alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER <F1>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-23-1997
<CASH>                                           3,929
<SECURITIES>                                    75,048
<RECEIVABLES>                                   95,364
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,072
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               215,427
<PP&E>                                         398,820
<DEPRECIATION>                                 233,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 493,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          105,859
<BONDS>                                          1,360
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,600
<OTHER-SE>                                     382,224
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   493,043
<SALES>                                        143,710
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               143,710
<CGS>                                           79,267
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  125,958
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  17
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,066
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,894
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,172
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,172
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.81
<FN>
<F1>   3 ACCOUNTING PERIODS
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 22.1
                     SUBSIDIARIES OF INTER-TEL, INCORPORATED

         Listed below are all the  subsidiaries of Inter-Tel,  Incorporated,  as
well as the  jurisdiction  under the laws of which each was  organized,  and the
percentage  of  the  outstanding  voting  stock  of  each  owned  by  Inter-Tel,
Incorporated.
                                               Percentage        State or
                                                of Voting      Jurisdiction
Name                                           Stock Owned    of Organization
----                                           -----------    ---------------

Inter-Tel Integrated Systems, Inc.                 100%           Arizona

Inter-Tel Technologies, Inc. (formerly
  Inter-Tel Communications, Inc.)                  100%           Arizona

Inter-Tel Leasing, Inc.                            100%           Arizona

Inter-Tel Midwest, Inc.                            100%           Delaware

Inter-Tel Incorporated-New Jersey                  100%           Delaware

Inter-Tel NetSolutions, Inc.                       100%           Texas

Inter-Tel DataCom, Inc.                            100%           Delaware

Southwest Telephone Systems, Inc.                  100%           New Mexico

American Telcom Corp. of Georgia, Inc.             100%           Georgia

Access West, Inc.                                  100%           Delaware

Inter-Tel Integrated Systems (UK), Ltd.            100%           United Kingdom

Inter-Tel Japan, Inc.                              100%           Japan

Florida Telephone Systems, Inc.                    100%           Florida

NTL Corporation dba ComNet of Ohio                 100%           Ohio
** **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |  /s/                Wilbert G. Holliman          |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Wilbert                  G. Holliman                  |
|   | Title:                  Chief Executive Officer       |
|   | Furniture                  Brands International, Inc. |
|   | May                  11, 2007                         |
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board ofDirectors 

Pioneer Drilling Company: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-160416) and on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-48286, 333-110569, 333-153180 and333-160415) of Pioneer Drilling Company of our reports dated February 16, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Pioneer Drilling Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the nine months ended December 31, 2007, and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Pioneer Drilling Company. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

San Antonio, Texas 

February 16, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

          - 12 CFR Part 615 
          - RIN 3052-AC22 

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of effective date. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Farm Credit Administration (FCA) published a final rule under part 615 on August 31, 2005 (70 FR 51586). This final rule amends our liquidity reserve requirements for the banks of the Farm Credit System to ensure the banks have adequate liquidity. The final rule increases the minimum liquidity reserve requirement to 90 days, increases the eligible investment limit to 35 percent of total outstanding loans and requires Farm Credit banks to develop and maintain liquidity contingency plans. These amended requirements will improve the ability of Farm Credit banks to supply agricultural credit in all economic situations. In accordance with 12 U.S.C. 2252, the effective date of the final rule is 30 days from the date of publication in the                         **Federal Register**                         during which either or both Houses of Congress are in session. Based on the records of the sessions of Congress, the effective date of the regulation is October 24, 2005.                     

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

The regulation amending 12 CFR part 615 published on August 31, 2005 (70 FR 51586) is effective October 24, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Wade Wynn, Financial Analyst, Office of Regulatory Policy, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA 22102-5090, (703) 883-4498, TTY (703) 883-4434; or 

Laura McFarland, Senior Attorney, Office of General Counsel, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA 22102-5090, (703) 883-4020, TTY (703) 883-4020. 

Authority:12 U.S.C. 2252(a)(9) and (10)

Dated: October 26, 2005. 

Jeanette C. Brinkley, 

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board. 

[FR Doc. 05-21629 Filed 10-28-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
# C_2007182EN.01000701.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4783 — Bain Capital/Bavaria Yachtbau)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 182/05)

On 31 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4783. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4783. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
#### FERDIE SIEVERS, as an Individual, LAKE TAHOE LAND CO., INC., HENRY KROEGER and KROEGER PROPERTIES, INC., Appellants, v. COUNTY TREASURER OF DOUGLAS COUNTY, STATE OF NEVADA, and the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, DOUGLAS COUNTY, STATE OF NEVADA, and HARRY A. WINKLEMAN, COUNTY ASSESSOR, DOUGLAS COUNTY, STATE OF NEVADA, Respondents.

No. 10829

November 3, 1980

618 P.2d 1221

*Carl F. Martillaro,*Carson City, for Appellants.

*Richard H. Bryan,*Attorney General, Carson City; *Michael Rowe,*District Attorney, and *J. Thomas Susich,*Deputy District Attorney, Douglas County, for Respondents.

1

The Governor designated the Honorable Joseph O. McDaniel, Judge of the Fourth Judicial District Court, to sit in the place of The Honorable Gordon Thompson, Justice. Nev. Const, art. 6, § 4.

*820OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

This is an appeal from a judgment upholding Douglas County’s refusal to accept payment for redemption of certain real estate. Appellant Sievers tendered only delinquent taxes, penalties, and interest, refusing to tender delinquent assessments on the property, substantially all of which accrued after the delinquent tax notice was delivered to Sievers pursuant to NRS 361.565.

