alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST M
& F CORPORATION





EXHIBIT
32.2





SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATIONS





In connection with the Annual Report of
First M&F Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, John G. Copeland, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





A.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





B.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:      November
23, 2009





/s/
      John G. CopelandJohn
      G. CopelandEVP
      & Chief Financial
Officer
# EUR-Lex - 32007M4514 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32007M4514

**Commission Decision of 24/01/2007 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.4514 - ADVENT / CARLYLE / H.C. STARCK) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal 025 , 03/02/2007 P. 0001 - 0001 *

Brussels, 24/01/2007

SG-Greffe(2006) D/200269/200270

To the notifying parties:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No. COMP/M.4514– Advent/Carlyle/H.C.Starck

Notification of 11/12/2006 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1]

Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 311, 19/12/2006, p.54

1. On 11/12/2006, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 by which several funds managed by Advent International Corporation ("Advent", USA) and Carlyle Europe Partners II, L.P., part of the Carlyle Group ("Carlyle", USA) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of the H.C. Starck group of companies ("H.C. Starck", Germany) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Advent: private equity investment;

- for Carlyle: private equity investment;

- for H.C. Starck: active in refractory metals and related compounds, advanced ceramics, conductive polymers and other electronic chemicals for industrial applications, including electronics and optics, medical equipment, aviation and aerospace, hard and heavy metals, energy automotive and chemicals.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph c, of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

signed

Philip LOWE

Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32

--------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7494
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee, versus GEORGE ALDEN BROWN, Petitioner - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CR-99-242, CA-01-2348-2-23) Submitted: April 25, 2003 Decided: May 30, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Alden Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: George Alden Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a motion under § 2255 unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude Brown has not made the requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , U.S. , 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
管辖权限制

第 11246 号行政命令

供应和服务

基本保障

任意

雇员人数

+ 价值超过 

$10,000 美元的

合同

AAP 保障

50

或更多雇员 +

价值 $50,000

美元或以上的

合同

建筑

基本保障

任意

雇员人数

+ 价值超过 

$10,000 美元的

合同

16 项规范

任意

雇员人数

+ 价值超过 

$10,000 美元的

合同

第 503 部分

供应和服务

基本保障

任意

雇员人数

+ 价值超过 

$15,000 美元的

合同

AAP 保障

50

或更多雇员

+ 价值 $50,000 

美元或以上的

合同

建筑

基本保障

任意

雇员人数

+ 价值超过 

$15,000 美元的

合同

AAP 保障

50

或更多雇员

+

价值 $50,000 

美元或以上的

合同

VEVRAA

供应和服务

基本保障

任意

雇员人数

+ 价值 $150,000

美元或以上的

合同

AAP 保障

50

或更多雇员 +

价值 $150,000 

美元或以上的

合同

建筑

基本保障

任意

雇员人数

+ 价值 $150,000 

美元或以上的

合同

AAP 保障

50

或更多雇员

+

价值 $150,000 

美元或以上的

合同

请注意第 503 部分和 VEVRAA 的保障要求不适用于联邦资助的建筑承包商。此外,第 503 部分和 VEVRAA 均受联邦法

规的约束,该法规根据通货膨胀对某些征用相关的美元阈值进行调整。

请注意,此页提供基本信息。无法取代与此处所述项目相关的现行法律和法规。

如果您对管辖权限制有任何疑问,请联系我们,电话:1-800-397-6251,听障专线:1-877-889-5627。

OFFICE OF FEDERAL CONTRACT

COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS

U.S. Department of Labor

2016 年 1 月
# L_2007322EN.01003301.xml

| 7.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 322/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 322/33

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1444/2007

of 6 December 2007

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007 of 14 September 2007 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale for export of sugar held by the intervention agencies of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007 of 14 September 2007 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale for export of sugar held by the intervention agencies of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 5 December 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 5 December 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 5 December 2007, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007 shall be 433,98 EUR/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 7 December 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 December 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 247/2007 (OJ L 69, 9.3.2007, p. 3). Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 will be replaced by Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1) as from 1 October 2008.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 242, 15.9.2007, p. 8.

2

---
<TABLE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12


                                          IES UTILITIES INC.
                           COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
<CAPTION>

                                                                                              Twelve Months
                                                   Year Ended December 31,                        Ended
                                      1991       1992       1993       1994       1995     September 30, 1996
                                 (in thousands, except ratio of earnings to fixed charges)

<S>                             <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Net income                        $  47,563  $  45,291  $  67,970  $  61,210  $  59,278  $            53,580

Federal and state
   income taxes                      23,494     20,723     37,963     37,966     41,095               40,382

      Net income before
         income taxes                71,057     66,014    105,933     99,176    100,373               93,962

Interest on long-term debt           31,171     35,689     34,926     37,942     36,375               35,698

Other interest                        5,595      3,939      5,243      3,630      8,085                8,677

Estimated interest
   component of rents                 6,594      4,567      3,729      3,970      4,637                4,361

Fixed charges as defined             43,360     44,195     43,898     45,542     49,097               48,736

Earnings as defined               $ 114,417  $ 110,209  $ 149,831  $ 144,718  $ 149,470  $           142,698

Ratio of earnings to fixed
  charges (unaudited)                  2.64       2.49       3.41       3.18       3.04                 2.93


For the purposes of computation of these ratios (a) earnings have been 
calculated by adding fixed charges and federal and state income taxes to 
net income; (b) fixed charges consist of interest (including amortization 
of debt expense, premium and discount) on long-term and other debt and
the estimated interest component of rents.
</TABLE>
O pinion filed May 27 , 201 6



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

____ _ ______


### No. 11

- 1 6

- 00 1 2 7

- C R

_____ __ ____


### PATRICIA GALINDO , Appellan t

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 70 th District Court

Ect or County, Texas Trial Court Cause No

. A

- 33,327

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant, Patricia Galindo, has filed in this court a motion to dismiss t h is
appeal . In the motion, Appellant asks that we withdraw her notice of appeal and

dismiss t his appeal. The motion is si gned by both Appellant and her counsel in

accordance with T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4 2.2

. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

May 27 , 2016 PER CURIAM
Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J

. , and Bailey, J.
No. 922, Misc.

