alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                          29,224
<SECURITIES>                                     6,109
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,322
<ALLOWANCES>                                       521
<INVENTORY>                                      5,750
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,198
<PP&E>                                          25,776
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,094
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 240,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,393
<BONDS>                                          3,241
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           222
<OTHER-SE>                                     172,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   240,481
<SALES>                                         73,043
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,560
<CGS>                                           66,015
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,989
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,718
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   101
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 290
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,583
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,370
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,213
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,213
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        


</TABLE>
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1392 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct an assessment of the responsibilities, workload, and vacancy rates of suicide prevention coordinators of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2019 

Mr. SULLIVAN (for himself and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to 

conduct an assessment of the responsibilities, workload, 

and vacancy rates of suicide prevention coordinators of 

the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Support for Suicide 

5 Prevention Coordinators Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1392 IS

1 SEC. 2. COMPTROLLER GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF RESPON2 SIBILITIES, WORKLOAD, AND VACANCY 

3 RATES OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF4 FAIRS SUICIDE PREVENTION COORDINA5 TORS. 

6 (a) ASSESSMENT REQUIRED.— 

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of 

8 the United States shall conduct an assessment of the 

9 responsibilities, workload, training, and vacancy 

10 rates of suicide prevention coordinators of the De11 partment of Veterans Affairs. 

12 (2) ELEMENTS.—The assessment under para13 graph (1) shall include a determination of— 

14 (A) the extent to which the use and staff15 ing of suicide prevention coordinators varies be16 tween facilities of the Department; and 

17 (B) the extent to which the Secretary of 

18 Veterans Affairs provides oversight of suicide 

19 prevention coordinators. 

20 (b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than one year 

21 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comp22 troller General shall submit to the Committee on Veterans’ 

23 Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Veterans’ Af24 fairs of the House of Representatives a report containing 

25 the findings of the assessment required by subsection (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
818 A.2d 219

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner v. Harrison B. WILSON, III, Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG, No. 100

Sept. Term, 2002.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

March 7, 2003.

*ORDER*

This Court having considered the Joint Petition for Two-Year Suspension by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-722, it is this 7th day of March, 2003,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that Harrison B. Wilson, III, be, and he is hereby is, suspended by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for a period of two years, effective immediately, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Harrison B. Wilson, III from the register of attorneys in this Court and, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16 — 772(d), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.
#### STATE v. HENRY AUSTIN BEST.

(Filed 25 May, 1966.)

Appeal by defendant from *Bickett, J.,*November 1, 1965, Criminal Session of Dueham Superior Court.

In the Durham County Recorder’s Court, defendant pleaded guilty to a warrant charging him with intoxication in a designated *436public place in Durham, N. C. “this being his fourth offense of public drunkness *(sic)*within a period of 12 months, the said Henry Austin Best having been convicted on the 10-24-64, 11-24-64, 1-12-65 in Durham County Recorders Court.” Judgment, imposing a fine and costs, was pronounced. Defendant appealed.

Upon hearing *de novo*in superior court on said warrant, defendant pleaded guilty; and, upon said plea, the court pronounced judgment imposing a prison sentence of twelve months. Defendant gave notice of appeal. On account of defendant’s indigency, the court appointed M. Hugh Thompson, Esq., an attorney at law, to represent defendant in connection with his appeal to this Court.

*Attorney General Bruton and Deputy Attorney General*McGall*iard for the State.*

*M. Hugh Thompson for defendant appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The record on appeal consists of the record proper. Defendant’s counsel states he has “been unable to find anything in connection with the record proper which would entitle this defendant to relief by this Court.” He states further: “I . . . have talked with the defendant on several occasions in order to determine if there is any new evidence, and I find none.”

The judgment pronounced in the superior court is authorized by G.S. 14-335(12).

No error appearing on the face of the record proper, the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Moore, J., not sitting.
**Exhibit 10.9.1**

**AMENDMENT NO. 1**

**TO THE**

**UNIFIED WESTERN GROCERS, INC.**

**EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN**

Effective as of August 31, 1997, the definition of “Employee” in Section 1.2 of the Unified Western Grocers, Inc. Employee SavingsPlan (the “Plan”) is amended and restated to read as follows: 

“‘Employee’ shall mean every person classified bythe Company as a common law, hourly employee of the Company and any Affiliated Company that has adopted the Plan with the permission of the Board of Directors. With respect to persons employed in a United Grocers facility, ‘Employee’ shallmean every person classified by the Company as a common law, collectively bargained employee of such a facility (‘United Employee’). ‘Employee’ shall not include any person who is (i) employed by or through a leasing,temporary, or similar agency or company, or (ii) classified by the Company as a leased employee (‘Leased Employee’) of the Company or any such Affiliated Company. For this purpose, a Leased Employee is a person whose services areperformed under primary direction or control by the Company or any Affiliated Company on a substantially full time basis for a period of at least one year in accordance with Code Section 414(n)(2). If any person described in the precedingsentence is determined to be a common law employee of the Company by court decision or otherwise, such person shall nonetheless continue to be treated as not being an Employee.’ 

* * * 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Unified Western Grocers, Inc. has executed this Amendmentthis 16 day of April, 2002.
#### FRED L. TICHENOR, RESPONDENT, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, APPELLANT.

Submitted October 16, 1931

Decided January 20, 1932.

Before Justices Campbell, Lloyd and Bodine.

For the appellant, Quinn, *Parsons & Doremus.*

For the respondent, *Samuel Y. Hampton.*

Per Curiam.

Fo specification of determinations of the District Court with which the appellant is dissatisfied, as required by rule 145 of this court, is presented in the record brought before us in this case. There is, therefore, nothing before us for review.

The appeal is dismissed, with costs.
|                                                      |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|
| Exhibit 32(a), Form                        10-Q           |
| Kansas                        City Life Insurance Company |

**KANSAS CITY            LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY            SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**            Second Quarter 2007

The undersigned            certify that the registrant’s Form 10-Q report fully complies with the            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15            U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report fairly            represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations            of the registrant.
|                                                       |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/R. Philip                        Bixby                  |
|                                                            |
| R. Philip                        Bixby                     |
| President, Chief                        Executive Officer, |
| and Chairman of the                        Board           |
|                                                  |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/Tracy W.                        Knapp              |
|                                                       |
| Tracy W.                        Knapp                 |
| Senior Vice                        President, Finance |
| Date: July 30,                        2007            |

----
#### STATE v. IVEY

No. 126 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 524.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 31 January 1977.
Case 1:06-cv-14935-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14935-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14935-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14935-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14935-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14935-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14935-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14935-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14935-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14935-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14935-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14935-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14935-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

N OT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

U P APARTMENTS, LLC
, Appel lant,

v. Case No. 5D23

- 0234 LT Case No

. 2019

- CA

- 4475

- MA CRISTOBAL BALDERA, AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF M.B., A MINOR
, Appel lee. /

Opi nion filed June 2, 2023
Appeal f rom the Circuit Court for Duval County, Marianne L. Aho
, Judge.

Kur t T. Koehler
, of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Chad A. Barr, of Chad Barr Law, Altamonte Springs
, for Appellee.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

P ER CURIAM.
Appel lant appeals a final judgment. Appellee has filed a confession of
error. We accept the confession of error, reverse the judgment, and remand2 for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

S OUD, BOATWRIGHT and KILBANE
, JJ., concur.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

GERALDINE JONES, * No. 13-786V

* Special Master Christian J. Moran

Petitioner, *

v. * Filed: January 14, 2015

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; Trivalent influenza 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“flu”) vaccine; immune-mediated

* thrombocytopenic purpura (“ITP”).

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Kate Westad, Lommen Abdo, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Petitioner;

Lindsay Corliss, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION1

On January13, 2015, respondent filed a joint stipulation concerning the 

petition for compensation filed by Geraldine Jones on October 9, 2013. In her

petition, Ms. Jones alleged that the trivalent influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which is 

contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), and 

which she received on or about October 13, 2010, caused her to develop immunemediated thrombocytopenic purpura (“ITP”). Petitioner further alleges that she 

experienced the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petitioner 

represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for 

damages as a result of her condition.

Respondent denies that the flu immunization is the cause of petitioner’s 

alleged ITP, and/or any other injury.

1 The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 

2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), 

the party has 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other 

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special 

master will appear in the document posted on the website.

 
Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as 

“Appendix A.” The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as 

the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum of $85,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, 

Geraldine Jones. This amount represents compensation for all damages 

that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, 

the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 13-786V according to this decision 

and the attached stipulation.2

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Mary Holmes, at (202) 357-

6353.

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each 

party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal 

Claims judge.

2

 
Case 1:13-vv-00786-UNJ Document 39 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:13-vv-00786-UNJ Document 39 Filed 01/13/15 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:13-vv-00786-UNJ Document 39 Filed 01/13/15 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:13-vv-00786-UNJ Document 39 Filed 01/13/15 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:13-vv-00786-UNJ Document 39 Filed 01/13/15 Page 5 of 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          10,924
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,595
<INVENTORY>                                     37,245
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                92,727
<PP&E>                                          24,268
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,174
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 172,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,924
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,586
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   172,071
<SALES>                                        131,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               131,952
<CGS>                                           95,973
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,888
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    90
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,195
<INCOME-TAX>                                       965
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,230
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,230
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.74




</TABLE>
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

T.P., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

FAYETTEVILLE VA MEDICAL CENTER,

Fayetteville, NC, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-1180

Issued: September 28, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On September 19, 2023 appellant filed an appeal from a January 22, 2019 merit decision

of the office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 23-1180.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act.1 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance 

of OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the January 22, 2019 decision was July 21, 2019. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until September 19, 2023, more than 180 days after the

January 22, 2019 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 23-1180 is 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the 

date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.”
2

untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not 

explained his failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to 

establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP 

within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed 

as No. 23-1180, must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-1180 is dismissed.

Issued: September 28, 2023

Washington, DC

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id.

at § 501.6(d).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT .......... SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ...................................................... X 

IN RE: Fosarnas Products LiabiIity 

Litigation 1 :06-md-1789 (JFK) 

ORDER 

Tilts Document Re1art.s to: All Actions 

SEE ATTACHED 

Case 1:07-cv-03294-JFK Document 4 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03294-JFK Document 4 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### LIENTHALL v. GLASS

No. 109

Case below: 2 N.C. App. 65.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 October 1968.
#### STATE v. LEWIS

No. 162 PC.

Case below: 18 N.C. App. 681.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 August 1973. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal allowed 31 August 1973.
#### GUTHRIE v. RAY

No. 79 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 142.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 7 December 1976.
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 1 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 2 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 3 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 4 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 5 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 6 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 7 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 8 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 9 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 10 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 11 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 12 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 13 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 14 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 15 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 16 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 17 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 18 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 19 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 20 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 21 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 22 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 23 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 24 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 25 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 26 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 27 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 28 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 29 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 30 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 31 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 32 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 33 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 34 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 35 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 36 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 37 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 38 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-5 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 39 of 39