alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CITY OF LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, a Municipal Corporation, Appellant, v. CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, a Municipal Corporation, Respondent.

No. 9462

November 10, 1978

585 P.2d 1349

*Albright & McGimsey,*Las Vegas, for Appellant.

*John P. Fadgen,*City Attorney, North Las Vegas, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

In County of Clark v. City of North Las Vegas, 89 Nev. 10, 504 P.2d 1326 (1973), this court declared void an attempt by North Las Vegas to annex certain property. In Sunrise Manor v. City of North Las Vegas, 91 Nev. 713, 541 P.2d 1102(1975), this court determined that because *de facto*annexation had occurred, North Las Vegas could nevertheless retain tax revenues derived before we declared the annexation void.

In our view, the latter holding controls this case. Although appellant City of Las Vegas here argues that it was not technically a party, when we made our determination of *de facto*annexation, and therefore was not bound by it, we do not believe the facts appellant now offers to prove would or should alter our prior ruling in any event.

*706Accordingly, the district court’s order granting summary judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5604 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5604

   To rescind amounts authorized for certain surface transportation 
                               programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2010

 Mr. Perriello (for himself and Mr. Schauer) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To rescind amounts authorized for certain surface transportation 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Surface Transportation Savings Act 
of 2010''.

SEC. 2. SAFETY BELT PERFORMANCE GRANTS.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b), of the amounts 
authorized for fiscal year 2010 by section 2001(a)(4) of SAFETEA-LU 
(119 Stat. 1519) to carry out section 406 of title 23, United States 
Code, $80,994,029 is rescinded.
    (b) Limitation.--The amount rescinded pursuant to subsection (a) 
shall be decreased as necessary to ensure that not less than 
$28,505,971 is available for fiscal year 2010 to carry out section 406 
of title 23, United States Code.

SEC. 3. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.

    Of the amounts authorized for fiscal year 2010 by section 
2001(a)(11) of SAFETEA-LU (119 Stat. 1520), $6,547,000 is rescinded.

SEC. 4. NATIONAL DRIVER REGISTER.

    Of the amounts authorized for fiscal year 2010 by section 
2001(a)(7) of SAFETEA-LU (119 Stat. 1520) for the National Driver 
Register authorized under chapter 303 of title 49, United States Code, 
$78,000 is rescinded.

SEC. 5. NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION OPERATIONS AND 
              RESEARCH.

    Of the amounts authorized for fiscal year 2010 by section 
2001(a)(2) of SAFETEA-LU (119 Stat. 1519) to carry out section 403 of 
title 23, United States Code, $1,829,000 is rescinded.

SEC. 6. TRANSIT FORMULA AND BUS GRANTS.

    Of the amounts authorized for fiscal year 2010 by section 
5338(b)(1) of title 49, United States Code, to carry out sections 5305, 
5307, 5308, 5309, 5310, 5311, 5316, 5317, 5320, 5335, 5339, and 5340 of 
title 49, United States Code, and section 3038 of the Federal Transit 
Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 392), $17,394,000 is rescinded.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2007033EN.01000301.xml

| 7.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 33/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 33/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 112/2007

of 6 February 2007

establishing that certain limits for issuing import licences for sugar products under tariff quotas and preferential agreements are no longer reached

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 950/2006 of 28 June 2006 laying down detailed rules of application for the 2006/07, 2007/08 and 2008/09 marketing years for the import and refining of sugar products under certain tariff quotas and preferential agreements (2), and in particular Article 5(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The records referred to in Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 950/2006 show that quantities of sugar are still available for the delivery obligations for preferential sugar laid down under Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 950/2006 for India and Zimbabwe bearing the serial number 09.4337 and 09.4351. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The records referred to in Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 950/2006 show that quantities of sugar are still available for the delivery obligations for preferential sugar laid down under Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 950/2006 for India and Zimbabwe bearing the serial number 09.4337 and 09.4351.

| (2) | Under these circumstances, the Commission must indicate that the limits concerned are no longer reached, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Under these circumstances, the Commission must indicate that the limits concerned are no longer reached,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The limits for the delivery obligations for preferential sugar originating in India and Zimbabwe bearing the serial number 09.4337 and 09.4351 for the 2006-2007 delivery periods are no longer reached.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 February 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2011/2006 (OJ L 384, 29.12.2006, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 178, 1.7.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2031/2006 (OJ L 414, 30.12.2006, p. 43).

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q of  American  Express
Certificate  Company (the  "Company")  for the  quarterly  period ended June 30,
2004, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  Paula R. Meyer,  as Chief Executive  Officer of the Company and
Brian J.  McGrane,  as Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  each  hereby
certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d)
              of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



    /s/ Paula R. Meyer
    ---------------------
Name:   Paula R. Meyer
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
Date:   August 11, 2004




    /s/ Brian J. McGrane
    -----------------------
Name:   Brian J. McGrane
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Date:   August 11, 2004


The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002,  and is not  being  "filed"  as part  of the  Form  10-Q or as a  separate
disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange  Act"), or otherwise  subject to liability under
that  section.  This  certification  shall not be deemed to be  incorporated  by
reference into any filing under the  Securities Act of 1933, as amended,  or the
Exchange  Act except to the  extent  that this  Exhibit  32.1 is  expressly  and
specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 4.1**

 

 

 

 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

 

INTERSTATE POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY

(formerly known as IES Utilities Inc.,

formerly known as Iowa Electric Light and Power Company)

TO

 

J.P. MORGAN TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

 

as Successor Trustee

 

__________________________

 

Sixth Supplemental Indenture

 

Dated as of June 9, 2005

 

__________________________

 

TO

 

INDENTURE OF MORTGAGE and DEED OF TRUST

 

Dated as of September 1, 1993

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________

 

SIXTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE, dated as of June 9, 2005 (the “Sixth Supplemental Indenture”), made by and between INTERSTATE POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY (formerly known as IES Utilities Inc., formerly known as Iowa Electric Light and Power Company), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Iowa (the “Company”), and J.P. MORGAN TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America (the “Trustee”), as Trustee under the Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust dated as of September 1, 1993, hereinafter mentioned.

----
Exhibit 21

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF INTER-TEL, INCORPORATED

       Listed below are all the subsidiaries of Inter-Tel, Incorporated, as well
as the  jurisdiction  under  the  laws of  which  each  was  organized,  and the
percentage  of  the  outstanding  voting  stock  of  each  owned  by  Inter-Tel,
Incorporated.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            PERCENTAGE             STATE OR
                                                                             OF VOTING           JURISDICTION
NAME                                                                        STOCK OWNED         OF ORGANIZATION
----                                                                        -----------         ---------------
<S>                                                                         <C>                 <C>
Inter-Tel Integrated Systems, Inc.                                              100%                Arizona
Inter-Tel Technologies, Inc.                                                    100%                Arizona
Inter-Tel Leasing, Inc.                                                         100%                Arizona
Inter-Tel Software and Services, Inc.                                           100%                Arizona
Inter-Tel Midwest, Inc.                                                         100%                Delaware
Inter-Tel Incorporated-New Jersey                                               100%                Delaware
Inter-Tel NetSolutions, Inc.                                                    100%                Texas
Inter-Tel DataCom, Inc.                                                         100%                Delaware
Southwest Telephone Systems, Inc.                                               100%                New Mexico
American Telcom Corp. of Georgia, Inc.                                          100%                Georgia
Access West, Inc.                                                               100%                Delaware
Inter-Tel Integrated Systems (UK), Ltd.                                         100%                United Kingdom
Swan Solutions Limited                                                          100%                United Kingdom
Inter-Tel Japan, Inc.                                                           100%                Japan
Tri-Com Communications, Inc.                                                    100%                North Carolina
Florida Telephone Systems, Inc.                                                 100%                Florida
NTL Corporation dba ComNet of Ohio                                              100%                Ohio
Integrated Telecom Services Corporation                                         100%                Kentucky
Telephone Corporation of America, Inc. (Telcoa)                                 100%                Maryland
TDI Services Corporation, Technology Dynamics for the 21st Century              100%                Virginia
Executone Inter-Tel Business Information Systems, Inc.                          100%                Arizona
</TABLE>
IB 

Union Calendar No. 311 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5604 

[Report No. 111–546] 

To rescind amounts authorized for certain surface transportation programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2010 

Mr. PERRIELLO (for himself and Mr. SCHAUER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

JULY 15, 2010 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5604 RH

A BILL 

To rescind amounts authorized for certain surface 

transportation programs. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5604 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Surface Transpor5 tation Savings Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SAFETY BELT PERFORMANCE GRANTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), of the 

8 amounts authorized for fiscal year 2010 by section 

9 2001(a)(4) of SAFETEA–LU (119 Stat. 1519) to carry 

10 out section 406 of title 23, United States Code, 

11 $80,994,029 is rescinded. 

