alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 1**  **649**

WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II; BABY J.F.D., c/o William S. Davis, II; ESTATE OF WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, SR., Deceased , Plaintiff s - Appellant s ,

v.
ALBERT J. SINGER; WAKE COUNTY GOVERNMENT; DANIELLE DOYLE; SYDNEY J. BATCH; BATCH, POORE & WILLIAMS; MICHELE JAWORSKI SUAREZ; MELANIE A. SHEKITA; MICHELLE SAVAGE; ERIC CRAIG CHASSE; LISA SELLERS; CHARLOTTE MITCHELL; WENDY KIRWAN; SONJI CARLTON; NANCEY BERSON; SUSAN GARVEY, Doctor ; ROBERT B. RADAR; MARGARET EAGLES; RICHARD CROUTHARMEL , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News

. Rebecca Beach Smith , Chief District Judge. ( 4:1 3

- cv - 00 007

- RBS

- DEM )

Submitted : June 20, 2013 Decided: June 25, 2013

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

William Scott Davis, II , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
William Scott Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for an order to file exhibits under seal, motions to appoint counsel, and motions for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order . T his court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (200 6 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (200 6 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). The

o rder Davis seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Davis’ motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
| (1)   |         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   |         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      NFC. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      March 11, 2009 |   | /s/    | DAVID J. JOHANNESON              |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                      |   |   | David      J. Johanneson         |
|                      |   |   | Principal      Executive Officer |

| Date:      March 11, 2009 |   | /s/    | WILLIAM V. MCMENAMIN             |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                      |   |   | William      V. McMenamin        |
|                      |   |   | Principal      Financial Officer |

| Date:      March 11, 2009 |   | /s/    | DAVID L. DERFELT                  |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|                      |   |   | David      L. Derfelt             |
|                      |   |   | Principal      Accounting Officer |

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Hill International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Irvin E. Richter, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Irvin E. RichterIrvin E. RichterChairman and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: January 13, 2010
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk December 5, 2012

s1128 

# Order

December 5, 2012

144186

ALEX A. LEMERAND,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 144186

COA: 298637

Court of Claims: 09

- 000067

- MZ

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN REGENTS,

Defendant

- Appellee.

________________________________________

By order of April 23, 2012, the application for leave to appeal the October 20,

2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in

McCahan v Brennan (Docket No. 142765). On order of the Court, the case having been

decided o n August 20, 2012, 492 Mich 730 (2012), the application is again considered,

and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be

reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH

, M ARILYN K ELLY

, and H ATHAWAY

, JJ., would grant leave to app eal.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Justin Ray Childs, Appellant

No. 06

- 12

- 00136

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 102nd District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 12F0310

- 102 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered b y Justice Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appellant, Justin Ray Childs, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 2, 20 13 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 21

- 1101

_____________________________
T AREYAN C OOKS , Appellant,

v.

R ICKY D. D IXON , Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
, Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the County Court for Leon County

. Augustus D. Aikens , Judge

. September 6, 2022

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OWE , C.J., an d B.L. T HOMAS and L ONG , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Tareyan Cooks, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kelly R. Forren, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 32002R1758

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1758/2002 of 2 October 2002 prohibiting fishing for cod by vessels flying the flag of Portugal***Official Journal L 265 , 03/10/2002 P. 0005 - 0005*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1758/2002

of 2 October 2002

prohibiting fishing for cod by vessels flying the flag of Portugal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2846/98(2), and in particular Article 21(3) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 2555/2001 of 18 December 2001 fixing for 2002 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where limitations in catch are required(3), lays down quotas for cod for 2002.

(2) In order to ensure compliance with the provisions relating to the quantity limits on catches of stocks subject to quotas, the Commission must fix the date by which catches made by vessels flying the flag of a Member State are deemed to have exhausted the quota allocated.

(3) According to the information received by the Commission, catches of cod in the waters of ICES sub-areas I and IIb (EC waters) by vessels flying the flag of Portugal or registered in Portugal have exhausted the quota allocated for 2002. Portugal has prohibited fishing for this stock from 10 September 2002. This date should be adopted in this Regulation also,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Catches of cod in the waters of ICES sub-areas I and IIb (EC waters) by vessels flying the flag of Portugal or registered in Portugal are hereby deemed to have exhausted the quota allocated to Portugal for 2002.

Fishing for cod in the waters of ICES sub-areas I and IIb (EC waters) by vessels flying the flag of Portugal or registered in Portugal is hereby prohibited, as are the retention on board, transhipment and landing of this stock caught by the above vessels after the date of application of this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 10 September 2002.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 October 2002.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 261, 20.10.1993, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 358, 31.12.1998, p. 5.

(3) OJ L 347, 31.12.2001, p. 1.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before December 1, 2005 to be assured of consideration. 

## Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) 

*OMB Number:*                     1520-0001.                 

*Type of Review:*                     Extension.                 

*Title:*                     Owner's Affidavit of Partial Destruction of Mutilated Currency.                 

*Form:*                     BEP form 5283.                 

*Description:*                     The Office of Currency Standards, Bureau of Engraving and Printing requests owners of partially destroyed U.S. currency to complete a notarized affidavit (BEP 5283) for each claim submitted when substantial portions of notes are missing.                 

*Respondents:*                     Individuals or households.                 

*Estimated Total Burden Hours:*                     90 hours.                 

*OMB Number:*                     1520-0002.                 

*Type of Review:*                     Extension.                 

*Title:*                     Claims for Amounts Due in the Case of Deceased Owner of Mutilated Currency.                 

*Form:*                     BEP form 5287.                 

*Description:*                     The Office of Currency Standards, Bureau of Engraving and Printing uses form BEP 5287 to determine ownership in cases of a deceased owner mutilated currency.                 

*Respondents:*                     Individuals or households.                 

*Estimated Total Burden Hours:*                     110 hours.                 

*Clearance Officer:*                     Pamela V. Grayson, (202) 874-2212, Bureau of Engraving and Printing, 14th & C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20228.                 

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7316, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                 

Michael A. Robinson, 

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05-21743 Filed 10-31-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4840-01-P
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, J. Scott Blouin, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofConexant Systems, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Conexant Systems,Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis Annual Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this AnnualReport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this Annual Report is being prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this Annual Report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this Annual Report based on suchevaluation; and c. disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Dated: December 9, 2004   /s/ J. Scott Blouin    J. Scott Blouin  Senior Vice President and     Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.8
​
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
​
This First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (the "Amendment") dated effective as of October 9, 2021 (the "Execution Date"), is made and entered into by and between Farmland Partners Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Farmland”), and Farmland Partners Operating Partnership, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership” and, together with Farmland, the “Company”), each with its principal place of business at 4600 S. Syracuse Street, Suite 1450, Denver, CO 80237, and Luca Fabbri residing at the address on file with the Company (the “Employee”).
​
WHEREAS, Employee and the Company are parties to a Restated and Amended Employment Agreement dated as of December 13, 2018 (the “Agreement”);
 ​
WHEREAS, the Company and Employee now wish to amend Employee’s title in the Agreement as set forth herein;
​
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, of the mutual promises contained herein and of other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
​

1.Extension of Closing and Possession. Section 1(a) of the Agreement is amended by replacing “Chief Financial Officer” with “President.”
​
2.Reaffirmation. Except as expressly provided herein, the Parties hereby reaffirm each and every of the terms and conditions of the Agreement, all of which shall remain in full force and effect.
​
3.Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed and acknowledged in one or more Counterparts, and the individual signatures pages and associated acknowledgments may be attached to a single copy of this Agreement to create a single original document.
​
SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
​
​
​
​
​
​

1
​



​
​
​
​
​
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement to be effective as of the date first above written.
​
	​
Farmland Partners Inc. 
​
By: /s/ ​ ​ Paul A. Pittman​ ​​ ​
​
Name:Paul A. Pittman
​
Title:Chief Executive Officer 
​
​

	Farmland Partners Operating Partnership, LP
​
By: Farmland Partners OP GP, LLC, its general partner
​
By: Farmland Partners Inc., its sole member
​
By: /s/ ​ ​ Paul A. Pittman​ ​​ ​
​
Name: Paul A. Pittman
​
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
​
​
EMPLOYEE
​
​
/s/  Luca Fabbri ​ ​            ​ ​
Luca Fabbri

	​




​

2
​
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement Nos. 333-126062, 333-86686, 333-86688, 333-53278, 033-88634, 333-41632, 333-41634, 333-41670, 333-28459, 333-07831 and 033-88638 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 29, 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion andincludes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87, as amended), relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2003, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/s/ DELOITTE &TOUCHE LLP 

San Diego, California 

March 15, 2006
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Majority and 

Dissenting Opinions filed April 9, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00021-CV

IN RE MARY RUFFIN, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

County Court No. 2

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV-0091816

MEMORANDUM DISSENTING OPINION

Persisting in my view that our duty as judges is to reach a decision on the 

merits based on a proper record and that due process and due course of law require 

that this court give notice when the original-proceeding record does not comply 

with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, I would give relator ten-days’ notice 

of involuntary dismissal for failure to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 52.7(a) requiring (1) a certified or sworn copy of every document that is 
2

material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying 

proceeding and (2) a properly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony 

from any underlying proceeding, including any exhibits offered in evidence, or a 

statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with the matter 

complained. Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a); see In re Kholaif, 624 S.W.3d 228, 231 

(order), mand. dism’d, 615 S.W.3d 369 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2020) 

(orig. proceeding); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1) (necessary contents of 

petition); Tex. Civ. Prac. & Crim. Code Ann. § 132.001 (authorizing unsworn 

declarations).

I dissent from the court’s failure to provide notice and an opportunity to 

cure. I express no opinion on the merits of the petition for a writ of mandamus.

/s Charles A. Spain

Justice 

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Spain, and Wilson (Spain, J., dissenting).
EXHIBIT 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

Direct Subsidiaries of The Ackerley Group, Inc.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Jurisdiction of
Subsidiary                                            Incorporation             Assumed Business Names
<S>                                                   <C>                       <C>

Ackerley Airport Advertising, Inc.                    Washington                AK Media/Airport

AK Media Group, Inc.                                  Washington                AK Media/Florida
                                                                                AK Media/Massachusetts
                                                                                AK Media/Northwest
                                                                                Full House Sports and Entertainment
                                                                                Northwest Sports Sales
                                                                                Seattle SuperSonics
                                                                                Seattle Seadogs
                                                                                KVOS TV
                                                                                KGET TV
                                                                                KCBA TV
                                                                                KFTY TV
                                                                                KKTV
                                                                                KHHO (AM)

Central NY News, Inc.                                 Washington                None

KJR Radio, Inc.                                       Washington                None

SSI, Inc.                                             Washington                Seattle SuperSonics

TC Aviation, Inc.                                     Oregon                    None

WIXT TV, Inc.                                         Washington                None


Direct Subsidiaries of AK Media Group, Inc.

<CAPTION>
                                                      Jurisdiction of
Subsidiary                                            Incorporation             Assumed Business Names
<S>                                                   <C>                       <C>

KVOS TV Ltd.                                          British Columbia          None

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 Signature:
    
    /s/ Steven G. RollsSteven G. RollsChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)Date:
    
    August 7, 2009