alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 191 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1388 

[Report No. 116–87] 

To manage supply chain risk through counterintelligence training, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2019 

Mr. PETERS (for himself, Mr. JOHNSON, and Ms. HASSAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2019 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

A BILL 

To manage supply chain risk through counterintelligence 

training, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supply Chain Counter5 intelligence Training Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1388 RS

1 SEC. 2. COUNTERINTELLIGENCE TRAINING PROGRAM TO 

2 MANAGE SUPPLY CHAIN RISK. 

3 Not later than 180 days after the date of the enact4 ment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Manage5 ment and Budget, in coordination with the Director of Na6 tional Intelligence, the Secretary of Homeland Security, 

7 and the Administrator of General Services, shall establish 

8 and implement a counterintelligence training program for 

9 officials with supply chain risk management responsibil10 ities at executive agencies (including programmatic, infor11 mation communications technology, and acquisition offi12 cials). The program shall be designed to prepare such per13 sonnel to identify and mitigate counterintelligence threats 

14 that arise during the acquisition and use throughout the 

15 lifecycle of information and communications technology. 

16 SEC. 3. REPORTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF PROGRAM. 

17 Not later than 180 days after the date of the enact18 ment of this Act, and every 180 days for the next three 

19 years, the Director of the Office of Management and 

20 Budget, in consultation with the Director of National In21 telligence, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the 

22 Administrator of General Services, shall submit to the ap23 propriate congressional committees and leadership a re24 port on implementation of the program required under 

25 section 2. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1388 RS

1 SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS. 

2 In this Act: 

3 (1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMIT4 TEES AND LEADERSHIP; INFORMATION AND COMMU5 NICATIONS TECHNOLOGY.—The terms ‘‘appropriate 

6 congressional committees and leadership’’ and ‘‘in7 formation and communications technology’’ have the 

8 meanings given the terms in section 4713(k) of title 

9 41, United States Code. 

10 (2) EXECUTIVE AGENCY.—The term ‘‘executive 

11 agency’’ has the meaning given the term in section 

12 133 of title 41, United States Code. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 191 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1388 

[Report No. 116–87] 

A BILL 

To manage supply chain risk through 

counterintelligence training, and for other purposes. 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2019 

Reported without amendment 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5571 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5571

 To amend chapter 2 of title I of the United States Code to establish 
                      the style for amending laws.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 2010

  Mr. Owens introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend chapter 2 of title I of the United States Code to establish 
                      the style for amending laws.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Legislative Transparency Act of 
2010''.

SEC. 2. AMENDING LAWS.

    Chapter 2 of title 1 of the United States Code is amended by adding 
at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 115. Amending laws
    ``No Act shall be revised or amended by mere reference to it. Every 
bill or joint resolution which amends an existing section, subsection, 
or other subdivision of any Act shall set forth the section, 
subsection, or other subdivision sufficiently to enable the intent and 
effect of the bill or joint resolution to be clearly understood. The 
matter to be deleted shall be enclosed in brackets and any new matter 
added shall be in italics.''.

SEC. 3. CONFORMING AMENDMENT.

    The table of section at the beginning of chapter 2 of title 1 of 
the United States Code is amended by adding after the item relating to 
section 114 the following new item:

``115. Amending laws.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             991
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      890
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,669
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,006
<PP&E>                                           2,556
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,281
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,015
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,909
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,333
<SALES>                                          1,859
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,864
<CGS>                                            1,215
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,538
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  29
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    326
<INCOME-TAX>                                       127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                199
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       199
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

          - [STB Finance Docket No. 34658] 

# AGENCY:

Surface Transportation Board, DOT. 

      ( print page 68128)    

# ACTION:

Correction of Due Date for Comments on Draft Scope of Study for Environmental Impact Statement and Potential Environmental Effects of the Project. 

# SUMMARY:

On November 1, 2005, the Surface Transportation Board issued a Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), notice of availability of a draft Scope of Study for the EIS, notice of scoping meetings, and request for comments for the subject proceeding that contained an inadvertent error (see 70 FR 65976). The due date for comments was identified as January 13, 2005. The correct date is January 13, 2006. Please revise your copies accordingly. 

Vernon A. Williams, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 05-22321 Filed 11-8-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION

I, Gregory F. Ehlinger, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Irwin Financial Corporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
          c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

_______/s/ Gregory F. Ehlinger   ______________GREGORY F. EHLINGER
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 12, 2003
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

NEIL KURT SALAZAR , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No. 4D 1 8

- 3717

[ October 17, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nine teenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Sherwood Bauer

, Jr

. , Judge; L.T. Case No. 472000CF000368A

.

Neil Kurt Salazar

, Malone , pro se

.
No appearance for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

T

AYLOR , D AMOORGIAN and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Strategic Internet
Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report"). I, Abbas Salih, Chief Executive Officer of the company,
certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: | May
      11, 2009 |  | /s/
      Abbas Salih     
|----- | ------------------ |  | --------------------------
|      |                    |  | Abbas Salih, CEO, Director

---
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Christopher Bennett Wooten, * From the 118th District Court

 of Howard County,

 Trial Court No. 14804.

Vs. No. 11-16-00250-CR * September 22, 2016

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5589 

To amend the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 to 

reauthorize the United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2010 

Ms. WATSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring 

Act of 1998 to reauthorize the United States Advisory 

Commission on Public Diplomacy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF UNITED STATES ADVI4 SORY COMMISSION ON PUBLIC DIPLOMACY. 

5 Section 1334 of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Re6 structuring Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 6553) is amended by 

7 striking ‘‘October 1, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘October 1, 

8 2011’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xtra-Gold
Resources Corp. (theCompany) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), I, JAMES WERTH LONGSHORE, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (a)
        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (b)
        the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:
        May 14, 2009
        /s/
        James Werth Longshore
  By:
        James Werth Longshore
 Principal Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Express
Certificate Company (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), John T. Sweeney, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d)
              of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

    /s/ John T. Sweeney
    ------------------------------
Name:   John T. Sweeney
Title:  Principal and Chief Financial Officer
Date:   May 15, 2003
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00288-CV

Eduardo BENAVIDES,

Appellant

v.

Julia BENNETT,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-16084

Honorable Stephani A. Walsh,1 Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant Eduardo Benavides.

SIGNED June 15, 2016.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

 1 The order that appellant challenges on appeal—“Order Granting Defendant’s No Evidence Motion for Summary 

Judgment” as to the claim for unlawful conversion—was signed by the Honorable Larry Noll, presiding judge of the 

408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, on February 5, 2015.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00178

- CV

Andrew Morris , Appellant

v.

Carrie Cecilia Veilleux , Appellee

FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D

- 1

- FM

- 19

- 000995 , THE HONORABLE JAN SOIFER , JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER C URIAM

A ppel lant ’ s reply brief on appeal was originally due January 5, 202 3. On

counsel’s motion , the time for filing was extended to Febru ary 6, 202 3. Appell ant ’ s counsel has

now filed a second motion, request ing that the Court extend the time for fil i ng app el lant ’ s reply

brief. We grant the motion for extension of time and order appell ant to file a reply brief no later

than March 6, 2023. No further extension of time will be granted and failure to com ply with this

order will result in the Court cons i dering the appeal on only the briefing that has been filed to

date

. See Tex. R. App. P. 38. 3

.

It is ordered on February 1 6 , 202 3.

Before Justices Baker, Kel ly, and S mith
#### Arman GEVORKYAN; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-72229.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*211Submitted March 23, 2005.**

Decided April 11, 2005.

Houman Varzandeh, Esq., Law Offices of Zaman & Varzandeh, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.

Regional Counsel, Western Region, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, David V. Bernal, Attorney, Andrew C. MacLaehlan, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Houman Varzandeh, Esq., Law Offices of Zaman & Varzandeh, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.

Regional Counsel, Western Region, Laguna Niguel, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, David V. Bernal, Attorney, Andrew C. MacLaehlan, Esq., DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Arman Gevorkyan, his wife and two minor children, natives and citizens of Armenia, petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance without opinion of an immigration judge’s (“LJ”) denial of their motion to reopen removal proceedings because of lack of notice. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion, *Arrieta v. INS,*117 F.3d 429, 430 (9th Cir.1997) (per curiam), and we deny the petition for review.

The IJ did not abuse her discretion in denying the Gevorkyans’ motion to reopen because she properly concluded that where the former Immigration *&*Naturalization Service (“INS”) sent notice by certified mail to the petitioners’ address of record, and postal records indicate that delivery was attempted three times before the notice was returned to the INS marked “unclaimed,” the Gevorkyans’ sworn statements that they were not served by the INS failed to rebut the strong presumption of effective service created by proof of attempted delivery and notification of certified mail. *See id.*at 431 (holding that in order to overcome the strong presumption of delivery, an alien must establish that there was nondelivery or improper delivery by the Postal Service) (emphasis added); *see also Matter of M-D-*23 I. *&*N. Dec. 541, 547 (BIA 2002) (noting that an alien may not defeat service by neglecting or refusing to collect his mail).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.