alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007115EN.01000101.xml

| 25.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4638 — CERP/Sanacorp/Millenium)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 115/01)

On 4 May 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4638. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4638. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
#### STATE v. TOLLEY

No. 13 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 213.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7Á-31 denied 4 November 1976.
#### PONDER v. BUDWEISER OF ASHEVILLE

No. 16 PC.

Case below: 30 N.C. App. 200.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 November 1976.
United States Department of Labor

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

__________________________________________

D.E., Appellant

and

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, 

Palmdale, CA, Employer

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 21-0043

Issued: April 20, 2021

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Appellant, pro se

Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge

JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

On October 2, 2020 appellant filed an appeal from a March 27, 2020 merit decision of the 

Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards 

assigned Docket No. 21-0043.

The Board, having duly considered this matter, concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 

21-0043 must be dismissed. The Board’s jurisdiction is limited to the review of final adverse 

OWCP decisions issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act (FECA).1 For final 

adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review authority 

is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s 

decision.2

The 180th day following the March 27, 2020 decision was Wednesday, 

September 23, 2020. As appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until October 2, 2020, 

more than 180 days after the March 27, 2020 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal 

docketed as No. 21-0043 is untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. 

 

1 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

2 20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) (2009).
2

Appellant has not offered a reason to explain her failure to timely file an appeal with supporting 

documentation sufficient to establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no adverse, final 

decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the October 2, 2020 filing of the instant appeal, the 

Board concludes that the appeal, docketed as No. 21-0043, must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0043 is dismissed.

Issued: April 20, 2021

Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

 

3 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” 20 

C.F.R. § 501.6(d).
#### HAL RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 7609

April 30, 1975

534 P.2d 913

*Morgan D. Harris,*Public Defender, and *Philip M. Pro,*Deputy Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellant.

*Robert List,*Attorney General, Carson City; *George E. Holt,*District Attorney, and *Daniel M. Seaton,*Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

*267OPINION

*Per Curiam:*

Hal Richardson was convicted of the crime of fraudulent use of credit card to obtain credit in excess of $100 and was sentenced to a term of six years in the Nevada State Prison. It is from this conviction that Richardson appeals.

Richardson’s conviction stems from the use of another’s credit card for hotel accommodations and entertainment while in Las -Vegas, Nevada. Richardson in defense asserted that he had received permission to use the credit card from its owner by calling him from Las Vegas, and that he merely was using the card as reference when he registered, intending to pay for the room bill with his own money. On cross-examination of Richardson, the State, over the objection of opposing counsel, elicited the fact that Richardson had used the credit card in question to purchase his air fare to Las Vegas prior to calling the owner of the card. It is the admission of this evidence that Richardson claims as error on appeal, and further, that if not error in its admission, then error by the trial court in not giving a limiting instruction as to the extent of consideration to be afforded it.

The trial court prior to receiving the testimony of Richardson in regard to this evidence dismissed the jury and heard argument from both parties as to its relevancy and prejudicial effect. The trial court then made the determination that the evidence went to establishing Richardson’s intent and motive at the time of presenting the credit card on registration and for this purpose it was allowed into evidence. Admission for this purpose under the facts of this case is allowed. NRS 48.-045(2); Lindsay v. State, 87 Nev. 1, 478 P.2d 1022 (1971); *268Tucker v. State, 82 Nev. 127, 412 P.2d 970 (1966); Fernandez v. State, 81 Nev. 276, 402 P.2d 38 (1965); Wallace v. State, 77 Nev. 123, 359 P.2d 749 (1961); State v. Cerfoglio, 46 Nev. 332, 205 P. 791 (1923). The trial court by dismissing the jury to determine whether the probative value of the evidence outweighed its prejudicial impact complied with Nester v. State, 75 Nev. 41, 334 P.2d 524 (1959); see also Lindsay v. State, supra.

Under the circumstances of this case the failure of counsel to request a limiting instruction waives the right to complain of the failure to give such an instruction. Wallace v. State, supra; cf. Mears v. State, 83 Nev. 3, 422 P.2d 230 (1967).

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4781 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4781

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the maximum 
                  corporate rate of tax to 22 percent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 2010

  Mr. Tiahrt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the maximum 
                  corporate rate of tax to 22 percent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keeping American Businesses 
Competitive Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN CORPORATE MARGINAL INCOME TAX RATES.

