# L_2007216EN.01000301.xml

| 21.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 216/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 216/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 972/2007

of 20 August 2007

amending Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of cross-compliance, modulation and the integrated administration and control system provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) No 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001 (1), and in particular Article 145(c), (j), (k), (l), (m), (n) and (p) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Experienced gained since the introduction of the support schemes under Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 shows that Commission Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 (2) needs to be amended. Moreover, Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 needs to be clarified with regard to certain aspects and a number of simplifications of the rules should be introduced. In addition, provisions which have become obsolete, in particular because of the ending of the transitional period provided for in Article 71 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, should be deleted. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Experienced gained since the introduction of the support schemes under Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 shows that Commission Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 (2) needs to be amended. Moreover, Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 needs to be clarified with regard to certain aspects and a number of simplifications of the rules should be introduced. In addition, provisions which have become obsolete, in particular because of the ending of the transitional period provided for in Article 71 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, should be deleted.

| (2) | In order to ensure coherence between the obligations to declare separate use of parcels and the definition of the ‘agricultural parcel’, that definition should be clarified in the case where a separate declaration of the use of a parcel is required in the context of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004. In the case where that separate declaration of use concerns an area within a crop group, it is appropriate to clarify that the agricultural parcel is defined by that use. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In order to ensure coherence between the obligations to declare separate use of parcels and the definition of the ‘agricultural parcel’, that definition should be clarified in the case where a separate declaration of the use of a parcel is required in the context of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004. In the case where that separate declaration of use concerns an area within a crop group, it is appropriate to clarify that the agricultural parcel is defined by that use.

| (3) | Following the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union the definition of the term ‘new Member States’ needs to be updated. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Following the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union the definition of the term ‘new Member States’ needs to be updated.

| (4) | To ensure an adequate and reliable system for identification of the agricultural parcels, the provisions concerning the declaration of areas and in particular, the need to indicate the new boundaries of the reference parcels when the pre-printed application form is corrected, needs to be clarified. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

To ensure an adequate and reliable system for identification of the agricultural parcels, the provisions concerning the declaration of areas and in particular, the need to indicate the new boundaries of the reference parcels when the pre-printed application form is corrected, needs to be clarified.

| (5) | Following the amended rules for payments for energy crops and the introduction of the written declaration provided for in Article 33(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 of 29 October 2004 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 as regards the support schemes provided for in Titles IV and IVa of that Regulation and the use of land set aside for the production of raw materials (3) as amended by Regulation (EC) No 270/2007 (4), Articles 13 and 24 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 should be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Following the amended rules for payments for energy crops and the introduction of the written declaration provided for in Article 33(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 of 29 October 2004 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 as regards the support schemes provided for in Titles IV and IVa of that Regulation and the use of land set aside for the production of raw materials (3) as amended by Regulation (EC) No 270/2007 (4), Articles 13 and 24 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 should be amended accordingly.

| (6) | To verify the eligibility of certain payments, the farmer is required to send supporting documents when he is making his application. In order to simplify the administration for the farmer as well as for the national authorities, it should be possible for the national authority to require those documents directly from the source of information. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

To verify the eligibility of certain payments, the farmer is required to send supporting documents when he is making his application. In order to simplify the administration for the farmer as well as for the national authorities, it should be possible for the national authority to require those documents directly from the source of information.

| (7) | The integration of the banana reference amounts into the single payment scheme following the reform in the banana sector, as provided for by Council Regulation (EC) No 2013/2006 of 19 December 2006 amending Regulations (EEC) No 404/93, (EC) No 1782/2003 and (EC) No 247/2006 as regards the banana sector (5), requires flexibility concerning possible additions and amendments to the single application during the year 2007. However, the dates for the submission of the single application as provided for in Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 should be maintained in order to allow the Member States to organise their respective control programmes in due time. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

The integration of the banana reference amounts into the single payment scheme following the reform in the banana sector, as provided for by Council Regulation (EC) No 2013/2006 of 19 December 2006 amending Regulations (EEC) No 404/93, (EC) No 1782/2003 and (EC) No 247/2006 as regards the banana sector (5), requires flexibility concerning possible additions and amendments to the single application during the year 2007. However, the dates for the submission of the single application as provided for in Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 should be maintained in order to allow the Member States to organise their respective control programmes in due time.

| (8) | Based on experience, the current provisions for selection of farmers for on-the-spot checks and the control rates should be improved and more flexibility should be given to the Member States. This can be achieved by setting the requirement of a sample to at least 5 % of the farmers applying for the single payment scheme or the single area payment scheme. At the same time the Member State should assure that at least 3 % of the farmers applying for the aid schemes provided for under Titles III, IV and IVa of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 are selected for control. The control rate for farmers whose agricultural parcels are being declared by a producer group applying for hops payments should be adapted accordingly. For ovine and caprine premia, the introduction of a centralised database for registration of the animals justifies a decrease of the control rate. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

