alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF**

**TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Navistar Financial Corporation (the "Corporation"), subsidiary of International Truck and Engine Corporation, on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Pamela Turbeville, Principal Executive Officer and I, Andrew J. Cederoth, Principal Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 
| /s/ Pamela Turbeville |
|-----------------------|

Pamela Turbeville

Principal Executive Officer

June 9, 2005

 

 
| /s/ Andrew J. Cederoth |
|------------------------|

Andrew J. Cederoth

Principal Financial Officer

June 9, 2005

 

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Corporation for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This certification shall also not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Corporation specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

 

**E-16**
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-30922

 

JULIO C. ARANA

Plaintiff-Appellee

versus

OCHSNER HEALTH PLAN

Defendant-Appellant

- - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Louisiana

- - - - -

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion August 15, 2002, 5 Cir., 2002, _____F.3d____)

January 16, 2003

BEFORE: KING, Chief Judge, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES,

SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS,

BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested

a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of

the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a

rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the

court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. 

The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of

supplemental briefs.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 25, 2011 

y0322 

Order 

 

March 25, 2011 

141932 & (62)(65) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141932 

 COA: 294054 

Livingston CC: 08-017643-FC 

JEROME WALTER KOWALSKI, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the August 26, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals 

is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be 

briefed: (1) whether the defendant’s proffered expert testimony regarding the existence 

of false confessions, and the interrogation techniques and psychological factors that tend 

to generate false confessions, is admissible under MRE 702; (2) whether the probative 

value of the proffered expert testimony is substantially outweighed by the danger of 

unfair prejudice; and (3) whether the Livingston Circuit Court’s order excluding the 

defendant’s proffered expert testimony denies the defendant his constitutional right to 

present a defense. 

 The motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The Criminal 

Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan 

are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the 

determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to 

file briefs amicus curiae.
**Exhibit 32.1**
**STATEMENT**
     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. 1350,the undersigned officer of Mercury Air Group, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies that to the knowledge of the undersigned:
  (1) The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three monthperiod ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements ofsections 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, and
  (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.   /s/ Joseph Czyzyk Joseph Czyzyk*Chief Executive Officer and Director*
November 12, 2004
30
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned officers of W&T Offshore, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |                                                   
|----------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 5, 2010 |  | /S/ TRACY W. KROHN                                
|                  |  | Tracy W. Krohn                                    
|                  |  | Chief Executive Officer                           
|                  | 
|Date: May 5, 2010 |  | /S/ JOHN D. GIBBONS                               
|                  |  | John D. Gibbons                                   
|                  |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
|                  |  | Chief Accounting Officer
#### HOUSING AUTHORITY v. FARABEE

No. 38 PC.

Case below: 17 N.C. App. 431.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 30 April 1973.
66422 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 211 / Wednesday, November 2, 2005 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 05–21794 Filed 11–1–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6725–01–C 

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

Notice of Agreements Filed 

The Commission hereby gives notice 

of the filing of the following agreements 

under the Shipping Act of 1984. 

Interested parties may submit comments 

on an agreement to the Secretary, 

Federal Maritime Commission, 

Washington, DC 20573, within ten days 

of the date this notice appears in the 

Federal Register. Copies of agreements 

are available through the Commission’s 

Office of Agreements (202–523–5793 or 

tradeanalysis@fmc.gov). 

Agreement No.: 009831–023. 

Title: New Zealand/United States 

Container Lines Association. 

Parties: Australia-New Zealand Direct 

Line; CP Ships USA, LLC; and 

Hamburg-Sud. 

Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; 

Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M Street 

NW.; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036. 

Synopsis: The amendment removes 

P&O Nedlloyd Limited as a party to the 

agreement. 

Agreement No.: 011834–002. 

Title: Maersk Sealand/Hapag-Lloyd 

Mediterranean U.S. East Coast Slot 

Charter Agreement. 

Parties: A.P. Moller Maersk A/S and 

Hapag-Lloyd Container Linie GmbH. 

Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; 

Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M Street 

NW.; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036. 

Synopsis: The amendment expands 

the range of Spanish ports covered by 

the agreement and adds ports in France 

to the geographic scope of the 

agreement. 

Dated: October 28, 2005. 

