alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Jaclyn, Inc.
(the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report"), the
undersigned each hereby certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 14, 2004                    /s/ ROBERT CHESTNOV
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Robert Chestnov, President
                                       (Chief Executive Officer)


Dated: May 14, 2004                    /s/ ANTHONY CHRISTON
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Anthony Christon, Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Jaclyn, Inc. and will be retained by Jaclyn, Inc. and forwarded to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                      -26-
#### Timothy TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mike WILSON, in his individual and personal as well as official capacity as Superintendent of the Mississippi State Penitentiary; Emmitt Sparkman, in his individual personal and official capacities as Deputy Commissioner of the Mississippi Department of Corrections and/or former Superintendent of Mississippi Department of *575Correction, Mississippi State Penitentiary; Ricky Scott, in his individual and personal and official capacities as investigator for the Internal Audit Division and Security Threat Group Intelligence Coordinator for the Mississippi State Penitentiary; Donny Mullins; Ronald Robinson, in his individual personal and former official capacities as former investigator for the Internal Audit Division of the Mississippi State Penitentiary; McNeely, Lieutenant, in his individual personal and professional official capacities as the former officer in charge Lieutenant of the Security Threat Group Housing Unit; Charles Deer, in his individual personal and official capacities as former Case Manager at the Security Threat Group Unit; All Members Of The Security Threat Group Evaluation Team, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-60640.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided April 7, 2005.

Timothy Turner, Parchman, MS, pro se.

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Timothy Turner seeks to proceed in for-ma pauperis (“IFP”) to appeal the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim. Turner alleged that the defendants failed to protect him from an attack by a fellow inmate.

By moving to proceed IFP, Turner is challenging the district court’s certification that his appeal was not taken in good faith. *See Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir.1997); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R.App. P. 24(a)(3). Our review of the record indicates that Turner’s allegations state a failure-to-protect claim under the Eighth Amendment. *See Farmer v. Brennan,*511 U.S. 825, 842, 838, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994). Whether the facts ultimately will prove a failure-to-protect claim is not a question to be answered at this stage of the proceedings. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.1983).

Accordingly, the motion to proceed IFP is GRANTED. The judgment and certification decision are VACATED. The case is REMANDED for further proceedings.

*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or
Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of Permian Basin Royalty Trust (the
Trust) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual
capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FORPERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTDate: April 5, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Ron E. HooperRon E. Hooper,
     Senior Vice President,Royalty Management
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Permian Basin Royalty Trust and will be retained by the Permian Basin Royalty Trust and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   DEC-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                                      APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                                  100,000
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                              0
<PP&E>                                                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                          100,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                         0
<BONDS>                                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                                  9,700
<OTHER-SE>                                                               90,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            100,000
<SALES>                                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                              0
<CGS>                                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         90,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         (90,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     (90,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            (90,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                               (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                             (.001)



</TABLE>
# L_2008303EN.01002601.xml

| 14.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 303/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 303/26

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2007 of 9 October 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 283 of 27 October 2007
  )

On page 6, Annex:

for:

‘ANNEX IX

CALCULATION OF THE PERCENTAGE APPLICABLE TO UNDERTAKINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE THIRD SUBPARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 10(2)’,

read:

‘ANNEX IX

CALCULATION OF THE PERCENTAGE APPLICABLE TO UNDERTAKINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SECOND SUBPARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 10(2)’.

---
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1000/2004

of 18 May 2004         

accepting undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain grain oriented electrical sheets and strips of silicon-electrical steel with a width of more than 500 mm originating in the Russian Federation and making imports of certain grain oriented electrical sheets originating in the Russian Federation subject to registration

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 461/2004 (2) (the ‘basic Regulation’), and in particular Articles 8, 11(3), 21 and 22(c) thereof,

After consulting the Advisory Committee,

Whereas:

A.   PROCEDURE

1.   Measures in force

2.   Investigation

3.   Result of the investigation

4.   Undertakings

B.   REGISTRATION OF IMPORTS

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The undertakings offered by the exporting producers mentioned below, in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of grain oriented cold-rolled sheets and strips of silicon-electrical steel with a width of more than 500 mm originating in Russia are hereby accepted:

Article 2

The customs authorities are hereby directed, pursuant to Article 14(5) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 to take the appropriate steps to register the imports into the Community of grain oriented cold-rolled sheets and strips of silicon-electrical steel with a width of more than 500 mm originating in Russia and falling within CN code 7225 11 00 (sheets of a width of 600 mm or more) and ex 7226 11 00 (sheets of a width of more than 500 mm but less than 600 mm) produced and sold by the companies listed in Article 1 for which an exemption to the anti-dumping duties imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 990/2004 is sought.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall remain in force for a period of six months.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 May 2004.

For the Commission

Pascal LAMY            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 77, 13.3.2004, p. 12.

(3)OJ L 122, 19.5.2004, p. 5.

(4)OJ L 25, 30.1.2003, p. 7.

