alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND CASH FLOWS
AND ACCOMPANYING NOTES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                          14,201
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  139,425
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,949
<INVENTORY>                                    253,637
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               468,951
<PP&E>                                         336,580
<DEPRECIATION>                                 110,934
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 832,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          321,505
<BONDS>                                        162,325
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,184    
<OTHER-SE>                                     296,807
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   832,247
<SALES>                                      1,887,992
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,887,992
<CGS>                                        1,591,763
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,591,763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               122,269
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,810
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,005
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,662
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,343
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,343
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Otelco Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Curtis L. Garner, Jr., Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to my
      knowledge:




1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.


/s/
                  Curtis L. Garner, Jr.Curtis
                  L. Garner, Jr.Chief
                  Financial OfficerAugust
                  8, 2008
#### ISLAND PERIODICALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Anthony P. OLIVE, Director of the Bureau of Internal Revenue, an Agency of the Government of the Virgin Islands, Defendant.

Civ. No. 88-98.

District Court, Virgin Islands, D. St. Thomas and St. John.

April 25, 1991.

Kevin P. Sweeny, St. Thomas, V.I., for plaintiff.

Gerald Sims, Asst. Atty. Gen. of the Virgin Islands, Dept, of Justice, St. Thomas, V.I., for defendant.

ORDER

GILES, District Judge, Sitting by Designation.

AND NOW this 24th day of April, 1991 it is hereby ORDERED that upon consideration of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and defendant’s response thereto, plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED for the reasons that follow.

*12351. The parties have stipulated to the following facts. Defendant has been imposing excise taxes on paperback books that plaintiff imports into the Virgin Islands. Plaintiff has been paying these taxes but prior to commencement of this action told defendant that it did not believe the taxes were properly imposed. Plaintiff argues that they are “permanently bound volumes” exempted from the tax under V.I.Code Ann. tit. 33, § 42(e). Defendant disagrees and states that paperbacks have limited endurance and a shorter longevity than hard backs.

2. Resolving this case requires interpretation of the meaning of “permanently bound volumes” as termed in V.I.Code Ann. tit. 33, § 42(e). This court must look to the plain meaning of the statute. If the meaning is susceptible to more than one interpretation, the court must look to the legislative history of the statute.

3. Here, the language is unambiguous. Its plain meaning exempts permanently bound volumes of reading material containing no advertisements from the excise tax. Defendant does not argue that the books are not bound volumes, or that they contain advertisements but rather that because they are paperback, they will not survive as long as hard cover. However, this interpretation is unreasonable and tortures the language of the statute. Defendant admits that “permanent” means “lasting or intended to last indefinitely without change.” Paperbacks also may last indefinitely without change. That they may not last as long as hard covers cannot be decisive. The statute does not define “permanent” as hard covers, nor does it distinguish between hard cover and paperback volumes. Defendant has provided no evidence to support a finding that the language is ambiguous or that the legislature intended the interpretation adopted in this case.

4. Accordingly, Judgment is hereby entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant.
## UNITED STATES ARMY COUR T OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Before COOK, GALLAGHER, and HAIGHT Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES, Appellee

v. Specialist EVAN R. BROWN United States Army, Appellant

ARMY 20100022

Headquarters, Maneuver Suppo rt Center of Excellence Charles D. Hayes Jr., Military Judge Colonel Steven E. Walburn, St aff Judge Advoca te (pretrial)

Lieutenant Colonel Michael A. Cres sler, Acting Sta ff Judge Advocate (recommendation) Colonel James R. Agar, II, Staff Judge Advo cate (addendum)

For Appellant: Mr. Timoth y Mudd, Esquire (argued); Ca ptain Jennifer A. Parker, JA; Mr. Timothy Mudd, Esquir e (on brief); Captain E. Patrick Gilman, JA; Mr. Timothy Mudd, Esquire ( on reply brief); Major Ri chard E. Gorini, JA.

For Appellee: Captain Sasha N. Rutizer, JA (argued); Major Amber J. Williams, JA; Major LaJohnne A. White, JA ; Captain Julie A. Glasco tt, JA (on brief); Major Robert A. Rodrigues, JA.

