alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Exhibit 99.2


FIRST M & F CORPORATION


CERTIFICATION UNDER
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of First M & F Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002 as filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Robert C. Thompson, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | C. | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | D. | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of               operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|DATE:  February 28, 2003 | BY: | /s/ Robert C. Thompson, III

Robert C. Thompson, III
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------ | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|
|
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5655 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5655

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the Little River Branch facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 140 NE 84th Street in Miami, Florida, as the 
                 ``Jesse J. McCrary, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JESSE J. MCCRARY, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The Little River Branch facility of the United 
States Postal Service located at 140 NE 84th Street in Miami, Florida, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Jesse J. McCrary, Jr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jesse J. 
McCrary, Jr. Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 16, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5655

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate the Little River Branch facility of the United States 
Postal Service located at 140 NE 84th Street in Miami, Florida, as the 
                 ``Jesse J. McCrary, Jr. Post Office''.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-4053

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALONZO LEE JOHNSON, a/k/a Lil Zo,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, 

District Judge. (3:07-cr-00061-FDW-6)

Submitted: August 30, 2010 Decided: September 10, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric A. Bach, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy 

Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Alonzo Lee Johnson pled guilty to conspiracy to 

possess with intent to distribute fifty grams or more of cocaine 

base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), 846 

(2006). The district court sentenced Johnson within the 

advisory Guidelines range to 160 months’ imprisonment. 

On appeal, counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), noting no meritorious issues 

for appeal, but questioning the voluntariness of Johnson’s plea 

and whether the sentence imposed was reasonable. Johnson filed 

a pro se supplemental brief raising the same issues and arguing 

that he is entitled to a sentence reduction based on the 

sentencing disparities involving cocaine powder and cocaine 

base. Finding no error, we affirm. 

We have reviewed the record and conclude that the 

district court substantially complied with the requirements of 

Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 and ensured that Johnson’s plea was knowing 

and voluntary. We also conclude that the district court imposed 

a sentence that is procedurally and substantively reasonable. 

See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007) (review of 

sentence is for abuse of discretion). 

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire 

record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for 

appeal. We have considered the claims asserted in Johnson’s pro 
3

se supplemental brief and conclude they are without merit. We 

therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. We also deny 

Johnson’s motion for substitution of counsel and to place this 

appeal in abeyance.

This court requires that counsel inform Johnson, in 

writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the 

United States for further review. If Johnson requests that a 

petition be filed, but counsel believes that such filing would 

be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to 

withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that 

a copy thereof was served on Johnson. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 213 (Friday, November 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67190-67191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22038]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CA-920-1310-FI; CACA 42933]


Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease CACA 42933

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Public Law 97-451, Hamar Associates 
timely filed a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease CACA 
42933 for lands in San Luis Obispo County, California, and it was 
accompanied by all required rentals and royalties accruing from June 1, 
2005, the date of termination.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bonnie J. Edgerly, Land Law Examiner, 
Branch of Adjudication, Division of Energy & Minerals, BLM California 
State Office, 2800 Cottage Way, W-1834, Sacramento, California 95825, 
(916) 978-4370.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: No valid lease has been issued affecting the 
lands. The lessee has agreed to new lease terms for rentals and 
royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction

[[Page 67191]]

thereof and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the 
required $500 administrative fee and has reimbursed the Bureau of Land 
Management for the cost of this Federal Register notice. The Lessee has 
met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in 
sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 
188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate the 
lease effective June 1, 2005, subject to the original terms and 
conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates 
cited above.

    Dated: October 19, 2005.
Debra Marsh,
Supervisor, Branch of Adjudication, Division of Energy & Minerals.
[FR Doc. 05-22038 Filed 11-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
**
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**THETRUSTEE***

**OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, andfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ross C. Durr, Senior Vice President and Mineral Interest Director of PNC Bank, National Association, on behalf of PNC Bank, National Association, theTrustee of the San Juan Basin Royalty Trust (the “Trust”),* not in its individual capacity but solely as Trustee of the Trust, hereby certify that: 

 
 1.
The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (as explained in Note 1 to the Trust’s financial statements contained in the Report, in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 12:E, FinancialStatements of Royalty Trusts, the Trust prepares its financial statements in a manner that differs from generally accepted accounting principles; such presentation is customary to other royalty trusts); and 

 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Trust. 

 

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS

TRUSTEE OF THE

SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
By: 
/s/ Ross C. Durr
Name: Ross C. DurrTitle: 
Senior Vice President and

Mineral InterestDirector

 
*
The Trust has no executive officers. 

 
**
#### Willis Floyd WILEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Chuck BISCOE, Warden; Dorothy Burns; Warner Lumpkins; James Wheeler; Edger Hulipas, Dr.; Faith Strunk, Nurse Practitioner; T.M. Adkins, Capt.; James Mader, Bldg. Capt.; Yonda Rafter, Lt.; Ricky Price, Lt.; Javier Zarate, Lt.; Susan Rivas; Wilson Young, Sgt.; David Fanning; Arturo Ramirez; Deborah Hardman, Officer; Kenneth Tyler, Officer; Lora Miller, Officer; Dora Taylor, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-41138.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided April 20, 2005.

Willis Floyd Wiley, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division Beto Unit, Tennessee Colony, TX, pro se.

