[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 214 (Monday, November 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67490-67494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Food Safety Inspection Service

[Docket No. 05-013N]


Meeting To Discuss Possible Changes to the Regulatory 
Jurisdiction of Certain Food Products Containing Meat and Poultry

AGENCIES: Food and Drug Administration, HHS; Food Safety Inspection 
Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in the Department of 
Health and Human Services, and the Food Safety Inspection Service 
(FSIS), in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), are 
jointly announcing a public meeting to discuss and solicit information 
on an approach for providing consistency and predictability with 
respect to which of the two agencies should have jurisdiction over 
certain types of food products that contain meat and poultry as 
ingredients, as well as the opening of a joint agency docket to receive 
written comments. This notice outlines that approach and solicits 
comments on it and on the specific questions asked in section II below.

DATES: The public meeting will be held on December 15, 2005, from 10 
a.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held at the Donald E. Stephens 
Convention Center, 5555 North River Road, Rosemont, IL 60018, 847-692-
0222.
    You may submit comments, identified with Docket No. 05-013N, by any 
of the following methods:
    <bullet> Electronic mail:
    FSIS: FSIS <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#35475052405954415c5a5b46765a5858505b41467553465c461b404651541b525a43"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fd8f989a88919c899492938ebe9290909893898ebd9b8e948ed3888e999cd39a928b">[email protected]</span></a>. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments on the Agency's Web site.

[[Page 67491]]

    <bullet> FAX:
    FSIS: 202-690-0486.
    <bullet> Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (For paper, disk, or CD-ROM 
submissions):
    FSIS: Docket Clerk, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and 
Inspection Service, 300 12th Street, SW., Room 102 Cotton Annex, 
Washington, DC 20250
    FDA: Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include Docket No. 05-
013N. All comments received will be posted without change to: (FSIS) 
http://www.fsis.usda.gov/regulations_&_policies/2005_Notices_Index/index.asp.; (FDA) http://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
    Submissions received must include the Agency name and Docket No. 
05-013N. All comments submitted will be available for public inspection 
in the Agencies' Docket Offices and on the Agencies' Web sites.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions about the 
meeting contact Marion V. Allen, Center for Food Safety and Applied 
Nutrition (HFS-32), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch 
Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 301-436-1584, FAX: 301-436-2605, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3954584b505657175855555c57795f5d581751514a175e564f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6805091a010706460904040d06280e0c094600001b460f071e">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Please see Section III. Registration, for information on how to 
register for the Public Meeting.
    For technical questions about the subject of the meeting: FDA: 
Karen Carson, Director, Executive Operations Staff (EOS), Center for 
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-22), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 301-
436-1664, FAX: 301-436-2668, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e9828a889b9a8687a98a8f9a8887c78f8d88c78e869f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d0bbb3b1a2a3bfbe90b3b6a3b1befeb6b4b1feb7bfa6">[email protected]</span></a>.
    FSIS: Philip S. Derfler, Assistant Administrator, Office of Policy, 
Program, and Employee Development (OPPED), Food Safety Inspection 
Service, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Suite 350-E Whitten Building, 
Washington, DC 20250, (202) 720-2709, FAX: (202) 720-2025, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e1b189888d8891cfa58493878d8493a187928892cf94928580cf868e97"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c5c646560657c2248697e6a60697e4c6a7f657f22797f686d226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

