alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, William T. Freeman, Chief Executive Officer, in connection with the Report on Form 10-Q of McCormick & Schmicks Seafood Restaurants, Inc. for the quarterly period ended
March 30, 2011 (the Report), hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of McCormick & Schmicks Seafood
Restaurants, Inc.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ WILLIAM T. FREEMAN 
|William T. Freeman     
|Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 6, 2011
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5360 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify the standard of visual 

acuity required for eligibility for specially adapted housing assistance 

provided by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2010 

Ms. HERSETH SANDLIN (for herself and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify the standard of visual acuity required for eligibility for specially 

adapted housing assistance provided by the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Blinded Veterans 

5 Adaptive Housing Improvement Act of 2010’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5360 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF STANDARD OF VISUAL ACUITY 

2 REQUIRED FOR ELIGIBILITY FOR SPECIALLY 

3 ADAPTED HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROVIDED 

4 BY THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2101(b)(2)(A) of title 38, 

6 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘5/200 visual 

7 acuity or less’’ and inserting ‘‘20/200 best corrected visual 

8 acuity or less or a peripheral field of 20 degrees or less’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to specially adapted 

11 housing assistance provided on or after the date of the 

12 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
#### NICHOLAS M. CARUSO, Appellant, v. NEVADA EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT, STATE OF NEVADA, STANLEY P. JONES, in his capacity as Executive Director of the NEVADA EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT, and XEBEC, Respondents.

No. 16809

March 24, 1987

734 P.2d 224

*Sharon E. Claassen,*Carson City, for Appellant.

*Crowell, Crowell, Crowell & Susich,*Carson City, for Respondents.

OPINION

*Per Curiam:**1*

This is an appeal from an order of the district court granting respondents’ motion to dismiss appellant’s petition for judicial review for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. NRS 612.530(1).

Appellant filed an unsuccessful claim for unemployment compensation benefits in Carson City, Nevada. The decision of the Employment Security Board of Review advised appellant that he *76could secure judicial review of the board’s adverse decision “by filing an appeal to the district court serving the county in which the claim was filed,” consistent with the provisions of NRS 612.530(1). Appellant did not follow the board’s instructions and, instead, filed a petition for judicial review in the Ninth Judicial District Court, Douglas County, Nevada. Subsequently, the district court granted respondent’s motion to dismiss based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Appellant contends that the provisions of NRS 612.530(1) are not jurisdictional based on our holding in Scott v. Nev. Employ. Sec., 70 Nev. 555, 278 P.2d 602 (1954). More specifically, appellant contends that our decision in *Scott*contemplates that claimants be able to pursue judicial review of decisions of the Employment Security Board of Review in the county of their residence. This contention is without merit. In *Scott,*we noted that “where a statute upon a particular subject has provided a tribunal for the determination of questions connected with the subject ... the jurisdiction thus conferred *is exclusive,*unless otherwise expressed or clearly manifested. ...” 70 Nev. at 559, 278 P.2d at 603-604 (quoting Minnesota Valley Canning Company v. Rehnblom, 49 N.W.2d 553, 555 (Iowa 1951)) (emphasis added). The legislature has, by explicit language, directed claimants to file their petitions for judicial review in the county wherein the appealed claim was filed. While this legislative mandate may occasionally result in hardship, it is not the function of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the legislature. *See*Klosterman v. Cummings, 86 Nev. 684, 687, 476 P.2d 14, 16 (1970). The Ninth Judicial District Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over appellant’s petition for judicial review and, accordingly, properly dismissed the case below.

We have considered appellant’s remaining contentions, and we conclude that they lack merit. We affirm the order of the district court.

1

This appeal was previously dismissed on the merits in an unpublished order of this court. On motion of respondents, we have determined that our decision should be issued in a published opinion. Accordingly, we hereby issue this opinion in place of our order dismissing appeal filed December 30, 1986.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 60494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20879]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, November 18, 2005.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to Be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, (202) 418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-20879 Filed 10-14-05; 9:44 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

A.D., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, AUBURN PARK POST 

OFFICE, Chicago, IL, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0132

Issued: May 12, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

On November 2, 2020 appellant filed a timely appeal from an April 23, 2020 merit decision 

of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards 

assigned the appeal Docket No. 21-0132.

The Board, having duly considered the matter, concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 

21-0132 must be dismissed. The Board’s jurisdiction is limited to the review of final adverse 

OWCP decisions issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act (FECA).1 The case 

record as transmitted to the Board does not contain a final adverse decision of OWCP issued within 

180 days from the date of docketing of the current appeal.2 

The 180th day following the April 23, 2020 OWCP decision, which granted appellant a 

schedule award for seven percent permanent impairment of the left upper extremity in a claim 

 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2

Id. at § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the date of 

issuance of a decision of OWCP.”
2

assigned OWCP File No. xxxxxx225, was October 20, 2020.

3

 As appellant did not file an appeal

with the Board until November 2, 2020, more than 180 days after the April 23, 2020 schedule 

award decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 21-0132 is untimely filed. The 

Board is, therefore, without jurisdiction to review the appeal of the April 23, 2020 decision. 

Appellant has not offered a reason to explain her failure to timely file an appeal with supporting 

documentation sufficient to establish compelling circumstances. 

For the foregoing reasons, the Board finds that there is no final adverse OWCP decision 

over which the Board may properly exercise jurisdiction, the Board concludes that the appeal 

docketed as No. 21-0132 must be dismissed.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0132 is dismissed.