28 September 2012

---------------------------------- SUMMARY DISPOSITION

----------------------------------

Per Curiam:

A panel of enlisted and officer members, s itting as a genera l court-martial, convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of four specifications of indecent acts in violation of Article 120, Unif orm Code of Militar y Justice, 10 U.S. C. § 920 (2006 & Supp. II 2008) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority appr oved the adjudged

sentence to a di shonorable discharge, co nfinement for 181 days, fo rfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reducti on to the grad e of E-1.BROWN

— ARMY 20100022

2 The convening authority approved appellant’s request for deferment of automatic and adjudged forfeitures until act ion. At action, the convening authority waived appellant’s automatic forfeitures fo r a six-month period, with direction that they be paid to appellant’s spouse. Ho wever, the convening authority failed to disapprove the adjudged forfeitures, thus leaving no pay and allowanc es to waive for the benefit of appellant’s spouse . Therefore, in order to effectuate the clear intent of the convening authority and in the spirit of judicial economy, we set aside that portion of the sentence th at included forfeiture of all pay and allowances.

On consideration of the entire record, the argumen ts of the par ties, and the matters personally raised by appellant pursuant to United States v. Grostefon , 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), we find appella nt’s arguments to be without merit.  The findings of guilty are affirm ed. The portion of the sentence that included forfeiture of all pay and allowances is hereby set aside. The re mainder of the sentence is affirmed. All rights, privil eges, and property, of which appellant was deprived by virtue of that portion of his sentence be ing set aside by this decision, are hereby

ordered restored. See UCMJ arts. 58(b), 75(a).

FOR THE COURT:

MALCOLM H. SQUIRES JR.

Clerk of Court

 Additionally, we find th e military judge did not impermissibly exclude constitutionally required evidence. See United States v. Gaddis , 70 M.J. 248 (C.A.A.F. 2011). MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR.

Clerk of Court FOR THE COURT:
EXHIBIT 32.1 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

The undersigned, Wayne P. Garten, President  of Hanover Direct, Inc. (the “Company”),  hereby certifies that to his knowledge the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period specified. 

 

Signed at the City of Weehawken, in the State of New Jersey, this 31st day of March, 2006. 

 

/s/ Wayne P. Garten

Wayne P. Garten

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                        1,388,845
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        21,605,442
<DEPRECIATION>                11,022,393
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                12,494,742
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         456,044
<BONDS>                       9,830,261
<COMMON>                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    2,208,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  12,494,742
<SALES>                       3,196,975
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              3,299,487
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 1,520,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              946,415
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            840,832
<INCOME-PRETAX>              (8,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                 (8,210)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                (.10)


</TABLE>
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00090-CV

Eliazar RUIZ and G.E.M. Materials, Inc.,

Appellants

v.

Madeline YORFINO, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joseph R.

Yorfino, Sr., Deceased, Joseph R. Yorfino, Jr., Individually, Stella Duffy, Individually, and

Henrietta S. Guerra, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Daniel Guerra, Jr.,

Deceased, and Brandi N. Guerra, Jonathan S. Guerra, and Christopher E. Guerra,

Appellees

Henrietta S. Guerra, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Daniel Guerra, Jr.,

Deceased, and Brandi N. Guerra, Jonathan S. Guerra, and Christopher E. Guerra,

Cross-Appellants

 v.

Sterling Truck Corporation,

Cross-Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2004-CI-18420

Honorable Andy Mireles, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 20, 2009

DISMISSED IN PART
-2-

04-08-00090-CV

Appellants have filed a motion for partial dismissal of appeal, in which they assert that they

have entered into an agreement with appellees Madeline Yorfino, Individually and as Personal

Representative of the Estate of Joseph R. Yorfino, Sr., Deceased, Joseph Yorfino, Jr., Individually,

and Stella Duffy, Individually to resolve all claims and causes of actions pending between them in

this case. Appellants ask this court to dismiss their appeal as to their claims against appellees

Madeline Yorfino, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joseph R. Yorfino,

Sr., Deceased, Joseph Yorfino, Jr., Individually, and Stella Duffy, Individually. 

The motion is granted, and we dismiss appellees Madeline Yorfino, Individually and as

Personal Representative of the Estate of Joseph R. Yorfino, Sr., Deceased, Joseph Yorfino, Jr.,

Individually, and Stella Duffy, Individually. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(b), 43.2(f). This case shall

hereafter be styled “Eliazar Ruiz and G.E.M. Materials, Inc. v. Henrietta S. Guerra, Individually and

as Representative of the Estate of Daniel Guerra, Jr., Deceased, and Brandi N. Guerra, Jonathan

S. Guerra, and Christopher E. Guerra.” Cross-appellants’ claims against Sterling Truck

Corporation are also still pending before this court.

Appellants Eliazar Ruiz and G.E.M. Materials, Inc. shall pay all costs of this appeal relative

to appellees Madeline Yorfino, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joseph

R. Yorfino, Sr., Deceased, Joseph Yorfino, Jr., Individually, and Stella Duffy, Individually. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.1(d). 

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wisconsin Power and Light Company (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ William D. Harvey

William D. Harvey

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

/s/ Eliot G. Protsch

Eliot G. Protsch

Chief Financial Officer

 

November 2, 2007
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Strategic Internet
Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"). I, Abbas Salih, Chief Financial Officer of the
company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



|Date: | November 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Abbas Salih           
|----- | ----------------- |  | --------------------------
|      |                   |  | Abbas Salih, CFO, Director

---
#### JOE LOUIS McCULLOUGH, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 9728

January 30, 1978

574 P.2d 585

*52
      *William N. Dunseath,*Public Defender, and *Michael B. McDonald,*Deputy Public Defender, Washoe County, for Appellant.

*Larry R. Hicks,*District Attorney, and *John L. Connor,*Assistant Chief Deputy District Attorney, Washoe County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Upon his plea of guilty to the crime of attempted burglary, the appellant was sentenced to serve a term of four years in prison. He now complains that the court should have inquired into his competency to enter a guilty plea since he had only an eighth grade education; that he had been promised probation by someone; and, in any event, the sentence imposed is too severe.

His contentions are before us because of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Sanchez v. State, 85 Nev. 95, 450 P.2d 793 (1969), and counsel for appellant has filed with us his affidavit of “no merit appeal.” Our independent review of the record reveals that this appeal is frivolous.

Authority is not cited for the proposition that an accused with only an eighth grade education is to be presumed incompetent to knowingly and intelligently plead guilty, nor are we aware of any such authority. There was nothing presented to the district court to suggest incompetency.

Neither does the record hint a promise of probation. To the contrary, it is clear that the appellant knew that the matter of sentence rested exclusively with the court.

The sentence imposed was within statutory authorization, NRS 205.060, 208.070. Cf. Carter v. State, 84 Nev. 592, 446 P.2d 165 (1968). The fact that the sentence imposed by the *53court exceeded the sentence recommended by the Department of Parole and Probation is of no consequence. Collins v. State, 88 Nev. 168, 494 P.2d 956 (1972). The victim of the attempted burglary was a 72-year-old woman whom the appellant admitted striking. She suffered injuries and was hospitalized. This alone may have persuaded the court to impose a more severe sentence than recommended by the department.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 216 (Wednesday, November 9, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 68076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22187]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WO-260-09-1060-00-24 1A]


Correction to Notice of Call for Nominations for the Wild Horse 
and Burro Advisory Board

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Corrections to Notice of Call for Nominations for the Wild 
Horse and Burro Advisory Board. This notice was previously published in 
the Federal Register: Vol. 70, No. 193/Tuesday, October 6, 2005.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Register Notice has an incorrect date for 
nominations to be submitted to the National Wild Horse and Burro 
Advisory Board. The corrected notice extends the date to November 30, 
2005. The nominations should be submitted to the National Wild Horse 
and Burro Program, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Interior, 
P.O. Box 12000, Reno, Nevada 89520-0006, Attn: Ramona DeLorme: fax 
(775) 861-6711.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jeff Rawson, Group Manager, Wild 
Horse and Burro Group, (202) 452-0379. Individuals who use a 
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may reach Ms. DeLorme at 
any time by calling the Federal Information Relay Service at 1 (800) 
877-8339.

    Dated: October 25, 2005.
Thomas H. Dyer,
Deputy Assistant Director, Renewable Resources and Planning.
[FR Doc. 05-22187 Filed 11-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-P
#### ARTIS v. WOLFE

No. 110 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 227.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 21 December 1976.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Earle M. Jorgensen Company (EMJ) for the period ended December 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Maurice S. Nelson, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of EMJ, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) Information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of EMJ.



Date: February 10, 2006



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|/S/ MAURICE S. NELSON, JR.                    
|Maurice S. Nelson, Jr. Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EMJ and will be retained by EMJ and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          36,943
<SECURITIES>                                    26,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,829
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,397)
<INVENTORY>                                     39,620
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,033
<PP&E>                                          57,327
<DEPRECIATION>                                (24,720)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 207,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,967
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,016
<OTHER-SE>                                     141,275
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   207,522
<SALES>                                         98,990
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                98,990
<CGS>                                           76,971
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,908
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   581
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (74,254)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (25,430)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (48,824)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  26,746
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,078)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.84)
        

</TABLE>