alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007134EN.01000401.xml

| 16.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4191 — Thales/DCN)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 134/02)

On 19 March 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4191. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4191. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel, Intergenerational Dietary Patterns.                    

*Date:*                         November 30, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Carla T. Walls, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6898,                         *wallsc@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 24, 2005.

Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-22001 Filed 11-3-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

D.R., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, NAVAL 

MEDICAL CENTER PORTSMOUTH, 

Portsmouth, VA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0095

Issued: March 23, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On October 31, 2022 appellant sought an appeal from an October 26, 2022 decision of 

the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards 

assigned Docket No. 23-0095.

The Board, having duly considered the matter, notes that its jurisdiction is limited to the 

review of final adverse OWCP decisions issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act (FECA).1 This jurisdiction encompasses any final decision issued by OWCP within 180 

days of the date appellant filed his appeal.2 The case record as transmitted to the Board does not 

contain a final adverse decision of OWCP issued within 180 days from the date of docketing of 

the current appeal. In the October 26, 2022 decision, OWCP’s hearing representative vacated 

OWCP’s July 21, 2022 decision and remanded the case to OWCP for further development of the 

factual and medical evidence, followed by a de novo decision. As such, this case is in an 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the date of 

issuance of a decision of the OWCP.”
2

interlocutory posture.3 As there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of 

the filing of this appeal,4 over which the Board may properly exercise jurisdiction, the Board 

concludes that the appeal docketed as Docket No. 23-0095 must be dismissed.5 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as Docket No. 23-0095 is 

dismissed.

Issued: March 23, 2023

Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3

See id. at § 501.2(c)(2), which provides: “There will be no appeal with respect to any interlocutory matter 

decided (or not decided) by OWCP during the pendency of a case.”;see also L.F., Docket No. 21 -0210 (issued 

April 27, 2022); M.B., Docket No. 21-0127 (issued November 12, 2021); T.D., Docket No. 19 -1506 n.4 (issued 

November 4, 2020); K.K., Docket No. 19-0652 (issued September 19, 2019).

4

See supra note 2.

5 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance. ” 

20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d).
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Alliant Energy Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ William D. Harvey

William D. Harvey

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

/s/ Eliot G. Protsch

Eliot G. Protsch

Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

August 6, 2007
# C_2007109EN.01000301.xml

| 15.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4649 — Charterhouse/ISTA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 109/02)

On 8 May 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4649. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4649. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1


<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                               95,300
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       278,800
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    519,000
<PP&E>                            1,905,000
<DEPRECIATION>                      898,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    1,950,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             1,083,000
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                             75,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      1,950,000
<SALES>                           1,712,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  1,712,000
<CGS>                             1,412,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     1,780,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   69,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     857,000
<INCOME-TAX>                          6,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 850,000
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        850,000
<EPS-BASIC>                               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0


</TABLE>
#### Aydin ATAKENT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and Wyeth, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-2408.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 28, 2005.

*370William K. Guild, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Edward J. Boyle, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellees.

Present: NEWMAN, WESLEY, and HALL, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

Familiarity by the parties is assumed as to the facts, the procedural context, and the specification of appellate issues. After undertaking *de novo*review of the district court judgment dismissing plaintiff’s claims, we now AFFIRM.

In light of *Pulvers v. First UNUM Life Insurance Co.,*210 F.3d 89, 92 (2d Cir. 2000), we review Prudential’s determination of plaintiffs disability claim under an “arbitrary and capricious” standard. Under that standard, we conclude that Prudential’s determination was not “without reason, unsupported by substantial evidence or erroneous as a matter of law.” *Pagan v. NYNEX Pension Plan,*52 F.3d 438, 442 (2d Cir.1995) (internal quotations omitted). Prudential gave reasons for its conclusions, and supported those conclusions with “such evidence that a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support [its] conclusion[s;] ... more than a scintilla but less than a preponderance.” *Miller v. United Welfare Fund,*72 F.3d 1066, 1072 (2d Cir.1995) (internal quotations omitted).

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
#### IN RE CHAVIS and IN RE CURRY and IN RE OUTLAW

No. 9 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 579.

Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 31 January 1977.
#### In the Matter of the Petition of the Westover Chemical Company, Appellant, for a Writ of Prohibition against the City Court of the City of New York et al., Respondents.

*Matter of Westover Chemical Co.*v. *City Court, N. Y. City,*183 App. Div. 931, affirmed.

