alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN INTERSTATE ENERGY CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>   0000352541
<NAME>  INTERSTATE ENERGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    3,057,117
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  1,109,481
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         364,315
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        91,771
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 326,635
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,949,319
<COMMON>                                           769
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      881,734
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            777,305<F1>
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,659,808
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           24,331
<PREFERRED>                                     89,102
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,489,369
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              35,324
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       56,975
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  77,651
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   68,985
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     19,338
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                13,211
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,414,225
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                4,949,319
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,047,295
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            19,124<F2>
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     934,588
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     934,588<F2>
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        112,707
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (4,018)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 108,689
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        63,155
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,410
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      3,349
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   23,061
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        79,455
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       92,333
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         218,211
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
<FN>
<F1>Includes $215,039 of accumulated other comprehensive income.
<F2>Income tax expense is not included in Operating Expenses in the Consolidated
Statements of Income.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Gabriel SANTOS, Petitioner, v. Walter KELLY, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility, and the Attorney General of the State of New York, Respondents.

No. 89 C 3048.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

June 19, 1990.

*680Gabriel Santos, pro se.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NICKERSON, District Judge.

Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2554.

On June 24, 1987, petitioner pled guilty in County Court of Suffolk County to one count of aggravated assault on a police officer, New York Penal Law § 120.11, and was sentenced on July 27,1987 to eight and one-third years to twenty-five years imprisonment, and a mandatory surcharge of $100.00.

The County Court denied petitioner’s motion of April 21,1988 to vacate his sentence on the grounds he had been promised a more lenient sentence and that he was not permitted to make a statement at his sentencing. On appeal petitioner sought a sentence reduction claiming the sentence imposed was “harsh and severe” and that the imposition of a mandatory surcharge violated his constitutional rights. The Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed petitioner’s sentence on April 17, 1989. The Court of Appeals denied leave to appeal on June 29, 1989.

Petitioner raises three claims, namely, that his sentence was disproportionate to his crime; that the mandatory surcharge constitutes cruel and unusual punishment; and that his plea bargain was not honored by the court. He also claims the court must conduct an evidentiary hearing prior to resolving these claims.

Petitioner’s claim that his sentence was harsh was not presented in federal terms, a prerequisite for obtaining federal habeas corpus relief. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). A petitioner has not exhausted state court remedies unless his claim was presented to the state courts in some manner that would alert them to its constitutional nature. *See Daye v. Attorney General,*696 F.2d 186 (2d Cir.1982).

Petitioner’s brief on appeal was directed solely to the state court’s discretion to review a sentence in the interests of justice and mercy, not towards argument that the term imposed was “cruel and unusual punishment” under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The court may not entertain a petition for habeas corpus until the applicant has exhausted available state remedies with respect to all claims the petition presents. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b); *Rose v. Lundy,*455 U.S. 509, 102 S.Ct. 1198, 71 L.Ed.2d 379 (1982). Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Petitioner may choose to file a new petition raising only his exhausted claims, or to proceed to exhaust his state court remedies with respect to his other claim.

So ordered.
U N IT E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

_____________ No. 08-3650

_____________ I n re: GL OB AL

I NDUSTRI AL

TECHNOL OGI ES, I

NC., et al., Debtors

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- HA RTF ORD A CCI DENT AN D I ND EMNI TYCO MPA

NY ; F I RST STA TE I

NSU RA NC E CO MPA

NYCO ; TWI N C I TYF I RE I

NSU RA NC E CO MPA

NY ; CENTURY I

NDEMNI TY COMPANY, as suc cessor to CI GNA Spec ialty

Company , fo rm e rl y kn ow n a s Ca lif

or nia Un ion Ins ur anc e Com

pa ny ; WEST CH EST ER F I RE I NSU RA NC E CO MPA

NY , f or its e lf and fo r I nte rn a tio na l In s ur an c e C o m

p an y ( n o w kn o w na s T IG In s ur an c e C o mp an y) (b y op e ratio n o f n ov a tio n a ll r ig hts and ob lig a tio ns un de r t

he po lic ie s have be en tra

nsfer red f rom International I nsuranc e Co. to Westchester F ire Insuranc e Co.); NATI ONAL

UNI ON F I RE I

NSURANCE COMPANY OF PI TTSBURGH, PA; I

NSURANCE COMPANY OF TH E STATE OF PENNSYL VANIA; L EXI NGTONI

NSURANCE COMPANY; AMERI CAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, and any other e ntities related to Amer ican International Group, Inc. that eng ag ed in business transa ctions with the Reorg anizing De btors,

