alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6841

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. LISA MARIE CASEY, a/k/a Lisa Marie Adams, a/k/a Marie Galliher, a/k/a Lisa Marie Graninger , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Abingdon

. James P. Jones , District Judge. ( 1:06

- cr - 00071

- JPJ

- PMS

- 1 )

Submitted : October 21, 2019 Decided: November 6, 2019

Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Lisa Mari e Casey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lisa Marie Casey appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for relief and expedited decision. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court

. United States v. Casey , No. 1:06

- cr - 00071

- JPJ

- PMS

- 1 (W.D. Va. May 28, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional pr ocess. AFFIRMED
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

S.K., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, HARTFORD 

PROCESSING & DISTRIBUTION CENTER,

Hartford, CT, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 24-0053

Issued: November 30, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On October 13, 2023 appellant filed an appeal from a purported September 11, 2023

decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the 

Appellate Boards assigned the appeal Docket No. 24-0053.

The Board, having duly considered the matter, notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act.1 This jurisdiction encompasses any final adverse decision issued by OWCP within 180 

days of the date appellant filed the appeal.2 The case record as transmitted to the Board does not 

contain a final adverse decision of OWCP issued within 180 days from the date of docketing of 

the current appeal.3 As there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP over which the Board 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the 

date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.”

3

Id.
2

may properly exercise jurisdiction, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 24-0053 

must be dismissed.4 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 24-0053 is dismissed.

Issued: November 30, 2023

Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

4 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” 

20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d).
EXHIBIT 31.2



I, Richard L. Browdy, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



|      |                 |  |     |                                            | 
|----- | --------------- |  | --- | ------------------------------------------ | 
|Date: | August 14, 2007 |  | By: | /s/ RICHARDL. BROWDY                       | 
|      |                 |  |     | Richard L. Browdy, Chief Financial Officer |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 

# AGENCY:

National Ocean Service, NOAA, Department of Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting cancellation. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that the meeting of the Marine Protected Areas Federal Advisory Committee (MPAFAC), which was to be held November 1-3, 2005, in Corpus Christi, Texas is cancelled (                        **Federal Register**                        , v.70, No. 191, p. 57863-57864). Notice of the rescheduled date will be published in the                         **Federal Register**                         and posted on                         *http://www.mpa.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Lauren Wenzel, Designated Federal Officer, MPAFAC, National Marine Protected Areas Center, 1305 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20910. Phone: (Phone: 301-713-3100 x136, Fax: 301-713-3110); email:                         *lauren.wenzel@noaa.gov;*                         or visit the National MPA Center Web site at                         *http://www.mpa.gov*).                     

Dated: October 26, 2005. 

Eldon Hout, 

Director, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management. 

[FR Doc. 05-21816 Filed 11-1-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-08-P
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DE CEMBER 1, 2017

NO. 03

- 17

- 00572

- CV

E. W. and A. M. R., Appellant s

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, FI ELD, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the j udgment signed by the tr i a l court on August 8, 2017. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. Becaus e

appellant s are indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
#### STATE v. COLEY

No. 43 PC.

Case below: 17 N.C. App. 443.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 April 1973.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 205 (Tuesday, October 25, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 61696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21313]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Veterans' Advisory Committee on Environmental Hazards; Notice of 
Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the 
Veterans' Advisory Committee on Environmental Hazards will be held on 
Wednesday, November 30 and Thursday, December 1, 2005, from 8 a.m. to 5 
p.m. each day. The meeting will be held at the Hilton Tampa Airport 
Westshore, 2225 N. Lois Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33607. The meeting is 
open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary 
of Veterans Affairs on adverse health effects that may be associated 
with exposure to ionizing radiation and to make recommendations on 
proposed standards and guidelines regarding VA benefit claims based 
upon exposure to ionizing radiation.
    The major items on the agenda for both days will be discussions and 
analyses of medical and scientific papers concerning the health effects 
of exposure to ionizing radiation. On the basis of its analyses and 
discussions, the Committee may make recommendations to the Secretary 
concerning the relationship of certain diseases with exposure to 
ionizing radiation. On November 30, there will be a presentation by 
VA's Public Health and Environmental Hazards Office. The December 1 
session will include planning future Committee activities and 
assignment of tasks among the members.
    Those who wish to attend should contact Ms. Bernice Green of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs, Compensation and Pension Service, 810 
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, by phone at (202) 273-7210, 
or by fax at (202) 275-1728. Members of the public may submit written 
questions or prepared statements in advance for the Committees review. 
Statements should be sent to Ms. Green's attention at least 5 days 
prior to the meeting at the address show above. Those who submit 
material may be asked to clarify it prior to its consideration by the 
Committee.
    An open forum for verbal statements from the public will also be 
available for 20 minutes during the morning and 20 minutes in the 
afternoon each day. Each person who wishes to make a verbal statement 
before the Committee will be accommodated on a first-come, first-served 
basis and will be provided three (3) minutes to present a statement.

