alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                    ------------


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ZiLOG, Inc. on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), James Thorburn, as Chief
Executive Officer of ZiLOG, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of ZiLOG, INC.

                               Date:  March 27, 2003
                               By:    /s/ James Thorburn
                                      James Thorburn
                                      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by ZiLOG, Inc. for purposes of
ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

In connection with the Annual Report of ZiLOG, Inc. on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Perry J. Grace, as Chief
Financial Officer of ZiLOG, Inc., certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
my knowledge that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of ZiLOG, Inc..

                               Date:  March 27, 2003
                               By:    /s/ Perry J. Grace
                                      Perry J. Grace
                                      Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by ZiLOG, Inc. for purposes of
ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### THE STATE OF NEVADA, Petitioner, v. THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF DOUGLAS, THE HONORABLE DAVID R. GAMBLE, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondent, EDWIN FERRELL DOUGLASS, Real Party in Interest.

No. 18266

March 31, 1988

752 P.2d 238

*Brian McKay,*Attorney General; *Brent T. Kolvet,*District Attorney, and *Harold Kuehn,*Deputy District Attorney, Douglas County, for Petitioner.

*92
      *Loren Graham,*Zephyr Cove, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

This petition for a writ of certiorari challenges an order of the district court ruling that individuals charged with violating NRS 484.379 are entitled to a jury trial, reversing the conviction of the real party in interest herein, and remanding the matter to the justice’s court for a jury trial.

In Blanton v. North Las Vegas Mun. Ct. 103 Nev. 623 , 748 P.2d 494 (1987), this court concluded that driving under the influence of alcohol, when charged as a misdemeanor, is a “petty” offense for which trial by jury is not constitutionally mandated. *See also*Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970); State v. Smith, 99 Nev. 806, 672 P.2d 631 (1983). Our holding in *Blanton*applies whether the individual is charged in municipal court or justice’s court. Respondent has presented no authorities or arguments not considered by this court in reaching its decision in *Blanton.*

Accordingly, we grant this petition.1

This petition was previously granted in an unpublished order of this court. Pursuant to a request, we have determined that our decision should be issued in a published opinion. Accordingly, we hereby issue this opinion in place of our order dismissing this appeal filed December 31, 1987. We note that on December 31, 1987, the clerk of this court issued a writ of certiorari, pursuant to our order, compelling the district court to vacate its order reversing the conviction of real party in interest Edwin Ferrell Douglass, and to enter a new order consistent with our decision in *Blanton, supra.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration # 10203 and # 10204] 

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 2. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Texas (FEMA-1606-DR), dated September 24, 2005. 

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Rita.                     

*Incident Period:*                         September 23, 2005, and continuing through October 14, 2005.                     

*Effective Date:*                         October 14, 2005.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         November 23, 2005.                     

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         June 26, 2006.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, National Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Texas, dated September 24, 2005, is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning September 23, 2005, and continuing through October 14, 2005. 

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 05-21446 Filed 10-26-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

                                                                 Exhibit 3

                **NAVISTAR FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                         AND SUBSIDIARIES

               ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BY-LAWS**

The following documents of Navistar Financial Corporation are
incorporated herein by reference:

3.1     Restated  Certificate of Incorporation  of  Navistar Financial
        Corporation (as amended  and in effect on  December 15, 1987).
        Filed on  Form  8-K dated  December 17, 1987.  Commission File
        No. 001-04146.

3.2     The  By-Laws  of Navistar  Financial  Corporation (as  amended
        February 29, 1988). Filed on Form 10-K dated January 19, 1989.
        Commission File No. 001-04146.

3.3     Amendment to  the  By-Laws  of Navistar Financial Corporation.
        Filed as  Exhibit 3.1 on  Form  10-K  dated December 18, 2003.
        Commission File No. 001-04146.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 511 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 511

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 16, 2009

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to terminate certain 
    easements held by the Secretary on land owned by the Village of 
     Caseyville, Illinois, and to terminate associated contractual 
                     arrangements with the Village.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF NRCS EASEMENTS AND ASSOCIATED CONTRACTUAL 
              ARRANGEMENTS, VILLAGE OF CASEYVILLE, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Termination Authorized.--The Secretary of Agriculture may 
terminate any easement held by the Secretary on land owned by the 
Village of Caseyville, Illinois, and terminate associated contractual 
arrangements with the Village.
    (b) Consideration.--As consideration for the termination of an 
easement and associated contractual arrangements under subsection (a), 
the Village of Caseyville, Illinois, shall enter into such compensatory 
arrangements with the Secretary as determined to be appropriate by the 
Secretary.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 15, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# L_2007140EN.01005801.xml

| 1.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 140/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 140/58

---

Corrigendum to Commission Directive 2007/27/EC of 15 May 2007 amending certain Annexes to Council Directives 86/362/EEC, 86/363/EEC and 90/642/EEC as regards maximum residue levels for etoxazole, indoxacarb, mesosulfuron, 1-methylcyclopropene, MCPA and MCPB, tolyfluanid and triticonazole

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 128 of 16 May 2007
  )

On page 37, in Annex III, in the entry against ‘(e) Wild berries and wild fruit’, in the column headed ‘Etoxazole’:

for:

‘0,02 (*)’,

read:

‘0,02 (*) (p)’;

on page 40, in the entry against ‘(b) Head brassica, Others’, in the column headed ‘Indoxacarb as sum of the isomers S and R’:

for:

‘0,2 (*) (p)’,

read:

‘0,02 (*) (p)’;

and on page 41, in the entry against ‘3. Pulses’, in the column headed ‘1-methylcyclopropene’:

for:

‘0,01 (p)’,

read:

‘0,01 (*) (p)’.

---
# United Sta tes Court of Appe als For the Seventh Circuit Chicag o, Illino is 60604 Janua ry 5, 2001 Before Hon. Richard A. Posner, Circu it Jud ge Hon. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circu it Jud ge Hon. Terence T. E

vans, Circu

it Jud ge Nos. 00-3004 and 00- 3006 UNITED STATES

OF AMERICA, Plain tiff -App ellee,
v. KENNETH P. KO NTNY and JO ANN L. KONTNY, Defen dants-A ppellants. App eals f rom the Unite d Sta

tes Di stri ct Court f or the W ester n District of Wisconsin. No. 00 CR 4 John C. Shabaz, Chief Judge
.

Order Correctin g Opinion The sli p opinion in this case issu ed on January 4, 2001, is corrected as f ollows: P. 6, eigh th li ne: “argued” i s changed to “argue”. P. 8, seventh l ine before l ast paragrap h brea k: “had fi rm indic ations” i s changed to “did not have f

irm indi cations”
. S O O RDERED .
II 

Calendar No. 491 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5395 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 12, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

JULY 28, 2010 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 151 North Maitland Avenue in Maitland, Florida, as the ‘‘Paula Hawkins Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PAULA HAWKINS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 151 North Maitland Avenue in 

6 Maitland, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Paula Hawkins Post Office Building’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5395 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Paula Hawkins Post 

5 Office Building’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 491 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5395 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. in Maitland, Florida, as the ‘‘Paula Hawkins al Service located at 151 North Maitland Avenue 

JULY 28, 2010 

Reported without amendment 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### DANNY BRYAN and KENNETH BRYAN, Appellants, v. CARL E. ALLEN, Respondent.

No. 10693

July 9, 1980

613 P.2d 412

*James J. Brown,*Las Vegas, for Appellants.

*Rose, Edwards, Hunt & Pearson, Ltd.,*Las Vegas, for Respondent.

1

The Chief Justice designated The Honorable David Zenoff, Senior Justice, to sit in this case in place of The Honorable E. M. Gunderson, Justice. Nev. Const, art. 6, subsection 19; SCR 10.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Danny and Kenneth Bryan, two pedestrians, were injured by respondent Carl Allen’s negligent operation of an automobile. *573At the time of the accident, the Nevada Motor Vehicle Insurance Act (Chapter 698 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, *repealed*1979 Nev. Stat., ch. 660, § 9) was still in effect. The Bryans received basic reparation benefits to cover their economic losses. *See*NRS 698.040; 698.070. Subsequently, the Bryans brought this tort action against Allen. *See*NRS 698.280(l)(i). No transcript of the trial appears in the record. The jury, instructed on the computation of damages for both economic and noneconomic detriment, returned a general verdict far in excess of the previously received reparation benefits. Upon respondent Allen’s motion, the district court reduced the jury award by the amount of those previously paid benefits, and entered judgment accordingly. The Bryans appeal, contending that the reduction was error. We affirm.

Under Nevada’s no-fault system, an injured party was not entitled to multiple recovery for the same loss. Cooke v. Safeco Ins. Co., 94 Nev. 745, 587 P.2d 1324 (1978); Travelers Insurance Co. v. Lopez, 93 Nev. 463, 567 P.2d 471 (1977). Indeed, the Legislature specifically abolished tort liability with respect to injuries compensated by the payment of basic reparation benefits. NRS 698.280(1)(h).

Here, it is undisputed that appellants received basic reparation benefits for their economic losses. It is also undisputed that the jury returned its general verdict after having been instructed on the computation of damages for both economic and noneconomic detriment and after having received evidence of economic loss.

A jury verdict is presumptively valid; absent a showing in the record, this Court will not read error into a general verdict. J.C. Penney Co. v. Gravelle, 62 Nev. 439, 455, 155 P.2d 477, 484 (1944). Appellants have not met their burden, either in the court below or on appeal, of establishing that their tort recovery did not include previously paid benefits. Easom v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc., 560 P.2d 117 (Kan. 1977). The district court therefore properly reduced appellants’ jury award. By so doing, the court did not encroach upon the province of the jury. Sec Van Fleet v. O’Neil, 44 Nev. 216, 233-34, 192 P.384, 390 (1920). Rather, the court merely insured that appellants could not recover in a tort action what the Legislature had, by enacting NRS 698.280, specifically prohibited them from recovering.

*574The judgment is affirmed.

Mowbray, C. J., Thompson, Manoukian, and Batjer, JJ., and Zenoff, Sr. J.,1 concur.
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

C.S., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, U.S.

CENSUS BUREAU, Los Angeles, CA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 22-1228

Issued: September 29, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On August 22, 2022 appellant filed an appeal from a December 29, 2021 merit decision of 

the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 22-1228.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’Compensation Act.1 

For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review 

authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s 

decision.2

The 180th day following the December 29, 2021 decision was June 27, 2022. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until August 22, 2022, more than 180 days after the

December 29, 2021 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 22-1228 is 

untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not offered 

a reason to explain the failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

2

 20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e).
2

establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP 

within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed 

as No. 22-1228, must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 22-1228 is dismissed.

Issued: September 29, 2022

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id. at 

§ 501.6(d).
Exhibit 10.11
​
Dr Michael Skynner
​
​
​
January 5, 2022
​
Dear Michael,
Amendment to your service agreement with BicycleTX Limited (the “Company”) dated 26 September 2019 (the “Service Agreement”)
Following our recent discussions regarding a move from the Chief Operating Officer role to the new Chief Technology Officer role, I am happy to write to you to confirm this agreed move and to confirm the applicable amendments to the terms set out in your Service Agreement.
With effect from 3 January 2022: 
		1.	Clause 2.1 will be amended such that you shall serve as Chief Technology Officer (“CTO”) instead of COO.

		2.	Any further references in the Service Agreement to COO will now read CTO.

		3.	Clause 4.1 will be deleted and replaced with:


Your salary will be £405,100 per annum paid monthly in arrears on or about the last working day of each month (less statutory and voluntary deductions) (“Salary”). Your Salary will be reviewed annually in accordance with the Company's practices from time to time (which is expected to be by the end of the first quarter of each year). You will be notified in writing of any changes to your Salary or benefits.
		4.	The percentage figure set out twice in the body of Clause 4.4 will be amended from 40% to 45%.


The remaining terms of your employment shall continue to apply without change.
Please sign a copy of this letter where indicated below to acknowledge receipt and your agreement to the terms of this letter.
​
​

​
BicycleTx Limited
Building 900
Babraham Research Campus
Cambridge CB22 3AT
​
Tel: +44 (0)1223 261503
www.bicycletherapeutics.com
​
BicycleTx Ltd. Company number 11036101. Registered in England.
8553711 v2
​



​






If you have any questions regarding the information in this letter, please let me know.
Yours sincerely
​
/s/ Kevin Lee
Kevin Lee, CEO
For and on behalf of the Company
​
​
Signed:/s/ Michael Skynner​ ​
Name:Michael Skynner
​
Date:January 6, 2022​ ​

​
BicycleTx Limited
Building 900
Babraham Research Campus
Cambridge CB22 3AT
​
Tel: +44 (0)1223 261503
www.bicycletherapeutics.com
​
BicycleTx Ltd. Company number 11036101. Registered in England.
8553711 v2
​



​
# L_2007010EN.01000901.xml

| 17.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 10/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 10/9

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 34/2007

of 16 January 2007

fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to applications for import licences for bananas originating in the ACP countries for the period to 31 December 2007

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1964/2005 of 29 November 2005 on the tariff rates for bananas (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1789/2006 of 5 December 2006 opening and providing for the administration of the tariff quota for bananas falling under CN code 0803 00 19 originating in ACP countries for the period 1 January to 31 December 2007 (2), and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The applications for import licences submitted in the Member States under Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1789/2006 and sent to the Commission in accordance with Article 5 of that Regulation exceed the available quantities fixed in Article 2(a) thereof, i.e. 146 848 tonnes for the operators referred to in Chapter II. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The applications for import licences submitted in the Member States under Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1789/2006 and sent to the Commission in accordance with Article 5 of that Regulation exceed the available quantities fixed in Article 2(a) thereof, i.e. 146 848 tonnes for the operators referred to in Chapter II.

| (2) | The allocation coefficient to be applied to each application should therefore be fixed, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The allocation coefficient to be applied to each application should therefore be fixed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

A reduction coefficient of 89,823072 % shall be applied to each import licence application submitted by the operators referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 1789/2006 under the tariff subquota of 146 848 tonnes.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 January 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 316, 2.12.2005, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 339, 6.12.2006, p. 3.

2

---