alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2007301EN.01002701.xml

| 20.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 301/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 301/27

---

COUNCIL JOINT ACTION 2007/744/CFSP

of 19 November 2007

amending and extending Joint Action 2006/623/CFSP on the establishment of an EU team to contribute to the preparations of the establishment of a possible International Civilian Office in Kosovo, including a European Union Special Representative component (ICO/EUSR Preparation Team)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and, in particular Article 14 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 15 September 2006 the Council adopted Joint Action 2006/623/CFSP (1) which expires on 30 November 2007. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 15 September 2006 the Council adopted Joint Action 2006/623/CFSP (1) which expires on 30 November 2007.

| (2) | The mandate of the ICO/EUSR Preparation Team should be amended and extended until 31 March 2008, or 30 days after the appointment of the ICR/EUSR, if this occurs before 1 March 2008. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of the ICO/EUSR Preparation Team should be amended and extended until 31 March 2008, or 30 days after the appointment of the ICR/EUSR, if this occurs before 1 March 2008.

| (3) | Joint Action 2006/623/CFSP should be extended and amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Joint Action 2006/623/CFSP should be extended and amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS JOINT ACTION:

Article 1

Joint Action 2006/623/CFSP is hereby extended until 31 March 2008, subject to Article 3 of this Joint Action.

Article 2

The financial reference amount of EUR 3 551 000 as set out in Article 9(1) of Joint Action 2006/623/CFSP shall be increased by EUR 1 692 000 in order to cover the expenditure related to the mandate of the ICO/EUSR Preparation Team from 1 December 2007 to 31 March 2008.

Article 3

Article 14(2) of Joint Action 2006/623/CFSP shall be replaced by the following:

‘2.   It shall expire on 31 March 2008, or 30 days after the appointment of the ICR/EUSR, if this occurs before 1 March 2008.’.

Article 4

This Joint Action shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Article 5

This Joint Action shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 19 November 2007.

For the Council

The President

L. AMADO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 253, 16.9.2006, p. 29. Joint Action as last extended by Joint Action 2007/517/CFSP (OJ L 190, 21.7.2007, p. 38).

1

---
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

J.S., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, SAN FRANCISCO 

PROCESSING & DISTRIBUTION CENTER, 

San Francisco, CA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0066

Issued: November 21, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. MCGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On October 18, 2022 appellant filed an appeal from a November 3, 2020 merit decision

of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 23-0066.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act.1 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance 

of OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the November 3, 2020 decision was May 2, 2021. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until October 18, 2022, more than 180 days after the

November 3, 2020 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 23-0066 is 

untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e).
2

explained his failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to 

establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP 

within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed 

as No. 23-0066, must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-0066 is dismissed.

Issued: November 21, 2022

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id.

at § 501.6(d).
EXHIBIT 32.a

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                           18 U.S.C. 1350,

                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regent Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, David A. Nelson, in my capacity as Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 23, 2007                  /S/ DAVID A. NELSON
                                      -------------------
                                      David A. Nelson, Chief Executive
                                      Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT      TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION      1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT      TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the                Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition                and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Signature: | /s/                Steven G.                Rolls                                                  |
|--------|------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |       | Steven                G.                RollsChief                Financial                Officer |

|   | Date: | May              12,              2008 |
|--------|-------|----------------------------------------|
# C_2007172EN.01000301.xml

| 25.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4673 — DB/STRABAG Invest)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 172/02)

On 6 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4673. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4673. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

W.B, Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, ABERDEEN 

PROVING GROUND, Aberdeen, MD, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0260

Issued: February 3, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Analese B. Dunn, Esq., for the appellant1

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On December 14, 2022 appellant, through counsel, filed an appeal from an April 2, 2021

merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the 

Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 23-0260.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act.2 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance 

of OWCP’s decision.3

1

In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for 

legal or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 20 C.F.R.

§ 501.9(e). No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board. Id. An 

attorney or representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, subject 

to fine or imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also 18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of fees to a 

representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation.

2 5 U.S.C. § 8101, et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

3 20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e).
2

The 180th day following the April 2, 2021 decision was September 29, 2021. As 

appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until December 14, 2022, more than 180 days 

after the April 2, 2021 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 23-0260

is untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not 

offered a reason to explain the failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation 

sufficient to establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision 

issued by OWCP within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the 

appeal docketed as No. 23-0260, must be dismissed.4 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-0260 is dismissed.

Issued: February 3, 2023

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees' Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees' Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees' Compensation Appeals Board

4 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id. 

at § 501.6(d).
**EXHIBIT 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The Significant subsidiaries of Sears, Roebuck and Co.,the names under which such subsidiaries do business, and the states orcountries in which each was organized, were as follows as of December 30,2000:    
Names                                                                                                                                            Place of Organization
Consolidated Subsidiaries:Sears Canada Inc.                                                                                                                        Canada     Sears Acceptance Company Inc.                                                                                         CanadaSears Logistics Services, Inc.                                                                                                    DelawareSears National Bank                                                                                                                    United StatesSRFG, Inc.                                                                                                                                     DelawareSears Roebuck Acceptance Corp.                                                                                            Delaware
103 other companies                                                                                                                    Various  
The Company owns 20% to 50% of the outstanding votingsecurities of 35 companies, which are accounted for on the equity method.
The Company has investments in a number of other corporationsrepresenting substantial percentages (but not more than 20 percent) oftheir outstanding capital stock. The Company disclaims control of any suchcompanies.

**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
STATEMENT  OF  CONSOLIDATED  INCOME AND RETAINED  EARNINGS AND THE  STATEMENT OF
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL CONDITION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                            1,000

<S>                                                     <C>


<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               OCT-31-2001<F1>
<PERIOD-END>                                    JAN-31-2001
<CASH>                                                   81,800
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           821,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                             (8,800)
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              0
<PP&E>                                                   12,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                           (7,600)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        2,085,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         0
<BONDS>                                               1,671,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                171,000
<OTHER-SE>                                              146,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          2,085,800
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         85,300
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            12,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         15,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          6,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       30,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          20,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                             (8,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      12,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                             12,800
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0
<FN>
<F1>
THE CORPORATION'S  STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION IS UNCLASSIFIED;  THEREFORE,
THE  DISTINCTION  BETWEEN  CURRENT AND LONG-TERM  ASSETS AND  LIABILITIES IS NOT
AVAILABLE
</FN>



</TABLE>
# C_2007092EN.01000101.xml

| 27.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4469 — Scholz/Voestalpine/Scholz Austria)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 92/01)

On 22 March 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4469. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4469. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

CECILE FOY GSANGER NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

August 31, 2015

Hon. Steve Wiggins

District Attorney`s Office

1001 Pearl Street

Beaumont, TX 77701

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL * Hon. Lance P. Bradley

McPherson, Hughes, Bradley, Wimberley

3120 Central Mall Drive

Port Arthur, TX 77642

* DELIVERED VIA E

- M AIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 14

- 00188

- CV

Tr.Ct.No. B

- 191,390

Style: Jefferson County Constables Association v. Jefferson County, Texas

The above

- referenced cause has been set for submission without oral argument

on Monday, September 21, 2015, before a panel consisting of Chief Justice Rogelio

Valdez, Justice Nelda V. Rodriguez and Justice Gregory T. Perkes.

Very truly yours,

Cecile Foy Gsanger, Clerk

CFG:ch
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




              We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 1) for the period ended December 31, 1995, and to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File
Nos. 2-77496 and 33-10631) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-02001) of our report dated
March 20, 1996 (except Note 1 which date is April 24, 1996 and Note 19 which
date is November 13, 1996) on our audits of the consolidated balance sheets of
International Remote Imaging Systems, Inc. and subsidiary, as of December 31,
1995 and 1994, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995.


/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Los Angeles, California
December 31, 1996
# C_2007133EN.01000201.xml

| 15.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4588 — Petroplus/Coryton Refinery Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 133/03)

On 26 April 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4588. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4588. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
#### STATE v. CHANCE

No. 20 PC.

Case below: 3 N.C. App. 459.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 March 1969.