alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<NAME> JAYARK CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             484
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,194
<ALLOWANCES>                                       636
<INVENTORY>                                      8,443
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,763
<PP&E>                                           2,165
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,439
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,889
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,766
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,285)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,784
<SALES>                                         38,914
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,914
<CGS>                                           31,932
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,367
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 871
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,256)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       320
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,576)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,576)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)
        


</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 10410 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ANTANESHIA LENISE WOODSON , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12

- CR

- 167

- 2

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Antaneshia Lenise Woodson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Woodson h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 2 1 , 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-10410 Document: 00512539938 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2014No. 13

- 10410

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-10410 Document: 00512539938 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2014
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ C ase No. 5D 23- 2491 LT Case No. 2016

- CF

- 4191 -A

_____________________________ A NTONIO A. W ILLIAMS , A ppellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , A ppellee.

_____________________________

3.850 a ppeal from the Circuit Court f or Duval County

. Jeb Branham , J udge

. Antonio A. W illiam, Carrabelle , pro s e. Ashley M oody, A ttorney G eneral , a nd Damaris E

. Reynolds , A ssistant A ttorney General , T allahassee , for Appellee.

De ce mber 12, 2023

P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

. E DWARDS , C.J. , W ALLIS , and M AC I VER , JJ., co ncur .2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
#### PARSONS v. BAILEY

No. 57 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 497.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 November 1976.
#### ROBERT LEE CONLEY, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 7760

December 20, 1974

529 P.2d 793

*430
      *Horace R. Goff,*State Public Defender, Carson City, for Appellant.

*Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *William P. Beko,*District Attorney, and *Peter L. Knight,*Deputy District Attorney, Nye County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

*A*jury found Robert Lee Conley, the appellant, guilty of battery committed with a deadly weapon. He seeks reversal of his judgment of conviction on the sole ground that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during his trial, in derogation of his rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. His complaint is narrowed to two specifics: (1) That his trial counsel failed to object to the testimony of one of the State’s witnesses “who could recall nothing at the preliminary hearing but at trial had one hundred percent (100%) recall” and (2) counsel failed to object to an opinion offered by a defense witness on cross-examination by the State.

Conley’s objections are without merit. Approximately 15 persons witnessed the battery, and the sole issue was whether the battery (a shooting) was in self-defense. A jury resolved the issue against Conley and found him guilty.

Even if the omissions of counsel could be granted the status of materiality, they fall far short of the standard this court recently announced in Warden v. Lischko, 90 Nev. 221, 222, 523 P.2d 6, 7 (1974):

“The standard by which such a claim is to be tested is whether the effectiveness of counsel was of such low caliber *431as to reduce the trial to a sham, a farce, or a pretense. [Citing cases.] It is presumed that counsel fully discharged his duties, and that presumption can only be overcome by strong and convincing proof to the contrary. . . .”

Indeed, the record in the instant case reflects a creditable effort on the part of Conley’s trial counsel. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



       STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                       BY
    PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER REGARDING FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO
                              EXCHANGE ACT FILINGS

                              Dated - March 7, 2003


         In accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I,
Kshitij Mohan, hereby certify that the periodic report, to which this Statement
is attached, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
periodic report to which this Statement is attached, fairly present, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Statement as of
the date first written above.





                                      /s/  Kshitij Mohan
                                      -------------------------------------
                                      Kshitij Mohan
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>


                            EXHIBIT 11


      INTERNATIONAL MULTIFOODS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

             Computation of Earnings per Common Share
                           (unaudited)

             (in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                  ------------------
                                                  June 2,     May 27,
                                                    2001        2000
--------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                               <C>         <C>
Average shares of common stock outstanding        18,762      18,736
Dilutive Potential Common Shares                     210          23
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Total adjusted average shares                     18,972      18,759
====================================================================

Net earnings applicable to common stock           $2,086      $4,750
====================================================================

Earnings per share of common stock:
  Basic                                           $  .11      $  .25
====================================================================
  Diluted                                         $  .11      $  .25
====================================================================
</TABLE>


Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.

Diluted earnings per share are computed similar to basic earnings per share
except that the weighted average shares outstanding are increased to include
additional shares from the assumed exercise of stock options, if dilutive. The
number of additional shares is calculated by assuming that outstanding stock
options were exercised and that the proceeds from such exercises were used to
acquire shares of common stock at the average market price during the period.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Intelligent Systems Corporation
Norcross, GA

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (Form S-8 No. 333-58134, No. 333-32157 and No. 33-99432) of our
report dated March 4, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Intelligent Systems Corporation and Subsidiaries appearing in
the company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

BDO Seidman, LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 26, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 214 (Monday, November 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67475-67476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22174]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in open session at 
10 a.m. on Tuesday, November 8, 2005, to consider the following 
matters:

Summary Agenda

    No substantive discussion of the following items is anticipated. 
These matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of 
the Board of Directors requests that an item be moved to the discussion 
agenda.
    Summary reports, status reports, and reports of actions taken 
pursuant to authority delegated by the Board of Directors.
    Memorandum and resolution re: Final Rule Implementing Senior 
Examiner Post-employment Restrictions under section 10(k) of the 
Federal Deposit Insurance Act, as added by the Intelligence Reform and 
Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004.
    Memorandum and resolution re: Final Part 334 Medical Privacy 
Regulations under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 
2003.

Discussion Agenda

    Memorandum re: The FDIC Insurance Funds: Outlook and Premium Rate 
Recommendations for the First Semiannual Assessment Period of 2006.
    Memorandum and resolution re: Final Rule--Amendments to Annual 
Audit and Reporting Requirements (Part 363) to Raise the Asset Size 
Threshold for Assessments of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 
and for Independent Audit Committees from $500 Million to $1 Billion.
    The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of 
the FDIC Building located at 550--17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.
    The FDIC will provide attendees with auxiliary aids (e.g., sign 
language interpretation) required for this meeting. Those attendees 
needing such assistance should call (202) 416-2089 (Voice); or (202) 
416-2007 (TTY), to make necessary arrangements.
    Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be 
directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive

[[Page 67476]]

Secretary of the Corporation, at (202) 898-7122.

    Dated: November 1, 2005.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-22174 Filed 11-2-05; 5:10 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
Presidential Documents

66745 

Federal Register 

Vol. 70, No. 211 

Tuesday, November 2, 2005 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of November 1, 2005 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to 

Sudan 

On November 3, 1997, by Executive Order 13067, the President declared 

a national emergency with respect to Sudan pursuant to the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706) to deal with the 

unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy 

of the United States constituted by the actions and policies of the Government 

of Sudan. Because the actions and policies of the Government of Sudan 

continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security 

and foreign policy of the United States, the national emergency declared 

on November 3, 1997, and the measures adopted on that date to deal 

with that emergency must continue in effect beyond November 3, 2005. 

Therefore, consistent with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act 

(50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency 

with respect to Sudan. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted 

to the Congress. 

W 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

November 1, 2005. 

[FR Doc. 05–22015 

Filed 11–1–05; 11:19 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 23
FORM 10-K
VERSA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-49024, 33-86446, 333-17135 and 333-17137 and File No. 2-87421 of Versa
Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries on Forms S-3 and S-8 of our reports dated
May 9, 1997, appearing in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Versa Technologies, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 1997.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
June 13, 1997
# C_2007177EN.01000201.xml

| 31.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 177/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4717 — TAC/Tower Automotive)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 177/03)

On 12 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4717. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4717. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

B.J., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, MARINA 

PROCESSING & DISTRIBUTION CENTER,

Inglewood, CA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0558

Issued: March 31, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On February 24, 2021 appellant filed an appeal from a June 26, 2020 merit decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 21-0558.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.1 

For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review 

authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s 

decision.2

The 180th day following the June 26, 2020 decision was December 23, 2020. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until February 24, 2021, more than 180 days after the June 26,

2020 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 21-0558 is untimely filed. 

The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not offered a reason to 

 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e).
2

explain the failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to establish 

compelling circumstances.

The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date 

of their issuance.”

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0558 is dismissed.

Issued: March 31, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

 

3

Id. at § 501.6(d).
#### FENCE CO. v. CHEMICALS, INC.

No. 2 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 524.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 31 January 1977.
# C_2007310EN.01000201.xml

| 20.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4801 — OEP/Schoeller/SAS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 310/03)

On 16 November 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4801. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4801. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of Open Meeting.

*Dates:*                     0800-2000, Nov. 29, 2005, (Symposium). 0630-0800, Nov. 30, 2005, (DAB meeting). 0800-1700, Nov. 30, 2005, (Symposium).                

*Location:*                     Hilton McLean Tyson's Corner, 7920 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, VA 22102.                

# SUMMARY:

The DAB for ESGR meeting will focus on the status of DoD actions and recommendations from previous DAB meetings. In addition, the DAB members will attend the “The New Reserves: Strategic in Peace, Operational in War” symposium at Hilton McLean Tyson's Corner.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        CPT Edward Hooks at 703-696-1386 x636 or by e-mail at                         *Edward.hooks@osd.mil.*

Dated: November 1, 2005.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.

[FR Doc. 05-22071 Filed 11-4-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M