alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1


 


UCOMMUNE INTERNATIONAL LTD


Floor 8, Tower D


No.2 Guang Hua Road


Chaoyang District, Beijing


People’s Republic of China, 100026


 


March 1, 2022


 


JAK Opportunities LLC


17 State Street, 2100


New York, New York 10004


 


Re: Debenture


 


Dear Sirs and Madams:


 


Reference is made to the Debenture, dated January
26, 2022 (the “Debenture”), between Ucommune International Ltd and JAK Opportunities LLC (the “Holder”),
as the holder thereof. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Debenture.


 


Upon execution of this letter agreement, the Debenture
shall be amended to add the following Section 9(j):


 


“j) Floor for Conversion
Price of the Debentures. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Transaction Documents, the Conversion Price of the Debentures
shall in no event be lower than $0.30 (the “Floor Price”). The Floor Price shall be proportionately decreased upon
a stock split or share subdivision of Ordinary Shares, and shall be proportionately increased in the case of a reverse stock split or
share combination of Ordinary Shares. The Company agrees that while the Debentures remain outstanding, it will not issue Ordinary Shares
or Ordinary Share Equivalents at a price per share or with a conversion or exercise price per share, as applicable, that is below the
Floor Price without the prior written consent of the Holder.”


 


The Debenture and this letter
agreement shall be read together and shall have the same effect as if the Debenture and this letter agreement were contained in one document.
Except as expressly modified by this letter agreement, the terms and obligations of the Debenture and the Transaction Documents remain
unchanged and the Debenture and Transaction Documents shall continue in full force and effect.


 


This letter agreement shall
be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York, without regard to the conflict of laws principles
thereof.


 




    


     


    

 


If you are in agreement with
the foregoing, please have this letter agreement executed by your authorized representative and return a copy to the undersigned.


 


	 	Very Truly Yours,
	 	 	 
	 	UCOMMUNE INTERNATIONAL LTD
	 	 	                       
	 	By: 	/s/ Xin Guan
	 	Name: 	Xin Guan
	 	Title:	CEO



 


	Confirmed and Agreed to:	
	 	 	 
	JAK Opportunities
    LLC	
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Antonio
    Ruiz-Gimenez	
	Name: 	Antonio Ruiz-Gimenez	
	Title:	Managing Partner
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 9, 2009

1215 

# Order

January 9, 2009

137515

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137515 COA: 286715 Oakland CC: 05-204178-FH RONALD WILLIAM ATKINSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 25, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

H ATHAWAY 

### , J., not participating.
**Exhibit 23.1**
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
The Board of DirectorsGrey Wolf, Inc.:
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration StatementNos. 33-34590, 33-75338, 333-19027, 333-65049, 333-41334, and 333-90888 on FormS-8 of Grey Wolf, Inc. and Registration Statement Nos. 333-14783,333-06077,333-26519, 333-20423, 333-36593, 333-39683, 333-86949, 333-40874, and333-106997 on Form S-3 of Grey Wolf, Inc. of our report dated January 30, 2004,with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Grey Wolf, Inc. as ofDecember 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows foreach of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, and therelated financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31,2003 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Grey Wolf, Inc.
Houston, TexasAugust 6, 2004
## NO. 12

- 0 9

- 00 4 5 0

- C R

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

DARWIN CHARMAINE BOYD,

APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 241ST

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, ' SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM O PINION

Appellant pleaded guilty to aggravated kidnapping. We have received the trial

court's certification showing that this is a plea bargain case and Appellant has no right to

appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d). The certification further shows that Appellant has

waived the right to appeal. The certification is signed by Appellant and his counsel and

is supported by the record. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction

.

BRIAN HOYLE

__ Justice

Opinion delivered February 26 , 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 10.1.17


                        DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

         This Agreement made as of the 15th day of June 2001, by and between
ROBERTS PROPERTIES RESIDENTIAL, L.P., a Georgia limited partnership (the
"Partnership"), and ROBERTS PROPERTIES, INC., a Georgia corporation (the
"Developer"),

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

         WHEREAS, the Partnership has acquired approximately 10.930 acres in
Land Lots 25 and 26 of the 17th District and in Land Lots 385 and 386 of the
18th District and approximately 2.082 acres located in Land Lot 25 of the 17th
District, Fulton County, Georgia, fronting on Northridge Parkway, and the
Partnership intends to develop, construct, own and operate on the Property a 220
unit apartment community ("Northridge"); and

         WHEREAS, the Partnership desires that the Developer perform certain
advisory, administrative and supervisory services relating to the Partnership's
design, development and construction of Northridge;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

                                       1.

                                    Services

         The Developer will create and develop Northridge and manage the team of
professionals involved, including engineers, land planners, architects and
designers, and manage the design team involved in developing the interior design
and models, as well as selecting the materials, finishes, features and colors
for Northridge. The Developer shall also provide supervisory services to ensure
that Northridge is built in accordance with the approved Plans and
Specifications provided.

                                       2.

                                  Compensation

         For the above services, the Developer shall be paid a total of Five
Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($550,000), payable upon demand by the
Developer.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as
of the date first above written.

