alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER<F1>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-18-2000
<CASH>                                         8,395
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  115,722
<ALLOWANCES>                                   4,763
<INVENTORY>                                    18,923
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               149,225
<PP&E>                                         540,147
<DEPRECIATION>                                 299,758
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 662,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          161,775
<BONDS>                                        4,365
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,600
<OTHER-SE>                                     472,495
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   662,638
<SALES>                                        367,407
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               367,407
<CGS>                                          191,877
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  124,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                50,655
<INCOME-TAX>                                   20,066
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            30,589
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   30,589
<EPS-BASIC>                                    1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.13
<FN>
<F1>   6 ACCOUNTING PERIODS
</FN>


</TABLE>
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Permian Basin Royalty Trust (the“Trust”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in itsindividual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Trust. 

 
  
SIMMONS BANK,

TRUSTEE FORTHE

PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST

Date: March 16, 2020
  
By:

 
 
/s/ Ron E. Hooper
   Ron E. Hooper,   SVP Royalty Trust Management
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the PermianBasin Royalty Trust and will be retained by the Permian Basin Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**
# L_2007325EN.01006801.xml

| 11.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 325/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 325/68

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1453/2007

of 10 December 2007

fixing the standard fee per farm return for the 2008 accounting year of the farm accountancy data network

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation No 79/65/EEC of 15 June 1965 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Economic Community (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 of 13 July 1983 on certain detailed implementing rules concerning the keeping of accounts for the purpose of determining the incomes of agricultural holdings (2), and in particular Article 5(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 5(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 provides that a standard fee shall be paid by the Commission to the Member States for each duly completed farm returns forwarded to it within the period prescribed in Article 3 of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 5(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 provides that a standard fee shall be paid by the Commission to the Member States for each duly completed farm returns forwarded to it within the period prescribed in Article 3 of that Regulation.

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1859/2006 (3) fixed the amount of the standard fee for the 2007 accounting year at EUR 148 per farm return. The trend in costs and its effects on the costs of completing the farm return justify a revision of the fee. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1859/2006 (3) fixed the amount of the standard fee for the 2007 accounting year at EUR 148 per farm return. The trend in costs and its effects on the costs of completing the farm return justify a revision of the fee.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Community Committee for the Farm Accountancy Data Network, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Community Committee for the Farm Accountancy Data Network,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard fee provided for in Article 5(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 shall be fixed at EUR 151.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from the 2008 accounting year.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 December 2007.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ 109, 23.6.1965, p. 1859. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1791/2006 (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 190, 14.7.1983, p. 25. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1192/2005 (OJ L 194, 26.7.2005, p. 3).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 358, 16.12.2006, p. 30.

3

---
# C_2007111EN.01000401.xml

| 17.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/4

---

COUNCIL DECISION

COUNCIL DECISION

of 7 May 2007

appointing Greek members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Social Security for Migrant Workers

(2007/C 111/03)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (1), and in particular Article 82 thereof,

1

Having regard to the lists of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States,

Whereas:

| (1) | in its Decision of 22 March 2007 (2) the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Social Security for Migrant Workers for the period 22 March 2007 to 21 March 2009, except for the Greek members and alternate members; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

in its Decision of 22 March 2007 (2) the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Social Security for Migrant Workers for the period 22 March 2007 to 21 March 2009, except for the Greek members and alternate members;

2

| (2) | the Greek members and alternate members should be appointed to fill the vacant seats, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

the Greek members and alternate members should be appointed to fill the vacant seats,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following are hereby appointed members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Social Security for Migrant Workers for the period up to 21 March 2009:

TRADE UNION REPRESENTATIVES

| Members | Alternates |
| --- | --- |
| Mr Fotis KOLEVENTIS
  Mr Apostolis KOKKINOS | Mr Dimitris TOTSIKIAS |

Members

Alternates

Mr Fotis KOLEVENTIS

Mr Apostolis KOKKINOS

Mr Dimitris TOTSIKIAS

REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS' ORGANISATIONS

| Members | Alternates |
| --- | --- |
| Mr Lambros PAPAÏOANNOU
  Mr Petros GIANNOULOPOULOS | Mr Ioannis PAPAGEORGIOU |

Members

Alternates

Mr Lambros PAPAÏOANNOU

Mr Petros GIANNOULOPOULOS

Mr Ioannis PAPAGEORGIOU

Done at Brussels, 7 May 2007.

