alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.44


                                PROMISSORY NOTE


AMOUNT: $200,000.00                                         DATE: SEPT. 14, 2000


Fifteen days after date of receipt, for value received, the undersigned (jointly
and severally if more than one), promise(s) to pay to the order of:


                                  ACCUREC LLC
                                   Tax I.D.

The sum of Two Hundred Thousand dollars plus an interest equal to (8% annually)
           ----------------------------
payable at any place the holder may so designate. Interest to be paid off at
loan pay off time.

The undersigned and any endorser or guarantors herefore, jointly and severally,
hereby agree that upon default in payment of performance of this note, or the
death, or any act of insolvency or bankruptcy on the part of any of them,
however expressed or indicated, then this note shall, at the option of the
holder, become immediately due and payable without presentment, demand, protest
or further attorney and/or agent of the holder, and the undersigned, and any
endorser or guarantors, jointly and severally, agree to pay all collection
costs, expenses, agents' fees, and reasonably attorney's fees.

The undersigned further states if he should default on said loan, the lender
shall be authorized to place a lien on the following collateral:

                     1. All properties of Color Image Inc


Borrowers Signature:                                     Address:

/s/ Sueling Wang                               4350 Peachtree Industrial Blvd.
-----------------------------------------
                                               Suite 100
Sueling Wang, President Color Image, Inc.      Norcross, GA 30071


/s/ Ann Shieh                                  /s/ Morris E. Van Aspere
-----------------------------------------
Witness
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5599 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5599

  To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify the scope of the 
   provision commonly referred to as the ``Wire Act'', and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2010

  Mr. Murphy of New York (for himself and Mr. Guthrie) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify the scope of the 
   provision commonly referred to as the ``Wire Act'', and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wire Clarification Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. SCOPE OF SO-CALLED ``WIRE ACT''.