Here, the trial court determined that both the unclean hands doctrine and the doctrine of laches precluded any relief to Sie-vers. Sievers failed to assign error to these conclusions, either of which was dispositive of the entire action. *Cf.*Agricultural Ins. Co. v. Biltz, 57 Nev. 370, 64 P.2d 1042 (1937) (unclean hands); Daly v. Lahontan Mines Co., 39 Nev. 14, 158 P. 285 (1915) (laches).

Even had we found error in the Douglas County Treasurer’s refusal to accept Sievers’ partial tender, it is well established that this court will affirm the holding of the lower court if it is supported by any of the theories presented. *See*Rae v. All American Life & Cas. Co., 95 Nev. 920, 605 P.2d 196 (1979); Kraemer v. Kraemer, 79 Nev. 287, 382 P.2d 394 (1963); Foster v. Lewis, 78 Nev. 330, 372 P.2d 679 (1962).

We affirm the judgment of the lower court.

Mowbray, C. J., and Gunderson, Manoukian, and Bat-jer, JJ., and McDaniel, D. J.,1 concur.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1150 GLEASON INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, INC. and PRECISION PRODUCTS, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v. CENTRAL PURCHASING, LLC.,

Defendant-Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in case no. 06-00089, Senior Judge Richard W. Goldberg.

ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of the United States' motion for a 43-day extension of time, until May 22, 2009, to file its brief, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT 

## APR 10 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly FILED Clerk U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT Matthew P. Jaffe, Esq. Louis S. Mastriani, Esq. APR 1 0 2009 Courtney E. Sheehan, Esq. JAN riUMMLY CLERK Date

cc:
s8
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Irwin Financial Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the Report), I,
William I. Miller, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Dated: July 30, 2004
    
    /s/ William I. MillerWilliam I. MillerChairman and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
      23.2







**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**








Implant
      Sciences Corporation


Wakefield,
      MA





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-3 (No.’s 333-109677, 333-111434, 333-117366, 333-124058, 333-127167 ) and Form
      S-8 (No. 333-111117) of Implant Sciences Corporation of our report dated October
      10, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which is
      incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.








/s/
      BDO Seidman, LLP


Boston,
      MA





October
      11, 2006
#### JAMES W. LAWSON, P.C., Plaintiff, v. NEVADA POWER COMPANY, Defendant.

Civ. A. No. 90-0749-GHR.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

July 12, 1990.

See also 739 F.Supp. 23.

Thomas M. Buchanan, Cathy L. Burgess, Bishop, Cook, Purcell & Reynolds, Washington, D.C., for defendant.

James W. Lawson, Kensington, Md., pro se.

ORDER

REVERCOMB, District Judge.

This matter is before the court pursuant to the defendant’s motion for reconsidera*10tion of this Court’s order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss count II of the plaintiff’s complaint. The defendant contends that count II does not represent a claim for relief based on quantum meruit because it is based on a speculative assessment of past and future savings to Nevada Power rather than upon the reasonable value of services rendered. What the defendant ignores is that the reasonable value of services rendered can in fact be based on past and future savings. There is no ground on which to suggest that value billing is any less a reasonable means than hourly billing in determining value of services rendered. Whether the plaintiff’s figures are reasonable or speculative in relying upon a quantum meruit theory based on the concept of value billing is more appropriately a fact issue which requires resolution based on evidence adduced at trial. Moreover, the plaintiff contends that the alleged savings enjoyed by the defendant are in fact a result of actual services rendered.

Accordingly, it hereby is

ORDERED that the defendant’s motion for reconsideration be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         319671
<NAME>                        GLOBAL GOLD CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               1,432
<SECURITIES>                                         180,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     181,432
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       181,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                210,458
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4,348
<OTHER-SE>                                           (33,374)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         181,432
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     (109,200)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   49
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (109,151)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         675
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (109,826)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (109,826)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.033)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.30.1

AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE

UNIFIED GROCERS, INC.

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN II

Unified Grocers, Inc. (the Company) hereby amends the above-named plan (the Plan), effective as of January 1, 2011, as follows:

1. Section 3.4(d) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

(d) The additional Contribution Credit (as such term is defined in the Retirement Plan) that would have been
credited under the Retirement Plan if the Participant had not elected to defer a portion of his or her compensation under this Plan, which shall be credited as of the earlier of: (i) the date the Participant ceases to be an Employee; or
(ii) the last day of the Plan Year to which such benefit relates. The compensation taken into account to determine this benefit shall be subject to the limitations contained in Section 401(a)(17) and Section 415 of the Code.

2. Section 3.6(d) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding a new sentence at the end to read as follows:

Notwithstanding any provision in the Plan to the contrary, the Annual Excess Amount described in
Section 3.4(d) that is credited to a Participants Annual Account on or after December 31, 2010, shall be credited or debited in accordance with the rules of this Section 3.6 from the earlier of: (i) the date the Participant
ceases to be an Employee; or (ii) the
January 1stimmediately following the Plan Year to
which such benefit relates.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, by its duly authorized officers, have executed this
Amendment effective as of January 1, 2011.



|               |  |  |  |                                                                      |  |                        
|-------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|               |  |  |  | UNIFIED GROCERS, INC                                                
|               |  |  | 
|Dated:
9/09/10 |  |  |  | By:                                                                  |  | /s/ Robert M. Ling, Jr.
|               |  |  |  | Robert M. Ling, Jr. Executive Vice President & General Counsel      
|               |  |  | 
|Dated:
9/09/10 |  |  |  | By:                                                                  |  | /s/ Richard J. Martin  
|               |  |  |  | Richard J. Martin Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 4TH DISTRICT COURT OF RUSK COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 8th 

day of April, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined; 

and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Mark Victor Dheil, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-14-00201-CR

Trial Court No. CR14-089

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Mark Victor Dheil, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 10th day of June, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk