alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1609-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida (FEMA-1609-DR), dated October 24, 2005, and related determinations. 

# DATES:

Effective: October 25, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of October 24, 2005:

Broward, Miami-Dade, and Palm Beach Counties for Individual Assistance (already designated for debris removal and emergency protective measures [Categories A and B] under the Public Assistance program, including direct Federal assistance.)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison, 

Acting Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency. 

[FR Doc. 05-22005 Filed 11-3-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed December 14, 2016.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-16-01053-CV

BRITTANY D. SANDOVAL1, Appellant

V.

EMCASCO INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-04443

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Evans, and Schenck

Opinion by Justice Schenck

This appeal concerns a default judgment, which was signed May 25, 2016. Appellant 

filed her notice of appeal on August 31, 2016. However, because the record does not reflect 

appellant filed a motion to modify the judgment, or request for findings of facts and conclusions 

of law, the notice of appeal was due no later than June 24, 2016, or with a timely extension 

motion, July 11, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1, 26.1.

By letter dated October 5, 2016, we directed appellant to provide the Court, no later than 

October 17, 2016, a letter brief explaining how the Court has jurisdiction over the appeal. See 

Garza v. Hibernia Natl. Bank, 227 S.W.3d 233, 233 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no 

pet.) (timely filing of notice of appeal is jurisdictional). We cautioned appellant that failure to do 

 1

 Brittany D. Sandoval, appearing pro se, filed the notice of appeal on behalf of herself and Clari Williams. A pro se party, however, 

cannot represent another party in litigation on appeal. See Laguan v. Lloyd, 493 S.W.3d 720, 721 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2016, no 

pet.). Because Williams did not sign the notice of appeal or otherwise make an appearance, she is not a party to this appeal. See id.
–2–

so could result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. By order dated October 19, 

2016, we granted appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file the jurisdictional letter brief 

and ordered her to file the brief no later than November 4, 2016. To date, appellant has not filed 

the letter brief, and nothing before us demonstrates our jurisdiction.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

161053F.P05

/David J. Schenck/

DAVID SCHENCK

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

BRITTANY D. SANDOVAL, Appellant

No. 05-16-01053-CV V.

EMCASCO INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-04443.

Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck. 

Justices Bridges and Evans participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee EMCASCO INSURANCE COMPANY recover costs of 

this appeal from appellant BRITTANY D. SANDOVAL.

Judgment entered this 14th day of December, 2016.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                     Washington, D.C. 20549

                           FORM 10-QSB
(Mark One)

[ x ]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

        For the quarterly period ended September 30, 1997

[   ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the transition period from __________ to __________

                      Commission file number: 0-2664

                       INVESTORS FINANCE, INC.
   (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
                        ___________________

		Hawaii				   99-0112763
	(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
	incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

	50 South Beretania Street, Honolulu, Hawaii	96813
	(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

                 Issuer's telephone number: (808) 533-7437
___________________

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or 
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such 
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days.  Yes [   ] No[ x ]

Number of shares outstanding of the issuer's common stock as of
September 30, 1997: 1,252,496.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes [  ]  No [ x ]
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-21-00305-CV

__________________

TOMMY LYNN COOPER, Appellant

V.

SUSAN CAROL BOLSTER, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 457th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 21-08-11490-CV

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 24, 2021, Tommy Lynn Cooper, Appellant, filed a notice of 

appeal from the trial court’s order dated September 22, 2021, granting a plea to the 

jurisdiction. Susan Carol Bolster, Appellee, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal 

because the appealed order is interlocutory and not subject to an accelerated appeal.

According to Bolster, the trial court has not yet resolved her claims regarding the 

validity of a transfer-on-death deed and attorney’s fees recovery. Cooper agrees his 

appeal is premature but asks this Court to abate the appeal until the trial court signs 
2

a final judgment. See Tex. R. App. P. 27.2 (“The appellate court may allow an 

appealed order that is not final to be modified so as to be made final and may allow 

the modified order and all proceedings relating to it to be included in a supplemental 

record.”). Rule 27.2 does not confer authority on the appellate court to abate an 

appeal while there are significant issues yet to be determined by the trial court. 

