alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-05-038] 

# TIME AND DATE: 

November 8, 2005 at 11 a.m. 

# PLACE:

 Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# STATUS:

 Open to the public. 

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

1. Agenda for future meetings: None 

2. Minutes 

3. Ratification List 

4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-388-391 and 731-TA-816-821 (Review) (Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from France, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, and Korea)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before November 21, 2005.) 

5. Outstanding action jackets: None 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

Issued: October 27, 2005. 

By order of the Commission 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 05-21712 Filed 10-27-05; 11:42 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 212 (Thursday, November 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 66851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21887]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--PXI Systems Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 11, 2005, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. 
has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Mindready 
Solutions, Inc., Saint Lauarent, Quebec, Canada has been added as a 
party to this venture. Also, Corelis, Inc., Cerritos, CA; and Kaparel 
Corporation, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada have withdrawn as parties to 
this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. intends 
to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. filed its original 
notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 
6(b) of the Act on March 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 20, 
2005. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on August 12, 2005 (70 FR 47232).

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 05-21887 Filed 11-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### In re the DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY STRIPPER WELL EXEMPTION LITIGATION. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, et al., Defendants.

Civ. A. No. 78-1070.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

Oct. 31, 1990.

David A. Holzworth and Leslie K. Dellon, Lepon, McCarthy, Jutkowitz *&*Holzworth, Washington, D.C., Evan J. Olson, Hersh-berger, Patterson, Jones & Roth, Wichita, Kan. (John E. Robertson and F. Kimball Joyner, Jr., Mobil Exploration & Producing *1527U.S. Inc., Dallas, Tex., of counsel), for plaintiff/third party plaintiff Mobil Oil Corp.

Kathryn Bass, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Joe Mark Elkouri, Gen. Counsel, Oklahoma Tax Com’n, Oklahoma City, Okl., for third party defendant State of Okl.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

THEIS, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the State of Oklahoma’s motion to release the stay of further distributions from the M.D.L. 378 escrow. By order dated August 31, 1989, the court stayed further distributions to the State of Oklahoma pending the outcome of Mobil Oil Corporation’s claim against the State of Oklahoma. According to Oklahoma’s motion, Mobil and Oklahoma have settled Mobil’s claim; Mobil has filed motions to dismiss its appeals from this court’s order of June 12, 1990, 739 F.Supp. 1449 which granted Oklahoma’s motion to dismiss; and that counsel for Mobil has authorized counsel for Oklahoma to state that Mobil does not object to a release of the stay of further distributions to Oklahoma from the M.D.L. 378 escrow. Since the matter has been settled, the court shall grant Oklahoma’s motion and order the release of the funds.

IT IS BY THE COURT THEREFORE ORDERED that Oklahoma’s motion to release stay of further distributions to the State of Oklahoma from M.D.L. 378 escrow (Doc. 1955) is hereby granted. Bank IV is hereby authorized and ordered to release to the State of Oklahoma as soon as practicable all funds which it has withheld from distribution pursuant to the court’s order of August 31, 1989.

The clerk shall mail copies of this order to counsel of record and Martin G. Istock, Senior Vice President, Bank IV.
# C_2007282EN.01001401.xml

| 24.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/14

---

COUNCIL DECISION

COUNCIL DECISION

of 19 November 2007

appointing a member of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency

(2007/C 282/10)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular the second and third paragraphs of Article 54 thereof,

Having regard to Article X of the Statutes of the Euratom Supply Agency (1), as last amended by Council Decision 95/1/EC, Euratom, ECSC (2),

1

2

Having regard to the Council Decision 2007/514/Euratom of 10 July 2007 appointing the members of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency (3),

3

Having regard to the opinion of the Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | A member's seat on the above Committee has fallen vacant following the resignation of Ms Marie-Claire GUYADER, of which the Council was informed on 19 September 2007. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

A member's seat on the above Committee has fallen vacant following the resignation of Ms Marie-Claire GUYADER, of which the Council was informed on 19 September 2007.

| (2) | That vacancy should therefore be filled. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

That vacancy should therefore be filled.

| (3) | The French Government submitted a nomination on 19 September 2007, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The French Government submitted a nomination on 19 September 2007,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Mr Bruno QUAGLIA is hereby appointed a member of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency for the remainder of the Committee's term of office, which ends on 28 March 2009.

Done at Brussels, 19 November 2007.

For the Council

The President

L. AMADO

---

(1)  OJ 27, 6.12.1958, p. 534/58.

1

(2)  OJ L 1, 1.1.1995, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 190, 21.7.2007, p. 15.

3

---
EXHIBIT 31.3


CERTIFICATION OF


PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, David J. Schramm, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Maxwell Technologies, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.





October 10, 2013/S/    DAVIDJ. SCHRAMMDavid J. SchrammPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michelle M. Lantow, Chief Financial Officer, in connection with the Report on Form 10-Q of McCormick & Schmicks Seafood Restaurants, Inc. for the quarterly period ended
September 25, 2010 (the Report), hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of McCormick & Schmicks Seafood
Restaurants, Inc.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ MICHELLE M. LANTOW 
|Michelle M. Lantow     
|Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 3, 2010
# C_2007248EN.01000401.xml

| 23.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4671 — UTC/Initial ESG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 248/03)

On 25 June 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4671. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4671. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
# L_2007165EN.01003502.xml

| 27.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 165/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 165/35

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 209/2007 of 27 February 2007 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 laying down detailed rules for the supply of food from intervention stocks for the benefit of the most deprived persons in the Community

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 61 of 28 February 2007
  )

The publication of this Regulation in the abovementioned Official Journal is annulled.

---
# C_2007092EN.01000301.xml

| 27.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4603 — EQT/CBR)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 92/05)

On 13 April 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4603. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4603. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 29, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-2000
<CASH>                                          14,555
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,874
<ALLOWANCES>                                       561
<INVENTORY>                                    237,165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               377,674
<PP&E>                                         153,683
<DEPRECIATION>                                  59,178
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 505,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          189,100
<BONDS>                                        303,044
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,538)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   505,055
<SALES>                                        268,424
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               268,424
<CGS>                                          193,928
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  193,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,995
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   309
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,770
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,603
<INCOME-TAX>                                       477
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,126
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,126
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### CITY BANK FARMERS TRUST COMPANY, VIRGINIA H. BERG AND RUTH H. COWEN, AS TRUSTEES UNDER THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF CLARENCE J. HOUSMAN, DECEASED, TRUST FOR RUTH H. COWEN, v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. 45471.

Decided October 5, 1942]

*Mr. Herbert Stern*for the plaintiffs. *Mr. Aaron W. Berg*was on the brief.

*Mrs. Elizabeth B. Davis,*with whom was *Mr. Assistant Attorney General Samuel O. Ciarle, Jr.,*for the defendant. *Mr. Robert N. Anderson*and *Mr. Fred K. Dyar*were on the brief.

*316The court decided that the plaintiffs were not entitled to recover, in an opinion *per oiuriamv,*as follows:

The facts in this case and the question presented therein are identical with the facts and question presented in the *317case of these plaintiffs, as trustees, under the trust for Virginia H. Berg, No. 45470.

Upon the authorities there cited and discussed, and for the reasons therein stated, the plaintiffs are not entitled to recover in this case. The petition is therefore dismissed. It is so ordered. "s
**Exhibit 4**

 

**NAVISTAR FINANCIAL CORPORATION**

**AND SUBSIDIARIES**

 

**INSTRUMENTS DEFINING RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS,**

**INCLUDING INDENTURES**

 

The following instruments of Navistar Financial Corporation defining the rights of security holders are incorporated herein by reference:

 

| 4.1 | Credit Agreement for $1,200,000,000 Revolving Credit and Competitive Advance Facility dated as of July 1, 2005, between the Corporation, Arrendadora Financiera Navistar, S.A. de C.V., Servicios Financieros Navistar, S.A. de C.V. and Navistar Comercial, S.A. de C.V., as borrowers, lenders party hereto, The Chase Manhattan Bank as Administrative Agent, Bank of America as Syndication Agent and Bank of Nova Scotia  as  Documentation  Agent.  Filed as Form 8-K September 1,  2005.  Commission File No. 001-04146. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 4.2 | 4.3     Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 25, 2002, by and among the Corporation, Navistar, Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. and Banc of America Securities, LLC.  Filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Form S-3 dated May 7, 2002.   Commission File No. 333-87716-01. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

**E-2**
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

In the Matter of O.O., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, 

Hickory, NC, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 20-0142

Issued: October 27, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Daniel F. Read, Esq., for the appellant

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER GRANTING FEE PETITION

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

Counsel for appellant has filed a request for approval of attorney’s fee in the amount of 

$600.00.

1 The Board notes that all petitions for approval of fees for representatives’ services are 

considered under the Board’s statutory authority found at section 8127 of the Federal Employees’

Compensation Act2(FECA) and under its Rules of Procedure found at 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e).

3

As required by the Board’s regulations, appellant has been afforded written notice of the 

fee requested and provided an opportunity to comment on the fee petition. 4 Attached to the fee 

petition is a signed acknowledgement by appellant consenting to the fee in the amount of $600.00.

1 FECA (5 U.S.C. § 8127(b)) and its implementing regulations (20 C.F.R. § 501.9) require the Board to review each 

fee petition on its own merits and with regard to the unique facts and issues of each appeal. 

2

5 U.S.C. § 8127.

3

20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). 

4

Id.
2

The Board has reviewed the fee petition, and finds that it is in compliance with the Board’s 

Rules of Procedure.

5

 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the fee petition is granted in the amount of $600.00.

Issued: October 27, 2023

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

5

Id.
**Exhibit 31(b)**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Glenn R. Richter, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this amendment to annual report on Form 10-K of Sears, Roebuck and Co.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this amendment to annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this amendment to annual report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisamendment to annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisamendment to annual report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, orcaused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to bedesigned under oursupervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relatingto the registrant, includingits consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within thoseentities, particularly duringthe period in which thisamendment to annual report isbeing prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’sdisclosure controls andprocedures and presented inthis amendment to annualreport our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of thedisclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by thisamendment to annual reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this amendmentto annual report any changein the registrant’s internalcontrol over financialreporting that occurredduring the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of anannual report) that hasmaterially affected, or isreasonably likely tomaterially affect, theregistrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses inthe design or operation ofinternal control overfinancial reporting which arereasonably likely toadversely affect theregistrant’s ability torecord, process, summarizeand report financialinformation; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involvesmanagement or other employeeswho have a significant rolein the registrant’s internalcontrol over financialreporting.
Date: February 15, 2005
/s/ Glenn R. Richter