alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 212 (Thursday, November 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66820-66821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21921]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, 
the following proposal for collection of information under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by December 
5, 2005.
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: Application and Contract for 
Establishment of a Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps Unit; DA 
Form 3126; OMB Control Number 0702-0021.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 70.

[[Page 66821]]

    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 70.
    Average Burden Per Response: 1 hour.
    Annual Burden Hours: 70.
    Needs and Uses: Educational institutions which desire to host a 
Junior ROTC unit may make application using DA Form 3126. The program 
provides unique educational opportunities for young citizens through 
their participation in a Federally-sponsored course while pursuing a 
civilian education. Participating students develop citizenship, 
leadership and communication skills, knowledge of the role of the U.S. 
Army in support of national objectives, as well as an appreciation for 
the importance of physical fitness. The organization of units 
established by the Department of the Army at public and private 
secondary schools is provided under 10 U.S.C. 2031 and 32 CFR 542.
    Affected Public: Not-for-profit institutions.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Lewis Oleinick.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Oleinick at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    Dated: October 26, 2005.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 05-21921 Filed 11-02-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 12
                         JOSTENS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
          COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       Three months ended                                      Years ended
                                      ---------------------   --------------------------------------------------------------
                                      March 30,   March 31,   December 29,  December 30,  January 1,  January 2,  January 3,
Dollars in thousands                    2002        2001          2001          2000         2000        1999        1998
-----------------------------------------------------------   --------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                   <C>         <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>         <C>         <C>
Earnings
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes        $(11,085)   $(17,259)     $ 26,540      $(10,468)    $43,999     $35,952     $52,379

Interest expense
(excluding capitalized interest)        18,137      21,688        79,035        60,252       7,486       7,026       6,866

Portion of rent expense under
long-term operating leases
representative of an interest factor       365         339         1,164         1,121       1,483       1,233       2,133

-----------------------------------------------------------   -------------------------------------------------------------
Total earnings                        $  7,417    $  4,768      $106,739      $ 50,905     $52,968     $44,211     $61,378
===========================================================   =============================================================

Fixed charges
Interest expense
(including capitalized interest)      $ 18,137    $ 21,688      $ 79,035      $ 60,252     $ 7,887     $ 7,729     $ 6,866

Portion of rent expense under
long-term operating leases
representative of an interest factor       365         339         1,164         1,121       1,483       1,233       2,133

-----------------------------------------------------------   -------------------------------------------------------------
Total fixed charges                   $ 18,502    $ 22,027      $ 80,199      $ 61,373     $ 9,370     $ 8,962     $ 8,999
===========================================================   =============================================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges         0.4         0.2           1.3           0.8         5.7         4.9         6.8
</TABLE>
[Cite as State ex rel. Pryor v. Werren, 2017-Ohio-7668.]

COURT OF APPEALS 

STARK COUNTY, OHIO 

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. 

NC LaFONSE PRYOR 

 Relator 

-vsJUDGE CURT WERREN, CANTON 

MUNICIPAL COURT, et al. 

 Respondents 

JUDGES: 

Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P. J. 

Hon. John W. Wise, J. 

Hon. Earle E. Wise, J. 

Case No. 2017 CA 00029 

O P I N I O N 

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Writ of Quo Warranto 

JUDGMENT: Dismissed 

DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: September 18, 2017 

APPEARANCES: 

For Relator For Respondents 

NC LaFONSE PRYOR JOHN D. FERRERO 

PRO SE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 

STARK COUNTY JAIL RONALD MARK CALDWELL 

4500 Atlantic Boulevard, NE ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR 

Canton, Ohio 44705 110 Central Plaza South, Suite 510 

 Canton, Ohio 44702 

 
Stark County, Case No. 2017 CA 00029 2

Wise, John, J. 

{¶1} Petitioner, NC LaFonse Pryor, has filed a Petition for Writ of Quo Warranto 

against Respondents Judges Curt Werren and Taryn L. Heath. Respondents have filed 

a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 

{¶2} Petitioner generally argues Respondents lack jurisdiction over his case due 

to an excessive bond and violation of various constitutional rights. 

{¶3} For a writ of quo warranto to issue, “a relator must establish (1) that the 

office is being unlawfully held and exercised by respondent, and (2) that relator is entitled 

to the office.” State ex rel. Paluf v. Feneli (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 138, 141, 630 N.E.2d 

708. 

{¶4} The Ohio Supreme Court has held, “‘[A]n action in quo warranto may be 

brought by an individual as a private citizen only when he personally is claiming title to a 

public office.’ ” State ex rel. Coyne v. Todia (1989), 45 Ohio St.3d 232, 238, 543 N.E.2d 

1271, quoting State ex rel. Annable v. Stokes (1970), 24 Ohio St.2d 32, 32-33, 53 O.O.2d 

18, 262 N.E.2d 863. 

{¶5} “[D]ismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can 

be granted is appropriate if the complaint is frivolous or the claimant obviously cannot 

prevail on the facts alleged in the complaint. State ex rel. Bruggeman v. Ingraham (1999), 

87 Ohio St.3d 230, 231, 718 N.E.2d 1285, 1287.” State ex rel. Kreps v. Christiansen

(2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 313, 316, 725 N.E.2d 663, 667. 

 
Stark County, Case No. 2017 CA 00029 3

{¶6} Petitioner does not aver in his Petition that he is entitled to the offices held 

by Respondents. For this reason, we find the petition lacks merit and dismiss the petition 

for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 

By: Wise, John, J. 

Gwin, P. J., and 

Wise, Earle, Jr., J., concur. 

JWW/d 0830
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 211 (Wednesday, November 2, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66330-66331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21554]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 05-2694; MM Docket No. 01-188, RM-10203]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Evant, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Audio Division, at the request of Charles Crawford, the 
proponent of a petition for rule making to allot Channel 243A at Evant, 
Texas, 66 FR 44588 (August 24, 2001), dismisses the petition for rule 
making and terminates the proceeding.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Dupont, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 01-188, adopted October 12, 2005, and 
released October 14, 2005. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-
257, Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision also

[[Page 66331]]

may be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best 
Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, 
Washington, DC 20554, (800) 378-3160, or via the company's Web site, 
http://www.bcpiweb.com. The Report and Order is not subject to the 
Congressional Review Act, and therefore the Commission will not send a 
copy of it in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government 
Accountability Office, see U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 05-21554 Filed 11-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
# C_2007100EN.01000101.xml

| 4.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4614 — ED&F MAN/Bromacom)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 100/01)

On 25 April 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4614. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4614. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ares Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), R. Kipp deVeer, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Penni F. Roll, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

 

1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:   August 4, 2015     |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |   |
| /s/   R. Kipp deVeer            |   |
| R.   Kipp deVeer                |   |
| Chief   Executive Officer       |   |
| (Principal   Executive Officer) |   |
|                            |   |
| Date:   August 4, 2015     |   |
|                            |   |
| /s/   Penni F. Roll             |   |
| Penni   F. Roll                 |   |
| Chief   Financial Officer       |   |
| (Principal   Financial Officer) |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ares Capital Corporation and will be retained by Ares Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellant

v.

RONALD LEWIS WEBB JR.,

Appellee

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 75 MAP 2018

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellant

v.

RONALD LEWIS WEBB JR.,

Appellee

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 76 MAP 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of September, 2020, the Joint Application to Remand is 

GRANTED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming 

County for further proceedings.
# C_2007133EN.01000101.xml

| 15.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4561 — GE/Smiths Aerospace)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 133/01)

On 23 April 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4561. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4561. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
Exhibit 11.1      Computation of Per Share Earnings

                                          1996          1995          1994
                                          ----          ----          ----

Net Earnings                           $7,561,000    $6,854,000    $5,258,000

Less: Preferred Dividends                       0             0      (31,000)

Adjusted Net Earnings                   7,561,000    $6,854,000    $5,227,000

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding*
    Primary                             4,711,789     4,641,113     4,558,725
    Fully Diluted                       4,719,506     4,652,483     4,561,528

Net Income per Common Share*
    Primary                            $     1.60    $     1.48    $     1.15
    Fully Diluted                      $     1.60    $     1.47    $     1.15


* Adjusted to reflect the two-for-one common stock split effective July 1, 1994,
the 10% stock dividend effective May 3, 1995 and the 50% stock dividend
effective July 1, 1996.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 29, 2021

NO. 03

- 19

- 00773

- CV

Valerie Gray and 1720 W. Anderson Lane, L.L.C. , Appellant s

v.

Catherine Galvan , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 419TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUN TY

BE FORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, KELLY, AND SMITH

REVERSED AND RENDERED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART

--

OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed b y the tr i a l court on September 9, 2019 . Hav ing

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in

the court’s judgment

. T he Court reverses the trial court’s judgment and renders a take n othing

judgment ag ai nst G alvan . We remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings to

determine the attorney ’ s f ee s and court costs

. The appell ee shall pay all costs relating to this

appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

D.B., Appellant

and

U.S. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, 

Chicago, IL, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 22-0304

Issued: June 29, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On December 20, 2021 appellant filed a timely appeal from a November 29, 2021 merit 

decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the 

Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 22-0304.

In a letter dated June 11, 2022 and received June 15, 2022, appellant requested that the 

appeal be withdrawn to enable her to purse reconsideration before OWCP.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that appellant’s request for the 

withdrawal of the appeal should be granted. Accordingly, 
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the withdrawal of the appeal

is granted. The appeal docketed as No. 22-0304 is dismissed.

Issued: June 29, 2022

Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Presidential Documents

62225 

Federal Register 

Vol. 70, No. 208 

Friday, October 28, 2005 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2006–01 of October 14, 2005 

Waiver and Certification of Statutory Provisions Regarding 

the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Office 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

Pursuant to the authority and conditions contained in section 534(d) of 

the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2005, Public Law 108–447, as provided for in the Joint Resolution 

Making Continuing Appropriations for the Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 

109–77), I hereby determine and certify that it is important to the national 

security interests of the United States to waive the provisions of section 

1003 of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1987, Public Law 100–204. 

This waiver shall be effective for a period of 6 months from the date 

hereof. You are hereby authorized and directed to transmit this determination 

to the Congress and to publish it in the 

W 

Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, October 14, 2005. 

[FR Doc. 05–21614 

Filed 10–27–05; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7051

RICKY DEAN NORMAN,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Statesville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (5:20-cv-00021-MR)

Submitted: December 17, 2020 Decided: December 22, 2020

Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky Dean Norman, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Dean Norman seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. See Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 148 & n.9 (2012) 

(explaining that § 2254 petitions are subject to one-year statute of limitations, running from 

latest of four commencement dates enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)). The order is 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here,

the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both 

that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez, 565 U.S. at 140-41 (citing Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th 

Cir. R. 34(b). Because Norman’s informal brief does not challenge the dispositive 

timeliness determination by the district court, he has forfeited appellate review. See

Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important 

document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that 

brief.”). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0494

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DAVID ALAN SPAGNOLO,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 1, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 26 2021

03/26/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0494
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration StatementNos. 2-64879, 2-80037, 33-18081, 33-23793, 33-41485, 33-43459, 33-45479,33-55825, 33-58851, 33-64345, 333-8141, 333-38131, and 333-52056 of Sears,Roebuck and Co.; Registration Statement Nos. 33-58139, 33-64215, 33-9817,333-30879, and 333-62847 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears Roebuck AcceptanceCorp.; Registration Statement Nos. 33-64775, 333-18591, and 333-43309 ofSears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears, Roebuck and Co. Deferred CompensationPlan; Registration Statement Nos. 33-57205, 333-11973, 333-53149, 333-92501,and 333-56272 of Sears Roebuck and Co. and the Sears 401(k) Savings Plan(formerly, The Savings and Profit Sharing Fund of Sears Employees and the401(k) Profit Sharing Plan); and Registration Statement No. 33-44671 ofSears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears DC Corp.; of our report dated February12, 2001, incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofSears, Roebuck and Co. for the year ended December 30, 2000.  
/S/Deloitte & Touche LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 20, 2001