United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

L.H., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, FENKELL STATION, 

Detroit, MI, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0100

Issued: July 19, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Alan J. Shapiro, Esq., for the appellant1

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER REMANDING CASE

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

On October 29, 2020 appellant, through counsel, filed a timely appeal from an August 26, 

2020 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP).2 The Clerk of 

the Appellate Boards docketed the appeal as No. 21-0100.

On July 22, 2019 appellant, then a 60-year-old carrier technician, filed a traumatic injury 

claim (Form CA-1) alleging that on July 17, 2019 she struck her left knee on the door of the union 

office while in the performance of duty. She returned to limited-duty work on July 22, 2019 after 

 

1

In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for legal 

or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). 

No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board. Id. An attorney or 

representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, subject to fine or 

imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also 18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of fees to a 

representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation.

2 The Board notes that, following the August 26, 2020 decision, OWCP received additional evidence. However, 

the Board’s Rules of Procedure provides: “The Board’s review of a case is limited to the evidence in the case record 

that was before OWCP at the time of its final decision. Evidence not before OWCP will not be considered by the 

Board for the first time on appeal.” 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c)(1). Thus, the Board is precluded from reviewing this 

additional evidence for the first time on appeal. Id.
2

seeking medical care. OWCP assigned the claim OWCP File No. xxxxxx249 and accepted it for 

left knee contusion on November 26, 2019.

On December 6, 2019 appellant filed a claim for intermittent wage-loss compensation 

(Form CA-7) for the period November 25 through December 6, 2019.

By decision dated February 13, 2020, OWCP denied appellant’s claim for intermittent 

disability from November 25 through December 6, 2019. On February 27, 2020 appellant, 

through counsel, requested an oral hearing before a representative of OWCP’s Branch of Hearings 

and Review.

By decision dated August 26, 2020, OWCP’s hearing representative denied appellant’s 

claimed period of intermittent work-related disability. She noted that appellant had a prior claim 

for a right knee injury under OWCP File No. xxxxxx253 and further noted that she had filed a 

prior claim for a left knee consequential injury under OWCP File No. xxxxxx888.

The Board, having duly considered the matter, finds that the case is not in posture for 

decision.

Appellant has a previously accepted traumatic injury claim under OWCP File No. 

xxxxxx253 for bilateral knee contusions and internal derangement of the right knee. She also 

previously filed an occupational disease claim under OWCP File No. xxxxxx888 for aggravation 

of her left knee condition, which OWCP denied in decisions dated May 11 and 

November 15, 2017.

OWCP’s procedures provide that cases should be administratively combined when correct 

adjudication of the issues depends on frequent cross-referencing between case files.3 For example 

if a new injury case is reported for an employee who previously filed an injury claim for a similar 

condition or the same part of the body, doubling is required.4

As the present claim under OWCP File No. xxxxxx249 and the claims under OWCP File 

Nos. xxxxxx253 and xxxxxx888 involve injuries to appellant’s left knee, they must be 

administrative combined for a full and fair adjudication.5 This will allow OWCP to consider all 

relevant claim files and accompanying evidence in developing her claim for employment-related 

disability.6

 

3 Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 2 -- Claims, File Maintenance & Management, Chapter 2.400.8c 

(February 2000); T.D., Docket No. 20-1119 (issued January 29, 2021); R.R., Docket No. 19-0368 (issued 

November 26, 2019).

4 See S.H., Docket No. 20-1440 (issued March 12, 2021); M.B., Docket No. 20-1175 (issued December 31, 2020).

5

Id.

6 L.E., Docket No. 20-1178 (issued March 3, 2021); B.M., Docket No. 20-0955 (issued November 30, 2020).
3

Accordingly, the Board will remand the case to OWCP to administratively combine the 

present claim with OWCP File Nos. xxxxxx888 and xxxxxx253. Following this and other such 

further development as deemed necessary, OWCP shall issue a de novo decision.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the August 26, 2020 decision of the Office of 

Workers’ Compensation Programs is set aside and the case is remanded for further proceedings 

consistent with this order of the Board.

Issued: July 19, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board