alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-29-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-29-1998
<CASH>                                           4,105
<SECURITIES>                                    41,341
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,632
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,960)
<INVENTORY>                                    124,419
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               232,793
<PP&E>                                         160,808
<DEPRECIATION>                                (84,509)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 389,218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          147,010
<BONDS>                                        125,130
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        62,471
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   389,218
<SALES>                                      1,831,686
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,831,686
<CGS>                                        1,668,202
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,805,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,320
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,983
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,515
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,468
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,079
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,389
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)

I, Kimmy Lockwood,certify that:

1.               I have reviewed this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 of K-tel International, Inc.;

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

a.               Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b.              Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c.               Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a.               All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.              Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 22, 2006 |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
|                    | /s/ Kimmy  Lockwood |   |
|                    | Kimmy Lockwood |
|                    | Principal  Financial Officer |

 

----
Amendment No. 2
                                       to
                               Employment Contract
                                        

     The Employment Contract between Justin Industries, Inc. and John S. Justin,
Jr. dated December 14, 1994 ("Contract") is hereby amended as follows:

     1.   Employee's term of employment under Paragraph 2 of the Contract is
hereby extended to November 30, 1999.

     2.   The minimum annual Salary to be paid to Employee under Paragraph 2 of
the Contract shall be Six Hundred Twenty Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($620,000).

     Except as hereinabove amended, the Contract shall remain in force as
originally written.
     
     Executed this 15th day of September, 1998.



                              JUSTIN INDUSTRIES, INC.


                              By: /S/ RICHARD J. SAVITZ
                                  Richard J. Savitz
                                  Vice President


                                  /S/ JOHN S. JUSTIN JR.
                                  John S. Justin, Jr.
For questions regarding the DOL COVID-19 Workplace Safety Plan or the Department’s policies and practices related to the

COVID-19 pandemic, please reach out to: 

Revised COVID-19 Exposure Notification Proce

We have made some major updates to the reporting process for COVID-19 exposure. The document titled

DOL Workplace COVID-19 Exposure Notification Process can be found on LaborNet .

Updated the cleaning and notification protocols to align with current Center for Disease Control

(CDC) guidance and General Services Administration (GSA) cleaning requirements. In cases where

an employee has symptoms consistent with COVID-19, or has tested positive for COVID-19, a

cleaning and disinfection (previously special deep cleaning) will be performed when an employee

was in the office within the last 24 hours. If more than 3 days have passed since the person who is

sick was in the office, no additional cleaning will be performed.

Protocols that note where no additional cleaning is required outside of the routine cleaning but where

a notification message is required.

Updated COVID-19 reporting flow charts that reflect the changes to the cleaning and notification

protocols.

Updated COVID-19 email notification templates to add language for situations where offices are

immediately closed following the notification of an employee in the office while symptomatic; added

language for fully vaccinated employees who are not required to quarantine; and created templates

for no additional cleaning is required outside of the routine cleaning but where a notification message

is required.

Please let us know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Julia A. Tritz

Director, Business Operations Center

Last updated: April 20, 2021

LABORNET
**EXHIBIT10.40**

 

**AMENDMENT NO. 1 TOPURCHASE AGREEMENT**

 

THIS AMENDMENTNO. 1 TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made effective as of the 12thday of December, 2005, by and between STEN Corporation, a Minnesotacorporation (“Seller”), and OLD Holdings, LLC, a Minnesota limited liabilitycompany (collectively, “Buyer”).

 

**RECITALS:**

 

WHEREAS, Buyerand Seller entered into a certain Purchase Agreement (the “Original PurchaseAgreement”) dated August 10, 2005, providing for the purchase and sale ofcertain property located at 13828 Lincoln Street NE, Ham Lake, Minnesota (the “Property”);

 

WHEREAS, Buyerand Seller desire to amend the Purchase Agreement to modify and Closing Date;

 

NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for other good and valuableconsideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, theparties agree as follows:

 

# 1.             Interpretation.  The Original Purchase Agreement is herebymodified and supplemented.  Whereverthere exists a conflict between this Amendment and the Original PurchaseAgreement, the provisions of this Amendment shall control.  Except as otherwise indicated, capitalizedterms used herein shall be defined in the manner set forth in the OriginalPurchase Agreement.  Except as modifiedand supplemented herein, the Original Purchase Agreement is in full force andeffect.  From and after the date hereof,the term “Purchase Agreement” shall mean the Original Purchase Agreement asamended hereby.

 

# 2.             Closing Date.  The parties agree that the Closing Date isextended from December 16, 2005, to January 11, 2006.

 

# 3.             Lease.  Seller agrees to waive all Minimum Rent andAdditional Rent due under the Lease for the time period of December 16, 2005,to the Closing Date.

 

# 4.             Offer and Acceptance byFacsimile Transmission.  ThisAmendment may be executed using counterpart signature pages executed separatelywhich, when assembled together, shall constitute a single, integratedagreement.  The parties agree that afacsimile transmission of a counterpart signature page to this Amendmentexecuted by the transmitting party shall have the same force and effect asdelivery of an originally signed counterpart signature page of this Amendmentand shall be binding upon the transmitting party.  For the purposes of this paragraph, atransmittal by facsimile to Buyer shall be to the following facsimilenumber:  (763) 689-9794 (Attention:  Clark A. Joslin), and to Seller at (612)371-3207 (Attention:  Laura L. Krenz).

 

----

 
|       | SELLER:           |
|------------|-------------------|
|       |              |
| ** ** | STEN Corporation  |
|       |              |   |
|       |              |   |
|       | By:               |   |
|       |              |   |
|       |              | Its: |   |
|       |              |
|       |              |
|       | BUYER:            |
|       |              |
|       | OLD Holdings, LLC |
|       | ** **        |
|       |              |
|       | By:               |   |
|       |              |   |
|       |              | Its: |   |

 

2

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

               [CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC. LETTERHEAD]




                                 March 28, 2000


San Juan Basin Royalty Trust
Bank One, Texas, N.A.
Corporate Trust Department
500 Throckmorton Street, Suite 801
Fort Worth, Texas 76102

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc. hereby consents to the use of the
oil and gas reserve information in the San Juan Basin Royalty Trust Securities &
Exchange Commission Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and in the
San Juan Basin Royalty Trust Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 1999
based on reserve reports dated March 22, 2000 prepared by Cawley, Gillespie &
Associates, Inc.


                                        Sincerely,


                                        /s/ CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
                                        CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          12,075
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,993
<INVENTORY>                                     34,128
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,876
<PP&E>                                          32,025
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,218
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 164,694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,520
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,586
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,007
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   164,694
<SALES>                                         39,922
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,922
<CGS>                                           28,130
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,458
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     3
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (487)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (531)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (190)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (721)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (721)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE>
                                                           Exhibit 12

                    KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
          Computations of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                        (Dollars in Thousands)
<CAPTION>

                                     Unaudited
                                       Nine
                                      Months
                                      Ended
                                     Sept 30,                     Year Ended December 31,
                                       1999        1998        1997        1996        1995        1994
<S>                                  <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Net Income. . . . . . . . . . . . .  $ 76,487    $103,765    $ 52,128    $ 96,274    $110,873    $104,526
Taxes on Income . . . . . . . . . .    32,902      44,971      17,408      36,258      51,787      55,349
     Net Income Plus Taxes. . . . .   109,389     148,736      69,536     132,532     162,660     159,875

Fixed Charges:
  Interest on Long-Term Debt. . . .    34,386      45,990      46,062      46,304      47,073      47,827
  Interest on Other Indebtedness. .     2,786       3,368       4,388      11,758       5,190       5,183
  Interest on Corporate-owned
    Life Insurance Borrowings . . .    24,610      32,368      31,253      27,636      25,357      20,990
  Interest Applicable to Rentals. .    18,499      25,106      25,143      25,539      25,375      25,096
      Total Fixed Charges . . . . .    80,281     106,832     106,846     111,237     102,995      99,096

Earnings (1). . . . . . . . . . . .  $189,670    $255,568    $176,382    $243,769    $265,655    $258,971

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.      2.36        2.39        1.65        2.19        2.58        2.61





     (1)  Earnings are deemed to consist of net income to which has been added income taxes (including net
     deferred investment  tax  credit)  and  fixed  charges.  Fixed charges consist of all interest on
     indebtedness, amortization of debt discount and expense, and the portion of rental expense which
     represents an interest factor.
</TABLE>
### FOR PUBLICATION 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  P ALOMAR M EDICAL C ENTER , No. 10-56529

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No.
v. 3:09-cv-00605- BEN-NLS K ATHLEEN S EBELIUS , Secretary of 

#  Southern District of Health and Human Services, California,

Defendant-Appellee. San Diego ORDER 

# 

Filed March 14, 2012 Before: Harry Pregerson, Ronald M. Gould, and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges.

