Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 67087 

marketing and promotion programs. 

Prior to arriving at this budget, the 

committee considered alternative 

expenditure levels and alternative 

assessment levels. The committee 

agreed that the increased assessment 

rate was appropriate to cover expenses 

and build up its operating reserve to a 

satisfactory level ($14,303). The 

assessment rate of $0.95 per 

hundredweight of assessable dates was 

then determined by applying the 

following formula where: 

A = 2004–05 reserve on 10/1/05 

($1,000). 

B = 2005–06 reserve on 9/30/06 

($14,303). 

C = 2005–06 expenses ($169,197). 

D = Cull Surplus Fund ($2,000). 

E = 2005–06 expected shipments 

(190,000 hundredweight). 

(B ¥ A + C ¥ D) ÷ E = $0.95 per 

hundredweight. 

Estimated shipments should provide 

$180,500 in assessment income. Income 

derived from handler assessments and 

$2,000 from the cull surplus fund would 

be adequate to cover budgeted expenses. 

Funds in the administrative reserve are 

expected to total about $14,303 by 

September 30, 2006, and therefore 

would be less than the maximum 

permitted by the order (not to exceed 50 

percent of the average of expenses 

incurred during the most recent five 

preceding crop years as required under 

§ 987.72(c)). 

A review of historical information and 

preliminary information pertaining to 

the upcoming crop year indicates that 

the grower price for the 2005–06 season 

could range between $45 and $50 per 

hundredweight of dates. Therefore, the 

estimated assessment revenue for the 

2005–06 crop year as a percentage of 

total grower revenue is approximately 2 

percent. 

This action increases the assessment 

obligation imposed on handlers under 

the Federal marketing order. While 

assessments impose some additional 

costs on handlers, the costs are minimal 

and uniform on all handlers. Some of 

the additional costs may be passed on 

to producers. However, these costs will 

be offset by the benefits derived by the 

operation of the marketing order. In 

addition, the committee’s meeting was 

widely publicized throughout the 

California date industry and all 

interested persons were invited to 

attend the meeting and participate in 

committee deliberations on all issues. 

Like all committee meetings, the June 

16, 2005, meeting was a public meeting 

and all entities were able to express 

views on this issue. 

This rule imposes no additional 

reporting or recordkeeping requirements 

on either small or large California date 

handlers. As with all Federal marketing 

order programs, reports and forms are 

periodically reviewed to reduce 

information requirements and 

duplication by industry and public 

sector agencies. 

USDA has not identified any relevant 

Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or 

conflict with this rule. 

A proposed rule concerning this 

action was published in the Federal 

Register on September 12, 2005 (70 FR 

53737). Copies of the rule were mailed 

or sent via facsimile to all date handlers. 

Finally, the rule was made available 

through the Internet by USDA and the 

Office of the Federal Register. A 30-day 

comment period ending October 12, 

2005, was provided to allow interested 

persons to respond to the proposal. No 

comments were received. 

A small business guide on complying 

with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop 

marketing agreements and orders may 

be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/ 

fv/moab.html. Any questions about the 

compliance guide should be sent to Jay 

Guerber at the previously mentioned 

address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section. 

After consideration of all relevant 

material presented, including the 

information and recommendation 

submitted by the committee and other 

available information, it is hereby found 

that this rule, as hereinafter set forth, 

will tend to effectuate the declared 

policy of the Act. 

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it also found 

and determined that good cause exists 

for not postponing the effective date of 

this rule until 30 days after publication 

in the Federal Register because: (1) The 

2005–06 crop year began on October 1, 

2005, and the marketing order requires 

that the rate of assessment for each crop 

year apply to all assessable dates 

handled during such crop year; (2) the 

committee needs to have sufficient 

funds to pay its expenses which are 

incurred on a continuous basis; and (3) 

handlers are aware of this action which 

was unanimously recommended by the 

committee at a public meeting and is 

similar to other assessment rate actions 

issued in past years. Also, a 30-day 

comment period was provided for in the 

proposed rule, and no comments were 

received. 

