alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 511 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 141
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 511

                          [Report No. 111-253]

    To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to terminate certain 
    easements held by the Secretary on land owned by the Village of 
     Caseyville, Illinois, and to terminate associated contractual 
                     arrangements with the Village.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2009

 Mr. Costello introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

                           September 10, 2009

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed





_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
    To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to terminate certain 
    easements held by the Secretary on land owned by the Village of 
     Caseyville, Illinois, and to terminate associated contractual 
                     arrangements with the Village.


 


    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF NRCS EASEMENTS AND ASSOCIATED CONTRACTUAL 
              ARRANGEMENTS, VILLAGE OF CASEYVILLE, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Termination Authorized.--The Secretary of Agriculture may 
terminate any easement held by the Secretary on land owned by the 
Village of Caseyville, Illinois, and terminate associated contractual 
arrangements with the Village.
    (b) Consideration.--As consideration for the termination of an 
easement and associated contractual arrangements under subsection (a), 
the Village of Caseyville, Illinois, shall enter into such compensatory 
arrangements with the Secretary as determined to be appropriate by the 
Secretary.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 141

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 511

                          [Report No. 111-253]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

    To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to terminate certain 
    easements held by the Secretary on land owned by the Village of 
     Caseyville, Illinois, and to terminate associated contractual 
                     arrangements with the Village.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 10, 2009

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed`
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Diatect International Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick
Carr, Principal Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





May
      18, 2009
              /s/ Patrick
  CarrPatrick
      CarrPrincipal
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) by OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. (the Company), I, Richard L. Browdy, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                   |  |  |  |     |  |                                           
|----- |  | ----------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | November 23, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard L. Browdy                     
|      |  |                   |  |  |  |     |  | Richard L. Browdy, Chief Financial Officer
# L_2007055EN.01001301.xml

| 23.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 55/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 55/13

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 176/2007

of 22 February 2007

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 958/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 22 February 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 22 February 2007, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 22 February 2007, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 shall be 28,125 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 February 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 February 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1585/2006 (OJ L 294, 25.10.2006, p. 19).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 49.

2

---
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-14-00447- CR

Jam es Eric G rant, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B ELL COUNTY , 264 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 671 68, TH E H ONO RAB LE MARTH A J. TRUDO , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant J ames Eric Gra nt seeks to appea l from a judgme nt adjudicating him g uilty of possession of a controlled substance. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42.12, §§ 5(b), 21, 23; Tex. Hea lth & Safety Code § 482.115. Sentence was imposed on J une 6, 2014. No motion for new trial
was filed. There fore , the deadl i n e fo r p er fecting appea l was J uly 7, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a) (1). Appellant filed his notice of appea l on J uly 17, 2014. No extension of time for filing the notice of appea l was reque sted. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Thus, appellant’ s notice of appea l, filed 41 day s afte r sentenc e was imposed, is untimely
. Absent a timely filed notice of appea l, we do not obtain jurisdiction to addre ss the merits of the appea l in a criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss the appea l for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State , 981 S.W .2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State , 918 S.W .2d 519, 522–23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Acc ording ly , we dismiss this appeal for w ant of jurisdiction.__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Jus tice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Oc tober 31, 2014 Do Not Publish

2
sndx-ex1019_442.htm



Exhibit 10.19

SYNDAX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

 

AMENDED & RESTATED

 

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION POLICY

 

Effective:  February 2, 2022

 

Each member of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) who is not also serving as an employee of Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) or any of its subsidiaries will receive the compensation described in this Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy for his or her Board service. This policy may be amended at any time in the sole discretion of the Board.

 

Each non-employee director serving on the Board of the Company will receive an annual base cash fee for his or her services of $41,400. Each non-employee director other than the non-executive chairperson of the Board (the “Chair”) shall also receive an annual award of deferred settlement restricted stock units to purchase 16,000 shares and the Chair shall also receive an annual award of deferred settlement restricted stock units to purchase 32,000 shares (each as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalization and similar events) of the Company’s common stock on the same date that the Board awards annual stock option grants to the Company’s executive officers (each an “Annual Option Award”). Each Annual Option Award will vest on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the director’s continued service to the Company.

 

Newly appointed non-employee directors will receive at the time of his or her appointment to the Board, a one-time initial award of options to purchase 35,000 shares (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalization and similar events) of the Company’s common stock (the “New Director Award”). Each New Director Award will vest monthly over a three-year period.

 

The Chair will also receive an annual cash retainer of $72,450 for his or her service in such role.

 

Each non-employee director, other than the chairperson of such committee, who serves on the following committees will receive an annual cash retainer, for each committee on which he or she serves, as listed below:

 


	
 
	
•
	
Audit committee – $10,350





	
 
	
•
	
Compensation committee – $7,765





	
 
	
•
	
Science & Technology committee – $7,765





	
 
	
•
	
Nominating and corporate governance committee – $5,175




 

Each chairperson of the audit, compensation, nominating and corporate governance and science and technology committees will receive an additional annual cash retainer as follows:

 


	
 
	
•
	
Audit committee – $20,700





	
 
	
•
	
Compensation committee – $15,525





	
 
	
•
	
Science & Technology committee – $15,525





	
 
	
•
	
Nominating and corporate governance committee – $10,350




 

The Company will also reimburse each of the directors for his or her travel expenses incurred in connection with his or her attendance at Board and committee meetings. All cash retainers will be paid in equal quarterly installments.
** **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                Denise L. Ramos                  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Denise                L. Ramos                      |
|   | Title:                Chief Financial Officer       |
|   | Furniture                Brands International, Inc. |
|   | May                15, 2007                         |
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14

                                PROMISSORY NOTE

$11,888,484.00                                                  Phoenix, Arizona
                                                               December 14, 2001



         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, HERMES ONETOUCH, L.L.C. (the "Maker"), hereby
promises to pay to the order of APOLLO GROUP, INC., AN ARIZONA CORPORATION, (the
"Payee"), on the "Maturity Date" (as defined herein) at such place as Payee may
designate in writing from time to time, in lawful money of the United States of
America the principal sum of Eleven Million Eight Hundred Eighty-eight Thousand
Four Hundred Eighty-four and No/100 Dollars ($11,888,484.00).