Based on experience, the current provisions for selection of farmers for on-the-spot checks and the control rates should be improved and more flexibility should be given to the Member States. This can be achieved by setting the requirement of a sample to at least 5 % of the farmers applying for the single payment scheme or the single area payment scheme. At the same time the Member State should assure that at least 3 % of the farmers applying for the aid schemes provided for under Titles III, IV and IVa of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 are selected for control. The control rate for farmers whose agricultural parcels are being declared by a producer group applying for hops payments should be adapted accordingly. For ovine and caprine premia, the introduction of a centralised database for registration of the animals justifies a decrease of the control rate.

| (9) | Taking too many pre-defined factors into account when doing the risk analyses to select a sample for on-the-spot controls could have an adverse effect on the sample. Therefore it is appropriate to give the responsibility to choose the risk factors to the competent authority as it is in a better position to chose the relevant risk factors. To assure relevant and efficient risk analyses, the effectiveness of the risk analyses should be assessed and updated on an annual basis taking into account the relevance of each risk factor, comparing the results of randomly and risk based selected samples and the specific situation in the Member State. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

Taking too many pre-defined factors into account when doing the risk analyses to select a sample for on-the-spot controls could have an adverse effect on the sample. Therefore it is appropriate to give the responsibility to choose the risk factors to the competent authority as it is in a better position to chose the relevant risk factors. To assure relevant and efficient risk analyses, the effectiveness of the risk analyses should be assessed and updated on an annual basis taking into account the relevance of each risk factor, comparing the results of randomly and risk based selected samples and the specific situation in the Member State.

| (10) | In order to make it possible to start the on-the-spot checks as early as possible in the year also before all information on the application forms is available, it should be possible for the competent authority to make a partial selection of the control sample based on already available information. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

In order to make it possible to start the on-the-spot checks as early as possible in the year also before all information on the application forms is available, it should be possible for the competent authority to make a partial selection of the control sample based on already available information.

| (11) | Rules for identification and registration of ovine and caprine animals have been introduced by Council Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 of 17 December 2003 establishing a system for the identification and registration of ovine and caprine animals and amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and Directives 92/102/EEC and 64/432/EEC (6). Those rules also apply on animals for which an aid is applied for. Therefore the relevant provisions in Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 should be updated. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

Rules for identification and registration of ovine and caprine animals have been introduced by Council Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 of 17 December 2003 establishing a system for the identification and registration of ovine and caprine animals and amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and Directives 92/102/EEC and 64/432/EEC (6). Those rules also apply on animals for which an aid is applied for. Therefore the relevant provisions in Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 should be updated.

| (12) | On-the-spot checks can either be performed by a visit on the farm or via remote sensing. The two ways of performing the checks have equal value and that should be clarified by streamlining the rules for the different ways of performing an on-the-spot check. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

On-the-spot checks can either be performed by a visit on the farm or via remote sensing. The two ways of performing the checks have equal value and that should be clarified by streamlining the rules for the different ways of performing an on-the-spot check.

| (13) | In order to ensure the quality of the on-the-spot checks, provisions to assure a minimum quality of measurements of areas should be introduced and the means used should be proven to assure a quality at least equivalent to that required by applicable technical standard as drawn up at Community level. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

In order to ensure the quality of the on-the-spot checks, provisions to assure a minimum quality of measurements of areas should be introduced and the means used should be proven to assure a quality at least equivalent to that required by applicable technical standard as drawn up at Community level.

| (14) | Experience has shown that the use of a perimeter tolerance when measuring parcels is the most appropriate. Focusing on the perimeter tolerance would furthermore simplify the systems and assure equal treatment of farmers in different Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

Experience has shown that the use of a perimeter tolerance when measuring parcels is the most appropriate. Focusing on the perimeter tolerance would furthermore simplify the systems and assure equal treatment of farmers in different Member States.

| (15) | Experience gained shows that it is possible to simplify the check of documents during the on-the-spot controls for livestock premia without jeopardising the quality of the check. However, if anomalies are found during the check, the time period for which the documents should be checked should be extended. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

Experience gained shows that it is possible to simplify the check of documents during the on-the-spot controls for livestock premia without jeopardising the quality of the check. However, if anomalies are found during the check, the time period for which the documents should be checked should be extended.

| (16) | In relation to applications for area related payments, differences between the total area declared in the application and the total area determined as eligible are often insignificant. To avoid a high number of minor adjustments of applications it should be provided that the aid application should not be adjusted to the area determined unless a certain level of differences is exceeded. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

