alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2007051EN.01001801.xml

| 20.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 51/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 51/18

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 15 February 2007

amending the Decision of 27 March 2000 authorising the Director of Europol to enter into negotiations on agreements with third States and non-EU related bodies

(2007/117/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Article 42(2), Article 10(4) and Article 18 of the Convention on the establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention) (1),

Having regard to the Council Act of 3 November 1998 laying down rules governing Europol's external relations with third States and non-European Union related bodies (2), and in particular Article 2 of that Act,

Having regard to the Council Act of 3 November 1998 laying down rules governing the receipt of information by Europol from third parties (3), and in particular Article 2 of that Act,

Having regard to the Council Act of 12 March 1999 adopting the rules governing the transmission of personal data by Europol to third States and third bodies (4), and in particular Articles 2 and 3 of that Act,

Whereas:

| (1) | Operational requirements and the need to combat in an effective way organised forms of criminality through Europol, require that Montenegro be added to the list of third States with which the Director of Europol is authorised to start negotiations. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Operational requirements and the need to combat in an effective way organised forms of criminality through Europol, require that Montenegro be added to the list of third States with which the Director of Europol is authorised to start negotiations.

| (2) | Council Decision of 27 March 2000 (5) should therefore be amended, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Council Decision of 27 March 2000 (5) should therefore be amended,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Article 2(1) of the Council Decision of 27 March 2000 under the heading ‘Third States’, the following State shall be added to the alphabetical list:

| ‘— | Montenegro’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

Montenegro’.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 15 February 2007.

For the Council

The President

W. SCHÄUBLE

---

(1)  
  OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 2. Convention as last amended by a Protocol amending that Convention (OJ C 2, 6.1.2004, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ C 26, 30.1.1999, p. 19.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 26, 30.1.1999, p. 17.

3

(4)  
  OJ C 88, 30.3.1999, p. 1. Council Act as amended by the Council Act of 28 February 2002 (OJ C 76, 27.3.2002, p. 1).

4

(5)  
  OJ C 106, 13.4.2000, p. 1. Decision as last amended by Council Decision of 4 December 2006 (OJ C 311, 19.12.2006, p. 10).

5

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      179,607
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      1,141
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          54,616
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        14,786
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 250,150
<COMMON>                                         5,748
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       55,404
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             21,413
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  82,565
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            8,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            72,456
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              23,270
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       72,800
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    1,600
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      1,678
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   422
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  61,837
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  250,150
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      215,152
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             4,683
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     194,283
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     198,966
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         16,186
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 945
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  17,131
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         7,465
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,666
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        696
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    8,970
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         6,155
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        5,889
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          11,685
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.57
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                                               

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the balance sheet and income statement, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial schedules.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              50
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      498
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21
<INVENTORY>                                        507
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1200
<PP&E>                                            1539
<DEPRECIATION>                                     565
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1333
<BONDS>                                            950
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         11
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                         760
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3944
<SALES>                                           1846
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1846
<CGS>                                             1111
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  76
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (319)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        31
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (350)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      (8)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (358)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (4.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.92)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2007185EN.01000501.xml

| 8.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 185/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 185/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4763 — Cerberus/Torex)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 185/03)

On 31 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4763. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4763. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13

                                 ASPENBIO, INC.


Number of Shares: 100,000        Date of Grant:                  August 21, 2001

                             STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

AGREEMENT made this 21st day of August, 2001, between ("Optionee"), and
AspenBio, Inc., a Colorado corporation ("Company").

         1. Grant of Option. The Company, hereby grants to the Optionee, subject
to the terms and conditions set forth or incorporated herein, an Option to
purchase from the Company all or any part of an aggregate of Common Shares, as
such Common Shares are now constituted, at the purchase price of $1.00 per
share.

         2. Exercise. The Option evidenced hereby shall be exercisable in whole
or in part (but only in multiples of 10,000 Shares unless such exercise is as to
the remaining balance of this Option) on or after and on or before August 20,
2006, provided that the cumulative number of Common Shares as to which this
Option may be exercised shall not exceed the following amounts:

<Table>
<Caption>
             Cumulative Number                             Prior to Date
                of Shares                               (Not Inclusive of)
          --------------------------                    ------------------
<S>                                                     <C>
                 100,000                                  August 20, 2006
</Table>


The Option evidenced hereby shall be exercisable by the delivery to and receipt
by the Company of (i) a written notice of election to exercise; (ii) accompanied
by payment of the full purchase price thereof in cash or certified check payable
to the order of the Company, and (iii) by return of this Stock Option Agreement
for endorsement of exercise by the Company.

         3. Transferability. The Option evidenced hereby is NOT assignable or
transferable by the Optionee, except with the Company's consent.

AspenBio, Inc.


By:           /s/ Roger Hurst                                8-21-01
     --------------------------------           --------------------------------
     Roger Hurst, President                     Date


Optionee:


             /s/ Gail Schoettler
-------------------------------------           --------------------------------
     Gail Schoettler                            Social Security or Tax ID #


                  8100 Southpark Way, B-1 . Littleton, CO 80120
                       (303) 794-2000 . Fax (303) 798-8332
                               www.aspenbioinc.com
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Matthew C. Lords, Vice President and Secretary, of Syntony Group, Inc.
(the "Registrant"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Registrant;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Quarterly Report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
Quarterly Report;

     4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)
for the Registrant and I have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the Registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within
          those entities, particularly during the period in which this
          Quarterly Report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure
          controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
          filing date of this Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this Quarterly Report my conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
          My evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
          internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's
          ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
          and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material
          weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's
          internal controls.

Dated: May 15, 2006                  Signature:/s/Matthew C. Lords
                                     Matthew C. Lords
                                     Vice President and Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 541 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 541

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an inflation 
 adjustment of the base amounts used to determine the amount of Social 
              Security benefits included in gross income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2009

 Mr. Platts (for himself and Mr. Coble) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an inflation 
 adjustment of the base amounts used to determine the amount of Social 
              Security benefits included in gross income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Tax Relief Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. INFLATION ADJUSTMENT OF BASE AMOUNTS USED TO DETERMINE SOCIAL 
              SECURITY BENEFITS INCLUDED IN GROSS INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 86 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to base amount and adjusted base amount) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Cost-of-living adjustment.--In the case of any 
        taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 2009, each 
        dollar amount contained in paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be 
        increased by an amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins, by substituting `calendar year 
                2008' for `calendar year 1992' in subparagraph (B) 
                thereof.
        If any increase determined under the preceding sentence is not 
        a multiple of $50, such increase shall be rounded to the next 
        lowest multiple of $50.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
#### In re Petition of JAMES M. CAIN, Petitioner.

No. 12296

June 4, 1980

611 P.2d 1092

*James M. Cain,*in proper person.

*Samuel S. Lionel,*and *Thomas E. Lea,*Las Vegas, for Respondents, the State Bar of Nevada and the Board of Bar Examiners.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

James M. Cain did not receive a passing grade on the 1979 *484Nevada bar examination. Therefore, the Board of Bar Examiners recommended that he not be admitted to practice law in Nevada. Cain has petitioned for review.

The basis of Cain’s petition is that the method of scoring the examination was improper. He argues that the assignment of scale scores to the essay portion of the examination in determining his final score was arbitrary and capricious, and distorted his essay scores with respect to his score on the multistate portion of the examination in violation of SCR 651 and our holding in In re Claerhout, 95 Nev. 86, 590 P.2d 620 (1979).

In *Claerhout*we held that the method of scoring the 1978 examination violated SCR 65 because “the examination’s two halves [did not receive] equal weight in all cases.” *Id.*at 88, 590 P.2d at 621. The crux of the problem in *Claerhout*was stated as follows, *id.*at 87-88, 590 P.2d 620-621:

> The multistate scores were not equated or scaled to the essay scores in any even manner. Rather, different applicants received varying percentage-value scores for each multistate question correctly answered. Those with the higher raw scores were assigned a smaller percentage value for each correct question, as compared with those having lower raw scores. Thus, because percentage grades were unevenly assigned, to the raw multistate scores, certain applicants, whose high raw multistate scores were combined with relatively low essay scores, failed, while applicants achieving low raw multistate scores, along with relatively high essay grades, passed.