         Interest on the unpaid principal balance of this Note shall accrue at
the rate of six percent (6%) per annum from the date hereof and shall be added
to principal annually and paid at the Maturity Date of this Note.
Notwithstanding the previous sentence, however, in the event of early payoff of
this Note, accrued interest shall be added to the outstanding principal balance
for that period of time between the most recent anniversary date and the early
payoff date, as the case may be.

         The Maturity Date of this Note shall be the earlier of (i) the
anniversary date of this Note in the year 2021, or (ii) nine (9) months after
the death of John G. Sperling.

         Maker may prepay the whole or any part of this Note from time to time
without premium or penalty.

         Maker hereby waives presentment, demand, and notice of any kind in
connection with the enforcement or collection of this Note.

         If this Note is not paid when due, the Maker promises to pay all costs
of enforcement and collection and preparation therefor, including but not
limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, whether or not any action or proceeding
is brought to enforce the provisions hereof, including, without limitation, all
such costs incurred in connection with any bankruptcy, receivership, or other
court proceedings (whether at the trial or appellate level).

         This Note is governed by the laws of the State of Arizona.

         This Note shall be binding on the Maker and its successors and assigns.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker has caused this Note to be executed as of the
day and year first above written.


                                                  Hermes Onetouch, L.L.C.


                                                  ______________________________
                                                  By:   John G. Sperling
#### FRED L. EIKELBERGER and MARGARET A. EIKELBERGER, Appellants, v. JOHN L. TOLOTTI and MARY ELLEN TOLOTTI, Respondents.

No. 6558

December 30, 1974

530 P.2d 104

*Lohse and Lohse,*of Reno, for Appellants.

*Stewart, Horton & McKissick, Ltd.,*of Reno, for Respondents.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

This appeal is from a judgment by which the district court sought to adopt and implement the report of a court-appointed master, determining an accounting between appellants and respondents. The action primarily involved monetary disputes regarding operation of the Y-Rancho Trailer Park in Sparks, Nevada, for a period prior to October of 1966, as well as other issues relating to the parties’ business dealings.

*464The parties agree that because of a clerical error the district court gave respondents judgment for more than the master ascertained to be owing. But for such admitted clerical error appellants would owe respondents the principal sum of $404.53, if the master’s determinations had themselves all been correct. However, we believe the master incorrectly decided that appellants were accountable to respondents for $1,365.95 as the result of a transaction involving certain electric transformers.1 Hence, on claims litigated in this action, respondents owe appellants the principal sum of $961.42, plus interest.

It appears that in the belief that respondents had prevailed, the district court ordered appellants to pay the entire master’s fee, all costs, and a fee for respondents’ attorney. Of course, since respondents did not prevail, the award of attorney fees was clearly erroneous. The district court should reconsider the allocation of the master’s fee and costs, and an award of counsel fees to appellants, in the light of this opinion. In accord with NRS 18.060, appellants may claim their costs in this court by timely filing of a proper cost bill.

Other assignments of error have been considered and found to be without merit.

This matter is reversed and remanded for the limited purposes indicated above, and for entry of an appropriate amended judgment.

1

In our view, respondents have no just claim either to the transformers, which appellants purchased only because the power company wrongfully refused to supply them, or to the $1365.95 which appellants ultimately forced the power company to reimburse them for the transformers. The document under which appellants constructed the trailer park on which the transformers were placed provided: “The lessors [respondents] agree to pay over the sum of $30,000.00 to lessees [appellants], notwithstanding the fact that the 60 trailer rental spaces may be constructed for less than said sum.”
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions 10th Cir. R. 36.3.



### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 8/15/96 TENTH CIRCUIT

DONALD LEE ROGERS, Petitioner-Appellant,

v. JACK COWLEY, Respondent-Appellee. No. 96-6071 (D.C. No. CIV-95-995-A) (W.D. Okla.)



### ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before SEYMOUR , Chief Judge, KELLY and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Mr. Donald L. Rogers filed this pro se petition forwrit of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, raising five claims a s grounds for relief. The-2-

petition was referred to a magistrate judge who rec ommended that the court find Mr. Rogers’ first two claims procedurally barred, and all claims, including the first two, insufficient on the merits. After de no vo review, the district court adopted the magistrate’s report and recommendation in its entirety and denied Mr. Rogers’ petition. The district court also denied M r. Rogers’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis and his application for certificate of probable cause. Mr. Rogers appeals. In order to succeed on his motion for leave to proc eed in forma pauperis , Mr. Rogers must show: (1) a financial inability to pay the required filing fees and (2) the existence of a nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts in support of the issues raised on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); Coppedge v. United States , 369 U.S. 438 (1962); DeBardeleben v. Quinlan , 937 F.2d 502 (10th Cir. 1991). As noted by the district court, and as shown on the ap plication for in forma pauperis status, Mr. Rogers has $448.23 in his prison saving s account. Because Mr. Rogers failed to establish his inability to pay the filing fee, we deny his motion to proceed on appeal without prepayment of costs or fe es. ENTERED FOR THE COURT Stephanie K. Seymour Chief Judge
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection
with the accompanying Quarterly Report of SoftNet Technology Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the six month period ending June 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Jim Booth, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:





(1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) 
The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





By: /s/ Jim
Booth


Jim
Booth


President




Dated:  August 14,
2008