alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 213 (Friday, November 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67150-67154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22028]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 06-04]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 06-04 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: October 31, 2005.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 67151]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04NO05.008


[[Page 67152]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04NO05.009


[[Page 67153]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04NO05.010


[[Page 67154]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04NO05.011

[FR Doc. 05-22028 Filed 11-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON 
PAGES F-2 THROUGH F-4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         324,745
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,066,520
<ALLOWANCES>                                   252,795
<INVENTORY>                                    887,203
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,140,100
<PP&E>                                       9,134,489
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,540,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,217,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,087,580
<BONDS>                                      4,192,431
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,089,638
<COMMON>                                       131,396
<OTHER-SE>                                   (774,027)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,217,123
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,142,793
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,040,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               206,221
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             659,996
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (577,123)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (577,123)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (577,123)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-51038 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARTURO VILLARREAL, JR.,

also known as Tati,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(W-95-CR-7-1)

 

September 7, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.
We review the evidence in the light most favorable to the 

prosecution and determine whether "any rational trier of fact could have 

found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt." 

Jackson ix Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979) (emphasis omitted); Mitchell 

v. State, 124 Nev. 807, 816, 192 P.3d 721, 727 (2008). "NRS 205.090 

provides, among other things, that any person who (1) passes or attempts 

to pass, as true and genuine, a forged or false instrument, (2) knowing it to 

be forged or false, (3) with intent to defraud, is guilty of forgery." Patin v. 

Sheriff, Clark Cnty., 92 Nev. 673, 674, 557 P.2d 708, 708 (1976). 

The jury heard testimony that Anderson admitted to Police 

Officer Mario Perez, Jr., that he knew that the checks were bad and that 

they were going to cash them. Valeria Gonzalez testified that she, 

Anderson, and an unidentified male met with a third unidentified male. 

The third male handed Anderson a stack of papers and told him "[t]hat he 

would be able to cash the checks at a Walmart, this stack, and then 

tomorrow he would be good to cash the others." 2They then traveled to the 

Bighorn Casino, where Anderson handed her a check and told her to cash 

it. Gonzales saw her name and address on the check, but she did not 

recognize the name of the company that was identified as the drawee. She 

knew that it was not her check and that she would not be able to cash it 

because she did not work for that company And, when she attempted to 

cash the check, she was detained by security guards. The guards called 

the police and stated that they had placed a female in custody for trying to 

2The record indicates that this statement was admitted pursuant to 

NRS 51.035(3)(e) (a statement offered against a party that was made by a 

coconspirator of the party during the course and in furtherance of a 

conspiracy is not hearsay). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A e 
&vitae 

Pickering 

Saitta 

cash a bad check. The police impounded the check and it was later 

admitted into evidence. 

We conclude that a rational juror could reasonably infer from 

this evidence that the check Anderson attempted to pass was a forged or 

false instrument. See NRS 205.090; NRS 205.110; see also Doyle v. State, 

112 Nev. 879, 892, 921 P.2d 901, 910(1996) (describing the independent 

proof necessary to satisfy the corpus delicti rule), overruled on other 

grounds by Kaczmarek v. State, 120 Nev. 314, 333, 91 P.3d 16, 29 (2004). 

It is for the jury to determine the weight and credibility to give conflicting 

testimony, and the jury's verdict will not be disturbed on appeal where, as 

here, substantial evidence supports the verdict. See Bolden v. State, 97 

Nev. 71, 73, 624 P.2d 20, 20 (1981). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

J. 

cc: Hon. Jessie Elizabeth Walsh, District Judge 

Michael H. Schwarz 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) 1947A e
<PAGE>


                         EXHIBIT 12


   INTERNATIONAL MULTIFOODS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

     Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                        (unaudited)

                       (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                            ------------------
                                            June 2,     May 27,
                                              2001        2000
--------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                         <C>        <C>
Earnings before income taxes                $3,365     $ 7,661
Plus: Fixed charges(1)                       6,636       6,361
Less: Capitalized Interest                    (154)       (231)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings available to cover
  fixed charges                             $9,847     $13,791
==============================================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges            1.48        2.17
==============================================================
</TABLE>

(1) Fixed charges consisted of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                            ------------------
                                            June 2,     May 27,
                                              2001        2000
--------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                         <C>         <C>
Interest expense, gross                     $4,159      $4,207
Rentals (Interest Factor)                    2,477       2,154
--------------------------------------------------------------
  Total fixed charges                       $6,636      $6,361
==============================================================
</TABLE>
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5450 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3894 Crenshaw Boulevard in Los Angeles, 

California, as the ‘‘Tom Bradley Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5450 RFS

1 SECTION 1. TOM BRADLEY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 3894 Crenshaw Boulevard in Los 

4 Angeles, California, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Tom Bradley Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Tom Bradley Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 

By DEBORAH M. SPRIGGS, 

Deputy Clerk. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

S.C., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE,

New Orleans, LA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0016

Issued: October 26, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Anita Lewallen, for the appellant1

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On October 6, 2022 appellant, through her representative, filed an appeal from a

January 19, 2022 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). 

The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 23-0016.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act (FECA).

2

 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the 

Board’s review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of 

issuance of OWCP’s decision.3

1

In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no cla im f or a f ee f or 

legal or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 

20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board.

Id. An attorney or representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, 

subject to fine or imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of 

fees to a representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation.

2

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

3

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e).
2

The 180th day following the January 19, 2022 decision was July 18, 2022. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until October 6, 2022, more than 180 days after the

January 19, 2022 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 23-0016 is 

untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not 

explained her failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to 

establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP 

within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed 

as No. 23-0016, must be dismissed.4 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-0016 is dismissed.

Issued: October 26, 2022

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

4 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id.

at § 501.6(d).
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Banknote Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Patrick J. Gentile, Senior Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                                  /s/ Patrick J. Gentile
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Patrick J. Gentile
                                                  Senior Vice President Finance
                                                  and Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 14, 2003

                                       43
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wisconsin Power and Light Company (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ William D. Harvey

William D. Harvey

Chief Executive Officer

 

/s/ Eliot G. Protsch

Eliot G. Protsch

Chief Financial Officer

 

November 8, 2005
#### KEITH L. BRACKENBROUGH, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 7862

July 23, 1975

537 P.2d 1194

*Halley and Halley,*of Reno, for Appellant.

*Larry R. Hicks,*District Attorney, and *Kathleen M. Wall,*Assistant Chief Deputy District Attorney, Washoe County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Claiming ineffective counsel, Brackenbrough asks us to annul his conviction. He does not direct our attention to anything in the record of the trial to support his claim, but instead, relies solely upon assertions made in a letter he wrote to the presiding judge following conviction. On this direct appeal, we cannot credit such letter and the assertions therein contained. He may, of course, pursue the remedy accorded by the Post-Conviction Act, NRS 177.315-385, and obtain appropriate consideration of his claim of ineffective counsel. His other claimed error is without merit.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Continental Airlines, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Continental Airlines, Inc. and will be retained by Continental Airlines, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Dated: February 20, 2008

 

/s/ Lawrence W. Kellner	

Lawrence W. Kellner

Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

/s/ Jeffrey J. Misner		

Jeffrey J. Misner

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer
# C_2007262EN.01000701.xml

| 1.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4775 — MAN/Hörmann/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 262/03)

On 9 October 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4775. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4775. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY
  ACT

I, Abbas Salih, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report for period ending June 30, 2003 on
  Form 10-QSB of Strategic Internet Investments Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
  the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
  report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
  included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
  financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
  as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
  and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
  Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
  information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
  period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
  procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly
  report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
  of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
  Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
  on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
  of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
  which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
  and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors
  any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
  who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
  quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
  or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
  to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
  with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

|Date: August 19, 2003 | /s/ Abbas Salih        
|--------------------- | -----------------------
|                      |                        
|                      | Abbas Salih            
|                      | Chief Financial Officer

---