    (a) General Rule.--Paragraph (1) of section 11(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (A),
            (2) by striking ``25 percent'' in subparagraph (B) and 
        inserting ``22 percent'',
            (3) by striking ``but does not exceed $75,000,'' in 
        subparagraph (B) and inserting a period,
            (4) by striking subparagraphs (C) and (D), and
            (5) by striking the last 2 sentences.
    (b) Personal Service Corporations.--Paragraph (2) of section 11(b) 
of such Code is amended by striking ``35 percent'' and inserting ``22 
percent''.
    (c) Conforming Amendments.--Paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 
1445(e) of such Code are each amended by striking ``35 percent'' and 
inserting ``22 percent''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009, except that 
the amendments made by subsection (c) shall take effect on the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5436 

To prohibit the Minerals Management Service from issuing permits or environmental or safety waivers for any deepwater drilling rig in the Gulf 

of Mexico until the discharge of oil from the last Deepwater Horizon 

well has stopped and a congressional committee has issued a report 

finding the cause of the explosion on and sinking of the Deepwater 

Horizon. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 27, 2010 

Mr. BUCHANAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Minerals Management Service from issuing 

permits or environmental or safety waivers for any deepwater drilling rig in the Gulf of Mexico until the discharge of oil from the last Deepwater Horizon well has 

stopped and a congressional committee has issued a report finding the cause of the explosion on and sinking 

of the Deepwater Horizon. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5436 IH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND 

2 WAIVERS FOR DEEPWATER OIL DRILLING IN 

3 GULF OF MEXICO. 

4 (a) PROHIBITION.—The Minerals Management Serv5 ice may not issue any permit or grant any waiver of any 

6 environmental or safety requirement or restriction under 

7 any Federal law for any deepwater drilling rig in the Gulf 

8 of Mexico before the date on which— 

9 (1) the discharge of oil from the last well drilled 

10 by the semi-submersible drilling rig Deepwater Hori11 zon has stopped; and 

12 (2) a Committee of the House of Representa13 tives or the Senate has issued a report that includes 

14 a finding of the cause of the explosion on and sink15 ing of the semi-submersible drilling rig Deepwater 

16 Horizon. 

17 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

18 (1) the term ‘‘deepwater drilling rig’’ means an 

19 offshore facility used for drilling in, exploring for, 

20 developing, or producing oil in water that is greater 

21 than 1,000 feet in depth; and 

22 (2) the term ‘‘offshore facility’’ has the mean23 ing that term has in the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 

24 (33 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xtra-Gold
Resources Corp. (theCompany) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), I, JAMES WERTH LONGSHORE, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (a)
        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (b)
        the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:
        August 12, 2009
        /s/
        James Werth Longshore
  By:
        James Werth Longshore
 Principal Executive Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2007111EN.01007201.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 111/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 111/72

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 16 April 2007

appointing an Italian alternate member to the Committee of the Regions

(2007/260/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Italian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 24 January 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 24 January 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 (1).

| (2) | A seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Alberto ZAN, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Alberto ZAN,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following is appointed as alternate member of the Committee of the Regions:

Ms Carmela CASILE, Consigliere comunale del Comune di Giaveno (Torino),

in place of Mr Alberto ZAN for the remainder of his term of office, which runs until 25 January 2010.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 16 April 2007.

For the Council

The President

H. SEEHOFER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 56, 25.2.2006, p. 75.

1

---
#### In re Jerril J. KROWEN, Respondent.

No. 89-719.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Submitted March 13, 1990.

Decided April 30, 1990.

Before SCHWELB and FARRELL, Associate Judges, and KERN, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Section ll-2503(a) of the D.C.Code mandates disbarment for a “member of the bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals [who] is convicted of an offense involving moral turpitude.” D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (1989 Repl.). Pursuant to this statute the District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility (Board) recommends disbarment of Jer-ril J. Krowen on the ground that he stands convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude — mail fraud. We adopt the Board’s recommendation.

In November 1985, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts convicted respondent Jerril J. Krowen of fifteen counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341-1342 (1982). He was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for each count, to be served concurrently. On January 14, 1987, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed respondent’s conviction. *United States v. Krowen,*809 F.2d 144 (1st Cir.1987).1

In *In re Bond,*519 A.2d 165, 166 (D.C.1986), this court concluded that a conviction under the federal mail fraud statute is a conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude. Relying on *In re Bond,*the Board recommends that an order be entered disbarring respondent pursuant to D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (1989 Repl.). Accordingly, we order that respondent’s name be, and it hereby is, stricken from the roll of the members of the bar of this court as of August 7, 1989, the date of his suspension from the bar of this court.

