alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 210 (Tuesday, November 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 65927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21703]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1603-DR]


Louisiana; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Louisiana (FEMA-1603-DR), dated August 29, 2005, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 22, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter 
dated October 22, 2005, the President amended the cost sharing 
arrangements concerning Federal funds provided under the authority of 
the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 
U.S.C. 5121-5206 (Stafford Act), in a letter to R. David Paulison, 
Acting Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of 
Homeland Security as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State 
of Louisiana resulting from Hurricane Katrina on August 29, 2005, 
and continuing, is of sufficient severity and magnitude that special 
conditions are warranted regarding the cost sharing arrangements 
concerning Federal funds provided under the Robert T. Stafford 
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121-5206 
(the Stafford Act).
    Therefore, I amend my declarations of August 29, 2005, and 
September 1, 2005, to authorize Federal funds for debris removal and 
emergency protective measures (Categories A and B), including direct 
Federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program, at 100 
percent of total eligible costs, through and including November 26, 
2005.
    Please notify Governor Blanco and the Federal Coordinating 
Officer of this amendment to my major disaster declaration.

    This cost share is effective as of the date of the President's 
major disaster declaration.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison,
Acting Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 05-21703 Filed 10-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 30, 2021

b0623

Order 

Clerk

June 30, 2021

161642

RAKESH NAYYAR, Personal Representative

of the ESTATE OF BIMLA NAYYAR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 161642

COA: 343676

Wayne CC: 13-009819-NH

OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC., d/b/a

OAKWOOD HOSPITAL & MEDICAL 

CENTER,

Defendant-Appellee.

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 14, 2020 judgment 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# L_2007078EN.01000901.xml

| 17.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 78/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 78/9

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 285/2007

of 16 March 2007

determining the extent to which applications lodged in March 2007 for import licences for certain pigmeat sector products pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1233/2006 can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1233/2006 of 16 August 2006 opening and providing for the administration of an import tariff quota of pigmeat allocated to the United States of America (1), and in particular Article 5(5) thereof,

Whereas:

The applications for import licences lodged for the period 1 April to 30 June 2007 are less than the quantities available and can therefore be fulfilled entirely,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Applications for import licences for the period 1 April to 30 June 2007 submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1233/2006 shall be met as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 March 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 March 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 225, 17.8.2006, p. 14.

1

---

ANNEX

| Order No | Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period of 1 April to 30 June 2007 |
| --- | --- |
| 09.4170 | 100 |

Order No

Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period of 1 April to 30 June 2007

09.4170

100

---
# L_2007346EN.01002801.xml

| 29.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 346/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 346/28

---

COUNCIL JOINT ACTION 2007/887/CFSP

of 20 December 2007

repealing Joint Action 2005/557/CFSP on the European Union civilian-military supporting action to the African Union missions in the Darfur region of Sudan and in Somalia

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 14 thereof,

Having regard to Joint Action 2005/557/CFSP of 18 July 2005 on the European Union civilian-military supporting action to the African Union missions in the Darfur region of Sudan and in Somalia (1), and in particular Article 16(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | By Joint Action 2005/557/CFSP, the European Union established a civilian-military action to support the African Union Missions in the Darfur region of Sudan and in Somalia (AMIS/AMISOM). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By Joint Action 2005/557/CFSP, the European Union established a civilian-military action to support the African Union Missions in the Darfur region of Sudan and in Somalia (AMIS/AMISOM).

| (2) | Pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1769 (2007), the African Union/UN Operation in Darfur (UNAMID) is to take over authority from AMIS no later than 31 December 2007. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1769 (2007), the African Union/UN Operation in Darfur (UNAMID) is to take over authority from AMIS no later than 31 December 2007.

| (3) | The AMIS/AMISOM EU Supporting Action should be closed when authority is transferred to UNAMID, and the necessary measures will then be taken for the liquidation of the EU Supporting Action, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The AMIS/AMISOM EU Supporting Action should be closed when authority is transferred to UNAMID, and the necessary measures will then be taken for the liquidation of the EU Supporting Action,

HAS ADOPTED THIS JOINT ACTION:

Article 1

Joint Action 2005/557/CFSP shall be repealed as from 1 January 2008.

Article 2

This Joint Action shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Article 3

This Joint Action shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 20 December 2007.

For the Council

The President

F. NUNES CORREIA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 188, 20.7.2005, p. 46. Joint Action as amended by Joint Action 2007/245/CFSP (OJ L 106, 24.4.2007, p. 65).

1

---
NO. 07-05-0320-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	SEPTEMBER 23, 2005

	______________________________

	IN RE TIMOTHY HEMBREE, RELATOR

	_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	By this original proceeding, relator Timothy Hembree, acting pro se,1 seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the judge of the 31st District Court of Gray County to dismiss a detainer filed against relator with the Oklahoma Corrections Department, resulting from relator’s indictment in cause number 6444 in the 31st  District Court of Gray County, Texas.  We dismiss the petition.

	Rule 52.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure prescribes the mandatory contents of a petition for mandamus.  Specifically, relator has failed to comply with subparagraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (h) and (j) of Rule 52.3.

	Thus, because relator has not complied with the requirements of Rule 52 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we dismiss this proceeding.2		

							Mackey K. Hancock

							         Justice
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army; DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Public Law 92-463, The Federal Advisory Committee Act, announcement is made of the following meeting:

*Name of Committee:*                         Armed Forces Epidemiological Board (AFEB).                    

*Dates:*                         December 6, 2005 (Open meeting). December 7, 2005 (Open meeting).                     

*Times:*                         8 a.m.-5 p.m. (December 6, 2005). 8 a.m.-3 p.m. (December 7, 2005).                    

*Location:*                         The Pope Club, 5504 Reilly Street, Ft. Bragg, North Carolina 28307-5217.                    

*Agenda:*                         The purpose of the meeting is to address pending and new Board issues, provide briefings for Board members on Topics related to ongoing and new Board issues, conduct subcommittee meetings. and conduct an executive working session.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Colonel Roger Gibson, Executive Secretary, Armed Forces Epidemiological Board, Skyline Six, 5109 Leesburg Pike, Room 682, Falls Church, VA 22041-3258, (703) 681-8012/3.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The entire sessions on December 6, 2005 and December 7, 2005 will be open to the public in accordance with section 552b(b) of Title 5, U.S.C., specifically subparagraph (1) thereof and Title 5, U.S.C., appendix 1, subsection10(d). Open sessions of the meeting will be limited by space accommodations. Any interested person may attend, appear before or file statements with the Board at the time and in the manner permitted by the Board.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-22093 Filed 11-4-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Presidential Documents

66741 

Federal Register 

Vol. 70, No. 211 

Wednesday, November 2, 2005 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 7951 of October 30, 2005 

Death of Rosa Parks 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

As a mark of respect for the memory of Rosa Parks, I hereby order, by 

the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United 

States of America, that on the day of her interment, the flag of the United 

States shall be flown at half-staff at the White House and upon all public 

buildings and grounds, at all military posts and naval stations, and on 

all naval vessels of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia 

and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions until 

sunset on such day. I also direct that the flag shall be flown at halfstaff for the same period at all United States embassies, legations, consular 

offices, and other facilities abroad, including all military facilities and naval 

vessels and stations. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth. 

W 

[FR Doc. 05–21988 

Filed 11–1–05; 8:51 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P
Exhibit 12

           INTERNATIONAL MULTIFOODS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

            Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                  (unaudited)

                                 (in thousands)



                                       THREE MONTHS ENDED     SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                      --------------------    -----------------
                                      Aug. 31,     Aug. 31,   Aug. 31,  Aug. 31,
                                         1999         1998       1999      1998
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings (loss) from
  continuing operations
  before income taxes                 $ 8,210      $ 7,647    $15,569  $(14,481)
Plus: Fixed charges (1)                 6,062        5,849     13,067    11,927
Less: Capitalized interest               (205)         (31)      (329)      (31)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings available to cover
  fixed charges (2)                   $14,067      $13,465    $28,307  $ (2,585)
===============================================================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (2)   2.32         2.30       2.17       N/A
===============================================================================
(1) Fixed charges consisted of the following:


                                       THREE MONTHS ENDED     SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                      --------------------    -----------------
                                      Aug. 31,     Aug. 31,   Aug. 31,  Aug. 31,
                                         1999         1998       1999      1998
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest expense, gross                $3,852       $3,602    $ 8,447   $ 7,435
Rentals (Interest factor)               2,210        2,247      4,620     4,492
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Total fixed charges                  $6,062       $5,849    $13,067   $11,927
===============================================================================

(2) For the six months ended August 31, 1998, earnings were inadequate
to cover fixed charges by $14,481.  The deficiency was the result of
unusual items as described in Note 5 to the consolidated condensed
financial statements.  Excluding unusual items, the ratio of earnings
to fixed charges would have been 1.21 for the six months ended
August 31, 1998.
#### Theodore L. BISSONNETTE, Jr., Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 05-7058.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: March 8, 2005.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the unopposed motion of Theodore L. Bissonnette, Jr. to voluntarily dismiss his appeal (CAVC No. 01-1322),

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d byN i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S H A W N D E E H A R T L E S S , on B e ha l f of H er se l f and A l l O thers S i m i l ar l y S i tuat ed and the G ener alP ub l i c, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. C L OR OX C OMP AN Y, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee .

_______________________ S ON I A N E WM AN , O b

je c to r - A p p e llan t. N o. 11- 55136 D. C . No . 3 : 0 6 - c v - 0 2 7 0 5 - C AB ME MOR AN DU M *

S H A W N D E E H A R T L E S S , on B e ha l f of H er se l f and A l l O thers S i m i l ar l y S i tuat ed and the G ener alP ub l i c, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. C L OR OX C OMP AN Y, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 11- 55150 D. C . No . 3 : 0 6 - c v - 0 2 7 0 5 - C AB



# FI LED MA Y24 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

_____________________ OMARR I VE R O, O b

je c to r- A p p e llan t. S H A W N D E E H A R T L E S S , on B e ha l f of H er se l f and A l l O thers S i m i l ar l y S i tuat ed and the G ener alP ub l i c, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. C L OR OX C OMP AN Y, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee .

____________________ S AM P . C AN NA T A, O b

je c to r- A p p e llan t. N o. 11- 55189 D. C . No . 3 : 0 6 - c v - 0 2 7 0 5 - C AB

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia C a thyA nn B e nc i ve ngo, M a gi s tr a t e Judge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d M ay10, 2012 P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , G R A B E R , an dB E R Z O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es.3

O bj e c t or s S oni aN e w m a n, O m arR i ve r o, a nd S a m P . C anna t aappe a l the di stri ctcourt ’ s c l as s c ert i fi cat i on i n thi s c l as s a ct i on brou gh tby l ea d P l ai nt i ff S ha w nde e H a rt l e s s a ga i ns tD e f e ndantC l or ox C om pany . T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d not ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in c e rtif y in g th e s e ttle m e n t c la s s . S e e P arr av . B a s h a s ’, I n c ., 5 3 6 F .3 d9 7 5 , 9 7 7

– 7 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( s ta tin g th e s tan d ar do f r e v ie w ) . O n th is reco rd , th e co u rtw as n o treq u i redt o d i v i d e th e n at i o n w i d e cl ass i n t o sub -cl asses, a s the O bj e c t or s w i s h. AF F I RME D.
#### CRUTCHER v. NOEL

No. 53 PC.

Case below: 17 N.C. App. 540.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 30 April 1973.
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

R.G., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, 

Plantation, FL, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 22-0653

Issued: April 29, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On March 21, 2022 appellant filed an appeal from a March 23, 2021 merit decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 22-0653.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act.1 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance 

of OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the March 23, 2021 decision was September 19, 2021. As 

appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until March 21, 2022,more than 180 days after 

the March 23, 2021 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 22-0653 is 

untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not offered 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e).
2

a reason to explain the failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient 

to establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by 

OWCP within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal 

docketed as No. 22-0653, must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 22-0653 is dismissed.

Issued: April 29, 2022

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id.

at § 501.6(d).