alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
   ZiLOG, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-108372, No. 333-114501, and No. 333-114503) on
Form S-8 of ZiLOG, Inc., of our report dated June 23, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of ZiLOG, Inc., as of March 31, 2008
and March 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended March 31, 2008, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the March 31, 2008 annual report
on Form 10-K of ZiLOG, Inc.

ARMANINO MCKENNA LLP

San Ramon, California
   June 23, 2008

---
# L_2007333EN.01006101.xml

| 19.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 333/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 333/61

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1503/2007

of 18 December 2007

on the issuing of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of December 2007 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 979/2007 for pigmeat

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in pigmeat (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 979/2007 of 21 August 2007 opening and providing for the administration of an import tariff quota for pigmeat originating in Canada (2), and in particular Article 5(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 979/2007 opened import tariff quotas for pigmeat products. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 979/2007 opened import tariff quotas for pigmeat products.

| (2) | The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of December 2007 for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2008 do not cover the total quantity available. The quantities for which applications have not been lodged should therefore be determined and these should be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of December 2007 for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2008 do not cover the total quantity available. The quantities for which applications have not been lodged should therefore be determined and these should be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities for which import licence applications under quota 09.4204 have not been lodged under Regulation (EC) No 979/2007, to be added to the subperiod 1 April to 30 June 2008, are 3 468 000 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 December 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 December 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 217, 22.8.2007, p. 12. Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 will be replaced by Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1) as from 1 July 2008.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND CASH FLOWS
AND ACCOMPANYING NOTES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,568
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  165,572
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,552
<INVENTORY>                                    269,622
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               498,830
<PP&E>                                         362,453
<DEPRECIATION>                                 143,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 842,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          316,697
<BONDS>                                        178,769
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,184
<OTHER-SE>                                     293,064
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   842,982
<SALES>                                      1,296,399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,296,399
<CGS>                                        1,114,410
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,114,410
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                80,758
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   183
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,949
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,341
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,802
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,539
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,539
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

T.B., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, 

New Orleans, LA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0599

Issued: May 3, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Clarence Roby, Jr., Esq., for the appellant1

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On March 7, 2023 appellant, through counsel, filed an appeal from a July 13, 2021

decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the 

Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 23-0599.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act.

2

 This jurisdiction encompasses any final adverse decision issued by OWCP within 180 

days of the date appellant filed his or her appeal.

3

 The case record as transmitted to the Board 

does not contain a final adverse decision of OWCP issued within 180 days from the date of 

1

In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for 

legal or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 

20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board.

Id. An attorney or representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, 

subject to fine or imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of 

fees to a representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation.

2

5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

3

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the 

date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.”
2

docketing of the current appeal.4 Although the record contains a July 13, 2021 decision, by that 

decision OWCP accepted appellant’s claim for various conditions. As there is no final adverse 

decision issued by OWCP over which the Board may properly exercise jurisdiction, the Board 

concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 23-0599 must be dismissed.5 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-0599 is dismissed.

Issued: May 3, 2023

Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

4

Id.

5 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id. 

at § 501.6(d).
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Grey Wolf, Inc:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Nos.
33-34590, 33-75338 and 333-19027 of Grey Wolf, Inc. on Form S-8 and Registration
Statements Nos. 333-14783, 333-6077, 333-2043, 333-36593 and 333-39683 of Grey
Wolf, Inc. on Form S-3, of our report dated February 16, 1999, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Grey Wolf, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December
31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders' equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, and the related
financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 1998
annual report on Form 10-K of Grey Wolf, Inc.


                                    KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
March 16, 1999
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the
undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Mark Buller                      
|                   |  |  |  | Mark Buller  Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings,
L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 214 (Monday, November 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 67457]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22247]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE AGREEMENTS


Extension of Period of Determination on Request for Textile and 
Apparel Safeguard Action on Imports from China

November 2, 2005.
AGENCY: The Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements (the 
Committee).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is extending through November 8, 2005, the 
period for making a determination on whether to request consultations 
with China regarding imports of cotton and man-made fiber nightwear 
(Category 351/651).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay Dowling, Office of Textiles and 
Apparel, U.S. Department of Commerce, (202) 482-4058.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Authority: Section 204 of the Agriculture Act of 1956, as 
amended; Executive Order 11651, as amended.

