alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No.33-91296 and Form S-8 No. 333-56125) pertaining to the Bull Run
Corporation 1994 Long Term Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 33-91298) pertaining to the Bull Run Corporation Non-Employee Directors'
1994 Stock Option Plan, and the Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-84833)
pertaining to the issuance of shares of BR Holding, Inc. of our reports dated
August 14, 1999, except as to Note 9 to the financial statements, for which the
date is September 14, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Bull Run Corporation included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) of Bull Run Corporation for the six months ended June 30, 1999,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                            /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina
November 8, 1999
# EUR-Lex - 32007M4558 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32007M4558

**Commission Decision of 22/02/2007 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.4558 - ALPHA PRIVATE EQUITY FUNDS / NON FERROUS INTERNATIONAL GROUP) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

Brussels, 22.02.2007

SG-Greffe(2007) D/200853

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No. COMP/M.4558 – Alpha Private Equity Funds / Non Ferrous International Group

Notification of 19/01/2007 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1]

Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 018, 26.01.2007, page 13.

1. On 19.01.2007, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertaking Alpha Private Equity Funds (Channel Islands) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of Non Ferrous International Group consisting of Non Ferrous International NV/SA (Belgium) and DI Assets S.A. (Luxembourg), by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Alpha Private Equity Funds: private equity investments;

- for Non Ferrous International Group: trade of electric, electronic, ferrous and non-ferrous scrap; and production and sale of non-ferrous metals.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph b, of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

Philip LOWE

Director General

signed by Lowri EVANS

Deputy Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32

--------------------------------------------------
Requesting a Reasonable 

ACCOMMODATION
What is a reasonable 

accommodation? 

It is an adjustment or modification made 

to a job or the workplace or the usual 

manner or circumstances of performing the 

job that allows an applicant or employee 

with a disability to successfully apply for the 

job, perform the duties of the job, or enjoy 

the benefits and privileges of employment. 

Reasonable accommodation also applies to 

the application process.
How do I request 

a reasonable 

accommodation? 

Typically, just ask. There is 

no special process to request an 

accommodation and you do not have 

to use special words. Nor do you 

have to put your request in writing. 

However, some contractors do have a 

specific process, so ask your employer. 
What do I need to tell 

my employer? 

Simply tell your employer that you need 

an adjustment or change at work due to 

a disability. Be prepared to provide your 

employer with enough information 

to show that you have a disability. It 

is important to note that you are not 

required to provide your entire medical 

or mental health history to obtain an 

accommodation. You only need to provide pertinent 

information to request an accommodation.
What happens next? 

After the request is made, the 

employer may ask that you complete 

certain forms, or follow other 

procedures. Any procedures you 

are asked to follow cannot 

be used to prevent a timely 

accommodation from being 

provided or addressed. 
Examples include:

• Providing written 

materials in accessible 

formats (large print, 

Braille, or disc).

• Adjusting or modifying 

work schedules.

• Providing readers 

or sign language 

interpreters.

• Holding recruitment, 

interviews, tests, and 

other parts of the 

application process in 

accessible locations.

• Holding staff meetings 

in accessible locations.

• Providing or modifying 

equipment and devices.

• Adjusting or modifying 

policies and procedures.

• Changing the work 

environment in 

ways that improve 

accessibility.
Your “reasonable accommodation” may 

be different from those provided to other 

employees or job applicants. 

This is because the accommodation depends upon 

the nature of the disability and the type of job. 

The accommodation, no matter what it is, may not 

be unduly costly or disruptive for your employer. 

Your employer can choose the type of reasonable 

accommodation that will be made available; however, 

the accommodation must allow an employee or 

applicant with a disability to be successful.
If you believe you have 

experienced discrimination, 

contact OFCCP:

1-800-397-6251 | TTY 1-877-889-5627 

www.dol.gov/ofccp

September, 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1380 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1380

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to remind prosecutors 
           of their obligations under Supreme Court case law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Due Process Protections Act''.
SEC. 2. REMINDER OF PROSECUTORIAL OBLIGATIONS.
    Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is amended--
        (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and
        (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following:
    ``(f) Reminder of Prosecutorial Obligation.--
        ``(1) In general.--In all criminal proceedings, on the first 
    scheduled court date when both prosecutor and defense counsel are 
    present, the judge shall issue an oral and written order to 
    prosecution and defense counsel that confirms the disclosure 
    obligation of the prosecutor under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 
    (1963) and its progeny, and the possible consequences of violating 
    such order under applicable law.
        ``(2) Formation of order.--Each judicial council in which a 
    district court is located shall promulgate a model order for the 
    purpose of paragraph (1) that the court may use as it determines is 
    appropriate.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JEFFREY TILLMAN,

Appellant

v.

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellees :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 53 MAP 2016

Appeal from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court at No. 596 MD 2015 dated March 31, 2016, exited April
1, 2016.

O RDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: January 19, 2017

AND NOW, this 19 th day of January

, 2017

, the order of the Commonwealth Court

is hereby AFFIRMED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5439 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5439

To require that United States contributions to the fund established by 
   the United States and Brazil to provide technical assistance and 
capacity building be offset by reductions in direct payments for cotton 
                     producers under the Farm Bill.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 27, 2010

 Mr. Flake (for himself and Mr. Frank of Massachusetts) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require that United States contributions to the fund established by 
   the United States and Brazil to provide technical assistance and 
capacity building be offset by reductions in direct payments for cotton 
                     producers under the Farm Bill.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OFFSETTING UNITED STATES CONTRIBUTIONS TO TECHNICAL 
              ASSISTANCE AND CAPACITY BUILDING FUND WITH REDUCTIONS IN 
              COTTON DIRECT PAYMENTS.

    Section 1103 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (7 
U.S.C. 8713) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(6), by striking ``Upland'' and 
        inserting ``Subject to subsection (e), upland''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Effect of WTO Cotton Dispute.--The Secretary shall reduce the 
payment rate for upland cotton under subsection (b) as necessary so 
that reductions in the amount of direct payments made to producers for 
upland cotton offset the full cost of any United States contributions 
to the fund established by the United States and Brazil to provide 
technical assistance and capacity building, as part of the resolution 
of the cotton dispute brought by Brazil against the United States in 
the World Trade Organization.''.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2007322EN.01003201.xml

| 7.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 322/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 322/32

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1443/2007

of 6 December 2007

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 900/2007

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 of 27 July 2007 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2007/2008 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 of 27 July 2007 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2007/2008 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 6 December 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 6 December 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 6 December 2007, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 shall be 37,062 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 7 December 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 December 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 247/2007 (OJ L 69, 9.3.2007, p. 3). Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 will be replaced by Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1) as from 1 October 2008.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 196, 28.7.2007, p. 26. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1298/2007 (OJ L 289, 7.11.2007, p. 3).

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 219 (Tuesday, November 15, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 69321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22601]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability of Non-Exclusive, Exclusive License or Partially 
Exclusive Licensing of U.S. Patent Concerning Low Cost Parachute

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR part 404.6, announcement is made of 
the availability for licensing of U.S. Patent No. US 6,959,897 B2 
entitled ``Low Cost Parachute'' issued November 1, 2005. This patent 
has been assigned to the United States Government as represented by the 
Secretary of the Army.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Rosenkrans at U.S. Army 
Soldier Systems Center, Kansas Street, Natick, MA 01760, Phone; (508) 
233-4928 or e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b0934393e292f750934283e3530293a35281b353a2f323830753a29362275363237"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="33615c515641471d615c40565d5841525d40735d52475a50581d52415e4a1d5e5a5f">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Any licenses granted shall comply with 35 
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR part 404.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-22601 Filed 11-14-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000052617
<NAME> IRWIN FINANCIAL CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          57,851
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          12,143
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     30,198
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          49,628
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            50,070
<LOANS>                                        524,850
<ALLOWANCE>                                      7,067
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,201,113
<DEPOSITS>                                     646,749
<SHORT-TERM>                                   356,864
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             64,374
<LONG-TERM>                                     11,609
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,965
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,033
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,201,113
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,823
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,690
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 6,913
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                21,427
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,538
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,457
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,970
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      856
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 42,269
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,687
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,687
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,196
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     .05<F1>
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,046
<LOANS-PAST>                                       456
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,594
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      495
<RECOVERIES>                                       112
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,067
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             7,067
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,138
<FN>
<F1>information not in 1,000
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Mehmet KILIC, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. MATTSEN FISHERIES INC, in personam; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-35295.

D.C. No. CV-02-00076-TSZ.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 2005.*

Decided April 11, 2005.

Mehmet Kilic, Las Vegas, NV, pro se.

Matthew Turetsky, Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Seattle, WA, for DefendantsAppellees.

Before B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Mehmet Kilic appeals pro se the district court’s judgment entered following a bench trial in his maritime action seeking damages for injuries sustained while serving as a seaman aboard the F/V SHAMAN. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for clear error, *Trinidad Corp. v. SS Keiyoh Maru,*845 F.2d 818, 822 (9th Cir.1988), and we affirm.

Kilic, without identifying any specific contradictions or alleged untruths in the *195trial testimony, contends that several of the witness at his five-day trial were not credible. Kilic also challenges the district court’s award of damages for maintenance and cure, lost wages, and pain and suffering. In light of the record and the district court’s detailed findings of fact, we are not “left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” *See id.*at 822.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
# L_2007253EN.01001401.xml

| 28.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 253/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 253/14

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1114/2007

of 27 September 2007

establishing that no award shall be made in the framework of the standing invitation to tender of white sugar provided for in Regulation (EC) No 38/2007

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 of 17 January 2007 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale for export of sugar held by the intervention agencies of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 of 17 January 2007 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale for export of sugar held by the intervention agencies of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 26 September 2007, it is appropriate to decide that no award shall be made for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 26 September 2007, it is appropriate to decide that no award shall be made for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 26 September 2007, for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 38/2007, no award shall be made.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 September 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 September 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 11, 18.1.2007, p. 4.

2

---
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00255-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.P-L., A CHILD §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 367th District 

Court

of Denton County (18-8366-367)

December 19, 2019

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Bonnie Sudderth_______________

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth