alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5609 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 13, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 to prohibit 

any person from performing lobbying activities on behalf 

of a client which is determined by the Secretary of State 

to be a State sponsor of terrorism. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5609 RFS

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES ON BE2 HALF OF STATE SPONSORS OF TERRORISM. 

3 The Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1601 

4 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following 

5 new section: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 27. PROHIBITING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES ON BEHALF 

7 OF STATE SPONSORS OF TERRORISM. 

8 ‘‘No person may perform lobbying activities on behalf 

9 of a client which is a country the government of which 

10 the Secretary of State has determined, for purposes of sec11 tion 6(j) of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (as 

12 continued in effect pursuant to the International Emer13 gency Economic Powers Act), section 40 of the Arms Ex14 port Control Act, section 620A of the Foreign Assistance 

15 Act of 1961, or any other provision of law, is a government 

16 that has repeatedly provided support for acts of inter17 national terrorism.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 1, 2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 7312** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. SAIED MOUSA RAMADAN , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Robert E. Payne , Senior District Judge. ( 3:05

- cr - 00024

- REP; 3:08

- cv - 00179 )

Submitted : July 28, 2010 Decided: August 9, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per cur iam opinion
. Saied Mousa Ramadan, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia N. Hawkins, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Saied Mousa Ramadan seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of ap pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jur ists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedu ral grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the recor d and conclude that Ramadan has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Ramadan’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 present ed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, John B. Wood, Chief Executive Officer of Telos Corporation, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Telos Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly represent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors: 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 14, 2004
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION





PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS
(a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
CODE)





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officers of Sancon Resources Recovery, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"), do hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-Q Report") that:




(1) the
10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the
information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Sancon
Resources Recovery, Inc.








Date:   May
15, 2009


By:
/s/ Jack Chen


Jack
Chen


Chief
Executive Officer





Date:   May
15, 2009


By:
/s/ Gary Li


Gary
Li


Chief
Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000052617
<NAME> IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          51,871
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          11,333
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,356
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     26,886
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          60,313
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            60,949
<LOANS>                                        584,274
<ALLOWANCE>                                      8,594
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,411,826
<DEPOSITS>                                     709,499
<SHORT-TERM>                                   436,612
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             82,835
<LONG-TERM>                                      8,190
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,965
<OTHER-SE>                                      96,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,411,826
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 41,718
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,518
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                25,034
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                71,270
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              15,219
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,262
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           38,788
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    5,055
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                136,047
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,906
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      33,906
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,276
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.59<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.59
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     .04<F1>
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,292
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,301
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,875
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,201
<RECOVERIES>                                       335
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                8,594
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             8,594
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,104
<FN>
<F1>information not in 1,000
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7566

WILLIAM JEFFERY HARPER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DAVID CHESTER, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-98-184-5-HC-H) Submitted: April 13, 1999 Decided: June 1, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Jeffery Harper, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: William Jeffery Harper seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harper v. Chester , No. CA-98-184-5-HC-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 22, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Thomas Gurkowski, Secretary/Treasurer and CFO of Timberline Resources Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Quarterly Report on 10QSB of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: February 21, 2006.



/s/ Thomas Gurkowski

_______________________

Thomas Gurkowski

(Secretary/Treasurer and CFO)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER ADOPTING NEW RULE 113.1,
AMENDING RULE S 560 AND 575 AND
REVISING THE COMMENT TO RULE

578 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES
OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE :

:

:

:

:

:

: NO. 500

CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5 th day of January

, 201 8 , upon the recommendation of the
Criminal Procedural Rules Committee ; the proposal having been published before adoption at 47 Pa.B. 4674 ( August 1 2 , 2017)

, and a Final Report to be published with
this ORDER :

It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania

that Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 113.1 is adopted, Rules of Criminal
Procedure 560 and 575 are amended and the Comment to Pennsylvania Rule of
Criminal Procedure 578 is revised

, in the attached form.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall
be effective January 6 , 201 8

.

Additions to the rule s are shown in bold and are underlined.

