alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
i 1?r Court ofAppaateL'irrict

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

1517 WEST FRONT STREET

TYLER, TEXAS 75702

}

}

CIVIL ACTION FILE NO

C-1228321/C1228525

INEZ MANIGAULT

Plaintiff

vs.

JANE THORN-HENDERSON

and

FARMERS INSURANCE

GROUP

Case No: 12-14-00156-CV

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO PAY SECOND HALF OF

RECORDERS FEES

NOW COMES, Plaintiff, Inez Manigault, moves this Court to extend the time for

paying second half ofRecorder's fee.

The amount offinancial obligation paid between December and January exceeded

the amount planned for.

One half balance is still owedfor Recorder'srecord. The balance can be paidon

February 27, 2015, with no further delays.

This motion is made in good faith and not merely for purpose ofdelay.

I HEREBY CERTIFY,that a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing has been furnished

via U. S. mail to James E. Hughes, Esquire, 3400 W. Marshall, Suite 402, Longview,

Texas, 75604. When contacted, Attorney Hughes stated "he is no longer the attorney of

record for the Defendant." Telephoned,the courts who provided me with the name,

address and telephone of the representing attorney.
Respectfully Submitted this 28th day of January 2015.

Inez Manigault (Pjr

P.^pox 81922

Atlanta, Georgia 30366

(678) 547-3914

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

As required by Texas Rule ofAppellate Procedure 10.1(a)(5), I certifythat I have

made a reasonable attempt to confer, with all other parties, about the merits ofthis motion

with the following results:

Please refer to non-opposition attached from the attorney.

Cc: Attorney Adam Allen

205 West Locust Street

Tyler Texas, 75702

Respectfully Submitted this 28, day ofJanuary 2015.
1/28/2015 Gmail - Manigault v.Henderson; 12thCourtofAppeals

Inez Manigault <inezmanigault@gmail.com>

Manigault v. Henderson; 12th Court of Appeals

1 message

Adam Allen <AAIIen@whiteshaverlaw.com> Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 4:40 PM

To: "inezmanigault@gmail.com" <inezmanigault@gmail.com>

Dear Ms. Manigault, ,

Please all this e-mail to serve as appellee's non-opposition to.yourrequest foran extension of time to pay for the

reporter's record.

Yours very truly,

Adam Allen

White-Shaver, P.C.
#### STATE v. COOPER

No. 28 PC.

Case below: 3 N.C. App. 308.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 12 March 1969.
DOL Top Operational Items

Per guidance from the Federal Transition Coordinator, the Department of Labor (DOL) has identified 

the top operational items a new administration will have to handle immediately after Inauguration.

1. Coronavirus – 19 (COVID) Response 

• Communication to DOL Workforce on any change to DOL Posture.

• Departmental position on necessary Pandemic Supplemental bills, including being 

prepared for short-turnaround Congressional technical assistance requests.

• Job Corps’ centers operating posture or planned changes to that posture.

• Enforcement Agencies’ Pandemic-related approach.

• The Department has been notified of several associated GAO Studies and OIG Audits.

• For additional information, please see the Cross Agency Paper 6. DOL’S External Response to 

the COVID Pandemic, Cross Agency Paper 7. DOL’s Internal Response to the COVID Pandemic 

and the Agency Transition Documents.

2. OMB Passback on President’s FY 2022 Budget

• For additional information, please see the OASAM Transition Document.

3. FY 2022-2026 Departmental Strategic Plan Development

• Decisions will need to be made by Departmental leadership to meet the OMB deadline.

• For additional information, please see the Cross Agency Paper 10. DOL FY 2022-2026 

Strategic Plan.

4. ETA Foreign Labor Certification – H2B

• H2B filing season for employers begins in January. 

• In previous years, as part of the final appropriations bill, the Secretary of Labor and the 

Secretary of DHS have been directed to jointly determine the amount by which the H-2B 

cap should be increased. 

• For additional information, please see the ETA Transition Document.

5. Appointment of Office of Congressional Affairs (OCIA) staff

• OCIA has no Senior Career Staff. A Budget Analyst from the Office of the Assistant 

Secretary for Administration and Management (OASAM) has been detailed to act as OCIA’s 

Senior Career Official on an interim basis. 

