# L_2007156EN.01002801.xml

| 16.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 156/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 156/28

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 13 June 2007

concerning the non-inclusion of carbosulfan in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance

(notified under document number C(2007) 2463)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/415/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (1), and in particular the fourth subparagraph of Article 8(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC provides that a Member State may, during a period of 12 years following the notification of that Directive, authorise the placing on the market of plant protection products containing active substances not listed in Annex I of that Directive that are already on the market two years after the date of notification, while those substances are gradually being examined within the framework of a programme of work. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC provides that a Member State may, during a period of 12 years following the notification of that Directive, authorise the placing on the market of plant protection products containing active substances not listed in Annex I of that Directive that are already on the market two years after the date of notification, while those substances are gradually being examined within the framework of a programme of work.

| (2) | Commission Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 (2) and (EC) No 703/2001 (3) lay down the detailed rules for the implementation of the second stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and establish a list of active substances to be assessed with a view to their possible inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. That list includes carbosulfan. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 (2) and (EC) No 703/2001 (3) lay down the detailed rules for the implementation of the second stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and establish a list of active substances to be assessed with a view to their possible inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. That list includes carbosulfan.

| (3) | For carbosulfan the effects on human health and the environment have been assessed in accordance with the provisions laid down in Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 and (EC) No 703/2001 for a range of uses proposed by the notifier. Moreover, those regulations designate the Rapporteur Member States which have to submit the relevant assessment reports and recommendations to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in accordance with Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 451/2000. For carbosulfan the Rapporteur Member State was Belgium and all relevant information was submitted on 11 August 2004. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

For carbosulfan the effects on human health and the environment have been assessed in accordance with the provisions laid down in Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 and (EC) No 703/2001 for a range of uses proposed by the notifier. Moreover, those regulations designate the Rapporteur Member States which have to submit the relevant assessment reports and recommendations to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in accordance with Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 451/2000. For carbosulfan the Rapporteur Member State was Belgium and all relevant information was submitted on 11 August 2004.

| (4) | The assessment report has been peer reviewed by the Member States and the EFSA within its Working Group Evaluation and presented to the Commission on 28 July 2006 in the format of the EFSA conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance carbosulfan (4). This report has been reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 24 November 2006 in the format of the Commission review report for carbosulfan. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The assessment report has been peer reviewed by the Member States and the EFSA within its Working Group Evaluation and presented to the Commission on 28 July 2006 in the format of the EFSA conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance carbosulfan (4). This report has been reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 24 November 2006 in the format of the Commission review report for carbosulfan.

| (5) | During the evaluation of this active substance, a number of concerns have been identified. The use of carbosulfan leads to the appearance of metabolites which have a hazardous profile. This leads to concerns about the exposure of consumers and the possible risk of ground water contamination. However, the data lodged by the notifier within the legal deadlines did not allow these concerns to be resolved. Furthermore, technical material (that is, the active substance as sold in the market) contains relevant impurities, of which at least one (N-nitrosodibutylamine) is carcinogenic. This impurity is found in the technical material at levels which raise concerns. The data lodged by the notifier within the legal deadlines did not provide sufficient information to resolve these concerns. As a result, the risk to operators could not be assessed adequately. Finally, the data lodged by the notifier within the legal deadlines did not adequately address the risks to birds and mammals, aquatic organisms, bees, non-target arthropods, earthworms, and non-target soil micro-organisms and plants. Therefore, concerns remain as regards the risk assessment for these species. Consequently, it was not possible to conclude on the basis of the information available that carbosulfan met the criteria for inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

During the evaluation of this active substance, a number of concerns have been identified. The use of carbosulfan leads to the appearance of metabolites which have a hazardous profile. This leads to concerns about the exposure of consumers and the possible risk of ground water contamination. However, the data lodged by the notifier within the legal deadlines did not allow these concerns to be resolved. Furthermore, technical material (that is, the active substance as sold in the market) contains relevant impurities, of which at least one (N-nitrosodibutylamine) is carcinogenic. This impurity is found in the technical material at levels which raise concerns. The data lodged by the notifier within the legal deadlines did not provide sufficient information to resolve these concerns. As a result, the risk to operators could not be assessed adequately. Finally, the data lodged by the notifier within the legal deadlines did not adequately address the risks to birds and mammals, aquatic organisms, bees, non-target arthropods, earthworms, and non-target soil micro-organisms and plants. Therefore, concerns remain as regards the risk assessment for these species. Consequently, it was not possible to conclude on the basis of the information available that carbosulfan met the criteria for inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.

| (6) | The Commission invited the notifier to submit its comments on the results of the peer review and on its intention or not to further support the substance. The notifier submitted its comments which have been carefully examined. However, despite the arguments put forwards by the notifier, the concerns identified could not be eliminated, and assessments made on the basis of the information submitted and evaluated during the EFSA expert meetings have not demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing carbosulfan satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

The Commission invited the notifier to submit its comments on the results of the peer review and on its intention or not to further support the substance. The notifier submitted its comments which have been carefully examined. However, despite the arguments put forwards by the notifier, the concerns identified could not be eliminated, and assessments made on the basis of the information submitted and evaluated during the EFSA expert meetings have not demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing carbosulfan satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.

| (7) | Carbosulfan should therefore not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

Carbosulfan should therefore not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.

| (8) | Measures should be taken to ensure that authorisations granted for plant protection products containing carbosulfan are withdrawn within a fixed period of time and are not renewed and that no new authorisations for such products are granted. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

Measures should be taken to ensure that authorisations granted for plant protection products containing carbosulfan are withdrawn within a fixed period of time and are not renewed and that no new authorisations for such products are granted.

| (9) | Any period of grace granted by a Member State for the disposal, storage, placing on the market and use of existing stocks of plant protection products containing carbosulfan should be limited to 12 months in order to allow existing stocks to be used in one further growing season. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

Any period of grace granted by a Member State for the disposal, storage, placing on the market and use of existing stocks of plant protection products containing carbosulfan should be limited to 12 months in order to allow existing stocks to be used in one further growing season.

| (10) | This decision does not prejudice the submission of an application for carbosulfan according to the provisions of Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC in view of a possible inclusion in its Annex I. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

This decision does not prejudice the submission of an application for carbosulfan according to the provisions of Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC in view of a possible inclusion in its Annex I.

| (11) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
| --- | --- |

(11)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Carbosulfan shall not be included as active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.

Article 2

Member States shall ensure that:

| (a) | authorisations for plant protection products containing carbosulfan are withdrawn by 13 December 2007; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

authorisations for plant protection products containing carbosulfan are withdrawn by 13 December 2007;

| (b) | no authorisations for plant protection products containing carbosulfan are granted or renewed from the date of publication of this Decision. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

no authorisations for plant protection products containing carbosulfan are granted or renewed from the date of publication of this Decision.

Article 3

Any period of grace granted by Member States in accordance with the provisions of Article 4(6) of Directive 91/414/EEC, shall be as short as possible and shall expire on 13 December 2008 at the latest.

Article 4

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 June 2007.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2007/31/EC (OJ L 140, 1.6.2007, p. 44).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 55, 29.2.2000, p. 25. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1044/2003 (OJ L 151, 19.6.2003, p. 32).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 98, 7.4.2001, p. 6.

3

(4)  EFSA Scientific Report (2006) 91, 1-84, Conclusion on the peer review of carbosulfan.

4

---