alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2007021EN.01001501.xml

| 30.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 21/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 21/15

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 87/2007

of 29 January 2007

specifying the extent to which applications lodged in January 2007 for import certificates in respect of young male bovine animals for fattening as part of a tariff quota provided for in Regulation (EC) No 800/2006 may be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2006 of 30 May 2006 opening and providing for the administration of an import tariff quota for young male bovine animals for fattening (1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007) (2), and in particular Articles 1(4) and 4 thereof,

Whereas:

Article 1(3) of Regulation (EC) No 800/2006 lays down the number of young male bovine animals which may be imported on special terms during the period from 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007. The quantities covered by import licence applications submitted are such that applications may by accepted in full,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

All applications for import certificates made in the month of January 2007 pursuant to Article 3(3), second subparagraph, third indent, of Regulation (EC) No 800/2006 are hereby met in full.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 30 January 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 January 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 144, 31.5.2006, p. 7.

2

---
<PAGE>
                                       24

Exhibit 99.3




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of AFP Imaging Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Elise Nissen, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
         15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
         Company.


/s/ Elise Nissen

Elise Nissen,
Chief Financial Officer
September 26, 2002
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ameriprise Certificate Company (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Abu M. Arif, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Ross P. Palacios, as Principal and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/   Abu M. Arif      |                            |
|------------------------|---------------------------------|
| Name:                  | Abu   M. Arif                   |   |
| Title:                 | Chief   Executive Officer       |   |
|                   | (Principal   Executive Officer) |   |
| Date:                  | July 31,   2013            |   |
|                   |                            |
|                   |                            |
| /s/   Ross P. Palacios |                            |
| Name:                  | Ross   P. Palacios              |   |
| Title:                 | Chief   Financial Officer       |   |
|                   | (Principal   Financial Officer) |   |
| Date:                  | July 31,   2013            |   |

 

E-4

----
Order entered April 21, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00031-CR

No. 05-22-00032-CR

No. 05-22-00033-CR

No. 05-22-00034-CR

No. 05-22-00035-CR

No. 05-22-00036-CR

DAVID RAY JAKUBIEC, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F21-75233-X, F21-75234-X, F21-40264-X, F21-40265-

X, F21-48147-X & F21-75235-X

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s April 19, 2022 second motion for an 

extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER 

appellant’s brief due by May 20, 2022.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 545 

To rename the Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area in 

the State of Idaho as the Morley Nelson Snake River Birds of Prey 

National Conservation Area in honor of the late Morley Nelson, an 

international authority on birds of prey, who was instrumental in the 

establishment of this National Conservation Area, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 14, 2009 

Mr. SIMPSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To rename the Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area in the State of Idaho as the Morley Nelson 

Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area 

in honor of the late Morley Nelson, an international 

authority on birds of prey, who was instrumental in 

the establishment of this National Conservation Area, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Morley Nelson Snake 

5 River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area Act’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 545 IH

1 SEC. 2. RENAMING OF SNAKE RIVER BIRDS OF PREY NA2 TIONAL CONSERVATION AREA. 

3 (a) RENAMING.—Public Law 103–64 is amended— 

4 (1) in section 2(2) (16 U.S.C. 460iii–1(2)), by 

5 inserting ‘‘Morley Nelson’’ before ‘‘Snake River 

6 Birds of Prey National Conservation Area’’; and 

7 (2) in section 3(a)(1) (16 U.S.C. 460iii– 

8 2(a)(1)), by inserting ‘‘Morley Nelson’’ before 

9 ‘‘Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation 

10 Area’’. 

11 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg12 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

13 States to the Snake River Birds of Prey National Con14 servation Area shall be deemed to be a reference to the 

15 Morley Nelson Snake River Birds of Prey National Con16 servation Area. 

17 (c) TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.—Public Law 103–64 

18 is further amended— 

19 (1) in section 3(a)(1) (16 U.S.C. 460iii– 

20 2(a)(1)), by striking ‘‘(hereafter referred to as the 

21 ‘conservation area’)’’; and 

22 (2) in section 4 (16 U.S.C. 460iii–3)— 

23 (A) in subsection (a)(2), by striking ‘‘Con24 servation Area’’ and inserting ‘‘conservation 

25 area’’; and 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 545 IH

1 (B) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘Visitors 

2 Center’’ and inserting ‘‘visitors center’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ameriprise Certificate
Company (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), William F. Truscott, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and
Brian J. McGrane, as Principal and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or
              15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



/s/ William F. Truscott
-----------------------
Name:    William F. Truscott
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
Date:    November 7, 2006



/s/ Brian J. McGrane
--------------------
Name:    Brian J. McGrane
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:    November 7, 2006
Order entered September 23 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 01158

- CV

TRAILBLAZER HEALTH E NTERPRISES, LLC AND BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIE LD OF SOUTH CAROLINA , Appellant s

V.

