alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5236 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5236

      To amend SAFETEA-LU to ensure that projects that assist the 
 establishment of aerotropolis transportation systems are eligible for 
                certain grants, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2010

   Mr. Cohen (for himself, Mr. Dingell, Ms. Moore of Wisconsin, Mr. 
 Tanner, Mr. Childers, Mr. Berry, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, 
 Ms. Granger, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. Perlmutter, Mr. 
 Payne, Mr. Pascrell, and Mr. Yarmuth) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend SAFETEA-LU to ensure that projects that assist the 
 establishment of aerotropolis transportation systems are eligible for 
                certain grants, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Aerotropolis Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. PROJECTS OF NATIONAL AND REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE.

    (a) Eligible Project Defined.--Section 1301(c)(2) of SAFETEA-LU (23 
U.S.C. 101 note) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Eligible project.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The term `eligible project' 
                means any surface transportation project eligible for 
                Federal assistance under title 23, United States Code, 
                including freight railroad projects and activities 
                eligible under such title.
                    ``(B) Inclusion of aerotropolis transportation 
                system projects.--The term `eligible project' includes 
                a combination of projects described in subparagraph (A) 
                that, as a group--
                            ``(i) assist the establishment of an 
                        aerotropolis transportation system; and
                            ``(ii) satisfy the requirement under 
                        subsection (d).''.
    (b) Aerotropolis Transportation System Defined.--Section 1301(c) of 
SAFETEA-LU (23 U.S.C. 101 note) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(4) Aerotropolis transportation system.--The term 
        `aerotropolis transportation system' means a planned and 
        coordinated multimodal freight and passenger transportation 
        network that, as determined by the Secretary, provides 
        efficient, sustainable, and intermodal connectivity to a 
        defined region of economic significance centered around a major 
        airport.''.
                                 <all>
```
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 945/2004

of 4 May 2004         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 5 May 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 May 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Agriculture Director-General

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 4 May 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2081/2003 (OJ L 313, 28.11.2003, p. 11). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
# C_2007159EN.01000301.xml

| 12.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4720 — Doughty Hanson/Axcom)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 159/03)

On 5 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4720. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4720. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
**EXHIBIT 23**
**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements ofConexant Systems, Inc. on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-68755, 333-69385, 333-84187,333-91347, 333-92437, 333-32448, 333-37918, 333-39184, 333-42498, 333-42772,333-42728, 333-48224, 333-48262, 333-44094, 333-54646, 333-54672, 333-68724,333-70420, 333-73142, 333-73858, 333-86838, 333-86868 and 333-97539) and in theRegistration Statements of Conexant Systems, Inc. on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-70085,333-30596, 333-38890, 333-42500, 333-48270, 333-61912, 333-67190, 333-88038 and333-97285) of our report dated October 27, 2003, except for Note18, as to which thedate is November 3, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion andincludes explanatory paragraphs referring to a restatement to report the June27, 2003 spin-off of the Mindspeed Technologies business as discontinuedoperations and a change in accounting method ), appearing in this Annual Reporton Form 10-K of Conexant Systems, Inc.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Costa Mesa, California
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5448 

To amend section 466(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to extend 

the deadline for the distribution of late collections for the Federal Perkins 

Loan program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 27, 2010 

Mr. SPRATT (for himself, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, and Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend section 466(b) of the Higher Education Act of 

1965 to extend the deadline for the distribution of late 

collections for the Federal Perkins Loan program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Perkins Loan Exten5 sion Act of 2010’’. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5448 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISTRIBUTION OF LATE COLLECTIONS. 

2 Section 466(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

3 (20 U.S.C. 1087ff(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘October 

4 1, 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘October 1, 2013’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 14, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 14, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18I0054. CHARLES LEE JOHNSON v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2016CV273869
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.4


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Banknote Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick
J. Gentile, Executive Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                           /s/ Patrick J. Gentile
                                           ----------------------
                                           Patrick J. Gentile
                                           Executive Vice President Finance and
                                           Chief Financial Officer


Date: August 14, 2004
American Banknote Corporation
51 West 52nd Street
New York, NY 10019
212-582-9200 LH




August 18, 1995

Mr. Robert Wilcox
5512 Atlantic View
St. Augustine, FL 32084

Dear Bob:

I'm very pleased to confirm the offer of employment we discussed
over the phone.  The offer consists of the following:

Start Date      Tuesday, September 5, 1995

Title     Senior Vice President, Manufacturing, reporting to the
Chief Operating Officer/Executive Officer

Base Annual Salary     $180,000, to be reviewed annually

Bonus     Target bonus of 35% of base salary dependent upon the
achievement of mutually agreeable goals. Bonuses for a year are
generally payable at the end of the first quarter of the following
year as soon as the results of the prior year are known.  For 1995,
we will set mutually agreeable goals to be acheived by  the end of
