Subject: Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation 

Act Procedures: Final rules governing referral 

and hearing of disputed claims and application 

for approval of fees for legal services rendered 

to successful claimants 

Attached is a copy of recently published amended and added 

rules of the Department of Labor governing the administration 

of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, 

33 u.s.c. 901 et al., as amended by Public Law 92-576, 

86 Stat. 1251. These rules modify existing regulations 

relating to the referral and hearing of disputed claims and 

the application for approval of fees for legal services 

rendered to successful claimants. Proposed regulations were 

published in the Federal Register on March 15, 1977, and 

comments received thereafter. These changes become effective 

thirty days after the date of publication in the Federal 

Register. 

The highlights of the revisions of 20 CFR 702 are discussed 

here only briefly. However, careful attention should be 

given to the regulations in their entirety. 

Section 702.132 has been amended to provide for the payment 

of fees only to those persons specifically referred to in 

this section, whether such fees shall constitute a lien on 

compensation due and payable or are assessable against the 

employer. Fee applications must be served on other parties, 

within specified time limits, supported by a complete and 

detailed statement of the extent and character of the necessary 

work performed, with particularity as to the professional 

status of the person performing the work. 

Prior to the referral of a claim to the Office of Administrative 

Law Judges pursuant to section 702.317 the parties must 

prepare a pre-hearing statement on a form furnished by the 

Deputy Commissioner and return it to him/her within 21 days. 

All evidence the parties intend to submit at the hearing will 
- 2 -

be furnished to the Chief Administrative Law Judge along with 

the pre-hearing statements via a transmittal letter from the 

Deputy Commissioner. 

The time for notice of a hearing in accordance with section 

702.335 will be not less than thirty days in advance thereof. 

Section 702.337 mandates that continuances will be granted 

only under limited circumstances as in the case of extreme 

hardship or because of previously scheduled judicial proceedings. Requests for continuances must be received at least 

ten days before the hearing is scheduled. 

Post hearing briefs will be permitted but are subject to 

limitations set forth in section 702.343. 

~~01.~ 

Associate Director for 

Longshore and Harbor 

Workers' Compensation 

Attachment
#### STATE v. WILLIAMS.

Case below: 1 N.C. App. 127.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 14 June 1968. Case is set for argument first week of Fall Term 1968.
FIRST
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





This First Amendment to the
Employment Agreement is effective the first day of October, 1998 (the “First
Amendment”), by and between MICROS SYSTEMS, INC., a Maryland corporation, with
offices located at 12000 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, Maryland 20705
(hereinafter referred to as the "Company"), and Thomas L. Patz, whose address is
7421 Bucks Haven Lane, Highland, Maryland 20777 (hereinafter referred to as the
“Executive”).





WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company
entered into an Employment Agreement dated May 28, 1997 (the “Agreement”);
and





WHEREAS, the parties hereto would like
to amend the Agreement pursuant to this First Amendment in an effort both: (i)
to reflect the rapid growth experienced by the Company, and the current status
of the Company and the Executive relative to other similarly positioned
entities; and (ii) to solidify the long-term management structure of the
Company.





NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the
Executive, for good and valuable consideration, and pursuant to the terms,
conditions, and covenants contained herein, hereby agree as
follows:





1.  Section
3 of the Agreement, captioned “Term”, shall be deleted in its entirety and the
following new language inserted in lieu thereof:





“Term.  The
term of this Agreement shall commence upon October 1, 1998, and shall be for a
period of three years.  The term of this Agreement shall be
automatically renewed on October 1 of each year for successive three-year
renewal terms thereafter, unless written notice is given by either party to the
other party, pursuant to which a party states that it elects not to renew
automatically the Agreement for an additional three-year renewal
term.  Such written notice of non-renewal must be provided to the
other party not less than 120 days prior to the automatic renewal
date.  In the event a notice of non-renewal is tendered in accordance
with the terms hereof, the Agreement shall continue until the end of the then
existing three-year term, unless otherwise terminated as provided
hereinbelow.”





2.  All
other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have
executed this First Amendment as of the dates indicated below, the effective
date of this First Amendment being the first day of October, 1998.





COMPANY:ATTEST:
                                                
                                                MICROS
      SYSTEMS, INC.By:
                                                
                                                
                                                (SEAL)A.L.
      GiannopoulosPresident
      and Chief
                                                  Executive
      Officer[Corporate
      Seal]EXECUTIVE:WITNESS:
                                                
                                                THOMAS
      L. PATZ
EXHIBIT 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

Solely for the purposes of
complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Jilco Industries, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the quarter ended April 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 25, 2007



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Martha Kretzmer                                        
|Martha Kretzmer                                            
|Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
#### AUGUSTA H. CANTWELL, RESPONDENT, v. GEORGE DELANEY AND SADIE DELANEY, PROSECUTORS.

Submitted October 16, 1931

Decided May 18, 1932.

Before Justices Tbenchaed and Donges.

For the prosecutors, *William F. Delaney.*

For the respondent, *Simon Englander.*

Pee Cueiam.

Augusta H. Cantwell filed her petition with the workmen’s compensation bureau and was awarded compensation against George Delaney and Sadie Delaney, who now prosecute this writ on *certiorari*to review the affirmation of such determination by the Court of Common Pleas of Essex County.

The facts found by the commissioner and the Court of Common Pleas are in effect as follows:

Mrs. Delaney was about to be confined in the birth of a child; Mrs. Cantwell was engaged as a practical nurse to at*784tend the mother and child and to do washing, cooking and general housework for a period of three weeks and such further time as her services might be required. She became a member of the prosecutor’s household and performed the duties assigned to her. She was injured by accident in the performance of such duties, which fact is not seriously disputed.

The prosecutors urge that respondent was not an employe within the meaning of subdivision (c) of paragraph 23 of the Workmen’s Compensation act *(Pamph. L.*1911, *p.*144, as amended *Pamph. L.*1919, *p.*211); that her service was casual; and that, having been injured during the period of three weeks alleged to be the limit of her employment, there can be no recovery by her.

The prosecutors raise four points: (1) petitioner was an independent contractor; (2) petitioner’s employment was casual; (3) the award was excessive; (4) the Common Pleas Court failed to hear, review and determine the case *de novo.*

As to the employment of petitioner, we conclude that the compensation bureau and the Court of Common Pleas rightly held that it was within the compensation act, and that it was not casual. The proofs reasonably show that it was for at least three weeks and such further indefinite period as her services might be required. The work was of such a character as to constitute her a regular employe in the household of prosecutors. *Stillman*v. *Judges of Court of Common Pleas of Essex*County, 6 *N. J. Mis. R.*6; 139 *Atl. Rep.*705.

Our reading of the testimony persuades us that the amount awarded as compensation for temporary and permanent disability was reasonably supported by the testimony and should not be disturbed.

The contention that the court of Common Pleas did not consider the evidence and reach an independent conclusion there is not supported by the determination and rule for judgment of the Common Pleas. The contrary appears to be the fact.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, with costs.
# (

----/-----

# -\

## -;

j

JEFF L ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE BOB PEMBERTON, JUSTICE MELISSA OOODWIN, JUSTICE SCOTT K. FIELD, JUSTICE CINDY OLSON BOURLAND, JUSTICE Ms. Mary E_ Allen General Delivery 823 Congress Suite 150 Austin, TX 78701 RE: Court ofAppeals Number: Trial Court CaseNumber: Style: MaryE. Allen 

# COURT OF APPEALS THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS P_O_ BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547 www.txcourts.gov/3rdcoaaspx (512) 463-1733

