alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Cite as Zwick v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 2011-Ohio-1766.]

Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 

65 South Front Street, Third Floor 

Columbus, OH 43215 

614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 

www.cco.state.oh.us 

MICHAEL JAMES ZWICK 

 Plaintiff 

 v. 

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

 Defendant 

Case No. 2010-10939-AD 

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert 

ENTRY OF DISMISSAL

{¶ 1} On September 29, 2010, plaintiff, Michael Zwick, filed a complaint against 

defendant, Department of Transportation. Plaintiff asserts on September 16, 2010 at 

approximately 12:30 p.m., while traveling northbound on State Route 128 underneath 

the I-275/I-74 overpass his vehicle struck a series of metal plates causing damage. 

Plaintiff seeks reimbursement for tire damage in the amount of $141.83. The filing fee 

was paid. 

{¶ 2} On November 22, 2010, defendant filed a motion to dismiss. In support of 

the motion to dismiss, defendant stated in pertinent part: 

{¶ 3} “Duke Energy was working in this area by permit to relocate two aerial 

lines into two buried flex ducts along SR 128 under I-74. They were working on a utility 

relocation project and ODOT’s permit was issued on September 2, 2010. The permit 

has language that states ‘The permittee shall save harmless the State of Ohio and all of 

its representatives from all suits, actions, or claims of any character brought on account 
Case No. 2010-10939-AD - 2 - ENTRY

of any injuries or damages sustained by any person or property in consequence of any 

neglect or on account of any act or omission as a result of the issuance of this permit’ 

(See Exhibit A). This permit mentions that Duke Energy was doing work associated 

with ODOT Project HAM-74-7.76 but this project will not be sold until November 18, 

2010 and the utility company is doing the relocation work in advance of the construction 

project.” 

{¶ 4} Plaintiff has not responded to defendant’s motion to dismiss. 

{¶ 5} Defendant was not responsible for the work being performed at the site of 

plaintiff’s incident. Accordingly, defendant is not the appropriate party to sue. 

Therefore, defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED 

and the court shall absorb the court costs of this case in excess of the filing fee. 

 ________________________________ 

 DANIEL R. BORCHERT 

 Deputy Clerk 

Entry cc: 

Michael James Zwick Chester T. Lyman, Jr. 

8214 West Mill Street, Apt. 416 Department of Transportation 

Cleves, Ohio 45002 1980 West Broad Street 

 Columbus, Ohio 43223 

DRB/laa 

Filed 1/21/11 

Sent to S.C. reporter 4/8/11
EXHIBIT 31.2

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, John W. Swatek, certify that: 

 
| 1. | I have reviewed annual report on Form 10-K of Hanover Direct, Inc.; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

/s/ John W. Swatek

John W. Swatek

Senior Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

 

Date: February 21, 2006
#### STATE v. JOHNSON

No. 111 PC.

Case below: 18 N.C. App. 338.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 12 July 1973.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the Construction Advisory Board will be held on Tuesday November 15, 2005, at the Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Room 430, Washington, DC. The meeting will begin at 1 p.m. and end at 5 p.m.

The purpose of the Board is to provide advice to the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs regarding VA construction. The Board will make recommendations to the Secretary on the nature and scope of the Department's construction processes.

The meeting will be open to the public from 1 p.m. to 2 p.m., with an opportunity for public comments during that period. The Board will discuss its final recommendations to the Secretary. From 2 p.m. to 5 p.m., the Board will discuss selected personnel matters affecting the management of VA's construction program. To protect personal privacy and in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6), that portion of the meeting will be closed.

Members of the public may direct questions or submit written statements for review by the Board in advance of the meeting. Any member of the public wishing to make a brief oral presentation or to attend the meeting should contact Doug Belling, Designated Federal Officer, at the Office of Asset Enterprise Management (004B), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, or by telephone at (202) 273-6675.

Dated: October 27, 2005.

By Direction of the Secretary.

E. Philip Riggin,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-21891 Filed 11-2-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
# C_2007171EN.01000301.xml

| 24.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4637 — Sachsenfonds Holding/Eastmerchant/Nikko Principal Investments)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 171/02)

On 17 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4637. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4637. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
# Revoking Proclamation 7924

WHEREAS, the provisions of subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code, 40 U.S.C. 3141-3148, and the provisions of all other acts, Executive Orders, proclamations, rules, regulations, or other directives providing for the payment of wages, which provisions are dependent upon determinations by the Secretary of Labor under section 3142 of title 40, United States Code, were suspended by Proclamation 7924 of September 8, 2005, within specified geographic areas affected by Hurricane Katrina until otherwise provided;

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, acting under the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 202 of the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. 1622, do by this Proclamation revoke, effective November 8, 2005, Proclamation 7924 as to all contracts for which bids are opened or negotiations concluded on or after November 8, 2005.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this third day of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth.

[FR Doc. 05-22427

Billing code 3195-01-P
#### QUINN v. SUPERMARKET, INC.

No. 5 PC.

