alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: MARCELO BRITTO GOMEZ,

Debtor,

______________________________

CARTER STEPHENS,

Appellant,

v.

MARCELO BRITTO GOMEZ ; UNITED STATES TRUSTEE,

Appellees. No. 14

- 60027

BAP No. 13

- 1282

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Taylor , Pappas, and Kurtz , Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted October 25, 2016 **

Before: LEAVY, SILVERMAN, and GRABER , Circuit Judges.

Carter Stephens appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel ’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 4 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 60027

( “ BAP ” ) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying reconsideration

of its order dismissing for failure to prosecute Stephen s ’s adversary proceeding.

We have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d) . We review de novo decisions of

the BAP

. Boyajian v. New Falls Corp. (In re Boyajian) , 564 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th

Cir. 2009). W e vacate and remand

.

A motions panel of t he BAP limited the scope of Stephens’s appeal to the

bank ruptcy court’s order denying Stephens’s motion for reconsideration. The

panel applied the fourteen

- day time limit to file a notice of appeal found in Federal

Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8002( a ), and observed that Stephens’s motion for

reconsideration was not filed within fourteen days and, therefore, did not toll the

time limit to file a notice of appeal as to the underlying order of dismissal

, see Fed.

R. Bankr. P. 8002(b)

. The BAP erred in limiting the scope of Stephens’s appeal.

See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7058. Because Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 applies in

adversary proceedings, Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7058, and because the bankruptcy court

did not enter a separate judgment in the case, Stephens had 150 days from the entry

of the order in the bankruptcy court’s docket. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(c). Stephens

timely filed his motion for reconsideration from the February 8, 2012 order

dismissing the adversary proceeding, Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 (e) , and timely appealed3 14

- 60027

from both the dismissal order and from the or der denying reconsideration. No

tolling was required.

Because the BAP did not reach the issue of whether the bankruptcy court

properly dismissed Stephens’s adversary proceeding for failure to prosecute , we

remand to the BAP to consider the issue in the first instance

.

All pending motions are denied.

Each party shall bear its own costs in this appeal

.

VACATED and REMANDED

.
#### STATE v. MITCHELL

No. 42 PC.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 431.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 April 1973.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 4, 2005, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq*. (“the Act”), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (“IEEE”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, 23 new standards have been initiated and 9 existing standards are being revised. More detail regarding these changes can be found at                     *http://standards.ieee.org/​standardswire/​sba/​09-22-05.html*.                

                    On September 17, 2004, IEEE filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 8, 2005. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 28, 2005 (70 FR 56736).                

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 05-21888 Filed 11-2-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Exhibit - 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

Solely for the purposes of
complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Jilco Industries, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the quarter ended October 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 29, 2006



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                           
|/s/ Martha Kretzmer                                        
|Martha Kretzmer                                            
|Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 209 (Monday, October 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 62303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21603]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


2006 National Capital Arts and Cultural Affairs Program

    Notice is hereby given that Public Law 99-190, as amended, 
authorizing the National Capital Arts and Cultural Affairs Program, has 
been funded for 2006 in the amount of $7,215,490.00. All requests for 
information and applications for grants should be received by 31 
December 2005 and addressed to: Frederick J. Lindstrom, Assistant 
Secretary/NCACA Program Administrator, Commission of Fine Arts, 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, 401 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20001-2728. Phone: 202-504-2200.
    Deadline for receipt of grant applications is 1 March 2006.
    This program provides grants for general operating support of 
organizations whose primary purpose is performing, exhibiting, and/or 
presenting the arts. To be eligible for a grant, organizations must be 
located in the District of Columbia, must be non-profit, non-academic 
institutions of demonstrated national repute, and must have annual 
incomes, exclusive of federal funds, in excess of one million dollars 
for each of the past three years. Organizations seeking grants must 
provide a Dun and Bradstreet (D&S) Data Universal Numbering System 
(DUNNS) number when applying.