BOXER F2, L.P., Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 07070



### O RDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of today’s date, we DENY appellants’ petition for

permission to appeal amended order on motions for summary judgment, allowing int erlocutory

appeal and staying case signed August 6, 2013 . We ORDER that appellants bear the costs of

this appeal.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.2


 


February 28, 2022


 


Darin Billerbeck


9420 Hawkshead Road


Reno, Nevada 89521


 


Re: First Amendment to Offer Letter


 


Dear Darin:


 


Reference is made to the Offer
Letter by and between you and Everspin Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), dated December 30, 2020 (the
 “Offer Letter”). This letter (this “First Amendment”) amends the terms and conditions of the Offer
Letter and shall become effective on March 14, 2022. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment but not defined herein have the meanings
set forth in your Offer Letter.


 


As you know, effective March 14,
2022, Sanjeev Aggarwal will assume the role of President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. In connection with Sanjeev’s
appointment, you will resign your position as interim Chief Executive Officer and will continue as an “at will” employee of
the Company, in the role of Executive Chairman, through December 31, 2022. As Executive Chairman you will report to the Board of
Directors and will support strategic initiatives identified by the Board of Directors and/or the President and Chief Executive Officer.


 


In consideration for your
services as Executive Chairman, and subject to approval by the Board of Directors and other necessary approvals, you will granted 62,000
restricted stock units (“RSUs”), with such RSUs vesting monthly through the end of 2022 so long as you remain Executive
Chairman through each monthly vesting date. The RSUs will be governed by the terms and conditions of the Equity Incentive Plan and the
award agreement that you will be required to sign to accept the RSUs.


 


Effective March 14, 2022,
your Base Salary will be reduced to the annual rate of $35,568 (or such higher amount that equates to the applicable minimum wage). You
will not be eligible to participate in the Company’s 2022 Executive Bonus Program. As previously approved by the Compensation Committee
of the Board, your $6,000 monthly housing stipend will remain in place through November of 2022.


 


Except as amended by the terms of this Amendment,
the Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect. All questions concerning the construction, validity and interpretation of this
Amendment will be governed by the laws of the State of Arizona.


 


We are excited at the prospect
of you moving into the Executive Chairman role. If you have any questions about this First Amendment, please let me know. If you are in
agreement with the terms of this First Amendment, please sign below and return this First Amendment to me.


 


	 	Everspin Technologies, Inc.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Anuj Aggarwal
	 	 
	 	Accepted:
	 	 
	 	/s/ Darin Billerbeck
	 	Darin Billerbeck
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                Jan-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                         4,884,572
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,783,759
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,284,214
<PP&E>                                        69,254,649
<DEPRECIATION>                                44,723,675
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                40,585,397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,570,207
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  40,585,397
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,058,929
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,197,577
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               445,886
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        0
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,415,467
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0



</TABLE>
#### BARBARA R. OLSAN, Appellant, v. EMANUEL COMORA, Respondent.

No. 7850

October 17, 1975

541 P.2d 662

*Morse, Foley & Wadsworth, Loeb and Loeb,*and *Andrew S. Garb,*Las Vegas, for Appellant.

*Jones, Jones, Bell, LeBaron, Close, Bilbray & Kaufman,*Las Vegas, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

This is an appeal from a denial of a Rule 60(b) motion seeking to set aside an ordej of the district court directing the issuance of a'writ of mandamus.

*622We have reviewed the record below, and we have concluded that appellant did make a sufficient showing of mistake and excusable neglect to warrant relief under NRCP 60(b) (1). Morris v. Morris, 86 Nev. 45, 464 P.2d 471 (1970); Hotel Last Frontier Corp. v. Frontier Properties, Inc., 79 Nev. 150, 380 P.2d 293 (1963). Therefore, we reverse and remand the case for further proceedings in the court below.
EXHIBIT 12(b)

          COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF INCOME TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
                     AND PREFERRED SHARE DIVIDENDS
           SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                               Year Ended
                               -----------------------------------------
(millions, except ratios)          1996            1995         1994
<S>                              <C>             <C>          <C>
Fixed Charges
  Interest and amortization 
   of debt discount and 
   expense on all indebtedness    $1,365          $1,373       $1,279

  Add interest element 
   implicit in rentals               121             119          114
                                  ------          ------       ------
                                   1,486           1,492        1,393
  Preferred dividend factor           41              89          234
  Interest capitalized                 5               4            1
                                  ------          ------       ------
Total fixed charges               $1,532          $1,585       $1,628
                                  ------          ------       ------
                                  ------          ------       ------
Income
  Income from 
   continuing operations          $1,271          $1,025         $857
  Deduct undistributed net 
    income (loss)of 
    unconsolidated companies           8               9           (7)
                                  ------          ------       -------
                                   1,263           1,016          864
Add
  Fixed charges (excluding 
   interest capitalized and 
   preferred dividend factor)      1,486           1,492        1,393
  Income taxes                       834             703          614
                                  ------          ------        -----
    Income before 
     fixed charges and
     income taxes                 $3,583          $3,211       $2,871
                                  ------          ------       ------
                                  ------          ------       ------

Ratio of income to combined 
  fixed charges and preferred 
   share dividends                  2.34            2.03         1.76
                                  ------          ------       ------
                                  ------          ------       ------

<FN>
(A) In 1996 all the outstanding 8.88% Preferred Shares, First Series were 
redeemed and thereafter the Company made no other preferred dividend 
payments.
</FN>
</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DALE E. PHILLIPS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

SOUTH COAST PLAZA; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 18

- 56070

D.C. No. 8:18

- cv

- 00812

- AG

- JDE

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 18, 2019 **

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Dale E. Phillips appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising out of a trespass warning he received from South

Coast Plaza mall . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. W e review de

novo a district court’s dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 25 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 18

- 56070

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Thompson v. Davis , 295 F.3d 890, 895

(9 th Cir. 2002), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Phillip s’s § 1983 action because

Phillips failed to allege facts sufficient to show the violation of a constitutional

right, or the presence of state action. See Naffe v. Frey , 789 F.3d 1030, 1036 (9 th

Cir. 2015) (“Dismissal of a § 1983 claim following a Rule 12 (b)(6) motion is

proper if the complaint is devoid of factual allegations that give rise to a plausible

inference of either element.”) ; id. at 1035

- 36 (setting forth elements of § 1983

claim); Brewster v. Board of Educ. of Lynwood Unified Sch

. Dist.

, 149 F.3d 971,

981 (9th Cir. 1998) (setting forth elements of procedural due process claim).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend

because amendment would have been futile. See Cervantes v. Countrywide Home

Loans, Inc.

, 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9 th Cir. 2011) (setting forth standard of review

and explaining that dismissal without leave to amend is proper when amendment

would be futile).

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.39


                   AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO MERCURY AIR GROUP, INC.
                      1998 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE OPTION PLAN
                  BY SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                                 AUGUST 22, 2000



<PAGE>   2

                                 Amendment No. 1

                             Mercury Air Group, Inc.
                      1998 Long-Term Incentive Option Plan


WHEREAS, the Paragraph 11(a) of the Corporation's 1998 Directors Stock Option
Plan currently specifically exempts Seymour Kahn under the change in control
provision; and

WHEREAS, Seymour Kahn has sold his shares of the Corporation's stock to CFK
Partners, a General Partnership under the Uniform Partnership Act of the State
of Illinois; and

WHEREAS, in accordance with section 13(d) and 14(d)(2) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Board deems it necessary of the Corporation to amend
the Corporation's 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan of the
Corporation are hereby amended as follows:

1. Paragraph 11 (a) of the 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan is hereby amended to
read in its entirety as follows:

11a) any "person"( as such is used in Section 13(d) and 14(d)(2) of the
        Securities and Exchange Act of 1934) other than CFK Partners, a General
        Partnership under the Uniform Partnership Act of the State of Illinois
        is or becomes a beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of stock of
        the Company representing 50 percent or more of the total voting power of
        the Company's then outstanding stock;



                                        2
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to**

**Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, J. Leland Strange, certify that:

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Intelligent Systems Corporation; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Date: April 24, 2020

 

|   | */s/**J. Leland Strange**          *

 J. Leland Strange

 Chief Executive Officer and President |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

----