Case below: 6 N.C. App. 696.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 3 February 1970.
هل أنت محمي بموجب VEVRAA

إذا أجبت بـ "نعم" على أي من األسئلة الواردة في الفئات المذكورة أعاله، فقد تكون محمًيا بموجب VEVRAA.

قد تنطبق أكثر من فئة واحدة على محارب قديم واحد.

إذا لم تنطبق عليك أي من الفئات، فقد ال تكون من المحاربين القدماء المحميين.

هل أنا من المحاربين القدماء المحميين؟

يحظر قانون VEVRAA( قانون تسوية أوضاع المحاربين القدماء في فيتنام( الصادر عام 1974 بصيغته المعدلة )4212 § .C.S.U 38)

التمييز ضد المحاربين القدماء المحميين.

بموجب VEVRAA يمكن تصنيف المحاربين القدماء إلى "محارب قديم عاجز" أو "محارب قديم حديث التسريح" 

أو "محارب قديم في الخدمة الفعلية زمن الحرب أو حامل لشارة الحملة" أو "محارب قديم حاصل على وسام خدمة القوات المسلحة".

يرجى مالحظة أن هذه الصفحة توفر معلومات عامة وال تحل محل القانون واألنظمة الفعلية المتعلقة بالبرنامج الموصوف هنا.

† تواريخ فترات الحرب: الصراع الكوري 27 يونيو 31-1950 يناير ،1955 حقبة فيتنام 28 فبراير 7-1961 مايو 1975 للمحاربين القدماء الذين خدموا في 

جمهورية فيتنام أو 5 أغسطس 1964 - 7 مايو 1975 لجميع الحاالت األخرى، حرب الخليج الفارسي 2 أغسطس 1990 - حتى اآلن.

إذا لم يكن لديك نموذج -214DD، أو كانت لديك أسئلة إضافية حول فئة المحاربين القدماء الخاصة بك فيرجى االتصال بقسم شؤون المحاربين القدماء

على الرقم .1-800-827-1000

محارب قديم عاجز محارب قديم مسرح مؤخرا محارب قديم في الخدمة 

الفعلية زمن الحرب أو 

حامل لشارة الحملة

محارب قديم حاصل على 

وسام خدمة القوات 

المسلحة

 هل أنت من المحاربين

القدماء في الجيش 

األمريكي الذين يحق لهم

الحصول على تعويض 

)أو من يحق لهم الحصول 

على تعويض لوال استالم 

رواتب التقاعد العسكري( 

بموجب القوانين التي 

يديرها سكرتير شؤون 

المحاربين القدماء؟

أو

 هل تم تسريحك أو 

إعفاؤك من الخدمة الفعلية 

بسبب إعاقة ناتجة عن 

الخدمة؟

 هل تم تسريحك أو إعفاؤك

من الخدمة خالل السنوات 

الثالث الماضية؟

 هل كنت في الخدمة 

الفعلية خالل واحدة أو 

أكثر من فترات الحرب 

الموضحة في ) USC 38

101 §(؟ †

 هل كنت في الخدمة 

الفعلية مع أي حملة أو 

بعثة تم ترخيص شارة 

الحملة فيها بموجب 

القوانين التي تديرها 

وزارة الدفاع؟

 هل كنت في خدمة فعلية 

مع عملية عسكرية أمريكية 

ُمنحت وسام خدمة القوات

ا للالمسلحة وفق قرار ً

التنفيذي 12985

(61 FR 1209)

وهل حصلت على وسام 

خدمة القوات المسلحة؟

 إذا حصلت على وسام 

خدمة القوات المسلحة فهل 

هو مدرج في نموذج DD

214 الخاص بك؟

هل كنت في الخدمة الفعلية* 

في الجيش األمريكي؟

إذا أجبت بـ "نعم" على السؤالين أعاله، فتابع إلى األسئلة أدناه.

إذا أجبت بـ "ال" على أي من السؤالين، فقد ال يتم اعتبارك من المحاربين القدماء المحميين.

هل تم تسريحك أو إعفاؤك من 

الخدمة ألسباب غير التسريح 

الغير مشرف؟

مكتب برامج االمتثال

للعقود الفيدرالية

وزارة العمل األمريكية

2016 سبتمبر في المراجعة تمت 200 CONSTITUTION AVENUE NW | WASHINGTON, DC 20210 | tel: 1-800-397-6251 | TTY: 1-877-889-5627 | www.dol.gov/ofccp
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED, PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned executive officer of the registrant hereby certifies that this Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained herein fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Steven R. Lewis                  
|Steven R. Lewis                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: September 7, 2007
Exhibit
10.14


 


OKYO
PHARMA LIMITED


 


55
Park Lane London W1K 1NA


Tel:
+44 (0) 207 495 2379


 


Gabriele
Cerrone


21
Avenue de l’Annonciade


	Monaco 98000	28 April 2021




 


Dear
Gabriele,


 


Planwise
Group Limited and Panetta Partners Limited hold the following warrants in addition to the convertible loan notes (“CLNs”)
that they have agreed to convert as part of the plans of the Company to file a prospectus with the FCA to convert the vast majority of
the CLNs currently outstanding:


 


CLN
Warrants – 39,605,760 @ 0.4p Cost of exercise £158,423, which arise as a result of the conversion of the CLNs;


 


May
2020 warrants – 72,000,000 @ 0.55p Cost of exercise £396,000; and March 2020 warrants – 36,363,636 @ 1.35p Cost of
exercise £490,909.


