69424 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 16, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We have determined that this AD will 

not have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. This AD will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

(3) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this AD and placed it in the AD docket. 

See the ADDRESSES section for a location 

to examine the regulatory evaluation. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13 

by adding the following new 

airworthiness directive (AD): 

2005–23–16 Boeing: Amendment 39–14374. 

Docket No. FAA–2005–21714; 

Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–065–AD. 

Effective Date 

(a) This AD becomes effective December 

21, 2005. 

Affected ADs 

(b) None. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 737–

600, –700, –700C, –800, and –900 series 

airplanes; certificated in any category; as 

identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 737–28–

1209, dated February 17, 2005. 

Unsafe Condition 

(d) This AD was prompted by the results 

of fuel system reviews conducted by the 

manufacturer. We are issuing this AD to 

prevent chafed wire bundles near the center 

fuel tank, which could cause electrical arcing 

through the tank wall and ignition of fuel 

vapor in the fuel tank, and result in a fuel 

tank explosion. 

Compliance 

(e) You are responsible for having the 

actions required by this AD performed within 

the compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

Modification 

(f) Within 60 months after the effective 

date of this AD: Modify the wire bundles 

located below the passenger compartment, 

above the center fuel tank, aft of station 

(STA) 540 through STA 601 inclusive, at 

right buttock line and left buttock line 24.82 

in accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737–

28–1209, dated February 17, 2005. Lacing 

tape part number (P/N) BMS 13–54, having 

Type I, Class 2, Finish C, Grade D, shown in 

sheet 3 of Figures 5 and 6 of the 

Accomplishment Instructions of the service 

bulletin, does not exist; the correct material 

is BMS 13–54, having Type II, Class 1, Finish 

D/C, Grade D, white, or Type III, Class 1, 

Finish C, Grade D, white, any size. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(g)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in 

accordance with the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. 

(2) Before using any AMOC approved in 

accordance with 14 CFR 39.19 on any 

airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify 

the appropriate principal inspector in the 

FAA Flight Standards Certificate Holding 

District Office. 

Material Incorporated by Reference 

(h) You must use Boeing Service Bulletin 

737–28–1209, dated February 17, 2005, to 

perform the actions that are required by this 

AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The 

Director of the Federal Register approved the 

incorporation by reference of this document 

in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. Contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, 

Washington 98124–2207, for a copy of this 

service information. You may review copies 

at the Docket Management Facility, U.S. 

Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh 

Street, SW., room PL–401, Nassif Building, 

Washington, DC; on the Internet at http:// 

dms.dot.gov; or at the National Archives and 

Records Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the NARA, call (202) 741–6030, 

or go to http://www.archives.gov/ 

federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ 

ibr_locations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

November 7, 2005. 

Kalene C. Yanamura, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 05–22593 Filed 11–15–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2004–19539; Directorate 

Identifier 2004–NM–06–AD; Amendment 39–

14375; AD 2005–23–17] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing 

Model 737 Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

Boeing Model 737 airplanes. This AD 

requires, for certain airplanes, a onetime detailed inspection for interference 

between a clamp assembly and the 

wires behind the P15 refuel panel, and 

corrective actions if necessary. For 

certain other airplanes, this AD requires 

a one-time detailed inspection for 

discrepancies of the wires behind the 

P15 refuel panel; and corrective and 

related investigative actions if 

necessary. This AD is prompted by 

evidence of chafed wiring behind the 

P15 refuel panel and arcing to the back 

of the P15 refuel panel and adjacent 

wing structure. We are issuing this AD 

to detect and correct chafing of the 

wiring behind the P15 refuel panel, 

which could lead to arcing and fire with 

consequent airplane damage and injury 

to refueling personnel. 

DATES: This AD becomes effective 

December 21, 2005. 

The incorporation by reference of 

certain publications listed in the AD is 

approved by the Director of the Federal 

Register as of December 21, 2005. 

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD 

docket on the Internet at http:// 

dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility, U.S. Department 

of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street 

SW., Nassif Building, room PL–401, 

Washington, DC. 

Contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, 

Washington 98124–2207, for service 

information identified in this AD. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sherry Vevea, Aerospace Engineer, 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 16, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 69425 

Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA, 

Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington 98055–4056; telephone 

(425) 917–6514; fax (425) 917–6590. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Examining the Docket 

You may examine the airworthiness 

directive (AD) docket on the Internet at 

http://dms.dot.gov or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility office 

between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

The Docket Management Facility office 

(telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on 

the plaza level of the Nassif Building at 

the street address stated in the 

ADDRESSES section. 

Discussion 

The FAA issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 to include an AD that would 

apply to certain Boeing Model 737 

airplanes. That NPRM was published in 

the Federal Register on November 5, 

2004 (69 FR 64515). That NPRM 

proposed to require, for certain 

airplanes, a one-time detailed 

inspection for interference between a 

clamp assembly and the wires behind 

the P15 refuel panel, and corrective 

actions if necessary. For certain other 

airplanes, that NPRM proposed to 

require a one-time detailed inspection 

for discrepancies of the wires behind 

the P15 refuel panel; and corrective and 

related investigative actions if 

necessary. 

Explanation of Service Information 

Revision 

Since the issuance of the NPRM, the 

manufacturer has revised the service 

bulletins referenced in this AD. We have 

reviewed Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletins 737–28–1193 and 

737–28–1200, both Revision 1, both 

dated July 28, 2005. We have 

determined that these revised service 

bulletins will neither increase the 

economic burden on any operator nor 

increase the scope of the AD and should 

be referenced as the appropriate sources 

of service information for accomplishing 

the requirements of the AD. Therefore, 

in the AD, we have revised paragraph (f) 

to specify the revised service bulletins, 

inserted new paragraph (g) to give credit 

for using the original issues of the 

service bulletins (which were referenced 

as the appropriate sources of service 

information for accomplishing the 

requirements of the AD) to accomplish 

the required actions before the effective 

date of the AD, and re-identified 

existing paragraph (g) to (h). 

Comments 

We provided the public the 

opportunity to participate in the 

development of this AD. We have 

considered the comments that have 

been submitted on the NPRM. 

Request To Revise Inspection and 

Corrective Action 

One commenter requests that 

paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of the NPRM be 

changed in the AD to read ‘‘For Group 

2 airplanes only as defined in Service 

Bulletin 737–28–1200: Perform a onetime detailed inspection for 

discrepancies of the wires in wire 

bundle W0024 to connector D04578P on 

the back of the P15 refuel panel and do 

any applicable corrective actions before 

further flight.’’ The commenter states 

this change will provide appropriate 

operator guidance by tying the detailed 

inspection of Group 2 airplanes to the 

applicable service bulletin. 

We partially agree. Paragraph (f)(2) of 

the AD clearly states that all applicable 

actions listed in paragraphs (f)(2)(i) and 

(f)(2)(ii) of this AD must be done in 

accordance with Boeing Special 

Attention Service Bulletin 737–28–

1200, Revision 1, dated July 28, 2005. 

However, for clarity, as paragraph 

(f)(2)(i) of the NPRM refers to ‘‘Service 

Bulletin 737–28–1200,’’ we have revised 

paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of the AD to also 

refer to ‘‘Service Bulletin 737–28–

1200.’’

Request for Credit for Visual Check 

Three commenters request that the 

AD clarify that inspections 

accomplished prior to the effective date 

of the AD using the ‘‘visual check’’

criteria specified in Boeing Special 

Attention Service Bulletin 737–28–

1193, dated April 24, 2003, satisfy the 

‘‘detailed inspection’’ requirement of 

paragraph (f) of the NPRM. One 

commenter requests that the same 

clarification be applied for Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–

28–1200, dated July 10, 2003. Another 

commenter requests that ‘‘Note 1’’ and 

all references to it be deleted from the 

AD. The commenters state that Note 1 

could be interpreted so that only a 

detailed inspection as defined in the 

NPRM that is accomplished prior to the 

effective date of the AD shall receive 

credit in accordance with paragraph (e) 

of the AD. The commenters assert that 

the inspection criteria identified as a 

visual check in Boeing Special 

Attention Service Bulletin 737–28–1193 

are equivalent to the detailed inspection 

criteria described in Note 1 of the 

NPRM, and therefore, applicable 

airplanes that have already 

accomplished the inspection in 

accordance with Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 737–28–1193 will not 

need to be re-inspected. 

We partially agree. Airplanes that 

have received a visual check in 

accordance with Boeing Special 

Attention Service Bulletin 737–28–

1193, dated April 24, 2003; or Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–

28–1200, dated July 10, 2003; as 

applicable, prior to the effective date of 

this AD, may satisfy the requirement of 

this AD to perform a detailed 

inspection. If the visual check was 

performed to the same level of 

complexity and using equipment 

comparable to that specified for a 

detailed inspection as defined in Note 1 

of the AD, credit is given according to 

paragraph (e) of the AD. However, if the 

visual check did not meet all the 

parameters defined by Note 1, 

additional work is necessary to comply 

with the requirements of the AD. 

Therefore, we do not agree that the 

specified visual check necessarily meets 

the requirements of a detailed 

inspection; nor do we agree that Note 1 

and its applicable references should be 

deleted from the AD, as Note 1 clarifies 

what constitutes a detailed inspection. 

However, if anyone wishes to submit 

technical data demonstrating that they 

have performed a visual check that 

meets the requirements of a detailed 

inspection as defined in Note 1 of the 

AD, they may request approval of an 

alternative method of compliance 

(AMOC) in accordance with paragraph 

(h)(1) of the AD. We have not changed 

the AD in this regard. 

Request for Revised Costs of 

Compliance 

Two commenters request that we 

revise the costs of compliance. One 

commenter requests that we increase the 

number of work hours to reflect 

installation of Teflon sleeves around the 

wiring and revise the estimated cost 

accordingly. A second commenter states 

that it took 6 man-hours per airplane to 

accomplish the actions specified by the 

service bulletin, including operational 

tests. Though the second commenter 

made no request to change the work 

hours, we infer that the commenter 

wishes us to revise the estimated cost to 

reflect 6 man-hours. 

We do not agree with this request. 

Costs of compliance are limited to only 

the actions required by the AD, which, 

in this case, are those actions related to 

the detailed inspection of the wires in 

wire bundle W0024 to connector 

D04578P on the back of the P15 

refueling panel required by paragraph 

(f)(1) of the AD. The cost of any 

69426 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 16, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 

‘‘applicable corrective actions’’ is 

conditional on the result of the 

inspection and, regardless of any AD 

direction, those actions must be 

performed to correct an identified 

unsafe condition to ensure airworthy 

operation of the airplane, as required by 

the Federal Aviation Regulations. 

Further, the number of work-hours 

listed in the AD is consistent with the 

number provided by the service 

bulletin. We have not changed the AD 

in this regard. 

Request To Permit Concurrent Use of 

Information Notices 

One commenter states that Boeing 

service bulletins listed in the NPRM 

have information notices (INs) issued 

against them that provide minor 

clarifications and revisions to materials 

and part numbers. The commenter 

requests that the final rule allow for the 

use of the INs with the respective 

service bulletins when accomplishing 

the requirements of the AD. The 

commenter states this would allow 

operators to take advantage of the 

changes in the INs without having to 

request an AMOC. 

We concur that the applicable INs 

may be used with their respective 

Boeing service bulletins when 

accomplishing the requirements of the 

AD. Information Notices 737–28–1193 

IN 01 and 737–28–1200 IN 01 were 

released on September 11, 2003, to 

provide alternate part numbers, and 

minor clarifications and revisions to 

materials and part numbers. The 

information in these INs was 

subsequently incorporated into Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletins 737–

28–1193 and 737–28–1200, both 

Revision 1, both dated July 28, 2005. 

Therefore, we have revised paragraph 

(g) of the AD to give credit for using the 

above INs with Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletins 737–28–1193, dated 

April 24, 2003; or 737–28–1200, dated 

July 10, 2003; as applicable, for actions 

accomplished prior to the effective date 

of this AD. 

