alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
September 30, 1998 Financial  Statements  included in IES Utilities  Inc.'s Form
10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000052485
<NAME>                        IES UTILITIES INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS               
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      1,355,555
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    94,313
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         163,298
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       13,754
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 138,058
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,764,978
<COMMON>                                       33,427
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      279,042
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            258,947
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 571,416
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    18,320
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           601,909
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  50,140
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    15,668
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               13,197
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 494,328
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  1,764,978
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      605,201
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           38,861    <F1>
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     479,216
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     479,216   <F1>
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        125,985
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (2,713)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 123,272
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       39,154
<NET-INCOME>                                   45,257
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    686
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  44,571
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       14,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      46,658
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         168,875
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0          <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0          <F2>
<FN>
<F1> Income  tax  expense  is  not  included  in  Operating  Expense  in the
     Statement of Income.

<F2> Earnings per share of common stock is not reflected  because all common
    shares are held by Interstate Energy Corporation.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5681 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5681

    To improve certain administrative operations of the Library of 
                   Congress, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 2010

  Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To improve certain administrative operations of the Library of 
                   Congress, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITTING USE OF PROCEEDS FROM DISPOSITION OF SURPLUS OR 
              OBSOLETE PERSONAL PROPERTY.

    (a) Disposition of Property.--Within the limits of available 
appropriations, the Librarian of Congress may dispose of surplus or 
obsolete personal property of the Library of Congress by interagency 
transfer, donation, sale, trade-in, or other appropriate method.
    (b) Use of Proceeds.--Any amounts received by the Librarian of 
Congress from the disposition of property under subsection (a) shall be 
credited to the funds available for the operations of the Library of 
Congress, and shall be available to acquire the same or similar 
property during the fiscal year in which the amounts are received and 
the following fiscal year.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect to 
fiscal year 2011 and each succeeding fiscal year.

SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR STUDENT LOAN REPAYMENT PROGRAM FOR 
              EMPLOYEES.

    (a) Availability of Funds Without Regard to Source of Employee 
Salary.--Amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to the 
Librarian of Congress for a fiscal year for salaries and expenses of 
employees of the Library of Congress may be used by the Librarian to 
make payments under the student loan repayment program under section 
5379 of title 5, United States Code, on behalf of an employee of the 
Library without regard to the source of the funds used to pay the 
employee's salary.
    (b) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect to 
fiscal year 2011 and each succeeding fiscal year.

SEC. 3. USE OF UNOBLIGATED APPROPRIATIONS TO MAKE CONTRIBUTIONS TO 
              WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND.

    (a) Use of Funds.--Unobligated balances of expired appropriations 
made to the Library of Congress for fiscal years beginning with fiscal 
year 2011 shall be available to the Librarian of Congress to make the 
deposit to the credit of the Employees' Compensation Fund required by 
subsection 8147(b) of title 5, United States Code.
    (b) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect to 
fiscal year 2011 and each succeeding fiscal year.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2007253EN.01004301.xml

| 28.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 253/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 253/43

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 27 September 2007

amending Decision 2006/800/EC to prolong the application of the plans for the eradication of classical swine fever in feral pigs and the emergency vaccination of those pigs against that disease in Bulgaria

(notified under document number C(2007) 4457)

(Only the Bulgarian text is authentic)

(2007/624/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 2001/89/EC of 23 October 2001 on Community measures for the control of classical swine fever (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 16(1) and the fourth subparagraph of Article 20(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision 2006/800/EC of 23 November 2006 approving the plans for the eradication of classical swine fever in feral pigs and the emergency vaccination of those pigs against that disease in Bulgaria (2) was adopted as one of a number of measures to combat classical swine fever. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision 2006/800/EC of 23 November 2006 approving the plans for the eradication of classical swine fever in feral pigs and the emergency vaccination of those pigs against that disease in Bulgaria (2) was adopted as one of a number of measures to combat classical swine fever.

| (2) | The Bulgarian authorities have informed the Commission about the evolution of the disease in Bulgaria. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Bulgarian authorities have informed the Commission about the evolution of the disease in Bulgaria.

| (3) | Given the epidemiological situation in Bulgaria it is appropriate to prolong the application of the approved eradication and emergency vaccination plans. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Given the epidemiological situation in Bulgaria it is appropriate to prolong the application of the approved eradication and emergency vaccination plans.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 4 of Decision 2006/800/EC is replaced by the following:

‘Article 4

Applicability

This Decision shall apply until 31 December 2007.’

