alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000053316
<NAME> JEFFERSON BANCORP, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                      11,966,120
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     319,860,702
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,200,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                147,465,371
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,248,541
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,261,000
<LOANS>                                    228,511,228
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,452,395
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             422,636,388
<DEPOSITS>                                 365,868,697
<SHORT-TERM>                                17,246,035
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          4,469,960
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,866,080
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,185,616
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             422,636,388
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             16,343,892
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            5,971,656
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               351,744
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            22,667,292
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           9,051,703
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,826,820
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       12,690,472
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  150,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             323,985
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             13,410,086
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,997,010
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,997,010
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,388,310
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.89
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,652,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   656,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                175,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,151,691
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                1,110,033
<RECOVERIES>                                   272,251
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,452,395
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,888,339
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        564,056
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 212 (Thursday, November 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 66840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21908]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panels (SEP): Epi-Centers for Prevention of Healthcare-
Associated Infections, Request for Application CI06-001

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting:

    Name: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control 
Special Emphasis Panel (SEP): Epi-Centers for Prevention of 
Healthcare-Associated Infections, Request for Application CI06-001.
    Times and Dates: 9 a.m.-4:30 p.m., December 9, 2005 (Closed).
    Place: Renaissance Concourse Hotel, One Hartsfield Centre 
Parkway, Atlanta, GA 30354, Telephone Number (404) 209-9999.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to Be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to: 
Epi-Centers for Prevention of Healthcare-Associated Infections, 
Request for Application CI06-001.
    Contact Person for more Information: Trudy Messmer, PhD, 
Scientific Review Administrator, National Center for Infectious 
Diseases, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop C-19, Atlanta, GA 
30333, Telephone Number (404) 639-3770.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: October 28, 2005.
Alvin Hall,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 05-21908 Filed 11-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```
Exhibit 10.2 

ALLIANT ENERGYCORPORATION 

RESTRICTED STOCKAGREEMENT

        **THISRESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT** (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of**[Date]** (the “Grant Date”), by and between Alliant Energy Corporation, aWisconsin corporation (the “Company”), and **[Name of Employee]**, a keyemployee of the Company (“Employee”). 

R E C I T A L S

        **WHEREAS**,the Company has in effect the Alliant Energy Corporation 2002 Equity Incentive Plan (the“Plan”), which provides for, among other things, the issuance of shares ofcommon stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Stock”), of the Company to a KeyEmployee (as defined in the Plan), at the discretion of the Compensation and PersonnelCommittee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Committee”); and 

        **WHEREAS**,the Committee has authorized the grant of shares of Stock to the Employee, subject to therestrictions provided herein; and 

        **WHEREAS**,the Company and the Employee desire to memorialize this grant of Stock made to theEmployee under the Plan. 

A G R E E M E N T

        **NOW,THEREFORE**, in consideration of the promises and of the covenants and agreements hereinset forth, the parties hereto mutually covenant and agree as follows:
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

P.F., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, MAIN POST OFFICE, 

Humble, TX, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0166

Issued: March 8, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On November 12, 2020 appellant filed an appeal from a May 8, 2020 merit decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of Appellate Boards docketed 

the appeal as Docket No. 21-0166. 

The Board, having duly considered the matter, notes that its jurisdiction is limited to the 

review of final adverse OWCP decisions issued under the Federal Employees’Compensation Act.1 

For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s authority 

is limited to appeals, which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s 

decision.2

The 180th day following the most recent OWCP decision, dated May 8, 2020, was 

November 4, 2020. As appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until November 12, 2020, 

more than 180 days after the May 8, 2020 decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as 

No. 21-0166 is untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant 

has not offered a reason to explain her failure to timely file an appeal with supporting 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e).
2

documentation sufficient to establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse 

decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the filing of this appeal over which the Board may 

properly exercise jurisdiction, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 21-0166 must 

be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0166 is dismissed. 

Issued: March 8, 2022

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” 20 

C.F.R. § 501.6(d).
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 14, 2007 | /s/                Fangde Zhang                                    |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | Fangde                ZhangChief                Executive Officer  |
|                                   |                                                               |
|                                   | /s/                Mingzhu Zhang                                   |
|                                   | Mingzhu                ZhangChief                Financial Officer |

----
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0628. DENNIS SANDERS v. THE STATE.

Dennis Sanders pled guilty to aggravated battery, cruelty to children in the first

degree, and battery, and the trial court entered his judgment of conviction on July 11,

2012. Sanders filed a pro se notice of appeal on August 15, 2012. We lack

jurisdiction.

 To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the

order on appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice

of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Rowland v.

State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Because Sanders filed his notice

of appeal 35 days after entry of the order he seeks to appeal, it is untimely. 

Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

 We note, however, that Sanders was represented by counsel before the trial

court and may be entitled to pursue an out-of-time appeal. He is therefore informed

of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State, supra at 875-876: This appeal

has been dismissed because you failed to file a timely notice of appeal. If you still

wish to appeal, you may petition the trial court for leave to file an out-of-time appeal. 

If the trial court grants your request, you will have 30 days from the entry of that

order to file a notice of appeal referencing your conviction. If the trial court denies

your request, you will have 30 days from the entry of that order to file a notice of

appeal referencing the denial of your request for an out-of-time appeal.

 The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to Sanders and to

Sanders’s attorney, and the latter is also directed to send a copy to Sanders.