I. Background

    Both FSIS and FDA have regulatory authority over the food supply. 
Under the Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA), Poultry Products 
Inspection Act (PPIA), and Egg Products Inspection Act (EPIA), FSIS has 
authority over all meat and poultry products and processed egg 
products. Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), FDA 
has authority over all foods not under FSIS' jurisdiction (e.g., dairy, 
bread and other grain products, vegetables and other produce, and other 
products such as seafood).
    Over the years, FSIS has made jurisdictional decisions based on 
various factors, including the amount of meat or poultry in the 
product; whether the product is represented as a meat or poultry 
product (that is, whether a term that refers to meat or poultry is used 
on labeling); and whether the product is perceived by consumers as a 
product of the meat or poultry industries. With regard to the consumer 
perception factor, FSIS has made decisions on a case-by-case basis, 
mostly in response to situations involving compliance and enforcement. 
Although this case-by-case approach resulted in decisions that made 
sense at the time, a recent review by the agencies highlighted that 
some decisions do not appear to be fully consistent with other product 
decisions and that the reasoning behind various determinations were not 
fully articulated. For example, the reasoning for deciding that a 
``bagel dog'' (a product composed of a hotdog wrapped in bagel dough 
which is then baked) was not a meat product was conveyed in a letter 
from FSIS to a trade association in 1979 (Letter from Irwin Fried, 
Acting Director, Meat and Poultry Standards and Labeling Division, to 
Pacific Coast Meat Association, January 8, 1979). The letter stated 
that the product was viewed as a ``closed-face'' sandwich and, thus, 
was not under FSIS jurisdiction. However, the Agency did not explain 
why such products were viewed as closed-face sandwiches or the 
importance of this view. Moreover, the letter did not explain why bagel 
dogs were different than other products that were similarly configured, 
e.g., ``corn dogs'' and ``sausage turnovers,'' that were, and continue 
to be, manufactured under FSIS jurisdiction.
    Confusion persists about the reasoning used with respect to various 
decisions about which agency has jurisdiction over certain food 
products containing meat and poultry. For example, manufacturers have 
wanted to change the original formulations of products that were the 
subject of jurisdictional decisions, e.g., bagel dogs and pepperoni 
rolls.\1\ By adding new ingredients, e.g., adding cheese and other meat 
and poultry ingredients, manufacturers have created ``bagel dogs with 
cheese'' and ``pepperoni, ham, and cheese rolls.'' Although the 
manufacturers requested that FSIS categorize these new products like 
their predecessors, FSIS has denied these kinds of requests because, 
without a clear rationale supporting the original decisions, FSIS 
believed that confusion would be compounded further by perpetuating the 
rationale contained in the original decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Pepperoni rolls are a product that was the subject of a FSIS 
jurisdictional decision in 1986. They are a product that is composed 
of pieces of pepperoni that are distributed in bread dough which is 
then baked.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In other situations, manufacturers have expressed confusion about 
the classification of new versions of traditional food products because 
products with similar composition are produced under the jurisdiction 
of a different agency. For example, FSIS decided decades ago that 
closed-face sandwiches made with meat ingredients were not meat 
products and, thus, were products under FDA's regulatory jurisdiction. 
Recently, manufacturers of ``wrap-type sandwiches with meat'' have 
argued that wraps are similar enough to closed-face sandwiches such 
that wraps should fall under FDA's jurisdiction. There are wrap-like 
products, (meat burritos, meat egg rolls, and meat tamales), which FSIS 
has categorized as meat products and which are more similar in 
composition to the wrap-sandwich. Because wrap-type sandwiches are new 
to the market and the historic decision about closed-face sandwiches 
did not include them, FSIS concluded that wrap-type sandwiches are meat 
products.
    These and other circumstances led FSIS and FDA to conduct an in-
depth examination of the historic decisions about regulatory 
jurisdiction made by FSIS. An FSIS-FDA working group met to explore the 
issue and to develop an approach for making sound, clear, and 
transparent decisions about product categorization and agency 
jurisdiction.
    As a result of the working group's findings, the agencies concluded 
that a clearer approach to determining jurisdiction is possible. This 
approach involves considering the contribution of the meat or poultry 
ingredients to the identity of the food. In some cases, the meat or 
poultry ingredients are distinctive and significantly contribute to a 
food's basic nature by characterizing the food. In other cases, the 
meat or poultry ingredients are used in such a way that they do not 
contribute to the product's basic nature because they are not easily 
distinguished and are used to simply add flavor. The agencies 
recognized, however, that application of this approach could lead to 
changes in jurisdiction for certain foods and categories of foods and 
thus felt that it was important to present this approach

