Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 209 / Monday, October 31, 2005 / Notices 62311 

not apply to a die caster that operates 

furnaces which melt only clean charge, 

and that does not operate a sweat 

furnace, thermal chip dryer, or scrap 

dryer. 

Abstract for [M050034] 

Q: Under 40 CFR part 63, subpart 

RRR, may Method 22 visible emission 

readings for each test run at the Mercury 

Marine ring crusher in Fond du Lac, 

Wisconsin, be discontinued after 20 

minutes of continuous operation rather 

than 60 minutes, and not resumed until 

the rest break exceeds 10 minutes? 

A: Yes. Three 20-minute test runs are 

allowed and required under the 

Maximum Achievable Control 

Technology standard subpart RRR. The 

crusher must be shutdown after 20 

minutes of continuous operation 

because the hopper following the 

crusher becomes full, and the crusher 

cannot be restarted without a rest break 

that exceeds 10 minutes. When the 

hopper becomes empty, another 20 

minute test run is allowed. 

Abstract for [0500056] 

Q: Are calciners or dryers used in the 

reclamation of foundry sand subject to 

New Source Performance Standard 

(NSPS) subpart UUU? 

A: Yes. Calciner and dryers used in 

the reclamation of foundry sand are 

subject to NSPS subpart UUU. 

Abstract for [0500057] 

Q1: Are the emissions from the liquid 

sulfur storage tanks at the Burlington 

Resources natural gas sweetening and 

sulfur recovery operation at the Lost 

Cabin Gas Plant in Lysite, Wyoming, 

subject to New Source Performance 

Standard (NSPS) subpart LLL? 

A1: No. Emission from liquid sulfur 

storage tanks at a natural gas sweetening 

and sulfur recovery operation are not 

regulated under NSPS subpart LLL. 

Q2: Does performance testing of the 

tail gas incinerator require the inclusion 

of the liquid sulfur storage tank vent 

gas? 

A2: No. Liquid sulfur storage tank 

vent gas does not need to be included 

in the performance testing of the tail gas 

incinerator, nor in the sulfur reduction 

efficiency calculations. 

Q3: Does monitoring the tail gas 

incinerator require inclusion of the 

sulfur contribution from the liquid 

sulfur storage tanks? 

A3: No. Liquid sulfur storage tank 

vent gas does not need to be included 

in the monitoring of the tail gas 

incinerator, nor in the sulfur reduction 

efficiency calculations. 

Q4: Will EPA approve an alternative 

monitoring method for the combined 

sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from the 

Train 1 tail gas unit and the liquid 

sulfur storage tanks? 

A4: No. EPA will not approve the 

alternative method proposed for the 

combined SO2 emissions from the Train 

1 tail gas unit and the liquid sulfur 

storage tanks. 

Abstract for [0500058] 

Q1: Is New Source Performance 

Standard (NSPS) subpart Y applicable to 

charcoal briquet manufacturing? 

A1: If a charcoal briquet 

manufacturing plant processes more 

than 200 tons of coal per day and meets 

the definition of a ‘‘coal preparation 

plant’’ as defined in 40 CFR 60.250, 

then it would be subject to NSPS 

subpart Y. 

Q2: Does the use of pre-processed coal 

count toward the 200-ton/day threshold 

of NSPS subpart Y? 

A2: No. The use of coal that is preprocessed off-site would not count 

toward the 200-ton/day threshold in 

NSPS subpart Y. 

Q3: Is char made from lignite 

considered to be coal? 

A3: EPA cannot provide a response to 

this question without site-specific 

information. 

Q4: Does NSPS subpart Y apply 

where no size reduction of coal refuse 

removal is conducted? 

A4: The Agency cannot provide a 

response to this question without sitespecific information. 

Abstract for [0500059] 

Q1: ICM, Incorporated, in Colwich, 

Kansas, designs and builds thermal 

oxidizer heat recovery steam generating 

system (TO–HRSG) at ethanol plants. 

Does a thermal oxidizer portion of the 

TO–HRSG satisfy the definition of a 

‘‘duct burner’’ in 40 CFR 60.41b? 

A1: No. The thermal oxidizer does not 

satisfy the definition of a ‘‘duct burner’’

in 40 CFR 60.41b. 

Q2: Are the grains dryers at an 

ethanol plant part of the combined cycle 

system and, therefore, part of the 

affected facility as defined in 40 CFR 

60.40b? 

A2: No. The grains dryers are separate 

sources and are not part of the 

combined cycle system. 

Q3: Can the heat input from the grain 

dryers at an ethanol plant be used to 

calculate the nitrogen oxide 

(NOX)emissions from the affected 

facility? 

A3: No. The heat input from the 

grains dryers cannot be used to calculate 

the NOX emissions from the affected 

facility. 

Abstract for [M050035] 

Q: Does the Maximum Achievable 

Control Technology (MACT) standard 

subpart ZZZZ apply to reciprocating 

internal combustion engines with a siterating of less than 500 brake horsepower 

located at a major source of hazardous 

air pollutants? 

A: No. MACT subpart ZZZZ does not 

apply to reciprocating internal 

combustion engines with a site-rating of 

less than 500 brake horsepower located 

at a major source of hazardous air 

pollutants. 

Dated: October 19, 2005. 

Michael M. Stahl, 

Director, Office of Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 05–21625 Filed 10–28–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–7991–1] 

Notice of the Twelfth Meeting of the 

Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico 

Watershed Nutrient Task Force 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of meeting. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

Twelfth Meeting of the Mississippi 

River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed 

Nutrient Task Force. The purpose of this 

Task Force, consisting of Federal, State, 

and Tribal members, is to lead efforts to 

coordinate and support nutrient 

management and hypoxia-related 

activities in the Mississippi River and 

Gulf of Mexico watersheds. The major 

matters to be discussed at the meeting 

is the activities of the Sub-Basin Teams 

and the Reassessment of the Action Plan 

for Reducing, Mitigating, and 

Controlling Hypoxia in the Northern 

Gulf of Mexico. The Action Plan was 

developed in fulfillment of a 

requirement of section 604(b) of the 

Harmful Algal Blooms and Hypoxia 

Research Control Act (Pub. L. 105–

383—Coast Guard Authorization Act of 

1998) to submit a scientific assessment 

of hypoxia and a plan for reducing, 

mitigating, and controlling hypoxia in 

the Gulf of Mexico. The Action Plan was 

submitted as a Report to Congress on 

January 18, 2001, and the eleventh 

action item is a reassessment of the 

actions every five years. The public will 

be afforded an opportunity to provide 

input to the Task Force during open 

discussion periods. 

DATES: The one day meeting will be 

held from 8:30 a.m.–4:30 p.m., 

62312 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 209 / Monday, October 31, 2005 / Notices 

Thursday, December 1, 2005 in 

Memphis, TN. 

ADDRESSES: Please see the website 

http://yukon.tetratech-ffx.com/ 

12TFMeeting/ for registration, specific 

meeting location, and hotel information. 

The meeting room accommodates 

approximately 125 people, therefore, 

registration is required. There is no 

charge for registration. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Katie Flahive, U.S. EPA, Assessment 

and Watershed Protection Division 

(AWPD), Mail Code 4503T, 1200 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20460; Phone (202) 

566–1206; E-mail: 

flahive.katie@epa.gov. For additional 

information on logistics, registration, 

and accommodations, contact Ansu 

John, Tetra Tech, Inc., 10306 Eaton 

Place, Suite 340, Fairfax, VA 22030; 

Phone: (703) 385–6000; E-mail: 

ansu.john@tetratech-ffx.com. 

Dated: October 25, 2005. 

Diane Regas, 

Director, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and 

Watersheds. 

