alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008061EN.01000101.xml

| 6.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4839 — AREVA NP/MHI/ATMEA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 61/01)

On 29 October 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4839. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4839. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DAN BRINKLEY GODWIN

No. 7314SC196

(Filed 14 March 1973)

Criminal Law § 23— appeal from guilty plea

Defendant’s plea of guilty to felonious receiving was freely, understandingly and voluntarily made, and the acceptance of the plea will not be disturbed on appeal.

Appeal by defendant from *Tillery, Judge,*23 October 1972 Session of Superior Court held in Durham County.

By a three-count bill of indictment proper in form defendant was charged with (1) felonious breaking and entering, (2) felonious larceny, and (3) felonious receiving of certain particularly described chattels of the value of $740.00, well knowing said chattels to have been feloniously stolen. Represented by court-appointed counsel, defendant pled guilty to the charge contained in the third count. From judgment sentencing defendant to prison for a term of not less than three nor more than five years, with recommendation for work release, defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Robert Morgan by Assistant Attorney General James E. Magner, Jr. for the State.*

*Lina Lee S. Stout for defendant appellant.*

PARKER, Judge.

Before accepting the plea, the trial judge examined defendant and found his plea was freely, understandingly and volun*591tarily made. Defendant’s signed transcript of plea supports these findings. The acceptance of the plea will not be disturbed on this appeal. *State v. Roberts,*279 N.C. 500, 183 S.E. 2d 647; *State v. Witherspoon,*279 N.C. 490, 183 S.E. 2d 552. We have carefully examined the record and find

No error.

Judges Bkock and Morris concur.
#### YANCEY v. WATKINS

No. 445.

Case below: 2 N.C. App. 672.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 21 January 1969.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), I, William D. Hibbetts, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pioneer Drilling Company, a Texas corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:



|Dated: June 22, 2004 |  | /s/WILLIAM D. HIBBETTSWilliam D. Hibbetts
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

57

---



QuickLinks
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF
THE TRUSTEE*
OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as explained in Note 3
to the Trusts financial statements contained in the Trusts Annual Report to Unit
Holders for the year ended December 31, 2007, attached as Exhibit 13 to the Report, in
accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 47,
released September 16, 1982, the Trust prepares its financial statements in a manner
that differs from generally accepted accounting principles; such presentation is
customary to other royalty trusts); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
 COMPASS BANK, AS TRUSTEE OF THE
SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTBy:
    
    /s/ Lee Ann AndersonName:
    
    Lee Ann AndersonTitle:
    
    Vice President and Senior Trust OfficerDate: February 29, 2008
 
 *
    
    The Trust has no executive officers.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0 518 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MATTHEW GLEN HOTCHKISS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 29, 20 20 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening bri ef on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 19 2020

03/19/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0518
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

of Iris International, Inc. 

Chatsworth, California 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No’s. 333-27189, 333-37946, 333-86617, 333-48097,333-110826, 333-115393, 333-118577, 333-135442 and 333-147618) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-10631, 33-56772, 33-82560, 333-19265, 333-31391, 333-45348, 333-31393, 333-63304, 333-65547, 333-103462, 333-122501, 333-127952 333-137738, 333-145635 and333-159676) of IRIS International, Inc. of our reports dated March 15, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements, and the effectiveness of Iris International, Inc’s internal control over financial reporting, which appears inthis Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ BDO Seidman,LLP 

 

BDO Seidman, LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

 

March 15, 2010
J-S63026-19

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Appellee

 v.

KAREEM OLIVER,

 Appellant

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

 

 No. 3646 EDA 2018

Appeal from the PCRA Order Entered November 20, 2018

In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Criminal Division at

No(s): CP-51-CR-1003111-2004

BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J.E., MURRAY, J. and STRASSBURGER, J.*

DISSENTING MEMORANDUM BY STRASSBURGER, J.:FILED NOVEMBER 30, 2020

Because I would grant Appellant’s motion for an extension of time to 

respond to counsel’s Anders brief before reaching the merits of Appellant’s 

claims on appeal, I respectfully dissent. 

Briefly, after Appellant pro se filed the instant notice of appeal, the 

PCRA court granted counsel’s motion to withdraw. On appeal to this Court, 

Appellant pro se filed a brief. Because the PCRA court improperly permitted 

counsel to withdraw after a notice of appeal had been filed, this Court 

remanded for the PCRA court to appoint appellate counsel. The PCRA court 

complied. On September 30, new counsel filed a motion to withdraw with 

this Court and an Anders brief. Appellant had until October 30 to respond to 

the Anders brief. Although Appellant did not file a brief, on October 29, 

2020, he filed a motion for an extension of 60 days to respond because he 
J-S63026-19

- 2 -

had been unable to access the prison law library due to the COVID-19 

pandemic. 

Appellant was left without counsel when he initially filed this notice of 

appeal, and Appellant is again left without counsel and unable to respond 

meaningfully to counsel’s Anders brief. Appellant is currently serving a 

sentence of 30 to 60 years of incarceration. Thus, Appellant is not going 

anywhere and the Commonwealth would not be prejudiced by the granting 

of Appellant’s motion. 