Frederick J. Lindstrom,
Assistant Secretary and NCACA Program Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05-21603 Filed 10-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,569
<SECURITIES>                                    45,371
<RECEIVABLES>                                  250,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,748
<INVENTORY>                                    230,259
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               451,971
<PP&E>                                         268,542
<DEPRECIATION>                                 145,168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 765,850
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          319,053
<BONDS>                                        259,229
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        85,769
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,789
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   765,850
<SALES>                                      3,067,395
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,067,395
<CGS>                                        2,735,011
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,039,490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,880
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,401)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,035)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,366)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,366)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit 

No. 21-40229 

Summary Calendar 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Jared Ulises Villarreal-De La Fuente, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:20-CR-1048-1 

Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges. 

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jared Ulises 

Villarreal-De La Fuente has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief 

in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United 

States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Villarreal-De La Fuente has 

*

 Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

December 10, 2021 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 21-40229 Document: 00516125020 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/10/2021
No. 21-40229 

2 

filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions 

of the record reflected therein, as well as Villarreal-De La Fuente’s response. 

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for 

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. 

R. 42.2. 

Case: 21-40229 Document: 00516125020 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/10/2021
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-10410

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANTANESHIA LENISE WOODSON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CR-167-2

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Antaneshia Lenise Woodson has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Woodson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 21, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-10410 Document: 00512539938 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2014
No. 13-10410

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-10410 Document: 00512539938 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2014
ex_344638.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment No. 2 to First Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement (this “Amendment No. 2”) is entered into as of March 4, 2022, by and between ThermoGenesis Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation formerly known as Cesca Therapeutics Inc. (the “Borrower”), and Boyalife Asset Holding II, Inc., an Illinois corporation (“Lender”). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Restated Credit Agreement (as defined below).


 


WHEREAS, the Borrower and Lender previously entered into a First Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated April 16, 2018, as amended pursuant to that certain Amendment No. 1 to First Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement dated May 7, 2018 (as heretofore amended, the “Restated Credit Agreement”), setting forth the terms and conditions of a revolving credit facility extended by Lender to Borrower (the “Credit Facility”);


 


WHEREAS, the Restated Credit Agreement amended and restated a Revolving Credit Agreement that was originally entered into by Borrower and Lender on March 6, 2017, as amended on September 13, 2017 (the “Credit Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Borrower and Lender desire to extend the term of the Restated Credit Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound, and in consideration of the mutual agreements contained herein, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.    Amendment to Exhibit 1. The “Termination Date” set forth on Exhibit 1 is hereby amended to be “March 6, 2023.”


 


2.    Remainder of Restated Credit Agreement. Except as expressly provided for in this Amendment No. 2, all of the terms, conditions and provisions of the Restated Credit Agreement remain unaltered, are in full force and effect, and are hereby expressly ratified and confirmed.


 


3.    Miscellaneous. This Amendment No. 2 may be executed in one or more counterparts, and by the different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when executed shall be deemed to be an original but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. The parties further agree that facsimile signatures or signatures scanned into .pdf (or similar) format and sent by e-mail shall be deemed original signatures.


 


[signatures follow]


 



 




 




 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 2 as of the day and year first written above.


 


 


THERMOGENESIS HOLDINGS, INC.


 


 


/s/ Jeffery Cauble                                     


 


 


 


 


 


 


BOYALIFE ASSET HOLDING II, INC.


 


 


/s/ Xiaochun Xu
#### Martin Wheeler *vs.*Peter Johnson.

May 1, 1875.

Defendant not Liable on Contract between Plaintiff and a Third Person. — The facts in this ease being that stone, to recover the price of which this action is brought, were delivered to defendant under an arrangement by which the same were to be delivered in exchange for an equal quantity of stone belonging to defendant, the arrangement to be carried out by plaintiff, and the defendant being in no wise responsible for the carrying out of the same, such action for the price cannot be maintained.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for St. Louis county, McKelvey, J., presiding, and from an order refusing a new trial.

