alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                                WASHINGTON, D.C.

                                   FORM 10-Q
                                QUARTERLY REPORT

       Under Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                             FOR THREE MONTHS ENDED

                                 March 31, 1998

                            Commission File:  0-3216

                   INVESTORS HERITAGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in Charter)

                                    KENTUCKY
         (State of Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

                                   61-0574893
                      (IRS Employer Identification Number

                       200 Capital Avenue, P. O. Box 717
                           Frankfort, Kentucky  40602
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)

                 Registrant's Telephone Number - (502) 223-2361

          Securities registered pursuant to Section 13(g) of the Act:

                 Common Capital Stock par value $1.00 per share
                                (Title of Class)

           Number of outstanding shares as of March 31, 1998- 904,928

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days Yes X    No ____



                          PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  Legal Proceedings.

There are no legal proceedings to which the Registrant is a party  which are
material to the overall financial condition or the results of operations of
the Company.

ITEM 2.  Changes in Securities.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 4.  Submission of matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None.

ITEM  5.  Other Information.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 6.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

(b)  There were no reports filed on Form 8-K during the quarter ended March
31, 1998.

(c)  Exhibit 27 - Financial Data Schedule.


                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

INVESTORS HERITAGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
/s/
BY:  HARRY LEE WATERFIELD II
PRESIDENT
DATE:  May 8, 1998

/s/
BY:  JIMMY R. MCIVER
TREASURER
DATE:  May 8, 1998
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-3062 DAN C. BOECHLER,

Petitioner,

v. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,

Respondent. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in consolidated cases DE0752040295-I-4 and DE0752040458-1-4. ON MOTION Before MOORE Circuit Judge. ORDER Upon consideration of Dan C. Boechler's unopposed motion for a 45-day extension of time, until May 14, 2009, to file his principal brief, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT 

### APR 

## 1 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Jan Horbaly Clerk FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT APR 0 1 2009
CLERK Date

cc: David C. Thompson, Esq. Scott D. Austin, Esq. s8
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

E.T., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, NAVAL SEA 

SYSTEMS COMMAND, SUPSHIP GULF 

COAST, Pascagoula, MS, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 22-0619

Issued: September 19, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

On March 20, 2022 appellant sought an appeal from a purported March 8, 2022 decision 

of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 22-0619.

The Board, having duly considered the matter, notes that its jurisdiction is limited to the 

review of final adverse OWCPdecisions issued under the Federal Employees’Compensation Act.1 

The Board notes that the case record does not contain a final adverse decision of OWCP dated 

March 8, 2022. The last decision of record was a September 28, 2009 merit decision in which 

OWCP accepted appellant’s claim for hearing loss. As the case record as transmitted to the Board 

does not contain a final adverse decision of OWCP issued within 180 days from the date of 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).
2

docketing of the current appeal over which the Board may properly exercise jurisdiction,2the 

Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 22-0619 must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 22-0619 is dismissed.

Issued: September 19, 2022

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

2

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the 

date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.”

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id. at

§ 501.6(d).
#### HACKETT v. HACKETT

No. 4 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 217.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 21 December 1976.
# C_2007270EN.01000901.xml

| 13.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4843 — RBS/ABN AMRO assets)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 270/04)

On 19 September 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4843. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4843. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7219

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus JONATHAN WAYNE HADRICK, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CR92-402) Submitted: December 15, 2005 De cided: December 21, 2005 Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jonathan Wayne Hadrick, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jonathan Wayne Hadrick appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2005). In criminal cases, a defendant must file his notice of appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); United States v. Alvarez , 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000) (holding that § 3582 proceeding is criminal in nature and ten-day appeal period applies and collecting cases adopting rule). With or without a motion, the district court may grant an extension of time to file of up to thirty da ys upon a showing of excusable negle ct or good cause. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). These time periods are mandatory and jurisdictional. United States v. Raynor , 939 F.2d 191, 196 (4th Cir. 1991). The district court entered its order denying the § 3582(c)(2) motion on June 6, 2005. The ten-day appeal period expired on June 20, 2005. SeeFed. R. App. P. 26(a)(2). Hadrick filed his notice of appeal, at the earliest, on June 28, 2005—outside the ten-day appeal period but within the thirty-day excusable neglect period. Although Hadrick filed a motion to extend the appeal period under Rule 4(b)(4) based upon excusable neglect, the district court denied the motion. Hadrick does not challenge the court’s denial of that motion in his informal- 3 - appellate brief. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(b) (“The Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief.”). Because the district court declined to extend the appeal period, Hadrick’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
# C_2007263EN.01000101.xml

| 6.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4760 — Amadeus/Sabre/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 263/01)

On 12 September 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4760. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4760. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
bigc-ex1016_6.htm



 

Exhibit 10.16

2022 Executive Bonus Plan


	
1.
	
Purpose. The purpose of the 2022 Executive Bonus Plan (this “Plan”) is to encourage, recognize, and annually reward the achievement of key financial objectives for BigCommerce Holdings, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”).





	
2.
	
Period. This Plan period covers the Company’s fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2022 and ending on December 31, 2022. Plan participation, performance goals, and target incentives are established at the beginning of the year.





	
3.
	
