United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

J.K., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, GATEWAY 

NATIONAL RECREATION AREA, 

Brooklyn, NY, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0829

Issued: January 2, 2024

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER REVERSING CASE

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On May 24, 2023 appellant filed a timely appeal from an April 18, 2023 merit decision of 

the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards 

assigned the appeal Docket No. 23-0829.

On March 21, 2007 appellant, then a 53-year-old pipefitter, filed a traumatic injury claim

(Form CA-1) alleging that on March 14, 2007 he injured his lower back when he stepped up into 

the back of a work van while in the performance of duty. The claim form indicated that he was 

covered under the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS). 1 OWCP initially accepted 

appellant’s claim for sprain of back, lumbar region, and later expanded the acceptance of his claim 

to include aggravated left L3-L4 herniated disc. It paid him wage-loss compensation on the 

supplemental rolls, effective May 3, 2007, and on the periodic rolls, effective July 8, 2007.

On June 28, 2021 OWCP issued a preliminary overpayment determination finding that 

appellant was overpaid compensation in the amount of $26,260.59 for the period April 1, 2019 

1 An original copy of the Form CA-1 indicated that appellant was covered by the Civil Service Retirement 

System (CSRS).
2

through June 19, 2021 because the FERS/Social Security Administration (SSA) offset was not 

applied to payments for this period. It determined that appellant was without fault in the creation 

of the overpayment.

In a July 7, 2021 letter, appellant disagreed with the fact of overpayment and stated that he 

was covered by the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS). He also submitted a November 11, 

2002 leave and earnings statement from the employing establishment indicating that he was 

covered by CSRS, as well as leave and earnings statements dated July 26, December 13, 2003, and 

January 24, 2004 indicating that he was covered by CSRS Offset.

In a letter dated August 3, 2021, OWCP notified appellant that it had liquidated and closed 

his overpayment account, finding that the evidence of record indicated he was covered by CSRS, 

not FERS.

On August 16 and September 17, 2021 OWCP requested information from the Office of 

Personnel Management (OPM) regarding appellant’s retirement coverage. OPM responded on 

October 21, 2021, indicating that appellant was covered by CSRS Offset and that he had not 

converted to FERS. 

On June 27, 2022 OWCP forwarded a FERS/SSA dual benefits form to SSA for completion 

to obtain information regarding appellant’s receipt of SSA age-related retirement benefits. It listed 

the computation period as January 1, 2016 through June 17, 2022.

On July 14, 2022 OWCP received the completed FERS/SSA dual benefits form, wherein 

SSA reported appellant’s SSA age-related retirement benefit rates with and without a FERS offset 

beginning April 2019.

On September 29, 2022 OWCP requested clarification from SSA regarding its July 14, 

2022 response. It included an SSA dual benefits form to obtain information regarding appellant’s 

receipt of SSA age-related retirement benefits with and without federal service. It listed the 

computation period as January 1, 2016 through June 17, 2022.

On November 28, 2022 OWCP received the completed SSA dual benefits form, wherein 

SSA reported appellant’s SSA age-related retirement benefit rates with and without federal service 

beginning April 2019.

In a FERS offset overpayment calculation worksheet dated January 11, 2023, OWCP used 

the information provided by SSA to calculate the 28-day FERS offset for the relevant periods and 

calculated a total overpayment in the amount of $45,523.42.

In a preliminary overpayment determination dated January 23, 2023, OWCP notified 

appellant that he had received an overpayment of compensation in the amount of $45,523.42 for 

the period April 1, 2019 through December 31, 2022 because he concurrently received SSA agerelated retirement benefits and FECA wage-loss compensation benefits for that period without 

appropriate offset. It included the 28-day FERS offset calculations from April 1, 2019 through 

December 31, 2022 for his review. OWCP determined that appellant was without fault in the 

creation of the overpayment. It requested that he submit a completed overpayment recovery 

questionnaire (Form OWCP-20) to determine a reasonable repayment method and advised him
3

that he could request waiver of recovery of the overpayment. OWCP requested financial 

information, including copies of income tax returns, bank account statements, bills, pay slips, and 

any other records to support income and expenses. Additionally, it provided an overpayment 

action request form and further notified him that, within 30 days of the date of the letter, he could 

contest the overpayment and request a final decision based on the written evidence or a 

prerecoupment hearing. 

