alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the quarterly report of eCOST.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation, on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Elizabeth Murray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 12, 2005 |  | /s/  Elizabeth Murray  
|                   |  | Elizabeth Murray       
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### NEVADA NATIONAL BANK, a Banking Corporation, Appellant, v. JEFF HUNT and ZANE HUNT, Individually and Doing Business as HUNT BROS., Respondents.

No. 7644

March 27, 1975

533 P.2d 161

*Guild, Hagen & Clark, Ltd.,*and *Thomas J. Hall,*of Reno, for Appellant.

*Wilson and Wilson, Ltd.,*of Elko, for Respondents.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

A jury returned its general verdict for the plaintiffs awarding a lump sum as damages. It is contended that the award improperly includes money for loss of profits; The court did not instruct the jury regarding loss of profits as an item Of damages. Written interrogatories were not submitted to the jury on the issue of damages. The record may be read to support the lump sum award. However, we do not deem the appeal frivolous as the respondents suggest.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-2000
<CASH>                                          15,340
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,779
<ALLOWANCES>                                       395
<INVENTORY>                                    250,265
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               392,524
<PP&E>                                         157,250
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,920
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 523,688
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          168,999
<BONDS>                                        335,582
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,697)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   523,688
<SALES>                                        529,251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               529,251
<CGS>                                          381,585
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  381,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                67,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   664
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,973
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,938
<INCOME-TAX>                                       809
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,129
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,129
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Strategic Internet
Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"). I, Abbas Salih, Chief Financial Officer of the company,
certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: | June 9,
      2006 |  | /s/ Abbas
      Salih     
|----- | ------------------ |  | --------------------------
|      |                    |  | Abbas Salih, CFO, Director

---
Irwin Financial Corporation amends its Form 10-Q filed for
the quarter ending March 31, 1999.  The amended entry is
flagged with an "*" at the beginning and end.



Derivative Financial Instruments

      The Corporation hedges its interest rate risk on
mortgage loans held for sale using mandatory commitments to
sell the loans at a future date.  The economic value of
mortgage servicing assets are hedged using options on
treasury futures.  At March 31, 1999, these options had a
fair value of $0.8 million and a notional amount (which does
not represent the amount at risk) of *$337.5 million.*
Interest-only strips are hedged using interest rate caps
which had a fair value of $0.6 million at March 31, 1999,
and a notional amount of $61.4 million.  Options on treasury
futures and interest rate caps are classified as trading
assets on the balance sheet and carried at their market
values.  Adjustments to market values are recorded as net
trading gains or losses on the income statement.  In the
first quarter of 1999, the Corporation recorded $10.0
million of trading losses related to these derivative
products.  No gains or losses were reported in the first
quarter of 1998.


                          SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.



June 4, 1999                  IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION





                                 /s/ Marie S. Ameis
                                 Corporate Controller
                                 (Chief Accounting Officer)
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION                                                             
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350                                        
|As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Strategic Internet
Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"). I, Ralph Shearing, Chief Executive Officer of the
company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: July 25, 2007 |  | /s/
      Ralph Shearing     
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                    |  | Ralph Shearing, CEO, Director

---
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5551 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to make a certification when making 

purchases under the Small Business Lending Fund Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2010 

Ms. KOSMAS (for herself and Mr. DRIEHAUS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to make a certification when making purchases under the Small Business 

Lending Fund Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTIFICATION UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS 

4 LENDING FUND PROGRAM. 

5 Each time the Secretary of the Treasury makes a 

6 purchase (including a commitment to purchase) or a modi7 fication of a purchase under the Small Business Lending 

8 Fund Program established under the Small Business Jobs 

9 and Credit Act of 2010, the Secretary shall certify, under 

10 oath, to the Inspector General of the Department of the 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5551 IH