Garcia v. Comm’rs Ct. of Cameron Cty., 101 S.W.3d 778, 786 (Tex. App.—Corpus 

Christi 2003, no pet.).

We find that there are pending matters before the trial court that require 

development and resolution in the trial court before an appeal can commence. 

Accordingly, we grant Appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on December 8, 2021

Opinion Delivered December 9, 2021

Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 8- 35 08

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
Ro y L. Hous e, Jr

. ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__

__ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ct of M is so ur i - Kan sa s C it y

__

__ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Aug us t 1 2, 2 01 9 Fi le d: Aug us t 1 5, 2 01 9 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, GRUEND ER, an d KOBES, Ci rcu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Ro y Hou se , Jr

. ap pe al s aft er he pl ead ed gu il ty, un de r a pl ea ag r e e men t

co nt ai ni ng an ap pe al waiv er, to Hob bs Act ro b b e r y a nd a fir earm of fen se , an d th edi st ric t co ur t se nt en ced hi m , as a care er of fen de r, to a to ta l of 36 0 m on th s in pr is on

. 1 His co un se l se ek s to wit hd raw, an d ha s fil ed a br ie f un de r And ers v. Cal ifo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 73 8 (1 96 7 ) , a r g u i ng th at th e co ur t erre d in cl as si fy in g Hou se as a care er of fen de r, an d c ha ll en gi ng th e rea so na bl en es s o f th e se nt en ce.

W e wil l en fo rce th e ap pe al waiv er in th is cas e be cau se Hou se en te red in to th e pl ea ag reem en t an d th e ap pe al waiv er kn owi ng ly an d vo lu nt ari ly, hi s arg um en ts fal l wit hi n th e sc op e of th e ap pe al waiv er, an d no m is carr ia ge of jus ti ce wou ld res ul t fro m
en fo rci ng th e waiv er. See Uni te d Stat es v. Sco tt , 62 7 F.3 d 70 2, 70 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 10 ) (s ta nd ard of rev ie w); Uni te d St at es v. An di s, 3 33 F.3d 88 6, 8 89 –9 2 (8 th Cir . 20 03 ) (en ba nc ) (d is cu ss in g en fo rcem en t of ap pe al waiv ers ). Fu rth er, we ha ve in de pe nd en tl y rev ie wed th e reco rd un de r Pen so n v. Ohi o, 48 8 U.S. 75 (1 98 8) , an d ha ve fo un d no no n- fri vo lo us is su es fo r ap pe al fal li ng ou ts id e th e sc op e of th e ap pe al waiv er. Acco rd in gl y , we di sm is s th is ap pe al ba se d on th e a p p e a l w a i ve r, an d we gr an t co un se l l eav e to wit hd raw.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Ro se an n A. Ketc hm ark , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e f or th e 1 W es te rn Dis tri ct of M is so ur i.
-2

-
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Timberline Resources Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig Crowell, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 15, 2009

| |                                                                                                                          
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By:   /s/ Craig Crowell
_____________________________
Craig Crowell
Chief Accounting Officer
Principal Accounting Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
                         388 Greenwich Street, 7th Floor
                          New York, New York 10013-2396

June 11, 2001


Rabar Market Research, Inc.
10 Bank St. - Suite 830
White Plains, N.Y. 10606

Attention:  Mr. Paul Rabar

     Re: Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Mr. Rabar:

     We are writing with respect to your  management  agreements  concerning the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the "Management  Agreements").
We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2002 and
all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

o        Salomon Smith Barney Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
o        Smith Barney Diversified 2000 Futures Fund

     Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this
letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel  McAuliffe at the address
above or fax to  212-723-8985.  If you have any  questions  I can be  reached at
212-723-5435.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT LLC


By:       /S/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         ---------------------------------
         Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         Chief Financial Officer & Director

AGREED AND ACCEPTED

RABAR MARKET RESEARCH, INC.


By:      /S/ Paul Rabar
         ---------------------------------

Print Name:     Paul Rabar
             -----------------------------


DRMcA/sr
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

 

)

ROGELIO ACOSTA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 08-1318 (JR)

)

DONALD C. WINTER, )

Secretary of the Navy, )

)

Defendant. )

 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to

dismiss. 

Plaintiff is a former employee of the United States Navy at

Subic Bay, Philippines, whose formal employment discrimination

claim was dismissed on the ground that he failed to state a claim

of reprisal because he is an alien to whom Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), as amended, does not apply. 

See Compl., Attach. (November 5, 2007 Notice of Dismissal, DON

07-61581-02250) at 1-2. He alleges that he is a dual citizen of

the Philippines and of the United States because he was born in

1938 in the Philippine Islands when the Philippine Islands were a

United States territory. Compl. at 6. In this action, plaintiff

asks the Court to “confirm[] [his] having been born a US citizen”

such that the United States Navy “allow[s] [him] to have access
2

under [Title VII].” Id. at 7. 

In Licudine v. Winter, 603 F. Supp. 2d 129 (D.D.C. 2009),

this Court held that a person who, like plaintiff, was born in

the Philippine Islands when the Philippines was a United States

territory is neither a citizen nor a national of United States

citizen. Id. at 135-36. Such a person, then, is an alien to

whom Title VII does not apply. Id.

The Court will grant defendant’s motion to dismiss. An

Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

JAMES ROBERTSON

United States District Judge
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5331 

To revise the boundaries of John H. Chaffee Coastal Barrier Resources 

System Sachuest Point Unit RI–04P, Easton Beach Unit RI–05P, Almy 

Pond Unit RI–06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI–07 in Rhode Island. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2010 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To revise the boundaries of John H. Chaffee Coastal Barrier 

Resources System Sachuest Point Unit RI–04P, Easton 

Beach Unit RI–05P, Almy Pond Unit RI–06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI–07 in Rhode Island. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL 

4 BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The map subtitled ‘‘Sachuest 

6 Point Unit RI–04P, Easton Beach Unit RI–05P, Almy 

7 Pond Unit RI–06, Hazards Beach Unit RI–07’’, included 

8 in the set of maps entitled ‘‘John H. Chafee Coastal BarVerDate Mar 15 2010 21:11 May 19, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5331.IH H5331

hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5331 IH

1 rier Resources System’’ referred to in section 4(a) of the 

2 Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and 

3 relating to certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Re4 sources System units in Rhode Island, is hereby replaced 

5 by another map relating to the units entitled ‘‘John H. 

6 Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System Sachuest Point 

7 Unit RI–04P, Easton Beach Unit RI–05P, Almy Pond 

8 Unit RI–06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI–07’’ and dated 

9 September 30, 2009. 

10 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

11 shall keep the replacement map referred to in subsection 

12 (a) on file and available for inspection in accordance with 

13 the provisions of section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Re14 sources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### REDEVELOPMENT COMM. v. STEWART

No. 10 PC.

Case below: 3 N.C. App. 271.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 January 1969.
**Exhibit99.2**

 

 

**Certificationof the Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

                In connection withthe Quarterly Report of International Multifoods Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), John E. Byom, VicePresident, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

                (1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

                (2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company, for the period covered by the Report.

 

 
|   | /s/ John E. Byom                                           |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | **John  E. Byom**                                          |
|   | **Vice  President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer** |

 

 

Date:  October 8, 2002

 

 

----
----

----

I Akty, ktorých uverejnenie je povinné

----

NARIADENIE KOMISIE (ES) č. 1073/2004

z 4. júna 2004,

ktorým sa určujú paušálne dovozné hodnoty na určovanie vstupných cien určitých druhov ovocia a zeleniny

KOMISIA EURÓPSKYCH SPOLOČENSTIEV,

so zreteľom na Zmluvu o založení Európskeho spoločenstva,

so zreteľom na nariadenie Komisie (ES) č. 3223/94 z 21. decembra 1994 o uplatňovaní režimu dovozu ovocia a zeleniny (1), najmä na jeho článok 4 ods. 1,

keďže:

PRIJALA TOTO NARIADENIE:

Článok 1

Paušálne dovozné hodnoty uvedené v článku 4 nariadenia (ES) č. 3223/94 sú stanovené podľa údajov uvedených v tabuľke prílohy.