    Dated: October 19, 2005.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-21313 Filed 10-24-05; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
# L_2007031EN.01000301.xml

| 6.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 31/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 31/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 107/2007

of 5 February 2007

determining the extent to which applications for import rights lodged for the 2007 quota year for the import of live bovine animals of a weight exceeding 160 kg and originating in Switzerland, provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2172/2005, may be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2172/2005 of 23 December 2005 laying down detailed rules for the application of an import tariff quota for live bovine animals of a weight exceeding 160 kg and originating in Switzerland provided for in the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products (2), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2172/2005 sets the duty-free annual tariff quota for which Community importers may lodge an application for import rights in accordance with Article 3 of that Regulation at 4 600 head of cattle. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2172/2005 sets the duty-free annual tariff quota for which Community importers may lodge an application for import rights in accordance with Article 3 of that Regulation at 4 600 head of cattle.

| (2) | The quantities of import rights applied for are such that the applications may be accepted in full, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The quantities of import rights applied for are such that the applications may be accepted in full,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Each application for import rights lodged in accordance with Article 3(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2172/2005 for the quota period from 1 January to 31 December 2007 shall be accepted at a rate of 100 % of the import rights applied for.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 6 February 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 February 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 346, 29.12.2005, p. 10. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1869/2006 (OJ L 358, 16.12.2006, p. 49).

2

---
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 10(ss)
[WMS GAMING LOGO]



TO:      Kathleen McJohn

FROM:    Brian R. Gamache

DATE:    May 12, 2003

RE:      RELOCATION ASSISTANCE


     Kathleen:

     Pursuant to our conversation of May 9th, the Company has agreed to increase
     your relocation allowance from $10,000 to $50,000. This increase would
     contemplate a necessary reduction in the sale price of your home below the
     purchase price of $500,000. The Company feels it would be in its best
     interest to reduce your daily commute by accelerating your relocation to
     the general Waukegan area. The Company will reimburse you these funds upon
     receipt of proper documentation. Should you leave the employ of the Company
     for any reason that was not initiated by the Company for the period of one
     year after signing this agreement, the entire relocation assistance would
     be required to be repaid to the company.






      /s/ Brian R. Gamache                       /s/ Kathleen J. McJohn
     --------------------------------           --------------------------------
          Brian R. Gamache                          Kathleen McJohn








     cc:     Orrin J. Edidin
             Michael A. Komenda
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 10

- 00068

- CR

Corey J. DUKES , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 175th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2006

- CR

- 4699 Honorable Mary D. Rom á n , Judge Presiding Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 15 , 2010
AFFIRMED Appellant , Cory J. Dukes, pled no contest to the charge of possession of a controlled substance. Appellant’s sentence was suspended and he was placed on community supervision for two years. Later, the State moved to revoke appellant ’s community supervision. At a hearing on the motion to revoke, appellant pled “true” to violating a condition of his community supervision. On appeal, appellant’s court

- appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of t he record and demonstrating there are no arguable grounds to be04

- 10

- 00068

- CR

- 2

- advanced. Counsel concludes the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Appellant was informed of his right to review the

rec ord. Counsel provided appellant with a copy of the brief and advised him of his right to file a pro se brief. Appellant has not filed a brief. After reviewing the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Accordingly, we affirm t he trial court’s judgment, and we GRANT appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.).
Sandee Bryan Mari on, Justice
Do not publish
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

G.E., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, SOUTH SUBURBAN 

ILLINOIS PROCESSING & DISTRIBUTION 

CENTER, Bedford Park, IL, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0632

Issued: May 12, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On March 10, 2021 appellant filed an appeal from a September 8, 2020 nonmerit decision

of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 21-0632.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.1 

For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review 

authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s 

decision.2

The 180th day following the September 8, 2020 decision was March 7, 2021. As this fell 

on a Sunday, appellant had until Monday, March 8, 2021 to file the appeal.3 Appellant did not file 

an appeal with the Board until March 10, 2021, more than 180 days after the September 8, 2020

 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e).

3

Id. at § 501.3(f).
2

OWCP decision, therefore, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 21-0632 is untimely 

filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not offered a reason 

to explain the failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to establish 

compelling circumstances.

The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date 

of their issuance.”

4

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0632 is dismissed.

Issued: May 12, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

 

4

Id. at § 501.6(d).
# L_2007084DE.01004603.xml

| 24.3.2007 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 84/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2007

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 84/46

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 226/2007 der Kommission vom 1. März 2007 zur Zulassung von Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077 (Levucell SC20 und Levucell SC10 ME) als Futtermittelzusatzstoff

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 64 vom 2. März 2007
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 64 vom 2. März 2007

Auf Seite 28, in der Tabelle des Anhangs, Spalte 7 „Mindestgehalt“, Linie „Milchschafe“:

anstatt:

„3 × 109“

9

muss es heißen:

„1,2 × 109“.

9

---
Exhibit 10. (iii)(8)



NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS RETIREMENT PLAN



	Each director who is not an employee of the Company or its
subsidiaries ("non-employee director") who is a director on
November 8, 1995 will be eligible upon retirement from the Board
of Directors at the mandatory retirement age (or upon earlier
retirement with Board approval), to receive, while living, a
quarterly payment in advance of each quarter equal to
one-quarter of the "annual retainer fee" of $30,000 in effect on
November 8, 1995.  For purposes of this Plan, the annual
retainer fee shall exclude additional fees paid to a
non-employee director for acting as chairman of a committee. 
Payment(s) to eligible non-employee directors under this Plan
shall not begin  until retirement from the Board at the
mandatory retirement age set by the Board (or earlier upon Board
approval).  Persons who become directors of the Company
subsequent to November 8, 1995 will not be eligible for benefits
under this Plan.



	 The  Board of Directors and the Secretary may in their
discretion prescribe such provisions and interpretations as
either shall deem necessary or advisable for purposes of this
Plan.  At any time, the Board of Directors may amend, modify or
terminate this Plan, in whole or in part, and terminate benefits
to an otherwise eligible non-employee director who ceases to
serve as such because, in the opinion of the Board, of
misfeasance.



	Nothing in the Plan shall be deemed to create any obligation on
the part of the Board of Directors to nominate any non-employee
director for reelection by the Company's shareholders.  The Plan
does not create a trust in favor of a non-employee director or
any other person and the obligation of the Company is solely a
contractual obligation to make payments due hereunder.  In this
regard, benefits under the Plan shall be considered a liability
of the Company and a non-employee director's right thereto shall
be the same as any unsecured general creditor of the Company. 
No non-employee director shall acquire any right, title or
interest in or to any amounts payable to a non-employee director
under the Plan other than the actual payment of such amounts in
accordance with the terms of the Plan.



	No right or benefit under the Plan shall be subject to
anticipation, alienation, sale, assignment, pledge, encumbrance
or change, and any attempt to anticipate, alienate, sell,
assign, pledge, encumber or change the same shall be void.  No
right or benefit hereunder shall in any manner be liable for or
subject to the debts, contracts, liabilities or torts of the
person entitled to such benefit.



	Construction of the Plan shall be governed by the laws of
Illinois.