alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.3


 





 


Amendment
to Employment Agreement 


 


This first
amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement, dated January 29, 2021, is made this 28th day of
February 2022, by and between OptimizeRx Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Marion Odence-Ford (the “Executive”).


 


Base Salary:
The Executive shall be entitled to receive a base salary at a rate of $296,000.00 per annum, which base salary shall be payable in accordance
with the payroll practices of the Company, with such increases (but no decreases) as may be determined by the Compensation Committee of
the Board (the “Compensation Committee”) from time to time (as increased from time to time, the “Base Salary”). 


 


Annual Bonuses:
In addition to the Base Salary, the Executive shall be eligible to receive annual cash bonuses under the Company’s 2022 Cash Bonus
Plan and/or any other cash incentive plan maintained by the Company (such plan, the “Bonus Plan”), as determined by
the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion within the parameters of the Bonus Plan.


 


Equity: Following the Effective Date, the Executive may
receive grants of awards under the Company’s 2021 Equity Incentive Plan and/or any other equity-related incentive plan maintained
by the Company (such plan, the “Stock Plan”), as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion within
the parameters of the Stock Plan. The treatment of any equity awards held by the Executive under the Stock Plan in connection with
the termination of the Executive’s employment shall be determined under the Stock Plan and/or award agreement relating to such award.


 


Additional Compensation. The Executive shall be eligible
to receive such other compensation as may from time to time be awarded to her by the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion.


 


Effective
Date: January 1, 2022


 


Acknowledgment:


 


Except as
expressly set forth herein, all other terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.


 


	OptimizeRx, Corporation	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/ William J. Febbo	 
	Name: 	William J. Febbo	 
	Its:	Chief Executive Officer	 
	Date:	28 February 2022	 


 


Acknowledged and agreed:


 


	Marion Odence-Ford	 	 
	Printed Name	 	 
	 	 	 
	
    /s/ Marion Odence-Ford
	 	2/28/2022
	Signature	 	Date
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Earle M. Jorgensen Company (EMJ) for the period ended September 28, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William S. Johnson, as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary of EMJ, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) Information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of EMJ.



Date: November 10, 2005



|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|/s/    WILLIAM S.
JOHNSON                                               
|William S. Johnson Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EMJ and will be retained by EMJ and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### HERMAN M. DIAMOND, PLAINTIFF-PROSECUTOR, v. GUSTAV BACH, COUNTY CLERK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Argued June 18, 1931

Decided May 16, 1932.

Before Justices Trenchard and Donges.

Tor the prosecutor, *John Warren.*

Tor the respondents, *Herbert Ciarle Gilson.*

Per Curiam.

Application is made for a writ of *certiorari*to review a judgment entered in the District Court of the Tirst Judicial District of Hudson County, which judgment was subsequently docketed in the Hudson County Circuit Court.

A writ of *certiorari*was granted applicant on September 1st, 19.22, which was in 1926 dismissed for lack of prosecution.

*777In view of the circumstances of the case, as presented to us, we are constrained to deny the application for a writ of *certiorari.*

The application is denied, with costs.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6606

WILLIAM M. BRYSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARK C. MOORE, Assistant United States Attorney; REGAN PENDLETON, Assistant United States Attorney; MARTIN BROWN, Special Agent for the FBI; ROBERT SCOTT, Special Agent of the FBI; JANET BROWN, Internal Revenue Service Agent, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-82-6-20AK) Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 24, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William M. Bryson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: William M. Bryson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bryson v. Moore , No. CA-02-82-6-20AK (D.S.C. filed Feb. 22, 2002; entered Feb. 25, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER  <F1>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-08-2000
<CASH>                                              8,913
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     117,810
<ALLOWANCES>                                        5,520
<INVENTORY>                                        20,083
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  154,842
<PP&E>                                            555,885
<DEPRECIATION>                                    310,393
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    663,703
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             168,064
<BONDS>                                             4,237
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            3,600
<OTHER-SE>                                        470,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      663,703
<SALES>                                           617,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  617,014
<CGS>                                             323,413
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     209,643
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    684
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    83,442
<INCOME-TAX>                                       33,060
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                50,382
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       50,382
<EPS-BASIC>                                          1.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        1.86

<FN>
<F1>      10 ACCOUNTING PERIODS
</FN>



</TABLE>
# L_2007174EN.01000701.xml

| 4.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 174/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 174/7

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 782/2007

of 3 July 2007

amending Regulation (EC) No 634/2006 laying down the marketing standard applicable to headed cabbages

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 2(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The provisions on labelling in the marketing standard for headed cabbages laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 634/2006 (2) provide for the compulsory indication of the number of units on the package. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The provisions on labelling in the marketing standard for headed cabbages laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 634/2006 (2) provide for the compulsory indication of the number of units on the package.

| (2) | To facilitate trade and given the fact that headed cabbages are generally sold by weight and not by number of units, that requirement should be abolished. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

To facilitate trade and given the fact that headed cabbages are generally sold by weight and not by number of units, that requirement should be abolished.

| (3) | Regulation (EC) No 634/2006 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EC) No 634/2006 should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Fresh Fruit and Vegetables, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Fresh Fruit and Vegetables,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The second indent of point 6.1.D of the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 634/2006 is hereby deleted.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 July 2007.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2003 (OJ L 7, 11.1.2003, p. 64).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 112, 26.4.2006, p. 3.

2

---
#### GREENHILL v. CRABTREE

No. 86 PC.

No. 18 (Fall Term).

Case below: 45 N.C. App. 49.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 6 May 1980.
(b) (6)

- June 2017
#### ALEXANDER CLAY, JR. and CLEM E. CLAY v. ALONZA CLAY.