*So ordered.*

1

. On August 7, 1989, upon receipt of a certified copy of the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals and pursuant to D.C.Bar Rule XI, § 15(1) & (4), the District of Columbia Court of Appeals suspended respondent from the practice of law and directed the Board to initiate a formal proceeding "for the purpose of determining whether or not the crime involves moral turpitude within the meaning of D.C.Code § ll-2503(a)."
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Anju
      Tandon, President, Chief Executive Officer and Financial Officer of TNT Designs,
      Inc., (the “Registrant”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, certify that the
      Quarterly Report of the Registrant on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period
      ended
      December 31, 2007, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that
      information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date: February
      14, 2008




*/s/
              Anju Tandon*Anju
                Tandon
              President,
                Chief Executive
              and
                Financial Officer
#### Kulwinder KAUR, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-73272.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 2005.**

Decided April 11, 2005.

Garish Sarin, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Joan E. Smiley, Esq., Richard M. Evans, Esq., DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Kulwinder Kaur, a native and citizen of India, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of her motion to reopen proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review. The immigration judge discharged the order to show cause and terminated the underlying deportation proceedings. Therefore, there is no final order of deportation, and we lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of the motion to reopen. *See 8*U.S.C. § 1105(a); *Kuh v. INS,*758 F.2d 370, 371 (9th Cir. 1985) (order rescinding permanent resident status not reviewable until final order of deportation entered).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 212 / Thursday, November 3, 2005 / Notices 66903 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Tessie Higgs, Executive Office, 

Telephone: (202) 429–3836. 

Dated: October 31, 2005. 

Patricia P. Thomson, 

Executive Vice President, United States 

Institute of Peace. 

[FR Doc. 05–22016 Filed 11–1–05; 12:30 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6820–AR–M 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS 

Construction Advisory Board; Notice 

of Meeting 

The Department of Veterans Affairs 

(VA) gives notice under Public Law 92–

463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) 

that a meeting of the Construction 

Advisory Board will be held on Tuesday 

November 15, 2005, at the Department 

of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont 

Avenue NW., Room 430, Washington, 

DC. The meeting will begin at 1 p.m. 

and end at 5 p.m. 

The purpose of the Board is to 

provide advice to the Secretary of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs 

regarding VA construction. The Board 

will make recommendations to the 

Secretary on the nature and scope of the 

Department’s construction processes. 

The meeting will be open to the 

public from 1 p.m. to 2 p.m., with an 

opportunity for public comments during 

that period. The Board will discuss its 

final recommendations to the Secretary. 

From 2 p.m. to 5 p.m., the Board will 

discuss selected personnel matters 

affecting the management of VA’s 

construction program. To protect 

personal privacy and in accordance 

with 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6), that portion of 

the meeting will be closed. 

Members of the public may direct 

questions or submit written statements 

for review by the Board in advance of 

the meeting. Any member of the public 

wishing to make a brief oral 

presentation or to attend the meeting 

should contact Doug Belling, Designated 

Federal Officer, at the Office of Asset 

Enterprise Management (004B), 

Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 

Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 

20420, or by telephone at (202) 273–

6675. 

Dated: October 27, 2005. 

By Direction of the Secretary. 

E. Philip Riggin, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05–21891 Filed 11–2–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320–01–M 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS 

National Research Advisory Council; 

Cancellation of Meeting 

The Department of Veterans Affairs 

(VA) gives notice under Public Law 92–

463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) 

that the National Research Advisory 

Council meeting scheduled for Tuesday, 

November 8, 2005, at the Hamilton 

Crowne Plaza Hotel, 14th & K Streets, 

NW., Washington, DC, has been 

cancelled. 

Any member of the public wishing 

further information should contact Ms. 

Karen Scott, Designated Federal Officer, 

at (202) 254–0200, or 

karen.scott@hq.med.va.gov. She can 

also be reached by writing to Ms. Scott 

at Department of Veterans Affairs, Office 

of Research and Development (12C), 810 

Vermont Ave, NW., Washington, DC 

20420. 

Dated: October 27, 2005. 

By Direction of the Secretary. 

E. Philip Riggin, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05–21890 Filed 11–2–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320–01–M