In relation to applications for area related payments, differences between the total area declared in the application and the total area determined as eligible are often insignificant. To avoid a high number of minor adjustments of applications it should be provided that the aid application should not be adjusted to the area determined unless a certain level of differences is exceeded.

| (17) | The general principle applied is that there is no tolerance when a farmer has intentionally over declared his area. This can lead to an undesired reduction of the payment. A threshold should therefore be introduced also in case of intentional over declaration to assure proportionality when this over declaration is of a limited nature. Nevertheless, it is still an intentional act by the farmer and the tolerance should therefore be at very low level. |
| --- | --- |

(17)

The general principle applied is that there is no tolerance when a farmer has intentionally over declared his area. This can lead to an undesired reduction of the payment. A threshold should therefore be introduced also in case of intentional over declaration to assure proportionality when this over declaration is of a limited nature. Nevertheless, it is still an intentional act by the farmer and the tolerance should therefore be at very low level.

| (18) | When a Member State makes use of the possibility provided for in Article 69 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and the payments are granted for areas or livestock it is appropriate to apply the rules in Title IV of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004. This needs to be clarified and Article 63 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 should be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(18)

When a Member State makes use of the possibility provided for in Article 69 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and the payments are granted for areas or livestock it is appropriate to apply the rules in Title IV of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004. This needs to be clarified and Article 63 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 should be amended accordingly.

| (19) | In certain cases unduly allocations of entitlements did not affect the total value, but only the number of the entitlements of the farmer. In these cases, the Member States should correct the allocation or where appropriate the type of entitlements, without reducing the value hereof. The provision should only apply if the farmer could not have detected the error. |
| --- | --- |

(19)

In certain cases unduly allocations of entitlements did not affect the total value, but only the number of the entitlements of the farmer. In these cases, the Member States should correct the allocation or where appropriate the type of entitlements, without reducing the value hereof. The provision should only apply if the farmer could not have detected the error.

| (20) | The reporting requirements for the Member States should be updated to assure an efficient reporting of the checks of the production aids for starch potatoes, seeds and tobacco. |
| --- | --- |

(20)

The reporting requirements for the Member States should be updated to assure an efficient reporting of the checks of the production aids for starch potatoes, seeds and tobacco.

| (21) | Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(21)

Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (22) | The provision related to the inclusion of banana reference amounts into the single payment scheme provided for in this Regulation concerns aid applications relating to years or premium periods starting from 1 January 2007. This also applies for the provision including Bulgaria and Romania in the definition of ‘new Member States’. Those provisions should therefore apply from 1 January 2007. |
| --- | --- |

(22)

The provision related to the inclusion of banana reference amounts into the single payment scheme provided for in this Regulation concerns aid applications relating to years or premium periods starting from 1 January 2007. This also applies for the provision including Bulgaria and Romania in the definition of ‘new Member States’. Those provisions should therefore apply from 1 January 2007.

| (23) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Direct Payments, |
| --- | --- |

(23)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Direct Payments,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 is amended as follows:

| 1. | Article 2 is amended as follows:






  (a) | in the first paragraph, point (1)(a) is replaced by the following:






  ‘(1a) | “agricultural parcel”: shall mean a continuous area of land on which a single crop group is cultivated by a single farmer; however, where a separate declaration of the use of an area within a crop group is required in the context of this Regulation, that specific use shall further limit the agricultural parcel;’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.

Article 2 is amended as follows:

(a)

in the first paragraph, point (1)(a) is replaced by the following:

‘(1a)

“agricultural parcel”: shall mean a continuous area of land on which a single crop group is cultivated by a single farmer; however, where a separate declaration of the use of an area within a crop group is required in the context of this Regulation, that specific use shall further limit the agricultural parcel;’

| (b) | the second paragraph is replaced by the following:
  ‘For the purposes of this Regulation, “new Member States” shall mean Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovenia and Slovakia.’; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the second paragraph is replaced by the following:

‘For the purposes of this Regulation, “new Member States” shall mean Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovenia and Slovakia.’;

| 2. | Article 8(2) is replaced by the following:

  ‘2.   Where an area is used in common, the competent authorities shall notionally allocate it between the individual farmers in proportion to their use or right of use of it.’; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 8(2) is replaced by the following:

‘2.   Where an area is used in common, the competent authorities shall notionally allocate it between the individual farmers in proportion to their use or right of use of it.’;

| 3. | in the second subparagraph of Article 12(4), the first sentence is replaced by the following:

  ‘If the correction relates to the reference parcel area, the farmer shall declare the up-to-date area of each agricultural parcel concerned and where necessary indicate the new boundaries of the reference parcel.’; |
| --- | --- |

3.

in the second subparagraph of Article 12(4), the first sentence is replaced by the following:

‘If the correction relates to the reference parcel area, the farmer shall declare the up-to-date area of each agricultural parcel concerned and where necessary indicate the new boundaries of the reference parcel.’;

| 4. | Article 13 is amended as follows:






  (a) | Paragraph 6 is replaced by the following:

  ‘6.   In the case of an application for energy crops provided for in Chapter 5 of Title IV of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, the single application shall contain a copy of the contract the applicant has concluded with a collector or a first processor pursuant to Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 or, in case of application of Article 33(2) of that Regulation, a written declaration in accordance with that Article.’; |
| --- | --- | --- |

4.

