alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4.1

       

      

      The Company’s authorized capital stock consists of 500,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Preferred
        Stock”), and 20,000,000 Common Stock.

       

      

      The following is a summary of the material provisions of the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the
        “Certificate of Incorporation”) and Amended and Restated By-laws (the “By-laws”), insofar as they relate to the material terms of the Common

       

      

      Stock. This description summarizes the material terms and provisions of the Common Stock, but it is not complete. This summary
        is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws, which are incorporated herein by reference.

       

      

      Each holder of the Common Stock is entitled to one vote for each share on all matters to be voted upon by the stockholders and
        there are no cumulative voting rights. In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, holders of the Common

       

      

      Stock would be entitled to share in the Company’s assets remaining after the payment of the Company’s debts and liabilities.
        Holders of the Common Stock have no preemptive or conversion rights or other subscription rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the Common Stock. The rights, preferences and privileges of the holders of the
        Common Stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of shares of any series of Preferred Stock that we may designate in the future.

       

      

      The Common Stock is not convertible into, or exchangeable for, any other class or series of the Company’s capital stock.
        Holders of the Common Stock do not have preemptive or other rights to subscribe for or purchase additional securities of the Company. Certain provisions of the Company’s articles of incorporation and bylaws may delay, discourage, prevent or render
        more difficult an attempt to obtain control of the Company, whether through a tender offer, business combination, proxy contest or otherwise. These provisions include the charter authorization of “blank check” preferred stock (as described above)
        and a restriction on the ability of stockholders to call a special meeting.
Document

Exhibit 10.26



SailPoint Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation
This document summarizes the non-employee director compensation policy of SailPoint Technologies Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) effective August 1, 2019, but subject to revision from time to time by the Board or its Compensation Committee.  
The non-employee members of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of SailPoint Technologies Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) will be entitled to receive the following compensation during each year of service as a director:
 
									
	Annual cash retainer	$	30,000 	
	Additional annual cash retainer for the Chairman of the Board	$	20,000 	
	Additional annual cash retainer for Chairman of the Audit Committee	$	20,000 	
	Additional cash retainer for members of the Audit Committee	$	10,000 	
	Additional cash retainer for the Chairman of the Compensation Committee	$	12,000 	
	Additional annual cash retainer for members of the Compensation Committee	$	6,000 	
	Additional annual cash retainer for Chairman of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee	$	7,500 	
	Additional cash retainer for members of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee	$	3,750 	
	Additional annual cash retainer for Chairman of the Cybersecurity Committee	$	10,000 	
	Additional cash retainer for members of the Cybersecurity Committee	$	5,000 	
	Annual equity retainer of restricted stock units	$	180,000 	


 
The cash retainer and committee and chairmanship fees are payable in cash on a quarterly basis.  Annual amounts are subject to pro ration for partial years of service.
Order entered April 17, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 19 - 00927 - CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V. BRIAN CARL JONES, Appellee On Appeal from the County Cr iminal Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MA17 - 81084 - C

ORDER Appellee’s motion for a third extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED, and the Clerk of the Court is ordered to file the brief tendered to the Court.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

S.G., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE,

Chicago, IL, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0704

Issued: July 25, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On April 18, 2023 appellant filed a timely appeal from a March 15, 2023 merit decision of

the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 23-0704.

In a letter dated June 28, 2023, and received on July 5, 2023, appellant requested that the 

appeal be withdrawn.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that appellant’s request for the 

withdrawal of the appeal should be granted. Accordingly, 
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the withdrawal of the appeal 

is granted. The appeal docketed as No. 23-0704 is dismissed.

Issued: July 25, 2023

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

August 13, 2015

ABELACOSTA, CLERK

AARON JACOB MOORE

VS.

STATE OF TEXAS

No. PD-1634-14

IN THE

PD-1634-1

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL

AUSTIN, TEXA

Transmitted 8/13/2015 8:55:42 Al

Accepted 8/13/2015 10:11:47 Af

ABEL ACOST,

CLER

§ COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STATE OF TEXAS

STATE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF

TO APPELLANT'S BRIEF ON THE MERITS

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

COMES NOW the State of Texas by and through its District Attorney, 268th

Judicial District, Fort Bend County, and pursuant to Rule ofAppellate Procedure 70.4

moves this Court to grant leave to file a reply to Appellant's briefon the merits ofthe

State's petition for discretionary review.

This Court granted the State's petition on one issue:

Does the court of appeals's construction of "the state" in Section

54.02(j)(4)(A), Family Code require dismissal of a case with prejudice

without consideration ofthe factors for oppressive delay in violation of

the separation of powers doctrine?

Moore v. State, No. PD-1634-14 (Tex. Crim. App. April 22, 2015).

The State filed its brief on June 9, 2015, and Appellant filed his brief on July

27, 2015. This Court has set this case for submission on August 19, 2015.

The State believes that its reply to Appellant's brief will aid this Court in its

decision by concisely addressing flaws inAppellant's argument, such asthatthe office

ofthe district attorney is legislatively, rather than constitutionally created, and that
Williams v. State, 938 S.W.2d 456 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997), supports a finding that

Section 54.02(j)(4)(A) is contractual in nature like the Interstate Agreement for

Detainers Act.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the State respectfully asks this

Court to grant it leave to file its reply to Appellant's briefon the merits ofthe question

granted.

Respectfully submitted,

k John F. Healey, Jr.

