alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2007326EN.01002401.xml

| 12.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 326/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 326/24

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1462/2007

of 11 December 2007

amending Council Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 concerning further restrictive measures in relation to Liberia

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 concerning further restrictive measures in relation to Liberia (1), and in particular Article 11(a) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 lists the natural and legal persons, bodies and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 lists the natural and legal persons, bodies and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation.

| (2) | On 28 November 2007, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to amend the list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. Annex I should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 28 November 2007, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to amend the list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. Annex I should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 December 2007.

For the Commission

Eneko LANDÁBURU

Director-General for External Relations

---

(1)  
  OJ L 162, 30.4.2004, p. 32. Regulation as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1791/2006 (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p. 1).

1

---

ANNEX

Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 is amended as follows:

The following natural person shall be removed:

Grace Beatrice Minor. Date of birth: 31.5.1942. Other information: Key advisor to former President Charles Taylor.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Mission Resources Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-54798) on Form S-8 of Mission Resources Corporation, of our report dated
February 28, 2002, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Mission
Resources Corporation (formerly Bellwether Exploration Company) and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, which report
appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Mission Resources
Corporation.

Our report refers to a change in accounting for derivative financial
instruments, effective January 1, 2001.

                                               KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
March 28, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,254<F1>
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,254<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>The only revenue and expense associated with the trust pertains to
dividends received and paid out.  All dividends received are in turn
paid out, accounting for net income of zero ($0).
<F2>Earnings per share is not applicable as net income is zero ($0).
</FN>


</TABLE>
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      NFC. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  June      27, 2008 |   | /s/    | PAMELA J. TURBEVILLE             |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------|----------------------------------|
|                                |   |                  | Pamela      J. Turbeville        |
|                                |   |                  | Principal      Executive Officer |

| Date:      June 27, 2008 |   | /s/    | JOHN V.  MULVANEY, SR. |
|--------------------------|--------|------------------|----------------------------------|
|                     |   |             | John      V. Mulvaney, Sr.       |
|                     |   |             | Principal      Financial Officer |

| Date:      June 27, 2008 |   | /s/    | DAVID L. DERFELT                  |
|--------------------------|--------|------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                     |   |             | David      L. Derfelt             |
|                     |   |             | Principal      Accounting Officer |

----
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Strategic Internet
  Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
  March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
  hereof (the "Report"). I, Ralph Shearing, Chief Executive Officer of the company,
  certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of the Company.

|Date: | May 19, 2004 |  | /s/ Ralph Shearing           
|----- | ------------ |  | -----------------------------
|      |              |  | Ralph Shearing, CEO, Director



---
Exhibit (99.2)

 Written Statement of the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

      Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the
undersigned Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Alliant
Energy Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge,
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/  Thomas M. Walker
---------------------
Thomas M. Walker
November 14, 2002
FIRST M & F CORPORATION

**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

          In connection with the Annual Report of First M&F Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John G. Copeland, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| A.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                     |
| B.     | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company. |
|   |                                                                                                                                                     |
| Date:  | March 12, 2007                                                                                                                                           |

|   | /s/ John G. Copeland              |
|--------|-----------------------------------|
|   |                                   |
|   | John G. Copeland                  |
|   | EVP & Chief Financial Officer |

----
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of The X-Change Corporation on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Sheriff, President of the X-Change Corporation (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.November 13, 2007   /s/ Michael L. Sheriff Michael L. Sheriff  President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman  (Principal Executive Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and willbe retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.
#### Thomas L. DiTRAGLIA et al. v. CITY COUNCIL OF the CITY OF PAWTUCKET et al.

No. 88-576-M.P.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island.

April 20, 1990.

Joseph A. Capineri, Capineri & Crowley, Pawtucket, for plaintiffs.

Gerald J. Pouliot, City Hall, Pawtucket, for defendants.

OPINION

SHEA, Justice.

This is a petition for certiorari brought by the petitioners, owners of a used-car sales business, from the City Council of the City of Pawtucket’s denial of the petitioners’ automobile-repair-shop-license application. We quash the order of the city council.

The respondent City Council of the City of Pawtucket failed to file a brief and did not appear for the oral arguments on this matter. However, it can be discerned from the information provided that the question before us involves the validity of an ordinance regulating automobile-repair shops within the city of Pawtucket. This city ordinance, chapter 2008, was enacted on December 10, 1987. The enabling legislation that grants the city of Pawtuck-et the authority to legislate and regulate motor-vehicle-repair businesses in that city, however, was not enacted until July 7, *13411989. *See*P.L.1989, ch. 313, § 1. As such, the city ordinance in question is ultra vires and a nullity.

Accordingly the petition for certiorari is granted, the order of the city council denying the application for the repair-shop license is quashed, and the papers of the case are remanded to the city council with our decision endorsed thereon,
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

August 3, 2016

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

No. 15

‐ 1720

Kimberly Hively,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellant

,

v.

Ivy Tech Community College,

South Bend,

Defendant

‐ Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Indiana,

South Bend Division

No. 3:14

‐ cv

‐ 1791

Rudy Lozano, Judge

O R D E R

This Court’s opinion of July 28, is amended as follows:

On page 7 of the opinion, the word “discrimination” should be inserted between

the words “orientation” and “in” so that the complete sentence which begins on page 6

and carries over to page 7 reads as follows:

Moreover, Congress has not acted to amend Title VII even in the face of an

abundance of judicial opinions recognizing an emerging consensus that

sexual orientation discrimination in the workplace can no longer be

tolerated.
#### KNECHT, INC., a New Jersey Corporation, Plaintiff, v. FIRST INDEMNITY OF AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey Corporation, Defendant.

Civ. A. No. 89C-MY-166.

Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle County.

Submitted: April 27, 1990.

Decided: May 9, 1990.

William H. Sudell, Jr., and Matthew B. Lehr, of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, and Stanley B. Edelstein of

Jacoby, Donner & Jacoby, P.C., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

The corporation defendant is unrepresented.

OPINION

GEBELEIN, Judge.

Before the Court for decision is plaintiff’s motion to set aside a satisfaction of judgment entered on the records of this Court, September 28, 1989. The factual basis for this motion indicates that a default judgment was entered in plaintiff’s favor on August 17, 1989 against defendant, First Indemnity of America Insurance Company, the bonding company for Space Engineering Mechanical Corp. The amount of the judgment was for $88,-732.27.

On or about September 27, 1989 an individual, a purported principal of Space Engineering, appeared at plaintiff’s offices to obtain relief from the judgment. He agreed in writing that the judgment would be satisfied in installments; but required that immediate removal of the judgment be accomplished in order that Space Engineering could perform on other contracts, and be bonded by defendant herein. Upon payment of the initial installment, $30,000, the judgment was satisfied. No further payments were ever received.

The current motion and affidavit were filed and notice was given to the defendant bonding company. As in the initial proceeding the defendant has not chosen to appear in this Court or offer any defense to this motion.

There appears to be no reported decision in Delaware with respect to the jurisdiction of a court to set aside a satisfaction of its own judgment. There is, however, authority in other jurisdictions for the relief sought by plaintiff’s motion. *Romero v. DeConcini, McDonald and Brammer,*26 Ariz.App. 235, 547 P.2d 506 (1976) and *Knaak v. Brown,*115 Neb. 260, 212 N.W. 431 (1927).

In particular, the Nebraska Supreme Court in *Knaak,*likened a satisfaction to a receipt and stated: *659may be vacated.... *Id.*212 N.W. at 434.

> *658... in case of absence or failure of consideration, the entry [of satisfaction]

*659In *Romero, supra,*the Arizona Court of Appeals reversed a trial court that had refused to set aside a satisfaction where a partial payment had been received, but the remaining judgment amount was not paid. The Court held that the satisfaction of judgment without consideration could be set aside *pro tanto.*

As in *Romero,*the satisfaction in this Court was entered based upon a partial payment. The remaining monies remain unpaid.

The Court is convinced that pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 60(b)(6) it has the jurisdiction to set aside a satisfaction of judgment upon absence or failure of consideration. In this case $30,000 was paid on the judgment; and $58,732.27 remained to be paid. The satisfaction of judgment is set aside *pro tanto.*Judgment shall be reinstated for the plaintiff in the amount of $58,732.27.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-05-040]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: 

United States International Trade Commission.

# DATE AND TIME:

 November 17, 2005 at 11 a.m.

# PLACE:

 Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS:

 Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agenda for future meetings: None.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-340-E and H (Second Review) (Solid Urea From Russia and Ukraine)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before December 2, 2005.)

5. Outstanding action jackets: None.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: November 8, 2005.

Marilyn R. Abbott,

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 05-22559 Filed 11-8-05; 2:56 pm]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
DISMISSED; Opinion Filed June 5, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00282-CV

JOHNNY JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND BRANDY GILBREATH, Appellees

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-03749-2017

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Carlyle

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order granting Liberty Mutual Insurance Company’s 

motion for summary judgment on Johnny Johnson’s “contractual and extra-contractual claims.” 

The order granting the motion recites in its entirety as follows:

Came on to be heard Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on 

Plaintiff’s contractual and extra-contractual claims and causes of action and the 

Court having considered the Motion, Response and Pleadings and heard the parties’ 

argument is of the opinion that the Motion should be GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment on Plaintiff’s contractual and extra-contractual claims and causes of 

action is GRANTED.

Because the record reflected Johnson had sued Liberty Mutual adjuster Brandy Gilbreath 

as well and the order did not dispose of that portion of the suit or “clearly and unequivocally” state 

it finally disposed of all claims and parties, we questioned whether we had jurisdiction over the 
–2–

appeal. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195, 205 (Tex. 2001) (subject to mostly 

statutory exceptions, appeal may be taken only from judgment that disposes of all parties and 

claims or “clearly and unequivocally states” it finally disposes of all claims and parties). At our 

request, Johnson filed a letter brief addressing our concern, but nothing in his letter demonstrates 

our jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See id. at 195; see also TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(a).

190282F.P05

/Cory L. Carlyle/

CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JOHNNY JOHNSON, Appellant

No. 05-19-00282-CV V.

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY AND BRANDY 

GILBREATH, Appellees

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District 

Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-03749-2017.

Opinion delivered by Justice Carlyle, 

Justices Myers and Molberg participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellees Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Brandy Gilbreath 

recover their costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Johnny Johnson.

Judgment entered this 5th day of June, 2019.