the year.  Your bonus will be pro-rated and your target will be 35%
of the salary you have earned.

Stock Options     25,000 options will be granted at the market
price on the date of grant, which will be as soon as practical
after your date of hire, but no later than the first Board Meeting
presently scheduled for September 21. 

Car Allowance    $500 per month

Club Dues    $200 per month personal dues and use of a
corporate country club membership to be established at a new plant
site.

Benefits     Participation in the Executive Benefits Program
(summary attached). 

Relocation     If necessary, the company will provide you with
moving expenses, $10,000 for interim living expenses, 3
house-hunting trips with your spouse, and closing and broker fees.
You will be grossed-up as necessary.

Company Paid Housing     Only if necessary at a new site, the
company will provide for an apartment or house, depending on the
rental economics.

Severance     Unless you are terminated due to cause, you will
receive 1 year base annual salary in severance, with continuation
of your basic health and dental benefits until the end of the
severance period or until you are eligible for coverage under
another employer's plan.  In return for this severance arrangement,
you will be required to sign a release.

This offer is contingent upon your obtaining a release from
Transcontinental, your signing the Executive Employment Agreement
previously supplied to you, and a successful reference check. 
We're all looking forward to seeing you on Tuesday after Labor Day,
and are sure you will make valuable contributions to the company in
a very short period of time. 
 
Please countersign this letter and return it to me at your earliest
convenience.

Sincerely,                              Accepted:

s/ JoAnne Martinez                      S/ Robert Wilcox

JoAnne Martinez                         Robert Wilcox


Enclosure
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

V.G., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, 

U.S. COAST GUARD INTEGRATED SUPPORT 

COMMAND, Portsmouth, VA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0180

Issued: October 28, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On November 18, 2020 appellant sought an appeal from a purported November 18, 2020 

decision and an August 14, 2020 merit decision of the Office of Workers’Compensation Programs 

(OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 21-0180.

The Board, having duly considered the matter, notes that it has jurisdiction to review final 

adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.1 This 

jurisdiction encompasses any final decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the date appellant 

filed his appeal.2 

The Board notes that the case record does not contain a final adverse decision of OWCP 

dated November 18, 2020. The most recent final adverse decision of OWCP is dated 

August 14, 2020.

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the date of 

issuance of a decision of OWCP.”
2

Regarding appellant’s appeal of OWCP’s August 14, 2020 decision, the Board notes that

it has already issued a decision regarding this appeal on September 21, 2021 in Docket No. 

20-1520.3 

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes the appeal of OWCP’s August 14, 

2020 decision was addressed in the Board’s September 21, 2021 decision in Docket No. 20-1520. 

Additionally, the Board finds that there is no final adverse decision of OWCP dated 

November 18, 2020. Therefore, the appeal docketed as Docket No. 21-0180 shall be dismissed. 

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0180 is dismissed.

Issued: October 28, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board notes that appellant previously filed an appeal of OWCP’s August 14, 2020 decision on 

August 17, 2020. The Clerk of the Appellate Boards docketed the appeal as No. 20-1520.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONOF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Cornelius C.Vanderstar, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of International Aluminum Corporation;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a.     designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b.     evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c.     disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.     all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.     any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  February 11, 2004 | /s/ CORNELIUS C. VANDERSTAR |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                          | Cornelius C. Vanderstar     |
|                          | Chairman of the Board and   |
|                          | Chief Executive Officer     |

 

1

----
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 32001R1144

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1144/2001 of 11 June 2001 fixing, for the purposes of Regulation (EC) No 411/97, the ceiling for Community financial assistance granted to producer organisations setting up operational funds for 2000***Official Journal L 155 , 12/06/2001 P. 0006 - 0006*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1144/2001

of 11 June 2001

fixing, for the purposes of Regulation (EC) No 411/97, the ceiling for Community financial assistance granted to producer organisations setting up operational funds for 2000

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 411/97 of 3 March 1997 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 as regards operational programmes, operational funds and Community financial assistance(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1923/1999(2), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 15(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96(3), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 911/2001(4), provides for the granting of Community financial assistance to producer organisations setting up operational funds. Paragraph 5 of that Article provides that from 1999, financial assistance is to be capped at 4,5 % of the value of the marketed production of each producer organisation, provided that the total financial assistance represents less than 2,5 % of the total turnover of all producer organisations.

(2) According to information forwarded to the Commission by the Member States pursuant to Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 411/97, the financial assistance applied for in respect of 2000 by producer organisations amounts to EUR 342,46 million against a total turnover of all producer organisations of EUR 12753,69 million. The ceiling for the abovementioned Community financial assistance should therefore be set at 3,4780 % of the value of marketed production of each producer organisation,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Community financial assistance provided for in Article 15(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 shall be capped at 3,4780 % of the value of marketed production of each producer organisation for aid applications in respect of 2000.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 June 2001.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 62, 4.3.1997, p. 9.

(2) OJ L 238, 9.9.1999, p. 11.

(3) OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1.

(4) OJ L 129, 11.5.2001, p. 3.