alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1999
<CASH>                                      17,881,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,335,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   500,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,770,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,502,000
<PP&E>                                     145,427,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             107,353,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              78,862,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       35,120,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    128,232,00
<OTHER-SE>                                (97,627,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                78,862,000
<SALES>                                    106,147,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           106,147,000
<CGS>                                       89,844,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               89,844,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,429,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,872,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (29,531,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (29,531,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (29,531,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.53)
        

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Strategic Internet
Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"). I, Abbas Salih, Chief Financial Officer of the
company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: | November 16, 2010 |  | /s/
      Abbas Salih     
|----- | ----------------- |  | --------------------------
|      |                   |  | Abbas Salih, CFO, Director

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              THIS   SCHEDULE    CONTAINS   SUMMARY    FINANCIAL
                              INFORMATION    EXTRACTED   FROM   THE   INTER-TEL,
                              INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                              FOR  THE  YEAR  ENDED  DECEMBER  31,  1997  AND IS
                              QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
                              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                              U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1
<CASH>                                        88,805
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 35,956
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,722
<INVENTORY>                                   21,539
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             157,399
<PP&E>                                        38,590
<DEPRECIATION>                                19,031
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               194,988
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         33,585
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      99,229
<OTHER-SE>                                    46,276
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 194,988
<SALES>                                      223,569
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             223,569
<CGS>                                        122,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                122,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               4,104
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               24,602
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9,920
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           14,682
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  14,682
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.57


</TABLE>
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Jennifer Jill Whitehead, Appellant

No. 06

- 13

- 00054

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 3rd District Court of Anderson County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No.
30256 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial cour t

. We note that the appellant, Jennifer Jill Whitehead, has adequately indicated h er inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDE RED JUNE 19, 2014
BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



               [Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc., letterhead]




                                 March 21, 2003


San Juan Basin Royalty Trust
TexasBank, Trust Department
2525 Ridgmar Boulevard
Fort Worth, Texas 76116

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc. hereby consents to the use of the
oil and gas reserve information in the San Juan Basin Royalty Trust Securities &
Exchange Commission Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and in the
San Juan Basin Royalty Trust Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2002
based on reserve reports prepared by Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc. and
dated March 21, 2003.

                                       Sincerely,


                                       /s/ Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
# C_2007099EN.01000101.xml

| 3.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 99/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 99/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4595 — Vestar/Carlyle/AZ)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 99/01)

On 27 March 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4595. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4595. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
# C_2007272EN.01000101.xml

| 15.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4868 — Avnet/Magirus EID)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 272/01)

On 5 October 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4868. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4868. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Motion Granted and Order filed March 10, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00195-CV

____________

IN RE ALI CHOUDHRI, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

190th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-27197

ORDER

On March 10, 2014, relator Ali Choudhri filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus with this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. 

P. 52. In his petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Patricia 

Kerrigan, Judge of the 190th District Court of Harris County, to vacate her order 

dated March 4, 2014, entered in trial court cause number 2012-27197, styled
2

Mokaram-Latif West Loop, Ltd. v. Choudhri, et al. Relator claims the trial court

abused its discretion by overruling relator’s objections to the Special Master’s 

order compelling the production of relator’s tax returns.

Relator also has filed with this Court a motion for temporary stay. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. On March 10, 2014, relator asked this Court to stay 

enforcement of any orders in the underlying litigation requiring relator to disclose 

his tax returns pending a decision on the petition for writ of mandamus.

It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relator’s 

request for relief requires further consideration and that relator will be prejudiced 

unless immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relator’s 

motion and issue the following order:

We ORDER that the enforcement of all orders in trial court cause number 

2012-27197, styled Mokaram-Latif West Loop, Ltd. v. Choudhri, et al., requiring 

relator to disclose his tax returns be STAYED until a final decision by this Court 

on relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, or until further order of this Court.

We further ORDER relator to file under seal with the Clerk of this Court on 

or before March 14, 2014 certified or sworn copies of Exhibit Nos. 1–4 that were 

admitted into evidence by the trial court at the February 20, 2014 hearing in the 

underlying litigation. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and Brown.
# EUR-Lex - 32007M4527 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32007M4527

**Commission Decision of 02/02/2007 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.4527 - SUN CAPITAL / GOLDEN GATE / BAUER) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

Brussels, 02.II.2007

SG-Greffe(2007) D/200503/4

To the notifying parties

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No. COMP/M.4527 - SUN CAPITAL / GOLDEN GATE / BAUER

Notification of 22.12.2006 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1]

Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 4/6 of 9/01/2007.