Article 13 is amended as follows:

(a)

Paragraph 6 is replaced by the following:

‘6.   In the case of an application for energy crops provided for in Chapter 5 of Title IV of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, the single application shall contain a copy of the contract the applicant has concluded with a collector or a first processor pursuant to Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 or, in case of application of Article 33(2) of that Regulation, a written declaration in accordance with that Article.’;

| (b) | the following paragraph is added:

  ‘14.   The information required in the supporting documents set out in this Article may, when possible, be requested directly from the source of the information by the competent authority.’; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the following paragraph is added:

‘14.   The information required in the supporting documents set out in this Article may, when possible, be requested directly from the source of the information by the competent authority.’;

| 5. | Article 15 is amended as follows:






  (a) | in paragraph 1, the third and fourth subparagraphs are replaced by the following:
  ‘Where the amendments referred to in the first and second subparagraphs have a bearing on any supporting documents or contracts to be submitted, the related amendments to such documents or contracts shall also be allowed.’; |
| --- | --- | --- |

5.

Article 15 is amended as follows:

(a)

in paragraph 1, the third and fourth subparagraphs are replaced by the following:

‘Where the amendments referred to in the first and second subparagraphs have a bearing on any supporting documents or contracts to be submitted, the related amendments to such documents or contracts shall also be allowed.’;

| (b) | in paragraph 2, the second subparagraph is replaced by the following:
  ‘However, in respect of the year 2007, the amendments made in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article shall be notified to the competent authority by 15 June at the latest in those Member States which apply Article 48c(8) of Regulation (EC) No 795/2004. In duly justified cases, notifications of such amendments shall be accepted until 20 days following the publication of Regulation (EC) No 972/2007 (*1) in the Official Journal of the European Union.

  (*1)  
  OJ L 216, 21.8.2007, p. 3.’
  " |
| --- | --- |

(b)

in paragraph 2, the second subparagraph is replaced by the following:

‘However, in respect of the year 2007, the amendments made in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article shall be notified to the competent authority by 15 June at the latest in those Member States which apply Article 48c(8) of Regulation (EC) No 795/2004. In duly justified cases, notifications of such amendments shall be accepted until 20 days following the publication of Regulation (EC) No 972/2007 (*1) in the Official Journal of the European Union.

*1

Official Journal of the European Union

(*1)  
  OJ L 216, 21.8.2007, p. 3.’
  "

*1

| 6. | in Article 17a(2), the second subparagraph is deleted; |
| --- | --- |

6.

in Article 17a(2), the second subparagraph is deleted;

| 7. | Article 21(3) is deleted; |
| --- | --- |

7.

Article 21(3) is deleted;

| 8. | Article 24(1)(f) is replaced by the following:






  ‘(f) | where supporting documents, contracts, growing declarations or written declarations in accordance with Article 33(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 have to be submitted and where applicable, between the agricultural parcels as declared in the single application and in the supporting documents, contracts, growing declarations or written declarations in accordance with Article 33(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 to verify the eligibility for aid of the area;’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

8.

Article 24(1)(f) is replaced by the following:

‘(f)

where supporting documents, contracts, growing declarations or written declarations in accordance with Article 33(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 have to be submitted and where applicable, between the agricultural parcels as declared in the single application and in the supporting documents, contracts, growing declarations or written declarations in accordance with Article 33(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 to verify the eligibility for aid of the area;’

| 9. | Article 26 is amended as follows:






  (a) | Paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:

  ‘1.   The total number of on-the-spot checks carried out each year shall cover at least 5 % of all farmers applying for the single payment scheme or the single area payment scheme.
  The Member States shall assure that on-the-spot checks cover at least 3 % of the farmers applying for aid under each of other area related aid schemes provided for under Titles III, IV and IVa of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003.’; |
| --- | --- | --- |

9.

Article 26 is amended as follows:

(a)

Paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:

‘1.   The total number of on-the-spot checks carried out each year shall cover at least 5 % of all farmers applying for the single payment scheme or the single area payment scheme.

The Member States shall assure that on-the-spot checks cover at least 3 % of the farmers applying for aid under each of other area related aid schemes provided for under Titles III, IV and IVa of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003.’;

| (b) | Paragraph 2 is amended as follows:






  (i) | point (c) is replaced by the following:






  ‘(c) | 5 % of all farmers applying for aid under the ovine/caprine aid scheme irrespective of whether the aid applications are being submitted as part of the single application or independently; those on-the-spot checks shall also cover at least 5 % of all animals for which aid is applied for; however, where the computerised database for ovine/caprine animals provided for in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 does not offer the level of assurance and implementation necessary for the proper management of the aid schemes involved, the percentage shall be increased to 10 % of the farmers.’; |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

(b)

Paragraph 2 is amended as follows:

(i)

point (c) is replaced by the following:

‘(c)

5 % of all farmers applying for aid under the ovine/caprine aid scheme irrespective of whether the aid applications are being submitted as part of the single application or independently; those on-the-spot checks shall also cover at least 5 % of all animals for which aid is applied for; however, where the computerised database for ovine/caprine animals provided for in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 does not offer the level of assurance and implementation necessary for the proper management of the aid schemes involved, the percentage shall be increased to 10 % of the farmers.’;

| (ii) | point (e) is replaced by the following:






  ‘(e) | 3 % of all farmers whose agricultural parcels are being declared by a producer group applying for hops payments in accordance with Article 15a.’; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(ii)

point (e) is replaced by the following:

‘(e)

3 % of all farmers whose agricultural parcels are being declared by a producer group applying for hops payments in accordance with Article 15a.’;

| 10. | Article 27 is amended as follows:






  (a) | The first subparagraph of paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:

  ‘Control samples for on-the-spot checks under this Regulation shall be selected by the competent authority on the basis of a risk analysis and representativeness of the aid applications submitted. The effectiveness of risk analysis shall be assessed and updated on an annual basis:






  (a) | by establishing the relevance of each risk factor; |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.

Article 27 is amended as follows:

(a)

The first subparagraph of paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:

‘Control samples for on-the-spot checks under this Regulation shall be selected by the competent authority on the basis of a risk analysis and representativeness of the aid applications submitted. The effectiveness of risk analysis shall be assessed and updated on an annual basis:

(a)

by establishing the relevance of each risk factor;

| (b) | by comparing the results of the risk based and randomly selected sample referred to in the second subparagraph; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

by comparing the results of the risk based and randomly selected sample referred to in the second subparagraph;

| (c) | by taking into account the specific situation in the Member State.’; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

by taking into account the specific situation in the Member State.’;

| (b) | Paragraph 2 is deleted; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Paragraph 2 is deleted;

| (c) | the following paragraph is added:

  ‘4.   A partial selection of the control sample may, where appropriate, be made before the end of the application period in question, on the basis of available information. The provisional sample shall be completed when all relevant applications are available.’; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the following paragraph is added:

‘4.   A partial selection of the control sample may, where appropriate, be made before the end of the application period in question, on the basis of available information. The provisional sample shall be completed when all relevant applications are available.’;

| 11. | in Article 28(1), point (d) is replaced by the following:






  ‘(d) | the number and type of animals found and, where applicable, the ear tag numbers, entries in the register and in the computerised databases for bovine and/or ovine/caprine animals and any supporting documents checked, the results of the checks and, where applicable, particular observations in respect of individual animals and/or their identification code.’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

11.

in Article 28(1), point (d) is replaced by the following:

‘(d)

the number and type of animals found and, where applicable, the ear tag numbers, entries in the register and in the computerised databases for bovine and/or ovine/caprine animals and any supporting documents checked, the results of the checks and, where applicable, particular observations in respect of individual animals and/or their identification code.’

| 12. | Article 29 is replaced by the following:

  ‘Article 29
  Elements of on-the-spot checks
  On-the-spot checks shall cover all the agricultural parcels for which aid is requested under aid schemes listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, except those related to applications for seed aid in accordance with Article 99 of that Regulation. Nevertheless, the actual determination of the areas as part of an on-the-spot check may be limited to a sample of at least 50 % of the agricultural parcels for which an application has been submitted under the aid schemes established in Titles III, IV and IVa of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 provided that the sample guarantees a reliable and representative level of control both in respect of area checked and aid claimed. When this sample check reveals anomalies the sample of agricultural parcels actually inspected shall be increased.
  Member States may make use of remote sensing and Global Navigation Satellite Systems techniques.’; |
| --- | --- |

12.

Article 29 is replaced by the following:

‘Article 29

Elements of on-the-spot checks

On-the-spot checks shall cover all the agricultural parcels for which aid is requested under aid schemes listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, except those related to applications for seed aid in accordance with Article 99 of that Regulation. Nevertheless, the actual determination of the areas as part of an on-the-spot check may be limited to a sample of at least 50 % of the agricultural parcels for which an application has been submitted under the aid schemes established in Titles III, IV and IVa of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 provided that the sample guarantees a reliable and representative level of control both in respect of area checked and aid claimed. When this sample check reveals anomalies the sample of agricultural parcels actually inspected shall be increased.

Member States may make use of remote sensing and Global Navigation Satellite Systems techniques.’;

| 13. | Article 30(1) is replaced by the following:

  ‘1.   Agricultural parcel areas shall be determined by any means proven to assure measurement of quality at least equivalent to that required by applicable technical standard, as drawn up at Community level.
  A measurement tolerance shall be defined by a buffer of maximum 1,5 m applied to the perimeter of the agricultural parcel. The maximum tolerance with regard to each agricultural parcel shall not, in absolute terms, exceed 1,0 ha.
  The tolerance provided for in the second subparagraph shall not apply to olive parcels for which the area is expressed in olive GIS-ha in accordance with points 2 and 3 of Annex XXIV to Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004.’; |
| --- | --- |

13.

Article 30(1) is replaced by the following:

‘1.   Agricultural parcel areas shall be determined by any means proven to assure measurement of quality at least equivalent to that required by applicable technical standard, as drawn up at Community level.

A measurement tolerance shall be defined by a buffer of maximum 1,5 m applied to the perimeter of the agricultural parcel. The maximum tolerance with regard to each agricultural parcel shall not, in absolute terms, exceed 1,0 ha.

The tolerance provided for in the second subparagraph shall not apply to olive parcels for which the area is expressed in olive GIS-ha in accordance with points 2 and 3 of Annex XXIV to Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004.’;

| 14. | Article 32 is replaced by the following:

  ‘Article 32
  Remote sensing

  1.   Where a Member State applies the possibility, provided for in the second paragraph of Article 29, to carry out on-the-spot checks by remote sensing, it shall:






  (a) | perform photo interpretation of satellite images or aerial photographs of all agricultural parcels per application to be checked with a view to recognising the ground cover and measuring the area; |
| --- | --- | --- |

14.

Article 32 is replaced by the following:

‘Article 32

Remote sensing

1.   Where a Member State applies the possibility, provided for in the second paragraph of Article 29, to carry out on-the-spot checks by remote sensing, it shall:

(a)

perform photo interpretation of satellite images or aerial photographs of all agricultural parcels per application to be checked with a view to recognising the ground cover and measuring the area;

| (b) | carry out physical inspections in the field of all agricultural parcels for which photo interpretation does not make it possible to verify the accuracy of the declaration to the satisfaction of the competent authority. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

carry out physical inspections in the field of all agricultural parcels for which photo interpretation does not make it possible to verify the accuracy of the declaration to the satisfaction of the competent authority.

2.   The additional checks referred to in Article 26(3) shall be carried out by means of traditional on-the-spot checks if it is no longer possible to carry them out by means of remote sensing within the current year.’;

| 15. | in Article 33a, the first paragraph is replaced by the following:
  ‘The on-the-spot checks referred to in Article 26(2)(e) shall be carried out by way of application of the provisions of Article 29, Article 30(1), the first and second subparagraphs of Article 30(2), Article 30(3), Article 30(4) and Article 32 mutatis mutandis.’; |
| --- | --- |

15.

in Article 33a, the first paragraph is replaced by the following:

‘The on-the-spot checks referred to in Article 26(2)(e) shall be carried out by way of application of the provisions of Article 29, Article 30(1), the first and second subparagraphs of Article 30(2), Article 30(3), Article 30(4) and Article 32 mutatis mutandis.’;

mutatis mutandis

| 16. | Article 35 is amended as follows:






  (a) | in the first subparagraph of paragraph 2(b), the first and second indents are replaced by the following:






  ‘— | of the correctness of entries in the register and the notifications to the computerised database for bovine animals on the basis of a sample of supporting documents such as purchase and sales invoices, slaughter certificates, veterinary certificates and, where applicable, animal passports, in relation to animals for which aid applications were submitted in the six months prior to the on-the-spot check; however if anomalies are found, the check shall be extended to 12 months prior to the on-the-spot check, |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.

Article 35 is amended as follows:

(a)

in the first subparagraph of paragraph 2(b), the first and second indents are replaced by the following:

‘—

of the correctness of entries in the register and the notifications to the computerised database for bovine animals on the basis of a sample of supporting documents such as purchase and sales invoices, slaughter certificates, veterinary certificates and, where applicable, animal passports, in relation to animals for which aid applications were submitted in the six months prior to the on-the-spot check; however if anomalies are found, the check shall be extended to 12 months prior to the on-the-spot check,

| — | that information held in the computerised database for bovine animals corresponds to the information given in the register on the basis of a sample in relation to animals for which aid applications were submitted in the six months prior to the on-the-spot check; however if anomalies are found the check shall be extended to 12 months prior to the on-the-spot check,’; |
| --- | --- |

—

that information held in the computerised database for bovine animals corresponds to the information given in the register on the basis of a sample in relation to animals for which aid applications were submitted in the six months prior to the on-the-spot check; however if anomalies are found the check shall be extended to 12 months prior to the on-the-spot check,’;

| (b) | Paragraph 2(c) is replaced by the following:






  ‘(c) | in relation to the ovine/caprine aid scheme:






  — | a check on the basis of the register that all the animals for which aid application were submitted have been kept on the holding throughout the retention period, |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

(b)

Paragraph 2(c) is replaced by the following:

‘(c)

in relation to the ovine/caprine aid scheme:

—

a check on the basis of the register that all the animals for which aid application were submitted have been kept on the holding throughout the retention period,

| — | a check of the correctness of entries in the register in the six months prior to the on-the-spot check, based on a sample of supporting documents such as purchase and sales invoices and veterinary certificates covering the six months prior to the on-the-spot check; however if anomalies are found the check shall be extended to 12 months prior to the on-the-spot check.’; |
| --- | --- |

—

a check of the correctness of entries in the register in the six months prior to the on-the-spot check, based on a sample of supporting documents such as purchase and sales invoices and veterinary certificates covering the six months prior to the on-the-spot check; however if anomalies are found the check shall be extended to 12 months prior to the on-the-spot check.’;

| 17. | in Article 38, the first sentence is replaced by the following:

  ‘As regards the additional payment to be granted for specific types of farming or for quality production as provided for in Article 69 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, the Member States shall, where appropriate, apply the provisions of this Title.’; |
| --- | --- |

17.

in Article 38, the first sentence is replaced by the following:

‘As regards the additional payment to be granted for specific types of farming or for quality production as provided for in Article 69 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, the Member States shall, where appropriate, apply the provisions of this Title.’;

| 18. | in Article 49(1), points (d), (e) and (f) are deleted; |
| --- | --- |

18.

in Article 49(1), points (d), (e) and (f) are deleted;

| 19. | Article 50 is amended as follows:






  (a) | In paragraph 3, the following subparagraphs are added:
  ‘However, without prejudice to Article 29 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, if the difference between the total area determined and the total area declared for payment under aid schemes established in Titles III, IV and IVa of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 is less than or equal to 0,1 hectare, the area determined shall be set equal to the area declared. For this calculation only over-declarations of areas at crop group level shall be taken into account.
  The provision referred to in the second subparagraph shall not apply where that difference represents more than 20 % of the total area declared for payments.’; |
| --- | --- | --- |

19.

Article 50 is amended as follows:

(a)

In paragraph 3, the following subparagraphs are added:

‘However, without prejudice to Article 29 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, if the difference between the total area determined and the total area declared for payment under aid schemes established in Titles III, IV and IVa of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 is less than or equal to 0,1 hectare, the area determined shall be set equal to the area declared. For this calculation only over-declarations of areas at crop group level shall be taken into account.

The provision referred to in the second subparagraph shall not apply where that difference represents more than 20 % of the total area declared for payments.’;

| (b) | Paragraph 6 is deleted; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Paragraph 6 is deleted;

| 20. | in Article 53, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:
  ‘Where differences between the area declared and the area determined in accordance with Article 50(3), (4)(b) and (5) result from irregularities committed intentionally, the aid to which the farmer would have been entitled pursuant to Article 50(3), (4)(b) and (5) shall not be granted for the calendar year in question under the aid scheme concerned if that difference is more than 0,5 % of the area determined or more than one hectare.’; |
| --- | --- |

20.

in Article 53, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:

‘Where differences between the area declared and the area determined in accordance with Article 50(3), (4)(b) and (5) result from irregularities committed intentionally, the aid to which the farmer would have been entitled pursuant to Article 50(3), (4)(b) and (5) shall not be granted for the calendar year in question under the aid scheme concerned if that difference is more than 0,5 % of the area determined or more than one hectare.’;

| 21. | in the first paragraph of Article 54a, the introductory phrase is replaced by the following:

  ‘Where it is found that tobacco was not replanted on the parcel indicated in the cultivation contract by 20 June of the year of harvest:’; |
| --- | --- |

21.

in the first paragraph of Article 54a, the introductory phrase is replaced by the following:

‘Where it is found that tobacco was not replanted on the parcel indicated in the cultivation contract by 20 June of the year of harvest:’;

| 22. | Article 55 and 56 are deleted; |
| --- | --- |

22.