• For additional information, please see the OCIA Transition Document.

6. Executive Order 13957 on Creating Schedule F In The Excepted Service

• Preliminary review of Agency positions due to OPM on 1/19/20.

• For additional information, please contact OASAM.

7. Spring Regulatory Agenda

• For additional information, please contact OASP.

8. Three Day Advance Congressional Appropriations Committee Notice prior to Grant Award

• For additional information, please see the OCIA Transition Document.

9. Potential Decisions on Space Planning

• For additional information please see the Cross Agency Paper 15. Real Property Initiative.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5613 

To require that vessels used to engage in drilling for oil or gas in ocean 

waters that are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States must 

be documented under chapter 121 of title 46, United States Code. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2010 

Mr. COHEN (for himself, Mr. ARCURI, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. FILNER, Mr. 

KAGEN, Mr. PATRICK J. MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Mr. TONKO, Mr. 

TIERNEY, and Mr. YARMUTH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require that vessels used to engage in drilling for oil 

or gas in ocean waters that are subject to the jurisdiction 

of the United States must be documented under chapter 

121 of title 46, United States Code. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Coastal Wa5 ters and Shorelines Protection Act’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5613 IH

1 SEC. 2. DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENT FOR VESSELS 

2 USED FOR OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS DRILL3 ING. 

4 Subsection (d) of section 12111 of title 46, United 

5 States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘MO7 BILE OFFSHORE DRILLING UNIT’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘OFFSHORE DRILLING’’; 

9 (2) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ‘‘or’’ after 

10 the semicolon; 

11 (3) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking the period 

12 and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

13 (4) by adding at the end of paragraph (1) the 

14 following new subparagraph: 

15 ‘‘(C) drilling for oil or gas in ocean waters 

16 subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, 

17 or support of such drilling.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Strategic Internet Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I,
Abbas Salih, Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: | May 20, 2005 |  | /s/ Abbas Salih      
|----- | ------------ |  | ---------------------
|      |              |  | Abbas Salih, Director

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

NIGEL GRAHAM ERNST,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-30290

D.C. No. 9:05-cr-00053-DWM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 14, 2016** 

Before: BEA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Nigel Graham Ernst appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the aggregate 6-month sentences imposed upon revocation of

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

JUN 21 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Ernst contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because the

district court placed undue emphasis on uncharged conduct to the exclusion of

mitigating factors. The district court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v.

United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The sentence is substantively reasonable in

light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) factors and the totality of the circumstances,

including Ernst’s breach of the court’s trust within two months of being placed on

supervised release. See United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir.

2007); see also United States v. Xinidakis, 598 F.3d 1213, 1217 (9th Cir. 2010) (“A

district court has discretion to impose concurrent or consecutive sentences after

revocation of multiple concurrent terms of supervised release.”).

AFFIRMED.

2 15-30290
#### WILSON v. SMITH

No. 42 PC.

Case below: 18 N.C. App. 414.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 October 1973.
#### ROBERT J. WOOD, Appellant, v. WARDEN, NEVADA STATE PRISON, Respondent.

No. 7283

January 22, 1975

530 P.2d 423

*Horace R. Goff,*State Public Defender, Carson City, for Appellant.

*Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *Larry R. Hicks,*District Attorney, and *Kathleen M. Wall,*Assistant Chief Deputy District Attorney, Washoe County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

The central issue raised in this appeal from an order denying post-conviction relief has previously been considered and rejected in Williams v. State, 85 Nev. 169, 451 P.2d 848 (1969). Cert. denied, 396 U.S. 916 (1969). Other issues are equally without merit. Johnson v. Warden, 89 Nev. 476, 515 P.2d 63 (1973); Howard v. State, 84 Nev. 599, 446 P.2d 163 (1968). Cf. Anglin v. State, 90 Nev. 287, 525 P.2d 34 (1974); Founts v. Warden, 89 Nev. 280, 511 P.2d 111 (1973).

The order of the district court is affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.214

                                   DEMAND NOTE

$1,100,000.00                                                 New York, New York
                                                                 January 9, 2002

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Wilshire Technologies, Inc. a California
corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Borrower"), hereby unconditionally
PROMISES TO PAY to the order to TRILON DOMINION PARTNERS, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company ("Lender"), at 245 Park Avenue, 28th Floor, New York,
NY 10167, or at such other place as the holder of this Demand Note may designate
from time to time in writing, in lawful money of the United States of America
and in immediately available funds, the principal amount of One Million One
Hundred Thousand and 00/100, DOLLARS ($1,100,000.00), together with interest on
the unpaid principal amount of this Demand Note outstanding from time to time
from the date hereof, at a rate per annum equal to the Prime rate of interest
plus 3.0%, or the highest rate permitted by law, whichever shall be less.

        The principal amount of the indebtedness evidenced hereby shall be
payable on demand. Interest thereon shall be paid when principal is paid from
the date hereof until such principal amount is paid in full at such interest
rate as specified above. Following failure to pay on demand, Borrower agrees to
pay interest on any overdue payment of principal at a rate per annum equal to
the stated interest rate plus 5%, or the highest rate permitted by law,
whichever shall be less. All interest calculations shall be computed on the
basis of a 360 day year.

        Demand, presentment, protest and notice of nonpayment and protest are
hereby waived by Borrower.

        Borrower shall have no right to make any off-set against or deduct from
any payment due under this Demand Note.

        Principal and interest may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

        This Demand Note may not be changed orally, but only by an agreement in
writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of such change is
sought.

        All covenants of Borrower in this Demand Note and all rights of the
holder under this Demand Note shall bind Borrower and its successors and
assigns, and all such covenants and rights shall inure to the benefit of the
holder of this Demand Note and its successors and assigns.

        This Demand Note has been delivered and accepted at New York, New York
and shall be interpreted, governed by, and construed in accordance with, the
laws of the State of New York.

                                        Wilshire Technologies, Inc.



                                        By: /s/ KATHLEEN E. TERRY
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name: Kathleen E. Terry
                                           Title:Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1
 

 
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,as adopted pursuant toSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Irwin Financial Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the "Report"), I, William I. Miller, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  May 13, 2003
_____/s/ William I. Miller_____________ 
William I. Miller 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32  SECTION 1350 CERIFICATIONS Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) I, A.L. Giannopoulos, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
MICROS Systems, Inc. (Registrant), certify that to the best of my knowledge,
based upon a review of the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2004 of the Registrant (the Report): (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant. /s/ A.L. GiannopoulosName:
    
    A.L. GiannopoulosDate:
    
    September 13, 2004
 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) I, Gary C. Kaufman, Executive Vice President of Finance and Administration
and the Chief Financial Officer of MICROS Systems, Inc. (Registrant), certify
that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the annual report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 of the Registrant (the
Report): (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant. /s/ Gary C. KaufmanName:
    
    Gary C. KaufmanDate:
    
    September 13, 2004
E2 Solutions Travel Voucher

Itinerary

Voucher Expense Totals

Accounting Information

Remarks

Audit/Approver Information

Traveler Official Duty Station Voucher Id

RENE A ACOSTA Washington, DC 9834015-1(1)

Voucher Status Type of Travel Document Number

Closed Voucher Informational Meeting A009834015

Travel Purpose Voucher Type

To represent the US Department of Labor. Final

Arrive Depart Time Location Car Hotel Mode Notes

2018-12-09 2018-12-09 04:00 PM Washington, DC NONE No CP

2018-12-09 2018-12-10 07:00 PM Sacramento, CA NONE Yes CP Temporary Duty, LDG $135, M&IE $66

2018-12-11 2018-12-11 01:00 AM Washington, DC NONE No NONE

Notes: CP = Commercial Plane

Transport Lodging M&IE Car Rental Local Transport POV Misc Total

815.41 155.51 165.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 274.90 1410.82

Accounting String CBA Amount TCC Amount Traveler Amount Total Amount

15.10 1230.72 165.00 1410.82

15.10 1230.72 165.00 1410.82

Date/Time Author Remark

2018-12-12 03:23 PM Traveler - NORRIS, RONETTA Voucher Remarks - Voucher ID: 9834015-1(1) - I hereby assign to the United States

any right I may have against any parties in connection with reimbursable transportation

charges described below, purchased under cash payment procedures (41CFR 101-

41.203-2). I certify that this voucher is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and

belief, and that payment or credit has not been received by me.

Date/Time Official Action

2018-12-18 05:54 AM DEBUSK, THOMAS N [DEBU6102] Approved [OSEC-IMMEDIATE]

Requested By: Signature: Date:

Authorized By: Signature: Date:

Generated from E2 Solutions on: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 10:23:14 CST Page 1 of 1

(b) (6)
Case 1:07-cv-03310-LLS Document 4 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03310-LLS Document 4 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 538 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 538

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the earned income 
threshold applicable to the refundable portion of the child tax credit 
             and to increase the age limit for such credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2009

Mr. Pascrell (for himself and Mr. Boren) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the earned income 
threshold applicable to the refundable portion of the child tax credit 
             and to increase the age limit for such credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child Tax Credit Growth Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN EARNED INCOME THRESHOLD APPLICABLE TO REFUNDABLE 
              PORTION OF CHILD TAX CREDIT.

    (a) Reduction in Earned Income Threshold.--Subsection (d)(1)(B)(i) 
of section 24 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to portion 
of credit refundable) is amended by striking ``$10,000'' and inserting 
``$5,000''.
    (b) Repeal of Inflation Adjustment.--Subsection (d) of such section 
of such Code is amended by striking paragraph (3).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2008.

SEC. 3. INCREASE IN AGE LIMIT FOR CHILD TAX CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 24(c) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining qualifying child) is amended by striking 
``age 17'' and inserting ``age 19''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2008.
                                 <all>
```
#### BELIN v. ROHM & HAAS

No. 128 PC.

Case below: 45 N.C. App. 554.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 May 1980.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 22.1

                      SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

     As of August 31, 1996, the Company's subsidiaries, all wholly-owned and
incorporated in California (except where noted otherwise) are:

     Grocers Equipment Co.
     Grocers and Merchants Insurance Service, Inc.
  (1)Grocers Capital Company
     Springfield Insurance Company Limited (incorporated in Bermuda)
     Grocers Specialty Company
  (2)Grocers Development Center, Inc.
     Grocers and Merchants Management Company
     Preferred Public Storage Company
     Crown Grocers, Inc.
     Grocers General Merchandise Company
  (3)Springfield Insurance Company
  (4)Banner Marketing, Inc.

---------------
(1) Outstanding capital shares are owned by Grocers Equipment Co. (67.63%)
    and the Registrant (32.37%).
(2) Outstanding capital shares are owned by Grocers Equipment Co.
(3) Outstanding capital shares are owned by Grocers and Merchants Insurance
    Services, Inc.
(4) Outstanding capital shares are owned by Grocers Equipment Co.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-05-00814- CR NO. 03-05-00815- CR NO. 03-05-00816- CR The St at e of Te xa s, App e lla nt

v. Jam es WalterElli s, Appellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 331ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT

NOS. D -1-DC -05-90 4151 , D -1-DC -05-90 4157 & D -1-DC -05-90 4160 , HO NORAB LE WAY NE PATRI CK P RIEST, JUDGE PRESI DING

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Th e State a

pp e a ls the dis tr ic t court ’s or de r qua sh ing tho se po rt ion s of the ind ic tme nts ag ainst J ames Walter Ellis acc using him of conspiringto violate the elec tion code. SeeTex. P en. Cod e Ann. § 1 5. 02 (We st 2 00 3) ; T e x. El e c . Cod e Ann. §§ 25 3. 00 3, .0 94 , .1 04 (We st 2 00 3) . T he se cause s are companions to those bef ore us in Stat

ev . D eLay , Nos. 03-05-00817- CR and 03-05-00818- CR, decided this day , and ra ise the same issue: whe ther the pe nal code ’s conspira cy p ro vision a pp lie d to the e le c tio n c od e at th e tim e of the a lle g e d c ri min a l c on du c t. F or the re a so ns st ate d in DeLay , w e ho ld t

hat it did no t.2 The district cour

t’s order is affirme d.

__________________________________________ Be a Ann Smith, J ustice Be fore J ustices B . A. Smith, P ury ear and Waldrop Affir med Filed: Apr il 19, 2006 Do No t Pu

bli sh