[[Page 67492]]

for public comment before taking steps to implement any changes.
    A change in jurisdiction may be in order for the products and 
product categories described below. Bagel dogs, closed-face meat and 
poultry-containing sandwiches, and natural casings, regulation of which 
would move from FDA to FSIS jurisdiction, are products or product 
categories characterized by the meat or poultry ingredients that they 
contain. Further, these products are identified by terms that refer to 
the meat and poultry ingredients, reflecting the contribution of the 
meat and poultry components. In contrast, meat and poultry components 
are added to other products/product categories, such as bread/rolls/
buns, cheese products, flavors, pizzas, and salad dressings, to add 
flavor but not to alter the character of the products. Such products 
would move from FSIS to FDA jurisdiction.

Bagel Dogs

    Bagel dogs were the subject of a jurisdiction decision that FSIS 
made almost 20 years ago. The decision made at that time was that a 
product composed of a cooked hotdog wrapped in bagel dough, which is 
baked, is not itself a meat product. Bagel dogs thus fell under FDA 
jurisdiction. Bagel dogs, however, are similar to other meat-filled, 
dough-encased or wrapped products--such as corn dogs and sausage 
turnovers--which have historically been under FSIS jurisdiction. These 
products are composed of a meat or poultry filling that is encased or 
wrapped in dough or crust which provides a convenient container for the 
ingredients for hand-held eating. The meat and poultry components 
characterize the products and the characteristics of the meat/poultry 
ingredients are not changed by the bread, dough, or crust around it. 
Because the agencies have not been able to distinguish bagel dogs from 
corn dogs and similar products, the agencies are considering changing 
the jurisdiction of bagel dogs from FDA to FSIS.

Natural Casings

    At least as far back as the 1950's, USDA made a jurisdictional 
decision that natural casings, which are used for sausages and other 
stuffed and formed meat and poultry products, are not meat byproducts 
because they serve as a container or packaging for the meat or poultry 
put in the casing. As a result, natural casings have been under FDA 
jurisdiction. But natural casings originate from meat byproducts, 
(specifically, from parts of livestock digestive tracts) which are 
under FSIS jurisdiction. The process of sanitizing and sizing the 
livestock materials does not change them to the degree that their basic 
identity as meat byproducts such as bungs, stomachs, intestines is 
changed. Therefore, the agencies are considering changing the 
jurisdiction of this category of products from FDA to FSIS.

Closed-Face Sandwiches Made With Meat or Poultry

    According to FSIS policy going back to the 1930's, closed-face 
sandwiches (products containing at least 35% cooked meat and poultry 
products, by weight, placed between 2 slices of bread, biscuit, or bun, 
which are less than 50 percent of the weight of the product) were not 
meat or poultry products because consumers viewed them as products 
primarily prepared in local food service establishments (FSIS Food 
Standards and Labeling Policy Book, 2003). Today, however, sandwiches 
containing meat or poultry components in their majority are made in 
manufacturing facilities and are shipped in interstate commerce. 
Moreover, in determining regulatory jurisdiction, it makes sense to 
consider the contribution of the meat ingredient to the product.
    Meat and poultry sandwiches are generally consumed for the 
distinctive meat and poultry ingredients, not for the bread that 
surrounds them. In other words, it is the meat or poultry ingredients 
that characterize the sandwich, which is not changed by the bread, 
biscuit, or bun between which they are placed. Furthermore, sandwiches 
are similar to the other meat- or poultry-filled, dough-encased or 
wrapped products that were discussed earlier have historically been 
under FSIS jurisdiction. Therefore, the agencies are considering 
changing the jurisdiction of these products from FDA to FSIS.

