alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000051387
<NAME> INTERNATIONAL MERCANTILE CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          313,395
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,133,513
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   313,395
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5382 

To provide for a temporary freeze on the pay of civilian employees of the 

Federal Government. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2010 

Mrs. BACHMANN (for herself and Mr. CANTOR) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide for a temporary freeze on the pay of civilian 

employees of the Federal Government. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PAY FREEZE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, for purposes of computing compensation for 

6 service performed during fiscal year 2011 and the first 

7 quarter of fiscal year 2012, the rate of salary or basic 

8 pay for any office or position within the civil service, as 

9 defined by section 2101 of title 5, United States Code, 

10 shall be deemed to be equal to the rate of salary or basic 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5382 IH

1 pay payable for such office or position as of September 

2 30, 2010. 

3 (b) RULE FOR NEW POSITIONS.—For purposes of 

4 subsection (a), the rate of salary or basic pay payable as 

5 of September 30, 2010, for any office or position which 

6 was not in existence on such date shall be deemed to be 

7 the rate of salary or basic pay payable to individuals in 

8 comparable offices or positions on such date. 

9 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec10 tion shall be considered to apply with respect to any office 

11 or position within the uniformed services, as defined by 

12 section 2101 of title 5, United States Code. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
# L_2007160EN.01001601.xml

| 21.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 160/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 160/16

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 695/2007

of 20 June 2007

determining the extent to which applications lodged in June 2007 for import licences for certain pigmeat sector products pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1233/2006 can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1233/2006 of 16 August 2006 opening and providing for the administration of an import tariff quota of pigmeat allocated to the United States of America (1), and in particular Article 5(5) thereof,

Whereas:

The applications for import licences lodged for the period 1 July to 30 September 2007 are less than the quantities available and can therefore be fulfilled entirely,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 July to 30 September 2007 submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1233/2006 shall be met as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

2.   Application for import licences for the period 1 October to 31 December 2007 may be lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1233/2006 for the total quantity as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 June 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 June 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 225, 17.8.2006, p. 14.

1

---

ANNEX

| Order No | Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period of 1.7.2007-30.9.2007 | Total quantity available for the period of 1.10.2007-31.12.2007
  (t) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 09.4170 | 100 | 1 781,625 |

Order No

Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period of 1.7.2007-30.9.2007

Total quantity available for the period of 1.10.2007-31.12.2007

(t)

09.4170

100

1 781,625

---
#### James W. Bartlett *&*wife *vs.*A. W. Farrington.

Suffolk.

March 16.

May 5, 1876.

Colt & Lord, JJ., absent

Repeated entries by the lessor upon leased premises, and carrying away of crops, cutting down a fruit tree, and removing a cooking stove from the house, though acts of trespass, do not amount in law to an eviction of the tenant.

Damages suffered by a lessee by the lessor’s trespasses upon the leased premises cannot be set up by way of recoupment, in an action by the lessor .for the rent reserved.

Morton, J.

To constitute an eviction which will operate as a suspension of rent, there 'must either be an actual expulsion of the tenant, or some act of a permanent character, done by the landlord with the intention and effect of depriving the tenant of the enjoyment of the demised premises or some part of it, to which he yields, abandoning the possession within a reasonable time, *Royce*v. *Guggenheim,*106 Mass. 201. *De Witt*v. *Pierson,*112 Mass. 8. *Mirick*v. *Hoppin,*118 Mass. 582.

In the case at bar, the defendant occupied the demised premises under a lease for three years, commencing July 1,1874, until September 26, 1874, when he left the premises. This suit is for the quarter’s rent due October 1, 1874. The defendant’s evi*285deuce tended to show that the plaintiffs from time to time entered upon the premises and gathered the flowers and the annual crops, cut down a partly decayed apple tree, and, on the day when the defendant vacated the house, removed a cooking stove Lrom the kitchen. These were not acts done by the landlord with the purpose and effect of permanently depriving the tenant of the enjoyment of the premises. If they were not justifiable under some agreement with the tenant, they were trespasses for which he has an action at law, but they did not amount to an eviction which excuses him from payment of the rent. The rulings at the trial upon this point were correct.