For the Council

The President

H. SEEHOFER

---

(1)  OJ L 149, 5.7.1971, p. 2. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1992/2006 of the European Parliament and the Council (OJ L 392, 30.12.2006, p. 1).

1

(2)  Not yet published in the OJ.

2

---
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Banknote Corporation (the
Company ) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven
G. Singer, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                         /s/ Steven G. Singer
                                         Steven G. Singer
                                         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Date: May 17, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Earle M. Jorgensen Company (EMJ) for the period ended June 29, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, William S. Johnson, as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary of EMJ, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of EMJ.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 11, 2005



/s/ William S. Johnson

William S. Johnson

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary



A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EMJ and will be retained by EMJ and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Raymundo ROCHELLE-HERNANDEZ, also known as Raymundo Rochelle-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-51288.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided April 20, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Henry Joseph Bemporad, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Raymundo Rochelle-Hernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      20,466
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               94,978
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,448
<INVENTORY>                                 26,793
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           148,268
<PP&E>                                     316,041
<DEPRECIATION>                             130,776
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             381,928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       64,366
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    15,944
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                 291,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               381,928
<SALES>                                    174,213
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           174,213
<CGS>                                      117,546
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              117,546
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               784
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             463
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             20,954
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,014
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         14,241
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                14,241
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .87
        















</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10.34**

 

**AMENDMENT NO. 1**

**TO THE ZiLOG, INC.**

**2004 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN**

 

Effective as of July 16, 2004, Section 7a. of the ZiLOG, Inc. 2004 

 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety asfollows: 

 

7. Payroll Deductions. 

 

a. Subject to Section 6a hereof, a participant in the Plan may, inaccordance with rules and procedures adopted by the Administrator, authorize a payroll deduction of any whole percentage from 1 percent to 15 percent of such participant’s Compensation each pay period (the permissible range within suchpercentages to be determined by the Administrator from time to time), not to exceed $25,000 per year. A participant may increase or decrease such payroll deduction rate or cease payroll deductions**,**by completing and filing with the Employer anew subscription agreement authorizing a change in payroll deduction rate. Participants shall be limited to one cessation of their payroll deductions per Purchase Period, and one change in their payroll deduction rate (other than cessation of theirpayroll deductions) per Purchase Period, provided that the Administrator may, in its discretion, prior to the commencement of any applicable Offering Period or Purchase Period, increase or decrease the number of such changes allowed to be made by aparticipant during such Offering Period or Purchase Period. A change in rate shall be effective as soon as administratively practicable following the date of filing of the new subscription agreement. In addition, the Administrator may, in itsdiscretion, make any changes or adjustments to the foregoing procedures as it deems necessary or appropriate to comply with applicable law or insider trading compliance programs or policies. All payroll deductions made by a participant shall becredited to such participant’s account under the Plan. No interest shall accrue on payroll deductions.
# L_2007103EN.01004501.xml

| 20.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 103/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 103/45

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 429/2007

of 19 April 2007

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 958/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 19 April 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 19 April 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 19 April 2007, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 shall be 34,165 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 April 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 April 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 247/2007 (OJ L 69, 9.3.2007, p. 3).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 49. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 203/2007 (OJ L 61, 28.2.2007, p. 3).

2

---
#### BOST v. RILEY

No. 74 PC.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 638.

Petition by defendant doctors for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 May 1980.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN IT'S
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,113
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,877
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,566
<INVENTORY>                                      2,380
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,491
<PP&E>                                          50,385
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,423
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,473
<BONDS>                                         45,155
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,510
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    95,423
<SALES>                                        175,862
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,903
<CGS>                                          161,884
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  198,606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,778
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   792
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,611
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,381
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,520
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,861
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,801
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
        

</TABLE>
# C_2007289EN.01000401.xml

| 1.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4899 — SCB/Süd-Chemie)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 289/04)

On 23 November 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4899. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4899. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---