alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5212] 

# AGENCY:

Department of State. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Antonello da Messina: Sicily's Renaissance Master,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with foreign lenders. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about December 12, 2005, until on or about March 5, 2006, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julianne Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/453-8049). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: October 27, 2005. 

C. Miller Crouch, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 05-21937 Filed 11-2-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
# C_2007217EN.01000101.xml

| 15.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4706 — Superior Essex/Invex)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 217/01)

On 26 July 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4706. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4706. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
Filed 4/10/17 (reposted to correct file date)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CHRISTOPHER JAMES SLOAT,

Defendant and Appellant.

 B270080

 (Los Angeles County

 Super. Ct. No. KA057527)

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los 

Angeles County, Salvatore T. Sirna, Judge. Reversed and 

remanded.

Tyrone A. Sandoval, under appointment by the Court of 

Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, 

Chief Assistant Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Mary Sanchez and Analee J. Brodie, 

Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
2

Defendant, Christopher James Sloat, filed a Penal Code1

section 1170.18, subdivision (f) petition. Defendant sought to 

have his 2002 felony petty theft with a prior conviction (former § 

666, Stats. 2000, ch. 135, § 134, p. 1991)) designated a 

misdemeanor. At a hearing defendant did not attend and where 

he was not represented by counsel, the trial court denied the 

petition. The trial court impliedly agreed with the prosecutor 

that defendant was ineligible because the theft was not from an 

“open commercial business.” This was an apparent reference to 

section 459.5, subdivision (a), which governs the crime of 

shoplifting. Defendant argues, and the Attorney General 

concedes, defendant is eligible to have his conviction under 

former section 666 reduced to a misdemeanor. The Attorney 

General states: “[D]efendant was not seeking to have his . . . 

conviction reduced to misdemeanor shoplifting. Rather, he 

sought reduction of his felony petty theft with priors conviction to 

misdemeanor petty theft. . . . Unlike shoplifting (§ 459.5[, subd. 

(a)]), petty theft (§ 490.2[, subd. (a)]) does not require that a 

defendant enter a commercial establishment during regular 

business hours.” We agree with the Attorney General’s analysis. 

 

1 Further statutory references are to the Penal Code.
3

The order denying defendant’s petition to designate as a 

misdemeanor his conviction for petty theft with a prior is 

reversed. Upon remittitur issuance, the trial court is to 

reconsider the petition in light of our analysis. 

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

TURNER, P.J.

We concur:

KRIEGLER, J.

BAKER, J.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

El- fllfford 7. Eobfnson, Zacratarg-‘treasurer Te;aa State Board cf Chiropody Smminers 826 lair Suil.dlnZ Fort Zorth, Texas
Cear Sir: opilionX0. O-1414

f.e : PO&~ of the secretarptrcas~uer of Texas State Soerd of Cbirooody 2azimrs.
Thiswill ackooxledge r+c+lpt of ycur letter tog,etMrwith tho bosd coztainsd therein requesting t.he WprSvhi 3f t3e ‘3orC by the Atto4”Oey

General.
Artlcls 4568, Vernon~s Civil :%atutes., reads in *art as follows: wTb mxsb,Sarr of the Ptcta SoarC of’ Chiropody 3radhere shell,before enteridg upon t2eduties of tt;s:r cffioes, qualify,by subsarlbl~, to, baforec notary public or other officer authorize@ by lax to ntiidster osths, and filing with the %ecratzry of state, the conetitutional 06th of offics, Tb.egehall, RS soon aa organized,sod biennially thereafter in the xoonthof Januerj-,olcct fro= tfieir mzber a .oreald+nt,vlcepresidentand o+cretarg-treasursr. The secretargtreasurer,before entsring u?on his duti+s, shall file

a bondwith ths Searetsqr S State for such s*m as will be twice the mount of ca@h on hand at the tiios the bond is filed; provided, ho*tevsr, t2at the arcouatof said bond ahall, In so case, bc lers than Five Thoueond 90llora (@,OOO). Said bond shallbe pay-ible to tba Govsrnor of this ytate, ror tkiebeceilt or soId i?oard;shall be oonditioo+il upon the faithful piarforzaooe of the duties of such officer;and sttall be fn such ior as pay be sr~proved by the kttorney Csneral OS t’..is State; snd sh61i be executed by 0,surety oompony, as surety, snd be apFrov+d by ih+ ?tnte 9o::rd of Chiropody ?rfminers...mDr. Clifford :!.Eobinson, ?age 2.

