alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2007271EN.01001501.xml

| 16.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 271/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 271/15

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 9 October 2007

on the appointment of one member of the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies for its third mandate

(2007/666/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Decision 2005/383/EC of 11 May 2005 (1) on the renewal of the mandate of the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies,

Whereas:

| (1) | Dr C. CASINI has resigned as a Member of the EGE, consequently to his appointment as MEP, by letter of 12 July 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Dr C. CASINI has resigned as a Member of the EGE, consequently to his appointment as MEP, by letter of 12 July 2006.

| (2) | On 15 March 2007 the Commission published a call for applications regarding the selection of a new member of the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies and a Jury composed of senior Commission staff has evaluated the applications received and prepared a shortlist for the Commission Decision, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 15 March 2007 the Commission published a call for applications regarding the selection of a new member of the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies and a Jury composed of senior Commission staff has evaluated the applications received and prepared a shortlist for the Commission Decision,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Francesco D. BUSNELLI is appointed as EGE member for the period covered by the current EGE (2005-09), as a replacement of former EGE Member Carlo CASINI.

Article 2

The new EGE member’s mandate enters into force on the same day as the adoption of the present Decision.

Done at Brussels, 9 October 2007.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 127, 20.5.2005, p. 17.

1

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133530 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133530 COA: 264367 Macomb CC: 04-003483-FC ROEDERICK MARTIN HUNTER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 8, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0618 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 12.1

                                           ZiLOG, Inc.
                         Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                    (dollars in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Year Ended December 31,
                                  ---------------------------------------------------
                                    1999       1998       1997      1996      1995
                                  --------- ----------- --------- --------- ---------
<S>                               <C>       <C>         <C>       <C>       <C>
Earnings (Loss) Before Income
  Taxes And Fixed Charges:
    Income (loss) before income
      taxes.......................($36,886)  ($101,776)  $14,826   $46,156   $65,883
    Add interest on Notes Payable.  26,600      22,462        --        --        --
    Add amortization of debt
      issuance costs..............   1,394       1,628        --        --        --
                                  --------- ----------- --------- --------- ---------
      Income (loss) before income
        taxes and fixed charges... ($8,892)   ($77,686)  $14,826   $46,156   $65,883
                                  ========= =========== ========= ========= =========
Fixed Charges:
    Interest on Notes Payable..... $26,600     $22,462     $  --     $  --     $  --
    Amortization of debt issuance
      costs.......................   1,394       1,628        --        --        --
                                  --------- ----------- --------- --------- ---------
                                   $27,994     $24,090     $  --     $  --     $  --
                                  ========= =========== ========= ========= =========
Ratio of esrnings to fixed
  charges (1).....................   (0.32)      (3.22)    N/A       N/A       N/A
                                  ========= =========== ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>

(1) Earnings before income taxes and fixed charges were insufficient to cover
   fixed charges in 1999 and 1998 by $36,886 and $101,776, respectively.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-2006

LT Case No. 2019-CF-8175-A

_____________________________

REGINALD PHELPS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark Borello, Judge.

Reginald Phelps, Lowell, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Daren L. Shippy, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

November 28, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, BOATWRIGHT, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7591
DWIGHT M. SUTTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION; RICHARD A. LANHAM, JR., Commissioner for the Maryland Division of Corrections; LLOYD L. WATERS,Warden, Maryland Correctional InstitutionHagerstown, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-96- 953-PJM) Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 27, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Dwight M. Sutton, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn T. Marrow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sutton v. Maryland Div. of Correction , No. CA-96-953-PJM (D. Md. Aug. 28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process; we deny the motion to appoint counsel.

AFFIRMED
# EUR-Lex - 32007M4555 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32007M4555

**Commission Decision of 16/02/2007 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.4555 - CNP ASSURANCES / SKANDIA VIDA) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

Brussels, 16.02.2007

SG-Greffe(2007) D/200716

To the notifying party:

Dear Sirs,

Subject: Case No. COMP/M.4555 – CNP Assurances / Skandia Vida

Notification of 12/01/2007 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1]

Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C014, 20/01/2007, page 9.

1 On 12/01/2007, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/20041 by which the undertaking CNP Assurances S.A. ("CNP", France) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Skandia Vida S.A. de Seguros y Reaseguros ("Skandia Vida", Spain) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for CNP: Life Assurance, Non-Life Assurance and Re-insurance

- for Skandia Vida: Life Assurance and Re-insurance

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph c of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

signed

Philip LOWE

Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p.32

--------------------------------------------------
Order filed November 3, 2015

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00904-CV

____________

In the Interest of B.J.C., G.J.C., and G.E.C., Children

On Appeal from the 314th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2009-04768J

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the 

termination of the parent-child relationship is at issue.

The notice of appeal was filed October 23, 2015. Appellant has established 

indigence or is presumed to be indigent. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(a). The 

reporter’s record was due within 10 days after the notice of appeal was filed. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 35.1(b); 28.4(a)(1). Part of the record has been filed, but the 

potion for which Geneva Villanueva is responsible has not been filed.
Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be 

brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is 

filed. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a). The trial and appellate courts are jointly 

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.3(c). The trial court must direct the court reporter to immediately commence 

the preparation of the reporter’s record and must arrange for a substitute reporter, 

if necessary. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(1). 

Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely in this accelerated 

appeal, we issue the following order:

We order Geneva Villanueva, the court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal on or before November 13, 2015. If Geneva Villanueva does not timely 

file the record as ordered, the court may issue an order requiring the trial court to 

hold a hearing to determine why the record has not been filed.

PER CURIAM
# C_2007275EN.01000101.xml

| 16.11.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 275/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 275/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4533 — SCA/P&G (European tissue business))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 275/01)

On 5 September 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4533. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4533. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
ND. 03-14-00173- CR.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

BRIAN TAYLOR § .

V

FROM APPEAL No .Q3-1 4-001 73-CR

§

S TRIAL COURT No .38660

THE STATE OF TEXAS § BURNET , COUNTY

rs

FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENTION OF TIME TO FILE

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW: OCT 29 2015

To the Honorable 3udge of said court of criminal appeals:: "- •-• -'-^

Comes now, BRIAN TAYLOR .petitioner, and files this

motion for extention of ninety (9>0 ) days •= in which to file a petition for Discretionary Review. In support of t^s—mation,petitioner FILED iiM

shows the court the following: npy o n ?~'--

I

Abel Acosta, Cierk

The petitioner was convicted in the 424th th District court of

BURNET , county Texas of the offence of INDECENCY WITH A

CHILD BY CONTACT in case No. 3B660 CR styled STATE OF TEXAS

Us.BRIAN TAYLOR . The petitioner appealed to the court of

appeals ^HIRD district. The case was nFFTRMFD on 14th

day of OCTOBER

II

The prBsehtndeadline for filing the petition for Discretionary

review is 14th day of NOVEMBER The petitioner has not requested

any extention prior tP this request.
Ill

Prtitioner request for an extention is based upon the following

facts: Petitioner was not notified of the decision of the court of

appeals in his case until _2_0 day of OCTOBER . Petitioner attorney

on appeal has informed petitioner that he/she will not represent

him on the petition for Discretionary Review. Petitioner has been

trying to obtain legal counsel for this matter.

Wherefore, petitioner prays this court grant this motion and

extend the deadline for filing the petition for Discretionary

review in case Nol;03-1 4-001 7g:RCRto 1 4th day of DECEMBER .

sigqnature // >

Orfa/? 'Tfca/tf

print name '

petitioner pro se

T.D.C.3. # /<7/<?/22_

Texas Department of

Criminal Justice

Bill Clements Unit

9601 spur 591

Amarillo Texas 79107-9606

r

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing

first motion for extention of time to file petition for Discretionary

Review has been forewarded by U.S. mail,postage prepaid, first

class to the state prosecutor, P.O..Box 13046 Austin Texas, 7B711.

On this ;.>;./ ifffl Day of OC^jfr
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT ON CONSOLIDATED INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS AND THE STATEMENT
OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL CONDITION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           OCT-31-1999 <F1>
<PERIOD END>                                JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                            9,800
<SECURITIES>                                    104,800
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1,433,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (11,100)
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0
<PP&E>                                           15,224
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (9,571)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                2,140,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 0
<BONDS>                                       1,470,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        171,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      112,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  2,140,900
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 79,200
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    22,100 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  9,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  1,300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               22,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  23,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (9,200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              14,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     14,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
<FN>
<F1>  THE CORPORATION'S STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION IS UNCLASSIFIED;
THEREFORE, THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN CURRENT AND LONG-TERM ASSETS AND
LIABILITIES IS NOT AVAILABLE.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
# C_2007100EN.01000201.xml

| 4.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4586 — Nutrilux/Provimi)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 100/03)

On 21 March 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4586. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4586. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS OF
PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND THE RELATED CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME AND CHANGES IN TRUST CORPUS FOR THE 12 MONTH
PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,724,192
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,724,192
<PP&E>                                      10,975,216
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,478,622
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,220,786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,724,192
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,496,594
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,220,786
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,641,538
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               451,423
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             22,190,115
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         22,190,115
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                22,190,115
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 210 (Tuesday, November 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65933-65934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21676]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WO-310-06-1310-GEOT]


Implementation of the Geothermal Sections of the Energy Policy 
Act of 2005; Public Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A public meeting is being held by the Bureau of Land 
Management and the U.S. Forest Service to solicit suggestions from the 
public and industry on how to best implement the geothermal provisions 
of the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

DATES: The meeting date is scheduled as follows: November 17, 2005; 1-4 
p.m., local time.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the following location: Reno 
Hilton Hotel, 2500 East 2nd Street, Reno, Nevada 89595.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Bebout, National Geothermal 
Program Lead for the BLM at (202) 557-3375 or Bob Fujimoto, Geothermal 
Lead for the U.S. Forest Service at (503) 808-2430.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will begin with an overview of 
the geothermal provisions of the Energy Policy Act. Participants who 
request to speak will be given a set amount of time to provide 
suggestions that address

[[Page 65934]]

implementation as well as major areas of interest/concern with the 
geothermal sections of the Act.

    Dated: October 26, 2005.
Thomas P. Lonnie,
Assistant Director, Minerals, Realty and Resource Protection.
[FR Doc. 05-21676 Filed 10-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-P