Accordingly, I would grant Appellant’s motion for an extension of time 

to respond to counsel’s Anders brief, and defer addressing the merits of 

Appellant’s claims until after that time.
# L_2007155EN.01003301.xml

| 15.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 155/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 155/33

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 663/2007

of 14 June 2007

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 958/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 14 June 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 14 June 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 14 June 2007, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 shall be 38,778 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 June 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 June 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 247/2007 (OJ L 69, 9.3.2007, p. 3).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 49. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 203/2007 (OJ L 61, 28.2.2007, p. 3).

2

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463 as amended) notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Panel of the Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities will be held at 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, in Room 730, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., on Monday, November 14, 2005. 

The purpose of the meeting is to review applications for Certificates of Indemnity submitted to the Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities for exhibitions beginning after January 1, 2006. 

Because the proposed meeting will consider financial and commercial data and because it is important to keep values of objects, methods of transportation and security measures confidential, pursuant to the authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority to Close Advisory Committee Meetings, dated July 19, 1993, I have determined that the meeting would fall within exemption (4) of 5 U.S.C. 552(b) and that it is essential to close the meeting to protect the free exchange of views and to avoid interference with the operations of the Committee. 

It is suggested that those desiring more specific information contact Advisory Committee Management Officer, Michael McDonald, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, or call 202/606-8322.

Michael McDonald, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05-21944 Filed 11-2-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
#### John P. NAIDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ECOLAB, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-2422.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 28, 2005.

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.

Garfield Goodrum, Boston, Massachusetts (John P. Naiden, Arlington, Vermont, on the briefs), for Plaintiff-Appellant, pro se.

Tasos C. Paindiris, Jackson Lewis LLP, Hartford, Connecticut, for Defendants-Appellees.

Present: NEWMAN, WESLEY, and HALL, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

Familiarity by the parties is assumed as to the facts, the procedural context, and the specification of appellate issues. Appellant John Naiden filed a complaint against defendant, alleging age discrimination under both the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 623, and the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act, Conn. GemStat. § 46a-60, and, under Connecticut law, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and intentional or negligent physical injury. The district court granted summary judgment to defendant on all counts.

Naiden raises two arguments on appeal. First, he claims that the district court improperly dismissed his claims under the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act for failure to timely file his complaint. Second, Naiden argues that he made sufficient allegations to support his claims for the negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress. We find both of these arguments without merit and affirm for substantially the same reasons stated by Judge Covello.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 9, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-60296

Conference Calendar

 

HENRY C. PAYTON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, Commissioner; 

E. L. SPARKMAN, Superintendent; JOHN BEARRY, Dr., 

MSP Medical Director; LARRY HARDY, Legal Claims Adjudicator,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:03-CV-126

--------------------

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Henry C. Payton, Mississippi inmate # 65110, appeals the

dismissal of his civil rights complaint, filed pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. Payton has filed a Motion for a Preliminary

Injunction and/or in the alternative, for a Temporary Restraining

Order. Payton asks this court to enjoin the Mississippi

Department of Corrections from moving him to another prison unit

in retaliation for his filing the instant lawsuit. Payton’s
No. 03-60296

-2-

motion is DENIED. See Moye v. Clerk, DeKalb County Superior

Court, 474 F.2d 1275, 1275-76 (5th Cir. 1973). 

Payton argues that the district court erred when it

dismissed his complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Payton’s allegation that prison

officials were negligent for failing to place slip guards and

guard rails in the showers where he is housed fails to state a

claim because a claim for negligence does not establish an Eighth

Amendment violation. See Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320, 321

(5th Cir. 1991). Payton’s allegation that prison officials

failed to provide adequate medical treatment fails to state a

claim because mere dissatisfaction with medical treatment does

not rise to a constitutional violation. See id. Last, Payton’s

allegation that prison officials failed to comply with

Mississippi state law when they overcharged him for medical

treatment he received fails to state a claim inasmuch as a prison

official’s failure to follow state regulations does not establish

a constitutional violation. See Jackson v. Cain, 864 F.2d 1235,

1251-52 (5th Cir. 1989).

The district court’s dismissal of the present case and this

court’s affirmance of the dismissal count as one strike against

Payton for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v.

Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Payton is WARNED

that if he accumulates three strikes he will be barred

from proceeding in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal
No. 03-60296

-3-

filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless

he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

AFFIRMED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
#### METAL TREATING CORP. v. REALTY CO.

No. 81 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 620.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 December 1976.
# C_2008011EN.01000101.xml

| 16.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4944 — SAP/Business Objects)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 11/01)

On 27 November 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4944. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4944. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-05-037]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: 

United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE: 

November 2, 2005 at 2 p.m.

# PLACE: 

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS:

 Open to the public.

# REVISED AGENDA ITEM: 

4. Inv. Nos. 751-TA-28-29 (Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp and Prawns from India and Thailand)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before November 21, 2005.)

Issued: October 26, 2005.

Marilyn R. Abbott,

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 05-21711 Filed 10-27-05; 11:42 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P