*I. W.*Richardson, for the defendant.

*N. B.*Bryant, for the plaintiffs.

Treating these acts of the plaintiffs as trespasses, the court rightly ruled that the defendant could not in this action recoup the damages he sustained by reason of them. As stated by Bigelow, C. J., in *Sawyer*v. Wiswell, 9 Allen, 39, one of the essential elements upon which the right to recoup depends is “ that the damages which the defendant seeks to set off shall have arisen from the same subject matter, or sprung out of the same contract or transaction as that on which the plaintiff relies to maintain his action.” In this case the plaintiffs’ claim is for rent under 'the covenants of a *lease;*the defendant seeks to set off damages sustained by a trespass or trespasses. The two causes of action are independent, and do not arise out of the same contract or cause of action, within the principle which al lows a recoupment. *Exceptions overruled.*
NO. 07-08-0363-CR

NO. 07-08-0364-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

DECEMBER 8, 2008

______________________________

DONALD ELIJAH MATTHEWS, JR.,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 47th DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NOS. 57, 858-A and 57, 859-A; HON. HAL MINER, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Abatement and Remand

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

Donald Elijah Matthews, Jr. appeals his convictions for assault and violation of a

protective order. The clerk has filed extensions of time to file the clerk’s records, which

extensions were granted to December 17, 2008. The reporter’s record was due on

November 17, 2008. On December 1, 2008, the Court notified the reporter by letter that

the record was overdue, and in response, the reporter stated that appellant neither

submitted a request for preparation of the record nor made arrangements to pay for it. 
2

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 47 District Court th

of Potter County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall

immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to

determine the following:

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals; 

 2. whether appellant is indigent;

3. whether the appellant is entitled to free appellate records due to his

indigency; 

4. when the reporter’s record can reasonably be filed (given the length of

trial and size of the record) in a manner that does not unduly delay the

prosecution of this appeal.

The trial court shall 1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing

the foregoing issues, and 2) cause to be developed supplemental clerk’s records

containing its findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders it may issue as a result

of its hearing in this matter. Additionally, the district court shall then cause the

supplemental records to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before January 7, 2009.

 Should further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must

be requested before January 7, 2009. Finally, appellant is informed that if he is not

indigent and fails to make arrangements or pay for the reporter’s record, the appeal will be

dismissed. Rodriguez v. State, 970 S.W.2d 133, 135 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 1998, pet. ref’d).

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
```

                                                                                                       EXHIBIT 99.1

                                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Navistar Financial Corporation (the "Company"), subsidiary of
International Truck and Engine Corporation, on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John J. Bongiorno, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
            of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
            condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/  John J. Bongiorno
     John J. Bongiorno
     Chief Executive Officer
     September 13, 2002

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

                                                        E-1

                                                                                                       EXHIBIT 99.2

                                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Navistar Financial Corporation (the "Company"), subsidiary of
International Truck and Engine Corporation, on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew J. Cederoth, Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
            of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
            condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/  Andrew J. Cederoth
     Andrew J. Cederoth
     Principal Financial Officer
     September 13, 2002

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

                                                        E-2
```
# L_2007323EN.01005601.xml

| 8.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 323/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 323/56

---

COUNCIL DECISION 2007/808/CFSP

of 6 December 2007

amending Decision 2006/807/CFSP on the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2005/797/CFSP of 14 November 2005 on the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (1), and in particular Article 14(2) thereof, in conjunction with the second indent of Article 23(2) of the Treaty on European Union,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 14 November 2005 the Council adopted Joint Action 2005/797/CFSP on the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian territories for a period of three years. The operational phase of the Mission started on 1 January 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 14 November 2005 the Council adopted Joint Action 2005/797/CFSP on the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian territories for a period of three years. The operational phase of the Mission started on 1 January 2006.

