Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 198 / Friday, October 14, 2005 / Proposed Rules 60037 

included as part of the public comment. 

If EPA cannot read your comment due 

to technical difficulties and cannot 

contact you for clarification, EPA may 

not be able to consider your comment. 

Docket: The index to the docket for 

this action is available electronically at 

http://docket.epa.gov/rmepub and in 

hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California. While all documents in the 

docket are listed in the index, some 

information may be publicly available 

only at the hard copy location (e.g., 

copyrighted material), and some may 

not be publicly available in either 

location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard 

copy materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Francisco Do ́n ̃ ez, EPA Region IX, (415) 

972–3956, Donez.Francisco@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

proposal addresses the following local 

rule: MBUAPCD 404. In the Rules and 

Regulations section of this Federal 

Register, we are approving this local 

rule in a direct final action without 

prior proposal because we believe these 

SIP revisions are not controversial. If we 

receive adverse comments, however, we 

will publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule and address the 

comments in subsequent action based 

on this proposed rule. 

We do not plan to open a second 

comment period, so anyone interested 

in commenting should do so at this 

time. If we do not receive adverse 

comments, no further activity is 

planned. For further information, please 

see the direct final action. 

Dated: September 13, 2005. 

Laura Yoshii, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 05–20602 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[R05–OAR–2005–WI–0002; FRL–7974–5] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Wisconsin 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

a revision to the Wisconsin State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) for an 

alternative volatile organic compounds 

(VOC) control device for Serigraph, 

Incorporated (Serigraph). On May 18, 

2005, the Wisconsin Department of 

Natural Resources submitted a request 

to revise the Wisconsin SIP. The 

proposed revision approves Serigraph’s 

use of a biofilter to control VOC 

emissions from its printing facility in 

Washington County, Wisconsin. The 

biofilter system will reliably control 

emissions at or below the level of the 

control methods listed in the SIP. 

Serigraph has designed one of its plants 

as a permanent total enclosure (PTE), 

which captures all VOC emissions and 

routes them to the biofilter. There are no 

fugitive emissions from the plant. This 

reduces the total VOC emissions from 

Serigraph’s facility. 

In the final rules section of this 

Federal Register, EPA is approving the 

SIP revision as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal, because EPA 

views this as a noncontroversial 

revision and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. We do not intend to take any 

further action in relation to this 

proposed rule unless we receive adverse 

comment this action. If EPA receives 

adverse comment, we will withdraw the 

direct final rule and will respond to all 

public comments in a subsequent final 

rule based on this proposed rule. EPA 

will not institute a second comment 

period on this action. Any parties 

interested in commenting on this action 

should do so at this time. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before November 14, 

2005. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by Regional Material in 

EDocket (RME) ID No. R05–OAR–2005–

WI–0002 by one of the following 

methods: 

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Agency Web site: http:// 

docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. 

RME, EPA’s electronic public docket 

and comment system, is EPA’s preferred 

method for receiving comments. Once 

in the system, select ‘‘quick search,’’

then key in the appropriate RME Docket 

identification number. Follow the 

online instructions for submitting 

comments. 

E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov. 

Fax: (312) 886–5824. 

Mail: You may send written 

comments to: John M. Mooney, Chief, 

Criteria Pollutant Section, (AR–18J), 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. 

Hand delivery: Deliver your 

comments to: John M. Mooney, Chief, 

Criteria Pollutant Section (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

18th floor, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

Such deliveries are only accepted 

during the Regional Office’s normal 

hours of operation. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

RME ID No. R05–OAR–2005–WI–0002. 

EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through RME, regulations.gov, 

or e-mail. The EPA RME Web site and 

the Federal regulations.gov Web site are 

‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through RME or 

regulations.gov, your e-mail address 

will be automatically captured and 

included as part of the comment that is 

placed in the public docket and made 

available on the Internet. If you submit 

an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional instructions on 

submitting comments, go to Section I(B) 

of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

section of this document. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the RME 

index at http://www.epa.gov/rmepub/. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

i.e., CBI or other information the 

disclosure of which is restricted by 

statute. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in RME or in hard copy at 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

60038 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 198 / Friday, October 14, 2005 / Proposed Rules 

Illinois 60604. Please telephone Matt 

Rau at (312) 886–6524 before visiting 

the Region 5 Office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt 

Rau, Environmental Engineer, Criteria 

Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch 

(AR–18J), USEPA, Region 5, 77 West 

Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 

60604, (312) 886–6524. 

Rau.matthew@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does This Action Apply to Me? 

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My 

Comments for EPA? 

II. What Action Is EPA Taking Today? 

III. Where Can I Find More Information 

About This Proposal and the 

Corresponding Direct Final Rule? 

I. General Information 

A. Does This Action Apply to Me? 

This action applies to a single source, 

Serigraph, Incorporated of Washington 

County, Wisconsin. 

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare 

My Comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit CBI 

to EPA through RME, regulations.gov or 

e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of 

the information that you claim to be 

CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD 

ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the 

outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI 

and then identify electronically within 

the disk or CD ROM the specific 

information that is claimed as CBI. In 

addition to one complete version of the 

comment that includes information 

claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment 

that does not contain the information 

claimed as CBI must be submitted for 

inclusion in the public docket. 

Information so marked will not be 

disclosed except in accordance with 

procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

a. Identify the rulemaking by docket 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

b. Follow directions—The agency may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

c. Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

d. Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

e. If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

f. Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns, and suggest 

alternatives. 

g. Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

h. Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

II. What Action Is EPA Taking Today? 

EPA is proposing to approve a 

revision to the Wisconsin VOC SIP for 

Serigraph. The revision approves 

Serigraph’s use of a biofilter to control 

VOC emissions from several lines in 

Plant 2 at its facility. This is an 

alternative to the controls listed in the 

SIP. Section NR 422.04(2)(d) of the 

Wisconsin Administrative Code allows 

an alternative control method that is 

demonstrated to reliably control 

emissions to a level at or below the 

applicable SIP limit and is approved by 

the Wisconsin Department of Natural 

Resources. The biofilter will reliably 

control VOC emissions at a level in line 

with other control techniques for 

surface printing facilities. An eighty 

percent overall control efficiency for 

VOC emissions is required for a control 

device. Overall control efficiency 

includes both capture and destruction 

efficiencies. Plant 2 is designed as a PTE 

ensuring all the emissions are captured 

and exhausted into the biofilter. 

Serigraph has operated its biofilter since 

May 1997. An average of 54 tons of VOC 

emissions are vented to the biofilter 

each year. The average exhaust from the 

biofilter is about 8 tons of VOC per year. 

This comfortably exceeds the control 

requirement. 

III. Where Can I Find More Information 

About This Proposal and the 

Corresponding Direct Final Rule? 

For additional information, see the 

Direct Final Rule which is located in the 

Rules section of this Federal Register. 

Copies of the request and the EPA’s 

analysis are available electronically at 

RME or in hard copy at the above 

address. Please telephone Matt Rau at 

(312) 886–6524 before visiting the 

Region 5 Office. 

Dated: September 15, 2005. 

Bharat Mathur, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 05–20613 Filed 10–13–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Administration for Children and 

Families 

45 CFR Parts 302, 303 and 307 

State Parent Locator Service; 

Safeguarding Child Support 

Information 

AGENCY: Administration for Children 

and Families, Office of Child Support 

Enforcement (OCSE). 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Personal Responsibility 

and Work Opportunity Reconciliation 

Act of 1996 (PRWORA) created and 

expanded State and Federal title IV–D 

child support enforcement databases 

and significantly enhanced access to 

information for title IV–D child support 

purposes. States are moving toward 

integrated service delivery and 

developing enterprise architecture 

initiatives to link their program 

databases. This proposed rule is 

designed to prescribe requirements for: 

State Parent Locator Service responses 

to authorized location requests; and 

State IV–D agency safeguarding of 

confidential information and authorized 

disclosures of this information. This 

proposed rule would restrict the use of 

confidential data and information to 

child support purposes, with exceptions 

for certain disclosures permitted by 

statute. 

DATES: Consideration will be given to 

comments received by December 13, 

2005. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: Office of 

Child Support Enforcement, 

Administration for Children and 

Families, 370 L’Enfant Promenade, SW., 

4th floor, Washington, DC 20447. 

Attention: Director, Policy Division, 

Mail Stop: OCSE/DP. Comments will be 

available for public inspection Monday 

through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

on the 4th floor of the Department’s 

offices at the above address. You may 

also transmit written comments 

electronically via the Internet at: 

http://www.regulations.acf.gov. To 

download an electronic version of the 

rule, you may access http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yvette 

Hilderson Riddick, Policy and 

Automation Liaison, OCSE, 202–401–

4885, e-mail: yriddick@acf.hhs.gov. Deaf 

and hearing-impaired individuals may 

call the Federal Dual Party Relay 

Service at 1–800–877–8339 between 8 

a.m. and 7 p.m. eastern time.