*Setzer & Egan,*for appellant.

*J. D. Ensign,*for respondent.

Berry, J.

Plaintiff was engaged in transporting certain stone belonging to defendant, from defendant’s quarry to the mouth of the St. Louis river, and also at the same time *508engaged in transporting stone of the same quality, belonging to one Davidson, from Davidson’s quarry to the Duluth canal. At plaintiff’s request, and for his convenience, Davidson, for himself, on the one hand, allowed plaintiff to deliver a quantity of stone belonging to defendant at Duluth canal, as and in the place of stone belonging to said Davidson, and for his (Davidson’s) use and benefit, and defendant, for himself, on the other hand, allowed plaintiff to deliver an equal quantity of stone belonging to Davidson at the mouth of the St. Louis river, as and in the 'place of stone belonging to defendant, and for defendant’s use and benefit. Under this arrangement plaintiff delivered, at Duluth canal, fifty-one cords of defendant’s stone, and at the mouth of the St. Louis river, fifty-three cords of Davidson’s stone. The plaintiff brings this action to recover of defendant the sum of two hundred and twelve dollars, alleging that, upon Davidson’s demand therefor, he paid him that sum for the fifty-three cords of stone aforesaid, and that thereupon Davidson sold and assigned to him his (Davidson’s) claim against defendant on account of said stone.

It is evident that this action can be maintained only upon the theory that defendant was in some way liable to Davidson for the price of the stone. But the facts in the case negative this theory, because they show that the fifty-three cords of stone were delivered under an arrangement for an *exchange*of defendant’s stone for the same, an arrangement assented to by Davidson, and which was to be carried out by plaintiff, and for the carrying out of which defendant is in no way shown to have been responsible. Judgment reversed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5494 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5494

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer certain properties 
                      to the District of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of the Interior shall transfer to the District of 
Columbia by quitclaim deed all right, title, and interest of the United 
States to the following properties in the District of Columbia:
            (1) Square 336, Lot 828, as shown on Assessment and 
        Taxation Plat 3761-Y among the records of the Surveyor of the 
        District of Columbia (Shaw Junior High School recreation 
        fields).
            (2) Square 542, Lot 85, as referenced on page 104 of 
        Subdivision Book 141 and shown on Map 8634 among the records of 
        the Surveyor of the District of Columbia (Southwest Library).
            (3) Square 2864, Lot 830, as shown on Assessment and 
        Taxation Plat 3495-G among the records of the Surveyor of the 
        District of Columbia (Meyer Elementary School).
            (4) Reservation 277-A, as shown on page 4 of Subdivision 
        Book 134 among the records of the Surveyor of the District of 
        Columbia.
            (5) Square 2558, Lot 803, as shown on Assessment and 
        Taxation Plat 65 among the records of the Surveyor of the 
        District of Columbia (a portion of the Marie H. Reed Community 
        Learning Center).
            (6) Square 2558, Lot 810, as shown on Assessment and 
        Taxation Plat 65 among the records of the Surveyor of the 
        District of Columbia (a portion of the Marie H. Reed Community 
        Learning Center).

            Passed the House of Representatives September 22, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5494

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer certain properties 
                      to the District of Columbia.
```
[DESCRIPTION]    COVER PAGE
              U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                     Washington, D.C. 20549

                           FORM 10-QSB
(Mark One)

[ x ]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

        For the quarterly period ended September 30, 1998

[   ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the transition period from __________ to __________

                      Commission file number: 0-2664

                       INVESTORS FINANCE, INC.
   (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
                        ___________________

		Hawaii				   99-0112763
	(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
	incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

	50 South Beretania Street, Honolulu, Hawaii	96813
	(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

                 Issuer's telephone number: (808) 533-7437
___________________

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or 
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such 
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days.  Yes [   ] No[ x ]

Number of shares outstanding of the issuer's common stock as of
September 30, 1998: 1,549,698

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes [  ]  No [ x ]