alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5408 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5408

  To amend title 18, United States Code, to change the state of mind 
    requirement for certain identity theft offenses, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 2010

  Mr. Goodlatte (for himself, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Smith of Texas, and Mr. 
   Putnam) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 18, United States Code, to change the state of mind 
    requirement for certain identity theft offenses, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Identity Theft Improvement Act of 
2010''.

SEC. 2. STATE OF MIND REQUIREMENT FOR IDENTITY THEFT AND AGGRAVATED 
              IDENTITY THEFT.

    Section 1028 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(j) State of Mind Proof Requirement.--In a prosecution under 
subsection (a)(7) or under section 1028A(a), the Government need not 
prove that the defendant knew the means of identification was of 
another person.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application. 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2005-22741.                 

*Date Filed:*                     October 17, 2005.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*                     TC23/123 Passenger Tariff Coordinating Conferences. Geneva and Teleconference, 26-28 September 2005. TC23/123 Europe-South East Asia Expedited Resolution 002ap. Intended effective date: 15 December 2005.                 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2005-22743.                 

*Date Filed:*                     October 17, 2005.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*                     TC23/123 Passenger Tariff Coordinating Conferences. Geneva and Teleconference, 26-28 September 2005. TC23/123 Europe-South East Asia Expedited Resolution 002ap. Intended effective date: 15 December 2005.                 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2005-22744.                 

*Date Filed:*                     October 17, 2005.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*                     MAIL VOTE NUMBER S 083. RP 724c Notice of Liability Limitations—Neutral Air. Carrier Liability for Passengers and their Baggage—EC. Regulation 889/2002. Intended effective date: 1 November 2005.                 

Renee V. Wright, 

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 05-22021 Filed 11-3-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5638 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5638

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the qualifying 
                    advanced energy project credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 2010

  Mr. Sestak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the qualifying 
                    advanced energy project credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Manufacturing and Energy Enhancement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE ADVANCED ENERGY PROJECT CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (B) of section 48C(d)(1) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``$2,300,000,000'' 
and inserting ``$7,300,000,000''.
    (b) Extension of Application Deadline.--Subparagraph (A) of section 
48(C)(d)(2) of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following 
new sentence: ``The application referred to in the preceding sentence 
shall be treated as timely made if submitted not later than 6 months 
after the date of the enactment of this sentence.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal executive officer of Xerium Technologies, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that, to his knowledge:

1) the Companys Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Companys Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Stephen R. LightStephen R. LightPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


May 8, 2008
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Wanis KOYOMEJIAN, aka David Cohen, David, Joseph Milano, Loco, Abu Hadid, Abu Simon and Joseph, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 02-50248.

D.C. No. CR-89-00189-CBM-01.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 11, 2005.

Ronald L. Cheng, Daniel A. Saunders, USLA—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gretchen Fusilier, Carlsbad, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BRUNETTI, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The memorandum filed under seal March 9, 2005, is unsealed and made a part of the public record.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Presidential Documents 67335 

Proclamation 7954 of November 2, 2005 

National Hospice Month, 2005 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

The great strength of America lies in the hearts and souls of our citizens. 

During National Hospice Month, we recognize hospice caregivers who are 

building a more compassionate society, where life is valued and those in 

need can count on the love and support of others. We also recognize the 

courage and strength of terminally ill patients and their families. 

When we help those who hurt and those in pain, we become part of 

our Nation’s armies of compassion. Hospice programs provide an option 

for individuals with terminal illnesses to be cared for as they choose in 

their final days, often in their own homes and surrounded by the love 

of their families. The doctors, nurses, counselors, volunteers, and others 

who provide hospice care throughout our country bring comfort to those 

most in need every day, treating terminally ill patients with the dignity 

and respect they deserve. By dedicating themselves to the care of those 

approaching the end of life, they demonstrate great love. 

The compassion reflected in hospice care is one of the reasons America 

has the best health care system in the world. Our whole Nation is grateful 

for the good work of our dedicated medical professionals and hospice caregivers. By taking the time to care for others, they are making America 

a better place. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim November 2005 as National 

Hospice Month. I encourage all our citizens to observe this month with 

appropriate programs and activities. I also ask Americans to recognize our 

health careprofessionals and volunteers for their contributions to helping 

those facing terminal illness receive quality care. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this second day 

of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth. 

W 

[FR Doc. 05–22203 

Filed 11–3–05; 10:58 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5652 

To direct the Federal Trade Commission to prescribe rules prohibiting 

deceptive advertising of abortion services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 30, 2010 

Mrs. MALONEY (for herself, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. FARR, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. BALDWIN, 

Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, 

and Mr. KUCINICH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To direct the Federal Trade Commission to prescribe rules 

prohibiting deceptive advertising of abortion services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Deceptive Adver5 tising for Women’s Services Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF DECEPTIVE ADVERTISING OF 

7 ABORTION SERVICES. 

8 (a) CONDUCT PROHIBITED.—Not later than 180 

9 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5652 IH

1 Trade Commission shall promulgate rules to prohibit, as 

2 an unfair and deceptive act or practice, any person from 

3 advertising with the intent to deceptively create the im4 pression that such person is a provider of abortion services 

5 if such person does not provide abortion services. 

6 (b) ENFORCEMENT.—The Federal Trade Commis7 sion shall enforce the rules required under subsection (a) 

8 as if a violation of such rules were a violation of section 

9 5(a)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 

10 45(a)(1)). The Commission shall enforce such rules in the 

11 same manner and by the same means, powers, and duties 

12 as though all applicable terms and provisions of the Fed13 eral Trade Commission Act were incorporated into and 

14 made a part of this Act. 

15 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

16 For purposes of the rules prescribed under section 

17 2, the following definitions apply: 

18 (1) ADVERTISE.—The term ‘‘advertise’’ means 

19 offering of goods or services to the public, regardless 

20 of whether such goods or services are offered for 

21 payment or result in a profit. 

22 (2) ABORTION SERVICES.—The term ‘‘abortion 

23 services’’ means providing surgical and non-surgical 

24 procedures to terminate a pregnancy, or providing 

25 referrals for such procedures. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5652 IH

1 (3) PERSON.—The term ‘‘person’’ has the 

2 meaning given such term in section 551(2) of title 

3 5, United States Code. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 10099 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v.
GARLAND SCOTT JOHNSON , Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:14 -CR- 170 -1

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Garland Scott Johnson pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm and was sentenced to 78 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. He argues that the district court erred in applying the crime-of- violence enhancement in U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) based on his prior Texas conviction for burglary of a habitation.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 19, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-10099 Document: 00513958243 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/19/2017No. 16

- 10099

2 More specifically, Johnson argues that Texas Penal Code § 30.02(a) is not divisible. We rejected this argument in United States v. Uribe , 838 F.3d 667, 670

- 71 (5 th Cir. 2016) , cert. denied , 2017 WL 661924 (Mar. 20, 2017) (No.
16

- 7969)

. Johnson also argues that § 30.02(a) does not constitute generic burglary of a dwelling because it encompasses the burglary of certain vehicles and structures appurtenant to said vehicles. We rejected this argument under plain error review in United States v. Garcia -Mendez , 420 F.3d 454, 456

- 57 (5th Cir. 2005), and recently followed that holding in analyzing a similar Tennessee statute in United States v. Castro -Alfonso , 841 F.3d 292, 297

- 98 (5th Cir. 2016).
T he district court did not err in applying the crime -of-violence enhancement because Johnson was convicted of violating § 30.02(a)(1) by entering the victim ’ s habitation with the intent to commit theft, which constitutes generic burglary of a dwelling. See Uribe , 838 F.3d at 671 ; U.S.S.G. §§ 2K2.1, comment. (n.1), 4B1.2, comment. (n.1) (2015). Moreover, any error was harmless because the district court stated that, even if it incorrectly calculated the guidelines range, it would impose the same sentence based upon its consideration of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, particularly Johnson’s extensive criminal history. See Castro-Alfonso , 841 F.3d at 298

- 99. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 16-10099 Document: 00513958243 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/19/2017
# L_2009187EN.01000501.xml

| 18.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 187/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 187/5

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2007/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on payment services in the internal market amending Directives 97/7/EC, 2002/65/EC, 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 97/5/EC

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 319 of 5 December 2007
  )

On page 26, Article 51(1), first sentence:

for:

‘Where the payment service user is not a consumer, the parties may agree that Article 52(1), the second subparagraph of Article 54(2), and Articles 59, 61, 62, 63, 66 and 75 shall not apply in whole or in part.’,

read:

‘Where the payment service user is not a consumer, the parties may agree that Article 52(1), Article 54(3), and Articles 59, 61, 62, 63, 66 and 75 shall not apply in whole or in part.’;

on page 34, Article 88(2), second sentence:

for:

‘However, they shall notify the competent authorities of the home Member State of these activities by 25 December 2007.’,

read:

‘However, they shall notify the competent authorities of the home Member State of these activities by 25 December 2009.’.