1 Treasury, with a copy to the Comptroller General of the 

2 United States, that the Secretary of the Treasury is acting 

3 solely on the basis of economic fundamentals and not be4 cause of any political considerations. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
NAME TITLE OFFICE GRADE STEP SALARY

Anderson, Byron Special Assistant to the Secretary Office of the Secretary 15 10 $161,900.00

Blau, Robert Special Assistant to the Secretary Office of the Secretary 15 10 $161,900.00

Bolen, Derrick Special Assistant to the Secretary Office of the Secretary 7 7 $53,932.00

Bozzuto, Robert White House Liaison Office of the Secretary $176,000.00

Burr, Geoffrey Special Assistant to the Secretary Office of the Secretary $179,700.00

Cheewing, Todd Special Assistant to the Secretary Office of the Secretary 9 2 $56,805.00

Conway, Molly Special Assistant to the Secretary Office of the Secretary 15 7 $158,123.00

Ellis, Curtis Special Assistant to the Secretary Office of the Secretary 15 10 $161,900.00

Evans, Eric Special Assistant to the Secretary Office of the Secretary 14 1 $112,021.00

Gardner, Janelle Special Assistant to the Secretary Office of the Secretary 15 1 $131,767.00

Geale, Nicholas Deputy Solictor Office of the Solictor $161,900.00

Kopley, Russell Special Assistant to the Secretary Office of the Secretary 10 1 $60,538.00

Lineberger, Timothy Special Assistant to the Secretary Office of the Secretary 11 5 $75,377.00

Mannix, Patrick Special Assistant to the Secretary Office of the Secretary 13 1 $94,796.00

Mehrens, Nathan Special Assistant to the Secretary Office of the Secretary 15 5 $149,337.00

Palmer, Wayne Senior White House Advisor Office of the Secretary $179,700.00

Patterson, Andrew Special Assistant to the Secretary Office of the Secretary 10 3 $64,574.00

Rogers, Jillian Special Assistant to the Secretary Office of the Secretary 13 3 $101,116.00

Sherk, James Special Assistant to the Secretary Office of the Secretary 15 2 $136,160.00

Smith, Gavin Special Assistant to the Secretary Office of the Secretary 11 7 $79,810.00

Tiso, Daniel Special Assistant to the Secretary Office of the Secretary 7 1 $44,941.00

Zelden, Mark Special Assistant to the Secretary Office of the Secretary 15 10 $161,900.00

As of 3/20/2017

Non-Career SES

Non-Career SES

Non-Career SES

Non-Career SES
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00517-CR

Frederick O'Neal Scott

v.

The State of Texas

On appeal from the

24th District Court of DeWitt County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 14-05-12,033

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 21, 2016
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50611 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. CORNELIO HEREDIA-GARCIA, also known as Jesus Herrejon-Garcia Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-2219-ALL Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Cornelio Heredia-Garcia raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), whic h held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. U nited States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 5, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-50611

2 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

KENNETH LYDELL JACKSON

,

Appellant
,

v. Case No. 5D 17

- 3990

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. ________________________________/

Opinion filed June 1, 2018
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County

, Edward L. Scott , Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Brittany N. O'Neil, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Lydell Jackson appeals the partial denial of his motion to correct sentence

filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Jackson, who was sixteen years
old at the time of his offenses, entered open pleas to burglary of a conveyance while
armed (count I), attempted robbery with a firearm (count II), and possession of a firearm2

by a delinquent (count III). H e was sentenced to concurrent twenty

- five year terms of

prison on counts I and II . On count III, he received a concurrent fifteen

- year prison
sentence. In his rule 3.800(a) motion, Jackson argued that he was entitled to a full

resentencing hearing and a judicial review of his sentence. The tria l court granted

Jackson’s motion

, in part, amending the sentencing documents to allow for a juvenile

sentence review hearing, but denying a new resentencing hearing.

