alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Bureau of Labor Statistics

The ninth meeting of the Federal Economic Statistics Advisory Committee will be held on December 9, 2005 in the Postal Square Building, 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Washington, DC.

The Federal Economic Statistics Advisory Committee is a technical committee composed of economists, statisticians, and behavioral scientists who are recognized for their attainments and objectivity in their respective fields. Committee members are called upon to analyze issues involved in producing Federal economic statistics and recommend practices that will lead to optimum efficiency, effectiveness, and cooperation among the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis and Bureau of the Census.

The meeting will be held in Meeting Rooms 1 and 2 of the Postal Square Building Conference Center. The schedule and agenda for the meeting are as follows:

9 a.m. Opening session.

9:30 a.m. Measuring the cost of owner-occupied housing.

1 p.m. Report from working group on the CPS-CES discrepancy.

1:30 p.m. Service-sector expansion and non-residential construction initiative in the PPI.

2 p.m. Priorities for future meetings.

2:45 p.m. Treatment of catastrophic events in Federal statistical programs.

4:45 p.m. Conclude (approximate time).

The meeting is open to the public. Any questions concerning the meeting should be directed to Margaret Johnson, Federal Economic Statistics Advisory Committee, on Area Code (202) 691-5600. Individuals with disabilities, who need special accommodations, should contact Ms. Johnson at least two days prior to the meeting date.

Signed at Washington, DC the 3rd day of November 2005.

Kathleen P. Utgoff,

Commissioner of Labor Statistics.

[FR Doc. 05-22447 Filed 11-9-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
FIRST
      M
& F CORPORATION





**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATIONS**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of First M&F Corporation (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hugh S. Potts,
      Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
      knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:





A.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





B.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:  March
      12,
      2008




/s/
              Hugh S. Potts, Jr.Hugh
                S. Potts, Jr.Chairman
              and Chief Executive Officer
818 A.2d 1078

#### Steven Howard OKEN v. STATE of Maryland.

Misc. No. 28

Sept. Term 2002.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

March 11, 2003.

Fred Warren Bennett, Michael E. Lawlor of Bennett & Nathans, LLP, Greenbelt; Christopher M. Davis, Davis & Davis, Washington, DC, for appellant.

Ann N. Bosse, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., on brief), Baltimore, for Appellee.

Submitted before BELL, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RAKER, WILNER CATHELL, HARRELL and BATTAGLIA, JJ.

ORDER

The Court having considered that application for leave to appeal from the denial of a motion to reopen post-conviction case and the response filed thereto in the above-captioned case, it is this 11th day of March, 2003,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the application be, and it is hereby, DENIED.

Chief Judge BELL and Judge ELDRIDGE would grant the application.
EXHIBIT 23A CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8 No. 33-34442 and 333-156289) pertaining to stock option plans of AutoInfo,
Inc. of our report dated March 17, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of AutoInfo, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008. /s/ Dworken, Hillman,
 LaMorte & Sterczala, P.C.Shelton, Connecticut
Dworken, Hillman, LaMorte
 & Sterczala, P.C.March 20,
 2009
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-11330

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN RODRIQUEZ,

a/k/a Juan Rodriguez

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 94-CR-24-1

- - - - - - - - - -

October 22, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Rodriquez, Texas prisoner # 687029, appeals the

district court’s denial of his motion for his “Federal Sentence

to Run Concurrent with Remainder of State Sentence.” Rodriquez

contends that his federal sentence should have commenced when he

was remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal after

sentencing.

Rodriquez was “loaned” to federal authorities pursuant to a

writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum to answer the federal

charges pending against him. He was thereafter returned to Texas
No. 97-11330

-2-

authorities. See Causey v. Civiletti, 621 F.2d 691, 693 (5th

Cir. 1980)(if a defendant in state custody is turned over to

federal officials for federal prosecution, the state government’s

loss of jurisdiction is only temporary and the prisoner will be

returned to state custody at the completion of the federal

proceedings). 

“A sentence to a term of imprisonment commences on the date

the defendant is received in custody awaiting transportation to .

. . the official detention facility at which the sentence is to

be served.” 18 U.S.C. § 3585. Rodriquez could not be received

by the federal authorities for service of his federal sentence

until he was released by Texas authorities. See Blackshear v.

United States, 434 F.2d 58, 59 (5th Cir. 1970). The district

court’s denial of Rodriquez’s motion is 

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         400,497
<SECURITIES>                                   551,164
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,268,405
<ALLOWANCES>                                   896,432
<INVENTORY>                                 29,029,055
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            53,277,807
<PP&E>                                       6,551,497
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,934,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              60,896,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,273,852
<BONDS>                                     10,417,823
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       397,572
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,806,788
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                60,896,035
<SALES>                                     76,516,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            76,516,729
<CGS>                                       60,389,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               60,389,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,353,450
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             405,923
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,367,922
<INCOME-TAX>                                   959,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,408,922
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,408,922
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-14458-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Andre L. Stapler, Appellant.

(Submitted June 10, 1918;

decided June 14, 1918.)

Motion for re-argument denied. (See 223 N. Y. 692.)
#### STATE v. LOVEDAHL

No. 497.

Case below: 2 N.C. App. 513.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 20 November 1968.
Case 1:07-cv-03298-HB     Document 2      Filed 04/26/2007     Page 1 of 1
#### ALLEN CO. v. QUIP-MATIC, INC.

No. 303 PC

Case below: 47 NC App 40

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 September 1980. Motion of defendant to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction allowed 16 September 1980.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 217 (Thursday, November 10, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 68471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22265]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4980-N-45]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities to Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 10, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: November 3, 2005.
Mark R. Johnston,
Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.
[FR Doc. 05-22265 Filed 11-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
Exhibit 11.3


                          EARNINGS PER SHARE
                          PRIMARY COMPUTATION
         ($ in millions, except share and per share amounts)


                                                Quarter Ended
                                                   March 31,          
                                              ------------------
                                               1997       1996
                                              -------    -------
Basis for computation of earnings per 
 common and common equivalent shares:
   Earnings from continuing operations        $ 49.6     $ 40.4
   Deduct dividends on 4 Percent
    cumulative preferred stock                   (.1)       (.1)
                                              -------    -------
   Earnings from continuing operations
    available to common shareholders            49.5       40.3
   Discontinued operations                      (1.0)       8.0
                                              -------    -------

   Available for common shareholders          $ 48.5     $ 48.3 
                                              =======    =======




Number of shares:
  Weighted average shares outstanding     73,826,057  74,328,561
  Shares issuable upon exercise of
   stock options,net of shares assumed
   to be repurchased                       1,352,466   1,196,832
                                          ----------  ----------
 
                                          75,178,523  75,525,393
                                          ==========  ==========



Earnings per common share:
  Continuing operations                        $ .66       $ .53
  Discontinued operation                        (.01)        .11
                                               ------      -----

  Net earnings                                 $ .65       $ .64
                                               ======      =====
CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Roanoke Technology Corp. (the
"Company") on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, David Jeffrey Sternberg, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respect, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Jeffrey Sternberg
----------------------
Name:   Jeffrey Sternberg
Title:  Chief Executive Officer and
        Chief Financial Officer

Date:   April 6, 2005
Order entered December 30, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-01277-CV

IN RE LINDSEY MONJURE, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-54257-2016

ORDER

Before Justices Myers, Nowell, and Goldstein

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for 

writ of mandamus. We also DENY as moot relator’s emergency motion to stay the 

underlying proceedings. 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the second meeting of the American Health Information Community in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.) The American Health Information Community will advise the Secretary and recommend specific actions to achieve a common interoperability framework for health information technology (IT).

# DATES:

November 29, 2005 from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Department of Health and Human Services' Hubert H. Humphrey building (200 Independence Ave., Southwest, Washington, DC 20201), conference room 800.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A Web cast of the second Community meeting will be available on the NIH Web site at:                     *http://www.videocast.nih.gov/​.*

Dated: November 8, 2005.

Dana Haza,

Acting Director of the Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator.

[FR Doc. 05-22564 Filed 11-14-05; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
#### SCHAFRAN v. CLEANERS, INC.

No. 66 PC.

Case below: 19 N.C. App. 365.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 November 1973.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly Report of Strategic Internet
  Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
  June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
  hereof (the "Report"). I, Abbas Salih, Chief Financial Officer of the company,
  certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sction
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

|Dated: August 19, 2003 | /s/ Abbas Salih 
|---------------------- | ----------------
|                       |                 
|                       | Abbas Salih, CFO

---
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 1 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 2 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 3 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 4 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 5 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 6 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 7 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 8 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 9 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 10 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 11 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 12 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 13 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 14 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 15 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 16 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 17 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 18 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 19 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 20 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 21 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 22 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 23 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 24 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 25 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 26 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 27 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 28 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 29 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 30 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 31 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 32 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 33 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 34 of 35
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 86-3 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 35 of 35
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09-17-00079-CV

________________

IN RE BBX OPERATING, LLC

__________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding

1st District Court of Jasper County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 35,155

__________________________________________________________________

ORDER

Relator, BBX Operating, LLC, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a 

motion for emergency relief. The relator seeks a writ compelling the Honorable 

Craig Mixson, Judge of the 1st District Court of Jasper County, Texas, to vacate his 

orders of January 24, 2017, and March 1, 2017, which require BBX to make certain 

payments pursuant to a Rule 11 agreement. We note our jurisdiction over this matter 

and the parties. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004).

The Court finds that temporary relief is necessary to protect its jurisdiction of 

this matter. It is ORDERED that the trial court’s orders of January 24, 2017, and 

March 1, 2017, are STAYED until our opinion issues or until further order of this 
2

Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b). No bond is required of the relator as a condition 

to any relief herein granted.

The response of the real parties in interest is due to be filed on or before 

Monday, March 27, 2017.

MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF GRANTED.

ORDER ENTERED March 16, 2017.

PER CURIAM 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.