alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ares Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), R. Kipp deVeer, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Penni F. Roll, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

 

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 2,   2016                                           |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                    |   |
| /s/ R. Kipp deVeer                                                      |   |
| R. Kipp deVeer*Chief Executive Officer (principal executive   officer)* |   |
|                                                                    |   |
| Date: November 2,   2016                                           |   |
|                                                                    |   |
| /s/ Penni F. Roll                                                       |   |
| Penni F. Roll*Chief Financial Officer (principal financial   officer)*  |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ares Capital Corporation and will be retained by Ares Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NHY/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DENIA RUTH MURGA-SOSA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-74022

Agency No. A027-622-573

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 16, 2010** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Denia Ruth Murga-Sosa, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her motion to reopen removal

FILED

FEB 25 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
NHY/Research 2 07-74022

proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037,

1039 (9th Cir. 2002), and de novo questions of law, Ram v. INS, 243 F.3d 510, 516

(9th Cir. 2001). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. 

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Murga-Sosa’s second

motion to reopen as numerically barred, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(1) (limiting

party to one motion to reopen proceedings), and concluding that Petitioner failed to

establish grounds for waiving the numerical restriction, cf. Varela v. INS, 204 F.3d

1237, 1240 (9th Cir. 2000) (numerical limits may be waived in cases of fraud as

long as the petitioner acts with due diligence). 

We lack jurisdiction to consider Murga-Sosa’s contention that the IJ did not

give her notice regarding the consequences of failing to depart because she failed

to raise it before the agency. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.

2004) (noting that due process challenges that are “procedural in nature” must be

exhausted).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Charles Bellino

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 31 Conn. App. 385 (AC 10515), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Whether the Appellate Court properly held that the instructions on self-defense, General Statutes § 53a-19, did not abuse the court’s discretion, where it did not instruct on the statutory duty to retreat and the limitations on that duty?

*“2.*Whether the Appellate Court properly held that the instructions on self-defense, relative to the *918subjective-objective test employed by the jury in evaluating the degree of force used, were correct?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14802.

*Lauren Weisfeld,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

*Carolyn K. Longstreth,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided July 8, 1993
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 506 

To provide immediate fiscal relief to cities experiencing serious budget deficits 

by providing funds for payments to qualified local governments. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 14, 2009 

Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide immediate fiscal relief to cities experiencing serious budget deficits by providing funds for payments to 

qualified local governments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENTS TO QUALIFIED LOCAL GOVERN4 MENTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—From amounts appropriated 

6 under this section the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay 

7 to each qualified local government an amount that is based 

8 on and proportional to the population of the area that 

9 under State law is under the jurisdiction of that qualified 

10 local government. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 506 IH

1 (b) USE OF FUNDS.—Amounts paid to a qualified 

2 local government under this section may be used to im3 prove public safety, clean and maintain streets, and pre4 serve services benefitting children and youth, as otherwise 

5 authorized by State and local law. 

6 (c) QUALIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT DEFINED.—In 

7 this section the term ‘‘qualified local government’’ means 

8 any local government having jurisdiction under State law 

9 over an area having a population of 1,000,000 or more. 

10 (d) APPROPRIATION.—There is appropriated to carry 

11 out this section $7,800,000,000 for fiscal year 2009. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report of River Rock Entertainment Authority (the “Authority”) onForm 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”),each of the undersigned officers does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tosuch officers knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Authority.

 
| By:                     | /s/ DAVID FENDRICK     |   |
|-------------------------|------------------------|--------|
| David Fendrick          |                   |
| Chief Executive Officer |                   |
| November 18, 2010  |                   |
|                    |                   |
| By:                     | /s/ JOSEPH R. CALLAHAN |   |
| Joseph R. Callahan      |                   |
| Chief Financial Officer |                   |
| November 18, 2010  |                   |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the RiverRock Entertainment Authority and will be retained by the Authority andfurnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Samuel J. FARROW, Jr., Appellant.

No. ED 81300.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division.

July 15, 2003.

Albert C. Lowes, Cape Girardeau, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Adriane Dixon Crouse, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Samuel J. Farrow, Jr. (“Farrow”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon his convictions of multiple counts of kidnapping and sexual abuse occurring on or about July and November of 2000.

In his first two points on appeal, Farrow argues the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress statements made during custodial interrogation because: (1) he lacked the mental capacity to make a voluntary, knowing and intelligent waiver of his constitutional rights; and (2) the statements were obtained after he invoked his right to counsel. In his third point on appeal, Farrow argues the trial court erred in failing to find him not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect because he proved by a preponderance of the evidence that he was suffering from a mental disease or defect at the time the crimes were committed, making him incapable of knowing and appreciating the nature, quality or wrongfulness of his conduct.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Flexible Solutions International, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 1) of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  December 5, 2005                    /s/ DANIEL B. O'BRIEN
                                           ---------------------
                                           Daniel B. O'Brien
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
# L_2007330EN.01006001.xml

| 15.12.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 330/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 330/60

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2007/787/EC of 29 November 2007 on the conclusion of the Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 317 of 5 December 2007
  )

The publication of this decision is annulled.

---
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Miriam Blank v. Jack Nuszen

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 00379

- CV

Trial court case number: 2008

- 51454

Trial court: 246 th District Court of Harris County

On August 13, 2018 , appellant, Miriam Blank

, filed h er appellant’s brief. Appellant’s brief

contains “[s]ensitive [d]ata” as defined by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.9(a) and requires

redaction. See generally T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 9.9 (privacy protection for documents filed in civil cases).

Accordingly, we STRIKE appellant’s brief filed August 13, 2018. Appellant is ORDERED

to refile, within 7 days of the date of this order, a compliant brief containing appropriate redactions.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 13 , 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated condensed balance sheet, statements of operations and cash
flows and accompanying notes and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements and notes.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,322
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  133,864
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,286
<INVENTORY>                                    160,446
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               340,730
<PP&E>                                         312,514
<DEPRECIATION>                                 140,463
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 704,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          276,057
<BONDS>                                        121,199
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,184
<OTHER-SE>                                     252,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   704,047
<SALES>                                        588,815
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               588,815
<CGS>                                          544,966
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  544,966
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    86
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,359
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,797
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,562
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (7,800)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,238)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.17)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION  I, John Swallow, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Timberline Resources Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.    Date: August 22, 2006.  /s/ John Swallow _______________________ John Swallow (CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors)
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of REGENT  TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the
"Company") on  Form 10-K for the period  ended December 31, 2010  as  filed with
the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the  date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned  does hereby  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:   March 30, 2011

/s/ David A. Nelson
--------------------------------------------------------
David A. Nelson
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00920-CR

Jacob SAN MIGUEL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2006-CR-8798B

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 28, 2009

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

The trial court imposed sentence on December 20, 2007. Because appellant did not file a

motion for new trial, appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed by January 21, 2008. TEX. R.

APP. P. 26.2(a). Appellant, however, did not file his notice of appeal until December 15, 2008.

Given the fact that appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed, we are without jurisdiction to

entertain this appeal. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
----

| 1.  | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lincoln Educational Services Corporation; |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.  | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.  | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.  | The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5.  | The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 6, 2011                               |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                            |   |   |
|                                            |   |   |
| /s/ Cesar Ribeiro      |   |   |
| Cesar Ribeiro                                   |   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer                         |   |   |

----