alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          22,631
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,378
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2970
<INVENTORY>                                     37,309
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,195
<PP&E>                                          29,630
<DEPRECIATION>                                   16142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 163,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,084
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,586
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   163,472
<SALES>                                         56,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,729
<CGS>                                           46,113
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,416
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    73
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (949)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (437)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       414
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (851)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (851)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ameriprise Certificate Company (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2018 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Abu M. Arif, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Janet C. Langner, as Principal and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                              
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:May 2, 2018By:/s/ Abu M. ArifAbu M. ArifChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date:May 2, 2018By:/s/ Janet C. LangnerJanet C. LangnerChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
#### FORESTER v. MARLER

No. 100 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 84.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 21 December 1976.
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

N.L., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, MILITARY 

SEALIFT COMMAND, NAVAL STATION 

NORFOLK, Norfolk, VA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0181

Issued: July 18, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On November 18, 2022 appellant filed an appeal from purported July 15 and November 16, 

2022 decisions of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the 

Appellate Boards assigned the appeal Docket No. 23-0181.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’Compensation Act.1 

This jurisdiction encompasses any adverse decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the date 

appellant filed his appeal.2 The case record as transmitted to the Board does not contain a final 

adverse decision of OWCP issued within 180 days from the date of docketing of the current 

appeal.3 As there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP over which the Board may properly 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appealmust be filed within 180 days from the date of 

issuance of a decision of the OWCP.”

3

Id. The Board notes that there are no documents of record issued by OWCP dated either July 15 or 

November 16, 2022.
2

exercise jurisdiction, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 2 3-0181 must be 

dismissed.4 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-0181 is dismissed.

Issued: July 18, 2023

Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

4 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” 20 

C.F.R. § 501.6(d).
Opinion filed A ugust 3 , 201 7



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

______ _ ___ No. 11

- 1 7

- 00 202

- C R

__________ IN RE EDWARD FERNANDEZ MEDRANO

Original Mandamus Proceeding

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Relator, Edward Fernandez Medrano
, has filed a pro se petit ion for writ of
mandamus in this court

. He requests that we require Ross Bush , the district clerk of
Midland County, to perform ministerial duties relat ed to Article 11.07, section 3(c)
of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN . art. 11.07
, § 3(c) (West 201 5 ). Relator asserts that Bush has failed to transmit a copy of certain documents as required

. We dismiss Relator ’ s petition for want of jurisdicti on

. A court of appeals has no general writ power over a person other than a judge of a district or county court unless issuance of the writ is necessary to enforce the

court ’s jurisdiction. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 22.221 ( West 2004 ). A court of appeals has no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless2

necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the court of appeals

. In re Washington , 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1s t Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding). Relator has not shown that a writ of mandamus directed to the district clerk is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Therefore, we do not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against the district clerk.
Addi tionally, Relator references the clerk’s duties to transmit copies of various documents to the Court of Criminal Appeals pursuant to Article 11.07
, section 3(c)

. W e have no jurisdiction to grant the relief requested by Relator with respect to a pending Ar ticle 11.07 writ

. See Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth Dist

. , 392 S.W.3d 115, 117

– 18 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013 ) (indicating that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction when an Article 11.07 application is pending)

. We have no authority to issue writs of mandamus in criminal law matters pertaining to proceedings under Article 11.07. In re McAfee
, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). Should an applicant find it necessary to complain abou t the processing of an
Article 11.07 application for writ of habeas corpus, the applicant may seek mandamus relief from the Court of Criminal Appeals. See Benson v. District Clerk
, 331 S.W.3d 431 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). Relator’s petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

August 3 , 2017 Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J. , and Bailey, J.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of SoftNet technology Corp. (the Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report”), I, James Booth, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:				           (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and				           (2)   The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| By:    | /s/ James Booth                        |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | James Booth                                                                                                                                                    |
|   | Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                        |
|   | November 21, 2007                                                                                                                                              |

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 214 (Monday, November 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 67476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22117]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Interest Rate on Overdue Debts

    Section 30.13 of the Department of Health and Human Services' 
claims collection regulations (45 CFR part 30) provides that the 
Secretary shall charge an annual rate of interest as fixed by the 
Secretary of the Treasury after taking into consideration private 
consumer rates of interest prevailing on the date that HHS becomes 
entitled to recovery. The rate generally cannot be lower than the 
Department of Treasury's current value of funds rate or the applicable 
rate determined from the ``Schedule of Certified Interest Rates with 
Range of Maturities.'' This rate may be revised quarterly by the 
Secretary of the Treasury and shall be published quarterly by the 
Department of Health and Human Services in the Federal Register.
    The Secretary of the Treasury has certified a rate of 12\1/4\% for 
the quarter ended September 30, 2005. This interest rate will remain in 
effect until such time as the Secretary of the Treasury notifies HHS of 
any change.

    Dated: October 31, 2005.
Terry Hurst,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, Finance.
[FR Doc. 05-22117 Filed 11-4-05; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
#### Richard W. Gropp, complainant, *v.*Lester L. Freedman et al., defendants.

[Decided November 17th, 1931.]

*Mr. Palmer M. Way (Mr. S. Rusting Leap,*of counsel), for the complainant.

*Mr. D. Trueman Stackhouse (Mr. Emerson L. Richards,*of counsel), for the defendants.

Ingersoll, Y. C.

A petition is filed to open the decree heretofore entered in this cause. The petition alleges neglect on the part of counsel in not endeavoring to have the hearing reopened and certain testimony presented to the court, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of the petition.

The opening or vacating of a decree rests in the sound discretion of the chancellor. *Mitchell*v. *Mitchell, 96 N. J. Eg. 29.*“In order to open a decree regularly entered, it is necessary that it. appear that the defendant has some good defense, and what that defense is. And to justify a rehearing on the ground of newly discovered evidence, the new matter must, as has been seen, be of such a character that if it had *71been heard it would probably have altered the result. A final decree will not be opened to let in a defense where, from the affidavits submitted, it appears that the evidence to sustain such defense would be insufficient to overcome that on which the decree was founded. *Morris*v. *Hinchman, 32 N. J. Eq. 204; Sandford*v. *Wellborn, 85 N. J. Eq. 577, 587.*A rehearing will not be granted * * * if the evidence t,o be offered is merely cumulative.” *1 Kocher’s Chancery Practice 105,*citing *McDowell*v. *Perrine, 36 N. J. Eq. 632*and other cases.

An examination of the testimony desired to be offered, together with a reading of the testimony heretofore taken compels me to find that the testimony desired to be offered is not a sufficient justification for the opening of the cause and the granting of a rehearing. The petition will therefore be dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 207 (Thursday, October 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 61978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21432]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


National Center for Environmental Health/Agency for Toxic 
Substances and Disease Registry

    The Community and Tribal Subcommittee of the Board of Scientific 
Counselors (BSC), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 
National Center for Environmental Health/Agency for Toxic Substances 
and Disease Registry (NCEH/ATSDR).
    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, NCEH/ATSDR announces the following subcommittee meeting: 
Teleconference.

    Name: Community and Tribal Subcommittee (CTS).
    Time and Date: 8 a.m.-1:30 p.m., November 16, 2005.
    Place: Century Center, 1825 Century Boulevard, Atlanta, Georgia 
30345. See Supplementary Information.
    Status: Open to the public, limited by the available space. The 
meeting room accommodates approximately 40 people.
    Purpose: Under the charge of the Board of Scientific Counselors, 
NCEH/ATSDR, the Community and Tribal Subcommittee will provide the 
BSC, NCEH/ATSDR with a forum for community and tribal first-hand 
perspectives on the interactions and impacts of NCEH/ATSDR's 
national and regional policies, practices and programs.
    Matters to Be Discussed: The meeting agenda will include 
discussions on NCEH/ATSDR health disparities and environmental 
justice programs; the development of an agency environmental justice 
strategy; a review of new NCEH and ATSDR Web sites; discussion of 
new members to the subcommittee.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Supplementary Information: This meeting is scheduled to begin at 
8 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. To participate please dial 1-877-315-
6535 and enter conference code 383520. Public Comment period is 
between 11 a.m.-11:15 a.m. EST.
    Contact Person for More Information: Sandra Malcom, Committee 
Management Specialist, NCEH/ATSDR, 1600 Clifton Road, M/S E-28, 
Atlanta, GA 30303; telephone 404/498-0003; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b4c7d9d5d8d7dbd9f4d7d0d79ad3dbc2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e2918f838e818d8fa2818681cc858d94">[email protected]</span></a>. 
The deadline for notification of attendance is November 14, 2005.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities for both CDC and NCEH/ATSDR.

    Dated: October 21, 2005.
Diane Allen,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 05-21432 Filed 10-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### THAYER v. LEASING CORP.

No. 42 PC.

Case below: 5 N.C. App. 453.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 23 September 1969.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of WMS Industries, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian R. Gamache, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/     Brian R.
Gamache
|Brian R. Gamache        
|Chief Executive Officer 
|August 25, 2010         







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of WMS Industries, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott D. Schweinfurth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/     Scott D.
Schweinfurth
|Scott D. Schweinfurth        
|Chief Financial Officer      
|August 25, 2010
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

M. GARZA ENTERPRISES, IN C . and

EVERETT HOLDINGS, LLC

,

Appellant s

,

v.

JULIA PEREZ

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00110

- CV

Appeal from

131st Judicial District Court

of Bexar County, Texas

(TC# 2022CI00753 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction . We therefore dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction

. We

further order each party to pay its cost s by reason of this appeal . This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 11 TH DAY OF DECE MBER 2023.

L ISA J. SOTO

, Justice

Before Palafox, J., Soto, J. , and Marion, C.J. (Ret.)

Marion, C.J. (Ret.) (Sitting by Assignment)
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-1920

___________________________

Cathy Sayles

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Continental Casualty Company, Formerly doing business as CNA Group Benefits

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: January 23, 2013

Filed: January 31, 2013

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Cathy Sayles appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary judgment

in her action under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act. Upon de novo

1

The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.
review, see Chorosevic v. MetLife Choices, 600 F.3d 934, 941 (8th Cir. 2010), we

find no basis for reversal. The district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
Exhibit 99.4

 Written Statement of the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                   Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the
undersigned Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Interstate
Power and Light Company (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge,
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Thomas M. Walker
--------------------
Thomas M. Walker
May 15, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 2 , 2018.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00579- CR

ROBERT JOHN TREVINO JR., Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 177th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1398156

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N After a plea of guilty, appellant was convicted of the offense of assault of a security officer and sentenced to four years’ confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice on March 4, 2014. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed until July 9, 2018.
A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App.
P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Texas Rule2

of Appellate Procedure 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction.
Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Wise, and Jewell. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).