1. On 22.12.2006, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the aforementioned Council Regulation by which Sun Capital Securities Group LLC, an affiliate of Sun Capital Partners Inc. (“Sun Capital”, USA.) and Golden Gate Capital Private Equity Inc. ("Golden Gate", USA) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of Eddie Bauer Holdings, Inc. (“Eddie Bauer”, USA) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Sun Capital : private equity investment, active in a variety of sectors, including, via its portfolio companies Dim Branded Apparel ("DBA"), and Lee Cooper, in the production and distribution of men and women's apparel, accessories, jeans and footwear;

- for Golden Gate : private equity investment fund;

- for Eddie Bauer: retail of sportswear, mainly active in the USA, with European sales mainly in Germany.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5 (b) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

signed

Philip LOWE

Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32

--------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 211 (Wednesday, November 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 66448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21826]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, Mechanisms of Mammalian Sperm 
Capacitation.
    Date: November 23, 2005.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Jon M. Ranhand, PhD, Scientist Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6884. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a9dbc8c7c1c8c7cdc3e9c4c8c0c587c7c0c187cec6df"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1e6c7f70767f707a745e737f77723070777630797168">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 25, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-21826 Filed 11-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

Pioneer Drilling Company: 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-48286, 333-110569 and 333-153180) on Form S-8 of Pioneer Drilling Company of our reports dated February 25, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of PioneerDrilling Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2008, the ninemonths ended December 31, 2007 and the year ended March 31, 2007, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form10-K of Pioneer Drilling Company. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

San Antonio,Texas 

February 25, 2009
# C_2008059EN.01000101.xml

| 4.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 59/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4827 — Rio Tinto/Alcan)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 59/01)

On 2 October 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4827. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4827. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00517

- CR

Frederick O'Neal Scott

v. The State of Texas

On a ppeal from the 24th District Court of De Witt County , Texas Trial Cause No. 14

- 05

- 12,033

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered thi s cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 21, 2016
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

KENNETH LYDELL JACKSON,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-3990

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed June 1, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Marion County,

Edward L. Scott, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and 

Brittany N. O'Neil, Assistant Public 

Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Lydell Jackson appeals the partial denial of his motion to correct sentence 

filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Jackson, who was sixteen years 

old at the time of his offenses, entered open pleas to burglary of a conveyance while 

armed (count I), attempted robbery with a firearm (count II), and possession of a firearm 
2

by a delinquent (count III). He was sentenced to concurrent twenty-five year terms of 

prison on counts I and II. On count III, he received a concurrent fifteen-year prison 

sentence. In his rule 3.800(a) motion, Jackson argued that he was entitled to a full 

resentencing hearing and a judicial review of his sentence. The trial court granted 

Jackson’s motion, in part, amending the sentencing documents to allow for a juvenile 

sentence review hearing, but denying a new resentencing hearing.

This Court has previously held that it is error to modify a juvenile defendant’s 

sentence to allow for a review hearing without also holding a resentencing hearing under 

sections 775.082, 921.1401 and 921.1402, Florida Statutes. Ruiz v. State, 43 Fla. L. 

Weekly D1015 (Fla. 5th DCA May 11, 2018); Katwaroo v. State, 237 So. 3d 446 (Fla. 5th 

DCA 2018); Davis v. State, 230 So. 3d 487 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017). Jackson’s situation is 

identical. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order amending the sentencing 

documents to provide for a review hearing, but reverse and remand to allow the court to 

conduct a full resentencing hearing.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED

ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

BERGER, J., concurring specially.
3

BERGER, J., concurring specially. 5D17-3990

I concur based on this Court’s decisions in Ruiz v. State, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D1015 

(Fla. 5th DCA May 4, 2018), Katwaroo v. State, 237 So. 3d 446 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018), and 

Davis v. State, 230 So. 3d 487, 488 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017). However, were I writing on a 

clean slate, I would affirm. In my view, Jackson is not entitled to resentencing under 

Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010), or Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), 

because his sentences are not de facto life sentences. See, e.g., Davis v. State, 214 So. 

3d 799, 799-800 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).