alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10. (iii)(21)

                                  AGREEMENT
                                   between
                SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. and ARTHUR C. MARTINEZ


         Sears, Roebuck and Co., a New York corporation (the "Company"), and
Arthur C. Martinez (the "Executive") entered into an Employment Agreement
("Agreement") dated August 10, 1992.  The Company and the Executive entered
into an extension and amendment of the Agreement, dated August 9, 1995, which
is referred to as the "Continuation Agreement."  The terms of the Agreement,
which would have expired on August 31, 1995, were extended until December 1,
1995, unless sooner terminated by mutual agreement, by the terms of the
Continuation Agreement.

         
         The Company and the Executive agree as follows:

1.       Article III, subparagraphs 3.07(b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) of the
Agreement, and numbered paragraph 3 of the Continuation Agreement are hereby
eliminated, retroactive to August 10, 1992.  Any other references to the
eliminated provisions in the Agreement are appropriately changed to reflect
this amendment.

2.       In addition to the Executive's pension benefits payable at
retirement, the Company will pay the Executive an additional amount from the
Supplemental Retirement Income Plan ("SRIP"), which additional amount will be
determined by adding ten years to the Executive's then actual continuous and
credited service.  In computing this additional pension benefit, the Company
will apply the rules of the Sears Pension Plan and SRIP then in effect.  This
additional amount is fully vested on the date this agreement is dated below.


Dated:   November 13, 1995

SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.

By:   /S/David Shute                      /S/Arthur C. Martinez    
                                           ARTHUR C. MARTINEZ  
Its:  Senior Vice President,    
      Law and Corporate Secretary
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 4(c)


                        LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS OF RECORD
                                 APRIL 26, 2002



               ~ UROPLASTY, INC. SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS OFFERING ~


   SHARES OF UROPLASTY, INC. COMMON STOCK & WARRANTS OFFERED PURSUANT TO
           RIGHTS DISTRIBUTED TO SHAREHOLDERS OF UROPLASTY, INC.




Dear Shareholder,

This letter is being distributed to all holders of Common Stock of record as of
April 26, 2002 in connection with a distribution of Subscription Rights to
acquire shares of the Company's Common Stock along with a Warrant to purchase
additional shares of Common Stock at a future date.

The terms of the Rights Offering are described in the Company's Prospectus dated
April 26, 2002. Please review the entire Prospectus carefully. The specific
terms of the Rights Offering are described on the cover page of the Prospectus,
which is enclosed. Rights are not transferable, may not be sold, and will
terminate upon sale or transfer of the shares of common stock to which they
relate. The Company declared a 1-for-3 reverse stock split effective as of the
April 2, 2002.


ENCLOSED DOCUMENTS:

      -     The Prospectus

      -     The Rights Subscription Certificate

      -     A return envelope addressed to Uroplasty, Inc., 2718 Summer Street
            NE, Minneapolis, MN 55413-2820


EXPIRATION DATE:

Your prompt action is requested, as the Rights Offering will expire at 5:00
P.M., Minnesota Time on June 25, 2002, unless extended by the Company.


TO EXERCISE THE SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS:

To exercise the Rights, a properly completed and executed Rights Subscription
Certificate and payment in full of the Subscription Price for all of the Rights
exercised must be delivered to Uroplasty, Inc., 2718 Summer Street NE,
Minneapolis, MN 55413-2820, as indicated in the Prospectus prior to the
Expiration Date of 5:00 P.M., June 25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota Time.


 SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS EXPIRATION DATE: MAY __, 2002
<PAGE>
OVERSUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS:

Only Shareholders who exercise all of their Rights can participate in an
Oversubscription Privilege for the over-allotment of Basic Subscription Rights,
subject to availability. This Oversubscription Privilege must be exercised at
the same time as the Basic Subscription Rights on the Rights Subscription
Certificate. Oversubscription Rights can be exercised for any number of Shares
and Warrants to the extent available. If enough Shares and Warrants are not
available to meet Oversubscription requests, they will be allocated pro rata and
excess funds will be returned to Shareholders accordingly.


If you need more information on this Rights Offering, or require additional
copies of the enclosed materials, please call me directly at (612) 378-1180,
extension 206, for my immediate attention.

Sincerely,

UROPLASTY, INC.



Daniel G. Holman
President and CEO



















ENCLOSURES:
Uroplasty, Inc. Subscription Rights Prospectus
Subscription Rights Certificate
Subscription Rights Certificate return envelope addressed to Uroplasty, Inc.


 SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS EXPIRATION DATE: MAY __, 2002
#### UNITED STATES of America, v. Tyler SMITH, Appellant.

No. 03-4679.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) Sept. 17, 2004.

Decided March 29, 2005.

Theodore B. Smith, III, Office of United States Attorney Federal Building, Harrisburg, PA, for United States of America.

Lori J. Ulrich, Office of Federal Public Defender, Harrisburg, PA, for Tyler Smith.

