alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the quarterly report of Otelco Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael D. Weaver, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to my
      knowledge:




1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15
                (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.










/s/
      Michael D.
      Weaver


Michael
      D. Weaver


Chief
      Executive Officer


May
      9,
      2007
Exhibit 12

           INTERNATIONAL MULTIFOODS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

            Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                  (unaudited)

                                 (in thousands)



                                                    THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                    ------------------
                                                     May 31,    May 31,
                                                       1998       1997
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings (loss) before income taxes                 $(32,902)   $ 2,857
Plus: Fixed charges (1)                                6,078      7,766
Less: Capitalized interest                                 -         (9)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings available to cover
  fixed charges (2)                                      N/A    $10,614
=======================================================================
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (2)                   N/A       1.37
=======================================================================

(1) Fixed charges consisted of the following:

                                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                     -----------------
                                                      May 31,   May 31,
                                                       1998      1997
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest expense, gross                               $3,833    $5,422
Rentals (Interest factor)                              2,245     2,344
----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Total fixed charges                                 $6,078    $7,766
======================================================================

(2) For the three months ended May 31, 1998, earnings were inadequate to cover 
fixed charges by $32,902.  The deficiency was the result of unusual items as 
described in Note 4 to the consolidated condensed financial statements.  
Excluding unusual items, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges would have 
been 1.75 for the three months ended May 31, 1998.
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 31999D0514

**1999/514/EC: Commission Decision of 23 July 1999 setting the date on which dispatch from the United Kingdom of bovine products under the date-based export scheme may commence by virtue of Article 6(5) of Council Decision 98/256/EC (notified under document number C(1999) 2500)***Official Journal L 195 , 28/07/1999 P. 0042 - 0042*

COMMISSION DECISION

of 23 July 1999

setting the date on which dispatch from the United Kingdom of bovine products under the date-based export scheme may commence by virtue of Article 6(5) of Council Decision 98/256/EC

(notified under document number C(1999) 2500)

(1999/514/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market(1), as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC(2),

Having regard to Council Decision 98/256/EC of 16 March 1998 concerning emergency measures to protect against bovine spongiform encephalopathy, amending Decision 94/474/EC and repealing Decision 96/239/EC(3), as last amended by Commission Decision 98/692/EC(4), and in particular Article 6(5) thereof,

(1) Whereas Article 6(5) of Decision 98/256/EC requires the Commission to set the date on which dispatch of products referred to in this Article may commence, after having carried out Community inspections and after having informed the Member States;

(2) Whereas inspections carried out by the Commission services in the United Kingdom from 12 to 16 April 1999, in particular to assess the system of veterinary checks pursuant to Articles 6 and 7 and Annex III to Decision 98/256/EC, have shown that the conditions are complied with satisfactorily; whereas a follow-up inspection has been planned;

(3) Whereas at the time of adoption of Decision 98/692/EC, the Commission undertook to present, in accordance with its normal practice for inspection reports, to the Member States convened in the Standing Veterinary Committee, the results of the inspection referred to in Article 6(5) and the consequences it draws from them; whereas this presentation has taken place; whereas therefore, the date is set at 1 August 1999,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The date referred to in Article 6(5) of Decision 98/256/EC shall be 1 August 1999.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 July 1999.

For the Commission

Erkki LIIKANEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 395, 30.12.1989, p. 13.

(2) OJ L 62, 15.3.1993, p. 49.

(3) OJ L 113, 15.4.1998, p. 32.

(4) OJ L 328, 4.12.1998, p. 28.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB Amendment No. 1 for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard L. Browdy, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the report.











|      |                 |  |     |                                            | 
|----- | --------------- |  | --- | ------------------------------------------ | 
|Date: | August 15, 2007 |  | By: | /s/ RICHARDL. BROWDY                       | 
|      |                 |  |     | Richard L. Browdy, Chief Financial Officer |
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U. S. C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vistula Communications Services, Inc.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Rupert Galliers-Pratt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to
      my
      best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, adopted pursuant to §906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/RUPERT
                GALLIERS-PRATTRupert
                Galliers-PrattChief
                Financial Officer




Dated:
      August 20, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Vistula Communications Services, Inc.
      and
      will be retained by Vistula Communications Services, Inc. and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 28, 2011 

h1219 

Order 

 

December 28, 2011 

143729 & (13) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143729 

 COA: 304497 

TARRANCE L. CUMMINGS, a/k/a Wayne CC: 86-003739-FC 

TERRANCE CUMMINGS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 17, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). The motion for remand 

is DENIED.
#### KITCHEN FACTORS, INC., Appellant, v. E. T. and Y. S. BROWN, Respondents.

No. 7825

May 21, 1975

535 P.2d 677

*Paul J. Williams,*Reno, for Appellant.

*Jack S. Grellman,*Reno, for Respondents.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Attached to appellant’s opening brief, filed November 1, 1974, is an affidavit reflecting service that date upon respondents’ counsel. No answering brief has been filed; no extension of time to do so has been sought or granted; thus respondents’ answering brief is now more than five months overdue. See NRAP 31 (a).

This appeal is set for hearing on October 14, 1975. To indulge respondents further would not only delay final resolution of appellant’s claim, but would also preclude our assigning other, more concerned litigants the hearing time now scheduled for this cause. The number of matters we must accommodate on our hearing calendar no longer permits such indulgence.

Accordingly, we elect to treat respondents’ failure to file their answering brief as a confession of error. NRAP 31(c); Paso Builders, Inc. v. Hebard, 83 Nev. 165, 426 P.2d 731 (1967); Toiyabe Supply Co. v. Arcade, 74 Nev. 314, 330 P.2d 121 (1958). The judgment in respondents’ favor is reversed, with instructions to enter judgment in appellant’s *309favor in the sum of $1,365.72, proper interest, costs, and such attorneys’ fees as the district court finds appropriate in light of all services performed by appellant’s counsel, including those rendered on appeal.

