alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 210 (Tuesday, November 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 65934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21738]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

[MT-922-05-1310-FI-P; (MTM 93129)]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
MTM 93129

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Per 30 U.S.C. 188(d), the lessee, Quicksilver Resources Inc. 
timely filed a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease MTM 
93129, Hill County, Montana. The lessee paid the required rental 
accruing from the date of termination, April 1, 2005.
    No leases were issued that affect these lands. The lessee agrees to 
new lease terms for rentals and royalties of $10 per acre and 16\2/3\ 
percent or 4 percentages above the existing competitive royalty rate. 
The lessee paid the $500 administration fee for the reinstatement of 
the lease and $155 cost for publishing this Notice.
    The lessee met the requirements for reinstatement of the lease per 
Sec. 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). 
We are proposing to reinstate the lease, effective the date of 
termination subject to:
    <bullet> The original terms and conditions of the lease;
    <bullet> The increased rental of $10 per acre;
    <bullet> The increased royalty of 16\2/3\ percent or 4 percentages 
above the existing competitive royalty rate; and
    <bullet> The $155 cost of publishing this Notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen L. Johnson, Chief, Fluids 
Adjudication Section, BLM Montana State Office, PO Box 36800, Billings, 
Montana 59107, 406-896-5098.

    Dated: September 22, 2005.
Karen L. Johnson,
Chief, Fluids Adjudication Section.
[FR Doc. 05-21738 Filed 10-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5543 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the prohibition on collective 

bargaining with respect to matters and questions regarding compensation 

of employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs other than rates 

of basic pay, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2010 

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the prohibition on collective bargaining with respect to matters and 

questions regarding compensation of employees of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs other than rates of basic 

pay, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5543 IH

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION ON COLLECTIVE 

2 BARGAINING WITH RESPECT TO COMPENSA3 TION OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF4 FAIRS EMPLOYEES OTHER THAN RATES OF 

5 BASIC PAY. 

6 Subsections (b) and (d) of section 7422 of title 38, 

7 United States Code, are amended by striking ‘‘compensa8 tion’’ both places it appears and inserting ‘‘rates of basic 

9 pay’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
      23. 1














**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**








Implant
      Sciences Corporation


Wakefield,
      MA





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-3 (No.’s 333-109677, 333-111434, 333-117366, 333-124058, 333-127167) and Form
      S-8 (No's 333-42816, 333-111117) of our report dated September 20, 2006,
      relating to the consolidated financial statements which appears in the Annual
      Report to Shareholders, which is included in this Annual Report on Form
      10-K of Implant Sciences Corporation for the year ended June 30,
      2006.










/s/UHY
      LLP


Boston,
      MA





October
      12, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 211 (Wednesday, November 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 66423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21849]



[[Page 66423]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as a 
Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean 
Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR part 515).
    Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should 
not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, 
DC 20573.

Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation Intermediary 
Applicants

Caribbean West Indies Shipping Inc., 6710 Cornelius Street, 
Philadelphia, PA. Officers: Randolph Waithe, President. (Qualifying 
Individual) Mark K. Waithe, Director.
Embarque La Isla, Inc., 440 E. 182nd Street, Bronx, NY 10457. Officer: 
Nelson R. Bravo, President. (Qualifying Individual)
CN Worldwide B.V., Lichtenauerlaan 102-120, 3062 ME Rotterdam, The 
Netherlands. Officers: Tjeerd Greidanus, Director. (Qualifying 
Individual) Anita Ernesaks, Managing Director.

Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder 
Transportation Intermediary Applicants

Transmax Logistics Corporation, 1550 E. Higgins Road, Suite 114, Elk 
Grove Village, IL 60007. Officers: Sharia J. Lee, President. 
(Qualifying Individual) Lewis S. Lee, Director.
Unity Logistics And Transportation, Inc., 9010 S.W. 137th Avenue, Suite 
246, Miami, FL 33186. Officer: Pedro Streb, President. (Qualifying 
Individual).

Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicants

Euro Shippers Inc., 7667 West 95th Street, Suite 308, Hickory Hills, IL 
60457. Officer: Ulick M. O'Sullivan, President. (Qualifying 
Individual).
Smart International Cargo Express, Inc., 1841 Carter Avenue, (Esq. 176 
Street), Bronx, NY 10457. Officer: Eunice B. Acosta, President. 
(Qualifying Individual).
Carrie International Freight Services, LLC, 215 East Bay Street, Suite 
201-L, Charleston, SC 29401. Officer: Donald O. Montgomery, Member. 
(Qualifying Individual)
Macro Express Services, 4164 Sta Monica Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90029. 
Jabonillo Vincent, Sole Proprietor.

    Dated: October 28, 2005.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-21849 Filed 11-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### STATE v. LEWIS

No. 5 PC.

Case below: 17 N.C. App. 117.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 April 1973.
#### AETNA LIFE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. MARIE ROWAN, Respondent.

No. 21363

June 6, 1991

812 P.2d 350

*Keefer, O’Reilly, Ferrarlo & Eskin,*Las Vegas, for Appellant.

*Albert D. Massi,*Las Vegas, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

On May 2, 1989, respondent filed in the district court a complaint seeking damages against a third party for injuries that respondent received in an automobile accident. No answer was filed and, on January 22, 1990, the district court entered a default against the alleged tortfeasor. On February 6, 1990, appellant filed in the district court a motion to set aside the default pursuant to NRCP 55. Appellant also requested permission to file a complaint in intervention to defend against a claim by respondent for uninsured motorist benefits. *See*Allstate Insurance Co. v. Pietrosh, 85 Nev. 310, 454 P.2d 106 (1969). The district court denied both motions, and this appeal followed.

On August 22, 1990, this court entered an order noting potential jurisdictional defects. Specifically, we noted that orders denying motions to set aside defaults pursuant to NRCP 55 are not *363substantively appealable. *See*Long v. A-1 24 Hour Towing, 101 Nev. 682, 707 P.2d 1151 (1985); Kokkos v. Tsalikis, 91 Nev. 24, 530 P.2d 756 (1975). We also noted that because the district court denied appellant’s motion to intervene, appellant never became a party to the actions below. *See*Moore v. District Court, 77 Nev. 357, 364 P.2d 1073 (1961). Thus, we opined that the order denying appellant’s motion to intervene may not be substantively appealable. *See*NRAP 3A (permitting only aggrieved parties to appeal). Therefore, we directed appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

In response to this court’s order, appellant concedes that an order denying a motion to set aside a default is not substantively appealable. Appellant asserts, however, that an order denying a motion to intervene is substantively appealable, and cites cases from other jurisdictions to support its argument.

Appellant’s authorities are unpersuasive. In Moore v. District Court, 77 Nev. 357, 364 P.2d 1073 (1961), this court clearly held that a proposed intervenor does not become a party to a lawsuit unless and until the district court grants a motion to intervene. NRAP 3A confers a right to appeal only upon a *party*aggrieved by a judgment of a district court. Therefore, we conclude that an appeal cannot lie from an order of a district court that denies a motion to intervene. Review of such orders may be had in this court only by a petition for extraordinary relief.

Because appellant has failed to challenge a substantively appealable order, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.     | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15                (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| 2.     | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

| /s/ Curtis L. Garner, Jr.Curtis                      L. Garner, Jr.*Chief                      Financial Officer*November                      10, 2005 |   |   |  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--|

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1081921
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3424453
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4506374
<PP&E>                                        57100182
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3639197
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                60845654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4216040
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      50000
<COMMON>                                        918104
<OTHER-SE>                                    53364177
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  60845654
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3014631
<CGS>                                          3368329
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3368329
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              537871
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (890388)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    302000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (588388)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)
#### C. E. CARSON COMPANY, A CORPORATION, v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. 44040.

Decided October 5, 1942]

*Mr..Frederic M. Towers*for the plaintiff. *Mr. Norman B. Frost*and *Messrs.*Rent, *Weiehelt <& Hampton*were on the brief.

*Mr. L. R.*Mehlirisj.er,vwitlr-whom was *Mr. Assistant, Attpr- ■ ney General Francis M.*Shea, for the defendant.

*139Littleton, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The facts established by the record, in this case show that while plaintiff was the lowest bidder in response to an invitation for bids issued by the defendant for rental of gasoline locomotives in accordance with- certain definite specifications forming a part of the invitation for bids, all of which were to constitute the contract between the successful bidder and. the defendant, plaintiff was not the lowest qualified bidder. ......

. The locomotives which plaintiff proposed to furnish did not meet the requirements of the specifications, ‘ and the contracting officer so found. The defendant, through the contracting officer, rejected plaintiff’s bid,. None of the locomotives were ever received by the contracting officer, nor was any of them ever usedby the defendant. The only possession which any employee of the' United States ever had of any of plaintiff’s locomotives was for a short time on May 26, 1936, solely for the purpose of inspection and test of three locomotives by representatives of the Works Progress Administration. After this inspection and test they were left at the place where they were tested for such disposition as plaintiff desired to make of them. The Works Progress Administration did not at any time use any of plaintiff’s locomotives.

Plaintiff is not entitled to recover and the petition is dismissed. It is so ordered.

Madden, *Judge;*Jones, *Judge;*Whitakes, *Judge;*and Whaley, *Chief*Justice, concur.
**Exhibit32.1**

# ** **

# **Certification of theChief Executive Officer**

**Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of International Multifoods Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended August 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Gary E. Costley, theChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company, for the period covered by the Report.

 

 
|                         | /s/  Gary E. Costley                                     |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | **Gary E. Costley**                                      |
|                         | **Chairman  of the Board & Chief Executive Officer** |
|                         |                                                     |
|                         |                                                     |
| Date:  October 10, 2003 |                                                     |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Reward  Enterprises,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date:    November 12, 2004                      By:      /s/ Earl Ingarfield
                                                         -------------------
                                                Name:    Earl Ingarfield
                                                Title:   Chief Executive Officer


Date:    November 12, 2004                      By:      /s/ Earl Ingarfield
                                                         -------------------
                                                Name:    Earl Ingarfield
                                                Title:   Chief Financial Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other  document  authentications,   acknowledging,  or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required  by  Section  906,  has  been  provided  to  Reward
Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Reward Enterprises, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered January 10, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01263-CV

MARK JORDAN, Appellant

V.

JP BENT TREE, LP, JP ABERDEEN PARTNERS, LP, JP-2400 LAKESIDE, LP, RE 

CLOSING, LLC, AND JP-LAKESIDE JOINT VENTURE, Appellees

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-07168

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s unopposed motion for extension of time to file his brief. 

We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief received by the Clerk of the Court January 8, 

2020 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

MONAHAN, STEPHENS, and DEERWESTER

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Willy J. CANCEL

Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

No. 202000284

Decided: 30 March 2021

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary 

Military Judge: 

Kyle G. Phillips

Sentence adjudged 31 August 2020 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for 154 days, and a bad-conduct 

discharge.

For Appellant: 

Major Brian L. Farrell, USMCR

For Appellee:

Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
United States v. Cancel, NMCCA No. 202000284

Opinion of the Court

2

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. 

§§ 859, 866.

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130003 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130003 

 COA: 261940

 Grand Traverse CC: 98-007603-FC 

KEVIN CARTER HOLTZER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0522 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2006 

Clerk
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-51038

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARTURO VILLARREAL, JR., also known as Tati, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas

(W-95-CR-7-1)

September 7, 2001
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

AFFIRMED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.6.