Ap pe lla nts P RES ENT : M CKEE , Ch i e f J u d g e , S CI RI CA, AM BRO, F UENTE S , S M I TH, F I S HER, C H A G A R E S, J O R D A N , V A N A SK I E , C i r cui t J udges O R D E R A m aj o ri ty

o f t h e a ct i v e j u d ges h av i n g v o t edfo r r eh ea ri n g en banc in t he a bo ve a pp e a l, i t i s o rd er edth atth e C l erk

o f t h i s C o urt l i s tth e ab o v e c as e f o r r eh ea ri n g en banc at the conve nience of the Court
. BYTHE COURT, /s/ Theodore A . McKe e Chief J udg e
DATED: J une 10, 2010 ty w/cc: All counsel of r ecor d
#### Solomon Bergman *vs.*St. Paul, Stillwater & Taylor’s Falls Railroad Company.

May 14, 1875.

• Condemnation of land — Dismissal of Proceedings — Action of Land Owner to Recover Ms Expenses in opposing. — Under the provisions of ch. 34, Gen. Stat., defendant instituted proceedings to condemn plaintiff’s land for the purposes of its road. Both parties appealed from the award of commissioners to the district court for Ramsey county. At the December term, the appeal was placed upon the calendar for trial, and the parties appeared by their attorneys; but during the term, defendant, with the permission of the court, (plaintiff objecting,) dismissed the proceedings for condemnation, and caused the dismissal to be entered of record. All the proceedings (including the appeals) were duly had as provided by law. *Held,*that the plaintiff cannot, upon this state of facts, maintain an action to recover for his labor, loss of time, and expenses in conducting and attending to the proceedings on his part.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the court of common pleas for Bamsey county, *Hall,*J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

*I. V. D. Heard,*for appellant.

*P. G. Palmer,*for respondent.

Berry, J.

Under the provisions of ch. 34, G-en. Stat., the defendant instituted proceedings to condemn plaintiff’s land for the purposes of its road. From the award made by commissioners, both parties appealed to the district court for Bamsey county. At the December term, the appeal was placed upon the calendar for trial, and the parties appeared *534by their attorneys; but during the term, the defendant, with the permission of the court, (plaintiff objecting,) dismissed the proceedings for condemnation, and caused the dismissal to be entered of record. All the proceedings (including the appeal) were duly had as provided by law.

The plaintiff brings this action to recover for his labor, loss of time and expenses in conducting and attending to the proceedings on his part, including money paid for the services of his attorney, and for the fees of witnesses, and of the clerk of the court.

If the plaintiff is entitled to recover, it must be by virtue of some contract, express or implied, or of some positive rule of law conferring upon him a right of action, or upon the ground that defendant has been guilty of a tort. Certainly there is no contract here, nor is there any positive rule of law upon which plaintiff can base a right of action. Neither is there anything in the complaint tending to show any tortious or malicious conduct on the part of defendant. On the contrary, defendant’s proceedings are expressly admitted to have been duly and regularly taken, as provided by law, and there is nothing whatever to raise a suspicion that defendant’s motives or purposes in instituting, conducting or dismissing the proceedings, were not entirely proper. - In other words, the complaint does not set up a cause of action in tort, nor assume to do so. Order sustaining demurrer to complaint affirmed.
#### STATE v. WILLIAM ROBERT WHITE, JR.

(Filed 14 January, 1966.)

Appeal by defendant from *Houk,*JJuly 1965 Session of Chatham.

Defendant was convicted of resisting arrest and of assault on an officer and judgment was pronounced in the Chatham County Recorder’s Court. He appealed to the Superior Court of Chatham County and .was there tried *de novo*upon an amended warrant which, in part, charged that defendant “did unlawfully and wilfully resist, delay and obstruct a public officer, to wit: Reece Coble, a Policeman for the Town of Pittsboro, while he, the said Reece *362Coble was attempting to discharge and discharging a duty of his office, to wit: by striking the said Reece Coble with his fist.”

Evidence was offered by the State and by defendant.

The .jury returned a verdict of “Guilty of Assault.” The court pronounced judgment “that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Chatham County for a period of ten (10) days.”

*Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Bullock for the State.*

*James C. Harper for defendant appella/nt.*

PER Cubiam.

The court was of the opinion, and rightly so, that the amended warrant was insufficient to charge a violation of G.S. 14-223. See *S. v. Smith,*262 N.C. 472, 474, 137 S.E. 2d 819, and cases cited. Hence, the trial was conducted solely with reference to whether defendant was guilty of a simple assault on Reece Coble, a police officer.

Defendant’s motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit was properly overruled. The matters referred to in defendant’s exceptions to the charge are not considered of such prejudicial nature as to justify a new trial. Hence, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.

