alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2007069EN.01002001.xml

| 9.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 69/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 69/20

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 251/2007

of 8 March 2007

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 958/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 8 March 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 8 March 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 8 March 2007, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 shall be 26,793 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 March 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 March 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1585/2006 (OJ L 294, 25.10.2006, p. 19).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 49.

2

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6496

KENNETH GREEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNKNOWN SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OFFICIALS; SOUTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DIVISION, Defendants - Appellees, and CLERK OF THE SOUTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-4112-9-20BG) Submitted: July 24, 2003 Decided: July 30, 2003 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Green, Appellant Pro Se. Ruskin C. Foster, MCCUTCHEN, BLANTON, JOHNSON & BARNETTE, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Kenneth Green seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting a magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as to some claims. The court ordered that Green’s suit continue as to remaining claims. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). Because it does not dispose of all of his § 1983 claims, the order Green seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Intelligent Systems Corporation
Norcross, GA

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements Form S-8 No. 333-58134 and No. 333-32157 of our report dated February
22, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Intelligent Systems Corporation and Subsidiaries appearing in the company's
annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ Tauber & Balser, P.C.

Tauber & Balser, P.C.

Atlanta, Georgia
March 28, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1999 FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN IES UTILITIES INC.'S FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000052485
<NAME>                        IES UTILITIES INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      1,352,871
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    107,220
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         99,120
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       15,201
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 133,491
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,707,903
<COMMON>                                       33,427
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      279,042
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            245,626
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 558,095
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    18,320
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           551,086
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             9,694
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  51,140
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    11,427
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               12,132
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 496,009
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  1,707,903
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      209,265
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           10,216  <F1>
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     173,092
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     173,092 <F1>
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        36,173
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             1,706
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 37,879
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       13,204
<NET-INCOME>                                   14,459
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    229
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  14,230
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       43,976
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      42,615
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         53,086
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0  <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0  <F2>
        
<FN>
<F1>   Income  tax  expense  is  not  included  in  Operating   Expense  in  the
       Consolidated Statements of Income.
<F2>   Earnings  per share of common stock is not  reflected  because all common
       shares are held by Interstate Energy Corporation.
</FN>

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Strategic Internet
Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"). I, Abbas Salih, Chief Financial Officer of the
company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





|Date: | November 10, 2008 |  | /s/
      Abbas Salih     
|----- | ----------------- |  | --------------------------
|      |                   |  | Abbas Salih, CFO, Director

---
# L_2007097EN.01007001.xml

| 12.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 97/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 97/70

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 372/2007 of 2 April 2007 laying down transitional migration limits for plasticisers in gaskets in lids intended to come into contact with foods

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 92 of 3 April 2007
  )

On page 9, recital 2 is replaced by the following:

| ‘(2) | Commission Directive 2007/19/EC of 2 April 2007 amending Directive 2002/72/EC relating to plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food (3) clarifies that gaskets in lids fall under the scope of Directive 2002/72/EC. It stipulates that Member States have to adopt measures by 1 May 2008 that allow free circulation of gaskets in lids if they comply with SML. Non-compliant gaskets in lids will be prohibited as from 1 July 2008.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘(2)

Commission Directive 2007/19/EC of 2 April 2007 amending Directive 2002/72/EC relating to plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food (3) clarifies that gaskets in lids fall under the scope of Directive 2002/72/EC. It stipulates that Member States have to adopt measures by 1 May 2008 that allow free circulation of gaskets in lids if they comply with SML. Non-compliant gaskets in lids will be prohibited as from 1 July 2008.’

On page 9, footnote 3 is replaced by the following:

‘
  OJ L 91, 31.3.2007, p. 17, corrected by OJ L 97, 12.4.2007, p. 50.’

---
Exhibit 12.2

INTERSTATE POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
     AND PREFERRED DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS

|                                                    | Three Months          |     
|--------------------------------------------------- | --------------------- | ----
|                                                    | Ended March 31,       |     
|                                                    |                       |     
|                                                    | 2009                  | 2008
|                                                    |                       |     
|                                                    | (dollars in millions)
|EARNINGS:                                           |                       |     
|Net income                                          |                       | $41 
|Income tax expense (benefit) (a)                    |                       | (26 
|                                                    |                       |     
|Income before income taxes                          |                       | 15  
|Fixed charges as defined                            |                       | 18  
|                                                    |                       |     
|Total earnings as defined                           |                       | $33 
|                                                    |                       |     
|FIXED CHARGES:                                      |                      
|Interest expense                                    |                       | $17 
|Estimated interest component of rent expense        |                       | 0   
|                                                    |                       |     
|Total fixed charges as defined                      |                       | $18 
|                                                    |                       |     
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                  |                       | 1.8 
|                                                    |                       |     
|Preferred dividend requirements (pre-tax basis) (b) |                       | $1  
|                                                    |                       |     
|Fixed charges and preferred dividend requirements   |                       | $19 
|                                                    |                       |     
|Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and     |                      
|Preferred Dividend Requirements                     |                       | 1.7 
|                                                    |                       |     

(a) Includes net interest related to
unrecognized tax benefits.

