United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

P.B., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 

SAM RAYBURN MEMORIAL VETERANS 

CENTER, Bonham, TX, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 22-0976

Issued: April 17, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JURISDICTION

On June 9, 2022 appellant filed a timely appeal from a January 18, 2022 merit decision of 

the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Pursuant to the Federal Employees’

Compensation Act1(FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board has jurisdiction over 

the merits of this case.2

ISSUES

The issues are: (1) whether OWCP properly determined that appellant received an 

overpayment of compensation in the amount of $57,074.59 for the period May 1, 2015 through 

March 27, 2021, for which she was without fault, because she concurrently received FECA wage1 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.

2 The Board notes that, following the January 18, 2022 decision, OWCP received additional evidence. However, 

the Board’s Rules of Procedure provides: “The Board’s review of a case is limited to the evidence in the case record 

that was before OWCP at the time of its final decision. Evidence not before OWCP will not be considered by the 

Board for the first time on appeal.” 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c)(1). Thus, the Board is precluded from reviewing this 

additional evidence for the first time on appeal. Id.
2

loss compensation and Social Security Administration (SSA) age-related retirement benefits,

without an appropriate offset; (2) whether OWCP properly denied waiver of recovery of the 

overpayment; and (3) whether OWCP properly required recovery of the overpayment by deducting 

$991.47 from appellant’s continuing compensation payments every 28 days.

FACTUAL HISTORY

On February 6, 2007 appellant, then a 62-year-old nurse, filed a traumatic injury claim 

(Form CA-1) alleging that on January 23, 2007 she strained her low back when assisting a patient 

on a lift while in the performance of duty. OWCP accepted the claim for a closed dislocation of a 

lumbar vertebra. It subsequently expanded the acceptance of the claim to include degeneration of 

a lumbar or lumbosacral intervertebral disc and mechanical complication of internal orthopedic 

device, implant, and graft. After sustaining intermittent periods of disability, appellant stopped 

work on October 11, 2010 and did not return. OWCP paid her wage-loss compensation on the 

periodic rolls effective February 13, 2011. 

On March 3, 2021 OWCP sent a Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS)/SSA dual 

benefits form to SSA for completion.3 

On March 16, 2021 SSA completed the FERS/SSA dual benefits form and listed 

appellant’s monthly SSA age-related retirement benefits with and without FERS from May 2015 

through December 2019. Based on these figures, OWCP calculated that she had received an 

overpayment of $83,432.03 for the period May 1, 2015 through March 27, 2021 and issued a 

March 29, 2021 preliminary overpayment determination. 

On March 30, 2021 OWCP notified appellant that it was reducing her wage-loss 

compensation effective March 28, 2021 by the amount of her SSA benefits attributable to her

federal service. It indicated that her new net compensation every 28 days would be $3,652.19. 

On April 22, 2021 SSA completed a new FERS/SSA dual benefits form and provided 

appellant’s monthly age-related retirement benefit rates with and without FERS from May 2015 

through December 2020. SSA indicated that, effective May and December 2015, her SSA rate 

with FERS was $1,966.90 and without FERS was $1,187.40, effective December 2016, her SSA 

rate with FERS was $1,972.70 and without FERS was $1,190.90, effective December 2017, her 

SSA rate with FERS was $2,012.00 and without FERS was $1,214.60, effective December 2018, 

her SSA rate with FERS was $2,068.30 and without FERS was $1,248.50, effective 

December 2019, her SSA rate with FERS was $2,101.30 and without FERS was $1,268.50, and 

effective December 2020, her SSA rate with FERS was $2,128.50 and without FERS was 

$1,284.80. 

In a FERS offset overpayment calculation form completed April 29, 2021, OWCP 

calculated the amount that it should have offset from appellant’s compensation for each period 

from May 1, 2015 through April 24, 2021. It found that, from May 1 through November 30, 2015, 

she received an overpayment of $5,499,33; from December 1, 2015 through November 30, 2016, 

she received an overpayment of $9,405.40; from December 1, 2016 through November 30, 2017, 

she received an overpayment of $9,407.37; from December 1, 2017 through November 30, 2018, 

3 On the CA-1 form, the employing establishment indicated that appellant had FERS as her retirement system. 
3

she received an overpayment of $9,595.09; from December 1 2018 through November 30, 2019,

she received an overpayment of $9,864.63; from December 1, 2019 through November 30, 2020,

she received an overpayment of $10,048.51; and from December 1, 2020 through April 24, 2021, 

she received an overpayment of $4,033.07. Based on these amounts, OWCP calculated a total 

overpayment of $57,853.39. 

On April 29, 2021 OWCP notified appellant of its preliminary determination that she had 

received a $57,853.39 overpayment of compensation from May 1, 2015 through April 24, 2021

because she concurrently received SSA age-related retirement benefits and FECA wage-loss 

compensation without an appropriate offset. It further advised her of its preliminary determination 

that she was at fault in the creation of the overpayment. OWCP requested that appellant submit a 

completed overpayment recovery questionnaire (Form OWCP-20) to determine a reasonable 

payment method. Additionally, it provided an overpayment action request form and notified her

that, within 30 days of the date of the letter, she could request a final decision based on the written 

evidence or a prerecoupment hearing.

On April 29, 2021 OWCP determined that the corrected FERS offset amount was $778.80 

and noted that it had over deducted $359.63 during the last payment cycle. It found appellant’s 

net compensation every 28 days based on the updated information was $4,011.82. 

On April 25, 2021 appellant requested a prerecoupment hearing before a representative of 

OWCP’s Branch of Hearings and Review. She requested waiver of recovery of the overpayment, 

arguing that she was not informed that her income needed to be adjusted. Appellant submitted a 

completed OWCP-20 form. 

Following a preliminary review, by decision dated July 8, 2021, OWCP’s hearing 

representative vacated the April 29, 2021 preliminary overpayment determination. The hearing 

representative remanded the case for OWCP to explain its calculation of the overpayment and why 

appellant was at fault in the creation of the overpayment.

On July 28, 2021 OWCP notified appellant of its preliminary determination that she had 

received a $57,853.39 overpayment of compensation from May 1, 2015 through April 24, 2021

because she concurrently received SSA age-related retirement benefits and FECA wage-loss 

compensation without an appropriate offset. It set forth its calculation of the overpayment. OWCP 

further advised appellant of its preliminary determination that she was at fault in the creation of 

the overpayment. It found that she knew or should have known that an SSA annuity should be 

offset by any benefits received by OWCP. OWCP requested that appellant submit a completed 

Form OWCP-20 to determine a reasonable payment method. Additionally, it provided an 

overpayment action request form and notified her that, within 30 days of the date of the letter, she 

could request a final decision based on the written evidence or a prerecoupment hearing.

On August 18, 2021 appellant requested a prerecoupment hearing before OWCP’s Branch

of Hearings and Review. She challenged the finding that she was at fault in the creation of the 

overpayment and requested waiver of recovery of the overpayment. Appellant maintained that she 

was not informed that an adjustment should be made to her compensation and questioned why the 

amount of the overpayment had changed. She further questioned why it took OWCP so long to 

find the overpayment. Appellant submitted a completed OWCP-20 form. She reported a total of 

$8,148.19 in income; $4,453.29 in expenses; and $323,094.71 in assets. Appellant submitted 

financial documentation in support of her reported income and expenses.
4

Following a preliminary review, by decision dated November 4, 2021, OWCP’s hearing 

representative vacated the July 28, 2021 preliminary overpayment determination. The hearing 

representative found that OWCP had not cited any evidence supporting that appellant was aware 

of the required offset and remanded the case for further consideration of the issue of fault.

