UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC  20549



Form 10-KSB



[X]

ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006



[ ]

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



For the transition period _________to _________



Commission file number 0-10256



SHELTER PROPERTIES II

(Name of small business issuer in its charter)



|                                |                     
|------------------------------- | --------------------
|South Carolina                  | 57-0709233          
|(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer    
|incorporation or organization)  | (Identification No.)



55 Beattie Place, P.O. Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Address of principal executive offices)



(864) 239-1000

Issuer's telephone number



Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:



None



Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:



Units of Limited Partnership Interest

(Title of class)



Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YesX No___



Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB.  [X]



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes [ ]  No[X]



State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year.  $6,569,000



State the aggregate market value of the voting partnership interests held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the partnership interests were sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such partnership interests, as of December 31, 2006.  No market exists for the limited partnership interests of the Registrant, and, therefore, no aggregate market value can be determined.





DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None





The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance and the effect of government regulations. Actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a variety of risks and factors including, without limitation: national and local economic conditions; the terms of governmental regulations that affect the Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment in which the Registrant operates; financing risks, including the risk that cash flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and the general economic climate in local markets and competition for tenants in such markets; litigation, including costs associated with prosecuting and defending claims and any adverse outcomes and possible environmental liabilities. Readers should carefully review the Registrant's financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the risk factors described in the documents the Registrant files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



PART I



Item 1.

Description of Business



Shelter Properties II (the "Registrant" or the "Partnership") was organized as a limited partnership under the laws of the State of South Carolina on October 10, 1980.  The general partner responsible for management of the Partnership's business is Shelter Realty II Corporation, a South Carolina corporation (the "Corporate General Partner"). The Corporate General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. The other general partner is AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner and AIMCO. The Partnership Agreement provides that the Partnership is to terminate on December 31, 2020 unless terminated prior to such date.



Commencing February 2, 1981, the Partnership offered, pursuant to a Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, up to 27,400 Units of Limited Partnership Interest (the "Units") at a purchase price of $1,000 per Unit with a minimum purchase of 5 Units ($5,000), or 1.5 Units ($1,500) for an Individual Retirement Account. An additional 100 Units were purchased by the Corporate General Partner. Since its offering, the Partnership has not received, nor are limited partners required to make, additional capital contributions.



The offering terminated on April 30, 1981. Upon termination of the offering, the Partnership had accepted subscriptions for 27,500 Units, including 100 Units purchased by the Corporate General Partner, for an aggregate of $27,500,000.  The Partnership is engaged in the business of operating and holding real estate properties for investment. The Partnership invested approximately $21,000,000 of such proceeds in five existing apartment properties. The Partnership continues to own and operate two of these properties.  See "Item 2. Description of Properties".



The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Corporate General Partner and its affiliates for property management services and administration of all partnership activities. The Partnership Agreement provides for certain payments to affiliates for services and as reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.











Risk Factors



The real estate business in which the Partnership is engaged is highly competitive. There are other residential properties within the market area of the Partnership's properties. The number and quality of competitive properties, including those which may be managed by an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner, in such market area could have a material effect on the rental market for the apartments at the Partnership's properties and the rents that may be charged for such apartments. While the Corporate General Partner and its affiliates own and/or control a significant number of apartment units in the United States, such units represent an insignificant percentage of total apartment units in the United States and competition for the apartments is local.



Laws benefiting disabled persons may result in the Partnership's incurrence of unanticipated expenses. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA, all places intended to be used by the public are required to meet certain Federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Likewise, the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, or FHAA, requires apartment properties first occupied after March 13, 1990 to be accessible to the handicapped.  These and other Federal, state and local laws may require modifications to the Partnership's properties, or restrict renovations of the properties.  Noncompliance with these laws could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants and also could result in an order to correct any non-complying feature, which could result in substantial capital expenditures. Although the Corporate General Partner believes that the Partnership's properties are substantially in compliance with the present requirements, the Partnership may incur unanticipated expenses to comply with the ADA and the FHAA.



Both the income and expenses of operating the properties owned by the Partnership are subject to factors outside of the Partnership's control, such as changes in the supply and demand for similar properties resulting from various market conditions, increases/decreases in unemployment or population shifts, changes in the availability of permanent mortgage financing, changes in zoning laws, or changes in patterns or needs of users.  In addition, there are risks inherent in owning and operating residential properties because such properties are susceptible to the impact of economic and other conditions outside of the control of the Partnership.



From time to time, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, or FBI, and the United States Department of Homeland Security issue alerts regarding potential terrorist threats involving apartment buildings. Threats of future terrorist attacks, such as those announced by the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security, could have a negative effect on rent and occupancy levels at the Partnerships properties. The effect that future terrorist activities or threats of such activities could have on the Partnerships operations is uncertain and unpredictable. If the Partnership were to incur a loss at a property as a result of an act of terrorism, the Partnership could lose all or a portion of the capital invested in the property, as well as the future revenue from the property.



There have been, and it is possible there may be other, Federal, state and local legislation and regulations enacted relating to the protection of the environment. The Partnership is unable to predict the extent, if any, to which such new legislation or regulations might occur and the degree to which such existing or new legislation or regulations might adversely affect the properties owned by the Partnership.



The Partnership monitors its properties for evidence of pollutants, toxins and other dangerous substances, including the presence of asbestos.  In certain cases environmental testing has been performed which resulted in no material adverse conditions or liabilities.  In no case has the Partnership received notice that it is a potentially responsible party with respect to an environmental clean up site.













A further description of the Partnership's business is included in "Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation" included in "Item 6" of this Form 10-KSB.



Item 2.

Description of Properties



The following table sets forth the Partnership's investments in properties:



|                         |          |                           |          
|------------------------ | -------- | ------------------------- | ---------
|                         | Date of  |                           |          
|Properties               | Purchase | Type of Ownership         | Use      
|                         |          |                           |          
|Parktown Townhouses      | 03/01/81 | Fee ownership, subject to | Apartment
|Deer Park, Texas         |          | first mortgage            | 309 units
|                         |          |                           |          
|Signal Pointe Apartments | 06/30/81 | Fee ownership, subject to | Apartment
|Winter Park, Florida     |          | first mortgage            | 368 units



Schedule of Properties



Set forth below for both of the Partnership's properties is the gross carrying value, accumulated depreciation, depreciable life, method of depreciation, and Federal tax basis.



|              |                |              |             |                |          
|------------- | -------------- | ------------ | ----------- | -------------- | ---------
|              | Gross          |              |             | Method         |          
|              | Carrying       | Accumulated  | Depreciable | Of             | Federal  
|Properties    | Value          | Depreciation | Life        | Depreciation   | Tax Basis
|              | (in thousands) |              |             | (in thousands)
|Parktown      |                |              |             |                |          
|Townhouses    | $16,409        | $ 8,820      | 5-35 yrs    | S/L            | $5,033   
|Signal Pointe |                |              |             |                |          
|Apartments    | 15,798         | 11,276       | 5-37 yrs    | S/L            | 3,433    
|Totals        | $32,207        | $20,096      |             |                | $8,466   



See "Note A  Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" to the financial statements included in "Item 7. Financial Statements" for a description of the Partnership's depreciation and capitalization policies.













Schedule of Property Indebtedness



The following table sets forth certain information relating to the loans encumbering the Partnership's properties.



|              |                |          |           |          |          
|------------- | -------------- | -------- | --------- | -------- | ---------
|              | Principal      |          |           |          | Principal
|              | Balance At     | Stated   |           |          | Balance  
|              | December 31,   | Interest | Period    | Maturity | Due at   
|Property      | 2006           | Rate (1) | Amortized | Date     | Maturity 
|              | (in thousands) |          |           |          |          
|Parktown      |                |          |           |          |          
|Townhouses    | $ 6,513        | 7.21%    | 20 yrs    | 01/01/21 | $   --   
|              |                |          |           |          |          
|Signal Pointe |                |          |           |          |          
|Apartments    | 7,411          | 7.22%    | 20 yrs    | 01/01/21 | --       
|              |                |          |           |          |          
|Total         | $13,924        |          |           |          | $--      



(1)

Fixed rate mortgages.



(2)

See Note B  Mortgage Notes Payable to the financial statements included in Item 7. Financial Statements for information with respect to the Partnerships ability to repay these loans and other specific details about these loans.



Rental Rates and Occupancy



Average annual rental rates per unit and occupancy for 2006 and 2005 for each property:



|                             |                |           |      |     
|---------------------------- | -------------- | --------- | ---- | ----
|                             | Average Annual | Average  
|                             | Rental Rates   | Occupancy
|                             | (per unit)     |           |     
|                             |                |           |     
|Properties                   | 2006           | 2005      | 2006 | 2005
|                             |                |           |      |     
|Parktown Townhouses (1)      | $ 9,512        | $ 8,978   | 93%  | 90% 
|Signal Pointe Apartments (2) | 9,365          | 8,261     | 93%  | 97% 



(1)

The Corporate General Partner attributes the increase in average occupancy at Parktown Townhouses to an improved customer service and competitive pricing.



