alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5200 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to extend eligibility for coverage 

under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program with respect 

to certain adult dependents of Federal employees and annuitants, in 

conformance with amendments made by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 4, 2010 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN (for himself, Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia, Ms. NORTON, and 

Mrs. DAHLKEMPER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to extend eligibility 

for coverage under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program with respect to certain adult dependents 

of Federal employees and annuitants, in conformance 

with amendments made by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FEHBP Dependent 

5 Coverage Extension Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5200 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF DEPENDENT COVERAGE UNDER 

2 FEHBP. 

3 (a) PROVISIONS RELATING TO AGE.—Chapter 89 of 

4 title 5, United States Code, is amended— 

5 (1) in section 8901(5)— 

6 (A) in the matter before subparagraph (A), 

7 by striking ‘‘22 years of age’’ and inserting ‘‘26 

8 years of age’’; and 

9 (B) in the matter after subparagraph (B), 

10 by striking ‘‘age 22’’ and inserting ‘‘age 26’’; 

11 and 

12 (2) in section 8905(c)(2)(B)— 

13 (A) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘22 years of 

14 age’’ and inserting ‘‘26 years of age’’; and 

15 (B) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘age 22’’ and 

16 inserting ‘‘age 26’’. 

17 (b) PROVISIONS RELATING TO MARITAL STATUS.— 

18 Chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, is further 

19 amended— 

20 (1) in section 8901(5) and subsections 

21 (b)(2)(A), (c)(2)(B), (e)(1)(B), and (e)(2)(A) of sec22 tion 8905a, by striking ‘‘an unmarried dependent’’ 

23 each place it appears and inserting ‘‘a dependent’’; 

24 and 

25 (2) in section 8905(c)(2)(B), by striking ‘‘un26 married dependent’’ and inserting ‘‘dependent’’. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5200 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall become effective as if included in the en3 actment of section 1001 of the Patient Protection and Af4 fordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148), except that the 

5 Director of the Office of Personnel Management may im6 plement such amendments for such periods before the ef7 fective date otherwise provided in section 1004(a) of such 

8 Act as the Director may specify. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit32**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

** 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

** AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

** SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of River RockEntertainment Authority (the “Authority”) on Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 1 forthe quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officersdoes hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officers knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Authority.
|  By:               | /s/ Shawn S.  Smyth |   |
|-------------------------|---------------------|--------|
| Shawn S. Smyth          |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| April 17, 2007          |

 
| By:                                                           | /s/ Jacob A.  Coughlin |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
| Jacob A. Coughlin                                             |
| Assistant Financial Controller (Principal Financial  Officer) |
| April 17, 2007                                                |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the River RockEntertainment Authority and will be retained by the River Rock EntertainmentAuthority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

----
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5459 

To increase the limits on liability under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands 

Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 28, 2010 

Mrs. CAPPS (for herself and Mr. WEINER) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To increase the limits on liability under the Outer 

Continental Shelf Lands Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Outer Continental 

5 Shelf Lands Act Amendments Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REMEDIES AND PENALTIES UNDER THE OUTER 

7 CONTINENTAL SHELF LANDS ACT. 

8 (a) CIVIL PENALTIES.—Section 24(b) of the Outer 

9 Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1350(b)) is 

10 amended— 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5459 IH

1 (1) in the first sentence of paragraph (1), by 

2 striking ‘‘$20,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$75,000’’; and 

3 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘may be as4 sessed’’ and inserting ‘‘of not more than $150,000 

5 for each day of the continuance of the failure shall 

6 be assessed’’. 

7 (b) CRIMINAL PENALTIES.—The first sentence of 

8 section 24(c) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

9 (43 U.S.C. 1350(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘$100,000’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘$10,000,000’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 subsection (a) take effect on April 15, 2010. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6152
JOHN NASTARI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-924-BO-5) Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 26, 1999Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Nastari, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John Nastari appeals the district court’s order denying reliefon his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Nastari v.United States , No. CA-98-924-BO-5 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 11, 1999). We deny Nastari’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RANDY L. ROUNDTREE, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2368

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed April 10, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pasco County; Susan G. Barthle, Judge. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5315 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the period of time in 

which a member of the Armed Forces may transfer educational assistance 

under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program to a dependent 

child. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 13, 2010 

Mr. WELCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the period 

of time in which a member of the Armed Forces may 

transfer educational assistance under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program to a dependent child. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Post-9/11 GI Bill Im5 provement Act’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5315 IH

1 SEC. 2. TIME PERIOD FOR TRANSFER OF EDUCATIONAL AS2 SISTANCE UNDER THE POST-9/11 EDU3 CATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (5) of section 3319(h) 

5 of title 38, United States Code, is amended to read as 

6 follows: 

7 ‘‘(5) LIMITATION ON AGE OF TRANSFER AND

8 USE BY CHILDREN.—Educational assistance trans9 ferred under this section to a child— 

10 ‘‘(A) may be transferred at any time before 

11 the child attains the age of 26 years; and 

12 ‘‘(B) may be used without regard to the 

13 15-year delimiting date, but may not be used 

14 after the child attains the age of 26 years.’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 this section shall take effect on the date that is 90 days 

17 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6152

JOHN NASTARI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-924-BO-5)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 26, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Nastari, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

John Nastari appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Nastari v.United States, No. CA-98-924-BO-5 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 11,

1999). We deny Nastari’s motion for appointment of counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         5,059
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  42,656
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,393
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               60,091
<PP&E>                                         209,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                 123,590
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,478
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          46,433
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       170
<OTHER-SE>                                     (87,513)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,478
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               131,162
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  98,502
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               19,527
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               597
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             12,220
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                13,133
<INCOME-TAX>                                   863
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            12,270
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   12,270
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.39



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of River Rock Entertainment Authority (the “Authority”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas Searle, Chief Executive Officer of the Authority, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result      of operations of the Authority. 