Such a problem does not.exist here. Both the essay and mul-tistate halves of the 1979 examination were assigned scale scores. Thus, ah applicant ivho received a high raw multistate score and a low raw essay score did not find himself in the same predicament as a similar applicant in *Claerhout.*Since the scores of both halves of the 1979 examination were scaled, an applicant with a high raw multistate score and low raw essay score was accorded the same treatment as an applicant with a *485low raw multistate score and a high raw essay score. Accordingly, the method of scoring the examination did not violate the requirement of SCR 65.

Petition denied.

1

 SCR 65(1) provides:

> “All applicants for examination for licenses to practice as attorneys and-counselors at law in this state shall be examined annually by the board of bar examiners by administering to all applicants a written bar examination consisting of two parts. One part shall be the Multistate Bar Examination prepared by the National Conference of Bar Examiners and the other part shall be a one-day essay examination. Each part shall be given on successive days. The same subjects may be covered on both parts. Each part shall be entitled to equal weight in the grading of the examination.”
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 210 (Tuesday, November 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 65918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21660]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center For Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the 
Developmental Therapeutics Study Section, October 27, 2005, 8 a.m. to 5 
p.m., October 28, 2005, Pooks Hill Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill 
Road, Bethesda, MD 20814, which was published in the Federal Register 
on October 7, 2005, 70 FR 58725-58728.
    The meeting will be held at the Bethesda North Marriott Hotel and 
Conference Center, 5701 Marinelli Road, North Bethesda, MD 20852. The 
meeting dates and time remain the same. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: October 20, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-21660 Filed 10-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to

revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

- 1

- 

### S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee, UNPUBLISHED

September 3, 2020

v No. 330612

Oakland Circuit Court

ALEX JAY ADAMOWICZ, LC No. 2014

- 251162

- FC

Defendant

- Appellant.

Before: S TEPHENS

, P .J., and K. F. K ELLY and M URRAY , JJ.

S TEPHENS

, P. J

. ( concurring ).

I concur in the result only.

/s/ Cynthia Diane Stephens
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                             LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<S>                                          <C>
DOMESTIC

Brooktree Corporation                        Conexant Systems Worldwide, Inc.
Incorporated in the state of California      Incorporated in the state of Delaware

Brooktree Worldwide Sales Corporation        DeviceGuys, Inc.
Incorporated in the state of California      Incorporated in the state of Washington

Conexant Systems, Inc.
Incorporated in the state of Neveda


FOREIGN

Brooktree International Ltd.                 Conexant Systems Israel Commercial Ltd.
Incorporated in the Cayman Islands           Incorporated in Israel

Brooktree Technologies Ltd.                  Conexant Systems Japan Company Ltd.
Incorporated in the Cayman Islands           Incorporated in Japan

Conexant Systems Asia Pacific Ltd.           Conexant Systems Korea Ltd.
Incorporated in Hong Kong, People's          Incorporated in Korea
Republic of China

Conexant Foreign Sales Corporation           Conexant Systems S.A. de C.V.
Incorporated in Barbados                     Incorporated in Mexico

Conexant Systems France S.A.S.               Conexant Systems Scandinavia AB
Incorporated in France                       Incorporated in Sweden

Conexant Systems Germany G.m.b.H.            Conexant Systems Singapore Pte. Limited
Incorporated in Germany                      Incorporated in Singapore

Conexant Systems Holdings Limited.           Conexant Systems Taiwan Co., Ltd.
Incorporated in the United Kingdom           Incorporated in Taiwan

Conexant Systems Iceland Ehf. (Ltd.)         Conexant Systems UK Limited.
Incorporated in Iceland                      Incorporated in the United Kingdom

Conexant Systems Israel (1996) Ltd.
Incorporated in Israel
</TABLE>
#### STATE v. JOHNSON

No. 47 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 376.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 November 1976.