(5)OJ C 70, 20.3.2004, p. 15.

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 215 (Tuesday, November 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 67742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22408]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Sunshine Act; Agenda

Time and Date: 9:30 a.m, Tuesday, November 15, 2005.

Place: NTSB Board Room, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20594.

Status: The one item is open to the public.

Matter to be Considered: 
5299S Most Wanted Safety Recommendations Program--November 2005 Update 
on Federal Issues.

News Media Contact: Telephone: (202) 314-6100.
    Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Mr. 
Bill McGruder at (202) 314-6222 by Friday, November 11, 2005.
    The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by 
accessing a link under ``News & Events'' on the NTSB Home page at 
http://www.ntsb.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

    Dated: November 4, 2005.
Vicky D'Onofrio,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-22408 Filed 11-4-05; 3:45 pm]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
#### STATE v. JOHN BYNUM STINSON.

(Filed 16 June, 1966.)

1. Criminal Haw § 86—

A motion for a continuance is directed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and no abuse of discretion is disclosed by the fact that the motion was made upon defendant’s contention that two of his relatives were then under charge for criminal offenses and that the publicity incident thereto would prevent a fair trial.

2. Burglary § 4; Larceny § 7—

In this prosecution for breaking and larceny, the evidence is held sufficient to be submitted to the jury, and therefore the denial of defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was not error.

Moore, J., not sitting.

ON *certiorari*to review judgment entered by *Braswell, J.,*June, 1965 Session, Alamance Superior Court.

This criminal prosecution originated by Superior Court indictment charging (1) the felonious breaking and entering a building occupied by C. W. Morris; and (2) the larceny of his property as follows: cigarettes; Two Dollars in pennies; 4 boxes 12-guage shotgun shells; 4 boxes 16-guage shotgun shells; 2 boxes 20-guage shotgun shells; and 50 ball point pens of the value of $75.00.

The defendant, through counsel of his own selection, announced his readiness for trial and entered a plea of not guilty. After the selection of the jury, the defendant “moved for a continuance . . . on the grounds his uncle . . . was in jail charged with murder, and a brother . . . was charged with larceny of an automobile and assault, and that the publicity given to the crimes committed by these two relatives would prevent ... a fair trial.” The court overruled the motion.

The State introduced evidence of the breaking, the description of the articles missing, the defendant’s admission to the investigating officer before his arrest that he had participated in the breaking and the theft. When this admission was first offered, the court conducted inquiry in the absence of the jury and ascertained the admissions were competent and voluntarily made, and permitted their introduction in evidence. At the conclusion of the State’s testimony and the court’s charge, the jury returned a verdict of guilty of breaking and larceny. The court imposed a judgment of five years in prison. The defendant gave notice of appeal but failed to perfect it within the time allowed. We granted *certiorari.*

*662
      *T. W. Bruton, Attorney General, Harry W. McGalliard, Deputy Attorney General for the State.*

*Lee W. Settle, John D. Xanthos for defendant appellant.*

Per Curiam.

We have carefully examined the defendant’s assignments of error and find them without merit. The motion for continuance was addressed to the discretion of the court. The motion for a directed verdict was properly denied. The court’s charge presented fairly the burden the law required the State to carry before the jury could render a verdict of guilty on either of the charges. Error in the trial or reason why the verdict and judgment should be disturbed are not disclosed.

No error.

Moore, J., not sitting.
#### THOMAS MARGIASSO ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. HOME BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Submitted January term, 1932

Decided April 9, 1932.

Before Justices Campbell, Lloyd and Bodine.

For the appellees, no appearance.

For the appellant, *Louis A. Crowley.*

Pee Oueiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Clifton District Court in an action to recover damages for the breach of a contract for a mortgage loan.

Appellant urges three grounds for reversal.

1. That there was no contract established.

From the state of ease agreed upon it is apparent that there were proofs before the trial judge to support his finding that there was a contract.

2. That appellees suffered no damages, and

3. That there is no legal basis for the judgment.

To these the answer is also that the state of ease shows that there were proofs legally justifying the finding.

The judgment under review is affirmed, with costs.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-2491 

LT Case No. 2016-CF-4191-A 

_____________________________

ANTONIO A. WILLIAMS, 

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

_____________________________

3.850 appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. 

Jeb Branham, Judge. 

Antonio A. William, Carrabelle, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Damaris E. Reynolds, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

December 12, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

EDWARDS, C.J., WALLIS, and MACIVER, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
#### STATE v. YELVERTON

No. 115 PC.

Case below: 18 N.C. App. 337.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 12 July 1973.
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-2 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-2 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-2 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-2 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-2 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-2 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-2 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-2 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-2 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-2 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-2 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-2 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-2 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-2 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-2 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-2 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-2 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-2 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-2 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 10-2 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 20 of 20
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Gregory F. Ehlinger, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Irwin FinancialCorporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
          c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.    /s/ Gregory F. Ehlinger   GREGORY F. EHLINGER Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer   Date: July 30, 2004