alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>          JUN-30-1997

<CASH>                       5,270,571 
<SECURITIES>                      0    
<RECEIVABLES>                  217,451 
<ALLOWANCES>                      0    
<INVENTORY>                       0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             5,488,022 
<PP&E>                      16,412,765 
<DEPRECIATION>              11,472,819 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>              10,672,794 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          774,905 
<BONDS>                      2,216,944 
<COMMON>                          0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0    
<PREFERRED>                       0    
<OTHER-SE>                   5,631,647 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>10,672,794 
<SALES>                      1,441,799 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             1,550,367 
<CGS>                            0     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  941,504 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               105,421 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             136,325 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                367,117 
<INCOME-TAX>                      0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            214,732 
<DISCONTINUED>                    0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0    
<CHANGES>                         0    
<NET-INCOME>                   214,732 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    10.52 
<EPS-DILUTED>                    10.52 
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2387
DAVID DE SUSTAR-WARE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORDSTROM, INCORPORATED; TALXUCM SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-04-1318-1) Submitted: June 28, 2006 Decided: July 14, 2006 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David de Süstar-Ware, Appellant Pro Se. Ronda Brown Esaw, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee Nordstrom, Inc. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: David de Süstar-Ware appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination action for failure to prosecute under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny all pending motions and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See de Süstar-Ware v. Nordstrom, Inc. , No. CA-04-1318-1 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 4, 2005 & entered Nov. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 42 Benefits Review Board Service

Notice No. 42
Date: June 9, 1980

NOTICE TO INSURANCE CARRIERS AND SELF-INSURED EMPLOYERS UNDE!
LONGSHOREMEN’S AND HARBOR WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ACT

SUBJECT: Penalty Provisions of Section 14(f) of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor W:
Compensation Act

This notice is to inform interested parties of the policy of the Office of Workers’ Compe:
Programs (OWCP) with respect to assessing penalties against self-insured employers/c
as provided by Section 14(f) of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensati
(LHWCA).

Section 14(f) of the LHWCA provides that if compensation payable under the terms of an
is not paid within 10 days after it becomes due, absent the initiation of review proceedin
the issuance of a stay of payments order, then an additional twenty percent of the pz
compensation is also payable.

Payment becomes due when the Order is filed in the Office of the Deputy Commissior
distinction is made between an award evolved by agreement of the parties such as an
settlement of an award resulting from a hearing.

No distinction is made between payment by check or by draft. If the check or draft is h
by the bank on which drawn, the time of payment relates back to the date the check c
is received by the payee. If the check or draft is not promptly honored by the drawee
payment is not considered to have been made until the check or draft is honored.

If the tenth day is a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, compensation is due on the first b
day following that date. This is in accordance with Rule 6(a) of the Federal Rules o
Procedure.

NEIL A. MONTONE
Associate Director, Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation
#### PEASELEY v. COKE CO.

No. 61 PC.

Case below: 5 N.C. App. 713.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 16 October 1969.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the six months
ended June 30, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000054291
<NAME> KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              26
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      284
<ALLOWANCES>                                         6
<INVENTORY>                                        525
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   961
<PP&E>                                           2,007
<DEPRECIATION>                                     918
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              543
<BONDS>                                            963
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               19
<PREFERRED>                                          2
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                          55
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,050
<SALES>                                          1,004
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,004
<CGS>                                              934
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    49
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  55
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (82)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (29)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (53)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (53)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5655 

AN ACT 

To designate the Little River Branch facility of the United 

States Postal Service located at 140 NE 84th Street 

in Miami, Florida, as the ‘‘Jesse J. McCrary, Jr. Post 

Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5655 EH

1 SECTION 1. JESSE J. MCCRARY, JR. POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Little River Branch facility 

3 of the United States Postal Service located at 140 NE 

4 84th Street in Miami, Florida, shall be known and des5 ignated as the ‘‘Jesse J. McCrary, Jr. Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jesse J. McCrary, 

10 Jr. Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 16, 

2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5655 

AN ACT 

To designate the Little River Branch facility of the 

McCrary, Jr. Post Office’’. 84th Street in Miami, Florida, as the ‘‘Jesse J. United States Postal Service located at 140 NE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF JOURNAL EMPLOYEES' STOCK TRUST AS OF AND
     FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRITY
     BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               20,963<F1>
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               20,963<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0<F2>
<FN>
<F1> The only revenue and expense associated with the trust pertains to 
     dividends received and paid out.  All dividends received are in turn
     paid out, accounting for net income of zero($0)
<F2> Earnings per share is not applicable as net income is zero ($0)
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### HAROLD GENE LAWSON, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 8066

August 26, 1975

539 P.2d 116

*Morgan D. Harris,*Public Defender, and *Robert L. Stott,*Chief Deputy Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellant.