January 23, 2015

03-14-00670-CV C-1-CV-14-007235 JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK

v. Wells Branch SelfStorage Dear Ms. MaryE_ Allen: The Clerk ofthis Court filed appellant's notice ofappeal on Wednesday, October22, 2014. The clerk's and reporter's records were due inthis Court on Monday, December 08, 2014 and December 15, 2014 respectively, and are overdue. Appellant has been found to be not indigent. Notice was received from the district clerk's office ofTravis County, Texas on January 23, 2015, indicating appellanthas neither paid, nor made arrangements for payment, for the clerk'srecord. Accordingly, the clerk's record will notbe timely filed. Appellant is requested to make arrangements for the record and submit a status report regarding this appeal. A response regarding this matter is requested by this Court on or before Mondav, February 02, 2015_ Failure to do so mayresult in the dismissal ofthis appeal for want ofprosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Ifappellanthas not already done so, he is instructed to make a written request to the court reporter and make arrangements for payment ofthe record. Ifappellant does not wish to pursuethis appeal, please file a motion to dismiss. Verytruly yours, JEFFREYD. KYLE, CLERK Amy Strother, Deputy Clerk

cc: Ms. Emily Newell

/ . 

# -"/'
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 2 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 3 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 4 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 5 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 6 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 7 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 8 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 9 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 10 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 11 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 12 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 13 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 14 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 15 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 16 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 17 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 18 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 19 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 20 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 102 Filed 07/07/2008 Page 21 of 21
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of K-tel International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kimmy Lockwood, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                     The report fullycomplies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.                     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| By                          |   /s/  KIMMY LOCKWOOD |   |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
| Kimmy Lockwood              |
| Principal Financial Officer |
| May 14, 2007                |

 

----
Document

EXHIBIT 4.1


DESCRIPTION OF REGISTERED SECURITIES


As of December 31, 2021, Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) has one class of securities, Class B stock, registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act).  The Class B Stock is registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act.


DESCRIPTION OF CLASS B STOCK


The following description of the Bank’s Class B Stock and the relevant provisions of the Bank’s amended bylaws and amended capital plan are summaries and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the Bank’s organization certificate, amended bylaws and the Bank’s Capital Plan.


General


The Class B Stock has a par value of $100 per share and is issued, redeemed, repurchased, and transferred only at its stated par value. Each issued and outstanding share of Class B Stock represents an undivided proportionate ownership interest in the retained earnings, paid-in surplus, undivided profits, and equity reserves of the Bank. The Bank may issue Class B Stock only in book-entry form.


Ownership and Transfer of Class B Stock


Class B Stock may be owned only by Bank members or, if required by the Bank in accordance with the Bank’s Capital Plan, by a former member or a member’s successor, and certain other nonmembers who have acquired advances from a former member. At the request of a member, the Bank may transfer a member’s Excess Stock (which is defined in the Capital Plan as stock in excess of a member’s minimum stock requirement) to another Bank member or to an institution that has been approved for membership. All transfers must be made at par value. No other transfers are permitted.


Voting Rights


The members are entitled to vote only in connection with the election of directors in accordance with the Federal Home Loan Bank Act (FHLB Act) and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency) regulations. Each member entitled to vote in a director election may cast for each open directorship in that member’s state in that election, and in any nonmember independent director election, a number of votes equal to the number of shares that it was required to hold as of the prior December 31 (the record date), except that no member’s votes may exceed the average of the number of shares required to be held by all members located in that state as of the record date. Excess Stock is not counted for purposes of voting or for determining the voting limit. A former member that was a member as of the record date is entitled to vote in the election of directors in accordance with the FHLB Act and Finance Agency regulations.


Dividends


All Class B Stock will share in any dividends without preference. Dividends may be paid in the form of cash or Class B Stock. Dividends will be paid to the holders of record during the time period for which the dividend is declared and will be computed on the amount of time during the relevant time period that the shares were outstanding. Dividends will be payable only from the current net earnings or previously retained earnings of the Bank, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Case 7:07-cv-03216-LMS     Document 4      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 1 of 1