alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Edward W. Hooper, petitioner.

Suffolk.

March 22, 1876.

Devens *&*Lord, JJ., absent.

The guardian of an insane person may be authorized, under the Gen. Sts. *c.*109, § 22, to invest all the property of the ward in the purchase of an annuity upon his life.

Petition by Edward W. Hooper, setting forth that he was the duly appointed guardian of Jane M. Bacon, a widow and an insane person; that her property consisted solely of money deposits to the amount of $4394.65, besides wearing apparel and similar personal effects, and was subject to certain debts; that the income of her property was wholly insufficient for her comfortable maintenance; that she had no issue living, but had two brothers and a sister said to be living at various designated places out of the Commonwealth; that the property might be more advantageously used for the ward in the purchase of an *103annuity than in any other way, and could in no other way he made to afford her a sufficient and certain support, and prayed for the authorization of the court, under the Gen. Sts. *e.*109, § 22, for the investment of the whole of the ward’s property in an annuity on her life.

Upon this petition, notice was ordered by mailing to the brothers and sister of the ward copies of the abstract of the petition and of the order thereon, and by publication thereof.

Upon the hearing upon the petition, by *Devens,*J., he found that the notices ordered had been given; that it would be for the interest of the ward that the money should be expended in the manner prayed for in the petition; and reserved for the opinion of the full court the question whether an order to that effect could properly be made.

*J. G. Ropes,*for the petitioner,

cited *Kendall*v. *May,*10 Allen, 59, 66 ; *May*v. *May,*109 Mass. 252, 256 ; *Ex parte Chumley,*1 Ves. Jr. 296 ; *Ex parte Dikes,*8 Ves. 79 ; *Ex parte Hastings,*14 Ves. 182 ; *Ex parte Stonard,*18 Ves. 284 ; *Davies*v. *Davies,*2 De G., M. *&*G. *51 ; In re Dodsworth,*10 Hare, 16 ; *In re Ward,*29 L. J. (N. S.) Ch. 784 ; *In re Persse,*3 Molloy, 94 ; Shelford on Lunacy, 199.

No counsel appeared to oppose the petition.

The Court, under the Gen. Sts. *c.*109, § 22, made the

*Order prayed for.*
## NUMBER 13

- 2 2

- 00 3 76

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN RE BERRY CONTRACTING, LP D/B/A

BAY LTD. AND JUAN HERNANDEZ

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

.



## ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

By petition for writ of mandamus, r elators Berry Contracting, LP d/b/a Bay Ltd. and

Juan Hernandez seek to set aside a July 28, 2022 order concluding that relators “have

failed to prove the affirmative defense of exclusive remedy” in a case concerning workers’

compensation. See T EX

. L AB

. C O DE A NN

. § 408.001(a). By motion to stay, relators seek

to stay the underlying proceedings, including the August 22, 2022 trial of this matter.

Th is Court, having examined and fully considered the relators’ motion to stay, is of

the opinion that it should be granted. Accor dingly, we grant the relators’ motion to stay2 and order the trial court proceedings to be stayed pending f urther order of this Court

, or

until this case is finally decided

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.10(b). The Court requests that the

real part ies in interest , Gernal Mann and Jennifer Mann, or any others whose interest

would be directly affected by the relief sought

, f ile a response to the petition for writ of

mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See id. R.

52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

16 th day of Au gust , 202 2

.
**
**Exhibit 31**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, JoshuaR. Peterson, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of SanJuan Basin Royalty Trust, for which Compass Bank acts as Trustee; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrantand I have: 

 
 a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 
 
 b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes; 
 
 c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
 
 d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors: 

 
 a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
 
 b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves persons who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 16, 2018 

 
/s/ Joshua R. PetersonBy: Joshua R. Peterson Vice President and Senior Trust Officer Compass Bank**
** **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   | W.                G. Holliman                       |
|   | Title:                Chief Executive Officer       |
|   | Furniture                Brands International, Inc. |
|   | May                10, 2007                         |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         811,974
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  825,364
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,843,425
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,540,340
<PP&E>                                       1,260,025
<DEPRECIATION>                                 921,022
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,979,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          490,382
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,487,478
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,979,272
<SALES>                                      5,400,907
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,476,569
<CGS>                                        3,273,322
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,205,795
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (729,226)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (730,026)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
----

|   | (1) | The      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the      company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      January 15, 2009 |                                                                                        |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |                                                                                        |   |
|                        |                                                                                        |   |
| By:                         | /s/ David Collins                                                                           |   |
|                        | David      Collins                                                                          |   |
|                        | Chief      Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Principal Financial      Officer |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM
BSD MEDICAL CORPORATION FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                                1,689,029
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            59,266
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                             908,241
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      2,698,084
<PP&E>                                                  773,883
<DEPRECIATION>                                          686,790
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        2,797,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   761,924
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                166,940
<OTHER-SE>                                            1,706,229
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          2,797,917
<SALES>                                                 596,441
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        620,221
<CGS>                                                   632,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         2,094,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        546,452
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        3,630
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (1,928,050)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (1,928,050)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1,928,050)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.12)


</TABLE>
ACCEPTED12-14-00201-CRTWELFTH COURT OF APPEALSTYLER, TEXAS5/27/2015 11:04:40 AMCATHY LUSKCLERK
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.27

                        FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT

This First Amendment to Loan Agreement (this "Amendment"), dated and effective
as of March 29, 2002 is entered into between Cell Robotics International, Inc.
(the "Borrower") and Oton Tisch ("Lender").

                             PRELIMINARY STATEMENTS

         A. Borrower and Lender have entered into that certain Loan Agreement
(herein so called) dated August 2, 2001.

         B. Borrower has executed and delivered to Lender a promissory note
dated the date hereof in the face amount of $2,000,000 (the "March 2002 Note").