No error.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,TO
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO,TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of The X-Change  Corporation on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2005,  as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Scott
R. Thompson,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



/By:/s/ Scott R. Thompson
Scott R. Thompson, Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


November 14, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                        (RYDER SCOTT COMPANY LETTERHEAD)



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

        As independent oil and gas consultants, Ryder Scott Company, L.P.,
hereby consents to the use of our reserve report dated as of December 31, 2001
and to all references to our firm included in or made apart of the Mission
Resources Corporation's Form 10-K to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on or about March 1, 2004, and to the incorporation by reference
thereof into Mission Resources Corporation's previously filed Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (333-111955) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-105169,
333-63562, 333-54798, 333-57827, 333-27707 and 333-91326).


                                             /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

                                             RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

Houston, Texas
March 1, 2004
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

TheBoard of Directors

Cache, Inc.:

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-65113,333-84848, 333-96717 and 333-110553) on Forms S-8 ofCache, Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2005, with respect to theconsolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows, forthe year ended January 1, 2005, which report appears in the December 30,2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Cache, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

NewYork, New York

March 15, 2007

----
Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health

April 20, 2020

Mr. Eugene Scalia

Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor

Frances Perkins Building

200 Constitution Ave.

Washington, DC

Dear Mr. Scalia:

I am pleased to transmit a recommendation and a response of the DOL Advisory Board 

on Toxic Substances and Worker Health in relation to the Board’s advisory capacity to the 

Energy Employees’ Occupational Illness Compensation Program (EEOICP). These were adopted 

unanimously at our April 15-16, 2020 meeting. They include:

1) Response to Office of Workers’ Compensation Program Request about B 

readings,

2) Additional Recommendation on Occupational Health Questionnaire.

The Board hopes that our input is useful to EEOICP. It remains an honor for the Board to 

be consulted on important issues that face the Program. I am available to answer any questions.

Sincerely,

/s/

Steven Markowitz MD, DrPH

Chair

Advisory Board on Toxic Substances 

and Worker Health
Exhibit 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of The X-Change  Corporation  on Form
10-QSB for the period ending  September  30, 2002, as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Susan  Landin,
Chief Operating Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/ Susan Landin
Chief Operating Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
November 14, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 210 (Tuesday, November 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65909-65910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21657]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Sleep Disorders Research Advisory Board.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting:

    Name of Committee: Sleep Disorders Research Advisory Board.
    Date: December 6, 2005.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To discuss sleep research and education priorities and 
programs.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 
Conference Room D, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Carl E Hunt, MD, Director, National Center on 
Sleep Disorders Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 
National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 6022, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/435-0199.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. This statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    In the interest of security, NIH has instituted stringent 
procedures for entrance into the building by non-governmental 
employees. Persons without a government I.D. will need to show a 
photo I.D. and sign-in at the security desk upon entering the 
building.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/meetings/index.htm, where an agenda 
and any additional

[[Page 65910]]

information for the meeting will be posted when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 20, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-21657 Filed 10-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.
33-99432, No. 333-32157 and No. 333-58134) of Intelligent Systems Corporation of
our report dated March 20, 2002 with respect to consolidated financial
statements of VISaer, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2000
included in the Form 10-K of Intelligent Systems Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                        /s/ Moody, Famiglietti & Andronico, LLP


Boston, MA
March 26, 2003
EXHIBIT 23A CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-34442) pertaining to stock option plans of AutoInfo, Inc. of our report
dated March 26, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
AutoInfo, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2007. /s/ Dworken,
  Hillman, LaMorte & Sterczala, P.C.Shelton,
  Connecticut
Dworken,
  Hillman, LaMorte & Sterczala, P.C.March 26,
  2008
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Annual Report of Unified Western Grocers Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended September 27, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alfred A. Plamann, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:    December 15, 2003



/s/    ALFRED A.
PLAMANNAlfred A. PlamannPresident and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### SINK v. EASTER

No. 24 PC.

Case below: 19 N. C. App. 151.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 2 October 1973.
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5655 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the Little River Branch facility of the United 

States Postal Service located at 140 NE 84th Street 

in Miami, Florida, as the ‘‘Jesse J. McCrary, Jr. Post 

Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5655 RFS

1 SECTION 1. JESSE J. MCCRARY, JR. POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Little River Branch facility 

3 of the United States Postal Service located at 140 NE 

4 84th Street in Miami, Florida, shall be known and des5 ignated as the ‘‘Jesse J. McCrary, Jr. Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jesse J. McCrary, 

10 Jr. Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 16, 

2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS