alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### REFUGIO DEL HOYO, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 24614

December 30, 1993

866 P.2d 261

*James J. Jackson,*Public Defender and *Janet S. Bessemer,*Chief Appellate Public Defender, Carson City, for Appellant.

*Frankie Sue Del Papa,*Attorney General, Carson City; *Michael McCormick,*District Attorney and *Conrad Hafen,*Deputy District Attorney, Humboldt County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

This is an appeal from an order of the district court revoking appellant’s probation and directing imposition of a three year sentence which was previously suspended.

On May 1, 1990, the district court convicted appellant, pursuant to a guilty plea, of one count of attempted burglary. The district court sentenced appellant to serve a term of three years in *1217the Nevada State Prison. The district court suspended the sentence and placed appellant on probation for three years. No direct appeal was taken.

On January 8, 1993, appellant filed in the district court a “motion for disposition of charges.” In his motion, appellant noted that he was incarcerated in the State of Arizona. Appellant argued that the district court should accept a plea of no contest to the charge of violating the terms of probation and order appellant’s sentence to run concurrently with his Arizona sentence. Appellant argued that the district court should compel the district attorney to proceed with any probation revocation proceedings immediately. The state opposed the motion. On March 23, 1993, the district court denied appellant’s motion for disposition of charges. The district court concluded that the district attorney has the discretion to institute probation revocation proceedings after appellant completes his Arizona sentence.

On July 12, 1993, following completion of appellant’s Arizona sentence, the district court conducted a hearing regarding revocation of appellant’s probation. On July 14, 1993, the district court ordered appellant’s probation revoked and directed imposition of the three year sentence which was previously suspended. This appeal followed.

Appellant contends that the refusal of the district attorney to proceed with the revocation proceeding prior to the completion by appellant of his Arizona sentence denied appellant the basic protections to which he is entitled in a probation revocation proceeding. Specifically, appellant argues that it was fundamentally unfair for the district attorney to wait until after appellant completed his Arizona sentence before initiating probation revocation proceedings because the delay deprived the district court of the opportunity of sentencing appellant to concurrent terms. Appellant’s contention lacks merit. The United States Supreme Court “has never held . . . that a prisoner subject to a probation-violation detainer has a constitutional right to a speedy probation-revocation hearing.” Carchman v. Nash, 473 U.S. 716, 731 n.10 (1985). We likewise decline to find a right to a speedy probation-revocation proceeding. Accordingly, we affirm.1

1

Pursuant to NRAP 34(f)(1), we have determined that oral argument is not warranted in this appeal.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       165,485,352
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   3,026,865
<MORTGAGE>                                  13,460,284
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  224,774
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             192,817,966
<CASH>                                       3,233,439
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              96,116
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      27,523,532
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             249,769,767
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            185,449,221
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         13,268,614
<POLICY-OTHER>                               1,679,784
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,961,493
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,447,418
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,096,963
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               249,769,767
<PREMIUMS>                                  26,834,172
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          9,731,519
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                            (54,122)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 224,476
<BENEFITS>                                  13,651,492
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     79,866
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        21,131,149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,873,538
<INCOME-TAX>                                   262,295
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,611,243
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,611,243
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 10.11 2005 Performance Criteria
under the
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Annual Incentive Compensation Plan The Compensation Committee of the Registrants Board of Directors has approved earnings per
share targets as the sole performance criteria for 2005 under the Registrants Annual Incentive
Compensation Plan for all of the Companys executive officers except for Ms. Mindy Meads, Executive
Vice President of the Registrant and President and Chief Executive Officer of Lands End, Inc., for
whom the criteria are 50% earnings per share and 50% Lands End, Inc.s pre-tax profit ratio.
These performance criteria will be cancelled without any obligation on the part of the Registrant
upon effectiveness of the pending business combination transaction between the Registrant and Kmart
Holding Corporation.
# C_2008127EN.01000301.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5027 — JBS/Cremonini/Inalca)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 127/05)

On 25 February 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5027. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5027. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00473

- CV

Katrina J. (“Nina”) Morris, Appellant

v.

Maansi Piparia, M.D.; April Schiemenz, M.D.; and Christina Sebestyen, M.D., P.A. d/b/a ObGyn North, Appellee s

FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT C O URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D

- 1

- GN

- 17

- 000374, THE HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Katrina J. ( “ Nina ” ) Morris , seeking to invoke our jurisdiction to review an

interlocutory order, has filed an unopposed petition for permissive a p peal under S ub s ection

51.014(f) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. 1 Accompanying Morris ’ s petition is

an order from the trial court that satisfies Subsection (d). The trial court ’ s order identifies two

controlling questions of law as to whic h there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion

1 See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.014(f) (“An appellate court may accept an appeal permitted by Subsection (d) if the appealing par ty, not later than the 15th day after the date the trial court signs the order to be appealed, files in the court of appeals having appellate jurisdiction over the action an application for interlocutory appeal explaining why an appeal is

warranted under S ubs ecti on (d).”); see als o id. § 51.014(d) (“[A] trial court in a civil action may, by written order, permit an appeal from an order that is not otherwise appealable if: (1) the order to be appealed involves a controlling question of law as to which there is a su bstantial ground for difference of opinion; and (2) an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation.”); Tex. R. App. P. 28.3 (implementing rule).2

and finds that an im mediate appeal of the controlling questions of law identified in the order

would materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. Se e Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.

Code § 51.014(d).

We conclude that the appeal is warranted, and we accept it. See id. § 51.014(f).

The appeal will proceed under the rules governing accelerated appeals, and notice of appeal is

deemed to have been filed as of the date of this order. See id. ; Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(k).

It is ordered on September 3, 2020.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Kelly
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, David W. Wehlmann, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Grey Wolf, Inc;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-47986];  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures presented in this annual report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s quarter ended December 31, 2003 that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date:  August 9, 2004 By:  /s/ David W. Wehlmann    David W. Wehlmann    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Alliant Energy Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ William D. Harvey

William D. Harvey

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

/s/ Eliot G. Protsch

Eliot G. Protsch

Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

November 8, 2005
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5395 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

151 North Maitland Avenue in Maitland, Florida, as the ‘‘Paula Hawkins 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2010 

Mr. MICA (for himself, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. BOYD, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of 

Florida, Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Mr. BUCHANAN, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of Florida, 

Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. GRAYSON, Mr. KLEIN of Florida, Ms. KOSMAS, Mr. MACK, Mr. MEEK of Florida, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. POSEY, Mr. PUTNAM, Mr. ROONEY, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. 

STEARNS, Mr. YOUNG of Florida, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, and Mr. 

HASTINGS of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 151 North Maitland Avenue in Maitland, Florida, as the ‘‘Paula Hawkins Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PAULA HAWKINS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 151 North Maitland Avenue in 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5395 IH

1 Maitland, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Paula Hawkins Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the Paula Hawkins Post 

7 Office Building. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       192,959,373
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   3,191,974
<MORTGAGE>                                  14,987,494
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  376,266
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             222,089,009
<CASH>                                       4,267,073
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             438,740
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      28,425,236
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             291,002,636
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            210,683,643
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         20,813,100
<POLICY-OTHER>                               1,925,777
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,842,609
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,447,902
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,539,989
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               291,002,636
<PREMIUMS>                                  10,871,846
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          3,752,975
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              25,459
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  89,590
<BENEFITS>                                   5,998,698
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  (624,681)
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         8,369,852
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                996,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   278,880
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            717,120
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   717,120
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT ON CONSOLIDATED INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS AND THE STATEMENT
OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL CONDITION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             OCT-31-2000<F1>
<PERIOD-END>                                  APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                           30,000
<SECURITIES>                                    105,400
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1,351,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (9,400)
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0
<PP&E>                                           13,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (7,500)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                2,196,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 0
<BONDS>                                       1,497,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        171,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      127,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  2,196,300
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 88,100
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    25,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 12,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  2,300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               23,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  23,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (9,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              14,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     14,200
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
<FN>
<F1>  THE CORPORATION'S STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION IS UNCLASSIFIED;
THEREFORE, THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN CURRENT AND LONG-TERM ASSETS AND
LIABILITIES IS NOT AVAILABLE.
</FN>



</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Williams Coal Seam Royalty
Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the
trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Trust.




                                 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FOR
                                 WILLIAMS COAL SEAM GAS ROYALTY TRUST


Date: March 25, 2003           By:/s/ Ron E. Hooper
                                    ----------------------------------------
                                    Ron E. Hooper,
                                    Senior Vice President, Royalty Management