alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 211 (Wednesday, November 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 66484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21815]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

October 26, 2005.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
11000, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Dates: Written comments should be received on or before December 2, 
2005 to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1500.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Pre-Screening Notice and Certification Request for the Work 
Opportunity and Welfare-to-Work Credits.
    Form: IRS form 8850.
    Description: A job applicant completes and signs, under penalties 
of perjury, the top portion of the form to indicate that he or she is a 
member of a targeted group. If the employer has a belief that the 
applicant is a member of a targeted group, the employer signs the other 
portion of the form under penalties of perjury and submits it to the 
SESA as part of a written request of certification.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,596,000 hours.

    OMB Number: 1545-1509.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: 941 Telefile, Employer's Quarterly Federal Tax Returns.
    Form: IRS form 941.
    Description: Form 941 Telefile is used by employers to report by 
phone payments made to employees subject to income and social security 
and Medicare taxes and the amounts of these taxes.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit, Not-for-profit 
institutions and State, Local or Tribal Government.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 7,488,800 hours.

    Clearance Officer: Glenn P. Kirkland, (202) 622-3428. Internal 
Revenue Service, Room 6516, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7316. Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Michael A. Robinson,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-21815 Filed 11-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

T.C., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE,

Detroit, MI, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 22-0629

Issued: April 28, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On March 27, 2022 appellant filed an appeal from a September 21, 2021 decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP).1 The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 22-0629.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act.2 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance 

of OWCP’s decision.3

The 180th day following the September 21, 2021 decision was January 15, 2022. As 

appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until March 27, 2022,more than 180 days after 

the September 21, 2021 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 

1 The Board notes that appellant appealed from a July 19, 2021 OWCP decision. However, this decision was not 

adverse in nature as OWCP accepted appellant’s claim. As such, the Board has no jurisdiction over it. See 

20 C.F.R. § 501.3.

2

5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

3

Id. at § 501.3(e).
2

22-0629 is untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has 

not offered a reason to explain the failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation 

sufficient to establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision 

issued by OWCP within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the 

appeal docketed as No. 22-0629, must be dismissed.4 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 22-0629 is dismissed.

Issued: April 28, 2022

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

4 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id.

at § 501.6(d).
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

E.P., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, PROCESSING & 

DISTRIBUTION CENTER, Kansas City, KS,

Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 24-0115

Issued: December 21, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On November 19, 2023 appellant filed an appeal from a May 19, 2023 merit decision of 

the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned the appeal Docket No. 24-0115.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act.1 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance 

of OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the May 19, 2023 decision was November 15, 2023. As 

appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until November 19, 2023, more than 180 days 

after the May 19, 2023 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 24-0115

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the 

date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.”
2

is untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not 

explained her failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to 

establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP 

within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed 

as No. 24-0115, must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 24-0115 is dismissed.

Issued: December 21, 2023

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id.

at § 501.6(d).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PATRICK LAMONTE HICKSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 48 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER AMENDING RULE S 2.3
AND 3.6 AND THE COMMENT TO
RULE 3.1 OF THE RULES
GOVERNING STANDARDS OF
CONDUCT OF MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT JUDGES :

:

:

:

:

:

:

: NO. 421

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2 5 th day of April

, 2018, upon the recommendation of the Minor Court Rules Committee ; the proposal having been submitted without publication pursuant
to Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(a)(3) :

I t is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania
that Rule s 2.3 and 3.6 and the Comment to Rule 3.1 of the Rules Governing Standards
of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges are amended in the attached form.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall
be effective July 1, 2018

.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Delet ions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
<SEQUENCE>13

                                  EXHIBIT 32.a


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regent Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2001, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David A. Nelson, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        /S/ DAVID A. NELSON
                                        -------------------
Date: September 12, 2005
                                        David A. Nelson,
                                        Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                        Accounting Officer
#### NATHANIEL REASON, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 10755

June 8, 1978

579 P.2d 781

*Morgan D. Harris,*Public Defender, and *Terrence M. Jackson,*Deputy Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellant.

*Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *George E. Holt,*District Attorney, and *L. J. O’Neale,*Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Nathaniel Reason duly and timely appeared in a magistrate’s court in Las Vegas for a scheduled preliminary examination. The prosecuting attorney was not prepared to go forward because he had not arranged to have “certain necessary physical evidence” available at the hearing.

Reason’s motion to dismiss was denied and the hearing was continued on the oral request of the prosecuting attorney. Reason then petitioned for habeas corpus and has appealed from the order denying the requested relief.