Článok 2

Toto nariadenie nadobúda účinnosť 5. júna 2004.

Toto nariadenie je záväzné vo svojej celistvosti a je priamo uplatniteľné vo všetkých členských štátoch.

V Bruseli 4. júna 2004

Za Komisiu

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

generálny riaditeľ pre poľnohospodárstvo

----

(1)Ú. v. ES L 337, 24.12.1994, s. 66. Nariadenie naposledy zmenené a doplnené nariadením (ES) č. 1947/2002 (Ú. v. ES L 299, 1.11.2002, s. 17).

----

PRÍLOHA

k nariadeniu Komisie zo dňa 4. júna 2004, ktorým sa určujú paušálne dovozné hodnoty na určovanie vstupných cien určitých druhov ovocia a zeleniny

----

(1)  Nomenklatúra krajín podľa nariadenia Komisie (ES) č. 2081/2003 (Ú. v. EÚ L 313, 28.11.2003, s. 11). Kód „999“ označuje „iné miesto pôvodu“.

----

----

NARIADENIE KOMISIE (ES) č. 1074/2004

zo 4. júna 2004,

ktorým sa ustanovujú prechodné opatrenia v sektore spracovaného ovocia a zeleniny na uplatňovanie nariadenia Komisie (ES) č. 1535/2003 z dôvodu pristúpenia Českej republiky, Estónska, Cypru, Lotyšska, Litvy, Maďarska, Malty, Poľska, Slovinska a Slovenska do Európskej únie

KOMISIA EURÓPSKYCH SPOLOČENSTIEV,

so zreteľom na Zmluvu o založení Európskeho spoločenstva,

so zreteľom na Zmluvu o pristúpení Českej republiky, Estónska, Cypru, Lotyšska, Litvy, Maďarska, Malty, Poľska, Slovinska a Slovenska,

so zreteľom na Akt o pristúpení Českej republiky, Estónska, Cypru, Lotyšska, Litvy, Maďarska, Malty, Poľska, Slovinska a Slovenska, najmä jeho prvý odsek článku 41,

keďže:

PRIJALA TOTO NARIADENIE:

Článok 1

Bez ohľadu na druhý odsek článku 10 a druhý pododsek článku 12 odsek 2 nariadenia (ES) č. 1535/2003 sa na hospodársky rok 2004/2005, v prípade rajčín, v Českej republike, v Estónsku, na Cypre, v Lotyšsku, v Litve, v Maďarsku, na Malte, v Poľsku, v Slovinsku a na Slovensku majú informácie uvedené v prvom odseku článku 10 a článku 12 odsek 1 tohto nariadenia poslať najneskôr desať dní pred začiatkom dodávok a najneskôr do 15. júla 2004.

Článok 2

Toto nariadenie nadobúda účinnosť tretí deň po jeho uverejnení v Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie.

Toto nariadenie je záväzné vo svojej celistvosti a je priamo uplatniteľné vo všetkých členských štátoch.

V Bruseli 4. júna 2004.

Za Komisiu

Franz FISCHLER

člen Komisie

----

(1)Ú. v. ES L 297, 21.11.1996, s. 29. Nariadenie naposledy zmenené a doplnené nariadením (ES) č. 386/2004 (Ú. v. EÚ L 64, 2.3.2004, s. 9).

(2)Ú. v. ES L 218, 30.8.2003, s. 14. Nariadenie naposledy zmenené a doplnené nariadením (ES) č. 444/2004 (Ú. v. EÚ L 72, 11.3.2004, s. 54).

----