66850 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 212 / Thursday, November 3, 2005 / Notices 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

later than June 14, 2005. Jevtec did not 

file a response to the order, an answer 

to the complaint, or a notice of 

appearance within the time permitted. 

On June 15, 2005, the ALJ issued an 

ID (Order No. 39) finding Jevtec in 

default. No party petitioned for review 

of the ID. On July 11, 2005, the 

Commission determined not to review 

that initial determination. 

On June 21, 2005, the ALJ issued an 

ID (Order No. 41), granting 3M’s motion 

for a summary determination of a 

violation of section 337. The ID notes 

that only the ‘‘097 patent is at issue in 

the summary determination, because the 

investigation has been terminated with 

respect to all respondents charged with 

infringement of the ‘‘092 patent. No 

party petitioned for review of the ID. 

In Order No. 41, the ALJ 

recommended the issuance of a general 

exclusion order. He also recommended 

that the bond permitting temporary 

importation during the Presidential 

review period be set at 100 percent of 

the value of the infringing imported 

product. 

On July 15, 2005, the Commission 

determined not to review the ALJ’s 

summary determination that 3M has 

shown that there is a violation of section 

337. It also issued a Federal Register 

notice, inviting written submissions on 

the ALJ’s recommended determination 

on remedy and bonding as well as 

submissions on the public interest. 

On July 25, 2005, the Commission 

received comments from complainant 

3M and the IA. No reply submissions 

were received. 

Having examined the relevant 

portions of the record, including ALJ 

Order No. 41, and the written 

submissions on remedy, the public 

interest and bonding, the Commission 

has determined to issue a general 

exclusion order prohibiting unlicensed 

entry for consumption of foam masking 

tape that is covered by claims 1, 7, 8, 10, 

11, 13, 14 or 16 of the ‘097 patent. In 

so doing the Commission determined 

that the public interest factors 

enumerated in section 337(d) do not 

preclude the issuance of the 

aforementioned remedial order and the 

bond during the Presidential review 

period shall be 100 percent of the 

entered value of the article in question. 

The Commission’s order was delivered 

to the President and the United States 

Trade Representative on the day of its 

issuance. 

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and §§ 210.42 

and 210.50 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.42 

and 210.50. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 31, 2005. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 05–21950 Filed 11–2–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–718 (Second 

Review)] 

Glycine From China 

Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year review, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (Commission) determines, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the 

Act), that revocation of the antidumping 

duty order on glycine from China would 

be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. 

Background 

The Commission instituted this 

review on June 1, 2005 (70 FR 31534) 

and determined on September 7, 2005 

that it would conduct an expedited 

review (70 FR 55625, September 22, 

2005). 

The Commission transmitted its 

determination in this review to the 

Secretary of Commerce on October 31, 

2005. The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 3810 

(October 2005), entitled Glycine from 

China: Investigation No. 731–TA–718 

(Second Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 31, 2005. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 05–21951 Filed 11–2–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

and Explosives 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comments Requested 

ACTION: 30-day notice of information 

collection under review: Identification 

Markings Placed on Firearms. 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

and Explosives (ATF) has submitted the 

following information collection request 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed 

information collection is published to 

obtain comments from the public and 

affected agencies. This proposed 

information collection was previously 

published in the Federal Register 

Volume 70, Number 146, page 44117 on 

August 1, 2005, allowing for a 60 day 

comment period. 

The purpose of this notice is to allow 

for an additional 30 days for public 

comment until December 5, 2005. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

regarding the items contained in this 

notice, especially the estimated public 

burden and associated response time, 

should be directed to the Office of 

Management and Budget, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention Department of Justice Desk 

Officer, Washington, DC 20503. 

Additionally, comments may be 

submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 

395–5806. Written comments and 

suggestions from the public and affected 

agencies concerning the proposed 

collection of information are 

encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agencies estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of a currently approved 

collection. 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 212 / Thursday, November 3, 2005 / Notices 66851 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: 

Identification Markings Placed on 

Firearms. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

Form Number: None. Bureau of Alcohol, 

Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Primary: Business or other forprofit. Other: None. Each licensed 

firearms manufacturer or licensed 

firearm importer must legibly identify 

each firearm by engraving, casting, 

stamping (impressing), or otherwise 

conspicuously placing on the frame or 

receiver an individual serial number. 

Also, ATF requires minimum height 

and depth requirements for 

identification markings placed on 

firearms. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond/reply: It is estimated that 2,962 

respondents will take 5 seconds to mark 

the firearm. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: It is estimated that 2,962 

respondents will take 5 seconds to mark 

the firearm. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Brenda E. Dyer, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building, 

Suite 1600, 601 D Street NW., 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: October 28, 2005. 

Brenda E. Dyer, 

Department Clearance Officer, Department of 

Justice. 

[FR Doc. 05–21901 Filed 11–2–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant To The National 

Cooperative Research And Production 

Act of 1993—Institute of Electrical And 

Electronics Engineers 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

October 4, 2005, pursuant to section 6(a) 

of the National Cooperative Research 

and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 

4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Institute of 

Electrical and Electronics Engineers 

(‘‘IEEE’’) has filed written notifications 

simultaneously with the Attorney 

General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing additions or 

changes to its standards development 

activities. The notifications were filed 

for the purpose of extending the Act’s 

provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, 23 new standards have 

been initiated and 9 existing standards 

are being revised. More detail regarding 

these changes can be found at http:// 

standards.ieee.org/standardswire/sba/ 

09–22–05.html. 

On September 17, 2004, IEEE filed its 

original notification pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the Act. The Department of 

Justice published a notice in the Federal 

Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the 

Act on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on September 8, 2005. 

A notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on September 28, 2005 (70 FR 

56736). 

Dorothy B. Fountain, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 05–21888 Filed 11–2–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—PXI Systems Alliance, 

Inc. 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

October 11, 2005, pursuant to section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), PXI 

Systems Alliance, Inc. has filed written 

notifications simultaneously with the 

Attorney General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing changes in its 

membership. The notifications were 

filed for the purpose of extending the 

Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, Mindready Solutions, Inc., 

Saint Lauarent, Quebec, Canada has 

been added as a party to this venture. 

Also, Corelis, Inc., Cerritos, CA; and 

Kaparel Corporation, Waterloo, Ontario, 

Canada have withdrawn as parties to 

this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and PXI Systems 

Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional 

written notification disclosing all 

changes in membership. 

On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems 

Alliance, Inc. filed its original 

notification pursuant to section 6(a) of 

the Act. The Department of Justice 

published a notice in the Federal 

Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the 

Act on March 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on July 20, 2005. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the 

Act on August 12, 2005 (70 FR 47232). 

Dorothy B. Fountain, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 05–21887 Filed 11–2–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comments Requested 

ACTION: 30-day notice of information 

collection under review: Application for 

Registration (DEA Form 363) and 

Application for Registration Renewal 

(DEA Form 363a). 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), Drug 

Enforcement Administration (DEA) has 

submitted the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection is 

published to obtain comments from the 

public and affected agencies. This 

proposed information collection was 

previously published in the Federal 

Register Volume 70, Number 154, page 

46887 on August 11, 2005, allowing for 

a 60 day comment period. 

The purpose of this notice is to allow 

for an additional 30 days for public 

comment until December 5, 2005. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

regarding the items contained in this 

notice, especially the estimated public 

burden and associated response time, 

should be directed to the Office of 

Management and Budget, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention Department of Justice Desk 

Officer, Washington, DC 20503. 

Additionally, comments may be 

submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 

395–5806. Written comments and 

suggestions from the public and affected 

agencies concerning the proposed 

collection of information are 

encouraged. Your comments should