Article 55 and 56 are deleted;

| 23. | in Article 58(1), the second sentence is replaced by the following:

  ‘However, suckler cows or heifers in respect of which aid is claimed in accordance with Article 125 or Article 129 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 may be replaced during the retention period within the limits provided for in those Articles without the loss of the right to the payment of the aid applied for.’; |
| --- | --- |

23.

in Article 58(1), the second sentence is replaced by the following:

‘However, suckler cows or heifers in respect of which aid is claimed in accordance with Article 125 or Article 129 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 may be replaced during the retention period within the limits provided for in those Articles without the loss of the right to the payment of the aid applied for.’;

| 24. | Article 63 is replaced by the following:

  ‘Article 63
  Findings in relation to the additional payment
  As regards the additional payment to be granted for specific types of farming or for quality production as provided for in Article 69 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, the Member States shall provide for reductions and exclusions which shall, in substance, be equivalent to those provided for in this Title. In case area-related or livestock payments are granted the provisions of this Part shall apply mutatis mutandis.’ |
| --- | --- |

24.

Article 63 is replaced by the following:

‘Article 63

Findings in relation to the additional payment

As regards the additional payment to be granted for specific types of farming or for quality production as provided for in Article 69 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, the Member States shall provide for reductions and exclusions which shall, in substance, be equivalent to those provided for in this Title. In case area-related or livestock payments are granted the provisions of this Part shall apply mutatis mutandis.’

| 25. | in Article 73a, the following paragraph 2a is inserted:

  ‘2a.   Where, for the purpose of the application of paragraphs 1 and 2 it is established that the number of the entitlements allocated to a farmer in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 795/2004 is incorrect, and where the unduly allocation has no impact on the total value of the entitlements the farmer received, the Member State shall recalculate the payment entitlements and where appropriate correct the type of the entitlements allocated to the farmer. However, this shall not apply if the errors could reasonably have been detected by the farmers.’; |
| --- | --- |

25.

in Article 73a, the following paragraph 2a is inserted:

‘2a.   Where, for the purpose of the application of paragraphs 1 and 2 it is established that the number of the entitlements allocated to a farmer in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 795/2004 is incorrect, and where the unduly allocation has no impact on the total value of the entitlements the farmer received, the Member State shall recalculate the payment entitlements and where appropriate correct the type of the entitlements allocated to the farmer. However, this shall not apply if the errors could reasonably have been detected by the farmers.’;

| 26. | Article 76(1) is replaced by the following:

  ‘1.   Member States shall submit to the Commission by 15 July each year at the latest, for the aid schemes covered by the Integrated Administrative Control System, a report covering the previous calendar year and, in particular, relating to the following points:






  (a) | the state of implementation of the integrated system, including in particular the options chosen for the control of the cross-compliance requirements and the competent control bodies responsible for the controls of the cross-compliance requirements and conditions; |
| --- | --- | --- |

26.

Article 76(1) is replaced by the following:

‘1.   Member States shall submit to the Commission by 15 July each year at the latest, for the aid schemes covered by the Integrated Administrative Control System, a report covering the previous calendar year and, in particular, relating to the following points:

(a)

the state of implementation of the integrated system, including in particular the options chosen for the control of the cross-compliance requirements and the competent control bodies responsible for the controls of the cross-compliance requirements and conditions;

| (b) | the number of claimants as well as the total area, total number of animals and the total of quantities; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the number of claimants as well as the total area, total number of animals and the total of quantities;

| (c) | the number of claimants as well as the total area, the total number of animals and the total of quantities, covered by checks; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the number of claimants as well as the total area, the total number of animals and the total of quantities, covered by checks;

| (d) | the result of the checks carried out, indicating the reductions and exclusions applied pursuant to Title IV; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

the result of the checks carried out, indicating the reductions and exclusions applied pursuant to Title IV;

| (e) | the results of the checks relating to cross-compliance in accordance with Chapter III of Title III.’ |
| --- | --- |

(e)

the results of the checks relating to cross-compliance in accordance with Chapter III of Title III.’

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply to aid applications relating to years or premium periods starting from 1 January 2008.

However, points (1)(b) and (5)(b) of Article 1 shall apply to aid applications relating to years or premiums starting from 1 January 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 August 2007.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 552/2007 (OJ L 131, 23.5.2007, p. 10).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 141, 30.4.2004, p. 18. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 381/2007 (OJ L 95, 5.4.2007, p. 8).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 345, 20.11.2004, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 381/2007 (OJ L 95, 5.4.2007, p. 8).

3

(4)  
  OJ L 75, 15.3.2007, p. 8.

4

(5)  
  OJ L 384, 29.12.2006, p. 13.

5

(6)  
  OJ L 5, 9.1.2004, p. 8. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1791/2006 (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p. 1).

6

---