alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
                                      EXHIBIT 11


                                 IONICS, INCORPORATED

                           COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                   (Amounts in thousands, except earnings per share)
<CAPTION>
                                            Three Months Ended    Nine Months Ended
                                              September 30,         September 30,   
                                              1996       1995       1996       1995  
<S>                                         <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Net income                                  $ 6,853    $ 5,669    $19,378    $14,977

Earnings per common and common
   equivalent share:                                   

   Weighted average number of shares
     outstanding                             15,563     14,537     15,467     14,490

   Incremental shares for stock options
     under treasury stock method                481        616        575        500

   Weighted average number of common and
     common equivalent shares outstanding    16,044     15,153     16,042     14,990

   Earnings per common and common
     equivalent share                       $   .43    $   .37    $  1.21    $  1.00


Earnings per common and common equivalent
   share - assuming full dilution:

   Weighted average number of shares
     outstanding                             15,563     14,537     15,467     14,490

   Incremental shares for stock options
     under treasury stock method                554        677        609        583

   Weighted average number of common and
     common equivalent shares outstanding - 
       assuming full dilution                16,117     15,214     16,076     15,073

   Earnings per common and common
     equivalent share - assuming
       full dilution                        $   .43    $   .37    $  1.21    $   .99

</TABLE>
/13
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

R.J., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE,

Hazelwood, MO, Employer

_________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 22-0112

Issued: March 22, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Alan J. Shapiro, Esq., for the appellant1

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On November 1, 2021, appellant through counsel, filed a timely appeal from a

September 7, 2021, merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). 

The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 22-0112.

In a letter dated March 7, 2022, counsel requested that the appeal be dismissed.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that counsel’s request f or the 

dismissal of the appeal should be granted. Accordingly, 

1

In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no cla im f or a f ee f or 

legal or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 

20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board.

Id. An attorney or representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, 

subject to fine or imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of 

fees to a representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation.
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the request for the dismissal of the appeal is 

granted. The appeal docketed as No. 22-0112 is dismissed.

Issued: March 22, 2022

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
# C_2007282EN.01000701.xml

| 24.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4696 — KKR/Harman)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 282/03)

On 18 September 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4696. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4696. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel, Mechanisms of Mammalian Sperm Capacitation.                     

*Date:*                         November 23, 2005.                     

*Time:*                         10 a.m. to 12 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                     

*Contact Person:*                         Jon M. Ranhand, PhD, Scientist Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6884.                         *ranhandj@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 25, 2005. 

Anthony M. Coelho, Jr., 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 05-21826  Filed 11-1-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# L_2007069EN.01002501.xml

| 9.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 69/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 69/25

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 254/2007

of 8 March 2007

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 38/2007

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 of 17 January 2007 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale for export of sugar held by the intervention agencies of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 of 17 January 2007 opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale for export of sugar held by the intervention agencies of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 7 March 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 7 March 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 7 March 2007, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 38/2007 shall be 347,70 EUR/tonne.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 March 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 March 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1585/2006 (OJ L 294, 25.10.2006, p. 19).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 11, 18.1.2007, p. 4.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF JILCO INDUSTRIES FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL 30, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                             403
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   403
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     403
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          153,110
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       749,950
<OTHER-SE>                                   (902,657)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       403
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (44,289)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (44,289)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
(b) (6)



(b) (6)
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     Exhibit 3.6

The following amendments were adopted at the Board Meeting on March 27, 1998:


                             SPECIAL MEETING BYLAW

     Section 2.5 of the Bylaws shall be amended as follows:

     Special meeting of the stockholders for any purpose or purposes, unless
otherwise prescribed by statute or by the certificate of incorporation, may be
called by the Chairman of the Board or by a majority vote of the Board of
Directors.


                              ADVANCE NOTICE BYLAW

     Section 2.11 shall be added to the Bylaws as follows:

     A nomination shall be accepted, and votes cast for a proposed nominee shall
be counted by the inspectors of election, only if the Secretary of the Company
has received at least 90 days prior to the meeting a statement over the
signature of the proposed nominee that he consents to being the nominee and, if
elected intends to serve as a director.  Such statement shall also contain the
Bellwether stock ownership of the proposed nominee, occupations and business
history for the previous five years, other directorships and all other
information required by the federal proxy rules in effect at the time the
proposed nominee submits said statement.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 7, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40781 Summary Calendar

DOUGLAS ALAN BURDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNIDENTIFIED PARTY, Head Supervisor/Director of ATAR Spindletop Life Resources; DENA JOHNSON, Johnston’s Head Counselor; MIKE FAIRLEY, Head Coordinator of Substance Abuse; JAMES TABORWSKI, Probation Officer; ROSALYN COBBALD,

Director, ATAR Spindletop Life Resources, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CV-582

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Douglas Alan Burden, Texas prisoner # 11 60823, appeals from the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(b)(i), (ii) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim and moves for appointment of counsel. He argues that the district court erred in holding that he failed to state a claim under the Equal Protection Clause. Burden’s motion to file a supplemental reply brief is granted. Affording the dismissal the requisite de novo review, Geiger2

v. Jowers , 404 F.3d 371, 373 (5th Cir. 2005), we hold that Burden has failed to allege facts that would tend to show that he was intentionally treated differently from similarly situated clients of the treatment program without a rational basis for the distinction. See Village of Willowbrook v. Olech , 528 U.S. 562, 564 (2000) . He has therefore indeed failed to state an equal protection claim. Burden’s appeal presents no “exceptional circumstances,” and his motion for appointment of counsel is therefore denied. Ulmer

v. Chancellor , 691 F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 1982). Because his appeal is without arguable merit, it is dismissed. See 5TH CIR . R. 42.2; Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Burden is cautioned that the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), in addition to the strike for the district court’s dismissal. See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). He is further cautioned that if he accumulates three strikes under § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED; MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY BRIEF GRANTED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Motion Granted and Order filed March 10, 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14
- 14
- 00195
- CV

____________ IN RE ALI CHOUDHRI , Relator

O RIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 190th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca use No. 2012
- 27197


### ORDER On March 10, 2014, relator Ali Choudhri filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this Court

. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221 ; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52

. In his petition, r elator asks this C ourt to compel the Honorable Patricia K errigan, Judge of the 190th District Court of Harris County , to vacate her order dated March 4, 2014, entered in trial court cause number 2012

- 27197, styled2 Mokaram

- Latif West Loop, Ltd. v. Choudhri, et al . Relator claims the trial court abused its discret ion by overruling relator’s objections to the Special Master’s order compelling the production of relator’s tax returns

. Relator also has filed with this Court a motion for temporary stay. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. On March 10, 201 4 , relator ask e d this C ourt to stay enforcement of any orders in the underlying litigation requiring relator to disclose his tax returns pending a decision on the petition for writ of mandamus

. It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relator’s

re quest for relief requires further consideration and that relator will be prejudiced unless immediat e temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relator’s motion and issue the following order:
We ORDER that the enforcement of all orders in trial court cause number 2012

- 27197 , styled Mokaram

- Latif West Loop, Ltd. v. Choudhri, et al

. , requiring relator to disclose his tax returns be STAYED until a final decision by this C ourt on relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, or until further order of this C ourt

. We further ORDER relator to file under seal with the Clerk of this Court on or before March 14, 2014 certified or sworn copies of Exhibit Nos. 1

– 4 that were admitted into evidence by the trial court at the February 20, 2014 hearing in the underlying liti gation.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and Brown.
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

C.G., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, PROCESSING & 

DISTRIBUTION CENTER, Tampa, FL, 

Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-1397

Issued: June 15, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

JAMES D. MCGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On September 20, 2021 appellant timely filed an appeal from August 25 and September 8, 

2021 merit decisions of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of 

the Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 21-1408. 

On September 23, 2021 appellant timely filed another appeal from the same August 25 and 

September 8, 2021 decisions. The Clerk of the Appellate Boards inadvertently assigned Docket 

No. 21-1397. 

The Board, having duly considered the matter, finds that, since there are now two docket 

numbers assigned for a review of the same OWCP decisions, one of the docket numbers must be 

dismissed. Since the Clerk of the Appellate Boards inadvertently assigned Docket No. 21-1397 to 

appellant’s second appeal from the same OWCP decisions, this docket number must be dismissed. 

The appeal docketed as No. 21-1408 will go forward. 

Accordingly,
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-1397 is dismissed.

Issued: June 15, 2022

Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
reguslease_145a151xendin






04/01/2022, 11:10 Regus https://serviceagreement.regus.com/ServiceAgreement.aspx?id=4717c5f6853dd453481216da462cc186&user=regus&term=12&mostRecentVersi... 1/1 Renewal Agreement: Agreement Date : 7 December 2021 Confirmation No : R-2030978 Business Centre Details London - London Bridge Client Details Company Name VERONA PHARMA PLC Phone +44 20 3223 4200 Email paula.siu@veronapharma.com Service Provision : Start Date 1 March 2022 End Date 28 February 2023   Office Payment Details (exc.VAT and exc. services) Office Number Number of people Price per Office 145A 6 £ 12,405.00 151 1 £ 3,652.00 All agreements end on the last calendar day of the month. An Activation fee of £ 35.00 per occupant will be payable.  Terms and Conditions We are IW Group Services (UK) Limited, please click the link below for terms and conditions.  By signing our service Agreement, you agree to authorize Colliers International Rating UK LLP, as managing representative of IW Group Services (UK) Limited, to act on your behalf in connection with all business rates matters relating to IW Group Services (UK) Ltd managed property. This includes the payment of business rates and application of reliefs (including Small Business Rate Relief). Any business rates overpayments should be refunded to the payee ‘IW Group Services (UK) Ltd’ with all business rates correspondence sent C/O Rate Account Management, Colliers International, 50 George Street, London, W1U 7GA. Download the house rules