De letions from the rule s are shown in bold and brackets.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Lolo and Kootenai National Forests' Sanders County Resource Advisory Committee will meet on November 17 at 7 p.m. in Thompson Falls, Montana for a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

# DATES:

November 17, 2005.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Thompson Falls Courthouse, 1111 Main Street, Thompson Falls, MT 59873.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Randy Hojem, Designated Federal Official (DFO), District Ranger, Plains Ranger District, Lolo National Forest at (406) 826-3821.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda topics include reviewing progress on current RAC projects, and receiving public comment. If the meeting location is changed, notice will be posted in the local newspapers, including the Clark Fork Valley Press, and Sanders County Ledger.

Dated: November 1, 2005.

Randy Hojem, 

DFO, Plains Ranger District, Lolo National Forest.

[FR Doc. 05-22353 Filed 11-8-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5633 

To improve choices for consumers for vehicles, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 29, 2010 

Ms. HERSETH SANDLIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To improve choices for consumers for vehicles, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Consumer Vehicle 

5 Choice Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ENSURING THE AVAILABILITY OF DUAL FUELED 

7 AUTOMOBILES AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCKS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 329 of title 49, United 

9 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 32902 

10 the following: 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5633 IH

1 ‘‘§ 32902A. Requirement to manufacture dual fueled 

2 automobiles and light duty trucks 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—For each model year listed in the 

4 following table, each manufacturer shall ensure that the 

5 percentage of automobiles and light duty trucks manufac6 tured by the manufacturer for sale in the United States 

7 that are dual fueled automobiles and light duty trucks is 

8 not less than the percentage set forth for that model year 

9 in the following table: 

‘‘Model Year Percentage 

Model years 2011 and 2012 ........................................................... 50 percent

Model year 2013 and each subsequent model year ........................ 90 percent. 

10 ‘‘(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to 

11 automobiles or light duty trucks that operate only on elec12 tricity.’’. 

13 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

14 for chapter 329 of title 49, United States Code, is amend15 ed by inserting after the item relating to section 32902 

16 the following: 

‘‘32902A. Requirement to manufacture dual fueled automobiles and light duty 

trucks.’’. 

17 (c) RULEMAKING.—Not later than 1 year after the 

18 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Trans19 portation shall prescribe regulations to carry out the 

20 amendments made by this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Interstate Power and Light Company (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ William D. Harvey

William D. Harvey

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

/s/ Eliot G. Protsch

Eliot G. Protsch

Chief Financial Officer

 

August 6, 2007
Exhibit 23.1











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






The Board of Directors and Stockholders


BSD Medical Corporation




We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-162080 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-157025, No. 333-142973, and No. 333-50588 on Form S-8 of BSD Medical Corporation of our reports dated November 29, 2010 with respect to the financial statements and internal control over financial reporting of BSD Medical Corporation contained in BSD Medical Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2010.








/s/ Tanner LLC








Salt Lake City, Utah


November 29, 2010
#### Michael L. JONES, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Janice PHILLIPS, head of medical at South Carolina Department of Corrections; Medical Staff, at Manning Correctional Institution; Medical Staff, at Lee Correctional Institution, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 04-7936, 04-7955.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 25, 2005.

Decided April 12, 2005.

Michael L. Jones, Appellant pro se. Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II, Willcox, Buyck *&*Williams, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Michael L. Jones appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Jones v. Phillips,*No. CA-03-3203-3 (D.S.C. Oct. 27, 2004). Jones’ motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5591 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5591

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the airport traffic control tower located at Spokane 
   International Airport in Spokane, Washington, as the ``Ray Daves 
                    Airport Traffic Control Tower''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The airport traffic control tower located at Spokane International 
Airport in Spokane, Washington, and any successor airport traffic 
control tower at that location, shall be known and designated as the 
``Ray Daves Airport Traffic Control Tower''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the airport traffic control tower 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ray 
Daves Airport Traffic Control Tower''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5591

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To designate the airport traffic control tower located at Spokane 
   International Airport in Spokane, Washington, as the ``Ray Daves 
                    Airport Traffic Control Tower''.
```