alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
 THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                             729
<SECURITIES>                                     3,144<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,793
<ALLOWANCES>                                       760
<INVENTORY>                                      5,069
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,667
<PP&E>                                          11,912
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,462
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,701
<BONDS>                                         12,884
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           323
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,516
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,954
<SALES>                                         36,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,071
<CGS>                                           27,212
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,307<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   871
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,419
<INCOME-TAX>                                       904
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,453
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,453
<EPS-BASIC>                                     3.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.81
<FN>
<F1>Represents retained interest in transferred credit card receivables
<F2>Represents the sum of selling and administrative expense, depreciation and
amortization expense and the restructuring charge
</FN>


</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4723 

To direct the Secretary of Commerce to study the Gulf of Mexico red snapper 

fishery and to limit the authority of the Secretary to promulgate any 

interim rules for the fishery, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2010 

Mr. BOYD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Commerce to study the Gulf 

of Mexico red snapper fishery and to limit the authority 

of the Secretary to promulgate any interim rules for 

the fishery, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gulf of Mexico Red 

5 Snapper Fishery Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GULF OF MEXICO RED SNAPPER FISHERY. 

7 (a) STOCK ASSESSMENT.— 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4723 IH

1 (1) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of Com2 merce shall conduct a benchmark stock assessment 

3 of the Gulf of Mexico red snapper fishery. 

4 (2) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary of 

5 Commerce shall submit to Congress a report on the 

6 findings of the assessment required by paragraph 

7 (1). 

8 (b) LIMITATION ON RULES TO SHORTEN FISHING

9 SEASON.— 

10 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Commerce 

11 may not promulgate any interim rule under section 

12 305(c) of the Magnuson–Stevens Fishery Conserva13 tion and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1855(c)) or 

14 any final rule that decreases the number of fishing 

15 days in the Gulf of Mexico red snapper fishery to 

16 less than the number of such days in 2009— 

17 (A) prior to the date the Secretary submits 

18 to Congress the report required by subsection 

19 (a)(2); and 

20 (B) unless such report demonstrates the 

21 need for any such an interim or final rule. 

22 (2) EXISTING INTERIM RULES.—Any interim 

23 rule promulgated under section 305(c) of the Mag24 nuson–Stevens Fishery Conservation and Manage25 ment Act (16 U.S.C. 1855(c)) that decreases the 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4723 IH

1 number of fishing days in the Gulf of Mexico red 

2 snapper fishery to less than the number of such days 

3 in 2009 that was promulgated prior to the date of 

4 the enactment of this Act shall have no force or ef5 fect. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

S.W., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU 

OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, ANADARKO AGENCY, 

Anadarko, OK, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0892

Issued: July 26, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On June 15, 2023 appellant filed an appeal from a May 24, 2019 merit decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 23-0892.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that it has jurisdiction to review final 

adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act (FECA).

1

 

For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review 

authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of 

OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the May 24, 2019 decision was November 20, 2019. As 

appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until June 15, 2023, more than 180 days after the

May 24, 2019 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 23-0892 is 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the 

date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.”
2

untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not 

explained his failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to 

establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP 

within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed 

as No. 23-0892, must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-0892 is dismissed.

Issued: July 26, 2023

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id.

at § 501.6(d).
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

T.S., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, CHANUTE POST 

OFFICE, Chaunte, KS, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 22-0660

Issued: June 3, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On March 16, 2022 appellant filed a timely appeal from a March 3, 2022 merit decision of

the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 22-0660.

In a letter dated April 16, 2022 and received April 25, 2022, appellant requested that the 

appeal withdrawn.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that appellant’s request for the 

withdrawal of the appeal should be granted. Accordingly, 
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the withdrawal of the appeal 

is granted. The appeal docketed as No. 22-0660 is dismissed.

Issued: June 3, 2022

Washington, D

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees' Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees' Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees' Compensation Appeals Board
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5341 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5341

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 100 Orndorf Drive in Brighton, Michigan, as the ``Joyce Rogers Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2010

  Mr. Dingell (for himself, Mr. Stupak, Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. Ehlers, Mr. 
 Camp, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Upton, Mr. Schauer, Mr. Peters, Mrs. Miller of 
Michigan, Mr. McCotter, Mr. Levin, Ms. Kilpatrick of Michigan, and Mr. 
   Conyers) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 100 Orndorf Drive in Brighton, Michigan, as the ``Joyce Rogers Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOYCE ROGERS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 100 Orndorf Drive in Brighton, Michigan, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Joyce Rogers Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Joyce 
Rogers Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** It 1s ow opinion that the boerd of truetcaa of a

oomn eahool dirtrlct ray employ lrohool bus driver and **p8~ for**  ma* out of theload miintonanoe fund although euoh ~ohool her only SO rctialrrt~ar and Ir not 0rurd eld nonool.
**rourr very**  **truly ATTQRKEY** **CbEK&RAL QF** **TEXAr**
# L_2007037EN.01000701.xml

| 9.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 37/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 37/7

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 121/2007

of 8 February 2007

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 958/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 8 February 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 8 February 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 8 February 2007, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 shall be 27,796 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 February 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 February 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1585/2006 (OJ L 294, 25.10.2006, p. 19).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 49.