(2)

The Corporate General Partner attributes the decrease in average occupancy at Signal Pointe Apartments to increased competition.



As noted under "Item 1. Description of Business", the real estate industry is highly competitive. Both of the properties of the Partnership are subject to competition from other residential apartment complexes in the area.  The Corporate General Partner believes that each of the properties is adequately insured.  Each property is an apartment complex which leases units for lease terms of one year or less.  No residential tenant leases 10% or more of the available rental space.  Each of the properties is in good physical condition, subject to normal depreciation and deterioration as is typical for assets of this type and age.













Real Estate Taxes and Rates



Real estate taxes and rates in 2006 for each property were:



|                         |                |         
|------------------------ | -------------- | --------
|                         | 2006           | 2006    
|                         | Billing        | Rate (1)
|                         | (in thousands) |         
|                         |                |         
|Parktown Townhouses      | $255           | 3.17%   
|Signal Pointe Apartments | 216            | 1.55%   



(1)

The rates are based on the local authority's assessed value of the investment properties.



Capital Improvements



Parktown Townhouses



During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Partnership completed approximately $441,000 of capital improvements at Parktown Townhouses consisting primarily of roof replacement, building improvements, office computers, casualty repairs, structural upgrades, counter tops, and water heater, appliance, air conditioning unit, and floor covering replacements. These improvements were funded from operating cash flow, replacement reserves and insurance proceeds. The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property.  While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2007.  Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as the anticipated cash flow generated by the property.



Signal Pointe Apartments



During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Partnership completed approximately $1,025,000 of capital improvements at Signal Pointe Apartments consisting primarily of balcony enhancements, building improvements, balcony replacements, fencing, casualty repairs, vinyl siding, pool upgrades, laundry room improvements, exterior painting, and air conditioning unit, appliance, and floor covering replacements. These improvements were funded from operating cash flow and insurance proceeds.  The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property.  While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2007. Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as the anticipated cash flow generated by the property.



Capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from operations or from Partnership reserves.  To the extent that capital improvements are completed, the Partnership's distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.



Item 3.

Legal Proceedings



In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the Partnership commenced an action entitled Rosalie Nuanes, et al. v. Insignia Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Mateo. The plaintiffs named as defendants, among others, the Partnership, its Corporate General Partner and several of their affiliated partnerships and corporate entities. The action purported to assert claims on behalf of a class of limited partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) that are named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of interests in certain Corporate General Partner entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities that were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia; past tender offers by the Insignia affiliates to acquire limited partnership units; management of the partnerships by the Insignia affiliates; and the series of transactions which closed on October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby Insignia and Insignia Properties Trust, respectively, were merged into AIMCO. The plaintiffs sought monetary damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership. In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint captioned Heller v. Insignia Financial Group (the "Heller action") was filed against the same defendants that are named in the Nuanes action. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint. The Heller action was brought as a purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty, unfair competition, conversion, unjust enrichment, and judicial dissolution. On January 28, 2002, the trial court granted defendants motion to strike the complaint.  Plaintiffs took an appeal from this order.



On January 8, 2003, the parties filed a Stipulation of Settlement in proposed settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action. On June 13, 2003, the court granted final approval of the settlement and entered judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions. On August 12, 2003, an objector ("Objector") filed an appeal (the Appeal) seeking to vacate and/or reverse the order approving the settlement and entering judgment thereto. On May 4, 2004, the Objector filed a second appeal challenging the courts use of a referee and its order requiring Objector to pay those fees.



On March 21, 2005, the Court of Appeals issued opinions in both pending appeals.  With regard to the settlement and judgment entered thereto, the Court of Appeals vacated the trial courts order and remanded to the trial court for further findings on the basis that the state of the record is insufficient to permit meaningful appellate review.  The matter was transferred back to the trial court on June 21, 2005.  With regard to the second appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed the order requiring the Objector to pay referee fees. With respect to the related Heller appeal, on July 28, 2005, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial courts order striking the first amended complaint.



On August 18, 2005, Objector and his counsel filed a motion to disqualify the trial court based on a peremptory challenge and filed a motion to disqualify for cause on October 17, 2005, both of which were ultimately denied and/or struck by the trial court.  On or about October 13, 2005 Objector filed a motion to intervene and on or about October 19, 2005 filed both a motion to take discovery relating to the adequacy of plaintiffs as derivative representatives and a motion to dissolve the anti-suit injunction in connection with settlement.  On November 14, 2005, Plaintiffs filed a Motion For Further Findings pursuant to the remand ordered by the Court of Appeals. Defendants joined in that motion.  On February 3, 2006, the Court held a hearing on the various matters pending before it and ordered additional briefing from the parties and Objector. On June 30, 2006, the trial court entered an order confirming its approval of the class action settlement and entering judgment thereto after the Court of Appeals had remanded the matter for further findings.  The substantive terms of the settlement agreement remain unchanged.  The trial court also entered supplemental orders on July 1, 2006, denying Objectors Motion to File a Complaint in Intervention, Objectors Motion for Leave of Discovery and Objectors Motion to Dissolve the Anti-Suit Injunction.  Notice of Entry of Judgment was served on July 10, 2006.  On August 31, 2006, the Objector filed a Notice of Appeal to the Courts June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2006 orders. On December 14, 2006, Objector filed his Appellants Brief.  The Partnership and its affiliates, as well as counsel of the Settlement Class, have not yet filed their briefs in response.













The Corporate General Partner does not anticipate that any costs to the Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will be material to the Partnerships overall operations.



AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP Management Company, both affiliates of the CorporateGeneral Partner, are defendants in a lawsuit alleging that they willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by failing to pay maintenance workers overtime for all hours worked in excess of forty per week. The complaint, filed in the United   States District Court for the District of Columbia, attempts to bring a collective action under the FLSA and seeks to certify state subclasses in California, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to compensate maintenance workers for time that they were required to be "on-call." Additionally, the complaint alleges AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to comply with the FLSA in compensating maintenance workers for time that they worked in excess of 40 hours in a week.   In June 2005 the court conditionally certified the collective action on both the on-call and overtime issues.  Approximately 1,049 individuals opted in to the class. The defendants moved to decertify the collective action on both issues and that issue is now fully briefed. The defendants anticipate that the Court will soon set oral argument on the defendants decertification motion.  Because the court denied plaintiffs motion to certify state subclasses, in September 2005, the plaintiffs filed a class action with the same allegations in the Superior Court of California (Contra Costa County), and in November 2005 in Montgomery County Maryland Circuit Court.  The California and Maryland cases have been stayed pending the outcome of the decertification motion in the District of Columbia case.  Although the outcome of any litigation is uncertain, AIMCO Properties, L.P. does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Similarly, the Corporate General Partner does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on the Partnerships financial condition or results of operations.



The Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding litigation matters involving it or its investment properties that are not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.



Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders



During the quarter ended December 31, 2006, no matter was submitted to a vote of Unit holders through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.











PART II



Item 5.

Market for the Partnership Equity and Related Partner Matters



The Partnership, a publicly-held limited partnership, offered and sold 27,400 limited partnership units (the Units) aggregating $27,400,000. An additional 100 Units were purchased by the Corporate General Partner. The Partnership had 669 holders of record owning an aggregate of 27,500 Units at December 31, 2006.  Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner owned 21,232.50 Units or 77.21% at December 31, 2006. No public trading market has developed for the Units, and it is not anticipated that such a market will develop in the future.



No distributions were made by the Partnership during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.  Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of net cash generated from operations and the timing of property sales, and/or refinancings. The Partnership's cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. In light of the amounts accrued and payable to affiliates of the Corporate General Partner at December 31, 2006, there can be no assurance, that the Partnership will generate sufficient funds from operations after planned capital expenditures to permit any distributions to its partners in 2007 or subsequent periods. See "Item 2. Description of Properties - Capital Improvements" for information relating to anticipated capital expenditures at the properties.



In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interest in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 21,232.50 Units in the Partnership representing 77.21% of the outstanding Units at December 31, 2006. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the Corporate General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 77.21% of the outstanding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all such voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the Corporate General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the Corporate General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the Corporate General Partner, as corporate general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Corporate General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.



Item 6.

Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation



This item should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and other items contained elsewhere in this report.



The Partnerships financial results depend upon a number of factors including the ability to attract and maintain tenants at the investment properties, interest rates on mortgage loans, costs incurred to operate the investment properties, general economic conditions and weather. As part of the ongoing business plan of the Partnership, the Corporate General Partner monitors the rental market environment of its investment properties to assess the feasibility of increasing rents, maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the Corporate General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from the burden of inflation-related increases in expenses by increasing rents and maintaining a high overall occupancy level. However, the Corporate General Partner may use rental concessions and rental rate reductions to offset softening market conditions; accordingly, there is no guarantee that the Corporate General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan. Further, a number of factors that are outside the control of the Partnership, such as the local economic climate and weather, can adversely or positively affect the Partnerships financial results.



Results of Operations



The Partnerships net income for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 and was approximately $800,000 and $724,000, respectively.  The increase in net income is due to an increase in total revenues partially offset by an increase in total expenses.  Total revenues increased due to an increase in rental income and other income partially offset by a decrease in casualty gains.  Rental income increased due to an increase in occupancy at Parktown Townhouses and an increase in the average rental rate at both investment properties partially offset by a decrease in occupancy at Signal Point Apartments.  Other income increased due to increases in utility reimbursements and cleaning and damage fees at both investment properties.



During November 2005, one of the Partnerships investment properties, Signal Pointe Apartments, incurred approximately $46,000 in damages from a fire.  During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $39,000 and wrote off undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $8,000 resulting in a casualty gain of approximately $31,000.



During February 2005, one of the Partnerships investment properties, Parktown Townhouses, incurred damages from a fire. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $192,000, estimated total building damages at approximately $309,000, wrote off undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $267,000 and did not recognize a loss related to this event as additional insurance proceeds were expected to be received during 2006. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Partnership received additional insurance proceeds of approximately $66,000 for building damages and approximately $51,000 for emergency repairs and clean up costs incurred and charged to operating expenses during the year ended December 31, 2005. The Partnership changed its casualty calculation estimate upon completion of improvements and recorded a casualty gain in the amount of approximately $36,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 as a result of the write off of undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $223,000. This change in estimate resulted in an increase of approximately $48,000 of net property improvements and replacements for the year ended December 31, 2006. The receipt of the $51,000 for emergency repairs and clean up costs was reflected as a reduction to operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006.



During August and September 2004, one of the Partnerships investment properties, Signal Pointe Apartments, incurred damages from Hurricanes Charlie, Frances and Jeanne.  In 2004, the property estimated damages to the building from all three hurricanes of approximately $441,000.  The Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $131,000 and wrote off damaged assets of approximately $36,000, which resulted in the recognition of a casualty gain of approximately $95,000 during 2004.  During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Partnership revised the estimated damages to the building to approximately $773,000.  During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Partnership received additional insurance proceeds of approximately $126,000 and wrote off additional net assets of approximately $52,000 that resulted in a casualty gain of approximately $74,000.



In addition to building damages, the Partnership estimated clean up costs from the three hurricanes of approximately $312,000, which were not covered by insurance proceeds.  These costs were accrued at December 31, 2004.  During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Partnership obtained additional details on the costs to be incurred and revised the estimates for clean up costs to approximately $45,000.  As a result, the Partnership reduced the accrual for these costs by approximately $267,000, which is included in operating expenses.













During October 2004, one of the Partnerships investment properties, Signal Pointe Apartments, incurred damage from a fire.  During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $44,000 and wrote off undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $10,000 resulting in a casualty gain of approximately $34,000.



Total expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2006 due to an increase in operating and depreciation expenses partially offset by decreases in interest and property tax expenses.  Operating expenses increased due to increases in advertising, administrative, insurance and maintenance expenses, and an adjustment of the accrual for hurricane clean up costs during the year ended December 31, 2005 (see above) partially offset by receipt of proceeds for emergency repairs and clean up costs at Parktown Townhouses (see above).  Advertising expense increased due to an increase in web advertising at both investment properties partially offset by a decrease in periodicals at Signal Pointe Apartments and a decrease in referral fees at Parktown Townhouses.  Administrative expenses increased due to increases in tenant application processing and employee training expenses at both investment properties and due to an increase in ad valorem tax service at Parktown Townhouses.  Insurance expense increased due to an increase in the hazard and other insurance premiums at both investment properties.  Maintenance expense increased due to an increase in contract labor and services at Signal Point Apartments.  Depreciation expense increased due to assets placed in service at both investment properties over the past twelve months partially offset by assets becoming fully depreciated at Parktown Townhouses. Interest expense decreased due to decreases in interest expense on the mortgages encumbering the Partnerships investment properties due to the payment of scheduled principal payments, which reduced the carrying balance of the mortgages, a decrease in interest on advances from an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner, and an increase in the interest costs capitalized at Parktown Townhomes as a result of down units for foundation work. Property tax expense decreased due to a refund received at Parktown Townhouses and to a decrease in the assessed value of Parktown Townhouses partially offset by an increase in the assessed value of Signal Point Apartments.



Included in general and administrative expense for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 are management reimbursements to the Corporate General Partner as allowed under the Partnership Agreement, costs associated with the quarterly and annual communications with investors and regulatory agencies and the annual audit required by the Partnership Agreement.



Liquidity and Capital Resources



At December 31, 2006, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $218,000 compared to approximately $353,000 at December 31, 2005.  Cash and cash equivalents decreased approximately $135,000 due to approximately $1,148,000 and $929,000 of cash used in investing and financing activities, respectively, partially offset by approximately $1,942,000 of cash provided by operating activities.  Cash used in investing activities consisted of property improvements and replacements slightly offset by net withdrawals from restricted escrows and insurance proceeds received.  Cash used in financing activities consisted of repayment of advances from an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner and payments of principal on the mortgages encumbering the Partnerships investment properties partially offset by advances from an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner. The Partnership invests its working capital in interest bearing accounts.



The sufficiency of existing liquid assets to meet future liquidity and capital expenditure requirements is directly related to the level of capital expenditures required at the properties to adequately maintain the physical assets and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal, state and local legal and regulatory requirements. The Corporate General Partner monitors developments in the area of legal and regulatory compliance. For example, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests additional compliance measures with regard to governance, disclosure, audit and other areas. In light of these changes, the Partnership expects that it will incur higher expenses related to compliance. The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the properties.  While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2007.  Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the properties as well as insurance proceeds, replacement reserves and anticipated cash flow generated by the properties.  Capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from operations or from Partnership reserves.  To the extent that capital improvements are completed, the Partnership's distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.



The Partnership's assets are thought to be generally sufficient for any near term needs (exclusive of capital improvements) of the Partnership. The mortgage indebtedness encumbering the Partnership's investment properties of approximately $13,924,000 is amortized over 240 months with maturity dates of January 1, 2021, at which time the loans are scheduled to be fully amortized.



No distributions were made by the Partnership during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of net cash generated from operations and the timing of property sales, and/or refinancings. The Partnership's cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. In light of the amounts accrued and payable to affiliates of the Corporate General Partner at December 31, 2006, there can be no assurance, however, that the Partnership will generate sufficient funds from operations after planned capital expenditures to permit any distributions to its partners in 2007 or subsequent periods.



In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interest in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 21,232.50 limited partnership units (the Units) in the Partnership representing 77.21% of the outstanding Units at December 31, 2006. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the Corporate General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 77.21% of the outstanding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all such voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the Corporate General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the Corporate General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the Corporate General Partner, as corporate general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Corporate General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.



Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates



A summary of the Partnerships significant accounting policies is included in "Note A  Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" which is included in the financial statements in "Item 7. Financial Statements". The CorporateGeneral Partner believes that the consistent application of these policies enables the Partnership to provide readers of the financial statements with useful and reliable information about the Partnerships operating results and financial condition.  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from these estimates. Judgments and assessments of uncertainties are required in applying the Partnerships accounting policies in many areas. The Partnership believes that of its significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.



Impairment of Long-Lived Assets



Investment properties are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation, unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable.  If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a property may not be recoverable, the Partnership will make an assessment of its recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to the Partnerships estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the property.   If the carrying amount exceeds the aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, the Partnership would recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the property.



Real property investment is subject to varying degrees of risk.  Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance and value of the Partnerships investment properties.  These factors include, but are not limited to, general economic climate; competition from other apartment communities and other housing options; local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an increase in the supply of apartments that might adversely affect apartment occupancy or rental rates; changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of compliance; increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by increased rents; and changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of rent control laws or other laws regulating multi-family housing.  Any adverse changes in these factors could cause impairment of the Partnerships assets.



Capitalized Costs Related to Redevelopment & Construction Projects



The Partnership capitalizes costs incurred in connection with capital expenditure activities, including redevelopment and construction projects. Costs including interest, property taxes and operating costs associated with redevelopment and construction projects are capitalized during periods in which redevelopment and constructions projects are in progress in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 34 Capitalization of Interest Costs and SFAS No. 67, Accounting for Costs and the Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Properties. Included in these capitalized costs are payroll costs associated with time spent by site employees in connection with the planning, execution and control of all capital expenditure activities at the property level.



Revenue Recognition



The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.  The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or in response to heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area.  Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.  The Partnership evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.











Item 7.

Financial Statements



SHELTER PROPERTIES II



LIST OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



Balance Sheet - December 31, 2006



Statements of Operations - Years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005



Statements of Changes in Partners' Deficit - Years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005



Statements of Cash Flows - Years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005



Notes to Financial Statements











Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Partners

Shelter Properties II





We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Shelter Properties II as of December 31, 2006, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' deficit, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.



We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting.  Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Shelter Properties II at December 31, 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.