Issued: May 12, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

 

3 On April 16, 2020 OWCP administratively combined OWCP File Nos. xxxxxx061 and xxxxxx225 with the latter 

designated as the master file.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5166 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the loss 

of United States citizenship by individuals who are unprivileged enemy 

belligerents. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2010 

Mr. DENT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide 

for the loss of United States citizenship by individuals 

who are unprivileged enemy belligerents. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Revoking Citizenship 

5 for Terrorists Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LOSS OF NATIONALITY BY UNPRIVILEGED ENEMY 

7 BELLIGERENTS. 

8 Section 349(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

9 Act (8 U.S.C. 1481(a)) is amended— 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5166 IH

1 (1) in paragraphs (1) through (6), by striking 

2 ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

3 (2) in paragraph (7), by striking the period at 

4 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(8) being an unprivileged enemy belligerent 

7 (as such term is defined in section 948a(7) of title 

8 10, United States Code).’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule15d-14(b) and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Reportof Permian Basin Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2022 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Trust. 

 
  
ARGENT TRUST COMPANY,

TRUSTEE FOR THE

PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
Date: March 1, 2023  By: /s/ Ron E. Hooper   Ron E. Hooper,   SVP Royalty Trust Services
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Permian Basin RoyaltyTrust and will be retained by the Permian Basin Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**
/s/ Justice Lee Gabriel 

## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-19-00340

- CR JALEEL FRANKLIN, Appellant 

### § On Appeal from the 432nd District Court 

### § of Tarrant Coun ty ( 1368033D) V. 

### § November 14, 20 19 

### § Opinion by Ju stice Gabriel THE STATE OF TEXAS 

### § (nfp) 

### JUDGMENT This court ha s considered the record on appeal in this case and h olds that th e appeal should be dismissed. It is or dered that the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction
. SECOND DISTRICT COU RT OF APPEALS 

### By ______________

**~** Ju s tice Lee Gabriel
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer**

**andChief Financial Officer Pursuant to**

**18U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Mrs. Fields Famous Brands, LLC. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended October 2, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Stephen Russo, as ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and Sandra M. Buffa, as Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Stephen Russo       |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Stephen Russo           |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| November 16, 2004       |
|                    |
|                    |
| /s/ Sandra M. Buffa     |   |
| Sandra M. Buffa         |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| November 16, 2004       |

 

 

This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of thisstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 29, 2020

No. 04-20-00474-CV

Raymond MONTES,

Appellant

v.

Rudolfo Buentello MONTES,

Appellee

From the 454th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-03-25678-CV

The Honorable Daniel J. Kindred, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s brief was due by December 28, 2020. On that day, appellee filed a motion 

requesting a forty-five day extension of time to file his brief. After consideration, we GRANT

appellee’s motion and ORDER appellee to file his brief by February 11, 2021.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of December, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 208 (Friday, October 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 62129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21505]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1607-DR]


Louisiana; Amendment No. 9 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1607-DR), dated September 24, 2005, 
and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 17, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following 
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 24, 2005:

    Lafayette Parish for Public Assistance [Categories C-G] (already 
designated for Individual Assistance and debris removal and 
emergency protective measures [Categories A and B] under the Public 
Assistance program, including direct Federal assistance.)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison,
Acting Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department 
of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 05-21505 Filed 10-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.4


                           [DEVON ENERGY LETTERHEAD]



                                  NEWS RELEASE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Investor contact: Zack Hager
                  (405) 552-4526

Media contact:    Brian Engel
                  (405) 228-7750

                 DEVON ENERGY ISSUES $1 BILLION OF 30-YEAR NOTES
                            TO REPLACE EXISTING DEBT

         OKLAHOMA CITY, (March 25, 2002) -- Devon Energy Corp. (AMEX: DVN, TSE:
NSX) today announced that it has issued $1 billion of 30-year notes. The 7.950
percent notes are due April 15, 2032.

          "We are very pleased to have issued these 30-year notes under such
attractive terms," said J. Larry Nichols, Devon's chairman, president and chief
executive officer. "By replacing shorter-term debt, we have significantly
extended our principal amortization schedule. We plan to defer principal
amortization even further by applying another $1 billion or so from the sales of
our non-core properties to debt repayment."

         The notes were priced at 220 basis points above Treasuries to yield
7.995 percent. Devon will receive net proceeds of approximately $986 million
after underwriting fees and expenses. Proceeds of the notes will be used to
repay debt Devon currently has outstanding under a five-year term loan and
commercial paper borrowings. Devon incurred a $3 billion five-year term loan to
fund portions of its recent acquisitions of Anderson Exploration Ltd. and
Mitchell Energy & Development Corp.

            This press release includes "forward-looking statements" as defined
by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such statements are those concerning
the contemplated transactions and strategic plans, expectations and objectives
for future operations. All statements, other than statements of historical
facts, included in this press release that address activities, events or
developments that the company expects, believes or anticipates will or may occur
in the future are forward-looking statements. These statements are based on
certain assumptions made by the company based on its experience and perception
of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other
factors it believes are appropriate in the circumstances. Such statements are
subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties, many of which are
beyond the control of the company. Investors are cautioned that any such
statements are not guarantees of future performance and that actual results or
developments may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking
statements.

         Devon Energy Corporation is an Oklahoma City-based independent energy
company engaged in oil and gas exploration, production and property
acquisitions. Devon ranks among the top five U.S.-based independent oil and gas
producers and is included in the S&P 500 Index.

                                       ###
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Timberline Resources Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig Crowell, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 10, 2010

| | By:   /s/ Craig Crowell
_____________________________
Craig Crowell
Chief Accounting Officer
Principal Accounting Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       3,328,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,022,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,350,000
<PP&E>                                     220,332,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,209,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             235,676,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,918,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       53,079,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       922,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,841,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               235,676,000
<SALES>                                     10,805,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,805,000
<CGS>                                        6,784,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,784,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             925,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,122,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,187,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,935,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,051,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (532,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>