alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 21, 2011

d1114 

# Order

November 21, 2011

143132(18)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143132 COA: 302578 Oakland CC: 2008-223885-FH; 2010-231090-FH JAMES LAMAR HUDSON, a/k/a JAMES LEMAR HUDSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s September 6, 2011 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of River Rock Entertainment Authority (the Authority) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Yuan Fang (Yvonne) Mao, Chief Financial Officer of the Authority, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|(1)                     | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |                                                                                                                                                                  
|(2)                     | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    result of operations of the Authority.
|                        |                                                                                                                                                                  
|                        |                                                                                                                                                                  
|By:                     | /s/ Yuan Fang (Yvonne) Mao                                                                                                                                       
|Yuan Fang (Yvonne) Mao 
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 14, 2005      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the River Rock Entertainment Authority and will be retained by the River Rock Entertainment Authority and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 209 (Monday, October 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 62329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21711]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-05-037]


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice; Notice of Revised Agenda Item

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: November 2, 2005 at 2 p.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS:  Open to the public.

REVISED AGENDA ITEM:
    4. Inv. Nos. 751-TA-28-29 (Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp and 
Prawns from India and Thailand)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is 
currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' 
opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before November 21, 2005.)

    Issued: October 26, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-21711 Filed 10-27-05; 11:42 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5545 

To deauthorize a portion of the project for navigation, Potomac River, Washington Channel, District of Columbia, under the jurisdiction of the Corps 

of Engineers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2010 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To deauthorize a portion of the project for navigation, Potomac River, Washington Channel, District of Columbia, 

under the jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROJECT FOR NAVIGATION, WASHINGTON 

4 CHANNEL, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. 

5 Upon the date of enactment of this Act, the following 

6 portion of the project for navigation, Potomac River, 

7 Washington Channel, District of Columbia, authorized by 

8 the Act of August 30, 1935 (chapter 831; 49 Stat. 1028) 

9 is deauthorized: Beginning at Washington Harbor ChanVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:35 Jun 17, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5545.IH H5545

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5545 IH

1 nel Geometry Centerline of the 400-foot-wide main naviga2 tional ship channel, Centerline Station No. 103+73.12, 

3 coordinates North 441948.20, East 1303969.30, as stated 

4 and depicted on the Condition Survey Anacostia, Virginia, 

5 Washington and Magazine Bar Shoal Channels, Wash6 ington, D.C., Sheet 6 of 6, prepared by the United States 

7 Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore district, July 2007; 

8 thence departing the aforementioned centerline traveling 

9 the following courses and distances: N. 40 degrees 10 min10 utes 45 seconds E., 200.00 feet to a point, on the outline 

11 of said 400-foot-wide channel thence binding on said out12 line the following three courses and distances: S. 49 de13 grees 49 minutes 15 seconds E., 1,507.86 feet to a point, 

14 thence; S. 29 degrees 44 minutes 42 seconds E., 2,083.17 

15 feet to a point, thence; S. 11 degrees 27 minutes 04 sec16 onds E., 363.00 feet to a point, thence; S. 78 degrees 32 

17 minutes 56 seconds W., 200.00 feet to a point binding 

18 on the centerline of the 400-foot-wide main navigational 

19 channel at computed Centerline Station No. 65+54.31, 

20 coordinates North 438923.9874, East 1306159.9738, 

21 thence; continuing with the aforementioned centerline the 

22 following courses and distances: N. 11 degrees 27 minutes 

23 04 seconds W., 330.80 feet to a point, Centerline Station 

24 No. 68+85.10, thence; N. 29 degrees 44 minutes 42 sec25 onds W., 2,015.56 feet to a point, Centerline Station No. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5545 IH

1 89+00.67, thence; N. 49 degrees 49 minutes 15 seconds 

2 W., 1,472.26 feet to the point of beginning, such area in 

3 total containing a computed area of 777,284 square feet 

4 or 17.84399 acres of riparian water way. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

A.J., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

VA MEDICAL CENTER, Battle Creek, MI,

Employer

_________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 22-0581

Issued: April 29, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Alan J. Shapiro, Esq., for the appellant1

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On March 10, 2022 appellant, through counsel, filed a timely appeal from a purported 

March 8, 2022 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk 

of the Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 22-0581.

In a letter dated and received April 7, 2022, counsel requested that the appeal be 

dismissed.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that counsel’s request f or the 

dismissal of the appeal should be granted. Accordingly, 

1

In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no cla im f or a f ee f or 

legal or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 

20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board.

Id. An attorney or representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, 

subject to fine or imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of

fees to a representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation.
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the dismissal of the appeal 

is granted. The appeal docketed as No. 22-0581 is dismissed.

Issued: April 29, 2022

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
**Exhibit 10.38**
GUARANTEE
          Sears Roebuck Acceptance Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),has issued commercial paper notes pursuant to the Company’s Section 3(a)(3)commercial paper program (the “CP Program”) and (all such notes collectivelyreferred to as the “Notes”).
          Sears, Roebuck and Co., a New York corporation (“Sears”), herebyirrevocably and unconditionally guarantees, to each holder of a Noteoutstanding on the date hereof or any Note thereafter issued by the Companyunder the CP Program, that (a) the principal of (and premium, if any) andinterest on the Notes will be paid in full when due, and (b) in case of anyextension of time in payment or renewal of any Notes or pursuant to any cureperiod provisions of the Notes or the CP Program, they will be paid in fullwhen due in accordance with the terms of the extension, renewal or cure period(this “Guarantee”). Failing payment when due of any amount so guaranteed,Sears will be obligated to pay the same. In the event of a default in thepayment of principal, interest or premium (if any) any holder of Notes may seekto enforce the guarantee against Sears without first proceeding against theCompany.
          No stockholder, officer, director or incorporator, as such, past, presentor future of Sears shall have any liability under this Guarantee by reason ofhis, her or its status as such stockholder, officer, director or incorporator.
          This Guarantee shall be applicable to all Notes outstanding on the datehereof and any Note issued under the CP Program, after the date of thisGuarantee, whether or not a notation of this Guarantee is endorsed on any Note.This is a continuing guarantee and shall remain in full force and effect andshall be binding upon Sears and its successors and assigns until full and finalpayment of all of principal, interest and premium (if any) under the Notes andshall inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the holders of theNotes and, in the event of any transfer or assignment of rights by any holderof a Note, the rights and privileges herein conferred upon that party shallautomatically extend to and be vested in such transferee or assignee, allsubject to the terms and conditions hereof. This is a guarantee of payment,not of collectibility.
          Sears hereby confirms that it is its intention that this Guarantee notconstitute a fraudulent transfer or conveyance for purposes of any Federalbankruptcy law, the Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act, the Uniform FraudulentTransfer Act or any similar Federal, state or foreign law to the extentapplicable to this Guarantee (the “Applicable Laws”). In the event that thisGuarantee would constitute or result in a violation of any Applicable Law, theliability of Sears under this Guarantee shall be reduced to the maximum amountpermissible under such Applicable Law.
 

 

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Sears, Roebuck and Co. has caused this Guarantee to beexecuted by its duly authorized representative.
Dated:
November 3, 2003
      SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.   By:/s/Glenn R. Richter  Name:Glenn R. Richter Title:Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                             Revised FDS for 1995
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           319379
<NAME>                          PSC Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                          0

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                      1
<CASH>                           5,538
<SECURITIES>                     4,204
<RECEIVABLES>                   15,897
<ALLOWANCES>                       387
<INVENTORY>                     10,440
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                36,702
<PP&E>                          22,157
<DEPRECIATION>                   4,112
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  71,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           16,305
<BONDS>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                           100
<OTHER-SE>                      53,227
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    71,237
<SALES>                         87,516
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                87,516
<CGS>                           50,634
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   28,863
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  (388)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  8,695
<INCOME-TAX>                     3,246
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              5,449
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                     5,449
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                     0.54



</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael OROZCO-NINFERT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-51175.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided April 20, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Rafael Orozco-Ninfert raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
#### KILBY v. DOWDLE

No. 70 PC.

Case below: 4 N.C. App. 450.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 23 June 1969.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Designation of Performance Review Board Chair.

# SUMMARY:

This notice provides the Performance Review Board Chair designee for the Department of Energy: James T. Campbell.

# DATES:

This appointment is effective as of September 30, 2005.

Issued in Washington, DC October 24, 2005.

Claudia A. Cross,

Chief Human Capital Officer/Director, Office of Human Capital Management.