(Filed 10 April 1963.)

Judgments § IS; Quieting Title § 2—

Plaintiffs, in an action to quiet title, may assert that defendants claim under a tax foreclosure deed and may attack the validity of the tax foreclosure deed as to them on the ground that they held a vested remainder in the lands and were not panties to the tax foreclosure, since a void judgment is subject to collateral attack.

Appeal by plaintiff Olem E. Clay from *Bundy, J.,*October 1962 Civil Term of PERSON.

Civil action instituted under G.S. 41-10 to quiet title.

The complaint .alleges the following facts:

The two plaintffs and the defendant each own a one-twelfth undivided interest in a certain lot of land in Person County which they acquired by the will .of their grandfather, Alexander Clay, who devised the land to the father of the parties for life with remainder to his children *per stirpes.*Based on conveyances subsequent to a tax foreclosure proceeding to which the plaintiffs were not parties, the defendant claims the land in fee simple. Plaintiffs pray that the cloud of defendant’s adverse claim be removed from their interests in the property.

*252The defendant demurred to the complaint for that all the parties to the tax foreclosure proceeding are not parties to the present action; that the complaint'alleges no fraud or any ground for equitable relief; and that a motion in the tax foreclosure proceeding is the proper method to -contest its validity. Judge Bundy sustained the demurrer and dismissed plaintiffs’ action. The plaintiff Clem E. Clay appealed.

*Bums, Long and Burns for plaintiff appellants.*

*T. Jule Warren and Blackwell M. Brogden for defendant appellee..*

Per CuRiam.

For the purpose of testing the sufficiency of the complaint the demurrer admitted that the defendant claims title to the land 'described in the complaint under a tax foreclosure proceeding to which the plaintiffs, -remaindermen who each owned a one-twelfth interest in the land, were not made parties. The defendant demurred, and the demurrer was sustained, on the erroneous assumption that the plaintiffs may not collaterally attack the validity o.f the judgment in the tax foreclosure proceeding. This proposition was decided adversely to the defendant in *Eason v. Spence,*232 N.C. 579, 61 S.E. 2d 717, an ejectment action in which plaintiffs claimed land under a tax-sale foreclosure proceeding to which the remaindermen were not parties. This Court said, “The interest of the remaindermen was not affected by the judgment in the tax foreclosure suit, or by any proceeding had under it. . .A judgment void for want of jurisdiction is open to attack in a collateral proceeding.”

Under G.S. 41-10 each of the plaintiffs was entitled to maintain this action against the defendant to determine the validity of defendant’s adverse claim to his one-twelfth interest. *Wells v. Clayton,*236 N.C. 102, 72 S.E. 2d 16.

The judgment sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the action is

Reversed.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 15

- 00314

- CV

IN RE RAMSAY ALLEN RAMSEY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied, and the motion for emergency

relief is dismissed as moot.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition denied

Opi nion delivered and filed September 17, 2015

[OT06]
## NUMBER 13

- 2 3

- 00 165

- CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________
ALMA MARICELA CAVAZOS RAMIREZ
, Appellant
,

v.

HOLLYWOOD DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION, LLC
, Appellee

.

_

___________________________________________________________ On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7 of Hidalgo County, Texas.

_

___________________________________________________________ 

## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Tijerina, Silva, and Peña

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña

On April 24, 2023 , appellant filed a notice of appeal. On May 1 , 2023, the Clerk of

the Court notified appellant that h er notice of appeal was not in compliance with the Texas

Rule of Appella te Procedure 9.5(e) and (e)(2)

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 9.5(e), (e)(2).2 Appellant was asked to remit the $205.00 filing fee within ten days from the date of the

notice.

Furthermore, o n June 13 , 2023 , the C lerk of the Court again notified appellant of

the defe cts and that she was delinquent in remitting a $ 20 5.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this

Court notified appellant the appeal was subject to dismissal if the notice of appeal was

not amended or if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of th e

notice

. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c).

Appellant has n ot cured the defective notice of appeal, paid the filing fee

, nor

otherwise responded to the notices from the clerk requiring a response or other action

within the time specified; accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of

prosecution. See id.

L. ARON PEÑA JR

. Justice

D elivered and filed on the 3rd day o f August , 202 3

.
(b) (2)
(b) (2)
**Exhibit
      32.1**






**Section
      1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer**







The
      undersigned, the Chairman, President and Treasurer of Jaco Electronics, Inc.
      (the "Company"), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
      knowledge, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
      quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the “Quarterly Report”) accompanying
      this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of
      the dates and for the periods presented as required by such report. The
      foregoing certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities
      as principal executive officer of the Company, my own due diligence and
      representations made by certain other members of the Company’s senior
      management.





Date:  November
      14, 2007





/s/
      Joel H.
      Girsky


Joel
      H.
      Girsky


Chairman,
      President and Treasurer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      18,110
<SECURITIES>                                   635
<RECEIVABLES>                              115,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                (2,636)
<INVENTORY>                                 33,768
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           173,877
<PP&E>                                     345,549
<DEPRECIATION>                            (156,365)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             430,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       69,177
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    16,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                 324,533
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               430,377
<SALES>                                    248,117
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           248,117
<CGS>                                      165,012
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              165,012
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               919
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             23,621
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,794
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         15,811
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                15,811
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .97
        















</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer**
I, Joel H. Girsky, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended March 31, 2004 of Jaco Electronics, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 

 

 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 14, 2004              /s/ Joel H. Girsky   Joel H. Girsky   Chairman, President and Treasurer