alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL REPORTS

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Maurice S. Nelson, Jr., certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of EARLE M. JORGENSEN COMPANY (“EMJ”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof EMJ as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             EMJ’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for EMJ and have:

 

(a)               Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)              Evaluated the effectiveness of EMJ’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)               Disclosed in this report any changes in EMJ’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during EMJ’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, EMJ’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                  EMJ’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to EMJ’s auditors and the audit committee of EMJ’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)               All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect EMJ’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)              Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in EMJ’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

Date: February 16, 2004

 

 
| /s/ Maurice S. Nelson, Jr.                                     |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Maurice S. Nelson, Jr.                                         |
| President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer |

 

----
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2007327EN.01003202.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 13.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 327/32 |

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1459/2007 of 10 December 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 1858/2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of steel ropes and cables originating, inter alia, in South Africa

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 326 of 12 December 2007](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2007_326_R_TOC)
)

On page 19, recital 14:

for:

‘Commission Decision 2007/1459/EC ...’,

read:

‘Commission Decision 2007/814/EC ...’;

and footnote 1:

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(1) | See page 18 of this Official Journal.’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(1) | See page 25 of this Official Journal.’ |

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                             529
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,862
<ALLOWANCES>                                       810
<INVENTORY>                                      3,071
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,225
<PP&E>                                          35,878
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,995
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,737
<BONDS>                                         20,011
<COMMON>                                            54
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,491
<SALES>                                         42,214
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,666
<CGS>                                           38,747
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,283
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,521
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   247
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,076
<INCOME-TAX>                                       844
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,232
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,232
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-14937-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 27, 1996 AND THE UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 27,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1996
<CASH>                                          16,673
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  113,288
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,533
<INVENTORY>                                    203,389
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               338,558
<PP&E>                                         187,578
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,911
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 493,911
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          146,012
<BONDS>                                        300,763
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   493,911
<SALES>                                        505,403
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               505,403
<CGS>                                          363,222
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  363,222
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,786
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   797
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,728
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,764
<INCOME-TAX>                                       207
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,557
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,557
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT

I, Ralph Shearing, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report for period ending September 30, 2003 on Form 10-QSB of Strategic Internet Investments Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of
our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

|Date: November 28, 2003 | Ralph Shearing                            
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|                        | Ralph Shearing
      Chief Executive Officer

---
# EUR-Lex - 32007M4818 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32007M4818

**Commission Decision of 17/08/2007 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.4818 - CITIGROUP / NIKKO) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal 217 , 15/09/2007 P. 0002 - 0002 *

Brussels, 17/VIII/2007

SG-Greffe(2007) D/205086

To the notifying party

Dear Madam, Dear Sir,

Subject: Case No. COMP/M.4818– Citigroup/ Nikko

Notification of 18.07.2007 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1]

Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C179, 01.08.2007, p.12

1. On 18 July 2007, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/20041 ("Merger Regulation) by which Citigroup Inc. ("Citigroup", USA) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of Nikko Cordial Corporation ("Nikko", Japan), by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are :

- Citigroup: financial services including banking, lending, insurance and investment services, financial planning and brokerage;

- Nikko: financial services including retail and wholesale securities brokerage, investment banking, asset management and fund administration.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph c, of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission,

[signed by Mr Malric-Smith] Philip LOWE

Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32

--------------------------------------------------
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

The Board of DirectorsCache, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 333-65113, 333-84848, 333-96717 and 333-110553)on Forms S-8 of Cache, Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2005, withrespect to the consolidated balance sheet of Cache, Inc. as of January 1,2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity,and cash flows, for each of the years in the two-year period ended January 1,2005, which report appears in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-Kof Cache, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New YorkMarch 17, 2006

----
Start with JAN: 

Resources for Small Business 

The Job Accommodation Network (JAN) is the leading 

source of free, expert, and confidential guidance on 

workplace accommodations and disability employment 

issues. Working toward practical solutions that benefit 

both employer and employee, JAN helps people with 

disabilities enhance their employability and shows 

employers how to capitalize on the value and talent that 

people with disabilities add to the workplace. 

Just-in-Time Training Modules: These modules can be used 

to train hiring personnel, human resources staff, front-line 

supervisors, and all managers on Using JAN, the Americans 

with Disabilities Act Amendments Act (ADAAA), and the 

Interactive Process. http://AskJAN .org/training/library.htm 

 

Employers' Guide to Reasonable Accommodation Under 

the Americans with Disabilities Act: This Guide is a 

summary of the most frequent issues that employers have 

regarding accommodations and ADA compliance and JAN's 

practical ideas for resolving them. http://AskJAN.org/Erguide/

 

Searchable Online Accommodation Resource (SOAR):

This self-directed system is designed to let users explore 

various accommodation options for people with disabilities in 

work settings. http://AskJAN.org/soar/ 

 

Tax Credit Resources: Learn about the Disabled Access 

Credit and other credits, which are available for small business 

to cover part of the cost of accommodation or for hiring an 

individual with a disability. http://AskJAN.org/media/tax.html

Spanish Resources: For those English and Spanish-speaking 

individuals who would like to help distribute JAN literature to 

the Hispanic community. http://AskJAN.org/espanol/

A service of the U.S. Department of Labor's Office of Disability Employment Policy 

Job Accommodation Network 

(800)526-7234 (V) 

(877)781-9403 (TTY) 

jan@askjan.org 

http://AskJAN.org 

JAN is a free consulting 

service designed to increase 

the employability of people 

with disabilities by: 1) 

providing individualized 

worksite accommodations 

solutions, 2) providing 

technical assistance 

regarding the Americans 

with Disabilities Act (ADA) 

and other disability related 

legislation, and 3) educating 

callers about selfemployment options.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Independent Auditors’ Report and Consent**

 

The Board of Directors 

ZiLOG, Inc.:

 

The audits referred to in our report dated February 10,2004, except as to note 19, which is as of March 1, 2004, included the related consolidated financial statement schedule as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and for the year ended December 31, 2003, the eight months ended December 31, 2002, the fourmonths ended April 30, 2002, and the year ended December 31, 2001. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based onour audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements(No. 333-88416 and No. 333-108372) on Form S-8 of ZiLOG, Inc. of our report dated February 10, 2004, except as to note 19, which is as of March 1, 2004 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of ZiLOG, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficiency), and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2003, the eight months ended December 31, 2002, the four months ended April 30, 2002,and the year ended December 31, 2001, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of ZiLOG, Inc. 

 

Our report dated February 10, 2004, except as to note 19, which is as of March 1, 2004, contains two explanatory paragraphs. The first paragraphstates that effective as of January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The second paragraph states that the Company’s plan of reorganizationunder Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code became effective on May 13, 2002; however, for financial reporting purposes the effective date of the reorganization is considered to be April 30, 2002. As a result of the adoption of“fresh-start” reporting in accordance with Statement of Position 90-7, Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code, the consolidated financial statements as of and for the eight months endedDecember 31, 2002 are presented on a different reporting basis than the periods before the emergence from bankruptcy, and are therefore not comparable. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

Mountain View, California 

March 26, 2004
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OMAR PAEZ VILLA, AKA Lorenzo Paez Villa,

Petitioner,

v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 17

- 72859

Agency No. A206

- 357

- 262

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 1 2 , 2018 **

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Omar Paez Villa , a native and citizen of Mexico , petitions for review of th e
Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his a ppeal from an

immigration judge’ s decision denying his application f or withholding of removal

and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suit able for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 20 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 72859

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’ s factual

findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny

t he petition for review.

Substan tial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that Villa failed to

e stablish he suffered past persecution based on the harm experienced by his family.

See Wakkary v. Holder , 558 F.3d 1049, 1060 (9th Cir. 2009) (petitioner did not
establish harm to family was part of “ a pattern of persecution closely tied to ”

petitioner) (citation omitted); Navas v. INS , 217 F.3d 646, 659 n.18 (9th Cir. 2000)

( “the deat h of one family member does not [automatically] trigger a sweeping

entitlement to asylum eligibility for all members” of an extended family) (citation

and intern al quotation marks omitted)

. Substantial evidence also supports th e
agency’s conclusion that Villa failed to establish it is more likely than not that he

will be persecuted in Mexico. See Santos

- Lemus v. Mukasey , 542 F.3d 738, 743

- 44 (9th Cir. 2008) (fam ily members remaining unharmed undermined applicant's

well

- founded fear of persecution based on family membership), abrogate d on

other grounds by Henriquez

- Rivas v. Holder, 707 F.3d 1081, 1093 (9th Cir. 2013)

(en banc). Thus, Villa’s withholding of remova l claim fails.

Finally, s ubstantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief

because Villa failed to show it is more likely than not that he will be tortured with

the consent or acquiescence of the government of Mexico. See Aden v. Holder
,3 17

- 72859

589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (2009).

We reject Villa’s contention that the BIA failed to adequately considered

evidence and explain its decision. See Najmabadi v. Holder , 5 97 F.3d 983, 990

(9th Cir. 2010) (“What is required is merely that [the BIA] consider the issues

raised, and announce its decision in terms sufficient to enable a reviewing court to

perceive that it has heard and thought and not merely reacted.” ( citation and

internal quotation marks omitted)).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.