alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

          <ARTICLE>     5
          <MULTIPLIER>     1,000

          <S>                                <C>
          <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
          <PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1999
          <PERIOD-END>                                         JUN-30-1999
          <PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
          <CASH>                                                     6,538
          <SECURITIES>                                                   0
          <RECEIVABLES>                                            376,116
          <ALLOWANCES>                                              21,093
          <INVENTORY>                                              298,123
          <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         693,039
          <PP&E>                                                   524,696
          <DEPRECIATION>                                           228,719
          <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         1,314,519
          <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    173,981
          <BONDS>                                                  550,600
          <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
          <PREFERRED>                                                    0
          <COMMON>                                                  52,277
          <OTHER-SE>                                               121,816
          <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           1,314,519
          <SALES>                                                1,053,963
          <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       1,053,963
          <CGS>                                                    753,296
          <TOTAL-COSTS>                                            753,296
          <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
          <LOSS-PROVISION>                                           2,440
          <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        19,422
          <INCOME-PRETAX>                                           87,687
          <INCOME-TAX>                                              32,388
          <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       55,299
          <DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
          <EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
          <CHANGES>                                                      0
          <NET-INCOME>                                              55,299
          <EPS-BASIC>                                               1.07
          <EPS-DILUTED>                                               1.04


</TABLE>
Webb



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 21, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00275

- CV

Adriana P. PEREZ

, Appellant

v.

WEBB COUNTY

, Appellee

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CVT000305 D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting 1 : Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Webb County filed a motion for en banc reconsideration of the panel’s decision. A

majority of the en banc court having failed to vote in favor of the motion, the motion is denied

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 41.2, 49.7.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

1 J ustice Patricia O. Alvarez recuses herself from this proceeding.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I ha ve hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of July, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      NFC. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      March 9, 2010 |   | /s/    | DAVID J. JOHANNESON              |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                     |   |   | David      J. Johanneson         |
|                     |   |   | Principal      Executive Officer |

| Date:      March 9, 2010 |   | /s/    | WILLIAM V. MCMENAMIN             |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                     |   |   | William      V. McMenamin        |
|                     |   |   | Principal      Financial Officer |

| Date:      March 9, 2010 |   | /s/    | DAVID L. DERFELT                  |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|                     |   |   | David      L. Derfelt             |
|                     |   |   | Principal      Accounting Officer |

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO				 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350				 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO				 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of SoftNet Technology Corporation (the "Company"), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:A. the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and			B. the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.Dated: November 19, 2005

/s/ James Farinella                              			James Farinella			Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JOSTENS,
INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTH
PERIOD ENDED JULY 3, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                     8,405
<RECEIVABLES>                                  135,613
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,234)
<INVENTORY>                                     77,783
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               246,565
<PP&E>                                         268,654
<DEPRECIATION>                               (179,583)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 377,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          290,114
<BONDS>                                          3,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,350
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,675
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   377,437
<SALES>                                        469,519
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               469,519
<CGS>                                          209,243
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  209,243
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               178,636
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   886
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,498
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 79,142
<INCOME-TAX>                                    32,053
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             47,089
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,089
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.36


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5311 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5311

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
 treatment of municipal bonds guaranteed by Federal home loan banks as 
                           tax exempt bonds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 13, 2010

Mr. Pascrell (for himself, Mr. Boustany, and Mr. Kanjorski) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
 treatment of municipal bonds guaranteed by Federal home loan banks as 
                           tax exempt bonds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Development Financing Act 
of 2010''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF MUNICIPAL BONDS GUARANTEED BY FEDERAL HOME LOAN 
              BANKS AS TAX EXEMPT BONDS MADE PERMANENT.

    Clause (iv) of section 149(b)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``during the period beginning on the date 
of the enactment of this clause and ending on December 31, 2010'' and 
inserting ``on or after July 30, 2008''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31
 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves persons who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  Date: March 2, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Lee Ann AndersonLee Ann AndersonVice President and Senior Trust Officer,
Compass Bank
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Vincent Rossi, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of St. Bernard Software, Inc.;
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



By:

/s/ Vincent RossiVincent RossiChief Executive OfficerDated: May 15, 2007
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6686

GLENN R. GOODE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CRAGGY MEDICAL STAFF, at Craggy CorrectionalCenter; MARION MEDICAL STAFF, at Marion Correctional Institution; LEWIS DAVIS, Lieutenant at Craggy Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-41-1-3-MU) Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 15, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Glenn R. Goode, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Glenn Ralph Goode appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Goode v. Craggy Medical Staff , No. CA-98-41-1- 3-MU (W.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### CHARLES E. LEYDECKER v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. 45299.

Decided December 7, 1942]

*Mr. Fred- W. Shields*for the plaintiff. *Messrs. King & King*were on the brief.

*Mr. L. R.*Mehlinger, with whom was *Mr. Assistant Attorney General Francis M. Shea,*for the defendant.

*713The court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to recover in an opinion *fer curiam,*as follows:

The defendant does not deny plaintiff’s mother was solely dependent upon him for support. It is clear that she was. Accordingly, plaintiff is entitled to the additional allowance for a dependent, as provided for by law. See *Barnes*v. *United*States, 95 C. Cls. 411; *Ficklen*v. *United*States, 95 C. Cls. 531; *Van Auken*v. *United*States, No. 44646, decided by this court November 2, 1942.

Entry of judgment will be suspended until the incoming of a report from the General Accounting Office showing the amount due computed in accordance with the foregoing findings and this opinion. It is so ordered.

In accordance with the above opinion and upon a report from the General Accounting Office showing the amount due thereunder to be $1,119.53, and upon plaintiff’s motion for judgment, it was ordered April 5,1943, that judgment for the plaintiff be entered in the sum of $1,119.53.

Plaintiff’s motion to vacate the above judgment and to obtain further information from the General Accounting Office was overruled April 28,1943.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF WMS INDUSTRIES INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Subsidiary                                       Jurisdiction of Incorporation
----------                                       -----------------------------
<S>                                              <C>
WMS Games Inc.                                   Delaware
WMS Gaming Inc.                                  Delaware
WMS Gaming (Nevada) Inc.                         Nevada
WMS Gaming (Canada) Ltd.                         New Brunswick, Canada
Fun House Games Inc.                             Delaware
Lenc-Smith Inc.                                  Delaware
Williams Electronics Games, Inc.                 Delaware
WMS Finance Inc.                                 Delaware
WMS Gaming International, S.L.                   Spain
WMS Gaming Australia PTY Ltd.                    Australia
WMS Gaming Africa (Pty) Ltd.                     South Africa
WMS Gaming do Brasil, Ltda.                      Brazil
Big Foot Software Research &
Development, LLC                                 Nevada

</TABLE>
#### ANTHONY “TONY” BARKER, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 7518

December 27, 1974

529 P.2d 204

*461
      *George, Steffen & Simmons,*of Las Vegas, for Appellant.

*Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *Roy A Woof-ter,*District Attorney, and *Dan Seaton,*Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

In this appeal from an order denying a pretrial petition for habeas corpus, we believe the unchallenged evidence adduced at the preliminary examination justified the magistrate’s determination that there was probable cause to hold appellant for trial. NRS 171.206. See concurring opinion by Zenoff, J., in Franklin v. State, 89 Nev. 382, 389, 513 P.2d 1252, 1257 (1973). Cf. Callanan v. United States, 364 U.S. 587 (1961); McWilliams v. State, 87 Nev. 302, 486 P.2d 481 (1971).

“[W]e are not now concerned with the prospect that the evidence presently in the record may, by itself, be insufficient to sustain a conviction.” McDonald v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 326, 327, 512 P.2d 774, 775 (1973).

Other contentions raised by appellant have previously been considered and rejected. McGee v. Sheriff, 86 Nev. 421, 470 P.2d 132 (1970); cf. Johnson v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 304, 511 P.2d 1051 (1973); Goldsmith v. Sheriff, 85 Nev. 295, 454 P.2d 86 (1969).

The order denying habeas relief is affirmed.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                 Exhibit 11.2


                              EARNINGS PER SHARE
                          FULLY DILUTED COMPUTATION
              ($ in millions except share and per share amounts)


<CAPTION> 
                                              Six Months Ended
                                                December 31,
                                             1995           1994
--------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                          <C>            <C>
Basis for computation of earnings per 
  common and common equivalent shares:
    Earnings from continuing operations      $ 74.0         $ 65.8
    Deduct dividends on 4 Percent 
      cumulative preferred stock                (.2)           (.2)
                                             --------       --------
    Earnings from continuing operations
      available to common shareholders         73.8           65.6
    Discontinued operations                    22.5            7.9
                                             --------       --------
   Available for common shareholders         $ 96.3         $ 73.5
                                             ========       ========



Number of shares:
  Weighted average shares outstanding        76,098,488     76,757,943
  Shares issuable upon exercise of 
    stock options, net of shares assumed
    to be repurchased                         1,181,659        716,010
                                             ----------     ----------
                                             77,280,147     77,473,953
                                             ==========     ==========




Earnings per common share:
  Continuing operations                        $ .96          $.85
  Discontinued operations                        .29           .10
                                               -----         -----
  Net earnings                                 $1.25          $.95
                                               =====         =====


</TABLE>
# L_2008338EN.01007901.xml

| 17.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 338/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 338/79

---

Corrigendum to Commission Directive 2007/72/EC of 13 December 2007 amending Council Directive 66/401/EEC as regards the inclusion of the species Galega orientalis Lam.

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 329 of 14 December 2007
  )

On page 38, Annex, point 1(a), column 14:

for:

‘10 (e)’,

read:

‘10 (n)’;

on page 39, Annex, point 1(b), column 7:

for:

‘(e)’,

read:

‘0 (e)’.

---