We have previously held that when a prosecuting attorney is not prepared to go forward with a scheduled preliminary examination he may set forth reasons why he may be entitled to a *301continuance by filing an affidavit pursuant to DCR 21. *See*Hill v. Sheriff, 85 Nev. 234, 452 P.2d 918 (1969). We have also held that, under certain circumstances, the prosecuting attorney may show the reasons that may warrant a continuance by tendering “sworn testimony” in lieu of the written affidavit required by *Hill.*Bustos v. Sheriff, 87 Nev. 622, 491 P.2d 1279 (1971).

Here, the prosecuting attorney neither filed an affidavit nor tendered sworn testimony. Rather, he took the position that it was the responsibility of the accused to arrange to have the physical evidence of the alleged crime before the magistrate. We decline to accept this novel argument. Alternatively, it is suggested that *Hill*and *Bustos*are distinguishable and therefore inapplicable because their requirements only apply when a witness fails to appear and not when there is a failure to have the incriminating evidence brought to the hearing, the suggested distinction is not persuasive.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand this case to the district court with instructions to grant Nathaniel Reason’s petition for the writ of habeas corpus. *See*McNair v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 434, 514 P.2d 1175 (1973).
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 7, 2019

NO. 03-18-00726-CV

Marie Bowser, Appellant

v.

Champion Mortgage/Champion Reverse Mortgage/Nationstar Mortgage/Mr. Cooper, as 

Nominee for Lender and Lender’s Successors and Assigns, and Bank of America, N.A., 

Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on August 29, 2018. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-30-1994
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1994
<CASH>                                         54
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,497
<ALLOWANCES>                                   356
<INVENTORY>                                    463
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,861
<PP&E>                                         6,033
<DEPRECIATION>                                 9,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,817
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,208
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       25
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,418
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,817
<SALES>                                        6,608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,608
<CGS>                                          4,046
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,717
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (109)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (16)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (93)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (93)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.17)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cubic Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, CEO and CFO, certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
                operations of the Company.

Date: October 4, 2005
Signature: /s/ Calvin A. Wallen, III
          --------------------------
          Calvin A. Wallen, III, CEO

Date: October 4, 2005
Signature: /s/ Jon Stuart Ross
          --------------------------
          Jon Stuart Ross, CFO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,470,861
<SECURITIES>                                    25,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,587,118
<ALLOWANCES>                                   267,579
<INVENTORY>                                  3,739,483
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,808,655
<PP&E>                                       6,070,364
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,222,618
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,734,577
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,158,702
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         30
<COMMON>                                        62,597
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,729,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,734,577
<SALES>                                     26,892,072
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,495,148
<CGS>                                       13,751,392
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,751,392
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,459,773
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,208,138
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (796,288)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (293,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (503,288)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (503,288)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. FREEMAN

No. 85 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 93.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 21 December 1976.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 214 (Monday, November 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 67456]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22088]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


Notice of Meeting

    The Commission of Fine Arts' meeting scheduled for December 15, 
2005 has been canceled. The next meeting is scheduled for January 19, 
2006 at 9 a.m. in the Commission's offices in the National Building 
Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20001-2728. Items of discussion affecting the appearance of Washington, 
DC, may include buildings, parks and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: http://www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding 
the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas E. Luebke, Secretary, Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address or call 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring sign 
language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the 
Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date.

    Dated in Washington, DC, November 1, 2005.
Thomas E. Luebke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-22088 Filed 11-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 214 (Monday, November 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 67476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-22116]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics: Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS) announces the following advisory 
committee meeting.

    Name: National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) 
Subcommittee on Privacy and Confidentiality.
    Time and Date: November 15, 2005 1 p.m.-5 p.m.
    Place: Hubert H. Humphrey Building, Room 705A, 200 Independence 
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20201.
    Status: Open.
    Purpose: The purpose of this working session will be to continue 
the discussion on a letter and report to the HHS Secretary on 
Privacy and the National Health Information Network.
    Contact Person For More Information: Substantive program 
information as well as summaries of meetings and a roster of 
committee members may be obtained from Maya A. Bernstein, Lead Staff 
for Subcommittee on Privacy and Confidentiality, Office of the 
Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, 434E Hubert H. 
Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., 20201; telephone 
(202) 690-7100; or Marjorie S. Greenberg, Executive Secretary, 
NCVHS, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention, 3311 Toledo Road, Room 2402, Hyattsville, 
Maryland 20782, telehpone (301) 458-4245. Information also is 
available on the NCVHS home page of the HHS Web site: http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/, where further information including an agenda 
will be posted when available.
    Should you require reasonable accommodation, please contact the 
CDC Office of Equal Employment Opportunity on (301) 458-4EEO (4336) 
as soon as possible.

    Dated: October 26, 2005.
James Scanlon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (OSDP) Office of 
the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 05-22116 Filed 11-4-05; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4151-05-M
MATTHEW SONNY THOMAS JR.

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 1628

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 20, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Thomas V. Dannhei s ser , Judge

.

Matthew Sonny Thomas Jr., pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Matthe w Pavese, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., WETHERELL and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.