alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

B.M., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, BEDFORD PARK 

POST OFFICE, Bedford Park, IL, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0242

Issued: February 2, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On December 7, 2022 appellant filed an appeal from a March 10, 2022 nonmerit decision

of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 23-0242.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act.1 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance 

of OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the March 10, 2022 decision was September 6, 2022. As 

appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until December 7, 2022, more than 180 days after 

the March 10, 2022 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 23-0242 is 

untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not 

explained her failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2 20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e).
2

establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP 

within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed 

as No. 23-0242, must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-0242 is dismissed.

Issued: February 2, 2023

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id.

at § 501.6(d).
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5550 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to include a definition of ‘‘loss 

of use’’ for purposes of evaluating disabilities and providing adapted 

housing and automobiles under the laws administered by the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2010 

Mrs. KIRKPATRICK of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to include a definition of ‘‘loss of use’’ for purposes of evaluating disabilities and providing adapted housing and automobiles 

under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF ‘‘LOSS OF USE’’ FOR PURPOSES 

4 OF LAWS ADMINISTERED BY THE SECRETARY 

5 OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

6 Section 1101 of title 38, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5550 IH

1 ‘‘(5) The term ‘loss of use’ with respect to an 

2 extremity means a condition in which no effective 

3 function of the extremity remains based on the ex4 tent and pattern of nerve or other impairment that 

5 directly affects— 

6 ‘‘(A) in the case of a hand, the acts of 

7 grasping, and manipulation; 

8 ‘‘(B) in the case of a foot, balance and 

9 propulsion; or 

10 ‘‘(C) in the case of any other extremity, 

11 the basic acts associated with use of the ex12 tremity.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>


                                                      Exhibit 21
                              The Advest Group, Inc.

                               List of Subsidiaries

                                                           Present
                                                           Jurisdiction
Name                                Where Incorporated     Ownership
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Advest, Inc.                        Delaware                  100%
    Advest Insurance Agency         Massachusetts             100%
    Balanced Capital Services, Inc. Connecticut               100%

Advest Bank and Trust Company       Connecticut               100%

Advest Capital, Inc.                Connecticut               100%

Advest Properties, Inc.             Delaware                  100%

Advest Transfer Services, Inc.      Delaware                  100%

A.B. Realty Corp.                   Connecticut               100%

Bank Street Management Company      Connecticut               100%

Billings & Company, Inc.            Connecticut               100%
    Billings Management Co.         Connecticut               100%

Boston Advisors, Inc.               Massachusetts             100%

Vercoe Insurance Agency, Inc.       Ohio                      100%

                                   107
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the
undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in
the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                                                  
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Leigh Ginter                                                 
|                        |  | Leigh Ginter  Chief Financial Officer (Chief Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings,
L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2007026DE.01000801.xml

| 2.2.2007 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 26/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2007

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 26/8

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1984/2006 der Kommission vom 20. Dezember 2006 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2535/2001 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zur Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1255/1999 des Rates zur Einfuhrregelung für Milch und Milcherzeugnisse und zur Eröffnung der betreffenden Zollkontingente

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 387 vom 29. Dezember 2006
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 387 vom 29. Dezember 2006

Seite 4, Artikel 1 Punkt 7 Buchstabe a:

anstatt:

| „a) | Absatz 1 wird wie folgt ersetzt:
  „(1)   Die Lizenz wird von den zuständigen Behörden des Mitgliedstaats innerhalb von fünf Arbeitstagen vom fünften Tag nach dem Meldungstag gemäß Artikel 15 ab gerechnet erteilt.“ “, |
| --- | --- |

„a)

Absatz 1 wird wie folgt ersetzt:

„(1)   Die Lizenz wird von den zuständigen Behörden des Mitgliedstaats innerhalb von fünf Arbeitstagen vom fünften Tag nach dem Meldungstag gemäß Artikel 15 ab gerechnet erteilt.“ “,

muss es heißen:

| „a) | Absatz 1 wird wie folgt ersetzt:
  „(1)   Die Lizenz wird von den zuständigen Behörden des Mitgliedstaats innerhalb von fünf Arbeitstagen nach dem fünften Arbeitstag nach dem Meldungstag gemäß Artikel 15 erteilt.“ “. |
| --- | --- |

„a)

Absatz 1 wird wie folgt ersetzt:

„(1)   Die Lizenz wird von den zuständigen Behörden des Mitgliedstaats innerhalb von fünf Arbeitstagen nach dem fünften Arbeitstag nach dem Meldungstag gemäß Artikel 15 erteilt.“ “.

---
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

J.G., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, 

U.S. COAST GUARD INVESTIGATIVE 

SERVICE, Washington, DC, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0973

Issued: July 26, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On June 8, 2021 appellant filed an appeal from a December 3, 2020 merit decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP).1 The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 21-0973.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.2 

For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review 

authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s 

decision.3

The 180th day following the December 3, 2020 decision was June 1, 2021. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until June 8, 2021, more than 180 days after the December 3,

 

1 The Board notes that appellant’s AB-1 Form notes that he is requesting an appeal from a June 2, 2021 decision. 

There is no final adverse decision of that date contained in the case record. The last OWCP decision of record is dated 

December 3, 2020. 

2 5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

3

Id. at § 501.3(e).
2

2020 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 21-0973 is untimely filed. 

The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not offered a reason to 

explain the failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to establish 

compelling circumstances.

The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date 

of their issuance.”

4

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0973 is dismissed.

Issued: July 26, 2021

Washington, DC

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

 

4

Id. at § 501.6(d).
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

S.M., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, NORTHWEST 

DALLAS POST OFFICE, Dallas, TX, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket Nos. 22-0468 &

21-0449

Issued: September 26, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL IN DOCKET NO. 22-0468

AND DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION IN DOCKET 

NO. 21-0449

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On February 9, 2022 appellant sought an appeal from a purported October 25, 2021 

decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate 

Boards assigned Docket No. 22-0468.

The Board, having duly considered the matter, notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’Compensation Act.1 

This jurisdiction encompasses any final decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the date 

appellant filed his appeal.2 The case record as transmitted to the Board does not contain an

October 25, 2021 decision of OWCP, nor does it contain any other final adverse decision of OWCP 

issued within 180 days from the date of docketing of the current appeal.

3

 As there is no final 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the date of 

issuance of a decision of the OWCP.”

3

Id.
2

adverse decision issued by OWCP over which the Board may properly exercise jurisdiction, the 

Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 22-0468 must be dismissed.

4

 

To the extent that appellant’s February 9, 2022 appeal may be construed as a petition for 

reconsideration of the Board’s October 25, 2021 decision in Docket No. 21-0449, the Board notes 

that its decision became final 30 days after its issuance.5 Further, as appellant did not file his 

disagreement with the Board’s October 25, 2021 decision until February 9, 2022, this submission 

may not be deemed a timely petition for reconsideration as it was filed in excess of 30 days from 

the date of issuance.6 Thus, the petition for reconsideration of the October 25, 2021 Board decision 

must be dismissed as untimely filed. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as Docket No. 22-0468 is 

dismissed.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the petition for reconsideration docketed as Docket 

No. 21-0449 is dismissed.

Issued: September 26, 2022

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

4 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” 20 

C.F.R. § 501.6(d).

5

Id.

6

See id. at § 501.7(a).
# C_2008178EN.01000701.xml

| 15.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5099 — Arrow Electronics/Logix)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 178/08)

On 19 May 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5099. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5099. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
# L_2007175EN.01003901.xml

| 5.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 175/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 175/39

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 743/2007 of 28 June 2007 fixing the export refunds on white and raw sugar exported without further processing

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 169 of 29 June 2007
  )

On page 32, in the Annex, NB:

NB

Destination code S00 should read as follows:

| ‘S00 | : | all destinations except Albania, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro, Kosovo, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Andorra, Gibraltar, Ceuta, Melilla, Holy See (Vatican City), Liechtenstein, Communes of Livigno and Campione d’Italia, Heligoland, Greenland, Faeroe Islands and the areas of the Republic of Cyprus in which the Government of the Republic of Cyprus does not exercise effective control.’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘S00

:

all destinations except Albania, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro, Kosovo, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Andorra, Gibraltar, Ceuta, Melilla, Holy See (Vatican City), Liechtenstein, Communes of Livigno and Campione d’Italia, Heligoland, Greenland, Faeroe Islands and the areas of the Republic of Cyprus in which the Government of the Republic of Cyprus does not exercise effective control.’

---
RELEASE OF JUDGMENT


STATE OF TEXAS      )
                    )    KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
COUNTY OF POTTER    )


     WHEREAS, on the 16th day of June 1993 in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Amarillo
Division, in a cause styled "Natural Gas Pipeline Company of
American vs. Lyric Energy, et al.," Civil Action No.
CA-2-89-0168, Plaintiff, Natural Gas Pipeline of America,
recovered a judgment against Defendant, Lyric Energy, Inc.,
together with costs of suit and post judgment interest based upon
28 USC, 1961; and

     WHEREAS, such judgment was assigned by Natural Gas Pipeline
Company of America to Dynamic Investing, Inc., a Delaware
corporation; and

     WHEREAS, such judgment against Defendant, Lyric Energy,
Inc., has been compromised and settled with Dynamic Investing,
Inc., the party entitled to payment thereof.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned hereby acknowledges the
satisfaction of such judgment against Lyric Energy, Inc., and its
successors and assigns from (i) all liabilities and obligations
arising from and in connection with such judgment and (ii) all
liens existing by reason of such judgment upon any property of
Defendant, Lyric Energy, Inc., whatsoever.

     WITNESS my hand this 31st day of December, 1996.


                              DYNAMIC INVESTING, INC.,
                              a Delaware corporation


                              By:  /s/ G.E. Stahl
                                   G.E. Stahl, President


     This instrument was acknowledged before me on the 31st day
of December, 1996, by G.E. Stahl, President of Dynamic Investing,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, on behalf of said corporation.


                              /s/ Kathy Plautz
                              Notary Public, State of Texas

My commission expires:  3/21/2000
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5569 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2010 

Received 

AN ACT 

To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until 

September 30, 2010. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5569 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Flood Insur3 ance Program Extension Act of 2010’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PRO5 GRAM. 

6 (a) PROGRAM EXTENSION.—Section 1319 of the Na7 tional Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2008’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘September 30, 2010’’. 

10 (b) FINANCING.—Section 1309(a) of such Act (42 

11 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended— 

12 (1) by striking ‘‘September 30, 2008’’ and in13 serting ‘‘September 30, 2010’’; and 

14 (2) by striking ‘‘$20,775,000,000’’ and insert15 ing ‘‘$20,725,000,000’’. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 subsections (a) and (b) shall be considered to have taken 

18 effect on May 31, 2010. 

19 SEC. 3. BUDGET COMPLIANCE. 

20 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

21 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

22 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

23 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

24 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

25 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, proVerDate Mar 15 2010 01:42 Jul 01, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5569.RDS H5569

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5569 RDS 

1 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

2 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 23, 2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 23.0—CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consentto the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)of Inter-Tel (Delaware),Incorporated of our report dated March 9, 2007 with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Inter-Tel (Delaware), Incorporated.We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:(1) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-40353) pertaining to the 1990 Directors Stock OptionPlan,(2) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-83826) pertaining to the Inter-Tel, Incorporated 1994Long Term Incentive Plan,(3) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-73620) pertaining to the Inter-Tel, IncorporatedEmployee Stock Ownership Plan,(4) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-41197) pertaining to the Inter-Tel, Incorporated1997 Long Term Incentive Plan and Inter-Tel, Incorporated 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,(5) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-56872) pertaining to the Acquisition Stock OptionPlan,(6) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-67261) pertaining to the Acquisition Stock OptionPlan,(7) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-85098) pertaining to the Inter-Tel, Incorporated1997 Long Term Incentive Plan and Acquisition Stock Option Plan,(8) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-87474) pertaining to the Inter-Tel, Incorporated1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,(9) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-104642) pertaining to the Inter-Tel, Incorporated1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan,(10) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-016868) pertaining to the Inter-Tel, IncorporatedTax Deferred Savings Plan and Retirement Trust,(11) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-113600) pertaining to the Inter-Tel, Incorporated1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan,(12) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-123506) pertaining to the Inter-Tel, Incorporated1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan(13) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-58161), (14) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-61437), (15) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-01735), (16) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-12433), (17) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-39221); and(18) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-133594) pertaining to the Inter-Tel, Incorporated1997 Long-Term Incentive Planof our report dated March 9, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of Inter-Tel (Delaware), Incorporated, Inter-Tel (Delaware), Incorporated management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting of Inter-Tel (Delaware), Incorporated, included inthis Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Inter-Tel (Delaware), Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 2006.       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP       Phoenix, Arizona