    Section 1084 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Clarification of Scope.--This section, subchapter IV of 
chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code (enacted into law by the 
Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006), and any other 
provision of Federal law that establishes criminal penalties for any 
activity involved in placing, receiving or otherwise transmitting a bet 
or wager shall not apply to any bet or wager that is permissible under 
the Interstate Horseracing Act of 1978 (15 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.).''.
                                 <all>
```
# Death of Rosa Parks

As a mark of respect for the memory of Rosa Parks, I hereby order, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America, that on the day of her interment, the flag of the United States shall be flown at half-staff at the White House and upon all public buildings and grounds, at all military posts and naval stations, and on all naval vessels of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions until sunset on such day. I also direct that the flag shall be flown at half-staff for the same period at all United States embassies, legations, consular offices, and other facilities abroad, including all military facilities and naval vessels and stations.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth.

[FR Doc. 05-21988

Billing code 3195-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5569 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5569

  To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until September 30, 
                                 2010.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 2010

Ms. Waters (for herself, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Kanjorski, and 
  Mr. Jones) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on 
the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until September 30, 
                                 2010.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Flood Insurance Program 
Extension Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM.

    (a) Program Extension.--Section 1319 of the National Flood 
Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is amended by striking 
``September 30, 2008'' and inserting ``September 30, 2010''.
    (b) Financing.--Section 1309(a) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``September 30, 2008'' and inserting 
        ``September 30, 2010''; and
            (2) by striking ``$20,775,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$20,725,000,000''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) 
shall be considered to have taken effect on May 31, 2010.

SEC. 3. BUDGET COMPLIANCE.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-QSB of Marani Brands, Inc.
(the  "Company")  for the quarter ended March  31,  2008,  as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), J. Scott
Zimmerman, Chief Executive  Officer  and  Principal  Financial  Officer  of the
Company,  hereby  certifies,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. {section}1350, as adopted
pursuant to {section}906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements  of  Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in  all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 20, 2008	/s/ J. Scott Zimmerman
			----------------------
                 	J. Scott Zimmerman
                 	Chief Executive Officer
                 	(Principal Executive Officer and
			 Principal Financial Officer)


This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to {section}  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the  Company f or  purposes  of
{section}18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section  906 has  been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   12-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1996
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1996
[CASH]                                               1
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                        1
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                     2
[PP&E]                                               4
[DEPRECIATION]                                       3
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                     372
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                               32
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                           125
[OTHER-SE]                                        2517
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                       372
[SALES]                                              1
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                     4
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                    94
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                   (90)
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                               (90)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                      (90)
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                   (.009)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                   (.009)
</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5437 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the treatment 

of tenant-stockholders in cooperative housing corporations also shall apply 

to stockholders of corporations that only own the land on which the 

residences are located. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 27, 2010 

Mr. CROWLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

that the treatment of tenant-stockholders in cooperative 

housing corporations also shall apply to stockholders of 

corporations that only own the land on which the residences are located. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5437 IH

1 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF RULES APPLICABLE TO 

2 TENANT-STOCKHOLDERS OF COOPERATIVE 

3 HOUSING CORPORATIONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 216 of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(7) COOPERATIVE HOUSING CORPORATIONS

8 OWNING OR LEASING ONLY LAND.— 

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘cooperative 

10 housing corporation’ includes any corporation 

11 which would be a cooperative housing corpora12 tion if ‘or situated on land owned or leased by 

13 the corporation’ were inserted before the 

14 comma at the end of paragraph (1)(B). 

15 ‘‘(B) DETERMINATION OF WHETHER

16 STOCK IS FULLY PAID-UP.—In the case of a 

17 corporation which would not be a cooperative 

18 housing corporation but for subparagraph (A), 

19 the determination under paragraph (2) of 

20 whether the stock of any stockholder who owns 

21 a house situated on land owned or leased by the 

22 corporation is fully paid-up shall be based on 

23 the portion of the value of the corporation’s eq24 uity in the land on which the houses are situ25 ated which is attributable to the land on which 

26 such stockholder’s house is situated. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5437 IH

1 ‘‘(C) TRAILER PARKS EXCLUDED.—This 

2 paragraph shall not apply if any house situated 

3 on land owned or leased by the corporation is 

4 a mobile home.’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

6 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

7 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
fop? JLont

csj

TO

-CS1

CO

cr:

cr.

(\ ijrrj 10 z?°r

2.-***)

/< Bb

<ioprt4ji(3 J°

21

JV

rv

0/i r>0

SHV

X.J*&*t) Unu4

vyj

0±

{Q }^s t»ss

it:
FILED

T&L&~- ■'■'■ '"'■'

2015 AUG 21

K€!THE.H3U1 '.CLERK

CO

to

7s/

I;
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.12

                               FOURTH AMENDMENT TO
                           SEAGULL ENERGY CORPORATION
                            MANAGEMENT STABILITY PLAN



         WHEREAS, SEAGULL ENERGY CORPORATION (the "COMPANY") has heretofore
adopted and currently maintains the SEAGULL ENERGY CORPORATION MANAGEMENT
STABILITY PLAN (the "PLAN"); and

         WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of
January 1, 1999:

         1. The following sentence shall be added to Section 2.3 of the Plan:

         "Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that salary continuation
