alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 20, 2018 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-18-01022-CV ZACHARIAH C. MANNING, Appellant V. DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-05980 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, J ustice Evans, and Justice Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright This Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal as it a ppeared the notice of appeal was untimely. We instructed appellant to file a letter brief e xplaining how this Court has jurisdiction over the appeal and cautioned him that failure to do so may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice . Appellant failed to comply. When a timely post-judgment motion extending the appellate time table is filed, a notice of appeal is due 90 days, or with an extension motion, 105 days, a fter the date the judgment is signed.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.1(a); 26.3. Without a timely filed notice of appeal, thi s Court lacks jurisdiction. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.1(b). The trial court signed the a ppealed orders on May 18, 2018. Ap pellant filed a timely motion to reconsider on May 30, 2018. Accordingly, the notice of appeal was due on August 16,–2– 2018 or, with an extension motion, August 31, 2018. See id . 26.1; 26.3. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on September 5, 2018. Because the notice of appeal w as untimely, this Court lacks jurisdiction. We dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a), (c).

181022F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
ZACHARIAH C. MANNING, Appellant
No. 05-18-01022-CV V.
DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-05980. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Evans and Brown participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appe al is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT recover its costs of this appeal from a ppellant ZACHARIAH C. MANNING.
Judgment entered December 20, 2018.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5368 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5368

   To amend titles 5 and 39 of the United States Code to make Postal 
  Inspectors eligible for availability pay for criminal investigators.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2010

  Mr. Lynch introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend titles 5 and 39 of the United States Code to make Postal 
  Inspectors eligible for availability pay for criminal investigators.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States Postal Service Postal 
Inspectors Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR AVAILABILITY PAY.

    (a) In General.--Section 5545a of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(l) The provisions of subsections (a)-(h) providing for 
availability pay shall apply to a Postal Inspector. For the purpose of 
this section, section 5542(d) of this title, and section 13(a)(16) and 
(b)(30) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 213(a)(16) 
and (b)(30)), a Postal Inspector shall be deemed to be a criminal 
investigator as defined in this section. For purposes of this 
subsection, the term `Postal Inspector' has the meaning given such term 
under section 1003(c) of title 39.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 410(b)(11) of title 39, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``Section 5520a'' and inserting 
``Sections 5520a and 5545a''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.3


CERTIFICATION OF


PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Franz Fink, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Maxwell Technologies, Inc.; and


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








April 28, 2017/S/    FRANZ FINKFranz FinkPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of River RockEntertainment Authority (the “Authority”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officersdoes hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officers knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Authority.

 
| By:                     | /s/ DAVID FENDRICK     |   |
|-------------------------|------------------------|--------|
| David Fendrick          |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| May 17, 2010       |
|                    |
| By:                     | /s/ JOSEPH R. CALLAHAN |   |
| Joseph R. Callahan      |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| May 17, 2010       |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the River Rock Entertainment Authorityand will be retained by the Authority and furnished to the SEC or its staffupon request.

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ANDREW CARLTON LIKE

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00014

- C R

Appeal from the

451st Judicial District Court

of Kendall County, Texas

(TC# 8055 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDE RED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2023.

L ISA J. SOTO

, Justice

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5227 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5227

 To amend title 46, United States Code, to require delivery by United 
States mail of any transportation security card issued to an individual 
                   who resides in a remote location.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 2010

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 46, United States Code, to require delivery by United 
States mail of any transportation security card issued to an individual 
                   who resides in a remote location.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TWIC Delivery Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. DELIVERY OF TRANSPORTATION SECURITY CARDS TO INDIVIDUALS WHO 
              RESIDE IN REMOTE LOCATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 70105(b) of title 46, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3) In the case of a transportation security card issued under 
this section to an individual who resides in a location where the 
nearest transportation security card enrollment center is not 
accessible by a State or Federal road or is more than 100 miles from 
the location, the Secretary shall deliver the card to the individual by 
United States mail.''.
    (b) Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to a transportation security card issued after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 23 (Friday, February 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6006-6007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2149]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Rescission of Order of 
Revocation

    Notice is hereby given that the Order revoking the following 
license is being rescinded by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant 
to sections 14 and 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) 
and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of 
Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.
    License Number: 018391N.
    Name: LCL Cargo Services Inc.
    Address: 8100 NW., 29th Street, Miami, FL 33122.

[[Page 6007]]

    Order Published: FR: 12/22/04 (Volume 69, No. 245, Pg. 76766).

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
 Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 05-2149 Filed 2-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Back to Contents

**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of River Rock Entertainment Authority (the “Authority”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yuan Fang (Yvonne) Mao, Chief Financial Officer of the Authority, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Authority.

By:  /s/ Yuan Fang (Yvonne) MaoYuan Fang (Yvonne) MaoChief Financial OfficerMay 12, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the River Rock Entertainment Authority and will be retained by the River Rock Entertainment Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Banknote Corporation (the
Company ) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Steven G. Singer, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                                      /s/ Steven G. Singer
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Steven G. Singer
                                                      Chairman and Chief
                                                      Executive Officer

Date: November 14, 2003

                                       42
## St at e of Ne w York Supre me Court , Appe llat e D i vi s i on T h i rd J udi cial D e

part me n t Decided and Entered: January 19, 2017 D -7-17

___________________________________ In the Matter of MANDY HUAY-YI HU, an Attorney. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION (Attorney Registration No. 4866679)

___________________________________ Calendar Date: January 11, 2017 Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Rose, Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________ Mandy Huay-Yi Hu, Burlingame, California, pro se. Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

__________
Per Curiam. Mandy Huay-Yi Hu was admitted to practice by this Court in 2010 and lists a business address in Burlingame, California with the Office of Court Administration. Hu now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a]). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department advises that it does not oppose Hu's application. Upon reading the affidavit of Hu sworn to August 11, 2016, and upon reading the correspondence in response by the Chief Attorney for the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined that Hu is eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons, we grant her application and accept her resignation.-2- D-7-17

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Rose, Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that Mandy Huay-Yi Hu's application to resign is granted and her nondisciplinary resignation is accepted; and it is further ORDERED that Mandy Huay-Yi Hu's name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court (see generally Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [b]); and it is further ORDERED that Mandy Huay-Yi Hu shall, within 30 days of the date of this decision, surrender to the Office of Court Administration any Attorney Secure Pass issued to her.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1607-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1607-DR), dated September 24, 2005, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

October 18, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 24, 2005: 

St. Tammany Parish for Individual Assistance (already designated for debris removal and emergency protective measures [Categories A and B] under the Public Assistance program, including direct Federal assistance.) 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

R. David Paulison, 

Acting Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 05-21506 Filed 10-27-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
Opinion issued March 10, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals
For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 15
- 00125
- CV

——————————— IN RE MARCELLE GUIMA RAES , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION On February 11, 2015, relator, Marcelle Guimaraes, filed a petition for writ
of mandamus. 1 On February 24, 2015, Guimaraes filed an unopposed “Motion to
Dismiss her Petition for Writ of Mand amus on Sanctions.” No opinion has issued. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss relator’s petition for writ of

1 The underlying case is In the Matter of the Marriage of Marcelle Guimaraes and Christopher Scott Brann and In the Interest of [N.S.B.], a Child , cause number 2012

- 53837, pending in th e 308th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Hon. James Lombardino presiding.2

mandamus. Cf. T EX

. R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss any other pending motions

as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of South Texas
Oil Company (the "Company") for the quarter ended  September 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission  on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,  Murray  N. Conradie, President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
as adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


   (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));  and

   (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations of the
      Company.


                                  /s/ Murray N. Conradie
                                  ----------------------
                                  Murray N. Conradie,
                                  President, Chairman and Director
                                  (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 16, 2007
[No. 24198.

Department One.

November 14, 1932.]

#### *In the Matter of the Estate of*Frank Perry Hall, Deceased.2

*H. E. Foster,*for appellant.

*J. 7. C. Kellogg, Wingate & Suffel, Jay C. Allen,*and *Peters, Evans <& McLaren,*for respondents.

2

Reported in 15 P. (2d) 938.

Mitchell, J.

— In the course of administration of the estate of Prank Perry Hall, deceased, in the superior court for King county, W. E. G. Suffel, as administrator with the will annexed, presented his final account and petition for distribution. It came on for hearing on April 26, 1932, and was approved. The order of approval also *697directed specified distributions of property to the legatees, including Jennie Crawford. The state inheritance tax not having been adjusted at that time, a certain amount of the funds of the estate was ordered withheld to meet that tax, and the order further provided that, upon the adjustment of the inheritance tax, a further and supplemental report be made.

The inheritance tax was adjusted and approved, as shown by a supplemental report that further showed a small balance still due the legatees. An order was entered on the supplemental report, approving the settlement of the inheritance tax and directing the balance of the funds on hand to be distributed among the legatees. This order was dated June 18, 1932.

On June 16, 1932, Jennie Crawford, one of the legatees, filed a petition for an order vacating the order approving the final account. The petition was denied, and an order to that effect was entered July 1,1932.

Thereafter, July 11, 1932, she served and filed a written notice of appeal from the order denying her petition to vacate the order of April 26, 1932, approving the final account of the administrator; also from the order approving the adjustment of the inheritance tax; and also from the order approving the supplemental and final report of the administrator and directing distribution of the remaining funds in his hand's.

Upon the assignments of error, it is claimed that proper notice of the hearing of the final account on April 26, 1932, was not given, and that the amount distributed to the appellant was not sufficient. But the record shows that she and her attorney of record at that time were present, took a part in the hearing, by written endorsement of her attorney approved the order; and that, at the same time, she was given the full amount distributed to her, for which she-personally signed a receipt that was filed in the cause on that date. There is nothing in the record to show that the amount she received was in any way incorrect or insufficient.

The record further shows that the order approving and settling the inheritance tax and directing it to be paid, and further fixing the final balance to be distributed to the appellant and other legatees, was prepared and presented to the court by her own attorney of record at that time, acting with an attorney for other legatees.

Nothing is shown in the record against the correctness of the account of the administrator, nor in other respects that justifies any complaint by the appellant.

Affirmed.

Tolman, C. J., Holcomb, Parker, and Millard, JJ., concur.