alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007027EN.01001801.xml

| 7.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/18

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4415 — Motorola/Symbol)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 27/04)

On 8 January 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4415. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4415. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5606 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 47 South 7th Street in Indiana, Pennsylvania, 

as the ‘‘James M. ‘Jimmy’ Stewart Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5606 EH

1 SECTION 1. JAMES M. ‘‘JIMMY’’ STEWART POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 47 South 7th Street in Indiana, 

5 Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘James M. ‘Jimmy’ Stewart Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘James M. ‘Jimmy’ 

11 Stewart Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 30 

(legislative day September 29), 2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5606 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostStewart Post Office Building’’. ana, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘James M. ‘Jimmy’ al Service located at 47 South 7th Street in Indi-
<TABLE>
                                     EXHIBIT 11

                                IONICS, INCORPORATED

                          COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                  (Amounts in thousands, except earnings per share)
<CAPTION>
                                            Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended
                                               September 30,          September 30,  
                                              1995       1994        1995       1994 
<S>                                         <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>
Net income                                  $ 5,281    $ 4,172     $14,027    $11,151

Earnings per common and common
  equivalent share:

  Weighted average number of shares                                
    outstanding                              14,089     13,932      14,043     13,912

  Incremental shares for stock options
    under treasury stock method                 609        258         492        242

  Weighted average number of common and  
    common equivalent shares outstanding     14,698     14,190      14,535     14,154

  Earnings per common and common
    equivalent share                        $   .36    $   .29     $   .97    $   .79

Earnings per common and common equivalent 
   share - assuming full dilution:

  Weighted average number of shares                                
    outstanding                              14,089     13,932      14,043     13,912

  Incremental shares for stock options                             
    under treasury stock method                 670        260         575        249

  Weighted average number of common and 
    common equivalent shares outstanding -
      assuming full dilution                 14,759     14,192      14,618     14,161

  Earnings per common and common
    equivalent share - assuming                                               
      full dilution                         $   .36    $   .29     $   .96A   $   .79
<FN>
A Dilution is less than 3% so the primary basis was used for per share calculations.

                                          -11-
/12
</TABLE


</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5570 

To provide that no funds are authorized to be appropriated to the Internal 

Revenue Service to expand its workforce in order to implement, enforce, 

or otherwise carry out either the Patient Protection and Affordable 

Care Act or the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 22, 2010 

Mr. UPTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide that no funds are authorized to be appropriated 

to the Internal Revenue Service to expand its workforce 

in order to implement, enforce, or otherwise carry out 

either the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

or the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act 

of 2010. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NO AUTHORIZED APPROPRIATIONS. 

4 No funds are authorized to be appropriated to the 

5 Internal Revenue Service for the purpose of appointing 

6 any agent or other employee, or procuring by contract the 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5570 IH

1 services of any organization or individual, in order to im2 plement, enforce, or otherwise carry out any provision of, 

3 or amendment made by— 

4 (1) the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 

5 Act (Public Law 111–148); or 

6 (2) the Health Care and Education Reconcili7 ation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–152). 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

BLBA BULLETIN NO. 18-02 

Issue Date: APR O 9 2018 

Expiration Date: Indefinite 

Office of Workers' Compensation Programs 

Division of Coal Mine Workers' Compensation 

Washington, DC 20210 

Subject: Pulmonary Rehabilitation Services for Treatment of Black Lung Disease 

Background: Until now, the Division of Coal Mine Workers' Compensa~ion (DCMWC) has 

required the pre-approval of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) services for treatip.ent of black lung 

disease. This included both approval of each individual treatment facility's PR protocol, as well 

as approval of services for each individual miner. As a consequence of these requirements, very 

few PR providers have applied for approval by DCMWC, and very few miners have received 

this treatment service. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS} adopted new, 

less restrictive procedures in 2010 to cover PR services under the Medicare program. 

Purpose: To streamline our in-facility pulmonary rehabilitation procedures and provide 

appropriate treatment to our miner beneficiaries, DCMWC is now adopting procedures 

consistent with those implemented by Medicare. The updated DCMWC procedures will 

streamline both the provision of PR services by providers and reimbursement for those services. 

This should enhance the ability of medical providers to manage their patients' care. The facility 

and the miner will no longer be required to undergo separate pre-certification processes. 

These updated procedures will also enable providers to use a single code for billing of in-facility 

pulmonary rehabilitation services instead of complex billing code requirements formerly in 

effect, thereby reducing paperwork requirements for both the provider and DCMWC. 