The bond presentedfor approval is in the amount of live Thousand ($S,COO.OO)Eollars which is sufiicient,protided the azouut of cash on hand does not exceed the suz of Twenty-five Hundred (.X,5CO.O0)Collars, and tie bond nust be approved by t!ie State Board of Chiropody Zxminers before filingwith the Secretary of State.
After having carefully exanlned the above mntioned bond xe find it in accordancevSth the provisions of Article 4562, Vernon's Civil Statutes,and as above stated, the bond mst be approved by the State Eoard of Chiropody -!Sanlners before tiling 7dth the Secretary of State, and if the mount of cash now on hand exceeds the suznof Twenty-five %ndred (62,500.OO) Dollars the secretary-treasureris required to zaice a bond twice the amount of cash on hand at the tize the bond Is riled, and Ff the amount of castion Land at the tize 0S filing the bocc is less than Twenty-five ::uhdred(;2,500.CO),Dollars the bond in the amount of Five Thousand ($5,000.00)Dollars is suiflcient.
Xlth kindest personal regards, -wetire

Yours very truly

AFFi?OV'fC

OCT 10, 1939
Robert E. Zepke (signed) :.CTT::G ATTOEG?f $ZI-GAL OF TI?XAS 

## (sit-wed 1 Ardell ?~llliams Assistant

[CTXZ?ZD)Approved

Opinion Comittee By a.3.s.,chalrman
# L_2008048EN.01008801.xml

| 22.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 48/88 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 48/88

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1995/2006 of 13 December 2006 amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 390 of 30 December 2006
  )

On page 7, point 12 (amendment of Article 26 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 — Financial Regulation), after point b (replacement of paragraph 2, first subparagraph), a new point (ba) is inserted as follows:

| ‘(ba) | in paragraph 2, the second subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:
  “The procedure provided for in Article 24(2) and (3) shall apply. If the Commission proposal is not agreed to by both arms of the budgetary authority and there is a failure to arrive at a common position on the utilisation of this reserve, the European Parliament and the Council shall refrain from acting on the Commission's proposal for a transfer.”’ |
| --- | --- |

‘(ba)

in paragraph 2, the second subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:

“The procedure provided for in Article 24(2) and (3) shall apply. If the Commission proposal is not agreed to by both arms of the budgetary authority and there is a failure to arrive at a common position on the utilisation of this reserve, the European Parliament and the Council shall refrain from acting on the Commission's proposal for a transfer.”’

---
# L_2007130EN.01004802.xml

| 22.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 130/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 130/48

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 243/2007 of 6 March 2007 concerning the authorisation of 3-phytase (Natuphos) as a feed additive

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 73 of 13 March 2007
  )

On page 5, in the eighth column of the table in the Annex, for the species or category of animal ‘Pigs for fattening’, point 2:

for:

‘Recommended dose per kilogram of complete feedingstuff: 400500 FTU.’

read:

‘Recommended dose per kilogram of complete feedingstuff: 400–500 FTU.’

On page 5, in the eighth column of the table in the Annex, for the species or category of animal ‘Chickens for fattening’, point 2:

for:

‘Recommended dose per kilogram of complete feedingstuff: 500700 FTU.’

read:

‘Recommended dose per kilogram of complete feedingstuff: 500–700 FTU.’

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 208 (Friday, October 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 62161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21537]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements filed the week ending October 7, 
2005

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: OST-2005-22659.
    Date Filed: October 4, 2005.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: GVA/SRC/003/05 dated 19 August 2005 and GVA/SRC/005 dated 
August 28, 2005, i.e. Resolution 801r Intended effective date: 1 
November 2005.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 05-21537 Filed 10-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
EX-10.3




 Exhibit 10.3 
  





 
 February 28, 2022 

Attention: Vincent Donargo 

vince.donargo@calumetspecialty.com 
 Subject: Promotion
Letter 
 Dear Vince, 
 On behalf of Calumet GP, LLC, I am
pleased to promote you to the role of Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer effective May 1, 2022. 
 Effective May 1, 2022,
your annual salary will be $400,000. You will continue to be eligible to participate in the Calumet Short-Term Incentive Plan with a bonus target of 100% of your annual base salary based on company financial metrics and your own individual
contributions. If minimum financial metrics and minimum individual contributions are met, it would pay at 50% of your base salary and at its maximum it would pay at 200% of your base annual salary. If actual performance falls between the various
levels (between minimum and target for instance), the annual bonus award will be prorated, up to the maximum potential award. Should the Company not meet its minimum financial target, no awards will be issued regardless of individual contributions.

 You will continue to be eligible to participate in the Calumet GP, LLC Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan. In your new role, your annual LTIP
target will be 80% of your annual base salary, and these units have a 3-year cliff vest requirement. Any award under the Plan will take into consideration your individual contribution as well as the
achievement of Company financial targets. Should the Company not meet its minimum financial target, no awards will be issued under the Plan. 
 All other
terms and conditions of your at-will employment remain the same. 
 I am pleased to have you take on this new and
exciting role and look forward to your future success. Please let me know if you have any questions. 
 Sincerely, 

/s/ Todd Borgmann 
 Todd Borgmann, Executive Vice
President & Chief Financial Officer 
 Agreed and accepted: 
  

					
	/s/ Vincent Donargo	 		 	3/1/2022
	Vincent Donargo	 		 	Date