alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2007084DE.01004602.xml

| 24.3.2007 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 84/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2007

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 84/46

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 184/2007 der Kommission vom 20. Februar 2007 zur Zulassung von Kaliumdiformat (Formi LHS) als Futtermittelzusatzstoff

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 63 vom 1. März 2007
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 63 vom 1. März 2007

Im Inhalt, auf Seite 1 im Titel und in Erwägungsgrund 3 sowie auf Seite 3 in der Tabelle des Anhangs, Spalten 3, 4 und 9:

anstatt:

„Kaliumdiformat“

muss es heißen:

„Kaliumdiformiat“.

Auf Seite 3, in der Tabelle des Anhangs, Spalte 9 „Sonstige Bestimmungen“, Linie „Mastschweine“:

anstatt:

„18 000 mg/kg“

muss es heißen:

„12 000 mg/kg“.

---
#### ESTRIDGE v. DEVELOPMENT CO.

No. 50 PC.

Case below: 5 N.C. App. 604.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 18 September 1969.
# C_2007176EN.01000201.xml

| 28.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 176/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 176/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4367 — APW/APSA/Nordic Capital/Capio)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 176/02)

On 16 March 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4367. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4367. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5183 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5183

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the first-time 
homebuyer tax credit through December 31, 2010, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2010

  Mr. Bright introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the first-time 
homebuyer tax credit through December 31, 2010, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 36(h) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``May 1, 2010'' and 
inserting ``January 1, 2011''.
    (b) Binding Contract Exception.--Paragraph (2) of section 36(h) of 
such Code is amended--
            (1) by striking ``May 1, 2010'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``January 1, 2011'', and
            (2) by striking ``July 1, 2010'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``May 1, 2011''.
    (c) Special Rule for Individuals on Qualified Official Extended 
Duty Outside the United States.--Paragraph (3) of section 36(h) of such 
Code is amended--
            (1) by striking ``May 1, 2010'' in the matter preceding 
        subparagraph (A) and inserting ``January 1, 2011'',
            (2) by striking ```May 1, 2011' for `May 1, 2010''' and 
        inserting ```January 1, 2012' for `January 1, 2011''', and
            (3) by striking ```July 1, 2011' for `July 1, 2010''' and 
        inserting ```May 1, 2012' for `May 1, 2011'''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to residences purchased after April 30, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA entries is an appealable order. Accordingly, we conclude that we lack

jurisdiction, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'

Parraguirre

ChS2..4t , J.

111 Cherry

cc: Hon. James Crockett, District Judge Victor Tagle David Hermonson Donna Tenny Eighth District Court Clerk

'We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance

(0) 1947A aex. 2
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Nos. 333-07831, 333-07835, 333-28455, 333-28457, 333-28459, 333-63813, 333-63815, 333-41632, 333-41634, 333-41670, 033-88634, 333-53278, 333-86686, 333-86688,333-126062, and 333-144060) on Form S-8 and Registration Statements (Nos. 333-131073 and 333-135249) on Form S-3 of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. of our reports dated March 5, 2010 relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements,financial statement schedule and internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/ MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP 

San Diego, California 

March 5, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Part 1
          - [TD 9222]
          - RIN 1545-BD49

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Correction to final regulations.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects final regulations (TD 9222) that were published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Thursday, August 25, 2005 (70 FR 49864).                    

The final regulations under section 951(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) provide guidance for determining a United States shareholder's pro rata share of a controlled foreign corporation's (CFC's) subpart F income, previously excluded subpart F income withdrawn from investment in less developed countries, and previously excluded subpart F income withdrawn from foreign base company shipping operations.

# DATES:

This correction is effective August 25, 2005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jeffrey L. Vinnik, (202) 622-3840 (not a toll-free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background

The final regulations (TD 9222) that are the subject of this correction are under section 951(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.

## Need for Correction

As published, the final regulations (TD 9222) contain an error that may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification.

## Correction of Publication

Accordingly, the publication of the final regulations (TD 9222), which was the subject of FR Doc. 05-16611, is corrected as follows:

                        On page 49864, column 2, in the preamble under the paragraph heading, “                        *A. Amounts Determined Under Section 956 of the Code*                        ” second paragraph, line 4, the language “to section 956 under § 1.951-(1)(e).” is corrected to read “to section 956 under § 1.951-1(e).”.                    

Cynthia E. Grigsby,

Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).

[FR Doc. 05-22262 Filed 11-8-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### FRANKLIN WITT, Jr., Appellant, v. SHERIFF, WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 7649

December 20, 1974

529 P.2d 208

*Thomas L. Belaustegui*and *James W. Johnson, Jr.,*of Reno, for Appellant.

*Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *Robert E. Rose,*District Attorney, and *Michael E. Malloy,*Deputy District Attorney, Washoe County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

In this appeal from an order denying a pretrial petition for habeas corpus, we believe evidence presented to the grand jury justified its indictment of appellant. NRS 172.155; Callanan *418v. United States, 364 U.S. 587 (1961); McWilliams v. State, 87 Nev. 302, 486 P.2d 481 (1971).

“[W]e are not now concerned with the prospect that the evidence presently in the record may, by itself, be insufficient to sustain a conviction.” McDonald v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 326, 327, 512 P.2d 774, 775 (1973).

The order denying habeas relief is affirmed.
April 30, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WILLIAM C. WEBB, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00278-CR

NO. 14-13-00279-CR

NO. 14-13-00280-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the 

appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, William I. Miller, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Irwin FinancialCorporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
          c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.    /s/ William I. Miller   WILLIAM I. MILLER Chairman and Chief Executive Officer   Date: July 30, 2004
#### CHEMICAL CO. v. PLASTICS CORP.

No. 80 PC.

Case below: 6 N.C. App. 439.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 December 1969.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5613 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5613

 To require that vessels used to engage in drilling for oil or gas in 
ocean waters that are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States 
 must be documented under chapter 121 of title 46, United States Code.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 2010

Mr. Cohen (for himself, Mr. Arcuri, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Filner, Mr. Kagen, 
Mr. Patrick J. Murphy of Pennsylvania, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Tierney, and Mr. 
   Yarmuth) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require that vessels used to engage in drilling for oil or gas in 
ocean waters that are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States 
 must be documented under chapter 121 of title 46, United States Code.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Coastal Waters and 
Shorelines Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENT FOR VESSELS USED FOR OFFSHORE OIL AND 
              GAS DRILLING.

    Subsection (d) of section 12111 of title 46, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in the subsection heading, by striking ``Mobile 
        Offshore Drilling Unit'' and inserting ``Offshore Drilling'';
            (2) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ``or'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (3) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking the period and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (4) by adding at the end of paragraph (1) the following new 
        subparagraph:
                    ``(C) drilling for oil or gas in ocean waters 
                subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, or 
                support of such drilling.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATION FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,018,028
<SECURITIES>                                   400,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,867,120
<ALLOWANCES>                                   285,819
<INVENTORY>                                  4,430,353
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,633,934
<PP&E>                                       5,357,207
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,638,743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,877,147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,719,261
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         30
<COMMON>                                        59,913
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,782,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,877,147
<SALES>                                      5,353,053
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,201,908
<CGS>                                        3,260,998
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,027,879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             310,744
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (289,904)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (87,829)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (202,075)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (202,075)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)


</TABLE>
# L_2007132EN.01003401.xml

| 24.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 132/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 132/34

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 7 May 2007

appointing an Austrian alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2007/351/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Austrian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 24 January 2006 the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 24 January 2006 the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1).

| (2) | A seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the mandate of Mr Andreas SCHIEDER, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the mandate of Mr Andreas SCHIEDER,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Ms Elisabeth VITOUCH, Gemeinderätin der Stadt Wien, is hereby appointed an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions in place of Mr Andreas SCHIEDER for the remainder of his term of office, which runs until 25 January 2010.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 7 May 2007.

For the Council

The President

H. SEEHOFER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 56, 25.2.2006, p. 75.

1

---
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Bull Run Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his individual knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated:   November 28, 2003



/s/ FREDERICK J. ERICKSON
------------------------------------
Frederick J. Erickson
Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 11

            INTERNATIONAL MULTIFOODS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                     Computation of Earnings per Common Share
                                  (unaudited)

                     (in thousands, except per share amounts)




                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED     SIX MONTHS ENDED 
                                Aug. 31,   Aug. 31,    Aug. 31,   Aug. 31,
                                   1996       1995        1996       1995

Average shares of
  common stock outstanding       17,983      17,954     17,981     17,956
Common stock equivalents              2         103         17         89
Total common stock and 
  equivalents assuming
  full dilution                  17,985      18,057     17,998     18,045

Net earnings                     $3,995      $6,987     $3,562    $11,551

Less dividends on 
  redeemable preferred stock          -        (218)         -       (260)

Net earnings 
  applicable to common stock     $3,995      $6,769     $3,562    $11,291

Earnings per 
  share of common stock:
    Primary                      $  .22      $  .38     $  .20    $   .63
    Fully diluted                $  .22      $  .37     $  .20    $   .63

Primary earnings per share has been computed by dividing net earnings, 
after deduction of preferred stock dividends, by the weighted average 
number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.  Common 
stock options and other common stock equivalents have not entered into the 
primary earnings per share computations since their effect is not 
significant.

Fully diluted earnings per share has been computed assuming issuance of 
all shares for stock options deemed to be common stock equivalents, using 
the treasury stock method.