alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 18 , 2015.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00532

- CV

APARTMENT EXPRESS LL C , Appellant

V.

SOUTHCHASE NORTH APA RTMENTS , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 3

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1062291

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 10 , 2015. The notice of appeal was filed June 16, 2015

. 1 To date, our records show that appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in

1 We note that Apartment Express LLC is named in the notice of appeal signed by Datril Boston, who is not a party to the appeal or a licensed attorney. Except for the performance of ministerial tasks, corporations may app ear and be represented only by a licensed attorney. Kunstoplast of Am., Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp ., U.S.A., 937 S.W.2d 455, 456 (Tex. 1996)

.2

civil cases unless party is excused by statute or by appellate rules from paying costs). Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 51.207.

O n July 21, 2015 , this court ordered appellant to pay the appellate filing fee
on or before August 5 , 2015, or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3 (c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Brown

.
Document

Exhibit 10.36

AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO TERMINATION AGREEMENT AND RELEASE




This Amendment No. 1 to the Termination Agreement and Release is entered into as of
December 28, 2021, between The Falkirk Mining Company, an Ohio corporation (“Falkirk”),
NoDak Energy Investments Corporation, a Nevada corporation (“NoDak”), and Great River
Energy, a Minnesota cooperative corporation (“GRE”).


RECITALS


WHEREAS, Falkirk and GRE have entered into a Termination and Release Agreement,
dated as of June 30, 2021, (the “Agreement”);


WHEREAS, NoDak is a party to the Agreement for purposes of Section 4, Section 12 and Section 17; and


WHEREAS, Falkirk, NoDak and GRE desire to amend the Agreement as hereinafter
provided.


AGREEMENT


NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:


1.     Section 15.e. of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:


e.     by either GRE or Falkirk, upon Notice to the other Party, if the transactions contemplated at the Closing have not been consummated by September 30, 2022 (the “Outside Date); provided that neither Party will be entitled to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this if such Party’s breach of this Agreement has prevented the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.


[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
























1



Exhibit 10.36



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement effective as of December 28, 2021.




GREAT RIVER ENERGY,
a Minnesota cooperative corporation




By:   /s/ Eric J. Olsen                   


Printed Name: Eric J. Olsen


Title: Vice President and General Counsel






THE FALKIRK MINING COMPANY,
an Ohio corporation




By:   /s/ John D. Neumann                 


Printed Name: John D. Neumann


Title: Secretary






NODAK ENERGY INVESTMENTS CORPORATION,
a Nevada corporation




By:   /s/ John D. Neumann                 


Printed Name: John D. Neumann


Title: Secretary
2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5603 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5603

  To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to make available to Guam, 
   American Samoa, the Virgin Islands of the United States, and the 
   Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands additional funds for 
                community service senior opportunities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2010

  Mr. Sablan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to make available to Guam, 
   American Samoa, the Virgin Islands of the United States, and the 
   Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands additional funds for 
                community service senior opportunities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 506(a)(2) of the Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 
3056d(a)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``0.75 percent'' and inserting ``1.0 
        percent'',
            (2) in subparagraph (A) by striking ``30 percent'' and 
        inserting ``25 percent'', and
            (3) in subparagraph (B) by striking ``10 percent'' and 
        inserting ``25 percent''.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.

    The amendments made by this Act shall not apply with respect to 
funds appropriated before the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 13-1930

___________________________ Sandra H. Harp lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v. Navarre Logistical Services, Inc.; Davi d Ginsberg; Margot McManus; Micki St. Clair, as agents for Navarre Logistical Services, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________ Submitted: January 29, 2014 Filed: February 7, 2014 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Sandra Harp appeals from the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her pro se action claiming that her former employer terminated her based on her race, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Upon careful de novo review, see Olsen v. Capital Region Med. Ctr. , 713 F.3d 1149, 1153 (8th Cir. 2013), we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment because the admissible evidence before the court woul d not permit a factfinder to conclude that defendants’ proffered reason for fi ring Harp was pretextual. See Twymon v. Wells Fargo & Co. , 462 F.3d 925, 935 (8th Cir. 2006) (plaintiff failed to show proffered reason for termination was pretext where she did not assert that employer did not honestly believe she was accountable for viol ations of policy when it fired her for those violations). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and reco mmendations of the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,156
<SECURITIES>                                    14,417
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,626
<ALLOWANCES>                                       250
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         323,840
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,288
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 333,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        233,693
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   333,788
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,593
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,368
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,095
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (506)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,362
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    347
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                347
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       347
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        

</TABLE>
# C_2007246EN.01000401.xml

| 20.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4742 — Oxbow/SSM)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 246/02)

On 7 August 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4742. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4742. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 515 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 3, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the importation of certain low-level radioactive 

waste into the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 515 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Radioactive Import 

3 Deterrence Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF IMPORTATION. 

5 (a) AMENDMENT.—Chapter 19 of the Atomic Energy 

6 Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2015 et seq.) is amended by in7 serting after section 276 the following new section: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 277. IMPORTATION OF LOW-LEVEL RADIO9 ACTIVE WASTE. 

10 ‘‘a. Except as provided in subsection b. or c., the 

11 Commission shall not issue a license authorizing the im12 portation into the United States of— 

13 ‘‘(1) low-level radioactive waste (as defined in 

14 section 2 of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy 

15 Act (42 U.S.C. 2021b)); or 

16 ‘‘(2) specific radioactive waste streams exempt17 ed from regulation by the Commission under section 

18 10 of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act 

19 (42 U.S.C. 2021j). 

20 ‘‘b. Subsection a. shall not apply to— 

21 ‘‘(1) low-level radioactive waste being returned 

22 to a United States Government or military facility 

23 which is authorized to possess the material; or 

24 ‘‘(2) low-level radioactive waste resulting from 

25 the use in a foreign country of nuclear material ob26 tained by the foreign user from an entity in the 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 515 RFS 

1 United States that is being returned to the United 

2 States for management and disposal. 

3 ‘‘c. The President may waive the prohibition under 

4 this section and authorize the grant of a specific license 

5 to import materials prohibited under subsection a., under 

6 the rules of the Commission, only after a finding that such 

7 importation would meet an important national or inter8 national policy goal, such as the use of waste for research 

9 purposes. Such a waiver must specify the policy goal to 

10 be achieved, how it is to be achieved, and the amount of 

11 material to be imported. 

12 ‘‘d. A license not permitted under this section that 

13 was issued before the date of enactment of this section 

14 may continue in effect according to its terms, but may 

15 not be extended or amended with respect to the amount 

16 of material permitted to be imported.’’. 

17 (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS AMENDMENT.—The table 

18 of contents for the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 is amended 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 515 RFS 

1 by inserting after the item relating to section 276 the fol2 lowing new item: 

‘‘Sec. 277. Importation of low-level radioactive waste.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 2, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-1930

___________________________

Sandra H. Harp

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Navarre Logistical Services, Inc.; David Ginsberg; Margot McManus; Micki St.

Clair, as agents for Navarre Logistical Services, Inc.

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________

 Submitted: January 29, 2014

Filed: February 7, 2014 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Sandra Harp appeals from the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in her pro se action claiming that her former employer terminated her based

on her race, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Upon careful de

novo review, see Olsen v. Capital Region Med. Ctr., 713 F.3d 1149, 1153 (8th Cir.

2013), we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment because

the admissible evidence before the court would not permit a factfinder to conclude that

defendants’ proffered reason for firing Harp was pretextual. See Twymon v. Wells

Fargo & Co., 462 F.3d 925, 935 (8th Cir. 2006) (plaintiff failed to show proffered

reason for termination was pretext where she did not assert that employer did not

honestly believe she was accountable for violations of policy when it fired her for

those violations). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1

The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Franklin L.

Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-
# L_2007330EN.01006002.xml

| 15.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 330/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 330/60

---

Corrigendum to Political and Security Committee Decision EUPM/3/2007 of 30 November 2007 concerning the appointment of the Head of Mission/Police Commissioner of the European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 329 of 14 December 2007
  )

In the Contents page and on page 63, in the title:

for:

‘Political and Security Committee Decision EUPM/3/2007 of 30 November 2007 concerning the appointment of the Head of Mission/Police Commissioner of the European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH)’,

read:

‘Political and Security Committee Decision EUPM/1/2007 of 30 November 2007 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission/Police Commissioner of the European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH)’.

---
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15                (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Curtis              L.              Garner, Jr.       |   |   |   |
| Curtis              L. Garner, Jr.                                  |   |   |        |
| Chief                Financial OfficerAugust                9, 2006 |   |   |   |

----
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-1385-14

KENNETH GERHART ANDREW, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ORDER PURSUANT TO TEXAS RULES OF 

APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 9.10

Per curiam.

ORDER

This cause is before this Court on petition for discretionary review from Court of

Appeals case number 14-07-00241-CR, trial court case number 1058171 in the 177

th

District Court of Harris County.

The Clerk of this Court has discovered sensitive data in the record, namely: the

name of the complainant who was a minor TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art 57.02(h). TEX. R. APP.

P. Rule 9.10(a). Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.10, the Clerk sought a

ruling from the Court and thereafter notified the parties. The Court now orders the Clerk
Rule 9.10 Order - 2

of this Court to redact or seal the discovered sensitive data from the records identified and

listed below. The Court further orders the trial court clerk, the clerk of the court of

appeals, or any entity or individual possessing the following documents to redact or seal

the documents pursuant to this order:

1. Clerk’s Record

2. Reporter’s Record

3. Appellant’s Brief (filed in the court of appeals)

4. Petition for Discretionary Review

Filed: May 27, 2015

Do not publish
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 210 (Tuesday, November 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 65979]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21742]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

October 24, 2005.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
11000, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before December 1, 
2005 to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1414.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Credit for Employer Social Security and Medicare Taxes Paid 
on Certain Employee Tips.
    Form: IRS form 8846.
    Description: Employers in food or beverage establishments where 
tipping is customary can claim an income tax credit for the amount of 
social security and Medicare taxes paid (employer's share) on tips, 
other than tips used to meet the minimum wage requirements.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 492,465 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Glenn P. Kirkland, (202) 622-3428. Internal 
Revenue Service, Room 6516, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7316. Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Michael A. Robinson,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-21742 Filed 10-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
# C_2007126EN.01000201.xml

| 7.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4541 — Bridgepoint/Rodenstock)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 126/02)

On 6 March 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4541. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4541. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---