*Robert List,*Attorney General; *George A. Holt,*District Attorney, and *Dan M. Seaton,*Chief Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Appellant’s sole contention in this appeal suggests we should reverse a judgment of conviction and sentence because the trial judge refused to give a requested jury instruction which did not accurately state the applicable law.

*520He has cited no relevant authority in support of the contention; and, in fact the law is otherwise. See Harris v. State, 83 Nev. 404, 407, 432 P.2d 929, 931 (1967), where we said: “. . . [Requested instructions must properly state the law. The appellant can claim no right to have requested instructions given when they do not correctly state the law. Without such right a refusal is not error.” See also, State v. Sheeley, 63 Nev. 88, 162 P.2d 96 (1945).

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            2796
<SECURITIES>                                    213625
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     181199
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                397620
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4571535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           760091
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      10663
<COMMON>                                        886840
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4969155
<SALES>                                           1451
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1451
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (1049544)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9813
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1146886)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1146886)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 215 (Tuesday, November 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 67773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22170]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration 10178 and 10179]

Mississippi Disaster Number MS-00005

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 4.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-1604-DR), dated 08/
29/2005.
    Incident: Hurricane Katrina.
    Incident Period: 08/29/2005 through 10/14/2005.
    Effective Date: 10/27/2005.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/11/2006.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/29/2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: Small Business 
Administration, National Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 
Kingsport Road Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 
6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of Mississippi, dated 08/29/2005 is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:
Primary Counties:
    Holmes and Humphreys.
Contiguous Counties:
    Mississippi: Leflore, Sunflower, and Washington.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 05-22170 Filed 11-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<NAME>                        OHIO & SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY COMPANY
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         212
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               212
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       137,972
<OTHER-SE>                                     (137,760)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   212
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (7,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                15,464
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   8,464
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .000
        


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. 1350, the
undersigned officer of Mercury Air Group, Inc. (the
Company) hereby certifies that to the knowledge of
the undersigned:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Companys Quarterly Report on
    Form 10-Q/A for the three month period ended
September 30, 2002
    fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or
    15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|
| | (2) The information contained in the report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                             



| |                                     
| | ------------------------------------
| | /s/ Joseph Czyzyk                   
| |                                     
| | Joseph Czyzyk                       
| | Chief Executive Officer and Director

January 9, 2004

44
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

In the Matter of D.I., Appellant

and

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION,

King of Prussia, PA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 19-0534

Issued: October 30, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Thomas R. Uliase, Esq., for the appellant

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER GRANTING FEE PETITION

Before:

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

Counsel for appellant has filed a fee petition in the amount of $2,595.00.

1

 The Board notes 

that all petitions for approval of fees for representatives’services are considered under the Board’s 

statutory authority found at section 8127 of the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act2(FECA) 

and under its Rules of Procedure found at 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e).3

As required by the Board’s regulations, appellant has been afforded written notice of the 

fee requested and provided an opportunity to comment on the fee petition. 4 Attached to the fee 

petition is a signed acknowledgement by appellant consenting to the fee in the amount of 

$2,595.00.

1 FECA (5 U.S.C. § 8127(b)) and its implementing regulations (20 C.F.R. § 501.9) require the Board to review each 

fee petition on its own merits and with regard to the unique facts and issues of each appeal. 

2

5 U.S.C. § 8127.

3

20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e).

4

Id. 
2

The Board has reviewed the fee petition and finds it is in compliance with the Board’s 

Rules of Procedure.

5

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT that the fee petition is granted in the amount of 

$2,595.00.

Issued: October 30, 2023

Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

5

Id.
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No. 04-10-00073- CV Roge lio SALINAS , Appellant

v . HASSL OCHER ENTE RP RISES , INC. ,

Appellee Fr om the County

Court at L aw No. 10, B exar County , Texas Trial Court No. 35601 Honora ble David J. R odrig uez, J udg e Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: J une 9, 2010 DI SMI SSED Roge lio Salinas’s appellant’s brie f wa s due April 22, 2010. The cler k of t his court notified Salinas’s attorney

of the due date by letter dated Marc h 23, 2010. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of tim e wa s filed. Acc ording ly , on May 5, 2010, the court order ed Salinas to f ile, not later tha n M a y 17 , 2 01 0, his a

pp e lla nt’ s br ie f a

nd a wr itt e n r e sp on se re a so na bly e xpla ini ng his fa ilu re to04

- 10

- 00 07 3- CV

- 2- timely file the brie f. We advised Salinas that if he failed to file a brief and the wr itten response by the date order ed, we would dismiss the appea l f or want of pr osecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)

. Sa lin a s did not fi le a tim e ly re sp on se to tou r Ma y 5 ord e r. I ns te a d, Sa lin a s f ile d a re sp on se on May 21, 2010, stating he did not rece i v e t h e M ay 5 o rder until May

20; and stating that appellant’ s brief w ould be filed “ on or bef ore Ma y 25, 2010.” The brief ha s not been filed. We theref ore order this appeal dismissed for wa nt of prosec ution. PER C URI AM