The major changes include: 

• Discontinuation of review and pre-approval of a PR provider's protocol. 

• Discontinuation of the List of Approved PR providers. 

• Certificates of Medical Necessity (CMN) are no longer required for PR. 

• Discontinuation of pre-approval Diary Action Codes. 

References: 20 CFR 725.701, 725.706, 725.707 

Applicability: All DCMWC Personnel. 
Action: 

• When an inquiry regarding in-facility PR services is received, the claims staff will 

contact the inquirer, explain the new procedures and send them a copy of the attached 

letter. 

• Inform miner beneficiaries who inquire about PR to obtain a referral from their physician 

because DCMWC no longer restricts the beneficiaries to a list of pre-approved providers. 

• DCMWC and its bill processing contractor will establish a tracking mechanism to report 

on PR usage and identify individual patients for follow-up in accordance with 20 CFR 

725.707(b). _ 

• Remove and discard BLBA Procedure Manual Chapter 3-603, and PM Exhibits 809,814, 

815,816, and 817. 

Please contact the Chief of Branch of Standards, Regulations and Procedures if you have any 

additional questions. 

Disposition: Retain this Bulletin until further notice. 

MICHAEL A. CHANCE 

Director, Division of 

Coal Mine Workers' Compensation 

Distribution: All DCMWC Staff 

Regional Directors
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
1350, the undersigned officer of Mercury Air Group, Inc. (the
Company) hereby certifies that to the knowledge of the
undersigned:

| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three
and nine month periods ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with
the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (2) The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.                                                                               

| |                                     
| | ------------------------------------
| | /s/ Joseph Czyzyk                   
| |                                     
| | Joseph Czyzyk                       
| | Chief Executive
Officer and Director



January 9, 2004



44
**Exhibit
      32.2**






**Section
      1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer**







The
      undersigned, the Executive Vice President, Finance and Secretary of Jaco
      Electronics, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
      of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the “Quarterly
      Report”) accompanying this certification fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and
      (2) the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company as of the dates and for the periods presented as required by such
      report. The foregoing certification is based upon, among other things, my
      responsibilities as principal financial officer of the Company, my own due
      diligence and representations made by certain other members of the Company’s
      senior management.







Date:  November
      14, 2007





/s/
      Jeffrey D. Gash


Jeffrey
      D. Gash


Executive
      Vice President, Finance and Secretary


(Principal
      Financial Officer)
#### Dean, Appellant, *v.*Trembley.

*51Argued November 15, 1957.

Before Rhodes, P. J., Hirt, Gunther, Wright, Woodside, Ervin, and Watkins, JJ.

*52
      *Paul N.*Barna, for appellant.

*Charles G.*Sweet, for appellee.

January 21, 1958:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The order of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Weiner, as reported in 11 Pa. D. & C. 2d 1.
#### ENTERPRISES, INC. v. HEIM

No. 95 PC.

Case below: 6 N.C. App. 548.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 6 January 1970.
#### FARMER v. REYNOLDS

No. 6 PC.

Case below: 4 N.C. App. 554.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 10 July 1969.
*This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

 

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-30090

Conference Calendar

 

RICHARD A. DARBY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOE STOREY; LYNN BAMBURG,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-625

- - - - - - - - - -

February 10, 1999

Before BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:**

Richard A. Darby, Louisiana inmate #387223, challenges the

dismissal of his civil rights complaint. We have carefully

reviewed Darby’s arguments and the appellate record. Darby had

not exhausted his administrative remedies, through the parish

jail grievance procedures, when he filed his complaint. The

district court did not err in dismissing the complaint for want

of administrative exhaustion. See 42 U.S.C. 1997e(a); Underwood 
No. 

-2-

v. Wilson, 151 F.3d 292, 296 (5th Cir. 1998).

AFFIRMED.
# SS Evaluations
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Jaclyn, Inc.
(the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report"), the
undersigned each hereby certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 15, 2006                    /s/ ROBERT CHESTNOV
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Robert Chestnov, President
                                       (Chief Executive Officer)


Dated: May 15, 2006                    /s/ ANTHONY CHRISTON
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Anthony Christon, Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Jaclyn, Inc. and will be retained by Jaclyn, Inc. and forwarded to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                      -25-
# C_2007231EN.01000201.xml

| 3.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4749 — PSB/OVAKO)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 231/02)

On 6 September 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4749. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4749. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
* District Judge of the Western District of Texas, sitting by

designation.

** Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

May 16, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30727

IN THE MATTER OF: CAJUN ELECTRIC

POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.,

Debtor,

LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,

Appellant,

versus

RALPH R. MABEY, Trustee; RURAL UTILITIES

SVC; SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP

CORP.,

Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

(02-CV-243-B)

--------------------

Before WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges, and FURGESON, *

District Judge.

PER CURIAM: **

Plaintiff-Appel lant Louisiana Public Service Commission

(“LPSC”) appeals the Bankruptcy Court’s denial of LPSC’s claim for

amounts due under the terms of a settlement agreement stemming from2

the bankr uptcy of Debtor Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.

(“Cajun”). The Bankruptcy Court grounded its rejection of LPSC’s

claim on the court’s contractual interpretation to the effect that,

under the terms of a settlement memorandum re ferred to as

“LPSC/RUS/Trustee Term Sheet,” Cajun was not required to continue

the so-called “interest rate escrow payments.”

When distilled to its essence, the LPSC’s argument is that the

pre-existing orders of the LPSC are the law; that every contract

——

including the instant settlement as reflected in the term sheet and

other instruments and correspondence

—— remain subject to the law;

and that the subsisting orders of the LPSC mandate that Cajun

continue to make full payment into the subject escrow account. The

Trustee’s position, oversimplified, is that in Loui siana the

contract is the law between the parties; the parties can contract

around or out of any laws that are not mandatory or do not embody

public policy; and that the parties to the settlement agreement

——

one being the LPSC, which issued the orders in question —— did so

in the instant settlement to the extent it is incompatible with

those orders.

We have reviewed the applicable portions of the record on

appeal, paying particular attention to the term sheet and related

correspondence and documentation, and we have reviewed the

excellent appellate briefs of counsel and listened carefully to

their equally excellent oral arguments. In the end, we are

satisfied that the Bankruptcy Court, as affirme d by the district3

court, committed no reversible errors in its legal rulings, made no

clea rly erroneous findings of fact, and did not abuse its

discretion in the exercise thereof. Consequently, the applicable

rulings and judgment of the Bankruptcy Court are, in all respects,

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.19

Toxford Corporation

c/o Rathbones

Place de Saint
Gervais 1

1211 Geneva

Switzerland

Series A-1 and Series A-2 Redeemable Preferred Stock

Toxford
Corporation herewith consents to an extension of the redemption date of its 907.75 shares of Series A-1 Redeemable Preferred Stock and 1270.85 shares of Series A- 2 Redeemable Preferred Stock, issued by Telos Corporation, to December 31, 2011.
This stock shall remain subject to any and all terms and conditions of the Preferred Stockholders Standby Agreement (integrated hereto by reference), entered into on or about October 11, 2002 with Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc. (formerly Foothill
Capital Corporation), and previously extended on April 14, 2005.



|                         |  |                        |  |                     |  |                                    
|------------------------ |  | ---------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED, |  |                        |  |                    
|                         |  |                       
|Toxford Corporation      |  |                        |  | Telos Corporation  
|By:                      |  |                        |  |                     |  |                                    
|                         |  |                        | 
|/s/ Javier Olero         |  | /s/ Michael Fitzgerald |  |                     |  | /s/ Therese K. Hathaway            
|Signature(s):            |  |                        |  | Therese K. Hathaway
|                         |  |                        |  |                     |  | Vice President, Corporate Secretary
|Javier Olero             |  | Michael Fitzgerald     |  |                     |  |                                    
|Name(s):                 |  |                        |  |                     |  |                                    
|                         |  |                       
|Directors                |  |                        |  |                    
|Title:                   |  |                        |  |                     |  |                                    
|                         |  |                       
|17.3.08                  |  |                        |  | March 13, 2008     
|Date:                    |  |                        |  |                     |  |
EXHIBIT 32.1 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

The undersigned, Wayne P. Garten, President and Chief Executive Officer and John W. Swatek, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Hanover Direct, Inc. (the “Company”),  hereby certifies that to his knowledge the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006 of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period specified. 

 

Signed at the City of Weehawken, in the State of New Jersey, this 7th day of March, 2007. 

 

/s/ Wayne P. Garten

Wayne P. Garten

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

/s/ John W. Swatek

John W. Swatek

Senior Vice President, 

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.