67448 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 214 / Monday, November 7, 2005 / Notices 

Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset 

Reviews of the Antidumping Duty 

Orders on Stainless Steel Wire Rods 

from Brazil, France, and India; Final 

Results, from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD 

Operations to Joseph A. Spetrini, Acting 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, dated October 31, 2005 

(Decision Memo), which is hereby 

adopted by this notice. The issues 

discussed in the Decision Memo include 

the likelihood of continuation or 

recurrence of dumping and the 

magnitude of the margins likely to 

prevail if the orders were revoked. 

Parties can find a complete discussion 

of all issues raised in these sunset 

reviews and the corresponding 

recommendations in this public memo, 

which is on file in room B–099 of the 

main Commerce Building. 

In addition, a complete version of the 

Decision Memo can be accessed directly 

on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/ 

. The paper copy and electronic version 

of the Decision Memo are identical in 

content. 

Final Results of Reviews 

We determine that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on stainless 

steel wire rods from Brazil would likely 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping at the following weighted–

average percentage margins. 

Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers Weighted–Average 

Margins 

Acos Finos Piratini SA .. 26.50 percent 

Acos Villares SA ........... 26.50 percent 

Electrometal - Metals 

Especiais S.A. ........... 24.63 percent 

All Others ...................... 25.88 percent 

We determine that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on stainless 

steel wire rods from France would likely 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping at the following weighted–

average percentage margins: 

Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers Weighted–Average 

Margins 

Imphy ............................ 24.51 percent 

Ugine–Savoie ............... 24.51 percent 

All Others ...................... 24.51 percent 

We determine that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on stainless 

steel wire rods from India would likely 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping at the following weighted–

average percentage margins: 

Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers Weighted–Average 

Margins 

Mukand Ltd. .................. 48.80 percent 

Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers Weighted–Average 

Margins 

Sunstar Metals Ltd. ...... 48.80 percent 

Grand Foundry Ltd. ...... 48.80 percent 

All Others ...................... 48.80 percent 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective orders (APO) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing the 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: October 31, 2005. 

Joseph A. Spetrini, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 05–22140 Filed 11–4–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(A–588–854) 

Certain Tin Mill Products from Japan; 

Final Results of the Expedited Sunset 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 1, 2005, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated the sunset review 

of the antidumping duty order on 

certain tin mill products from Japan, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). On 

the basis of a notice of intent to 

participate and adequate substantive 

responses filed on behalf of domestic 

interested parties and no response from 

respondent interested parties, the 

Department conducted an expedited 

(120–day) sunset review. As a result of 

this sunset review, the Department finds 

that revocation of the antidumping duty 

order would likely lead to the 

continuation or recurrence of dumping. 

The dumping margins are identified in 

the Final Results of Review section of 

this notice. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 7, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dana Mermelstein, Office 6, and Dena 

Aliadinov, Office 7, AD/CVD 

Operations, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 

482–1391 and (202) 482–3362, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 1, 2005, the Department 

initiated a sunset review of the 

antidumping duty order on tin mill 

products from Japan pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act. See Initiation of Five–

year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 70 FR 38101 

(July 1, 2005). The Department received 

notices of intent to participate from two 

domestic interested parties, United 

States Steel Corporation (U.S. Steel) and 

Mittal Steel USA ISG Inc. (Mittal Steel) 

(collectively, domestic interested 

parties), within the deadline specified 

in section 351.218(d)(1)(i) of the 

Department’s regulations. Domestic 

interested parties claimed interested 

party status under section 771(9)(C) of 

the Act as U.S. producers of the 

domestic like product. We received 

complete substantive responses from the 

domestic interested parties within the 

30–day deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i). However, we did not 

receive any response from any 

respondent interested parties. As a 

result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department 

conducted expedited sunset reviews of 

these orders. 

Scope of the Order 

The scope of this order includes tin 

mill flat–rolled products that are coated 

or plated with tin, chromium or 

chromium oxides. Flat–rolled steel 

products coated with tin are known as 

tin plate. Flat–rolled steel products 

coated with chromium or chromium 

oxides are known as tin–free steel or 

electrolytic chromium–coated steel. The 

scope includes all the noted tin mill 

products regardless of thickness, width, 

form (in coils or cut sheets), coating 

type (electrolytic or otherwise), edge 

(trimmed, untrimmed or further 

processed, such as scroll cut), coating 

thickness, surface finish, temper, 

coating metal (tin, chromium, 

chromium oxide), reduction (single–or 

double–reduced), and whether or not 

coated with a plastic material. All 

products that meet the written physical 

description are within the scope of this 

order unless specifically excluded. The 

following products, by way of example, 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 214 / Monday, November 7, 2005 / Notices 67449 

are outside and/or specifically excluded 

from the scope of this order: 

