United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

S.C., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPENDENTS 

SCHOOLS, LAKENHEATH MIDDLE 

SCHOOL, Feltwell, Norfolk, U.K., Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0404

Issued: October 20, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

JURISDICTION

On January 28, 2021 appellant filed a timely appeal from a September 15, 2020 merit 

decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP).1 Pursuant to the Federal 

Employees’ Compensation Act2(FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board has 

jurisdiction over the merits of this case.

ISSUES

The issues are: (1) whether OWCP properly determined that appellant received an 

overpayment of compensation in the amount of $27,428.36 for the period July 6, 2017 through 

1 The Board notes that, following the September 15, 2020 decision, OWCP and the Board received additional 

evidence. However, the Board’s Rules of Procedure provides: “The Board’s review of a case is limited to the 

evidence in the case record that was before OWCP at the time of its final decision. Evidence not before OWCP will 

not be considered by the Board for the first time on appeal.” 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c)(1). Thus, the Board is precluded 

from reviewing this additional evidence for the first time on appeal. Id.

2

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.
2

July 18, 2020 for which she was at fault, as she concurrently received FECA wage-loss 

compensation and Social Security Administration (SSA) age-related retirement benefits without 

an appropriate offset; (2) whether OWCP properly denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment;

and (3) whether OWCP properly required recovery of the overpayment by deducting $400.00 

every 28 days from appellant’s continuing compensation payments.

FACTUAL HISTORY

On December 20, 1999 appellant, then a 48-year-old teacher, filed a traumatic injury claim 

(Form CA-1) alleging that on December 11, 1999 she sustained injuries to her head, legs, chest, 

and right shoulder as the result of a motor vehicle accident while in the performance of duty. She 

stopped work on that date.3 On the reverse side of the claim form, her supervisor indicated that 

she was covered by the Federal Employees’ Retirement System (FERS). 

On January 9, 2004 OWCPaccepted appellant’s claim for right femur fracture, right patella 

fracture, sternum fracture, nasal bone fracture, forehead laceration, concussion, central auditory 

processing disorder, subluxed right sternoclavicular joint, left knee partial anterior cruciate 

ligament tear/bony fragment, rib cage contusions/costal chondral separations, quadriceps tendon 

laceration, right knee post-traumatic global osteopenia, inflammation of the right 

acromioclavicular (AC) joint, central auditory processing disorder, post-traumatic right knee 

global osteopenia, and left knee partial anterior cruciate ligament tear.

On January 29, 2003 OWCP authorized wage-loss compensation on the daily rolls. 

Beginning on April 14, 2004, it paid wage-loss compensation on the periodic rolls, effective 

January 29, 2003.

In an April 3, 2009 letter, OWCP noted that appellant had received a third-party recovery 

in the amount of $1,500,000.00 resulting in a retained surplus in the amount of $478,213.39. It 

ended her wage-loss compensation, effective April 12, 2009, until the surplus was depleted. On 

May 4, 2009 OWCP noted that appellant had elected Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 

benefits.

In a memorandum of telephone call (Form CA-110) dated April 2, 2019, OWCP indicated

that it had informed appellant that as she had reached retirement age and that it would ask SSA to 

complete documentation of her FERS offset. In May 24, 2019 CA-110 notes, it advised appellant 

that when it resumed her wage-loss compensation it would offset the FERS portion.

3 The date of injury occurred during the weekend, appellant’s first missed day of work was December 13, 1999.

Appellantreturned to work on May 22, 2000 until her retirement in January 2003.
3

On June 20, 2019 appellant elected to receive FECA benefits retroactively to include a 

period during which benefits were paid by OPM effective July 8, 2017.4

On July 29, 2019 OWCP received a completed (FERS)/(SSA) dual benefits calculation 

form dated June 17, 2019 from SSA, which reported that appellant had been in receipt of SSA agerelated retirement benefits since July 2017. The form listed her SSA age-related retirement benefit 

rates with FERS and without FERS as follows: beginning July 2017, the monthly SSA rate with 

FERS was $1,241.40 and without FERS was $904.50; beginning December 2017, the monthly 

SSA rate with FERS was $1,266.20 and without FERS was $922.50; beginning December 2018,

the monthly SSA rate with FERS was $1,301.60 and without FERS was $948.30.

On April 9, 2020 OWCP determined that the surplus of $478,213.39 was absorbed during 

the period April 12, 2009 through July 5, 2017. It further deducted for dual benefit payment to 

OPM for July 8, 2017 through October 30, 2019 in the amount of $30,622.83 and authorized wageloss compensation beginning July 6, 2017.

In a letter dated April 15, 2020, appellant requested that OWCP deduct any SSA benefits 

from her ongoing wage-loss compensation to avoid an overpayment.