By order of the Federal Maritime 

Commission. 

Bryant L. VanBrakle, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05–21852 Filed 11–1–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730–01–P 

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

Ocean Transportation Intermediary 

License Rescission of Order of 

Revocation 

Notice is hereby given that the Order 

revoking the following license is being 

rescinded by the Federal Maritime 

Commission pursuant to sections 14 and 

19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 

U.S.C. app. 1718) and the regulations of 

the Commission pertaining to the 

licensing of Ocean Transportation 

Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515. 

License Number : 018946NF. 

Name: AMF Global Transportation, 

Inc. 

Address: 16530 Jarvis Avenue, Elk 

Grove Village, IL 60007. 

Order Published: FR: 10/5/05 (Volume 

70, No. 192, Pg. 58223). 

Sandra L. Kusumoto, 

Director, Bureau of Certification and 

Licensing. 

[FR Doc. 05–21848 Filed 11–1–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730–01–P 


EN02NO05.074</GPH>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-58,125] 

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 13, 2005 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at S. Lichtenberg and Company Inc., Samsons Mfg. Division, Waynesboro, Georgia. The workers are engaged in the production of curtains and drapes. 

The Department has determined that the petitioning group of workers is covered by an active certification, TA-W-53,381A which expires on December 4, 2005. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed in Washington, D.C., this 20th day of October, 2005. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 05-22329 Filed 11-8-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5605 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 47 East Fayette Street in Uniontown, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘George C. Marshall Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5605 RFS

1 SECTION 1. GEORGE C. MARSHALL POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 47 East Fayette Street in 

4 Uniontown, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated 

5 as the ‘‘George C. Marshall Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘George C. Marshall 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 30 

(legislative day September 29), 2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### I. A. SCHAFER v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY.

(Filed 25 May, 1966.)

Appeal and Error § 60—

Decision on appeal that the evidence justified a peremptory instruction upon an issue relates to the evidence of record upon the appeal and is not controlling upon the subsequent trial if there is a material difference in the evidence.

Moore, J., not sitting.

ON rehearing.

*420*White, Crumpler, Powell, Pfefferkorn & Green for plaintiff appellant.*

*W. T. Joyner; Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice for defendant appellee.*

Lake, J.

This cause, filed 14 January 1966, is reported in 266 N.C. 285, 145 S.E. 2d 887. In that opinion it is stated:

> “The undisputed evidence is that the defendant, without permission, entered upon land in possession of the plaintiff and dug a ditch thereon. This being denied in the answer, the court should have submitted to the jury the issue: Did the defendant trespass upon the land of the plaintiff, as alleged in the complaint? The jury should have been instructed to answer the issues in the affirmative if they believed the evidence on this point to be true. No such issue was submitted.”

In apt time the defendant filed a petition to rehear. The petition was allowed for the sole purpose of clarification of the foregoing paragraph of the original opinion.

That statement was and is intended to relate solely to the rights of the parties upon the evidence contained in the record before us on this appeal. It is not to be construed as a predetermination of the instructions to be given to the jury in the light of evidence presented at the new trial which is to be had in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

The defendant relies upon a contract, executed by the plaintiff and the defendant on 28 August 1946, in which contract the defendant agreed to operate an industrial track “located wholly on the right of way of the railway” for the purpose of affording to the plaintiff facilities for the shipment of his freight. By the agreement title to the rails, materials and fixtures in the said track are vested in the plaintiff, who agreed to maintain the track. The agreement provides, however, that at the election of the defendant it may “perform the work of maintenance” of the track “for account of” the plaintiff. It may be that, on the new trial of this action, the defendant can present evidence to show that the ditch in question is located on its right of way. If so, the above quoted statement in our opinion will not control the instruction to be given to the jury at that trial upon the issue of trespass. The record before us contains no evidence to show that the ditch was located within the boundaries of the defendant’s right of way.

Except as herein modified the opinion and decision heretofore announced are reaffirmed.

Moore, J., not sitting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000050982
<NAME> INTERCONTINENTAL LIFE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           460,596
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                            4,910
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                              4,527
<EQUITIES>                                       3,126
<MORTGAGE>                                      10,943
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   50,448
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 678,123
<CASH>                                           5,536
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              13,801
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          28,638
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,321,138
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                138,416
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              8,396
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 518,980
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            5,955
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 18,364
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,175
<OTHER-SE>                                     127,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,321,138
<PREMIUMS>                                       8,341
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             43,791
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   2,521
<BENEFITS>                                      28,596
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      1,778
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            12,393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,044
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,565
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,479
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,479
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.72
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2008322EN.01000201.xml

| 17.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 322/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 322/2

---

COMMISSION OPINION

COMMISSION OPINION

of 11 December 2008

concerning the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from the AGATE liquid effluent treatment plant, located in France, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty

(Only the French text is authentic)

(2008/C 322/02)

On 21 April 2008, the European Commission received from the Government of France, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty, General Data relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from the AGATE liquid effluent treatment plant.

On the basis of these data, and following consultation with the Group of Experts, the Commission has drawn up the following opinion:

| 1. | the distance between the AGATE facility and the nearest point on the territory of another Member State, in this case Italy, is approximately 110 km while Spain is 230 km away; |
| --- | --- |

1.

the distance between the AGATE facility and the nearest point on the territory of another Member State, in this case Italy, is approximately 110 km while Spain is 230 km away;

| 2. | during normal operation, the discharges of liquid and gaseous radioactive effluents will not cause an exposure liable to affect the health of the population in another Member State; |
| --- | --- |

2.

during normal operation, the discharges of liquid and gaseous radioactive effluents will not cause an exposure liable to affect the health of the population in another Member State;

| 3. | solid radioactive waste will be temporarily stored on site before being transferred to a disposal facility authorised by the French Government; |
| --- | --- |

3.

solid radioactive waste will be temporarily stored on site before being transferred to a disposal facility authorised by the French Government;

| 4. | in the event of unplanned releases of radioactive effluents, which may follow an accident of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, the doses received in another Member State will not be liable to affect the health of the population. |
| --- | --- |

4.

in the event of unplanned releases of radioactive effluents, which may follow an accident of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, the doses received in another Member State will not be liable to affect the health of the population.

In conclusion, the Commission is of the opinion that, both in normal operation and in the event of an accident of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, the implementation of the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste in whatever form arising from the AGATE liquid effluent treatment plant, located on the site of Cadarache in France, is not liable to result in radioactive contamination of the water, soil or airspace of another Member State.

---
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5595 

To amend section 214(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to create, 

for an alien seeking to enter the United States as a nonimmigrant 

to care for a relative with a serious health condition, an exemption 

from the presumption that the alien is an immigrant. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2010 

Mr. ELLISON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 214(b) of the Immigration and Nationality 

Act to create, for an alien seeking to enter the United 

States as a nonimmigrant to care for a relative with 

a serious health condition, an exemption from the presumption that the alien is an immigrant. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM PRESUMPTION THAT AN 

4 ALIEN IS AN IMMIGRANT. 

5 Section 214(b) of the Immigration and Nationality 

6 Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(b)) is amended— 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5595 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘(b) Every alien (other than’’ 

2 and inserting the following: 

3 ‘‘(b)(1) Every alien (except for a nonimmigrant de4 scribed in paragraph (2),’’; 

5 (2) by striking ‘‘and other than’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘and’’; and 

7 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(2) An alien is described in this paragraph if the 

9 alien— 

10 ‘‘(A) is a family member of an individual who— 

11 ‘‘(i) is suffering from a serious health con12 dition (as such term is defined in section 

13 101(11) of the Family and Medical Leave Act 

14 of 1993 (29 U.S.C. 2611(11)); and 

15 ‘‘(ii) is a citizen of the United States or an 

16 alien lawfully admitted to the United States for 

17 permanent residence; 

18 ‘‘(B) seeks to enter the United States to pro19 vide care to the individual described in subparagraph 

20 (A); and 

21 ‘‘(C) submits an attestation from a health care 

22 provider (as such term is defined in section 101(6) 

23 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (29 

24 U.S.C. 2611(6)) of the individual described in sub25 paragraph (A) that includes— 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5595 IH

1 ‘‘(i) a diagnosis statement, which includes 

2 the treatment being provided; and 

3 ‘‘(ii) the expected time period during which 

4 such care will be required.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS