alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of the Company for the three months
ended March 31, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000054291
<NAME> KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              21
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      324
<ALLOWANCES>                                         6
<INVENTORY>                                        528
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,014
<PP&E>                                           1,163
<DEPRECIATION>                                      23
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,967
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              543
<BONDS>                                            963
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               27
<PREFERRED>                                          2
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                         118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,967
<SALES>                                            597
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   597
<CGS>                                              500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    52
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  28
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     18
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 12
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        12
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

 Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                   Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Alliant
Energy Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on our knowledge,
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Erroll B. Davis, Jr.
------------------------
Erroll B. Davis, Jr.
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer




/s/ Thomas M. Walker
--------------------
Thomas M. Walker
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2003
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (No. 33-99432, No. 333-32157 and No. 333-58134) of Intelligent Systems
Corporation of our report dated February 16, 2001 except for the third paragraph
of Note 11, which is dated March 17, 2001, with respect to consolidated
financial statements of PaySys International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1999 and 2000 and for the three years in the period ended December
31, 2000 included in the Form 10-K of Intelligent Systems Corporation for the
year ended December 31, 2001.



                                      /s/Ernst & Young LLP


March 19, 2002
Atlanta, Georgia
EXHIBIT 10.46
​
EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE
​
THIS EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE (the “Amendment”) dated as of November 17th, 2021 (the “Effective Date”), is made to the Office Lease dated August 1, 1999, as amended (the “Lease”), by and between Jaytee-Springhurst, LLC (“Landlord”) and Republic Bank & Trust Company (“Tenant”). As parties hereto, Landlord and Tenant hereby agree to further modify and amend the Lease as hereinafter set forth.
​
NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by the parties, Landlord and Tenant hereby agree as follows:
​
		1.	Premises, Article I of the Lease is hereby amended to add the following to Article I, Section 1: “The 858 square feet of the Premises located on the second floor of the Building and specifically identified as Suite 240 is hereby added to the definition of Premises. The total of 858 square feet comprising that portion of Suite 240 more particularly shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof is hereinafter referred to as “Additional Premises” and hereinafter is to be included in any reference to “Premises.” 

​
		2.	Rent. Article III of the Lease is hereby amended by adding the following to Article III, Section 1: “Tenant shall pay to Landlord, at such place as Landlord may from time-to-time designate, as rental for the Additional Premises, the amount set forth on the rental chart attached hereto as Exhibit B and made a part hereof, as of December 1, 2021.” 

​
		3.	Term. The term for the Additional Premises shall run from the Effective Date to July 31, 2024, with Tenant having one five-year option to renew the Additional Premises at the same rental rate stated herein, plus an adjustment for a CPI increase. Rent shall be increased during the option period, if exercised, by the most recent five-year average CPI increase for all urban consumers to be calculated as of the last five (5) years of the term of the Additional Premises. Tenant shall notify Landlord of Tenant’s intent to exercise this option herein provided within 90 days of the expiration of the current term of the Additional Premises referenced herein.

​
The terms and provisions of the Lease shall continue in full force and effect except as modified and amended herein.
​
REPUBLIC BANK & TRUST COMPANYJAYTEE-SPRINGHURST, LLC
​
​
By: /s/Kevin Sipes​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​By: /s/Michael Trager-Kusman ​ ​​ ​

1



       Kevin Sipes        Michael Trager-Kusman
Exhibit A
[ 

2



Exhibit B
​
	Suite
	Sqft
	Rate
	Annual Rent

	Additional Space (Suite 240A)
	858
	$19.41
	$16,653.78



​

3
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 17

- 00236

- CR

M YRON J AMAL N ASH

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from

Criminal District Court No. 1

of Tarran t County (1482186D)

September 20, 2018

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the tria l

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel
#### STATE v. SALEM

No. 18 PC.

Case below: 17 N.C. App. 269.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 April 1973.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report included in this Form 10-K/A, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 File Nos. 33-30249, 33-38201, 33-45610,
33-45614, 33-80084, 33-60343, 33-60389, 333-69789 and 333-69791, and on Form S-3
File Nos. 33-31409, 33-44769, 33-89178, 333-13859 and 333-34715.

                                                     /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Rochester, New York
April 19, 2001
#### THE DREAM MERCHANT COMPANY, KFT., Appellant, v. FREMONSTER THEATRICAL, Appellee.

No. 05-1174.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 28, 2005.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the unopposed motion of The Dream Merchant Company Kft. to voluntarily dismiss its appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS  OF JOURNAL  EMPLOYEES'  STOCK  TRUST AS OF AND FOR THE THREE  MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,922 <F1>
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,922 <F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0 <F2>

<FN>

<F1> The  only  revenue  and  expense  associated  with the  trust  pertains  to
dividends  received and paid out. All  dividends  received are in turn paid out,
accounting for net income of zero($0)

<F2> Earnings per share is not applicable as net income is zero($0)
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. SHELTON LUCAS and TERRY BARNES

No. 747SC339

(Filed 17 April 1974)

Criminal Law § 161— exception to judgment — review of record

An exception to the judment presents the face of the record proper for review, and, ordinarily, such review is limited to the questions of whether error of law appears on the face of the record and whether judgment is regular in form.

*344Appeal by defendants from *Webb, Judge,*22 October 1973 Session of Superior Court held in Nash. County.

In separate indictments, proper in form, defendants were charged with armed robbery. They pleaded not guilty and a jury found them guilty as charged. As to defendant Barnes, the court entered judgment imposing prison sentence of 25 years with credit to be given for time spent in jail awaiting trial. As to defendant Lucas, the court entered judgment imposing prison sentence of 20 years with credit given for time spent in jail awaiting trial. Both defendants appealed.

*Attorney General Robert Morgan, by Deputy Attorney Getb-eral Jean A. Benoy, for the State.*

*Roy C. Boddie for defendant appellant Shelton Lucas.*

*Fields, Cooper & Henderson, by Roy A. Cooper, Jr., for defendant appellant Terry Barnes.*

BRITT, Judge.

The sole assignment of error presented by each defendant is to the entry of judgment against him.

An exception to the judgment presents the face of the record proper for review; and, ordinarily, such review is limited to the questions of whether error of law appears on the face of the record and whether the judgment is regular in form. *State v. Shelly,*280 N.C. 300, 185 S.E. 2d 702 (1972); *State v. Kirby,*276 N.C. 123, 171 S.E. 2d 416 (1970); *State v. Strickland,*10 N.C. App. 540, 179 S.E. 2d 162 (1971).

We have examined the record proper and detect no error in law and the judgments are regular in form. Furthermore, we have reviewed the evidence and conclude that it fully supports the verdicts and the judgments, and the sentences imposed are within the limits prescribed by statute.

No error.

Judges Hedrick and Carson concur.
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wisconsin Power and Light Company (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ William D. Harvey

William D. Harvey

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

/s/ Patricia L. Kampling

Patricia L. Kampling

Vice President-Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

 

August 6, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [WO-260-09-1060-00-24 1A] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

                        Corrections to Notice of Call for Nominations for the Wild Horse and Burro Advisory Board. This notice was previously published in the                         **Federal Register:**                         Vol. 70, No. 193/Tuesday, October 6, 2005.                     

# SUMMARY:

                        The                         **Federal Register**                         Notice has an incorrect date for nominations to be submitted to the National Wild Horse and Burro Advisory Board. The corrected notice extends the date to November 30, 2005. The nominations should be submitted to the National Wild Horse and Burro Program, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Interior, P.O. Box 12000, Reno, Nevada 89520-0006, Attn: Ramona DeLorme: fax (775) 861-6711.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Jeff Rawson, Group Manager, Wild Horse and Burro Group, (202) 452-0379. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may reach                         *Ms. DeLorme*                         at any time by calling the Federal Information Relay Service at 1 (800) 877-8339.                     

Dated: October 25, 2005. 

Thomas H. Dyer, 

Deputy Assistant Director, Renewable Resources and Planning. 

[FR Doc. 05-22187 Filed 11-8-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-84-P
# L_2007333EN.01006901.xml

| 19.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 333/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 333/69

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1508/2007

of 18 December 2007

determining the extent to which applications for import rights lodged for the 2008 quota year for the import of live bovine animals of a weight exceeding 160 kg and originating in Switzerland, provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2172/2005, may be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2172/2005 of 23 December 2005 laying down detailed rules for the application of an import tariff quota for live bovine animals of a weight exceeding 160 kg and originating in Switzerland provided for in the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products (2), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2172/2005 sets the duty-free annual tariff quota for which Community importers may lodge an application for import rights in accordance with Article 3 of that Regulation at 4 600 head of cattle. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2172/2005 sets the duty-free annual tariff quota for which Community importers may lodge an application for import rights in accordance with Article 3 of that Regulation at 4 600 head of cattle.

| (2) | The quantities of import rights applied for are such that the applications may be accepted in full, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The quantities of import rights applied for are such that the applications may be accepted in full,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Each application for import rights lodged in accordance with Article 3(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2172/2005 for the quota period from 1 January to 31 December 2008 shall be accepted at a rate of 100 % of the import rights applied for.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 December 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 December 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2). Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 will be replaced by Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1) as from 1 July 2008.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 346, 29.12.2005, p. 10. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1965/2006 (OJ L 408, 30.12.2006, p. 26).

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5605 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5605

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 47 East Fayette Street in Uniontown, Pennsylvania, as the ``George C. 
                         Marshall Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. GEORGE C. MARSHALL POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 47 East Fayette Street in Uniontown, Pennsylvania, shall be 
known and designated as the ``George C. Marshall Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``George C. 
Marshall Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

T.B., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE,

Albion IN, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0399

Issued: March 1, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On January 26, 2023 appellant filed an appeal from a June 23, 2022 merit decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 23-0399.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act.1 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance 

of OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the June 23, 2022 decision was December 20, 2022. As 

appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until January 20, 2023, more than 180 days after 

the June 23, 2022 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 23-0399 is 

untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not 

explained his failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e).
2

establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP 

within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed 

as No. 23-0399, must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-0399 is dismissed.4

Issued: March 1, 2023

Washington, DC

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id.

at § 501.6(d).

4 Appellant also filed an appeal under OWCP File No. xxxxxx091 from a December 13, 2022 decision. The 

Board notes that the appeal under OWCP File No. xxxxxx091 will be considered under a separate docket number.