alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS 

I, Darin Billerbeck, certify that: 

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ZiLOG, Inc.; 

2.	Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis annual report; 

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)	 Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of this annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's Board of Directors (or person performing the equivalentfunctions): 

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect, the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

  Date: June 22, 2007     By:    /s/ Darin Billerbeck             Darin Billerbeck *       President and Chief Executive Officer*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6645

OPHEILA AZRIEL DE’LONTA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE; M. V. SMITH, Doctor; R. HULBERT, Doctor; C. J. ANGLIKER, Doctor; DOCTOR WRAY; DOCTOR SWETTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-99-642-7) Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: August 4, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.Opheila Azriel De’Lonta, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; George W. Wooten, Peter Duane Vieth, WOOTEN & HART, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia; Heather Marie Kofron, WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Opheila Azriel De’Lonta appeals from the district court’sorder denying a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunctive relief. To the extent De’Lonta appeals the denial of a temporary restraining order, no circumstance warrants excepting this case from the general rule that such denials are ordinarily not apealable. See Virginia v. Tenneco, Inc. , 538 F.2d 1026, 1029- 30 (4th Cir. 1976). We therefore dismiss this portion of the appeal. Insofar as De’Lonta appeals the denial of an injunction, we find that the court applied the proper legal standard and did not abuse its discretion. See Direx Israel, Ltd. v. Breakthrough Medical Corp. , 952 F.2d 802, 814-15 (4th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See De’Lonta v. Angelone, No. CA-99-642-7 (W.D. Va. January 13, 2000). Finally, we deny DeLonta’s motion to expedite appeal as moot. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of AFP Imaging Corporation (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Donald Rabinovitch, Co-Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of
                the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Donald
      Rabinovitch








Donald
      Rabinovitch,


President


(Co-Principal
      Executive Officer)


September
      15, 2006
1

Filed 10/14/22 P. v. Vaughn CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

DAVID MATTHEW VAUGHN,

Defendant and Appellant. C095236

(Super. Ct. No. 21FE004252)

In March 2021, the People charged defendant David Matthew Vaughn with

manufacturing or transporting an assault weapon (Pen. Code, § 30600, subd. (a)),

possessing an assault weapon ( Pen. Code, § 30605, subd. (a)), and driving while his

privileges were revoked or suspended (Veh. Code, § 14601.1, subd. (b)(1)). Defendant

pled no contest to posses s ing an assault weapon. In exchange for his plea , the People

agreed to dismiss the remaining charges

.

The court sentenced defendant as follows: “Pursuant to the party’s [ sic ]

negotiated disposition, it’s the C ourt’s judgment and sentence that for a felony violation2

of Penal C ode section 30605( a ), that defendant

. . . that you are going to be placed

. . . on

formal probation for a period of two years. Imposition of sentence is suspended.

“As a condition of probation, I’m ordering that you serve 60 days in the county

jail.”

Contrary to the court ’s oral pronouncement of judgment, however, the clerk of the

court recorded in the minute order that the trial court suspended the execution of

defendant’s sentence, rather than its imposition . This was error, albeit a clerical one.

There is , however, a significant difference between suspending execution of judgment

and suspending its imposition. (See People v. Howard (1997) 16 Cal.4th 1081, 1087

-

1088; Pen. Code, § 1203.2, subd. (c).) Thus, on appeal defendant asks this court to

correct this clerical error ; the People concede the issue.

“Whe re there is a discrepancy between the oral pronouncement of judgment and

the minute order or the abstract of judgment, the oral pronouncement controls.” ( People

v. Zackery (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 380, 385.) We agree the clerk inaccurately recorded

the judgment pronounced by the court. We will, therefore, remand the matter and direct

the trial court to correct its minute order to accurately reflect the oral pronouncement of

the court. (See People v. Mitchell (2 001) 26 Cal.4th 181, 186

- 187 [ appellate courts have

authority to correct clerical errors ] .)

