alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael Sheriff, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on form 10-QSB of The X-Change
Corporation,

         2. Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any
untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary
to make the  statements  made,  in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
exchange act rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 for the registrant and have:

        a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  proceduresto  ensure that
        material   information   relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
        consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others  within those
        entities,  particularly  during the period in which this report is being
        prepared;

        b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
        and  procedures  as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
        this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

        c)  presented  in  this  quarterly  report  our  conclusions  about  the
        effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and  procedures  based on our
        evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee  of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the
equivalent functions):

        a) all  significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
control  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls.

         6. The registrant's  other certifying  officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant  changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of my most recent  evaluation,  including any  corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 21, 2006



/s/ Michael Sheriff
Michael Sheriff, President, Chief
Executive Officer, and Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of BSD Medical Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB Form for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Hyrum A. Mead, President (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.




/s/ Hyrum A. Mead
-----------------
Hyrum A. Mead
President (Principal Executive Officer)
December 1, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No.33-91296, Form S-8 No. 333-56125 and Form S-8 No. 333-39700)
pertaining to the Bull Run Corporation 1994 Long Term Incentive Plan, the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-91298) pertaining to the Bull Run
Corporation Non-Employee Directors' 1994 Stock Option Plan, and the Registration
Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-84833) pertaining to the issuance of shares of BR
Holding, Inc. of our reports dated September 28, 2000 (except for Notes 2, 4 and
10, as to which the date is July 27, 2001), with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Bull Run Corporation included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K/A-1) of Bull Run Corporation for the year ended June 30, 2000,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                            /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina
July 27, 2001
#### SEVLESRUO HOLDING CORPORATION ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. FIREMEN’S INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Argued October 15, 1931

Decided February 11, 1932.

Before Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justice Case.

For the plaintiff Sevlesruo Holding Corporation, *Joseph T. Lieblich.*

For the defendants Firemen’s Insurance Company and Chicago Fire and Marine Insurance Company, *'William A. Wachenfeld.*

For the defendant American Equitable Assurance Company, *Arthur T. Vanderbilt.*

Per Curiam.

This suit is to recover for fire loss-on three buildings, a six-family dwelling, a milk shed, and a cowbarn, and their contents. The principal defense was that the fire was set by or by procurement of the owner, and several other defenses, somewhat technical in character, are ancillary to that claim. The jury found for the plaintiffs except on the second count for the contents of the milk shed, as to which no assessment of damages was returned, and plaintiff holding corporation has a rule to show cause why a new trial as to damages only should not be granted on this count. Defendants insurers hold a rule to show cause why the verdict in *243favor of the holding company on other counts should not be set aside as against the weight of evidence, reserving their exceptions in other respects. Several mortgagees were interested as plaintiffs by virtue of mortgagee clauses made part of the policies, but most of them have been paid and the rule is not pressed as to any others. The question therefore is between the companies and the insured.

A careful examination of the case satisfies us beyond reasonable doubt that the verdict is against the weight of evidence. It is needless to go into details touching the two fires a month apart, both of which were clearly incendiary in character and in effect admitted so to have been. The evidence shows elaborate preparation and adequate motive. It is intimated for the plaintiffs that the incendiarism was that of some enemy, and mention was made in the testimony of alleged threatening letters; but not one such letter was produced and the testimony about them, if it can be called testimony, was so vague and indefinite as to be without evidential value. We conclude that defendants amply proved a case of fraudulent burning to get the insurance, and that the verdict to the contrary was clearly against the weight of evidence. There must be a new trial, therefore, on the counts on which damages were assessed; and as to the plaintiff’s rule there will be a new trial at large on that also.

There are motions relating to the recasting of the *postea,*&c., but as the foregoing disposition of the meritorious question has the practical effect of nullifying the whole *postea*as the basis for any judgment, the questions arising on these other motions become academic and require no decision. They will therefore be dismissed.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Strategic Internet
Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"). I, Abbas Salih, Chief Financial Officer of the company,
certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





|Date: | May 15, 2007 |  | /s/ Abbas Salih           
|----- | ------------ |  | --------------------------
|      |              |  | Abbas Salih, CFO, Director

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Kevin JACKSON, Defendant.

No. 89-166 CR (2).

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D.

Jan. 11, 1991.

*873Richard Poehling, Asst. U.S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for the U.S.

Jim Delworth, Federal Public Defender, for defendant.

ORDER

FILIPPINE, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s post-trial “motion under Title 18 section 3568 to be granted credit for time on bond as in custody time.” At the onset, the Court notes that 18 U.S.C. § 3568 was repealed and applies only to offenses committed prior to November 1, 1987.1 Furthermore, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has clearly stated that under § 3568 a prisoner was only entitled to credit for time actually spent in custody and not for time on bond. *Villaume v. United States,*804 F.2d 498 (8th Cir.1986). The award of credit for prior custody is now controlled by 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b). That plaintiff is not entitled to the relief he seeks is even clearer under this section which provides for credit for time “spent in official detention.”

