alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Ravalli County Resource Advisory Committee will be meeting to discuss 2005 projects elected monitors. The meeting is being held pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393). The meeting is open to the public.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on October 25, 2005, 6:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held at the Ravalli County Administration Building, 215 S. 4th Street, Hamilton, Montana. Send written comments to Dan Ritter, District Manager, Stevensville Ranger District, 88 Main Street, Stevensville, MT 59870, by facsimile (406) 777-7423, or electronically to                         *dritter@fs.fed.us*.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dan Ritter, Stevensville District Ranger and Designated Federal Officer, Phone: (406) 777-5461.

Dated: October 18, 2005.

David T. Bull,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 05-21257 Filed 10-24-05; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### Gary D. ARNOLD, Plaintiff, v. FALCON PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant.

No. 90-2317-TUA.

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, W.D.

July 2, 1990.

Nathan A. Bicks, Burch, Porter & Johnson, Memphis, Tenn., for plaintiff.

Ira L. Blank, Thomas P. Rosenfeld, Pop-kin & Stern, St. Louis, Mo., Albert T. McRae, Wilson, McRae, Ivy, Sevier, McTyier and Strain, Memphis, Tenn., for defendant.

ORDER CONDITIONALLY DENYING MOTION TO REMAND

TURNER, District Judge.

This complaint was initially filed in the Circuit Court of Tennessee where plaintiff sought to recover $45,000.00 in compensatory damages. Punitive damages were not requested. Later, the plaintiff answered interrogatories stating that he was seeking to recover punitive damages, in addition to compensatory damages. The defendant then filed a notice of removal to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446. In the Notice of Removal, defendant asserted that the citizenship of the parties was diverse and the amount in controversy exceeded $50,000.00. The plaintiff has now moved the court to remand the action to the Circuit Court of Tennessee on the basis that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction in that the amount in controversy, as set out in the prayers of the complaint, is only $45,000.00, and that plaintiff is not at this time seeking punitive damages.

The issue here is whether or not an un-pleaded but asserted and sworn claim for punitive damages in addition to the claim for $45,000.00 compensatory damages suffices to satisfy the $50,000.00 amount in controversy necessary for this court’s subject matter jurisdiction. The court answers that issue in the affirmative and holds that the amount in controversy exceeds $50,-000.00. However, in light of the fact that plaintiff has not yet actually sought to amend his complaint to recover punitive damages, the court will allow plaintiff an opportunity to clarify his intent with respect to the recovery of punitive damages. Plaintiff’s motion to remand is therefore conditionally denied as follows:

Plaintiff will be allowed ten (10) days from the entry of this order in which to file with this court an affidavit stating that he is waiving any claim to punitive damages in this action. Should plaintiff elect to file this affidavit, the court will grant the motion to remand and remand this action to the Circuit Court of Tennessee, Thirtieth Judicial District at Memphis, where plaintiff would then be judicially estopped from recovering any punitive damages. Plain*380tiff would not be allowed by the Circuit Court of Tennessee to take one position in this action in an effort to secure remand and defeat defendant’s statutory right of removal and then take another contradictory position in an effort to recover punitive damages in addition to his compensatory damages, the sum of which would reasonably exceed $50,000.00 if plaintiff were successful.

If plaintiff declines to file this affidavit within the time described above, the court’s denial of his motion to remand shall become final and this court will maintain jurisdiction over this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
EXHIBIT 10.4

[nbdi033110_ex10z4002.gif]



---

[nbdi033110_ex10z4004.gif]



---

[nbdi033110_ex10z4006.gif]



---

[nbdi033110_ex10z4008.gif]



---

[nbdi033110_ex10z4010.gif]



---

[nbdi033110_ex10z4012.gif]



---

[nbdi033110_ex10z4014.gif]



---

[nbdi033110_ex10z4016.gif]
# Official Journal L 196/3 Ju

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 196 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 473 June 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 196

English edition

Legislation

Volume 473 June 2004

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1065/2004 of 2 June 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1066/2004 of 1 June 2004 establishing unit values for the determination of the customs value of certain perishable goods | 3 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1067/2004 of 2 June 2004 amending the import duties in the rice sector | 9 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1065/2004 of 2 June 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1066/2004 of 1 June 2004 establishing unit values for the determination of the customs value of certain perishable goods

3

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1067/2004 of 2 June 2004 amending the import duties in the rice sector

9

| | | Acts adopted under Title V of the Treaty on European Union |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Council Common Position 2004/500/CFSP of 17 May 2004 updating Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism and repealing Common Position 2004/309/CFSP | 12 |

Acts adopted under Title V of the Treaty on European Union

*

Council Common Position 2004/500/CFSP of 17 May 2004 updating Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism and repealing Common Position 2004/309/CFSP

12

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
statements for the six month period ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          513,395
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,133,151
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,646,546)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               200,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                200,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (200,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (200,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
# L_2007119EN.01003001.xml

| 9.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 119/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 119/30

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 16 April 2007

establishing the position to be adopted, on behalf of the Community, within the International Grains Council with respect to the extension of the Grains Trade Convention 1995

(2007/317/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133 in conjunction with the second subparagraph of Article 300(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

The Grains Trade Convention 1995 was concluded by the Community by Decision 96/88/EC (1) and was regularly extended for further periods of two years. The Convention was extended last time by decision of the International Grains Council in June 2005 and remains in force until 30 June 2007. A further extension is in the interest of the Community. The Commission, which represents the Community in the International Grains Council, should therefore be authorised to vote in favour of such extension,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Community’s position within the International Grains Council shall be to vote in favour of the extension of the Grains Trade Convention 1995 for a further period of up to two years.

The Commission is hereby authorised to express this position within the International Grains Council.

Done at Luxembourg, 16 April 2007.

For the Council

The President

H. SEEHOFER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 21, 27.1.1996, p. 47.

1

---
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

J.A., Appellant

and

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 

TELESERVICE CENTER, Bellaire, TX,

Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 22-0725

Issued: June 2, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On April 10, 2022 appellant filed an appeal from a February 4, 2021 merit decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 22-0725.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act.1 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance 

of OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the February 4, 2021 decision was August 3, 2021. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until April 10, 2022, more than 180 days after the

February 4, 2021 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 22-0725 is 

untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not offered 

a reason to explain the failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e).
2

to establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by 

OWCP within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal 

docketed as No. 22-0725, must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 22-0725 is dismissed.

Issued: June 2, 2022

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance. ” 

20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d).
*i,j /' /, 82,2)3 "Oi ftpeltfcos-fa -£/e*M awi Aoosta.Cte*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6124

CHARLES STANFIELD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR.; SEWALL SMITH, Warden; THEODORE PURNELL, Chief of Security; PAMELA SORENSEN; LUCILLE BAGLEY; PATRICIA GOINS; D. BRIDELL; JOSEPH ZB OZIEN; WILLIAM FILBERT, Assistant Warden; Francis Edmonds, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-94- 52-L) Submitted: April 30, 1996 Decided: May 30, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Stanfield, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Audrey J. S. Carrion, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court entered its order on December 19, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal was dated January 19, 1996, and filed on January 22, 1996. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extensionof the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          1,979
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 107,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                   10,375
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               99,168
<PP&E>                                        598,095
<DEPRECIATION>                                378,202
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                334,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         166,759
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                    1,223,435
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  334,243
<SALES>                                        16,451
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               16,451
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  11,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  116
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,220
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,536
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,536
<EPS-BASIC>                                   0.002
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.002


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5465 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5465

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 5-year recovery 
              period for computer-based gambling machines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 28, 2010

  Mr. Heller (for himself, Ms. Berkley, and Ms. Titus) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 5-year recovery 
              period for computer-based gambling machines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIVE-YEAR RECOVER PERIOD FOR COMPUTER-BASED GAMBLING 
              MACHINES.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (B) of section 168(e)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``and'' at the end 
of clause (vi)(III), by striking the period at the end of clause (vii) 
and inserting ``, and'', and by adding at the end the following new 
clause:
                            ``(viii) any computer-based gambling 
                        machine, including slot machines and video 
                        lottery terminals.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Jostens, Inc. condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the 
period ended June 28, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to 
such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                   14,369 
<RECEIVABLES>                                 144,740 
<ALLOWANCES>                                    6,237 
<INVENTORY>                                    76,722 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              259,209       
<PP&E>                                        217,790      
<DEPRECIATION>                              (151,999)    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                397,134      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         227,584    
<BONDS>                                         3,876  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                       13,002 
<OTHER-SE>                                    136,962       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  397,134         
<SALES>                                       447,753          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              447,753          
<CGS>                                         210,687          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 210,687          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              152,097       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  832      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              3,144       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                81,825       
<INCOME-TAX>                                   33,548      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            48,277      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                   48,277 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.24 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.24 
        

</TABLE>