68042 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 216 / Wednesday, November 9, 2005 / Notices 

II. 26 NOTICES OF COMMENCEMENT FROM: 09/26/05 TO 10/14/05—Continued

Case No. Received Date Commencement 

Notice End Date Chemical 

P–05–0303 10/06/05 09/23/05 (G) Alkanoic acid, 3-hydroxy-2-(hydroxyalkyl)-2-alkyl-, ion(1-), salts with 

bisphenol a-bisphenol a-epichlorohydrin polymer 2-alkyl-1-alkanol-1-[(2-

hydroxyalkyl)thio]-2-alkanol-tdi reaction products

P–05–0359 10/06/05 09/23/05 (G) Isocyanate acid, polyalkylenepolyphenyylene ester, 2-(2-alkoxy)alkanol-and 

alkylene glycol-blocked

P–05–0365 10/12/05 09/26/05 (G) Substituted aliphatic amine

P–05–0411 10/06/05 09/23/05 (G) Phenol, 4,4′-(1-alkylalkylidene)bis-, reaction products with bisphenol aepichlorohydrin polymer alkanoate, dialkylenetriamine, 2-(alkylamino)alkanol, 

1,1′-alkylenebis[4-isocyanatobenzene] and polyalkylene glycol ether with 

bisphenol a (2:1)

P–05–0438 10/05/05 09/09/05 (S) Hexanedioic acid, polymer with 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propanediol, 2-ethyl-2-

(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-propanediol and hexahydro-1,3-isobenzofurandione, 

3,5,5-trimethylhexanoate

P–05–0479 10/06/05 09/23/05 (G) Alkanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, ion(1-), salt with bisphenol a-bisphenolaepichlorohydrin polymer alkanoate-2-(dialkylamino)alkanol-2-alkyl-1-alkanol-tdi 

reaction products

P–05–0507 10/06/05 09/23/05 (G) 2-alkenoic, 2-alky-, polymer with alkyl 2-alkyl-2-alkenoate, alkenylbenzene, 

2-hydroxyalkyl 2-alkyl-2-alkenoate and ..alpha.-(alkyl-1-oxo-2-alkenyl)-

.omega.-(phosphonoxy)poly[oxy(alkyl-1,2-alkanediyl)], tert-alkyl 2-

alkaneperoxoate-initiated

P–05–0519 09/30/05 09/01/05 (G) Aliphatic polyurethane dispersion

P–05–0530 09/26/05 09/19/05 (G) Polyolefin ester

P–05–0531 09/26/05 09/19/05 (G) Polyolefin ester

P–05–0533 09/28/05 09/09/05 (G) Phenol, 2,6-dialkyl-, homopolymer, alkenylarene alkyl ether

P–05–0569 09/29/05 09/07/05 (G) Polyurethane prepolymer

P–05–0574 09/26/05 08/29/05 (G) Polyurethane polymer

P–05–0580 09/27/05 09/21/05 (G) Acrylic acid polymer with vinylated benzenes and substituted propanediol 

trimethacrylate

P–05–0581 09/27/05 09/01/05 (G) 2-propenoic acid, polymer with substituted propanediol triacrylated

P–05–0586 09/30/05 09/18/05 (G) 2-propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-hydroxyethyl ester, homopolymer, ester with 

[3-[(carboxyamino)methyl]-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexyl]carbamic acid mono[2-(2-

butoxyethoxy)ethyl]ester, [3-[(carboxyamino)methyl]-3,5,5-

trimethylcyclohexyl]carbamic acid mono[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl] ester and 

alkyl polyester homopolymer hydrogen(methyl-1,3-phenylene)bis[carbamate]

P–05–0592 09/27/05 09/21/05 (G) Benzyl acrylate polymer with substituted propanediol triacrylate

List of Subjects

Environmental protection, Chemicals, 

Premanufacturer notices.

Dated: November 3, 2005.

Darryl S. Ballard,

Acting Director, Information Management 

Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and 

Toxics.

[FR Doc. 05–22384 Filed 11–8–05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–S

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information 

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the 

Federal Communications Commission, 

Comments Requested 

October 27, 2005.

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995, Public Law 104–13. 

An agency may not conduct or sponsor 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act that does not 

display a valid control number. 

Comments are requested concerning (a) 

whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; and (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology.

DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) comments should be 

submitted on or before January 9, 2006. 

If you anticipate that you will be 

submitting comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contact listed below as soon 

as possible.

ADDRESSES: You may submit your 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) 

comments by e-mail or U.S. postal mail. 

To submit your comments by e-mail 

send them to: PRA@fcc.gov. To submit 

your comments by U.S. mail, mark it to 

the attention of Judith B. Herman, 

Federal Communications Commission, 

445 12th Street, SW., Room 1–C804, 

Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information about the 

information collection(s) send an e-mail 

to PRA@fcc.gov or contact Judith B. 

Herman at 202–418–0214.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control No.: 3060–0835. 