– Single reduced electrolytically 

chromium coated steel with a 

thickness 0.238 mm (85 pound base 

box) (+/–10%) or 0.251 mm (90 

pound base box) (+/–10%) or 0.255 

mm (+/–10%) with 770 mm 

(minimum width) (+/–1.588 mm) by 

900 mm (maximum length if 

sheared) sheet size or 30.6875 

inches (minimum width) (+/–1/16 

inch) and 35.4 inches (maximum 

length if sheared) sheet size; with 

type MR or higher (per ASTM) 

A623 steel chemistry; batch 

annealed at T2 1/2 anneal temper, 

with a yield strength of 31 to 42 

kpsi (214 to 290 Mpa); with a 

tensile strength of 43 to 58 kpsi (296 

to 400 Mpa); with a chrome coating 

restricted to 32 to 150 mg/square 

meter; with a chrome oxide coating 

restricted to 6 to 25 mg/m with a 

modified 7B ground roll finish or 

blasted roll finish; with roughness 

average (Ra) 0.10 to 0.35 

micrometers, measured with a 

stylus instrument with a stylus 

radius of 2 to 5 microns, a trace 

length of 5.6 mm, and a cut–off of 

0.8 mm, and the measurement 

traces shall be made perpendicular 

to the rolling direction; with an oil 

level of 0.17 to 0.37 grams/base box 

as type BSO, or 2.5 to 5.5 mg/square 

meter as type DOS, or 3.5 to 6.5 mg/ 

square meter as type ATBC; with 

electrical conductivity of static 

probe voltage drop of 0.46 volts 

drop maximum, and with electrical 

conductivity degradation to 0.70 

volts drop maximum after stoving 

(heating to 400 degrees F for 100 

minutes followed by a cool to room 

temperature). 

– Single reduced electrolytically 

chromium– or tin–coated steel in 

the gauges of 0.0040 inch nominal, 

0.0045 inch nominal, 0.0050 inch 

nominal, 0.0061 inch nominal (55 

pound base box weight), 0.0066 

inch nominal (60 pound base box 

weight), and 0.0072 inch nominal 

(65 pound base box weight), 

regardless of width, temper, finish, 

coating or other properties. 

– Single reduced electrolytically 

chromium coated steel in the gauge 

of 0.024 inch, with widths of 27.0 

inches or 31.5 inches, and with T–

1 temper properties. 

– Single reduced electrolytically 

chromium coated steel, with a 

chemical composition of 0.005% 

max carbon, 0.030% max silicon, 

0.25% max manganese, 0.025% 

max phosphorous, 0.025% max 

sulfur, 0.070% max aluminum, and 

the balance iron, with a metallic 

chromium layer of 70–130 mg/ 

square meter, with a chromium 

oxide layer of 5–30 mg/square 

meter, with a tensile strength of 

260–440 N/square millimeter, with 

an elongation of 28–48%, with a 

hardness (HR–30T) of 40–58, with a 

surface roughness of 0.5–1.5 

microns Ra, with magnetic 

properties of Bm (kg) 10.0 

minimum, Br (kg) 8.0 minimum, Hc 

(Oe) 2.5–3.8, and Mu 1400 

minimum, as measured with a 

Riken Denshi DC magnetic 

characteristic measuring machine, 

Model BHU–60. 

– Bright finish tin–coated sheet with 

a thickness equal to or exceeding 

0.0299 inch, coated to thickness of 

3/4 pound (0.000045 inch) and 1 

pound (0.00006 inch). 

– Electrolytically chromium coated 

steel having ultra flat shape defined 

as oil can maximum depth of 5/64 

inch (2.0 mm) and edge wave 

maximum of 5/64 inch (2.0 mm) 

and no wave to penetrate more than 

2.0 inches (51.0 mm) from the strip 

edge and coilset or curling 

requirements of average maximum 

of 5/64 inch (2.0 mm) (based on six 

readings, three across each cut edge 

of a 24 inches (61 cm) long sample 

with no single reading exceeding 4/ 

32 inch (3.2 mm) and no more than 

two readings at 4/32 inch (3.2 mm)) 