/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP





Greenville, South Carolina

March 22, 2007















|                                
|--------------------------------
|SHELTER PROPERTIES II           
|                                
|BALANCE SHEET                   
|(in thousands, except unit data)
|                                
|December 31, 2006               







|                                           |           |         
|------------------------------------------ | --------- | --------
|Assets                                     |           |         
|Cash and cash equivalents                  |           | $    218
|Receivables and deposits                   |           | 146     
|Restricted escrows                         |           | 26      
|Other assets                               |           | 487     
|Investment properties (Notes B, E, and F): |           |         
|Land                                       | $  1,630  |         
|Buildings and related personal property    | 30,577    |         
|                                           | 32,207    |         
|Less accumulated depreciation              | (20,096)  | 12,111  
|                                           |           | $12,988 
|                                           |           |         
|Liabilities and Partners' Deficit          |           |         
|Liabilities                                |           |         
|Accounts payable                           |           | $    276
|Tenant security deposits payable           |           | 120     
|Accrued property taxes                     |           | 256     
|Due to affiliates (Note D)                 |           | 360     
|Other liabilities                          |           | 305     
|Mortgage notes payable (Note B)            |           | 13,924  
|                                           |           |         
|Partners' Deficit                          |           |         
|General partners                           | $    (72) |         
|Limited partners (27,500 units issued and  |           |         
|outstanding)                               | (2,181)   | (2,253) 
|                                           |           | $12,988 



See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

















|                                    
|------------------------------------
|SHELTER PROPERTIES II               
|                                    
|STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS            
|(in thousands, except per unit data)







|                                               |                          |        
|---------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | -------
|                                               | Years Ended December 31,
|                                               | 2006                     | 2005   
|Revenues:                                      |                          |        
|Rental income                                  | $ 5,864                  | $ 5,362
|Other income                                   | 638                      | 548    
|Casualty gains (Note F)                        | 67                       | 108    
|Total revenues                                 | 6,569                    | 6,018  
|                                               |                          |        
|Expenses:                                      |                          |        
|Operating                                      | 3,039                    | 2,448  
|General and administrative                     | 186                      | 178    
|Depreciation                                   | 1,116                    | 1,104  
|Interest                                       | 1,026                    | 1,117  
|Property taxes                                 | 402                      | 447    
|Total expenses                                 | 5,769                    | 5,294  
|                                               |                          |        
|Net income (Note C)                            | $800                     | $724   
|                                               |                          |        
|Net income allocated to general partners (1%)  | $     8                  | $     7
|Net income allocated to limited partners (99%) | 792                      | 717    
|                                               | $800                     | $724   
|                                               |                          |        
|Net income per limited partnership unit        | $28.80                   | $26.07 



See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

















|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|SHELTER PROPERTIES II                     
|                                          
|STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT
|(in thousands, except unit data)          







|                               |             |          |          |         
|------------------------------ | ----------- | -------- | -------- | --------
|                               | Limited     |          |          |         
|                               | Partnership | General  | Limited  |         
|                               | Units       | Partners | Partners | Total   
|                               |             |          |          |         
|Original capital contributions | 27,500      | $2       | $27,500  | $27,502 
|                               |             |          |          |         
|Partners' deficit at           |             |          |          |         
|December 31, 2004              | 27,500      | $   (87) | $(3,690) | $(3,777)
|                               |             |          |          |         
|Net income for the year ended  |             |          |          |         
|December 31, 2005              | --          | 7        | 717      | 724     
|                               |             |          |          |         
|Partners' deficit at           |             |          |          |         
|December 31, 2005              | 27,500      | (80)     | (2,973)  | (3,053) 
|                               |             |          |          |         
|Net income for the year ended  |             |          |          |         
|December 31, 2006              | --          | 8        | 792      | 800     
|                               |             |          |          |         
|Partners' deficit at           |             |          |          |         
|December 31, 2006              | 27,500      | $(72)    | $(2,181) | $(2,253)



See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

















|                        
|------------------------
|SHELTER PROPERTIES II   
|                        
|STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|(in thousands)          





|                                                           |                          |        
|---------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | -------
|                                                           | Years Ended December 31,
|                                                           | 2006                     | 2005   
|Cash flows from operating activities:                      |                          |        
|Net income                                                 | $   800                  | $   724
|Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash            |                          |        
|provided by operating activities:                          |                          |        
|Depreciation                                               | 1,116                    | 1,104  
|Amortization of loan costs                                 | 24                       | 24     
|Casualty gains                                             | (67)                     | (108)  
|Change in accounts:                                        |                          |        
|Receivables and deposits                                   | (20)                     | 157    
|Other assets                                               | 12                       | 17     
|Accounts payable                                           | (39)                     | 100    
|Tenant security deposits payable                           | 1                        | --     
|Accrued property taxes                                     | (43)                     | 51     
|Due to affiliates                                          | 125                      | (4)    
|Other liabilities                                          | 33                       | (330)  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                  | 1,942                    | 1,735  
|                                                           |                          |        
|Cash flows from investing activities:                      |                          |        
|Property improvements and replacements                     | (1,262)                  | (1,513)
|Net withdrawals from restricted escrows                    | 9                        | 223    
|Insurance proceeds received                                | 105                      | 362    
|Net cash used in investing activities                      | (1,148)                  | (928)  
|                                                           |                          |        
|Cash flows from financing activities:                      |                          |        
|Payments on mortgage notes payable                         | (551)                    | (512)  
|Advances from affiliates                                   | 174                      | 308    
|Repayment of advances from affiliates                      | (552)                    | (344)  
|Net cash used in financing activities                      | (929)                    | (548)  
|                                                           |                          |        
|Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents       | (135)                    | 259    
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year             | 353                      | 94     
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of year                   | $218                     | $353   
|                                                           |                          |        
|Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:          |                          |        
|Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest        | $1,001                   | $1,098 
|                                                           |                          |        
|Supplemental disclosure of non-cash flow activity:         |                          |        
|Property improvements and replacements in accounts payable | $170                     | $14    
|Property improvements and replacements adjustment for      |                          |        
|casualty event (Note F)                                    | $48                      | $--    



See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

















|                             
|-----------------------------
|SHELTER PROPERTIES II        
|                             
|NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|                             
|December 31, 2006            





Note A - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies



Organization: Shelter Properties II (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") was organized as a limited partnership under the laws of the State of South Carolina on October 10, 1980. The general partner responsible for management of the Partnership's business is Shelter Realty II Corporation, a South Carolina corporation (the "Corporate General Partner"). The Corporate General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. The other general partner is AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner and AIMCO. The Partnership Agreement provides that the Partnership is to terminate on December 31, 2020 unless terminated prior to such date. The Partnership commenced operations on March 1, 1981, and completed its acquisition of apartment properties on June 30, 1981.  The Partnership operates two apartment properties located in Florida and Texas.



Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.



Allocation of Cash Distributions: Cash distributions by the Partnership are allocated between general and limited partners in accordance with the provisions of the Partnership Agreement.  The Partnership Agreement provides that net cash from operations means revenue received less operating expenses paid, adjusted for certain specified items which primarily include mortgage payments on debt, property improvements and replacements not previously reserved, and the effects of other adjustments to reserves including reserve amounts deemed necessary by the Corporate General Partner.  In the following notes to the financial statements, whenever "net cash provided by operations" is used, it has the aforementioned meaning. As required by the Partnership, the following is a reconciliation of "Net cash provided by operating activities" in the accompanying statements of cash flows to "Net cash from operations", as defined in the Partnership Agreement. However, "net cash from operations" should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indicator of the Partnership's operating performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity.



|                                                  |                          |        
|------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | -------
|                                                  | Years Ended December 31,
|                                                  | 2006                     | 2005   
|                                                  | (in thousands)          
|Net cash provided by operating activities         | $ 1,942                  | $ 1,735
|Property improvements and replacements            | (1,262)                  | (1,513)
|Payments on mortgage notes payable                | (551)                    | (512)  
|Changes in reserves for net operating liabilities | (69)                     | 9      
|Changes in restricted escrows, net                | 9                        | 223    
|Additional reserves                               | (69)                     | --     
|Net cash used in operations                       | $--                      | $(58)  



The Partnership Agreement provides that 99% of distributions of net cash from operations are allocated to the limited partners until they receive net cash from operations for such fiscal year equal to 7% of their adjusted capital values (as defined in the Partnership Agreement), at which point the general partners will be allocated all net cash from operations until they have received distributions equal to 10% of the aggregate net cash from operations distributed to partners for such fiscal year. Thereafter, the general partners will be allocated 10% of any distributions of remaining net cash from operations for such fiscal year.



All distributions of distributable net proceeds (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) from property dispositions and refinancings will be allocated to the limited partners until each limited partner has received an amount equal to a cumulative 7% per annum of the average of the limited partners' adjusted capital value, less any prior distributions of net cash from operations and distributable net proceeds, and has also received an amount equal to the limited partners' adjusted capital value. Thereafter, the general partners receive 1% of the selling prices of properties sold where they acted as a broker, and then the limited partners will be allocated 85% of any remaining distributions of distributable net proceeds and the general partners will receive 15%.



Allocation of Profits, Gains and Losses: Profits, gains, and losses of the Partnership are allocated between general and limited partners in accordance with the provisions of the Partnership Agreement.



