Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 211 / Wednesday, November 2, 2005 / Notices 66405 

comments by e-mail or U.S. postal mail. 

To submit your comments by e-mail 

send them to: PRA@fcc.gov. To submit 

your comments by U.S. mail, mark it to 

the attention of Leslie F. Smith, Federal 

Communications Commission, 445 12th 

Street, SW., Room 1–A804, Washington, 

DC 20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information about the 

information collection(s) send an e-mail 

to PRA@fcc.gov or contact Leslie F. 

Smith at 202–418–0217. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0398. 

Title: Equipment Authorization 

Measurement Standards, 47 CFR 

§§ 2.948 and 15.117(g)(2). 

Form Number: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities. 

Number of Respondents: 320. 

Estimated Time per Response: 5 to 30 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: 

Recordkeeping; One-time, three year, 

and on occasion reporting requirement; 

Third party disclosure. 

Total Annual Burden: 9,100 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: None. 

Privacy Impact Assessment: No 

impact(s). 

Needs and Uses: The Commission 

uses this information to ensure that data 

accompanying all requests for 

equipment authorization are valid, and 

that proper testing procedures are used. 

Testing ensures that potential 

interference to radio communications is 

controlled, and if necessary, the data 

may be used for investigating 

complaints or harmful interference, or 

for verifying the manufacturer’s 

compliance with FCC rules. The 

Commission eliminated the necessity 

for manufacturers to file UHF noise 

figure data documenting the 

performance of TV receivers tested and 

marketed in the U.S. in ET Docket 95–

144. 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0436. 

Title: Equipment Authorization—

Cordless Telephone Security Coding. 

Form Number: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities. 

Number of Respondents: 100. 

Estimated Time per Response: 1.5 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: 

Recordkeeping; One time and on 

occasion reporting requirements; Third 

party disclosure. 

Total Annual Burden: 150 hours. 

Total Estimated Cost: None. 

Privacy Impact Assessment: No 

impact(s). 

Needs and Uses: The Commission 

requires that cordless telephone security 

features protect the public switched 

telephone network from unintentional 

line seizure and telephone dialing. 

These features prevent unauthorized 

access to the telephone line, the dialing 

of calls in response to signals other than 

those from the owner’s handset and the 

unintentional ringing of a cordless 

telephone handset. Use of the cordless 

telephone security features reduces the 

harm caused by some cordless 

telephones to the ‘‘911’’ Emergency 

Service Telephone System and the 

telephone network in general. 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0387. 

Title: Section 15.201(d), On Site 

Verification of Field Disturbance 

Sensors. 

Form Number: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities. 

Number of Respondents: 200. 

Estimated Time per Response: 18 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: 

Recordkeeping; One and on occasion 

reporting requirements; Third party 

disclosure. 

Total Annual Burden: 3,600 hours. 

Total Estimated Cost: $40,000. 

Privacy Impact Assessment: No 

impact(s). 

Needs and Uses: Commission rules 

permit the operation of field disturbance 

sensors in the low VHF region of the 

spectrum. In order to monitor nonlicensed field disturbance sensors 

operating in the low VHF television 

bands, a unique procedure for on-site 

equipment testing of the systems is 

required to ensure suitable safeguards 

for the operation of these devices. Data 

are retained by the holder of the 

equipment authorized/issued by the 

Commission and made available only at 

the request of the Commission. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05–21470 Filed 11–1–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information 

Collection(s) Being Submitted for 

Review to the Office of Management 

and Budget 

October 25, 2005. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995, Public Law 104–13. 

An agency may not conduct or sponsor 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a valid control number. 

Comments are requested concerning (a) 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; and (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) comments should be 

submitted on or before December 2, 

2005. If you anticipate that you will be 

submitting PRA comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contact listed below as soon 

as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all Paperwork 

Reduction Act (PRA) comments to 

Judith B. Herman, Federal 

Communications Commission, Room 1–

C804, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, 

DC 20554 or via the Internet to JudithB.Herman@fcc.gov. If you would like to 

obtain or view a copy of this new or 

revised information collection, you may 

do so by visiting the FCC PRA Web page 

at: http://www.fcc.gov/omd/pra. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information or copies of the 

information collection(s), contact Judith 

B. Herman at 202–418–0214 or via the 

Internet at Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control No.: 3060–0813. 

66406 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 211 / Wednesday, November 2, 2005 / Notices 

Title: Commission’s Rules to Ensure 

Compatibility with Enhanced 911 

Emergency Calling Systems. 

Form No.: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit. 

Number of Respondents: 47,031. 

Estimated Time Per Response: 1–5 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement. 

