alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═** 

### Misc. Docket No. 2 1

- 9052

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

**═**

__________________________________________________
TRANSFER OF CASE FROM THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS TO THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

___________________________________________________
Pursuant to Tex. Gov = t Code ' 73.001, the following case is hereby transferred from th e Cou rt of Appeals for the Fourteenth District

, Houston , Texas, to the Cou rt of Appeals for the Fifth Distric t, Dallas , Texas:

Case No. 1 4

- 2 1

- 0 0234

- CV In re David Mu

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals will make the necessary order s for the transfer of the case directed hereby and will cause the Clerk of that Court to transfer or transmit all filings in the case, and verify all o rders made, to the Fifth Court of Appeals. Upon completion of the transfer, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals shall provide notice of the transfer to the Supreme Court and the State Office of Court Administr ation.

ORDERED by the Supreme Court of Texas, in Chambers,

With the Seal thereof affixed at the City of Austin, this 6 th day of May , 20 2 1

.

_______________________________________ BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      20,507
<SECURITIES>                                   556
<RECEIVABLES>                              102,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                (2,397)
<INVENTORY>                                 31,955
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           162,626
<PP&E>                                     332,768
<DEPRECIATION>                            (149,485)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             409,368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       57,366
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    16,092
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                 316,445
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               409,368
<SALES>                                    159,241
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           159,241
<CGS>                                      104,135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              104,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               477
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,679
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,118
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,628
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,628
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .65
        















</TABLE>
# L_2007069EN.01002601.xml

| 9.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 69/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 69/26

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 255/2007

of 8 March 2007

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 936/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/2006 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/2006 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 2 to 8 March 2007 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 936/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 March 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 March 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 172, 24.6.2006, p. 6.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 19, 2005)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 61023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21053]



[[Page 61021]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part IV





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Notice of October 17, 2005--Intention To Enter Into a Free Trade 
Agreement With Oman


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 19, 2005 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 61023]]

                Notice of October 17, 2005

                
Intention To Enter Into a Free Trade Agreement 
                With Oman

                Consistent with section 2105(a)(1)(A) of the Trade Act 
                of 2002, I have notified the Congress of my intention 
                to enter into a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the 
                Sultanate of Oman.

                Consistent with section 2105(a)(1)(A) of that Act, this 
                notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    October 17, 2005.

[FR Doc. 05-21053
Filed 10-18-05; 9:34 am]
Billing code 3190-01-P
# C_2007220EN.01000401.xml

| 20.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4787 — Rhenus/TMI)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 220/03)

On 28 August 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4787. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4787. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

D.M., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE,

Hallstead, PA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0163

Issued: January 12, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On November 7, 2022 appellant filed an appeal from a February 2, 2022 decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 23-0163.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation 

Act.1 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance 

of OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the February 2, 2022 decision was August 1, 2022. As appellant 

did not file an appeal with the Board until November 7, 2022, more than 180 days after the

February 2, 2022 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 23-0163 is 

untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not 

explained her failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to 

1

5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e).
2

establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP 

within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed 

as No. 23-0163, must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-0163 is dismissed.

Issued: January 12, 2023

Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id.

at § 501.6(d).
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Telos Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John B. Wood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Michele Nakazawa, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: December 16, 2008/s/    John B. WoodJohn B. WoodChief Executive OfficerDate: December 16, 2008/s/    Michele NakazawaMichele NakazawaChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF WMS INDUSTRIES INC.



The following is a list of all direct and indirect subsidiaries of the Company and their jurisdictions of incorporation as of June 30, 2007. The name of each
indirect subsidiary is indented under the name of its parent company.



|                                  |  |                                        
|--------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Subsidiary                        |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation/Formation
|WMS Gaming Inc.                   |  | Delaware                               
|WMS Gaming (Canada) Ltd.          |  | New Brunswick, Canada                  
|WMS Gaming International, S.L.    |  | Spain                                  
|WMS Gaming Australia PTY Ltd.     |  | Australia                              
|WMS Gaming Africa (Pty) Ltd.      |  | South Africa                           
|WMS Gaming (UK) Limited           |  | United Kingdom                         
|WMS Gaming Slovakia, s.r.o.       |  | Slovakia                               
|Lenc-Smith Inc.                   |  | Delaware                               
|Williams Electronics Games, Inc.  |  | Delaware                               
|WMS Finance Inc.                  |  | Delaware                               
|WMS International Holdings Inc.   |  | Delaware                               
|Orion Financement Company B.V.    |  | Netherlands                            
|Orion Real Estate B.V.            |  | Netherlands                            
|Orion Assembly B.V.               |  | Netherlands                            
|Mercur Holland B.V.               |  | Netherlands                            
|Orion Gaming B.V.                 |  | Netherlands                            
|WMS Asia Holdings Inc.            |  | Delaware                               
|WMS International (Macau) Limited |  | Macau
# C_2008078EN.01000101.xml

| 29.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4955 — Hermes Logistik/Swiss Post Porta a Porta)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 78/01)

On 11 March 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M4955. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M4955. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-24-2000
<CASH>                                              32
<SECURITIES>                                        10
<RECEIVABLES>                                      866
<ALLOWANCES>                                        23
<INVENTORY>                                        749
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,733
<PP&E>                                           2,492
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,765
<BONDS>                                            660
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,782
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,408
<SALES>                                          8,048
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,048
<CGS>                                            7,550
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,550
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   305
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  43
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    150
<INCOME-TAX>                                        57
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 93
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (15)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        78
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70


</TABLE>
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

P.S., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, 

U.S. BORDER PATROL, Pine Valley, CA, 

Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-1061

Issued: February 28, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On July 8, 2021 appellant filed a timely appeal from a June 25, 2021 merit decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 21-1061.

On January 29, 2022 appellant requested that the appeal be withdrawn.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that appellant’s request for the 

withdrawal of the appeal should be granted. Accordingly, 
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the withdrawal of the appeal 

is granted. The appeal docketed as No. 21-1061 is dismissed.

Issued: February 28, 2022

Washington, DC

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Exhibit 32.2





Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350





Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Interstate Power and Light Company (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ William D. Harvey


William D. Harvey


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Patricia L. Kampling


Patricia L. Kampling


Vice President-Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer





October 30, 2009
#### LAWRENCE E. BAUCOM, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 9826

August 25, 1978

583 P.2d 1082

*575
      *Morgan D. Harris,*Public Defender, and *James B. Gibson,*Deputy Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellant.

*Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *George E. Holt,*District Attorney, and *H. Leon Simon,*Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Convicted, by jury verdict, of robbery (NRS 200.380), appellant contends his conviction was not supported by the evidence. We disagree.

The record indicates that on June 5, 1976, the victim, Clarence Davenport, was walking through the El Cortez casino in Las Vegas, Nevada with about $150 in gaming chips in his hands. Appellant bumped into the victim and grabbed a hand full of the victim’s chips. The victim grabbed appellant’s thumb and attempted to retrieve his chips. A struggle ensued in which appellant repeatedly told the victim, “lam going to cut you. I am going to cut you.” Appellant finally escaped from the victim’s grasp, taking with him about $35 worth of chips.

The thrust of appellant’s argument is that the evidence fails to establish that the chips were taken by “force ... or fear of injury”, as required by NRS 200.380, and thus, the crime, if any, was larceny and not robbery.1 In our view the facts recited *576above amply support a taking by both force and fear of injury and, accordingly, appellant’s conviction will not be disturbed. Dalie v. State, 94 Nev. 10, 574 P.2d 271 (1978).

The district court judgment is affirmed.

NRS 200.380 provides, in pertinent part:

> “1. Robbery is the unlawful taking of personal property from the person of another, or in his presence, against his will, by means of force or violence or fear of injury, immediate or future, to his person or property, or the person or property of a member of his family, or of anyone in his company at the time of the robbery. Such force or fear must be used to obtain or retain possession of *576the property, or to prevent or overcome resistance to the taking, in either of which cases the degree of force is immaterial. If used merely as a means of escape, it does not constitute robbery.”