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Bulgaria.

Done at Brussels, 27 September 2007.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 316, 1.12.2001, p. 5. Directive as last amended by Directive 2006/104/EC (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p. 352).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 325, 24.11.2006, p. 35.

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As
Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Unified Grocers, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended
October 3, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alfred A. Plamann, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C
Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:    December 17, 2009



/s/    ALFRED A.
PLAMANN Alfred A. PlamannPresident and Chief Executive Officer (Principal executive officer)




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5633 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5633

 To improve choices for consumers for vehicles, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 2010

 Ms. Herseth Sandlin introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To improve choices for consumers for vehicles, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Consumer Vehicle Choice Act of 
2010''.

SEC. 2. ENSURING THE AVAILABILITY OF DUAL FUELED AUTOMOBILES AND LIGHT 
              DUTY TRUCKS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 329 of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 32902 the following:
``Sec. 32902A. Requirement to manufacture dual fueled automobiles and 
              light duty trucks
    ``(a) In General.--For each model year listed in the following 
table, each manufacturer shall ensure that the percentage of 
automobiles and light duty trucks manufactured by the manufacturer for 
sale in the United States that are dual fueled automobiles and light 
duty trucks is not less than the percentage set forth for that model 
year in the following table:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                        ``Model Year                          Percentage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Model years 2011 and 2012..................................   50 percent
Model year 2013 and each subsequent model year.............  90 percent.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ``(b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to automobiles or 
light duty trucks that operate only on electricity.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 329 of 
title 49, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to section 32902 the following:

``32902A. Requirement to manufacture dual fueled automobiles and light 
                            duty trucks.''.
    (c) Rulemaking.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall prescribe 
regulations to carry out the amendments made by this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1



                                  AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


        This Amendment is made as of October 15, 1998, by and between Mercury
Air Group, Inc., a New York corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Employer"),
and Mr. Joseph A. Czyzyk (hereinafter referred to as "Employee").

        WHEREAS, Employer and Employee entered into that certain Employment
Agreement dated November 15, 1994 (the "Employment Agreement"); and

        WHEREAS, Employer and Employee agree to amend the Employment Agreement
to reflect the wishes of the Compensation Committee of Employer with regard to
Employee's bonus plan calculation and to enable the Employment Agreement to
continue in full force and effect.

        NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree to amend the Employment
Agreement as follows:

For purposes of all future bonus calculations pursuant to Paragraph Third,
subparagraph (b) Fiscal 1998 EBIT shall be deemed to be $15,156,000 (effectively
excluding the $7,050,000 loss attributable to Western Pacific Airlines) in
determining the three year trailing average of EBIT.

        All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement remain
unchanged and in full force and effect.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the
day and year first above written.




                                        MERCURY AIR GROUP, INC.



                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Seymour Kahn, Chairman of the Board



                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Joseph A. Czyzyk, Individually
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
ELBERT HICKS, Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

______________________

2014

- 3017

______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. PH3443120485 -I- 1.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

P ER C URIAM

.

O R D E R

Elbert Hicks moves to amend his petition for review to include review of a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board different than the one identified in the above caption

. It does not appear that there wa s a final Board dec ision or order when Hicks filed the m otion to amend

. Case: 14-3017 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 03/04/2014HICKS v. USPS 2

However, the Board issued a final order on February 4,
2013

. Hicks also submits two motions to stay proceedings in th e petition before this court and a motion to supplement the record

. Concerning his motion to supplement, Rule 16(a) of the Rules Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that the record on appeal is generally limited to the original pleadings, evidence, and other parts of the proceedings before the agency. See also Cruz v. Depar tment of the Navy, 934 F.2d 1240, 1245 n.6 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (refusing to consider evidence that was not before the Board and not part of the record on appeal). Although the Rules of Evidence authorize judicial notice of certain facts outside of the record, the court is not persuaded that such action is warranted here.

Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion to supplement the record is denied.

(2) The motion to amend the petition is denied.

(3) The motions to stay are granted to the extent that Hicks must formally file a petitio n for review in PH

- 3443

- 13

- 0185 -I-1 by April 7 , 2014. That petition would then be consolidated with this petition

. ( 4) Hicks’ brief is due to the court no later than June 6, 2014

. F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s2 6 Case: 14-3017 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 03/04/2014
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.40


                   AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO MERCURY AIR GROUP, INC.
                        1998 DIRECTORS STOCK OPTION PLAN
                  BY SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                                 AUGUST 22, 2000



                                 Amendment No. 1

                             Mercury Air Group, Inc.
                        1998 Directors Stock Option Plan


WHEREAS, the Paragraph 11(a) of the Corporation's 1998 Directors Stock Option
Plan currently specifically exempts Seymour Kahn under the change in control
provision; and



                                        1
<PAGE>   2

WHEREAS, Seymour Kahn has sold his shares of the Corporation's stock to CFK
Partners, a General Partnership under the Uniform Partnership Act of the State
of Illinois; and

WHEREAS, in accordance with section 13(d) and 14(d)(2) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Board deems it necessary of the Corporation to amend
the Corporation's 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan of the
Corporation are hereby amended as follows:

        1. Paragraph 11 (a) of the 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan is hereby
        amended to read in its entirety as follows:

        11 a) any "person"( as such is used in Section 13(d) and 14(d)(2) of the
        Securities and Exchange Act of 1934) other than CFK Partners, a General
        Partnership under the Uniform Partnership Act of the State of Illinois
        is or becomes a beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of stock of
        the Company representing 50 percent or more of the total voting power of
        the Company's then outstanding stock;



                                        2
#### Fenella Burrell, Appellant, *v.*City of New York et al., Respondents.

(Submitted June 10, 1918;

decided June 14, 1918.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ■ ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 222 N. Y. 513.)
# Exhibit 32.1

# Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350

Solely for the purposes of complying
with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Alliant
Energy Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2004
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|/s/ Erroll B. Davis, Jr.                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|Erroll B. Davis, Jr.                                       
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                       
|                                                           
|/s/ Eliot G. Protsch                                       
|Eliot G. Protsch                                           
|Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

November 5, 2004
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-30675

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PATRICIA MAY SANDERS,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-30008

- - - - - - - - - -

March 1, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Sanders contends that the district court erred by

denying the Government's U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 motion for downward

departure in sentencing her. She argues that her delay in

providing financial information to the probation office is not a

proper ground for the ruling. Sanders asserts that the district

court denied due process to her by not giving adequate reasons

for denying the motion. 
No. 95-30675

-2-

This court lacks jurisdiction of an appeal from "the

district court's refusal to grant downward departure [unless

there was] a legal error or misapplication of the guidelines." 

United States v. DiMarco, 46 F.3d 476, 477 (5th Cir. 1995). 

Sanders's contention that the district court denied her due

process by not stating adequate reasons for the ruling is

frivolous. 

Assuming arguendo that the district court should not have

considered Sanders's delay in providing the information, she is

not entitled to relief because the court would have denied the

departure even if it had not considered this factor. See

Williams v. United States, 503 U.S. 193, 203-03 (1992)

APPEAL DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT 21





Subsidiaries

The Significant subsidiaries of Sears, Roebuck and Co., the names under which 
such subsidiaries do business, and the states or countries in which each was 
organized, were as follows as of January 2, 1999.




        Names                       Place of Organization
       -------                      ---------------------

Consolidated Subsidiaries:



Sears Canada Inc.                      Canada

   Sears Acceptance Company Inc.       Canada

Sears Logistics Services, Inc.         Delaware

Sears National Bank                    United States

SRFG, Inc.                             Delaware

Sears Roebuck Acceptance Corp.         Delaware

91 other companies                     Various




The Company owns 20% to 50% of the outstanding voting securities of 35 
companies which are accounted for on an equity method.

The Company has investments in a number of other corporations representing 
substantial percentages (but not more than 20 percent) of their outstanding 
capital stock.  The Company disclaims control of any such companies.