[FR Doc. 05–21622 Filed 10–28–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–7990–7] 

Proposed CERCLA Administrative 

Agreement; Liberty Industrial Finishing 

Superfund Site 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice; request for public 

comment. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Agency’s May 24, 1995, ‘‘Guidance on 

Agreements with Prospective 

Purchasers of Contaminated Property,’’

notice is hereby given of a proposed 

prospective purchaser agreement (‘‘PPA 

agreement’’) with The Stop & Shop 

Supermarket Company LLC 

(‘‘Respondent’’) concerning 

Respondent’s ground lease of an 

approximately 9-acre parcel of real 

property (the ‘‘Property’’) included 

within the Liberty Industrial Finishing 

Superfund Site in the Village of 

Farmingdale, Town of Oyster Bay, 

Nassau County, New York (the ‘‘Site’’) 

and Respondent’s potential use of the 

Property by construction and operation 

of a shopping center including a 

supermarket and fueling facility. Under 

the PPA agreement, the United States 

would covenant not to sue or take 

administrative action against 

Respondent under section 106 or 107(a) 

of the Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act of 1980, as amended (‘‘CERCLA’’) if 

Respondent becomes an operator of the 

Property. In consideration, Respondent 

would perform work at the Site that 

EPA has valued at approximately 

$100,000 and will also pay to EPA the 

amount of $12,500. By publication of 

this Notice, a thirty (30) day period has 

been established in which the Agency 

will accept written comments relating to 

the PPA agreement. The Agency will 

consider all comments received and 

may modify or withdraw its consent to 

the PPA agreement if comments 

received disclose facts or considerations 

which indicate that the agreement is 

inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. 

The Agency’s response to any comments 

received will be available for public 

inspection at the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region II, Office of 

Regional Counsel, New York/Caribbean 

Superfund Branch, 290 Broadway, 17th 

Floor, New York, NY 10007–1866. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before November 30, 2005. 

ADDRESSES: The proposed PPA 

agreement and additional background 

information relating to the settlement 

are available for public inspection at the 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region II, Office of Regional Counsel, 

New York/Caribbean Superfund Branch, 

290 Broadway, 17th Floor, New York, 

NY 10007–1866. A copy of the proposed 

PPA agreement may be obtained from 

the individual listed below. Comments 

should reference the Liberty Industrial 

Finishing Superfund Site, Nassau 

County, New York and EPA Index No. 

CERCLA–02–2005–2005, and should be 

addressed to the individual listed 

below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael A. Mintzer, Assistant Regional 

Counsel, New York/Caribbean 

Superfund Branch, Office of Regional 

Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, 290 Broadway, 17th Floor, New 

York, NY 10007–1866, Telephone: (212) 

637–3168. 

Dated: October 17, 2005. 

William McCabe, 

Acting Director, Emergency and Remedial 

Response Division, Region II. 

[FR Doc. 05–21624 Filed 10–28–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–7990–8] 

Notice of Proposed Administrative 

Settlement Pursuant to the 

Comprehensive Enviromental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice; request for public 

comment. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

122 (h)(1) of the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act, as 

amended (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 

9622(i), notice is hereby given of a 

proposed administrative settlement 

concerning the RSR Corporation 

Superfund Site, the Murmur 

Corporation, and the Murmur Leasing 

Corporation. 

The settlement requires the settling 

parties to pay $278,273 as payment of 

response costs to the Hazardous 

Substances Superfund. The settlement 

includes a covenant not to sue pursuant 

to sections 106 and 107 of CERCLA, 42, 

U.S.C. 9607. The settling parties also 

agree to assign and implement 

institutional controls. 

For thirty (30) days following the date 

of publication of this notice, the Agency 

will receive written comments relating 

to this notice and will receive written 

comments relating to the settlement. 

The Agency will consider all comments 

received and may modify or withdraw 

its consent to the settlement if 

comments received disclose facts or 

considerations which indicate that the 

settlement is inappropriate, improper, 

or inadequate. The Agency’s response to 

any comments received will be available 

for public inspection at 1445 Ross 

Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before November 30, 2005. 

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement 

and additional background information 

relating to the settlement are available 

for public inspection at 1445 Ross 

Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. A 

copy of the proposed settlement may be 

obtained from Barbara Aldridge, 6SF–

AC, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas, 

75202–2733, or by calling (214) 665–

2712. Comments should reference the 

RSR Corporation Superfund Site, Dallas, 

Texas, and EPA Docket Number 6–03–

05, and should be addressed to Barbara 

Aldridge at the address listed above. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

George Malone, 1445 Ross Avenue,