2

---
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

L.B., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, 

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

Philadelphia, PA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 24-0123

Issued: January 25, 2024

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Thomas R. Uliase, Esq., for the appellant1

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On November 22, 2023 appellant, through counsel, filed a timely appeal from an 

August 16, 2023 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). 

The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned the appeal Docket No. 24-0123.

In a letter dated December 22, 2023, appellant, through counsel, requested that the appeal 

be withdrawn.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that appellant’s request for the 

withdrawal of the appeal should be granted.2 Accordingly,

1

In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for 

legal or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 20 C.F.R. 

§ 501.9(e). No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board. Id. An 

attorney or representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, subject 

to fine or imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also 18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of fees to a 

representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation.

2 The Board’s decisions and orders are final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance. 

20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d).
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the withdrawal of the appeal 

is granted. The appeal docketed as No. 24-0123 is dismissed.

Issued: January 25, 2024

Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       183,410,906
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   3,747,374
<MORTGAGE>                                  14,207,837
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  387,474
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             212,428,071
<CASH>                                       2,347,525
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             142,194
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      27,017,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             272,809,919
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            198,669,165
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         17,102,632
<POLICY-OTHER>                               1,729,899
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,829,851
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,446,672
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,063,028
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               272,809,919
<PREMIUMS>                                  20,338,601
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          6,947,689
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             131,601
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 160,712
<BENEFITS>                                   9,050,436
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     30,110
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        16,775,776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,722,281
<INCOME-TAX>                                   361,679
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,360,602
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,360,602
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-22-00376-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

IN RE BERRY CONTRACTING, LP D/B/A 

BAY LTD. AND JUAN HERNANDEZ

 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

 

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

By petition for writ of mandamus, relators Berry Contracting, LP d/b/a Bay Ltd. and 

Juan Hernandez seek to set aside a July 28, 2022 order concluding that relators “have 

failed to prove the affirmative defense of exclusive remedy” in a case concerning workers’ 

compensation. See TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 408.001(a). By motion to stay, relators seek 

to stay the underlying proceedings, including the August 22, 2022 trial of this matter. 

This Court, having examined and fully considered the relators’ motion to stay, is of 

the opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, we grant the relators’ motion to stay 
2

and order the trial court proceedings to be stayed pending further order of this Court, or 

until this case is finally decided. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). The Court requests that the 

real parties in interest, Gernal Mann and Jennifer Mann, or any others whose interest 

would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of 

mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See id. R. 

52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

16th day of August, 2022.
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

A.G., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, HOHENFELS

ARMY AIRFIELD, Hohenfels, Germany,

Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-1070

Issued: January 5, 2024

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On August 10, 2023 appellant filed a timely appeal from a March 31, 2023 merit decision of 

the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards 

assigned the appeal Docket No. 23-1070.

By letter dated December 13, 2023 and received December 29, 2023, appellant requested 

that the appeal be withdrawn.

The Board has duly considered this matter and concludes that appellant’s request for the 

withdrawal of the appeal should be granted. Accordingly, 
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the withdrawal of this appeal 

is granted. The appeal docketed as No. 23-1070 is dismissed. 

Issued: January 5, 2024

Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
j ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 06-0544 

IN RE PETITION OF MARK S. HILARIO FOR 

REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE 

BAR OF MONTANA 

-ILED 

AUG 1 3 2024 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme COurt 

State ot Montana 

ORDER 

Mark S. Hilario has petitioned for reinstatement to active status in the State Bar of 

Montana. Hilario was placed on inactive status by the State Bar of Montana pursuant to 

Rules 3B2, 5, and 12 of the Rules for Continuing Legal Education (CLE) on July 15, 2024, 

as a result of noncompliance with CLE requirements. In accordance with Rule 13 of the 

CLE Rules, Hilario has provided a letter from the State Bar certifying that Hilario has now 

completed all CLE requirements "through the reporting year that ended March 31, 2024." 

The Petition indicates Hilario is or has not been: 1) suspended, disbarred, or 

otherwise ineligible to practice of law in another jurisdiction and is not currently subject to 

disciplinary proceedings or pending disciplinary proceedings in another jurisdiction, 

2) charged with a criminal offense, 3) accrued delinquent debt or filed for bankruptcy, 

4) failed to fulfill the obligations of a public office or professional license, or 5) committed 

any violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct while on inactive status. Good cause 

appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Mark S. Hilario for reinstatement to 

active status in the State Bar of Montana is GRANTED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State 

Bar of Montana. 

DATED this , 3. day of August, 2024. 

hief Justice 

08/13/2024

Case Number: PR 06-0544
L-- ' 2e,,_,L,L,, ie' --, 

c , . ,- V. - Fos 0 - 

AI Al J.,14._ 

Justices