In a February 16, 2023 letter, appellant contested the fact of overpayment because he was 

never covered by FERS. He asserted that he had been enrolled in CSRS and CSRS Offset since 

1980. Appellant submitted additional leave and earnings statements showing that he was covered 

by CSRS Offset.

By decision dated April 18, 2023, OWCP finalized its preliminary overpayment 

determination, finding that appellant had received an overpayment of compensation in the amount 

of $45,523.41 for the period April 1, 2019 through December 31, 2022 because he concurrently 

received SSA age-related retirement benefits and FECA wage-loss compensation benefits without 

appropriate offset. It further found that he was without fault in the creation of the overpayment, 

but denied waiver of recovery, because he had not submitted any financial evidence to support the 

waiver. OWCP required recovery of the overpayment by deducting $750.00 every 28 days from 

appellant’s continuing compensation payments.

The Board, having duly considered this matter, finds that OWCP failed to properly develop 

the underlying issue of whether appellant’s SSA age-related retirement benefits were attributable 

to federal employment.2

OWCP’s procedures provide that an overpayment occurs when FECA compensation is not 

reduced by an appropriate offset amount. Since SSA will not report an offset amount until after 

SSA benefits are received, an overpayment will almost always occur and will need to be calculated 

for each period in which the offset amount was not withheld from compensation. 3 The offset 

provision of 5 U.S.C. § 8116(d)(2) and applicable regulations apply to SSA age-related retirement 

benefits that are attributable to federal service.4 FECA Bulletin No. 97-09 provides that FECA 

benefits have to be adjusted for the FERS portion of SSA age-related retirement benefits because 

the portion of the SSA benefit earned as a federal employee is part of the FERS retirement package, 

and the concurrent receipt of FECA benefits and federal retirement is a prohibited dual benefit. 5 

In identifying the fact and amount of an overpayment of compensation following a claimant’s 

receipt of SSA age-related retirement benefits, the Board has observed that OWCP uses a FERS 

2

See Order Reversing Case,W.G., Docket No. 20-1389 (issued June30, 2021);Order Reversing Case,R.L., Docket 

No. 20-1333 (issued May 13, 2021); Order Reversing Case, J.L., Docket No. 19-1806 (issued July 29, 2020); A.C., 

Docket No. 19-0174 (issued July 9, 2019).

3 Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 6 - Debt Management, Identifying and Calculating an Overpayment, 

Chapter 6.200.1h (September 2020).

4

See 5 U.S.C. § 8116(a), (d); 20 C.F.R. § 10.421(a).

5 FECA Bulletin No. 97-09 (issued February 3, 1997); see also N.B., Docket No. 18-0795 (issued January 4, 2019).
4

offset calculation worksheet.6 This calculation worksheet is sent to SSA and the completed form 

is returned to OWCP setting forth purported SSA calculations as to the effective date and rate of 

SSA benefits without FERS and the effective date and rate of SSA benefits with FERS. 7 Following 

receipt of the purported SSA calculations, a preliminary determination of overpayment is issued if 

a prohibited dual benefit was received.8

The Board has observed, however, that not all federal employees are enrolled in FERS. 

Some FECA claimants are enrolled in another retirement program, such as CSRS or CSRS Offset. 

Other federal employees are not entitled to be enrolled in a federal retirement program. Therefore, 

OWCP’s procedures with regard to requesting offset information are not applicable to all recipients 

of FECA compensation and SSA age-related retirement benefits.9 Thus, the information solicited 

on the FERS offset calculation worksheet that OWCP sends to SSA is not applicable to non-FERS 

claimants and does not establish either the fact or amount of an overpayment. 10

Here, the evidence of record does not establish that appellant was covered under FERS. 

Rather the evidence establishes that he was covered under CSRS or CSRS Offset during hisfederal 

service. As such, the Board finds that the April 18, 2023 decision must be reversed.11 Accordingly, 

6

Id.

7

Id.

8

J.L., supra note 2.

9

See Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 2 --Claims, Periodic Review of Disability Claims, Chapter 2.812.9c 

(May 2012).

10 See Order Reversing Case, P.C. (R.C.), Docket No. 20-1546 (issued May 4, 2021).

11 See Order Reversing Case, R.L., supra note 2.
5

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the April 18, 2023 decision of the Office of Workers’

Compensation Programs is reversed.

Issued: January 2, 2024

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board