Eligibility. Each participant must be in a position to materially contribute to the success of the Company. Participation is limited to Company executives with titles of vice president or higher. A participant does not earn a Participant Bonus Payment and a participant is not eligible to receive a Participant Bonus Payment unless the participant is employed by the Company on the date that Participant Bonus Payment is paid.





	
4.
	
Calculation. Bonuses and applicable bonus metrics will be determined from time to time by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”). Bonuses may be calculated from individual or company performance criteria including, without limitation, revenue, annual revenue run-rate, net revenue retention, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin, gross profit, non-GAAP operating income, or management-based objectives. Adjustments may be made at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee to include or exclude certain items in the calculations.





	
5.
	
Payments. Bonus payments to participants (each, a “Participant Bonus Payment”) are expected to be paid on or before March 15, 2023.





	
6.
	
Communications. No commitments, verbal or written, may be made to any participant regarding a Participant Bonus Payment unless approved in writing by the Company’s chief executive officer (the “CEO”).





	
7.
	
Promotions; New Hires. Recently promoted participants will have their Participant Bonus Payments prorated based on the first date of the participant’s eligibility for this Plan. Participant Bonus Payments for new hires will be calculated pro rata based on start date of the participant.





	
8.
	
Miscellaneous.





	
 
	
8.1.
	
General. The Compensation Committee will have sole authority and discretion to administer and interpret all aspects of this Plan.





	
 
	
8.2.
	
At-Will Employment. Participation in the Bonus Plan does not confer any right to continue to be employed by the Company.





	
 
	
8.3.
	
Modifications. The Company retains the absolute right to modify, alter or terminate this Plan at any time without notice.
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

D.K., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, VA

MEDICAL CENTER, Long Beach, CA,

Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0262

Issued: June 1, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On December 18, 2022 appellant filed a timely appeal from a December 15, 2022

decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the 

Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 23-0262.

In a letter received March 22, 2023, appellant requested that the appeal be dismissed.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that appellant’s request for the 

dismissal of the appeal should be granted. Accordingly, 
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the dismissal of the appeal 

is granted. The appeal docketed as No. 23-0262 is dismissed.

Issued: June 1, 2023

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
1 The Honorable Timothy J. Mahoney, Chief Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-2763

___________ In re: Mark Henry Foss, * * Debtor. * ------------------- * * Mark Henry Foss, * * Appeal from the United States Appellant, * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel * for the Eighth Circuit. v. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Hall County Child Support Office, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: June 23, 2006 Filed: June 26, 2006

___________ Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Mark Foss appeals from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (BAP) decision affirming the bankruptcy court’s 1 dismissal of his adversary proceeding with prejudice. We agree with the BAP that the bankruptcy court abstained from hearing-2- the issues raised by Foss in his pending state court proceedings. See 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b)-(c)(1) (generally, federal courts haveoriginal but not exclusive jurisdiction of all civil proceedings arising under title 11, or arising in or related to cases under title 11, but may abstain from hearing such pro ceeding in interest of comity with state courts or respect for state law). Accordi ngly, we do not have jurisdiction to review the bankruptcy court’s decision to abstain. See 28 U.S.C. § 1334(d) (decision to abstain under § 1334(c)(1) is not reviewable by courts of appeals). We therefore dismiss this appeal.

______________________________
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

KENNETH AND LISA AGOSTINELLI,

Petitioners

v.

HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS GREAT VALLEY EXTON; SAM BA L

,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 21 MM 2024

Application for Extraordinary Relief

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5 th day of March, 2024

, Petitioners’ Emergency Request for

Extraordinary Relief is DENIED

.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Grey Wolf, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Nos.
33-34590, 33-75338, 333-19027, 333-65049, 333-41334, and 333-90888 on Form S-8
of Grey Wolf, Inc. and Registration Statements Nos. 333-14783, 333-06077,
333-26519, 333-20423, 333-36593, 333-39683, 333-86949, 333-40874, and 333-106997
on Form S-3 of Grey Wolf, Inc. of our report dated January 30, 2004, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Grey Wolf, Inc. and Subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, and the
related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31,
2003 annual report on Form 10-K of Grey Wolf, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP


Houston, Texas
February 13, 2003
**Exhibit32.2**

 

 

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofInternational Aluminum Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), I, David C. Treinen, the President and Chief Operating Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

1.                           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 
| Date: May 11, 2005 | DAVID C. TREINEN        |
|--------------------|-------------------------|
|               | David C. Treinen        |
|               | President and           |
|               | Chief Operating Officer |

 

22

----
# C_2007234EN.01000401.xml

| 6.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4875 — Deutsche Bank/Abbey Life)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 234/02)

On 21 September 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4875. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4875. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
**Exhibit32.1**

 

 

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofInternational Aluminum Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), I, Cornelius C. Vanderstar, the Chairman of the Board and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tomy knowledge:

 

1.                           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 
| Date: May 11, 2005 | CORNELIUS C. VANDERSTAR    |
|--------------------|----------------------------|
|               | Cornelius C. Vanderstar    |
|               | Chairman of the Board  and |
|               | Chief Executive Officer    |

 

21

----
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                Denise L. Ramos                  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Denise                L. Ramos                      |
|   | Title:                Chief Financial Officer       |
|   | Furniture                Brands International, Inc. |
|   | November                9, 2006                     |