alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5600 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5600

To make permanent the exclusion from gross income for employer-provided 
                        educational assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2010

 Mr. Pomeroy (for himself and Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make permanent the exclusion from gross income for employer-provided 
                        educational assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Employee Educational Assistance Act 
of 2010''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR EMPLOYER-PROVIDED EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE MADE 
              PERMANENT.

    Section 901 of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation 
Act of 2001 shall not apply to section 411 of such Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7144

ROBERT K. ELLIS,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

D. BERKEBILE, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, 

District Judge. (5:10-cv-00931)

Submitted: December 21, 2010 Decided: January 4, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert K. Ellis, Appellant Pro Se. Lara Dee Pyne Crane, BUREAU 

OF PRISONS, Beaver, West Virginia, Stephen Michael Horn, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert K. Ellis, a federal prisoner, appeals the 

district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 

U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition for failure to 

exhaust administrative remedies and the court’s order denying 

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s 

orders on the reasoning set forth therein. See Ellis v. 

Berkebile, No. 5:10-cv-00931 (S.D. W. Va. Aug. 6, 2010 & Oct. 1, 

2010). We also deny Ellis’ pending motions for appointment of 

counsel, an emergency dental exam and treatment, transcripts at 

government expense, a copy of his dental records, and for 

injunctive relief. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5

<MULTIPLIER>     1,000



<S>                                <C>

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-2000

<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-2000

<PERIOD-END>                                         MAR-31-2000

<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS

<CASH>                                                    10,693

<SECURITIES>                                                   0

<RECEIVABLES>                                            397,483

<ALLOWANCES>                                              20,179

<INVENTORY>                                              292,020

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         713,884

<PP&E>                                                   555,149

<DEPRECIATION>                                           260,217

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         1,324,349

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    192,870

<BONDS>                                                  502,000

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0

<PREFERRED>                                                    0

<COMMON>                                                  52,277

<OTHER-SE>                                               120,336

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           1,324,349

<SALES>                                                  563,947

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         563,947

<CGS>                                                    404,719

<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            404,719

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0

<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           1,037

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         9,609

<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           47,842

<INCOME-TAX>                                              17,242

<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       30,600

<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0

<CHANGES>                                                      0

<NET-INCOME>                                              30,600

<EPS-BASIC>                                                 0.62

<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0.61



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          11,705
<RECEIVABLES>                                  564,328
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                 21
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                          219,919
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            132,023
<PP&E>                                          14,187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 965,177
<SHORT-TERM>                                    39,301
<PAYABLES>                                     230,769
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                            213,996
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              47,438
<LONG-TERM>                                     40,296
<COMMON>                                           107
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,242
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   965,177
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                 9022
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                             13962
<COMMISSIONS>                                    25863
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                     5745
<FEE-REVENUE>                                     5323
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                7439
<COMPENSATION>                                   35430
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3370
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2064
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5260 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5260

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the phasedown of 
        the credit percentage for the dependent care tax credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2010

  Ms. Schwartz (for herself and Mr. McMahon) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the phasedown of 
        the credit percentage for the dependent care tax credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Support Working Parents Act of 
2010''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PHASEDOWN OF CREDIT PERCENTAGE FOR DEPENDENT CARE 
              CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 21 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to expenses for household and dependent 
care services necessary for gainful employment) is amended to read as 
follows:
    ``(a) Allowance of Credit.--In the case of an individual for which 
there are 1 or more qualifying individuals with respect to such 
individual, there shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed 
by this chapter for the taxable year an amount equal to 35 percent of 
the employment-related expenses paid by such individual during the 
taxable year.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2007183EN.01001901.xml

| 13.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 183/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 183/19

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 821/2007

of 12 July 2007

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 958/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 12 July 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 12 July 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 12 July 2007, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 shall be 39,313 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 July 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 July 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 247/2007 (OJ L 69, 9.3.2007, p. 3).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 49. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 203/2007 (OJ L 61, 28.2.2007, p. 3).

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 27(a)

The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 1997 and the Consolidated Statement
of Income and the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the six months
ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>    0000789943
<NAME>   IES INDUSTRIES INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,344,001
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    407,457
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         148,372
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        14,609
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 195,717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,110,156
<COMMON>                                       415,603
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            208,119
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 623,722
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     18,320
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           719,654
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               5,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 145,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      487
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     13,816
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                13,923
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 570,234
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,110,156
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      452,820
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            12,973<F1>
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     387,360
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     387,360<F1>
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         65,460
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                (926)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  64,534
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        30,439
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,665<F2>
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        457<F2>
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   20,665
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        31,792
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       37,780
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         102,438
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Income tax expense is not included in Operating Expense in the Consolidated
Statements of Income for IES Industries Inc. (Industries).
<F2> Since the preferred dividends are for a subsidiary of Industries, they are
considered a fixed charge on Industries' Consolidated Statement of Income.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
# L_2007241EN.01001201.xml

| 14.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 241/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 241/12

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1055/2007

of 13 September 2007

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 900/2007

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 of 27 July 2007 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2007/2008 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 of 27 July 2007 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2007/2008 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 13 September 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 13 September 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 13 September 2007, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 shall be 40,545 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 14 September 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 September 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 247/2007 (OJ L 69, 9.3.2007, p. 3).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 196, 28.7.2007, p. 26.

2

---
Exhibit 23





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement Nos. 2-64879, 2-80037, 33-18081, 33-23793, 33-41485,
33-43459, 33-45479, 33-55825, 33-58851, 33-64345, 333-8141, and
333-38131 of Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Registration Statement Nos.
33-58139, 33-64215, 33-9817, 333-30879, and 333-62847 of Sears,
Roebuck and Co. and Sears Roebuck Acceptance Corp.; Registration
Statement Nos. 33-64775, 333-18591, and 333-43309 of Sears,
Roebuck and Co. and Sears, Roebuck and Co. Deferred Compensation
Plan; Registration Statement Nos. 33-57205, 333-11973, 333-53149,
and 333-92501 of Sears Roebuck and Co. and the Sears 401(k)
Profit Sharing Plan (formerly, The Savings and Profit Sharing
Fund of Sears Employees); and Registration Statement No. 33-44671
of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears DC Corp.; of our report dated
February 7, 2000, incorporated by reference in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Sears, Roebuck and Co. for the year ended January
1, 2000.


/S/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 22, 2000
#### BUNDY v. BOARD OF EDUCATION

No. 38 PC.

Case below: 5 N.C. App. 397.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 29 August 1969.
[DESCRIPTION]    COVER PAGE
              U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                     Washington, D.C. 20549

                           FORM 10-QSB
(Mark One)

[ x ]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

        For the quarterly period ended June 30, 1998

[   ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the transition period from __________ to __________

                      Commission file number: 0-2664

                       INVESTORS FINANCE, INC.
   (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
                        ___________________

		Hawaii				   99-0112763
	(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
	incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

	50 South Beretania Street, Honolulu, Hawaii	96813
	(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

                 Issuer's telephone number: (808) 533-7437
___________________

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or 
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such 
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days.  Yes [   ] No[ x ]

Number of shares outstanding of the issuer's common stock as of
June 30, 1998: 1,549,698

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes [  ]  No [ x ]
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Glenn R. Richter, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Sears, Roebuck and Co. (the Company), has executed this
certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 28, 2002 (the Report).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of
the 12th day of March, 2003.

|                                                                                       | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Glenn R. Richter
Glenn R Richter
Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer |
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Signature: | /s/      Steven G. Rolls                         |
|--------|------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|   |       | Steven      G. RollsChief      Financial Officer |

|   | Date: | August      11, 2008 |
|--------|-------|----------------------|