alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              THIS   SCHEDULE    CONTAINS   SUMMARY    FINANCIAL
                              INFORMATION    EXTRACTED   FROM   THE   INTER-TEL,
                              INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                              FOR  THE  YEAR  ENDED  DECEMBER  31,  1996  AND IS
                              QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
                              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                               38936
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        33094
<ALLOWANCES>                                          3096
<INVENTORY>                                          21280
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    105465
<PP&E>                                               26632
<DEPRECIATION>                                       15443
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      132611
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                25756
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             59875
<OTHER-SE>                                           35059
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        132611
<SALES>                                             185884
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    185884
<CGS>                                               104966
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       104966      
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      77
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      15306
<INCOME-TAX>                                          6264
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   9042
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0    
<NET-INCOME>                                          9042
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .68
                                                      

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

Officer’s Certification Pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 

(18 U.S.C 1350) 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pioneer Drilling Company, a Texas corporation, (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Wm. Stacy Locke, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge: 

(1)    The Report is in full compliance with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated:February 17, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>

This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
September  30,  1998  Financial   Statements   included  in  Interstate   Energy
Corporation's  Form 10-Q and is  qualified  in its entirety by reference to such
Financial Statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000352541
<NAME>                        INTERSTATE ENERGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      3,068,953
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    887,626
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         330,705
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       101,663
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 321,181
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,710,128
<COMMON>                                       771
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      889,469
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            654,736   <F1>
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 1,544,976
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          24,363
<PREFERRED>                                    89,102
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           1,485,607
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             74
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      56,975
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 54,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  68,764
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    15,745
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               13,211
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 1,357,311
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  4,710,128
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      1,602,608
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           53,889    <F2>
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     1,373,904
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     1,373,904 <F2>
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        228,704
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (3,265)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 225,439
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       95,045
<NET-INCOME>                                   76,505
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    5,024
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  71,481
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       117,556
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      91,926
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         376,820
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.93
<FN>
<F1>  Includes $103,982 of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.

<F2>  Income  tax  expense  is  not  included  in  Operating  Expense  in the
      Consolidated Statements of Income.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the January 12, 1996 
Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our report, dated February 10, 1998, on 
the consolidated financial statements of Richey Electronics, Inc. as of 
December 31, 1996 and 1997 and for each of the three years in the period 
ended December 31, 1997, which appears on page 23 of Form 10-K of Richey 
Electronics, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1997.

                                               McGladrey & Pullen, LLP




Pasadena, California
March 25, 1998
#### ANN ROBERTS, Appellant, v. FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation, Respondent.

No. 7563

March 28, 1975

533 P.2d 158

*Foley Brothers*and *Patrick J. Fitzgibbons, Jr.,*of Las Vegas, for Appellant.

*Austin, Thorndal & Liles,*and *Virgil R. Gentner,*of Las Vegas, for Respondent;

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

In this action to recover damages for injuries sustained in an automobile collision, the plaintiff, Ann Roberts, joined Farmers Insurance Company as a party defendant along with Henry Bozajian, the driver of the adverse vehicle who was insured by Farmers. The propriety of such joinder was presented to the district court by Farmers’ motion to dismiss. That court ruled that the insurance company was not a proper party defendant *200and expressly determined that there was no just reason to delay entry of final judgment in its favor. Rule 54(b). This appeal followed.

1. Relying upon the Florida decision of Shingleton v. Bussey, 223 So.2d 713 (Fla. 1969), the appellant claims to be a third-party creditor beneficiary of the insurance policy issued by Farmers to Bozajian and thus entitled to maintain a direct action against the insurer.

In this particular case the insurer has represented that it is not defending under a reservation of rights and will pay any judgment entered against its insured according to the terms of its policy. Although the insurance policy is not contained in the scanty record before us, we note that the plaintiff-appellant has alleged only that Farmers issued a policy of liability insurance to Bozajian and agreed to “pay all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages.” Thus, it appears from the face of the complaint that the plaintiff’s right against Farmers will not mature until she first has recovered a judgment against the insured Bozajian.

In these circumstances we need not decide whether the appellant is a third-party beneficiary of the insurance contract since it is apparent that there exists no breach, actual or anticipatory, of the insurer’s contractual obligations.

2. It is true that our permissive joinder rule, NRCP 20(a), does allow one to join as defendants those against whom is asserted any right to relief arising out of the same transaction and if any question of law or fact common to all defendants will arise in the action. That rule, however, does not embrace this case since a final judgment against the insured is a precondition to the plaintiff’s right to relief against Farmers. Allen v. Pomroy, 277 A.2d 727 (Me. 1971).

3. We perceive no merit to other arguments tendered by the appellant and dismiss them out-of-hand.

Affirmed.

