alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.24**

Toxford Corporation 

c/o Ace International S.A. 

attn: Ms. Hélêne Ayoub 

Placede Saint Gervais 1 

P. O Box 2049 

1211 Geneva, Switzerland 

**Series A-1 andSeries A-2 Redeemable Preferred Stock**

Toxford Corporation herewith consents to an extension of the redemption date ofits 907.75 shares of Series A-1 Redeemable Preferred Stock and 1,270.85 shares of Series A-2 Redeemable Preferred Stock, issued by Telos Corporation, to August 31, 2014. This stock shall remain subject to any and all terms and conditions of thePreferred Stockholders Standby Agreement (integrated hereto by reference), entered into by Toxford Corporation on or about17th May, 2010 with Wells Fargo Capital Finance, Inc.(formerly Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc.). 

 

AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED,
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Vincent Rossi, Chief Executive Officer of St. Bernard Software, Inc. (the Small Business
Issuer), do hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that:



| | (1) | the Small Business Issuers Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report), to which this statement is filed as an
exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1034 as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Small Business Issuer.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 19, 2007
|                         | 
|By:                      |  | /s/ Vincent Rossi      
|                         |  | Vincent Rossi          
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5251 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5251

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a credit against 
           tax for birth mothers whose children are adopted.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2010

  Mrs. Schmidt (for herself, Mr. Cao, Mr. Lamborn, and Mr. Wilson of 
 South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a credit against 
           tax for birth mothers whose children are adopted.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Motherhood Fairness Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. CREDIT FOR BIRTH MOTHERS WHOSE CHILDREN ARE ADOPTED.

    (a) Allowance of Credit.--Subsection (c) of section 24 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining qualifying child) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Special rule for birth mother whose child is 
        adopted.--
                    ``(A) In general.--In the case of a taxpayer who is 
                a qualified birth mother with respect to a child, the 
                term `qualifying child' means the child born, and 
                formally placed for adoption, during the taxable year.
                    ``(B) Qualified birth mother.--For purposes of 
                subparagraph (A), the term `qualified birth mother' 
                means an individual who gives birth to the child 
                described in subparagraph (A).
                    ``(C) Credit allowed to both birth mother and 
                adoptive parent.--Notwithstanding paragraph (1) and 
                section 152(c), the credit under subsection (a) with 
                respect to a child described in subparagraph (A) for 
                the taxable year shall be allowed to both the qualified 
                birth mother of such child and the taxpayer who adopts 
                such child.''.
    (b) Identification.--Subsection (e) of section 24 of such Code is 
amended by adding at the end the following: ``For purposes of the 
preceding sentence, the Secretary shall issue guidance on appropriate 
identification of children with respect to whom a credit is allowed 
under this section by reason of subsection (c)(3).''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2007195EN.01001101.xml

| 27.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 195/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 195/11

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 886/2007

of 26 July 2007

on the issue of import licences for applications lodged for the period 1 July 2007 to 30 June 2008 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 996/97 for frozen thin skirt of bovine animals

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences (2), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 996/97 of 3 June 1997 on the opening and administration of an import tariff quota for frozen thin skirt of bovine animals falling within CN code 0206 29 91 (3) opens an import tariff quota for beef and veal products. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 996/97 of 3 June 1997 on the opening and administration of an import tariff quota for frozen thin skirt of bovine animals falling within CN code 0206 29 91 (3) opens an import tariff quota for beef and veal products.

| (2) | The applications for import licences lodged for the period 1 July 2007 to 30 June 2008 relate to quantities exceeding those available. The extent to which import licences may be issued should therefore be determined and an allocation coefficient laid down to be applied to the quantities applied for, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The applications for import licences lodged for the period 1 July 2007 to 30 June 2008 relate to quantities exceeding those available. The extent to which import licences may be issued should therefore be determined and an allocation coefficient laid down to be applied to the quantities applied for,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities for which import licence applications covered by the quota with the serial number 09.4020 have been lodged for the period 1 July 2007 to 30 June 2008 under Regulation (EC) No 996/97 shall be multiplied by an allocation coefficient of 0,970873 %.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 July 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 July 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 289/2007 (OJ L 78, 17.3.2007, p. 17).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 144, 4.6.1997, p. 6. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 568/2007 (OJ L 133, 25.5.2007, p. 15).

3

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5450 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5450

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 3894 Crenshaw Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the ``Tom 
                    Bradley Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 27, 2010

  Ms. Watson (for herself, Mr. Becerra, Mr. Berman, Mr. Bilbray, Mrs. 
Bono Mack, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Campbell, Mrs. Capps, Mr. Cardoza, Ms. Chu, 
 Mr. Costa, Mrs. Davis of California, Mr. Dreier, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Farr, 
 Mr. Filner, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Garamendi, Ms. Harman, Mr. Herger, Mr. 
   Honda, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Issa, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Lewis of 
   California, Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of California, Mr. McKeon, Ms. 
 Matsui, Mr. McCarthy of California, Mr. McClintock, Mr. McNerney, Mr. 
  Gary G. Miller of California, Mr. George Miller of California, Mr. 
Nunes, Mr. Radanovich, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Royce, Ms. Linda T. Sanchez 
   of California, Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California, Mr. Schiff, Ms. 
Speier, Mr. Stark, Mr. Thompson of California, Ms. Waters, Ms. Woolsey, 
Ms. Richardson, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mrs. Napolitano, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of 
   California, Mr. Baca, Mr. Sherman, and Mr. Waxman) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 3894 Crenshaw Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the ``Tom 
                    Bradley Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TOM BRADLEY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3894 Crenshaw Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Tom Bradley Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Tom 
Bradley Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30922

JULIO C. ARANA Plaintiff-Appellee
versus OCHSNER HEALTH PLAN Defendant-Appellant

- - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Louisiana

- - - - - ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion August 15, 2002, 5 Cir., 2002,

_____ F.3d

____ ) January 16, 2003 BEFORE: KING, Chief Judge, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES,

SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,175,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,385,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,560,000
<PP&E>                                     194,511,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,515,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             212,860,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,119,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       56,021,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       921,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,732,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               212,860,000
<SALES>                                     83,213,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            83,213,000
<CGS>                                       47,602,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               47,602,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,275,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             24,487,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 9,720,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         14,767,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,051,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                13,716,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the annual report of Inter-Tel,  Incorporated (the "Company")
on Form  10-K  for the  period  ended  December  31,  2002,  as  filed  with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Kurt R. Kneip,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  hereby certify as of the Date hereof,  solely
for purposes of Title 18,  Chapter 63,  Section 1350 of the United  States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:

1)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
     as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Date: March 19, 2003

/s/ Kurt R. Kneip
---------------------------------
Kurt R. Kneip
Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 4 NAVISTAR FINANCIAL CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARIES   INSTRUMENTS DEFINING RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS,
INCLUDING INDENTURES The following instruments of Navistar Financial Corporation defining the rights
of security holders are incorporated herein by reference:  4.1
    
    Credit Agreement for $820,000,000 Revolving Credit and Competitive
Advance Facility dated as of December 8, 2000, between the Corporation,
Arrendadora Financiera Navistar, S.A. de C.V., Servicios Financieros
Navistar, S.A. de C.V. and Navistar Comercial, S.A. de C.V., as borrowers,
lenders party hereto, The Chase Manhattan Bank as Administrative Agent,
Bank of America as Syndication Agent and Bank of Nova Scotia as
Documentation Agent. Filed as Exhibit 10.05 to Navistar Financial
Corporations Form 10-Q dated March 15, 2001. Commission File No.
1-4146-1.4.2
    
