alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007257EN.01000601.xml

| 30.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4686 — Louis Delhaize/Magyar Hipermarket KFT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 257/04)

On 9 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4686. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4686. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
# C_2007099EN.01000401.xml

| 3.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 99/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 99/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4505 — Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold/Phelps Dodge Corporation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 99/07)

On 20 February 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4505. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4505. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pinnacle Foods Group Inc. (the Registrant) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 27, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, N. Michael Dion, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. Date:
    
    May 9, 2005/s/ N. MICHAEL DIONN. Michael DionExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 60
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1999 FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  INCLUDED IN WISCONSIN  POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S
FORM 10-Q AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000107832
<NAME>                        WISCONSIN POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      1,221,777
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    165,733
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         92,550
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       113,058
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 74,788
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,667,906
<COMMON>                                       66,183
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      199,438
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            305,181
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 570,802
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    59,963
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           414,603
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             51,102
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      56,975
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 514,461
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  1,667,906
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      202,990
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           15,505  <F1>
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     156,599
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     156,599 <F1>
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        46,391
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             5,267
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 51,658
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       9,865
<NET-INCOME>                                   26,288
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    828
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  25,460
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       14,588
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      33,060
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         83,618
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0  <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0  <F2>
        
<FN>
<F1>  Income tax expense is not included in Operating Expense in the 
      Consolidated Statements of Income.
<F2>  Earnings per share of common stock is not reflected because all common 
      shares are held by Interstate Energy Corporation.
</FN>

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-81697) pertaining to the 1998 Long Term Stock Incentive
Plan and the 1998 Executive Officer Incentive Plan of Zilog Inc. of our
report dated January 18, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of ZiLOG Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.



                                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
San Jose, California
March 28, 2000
# L_2007165EN.01003501.xml

| 27.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 165/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 165/35

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 208/2007 of 27 February 2007 adapting Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 laying down detailed rules for the supply of food from intervention stocks for the benefit of the most deprived persons in the Community, by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 61 of 28 February 2007
  )

The publication of this Regulation in the abovementioned Official Journal is annulled.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 
                           SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ZiLOG, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Darin Billerbeck, as Chief Executive Officer of ZiLOG, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZiLOG, Inc.



| |                               
| | ------------------------------
| | Date: June 29, 2009           
| |                               
| | By:    /s/ Darin G. Billerbeck

| |                                                
| | -----------------------------------------------
| |                                                
| | Darin G. Billerbeck                            
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

In connection with the Annual Report of ZiLOG, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Perry J. Grace, as Chief Financial Officer of ZiLOG, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of ZiLOG, Inc.



| |                          
| | -------------------------
| | Date: June 29, 2009      
| |                          
| | By:    /s/ Perry J. Grace

| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| |                                                     
| | Perry J. Grace                                      
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 23 [Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc., letterhead] March 10, 2004 San Juan Basin Royalty Trust
TexasBank, Trust Department
2525 Ridgmar Boulevard, Suite 100
Fort Worth, Texas 76116 Ladies and Gentlemen: Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc. hereby consents to the use of the oil
and gas reserve information in the San Juan Basin Royalty Trust Securities &
Exchange Commission Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and in the
San Juan Basin Royalty Trust Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2003
based on reserve reports prepared by Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc. and
dated March 5, 2004. Sincerely,/s/ Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Restated for impact of acquisition of CBFA in February 2000, accounted for as a
pooling of interests.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1999
<CASH>                                              33
<SECURITIES>                                         6
<RECEIVABLES>                                      660
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5
<INVENTORY>                                        499
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,264
<PP&E>                                           2,914
<DEPRECIATION>                                     869
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              940
<BONDS>                                            769
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                6
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,481
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,382
<SALES>                                          3,211
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,211
<CGS>                                            3,006
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,006
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                99,348
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     5
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     92
<INCOME-TAX>                                        35
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 57
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        57
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .53


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. PURYEAR

No. 76 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 719.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 December 1976. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 7 December 1976.
# C_2008004EN.01000401.xml

| 9.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 4/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 4/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4611 — Egmont/Bonnier (Books))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 4/02)

On 15 October 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4611. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4611. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 22, 2010

d1115 

# Order

November 22, 2010

141607

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141607 COA: 291307 Kent CC: 08-003732-FC THOMAS JAMES TILSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 1, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
#### Ram SINGH, a.k.a. Singh Ram, a.k.a. Sukhdev Ram, Petitioner, v. *852Alberto GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-74497.

Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 4, 2005.**

Decided April 7, 2005.

Robert B. Jobe, Esq., Law Offices of Robert B. Jobe, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before KOZINSKI, HAWKINS and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Ram Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of deportation. Because the transitional rules apply, we have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). *See Movsisian v. Ashcroft,*395 F.3d 1095, 1096 (9th Cir.2005). We review for substantial evidence, *see Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir.2000), and will uphold the decision unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion, *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s and IJ’s decisions. Even if we were to assume Singh established past persecution on account of an enumerated ground based on the 1990 incident with police, substantial evidence supports the conclusion that conditions have changed in India such that *853Singh no longer has a well-founded fear of persecution. *See Gonzalez-Hernandez,*336 F.3d 995, 1000-01 (9th Cir.2003) (upholding a denial of asylum based on changed country conditions where the agency rationally construed State Department report). Moreover, all Singh’s family members, who are also Hindu, continue to reside unharmed in India. *See Hakeem, v. INS,*273 F.3d 812, 816 (9th Cir.2001) (stating that continual presence of similarly-situated family members without incident undercuts applicant’s claim of persecution). Finally, Singh’s fear is farther undermined because he managed to reside in the Punjab for a year and a half after the incident. *See Gonzalez-Hernandez,*336 F.3d at 999.

Because Singh failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of deportation. *See Movsisian,*395 F.3d at 1097.

Pursuant to *Elian v. Ashcroft,*370 F.3d 897 (9th Cir.2004), petitioner’s voluntary departure period will begin to run upon issuance of this court’s mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 214 (Monday, November 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 67459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22071]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Secretary of Defense's Defense Advisory Board 
(DAB) for Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve (ESGR)

AGENCY: Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dates: 0800-2000, Nov. 29, 2005, (Symposium). 0630-0800, Nov. 30, 
2005, (DAB meeting). 0800-1700, Nov. 30, 2005, (Symposium).
    Location: Hilton McLean Tyson's Corner, 7920 Jones Branch Drive, 
McLean, VA 22102.
SUMMARY: The DAB for ESGR meeting will focus on the status of DoD 
actions and recommendations from previous DAB meetings. In addition, 
the DAB members will attend the ``The New Reserves: Strategic in Peace, 
Operational in War'' symposium at Hilton McLean Tyson's Corner.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CPT Edward Hooks at 703-696-1386 x636 
or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#632607140211074d0b0c0c0810230c10074d0e0a0f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="440120332536206a2c2b2b2f37042b37206a292d28">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 1, 2005.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. 05-22071 Filed 11-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Walter C. Noyes, as Receiver of The Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company, Respondent, *v.*First National Bank of New York, Appellant.

*Noyes*v. *First Nat. Bank of New York,*180 App. Div. 162, affirmed.

(Argued May 7, 1918;

decided June 4, 1918.)

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 2, 1918, in favor of plaintiff upon the submission of a controversy under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Beginning in 1905 and prior to the appointment of the plaintiff as its receiver, the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company caused certain deposits of money to be made in the defendant bank from time to time for the payment through the bank of certain interest coupons as they matured from time- to time upon two issues of bonds of the railroad company. On January 18, 1915, the date of the appointment of the plaintiff as receiver of the railroad company, there-remained unclaimed balances in the bank. The bank knew of the appointment of the plaintiff as receiver at the time of his appointment. Several months afterwards it began rendering monthly statements to him showing the balances in the accounts. On December 9, 1915, the plaintiff made formal demand *543on the bank for the sums in the said accounts, which demand was refused. In the submission of controversy the plaintiff demanded judgment for the amounts on deposit with interest, and the defendant demanded a dismissal of the controversy.

*Joseph M. Hartfield*for appellant.

*W. D. Waldron*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, without costs, on opinion of Scott, J., below.

Concur: Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Not voting: His cock, Ch. J.