---
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

In the Matter of E.S., widow of P.S., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, NORTH 

ISLAND NAVAL BASE, Coronado, Co, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket Nos. 20-0215 & 21-1400

Issued: October 27, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Steven E. Brown, Esq. for the appellant

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER GRANTING FEE PETITION

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

Counsel for appellant has filed a fee petition in the amount $9,125.50.1 The requested fees 

pertain to services performed before the Board in the two above-referenced appeals. The Board 

notes that all petitions for approval of fees for representatives’ services are considered under the 

Board’s statutory authority found at section 8127 of the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act2

(FECA) and under its Rules of Procedure found at 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e).3

As required by the Board’s regulations, appellant has been afforded written notice of the 

fee requested and provided an opportunity to comment on the fee petition.4 No response was 

received.

1 FECA (5 U.S.C. § 8127(b)) and the implementing regulations (20 C.F.R. § 501.9) require the Board to review 

each fee petition on its own merits and with regard to the unique facts and issues of each appeal. 

2

5 U.S.C. § 8127.

3

20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e).

4

Id. 
2

The Board has reviewed the fee petition and finds it is in compliance with the Board’s 

Rules of Procedure.

5

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THATthe fee petition in the amount of $9,125.50 is granted.

Issued: October 27, 2023

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

5

Id.
#### MARTIN v. SERVICE CO.

No. 31 PC.

Case below: 17 N.C. App. 359.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 April 1973.
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 Grey Wolf, Inc.
List of Subsidiaries
 State or Jurisdiction of FormationGrey Wolf Drilling Company L.P.
    
    TexasGrey Wolf LLC
    
    LouisianaGrey Wolf Holdings Company
    
    NevadaMurco Drilling Corp.
    
    DelawareGrey Wolf International, Inc.
    
    TexasGrey Wolf Drilling International, Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsGrey Wolf Drilling de Venezuela
    
    VenezuelaDrillers Inc., DI de Venezuela
    
    VenezuelaGrey Wolf Mexico Holdings LLC
    
    NevadaGrey Wolf International de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoServicios Grey Wolf, S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoDI/Perfensa, Inc.
    
    TexasPerforaciones Andinas, S.A.
    
    PanamaDI Energy, Inc.
    
    Texas
# AMENDMENT TOSTOCK OPTION AGREEMENT(S)

WHEREAS,
GLOBAL NATURAL RESOURCES INC. ("Global") has previously adopted the GLOBAL NATURAL
RESOURCES INC. KEY EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN (1989) and the GLOBAL NATURAL RESOURCES
INC. 1992 STOCK OPTION PLAN (collectively, the "Global Option Plans"); and

WHEREAS,
Section 3.3 of the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger) by and
among Seagull Energy Corporation (Seagull), GNR Merger Corporation
and Global Natural Resources Inc. dated as of July 22, 1996 (the Merger
Agreement) provides that options outstanding under the Global Option Plans
(the Global Options) shall be assumed by Seagull and become options
to purchase Seagull common stock in accordance with the provisions thereof; and

WHEREAS,
in conjunction with the Merger, Seagull agreed to adopt a policy (the
Policy) of vesting and extending the exercise period of Global
Options granted to Retained Employees (as such term is defined in the Merger
Agreement) who terminate employment with Global or Seagull on or before the
second anniversary of the Effective Time (as such term is defined in the Merger
Agreement); and

WHEREAS,
certain nonstatutory stock options (the Options) have heretofore
been granted to the undersigned employee of Global, who is subject to the Policy
(the Employee), that are currently outstanding under the Global
Option Plans, each of such Options being listed on the schedule attached hereto
and evidenced by a Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement (the
Agreements); and

WHEREAS,
the Employees employment with the Company has been terminated and Seagull
desires to amend the Agreements in certain respects;

NOW,
THEREFORE, the Agreements shall be amended as follows, effective as of
_______________ (Employees employment termination date):

1.
The vesting schedule contained in the Agreements shall be waived and all Options
outstanding under such Agreements shall be exercisable in full.

2.
Notwithstanding any provision in the Agreements to the contrary, all Options
shall continue to be exercisable by the Employee, his estate or the person who
acquires such Options by will or the laws of descent and distribution, at any
time on or before the first anniversary of Employees employment
termination date.

3.
As amended hereby, the Agreements are specifically ratified and reaffirmed.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Seagull has caused this amendment to be duly executed by
one of its officers thereunto duly authorized, and the Employee has executed
this amendment, effective as of ________________ (Employees employment
termination date).

SEAGULL ENERGY
CORPORATION

By
_______________________________________      Employee

EMPLOYEE NAME:
___________________________________

|DATES OF STOCK | TYPE OF | 
|-------------- | ------- | 
|
|              
|              
|              
|              
|