alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30684

 

RICKEY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellee - Cross-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD L. STALDER, 

Secretary of Louisiana Department of 

Public Safety and Corrections,

Defendant - Appellant - Cross-Appellee,

EDWIN W. EDWARDS, Governor; 

RICHARD A. WALL, Warden

Defendants - Appellees.

 

Appeals from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Louisiana 

(94-CV-1779)

 

May 28, 1997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The parties agree that the judgment entered below should

properly read against Richard Wall. The State of Louisiana is the

party at interest since both Richard Wall and Richard Stalder are

before us in their official capacities. We grant the request to
2

correct the clerical mistake. 

We are persuaded that there is sufficient evidence to support

the jury verdict and that the district court did not abuse its

discretion in its order of relief.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 210 (Tuesday, November 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 65918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21658]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review, Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, October 31, 2005, 2 p.m. to 
October 31, 2005, 4 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge 
Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the Federal Register 
on October 18, 2005, 70 FR 60547-60548.
    The meeting will be held November 4, 2005, from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. 
The meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: October 20, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-21658 Filed 10-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

C.M., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE,

Hilton Head, SC, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-1084

September 6, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On August 10, 2023 appellant filed an appeal from a July 14, 2022 nonmerit decision of 

the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned the appeal Docket No. 23-1084.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act.1 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance 

of OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the July 14, 2022 decision was January 10, 2023. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until August 10, 2023, more than 180 days after the July 14, 

2022 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 23-1084 is untimely filed. 

The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not explained her failure to 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the 

date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.”
2

timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to establish compelling 

circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of 

the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 2 3-1084, 

must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-1084 is dismissed.

Issued: September 6, 2023

Washington, DC

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id.

at § 501.6(d).
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 207 / Thursday, October 27, 2005 / Presidential Documents 62027 

Notice of October 25, 2005 

Continuation of National Emergency Regarding the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction 

On November 14, 1994, by Executive Order 12938, President Clinton declared 

a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat 

to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States 

posed by the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons 

(weapons of mass destruction) and the means of delivering such weapons. 

On July 28, 1998, the President issued Executive Order 13094 amending 

Executive Order 12938 to respond more effectively to the worldwide threat 

of weapons of mass destruction proliferation activities. On June 28, 2005, 

I issued Executive Order 13382 which, inter alia, further amended Executive 

Order 12938 to improve our ability to combat proliferation. Because the 

proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering 

them continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 

security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, the national 

emergency first declared on November 14, 1994, must continue in effect 

beyond November 14, 2005. In accordance with section 202(d) of the National 

Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national 

emergency declared in Executive Order 12938, as amended. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted 

to the Congress. 

W 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

October 25, 2005. 

[FR Doc. 05–21572 

Filed 10–26–05; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 210 (Tuesday, November 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 65980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21700]

[[Page 65980]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service

Federal Debt Collection and Discount and Rebate Evaluation

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of rate for use in Federal debt collection and discount 
and rebate evaluation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 11 of the Debt Collection Act of 1982, as 
amended, (31 U.S.C. 3717), the Secretary of the Treasury is responsible 
for computing and publishing the percentage rate to be used in 
assessing interest charges for outstanding debts owed to the 
Government. Treasury's Cash Management Requirements (1 TFM 6-8000) 
prescribe use of this rate by agencies as a comparison point in 
evaluating the cost-effectiveness of a cash discount. In addition, 5 
CFR Part 1315.8 of the Prompt Payment rule on ``Rebates'' requires that 
this rate be used in determining when agencies should pay purchase card 
invoices when the card issuer offers a rebate. Notice is hereby given 
that the applicable rate is 2.00 percent for calendar year 2006.

DATES: The rate will be in effect for the period beginning January 1, 
2006, and ending on December 31, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquiries should be directed to the 
Agency Enterprise Solutions Division, Financial Management Service, 
Department of the Treasury, 401 14th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20227 
(Telephone: 202-874-6650).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The rate reflects the current value of funds 
to the Treasury for use in connection with Federal Cash Management 
systems and is based on investment rates set for purposes of Pub. L. 
95-147, 91 Stat. 1227. Computed each year by averaging Treasury Tax and 
Loan (TT&L) investment rates for the 12-month period ending every 
September 30, rounded to the nearest whole percentage, for 
applicability effective each January 1, the rate is subject to 
quarterly revisions if the annual average, on a moving basis, changes 
by 2 percentage points. The rate in effect for the calendar year 2006 
reflects the average investment rates for the 12-month period that 
ended September 30, 2005.