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 987 

Dates, Marketing agreements, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

■ For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, 7 CFR part 987 is amended as 

follows: 

PART 987—DOMESTIC DATES 

PRODUCED OR PACKED IN 

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 

■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR 

part 987 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 

■ 2. Section 987.339 is revised to read 

as follows: 

§ 987.339 Assessment rate. 

On and after October 1, 2005, an 

assessment rate of $0.95 per 

hundredweight is established for 

California dates. 

Dated: October 31, 2005. 

Lloyd C. Day, 

Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 05–22046 Filed 11–3–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

8 CFR Parts 236, 239, 241 and 287 

[ICE No. 2298–03] 

RIN 1653–AA27 

Powers and Authority of Officers and 

Employees 

AGENCY: Department of Homeland 

Security. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This rule continues the 

process of conforming the text of the 

Code of Federal Regulations to the 

governmental structures established in 

the Homeland Security Act and 

Reorganization Plan. This rule is not 

intended to and does not restrict or 

otherwise limit the authority of any 

Department of Homeland Security 

officer. 

DATES: This final rule is effective 

November 4, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack 

Penca, Chief Counsel, Law Enforcement 

Support Center; 188 Harvest Lane, 

Williston,Vermont 05495; telephone 

number: (802) 872–6056. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 25, 2002, the President 

signed into law the Homeland Security 

Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat. 

2135) (HSA), 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq., which 

created the new Department of 

Homeland Security (Department or 

DHS). Pursuant to the provisions of the 

HSA, DHS came into existence on 

January 24, 2003. The functions of the 

67088 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 

Immigration and Naturalization Service 

(Service) and all authorities with respect 

to those functions, transferred to DHS 

on March 1, 2003, and the Service was 

abolished on that date, pursuant to the 

HSA and the Department of Homeland 

Security Reorganization Plan, as 

modified (Reorganization Plan). The 

transition and savings provisions of the 

HSA, including sections 1512(d) and 

1517 of the HSA, 6 U.S.C. 552(d), 557, 

provide that references relating to the 

Service in statutes, regulations, 

directives or delegations of authority 

shall be deemed to refer to the 

appropriate official or component of 

DHS. 

This rule amends various lists of DHS 

officials authorized to perform certain 

immigration enforcement functions, 

including making administrative arrests 

for immigration violations, making 

custody determinations, issuing Notices 

to Appear (which set forth the charges 

against an alien and order the alien to 

appear before an immigration judge), 

and issuing Warrants of Removal (which 

authorize the removal of an alien from 

the United States after the issuance of a 

final administrative order). While this 

rule constitutes a delegation of 

authority, and constitutes a public 

statement thereof, it is not the only 

means by which such authority may be 

delegated by the Secretary pursuant to 

8 CFR 2.1. The Secretary retains the 

authority to further delegate 

immigration authorities and functions 

through internal directives, memoranda, 

or other means. See Id. This rule does 

not alter any other delegation of 

authority by the Secretary that is not 

addressed in the rule. The rule does not 

affect any rights of aliens or the general 

public. See 8 CFR 287.12. 

Explanation of Changes 

This final rule: 

(1) Amends 8 CFR 236.1 to set forth 

a list of officers authorized to issue and 

serve Form I–286, Notice of Custody 

Determination. 

(2) Amends 8 CFR 239.1 to revise the 

list of officers authorized to issue a 

Notice to Appear, which sets forth the 

immigration charges against the alien. 

(3) Amends 8 CFR 241.2 to revise the 

list of officers authorized to issue 

Warrants of Removal, which 

authorizes the removal of an alien from 

the United States after a final 

administrative order is entered. 

(4) Amends 8 CFR 287.5(e)(2) to 

revise the list of officers authorized to 

issue an administrative Warrant of 

Arrest for immigration violations. 

