United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

A.S., Appellant

and

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL 

BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL 

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, TERMINAL 

ISLAND, San Pedro, CA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0947

Issued: November 22, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

JURISDICTION

On June 29, 2023 appellant filed a timely appeal from an April 19, 2023 nonmerit decision 

of the Office of Workers’Compensation Programs (OWCP). As more than 180 days elapsed from 

the last merit decision on this issue, dated October 17, 2022, to the filing of this appeal, pursuant 

to the Federal Employees’Compensation Act1(FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the 

Board lacks jurisdiction to review the merits of this case.2

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.

2 The Board notes that appellantsubmittedadditional evidence to the Board on appeal. However, the Board’s Rules 

of Procedure provide: The Board’s review of a case is limited to the evidence in the case record that was before 

OWCP at the time of its final decision. Evidence not before OWCP will not be considered by the Board for the first 

time on appeal. 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c)(1). Thus, the Board is precluded from reviewing this additional evidence for the 

first time on appeal. Id.
2

ISSUE

The issue is whether OWCP properly determined that appellant abandoned his request for 

an oral hearing before a representative of OWCP’s Branch of Hearings and Review. 

FACTUAL HISTORY

On June 30, 1999 appellant, then a 39-year-old physician assistant, filed a traumatic injury 

claim (Form CA-1) alleging that on June 28, 1999 he sustained right wrist sprain when opening a 

door while in the performance of duty. OWCP accepted the claim, under OWCP File No. 

xxxxxx694,for right wrist strain, closed dislocation of the wrist, open fracture of the lunate bone 

of the wrist, right carpal tunnel syndrome, and a lesion of the right ulnar nerve. 3 

On September 2, 2022 OWCP proposed termination of appellant’s wage-loss 

compensation, as the weight of the medical evidence established that he no longer had continuing 

disability from work causally related to his accepted conditions. 

By decision dated October 17, 2022, OWCP finalized its proposed termination of 

appellant’s wage-loss compensation. 

On November 9, 2022 appellant requested an oral hearing before a representative of 

OWCP’s Branch of Hearings and Review regarding the October 17, 2022 termination decision. 

He submitted additional medical evidence in support of his claim. 

In a March 6, 2023 notice, OWCP’s hearing representative informed appellant that his oral 

hearing would be conducted by telephone, and was scheduled for April 6, 2023 at noon Eastern 

Standard Time (EST). The hearing representative provided a toll-free number and passcode for 

access to the hearing and mailed the notice to appellant’s last known address of record. Appellant 

did not appear for the telephonic hearing at the appointed time, and no request for postponement 

was made.

By decision dated April 19, 2023, OWCP found that appellant had abandoned his request 

for an oral hearing as he had received written notification of the hearing 30 days in advance, but

failed to appear. It further noted that there was no indication in the record that he had contacted 

the Branch of Hearings and Review either prior to or subsequent to the scheduled hearing to 

explain his failure to appear. 

LEGAL PRECEDENT

Under FECA and its implementing regulations, a claimant who has received a final adverse 

decision by OWCP is entitled to receive a hearing by writing to the address specified in the decision 

within 30 days of the date of the decision for which a hearing is sought.4 Unless otherwise directed 

3 On December 18, 2002 under OWCP File No. xxxxxx939, OWCP accepted temporary aggravation of right wrist 

strain related to a slip and fall while in the performance of duty on June 28, 2002. It has administratively combined 

the two OWCP files with OWCP File No. xxxxxx694 serving as the master file. 

4

20 C.F.R. § 10.616(a).
3

in writing by the claimant, OWCP’s hearing representative will mail a notice of the time and place 

of the hearing to the claimant and any representative at least 30 days before the scheduled date. 5 

OWCP has the burden of proving that it properly mailed notice of the scheduled hearing to a 

claimant and any representative of record.6

A claimant who fails to appear at a scheduled hearing may request in writing, within 10 

days after the date set for the hearing, that another hearing be scheduled. Where good cause for 

failure to appear is shown, another hearing will be scheduled and conducted by teleconference. 7 

The failure of the claimant to request another hearing within 10 days, or the failure of the claimant 

to appear at the second scheduled hearing without good cause shown, shall constitute abandonment 

of the request for a hearing.8

ANALYSIS

The Board finds that OWCP properly determined that appellant abandoned his request for 

an oral hearing before a representative of OWCP’s Branch of Hearings and Review.

Following OWCP’s October 17, 2022 decision terminating appellant’s wage-loss 

compensation, he filed a timely request for an oral hearing before a representative of OWCP’s 

Branch of Hearings and Review. In a March 6, 2023 notice, OWCP’s hearing representative 

informed appellant that his oral hearing would be conducted by telephone and was scheduled for 

April 6, 2023 at noon EST. The hearing representative mailed the notice to appellant’s last known 

address of record and provided instructions on how to participate. The Board has held that, absent 

evidence to the contrary, a letter properly addressed and mailed in the ordinary course of business 

is presumed to have been received. This is called the mailbox rule. 9

Appellant failed to call in for the scheduled hearing at the prescribed time. He did not 

request a postponement or provide an explanation to OWCP for failure to appear for the hearing 

within 10 days of the scheduled hearing. As appellant failed to call in for the scheduled hearing 

or provide notification to OWCP’s Branch of Hearings and Review within 10 days of the scheduled 

hearing explaining failure to appear, the Board finds that OWCP properly determined that he 

abandoned his request for an oral hearing.10

5

Id. at § 10.617(b).

6 L.L., Docket No. 21-1194 (issued March 18, 2022); L.T., Docket No. 20-1539 (issued August2, 2021); V.C., 

Docket No. 20-0798 (issued November 16, 2020); M.R., Docket No. 18-1643 (issued March1, 2019); T.P., Docket 

No. 15-0806 (issued September 11, 2015); Michelle R. Littlejohn, 42 ECAB 463 (1991).

7

20 C.F.R. § 10.622(f).

8 Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 2 -- Claims, Hearings and Reviews of the Written Record, Chapter 

2.1601.6g (September 2020); see also L.L. and V.C., supra note 6; K.H., Docket No. 20-1198 (issued February 8, 

2021); A.J., Docket No. 18-0830 (issued January 10, 2019).

9

See L.L., V.C., and L.T., supra note 6.

10 Id.
4

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that OWCP properly determined that appellant abandoned his request for 

an oral hearing before a representative of OWCP’s Branch of Hearings and Review. 

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the April 19, 2023 decision of the Office of Workers’

Compensation Programs is affirmed.

Issued: November 22, 2023

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board