alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5672 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5672

  To protect the use of traditional hunting and fishing equipment on 
 Federal lands and to prevent unnecessary and unwarranted restrictions 
      on the implements and equipment used by hunting and fishing 
                              communities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 2010

 Mr. Broun of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Boren, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. 
Altmire, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Childers, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Rehberg, 
  Mr. Ross, and Mr. Scalise) introduced the following bill; which was 
referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the 
Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by 
the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To protect the use of traditional hunting and fishing equipment on 
 Federal lands and to prevent unnecessary and unwarranted restrictions 
      on the implements and equipment used by hunting and fishing 
                              communities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS.

    (a) Limitation.--Except as provided by subsection (b), no Federal 
funds appropriated or made available to the Department of the Interior 
or the Department of Agriculture, and any of their agencies or bureaus, 
may be used to prohibit, limit, or control, based on material 
composition, the type of firearm ammunition or fishing tackle used on 
Federal lands managed by the Department of the Interior or the 
Department of Agriculture.
    (b) Exceptions.--Nothing in section 1 shall affect the use of 
Federal funds to continue to prohibit, limit or control, based on 
material composition, the type of firearm ammunition or fishing tackle 
used for hunting and fishing--
            (1) to the extent that a specific regulation is in effect 
        on the date of the enactment of this Act; or
            (2) if the best scientific evidence available demonstrates 
        that the material composition of the ammunition or fishing 
        tackle to be prohibited, limited, or controlled is having or is 
        likely to have a substantially detrimental effect on the health 
        of a local fish or wildlife population.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit No. 99.1


Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Journal Communications, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based
on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter ended March 23, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Steven J. Smith
---------------------------
Steven J. Smith
May 6, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Journal Communications, Inc. and will be retained by Journal
Communications, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, William I. Miller, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Irwin FinancialCorporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
        a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
        b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
        c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
        a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
        b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.                         /s/ William I. Miller   WILLIAM I. MILLER   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer   
Date: October 29, 2004
#### IDA MAY JANDA, BY HER NEXT FRIEND, IDA ROBBINS, APPELLANT, v. HAROLD CASWELL, RESPONDENT. IDA ROBBINS, APPELLANT, v. HAROLD CASWELL, RESPONDENT.

Submitted October 16, 1931

Decided January 20, 1932.

Before Justices Campbell, Lloyd and Bodine.

For the appellants, *Herbert J. Koehler*and *Raymond Saltzman.*

For the respondent, *Walter 8. Keown*and *George D. Rothermel.*

Pee Cubiam.

These cases were tried together in the court below and resulted in verdicts for the defendant by direction of the learned trial judge. The plaintiffs appeal and urge as cause for reversal that there was error in this judicial ruling.

The actions were to recover damages for personal injuries received in a collision between an automobile in which plaintiffs were riding and an automobile of the defendant. The proofs showed that the plaintiffs were driving northward on ‘Marlton pike toward Camden, intending to cross the Crescent Boulevard which it intersects at right angles. When the driver of the car reached the southerly edge of the boulevard Tie stopped and waited until several cars had passed by; looked again, first to the left and saw an automobile about *124one square away; looked to the right and saw defendant’s car about two squares away. He then proceeded to cross. When half way across he observed defendant’s car still a square distant. When he reached within a foot or two of the northerly side of the boulevard his car was struck in the rear right side by defendant’s car.

On such proofs it was error to direct verdicts in favor of the defendant. There was ample proof that the defendant failed to observe the rights of the plaintiffs and that he was in consequence guilty of negligence.

The judgments are reversed.
Exhibit 12(a) ublic "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 **Exhibit 12. (a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF INCOME TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(millions, except ratios)
 
2000
 
1999
 
1998
 
1997
 
1996
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Charges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest and amortization of debt discount
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
and expense on all indebtedness
 
$1,248 
 
$1,268 
 
$1,423 
 
$1,409 
 
$1,365 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Add interest element implicit in rentals
 
     136 
 
    133 
 
    144 
 
    147 
 
     121 
 
 
1,384 
 
1,401 
 
1,567 
 
1,556 
 
1,486 
Interest capitalized
 
        4 
 
        5 
 
       5 
 
       3 
 
       5 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total fixed charges **
rm-ex1016_67.htm



Exhibit 10.16

Description of Non-Employee Director Compensation Program

 

Regional Management Corp. (the “Company”) maintains a non-employee director compensation program pursuant to which, effective as of the date of the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders:


	
 
	
•
	
each non-employee director receives an annual cash retainer of $70,000 payable in quarterly installments ($95,000 in the case of the chair or lead independent director of the Board of Directors);





	
 
	
•
	
each member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and Risk Committee receives an additional annual cash retainer of $8,750 payable in quarterly installments ($17,500 in the case of the chair of each committee);





	
 
	
•
	
each non-employee director receives on an annual basis shares of restricted common stock of the Company with a value equal to $110,000 ($135,000 in the case of the chair or lead independent director of the Board of Directors); and





	
 
	
•
	
each member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and Risk Committee receives on an annual basis additional shares of restricted common stock of the Company with a value equal to $8,750 ($17,500 in the case of the chair of each committee).




The restricted stock awards are granted on the fifth business day following the date of the annual stockholders’ meeting at which directors are elected. The number of shares subject to each restricted stock award is determined by dividing the value of the award by the closing price per share of common stock on the grant date. The restricted stock award vests and becomes non-forfeitable as to 100% of the underlying shares on the earlier of the one-year anniversary of the grant date or the date of the next annual stockholders’ meeting (so long as the period between the date of the annual stockholders’ meeting related to the grant date and the date of the next annual stockholders’ meeting is not less than 50 weeks), subject to the director’s continued service from the grant date until the vesting date, or upon the earlier occurrence of the director’s termination of service as a director by reason of death or disability or upon a change in control of the Company. In the event of the director’s termination of service for any other reason, the director forfeits the restricted stock award immediately. The restricted stock award is subject to the terms and conditions of the Regional Management Corp. 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, and a restricted stock award agreement, the form of which was previously approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Non-employee directors are entitled to reimbursement for (i) travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incidental to attending Board meetings and other Board-related business events and (ii) reasonable expenses relating to director education.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6606

WILLIAM M. BRYSON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARK C. MOORE, Assistant United States

Attorney; REGAN PENDLETON, Assistant United

States Attorney; MARTIN BROWN, Special Agent

for the FBI; ROBERT SCOTT, Special Agent of

the FBI; JANET BROWN, Internal Revenue Service

Agent,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-02-82-6-20AK)

Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 24, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William M. Bryson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William M. Bryson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Bryson v. Moore, No. CA-02-82-6-20AK (D.S.C.

filed Feb. 22, 2002; entered Feb. 25, 2002). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of the Company for the six months ended
June 30, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000054291
<NAME> KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              17
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      294
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5
<INVENTORY>                                        565
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,010
<PP&E>                                           1,161
<DEPRECIATION>                                      46
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              552
<BONDS>                                          1,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               27
<PREFERRED>                                          2
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                          65
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,972
<SALES>                                          1,145
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,145
<CGS>                                              950
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      950
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   106
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    20
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  56
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     12
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (8)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 19
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        19
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>   This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
           from the Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations included in the
           Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and is
           qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1000

<S>                                                    <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          12-MOS
<CASH>                                                    60,806
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             32,257
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 423
<INVENTORY>                                               28,456
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         134,013
<PP&E>                                                   413,716
<DEPRECIATION>                                           277,570
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           284,286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     78,451
<BONDS>                                                  280,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                               25,000
<COMMON>                                                     405
<OTHER-SE>                                              (115,173)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             284,286
<SALES>                                                  245,138
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         245,138
<CGS>                                                    158,768
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            158,768
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          32,777
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             127
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        28,954
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (36,886)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               1,004
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (37,890)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (37,890)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0.00


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. HINES

No. 87 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 751.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 December 1976.
# L_2007241EN.01001301.xml

| 14.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 241/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 241/13

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1056/2007

of 13 September 2007

establishing that no award shall be made in the framework of the standing invitation to tender of white sugar provided for in Regulation (EC) No 38/2007

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 of 17 January 2007 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale for export of sugar held by the intervention agencies of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 of 17 January 2007 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale for export of sugar held by the intervention agencies of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 12 September 2007, it is appropriate to decide that no award shall be made for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 12 September 2007, it is appropriate to decide that no award shall be made for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 12 September 2007, for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 38/2007, no award shall be made.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 14 September 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 September 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 11, 18.1.2007, p. 4.

2

---
EXHIBIT 23.0--CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


         We consent to the  incorporation by reference on page 34 in this Annual
Report  (Form  10-K) of our report  dated  February  20,  1998  included  in the
1997 Annual Report to Shareholders of Inter-Tel, Incorporated.

         Our audit also included the financial  statement schedule of Inter-Tel,
Incorporated  listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is the  responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based upon our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered  in  relation  to the basic  financial  statements  taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

         We also  consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  Registration
Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  33-58161),  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-3  No.
33-61437),  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  333-01735),   Registration
Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  333-12433),  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-3 No.
333-39221),   Registration  Statement  (Form  S-8  No.  2-94805),   Registration
Statement  (Form  S-8  No.  33-40353),  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-8  No.
33-73620) and in Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No.  333-41197) of our report
dated February 20, 1998, with respect to the consolidated  financial  statements
incorporated  herein by  reference  and our  report  included  in the  preceding
paragraph  with respect to the  financial  statement  schedule  included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Inter-Tel, Incorporated.



Phoenix, Arizona                            /S/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP
March 27, 1998
No. 1274, Misc.

Petitioner *pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall,. Harold H. Greene*and *Joseph A..Barry*for the United States et al.

Reported below: — F. 2d —.

#### Bynum *v.*United States et al.

C. A; 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.