alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220. 

*Dates:*                     Written comments should be received on or before November 17, 2005 to be assured of consideration.                 

## Bureau of Public Debt 

*OMB Number:*                     1535-0091.                 

*Type of Review:*                     Extension.                 

*Title:*                     Regulations Governing U.S. Treasury Securities-State and Local Government Series.                 

*Description:*                     The information is requested to establish an investor account, issue and redeem securities.                 

*Respondents:*                     State or Local Government.                 

*Estimated Total Burden Hours:*                     542 hour.                 

Clearance Officer: Vicki S. Thorpe, (304) 480-8150, Bureau of the Public Debt, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, West Virginia 26106. 

OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7316, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. 

Michael A. Robinson,

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-20763 Filed 10-17-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


RULE
13a-14(1) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the quarterly report of Petrosearch Energy Corporation, (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard
Dole, Chief Executive officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      company.







Date: May
15, 2008








By:
            /s/
      Richard DoleRichard
      DoleChief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 99. (i)(b)

    Amendments to The Savings and Profit Sharing Fund of
               Sears Employees Trust Agreement          


RESOLVED, that The Savings and Profit Sharing Fund of Sears Employees Trust
Agreement be amended by adding a new Subsection 4.3(g) as follows, and
renumbering the current Subsection 4.3(g) as new Subsection (h):

"(g)  to move cash between Trust accounts in accordance with instructions
electronically transmitted pursuant to a computer system known as Client
Initiated Transaction to the extent provided by a written agreement entered
into between the Trustee and either the Company or the Investment Committee
governing the use of such system; and";

FURTHER RESOLVED, that the word "and" be deleted at the end of Subsection
4.3(f); and

FURTHER RESOLVED, that Alan J. Lacy, Anthony J. Rucci and Michael D. Levin,
or any of them acting alone are authorized to sign an instrument with The
Northern Trust Company of New York to acknowledge the effect of this
amendment, and that the effective date of the amendment shall be the date of
the signed instrument between the parties.
Exhibit 11.2


                                EARNINGS PER SHARE
                            FULLY DILUTED COMPUTATION
               ($ in millions, except share and per share amounts)



                                              Three Months Ended
                                                 September 30,        
                                            -----------------------   
                                               1997          1996
                                            ---------     --------- 

Basis for computation of earnings per 
 common and common equivalent shares:
  Earnings (loss) from continuing
   operations                                $(381.4)       $ 36.6
  Deduct dividends on 4 Percent
   cumulative preferred stock                    (.1)          (.1)
                                            ---------     ---------  
  Earnings (loss) from continuing
   operations available to common
    shareholders                              (381.5)         36.5
  Discontinued operations                                     (1.2)
                                             ---------    ---------

  Available for common shareholders          $(381.5)       $ 35.3
                                             =========    =========   
        



Number of shares:
  Weighted average shares outstanding     72,475,492    74,231,367
  Shares issuable upon exercise of
   stock options, net of shares assumed
   to be repurchased                         690,964     1,567,034
                                          ----------    ----------
                                          73,166,456    75,798,401
                                          ==========    ==========


Earnings (loss) per common share:
  Continuing operations                       $(5.21)         $.48
  Discontinued operations                                     (.01)
                                              -------       -------
  Net earnings                                $(5.21)         $.47
                                              =======       =======
Opinion issued April 2 0 , 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals
For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01

- 22

- 00721

- CV

——————————— WA LGREEN, CO., WALGREE N BOOTS ALLIANCE, INC. AND WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE HOLDINGS, LLC , Appellant s V. BETH HAUSER BOYER AND JOHN HAUSER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ALEXANDER HAUSER, DECEASED , Appellee s

O n Appeal from the 133rd Distr ict Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016

- 55915

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant has filed an unoppose d motion to dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(1). No opinion has issued. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(c).2

Accordi ngly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motio n s as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Kelly and Goodman

.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-17806, 33-39627, 33-46687, 33-81986, 33-60947
and 333-08597) of Xicor, Inc. of our report dated January 21, 1998, appearing on
page 17 of the 1997 Annual Report to Shareholders which is incorporated in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
our report on the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears on page 10 of this
Form 10-K.
 
                                          PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
 
San Jose, California
March 24, 1998
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5355 

To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to repeal the limitation of liability 

of a responsible party for a discharge or substantial threat of a discharge 

of oil from an offshore oil facility. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2010 

Mr. GRIJALVA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to repeal the limitation of liability of a responsible party for a discharge 

or substantial threat of a discharge of oil from an offshore oil facility. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF LIMITATION OF LIABILITY OF RE4 SPONSIBLE PARTY FOR DISCHARGE OF OIL 

5 FROM AN OFFSHORE FACILITY. 

6 (a) REPEAL.—Section 1004(a) of the Oil Pollution 

7 Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2704(a)) is amended by— 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5355 IH

1 (1) inserting ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon at the 

2 end of paragraph (2); 

3 (2) striking paragraph (3); and 

4 (3) redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph 

5 (3). 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 subsection (a) take effect on April 15, 2010. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### ALVIN ROLAND BEETS, Sr., Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 9553

March 2, 1978

575 P.2d 591

*Morgan D. Harris,*Public Defender, and *Thomas L. Leen,*Deputy Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellant.

*Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *George E. Holt,*District Attorney, and *H. Leon Simon,*Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

*90OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Convicted by jury verdict of first degree murder, appellant contends (1) the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict, and (2) the district court erred by refusing to give a jury instruction proposed by appellant. We disagree.

1. Appellant first contends we must reverse his conviction due to the conflicting testimony presented on the circumstances of the shooting of the victim. Although appellant testified he shot the victim in self defense when she attacked him with a pair of scissors, two prosecution witnesses testified they saw appellant shoot her in the back as she was exiting her residence to go to work.

“When there is conflicting testimony presented, it is for the jury to determine what weight and credibility to give the testimony. ‘Where there is substantial evidence to support a verdict in a criminal case, as the record indicates in this case, the reviewing court will not disturb the verdict nor set aside the judgment.’ ” Hankins v. State, 91 Nev. 477, 478, 538 P.2d 167, 168 (1975).

2. Appellant’s second contention is rejected because the subject of the proposed instruction was covered in another instruction given by the court. “ ‘It is not error to refuse to give an instruction when the law encompassed therein is substantially covered by another instruction given to the jury.’ ” Geary v. State, 91 Nev. 784, 793, 544 P.2d 417, 423 (1975).

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 23**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 2-80037, 33-18081,33-23793, 33-41485, 33-45479, 33-55825, 33-58851, 33-64345,333-08141, 333-52056, 333-72514,333-87942 and 333-113532 of Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Registration Statement No. 333-92082 of Sears,Roebuck and Co. and Sears Roebuck Acceptance Corp.; Registration Statement Nos. 33-64775,333-18591, 333-43309 and 333-120219 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the Sears Roebuck and Co.Deferred Compensation Plan; Registration Statement No. 333-102114 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and theSears 401(K) Savings Plan (formerly, The Savings and Profit Sharing Fund of Sears Employees and theSears 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan) and Lands’ End, Inc. Retirement Plan; Registration Statement No.333-38131 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the Sears Associate Stock Purchase Plan (formerly theAssociate Stock Ownership Plan); Registration Statement No. 333-121776 of Sears, Roebuck and Co.and the Sears Puerto Rico Savings Plan; and Registration Statement No. 333-120954 of Sears HoldingsCorporation, of our report dated February 23, 2005, relating to the financial statements andfinancial statement schedule of Sears, Roebuck and Co., and management’s report on theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in the Annual Report on Form10-K of Sears, Roebuck and Co. for the year ended January 1, 2005.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chicago, IL
**Exhibit 31(a)**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Alan J. Lacy, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this amendment to annual report on Form 10-K of Sears, Roebuck and Co.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this amendment to annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this amendment to annual report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisamendment to annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisamendment to annual report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, orcaused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to bedesigned under oursupervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relatingto the registrant, includingits consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within thoseentities, particularly duringthe period in which thisamendment to annual report isbeing prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’sdisclosure controls andprocedures and presented inthis amendment to annualreport our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of thedisclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by thisamendment to annual reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this amendmentto annual report any changein the registrant’s internalcontrol over financialreporting that occurredduring the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of anannual report) that hasmaterially affected, or isreasonably likely tomaterially affect, theregistrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses inthe design or operation ofinternal control overfinancial reporting which arereasonably likely toadversely affect theregistrant’s ability torecord, process, summarizeand report financialinformation; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involvesmanagement or other employeeswho have a significant rolein the registrant’s internalcontrol over financialreporting.
Date: February 15, 2005
/s/ Alan J. Lacy
#### MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, a California Corporation, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE JOSEPH S. PAVLIKOWSKI, Judge of the Eighth Judicial District Court for the State of Nevada, in and for the County of Clark, VINCENT J. CHERUBINI and ANNA J. CHERUBINI, Respondents.

No. 10189

April 6, 1978

576 P.2d 748

*Thorndal and Liles, Ltd.,*and *Robert W. Austin,*Las Vegas, for Petitioner.

*James L. Buchanan, II,*Las Vegas, for Respondents.

*163OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

In this original proceeding petitioner attempts to compel the district court to annul its order granting partial summary judgment for Cherubini and wife against petitioner Mid-Century Insurance Company’s fixing the Company’s liability for fire loss incurred by the insureds Cherubinis. The issue of damages has not been tried. NRCP 56(c). The judgment, therefore, is not a final judgment, *cf.*Dzack v. Marshall, 80 Nev. 345, 393 P.2d 610 (1964), and may not be reviewed by this Court except by permissive appeal. NRCP 54(b); NRAP 3A(b).

Proceedings dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS





I, Albert J. Finch, certify, that:





1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|      |              |  |     |                                         
|----- | ------------ |  | --- | ----------------------------------------
|Date: | May 11, 2007 |  | By: | /s/ Albert J. Finch                     
|      |              |  |     | Albert J. Finch, Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 209 (Monday, October 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 62350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21713]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION

[MCC FR 05-18]


Notice of the November 8, 2005 Millennium Challenge Corporation 
Board of Directors Meeting; Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Millennium Challenge Corporation.

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m. to 12 p.m., Tuesday, November 8, 2005

PLACE: Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20520.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information on the meeting may be 
obtained from Joyce B. Lanham via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#72301d130016321f11115c151d04"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="df9db0beadbb9fb2bcbcf1b8b0a9">[email protected]</span></a> or by 
telephone at (202) 521-3600.

STATUS: Meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Board of Directors (the ``Board'') of the 
Millennium Challenge Corporation (``MCC'') will hold a meeting to 
consider the selection of countries that will be eligible for FY 2006 
Millennium Challenge Account (``MCA'') assistance under section 607 of 
the Millennium Challenge Act of 2003 (the ``Act''), codified at 22 
U.S.C. 7706, or Threshold Program assistance under Section 616 of the 
Act; discuss progress on proposed Compacts with certain MCA-eligible 
countries; discuss MCC's proposed policy on suspension and termination 
of assistance and eligibility; and certain administrative matters. The 
agenda items are expected to involve the consideration of classified 
information and the meeting will be closed to the public.

    Dated: October 27, 2005.
Jon A. Dyck,
Vice President and General Counsel, Millennium Challenge Corporation.
[FR Doc. 05-21713 Filed 10-27-05; 11:42 am]
BILLING CODE 9210-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### DONALD H. COULTER and ESTHER L. COULTER, Appellants, v. EUREKA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, a Political Subdivision and a School Board; EUREKA COUNTY, a Political Subdivision; and the NEVADA STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, a Corporation, Respondents.

No. 7881

May 30, 1975

535 P.2d 797

*J. Rayner Kjeldsen,*Reno, for Appellants.

*Evans & Bilyeu,*Elko; *Thornton & Stephens*and *Phyllis Alsey Atkins,*Reno, for Respondents.

*368OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

This appeal from an order granting summary judgment is reversed for the same reasons we delineated in Kitchen Factors, Inc. v. Brown, 91 Nev. 308, 535 P.2d 677 (1975). This case is remanded for trial on its merits. Cf. NRCP 56 (c).

In accord with NRS 18.060, appellants will be allowed their costs on appeal, upon the proper filing of a cost bill.
Document

                                                

                                                Exhibit 10.3.1


SCHEDULE OF KEY EMPLOYEE CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENTS




In accordance with Instruction 2 to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, Fulton Financial Corporation (the "Corporation") has omitted filing Key Employee Change in Control Agreements by and between the Corporation and the following Executive Officers because they are substantially identical in all material respects to the form of the Executive Employment Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 4, 2018:


1.Mark R. McCollom
2.Curtis J. Myers
3.David M. Campbell
4.Beth Ann L. Chivinski
5.Natasha R. Luddington
6.Meg R. Mueller
7.Angela M. Sargent
8.Angela M. Snyder
9.Daniel R. Stolzer
10.Bernadette M. Taylor