alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5532 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5532

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2010

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act with respect to adopted 
                            alien children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``International Adoption Harmonization 
Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF ADOPTION AGE REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 101(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1101(b)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (E)--
                    (A) by striking ``(E)(i)'' and inserting ``(E)'';
                    (B) by striking ``sixteen'' and inserting 
                ``eighteen'';
                    (C) by striking ``; or'' and inserting a semicolon; 
                and
                    (D) by striking clause (ii);
            (2) in subparagraph (F)--
                    (A) by striking ``(F)(i)'' and inserting ``(F)'';
                    (B) by striking ``sixteen'' and inserting 
                ``eighteen'';
                    (C) by striking ``Attorney General'' and inserting 
                ``Secretary of Homeland Security''; and
                    (D) by striking clause (ii); and
            (3) in subparagraph (G)--
                    (A) by striking ``sixteen'' and inserting 
                ``eighteen''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Attorney General'' each place 
                such term appears and inserting ``Secretary of Homeland 
                Security''.

SEC. 3. HARMONIZING ADOPTIONS BETWEEN HAGUE CONVENTION AND NON-HAGUE-
              CONVENTION COUNTRIES.

    Section 212(a)(1)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1182(a)(1)(C)(ii)) is amended by striking ``section 
101(b)(1)(F),'' and inserting ``subparagraph (F) or (G) of section 
101(b)(1),''.

SEC. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH PAYGO.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the House of 
Representatives, provided that such statement has been submitted prior 
to the vote on passage.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 20, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 12**

 

INTERNATIONAL MULTIFOODS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(unaudited)

 

(in thousands)

 

 
|                                                     |   | **THREE MONTHS ENDED** |   | **NINE MONTHS ENDED** |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|--------|-----------------------|--------|
|                                                     |   | **Nov. 29,  2003**     |   | **Nov. 30,  2002**    |   | **Nov. 29,  2003** |   | **Nov. 30,  2002** |   |
| Earnings from continuing operations  before income taxes |   | $                      | 20,979 |                  | $      | 20,652 |   | $ | 21,231 |   | $ | 33,005 |   |
| Plus: Fixed charges(1)                                   |   | 5,866                  |   | 7,213                 |   | 19,271 |   | 30,013 |   |
| Less: Capitalized interest                               |   | (80                    | )      | (177                  | )      | (216 | ) | (367 | ) |
| Earnings available to cover fixed charges                |   | $                      | 26,765 |                  | $      | 27,688 |   | $ | 40,286 |   | $ | 62,651 |   |
|                                                     |   |                   |   |                  |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                       |   | 4.56                   |   | 3.84                  |   | 2.09 |   | 2.09 |   |

 

----

(1)  Fixedcharges consisted of the following:

 
|                      |   | **THREE MONTHS ENDED** |   | **NINE MONTHS ENDED** |   |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------|--------|-----------------------|--------|
|                      |   | **Nov. 29,  2003**     |   | **Nov. 30,  2002**    |   | **Nov. 29,  2003** |   | **Nov. 30,  2002** |   |
| Interest expense, gross   |   | $                      | 5,400  |                  | $      | 6,630 |   | $ | 17,953 |   | $ | 24,709 |   |
| Rentals (Interest factor) |   | 466                    |   | 583                   |   | 1,318 |   | 5,304 |   |
| Total fixed charges       |   | $                      | 5,866  |                  | $      | 7,213 |   | $ | 19,271 |   | $ | 30,013 |   |

 

----
#### Clifton E. CAMPBELL v. Jack Terrance ROACH, et al.

Civ. No. JFM-88-3236.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

Jan. 24, 1990.

*567Clifton E. Campbell, Silver Springs, Md., for plaintiff.

Lawrence White, Office of the Attorney General, Educational Affairs Div., Baltimore, Md., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

MOTZ, District Judge.

Plaintiff instituted this suit under the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act (“VEVRAA”), 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 2021-24 (West 1979 & Supp.1989). He has moved that this Court enter an order permitting him to proceed on appeal without prepayment of costs and directing the Court to remit the filing fee which he paid when he filed the action.

38 U.S.C.A. § 2022 provides that “no fees or court costs shall be taxed against any person who may apply for ... benefits” under the VEVRAA. It may be that this provision applies only to costs taxed in the district court. At least one court has held that (in a case in which each side had prevailed on one of the issues presented on appeal) that the parties should each pay their own costs on appeal. *See Lang v. Great Falls School District No. I and A,*842 F.2d 1046, 1052 (9th Cir.1988).1 Nevertheless, I am satisfied that the no-taxation-of-costs provision of § 2022 is intended to apply to all court proceedings. If the Fourth Circuit disagrees with this conclusion, it may order plaintiff to pay his costs when the case comes before it on appeal.

A separate order is being entered herewith effecting the ruling made in this memorandum.

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the memorandum entered herein, it is, this 24th day of January 1990

ORDERED

1. Plaintiff is ■ authorized to proceed without prepayment of costs on appeal (until any contrary order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit); and

2. The Clerk is directed to remit to plaintiff the filing fee which he paid when instituting this action.

1

. Plaintiff cites *Larsen v. Air California,*76 LRRM 2526 (9th Cir.1970) in support of his position. *Larsen,*however, was based upon the Military Selective Service Act, 50 U.S.C.A.App. §§ 451-462 (West 1971 & Supp.1989), not the VEVRAA.
# L_2007267EN.01001001.xml

| 12.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 267/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 267/10

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1193/2007

of 11 October 2007

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 900/2007

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 of 27 July 2007 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2007/2008 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 of 27 July 2007 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2007/2008 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 11 October 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 11 October 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 11 October 2007, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 900/2007 shall be 37,715 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 12 October 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 October 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 247/2007 (OJ L 69, 9.3.2007, p. 3).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 196, 28.7.2007, p. 26.

2

---
Exhibit 23.1

Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.

PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS



|                                |  |                                |  |                          
|------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ |  | -------------------------
|AUSTIN OFFICE:                  |  | MAIN OFFICE:                   |  | HOUSTON OFFICE:          
|9601 AMBERGLEN BLVD., SUITE 117 |  | 306 WEST 7TH STREET, SUITE 302 |  | 1000 LOUISIANA, SUITE 625
|AUSTIN, TEXAS 78729             |  | FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102-4987   |  | HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5008
|(512) 249-7000                  |  | (817) 336-2461                 |  | (713) 651-9944           
|FAX (512) 233-2618              |  | FAX (817) 877-3728             |  | FAX (713) 651-9980       

CONSENT OF CAWLEY, GILLESPIE &
ASSOCIATES, INC.

February 16, 2015

Permian Basin Royalty Trust

Southwest Bank, Trustee

2911 Turtle Creek Boulevard, Suite 850

Dallas, Texas 75219

Gentlemen:

Cawley, Gillespie &
Associates, Inc., hereby consents to the use of the oil and gas reserve information in the Permian Basin Royalty Trust Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2014
and in the Permian Basin Royalty Trust Annual Report for the year ending December 31, 2014, based on reserve reports dated February 16, 2015, prepared by Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.



Submitted,Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-693LOGOKenneth J. Mueller, P. E. 86132Vice President
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00473-CV

Katrina J. (“Nina”) Morris, Appellant

v.

Maansi Piparia, M.D.; April Schiemenz, M.D.; and 

Christina Sebestyen, M.D., P.A. d/b/a ObGyn North, Appellees

FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-GN-17-000374, THE HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Katrina J. (“Nina”) Morris, seeking to invoke our jurisdiction to review an 

interlocutory order, has filed an unopposed petition for permissive appeal under Subsection 

51.014(f) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code.1 Accompanying Morris’s petition is 

an order from the trial court that satisfies Subsection (d). The trial court’s order identifies two 

controlling questions of law as to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion 

1

 See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.014(f) (“An appellate court may accept an 

appeal permitted by Subsection (d) if the appealing party, not later than the 15th day after the 

date the trial court signs the order to be appealed, files in the court of appeals having appellate 

jurisdiction over the action an application for interlocutory appeal explaining why an appeal is 

warranted under Subsection (d).”); see also id. § 51.014(d) (“[A] trial court in a civil action may, 

by written order, permit an appeal from an order that is not otherwise appealable if: (1) the order 

to be appealed involves a controlling question of law as to which there is a substantial ground for 

difference of opinion; and (2) an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the 

ultimate termination of the litigation.”); Tex. R. App. P. 28.3 (implementing rule).
2

and finds that an immediate appeal of the controlling questions of law identified in the order 

would materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. 

Code § 51.014(d).

We conclude that the appeal is warranted, and we accept it. See id. § 51.014(f). 

The appeal will proceed under the rules governing accelerated appeals, and notice of appeal is 

deemed to have been filed as of the date of this order. See id.; Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(k).

It is ordered on September 3, 2020.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Kelly
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1995
<CASH>                                          46,125
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,748
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (10,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    531,981
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               716,745
<PP&E>                                         997,742
<DEPRECIATION>                               (732,384)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,184,837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          967,328
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       161,770
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,184,837
<SALES>                                      1,148,656
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,148,656
<CGS>                                          646,733
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,455,784
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,284
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,493
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (196,879)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (196,879)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (196,879)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 213 (Friday, November 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 67180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22000]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Cancer Institute Director's Consumer Liaison Group.
    The meetings will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Director's Consumer 
Liaison Group.
    Date: December 1, 2005.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: 1. NCI Listens and Learns Web Site; 2. Update on Summit 
planning; 3. Update from OLA; 4. Public Comment; 5. Next Steps.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call)
    Contact Person: Brooke Hamilton, Executive Secretary, Office of 
Liaison Activities, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer 
Institute, 6116 Executive Blvd., Suite 220, MSC 8324, Bethesda, MD 
20891, 301-435-3855, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f199909c989d859383b19c90989ddf9f9899df969e87"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4d252c202421392f3f0d202c242163232425632a223b">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/dclg/dclg.htm, where an agenda 
and any additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 28, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-22000 Filed 11-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

H.S., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, 

Melville, NY, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 22-0224

Issued: January 27, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On November 29, 2021 appellant filed a timely appeal from a November 15, 2021 merit 

decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate 

Boards assigned Docket No. 22-0224.

In a letter dated January 13, 2022, appellant requested that the appeal be dismissed.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that appellant’s request for the 

dismissal of the appeal should be granted. Accordingly, 
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the dismissal of the appeal is 

granted. The appeal docketed as No. 22-0224 is dismissed.

Issued: January 27, 2022

Washington, DC

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

T.E., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, NEW YORK 

INTERNATIONAL SERVICE CENTER, JOHN 

F. KENNEDY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, 

Jamaica, NY, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-1183

Issued: November 30, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On September 21, 2023 appellant filed a timely appeal from a September 11, 2023 merit 

decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the 

Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 23-1183.

In a letter dated and received October 26, 2023, appellant requested that the appeal be 

withdrawn.

1

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that appellant’s request for the 

withdrawal of the appeal should be granted. Accordingly, 

1 The Board’s decisions and orders are final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance. 

20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d).
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the withdrawal of the appeal 

is granted. The appeal docketed as No. 23-1183 is dismissed.

Issued: November 30, 2023

Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
EXHIBIT 4.1
​
DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES
REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
​
As of December 31, 2021, 22nd Century Group, Inc. (“we” or “our”) had one class of securities, our common stock, par value $0.00001 per share (“Common Stock”), registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The following description of our Common Stock is a summary and is subject to, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the provisions of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and our Amended and Restated Bylaws, copies of which are incorporated by reference as Exhibits 3.1, 3.1.1, 3.2 and 3.2.1, respectively, to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 of which this Exhibit 4.1 is a part.
​
Our authorized capital stock consists of 300,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $0.00001 par value per share, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.00001 par value per share. As of December 31, 2021, 162,872,875 shares of Common Stock were issued and outstanding and no shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding.
​
Our Common Stock is traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “XXII.” Holders of our Common Stock are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders and do not have cumulative voting rights. Holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared by the board of directors out of funds legally available therefore, subject to a preferential dividend right of outstanding preferred stock. Upon the liquidation, dissolution or our winding up, the holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive ratably our net assets available after the payment of all debts and other liabilities and subject to the prior rights of any outstanding preferred stock. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of our Common Stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected by the rights of the holders any series of preferred stock that we may designate and issue in the future.