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant’s motion is DENIED.

1

. Defendant committed the charged offense on June 10, 1989, and his motion pertains to the period from August 11, 1989, until January 29, 1990.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF WMS INDUSTRIES INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Subsidiary                                      Jurisdiction of Incorporation
----------                                      -----------------------------

<S>                                             <C>
WMS Gaming Inc.                                 Delaware
WMS Gaming (Canada) Ltd.                        New Brunswick, Canada
Lenc-Smith Inc.                                 Delaware
Williams Electronics Games, Inc.                Delaware
WMS Finance Inc.                                Delaware
WMS Gaming International, S.L.                  Spain
WMS Gaming Australia PTY Ltd.                   Australia
WMS Gaming Africa (Pty) Ltd.                    South Africa
</TABLE>

All subsidiaries are 100% owned by WMS Industries Inc. or its subsidiaries.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6409

TAHRIM SUPREME C. JIHAD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

VAUGHN JACKSON; ANNIE ASKINS; DOCTOR BOULWARE;

LAURA BESSINGER; THOMAS MCCANTS; WILLIAM D.

CATOE, in their individual and official

capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CA-97-3852-2-22AJ)

Submitted: August 19, 1999 Decided: August 25, 1999

Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tahrim Supreme C. Jihad, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick

Lindemann, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Tahrim Supreme C. Jihad appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Jihad v. Jackson, No. CA-97-3852-2-22AJ

(D.S.C. Mar. 15, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF JOURNAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AS
OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 8, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-08-1995
<CASH>                                          10,867
<SECURITIES>                                    67,775
<RECEIVABLES>                                   95,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     31,361
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               216,854
<PP&E>                                         361,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                 202,965
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 473,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,105
<BONDS>                                          4,393
<COMMON>                                         3,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     366,728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   473,451
<SALES>                                        446,157
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               446,157
<CGS>                                          259,736
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  398,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  98
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,077
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,539
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,538
<DISCONTINUED>                                  16,014
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,552
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.69
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 215 (Tuesday, November 8, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67650-67651]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22167]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Chapter I

[Docket No. 2005N-0419]


Change of Name; Technical Amendment

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending its 
regulations to reflect a change in the name for AOAC INTERNATIONAL. 
This action is editorial in nature and is intended to improve the 
accuracy of the agency's regulations.

DATES: This rule is effective November 8, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joyce Strong, Office of Policy and 
Planning (HF-27), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-7010.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document amends FDA's regulations to 
reflect the name change of AOAC INTERNATIONAL by removing the outdated 
name wherever it appears and by adding the new name in its place in 21 
CFR parts 2, 10, 101, 102, 106, 114, 130, 131, 133, 135, 136, 137, 139, 
145, 146, 150, 155, 156, 160, 161, 163, 164, 166, 168, 169, 172, 173, 
176, 177, 178, 184, 189, 211, 226, 520, and 573.
    Publication of this document constitutes final action on these 
changes under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553). Notice 
and public procedure are unnecessary because FDA is merely correcting 
nonsubstantive errors.

0
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR 
chapter I is amended as follows:

[[Page 67651]]

Chapter I [Nomenclature changes]

0
1. Parts 2, 10, 101, 102, 106, 114, 130, 131, 133, 135, 136, 137, 139, 
145, 146, 150, 155, 156, 160, 161, 163, 164, 166, 168, 169, 172, 173, 
176, 177, 178, 184, 189, 211, 226, 520, and 573 are amended by removing 
the phrase ``Association of Official Analytical Chemists 
International'' and adding in its place ``AOAC INTERNATIONAL'' wherever 
it appears.

    Dated: November 1, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-22167 Filed 11-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1251

HOWARD M. MOORE, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BOARD OF EDUCATION FOR TALBOT COUNTY; J. SAMUEL MEEK, Superintendent; JOHN MASONE, Director, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-97- 3178-AMD) Submitted: August 10, 1999 Decided: August 31, 1999Before MOTZ and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James C. Strouse, Columbia, Maryland, for Appellant. Leslie Robert Stellman, Rochelle S. Eisenberg, Gail D. Allen, BLUM, YUMKAS, MAILMAN, GUTMAN & DENICK, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The order from which Moore appeals was filed on January 27, 1999, and entered on the district court’s docket on January 28, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a). See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM:Howard M. Moore, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action alleging employment discrimination and relatedclaims. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. Board of Educ. , No. CA-97-3178-AMD (D. Md. Jan. 28, 1999). * We grant the motion to submit the case to the court without oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code)

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Wm. Stacy Locke, President andChief Executive Officer of Pioneer Drilling Company, a Texas corporation (the “Company”),hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

 

(1)           the Company’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: | June 1, 2005 |   |   | /s/ Wm. Stacy Locke                   |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |         |   |   | Wm. Stacy Locke                       |
|   |         |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 99.1


                  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Journal Communications, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based
on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter ended October 6, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/Steven J. Smith
------------------------------------
Steven J. Smith
November 20, 2002