By: /s/ Douglas Searle Douglas Searle Chief Executive Officer November 15, 2004 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the River Rock Entertainment Authority and will be retained by the River Rock Entertainment Authority and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eduardo REYES-VALDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-50533.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided April 20, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Eduardo Reyes-Valdez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United, States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Otelco Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael D. Weaver,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to my knowledge:




1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15
                (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







/s/
      Michael D. Weaver





Michael
      D. Weaver


Chief
      Executive Officer


November
      7, 2007
#### STATE INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE SYSTEM, Appellant, v. KELLEEN PORTER (FERGUSON) and WAYNE NEWTON’S ARAMUS ARABIANS, Respondents.

No. 16923

March 31, 1987

734 P.2d 729

*171
      *Roben G. Giunta,*Assoc. General Counsel, *Darla R. Anderson,*General Counsel, Las Vegas; *Pamela Bugge,*General Counsel, Carson City, for Appellant.

*King, Clark, Gross & Sutclijf,*Las Vegas; *Gordon C. Richards,*Las Vegas; *James M. Nave,*Appeals Officer, Las Vegas, for Respondents.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

The respondent Porter was employed by Wayne Newton’s Aramus Arabians. During the course of Porter’s employment, a horse kicked her and the trauma led to a two-month premature delivery of Porter’s child, Christopher. Both mother and child incurred medical expenses directly attributable to the industrial accident. In ensuing proceedings pursuant to Nevada’s Worker’s Compensation Statutes, an appeals officer ordered the SIIS to pay the short-term neonatal medical expenses resulting from the accident. The district court affirmed; this appeal followed. We agree with the district court.

We think it evident that where, as here, an industrial accident is found to have resulted in a premature birth, and there are medical expenses directly relating to the premature birth, the working mother is entitled to benefits for the short-term neonatal care of the child that are directly attributable to the premature nature of the birth.

Work places present hazards, and a pregnant woman is compelled by the laws of nature to expose her fetus to those hazards. If she is to benefit her employer, both she and her fetus must risk the dangers of the work place. We therefore conclude that the purposes of the Nevada Worker’s compensation scheme are in accord with the appeals officer’s determination.

We find it unnecessary to reach other questions that have been tendered by appellant. Porter has not attempted to claim that the appeals officer’s ruling established a right to recover for further care which may hereafter become necessary and which may arguably be related to the accident.

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, October 26, 2005, 2 p.m. to October 26, 2005, 3:30 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 7, 2005, 70 FR 58723-58725.                

The time of the meeting on October 26, 2005 has been changed to 11 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. The meeting date and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: October 20, 2005.

Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-21655 Filed 10-31-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

B.V., Appellant

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, ARMY 

NATIONAL GUARD, Morrisville, N.C., 

Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 22-0374

Issued: July 18, 2022

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Margaret Wilson, Representative, for the appellant

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On January 10, 2022 the Clerk of the Appellate Boards inadvertently assigned Docket 

No. 22-0374 to a purported appeal from a decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation 

Programs (OWCP). 

The Board, having duly considered the matter, notes that this appeal was filed by a health 

care provider in an effort to secure payment of medical expenses. Section 501.3(a) of the 

Board’s Rules of Procedure provides that only a “person adversely affected by a final decision of 

the Director [of OWCP] or his or her authorized Representative, may file an appeal of such 

decision by the Board.”

1

 Here, neither a “person adversely affected” by a final OWCP decision, 

nor an “authorized Representative,” has filed an appeal to the Board. As such, there is no valid 

appeal before the Board and Docket No. 22-0374 must be dismissed.2 Accordingly,

1

20 C.F.R. § 501.3(a)

2 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance. ” 20 

C.F.R. § 501.6(d).
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 22-0374 is dismissed.

Issued: July 18, 2022

Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
FORM 10-Q/A


                    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                          Washington, D.C. 20549


                         GREAT DANE HOLDINGS INC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


             Delaware                               54-0698116
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
   (State or other jurisdiction                  (I.R.S. Employer
 of incorporation or organization)              Identification No.)


2016 North Pitcher Street, Kalamazoo, Michigan                  49007
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
   (Address of principal executive offices)                  (Zip Code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code (616) 343-6121
                                                  -------------------------



                              Amendment No. 1

     The undersigned registrant hereby amends its Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 1996, in order to substitute the attached Exhibit 10.1
for Exhibit 10.1, as originally filed.



     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                      GREAT DANE HOLDINGS INC.
                                   ------------------------------
                                            (Registrant)



                                     /s/  Marlan R. Smith
                                   ------------------------------
                                   Marlan R. Smith, Treasurer
                                   (Principal Financial Officer and
                                   Principal Accounting Officer)

Dated:  December 5, 1996
<PAGE>