Administrative Procedure Act 

This rule relates to agency 

organization and management and is 

exempt from the notice of proposed 

rulemaking and delayed effective date 

requirements of the Administrative 

Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(a). 

Executive Order 12866 

This rule is limited to agency 

organization and management and 

therefore is not a rule as defined by 

Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, a 

regulatory impact analysis is not 

required. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

Because no notice of proposed 

rulemaking is required, the provisions 

of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 

U.S.C. 605(b), do not apply. 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 

This rule is not a major rule as 

defined by section 251 of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of 

1996, 5 U.S.C. 804. This rule will not 

result in an annual effect on the 

economy of $100 million or more; a 

major increase in costs or prices; or 

significant adverse effects on 

competition, employment, investment, 

productivity, innovation, or on the 

ability of United States-based 

companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and 

export markets. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 

1995 

This rule will not result in the 

expenditure by state, local and tribal 

government, in the aggregate, or by the 

private sector of $100 million or more 

in any one year, and it will not 

significantly or uniquely affect small 

governments. Therefore, no actions were 

deemed necessary under the provisions 

of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995. 

Executive Order 13132 

This rule will not have substantial 

direct effects on the States, on the 

relationship between the National 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. Therefore, in 

accordance with section 6 of Executive 

Order 13132, the Department of 

Homeland Security has determined that 

this rule does not have sufficient 

federalism implications to warrant the 

preparation of a federalism summary 

impact statement. 

List of Subjects 

8 CFR Part 236 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Aliens, Immigration, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

8 CFR Part 239 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Aliens, Immigration, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

8 CFR Part 241 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Aliens, Immigration, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

8 CFR Part 287 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Aliens, Immigration, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

■ Accordingly, chapter I of title 8 of the 

Code of Federal Regulations is amended 

as follows: 

PART 236—APPREHENSION AND 

DETENTION OF INADMISSIBLE AND 

DEPORTABLE ALIENS; REMOVAL OF 

ALIENS ORDERED REMOVED 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 236 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a; 8 U.S.C. 

1103, 1182, 1224, 1225, 1226, 1227, 1231, 

1362; 18 U.S.C. 4002, 4013(c)(4); Pub. L. 107–

296, 116 Stat. 2135 (6 U.S.C. 101, et seq.); 8 

CFR part 2. 

■ 2. Section 236.1 is amended by adding 

a new paragraph (g) to read as follows: 

§ 236.1 Apprehension, custody, and 

detention. 

* * * * * 

(g) Notice of custody determination. 

(1) In general. At the time of issuance 

of the notice to appear, or at any time 

thereafter and up to the time removal 

proceedings are completed, an 

immigration official may issue a Form I–

286, Notice of Custody Determination. A 

notice of custody determination may be 

issued by those immigration officials 

listed in 8 CFR 287.5(e)(2) and may be 

served by those immigration officials 

listed in 8 CFR 287.5(e)(3), or other 

officers or employees of the Department 

or the United States who are delegated 

the authority to do so pursuant to 8 CFR 

2.1. 

(2) Cancellation. If after the issuance 

of a notice of custody determination, a 

determination is made not to serve it, 

any official authorized to issue such 

notice may authorize its cancellation. 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 67089 

PART 239—INITIATION OF REMOVAL 

PROCEEDINGS 

■ 3. The authority citation for part 239 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1103, 1221, 1229; Pub. 

L. 107–296, 116 Stat. 2135 (6 U.S.C. 101, et 

seq.); 8 CFR part 2. 

■ 4. Section 239.1 is amended by: 

■ a. Revising paragraphs (a)(37) and 

(a)(38); and by 

■ b. Adding paragraphs (a)(39) through 

(a)(41). 

The revisions and additions read as 

follows: 

§ 239.1 Notice to appear. 

(a) * * * 

* * * * * 

(37) Deputy port directors; 

(38) Supervisory service center 

adjudications officers; 

(39) Unit Chief, Law Enforcement 

Support Center; 

(40) Section Chief, Law Enforcement 

Support Center; or 

(41) Other officers or employees of the 

Department or of the United States who 

are delegated the authority as provided 

by 8 CFR 2.1 to issue notices to appear. 

