alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5565 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5565

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 5014 Gary Avenue in Lubbock, Texas, as the ``Sergeant Chris Davis 
                             Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 2010

Mr. Neugebauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 5014 Gary Avenue in Lubbock, Texas, as the ``Sergeant Chris Davis 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 5014 
Gary Avenue in Lubbock, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 
``Sergeant Chris Davis Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant Chris Davis Post 
Office''.
                                 <all>
```
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00069-CR

JEFFREY DWAYNE BLANKENSHIP,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 271st District 

Court

of Jack County (4839)

November 30, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice 

Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT ON REMAND

This appeal is on remand from the Court of Criminal Appeals.

This court has again considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the 

trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
EXHIBIT 23.2


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the incorporation
by  reference  of  our  report  dated   January  12,  1998  included  in  Aurora
Electronics,  Inc.  Form 10-K for the year ended  September  30, 1997,  into the
previously filed registration statement (No. 333-60027 and No. 333-87643 and No.
333-87643)  on  Form  S-8  of  the  Cerplex  Group  (formerly  known  as  Aurora
Electronics, Inc.).


                                                      ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Orange County, California
January 7, 2000
Exhibit 23.01
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (No.333-83383 and 333-85741) of our reportsdated February 9, 2000, except as to Note 10 whichis as of March 28, 2000, relating to the financial statements ofMarketWatch.com, Inc., and June 15, 1998, relating to the financial statementsof the DBC Online/News Business, a division of Data Broadcasting Corporation,which appear in MarketWatch.com, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 1999.  

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPSan Jose, CaliforniaMarch 30, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 212 (Thursday, November 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 66821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21919]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Defense Department Advisory Committee on Women in 
the Services (DACOWITS)

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a), Public Law 92-463, as amended, 
notice is hereby given of a forthcoming meeting of the Defense 
Department Advisory Committee on Women in the Services (DACOWITS). The 
purpose of the Committee meeting is to discuss the 2005 DACOWITS 
Report. The meeting is open to the public, subject to the availability 
of space.
    Interested persons may submit a written statement for consideration 
by the Committee and make an oral presentation of such. Persons 
desiring to make an oral presentation or submit a written statement to 
the Committee must notify the point of contact listed below no later 
than 5 p.m., 31 October 2005. Oral presentations by members of the 
public will be permitted only on Monday, 7 November 2005 from 4:45 p.m. 
to 5 p.m. before the full Committee. Presentations will be limited to 
two minutes. Number of oral presentations to be made will depend on the 
number of requests received from members of the public. Each person 
desiring to make an oral presentation must provide the point of contact 
listed below with one (1) copy of the presentation by 5 p.m., 31 
October 2005 and bring 35 copies of any material that is intended for 
distribution at the meeting. Persons submitting written statement must 
submit 35 copies of the statement to the DACOWIS staff by 5 p.m. on 31 
October 2005.

DATES: 7 November 2005, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m., 8 November 2005, 8:30 a.m.-5 
p.m.
    Location: Embassy Suite Crystal City National Airport, 1300 
Jefferson Davis Hwy, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MAJ Kimberly Venable, USA DACOWITS, 
4000 Defense Pentagon, Room 2C548A, Washington, DC 20301-4000. 
Telephone (703) 697-2122. Fax (703) 614-6233.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Meeting agenda.

Monday, 7 November 2005 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.

    Welcome and Administrative Remarks
    Review and Vote on 2005 DACOWITS Report Recommendations
    Public Forum

Tuesday, 8 November 2005 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.

    Welcome and Administrative Remarks
    Review and Vote on 2005 DACOWITS Report Recommendations


    Note: Exact order may vary.


    Dated: October 28, 2005.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. 05-21919 Filed 11-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     The undersigned, Thomas C. Shull, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Hanover Direct, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 28, 2002 of the Company
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company for the period specified.

     Signed at the City of Edgewater, in the State of New Jersey, this 25th day
of March, 2003.
                                                 /s/ Thomas C. Shull
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                     Thomas C. Shull
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.23
​
AMENDMENT TO PATENT AND TECHNOLOGY LICENSE AND PURCHASE OPTION AGREEMENT
​
THIS AGREEMENT (the “Amended Agreement”), dated March 26, 2019, amends the Patent and Technology License and Purchase Option Agreement (the “License Agreement”) entered into on October 29, 2015 by and between (i) Q BioMed Inc. (“Q Bio”) and (ii) Mannin Research Inc. (“Mannin”) (together, the “Parties”).
​
W I T N E S S E T H:
​
WHEREAS, all capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in the License Agreement; and
​
WHEREAS, as each of the Parties agree that the amendment to the License Agreement contained in this Agreement is in its best interest;
​
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and mutual promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows:
​
TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT
​
1.Section 2.3 shall be amended by deleting the last sentence therein and replace it with the following:
​
“If not exercised prior pursuant to this Agreement, this exclusive option will expire on October 29, 2021.
​
In exchange for the extended option period, Q Bio shall issue 100,000 shares of its common stock to Mannin within ten (10) days of the execution of the first amendment of this Agreement.”
​
2.The Parties agree that the shares referenced in Section 1 hereto shall be issued by April 5th 2019.
​
​



3.The Parties agree that this Agreement does not affect any other provision of the License Agreement.
​
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amended Agreement to the License Agreement as of date first written above.
​
​
	​
	Q BIOMED INC.

	​
	​

	​
	​

	​
	By:
	​

	​
	​
	Name:
	DENIS CORIN

	​
	​
	Title:
	CEO

	​
	​

	​
	MANNIN RESEARCH INC. INC.

	​
	​

	​
	​

	​
	By:
	​

	​
	​
	Name:
	​

	​
	​
	Title:
	​



​
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

________________ _____________
No. 1D18-3360

________________ _____________
D AVID P HILLIPS , a/k/a G ARY R EED , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

________________ _____________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. Brantley S. Clark, Jr., Judge.

July 9, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R OWE , and M AKAR , JJ., concur.

________________ _____________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fl a. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

________________ _____________2 David Phillips, a/k/a Gary Reed, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney Genera l, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### Samuel Oakman *vs.*Alvan Rogers & others.

Suffolk.

March 28.

April 5, 1876.

Colt & Lobd, JJ., absent.

A. offered by letter to “ help out ” B. at a certain price with a kind of article of which A had a full supply. B. promptly accepted the offer by letter, and named the quantity he would like, together with the manner of delivery. A. replied to B. by letter, on the same day, that by his offer he merely meant to substitute B. in his place in an offer made to him. *Held,*in an action by B. against A. on an alleged agreement of sale, that these letters did not show such an agreement, nor constitute a sufficient memorandum to take the case out of the statute of frauds.

Contract for breach of an agreement to sell fruit jars to the plaintiff. The answer contained a general denial, and set up the statute of frauds. At the trial in the Superior Court, before *Rockwell,*J„ the plaintiff put in evidence, to support the alleged agreement, the following letters, all dated July 2,1874:

“ To Samuel Oakman, Esq.: Will you please send by bearer 6 blank letter heads on which we can write copies of your letter of yesterday, to enable our travelling men to bull the price a little on porcelain and glass top jars. We now have full supply of both, and if any of your customers can’t get enough, we will help you out at $16 qt. and $20 2 qt. Rogers & Co.”

“ Messrs. Rogers & Co.: Yours of this date received. I a» eept your kind offer for porcelain and glass top fruit jars at *215$16 qt. and $20 half gals. Please book me for 500 gross porcelain lined jars, say three hundred gross qts., two hundred gross half gals. Make deliveries, one hundred gross per week, commencing next week any time after fifth inst. I am very glad to be helped out of my dilemma. Samuel Oakman.”

“ To Samuel Oakman, Esq.: Our offer to you was based on & telegram from Consolidated Fruit Jar Co., and you can use this line for authority to take the offer in our place and so simplify the transaction, as we are willing to relinquish any benefit there may be in the trade, having, since writing you, concluded to accept a still better offer for another jar. Rogers & Co.”

Upon this evidence, by the consent of parties, before verdict, the case was reported for the determination of this court upon the questions whether the letters created any contract between the parties, and whether the letters were a sufficient note or memorandum in writing of the contract within the statute of frauds. If the court were of opinion that the plaintiff could maintain his action, the case was to stand for trial; otherwise judgment for the defendants.

*S.*<7. Barling, for the plaintiff.

*B. 0. Linscott,*for the defendants.

By the Court.

The letters relied on do not show that the parties ever agreed on the number of jars, the time or manner of delivery, or the other terms of the alleged contract of sale, and are not a sufficient memorandum to take the case out of the statute of frauds. *Judgment for the defendants.*
1517 WEST FRONT STREET SUITE 354 TYLER, TX 75702 TEL: 903-593-8471 FAX: 903-593-2193

Serving Anderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith, Trinity, Upshur, Van 

Zandt and Wood Counties

www.12thcoa.courts.state.tx.us

CHIEF JUSTICE

JAMES T. WORTHEN

JUSTICES

BRIAN HOYLE

GREG NEELEY

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

CLERK

CATHY S. LUSK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

MARGARET HUSSEY

March 16, 2015

Ms. Lois Rogers

District Clerk, Smith County

Courthouse, Suite 204

100 North Broadway Avenue

Tyler, TX 75702-7201

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 12-13-00387-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 241-1175-13

Style: Wilber Medina

v.

The State of Texas

Pursuant to Rule 18.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, enclosed herewith is the 

Mandate issued in the above cause. When the District or County Clerk has executed the 

Mandate in accordance with the opinion of this Court, the Clerk is requested to fill in the 

information below and to return the attached copy to this office.

Very truly yours,

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:_____________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

C

C

:

Mr. Austin R. Jackson (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Michael J. West (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Wilber Medina

Mandate executed on __17th_ day of ___<MARCH____________, 2015.

Brief explanation of action taken: __________SCANNED________________________________

LINDA RHYMESerk

FILE COPY

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 3/17/2015 7:13:22 AM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to 

revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

-1-

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

UNPUBLISHED

September 3, 2020

v No. 330612

Oakland Circuit Court

ALEX JAY ADAMOWICZ, LC No. 2014-251162-FC

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: STEPHENS, P.J., and K. F. KELLY and MURRAY, JJ.

STEPHENS, P.J. (concurring).

I concur in the result only.

/s/ Cynthia Diane Stephens
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 213 (Friday, November 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 67178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21974]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 2004N-0516]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; 2005 Food Safety Survey; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration is correcting a notice that 
appeared in the Federal Register of October 24, 2005 (70 FR 61455). The 
document announced an approval by the Office of Management and Budget. 
The document was published with an incorrect expiration date for OMB 
control number 0910-0345. This document corrects that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Robbins, Office of Management 
Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 05-21157, appearing on page 61455 
in the Federal Register of Monday, October 24, 2005, the following 
correction is made:
    1. On page 61455, in the second column, in the SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION section, beginning on line 13, the sentence ``The approval 
expires on February 30, 2008.'' is corrected to read ``The approval 
expires on February 29, 2008.''

    Dated: October 28, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-21974 Filed 11-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Investment Properties Associates (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Irving  Schneider,  General Partner and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Irving Schneider
-----------------------------------------
Irving Schneider

General and Special Limited Partner and
Chief Executive Officer

November 13, 2002
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 22003D0060

**Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 60/2003 of 16 May 2003 amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement***Official Journal L 193 , 31/07/2003 P. 0046 - 0047*

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee

No 60/2003

of 16 May 2003

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement", and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Annex XXI to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 17/2003 of 31 January 2003(1).

(2) Regulation (EC) No 1991/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 October 2002 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 577/98 on the organisation of a labour force sample survey in the Community(2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall added in point 18a (Council Regulation (EC) No 577/98) of Annex XXI to the Agreement:

", as amended by:

- 32002 R 1991: Regulation (EC) No 1991/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 October 2002 (OJ L 308, 9.11.2002, p. 1)."

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EC) No 1991/2002 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 17 May 2003, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee(3).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 16 May 2003.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

P. Westerlund

(1) OJ L 94, 10.4.2003, p. 76.

(2) OJ L 308, 9.11.2002, p. 1.

(3) Constitutional requirements indicated.
exhibit1032_romeofirstam






Exhibit 10.32 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






Executive Vice President Nate Rexroth Sr. Vice President, Treasurer Michael Tortorici
[Cite as Zwick v. Ohio Dept. of Transp. , 2011-Ohio-1766.] 

# Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

MICHAEL JAMES ZWICK

Plaintiff

v.

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Defendant

Case No. 2010-10939-AD

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert

ENTRY OF DISMISSAL

{¶ 1} On September 29, 2010, plaintiff, Mich ael Zwick, filed a complaint against defendant, Department of Transportation. Plaintiff asserts on September 16, 2010 at approximately 12:30 p.m., while traveling northbound on State Route 128 underneath the I-275/I-74 overpass his vehicle struck a series of metal plates causing damage. Plaintiff seeks reimbursement for tire damage in the amount of $141.83. The filing fee was paid. {¶ 2} On November 22, 2010, defendant filed a motion to dismiss. In support of the motion to dismiss, defendant stated in pertinent part: {¶ 3} “Duke Energy was working in this area by permit to relocate two aerial lines into two buried flex ducts along SR 128 under I-74. They were working on a utility relocation project and ODOT’s permit was issued on September 2, 2010. The permit has language that states ‘ The permittee shall save harmless the State of Ohio and all of its representatives from all suits, actions, or claims of any character brought on accountCase No. 2010-10939-AD - 2 - ENTRY

of any injuries or damages sustained by an y person or property in consequence of any neglect or on account of any act or omission as a result of the issuance of this permit ’ (See Exhibit A). This permit mentions that Duke Energy was doing work associated with ODOT Project HAM-74-7.76 but this project will not be sold until November 18, 2010 and the utility company is doing the relocation work in advance of the construction project.” {¶ 4} Plaintiff has not responded to defendant’s motion to dismiss. {¶ 5} Defendant was not responsible for the work being performed at the site of plaintiff’s incident. Accordingly, defendant is not the appropriate party to sue. Therefore, defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED and the court shall absorb the court costs of this case in excess of the filing fee.

________________________________ DANIEL R. BORCHERT Deputy Clerk

Entry cc:

Michael James Zwick Chester T. Lyman, Jr. 8214 West Mill Street, Apt. 416 Department of Transportation Cleves, Ohio 45002 1980 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43223 DRB/laa Filed 1/21/11 Sent to S.C. reporter 4/8/11