Title: Ship Inspections. 

Form Nos.: FCC Forms 806, 824, 827, 

and 829. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit, not—for-profit institutions. 

Number of Respondents: 1,210. 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 216 / Wednesday, November 9, 2005 / Notices 68043

Estimated Time Per Response: 5 

minutes for completion of certificate; 4 

hours for inspection, and 15 minutes for 

recordkeeping. 

Frequency of Response: Annual and 

every 5 year reporting requirements, and 

third party disclosure requirement, and 

recordkeeping requirement. 

Total Annual Burden: 5,245 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: N/A. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A. 

Needs and Uses: The 

Communications Act requires the 

Commission to inspect the radio 

installation of large cargo ships and 

certain passenger ships at least once a 

year to ensure that the radio installation 

is in compliance with the requirements 

of the Communications Act. 

Additionally, the Communications Act 

requires the inspection of small 

passenger ships at least once every five 

years. The Safety Convention (which the 

United States is signatory) also requires 

an annual inspection. However, the 

Safety Convention permits an 

Administrator to entrust the inspections 

to either surveyors nominated for the 

purpose or to organizations recognized 

by it. Therefore, the United States can 

have other parties conduct the radio 

inspection of vessels for compliance 

with the Safety Convention. The 

Commission allows FCC-licensed 

technicians to conduct these 

inspections. FCC-licensed technicians 

certify that the ship passed an 

inspection and issue a safety certificate. 

These safety certificates (FCC Forms 

806, 824, 827 and 829) indicate that the 

vessel complies with the 

Communications Act and the Safety 

Convention. These technicians are 

required to provide a summary of the 

results of the inspection in the ship’s 

log. In addition, the vessel’s owner, 

operator, or ship’s master must certify in 

the ship’s log that the inspection was 

satisfactory. Inspection certificates 

issued in accordance with the Safety 

Convention must be posted in a 

prominent and accessible place on the 

ship. The purpose of the information is 

to ensure that the inspection was 

successful so that passengers and 

crewmembers of certain United States 

ships have access to distress 

communications in an emergency.

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 05–22050 Filed 11–8–05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information 

Collection(s) Being Submitted for 

Review to the Office of Management 

and Budget 

October 31, 2005.

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995, Public Law 104–13. 

An agency may not conduct or sponsor 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a valid control number. 

Comments are requested concerning (a) 

whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; and (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology.

DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) comments should be 

submitted on or before December 9, 

2005. If you anticipate that you will be 

submitting PRA comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contact listed below as soon 

as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all Paperwork 

Reduction Act (PRA) comments to 

Judith B. Herman, Federal 

Communications Commission, Room 1–

C804, 445 12th Street, SW., DC 20554 or 

via the Internet to JudithB.Herman@fcc.gov. If you would like to 

obtain or view a copy of this 

information collection, you may do so 

by visiting the FCC PRA Web page at: 

http://www.fcc.gov/omd/pra.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information or copies of the 

information collection(s), contact Judith 

B. Herman at 202–418–0214 or via the 

Internet at Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Control No.: 3060–1085. 

Title: Collection of Location 

Information, Provision of Notice and 

Reporting on Interconnected Voice Over 

Internet Protocol (VoIP) E911 

Compliance. 

Form No.: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Individuals or 

households; business or other for-profit; 

not-for-profit institutions and state, 

local or tribal government. 

Number of Respondents: 100 

respondents; 14,238,254 responses. 

Estimated Time Per Response: .09–16 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

and one-time reporting requirements, 

recordkeeping requirement and third 

party disclosure requirement. 

Total Annual Burden: 435,894 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: $43,161. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: Yes. 

Needs and Uses: On June 14, 2005 the 

Commission submitted this information 

collection to the OMB under the 

emergency processing procedures. OMB 

approval was received on June 28, 2005. 

Under the emergency processing 

procedures, the OMB approval is only 

granted for six months, therefore, the 

Commission is now submitting this 

information collection as an extension 

(no change in requirements) in order to 

obtain the full three-year clearance from 

the OMB. 

The information collection 

requirements that are subject to OMB 

approval are the following: 

A. Location Registration. Requires 

providers to interconnected VoIP 

services to obtain location information 

from their customers for use in the 

routing of 911 calls and the provision of 

location information to emergency 

answering points. 

B. Provision of Automatic Location 

Information (ALI). Interconnected VoIP 

service providers will place the location 

information for their customers into, or 

make that information available 

through, specialized databases 

maintained by local exchange carriers 

(and, in at least one case, a state 

government) across the country. 

C. Customer Notification. Requires 

that all providers of interconnected 

VoIP are aware of their interconnected 

VoIP service’s actual E911 capabilities. 

That all providers of interconnected 

VoIP service specifically advises every 

subscriber, both new and existing, 

prominently and in plain language, the 

circumstances under which E911 

service may not be available through the 

interconnected VoIP service or may be 

in some way limited by comparison to 

traditional E911 service.