Request To Reduce the Compliance 

Time 

One commenter requests that the 

compliance time be reduced. The 

commenter states that the nature of the 

fault and hazard that may exist during 

ground and flight operations justifies 

reducing the 18 month compliance time 

specified in paragraph (f) of the NPRM. 

The commenter did not provide data to 

substantiate any reduction of the 

compliance time. 

We do not agree to revise the 

compliance time. The P15 refueling 

panel is powered only when the 

refueling panel access door is open for 

refueling the airplane, so there is no risk 

imposed during flight operations. 

Further, the refueling panel is properly 

grounded to protect the operator from 

any shock hazard during refueling. 

Therefore, the unsafe condition does not 

warrant immediate action and reduced 

compliance time; however, operators are 

always free to accomplish the 

requirements of the AD at any time 

before the compliance time. We have 

not changed the AD in this regard. 

Request To Increase the Compliance 

Time 

One commenter requests that the 

compliance time be increased. The 

commenter states that Boeing Special 

Attention Service Bulletin 737–28–1200 

recommends a 24-month compliance 

time and requests that the compliance 

time be increased to 24 months to align 

with current Model 737 Next Generation 

maintenance programs. 

We do not agree. We considered the 

urgency associated with the unsafe 

condition and the practical aspects of 

accomplishing the required inspection 

within an interval that corresponds to 

the normal maintenance schedules of 

most affected operators and, with 

manufacturer concurrence, arrived at an 

appropriate compliance time of 18 

months for all affected airplanes. 

Further, the manufacturer, in revising 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–

28–1200, has reduced the recommended 

compliance time from 24 months to 18 

months, which aligns with the 

compliance time proposed in the 

NPRM. In considering all these factors, 

we determined that this compliance 

time represents an appropriate interval 

during which the wiring behind the P15 

refueling panel can be inspected and 

any necessary corrective action taken 

while still maintaining an adequate 

level of safety. However, under the 

provisions of paragraph (h)(1) of the AD, 

we may approve requests for 

adjustments to the compliance time if 

data are submitted to substantiate that 

such adjustments would provide 

acceptable levels of safety. In addition, 

if further technical data are presented 

that would justify a revised compliance 

time, we may consider further 

rulemaking on this issue. We have not 

changed the AD in this regard. 

Clarification of AMOC Paragraph 

We have revised this action to clarify 

the appropriate procedure for notifying 

the principal inspector before using any 

approved AMOC on any airplane to 

which the AMOC applies. 

Conclusion 

We have carefully reviewed the 

available data, including the comments 

that have been submitted, and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting the AD 

with the changes described previously. 

We have determined that these changes 

will neither increase the economic 

burden on any operator nor increase the 

scope of the AD. 

Costs of Compliance 

This AD affects about 1,653 airplanes 

of U.S. registry and 4,254 airplanes 

worldwide. The inspections take about 

3 work hours per airplane, at an average 

labor rate of $65 per work hour. Based 

on these figures, the estimated cost of 

this AD for U.S. operators is $322,335, 

or $195 per airplane. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in subtitle VII, 

part A, subpart III, section 44701, 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We have determined that this AD will 

not have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. This AD will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

(3) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 16, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 69427 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this AD. See the ADDRESSES section for 

a location to examine the regulatory 

evaluation. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

2005–23–17 Boeing: Amendment 39–14375. 

Docket No. FAA–2004–19539; 

Directorate Identifier 2004–NM–06–AD. 

Effective Date 

(a) This AD becomes effective December 

21, 2005. 

Affected ADs 

(b) None. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to the Boeing airplanes 

listed in Table 1 of this AD, certificated in 

any category: 

TABLE 1.—APPLICABILITY

Airplane Line numbers 

Model 737–100, –200, –200C, –300, –400, and –500 series airplanes ................................................................... 1 through 3132 inclusive. 

Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800, and –900 series airplanes ............................................................................. 0001 through 1240 inclusive. 

Unsafe Condition 

(d) This AD was prompted by evidence of 

chafed wiring behind the P15 refuel panel 

and arcing to the back of the P15 refuel panel 

and adjacent wing structure. We are issuing 

this AD to detect and correct chafing of the 

wiring behind the P15 refuel panel, which 

could lead to arcing and fire with consequent 

airplane damage and injury to refueling 

personnel. 

Compliance 

(e) You are responsible for having the 

actions required by this AD performed within 

the compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

Inspection and Corrective Actions 

(f) Within 18 months after the effective 

date of this AD, perform the following 

actions as applicable: 

(1) For Model 737–100, –200, –200C, –300, 

–400, and –500 series airplanes: Perform a 

one-time detailed inspection of the wires in 

wire bundle W0024 to connector D04578P on 

the back of the P15 refuel panel for 

discrepancies, and do any applicable 

corrective and related investigative actions 

before further flight, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–28–

1193, Revision 1, dated July 28, 2005. 

(2) For Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800, 

and –900 series airplanes: Perform all 

applicable actions listed in paragraphs 

(f)(2)(i) and (f)(2)(ii) of this AD in accordance 

with the Accomplishment Instructions of 

Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 

737–28–1200, Revision 1, dated July 28, 

2005. 

(i) For Group 1 and Group 2 airplanes as 

defined in Service Bulletin 737–28–1200: 

Perform a one-time detailed inspection for 

discrepancies of the clamp and T-bolt 

assembly on the wing thermal anti-ice duct 

near the P15 refuel panel and do any 

applicable corrective actions before further 

flight. 

(ii) For Group 2 airplanes only as defined 

in Service Bulletin 737–28–1200: Perform a 

one-time detailed inspection for 

discrepancies of the wires in wire bundle 

W0024 to connector D04578P on the back of 

the P15 refuel panel and do any applicable 

corrective actions before further flight. 

Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a 

detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive visual 

examination of a specific structural area, 

system, installation, or assembly to detect 

damage, failure, or irregularity. Available 

lighting is normally supplemented with a 

direct source of good lighting at intensity 

deemed appropriate by the inspector. 

Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying 

lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning 

and elaborate access procedures may be 

required.’’

Credit for Actions Done Previously 

(g) Actions accomplished before the 

effective date of this AD in accordance with 

Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 

737–28–1193, dated April 24, 2003; or 

Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 

737–28–1200, dated July 10, 2003; as 

applicable; including Information Notices 

737–28–1193 IN 01 and 737–28–1200 IN 01; 

both dated September 11, 2003; as 

applicable, are acceptable for compliance 

with the corresponding actions required by 

this AD. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested in accordance with the procedures 

found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

(2) Before using any AMOC approved in 

accordance with 14 CFR 39.19 on any 

airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify 

the appropriate principal inspector in the 

FAA Flight Standards Certificate Holding 

District Office. 

Material Incorporated by Reference 

(i) You must use Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 737–28–1193, Revision 1, 

dated July 28, 2005; or Boeing Special 

Attention Service Bulletin 737–28–1200, 

Revision 1, dated July 28, 2005; as 

applicable; to perform the actions that are 

required by this AD, unless the AD specifies 

otherwise. The Director of the Federal 

Register approved the incorporation by 

reference of these documents in accordance 

with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. 

Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. 

Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124–2207, 

for a copy of this service information. You 

may review copies at the Docket Management 

Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 

400 Seventh Street SW., room PL–401, Nassif 

Building, Washington, DC; on the Internet at 

http://dms.dot.gov; or at the National 

Archives and Records Administration 

(NARA). For information on the availability 

of this material at the NARA, call (202) 741–

6030, or go to http://www.archives.gov/ 

federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ 

ibr_locations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

November 7, 2005. 

Kalene C. Yanamura, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 05–22591 Filed 11–15–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2005–22972; Directorate 

Identifier 2003–NM–265–AD; Amendment 

39–14376; AD 2005–23–18] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Fokker 

Model F27 Mark 050 Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule; request for 

comments.