Gunderson, C. J., and Batjer, Zenoff, and Mowbray, JJ., concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00386-CV

Arturo Rene ANAYA,

Appellant

v.

Juliana CASTILLO,

Appellee

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CVG-00820-D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of 

appeal are assessed against appellant.

SIGNED August 6, 2014.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 21

- 00162

- CV

Jordan GUNTER , Appellant

v. CARROLL & HINOJOSA PLLC , Appellee
From the 285th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018

- CI

- 07466 Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: August 18, 2021
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION On June 3, 2021, we ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court within t en days of the date of the order that he had requested the reporter’s record and that he had paid the reporter’s fee or was entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. We further ordered that, if appellant failed to respond to our order, his bri ef would be due within thirty days of the date of the order and we would consider only those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c). By July 12, 2021, appellant had not responded to our order and ha d not filed a brief. We, therefore, ordered appellant to file his brief04

- 21

- 00162

- CV

- 2

- and to show cause in writing by July 27, 2021, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution

. Se e id. R

. 38.8(a); see als o id. R. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if an appellant fails to comply with a court order)

. Appellant did not respond to this court’s order , and, to date, appellant has not filed a brief . Because appellant failed to timely file a brief in this appeal, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 38.8(a), 42.3(b)

. PER CURIAM
#### MORTGAGE CORP. v. COBLE, SEC. OF REVENUE

No. 106 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 243.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 December 1976.
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


COMPANY                                                         INCORPORATION
-------------------------------------                           -------------
Angis Safety Holdings, Inc.                                     Delaware
American Down & Textile Company                                 Wisconsin
Brawn of California, Inc.                                       California
Company Store Holdings, Inc.                                    Delaware
Gump's By Mail, Inc.                                            Delaware
Gump's Corp.                                                    California
Hanover Direct Pennsylvania, Inc.                               Pennsylvania
Hanover Direct Virginia, Inc.                                   Delaware
LWI Holdings, Inc.                                              Delaware
Scandia Down Corporation                                        Delaware
Tweeds, Inc.                                                    Delaware
Gumps Holdings, Inc.                                            Delaware
D.M. Advertising, Inc.                                          New Jersey
Hanover Realty, Inc.                                            Virginia
The Company Store, Inc.                                         Wisconsin
The Company Factory, Inc.                                       Wisconsin
The Company Office, Inc.                                        Wisconsin
Austad Holdings, Inc.                                           Delaware
The Austad Company                                              South Dakota
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

LIST OF ALL DIRECT AND INDIRECT SUBSIDIARIES

 
| 1.     |   | PDC MGMT. CO. (formerly SOTEX Exploration Company), a Texas  corporation—100% Direct Subsidiary—1% general partner of Pioneer Drilling  Services, Ltd.                                          |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| 2.     |   | PDC Investment Corp., A Delaware corporation—100% Direct  Subsidiary—99% limited partner of Pioneer Drilling Services, Ltd.                                                                     |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| 3.     |   | Pioneer Drilling Services, Ltd. (formerly Pioneer Drilling Co.,  Ltd.), a Texas limited Partnership—100% Indirect Subsidiary—owned  by PDC MGMT. CO. (1%) and PDC Investment  Corp. (99%). |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| 4.     |   | South Texas Drilling Company, a Texas corporation—100% Direct  Subsidiary.                                                                                                                           |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| 5.     |   | South Texas Offshore Drilling Company, a Texas corporation—100%  Direct Subsidiary.                                                                                                                  |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| 6.     |   | ST/1200, Inc., a Texas corporation—100% Direct Subsidiary.                                                                                                                                           |

 

----
**Exhibit12**

 

 

INTERNATIONAL MULTIFOODS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(unaudited)

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 
|                                                     |   | **THREE  MONTHS ENDED** |   | **SIX MONTHS  ENDED** |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------|--------|
|                                                     |   | **Aug. 31,  2002**      |   | **Sept. 1,  2001**    |   | **Aug. 31,  2002** |   | **Sept. 1,  2001** |   |
| Earnings from  continuing operations before income taxes |   | $                       | 7,020  |                  | $      | 2,838 |   | $ | 12,353 |   | $ | 4,013 |   |
| Plus: Fixed  charges(1)                                  |   | 11,315                  |   | 6,696                 |   | 22,800 |   | 13,332 |   |
| Less:  Capitalized interest                              |   | (125                    | )      | (100                  | )      | (190 | ) | (254 | ) |
| Earnings  available to cover fixed charges               |   | $                       | 18,210 |                  | $      | 9,434 |   | $ | 34,963 |   | $ | 17,091 |   |
|                                                     |   |                    |   |                  |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio of  earnings to fixed charges                      |   | 1.61                    |   | 1.41                  |   | 1.53 |   | 1.28 |   |

 

 

(1)Fixed charges consisted of the following:
|                       |   | **THREE  MONTHS ENDED** |   | **SIX MONTHS  ENDED** |   |
|----------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------|--------|
|                       |   | **Aug. 31,  2002**      |   | **Sept. 1,  2001**    |   | **Aug. 31,  2002** |   | **Sept. 1,  2001** |   |
| Interest  expense, gross   |   | $                       | 8,980  |                  | $      | 4,131 |   | $ | 18,079 |   | $ | 8,290 |   |
| Rentals  (Interest factor) |   | 2,335                   |   | 2,565                 |   | 4,721 |   | 5,042 |   |
| Total fixed  charges       |   | $                       | 11,315 |                  | $      | 6,696 |   | $ | 22,800 |   | $ | 13,332 |   |

 

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 216 (Wednesday, November 9, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 68046]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22051]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Change in Date of Open Commission Meeting to 
Monday, October 31, 2005

October 28, 2005.
    The Federal Communications Commission previously announced on 
October 21, 2005, its intention to hold an Open Meeting on Friday, 
October 28, 2005, in Room TW-C305, at 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, 
DC.
    The date has been changed to Monday, October 31, 2005, commencing 
at 11 a.m.
    The prompt and orderly conduct of Commission business required this 
change and no earlier announcement was possible.
    Additional information concerning this meeting may be obtained from 
Audrey Spivack or David Fiske, Office of Media Relations, (202) 418-
0500; TTY 1-888-835-5322.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-22051 Filed 11-1-05; 1:53 pm]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### RICHARD SUMNER McKINNON, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 11949

November 3, 1980

618 P.2d 1222

*Greenman & Goldberg,*of Las Vegas, for Appellant.

*Robert J. Miller,*District Attorney, and *James N. Tufteland,*Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

1

The Governor designated the Honorable Llewellyn A. Young, Judge of the Sixth Judicial District Court, to sit in the place of The Honorable Gordon Thompson, Justice.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

McKinnon was charged with having committed the crime of attempted murder. He was convicted of the crime of resisting a public officer while using a dangerous weapon. The issue on appeal is whether the crime of resisting a public officer is a lesser included offense of the crime of attempted murder.

Statute declares that a defendant may be found guilty of an offense necessarily included within the offense charged. NRS 175.501. On the other hand, if the offense for which the defendant is found guilty is not necessarily included within the *822offense charged, the conviction is void and must be set aside. State v. Carter, 79 Nev. 146, 379 P.2d 945 (1963).

The crime of attempted murder is an attempt to unlawfully kill a human being with malice aforethought, either express or implied. NRS 208.070; NRS 200.010. The crime of resisting a public officer is complete when one willfully resists, delays or obstructs a public officer in discharging or attempting to discharge any legal duty of this office. NRS 199.280.

If the offense charged cannot be committed without necessarily committing another offense, the latter is a necessarily included offense. Lovell v. State, 92 Nev. 128, 546 P.2d 1301 (1976); Holland v. State, 82 Nev. 191, 414 P.2d 590 (1966); Lisby v. State, 82 Nev. 183, 414 P.2d 592 (1966). One need only read the mentioned statutes to know that a murder may be attempted without committing the offense of resisting a public officer. Consequently, we annul the conviction of McKinnon for the crime of resisting a public officer since it is not an offense necessarily included within the charge of attempted murder.

Reversed.

Mowbray, C. J., and Gunderson, Manoukian, and Bat-jer, JJ., and Young, D. J.,1 concur.
#### JAMES CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 10499

February 7, 1978

574 P.2d 282

*Bell, Leavitt & Green, Chtd.,*Las Vegas, for Appellant.

*Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *George E. Holt,*District Attorney, and *L. J. O’Neale,*Deputy District Attorney, Clark .County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

An indictment charged James Cunningham with the felonious sale of cocaine, a controlled substance (NRS 453.321 and NRS 453.171). A pretrial petition for a writ of habeas corpus contended there was insufficient evidence to establish probable *66cause to believe Cunningham committed the charged offense. Habeas was denied and the same contention is reasserted in this appeal.

The transcript of the grand jury proceedings reflects that the only evidence relating to Cunningham was given by an undercover police officer. The officer testified that on September 26, 1977, when he arrived at the residence where he ultimately negotiated a purchase of cocaine from another person, a stranger departed the residence. The stranger, who at a later date was identified as Cunningham, allegedly made the statement: “Your timing is just about perfect. I just dropped the stuff off.”

While it is conceivable that the recited facts might establish probable cause that Cunningham committed some transgression of the law, they are “insufficient to establish probable cause that [he] made a ‘sale’ ” of cocaine. Egan v. Sheriff, 88 Nev. 611, 614, 503 P.2d 16, 18 (1972).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand this case to the district court with instructions to grant the petition for the writ of habeas corpus.