Cheese and Cheese Products (Including Cheese Dips) Made With Less Than 
50 Percent Meat or Poultry

    Products that meet the standards of identity in 21 CFR Part 133 for 
Cheeses and Cheese Products (i.e., pasteurized blended cheese, process 
cheese, cheese food, cheese spread) are not considered meat or poultry 
products. The standard of identity for such products allows for 
optional ingredients, including meat ingredients. Based on this 
standard, FSIS decided many years ago that some cheese products such as 
cheese balls and cheese logs that include small pieces of inspected and 
passed ready-to-eat meat (e.g., dried sausage or cooked bacon) at less 
than 50 percent of their formulation (by weight) were not meat products 
and should fall under FDA jurisdiction. However, this FSIS decision has 
never been extended to all cheese and cheese products or to those that 
contain poultry. The agencies have considered this decision and, as a 
result, the agencies are suggesting that the addition of less than 50 
percent inspected and passed ready-to-eat meat or poultry ingredients 
does not change the characteristics of cheese or cheese products 
(whether or not the product is covered by an FDA standard of identity) 
because, at less than 50 percent of the weight of the product, the meat 
or poultry added is used for flavoring effect. Therefore, the agencies 
are considering changing the jurisdiction of these products from FSIS 
to FDA.

Bread, Rolls, and Buns Made With Less Than 50 Percent Meat or Poultry

    The jurisdiction of pepperoni rolls is an example of a bread-based 
product that has caused confusion since a decision was made in 1986 by 
FSIS that such a product is not a meat product, and is, therefore, 
under FDA's jurisdiction (Letter from Margaret O. Glavin to State of 
West Virginia, Department of Agriculture, January 8, 1986). The 
original decision was made for a product that was composed of small 
pieces of pepperoni that were dispersed throughout bread dough and 
baked. At the time, the product was prepared in such a way that it was 
viewed by FSIS as being a product of the bakery industry. More 
recently, FSIS has viewed products with variations of the original 
formulation (e.g., pepperoni, ham, and cheese rolls) as meat and 
poultry products because these products are not consistent with the 
formulation of the product for which the original jurisdictional 
decision was made.
    In reviewing the decision about pepperoni rolls and the other 
decisions made about bread-based products over the years, the agencies 
considered the standards of identity for bakery products in 21 CFR Part 
136, Bakery Products. Such products, which include bread, rolls, and 
buns, are foods produced by baking dough made from farinaceous 
ingredients into which optional ingredients may be dispersed for 
flavor. Meat and poultry are not permitted optional ingredients in the 
standards for breads, rolls, and buns in Part 136. Therefore, these 
foods to which meat or poultry are added are non-standardized foods. 
The agencies believe that meat and poultry ingredients can be added to 
any bakery product for flavoring.
    The agencies are now considering changing the jurisdiction from 
FSIS to

[[Page 67493]]

FDA of the original pepperoni roll products, as well as those foods 
with variations of this original formulation. Such products would be 
prepared with less than 50 percent inspected and passed ready-to-eat 
meat or poultry, dispersed throughout the dough for a flavoring effect. 
(As a general matter, most products containing meat or poultry are 
composed of well below or well above 50 percent meat or poultry by 
weight.)

Dried Poultry Soup Mixes

    Dried meat soup mixes, regardless of the amount of meat they 
contain, are currently under FDA jurisdiction based on a FSIS decision 
made decades ago, which is reflected in the FSIS Food Standards and 
Labeling Policy Book (2003). Dried poultry soup mixes, however, have 
historically been considered to be poultry products (FSIS Food 
Standards and Labeling Policy Book). This has been a point of disparity 
and confusion. Based on FSIS' experience in reviewing product 
formulations, dried soup mixes with meat or poultry are composed of 
less than 50 percent inspected and passed dried/powdered meat/poultry 
(by weight). The meat and poultry components used to prepare these 
products are not in a form that is recognized as ``meat'' or 
``poultry'' and are used at low levels for seasoning or flavoring 
effects. For this reason and for the sake of parity, the agencies are 
considering changing the jurisdiction of dried poultry soup mixes from 
FSIS to FDA.

Flavor Bases/Flavors

    Flavor bases and reaction/process flavors are produced by rigorous 
heating (e.g., 100 [deg]C or higher) and by chemical processes (e.g., 
hydrolysis/enzymolysis). Such products that are prepared with inspected 
and passed meat or poultry ingredients are in a powder, slurry, or 
paste form. They are used in other products for a flavoring effect, not 
for their contribution to the meat or poultry content of the food 
products. Furthermore, such products are typically sold for use within 
the food industry, not for use by household consumers. Therefore, the 
agencies are considering changing the jurisdiction of this category of 
products from FSIS to FDA.

Pizzas With Meat or Poultry

    In 2003, FSIS eliminated the standard of identity for traditional 
pizzas with meat or poultry (68 FR 44859, July 31, 2003). Thus, 
traditional pizzas composed of sauce, cheese, and inspected and passed 
meat or poultry toppings on a layered crust need only contain 2 percent 
meat or poultry by weight to be under FSIS jurisdiction. However, the 
base onto which toppings are placed represents the majority of the 
product, and meat or poultry ingredients may be among any number of 
toppings used for flavoring purposes. While the meat or poultry 
toppings provide flavoring to the finished food, they do not change the 
character of the food. Because non-meat/poultry pizzas have always been 
under FDA's jurisdiction, and the meat or poultry ingredients are 
generally used to provide flavor, the agencies are considering changing 
the jurisdiction of these products from FSIS to FDA.

Salad Dressings Made With Less Than 50 Percent Meat or Poultry

    Over the years, FSIS has made jurisdictional decisions that salad 
dressing products made with cooked meat ingredients (e.g., cooked 
bacon) are not meat products. The basis for the decisions was that such 
products were consistent with the standards of identity for 
``dressings'' in 21 CFR Part 169, Food Dressings and Flavorings. 
Although the standards do not list meat ingredients as optional 
ingredients, the meat ingredients were not considered to characterize 
the dressings as meat products, nor were they considered to 
characterize non-standardized dressings, such as vinaigrettes. As 
optional ingredients, the meat or poultry ingredients are intended to 
provide flavor and do not contribute to the characterization of the 
products as salad dressings. There has, however, been occasional 
confusion regarding under which agency would regulate the product. The 
agencies therefore are contemplating making clear that salad dressings 
that contain less than 50 percent inspected and passed, ready-to-eat 
meat or poultry ingredients by weight (e.g., cooked bacon), are not 
meat or poultry products and are under FDA jurisdiction.
    The agencies recognize that these jurisdictional changes would 
affect firms and establishments, as well as the agencies themselves. It 
is unlikely that, in most cases, affected firms or establishments would 
have to overhaul production facilities or processing operations, 
significantly alter marketing approaches, or change product 
formulations to take actions to meet the regulatory requirements of one 
or the other agency. It is likely, however, that with the suggested 
changes in jurisdiction, there will be additional administrative, 
inspection, and labeling requirements. For example, firms moving to 
FSIS jurisdiction would need to: receive grants of inspection; develop 
and implement hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) plans, 
sanitation standard operating procedures (SSOPs), and pathogen control 
and other laboratory testing procedures; develop and implement systems 
of recordkeeping; and obtain product label approvals.

II. Public Meeting

    FSIS and FDA are holding this public meeting in order to gain 
public input on the ideas set out in this notice and on the impact of 
the changes discussed herein. In order to benefit from this public 
meeting, the agencies are seeking input on a number of questions, 
including:
    <bullet> Is the approach that is suggested by the agencies a 
reasonable one? If not, why not?
    <bullet> Are there other food products or product categories that 
have been the subject of historical regulatory jurisdictional decisions 
by FSIS, which were based on a consumer perception factor, that should 
be considered by the agencies?
    <bullet> How many firms or establishments would be affected for 
each product and product category? What is the volume of production for 
each product or product category?
    <bullet> Would there be modifications in equipment, facility 
design, labeling, recordkeeping, or processing and reporting 
responsibilities that are needed in order for current operations to 
continue making the products that are the subject of the suggested 
changes, and what are they?
    <bullet> What would the administrative, operational, marketing, and 
labeling costs be associated with changes in product jurisdiction?
    <bullet> What would be a reasonable process and time frame within 
which to implement any changes in jurisdiction?
    <bullet> What would be consumers' views of the subject products 
under the suggested approach? More particularly, what effect would 
changing regulatory jurisdiction have on consumers' perceptions of the 
subject products? For example, what would consumers' reaction be to the 
fact that dried chicken soup mix is regulated by FDA?
    <bullet> What effects would there be, if any, on the way the 
subject products are marketed?
    The agencies seek as much information as possible about the impact 
of any changes in jurisdiction.