and (for 85 pound base box item 

only: crossbuckle maximums of 

0.001 inch (0.0025 mm) average 

having no reading above 0.005 inch 

(0.127 mm)), with a camber 

maximum of 1/4 inch (6.3 mm) per 

20 feet (6.1 meters), capable of 

being bent 120 degrees on a 0.002 

inch radius without cracking, with 

a chromium coating weight of 

metallic chromium at 100 mg/ 

square meter and chromium oxide 

of 10 mg/square meter, with a 

chemistry of 0.13% maximum 

carbon, 0.60% maximum 

manganese, 0.15% maximum 

silicon, 0.20% maximum copper, 

0.04% maximum phosphorous, 

0.05% maximum sulfur, and 0.20% 

maximum aluminum, with a 

surface finish of Stone Finish 7C, 

with a DOS–A oil at an aim level of 

2 mg/square meter, with not more 

than 15 inclusions/foreign matter in 

15 feet (4.6 meters) (with inclusions 

not to exceed 1/32 inch (0.8 mm) in 

width and 3/64 inch (1.2 mm) in 

length), with thickness/temper 

combinations of either 60 pound 

base box (0.0066 inch) double 

reduced CADR8 temper in widths 

of 25.00 inches, 27.00 inches, 27.50 

inches, 28.00 inches, 28.25 inches, 

28.50 inches, 29.50 inches, 29.75 

inches, 30.25 inches, 31.00 inches, 

32.75 inches, 33.75 inches, 35.75 

inches, 36.25 inches, 39.00 inches, 

or 43.00 inches, or 85 pound base 

box (0.0094 inch) single reduced 

CAT4 temper in widths of 25.00 

inches, 27.00 inches, 28.00 inches, 

30.00 inches, 33.00 inches, 33.75 

inches, 35.75 inches, 36.25 inches, 

or 43.00 inches, with width 

tolerance of +/–1/8 inch, with a 

thickness tolerance of +/–0.0005 

inch, with a maximum coil weight 

of 20,000 pounds (9071.0 kg), with 

a minimum coil weight of 18,000 

pounds (8164.8 kg) with a coil 

inside diameter of 16 inches (40.64 

cm) with a steel core, with a coil 

maximum outside diameter of 59.5 

inches (151.13 cm), with a 

maximum of one weld (identified 

with a paper flag) per coil, with a 

surface free of scratches, holes, and 

rust. 

– Electrolytically tin coated steel 

having differential coating with 

1.00 pound/base box equivalent on 

the heavy side, with varied coating 

equivalents in the lighter side 

(detailed below), with a continuous 

cast steel chemistry of type MR, 

with a surface finish of type 7B or 

7C, with a surface passivation of 0.7 

mg/square foot of chromium 

applied as a cathodic dichromate 

treatment, with coil form having 

restricted oil film weights of 0.3–0.4 

grams/base box of type DOS–A oil, 

coil inside diameter ranging from 

15.5 to 17 inches, coil outside 

diameter of a maximum 64 inches, 

with a maximum coil weight of 

25,000 pounds, and with temper/ 

coating/dimension combinations of: 

1) CAT 4 temper, 1.00/.050 pound/ 

base box coating, 70 pound/base 

box (0.0077 inch) thickness, and 

33.1875 inch ordered width; or 2) 

CAT5 temper, 1.00/0.50 pound/base 

box coating, 75 pound/base box 

(0.0082 inch) thickness, and 

34.9375 inch or 34.1875 inch 

ordered width; or 3) CAT5 temper, 

1.00/0.50 pound/base box coating, 

107 pound/base box (0.0118 inch) 

thickness, and 30.5625 inch or 

35.5625 inch ordered width; or 4) 

CADR8 temper, 1.00/0.50 pound/ 

base box coating, 85 pound/base 

box (0.0093 inch) thickness, and 

35.5625 inch ordered width; or 5) 

CADR8 temper, 1.00/0.25 pound/ 

base box coating, 60 pound/base 

box (0.0066 inch) thickness, and 

35.9375 inch ordered width; or 6) 

CADR8 temper, 1.00/0.25 pound/ 

67450 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 214 / Monday, November 7, 2005 / Notices 

base box coating, 70 pound/base 

box (0.0077 inch) thickness, and 

32.9375 inch, 33.125 inch, or 

35.1875 inch ordered width. 

– Electrolytically tin coated steel 

having differential coating with 

1.00 pound/base box equivalent on 

the heavy side, with varied coating 

equivalents on the lighter side 

(detailed below), with a continuous 

cast steel chemistry of type MR, 

with a surface finish of type 7B or 

7C, with a surface passivation of 0.5 

mg/square foot of chromium 

applied as a cathodic dichromate 

treatment, with ultra flat scroll cut 

sheet form, with CAT 5 temper with 

1.00/0.10 pound/base box coating, 

with a lithograph logo printed in a 

uniform pattern on the 0.10 pound 

coating side with a clear protective 

coat, with both sides waxed to a 

level of 15–20 mg/216 sq. in., with 

ordered dimension combinations of 

1) 75 pound/base box (0.0082 inch) 

thickness and 34.9375 inch x 

31.748 inch scroll cut dimensions; 

or 2) 75 pound/base box (0.0082 

inch) thickness and 34.1875 inch x 

29.076 inch scroll cut dimensions; 

or 3) 107 pound/base box (0.0118 

inch) thickness and 30.5625 inch x 

34.125 inch scroll cut dimension. 

– Tin–free steel coated with a metallic 

chromium layer between 100–200 

mg/square meter and a chromium 

oxide layer between 5–30 mg/ 

square meter; chemical composition 

of 0.05% maximum carbon, 0.03% 

maximum silicon, 0.60% maximum 

manganese, 0.02% 

maximum phosphorous, and 0.02% 

maximum sulfur; magnetic flux 

density (‘‘Br’’) of 10 kg minimum 

and a coercive force (‘‘Hc’’) of 3.8 

Oe minimum. 

– Tin–free steel laminated on one or 

both sides of the surface with a 

polyester film, consisting of two 

layers (an amorphous layer and an 

outer crystal layer), that contains no 

more than the indicated amounts of 

the following environmental 

hormones: 1 mg/kg BADGE 

(BisPhenol A Di–glycidyl Ether), 1 

mg/kg BFDGE (BisPhenol F Di–

glycidyl Ether), and 3 mg/kg BPA 

(BisPhenol A). 

The merchandise subject to this order 

is classified in the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States 

(‘‘HTSUS’’), under HTSUS subheadings 

7210.11.0000, 7210.12.0000, 

7210.50.0000, 7212.10.0000, and 

7212.50.0000 if of non–alloy steel and 

under HTSUS subheadings 

7225.99.0090, and 7226.99.0000 if of 

alloy steel. Although the subheadings 

are provided for convenience and 

customs purposes, our written 

description of the scope of this order is 

dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this sunset review 

are addressed in the ‘‘Issues and 

Decision Memorandum’’ from Stephen 

J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Import Administration, to Joseph A. 

Spetrini, Acting Assistant Secretary for 

Import Administration, dated October 

31, 2005, (‘‘Decision Memorandum’’), 

which is hereby adopted by this notice. 

The issues discussed in the Decision 

Memorandum include the likelihood of 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and the magnitude of the margin likely 

to prevail if the order were revoked. 

Parties can find a complete discussion 

of all issues raised in this sunset review 

and the corresponding 

recommendations in this public 

memorandum, which is on file in room 

B–099 of the main Department building. 

In addition, a complete version of the 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the Web at http:// 

ia.ita.doc.gov/frn, under the heading 

‘‘November 2005.’’ The paper copy and 

electronic version of the Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Results of Review 

We determine that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on tin mill 

products from Japan would likely lead 

to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping at the following percentage 

weighted–average margins: 

Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers Weighted–Average 

Margin (Percent) 

Nippon Steel Corporation ............................ 95.29 

Kawasaki Steel Corporation ..................... 95.29 

NKK Corporation .......... 95.29 

Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. ... 95.29 

All Other Japanese 

Manufacturers and 

Exporters ................... 32.52 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective orders (APO) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with section 351.305 of the 

Department’s regulations. Timely 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation which is subject to sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing the 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: October 31, 2005. 

Joseph A. Spetrini, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 05–22141 Filed 11–4–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Applications for Duty–Free Entry of 

Scientific Instruments 

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 

Educational, Scientific and Cultural 

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. 

L. 89–651; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 

301), we invite comments on the 

question of whether an instrument of 

equivalent scientific value, for the 

purposes for which the instrument 

shown below is intended to be used, is 

being manufactured in the United 

States. 

Comments must comply with 15 CFR 

301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and 

be filed within 20 days with the 

Statutory Import Programs Staff, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, Washington, 

D.C. 20230. Applications may be 

examined between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 

P.M. in Suite 4100W, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, Franklin Court Building, 

1099 14th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 

Docket Number: 05–041. Applicant: 

Georgia Institute of Technology, 711 

Marietta St., Atlanta, GA 30332. 

Instrument: Dual Beam SEM/FIB 

Electron Microscope System, Model 

Quanta 200 3D Nanolab. Manufacturer: 

FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended 

Use: The instrument is intended to be 

used to improve understanding of 

molecular mechanisms and functional 

assemblies, initiate development of new 

materials, and facilitate advances in 

environmental analysis and detection. 

New research and creative concepts will 

include: (1) multifunctional scanning 

nanoprobes and quantum cascade laser–

based sensing systems,(2) stimulated 

surface chemistry using metal–

insulator-metal (MIM) devices 

containing nano–scale field emission 

arrays,(3) optically gated single 

molecule transistors,(4) shape–

preserving chemical conversion of 3–D 

bioclastic structures,(5) impedance 

mapping AFM cantilever arrays and (6) 

nanobelts as nanobiosensors and 

nanocantilevers. Application accepted 

by Commissioner of Customs: 

September 15, 2005.