(Argued October 1, 1918;

decided October 15, 1918.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 26, 1918, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a writ of prohibition. Respondent William S. Dyer brought an action against petitioner in the City Court of the city of New York to recover $2,500 for services alleged to have been rendered. The jury found a verdict for the full amount, whereupon the court directed the entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff for $2,000. The petitioner contended that the jurisdiction of the City Court being limited.to $2,000, the verdict was void and, therefore, the direction of judgment thereon was illegal and prayed for a writ of prohibition restraining the court and the said plaintiff from taking any further proceedings in reference thereto.

*Everett V.- Abbot*for appellant.

No appearance for, respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock,' Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON D C

FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT

Under Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED
September 30, 1995
Commission File: 0-3216

INVESTORS HERITAGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in Charter)

            KENTUCKY                                  61-0574893
(State of other jurisdiction                       (IRS Employer 
of incorporation or organization)                  Identification Number)

200 Capital Ave. P.O. Box 717 Frankfort KY 40602
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant's telephone number - (502) 223-2361

_________________________________________________________________

Securities registered pursuant to Section 13 (g) of the Act:

Common Capital Stock, par value $1.00 per share  (Title of Class)

Number of outstanding shares as of September 30, 1995 -  898,485
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES_X_   NO____

                          PART II  -  OTHER INFORMATION



ITEM 6.   Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
 

(b)  There were no reports filed on Form 8-K during the quarter ended September
30, 1995.

(c)  Exhibit 27 - Financial Data Schedule.



                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

INVESTORS HERITAGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY


November 14, 1995                                \s\
DATE                                            BY:  Harry Lee Waterfield II
                                                     President

November 14, 1995                                \s\
DATE                                            BY: Jimmy R. McIver,
                                                    Treasurer
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Alejandro Andujar, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appellate Advocates, Benjamin S. Litman, Esq., for appellant.District Attorney Queens County, Nancy Fitzpatrick Talcott, Esq., for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Dorothy Chin Brandt, J.), rendered November 6, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the third degree. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.</p><p>We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to <i>Anders v California </i>(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (<i>see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.]</i>, 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; <i>People v Paige</i>, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; <i>cf. People v Gonzalez</i>, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).</p><p>Solomon, J.P, Pesce and Elliot, JJ., concur.</p><br><br>ENTER:<p>Paul Kenny</p><br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: April 12, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
#### STATE v. HUNSUCKER

No. 8 PC.

Case below: 3 N.C. App. 281.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 January 1969.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                                      
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: September 20, 2005 |  | /s/ Mark Buller                      
|                         |  | Mark Buller  Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 213 (Friday, November 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 67135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22087]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Resource Advisory Committee, Sundance, WY, USDA Forest 
Service

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Black Hills 
National Forests' Crook County Resource Advisory Committee will meet 
Monday, November 21, 2005 in Sundance, Wyoming for a business meeting. 
The meeting is open to the public.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The business meeting on November 21st will 
begin at 6:30 p.m., at the USFS Bearlodge Ranger District office, 121 
South 21st Street, Sundance, Wyoming. Agenda topics will include 
presentation of appointments to the Crook County Resource Advisory 
Committee, election of officers, review of previously funded projects 
and examination of new project proposals. A public forum will begin at 
8:30 p.m. (MT).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Kozel, Bearlodge District Ranger 
and Designated Federal Officer at (307) 283-1361.

    Dated: October 31, 2005.
Steven J. Kozel,
District Ranger, Bearlodge Ranger District.
[FR Doc. 05-22087 Filed 11-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Proclamation 7946 of October 14, 2005

# National Character Counts Week, 2005

During National Character Counts Week, we focus on ways to reach out to our fellow Americans, especially children. Parents are the first and best example of character in a child's life. By volunteering and performing other acts of service in their communities, parents can teach children about the good that comes from helping others. By extending a hand to those who suffer, parents can demonstrate kindness and compassion and help children learn the importance of serving a cause greater than themselves.

Our schools also play a vital part in providing children with the principles they need to grow and succeed. The Department of Education supports character education through its Partnerships in Character Education Program. During my Administration, over 60 State and local education agencies have received funding from the Department of Education to provide programs that teach important values to our youth.

Many citizens around the country are helping in the effort to teach character to children. One of the most important ways to contribute is to become a mentor. By showing love, support, and compassion, one person can make a difference in the life of a child.

During National Character Counts Week and throughout the year, I encourage children and all Americans to make good choices in life, set high standards, and serve as leaders. By working together, we can all contribute to a culture of good citizenship and responsibility that strengthens our Nation.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 16 through October 22, 2005, as National Character Counts Week. I call upon public officials, educators, librarians, parents, students, and all Americans to observe this week with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourteenth day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth.

[FR Doc. 05-21028 Billing code 3195-01-P