Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 23 / Friday, February 4, 2005 / Notices 6005

2005 has been Extended to 03/01/

2005.

Dated: February 1, 2005. 

Robert W. Hargrove, 

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office 

of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 05–2177 Filed 2–3–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–6660–3] 

Environmental Impact Statements and 

Regulations; Availability of EPA 

Comments 

Availability of EPA comments 

prepared pursuant to the Environmental 

Review Process (ERP), under Section 

309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 

102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 

Policy Act, as amended. Requests for 

copies of EPA comments can be directed 

to the Office of Federal Activities at 

(202) 564–7167. 

An explanation of the ratings assigned 

to draft environmental impact 

statements (EISs) was published in the 

Federal Register dated April 2, 2004 (69 

FR 17403). 

Draft EISs 

ERP No. D–FAA–E51051–FL Rating 

EC2, Panama City-Bay County 

International Airport (PFN), Proposed 

Relocation to a New Site, NPDES Permit 

and U.S. Army COE Section 404 Permit, 

Bay County, FL. 

Summary: EPA expressed concerns 

due to wetland and secondary impacts, 

and requested additional information on 

secondary development and impacts 

induced by the proposed airport 

relocation, wetland mitigation, and the 

sponsor’s site selection process. 

ERP No. D–FHW–H40183–00 Rating 

LO, Council Bluffs Interstate System 

Improvements Project, Transportation 

Improve from Missouri River on I–80 to 

East of the I–480 Interchange, (Tier 1), 

Pottawattamie County, IA and Douglas 

County, NB. 

Summary: EPA has no objections to 

the proposed project. ERP No. D–FRC–

G03023–TX Rating EC2, Cheniere 

Corpus Christi Liquefied Natural Gas 

(LNG) Project, To Provide Facilities for 

the Importation, Storage and 

Vaporization of Liquefied Natural Gas, 

Nueces and San Patricio Counties, TX. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns and requested 

additional information regarding 

wetlands mitigation measures, the 

potential for invasive species 

introduction, and air quality impacts. 

ERP No. D–NIH–G84000–TX Rating 

LO, Galveston National Laboratory for 

Biodefense and Emerging Infectious 

Diseases Research Facility at the 

University of Texas Medical Branch, 

Construction, Partial Funding, Grant, 

Galveston, TX. 

Summary: EPA had no objection to 

the selection of the preferred alternative. 

However, EPA asked that the Final EIS 

include a discussion of general air 

quality conformity. 

ERP No. D–STB–G53010–TX Rating 

EC2, Southwest Gulf Railroad Project, 

Construction and Operation Exemption, 

To Transport Limestone from Vulcan 

Construction Materials (VCM) Quarry to 

Del Rio Subdivision, Medina County, 

TX. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about the 

proposed project regarding the Spill 

Prevention, Containment and 

Countermeasure Plan, aquatic steam 

crossing mitigation measures, and air 

quality impacts.

Final EISs 

ERP No. F–BIA–L02031–OR Wanapa 

Energy Center, Construction and 

Operation a New 1,200 Megawatt (MW) 

Natural Gas-Fired Electric Power 

Generating Facility, Confederated Tribes 

of the Umatilla Indian Reservation 

(CTUIR), in the City of Hermiston and 

the Port of Umatilla, OR. 

Summary: No formal comment letter 

was sent. 

ERP No. F–FHW–D40093–PA City of 

Lebanon Bridge Over Norfolk Southern 

Railroad Tracks Construction Project, 

12th Street to Lincoln Avenue, Funding, 

Lebanon County, PA. 

Summary: EPA has no objections to 

the preferred alternative. 

ERP No. F–FHW–F40408–00 Trunk 

Highway 60 Reconstruction Project, 

Improvements from 1.8 miles south of 

the Minnesota-Iowa Border (120th 

Street) to I–90 north of the City of 

Worthington, Funding, U.S. Army COE 

Section 404 and NPDES Permits 

Issuance, Nobles County, MN and 

Osceola County, IA. 

Summary: EPA has no objections to 

the preferred alternative. 

ERP No. F–FRC–G03022–LA Sabine 

Pass Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and 

Pipeline Project, Construction and 

Operation LNG Import Terminal and 

Natural Gas Pipeline Facilities, Several 

Permits, Cameron Parish, LA. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns and requested 

additional information regarding postconstruction monitoring of wetland 

mitigation and sediment toxicity testing 

of dredged material. EPA will also 

continue coordination efforts with the 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as the 

Aquatic Resources Mitigation Plan is 

finalized and the Clean Water Act 

Section 404 permit application is 

reviewed. 

ERP No. F–FTA–D54041–VA Dulles 

Corridor Rapid Transit Project, HighQuality and High-Capacity Transit 

Service in the Dulles Corridor, West 

Falls Church Metrorail Station in 

Fairfax County to the Vicinity of Route 

772 in Loudoun County, VA. 

Summary: EPA’s comments have been 

adequately addressed in the Final EIS 

and has no objections to the preferred 

alternative. 

ERP No. F–IBR–K39088–CA 

Sacramento River Settlement 

Contractors (SRSC), To Renew the 

Settlement Contractors Long-Term 

Contract Renewal for 145 Contractors, 

Central Valley Project (CVP), 

Sacramento River, Shasta, Tehama, 

Butte, Glenn, Colusa, Sutter, Yolo, 

Sacramento, Portion of Placer and 

Solano Counties, CA. 

Summary: EPA expressed continuing 

concerns regarding direct, indirect, and 

cumulative impacts to water quality 

associated with the contract renewals. 

EPA requested additional information 

on water quality degradation in the area, 

water demand calculations, and 

methods of water conservation that will 

be implemented. 

ERP No. F–USA–J11020–UT 

Activities Associated with Future 

Programs at U.S. Army Dugway Proving 

Ground, Implementation, Tooele and 

Jaub Counties, UT. 

Summary: No formal comment letter 

was sent. 

ERP No. FB–FTA–L40205–00 South 

Corridor Project, I–205/Portland Mall 

Light Rail (Phase I), Selected the Locally 

Preferred Alternative (LPA), Clackamas 

and Multnomah Counties, OR. 

Summary: No formal comment letter 

was sent. 

ERP No. FS–GSA–G80000–TX Del Rio 

Port of Entry (POE), Increased Security 

Measures Associated with Phase II 

Expansion, Supplement to the 1992 Del 

Rio Border Patrol Station, Del Rio, Val 

Verde County, TX. 

Summary: EPA has no objections to 

the proposed project.

Dated: February 1, 2005. 

Robert W. Hargrove, 

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office 

of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 05–2178 Filed 2–3–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P