    Dated: October 19, 2005.
Gary Grippo,
Assistant Commissioner, Federal Finance.
[FR Doc. 05-21700 Filed 10-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
```
# L_2007277EN.01003301.xml

| 20.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 277/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 277/33

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1222/2007 of 18 October 2007 fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors for egg albumin, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 275 of 19 October 2007
  )

On page 31, in the table in the Annex, in the third column ‘Representative price’, for CN code 0207 14 10:

for:

‘
  214,1
  ’,

read:

‘
  241,1
  ’.

---
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION  I, Randal Hardy, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Timberline Resources Corporation, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Timberline Resources Corporation,  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.  Date: May 14, 2008By: /s/ Randal Hardy
_____________________________
Randal Hardy
Chief Executive Officer &Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                         381,746
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  709,923
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (56,694)
<INVENTORY>                                    531,066
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,601,016
<PP&E>                                       1,004,608
<DEPRECIATION>                               (752,205)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,027,981
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          608,796
<BONDS>                                         64,162
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       161,770
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,027,981
<SALES>                                        711,459
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,536,525
<CGS>                                          493,161
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,755,319
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,461
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                870,993
<INCOME-TAX>                                    70,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            800,993
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   800,993
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission of Fine Arts

The Commission of Fine Arts' meeting scheduled for December 15, 2005 has been canceled. The next meeting is scheduled for January 19, 2006 at 9 a.m. in the Commission's offices in the National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion affecting the appearance of Washington, DC, may include buildings, parks and memorials.

                    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission are available on our Web site:                     *http://www.cfa.gov.*                     Inquiries regarding the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be addressed to Thomas E. Luebke, Secretary, Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address or call 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date.                

Dated in Washington, DC, November 1, 2005. 

Thomas E. Luebke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 05-22088 Filed 11-4-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
#### FRANK LUCKETT, Appellant, v. WARDEN, NEVADA STATE PRISON, Respondent.

No. 8044

September 8, 1975

539 P.2d 1219

*Horace R. Goff,*State Public Defender, and *Michael Griffin,*Deputy State Public Defender, Carson City, for Appellant.

*Robert List,*Attorney General, and *Patrick B. Walsh,*Deputy Attorney General, Carson City, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Frank Luckett, convicted of grand larceny and currently incarcerated under a six-year prison term, is appealing from a *542district court order denying his petition for post-conviction relief.

The pertinent part of the information upon which he was convicted charged that “Luckett . . . did wilfully and unlawfully steal, take and carry away personal property, to wit: negotiable gambling chips of the value of $800.00,. ..”

His only cognizable contention below, and in this appeal, is that the information is fatally defective because it included the word “negotiable,” when in fact, gambling chips are not freely negotiable.

The contention is without merit. At most we deem the word “negotiable,” as used in the now challenged information, to be mere surplusage. See State v. Lawry, 4 Nev. 161 (1868); Nevada v. Pierce, 8 Nev. 291 (1873). If Luckett felt the word was prejudicial, his remedy was a pretrial motion to have it stricken, pursuant to NRS 173.085. See Carson v. Sheriff, 87 Nev. 357, 359, 487 P.2d 334, 335 (1971).

Affirmed.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Munilla Construction Management, LLC ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W912EP-13-C-0008 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60664 

Karl Dix, Jr., Esq. 

Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP 

Atlanta, GA 

Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Joshua R. Holmes, Esq. 

B. Seth Johnson, Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorneys 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Jacksonville 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 6 October 2016 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60664, Appeal ofMunilla 

Construction Management, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM

 

TheBoard of Directors

PioneerDrilling Company:

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements onForm S-8 of Pioneer Drilling Company (Reg. Nos. 333-48286 and 333-110569) andthe registration statement on Form S-3 (Reg. No. 333-113036) of our reportdated June 23, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of PioneerDrilling Company and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, and therelated consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity andcomprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-yearperiod ended March 31, 2004, which report appears in the Annual Report onForm 10-K of Pioneer Drilling Company for the fiscal year ended March 31,2004.

 

 

SanAntonio, Texas

June 28, 2004

 

----
Exhibit 10.6
​
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy
Under the Company’s non-employee director compensation policy, all non-employee directors will be paid an annual retainer fee of $47,500 and such additional fees as are set forth in the following table. All payments will be made quarterly in arrears.
	Non-Employee Director
		Annual Fee
	
	Lead Director
		$
	35,000
	
	Non-Executive Chair
		$
	30,000
	
	Chairman of the audit committee
		$
	20,000
	
	Member of the audit committee (other than chairman)
		$
	10,000
	
	Chairman of the compensation committee
		$
	15,000
	
	Member of the compensation committee (other than chairman)
		$
	7,500
	
	Chairman of the governance and nominating committee
		$
	10,000
	
	Member of the governance and nominating committee (other than chairman)
		$
	5,000
	


​
Under the policy, each individual who is initially appointed or elected to the board of directors will be eligible to receive an option to purchase up to 40,000 shares of our common stock under the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan on the date he or she first becomes a non-employee director. These option grants will vest annually over a three-year period from the date of grant, subject to continued service as a non-employee director through that vesting date. In addition, on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders, each continuing non-employee director who has served on the board of directors for a minimum of six months will be eligible to receive an option grant to purchase up to 20,000 shares of our common stock, which will vest in full upon the earlier of the first anniversary of the date of grant or the date of the next annual meeting of stockholders. The exercise price for each of these option grants will be equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. These new director grants and annual grants will be subject to approval by our board of directors at the time of grant. The share numbers set forth herein will be appropriately adjusted for any split or recapitalization of the Company’s securities.

​
​
#### STATE v. SMITH

No. 48 PC.

Case below: 4 N.C. App. 261.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 19 May 1969.
# C_2007111EN.01000101.xml

| 17.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4531 — WWL/EUKOR/Armacup/Agencie)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 111/01)

On 10 May 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4531. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4531. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---