DISPOSITION

The judgment in this matter is affirmed. The matter is remanded for the sole

purpose of allowing the trial court to correct its September 24, 20 21 minute order to3

accurately reflect its judgment: T he court suspended the imposition of defendant’s

sentence

, not its execution.

/S/

RENNER , J.

We concur:

/S/

ROBIE , Acting P. J.

/S/

EARL , J.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES C. FLETCHER

No. 7520SC574

(Filed 3 December 1975)

Criminal Law § 26; Robbery § 6— armed robbery — assault with deadly weapon — conviction of both offenses — arrest of assault judgment

Defendant could not be convicted of armed robbery and the lesser included offense of assault with a deadly weapon where both offenses arose out of the same act or occurrence, and judgment on the charge of assault with a deadly weapon must be arrested.

Appeal by defendant from *Long, Judge.*Judgment entered 9 April 1975 in Superior Court, Richmond County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 21 October 1975.

Defendant was tried upon a bill of indictment charging him with the felony of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill resulting in serious bodily injuries not resulting in death and with armed robbery. Both charges arose out of the same occurrence. Defendant entered a plea of not guilty to each charge. The cases were consolidated for trial, and the jury returned as its verdict guilty of assault with a deadly weapon and guilty of armed robbery. From judgment imposing a prison sentence in each case, defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Edmisten, by Associate Attorney Sandra M. King, for the State.*

*Leath, Bynum, Kitchin & Neal, by Henry L. Kitchin, for defendant appellant.*

MARTIN, Judge.

We have carefully reviewed the assignments of error brought forward and argued by defendant in Case No. 75CR0304 *673(armed robbery) and find them to be without merit. The defendant was afforded a fair trial free from prejudicial error.

Although defendant has not raised the question, an error in Case No. 75CR0302 (assault with a deadly weapon) appears on the face of the record proper and, on our own motion, we arrest judgment in that case. The defendant was convicted of armed robbery and assault with a deadly weapon. Since both offenses of which he was convicted arose out of the same occurrence, the latter is a lesser included offense of the former. “ ‘An indictment for robbery with firearms will support a conviction of a lesser offense such as common law robbery, assault with a deadly weapon, larceny from the person, simple larceny or simple assault if a verdict for the included or lesser offense is supported by the evidence on the trial. (Citations).’” *State v. Hatcher,*277 N.C. 380, 177 S.E. 2d 892 (1970). The defendant, having been convicted of armed robbery, could not be convicted of - the lesser offense of assault with a deadly weapon where, as here, both offenses arose out of the same act or occurrence. The judgment on the verdict of guilty of assault with a deadly weapon should have been arrested.

The verdict of guilty of assault with a deadly weapon (No. 75CR0302) is set aside and the judgment arrested.

Armed robbery charge (No. 75CR0304) — no error.

Judges Morris and Parker concur.
EXHIBIT 4.11


                             CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF
                          REPUBLIC NEW YORK CAPITAL III

         THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST of Republic New York Capital III (the
"Trust"), dated as of November 18, 1997, is being duly executed and filed by
Bankers Trust (Delaware), a Delaware banking corporation, as trustee, Thomas F.
Robards, an individual, as trustee and Stephen Saali, an individual, as trustee
to form a business trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C.
Section 3801 et seq.).

         1. Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is Republic New
York Capital III.

         2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of
the Trust with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware are as
follows: Bankers Trust (Delaware), 1011 Centre Road, Suite 200, Wilmington, DE
19805-1266.

         3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon
filing with the Secretary of State.

         4. Duration. The Trust created hereby shall terminate on November 18,
2051.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust,
have executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first written above.

