alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5266 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5266

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2010

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To extend the final report deadline and otherwise reauthorize the 
             National Commission on Children and Disasters.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Commission on Children and 
Disasters Reauthorization Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL COMMISSION ON CHILDREN AND DISASTERS REAUTHORIZATION.

    (a) Deadline for Filling Vacancies.--Paragraph (2) of section 
605(g) of the Kids in Disasters Well-being, Safety, and Health Act of 
2007 (title VI of division G of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 
2008 (Public Law 110-161; 121 Stat. 1844, 2213)) is amended by 
inserting ``not later than 90 days after the date of vacancy'' after 
``shall be filled''.
    (b) Frequency of Interim Reports.--Subsection (a) of section 611 of 
the Kids in Disasters Well-being, Safety, and Health Act of 2007 is 
amended--
            (1) in the subsection heading, by striking ``Interim 
        Report'' and inserting ``Interim Reports''; and
            (2) by inserting ``and annually thereafter'' after ``first 
        meeting''.
    (c) Deadline for Final Report.--Subsection (c) of section 611 of 
the Kids in Disasters Well-being, Safety, and Health Act of 2007 is 
amended by striking ``not later than 2 years after the date of its 
first meeting'' and inserting ``not later than December 31, 2012''.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 612 of such Act is 
amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 612. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``(a) In General.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this title $1,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2012, 
and $1,000,000 for fiscal year 2013.
    ``(b) Availability.--Amounts made available pursuant to subsection 
(a) shall remain available until expended.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 20, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of River Rock Entertainment Authority (the “Authority”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas Searle, Chief Executive Officer of the Authority, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                              |
|   | (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Authority. |

By:_/s/ Douglas Searle  Douglas SearleChief Executive OfficerAugust 16, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the River Rock Entertainment Authority and will be retained by the River Rock Entertainment Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Exhibit 21

Iris International, Inc.

List of Subsidiaries



|                                       |  |                |  |                                             
|-------------------------------------- |  | -------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Susidiary                              |  | Jurisdiction   |  | % Owned                                     
|StatSpin, Inc.                         |  | Massachusetts  |  | 100%                                        
|Iris Global Network, Inc.              |  | Delaware       |  | 100%                                        
|Poly U/A Systems, Inc.                 |  | Delaware       |  | 100%                                        
|Advanced Degital Imaging Research, LLC |  | Texas          |  | 100% owned by Stat Spin, Inc.               
|Iris Diagnostics France S.A.           |  | France         |  | 100% owned by Iris Global Network, Inc.     
|Iris Deutschland GmbH                  |  | Germany        |  | 100% owned by Iris Global Network, Inc.     
|Iris Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.       |  | Delaware       |  | 100%                                        
|Iris International Europe GmbH         |  | Switzerland    |  | 100% owned by Iris Global Network, Inc.     
|Iris International Deutschland         |  | Germany        |  | 100% owned by Iris International Europe GmbH
|Iris Diagnostics (UK) Ltd.             |  | United Kingdom |  | 100% owned by Iris International Europe GmbH
[No. 24144.

Department One.

November 30, 1932.]

#### Surety Finance Company of Aberdeen, *Appellant,*v. Theodore Prinz *et al., Respondents.*
      *1*

*John C.*Graham, for appellant.

*Clyde W. Linville, Jr.,*for respondents.

Reported in 16 P. (2d) 613.

Per Curiam.

— This action was instituted by a payee to recover a balance claimed to be due on a promissory note. The trial of the cause to the court' resulted in findings and judgment in favor of the defendants on their cross-complaint. The judgment was rendered February *4,*1932. On March 8, 1932, written notice of appeal from that judgment and a copy of super-sedeas and appeal bond were served by plaintiff on counsel for defendants. The notice of appeal and the bond were filed in the office of the clerk of the superior court on March 18, 1932.

The appeal bond was not filed in the office of the clerk of the superior court within the statutory period after notice of appeal to this court was served, therefore the appeal is ineffectual for any purpose, under the statute which provides that

> *380“An appeal in a civil action or proceeding shall become ineffectual for any purpose unless at or before the time when the notice of appeal is given or served, or within five days thereafter, an appeal bond . . . be filed with the clerk of the superior court, . . .”. Rem. Comp. Stat., § 1721.

The service of a copy of the bond on defendants’ counsel at the same time that the notice of appeal was served was not a compliance with the statutory requirement that the bond “be filed with the clerk of the superior court” at or before the time the notice of appeal'is served, or within five days thereafter.

Th.e appeal is dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5278 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5278

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 10, 2010

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 405 West Second Street in Dixon, Illinois, as the ``President Ronald 
                   W. Reagan Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRESIDENT RONALD W. REAGAN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 405 West Second Street in Dixon, Illinois, shall be known 
and designated as the ``President Ronald W. Reagan Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``President 
Ronald W. Reagan Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 9, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. NIGEL GR

AHAM ER

NST, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 15-30290

D.C . No. 9:05-c r-00053-DW M M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of M o nta

na Dona ld W . M olloy , Distric t Judge , Pre s iding Subm itte d

June 14, 2016 ** B e fore : B EA, WATFORD, a nd FRIEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s. Nige l Gra ham Ernst a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the a ggre gate 6-m onth se nte nc e s im p ose d upon re voc ation of supe rvise d re le a se . W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED JUN 21 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Ernst c onte nds tha t his se nte nc e is substa

ntive ly unre a sona

ble be c a use the distric t c o urt pla c e d undue e m pha sis on unc ha

rge d c onduc t to thee xc l usion of m itiga ting fa c tors. Thedistric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re t ion. Se eGall v
. Unite d State s , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The se nte n c e is substa ntive ly re a s ona ble in light of the

18 U.S.C . § 3583(e ) fa c tors a nd the tota lity

of the c i rc um sta

nc e s, inc l uding Ernst’ s bre a c h of the c ourt’ s trust within two m onths of be ing pla c e d on supe rvise d re le a se . Se eUnite d State s v . Simtob , 485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th C ir. 2007); s e ealso Unite d State s v . Xinidak

is , 598 F.3d 1213, 1217 (9th C ir. 2010) (“ A distric t c o urt ha s disc re tion to im pose c onc urre nt or c o nse c utive se nte n c e s a fte r re voc ation of m

u l tiple c o n c urre nt te rm s of supe rvise d re le a s e .” ). AFFIRM E D.

1 5 - 3 0 2 9 0 2
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

M.H., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, CAYEY POST 

OFFICE, Cayey, PR, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-1337

Issued: March 18, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Thomas S. Harkins, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On September 6, 2021 counsel filed an appeal from a decision of the Office of Workers’

Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Office of the Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned 

Docket No. 21-1337 to this appeal.1

The Board has duly considered the matter and recognizes that the current appeal was not 

filed by appellant or his authorized representative. Section 501.3(a) of the Board’s Rules of 

Procedure provides that a “person adversely affected by a final decision of the Director [of OWCP] 

or his or her authorized Representative, may file an appeal of such decision by the Board .”

2

 The 

Board concludes that neither a “person adversely affected” by a final OWCP decision, nor an 

“authorized Representative,” has filed an appeal to the Board. As such, there is no valid appeal 

before the Board and Docket No. 21-1337 must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

1By letter dated October 8, 2021 counsel advised the Board that he did not represent appellant and had inadvertently 

filed the current appeal.

2

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(a).

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” 20 

C.F.R. § 501.6(d).
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-1337 is dismissed.

Issued: March 18, 2022

Washington, DC

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 211 (Wednesday, November 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 66488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21775]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Veterans' Disability Benefits Commission; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Pub. L. 
92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Veterans' Disability 
Benefits Commission has scheduled a meeting for Thursday, November 17, 
2005, and Friday, November 18, 2005, in hearing room 340, House 
Committee on Veterans' Affairs, Cannon House Office Building, 
Washington, DC. The meeting will begin each day at 9 a.m. and end at 4 
p.m. The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Commission is to carry out a study of the 
benefits under the laws of the United States that are provided to 
compensate and assist veterans and their survivors for disabilities and 
deaths attributable to military service.
    The agenda for the meeting will include a review of the Statement 
of Work for contracting with the Center for Naval Analyses for 
Commission approval and a discussion of potential field hearings to be 
conducted by Commission members during calendar year 2006.
    Interested persons may attend and present oral statements to the 
Commission. Time for oral presentations will be limited to five minutes 
or less, depending on the number of participants. Interested parties 
may provide written comments for review by the Commission prior to the 
meeting, by e-mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98eefdecfdeaf9f6ebd8eefdecebfbf7f5f5f1ebf1f7f6b6f1f6eceaf9f6fdecebb6fbf7f5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6e180b1a0b1c0f001d2e180b1a1d0d010303071d0701004007001a1c0f000b1a1d400d0103">[email protected]</span></a> or by mail 
to: Mr. Ray Wilburn, Executive Director, Veterans' Disability Benefits 
Commission, 1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 
20004.

    Dated: October 25, 2005.

    By direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-21775 Filed 11-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

S.B., Appellant

and

U.S. GOVERMENT, Employer

_________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0391

Issued: February 24, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On January 26, 2021 the Clerk of the Appellate Boards inadvertently assigned Docket No. 

21-0391 to a purported appeal from a decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs

(OWCP).

The Board has duly considered the matter and recognizes that this appeal was docketed 

under an incorrect OWCP file number. Section 501.3(a) of the Board’s Rules of Procedure

provides that a “person adversely affected by a final decision of the Director [of OWCP] or his or 

her authorized Representative, may file an appeal of such decision to the Board.”

1

 The Board 

concludes that neither a “person adversely affected” by a final OWCP decision, nor an “authorized 

Representative,” has filed an appeal to the Board. As such, there is no valid appeal before the 

Board and Docket No. 21-0391 must be dismissed. Accordingly,

1

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(a).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0391 is dismissed.

Issued: February 24, 2022

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

** SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of River Rock Entertainment Authority (the “Authority”) onForm 10-Q/A Amendment No.1 for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),each of the undersigned officers does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tosuch officers knowledge:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Authority.
| By:    |   | /s/ SHAWN S. SMYTH                                            |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Shawn S. Smyth                                                |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer                                       |
|   |   |                                                          |
|   |   |                                                          |
|   |   | April 17, 2007                                                |
|   |   |                                                          |
| By:    |   | /s/ JACOB A. COUGHLIN                                         |   |
|   |   | Jacob A. Coughlin                                             |
|   |   | Assistant Financial Controller (Principal Financial  Officer) |
|   |   | April 17, 2007                                                |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the RiverRock Entertainment Authority and will be retained by the River RockEntertainment Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
|  |
|--|

 

----
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Saed Mohseni, certifythat:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of McCormick & Schmick’s SeafoodRestaurants, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             [Reserved.]

 

c)              Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

 

d)             Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

a)              All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting  whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

 
| Date: November 5, 2004 | By:    | /s/ SAED MOHSENI        |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                   |   | Saed Mohseni            |
|                   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----