[FR Doc. 05-22119 Filed 11-4-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5545 

AN ACT 

To deauthorize a portion of the project for navigation, Potomac River, Washington Channel, District of Columbia, 

under the jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5545 EH

1 SECTION 1. PROJECT FOR NAVIGATION, WASHINGTON 

2 CHANNEL, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. 

3 Upon the date of enactment of this Act, the following 

4 portion of the project for navigation, Potomac River, 

5 Washington Channel, District of Columbia, authorized by 

6 the Act of August 30, 1935 (chapter 831; 49 Stat. 1028) 

7 is deauthorized: Beginning at Washington Harbor Chan8 nel Geometry Centerline of the 400-foot-wide main naviga9 tional ship channel, Centerline Station No. 103+73.12, 

10 coordinates North 441948.20, East 1303969.30, as stated 

11 and depicted on the Condition Survey Anacostia, Virginia, 

12 Washington and Magazine Bar Shoal Channels, Wash13 ington, D.C., Sheet 6 of 6, prepared by the United States 

14 Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore district, July 2007; 

15 thence departing the aforementioned centerline traveling 

16 the following courses and distances: N. 40 degrees 10 min17 utes 45 seconds E., 200.00 feet to a point, on the outline 

18 of said 400-foot-wide channel thence binding on said out19 line the following three courses and distances: S. 49 de20 grees 49 minutes 15 seconds E., 1,507.86 feet to a point, 

21 thence; S. 29 degrees 44 minutes 42 seconds E., 2,083.17 

22 feet to a point, thence; S. 11 degrees 27 minutes 04 sec23 onds E., 363.00 feet to a point, thence; S. 78 degrees 32 

24 minutes 56 seconds W., 200.00 feet to a point binding 

25 on the centerline of the 400-foot-wide main navigational 

26 channel at computed Centerline Station No. 65+54.31, 
3 

•HR 5545 EH

1 coordinates North 438923.9874, East 1306159.9738, 

2 thence; continuing with the aforementioned centerline the 

3 following courses and distances: N. 11 degrees 27 minutes 

4 04 seconds W., 330.80 feet to a point, Centerline Station 

5 No. 68+85.10, thence; N. 29 degrees 44 minutes 42 sec6 onds W., 2,015.56 feet to a point, Centerline Station No. 

7 89+00.67, thence; N. 49 degrees 49 minutes 15 seconds 

8 W., 1,472.26 feet to the point of beginning, such area in 

9 total containing a computed area of 777,284 square feet 

10 or 17.84399 acres of riparian water way. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 20, 2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5545 

AN ACT 

To deauthorize a portion of the project for navigaCorps of Engineers. trict of Columbia, under the jurisdiction of the tion, Potomac River, Washington Channel, Dis-
#### JAMES STEVENSON and LORETTA STEVENSON, Appellants, v. KOLLSMAN MINERAL & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Respondent.

No. 7504

August 26, 1975

539 P.2d 463

*Lionel Sawyer Collins & Wariman,*Las Vegas, for Appellants.

*Cromer, Barker & Michaelson,*Las Vegas, for Respondents.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Appellant contracted mercury poisoning while employed at respondent’s mercury mine and mill. This action for damages followed. Upon respondent’s motion, the district court granted summary judgment, stating that no genuine issue fact remained and that respondent was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. This appeal followed.

Initially appellant raised certain issues concerning the applicability of the Occupational Diseases Act to his case. See: NRS Chap. 617. We deem these issues without merit in light of appellant’s subsequent acceptance of a permanent disability award from tire Nevada Industrial Commission (NIC).

At oral argument, both parties were given permission to file supplemental briefs pertaining to acceptance of the NIC award. *530Attached to appellant’s brief is. a certified copy of proceedings before the commission on April 25, 1974. The findings of fact reflect that appellant requested and was granted permanent total disability status. Acceptance of the commission’s award extinguishes any common law right appellant might have had. As this court long ago stated:

“At the present time not only has an award been made by the commission but that award has now been accepted by the plaintiff below. In so doing the plaintiff has accepted the industrial compensation so awarded in lieu of any common law rights she might have had. This amounts to accord and satisfaction of such common law rights and has accomplished a destruction of any right of action, merging it by accord with the compensation award she has accepted in its place.” First Nat’l Bk. v. Dist. Ct., 75 Nev. 77, 82, 335 P.2d 79, 82 (1959).

Affirmed.
**CERTIFICATION      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | • | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter                ended                June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission                (the                “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | • | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----