ORDER The panel invites amicus briefs addressing the following questions: (1) Do the regulations at 42 C.F.R. §§ 405.926( l ) and405.980(a)(5) bar administrative review of a contractor’s decision to reopen a Medicare claim, including the contractor’s compliance with the good cause standard for reopening set forth at 42 C.F.R. §§ 405.980(b)(2) and 405.986? (2) If the regulations bar administrative review of a contractor’s decision to reopen, do federal courts have jurisdiction to enforce the agency’s compliance with the good cause standard for reopening?
2973Any person or entity wishing to file a brief as an amicuscuriae in response to this order is granted leave to do so pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29(a). Briefs responding to this order shall be filed within 30 days of the date of this order and shall not exceed 15 pages. 2974 P ALOMAR M EDICAL C ENTER v. S EBELIUS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1629

HEIKO WILLIAM SUNKLER; MICHELLE HERRON

SUNKLER,

Plaintiff - Appellants,

versus

TOWN OF NAGS HEAD, Town of Nags Head, North

Carolina; BRYAN R. SEAWELL, Individually and

as a Nags Head Building Inspector; COURTNEY N.

GALLOP, Individually and as a Nags Head Zoning

Administrator; GARY R. FERGUSON, Individually

and as Planning Director for the Town of Nags

Head,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CA-01-22-H)

Submitted: October 28, 2002 Decided: November 7, 2002

Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Michael B. Brough, THE BROUGH LAW FIRM, Chapel Hill, North

Carolina, for Appellants. L. P. Hornthal, Jr., HORNTHAL, RILEY,

ELLIS & MALAND, Elizabeth City, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Heiko William Sunkler and Michelle Herron Sunkler appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Sunkler v. Town

of Nags Head, No. CA-01-22-H (E.D.N.C. May 17, 2002). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as


Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BSD Medical Corporation (the
“Company”) for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hyrum
A. Mead, President (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











Date:
            November
      14, 2008By:
            /s/ Hyrum A.
      MeadHyrum
      A. MeadPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Office of Personnel Management 5 CFR Part 532
RIN 3206-AK91
 AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.
 ACTION: Final rule.
 SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management is issuing a final rule to remove Adams County, CO, from the Adams-Denver, CO, Federal Wage System nonappropriated fund (NAF) wage area, redefine Arapahoe County, CO, from the area of application to the survey area, and change the Adams-Denver wage area's name to Arapahoe-Denver. These changes are necessary because the closure of Fitzsimons Army Medical Center in Adams County left the Adams-Denver survey area without a host activity to conduct local NAF wage surveys.
 DATES: This rule is effective on December 14, 2005.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Gonzalez, (202) 606-2838; e-mail 
                        *pay-performance-policy@opm.gov;*
                         or FAX: (202) 606-4264.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 22, 2005, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) issued a proposed rule (70 FR 48899) to remove Adams County, CO, from the Adams-Denver, CO, Federal Wage System nonappropriated fund wage area, redefine Arapahoe County, CO, from the area of application to the survey area, and change the Adams-Denver wage area's name to Arapahoe-Denver. The proposed rule had a 30-day comment period, during which OPM received no comments. Regulatory Flexibility Act I certify that these regulations will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they will affect only Federal agencies and employees. List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532 Administrative practice and procedure
Freedom of information
Government employees
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
Wages
 Office of Personnel Management. Linda M. Springer, Director.
 Accordingly, the Office of Personnel Management is amending 5 CFR part 532 as follows: PART 532—PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS
 1.The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows: Authority:
                        5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552. 2.In appendix D to subpart B, the wage area listing for the State of Colorado is amended by revising the listing for Adams-Denver to read as follows: Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532—Nonappropriated Fund Wage and Survey Areas 
 **Colorado****Arapahoe-Denver***Survey Area*Colorado:ArapahoeDenver*Area of Application. Survey area plus:*Colorado:Mesa


[FR Doc. 05-22539 Filed 11-10-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6325-39-P