alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

M.G., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

WEST LOS ANGELES VA MEDICAL 

CENTER, Los Angeles, CA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 22-1380

Issued: October 26, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On September 20, 2022 appellant filed an appeal from a September 22, 2021 merit 

decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the 

Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 22-1380.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act (FECA).

1

 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the 

Board’s review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of 

issuance of OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the September 22, 2021 decision was March 21, 2022. As 

appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until September 20, 2022, more than 180 days 

after the September 22, 2021 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 

22-1380 is untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has 

not explained her failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e).
2

establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP 

within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed 

as No. 22-1380, must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 22-1380 is dismissed.

Issued: October 26, 2022

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id.

at § 501.6(d).
Webb 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 21, 2015

No. 04-14-00275-CV

Adriana P. PEREZ,

Appellant

v.

WEBB COUNTY,

Appellee

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CVT000305 D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting1

: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Webb County filed a motion for en banc reconsideration of the panel’s decision. A 

majority of the en banc court having failed to vote in favor of the motion, the motion is denied. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.2, 49.7.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

 1 Justice Patricia O. Alvarez recuses herself from this proceeding. 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, Public Law 95-541.

# SUMMARY:

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the required notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 775, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On September 19, 2005, the National Science Foundation published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     of permit applications received. A permit was issued on October 24, 2005, to: Molly F. Miller, Permit No. 2006-022.                

Nadene G. Kennedy,

Permit Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-21564 Filed 10-27-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73
          - [DA 05-2694; MM Docket No. 01-188, RM-10203]

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; dismissal.

# SUMMARY:

The Audio Division, at the request of Charles Crawford, the proponent of a petition for rule making to allot Channel 243A at Evant, Texas, 66 FR 44588 (August 24, 2001), dismisses the petition for rule making and terminates the proceeding.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Deborah Dupont, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This is a synopsis of the Commission's                     *Report and Order*, MM Docket No. 01-188, adopted October 12, 2005, and released October 14, 2005. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-257, Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision also                           ( print page 66331)                        may be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, (800) 378-3160, or via the company's Web site,                     *http://www.bcpiweb.com.*                     The                     *Report and Order*                     is not subject to the Congressional Review Act, and therefore the Commission will not send a copy of it in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office,                     *see*                     U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).                

Federal Communications Commission.

John A. Karousos,

Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 05-21554 Filed 11-1-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                       EXHIBIT 4


                   NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION CORP.
                          AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
                   -------------------------------------------
                 INSTRUMENTS DEFINING RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS
                              INCLUDING INDENTURES


     The following  instruments of Navistar  International  Transportation Corp.
and its principal subsidiary Navistar Financial  Corporation defining the rights
of security holders are incorporated herein by reference.

         4.1    Indenture,   dated  as  of  March  1,  1968,   between  Navistar
                International  Transportation  Corp. and  Manufacturers  Hanover
                Trust Company, as Trustee, and succeeded by FIDATA Trust Company
                of New York,  as  successor  Trustee,  for 6 1/4%  Sinking  Fund
                Debentures due 1998 for  $50,000,000.  Filed on Registration No.
                2-28150.

         4.2    Indenture,   dated  as  of  June  15,  1974,   between  Navistar
                International  Transportation Corp. and Harris Trust and Savings
                Bank,  as Trustee,  and  succeeded by Commerce  Union Bank,  now
                known as Sovran Bank/Central South, as successor Trustee, for 9%
                Sinking  Fund  Debentures  due 2004 for  $150,000,000.  Filed on
                Registration No. 2-51111.

         4.3    Indenture,  dated as of  November  15,  1993,  between  Navistar
                Financial  Corporation  and Bank of America,  Illinois  formerly
                known as Continental Bank, National Association, as Trustee, for
                8 7/8%  Senior  Subordinated  Notes  due 1998 for  $100,000,000.
                Filed on Registration No. 33-50541.

         4.4    Indenture,  dated as of May 30,  1997,  by and between  Navistar
                Financial  Corporation  and The Fuji Bank and Trust Company,  as
                Trustee,   for  9%  Senior   Subordinated  Notes  due  2002  for
                $100,000,000. Filed on Registration No. 333-30167.


======

    Instruments  defining the rights of holders of other unregistered  long-term
debt of Transportation  and its subsidiaries have been omitted from this exhibit
index because the amount of debt  authorized  under any such instrument does not
exceed  10%  of  the  total  assets  of  the  Registrant  and  its  consolidated
subsidiaries.  The Registrant agrees to furnish a copy of any such instrument to
the Commission upon request.




                                       E-2
#### HARGROVE v. PLUMBING AND HEATING SERVICE

No. 102 PC

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 1.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 21 December 1976.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #10178 and #10179] 

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 3. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-1604-DR), dated 08/29/2005. 

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Katrina.                     

*Incident Period:*                         08/29/2005 through 10/14/2005.                     

# Effective Date:

10/20/2005. 

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         01/11/2006.                     

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/29/2006.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: Small Business Administration, National Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Mississippi, dated 08/29/2005, is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a result of this disaster to 01/11/2006. 

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) 

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 05-21677 Filed 10-31-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
II 

Calendar No. 443 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5551 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2010 

Received and read the first time 

JUNE 25, 2010 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to make a certification when making purchases under the Small Business 

Lending Fund Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTIFICATION UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS 

4 LENDING FUND PROGRAM. 

5 Before the Secretary of the Treasury makes the first 

6 purchase (including a commitment to purchase) under the 

7 Small Business Lending Fund Program under the Small 

8 Business Jobs and Credit Act of 2010, the Secretary shall 

9 certify, under oath, to the Inspector General of the DeVerDate Mar 15 2010 21:09 Jun 25, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5551.PCS H5551

jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5551 PCS

1 partment of the Treasury, with a copy to the Comptroller 

2 General of the United States, that the purchase-decision 

3 process has been designed so that each purchase decision 

4 is made solely on the basis of economic fundamentals and 

5 not because of any political considerations. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 23, 2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS

jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 443 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5551 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to make 

Small Business Lending Fund Program. a certification when making purchases under the 

JUNE 25, 2010 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
# C_2007116EN.01000601.xml

| 26.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4608 — Siemens/UGS Corporation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 116/03)

On 27 April 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4608. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4608. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
#### A. G. DONDERO, Executive Director, Employment Security Department of the State of Nevada, Appellant, v. MAYNARD F. PRICE and M & F, INC., Doing Business as CHARLESTON PLAZA BARBER SHOP, Respondent.

No. 7425

July 10, 1975

537 P.2d 318

*John A. Flangas,*Carson City, for Appellant.

*Tad Porter,*Las Vegas, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

The judgment in this case is reversed for the same reasons we delineated in Kitchen Factors, Inc. v. Brown, 91 Nev. 308, *443535 P.2d 677 (1975), and the determination of the Employment Security Department is hereby affirmed.

In accord with NRS 18.060, appellant will be allowed his costs on appeal, upon the proper filing of a cost bill.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Each of the undersigned, Alan J. Lacy, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Sears, Roebuck and Co. (the Company), and Glenn R. Richter, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, has executed this certification in connection
with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys annual report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2005 (the Report). Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. February 23, 2005 /s/Alan J. Lacy
Alan J. Lacy
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President and Chief Executive Officer  /s/Glenn R. Richter
Glenn R. Richter
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________**
No. 22

- 60489 Summary Calendar

**____________ J. Guadalupe Solache Galarza,** 

Petitioner **,**

versus
**Merrick Garland,** U.S. Attorney General **,** Respondent

**.**

**______________________________** Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Agency No. A091 244 973

**______________________________**
Before **Jones, Haynes,** and **Oldham,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *****
J. Guadalupe Solache Galarza , a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen. We lack jurisdiction to consider Solache
Galarza ’s challenge to the discretionary decision not to reopen his

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 11, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-60489 Document: 00516747738 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/11/2023No. 22

- 60489

2 proceedings sua sponte. See Mejia v. Whitaker , 913 F.3d 482, 490 (5th
Cir. 2019)

. Jurisdiction does exist to review Solache Galarza ’s arguments to the extent that he asserts that his due process rights were violated as he is no longer removable as charged

. See id. However, his due process arguments are unavailing and not cognizable because “no liberty interest exists in a
motion to reo pen.” Id.

Solache Galarza ’s petition is **DISMISSED** in part for lack of jurisdiction and **DENIED** in part. Additionally, the Government’s motion
to dismiss is **DENIED** as moot. Case: 22-60489 Document: 00516747738 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/11/2023
EXHIBIT 11.1
                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                                                        Years Ended December 31,
                                                        1995      1994      1993
                                                        ----      ----      ----
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

PRIMARY

    Average shares outstanding                        11,480    10,623     8,782

    Net effect of dilutive stock options--
       based on the treasury stock method
       using average market price                        473       229       200
                                                         ---       ---       ---

                                            TOTAL     11,953    10,852     8,982
                                                      ======    ======     =====

Income from continuing operations                     $8,451    $5,949    $3,896
                                                      ------    ------    ------
Net income                                            $8,451    $5,949    $3,896
                                                       =====    ======    ======

Income per share:
    Continuing operations                               $.71    $  .55    $  .43
                                                        ----     -----      ----
Net income                                              $.71    $  .55    $  .43
                                                         ===      ====      ====

FULLY DILUTED

    Average shares outstanding                        11,480    10,623     8,782

    Neteffect of dilutive stock options--  
    based on the treasury  stock method
    using the year-end market price, if 
    higher than the average market price                 496       229       236
                                                         ---       ---       ---

                                            TOTAL     11,976    10,852     9,018
                                                      ======    ======     =====

Income from continuing operations                     $8,451    $5,949    $3,896
                                                      ------    ------    ------
Net income                                            $8,451    $5,949    $3,896
                                                       =====    ======    ======

Income per share:
    Continuing operations                               $.71    $  .55    $  .43
                                                        ----      ----      ----
Net income                                              $.71    $  .55    $  .43
                                                         ===     =====      ====


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The  Computation  of Per Share  Earnings for all periods  have been  restated to
reflect the  acquisitions of American  Telcom Corp. of Georgia,  Inc. and Access
West, Inc. in May 1995, each accounted for as a pooling of interests.