12 (b) LIMITATION.—The amount rescinded pursuant to 

13 subsection (a) shall be decreased as necessary to ensure 

14 that not less than $28,505,971 is available for fiscal year 

15 2010 to carry out section 406 of title 23, United States 

16 Code. 

17 SEC. 3. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. 

18 Of the amounts authorized for fiscal year 2010 by 

19 section 2001(a)(11) of SAFETEA–LU (119 Stat. 1520), 

20 $6,547,000 is rescinded. 

21 SEC. 4. NATIONAL DRIVER REGISTER. 

22 Of the amounts authorized for fiscal year 2010 by 

23 section 2001(a)(7) of SAFETEA–LU (119 Stat. 1520) 

24 for the National Driver Register authorized under chapter 

25 303 of title 49, United States Code, $78,000 is rescinded. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 5604 RH

1 SEC. 5. NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRA2 TION OPERATIONS AND RESEARCH. 

3 Of the amounts authorized for fiscal year 2010 by 

4 section 2001(a)(2) of SAFETEA–LU (119 Stat. 1519) to 

5 carry out section 403 of title 23, United States Code, 

6 $1,829,000 is rescinded. 

7 SEC. 6. TRANSIT FORMULA AND BUS GRANTS. 

8 Of the amounts authorized for fiscal year 2010 by 

9 section 5338(b)(1) of title 49, United States Code, to 

10 carry out sections 5305, 5307, 5308, 5309, 5310, 5311, 

11 5316, 5317, 5320, 5335, 5339, and 5340 of title 49, 

12 United States Code, and section 3038 of the Federal 

13 Transit Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 392), $17,394,000 is re14 scinded. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 311 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5604 

[Report No. 111–546] 

A BILL 

To rescind amounts authorized for certain surface 

transportation programs. 

JULY 15, 2010 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
# C_2008032EN.01000701.xml

| 6.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4804 — Serafina/Intelsat)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 32/02)

On 19 October 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4804. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4804. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

A.K., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, BLOOMINGTON 

POSTAL SERVICE, Bloomington, IL, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket Nos. 22-0923 &

21-0278

Issued: February 13, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL IN DOCKET NO. 22-0923 AND

DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION IN

DOCKET NO. 21-0278

Before:

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On May 23, 2022 appellant sought an appeal from a purported July 12, 2021 decision of 

the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 22-0923. 

The Board, having duly considered the matter, notes that its jurisdiction is limited to the 

review of final adverse OWCP decisions issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act 

(FECA).1 This jurisdiction encompasses any final decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of 

the date appellant filed her appeal.2 The July 12, 2021 decision was a Board decision assigned 

Docket No. 21-0278, which affirmed a November 2, 2020 OWCP decision.3 As there is no final 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2 20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the 

date of issuance of a decision of OWCP.”

3 Docket No. 21-0278 (issued July 12, 2021).
adverse decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the filing of this appeal,

4 over which the 

Board may properly exercise jurisdiction, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 

22-0923 must be dismissed. 

To the extent that appellant’s May 23, 2022 appeal may be construed as a timely petition 

for reconsideration of the Board’s July 12, 2021 decision in Docket No. 21-0278, the Board notes 

that its decision became final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of issuance.5 As 

appellant did not file her disagreement with the Board’s July 12, 2021 decision until May 23, 2022, 

this submission may not be deemed as a timely petition for reconsideration as it was filed in excess 

of 30 days from the date of issuance.6 Thus, the petition for reconsideration of the July 12, 2021

Board decision must be dismissed as untimely filed. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 22-0923 is dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the petition for reconsideration in Docket No. 

21-0278 is dismissed as untimely filed.7

Issued: February 13, 2023

Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

4 Supra note 2.

5 20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d).

6 See id. at § 501.7(a).

7 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” 20 

C.F.R. § 501.6(d).
Current Status of the American Rescue Plan

Emergency Paid Leave

This message is intended for all DOL Federal Employees.

Dear Colleagues,

This is to advise you of the current status of the emergency paid leave that was created under the American Rescue Plan

(ARP) Act of 2021, that was signed into law on March 11, 2021. The legislation provides an additional category of leave

for Federal employees experiencing specific COVID-19 related impact. The Department is waiting for guidance from

OPM with instructions for implementation of this leave before it can be made available for use. In the meantime, existing

leave categories and workplace flexibilities remain available for employees to use as appropriate for time needed off from

work. Leave corrections can be made retroactive to March 11, 2021, after internal procedures for emergency paid leave

are established.

OASAM will provide additional information and guidance to everyone as soon as this information becomes available.

Thank you for your patience and cooperation.

Sincerely,

Sydney T. Rose | Chief Human Capital Officer

Last updated: March 22, 2021

LABORNET