alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OFETS PAYPHONES, INC.PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, MICHAEL H. McCLELLAN, am the ChiefFinancial Officer of ETS Payphones, Inc. (the “Company”).

 

This certification is being furnishedpursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005(the “Report”).

 

I hereby certify that to the best of myknowledge:

 

(a)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)                                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of thedates and for the periods covered by the Report.

 

Dated: August 17, 2005

 

 
|   | /s/ MICHAEL H. MCCLELLAN |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Michael H.  McClellan    |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to ETS Payphones, Inc. andwill be retained by ETS Payphones, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 213 (Friday, November 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 67188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21776]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4980-N-44]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

DATES: Effective November 4, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: October 27, 2005.
Mark R. Johnston,
Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.
[FR Doc. 05-21776 Filed 11-3-05; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
**Exhibit 32.2****CFO CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC §1350, as adopted), DanielJ. Miller, the Chief Financial Officer of PlanetOut Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, tothe best of his knowledge:**1.**The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, and to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and**2.**The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.     **InWitness Whereof,**the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 9th day of August 2006.       /s/ DANIEL J. MILLER     Daniel J. Miller    Chief Financial Officer  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is notbeing filed as part of this report. A signed original of this written statement required by Section906 has been provided to PlanetOut Inc. and will be retained by PlanetOut Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

J.R., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE,

Tampa, FL, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 23-0514

Issued: April 12, 2023

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On March 2, 2023 appellant filed an appeal from an August 29, 2022 nonmerit decision of 

the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards

assigned Docket No. 23-0514.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to 

review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act

(FECA).

1

 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s 

review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of 

OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the August 29, 2022 decision was February 25, 2023. As 

appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until March 2, 2023, more than 180 days after the

August 29, 2022 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 23-0514 is 

untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not explained 

her failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to establish 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2 20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the 

date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.”
2

compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP within 180 

days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 23-

0514, must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-0514 is dismissed.

Issued: April 12, 2023

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id. at 

§ 501.6(d).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,500,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,500,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (35,593)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,928)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (41,521)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (41,521)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7219 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JONATHAN WAYNE HADRICK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CR92-402)

Submitted: December 15, 2005 Decided: December 21, 2005

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Wayne Hadrick, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein,

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Wayne Hadrick appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West

2000 & Supp. 2005). In criminal cases, a defendant must file his

notice of appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R.

App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); United States v. Alvarez, 210 F.3d 309, 310

(5th Cir. 2000) (holding that § 3582 proceeding is criminal in

nature and ten-day appeal period applies and collecting cases

adopting rule). With or without a motion, the district court may

grant an extension of time to file of up to thirty days upon a

showing of excusable neglect or good cause. Fed. R. App. P.

4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985).

These time periods are mandatory and jurisdictional. United

States v. Raynor, 939 F.2d 191, 196 (4th Cir. 1991).

The district court entered its order denying the

§ 3582(c)(2) motion on June 6, 2005. The ten-day appeal period

expired on June 20, 2005. See Fed. R. App. P. 26(a)(2). Hadrick

filed his notice of appeal, at the earliest, on June 28,

2005—outside the ten-day appeal period but within the thirty-day

excusable neglect period. Although Hadrick filed a motion to

extend the appeal period under Rule 4(b)(4) based upon excusable

neglect, the district court denied the motion. Hadrick does not

challenge the court’s denial of that motion in his informal
- 3 -

appellate brief. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(b) (“The Court will limit

its review to the issues raised in the informal brief.”). 

Because the district court declined to extend the appeal

period, Hadrick’s notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# L_2007181EN.01001401.xml

| 11.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 181/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 181/14

---

COUNCIL JOINT ACTION 2007/484/CFSP

of 10 July 2007

extending Joint Action 2006/439/CFSP regarding a further contribution of the European Union to the conflict settlement process in Georgia/South Ossetia

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 14 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 27 June 2006, the Council adopted Joint Action 2006/439/CFSP (1), which expires on 30 June 2007. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 27 June 2006, the Council adopted Joint Action 2006/439/CFSP (1), which expires on 30 June 2007.

| (2) | On the basis of the assessment of the OSCE Mission to Georgia and of the recommendations of the European Union Special Representative for the South Caucasus and of the Commission, the EU contribution should be continued until the end of 2007, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of the assessment of the OSCE Mission to Georgia and of the recommendations of the European Union Special Representative for the South Caucasus and of the Commission, the EU contribution should be continued until the end of 2007,

HAS ADOPTED THIS JOINT ACTION:

Article 1

Joint Action 2006/439/CFSP is hereby extended until 31 December 2007.

Article 2

The financial reference amount referred to in Article 4 of Joint Action 2006/439/CFSP shall cover the expenditure related to the period from 1 July 2006 until 31 December 2007.

Article 3

This Joint Action shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Article 4

This Joint Action shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 July 2007.

For the Council

The President

F. TEIXEIRA DOS SANTOS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 174, 28.6.2006, p. 9.

1

---
Order entered December 8, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01272-CR

CODY ALLAN SRADER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-80009-2015

ORDER

On November 10, 2015, the Court granted the motion of Craig Price to withdraw as 

appellant’s attorney and ordered the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant. 

We have received a loose copy of the trial court’s order appointing Maria T. Tu to represent 

appellant. Accordingly, we DIRECT the Clerk to list Maria T. Tu to represent appellant on this 

appeal.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### IN RE REVOCATION OF THE LICENSE TO OPERATE A MOTOR VEHICLE OF THOMAS DELAND CHURCH

No. 7625SC23

(Filed 19 May 1976)

Appeal and Error § 44— failure to file brief — dismissal of appeal

Appeal is dismissed by the Court of Appeals *ex mero motu*for failure of appellant to file a brief. App. R. 13(c).

Appeal by petitioner from *Briggs, Judge.*Judgment entered 5 September 1975 in Superior Court, Catawba County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 15 April 1976.

On 25 March 1975, petitioner, Thomas Deland Church, received notice from the Division of Motor Vehicles that his motor vehicle operator’s license was suspended, pursuant to the provisions of G.S. 20-16.2, for a period of six months for willfully refusing to submit to a breathalyzer test after having been arrested for driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Petitioner requested and was afforded a hearing before the Division pursuant to G.S. 20-16.2 (d). After the hearing, petitioner received notice that the suspension should be sustained effective 3 June 1975. He petitioned the Superior Court for a hearing *de novo*as to the validity of the suspension pursuant to G.S. 20-16.2 (e) and G.S. 20-25 and for an order suspending the effective date of the license suspension until after a determination of the matter. Judge Ferrell entered an order on 3 June 1975 staying the effective date of the license suspension pending the hearing.

From judgment entered on 5 September 1975, after the hearing dissolving “all restraining or stay orders” and affirming the order of revocation, petitioner appealed.

*No counsel appeared for the State.*

*No counsel appeared for petitioner appellant.*

HEDRICK, Judge.

Rule 13(c) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure provides:

> *“Consequence of Failure to File and Serve Briefs.*If an appellant fails to file and serve his brief within the time allowed, the appeal may be dismissed on motion of an *512appellee or on the court’s own initiative. If an appellee fails to file and serve his brief within the time allowed, he may not be heard in oral argument except by permission of the court.”

Appellant has not filed a brief in this Court. The Court, *ex mero motu,*dismisses the appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Chief Judge Brock and Judge Clark concur.
# L_2008276EN.01005001.xml

| 17.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 276/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 276/50

---

Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2007/777/EC of 29 November 2007 laying down the animal and public health conditions and model certificates for imports of certain meat products and treated stomachs, bladders and intestines for human consumption from third countries and repealing Decision 2005/432/EC

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 312 of 30 November 2007
  )

On page 51, in Article 3, point (a):

for:

| ‘(a) | comply with the conditions concerning origin and treatment set out in Annex I(1) and (2); and’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(a)

comply with the conditions concerning origin and treatment set out in Annex I(1) and (2); and’,

read:

| ‘(a) | comply with the conditions concerning origin and treatment set out in Annex I(1) or (2); and’ |
| --- | --- |

‘(a)

comply with the conditions concerning origin and treatment set out in Annex I(1) or (2); and’

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellant

v.

RONALD LEWIS WEBB JR.,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 75 MAP 2018

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellant

v.

RONALD LEWIS WEBB JR.,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 76 MAP 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of September, 2020, the Joint Application to Remand is

GRANTED , and the matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming

County for further proceedings.
EXHIBIT 12.1

              SIMONDS INDUSTRIES INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
      STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (Amount in thousands, except ratios)
<TABLE><CAPTION>

                                                 --------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            Company
                                                 --------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                           Year Ended
                                                 --------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    1996         1997         1998         1999         2000
                                                 ----------  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
<S>                                                <C>          <C>          <C>         <C>          <C>
Earnings:
  Pre-tax income from continuing
     Operations                                      7,054        8,752        2,321        2,652         (462)
  Add fixed charges:
     Interest on indebtedness                        4,399        4,963        7,900       10,948       10,834
     Portion of rents representative
       of the interest factor                          203          213          275          305          358
                                                 ----------  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
Income as adjusted                                  11,656       13,928       10,496       13,905       10,730

Fixed charges:
  Interest on indebtedness                           4,399        4,963        7,900       10,948       10,834
  Capitalized interest
  Portion of rents representative
    of the interest factor                             203          213          275          305          358
                                                 ----------  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
  Total Fixed Charges                                4,602        5,176        8,175       11,253       11,192

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                     2.5          2.7          1.3          1.2          1.0
                                                 ==========  ===========  ===========  ===========  ===========

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Saed Mohseni, Chief Executive Officer, in connection with the Report on
Form 10-Q of McCormick & Schmicks Seafood Restaurants, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the Report), hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of McCormick & Schmicks Seafood Restaurants, Inc.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ SAED MOHSENI       
|Saed Mohseni           
|Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 8, 2006
<Page>
Exhibit 32.1


                                WRITTEN STATEMENT
                                       OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         The undersigned hereby certify that, to the best of the knowledge of
the undersigned, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2003 filed by Implant Sciences Corporation with the Securities and
Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.


Date:  October 1, 2003                    By: /s/  ANTHONY J. ARMINI
                                              --------------------------
                                               Anthony J. Armini, President
                                               and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  October 1, 2003                    By: /s/  DIANE J. RYAN
                                              ----------------------
                                               Diane J. Ryan, VP Finance
                                               and Chief Financial Officer