alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense (DoD).

# ACTION:

Notice of 1-year suspension of the price evaluation adjustment for small disadvantaged businesses.

# SUMMARY:

The Director of Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy has suspended the use of the price evaluation adjustment for small disadvantaged businesses (SDBs) in DoD procurements, as required by 10 U.S.C. 2323(e)(3), because DoD exceeded its 5 percent goal for contract awards to SDBs in fiscal year 2004. The suspension will be in effect for 1 year and will be reevaluated based on the level of DoD contract awards to SDBs achieved in fiscal year 2005.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         February 24, 2005.                    

*Applicability Date:*                         This suspension applies to all solicitations issued during the period from February 24, 2005, to February 23, 2006.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Susan Schneider, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(P), 3015 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3015, telephone (703) 614-4840; facsimile (703) 614-1254.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to the authority granted in 10 U.S.C. 2323(e), DoD has previously granted SDBs a 10 percent price preference in certain acquisitions. This price preference is implemented in Subpart 19.11 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation. Section 801 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Pub. L. 105-261) amended 10 U.S.C. 2323(e)(3) to prohibit DoD from granting such a price preference for a 1-year period following a fiscal year in which DoD achieved the 5 percent goal for contract awards established in 10 U.S.C. 2323(a). Since, in fiscal year 2004, DoD exceeded this 5 percent goal, use of this price preference in DoD acquisitions must be suspended for a 1-year period, from February 24, 2005, to February 23, 2006.

Michele P. Peterson, 

Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

[FR Doc. 05-2174 Filed 2-3-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-08-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of W&T Offshore, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                                   
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 5, 2008 |  | /s/ TRACY W. KROHN                                
|                       |  | Tracy W. Krohn                                    
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer                           
|                       | 
|Date: November 5, 2008 |  | /s/ JOHN D. GIBBONS                               
|                       |  | John D. Gibbons                                   
|                       |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
|                       |  | Chief Accounting Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSEPH MANDER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 157 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 28, 2011

h1219 

# Order

December 28, 2011

143644

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143644 COA: 294927 THOMAS ALFRED YOUNG, Ionia CC: 2009-014296-FH Defendant-Appellant.

___________________ _________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 5, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [CO-922-05-1310-FI; COC66816]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management; Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease COC66816 for lands in Rio Blanco County, Colorado, was timely filed and was accompanied by all the required rentals accruing from the date of termination.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Beverly A. Derringer Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at 303.239.3765.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $5.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year and 16 2/3 percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $155 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease COC66816 effective May 1, 2004, subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.

Dated: November 19, 2004.

Beverly A. Derringer,

Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication.

[FR Doc. 05-21739  Filed 10-31-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
                                               OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted, Darin Billerbeck, Chief Executive Officer, and Perry
J. Grace, Chief Financial Officer, of ZiLOG, Inc., each hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:

1) The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2007, to which this Certification is
attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material aspects the financial condition and results of operations of ZiLOG, Inc. for the
period covered by the Report.



| |                          
| | -------------------------
| | Date: June 22, 2007      
| |                          
| | By:    /s/ Perry J. Grace

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Perry J. Grace         
| | Chief Financial Officer



| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| | By:    /s/ Darin Billerbeck

| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| |                                      
| | Darin Billerbeck                     
| | President and Chief Executive Officer

---
Opinion issued April 20, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-22-00721-CV

———————————

WALGREEN, CO., WALGREEN BOOTS ALLIANCE, INC. AND 

WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellants

V.

BETH HAUSER BOYER AND JOHN HAUSER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ALEXANDER HAUSER, 

DECEASED, Appellees

On Appeal from the 133rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-55915

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(1). No opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c). 
2

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Kelly and Goodman.
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

T.H., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, 

Shaker Heights, OH, Employer

_________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0032

Issued: November 21, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Alan J. Shapiro, Esq., for the appellant1

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On October 12, 2022 appellant, through counsel, filed a timely appeal from a

September 28, 2022, merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). 

The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 23-0032.

In a letter dated and received October 25, 2022, counsel requested that the appeal be 

dismissed.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that counsel’s request f or the 

dismissal of the appeal should be granted. Accordingly, 

1

In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no cla im f or a f ee f or 

legal or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 

20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the 

Board. Id. An attorney or representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s a pproval m ay constitute a 

misdemeanor, subject to fine or imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also 18 U.S.C. § 292. Dem ands 

for payment of fees to a representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for 

investigation.
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the dismissal of the appeal 

is granted. The appeal docketed as No. 23-0032 is dismissed.

Issued: November 21, 2022

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 26, 2014

t0319 

# Order

Clerk March 26, 2014

148060

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

P laintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 148060

COA: 311270

Montcalm CC: 2010

- 013581

- FC

STEVEN WARREN STEWART,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 15, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Anthony D’Addio *v.*Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Association Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Association *v.*Anthony D’Addio

*Philip F. von Kuhn,*in support of the petition.

*Ira B. Grudberg*and *Alice S. Miskimin,*in opposition.

Decided May 17, 1993

The Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Association’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 729 (AC 11410), is denied.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WALTER ANDRE GOODSON

No. 7526SC152

(Filed 2 July 1975)

Appeal by defendant from *Falls, Judge.*Judgments entered 23 October 1974 in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 13 May 1975.

Defendant was charged in two bills of indictment with (1) the felony of armed robbery and (2) the felony of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill, inflicting serious injuries.

The State’s evidence tended to show the following: On 27 May 1974, at approximately 5:45 p.m., defendant entered Broadway’s Furniture Company on Rozzells Ferry Road in the City of Charlotte. The only persons in the store at that time were Mr. Broadway and his secretary, Mrs. Arnold. Defendant walked directly to the desk where Broadway was working. When defendant was about three feet from Broadway, he pulled a pistol from under his jacket and announced: “[T]his is a holdup, *532give me your money.” Defendant took Broadway’s watch and wallet, and the money from the cash drawer. Defendant then walked about fifteen feet toward the front door, stopped, turned aroúnd, and shot Broadway in the forehead. Defendant proceeded another five feet toward the front door, stopped again, turned, and shot Broadway in the groin. Broadway’s wallet contained his driver’s license, a check payable to Broadway in the sum of $437.00, and a check payable to Broadway in the sum of $48.78. Broadway was hospitalized for several days for treatment of the gunshot wounds, and suffered total blindness of his right eye. About three to four hours after .the robbery, defendant undertook to cash the $48.78 check at Midget Supermarket, but was refused. The day after the robbery the investigating officer found the $487.00 check, the $48.78 check, and Broadway’s driver’s license near the Southside Apartments. Each of the items had been torn up. Defendant was arrested at his sister’s apartment in Southside Apartments.

Defendant denied the robbery and the shooting. He offered evidence which tended to account for his actions throughout the day of the robbery and shooting. His evidence tended to show that he was not in the vicinity of Broadway’s Furniture Company or Midget Supermarket during the entire day in question.

*Attorney General Edmisten, by Associate Attorney George J. Oliver, for the State.*

*Edmund A. Liles, for the defendant.*

BROCK, Chief Judge.

We have examined all assignments of error properly brought forward. In our opinion they are wholly without merit. Defendant had a fair trial free from prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Morris and Hedrick concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5278 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 490
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5278

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 10, 2010

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             July 28, 2010

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 405 West Second Street in Dixon, Illinois, as the ``President Ronald 
                   W. Reagan Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRESIDENT RONALD W. REAGAN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 405 West Second Street in Dixon, Illinois, shall be known 
and designated as the ``President Ronald W. Reagan Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``President 
Ronald W. Reagan Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 490

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5278

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 405 West Second Street in Dixon, Illinois, as the ``President Ronald 
                   W. Reagan Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 28, 2010

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### SIOUX TRIBE OF INDIANS v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. C-531-7]

*[Ante,*p. 613; 318 U. S. —]

Indian claims; treaty of 1868; lands acquired by Government under Act of 1877; “taking”; “misappropriation”; authority of Congress.

Decided June 1, 1942; petition dismissed. Plaintiff’s motion for new trial overruled October 5, 1942.

Plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court April 19, 1943.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 210 (Tuesday, November 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 65926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21732]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[CGD09-05-130]


Great Lakes Regional Waterways Management Forum

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Great Lakes Regional Waterways Management Forum will hold 
a meeting to discuss various waterways management issues. Potential 
agenda items will include navigation, ballast water regulations, 
Automatic Identification Systems (AIS), waterways management, and 
discussions about the agenda for the next meeting. The meeting will be 
open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held November 17, 2005 from 1 p.m. to 5 
p.m., and November 18, 2005 from 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. Comments must be 
submitted on or before November 14, 2005 to be considered at the 
meeting.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Village Inn, 751 Christina 
Street, Point Edward, Ontario. Any written comments and materials 
should be submitted to Commander (dpw-1), Ninth Coast Guard District, 
1240 E. 9th Street, Room 2069, Cleveland, OH 44199.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LTjg Regan Blomshield (dpw-1), Ninth 
Coast Guard District, 1240 E. 9th Street, Room 2069, Cleveland, OH 
44199, telephone (216) 902-6050. Persons with disabilities requiring 
assistance to attend this meeting should contact LTjg Blomshield.

SUPPLEMENTARY: The Great Lakes Waterways Management Forum identifies 
and resolves waterways management issues that involve the Great Lakes 
region. The forum meets twice a year to assess the Great Lakes region, 
assign priorities to areas of concern and identify issues for 
resolution. The forum membership has identified potential agenda items 
for this meeting that include: navigation, AIS, ballast water 
regulations, waterways management, and discussions about the agenda for 
the next meeting. The specific agenda is still under development. 
Additional topics of discussion are solicited from the public.

    Dated: October 20, 2005.
Robert J. Papp Jr.,
Rear Admiral, U. S. Coast Guard, Commander, Ninth Coast Guard District, 
Cleveland, Ohio.
[FR Doc. 05-21732 Filed 10-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 18
- 00281
- CV

David E. Jones, Appellant

v. Jessica L. Jones, Appellee

FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TR AVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- FM
- 13
- 001139 , THE HONORABLE GISE LA D. TRIANA, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief on appeal was originally due July 9, 2018. On appellant’s motion, the time for filing was extended to October 8, 2018. Appellant has now filed a third motion, requesting that the Court extend the time for filing app ellant’s brief. We grant the motion for extension of time and order appellant to file a brief no later than November 8, 2018. No further extension of time will be granted and failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 38.8(a) , 42.3(b)

.

It is ordered on October 19, 2018.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Field and Toth