Total Annual Burden: 198,200 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: N/A. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A. 

Needs and Uses: The Commission 

seeks three-year approval for an 

extension (no change in requirements) 

for this information collection. 

The Commission responded to a 

petition for clarification and/or 

declaratory ruling filed by the City of 

Richardson, TX, by amending the 

Commission’s rules to clarify what 

constitutes a valid Public Safety 

Answering Point (PSAP) triggering a 

wireless carrier’s obligation to provide 

E911 service to that PSAP. 

Specifically, the Order in CC Docket 

94–102, FCC 01–293, found that a 

wireless carrier must implement E911 

service within the six-month period 

following the date of the PSAP’s 

request, and that if challenged by the 

wireless carrier, the request be deemed 

valid if the PSAP making the request 

demonstrates that: (1) A mechanism is 

in place by which the PSAP will recover 

its costs of the facilities and equipment 

necessary to receive and utilize the E911 

data elements; (2) the PSAP has ordered 

the equipment necessary to receive and 

utilize the E911 data and the equipment 

will be installed and capable of 

receiving and utilizing that data no later 

than six months following its request; 

and (3) the PSAP has made a timely 

request to the appropriate local 

exchange carrier (LEC) for the necessary 

trunking and other facilities to enable 

the E911 data to be transmitted to the 

PSAP. In the alternative, the PSAP may 

demonstrate that a funding mechanism 

is in place, that is E911-capable using a 

Non-Call Associated Signaling (NCAS) 

technology, and that it has made a 

timely request to the appropriate LEC 

for the necessary Automatic Location 

Identification (ALI) database upgrade. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05–21858 Filed 11–1–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information 

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the 

Federal Communications Commission, 

Comments Requested 

October 25, 2005. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995, Public Law 104–13. 

An agency may not conduct or sponsor 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act that does not 

display a valid control number. 

Comments are requested concerning (a) 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; and (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) comments should be 

submitted on or before January 3, 2006. 

If you anticipate that you will be 

submitting comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contact listed below as soon 

as possible. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit your 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) 

comments by e-mail or U.S. postal mail. 

To submit you comments by e-mail send 

them to: PRA@fcc.gov. To submit your 

comments by U.S. mail, mark it to the 

attention of Judith B. Herman, Federal 

Communications Commission, 445 12th 

Street, SW., Room 1–C804, Washington, 

DC 20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information about the 

information collection(s) send an e-mail 

to PRA@fcc.gov or contact Judith B. 

Herman at 202–418–0214. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB 

Control No.: 3060–0678. 

Title: Part 25 of the Commission’s 

Rules Governing the Licensing of, and 

Spectrum Usage by, Satellite Network 

Stations and Space Stations. 

Form No.: FCC Form 312, Schedule S. 

Type of Review: Revision of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit. 

Number of Respondents: 3,432. 

Estimated Time Per Response: 1–80 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

and annual reporting requirements, and 

third party disclosure requirement. 

Total Annual Burden: 42,108 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: $531,875,000. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A. 

Needs and Uses: On March 15, 2005, 

the Federal Communications 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) released a 

Third Further Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking (FCC 05–62) in which it 

proposed to combine power level 

requirements and antenna diameter 

requirements into one off-axis 

equivalent isotropically radiated power 

(EIRP) requirement. (Equivalent 

Isotropically Radiated Power (EIRP) is 

the product of the gain of the antenna 

in a given direction relative to an 

isotropic antenna and the power 

supplied to that antenna, see 47 CFR 

Section 2.1). If this proposal is adopted, 

it would give earth station operators 

more flexibility in their operations and 

help expedite its review of some nonroutine earth station applications. The 

Commission invited comment on what 

revisions would be necessary to its rules 

to provide protection from interference 

for earth stations in the event that it 

adopts an off-axis EIRP requirement for 

fixed satellite service (FSS) earth 

stations. Additionally, the Commission 

invited comment on what specific 

information should be required from 

earth station applicants in order to 

comply with the proposed off-axis EIRP 

requirement. 

The following information collections 

are proposed in the rulemaking: (1) 

Earth station applicants will provide a 

table showing the EIRP of the antenna 

at various specific off-axis angles, (2) 

Very Small Aperture Terminal (VSAT) 

licensees will certify that they will meet 

any applicable requirements for 

contention protocols adopted in this 

proceeding; (3) any party questioning a 

license applicant’s contention protocol 

certification will provide a technical 

analysis showing that the applicant’s 

planned contention protocol usage is 

likely to cause harmful interference to 

adjacent satellites or terrestrial wireless 

operations and (4) a certificate of 

coordination signed by an authorized 

representative of the National Radio