Exercise
of these warrants would add 147,969,396 shares to the “denominator” and remove a significant percentage of all of the warrants
from the capital structure. The Board is aware that it would be advantageous to future fundraisings to have these dilutive instruments
exercised in full (in so far as is possible).


 


In
order to fund the exercise of the warrants it is proposed that you be paid a retrospective bonus of £490,909 for the financial
year ended 31/3/2020 and a bonus of £396,000 for the financial year ending 31/3/2021. In addition you will agree to waive all accrued
consultancy payments for the first quarter of the calendar year 2021 (i.e. from your effective date of appointment) and for the balance
of the current financial year (equal to £120,000 per annum) on the agreement and understanding that such bonuses and salary will
be immediately applied by the Company in paying up the exercise price for the warrants held by Planwise and Panetta (so that no cash
will actually change hands).


 


We
are awarding these bonuses on the basis of your co-invention of the use of Chemerin in the COVID-19 indication when you were not a director
or employee of the Company (now the subject of a patent application); your work in procuring, backing and completing the refinancing
the Company in 2020 and your actions in making new executive appointments and scientific advisory appointments to the Board with the
result that the Company now has a clear and accelerated path to the clinic.


 


You
also agree that you will not seek any bonus or option award during the 2021 remuneration review process.


 




    	-1-



     


    

 


After
you have had an opportunity to review this Agreement, please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments. To indicate
your acceptance of this Agreement, please sign and date this letter in the space provided below and return it to the Company.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	OKYO PHARMA LIMITED
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Willy Simon
	 	 	        (Signature)
	 	Name: 	Willy
    Simon
	 	Title:	Chair
    of the Remuneration Committee


 


	ACCEPTED
    AND AGREED:
	 	 
	GABRIELE
    CERRONE
	 	 
	FOR
    HIMSELF AND WITH THE CONSENT OF PLANWISE GROUP LIMITED AND PANETTA PARTNERS LIMITED
	 	 
	/s/
    Gabriele Cerrone	 
	   (Signature)	 
	 	 
	April
    29, 2021	 
	   Date	 


 




    	-2-
# L_2007340EN.01008501.xml

| 22.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 340/85 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 340/85

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1574/2007

of 21 December 2007

fixing the amount of private storage aid for certain fishery products in the 2008 fishing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 of 17 December 1999 on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2813/2000 of 21 December 2000 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 as regards the grant of private storage aid for certain fishery products (2), and in particular Article 1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The aid should not exceed the sum of technical and financial costs recorded in the Community during the fishing year proceeding the year in question. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The aid should not exceed the sum of technical and financial costs recorded in the Community during the fishing year proceeding the year in question.

| (2) | To discourage long-term storage, to shorten payment times and to reduce the burden of controls, private storage aid should be paid in one single instalment. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

To discourage long-term storage, to shorten payment times and to reduce the burden of controls, private storage aid should be paid in one single instalment.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the Management Committee for Fishery Products, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the Management Committee for Fishery Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 2008 fishing year the amount of private storage aid, referred to in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000, for the products listed in Annex II to that Regulation shall be as follows:

| — | first month: EUR 210 per tonne, |
| --- | --- |

—

first month: EUR 210 per tonne,

| — | second month: EUR 0 per tonne. |
| --- | --- |

—

second month: EUR 0 per tonne.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 January 2008.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 December 2007.

For the Commission

Joe BORG

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 17, 21.1.2000, p. 22. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1759/2006 (OJ L 335, 1.12.2006, p. 3).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 326, 22.12.2000, p. 30.

2

---
#### Valentino RAMOS-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-71654, [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 4, 2005.**

Decided April 11, 2005.

Kevin A. Bove, Attorney at Law, Escondido, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration *&*Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Margaret Perry, Audrey B. Hemesath, Office of Immigration Litigation Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*873Before KOZINSE3, HAWKINS, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM***

Valentino Ramos-Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. We have partial jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review constitutional claims de novo, *see Tovar-Landin v. Ashcroft,*361 F.3d 1164, 1166 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not err in its interpretation of the exceptional and extremely unusual hardship standard found in 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b). There was therefore no violation of Ramos-Hernandez’s due process rights. *See Ramirez-Perez v. Ashcroft,*336 F.3d 1001, 1003 (9th Cir.2003).

Additionally, contrary to Ramos-Hernandez’s contention, we lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that he failed to demonstrate exceptional and extremely unusual hardship. *See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 891-92 (9th Cir.2003).

The voluntary departure period was stayed, and that stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate. *See Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32.3





Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350





Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wisconsin Power and Light Company (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ William D. Harvey


William D. Harvey


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Patricia L. Kampling


Patricia L. Kampling


Vice President-Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer





October 30, 2009