alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [Report No. 2733] 

                    Petitions for Reconsideration have been filed in the Commission's Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of these documents is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). Oppositions to these petitions must be filed by November 17,                           ( print page 66413)                        2005. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions have expired.                 

*Subject:*                     In the Matter of Provision of Directory Listing Information under the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended (CC Docket No. 99-273).                 

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     1.                 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05-21729 Filed 11-1-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 210 (Tuesday, November 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 65957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21680]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>10205 and <greek-i>10206]


Louisiana Disaster Number LA-00004

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 7.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1607-DR), dated 09/24/
2005.
    Incident: Hurricane Rita.
    Incident Period: 09/23/2005 and continuing.
    Effective Date: 10/15/2005.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/11/2006.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/26/2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: Small Business 
Administration, National Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 
Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 
6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Louisiana, dated 09/24/2005, is hereby 
amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical 
damages as a result of this disaster to 01/11/2006.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 05-21680 Filed 10-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6979

RONALD K. BILDERBECK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY; A. F. BEELER; PETER

LIBERO, Doctor; RICHARD SCHOTT; MACK BONNER,

Doctor; R. HALL, Doctor; HARRELL WATTS; MS.

PAQUARELLE; SAMUEL D. STANLEY, Doctor; K. M.

WHITE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior

District Judge. (5:06-ct-03106-H)

Submitted: November 6, 2007 Decided: November 19, 2007

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald K. Bilderbeck, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*

Bilderbeck also seeks on appeal to characterize his

negligence claims as state law claims over which the district court

had diversity jurisdiction, but because his pleadings in the

district court did not adequately assert this ground for relief we

do not consider it here. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. 

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ronald K. Bilderbeck appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his complaint asserting deliberate indifference

to medical needs and medical negligence pursuant to Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388

(1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680

(2000).*

 We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Bilderbeck v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-ct-03106-H (E.D.N.C.

Dec. 19, 2006 & Mar. 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and statements of income for Telos Corporation and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000320121
<NAME>                        Telos Corporation
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                             587,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,936,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       964,000
<INVENTORY>                                     12,390,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,257,000
<PP&E>                                          38,339,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,609,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 109,718,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,431,000
<BONDS>                                         56,875,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           47,193,000
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            78,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (38,944,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   109,718,000
<SALES>                                        129,337,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               253,787,000
<CGS>                                          114,462,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  218,430,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   490,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,455,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     80,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,332,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,412,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,412,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23 (a)
                                                                  --------------






                        Consent of Independent Auditors'
                        --------------------------------



The Board of Directors
Insilco Holding Co.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement Nos.
333-61809 and 333-61811 on Form S-8, and registration No. 333-63563 on Form S-3
of Insilco Holding Co. of our report dated February 17, 2000, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Insilco Holding Co. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1999, and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1999, and the related schedule, which
report appears in the December 31, 1999, annual report on Form 10-K of Insilco
Holding Co.

KPMG LLP


Columbus, Ohio
March 24, 2000
1 The Honorable James M. Moody, United St ates District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-3986

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Madison Flowers, Jr., also known as * Madison Junior Flowers, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 7, 2005 Filed: December 12, 2005

___________ Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Madison Flowers appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to distributing cocaine ba se, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Flowers’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under A nders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Flowers has filed a pro se supplemental brief.-2- We reject the arguments raised on app eal. A codefendant’s lesser sentence is not sufficient reason for setting aside Flowers’s sentence. SeeUnited States v. Pirani , 406 F.3d 543, 549 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (plain-error standard of review for unpreserved error), cert. denied ,126 S. Ct. 266 (2005); United States v. Buckendahl , 251 F.3d 753, 758-59 (8th Cir.) (noting that sentencing disparities between coconspirators do not serve as proper basis for se ntence reduction), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 1049 (2001). Any claim of ineffective assistance of couns el should be raised in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceedings. See United States v. Hughes , 330 F.3d 1068, 1069 (8th Cir. 2003). Having reviewed the record indepe ndently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of th e district court, a nd we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
Exhibit 12  
 
    INTERNATIONAL MULTIFOODS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES  
  
     Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges  
                     (unaudited)  
  
                   (in thousands)  
  
  
  
                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED  
                                            May 31,    May 31,  
                                              1997       1996  
------------------------------------------------------------- 
Earnings (loss) before income taxes        $ 2,857    $(1,082)  
Plus: Fixed charges (1)                      7,766      6,680  
Less: Capitalized interest                      (9)        (9)  
-------------------------------------------------------------  
Earnings available to cover  
  fixed charges                            $10,614    $ 5,589  
=============================================================  
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(2)         1.37        .84  
=============================================================  
  
(1) Fixed charges consisted of the following:  
 
                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED  
                                            May 31,    May 31,  
                                              1997       1996  
------------------------------------------------------------- 
Interest expense, gross                     $5,422     $4,389  
Rentals (Interest factor)                    2,344      2,291 
-------------------------------------------------------------  
  Total fixed charges                       $7,766     $6,680  
=============================================================  
  
(2) For the three months ended May 31, 1996 earnings were  
    inadequate to cover fixed charges by $1,091.  The   
    deficiency was the result of unusual items.  Excluding   
    the unusual items the ratio of earnings to fixed  
    charges would have been 1.38 for the three months ended   
    May 31, 1996.
# C_2007307EN.01000401.xml

| 18.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 307/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 307/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4703 — Fujitsu/GFI Informatique)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 307/04)

On 2 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4703. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4703. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
#### AL JOE HOGAN and CLEVON FAIRMAN, Appellants, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 7964

June 27, 1975

536 P.2d 1028

*Morgan D. Harris,*Public Defender, and *Theodore J. Manos,*Chief Deputy Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellants.

*Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *George Holt,*District Attorney, and *Sherman H. Simmons,*Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondents.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Convicted of grand larceny (NRS 205.220), appellants contend the evidence against them was insufficient.

The manager of Samons, Inc.’s store in Las Vegas testified he placed a boxed air conditioner, which he identified by serial number, in a shed within a fenced compound at the rear of Samons’ store. He saw it there only hours before the offense concerned herein.

Sheriff’s Lieutenant Charleboix, a patron of the store, apprehended appellants upon seeing them carrying the air conditioner from the compound to their car. As Charleboix confronted them, they apparently recognized him, saying such things as: “Come on, Charlie. Give us a break. We will put it back.”

Contrary to appellants’ contentions, we think the evidence *421adequately supported a finding of felonious asportation, and justified the jury in rejecting appellants’ assertions that they found the air conditioner outside the fence and believed it was abandoned.
#### Samuel COLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 61292.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 29, 2003.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate District Defender, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before: ULRICH, P.J., and HOWARD and NEWTON, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Samuel Cole appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, Cole alleges the hearing court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion because he was denied effective assistance of counsel in that counsel induced him to plead guilty by telling him he would return to prison with an additional ten-year sentence if he did not plead guilty in exchange for probation. As *891a result, Cole argues his guilty plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 211 (Wednesday, November 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 66483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21876]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review, Request 
for Comments; Renewal of an Approved Information Collection Activity, 
Training and Qualification Requirements for Check Airmen and Flight 
Instructors

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The rule allows some experienced pilots who would otherwise 
qualify as flight instructors or check airmen, but who are not 
medically eligible to hold the requisite medical certificate, to 
perform flight instructor or check airmen functions in a simulator.

DATES: Please submit comments by December 2, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy Street on (202) 267-9895.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

    Title: Training and Qualification Requirements for Check Airmen and 
Flight Instructors.
    Type of Request: Renewal of an approved collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0600.
    Form(s): None.
    Affected Public: A total of 3,000 pilots.
    Frequency: The recordkeeping is conducted as an as-needed basis.
    Estimated Average Burden Per Response: Less than one minute.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An estimated 12.5 hours annually.
    Abstract: The rule allows some experienced pilots who would 
otherwise qualify as flight instructors or check airmen, but who are 
not medically eligible to hold the requisite medical certificate, to 
perform flight instructor or check airmen functions in a simulator.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20503, Attention: FAA Desk Officer.
    Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the Department, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimates of the burden of 
the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, 
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to 
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 26, 2005.
Judith D. Street,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, Information Systems and 
Technology Services Staff, ABA-20.
[FR Doc. 05-21876 Filed 11-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 2004N-0516]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “2005 Food Safety Survey” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Robbins, Office of Management Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of May 24, 2005 (70 FR 29768), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under  44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0345.   The approval expires on February 30, 2008.                

                    A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets*.                

Dated: October 17, 2005.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-21157 Filed 10-21-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S