In accord with NRS 18.060, appellant will be allowed its costs on appeal, upon the proper filing of a cost bill.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      of Diatect International Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for theyearended December 31,
      2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, David Andrus, Principal Executive Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








November
                  6, 2007
              /s/
                  David AndrusDavid
                  S. AndrusPrincipal
                  Executive OfficerPrincipal
                  Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Vistula Communications Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher S. Burke, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.§ 1350, adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | /s/CHRISTOPHER S. BURKEChristopher S. Burke
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

Dated:
November 19, 2004

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Vistula Communications Services, Inc. and will be retained by Vistula Communications
Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 11.4    
      

                                 EARNINGS PER SHARE
                             FULLY DILUTED COMPUTATION
                ($ in millions, except share and per share amounts)



                                                 Quarter Ended
                                                  December 31,        
                                              --------------------    


                                               1996          1995
                                              ------        ------
Basis for computation of earnings per 
 common and common equivalent shares:
   Earnings from continuing operations        $ 45.2        $ 34.7 
   Deduct dividends on 4 Percent
    cumulative preferred stock                   (.1)          (.1)
                                              -------       ------- 
   Earnings from continuing operations
    available to common shareholders            45.1          34.6
   Discontinued operations                      (1.7)         22.6
                                              -------       -------

   Available for common shareholders          $ 43.4        $ 57.2 
                                              =======       =======  



Number of shares:
   Weighted average shares outstanding     74,114,694   75,484,367
   Shares issuable upon exercise of 
    stock options, net of shares assumed
    to be repurchased                       1,772,926    1,181,659
                                           ----------   ----------
 
                                           75,887,620   76,666,026
                                           ==========   ==========



Earnings per common share:
   Continuing operations                        $ .59       $ .45
   Discontinued operations                       (.02)        .30
                                                ------      ------
  
   Net earnings                                 $ .57       $ .75
                                                ======      ======
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 6, 2015

NO. 03

- 15

- 00393

- CV

Mary Decker, Appellant

v.

Clifford Homes, LLC, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE RO SE, JUSTICES PEMBERT ON AND FIELD

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on June 23, 2015. Appel lant has

filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the

motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appea l. The

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appea l, both in this Court and the court below.
WHOLE COURT

NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be

physically received in our clerk’s office within ten

days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed.

http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/

April 16, 2015

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia

A13A0740.THOMPSONv.LAFARGE BUILDING MATERIALS,

INC.

DO-041

DOYLE, Presiding Judge.

In Thompson v. LaFarge Bldg. Materials, Inc.,

1 we reversed the trial court’s

grant of summary judgment to LaFarge Building Materials (“LaFarge”) on the basis

that a personal guaranty signed by Larry Thompson did not meet the requirements of

the Statute of Frauds. Thereafter, LaFarge petitioned for certiorari to the Georgia

Supreme Court, which the Court granted. In Lafarge Bldg. Materials, Inc. v.

Thompson, the Supreme Court reversed our decision, ruling that the personal

1

 323 Ga. App. 276 (746 SE2d 908) (2013).
guaranty met the requirements of the Statute of Frauds.

2 Consequently, we vacate our

previous opinion and adopt the Supreme Court’s opinion as our own.

Judgment affirmed. Phipps, C.J., Barnes, P.J., Ellington, P.J., McFadden,

Boggs and Branch, JJ., concur.

2

 295 Ga. 637, 641 (2) (763 SE2d 444) (2014).

2
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5293 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

3270 Firestone Boulevard in South Gate, California, as the ‘‘Henry 

C. Gonzalez Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2010 

Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California (for herself, Mr. BACA, Mr. BECERRA, 

Mr. BERMAN, Mr. CARDOZA, Ms. CHU, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. 

FARR, Mr. FILNER, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. HONDA, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, 

Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. RICHARDSON, 

Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. SCHIFF, 

Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. SPEIER, Ms. WATSON, and Ms. WOOLSEY) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3270 Firestone Boulevard in South Gate, California, as the ‘‘Henry C. Gonzalez Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HENRY C. GONZALEZ POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 3270 Firestone Boulevard in 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5293 IH

1 South Gate, California, shall be known and designated as 

2 the ‘‘Henry C. Gonzalez Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Henry C. Gonzalez 

7 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six
      months ended June 30, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Pawelek, Chief Executive
      Officer of South Texas Oil Company (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      August 19, 2008


*/s/*Michael
                J. PawelekMichael
              J. PawelekChief Executive Officer
### I N T H E S U P R EM E C O U R T STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2024 ND 136 Dondarro Jimmell Watts, Petitioner and Appellant
v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee No. 20240011 Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bonnie L. Storbakken, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Rina Morales-Holmes, Minot, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief. Dennis H. Ingold, Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.1 Watts v. State No. 20240011 Per Curiam. [¶1] Dondarro Watts appeals from a district court order denying his application for postconviction relief. A jury convicted Watts of indecent exposure. Watts appealed his conviction, and this Court affirmed. State v. Watts , 2023 ND 47, 988 N.W.2d 254. Watts filed an application for postconviction relief, asserting he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. After a hearing, the court held Watts did not demonstrate his trial counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. The court further held Watts did not demonstrate his trial counsel’s representation prejudiced him in any way. [¶2] Findings of fact made in a postconviction relief proceeding are subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review. Urrabazo v. State , 2024 ND 67, ¶ 6, 5 N.W.3d 521. After a full review of the record, we conclude the district court’s findings of facts are not clearly erroneous and the court did not err in determining Watts failed to establish ineffective assistance of counsel. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr