alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATE OF
              PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CEC
Industries  Corp. for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, I, Jeffrey Sternberg,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of CEC Industries Corp.
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, that:



     1.       Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
              2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
              15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     2.       The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
              for the period ended June 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of CEC Industries Corp.

Dated:  August 16, 2004

CEC INDUSTRIES CORP.


By: /s/ Jeffrey Sternberg
-------------------------------------
Jeffrey Sternberg
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
# C_2007286EN.01004501.xml

| 28.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/45

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4911 — Goldman Sachs/LOMO)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 286/02)

On 22 November 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4911. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4911. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
#### DICKENS v. EVERHART

No. 30 PC.

Case below: 17 N.C. App. 362.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 30 April 1973.
Slip Op. 01-44 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

__________________________________________ : TRANSCOM, INC., : : Plaintiff, : : L & S BEARING COMPANY, : : Plaintiff-Intervenor, : : v. : Court No. 97-02-00249 : THE UNITED STATES, : : Defendant, : : THE TIMKEN COMPANY, : : Defendant-Intervenor. : __________________________________________: J U D G M E N T This Court having received and reviewed the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce”) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Transcom Inc., L & S Bearing Company v. United States , 24 CIT ___, 123 F. Supp. 2d 1372 (2000) (“Remand Results”), and Commerce having complied with the Court’s remand and no responses to the Remand Results having been submitted by the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the Remand Results filed by Commerce on February 23, 2001, are affirmed in their entirety; and it is further ORDERED that since all other issues have been decided, this case is dismissed.

__________________________________________ NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge Dated: April 17, 2001 New York, New York
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Strategic Internet
Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"). I, Ralph Shearing, Chief Executive Officer of the
company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



|Date: | November 14, 2007 |  | /s/
      Ralph Shearing     
|----- | ----------------- |  | -----------------------------
|      |                   |  | Ralph Shearing, CEO, Director

---
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Strategic Internet Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I,
Abbas Salih, Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: | August 22, 2005 | /s/ Abbas Salih      
|----- | --------------- | ---------------------
|      |                 | Abbas Salih, Director

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         1,169
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,247
<ALLOWANCES>                                   292
<INVENTORY>                                    402
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,339
<PP&E>                                         14,028
<DEPRECIATION>                                 10,380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,722
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       25
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,704
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,093
<SALES>                                        14,771
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               14,771
<CGS>                                          8,717
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,717
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,961
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             225
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (907)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (297)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (610)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (616)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.08)
        


</TABLE>
# L_2007246EN.01001001.xml

| 21.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 246/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 246/10

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1090/2007

of 20 September 2007

on the issuing of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of September 2007 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 979/2007 for pigmeat

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in pigmeat (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 979/2007 of 21 August 2007 opening and providing for the administration of an import tariff quota for pigmeat originating in Canada (2), and in particular Article 5(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 979/2007 opened import tariff quotas for pigmeat products. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 979/2007 opened import tariff quotas for pigmeat products.

| (2) | The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of September 2007 for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2007 do not cover the total quantity available. The quantities for which applications have not been lodged should therefore be determined and these should be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of September 2007 for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2007 do not cover the total quantity available. The quantities for which applications have not been lodged should therefore be determined and these should be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities for which import licence applications under quota 09.4204 have not been lodged under Regulation (EC) No 979/2007, to be added to the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2008, are 2 312 000 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 September 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 September 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 217, 22.8.2007, p. 12.

2

---
#### WILLIAM SIMONS, Appellant, v. DONREY, INC., a Nevada corporation, dba DONREY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING CO., Respondent.

No. 9333

November 10, 1978

582 P.2d 795

*Thornton, Stephens, Atkins & Kellison,*and *Phyllis Halsey Atkins*and *Steven R. Kosach,*Reno, for Appellant.

*James R. Brooke,*Reno, for Respondent.

*697OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Appellant commenced this action seeking damages and to enjoin respondent from removing a billboard which respondent had placed on appellant’s property.

At the conclusion of a trial without jury, the district court concluded (1) the billboard had been erected, through mutual mistake, on appellant’s property; and (2) respondent was the owner of the sign and entitled to remove it. The district court also ordered respondent to pay appellant $400.00 as reasonable rental fees for the ground upon which the sign was erected.

Appellant contends the evidence adduced at trial fails to support the district court’s judgment. We disagree.

Where, as here, there is substantial evidence to support factual determinations made by a trial court sitting without a jury, those determinations will not be disturbed on appeal. NRCP 52(a); Landex, Inc. v. State ex rel. List, 94 Nev. 469, 582 P.2d 786 (1978).

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Patricia STANTON, Individually and as representative of the Estate of Scott Allen Mitchell, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARRIS COUNTY; Harris County Sheriff's Department; Mark Hokett, Acting individually and in his official capacity; Shirley Voisin, Individually and in her official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-20571.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided April 5, 2005.

John C. Osborne, William Jackson Robertson, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

*571Michael Robert Hull, Assistant County Attorney, David M. Swope, County Attorney’s Office for the County of Harris, Houston, TX, Lisa Rice Hulsey, George Andrew Nachtigall, Bruce S. Powers, Assistant County Attorney, for DefendantsAppellees.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Patricia Stanton filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit against Harris County, the Harris County Sheriffs Department, Deputy Mark Hokett and Deputy Shirley Voisin, seeking damages arising out of the suicide of Ms. Stanton’s son, Scott Mitchell, while he was being held in the Clear Lake Jail in Harris County, Texas. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, dismissing Ms. Stanton’s claims. Ms. Stanton now appeals.

We review the district court’s decision to grant summary judgment *de novo,*drawing all inferences in favor of the nonmoving party. *Fraire v. Arlington,*957 F.2d 1268, 1273 (5th Cir.1992). In order to prevail on a § 1983 claim based on the alleged failure of law enforcement officials to prevent the suicide of a pretrial detainee, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the officials acted with deliberate indifference to the detainee’s needs. *Flores v. County of Hardeman,*124 F.3d 736, 738 (5th Cir. 1997). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Ms. Stanton, we con-elude that the actions of Deputies Hokett and Voisin did not rise to the level of deliberate indifference. It follows that Harris County cannot be liable. *See id.*

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### WOODS v. INSURANCE CO.

No. 96 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 156.

Petition by plaintiff - for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 21 December 1976.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                          44,892
<SECURITIES>                                    57,322
<RECEIVABLES>                                  520,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,972
<INVENTORY>                                    311,240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               970,755
<PP&E>                                       1,542,135
<DEPRECIATION>                                 714,679
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,052,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          517,723
<BONDS>                                        259,688
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,750
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,166,165
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,052,124
<SALES>                                      3,134,590
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,134,590
<CGS>                                        3,051,478
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,051,478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,252
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,310
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,310
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,310
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.01(d)

      

      

      

      D&J Construction, Inc.

      P.O. Box 1856 

      Fremont, Ca. 94538

       

      

      January 4, 2021

       

      ACM Research, Inc.

       42307 Osgood Rd., Unit I 

      Fremont, CA 94539

       

      
        	
                RE:

              	
                Expiration of Lease at 42307 Osgood Rd., Unit I, Fremont, CA 

                  

              


      

       

       Dear ACM Research, Inc.,

       

      

      Your current lease expires with D&J Construction, Inc. on March 31, 2021. D&J Construction, Inc. proposes a new two-year lease beginning April l, 2021 with an ending date of
        March 31, 2023.   D&J Construction, Inc. and ACM Research, Inc. have agreed upon the following rent rates:

       

      4/1/2021 - 3/31/2023

      Base rent: $1.13/square foot ($3,390.00) 

      CAM: $0.07/sf ($210.00)

      Monthly Total: $3,600.00

      

      

      We hope that this offer can be extended into an agreement that will be acceptable to both parties. Thank you, again, for leasing from D&J Construction, Inc.

       

      Very Truly Yours,

      D&J Construction, Inc.

      

       

      
        	
                /s/ Tammy Eliseian

              	
                 

              
	Tammy Eliseian	
                 

              
	President	
                 

              


      

       

      

      If this offer is acceptable, please indicate acceptance by signing below and returning to our office. By the undersigned signature this becomes a binding addendum to the Lease dated March 22, 2017 with all
        terms and conditions as set forth in the Lease effective thorough the ending date of this term.

      

      

      

      
        	
                
                  /s/ Lillian Chen

                

              	
                 

              
	
                Lillian Chen 

              	
                 

              
	
                Procurement and Office Manager 

              	
                 

              
	
                ACM Research, Inc.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Telos Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), we,
John B. Wood and Edward L. Williams, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
our knowledge:



(1) The report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



April 14, 2004/s/ John B. WoodJohn B. WoodChief Executive Officer/s/ Edward L. WilliamsEdward L. WilliamsInterim Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 522 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 522

To amend the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act 
    to authorize the Federal Trade Commission to issue new rules to 
prohibit any telemarketing calls during the hours of 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 
                                  p.m.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2009

Mr. King of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act 
    to authorize the Federal Trade Commission to issue new rules to 
prohibit any telemarketing calls during the hours of 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 
                                  p.m.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protection From Telemarketers Act''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION RULES.

    Section 3(a) of the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse 
Prevention Act (15 U.S.C. 6102) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(4) The Commission shall include in such rules respecting 
        other abusive telemarketing acts or practices a requirement 
        that telemarketers shall not initiate any outbound telephone 
        calls to any person during the hours of 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. 
        in the locality of the person called.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Eddie C. WILSON, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICE, INCORPORATED; Baltimore City Detention Center; Baltimore City Booking & Intake Center, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-7722.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 2005.

Decided April 12, 2005.

Eddie C. Wilson, Sr., Appellant pro se. Donald Joseph Crawford, Aldelman, Sheff & Smith, Rockville, Maryland; John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn Todd Marrow, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Eddie C. Wilson, Sr. appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible *517error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Wilson v. Prison Health Servs., Inc.,*No. CA-03-472-8-AW (D.Md. Oct. 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*