T his Court has previously held that it is error to modify a juvenile defendant’s

sentence to allow for a review hearing without also holding a resentencing hearing under

sections 775.082, 921.1401 and 921.1402, Florida Statutes. Ruiz v. State , 43 Fla. L.
Weekly D1015 (Fla. 5th DCA May 11, 2018); Katwaroo v. State , 237 So. 3d 446 (Fla. 5th

DCA 2018) ; Davis v. State , 230 So. 3d 487 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) . Jackson’s situation is
identical. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order amending the sentencing

documents to provide for a review hearing, but reverse and remand to allow the court to

c onduct a full resentencing hearing.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED

ORFINGER and TORPY

, JJ., concur. BERGER, J., concurring specially

.3

BERGER, J., concurring specially

. 5 D17

- 3990

I concur based on this C ourt’s decision s in Ruiz v. State , 43 Fla. L. Weekly D1015
(Fla. 5th DCA May 4 , 2018), Katwaroo v. State , 237 So. 3d 446 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018), and

Davis v. State

, 230 So. 3d 487, 488 (Fla. 5 th DCA 2017 ). However, were I writing on a

clean slate, I would affir m. In my view, Jackson is not entitled to resentencing under

Graham v. Florida , 560 U.S. 48 (2010)

, or Miller v. Alabama , 567 U.S. 460 (2012),

because his sentence s are not de facto life sentence s

. See , e.g. , Davis v. State , 214 So.

3d 799, 799

- 800 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).
Exhibit
32.1
 
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
 Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BSD Medical Corporation (the
“Company”) for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harold
R. Wolcott, President (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 
 Date:      
 November 6, 2009
 
 By:           /s/ Harold R.
Wolcott
 Harold R. Wolcott
 President
 (Principal Executive
Officer)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of Ameriprise Certificate Company (the “Company”) for the quarterly periodended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), William F. Truscott, as Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company and Ross P. Palacios, as Principal and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)            The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Date:  November  5, 2010 | By     | /s/  William F. Truscott |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                               |   | William  F. Truscott     |
|                               |   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|                               |   |                     |
|                               |   |                     |
| Date:  November  5, 2010 | By     | /s/  Ross P. Palacios    |
|                               |   | Ross  P. Palacios        |
|                               |   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 213 (Friday, November 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 67201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22063]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION


Fee Rates

AGENCY: National Indian Gaming Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to 25 CFR 514.1(a)(3), that 
the National Indian Gaming Commission has adopted final annual fee 
rates of 0.00% for tier 1 and 0.053% (.00053) for tier 2 for calendar 
year 2005. These rates shall apply to all assessable gross revenues 
from each gaming operation under the jurisdiction of the Commission. If 
a tribe has a certificate of self-regulation under 25 CFR part 518, the 
final fee rate on class II revenues for calendar year 2005 shall be 
one-half of the annual fee rate, which is 0.0265% (.000265)

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bobby Gordon, National Indian Gaming 
Commission, 1441 L Street, NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005; 
telephone 202/632-7003; fax 202/632-7066 (these are not toll-free 
numbers), or send Emails to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#460023233506080f010568012930"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="db9dbebea89b95929c98f59cb4ad">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act established 
the National Indian Gaming Commission which is charged with, among 
other things, regulating gaming on Indians lands.
    The regulations of the Commission (25 CFR part 514), as amended, 
provide for a system of fee assessment and payment that is self-
administered by gaming operations. Pursuant to those regulations, the 
Commission is required to adopt and communicate assessment rates; the 
gaming operations are required to apply those rates to their revenues, 
compute the fees to be paid, report the revenues, and remit the fees to 
the Commission on a quarterly basis.
    The regulations of the Commission and the final rate being adopted 
today are effective for calendar year 2005. Therefore, all gaming 
operations within the jurisdiction of the Commission are required to 
self-administer the provisions of these regulations and report and pay 
any fees that are due to the Commission by December 31, 2005.

Irene Schrader,
Director of Administration, National Indian Gaming Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-22063 Filed 11-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>