Before ALITO, AMBRO and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

FISHER, Circuit Judge.

In his brief, appellant waives any challenge to his conviction, instead asking that we remand for clarification as to whether the District Court’s denial of a downward departure was based on an exercise of discretion. However, the record, including the prosecutor’s concessions that departure would be lawful, make it clear that the District Court understood its authority and simply exercised its discretion not to depart when stating that a departure was “not warranted.” We therefore lack appellate jurisdiction over this portion of the appeal. *See United States v. Denardi,*892 F.2d 269 (3d Cir.1989).

We note that appellant also filed a post-briefing motion regarding other sentencing issues arising from *Blakely v. Washington,*— U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). Having determined that these other sentencing issues are best determined by the District Court in the first instance, we will vacate the sentence and remand for re-sentencing in accordance with *United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5146 

AN ACT 

To provide that Members of Congress shall not receive a 

cost of living adjustment in pay during fiscal year 2011. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5146 EH

1 SECTION 1. NO COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT IN PAY OF 

2 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. 

3 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no ad4 justment shall be made under section 601(a) of the Legis5 lative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31) (relating 

6 to cost of living adjustments for Members of Congress) 

7 during fiscal year 2011. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 27, 2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5146 

AN ACT 

To provide that Members of Congress shall not refiscal year 2011. ceive a cost of living adjustment in pay during
Opinion issued May 9, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-13-00125-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.C., AKA D.R.C., III, a Child

On Appeal from the 315th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-04925J

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed February 7, 2013. On April 5, 

2013, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal because the trial court 

set aside the February 7, 2013 judgment by order signed and entered March 6, 

2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1. No opinion has issued. Accordingly, we grant the 
2

motion and dismiss the appeal. See id. We dismiss all other pending motions as 

moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Sharp, and Huddle.
Exhibit 32.2
                                  ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of BSD Medical Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB Form for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis
Bradley, Controller (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.



/s/ Dennis Bradley
------------------
Dennis Bradley
Controller (Principal Financial Officer)
December 1, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STANBACK v. COBLE, SEC. OF REVENUE

No. 62 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 533.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 November 1976.
#### BERNICE T. HAGINS v. SOUTH ATLANTIC BONDED WAREHOUSE CORPORATION, ALLIED VAN LINES, INC., and REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF GREENSBORO

No. 685

(Filed 31 January 1969)

Appeal by plaintiff from the decision of the Court of Appeals (reported in 1 N.C. App. 56, 159 S.E. 2d 596) affirming the judgment of *Crissman, J.,*entered at the 2 October 1967 Civil Session of Guilford, Greensboro Division.

*Comer & Harrelson ■¡or plaintiff appellant.*

*D. Newton Farnell, Jr., Jordan, Wright, Nichols, Caffrey & Hill for South Atlantic Bonded Warehouse Corporation and Allied Van Lines, Inc., defendant appellees.*

*Cannon, Wolfe, Coggin*<fe *Taylor for Redevelopment Commission of Greensboro, defendant appellee.*

PER CüRiam.

This is a companion case to *Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission,*decided this day and reported *ante*90. It is referred to in sufficient detail in the statement of facts in that case to disclose that decision there controls decision here. See also the statement of facts preceding the final five paragraphs in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. 1 N.C. App. 56, 61, 159 S.E. 2d 596, 600.

*108For the reasons stated in *Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission,*the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and this cause is remanded to that Court with the direction that it vacate the judgment of the Superior Court from which plaintiff appealed and remand the case to that court for such further proceedings, consistent with the legal principles herein enunciated, as may be initiated.

Error and remanded.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5437 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5437

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 
 treatment of tenant-stockholders in cooperative housing corporations 
also shall apply to stockholders of corporations that only own the land 
                  on which the residences are located.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 27, 2010

 Mr. Crowley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 
 treatment of tenant-stockholders in cooperative housing corporations 
also shall apply to stockholders of corporations that only own the land 
                  on which the residences are located.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF RULES APPLICABLE TO TENANT-STOCKHOLDERS OF 
              COOPERATIVE HOUSING CORPORATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 216 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(7) Cooperative housing corporations owning or leasing 
        only land.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The term `cooperative housing 
                corporation' includes any corporation which would be a 
                cooperative housing corporation if `or situated on land 
                owned or leased by the corporation' were inserted 
                before the comma at the end of paragraph (1)(B).
                    ``(B) Determination of whether stock is fully paid-
                up.--In the case of a corporation which would not be a 
                cooperative housing corporation but for subparagraph 
                (A), the determination under paragraph (2) of whether 
                the stock of any stockholder who owns a house situated 
                on land owned or leased by the corporation is fully 
                paid-up shall be based on the portion of the value of 
                the corporation's equity in the land on which the 
                houses are situated which is attributable to the land 
                on which such stockholder's house is situated.
                    ``(C) Trailer parks excluded.--This paragraph shall 
                not apply if any house situated on land owned or leased 
                by the corporation is a mobile home.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15a-14(b) and Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Permian Basin Royalty Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K
for the annual period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as
the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEEFORPERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTDate: March 16, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Ron E. HooperRon E. Hooper,   Senior
Vice President,Royalty Management
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Permian Basin Royalty Trust and will be retained by the Permian Basin Royalty Trust and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<SEQUENCE>13

