alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 207 (Thursday, October 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 62010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21446]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 10203 and <greek-i> 10204]


Texas Disaster Number TX-00066

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Texas (FEMA-1606-DR), dated September 
24, 2005.
    Incident: Hurricane Rita.
    Incident Period: September 23, 2005, and continuing through October 
14, 2005.
    Effective Date: October 14, 2005.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: November 23, 2005.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: June 26, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, National Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 
Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 
6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Texas, dated September 24, 2005, is hereby 
amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 
September 23, 2005, and continuing through October 14, 2005.
All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 05-21446 Filed 10-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### BOGGAN JUNIOR McIVER v. WILLIAMSON POTEAT and DOUGLAS POTEAT.

(Filed 14 January, 1966.)

Appeal by defendants from *Latham, S. J.,*March 1965 Civil Session of ALAMANCE. ■ ■

Civil action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly proximately caused by the actionable negligence of Williamson Po-teat in operating an automobile owned by Douglas Poteat, as servant, agent, and employee of Douglas Poteat, and within the scope of his employment.

Defendants filed a joint answer in which they deny any negligence on their part, and as a further answer and defense conditionally plead plaintiff’s contributory negligence as a bar to recovery.

The following issues were submitted to the jury and answered as indicated:

*363“1. Was the plaintiff injured as a result of the negligence of the defendants, as alleged in the Complaint?

“ÁNSWER: Yes.

*“2.*If so, did the plaintiff by his own negligence contribute to his injuries, as alleged in the Answer?

“ANswer: No.

“3. What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover from the defendants?

“ANswer: $3,200.00.”

From a judgment upon the verdict defendants appealed.

*Sanders ■& Holt by Emerson T. Sanders and Clyde A. Wootton for defendant appellants.*

*Boss, Wood & Dodge by B. F. Wood for plaintiff appellee.*

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient to carry his case to the jury. The jury, under application of well-settled principles of law, resolved the issues of fact against defendants. While the appellants’ well-prepared brief presents contentions involving fine distinctions and close differentiations, a careful examination of their assignments of error discloses no feature requiring extended discussion. Neither prejudicial nor reversible error has been made to appear which would justify disturbing the verdict and judgment. “A new trial will not be granted for mere technical error which could not have affected the result, but only for error which is prejudicial or harmful.” 1 Strong’s N. C. Index, Appeal and Error, § 40. The verdict and judgment are upheld.

No error.
Exhibit 31(b)

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Anthony Christon, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Jaclyn, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
     controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
     that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
     annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.


Date: November 12, 2004

/s/ Anthony Christon
---------------------------------------------
Anthony Christon, Principal Financial Officer

                                       26
Exhibit
10.1.6









June 19,
2008







Steven
      Helmers, Esq.
            Christopher
      Reitz, Esq.Black
      Hills Corporation
            Aquila,
      Inc.625
      Ninth Street
            20
      West Ninth StreetRapid
      City, SD 57709
            Kansas
      City, MO 64105







Re:
            Partnership
      Interests Purchase Agreement and Asset Purchase Agreement (collectively,
      the "Agreements") by and among Aquila, Inc. ("Aquila"), Black Hills
      Corporation ("Black Hills"), Great Plains Energy Incorporated ("Great
      Plains") and Gregory Acquisition Corp.
  ("Gregory")




Dear
Steve and Chris:




Under the
terms of the Agreements, as modified by those certain letters dated as of June
29, 2007, August 31, 2007, September 28, 2007, November 30, 2007, January 30,
2008, February 28, 2008, March 28, 2008, April 28, 2008, and May 29, 2008, Black
Hills, Aquila and Great Plains are to attach schedules setting forth Retained
Agreements and Shared Agreements prior to June 20, 2008.  We recognize
that this deadline may be implausible and therefore propose extending the date
set forth under section 2.2(1) and 8.5(d) of the Agreements to June 27,
2008.





If you
are in agreement, please sign below on the attached signature page where
indicated and return a copy of this letter to me by fax or e-mail.








Very
      truly yours,
              Great
      Plains Energy IncorporatedBy:
      /s/ Mark G. English
              Name:
      Mark G. English
              Title:
      General Counsel











ACKNOWLEDGED,
CONSENTED TO, AND ACCEPTED BY:





BLACK
HILLS CORPORATION








By:  /s/
Steven J. Helmers





Name:   Steven
J. Helmers


Title:     Sr.
Vice President and General Counsel








AQUILA,
INC.








By:  /s/
Chris Reitz





Name:   Chris
Reitz


Title:     General
Counsel








GREGORY
ACQUISITION CORP.








By:  /s/
Mark G. English





Name:   Mark
G. English


Title:     Secretary
and Treasurer
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 40526 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. R O S A L IO G O M E Z -M A R T IN E Z , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 1: 08- C R - 1306- 1 B e fo r e K IN G , J O L L Y , a n d S O U T H W IC K , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M: * T h e F ederalP u bl i c D efen der app o inted t o represent R osal i o G om ezM art i n ez ha s m oved f or l eave to w i t h draw an d h as fi l ed a bri ef i n accor da n ce w i t h A n d er s v . Ca lif o rn ia , 386 U . S . 7 3 8 (1 9 6 7 ) . G om ez- M art i n ez ha s not f i l ed a respon se. O u r i n dep en den trevi ew of the rec ord an d coun sel ’ s bri ef di scl oses n o n on frivo l ou s is s u e fo r ap p ea l . A ccord i n gly, cou n sel’ s m oti on f or leav e to w i t hdr aw i s G RA N TE D , c o uns e li s e xc us e d f r o m f ur t he rr e s po ns ibi l i t i e s he r e i n, a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December

15, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,535
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,436
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,714
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,429
<PP&E>                                           3,121
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,123)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,548
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,993
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,895
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,548
<SALES>                                         51,230
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           25,520
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,826
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (26)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,318
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (204)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,114
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.80
        


</TABLE>
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: George Wood v. Matthew D. Wiggins, Jr.

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 00630

- CV

Trial court case number: 11

- CV

- 0336

Trial court: 405 th District Court of Galveston County

The motion for rehearing is denied

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Amparo Guerra

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Rivas

- Molloy and Guerra

.

Date: March 10, 2022
#### Grace Community Church *v.*Town of Bethel et al.

*Jerome A. Mayer*and *John W. Mauck,*pro hac vice, in support of the petition.

*Stephen C. Gallagher,*in opposition.

Decided May 17, 1993

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 765 (AC 11312), is denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 21

- 00349

- CV
IN RE Greg ABBOTT , in h is Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Texas , Relator Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Irene Rios , Justice Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 15, 2021
DIS MISSED AS MOOT
On August 20 , 202 1 , R elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which the only relief requested was to stay the tr ial court’s August 12, 2021 temporary restraining order (TRO)

. Relator separately sought emergency relief to stay the TRO pending resolution of the petition.
On S eptember 2, 2021, the TRO expired , and the trial court granted the real party in
interest’s request for a temporary injunction

. Because the only relief the petition sought was to stay the trial court’s TR O, which has expired, Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021

- CVK

- 001517

- D1 , styled City of Laredo v. Greg Abbott, in his official capacity as Governor of Texas , pending in the 49th Judicial District Court , Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Honorable Jos é A. L ó pez presiding.
H. R. 5502 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To amend the effective date of the gift card provisions of the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DELAY OF EFFECTIVE DATE. 

Title IV of the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and 

Disclosure Act, is amended by striking section 403 and inserting 

the following: 

‘‘SEC. 403. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided under subsection (b) 

of this section, this title and the amendments made by this title 

shall become effective 15 months after the date of enactment of 

this Act. 

‘‘(b) EXCEPTION.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a gift certificate, store 

gift card, or general-use prepaid card that was produced prior 

to April 1, 2010, the effective date of the disclosure requirements described in sections 915(b)(3) and (c)(2)(B) of the Electronic Funds Transfer Act shall be January 31, 2011, provided 

that an issuer of such a certificate or card shall— 

‘‘(A) comply with paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 

915(b) of such Act; 

‘‘(B) consider any such certificate or card for which 

funds expire to have no expiration date with respect to 

the underlying funds; 

‘‘(C) at a consumer’s request, replace such certificate 

or card that has funds remaining at no cost to the consumer; and 

‘‘(D) comply with the disclosure requirements of paragraph (2) of this subsection. 

‘‘(2) DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS.—The disclosure requirements of this subsection are met by providing notice to consumers, via in-store signage, messages during customer service 

calls, Web sites, and general advertising, that— 

‘‘(A) any such certificate or card for which funds expire 

shall be deemed to have no expiration date with respect 

to the underlying funds; 

‘‘(B) consumers holding such certificate or card shall 

have a right to a free replacement certificate or card that 

includes the packaging and materials, typically associated 

with such a certificate or card; and 
H. R. 5502—2 

‘‘(C) any dormancy fee, inactivity fee, or service fee 

for such certificates or cards that might otherwise be 

charged shall not be charged if such fees do not comply 

with section 915 of the Electronic Funds Transfer Act. 

‘‘(3) PERIOD FOR DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS.—The notice 

requirements in paragraph (2) of this subsection shall continue 

until January 31, 2013.’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Extension of Expanded Workplace Flexibilities

This message is intended for all Department of Labor Federal employees.

Dear Colleagues,

I am pleased to announce that DOL management and Union leadership have agreed to another extension of the

Expanded Workplace Flexibilities through September 30, 2021. Information on Expanded Workplace Flexibilities,

including frequently asked questions, can be found on LaborNet.

Questions regarding the flexibilities may be sent to 

Sincerely,

Sydney T. Rose | Chief Human Capital Officer

Last updated: March 23, 2021

LABORNET
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 199 (Monday, October 17, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20793]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-05-034]


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: International Trade Commission.

Time and Date: October 19, 2005 at 11 a.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters To Be Considered: 
1. Agenda for future meetings: none
2. Minutes
3. Ratification List
4. Inv. No. 731-TA-718 (Second Review)(Glycine from China)--briefing 
and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its 
determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce 
on or before October 31, 2005.)
5. Outstanding action jackets: none
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: October 11, 2005.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-20793 Filed 10-13-05; 11:07 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Executive Order on Protecting the Federal

Workforce

Dear DOL Colleagues,

This week, President Biden signed an executive order of particular relevance to protecting the federal workforce. In this

order, the President has directed all agencies to take steps to protect federal workers – including by requiring compliance

with CDC guidelines requiring the use of masks, physical distancing, and other public health measures. It also requires

agencies to report on their efforts to implement this order within 7 days of its signing. You can see the full text of the order

at this link.

The Department is pursuing efforts now to update our own COVID-19 protocols, and we will keep you apprised of that

effort. Tricia Smith and I have tasked OSHA and OASAM to work together on this important project. We will also be

meeting with leadership of our federal employee unions, and expect opportunities to hear from the Department’s

employees more broadly in the weeks and months ahead as we continue onboarding new leadership and continue

iterating our plans.

Al Stewart

Acting Secretary

U.S. Department of Labor

Posted: January 22, 2021

LABORNET
```

EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have issued our report dated January 27, 2005,  accompanying the consolidated  financial statements of First M &
F Corporation  included in this annual  report (Form 10-K) for the year ended  December 31, 2004. We consent to the
incorporation  by reference of said report in the  Registration  Statements  (No.  333-46590 and No.  333-76615) on
Form S-8 and the Registration Statement (No. 333-76611) on Form S-3D.

/s/ Shearer, Taylor & Co., P.A.

Shearer, Taylor & Co., P.A.
Ridgeland, Mississippi
March 15, 2005
```
#### In re MARCUS D.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Submitted on Briefs Nov. 13, 1990.

Decided Dec. 12, 1990.

Jane Andrews, Lewiston, for appellant.

Margaret H. Semple, Geoffrey Goodwin, Asst. Attys. Gen., Dept, of Human Services, Augusta, for appellee.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and WATHEN, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD, COLLINS and BRODY, JJ.

COLLINS, Justice.

The biological father of Marcus D. appeals from the judgment of the District Court (Lewiston, *Beliveau, J.)*terminating his parental rights pursuant to 22 M.R.S.A. § 4055(1)(B)(2) (Supp.1990). The sole issue on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the District Court’s order. We affirm the judgment.

On appeal, the District Court’s ruling must be sustained if it “could reasonably have been persuaded that the required factual findings [were] proved to be *highly probable”. In re John Joseph V.,*500 A.2d 628, 629 (Me.1985) (quoting *Taylor v. Commissioners of Mental Health & Mental Retardation,*481 A.2d 139, 153 (Me.1984)) (emphasis in original). The court determined that due to, among other things, the father’s repeated criminal activity culminating in his then current incarceration for armed robbery, his emotional and substance abuse problems that required extensive treatment into the future and his demonstrated lack of interest for Marcus during the years preceding his current prison time, it was highly probable that the father was unable to protect his son from jeopardy within a time reasonable calculated to meet Marcus’s needs. The court found further that Marcus was severely abused emotionally and physically before entering foster care at the age of 2, was beginning to heal and develop normally in his foster home, and it was in his best interests to secure his stability by terminating the rights of his birth parents. After a careful review, we conclude that the District Court had sufficient evidence from which it could rationally have found that the statutory requirements for termination of parental rights were satisfied clearly and convincingly. *See In re Merton R.,*545 A.2d 650, 651-52 (Me.1988).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio DELGADO-GALLEGOS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-50874.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided April 20, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*616Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Sergio Delgado-Gallegos raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.