alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements (Nos. 333-65113, 333-84848, 333-96717, 333-110553 and 333-152296) onForms S-8 of Cache, Inc. of our report dated March 11, 2009, relatingto the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statementschedule of Cache, Inc. and subsidiaries and management’s report on theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Cache, Inc. and subsidiaries for theyear ended December 27, 2008.

 

/s/ MHM Mahoney Cohen CPAs

(The New York Practice of Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.)

 

New York, New York

March 12, 2009

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before December 5, 2005, to be assured of consideration. 

## Internal Revenue Service (IRS) 

*OMB Number:*                     1545-1537.                 

*Type of Review:*                     Extension.                 

*Title:*                     REG-253578-96(NPRM) Health Insurance Portability for Group Plans; (Temporary) Interim Rules for Health Insurance Portability for Group Health Plans.                 

*Description:*                     The regulations provide guidance for group health plans and the employers maintaining them regarding requirements imposed on plans relating to preexisting condition exclusions, discrimination based on health status, and access to coverage.                 

*Respondents:*                     Business or other for-profit, Not-for-profit institutions, State, local or tribal.                 

*Estimated Total Burden Hours:*                     262,289 hours.                 

*Clearance Officer:*                     Glenn P. Kirkland, (202) 622-3428, Internal Revenue Service, Room 6516, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224.                 

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7316, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                 

Michael A. Robinson, 

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05-21923 Filed 11-2-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit
23.1
      CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  
   The Board
of Directors and Stockholders
   BSD
Medical Corporation
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-162080 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-157025, No.
333-142973, and No. 333-50588 on Form S-8 of BSD Medical Corporation of our
reports dated November 6, 2009 with respect to the financial statements and
internal control over financial reporting of BSD Medical Corporation contained
in BSD Medical Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
August 31, 2009.
 
 /s/
Tanner LC
 
 
 Salt Lake
City, Utah
 November 6,
2009
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00073-CV

Rogelio SALINAS,

Appellant

v.

HASSLOCHER ENTERPRISES, INC.,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 35601

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 9, 2010

DISMISSED

Rogelio Salinas’s appellant’s brief was due April 22, 2010. The clerk of this court notified

Salinas’s attorney of the due date by letter dated March 23, 2010. Neither the brief nor a motion for

extension of time was filed. Accordingly, on May 5, 2010, the court ordered Salinas to file, not later

than May 17, 2010, his appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining his failure to
04-10-00073-CV

-2-

timely file the brief. We advised Salinas that if he failed to file a brief and the written response by

the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX.R. APP. P. 38.8(a).

Salinas did not file a timely response to tour May 5 order. Instead, Salinas filed a response

on May 21, 2010, stating he did not receive the May 5 order until May 20; and stating that

appellant’s brief would be filed “on or before May 25, 2010.” The brief has not been filed.

We therefore order this appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM
*

The Honorable James S. Gwin, United States District Judge for the Northern District of

Ohio, sitting by designation. 

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 05a0609n.06

Filed: July 19, 2005

No. 04-3419

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

GRADUAL TAYLOR,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CHERYL HART,

Defendant-Appellant,

CITY OF CINCINNATI POLICE,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Before: MOORE and COOK, Circuit Judges; GWIN,*

 District Judge.

PER CURIAM. Finding that Gradual Taylor, proceeding pro se, sufficiently alleged

facts—arrest and prosecution without probable cause based on the purposeful and malicious filing

of a false police report—that, when viewed in a light most favorable to him, make out a Fourth

Amendment violation by Officer Hart and obviate her entitlement to qualified immunity (regardless

of the fine contours of such a claim in this circuit at the time of the maliciously false report), we

affirm the judgment of the district court and remand for further proceedings.
Exhibit 10.3 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

IONICS, INCORPORATED 

SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVERETIREMENT PLAN 

        Ionics,Incorporated, having reserved in Section 6.1 the power to amend the Ionics, IncorporatedSupplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) from time to time, herebyamends the Plan as follows, effective April 1, 2003: 

    1.                 Definitions. The following definitions are added to the Plan, and the          other definitions renumbered as appropriate:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 30, 2013

s0722

Order 

Clerk

July 30, 2013

146953

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146953

COA: 313270

Muskegon CC: 85-026846-FH

LARRY DARNELL JONES, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 219 (Tuesday, November 15, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 69362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22099]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 40-8838-MLA; ASLBP No. 00-776-04-MLA]


Establishment of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972, 
published in the Federal Register, 37 FR 28,710 (1972), and the 
Commission's regulations, see 10 CFR 2.104, 2.300, 2.303, 2.309, 2.311, 
2.318, and 2.321, notice is hereby given that an Atomic Safety and 
Licensing Board is being established to preside over the following 
proceeding:

U.S. Army

(Jefferson Proving Ground Site)

    This Licensing Board is being established pursuant to a Commission 
memorandum and order, CLI-05-23, 62 NRC--(Oct. 26, 2005), that (1) 
Affirmed a Presiding Officer's decision to reinstate this proceeding, 
see LBP-05-25, 62 NRC--(Sept. 12, 2005); and (2) directed that a three-
member Licensing Board be appointed to conduct this reinstated 
proceeding, which is to be adjudicated using the revised procedural 
rules that became effective in February 2004, see 69 FR 2182 (Jan. 24, 
2004).
    The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:
    Alan S. Rosenthal, Chair, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
    Dr. Paul B. Abramson, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
    Dr. Richard F. Cole, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed 
with the administrative judges in accordance with 10 CFR 2.302.

    Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 1st day of November 2005.
G. Paul Bollwerk, III,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 05-22099 Filed 11-14-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF JOURNAL EMPLOYES' STOCK TRUST AS OF AND FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,040<F1>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,040<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>The only revenue and expense associated with the trust pertains to 
dividends received and paid out.  All dividends received are in turn 
paid out, accounting for net income of zero ($0).
<F2>Earnings per share is not applicable as net income is zero ($0).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# Provision of U.S. Drug Interdiction Assistance to the Government of Brazil

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of Defense

 Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 1012 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995, as amended (22 U.S.C. § 2291-4), I hereby certify, with respect to Brazil, that (1) interdiction of aircraft reasonably suspected to be primarily engaged in illicit drug trafficking in that country's airspace is necessary because of the extraordinary threat posed by illicit drug trafficking to the national security of that country; and (2) that country has appropriate procedures in place to protect against innocent loss of life in the air and on the ground in connection with such interdiction, which shall at a minimum include effective means to identify and warn an aircraft before the use of force is directed against the aircraft. 

                    The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                     **Federal Register**                     and to notify Congress of this determination.                 

[FR Doc. 05-21615

Billing code 4710-10-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro GUERRERO-MORENO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-51373.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided April 20, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Scott Alan Vogelmeier, El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Pedro Guerrero-Moreno raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) ' and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
null

511.45032
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco ROMUALDO PUENTE-CAMPOS, also known as Jorge Isabel Martinez-Villanueva, also known as Frank Rodriguez-Campos, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-11090.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 20, 2005.

Denise B. Williams, U.S. Attorney’S Office Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Helen Miller Liggett, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’S Office Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Francisco Romualdo Puente-Campos raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 *588U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0542

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ERIC JOE JAYNES,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 28, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 22 2024

07/22/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0542
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as


Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BSD Medical Corporation (the
“Company”) for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis
P. Gauger, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











Date:
            November
      14, 2008By:
            /s/ Dennis P.
      GaugerDennis
      P. GaugerChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

RICHARD MICKMAN,

Respondent

v.

ELAINE MICKMAN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 387 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
#### In re ESTATE OF ELSIE T.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Submitted May 7, 1990.

Decided May 16, 1990.

John M. Pluto, Van Burén, for plaintiff.

Richard D. Solman, Caribou, Guardian ad Litem.

L. James Lavertu, Madawaska, for defendant.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN and CLIFFORD, JJ.

ROBERTS, Justice.

A daughter of Elsie T. appeals from the order of the Aroostook County Probate Court *(Woodcock, J.)*appointing two other daughters as co-guardians of Elsie T. The only issue we consider is whether one of the co-guardians is disqualified from serving by virtue of 18-A M.R.S.A. § 5-311(c) (Supp.1989). We conclude that she is disqualified and accordingly vacate the order.

The appellant contends that her sister is disqualified from serving as a co-guardian by the express language of section 5-311(c), which provides in pertinent part as follows:

> No owner, proprietor, administrator, employee or other person with a substantial financial interest in a facility or institution which is licensed ... may act as guardian of an incapacitated person who is a resident....

The court acknowledged that the sister is a licensed practical nurse employed by the nursing home to which Elsie T. will be moved. The court concluded, nevertheless, that she was not disqualified because there was no evidence that she had any financial interest in the home, citing *Estate of Peter C.,*488 A.2d 468 (Me.1985). After our decision in *Peter C.,*however, the Legislature amended the statute to make clear that persons rather than facilities or institutions are barred. P.L.1985, c. 770, § 1. The limiting language “with a substantial financial interest” is intended to modify only “other persons.” Any employee, therefore, is disqualified by the statute as amended.

Because we vacate the order of appointment, we need not address the appellant’s second issue and we express no opinion on that issue.

The entry is:

Order of appointment of co-guardians vacated.

Remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion herein.

All concurring.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>   This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
           from the Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations included in the
           Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and is
           qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1000
       
<S>                                                    <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                         Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                           Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          12-MOS
<CASH>                                                    50,856
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             25,517
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 366
<INVENTORY>                                               22,232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         105,760
<PP&E>                                                   424,401
<DEPRECIATION>                                           242,653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           297,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     58,953
<BONDS>                                                  280,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                               25,000
<COMMON>                                                     401
<OTHER-SE>                                               (73,632)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             297,071
<SALES>                                                  204,738
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         204,738
<CGS>                                                    163,315
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            163,315
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          28,846
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             153
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        24,375
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (101,776)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             (14,248)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (87,528)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (87,528)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0.00
        

</TABLE>