| (2) | On 20 November 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/807/CFSP (2) establishing that the budget intended to cover the expenditure related to the mission from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2007 was to be EUR 2 800 000. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 20 November 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/807/CFSP (2) establishing that the budget intended to cover the expenditure related to the mission from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2007 was to be EUR 2 800 000.

| (3) | This budget should also cover the expenditure related to the mission from 1 January 2007 to 29 February 2008, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

This budget should also cover the expenditure related to the mission from 1 January 2007 to 29 February 2008,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Article 1 of Decision 2006/807/CFSP should be replaced by the following:

‘Article 1

1.   The final budget intended to cover the expenditure related to the mission from 1 January 2007 to 29 February 2008 shall be EUR 2 800 000.

2.   The budget of EUPOL COPPS for the period from 1 March 2008 to 31 December 2008 shall be decided by the Council before 29 February 2008.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 6 December 2007.

For the Council

The President

A. COSTA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 300, 17.11.2005, p. 65.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 329, 25.11.2006, p. 76.

2

---
Document

Exhibit 10.18


Dynex Capital, Inc.
Non-Employee Directors’ Annual Compensation
As of January 1, 2022


Cash Compensation


Annual retainer


Non-Employee Director            $80,000


Additional annual retainers


Chairperson of the Board            $35,000


Audit Committee Chair            $20,000


Compensation Committee Chair       $10,000


Nominating & Corporate 
Governance Committee Chair     $10,000


Annual retainers are payable in quarterly installments, prorated for the number of months 
served in the case of a change during the calendar year. 


Excess meeting fee


In addition to the annual retainers, non-employee directors will also receive a cash fee of $1,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors attended above 15 meetings per year and for each Board Committee meeting attended as a member above 15 meetings per year.


Equity Compensation


Non-employee directors will also receive an annual grant of restricted shares of the Company’s common stock with a grant date fair value of $100,000, which shares will vest at the end of one year. The shares are to be granted on the first Friday following the annual meeting of shareholders.
# L_2007084DE.01004601.xml

| 24.3.2007 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 84/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2007

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 84/46

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 108/2007 der Kommission vom 5. Februar 2007 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1356/2004 hinsichtlich der Bedingungen für die Zulassung des zur Gruppe Kokzidiostatika und andere Arzneimittel zählenden Futtermittelzusatzstoffes „Elancoban“

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 31 vom 6. Februar 2007
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 31 vom 6. Februar 2007

Auf Seite 5, in der Tabelle des Anhangs, Spalte 9 „Sonstige Bestimmungen“:

Nach „Angabe in der Gebrauchsanweisung“ ist Folgendes einzufügen:

---
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We have issued our report dated March 14, 2019, with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. We consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-196702, File No. 333-206175, File No. 333-210664, 333-214607, File No. 333-220354, and File No. 333-226319) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-107438, File No. 333-144265, File No. 333-159282, File No. 333-162733, File No. 333-173854, File No. 333-181365, File No. 333- 184927, File No. 333-191572, File No. 333-205662, File No. 333-212202, File No. 333-215455, File No. 333-218642, File No. 333-222410, File No. 333-225743, and File No. 333-225744) .











/s/GRANT THORNTON LLP





New York, New York


March 14, 2019
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00069

- CR

J EFFREY D WAYNE B LANKENSHIP

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 271st District

Court

of Jack County ( 4839 )

November 30 , 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice

Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT ON REMAND

This appeal is on remand from the C o urt of Crim inal Appeals.

This court has again co n sidered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the

trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

Chie f Justice Bonnie Sudderth
August 9, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WILLIAM PRICE, SR. AND HAITHAM BAQDOUNES, Appellants

NO. 14-15-00508-CV V.

LUIS SANCHEZ, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Luis Sanchez, 

signed May 13, 2015, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected 

the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the 

court below REVERSED and RENDER judgment that appellee, Luis Sanchez, 

take nothing on his claims for conversion and attorney’s fees.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellee, Luis Sanchez.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# C_2007289EN.01000301.xml

| 1.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4753 — Antalis/MAP)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 289/02)

On 24 October 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4753. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4753. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---