SBOT # 09328300

District Attorney, 268th Judicial District

Fort Bend County, Texas

/s/ Gail Kikawa McConnell

Gail Kikawa McConnell

SBOT# 11395400

Assistant District Attorney

301 Jackson Street, Room 101

Fort Bend County, Texas 77469

(281) 238-3205 / (281) 238-3340 (fax)

Gail.McConnell@fortbendcountytx.gov

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy ofthe foregoing State's motion for leave to file its

reply brief was served on August 13, 2015, by the electronic filing manager or by

email August 13, 2015, on Ms. Carmen Roe, Attorney for Appellant,

<carmen@,carrneiiroe.corn>. and on Ms. Lisa McMinn, State Prosecuting Attorney,

<Lisa.McMinn@spa.texas.gov>.

Gail Kikawa McConnell

Gail Kikawa McConnell
# C_2007196EN.01000801.xml

| 24.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 196/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4826 — Teck Cominco/Aur Resources)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 196/02)

On 10 August 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4826. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4826. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 212 (Thursday, November 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 66888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21959]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 10228 and <greek-i> 10229]


New Hampshire Disaster <greek-i> NH-00001

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for the State of New Hampshire (FEMA-1610-DR), dated October 
26, 2005.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: October 7, 2005 through October 18, 2005.
    Effective Date: October 26, 2005.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: December 27, 2005.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: July 26, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, National Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 
Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 
6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on October 26, 2005, 
applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed 
above or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties:
    Cheshire, Grafton, Hillsborough, Merrimack, and Sullivan.
Contiguous Counties:
    New Hampshire: Belknap, Carroll, Coos, Rockingham, and Strafford.
    Massachusetts: Essex, Franklin, Middlesex, and Worcester.
    Vermont: Caledonia, Essex, Orange, Windham, and Windsor.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere....................     5.375
Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere.................     2.687
Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere....................     6.557
Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit      4.000
 Available Elsewhere..........................................
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit             4.750
 Available Elsewhere..........................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere..........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 102286 
and for economic injury is 102290.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 05-21959 Filed 11-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# L_2007346EN.01002901.xml

| 29.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 346/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 346/29

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUPT/2/2007

of 18 December 2007

concerning the appointment of the Head of the European Union Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo)

(2007/888/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular the third paragraph of Article 25 thereof,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2006/304/CFSP of 10 April 2006 on the establishment of an EU Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo) regarding a possible EU crisis management operation in the field of rule of law and possible other areas in Kosovo (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2007/778/CFSP of 29 November 2007 amending and extending Joint Action 2006/304/CFSP on the establishment of an EU Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo) regarding a possible EU crisis management operation in the field of rule of law and possible other areas in Kosovo (2),

Whereas:

Article 6 of Joint Action 2006/304/CFSP provides for the Council to authorise the Political and Security Committee to take the relevant decisions in accordance with Article 25 of the Treaty, including the decision to appoint, upon a proposal by the Secretary-General/High Representative, a Head of the EU Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo).

The Secretary-General/High Representative has proposed the appointment of Roy REEVE,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Roy REEVE is hereby appointed Head of the EU Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo) regarding a possible EU crisis management operation in the field of rule of law and possible other areas in Kosovo.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on 1 January 2008.

It shall apply until 31 March 2008.

Done at Brussels, 18 December 2007.

For the Political and Security Committee

The President

C. DURRANT PAIS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 112, 26.4.2006, p. 19.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 312, 30.11.2007, p. 68.

2

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

RICKY A. PIERCE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. No. 95-6602

PEGGY JONES; DEBORAH ADLES,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.

Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge.

(CA-94-68-5-BO)

Submitted: November 30, 1995

Decided: January 3, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and

BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Ricky A. Pierce, Appellant Pro Se. Neil Clark Dalton, NORTH

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Pierce appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action.

The district court awarded summary judgment upon recommendation

by a magistrate judge. Although we express no opinion as to the ultimate success of Appellant's claims, we vacate the district court's

order and remand for further proceedings.

Pierce filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation. Apparently, these objections were not brought to

the attention of the district court. The court's order refers to Defendants' motions to dismiss or for summary judgment, Pierce's motions

to transmit the record and to compel, and to the magistrate judge's

report. However, there is no mention of Appellant's objections.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (1988), the district court is obligated

to review de novo those portions of the magistrate judge's report to

which objections are filed. See United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d

91, 93 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1208 (1984). The district

court's order, however, does not state whether it conducted a review

of the record as to those objections or made a decision on the disputed

issues de novo. Because Pierce made specific, timely objections to the

magistrate judge's factual findings, the district court's error was not

harmless. Orpiano v. Johnson, 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982).

Therefore, we vacate the district court's order and remand the matter for the district court to conduct the required de novo review and

issue a decision or to state that it conducted such review before rendering its previous decision. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration # 10203 and # 10204] 

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 3. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Texas (FEMA-1606-DR), dated 09/24/2005. 

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Rita.                     

*Incident Period:*                         09/23/2005 through 10/14/2005.                     

*Effective Date:*                         10/25/2005.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         01/11/2006.                     

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/26/2006.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: Small Business Administration, National Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Texas, dated 09/24/2005, is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a result of this disaster to 01/11/2006. 

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) 

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 05-21957 Filed 11-2-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# L_2006367EN.01003201.xml

| 22.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 367/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 367/32

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1949/2006

of 21 December 2006

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 958/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 21 December 2006, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 21 December 2006, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 21 December 2006, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 shall be 29,338 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 22 December 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 December 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1585/2006 (OJ L 294, 25.10.2006, p. 19).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 49.

2

---