Background:

    On July 11, 2005, the Committee received a request from the 
American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition, the National Council of 
Textile Organizations, the National Textile Association, and UNITE HERE 
requesting that the Committee limit imports from China of cotton and 
man-made fiber nightwear (Category 351/651) due to market disruption.
    The Committee determined that this request provided the information 
necessary for the Committee to consider the request and solicited 
public comments for a period of 30 days. See Solicitation of Public 
Comments on Request for Textile and Apparel Safeguard Action on Imports 
from China, 70 FR 44568 (August 3, 2005).
    The Committee's Procedures, 68 FR 27787 (May 21, 2003) state that 
the Committee will make a determination within 60 calendar days of the 
close of the public comment period as to whether the United States will 
request consultations with China. If the Committee is unable to make a 
determination within 60 calendar days, it will cause to be published a 
notice in the Federal Register, including the date by which it will 
make a determination.
    The 60-day determination period for this case expired on November 
1, 2005. However, the Committee decided to extend until November 8, 
2005, the period for making a determination on this case because of 
consultations with the Government of China on a broader agreement on 
textiles.

James C. Leonard III,
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements.
[FR Doc.05-22247 Filed 11-3-05; 2:22 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
# National Family Caregivers Month, 2005

Each November, as Americans reflect on our many blessings, we observe National Family Caregivers Month and give thanks for the selfless service of family caregivers on behalf of their loved ones in need. The tireless devotion of these Americans brings comfort and peace of mind to our Nation's elderly and to those who are chronically ill or disabled.

Family caregivers play an important role in communities across the United States. They provide most of the homecare services in our country and work hard to meet the emotional and physical needs of the family members and friends for whom they care. Through the National Family Caregiver Support Program, my Administration continues to encourage States and local agencies on aging to partner with faith-based, community, and tribal organizations. These partnerships can offer family caregivers the important information, counseling, training, respite care, and support services they need.

This November, enrollment begins under the new Medicare prescription drug benefit, which offers more affordable access to prescription drugs, better health care choices, and extra help to low-income seniors and beneficiaries with disabilities. This new coverage will help family caregivers, who often inform or make medical decisions for those they care for, by ensuring that their loved ones receive the best health care available.

Every day, family caregivers sacrifice their own needs to offer their loved ones the opportunity to live with dignity and independence in familiar surroundings. Their love, selflessness, and devotion inspire us all and demonstrate the compassionate spirit of America.

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim November 2005 as National Family Caregivers Month. I encourage all Americans to honor and support those who serve as caregivers to their family members, friends, and neighbors in need.                          ( print page 67638)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this second day of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth.

[FR Doc. 05-22297

Billing code 3195-01-P
#### IN RE WILL OF BAKER

No. 10 PC.

Case below: 5 N.C. App. 224.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 29 August 1969.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                0000052466
<NAME>                        Exhibit 27
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         19,344
<SECURITIES>                                   376
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,303
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,839)
<INVENTORY>                                    39,464
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               220,492
<PP&E>                                         416,480
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (182,527)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 537,246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          129,922
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       16,220
<OTHER-SE>                                     350,320
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   537,246
<SALES>                                        205,599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               205,599
<CGS>                                          142,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  142,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,261
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,926
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,184
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,134
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            7,777
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   7,777
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .47



</TABLE>
# L_2007253EN.01001301.xml

| 28.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 253/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 253/13

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1113/2007

of 27 September 2007

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 900/2007

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 of 27 July 2007 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2007/2008 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 of 27 July 2007 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2007/2008 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 27 September 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 27 September 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 27 September 2007, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 shall be 39,069 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 September 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 September 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 247/2007 (OJ L 69, 9.3.2007, p. 3).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 196, 28.7.2007, p. 26.

2

---
#### STATE OF NEVADA, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, Appellant, v. ANN WILLIAMS STONE, Respondent.

No. 11213

December 20, 1978

587 P.2d 1325

*Robert List,*Attorney General, and *Bryan M. Nelson,*Deputy Attorney General, Carson City, for Appellant.

*W. H. Tobeler,*Reno, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

This appeal is from a judgment entered September 5, 1978, reversing the decision of a Hearing Officer for the Department of Motor Vehicles. The Hearing Officer had determined that the refusal of Ann Williams Stone to submit to a breathalyzer machine test violated Nevada’s Implied Consent Law. Stone’s driving privileges were ordered suspended for a period of six (6) months.

Appellant, alleging unexplained and unexcused procedural derelictions by respondent has filed, and served on respondent, *776a “motion to reverse [the district court’s] judgment.” In support of the motion, appellant argues respondent’s failure to comply with the Appellate Rules should be treated as a confession of error under NRAP 31(c), and our decision in Kitchen Factors, Inc. v. Brown, 91 Nev. 308, 535 P.2d 677 (1975). We agree.

In addition to respondent’s previous omissions, she has neither opposed the motion to reverse, nor tendered any reason for her failure to do so. Under these circumstances, we elect to treat respondent’s conduct as a confession of error. *See*Kitchen Factors, Inc. v. Brown, cited above.

The judgment in respondent’s favor is reversed and the district court is instructed to dismiss, with prejudice, the “petition for review of order of suspension,” Ann Williams Stone filed in the district court May 22, 1978.