III. Registration

    Please submit your registration information (including name, title, 
firm name, address, telephone number, e-

[[Page 67494]]

mail address, and fax number) at least 5 workdays before the public 
meeting date. We encourage you to register online at http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/-comm/register.html. or to fax your registration 
directly to Marion V. Allen at 301-436-2605. We will accept 
registrations onsite. Space is limited and registration will be closed 
when maximum seating capacity is reached (250 people). If you need 
special accommodations due to a disability, please notify Marion V. 
Allen at least 7 workdays in advance.
    We encourage individuals or firms with relevant data or information 
to present such information at the meeting or in written comments to 
the record. If you would like to make oral comments at the meeting, 
please specify your interest in speaking when you register. The amount 
of time for each oral presentation will be limited to 5 minutes.

IV. Transcripts

    A transcript will be made of the proceedings of the meeting. You 
may request a copy of the meeting transcript in writing approximately 
30 working days after the public meeting at a cost of 10 cents per page 
from:
    FDA: FDA's Freedom of Information Office (HFI-35), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, rm. 12A-16, Rockville, MD 20857; or
    FSIS: FSIS, Freedom of Information Office, USDA, 1400 Independence 
Ave., SW., Room 1140 South Building, Washington, DC 20250.
    The transcript of the public meeting and all comments submitted 
will be available for public examination at the Agencies' Docket 
Offices (see ADDRESSES for locations and hours).

V. Comments

    In addition to presenting oral comments at the public meeting, 
interested persons may submit written or electronic comments on the 
subject of this meeting and Federal Register notice to a joint agency 
docket housed at FSIS.
    FSIS: Submit comments by any of the following methods: Mail, 
including floppy disks or CD-ROMs, and hand- or courier-delivered 
items.
    Comments are to be identified by the Docket No. 05-013N. All 
comments submitted in response to this notice will be available for 
public inspection in the Agencies' Docket offices and web sites. [See 
ADDRESSES section for location and hours].

Additional Public Notification

    Public awareness of all segments of rulemaking and policy 
development is important. Consequently, in an effort to ensure that the 
public and in particular minorities, women, and persons with 
disabilities, are aware of this notice, FSIS will announce it on-line 
through the FSIS Web page located at http://www.fsis.usda.gov/regulations/2005_Notices_Index/index.asp.
    FSIS also will make copies of this Federal Register publication 
available through the FSIS Constituent Update, which is used to provide 
information regarding FSIS policies, procedures, regulations, Federal 
Register notices, FSIS public meetings, recalls, and other types of 
information that could affect or would be of interest to our 
constituents and stakeholders. The update is communicated via Listserv, 
a free e-mail subscription service consisting of industry, trade, and 
farm groups, consumer interest groups, allied health professionals, 
scientific professionals, and other individuals who have requested to 
be included. The update also is available on the FSIS web page. Through 
Listserv and the web page, FSIS is able to provide information to a 
much broader, more diverse audience.
    In addition, FSIS offers an e-mail subscription service which 
provides an automatic and customized notification when popular pages 
are updated, including Federal Register publications and related 
documents. This service is available at http://www.fsis.usda.gov/news_and_events/email_subscription/ and allows FSIS customers to sign up 
for subscription options across eight categories. Options range from 
recalls to export information to regulations, directives and notices.
    Customers can add or delete subscriptions themselves and have the 
option to password protect their account.

    Done in Washington DC on: November 2, 2005.
Jeffrey E. Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy, Food and Drug Administration.
Sean Altekruse,
Deputy Executive Associate Administrator, OPPED, Food Safety Inspection 
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-22123 Filed 11-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-DM-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>