On December 15, 2021 OWCP notified appellant of its preliminary determination that she 

had received a $57,074.59 overpayment of compensation from May 1, 2015 through March 27, 

2021, because she concurrently received SSA age-related retirement benefits and FECA wage-loss 

compensation without an appropriate offset. It set forth its calculation of the overpayment for each 

period May 1, 2015 through March 27, 2021.4 OWCP further advised appellant of its preliminary 

determination that she was without fault in the creation of the overpayment. It requested that she 

submit a completed Form OWCP-20 to determine eligibility for waiver and to set a rate of recovery 

of the overpayment. Additionally, OWCP provided an overpayment action request form and 

notified appellant that, within 30 days of the date of the letter, she could request a final decision 

based on the written evidence, or a prerecoupment hearing.

By decision dated January 18, 2022, OWCP finalized the preliminary finding that appellant 

received an overpayment of $57,074.59 for the period May 1, 2015 through March 27, 2021

because she concurrently received SSA age-related retirement benefits and FECA wage-loss 

compensation without an appropriate offset. It explained how it had calculated the amount of the 

overpayment. OWCP further found that appellant was without fault in the creation over the 

overpayment, but denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment. It determined that she had not 

responded to its most recent preliminary overpayment determination with a completed OWCP-20 

form or provided any financial documentation supporting her waiver request. OWCP required 

recovery of the overpayment by deducting $991.47 from appellant’s continuing compensation 

payments every 28 days.

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 1

Section 8102(a) of FECA provides that the United States shall pay compensation for the 

disability or death of an employee resulting from personal injury sustained while in the 

performance of his or her duty.5 Section 8116 limits the right of an employee to receive 

compensation. While an employee is receiving compensation, he or she may not receive salary, 

pay, or remuneration of any type from the United States.6

Section 10.421(d) of OWCP’s implementing regulations requires OWCP to reduce the 

amount of compensation by the amount of any SSA age-related benefits that are attributable to the 

4 OWCP found that, from May 1 through November 30, 2015, appellant received an overpayment of $5,499.33;

from December 1, 2015 through November 30, 2016, she received an overpayment of $9,405.40; from December 1, 

2016 through November 30, 2017, she received an overpayment of $9,407.37; from December 1, 2017 through 

November 30, 2018, she received an overpayment of $9,864.63; from December 1, 2019 through November 30, 2020, 

she received an overpayment of $10,048.51; and from December 1, 2020 through March 27, 2021, she received an 

overpayment of $3,254.27.

5 5 U.S.C. § 8102(a).

6

Id. at § 8116.
5

employee’s federal service.7 FECA Bulletin No. 97-09 states that FECA benefits have to be 

adjusted for the FERS portion of SSA age-related retirement benefits because the portion of the 

SSA age-related retirement benefit earned as a federal employee is part of the FERS retirement 

package, and the receipt of FECA benefits and federal retirement concurrently is a prohibited dual 

benefit.8

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 1

The Board finds that OWCP properly determined that appellant received an overpayment 

of wage-loss compensation in the amount of $57,074.59 for the period May 1, 2015 through 

March 27, 2021, for which she was without fault, because she concurrently received FECA wageloss compensation benefits and SSA age-related retirement benefits, without an appropriate offset. 

OWCP paid appellant wage-loss compensation for partial disability on the periodic rolls 

beginning February 13, 2011. Appellant received SSA age-related retirement benefits beginning

May 1, 2015. As noted, a claimant cannot receive concurrent FECA compensation for wage-loss 

and SSA age-related retirement benefits attributable to federal service.9 The information provided 

by SSA indicated that a portion of appellant’s SSA age-related retirement benefits were 

attributable to appellant’s federal service. Accordingly, the Board finds that fact of overpayment 

has been established.10 

To determine the amount of the overpayment, the portion of SSA age-related retirement 

benefits attributable to federal service must be calculated. OWCP received documentation from 

SSA with respect to the specific amount of SSA age-related retirement benefits that were 

attributable to federal service. SSA provided appellant’s SSA age-related retirement benefit rates 

with FERS and without FERS from May 2015 through December 2020. OWCP provided its 

calculations for each relevant period based on SSA’s dual benefits form and determined that she

received an overpayment in the amount of $57,074.59. The Board has reviewed OWCP’s 

calculation of dual benefits received by appellant for the period May 1, 2015 through March 27, 