    Guarantee, dated as of December 8, 2000, made by Navistar, in favor of
The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Administrative Agent, for the lenders parties
to the Credit Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2000, among Navistar
Financial Corporation and Arrendadora Financiera Navistar, S.A. DE C.V.,
Servicios Financieros Navistar, S.A. DE C.V. and Navistar Comercial, S.A.
DE C.V., the Lenders, Bank of America, N.A., as syndication agent, The
Bank of Nova Scotia, as documentation agent, and the Administrative Agent.
Filed as Exhibit 10.07 to Navistar Financial Corporations Form 10-Q
dated March 15, 2001. Commission File No. 1-4146-1.4.3
    
    Indenture dated as of March 25, 2002 by and among the Corporation,
Navistar and The BNY Midwest Trust Company, as Trustee, for 4.75%
Subordinated Exchangeable Notes due 2009 for $220,000,000. Filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to Form S-3 dated May 7, 2002. Filed on Registration No.
333-87716.4.4
    
    Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 25, 2002, by and among
the Corporation, Navistar, Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. and Banc of America
Securities, LLC. Filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Form S-3 dated May 7, 2002.
Filed on Registration No. 333-87716. E-10
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-17-00236-CR

MYRON JAMAL NASH

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from 

Criminal District Court No. 1

of Tarrant County (1482186D)

September 20, 2018

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
<PAGE>

               EPIC RESORTS AND SUBSIDIARIES

Epic Resorts, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Epic Resorts - Palm Springs Marquis Villas, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company

Epic Resorts - Westpark Resort, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Epic Resorts - Scottsdale Links Resort, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company

London Bridge Resort, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Epic Resorts - Hilton Head, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Epic Resorts - Afton Resort, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Daytona Beach Regency, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Resort Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company(3)

Resort Investment, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Epic Capital Corp., a Delaware corporation

Epic Warrant Co., a Delaware corporation

Epic Receivables, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Epic Membership Corp., a Delaware corporation

Epic Travel, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Epic Resorts - Vacation Showplace, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Epic Resorts Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company(2)

Epic Marketing, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company(3)

Epic Vacation Club, a Delaware non-profit corporation

Epic Master Funding Corporation, a Delaware corporation(4)

Epic Resorts - Planters Quarters, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Epic Receivables 1999, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company(4)


-------------------
(1) all are direct subsidiaries of Epic Resorts, LLC except Daytona Beach
    Regency, Ltd.

(2) property management arm of Epic Vacation Club

(3) one percent interest held by Epic Membership Corp.

(4) special purpose corporation for mortgage and/or club receivables

(5) non-profit condominium owners association

<PAGE>

Daytona Beach Regency Association, Inc., a Florida non-profit corporation(5)

Resort Association, Inc., an Arizona non-profit corporation(5)

Scottsdale Links Condominium Association, an Arizona non-profit corporation(5)

Island Links Resort Owners Association, Inc., a South Carolina non-profit
corporation(5)

Palm Springs Marquis Villas Owners Association, a California non-profit
   Mutual Benefit Corporation(5)

Desert Paradise Resort Owners Association, a Nevada Non-profit corporation(5)
### NUMBER 13

- 13

- 00 239

- CR



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

ISID O RO BERRO , A ppellant ,

v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

On a ppeal from the 1 48 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Isid o ro Berro , attempts to appeal a conviction for theft . The trial court

has certified that “ the defendant has waived the right of appeal. ” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 25.2(a)(2).2

On May 7, 2013 , this Court notified appellant ’ s counsel of the trial court ’ s
certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether

appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to th is Court, by letter, counsel ’ s findings

as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the

existence of any amended certification.

On June 3, 2013 , counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel ’ s response
does not establish: (1) that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect, or

(2) that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be

dismissed if the trial court ’ s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of

appeal. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this

appeal is DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the 13th day of June, 20 13

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN FORM 10-Q FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           4,693
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,084
<INVENTORY>                                      2,657
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,670
<PP&E>                                          46,125
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,240
<BONDS>                                         39,196
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,354
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,106
<SALES>                                         56,851
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,532
<CGS>                                           52,657
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,811
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,220
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   272
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 797
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,352
<INCOME-TAX>                                       940
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,412
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,412
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>