* * * * * 

PART 241—APPREHENSION AND 

DETENTION OF ALIENS ORDERED 

REMOVED 

■ 5. The authority citation for part 241 

is revised to read as follows: 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a; 8 U.S.C. 

1103, 1182, 1223, 1224, 1225, 1226, 1227, 

1228, 1231, 1251, 1253, 1255, 1330, 1362; 18 

U.S.C. 4002, 4013(c)(4); Pub. L. 107–296, 116 

Stat. 2135 (6 U.S.C. 101, et seq.); 8 CFR part 

2. 

■ 6. Section 241.2 is revised to read as 

follows: 

§ 241.2 Warrant of removal. 

(a) Issuance of a warrant of removal. 

(1) In general. A Form I–205, Warrant of 

Removal, based upon the final 

administrative removal order in the 

alien’s case shall be issued by any of the 

following immigration officials: 

(i) Director, Detention and Removal 

Operations; 

(ii) Deputy Assistant Director, Field 

Operations; 

(iii) Field Office Directors; 

(iv) Deputy Field Office Directors; 

(v) Assistant Field Office Directors; 

(vi) Officers in Charge; 

(vii) Special Agents in Charge; 

(viii) Deputy Special Agents in 

Charge; 

(ix) Associate Special Agents in 

Charge; 

(x) Assistant Special Agents in 

Charge; 

(xi) Group Supervisors; 

(xii) Resident Agents in Charge; 

(xiii) District Field Officers; 

(xiv) Chief Patrol Agents; 

(xv) Deputy Chief Patrol Agents; 

(xvi) Assistant Chief Patrol Agents; 

(xvii) Patrol Agents in Charge; 

(xviii) Unit Chief, Law Enforcement 

Support Center; 

(xix) Section Chief, Law Enforcement 

Support Center; 

(xx) Port Directors; 

(xxi) Deputy Port Directors; 

(xxii) Assistant Port Directors; 

(xxiii) Director, Field Operations; 

(xxiv) Deputy Director, Field 

Operations; 

(xxv) Assistant Director, Field 

Operations; and 

(xxvi) Other officers or employees of 

the Department or the United States 

who are delegated the authority as 

provided in 8 CFR 2.1 to issue Warrants 

of Removal. 

(2) Costs and care during removal. 

The immigration officials listed in 

paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (xxv) of this 

section, and other officers or employees 

of the Department or the United States 

who are delegated the authority as 

provided in 8 CFR 2.1, shall exercise the 

authority contained in section 241 of the 

Act to determine at whose expense the 

alien shall be removed and whether his 

or her mental or physical condition 

requires personal care and attention en 

route to his or her destination. 

(b) Execution of the warrant of 

removal. Any officer authorized by 8 

CFR 287.5(e)(3) to execute 

administrative warrants of arrest may 

execute a warrant of removal. 

PART 287—FIELD OFFICERS; 

POWERS AND DUTIES 

■ 7. The authority citation for part 287 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1103, 1182, 1225, 1226, 

1251, 1252, 1357; Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat. 

2135 (6 U.S.C. 101, et seq.); 8 CFR part 2. 

■ 8. Section 287.5(e)(2) is revised to 

read as follows: 

§ 287.5 Exercise of power by immigration 

officers. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

(2) Issuance of arrest warrants for 

immigration violations. A warrant of 

arrest may be issued by any of the 

following immigration officials who 

have been authorized or delegated such 

authority: 

(i) District directors (except foreign); 

(ii) Deputy district directors (except 

foreign); 

(iii) Assistant district directors for 

investigations; 

(iv) Deputy assistant district directors 

for investigations; 

(v) Assistant district directors for 

deportation; 

(vi) Deputy assistant district directors 

for deportation; 

(vii) Assistant district directors for 

examinations; 

(viii) Deputy assistant district 

directors for examinations; 

(ix) Officers in charge (except foreign); 

(x) Assistant officers in charge (except 

foreign); 

(xi) Chief patrol agents; 

(xii) Deputy chief patrol agents; 

(xiii) Assistant chief patrol agents; 

(xiv) Patrol agents in charge; 

(xv) Assistant patrol agents in charge; 

(xvi) Field operations supervisors; 

(xvii) Special operations supervisors; 

(xviii) Supervisory border patrol 

agents; 

(xix) The Assistant Commissioner, 

Investigations; 

(xx) Institutional Hearing Program 

directors; 

(xxi) Area port directors; 

(xxii) Port directors; 

(xxiii) Deputy port directors; 

(xxiv) Assistant Area port directors; 

(xxv) Supervisory deportation 

officers; 

(xxvi) Supervisory detention and 

deportation officers; 

(xxvii) Group Supervisors; 

(xxviii) Director, Office of Detention 

and Removal Operations; 

(xxix) Special Agents in Charge; 

(xxx) Deputy Special Agents in 

Charge; 

(xxxi) Associate Special Agents in 

Charge; 

(xxxii) Assistant Special Agents in 

Charge; 

(xxxiii) Resident Agents in Charge; 

(xxxiv) Field Office Directors; 

(xxxv) Deputy Field Office Directors; 

(xxxvi) District Field Officers; 

(xxxvii) Supervisory district 

adjudications officers; 

(xxxviii) Supervisory asylum officers; 

(xxxix) Supervisory special agents; 

(xl) Director of investigations; 

(xli) Directors or officers in charge of 

detention facilities; 

(xlii) Directors of field operations; 

(xliii) Deputy or assistant directors of 

field operations; 

(xliv) Unit Chief, Law Enforcement 

Support Center; 

(xlv) Section Chief, Law Enforcement 

Support Center; 

(xlvi) Director, Field Operations; 

(xlvii) Deputy Director, Field 

Operations; 

(xlviii) Assistant Director, Field 

Operations; 

(xlix) Immigration Enforcement 

Agents; or 

67090 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 

(l) Other officers or employees of the 

Department or the United States who 

are delegated the authority as provided 

in 8 CFR 2.1 to issue warrants of arrest. 

* * * * * 

Dated: October 17, 2005. 

Michael Chertoff, 

Secretary of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 05–21980 Filed 11–3–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–10–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Bureau of Prisons 

28 CFR Parts 503, 542, and 543 

[BOP–1136–I] 

RIN 1120–AB36 

Bureau of Prisons Central Office, 

Regional Offices, Institutions, and Staff 

Training Centers: Removal of 

Addresses From Rules 

AGENCY: Bureau of Prisons, Justice. 

ACTION: Interim rule. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the Bureau 

of Prisons (Bureau) removes its rules 

listing the addresses of Bureau facilities 

in each of its regions. We will replace 

these rules with a short description of 

the Bureau’s structure, the address of 

the Bureau’s Central Office, and a 

reference to the Bureau’s internet 

address containing current and 

frequently updated contact information 

on Bureau facilities and Regional 

Offices. This change will enable the 

Bureau to more quickly and accurately 

provide updated contact information to 

members of the public, in light of 

frequently changing circumstances. 

DATES: This rule is effective November 

4, 2005. Please send comments on this 

rulemaking by January 3, 2006. 

ADDRESSES: Our e-mail address is 

BOPRULES@BOP.GOV. Comments 

should be submitted to the Rules Unit, 

Office of General Counsel, Bureau of 

Prisons, 320 First Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20534. You may view 

an electronic version of this rule at 

http://www.regulations.gov. You may 

also comment via the Internet to BOP at 

BOPRULES@BOP.GOV or by using the 

http://www.regulations.gov comment 

form for this regulation. When 

submitting comments electronically you 

must include the BOP Docket No. in the 

subject box. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sarah Qureshi, Office of General 

Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, phone (202) 

307–2105. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In this 

document, the Bureau of Prisons 

removes its rules listing the addresses of 

Bureau facilities in each of its regions. 