January 20, 2016
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

01/20/2016
#### FRANK GROOMES and WHITTLESEA BLUE CAB COMPANY, a Nevada Corporation, Appellants, v. LOUIS FOX, Respondent.

No. 11587

May 22, 1980

611 P.2d 208

*458*Rose, Edwards, Hunt & Pearson, Ltd.,*of Las Vegas, for Appellants.

*Lehman & Nelson,*of Las Vegas, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

In this action to recover damages for injuries sustained in an automobile collision, the jury found for the defendants, Groomes and Whittlesea Blue Cab. The court granted a new trial since, in its view, there had occurred a manifest disregard by the jury of the instructions of the court. NRCP 59(a)(5).

The plaintiff below, Louis Fox, was a passenger for hire in the Whittlesea cab driven by Groomes. Before picking up Fox, Groomes noticed that his brakes were “mushy,” radioed that information to the dispatcher and was told to bring the cab in after his next fare. Mr. Fox and wife were the next passengers. While proceeding south on Las Vegas Boulevard towards the Sands Hotel, Groomes entered the left turn lane to enter the Sands when the car in front of him stopped suddenly. Groomes applied his brakes but cohid not stop.

Had the jury paid due regard to the instructions of the court, particularly the instruction concerning the duty of care owed by a common carrier to its passengers, it was not possible, in the view of the trial court, to return a defense verdict. Here, as in Price v. Sinnott, 85 Nev. 600, 460 P.2d 837 (1969), we believe it was well within the province of the trial court to so conclude.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Grey Wolf, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Nos.
33-34590, 33-75338, 333-19027, 333-65049, 333-41334, and 333-90888 on Form S-8
of Grey Wolf, Inc. and Registration Statements Nos. 333-14783, 333-06077,
333-26519, 333-20423, 333-36593, 333-39683, 333-86949, and 333-40874 on Form S-3
of Grey Wolf, Inc., of our report dated February 3, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Grey Wolf, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December
31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders' equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, and the related
financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2002
annual report on From 10-K of Grey Wolf, Inc.

                                                KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
March 6, 2003
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JACOB HOWARD,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

BERNADETTE GAMBINO, LA Sheriff

Dept Chief Medical Officer LA County

Jail; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-56241

D.C. No. 2:01-cv-05689-JFW-CW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 25, 2011** 

Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Jacob Howard appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force and deliberate indifference to 

FILED

NOV 02 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-56241

his serious medical needs while a pretrial detainee at Los Angeles County Jail. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s

dismissal for failure to exhaust under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C.

§ 1997e(a) (“PLRA”). Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir. 2003). We

reverse and remand.

Defendants have not met their burden of proving that Howard’s action

should be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, where they

relied on a declaration by their attorney stating that she reviewed documents

contained in her office file, rather than conducting a complete search of the jail’s

tracking system for inmate grievances and their dispositions. See id. at 1116-17,

1119-20 (the PLRA does not impose a pleading requirement but a defense, and an

incomplete record is inadequate to establish nonexhaustion). Defendants also

failed adequately to address Howard’s arguments that he did not receive a response

to his excessive force grievance and that additional remedies were therefore

unavailable. See Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 935 (9th Cir. 2005) (concluding

that “a prisoner need not press on to exhaust further levels of review once he has []

received all ‘available’ remedies”). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment, and

remand for further proceedings.
3 10-56241

We do not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See

Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam).

REVERSED and REMANDED.
Exhibit 10.17

North Atlantic Small Companies Investment Trust PLC

c/o North Atlantic Value LLP

James Ryan

Ground Floor, Ryder Court

14 Ryder Street

London SW1Y 6QB

UNITED KINGDOM

Series A-1 and Series A-2 Redeemable Preferred Stock

North Atlantic Small Companies Investment Trust PLC herewith consents to an extension of the redemption date of its 99.25 shares of Series A-l Redeemable Preferred Stock and 138.95 shares of Series A-2 Redeemable Preferred Stock, issued by
Telos Corporation, to December 31, 2011. This stock shall remain subject to any and all terms and conditions of the Preferred Stockholders Standby Agreement (integrated hereto by reference), entered into by North Atlantic Small Companies
Investment Trust PLCs predecessor, Hare & Co., on or about January 27, 2003 with Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc. (formerly Foothill Capital Corporation).

AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED,



|                                                    |  |  |  |                                    
|--------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------
|North Atlantic Small Companies Investment Trust PLC |  |  |  | Telos Corporation                  
|By:                                                 |  |  |  |                                    
|                                                    |  | 
|LOGO                                                |  |  |  | /s/ Therese K. Hathaway            
|Signature(s):                                       |  |  |  | Therese K. Hathaway                
|                                                    |  |  |  | Vice President, Corporate Secretary
|                                                    |  | 
|LOGO                                                |  |  |  |                                    
|Name(s):                                            |  |  |  |                                    
|                                                    |  | 
|LOGO                                                |  |  |  |                                    
|Title:                                              |  |  |  |                                    
|                                                    |  | 
|6/4/2008                                            |  |  |  | March 13, 2008                     
|Date:                                               |  |  |  |
STEVEN-KYLE CREWS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-0793

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 4, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Baker County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

Steven-Kyle Crews, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WINOKUR, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,192,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,223,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,383,000
<PP&E>                                      95,019,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,617,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             101,039,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,594,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       20,000,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       172,000      
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,893,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               101,039,000
<SALES>                                     98,057,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            99,926,000
<CGS>                                       79,390,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               79,390,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,497,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,857,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,460,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,438,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,022,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,022,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>