alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

          <ARTICLE>     5
          <MULTIPLIER>     1,000
                 
          <S>                                <C>
          <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1997 
          <PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1997 
          <PERIOD-END>                                         MAR-31-1997 
          <PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
          <CASH>                                                    18,663
          <SECURITIES>                                                   0
          <RECEIVABLES>                                            320,140
          <ALLOWANCES>                                              19,276
          <INVENTORY>                                              288,052
          <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         632,957
          <PP&E>                                                   433,894
          <DEPRECIATION>                                           135,288
          <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         1,288,631
          <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    153,675
          <BONDS>                                                  567,800
          <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
          <PREFERRED>                                                    0
          <COMMON>                                                  61,467
          <OTHER-SE>                                               276,040
          <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           1,288,631
          <SALES>                                                  449,861
          <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         449,861
          <CGS>                                                    326,187
          <TOTAL-COSTS>                                            326,187
          <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
          <LOSS-PROVISION>                                           1,530
          <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         9,089
          <INCOME-PRETAX>                                           27,350
          <INCOME-TAX>                                              10,291
          <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       17,059
          <DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
          <EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
          <CHANGES>                                                      0
          <NET-INCOME>                                              17,059
          <EPS-PRIMARY>                                               0.28
          <EPS-DILUTED>                                               0.27
                  
          
</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Strategic Internet
  Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
  June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
  hereof (the "Report"). I, Abbas Salih, Chief Financial Officer of the company,
  certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

|Date: |  | August 20, 2004 | /s/ Abbas Salih           
|----- |  | --------------- | --------------------------
|      |  |                 | Abbas Salih, CFO, Director

---
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ROBERT OOTEN, JR.

No. 748SC1095

(Filed 7 May 1975)

Criminal Law § 124 — sufficiency of verdict

In a prosecution upon an indictment charging felonious breaking or entering, larceny and receiving, a jury verdict finding defendant guilty of nonfelonious entry and “not guilty on the other counts” was not ambiguous although the court did not submit the receiving count to the jury.

Appeal by defendant from *Rome, Judge.*Judgment entered 14- October 1974 in-the Súperior Court, Wayne County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 11 March 1975.

*675The defendant, Robert Ooten, Jr., was charged in a three-count bill of indictment, proper in form, with felonious breaking or entering, larceny, and receiving.

The defendant pleaded not guilty. The jury found the defendant “guilty of non-felonious entry; not guilty on the other counts.” From a judgment imposing a jail sentence of two years, defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Edmisten by Assistant Attorney General Charles J. Murray for the State.*

*Whitley and Vickory by C. Branson Viekory for defendant appellant.*

HEDRICK, Judge.

The only argument advanced by the defendant on this appeal is that “the verdict is clearly ambiguous and in view of the Law of North Carolina clearly holding that an ambiguous verdict, the ambiguity being unexplainable, must be interpreted in favor of the defendant. . . .”

Defendant insists that the phrase “not guilty on the other counts” makes the verdict ambiguous because he could have been found guilty of only two *counts*under the indictment. Defendant’s argument is not persuasive. By finding the defendant guilty of the lesser included offense charged in the first count of the bill of indictment, the jury found the defendant not guilty of felonious breaking or entering. The phrase in the verdict, “not guilty on the other counts,” merely expands the verdict to find the defendant not guilty of felonious larceny, the second count in the bill of indictment.

' The defendant had a fair trial free from prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Parker and Clark concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN 
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          14,147
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,147
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,409
<INVENTORY>                                    200,804
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               325,611
<PP&E>                                         169,759
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,620
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 454,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          133,687
<BONDS>                                        296,896
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,095
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   454,782
<SALES>                                        775,483
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               775,483
<CGS>                                          559,329
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  559,329
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                96,443
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   934
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,489
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,224
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,173
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,051
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,051
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### IN RE WILL OF WADSWORTH

No. 67 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 593.

Petition by propounder for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 November 1976.
#### CAMPBELL v. O’SULLIVAN

No. 3 PC.

Case below: 4 N.C. App. 581.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 10 July 1969.
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

S.F., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,

BUREAU OF LAND MANANGEMENT, 

Baker City, OR, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0313

Issued: February 1, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On December 19, 2022 appellant filed an appeal from a September 22, 2017 merit 

decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the 

Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 23-0313.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act.1 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance 

of OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the September 22, 2017 decision was March 21, 2018. As 

appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until December 19, 2022, more than 180 days 

after the September 22, 2017 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 

23-0313 is untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2 20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e).
2

not explained his failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to 

establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP 

within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed 

as No. 23-0313, must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-0313 is dismissed.

Issued: February 1, 2023

Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id.

at § 501.6(d).
Order entered January 25, 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00817

- CV

DAYDRICK NORRIS, Appellant

V.

TRANS AM SFE II LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 18

- 02790

- D



### O RDER

Befo re the Court is appellant’s January 23, 2019 motion for extension of time to file

brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than February 21, 20 19.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
#### Annie L. KNIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-60551.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided April 11, 2005.

Leonard B. Melvin, III, Hattiesburg, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Hite Colby Lane, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Mississippi, Jackson, MS, Thomas D. Ramsey, Social Security Administration, Boston, MA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Annie L. Knight appeals from the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision denying disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). The Commissioner concluded that she was disabled as of August 12, 1997, but, because Knight’s was “last insured” on June 30, 1996, she was not entitled to benefits. *See Loza v. Apfel,*219 F.3d 378, 394 (5th Cir.2000). On September 14, 1995, the Commissioner had denied Knight’s first application for DIB and SSI, wherein she had alleged a disability-onset date of October 1, 1995. Although in the instant case Knight again asserted that her disability-onset date was October 1, 1992, the Commissioner ruled that the first administrative decision was res judicata as to the period before and including September 14, 1995.

For the first time on appeal, Knight argues that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred in concluding that the prior administrative decision was res judicata as to the period before and including September 14, 1995. Arguments raised for the first time on appeal are not reviewed absent “exceptional circumstances,” *see Castillo v. Barnhart,*325 F.3d 550, 553 (5th Cir.2003), which Knight has not alleged. In any event, absent a “colorable constitutional claim,” an ALJ’s dismissal of a claimant’s case on res judicata grounds is “unreviewable.” *Brandyburg v. Sullivan,*959 F.2d 555, 561 (5th Cir.1992). Knight has not asserted a colorable constitutional claim.

Knight also argues that the ALJ failed to follow several Social Security rulings and “established Social Security law,” that the decision was not supported by substan*581tial evidence, that the ALJ erroneously assessed her credibility, and that the ALJ arbitrarily determined that she was disabled as of August 12, 1997, when the record reflected that her condition was no different on that date than the date before. After reviewing the briefs and the record, we conclude that the ALJ applied the correct legal standards and that the decision was supported by substantial evidence. *See Greenspan v. Shalala,*38 F.3d 232, 237 (5th Cir.1994).

Knight’s October 18, 2004, “Motion to Submit Additional Excerpts” is DENIED as unnecessary.

AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# L_2007175EN.01002701.xml

| 5.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 175/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 175/27

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 789/2007

of 4 July 2007

amending, for the eleventh time, Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 imposing certain restrictive measures in support of effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 imposing certain restrictive measures in support of effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) (1), and in particular Article 10(a) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 lists the persons covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 lists the persons covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation.

| (2) | The Commission is empowered to amend that Annex, taking into account Council Decisions implementing Common Position 2004/694/CFSP on further measures in support of the effective implementation of the mandate of ICTY (2). Council Decision 2007/449/CFSP (3) of 28 June 2007 implements that Common Position. Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 should, therefore, be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Commission is empowered to amend that Annex, taking into account Council Decisions implementing Common Position 2004/694/CFSP on further measures in support of the effective implementation of the mandate of ICTY (2). Council Decision 2007/449/CFSP (3) of 28 June 2007 implements that Common Position. Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 should, therefore, be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 July 2007.

For the Commission

Eneko LANDÁBURU

Director-General for External Relations

---

(1)  
  OJ L 315, 14.10.2004, p. 14. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1791/2006 (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 315, 14.10.2004, p. 52.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 169, 29.6.2007, p. 75.

3

---

ANNEX

The following persons shall be removed from Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004:

| 1. | Tolimir, Zdravko. Date of birth: 27.11.1948. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Tolimir, Zdravko. Date of birth: 27.11.1948.

| 2. | Djordjevic, Vlastimir. Date of birth: 1948. Place of birth: Vladicin Han, Serbia and Montenegro. Nationality: Serbia and Montenegro. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Djordjevic, Vlastimir. Date of birth: 1948. Place of birth: Vladicin Han, Serbia and Montenegro. Nationality: Serbia and Montenegro.

---
# L_2007109EN.01003201.xml

| 26.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 109/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 109/32

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 456/2007

of 25 April 2007

determining the allocation of export licences for certain milk products to be exported to the Dominican Republic under the quota referred to in Article 29 of Regulation (EC) No 1282/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1282/2006 of 17 August 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards export licences and export refunds in the case of milk and milk products (2), and in particular Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

Chapter III(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1282/2006 determines the procedure for allocating export licences for certain milk products to be exported to the Dominican Republic under a quota opened for that country. Applications submitted for the 2007/2008 quota year cover quantities greater than those available. As a result, allocation coefficients should be set for the quantities applied for,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities covered by export licence applications for the products referred to in Article 29(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1282/2006 submitted for the period 1 July 2007 to 30 June 2008 shall be multiplied by the following allocation coefficients:

| — | 0,653853 for applications submitted for the part of the quota referred to in Article 30(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1282/2006, |
| --- | --- |

—

0,653853 for applications submitted for the part of the quota referred to in Article 30(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1282/2006,

| — | 0,384549 for applications submitted for the part of the quota referred to in Article 30(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1282/2006. |
| --- | --- |

—

0,384549 for applications submitted for the part of the quota referred to in Article 30(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1282/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 26 April 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 April 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 234, 29.8.2006, p. 4. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1919/2006 (OJ L 380, 28.12.2006, p. 1).

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5593 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5593

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for timely 
            access to post-mastectomy items under Medicare.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2010

Ms. Sutton (for herself, Mr. Gingrey of Georgia, and Mr. Gene Green of 
    Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for timely 
            access to post-mastectomy items under Medicare.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TIMELY ACCESS TO POST-MASTECTOMY ITEMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1834(h)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395m) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraph (H) as subparagraph (I); 
        and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the following new 
        subparagraph:
                    ``(H) Special payment rule for post-mastectomy 
                external breast prosthesis garments.--Payment for post-
                mastectomy external breast prosthesis garments shall be 
                made regardless of whether such items are supplied to 
                the beneficiary prior to or after the mastectomy 
                procedure or other breast cancer surgical procedure. 
                The Secretary shall develop policies to ensure 
                appropriate beneficiary access and utilization 
                safeguards for such items supplied to a beneficiary 
                prior to the mastectomy or other breast cancer surgical 
                procedure.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```