(b) Preferred dividend requirements
(pre-tax basis) are computed by dividing the preferred dividend requirements by one
hundred percent minus the respective year-to-date effective income tax rate.
DOL 2020 Transition Materials

Cross-Agency Paper Table of Contents

TOC # Cross-Agency Paper Topics Agency POC Status

1 Table of Contents

2 DOL Organizational Chart & Points of Contact OASAM Braye Cloud

3 DOL Workforce At-A-Glance OASAM (OHR) Sydney Rose Updated information available monthly

4 Top Issues OSEC

 OASAM

Nathan Mehrens

Al Stewart

5 DOL Budget 

5.a – DOL Budget & FTE History FY12-20

5.b – Program Direction and Support Budget Overview

5.c – Transfers Reprogrammings and other Authorities

5.d – DOL Discretionary Budget Table

5.e – FY 2012-2021 Actuals

OASAM (DBC) Geoff Kenyon

Mark Wichlin

6 DOL’s response to the COVID pandemic (external facing) OSHA

WHD

ETA

EBSA

OWCP

ILAB

Mandy Edens

Michael Kravitz

Melissa Smith

Tim Hauser

Tamara Webster

Bob Shepherd

7 DOL’s response to the COVID pandemic (internal facing) OASAM Braye Cloud

8 Benefits.gov and DisasterAssistance.gov OASAM (OCIO) Wendy Manning

9 IT Modernization OASAM (OCIO) Wendy Manning

10 2022-2026 Strategic Plan Development OASAM (PMC) Dennis Johnson

11 Enterprise Risk Management OCFO Kevin Brown

12 Debt Management OCFO Kevin Brown

13 Evidence Act implementation OASP Stephanie Swirsky

14 USMCA trade agreement OASAM 

ILAB

WHD

Geoff Kenyon

Matt Levin

Michael Kravitz

15 DOL Real Property Initiatives OASAM (BOC) Julia Tritz

16 Chief Evaluation Office Reports OASP Stephanie Swirsky Updated information available upon request.

17 DOL Regulatory Agenda OASP Stephanie Swirsky Fall Regulatory Agenda release expected in November 2020

18 DOL EO 13771 Cost Savings for FY 17-21 OASP Stephanie Swirsky

19 GAO Engagements – In progress

19.a - Active Studies

19.b - Upcoming Reports January – March 2021

OASP Stephanie Swirsky Updated information available upon request.

20 GAO Engagements – Final

20.a - Recently Published & Archived

20.b - Open Recommendations

OASP Stephanie Swirsky Updated information available upon request.

21 Federal Mandated Trainings OASAM (OHR) Sydney Rose

22 Acronym List OASAM Braye Cloud
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Unified Western Grocers Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended
October 2, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alfred A. Plamann, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 11, 2005



/s/ ALFRED A. PLAMANNAlfred A. PlamannPresident and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY
  ACT

I, Ralph Shearing, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report for period ending June 30, 2003 on
  Form 10-QSB of Strategic Internet Investments Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
  the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
  report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
  included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
  financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
  as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
  and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
  Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
  information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
  period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
  procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly
  report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
  of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
  Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
  on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
  of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
  which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
  and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors
  any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
  who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
  quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
  or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
  to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
  with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

|Date: August 19, 2003 | /s/ Ralph Shearing     
|--------------------- | -----------------------
|                      |                        
|                      | Ralph Shearing         
|                      | Chief Executive Officer

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

                    The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) announces the appointment of members to the AHRQ Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board (PRB). This action is being taken in accordance with Title 5, U.S.C., Section 4314(c)(4) of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, which requires members of the performance review boards to be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

The function of the PRB is to ensure consistency, stability and objectivity in the SES performance appraisals, and to make recommendations to the Director, AHRQ, relating to the performance of senior executives in the Agency.

The following persons will serve on the AHRQ SES Performance Review Board: Helen Burstin, Francis Chesley, Steven Cohen, J. Michael Fitzmaurice, Irene Fraser, George Grob, Kathleen Kendrick, Anna Marsh, Robert McSwain, William Munier, Jean Slutsky, Christine Williams, and Phyllis Zucker.

For further information about the AHRQ Performance Review Board, contact Mr. Jeffrey Toven, Office of Performance, Accountability, Resources, and Technology, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Road, Suite 4329, Rockville, Maryland 20850.

Dated: October 18, 2005.

Carolyn M. Clancy,

Director, AHRQ.

[FR Doc. 05-21472  Filed 10-26-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-90-M