alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 11.1**

**CALCULATIONOF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGSPER COMMON SHARE**

| ** **                                                                      | ** ** | **52 Weeks Ended** | ** ** | **53 Weeks Ended** | ** ** | **52 Weeks Ended** | ** ** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------|------------|------------------------------|------------|------------------------------|------------|
| **Earnings Per Share**                                                | ** ** | **December 27,  2003**  | ** ** | **January 1,  2005**    | ** ** | **December 31,  2005**  | ** ** |
| Net income applicable to  common stockholders                                   |       |                         | $          | 11,089,000                   |       |                         |       | $ | 13,297,000 |   |   |   | $ | 13,405,000 |   |   |
| **Basic Earnings Per Share**                                                    |       |                         |       |                         |       |                         |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted average  number of common shares outstanding                      |       |                         | 14,256,000 |                         |       |                         | 15,589,000 |   |   |   | 15,726,000 |   |   |
| Basic earnings per share                                                        |       |                         | $          | 0.78                         |       |                         |       | $ | 0.85 |   |   |   | $ | 0.85 |   |   |
| **Diluted  Earnigs Per Share**                                                  |       |                         |       |                         |       |                         |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted average  number of common shares outstanding                      |       |                         | 14,256,000 |                         |       |                         | 15,589,000 |   |   |   | 15,726,000 |   |   |
| Assuming conversion of  outstanding stock options                               |       |                         | 2,015,000  |                         |       |                         | 1,651,000  |   |   |   | 1,547,000 |   |   |
| Less: assumed repurchase  of common stock pursuant to the treasury stock method |       |                         | (1,550,000 | )                            |       |                         | (1,236,000 | ) |   |   | (1,123,000 | ) |   |
| Weighted average number  of common shares outstanding as adjusted               |       |                         | 14,721,000 |                         |       |                         | 16,004,000 |   |   |   | 16,150,000 |   |   |
| Diluted earnings per share                                                      |       |                         | $          | 0.75                         |       |                         |       | $ | 0.83 |   |   |   | $ | 0.83 |   |   |

 

----
# L_2007294EN.01003601.xml

| 13.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 294/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 294/36

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1303/2007 of 5 November 2007 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1966/2006 on electronic recording and reporting of fishing activities and on means of remote sensing

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 290 of 8 November 2007
  )

The publication of this Regulation in the abovementioned Official Journal is annulled.

---
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances

set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 99-20694

_____________________

MICHAEL J. SUTTON; JOHN WILEY MITCHELL,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

Cross-Appellants,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellant,

Cross-Appellee.

_______________________________________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for

the Southern District of Texas

(H-83-CV-6674)

_______________________________________________________

September 19, 2000

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In this Federal Torts Claims Act case that claims malicious prosecution under

Texas law, the district judge carefully considered the evidence, spelled out the
2

ineptness and misconduct of the postal inspector, and attempted to bring a just

closure to the dispute. However, the court was unable to find by a preponderance of

the evidence that the plaintiffs were innocent of the charges made against them. 

Because that finding is necessary to support the judgment, it cannot stand.

From the bench and in its findings and conclusions, the court states that lack

of conviction leaves plaintiffs entitled to a presumption of innocence. While that

relieves them of criminal guilt, it does not prove malicious prosecution. Texas law

requires a plaintiff in a malicious prosecution claim to establish innocence. See

Richey v. Brookshire Grocery Co., 952 S.W.2d 515, 517 (Tex. 1997). Because

plaintiffs failed to meet their burden of proving innocence, we reverse the judgment

and render a take-nothing judgment for the United States.

JUDGMENT REVERSED AND RENDERED FOR THE UNITED

STATES.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-80364, 333-01851, 33-84064, 333-42773,
333-42767, 333-65939, 333-33804) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-43788, 33-48610,
33-53802, 33-06191, 333-27907, 333-45558, 333-45562, 333-66602) of Plains
Resources Inc. of our report dated March 13, 2002, relating to the consolidated
financial statements, which appear in this Form 10-K/A.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Houston, Texas
March 28, 2002
FIRST
      M
& F CORPORATION





**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATIONS**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of First M&F Corporation (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John G. Copeland,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge
      and
      belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:





A.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





B.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:  March
      12,
      2008




/s/
                John G. CopelandJohn
                G. CopelandEVP
                & Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                 CONSENT OF CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES INC.

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                                  [LETTERHEAD]

                                 March  20, 2002

Permian Basin Royalty Trust
Bank of America, N.A., Trustee
901 Main Street
Dallas, Texas

Gentlemen:

         Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc. hereby consents to the use of the
oil and gas reserve information in the Permian Basin Royalty Trust Securities
and Exchange Commission Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2001 and in
the Permian Basin Royalty Trust Annual Report for the year ending December 31,
2001, based on reserve reports dated March 20, 2002 prepared by Cawley,
Gillespie & Associates, Inc.


Submitted,


                                         /s/ CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                         CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                                 GREY WOLF, INC.
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


                                                            State/Country of
                                                        Subsidiary Incorporation
                                                        ------------------------

Grey Wolf Drilling Company                                    Texas
DI Energy, Inc.                                               Texas
Grey Wolf International, Inc.                                 Texas
DI/Perfensa Inc.                                              Texas
Grey Wolf Drilling de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                    Mexico
Drillers International, S.A.                                  Argentina
Perforaciones Andinas S.A.                                    Panama
Grey Wolf Drilling de Venezuela, C.A.                         Venezuela
Drillers Inc. DI de Venezuela, C. A.                          Venezuela
Grey Wolf Drilling International, Ltd.                        Cayman Islands


                                      -57-
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5665 

To prohibit the withdrawal of certain public lands and National Forest System 

lands in Arizona from location and entry under the Mining Law of 

1872, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 1, 2010 

Mr. FRANKS of Arizona (for himself, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. 

GOHMERT, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. PITTS, Mrs. 

SCHMIDT, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. LATTA, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. TIAHRT, 

Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California, Mr. BRADY of 

Texas, Mr. AKIN, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. POSEY, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. 

BOREN, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. SCHOCK, Mr. FLAKE, Mrs. LUMMIS, 

Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. HERGER, 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. CHAFFETZ, and Mr. SIMPSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit the withdrawal of certain public lands and National Forest System lands in Arizona from location and 

entry under the Mining Law of 1872, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5665 IH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON WITHDRAWAL OF CERTAIN 

2 PUBLIC LANDS AND NATIONAL FOREST SYS3 TEM LANDS IN ARIZONA. 

4 The Secretary of the Interior may not withdraw pub5 lic lands or National Forest System lands from location 

6 and entry under the Mining Law of 1872 (30 U.S.C. 22 

7 et seq.) pursuant to the notice published by the Secretary 

8 on July 21, 2009 (74 Fed. Reg. 35887). The lands de9 scribed in that notice shall not be segregated from location 

10 and entry under the 1872 Mining Law as described in 

11 such notice, and such notice shall have no other force or 

12 effect. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

J.L., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, 

Houston, TX, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0209

Issued: May 25, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On November 30, 2022 appellant filed a timely appeal from an August 19, 2022 merit 

decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the 

Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 23-0209.

In a letter dated April 21, 2023 and received on April 28, 2023, appellant requested that 

the appeal be withdrawn.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that appellant’s request for the 

withdrawal of the appeal should be granted. Accordingly, 
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the withdrawal of the appeal 

is granted. The appeal docketed as No. 23-0209 is dismissed.

Issued: May 25, 2023

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 217 (Thursday, November 10, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 68478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22458]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Membership of National Science Foundation's Senior Executive 
Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Announcement of Membership of the National Science Foundation's 
Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This announcement of the membership of the National Science 
Foundation's Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board is made 
in compliance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Director, Division of Human 
Resource Management, National Science Foundation, Room 315, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Joseph F. Burt at the above 
address or (703) 292-8180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The membership of the National Science 
Foundation's Senior Executive Performance Review Board is as follows:

Kathie L. Olsen, Deputy Director, Chairperson
Anthony A. Arnolie, Director, Office of Information and Resource 
Management and Chief Human Capital Officer
Richard A. Behnke, Head, Upper Atmosphere Research Section
Deborah L. Crawford, Deputy Assistant Director for Computer and 
Information Science and Engineering
Nathaniel Pitts, Director, Office of Integrative Activities
Thomas A. Weber, Director, Division of Materials Research

