alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.4


CERTIFICATION OF


PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2012, I, Kevin S. Royal, Chief Financial Officer of Maxwell Technologies, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


(1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2012, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. at the dates indicated.


This certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.








October 10, 2013/S/    KEVINS. ROYALKevin S. RoyalSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,Treasurer and Secretary(Principal Financial Officer)


A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Maxwell Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Maxwell Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00447-CR

James Eric Grant, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 67168, THE HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant James Eric Grant seeks to appeal from a judgment adjudicating him guilty

of possession of a controlled substance. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42.12, §§ 5(b), 21, 23; Tex.

Health & Safety Code § 482.115. Sentence was imposed on June 6, 2014. No motion for new trial

was filed. Therefore, the deadline for perfecting appeal was July 7, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P.

26.2(a)(1). Appellant filed his notice of appeal on July 17, 2014. No extension of time for filing the

notice of appeal was requested. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Thus, appellant’s notice of appeal, filed

41 days after sentence was imposed, is untimely. Absent a timely filed notice of appeal, we do not

obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal in a criminal case and can take no action other

than to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522–23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Accordingly,

we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: October 31, 2014

Do Not Publish

2
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 207 (Thursday, October 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 61974]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21459]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-7989-6]


College Grove Battery Chip Superfund Site; Notice of Proposed 
Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of cost recovery settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the Environmental 
Protection Agency has offered a cost recovery settlement at the College 
Grove Battery Chip Superfund Site (Site) located in College Grove, 
Williamson/Rutherford Counties, Tennessee. EPA will consider public 
comments on the proposed settlement until November 28, 2005. EPA may 
withdraw from or modify the proposed settlement should such comments 
disclose facts or considerations which indicate the proposed settlement 
is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.
    Copies of the proposed settlement are available from: Ms. Paula V. 
Batchelor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Superfund 
Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Waste Management Division, 
61 Forsyth Street, South West, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, (404) 562-8887, 
E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ecae8d988f848980839ec2bc8d99808daca9bcadc28b839a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="64260510070c01080b164a3405110805242134254a030b12">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Written or e-mail comments may be submitted to Paula V. Batchelor 
at the above address within 30 days of the date of publication.

    Dated: October 12, 2005.
De'Lyntoneus Moore,
Acting Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, 
Waste Management Division.
[FR Doc. 05-21459 Filed 10-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The City of New Rochelle, Respondent, *v.*New Rochelle Coal and Lumber Company, Appellant.

Highways — abandoned when closed for six years.

A highway which has been closed to travel for its entire width for more than six years ceases to be such.

*City of New Rochelle*v. *New Rochelle Coal & Lumber Co.,*173 App. Div. 952, reversed.

(Argued November 19, 1918;

decided November 26, 1918.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 16, 1916, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. The judgment in effect ejected the defendant from the possession of a piece of land in the city of New Rochelle, which piece, of land would be within the lines of Echo avenue, in such city, if continued southerly from Cedar road through the appellant’s property, upon the theory and allegation that such piece of land was and is a public highway, and that the defendant’s conceded possession and occupation of it is an illegal obstruction and incumbrance, constituting a public nuisánce, the relief awarded the respondent being in the form of a mandatory injunction restraining the appellant, its officers, agents, attorneys and servants from occupying the said strip of land.

*Michael J. Tierney*for appellant.

*697
      *Hugh M. Harmer, Mark M. Schlesinger*and *Walter G. C. Otto*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff failed to offer sufficient evidence to sustain a finding that the *locus in quo*was an existing highway. The evidence conclusively establishes that for more than six years prior to the commencement of the action the strip of land in suit had been closed to travel-for its entire width. The obstructed section had, therefore, ceased to be a highway. (Highway Law, § 234; *Barnes*v. *Midland R. R. Terminal Co.,*218 N. Y. 91, 98.)

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

His cock, Ch.- J., Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 211 (Wednesday, November 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 66422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21852]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
submit comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of agreements are 
available through the Commission's Office of Agreements (202-523-5793 
or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fe8a8c9f9a9b9f909f92878d978dbe98939dd0999188"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e29690838687838c838e9b918b91a2848f81cc858d94">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Agreement No.: 009831-023.
    Title: New Zealand/United States Container Lines Association.
    Parties: Australia-New Zealand Direct Line; CP Ships USA, LLC; and 
Hamburg-Sud.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M 
Street NW.; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment removes P&O Nedlloyd Limited as a party to 
the agreement.

    Agreement No.: 011834-002.
    Title: Maersk Sealand/Hapag-Lloyd Mediterranean U.S. East Coast 
Slot Charter Agreement.
    Parties: A.P. Moller Maersk A/S and Hapag-Lloyd Container Linie 
GmbH.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M 
Street NW.; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment expands the range of Spanish ports covered 
by the agreement and adds ports in France to the geographic scope of 
the agreement.

    Dated: October 28, 2005.

    By order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-21852 Filed 11-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 210 (Tuesday, November 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 65900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21860]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES


Sunshine Act Meeting

ACTION: Notice of a Partially Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of 
the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TIME AND PLACE: Friday, November 4, 2005 at 11:30 a.m. The Meeting will 
be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20571.

OPEN AGENDA ITEM: Ex-Im Bank Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee for 
2006.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will be open to public participation 
for Item No. 1 only.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, contact: 
Office of the Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571 
(Tele. No. 202-565-3957).

Howard A. Schweitzer,
General Counsel (Acting).
[FR Doc. 05-21860 Filed 10-28-05; 12:58 pm]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual report on Form 10K of ATEL Capital  Equipment Fund
VIII,  LLC, (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  and
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.   ss.1350,   as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, Dean L. Cash,  Chief  Executive  Officer of ATEL
Financial Services, LLC, managing member of the Company, hereby certify that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:       3/29/2005



 /s/ Dean Cash
----------------------
Dean L. Cash
President and Chief Executive
Officer of Managing Member
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                          24,437
<SECURITIES>                                    28,121
<RECEIVABLES>                                  601,999
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,400
<INVENTORY>                                    399,815
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,103,169
<PP&E>                                       1,816,607
<DEPRECIATION>                                 796,295
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,876,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          916,430
<BONDS>                                        567,516
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,750
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,229,015
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,876,408
<SALES>                                      3,224,944
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,224,944
<CGS>                                        3,121,115
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,121,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,185
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,745
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,899
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,599
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (14,815)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,216)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
# L_2007031EN.01000901.xml

| 6.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 31/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 31/9

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 110/2007

of 5 February 2007

determining the extent to which applications for import rights lodged in respect of the quota for frozen meat of bovine animals, provided for in Regulation (EC) No 704/2006, can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 704/2006 of 8 May 2006 opening and providing for the administration of a tariff quota for frozen meat of bovine animals covered by CN code 0202 and products covered by CN code 0206 29 91 (1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007) (2), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas:

Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 704/2006 fixes at 53 000 tonnes the quantity of the quota in respect of which Community importers can lodge an application for import rights based on the quantities of beef falling under CN code 0201, 0202, 0206 10 95 or 0206 29 91 imported by him/her or on his/her account under the relevant customs provisions, between 1 May 2005 and 30 April 2006. As the import rights applied for exceed the available quantity referred to in Article 1, a reduction coefficient should be fixed in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 704/2006,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Each application for import rights lodged during the month of January 2007 in accordance with Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 704/2006 shall be accepted at a rate of 4,743334 % of the import rights applied for.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 6 February 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 February 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1899/2004 (OJ L 328, 31.10.2004, p. 67).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 122, 9.5.2006, p. 8.

2

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 Date:
    
    August 9, 2005/s/ C. DEAN METROPOULOSC. Dean Metropoulos
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 61
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

R.C., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE,

San Clemente, CA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0069

Issued: November 21, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. MCGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On October 6, 2022 appellant filed an appeal from a March 30, 2022 merit decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 23-0069.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’Compensation Act.1 

For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review 

authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s 

decision.2

The 180th day following the March 30, 2022 decision was September 26, 2022. As 

appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until October 6, 2022,more than 180 days after the

March 30, 2022 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 23-0069 is 

untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not explained 

hisfailure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to establish compelling 

circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e).
2

filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 23-0069, must be 

dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-0069 is dismissed.

Issued: November 21, 2022

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id. at 

§ 501.6(d).
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 211 (Wednesday, November 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66353-66356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21781]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 06-07]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 06-07 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: October 27, 2005.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 66354]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02NO05.044


[[Page 66355]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02NO05.045


[[Page 66356]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02NO05.046

[FR Doc. 05-21781 Filed 11-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Exhibit 10.12


 


Form of Purchase Agreement


 


Purchaser (Party A): 


Supplier (Party B): Wenzhou New Focus Technology & Electronic
Co., Ltd.


 


Contract Number:


Signing at: Wenzhou


Signing date:


 


		1.	Purchase Products and Terms



 


	Name of Product	Model	Unit	Number	Price per unit	Total
	Sine Wave inverter	3000W	Piece	 	 	 
	Sine Wave inverter	2000W	Piece	 	 	 
	Total in RMB:


 


		2.	Place of Receipt:  Wenzhou



		3.	Transportation Method: Self-pickup



		4.	Packaging and fees:  Born by the Purchaser



		5.	Method of payment: Wire payment before delivery



		6.	Delivery time: Within 6 months



		7.	Event of default: By settlement between the parties



		8.	This agreement is made in two copies, one for each copy, and will take effect once Party B received deposit from Party A. If the payment
has not been received beyond the timeframe specified in the Agreement, the Agreement shall be deemed invalid. The Agreement is valid after
stamped copies have been exchanged between the parties by facsimile.



		9.	Agreement validity period: [date], [Month][Year] to [date], [Month][Year]



 


	Supplier 	 	Purchaser	 
	Signature of Legal Representative	 	Signature of Legal Representative	 
	Phone number	 	Phone number	 
	Bank Information	 	Bank Information	 
	Account Number	 	Account Number	 
	Tax Number	 	Tax Number