Before JONES, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Willis Floyd Wiley, Texas prisoner # 753383, appeals the district court’s denial of his request for a prehminary injunction in his civil rights action. Wiley asks that the defendants, employees of the C.T. Terrell Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice—Institutional Division, be ordered to provide him with access to a handicapped shower facility until completion of his civil action. Because Wiley is no longer incarcerated at the C.T. Terrell Unit, his claim for injunctive relief is moot. *See Cooper v. Sheriff, Lubbock County, Tex.,*929 F.2d 1078, 1084 (5th Cir.1991); *Bailey v. Southerland,*821 F.2d 277, 279 (5th Cir.1987). Consequently, the order of the district court denying Wiley’s request for a preliminary injunction is AFFIRMED.

Wiley also contends that the district court erred in denying relief on his civil rights claims. The district court has not yet addressed the merits of these claims, and we therefore need not consider these arguments.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-81,361-02

EX PARTE KENNETH GERHART ANDREW, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1058171-A IN THE 177TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual

assault and sentenced to thirty-five years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed

his conviction. Andrew v. State, No. 14-07-00241-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, no

pet.). 

Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to timely notify him that his conviction had

been affirmed. The trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate
2

counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed. The trial court

recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). 

We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionary review of the judgment of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in cause number 14-07-

00241-CR that affirmed his conviction in cause number 1058171 from the 177th District Court of

Harris County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30

days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: September 24, 2014

Do not publish
Exhibit
10.51


 


SIXTH
AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This
SIXTH AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”)
is made and entered as of this 17 day of January 2022 (the “Amendment Effective Date”) by and between InspireMD,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Craig Shore (the “Executive”; together
with the Company, the “Parties”) for purposes of amending that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
dated as of May 5, 2014, as amended on January 5, 2015, July 25, 2016, March 25, 2019, August 14, 2020 and November 4, 2021, by and between
the Company and the Executive (the “Agreement”). Terms used in this Amendment with initial capital letters
that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.


 


WHEREAS,
Section 7.5 of the Agreement provides that the parties to the Agreement may amend the Agreement in a writing signed by the parties; and


 


WHEREAS,
the Parties desire to amend the Agreement in certain respects.


 


NOW
THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 7.5 of the Agreement, and for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the Company and the Executive agree as follows:


 


1.
Section 2.2 of the Agreement, paragraph (a), is hereby amended as of the Amended Effective Date by deleting said paragraph in its entirety
and substituting in lieu thereof the following new Section 2.2, paragraph (a):


 


(a)
The Executive shall be paid a base salary of no less than NIS 89,440 effective January 1, 2022, per month (NIS 1,073,280 on an annualized
basis) during the Term; provided, however, that nothing shall prohibit the Company, to the extent permitted by law, from reducing the
base salary as part of an overall cost reduction program that affects all senior executives of the Company Group and does not disproportionately
affect the Executive, so long as such reductions do not reduce the base salary to a rate that is less than 90% of the minimum base salary
amount set forth above (or, if the minimum base salary amount has been increased during the Term, 90% of such increased amount). The
Executive’s base salary shall be reviewed annually by the Chief Executive Officer for increase (but not decrease, except as permitted
above) as part of the Company’s annual compensation review.


 


2.
Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with the provisions
thereof.


 


3.
In the event of a conflict between the Agreement and the Amendment, this Amendment shall govern.


 


[Signature
Page Follows]


 




    	 



     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date.


 


	INSPIREMD, INC.	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 	 	 
	By		 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	[signature]	 	[signature]
	 	 	 	 
	Marvin Slosman	 	Craig
    Shore, an individual
	 	 	 	 
	Its:	Chief
    Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       144,302,703
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   2,666,648
<MORTGAGE>                                  13,127,328
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   65,500
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             171,181,553
<CASH>                                       1,646,743
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             199,900
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      28,467,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             221,200,911
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            167,766,713
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          8,411,741
<POLICY-OTHER>                               1,531,818
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,967,002
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,441,720
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,510,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               221,200,911
<PREMIUMS>                                  25,158,342
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          8,616,874
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           (296,007)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 181,018
<BENEFITS>                                  11,533,853
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    472,923
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        20,294,763
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,358,688
<INCOME-TAX>                                   190,216
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,168,472
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,168,472
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.4
 
 Amendment Borrower Holding Banks Agent Agreement
 W I T N E S S E T H
    Definitions
 Amendment.
 8.19
    Tangible Assets. The aggregate amount of Tangible Assets of all
members of the Consolidated Group that are organized in the UK, the US or Australia
(and any other jurisdiction agreed to in writing by the Agent in its sole discretion)
will be equal to or greater than 70% of the consolidated Tangible Assets of the
Consolidated Group.
 Representations, Warranties and Covenants.




---



##### 



Agreement in Full Force and Effect as Amended.
 Counterparts.
 Governing Law.
  2




---



##### 



FURMANITE LIMITEDBy:
    
    /s/ Howard C. WadsworthName: Howard C. WadsworthTitle: DirectorBy:
    
    /s/ Joseph MillironName: Joseph MillironTitle: DirectorFURMANITE WORLDWIDE, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Howard C. WadsworthName: Howard C. WadsworthTitle: Vice PresidentBANK OF SCOTLAND, in its capacity as Agent and as a BankBy:Name:Title:
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 2 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 3 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 4 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 5 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 6 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 7 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 8 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 9 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 10 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 11 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 12 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 13 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 14 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 15 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 16 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 17 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 18 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 19 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 20 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 21 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 22 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 23 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 24 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 25 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 26 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 27 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 28 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 29 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 30 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 31 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 32 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03314-GBD Document 18-6 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 33 of 33
Case 7:07-cv-03249-CLB Document 1-4 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 1 of 1