Profits, not including gain from property dispositions, are allocated as if they were distributions of net cash from operations.



Any gain from property dispositions attributable to the excess, if any, of the indebtedness relating to a property immediately prior to the disposition of such property over the Partnership's adjusted basis in the property shall be allocated to each partner having a negative capital account balance, to the extent of such negative balance. The balance of any gain shall be treated on a cumulative basis as if it constituted an equivalent amount of distributable net proceeds and shall be allocated to the general partners to the extent that general partners would have received distributable net proceeds in connection therewith; the balance shall be allocated to the limited partners.  However, the interest of the general partners will be equal to at least 1% of each gain at all times during the existence of the Partnership.



All losses, including losses attributable to property dispositions, are allocated 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the general partners. Net income as shown in the statements of operations and changes in partners' deficit for 2006 and 2005 was allocated 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the general partners.  Net income per limited partnership unit for 2006 and 2005 was computed as 99% of net income divided by 27,500 average units outstanding.



Fair Value of Financial Instruments: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments", as amended by SFAS No. 119, "Disclosures about Derivative Financial Instruments and Fair Value of Financial Instruments", requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value.  Fair value is defined in the SFAS as the amount at which the instruments could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. The Partnership believes that the carrying amount of its financial instruments (except for long term debt) approximates their fair value due to the short term maturity of these instruments. The Partnership estimates the fair value of its long-term debt by discounting future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with that currently believed to be available to the Partnership for similar term, fully amortizing long-term debt. The fair value of the Partnership's long-term debt at the Partnerships incremental borrowing rate is approximately $14,859,000.



Other Reserves: The general partners may designate a portion of cash generated from operations as "other reserves" in determining net cash used in operations. Per the Partnership Agreement, the general partners designated as other reserves an amount equal to the net liabilities related to the operations of the apartment properties during the current fiscal year that are expected to require the use of cash during the next fiscal year. The change in other reserves was a decrease of approximately $69,000 in 2006 and an increase of $9,000 in 2005. These amounts were determined by considering changes in the balances of receivables and deposits, other assets, accounts payable, tenant security deposits, accrued taxes, due to affiliates, and other liabilities. At this time, the Corporate General Partner expects to continue to adjust other reserves based on the net change in the aforementioned account balances.



Cash and cash equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and in banks. At certain times, the amount of cash deposited at a bank may exceed the limit on insured deposits. Cash balances include approximately $195,000 at December 31, 2006 that are maintained by an affiliated management company on behalf of affiliated entities in cash concentration accounts.



Depreciation: Depreciation is provided by the straight-line method over the estimated lives of the apartment properties and related personal property. For Federal income tax purposes, the accelerated cost recovery method is used for real property over 19 years for additions after May 8, 1985, and before January 1, 1987. As a result of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, for additions after December 31, 1986, the modified accelerated cost recovery method is used for depreciation of (1) real property additions over 27 1/2 years and (2) personal property additions over 5 years.



Deferred Costs: Loan costs of approximately $475,000, less accumulated amortization of approximately $141,000, are included in other assets. The loan costs are amortized over the terms of the related loan agreements. Amortization expense was approximately $24,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 and is included in interest expense. Amortization expense is expected to be approximately $24,000 for each of the years 2007 through 2011.

















Leasing commissions and other direct costs incurred in connection with successful leasing efforts are deferred and amortized over the terms of the related leases.  Amortization of these costs is included in operating expenses.



Tenant Security Deposits: The Partnership requires security deposits from lessees for the duration of the lease and such deposits are included in receivables and deposits.  Deposits are refunded when the tenant vacates, provided the tenant has not damaged the unit and is current on its rental payments.



Leases: The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less. The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or in response to heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area.  Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.  The Partnership evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.



Investment Properties:  Investment properties consist of two apartment complexes and are stated at cost.  The Partnership capitalizes costs incurred in connection with capital expenditure activities, including redevelopment and construction projects, other tangible property improvements and replacements of existing property components.  Costs including interest, property taxes and operating costs associated with redevelopment and construction projects are capitalized during periods in which redevelopment and construction projects are in progress in accordance with SFAS No. 34 Capitalization of Interest Costs and SFAS No. 67, Accounting for Costs and the Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Properties.  Costs incurred in connection with capital projects are capitalized where the costs of the project exceed $250.  Included in these capitalized costs are payroll costs associated with time spent by site employees in connection with the planning, execution and control of all capital expenditure activities at the property level. During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Partnership capitalized interest of approximately $64,000 and $26,000, property taxes of approximately $18,000 and $10,000, and operating costs of $9,000 and $8,000, respectively.  Capitalized costs are depreciated over the useful life of the asset.  Expenditures for ordinary repairs, maintenance and apartment turnover costs are expensed as incurred.



In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the Partnership records impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate the assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amounts of those assets.  No adjustments for impairment of value were necessary for the years ending December 31, 2006 and 2005.



Segment Reporting: SFAS No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information established standards for the way that public business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports. SFAS No. 131 also established standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. As defined in SFAS No. 131, the Partnership has only one reportable segment.



Advertising: The Partnership expenses the costs of advertising as incurred. Advertising expense, included in operating expenses, was approximately $158,000 and $136,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

















Recent Accounting Pronouncement:  In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 154 Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, which replaces APB Opinion No. 20 and SFAS No. 3, and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. This statement is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Partnership adopted SFAS No. 154 effective January 1, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 154 did not have a material effect on the Partnerships financial condition or results of operations.



In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS no. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other standards require assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value and does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the information used in developing fair value estimates. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data, such as the reporting entitys own data. SFAS No. 157 requires fair value measurements to be disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Partnershipdoes not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have a material effect on the Partnerships financial statements.



In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Partnership has not yet determined whether it will elect the fair value option for any of its financial instruments.















Note B - Mortgage Notes Payable



The principal terms of mortgage notes payable are as follows:



|                         |                |           |          |          |           | 
|------------------------ | -------------- | --------- | -------- | -------- | --------- | 
|                         | Principal      | Monthly   |          |          | Principal
|                         | Balance At     | Payment   | Stated   |          | Balance  
|                         | December 31,   | Including | Interest | Maturity | Due at   
|                         | 2006           | Interest  | Rate     | Date     | Maturity 
|                         | (in thousands) |           |          |          |          
|Properties               |                |           |          |          |          
|Parktown Townhouses      |                |           |          |          |          
|1st mortgage             | $ 6,513        | $   61    | 7.21%    | 01/01/21 | $   --   
|Signal Pointe Apartments |                |           |          |          |          
|1st mortgage             | 7,411          | 70        | 7.22%    | 01/01/21 | --       
|                         |                |           |          |          |          
|Total                    | $13,924        | $131      |          |          | $--      



The mortgage notes payable are fixed rate mortgages that are nonrecourse and are secured by pledge of the respective apartment properties and by pledge of revenues from the respective rental properties. The mortgage notes payable include a prepayment penalty if repaid prior to maturity. Further, the properties may not be sold subject to existing indebtedness.



Scheduled principal payments of the mortgage notes payable subsequent to December 31, 2006 are as follows (in thousands):



|           |        
|---------- | -------
|2007       | $   592
|2008       | 636    
|2009       | 684    
|2010       | 735    
|2011       | 789    
|Thereafter | 10,488 
|           | $13,924



Note C - Income Taxes



The Partnership has received a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service that it will be classified as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes.  Accordingly, no provision for income taxes is made in the financial statements of the Partnership. Taxable income or loss of the Partnership is reported in the income tax returns of its partners.



The following is a reconciliation of reported net income and Federal taxable income (dollar amounts in thousands, except per unit data):



|                                   |         |        
|---------------------------------- | ------- | -------
|                                   | 2006    | 2005   
|                                   |         |        
|Net income as reported             | $   800 | $   724
|Add (deduct):                      |         |        
|Depreciation differences           | 96      | 238    
|Change in prepaid rental           | 16      | 15     
|Casualty                           | (68)    | (203)  
|Other                              | 55      | (48)   
|                                   |         |        
|Federal taxable income             | $899    | $726   
|                                   |         |        
|Federal taxable income per limited |         |        

|                 |        |       
|---------------- | ------ | ------
|partnership unit | $32.37 | $26.14



The following is a reconciliation between the Partnership's reported amounts and Federal tax basis of net liabilities (in thousands):



|                            |         
|--------------------------- | --------
|Net liabilities as reported | $(2,253)
|Buildings and land          | 717     
|Accumulated depreciation    | (4,362) 
|Syndication fees            | 3,111   
|Other                       | 276     
|Net liabilities - tax basis | $(2,511)

















Note D - Transactions with Affiliated Parties



The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Corporate General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all partnership activities. The Partnership Agreement provides for certain payments to affiliates for services and as reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.



Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from both of the Partnership's properties as compensation for providing property management services. The Partnership paid to such affiliates approximately $320,000 and $294,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, which are included in operating expenses on the accompanying statements of operations.



Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner charged the Partnership reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $252,000 and $262,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expenses and investment properties. The portion of these reimbursements included in investment properties for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 are construction management services provided by an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner of approximately $133,000 and $141,000, respectively. At December 31, 2006, the Partnership owed approximately $158,000 for accountable administrative expenses which is included in due to affiliates on the accompanying balance sheet.