                                BANKERS TRUST (DELAWARE), not in its individual
                                capacity but solely as trustee


                                By:    /s/ M. Lisa Wilkins
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                    Name:
                                    Title:


                                THOMAS F. ROBARDS, not in his
                                individual capacity but solely as trustee


                                       /s/ Thomas F. Robards
                                -----------------------------------------------


                                STEPHEN J. SAALI, not in his individual
                                capacity but solely as trustee


                                      /s/ Stephen J. Saali
                                -----------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           469,354
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           17,027
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             18,879
<EQUITIES>                                       1,612
<MORTGAGE>                                      16,415
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   14,729
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 655,941
<CASH>                                           1,118
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              15,879
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          24,082
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,291,818
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                126,527
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             11,514
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 550,187
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            7,864
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 63,885
<COMMON>                                         1,130
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,643
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,291,818
<PREMIUMS>                                       8,212
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             48,760
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   2,639
<BENEFITS>                                      35,441
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      2,749
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            11,070
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,827
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,139
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,688
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,688
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.52
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 211 (Wednesday, November 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 66448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21825]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, SBIR Topic 186 Phase II: Target Based High Throughput 
Screening for the Identification of Radioprotector.
    Date: November 22, 2005.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: C. Michael Kerwin, PhD, MPH, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Special Review and Logistics Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institute 
of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8057, MSC 8329, Bethesda, 
MD 20892-8329. (301) 496-7421. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dbb0bea9acb2b5b69bb6bab2b7f5b5b2b3f5bcb4ad"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="52393720253b3c3f123f333b3e7c3c3b3a7c353d24">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 25, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-21825 Filed 11-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PATRICIA A. KAROUSSOS,

Appellant,

v.

PALM BEACH LIFTS, INC. and MARIA COLAFELLA,

Appellees.

No. 4D2022-0680

[February 15, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502020CA000906XXXXMB.

Rebecca Mercier Vargas and Stephanie L. Serafin of Kreusler-Walsh, 

Vargas & Serafin, West Palm Beach, and Scott B. Smith of Smith, Ball, 

Baez & Prather Florida Injury Lawyers, Palm Beach Gardens, for appellant.

David C. Borucke of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Tampa, for appellee 

Palm Beach Lifts, Inc.

No appearance for appellee Maria Colafella.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
** **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                W. G. Holliman                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   | W.                G. Holliman                       |
|   | Title:                Chief Executive Officer       |
|   | Furniture                Brands International, Inc. |
|   | August                7, 2006                       |
GUARANTEE



Exhibit 10.24


 

GUARANTEE


The undersigned, Interstate Business Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Guarantor"), hereby guarantees to pay upon demand the obligations of Interstate General Company L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, American Family Homes LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Caribe Waste Technologies, Inc. a Puerto Rico corporation, and Interstate Waste Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (collectively "IGC") to American Community Properties Trust, a Maryland business trust ("ACPT"), including a receivable of IGC due to ACPT in the amount of $158,523 at December 31, 2001.

This is a continuing guarantee and shall not be amended nor terminated except by written statement signed by ACPT, authorized by a majority of the independent trustees of ACPT.

The undersigned acknowledges that it together with its affiliates own a majority of the outstanding equity securities of IGC and ACPT, and that ACPT would not have extended credit to IGC in the past, nor will it extend credit to IGC in the future, without this guarantee.

Guarantor waives notice of acceptance of this guarantee and of any extensions thereof and protest and notice of dishonor or default.

This is a guarantee of payment and not of collection, and Guarantor waives any right to require that any action be brought against IGC or any other person or that resort be had to any security or credit on the books of ACPT in favor of any other person.

No delay on the part of ACPT in exercising any rights hereunder or failure to exercise of the same shall operate as a waiver of such rights against the undersigned.

This guarantee shall be deemed to be a contract entered into in and pursuant to the laws of the State of Maryland and shall in all respects be governed, construed, applied and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Maryland.  The undersigned agrees to submit to personal jurisdiction in the State of Maryland in any action arising out of this guarantee, and in any such action or proceeding service may be served upon the undersigned by registered mail to or by personal service at the last known address of the undersigned whether within or without the jurisdiction of any such court.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this guarantee as of this 25th day of March 2002.


	 	
INTERSTATE BUSINESS CORPORATION

	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	
By:
	
/s/ J. Michael Wilson

	 	 	
Its President

	 	 	 
	
WITNESS:
	 	 
	 	 	 
	
/s/ Martha Colson