T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J AC OB HO WAR D, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. B E RN A D E T T E G A M B IN O , L A S heri ff D e p t C h ie f

M e d ic a l O f

f ic e rL A C o u n ty J a il; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 56241 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 1 - c v - 0 5 6 8 9 - J FW - CW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J ohn F . W a l t e r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r25, 2011 ** B efo re: T R O T T , G O U L D , an dR A W L IN S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J a c ob H ow ar d appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng e xc e s s i ve f or c e and de l i be r a t e i ndi f f e r e nc e t o 

# FI LED NO V 02 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 56241 2 h is s e r io u s m e d ic a l n e e d s w h ile ap r e tr ia l d e ta in e e a t L o s A n g e le s C o u n tyJ a il. W e h av e ju risd icti o n u n d er2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r ev iew d e n o v o th e d istrict co u rt’s d i s mi s s a l f

o rf a i l u r e t o e x h au s tu n d e rth e Pr i s o n Li t i g a t i o n Re f o rm A c t , 4 2 U . S. C. § 1 9 9 7 e ( a ) ( “P L R A ” ) . W y at t v . T e rhune , 3 1 5 F .3 d1 1 0 8 , 1 1 1 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . W e r e ve r s e and r e m and. D e f e ndant s have notm e tthe i rbur de n of pr ovi ng tha tH ow ar d’ s a c t i on shou l d b e di sm i ss ed for f ai l ure t o exh austadm i ni strat i ve re m edi es , w here they r e lie do n ad e c lar a tio n b yth e ira tto rn e ys ta tin g th a t s h e r e v ie w e dd o c u m e n ts co n tain ed inh ero ff

ice f il e, ra th erth an co n du ctin g a c o m p lete se ar ch o f th e jail’ s tr a c k in g s y s te m f

o rin m a te g r ie v an c e s an dth e ird is p o s itio n s . Se e i d. a t1116- 17, 11 19 -20 (the P L R A do es no ti m po se a pl ea di ng re qu i re m entbu ta def ense , and an i n co m p l et e reco rdi s i n ad eq u at e t o est ab l i sh n o n ex h au st i o n ). D efen d an t s al so fai l edad eq u at el y t o ad d ress H o w ard ’ s arg u m en t s th ath e d i dn o trecei v e a resp o n se t o h i s e xces si ve force gri evance and thataddi t i on alre m edi es w er e there fore u n a v a ilab le . Se e B r o w n v . V a lo ff , 422 F . 3d 926, 935 ( 9th C i r . 2005) ( c onc l udi ng that“ a pri soner need notpres s on t o exh austfurther l evel s of r evi ew on ce he has [ ] r e c e i ve d a l l ‘ ava i l abl e ’ r e m e di e s ” ) . A c c or di ngl y , w e r e ve r s e the j udgm e nt , and rem an dfo r fu rth er p ro ceed i n g s.10- 56241 3 W e d o n o t c o n s id e rar g u m e n ts r a is e df o rth e f ir s t tim e o n ap p e a l. See P adge t t v . W r i ght , 58 7 F . 3d 98 3, 98 5 n . 2 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( per c uri am ). RE V E RS E D a n d RE MAND E D.