2021 and finds that an overpayment of compensation in the amount of $57,074.59 was created.11

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 2

Section 8129 of FECA12 provides that an overpayment must be recovered unless incorrect 

payment has been made to an individual who is without fault and when adjustment or recovery 

would defeat the purpose of FECA or would be against equity and good conscience. Thus, a 

finding that appellant was without fault does not automatically result in waiver of the overpayment. 

7 20 C.F.R. § 10.421(d); see S.M., Docket No. 17-1802 (issued August 20, 2018).

8 FECA Bulletin No. 97-09 (issued February 3, 1997); see also N.B., Docket No. 18-0795 (issued January 4, 2019).

9 Supra note 7; see F.K., Docket No. 20-1609 (issued June 24, 2021); A.C., Docket No. 18-1550 (issued 

February 21, 2019).

10 See L.K., Docket No. 20-1574 (issued June 23, 2021); S.H., Docket No. 20-1157 (issued December 23, 2020).

11 See J.S., Docket No. 22-0369 (issued June 7, 2022); N.B., Docket No. 20-0727 (issued January 26, 2021); L.L., 

Docket No. 18-1103 (issued March 5, 2019).

12 Supra note 1.
6

OWCP must exercise its discretion to determine whether recovery of the overpayment would 

defeat the purpose of FECA or would be against equity and good conscience.13

According to 20 C.F.R. § 10.436, recovery of an overpayment would defeat the purpose of 

FECA if recovery would cause hardship because the beneficiary needs substantially all of his or 

her income (including compensation benefits) to meet current ordinary and necessary living 

expenses, and also, if the beneficiary’s assets do not exceed a specified amount as determined by 

OWCP from data provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.14 An individual’s liquid assets 

include, but are not limited to, cash on hand, the value of stocks, bonds, savings accounts, mutual 

funds, and certificates of deposits. Nonliquid assets include, but are not limited to, the fair market 

value of an owner’s equity in property such as a camper, boat, second home, furnishings/supplies, 

vehicle(s) above the two allowed per immediate family, retirement account balances (such as TSP 

or 401(k)), jewelry, and artwork.15

Section 10.437 provides that recovery of an overpayment is against equity and good 

conscience when an individual who received an overpayment would experience severe financial 

hardship attempting to repay the debt and when an individual, in reliance on such payments or on 

notice that such payments would be made, gives up a valuable right or changes her position for the 

worse.16

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 2

The Board finds that OWCP properly denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment.

As OWCP found appellant without fault in the creation of the overpayment, waiver must 

be considered, and repayment is still required unless adjustment or recovery of the overpayment 

would defeat the purpose of FECA or be against equity and good conscience.17 

Appellant submitted an OWCP-20 form, wherein she reported a total of $8,148.19 in 

income; $4,453.29 in expenses; and $323,094.71 in assets. She submitted financial documentation 

in support of her reported income and expenses. The Board finds that, as appellant reported 

$323,094.71 in assets on her Form OWCP-20 she did not meet the standard for waiver of recovery 

of the overpayment because her assets exceed the allowable resource base of $10,300.00 for an 

individual with a spouse, such as appellant.18 Furthermore, appellant provided financial 

13 I.R., Docket No. 22-0088 (issued May 5, 2022); G.L., Docket No. 19-0297 (issued October 23, 2019).

14 20 C.F.R. § 10.436. OWCP procedures provide that a claimant is deemed to need substantially all his or her 

current net income to meet current ordinary and necessary living expenses if monthly income does not exceed monthly 

expenses by more than $50.00. Its procedures further provide that assets must not exceed a resource base of $6,200.00 

for an individual or $10,300.00 for an individual with a spouse or dependent plus $1,200.00 for each additional 

dependent. Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 6 -- Debt Management, Final Overpayment Determinations, 

Chapter 6.400.4a(2) and (3) (September 2020).

15 Id. at Chapter 6.400.4b(3)(a), (b).

16 20 C.F.R. § 10.437(b)(1).

17 See J.R., Docket No .17-0181 (issued August 12, 2020); L.S., 59 ECAB 350 (2008).

18 Supra note 15 at Chapter 6.400.4c(3) (September 2020).
7

information regarding her monthly household income and expenses, which demonstrated that she 

had no less than $3,694.90 in monthly discretionary income. The Board finds that this evidence 

establishes that recovery of the overpayment would not defeat the purpose of FECA.19

The Board further finds that appellant has not established that recovery of the overpayment 

would be against equity and good conscience because she has not shown, for the reasons noted 

above, that she would experience severe financial hardship in attempting to repay the debt or that 

she relinquished a valuable right or changed her position for the worse in reliance on the payment 

which created the overpayment. Therefore, OWCP properly found that recovery of the 

overpayment would not defeat the purpose of FECA or be against equity and good conscience.20

Because appellant has not established that recovery of the overpayment would defeat the 

purpose of FECA or be against equity and good conscience, the Board finds that OWCP properly 

denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment.21

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 3

The Board’s jurisdiction over recovery of an overpayment is limited to reviewing those 

cases where OWCP seeks recovery from continuing compensation under FECA.22

Section 10.441 of OWCP’s regulations23 provides that, when an overpayment has been 

made to an individual who is entitled to further payments, the individual shall refund to OWCP 

the amount of the overpayment as the error is discovered or his or her attention is called to the 

same. If no refund is made, OWCP shall decrease later payments of compensation, taking into 

account the probable extent of future payments, the rate of compensation, the financial 

circumstances of the individual, and any other relevant factors, so as to minimize any hardship.24

19 20 C.F.R. § 10.441(a).

20 P.M., Docket No. 21-0915 (issued December 14, 2021); M.R., Docket No. 20-1622 (issued June 30, 2021); L.D., 

Docket No. 18-1317 (issued April 17, 2019); William J. Murphy, 41 ECAB 569, 571-72 (1989).

21 P.M., id.; F.K., Docket No. 20-1609 (issued June 24, 2021); D.M., Docket No. 17-0810 (issued October 2, 2017).

22 20 C.F.R. § 10.441; see T.T., Docket No. 20-1257 (issued July 29, 2022); M.P., Docket No. 18-0902 (issued 

October 16, 2018).

23 Supra note 19.

24 Id.; see L.G., Docket No. 19-1274 (issued July 10, 2020); C.M., Docket No. 19-1451 (issued March 4, 2020).
8

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 3

The Board finds that OWCP properly required recovery of the overpayment by deducting 

$991.47 from appellant’s continuing compensation payments every 28 days.

OWCP properly considered the factors set forth in 20 C.F.R. § 10.441(a) in setting the rate 

of recovery at $991.47.00 from continuing compensation payments to minimize hardship, while 

at the same time liquidating the debt in a reasonably prompt fashion. There is no evidence of 

record to establish that OWCP erred in directing recovery of the overpayment at the rate of $991.47 

from appellant’s continuing compensation payments every 28 days.25

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that OWCP properly determined that appellant received an overpayment 

of compensation in the amount of $57,074.59 for the period May 1, 2015 through March 27, 2021, 

for which she was without fault, because she concurrently received FECA wage-loss compensation 

benefits and SSA age-related retirement benefits, without an appropriate offset. The Board further 

finds that OWCP properly denied waiver of recovery of the overpayment and properly required 

recovery of the overpayment by deducting $991.47 from her continuing compensation payments 

every 28 days.

25 See E.K., Docket No. 18-0587 (issued October 1, 2018); S.B., Docket No. 16-1795 (issued March 2, 2017).
9

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the January 18, 2022 decision of the Office of 

Workers’ Compensation Programs is affirmed.

Issued: April 17, 2023

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board