ROBERTS PROPERTIES RESIDENTIAL,           ROBERTS PROPERTIES, INC., a
L.P., a Georgia limited partnership                Georgia corporation

By:  Roberts Realty Investors, Inc.,      By: /s/ Anthony W. Shurtz
     its General Partner                     ---------------------------------
                                              Anthony W. Shurtz, Chief Financial
                                              Officer

By:    /s/ Charles R. Elliott
   ---------------------------------------------
    Charles R. Elliott, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Pauline Schneider, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of House of Taylor Jewelry, Inc.  on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of House of Taylor Jewelry, Inc.  Date: April 16, 2007   /S/ Pauline SchneiderName:Pauline SchneiderTitle:Chief Financial Officer
#### Placido Aparicio JIMENEZ, Petitioner, v. *149Alberto GONZALES,* Respondent.

No. 03-73700.

Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 2005.**

Decided April 4, 2005.

Placido Aparicio Jimenez, Anaheim, CA, pro se.

Regional Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Mark C. Walters, Esq., Jennifer L. Lightbody, Esq., DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before B. FLETCHER, TROTT and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Placido Aparicio Jimenez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ dismissal of his appeal of an Immigration Judge’s denial of his request for cancellation of removal. Aparicio Jimenez asserts that he should be placed in deportation proceedings rather than in removal proceedings.

We lack jurisdiction to consider the former Immigration and Naturalization Service’s decision regarding the commencement of immigration proceedings. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g); *Jimenez-Angeles v. Ashcroft,*291 F.3d 594, 599 (9th Cir.2002). Aparicio Jimenez’s contention that placing him in removal rather than deportation proceedings violates his constitutional rights lacks merit. Removal proceedings against him commenced after April 1, 1997, and therefore the permanent rules of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 apply. *Cortez-Felipe v. INS,*245 F.3d 1054, 1056 (9th Cir.2001).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>


                                                                       EXHIBIT 4


                  NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION CORP.
                          AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
                   -------------------------------------------
                 INSTRUMENTS DEFINING RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS
                              INCLUDING INDENTURES


     The following  instruments of Navistar  International  Transportation Corp.
and its principal subsidiary Navistar Financial  Corporation defining the rights
of security holders are incorporated herein by reference.

         4.1    Indenture,   dated  as  of  March  1,  1968,   between  Navistar
                International  Transportation  Corp. and  Manufacturers  Hanover
                Trust Company, as Trustee, and succeeded by FIDATA Trust Company
                of New York,  as  successor  Trustee,  for 6 1/4%  Sinking  Fund
                Debentures due 1998 for  $50,000,000.  Filed on Registration No.
                2-28150.

         4.2    Indenture,   dated  as  of  June  15,  1974,   between  Navistar
                International  Transportation Corp. and Harris Trust and Savings
                Bank,  as Trustee,  and  succeeded by Commerce  Union Bank,  now
                known as Sovran Bank/Central South, as successor Trustee, for 9%
                Sinking  Fund  Debentures  due 2004 for  $150,000,000.  Filed on
                Registration No. 2-51111.

         4.3    Indenture,  dated as of  November  15,  1993,  between  Navistar
                Financial  Corporation  and Bank of America,  Illinois  formerly
                known as Continental Bank, National Association, as Trustee, for
                8 7/8%  Senior  Subordinated  Notes  due 1998 for  $100,000,000.
                Filed on Registration No. 33-50541.

         4.4    Indenture,  dated as of May 30,  1997,  by and between  Navistar
                Financial  Corporation  and The Fuji Bank and Trust Company,  as
                Trustee,   for  9%  Senior   Subordinated  Notes  due  2002  for
                $100,000,000. Filed on Registration No. 333-30167.


======

    Instruments  defining the rights of holders of other unregistered  long-term
debt of Transportation  and its subsidiaries have been omitted from this exhibit
index because the amount of debt  authorized  under any such instrument does not
exceed  10%  of  the  total  assets  of  the  Registrant  and  its  consolidated
subsidiaries.  The Registrant agrees to furnish a copy of any such instrument to
the Commission upon request.








                                       E-2
Exhibit 31
 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves persons who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  Date: March 1, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Lee Ann AndersonLee Ann AndersonVice President and Senior Trust Officer,
Compass Bank
Exhibit 99(ii)


                            FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                         SEARS 401(k) PROFIT SHARING TRUST


WHEREAS, Sears, Roebuck and Co. (the "Company") and State Street Bank and
Trust Company (the "Trustee") executed a trust agreement known as the Sears
401(k) Profit Sharing Trust Agreement (As Amended and Restated effective as
of January 1, 1998) (the "Trust").