#### Draper *v.*Washington et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

M.M., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 

SAN ANTONIO MILITARY MEDICAL 

CENTER, Fort Sam Houston, TX, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0298

Issued: May 25, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On December 19, 2022 appellant filed a timely appeal from an October 26, 2022

nonmerit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the 

Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 23-0298.

In a letter dated and received April 3, 2023, appellant requested that the appeal be

withdrawn.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that appellant’s request for the 

withdrawal of the appeal should be granted. Accordingly, 
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the withdrawal of the appeal 

is granted. The appeal docketed as No. 23-0298 is dismissed.

Issued: May 25, 2023

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
#### SMITH v. PERKINS

No. 14 PC.

Case below: 5 N.C. App. 120.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 29 August 1969.
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of K-tel International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kimmy Lockwood,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                     The reportfully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.                     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| By                            |   /s/ KIMMY LOCKWOOD |   |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
| Kimmy Lockwood                |
| *Principal Financial Officer* |
| November 22, 2006             |

 

 

----
Exhibit 99.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted),  Michael P. Perikly,  Chief Financial Officer of International Leisure
Hosts,  Ltd.  (the  "Company"),  hereby  certifies  that,  to  the  best  of his
knowledge:

1.       The  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB for the period  ended
         December 31, 2003, to which this  Certification  is attached as Exhibit
         99.2 (the "Quarterly Report"),  fully complies with the requirements of
         section  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
         amended; and

2.       The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,  in
         all  material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
         operations  of the  Company  at the end of the  period  covered  by the
         Quarterly  Report and  results of  operations  of the  Company  for the
         period covered by the Quarterly Report.




/s/ Michael P. Perikly

Michael P. Perikly
President and Chief Financial Officer
February 12, 2004




                                  Page 19 of 21
Order entered October 25, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01531-CR

HERBERT LOPEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-53754-W

ORDER

On June 4, 2013, we ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to prepare and file a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case, 

including, but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court appointed attorney fees. On 

June 19, 2013, the Dallas County District Clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record. However, 

the detailed itemization of costs included in the supplemental record does not comply with the 

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. arts. 103.001, 103.006 

(West 2006).

Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within SEVEN DAYS

of this order, a second supplemental clerk’s record that contains a detailed itemization of the 

costs assessed in this case that complies with articles 103.001 and 103.006 of the Texas Code of 
Criminal Procedure. See id. art. 103.001 (“A cost is not payable by the person charged with the 

cost until a written bill is produced or is ready to be produced, containing the items of cost, 

signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive payment for 

the cost.”) (emphasis added); 103.006 (“If a criminal action or proceeding . . . is appealed, an 

officer of the court shall certify and sign a bill of costs stating the costs that have accrued and 

send the bill of cost to the court to which the action or proceeding is . . . appealed) (emphasis 

added). We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include a document explaining 

any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court appointed attorney fee.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary 

Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Civil 

Records Division; and counsel for all parties.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                         3,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.001)



</TABLE>
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 140 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility 

of designating the President James K. Polk Home in Columbia, Tennessee, as a unit of the National Park System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 16, 2019 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself and Mrs. BLACKBURN) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility of designating the President James 

K. Polk Home in Columbia, Tennessee, as a unit of 

the National Park System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘James K. Polk Presi5 dential Home Study Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY OF JAMES K. POLK 

7 PRESIDENTIAL HOME. 

8 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 140 IS

1 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of the Interior. 

3 (2) STUDY AREA.—The term ‘‘study area’’ 

4 means the President James K. Polk Home in Co5 lumbia, Tennessee, and adjacent property. 

6 (b) SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY.— 

7 (1) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a spe8 cial resource study of the study area. 

9 (2) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under 

10 paragraph (1), the Secretary shall— 

11 (A) evaluate the national significance of 

12 the study area; 

13 (B) determine the suitability and feasibility 

14 of designating the study area as a unit of the 

15 National Park System; 

16 (C) consider other alternatives for preser17 vation, protection, and interpretation of the 

18 study area by the Federal Government, State or 

19 local government entities, or private and non20 profit organizations; 

21 (D) consult with interested Federal agen22 cies, State or local governmental entities, pri23 vate and nonprofit organizations, or any other 

24 interested individuals; and 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 140 IS

1 (E) identify cost estimates for any Federal 

2 acquisition, development, interpretation, oper3 ation, and maintenance associated with the al4 ternatives. 

5 (3) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required 

6 under paragraph (1) shall be conducted in accord7 ance with section 100507 of title 54, United States 

8 Code. 

9 (4) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the 

10 date on which funds are first made available for the 

11 study under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall sub12 mit to the Committee on Energy and Natural Re13 sources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural 

14 Resources of the House of Representatives a report 

15 that describes— 

16 (A) the results of the study; and 

17 (B) any conclusions and recommendations 

18 of the Secretary. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS