alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET, STATEMETNS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS
AND ACCOMPANYING NOTES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIREETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMETNS AND NOTES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,118
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  173,863
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,518
<INVENTORY>                                    305,682
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               549,034
<PP&E>                                         368,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                 148,156
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 890,178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          350,352
<BONDS>                                        178,001
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,184
<OTHER-SE>                                     305,723
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   890,178
<SALES>                                      1,973,202
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,973,202
<CGS>                                        1,689,833
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,689,833
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               123,827
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    94
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,317
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,367
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,950
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,950
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# L_2012310DE.01005201.xml

| 9.11.2012 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 310/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2012

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 310/52

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 864/2007 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 11. Juli 2007 über das auf außervertragliche Schuldverhältnisse anzuwendende Recht („Rom II“)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 199 vom 31. Juli 2007
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 199 vom 31. Juli 2007

Seite 41, Erwägungsgrund 17 zweiter Satz:

anstatt:

„Daher sollte auch bei Personen- oder Sachschäden als Staat, in dem der Schaden eintritt, der Staat gelten, in dem der Personen- oder Sachschaden tatsächlich eingetreten ist.“

muss es heißen:

„Daher sollte bei Personen- oder Sachschäden der Staat, in dem der Schaden eintritt, der Staat sein, in dem die Verletzung erlitten beziehungsweise die Sache beschädigt wurde.“

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-4980-N-45]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

November 10, 2005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration*, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: November 3, 2005.

Mark R. Johnston,

Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.

[FR Doc. 05-22265  Filed 11-9-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
#### Ambrocio Abundez HUERTA, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-74248.

Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 2005.**

Decided April 11, 2005.

Ambrocio Abundez Huerta, Bell, CA, pro se.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Linda S. Wendtland, Esq., Shelley R. Goad, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before B. FLETCHER, TROTT and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Ambrocio Abundez Huerta, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“U”) denial of his application for cancellation of removal. We have partial jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and we review constitutional issues de novo, *see Ram v. INS,*243 F.3d 510 (9th Cir.2001). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review Abundez Huerta’s contention that the Department of Homeland Security (formerly the Immigration & Naturalization Service) should have commenced proceedings against him prior to April 1, 1997, so that petitioner could apply for suspension of deportation rather than cancellation of removal. *See Jimenez-Angeles v. Ashcroft,*291 F.3d 594, 599 (9th Cir.2002) (‘We construed [8 *890U.S.C. § 1252(g) ], which removes our jurisdiction over “deeision[s] ... to commence proceedings” to include not only a decision in an individual case *whether*to commence, but also *when*to commence, a proceeding.) (emphasis in original).

We are unpersuaded by Abundez Huerta’s contention that it is a violation of equal protection to treat aliens who met the seven-year residency requirement prior to April 1, 1997 differently, based on whether proceedings were commenced against the alien before or after that date. *See Hernandez-Mezquita v. Ashcroft,*293 F.3d 1161, 1163-65 (noting that Congress must go through a natural line drawing process and holding that the establishment of deadlines serves a rational evidentiary purpose).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>
                                                       Exhibit 23


Consent of Independent Accountants




The Board of Directors and Shareholders
  of The Advest Group, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
The Advest Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No. 2-92868)
concerning its 1983 Incentive Stock Option Plan, Form S-8 (File No. 33-17674)
concerning its 1986 Incentive Stock Option Plan, Form S-8 (File No. 33-72042)
concerning its Advest Thrift Plan and Form S-8 (File No. 33-56275) concerning
its 1995 Equity Plan, Form S-8 (File No. 333-00797) concerning its Executive
Officier 1996 Restricted Stock and Stock Option Agreement and Form S-8 (File
No. 333-17711) concerning its Key Professionals Equity Plan, 1996 Executive
Equity Plan, 1997 Executive Equity Plan and 1997 Equity Plan,of our reports
dated October 23, 1996, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements
and financial statement schedules of The Advest Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as
of September 30, 1996 and 1995 and for the years ended September 30, 1996, 1995
and 1994, which reports are incorporated by reference and included,
respectively, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.






                          /s/COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.







Hartford, Connecticut
December 20, 1996

                                       -58-
# L_2007260EN.01000301.xml

| 5.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 260/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 260/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1164/2007

of 4 October 2007

entering a designation in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Holsteiner Karpfen (PGI))

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 and Article 17(2) thereof, the application submitted by Germany to enter the designation ‘Holsteiner Karpfen’ in the register was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 and Article 17(2) thereof, the application submitted by Germany to enter the designation ‘Holsteiner Karpfen’ in the register was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | A statement of objection was notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006. As this statement of objection was subsequently withdrawn, this designation must therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A statement of objection was notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006. As this statement of objection was subsequently withdrawn, this designation must therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The designation contained in the Annex to this Regulation shall be entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 October 2007.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1791/2006 (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ C 306, 15.12.2006, p. 9.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

| Class 1.7. | Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom |
| --- | --- |

Class 1.7.

Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom

GERMANY

Holsteiner Karpfen (PGI)

---
EXHIBIT 12(b)


COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF INCOME TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
AND PREFERRED SHARE DIVIDENDS
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES




				                                               Years Ended


(millions, except ratios)			                  			1996     			1995

Fixed Charges:
  Interest and amortization
  of debt discount
  and expense on all indebtedness		            	$1,365		     $1,373

  Add interest element
   implicit in rentals				                    		   121	     	   119
			                                          			 1,486     	  1,492
  Preferred dividend factor			               			    41     		    89
  Interest capitalized						                         5     		     4

Total fixed charges                       						$1,532     		$1,585

Income:
  Income from continuing operations          			$1,271     		$1,025
  Deduct undistributed net income (loss)
   of unconsolidated companies				                  	8	    	      9
                                         							 1,263     		 1,016
Add
  Fixed charges (excluding
    interest capitalized
    and preferred dividend factor)          			  1,486     		 1,492
  Income taxes                           						    834	     	   703
       Income before fixed charges and
         Income taxes				                    		 $3,583     		$3,211

Ratio of income to combined fixed charges
  and preferred share dividends             				  2.34	     	  2.03

(A) In 1996 all the outstanding 8.88% Preferred Shares,
     First Series were redeemed and thereafter the
  Company made no other preferred dividend payments.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES F-2 THROUGH F-4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         182,214
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,234,402
<ALLOWANCES>                                   478,553
<INVENTORY>                                    758,116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,789,571
<PP&E>                                      10,003,035
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,985,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,397,850
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,147,807
<BONDS>                                      4,515,371
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,089,638
<COMMON>                                       139,007
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,612,403)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,397,850
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,169,314
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,250,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               253,368
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             774,671
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,158,586)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,158,586)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,158,586)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. ARTIS

No. 117 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 193.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 21 December 1976.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 8, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00449

- CR

Eugene TIDWELL, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexa r County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR4975 Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s court

- appointed appellate attorney filed an Anders brief in this appeal. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel advised appellant of his right to review the record and file his own brief, and explained to appellant the procedur e for obtaining the record. See Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Appellant, who is incarcerated, has filed a motion to obtain a copy of the record.

Appellant’s motion for access to the appellate record is g ranted. We order the clerk of this court to send appellant, pro se, a copy of the record. We further order appellant’s pro se brief is due December 23, 2016

. Appellant is advised that no extensions of time to file the pro se brief will b e granted absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Cha pa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 8th day of November, 2016

.___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 10.39











January 2, 2015





Catherine M. Vaczy, Esq.


140 East 28 th Street


#11C


New York, NY  10106


Dear Catherine:


This letter serves as an amendment (the “Amendment”) to  your employment agreement dated as of January 26, 2007 (the “2007 Agreement”), as thereafter amended by amendments on January 9, 2008, August 29, 2008,  reinstated and extended on July 8, 2009, extended on July 7, 2010, extended on January 6, 2012, extended on  November 12, 2012, extended on July 12, 2013, amended on March 11, 2014 and amended on August 4, 2014 and further extended on October 27, 2014 (the 2007 Agreement as so amended and extended, the “Original Agreement”) with respect to your service to the Company as its General Counsel.  This Extension shall become effective (the “Effective Date”) as of January 1, 2015 and shall modify the Original Agreement with respect to those different and additional terms as set forth below.


|   |                                                                    
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | Your Base Salary shall be a minimum of $310,800, reviewed annually.

NeoStem, Inc.


By:/s/ Robin L. Smith


Name:Robin L. Smith


Title: CEO


ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:


/s/ Catherine M. Vaczy


Catherine M. Vaczy
EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-107438, 333-144265, 333-162733, and 333-159282 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-145988 and 333-166169 on Form S-3 of our report dated April 5, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of NeoStem, Inc. and subsidiaries appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of NeoStem, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010. /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP   Parsippany, New Jersey April 5, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 214 (Monday, November 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67457-67458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22248]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE AGREEMENTS


Extension of Period of Determination on Request for Textile and 
Apparel Safeguard Action on Imports from China

November 2, 2005.
AGENCY: The Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements (the 
Committee).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is extending through November 8, 2005, the 
period for making a determination on whether to request consultations 
with China regarding imports of cotton and man-made fiber swimwear 
(Category 359-S/659-S).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay Dowling, Office of Textiles and 
Apparel, U.S. Department of Commerce, (202) 482-4058.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Authority: Section 204 of the Agriculture Act of 1956, as 
amended; Executive Order 11651, as amended.

Background:

    On July 11, 2005, the Committee received a request from the 
American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition, the National Council of 
Textile Organizations, the National Textile Association, and UNITE HERE 
requesting that the Committee limit imports from China of cotton and 
man-made fiber swimwear (Category 359-S/659-S) due to market 
disruption.
    The Committee determined that this request provided the information 
necessary for the Committee to consider the request and solicited 
public comments for a period of 30 days. See Solicitation of Public 
Comments on Request for Textile and Apparel

[[Page 67458]]

Safeguard Action on Imports from China, 70 FR 44568 (August 3, 2005).
    The Committee's Procedures, 68 FR 27787 (May 21, 2003) state that 
the Committee will make a determination within 60 calendar days of the 
close of the public comment period as to whether the United States will 
request consultations with China. If the Committee is unable to make a 
determination within 60 calendar days, it will cause to be published a 
notice in the Federal Register, including the date by which it will 
make a determination.
    The 60-day determination period for this case expired on November 
1, 2005. However, the Committee decided to extend until November 8, 
2005, the period for making a determination on this case because of 
consultations with the Government of China on a broader agreement on 
textiles.

James C. Leonard III,
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements.
[FR Doc.05-22248 Filed 11-3-05; 2:22 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS