alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             384
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,467
<ALLOWANCES>                                       320
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,582
<PP&E>                                          11,543
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,353
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           61,737
<PREFERRED>                                        458
<COMMON>                                           290
<OTHER-SE>                                    (61,882)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,791
<SALES>                                          3,611
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,597
<CGS>                                            1,905
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,905
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,518
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 607
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (433)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (433)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     93
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,693)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.71)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit  13.2**

CERTIFICATION  OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 USC. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, V.  Balakrishnan, certify, pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of  Infosys Technologies Limited on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2007 fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Annual  Report on Form 20-F fairly presents in all material respects the financial  condition and results of operations of Infosys Technologies Limited.

Date: May 2,  2007

/s/ V. BALAKRISHNAN **V. Balakrishnan***Chief  Financial Officer*
# C_2007249EN.01000601.xml

| 24.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/6

---

COUNCIL DECISION

COUNCIL DECISION

of 15 October 2007

appointing the Italian members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work

(2007/C 249/07)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 202 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision of 22 July 2003 on the setting up of an Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work (1), and in particular Article 3 thereof,

1

Having regard to the list of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States,

Whereas:

| (1) | In its Decision of 27 February 2007 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for the period from 1 March 2007 until 28 February 2010, except for the Italian members and alternate members. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In its Decision of 27 February 2007 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for the period from 1 March 2007 until 28 February 2010, except for the Italian members and alternate members.

2

| (2) | The Italian Government has proposed candidates for the vacant seats, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Italian Government has proposed candidates for the vacant seats,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following are hereby appointed members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for the period ending on 28 February 2010:

I.   GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES

| Members | Alternates |
| --- | --- |
| Ms Lea BATTISTONI | Mr Lorenzo FANTINI
  Mr Mario ALVINO |

Members

Alternates

Ms Lea BATTISTONI

Mr Lorenzo FANTINI

Mr Mario ALVINO

II.   TRADE UNION REPRESENTATIVES

| Members | Alternates |
| --- | --- |
| Mr Diego ALHAIQUE | Ms Cinzia FRASCHERI
  Ms Gabriella GALLI |

Members

Alternates

Mr Diego ALHAIQUE

Ms Cinzia FRASCHERI

Ms Gabriella GALLI

III.   EMPLOYERS' REPRESENTATIVES

| Members | Alternates |
| --- | --- |
| Mr Luigi CASANO | Mr Walter REGIS
  Mr Giorgio RUSSOMANNO |

Members

Alternates

Mr Luigi CASANO

Mr Walter REGIS

Mr Giorgio RUSSOMANNO

Done at Luxembourg, 15 October 2007.

For the Council

The President

L. AMADO

---

(1)  OJ C 218, 13.9.2003, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 64, 2.3.2007, p. 30.

2

---
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 31998D0351

**98/351/EC: Commission Decision of 29 May 1998 setting the date on which dispatch from Northern Ireland of bovine products under the Export Certified Herds Scheme may commence by virtue of Article 6(5) of Council Decision 98/256/EC (Text with EEA relevance)***Official Journal L 157 , 30/05/1998 P. 0110 - 0111*

COMMISSION DECISION of 29 May 1998 setting the date on which dispatch from Northern Ireland of bovine products under the Export Certified Herds Scheme may commence by virtue of Article 6(5) of Council Decision 98/256/EC (Text with EEA relevance) (98/351/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC (2),

Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (3), as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC,

Having regard to Council Decision 98/256/EC of 16 March 1998 concerning emergency measures to protect against bovine spongiform encephalopathy, amending Decision 94/474/EC and repealing Decision 96/239/EC (4) and in particular Article 6(5) thereof,

Whereas Article 6(5) of Decision 98/256/EC requires the Commission to set the date on which dispatch of products referred to in this Article may commence, after having carried out Community inspections and after having informed the Member States;

Whereas inspections carried out by the Commission services in Northern Ireland from 20 to 22 April 1998, in particular to assess the system of veterinary checks pursuant to Articles 6 and 7 of Decision 98/256/EC, have shown that the conditions are complied with satisfactorily;

Whereas at the time of adoption of Decision 98/256/EC, the Commission undertook to present, in accordance with its normal practice for inspection reports, to the Member States convened in the Veterinary Standing Committee, the results of the inspection referred to in Article 6(5) and the consequences it draws from them; whereas this presentation has taken place; whereas therefore, the date is set at 1 June 1998,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1 

The date referred to in Article 6(5) of Decision 98/256/EC shall be 1 June 1998.

Article 2 

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 May 1998.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 29.

(2) OJ L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 49.

(3) OJ L 395, 30. 12. 1989, p. 13.

(4) OJ L 113, 15. 4. 1998, p. 32.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 41172

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

FRANCISCO PEREZ OROZCO ,
Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 451

Filed: April 15, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, Canyon County. Hon. Thomas J. Ryan , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty

- five years, with a minimum period of confinement of fifteen years , for sexual battery of a minor child sixteen or seventeen years of age, with enhancement

, affirmed

.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Jessica M. Lorello , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and GRATTON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Francisco Perez Orozco was found guilty of sexual battery of a minor child sixteen or
seventeen years of age, with enhancement . Idaho Code § § 18

- 1508A, 19

- 2520G(2) . The district

court sentenced Orozco to a unified term of twenty

- five years, with a minimum peri od of
confinement of fifteen years

. Orozco appeals asserting that the district court abused its

di scretion by imposing an excessive sentence

. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeate d here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-2 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When revi ewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abuse d its discretion.
Therefore, Orozco ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DORETHA THOMPSON

No. 7316SC221

(Filed 14 March 1973)

Criminal Law § 143; Intoxicating Liquor § 5— illegal possession of whiskey — illegal possession of beer for sale — revocation of probation — no error

There was no prejudicial error in defendant’s trial for illegal possession of whiskey and illegal possession of beer for the purpose of sale, nor was there error in a subsequent hearing in which defendant’s probation was revoked and a prison sentence imposed.