WHEREAS, pursuant to subsection 13.1 of the Trust, the Company reserved the
right to amend the Trust, provided that any amendment changing the rights,
duties and liabilities of the Trustee may be made with its consent;

WHEREAS, the Trustee has consented to the assignment of determining in its
sole discretion whether a proposed refinancing of an ESOP Loan is in
accordance with the requirements of ERISA;

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the amending power reserved to the Company by
subsection 13.1 of the Trust, the Trust be, and hereby is, amended by adding
the following new Section 4.5A to the Trust effective as of January 1, 1998:

 "4.5A.  Refinancing of ESOP Loans.  With respect to the refinancing of any
ESOP Loan, the Trustee shall be an independent fiduciary and assume the
exclusive responsibility for determining whether the terms and conditions of
any refinancing satisfy the trustee's duties and responsibilities under
ERISA, and the Company and Trustee may separately agree to the terms and
conditions of such engagement.  Notwithstanding any provision to the
contrary, the Trustee is limited in its ability to refinance an ESOP Loan to
those refinancing proposals presented to it by the Company.  In effectuating
the refinancing of an ESOP Loan, the Trustee shall have the power to take all
actions necessary to refinance all or a portion of such ESOP Loans, either by
extending or shortening the maturities of existing ESOP Loans or by allowing
the Company to loan an amount to the trust which is used to repay an existing
loan, and for any sum so borrowed, to issue its promissory note as trustee,
to pledge any securities or other property of the fund for the repayment of
such loan, to repay from time to time the principal and interest on such loan
with any such borrowing or refinancing and to execute any documents,
instruments or certificates to effectuate such borrowing or refinancing; and
provided further that if any ESOP Loan is from, or guaranteed by, a "party in
interest" within the meaning of Section 3(14) of ERISA, the requirements of
Section 6.2(a)-(i) shall be satisfied."


FURTHER, the officers of the Company be, and hereby are, authorized to take
whatever actions are necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of the
foregoing amendments.

SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.


By: /s/ James Constantine
        James Constantine
Its:    pursuant to Power of Attorney
        for Alice M. Peterson,
        Vice President and Treasurer
Date:   June 26, 1998


AGREED AND CONSENTED TO BY
STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY



By:   /s/James S. Phalen
         James S. Phalen
Its:  Executive Vice President
Date: June 26, 1998
##### 



EXHIBIT 23 [Cawley, Gillespie

& Associates, Inc., letterhead] March 7, 2005 San Juan Basin Royalty

Trust
TexasBank, Trust Department
2525 Ridgmar Boulevard, Suite 100
Fort Worth, Texas 76116 Ladies and Gentlemen: Cawley, Gillespie &

Associates, Inc. hereby consents to the use of the oil and gas

reserve
information in the San Juan Basin Royalty Trust Securities &

Exchange Commission Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004 and in the San Juan Basin

Royalty Trust Annual Report for the year
ended December 31, 2004 based on reserve reports prepared by

Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.
and dated March 3, 2005. Sincerely, /s/

Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc. CAWLEY,

GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
#### SELF v. ASSURANCE CO.

No. 72 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 558.

Petition by defendant Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co. for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 November 1976.
#### Glenn J. DAIGLE v. HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Submitted on Briefs April 25, 1990.

Decided May 3, 1990.

*792Rudolph Pelletier, Madawaska, for plaintiff.

Richard Engels, Presque Isle, for defendant.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD, HORNBY, and COLLINS, JJ.

McKUSICK, Chief Justice.

In 1983 Glenn J. Daigle was injured when the motorcycle he owned and operated collided with a ear operated by an "uninsured driver. At the time of the accident Daigle was living with his father, who had an automobile insurance policy issued by Hartford Casualty Insurance Company. Under the terms of the Hartford policy, Daigle was a “covered person” although his motorcycle was not insured for coverage under the policy. Several years later, Daigle sued Hartford to recover payments under the uninsured motorist clause of the Hartford policy. The Superior Court (Aroostook County, *Pierson, J.)*dismissed Daigle’s complaint, and we affirm.

The uninsured motorist clause of the Hartford policy contains the following exclusion:

> A. We do not provide Uninsured Motorists Coverage for bodily injury sustained by any person:

> 1. While occupying, or when struck by, any motor vehicle owned by you or any family member which is not insured for this coverage under this policy. ...

Daigle’s sole contention on appeal is that his motorcycle is not a “motor vehicle” as that term is used in the policy, and that therefore he does not come within the exclusion from uninsured motorist coverage. We have previously held this exclusion to be applicable in a case factually on all fours with the case at bar. *Gross v. Green Mountain Ins. Co.,*506 A.2d 1139, 1141 (Me.1986). We there held by necessary implication that a motorcycle is indeed a motor vehicle. And so it is by the plain, commonly accepted meaning of the term “motor vehicle.” *See Brackett v. Middle-sex Ins. Co.,*486 A.2d 1188, 1190 (Me.1985).

At the time of the accident Daigle was occupying a motor vehicle that he owned and that was not insured for any type of coverage under his father’s policy with Hartford. Uninsured motorist coverage for his injuries is specifically, unambiguously excluded by the terms of the policy.

The entry is: Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














Dated:April 2, 2018/s/ David J. MazzoDavid J. Mazzo, PhDPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Dated:April 2, 2018/s/ Joseph TalamoJoseph TalamoSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2008006EN.01000601.xml

| 11.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4983 — Lion Capital/AS Lathouwers)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 6/02)

On 7 January 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M4983. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M4983. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---