In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, the Corporate General Partner has loaned the Partnership funds primarily to assist in the hurricane cleanup and repairs required at Parktown Townhouses due to flood damage as well as operations at both of the Partnerships properties. During the year ended December 31, 2006 the Corporate General Partner advanced the Partnership approximately $174,000 to pay outstanding accounts payable at Parktown Townhouses and Signal Pointe Apartments. During the year ended December 31, 2005 the Corporate General Partner advanced the Partnership approximately $308,000 to pay real estate taxes at Parktown Townhouses and for accounts payable resulting from the hurricane damage to Signal Pointe Apartments in 2004. During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Partnership paid approximately $590,000 and $403,000 in advances and accrued interest, respectively. Interest on advances is charged at the prime rate plus 2%, or 10.25% at December 31, 2006. Interest expense was approximately $35,000 and $57,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As of December 31, 2006 the indebtedness to the Corporate General Partner is approximately $97,000, including accrued interest, which is included in due to affiliates on the accompanying balance sheet.  Subsequent to December 31, 2006, the Corporate General Partner advanced approximately $298,000 to the Partnership to pay real estate taxes at Parktown Townhouses and operating expenses at both of the Partnerships properties.



During 1983, a payable to the general partners of approximately $58,000 was accrued for sales commissions earned. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2003, the Partnership accrued a sales commission due to the Corporate General Partner of approximately $47,000 related to the sale of Raintree Apartments. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, these liabilities cannot be paid until certain levels of return are received by the limited partners.  As of December 31, 2006, the level of return to the limited partners has not been met. As of December 31, 2006, these obligations were included in due to affiliates on the accompanying balance sheet.

















The Partnership insures its properties up to certain limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers compensation, property casualty, general liability and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its properties above the AIMCO limits through insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the Corporate General Partner. During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates approximately $126,000 and $76,000, respectively, for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.



In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interest in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 21,232.50 limited partnership units (the "Units") in the Partnership representing 77.21% of the outstanding Units at December 31, 2006. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the Corporate General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 77.21% of the outstanding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all such voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the Corporate General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the Corporate General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the Corporate General Partner, as corporate general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Corporate General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.



Note E  Investment Properties and Accumulated Depreciation



|                         |                |                |             |               
|------------------------ | -------------- | -------------- | ----------- | --------------
|                         |                | Initial Cost   |            
|                         |                | To Partnership |            
|                         |                | (in thousands) |            
|                         |                |                |             |               
|                         |                |                | Buildings   | Net Costs     
|                         |                |                | and Related | Capitalized   
|                         |                |                | Personal    | Subsequent to 
|Description              | Encumbrances   | Land           | Property    | Acquisition   
|                         | (in thousands) |                |             | (in thousands)
|                         |                |                |             |               
|Parktown Townhouses      | $ 6,513        | $ 1,095        | $ 5,329     | $ 9,985       
|Signal Pointe Apartments | 7,411          | 535            | 8,062       | 7,201         
|                         |                |                |             |               
|Totals                   | $13,924        | $1,630         | $13,391     | $17,186       



















|                    |                               |             |         |                |              |          |            
|------------------- | ----------------------------- | ----------- | ------- | -------------- | ------------ | -------- | -----------
|                    | Gross Amount At Which Carried |             |         |                |             
|                    | At December 31, 2006          |             |         |                |             
|                    | (in thousands)                |             |         |                |             
|                    |                               |             |         |                |              |          |            
|                    |                               | Buildings   |         |                |              |          |            
|                    |                               | And Related |         |                |              |          |            
|                    |                               | Personal    |         | Accumulated    | Date of      | Date     | Depreciable
|Description         | Land                          | Properties  | Total   | Depreciation   | Construction | Acquired | Life-Years 
|                    |                               |             |         | (in thousands) |              |          |            
|Parktown Townhouses | $ 1,095                       | $15,314     | $16,409 | $ 8,820        | 1969         | 03/01/81 | 5-35       
|Signal Pointe       |                               |             |         |                |              |          |            
|Apartments          | 535                           | 15,263      | 15,798  | 11,276         | 1970         | 06/30/81 | 5-37       
|                    |                               |             |         |                |              |          |            
|Totals              | $1,630                        | $30,577     | $32,207 | $20,096        |              |          |            



Reconciliation of "investment properties and accumulated depreciation":



|                             |                          |        
|---------------------------- | ------------------------ | -------
|                             | Years Ended December 31,
|                             | 2006                     | 2005   
|                             | (in thousands)          
|Investment Properties        |                          |        
|Balance at beginning of year | $30,764                  | $29,752
|Property improvements        | 1,466                    | 1,476  
|Disposals of property        | (23)                     | (464)  
|Balance at end of year       | $32,207                  | $30,764
|                             |                          |        
|Accumulated Depreciation     |                          |        
|Balance at beginning of year | $18,991                  | $18,022
|Additions charged to expense | 1,116                    | 1,104  
|Disposals of property        | (11)                     | (135)  
|Balance at end of year       | $20,096                  | $18,991



The aggregate cost of the investment properties for Federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2006 and 2005, is approximately $32,924,000 and $31,536,000, respectively.  The accumulated depreciation taken for Federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2006 and 2005, is approximately $24,458,000 and $23,438,000, respectively.



Note F - Casualty Events



During November 2005, one of the Partnerships investment properties, Signal Pointe Apartments, incurred approximately $46,000 in damages from a fire.  During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $39,000 and wrote off undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $8,000 resulting in a casualty gain of approximately $31,000.

















During February 2005, one of the Partnerships investment properties, Parktown Townhouses, incurred damages from a fire. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $192,000, estimated total building damages at approximately $309,000, wrote off undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $267,000 and did not recognize a loss related to this event as additional insurance proceeds were expected to be received during 2006. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Partnership received additional insurance proceeds of approximately $66,000 for building damages and approximately $51,000 for emergency repairs and clean up costs incurred and charged to operating expenses during the year ended December 31, 2005. The Partnership changed its casualty calculation estimate upon completion of improvements and recorded a casualty gain in the amount of approximately $36,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 as a result of the write off of undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $223,000. This change in estimate resulted in an increase of approximately $48,000 of property improvements and replacements for the year ended December 31, 2006. The receipt of the $51,000 for emergency repairs and clean up costs was reflected as a reduction to operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006.



During August and September 2004, one of the Partnerships investment properties, Signal Pointe Apartments, incurred damages from Hurricanes Charlie, Frances and Jeanne.  In 2004, the property estimated damages to the building from all three hurricanes of approximately $441,000.  The Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $131,000 and wrote off damaged assets of approximately $36,000, which resulted in the recognition of a casualty gain of approximately $95,000 during 2004.  During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Partnership revised the estimated damages to the building to approximately $773,000.  During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Partnership received additional insurance proceeds of approximately $126,000 and wrote off additional net assets of approximately $52,000 which resulted in a casualty gain of approximately $74,000.



In addition to building damages, the Partnership estimated clean up costs from the three hurricanes of approximately $312,000, which were not covered by insurance proceeds.  These costs were accrued at December 31, 2004.  During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Partnership obtained additional details on the costs to be incurred and revised the estimates for clean up costs to approximately $45,000.  As a result, the Partnership reduced the accrual for these costs by approximately $267,000, which is included in operating expenses.



During October 2004, one of the Partnerships investment properties, Signal Pointe Apartments, incurred damage from a fire.  During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $44,000 and wrote off undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $10,000 resulting in a casualty gain of approximately $34,000.



Note G - Contingencies



In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the Partnership commenced an action entitled Rosalie Nuanes, et al. v. Insignia Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Mateo. The plaintiffs named as defendants, among others, the Partnership, its Corporate General Partner and several of their affiliated partnerships and corporate entities. The action purported to assert claims on behalf of a class of limited partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) that are named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of interests in certain Corporate General Partner entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities that were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia; past tender offers by the Insignia affiliates to acquire limited partnership units; management of the partnerships by the Insignia affiliates; and the series of transactions which closed on October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby Insignia and Insignia Properties Trust, respectively, were merged into AIMCO. The plaintiffs sought monetary damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership. In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint captioned Heller v. Insignia Financial Group (the "Heller action") was filed against the same defendants that are named in the Nuanes action. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint. The Heller action was brought as a purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty, unfair competition, conversion, unjust enrichment, and judicial dissolution. On January 28, 2002, the trial court granted defendants motion to strike the complaint.  Plaintiffs took an appeal from this order.



On January 8, 2003, the parties filed a Stipulation of Settlement in proposed settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action. On June 13, 2003, the court granted final approval of the settlement and entered judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions. On August 12, 2003, an objector ("Objector") filed an appeal (the Appeal) seeking to vacate and/or reverse the order approving the settlement and entering judgment thereto. On May 4, 2004, the Objector filed a second appeal challenging the courts use of a referee and its order requiring Objector to pay those fees.



On March 21, 2005, the Court of Appeals issued opinions in both pending appeals.  With regard to the settlement and judgment entered thereto, the Court of Appeals vacated the trial courts order and remanded to the trial court for further findings on the basis that the state of the record is insufficient to permit meaningful appellate review.  The matter was transferred back to the trial court on June 21, 2005.  With regard to the second appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed the order requiring the Objector to pay referee fees. With respect to the related Heller appeal, on July 28, 2005, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial courts order striking the first amended complaint.



On August 18, 2005, Objector and his counsel filed a motion to disqualify the trial court based on a peremptory challenge and filed a motion to disqualify for cause on October 17, 2005, both of which were ultimately denied and/or struck by the trial court.  On or about October 13, 2005 Objector filed a motion to intervene and on or about October 19, 2005 filed both a motion to take discovery relating to the adequacy of plaintiffs as derivative representatives and a motion to dissolve the anti-suit injunction in connection with settlement.  On November 14, 2005, Plaintiffs filed a Motion For Further Findings pursuant to the remand ordered by the Court of Appeals. Defendants joined in that motion.  On February 3, 2006, the Court held a hearing on the various matters pending before it and ordered additional briefing from the parties and Objector. On June 30, 2006, the trial court entered an order confirming its approval of the class action settlement and entering judgment thereto after the Court of Appeals had remanded the matter for further findings.  The substantive terms of the settlement agreement remain unchanged.  The trial court also entered supplemental orders on July 1, 2006, denying Objectors Motion to File a Complaint in Intervention, Objectors Motion for Leave of Discovery and Objectors Motion to Dissolve the Anti-Suit Injunction.  Notice of Entry of Judgment was served on July 10, 2006.  On August 31, 2006, the Objector filed a Notice of Appeal to the Courts June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2006 orders. On December 14, 2006, Objector filed his Appellants Brief.  The Partnership and its affiliates, as well as counsel of the Settlement Class, have not yet filed their briefs in response.



The Corporate General Partner does not anticipate that any costs to the Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will be material to the Partnerships overall operations.

















AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP Management Company, both affiliates of the CorporateGeneral Partner, are defendants in a lawsuit alleging that they willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by failing to pay maintenance workers overtime for all hours worked in excess of forty per week. The complaint, filed in the United   States District Court for the District of Columbia, attempts to bring a collective action under the FLSA and seeks to certify state subclasses in California, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to compensate maintenance workers for time that they were required to be "on-call." Additionally, the complaint alleges AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to comply with the FLSA in compensating maintenance workers for time that they worked in excess of 40 hours in a week.   In June 2005 the court conditionally certified the collective action on both the on-call and overtime issues.  Approximately 1,049 individuals opted in to the class. The defendants moved to decertify the collective action on both issues and that issue is now fully briefed. The defendants anticipate that the Court will soon set oral argument on the defendants decertification motion.  Because the court denied plaintiffs motion to certify state subclasses, in September 2005, the plaintiffs filed a class action with the same allegations in the Superior Court of California (Contra Costa County), and in November 2005 in Montgomery County Maryland Circuit Court.  The California and Maryland cases have been stayed pending the outcome of the decertification motion in the District of Columbia case.  Although the outcome of any litigation is uncertain, AIMCO Properties, L.P. does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Similarly, the Corporate General Partner does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on the Partnerships financial condition or results of operations.



The Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding litigation matters involving it or its investment properties that are not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.



Environmental



Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of its properties, the Partnership could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs associated with its properties.



Mold

















The Partnership is aware of lawsuits against owners and managers of multifamily properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or settlements.  The Partnership has only limited insurance coverage for property damage loss claims arising from the presence of mold and for personal injury claims related to mold exposure.  Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner have implemented policies, procedures, third-party audits and training and the Corporate General Partner believes that these measures will prevent or eliminate mold exposure and will minimize the effects that mold may have on residents.  To date, the Partnership has not incurred any material costs or liabilities relating to claims of mold exposure or to abate mold conditions.  Because the law regarding mold is unsettled and subject to change the Corporate General Partner can make no assurance that liabilities resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnerships financial condition or results of operations.















Item 8.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure



None.



Item 8a.

Controls and Procedures



(a)

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Partnerships management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Corporate General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnerships principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnerships disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Corporate General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnerships principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Partnerships disclosure controls and procedures are effective.



(b)

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter of 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting.



Item 8b.

Other Information



None.













PART III



Item 9.

Directors, Officers, Promoters and Control Persons and Corporate Governance, Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act



Shelter Properties II (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") has no directors or officers. The names and ages of, as well as the positions and offices held by, the directors and officers of Shelter Realty II Corporation (the "Corporate General Partner") are set forth below. There are no family relationships between or among any directors or officers.



|                     |     |                                               
|-------------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------------
|Name                 | Age | Position                                      
|                     |     |                                               
|Martha L. Long       | 47  | Director and Senior Vice President            
|Harry G. Alcock      | 44  | Director, Executive Vice President and Chief  
|                     |     | Investment Officer                            
|Timothy Beaudin      | 48  | Executive Vice President and Chief Development
|                     |     | Officer                                       
|Miles Cortez         | 63  | Executive Vice President, General Counsel     
|                     |     | and Secretary                                 
|Patti K. Fielding    | 43  | Executive Vice President  Securities and Debt
|Thomas M. Herzog     | 44  | Executive Vice President and Chief            
|                     |     | Financial Officer                             
|Robert Y. Walker, IV | 41  | Executive Vice President                      
|Scott W. Fordham     | 39  | Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting    
|                     |     | Officer                                       
|Stephen B. Waters    | 45  | Vice President                                



Martha L. Long has been a Director and Senior Vice President of the Corporate General Partner since February 2004. Ms. Long has been with AIMCO since October 1998 and has served in various capacities.  From 1998 to 2001, Ms. Long served as Senior Vice President and Controller of AIMCO and the Corporate General Partner.  During 2002 and 2003, Ms. Long served as Senior Vice President of Continuous Improvement for AIMCO.



Harry G. Alcock was appointed as a Director of the Corporate General Partner in October 2004 and was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of the Corporate General Partner in February 2004 and has been Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of AIMCO since October 1999.  Mr. Alcock has had responsibility for acquisition and financing activities of AIMCO since July 1994, serving as Vice President from July 1996 to October 1997 and as Senior Vice President from October 1997 to October 1999.



Timothy Beaudin was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer of the Corporate General Partner and AIMCO in October 2005.  Prior to this time, beginning in 2005, Mr. Beaudin was with Catellus Development Corporation, a San Francisco, California-based real estate investment trust.  During his last five years at Catellus, Mr. Beaudin served as Executive Vice President, with management responsibility for development, construction and asset management.



Miles Cortez was appointed Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Corporate General Partner in February 2004 and of AIMCO in August 2001.  Prior to joining AIMCO, Mr. Cortez was the senior partner of Cortez Macaulay Bernhardt & Schuetze LLC, a Denver law firm, from December 1997 through September 2001.















Patti K. Fielding was appointed Executive Vice President - Securities and Debt of the Corporate General Partner in February 2004 and of AIMCO in February 2003.  Ms. Fielding was appointed Treasurer of AIMCO in January 2005.  Ms. Fielding is responsible for debt financing and the treasury department.  Ms. Fielding previously served as Senior Vice President - Securities and Debt of AIMCO from January 2000 to February 2003.  Ms. Fielding joined AIMCO in February 1997 as a Vice President.



Thomas M. Herzog was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Corporate General Partner and AIMCO in November 2005 and was appointed Executive Vice President of the Corporate General Partner and AIMCO in July 2005.  In January 2004, Mr. Herzog joined AIMCO as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer and of the Corporate General Partner in February 2004.  Prior to joining AIMCO in January 2004, Mr. Herzog was at GE Real Estate, serving as Chief Accounting Officer & Global Controller from April 2002 to January 2004 and as Chief Technical Advisor from March 2000 to April 2002.  Prior to joining GE Real Estate, Mr. Herzog was at Deloitte & Touche LLP from 1990 to 2000.



Robert Y. Walker, IV was appointed Senior Vice President of the Corporate General Partner and AIMCO in August 2005 and served as the Chief Accounting Officer of the Corporate General Partner and AIMCO from November 2005 to January 2007. Mr. Walker was promoted to Executive Vice President of the Corporate General Partner and AIMCO in July 2006 and in January 2007 became the chief financial officer of Conventional Property Operations for AIMCO. From June 2002, until he joined AIMCO, Mr. Walker served as senior vice president and chief financial officer at Miller Global Properties, LLC, a Denver-based private equity, real estate fund manager.  From May 1997 to June 2002, Mr. Walker was employed by GE Capital Real Estate, serving as global controller from May 2000 to June 2002.



Scott W. Fordham was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer in January 2007 of the Corporate General Partner and AIMCO. Prior to joining AIMCO, Mr. Fordham served as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Brandywine Realty Trust. Prior to the merger of Prentiss Properties Trust with Brandywine Realty Trust, Mr. Fordham served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Prentiss Properties Trust and was in charge of the corporate accounting and financial reporting groups. Prior to joining Prentiss Properties Trust in 1992, Mr. Fordham worked in public accounting with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.



Stephen B. Waters was appointed Vice President of the Corporate General Partner and AIMCO in April 2004.  Mr. Waters previously served as a Director of Real Estate Accounting since joining AIMCO in September 1999.  Mr. Waters has responsibility for partnership accounting with AIMCO and serves as principal financial officer of the Corporate General Partner.



One or more of the above persons are also directors and/or officers of a general partner (or general partner of a general partner) of limited partnerships which either have a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15(d) of such Act. Further, one or more of the above persons are also officers of Apartment Investment and Management Company and the general partner of AIMCO Properties, L.P., entities that have a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15 (d) of such Act.



The board of directors of the Corporate General Partner does not have a separate audit committee. As such, the board of directors of the Corporate General Partner fulfills the functions of an audit committee. The board of directors has determined that Martha L. Long meets the requirement of an "audit committee financial expert".















The directors and officers of the Corporate General Partner with authority over the Partnership are all employees of subsidiaries of AIMCO. AIMCO has adopted a code of ethics that applies to such directors and officers that is posted on AIMCO's website (www.AIMCO.com). AIMCO's website is not incorporated by reference to this filing.



Item 10.

Executive Compensation



No directors and officers of the Corporate General Partner received any remuneration from the Registrant during the year ended December 31, 2006.



Item 11.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management



Except as noted below, no person was known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Limited Partnership Units of the Partnership as of December 31, 2006.



|                             |                 |           
|---------------------------- | --------------- | ----------
|Entity                       | Number of Units | Percentage
|                             |                 |           
|Cooper River Properties, LLC | 1,958.5         | 7.12%     
|(an affiliate of AIMCO)      |                 |           
|AIMCO IPLP, L.P.             | 9,128.0         | 33.19%    
|(an affiliate of AIMCO)      |                 |           
|AIMCO Properties, LP         | 10,146.0        | 36.90%    
|(an affiliate of AIMCO)      |                 |           



Cooper River Properties, LLC and AIMCO IPLP, L.P. are indirectly ultimately owned by AIMCO. Their business address is 55 Beattie Place, Greenville, South Carolina 29602.



AIMCO Properties, L.P. is indirectly ultimately controlled by AIMCO. Its business address is 4582 S. Ulster St. Parkway, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80237.



No director or officer of the Corporate General Partner owns any units. The Corporate General Partner owns 100 Units as required by the terms of the Partnership Agreement. AIMCO Properties, LP, the other general partner, has acquired 10,136 units as the result of one or more tender offers.



Item 12.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence



The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Corporate General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all partnership activities. The Partnership Agreement provides for certain payments to affiliates for services and as reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.



Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from both of the Partnership's properties as compensation for providing property management services. The Partnership paid to such affiliates approximately $320,000 and $294,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, which are included in operating expenses on the accompanying statements of operations included in Item 7. Financial Statements.



Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner charged the Partnership reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $252,000 and $262,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expenses and investment properties. The portion of these reimbursements included in investment properties for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 are construction management services provided by an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner of approximately $133,000 and $141,000, respectively. At December 31, 2006, the Partnership owed approximately $158,000 for accountable administrative expenses which is included in due to affiliates on the accompanying balance sheet included in Item 7. Financial Statements.



In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, the Corporate General Partner has loaned the Partnership funds primarily to assist in the hurricane cleanup and repairs required at Parktown Townhouses due to flood damage as well as operations at both of the Partnerships properties. During the year ended December 31, 2006 the Corporate General Partner advanced the Partnership approximately $174,000 to pay outstanding accounts payable at Parktown Townhouses and Signal Pointe Apartments. During the year ended December 31, 2005 the Corporate General Partner advanced the Partnership approximately $308,000 to pay real estate taxes at Parktown Townhouses and for accounts payable resulting from the hurricane damage to Signal Pointe Apartments in 2004. During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Partnership paid approximately $590,000 and $403,000 in advances and accrued interest, respectively. Interest on advances is charged at the prime rate plus 2%, or 10.25% at December 31, 2006. Interest expense was approximately $35,000 and $57,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As of December 31 2006 the indebtedness to the Corporate General Partner is approximately $97,000, including accrued interest, which is included in due to affiliates on the accompanying balance sheet included in Item 7. Financial Statements.  Subsequent to December 31, 2006, the Corporate General Partner advanced approximately $298,000 to the Partnership to pay real estate taxes at Parktown Townhouses and operating expenses at both of the Partnerships properties.



During 1983, a payable to the general partners of approximately $58,000 was accrued for sales commissions earned. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2003, the Partnership accrued a sales commission due to the Corporate General Partner of approximately $47,000 related to the sale of Raintree Apartments. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, these liabilities cannot be paid until certain levels of return are received by the limited partners.  As of December 31, 2006, the level of return to the limited partners has not been met. As of December 31, 2006, these obligations were included in due to affiliates on the accompanying balance sheet included in Item 7. Financial Statements.



The Partnership insures its properties up to certain limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers compensation, property casualty, general liability and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its properties above the AIMCO limits through insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the Corporate General Partner. During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates approximately $126,000 and $76,000, respectively, for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.



In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interest in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 21,232.50 limited partnership units (the "Units") in the Partnership representing 77.21% of the outstanding Units at December 31, 2006. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the Corporate General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 77.21% of the outstanding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all such voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the Corporate General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the Corporate General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the Corporate General Partner, as corporate general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Corporate General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.



Neither of the Corporate General Partner's directors is independent under the independence standards established for New York Stock Exchange listed companies as both directors are employed by the parent of the Corporate General Partner.



Item 13.

Exhibits



See Exhibit Index.



Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services



The Corporate General Partner has reappointed Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors to audit the financial statements of the Partnership for 2007.  The aggregate fees billed for services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for 2006 and 2005 are described below.



Audit Fees.  Fees for audit services totaled approximately $38,000 and $35,000 for 2006 and 2005, respectively.   Fees for audit services also include fees for the reviews of the Partnership's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-QSB.



Tax Fees.  Fees for tax services totaled approximately $8,000 for both 2006 and 2005.















SIGNATURES





In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





| |                                    
| | -----------------------------------
| | SHELTER PROPERTIES II              
| |                                    
| | By:   Shelter Realty II Corporation
| | Corporate General Partner          
| |                                    
| | By:   /s/Martha L. Long            
| | Martha L. Long                     
| | Senior Vice President              
| |                                    
| | By:   /s/Stephen B. Waters         
| | Stephen B. Waters                  
| | Vice President                     
| |                                    
| | Date: March 23, 2007               





In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.





|                     |                        |                     
|-------------------- | ---------------------- | --------------------
|/s/Harry G. Alcock   | Director and Executive | Date: March 23, 2007
|Harry G. Alcock      | Vice President         |                     
|                     |                        |                     
|/s/Martha L. Long    | Director and Senior    | Date: March 23, 2007
|Martha L. Long       | Vice President         |                     
|                     |                        |                     
|/s/Stephen B. Waters | Vice President         | Date: March 23, 2007
|Stephen B. Waters    |                        |                     



SHELTER PROPERTIES II



EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit



3

See Exhibit 4(a)



4

(a)

Amended and Restated Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership [included as Exhibit A to the Prospectus of Registrant dated February 2, 1981 contained in Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 2-69507 of Registrant filed February 2, 1981 (the "Prospectus") and incorporated herein by reference].



(b)

Subscription Agreements and Signature Pages [Filed with Amendment No. 1 of Registration Statement No. 2-69507, of Registrant and incorporated herein by reference].



10(i)

Contracts related to acquisition or disposition of properties.



(a)

Purchase Agreement dated December 31, 1980, between Hubris, Inc. and U.S. Shelter Corporation to purchase Parktown Townhouse.*



*Filed as Exhibit 12(a) to Amendment No. 1 of Registration Statement No. 2-69507 of Registrant filed February 2, 1981 and incorporated herein by reference.



(iii)

Contracts related to refinancing of debt:



(g)

Multifamily note dated December 15, 2000 , by and between Registrant and Reilly Mortgage Group, Inc., for Parktown Townhouses Apartments.**



(i)

Multifamily note dated December 15, 2000 , by and between Registrant and Reilly Mortgage Group, Inc., for Signal Pointe Apartments.**



**Filed as Exhibit 10(iii) (g) and (i), respectively, to Form 10-KSB of Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference.



31.1

Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



31.2

Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



32.1

Certification of the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Martha L. Long, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Shelter Properties II;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 23, 2007

/s/Martha L. Long

Martha L. Long

Senior Vice President of Shelter Realty II Corporation, equivalent of the chief executive

officer of the Partnership



Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Shelter Properties II;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 23, 2007

/s/Stephen B. Waters

Stephen B. Waters

Vice President of Shelter Realty II Corporation, equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership



Exhibit 32.1





|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|Certification of CEO and CFO                 
|Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,          
|As Adopted Pursuant to                       
|Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Shelter Properties II (the "Partnership"), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: March 23, 2007   
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: March 23, 2007   





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.