We will replace these rules with a short 

description of the Bureau’s structure, 

the address of the Bureau’s Central 

Office, and a reference to the Bureau’s 

Web site containing current and 

frequently updated contact information 

on Bureau facilities and Regional 

Offices. 

This change will enable the Bureau to 

more quickly and accurately provide 

updated contact information to 

members of the public, in light of 

frequently changing circumstances. 

Before 1990, the Bureau published lists 

of the addresses of its facilities as 

Notices in the Federal Register. On July 

23, 1990, we published the list of 

addresses as a federal rule (55 FR 

29990). We amended it in 1991 (56 FR 

31531), 1992 (57 FR 53822), 1993 (58 FR 

44428), and 1998. Frequently changing 

circumstances have made it difficult to 

quickly update the list of addresses. 

Between 1998 (the date this rule was 

last amended) and March, 2005, the 

number of Bureau facilities grew from 

93 to 113. This rule change would allow 

the Bureau to reference our Web site, 

which we can update far more quickly 

and accurately, for the most current 

addresses and other contact information 

of all Bureau facilities. 

Administrative Procedure Act 

The Administrative Procedure Act (5 

U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B)) allows exceptions to 

notice-and-comment rulemaking ‘‘when 

the agency for good cause finds * * * 

that notice and public procedure 

thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, 

or contrary to the public interest.’’

Further, section 553(d) provides an 

exception to the usual requirement of a 

delayed effective date when an agency 

finds ‘‘good cause’’ that the rule be 

made immediately effective. 

This rulemaking is exempt from 

normal notice-and-comment procedures 

because advance notice and public 

comment in this instance is 

unnecessary. This is an administrative 

rule insignificant in impact and 

inconsequential to the public. The rule 

merely eliminates a long list of noncurrent addresses and replaces them 

with a reference to a publicly accessible 

and more accurate source. This 

rulemaking makes no change to any 

rights or responsibilities of the agency 

or any regulated entities. For the same 

reasons, the Bureau finds that ‘‘good 

cause’’ exists to make this rule effective 

upon publication. 

Nevertheless, the Bureau invites 

public comment on this interim rule. 

Executive Order 12866 

This rule falls within a category of 

actions that the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) has determined not 

to constitute ‘‘significant regulatory 

actions’’ under section 3(f) of Executive 

Order 12866 and, accordingly, it was 

not reviewed by OMB. 

Executive Order 13132 

This regulation will not have 

substantial direct effects on the States, 

on the relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. Therefore, under 

Executive Order 13132, we determine 

that this rule does not have sufficient 

federalism implications to warrant the 

preparation of a Federalism Assessment. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

The Director of the Bureau of Prisons, 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 605(b)), reviewed this regulation 

and by approving it certifies that it will 

not have a significant economic impact 

upon a substantial number of small 

entities for the following reasons: This 

rule pertains to the correctional 

management of offenders committed to 

the custody of the Attorney General or 

the Director of the Bureau of Prisons. 

This rule will enable the Bureau to more 

quickly and accurately provide updated 

contact information to members of the 

public and its economic impact is 

limited to the Bureau’s appropriated 

funds. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 

1995 

This rule will not result in the 

expenditure by State, local and tribal 

governments, in the aggregate, or by the 

private sector, of $100,000,000 or more 

in any one year, and it will not 

significantly or uniquely affect small 

governments. Therefore, no actions were 

deemed necessary under the provisions 

of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995. 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 

This rule is not a major rule as 

defined by § 804 of the Small Business 

Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 

1996. This rule will not result in an 

annual effect on the economy of 

$100,000,000 or more; a major increase 

in costs or prices; or significant adverse 

effects on competition, employment, 

investment, productivity, innovation, or 

on the ability of United States-based 

companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and 

export markets.