Appeals by defendant from judgments of *McKinnon, Judge,*entered at the 28 August 1972 and 16 October 1972 Sessions of Robeson Superior Court.

By warrant proper in form defendant was charged with (1) illegal possession of whiskey and (2) illegal possession of beer for purpose of sale. The offenses were allegedly committed on 12 May 1972. Defendant was found guilty in district court and from judgment imposed there, she appealed to superior court where she pleaded not guilty. Following the introduction of evidence by the State in superior court, defendant expressed her desire to change her plea to guilty. After due inquiry to determine if the guilty plea was freely, understandingly and voluntarily made, the court adjudged that it was, accepted the plea and entered judgment that defendant serve 12 months in prison. Defendant gave notice of appeal from said judgment which was entered on 7 September 1972.

On 22 September 1972, following a hearing, the District Court of Robeson County determined that defendant had wilfully violated the terms of a probation judgment entered on 24 January 1972; the court revoked defendant’s probation and ordered the activation of a 12 months prison sentence. From the order revoking her probation, defendant appealed to superior court.

On 26 October 1972, following a hearing, Judge McKinnon entered judgment confirming the district court order revoking defendant’s probation and ordered the prison sentence activated immediately. Defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals.

*590
      *Attorney General Robert Morgan by Richard B. Conely for the State.*

*Musselwhite & Musselwhite by William E. Musselwhite for defendant appellant.*

BRITT, Judge.

A careful review of the record reveals no prejudicial error. The judgments appealed from are

Affirmed.

Judges Morris and Vaughn concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [CA-920-1310-FI; CACA 42933]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease.

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of Public Law 97-451, Hamar Associates timely filed a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease CACA 42933 for lands in San Luis Obispo County, California, and it was accompanied by all required rentals and royalties accruing from June 1, 2005, the date of termination.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bonnie J. Edgerly, Land Law Examiner, Branch of Adjudication, Division of Energy & Minerals, BLM California State Office, 2800 Cottage Way, W-1834, Sacramento, California 95825, (916) 978-4370.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    No valid lease has been issued affecting the lands. The lessee has agreed to new lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction                           ( print page 67191)                        thereof and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and has reimbursed the Bureau of Land Management for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The Lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate the lease effective June 1, 2005, subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.                

Dated: October 19, 2005.

Debra Marsh,

Supervisor, Branch of Adjudication, Division of Energy & Minerals.

[FR Doc. 05-22038 Filed 11-3-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ameriprise Certificate Company (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Abu M. Arif, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jason S. Bartylla, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:August 10, 2020By:/s/ Abu M. ArifAbu M. ArifChief Executive Officer


Date:August 10, 2020By:/s/ Jason S. BartyllaJason S. BartyllaChief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-41251 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LEONEL BALDERAS-ALVARADO, also known as Ricardo Silva, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-45-ALL

-------------------- June 15, 2001 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Leonel Balderas-Alvarado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Balderas-Alvarado has filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the brief, the record, and the response of Balderas-Alvarado discloses one possible nonfrivolous issue for appeal. His offense level and sentence were increased for his having been deported after a prior aggravated-felony conviction that was not alleged in his indictment. An argumentNo. 00-41251 -2- that the prior conviction should have been alleged in the indictment is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). However, the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 489 (2000) (finding it “arguable that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided”). Counsel could have raised the issue on appeal in order to preserve it for Supreme Court review in light of Apprendi

. In light of this possible nonfrivolous issue for appeal, we deny counsel’s motion to withdraw. By our denying the motion to withdraw, Balderas-Alvarado preserves the Almendarez-Torres issue for further review. We pretermit further briefing, however, and AFFIRM the judgment of the district court because Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 490;

see also United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000)(noting that the Supreme Court in Apprendi expressly declined to overrule Almendarez-Torres ), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). This court must follow the precedent set in Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation and citation omitted). Finally, the record has not been adequately developed for us to consider Balderas-Alvarado’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel arguments on direct appeal. See United States v. Haese , 162 F.3d 359, 363 (5 th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is DENIED, and the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5375 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5375

    To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 relating to de minimis entries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2010

  Mr. Owens (for himself and Mr. McDermott) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 relating to de minimis entries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Customs De Minimis Adjustment Act of 
2010''.

SEC. 2. DE MINIMIS ENTRIES.

    Section 321(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 
1321(a)(2)(C)) is amended by striking ``$200'' and inserting 
``$1,000''.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of A ppeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 15, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 04-51321

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellee

v.
HOOVER ELIVER CAPACHO-PINTO Defendant - Appellant

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (04-CR-360)

---------------------
Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS OR DERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate
sentence is granted.

IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to remand

case to the di strict court for resentencing in light of the U.S.
Supreme Court’s recent opinion in US v. Book er and this Court’s opinion in US v. Mares is granted.

________________

* Pursuant to 5 th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determin ed that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 th Cir. R. 47.5.4.IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed alternative motion

to extend time to file appellee’s brief 14 days from the Court’s
denial of appellee’s motion to vacate a nd remand is denied as

moot.
*i,j /' /, 82,2)3 "Oi

ftpeltfcos-fa -£/e*M

awiAoosta.Cte*