                                  EXHIBIT 32.a


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regent Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David A. Nelson, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        /S/ DAVID A. NELSON
                                        -------------------
Date: March 29, 2006
                                        David A. Nelson,
                                        Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                        Accounting Officer
Exhibit 21

List of Subsidiaries

Active subsidiaries of the Company as of
December 31, 2010:



|                                                        |  |                               
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                                      |  | State/Country of Incorporation
|Ubiquity.com, Inc.                                      |  | Delaware                      
|Xacta Corporation                                       |  | Delaware                      
|Telos Delaware, Inc.                                    |  | Delaware                      
|Teloworks, Inc.                                         |  | Delaware                      
|Telos Identity Management Solutions, LLC (DBA Telos ID) |  | Delaware                      
|Teloworks Philippines, Inc.                             |  | Philippines                   
|Teloworks BPO Solutions Philippines, Inc.               |  | Philippines
# L_2007141EN.01008301.xml

| 2.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 141/83 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 141/83

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2007/252/JHA of 19 April 2007 establishing for the period 2007-2013 the specific programme ‘Fundamental rights and citizenship’ as part of the general programme ‘Fundamental Rights and Justice’

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 110 of 27 April 2007
  )

In the Contents on page 2 of the cover, and on page 33, the following lines are deleted:

| | ‘III Acts adopted under the EU Treaty

  ACTS ADOPTED UNDER TITLE VI OF THE EU TREATY’, |
| --- | --- |

‘III Acts adopted under the EU Treaty

Acts adopted under the EU Treaty

ACTS ADOPTED UNDER TITLE VI OF THE EU TREATY’,

| | and the number of the Decision:







  for | : | ‘2007/252/JHA’, |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| read | : | ‘2007/252/EC’. |

and the number of the Decision:

for

:

‘2007/252/JHA’,

read

:

‘2007/252/EC’.

---
# L_2007032EN.01006401.xml

| 6.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 32/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 32/64

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 28 August 2006

concerning the conclusion of an Agreement between the Government of Japan and the European Atomic Energy Community for co-operation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy

(2007/58/EURATOM)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 101 thereof,

Having regard to the Council Decision of 27 February 2006, approving the conclusion by the Commission of an Agreement between the Government of Japan and the European Atomic Energy Community for co-operation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy,

Whereas the Agreement between the Government of Japan and the European Atomic Energy Community for co-operation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement between the Government of Japan and the European Atomic Energy Community for co-operation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy is hereby approved on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community.

Text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The Commissioner for Energy shall, with regard to the Community, give the notification provided for in Article 17(1) of the Agreement.

Done at Brussels, 28 August 2006

For the Commission

Andris PIEBALGS

Member of the Commission

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 209 (Monday, October 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 62323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21605]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[MT-079-06-1010-PH]


Notice of Public Meeting, Western Montana Resource Advisory 
Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the 
Western Montana Resource Advisory Council will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The next regular meeting of the Western Montana RAC will be held 
November 30, 2005 at the Butte Field Office, 106 N. Parkmont, Butte, 
Montana beginning at 9 a.m. The public comment period will begin at 
11:30 a.m. and the meeting is expected to adjourn at approximately 3 
p.m. This meeting replaces the meeting originally scheduled for October 
13, 2005, but was cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For the Western Montana RAC, contact 
Marilyn Krause, Resource Advisory Council Coordinator, at the Butte 
Field Office, 106 North Parkmont, Butte, Montana 59701, telephone 406-
533-7617.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15-member Council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of 
planning and management issues associated with public land management 
in western Montana. At the November 30 meeting, topics we plan to 
discuss include: the Butte Resource Management Plan travel management 
and a presentation on Montana economics and how it relates to public 
land management. We will also have a briefing on the recent White House 
Conservation Conference.
    All meetings are open to the public. The public may present written 
comments to the Council. Each formal Council meeting will also have 
time allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of 
persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual 
oral comments may be limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need 
special assistance, such as sign language interpretation, or other 
reasonable accommodations, should contact the BLM as provided below.

    Dated: October 25, 2005.
John W. Thompson,
Acting Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 05-21605 Filed 10-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

SERGIO RENE MONTEJANO,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-12-00235-CR

Appeal from the

168th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20090D05687)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant=s third motion for extension of time to file the brief 

until April 16, 2013. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

THE APPELLANT=S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. John L. Williams, Appellant’s Attorney, prepare the 

Appellant=s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before April 16, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 3

rd day of April, 2013.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.