         C. In connection with the issuance of the March 2002 Note, Borrower and
Lender desire to amend Article 1 of the Loan Agreement as set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

                                    AGREEMENT


1.       The definition of Indebtedness contained in Article 1 of the Loan
         Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

              "'Indebtedness' shall mean all indebtedness, liabilities and
              obligations owing, arising, due or payable from the Borrower to
              the Lender under the Note or that certain Promissory Note dated
              March 29, 2002 in the face amount of $2,000,000 executed by
              Borrower and payable to the order of Lender."

2.       Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, all terms and
         conditions of the Loan Agreement remain in full force and effect.


CELL ROBOTICS INTERNATIONAL, INC.


By:      /s/ Ronald K. Lohrding                     By:  /s/ Oton Tisch
         -----------------------------------             -----------------------
         Ronald K. Lohrding                                  Oton Tisch
         President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2007114EN.01000201.xml

| 24.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4346 — NTN/SNR)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 114/03)

On 27 March 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4346. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4346. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
<PAGE>
                                                       Exhibit 21
                            The Advest Group, Inc.
                                       
                             List of Subsidiaries

                                                     Jurisdiction      Present
   Name                                        Where Incorporated     Ownership
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-

Advest, Inc.                                             Delaware          100%
   Advest Insurance Agency, Inc.                    Massachusetts          100%
   Balanced Capital Services, Inc.                    Connecticut          100%
   Vercoe Insurance Agency, Inc.                             Ohio          100%

Advest Bank                                           Connecticut          100%
   Admass Corp.                                     Massachusetts          100%
   Admyst Corp.                                       Connecticut          100%
   Advest Mortgage Corp (formerly
          Advantage Service Corp.)                    Connecticut          100%
   Advest Credit Corporation                          Connecticut          100%
   A.B. Realty Corp.                                  Connecticut          100%
   Laurel Woods Development Corp.                     Connecticut          100%
   Salem Corp. of CT                                  Connecticut          100%

Advest Capital, Inc.                                  Connecticut          100%

Advest Transfer Services, Inc.                           Delaware          100%

Bank Street Management Company                        Connecticut          100%

Billings & Company, Inc.                              Connecticut          100%
   Billings Management Co.                            Connecticut          100%

Boston Security Counsellors, Inc.                   Massachusetts          100%

Central Row Corp.                                     Connecticut          100%

SRNY, Ltd. (formerly Shore & Reich, Ltd.)             Connecticut          100%
   Coordinated Planning, Ltd.                            New York          100%

                                       -57-
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3906

_____________________________
N ADER G. A BDELMASIH , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Russell Healey , Judge

. June 26, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R OBERTS , R OWE , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Nader G. Abdelmasih, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 21

Private Media Group, Inc. Subsidiaries



|                                    |  |                       
|----------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                  |  | Place of Incorporation
|Cine Craft, Ltd.                    |  | GIBRALTAR             
|Coldfair Holdings Limited           |  | CYPRUS                
|Fraserside Holdings Ltd.            |  | CYPRUS                
|Peach Entertainment Distribution AB |  | SWEDEN                
|Milcap Media Group S.L.U.           |  | SPAIN                 
|Private Media Group Services S.L.   |  | SPAIN                 
|Private Benelux B.V.                |  | THE NETHERLANDS       
|Private France SAS                  |  | FRANCE                
|Private North America, Ltd.         |  | U.S. (California)     
|Barbuda B.V.                        |  | THE NETHERLANDS       
|Ceresland S.L.                      |  | SPAIN                 
|Private Media Group Canada, Inc.    |  | CANADA                
|Fraserside IP LLC                   |  | U.S. (Iowa)           
|ThinkForward, Inc.                  |  | U.S. (California)     
|GreenCine, Inc.                     |  | U.S. (Delaware)       
|Mamas LLC                          |  | U.S. (Delaware)       
|GameLink LLC                        |  | U.S. (Delaware)       
|eLine LLC                           |  | U.S. (Delaware)       
|Sureflix Digital Distribution, Inc. |  | U.S. (Delaware)       
|Entruphema, Inc.                    |  | CANADA
#### Tony IRVINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joe FERNALD; et al., Defendants, Bruce Toney; NFN Williams, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-11225.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided April 20, 2005.

Tony Irvine, Huntsville, TX, pro se.

Before JONES, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

*589PER CURIAM: *

Tony Irvine, Texas prisoner No. 1122042, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his pro se and in forma pauperis civil rights complaint for failure to exhaust prison administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Irvine does not dispute that he has failed to comply with the requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), but he argues that the dismissal of his complaint with prejudice for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis violates his right of access to the courts. Irvine also challenges the district court’s decision to sever and transfer his claims against defendants employed at the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Wynne Unit to the Southern District of Texas, which is where those claims arose.

We find no error in the dismissal of claims for failure to exhaust prison administrative remedies. *Porter v. Nussle,*534 U.S. 516, 532, 122 S.Ct. 983, 152 L.Ed.2d 12 (2002); *Booth v. Churner,*532 U.S. 731, 741, 121 S.Ct. 1819, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001). The dismissal will have no effect on Irvine’s ability to bring a paid complaint raising the same allegations. *Underwood v. Wilson,*151 F.3d 292, 296 (5th Cir.1998). The decision to sever and transfer certain of Irvine’s claims was within the district court’s broad discretion. *Mills v. Beech Aircraft Corp.,*886 F.2d 758, 761 (5th Cir.1989); *Williams v. Hoyt,*556 F.2d 1336, 1341 (5th Cir.1977).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.