    Dated: November 4, 2005.
Joseph F. Burt,
Director, Division of Human Resource Management.
[FR Doc. 05-22458 Filed 11-9-05; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                              54
<SECURITIES>                                       127
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1397
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (25)
<INVENTORY>                                        498
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                            1664
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (892)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3393
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                           1055
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           786
<OTHER-SE>                                      (2277)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4884
<SALES>                                           4259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4410
<CGS>                                             3688
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4365
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   158
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     8
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  16
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     45
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (24)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 21
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        21
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>The company has adopted an unclassified presentation in the Statement of
Financial Condition.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5612 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to temporarily increase the 

investment tax credit for geothermal energy property. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2010 

Mr. BLUMENAUER (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Ms. BERKLEY, 

Ms. GIFFORDS, Mr. MCDERMOTT, and Mr. GARAMENDI) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to temporarily 

increase the investment tax credit for geothermal energy 

property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Geothermal Energy 

5 Investment Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN INVESTMENT TAX CRED7 IT FOR GEOTHERMAL ENERGY PROPERTY. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subclause (II) of section 

9 48(a)(2)(A)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5612 IH

1 amended by striking ‘‘paragraph (3)(A)(i)’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘clause (i) or (iii) of paragraph (3)(A)’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 this section shall apply to periods after the date of the 

5 enactment of this Act, under rules similar to the rules of 

6 section 48(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as 

7 in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of 

8 the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1990). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### Elaine NURSE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK and New York City Computer Service Center, Defendants.

No. 85 Civ. 6432 (RWS).

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 4, 1990.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

In an opinion dated March 2, 1990, 735 F.Supp. 69, the Court dismissed plaintiff Elaine Nurse’s §§ 1981, 1983 and ADEA claims. In addition, because Nurse had been unable to produce a right-to-sue letter issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), the Court ruled that the Title VII claim would be dismissed as well unless Nurse could produce the letter within twenty days of the decision. Upon the consent of defendants, the City of New York, Nurse requested and received an extension of time until May 21, 1990 to produce the right-to-sue letter. By letter dated May 22, 1990, Nurse informed the Court that no right-to-sue letter could be found and that it was now her position that the EEOC had never issued such a letter.

Although a right-to-sue letter is not a jurisdictional requirement, *Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.,*455 U.S. 385, 393,102 S.Ct. 1127, 1132, 71 L.Ed.2d 234 (1982); *Hladki v. Jeffrey’s Consolidated, Ltd.,*652 F.Supp. 388, 392 (E.D.N.Y.1987), it is a statutory prerequisite for a Title VII action. Despite the lack of an agency record that can confirm or deny the issuance of a right-to-sue letter, there is no proof that Nurse made any attempt to procure such letter as she was obliged to do to bring her Title VII suit. It was incumbent upon Nurse to raise the failure of the EEOC to issue a letter, if indeed there was such a failure, prior to the commencement of her suit in federal court and therefore there *812exists no reason to toll or waive the statutory requirement.

Nurse’s claims are dismissed in accordance with the March 2, 1990 opinion.

It is so ordered.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,900
<SECURITIES>                                    36,714
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,880)
<INVENTORY>                                    135,272
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               245,999
<PP&E>                                         165,443
<DEPRECIATION>                                (89,308)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 394,002
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          186,973
<BONDS>                                         92,217
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        62,710
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   394,002
<SALES>                                      1,927,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,927,092
<CGS>                                        1,752,899
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,895,543
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,020
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,410
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,103
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,307
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,307
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 12.1

EAST WEST BANCORP, INC.
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

Year Ending December 31,2009

2008

2007

2006

2005(Dollars in thousands)Income (Loss) before tax

$
104,722

$
(97,168
)
$
262,259

$
233,781

$
170,361Fixed ChargesInterest expense


110,022


131,634


124,578


92,303


37,698Estimate of interest within rental expense


5,014


3,574


3,545


3,022


2,298Preferred dividends


24,784


17,928


-


-


-Fixed charges and preferred dividend, excluding interest on deposits

$
139,820

$
153,136

$
128,123

$
95,325

$
39,996Interest on deposits


129,477


178,060


241,035


200,265


93,586Fixed charges and preferred dividend, including interest on deposits

$
269,297

$
331,196

$
369,158

$
295,590

$
133,582Total earnings, fixed charges and preferred dividends, excluding interest on deposits


244,542


55,968


390,382


329,106


210,357Total earnings, fixed charges and preferred dividends, including interest on deposits


374,019


234,028


631,417


529,371


303,943Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred DividendsExcluding interest on deposits


1.75


0.37


3.05


3.45


5.26Including interest on deposits


1.39


0.71


1.71


1.79


2.28


---



QuickLinks