         or severance payments are payable by the Employer to a Covered Employee
         for any reason other than under this Plan ("Other Severance Payments"),
         including, but not limited to, under any other Employer plan, policy or
         agreement, other than a "plan" within the meaning of section 3(3) of
         the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or as
         a result of the application of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining
         Notification Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 2101 et. seq. (the "WARN Act"), or
         an election by the Employer to make payments in lieu of notice as if
         the WARN Act applied, whether or not it does so apply, to an
         Involuntary Termination of a Covered Employee, no severance payments
         shall be payable as provided in Sections 2.1(a) or (b) to such Covered
         Employee except to the extent such severance payments exceed the
         aggregate amount of Other Severance Payments payable to such Covered
         Employee."

         2. Other than with respect to the transactions contemplated by the
Agreement and Plan of Merger between Seagull Energy Corporation and Ocean
Energy, Inc. (dated as of November 24, 1998), which, if consummated, shall
constitute a "Change of Control" for all purposes under the Plan following which
severance benefits shall be payable as provided herein, the Plan shall be, and
is hereby, terminated.

         3. As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.




<PAGE>   2


         EXECUTED this 26th day of January, 1999.

                                          SEAGULL ENERGY CORPORATION



                                          BY:   /s/ WILLIAM L. TRANSIER
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             NAME:  William L. Transier
                                                  ------------------------------
                                             TITLE: Executive Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                   -----------------------------






                                       -2-
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAKE DAVIS

No. 7726SC1052

(Filed 6 June 1978)

Assault and Battery § 14.4— assault with deadly weapon inflicting serious injury— sufficiency of evidence

In a prosecution for assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury, evidence was sufficient to be submitted to the jury where it tended to show that a witness saw defendant shoot the victim, and defendant confessed to the shooting.

APPEAL by defendant from *Martin (Harry CJ, Judge.*Judgment entered 26 July 1977 in Superior Court, MECKLENBURG County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 25 April 1978.

Defendant was convicted of assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury. Judgment imposing a prison sentence was entered.

*Attorney General Edmisten, by Associate Attorney Thomas F. Moffitt, for the State.*

*Public Defender Michael S. Scofield, by Assistant Public Defender Fritz Y. Mercer, Jr., for defendant appellant.*

VAUGHN, Judge.

We first note that the appeal is subject to dismissal for failure to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure. The record on appeal was settled by stipulation on 28 September 1977. Instead of causing it to be certified by the clerk within 10 days as required by Rule 11(e), the appellant allowed the case to lie dormant until 20 December 1977, when he caused it to be certified by the clerk. We have elected, however, to afford defendant the appellate review he seeks through publicly paid counsel.

The only assignment of error is one in which defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to take the case to the jury. The argument is, at best, tedious in the light of the following evidence. About 1:00 a.m. on 11 February 1977, defendant was on Belmont Street in Charlotte with a loaded .22 caliber rifle. He had said something about killing someone that night. He attempted to *649intervene in a frolic between Reginald Kidd and Vera McAlway. Vera told defendant not to interfere. Annie Cox was looking out of a nearby window and saw defendant shoot Reginald. Reginald was taken to the hospital for gunshot wounds in the stomach. Defendant first claimed that Vera had done the shooting. Then he said, “If it wasn’t for you, I wouldn’t have never shot him.”

No error.

Judges Parker and Webb concur.
#### STATE v. ALL

No. 14 PC.

Case below: 17 N.C. App. 284.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of of Appeals denied 6 March 1973.
Exhibit
10.1


 


FORFEITURE
AGREEMENT


 


This
Forfeiture Agreement (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of [*], by and between [*] (the “Transferor”) and
AGAPE ATP CORPORATION. (the “Transferee”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS,
the Transferor desires to transfer [*] shares (the “Shares”) of common stock of the Transferee back to the Transferee.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties hereto, for good and valuable consideration which each party acknowledges the receipt of, hereby agree as follows:


 


1.
Transfer of the Shares.


 


The
Transferor hereby transfers to the Transferee the Shares, and the Transferee hereby cancels the Shares.


 


2.
Representations and Warranties of the Transferor.


 


The
Transferor represents and warrants that it has full legal capacity and authority to enter into the Agreement and to transfer the Shares
to the Transferee hereunder, and is not bound by any agreement, instrument or governmental order prohibiting such transfer. The Transferor
also represents that it is transferring such interests free and clear of all liens and encumbrances other than those created by the terms
of the Transferee’s organizational documents or imposed by applicable federal and state securities laws.


 


3.
Binding Effect.


 


This
Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors
and assigns.


 


4.
Entire Agreement.


 


This
Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties hereto.


 


5.
Governing Law.


 


This
Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York without regard to its conflict of laws principles.


 


6.
Modification.


 


This
Agreement may not be amended or supplemented at any time unless by a writing executed by the parties hereto.


 


7.
Headings.


 


The
headings in this Agreement are solely for convenience or reference and shall not affect its interpretation.


 


8.
Counterparts; Facsimile.


 


This
Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of
which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Agreement or any counterpart may be executed via facsimile or
other electronic transmission, and any such executed facsimile or electronic copy shall be treated as an original.


 


[The
balance of this page is intentionally left page.]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above.





 


	 	Transferor:
	 	 
	 	[*]
	 	 	         
	 	By:	 
	 	Name:
    	[*]
	 	Title:
    	[*]


 


	 	Transferee:
	 	 
	 	Agape
                                            ATP Corporation

	 	 	 
	 	By:	         
	 	Name:	[*]
	 	Title:
    	[*]


 




    	2
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5408 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to change the state of mind 

requirement for certain identity theft offenses, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2010 

Mr. GOODLATTE (for himself, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. SMITH of Texas, and Mr. 

PUTNAM) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to change the state 

of mind requirement for certain identity theft offenses, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Identity Theft Im5 provement Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STATE OF MIND REQUIREMENT FOR IDENTITY 

7 THEFT AND AGGRAVATED IDENTITY THEFT. 

8 Section 1028 of title 18, United States Code, is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following: 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5408 IH

1 ‘‘(j) STATE OF MIND PROOF REQUIREMENT.—In a 

2 prosecution under subsection (a)(7) or under section 

3 1028A(a), the Government need not prove that the de4 fendant knew the means of identification was of another 

5 person.’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS