alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### HILL v. SHANKS

No. 81 PC.

Case below: 6 N.C. App. 255.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 December 1969.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Earle M. Jorgensen Company (EMJ) for the period ended September 28, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Maurice S. Nelson, Jr., as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of EMJ, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) Information contained in this Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of EMJ.



Date: November 10, 2005



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|/s/    MAURICE S. NELSON,
JR.                                                        
|Maurice S. Nelson, Jr. President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating
Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EMJ and will be retained by EMJ and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF
THE TRUSTEE*
OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as explained in Note 3
to the Trusts financial statements, in accordance with Securities and Exchange
Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 47, released September 16, 1982, the Trust
prepares its financial statements in a manner that differs from generally accepted
accounting principles; such presentation is customary to other royalty trusts); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
 COMPASS BANK, AS TRUSTEE OF THE
SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTBy:
    
    /s/ Lee Ann AndersonName:
    
    Lee Ann AndersonTitle:
    
    Vice President and Senior Trust OfficerDate: March 1, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5627 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5627

  To amend the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act to assist 
small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 2010

 Mr. Rahall (for himself, Mr. Filner, Ms. Norton, Ms. Corrine Brown of 
    Florida, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, and Mr. Cummings) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act to assist 
small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Commerce for Defenders Act of 
2010''.

SEC. 2. SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY VETERANS.

    Title IV of the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act (Public 
Law 111-147) is amended by adding at the end the following:

 ``Subtitle F--Small Business Concerns Owned and Controlled by Veterans

``SEC. 461. SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY VETERANS.

    ``(a) General Rule.--In the awarding of contracts and subcontracts 
using amounts made available under titles I, III, and V of SAFETEA-LU 
(Public Law 109-59), subtitles A and C of this title, and section 403 
of title 23, United States Code, a preference shall be given to the use 
of small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans.
    ``(b) Eligibility.--A small business concern owned and controlled 
by veterans shall be eligible for the preference under subsection (a) 
if such concern is listed in the database maintained pursuant to 
section 8127(f) of title 38, United States Code.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF WMS INDUSTRIES INC.



The following is a list of all direct and indirect subsidiaries of the Company and their jurisdictions of incorporation as of
June 30, 2010. The name of each indirect subsidiary is indented under the name of its parent company.



|                                               |  |                                        
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Subsidiary                                     |  | Jurisdiction of
Incorporation/Formation
|                                               | 
|WMS Gaming Inc.                                |  | Delaware                               
|WMS Gaming (Canada) Ltd.                       |  | New Brunswick, Canada                  
|WMS Gaming International, S.L.                 |  | Spain                                  
|WMS Gaming Australia PTY Ltd.                  |  | Australia                              
|WMS Gaming Africa (Pty) Ltd.                   |  | South Africa                           
|WMS Gaming (UK) Limited                        |  | United Kingdom                         
|WMS Gaming Slovakia, s.r.o.                    |  | Slovakia                               
|WMS Gaming Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.          |  | Mexico                                 
|WMS Gaming Mexico Services, S. de R.L. de C.V. |  | Mexico                                 
|Lenc-Smith Inc.                                |  | Delaware                               
|Williams Electronics Games, Inc.               |  | Delaware                               
|WMS Finance Inc.                               |  | Delaware                               
|WMS International Holdings Inc.                |  | Delaware                               
|Orion Financement Company B.V.                 |  | Netherlands                            
|Orion Real Estate B.V.                         |  | Netherlands                            
|Orion Assembly B.V.                            |  | Netherlands                            
|Mercur Holland B.V.                            |  | Netherlands                            
|Orion Gaming B.V.                              |  | Netherlands                            
|WMS Gaming Services Europe, S.L.               |  | Spain                                  
|Systems in Progress Holding GmbH               |  | Austria                                
|WMS Asia Holdings Inc.                         |  | Delaware                               
|WMS International (Macau) Limited              |  | Macau                                  
|WMS Gaming Solutions India Private Limited     |  | India                                  
|WMS Alderney 1 Limited                         |  | Alderney                               
|WMS Alderney 2 Ltd.                            |  | Alderney                               
|WMS Marketing UK Ltd.                          |  | United Kingdom
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 30, 2013

NO. 03-12-00810-CR

Styron Earl Hale, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND ROSE

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the judgment of conviction. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is in all things affirmed; and 

it appearing that the appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs 

is made, and that this decision be certified below for observance.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL REPORTS

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

** **

I, William S. Johnson, certify that:

 

1.            I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EARLE M. JORGENSEN COMPANY (“EMJ”);

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of EMJ as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

 

4.             EMJ’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for EMJ and have:

 

(d)                                 Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(e)                                  Evaluated the effectiveness of EMJ’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(f)                                    Disclosed in this report any changes inEMJ’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during EMJ’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, EMJ’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                 EMJ’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to EMJ’s auditors and the auditcommittee of EMJ’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(c)                                  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect EMJ’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(d)                                 Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in EMJ’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: August 1, 2003

 

 
| /s/ William S. Johnson                                                    |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| William S. Johnson  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000052617
<NAME> IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          51,999
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          34,595
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                96,094
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      8,575
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          36,154
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            36,400
<LOANS>                                        939,025
<ALLOWANCE>                                     10,054
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,993,011
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,230,499
<SHORT-TERM>                                   410,971
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            101,032
<LONG-TERM>                                     29,585
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           48,107
<PREFERRED>                                      1,387
<COMMON>                                        29,965
<OTHER-SE>                                     141,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,993,011
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 39,532
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,055
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                36,907
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                78,494
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              20,010
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,671
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           41,823
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,254
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                111,972
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,614
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      30,614
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,987
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .81<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .80<F1>
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     .05<F2>
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,220
<LOANS-PAST>                                       847
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,555
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      941
<RECOVERIES>                                       186
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               10,054
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            10,054
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          5,478
<FN>
<F1>Information not in 1,000 and earnings per share reported in basic and diluted
<F2>Information not in 1,000
</FN>


</TABLE>
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20870

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RODERICK ANTHONY RICE,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

H-96-CR-27-1)

April 21, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roderick Rice appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute cocaine base. Rice contends (1) that he was given

insufficient notice of the enhancement of his sentence under the career offender

guideline; (2) that the district court erred in calculating his criminal history score

and in applying the career offender guideline or, alternatively, that he deserved a

downward departure because his criminal history category overrepresented his past
 

1 United States v. Abreo, 30 F.3d 29 (5th Cir. 1994); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

2

criminal conduct; (3) that there was insufficient evidence to support the district

court’s finding that the substance involved was “crack”cocaine; and (4) that the

district court erred in failing to reduce his sentence based on his minor role in the

offense. In his plea agreement, Rice waived the right to appeal his sentence or the

manner in which it was determined, reserving only the right to appeal an upward

departure. The district court sentenced Rice within the computed guideline range.

Rice’s contention that his waiver is invalid due to inadequate consideration on the

part of the government is devoid of merit. Because Rice waived the right to appeal

his sentence, his appeal is dismissed as frivolous.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.
B I L L O F C O S T S

THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

No. 13-15-00322-CV

Jack Storm

v.

Ronnie King

(No. 2012CCV-60514-3 IN COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 3 OF NUECES COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

FILING

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51 FEE

INDIGENT

$10.00

$20.00

$100.00

$50.00

$25.00

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

Balance of costs owing to the Thirteenth Court of Appeals, Corpus Christi, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DORIAN E. RAMIREZ, CLERK OF THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct

copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF 

TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the 

same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand 

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for 

the Thirteenth District of Texas, this October 

13, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ameriprise Certificate Company (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Abu M. Arif, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jason S. Bartylla, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:November 9, 2020By:/s/ Abu M. ArifAbu M. ArifChief Executive Officer


Date:November 9, 2020By:/s/ Jason S. BartyllaJason S. BartyllaChief Financial Officer
#### FRED SELBY, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 8090

February 26, 1975

531 P.2d 1356

*Morgan D. Harris,*Public Defender, and *Kelly H. Swanson,*Deputy, Clark County, for Appellant.

*Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *George E. Holt,*District Attorney, and *Daniel M. Seaton,*Chief Deputy, Clark County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

In this appeal from an order denying a pretrial petition for habeas corpus, we believe the evidence adduced at the preliminary examination justified the magistrate’s determination *118that there was probable cause to hold appellant for trial. NRS 171.206. See concurring opinion by Zenoff, J., in Franklin v. State, 89 Nev. 382, 389, 513 P.2d 1252, 1257 (1973).

“[W]e are not now doncerned with the prospect that the evidence presently in the record may, by itself, be insufficient to sustain a conviction.” McDonald v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 326, 327, 512 P.2d 774, 775 (1973).

The order denying habeas relief is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                          16,914
<SECURITIES>                                    28,085
<RECEIVABLES>                                  644,929
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,494
<INVENTORY>                                    634,435
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,154,191
<PP&E>                                       1,851,882
<DEPRECIATION>                                 816,424
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,943,558
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          954,605
<BONDS>                                        567,030
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,750
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,255,639
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,943,558
<SALES>                                      6,559,284
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,559,284
<CGS>                                        6,329,314
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,329,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               128,773
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,645
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 76,552
<INCOME-TAX>                                    29,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             47,452
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (14,815)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,637
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ameriprise Certificate Company (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2019 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Abu M. Arif , as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jason S. Bartylla , as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date:November 12, 2019By:/s/ Abu M. ArifAbu M. ArifChief Executive Officer


Date:November 12, 2019By:/s/ Jason S. BartyllaJason S. BartyllaChief Financial Officer