On August 4, 2020 OWCP received an additional completed (FERS)/(SSA) dual benefits 

calculation form from SSA dated July 18, 2020, which reported that appellant had been in receipt 

of SSA age-related retirement benefits and FECA benefits since July 2017. SSA reported that: 

beginning July 2017, the monthly SSA rate with FERS was $1,241.40 and without FERS was 

$520.50; beginning December 2017 the monthly SSA rate with FERS was $1,266.20 and without 

FERS was $530.90; beginning December 2018, the monthly SSA rate with FERS was $1,301.60

and without FERS was $545.70; beginningDecember 2019, the monthly SSA rate with FERS was 

$1,322.40 and without FERS was $554.40.

OWCP completed a FERS offset overpayment calculation worksheet on August 6, 2020. 

It determined the overpayment amount by multiplying the daily FERS offset amount by the 

number of days in each period from July 6, 2017 through July 18, 2020, resulted in a total 

overpayment of $27,428.36. OWCP related: from July 1 to November 30, 2017, appellant 

received an overpayment in the amount of $3,636.19; from December 1, 2017 through 

November 30, 2018, appellant received an overpayment in the amount of $8,847.84; from 

December 1, 2018 through November 30, 2019, appellant received an overpayment in the amount 

of $9,095.72; from December 1, 2019 through July 18, 2020, appellant received an overpayment 

in the amount of $5,848.62.

In an August 10, 2020 letter, OWCP informed appellant that she had been receiving dual 

FERS and SSA age-related retirement benefits without an appropriate offset. It further informed 

her that her FECA wage-loss compensation benefits must be adjusted based on the FERS portion 

4 On October 4, 2019 OPM provided OWCP with an estimate of $29,114.27 for the period from July 18, 2017 

through September 30, 2019. It requested the official effective date. On October 30, 2019 OPM noted that benefits 

were being paid on July 8, 2017, that FERS benefits were terminated as of October 30, 2019, and that appellant 

received dual benefits during the period July 8, 2017 through October 30, 2019 in the amount of $30,622.83. It 

repeated this request on January 16, 2020.
4

of SSA benefits that were attributable to federal service. OWCP indicated that appellant’s FECA 

benefits would be reduced beginning July 19, 2020 to the amount of $708.92 every 28 days.

On August 10, 2020 OWCP made a preliminary overpayment determination, finding that 

appellant received an overpayment of compensation in the amount of $27,428.36 for which she 

was at fault because her wage-loss compensation payments for the period July 6, 2017 through 

July 18, 2020 had not been reduced to offset her SSA age-related retirement benefits attributable 

to federal service. It determined that she was at fault in the creation of the overpayment as she 

failed to provide information which she knew or should have known, to be material. OWCP 

requested that she complete an overpayment recovery questionnaire (Form OWCP-20) and submit 

supporting financial documentation to determine a reasonable repayment schedule and advised 

that she could request waiver of recovery. It further requested that appellant provide supporting 

financial documentation, including copies of income tax returns, bank account statements, bills, 

pay slips, and any other records to support income and expenses. Additionally, OWCP notified 

her that within 30 days of the date of the letter, she could request a final decision based on the 

written record or a prerecoupment hearing. 

By decision dated September 15, 2020, OWCP found that appellant had received an 

overpayment in the amount of $27,428.36 for the period July 6, 2017 through July 18, 2020. It 

determined that appellant was at fault in the creation of the overpayment and denied waiver of 

recovery of the overpayment. OWCPrequired recovery of the overpayment by deducting $400.00 

every 28 days from appellant’s continuing compensation payments.

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 1

Section 8102(a) of FECA provides that the United States shall pay compensation for the 

disability or death of an employee resulting from personal injury sustained while in the 

performance of his or her duty.5 Section 8116 limits the right of an employee to receive 

compensation. While an employee is receiving compensation, he or she may not receive salary, 

pay, or remuneration of any type from the United States.6

Section 10.421(d) of OWCP’s implementing regulations requires OWCP to reduce the 

amount of compensation by the amount of any SSA age-related benefits that are attributable to the 

employee’s federal service.7 FECA Bulletin No. 97-09 provides that FECA benefits have to be 

adjusted for the FERS portion of SSA benefits because the portion of the SSA benefit earned as a 

federal employee is part of the FERS retirement package, and the receipt of FECA benefits and 

federal retirement concurrently is a prohibited dual benefit.

8

5

5 U.S.C. § 8102(a).

6

Id. at § 8116.

7

20 C.F.R. § 10.421(d); T.B., Docket No. 18-1449 (issued March19, 2019); S.M., Docket No. 17-1802 (issued 

August 20, 2018).

8 FECA Bulletin No. 97-09 (February 3, 1997); N.B., Docket No. 18-0795 (issued January 4, 2019).
5

To determine if an individual was at fault with respect to the creation of an overpayment, 

OWCP examines the circumstances surrounding the overpayment. The degree of care expected 

may vary with the complexity of those circumstances and the individual’s capacity to realize that 

he or she is being overpaid.9

When a claimant receives benefits from the SSA as part of an annuity under FERS 

concurrently with disability/wage-loss compensation, the claimant should be found without fault 

unless there is evidence on file that the claimant was aware that the receipt of full SSA age-related 

retirement benefits concurrent with disability/wage-loss compensation was prohibited.10

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 1

The Board finds the OWCP improperly determined that appellant received an overpayment 

of compensation in the amount of $27,428.36 for which she was at fault because she concurrently 

received FECA wage-loss compensation benefits and SSA age-related retirement benefits for the 

period July 6, 2017 through July 18, 2020 without an appropriate offset.

As previously noted, OWCP is required to reduce the amount of compensation by the 

amount of any SSA age-related retirement benefits that are attributable to the employee’s federal 

service.

11

 On July 29, 2019 and August 4, 2020 itreceived completed (FERS)/(SSA) dual benefits 

calculation formsfrom SSA, which reported that appellant had been in receipt of SSA age-related 

retirement benefits since July 2017. However, the (FERS)/(SSA) dual benefits calculation forms 

included varying rates for appellant’s SSA benefits without FERS. SSA reported that: beginning 

July 2017 appellant’s monthly SSA rate with FERS was $1,241.40 and without FERS was either 

$904.50 or $520.50; beginning December 2017 her monthly SSA rate with FERS was $1,266.20 

and without FERS was either $922.50 or $530.90; and beginning December 2018 her monthly 

SSA rate with FERS was $1,301.60 and without FERS was either $948.30 or $545.70. OWCP

applied the rate which resulted in the greater overpayment for appellant without requesting 

clarification from SSA.

The Board has held that, in overpayment cases, it is essential that OWCP provide the 

recipient of compensation with a clear statement showing how the overpayment was calculated.12 

With respect to the amount of the overpayment, the Board finds that OWCP has not adequately 

explained how the overpayment was determined in light of the discrepancies in the evidence 

provided by SSA as to the monthly SSA rate without FERS. As such, the Board is unable to verify 

the fact and amount of the overpayment of compensation in the amount of $27,428.36.

9 Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 6 -- Debt Management,Initial Determinations in an Overpayment, 

Chapter 6.300.4(d)(September 2018).

10 20 C.F.R. § 10.433(b); Id. at Chapter 6.300.4g(4) (September 2018).

11 20 C.F.R. § 10.421(d); S.H., Docket no. 20-1189 (issued January 27, 2021); J.R., Docket No. 17-0181 (issued 

August 12, 2020); L.W., Docket No. 19-0787 (issued October 23, 2019).

12 S.H., id.; R.E., Docket No. 19-1583 (issued May 27, 2020); J.M., Docket No. 18-1505 (issued June21, 2019);

Teresa A. Ripley, 56 ECAB 528 (2005).
6

Furthermore, as noted above, the Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual provides that, 

regarding an SSA dual benefits scenario, where the claimant receives SSA age-related retirement 

benefits as part of an annuity and wage-loss compensation under FECA, resulting in an

overpayment the claimant should be found without fault unless there is evidence on file that the 

claimant was aware that the receipt of full SSA age-related retirement benefits concurrent with 

disability/wage-loss compensation was prohibited.13 Because of the complex nature of SSA

benefits administration, appellant could not have been expected to be able to calculate the amount 

of an offset and OWCP had repeatedly assured her that it would make the calculation prior to 

reinstating her on the periodic rolls. Therefore, she could not reasonably have been aware during 

the relevant period that her concurrent receipt of SSA benefits constituted an actual prohibited dual 

benefit.14

As previously noted, to determine if an individual was at fault with respect to the creation 

of an overpayment, OWCP examines the circumstances surrounding the overpayment. The degree 

of care expected may vary with the complexity of those circumstances and the individual’s 

capacity to realize that he or she is being overpaid.15 Therefore, based on the circumstances 

described, the Board finds that OWCP has not met its burden of proof to establish that appellant 

was at fault in the creation of the overpayment for the period July 6, 2017 through July 18, 2020. 

As appellant was not at fault in the creation of the overpayment for the period July 6, 2017 through 

July 18, 2020, OWCP should consider the issue of waiver of recovery of the overpayment.16

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that OWCP improperly determined that appellant received an 

overpayment of compensation in the amount of $27,428.36 for which she was at fault because she 

concurrently received FECA wage-loss compensation benefits and SSA age-related retirement 

benefits for the period July 6, 2017 through July 18, 2020 without an appropriate offset.

13 Supra note 8; H.H.,Docket No. 18-0674 (issued September 3, 2020).

14 D.G., Docket No. 19-0684 (issued December 24, 2019) (the Board affirmed OWCP’s finding that, due to the 

complexity of SSAage-related retirement benefits administration, appellant was not with fault in the creation of the

overpayment because he could not have reasonably known that an improper payment had occurred. OWCP 

determined that appellant was not expected to be able to calculate the amount of the offset.).

15 Supra note 8.

16 In light of the Board’s findings with regard to Issue 1, the remaining issues are rendered moot.
7

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the September 15, 2020 decision of the Office of 

Workers’ Compensation Programs is reversed. 

Issued: October 20, 2022

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board